09-12-90 MinutesBOAI~,I) OF SUPE~Vt$OP~
12, 1990
Mr. C. F. C~rrin, Jr., Chairman
Mr. M. B. Sullivan, Vioe chairman
Mr. G. ~. Applegate
Mr. Harry G. Daniel
Mr. Je~Ee J. Maye~
Mr, Lane B. Ram~ey
Connty Administrator
Btaff in Attendance:
Ms. ~y Davis, Exec.
Ass%. to Cc. A~min.
ASSt. CO. Admin.,
Legis. Svcs. and
Intergovern. Affairs
Ms. Joan Dolezal,
Clerk to the Board
Chief Robgrt ~anes,
Mr. Dradford $. Hammer,
Deputy CO. Admin.~
Mr. William H. Howell,
Dir,~ Gen. Services
Mr. Thomas E. Jaoob$on~
Mr+ Robe~% Ma~den,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Human Services
Transp. Director
~r. RicharO MuHIfish,
Dir. of ~nv. ~ng.
Attorney
Mrs. Pauline Mitchell,
Dir. of News/Info.
Services
Sheriff W.J. Minton,
Sheriff*~ Department
Col. Jua~ph
Chief of Police
Mr. ~ichard
Deputy Co. Admin.~
Development
Mr. Jay Ste~aler,
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Dir. of Parks & Rec.
~r. David Welchons,
Dir. of Utilities
Mr. Frederick ~illis,
Dir. o~ Human
Mr. C~ffin called the mi%ting to order at 2:00 p.m, (DST) in
the A~mini~tration ~uilding Conference Room (Room
WORK SESSIONS
1.A. 1991 ~APPORTION[~EN~ OF COUNTY MAGISTEP~IAL DISTRICTS
~r. R~ey ~tated the purpose of the work session was to
provide the Board wi~h information regarding the 1991
reapportioD_ment of County magisterial districts.
mr. ~Rrthe~os, Assistant County Attorney, explained the
reapportionment process of County magistsrial districts,
required by Federal law; noted Virginia is one of ~Only three
states that ~u~t fully redistrict a~l state and local offices
prior to the November, 1991 General Election; displayed a
current map of districts a~d voting precincts and:addressed the
constraln~s by which localities ~ust comply to meet Federal and
State laws in this process; and outlined the proposed calendar
for accomplishing the reapportionment uf election districts and
discussed the legal ramifications of the Dr0cess.
Discussion, gu~$tiena and comments ensued relative to the legal
and statistical framework for redistricting and alternative
redistricting consequences; dsterminati0n of qualm; the
availability of preliminary information from the U. S. Census
Bureau~ engulng analysis of rsdistricting plans ~inq estimated
data being performed by the Redistricting Task Force; the
receipt of official U. S. Census Bureau information prior
being able t~ begin the actual calculation of district lines;
comparative analysis of minority population in Chesterfield
County with that of other jurisdictions; the election of
Chairman at-large and whether or not a Charter modification
would be necessary; squitabl~ redistribution 0f the rural
portion cf the County; the creation of districts by population
versus land mass; anticipated dates for final work s~sion and
public hearfnq process for th~ adoption of a r~distrlct~ng plan
by th~ Board; submitta~ of County redlstrictfnq plan to the
Department of Jnsti~e for pre-~learanc~ deadline~ to prepare
for primary and general elections; etc.
The Board recessed for two I2) minutes.
Reconvening:
1.~. FY91B~D~ET
Mr. Steg~mier pre.ended an overview of r~vi~d lOCal revenue
setimatee and possible offsets Po anticipated shortfalls of the
FYgl Budget, addressing issues regarding guidelines for
balancing the FYgi budget~ local revenue ehortfall~ (relative
to taxes such as real estate, personal property, local sales,
records%iOn, etc.; planning fee~, building inspection fees,
interest on bank deposit investments, all uther funds; etc.};
possible effects ta =he local revenue shortfall~ [i.e., County
and Sohool expenditure decreases; use of excess interest in
Capital ~rojects, Eeserve for Debt Servic~ etc.]~ li~t of
possible budget reductions and/or a~dltional options to be
considered; summary of reductlone in State aid, which did not
include reductions for same in education; etc. (It is noted
copies of an outline of information and comparative charts are
filed with tbs papers of this Board.)
