Loading...
05-09-90 MinutesMAY 9# 1990 Supez~o~ in ~ttep~lance; C. F. Coffin, Jr., Chairman M. B. SnLlivam, Vice Chairman G. H, Applegate Harry C. Daniel Mr. Lane B, Eamsey County Administrator Sohool Board in Attendance~ Mr. Jeffrey S. Cribbs, Chairman Mr. Griffin R. Burton, vicu Chairman Dr. John A. Cardea Mrs. J®an Copeland Mr. William H. Geodwyn, Jr, Dr. E. E. [G~ne) Davis, Superintendent ~r. ~atrick Lacy, Counsel Co the School Board Staff in Ms. Amy Davis, A~st. to Co. Admin. Mrs. Doris ~e~art, Legit. eves. Intergovern. Affairs Clerk to the Board Firs Department Mr. Bradford S. Hammer, Deputy Co. Admin., Dir., Gen. Services Mr. Thomas ~. Jacobsen, Dir. cf Flanning Ms. Mary Leu Lyle, Dir. of Accounting ~r. ~obert Deputy Co. Admln., H~an ~ervice~ of Economic Developmt. Mr. Steve Micas, Co. Attorney Mrs. Pauline Mitchell, Dir. of N~w~/Info. Services Chief of Police ~s, Jean Smith, Dir. of Social Services ~r, Jay Dir. of Budget Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr., Dir. of Park~ & Rec. ~r. David Watchons, Di~. of Utilities ~r. Frederick willis, Dir. of ~uman Mr. Currin called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. (DST) in the Administration B=ilding Conferenoe Room (Room 502), 1. R~.CUTIVE SESSION WITH SC~tOOL BOARD On motion of Mr. Applagat~, seconded ~y ~r. ~ullivan~ th~ Board of Supervisors went in~e Executive S~ss~on to discuss the condition, acquisition or us~ of real property for public purposes pursuant ~e S~ctlon 2.1-344{a) (3) of ~_he Code of virginia, 1950, a~ amended. 5/9/90 On motion of Mr. Cribbs, seconded by My. Burt~n~ the School Board went into Executive Session pursuant to Section 2.1-344(a) (3) to discuss possible land acquisition. V~%e: Unanimous Reconvening: On motion of M~. BUrtOn, $~oonded by Mrs. Copeland, the ~e~rd approved the following resolution: NOW~ T~EREFORE~ BE IT RE~©LVEE tha~ the School Board hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public hn~fne~ matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive session to which %h%~ c~rtification r~zolution applies, and (ii) only such public business mat=er~ as wars identified in the motlon convening th~ ~xecutive ~eaaion were heard, discussed, or considered by the school Board. The school Board being polled, the vote was as follows: Dr. Cardea: Aye. Mrs. Copeland: Aye. Mr. Goodwyn= Aye. Mr. Burton: Aye. Mr. Crihbs: Aye. On motion of Mr. Applegate, ~econded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved ~he following resolution: W~EREAS, the Board of Supervisors ha~ thi~ day adjourned into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vo=e cf the Board, and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Informs%ion Aot~ and WHeReAS, the virginia Freedom of Informatlen Act ~ffective July 1, 1999, previde~ for certification that such Executive Session was conducted in conformity with law. 8uperVlSOrS does hereby certify tha~ to the be~t of each member's knowledge, i) only public business mat=ers lawfully ~x~mpted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom Of In£ormation Act were discussed in the Executive Session to which this certification applies, and ii) only such public bu~ine~ matter~ as were identified in the Motion by which the considered by the Board. NO member dis~ent~ from this certifi- The Board befog polled, th~ vote was as follow~ Mr. D~niel: Aye. Mr+ Maye~ Aye. Mr. Applegate: Aye. Mr. Sullivan: Aye. Mr. Currin: Aye. It was generally agreed to recess for five (5) minutes. ~r. Jacobsen pre~nt~d a su~hmary of the Upper Swift Creek Plan/Chesapeake Bay Preservation ACtr outlining e comparison of water quality goats/reeemmendations of the swift Creek Reservoir Watershed v~r~ns those of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act; holed the similarities and differences in the two approaches; indicated that a combination ~f standards appear to be the best approach to achieve the stated water quality goal Eot the Swift Creek Reservoir; and au=ed the schedule fur work uea$iens/publin hearings fe~ both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors on said issues. Discussion, questions and co~uuent~ ensued relative to specifics of retentieu ponds; the cenzultant'e recommendation, companioned with staff recommendation, to accomplish %he wate~ quality standards through the use cf the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Standards; impacts on pending ~oning cases; ~ach louallty's development of standards and specifications to be rev±ewe~ by th~ ~tat¢; penalties for not adhering to performance standards; etc. It wa~ generally agreed to procee~ with staff's reeommende~ approach to achieve the stated water quality goal for the ~wi£t Creek Reservoir ~hrough utilization of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act standards a~ follow~= 1. Establishment of ~erf~rmance staD~ards; and 2. Allowing the developer choice of epen space/best management standards to meet standards~ and 3. Enforcement of standards a= site plan/plat approval; and ~reserva~ion o~ wetlands, floodplains and buffer a~ undisturbed open space. Due to time constreints, it was qenerally agreed the Meadow- ville Plan would be discussed as scheduled on the agenda du-~-~n~ the even~-~g session o~ the meeting. 2.C. ~POSED C~ARTZa ~ .,m~s Due to time cenutruint5, ~t was gen~rally agreed th~ propo~d agenda during the evening Session of the meeting. The BOard recessed et Cefe for e dinner me,ting with Chief~. (DST] to travel to the Sunsmt the Volunteer Di~trlct Fire 3. DINNER WIT~OLUNT~R DISTP. ICTFIR~C~]~F8 Mr. Currin called ~he m~etia9 =o order at 5:15 p.m. (DST). Introductions wer~ made of those present and dinner followed. 5/9/90 Chief Lonnie Miller outlined the volunteer district fire units aoeomplishment~ during 1989 relative to response to fire Emergency Medical Service (EMS) response time, recruitment efforts, most savings and prezented budget requests for FY/990-91. Discussion ensued relative to Oonuid=rution cf the adoption and implementation of a voluuteer fire fighter pension plan as recommended in the Emergenc~ Services Study and pensiun benefits versun per~onaI property ta~ reduction benefits, after which the Chiefs were polled for a consensus as to which benefit the volunteers would prefer. The BOard expressed eppreciatibn for the opportunity to meet with the District Chiefs; for the l~adership displayed during the transitional move from the Bo: Air to the Rmblous Fire Station; acknowledged the dedication and professional provided te the citizenry; and ~ta:ed the County is proud its fire departments and staff who give so ~reely a~d diligently of their time. Mr. Mayee stated he wished to expres~ p&rtioula~ &p~reciation for the support provided to the Ma~oa~a District residents during the recent tornado. Mr. Ramsey and Chief Eanes conm%ended the professionalism and dedicated efforts of volunteer and staff fire fighters. ~. INVOCATION Mr. Curriu in, reduced Kx. M. D. '~Pet~" ~tith~ Jr., Director of P~rks an~ ~ecreation Department, who gays the invocation. 5. PLED(~ OF i~tt~G~IA~CE TO TH~ FLAG OF 'k~ UNITED STATES OF Members of Cub Scent Pack %874 and Boy Scout Troop ~874 of St. Luke's ~nit~d ~ethc~iet Church led the ~ledge of Allegiance to 6. APPROVAL OFM~i~u'£~.~ On metie~ o~ M~. sullivan, seconde~ b~ Mr. Payee, the Beard approved the minutes of April 25, t990, a~ ~bmitt~d. Ayes: Mr. Ceftin, Mr. Bullivan~ Mr. Dani~ an~ Mr. Payee. Abstention: Mr. Applegete, as he was not prs~ent for the entire meeting. Chief Eanes, Director of Emerqeney services for the county, preseDted a brief synopsis relative to the damage that resulted from a recent tornado which struck portions of Chesterfield County during the evening of ~ay 4, 1990. He ~res~nted ~lides depicting ~ind/sterm damage experienced in the affected portions of the County which was estimated at approximately $400,000+. He further stated, a/though there was a great deal Of physical damage, there were no personal injuries. He introduced and commended Chlel Joseph E. Pittman, Jr., Chief of Police, and Battalion Chief Pa~l Mauger, Fire Department, for their assistance during the storm. Mr. Ramsey ~tated that ~taff i~ requesting Board approval of a resolution, to be added to the agenda, declaring a state o~ ~mergeney in th~ ~outh~a~t~rn ~ction of th~ County so a request for State aid can proceed; that, as a result cf the Matoaca District to assist p~operty owners with their dehrie removal problems; a~d commended the Appomattox River Water A~thority for providing the site for the disposal of the debris. Mr. Mayes mxprsssed appreciation on bshelf of the 90-390 519/90 ~atoaca ~istrict cf=irene for the pre~essional an~ outstanding ~ervioe amd ~uppert provided to them in this time of distress. Ms. Pauline Mitchellt Director cf News and InforA%ation, introduced Mr. George L. Fiokett, Jr., an e~ploy~a of the County Environmental Engineering Department and Bermuda Hundred historian, whose interest, determination and efforts culminated in the