Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
12-12-90 Minutes
DBCI~4B]~ 12~ 1~0 Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. ¢. F. Currin, Jr., Chairman Mr. ~. B. Sullivan, Vice chairman Mr. G. H. Applega:e Mr. Harry G. Daniel Mr. Lane B. Ramsey County Adminisfra%or Ms. A~y P&vis, ~xec. Asst. to Co. Admin. Asst. Co. Admin., Legis. OYes. and Intergovern. Affairs Clerk to ~he Boar~ Fire Department Mr. Bradford S. E~er, Dir., Gen. Servi~s Mr. Ron Cite=it CQUZt Cl~rk MS, ~ry LOU Lyle, Dir., Accounting Dept. De~y Co. A~in., Mr. R. J. Dir., Env. ~ng. Dept~ Mr. St~ve L. Micas, Attorney ~rs. Pauline Mitohell~ ~ir. of News & Public In~o. Services Dr. Willi~ Nelson, Dir., Healt~ Dept. Col. J. E. ~i%~an, Chief of Police ~z. Willi~ D. Poole, Chief, Dev. Review, Planning DeBarment ~r. Richard Dir. of Budget & Mr. M. D. Stlth, Dir. o~ Parks & Res. Mr. David w~lohon~, Dir. c~ Utilities Mr. Currin called the regularl~ scheduled meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. (EST]. 1. I~VOCATION Mr. Currin introduced Dr. Ja~e~ ~cKinnell, ~astor of Chesterfield Church of the Brethren, who ~ave the invocation. 90-913 12/12/90 ~rs. ~or~ DeHart, A~si~tant County A~mlnlstrator for Legislative Services, led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. On motion o~ M_~. sullivan, seconded by Mr. ADplegate, the Board approved the minutes of November 28, 1990, a~ amended. Vote: Unanimo=s Sheri~ Clarence G. Williams introduced Major Garland Stafford, Chief Deput~; Major Roe Elliott, Jail Administrator; and ~ajor Nick Fuccella, Courts and Civil Process; his new administrative staff. Mr. Mares reported h~ att%~d the Education Advieor~ Committee to ~he Council on Information Management for the Coffee,wealth; the Appomattox Basin I~du~tTial Development Co~issien (ABIDOO); and several funetio~ for the chairman, in his absence. Mr. Co=tin reported he =~end~d a ~geting in Petersburg regarding redistricting at which several ef the County's legislator's addresse~ eQnCerns relative to ~his 6. Pd~TS TO1K~TP(H~E ACTI~, E~E~G]~{CYADDITIf~{S OR added It~ 11.C.6.d., ~et a Dat~ for P~lic Huuring Consider Charter Changes; added to existing I=~m 11-~-, ~ecutiv~ ~e~ion, an additional topic, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (al(3) of ~he code of virqinia, 1950, a~ discuss the condition, ac~isition and use of real property for p~lic purposes for sshool ~acilities; and adopted agenda, as ~ended. Vo~e: Unanimous ~n askS, Mr. Micas in~icated %he act~ai legislation relative to item 1 as outlined in the proposed paper would drafted prior to the p~lic hearing process; that the 7. ~5~IoNs AND ~ECIAL REC[~A~ITI(~S On motioa of th~ Boa=d, the following zesolution was adopted: ~E~AS, Mr. John V. ~azza, Sr. faithfully s~ed a~ a m~er of the Chesterfield County Airport Adviso~ Bo~d from its inception in 1972 until his death on October 28, 1990: and ~AS, ~. Mazza also ~aithfully served as a me,er of ,tho Capital Region Airport Co~issio~ ~rom 1984 u~il him death; a~d 90-914 12/12/9' WHEREAS, Mr. ~azza through his service an the above Bosrd the aviation comuni~y in chesterfield County and the Richmond W~EREAS, Mr. Mazza was widely recognised for his vast knowledge and keen understanding of the aviation ind~t~ ~d ~, MI. ~zza served his country in the United s~ate~ A~, ri~ing from the ra~ of Private to the ra~ cf Major upon his r~tirement in 19~7; as a teacher and band leader who took bands to two Rose Bowl~, five Orauge ~ls, five ~acy's Paza~es, the Cotton Bowl, the Sugar Bowl~ Dianey World, and the Mardi ~ras; people of this Co~t~ until his dea=h on Ootober 28, 1990. NOW, ~E~FO~ ~E IT RESOLVED, by the Ches=er~ield County Board of Supervisors that this resolution ~hall to his wi~e, ~s. Virginia Mazza; his son, Mr. John ~azza, Mazza's dedicated a~rvice to the p~ople of this County. Vote: Unan~ous Messrs. currin and Mayes presented the executed re~olution to Mrs. Virginia Mazza ~d other f~ily me--rs who were present. 7.B. ~R~- ~TOL~TC~NTS, TReASUReR'S OFFICE On motion o~ the Board, the ~ollowing resolution was adopted~ WI~P. EAS, ~. Violet Clements will retire from the Tr~asurer'~ Offio~, Chesterfield County, ~n Janua~ 1, 1991; and ~S, Ms. Clements has provided thirty years ~ality service to the citizens of Chemterfield Co~ty, coming tu work in th~ Treasurer's Office before the "c~te~ age" and s~e o~ bmr first rmspons~ilities included t~ing Co~ty invoices, payroll checks, an~ ~eporting payroll t~ record~ WS~S, I~ 1965, when the County account~t retire~, C!~msnt~ ass~ed responsibility for maintaining Chesterfield's primary finunci~l records ~til 1970 when th$ oonsoli~t~d a~ooun~ing funotions; an~ r~sponsible for m~in~aini~g and reporting ~11 records regarding th~ Treasurer's acco~t~ility; and ~REAS, In 1978, mba was selected by the dedication, lo,al and outstan~ng se~icu ~n muutln~ County's fast cha~ging finanoial r~ir~ents; and ~AS, I~ 1979, sh~ was sworn in as D~puty and faithfully ~d competently managed the Acco~t~ility Section ~ =ha Treasurer's O~ice until her retirement; and ~, Chest~rfiel~ County and the Board ~ Supe~i~or~ will miss ~s. Clements' diligen= services. N~, THEREFOR~ BE IT ~SOLV~, that the county Beard of Supervisors p~licly recognizes ~. Violet Clients and exten~ on behalf ~f its me~rs and =he ci=ize~ 90-915 12/1~/90 of Chesterfield County their appreciation for her service to AND, BB IT FtrRTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be pre~ented to ~, Clement~ and that this resolutis~ be permanently recorded e_meng the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield county, virginia, Vote: Unanimous Mr. Sullivan presented the e~ecuted resolution and a Jefferson Cup ~o Mrs. Clements and recognized her husband, who was present, and wished her well in her retirement. 7,C. ~S. FRANCES REAMS~ TP~J~5~E~'$ OFFICE on motion of tho hoard, the fellowin~ resole%ion was W}IEREA~ Ms. Frances ReamB ~ill retire from the and WHEREAS, Ms. Reams ha~ provided twenty year~ of qualit~ s~rvi~e ~e the ~itiz~ns of Chesterfield C~u~y; WHEREAS, In 19~ and ~e~ the followin~ ~ix years, Reams worked in the Treasurer's Office as a part-time workin~ durinq peak collection periods in th~ collection of r~al emta~ and p~r~onal property taxes~ and WHEREAS, M~. Reams became a full-tLm~ employee in January, 1971 and served in various tax collection and utility bill eolleetioa positions; and W~REA$, in 1~$5 Ms. Reams was promoted f~om Senior Account Clerk to senior Accounting Technicia~ and for the next five years, until retirement, she was responsible for reconciling all of the County's bank statements to assure all county funds were properly deposited, that the ~a~k properly credited all County deposits and all checks paid by the bank accent%ts; and W~EREA$, Ms. Rmams was also responsible for reporting outst~din~ check~ to the State Unclaimed Property Section; and W~EREAS, In all these positions Es. Reams was efficient, dependable, atwa~s courteous and willing to help other employee~ and CounUy citizens; and will m~s ~. Reams' diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board Supervisors publicly recognizes MS. Frances Reams and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens o~ Chesterfield County their appreciation for her service to the Count~. AND, BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED, that a cop~ of this Resolution be presented to MS. seams and ~hat this Resolution bu permanently rucordad among the papers of this BooEd of Supervisors of chesterfield County, virginia. Mr. Sullivan pre~ented the executed reEclutlcn to Mrs. Reams and recognized her husband, who was present, and wished her well in her retirement. 9Q-915 On mo%ion Of %h~ Board, kh~ following rexolution was adopted: ~R~S, D~tective J~e~ Rud~ will retire ~rom the chesterfield Co~t~ Police Depar~ent on Janua~ 1, 1991; and ~E~AS, D~t~ctive Rudd has provided twenty-nine years o~ ~E~ Detective ~dd has s~rved the Co~y in the capacity of Patrol Office=, Fraud I~vestigator, and Detective; and ~E~AS, Detective Rudd was selected to ~come one o~ the cowry Police Depar~en~ with m~y years of loyal and will miss De~ective R~dd's diligent service. NOW, T~RE~ BE IT ~SQL~, that thi~ BOa~ O~ su~rvisors p~liely recognizes Detective J~es Rudd and Chesterfield County their appreciation for his ~ervice to the ~D, BE IT ~ ~SOLV~, that a cody of ~his Resolution be presented to Detective Rudd and that chis Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield Co.tM, Virginia, Vote: ~animou~ Mr. Sullivan presented the executed resolution and Jefferson present, and wished h~ well in his retirement. 