11-28-90 MinutesMr. C. F. Ceftin, Jr., Chairman
Mr. G. H. ADDI~uate
Mr. Harry G. Daniel
Mr. Jesse J. Mayas
Lane B. Ramsay
Count~ Administrator
Staff in Attendance=
Ms. Barbara
Dir., Of~. on Youth
Ms. Amy Davis,
Asst. to Co. Ad~i~.
Mrs. Doris Da~art,
Asst. Co. Admin.,
Le~is. Svcs. and
~tsrgovern. Affairs
Mr. William Dig,s, Dir.,
Ms. Joan S. Dolezal,
Chief Robert Eanes, Jr.
Fire
Mr. Bradford S.
Management Services
~r. Thomas E. Jaoobson,
DAr., Plarmlng Dept.
~S. Ma~ Leu
Dir., A¢¢eunti~g D~pt.
Deputy Co. Admin.,
ML Richard McKlfish,
Dir., Env. Eng. Dept.
Mr. Steve L. Micas, Co.
Attornsy
Mrs. Pauline Mitchell,
Dir. uf News & P%~lic
NS+ Lucill~ Moseley,
Mr. William D-
Chief, Dev. Review,
Planning Depar~me~
~r. Richard Sale,
DeDuty Co. Admin.,
Development
Dir. of Budget & Mgt.
~r. M. D. $tith, Jr.,
Dir. of Parks &
Mr. David Welchons,
Dir. of ~tilities
Mr. Frederick Willis,
Dir. of Human
Mr. Currin called the =sgularly Scheduled m~uting tO order at
9:10 a.m. (EST}.
1. INVOCATION
Mr. Currln introduce~[~. Milla=d D. "Pete" Stith, Director of
the Pa~k~ a~d Recreation Department, who ~ave th~ i~Vocation.
90-860 11/28/90
Sheriff Clarence G. Williams led the Pledge of Allegiance
the Flag of the United States of America.
3. A~FROVALOF~INb'I~S
There was discussion relative to corrections to the Nove~er
14, 1990 minute~ concerning Item 14, Extensions of Public
Water and/er Sewer Service to Existing Subdivi~iens, etc.
After brief discussion, it was generally agreed corrections,
as noted, clearly reflected the action taken by the board. It
was on motion of Mr. D~nlel~ seconded by Mr. S~lliva~, the
Board approved the minutes of November 14, 1995, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
NE. Mayes stated he had un~ezsteo~ the policy adopted in the
MovemDer 14, 1990 minutes regarding the extensions of DYLbliC
water and sewer to existing subdivisions did not include
paragraph 1.c. and he would bring b~ck to the Board a paper
concerning this mat%er.
~. Rammey introduced Mrs. Lucille Noseley, Director of the
Chesterfield County Museum, who presented the Beard with
copies of the newly printed, updated ChusteIfield Co~ty
1607-1954".
5. BOARD C(~I'~REPORTS
Mr. D~niel expressed appreciat±~n to the many individuals who
had exnpressed persenal interest in his and his f~il~'s well
V~rginia Association of Counties (VACo) Board cf Directors
meeting, at which there was aqreement to a more focalized
legislative Drogr~ noted that ~. J~es C~pbell, with the
Virginia Municipal Lea~e, wa~ appointed a~ the new
of VACo; and attended a meeting, hosted ~y Ric~on~ Regional
Planning District Co~ission (~DC), with the legislators
regarding the Chesapeake Bay P~eservation Act.
Co~onweal=h, a~ WhiCh there wa~ discussion r~garding th~
system, which he ha~ di=cus~ed with the Chai~an and County
A~inistrator; attended a demonstration on the computer
curricul~ au Harr~ga=e =lemen=ary school which he felt
exceptional and co,ended the school and A~ini~tration for
tapir efforts; ~d par=ioipa:e~ in a ~-mite march
~. Apple~ate reported he attend the Capital Re, ion Airport
co~ission (C~C) meeting, at which it was ~ote~
and cargo continue to inczeasu~ noted ~. Melvin Shaffer was
elected Treasurer to fulfill the unexpired te~ ~f Mr. John
Mazza, Sr.~ and noted tsar a ~eeti~g wit~ Aitli~
was oonduote~ to diSOUMM an agreement for the construction and
Virginia Association of Co.ties {VACO) Board of Directore and
Mr. Daniel was uluQt~d a~ ~con~ Vice President of
90-861 11/28/90
Mr. Sult±va~ reported that, in addition to routine meetly§s,
he attended a meeting hu~orln~ the youth of the County
sponsored by the James River Optimist Club a~ Neadowbrcck High
School.
Mr. Curri~ reported he attended the Virginia Association of
Counties (VACo) mept~n~; represented the County at the
Ricb3~o~d Regional Plannlnq District Co,mission (RRPDC) meeting
with lmg~sl~tors regarding the Chesapeake Bay Preserva=iun
Act; and attended bend closing with Mr. Ramsay in New York.
6. P,,I~L~.,~"J~$ TO PO~i~ONEACTION~ EMERGENC~ADDITION$OR
[]~HI~ES IN T,~ O~/)ER OF P~ATION
On motio~ of Mr. Sullivum, seconded hy Mr. Appl~gate, the
~oard deferred until December 12, 1990 Item i!.A., Purchase of
Fill Dirt for Cover R~pair at Fort D~rling L~ndfill~ added
Item 7.~., Resole=ion Reco~nlzing Decmmber 1 9, 1990 as
"Hunger Awarenemm Week"; and adopted the agenda, as amended.
7. I~E~L~TIONH AND SPECIAL P~COG~ITIONS
7.A. I4R. R73~{ W. ~B~N, ~. ~IOR ~r~ ~
On mo~ion c~ the Boar~, the followin~ resolution was adoDted~
~AS, Mr. Hugh W. Robert~on, Jr., Senior Raporter for
of the chesterfield County Board of Supe~isors and the
a~inistraCive stai~ ~or the Ric~ond News Leader since 1984~
and
~E~, ~r. Rob~rtson ~a extremely knowledgeable in his
chosen ~rofessLon, beln~ a second gensration journalist with
an undergraduate degree from the University of Virginia in
1955 and a Master's De,rem i~ Journalism from Col~ia
University in 1956; and
~EREAS, Mr. Robertso~ increased his knowledge and
zha~ene~ his sk~ll~ by working with such preztigious news
organizations as United ~ress in M~phi~, T~n~ee a~ with
the Ric~o~d News Leader ~rom 1965 until the pre,est; ~d
the Virginia General ksse~lF, where he earned n~erous
Vizginia Pzesm Asmomia~ium Awards.
NOW, TH~ BE IT ~SOLV~, that the
Co~ty Board of Supervisorm dc~$ h~r~by reco~ize and
appreciate the fair-minded intelligence ~. Hugh Robertson,
Jr. exhibited in his r~porting and do~s wish him a happy and
healthy retirement.
Mr. Curtis presented the executed re~olution to Mr. Robertson,
~o~ended him for his professionali~ and fair-~nde~ess
raportin~ County new~ and ~tated hi~ presan=~ would b~
but wimh~d h~ well in hi~
OUTSTANDING YO~TN, ADULTS AND O~GANIEATIONS ADVOCATING
MS. Barbara Bennett, Director of the Office on Youth,
introduGed Ms. Lillian Duffie, chairman of the Youth services
90-862 11/2S190
Co~i~sion, who recognized the following reeiDients of the
"outstanding Youth in Chesterfield County Awards for
NAME S~QOL
Elizabeth L. Bedard L.C. Bird High School
David K. Dahlq~ist Midlothian High School
Ted Ford Manchester High school
Shajuan N. Mason Matoac~ ~gh School
Heather Q~inle~ Monacan ~igh School 12
~ristopher N. ~a~eliffe Ma~oaQa High School 11
Clifford ~. Robinson, Jr. Thomas Dale Eigh School 10
Jennifer O. Trout ~anchester High School
achievements aB~ recognized members of their ~amily and
Gregory, retiring members of the Youth Services Commission.
on motion of the ~oard, the following resolution was adopted:
WKE=REAS, The ~oard of Supervls~rs iecegai~es the need
WFiEREAS, The Board of snDelvisors established the Youth
WHEREAS, The Youth Servi~ms Co~ission r~li~s upon the
~alents, co~i~% and dedication of youth ~d adult citizens
people;
exceptional time, ener~, ~d spiri= to t~eir
in~vidual accomplis~entS; a~d
the accomplis~nts and co~i~nt of their yegg people; and
she hm~ advocated steadily and effectively for recognition of
N~, ~REFO~ BE IT ~SOLV~D, %hat the Chesterfield
Count~ Board of supervisors hereby expr~s=~ its sincere
yegg ~eoDle of chesterfield County.
~D, B~ IT F~TH~ ~sQLV~, that a copy of this
thia reaotution be ~=rmunen~ly r6corded ~ong =h~ paper= of
OB ~otion of the Board, th9 following resolution was adopted:
positive, health~ ~outh develo~ent in Chesterfield
90-863 11/28/90
WHEREAS, The Youth Services Commission relies upon ~he
talents, commitment, and dedication of youth and adult
citizens to organire projects which address the needs of our
young people; and
WHEREAS, The Chesterfield community wishes to r~oogni~e
the accomplishments and commitment of =heir young people; and
WHEP~EAS, F~S. sarah Gregory has served for five years as
a member of the Youth Services Commission and du~ing that ti~e
she has oenslstently and e~fectively reached cut to individual
youths, helped to sponsor progra~ and organizations which
serve young people and advocated for an u~derstandtng of youth
and community needs through this and other co~uni~y
organizations.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOL%q~D, that the chesterfield
County ~oar~ of supervisors hereby expresses its sinoer~
gratitud~ and appreciation to Mrs. Sarah Gregory for her
constant ¢~e and dedicated efforts on behalf of %he youn~
people of Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy o~ this
resolution be formally presented t~ Firs. Sarah Gregory and
that ~his resolution be permanently recorded among the papers
of the Che~te~£ield Coumty Board of Supervisors.
Vote: Unanimous
Hudson and Mrs. Sarah Sregory and co,ended thom for their
County.
~s. Bennett further introduced Ms. Lynn Pettish and MS.
Lillian Duffle, representing signst Bank; ~essrs. Jack Waters
a~d Willis ~ope, representing The Optimist Club of James River
Chesterfield; and Ms. ~ichelle Drehcff, representing
Cloverleaf ~all Merchant~ A~so¢i~tio~, who wer~ present.
On m~tiee o~ the Board, the following reseintle~ was adopted:
W~E~EAS, The Beard ~ Supervisors recognizes the need for
positlv~, healthy youth development in Chesterfield COUnty;
and
W~F~U~AS, The Board e~ Supervisors establish~ tAe
Services Co~i~$io~ to ad~ooat~ for youth in our
and
~EA8, The Youth Services Co~ion relies upon the
talents, c~i~nt, and dedieatlon of individual citizens
organizations withi~ our co~it~ =o organize a~d ~ponsor
~ER~S, Signet Ba~ at Genito Crossing ha= sponsored th~
consistently ~upported progr~s serving the youth in our
c~unity~ and
~E~AS, ~e Optlmis= Ci~ of J~es River-Chesterfield
ha~ coordinated and helped to ~pon~or the Youth Awards
encourage positive, productive activities for our
peo~l~; and
~EREAS, The Cloverleaf ~all ~rchan~s Association
advocated for o~ youth through their endorsement and support
of a Youth Health Fair.
90-864 1~/2~190
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the chesterfield
gratitude and appreciation to Signet Bank at Genito Crossing;
The optimist club of Jam~ Eiv~r-Ohesterficl~; and ~hc
Cloverleaf Mail Merchants Association for the strong position
the2 have taken to encourage the young p~opl~ of chesterfield
¢o~ty and to make this co~unit~ a healthy enviro~ent for
our ~outh.
AND, BE IT FURTMER RHSO~VED, ~hat a copy of ~his
r~$ol~tion be formally preseuted to a iepresentat~ve from each
of there organizati0~ and that this resolution ~e permanently
rc¢or~ ~nong the palm~r~ of the Chesterfield County Board of
supervisors.
and Ms. Duffle, Messrs. Waters and Pope and Ms. Drehoff and
expressed appreciation for their organizations' interest,
partioipation and contributions tO the yO~th of tAe County.
P. EsTORATIONOFEPPIN~TON
On motion of the Bcar~, the Board accepted a donation in the
amount of $12,500 from ~ho Re,ail ~ercha~s Association of
Gr~%~r Richmond to the Parks and Recreation DeDart/~ent toward
the ruatorauion of Mppington Plante%ion an~
~ollowing re~olution:
WI~ER~AS, The Retail Merchants Association of Greater
members, and h~s a long history an~ proud tradition of funding
projoct~ i~ the Riohmon~ Metro area that enhancer the q~ality
of life for all citizens; and
W~A~, ~he Eppington ~lantation, a frequent visiting
place of Thomas Jefferson, and an attractive architectural
structure and significant historic building, is in
restoration; and
WHEREAS, Members of The Retail Merchants Association of
Greater Richmond generously donate~ $12,500 ~oward uhe
restoratio~ of Eppi~gton;
WHEREAS, ~Ynis initial donation will allow work to begin
on inventorying and cleaning EpDington for future
Chesterfield ¢itizen~.
NOW, T~tEREFOR~ B~ IT P~S0LV~D, that the
County Board cf Supervisors do~s hereby recognize the m~mbers
of The Re,ail Nercha~ts Association of Greater Richmond for
its generoua donation toward aaaistanca in the restoration
Eppington.
VC~C: Unanimous
Mr. Currin presented the ux=cuted resolution to Messrs. J~ff
Smith and ~ill ~arkar and expxesscd appreciation for thci~
generous contribution toward the restoration of ~ppington
Plantation.
11/28/9~
7.D. NAMING Tm QI~D DA~A~ROCEHSII~G BUIL~...I_NG IN ~OR OF
On mo~iun of ~he Soard, ~he following r~solution was
~E~AS, ~. J~e~ ~oma~ Ros~, Sr., CAE was th~ firs~
Assessor of Real ~state for Chesterfield County, being
appointed by the Board of Supervisors, June, 1953 and servin~
unt&~ his r~tir~t in 197Q; and
~, Mr. Rose brought with h~ vast knowledge
asse~sinq property in Virginia, having worked ~ten~iv~ly
State Department o~ T~ation; and
WHE~AS, Mr. Ro~e exe=ci~ed keen and astute leadership
est~lishing the office and ~i~in~ th~ offic~ through a
vulutile growth period, a period where the palcel co~t being
managed incxeased from 14,500 parcels with a t~ base of $40.5
million to ~.7~0 parcels with a t~ base of $~3~.1 million;
~E~, Mr. Ros~ fostered honor and r~s~ect ~or
professional recognition of great Drominenc~ ~on~ ~ellow
asEessor~ bu they local or nationwide~ and
pxofessional ~tatu~e and the furthering of education for
a~sessors and was further recognized by the Intern=tional
kn~ledge by conferring on him the ~rti~ied
Evaluator designation, being the 124th in th~ ~ation and 2nd
in the s=at~ to reoeive suoh honor; and
~E~AS, Mr. Rose was a dedicated D~lic servant in every
respect and involved himself in many =ivi¢ a~ co~nity
affairs until his death in May, 1987.
NOW, THE~FO~ BE IT ~SOLVED, by the Chesterfield County
proce~i~ building, in ~ome ~mali way, re~lect~ the renpect
Cheste~fleld County accorded Mr. J~s ~omas Rose, Sr., CAE.
Vote:
an~ other me. ers of the f~ily who w~re pre~ent and stated
~. R~se was held in the h~ghest esteem.
7.E. ~O(~IZING DEC~/~ 1 - 9, 1990 AS "HUNGEI{ AWA~ESS
WEEK"
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
~E~S. ~e Ric~ond k~m~ci~tion of Realtors
Richfood are sponsorin~ the Chris.as CanTres Project, a
co~ity food drive taking place during the week of
spirited org~izatlons; and
~E~AS, ~e Chris.as CanTree is a s~olic 25-foot
Chris.as tree located at Regency S~uare and consisting of
~E~AS, ~e goal of the chri~as CanTrem project is
collect a total of 100,000 ponds of fo~ from concerned
citizens to be distributed to the needy through th~ Central
Virginia Poo~ank.
90-866 11/28/90
I
NOW~ THEREFORE BE IT · RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of supervisors does hereby recogaise D~a~mbcr I -
9, ~990 as "Hunger Awareness Week" in the County of
chesterfield, virginia, and eemmends all those associated with
the Christmas CanTree Project for their commitment Xn the
fight against hunger in the county of Chesterfield and the
co~0~wealth of Virginia, and oall~ its significance to the
attention ef all our citizens.