develmument of a teun of the Bermuda Huadred Campaign ~rea of the County which occurred during the Civil War. She stated Mr. Fickett has been working cooperatively with the Chesterfield County Historical Societyr variou~ members of County staff, the Virginia Department of Transportation and several private organizations to create a driving to~r of important Civil War sites r~lating to the Bermuda Hundred Ca~paiga and noted booklets relative to the Campaign will be available fo~ purchase from ~he Historical Society and the ~ewa and Information Office. ~r. Eickett presented the Board with a sign depicting the Bermuda Hundred Campaig~ logo coau~emorating the event. B. BOARD COIg,fl.i-rr;E REPORTS Mr. Daniel reported he attended the Capital Region lir~ort Commission meeting; the Executive Board of Directors for the Virginia Association of Countie~ at which a raper= was received relative to the Governor's Commission on the Quality of Education which will impact Chesterfield County in the areas of socioeconomic influences, programmatic and physical n~eds and requested that Mrs. DeHart ~ttend a May 14, ]990 meeting in ~iohmond relative to the property tax rate and. ~ts impact on the educational funding level dud to keep abreast of developments in this matter as it could alter the receipt of State funding; and at which there was dimoUgslon of House Bill S$0t ~he Grayson Com~ission Legislation~ to which there is concern regarding a split in uaiformity among counties resulting from a prov~mion provides for the anne×atica of eeuntie~ by towns through ordinances; referenced the impact of multilingual and migrant worker influences on various communities throughout the Commonwealth where the English language, as a form o~ local communication, is no longer the meeting of ~e Crater Development Company. Recycling Co~ittee meeting which he felt wa~ beneficial an~ at School Board Liaison Co~itte~ meeting a~ which th~r~ was discussion rela~iv~ to the Strategic Futures Report which report was initiated by sr. Daniel amd which the Liaison Council regardiog the Midlothian Beautification Proje=t and after which he presented Certificates of Appreciation to the 90-391 5/9/90 Mr. Currin r~ported he attended the School Board Liaison Contmittee meeting, which he felt was very informative and beneficial; th~ Recycling Committee meeting, in which respect he anticipates that Chesterfield County will be a leader; and District who expressed their appreciation for the eupport and aervioe provided by public eafety personnel during their time of distress. 9. RE(~IESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, EE~GENC~ADDITIONS OR by Mr. Mayee, that the Board move out of sequence Item 13.D., Public Rearing to Consider an Ordinance to Amend Article X! of chapter 20 of the code of the county of chesterfield, 1978, as Amended, by Repealing Section 20-199 Relating to Annual Fee~, tu be heard prior to ltem 13.A., Public ~earing tu Consider tke M~adowvitIe Plan, an ~mend~nt to %he ~a~tern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan, an Element of the Chesterfield County Comprehensive Plan, whi~hAm~ndment Specifically Addresses Land Uze and Tranepcrtation Issues within the Area Rounded by the James River, by North Enon Church Road, by East Hundred Road, and ~y Interstate ~ighway 295. On motiom of ~r. D~niel, seconded by Mr, Nay~s, the Board deleted Item 14.F.3.e.~ consider Request from Phil Gardner Co., Inc. for Permission to Encroach on an Existing Fifty Foot Right-of-Way~ added Item i4.E.3,, $~t May 23, 1990 ~ubllc Hearin~ to Consider Conveyance of Property at Airport Industrial Park to Alfit America, In¢.; added Item 14.H., Resolution ~roelaiming Local Emergency in a Portion cf Chesterfield County, to follow Item 11.; and adopted thc agenda, as amended. Vote; 10. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL I{ECOGNITIONS 10.A. I~ECO~NIZI~G ~AY, 1990 A~ "FOST~R pA~RNT I~XJGNITION On motion of the Board, the following resolution wac adspeed: WHEREAS, Our society ~epends upo~ ~amily llfe to prepare each new generation of children to be responsibl~ citizens; and WMRR~AS, Som~ troubled families in our con,homily afc not able to safely care for their children while resolving problem~ a~ hom~; and WH~AS, ~e-mporary foster ca~e ia needed ~o provide a refuge for children who are at risk ts be abused or ne~lected~ and WH~REAB, Many f~milies in Chesterfield County have open~d their homes to these children by becomln~ fester families who work with the public and prlva%e agenniee whick serve ~rouble~ families i~ Our e0mmnnity; and WHE~S, Fo~ter f~ili~ impr~v~ th~ quality of life for their foster chiIdren, our co--unity aad future ~enmrations providing love, guidanc~ ~nd positive llf~ exDeri~nce~ to children placed temporarily in their care; and 90-392 acknowledge and support the co~pa~ion~ts work of ~oste= families to childrsn in our community. ~QW, T~R~OPd3 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors cf Chesterfield Coonty hereby proclaims the month ~f ~ay, 1990 as "Foster Parent Recognition MOnth" in Chesterfield County and calls this pr0cla~a~ien to the attention of all cftizen~. Vote: Unanimous ~r. Currin presented the executed resolution to ~. Betty Lee, Foster Care Supervisor, and Ms. 8uzanne Flen~ing, Chief Of Social Work~ and acknowledged the support an~ compassionate work cf foster families to children in the co,unity. ~0.~. ~OGNIZINGHA¥ 13-1~, 1990 A~ "NATIONAL On motion c~ the Board, the following resolution was adopt*da WHEREAS, The dedlcakedt lo,at and brave members of Police Departments throughout the County provide an invaluabl~ 9~vice to all citizens; and WHEIL~J~S, ~he week of May 13 - 19, 1990 is rscoqnize~ as "~a~ienal Pokice Week;" and W~EP/~AS, ~he County is proud and honored to have such ontstandin~ and prof~aslonal individuals ss police officers in Chests~field County who serve to pro,act the health, ~8fety and welfare of its citizenry. NOW, TE~R~ORE BE IT RESOLVED, tha~ the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors deslare~ the week of May 13 - 19, 1990 as "Police Week" in Chesterfield County and calls :his r~cognition to the attention of all its citizens. Mr. Currin p~esented the a~ecuted resolution to Chief Joseph Pittman, Jr. and commended the outstanding and professional individuals who 8~rve in the public safet~ sector to pro,act th~ health, safety and welfare of its citizenry. 10.C. RECOGNIZING MAY 1t-27~ 199.0, AS "VOLt~T~R ItB$CU~ SQnAn WEEK" On motion of th= ~oard, the following r~solnticn was adopted: WHE~S, Benslay-Bermu~a, Ettrick-~atoaca, Forest View and Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squads provid~ emergency pre- ~nswered thousand~ of G~lls and contributed thirty ~hou~and plus hours eo pa,lent care and un~ol~ hours o~ support by auxiliary and a~mini~trative me~urs; and ~E~A~, ~ach individual voles, asr undergoe~ extensive training and continuing ad,cation s0 %hat h~ or she may provid~ the highest ~uaI{ty patient care; and W~=~AS, These services ar~ provided twen=y-fo~r hours 'a day, three hundr~O and sixty-five days a year¢ free of charg~ and without personal compensation, r~pre~enting a considerable W~E~AS, Chesterfield County is co, it,ed to a~istlng the squads and making ~hem a long xtanOimg part of the Emergency 5/P/90 ~edical Services System end a~ks each citizen to recognize the contribution made by the volunteers. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the chesterfield County Board of Supervisors doe~ hereby proclaim the week of ~ay 21 - 27~ 1990 as "Volunteer Rescue Squad Week" and asks the citizens of Chesterfield County to participate in activities sponsored ky their local squads and to promote aafety at home, work, SehoO~ and on the roadways. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Currin presented the executed resolutions ~o Mr. Tom Cindy Alves, Chief Dispatcher of the Bsnsley-Bermuda Rescue Squad; Mr. Grog Spurlook, Chief of operations of the Forest View Rescu~ ~quad~ Nr. David Dance, Manchester Rescue Squad; end Mr. Rohn Brown, Volunteer Reer~i~ent and Retention Coordinator ~or tko County; recognized other members of area re~oue squads who were present; and co~nen~d those present for ~he unselfish, dedicated uervlces they provide th~ citizens of the County. ~0.D. BOY SCOUTS A~AINING 1~.D.1. ~. ~IN T. C~AZE on motion of the ~oard, the following resolution was adopted~ WI~BREAS, The Boy SCOUts Of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and W~R~A$, The Boy Scouts of A~erica was founded to promote c~tizenship training, personal development and fitness of individuals; and WHEF~AS, After earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout sDirit and living up %O the ~cout Oath and Law~ and NHE~AS, Mr. ~enjamin Trent Craze, St. Luke's ~ni~ed ~%hedi~ Ch~rch~ ~rOOp 874, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by tess than %we percent of those iudivlduals entering the Securing movement; and WHER~AS~ Growing through his experiences in learning the lessens o~ responsible citizenship and priOing himself on the great accomplishments o~ his County, indeed a men,er of a n~w generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RE$OLVED~ that the Che~terfiet~ County Board of Supervisors hereby ex=ends its congratulations to Mr. Benjamin Trent C~aze and acknowledges the good fortune of the County =o have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. 