06-13-90 MinutesMr. C. F. Curt±n, ~r., Chairman
Mr. M. B. Sullivan, Vice Chairman
Mr. ~. R. Applegate
Mr. Harry 6. Daniel
M~ 3essa 3~ May~
Mr. Lane B. Ramsay
County A~ini~trator
St~ff in Attendance:
Ms. Amy Davis, Exec.
Asst. to Co. Admin.
Mrs. Doris De,art,
Asst. CO, A~min.,
Leafs. Svcs. and
Intergovern. Affairs
Ms. Joan Dolsmal,
Clerk to ~he Board
Chis~ Robert ~anes~
Fire DepartMent
Hr. Bradford $. ~ammer,
Deputy CO. Ad, in.,
Management Services
Mr. William H. Howell~
Dir., Gen.
MS. Mary Leu Lyle,
Dir. cf Accounting
Mr. Roher~ Ma~den~
Deputy Co. Admin.,
~uman Services
Mr. R. J, M¢Cracken,
Transp. Director
Mr. Richard McElfish,
Dir. of Env. Eng.
Mr. ~tsve Micas, CO.
Attorney
Mrm. Pauline Mitchell,
Dir. of News/Info.
Services
Dr. William Nelson,
Dir., Health Dept.
~r. William D. Pool~,
Chief, Development
Review, Planning Dept.
Mr. Richard Sale~
Deputy CO. Admin.,
Development
Mr. Jay Stegmai~r,
Dir. of Budge~
Mr. M. D. Stith,
Dir. of Pazk~ ~ Rec,
Mr. ~avid Welchons,
Dir. ~ Utiliei~s
Mr. Frederick
Dir. of Human
Resource Management
Mr. Currin called the work sem$i~n to order at 1;00 p.m. (DST)
in the Wagner Building Conference ~oom. (It is no%ed waivers
w~re ~iqn~d calling the meeting at this time+)
1. WORK SESSIONS
1.A. NETROi~LITAN ~OALITION AGAINST DRUGS
Mr. Ma~den introduced Dr. David Saunders, Executive Director of
the Metrupclitan Coalition Against Drug~; Mr, Robert M.
$~tkowski, ~p~cial Agent in Charge of the Richmond Office of
the Federal Bureau o~ Invastlgati~n: and Dr. Gordon ~rlor,
President of the Greater Richmond Informed Parents A~Oclation
objectives for the Netro area and outlined local go¥~rnments'
role in coalition activities. (It is noted copies of the
Co=lition'~ draft organization ~tructur~ and data on a housing
area selected for concentrated efforts to ~eliorate the
impacts of drug distribution and use were submitted to the
~oard for their perusal.)
Discussion, questions and oomm~nt~ ensued relative to the
organization's goals and objecCivss~ the roles and
responsibilities of the media, family and co~t~uaity, local
goverrunent, industry, church, schools, law enforcement and
treatment pregr~m~ in educating the co~n~nity about drug
distribution and use; the combining of the many organizations
already established to evaluate/a~sese the drug problems ta the
community;' the serrelation of dru~ distribution and use to
increase~ in crime and murders; the economic impact on the
community of drug problems; etc.
The Board expressed appreciation for the information provided~
acknowledged that serious drug probl~m~ ~xi~t~ add stated that
they would do whatever they could to assist when called open.
1.~. CHEHAPEAK~ ~AY ~X~SE~rATION ACT
Mr. Jeffrey L. Mincks, Senior County AttOrney, explained
text o~ Or~na~ce~ I and II pertaining to the requirements of
the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, scheduling, and timing
constraints; the adoption of the criteria of the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act in oonjunctlon with the Upper Swift CreeR
Plan; the deci~ion~ the Board will be requi~ed to render and
the timefr~e within which those decisions must be made; etc.
Discussion, questions and con, ants ensued relative tn
regulations adopted by the State to the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act requiring localities to designate resource
protection areas and resource management areas; the
~xc~ptlon$ ~u the ordinancm$; pr~-4evelopment
po~t-developmen~ r~qufrem~nts; phosphorus and/or lead
r~ifiea%iOhs of ~a~ping and correlation to the County's
mapping system; staffing level~ ~o handle the workload
gan=re%ed by these requirements; ~plementation dates; etc.
After further discussion, it was generally agreed ~ff would
~rovide %he Board with color-coded maps of each member's
district indica~in~ Magisterial Di~%ri¢~ boundaries~ ~hat
coa~ideratlon be giv=n ~o =he establishment of a c~ittee
r~co~endations on an on-going basis but that ~aid
chairman of the Board of Supervisor~ had had the opportunity t0
m~ut with tho Chairman of the ~!annlng C~ission t0 discuss
the ma~er~ etc.
R~cenvening:
Mr. Sale presented a s~mmary .of. the Chesapeake Bay Preserver±on
Act Ordinances I and II and outlined provisien~ designating the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas (CBPA~) and explained the
data relative to the adoption 'of the performance criteria to
preserve water quality.
After further discussion, it wa~ generally agreed ~e refer
Ordinances ~ and II of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act to
90-45~ 6/13/90
the Planning Commission for review and consideration,
he.rings and r~con~endations to the Board.
It was generally agreed to recess for five (5)
pablic
Due to a previou~ c0~it~ent, Mr. Applegate excused
item the meeting.
1.C. 1990 GEl{BP. AT. A~4B~V
Mr. MiCaS and Mrs. ~e~art pre,anted and briefly ~xplained ~ach
program item of the proposed draft 1990 General Assembly
Legislation affecting County business ~equiring £urther action
by %he Board, ere. (A sopy of said Legislative Program is
filed with the papera of this Board.)
Mr. Currin excused himself from the meeting.
~rior to discussion of Boule Bill 1055 relating to adoption of
the Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act, Mr. Daniel diacloaed to the
Board that since he is e~ploye~ by ~hilip ~orri~, ~nc., he did
not feel he should participate in ~he discussion, declared a
potential eonflic~ of interest pursuant ~o the Virginia
Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from
the table but did not leave the m~e~ing,
It was generally agreed to defer discussion of Eouse Bill 1055
until June 2?, 1~90 as there was not a full Board present.
Upon conclusion of di$oussion of acute ~ill 10~$, Mr. Daniel
retarned to the table.
After discussion, Mr. Daniel rsq~e~te~, and the Boa~d generally
agrssd, that the following specific ~ouse/Senate bills dealing
with recyclin~ i~ues he forwarded tO ~he Solid WaSte Ta~k
Force/Recycling Con~ittee for review/study for a positive plan
reco~endation an~ that ~ oomprehen~ive recycling package be
brought fo/ward to the full Board within sixty (60) da~s:
KB 940 - adoption of an ordinance requiring all solid
waste generated within the County be
for the p~rpe~e of ~eeycling;
9B 136 - adoption of an ordinance r~quiring busineSSeS
operated for profit to =eparat~ materials for
recycling;
BB543/~B447 - adoption of an ordinance requiring all
non-residential solid waste generators and
companie~ which manage ~olid waste or recycled
materials to report information regarding said
materials;
di~poeal of grass clippings er leaves in
- adoption of an ordinance requiring disposal of
trash in proper receptacles;
HB882 - adoption of procurement policiea stating a
price differential dOeS not exceed 10% of the
lowest bid price.
i
Mr. Currin re=urned ~o ~he meeting.
m
m
Discussion eontlnued o~ other legisla:ive items and the Board
instructed ~taff t0 t~k~ appropriate action on the following:
EB1055 - adoption ~f the Virginia Indoor Clean Air ACT be
deferred for further consideration until June
27, 1990;
HB946 ~ amendment of the requirement that a child be
five ~$) years of age on sepeember 30 of th~
school year to be eligible to enro!l in the
kindergarten program he referred to th~'S¢'hool
Board for information relative to costs;
H~37 - information on the fiscal effects be brought
forward to the Board prior to the public hearing
regarding The expanded income and net worth
limita~f~n ~enerally applicable in northern
Virginia To Cheste~Iiel~ fo? tax relief for ~he
elderly and disabled;
~B900/SB32S - further study regarding the authorization the
County ~o adopt a p~oqram allowing taxpayers to
defer tho portion of their real e~tatG that
exceeds 105% above the tax for the p~eceding
yCar~ and
- that an interpretation be provided of the
wor~ing "meparately~' in th~ te~ of HM938 which
requires that public hearings on %ha proposed
property tax increase on real estat~ b~ more
than 1% ever the previous year must be held
separately from ~he local budget h%azing.
And further, th~ Board generally ag~d that each item
discussed, wi~h the exceptio~ 0£ :hose on which it wa~
determined no action would be taken~ were specifically agreed
upon by the Board of Supervisors as the L=gisla~ive Packet.
I.D. CfR',~I'/"I'EEON '~n~UTUK~ 2.
Introd~ctlons were made of the members ~f the Co~i~ee ~n th~
Future and copies of an annual f~por~ outlining Ehe progress
that th~ Co~ittee ha~ ma~e and .plane ~or the futur~
distributed.
M~. Carolyn Lowenthal, S~ate~ic Planning Analyst, presented
~ary of the Co~it~ee's profilu on =he County which included
data regarding curr~nt population, projected population,
average annual growth, median househol~ incom~, school
enrollment, pupil/teacher ratio, job~ by category, etc.
~r. A. Paul Cox, Jr. Chai~an of ~h~ Co~ittee on the Future,
eta=ed the projections, a~ ~escribed by Ms. Lowenthal, will
have a ma~or impact on th~ citiz~n~' needs of the luau=e; that
the task of the Co--lites ~ill be tu provide an innovative
approach %o invelving the public in ~he long range planning
wi=h par=icular expertise in the development of formats for
citizens meetings and other opportunities fQ~ public input; and
for their d~dicated an~ d~liqent ~ffOrt~ on ~is difficult
task; encouraged th~ Co~ittee ~o select th~ best consultant
services possible to a~i~t them in their endeavor for the
funding available; and indicated %he Board would be willing to
consider their need~ in the ~uture if necessary.
There being n0 ~urther bu~in~ to discuss, She work session
was concluded and members of ~e Board of Supervisors and the
Co~ittee on the Fu~ur~ r~cessed for dinner at ~:~0 p.m. (D~T).
90-461 6/I3/90
3. INVOCATION
Mr. Currin introduced Mr. ~illard D. "Pete" Stith, Director of
Parks and Recreation, who gave the iDvoeation.
4. P~EDGE OF ALLEGIAN~ TO T~ FLAG OF x~ ~NITED STA~ES OF
Members of Boy Scout Troop 988 l~d the Pledge of Allegiance to
5. AP~RO%~ALOFM~T~S
On ~atio~ of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. ~uyes,
approved the minutes of May 23, 1990, as submitted,
Vote~ Unanimous
the Board
6. CO~/~I"~AO~INISTRATO~'S
Mr. Bradford Ha~er, Deputy County Adr~inistratcr, stated ~r.
Ramsey, County Administrator, was absent a~tending his
daughter's graduation from Matoaca ~igh School; congratulated
her and all stnd~n~s from the other Chesterfield county
who w~r~ graduating %h~s
Mr. ~aniel reporte~ he a~tended the Capital Regional Airport
Cc~i~sion (C~C) meeting at which it was reported passenger
enplanemen~s and cargo ~raffic continue t0 increase; and
represented the Richmond Regional Planning Di~%rict Co,lesion
{~DC) a= ~he National Associauion of aegional Councils
meeting in san Francisco, California, at which transportation
issues and funding were of primary concern.
~velopmen% Corporation (ABIDC0) meeting at which there were
di~cussion~ regarding the newly ~stablish~d Advisory Co~ncil
said organization; the Crater Development Company at which new
officer~ ~ere elected; and the Crater Planning Development
C~isslon (CPDC) m~etlnq at which h~ wa~ ~l~c%~d Cha~an for
a one year term.
Mr. Sullivan briefly cemented on ~ecent per~onaI events
involving his ~on which he stated is a tragedy in his family's
life; stated thei~ leve for ~eir son is unconditional ands
while the ac~s of which he is accused are absolutely
~y$%~m and knO~ that fairness and justice will prevail;
expressed sincere appreciation, on behalf of his f~ily, to all
individuals wi~in the county and $urrounding area~ for their
concern, support and prayers.
Mr. Currln reported he and Mr. Sullivan attended a
conference~ in ~ortland~ ozegon~ regarding financing gover~en=
services associated with population growth, ~ponsored by the
Gover~ent Finance Officers Association, the ~erican Planning
ASsociatiOn Of ~Ome B~ilder~; the Lincoln Institut~ Of Land
il
participated in the graduation ceremonies of ninety-seven
CH~/~GES IN T~ ORDER OF PRE$~mxATION
There being no cha~ges to the agenda, on motion of Mr. Daniel,
~econded by Mr. Sullivant the Board adopted the agenda, as
submitted.