Mr. Currin stated the executed zesel~tio~ would be presented
at a cerameny in cenjunc=ion with ~he Richmoad Association of
Realtors and Richfcud's Christmas CanTree Project.
8. ~EARINGS OF CITIT~S O~I ~I{S~n~n~-LED ~A'r~'~ OR CIJ%IMS
zlaima.
9. D~K~RED ITemS
9.A. I~3~IC [tEARIN~ TO CGNS/L1)~ A~E~DING x~ FYgl
~UDGET TO APPROI~tIATE $47t275t000 IN ,.B~,..,~.RO~E~D~
I~4TE~EST;
bo~d proceeds and i~t~r~t a~d adoptio~ of the bend
authorization r~$01~tion~ ~d briefly ~utllned the proposal.
Mr. Daniel r~estsd a spread sheet outlining in detail the
e~unditur= of $42,190,000 for ~chool projects prior to any
lion come fo~ard to e~lain and/or up,re the proposed
Mr- George B~adle~ e~zessed conc~z~ t~t the School Board
continues to mpend funds and not outline where those
are occurring. He stated the Co~ty goverment is
ins shortages ~nd 0u~aeks and he felt the School Buard should
also ca,ack.
There being ~0 f~rther public input~ the Board held further
appropriation; the approval of ~ontracts to construct certain
appropriation to the School Board ~or said proj~ot~
r~s~onsibili~y of the School ~oard and/or School
SupHrintendent for such action; etc.
~essrs, Currln ~nd Sullivan explained that t~e Sckool Board
prior to the approval after it had taken place; that the
$~perintendent and his staff; indicated such action would not
be tolerated ~ th~ Board of Supe~i~or~ i~ the future; and
tha~ there was no satisfactury excuse for such actlun to have
occurred withnut appropriate au~h0rization. Mr. Kayes
he felt th~ r~po~ibility for ~aid action was that of
School Board~ not the School Superintendent. Mr. Daniel
stated he iel~ th~ Board of $~pgrvisor$ should have be~n made
aware of the circ~sta~ces collectively ~d that such action
should cease and would not ~ tolerated at ~y level
seconded by Mr. ~yss, that the Board d~fer until later in the
day to consider a reg~ast to amend %he FYPl County budge% 90
appropriate $4?,2?5,000 in bo~d proceeds and interest and
adoption of the bond authorization resolutions,
9.B. CC~SIDERI~ESTTOKk'r~DWAT~E~%riCET0
~. sale state~ ~. May~ h~s re~s~d the w~t~T line
extension to the r~i~der ~ Glebe Point s~ivisio~ be
reconsidered an~ briefly outline~ ~e re.est re~ardin~
which he noted was de~erred from the S~Dt~er 2~, 1990
meeting.
D~scussion, ~estions and co~ents ensued relative to
financing mechanisms ~or the Te~est to extend water service
t0 thi~ ~rea: etc.
several areas in the County which included ~unterm
~lebe Point, as well as other ~reas, the majority of which was
~ended in ~he ~atoaca District; etc.
~. Mayas rs~s~ud a bxeakdown of the list o~ Dxojects and
previous discussions regarding a reduction in %h~ scope
services fo= the ~h~sic Hill water tower fun~ing that oo~ld be
~. Sullivan s~ate~ th~s re~as~ involves a portion of ~l~be
~oinz that was not ~riginally included in the plan ~r.
Applegate addressed and if this ex~e~dit~e were t0 be
~ende~ ~zom utility fundm, approval would ult~ately result
in a ratepayer increase; re~eranced an artiol~ concerning
households wi=hoot any ~lic ~acilities which h~ felt needed
mor~ indepth attention, which he s~itted to the Board lot
as h~ felt it would pla~e an u~nece~ary ~inancial burden on
all County
Mr. C~rln stated the Hoard ha~ adopted a new policy for
addressing the ne~ds for public water and ~ewer an~ tha~ sai~
policy ~hould be followed.
Mr. Mayes stated h~ ~el~ the z~sidents in this portion of
Glebe Poi~ should be given e~it~le consideration for relie~
to their pxobl~s: and that hm mu~Dorte~ t~e pa~r.
Mr. Daniel stated the Hoard ham D~licly ~ded water an4
sewer in ~he past under vRrio~ cir=~stances; stated he ham
supported water for Glebe Point and ~till does, howmvmr, the
Health Director has in~icated that s~id water does not present
an i~dlate danger to health, safety and welfare concerns to
area residents; state~ tha~ the Boar~ hRs adopted a
which indicatmm that such re~emts mU~t be incorD0r~te~ ~nto a
focalized CIP and that fundin~ then be ior site specific
pzojeetm: he ielt that the matter ~hould be referred back t~
staff for continued review and ~hat they b:ing forwmrd f0~al
reco~endations at the tame the CIP im developed in the
spring; ~ef~rmnced a new~ item by ~VA regarding the new
policy and ~ overall rate in=re,se Xt would czeate, which h~
felt was ~naccurate.
da~erred consideIati0~ 0f th~ re.est to extend wa~er services
~O th~ remainder of Glebe Point S~divimion until the CIP has
been prepared and have =he p/ojec= conzidered at that time.
00-868
Mr. Sullivan sta~ed he di~ not ~eel it aeuessary to de,er the
matter as it would a~tomaticall¥ be included in the CIP and
request be denied so that the project could be included in the
CIP. Mr. Daniel stated he could not support a denial but
Mr. Daniel amended his motion, seconded by Mr. Coffin, the
supervisor~s policy for extensions to exis=ing subdivisions,
with funding for extensions to existing subdivisions being
pxessnted to the Board for consideration in the Utilities
Vote: Unanimous
suffering of those people in the a~fected area when ethers
assistance at all.
9.C. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC ~APJ/~G TO CONSIDER '-'~ ABANIK~/~T
OF APORTIONOFSAMBAR~OAD
Mr. Sale explained staf~ is requesting re~cheduling of the
~li~ hearin~ date to oonsi~er the ab~do~nt of a ~rtion
of S~ar Road based c~ citizens' concerns r~gar~g ~h~
proposed rezoning of properties at S~ar and Old courthouse
On motion of Mr. Mayea, seconded by ~. ADDlegate, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTiO~ OF ~ CO~OF CHEST~tELD~S I~IO~ TQ CONSIDER A ~SOLUTION ~ O~EK TO
~AS, On ~pte~r 12, 1990, the Board of
S~ar Road; and
~E~ On October 24, 1990~ a p~lic he,ring was
to consider a Resolution and Order to a~andon said portion
S~ar Road; and
~EREAS, Due =o p~lic co~ent, the Board d~erred
conaideration until Nov~ez 28, 1990; and
~ER~S, It is ~n the best interest of the D~lic
re~chedule ~he p~lic hea~ing and to post and ~lish noticss
of the rescheduled meeting.
THE~FORE, Pursuant to Section 33.1-151 of the C~
Chesterfield Co~ty Board of Supervisors kereby gives notic=
~hat a~ a r~lar m~ing to be h~ld on J~uar~ 9, 1991, it
will consider a R~solution and Order to ~andon a portion
A portion of S~ar Road, Route 2034, within
of Portion o~ Section B, as mho~ on a plat
1977, a co~ of which is attached to this
resolution.
Aocordinqly, Th~ Cl~rk of ~he ~oar~ ~hall send a cody of
this resolution to the Stat~ Transportation
9§-8~9 11/2g/90
thereof. The clerk shall ~urther cause to be published and
posted the required notices of the Board's intention to
abandon this portion of samba~ Read.
Vote: Unanimous
10. P~BLICHEARINGB
10.A. TO CC~SIDERANORDINA~CETOA~DT~C~E OF 'Z'~LI~O~lr~,I~
OF~-rK~FIELD~..~978, A~ A~ND~D, BY A~DIN~ SRL=rlON
8-67 P~T-~TINGTOu~K'I~/PTCkTES OF REGISTRATIONFOR~ORT-
'rr~u~B~3SINEBBES
Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been scheduled for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of
the county of Chesterfield, 1978, as amende~, r~lati~g to
certificates of registration fez short-berm businesses and
b~iefly explained the proposed o~dinanoe.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
proposed ordinanca.
On motion of Mr. sullivan, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the
Boaz~ adopted the following or~inanee~
AN ORDINANCE TO A%~TD ~'~ ~ OF ~R COI~T%r OF
c~S~'~mu~Iw~-~, 1978, AS A~a~DED, BY A~NDING S~CTION
8-67 R~[.ATING TO CERTIFICATES OF REGISTRATION
I~OR S~OR~TEI~ R~TAL B~SINESSES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervixora of Cheater-
field County:
(1} That tbs Code s~ the County o~ Chestelfield, 197~,
as amended, is ~men~ed and reenacted to re~d as follows:
Sec. 8-67. Certificat~ oi Registration.
(a) Every person engaging in the short-te:m rental
business shall annually ~ile an applioatien for a certificate
of registration with the commissioner of revenue. Such
application shall be fited no later than January 31 of each
ysar. Th~ appllca~ioa ~hsll be o~ a ~orm prescribed by the
¢ommission~r of revenue an~ ~hall ~ forth the name under
which th~ applicant in~ends to operate the rental business,
the location and s~¢h other infor~0atlon a~ the commissioner o~
/evenue may ~equire.
(b) An application must be signed by the owner er owners
o~ the rental business. I~ the ~ental business is owned by an
association, partnership or col~poratfon, the application must
be signed by a member, partner, executive o~icer or other
I~rnon ~p~cif~eally authorized by the association, partnership
or corporation to si~n on its behalf.
(c) upon approval of the applied=ion by the eommissi0ner
of revenue, a certificate of registration shall b~ innu~d.
The certificate shall be conspicuously displayed at all times
a~ ~he place of business for which it is issued.
(d) The certifiua~e iz not assignable and shall be valid
of business designated,
11/28/90
10.B. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ~ '£~ CODE OF 'l'~ CO~TY
OF C~z/~FT~-~, 1978r ~ ~, ~ ~X~DIIqG ~
I~AL-~'Le,IG 5KCT/Ce,1 12-3g ~ ~ C~ ~J'HI,~[C
OFFICIALS FRDM '£mm PAYMENT OF BU-~INE-~.~ LICENSE TJu~.~
Mr. Micas Stated this date and time had been scheduled for a
the county of chesterfield, t978, as amended, to exempt
certain a~hletie officials from the pal~en% of business
Mr. Daniel brieily explained the proposed ordinance,
indicating, as d~afted, =he ordinance would only exempt
individuals who earned $5,8~0 or less esch year and said
ordinance would be e~Zective wiCh Che 1991 tax year. ~r.
Mayes stated that it appeared business licenses should be
classified if exemptions for certain individual~ were to be
made and expressed concern that apprsval would set a
D~eeedent,
Mr. George Beadles voiced concern regarding the impact of the
proposed ordinance and suggested that a new ordinance be
drafted outlining stipulated business license criteria, those
businesses to whom it would ~e applicable and that all else
~o~ld be considered e×empt.
After ~urther di~c~io~, it was on ~otio~ of Mr. Sullivan,
seconded bM Mr, D~iel, resolved that the following ordi~n~
~I~, 1978, ~ ~, ~ ~ ~
~IN~ ~ 12-39 ~ ~ ~N A~-~IC
BE IT O~N~ by t~e Boa!d of Su~I~isor~ oi C~este~-
field Co,tM:
(1} T~a~ Section 12-~ of the C~e of the Co~y of
Chesterfield, t978, us ~undud, is ~undud and ruunucted as
Sec. 12-39. Enumerated~ amount of license tax.
Every person engaged in one (1) or more of the following
businesses shell pay a license tax squat to ten dollars
($10.001 for all gros$ receipts below five thousand dollars
($5,000.00) and thirty-six hundredths ef eno per eent~ of the
gross receipts above ~ive thousand ~ollars ($5,~00.0~) for the
businesses conducted by him as follows:
(13) Every person engaged in the business of officiating
aShlstic events for public or non-profit institu-
tions shall be exempt from the duty to apply for a
~usin~ss license Or pay such license tax i~ =he
gross receipts for such services does not exceed
five thousand dollare ($5,000.00] during each
taxable year.
(2) This ordinance shall be effective for the 1991 tax
year.
Ayes: Mr. Currin, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Daniel.
Abstention: Mr. Mayas.
WAST~ANAG~ENTA~THOP~TY
Mr. H~I s~a=ed this date and tim~ ha~ b~n a~vertised for a
D~lie h~ring to consider a resolution crea~ing the Central
Virginia Wast~ ~anag~m~n~ A~hority.
Mr. ~eor~a B~adles statzd h~ ~e]t that i~ th~ County were ~o
conside= paying persons serving on %his Board that a record-
keeDin~ mechanism be im~lemente~ to track e~enses so the
Count~ could b9 z~i~urs~d by =h~ Authority.
On motion of ~. Sullivan, seconded by ~=. Applegate, the
Board adoDted the followin~ resolution:
~AS, 27,000 tons of solid waste are generated in the
C~onwe~lth of Virginia each day necessitating improved waste
of citizens of the Co~onwealth; and,
~AS, the General AsK~Iy ~s impesed remitments
upon each locality to develop plans by the year 1995 to
locality; and,
~S, th~ Ric~ond~ri-Cities ~ea Solid Waste Task
Force of the Ric~ond Regional ~d crater ~lanning Distriot
Co~issions has researched th~ problem of solid wast~
manag~ent and disDosal in %h~ ~c~on~/Tri-Ci=i~z A~ea and
has r~c~ended the fo~ation of a waste manag~ent authorlt~
to he kn~n a~ th~ Central Virginia Wast~ ~nagemen%
Authority; and
~k~, the Board of Supe~isors of Chesterfield County
~dopted ~ re~olution on Septe~er 12, 199Q, e~ressin~ its
Authority; and,
~S, a copy of this resolution together with a notice
stating on this date ~d time a D~lic hearin~ would be held
on this resolution was p~lishud on October 27, 1990 i~ the
Ric~on~ News Lea~e: an~ 0=tobit 27, 1990 in th9 Progress
Iad~x pursuaat to S~c. 15.1-1243, Code of Virginia, 1950, as
NOW, ~E~FORE, BE IT ~SOL~, that the Board o~
Supervisors of Chesterfield Co~ty flndm ~t in the p~lic
interest to join together with the Cities o~ ~c~ond,
Petersburg, colonial Keights an~ HoDewell, the Counties of
Charles Cit~, Goochla~d, Hanover, He~ico, New ~ent~ P~hat~.
Prince George a~d ~he TO~ of Ashland to form a was=e
management authorit~ p~nt to th~ Virginia Water ~d Sewer
Authorit~Rm Act ~n a~cor~nc~ wi~h tho ~ollowia~ ~%icles of
Incorporation.
C~ ~GINIA ~ ~ A~
1. The following political s~divisions hereb~ create
an authorit~ Dur~nt to the Virginia Water and Sewer
Auuhori=ies Act (Cha~ter 2~, Ti=le 15.1 of the Code of
Virginiu (1950), as ~ended) (hereinafter the "Act") and are
the incorporating political s~divisions of this authority:
Charles City Cowry, Chesterfield County, Guochl~d Co~ty,
Hanover County, Henrico County, N~w K~nt County, ~owhat~
Count~, Prince George County, City of Colonial ~eiqhts, City
90-872 11125190
ef Hepewell, City of Petersburg, City o~ Richmond and the ToWn
of Ashland.
2. The name of the authority shall be the "Coat,al
Virginia Wast~ Management Authority" (hereinafter the
"Autho~ity"~ and the address of its initial, principal offius
shall he 2104 West L~urnum Avenue, suite 2Ul, RiChmond,
Virginia 23Z27.
3. The powers of the Au~horit~ shall bo exercised by a
Board of Directors. In accordance with paragraph 8 o~ these
articleS, the governing bod~ of each incorporatin~ pulltioal
s~division shall ~ppoiDt at least one of its residents to the
Board and mu~ appoint an alternate for each moa%bar. Each
shall be entitled to vote in the absence of the alternators
designated member. All ~ers a~d alternates appsin=a~ to
su¢¢$ed the initial Board shall be a~pointud to the
Authority~s Board for a term of a= l~ast one year. The
governing body of each participating political subdivision
shall determine the term ef office of its members and
al~er~atss, which shall ~s £or a term of years not to ~xceed
~our years. AS directors of the Authe/ity's Board, members
and alternates shall hold o££ice until their successors have
been appointed. Members and alternates also may succeed
themselves.