10.D.2. MR. ERIC F. ~4AI~R~R On ~otion of the Board, the following resot~tlon was adoptod~ WHEREAS, The Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. Willia~ D. Boyce on Febrnary 8, 191~; and 90-394 5/9/90 WH~AS, The ~oy Ssout~ o~ America was founded to promot~ citizenship training, per~onal developmenti and. fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, After earning at least twenty-one m~rit badges in a wade v~iety of fields, servin~ in a lsadership position in a troop~ carrying cut a servic~ project beneficial to his community, being as%ira in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and WHEREAS, Mr. Eric Frank Maurer, St. Luke's United Methodist Church, Troop 874, has accomplished the~e hiqh standards ef commitment and has reached the Iong-scu~ht goal of Ea~le ~cuut ~hich is received by loss than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; end W~EREAS, Growing through bi~ experiences in Scouting, learning the le~sons of respunsi~le ~itizenship and priding himself on the great accomplishments of h~$ C0~n%y, Erie is indeed a me~/oer of a n~w generation of prepared younq citizens ~f whom ws can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT R~$0LYED, that the Chesterfield to Mr. ~ric Frank Maurer and acknowledges the good ~ortune of the County to have s~ch an outstandin~ young man as on~ of its citizens. Vote: Unanimou~ 18.D.3. MR. BBANDT T~OMPSON On motion cf the Board, the following ~esolution ~as adopted: WH~R~AE~ The Boy Scouts of America was incorporate~ by ~r. William D. Boyce on February ~, 1910; and W~REAS, The ~oy ~eout~ of ~%eriea was ~nunde~ to promote citizenship training, per~onal development and fitness of individuals; and W~R~AS, After earning at l~ast ~wenty-one merit bad,ce in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying cut a s~rvi~e pxeject beneficial to his co~nity, being active in thc troop, demonstrating spirit and living up to the Scout Oath an~ Law; and Church. Troop 874~ has accomplished ~]ose high standards of occident and has reached th~ lung-sought goal of Eaqle Scout ~hich is received by le~ than two percent of those individuals entpring the Sccu~ing mcv~ent; and WH~S, Growing through his ex~eri~nce~ in 8coutinq, learning ~he lessons of responsible citizenship and priding indee~ a m~be~'Of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, T~F0~ ~ IT ~SO~V~D, that the Chesterfield COunty Board of Supervisors h~r~by extend~ i%~ congratulations to Mr. Rrandt Th~pson and auknowle~ges the good fortune of the Coun~y to have such an outstanding young man as one of Vot~ Unanimous ~0-395 5/9/90 10.D.4. ~. B. ~%~DON NEND~ On motion of the Board. the fol3owing resolution was adopted~ WHEREAS, The Boy Suuuts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyc~ OD February ~, 1910; citizenship training, personal development and fitneee of individuals; and WB~P~A$, After earning at least twenty-one merit budges a wi~e variety of fields, ~erving in a teademshi~ position troop, carrying out a service project beneficiul to his CO~ity~ being active in the troop, d~unutrutin~ ScOut spiri= an~ living up ~o the Scou~ oath and Law; and WHEREAS, Mr. ~. London Wend%, Et, Luke's United Methodist Church, Troop 874, he~ accompli~h~d co~i~ment and ham r~ached th~ lung-sough~ goal o~ Eagle ~cout eat~rlng the Scou=ing mov~ent; and ~ER=AS, Growing through his experiences in Scou=ing, learning ~e lessons of responsible citizenship and priding h~self on the great accomplishments of his County, Landon indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all b~ ~ery proud. County Board oi Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. ~. London W~ndt and acknowledges the good fortune oZ the County to have such an outstandin~ young man as one of its 10.D.5. I~R. A/~AN~ANKOWSKY On motion of the Board, the following ~esolueion wac udopted: WI4BR~AE, The Boy Scouts of Ameriua was inuerporatad by Mr. William D. Beyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, The BOy Scouts of America was ioundud to promote citizenship t~a~ning, personal development and fitness of individuals; and W~R~A$, After earDiDg at lea~t ~weDty-oDa merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being uctive in the troop, demonstrating Scout WR~I~A$, Mr. klan Yankewsky, Mt. ~£agah United Methodist Chu~ch~ TrOOp 897~ has ac0omplished tho~e high ~tandar~s o~ commitment and has reached =he !cng-sough= goal of ~ag!e ~¢out which is received by less than two percent of those individuals e~terinq ~he Scouting moveman%~ and WHeReAS, Growing through his experi~noos in Scou~ing, learning the lesson~ of responsible citizenship and priding himmelf on the groat acsomDliehm~nt~ of hi~ County, Alan is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very pr0~d. NOW, THEREFOF~ BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield 90-39S 519/90 County to have such an outstanding young man as one of it~ citizens. ~r, 9ulli~an add Mr. Applegate ~rssented the executed resolution to each of the Eagle Scouts, commended them for their outstanding accomplishments and recognized members e~ their families and troops who w%re p~eSent. Ms. Cathy Cazare~ addressed concerns regarding t~e YMCA's school-based child care program, the advantages sad disadvantages of private dayoar~ facilities verens the YMCA sohool-~ased ~roqra~, etc., and asked that th~ Board not eliminate her choice of the type care she deems in the .best interest of her children. Other citizens sohedule~ to address the Board regarding thi~ matter ware not presen=. 14. ~ 14.~. T~F~%LI~l%GENCY On ~otion of the Board~ the following r%zolution was adopted: W~REAS, the Board of supe~vi~6rs o~ the County of Chesterfield do~s hereby fiad that~ I. Due to the Court=y-wide h=a~ rains, windstorms and a tornado that cro~ed the Southeastern at 2200 hour~, the County of Chesterfield Of the prop~rt~ involved, a prccl~atlon cf NOW, THE~F0~, IT IS H=R=~Y PROCLAIMED that an emerqenoy exists throughou~ ~hts County; and IT I5 FURTHER PROC~I~D AND ORD~D, that dozing the existence of ~hi~ emergency the powers, functions and dutie~ of Organization of the County of Chesterfield were approved ~lans of the County of Chesterfield in order mitigate thC effects of the emergency. 12. D~RR~D I~Z~S There wer~ no deferred items scheduled at this time. I~.D. ~O CONSID~I~ AN ORDI~C~ TO AI~%ND ARTI~I~ XI OF CHAPTER 20 OF T~E CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ~ST~I~T~T.n, 1978, ~' A~ENDED, BY ~E~F2%LING .~.~CTION ~0-199 ~T.%TING TO ANNU~ ~r. Micas stated thi~ date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an amendment to Article XI, Chaptsr 90-397 5/9/90 20 of the County Code, relating to annual fees. Mr. Jerry Jernigac, a resident of the Matoaca District, pre~entsd the Boars with a petition containing approxi~ately 600 signatures opposing the $10 annual septic system inspection fe~ and mandatory pumping requirement. Me stated the petition requests =hat the requirements for fees and pumping be rescinded and a new ordinance be e~t~bliehed affecting those systems installed after July l, 1989. Mr. Ed Walker, a resident of Matceca, expressed concern as to why the requirement was originated and if in!ormatlen relevant to the issue were documented. He ~tated he i~ a lifelong resident of the County who grow up in an area utilizing wells and septic systems; that no on~ h~ kn~w had e~er been seriously harmed by the use of such systems; that if a system did fail, the Health Department was notified and the 'situation resolved; and that he objected no= only =o the County telling him how to maintain his geptie system When he had never had any problems with it but also the imposition of the annual inspection fee and mandatory pumpin~ requirement. Mr. Sullivan noted this subject wa~ on~ of major discussion at the ~oard's Charlottesville Retreat; that a public hearing was conducted on the matter which pei~mitted pDblie input; and tha~ documentation relative to the subject ordinance could he proulded by the Clerk to the Board of ~upsrvisors. When asked, Mr. Cnrrin briefly explained ~he purpose of the Board's meeting in Charlottesville. ~r, MayeS requested that staff provide ~r, Walker with information relative to the matter should he desire ~n unidentified citizen inquired if thi~ type requirement were in e~ect ~lsewhers in the Commonwealth and why Chesterfield and Mr. Melvin Branch inquired a~ t~ whether or not there were proble~ being experieuced in the County relative to septic system failur¢$ ~nd ~oiced opposition to the annual inspection