9. REsell]TIeRS A~D SPECIAL P. ECOGNITIONS
9.A, MR. J~PFP~Y ~.. CRIBBS, CH~LI~N 0~' T~ CltESTEI~FTFr.~
COUNTX SCHOOL BOA.~D AND MIDDOTHIANNAGISTFJ~IAL ~ISTRICT
R~P~ESENTATIVI~
On motion of the Board, th~ following resolution was adopt~dx
W~Pd~AS, Mr. Jeffrey ~. Cribbs has s~rv~d ~ ths
~i~lothian District Representative on ~he Chesterfield Courtly
School Board since 1982, after many y~ar~ Of p~rticipa~ion as a
State PTA Board Member and as an active ~ember of the Chester~
fi~Id County PTA's; and
W~EREAS, Mr. Cribbs is complet~Dg his second term on the
School Board, was the representative to ~e Regional Math
Chairman ~ the School ~card and was its Chairman in 1989 and
199Q; and
WE~REAS, Mr. Crlbbs has ~erv~d diligently and sincerely,
helping to guide the Chesterfield County Public School S~stem
in 1982 to 42,878 today, ~rom 40 schools in 1982 to the present
48 ~chool~, from a budget of $77.~ milllon in I982 to a 1990
budget of $216.3 million; and
new ~l~m~ntary ~QhQQlS, one new middle school an~ two n~w high
schools currently in the planning or construction stages.
NOW~ THEREFO~ BE IT ~SOL~D, that the Chesterfield
County Doard of SuDervisors does heruby co,end and'thank Mr.
Jef~ra~ S. Cribbs for hi~ lengthy nnd d~dicated public service
Vote: Unanimous
Cribbs at a June 26, 1990 ~chool Boar~ r~ception in his honor.
9.B. BOy ~OUTS ATTAINING ~%RK OF~AGL~..SCO~T
9.~.1. ~. JAM~S N APX~
On motion o~ the Board, the ~ollewinq re~olution was adopted:
W~EREAS, The Boy Sco~t~ of America was incorporated by Mr.
~ill£sm D. Bcyce on February ~, 1910~ an6
WI{~REA$, The Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship tr&ining~ personal development and fitne~n of
individuals; end
90-463
6/~3/~0
W~A$, After Earning a% least twenty-one msrit badges in
a wide variet~ of fi~ld~, ~erving in a leadership position in a
'troop, carrylng out a sarviae project beneficial to his
co~mnity, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout
spirit and living up to the Scout 0a=h and ~aw; and
WH~P~AS~ Mr. James Napisr, St. Auguetine's Catholic
Church, Troop 888, has accomplished those high $t~ndards of
coauai~]ent and has reached the long-~ought goal of Eagle Scant
which i~ ~celv~d by less than two peru~nt of ~kose individuals
entering th~ Scouting movement; and
W~ER~AS, Growing through hie experiences in Scouting,
learning %he le$~ons o~ responsible aikizenshlp and priding
himself on the great accomplishments of his County, James is
of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, TMEREFORE BE IT ~MOLVED, that %he Chesterfield
County Board ~f S~pexvisors hmreby sxtmnds its congratulations
to Mr. J~em Napie~ and acknowledges the good fortune of the
Vote: Unanimous
9.B.2. ~R. CHP~STOPH~R ~. CST
O~ ~otien cf the ~oard, the following resolution was adopted:
WE~REAS, The Boy SCOUts of A~erica was incorporated by
Mr. William D. Boyce on February ~, 19IO; and
~ERFA$, The Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenshiD training, personal development and fitness of
individuals; and
a wide variety of fields, Serving in a leadership position in
troop, carrying out a servic~ ~rojsct benefluial to his
co~un~%y, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout
spiri= and living u9 to the Scout Oath and Law; and
Church, Troop 888, has accomplished those high standards
which is received by less than two percent of tho~
enterinq th6 Scouting mo~ement~ and
~E~AS, Growing ~rough hi~ experience~ in Scouting,
himself on %he great aCCOmplishments of his County~ Christopher
citizens of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THER~FORE BE IT ~SOLVED, %hat th~
to Mr. Christopher M. O~% an~ acknowledges th~ good fatten%
the County tO have such an outstanding young man as one of
vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel presented =~e executed resolutions to Mr. Napier and
Mr. 0st and co~ended them ~or their outstanding achievements.
h~arln9$ of citizens on unscheduled matters or
11. DEFERRED ITEMS
11 .A. PUBLIC ~AI~NG TO CON~ID~R THE MRAI~DW~iLLH ~, AN
AMENDMENT TO T~ ~ASTE~N i%~EA LAND USE AND TRANSP0~TATIO~
PLAN, AN
AND TRANS~OR~ATION I$$UE.~ WITHIN T~3~ AREA ROOND~D
A~PROXI~ATEL] BY T~ J~M~$ P,J.v.~l'le BY NO~ ~ON
Mr. Currin stated he, Mr. Tom Jacobson and Mr, BAll PQole have
met on several occasions with ~e citizens of th~ Meadowville
arear particularly Mount Blanco, to discuss the proposed
length, reached what they feel is a reasonable compromise;
however, due to ~e most rscent me,ting having transpired only
two days prior to th~ re~larly ~cheduled ~oard meeting,
d~veloper$ as well as the citizens involved feel they would
like to have the plan in a written form for their review prior
to ~he 9ropo9al being presented to the Board for consideration.
He stated the groups involved hav~ requested that %h~
deferred ~ntil J~ly 25, 1990 at 9:00
On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
deferred until July 25, 1990, at 9:00 a.m., the public hearing
to consider the Meado~ille Plan an ~endmant %0 the Eastern
Area Land Uae and TranspOrtation Plea, an element of the
Chesterfield County Comprehensive Plan, which amendment
within the area bounded approximately b~. the J~e~ River, by
North =non Church. Road, by East Hundred Road, and by
Highway 295.
Vote: unanimous
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
appointed/reappeinted th~ following persons to serve on the
Camp BakEr ~ana~ement ~eard, whose tarm~ a~o effective
i~mediately and e~plre April 30, 199~:
1. J~es L~pkin (raappcin~nt) Dale bi~rlc~
2. M~. ROb~r~ M. S=allworth (appoin~ent) Midlothian District
3. ~s. Janic~ Mack (appoin~ent) ~atoaca District
4. ~r. Alfred ~. Slko {reappoin.~ent) Richmond Area Retarded
Citizens Association
Vole: Unanimous
12. PUBLIC HEAliNGS
12.A. TO CONSIDE~ TH~ PROHIBITION OF ANY TR~CK OR TRUCK
DRIVE, STATE I~OWI~ 1913, AND O~ ~D~TING~P~EK DRIVE~
STATE ~ 19{3 ~Z~ ND ~ ~ C~CH
~ R~ ~u'r~ 642
Mr. Sale ~%ated this date and t~e had bee~ adv~rtis~ for a
public hearing to consider the prohibition of through truck
traffic from u~ing ~itepin~ Road, State .Route 701, from
Ironbridge Road, State Rou:e 10, to Huntingcreek Drive, State
Route 1913, and on Huntingcr~ek Drive, Stat~ Route 1913, from
Whitepine Road to Salem Church ~oad, State Route 642.
6/13/9o
Mrs. Robbie Benson addressed concerns regarding the increased
truck %raffle in %h~ ar~a; the type of heavy construction
equipment being transported through the area; speeding; noise;
ana lie=sting of the neighborhood by said vehicles as they are
not covered; referenced a letter she had written Mr.
ReymoI4 of the Department of Trans~orta=ion; ~xpseesed concern
for the ~afet~ and welfare of chiLdrEn in the area7 and voiced
support for the restriction of through truck traffic on
Whitepine Road and Hunting6reek Drive.
There was'~A Oppos. ition present.
restriction of traffic on these roads; presented a brie~
background hi,tory of the development of Ironbrldge Bark and
the funding of the road; indicated that at no time we~ it ever
intended that this road be used a~ a collector/distributor road
for any movement of traffic; expressed that~ with the
tremendous activity ongoing in the p~rk as well as the negative
impact that thr0~g~ truck traffic cause~ to the ~ubdivision, he
felt it necessary to convey the area residents concerns to the
Virginia Depart_men= of Transportation for ac%ion as soon as
possible.
On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Appleg~e, the ~oard
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS~ The Chesterfield County ~oard of Supexvisors has
received requests from citizens ~o restrict through truck
traffic on Whttepine Road, State Route 701, from Ironbridge
Road, State Route 10, to Huntingcresk Drive, State Route 1913,
and on Huntingcreek Drive from Whitep±ne Road to Salem Church
Road, state Route 642, by any truck or truck and trailer or
semi-trailer combination except pickup or panel trucks; and
krHEREAS, Th~ Board ha~ conducted a p~lic hearing on the
question.
NOW~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED~ that the Board of
Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Traasportatlon
to restrict through truck traffic on Whitepine Road from
Ironbridge Road to Huntingcrsek Drive and un Huntingcrssk Drive
from Whitepine Road to Salem Church Road.
OF CHES'r~FIELD, 1978. AS ~d~ENDED, BY ;~NDING SRCTION
20-42.1 OF 'a'n~ WA~ ~ND ~ OI~D1/~ANCE I~ELATING TO TI~
FOR R~UIRED P~MENT FOR COST OF ~AT~R LINE ~NSTALLATION
Mr. Sal~ =tared this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to emend the Code of
~i~'" f~ require~ payment for the cost of water line
installation. He briefly explained the curr~nt ordiD~pce and
stated that since th= Utilitie~ Dep~rtm~ut administer~ section
20-42.1 but is no= responsible for the issuance of building
permit~, ~taff b~tieve~ that thi~ ordinance cannot properly be
a~minietersd if ~ha payments are tied =o the issuance of
building permits and is requesting ~eid amendment to provide
that develope/s make the required payment a~ ~he time of
Eubmission of the final check plat for the subdivision, when
bonds ~or utility improvements are posted.
Ne one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
proposed ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
adopted the following ordinanoe~
m
Section 20-42.1 Required payment for w~ lines.
Payment sufficient %o cover the estimated cost
of water lin~ installation shall be madm
the County at the time of submission of
final check plat for any subdivision
within two (21 miles of an existing water line,
ox witkin two (2) miles of a subdivision
will use public water, when lots in the
proposed subdivision have an area greater than
one (1) acre but less than five (5) anre$~ The
paymsnt made under this Section shall ha used
solely for the inmtallati0n cf water lines in the
purpose of sal~ or qift tea member of the lot
owner's is~e~ia~e f~mily shall 5e exempt ~rom
the~ requirements.
Vote: Una~imcus
12.C. TO CONSIDE~AN O~lq,~%N~ TOAM~D ARTIC/~ I, CHA~TER
14.1, OF ~ CODE OF TH~ COUNTY OF CHIESTEHIvI~T.m, 1978, ~
~ BY~IN~ ~ ,14.1-I ~TI~R
Mr. Micam mtmted thim date and time had been advertig~d for
public hearing to consider an ordinance to ~end the Code of
the County o~ Chester~ield, 1978, am ~nd~d, ~elatlng ~o mQ~o~
vehicles. He noted ~is ordinance was adopted on an emmrgency
basis at the May 9, 1990 Board m~tlng ~nd in or,er to comply
with State law must be readopted at thim time.
proposed oxdinance.
On ~otion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the
adopt=~ ~he ~otlowing ordinance on a permanent basis;
~ O~I~CE ~ ~ ~IC~ I, C~R 14.1,
~ ~ED, BY ~ING SECTION
BE IT 0~AI~ED by ~he Boa~d of ~upe~isor~ of Chesterfield
County that the Coda oi thc County of Chesterfield, 1978,
~ended, i~ amended by ~ending Soo=ion 14.~-1 a~
Sec. 14.1-1. Adoption of St=to law.
Pursuant to eke authority of S~ction 46.2~1313 of th~ Code
of Virqin~a, a~ ~ended, all of the pro~ision and
of ~e laws of ~he S~a~e contained in Title 46.2 and Article 2
of Chapter 7 0f Title t8.2 of the Code of Virqlaia, as in force
on May 9, 1990, except those ~rovi~iom~ and requirements
violation of which constitut~ ~ felony, and except
no application ~o or ~ithln ~e County, ars hereby ~op~d and
incorporated in this Chapter by reference and mad~ applicable
within the County, Referenee~ to "hlgbways of ~e
contained in such provisions and requirements hereby adopted
shall be deemed to refer %o th~ Str~ut~, highways and
ments are hereby adop%~d~ mutati$ ~u%andls, and mad~ a part
this Chapter as fully aa tho~qh ~e~ forth at length herein, and
it shall be unlawful for any person, within the Coon=y,
violate or fail, neqlect or refu~e t0 comply ~ith any p~ovision
of Titls 46.2 or A:ticl~ 2 of ChaDtsr 7 of Title 15.2 of the
Code of Virginia which is adopted by thi~ Section; provided,
thaC in no event shall the penal~y imposed for the violation
any provision or requir~ent h~r~by adopted exceed %h~ p~ualty
90-46? 6/13/90
imposed for a similar offense under Title 46.2 or Article 2 of
Chapter 7 of Titl~ 18.2 of the Code of Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
12.D. T~ CONSIDER AE ORDXHANCE TO ~ SECTT(DI 15.1-22 OF T~m
ADDING ~'~N~' 'S~fON--I~-i~22.5 ~.%TING TO MUZZLE-LOADING
Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, 197~, as amended relating to
mnzsle-1oading rifles.