7.E. MR. EDGAR JItSTU$r UTILITIES DEPAR~I~I~T On motion c~ the Board, the ~ollawing resolution was adopted: WEERF~kS, Mr. Edgar Justus ~ Jr., will retire fr~ the ~d ~E~S, Mr. Justus has provided twenty-four years recently as Pield services su~rvisor; and ~E~S, Chesterfield Co.tx and th~ Board of Supervisors will miss ~r. Jus~us' dili~en~ s~rvice~ and ~E~S~ ~. Justus ha~ untiringly ~arved Chesterfield County as a leader, motlvat ~r, and mor~ i~por~a~kly, ~en~itive and ~arinq individual; and ~R~S, ~r. ~stus was ins~r~ental in the ~plementa- which has positively al[acted the accuracy and eificiencx meter r~ading; and ~S, ~. Justus was influential ia =h~ d~velo~nt the ~ployee Incentive Proqr~ a~d the ~D1oyee-o~-the-Month 90-917 12/12/90 MOW, THF~q~FORE BE IT RESOLVED, that thi~ BOaXd of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mr. E~ar Justus, Jr. and extends on behalf of its Members and the citizens of Chester- fie!~ County their auDr~¢iation for hie []arvi0e to the County. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution be presented to Hr. J~s~us and that ~his resolution ~e Dermanenti~ recorded among the pape~ of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Sullivan presented the executed resolutien to Mr. Justus and resognized his wife, who was present, and wished him well in his =e%irement. 7.F. MS. JAC~nT~ C~, CIRC%r~T COURT CLERK'S OPFICE On ~otion of the Board, the following resolution was ado~t~d~ WEEREAS, Me. Jao~91in ~erald will retire fr~ uhe Circuit Court Clerk's Office, Chesterfield County, on Janua~ 1, 1991; and ~R~S, During the ~ears that Ms- Gerald was e~loyed with ~he Circui= Co~= Clerk Office, ~h~ experienced ~ny changes creating i~teresti~g and sometime d~fflcult challenges, sh~ me~ =h~se challenges most enthusiastically and effectively~ and Clerk's Office and will be missed, not only by her co-workers County that she served so w%ll. NOW, TH~FO~ BE IT RESOLED, that this Board ~i Supmrvi~orz p~licly reoo~izes Ms. Jau~elin Geral~ an~ chesterfield County their aDDr~ciation ~or her servi~e to the County. ~, D~ IT F~ER ~SOL~, that a co~ of this Resolution be pre~nted to Ms. Gerald and that thi~ Resolution be pendently recorded ~ong =he papers of this Board oi supervisors of Chaste!field Co~ty, Virginiu. Vote: U~animous Mx. Sullivan presented the execut~ resolution to Ms. ~rald and wishu~ her well in her r~tirem~nt. There were no hearinq of citizens on unscheduled matters or claims. 9. DEF~A~ 9.A. AUT~O~TZK T~ C~KATION OF SIX CO~CTIONA5 ~F.%LTH ~OSITION$ ~OR ~ ~FF'S O~¢~ TO Pi~OV/DE MEDICAL SE~VICE-q AT '1'~ JA~L Mr. HaK~er stated the Board, at the September 12, 1990 meeting, d~ferre~ ~usid~ration of th~ cruatlon of six correctional health positions for the Sheriff's Office to provide i~-hou~e m~dical ~ezvices at the Jail in ordex for 90~918 12/12/90 private vendor contract services. He brle~ly provided an Afte~ some ~i~cussion of the matter, it was on motion o£ Mr. Applegate, seconded b~ Mr. Da~iel~ resolved that the Board approve and authorize the creation of five (5) correctional h~alth assistant positions and one (1) correctional health supervisor position for thm Sheriff's O~i~e to ,provide in-house medical services at the Jail; transierred budgeted overtime ~unds to cover a projected shortfall o~ $~,673 in mrofessicnal H~alth Sexvices for th~ r~ai~der of FYgl; an~ extended the current contract with Prison Health Services through June 30, 1991, whilo tho in-house ~ransition occurs, with the assumption t~t in-honse health servieea Will be Vote: Unanlmuus 9,B- ~%*RC~K OF FI~ DIRT FOR CO%r~R R~PAI~ AT FORT LANDFILL ~r. Ham~er stated the Board, at its November 28, 1990 meeting defeIrad consideration a request to ~urchase fill dirt for cover repair at the Fort Darling land~ill to resolve concerns background operation of tho iaoility; recurring maintenance requirements; use of the Reserve for Capital Projeet~ Account versus the General ~u~d Ccnting=~¢y A¢cou~%t and/or the General be used; etc. on motion ~f Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayem, the Board authorized the Cowry A~inistrator to entez into an agreement with shoosmith BrotherE, Inc., to D~chase 80,O00 c~ic yards of fill material to be u~ in the renovation of the Fort Darling Landfill cover; and appropriated $180~000 from the Reserve for Capital Project Account for the purchase of said materials ~d necessa~ measures to store it in an enviro~entally acugp~able maker. (It is not~ =he material can be stockDiled on t~e site ~til the actual co,er repairs can be funded in the CaDital Implovement Progz~ (CIP}; the actual cap const~ction wi~h associated drainage and erosion connrol meaaurea will cos= ~ additional $700,000 and staff ha~ i~clud~d a ~e~t for thi~ DIoject in th~ FY91-92 CIm.) Vo~e: Unanimous 9.C. At~i~31 N~%Tn 9.C.t. CAPITAL RE~IC~ AIR~ORT CO~ISSI~N Om the Capital Region Airport co~ission %o fulfill ~e ~r. Matra, Jr,'s qualifies=ions and backgroun= to serve on the most oognizant of Mr. Mazza, Sr.'s outstanding service to the County and its citizens and held him i~ the highes~ esteem; however, ~elt it in the best interests ~f th~ Cowry, at this critical ~ime, tha~ Chesteriield be re9resented on th~ Capital Region Airport co~ission by an elected oi~icial since other officials. ~ey indicated t~at this was in no wa~ a discredit 90-919 County. The vote being Taken on Mr. John v. Mazza, Jr. being appointed fo the Capital Region Airport Commie,±on (representing Chesterfield County at-large), which term is effective immediately and will ~Pire April 30, 1991 was as foltow~: Ayes: Mr. Mayms. There being no ether votes, the motion failed. The vote taken on ~r. C. F. Currin, Jr. being appointed to the Capital Region Airport Co~mission {representing chesterfield County at-larqe), which term i~ effective ir~nediately s/~d will expiIe April 3Q, 1992 was as ~oltows: Ayes~ ~r. S~llivan, Flr~ Applegate and ~r. Daniel. AbsTenTion; Mr. Currin and Mr. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board reappeie~ed ~r. Peter C. Ward, representin~ ~idlo~hian District; Mrs. Betty M. Beverly, representing Bermuda District; and Mrs. Patricia Y. Borin~ky to metre a three year term on the Chesterfield Com~unlty Services Boaid, whose terme ar~ effective January 1, 1991 ~nd will ezDire December 31, 1993. OF C~R-~M~FIELD, 1978, AS AM]~'DEDr BY A~ENDING AND REENACT- IN~ SECTION 14.1-26 RELATING TO '~HE IS~UANC~ OF W~TOR VEHICLE LICENSES Mr. Micas stated thi~ date end time had been advertised for a public hearin~ to censi4er aa ordinance to ~mend the Code o~ the County of Chesterfield, 1978, az amended, relating to the issuance of motor vehicle licenses. Mrs. Arline Mc~uire, Treasurer, was present and explaine~ the proposed ordinance. There was di~cuseion regarding the number percentage of delin~!uent t~es on mobile homos; enforcement mechanisms and ~hat could be utilized by the County and estimated cost~ involved to ensure collection of said taxes; ¢~rtain exemptions for the ~lderty from the ~roDosed ordinance~ etc. proposed ordinance. On ~otion Of ~r. Daniel, seconded by F~r. Sullivan, thc Board adopted the following ordinance: ~NOFLDINAI~CETOAI~ENDT~KCODEOF~ CO~NT~OF ~RRNACTING ~ 14.1-~6 ~.~TING TO~ ~SS~ANCK field County: 12/~2/90 m m m (1) Thah Section 14.1-26 of the Code of %be County of chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted as follows: !a~ment of personal property taxes ~rerequisite to issuance. No vehicle so taxable skaii be licensed unles~ and until the applicant ~or such .license shall have produced satisfac- tory evidence that all personal property taxes upon th~ or previously owDe~ by the applicant and upon any tangible personal property owned by the applicant that is used or usable as a dwelling, which pe~sonal p~opert~ taxes have been assessed or are assessable aqainst such applicant, have been Mrs. McGuire requested th~ ordinance be e~eotlve ~arch 1, 1991, ~r. Daniel amended his motion, second~dbyMr. Mayer, to adept the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE TO AB~{D 'r~ CODE OF x~ COUNTY OF ~z~TE~I~.n, I978, A~ A~Hi~D~D, BY AI~DiN~ AND I~E~{ACTING ~ i4.1-26 P~ATING TO '~ I~UANC~ BE I~ OP~AI~ by the Bca~d of Supmrvisoss cf Chsst~r- {i¢ld County: (~) Thut Section ~4.1-26 ~f the Cud~ Of th~ CO~t~ Of Chesterfield~ 1978, as amended, i~ amended and reenacted as ~ollowa: Sec. 14.!