fee and mandatory pumplug. in tact, presented the Board with information relative to the matter, stated the subject ordinance provided a meohauisn whereby the ~nvironm~nt coul~ b~ protected an~ that h~ £~lt th~ fee could be used to address problem~ facing septic system ~r. Daniel ~tated %hat, during a retreat to Charlottesville last year~ the Board investigated ramifications of the septic ism~e and developed an ordinance ~hioh they felt adequately addressed problems being experienced and which included he could support only the removal of the $10 annual inspection poodle in the County who utilize s~ptic systems. Mr. Sullivan stated he ~s!t the inspection fee was a user fee; ticns, the septic syste~ users should pay for it; that th~ groundwater quality by requtafing septic systems? that the fee in£ormatlon r~arding the number cf septic systems in the County and to notify residents avery five years to pUmp their systems; en~ shared he did not suppor~ r~p~aling the fee. Mr. Currin stated that numerous call~ from constituents had prompted his requesting that a public hearing be conducted to consider an ordinance amencl~ent to repeal the ~10 annual septic system inspection f~; that he felt the ordinance wa~ a geed one but the total cost of implementing the a~kainls~rative aspect of the program did not 9utweigh the controversy it had genere~ed~ and :hat h~ s~pported repealing the fee. On motion of Mr. Mayer, seconded by Mr. C~rrin, the Board ~dcpted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE ~Q AF~ND ARTICLE XI OF CHAPTER 28 OF TME CODE OF THE COUNTy OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS A/~ENDED, ~E IT 0~AINED~ by the Boa~d of g~pervi~ors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, ~hat Section 20-199 of the Cod~ of the CountL.,of Chesterfield, 1978, a~ amended, is hereb~ ~ended as follows: Sec. 20-1~, Reserved. Mr. Jacobsen stated ~i~ ~at~ and %~e had been advertised for a p~blic hearing t~ consider an ammn~ent %o the Eastern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan, which ~endment specifically addresses lend use and transportation issues with the area bounded approximately by the Jame~ R~ver, by North ~non Church Road, by East Mundred Road and by Interstate-295. He noted there was significant public participation in the planniug process wi~h a s~ries of me,tings conducted be%ween staff, ~rop~rty own=rs and residents to dis~u~ ~pecific land use zssues. He presented slides depicting the layou~ of the study area, proposed land and krauipor=atlon uses and state~ ~he Planning Co,lesion r~co~end~d approv~l of the Me~o~ilte irma Plan, ~ubject to six ~endments. Me noted that $~aff concurre~ wi~ am~ndment~ 3, 5 and 6 and described th~ issues addressed by am~n~en~s 1, 2 and 4. When asked, Mr. Jacobsen indicated th~ Plan~ as race,ended fox approval by ~h~ Planning Co~is~ion i~ding the entailed a portion of the Plan ar~a~ known as M~ights, be reEoned and redev~loped to a mixed use transitional u~e when all affected proper~y owners agDee an~ coopera~e in a unified d~v~Iopment. He noted ther~ are approx~ately 30-40 homes in this partiou!~ area that would be affected. race, ended by th~ Planning c~ismJ0n provided that anp one individual property own~ within the ~e:kinson Heights area could effeceively veto a propomed land use, which action he felt was not legally ~efensible an~ should be modified or deleted. Mr. Paul Dries, Mr. Rod Carpenter, MS. Bmverly $tokesbury, David Fairchild, Mr. Sidney Marrison, Mr. S~ Oliver, Joseph Monroe~ MS. Marti Oliver, Ms. Carolyn Powers, voiced support for approval of the proposed ~!an as re00~end~d by the 90-399 519190 Planning Commission including the amendments as specified; addressed suncerns regarding rezcnlng cf the Perk~nson Heights area in ~ts entirety to a mixed use transitional use, height restrictions, the reqa~r~ents for 20% open space excluding wetla~ds~ floodplains and other bodies of water; buffering, traffic congestion and safety hazards, participation of area residents in rezoninq as it occurs in the area, e~c. Mr. David Fairchild submitted a map cf the tres tine overlooking Mount Blanco indicating the visual impact ~f future developments on existing residential propertiss; ~r. sam Oliver requested ths Board consider the establishment of a County-wide committee, with representatives from eamh District, to review mpecific issues regarding wetlands and other pertinent environmental iss~e~; Mr. Joseph Monroe requested e copy of the Planning Commission's reco~ended amendments, including staff's comments, be provided to the citizens for their review and Mr. O~ver D. Rudy, Mr. Jeff ~i~ons, and Mr. Po~ter Veughan e~pressed concern that approval of the proposed Plan would hamper tke County's ability to develop %he indus%rial portions of the area because of certain restrictions and would preclude allowing the more intense industrial developments in the area, some of which would not be detrimental to th~ health and safety oi area residents and wuuld ~oost the County's ~o~merclal tax base; that the imposition of 700' foot buffe~ alenq North Enon Church Road was unreasonable as the Zoning Ordinance required only 10O' setbacks between light industrial and reuidenti&l useS; and further noted that the Plan is a guideline, not an ordinunce, and that to believe the Plan as written is mandatory and pre01ud~s all ~ev~lopment bu~ that which the area residents wish is unrealistic. ~tat~d there ara 1,500 acres of land already zoned ~-~ in area and available for sale; indicated he would prefer to have the area remain residentially zoned; eno urged the Board approve the Plan as r~co~end~d by the Planning Commission. Mr. Daniel ~tated ~hi~ particular ar~a, because of its proximity to Interstate 295, is of significant economic value to the County and that every major industry s~king a site in the COUnty thee has teen to~t ha9 been because cf no convenient access to the Airport and tha~ the subject acreage is a prime location for d~velo~ment. He ~tated he did not feel heavy industrial development was appropriate for the Meadowville Area but~ with modification to the veto Of a proposed land use by any one property owner in :he ~erkinson ~e£ghts area, he g~n~rally supported the Plan. Mr. Mayas indicated that no one had proven to him that the proposed Plan was not a guideline, the same aa other County F~s, therefore, all th,t was necessary was that the applicant comply with the guidelines~ that aa applicant could net, under the Constitution, be denied the right tc develop his property to the the hi~hest and best ume; and that, under the existing concept, he could support the Plan as reco~ended by the Planning c0mmi~sion. Mr. Applegute stated that certain elements o~ concern environmental protection issues, traffic volumes and congsstion, land u~x, etc.) must b= dealt with at the time of zoning, not tAro~gh the approval of a pxuDo~ed Land Use and T~a~portatien Pla~. When a~ked, Mr. Jecobson stated Comprehensive Plan is reviewed every five years. Mr. Applegat~ stated he felt there Were ~nffioient safeg~a~d~ within the Plan to protect the existing residential naighborhouds at this ti~e and that rezonings would ha¥~ to be dealt with on a ca~e by sase basis at the tLme of appl~sation but that some modifications to the Plan appeared justifiable. 90-400 519190 developing the Meadowville Plan was determined and aske~ that Mr. Gary McLaren, Director of Economic Development, explain_the impact of the suHjuct Plan on ~his area of the County. Mr. McLaren stated this t~act of land i~ Of major concern for future industrial development within the County and expressed concern that the Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission ia too specific ~eould preclude moms appropriate types of development in the area. Em further noted %ha~ access to the Airport/I-295 makes this tract of land unique and Valuable. Hm also commented that, while many believe ~he Meadowville Area would not develop for another 5 or lO years, he felt development co~l~ take place so0~r if the interchange at 1-295 ~r. Sullivan stated he ~elC the Plan should be more flexible and allow the possibility .of I-3 uses; that he agreed with the staff recommendation; expressed concern that future potential developments could be lost if tl%e ~lan were too r~strictive and that the County should not reduce'its options for development; that each rezoning application could be considered on a case by case bss~s; and commended those involved fur the diligent efforts and many manhoure they had expended on this Plan. Mr. Currin pointed cut properties on the map in which he did or did not have business interests; stated he had requested and received clarification from the Ataorney General's Office chat he could vote en the proposed Plan but no~ r~senings in this area that could be impacted by his ownership of property; addressed various aepeot~ of-the prcpo~md 9~an dealing wi~h use, o~en space, wetlands, height restrict~s, etc.; and stated he aqreed wi~h staff's recommendation for approval. ~e stated he had intended to mak~ a motion on the Plan at this hs would lik~ =o have th~ 0ppor=unity t0 again meet with those involved to f~rther discuss ~tated concern~ On mOtiOn of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. ~ay~s, the Buar~ deferred until Jun~ 13, 199Q consideration of the Meado~ilte ~rans~ortation Plan, which ~endment ~e6-ifically addresses aDp~o~a%%ly by CAe ~s R~vex, by North Enon Church Road~ by Eas~ Hundr%d Road and by Inter,tats-295. it was generally aqreeO to recess for ~ive (5) minutes. ~r. Sullivan requested that# due to the latene~ of the hour, the rules b~ suspended to uake out of sequence the nomination of the candidate for appointment to th~ School ~oaz~ ~rcm the Midl0thian District. 