Mr. Denny Quaiff, representing the virginia Dear Hunters
introduced Captain E~rb Fo~t~r, ~unting Safety Coordinator,
Department endorses any County wishing to enc0~rag~ th~ uso of
such firearms during hunting season. There was no opposition
present.
On motion of Mr. kpplegate, seconded by ~r. Sullivan~ the Boord
adopted the following ordinance:
AN~I~DINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 15.1-22
AS ~ED~ BY ~D~G A ~ S~TION 15.1-22.5
BE IT O~AINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
COunty that the Cod= of the Count~ of Cheuterfieldt 1978t as
~ended, is ~ended by adding a new Section 15.1-22.~ as
follows:
Sac. 15.1-22.5. Muzzle Loading Rifted.
(a} It shall b~ unlawful for any p~r~on to hunt deer with
a rifle of any caliber excsDt for a muzzle-loading rifle ~uring
the special muzzle-lbading ~ea~on,
{b) For purposes of %his Sec%ion a muzzle-loading rifle
is defined as a ~%ngle ~hot flin~lo0k or side lock p~rcussion
weapon with no telescopic sight~ forty-five caliber or larger,
and propelled by at t~a~a fifty grains of black powder.
(c) ~ny per,on violating th~ provi~ions of this Section
~hall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor.
Po~ state law a~ to authority of kh~ County 'to adopt this
section, sma section 29.1-~2~, Code of virginia, 1950, ag
Veto: Unanimous
12 .E. ~ CONSIDER AW ORDIN~NCZ TO ~ T~ CODE
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertissd for a
public hearin~ bo consider an ordinance to a~end the Code of
the County O~ Chesterfield, 1978, as amended relating to
and stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of said
amendments.
i
Mr. George Beadles, Jr., a resident of Matoaea Dis~rist, stated
he felt the proposed revised standards were d~signed to provid~
relief to the Shocsmith La~dfill~ suggested that the ordinance
be remanded to the Planning COmmission for additional ~eview as
there are ssveral other concerns which need addressing. Mr.
Mcface Sims, a resident oi Carver Heights, voiced Strong
concern that changes to the standards were an attempt to alter
the conditions placed on th~ Shoosmith Debris Landiill when it
was approved for rezcning in July, 1989 end that it wa~
inconcsivable to him that the change to allow only one person
was an effective/efficient mechanism to handle the volume
traffic entering/exiting the landfill.
When asked, Mr. Bradford H~ummer, Deputy dounty Administrator,
sta~ed tha~ when the Board adopted the debris landfill
~tandards they were the first r~gUl~tions of their typo adopted
by any local government in the Co~monwealth; that as such~ when
the Board accepted the ~taff re=oE~endations, included in ~hat
ordinance the Board also asked staff to review the standards
and ensure that the industry concurred that the ~ebris reg~lla~
tions ~ere practicable and equitable.
Mr. Oliver D. Rudy statsd he felt it should be noted the siting
standards for debris landfills adopted by the Beard was the
first of its type ad0ptud; that it was not unusual
r~-e×$~in9 or refine ordinances after thsy had been in effect
for approximately a year to determine their ~ffeeti~eness,
etc.; and that such action did not necessarily deteriorate the
text of the ordinance.
Mr. Currin indicated that the Board wa~ not eddre~slng any one
particular case in its eonsideratiun of amend~ent~ to the
debris landfill standards and'that th~r~ were complaints ~rom
others be~ides ~r. shoosmith that prompted the review of ~aid
standards. ~r. Daniel stated that prior to this meeting h~ had
n~v~r correlated any zoning ease wi~h the ordinance and assured
tho~e present ~at this action is no% d~$ignsd ~o relieve
oondition~ ~posed o~ any one Darticular individnal or land-
fill; and that he p~rceived the proposal as mexety a finetuning
of the exis:ing ordinance. Mr. Sullivan ~%a~ed this was not
~ransD~re~ and re~erenc~d a recent amen~ent to ~e septic
~ys%em ordinance regarding annual
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, $~Gonde~ by Mr. Appl~ga=e, the Board
adoDt~d ~h~ following ordinance:
~ ~ ~S~I~, 1978, ~ ~,
~ ~FI~
BE IT O~AI~ED, by the ~oard of supervlsor~ of the County
of Chesterfield, virginia, ~at Section 21.I-127(f) of the
of th~ Couut~ of Chesterfield, 1978, a~ ~ended, ia he~
amended a~ follo~:
Sec. 21~1-127. Conditional
The following us=u may be allowed by Conditional Use,
~ubjecr to =he provisions o~ Section 21.1-9:
(f) La~dfill$ - C~nstructlon/Demoli%ion/Debris only
subject to ~h~ following minlm~ restrictions plu~
by ~e Board of Supervisors:
90-469
(4)
(5)
Buffers and Setbacks:
a. A 100 foot buffer shall be maintained
between any digturb~d are~
property unless the Planning Commission
approves a reduced buffer cont~ininq
landscaping or other feat~e~ which provide
the s~e protection to adjacent property as
a 100-foot buffey and the requiremeuto of
Cell Designs:
a. A cell liner ~uivalent tu twelve (12%
inches of impermeable clay (1 × 10--
OM/SEC} shall be installed.
b. A synthetio liner may be substituted for
the clay liner noted in (al above if the
synthetic liner is installed over a twelve
(~2) inch soil cushion.
c. An eighteen (18) inch sand drainage blanket
shall be installed ever the liner.
d. A five (5) foot ~eparation shall be
~aintained from the waste ~aterial to the
seasonally high
~e=ermined by field measurement.
e. The minimum liner eenterline slope shall be
two ~2) parcent unless otherwise approved
by site plan reviaw.
f. The mimimum liner cross slope shall be two
(2) percent unless otherwise approved by
site plan review.
Aoeess
a. The entrance road~ taper and turn lanes
~hall he paved in accordance with Virginia
Department of ~ighway Standards.
b. The entrance Yoad ~hall be paved from its
intersection with a public uoa~ for a
distance of a% leas% 300 feet into the
landfill prope~y from a public road
the Director of Transportation
shorter paved entrance road will provide
Access Control:
a. A gate attendant and/or operator ~hall be
debris. For sites operating with a sinqle
person a~ attendant/operato~, only one
truck shall be unloaded at a time in the
in~ure proper load inspection and control.
b. The gate attendant ~d/or opera,or shall
in,peet all l~ad~ ~rom a point which
pe~its visual inspection of the load. The
i
I
inspection shall be conducted to prevent
the dumping of all unauthorized materials
including liquid and hazardous wastes. The
permit holder will he responsible for
a~suring the removal of al~ unauthorized
o o o
The facility shall be surrounded On all
sides by natural barriers, fencing, er an
equivalent means of controlling vehicular
traffic. All access will be limited to
gates, and such qat~g shall be securable
and equipped with %acks.
Drainage and Erosion Control:
e o o
All denuded slopes that will be 2xDosed for
periods in exce~ of nin~[y (90} days shall
have proper silt Zencinq, and with the
exception of %h~ working face of on~
etackpita of ~i!l material, each denuded
slope ~hall be ~ded in the first planting
season (spring or fall) following the
establishment cf ~uch ~lop~, Slopes
lacking an adequate vegetative cover to
prevent erosion shall bo ra-~eeded during
the next planting season.
Ccmpactlon and Cover~
a. A ~o~cted soil cover shall be utilizud as
requir~d'"~o preven~ Erosion and safety
''hazards.'" A minimum One foot thick
progressive cover shall be maintained
weekly such 'that toD of the lift i~ fully
fire break will be installed on the work
permit and the working face shall be kept
as small as practicable.
Debrie shall be spread in ehallow layers no
higher than twenty (20) f~t and eo~pacte~.
~e~ors a new lift is started all side
slopes shall be covered wi~h ~inished
slopes which uumply with the solid waste
management r~gulatiens of the State
Department of Waste Management.
The operator shall be responsible for
maintaining th~ appropriate personnel to
operate the situ efficiently and
effectively. At all ~imes, that the gate
is opened and the site is receiving waste,
on duty inspecting load~ and spreading and
compacting ~he waste.
90-471 6/13/90
(11) Leachate Contingency Plan:
bm
The operator ehall notify the County
im~ediately when ann leaehate discharge is
released and o£ the procedures that will b~
employed to contain the ~ischa=gu prior te
removal.
o o o
(12)
In addition to the information required for
the submission of a Conditional Use apDli-
cation~ the following information shall be
~u~mitted for any Conditional Use
application for the location and Operation
Of a debris landfill.
Location Map at a 1" - 200' scale showing
all of the following cha~ac2eris%ies within
500 feet of the property boundaries of the
proposed project.
Zoning, tax parcel and property map at a
scal~ acceptuble to the Director of
Planning.
Ayes: Mr. Currin, Mr. Sullivan, Nr. Applegate and Mr. Daniel.
Abstention= ~r. Maye~ as he was nnclear On the changes
proposed.
lZ.F. TO ~0NSlDER 1'Itu CORVEYA~C~ OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TPAUf OH
VIRGINIA, AT THE CHESTEI~IELD AII~ORT I~DUSTRL%L PA~
R(~%Di%~D ~.AT~DA~ROX~ATBL¥ 1.070
~S~ LI~ OF ~CA~ ROAD,
RO.,~,D 'z'O AP~RG, 1~C.
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consid=r the conveyance of an approximately
five (~) aoze parcel in the Ai~uort Industrial Park, known as
8100 9rnitepine Road, to Arburg, Inc.
No one came forward to speak in support o~ or against
matter.
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, eeconded by ~r. Daniel, the Boa~d
approved the conveyance of all %hat certain tract or parcel of
land containing approximately five ~5) acres, located in the
Dale ~agi~terial District of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at
the Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park~ which parcel fronts
approximately ~96 feet on Whitepine Road and is leoated
approximately 1,070 feet nort_hw~st of the west line of Reycan
Road, and is known as 8100 Whitepiae Road in the a~oum% of
$1,500~000 ~e Arburg, Inc. and appropriated $52,250 in proceeds
from the sale to cover all ~xpenses assooiate~ with the
County's recent purchase of this property. (A copy of Said
plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
90-472 B/13/90
$7~000 FOR '~ PU~E OF ~P~ A
OY ~ O~ ~ A ~Dl~ OFFIC~
FOR USE ~ A B~ ~
Mr. Stegmaier ~tatnd this date and ti.ro.e had been advertised for
a public hearing to consider an amendment to the 1989-90 Rudget
to appropriate $735~00D for the ~rchafe Of land on which a
medical office buildinq ia located for use as a branch library.
appzopriat~ ii~e dus ~o ~he ~raffic congestion in thi~ area.
Mr. Micas requested, if approved, that th~ motion include the
intention that funds will be r~turned ~o the Reserve for Future
Capital Projects Fun~ from the proceeds of a future bond
r~f~rendum.
Mr. John Holmes, a Dale District resident, voiced $~pport for
the proposed bxanch library mite as he felt the subject
location would he very convenient and provide many benefits ~o
those re~idin~ in thi~ area.
Mr. Dan{el ra~erenaed a letter from the County A~mlnis~rator to
building as a clinic while the existinq clini~ is being
Library.
Oa motion of Mr. Daniel, ~conds~ by Mr. Mayas, the ~oard
appropriated $735,000 fr~m the Reservu for Futur~ Cap~tal
Projects for hhe purchase of 4~0I aeadowdale Boulevaxd Medical
~uilding for u~e a~ a branch library, with ~he understanding
that £un~ will be returned to th~ Reserve for Future Capital
legaily pormitted~ and that in the interim that maid building
be used as a clinic until the existing clinic is fancy=ted.
VOte: Uuanlm9us
Mr. Currin sta~ed he fele the subject site would also be
advantageous to the ~ellwood and Bensley communities.