-26. ~ssuing; display of tags; transferability~ No vehicle so taxable shall be license~ unless and until tho applicant i~r such license shall hav~ produced satisfa~- tor~ evidence that all personal property taxes upon the vehicle to be licensed, upon any other vehicle currently owned or previously owned by the applicant and upon any tangible personal property owned by th~ applica~zt that is used er usable as ~ dwellinq, which personal property taxes have been assessed or ars assessable against such applicant, have been The e~feetive ~te of this ordinanc~ is March 1, 1991. ll.A, ~OLUTIONIIF~_~/)IRG~STUDY OF CONSOLIDA_T~ON OF LOCAL ~rs. Joan smith, Director of social services, presented an overview of the proposed r=soluticn rc~arding the request for a study of consolidation of local sc=del services dupar=m~n=s. ~r. Charles Quaiff and Ms. Meg Doncvan were also present. There was discussion relative to the ramifications of such action to client services without proper study, evaluation and planning~ adoption of similar resolutions Dy other local jurisdictions, the Virginia Association ~ Ceunties and Virginia Municipal League reqliesting that iur~hez ~tudy and 90-921 i2/12/90 evalua=ion be considered prior to actual consolidation of said ageacies; etc. After further discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Sullivan, resolution: Wt~EREAS~ Chesterfield County and the City of Colu~ial Heights have had a joist Department of social Services since the 1950's: and WHEREAS, Both localities are mutually satisfied and pleased with tke consolidated arrangemeat cf delivering social services to their citizens; and WI{EBEAS, The Commonwealth of Virginia is initiating plans for the consoli~tion of local social service agencies due to current fiscal constraints; and consolidation of ~rtain ~ial he.ice depar~nt~ may be a positive means of rendering services, provided it benefioial an~ agreeable to the jurisdictions involved~ ~s~ such rest~ct~ing would be unwise and to the impact on client services, Cos% =ffuctiv~n~ss and local citizen participation. N~, T~FO~ BE IT ~SOLV~, tha~ %he Chesterfield Board of Supervisors hereby re~emtm the Virginia ~mn~ral ASSe~ly tO est~lish a joint oo~ittee with appropriate local representation to study a~ analyz~ the appropriateness of consolidation of local mmciat service depar~ents and evaluate localities and citizens. ~D, BE IT FUR~ ~MOL~, %hat a copy of this General Vote: Unanimous ii.B.1. CHEb'rr~FIELD (X~9~3NTTY SERVICES BOARD (CLOVER on motion of Nr. ApDlegate, seconded by ~r, Sullivan, Board suspended its rule~ to allow sLmultan~oUs nominauion/appoinnmant cf a representative for ~hs Clover Hill District to s~rv¢ on the Chesterfield Community Services Vote: Unanimous On motion of Er. Applegate, seuonded bM Mr. ~ayes, the Board simultaneously nominated/appointed ~r. Larry J. Ellictt, representing the Clove= Hill District, to serve a ~hrue year term on ~h~ Chesterfield CoK~unity Services Board, which ~srm is sffectiv= January 1, 1991 and will expire December 1993. ll.B.2. P~P~I~9~LA~PEAI~BOA~D Mr. Currin nc~inate~ Mr. Linwood Carroll to serve on the Personnel Appeals Board. Mr. ~ayes nominated Dr. william 90-922 12/12/90 After brief discussion, Mr. Currin declared the nominations closed and requested that resumes on the candidates be p~ovided 5o the Board prior to the January 9, 1991 ll.B.3. ESTABLISH AND APPOINT A CO~MITTEE ON ~ POLICY AND INFRA~TRU~ NEED~ h=ld on August 29, 199D at Clover Hill High School, directed infrastructure needs and financial resources to pay for these needs. He stated, subsequent to that meeting, staff has developed and is recommending the establishment of a Co~ittee on Revenue Policy and Infrastruct~s Needs to acc~plieh s~e a~d outli~ed the proposed Co~ittee'~ charge, responsibili- ties, ~oals and objectives, composition, etc. Discussion, questions and Cormnents ensued relative to the establishment o~ said Committee with ne appropriation until after the Committee has ~ubmitted a budqet proposal to the Board for review: appointment of one member from each magisterial district by the District Supervisor as opposed to =he nomina=ion/appoln~m~nt ~ro~e~; nomiuatlon/aDpoln~ment of the Chairperson of the Ce~ittee by th~ Board rather than the Only the Chairman of the Board: the nomination/appointment process si other represent=tires for the Committee; that there be no 6iscussien by the =ommittes regarding impact fee~ until after such time es the ne~t seeeion o~ the ~eneral Assembly has recessed; that all information from the Committee be channelled through the County Administrator to the Boar~; that =he County School Board representative of ~he Corm~ittne not be a ~chool Board mmmber or ~taff person but rather an individual with a strong interest in ~he school system; std. on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved and authorized the establishment of a 13 member Co~dittee o~ Reven~e Policy a~d Inirast~ctur= Needs to be nominated and/or appointed January 9, 1991, with the understanding thut there be no appropriation of funds for said Co~i~ee until auuh time aa the Cnmmittee has brought forward a budget p~oposal for review and consideration by the Board; that the Committee not ad,ross impact ~ee until a~ter the next session of th~ General ~sembl¥ has receJse~; that one member from eao~ magisterial ~i~triot be appoint~ by the District Supervisor; that the Chairman of said Co:m~ittee be nominated and appointed by the Board cslleotively; that the Homebuilders Association si Riob_mond, Che~=er~ield CountF Business Council, League of Women Voters and County School Board rec~m~end a representative ~or nomination, with the School Beard representative being an individual with a strong interest in the School SysteJ~ rather than a School Board member ~r staff person; that the Board of Supervisors nominate individuals represeating the financial Industry, neighborhood orqanlzations and manufacturing industry; and that all informs:ion be channelled through the County Administrator tc the Board members. i1.C. CC~ ITemS ll.e.i. Rg~UEST8 FOR BIN~O/RAFFLEPERMITS OB motion 0f Mr. Applegute, seconded by 5Lt. Sullivan, Board approved requests for bingo/raffle permits for following organizations for calendar ?ear 1991: the the 90-923 12/12/90 Beach COK~nnity Grange %958 Thomas Dale Music Ecozt~r Club South RicbJnond Rotary Club MidlothianBand Boasters ~t- Augustine Cathelic Church Resident Council of Lucy Corr Nurnfng Home Manchester Volunteer Rescue ~quad ~id-Citius civic Association Richmond James River Lions Club Ettrick Ys~th Sport~ Association Vote: Unanimous Bingo Biago/~af flu ~affle Raffle Bingo/Raffle Raffle Raffle Bingo/Raffle Bingo/Raffle Raffle 11.C.2. $~ WATE~ MA~ ~I~£~ANC~ &~w~'T FOR On motion of Hr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board authorized the County Admin~mtrator to S~OCRtO a storm Water Management ~alnt~n~nce Agreemmnt with thm d~v~loper of "North oaks, section A", with the understanding that the County's only involvement is ~he a~surance ~ha~ the Maintenance Agreement is to be followed by the owner. (A copy of said Agreement is ~iled with the papers of this Board.) 11.C.3. F~ARD ZONING ORDI/~ANCE RI~U~RDING Blnr.mOARDS TO "£~ Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative to deferral of ~orwarding a Zoning Ordinanc~ amendment regardiDg billboards ~o the Planning commission for recommendation until after a wezk session coul~ be hel~ by the Board to discuss and/or comment on the proposal~ etc. On motion of Mr. Coffin, seconded by Mr, Sullivan, the Boa=d deferred un~il February t3, 1991, an amendment to the zoning Ordinance re~ardin~ billboarda mhd scheduled u work s~ssion on Vote: Unanimous 11.C.4. SC~0OL BOARD C~RANTS On motion of Mr. Apple~ate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approDriated $35,000 to the school Grant Fund for revenues and expenditures for the Ffgl Adult Career A~essment Program Grant ~rom the State Department of Education, which grant will provide career assessment services for disadvantaged adults; appropriated $10,000 to the School Grant Fund for revenues and expenditures for t~e GRADS Giant D~Dartmsnt of Education, which ~rant will be used to develop changes and appropriated revenues and expendltures~ totalling $114, 847,4I, tO the appropriate categeries as ~cllows: 90-924 12/12/90 FY90 Head Start FY90 Chapter I Reqular FY90 Chapter I summer FYgl Special Education Inservice Training ~Y91 Drug Free Total Chan§e vote: Unanimous D~CRI~ION OF CS~%N~K revenue and appropriations revenue and appropriations Decrease estimated Federal revenue and appropriations Increase estimated Federal Increase estimated Federal A~OUNT 73,630.00 59,326.00 44,020.59) 850.00 25r062.00 $114,847.%1 ll.C.5. AMENDED DISTRICT ~', Currin disclosed to the Board that he ow'as approximately three-iourth$ (3/4) of an acre which may be within the Johnson's Creek Drainage District a/~d drains to Johnson's Creek, desisted a potential conflict of interest pursuant uu the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himsel£ f~cm the meeting. on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Bo~=d appropriated an additional $121,255.85 to refund nnexpended and accrued interest earnsd by =he County fei ~he period ~rom August, 1976 through June, 1955, inclusive, on development ~ees received in connection with the Johnson's Creek ~ubdivision and Development Drainage District to be refunded to contributors to the District, which a~ennt, in addition to $177,873.57 for refund of unexpendsd development fees, will bring the total appropriation to re~und unex-pended development Ay~s~ ~k. Sullivan, Mr. Applegute, ~r. Daniel and ~r. Ma~es. Absent: Mr. Currin, ~r. Curri~ returned ~e =he meeting. 11.¢.6. SKT DATE FO~ PUBLIC ~EA~LINGS ll.C.6.a. TO CONSIDE~ TAX KF~PTION =~ 0~ ~ ( 0n motion o~ ~. Applegate, Board set the date of J~uary 9, 1991, at 7:00 United Network for Organ Sharing ll.C.6.h. ~O CONSID~TA/~IONP. F~N/F~TOF C~r~FIELD ALT~ATI~]~, 1NC. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the ~eard set the date of January 9, 1991, at 7:00 p.m., for a p~blic hearing to consider a ta~ exemption r=qx~est ~rom chesterfield Alternatives, Inc. 12/12/90 Vote: Unanimou~ ll.c.fi.c. ~0 C~STD~ 'l~ CONV~YkNC~ OF A ]~ARC~L ~N -l'~ On motion of Mr. Applegate, secende~% by ~dr. Sullivan, the Board set the date of January 9, 1991, at 7:~8 p.m., for a public hearing to consider the oonveyanue eia parcel in =he Airport Industrial Park and authorize the County Administrator to enter into ~ ~alez contract. Vote: Unanimous ll.C.6.d. TO OONSID~R C~AN~ES IN 'r~ COUNT~ CFa%RT~ On motion of ~r. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivun, th= Board set the date of January ~ 19~1~ at 7:00 ~.m., ~or a public hearing tc consider the following proposed changes i~ the 0ounty Charter; 1. Impact fees for new residential construction; and 2. Authorization for the Board of Supervi~or~ to block a secondary ~ublio road which ham becom~ hazardous due to over-utilization; and 3. Permission for Chesterfield to automaticall~ incorporate stats motor vehicle violation amendments within the County Code. Vo~e: Unanimous ll.c. 7. DONATION TO F~T ~IKW VOLU~TI~R RF~COE ~AD FOR B~ILDLNG P~I~FE~S On motion of Mr. ApDlegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, uhe Board approved a donation, not to exceed $3,500.00, ~e~ the Fire Department to uhe Building Official's office to Day for County permit and inspection ~ees for the Forest View Volunteer Rescue s~uad substation a= Fire eta%ion %9 (~u~erd), which practice is in accordance with past practices for County Publio S~fety Building~ inoluding Volunteer Fire ~d Re~cum S~a~ Buildings. (It is noted %he Fire Depar~s~t wiil pay ~he necemsary fees from the budgeted doltish line item.) Vo%~: Ununimoua on motion of Mr. A~plega~e, secon~e~ by Mr. sullivan, the Board transferred $6~0 from the Midlothlan District Three Cent Road Fund to the Department of P~rks and Recreation to a~sist youth basketball teams in the Midlethian area which do not quali~y for co-sponsorship in the use of school facilities. ll.D.1. STW/~ETL~GHT~UEST On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by F~r. Sullivan, the Board denied obtaining a ~ost e~tlmate for th~ ir~tallati~n o~ a street light at 8319 Trout L~ne, Clover Hill District, as ~aid location .did not meet the ~equired criteria. 90-926 12/12/90 On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by gr. Mayes, the Board adopted the fallowing resolution~ WHEREA~, HoDkina Road is a major no,th~south arterial in the County; and ~s, Th~ volvo o~ traffic using Hopkins Road ~ER~S, Th~ volvo of traffic utilizing Hopkins Road is beginning ho approach the capacity of the road; and Colby's priority list for highway improvement~; and ~s, The V~rginia Depar~ent of Trans~rtation and ches=~rfi~l~ =o~y has ~v~lop~ a ~si~n for widening o~ Hopktn~ Road to four lanes from Beul~ Road to Inca Drive; and ~A$, The wideniug of Hopkins Road is e~pected proce~ in phases with the initial phase to consist of the Drive. NOW, ~FO~ BE IT RESOLED, that the Chesterfield ~ounty Board o~ Supervisors suDports ~'s design to widen ~ges ~OT to procee~ wi~h ~he construction of the initial Vu~e: ~r. Daniel sta~ed he felt the Droposed resolution ~ppropria=e resident, e~ressing s~port for ths new design. lt.E. F~ILITIES DEPA~X~T IT~4S 11.E.1. FUBLICHEAP/I~G~O ~C~SIDER(~DINA~C~0VACA~A 50 FOOT AND VARIABLE ~ STUB ROAD A~D TWO 20 FOOT ~~i~T~ XN~0OD~OI~T ~U~l%r~sI~e SECTIO~ Z ~. Sale stated this date and time had ~ecn advertised for a p~lio h~azing ~o oonside~ an oz~inan~ ~e~sting the vacation of a 50 foot an~ vari~le width st~ road and two 20 fcc= slop~ easement~ in ~iatwo~ Fores= s~ivision, section 2, Blocks G and H, ~o one c~ fo~ard to speak in favor of or against th~ ~rODOS~d 0rdinano~, On motion of ~. Mayes~ seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board adopted the following ordinance= ~ O~I~CE whet=by the CO~ OF ~STE~IELD, VIRSINIA, ("G~OR"), vacates to $ & L BUI~ERS, INC., and 90-9t7 i2/i2/~0 E/fOELLER~ (GRANTEE), a 50 foot and variable width Stub Road and two 20 feet slope easemunts, in Mistwood Forest su2odivisi0n, ~ection 2, Matoaca District, Chesterfield, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the Cl~k'$ Office of the Circuit Court o~ Chesterfield County in ~lat Book 46, Pages 71, 72 and 73. WHF~EASn Rope~ DevelOpment C~mp~, p~titioned th~ Board of S~pervisorE of Chunter~iel~ Co,ay, virginia to vacate a St~ Road ~d two slope ~a~m~nts in Mistwood Forest ~ivi- sion, Section l, Mat~aea District, chesterfield County, Virginia more garticularly sh~ on a plat of record ia Clerk's Office of ;he Circuit Court o~ said County in Plat Book 46, Pages 71, 72 and 73, made by Charl~ C. Tuwnes & As$0ciat~s, P.C., dated May 11. 1986. The ~t~ road and two slope eas~ents petitioned to be vacated are more fully ~e$cribed as folluw~ 5O foot ~d vari~le width St~ Road and o~ which is more fully sh~, on a plat ~ dated October 11, ~990, a cop~ of which is attache~. 15.1-~3t of the C~e o~ virginia, 1950, as ~ended, by ~OW ~FO~, B~ ~T O~N~ BY ~E BO~ OF OF CMES~IE~ CO~, VIRGINIA: That pursuant to Section 15-1-4~2(b] o~ the C~e Virginia, 1950, as ~ended, the aforesaid St~ Road and two attached plat. This Ordinance shall b~ in full force and e~=~ in accur~an~ with S~ction 15.1-482(b) df the Code of Virginia, 1950, as ~end~d, and a certified co~ of =him Ordinance, together with the plat attuched h~r~tc shall be recorded no sooner th~ thirty days herea~nar in the Clerk's O~ice o~ the Section 15.1-485 of =he Code o~ Vir~inla, 1950, am ~nd~d. ~e effect of this Ordinance p~auant to Section 15.1-483 ~ort~on of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall v~at fee ~ple titl~ to the oenterline of the a%~ roa~ and two slope withi~ the Mistwood Forest $~divisLon, section 2, fr~ and clear of any rights o~ p~li~ Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be inde~ in the of the Co,tV of Chesterfield, as grater, ~d S & L BUI~, INC., and EDW~ E. ~OEL~ and ~OL~ P. ~OEL~, (husb~ and wife), or their successors in ti%lc, as grantee. 90-928 11.E.2. CONS~T IT~F~ 11.E.2.a. APPROVAL OF WASTEWAT~ CONTRACT FOR WIRTFa/POCK CROSSING SHOPPING C~£~a~ OFFSIT~ EXT~ION On motion of Mr. Sulli¥~n, seconded by Mr. Applegater the Beard approved the following wastewater ContraQt and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary Wi~terpook Crossing Shopping Center Off~ite Project ~umber Developer: Winterpock Cros~in§ Gontractor: Piedmont Construction Co., Inc. Contract kmount: ~$%~mated ~etal - $194,4~0.25 Total Estimated Count~ Coat: Wastewat~r (Over~izing) (Re~und thr~ connections) Wastewater (Offsite) (Refund thru connections) ~stimated D~veloper (Offsite) $ 16,125.25 $ 40,5S5.48 $137,769.52 5P-9~-$90730 5P-5835Q-890733 Vote: Unanimous ll.E.2.b. ACCEPTANCE OF i~XIONS OF WHla-£~ PAP~4AY ~ on motion cf Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board accepted on beh=lf of ~he cau_~t~ portions of Whitten Parkway from whitten Realty, A Virginia Gener=l Partnership, which dediea2ion is a requirement of Planning for the Virginia Power - Treble S~b~tation, and authorized th~ County copy of aaid plat is filed with the papers of this Boar~.) Vote: UnanLmous ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL OF LAND FOR ~A~LIN ~ reAR,WAY 11.E.2.O.1. ~ MES._~.~. ~IC~AEL T. BA~R ARD J. K. TI~HO~ On motion of Mr. Appiegate, seconded by ~r. Sullivan, the Board accepted on behalf of the County th~ conveyance of 1.335 acre parcel of land for Hamlin creek Par~way ~rom ~eeers. Michael T. Ba~r u~d J. K- Ti~mon~, which dedication is a requirement of Planning for Old Centralia Crossing Shopping Center, and authorized the Co~21%y A~ministr&tor to exeeut~ the necessary de~d. (I~ is noted' a copy o~ said plat is filed with the papers of thi~ 11.~.2.~.2. FRC~ OLD C~qTHALXA C]tOSSING A~SOCIATES O~ ~otion of ~r. Appleqate, ~uconded by Mr. Sullivan, Board accepted O~ behalf of ~he Cuun=y the conveyance of a .OO5 acre parcel of lund for ~amlin Creek Parkway from Old Centralia Crossing Assecia%ea, L.P., which dedication is requirement of Plaa%ning for Old Cantralia Crossing shopping Center, and authorized ~he coun=y Adminiztrator to execute the eeeessar~ deed. (It is noted a copy 0£ said pl~= is filed with the pa9er~ o~ nhis Board.) Vs~e: Unanimous 90-929 i2/12/90 11.E.2.d. ACCE!mTANCE OF PARCEL OF LAND ALONG WIi~U~!