0n motion of Mr. Coffin, seconded by Mr, Appl~gate, the Board suspended i~s rnl~ to take out of sequence I~em 14.C., Nomination of Candidate for Appointment to the School Board from the Midlo~hian District. 90-401 14. NEW BUS'rNES.':; 14.C. NOMINATION OF' ~I'DA'rE FOR tPPOIN~I~i'I' TO 'a'lit; S~OOL BOA~D F~OM~H~ MIDLOTHI-~N DISTRICT Mr. Sullivan atatafl h~ ha~ met in~i~idually with all 0itiaen~ who had announced thum~lves as candidates for School Board representative fo~ t~ ~idlo~hian District, well as those individuals who wished to ~pe~k with h~m in favor that %he selection of on~ individual for this position was a vezy difficult decision, a~ he found all the candidates tO w~ll qualified, intelligent and highly-motivated. He expressed appreciation ~or the participation of all tho~e involved this process, ~ta~ed he had notified all the candidates earlier in the date via hand-dml~vered correspondence as to his decision and hoped that %hos~ no~ selec%e4 would be willing ~ezve on Other County boards and/o~ co~%~ees in the future. He nominated Mr, Timothy RrOWD for ~he School Board representa- tive for Midlothian District am he felt his selection best met Ther~ b~ing no further nominatiun~ for the School ~oar~ representative for the ~idlothian District, it wa~ on motion of ~r. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currln, that the nominations were Vo~e: Unanimous OR ~otio~ of Mr, S~llivan, seconded by Mr. Appl~gate, %he Board ~¢u% of Nr. Y~othy Brown to s~rve as the School Board repre- 0n motion o~ ~r. Sullivan, ~econd~d by Mr. Applegate, the Board s~ultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. Timothy ~rown %o nerve as the School Board r~pr~senta~ive for the ~idlothian Distriot~ whose term is effective July 1, 1998 an~ will ~xpire Sun~ 30, 19~4. Vote: unanimou~ Mr. Brown eNpre~sed appreciation for th~ honor bestowed upon him and stated he looked fo~ard with anticipation t~war~ working with members of the SchOol BOard and Board of 13. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continu~) 13.B. TO ~ONSIDERANO~DINANC~ TO/%M~ND T~E ~OD~ OF T~CO~ OF tu~ST~R~I~-n, 197~, A~ A~DED, EY ~ALI~G ~CTXON Y~'Jf]'§'R~L~TIN~ TO A LICENSE TAX ON DISTRIBUTING HOU~ZS Mr. Micas stated this date and t/~e had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to the County relating to a lic~nEe tax on d~strib~ti~g No One camo forward to speak in favor of or against the proposed ordinance. On motion o~ ~r. Appleqate, ~econded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board adopted the followin~ ordinance: - A~ ORDINA~C~ TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS kMENDED, ~Y ~EP~ALING SECTION 12-120 RELATING TO A LICENSE ~AX ON DISTRIBUTING HOUSES 90-402 5/9190 BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, =ha= Chapter I2 of the Code of the Connty of Chesterfield, 197~ as ~mended, is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 12~120, Reserve~.. Vete: Unanimous ~r. Applega=e requested that staff notify UkrOps and NAPA of action taken on the subject ordinanca. ~r. Micas noted the ordinance wo~ld be effective for the I991 tax year. 13.C. TO CONSIDER ANAMERD~T TO TW~- 1989-90 B~DGET TO ~PROP~.T.~TE $1~2S?~300 ~ m~ P~ OF I~SIN~ T~ ~C~L BO~ ~G~T ~r. ~e~aier st~ted ~hi~ dat~ and time had been advertised a public hearing to con~ider an ~endment to the 1989-90 There was no opposition for the additional funds; a li~%ing of ~ose items for which thm fu~d~ would be expended; maintaining of expenditur~ wi~in the o~iginal budget; a suggg~tion that th~ School Administration ~erfo~ quarterly reviews o~ th~ budget to avoid similar situations in the future; etc. 0n motion of Rt. Sullivan, ~e~onded by Mr. Applegate, ~h~ Board approved the appropriation of the approved but unappropriated Si,000,000 of %he budget transfer to schools which Wa~ withheld from the original' 1990.budget appropriation; appropriated the additional $207,300 in revenue and 9xpenditure r~visions for thm year ending June 30, I990 to cover the exp~nses related to an additional 207 enrolled ~tudents at Septe~er ~0. 1989, with th~ understan~inq that the additional $207,300 will be transferred only if it i~ n~d~; and approved ~he ~ollowing appropriation changes: a. Decrease S~aee Revenues by $L27~200; and Increase Federal Revenue~ by $297,300 for Impact Aid an~ Special Education ~. ~. 94-14]; and c. Increase other lo=al r~venum by 14. NEW BUSINESS [continued} 14.A...~, ~S? TO a~THO~2e HOA~D OF s~em~so~s TO ~y Mr. Daniel State~ he requested th~ Soard of Supervisors apply for a variance on behalf of Mr. Th~as Leafy because it has been d~iue4 that the building permit, issued to ~r. Leery by the County in 1986 to construct an addition %o his home, shoul~ DOt have been issued because the sub3uct addition encroaches on th% front~yard setback line and viola=es COunty's Zoning Ordinance. a~ ~tated Mr. Leafy did not create the non-complianc% ~ituaticn and said action would correct violation wki~h ~xi~s due to an error in th~ approval of a building permit. Mr. Mica~ explained ~ha% such ac%ion, although within the legal parameters of th~ Board, would be setting a precedent. On motion cf Mr. Daniel, ~econded by Mr. Ceftin, ~e Board approved the filing o~ an application by th~ Boar~ of 5/9/9~ Supervisors, for a ten (10} foot front-yard setback variance, with the Board of zoning Appeals On behalf o~ Mr. Thomas Leery and authorized payment of the $700 application fee from the General Fund in order to correct a 2oning Violation which exist~ due to an error in the approval of a building permit. ADOPT ON ~RGENCY BA~I~ AN ~ TO S~CTION 14.1-1 HEA~ING Mr. Mica~ ~i~fly ~ri~ed the request to adopt, on an emergency basis, an ozdlnance to amend the County Code relatlng to qh~ incOrpor~tion Of State motor vehicle laws into said Code and noted that, ~n accordance with State law, a public hea~ to ruadopt ~e ordinance must be held within sixty (60) days of the emergenoy adoption. ~o one c~e forward to speak in favor 0~ or opposition to the proposed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~econded by Mr. Daniel, qhe Board adopt~ ~e following ordinance on an emergency basis and set th~ date of Jun~ 1~ 1990 at 7~00 p,m., for a public h~aring to readop= an amendment =o Sectio~ 1~.1~1 of th~ Code o~ the County of Chesterfield, 197~, as am~nOe~, r~la%ing %o the incorporation of state Motor Vehicle Laws into the county Co~e~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE I, C~A~TER 14.1, OF T~E CODE OF T~E COUNTY OF CHESTSRFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDEb, BY AMENDING ~BC~IO~ 14.1-1 RELATING TO MOTOR VE~ICLES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County that the Code of ~he County of Chestmrfield, 1978, as amended, is a~nded by amendin~ section 14.1-1 as follows= See. 14.1r~..Adoption o~ ~at~ law. ~ursuant to ~he authority o~ Section 4~.2-13~3 Of tha~o~ ~, as amended, all of the provision and requirement of the laws of the state contained in Title 46.2 and Article 2 of Chaptmr 7 of Title 18~2 of the Cod~ of Virginia, as in force on May 9, t990~ except these previsions and requirements the violation of which constitutes a felony, and except those pro~isions and requirements which by their very nature eau have no application to or within th~ County, are hereby adopted an~ incorporated in this Chapter by reference and made applicable wikhin the County. References %o "highways of the state" contained in such provisions and requirements hsreby adopted public ways within the County. Such provisions and require- ments are hereby adopted, me,aris mutandis, and made a part of this Chapter as fully as though set forth at length he,sin, and it shall De unlawful for any person, within the County, to violate or fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any provision of Title 46.2 or Article 2 of Chapte~ 7 of Title 18.2 of Code of Virginia which is adopted by ~his Sec=ion; provided, that in no event shall the penalty imposed for the violation of impo~ed for a similar offense under Title 46.2 or Article 2 of chapt=r 7 of Title 1~.2 of the CQ~e of viz$inia. i i t 14.D. SET DAT~FOR~UBLICHEARINGTOCON~IIIEKT~ORK~RI~IIM Discussion and question~ ensued relative