4. The names and addresses of the first members, the
names of the appointing political subdivisions, and the dates
of the Authorlty's initial B~ard, are as ~ollows:
~a~e and A~rPs~ Appointing Political ~oupiration
Fred A. Darden
~t. l, Box 17~-~
Charles City, VA 23030
William H. Bow=ll
2101 Gatesh~ad Drive
Richmond, VA 23235
Robert L. Doan
4105 Millwood Road
Chester, VA ~3831
Stuart Pouliot
4030 Litchfield Drive
Chesterfield, VA 23852
Gregory K. Wolfrey
518 Edgehill Wood Drive
~anakin-sabo~, VA
virginia Curd
Route 1, Box 495-A
Mechanicsville~ VA
$~sa~ Brenzovich
5894 Tangle Ridge Drive
~echanicsvill~, VA
23111
P. T. Rutledge, Jr.
9350 Walls Road
Ric~ond, VA 23231
Charles City County Q2-01-92
County of Chesterfield 12-31-93
County of Chesterfield 12-31-93
Cou~%%y of Chesterfield 12-31-93
23103 County of Go~¢hland 12-31-95
County of Hanover 01-24-94
Co~ty of Hanover 06-30-94
County o~ Henrice 1~-31-93
90-873
11/28/90
William S. Dewhirst
2408 Ra~mond Drive
Richmond, VA 23228
John L, Joyner
12200 Ceuntr~ Creek Way
Glen Allen, VA 23060
Robert A. BoRoughs
MCR-G1, Box 95
Barhamsville, VA 25011
Paul N. Adkins
257R Judes ~rry Road
Powhatan, VA 23139
John G. Kine~, Jr.
10905 Appletree Lane
Hopewell, VA 23860
Robert E. Taylor
4523 Berkshire Lane
Colonial Heights, VA
23834
Clinton M. Strong
813 Smithfield Avenue
Hop~well, VA 13960
Richard M. Brown
1605 Drury Road
County of Menrico
County of aeezico
County of New Kent 12-31-9~
County of Pewhaten 12-31-91
county of Prince George 12-31-93
12-31-93
City of Colonial Heighae 12-31-93
City of ~opmwe]l 12-31-93
Petersburg, VA 23803 City Of Petersburg 12-31-93
Wetland W. Rennie, Sr.
~401 Wilmington Avenue
Richmond, VA 23227 City of R/chmond 12-31-93
B~tty Byrn~ Ware
6317 Rid~eway Road
Ri0bmond, VA 23226 City of Richmond t2-31-93
Charles ~. Williams, Jr.
3518 W. Weyburn Road
Richmond, VA 23235 City of Richmond
David W. Reynai
112 Five Oaks Lane
Ashland, VA 2~005 Town of Ashland 12-31-93
5. The Autherlt¥'s ~urpesem are to pla~,
construct, reconstruct, improve, extend, operat~r contract
and maintain any qarbag~ and refus~ ~ollectlon, tr~s~er and
~inpo~al progr~ or ~ystem, including waste reduction, waste
material recovery~ recycling as mandat~ by law or otherwise,
resourse recovery, wast~ incineration~ lap,fill operation, ash
management, sludge disposal from water and wastewater
t~ea~ent facilities, household hazardous waste manag~ent and
disposal and similar program or system, within one or more
of the political s~divisions which are me,ers of
~cupt a~ oth~zwi~ ~iovided in the following
sentence, the Authority mhall be an instr~entality exercisin~
public and essentia~ gover~unt=I ~unction~ tQ provid~ for
public health and welfare and, accordingly, the Authority
shall have all ~he authority and ail thos~ p~erm set ~rth
the Act or am th~ Act may h~rea~ter be ~ended. U~le~ the
Authozity~s me, ers unan~o=m~ vote 0rhenish, it shall not
~ an Authority purpose nor shell the Authority have ~y powe~
90-874 11/28/90
provided, however, ~hat this limitation shall not be 4eemed to
trsat~ent facilities. Furthsr, none of the powers ~ran~ed by
this Act which serve substantially the same purposem and area.
7. At the end e£ ~ack of its fiscal years, the
and recerds by an independent certified public accountant, to
standards emtablished by the Auditor of Publi= Accounts, as
r~ired D~ law, and a certified copy o~ same atoll be £iled
within ~hree (3) months thereof with the Auditor of ~ublic
Accounts and with the governing body of each of the partici-
pating political subdivisions.
$. k majority of m~mbers Of %h~ Authority ~hall
constitute a quorum, and the vote of a majority 9f members
shall be necessary for any aotio~ taken by th~ A%thozity,
participatin~ pc!i~ioat subdivisions shall be enti~le~ to no
%he n%~bex of members from each pa~ticipatin~ political
count¥~ Gi~or~L~W~ ~ e~
0 - ~0,00~ 1
50~001 - lOg,g00 2
lO0,OOi + 3
During the pre-incorporation period from Januar~ 1,
1990 ~hzough %he issuan=u uf ~he curtlfi¢=~e of
by the State Corporation Commission, the Authority shall be
fina~csd by the Richmon~ Regional Planning Dis%riot Commission
and the Crater Planning District Commission. The a~oumt of
the ~in~/%oin~ ~h~ll bs made availabl~ through s~e=ial per
capita d~¢~ assessed by the respective Pla~i~g District
Commissions on ~he ine0rporatin~ political subdivisions of
Authority. Th~e funds shall b~ umed tO pay OO~tZ incurred Dy
the respective Plannin~ District Commissions to organize and
incorporate the Authority an~ to support activities of the
Authorit~'s initial Board of Directors.
10. By the last day of Decenf0~r of the then current
fiscal year, the Authority shall develop and adop~, by an
affirmative vote of two-thirds {2/3) o~ the members, an ~nnual
budgs= (the "annual budget") for the subsequent fi=eel y~ar.
Th~ Authorit¥'s fiscal year shall be July 1 through June 30.
The annual budget shall be developed and proposa~ by the
Authority'a F~xecutive Director. The annual budget shall be
comprised o~ a genurat oper=~ing ~und (~e "~eneral operating
fu/%d") and of special project funds (the "special project
fund"). The AUthority's ~osts for administrative and opera-
~ional activities, including advertisement, gene=al planning,
education an~ the promotion of recycling and waste management,
shail be paid from f~nd~ in the general operating fund. The
general operating ~und for ~isoal year 1990-1991 shall
funded by contributions ~rom ~hs participating
jurisdictions at a rate of $0.50 per person per participating
political ju=isdictien [the "general operating fund contribu-
tion rate"~. The Authorit¥'~ Board may thereafter in,tease or
d~orea~e the general o~erating fund contribution rate by an
a~firmative .vote of three-fourths (3/4) Of the
members.
90~87~
Ii the Certificate of Incorporation i~ issued by the
State Corporation Co, lesion between January 1, t991, and June
30, 1991, the Authority shall adopt an annual budget for the
fiscal year dn/ly 1, 1991 - June ~0, 1992, by June 3Q, 1991,
the contributions tc which annual budget shall not eReee~
$8.50 per person per participating Dolitical subdivision.
Populatio~ totals to dutermine both tbs number of
Board members and tho ~snsral operating fund contribution rate
~hall be ba~ed ~pon either the most recent decennial ceneus or
the m~st r~o~nt final population estimates from tho center for
Pthblic Service, University of Virginia, whichever population
total is more current. Any increase or decrease to the number
o~ member~ on the Authority's Board allocated to a participa-
ting political subdivision eaused bya population shan~e shall
be effective sixty (60) days followLnq p~blication o~ the
population estimates re~erenced here~n.
1t. The Authority from time to time may operate certain
waste management projects (the "special projects") in one or
mor~ of the participating political subdivisions. Each
special project, including detailed planning~ advertisement
and promotion thereof, shall be ~un~ed un a basis separate and
apart from the Authorlty's general operating fund, ~xcept for
general ~und overhea~ costs allocable to each mpecLal project.
Each participating political jurisdiction may determine, in
its sole discretion, whnther to participate in any special
pioject. The foregoing notwithstanding, the Authority ~ay
contribute general oDar~tinu funds to special projects upon an
affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the An%hority's
members~ provided, however, that when a spuciaI project
becomes operative, any sums se contributed shall be zeimbureed
to the general operating fund. No Darticlpating political
j~ri~dic%ion shall impose or attempt to impose on the
Authority any host community fee or payment in lieu of tax
assessment rela~ing, to a specific ~roj~ot operated by tho
Authority.
12. contributions to =he Authority's initial general
0pa%sting fund for the fiscal year 199~-1991 are as follows:
Jurisdiction
chazle~ City ~ountF
Chester£ield Coug~y
Goochland County
Hanover County
Henries County
New Kent County
Powhatan Cowry
Prince George County
City of Colonial
Heights
City of Hepewsll
City e~ Petersburg
City Df Richmond
Town of Ashland
Per Person
1987 Per Year
PoDulatio~ /1990-1991) Tutal Costs
5,500 $ 0.5~ $ 3,250.~
179,400 0.50 89,700.0Q
13,300 0.50
51,540 0.50 25,770.00
202,000 O.50 ~Ol,OOO.O0
10,600 0.50 5,300.00
13,~50 0.50 6,800.00
26,700 0.50 13,350.00
17,300 0.50 8,650.00
24,200 0.50 12,100.00
40,~00 0.50 20,450.00
2~5,200 0.50 107,600.0~
~960 0.50 2,480,00
806,200 $403,100.00
13. Expenses ~rom the
operating fund for the fiscal
be as follows:
Authority'a initial general
yeaI 1990-1991 ~ze p=ojecte~ to
90-876 11/28/90
Aotivity
Dir~¢~ Sal~rie~
Fringe Benefits
A~CO%L~ti~g, legal and other consultants
F~r~iture, RguiRment, Automobile
$130~000.00
49,400.00
9,000.00
152,500.00
14,000.00
$403,100.00
The governing body O~ each incorporating political
subdivision hereby finds that a preliminary estimate of
capital costs, project proposals and project service rate
date of iiling these Articles of Incorporation.
14. Political Stt~divi~ions may join or withdzaw from the
Autherit~ in accordance with the regalirements of the Act.
15. The Board of Directors ma~ adopt ~tnd amend any and
all bylaws, rules and regulations, not in con~lict with these
Articles er the laws o~ the Commonwealth o~ Virginia, which
16. The Authority shall expire fifty (50) years from the
dat~ of issuane~ of its Certificate of Incorporation, unless
~xtended ax provided by the Act.
17. These Articl~ may be amanda4 in the manner
prescribed by the Act or by other applicable law,
BE IT FURTH~2~ RESOLVED, that this resolution sh~lI
take effect from the date of its adoption.
BE IT F~3RTHER RESOLV]ED, that thc Boa~ si SUpervisors
a~thorises and directs the county Administrator to
necessar~ docu~=nts to im~lum=~t this resolution subject to
a~p~oval of such documents as to form by ~he Coun~ Attorney.
~1- NEW BUSINESS
11.D.
ll.B.1. CH~'.ul~ad~J'~r.~ CO~l~J~l-l'f SERVICES BOARD
On motion of Mr. Mayer, seconded by Mr. Sullivaa, %he Board
nominated Mr. Peter C. Ward, Midlc~hian District; Ers. Bett~
~. ~v~rly, ~ermuda Die,tlc%; ~n~ M-rs. Patri¢ia Y. Bsrinski,
Matoaoa District; for reaI~pointment to serve u three (3) year
~urm on th~ Co,unity Services ~oazd, whose ~urmal rea~point-
m~nts will ba made on December 12, 1990.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.B.2. ~n~9'rm~Fl~r.D COUNTY AIRI~RT ADVISORY BOARD
O~ ~otion Of M~. Ma~es, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
suspended its rules to simultaneously nominate/appoint a
r=presentutive for the Matoaca District to serve on the
Chesterfield County Air~srt Advisory soard to fulfill the
unexpired term of Mr. John ~azza, Sr.
90-877 11/28/90
On motion of Mr. ~ayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the ~oard
simultaneously nomina=ed/aDDointed ~. John Mazza, Jr.,
represe~tiBg the ~toaca District, to serve on the Chester-
~ield County Airport Advlsor~; Board, whose term is effective
immediately and ex~ires February 14, 1992.
Vote: Unanimous.
Mzt May~ nominate~ ~r. John Mazza~ Jr. to fulfill
un~ired term of ~. John ~zza, Sr. There was no second.
Mr. Sulliv~ stated he felt ~t ~p~rtant that there be more
r~Dres~n~ati0~ ~ the Board of Supervisor~ on the Capital
Region Airart co~ission and n~inat~ Mr, O. F. coffin, Jr.
to fulfill the une~ire~ t~ 0f Mr. John Mazza, S=.
Applegata seconded the motion.
0n motion of Mr. ~ulliv~, seconded by Mr. Apple~ate, the
th~ Capital Region Al/port Co, lesion.
Mr. Daniel s~gg~$t~d the rules be waived in order to
simultane0u~ly n~inate/appoint a nominee t0 se~ on
Board. Mr. ~yes stated he could mot support waiving th~
rules. Mr. Nicas indicated ~tated ~ai6 n~n~es would be
vote~ upon in ~he order n~inated at th~ Dec,er 12, 1990
meeting.
ll.C. CONSE]~T IT~hS
STATE ROAD
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon him
examination of Greenbriar Drive~ Extort Lane and Edentcn Place
in Greenbriar, section 5 and a portion of Section 3 in Matoaca
District.
Upon consideration wheruof, a~d on ~otio~ of Nr. Applegate~
seconded by ~r. Sullivan, it is resolved tha= ~reenbriar
Drive, ~xton Lane and Frlenton Place in Matoacu District, be
and they hereby are established as public roads.
And he it ~urther resolved, that the Virginia DeDartmsnt
Transportation, b~ and it hereby ia r~qu~t~d to take into
Becondary ~yst~m, Green]~riar Drive, beginn{ng at the inter-
~ection with Overbridge Drive, State Route 1199, and going
northwesterl~ 0.06 mile to the intersection with Exton Lane,
and continuing northwesterly 0.07 to the intersection with
Edenton Place, and continuing northweeterl~ 0.~5 mile to end
in a ~ea~ en~; Extort Lane, be~innia~ ~% %he intersection with
Greenbriar Drive and going easterly ~.15 mite to end in a
cul-de-sac, a~ain, Exton Lane, ~eginn/ng at the
with Greer~briar D~ive and going westerly 8.0~ mile to end in a
cul-de-sac: and Kdenton Place, beginning at the intersection
cul-de-sac, again, Edenton Place, beginning at the inter-
section with Greenbriar Drive and g0inq westerly 0.10 mile to
end in a cul-de-sac.
90-87~ 11/28/90
distance and designated Virginia Department of Tr~nsp0rtati0n
These roads serve 52 lots.
And be it further re~olved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees ~o the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for these roads.
These sections of Greenbrier are recorded as follows:
Suction 5. Plat Book 62, Pages 65 & 66, August 16, 1988.
section 3. Plat Book 20, Pages 67 & 6~, June 12, t973.
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
dizeetion~ from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Five Springs Bead in Five springs, Phase ~I,
Clover Hill District.
Upon consideration whereof, a~d on motion of Mr. Applegate,
au¢onded by Mr. Sullivan, i~ is resolved ~hat Five Sprin~s
Road in Fiv~ Springs, Pha~e II, Clover ~itl District, be a~d
it hereby is established as public a road.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia D~partment of
Transportation, b~ and it hereby is reques~e~ to tek~ in=o the
secondary System, Five springs Road, beginning at existing
Five Springs Road, ~ta~e Route 2937, and going northeasterly
0.02 mile to the intersection with itself~ then continuing
northeasterly 0.01 mile, then turning and going northerly
mile, then turning and going northwesterly 0.01 mile, then
turning and going southwesterly 0.01 mile, then turning and
WPI~REAS, The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)
has developed a design for the widening of CoUrthou~ Roud
between Route 360 and Powhite Parkway.
~OW, 57HEREFOttE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Che~te~iel~
County Board of Supervisors supports VDOT'e plans to widen
Courthouse Road.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board urges VDOT to
proceed with the widening as quickly as possible.
AND BEST MANA~T PRACTTCE FACiLITIES
DEVELOP~T~R~OWNAS "B~£~RADE PLANTATION
On motion of ~. Apptegate, second=d b~ ~. sulliv~, the
~uard authorized ~he County A~inia~ratur to execute an
and Best Mana~emen= Practice Facilltiea with the developer of
"Bellgrade Plantation", with t~ County's only involve~9~
bein~ to assure %hat the maintenance agre~ent is being
with the papers of this Board.)
