Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
04-11-90 Minutes
Mr. C. F. Ce=tin, Jr., Chairman Mr. M. B. Sullivane Vic~ Chairman Mr. tarry G. Dan£~l Mr. Lan~ B, Ramsay County Administrato~ Staff in Attendanee= Ms. Anne Cochrane, Asst. to Co. Admin. Mrs. Doris DeHart, Assr, Co. Admin., Le~is. Sve~. and In~ezgovern. Agfairs Mr. William Diqgs, Real MS. ~oan Dolezal, Cler~ to ~he Soar~ Chief Robert Hanes, Fire Department Mr, Bradford S. Hammer, Deputy Co. Admin., Management ~ervices Mr. William ~. Howell, Mr. Thomas E. Jacobsen, Dir, of Planning .Ms. Mary Leu Lyle, Dir. of Accounting MC. Robert Masdent Deputy Co, Admin., Human Services Mr. R. J. MoC~aOken, ~ransp. Direebor Mr. Richard MeElfish, Dir. of ~nv. ~ng. Nfs. M. Arlins McGuire, Treasurer's Office Mr. Gary McLaren, Dir. of Economic Developmt. Attorney Mrs. Pauline Mitchell, Dir. O~ ~ews/Info. Services Sheziff W, J. Minton,' Sheriff's Department D~. William Nelson, Dir.~ 5~alHh D&pt. Mr. F. O. Parks, Pit., Info. 9ys. Teeh. Col.,Joeeph Pittman, Chief of Fcllce ~r. Richard sale, D~puty Ho. Admin., Development Mr. Jay Ste!¥maier, Dir. of Parks & Rec. Dr. Robert Wagenkneoht, Dir. of Librarie~ Mr. David Wslchcns, Dir. cf Utilities Mr. Frederick Willis, Dir. cf ~uman 90-315 4/11/90 Mr. C~rrin called thc meeting to order at 2~5 p.m. [DST) in the Administration Building Conference Room IRoom S02). Mr. R~msey stated th~ purpose o~ the work session was to discuss the General Fund Operating Budget end Capital Improvement Program, Utilities Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program, Nursing Home and Airport. 1. WOrK SE~SIO~ - DUDGET ~ENERALFUNDOP~ATING ~r. ~egmaier pre~e~ted a ~ary relating to the FY90-91 budget including additional issues r~lative tO and/or expenditur~ regarding the landfill design, the Diamond Capital Re,est, 9-1-1 ~rvices~ Juvenil~ Group ~om~ operation; Discussion, questions and co~sn~s ensued ~elative to the Diamond Capital Requese regarding stadium r~ntal, parking concession, admission taxes, other events, expenditures, the County'~ ~ontribBtion as compared to other jurisdictional contrlbu%i~ns and renego%iation of the contract; ~ev~nues and expenditure~ generated monthly for the 9-1-1 service and a proposed five cent in~rea~e to recover anticipated 9-1-1 expenditures; funding of the School System ~ealth Care Deficit iD the ~ount of $812,700 and the E~an Resource/Payroll System: the inclusion of Ettrick in ~h~ proposal; It was gun=rally agreed that information be provid%d to the Board for a briefing on all ~pects of th~ Di~ond's Capital request as discussed; '=hat sta~ review data relative inc~uaue in the surcharge for ]-1-1 serviCe~ and that a copy of the ~ensley/Earrowgate ~roposal be provided %o Mr. proposed FYgl budget as dimcumm~d during ~-21-90 and 3-28-90 work sessions: funding of an additional receptionis~ peel- rico/equipment for %hm new Courtm Building facility and public safeky p0si=ions. Mr. gullivan made ~ motion for approval of the General Fund considered separately. Mr. Sullivan amended his motion tu ap~rove the General Fund sudget, as amended~ for FY91, with the e×usption of tbs Donations expenditures 1565,800). Mr. Applegate ~econded the motion. There was a brief dissuasion regarding the inclusion of the funds and it ~as the general consensus of the Board that these items be included. Vote: Unanimous Discussion, questions and co~unents ensued relative to funding of ~tema as outlined on the Co~unlty contracts Li~t (Donations). After lengthy discnssion~ Messrs. Sullivan and Applegate expreuued concerns relat±v~ to approval of tho contribution to Virginia State University given tho circumstanee~ which transpired last fall; however, Messrs. ~urrin, naniel and ~ayes supported the contribution for FYgl a~ they felt the action~ of a few students should net adversely impact an ~n~ire University scholarship program, that the relationship between the University and County was so~umendable and it was anticipated such c±rsumstances wonld not occur again in the future. 90-316 4/11/90 It was generally agreed to adopt the CO,unity COntracts List, as a~anded, to include a contribution of $25,000 to Virginia State University for the scholarship Program It wa~ generally agreed to recess for ten {10) minute~. Mr. Daniel initiated rediscusslon of the $250,00% funding for the School System Hi, man Resources/Payroll System and requested that it be removed from the County budget and that the School System be hilled for said pay~ant. ~e stated that funding was pruvided for this last year in the Bndqet; that he would like they could not absorb the cost, then the matter could be reviewed apain at an appropriate time to determine what course of action to take. Mr. Sullivan sba%ed this issue was given ~ueh consideration by bo~h the Budget and Audit Committee the School Board Liaison Committee and, after much re~iew~ it wa~ felt that i~ would be appropriate ~e approve the School System's pro rata share of the necessary funding ~rom the General County budge~ be complete the project. Mr. Daniel made a motion to delete the allocation of $250,000 for the School System's Human Re,cures/Payroll System fro~ the propo~d General County Budget and that %he School Administration pay its pro ~ata sheer for the systum~ with the understanding that i~ funds were not available when payment was d~e~ the matte~ WOuld be reconsidered and voted on by the Hoard at that time, There wa~ no Se=Ond. After further ~iscussion, it was on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, resolved to include the $250,000 allocation ~or the School System's Human Resources/Payroll FY91. Ayes~ Mr. Currin, Mr. Sullivan~ Mr, Applegate and Mr. ~ayes. Abstention: Mr. Daniel. ~r. Ramsey stated that revenues would be adjusted to cover this expenditure. Mr. Daniel requested that the Budget be amended Lo reduction of the $4,D00,000 Unappropriated Capital Improv~meata Projects Fund by $800,000 with ~aid funds to be designated for the purchase cf a building ~cr a library site and i£ said building were not purchased, then the $800,000 could he returned to the appropriate fund; and further, requested that the Board go into ~×ecutive Session in order to discuss the acquisition of real property £or public use. On motion of Mr, Sullivan, ~cendeO by ~r. Appl~gate, the Board went into Executive Session to discuss the cendition~ acquisition Or use of real property for public use purmuant to Section 2.1-344(a) (3) cf the Coda of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Reaonvening: 90-317 4711/90 On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by M~. AppIegate, the Bcar~ adopted the following resolution: W~R~AS, the Board of Supervieor~ has this day adjourned into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the · oard, and in accordance with the provisions of th~ Virginia Freedom of Information Actf and WSEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information AC~ effective July 1, 1989, provides for certification that such Executive Session was conducted in conformity with law. Supervi~or~ does hereby certify that to th~ bes~ of each member's knowledge, i] only public business matter~ lawfull~ ~x~pted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of Information Act were discussed in the Executive Session to which thiz cert~flca~ion appliee~ and ii) only such public business matters as w~re identified in the Motion by which the Zxe~utiv~ session was ~onvened were h~ard, discussed or considered by the Board. ~o member dissents from thio certifi- cation. The Board being polled, the vote ~ns a~ follows: Mr. Daniel= Aye. Mr~ ~eyee~ Aye. Mr. Applegate: Aye. Mr. Sullivan= Aye. Mr. Currin: Aye. ~r. Daniel no%ed that~ after further discussion, it was determined that th~ acquisition Of real property for public use a~ di~ouss~d in Executive Session could be achieve~ without a budget amendment. ~_._~.RA~FU~D CAPITAL IMP~OVEMENT~ ~ROGRAM ~r. Stegmeier presented a sttm~ary relae~ng to tko proposed 1991-1995 Capital Impr0vement~ Program. proffer funding ~ouree$; i~adequato revenue ~haring project funding and the inability to complete road project~ thc delaying of completion o~ the Clover ~ill Fir~ Station; whethe~ or not provisions had b~en made to acqair~ ~ighh-of-way for ~hs Mr. Daniel ~¢questud that ae ou~line of the cash proffer plan b~ provided to him and that the Capital Improvements ~rogram begin reflecting, in 1996, plannfog and design expenditure~ fo~ bringing on-line the' new Bensley Fire Station. the meeting. UTILITI~ OF=RATING BUDGET Mr. Stegmaier presented a brief summary of t~e proposed F¥9I Utiliti~ Department Operating Budget, ~ndlcatin~ taste wer~ 99-318 4111190 UTILITIES CAPITAL I_MPROVEME~T PI{OG~Ju~ Discussion, q~¢ution~ and comments ensued r~lative to the extension of public water facillti~s ~o Gleb~ Poin~ water; th~ fact ~at no new subdivision developments word included in future Capital Improvement Pro, rams for the extension of public water after the completion of those projects previously applov~d by =he Board, the la$~ of whi=h being Bellona Arsenal and Winterpock Road; etc. Mr. Eamsey sta~ed that staff anticipated brinqing forward a rpvised ex%eo$ion policy within =he ne~c thirty (~0) days. NDI~SING]{OME Mr. Steq~afer presented a briof s%~mary of the proposed Nursing Nome Fund a~d a brief discussion followed relative to personnel, operating and capital expenditures; reve~e~; rate changos for Intermediate Carl Semi-Private rooms and Skilled Care Se_mi-Private rooms; and anticipatod Capital Improvement Program funding in 1995 for a new Nursing Nome facility. ~IR~ORT Mr. Stegmeier presented a brief suanmary of the proposed County Airport Fund and a brief discussion followed reletive to operating revenues and ~xpenditurss; net income7 rental fees as compared to those of other localities; otc. It wac noted staff would be b~inging forward a feasibility study on the mattor of iesninq revenue bonds for hangar construction in the near future. 