to ~he appropriaken~ Of act~oD ~t this time for setting ~ public hsari~g dat~ to con~ideT two referend~ ~estion~ for ~e Nove~er, 1~90 G~neral Election to amend the County Charter relating to impact ~orthern Virginia; the need for discussions with ~e County'~ L~gislators~ reactivation of the Gsowth Co~ittee; broad-based p~blic involvement; etc. On motion of M~. Applega=e, ~econded by ~r. sullivan, ~e ~oard did not set a date for a public hearing to conSi4er two r~f~rend~ ques=ions for th~ Norther, 1990 General ~t~c~ion to amend the County Charter: 1. Providinq for Charter authority for the Board of Supervisors 5o impose ~mDact fees on ~esidential development to fund capital needs cr~a~ed by residential 2. Providing ~ur the ability ~O accept cash proffers in the s~e fazhion a~ Northern Virginia. Ayes~ Mr. Cu~in~ Mr. Sullivan, Mr, Applega~e and ~r. Danist. ~stentiuu: ~r. ~ayes. 14,E. CONSENT ITEMS 14.B.1. STATE ROAD ACCEPT/INC~ This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with ~iroctions from this Boar~, made report in w~iting upon his examination of Coralborry Way, Monacan Hills, Section 4, Midiothian District. Upon consideration whersof, and on motion of Mr. ~pplegate, secnnded by ~r. Sullivan, it is r~$olved that Coralberry Wa~, Monacan Hills, ~ection 4, Midlothian District, b~ and it hereby is established as a public road. And b~ it further resolved, that the Virginia ~e~artment of Transportation, be and it hsreby is requested to taka into the Secondary System, Coyalberry Way, beginning at existinq Coral- berry Way, State Routs 3406, and going northeasterly 0.03 milo Thi~ r~quest is inctunivu of ~he adjacent alope~ sight distance and designated Virginia Dep&rt~%ent of Transportation drainage An~ be it further resolved, tha~ the B~rd of Supurvisors guarantees to the Virginia Deparem~nt of Transportation a 5O' right-of-way for this road. This sectiou of Monacan Hi:l~s i~ ~ooorded as follows: section 4. Plat Book 65, ~age 20, February 2, 1989. This day the County Environmental ~nginsar, in accordanoe with directions from this Soard~ made report in w~iting upon his ~aminaticn of Watercrest Road, W~fercrost Court an~ Watere~est Place in Wa%erQrost, Clover Hill DistriCt. 519/90 Upon consideration whnreof, and on motien of Mr. Apptegate, ~econded by Mr. Sullivan, it is resolved that Watercre~t Road, Waterongst Court an~ Watercres~ Place in Watercrest, Clover Hill District, be and they 5ereby ara established as public And bo it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into ~he Secondary System~ Watercre~t Road~ bcgiuning at the inter- section with woodlake Vil!~ge ~arkway, State Route number tQ bo assigned~ and going northerl~ ~.~4 mil~ to the intersection with Wa=orcrest Court, then continuing northerly 0.O5 milo, then turning and going easterly 0.Q4 mile to the intersection with Watercreet ~lace, ~hen Continuing ~asterly 0.05 mile, thou turning and going northerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Wa~erurest Court, buginnlng ut the intereectien with Watercrest Road end going eaete~ly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Watorur~st Place, ~eginning at the intersection with Watercrest Road and going northerly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage These roads serve 29 lots. And be it further re~olv~d~ that the BOard of guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' Waterorest is recorde~ a~ Plat ~ook 58, Pages 67 and 68, October 5, 19~7. 14.E.2. R~QU~STS F0a aI~O/~AFFI~ PE~4IT$ On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board approved requests for bingo/raffle permits from the following organizations ~cr calendar year 1998: ~ensley Athletic A~sociation Raffle Chester Jayc~s, Inc. Raffle Vote: Unan~ous 14.E.3. SET MAY 23, 199B PUBLIC ~EAIAING TO CONSIDER CONVEYANCE ~, INC. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, ~e sst the date of May 23, 1990, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hearing to consider the conveyance of an approximately 6+ acre parcel located on Whltepine Road, situated northwest ~ and ScanCenter at 8100 Whitepine Road, to Alfit ~erica, Inc. Vote= Unanimous m 14.F.1.a. TO CONSIdeR AN 01~INANCE TO VA~AT~ A ~HTION ~ of ~wa<~ore Drive wilhin Woo~ont Subdivision, Section A. On mo:ion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Appleg~t~, ~he Board o~ Swathmore D~ive, in Woo~ont Sub- division, ~ec~ion A, Midlothian District, Chester~ield~ Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof ~uly recorded in the Clerk's ~ield County in Plat Book 10, Page Mill~, have petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Woodmont Subdivision, Section A;-Bi,lothian District, Ch~ster- field County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of Comnty in ~l=t ~ook ]0, Page 37, made by J. K. Tin, ohs, Civil Engineer, dated April 8, I957. The portion of road petitioned fully Shown, on a plat by J. K. Civil Engineer, dated April 8, 1957, a copy of which is ~etached. ~E~, notice has been given pursuant ~o Section 15.1-431 of the Cod~ of Vi.~ginia, 1950, as amended~ adv~rtising~ and ~E~S, no publio necessity exis%~ for the continuance of the portion of road sOUght to be vacated. That pursuant to Section 15.1-48~{b) of ~e Code of aCCordance wi~h Section 15.1-482(b) oX the Code of Virginia, 1950, as ~en~ed, a~d a certified copy of %hi~ Ordinance, sooner than thirty days herza~ter in the Cler~'s office of the Circuit COurt of Chesterfield County, .V~rqinia pursuant Smction 1~.1-4S5 of the Code of Virqinia, 1950, as amended. ~ to destroy the force and ~ff~c% of the r~cording of portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest fee simple title ~o the cent~rline of the por=ion of road hereby vacated in ~e owner~ of ~ abutting lo=s within Wco~ont Subdivision, S~ction A, free and clear cf any right~ Of public 90-407 519190 Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indsxed in the names of the County of Chesterfield, as gran~or, .and Albert stuart, III and Eva A. Stuart, (husband and wifel, and Ste~en Mills, or their successors in tltls, as grantee. made by follows: EA~S IN %rIUTOR~A HILLS~ SECTIONS A ~ B Mr. Welchons stated this date and time had been adveztised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacaLa portions of alley easements in Victoria Hill~ subdivi~ion~ sections A and B. ~o one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter. On motion of ~r. Coffin, se¢on~sd by Mr. S~llivan~ the Doard adopted the following ordinance= AN ORDINANCE to vacate po~ti0ns of alley casements in Victoria ~ills, sections A a~d B Mutoaca ~agist=rial District, Chuster- field COUnty, virginia, as Shown on two plats thereof d~]y r~corded in the Clerk's Office of the circuit Court o~ Ch~stsr~ield County in Plat Books 12 and 13, ~aqes 47, 13 and 14, Respectively. W~EREAS, Glenn C. Shumate and Janet M. Shumate, petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate portions of alley easements in Victoria ~i115, ~ections A and B, Matoaca Magisterial District, chesterfield County~ Virginia more particularly shown on two plats oi record in the Clerk*s 0~ioe e~ the Circuit Court of Said CoUnty in Plat Bock 12, Page 47, dated February 15~ t961 and in Plat Book 13, Pages i3 and 14, dated August 17, J. K. Ti~mons, Civil Enqine~rs. The portions of petitioned to be vat=ted are mere fully d~scribed as A portion of ~ 16' alley easumcnt ac~oSs Lots 11-13 and an $' allay easement across Lots 7-10, Block B, victo~ia Hills Suhdi~i- sion, Section B, Matoaca District, chester- field, Virginia, as shown on a plat thersof by J. K. Timmuns, civil ~n~ineers. dated August t7, t962, and an 8' alley easement across Lots ~ and 6, Block B, Victoria ~ills Subdivision~ ~etlon A, ~a~oa~a Dis~ri~t~ Chesterfield, virginia, as shown on a plat thereof by J. K. Ti~ons, Civil ~nglne~rs, dated February 15, 1961, copies of which are attached hemeto and made a path of this Ordinance. WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-4~1 of the Cede of Virginia, 1950, as ~men0ed, by advertising; and That pursuant to Section 15.1-48](b) o~ the Code of Virginia, 19~0, as amended, the aforesaid aasemanLs and por~iun This Ordinance shall Be in ~ull force and effect in accordance with Sestion 15.1-4~2(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Gircuit Court Of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to section I~.1-485 of the Cod~ of Virginia, i990, as amended. The effeut of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to destro~ the fores and effect of the recording of portion of the plats vacated. This Ordinance shall ve~t f%e simple title of the easements and portion of easement hereby vacated in the property owuners of LOtS ?