11.C.3. TRANS=~ OF lZ~NDS FOR CO~$T~U~TION OF F~CING AT
B~R~-J~HEI~TARYSC~OOL
On motion cf Mr. Applegate, seconded
by Mr.
Sullivan, the
11/28/90
Board transferred $1,600 from the Dale District Tbmee Cent
Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department's Beulah
Elementary School Project account for the installation of
approximately 130 feet of seourity fencing along the school
property line adjacent to BoDkins Road for the pro~ection of
the school children playing in the area,
Vote: Unanimous
11.C.4. AWARD OF' C(INT~ACT TO LOW BIDD~I~ FOR i~E~OVATION WORK
IN VACATKu COURT~ ~
On ~otien of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the
Board awarded a coRt~ae~ ko J~mcs Fox and Sons, Inc., in the
amount ef $353,7SO.Q0, for the demolition, renovation and
CORStXuc~ion of a new public meeting room in the 1967 portion
of the old Courts area, which room will b~ u~ed by the Board
of Supervisors, Plarmin~ Cemisslon, Board cf Zoning Appeals
and other public boards and commissions; and authoxlze~ the
Count~ Adm/nistrator to e~eoute the neoessary docUments ~or
said contract.
Vote: Unan~moun
11.C.5. RESOLL"I~ON SL~PPORTIN~] COURTHOUSE ~ WID~INS F~O~
~OUTE 360 TO~TEpi%~KWAY
On motion e~ Mr. Applegate, sesond~d by Mr. Sullivan, the
Board adopted the following resolutionz
~AS, Courthous~ Road is a major nexth-se%th arterial
in the County; and
WHEREAS, 5~he volume of traffic utilizing Courthouse Road
can no le~ger bo ac¢omm~ated in a safe and effioient manner;
and
WEERBAS, The widening of Courthouse Read
~E~, ~e Virginia Depar~ent of Tra~s~rtation (~]
has d~velop~d a dexign for the wide~iBg o~ Courthouse Ro~
~tween Rou~e 360 and Powhite Parkway.
N~, ~FO~ BE IT RESOLED, tha= the Chesterfield
Count~ Board of Supervisors supports ~OT's plans to widen
Courthouse Road.
BE IT FURTH~ RESOLVED, that tho Board ur~s ~OT to
pzooeed with %he widening as ~ickly as possible.
Vote~ Unanimous
11.C.6. I~I/R~TS FOR BIN~O/RAFFI~I~IT$
On motion of Mr- Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the
Board approved requests for bingo/~a~le permits for the
~ollowing organizations fox the calendar y~ar
~anchu~t=r-Ric~und L~e ~699
Monacan Athletic Boo~ter~
Foreign wars of U.S. Bingo/Raffle 1991
Providence ~uilters Raffle 1990
90-880 11/28/90
RATIFICATION OF AI~IEI, IDNEII~S '1'0 ~ BY-LA~ OF
GREA'£r~RICHMONDTRANSITCOS~A~Y
On motion of Mr. ~pple~at~, seconded by Mr. ~llivan, the
Board ratified a~tion of the Greater Ric~ond Transit C~pany
~oard of Directors to ~end the GRTC By-Laws~ pursuant
Article IX~ Section 1,
third Tuesday to the third Wednesday of every ~o~$h~ ~d
Change the annual meetin9 of the GRTC Boar~ from the
second ~onday of October to the third Wednesday of
October.
(It is noted a copy of said amendments are
papers Of this Board.)
filed with
ll.D.l.a. A POKTION OF C-~TE~FI~r~ AVEbVJE
On motion u~ N~. ~ayes, sacon~m~ by ~r. Apple~ate, the Board
directed staff to proceed with contacting residents/businesses
Avenue in the Villag~ of ~ttrick to determine an appropriate
name for same.
Vote= Unanimous
B~RY WOODS SUBDIVISIONS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the
B~a~d directed staff to change the nam~ of ~ighberr~ Woo~$
Lane to ~eadnw chase Lane, which road is approximately 300
feet in length and is a connecting mtreet between ~ighbe~ry
Wo~s and ~ea~ow Chaae Subdlvizlon~. Iii is noted staff has
received a copy of a letter £rom the ~evelo~er confirming that
he agro~ with the nam~ change as r~qu~t~d by the builder~
and a copy o~ the subdivlslo~ pl~t is filed with thu papers of
this Board.)
i1.D.2. ~T~ut~'i' LI~T~UE~T
On motion of Mr. Curria, seconded by ~r. Applegate, the Board
a~rove~ obtaining a cost estimate for %h~ i~tallation of a
street light at the =ul-de-sa= of Richmond Street, Bgrmu~a
District.
90-881
ll.R.1. APPROVAY, OF WA~'rJ~Fa'r~a CCiFI'R~CT FI)I{. RI'V]~~':: B~ID
STATION Os'r~ALL 5l~qli~ AND i~3RCE MAIN FRC~ RI%~'S BEND
- SECTION 6 'i"0 ~or,.~ 295
Mr. Currin disclosed to the Beard ~ha~ he i~ part owner e~ the
subject p~operty, d~clared a conflict of interest pursuant
to tko Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and
excused himself from the meeting.
On motion of ~Lr. Applegate, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
90~0486, River's Bend ~hnnp ~tation Out£ait Sewer
Force Main from River's Bend - Section 6 to Route 295~
Contractor: Castle Equipment Company
Contract Amount: ~sti~at~d Total - $402,126.94
Wa~=ewauor (C~ersizing) $ 9,527.~2
(Refund thru connections)
Estimated Developer Cos~: $]~2,$99.42
ll.E.2. CC~SE~T I~
11.E.2.a. ~0DIFICATIC~ TO '~'~ SCOPE OF ~GINERRING $~Sr/CES TO
PROVIDED ITl R. STUART ROI,~ER & ASSOC~ FC~ 'r~u~
P]~0C'I'OR~$ ~ WA~fI'EWATER ~ PLANT El[PAl, fSI.ON
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. sullivan, the
Board approv$~ ~o~i~ioation to the scope o~ engineering
services to be provided by ~. Stuart Rcyer & A~soeiates ~or
the ~rootor's Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant ExPansio~
Project and authorized the County Administrator to e~ecute the
~eoessary documents, (It is no,ed funding is provided in
Capital Impro¥cment Budget.)
Vote:
ll.~.t.~. ACCF~TANCE OF pA~X~RT~ OF LAND
ll.R.2.b.1. ALON~ OD BE~]DA ~ ROAD ~ B~t~DFO~D
RgC~., ~C.
0n motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the
Beard accepted on behalf of the County the conve~anc~ of a
0.14 acre parcel of la~d along 01d Bermuda Hundred Road ~rom
Bradford Bros., Inc., A North Carolina Corporation, and
authorized %he County Administrator to execute t~e necessary
deed. (A copy of said plat is filed with the papers of thi~
Bcar~.)
Vote: Unanimous
On motion cf Mr. ApDleg&te, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the
Board accepted on behalf of the County thc conveyance cf a
8.073 acre parcel of land along ~ull Street Road f~o~ ~r.
11/2s/9o
Robert A. Corhner and Ms. Mar~ Bradley Conner, and autherized
the County Administrator to execute the necessary ~eed, (A
copy o~ said plat is filed with the paDsra of this Board.)
I1.E-2-b.3- A~ON~ ~3LL STP3~T ROAD F~0M NR. A~ ~. ~%ROLD F.
On motion of Mr. A~pl~pat~, seconded by NY. SullivaA, the
0.023 acre parcel of land along ~ull Street Road from
authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessar~
deed. IA copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this
11.E.Z.b.4- ALONG ~u~.n S~tKET ROAD FR0~ BP~D~Ey I~TME~TS,
On motion of FLr. A~plegate, seconded by Wt. Sullivan, the
Board accepted on ~eha~f of ~hu county %he conveyance of a
1.059 acre parcel of land along Hull Street Road ~rom Bradley
Inve~=ments L~., A Maryland Co~poratio~, aad authorized the
C~unty Administrator to execute the necessary deed. (A espy
Vote: 'Unanimous
ll,E.2.co RF~UEST FOR ~ERMISSION TO ~CT A DRIV~AY WITH-
tN A~ ~xr~TI~G 2~ FOOT F~GHT-O~-WAY ~OW~ A~ ~tl~K-
On motion of 555. Applegate, seconded by 5Lt. Daniel, the Board
denied a request from Nr. Barney MoLaughlin for permission to
construct a driveway to ~i~ ~o~e At 303 E~O~ C~rch Road
within an existin~ 25 foot unimproved right-of-way known a~
Riverview' Road, in Cameron Farm~ Subdivision, a~ Mr.
McLaughlin has ne recorded access to Enen Church Road from the
termination of the propose~ driveway, and construction of ~he
driveway may cause the use o9 an existing private driveway by
th~ public.
water and sewer contracts executed by the County
~r. Ramsey presented the Board with a status repor~ on the
~eneral Fund Contingency Aoceunt, General Fund Balance,
9. DBFE~ED ITEMS (continued)
9.A. ~JBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDE~ A~DING '£~ FYgl COUNTY
F4DGETTOAPPROi~RIATE $47rZ75rO00 IN BO~DPHOC~AND
MT. R~ey s~itt~d copies of the ~inancial data p~rtaining
to the ~A2,190,000 appropriation fo~ achool projuctu
re~ested ~ Mr. Daniel earlie~ in the meeting, copies of
which ar~ ~il~ with the papars of this Board. Mr. Danial
clarified his understanding of the data presented to h~ and
indicated he wished the minutes to re~lec= that o~ the
$~,190,000.00 appropriation for th~ schools that th~
intention is =hat said ~oun~s be expended as follows~ $24.8
million for the new Manchester High School; $1L.5 million for
specified air conditioning projects at Bon Air, Chalkley,
Grange ~all, ~arrowgate, ~ening ~d Watkins El~entary
Sohools; and $5.9 million to pay ~or miscellaneous
that are already well under oonstruction such a~ Bailey Bridge
Nanchester, Matoa~a, ~eadowbrook ~d Thomas Dale High Schools,
with the balance of thc projects to b~ completed at = later
that was correct.
0n motion of Mr. ~ullivan, seconded by ~. Daniel, the Board
appropriated $47,275,000, with $42,190,000 for School
projectS; $4,93~,000 for County projects; an4 ~150,00~ in bond
~aauance a~end~tures and adopted the following resolution,
Supervisors fo~ard to the C~i~an of the ~chool Board a
lett=r o~flcially notifying them o~ this Bo=rd's streng
protust of th~ manner in which this issue was ~ndled and
~his Boar~ will not tulurat= this t~u a=tio~ in %he futur~:
C~x~I~, VIRG~A, ~R C~IT~ S~L ~~
~CIPA~ N~S ~ ~I~P~ION OF ~ ISSU~CE
~Z IT ~SOLV~ BY =~ ~ OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
CO~ OF CHES~IELD, VIRGINIA:
SECTION 1. Findinqs and Dete~inationa.
Pursuan~ =o Chap%er 5 of Title 15.1 of =he Code o~ Virqinia,
1950 (the s~e being the ~!i¢ Finance Aot~, an el~otion d~ly
called ~d held under the P~lic Finance Act in the Count~
chesterfield, Virginia [the "county"), on ~ove~er 8, 1988 and
an Order of the Circuit Court of the Co~ty dated Dec--ar
general obligation ~onds in %h~ m~im~ ~o~% of one h~dr~d
thirty-~ive m~ll~on nine hundred thousand dollars
($I35,900,000) fOX capital ~chool imp~ovemant~ p~o~ct~ in the
Couoty, including the acquisition of miter for fut~e school
construct~on.
(b) ~suant to Se=tion 1~.!-1~] of the
Finance Act, the School Board of the Co~ty on Dece~er 13,
1988 adopted a resolution recessing ~he Boar~ of ~uDeivisors
one h~dred thirty- five million n~ne hundred thous~d
($135,900,000~ ~or capital school improvumunt projeots in the
afor~entioned election held on Wove~er 8, 1988.
(c) The Board cf Supervisors deems it advisable and
in the best i~herests of ~he County tu authorize and provide
twenty-sight million two hundred thirteen thousand ~ellars
{$28,213,Q00) aggregate principal amount of general obligation
bonds authorized for issuance by the voters of the County at
November 8, 1988. The proceeds of sale of such general
obligation bonds shall be applied to finance the coats cf
capital improvement projects of a~d £or the County. The
general oblige=ion bonds authorized for issuance hsreby shall
be in addition to the general obligation bonds ~or capital
school impr~vsmsnt projects authorized for is~ua/%oe but
unissued pursuant to the resolution adopted by the Board of
supervisors on October 11, 1989,
SECTION 2. Authorization of Bonds. For the purpose
in the County, as authorized by the voters of the County at
the election held in the Coumty on ~ovember 8, 1988, there are
hereby authorized to be issued, sold and delivered an issue of
twenty-eight million two hundred thirteen thousand dollars
($28,213,000) principal amount cf general obligation bonds of
the County to be designated and known as "Bublic Improvement
Bonds" (hereinafter referred to as the "Bonds"). ~e
shall be i~sued and sold in t~eir entirety at cna time, or
Erom time to time in part in serieg~ as ~hall b~ determlaed by
the County Administrator of the County. The Bonds may be sold
at the same tame as other general obligation bondm are sold by
the County. The Bonds shall bear interest at such rate or
rates per annum as shall be specified in the bid accepte~ by
subsequent r~solution of the Board of supervisors for the
purchase of the BoRds of such series, if any bid therefor be
accepted. The County Administrator is authorized to
determine, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of
this ruaolution: whether the Bonds of any series shall be in
denominations of the Bonds; the method of n%k~bering the Bonds;
thereof; the recor~ dates for the payment of interest thereon;
the maturity dates thereof; the amount cf principal maturing
on each maturity date~ the place or place~ of payment thereof
and the paying agent sr paying agents therefor: the place or
pl~es o~ registration, ezch~nge or transfer ~nd the registrar
therefor; slid whether or not the Bonds shall be subject to
redemption prior to their stated maturity Or mat~ities and if
subject ~o such redemption, the premium, if any, payable upon
such redemption and the respective p~riods in which such
premiums are payable.
SECTION 3. Appointment of Registrar; ~a~ent
Bondz; Books of Registr¥~ Exchanges and Trana~ra of Bondz.
(s) Appoiatment c~ Registrar. S~bject to the
approval of the ~o~rd of Supervisors by subsequent resolution
adopted on the date o~ sale o~ the Bonds, the
Administrator is here~y authorized to select, for each aeries
of Bonds, the registrar ~or the Bonds of such
(hereinafter referr~ tO aS the "Regimtrar"), which Registrar
may be the County Treasurer.
(b] Pa~f~ent 0i Bonds. (i) At any time during
which the Bonds of any series shall hu in fully registered
form, the inter~st on the Bonds of such series shall be
payable b~ check or draf~ mailed by tbs Registrar to the
registsred owners of the Bonds of s~ch series at ~heir
addresses aa the same a~pear on the books of registry as of
the r~¢ord date for the payment of in%erect on the Bonds of
such series, and the ~rinciDal of and premium, if any, on
Bonds shall be parable at ~he principal office of the
Registrar.
[ii) At any time during which the Bonds of
series shall be in book-entry farm, the principal of and
premium, if any, and interest on the Bomds of such series
shall be payable in accordance with the arrangements made with
(iii) ~he principal of and premium, if any, and
interest on the Bonds ~hall be payable in such coin or
currency of the United states of America as at the respective
dates o~ palnnent is legal tender for public and private debts.
(c) Books of Registry; Exch~nge~ and Transfers of
Bonds. (i) At all time~ during which anF Bond remains
outstanding and unpaid, the Registrar shall keep or cause
be kept at its principal office, booke of regintry for the
registration, exchange a~d transfer of the Bonds. Upon
presentation at the principal of Cice of the Regietr~Lr for much
purpose, the Registrar, under such reasonable r~gulaticns as
it ma~ prescribe, shall register, exchange, transtar, or cause
to be registered, exchanged o~ transferred, on the books of
registry the Bonds as herein se% forth; p~evided, however,
that the Registrar shall not be required =o de so with respect
%o any Bond after the close of business on the forty-fifth
145th) day next preceding any date fixed for the redemption of
(ii] Any Bond ma~ be exchanged at the principal
office of the Registrar for a like aggregate principal amount
of Bonds in other authorised prinsipal amounts of ~he
interest rate and maturity.
[iii) Any Bond may, in accordance with its terms, be
tranmferred upon the books of registry b~ the person in whose
name it is r~gistered, in person or b~ hi~ duly authorized
duly executed by the registere~ owner in person or his duly
authorized agent, in form satisfactory to the Registrar.