13. N~W BUSINESS
13.A. AUTHORIZATION TO REFER CHRSAPRAR~ BAY PI~ESERVATION ACT
Mr. Currin ftited %hat during the work gess'ion it was suggested
arise from consideration of Ordinances I and II relative ~o the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation As% and prior to the appoin~en%
Planning Commission to dateline the criteria for
co~kk~e. Ik was qote4 for clarification ~at
discussion pertained ko an e~tiru County plan as opposed
On motion of ~z. Cu~rin, zeconded by Mr. A~plegate, the Board
referred to th~ Planning Co~ission for review and ~onsi~era-
tiaa the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinances I and
Vote: Unanimous
90-473
13 .B. CON.~I~H PURCHASE OF ~WO A~RS MORE OR ~E~S IN ~ON 1~0~ A
0n motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
approved the purchase of a two acre parsel of land, more or
less, located on the south sid~ cf ~non Church Koa~ between
Route 10 and Rivermont Road for a branch library in Enon in the
amount of $1~0,000~ authorised a temporary transfer of funds in
%he amount of $150,0~Q from the Central Brunch Library Capital
Improvement Progra~ until bonds are sold in 1991 and ~und~ can
be repaid to the Central Branch Library Capital Improvement
Pregram~ and authurlzed the County Administrator to execute all
necessary document~ for th~ acquisition Of the subject
property. (A copy o~ said location ~a9 i~ filed with the
papers of this Boar~.)
Vote: Unanimous
SEX DATE FOR A PUBLIC HF~ARII~G TO CH~SIDER THE
~RO~ATION OF $2,000,000 FOR THE BURCHASE OF A
FOR A NO~r~u~ ARK~ HIGH SCHOOL AND $60~,000 FOR 'r~
D~V~LOpM~TOF T~L~KE C~SDIN
Discussion and co~ents ensued relative to there being
individual consideration of appropriations for the purchase
a ~it~ fur ~he northern area high ~chool site and ~e develop-
ment of a park and facilities, etc.
On motion oi Mr. Sullivan~ seconded by Mr. Daniel~ the Board
set the date of June 27, 1990 at 9~00 a.m. for a public hearing
to con~ider the appropriation of $~,000,0OO for the purchase of
a sit~ fox a northern a=ea high school.
Vu=~: U~anlmuus
On ~o~ion of Mr, Maye~, ~conded by Mr. Ap~legat~, ~he ~oard
n~t the dat~ of Jun~ 27, 1990 at 9~00 a.n. for a public bearing
to consider the appropriation of $600~000 for the development
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Stegmaier noted~ if thes~ actions were approved niter
public hearinq~, that ~hey be accomplished wi~h the under-
standing that funds will b~ x~turnmd to thm Reserve for Future
Capital Projects Fund from the prooeeds of a future
referena~ and sale.
On motion of Mr. ~nllivan, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
suspended its rules to allow simultaneous nomination/appoint-
ment/reappointment of individual~ ~o serve on ~he Youth
Bervices Commission.
On motion of Mr, Sullivan~ seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Beard
simultaneously nominated/appeinled/rsappcinted the following
i~divid~al~ to ~erve ou th~ Youth Services Commission, whose
tsrms are sffactive July l, 1990 and expire as i~dlcatsd:
Bermuda District
Mr. Juries Briggs (appoint/~en%)
Mr. James ~ut%onfield (r~appointment)
Mr. Jason Barber lrenppeintmunt)
Adult 6/30/94
Adult 6/30/94
~igb ~chool 5/30/91
90-474 6/13/90
Clover Hill District
Mrs. Kathy Rector (appointment}
Mrs. cheryl Ghorashi (appointment)
Ms. Hillary Earkin~ (reappointment)
Mr. Marcus Mc~lhinnsy (appolnt~en%)
Date District
Mrs. Lillian Duffle (reappolntmentl
Mrs. Melinda Burnette (appointment)
Mr. kenald Briggs (reappoint~snt)
Ms. Kara Hudson (appointment)
Matoaca District
Mrs. Barbara J~rnigan (reappointment)
Ms. Andrea Jones (reappeintment)
Midlothian District
Mrs. Dee Dee Latly (reappointment)
Mr. Kurt Hnlett (appointment)
M~. Quynh Nhu Bean (reaDDointment)
Vote: Unanimous
Adult 6/50/9%
Adult 6~38/92
Manchester
Nigh School 6/30/91
Clover Hill
High School 6/30/91
Adult
Adult 6/30/94
L.C. ~ird
Nigh School 6/30/91
Meadewbrook
~igh School ~/30/9I
Adult ~/30/93
Matoaca High
Adult
Midlothian
High School 6/30/91
Monacan High
School 6/30/91
13.D.2. CITIZ~S TRANS~ORTATIONADVI$0R~ COMMISSION
On motion of Mr, Daniel, $pcen~e~ by Mr. Mayes, the ~oa=d
~uspended ±t~ rules to allow ~imultaneeus nomination/reappoint-
memt of in~ivlduals to serve on the Citizens Transportation
Advlso~y Commission.
Vote: Unanimous
On mo=ion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayer, the Board
simultaneously nominated and reappointed MS. ~t Szabo and Mr.
aerber~ A. Richwins as primary repre~entative~ from
Chesterfield County to ser~e on the Citizens Transportation
Ad~isory Commission, and further nominated and appointed Mr.
Cecil Maxon, Jr. and Mr. J. Ruffln Appersen as alternates, all
~erms being effective July 1~ 1990 and e~pirinq June 30~ 1992.
13.~. CONSENT ITEMS
13.E.1. STATE RO~DAUCEPTANC~
Thi~ day th~ County ~nvlro~nt~l ~ngineer, in accor~nc~ with
direotlons from thi~ Board~ made report in writing upon his
ex~ination of Rivers Mend Road, Rivers Men~ Circle, Kristen
Lan~, Rivers Bend COUrt amd Karlyn Court in River~ B~nd,
Sections i and 2, B~uda District.
UpoA =onsideration whereof, and on mo~ion of Mr. Sullivan,
seconded by Mr. Applegat%, i% is resolv~ bha% Rivers Bend
Road, Riv~ru Bund Circle, Kristen Lane, Riv~r~ Bend Court and
Karlyn Court in Riv~r~ B~nd, Sections I and 2, Be~uda
90-475 6/13/90
District, be and they hereb~ a~e established as public roads.
And be it fu~thur reselved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be end it hereby i~ requested to take into
northerly 0,18 milo to the intersection with Rivers Bend
Cirele~ then continuing northerly Q.23 mile to end at the
intersection with Kris%eh Lane; Rivers ~end Cincle~ beginning
at th= intersection with Rivers Bend Road and going westerly
0.I8 mile, %hun turning an~ going northerly O.1O mile to the
intersection wi~h Rivers Ben~ Court, then continuing northerly
O.IQ mile, %hun turning and going northeasterly 0.05 mile to
th~ intersection with Karlyn Court, {h~n Con%inning north-
easterly 0.I0 mil~ to the intersection with Kristen Lane, then
continuing northeasterly Q.11 mile tQ end in a cul-de-sac;
Krlsten Lane, beginning at the inte2~ection with Ri~er~ Bend
Circl~ and going easterly 0.05 mile to the intersection with
Rivers Bend Road, then continuing easterly 0.15 mile to end in
a cul-de-sac; Rivers ~en~ Court, beginning at the inter-
~ection with Rivers Bend Circle and going sas%only 0.08 mils
end in a cul-de-sac; and ~arlyn Court, beginning at the
intersection with Rivers Bend Circle and going southerly
milo to end in a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
These roa~s serve BB l~ts.
And be it further re,dived, that the Beard of Supervisors
guarant~e~ to th~ Virginia Department of Transports%iOn a 50'
right-of-way for all of these roads eEcept Rivers Bend Road
which hen a varia~t~ width 50' to ~00' right-of-way.
Suction 1. Plat ~ook ~6, Page 33, February 23, 1987.
Section 2. Plat Book 60, Pages 47 and 48, February 17, 1988.
This day the County Environmental Engineering, in accordance
with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
his examination c~ Be%heeds Drlvo in ~ineola, See%ion B and
Carrisbrook, Bermuda District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. ~ullivan~
seconded ~y ~r. Applegate, it is resolved that Bethesda Drive
in Mineola, Section B and Carrlsbrook, Bermuda District, be and
it heneby is ~utablished as a public road.
And be it further resolved~ that the ¥irqinia Department of
Tr~nsportatlon, ~ ~n~ it hereby is requeste~ to take into the
secondary SyStem, Be%heeds Drive, beginning at the int=rsectlon
with Timonium Drive, State Route 3531, and going ass%arty O.0Z
mile to tic into existing Be%heeds Drive, Stat~ Route number to
be assigned, Mineola, Section D. Again ~ethaeda Drive,
boginnin~ at the intersection with $~locir ROad, State
3532, en~ going westerly 0.03 m~le to t~e into ~xisting
Bothesdo Drive, State Route number to be assigned,
section D.
This request is inclusive of tho adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
This road 8erv~s as a oonn~o%or road.
90-476
And be it further resolved, that tho Board of Supervisors
guarantees to ~l= Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for this road,
This section of Mineola is recorded a~ follows:
Section B. Plat Book 41, ~age 37, Jnly 16, t982.
Carrisbroek is recorded as follows:
Plat Book 45, Page 70, April 26~ 1984.
Thim day the County ~nv£xor~ental Bnginserieg, in acuor~ance
with directions fro~ this Board, made report in writing upon
his ex~minatlen of Ivywood Road, Kxag Road, rack Rcad~ Ivywocd
Ceurt~ Krag Cir~Ie and ~rag Court in Lakewood Farms, Section B
and a pcrtlon of Lakewood Farms, Section A, Eerm~a DistriCt.
Upon eonsld~ratlon whereof, and on motion of Mr. Sullivan,
seconded by Mr. ApDlegat~, it is resolved that Ivywood Road,
~rag Road, Zack Road, Ivywood Court, Krag Circle and Krag Court
in Lakewood Farms, Section H and a portion of Lakewoo~ Farm~,
Section k, Bermuda District, be and they hereby are established
a~ public road~.
And be it further resolved, that th9 Virginia Department ef
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Iv~wood Road, b~ginnimg at the int~rsec~io~
with Ecoff Avenue, State Route 1502, and going northerly 0.09
mile ~o th~ intersection with Krag Road, then continuing
continuing northerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with I~ood
Court, then continuing northerly O.o3 mile to end in a
c~l-de-sac; ~rag Road, beginning at th~ intersection with
with Krag Circle, then continuing ~ast~r!y 0.08 mile ~o =he
int~rsection with Krag Court, then continuing northeasterly
0.O~ mii~ to ~nd in a cul-de-sac; Zack Eoad, beginning at the
inter~ection with Ivywodd Ro~d and going westerly 0.O6 mile to
~n~ in a ~mporary turnaround; Iv~ood Couru, beginning at the
inte~eetiOn wi~ I~ood Road and going westerly 0.06 mile to
~nd in a cul-de-sac; Kzag Circle, .baglnning at th~ ~ntersection
with Kraq Road and going southerly 0.04 mile to end in a
cul-de-sac; and Krag Coure, b~ginning at the intersection with
Kraq Road and going northerly ~.85 ~il~ to end in a cul-de-sac.
This r~quest is inclusive of the a~jacent slope, sight ~ist~nce
and designated Virginia D~par~ment of Transportation drainage
Th~$e road~ serv~ 45 lots.
guarantees to %ha Virginia Depar~ent of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for all of ~hsse road~.
These sections of Lakewoo~ Farms are r~eorde0 ~$ follows:
Section A. Plat Book 49, ~age 72, Jun~ ~5, 198~.
Suction H. ~1=% acer S2, Page 49, March 19, 1986.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County ~nvironmental Engineering, in accordance
With directione from this Board, mede ~eport in writing upon
his examination of Eifinwood Read an~ Chrisfield Drive in Field
View~ Bermuda District.
90-477 6/13/90
Upon con~iderakicn whereof, and an mo~ien of Mr. sullivan~
seconded by ~r. App~egate, it is rsse%ved that ~flnwood Road
and Chri~field D~ive in Field View, Bermuda District~ be and
they hereby are established as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia DeDartment of
Transportation, b= and it hereby is requested to take into the
secondary System, Elfinwood Road, beginning at existing
Elfinwood Road, State Rout~ 1592, and going westerly 0.06 mile,
with Chri~field Drive; and Chrisfietd Drive~ b~ginning at the
intersection with ~lfinwood Road and going westerly 0.05 mile
to end in a temporary turnaround. Again Chrlsfield Drive~
beginning at the int~raection with ~lfinweod Road and going
easterly 0.03 mile to end in a cul-de-sac.
This roqn~st is inol~ive of the adjacent slope, ~ight distance
and designated Virginia Depart-meet of Transportation drainage
These reads serve 14 lots.
And be it further resolved, tha~ ~he ~oard of ~up~rvi$o~$
quaranteez to the Virqinia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for all of these roads.
Fiald View is reoordad as follow~:
Plat Book 53, Page 13, June 11, 19~.
This day the County Envirornuental ~ngin~ering, in aceordanc~
with directions from this Board, made re~ort in writing upun
his e×~r~ination of Landing Court in ~ernbrook, Landing Court
Section~ Clover Hill Dis~rict.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Snllivan,
seconded by Mr. Applogat~, it is resolved that Landing Court in
Fernbrook, Landing Court Section~ Clover Hill District, be and
i{ hereby is established a~ a public road.