2. DI~BT~R Tho Board ~osssoed at ~:~0 Howlett's Tavern for dinner. (DST) to travel to John Mrs. Joan Girone, a for~er Board me,er, led th~ Pledqe of Allegiance to the Flag o~ tho Nnitod States o~ America. 5. A~F~OVi%~ OF S.A. MA~C~ 28, 1990 On motio~ of Mr. Applegate, seeonde~ by M~. Sullivan, the ~o~r~ approved tho minutes cf March 28, 1990~ ak amended. 90-319 4/11/90 Ayes: Mr. C~rin, Mr, S~lli~an, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Daniel. Abgtention: Mr. Mayeg, a~ ha was a~en~ at the conclusion of the meeting. 5.B. ~A~C~ ~.9.,.~9~0. 0n motion o~ Xr. Applegate, sescnded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved the minntes of March 29, I990, ~' ~ubmitted. Vote~ Unanimous §.C. A~L 3, 1990 On motion of Mr. sullivan, ~econded by ~r. Applegate, the Board approved the minutes of April 3, 1990, as submitted. Vot~: Unanimous 6. ~OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S ~XS Mr. Masden rscognised Dr. william R. Nelson, Director Health Department, who was recently e~rtified by the American Boar~ o~ krsventive Me~o{ne aa a specialiat in Public Health and General Preventive Medicine, an~ introduced his wife who was present. He noted such an achievemen~ require~ rigorous study and post graduate work in the specialty area ~eyond ~edicaI Degree. The Board expressed appreoiati0n for hi~ diligent efforts and commende~ Dr. Nelson for his outstanding accomplishments. 7. BOARD COMMITTEE ~r. Daniel r~ported he attended an emergency Capital Region Airport Co~iseion (C~AC) meeting at which %he r~financlng the 1984 Airport Bond was di~eu~$~4 as the interest rate is currently such ~hat aDproximately $12.4 million could be saved spanning ~h~ li~e of ~e bon~$ ~n~ to which martyr there was ~r. ~ayes reported h~ a~tended meetings of the Tri-Ci=ies Metropolitan Plannin~ 0rg~nization (MPO}; th~ Crater Planning District co--lesion Beard of Directors; Crater District Con~i~ion ~xec~tive Co~i%te=; and the groundbreaking ceremony for the new middle school on Bailey Bridg~ Dev~lo~ent COUucil (~EDC) me~ting at which the reaignation of which ther~ has been an active intsrvlewing proces~ in ~ffort to fill the vacancy by July 1, 1990. ~r. Sullivan reported he attended th~ School Board Liaison Co~ittee meeting a% which there w~r~ discussions regarding b~dq~t shortfalls, which issue was al~o discussed durin~ the Board's work sessio~ earlier in ~he afternoon and which he felt wa~ resolved satisfactorily; and as a re~ult of which a of those gite~ that were rejected for the p~0p0sed Northern ar~a h~g~ school was requ=sted for r~-revi~w with ~aid s~ated he felt such meetings continue~ ~o bs business-like and cordial. N~. Currin repoft~4 h~ attended the Appomattox Basin Industrial DeveloDment Corporation (ABIDCO) meeting; the ground~reaking ceremony for the middle ~chool 0n Bailey ~ri~e Road; were bensflcial and productive; and stat%d, earlieN in a~terncon~ he, at the request of Dr, Duborah Cole~ of Virginia 90-320 4/~1/90 Commonwealth University's School of Bu~ine~e~ presented a ~peech and received projects fram Dr. Cole's students pertaining ~o recycling, which ~eports he stated would be forwarded to the Recycling Committee for their perusal. 8. R.~U~STH TO POSTP(~E ACTION, ~ENC~ ~)DITION$ OR On motion of Mr. kpplegate, seconded by Mr. ~eyas, the Board, at th~ request o~ the ~evelop~r~ Mr+ J. ~ark Sowers, withdrew from the agenda Item ll.A.I., Utilities Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a P~rmanent Buffer strip in Brigkton Green Subdivision, Section 14~ reoeived an amended copy of Item ll.E., Consider Amendments to Section 5-22 of the County Coda Relating TO DOg License Fees; deferred, respectively, Items 9.E., R~olution Recognizing ~$. ~usan Hatcher, Fourth Time Winner of the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race, and 9.F., R~olution ReeogDizing Allied Fibers for SDonsorship of Lecture by Ms. Susan Butcher, until 5ach ti~e as ~s. Butcher could arriv~ at the meeting; moved out of sequence Item 13.B., Set Date for Public Hearing to Amend Article XI of Chapter 20 by Rspeallng ~ectlon 20-199 of the Code of the Ceunty, of Chesterfield, 197S, as Amended, Relatiag to Annual ~e~, £o b~ he,rd i~edi~tely following Item 1O~ and adopted th~ agenda, as a~anded. Vote~ Unanimous It was noted there was no public ob)action to the'~ithdrawal of Item ll.A.i., ~tilities Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Gr~n Subdivision, ~ectlon 14, from the agenda. 9. ~SOL~IONS ~ SPECI~ 9.A. MIDLOTHI~/~ ~UTIFT~.,~N C0~ll'l'~E FOR T~IR ACCO~PLIS~]~NTS 0n motion of the Board, ~e following re~olution was WH~R~S, Through the interest and support of member~ the Chesterfield Bu~in~ C~uncil; private citizens; area business lead,rs; representa=ives of the Virginia DaDartment of Tra~s~ortatio~ a~ m~be~s oi tho Chesterfield County govern- men:, ~he ~idlothian Beautifi~aeion Committee ha~ raised in exce~s of $184,000 to beautify a seven-mil~ median strip on ~idlo~ian Turnpike; and WHE~A~, Ail cltlz=ns of Cheaterfield County and %o the co~uni%y will be able t~ enjoy ~ear-round, the greatly enhance the ambience o~ the co~erciaI ar~a between the Ric~ond-chester~ield Border and ~ke Village of Midlothian~ and ~EREA~, The Board of suDerviuors does hureb~ acknowledge =he vision and leadership of sealtor Bernard Savage, Chairman of the Midlothian Beautification Co~ittee, and the following me, ers of kis successful ~r. S%uph~n ~. ~aril M~. Jerry Nr. P~t~ Cleal Mr. Andy Farmer Ns. Joan Girone ~r. John Herr MS. 'Cecelia Lucas Mr, Dennis ~r. Tim Rash The Konorable John C. NOW, THEREFOR~ BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board Of Supervisors does publicly recognize the accomplishments of the Midlothian Beautification Cummlttn~ and express appreciation for the unusual voluntary efforts of the Midlothian Beautification Committee which contributed to Chesterfield's imag~ as a "Firnt Choice County." Vets: Unanimous And further, it wam on motion of th~ hoard that thm following resolution be edep~ed~ WHeReAS, Through r_hu interest and support of member~ of the Chesterfield Buniness Council; prlv~%e ci~i=ens; area busine~ l~ad~rs; r~prese~tatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and members of the Chesterfield County govern- m~nt, th~ ~idlothian Beau~ifiuation Co~ittee has raised in e~cess of SI8~008 to beautify a seven-mil~ median stri9 on Midlothian Turnpike; and WM~AS, All citizens of Chesterfield CountF and visitors to the co,unity will be able to enjoy year-round, the beautl- ful floweriAg trees and evergreen trees which will qr~atly enhance ~he umbi~nc~ of the co~rCi~l area bm~ween th~ Richmond-Chesterfield ~cr~er and the Village of Midlothian; and the public awaran~as activitie~ Of th~ members of th~ Midlo- ~hian Beautification Co~lttee: Mr. Stephen E. Befit Mr. ~eter Cteal Mr. Andy Farmer Ms. Cecelia Luca~ The ~onorab~e John C. watkins ~r. ~ernnrd Savage, Chairman connty Board of Supervi~or~ ~oes publicly recoqn~ze their successful fund-rai~n~ ~fforts; applaud ~he accomplishments of Co~ittee who helped Chesterfield maintain its image a~ a "First Choice County." ~hich contributed to b~au%ifica~ion cf the County's image. 9.B.P. ECOGNIZlNGAPRIL ~2-28~ 1990 AS "VOLUNTEER~tP~RECIATiON On motion of the Board~ the following resolutio~ was adopted: WHE~AS, Volunteering is a way of life in the Un~te4 State~ of A~riua; a~d WHE~AS, Chesterfiel~ County has established an Office of Volunteer Services through which citiz%ns give thousands of hours of service to it~ citizens; and 90-322 4/11/90 WHEREA$~ Th~ citizen volunteers have contribnted slgnlflcent~y to the guality of life in our County, our Co~onwealth and our Country; and WHEREAS, Volunteer~ from every age group and walk of life have enriched the lives of PedDle through both public and private agencies, both formal and informal arrangements. NOW, THE~/~FQRE BE ~T RESOLVED, ~y hhe Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors that April 22 - 28~ 1990 be declared "Volunteer Appreciation Week" in Chesterfield County and urges the public to honor volunteers for their contributions to the well-being of our County and its p~ople. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Currin presented the executed resolution to those volunteers and staff liaisons who w~re present and ~omm~nd~d them for their significant contributions tn thc quality of life in the County. 9.C. ~99~ HTILITI~S DEPAR~ I~_~RCONT~ST 9~INN~P~ Mr. David Welchons, Director of Utilities, 8tated~the Utilities D~par~en~ po~ter conte~t i~ ~ major e4uca~iona~ and public relations event sponsored by the Depar~ent each year in an effort to mid ~%udent$ and their parents in realizing what is involved in producing clean water. ~e stated forty-one pesters were submitted from five of the County's middle s~hools utilizing the theme, "Clean Drinking Water Essential ~or H~alth~ Vital for Dife" and presented the following winners and 8tmdent Oist~iet ~iddle School Mr. Jerumy Lin ~unfro Clover ~ill Swift Creek {First) Miss Katie Elizabeth Duff Midlothian ~idl~thiun {S~cond} {Third) Mr. brian Sheley Miss Ruth McDorman ~r. Chris Andrus Mr. Tony Secha Miss R~b~¢ca Lynn Swift Creek Clover EilI Midlotbian Midlu~hian Swift Creek Swift Creek Midlothian Midlothian The ~oard come, ended those present ~er their concern with the welfsr~ of the environment; for their participation/accomplish- ment ~n the contest; end w~shed them w~ll in their future · .O,1. MR. ROBF, I~ O. On motion of the Board, th~ fcllowin9 resolution was adopted: william D. ~oyce un February 8, 1910; and 90-329 ~/ii/~O WHEREAS, The Boy ~couts of America was founded to promote citizenship training, personal development and fitnes~ of individuals; and WHEREASr After ~arning at least ~wen~y~one msrit badges in a wide variety of fields~ marring in a l~ad~zship position in troop, carrying cut a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the t~OCp, demonstrating Scout spirit and living up to the Sco~t Oath and Law; and WHEREAS, Nr. Robert Ogden HasselI, Redeemer Lutheran Church, Troop 845, has accomplished theme high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle SCOU~ which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering th~ SCOUting movemsnt; an~ WN~R~A~, Growing through his e~perienoe$ in ~couting, learning %he lessons of responsible citim~nmhip ~nd priding himself on the great accompllshme~ts of his County, Robert is indeed a member of a n~w generation oi prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. to Mr. Robert Ogden Eassell an~ acknowledqe~ the good its citizens. and commended hi~ for his outstanding achieve~snt. On me,ion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHeReAS, The Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by ~r. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; W~A~, The Boy Scouts of A~erica wa~ founded to promote citizenship training, personal development and fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, After ~arning a~ lea~ twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields~ serving in a lead~rmhip position troop, currying out a service project beneficial to his co~uni~y, being active in the troop, d~monstrating spirit and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and W~ER~AS, Mr. nonnie Slate, Crater District, Troop 135, hag aecompllshe~ those high gkandards of co~itment add has reauhed the long-sought goal uf ~agle Scou= which is receiv=d by than two percent of %ho~e individual~ entering ~he scouting movement; and WM~AS, Growing ~hrough his experiences in Scanting, l~arn~ng thm lessons of responsible citizenship and priding himself on the gr~mD accomplishments o~ hi~ COunty, Donnle in~eed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens o~ whom we can all be very ~0W, THEREFO~ ~= IT RESOLED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Sup~isors hereby ex,ends it9 congratulations to Mr. Do~nie Slate and acknowledge~ the good fortune of County to have such a~ outstanding young man as one of 411l/9o Mr. Mayas ~eeented the executed resolution to Mr. Slate and cunlmended him for his outstanding achievement. ~i~ Heather Quinlay, 9xa$iden~ of the Ecology club, Nonacan High School~ ~ie$ Bonnie Hstee~ 6th Grade, Providence Middle ~chuo!; ~r. ~a~t ~cti, Cth Qrade, Midlothian Niddle Schoul~ Mie~ Kathleen Ledlie, 6th G~ade~ Midlothian Middle School; Mr. Dave Ledlie, Sth Grade, Midlcthian Middle School, ~r. ~rian Zagicus, 6th Grad~, Swift Cre~k Middle School: Miss Sarah Franklin, 7%h Grade, Providence Middle School; and Mr. Justin G~ther, ~th Grade, Providence ~iddle School, concerns relative to recycling in the home and community; noted that April 22, 1998, i~ b~ing o~leb~ated ~ the 20th anniversary of "~ar%h Day"; encouraged the Board to urge schools and businesses to recycle; asked the B~ard to ma~e concentrated effort and commitment to establish programs and allocate monie~ toward the recycling effort; suggested that ~u~ds be provided ~or the placemaot o~ recycling bins at County sehool~ for th~ collection of glas~ and pla~%ies; e~tablish ta~k force of ztudent~/teacher~ to a~siet the Board with environmental issuss~co~cerns to promote a healthy enviroIlment for all oitizen~ of the County; and prezented each ~oard member with an Alberta Spruce tree as s token of appreciation and reminder of their cause. Tho Board commanded all the students involved for an excellent commitment to recyclinq; indicated the County has an establish- ed Recycling Committee to which they invited =he students and their teachers to contact the appropriate Board member~ to di$cusa ihs formatiea of an Advisory Group to attend Re0yeling Committee m~etinqs. 9. ~SOL~TIONS AND S~CI~L ~cOGNITION~ {¢ontlnu~} 9.E. MS. SUS~NBUTCHER, FOII~THTII~WIN~IEN OF Tn~ I~ITAROD in which sled ~og tpam$ ¢omp~o against each other and the WHEREAS, Ms. Susan Butuhsr has won ~he Iditarod four times--in 1986, 19S7, f988 and most recently in 1990; ~nd the world and is visiting Chesterfield County as par~ of the NOW, T~RRFOR~ R~ TT R~$OLV~D, that ~h~ Chesterfield hereby commend h~r for hsr accomplishments ~long the Iditarod Trail. accompanied by her husband, ~r, bari4 Monson mod l~ad husky, Grani=e~ expressed apprsciation for her sharing her adventures with County Citizens %hr0ug~ her participation in the Winter Lecture Series; and commended her for her accomplishments in being a four-time winner of th~ Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race, 9.F. ALLZ~D ~IB~ ~0~ S~0NSORSHIP OF L~C~l'u~ BY MS. SUSi%N On motion of tke Board, the following r~solotion was adcpted~ WT{EREAS, The Ckesterfield County Perks amd Recreation Department functions to positively effect the quality of life in Chesterfield COunty; and W~REAS, The provision of the Winter Lecture Series represents an important means e~ achieving fhis function; and W~EREAS, A ~peaker of %he caliber of Ms. ~usan Butcher, four-time champion of the Iditarod Trail $1e~ Dog Race, provides Chesterfield residents with an opportunity to hear of her significant adventures. NO~ TH~R~FOP~ ~ IT ~ESOLV~D, that the for it~ geuero~s sponsorship of {he I990 Winter Lecture Serleg. Vot~; Unanimous ~r. Curxin proven%sd ~e ~xecuted resolution to Mr+ Earl Dye, ~r. John Te~ini, M~. DOnald- Jon~s, Mr% Ra~ond Galliard, Yvonne Parv~r~ and ~s. ~ Taylor ~ Allied F~bers who present and expressed appreciation fo~ %hair participation in the sponsorship of the 1990 winter Lecture Series. It was generally agree~ =o recess for five (5) minutes. 10. H~ARTNGS OF CX~]E%,q~ OH U~S~D,.ULED ~IATTERS OR CLAIMS {con~inuecl) 10_B. ~R. SAM ~AGSTAFF A~D/OR A AC~$ SUBDIVISION ~GAN~ING COURT'/ ASSESSMENTS ~r. Charlie 0wen~ Mr. Sam W~g~taff and o~he~ citizens addressed the Board regarding the recent increased County aseessmen~s askinq that the Beard consider a reduction in the ~ax rate to compensate for th~ increased assessments. Concerns w~ra expressed tha~ the uurrunt assessments most particularly adversely impact ~hoss individuals tha~ are r~tired, on fixed-incomes and place a severe financial burden on them. C~%~ 20 BY R~PEASING SECTION 20-199 OF ~ CODE OF T~E CO~TY OF C~EST~RF,IELD, 1978, AS AMENDS., I~ELATIN~ Article XI of Chapter lO of the Coun=~ Cc~e which would, in effect, repeal the current $I0 ann~al fee require~ of those Mr. Currin ~tated he requested ~hat a public hearing date be 90-326 4/11/90 calls, from his and other District constibuents, .regarding the Concept of chargin~ a fee for notiiyiug =hem that they must have their septic eyatems pumped and that he is not requesting the required p~mpinq be eliminated - only the fee. Mr. Daniel referenced the Charlottesville meetln~ at which the Boaxd considered this and other septic systole i~su~ and at which time they set certain standards by which they unanimously aspects of the ordinance was the maintenance and pumping. Mr. Mayas stated he felt charging the $10 was unconscionable; that the majority of reslden~s utilizing septic system~ reside in the Matoaea District and would be the ones most affected by the proposed ordinance; indicated support for ~r. Currin's proposal; and subr~itt~d petitions containing ~81 ~ignature~ in suppor~ of eliminating the fee. Mr. Appleqate indicated he also had received cells relating to the annual f~e charge; that the issue n£ concern was not the pelicy but the ~ee; and that he could support holding a public hearing on the matter. Mr. Sullivan stated he favored holding the public hearing as he was in%erected in the opinions of the public relative to this issue; that he did not wan~ To 3eopardize the policy but neither did he feel the burden of expense should be expended among tho~e who do not utilize septic ~y~tem~. On motion cZ Mr. Apple~ate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board set the date of May g, 1990~ at ?