{iv) All transfers or exchanges p~rmu~nt to this
Section 3(c) shall be made without erpenee te the registered
except that the Regixtrar shall require palrment by the
rsgimtered ~wner o~ the Bond ~e~uesting such transfer or
(v~ All Bonds surrendered pursuant to this Section
SECT!O~ 4. Redemp%io~ of
(a) Provisions for Redemption. Subject to the
approval of the Board of Supervisors by subsequent resolution
adopted on the date of sale of the Bends, the County
redemption of the Bonds.
(b) Notice o~ Redemption. Notice of any such
redemption shall be mailed not less than thirty (30) days
prior to the date fixed ~or redemp=icn by ~irst class mail,
postage prepaid, to the registered owner of the Bonds to be
numbers and maturities of the Bends to he redeemed, the date
and place fixed for thai= redemption and the premium, if any,
paTable upon such redemption, and if less than the entire
principal amount of any Bond is to be redeemed, that such Bond
must be snrrendered in exchange for the principal amount
m
equalling in principal amount that portion of the principal
amount thereof not redeemed~ and shall also state that upon
payable upon each Bond called for redemption the principal
amount to be redeemed together with the applicable redemption
premium, if anyr and the interest accrued on such principal
amoul/t to the date fixed for redemption, and that from and
after such date interest on such principal amount shall cease
(el Effect of Redemption. When notice of
redemption of any Bond shall have been given as herelnak~ve
act forth~ ~ueh BOnd (or the principal a~ount thereof to be
redeemed) shall be~om~ due and payabls on the redemption date
specified in much not,ce at a price equal to the principal
a~eu~t ~hereof and redemption premium, if any, thereon,
together with the interest accrued on such Bond (or on the
Whomever payment of much iede~ptio~ price shall have be~n
made or provided for, intmrmmt on the Bond (er on the
principal a~ou~t thereof to he redeemed) so called for
redemption shall cease to accrue from and after the date so
speeilied ~or redemption,
cancelled and not reissued.
SECTIO~ 5. Execution and Authentication of Bond~
CUSIP
(a) Execution of Bonds. The Bonds shall be
exse~ted in thz n~me of the Country b~ the man~l or facs~nile
signature of the Chairman uf ~he ~card of Supervisors, and the
corporate ~eal o! the Dear4 o~ ~upervisor~ ~hall be impress~,
or a facsimile thereof printed, on the Bends, attested by the
manual or facsimile mignatu~e of the Clerk of the Board of
supervisors, neither Of which signatur~ is required to be
manual.
(b) Authentication of Bonds. The County
Administrator shall direct the Registrar to authenticate the
Bonds and no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose
unless and u~til th= certificate of a~thenti¢~tion u~dorued on
ouch Bond ehall have been m~nually executed by an authorized
signator of the Registrar. Upon the authentication of any
Bond, the Registrar shall insert in the certificate of
authentication the date as of which such Bond is authenticated
as follows: (i) il t~e Bond is authenticated Drier to the
firs= interes~ payment date, tho certificate shall he da~e~ as
of the date the Bonds are delivered to and paid for by the
initial purchasers thereoi~ [ii~ ii the Dead is authenticated
upon an interest payment date, the certificate shall be dated
as of such interest payment date; (iii) if the Bond is
authenticatmd on or after the record date for the pe!~ment of
interest on the Bonde and prior to such interest parakeet
the certificate ~hall be dated as of s~ch interest payment
date~ and (iv) in all other i~s~ansus, the certificate shall
~e dated the date upon which the Bond is authenticated. The
u~uou~ien and authentication of ~he ~onds in ~he manaer above
set forth is adopted as a due and sufficient authentication of
the
(c) CUSIP Identification Num~mre. CUSIP i~entifi-
cation num~ers may be printed on the Bonds, but neither the
failure to print any such number on any Bonds, nor any error
or omission with r~spect thereto, shall constitute cause for
~ailure or refusal b~ the successful bidder for the Bonds to
accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds in accordance with
the terms of its proposal to purchase the Bonde. NO ouch
or a part of the contract evidenced thereby and no liability
90-887 11/28/90
shall attach to the County or any of its officers or agents
thereof.
SECTION 6. Tax Covenant. The County covenants and
141-150 of the Inter,al Revenue Code of 1986 and the
applicable Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder
throughout the term of th~
$~CTION 7. Sources of ~ayment of Rond~. q~ne full
faith and credit of the CountW shall be and is hereby
i~revocably pledged to the pu-~ctual payment o~ th~ principal
of a~d interest o~ the Bo~s a~ the ~ame become due. There
shall be levied and collected annually, at the same time and
in the same manner as other taxes are assessed, levied and
~elleoted, ad valorem taxe~ without limitation as to rate or
amount, sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal
of and interes~ on the Bonds as the same respectively become
due and pawable.
SECTION 8. Form of
substantially the ~orm set ~erth k~lcw with ~uch ~ecessary er
appropriate variations, omimmionm and insertions as are
incidental to their numbers, interest rates
as are otherwise permitte~ or required by law or
resolution:
UNITED STATUES OF AF~ERICA
C0MM0~EALTH OF VIRGINIA
COUN%~/ OF CHESTERFIELD
PUBLIC iMPROVE~T BOND
SERIES OF
No. R-
INTEREST RA~E: MA~3RITY DATE: ORISINAL ISSUE DATE:
RR~IRTERF~OWNER:
REGISTERED
The County of Chesterfield (hereinafter ~e~erred =o
s~ the "County"), a political subdivision o~ the Commonwealth
of virginia, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the
Registered Owner (name~ ~v~}, or regiKt~r~d a~mlgns, on the
Maturity Date (~pec~fied abeve), unless this Bond shall have
r~demptien price shall have been duly made or provided for,
the ~ri~¢ipal Amount (sDeclfied above], and to pay interest on
~uch Principal Amount on 19 and semiannuall~
hereof or from the imterest payment date next precedinq the
date of authenti~atien hereof to which interest shall have
been paid, unless such date of authentication is an interest
payment date, in which name ~rom such interest ~a!rment date if
interest has b~en paid to such ~ate, or unle~ such date of
authentication is within the period from [insert appropriate
lan~uaqe depending on whether interest ~ayment date is first
er fifteenth day of calendar month] to ~uoh interest payment
date, in which case from such interest pa!~ment ~ate if
interest has been paid to such date, until the payment of such
Principal Amount [each such date is hereinafter referred to a~
an interest payment dat~) at the Interest Rate (specified
above) ~er annum, by check er ~ra~: mailed by the Registrar
hereinafter mentioned to the Registered Owner hereof at his
address as it appears on the book~ of registry kept ~f the
90-888 11/28/90
Registrar, at the close of business on [insert appropriate
language depending on whether inter,st palrmant date is first
~ne principal of and premium, if any, on this Bond
are payable upon presentation and surrender hereof at the
principal office of in the __ of ,
(the "Registrar"). The principal of and premium, if
any, and interest on this Bond are payabla in such coin or
da~e~ of payment is legal tender for p~li~ and priva%~ debts.
(herein referred tO a8 the "Bond~") o~ the aggregate principal
Dollars ($ .) of like date and tenor herewith~
except for number, ~enominatien, i~texest rate, maturity and
redemption provisions, and i~ i~sued for thc purpose of
financing the costs of various oapit~l improvem~nt ~roj~¢t$ in
amd for the County, under and pursuant to and in full
compliance with the Constitution and statute~ o~ the
Commonwealth of virginia, including Chapter 5 of Title 15~1 of
t~e Code of v~rginia, 1950 (the same being t~he Pu~li~ Finance
Act), a_u election ~uly held in the County under such Chapter 5
on Mercier 8, 1988, and resolutions duly adopted by the Board
of Sup~rvis0rs of the C~unt~ under such Chapter 5 on
and
~ject to redemption prior to their stated mat~itiem. The
portions thereof in installments of $5,000) makuri~g On and
option of t~e County prior to their stated maturities on or
after , in whol~ at any tim~, or in par~ ~Iom ~i~e ~o
t~ on any interest pa~ent date in much order aa may bc
=11 of the BO~d$ O~ a mat~ity are called ~or red~ption, the
pazticular Bon~ or portions thereo~ to be rede~d s~ll ~
foll~ing red~ptiun priOe~ (expressed as a percentage of the
~rinciDal ~o~ of Bonds to be .redeemed), together wi~h the
interest accrued on ~uch principal ~o~t to the date fixed
Redemption Dates · Red~ion ~:ic~
%
Ii this Bo~d cz any portion of the principal a~ount
hereof shall bs called for redemption, notice of the
redemption ~ereof, specifying the d~te, number and maturit~of
this Bond, the date and place or places fixed for it~
redemption, the premium, if any, payable upo~ such r~dsmpti0n,
and if less than the entire principal amount of this Bond is
tn be redeemed, that this Bond must be surrendered in exchange
for the principal amount hereof to bu reduumed and the
issuance of a new Bcn~ equalling in principal amount that
portion of the principal amount hereof not reduumud, shall be
mailed not less th~n thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed
for redemption by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the
Registered Owner of this men~ at his ad4resa as it appear= on
the book~ of r~istry kept by the Registrar. If notice of
redemption of this Bond shall have been given as aforesaid,
and payment o~ the principal ~mount of thi~ Bond (or the
portion of the principal amount hereo~ t~ be redeemed) and o~
the accrued interest and premium, if amy, payable upon much
redemption shall have been duly made or provided for, interest
hereon (or on th~ purtio~ o£ the principal amou/lt hereof to be
11/28/90
redeemed) shall cease from and after the date so specified
redemption.
Subject to the limitations an~ uDon paymen~ of the
ehar~e~, if a~y, provided in the proceedings authorizing the
Bonds of the series cf which this Bend is one, this Bend may
be exchanged at the principal office of the Registrar for a
which this Bond is one, of other authorized principal
o~ the same interest rate and msturity. This Bond is
his attorney dul~ authorized in writing, at the principal
o~ice of the Registrar but only in th~ manner, subject to
limitations and upon payment of the oharges, if any, provided
in the proceedings authorizing the Bends of the ~ries cf
which this Bond is one, and upon the surrender h~roof for
cancellation. Upon such transfer, a new Bond or Bonds of the
series of which this Bond is one, of authorized denominations
and of th~ same aggregate principal amount, will be issued to
the trunsf~ree iH exchange herefor. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Registrar shall not be required to exchang~ or
transfer this Bond later than the clos~ of b~sine~n on the
forty-f~fth (45th) ~ay nex~ preceding any da~e fixed for the
r~dempt~on of this Bond or any portion hereof.
The full faith and credit of the County are hereh~
irrevocably pledged to thn payment of the principal of and
intereN~ e~ ~hiN ~ond aN th~ ~a~o b~om~ due.
This Bond shall not be valid ur obligatory unless
the certificate of authentication h~reon ~hall have been
manually signed by an authorized signator of thc
It is hereby certified, recited and dectare~ that
ail acts, oo~ditioDs ~d things requ/red to have happened, to
exist and to have been performed precedent to and in the
issuance of thin 'Bond and ~he series of which it is one, do
exist, have happened and have been performed in re~ular and
due ~ime, fexT~ and manner as requlre4 b~ law, and that this
Bond and the Bonds of the series of which thi~ Bond is one do
not sxoee~ a~y constitutional or Ntatuto~ limitation of
IN WITNESS WHEP~EOF, the County~ by its Board of
Supervisors, h~s Gaue~ this Bond to be executed by ~he manual
or facslmile signature of the Chairman of s~eh Board; a
facsimile of the corporate ~aal o~ such Board ~e t~ imprinUed
hereon, attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the
Clerk of such Board~ and this Bond he be date~ as of
, 19__.
[S~AL3
Attest:
Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors
chairman of the Beard of
Supervisors
CERtIFICATE OF Au-x=u=%TICATI(X~
This Bond is eno uf the Bonds delivered pursuant to
the within-mentioned
90-890
], Registrar
Authorized $ignator
11/28/90
Date Of ~th~nticaticn:
ASSI~a~T
FOr value ~eceived, the undersigned hereby
assign(s) and transfer(s)
~ip code, cf transferee)
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY
OF TPJ~NSFEREE:
the within Bond and alt ri~ht~ thereunder, and
irr6vocably constitutes and a~o£nts
attorney, to tnansfer s~ch Bond on the book~ kept for
registration thereof, with full power si substitution in the
pr~mises.
NOTICE: Signature(s) must be
The New York Stock Exchanqe,
Inc. or a com~ercial bank or
trust company.
{$i~nature(~) of Reui~%e~ed
Owner)
NOTICe: The ~ignature(~)
above must currespun~ wi~h
the name o~ the Registered
Owner as it aDDears on th~
front cf this Bond in every
particular, without altera-
tion Or enlargement or any
ohan~e whatsoever.
$~CTION 9. Sale of Bonds. The County Administrator
is he~eb~ authoxized to onus9 to be published and distributed
a summary ~otise of Sal~ and/or Detailed Notice of Sale uf the
~onds and to cause to be distributed to Drospective purchasers
of and investors in the Bonds such Sur~ary Notiu~ of Sal~
aRd/or De,ailed Notice of Sale~ a form of Proposal ~or the
purchase of the Bun~a an~ & Preliminary Official statement o~
the Count~ relating to the Bon~s~
SECTION 16. Bond Anticipation Notes. (al General
obligation public imDrovement bond anticipation not~ of the
fifteen million ($15,00Q~000}, to be designated and known as
"General oblige%ion ~bli¢ Improv~ment Bon~ Anticipation ~otes
{h~reinufter referred to as the "Notes"), are authorized for
issuanc~ of the Bonds authorized for issuance herein. The
provisions of Section 15.1-223 of tko Code of Virginia, 1950.
The Notes shall mature and be payable within two ~ears from
their date and ahall be SOI~ at competitive o~ nG~otiat~d ~ate
at not less than Dar Dlu~ aocruod interost and on such other
ter~ and conditions a~ are determined by th~ CoD/try
Administrator, Drov~ded that no Note shall bear interemt at a
subject to redemption at a premium ~reater than three per
centum [' 3% ) of the ~rincipal ~ount thereof. Bo~ds in
90-891 11/28/90
anticipation cf which the Nates are issued pursuant to this
Section 16 shall be issued and sold in accordance with the
provisions o~ thi~ resolution at any t~me within ~ive (5)
years of the date of issuance of ~he firs% Notes issued in
a~ti~ipation of the
(b) If the Notes are offered for C0mpetitivo sale,
a $~ary Notice of Bale and/or Detailed Notice of Sale shall
be prepared, published and distributed, a~d a for~ of Proposal
for purchase prepared and distrlbuted~ in accordance with
Section 9 hereof. There is also authorized to De prepared and
distributed in accordance with Section 9 hereof a preliminary
and final official Statement relating to the No=es in such
form as shall be approved by the County Administrator.
(c) The provi=ions o~ Sac=ions 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
hereof shall apply to the Notes to the same ex~ent the sa~e
apply ~o the Bo~ds, except: (s) in the casa of the
Of Section 2, the interest rate or rates on the Notes shall be
determined by the Count~ Administrator in acccr~nce with
further approval by the Beard of Supe~isors; (~) in the cane
may ~elect the Registrar for the NO,eS WithOUt fur=her
a99rov~l by %he Board of Supervisora~ (c) in the case of the
~rovisions of Section 3(c)(i). ~he Registrar shall nco
registered, exchanged o~ tra~sfurr~, on ~he books Of
portion thereof a~ tke C0~%~ k~inistrator shall dateline at
the tim~ of the Notes are issum~; (d) in =he ~aam Of
4(a), the provisions for the r~demption of the Notes shall
det~ine~ by the Co~%y A~inis~ra=or in accordance with ~d
s~ject to the provimionm of Section 10(a) h~r~0f without
~urther approval by ~he M~ard of SuDe~isurs; {e) in the case
of Section 4(b), nutic~ of r~de~ptio~ of any Note shall
mailed not less than such n~er of days as the Co~t2
A~ini~trator ~hall dateline at the t~e of the Notes are
issue~; and (d) in the case of the provision~ of See=ion
the s~e shall apply o~ly to the extent the Notes are not paid
from the proceeds of the Bonds OM fMOm =ny other
(d) The No%es shall b~ in s~s=antially the fo~
set ~orth below with sucA necessary ox appropriate v~iations.
omis~ion~ and in~ertiu~= a= are ineidmntal to ~heir n~er~
interest rates and maturities or as are othe~i~ peal=ted or
revised by law or thi~ r~solution~
~I~ STATES OF ~ICA
CO~O~E~ O~ VIRGINIA
CO~ OF
P~LIC IMPRO~T ~ ~ICIPATI~ N~
REGISTERED
No. R-
INTEREST RATE: MATURITY DATE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE:
REGISTEP~D OWNER:
~RINCIPAL AMOUNT:
REGISTERED
CUSIP NO:
The COU2lt¥ of ~hesterfield (hereinafter ra~erred to
as the "County"), a political subdivisio~ of ~he Co~onweatth
of Virginia, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the
11/18/90
Registered Owner (named above), or registered assigns, on the
Maturity Date (specified above), unless this Not~ shall have
redemption price shall have been duly made er provided for,
the Principal A~ou/lt (specified ~ove)~ and to pay interest on
such Principal Amount on , 19 and semiannually
on each an~ thuru~ter ~rom the d~t~
hereof or ~rom the interest payment date next preceding the
da~e of a=~ho~tication hereof to which interest shall have
been paid, unless such date of authentication is an interest
payment date, in which eas~ ~ro~ s~ah interest pa~lnent date if
interest ham been paid to such date, or unless such date of
authentication is within the period from [iu~ert appropriate
language depending on wh~ther interest payment date is first
date, in which case from such interest p=%au~nt d~te if
~ria¢ipal ~uuount (each such date is hereinafter referred to as
an interest pa~ment date) at the Interest P~ate {specified
at~ove) per annu~, by check or draft mailed by the Registrar
hereinafter mentioned tO the Registered Owner hereof at h~s
address as it appears on the books o~ registry kept by the
Registrar, at the close of business on [in,err appropriate
language depending on whether interest payment date is ~irst
or fifteenth day cf calendar month].