~D(iK ROAD On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr, sullivan, the Board accepted on behalf of the County the conveyance o~ a 0.3774 acre ~arcel along Wi~terpock Roud from Mr. Fruuk Hart, Jr., which dedication ia required for the construction Of West Hensley Road in proposed Summerford Section A, and d~d. {It is noted a copy of said plat i~ filed with 11.E.2.e. ACCEPTANCE OF IAmmuOP DEDICATTON OFF OF C~URCH ~OAD ll.E.2.e.1. FROM~. AND~S. ROOSEVELT P. MC%~JRR~N On mo2ion of ~r, Applegate, ~e¢onded by ~r- ~ullivan, the Board accepted on behalf o~ the C~unty the conveyance of ~ variable width parcel of land o~ of Church Road from ~rs. Aifreda MoMurren and Mr. Roosevelt P, MoMurren, (wife and husband}, which dedioatio~ is for th~ Matoaca District Rural Addition Project, und authorized the County Administrato~ to exeo~te the necessary deed. (It is noted a copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) ll.E.2.e.2. FROM MESSRS. JIR~TUS BAU~H AND JOHN BAU(~H On motion cf Mr. ADpleqate, seconded by Fir. Sullivan, the Board accepted on behalf of the County the conveyance of a variable width parcel of land off of Church Reed frc~ Messrs. Junlus and John Baugh, whinh dedication is for the Matoaca District Rural Addition Project, and authorized the County Administrate5 to execute the necessary deed. (It is noted a ~opy of said plat is filed with the papers o~ this Board.) Vote: Unanimous ll.~.2.f. (X1NVEYANCE OF EASieST TO VIP~INIA ELECTRIC AND ~ C~H~ANY AT ROBIO~S '~T.~TAA'y Sr~OOL On motion of ~r. A~plegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute' an ea~mment aqree~ent b~twee~ Chesterfield County and Virginia ~lectric and Power Company to install underground =able within ~ 15 foot easement ~t Robious Elementary School, which roq~Aest is for s~rvice (It is noted a copy of said plat is fited with the papers this Board.) ll.E.2.q. P~U~ST FOR P~ION TO ~C3~O;%C~ O~ ~OL~f~ ~ STATI~ SITE LOCAm~u OFF OF HARBOUR POI~I~ ROAD on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by ~Lr. Sullivan, the Board approved a request from ~r. and ~rs. Gary L. Rogers ~ubject to the execution of a license agreement. (It im noted a copy of said plat is filed wi~h the papers oi this Board.} Vote: Unanimous 90-930 12/12/9U ll.E.2.h....P~_ I~.~T FOR PEP~ISSION TO ~CKOAC~ ~ RX~STING V~RI~tLE ~i13~[I DP-~INAGE AND SEWE~ 8ASE~T AC~0~S On motion ef ~r. Applegate, seeonde~ by ~r. Sullivan, the Doard appzove~ s request from ~. R. Lowl~y, Inc., for permission ~cr a portion of a driveway to encroach on an 1, Block K, Re,shire, Section 11, s~bject to tho oxen=rich of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy e~ said plat i~ filed with th= papers of this Board.) ll.B.2.i. ~E~EST FOR P~SSIf~ TO MAK~ W~J~WAY I~PROVE~F~S WITHIN AN ~STING 32 ~OOT UTILXTY AND PED~STP~AN 0n motion of Mr. Appl~ate, meconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved a request from Roxshire ~ivic Association for permission ~o construct a walkway within an existing 32 foot utility and pedestrian walkway easement on Lot 8 in Victoria cor~ons, which walkway will allow residents in Roxshire 1 access to riverside wellness and Fitness and the Briarwood Pool, without havin~ to use Robious Road, subject to th~ execution of a license agneemenh. (It is noted a copy of said plat is filed with the papers of thi~ Board.) ll.B.2.j. REQUEST FR(~I ~, BA~NE~ MCLAU~I~ FOR PKIIMI~ION TO CO~iu.'r~.UCZ A D~IVEWAY ~F/q~i'TN A ~ ~ KN0~N AS RI%q~NIEW ROAD Mr. Sale briefly explained Mr. Barney McLaughlin's request for permission ~o construct a d~iveway to his home within a 25 foot ri~ht-of-way known as Riverview Road and stated staff reco~nended d~nial of said re,est because Mr. MoLaughlin has no recorded access to ~non Church Roa~ from the termination of the prc~o~ed driveway. Mr. McLaughlln stated ho was agreeable to vacate a p~rtion of the road right-of-way. Mr. Paul G. Kueh~, an adjacent property owner, voiced opposition to approval cf the request ~o permit construction of ~he requested driveway within ~he 25 foot right-of-way 5s it would generate increased traffic along After lengthy ~iscnssisn relative ~o ~he propomed request, it was generall~ agreed to recess to permit those involved to discuss possible alternatives which may resolve the matter and be acceptable to the land owners. Mr. Currin requested that a meeting be scheduled invelvin~ sta~f~ the applioa~t~ area residents and himself to further address concerns r~Iative ~o thus matter. On motion o~ F~. Currin, seconded by Mr. sullivan, the Board deferred until January 9, 1991, at 7:00 p.m, a request ~rom Mr. Barney McLaughlin to construct a drivewa~ to his home within a 25 foot D/limproved right-cC-way known as Rivervi~w Roa~. Vote: Unanimous 90-93~ 12/12/90 Mr. Sale pre~ent~d the Board with a report cn the d~v~lopar water and sewer oontraet~ executed by the County kdmlnlstrato~. I1.F. Mr. Ram~ey presented the Boa~d with a ~tatu~ report on the General Fund Contingency Au~ount, General Fund Balance, Reserve ~or Future Capital Projects, District Road and Agenda. Mr. Ramse¥ stated the Virginia Department o~ Transportation has formally nct±~ied the County of the acceptance of the following roads into the State Secondazy System: ADDITIONS CRO~S CREEK - $~CTI0~ C (~ffee%ivs 11~19/90) Route 3773 (Crossings Way) - Fro~ O.82 mile East Route 3776 %o 0,05 mile Rest Route 3777. 0,14 Mi. Route 3777 (Crossings Ridge Drive) - From Route 3773 to 0.07 mile Sou~ Route 3773. 0.07 Mi. ~A~OUI~ RIDER (~netive Ll115/90) Route 4848 (~=rbour Ridge Road] - From Route 3200 to 0.10 mile Northwest Route 3200, 0.10 Mi. LON~ COVE; WOODLAK~ (~eotive 11/19/~0) Route 3634 (Long Cove Road) - From 0.12 mile East Route 3500 to 0.36 mile Southeast Route 3600. Route 3638 (West Bay Readl - From Routs 3634 to 0.02 mile Northeast Route 3634. Route 3839 (Long Cove Place) - From Routm 3634 to 0.16 mile Northeast Route 3634. Route 365~ (Long Cove Court) - From Route 3634 to 0.04 mile East Route 3634. 0.24 Mi. 0.02 Mi. 0.16 Mi. 0.04 Ni. ADDITIONS (E~uctive 11/15/90~ Ro~te 3490 (Done~ai Road North] - From 0.36 mile South Route 659 to 0.~ mile South Route ~59. ROUte 483~ (Fermanagh Drivel 0.09 mile Northwest Route Route 3494 (Derryv~ash Drive) - Fmom 0.06 mile Southwest Route 3490 to 0.37 mile Northeast Route 3490. Route 4~31 (Lifford Lanol - From Route 3494 to 0,16 mile North Route 3494. Route 4830 (Teeli~ Cou~t) - From Route 3494 to 0.06 mile North Route 3494. Route ~497 (Bunorana Lane) - From Route 3494 to 0.05 mile Southeast Route 3494. L~N~T~ 0.47 Mi. 0.09 Ri. 0.43 ~i. 0.16 Mi. 0.06 ~i, 90-932 1~/12190 ;tDDITIONS Route 3496 (Foyle Drive] - Prom Route 3494 U.15 nile ~orthwest Route 3494. LENGTH O.15 Mi. 1I.E. EEECUTIVE BE~SI~ Hr. Currin disclosed to tho Board that he LB cO-owner of property a~jacent to tho ~roposed police/fire training facility, declared a potential conflict of interest relative to the portion of the E~e~=ive seszion discussion regarding the condition, acquisition and usu cf r~ai property ~or ~ublic sive Co~flict of Interest Act and state~ he would leave the Executive Session at =he time the subject was brought up for discussion. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Maye$, the Boar~ went into ~xeeutivo Session, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a)13) o~ the Code of Virginia. 1950, ~s amended, ~o ~iacu~s tho condition, acquisition and u~e of real property for public purpose~ for a polioo/iir~ training ce~te~ a~ m~hoo] ~aoilities. vote: Unanimous Mr. Currin exsused himself fIom the Executive Session prior to diucussioa r~g~rdinq the condition, acquisition a~d usu ~f real property for public purposes for a police/fire training On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by MI. Applegata, the Board adopted the following ~OSOlUtion pursuant to Section ~.1-344 (a)I~) of the code of virginia, l~SO, as amended, regarding the di~e%ssion ~ the condition, acquisition an~ ~se of real property fo/ p~01ic purposes for school facilities: WHE~k~As, =h~ ~card o~ Supervisors has thi~ day adjourned into Executive ~emmion in accordance with ~ formal vo~e of the ~oard. and in accordance with the prcvlslon~ of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and ~S, the Virginia Freedom of I~0~a~ion Act ~ff~otive July l, 1989, provides for certification that such NOW, TK~FO~, BE IT ~OLVED that the Board of Co~ty me~er'~ ka~ludge, i) only 9~lic businesm matters lawfully exempted from open me,ting rear,eats ~der the Fre~om of which thia certificatic~ ~ppli~u, and ii) only au=h 9~1io Executive Session was convened were hoard, ~iscussed or ~on~i~z~ by ~hu Board. NO m~r dissents from t~s certification. Th~ Board being polled, the vote WaS =s follows: Mr. Daniel: A~ Mr. Mayes~ A~e. Mr. Applega=e: Aye. Mr. Sullivan: Aye. Ns. Currin excus~ h~self fr~ the meeting. 