~00 p~m~ fo~ a publi~ hearing to eon~ider an Ordinance to amend Article XI of Chapter 20 of the Code of the Connty of Chesterfield, t97~, a~ amoaded, by repeal'ins Section 20-199 relating to annual fees. Ayes: Mr. Coffin, M~. SulI±ven, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Mayas. Nays~ Mr. Daniel. 11. DEFERRED ITEMS ll.A. P~LIC HEARINGS CODE OF x~t~ CODNTY OF C~STE~IELD, 197E, A~ AMENDED, WAST~ (~ CONSTI~CTION SITES Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Cheeterfield~ I978, as amended, relating to solid waste on construction ~it~ and presented a b~ief ~um~ry of the matter. Mr. John Dyke, President of Endicott Company, crated he basically agreed wi~h %h~ concept of the propos~ oxdiDa~ce~ however~, f~lt there would be enforcement difficultie~ and requested consideration be given to reducing the proposed fine to $100. Mr. Seorge B~adl~s voiced support for the original ordinance propnsal, as recn~end~d, and ~tated hs 'felt it could he modified at a later date, if necessary. There wa~ lengthy discussion r~lativ~ ho th~ differ~nce~ between the or~inally propoeed ordinanc~ versu~ an alternative litter control ordinance modeled on the ordinance in effec~ in Eenrico County~ the amount of the fine being consistent for AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 10 OF T~E of Chesterfield, virginia =hat: 90-327 4/11/90 Il) Cha~ter 10 ef thc Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, a~ amended, is hereby amended by addin~ a new section 10-19.2 a~ follows: Sec. 10-t9.2, Unlawful conditions of litter on construction mites. (a) ~very parcel of property upon which a building is being eonstr~cted ~hall be kept free of ~ind or water borne litter and of such an accumulation of litter as tm conctftute a nuisance or a threat to the hmalth or safety of public. It shall be the joint responsibility of the owner of the parcel and each contraeto~ performing ccnmtr~¢ticn on the parcel comply wi~h the requirement~ of thi~ mubsection. {b) A container ~hall ~e conveniently available for every pa~cei of property upon which a building i~ being constructed and shall remain available to the parcel from the time that construction activib~ ccnumencem until such activity The ¢oDtainer shall be of au£flciant cize to hold all litter demcribed above durin~ each work d~y. It shall be the joint responsibi!i~y of ~he owns: of th~ parcel and each contractor perforating constr~ction on th~ parcel tc comply with ths (c) Any p~rson violating the requirements of this section shall be q~ilty mi a misdemeanor subjee~ %o a fine of up tm ·hese was no second tc ~z. Currin'~ motion. Mr. Sullivan stet~ the concept for the proposed ordinance has been Under consideration for some tim~; that there have bean habitual offender; and the $500 fine is a compromise between the ceCOnvae~dations of $25 and $1,O00. Mr. Applcgate expressed statistics as to how many people h&vu actually been convictions; and indicated he felt the requiring of a dumpster for collecting the litter would be beneficial. Mr. Currin stated he could agree with s $100 fine but Act a $500 fine. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~eeonded h~ ~r. Daniul, the Board adopted khe following AN ORDINANC~ TO AMg~D CH~T~R 10 OF THY ~1) Chapter l0 of %h~ Code of =he Caunt~ of Chumterfi~ld, 197g, ae amended, is hereby mended by a~ding a new See. 10-19.2. Unlawful conditions of ~itter on constructio~ (a) Every parcel of property upon which a buildinq nuisance or a threak to the hsslth or safety of public. It shall be the joint remponsibili%y of the owner cf the parcel comply with the requirementm of this subsection. ~/11/90 (b) A container ~hatl b~ conveniently available for ov~ry parcel of property upon which a building is being constructed and shall remain available to the parcel from the time that construction activity commences until such activity The container shall be of sufficient eize to hold all litter described above derin~ each work day. It shall be the joint responsibility of the owner of the parcel and each contractor performing ccnmtruc~ien on the paromi to comply with the requirements of this subsection. (c) Any person violating the r~uiromonts of this s~al% be guilty of a misdemeanor subject to a fine cf up to Ayes: Mr. ~nllivan, Mr. Dante% and ~. ~ayes. Nays: Mr. Currin and Mr. 11.B. CONSIDERT~ROPOSED ~Y90-91 ~C~TAND 1991-199~ Mr. Steg~aiar 9resen%ad a brief sugary of the proposed FY90-9t budget, as am~n~d, during the Boar~s earti~r work sassion, tota%tin~ $473,827,500. He no~ed Lhe Capital Improvemen~ Prqgr~, am amended, ~otall~d $1~4,~3,100. from the Adult Deveiopment Center in %he Contribution List and it was generally agreed that the request could b~ handled administratively by the County A~inistrator after July 1, 1990. On motion of the ~oard, it was re~olved that th~ Board adopt in the total amount of $473,S27,500; and further, it re~olv~d that th~ Boar~ a~opt the FY1991-1995 County Capital I~provements P~ogr~, a~ ~ended, in the %oral amount Vote: Unanimous ll.C. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLIS~ T~ ANNUAL TAX ~z~d"f ON ~u~STEP~FI~f.n On me,ion of Mr. ~ullivan, s~con~e~ by ~r. M~yes, the Board adopted the following ordinance~ AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLIS~ T~E A~U~ TA~ COUNTY OF C~ESTE~IELD BE IT ORDAINED b~ the Board of supervisors of ehe County of Chesterfield ~ha~'fcr ~h~ year beginning on the first day of January, 1990, and ending on the thirty-first day of the County of Chesterfield sSall be as follows: On ~racts oi land, lots or improv~ment~ thereon and on mobile homes the tax shall be $1.09 on every elD0 of value thereof. Sec. 2. Personal Property. mo=or v~hicle~ and on all tangibla p~rsonal property u~ed held in connection with any mining, manufacturing or other bu~in~$$~ trade~ occupation or profession, including lugs, rumS=ute and appliances in re~tal =~its~ the tax shall be $3.60 on every $I00 of tho a~sesaed val~e (b) On aircraft as defined by S~tion 58.~-~Q3 and -3506 of =he Code of Vir~.iDia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $1.t0 on every $100 of the assessed value S~e. 3. Public Service Corporatiom Property. (a} On that portion of real estate and tangible personal property of public ~ervice corporations which h~s ~een equalized as provided in Section ~.1-26Q4 o~ the Code of Virginia, 195~ as amended, the tax shall be $5.09 on every $100 o~ the assessed value thereof determined by the State corporation Commission. (b) The ~cregoiuq subsections to the contrary noiwlth- standing, on auto~obiles and trucks belonging to such service corporation~ the %a× shall be $3.60 on every $100 of assessed value thereof. Sec. 4. Machlnar~ and Tools, On machinery and %eels used in a manufacturing or mining business the tax shall be $1.00 on ~very $~00 a~sessed val~e thereof. Vote; Unanimous ~r. Daniel requeet=d tha~ staff, in vie~ of th~ increased a~sessmenta experienced thix y~ar, ~egin developing a list of recoIm~endationa for consideration during next year's budget deliberations to reduce the tax rate and suggested a $1.02. ll.D. CON~ID~AN ORDI~kNC~ ~u~uMENT TO SECTION 20-R3, ~0-37 ~ 20-69 OF T~ ~u~'~ CODB ~EL~T~G TO ~H~G~S FOR WA?E~ AND WAtT.WATeR SERa, ICE On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, adopted the following ordinane~! C~EST~RFI~Lb, 1978, AS A~4ENDED, BY AMENDING AND the Board B~ IT O~DAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) Chapte~ 2~ cf the CoOe of th~ County. of Chesterfield, ~97~, as amended, is ~mend~d by ameudin~ and reenacting following sections: 20-23 Effective Date Of Service Charge The servie~ charges for water and wa$~awa~er shall oDDly to all ~ervice rendered after May 1, 1990. ARTICLE II, Water o o o 4/11/90 See. 20-37 Water Rate~o IR all ca~e~ net covered by contract made by the Board of Supervisors prior to July l, 1977 the eoDeumer shall pay char~ea in accordance with thc followin~ ~chedule~= ~a) Monthly Service Charqes The monthly ~ervioe charg~ shall be a~ follows: Customer Costs Charge: $1.95 per account per month COmmodity Costs Charge: $0.9S p~r hundred cubic (Col) Capacity Cast Charge: Dwelling, Single Family, (*} 5/$ 1.00 Including To~housea Dwelling, Two Far~ily {'~ 5/~ 1.~9 1.87 Dwelling, ~ultiple Family (**) 0~85 1.59 Trailers (par unit) (**) ~.85 1.59 All Other Customer Class=s: Number Monthly Meter Size of ERUS Capacity {Inchms) Per Unit Coat Charge 1.87 5/8 and 3/4 1.00 1,~7 1 2.5D 4.68 1-1/4 3.60 6.73 1-1/2 5.0~ 9,35 2 8.00 14.96 3 16.0~ 29.92 4 25.0~ 46.