The principal of and premium, if any, on this Note
ar~ p~yable ~pon presentation and surrender hereof at the
principal office of in the __ of ,
(the ~'~gist~aI"}. ~e principal of and premium, if
any, and interest on ~his Note are payable in such coin ur
currency of =he United ~tates of America aa at the respective
dotes of pa~ment is legal tender for public and private debts.
This Note is one of = duly =uthoriued i~u~ of
Iherein referred to as the ~'Nete") of the a~regate principal
amount o~
Dollars ($ .) of like date and tenor herewith,
e~ept for number, ~enQmination, interest rata, maturity and
redemption previsions, and is issued, in anticipation of the
issuance of a like principal amount of general obligation
bonds of the County, fO~ the purpose of financing the cesta of
various capital improvement projects in and for the county,
under and pursuant to and in ~ull compliance with the
Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia,
including Chapter ~ of Titl~ 15.1 cf the code of Virgin/a,
1950 (the same being the P~lic Finance Act), an election dul~
hold in the County under e~ch Chapter ~ on ~ove~ber ~, 1988,
and a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisor~ of
the County under such Chapter 5 on
The Notes of the series of Notes of which this Note
is one maturing on or before , __ shall no~ be
subject to rede~tion prior to their stated maturities. The
Notes of the ~eries of Notes of which this Note i~ one (or
portions thereof in installments of $5,00~) maturing on and
after s~ll be subject ts redemption at the
option of the County prior to their stated maturities on or
after __, in whole at any time, or in Dart from time to
time on any in,ernst payment dat~ i~ such order as may be
determined by the County (except that if at any time less than
all of the Korea cf a maturity are called for redemption, the
particular ~otes er portions thcreo~ to bu red=emcd shall be
following rede~ptio~ prices (expressed as a percentage of the
principal amount of Nota~ to ~ redeemed), together with the
interest accrued on such principal amou~%t to the date fixed
for the r~d~pti~n thereof:
90-893 11/28/90
Redemptioa Dates Redemption Prices
If this Note er any port,on of the principal amount
hereof shall be called far redemption, netise of the
redemption hereof, specifying the date, nt~ber and maturity of
this Note, the date and ~laes or places fixed for its
redemption, the premium, if any, ~ayable upon such redemption,
to be redeem~t, that this Note must be surrendered in exchange
for %he principal amount hereof to be redeemed and the
issuance of a new Note equalling in principal amount
portion of the principal ~mouat hereo~ not redeemed, shall be
~sr redemption by f~r~t cla~ mail, pomtag~ prepaid, to the
Registered Owner of this Note at his address as it appears on
the ~eek~ of registr~ kept by the Registrar. I~ notice e~
re~emptlen of this Note shall have been given a= aforesaid,
and payment of the prinsipat amount o~ this Note (or the
portion Of the principal ~mou~t hereof to be redeemed) and of
the accrued interest and premium, if any, payable upon such
redemption shall have bees duly made cz provided fez, interest
hereon (or on the portion of the principal amount hereof to be
redemption.
Subject to the llmitationg and upon payment of the
charge~, if any, Dr0vided in t~e Droeeedinqs authorizing the
Notes of the series of which this Note iS one, this Note may
be exchanged at the principal office of the Registrar for
like aggregate principal amount si Notss of the series of
which this Note ia one, of other authorized principal amounts
Of the za~e interest rate and maturity. This Nots is
transferable by the Registered Owner hereof, in p~r~cn o~ by
his attorney duly authorized in writing, at the principal
office of the Re~i~t~a~ but only in the manner, subject to the
limitations and upon payment of th~ charges, if any, provided
in the proceedings authorizing th~ ~Ote~ O~ the s~ries of
which this Note is one, and upon the surrender hereof for
c~noellation. Upon such transfer, a new Note or Notes of the
series of which this ~ote is one, c~ authorized denominations
and sf the same aggregate principal amount, will be issued
the transferee in exchange herefer. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Registrar shall not be required to exchange or
transfer thi~ Note later tha~ tho close o~ business on the
(__) ~ay next preceding ~y date ~ixud ~or the
rede~ptie~ of this Note or an~ port,on hereof.
Th~ full faith and credit of the County are hereby
irrevesably pledged to the payment of the DrinoipaI of and
This ~Q%e shall nc~ be valid ox obligator~ unless
manually signed by an authorized signator of ~hs Re~ia~rar.
It ia hereby csrti~ie~, reei%e~ and ~eclare~ that
exist and to have been ~erformsd precedent to and in the
ecu ti~u, form and m~nner as req~ire~ by law, m~d that this
Note and the Notes of the series of which this Note is one do
not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of
indebtedness.
90-894
IN WITNESS WI~EREOF, the County~ by its Board of
Supervisors, has caused this Note to he executed by the manual
or facsimile signature of the Chairman e~ suuh Board; a
facsimile of the corporate seal ef much Beard to be imprinted
hereon, attested by the manual or facsimile signaLure of ~he
Clerk of such Board; and this Note to be dated aa of ,
I9__.
Clerk of the Board cf
Supervisors
This Note is one of =he Notes delivered pursuant to
the within-mentioned pr0cee~i~c.
], Registxar
~Y:
Authorized Signatcr
Date of Authentieatien~
For value received, the undersigaed hereby cell(s},
assign(s) and transfer(s) unto
[Please print or type r~a~e aBd address, including postal
zip code, of transferee)
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL ~ECURITY
OF TBANSFEP~EE~
]
)
the within Note and all rights thereunder, and hereby
irrevocably constitutes and al~Deints
attorn=y, to trans~=r such Note o~ the b0ok~ kept for
rcgi~tratio~ thereo~, with ~ull Rower o~ substitution in the
Dated:
$ignature(~) Suarantec4
NOTICE: Signature(c) must be
guaranteed by a member firm of
The New York Stock ~xchunge,
or a commercial ~ank e~
trust company.
(Signature(s) of Registered
Ownerl
NOTICe: The slgnatu~e($) IRe,
above mus~ correspond with the
name of the Regicterc~ Owner
as it appears on the front of
this ~ote in every particular0
without alteration e~ enlarge-
ment or any chang~ whatsoever.
90-895
(e) l~ is cen~e/~Dlate~ by the Board o~ Su~ervisoro
that this resolution ~hall be full and complete authority for
the issuance, sale and delivery of the Notes and that no
further action by the Boar~ of Supervlsors shall be required
in connection with such issuance, sale and delivery.
SECTION 11. Piling of ~nis Resolution. The County
Attorney is hereby authorized a~d directed to file a copy of
this resolution, certified by the Clerk of the Board of
Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfield.
SECTION 12. I~validit~ of Sections~ Paragraphs,
Clauses or Provisions. If any section, para~raph, clause oi
provision of this r~solution shall be held invalid or
fore,able for an~ reason, the invalidit~ or une~orcs~ili~y
of such section, paragraph, claus~ or provision sh~ll
affect any of the remaining portions o~ thio resolution.
SECTION 13. Headings o~ Sections. The headings
the seutions o~ this r~solution shall be ~olely for
constr=ctlon, interpretation or effect of such ~ecti~ns ~r
S~CTION 14. Effectiv~ Date. This r~solution shall
tak~ ~ff~c~ upon its a~Dtion.
Ayeo: Mr. Currin, Mr. sullivan, Mr. ADDlegate and ~r. Daniel.
to the School Board.
ll.G. EXECUTiVe.
On motion of Mr. Apple~=te, ~ocun~ed by ~r. ~ullivan, the
Board went into Executive Session pursuant to Section 2.1-344
(a)(7) of Ute code of ¥irginia, ~9~0, as amended, to consult
with counsel re~ardin~ legal issues involving the James River
On motion of F~r. Apptegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ham this day adjourned
into ~xeoutive S~mmio~ i~ aocordanc~ with a formal vote o~ the
Board, and in acsordanee with the provisions of the Vi=gi~ia
Freedc~ nf InfQrmation Act; and
WHZREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Info,atica Act
effective J~lY 1, 1989, provides for certifimaticm ~hat n~h
MOW, TH~EFO~, BE IT ~SOLV~ that the Board o~ County
Supmrvisors dOe~ h~reby certify that to the best of each
Infor~tion A~t were discussed in the Executive S~mmion to
which this certification a~lies, and ii) omly such p~lic
buminemm matters am ware id~ntifie~ in the Motionbywhich the
Executive Session was convened were heard, discussed or
9o-896 11/28/90
considered by the Board. No moulder dissents from this certi-
fication.
The Board being polled, the vote was as followsz
Mr. Mayes: Aye.
Mr. Daniel: Aye.
Mr. Applogate: Aye.
Mr. ~ullivan~ Aye.
Mr. Currin: Aye.
The Board recessed to travel to the
Chesterfield County Airport for
sunset cafe at the
90,~,~030~
la Bermuda Magisterial District, KI~B~Y PA~a~ requested .a
Mobile Moms permit to park a mobile home in a ~esidentLal
[R-7) District. The density of the proposal is approximately
property for m~dium density resid6ntial us~ of 1.51 to 4.00
units/acre. This probity fronts the northwest line of
Sri~htwood Avenue, a~roximately 200 fact south of Vet~ Road,
(2) Central Park~ Block 13, Lots 38 and 39.
~. Jacobsen presented a s~ary of case 90SN0303 a~d stated
accept~le. There was no opposition present.
On motion of ~. Currin, seconded by Mr. Appl~at~, the Board
approved Case 90SN0303 for seven [7} ~ars, subject to the
fcll~ing conditions:
1. ~ applicant nhall b~ the o~er and occupant of the
mobile home.
2. N~ lot or parcel ~y be rented or leased for use as
used for ret=al property. Only one ~1) mobile home
or parcel.
3.Tho min~ lot sir=, yard s~ucks, r~ir~d front
applicable zoning distric~ shall be co~lie~ with,
~xcep= that no mobile home shall be located closer
than 20 ~eet to any ~isting residence.
4. No additional p~rm~ent-t~e living space m=~ be
added onto a mobile home. Ail mobile homes shall ~
skirted but shall no~ be pla~ed on a De~anen%
foundation.
5. Wher~ p~lic (Co~tXl water and/or sewer are
avail~le, they shall ~ used.
UDon being qrant~d ~ Mobile Eome Pe~t, the
applicant shall then obt~ the necessary De~its
from the o~fiGe of the Building Official. ~is
90=897 11/28/90
shall be done prior to the installation er
relocation of the mobile home.
7. Any violation of the above conditions shall be
grounds for revocation of the Mobile ~ome Permit.
Vote: Unanimous
90~0255
In Matoaca Magisterial District, landmark de~ip~ation i~
requested ~or O. B. GATES RESIDENCE. Th~ Comprehensive Dian
designates the prspert~ for rosideatial use of 1.50 units per
acre or lesp. This request fronts approximately 198 feet on
the north line Of Beach Read, approximately 2,130 ~eet west of
Nash Road and is bet%er known az 8011 Gates Bluff ~laee. Tam
~ap 95-1~ (2) Gates Bluff, Lot 3 [Sheet 31).
~Lr. Jacobsen presented a summary of Cas~ 90H~Q255 and stated
tho Planning Commission an~ ~reserva=ion co~ie~ reco~n~e~
approval of Landmark Designation ~or O.B. Gates Residence,
based on the following oondition~:
1. This is a distlnpuished building of high historic
2. This designation will cause no ~i~nificant adverse effect
on the fu~ura development uf ~he County.
opposition present.
On motion of ~Lr. Mayo~r n~conded by NLr. ~ullivan, the Boar~
appuoved ~istorlc Landmark Desipnatlon ~cr Case 90~0255, ~
house and lend sho~ on Y~ Kap 95-10 {2) Gates Bluff, Lot 3.
Vote= Unanimous
90SN0254
In ~a~ua~a Magisterial D~tr~ct, HOP PAR~TF~ requested
rezoning from Agricultural {A) to Residential
Residential use of up to 3,63 units per ~cre is permitted in a
Residential (R-12) District. ~e Comprehensive ?lan
designates the property for residential use of t.51 to 4.00
uni=s per acre. This request lies on a 7.8 acre parcel
f~ontin~ =pproximatel~ 307 feet on the northwest
~arobrith Drive, appx0ximately 1,31~ ~eet southwest o~
~ill Road. Tax Map 149-6 (I) Parcel t (Sheet 41).
Mr. Jacobsen presented a su~ar~ o~ Case 90SN025~ and stated
the appli~t'~ proffered co~i%ionn. ~e noted this can~
deferred at the October 24, 1990 meetin~ to allow further
discussion regarding provisions of p~lic water ~d ~ewer.
condition had been distributed at th~ on,et of the ~tin~ and
that he had not had sufficient time to review the co~iti~n.
~. Currin stated, since there was concern regardin~ the case~
90-89~ 11/28/90
In Nidlothian Maqi~terial District,
requested rezo~ing from Agrioultural (A) to Residential
(R-25). Residential ~se of up to 1.74 units per acre is
permitted in a Residential (R-25) Distriet~ The density of
such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or
ordinance standards. The Co~prehenB£ve Plan designates the
This request lies on a ~8.6 acre parcel l¥in~ approxLmatel¥
220 feet off the west line of South Netherfield Drive~
measured at a point approximately 300 feet north o~ its
southern terminus. Tax Nap 6 (1) Parcel 16~ Ta~ Map 7-1 {1]
Parcel 3; and Tax Map 7-5 (1) ~arcel %2 (Sheets i and 2).
Mr. Jacobsen presented a summary o~ Case Se~N034~ and stated
the Planning Oommiesion recommended approval and acceptance of
the applicant's proffered
~r. E~ward Willey, Jr+ sta~d th~ applicant desires a deferral
of this recf~est to the January 23, 1991 meeting.
O~ ~otion o~ Mr. Sullivan~ seconded by Mr. Applegate, the
Boa~d d~f~rred Cas~ $95N034g until January 23, 1991,
Ms. Garnette Hammerman, an adjacent property owner, stated she
did not object to the deferral; however, the residents did
wish Ohm ~oard =u be aware that one of ~he proffered
condition~ reflects ~hat Mr, Will~y will assist the residents
in proceeding with oompletion of an epplication for the
~acation of the stub road at the e~d .of Netherfiel~ Drive.
90SN0273
In Bernluda ~agisteri~l District, JO~N ~. ~ requested
rezoniag from Ce~nity ~usiness (C-~) tn ~eavy Industrial
(I-3]. The density of such a~endment will be c~ntrolled ~
zonln~ =onditiuns or Ordinates st~dards, The Comprehensive
~lan desi~tes the property ~or co~rcial u~e with density
the west line of Jefferson Davis Highway and the north line o~
Ch~ter Road~ and is lo~atsd in the northwest ~adr~t of ~e
intersection of these roads. T~ ~ap 81-4 (1) Part o~ Parcel
77 (Sheet 23).
~. Jacobsen pre~enUed a s~ary of Case 90~273 and ~ta~ed
the Pla~ing Oo~ission teen, ended approval and acceptance of
th~ applicant's proffered conditions.
approv~ Ga~ 9OSCO273 and accepted the ~oll~ing proffered
(I-3) shall be li~tsd to those use~ ~e~itted in the
Light Industrial (I-l) District and the ~olluwing use
from the Hea~ Industrial (I-3) District:
manu~a=~uring.