90-933 i2/12/90 On motion cf Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board adopted the following resolution pursuant to Section 2.1-344 Ia)(3) of th~ Code of Virqinia, 1950, as amended, regardimg the discussion of the condition, acquisition and use of real Drepert~ ~sr public p~rposes for a police/fire training W}L~qEAS, the Board of Supervisor~ has this day adjourned Board, and in accordance with th~ provision~ o~ the Vir~ini& W~F~aEAS, the Virqinla F~eedom of in~ormatio~ Act 9ffective July 1, 1989, provides for certlfi0aticn that such F~xeeutive Session was conducted in confo~ity with law. ~0~4, T~K~EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of each member's knowledge, i) only public busi~es~ matters lawfully Infurmation AOt were discussed in the Executive Session to which this =~rtifioation applies, and ii) only ~uch public business matters as were identifi~ in the ~o=ion by w~ioh the considered b~ the Board. No m~ber diss~n~ from this c~rti~icatio~. The Boar~ being ~olled, th~ vote was aa ~ollows: Mr. Daniel: Aye. ~r, Ap~legate: Aye. ~r. Ceftin: Absent. i1.H. LUNCH Th~ Beard r~¢essed ut 1:~ p.m. (E~T) to travel to Magnolia Gran~ for lunch. ll.I. ~EQ~ST$ FOR~O~II~E~C~NTTSA~DRSZONi~G 90SN0311 In Midlothian ~agi~t~rial District, DASD JO~ re~ested a thirty (30) day deferral of a mobile home De,it to park a mobile home in a Residential (R-7~ District. The density of ~i~ property is located aDp~ox~ately 275 fee~ off the south line of Ra~Iroad Avenue, ~rom a point approx~a~ly 140 feet east of TOWer Light Roa~, in the vicinity of 1468 Railroa~ Avenue. Tax Map 15-7 (1} Parcel 60 (Sheet 7). ~. Jacobsen stated the applic~t is re~stin~ a deferral of his ~pplication ~til J~uarF 23, 1990. Mr. David Jones stated a deferral was de~ired. a~ he felt there was an ~Xis=iag, ~ctional septic syst~ a~d well on th~ s~ject property, therefore, the a~pliean~ should 90-934 1]/12/90 be permitted to use the existing septic sMstem and well facilities on the subject property a~d not be required to comply with the c~rrent septic ay~tam and walt policy. O~ motion of Mx. Sullivan, seconded by M~. A~lCgate, tho Board deferred Case 905N0311 until Janl~ar¥ 23, 199[. Vote: Unanimou~ 89SN0422 (Amended} In Clover HiLl Magisterial District, Ji~HES ~%~SBA~D requested parkin~ exceptions. Th~ densiCy o~ suck ~n~n~ wil~ Oo~%rol~ed by zoning conditions or Ordin~ce st~rds. ~e Compr~hanslve Plan d~si~t~s the ~rop~rty for Ii,bt i~dus%~ial u~e wi~h density ~o be demeaned by development District on a 2.3 acra parcel fronting approx~ately 278 feet on the east line o~ Johnston Willis Drive, appro~i~t~ fee~ so~th of Mi~lothian ~rnpike. T~ Map 17-10 (1) Parcel 32 and Part of Parcel 29 (sheet the Pl~ninq c~ission race--ended approval, s~jeHt Currin s~at~d Ca~ BPSN0422 would ~e placa~ in its 90~N0146 In Na~oaca ~is~erial District, IPX~NB~LID~E P~OpEP~Im~ II, L.P. re~este~ rezoning from Office Business (0) of 1.0 acra, Multi-f~ly RaPid.ri:iai (R-~) oS 1.9 acres, and Li~h~ Industrial (M-l) of 3.5 acres, to Co~ity Businass (C-3). designates ~e property for remidential use of 4.01 to 7.00 ~itm per acre. Thi= re~st tie~ on m total o~ S.4 acres fronting in two (2} pla~es for a ~otal of aDDrox~atety 215 Chalkley Read. T~ Map 114-10 {1) Part of Parcel 9 ~. Currin disclosed to the Board that he o~s property adjacent to the s~ject site, declared a conflict of interest p~suant %o :he virginia Comprehensive Con~lic~ of Act and excused Himself from the meeting. =h~ Planni~ co~ission x~oo~end~ approval ~d acceptance the applicant's pro,fared conditions. Mr. Charles Cabell, representing the applic~t, state~ the reoo~ndation was aooept~l~. ~re was no opposition application being handled a~inistratively. Mr. Jacobsen stated the r~est was iora rezoni~g which re~ir~ that ~oard approval be obtained. on motion o~ Mr. Mayas, ~econded ~ ~r. Applegate, the Boar~ 90-935 12/12/90 1. The Property shall be serviced by public water and newer. 2. within the areas of the Property to be zoned C-S, uses permitted will be limited to those uses and restricted iH the C-~ District except the following uses shall not be permitted: a. Wholesale building material sales yards, not associated with a retail house ~nd garden canter. b. Cocktail lounges, dininU halls and nightclubs, but not including sit-down restaurants or cafeterias. c. Contractor's ~hop a~d Storage yard. d, Drive-in ~tabllshments, but n~t retail establlshment~ with drive-up window~ associated With restaurants whiuh have i~tsriur dining facilities, financial institutions, dry cleaner~, and laundries. not incidental to o=her ~stail sales. No hotel shall be permitted on the Property unless the north/south freeway re£err~d to in ~roffer 4 of Cas~ 89SN01LU is censtruoted. g. o£~ice-waraheuses when the warehouse area does nut exceed twenty-fflve thousand fee=. h. Motor vehicle sales, service and repair establishments. i. Indoor recreational establishments such as pool halls aa~ video parlors, but not health club~ or ~itne~s centers. ~, Motor vehicle wash. Within the Property. th~ following development standaxds will be followed~ a. There shall be no external speaker EyEte~ located on the Property which is loud enough tn ~e heard residents in residential areas adjacent to the ~roperty. b. The retail huniness hours applicable to the Property shall be between 6:00 a.m. and 11:~ p.m., any none-£ast foo~ sit-down restaurant that doan not have a drive-in window may hau~ Ietail he,rs ~etween 5:00 a.m. and 2;00 a.m. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Daniel and Mr. 90SNO285 In Bermuda Magisterial District, A.T. LAY~ requested rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Gsneral Busines~ (C-5). ~he densit~ of such an~ndm~nt wilt be eontrelle~ by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for general commercial use with density to be determined b~ development regulations. This request lie~ on a 0.2~ acre parcel £ronti~g approximately 75 feet on the north line of Willis Road, approximately 500 feet west of Pams Avenue. Tax Map 81-S Ii) ~arcel 11 (Sheet 23]. 12112/90 Mr. Jacobsen presented a summary of Case 90SN0285 and stated the Planning Commission r~commended apprueal ~nd acceptance of the appl±cant'~ pr©florid condition. Mr. A. T. La!me etat~d the recommend&rich was acoeptabls. There was no opposition present. ce motion o~ Mr. Curr±n~ seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the approved Case 905~02~ and ~ceepted the ~ullowlng proffered condition~ Prior to the issuance of a buildin~ perm/t, forty-five (45} feet ~f right-of-way On north side of Willis Road, measured fro~ o~nt~zlinu of shat 9art of Willis Road i~ediately adjacent to the prop~r~y, ~hall be dedicate, ~r~e and ~estricted, to ~d In Clover Rill Ma~i~te£ial District, ~,~. WAI/~O~, GL~N M. HIL~ requested rezoning ~rom Agricultural (A) to bz controlled by zoning conditio~ or Ordinate ~tandards. The Comprehensive ~1~ de$ign=~ ~hu proDexty for residential us~ o~ 1.~1 to 4.00 units per acre with d~sity to 3.6 acr~ ~arcel fronting approx~at~ly 560 fe~t on ~he north w~n=erpock Road. T~ Map 75-2 (i) ~r=els ] and 4 (Shee~ 20). Mr. Jacobso~ ~r~untud a s~ry of Ca~e 90SN0288 a~ stated the ~lanning collusion ~co~n~e~ approval of ~he and acceptance of the applicant's proffered condition. Mr. ADDlegat~ utatud he wished to ~scus$ this re.est. Curtis stated Case 90SN0288 wo~ld De placed in its ~e~lar ~e~c~cu on the agen~ for discussion. In Dale Magisterial District, CHES"~ERFT~.~ CO~ p~ C~4I$$ION requested amendment ~ conditional Use Planned Development (Case ~7S038) r~lativ~ to the t~e l~itation for office =se in an Agricultural (A) District. The density of ~uoh ~en~en= will be controlled by zoning conditions or property for residential ~uu c~ 6,01 to 7.00 ~iUs per asre with densiuy ~o be d~te~iaed by ~evelo~ant repletions. ~is re~e~t lieu on a 1.64 a=re parcel fronting a~rox~ately 1~4 feet on ~he eau= lins o~ Iron Bridge Road, approx~ately 240 ~eet north of Kingsland Road. T~ Map 66-13 (1~ Paroel 7 ~. Jacob$o~ presented a s~a~ cf Case 90~N0310 and stated the Plying Co~$$ion reco~ende~ approval, s~ject to certain conditions. MI. Eon ~eeler, the pro~arty ~er, state~ the reco~en~e~ conditiOnS wPr~ accept~le. When asked, Mr. Jacobso~ stated ~en~ent oi Condition 3 will all~ the office use to continue u~til such =~e that the adjacent propeEty iu rezoned or redevelop~ and that the zoning runs with the land. On motion of ~. D~iel, seconded by ~. ~ayes, the Board approved Ca=~ 9OEN0310, s~ject to the ~cll~ing condition: 90-937 11/12/90 At such time that adjacent property to the north and/or south is rezoned for residential, office, er commercial and conmtruc~icn commences on such Develepment may continue, for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of approval of the building permit for the adjacent construction. [NOT~: At such time this condition takes effect, shoul~ %~he applicant wish to continue profemmional office uss of the property, it will be necessary to this condition or rezone the r~uest pzoper~y to an appropriate classification and develop it in accordance with Zoning ordinance standards.) Vote: Unanimous In Clover Hill Maginterial Dimtr~ct, J~$ ~A~D amendment to Conditional Use Planned Developments (cases 8~$024 a~d 8~SN0082) to pe~i~ an ~ulance service ~arking exceptions. The density of such ~en~ent will controlled b~ zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. repletions. This re.eat lies in a Light Industrial District on a 2.3 acr~ parcel fronting approximately 278 feet o~ the east line of Johnston Willis Drive, approx~ately 1~130 feet south of Midlothian Turnpike. Tax MaD t7-10 (1] Paros1 the Pla~ing Co.lesion reco~ended approval, s~ject to certain conditions. acteptable. There was no opposition present. Mr. Applegate raised questions relative to operation of the ~ulan=~ service without an approved zoning. Mr. Jacobsen stated that staff was following routln~ proced~ and allowing the operation to continue Dendlnq the outcome ~ thi~ zoning ~or th~ re~eatad u~ and an approved ~l~ce petit ~it~. He further stated the pro~rty o~e~ had not contacted his olli~e regarding obtainin~ a~ ~ul~oe De.it. Hubbard indicated th~ re~t~d u~ wa~ to prcvid~ ~ulanc~ 9-1-1 ~er~e~cie~. Whe~ asked. Chief Dolezal indicate~ area rescue s~ads had no objection to the ~roDosed re.est as long as the ~ervice did not provide emergency tr~por~. ADDle~ate ststed he ~elt th~ re.est mhould be d~erred the r~e~t~ zo~i~q ~en~ent. He also asked tha~ ~bard ask the owner to acc~Dany h~ to the meeting. H~bard in.cared he would do On motion of Mr. ApDle~ate, second~ by ~. Daniel, the Board deferred Case 89SN0421 until Janua~ 23, %991. 