-13, Block B~ Victoria Eillu, Section B and Lots S and 6, Dlock B, Victoria Section A free and clear of any rights of public use. Accordingly, thi~ Qrdinance shall be indexed in th~ names of the County of Chesterfield, au grantor, and Claude J. Cooper and Chrieta M. Ceoper, (husband and wife), Calvin N. Hypes and Joyce A. ~ypes, (husband and wife), Richard P. Wooten and Frances R. Wcoten, {husband and wife), Warren E. Jessup and ~elen R. Jessup, (husband and wife}, ~iehael ~. McDonough, (hot, me sole), Elizabeth ~. Gardner, (~quitable separa%~ ~$tate), Sandra G. Cole, )~quitable separate estate), Richard Case, {hom~e sole}~ and Glenn C. Shumate and Janet Shumate, (huEband and wx~e], er ~heir successors in title, as grantee. 14.F.l.=. TO ~0N$IDER AN 0RDINANC~ TO %~ACATE A ~ION OF ~r. Welchons $~ated thi~ date and tim~ had been adverti$~ for a public bearing to consider an ordinance for ~e vacation of a ~or%ion of Bri~ktwood Avenue in Central Park S~divi~on. NO one c~e forward to speak in favor of or against ~e matteL. 0n motion of ~r. C~tin, s~cond~d by Mrl Sullivan, =he Board a~o~9~ the ~ollowing ordinance: AN ORDINANCE eo vaca=e a 9ortlon of Brightwood Avenue, in Central Park Subdivi=ion, ~ermuda District, Chester- field, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chester- field County in Plat Book 4t Pages 114 and 115. W~ASt Garland W. Phillips, ~r., Prances J. ~hilllps, and Tho~ ~. Se~zer~ Jr., hav~ petitioned the Board o~ Supervisors of Chesterfield County~ Virginia to vacat~ a portion of srigh~woo~ Avenue in Central Park Subdivi~ion, Be~uda District, Chesterfield County, Virginia more partlcularly sho~ on a plat of record in the Cl~rk's Offic~ of the Circuit Court of said Co~t~ in Plat BOOk 4, ~ages 114 and 115, made by J. T~Dle Waddill~ "~ated January lO, 19~. Tbs A portion of Brightwood Avenue which in located between Lot 13, sleek 4, and Lot 1~ Block 5, in Central Park is more felly shown, on a plat by J, T~]pl~ Waddi!l, dated January 10~ 192~, a copy of which is atSached. 519190 WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431 Of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising~ and WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continnaneo of the portion of road sought to be vacated. OF CHEST~I~VZ=LD COUNTY, VIRGINIA~ That pursuant ~o Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion ol read be and is hereby vacated. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in a¢o0rdancs wi~h ~ection 15.1-482(b] o~ the Code of Virginia, 1950, es amended, and a certified copy of this 0rdinan¢~ together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days h~feafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant Section 15.1-4S5 of the Cede of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The effect of this Ordinanc~ pursuant to Section 1~.t-483 is to destroy the ~orcs and effect of the recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance ~halI vest fee simple title ~o the centerline of the portion o~ road hereby vacated in the owners of the abntt~n~ lOtS within Central Park Subdivision, fr~e and clear of any rights of public Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the name~ of the County of Ch~seerfielO, as grantor, an~ ~arlan4 Phillips, Sr. and Yranoes J. PhilliDs, {husband and wife), and Thomas E. $~tzer, Jr., er their successors in title, as grantee. 14.F.l.d. TO CONSIDER x~ CONVEYANCE OW W~LL ~OTS X~ PaXSXC HIlL TO ANNA L. Mr. Wetshons stated this date and time had h~n advertised for a public hearing to conside~ the e0nveyance of well lets in Physic Hill to Ms. Anna L. Wilkinson. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter. On mo%ion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by ~rl Applegat~, the Board approved the conveyance o~ a portion of Lot 15, Block B, Section C, Lot 4, Block I, Section D and Lot 7~ Block Section E (well lot~), in Physic Hill to Ms. Anna L. Wilkinson, and authorix~d ~h~ Chairman of the Boar~ and County Adminlstra- A~terney's office. 14.F.2. ADOPTION OF ~ESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OP ~'~ I~I~40ND ~IRGINIA GRODNDWAT~R MANAGemEnT ARKA INT0 Mr. Sullivan noted that the Richmond Regional ~lsnning District Commission ha~ officially forwarded its concerns about the establishment o~ a single Groundwater Management Area to the State Water Control B0a~d; that the Regional Water Resources Ta~k Forc~ ha~ dot~rmined that a single ~roundw~ter ~anagement Area for Eastern Virginia was insufficient due %o modelling and data l~itat~snS and, ~$ a result of its findings, h~$ ~eeommondod that the State Water Control Board reconsider its action and divide the ~astern Virginia Greundwatar Management Area lute two separate areas for north and south of the James On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ,seconded by Mr~_App~egate, the. Board adopted the following ~'6iuti~:''='-' ....... RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE STATE WATER CONTROL :' BOARD TO DIVIDE TEE EASTERN VIRGINIA GR0~DWATEE MANAGEMENT INT0 TWO SEPARATE AREAS WHEREAS~ the State Water Contro~ ~oard has declared ~he ~stablishmsnt ef the Eastern Virginia GrOundwater Management Area~ said declaration becoming e~fectlve on DeCember 6, 1989, under the Administrative Process Act; and WHEREAS, the Eastern Virginia Groundwater ~anagement Area includes jurisdictions within the pr~viou$1~ declared Southeastern Virginia Groundwater Management Area and ll new j~ri~dic%ians north of =he Jar~es River~ including Charles City and New K~nt Counties and portions of Hanover, Henrico and Chesterfield Counties east of Interstate 957 and WHEREAS, the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission, upon the recommendation of its Regional Water Resources T~ek Force, officially forwarded its concerns about tho establishment of a single Groundwater Management Area to the State Water Con~rol Board during the publi~ c~mment period in a resolution adopted on May 6, 1998~ and ..... . WHEREAS, the Task Fores finds that the evidence presented by th~ state Water Control Board staff to justify the declara- tion of a single Groundwater Management Area for Eastern Virginia wac insufficient due to modelling and data limit~- tions~ and WHE~AS~ the Regional Water Resources Task P©r~e believes that a sinqle Groundwater ~an~gement Area for all of Eastern Virginia will place our jurisdiction and oth~r jurisdictions on the Peninsula a~ a severe handioaD in obtaining futura ground- water, d~e to the grandfather provisions oi the ~roundwa=er Act and the magnitude of permitted withdrawals in Southside Hampton Roads; and W~A~, the Task Fores finds that only substantive legislative shan~e~ in tho Groundwater Act will address the · ajcrity of these co,earns and, any such changes, will be politically difficult to effectuate; and W~=~AS, the Task Force in making its findings on February 22, 1990 recommends that %he ~ichmond Regional Planning Distr~ct commission request th~ State' Wate~ Con~ro~ Board to reconsider it~ action an~ declare two separate G~oundwater ~anaq~ent Areas for north and south of the James River. NOW, TME~FOR~ BE IT RESOLV~D, that the Chesterfield County Board of supervisors This 9th day of May, t99~ endorsee the recommendation of its Regional Water R~sources Task Force and dlrsst~ that a copy of this ~esOlution be forwarded to the State Water Control Beard and :o the Richmond Regional Planning District Cormuission. 5/9/90 AUTHOP-I2ATION TO ACQ:I~E EAS~q~NTB FOR T}~ ROUTE 1/301 SEWER A~$ESSM~NT DISq~LICT BY ~XNEN~ DOMAXN 14.F.B.b.1. HEIP~ OF CELEST~JONES Mr. W~lchons noted staff has been unable to locate the h~irs MS, Cele$%e Jonez, :he last owner e~ record, and since the contract for this project has been awarded, it iS neCesSary proceed with the uss o~ eminent domain on an emergency basis, as staff ~feel~ tb~ ~xten$io~ of this'sewer llne is necessary for the health and safety of the p~blic; however, staff ~ill continue to attempt to locate the heirs and negotiate a ~etttement. authorized the County Attorney =o exercise eminent ~omain, on an emergency ba~iz, for %h~ acquisition of a 28' sewer easem~n~ an~ 50' temporary construction easement the property of th~ heir~ of M~. Celeste Jones, County Tax Map NO. 116-2(1)4, ~ku estimated value of said easement being $989.0~ and which funds will be deposited with the Clerk of the Circuit Court after a h~aring to obtai~ right of ~ntxy. noted a copy o~ said plat is filed with %h~ papers of thi~ vote: Unanimou~ 14.F.3.b.2. HEIRS OF RLI~ARETH FLOOD Mr. Welchon~ noted ~taff ha~ be~n unable to 1ocat~ th~ h~ir~ of MS. Eliza~eth Flood, the last owner of record, and ~ince the sontract for thi~ project has b~en awarded, it i~ ~ec~$sary to proceed with the u~e of eminent domain On an emergency bs~ie~ for the health and ~afety of the p~blic: however, staff will continue to attempt to locate ~he heirs and negotiate a settlement. On mo{ion of ~r. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board authorized the Ccent~ Attorney to exercise eminent domain, on an emergency basim, f~r the acquisition of a 20' p~rmanent th~ prop~r~y Of th~ heirs of gllzebeth FlooO, County Tax Map No. 116-2(1)33~ the s~timated val~e of said easement being $914.00 and which fund~ will be depoEited with the Clerk of the Circuit Court after a hea~ing ~o ohtmin right of entry. (It i~ noted a copy of said plat is filed w~th tho pap~r~ of this Board.) 