Discussion, questions and comments ensued relative to ovex~ll
mechanisms for balancing the E¥9t budget; a letter from the
Director of Real Estate A~$smeot r~ferenoing data regarding
the impact of the Chesapeake Bay Pre$ervation Act criteria on
real estate a~e~m~nts; the impac~ of a hirin~ freeze and the
criteria to be considered in determining the critical nature of
filling positions~ the programmatic impact of not filling
positions; con~iderati0n of usin~ financial reserves, including
funds designated for future operating and capital budqets;
~r~dent management techniques to reduce op~ratiag costs where
applicable; consideration, on a case by case basic, whether or
not the County will assume responsibility for reductions in
State and Federal funding; identification of cateqoriee
non-essential costs; opportunities for increasing revenue
through improve~ collections and/or other alternatives; the
90-645 9/12/90
impact Of anticipated shortfalls/r~duction~ on development, f~
structures, hiring freezes; potential impact~ on the County's
bond raLinq; e%~.
Mr. Daniel asked that staff provide the Board with an assump-
tion paper outlining all aspects c~ the effects of tho
information be provided to the media for publication to
an e×plana%ion should be provided to developers to make ~hom
adjustments and/or reductions in staffing levels. Mr. Ramsey
noted that, with the reduction in applications and ~taff, the
same level of service would be provided for the same fee. Mr.
Sullivan requested that staff p~epar~ a resolution to b~ added
to the agenda requesting that the school Board, in conjuns=ion
expenditure of local funds totaling $2.7 million for ~x91.
The Board rece~ed for ten (10] minut~.
O~ mo~ion uf ~r. SulIivan, seconded by Mr_ Applegate, the Board
wen~ into Ex~tive S~ion t~ di~ou~ the condltloo,
acquisition or use of =eel propor=y for public purposes
relating to m school and pa~k site pursuant to Section 2.1-344
(a) (~) of tho Code of Virginia, 19~0, as amended.
vote: Dnanimous
Reconvening:
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegats, the Board
adopted the following r~solutlon:
WR~d~, th~ Board of Supervi~or~ ha~ this day adjourned
into Executive Sesoion in accordance with a formal vote of the
Board, and in accordance with the provisions of the Vir~ini~
Freedom of Info,me,ion Act; and
W~EREAS, the Virgimia Freedom of Info~ation Act effective
Session was conducted i~ conformity with law.
NOW, T~EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the be~t of each
member's knowledge, i) only public bu~ines~ matters lawfully
e~empted from open ~esting requirements under tho Freedom of
Information Act were discussed in the ~xecutiv~ Sea,ion to
which this certification applies, and ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in th~ Motion by which the
conaidored by the Board. No member dissents from this certifi-
cation.
Tho Boacd being pelled~ the vote was as follows;
Daniel: Aye.
Aye.
Applegate:Aye.
Sullivan: Ayu.
Currin~ Aye.
3. DINNER
The Board recessed at ~:15 p.m. (DST} to travel to The ~elta
Italia Restaurant for dinner in lieu of The Che~din Restaurant,
as origlaally {cheduled.
~r. Currin introduced Mr. Millard D. "Pete" Stith, Director
Parks and Recreation, who gave the invocation.
5. PLEDGE 0P A~,.LE, GIA~CE ~o x~ FLA~ OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
Mrs. Paulin~ Mitchell, Director of ~ew~ and Information,
the Pledge of Allegianc~ to the Flag of the United Stat~ of
America.
6. APPROVAL OF MI~U='~$ ' '
6.A. AUGUST ~1,, 1990
On motion of ~r. Sullivan, seoonde~ by M~. Applegat~, t~e ~oerd
approved the minute~ of August 2I, 1990, aa submitted.
Vo~e: Unanimous
6.B. AUGUST 22, 1990
on motion of Mr. Applegate~ seconded by Mr. Mayes,
approved the ~iuutes of Augus~ 2~, 1990, as amended.
the Board
6.C. AUGUST 29, 1990
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by ~r. Mayes, ~ho Board
~ppz~ve~ the minutes of A~gust 29~ 199Q~ as submitted,
7, COUNTY ADMINI~TRATORIS COMMENTS
Mr. Rumsey introduced Ms. Mary Ann M~rmo~, President of the
~ri~nds of ~he Library, who pre~nted a overview of major
accomplishments of th~ Friends Of ~he Library and recognized
contrihutlons to the County tibruries representing a $20,000
investment in the co~uni~y.
Mr. R~sey noted that, due =o length of the agenda, other
County Administrator Co~ent it~ zcheduled would be ca,tied
over to the '~ext ~oard of Supervisors meeting, regarding Item
7.A., Introduction - Equal Emplo~ent Opportunity Coordinator7
Item 7,D., United Way Kick Off Campaign; and Item 7.C.,
90-647 9/12/90
Recognition of Mrs. Doris DeHart Upon Appointment as Member of
th~ Natiunal Association of Counties INACo) Intergovernmental
Relation~ Steerinq Committee.