And bs i= further rese!v~, ~_hat the Virginia Department
Transportation, be and it hereby is re~st~d to take into the
Secondary System, Landing Court, beginning at the intersection
with B0ones Trail Road, State Route 4420, and goin~ south-
easterly 0,04 mile to end in a o~l-~e-$a0.
This request is inclusive o~ the a~jacent $lop~, sigh~ distance
and designated Virginia Department cf Transportation drainage
easements.
This road serves 4
And be it further resolved, that the Board of
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a
right-of-way for this road.
This section of Fernbrook is record=d as follows:
Landing Court Section. ~lat Book 56, Page 61, April 1, 1987.
Vote: Unanimous
Thio day the County Environmental Engineerinq, in accordance
with direotione from this Board, made report in writing upon
hi~ examination of Gloucestershire Street and Dedds Ridge Drive
in ~ernbrook, 01de Williamsburg S~ctions II and III, Clover
Hill District.
90-478 6/13190
m
m
m
seconded by Nr. Applegate, it ig re~olved that Gloueastershire
Street and Dodds Ridge Drive in Pernhrook, Olde Williamsburg
S~ction~ II and III, Clov~ Rill District, be and they hereby
are established as public reade.
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into
Secondary System, Gloucestershirm Street, beginning at th~
intersection with Fordham Road, State Route 763, and going
northeasterly Q.06 mile, then turning and going northwesterly
0.09 mile to the intersection with Burgess House Lane, State
Route 3248, then continuing northwesterly O.O~ mile ko the
intersection with Dodds Ridge Drive, then continuing north-
westerly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Dodds Ridge
Drive, beginning at the intersection with Gloneestershire
And be it fur%her resolved, ~ha~ the Board o~ Supervisors
right-of-way for GloucesCerahire Strme= and a 40' right-of-way
23, 1986.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the Couney ~nvirunmental Engineering, in accordance
with dlreotlons from this ~oard, made report in writing upon
his examination of Donegal Road ~orth, Fermanaugh Drive,
Derryveach Drive, royle Drive, Teelin Court, Lifford Lane and
Buncrana Lane in Donegal 01eh, Section 2, Matoaea Dis%ri¢~.
Upon consideretlon whereof, and on ~oticu o~ ~r. Sullivan~
secon~e~ by Mr. Applegate~ it is resolved that Donegal Road
~orth, Permanaugh Drive, Derryv~ach Drive, Foyle Drive, Teeli~
Court, Lifford Lane and Runcrana Lane in Donegal Gl%n, Section
2, Me,ceca District~ be an~ they hereby arm ms~ablishe~ as
public road~.
And be it further re$olved~ that the V±rqinia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is r~ques=ed ~o take into the
Secondary Syste~, Donegal Read ~erth~ beginning at existinq
Donegal Road ~or~h, State Route 3490, and go~ng southerly 0.28
mile to the inter~eotion with Fermane~h Drive, then continuing
southerly 0.19 mile to end a~ the intersection with Derryvaach
Drive; Fermanegh Drive, beqinning at the inter~eetion with
Donegal Road North and going westerly 0.09 mile to end in a
cul-de-sac; Derr~rveach Drive, beginning at the intersection
with Donegal Rea4 North and going southwesterly 0.06 mile to
end in a dead end. Again Derryveach Drive, beginning at the
intersection with Donegal Roa~ North and 'going northeasterly
0.07 mile to the intersection with 5iffor~ Lane, then
continuing northeasterly 0.19 mile to the intersection with
Teelin Court, then continuing northeasterly 0.0~ mile to the
intersection with Buncrana Lane, th~n confirming northeasterly
0.D4 mile to the int~r~tion with Foyle Drive, then continuing
northeasterly 0.04.mile to tie into existing Derryveaeh D~ive,
State Route 3494; Lifford Lane, beginning at the inter~ection
with Derryveach Drive and going northerly 0.16 mil~ to end in a
90-479 6713/9~
oul-de-∾ Teelin Court, beginning at the intersection with
Derryveach Drive and going w~sterly 0.06 mile to end in a
cul-de-sac; ~uncrana Lane, beglnnlnq et the intersection with
Derryveach Drive and going ~outhea~terly 0.05 mile to end in a
dead end; and Foyle Drive, beginning at the intersection with
Dexryveach Drive and going northwesterly 0.15 mile to end in a
cul-de-sac.
This re,nest i~ inclusive of the adjacent slope~ sight distance
and designated Virginia Deparr~ment of Transportation drainage
These roads serve 78 lots.
And be it fuTther resolveS, that the board of Supervisors
guarantees To the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-w~ for all of these roads.
This section of Donegal Gls~ i~ recorded as follows:
Section 2. Plat Book 52, Page 83, May 1, 19~6.
Vote: Unanlmou~
This day the County ~nviror~ental Engineering~ in accordance
with directions from this Doard, made report in writing upon
his examination cf ~sgle Rock Avenue, Eagle Rock Court~
Anglewood Drive and Anglewood Court in Mistwoog ~or~st, g~ction
3 and a portion ef Mistwoo~ Forest~ Sections 1 and 2, Matoaca
District.
Upon eon$i~eratlon whereof, and on motion of ~r. sullivan,
seconded by Mr. Applegate, it is resolved that Eagle Rock
Avenue, eagle ~ock Court, Anglewood Drive and Anglewood Court
in Mistwood FOrest, Suction 3 and a portion of Zistwood Forest,
Sections 1 and 2, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are
established as public roads.
And be it further re~olv~d, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby i~ requested to take into the
S~cOnda~y System, Eagle Rock Avenue, beginning at the intersec-
tion with Mistwood Forest Drive, State Route 3470, and going
southerly 0.06 mile to th. int~r~ction wi+3n ~agle Rock Court,
then ccntlnuing southerly 0.09 mile to the intersection with
Anglewoo~ Drive, then continuing ~outherly 0.08 mile to end at
the inter,oat±On with Mistwood Forest Drive~ State Route 3470;
Eagle Rock Court, beginning at the intersection with ~agle Rock
Avenue and going easterly 0.05 mile, then tu~ninq and going
southerly 0.07 mile ~o sm~ in ~ col-de-sas; Anglewood Drive,
beginning at the inteCSectiOn with Eagle Rock Avenue and going
westerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Anglew0od Court,
then continuing westerly 0.05 mile ta end in a cul-de-sac; and
Anglewood Court, beginning at %h~ intersection with Anglewo0d
Drive and going northerly 0.06 mile to end in a cuI-de~sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation dralna~e
Theme roads serve 49 loin.
And bm it ~urth~r resolved, that the ~oa~d oi ~pervis0r~
guarantees to the Virginia Department e~ T~anepertation a 50'
right-of-way for all cf these roads.
These sections cf Mistwood Forest are recorded as follows:
Section 1. Plat Book 43, Pager 21 and 22, Jo_ua 2, 19S3.
Section 2. Plat Book 46~ Pages 71-73, July 19~ 1984.
$~¢tion ~. ~la~ 8cch $7, ~age 10, May 21, ~957.
~0-450 6113/90
VOte: Unanimous
Thi~ day the County Envircnm~ntaI Engineering, in accordanne
with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
hi~ examination of Stoney Creek Parkway, Stoney Creek Terrace,
Stoney Creek Court, Sandy Oak Road, Sandy Oak Tezrace, Sandy
Oak Court, Laurel Spring Road, Laurel Spring Court, Gzeyfield
Driver Greyfield Place and Stoney Creek Lane in Greyfield
Pls=e, Section !; Greyfield Place, Section 2; Sandy oak; Laurel
Spring; and Preston Place, Section 1, Matoaca District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of ~r. Sullivan~
Seconded by Mr. Applegate~ it is resolved that Stoney Creek
Parkway, Stoney Creek Terrace, Stoney Cr~k Court, Sandy Oak
Road, Sandy Oak Terrace, Sandy Oak Court, Laurel Spring Road,
Laurel Spring Court, Greyfield Drive, Greyfie!d Place and
Stoney Creek Lane in ~rey~ield Place, Section 1~ Greyfield
Place, Section 2; Sandy Oak; Laurel Zpring; and Pres=on ~lace,
Section 1, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are e~%abllshed
as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that th~ Virgini~ Department of
Transportation, be and ~t hereby is requested ~e take into the
Secondary System, Stoney Creek Parkway, beginning at the inter-
section with ~arrewqate Road, State Route 144, and goin9
southwesterly 0.04 mil~ to th~ intersection with Stoney Creek
Terrace, then continuing ~outhwe~terly 0.06 mile te th% inte~-
section wit~ Stoney Creek Court, then continuing southwesterly
0.09 mile to the intersection with sandy Oak Road, then
continuing southwesterly 0.06 mile to the inters~otlon with~
Laurel Spring Road and Greyfield DFiVe, then turning and going
westerly 0.10 mile, then turning and going southerly 0.05 mile
to the inte~e~tlon with Stoney Creek Lane, then continuing
$eutherly 0.06 mile, then turning and going southeasterly 0.10
mile to the intersection with Sandy oak RoaO~ then continuing
southeasterly 0.Ol mile to end at proposed Stoney Creek
Parkway, Greyfield Place, Section 3; Stoney Creek Terrace,
beginning at the intersection with Stoney Creek Parkway and
~oing southeasterly 0.04 mile to en~ in a cul-de-sac; Stoney
Creek Court, beginning at the inter~eetion with Stoney Creek
Parkway and going northwesterly 8.04 mile to end i~ a
cul-de-sac~ sandy Oak Road, beginning at th~ intersection with
Stoney Creek Parkway and going southeasterly 0.13 mile, =hen
turning and going southerly 0.05 mile to the intersection with
Sandy 0,k Terrace, then continuing southerly 0.04 mile, then
turning and going westerly 0.06 mile to the intersection with
Sandy Oak Court, then continuing westerly 0.09 mile ho end at
the intersection with $~oney Creek Parkway~ Sandy Oak Terrace,
beginning at the intersection with Sandy Oak Road and going
easterly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Sandy Oak Cou~t,
beginning at the intersectieD with Sandy Oak Road and going
southerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Laurel spring Road,
beginning at the intersection with Stoney Creek Farkway and
going southeasterly 0.05 mile to the intersection with Laurel
Spring Coo==, then continuing southeasterly 0.03 mile, t~sn
turning and going southerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac;
Laurel Spring Court, beginning a~ the intersection with Laurel
Spring Road end goinq westerly 8.08 mile, then turning and
going ~ou~herly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Greyfield
Drive, beginning at the inter~ection with Stoney Creek Parkway
an~ going northwesterly 0.04 mile, then turning and going
~0~therly 0.04 mile to the intersection with Greyfi~ld Pla~e,
then continuing northerly 0.12 mile tn end at the intersection
with Wray~od Avenue, State Route I5§9~ Greyfi~l~ Place,
beginning at the intersection with Greyfield Drive and going
westerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul=de-~ac; and ~toney Creek
Lane, beginning at the i~terseetion with Stoney Creek Parkway
and going westerly 0.OS mil~ to end in a cul-de-sac.
~0-481
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and d~iqna£ed Virglni~ ~epa~men~ af Transportation drainage
And be it C~rther resolved~ that the Board of Supervisors
gumrant~es to th~ Virginia Department of ~ransporta~ion a §0'
right-of-way for all of these roads except Stoney Creek Parkway
which has 5 variable width 50'-80' right~o£~way.
·hese subdivisions are recorded as fallows:
G~syfiel~ Place, Section 1. ~!at ~cok ~8, Pa~e ~, September
29, 1987+
Grsyfield ~lace, Section 2. Plat Book 60, Pag~ 61, Mar~h ~,
1988.
Sandy Oak. Plat ~ook 58, Page 92, October 23, 1987.
Laurel Spring. Plat Book 58, ~age 76, October 14, 19§7.
Preston Place, Section 1. Plat Book 14, Pages 8 and 9, July
23, 196~.
This day tbs Connty Environmental Engineering, in accordan0e
with dinectiona from this Board, mad~ report i~ writing upon
his examination of Koqer Center Boulevard Extension~ Midlethian
District.
Upon consldera~ion whereof, and on motion of Mr. sullivan,
seconded by M~. AppI~gate~ it is r~$olved that Kog~r Center
soulevard ~x~ension, Midlo~hian District, be sad it hereby is
established as a p~blic road.
A~d be it further resolved, that the Virginia D~partmcnt cf
Secondary System, Koger Center Boulevard ~xtension~ beginning
at the inter$oetion with Ko,er Center Boulevard, State Route
849 and Cmntmrvi~w Drivm, Stat~ Rout~ ~4~, and going north-
westerly 8.19 mile to end in a dead end.
Thi9 ~eque~t is inclusive of the adjacent slape~ might distance
and demignated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
And be it furthe~ resolved, that the BOard of Supemvisors
guarantees eo th~ Virginia Deparemen% of Tranmportation a 90'
right-of-way for this road.