~ 6 50,00 93.50 8 80.0~ 149.6D 10 115.00 215.05 12 155.D~ 289.85 (*) Pe~ unit fo~ a dwelling residence with a 5/8 inch motor, Dw~lling~ ~rvod by larger siz~ mokor~ pay in accordance with the ~ehednle ~hown for all Other Customer Classes. See Chapter 21 for dsfinition. (**) Per unit, the per unit charge is based on .$~ of the 5/8" meter charge. See Chapter 21 for definition. o o o ARTICLE III. We~tewater oeo Sec. 20-69 Wa~tewater Char~, All consumers ~hall pay all (a) Monthly Servi~ Charges: The mon~hly ~erviQe charges eAall be as fellows; Customer Costs Charge: $1.95 per account per month (*) Uniform volume charge: $1.~4 per hundred uubic feet {Cur) l Capacity Costs Charges: Customer Class Number Monthly Meter Size of ~RUS Capacity (Inches) Per Unit Cost _ Char~s Dwelling, Single Family, (~) Dwelling, Two Faraily Dwelling, Multiple Family Trailers (per unit) (=) 5/8 1,00 6,30 5/8 1.00 6.30 0.85 5.36 0.85 5.36 5/8 and 3/4 1.00 6.30 1 2.50 15.75 1-1/4 3.60 22.69 1-1/2 5.00 31.50 2 8,00 50.40 3 16.00, 100.80 4 25.00 157.50 6 50.00 315.00 ~ 80.00 504.00 10 1t5.00 724.50 12 155.00 976.50 FO~ WaStewatsr-only ~rvice account. Per unit for a dwelling with a 5/8-inch meter. Dwellings serve~ by larger size meters pay in accordance with the mmhedule shown for all Otter Customer Classes, axoept where ~irtual meter size policies apply. See Chapter 21.for ~efinition. P~r unit, the per unit charge is base~ on .85 of the 5/8" meter charge. See Chapter 21 for definition. o o o Where residential premises are connected to the county wastewater system but not the county water system, the ~ervice charge shall he $t7.61 p~r month; FO~ all uther usmrs, the consumer will be requi:eg to install a privatm meter at his expense amd the service charge will b~ based on the meter reading or at the sole discretion of th~ utilities departs%tnt, a monthly service charge will be set. The location, size and manufacturer of the meter shall bs as approved by the utilities ~eparfuasnt. Vqtel Unanimous oeo On motion of Mr. Partial, seconded by Nr. adopted the following ordinance= Sullivan, the Boa~d AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 5-22, CODE OP THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, ~97~, AS A~ENDED, REI~ATI~G TO LICENSE TAXES BE IT QRDAINED by the Board Of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: 90-332 4/1I/9~ (1) That Section 5-22 of th~ Code of the County of Ckesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted as Sec. 5-22. License texee-Amohuts; exception. (a) The following license taxes are hereby levied: (1} Male. For a male dog, seven dollars ($7.00). fea~ale dog, five dollars ($5.00) upon presentation of a veterinarian's cor%ificate certifying that the dog is unsexed or, if such certificate is unattainable, a written ntatem~nt from the owner certifying that the dog is unsexed. (B) Female. For a femsle dOqt seven dollars (4) Kennel. FO~ twenty dogs, twenty-five dollarz {5) Kennel. ~Or fifty dogs, thirty-five dollars ($35.001. (h) No license tax shall ~e levied on any dog that is trained and serves as a ~uide dog for a blind person. Vote: Unanimous ll.F. CONSIDER AN~DM~NTS TO S~CTI~ 6-4 OF ~u~ OO~' CODE Vi~giniai follows: On motion o~ Mr. Daniel, seconded b~ Mr. Sullivan, the Board adopted the following ordinance! A~ ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 6 dP T~ CODE OF THR COUNTY OF CBESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMenDING AND ~d~NACT%NG SECTION 6-4 RELATING TO PE~IT FEES BE IT O~AINED by the Board of ~upervisors of Chesterfield County Chapter 6 of the code of thm Count~.p~._Ck~.~.~e~d, i5 amended and reenacted by ~ending Section 6-4 Sec. 5-4. Permit fees. (a) Generally. Unless otherwise excepted, no permit to begin work for new construction, all,re%ion, removal, demoli- tion or other building operation fo~ eon~ucti0n reg,/ired by the several provisiOnS Of thc Virginia Unifcl~ Statewide Building Cede shall be issued until the fees prescribed in this ~Qetion ~hall have been paid. No amendment to a permit necessitating an additional fee because of an incroase in the estimated cost of the work involved shall be approved an=il ~he additional fee has been paid. All ~nch per~its mhall be i~ued by the building official on forms approved and furnished by his office. The fe~ for permit~ ~hatt be based upon the p~oj%Ct cost for labor and materials. Costs submitted shall be no lower than those listed in the Narghall and Swift Index or other evaluation of building costs as approved by the building official. Minimum acceptable costs will be adjusted aunu~lly on July 1 to reflect changes in cost of construction. The building official may a~ess additional foos when a review of the permit application or plans shows that sufficient fees have not been paid. Fees will b~ charged in accordance with the (1) Duildin~: e. Commercial building structure, excluding signs: Two thousand dollars or less ....... $25.00 Each additional cae thousand dollars or fraction thereof cf e~timated construction cost ................................ $ 4.70 TWO fhousa:d dollars or less ........ $25.00 ~ach additional one thousand dollars or fraction thereof of estimated construction cost ............................... q. Accessory building: $1.45 per $300.00 of estima<ed cost: Minimum fee ....................... $25.00 Estimated cost of $500.00 or less..No Fee O O O j. Mobile home on srivate property (does not include electrical and plumbing} ......... $25.00 k. Permit reinstatement ..................... $25.00 O O O (6) Annual certificate of Co~pllancs for elevators,, ~scalators, durab~aieers and manfzfts: a. Such fees shall be as follows and shall be payable to the county on or befor~ December 31 of each year fo~ the following year. The fee ~hall include the cost of the appllca=ion for p~rmit. PasSenger elevators ................. $I5.00 Freight .elevators ................... 815.00 Dumbwaiters ......................... Manlif~s ..................... ~ ...... $15.00 Escalators (per flooz} .............. $I5.00 Note~ If th~ initial certificate o~ compliance is iasued on or after January 1 and on or before June 30, thc fe~ i~ one-half {1/2} the amount shown. If She initial certificate is issued on or after J=ly 1, there ia no charge for the initial ~ertlficate which will expire December 31 of the year in whluh the certificate issued. (d) Refunds on a~plication for permits cancelled on ,request of applicants. If "~n app~ioatiee f~'r a permit is aaneelled on request, of ~he applicant before a i~ued~ the pe~ie fee shall be returned by the building i~ received in the offic~ o~ the building offi~ial. If pe~it has been i~u~d, the permit fee shall bs returned upon written r%quest of the applicant witAin one year of the time the pe~it has been issued unless the permit has be~n assigned to another The following a~ministrative fees will be deducted from ~he refund: 90-334 411l/~O (I) Residential building permits ............. ~0.00 {2) Residential auxiliary permits ........... $20.00 (5) Commercial building p~rmihe ......... 20% of fee (4] C~er¢ial auxilla=y psrmit~ ......... 20% of fee (e) Fee for reinspection cf the sane type. In addition to the fees set out in this section, there shall be a f~e of =wenty-£ive dnllar~ ($25.00) for each inspection made in excess of two (2), if such inspection trips are made n~¢eesary d~e to work not being complete for inspection when request for inspection i~ made Or if corrections are not made before calling for reinspec%ien. ll.G. CONSIDER ANAM~f~DM~T TO TH~FYP0 B,U~G~:X'I'~APpROpRIATE $9,634,088 IN BONDPP/~JE~DS~ORCOUNTYCAPITAL on mo~ion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. App~egat~, the Board amended the FY90 Budget to appropriate $9,654,000 in bond proceeds ($9,040,8~0) and interest ($594,~00) to be used for County projects and i~uanc~ co~t~ ($9,~84,000 - COunty Costs; $I50,000 issuance cost~}, which appropriation ·ION OF I VArIAbLE WIDTH ~SEM~N~ FOR A 24 IN(~{ ~AT~RLI~q~ ~. CH~Ki~S W. BROWN, JR. There was brief discussion regardin~ the use of eminent domain for the acquisition of a variable width easement across p~ops~ty cf M~. and Mrs. Cha~lef W. B~CWn, Jr.; aefsrrel of the matter from the March 14, 1990 meeting to allow further review and/Or negotiation of the request; whether or not a compromise had been reached; On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board authorized the County Attorney to proceed with th~ u~e of emine~ domain against the following property owners amount as set opposite their names is net accepted. An4 b~ it f~rther r~elved that the County Administrator notify maid property owners by registered ~ail on April 1~, 1990 of the County'~ intention to enter upon end take the property which to be the ~ubject of said use of ~minent domain. This action is on an emergency basis and the Oeunty intends to exercise immediate right of entry, pursuan~ ~o Section 1S.1-239.1 of Code Of Virginia. Mr. Charles W. Brown, Jr. and Tax ~ap ?