2. Prior to th~ issuance of a buildin~ permit, ~ixty (60)
feet of zieht of waF on th~ west sid~ oi Route 1/30! ~d
thirty-five (35) feet of right of way on the north side
of chests~ Road, Both measured from tbs ~en~erline of
that part of the roads immediately ad~ace~t to the
preperty~ shall be dedicated, free and ~nr~stricted, to
and for the benefit of Chesterfield County.
Vo~: Unanir~ous
9~,.~,~0280
In Clover Eill ~4agisterial District, II~/C~NSPRIN~S
requested amendment to Conditional us~ Pla~ed Development
(Case ~SO08} relative to the r~storation and pre~a~ion
a historic structure (Ellett-~cock HORSe) in a Residential
(R-9) District. The density of such ~en~ent will
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinate standards.
Comprehensive ~la~ designates the propert~ for
agricultural/fore,tel uses wi~h density to be de~e~in~d by
developmsnt re~la~i~ns. Thi~ request lies on a 2.0 acre
parcel fronting approximately 150 ~eet on the north lin~
Tax N~p 47 (1) Part of Parcel 10 (Shee~
~r, Saco~son present~ a s~ary of Case 90SN0280 a~d ~tated
~he Pla~ing Cotillion reco~en~ed approval, $~ject
certain conditions.
r~co~ended condibio~ wer~ accept~la. ~ere was no
Board approved C~se 9OSN02~0, ~ect to the following
conditions:
1. Tho applicant shall m~e avail~le any salvageable
material~ from the existing Ell~tt-Hancock House and
appurten~t ~tructures ~or reuse in renovation
~estoration projects. Such materials shall include, but
~hall not be limited to, mantles, interior trim and
moldiag, flooring, buil~ng, structural supports, bricks,
etc.
2, ~e applicant shall make avail~le to the Chesterfield
coun=~ ~istorical Society for a period of on9 (1) year,
ef~c~i~ as of the dat~ of approval of th~ re.est, one
(1) acre of the re~e~t ~i~e on whioh archaeological
surveys can be conducted for the purpose of retrieving
historioat artifacts. The appli=ant ~hall contact the
feasibility of such surveys inoludin~ the exac~
location(s} ~y excavations on the sit~ and shall advise
th~ Director o~ Plannin~ of such dete~ination ~ithin
ninety (~0) ~a~s of ~he a~roval of this re,est.
Further, the applicant shall make provisions ~or the
dete~in~d by the Chesterfield ~istorical Society.
90~0283
In Bermuda Magisterial District, IF/R~INIA ~.~CT1AIC AND POWE~
COMPANY requssted rezening fro~ Heavy Industrial (~-3~ to
~e~vy Industriul (I-31, plu~ C~nditional U~e to per. it
expansion of an electric power generation plant. Tbs density
o~ such amendment will be controlled by ~oning co~dition~ or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan dssignates the
propor~y for general industr? use with d~nsity tu be
determined b~ development regulations. This reques= lies on a
90-900 lt/28/90
19.5 aero parcel fronting approximately 210 feet on the
northeast line sf Csxsndale Road, approximately 100 feet north
33).
Mr. Jacchson presented a summary of Case 90SN0283 and stated
the applicant's proffered conditions.
There was opposition present regarding tlle proposed requests.
Mr. currin stated, since there wam opposition presentr the
In B~rmuda Magieterial Dist:ic~, ~. ~ORG~ KIP~¥
rescning from A~zic~ltu~al (A) to Residential (R~12).
Residential use of uD fo 3.63 u/~its per acre is permitted in a
~esidential (R-12) District. The density of such ~end~ent
will be controlled b~ zoning conditions or Ordinance
residential use of 1.51 - 4.00 uni=s per acre with density to
be dete~ined by develo~t repletions. Thi~ re,est li~
on a 1.86 acre parcel fronting approximately 170 feet on the
of Neadowdale Boulevard. T~ ~ap 53-14 (1) Part of Parcel 1
(Sheet 16).
th~ a~lican=~s pro~re~
Mr. Fra~ Potts, representing the a~lican~ stated
reoo~endation was eccentric. There was no opposition
~. currin suggested tha~ , after reviewing th~ section of
~a!ysis entitled" Impact on Capital Fa~ilit~en", he felt the
Board may wish to review their policy concerning cash proffers
at a la=er date.
Oa motion of ~. Currin, seconded by Nr. Daniel, the Board
approved Case 90SNO2O2 and accepted the ~ollowing pro~ered
conditions:
~ollowing t~ the COUnty of chesterfield at t~e t~e
building permit application or within two years of final
record plat approval; whichever shall occur first, for
infrastructure imprcv~unts within =ho sunice district
a. $2,Q00.00 per lo=, ii paid prior ~o July 1, 1991;
to exseed $3,000.00 p~r lot, if paid between July 1,
1991 and dune 30, 1992, incisive: o=
o. ~e ~ount approved ~ the Board of sup~isors not
to exceed $4,S~8.00 par lot, if paid ~tween duly 1,
1992 and Jun~ 3~, 1993, incisive, or
d. The ~ount approved by the Board o~ Supervisors not
increase in the Marshall and Swift B~l~i~g Cost
I~dex between July ~, 1992 and July i o! the fiscal
year in whisk the pa~ent is made if paid a~t=r
30, 1993.
90-901 11/28/90
2. Prior to final subdivision plat approval, the applicant,
the subdivider or assignee(s) shall furnish to the Board
of Supervisors a surety bond, approved by the ceunty
Attorney, sufficient to cover the sost et such pa!rmeats.
3. The applicant stipulates and agrees that the ~eed for
this proffer for infrastructure improvements i= generated
solely b~ this rezoning.
4. ~ior to %he issuance of a building paImit, thirty-five
(35) feet of right of way, measured from the existing
centerline of South Beulah Read immediately adjacent tu
the property shall be dedicated f~ and u/~res~rieted to
and' for the benefit of Chesterfield County.
Vote= Unanimous
~0S~0294
In ~atoaoa ~agisterial Di~tri~, A~O~ATTOX l~IV~ WATER
A]]~OI~_TTY requested C~nditional Use t~ ~it a water
trea~en~ plant in an Agri~ult~al (A) D~trict. ~e density
of ~uch ~n~ent will be controlled by zoning conditions
for parks, ~ecreation, open space and P~lic/~i-p~lio use
with density to be determined by development re~lation$.
This re~=st lies on two (2} parcels totalling a~ro~ately
116.~ acrez fronting approximately 650 ~t on the south line
also fronting aDD,ex,abelY 1,6~0 ~eet on the we~t line of
Chesdin Road, approximately 25S feet south of River ROad, and
approx~ately 1,700 fe~t on ~he =asr line of Ck~sdln
approx~at~ly 1,680 ~eet south of River ~o~d. T~ Map 185-3
the Planning Co~ission race,ended approval, s~ject to
o~rtain
~z. Richard H~an, reDresentlng the applicant, s~aze~ the
acceptable. When asked, several individuals indicate~
opposition tothe proposed r~es~. ~. currin stated,
there Was opposition, the case would be h~ard in its reeler
s~nce un the age~du.
90~1~10254
In Matilda ~agisteria~ District, ~O~ PAR~ req~te~
rez~ning from Agricultural (A) ~o Residential (R-12).
Residential USc cf up to 3.63 unlt~ per acre is permitted in a
~esidential (R-i~) District. The Comprehensive Plan
designates the DreDert~ for r~=identlal use of 1.5~ to 4.00
unit~ per acre. Thi~ request lies on a 7.8 acre parcel
fronting approximately 507 feet on the northwest line of
Marobrith Drive, approximately 1,916 fee~ southwest o~ Hap~
Mill Road. Tax ~ap 149-6 ~1) Parcel 1 (Shunt 41).
Nr. Jacobsen b~iefly s~ar]zed the proposed r~est and
~tated the Planning Co~i~sion reco~nded app~ovaI and
acceptance of the applicant's pro,fared condlu~o~$.
Mt. J~e~ ~arrison, r~resen~ing the applicant, sCa=ed the
Mr. George ~eadles e~ressud cono~rn regarding the ~ttal
of pro,fared conditions lust prior to the meeting or at the
time a case is scheduled to be presented to the Boar~ and ~at
11/25/90
he felt that the District Supervisor should be notified of
e~tabl±~hed with criteria that proffers be submitted within a
certain number of days prior to the scheduled meeting. Mr.
equitable resolution to said problem. Xr. Harrison briefly
explaiae~ ~e reason his e~hmitted proffer was provided at
suc~ s~ort notice. Mr. Mayes stated he did net ascent the
the proffer and questioned whether or not the applicant could
make such proffers thst would impact another property owner.
~vent~ ~o long a~ it affected the s%Lbjeet property, When
asked, ~ir. Harrison indicated it is the applicant's intention
te utilize public water and sewer when the property is
developed. ~e ~urther e~Plai~ed that tho existing single
family structure currently located on the site would remain on
a well and septic systeJ~ until such time as pL%blic utilities
were provided to any n~w homes to be considered on the site.
Mr. Mayes ex, reseed concern that
unc~rtaintie~ r~garding this case and
amended proffer provided to him just
discuseS,
there were too many
he could not consider an
prior to the case being
After further discussion, Mr. ~ayes ma~e a motion to defer
case 90sN0~54 until January 23, 1990 sc that he could have the
opportunity to review the amended proffer in conjunction with
the ori~inal request. ~e ~urthcr stated he ~elt the Board
minute.
Mr. D~niel s~ated he felt there should be a ~ore definitive
submitted to meet the Board agenda but felt such issue should
be discussed separately from thin particular zoning case.
Mr- Daniel seconded the motion for discussion.
Further discussion ensued relative to the proposed use ~or the
request; the applicant's pref£ered conditions indicating
intent to %tilize p~blic water and sewer; the use of all
~app~ Hill Road or other transportation improvements versus
other infrastructure needs £er ~ot only this case but also
future oases; etc. Mr. Stegmaier briefly explained the
current policy in the use of cash proffers and indicated staff
is in the process ~f determi~in~ a percentage usage ~f funds
toward certain categories. Mr. Daniel indicated he had
categories for the purpose designated and if that were not the
case, h~ would like st~f£ to draft a paper clearly outlining
the polioy and provide same to the Board in the future
outlining infrastructure needs, ~uadlng ~ommi~meats, etc., as
they related to the use cf cash proffers. Mr. Currin directed
tha~ staff bring back cash proffers and their funding
¢=tago~ie~ for discussion at the next
There was ~rief discussion relative to whether or not the
foot right-of-way ~ro~ere~ along ~rcbrith Road is adequate
for improvements along same. Mr. McCracken stated that said
proffer would not addres~ all of the Lm~aet cf this particular
zoning.
Mr. Mayos called the question on the deferral.
Ayes= Mr.
NeWs: Mr. Cnrrin, Mr, Sullivan and Mr. Applegate.
Abstention: Mr. Daniel.
Mr. Daniel stated he would like to defer this ca~e U/ifil after
Case 89SN~345, JAMES D. CARTER, had heen presented so that the
90-903
Board could compare the ramifications and parallels of both as
he is not from the District and not familiar with the details.
Mr. Jaccbson stated Nr. Carter's attorney had indicated to him
that he intended to recluest a deferral of his case. Mr.
Daniel stated he felt both cases should be treated e~uitably.
Mx. Harrison stated his client's case had been previously
deferred, the applicant had made every effort to comply with
requests of staff, and he did not feel this request should be
After £urther discussion, Mr. Sullivan made a motion, seconded
following proffered conditions:
i. Should the rezoning re,est be qranted, the applicant,
subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the
County o~ Chesterfield at the time of building permit
approval~ whichever shall occur first, for
improvements within the servlee district for the
a.- $2,000.00 per lot, if paid prior to July 1, 199~ Or
b. The amount approved by the Board of Supervisors not
to exceed $3,000.00 per lot, if paid between July 1,
1991 and June 30, 1992, inolusive; or
c. The amount approved by the Board of Supervisor~ not
to exceed $4,000.00 per lot, if paid between July
1992 and June ~0, 1993, inclusive, or
The amount approved by the Board of Supervieor~ not
to ~×o~ed $4,000.00 per lot adjusted upward by any
increase in the ~arshai1 a/~d Swift Building Cost
Index between July 1, 1992 and July 1 of the fiscal
year in which the payment is made i~ paid a~ter June
30, 1993.
Before final subdivision ~lat approval, the subdivider
shall furnish to th~ Board of Supervisors ~ s~rety bo~d,
approved by the County Attorney, sufficient to cover the
cost of such payments.
2. The applicant, mubdivid~r or ammignm~(~) s~all
free and unrestricted to and ~or Chemterfietd County
twenty-~ive f~t right-of-way measured from the
centerline of Marobrith Drive.
A~y addikienal ~esidential lots created as the result of
the approval ~f this ~equest, other than ~he sin~le
far~il~ residence currently lo~ated on the
property, shall use %he public water an~ wastewater
systems. In the ~vent that the other additional
residential lots, created as the result o~ the approval
of this request~ ar~ developed and the publi= water
wastewater systems are e~tended to serve those other
lo~$, then =h~ applicant, subdivider or assignee{s) shall
connect the existin~ single family residence to the
pu~li= water and wastewater
AyeS: Kr. CUXriu, Mr. sullivan, ~r. Applsgate and Mr. Daniel.
Nays: Er. Mayes.
90-9U4 11/28/90
90~I~253
CfX~ANY rs~zes=ed rezoning from ~a~ Industrial (~-3) to
~ea~ Industrial (I-3), plus Conditional Use to pe~it expan-
sion ~ an ~lectric ~uwer generation plan~. Th~ ~gn$ity o~
~uch ~n~e~% will be controlled b~ zoning conditions or
Ordinanoe standar~. The Comprehensive Plan desi~ates th~
property for general industry use with density to be
determined by development r~ta~ion~. This re.est lies on a
19.5 acre parcel fron~ing ~pproximately ~10 ~et on the
northeast lin= of Coxen~ale Road~ approximately 100 ~t north
33).
Mr. Jacobsen ~ummarized Case 90SN0283 and stated the Planning
Cor~ission recommendsd approval a~d acceptancs of the
applicant's proffered condition.
Mr. Alle~ Todd, repre~snting the r~qusst, stated the
recommendation is acoeptabls.
Mr. George Beadles voiced opposition to the proposed request
aa he £elt a condition should Be impo$gd to prevent outdoor
advertising on the s~ject site.
On motion of Mr. Cu~rin, zeconded b~ Nr. Applegate, the Beard
~o~ition:
Prior to sits plan approval, thirty-five
(35) feet o~ riiht-e~-way On the ~orth
aide o~ Coxendale Road, measured from the
eenterline of that par= of Co~ondale Road
immediatel~ adjacent to the property,
shall be d~ioatsd, fren and unres%ric~sd,
to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County.
90SN0294
In Matosca Magistsrial District, APP(~6ATT0~ ~_IVE~ Wkr~K
AFI~ORITY rsgucs~ed Co~di~ionaI Use to De.it a wats/ treat-
ment pl~t in an Agricultural (A) District. Tho density o~
suc~ ~n~en~ will be con~rolle~ by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. Th~ Cumpx~e~iv~ Plan de~ignate~ the
property for residential use of 1.5 u~its ~er sore or l~s and
for parks, recreation, op~B ~p~ce an~ p~lic/s~-p~lic usa
with density to be determine~ b~ development re~lations.
116.33 acres fronting approx~atel~ 650 ~eet on the south line
of River Road, agpruxima~ely 230 feet west of Chesdin Road,
also fronting approxi~tely 1,650 feet on the we~t tine of
~pproximatel~ 1,700 feet on the east line of Chesdin Road,
(1) ~arcel 4 and Part ~ Parcel 7 (Sheet 52).
~r. Jacobsen presen%ed a s~ary of Case 90~N0294 ~ stated
the Planning C~ission r~co~end~d aD~roval, s~j~c= ~o
certain conditions.
Mz. Richard Hartman, representing the applicant, stated the
reco~ended conditions were accept~le.
~. Georg= Buudl=s voic~ opposition to t~e proposed re.est
and ~mi~%ed infc~tion %o th~ Bo~d outli~ng his concerns,
copies o~ which are filed wit~ the papers of this Beard. He
90-905 11/28/90
stated he would like to see the Appomattox River Water
Authority required to rep0rt annually to the Csunty regarding
problem~ in th~ watershed and suggested solutions for sue.