Due to the length o~ the agenda, the Board declined making
reportu at this time.
Mr. Curr±n excused himself from the meeting.
9. l~li~OiSm$ TO POSTPONE ACTION,
CH;~C~S ~ x~:u:; ONDER OF PI~ESEI~ATIO~
by Mr. Applegate, resolved that the Board move out of ~equence
Item 14.D., Nomination of Candidate for Appointment to the
10.C., Sponsorship of %ha 1990 Cities u~ Eeneicus Publick Day:
Chesterfield County Fair A~sociation for Presentation of a
I~entify $~,715,~00 in Reductions to the FYPl Budget; and
Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Apptegate, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes.
Absent: 'Mr. Ceftin.
Mr. Currin returned to the meeting.
10. ~SOLUTIONS AND S~ECIAL P~CO~NITION$
10.A. RECOCNT~ING S~PT~4B~R 17-13r 1990 AS "CONgT1ToTIONW~EK"
On motion of the ~oar4, ~he following resolution ~as adop%ed~
WHEREAS, The President and the Congress of the United
States have designated 9eptember 17 - 23, 1990 as "Constitution
Week;" and
WHERF2%E, Our Constitution created the Judiciary as a
~eparat~ and oo-~qual branch of qovern~ant; and
WR~REAS, 1990 is the Bicentennial of our dual system of
free and independent state ¢ourt~; and
WH~REAS~ It is also the ~ieentenniel o£ the partnership of
state and local courts; and
WMEREASt Equal justice under the law guarantees the
bleeeinqs of liberty and freedoms derived from the Bill of
Right~.
~0~, TH~REFO~ ~E IT Pd~$OLV~D, that the Che~terfiel~
COunty Board of supervisoms )oins with the Nation in honoring
the Judiciary and designates September 15~ 1990 as "Salute to
the Judiciary o£ Cheuterfisld County."
Vote: Unanimous
~r. Currin noted that ~aid resolution would he D~eEented to the
Judiciary at the new Courts Building on September 18, 1990.
10.B. ~C~IZ1/~G $BP~ER 21-28~ 199~ AS "NATIO~%LVOTER
On motio~ of tko Doard, ~he following resolution was adopted:
90-648
WME~A~, The League of Women Voters b~lieve$ that voting
is a fundam~ntaI citizen right that must be guaranteed; and
WHEREAS, The League of Women Vetere has declared the week
of Friday, ~pteJqber 21 to Friday, September 28, 1990 as
"National Voter Registration Week" and Saturday, September 22,
1990 as "Super Saturday" and "National Voter Registration Day;"
and
W~EREAS, Thc League of WOmen Vot~ of the Richmond
Metropolitan Area is working in cooperation with the county of
Chesterfield General Registrar to publicize voter registration
opportunities and to register voters at numerous looatlons; and
W~EEEAS, The County of Chester£isld, through its General
Registrar's Office, is offering additional opportunities fox
citizens to reglstar to vote by opening additional registration
sites at convenient locations and times throughout the County.
NOW, TEEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Beard of supervisors recognizes the week o~ September 21
to September 28, 1990 as "Katlonal Voter R~gistration We~k" and
SeDtemh~r 22, 1990 as "suDer Saturday" in Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Beard ~alls On all
citiz~n~ aged ~ighteen an~ ov~ tO register ~d e~erciee their
right to vote.
Vote= Unanimous
Mr. Curtis presented the executed resolution to Ms. Amy Burgett
of the League of Women Voters and commended their s£forts to
publicize voter registration opportunities, registration of
citizens eligible to vote and encouraging them to exercise
their right to vote.
10.C.1. ~NRIC~$
On motion of the ~oar~, the Board accepted a donation in the
the Menriou~ Foundation for sponsorship of the Citie of
~¢nrlcus Publlck Day event and adopted the following
resolution:
~M~MAM, The Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation
Department functions to ~ositively effRct the quality of lif~
in Chesterfield County~ and
WHEREAS, The provision of citie of Henrieus Publick Day
allows citizens to become f~iliar with their hiseorical root~;
16Q0~s in what once was Henricus, the second oldest English
settlemen= in ~erica.
NOW, T~E~FORE BE IT ~SOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors doe~ h~reby rgcQgnlze the ~enxicus
Foundation ~or ~ts generous ~ponflor~hip for ~ducational
purposes of Citi~ of ~nr~cu$ ~ubllck Day.