$-6(1) Mrs. Carolyn L. ~rown Parcel 8 $345.00 Ayes: Mr. Currin, Mr. Sullivan, ~r. ApDlegate an~ ~r. Daniel. Nays= Mr. Mayes, as he preferred not to ~uppcrt such matters. · PARCEL OF ~ CONTAINING SiX ~ ~CA~ROADS TO ALPITAM~RICA, INC. Mr. Sale stated thim dat~ and time had been advertised for a public hearing tc consider conveyance of a certain tract or parcel of land containing six acres fro~ting on Whitepine Road located at the Chesterfield County Airport Industrial Park to Atflt America, Inc. Me note~ Alfit America, Inc. nc longer desires to purchase a previously COnveyed parcel ~renticg Reyoan Road due to result~ of soil tests performed on that site and now wishes to purchase th~ whitepins Road. Mr. Robert Dotbear, ueprese~tlng Alfit America, Inc., was present. There was nc opposition On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. S~llivan, the Board approved and authorized the Ghairman of the Board and the County Administrator to e~ecu~e the necessary dccument~ for the conveyance of all that certain tract or parcel o£ land containing 6+ acrem, loeats~ in the Dale Magisterial Distric~ of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at the Ch~$keufietd Airport Industrial Park, which parcel fronts approximately 475 feet On Whitepine Road and is located approximately 1,690 f~et northwest of the intersection of whitepine and Reycan Roads, at a cost o~ $4~,000 per sore, to Alfit America, Inc. (A copy of ~aid plat is filed with tho papers of thia Soard.) ,13.A. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION~P~0~IATIN~ F~3ND~ ~OR FISC~-L ~ 1990-1991 Mr. Ste~aier stated th~ County Charter reqnire~ adoption of an appropriation resolution authorizing the expenditurm of funds for fiscal y~ar 1990-91, the d%tails of which resolutions d~%ail$ the allocation of funds consistent with th~ adopted budget. ~e noted that, as in Dri0r years, ~taPf r~c~ends that $I,0Q~,008 of the local ~unds for schooi~ be withheld allow the Board fle~ibility in adjusting ~he school appxoDriation at a late~ date in %he event of unanticipated circ~stances. so tha~ each year tha~ as service demands increase ~at the Dercentage of unappropriated ~und~ would be consistent and the ~otlar amount increase propo~Bionataly; the con~inuatlon withholding the $1,000,000 to allow the Board flexibility adjusting the school appropriation at a lat%r date in the event Mr. Applegate stated he felt that, in view of the good working r~lationship between the Sohool Board Liaison Co~itt~e, it would b~ a gesture of good faith to not withhold ~he $1,000,000 generally agreed to withhold $1,OOO,000 %rom ~e School Budget adopted %he following re~olu~ion; (1) That for the fiscal year beginning on the firs~ day July, ~990, and ending on the thirtieth day of June, 1991, ~ollowing sections ~hall be adopted: 90-336 4/11/90 Sec. 1 The following dmmignat~ fUn~$ and accounts shall be appropriatsd from the designated e~timated revenues to provide a capital improvemant~ program for and ~o operats tke County: Estimated FrOM General Fund Local SOUrCeS General Property Tax~ Other Local Ta~es From other Agencies State, Federal & Oth~r Localities Transfers & Reserves County Capital Improvements Fund V.P.S.A. Ressrve Reserve, Health Care Ant±cipat~d ~un~ ~alaD¢~ 7/~/9~ Total Reven~e Appropriations= Clerk %o the Board County Administrator's Office Budget & Management Mana§em~nt Services Administration General Services SaDitation Buildings and Grounds Registrar Information Systems Technology Accounting Internal Audit Purchasing Legislative s Volunteer Commissioner of Revenue Commonwealth's Attorney General District Court Police Department Fire Departmen~ Sheriff and Jail Social Serv~ce~ Mental Health/Mental Retardation/ ~r0bation Library Extension Servioe Community Development AOministration Economic Development Planning Department 42,739,1~0 5,917,400 ?,511,400 38,083,700 1,200,000 600,000 1,20O,OOO 1~,800,000 $262,597 256,900 199,000 323,800 645t300 ~1,600 I87,100 662,100 2,452,900 2,563,900 306,100 4,648,800 1,408,900 259,700 100,400 1,614,800 1,772,500 1,998,600 946,200 243,20~ 56,000 23,000 6,600 990,100 23,000 19~201,600 16,864,200 5,239,000 1,227,200 240,100 659,000 160,700 5,365,000 7,787 2,272 500 1~335 500 36 3 100 3,~60 3,4S6 3~0 255 900 29 600 354 800 1,032,800 1,819,0~0 90-337 4/1t/9~ Transportation Building Inspection Engineering and Drainage Street Liqht~ and Road~ Employee Welfare & Benefits Utility Right-of-Way Nun-Departmental caDital Projects D~bt Service Reserve, Pay As You Go Capital Pro,eats Balance, 6/30/91 Total General Fund School Operating Fund Estimated From Local Sources From Other ~gen¢ies State and Federal Government From the General Fund Total Revenu~ Appropriations: Adminis=ration/A s T PnpiI TranSportation Debt Food Service Total School Operating Fund County Grant Fund Estimated Revenua: From the State & Federa~ Covernmant From the General Fund Total Revenue Appropriations: Heusing Grant Co~%~unity Diversion !nc~ntiva Youth Services Litter Grant Pretrial R~l~ase Total County Grant Fund ¢o~nt~ CIP Fund EstLmated Revenue~ Interest Earnings Federal Other Localities Transfer from Utilities ApprOpriations! Transfer to County General Fund County C~pital Projects Total County CIP Fund ~44,800 2,023,900 1,706,000 345,900 2,928,600 32,700 1,~0~,300 2,515,00Q 12,657~600 121,~31,100 18,300,000 $262,597,700 3,105,500 92,045,400 1~0,162,200 $215,313,100 147,7~4,175 10,452,905 22,155,8~7 19,~21,000 @,s64,600 $215,313,100 862,400 78,900 153,900 447,700 73,500 63,600 12,500 190~300 941,300 1,200,000 360,300 40,000 59,200 202,000 $ 1,861,500 1,200~000 661,~00 $ 1~86t,500 Vehicle end Communicationm Mai~ten&nce Sales Appropriations: County Garage & ~etor Pool Communication~/~lectronics Total Vehicle and Communications Maintenance Risk Manaqement Fund Fund Equity 7/1/98 Total Revenue Appropriations; Ri~k Management Op~ratlons Fund Equity 6/30/90 TOtal Risk Management Fund Estimated Revenue~ U0e of Money and Property Transfer from General Fund Total Revenue A~propriationsz Airport Total County Airport Fund 2~imated Rsvenue: Transfer from General Fund Appropriations; Sourc~ cf Funds: Water service Cha~ges capital Co~t ~ecovexy Charges Other Revanu~ Use~ from %mprovemen= ~ Replacement Account Total Revenues Appropriations: Water operatione Nater Debt Transfe~ to Capital Projects Fund Total Water Fund 3,423,000 2,812,700 467,800 142,500 3,423,000 4,960,800 328,200 1,591,300 3,041,300 4,960,800 431,300 40,000 1~297~700 1~297,700 1,297,700 5,104,500 550,000 5,654,500 5~608,100 46,400 5,654,500 11~724,700 7,401,700 2,306,600 1,910,300 23,343,300 10,725,700 2,706,4Q0 9,911,200 23,343,300 90-339 4/1t/90 Wastewater Fund Source of Funds~ Wastewat~r Service Charges Capital Cost Recovery Fees Other Revenue Used from Improvement & Replacement Fund Total Revenue Appropriations: Wastewater Operations Transfer to Utility Capital Projects Fund Total Wastewater Fund 13,674,000 7,330,900 5,489,300 14,793,900 $ 41,288,108 9,148,500 5,434,000 26,705,600 $ 4'Y, 288,100 Utility Capital ProTects - Water Construction Reductions ~ Elimlna=ion of CIPts Bond Interest Total Revenue Appropriations: Water Capital Improvements Transfer to County Capltal Projects Total Water Capital Improvements 4,047,200 325,~00 6,234,900 9,91t,200 $ 20,5t~900 20,417,900 10I,~00 $ ,~9oo Utility Capital Pro,eats - Wastewater Construction Elimination~ & Reductions of ~rior Year's PrujecUs Bond Interest Bond ~roceeds Transfer from Waxtewater Fund To, al Revenue AppropriatioAs~ Transfer fa County Cap~tal Projecte FUnd 11,782~00 1,161,600 12,286,900 26,705,600 $-~1,937,000 51,836,000 I01,000 $5~,937,000 Sec. 2 Appropriations in addition to those contained in the q~ne~al appropriation ordinance ma~ be made by the ~oard only if there is available in ~ke gun=ual fund an unencumbered and unapprop~iat~ sum sufficient to meet such appropriations. ~ec. 3 ~xc~pt am set forth in Secti~ne 7, 13 and 14, the County Administrator may, as provided hareiR! authorize th~ one classification of expenditure to another within the same ~epart~ent er agenoy. The ~ounty Adminlstrato~ ~y transfer up to $15,00~ from the unencu~gbered balance of the appropriation of one department or agency tu another ~partment or agency~ including the contingency accoun~ encompassed ia th~ Non- Dapartmen=al appropriation. No more than one transfer may he made fe~ the same item causing the need for a ~ransfer, unles~ the =oral amount to be transferred for the item does not exceed $15,000. Sec. 4 Th~ County Administrator may increase appropriations for the following items of non-budgeted reven~e that may occur during the fisc~I year: 90-340 4Ill/90 a. Insurance recoveries received for damage to County vehicles or other proppr~y for which County funds have been expanded to make repairs. b. ~e~unds ar reimbursements made to the county for which the County has expended funds directly related to that refund er reimbursement. ~, Amy revenue source not to exceed $I5,000. See. 5 [a) Ail outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June ~0, 1990 shall be reappraprlated tc the 1990-91 fiscal year to the same departmmnt and account for which they are encumbered in ~ha previous year. Sec. ~ (b) At the close cf the fiscal year, a!l unencum- bered a~propriations for budget items other than Capital Projects, grants, and donations restricted to specific purposes ~hall revert to the Fund Balance Available for Appropriation Of the fund in which =hey are included. Sec. 6 Appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the ~nd of the fiscal y~er but shall remain appropriations until the completion of the project or until the Board Of Super¥isor~, by appropriate ordinance or resolution, changes or eliminatea th~ appropriation, upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to class out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. Thi~ section applies to all existing appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 1990 and appropriation~ in the I990-91 budget. 