This road is recorded as follows:
D~dication of Roger Center Boui~vard Extension. Plat Book 5],
Page 9, October 29, 1987.
15.E.2. R~QUESTFOR BING0/RAi~L~ PE~IT
On motion of Mr. ~ullivan, seconded by ~r. Applegate, the Board
approved a request for a raffle permit ~rom the Chesterfield
Little League for calendar year 1990.
90-482
WASTE~ATER SYRT~
0n motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Apptogate, t_he Board
set the date of July 25~ 1990t at 9:00 a.m., for a public
hearing ko consider an ordinance to amend the code of th=
County of Che~terfield~ 1978~ as amended, relating to the
required use e~ the County Wastewator System.
Vote= 9naaimous
13.E.3.b. TO CONSIDER A LEASE OF O~ICE SPACE, ~ANT~%RA[gD TIE
DOW~ SPACE TeA IR
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, ~econded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
set th~ date of June 27, 1990, at 9~D0 a,m., for a public
h~aring to consider a lease a~reement for o~fice space, hangar
and ti~ down space to Air Chesterfield, Inc,
Vote: Unanimous
I~.E.4. PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL ~OLID ~ASTE/4~iNAG]~ENT ~
On ~otion of ir. Sullivan, ~%condsd by Mr. Appt~gate, th~ Roard
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Tho Vir~inla Waste Managemen~ Board he~ adopted
regulations which requi~e eu~ry City~ County, ~ewn in the
Commonweal[h of Virginia to develop a solid waste nanage~ent
plan in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Waste
Management 9lane by J~ly 1, 1991; and
W~RRAS, Although the regulations in VR 672-50-01 permit
the solid wask~ management plans to be developed on an
individua~ jurisdictional basis, tho ~oard of $~pervisors of
the County of Chesterfield supports the concept %ha~
requirements can be moro efficiently and effeotively met
through participation in a regional solid waste management
plan; and
WH~AE, The regulations in VR 672-50-01 provide that
jurisdictions may petition the Directo~ of ~rhe Virginia
Department of Waste Management to designate the petitioning
juri~di~kion~ as pa~t of a region for %b~ purposes of solid
weave management planning and implementation in order to
WEEEEAS, The County oi Chesterfield i$ a m~e~
jurizdic:ion ~f th~ Richmond Regional and Cratur Planning
District Cu~i$$1ons, hereinafter callsd the
WHER~S, Tho County of ch~sterfle!d has adopted an
ordinance to join other jurisdictions -within the
WE~REA$, The Authority will be ~powe~ed by it~ Articles
of Inoorpo~ati0n with planning and implementing eu~hority for
~EREAS, Th% Co~ission and Authority are co~it=e~ to a
90-483 6/13/90
~lanning District 1~, which recognizes their overlapping
statutory planning authority and respo~sibili~i~ and
WHEREAS, The Richmond Regional Planning District
Commission and Crater ~lanning District Commission have each
entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Authority
for the cooperative development of a regional solid waste
management plan for th~ Authority's service area; and
WHEREAS, The aforementioned ~emoran~a of understanding
designate the Authority as the implementin~ agency for
developing, adopting and promulgating a regional solid waste
management plan for its service area and designate the two
planning district commissions as the regional planning agencies
for the Planning District 15 and Planning District 19 ~ubar~a~
of ths Authorlty~s service area.
~QW, ~H~R~FQR~ B~ IT P~SDLVED~ that the Board o~
S~Defvisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, doss
hereby petition the Director o~ the Virginia Department of
Solid Waste ~anagement to de~ignat~ th~ s~rvi~ area of the
Aut~or£ty as the regional solid waste management planning
boundary for th~ purpo~e~ of ~ompliane~ wXth VB 679-50-01; and
BE IT FURTHER RRSOLVED, that =he ~oard of ~upervi$ors of
the County of Chesterfield~ Virginia~ s~pper%m the Memoranda cf
Understanding between the Authority and the Richmond Regional
Planning ~istriet Commission and Crater Planning Distriot
Commission and do~$ h~reby agree to participate with th~e
aforementioned agencies in the development of a regional solid
wast~ management plan ~or the Authori~y's service area in
meeting the requirements of VR 672-50-01.
1~.E.5. WILT~E-OFF DNCOLLEC~IB~E ACCOI)lt~S 1rECEIVABLE - O~I~R
FEES AND C~ARGES
On motion o£ ~r. Sullivan, ~cOnded by Mr. Applsgat~, tbs Board
a~roved a request to write-o~ uncollectible accounts
receivabl~ in th~ amount of $183,279.57, with th~ understanding
that collection efforts will continue, a copy of which listing
Vote: UnanimQUS
13.~.6. FYP0 YEAR-E~DB~q~ETAD~UST~T~T~
On motion of Mr. ~ullivan, seconded b~ Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the F¥90 year-end budge= adjustments iD the total
~ount of $ 787,~00 for the Qeneral County Govef~en% as
follows:
undermp~nding on ~upplies ($2~,000). $ 60,000
~t~n~io~ $~i~ - rp~uced part-time
salaries ($6,200}? delay in building the
Facility {$31,800) . 38,000
~qimtr~ - There wag only one election held
in FIPO, but fund~ w~r~ budgeted fur two. 91,400
Buildings & Gr~dm - ~x~ems dollars in salaries
($83,60~) and utilities ($45,500) due to
90-484 6113/90
~anlt~tion - extended vacancy
Information Sy~t~mTe~L~O1Ogy -- Reduction in debt
finanein~ term for mainframe upgrade.
POlice - Vacancies in Com~unicattoD~ ($40,000).
associated with hi,kef prison population
Total Fund Sources
30,500
2~9,400
40,000
56,400
7~,100
7~7t100
~DDITIONAL F~DH ~DBD
A¢oeunting - overtime expenditures
low t~rnover ($~,600), and temporary
H%m~an ~eso~e ~anag~ment - low turnover ($11,900),
high part-tim, expenditures ($6,100), media
advmrtiming mxpmndi%ure$ {$7,000). 25,000
Co~t~ Attorne~ - low turnover and part-time
exp.nditure¢ ($~0,~00}, legal cervieeD
update of County Code ($19,000). 99,200
General se~ice~ ~iniutrution - low turnover,
($11,4~0) high part-time expenaitures ($22,200). 33,600
Support Center - increased d~man~ for printing
services - (off,et by rev%nee)
C~weal~ attorney - higher than
anticipated ~atary expenditures (partially
off,et by revenue) 701000
Pl~g - ~igh part-tim~ costs
to hiring of interns ($2~,00Q), no turnover
($20,00D), other personnel GOSt$
and advertising $11,000) 83,000
Sheriff - part-t~e and ovartim~
Cost of mid-year new d~puaies ($62,000).
operating co,ts for food & supplies
($~2~,0~0) associated with extra
9r~oners (par=Jelly offBet by ~evenu~) and
fleet charge~ ($57,000). 325,000
~or indigent clients,
TOTAL ]~U~DS
90-485
$ 787~100
6/13190
And furthsr, trans£err~d $400,000 from the Csneral Fund
budgeted for debt paymeDt$ and $250.0Q0 surplus in operating
budgets to cover costs in the Airpor: Fire station Capital
Project (3AP: and approved the dssignation of $39,000 to 5~
reserved and carried forward into FYPl in the Economic
Development D~par~ment~s budget to supplsment th~ advertising
progra~.
I3.~.7. S~I~ORT OF I~CATION O~ T~ D~F~I~S~ CO~ISSA.~X AGENC'X AT
FORT
On motion of Mr. Sullivant seconded by Hr. Applegate, the Board
approve~ the following resolution:
W~AS, The Unlt~d S~at=s Army Logistics Center and Fort
Lee provide ma~or economic, ~ecial a~d cultural benefits to the
Tri-Cities area while these facilities accomplish %heir vital
military mission;
WHE~EAS, Fort Leo is the region's largest ~mploy~r,
providing jobs to approximately
~EI~A$, The payroll
$250 million per year, is critical to the economy of the
Tri-citia~ area and surrounding jurisdiotions~ and
W~EREAB, The U. S. Department of Defense is currently
result of a thorough study which recognized th~ efficiency
all major branches of mili%ary service;
WE=P~AS, In October, 1990, a new Army TrQQp Support Agency
Headquarters building will be ready for occupancy at Port Lee
~roviding the necessary ~pace for the proposed new Defense
at Fort Lee using =he scoA-to-be available Army Troop Support
proposed consolidation~ and
loss of approximately 350 jobs which currently exist at Fort
WH~AS, Fort ~ee, Virginia, is strategically located
facilities ~ith an a~ractive eouununi%y and healthy cllma~.
~OW, T~R~FOR~ BE IT R~$QLV~D, by the Chestarfiel~ County
with reduced costs, and this Board strongly suggests that the
Virginia, is the most prudent and seuno alternative using
objective criteria to maximize these e~icieacy and
cost-savings goals.
V0te~ Unanimous
AGREKM~NTWITHA~ELIA COUNTY
On motion cf Mr. Sull~vaD, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
appxov~d and authorized the County A~iniotrator on behalf
the County fo enter into a Law Enforcement M~tual Aid Agreement
with ~slia County (which agreement is simila~ to an existing
agreement with Eenrlco County and the City of ~ic~0nd] whi=h
provides chat any lo0ality may request hack-up
assistance ~rom the other localities except that the new
agreement zequires ~he re~esting locality to pay extraordinary
costs incurred by th~ r~ponging locality. (It is noted a copy
of said Agreement is filed wi~h the papers of this B~ard.)
13.E.9. CON$tD~ATiON OF APPOINT~ENT OF ~R TO ~IVEP~IDE
I~GIOI~ ~ A~FRHO~ITY ~ AUTHORIZATION' ~O.. ~K
0n motion u~ ~r. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. A9ple~ate, the ~oard
adopted %h~ followin~ resolution=
WHE~AS, The River~id~ Rogional Jail Authority (the
"Authority") was crsated by Chapter 726 of the t990 Act~ of the
General Assu~ly of Virginia for the g~neral purpos~ of
establishing a regional jell facility to ~erve the Counties
Charles City, Chesterfield, PriDce George and Surry and t~
cities of COl~nla! ~eights, ~opewell and P~t~rs~urg (the
"Participating Jurisdictions"}; and
WHE~AS, As a condition of me~r~hlp in the Authority
each ~articiDatinq Jurisdiction aqrees to use the services
furnished by the Authority; and
to prapar~ a ~easibility ~hndy and conceptual design (the
"Initial Project") for a reglonal jail facility to ~e~ve the
Participating Jurisdictions;
W~E~AS, The service to b~ provide~ to the Participating
Juri=diction$ by the A=thori~y~ Inltlal ~roject will enable
them to dete~ine whether a regionml jail operated
Authority would be the most efficient means of meeting their
need for additional j~il
of the County of Chusterfield, Virpinla, that L~e B. Ramsey
hereby appointed aS a m~ber of %h~ Riverside Regional Jail
A~D, ~= IT FURTHER ~SOLV=D, that the ~oard of
directs and authorizes the County A~mlni~trator ou b~half of
%he County of chesterff~l~ to enter into an InieiaI Service
Ag~eem=nt, in substantially the same fo~ $~ ~xhibit I hereto,
between ~he Authority and th~ Participating J~rt~dictions for
use of the servic~ to be furnished by th~ A~thori=y~s
A~, BE IT FURTHER ~SOLVED~ %hat th~ ~oard of ~upervi~or~
~irects that tha County's initial payment of $~9,008 to the
Regional Jail Planning Cc~ittee and %he additional ~ of
$88,365, whi=h is hereby approprla=ed, be paid =o the A~eho~ity
90-487
6113t90
(It is noted a copy of the Inltial Service Agresmsnt is filed
with the papsrs of this Board.)
13.~.10. SE~ DATE~ FOR JOINT VIRGINIA DE~AR'~'~P~ OF TRANSPO~A-
13.E.10.&. TO ~ONSTDRRV~f~T'S PROPORED SECONDARY ROAD BIX-YEAR
After ~ome discussion, it wa~ on motion of Mr. Sullivan,
seconded by Mr. Appleqat~, resolved that the Board set the date
of Jnne 27, 1990, at 9~00 a.m., for joint Virginia Department
of Transportation/Chesterfield County public hearing to
consider VDOT'e Proposed Secondary Road six-Year Improvement
Plan.
Vote; Unanimous
13,E.10,b, TO CONSIDER FY1990-91 SRCONDARY ROAD
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, saoon~ed by Mr. Applagata, %he Board
sat the date of July 25, 1990, at 9:00 a.m., for joint Virginia
Department Of Transportation/Chesterfield County public hearing
to consider the FY90~9~ Secondary Road Improvement Budget.