Mr. Curtis pxe~ented %he ex~cuted resolution
co~nded %he ~ctive ~upport and diligent efforts of these
involved for their contributions toward th~ Citie of ~enricus
~ublick Day event. Dr. Pastors extended an invitation to all
90-6A9 9112/9~
those interested to attend the event and presented the Board
with 5enricue Foundation pins.
I0.C.2. ~OVRAN BAI~K
On motion of the Board, the Board accepted a donation iD the
amount of $1,500 for the Parks and Recreation Department from
Sovran Dank for sponsorship of the Citie of Henricus Publick
Day event and adopted the following resolution;
WHEREA$~ The Cheet=~field County Pafk~ and Recreation
Depart_merit functions to positively effect the quality of life
in chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, The prevision of Citie of Henricuu Publiek Day
allows citizens to become familiar with their historical
WBEREAS, Thi~ day demon~trate~ what life was like in the
Settlement in
~OW, T~EREFORE BE IT RESSL%qfD, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors does hereby recognize Sovran Bank
for its generous sponsorship for educational purposes ~f Citi~
of Henricus Publick Day.
Mr. Cu~rin presented the executed resolution to ~r. ~illard
behalf of ~r. William ~ulloh, Senior Vice President of
Bank, who was unable %o attend and ~o~ended the active
and diligent efforts of those involved for their contributions
toward the Citie of ~enric~s ~ublick Day event.
14.D. N(~4INATION OF CANDIDAT~FOR~POINT~ENTTO-£~ SCHOOL
Mr. Mieae briefly explained ~he requiremen~ of the County
Charter by which a candidate for appointmen~ to the School
Board i5 selected; stated a public hearing was conducted on
August 2t, 1990, to identify individuals intereutud in serving
as a member of the School Board for ~he Dale Dis=riot to fill
the ~nexp~red te~ of Mr. Griffin R. 5often, whose r=uignatiO~
Wa~ effective August 31~ 1990; and s~a~e~, at this t~e, ~he
District Supervisor ~u~t nominat~ a candidate for said
appoin~ent. ~e ~urther noted that, in accordance with Charter
p~Ovi~iOD$~ any other Board me, er may also nominate ~
candidat~ from tho~e who identified ~hems~lves at the Au~s~
21, 19)0 public h~a~ing.
Mr, Daniei stated he in:ende~ ~o nominate Mrs. Elizabeth B.
~B=th" Davis as the candidate for appoin~ent to the School
Board fox ~e remainder of the unexpire~ te~ of Mr, Griffin R.
Burton, which term will ~xpire June 30~ 1991. He re~erenGcd
the 'general info~atlonal me,ting p~ocess for ~he entire
district at which the process was discussed and which Au felt
was very beneficial; the involv~men= of citizens in that
process; indicated citizens response tO that process
eubsequently led to the candidacy of three well qualified
candidates who offered themselves for consideration ~o the
position~ and expressed appreoiation to all those involved.
No other Board members indicated a desire to nominate any other
90-650 9/lZ/90
There being no fur%her nominations ~or the School Board
representative for the Dale District, it wa~ on motion Of Mr.
Daniel, seconded by Mr. Apptegate, that the Board suspended its
rules to allow simultaneous nomination/~ppoint~ent of Mrs.
~lizabeth B. Davis ~o serve 88 the School Board representative
for the Dale District.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mrs~ Elizabeth B. Davis to
~erve as the School Board representative for 'the Dale
Magisterial Dis:riot =o fill the unexpired term of ~r. Griffin
R. Burton and whoae term is effective immediately and will
expire June 30, 1991.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel ~seognized Mrs. Davis and her family who were
There were ~o hea~i~g9 of citizens on unscheduled matter~ or
o APPROPRIATION OF $2~p~,,D09 FOR pURCISm~ OF & $I'Y~ FOR ~'~
~r. 8~e~a~er stated that a~ it~ June 27, 1990 meeting,
Beard of supervi~o~e t0nduct~d a public hearing to consider the
approprla~ion of $2,000,000 for the purchase of a 8it~ for the
northern area high school. He noted after lengthy
~he Board closed ~e public hea~ing and budgeted funds from the
Re~erve for Future Capital Projects but deferred ~h~
appropriation until ~his
~r. Currin s~a~ed, ~ven though th~s was not a public
matter, he had decided to allow t~n {1~) ~inu~es each for all
~r. Jeff Han~el; Mr. Bill Greqg~ and ~r. Frank Layman voiced
support for the proposed appropriation for ~h~ construction
the northern area high school as they ~elt th% County has an
ref~r~nd~t which included the construction of ~uch ~ school;
that th~ County has ~ moral obligation =o children of the
County to provide the bemt educational facilities possible and
~liminate ~he ~everely overcrowdud school conditions; that
after much di~cussion~ debate and r~vie~, the Riverton tract
a fiduciary responsibility ts provide th~ ~ame u~ucational
enviro~en~ to al! students in ~ County and no~ vacillate
its efforts and allow educational standards to deteriorate;
tha~ =he Soard must meet i=s obligations to retain its
integrity and credibility ~ong the citiz~n~ Of %h~ County.
support of the Rivurtcn site as the location fo~ the northern
area high school.