14.F.3.¢. A~PROVA~ OF OPTION FOR ~URCH~E OF ~LIGHT~0F-~AY ~ on motion of Mr. Daniel, seocnded bN Mr. snllivan, the ~oar~ approved ~n option for the purchase of right-of-way and Road inter~ection approximately 900 feet in a northerly dlre=tiun to the entrance to the auxiliary parking lot, from Mr. and Mrs. ~nry E. Myers, Jr.~ at a prie~ of $11,571.00; and authorized ~he County Administrator to sign thc ap~ion and ~he necessary deed. {It i~ no,ed ~ copy of ~aid plat i~ filed with the papers of ~his Board.) Vote: Unanimo~ 90-4t2 0n motion ~f ~z. D~ni~!, s~condad by Mr. Sullivan, the Board authorized %h~ County Atto~ney to proceed with ~e mss of eminan~ domain agains~ the following property owne~ if the further resolvsd that the Connty Administrator notify laid property Qwn,r~ by r~gi~tered mail on May 10, 1990 of the Cou~ty'~ intention ~o enter upon and take the property which is to be the subject of said mss of eminmnt domain. ~his action is on an emergency basis and bh~ County intends to i~ediate righ~ of entry, pursuant tc Section 1~.1-2~8.I o~ the Code of Vir inia, 1950, as amended. Charle~ W. and Linde C, B~ddow, TaX Map 95-8(1) $22~2%0~00 Howard S. and Dinda S. Marley, ' Parcel 5 Harold W., Jr. and Gall B, 14.F.4. CONSENT ITEMS 14oF.4.a. AP~0%rALOPWA~TEWATER~ONTTaaCTFOR ~0D~$MANOR On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~eoonded by Mr~ Mayes, the Board approved .the followinq wa~t~wate~ contract and authorized, the county Admini~a{6~'~0 ex~cu~ _.th~ '~Ce~sary d0cume~.tS~ ($S9-0666) M0dges Manor Off-sits Sewer Extension: Developer: Hedges Manor, Inc. Contractor: J. Steven Chafin, Inc. Contract ~onnt: Estimated Total - ·otal Zstimated County Cost: Wastewater {0ff~it~) {Refund thru conneotlon~) Code: {0ffsite) 5P-58350-89073B 14.F.4.b. APPROVAL O~ WASTE~AT~ C0~TRAC~ ~OR ~C~ A~' AUCTION, OPF-SITE On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by ~r. Mayes, the Board approved the following wastuwa%er contract and authorized the ($90-0027) Richmond Auto Auction - 0~f$1te Sewer: Contractor: Lyttle Utilities Contrast ~ount: E$=imat=d Total ~ Total Estimated County Cost: Wastewater (Additional Work) {Cash Refund) (Refund thru connection~) Code: {Additional Work) (Offsite) $62,100.00 $ 1,995.50. ' - $17~253,00 $42,851.50 ~P-57~40-$9$800E 5P~583S0-890733 90-413 14.F.4.c. CONV~YaNCE OF AN ZA$~ T0 '~'~ C~SAPKAKE k~D on mo~ion of M~. sullivan, seconded by M~. Mayer, the Board approved and authorized the Cha~r~aD of the Doard ~nd the County Adminiztratur to execute an easement agreement between Chesterfield County and The Chesapeake and ~otomac Telephone Company of Virginia to install buried cable within a 10' easement adjacent to Lori Road, which request is for a relocation in conjunction with the wideninq of Leri Road. (It is noted a copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) 14.F.4.d. CONVEYANCE OF AN KAZF/~T TO VIRGINIA ELECTP/CAND POWER COMPANYADJACENTTO~OI~I RO~D On moeion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Boa~d approved and authorized the Chai~an of th~ Board and th~ County AdmLnistrator to execute an easement agre~ent between Chesterfield County and Virginia Els=trio and Power C~pany to ins%all overhead cable within a 20' easement adjacent %o Lori Road, whioh request is for a relocacion in conjunotion with the wideninq of Lori Road, (I~ is noted a copy of said plat is 14.F.4.e. CONVEYANC~ OF AN EASEMENT TO ~IRGINIA ELECTRIC AND On motion of M~. Sullivan~ seconded b~ Mf~ Ma~es~ the ~oard approved mud authorized the Chef,an of the Roard and th~ County Administrator to execute an easement agreement between Chesterfield County a'~d Virginia ~lectric and Power Company to install overhead cable within a 30~ eas~ent ~djacent to Lucy Building. {It is noted a copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this ~oar~.) Vote: Unanimous 14,F,4.f. A~RROVAL TO TPu~NSFER APPROPRIATIONS FO~ P,~F~-~ fOR on motion cC Mr. Sullivan, seconded b~ Mr. Mayes, the ~oard transferred appropriations in the amounts of $8~,0~0 from water cash refunds (5H-hS350-89820OE) to water oversize through ¢~nneetion$ (5~-5~35Q-890732~} and $100,000 from wastewater off-site through connections (5P-58350-890733EI to wa~tewatsf oversize through connections 14.F.4.g. i%~PROV~ OF CK~/~GE ORDER NO. i FOR x~ [[PPER SWIFT CI~I~K P[I~P STATION on motion of Mr. Sullivan, seoonde~ b~ Mr. Mayas, the Board approved Change Order Nam]Der One, in the amount of $11,310.~0~ for Contract ~umber $5-7095, Part B - Upper Swift Creek Pump ~tation, Blakemore Construction Company, which project change includes a 9.? MCD pump station and rap-rap to stabilize the oreekbank of Little Tomahawk Creek; and authorized the County A~ministrator to execute any necessary documents for eai~ change order. (It is noted funds are available in ~he project allocation.) Vote: Unanimous I4.F.4.h. REQUEST PROM E.I. DUPON~ ~ CONSTRUCT NONITOP. ING WE~LS ~ TO COLLECT GROUNDWATER HA~PL~S AT T~ F~IN~ C~K ~S~A~R T~ P~ 0n mo~ion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr, M~y~, ~he ~oard approved a r~es~ from ~, I. DuPont, its agents or contractox~, for p~zmi~sion tu construct monitoring wells and to collec= groundwater s~les at the Falling Cr~k Wastewater Trea~en% Plant to investigate po~ible gxoundwat~r con~amination caused by Sp~ance Plant operaefons~ with the locations being subject to approval by Coun=y staff and subject to ~he ex~cution of a lion,se agreement. (It is no,ed a copy of said plat is filed with ~he papers cf this Boar~.} Vo%s: Unanimous 14.F.5. ~d~POP~TS water and s~w~r COntracts o~ecuted by the County Ad/~inistrator. 14.G. REPORTS Mr. Ramsay ~re~ented the Board with a Status report OD the General FUDd Contingency Account, ~eneral Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects,. Di~tFict Road and Street Light Funds, Leas~ Purchases, School Board Agenda and thc Board's Public Hearing Schedule and Dinner meeeing$ ee well as a Request to Set a Date ho Meet with the Richmond Hone Builders Association to Discuss Leqi~lation. It was generally agreed the Clerk would poll th~ ~oard to set a date to meet with members o~ the Richmond ~om~ Build~rs Association. Mr. Ramsay stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has formally notified the County of th~ a=ceptance of the following roads into the State Secon~ry System: ADDITIONS ~GTH ~SHTON WOODS NORTH - SECTION C (Effective 4/18/90) Route 4002 (Peach Grove Road) - ~rom U.04 mile South Route 4003 to Route 4805. 0.03'Mi. Route 4004 P]e&~ant Ridge Road) - From 0.08 mile South ~uneet Knoll Road to Route ~005. 0.04 Mi. Route 4005 white Pickett Lane) ~ From 0.06 mile East Route 4904 to 0.07 mi~e North Route 4007. 0.34 Mi. Route 4006 White Pickett Court) - Prom Koute 400~ to 0.03 mile Southwest Route 4005~ 0,03 ~i. Route ~007 White ~ickett Circle} - From Route 4005 to 0.04 mile Northeamt Route 400~. 0.04 Mi. Route 4008 Merdith Hill Tmrrac~) - From Route 4005 to 0.0~ nile South Route 4005. 0,0~ Mi. PERNBROOK-CMATHAM GROVE SECTION, P~ASP II FMRNBRGOK - SECTION D {~ffecPive 4/17/9%'} Route 3245 (Cha=ham Grove Lane) ~ From 0.01 mil~ Wa~t Route 3247 to 0.IS mile Northwest Route 4442. 0.40 Mi. 90-415 5/9190 FERNBROOK-CNATHAM GROVE E~CTIO~, PEASE IT a Iii: FE~BROOE - SECTION D (Effective '~/17/90) (continued) Route 444~"(~nd Place) - From Route 3245 to 0.08 male Northwest Route 4441. Route 4441 (Carriage House Court) - From Rout~ 4440 to D,0~ mile SouTh Route 4440. ROUte 4442 {~orsetail Lane) - From Route 3245 to Route 324t. ~GTH 0.17 Mi. 0.03 Mi. 0.06 Mi. 8~RING TRACE - SECTION k (Effective 4/17/90) ROUt~ 4715 (Master Stag Drive) - From 0.05 mile East Route 4713 to 0.09 mile East Route 4717. Route 4717 {whistler's cove Drive) - From Route 4715 to 0.05 mil~ North Ro~t~ 4718. Route 4718 (Littl~ Horn Ridge) - From Route 4717 to Route 4719. Route 4719 (Pointer Ridge Road] - From 0.01 mile North Rou~e ~7~8 to 0.07 mile South Route 47I@. 0.13 Mi. 0.t2 Mi. 0.18 Mi. 0.08 Mi. ROXSRIRE - SRCTION 10 (Effective 4/26/90) Route 4171 (olde Queen Terrace) - From Route 4178 to 0.t5 mile South Route &179. Route 4174 (Swanherst Drive] - From Route 417~ to 0.06 mil~ South Rou=e 4176. Route 4176 (Edgeview Lane) - From 0.31 mile South Route 4170 ~o Route 4174. Route 4177 (NormandstOne Drive) - Prom Rout~ 4176 to O.l~ mile South Route 4176. Routs 417~ (Swanhuret Circle) - From Route 4174 to 0.05 mile West Rout~ 41g~. Ront~ 4179 (Otto Queen Court) - ~rom Route 4171 to 0.05 mile East Route 4171. 0.~6 Mi, 0. ~0 Mi. 0.13 Mi. 0.I8 Mi. 0.05 Mi. ADDITIOE (Effective 4/16/90) Route 872 (Chestnut Hill Road) - From Route lO to 0.~ mile North Route 10. 0.t2 Mi. 15. ADOOORN~ On motion of Mr. Applegate, ~econded by Mr. Coffin, the 5card adjourn~ at 12=45 a.m. (DST) on ~a~ 10, 1990 until 9~00 a.m. (DST) on May 23, 1990. Vote: Unanimoum COunty Adminiutrutor 90-416 ~. F.~c~rrin, Chairman 5/9190 m