90-938 12/12/9~ In Clover Hill ~agi~terial District, G.~. WALE~0p, III AND GLENN M. HILL requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (C-3). The density of such amendment will he controlled by sonin9 cunditiuns ur Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan designates =he property for residential uae of 1.51 to 4.80 units per acre .with ~e~sity to be de~ermine~ by ~evelepment regulations. This request lies on a 3.6 acre parcel fronting approxlmately 560 feeU on the north line o~ ~ull Street Read~ approximately 275 feat east of Winterpock Roa~- Tax ~ap 75-2 (1) Parcels 3 and 4 (Sheet 20). ~I. Andy $cherzer, representing the applicant, stated the Dissent. Mr. Applegate noted there was a wide range of and questioned the various uses proposed by this request. Mr. Sch~rzer stated his client submitted application for rezoning since the adjoining and/or adjacent properties already have apprcve~ rezonings but he ourrentlw has no specific uses in ~ind. Mr. ~cOracken ~tated the applicant's pro~£ered road imrProve, me~ are ~ufficient. on motion of Mr. Appl~gate, seconded~¥ Mr. Daniel, the Board approved Case 90SN§288 and accepted the following proffered conditions: d. Cocktail lounges a_~d ui~htclubs. f. Zl~ctrical, plum~i~ cz heating Supply sales, ~ervice amd related clisplsy rooms. g. Fee~, ~eed, ae~ i~e sales. t. Shopping centers provided ~hat they are limited to maximum of twenty-five (25) acres per project. w. Veterinary hospitals a~d/ur commercial kennels (w/no outsi~e runs). NOT~: All other permitted or restricted C-3 use~ 2. ~rior ~o issuance of a buildin~ pe~mit, 100 f~et of right cenuerline of that par= o~ Route 3~0 immediately adjacent to th~ ~reperty, ~hall be dedisate~, fr~u and unrestricted, to and ~er the benefit of Chesterfield 3. Direct access to Route 360 shall bo limited to one ennrance/exit. The location of this acc~xs shall be 4. ~rior to the issuance of any oscupancy permlt~, £oz the entire property ~rontage to provide an a~ditional 'through-lane (i.e., third through-lane) pluza right-turn 90-939 ~1112190 Prior to obtaining a Building permit, one of the following shall be accomplished for fare protection: a. For buil4ing permits obtained on or before June 30, 1991, the ~wner/developer shall pay tc the County $~50.00 per 1000 square feet of gross ~lour area. If the building permit is obtained after J%lne 30, 1991, the amount of the required payment shall adjusted upward or de%rnward by the sA.~e percentage that the Marshall swift Building Cost Index increased or decreased between June ~O, 1991 and the date ~6f payment. With the approval of the ~ir~ Chief, th= owaer/de~elePer shall receive a credit toward the required pa!rment for the cost of by law which is included as a part of the h. The owner/developer shall p~evide a fire system not otherwise required by law which the County's Fire Chief determinem aubetantlally the n~ed for County facilities otherwi=e for the pre~ection. 90SN028~ In Matoaca Magisterial bi=~=ict, MIDD0~BZAN E~'£zy~ISES, INC. re~e~ted ~en~ent to Conditional Us~ Pla~ed Development (Ca~e 86S08Q) relative to ho~s of opera, ion, lighting, ~i~s ~nd the provision of locked security gates. The density of suoh ~en~nt will b~ con. oiled by zonin~ con. riots or Ordinan~ ~t~dards. The C~pr~$nsive Pi~ d~signates th~ acre parcel fronting on the south line of Waterfowl Ft~ay, else fronting approx~at~ly 650 fe~t on th~ ~ast l~ne Woodland Pond Parkway~ ~d located in the southeast ~adrant Parcel 3 ~d Tax Map 112 (1) P~t of Parcel 5 (Sheet the ~la~in~ C~ission reoo~en~ed approval, s~jeo~ certain conditions. Ke noted area residents had e~ressed tone.rna relative to insufficient bu~ers between the courts an~ single f~ily ~esi~ential dwellinqs ~o preclud~ noise pollution and l~ght Kr. J~e= Schnell, representing ~e a~lic~t, stated the rec~ended conditions w~r~ Pla~in~ Co~i~io~'~ reco~endation ~or approval of the re.est, 9articularly the conditions regardin~ ho~s of operation and exterior lighting. ~. Jo~ Torrence also indicated sup~rt ~or the re~st provided th~ ~xterlor light~ were shielded aad did not intrude in~o his home. ~. Bea~l~s ~r~ss~ concerns that appreval of the re.est would s~t a precedent as it would est~lish that aberr~t lighting must be dealt with by zoninq. ~. So.eli reco~ended by the Plying Co~isslon. On motion of ME. Mayes, second~ by Mr. Applegate, ~e Board 1. Hours of operation shall be l~ted to B~0O a.m. to p.m., h~wever, activities ¢on~otgd e~olu~ively wi~in 90-940 12/12/90 the clubhouse facility shall be permitted until %2 midnight. (P) (N~T~: ~his condition amends and supersedee condition 2 2. Nc tennis courts shall be illuminated after 9:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and nc later than ll:OO p.m., 3. All exterior lights shall De arranged an~ installed so that the direct or reflected illumination does not ~Gee~ 0.5 ~oo~ candles above background measured at the lot line of any adjoining resident%al par0el. Light standards shall De o~ a diroctional-t~pa capable of shielding the light $o~ree from direct view from aR¥ adjoining parcel or public right of way. With the exception of s~urity lighting, ac on, side li~htin~ shall be illuminated after 12:00 midnight. (P) (NO~: This condition amends and supersedem Condition 6 of case 06S080.) 4. Ail signs shall eo~ply with Sections 21.1-266 ~d 21.1-267 of the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance. [NOTE: This condition ~upersedes Condition 7 of Care 86S080,) 5. A maximum of six (6] swi~ msst~ shall be permitted during any one (1) calendar year subject, however, to the limitaticn~ Of Condition i ~bove and condition 5 (case 86s080). (P) (NOTE: All other previously imposed conditions of Ca~e In Dale Magisterial District, W.$. CARNES requested rezoning from A~rieultural (A) and Residential (R-7] to Townhouse Renid~ntial (R-T~) with Conditional Use Plar~e~ Development tc permit use and bulk exceptions. Residential use of up to eight (0) u_~its per acre is permitted in a Tow~house Residential (R-~) District. Th~ density of such will be con, rolled ~y zoning conditions or Ordinance standard~. The Comprehensive Pi~ designates the propert~ for remidenuial uss of 1.51 to 4,00 unit~ pe~ acre with density be dctu~ined by d~velo~nt re~lations. T~S ~e~est liu~ on a 48,4 acre parcel ~ronting a~ro~ately 1,4~0 feet on the east lin~ of Iron Bridge Road, across from We~t ~ock S~ring Drive and Co~try ~nor Lane; also ~rontLnq approxi~tuly 380 feet on the north line of Cogbill Roa~, approx~ataly 640 west of K~dle~ton Avenue, and lying at the w~stern te~ini Marry Boulevard a~d St~ley Drive. T~ ~p 52-10 (~) P~c~ls 5 and 7 (sheet 15). ~r. Jacebson presented a st~x~a~y ef Case 90SN0289 and stated the ?lanning Commission recommended approval, subject to the Textual Statement, as amund~d. Ee noted staff recommended denial of the request as the applicant has been unwilling to commit to full participation in the capital faoility/in£ra- structure improvements as prescribed by the Board's cash proffer policy and without s~ch a ccrmnitment, the burden of providing tho capital facility/infrastructure improvements required as a result Of ~he proposed dev~lopmen~ will have to be borne Dy ~ounty taxpayers. 