!~z.ll. ~wF~. _~._.p~lp~ _ .c~A~.. I.SS!0N FOR CONSIpxp~T!pN
On motion of ~r, sullivan, seconded by Mr. Appteqate, the Board
re~erred to the Planning C~ission for consideration a Zoning
Ordinance ~endment ~elating to temporary outdoor vendors.
Vote: Unanimous
13.E.11.b. AN 0RDI/~%NC~ ESTABLISHING A ~ROCEDURE AND FEE FOR
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, suconded by Mr. Applegatu, the Board
referred to the Blanninq commission for consideration an
ordinance establishing a procedure and fee for amending
recorded ~ubdivfsion plats.
Vote: Unan±mo~s
15.~.12. A~aOV~ OF S~TTI~'~T OF ~D~LE ~ITI~TI0~
T~ CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERCHANGE AT JA~NKE ROAD AND
On mo%ion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by ~r. Applegate, the Board
approved s~ttl=ment of the ~oulders ~oulevard and Chippenham
Parkway/Jahnke Road interohang~ disputs as follows:
1. i~edi~te payment of existing unpaid ri~ht-of-way co~%~ by
Sigma and agreement to pay any future costs for th~ loop
project;
2. transfer by the Virginia D~partment of Transportation of
$2~0,900 ~rom t~e $1,O00,00Q o~ed the County for the Route
288/10 P~ojaot to th~ Bould~r~ Boulevard Project on the
County's Six-Year Road Plan; and
3. r~alloca~ion os $180,000 in right-of-way costs from
Boulders Sculevard to the ~cwhite Rarkway Project.
(It i~ noted settlement would assure final paymont from the
developer for the final portion o~ all the public road
public.}
i~.F.1. ST~T LIGHT INSTALLATION COST
On motion o~ Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. May~, the Board
approved the cost for a str~t light in~tallation at the
intersection of Berrybruok Drive and Little Creek Lane, in the
amount of $123.00, to be expended from the Dale Di~trlct ~trest
Light Fund.
13.F.2. STREET LI~
On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by
approved obtaining cost ~stimates for the installation of
street tight~ at the following looation~
1. Inter~eetion o~ Jeffer$o~ Bavis Miqhway and Won~erview
Drive, cn the ~o~theast carneT, B~rmuda District; and
2. Intersection of Briar Patch Drive and Euguenot Road,
Midlothian District.
Unanim0n$
13.F.3. REQUEST TO REDUCE SPEED LIMITS ON PORTIONR OF ~I~RINE
O~ mo~ion of ~r. D~niel, seconded by ~r. Currin, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Citizens have contacted the Board of Supervisors
an~ re~ue~t~d reduce~ sp~e~ limits on Whitepine Roa~, Rout~
701, ~rom Huntingcreek Drive, Route 1913, to Route 10 and on
Route 10 from Chesterfield Meadows Drive, Route 929, to
Buckingham Street, Route 1506.
NOW~ T~EREFO~E ~E IT R~MOL~D, that
County Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of
TranSpOrtation to reduce the speed lhmit~ on both o~ the~e
road~.
Vote: Unanimous
13.G. ~TILITI~ DRPARTI~T ITF24$
13=G.I. P~LLC H~%~ll~G$
13.G.l.a. TO CONSIDEK /tN OHDiNAN(~ TO VACATE A 150 ~
BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE IN C~STF~I~IELD CO~F~T~
~r. sale sta~ed ~his ~ an~ ti~e had been advertised for a
public henring to consider an ordinance to vacate a 150 foot
building ~es~ric~ion line in ~he Chesterfield county Industrial
Park, Section B. He' noted that even if this action is approved
an~ will vacate the building restriction line, any d~veloper
90-489 6/13/90
developing in the area must comply with height restriction
criteria as ~e~ni~ed by the Fedmral Aviation A~iaistration
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
propo~ed ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, second~8 by Mr. ~ayes, t_he
a~optad ~hs following ~rdinance:
AN ORDINANC~ to vacate a portion O~
a 150' building line restriction in
Chesterfield County InduGtriat Park,
Section B~ Dale Magisterial District,
Chesterfield County, Virginia, as
shown on a plat ~hereof duly recorded
in the Clerk's O££ica of the Circuit
Court of Chesterfield County in Plat
W~AS, Ch~sterfisld County Department of Economic
Development, petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chester-
field County, virginia to vacate a portion of a 15~~ buildin~
lin~ r~striction in Chesterfield County IndUstrla~ Park,
Section ~ Dale~ Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
Virginia more particularly shown On a plat of raco~d in the
~lerk's Office of the Circui~ Conrt of said COUnty in Plat Book
57, Page B6, made by AUStin Brockenbrough and Associates, dated
March 26, 1987. The portion of the 150' building llne restric-
tion petitioned to b~ vacated is more fully described as
follows:
A portion Of a 158' building lin~
restriction in Chesterfield County
Industrial Park, Section B, the
lose%ion of whluh is more fully
~hown, on a plat made by Austin
BzQckan~rou~h & Associates, dated
March 26, 1987. a copy of which is
a~tached hereto and made a part cf
this Ordinance.
15.1-451 of the Code of Vir~inia~ 1950, as amended~ by
the portion of the 150' building l±ns restriction ~ouqht to be
Virginia, 1950, ~s ~mendad, the a~orcsaid portion of the
accordance with Section 15.1-4E2(b) of the Cede of Vir~inla,
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County~ Virginia pursuant to
Section 15.1-4~5 of the Code el Virginia, 19~0, as amended.
portion of th~ 150' building lin~ restriction within Chester-
rights of public use.
i
t
Accordingly, this 0rdlnanc~ shall be indexed in th~ u~mea
of the County of Che~terfield, as grantor, and the Connty of
Ch~$~erfleld, er their s~cnessors in title, as grantee.
Vete; Unanimoua
13.G.l.b. TO CONSIDER~NO~DINAEC~ T0%~ACATEA 10 P~
~Y CONS~UCTION ~ACR0SS ~ 7,
~N S~.IVISION
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to 0onsider an ordinanGe to Vaca=e a ten (10)
foot temporary construction easement acro~s Lot 7, Eri~ Green
Subdivimi0n in exchange for a 5' t%mpor~ry construction
mmnt on L~t 6.
No one c~e forward to speak in favor of or against
proposed ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, m~conded by Mr. CurriA, the ~oard
adopted thm following ordinance:
~ ORDINANCE tu vacate a 10' ~porary
=tin Green Subdivision, Bermuda Magimterial
District~ Chesterfield County, Virginia,
as ahown on a plat thereo~ duly recorded
in %he Clerk's Office of the circuit Court
of chesterfield County in Plat Book
Pages I4 and 1~.
Corporation, p~tltioned th~ Boa~d of Supervisors of Chester-
field County, Virginia to vacate a lO' T~porary Construction
Maqi~terial District, Ch~gterfield County, Virqinia more
particularly ~hown on a pla~ of record in the CI~zk'm Office
the Circuit Court cf said County in Plat Book 65~ Pa~es t4 and
1~, made by Charle~ C. Townes & Ausociates, P.C~, ~a~sd
2], 1988. The easement petitioned =o be vacated is more fully
described a~ follows:
acro~$ Lot 7, Erin Green Subdivision,
the location of which is more
~hc~, on a pla~ made by ~alzer and
A~ociates, Inc.~ dated May 7, 1990,
a copy of which is aB~aohed hereto
1S.1-431 of %h~ ~ode of... Virginia, 1950, as amended, by
a~v~rtising; and
~E~AS, no public necessity exists Sot th~ continuance
NOW THE~FORE, ~E IT ORDAINED ~Y TH~ BOARD OF ~UP~RVISORS
OF CMESTE~IELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pur~hant to sec=ion 15.1-4~2(b) of the Code
V~rpinia, 1950, a~ ~ended, tho aforesaid easement be and
hereby vacated.
Thi~ Ordinanc~ shall be in full force and ~ffect in
accordance wi~ Section 15.1-482(b) of th~ Code of virpiDia,
1950, as amended, a~ a certified copy of thi~ Ordinance,
together with =he plat a~taeh~d hereto shall be recorded no
~ooner than thirty days h~reaftsr in the Cl~rk~ Office of the
Circuit Cour~ of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant
Section ]5.11485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as a~ended.
The effect of t=hi~ Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483
is to destroy the fores and effect of the recording of the
portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest fee
simple title of the easement hereby vacated in the property
owner of Lot 7, within Erin Green Subdivision free and clear of
any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names
of the County of Che~t~rfieldt as grantor, and ~. C. wheeler
Construction Co., A Virginia Corporation, or their
in title, a~ grantee.
Vote: Unanimous
AID OLIVER D. RUDY~ TR~RTE~r TN ACQUI~Z~G
FOR HIGB~W~DS OFF-SIT~ %lATeR LINE
Mr. Currin disclosed ho %he Board that, although he has no
financial interest in the project, he has not ye%ed on any
issu~ involving ~he ~ighisnds and ta be consistent with his
previous action declared a possible conflict of interest
pursuant to the Virginia Ccmprmh~n$ive
and exc~sed himself from the meetinq cegarding +-his matter
well as Item t3.G.2.b.I, Authorize=ion to Acquire Easement for
the Highland~ Off-site Watecline by Eminent Domain from the
Heir~ of Mr. ~l~ridg~ Cypruss~ and 13.G.2.b.2., Authorization
to Acquire Easement fen the Highlands Off-site Waterline by
Ther~ was brief discussion relative to the two {2) subject
parc~lm not b~ing shown on the County tax maps and not having
known owners since the 1840~s; that Mr. Ruby has been nnabls to
locate the heirs of the last known OWners; and the extension
this waterline is necessary for the health and safety of the
public; ~tc.
On motion of Mr. Maya~ seconded by Mr. Applegate, ~he Board
authorized the Right-of-Way Manager to aid Mr. Oliver D. Ruby,
Trustee, .in acquiring the two (2} water easement~ acrose the
Eldridge Cypress~ provided Mr. Rudy enter in a contract with
th~ County agreeing to pay for alt costs. (~ is nc=eO
of said plats are ~iled with the papers cfi this Board.)
13.G.2.b. AuTmO~Z~TION TO ACQUIRE EA~'T FOR 'r~u~ ~IG~.~m~NDS
owners hav~ b~en located.
On motion of ~r. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
aotharized the County Attorney to proceed with the use of
eminent domain on an emergency basis against the following
pf0perty owner, au the subject purc~l is not ~ho~n on the
County tax maps and has no known owners, the applicant has be~n
unubl® to locat~ the h~irs of th~ last known owners who live~
I
in the 1840'~, and the extension of this waterline is necessary
~or the health and sa~e:y o~ ~e public:
Heirs of Mr. Eldridge D~ed Book ~1, Page 355 Cypress
(It is noted the estimated value of ~h~ easement is $1,899.00
and will be deposited with the Clef9 of the Circuit Court upon
approval o~ the right to obtain eh=fy on said property and that
a copy of said plat is filed with the papers of thi~ Board.}
Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Appl~qate, Mr. Daniel and Mr.
Absent: ~r. Ceftin.
13.G.2.b.2. HEIt~S OF M~. $~F~%N G. WOOLD~DGE
Mr. Mayes expressed concern that no heirs of th~ last known
owne~ have been located.
on mo~ion of ~r. ~ayes, seconded by Rt.. Applegat~, ~u ~Oard
authorized the County Attorney to proceed with the u~ of
eminent domain on an emergency ba~i~ ag~in~ ~he following
County tax maps an~ has n~ known ownerz, the applicant has be~n
unable to locate the heirs of the last known owner~ who lived
in ~he 1840'm, and the extension of ~his waterline is necessary
for %h~ health and ~afety of %he publi~
~irs of Ms. Su~an G. Deed Rook 61, ~ag~ 355 $~,374.00
Wooldridge
{It i~ noted the estimated value of the ea~men% i~ $2,374.00
approval of the right to obtain entry on ~aid pTop~rty and that
~ copy of said plat i$ filed with %b~ papers of this Boar~.)
Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, ~r. Applegate, Mr. Daniel and Mr. ~ayes.
Absent: Mr. Currin.
~r, Currin returneO to the mee~iDg.
13.G~2.C. AUT]{ORI~TION TO EX~RCISE E~I~T ~ FOR
ACQUISITIO~ OF 1~ FOOT AND vA~t~ ~ ~=~P2~
FReIGhT MYST~, INC.
On motioa ci ~r. Cur~in, seconded by ~r. Sullivan, the Board
authorized the County Attorney to proceed with the use of
eminent domain against the following property owner if the
amount as set opposite their name is not acceDted. And be it
further re~olved that the County Administrator notify said
property owner by registered mail on June 14, 1990 of the
County's intention to enter upon and take the pruper%y which is
to be ~h~ subject of said use of eminent domain. Thi~ eotion
is on an emergency basis and the County intends te exercise
immediate right of entry, pursuant to ~ection I5.1-238.1 of the
Code of Virginia.