Ms. Carol~ Powers, representing CCE, expressed concerns
regarding the p~opesed r~c~2est ~nd stated she would like to
see the request deferred in order to give ~he applicant an
opportunity to proffer a condition to provide a water quality
study reviewing the ApRsmatt~ River Water area and any
potential problems that may arise.
provides copies of its annual report us the County; and
suggested that i~ a study were de~ired, it would
appropriate to ask that Mr. R~s~y bring said matter to the
attention of the ADpo~t%ox River Wa~er
MI. ~es ataUud he had had call~ from one of his co~tituents
regarding mos~ito-like pe~%= in this area a~d in,ired if
they were related to the operation of the ~WA facility.
done to reduce the nuiaance to Mr. Mayer' constituent.
On m~tion ~ Mr. ~aye~, ~eonded by Mr. Apptegate, t~e Boar~
~pDroved Cas~ 90SN~294, s~ject to the ~ollowing conditions=
I. W~th th~ e~ception of the 200 foot se~ack ~e~i~ent
re~irem~ntu of tho Zoning Ordinance for General
Industrial (I-2) Diatrictz in ~er~in~ Growth
areas. Sludge lagoons and facilities ~uch as driveways
to serve the lagoons may be located w~thin r~ired
ae~ack~ and buffers.
shall ~ accomplimhed~ Such landscaping shall consist
greater than thirty (30) fee= and a min~ catipez of
three and Ohm-half (3 1/2) laches at ~he t~e Qf
landscaping shall be approved by the Planning Debarment
at the b~e of site plan review.
3- Seventy-five (75) foot buffers shall be provided around
adjacent to th~ existing water freedent plant property
(T~ ~a~ 185-7 (t) Paroel 1). Except as stated herein,
these buffers ahall comply w~th %h~ re~ir~ of the
Zoning Ordinance, Article 4, Division 3. Sludge lagoon~
and utilitie~ shall b~ p~itted within the buffa=~, If
utili=ies are located in the buffe~, tho exact plac~ant
$hall be approve~ by the Plying Debuteen= and the
placement shall be such that the effectiveness of the
buffer is maintained.
4. At such time the= reoonmtru~tion of chesdin Road is
co~itted, fiv~ (5) f~t o~ right of way, meas~ed from
the sd~ of th8 8ighty (80~ foot wide righ= of way from
and ~ediately adjacent to the property identified
T~ Map 185-7 (1) Parcel 1 shall be dedicated, fr== and
unrestricted, to and ~or th~ b~n~Eit of Cheste=field
County. (T)
5. At such t~8 that reoonstruction of River Read
co~ittu~, ~or%y-five (45) feet o~ righ~ of way on the
south si~e o~ River Road, me~ure~ fr~ the centerline
that part o~ River Road i~e~ately adjao~t %o
90-906 11/2~/9Q
property, ahall be dedicated, free and unrestrleted, to
and for the benefit uf Chesterfield County. (T)
Vote: Unanimous
~r. Sullivan asked that ~r. Ramsey previde the Beard wi~h
copies of the annual report as referenced by ~%r. Hart~an;
state~ he felt valid concerns had been raised; and asked that~
through the a~mlaimtrative process, MI. R~msey take up the
discussed matters with the Authority.
in Natoaca Maglstexial Dintrlct, J~F.~ D. ~ requested
rezoning from Aqrieultural (A) to Residential (H-11).
Residential develoRmun~ of ~p to 3.62 units per acre is
permitted in a Residential (R-12) District. The Comprehensive
Plan designat~ the Rropert~ for r~i~ial ~e~lopment of
1.51 to 4.0 unite per acre. ~his req%lest lies on a 29.0 acre
parcel located at the western terminus of Marobrith Road.
Map 149-5 (i) Parcel 6 (Sheet
Mr. Ja¢obeon pre~ented a ~ua~ary of case 89SN0345 a/%d stated
the Pla~ing c~isuiun rec~ended approval and acce~t~ce o~
th~ proffur~ co~ition. He noted the request had been
deferred from th~ Septe~er 26, 1990 Board meeting in
for %h~ applicant, utai~ ~4 ~e~ers u~ the Bo~d' to meet with
adjacent, ooncor~d citizen~. H~ stated additional proffezu
were di~cu~sm~ at that m~tlng~ h~ever, to date, staf~ has
not reccived any additional proffer~ from thm applicant.
r~ze~ced petitions, OO~ining 37 signatures, fr~ citizens
Oppossd tO the re,est ~d a letter of concern regarding the
upgrading of ~=robrith Road.
~esires a deferral to the January 23, 1990 meeting in order to
meet with resident~ of HaRpy Hill Fa~s.
ease had been deferred several t~es; that the residents
~appy Mill Farms op~se the. proposed re,est wi~ut
addi~io~l pro~ers; ~d ~tated she felt it ~ece~a=~ and
inconve~ent to the ad]ac~nt property o~er~ to
along th=~ =ca4 in Drd~r to dete~ine his right-of-wa~
~eferral woul~ provide him that opp~rt~ity and ~e was
~an~le to that
~I+ S~llivan stated that other applications roi razoning in
this area ha4 ~mitted cash proffers to
=heiI develo~ment~; ~ha~ this applicant had not proifered
~a; hu did not feel the t~ayers of %~ CO~y ~houtd
~he ~urde~ of this e~ense tha~ would be generated by this
proposed d~velopmunt; and that the re,es% should be denied.
There was further discussion rulativ~ to continued deferral of
the re~est~ ingress a~ agrees; the overall impact of the
s~jeet r~est on the r~xidential co~it~; etc.
unidentified citizen indi~ata~ him opposition ~o f~r~her
90-907 11/28/90
~. Mayes ~a~e a motion to defer Case BPSN0345 %~til January
23, 1990. There was no second.
~r. Sullivan made a mo%ion, ~eeonded 5y Mr. Daniel, to deny
Case 89SN034~.
kyes~ Mr. Currin, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Daaiel.
Abstenti~n~ ~r. Mayer.
It was generally agreed ts recess for five (5) minutes.
89SN0~44 (Amende~)
In ~ale Magisterial ~i~trict, VE/~ON E. LA, RAPE, JR.
rezening fr~ Agricul%=ral (A] to Residential (~-9) u~ 130.95
acres and Co~ity Business [C-3) of 14.28 aor~s
Condltlonal U~e to pe~it an outdoor r~r~ational facility.
ReSidential development o~ up to 4.84 units per acre
permi~e~ in a Re~iduntial (R-9) District. ~= density of th=
proposed ~e~ent for %he C-3 area will be controllud by
z~ning cundi~ion~ ur Or~naa~e atan~rd=. Th~ CumDrehenzive
Plan designates the property for public/s~i-p~lic ~ses with
d~nslty to be controlled by development repletion= and
lie~ on a 145.24 acre parcel ~ron=inq aDDrOx~ately 1,675 feet
on th~ north line o~ Cogbill Roa~, alzo fronting
3,725 feet on the ~a~ lin~ of Be~0nt Road, and located
~he nor~huast ~adr~t o~ the intersection of thes~ roa~s.
T~ Map S5-1 (1) Parcel i0; Tax ~ap 65-2 (1) Parcel 1 and; T~
Map 65-9 (1) Parcel 2 (Sheet 22).
M~. Peele preaenU~d a s~ary of Case 89SN0344 and stated the
Planning Co~i~zio~ ~co~ended de,al based on
regarding th~ intensity of the co~eroial develo~ent
for the site, compatibility Of residpntial dpv~lopment with
existin~ residential d~velo~nt ~d road/tr~sportation
impr0veme~ts. He noted the applicant had s~i~ted
conditions just prior t0 the meeting; h~ever, staf~ had not
had th~ ~pportunity to review/discuss said proffers in
conjunotion with this application.
~. Vernon L~rade stated he u~d his unginuur had met several
~ta~tial improv~nts to Be~ont Read ~d el~inaticn
Mr. Currin disclosed to the Bo~d that he ~erVes on a bank
COnflict of interest with respect to this re~emk. ~.
indicated that ~. Currin did not have ~ c~n~llc= of in=erest
regarding thi~ case as he had no financial interest in this
DiscusSiOn, questions and cements ensued relative to
/esidun~ial areas; use of p~lic water ~d ~ew~r facilities;
~ended proffers and had not had ~ opport~ity tu ade~ately
review them an~ state~ he wished t0 h~ar p~li= co~ents prior
9o-9os zz/zs/~
end addressed concerns regasdin~ the intensity of the proposed
the compatibilit~ of residential development and ~roximity of
the site to the county Airport. ~s. ~andt ~u~mit~a~ copie~
adjacent residential community lot sizes; etc., and indiGated
proffer~ had been submi::ed without their havinq
opport~ity =o r~view th~m. (Copies of the data s~itted is
approximately twe~ty-fi~ve individuals sto~ to indicat~ their
applicant was attempting zo obtain a deferral of his
Robinw~ud S~ivision also indicated opposition to
Mr. La~rade stated he had made every effort to comply
with/resolve con¢ern~ of ~taff ~ar~a residents.
of all those involved; that based on the infection provided,
he could not support the C-3 color,iai development
outlined in the Re~e~t ~alysis; that hu was nut prepared
neither he, other Board m~rs nor staff ~d had an
opport~ity to r~vlew and/cz c~mnt on thmm.
~pplicatioB ~ I~a~d th~ re~ast to th~ Planing co~ission
merit, s~ject to the pzo~fered con. fiche s~mitted thi~
date, with a full review of s~e by staff a~ the Plying
Supervisors.
co~rcial portion of the application but in.ired as to the
portion in his re~est ~d rezon~ the ~ntire parcel
residential develo~en~. Mr. Pool~ indicated if Lhe
were remanded to the Pla~ing Co.lesion for f~ther study,
After ~urther discussion/ciarification, Mr. De.el
Co~ission ior ~u~ther review/~on$i~rmtion, with
only residential develo~ent be considered, that said
residential davelo~ent ~e compatible wit~ existing area
r~side~ial development, ~d that the zoning be s~ject to the
proffered Conditions s~tted this date. Mr. Applegate
Ms. Brandt s~itted a co~ of a~ aviation aureeme~t ~ the
without areas residents knowledge; ~d asked that some t~e
Mr. Sullivan exprea~ed concern regardinq the m~er in which
the re.est had ~een handled; state~ he ~elt th~ rs~est
should be considered as s~mitted; expresa~ concern that
th~r~ w~re no cash proffers to address p~lic facilities
9~-909 11/28/90
denied so that the applicant could resubmit it in a more
a~p~opriat~ form. ~lr. Mayas concurred.
Mr. Sullivan made a s~bst~tute motion to ~en¥ Case ~9~0344.
There wa~ no second. The motion failed for lack of a second.
Mr- Daniel stated he felt the review process has not been
adequately applied regarding this ease; that the applicant
should not be be singled out to provide proffered conditionsr
partioul&rl¥ since his request was submitted prior ~o The
establishment of a Doliey for accaptanee of cash proffers;
that he ~elt the request should either ~o deferred or remanded
to the Planning Commission for further review~ and that he felt
his mo~ion legally appropriate.
The question was called sa ~z. Daaiel'~ marion.
Ayes: Mr. Ceftin, ~ffr. Applegate and l~r. Daniel.
Nays: Mr. Sullivan ~nd Fir. Mayas.
90~0235
In Clover Hill ~aqiaterial District, ~D, I~. ~ J~
H~ requested Coa~tional Use to pe~it indcoz/outdooz
recreational uses and associated comerclaI us~s in an
ztan~ard~. ~ Comprehensive Pl~ d~i~at~ th~ property for
offic% sE la,ge scale mixed use development with density to be
determined ~ dev~io~nt ~e~lations. ~is re~ezt lies on
33.9 a~re parcel fronting approxi~tely 950 ~eet o~ the north
line o~ Wa~ley Boulevard, also fronting approx~ately 1,142
feet on the south line si Hull Strmm~ Road. T~ ~p 39-12 (1)
Part of P~rcel 11 (Sheet 14).
Mr. Peele presented a a~y of Case 90SN0235 and stated the
Planning Co~ission race--ended d~nial based on the inte~ity
development would generate along ~ute 360.
Mr. Pat Cart~i~ht presented an ove~iew of the proposed
Drojeo~ a~ presented slides depictin~ the overall appearance
o~ the proposed r~reational
MI. Alan Barnes, Mr. Bill walto~ a~d ~r. L~ Hovi$
were in favoz of th~ project as it would provide entertai~ent
as well as emplo~ent for ~h~ youth u~ =h~ county, generat~
zevenuem for th~ t~ baas in the County, and that they would
t~e dav~loDm~nt on the pro~rty. ~. Bar,es stat~ he had
loiteri~g~ which copies he s~it=~d to the Board ~d
fll~d with the papers o~ this Board. Mr. Miens indicated said
were not s~itted hy the applicant h~sel~ ~d prior ~o the
meeting. In addition, copies of a p~titlon f~om residents in
favor of the propomed development were s~itted to be ~iled
with the papers of the Board. ~en asked, aDprox~ately
project.
~. Mr. Alan Keye~, Mr. Doug Pratt, Mr. Douq Scritoli ~d Hr.
Bob Va~orn voiced opposition t~ th~ pro~d ~vP~opment
they f~lt the proposed use too intens~ and inappropriate for
th~ s~je~t property; that it lacked compatibility wi~k the
existing neig~orhoods a~d would ~ located within too close
proximity of an exinting school ~a=ility; that it did
provide suit~te tr~sltlon in the area; e~res~d concerns
regarding n¢ise poilu=ion, increased ~za~ic conge~tion,
9~-910 11/28/90
i
truancy, parking, liphhin~, and that i% represented an
intrusion into a stable, single family residential area. when
ask~, approximately sixty (60) persons stood in opposition to
the ret/vest.
There was brief discussion regarding ~he properties in this
request; etc.
Mr. Currin brought the matter back befo~ the Boa~d for
discussion/comment. F~. ~ubbard inquired if the applicant
~ould submit petitions from Surreywood residents in favor of
the proposed project and have an opportunity for rebuttal of
=he cppesi~ion'~ re~arks. Mr. Currln ~tat~d th~ matter was
felt ~he proposed ~evelepment would be appropriate ~or and
~eneficial to th~ County; however, he felt M2r. McLaren, the
County Economic Devel0~ent Director, would have been very
help~Ul in locating an acceptaDle site ~or this project ~ad he
been contacted; that hase~ on the information provide~, he
submitted.
Mr. Sullivan stated he had dlscusse~ ~he me,its of this
he felt :he project would bm ideal for the Couaty as well,
hoWeVer, he also felt the subject location inappropriate and
Mr. currin briefly discussed topography of the subject
property, whether er not a feasibility study had been per~
formed by the appllea~, the intensit~ of the
etc. H~ stated he felt the project was viable but not in this
referenced the supreme court ruling regarding an individual's
residents affected by preposed development skould have a voice
in the zoning.
felt the proposed development would be an asset to the County;
however, the subject location was inappropriate for such a
On motion o~ Mr. Applegate, seo0nde~ b~ ~=. Daniel, ~he Board
~enied Case
Vote: Una~imou~
ll.J. JOINT I~EETING WITH LEGISLATIVE DenRGATIfH4 TO DIS~JS$
1991
MX. ~icas and Mrs. De~art presented each program item and
discussion ensued as to the type action to be taken on each
Proposed 1991 Legislative Program is filed with the papers of
this Board.)
There was discussion, questions and comments reparding whether
or not to proceed with the establishment of Transportation
Districts: elimination ~ the item to request an increased
90-911 11/28/90
speed limit on Kouzs ~88; consideration s~ a Charter
modilication to have the School Board members serve at the
pleasure of the Beard as opposed to ~our year terms;
legislation to allow an ad4itionaI 1/2 cent of sales tax Go be
returned to localitias based on school age population versus
point of sale; verbiage to provide for a constitutional
amendment which would relieve local government of stats
legislative and administrative mandates where a locality san
d~mo~strata no deg~ad&tien in service by ~liminatinq the
r0andates; etc.
Mr. Applegate stated it would be bsneffieial te the Board if
co~ie~ of l~gislatiun that directly impacts the County could
be provided to the Board.
Mr. Currin s%ated tha~ ~hose items, with the exception of
the Board of Supervisors as the Legislative Program to be
presented to the General Assembly for 1991.
12.
Cn motion of Mr. kpplegate, seconded by lVI.~. Mayes, the Board
adjourned at 7:00 p.m. (EST) until 9:00 a.m. (ESTt on Deoeafoer
12, 1990.
County Administrator~
C~ F. Cu~rin, Jr.
Chairman
11/28/90