8ea. 7 That the County Administrator may authorize the transfer of Utilities Capital Pro]ect~ fund~ that are 20% or up to $100,000 of the original project cost, whichever i~ less, from any Utilities Capital Pro3ect to any other utilities capital project or to the balance of the water and wastewater construction funds. Sec. 8 That the approval by tho Board of Supervisors of grant of ~unds to the County constitutes the appropriation of both the r~v~nu~ to bo rocoived from the grant and the County's expenditure required by the term~ of the grane~ if any. The appropriation of grant funds will not l~pse at the end o~ fiscal year, but ~hall remain appropriated until completion of th~ project or until the 5oar~ of Supervisors, by appropriate re~olution~ change~ er eliminates the appropriation. The County Administrator may reduce an~ grant appropriation to level approved by %he granting agency during the fiscal year. Upon completion of a grant project, s~aff is au=heri=ed to close out the grant and transfer back to the funding ~eurce any remainiDg balances. This applies ~c appropriations for grants OUtStanding at June 30, 1990 and appropriations in the 1990-91 budget. Sec. 9 The County Administrator may appropriate bo~b revenue and expenditure for dona%ion~ made hy citizens or citizen groups in support of County programs. Any remmining unencum- bered balance of a restrlct~d donation at the en~ of the fiscal year will be reappropriatod into the subsequent ~isoal year. Sea. 10 The County Administrator may reduce revenue and exp~ture appropriations related to programs funde~ alt or in part by the Commonwealth of Virqin±a to tho level approved by the responsible state agency. S~c. 11 The Director of the Acuountlng Department is autho- rized to make tran~fer~ to the various funds fo~ which there are transfers budgeted. The Director shall transfer fnnds only as needed up to ~mounts budgeted, or in accordance with any existing bond resolution~ that specify the manner in which transferx are to be made. Sec. 12 The Treasurer may advance ~oni~s to and from %he various funds of the County to allow maximum cash flow effi- ciency. The adv~nce~ must not ~iolat~ ~ounty bond covenants or Sec. 13 The Coun%y Administrator is authorized to make expenditures from the f~llowin~ Trust & Agency Funds for th~ specified reasons for which the funds were established. In no case shall the ~xpenditure exceed the available balan~e in the fund: b. M, W. Bnrnett ~ployee Award Pond c. Special Welfare Fund d. T.F. Jeffre~ ~emorial ~und f. ~n~i©n Tr~t ~und in order to maintain the Insurance Fund. pay~for-per~ormance ¢oe~s in 1990-9~. kyso: ~r, Coffin, Mr, Sullivan, ~r. Daniel and Mr. Mayes. Nays: Mr. Applegat~ On motion of Mr. Styes, ~econdsd by Mr. Applegate, the Board ~pproved obtainin~ a cost estimate for the in~tallatlon of a ~treet light at the intersection of Branders Br~d~e Road and a=timate~ for the following locations in ~ame Districfi to permit ~taff to furthfir review said 1. 2429 Atdridge Avenue; and 2. Dupuy Road, between Laurel Roa~ and Loyal Avenue. · hie day the County environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made ~epert in writing upon hi~ examination of Woodlake Village Parkway, B~echwoo~ Point Road, Beeehwood Point Circle and R~¢hwcod Point Court ~n Beechwood Point, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of M~. Daniel, ~econded by Mr. Mayem, it is re~elpsd that Woodlake Village Parkway, ~eechwood Point Road~ Rcechwood Point Circle an~ Beechwood Poink Court in Bee~hwood Point, clover Hill Distric%, be end they hereby are established a~ public roads. And be i~ further resolved, thai thm Virginia Department of Transportation, b~ and it h~reby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Woodlake Village Parkway, beginning at existing Woodlak~ Village ~a~kway, State Route 3600, and going n0rthwes~erly 0.09 mile to the intersection with ~ssehwocd Point Road, th~n continuing northwesterly 0.02 mile to end a{ proposed Wcodlak~ Village Purkway; Deechwcod Point Road, 90-342 4/11/90 b~inning at thm i~ter~e~ion with woodlake Village Parkway and gelng northeasterly 0.05 mile to the intersection with B~ehwood Point Cirel~ thmn turning and going easterly 0.04 mile =o the intersection with Beechw0od Point Court, then centinuing Easterly 0.07 mile, then turning and going north- easterly 0.08 mile, then turning and ~uing easterly 0.07 mile to the intersection with Beschwood Point Circle, then continuing easterly 0.06 mile, then turning and going aurth- easterly 0.t0 mil~ to end in a cul-de-sac; Beechweod Point cirule, b~ginniug at the intersection with Ssechwcnd Point Rued and going ~outhea~%erly 0.10 ~ile, then turning ~d going easterly 0.16 mile~ th~n turning and gcSng northerly 0.06 mile to end at th~ intersection with Beechwood Point Road; and Beeehwood Point Court, beginning at the intersection with Beechwood Point Road and going 0.06 mile, then turning and going eas~erly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and d~nignated Virginia Department of Transportation drainag~ easements. These reads serve 65 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Tzanspor~atlon a 50' fiqht~of-way for all of the~e roads, except Bcechwo0d Point Road which has a 50' to 90' variable width right-of-way, and Woodlake Village Parkway which has a 70' right-of-way. Beeohwo0~ ~oint is recorded a~ follows; Plat Book 53, ~ages 88 & 89, July 29, 1986. Vote: Unanimous This day the County ~nvironmentai Engineer, in accordance wi~h directions from this Beard, made report in writing upon his exataination of Katie Lane in Wendell Acres, Mutoaca District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, ~econds~ by ~r. M~ye$, it is res~lve~ that KePis Lane in Wendell Ac~es, M~toaca District, be and it hereby is established as a public road. And bs it further resolved, that the virginia DeDartment of Transportation, be and it hereby i~ requested to take into the Secondary System, Kati~ Lane, beginning at the intersection with Graves Road, State Route 650, and going northerly 0.23 mile to end in a uul-~e-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Departn~nt of Transportation drainage This road u~rves 11 lots. And b~ it further resolved, that the Board of Supervibo~s guarantae~ ~e the Virginia Department Of Transportation a ~0' right-of-way for thi~ road. Wendell Acres is recorded as follows: Plat Book 35, Pages 46 & ~7, January 23, 1980. Vote: Unanimous This day the county Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Doard, made report in writing upon his e~sminat±on of Danhurst Drive, Danwoeds Road and Danbury Drive in Danhur~t Woods, S~ctien II, Midlothian District. 90-343 4/11~90 Upon consideration whereof, and On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayas, it is resolved that Danhurst Drive, Danwoodn Road and Danbury Dr£~e ia Danhurs~ Weeds, Section II, Midlothian District, be and they hereby are e~tablished as public road~ And be it ~urther resolved, thee the virginia Department of Tran~portation~ be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Danhurst Drive, beginning at existing Danhurst Drive, State Route 3513, and going northerly 0.02 milo to the intgrseotien with Danwoods Road, then continuing northerly 0,08 mile to end at the intersection with Danbury Drive; Danwoeds Aoad, beginning at the intersection with Danhurst Drive and going ~a~terly 0.04 mile to end in a temporary turnaround; and Danbury Drive, beginning at the intersection with Da~hur~t Drive and going easterly 0.05 mile to end in a temporary turnaround. Again Danbury D~ivu~ beginning at the intersection with Danhur~t ~rive and going westerly 0.04 mil~ to end in a dead end. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 30 lets. And he ~t further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia D~partmeat of Transportation a 40~ right-of-way for all of the~e roads. Darfuurst Woods is recorded a~ follows: Section II. Blat Book 66, Page 75, June 6, 1989. This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, me~e report in writing upon his examination of 01~ C~mp Rea~ and Winding Way in Edgehill North, M~dlothian District. Upon consideration whereof, and on ~otlon of Mr. Daniel, ~oonde~ by Mr. ~ayes, it is resolved that Old Ca~p Road Winding Way in Bdgehill North, Midlothian Distrle~, be and they h~reby ar~ established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is r~quested to take into Secondary System, Old Camp Aced, bsginnlng at existing old Camp Road~ State Route 2689, and going northwesterly 0.04 mils, then t~rning and going southwesterly 0.87 m~le to ~nd in a ~ul-de- sac~ and Winding Way, beginning at existing Winding Way, state Route 26~7, a~ going northarl~ 0.03 mile to end in a cul-de- This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia D~partment of Transportation drainage These roads serve 24 lots. And be it further resolved, thai the Board o~ guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transpertatlon a right-cf-way for all of these roads. Edgehill North is recorded a~ ~ollows: Plat BOOk 60, Page 69, March 21, t988. Vote: Unanimous 90-344 4/11/90 This dey the County Environmental Enqinee~, in accordance with directions from this Board, ma~e report in writing upon his a~amination of Crossings Way and CrOssings Ridge Drive in Cross Creek, Seotion C, Midlothian District. Upon oonsideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes~ it is remolved that Crossings Way and Crossinqs Eid~e Drive in Cross Creek, Section C, Midlethian District, be and they hereby are emtablished as public roads. And be it further remolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hessby is regue~ted to tak~ into the Secondary System, Crossings Way, beginning at existing Crossings Way, Stats Re=to 3773, end ~oing easterly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Cros~ingm Ridge Drive, th~n turning and going northeasterly 0.08 mile to end at propoaed Crossings Way, Cross Creek~ Seotion ~; and Crossings Ridge Drive, beginning at the intersection with Crossings Way and going southerly 0.07 mile to end in a kemporary turnaround. This request is inclusive of ~he adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 12 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of supervisors ~uarankee~ to tk~ Virginia Department of Tranmportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Cross Creek iz recorded e~ follow~: Section C. Plat Rook 60, Peqe 13, Jan~ery 14, 1988. STORM WATER ~%NAGEM~NT AGP~F/~NT FOR ~AT~FORD On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board a~therized the County Administrator to execute a StOrT~ Water Managemenk Agreement with the developer of Wa=urford, with the Ceunty'~ only involvement beinq to a~u~e that the maintenance agreement l~ beln~ followed by the owners. (It is noted a copy of said Agreement iu filed With the pap=rs of this Board.] 13.D.3. A~P~OVAL 0~ ~ID~ 13.D.3.a. SIT,WORK CONSTRUCTION FOR IRON BRIDG~ PARK, PHA~E III AND HUGUENOT PARK TER~IS COURTS On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. ~ayee, the Board approved and authorized the county Administrator to execute ~he necessary documents to enter into a ¢on~raot with Leadb~tter Construction, Inc., Ashland, Virginia, in the =mount of $928,800, for si~ewoxk cons~ruotion of fo=r softball fields, one baseball field, tennis courts, basketball court~, outdoor racquetball courts, parking and roads, neuter field and welkways at Iron Bridge Perk, Pha~e III end tenni~ co~rts at Huguenot Park. (It is noted funding is available from the 1985 end the 1989 Bond Referendums.) VOte: Unanimo~ 90-345 4/11/90 13.D.3.b. CONSTRUCTION OF ATHLETIC FACILiTY.LIGHTING AT IRON On motion of Mr. Dani~I, seconded by ~r. Mayas, the Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to exacute the nuceuuary documents tO enter into $ con,rack wi~/1 Structural Contractors, Ltd., in the ~mount of $72,753.00, ~or the construction of athletic facility lighting for the Iron Bridge Park Suotball f/eld, Point of Ro~k$ Parks basketball courts and Chalkley Elementary school baseball field. (It is noted ~unding is available ~rom the 1989 Bond Referendum.) 13.D.3.c. CONST~OCTION OF REST..~00~/CONCESSION BOI~DINGS AT I~N B~DGE P~ ~RO~ID~ MIbb~ ~L O~ motion of Mr. Danlel~ seconds~ by Mr~ ~ayes, the approved and authorized the County A~n~strator ~o execute the necessary dot,ants to enter into a contract' with Constr~utio~, Co., Inc., in the amount of $315,000.00, for the construction of restroom~/~Oncession buildlnqs at Providence ~iddle SChool and iron ~ridge Park, which construction will include a restroom at the Provid~Doe Middle ~c~col A~letic Complex, a =estroom at the Iron ~ridge Football/Soccer a~a and re~troom/concess~on buildings at Iron Bxldg~ softball b~seball complexes. (It is noted fundinq i~ available from 1989 Bond seferend~.) i~.Z.1. CONSENT 13.Z.l.a. ACC~FXANC~ OF DEED OF DEDICATTOW ALON~ ~ ~T~ET ~0AD ~ J. B. ~4~NLL~ .L~.I~ T. CAMP~LL~ JOSEPH ~ING, III ~ J. ~Y 0n motion of ~r. Mayas, ~econded by Mr. Cu/rln, the Boar~, behalf of %h~ County, accepted ~he conveyance of a 20~ s~rip land along ~u~l Street Road from Mr. J. B. CampbeLl, T. C~pb~ll~ ~r. Joseph J. Harding, III and ~r. J. Larry Rutherford and authorized the Count~ Administrator to execute the necessary De~d Of Dedication. (A copy Of said plat. Unanimous 13.E.l.b. AOCFi~ANCE OF DR~D OF DEDICATI~ ALONG On motion of Mr. ~eye~ ~ccnded by Mr. Currin~ tho ~oard, behalf of ~he Coun%y~ ~ccepted the conveyance of u 20' strip of lan4 along West ~undred Road from Safety-Klean Corp., A Wisconsin Corporation and au=hot,zed the County A~ini~t~a=or to ~xecute the nece~sa~ Deed of Dedication. (A copy of plaa is filed with the papers of this Board.] Vote: Unanimous 13.R.1.~.. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR RNON CHURCH ROAD I,;A'm~.v ~INM On motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Currin~ the Board awarded a construction contract {~89~0718) fo~ the rehabilitation and extension of the water line in Enon Church Road to the 1ow bidder, Gerald K, Moody, Inc., TIA Southern 90-346 4/11/90 construction COmpany, in the amount of $151,631.35, which water line will rsDIac~ the existing 4" water line on Enon Church Road between Rivermont Read and Jefferson Avenue and will provide increased volume and fire protection to th~ area; and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary appropriated in the 1~89-90 Capital 2mprov~ment ~rogram.) Vote: Unanimou~ 13.~.l.d. A~A~D OF CON~P, AC~ FOR WATER PdSHABILITATION, PHA~M I O~ ~otion of Mr. ~ayes~ ~ecOnded by Mr~ Currin, the Board awarded a cone=ruction contract to the low bidder, Gerald K. Moodye Inc., TIA Southern Construction Company, in the a~ount of $264,S22.4Q, ~or Project 89-~719, Water Rehabilitation, Bha~e Ir for the rehabilitation of various water lines in the followin~ areas an~ euthmrized the County Administrator to execute the necessary contract: 1) Winfree Avenue off River Road (Matoaoa District); 2) Forest Glenn Circle (Bermuda District): 3; Rivermont Road between Florenc~ Avenue a~d Spruce Street (Bermuda District); 4] Windsor Road and Per~ue ~treet (Bermuda District); 5) Railroad ~treet between Dodomeade and Gill Streets {B~rmuda D~stri=t); and 6~ Shell Road (Bermuda District}. Vota: Unanimous 13.E.l.e. R~QU~$T FOR PE~I%ISSION TO CIP~ TREES IN A PORTION OF A 50 ~OOT RIGHT-OF-WAX M/,IO%,II~ ~ FIREWOOD LANE On motion of Mr. Mayes, s~conded by Mr. Currin, the Board approvod a license agreement with Mr. Raymond E. Strang to allow the c~tt±ng of only thos~ trees within 20' of either side o~ tho centerline o~ ~ ~0' County right-cf-way known Firewood Lane, located off Graves Road in Matoaca Dis%rlct~ which would h~n~per access of emergency vehicles, subSect to the Vote: Unanimous 13.H.2. ~FORTS ~. Sale pre,eared the Board with a report on the developer water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator. 13.F. NEPORTS Mr. Ramsey presented th~ Board with a status report on General Fund ~ontingency Account, General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Road and Street Light Fun~e, Lease Purchases, School Board Agenda and the Board's Public Hearinq Schedule and Dinner MeetingS. M~. RamSey ~a~d tho Virginia ~epartment cf Transportation has formally notified ~he County of ~e acceptance of ~h~ followleg roads into the State Secondary System: ADDITIONS LENGTH MASON WOODS~ SECTION C (Effective. Route 4021 (Mason Run Drivs) - From .02 ~ile . North=asr Route 4020 to Route 402~. ~.~.:.- ~ '; "6.'10 ~i. 90-347 4/11/90 ADDITIONS LENGTH ~S0N WOODS, SECTION C (Effective 3/26/90} continued Route 4024 IRast Run Conrt) - Rro~ R~ute 4021 to .06 mile Northwest ROUte 4021. Route 4025 (C~nderwood Drive) - From Ronte 641 to .12 mile W@s% Route 541. Route 4026 (M~eon Valley Drive) - From Route 4025 to .22 mile Northwest Eout~ 4025. Route 4027 [Mason Valley Court) ~ From Rout~ 4026 to .0~ mile Ncrtk~ast Rou~ 402~. 0.06 Mi. 0.12 Mi. 0.~ Mi. 0.03 Mi. Mr. Ram~y e×presse~ appreciation ~or the dfli~ent efforts and c~mmitment o~ all th~s¢ involved in the preparation and 14. A~JOU~,~NT On motion of Mr. CartOn, secon~e~ by Mr. May~, ~he ~oard adjourned at 9:30 p.m. (DST) until 9:00 a.m. on April 25, I990. Vote: Unanimous Lana~ B, R~J~sey County Administrator C F Currln, Chairman 4111/90