90-941 12112/90 ~r, John c0gbill, representing the applicant, presented an overview of the proposed project; re£erenced a techniual change in the Textual Statement as agreed upon between the applicant a~d the Utilities D~partment; stated the applicant's position aa the ~equusted r~zoning; and asked that he be permitted rebuttal to opposing remarks. ~r. Vernon Williams, Mr. Oscar Cum~erlower Ms. Meg Donovan, Mr. John Marshall and ~r. Gregory ~xPressed concerns relative to potential drainage and water pollution pr0blums, the density of the project, pIopased co~ercial uses, restriotions on retail/co~er0ial development in th~ area; increased ~raffic generation; enforcement of the cash proffer etc. Discussion, ~p/estions and comments ensued relativ~ to what Drossy%ions have ~een taken to ensure appropriate drainage control; proposed uses and compatibility with the Central Area Plan and the surrounding area; etc. Mr. W. S. Carnes came forward and ~tated there were no existing drainag~ problem~ on the subject property and that the request wonl~ h~ b~n~ficial to the County. Mr. cogbill exhibite~ a rendering displayin~ the %!rpe home to be ear, treated in the proposed develo~ent and addressed concerns expressed by the oD~osition, indicating the applicant has maas every effort to resolve those concerns~ and sta[~ hi~ client felt ~hat his prof£e/sd con~itions, including his proposed cash pa~ent, were reasonable. There was ~urther discussion relative to ~he impae~ of proposed d~veto~nt on area roads, schools, and othez infrastructure requlrement~; Mr. Currin brought the mar=er before the Board. proposed reqllest; privat~ road ownership and the responsibility for maintenance ~f same: enforceability of lJ-~itation for th~ proposed ~etirement community; draiDAge road imDruvement controls; quality and compatibility; rational relationship between infrastructure needs and project; utc. Mr. Daniel m~de a motion, seconded by M~. Applega~e, to approve Case 90SN0289, sub3ect to the ~ollowing conditions: 1. The followin~ conditions notwithstanding, the Textual Statement (dated Nov~mber 29, 1990, revised Dscemtber 10, 19901 a~d the Conceptual Pla~, p~epurud by Earl ~wans~on, Architect, =i~led "Land Use Co~cept, A Cartes Development for Chesterfield County, Virginia," dated September 15, 1990, shall be ~he Master Plan. Approval c~ the Master Plan does not imply that the County giv~ fi~al approval of any 9artlcular road alignment or t~ical ~ection. 2. Prior to any site plan or final cheek plan approval, a plan that insures the contint%al maintenance o~ the private roads shall be su~mltted to, and approved by, the Transportation Department. 0nly one (1) access e~ch shall be provided ts Route 10 and Cogbill Road. (NfY~E: This condition a~ndu a_~d 4.25~C o~ the Textual Statei~ent.) Vote: Unanimous supersedes Sec%ion Mr. Apple~afe requested that staff schedule a work session to di~eu~ Cash pruffers at ~he Janlu~ 9, 1991 meeting. ~r. Daniel zequested s~aff ~o prepare a resolution requesting signalization at Reck Spring Drive and Route 10. 12/12/90 90~N0295 In Midlotkian Megiuterial District, P~NCE NISSAN rsc/~ested amendment ts Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 86S122) relative to signs. The densit~ cf s~¢h amonclment will be co~trolled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The commercial use with density to be determined by development reg~lations. This request lies in a Ccmmuni=y ~usinees (B-2) District un two (2) parcels totalling approximately 15.5 acres feet on the south line of Midtothlan Turnpike, also fronting a~proxima=ely 6QQ feet on the west line of Murray Olds Drive, and approxlmatel¥ 500 feet ¢~ the east llne of ~urray olds Drive, and located in the southeast and southwest quadr~ts of the intersection of the~o roads. Ta~ Map 16-12 (1) ~arcels 56 and 57 (Sheet 7). ~lanning commission recommended denial e~ the reguest to permit increased sign area fei all si~$; approval o~ the amendmeAt to allow staff apDrovat of sign packages and location; and approval to De!mit a larger frnestand~ng sign, subject to certain conditieR$, Mr. ~tanney Boyce, ~eprese~ting the applicant, pre~ented a dealership currently exists on a pcr~ic~ of the request property and the al~plicant desires to eXpand the existing busineSS to inolude an additional dealership ~o include the entire request acreage; and requested favorable consideration cf ~he request. histor~ o~ sign requirements on the subject property; the applicant's request to amend the Conditional Use Planned Development to permit signage that varies from the approved color, deslgn, location and ~ize; expansion of the existin~ facility to include a second dealership and appropriate advertising for the individual dealerships; the criteria of the "old" Zoning 0r~inanoe versus the criteria of the "n~w" Zonin~ ordinance; Special Sign Districts; the current square footage permitted on the Bite exceeding that permitted by both zoning ordinances; etc. ~r. soyce ~tated th~ re.est as originally submitted was actually fQz a total of 650 square ~eet of sign area, not 628.5 square feet; that his client i~ willing to reduce the size of zignags in other locations in order to obtain approval to per~it One (1} Nissan product $ig~ on the site; a~d noted that all other sigBs oem~ly with the local ordinance and/or conditions imposed upon the development. There was ne opposition present. Mr. Sullivan stated he u~derstood the applies/It's concerns, however, approval e~ the subject request could ~stablish a precedent for other dealerships to seek additional sign area; that he felt the existing signu~a was sufficient to fAentify the dealership and the applicant would have to work within the framewor~ permitted; and ~tated he supported t%e staf~ a~d Planning Commission recommendation. Mr. Sullivan mad= a motion, seconded by~r. Daniel, for denial of the request to permit increased sign area for all signs: approval o~ the amendment to allow ~taff approval of sign packages; approval of the amendment r~lative to sign numbers, color, desig~ a~d location: and approval of a larger free, tending sign, s~bjec~ to certai~ conditions= 90-945 12/12/90 The numar, color, design and location of signs shall be as regulated by the zoning Ordinance. Further, the Bize and heigh~ of directional ~igns shall be as regulated by the zoning Ordinance. (P) (NOTE: This condition supersedes Condition 2 (a) and 2 2. Sign packages, in accordance with conditions of zuning, may k~ approved by the planning Department. (NCT~: This condition supersedes Condition 2 (d) of daze 86S122.) 3. The aggregate area o~ all signs shall not exceed 602 ~quara feet. Further, a m~ximum of three (3) freestanding signs shall be permitted: two (2] located west of Murray olds Drive, not to exceed an aggregate ~urray 01ds Drive, not to excae~ an aggregate area of fifty (50) square feet. with the exceptiua of one (1) freeetanding ~i~n having a heigh= of thirty-one I31) feet, all other freestanding signs shall not exceed u height of thirty (30) feet. (NOTE: This condition supersedes Condition 2 (b} of Case 865122.) There was further Board discussion relative to permit si~age that vari~ from the approved ~olor, ~esign, location and size; etc. Mr. Applegate expressed concern that the County b~in~n~es~ ability to advertise their products. Mr. Daniel stated o=her automobile dealerships Ln the county have a~tempted to work within the g~idelines o~ the recently adopted "new" Zoning Ordlnan~e te provide c~uality advertising ior their ~usines~es and stated he Could support the request if the applicant's rec/~est did not exceed the square ~ootage eziginali¥ permitted Mu=ray Oldsmobile. Mr. Beyce requested permission to read,ross the Board. ~r. Currin stated the public heuring Wa~ closed and the matter was before ~he Board. Mr. Sullivan restated his motion, ~eeonded by Mr. Daniel for denial of the request to permit increased sig~ area for all sig~=; approval of thc a~e~(~m~t to allow staff a~roval c~ mign paekagmg; approval of the am~n~unent relative fo sign nunfoers~ color, design and location; and ~p~roval of a larger The number, color, design a~d location of signs shall be as regulated by the Zoning Ordinance. F~ther, the size the Zoning Ordinance. (P) (NOTE: This condition superm~d~s Condition 2 {a) and 2 (c) of Case 86s122.) 2. Si~n packages, in accordance with conditions e~ zoning, may be approved by the Planning Dep~rtment. (~orE: This condition supersedes Co~d£tion 2 (d) of Case 86S122.) 3. T~e aggregate area of all signs s~ll not exceed 602 square feet. Further, a maximum e~ three (3) freestanding signs shall be permittpd.:'J:'t~o ~2~ ~ocatp~ west of M~rray Olds Drive, ~ot te~ exoe~ an aggregate ar~a of 250 square feet, and one (1) located east of 90-944 12/12/90 Murray Olds Drive, not to exceed an aggregate area of ~i~ty (~0J square ~eet. With the exception of one (1) ~reestanding ~ign having a height of thirty-o~e (31) fe~t, all uthe£ freeztanding signs shall no~ exceed a height of thirty (30) fe~t. (NOT~: This condition supersedes Condition I (b) o~ Case 86s122.] Ayes: Mr. Currin~ Mr. Sull~van~ Mr, Daniel a~d Mr. ~ayus. ~ays: ~Lr. Applegate, Mr. Currin expressed hie appreciation to staff for their assistance d~ring his ~enure as chairman of the Board for the previous year. 12. AI)JOURI~r On motion of Mr. Da~ie!, ~ec0~d~d b~ ~lr. Sullivan, the Beard adjourned at §~00 p.m. (~ST] u~ti~ 2:00 p.m. on January 1991. Vote: Unanimous L~n% B. Ramsay ' / county Ad~inist~ator~ Chairman 90-945 ~2/12/90