Yellow Freight Sy~tem~, In~, Tax Map 8~-09(1) $952.00
Parcel 8
90-~93
13.G.2.d. AuTuORIZAXION TO EXERCISE ~IN~I~T DOFIAIN FOR
ACA~II$ITION OF A 2B i~OOT PF~%N~ S~6Etl EAS~4ENT AND
FOOT T~M~ORAR¥ ~01~-~T~UCTION ~%~F/U~T FOIl '~'~ ROU'.L'.I~
1/301 ~ASeESS~T DISTRICT PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Curr£n/ seconded by Mr. Sulllvau, the Board
au~borlsed tho County Attorney to proceed with the u~e of
~minent do~aiu against the following property owner if the
amount as set opposite their name is ~ot aooepted. And be it
further r~solved that th~ County Administrator notify ~aid
property owner by registered mail on June 14, t990 of the
County's intention to enter upon and tek% the property which i~
to be tho ~ubjoct o~ said use of eminent domain. This action
is on an emergency basis and the County int~nd~ to ~×~rci~
immediate right of entry, pursuant to Section 15.1-238.1 of the
Code of Virqinia.
Trollingwood, Incorporate~, Tax Nap 116-2(1) $885.30
A Virginia Corporation Parcel 5
Vote~ Unanimou~
13.G.Z.e. AUTHOI~IZATION TO ACOu~K~ ~Ts FOIl KOUTS 1/301
SWWER ~SBSSMENT DISTRICT PROJECT BY EMINENT DOFAIN
AC~8 PROPERTY OF NS. DF-LOIIE$ ~AI~E ~ MR. HAROLD
SQ~ARE
On motion of ~r. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
authorized the County Attorney to prooeed with the u~e of
eminank domain Oa an emergency basis against the following
property owner if the a~ount as set opposite their name i~ not
accepted.
Ms. Delore~ Squar~ and Tax ~p 116-2(1) $59.~3
Mr. Barold Square Parmmt 3 $59.63
13.G.3.a. APPROVAL OF CH~NG~ ORDEHN~ 3 FOII LICKING CI~EK
TRU~K S~R
On motion of Mr. Appleqate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan~ the Board
approved Change order Number 3 iu the amount of $24,27S.00 ~or
Contract %88~01~1, Licking Creek Trunk Sewer, in or, er to
properly restore a considerable length along th~ oreek that did
not hau~ a wall defined bank and to prevent erosloD and
environmental damage, field conditionz nocemsitated the
installation of additional rip-rap, the oo~t of said work being
$24,278 and authorized the County Adi~inietrator to exeoute any
necessary documents for said change order. (It is noted f~nds
for this pro~ect are appropriate~ in the current Capital
Improvement Budget.)
Vo~= Unanimous
13.G.3.b. A~PII0VA5 OF AGI~T WIT~ VIRGINIA BE~ART~lf~ OF
On motion of Mr. Applega{~ seconded by Mr~ Sullivan~ the Board
approved an Agreement between Chesterfield County and tbs
sewer lines along Route 10 between Jessup Road and Coeby'e Lake
to execute the necessary docu~ente for said Agreement. (It i~
noted funds for this project ar~ appropriated in the current
Capital Improvements Budget~ and that the State is reeponeible
90-494 6/13/90
for 89.05% of the watsr line cost and 7Q.~7% of the sanitary
~ewer line cost, with th~ r~aining cost being paid by th~
County. )
CONSIDERATION OF RAId-ROAD AGREEMENT FOR MIC~A1~X CREEK
TRUN~ $~ER~O IVf~ONT ~OURP~ SHOPPING CEnTER
On motion of Mr. Applegete, seconded by M~. S~ttivan, the Board
accepted a Railroad Agreemsnt for Michaux Creek Trunk 8ewer to
Ivymont Sqnare Shopping Center with the Southern Railway
Company to allow tko Developer to install and the County to
~aintain a wasteweter line crossing of the ~outhern Railway
Company's right-of-way and t~acks at a point ?5 feet east of
~ilepost F-126 and authorized the County Administrator on
behalf of the County to execute any nsoessary documents for
said Agreement.
Vote: Unanimous
CiII~ANY Al' CARVER TNTERMEDIATE !~C. NOOL
On ~otion of Mr. Applegate, mecondmd by Mr. Sulllvam, the Board
approved the conveyance o~ an ~asement agreement with Virginia
Electric and Power Company for th~ inmtallation of u~erground
cable within a 2~* easement at Carver Intermediate Snhool~
which s~rvic~ is in conjunction with the a~itlon to ~ke school
and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the Cennty
~dmini~t~tor to ~xecute the necessary docllments for said
easement a~reement. (It i~ noted a copy of said plat ie filed
with the papers of this Board.)
13.G.3.e. CONWEYANCE OF EAS~4ENT TO VIRGINIA ELeCTrIC AND POWER
C0~PANM ~T ~Db01'HXA]~ ~/DDi4~ SCHOOL
On motion of Mr. Appleqa~e, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, ~he ~oar=
approved an easement agreement with Virginia Electric. and Power
Company fox the installation of undergroun~ cablu within a 15'
eas~men~ at Midlothian ~idd!e School, which s,rvice is in
conjunction with the a~dition to the school end a~thorizod tho
Chairmen of the Board and th~ Courtly Administrator to
the necessary documents for said easement agreement. (It is
n~ted a copy of said plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
MILLSIDE~0MEOWNE~SASSOC., INC. AND~OUI$ C .....
P~ON~ ET ~., OFF OF ~IE~
On motion of Mr. Apple~ate, seconded by M~. Sullivan~ the Board
approved a request from Dewberry & D~vi~ ~o quitclaim an
ingress and egress casement acro~s property Owned by L & L
C. Pear,on, et al, off of Arrowfield Road ~nd ~uthorized th~
neeessar~ quitclaim deed for Said vacation. (A copy of said
plat is filed wi~ the papers of
Vote= Unanimous
90-495
13.G.3oh. ~QUEST FOR ~P~dI$$ION TO E~CT A GATE ON AN
~NIMP~OWED COUNTY P/GHT-0F-WAY ~I~OWN AS ~TANW~X LAN~
On motion of Mr. Applegate, ~econded by Ur. ~ullivan, the Board
approved a request from Pastor Ernest Tonetti of Faith Nemorial
Baptist Church to erect a gate on an unimproved County
right-of-way known as Stanwix Lane to cut down on problems
vandalism and other mischief un their property at the end of
Stanwlx Lane, ~ubjec= to ~he e~ecution of a li=¢nse agreement.
(A copy of said plat is filed ~ith the pupers of this Board.1
ACCEPTANCE OF D~n$ OF D~nXCATION
13.6.3.i.1. ALONG ~%~DE~. C0~T F~OM ~A~. A~ MRS. V. tASSEL
ADAMSON~ JR.
On ma~ion Of Mr. ~pplegat~, seconded by Mr. Sullivan~ the Board
Scard accepted on behalf of the Gounty the conveyance of
O.O05 acre parcel of land alonq ~andel Court item Mr,
Adamson, Jr. a~d MS. Pea/1 R. Adamson and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the necessary deed of d~dication.
copy o~ said plat is .filed with the papers of this Board.)
A. BKICKER
O~ motion of Mr. Appl~gate, s~conded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
accepted on behalf of th~ County the ¢onveysnce cf a 0.002 acre
parcel of land along Bailey Bridge Road fram Mr. Charles A.
Bricker and ~s. Janica S. ~rickar and a~thorize~ the County
Administrator to execute the necessary. (A copy of ~aid plat
is filed with the pa~ers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
13.G.3,i,3, A~ONG ~ ~0RDON DRI~ FROM ~, ANNIE ~, GRANT
On motion of Mr. Applegate, ~econd~d by Mr. Sullivan~ the Boar~
accepted On behal~ of the County the conveyance of a 10' strip
of land along Le Gordon Driv~ from Annie ~. Grant an~
authorized the County A~ministrator
papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
~3.G.3..~.1. WA~T~FATER CONTRACT FOR B~LLWOOD MANOR DIVERSION
Jean Drive to G. L. ~uward, Inc. in the amount of $38,128.QQ,
and provide sewer capacity for devalopin~ areas west of 1-95;
~n~ further au~herlzed ~he County Adminietra~er ~e execute auy
by currant appropriations.)
Vote: Unanimou~
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
County Administrator to execute any n~css~ary documents:
Contract 89-10O9, Miche~x Creek Trunk Sewer to Ivymont
Shopping Can=er:
Developer: IVymont Square Associates, Ltd.
Contractor; coastline Contractors, Inc.
Contract Amount: Estimated Total - $237,880.75
Total Estimated County Cost:
~a~tewat~r (0ver$izing) $ ~7,677.79
(Refund thru connections)
Wastewater (0ffsite) $ 51,882.05
(Refund thru connections)
~$tlmmt~ b~v~loper COs~ $125,~20.91
Code: (0versizing! 5P~5~350-890730
13.G.3.).]. ~TILITIES CONTRACT FOR/~IST~OOD FOREST~ ~C~ION 4
AN~O~-$IT~0VIT~%LL ~TRUNK
0n motion of ~r. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, th~ Board
approved ~e following ~tilities contrac~ and authorized the
County A~ini=trator to ~x~cute any nPcessary
Con~ract 9Q-0342, Mis~wo~d Forest, Ssction 4 - and On-Mite
Con~ractor: Willi~ ~. Ha~on, Contractors
Contract Amount: Estimated Total - $51,627.43
Total Estimated County Cost:
Wast~wat~r (Ov~rsizing) - $13,632.46
(Refund thru connections}
~sti~ats~ D~veloper Cost: $37,994.97
Code: (Oversizing) 5P-58358-890730
13.G.3.~.4. REVISED WADT]~FATER COm'r~ACT FOR BEXLEY~ SECTION 15
On motion of Mr. Applega~e, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
ap~rov~ the following revi~ed wa~tewater and au[horized the
County Administrator to exeout9 any necessary documents:
Contract 89-0331 - Bexlsy - Section 15 Qu~fa11 Sewer
Extension along Providence Road;
Develop~r: The Pe~n Company
Contractor= T & E Conmtruetion Company, Inc.
Con%ra¢~ AmouDt: ~stimated Total - $169,145.29
Total Estimatsd County Cost:
Wast~ater - ~stimatsd Cask Refund - $107,727.00
(Additional Work)
Capital Rscovery Charges - $
Estlmatmd Developer Cost: - $ 24,358.00
Code: Cash 5P-57240-898~00R
Capital Recovery charges 5P-5835~-890733
90-497 6113190
On motien of Mr. A~plegate, s~conded by Mr. Sullivan, the Beard
approved entering into a professional software service contract
between Chester~ie!d County and Computer Systems and
Applicatiens, Inc. for ~he installatien of a state of the art
Utilities Billing System, at a fixed price of $305,65Q with the
major portion of $185,000 being funded in the ourrent fiscal
year end th~ remaining $120,050 being funded in FYPl under fha
operating =apital ~xpendfture$~ sDd further authorized the
county Administrator te ~xecute the necessary decuments for
said contract ~ubj~et to ~ppxoval of the Ceunty Attorney and
Computer Sy~tema and Applications, Inc.
ENCROACH ONAN E~ISTING 16 FOO~ SEWER F~SE/~ENT ON LOT
5~ SYC, AMO~E kTU~..~..SU]~U'ZVZSZON, PaAsz Zz
0n motion of ~r. Appleqat~, seconded by ~r. Sullivan, ~he Boa~d
deleted from consideratien a request fram Dewberry and Davi~r
Architects, Engineers, Planners and Surveyors, for Pulte ~ome
Sycamor~ Ridge Subdivi~iont Phase II.
~r. Sols pze~ented th~ 8o~rd with a zepor~ on the developer
water and ~wer con~e~ecuted by th~ County
13.H.
Mr. R~sey pre,anted the Bo~rd with a status report on
G~ne~aI P%nd Contingency Ac=ount, Gmn~ral Fund Balance, Reserve
for Futura Capital Pro~ects, District Road and Street Light
Funds, Lease Purcha~ea and S~hool Board Agenda.
formall~ notified the County of the acceptanc~ of the following
rcad~ into the Mtab~ ~econdary
BEXLEY EAST (Effective ~/31/90)
Route 3156 {E~s Crossing) - From Route 26~2 ~o
0,18 milo Sou=hwesC Rou~e 3749. 0.23
Route 374~ (R~ Crossinq Ceurt) ~ From ROUte 3156
to 0.04 milo Northwest Route 3t56. 0.04 Mi.
14..-AD,.TO'i~L~.~
on ~otien of Mr, Applegat~, $~eend~d by Mr, SUllivan, the Beard
adjourned at ~:40 p.m. (DST) until 9~00 a.m. ~DgT) on June 27,
Vote: Unanimous
County Administrator
Chairman
90-498 6/~3/~0