Mr. Willi~ Thoatp~on, III, voiced opposition to ~e a~ropria-
tion for the purcha~ of the Riverton site but not to the need
for a centrally located northern area high school~ stated
remein many unanswered q~estions regarding this site tha~
Board must consider befor~ appropriating funding for the site;
tired ~ea~ons he felt th~ site was inappropria:e including
uncertaintie~ regarding cost estimate overruns, Robious Road
improvements, uccess into the site, inteznai roads to be built
90-651
into the ~ite to service th~ facilities cOnstrUCted, environ-
mental aspecte that have not been addressed, topography, water
and sewer expenses, drainag~ and soil conditions being unsuit-
able; displayed slides indicating damage by the developer to
existing creeks and referenced several complaints filed
regarding same: alternatives to the Riverton
inappropriateness of location of the eubject sit~ for
Facilities~ School A~ministration, introduced Mr. Charlie Pike
of J, K. Ti~onS~ Ino.~ who reviewed the scope of improvements
necessary for Robious Road, addressed concerns relative to
same, and exhibited slides depicting said improvements; and Mr.
Clayton Walton, attorney for the School Board, who addressed
environmental eonoerns~ indicated the corps of Engineers has
~horoughly reviewed uhe subjee~ ai~e and inOioated their
determination to be that the proposed ~chcol development
project will impact less than i acre of headwaters wetlands and
satisfies the criteria contained in the Carps nationwide
p~rmi~ process; explained involvement of the EnvircnmeDtal
Protection Agency and read letters ~rom Ms. Barbara
D'Angelu, Chief, EPA Wetlands ~ulicy Section, indicating
Aq~ncy did not ~%quir~ any additional info,etlon on the
and that the County was sti!l authorized =o proceed with the
project; and read a letter from Ms. W. J. "Marsh" Zullhoefer of
the Office of Water Resources Manag~ent, Stat~ Water Control
~o~rd citing ~i~information in the m~dia concerning w=tla~d
delineation of th~ Riverton site; stated the debris left in
u~eeks by the contra=tot ha~ been =leered an~ appropriate
action had been =akin to resolve the matter~ and he further
noted ~at %he Riv~rton ~ite did comply with current Chesapeake
Bay P~eservation Act s~anOards. Mr. Tom ~ulgh~,
Superln~end~nt ~or Plannlng and Facilities, School Administra~
tiun, s~afi~=d info,etlon relative to the cos~ analymi~ for
the Riverton site and submitted a copy of said info~%atlcn %c
the Board fo~ ~eview, a espy of which is filed with th~
of the Board.
Discussion, questions and co, ants ensued r~ativ~ to %he data
concerning qualifications of the site regarding %he suitability
procedures ~or development of ~it~s; ability =o comply with
to %he site, and ~nternal access roads~ wh~ther or no~ ~h~
s~bjec% si~e compli=d with EnVirOnmental Pzotectio~ Agency
ACt standards and other governmental agency pef~it approvals;
~he total oost in %h~ r~vised cost analy~i~ material reflecting
the a~itional $2,000,000 Doing requested over the initial
boring data has ascer~in~d ~at soil on this site iu suitable
for con~t~ction and that no undu~ ezpense woul~ be incurred
r~la~ive to foundations of ~chools er construction of parking
lots. When asked~ Mr. McCraoken indicate~ he had nc= had an
opportunity ~o review ~he de,ailed estimates prepared, however~
the $1,248,000 was within the ~anqe of one of staff's original
Mr. Daniel stated h~ understood ~he parents' po$ition~ and
concerns in %his matter; endorsed th=ir co--ants that
child in the Coun%~; ~tat~d h~ felt it necessary to move
forward with the cons%ruction of remaining school
approved in the bond r~f~r~nd~; noted there have been
individuals in ~e rmmainder of the County who have
serious concern~ regarding the economic h~alth of th~
and urged the Board to ensure ~hat %hame projects ar~ completed
within the finan0ial fr~ework approved in the 1988 r~fe~end~
r~ferenced the a~ternoon work sesmion on the budget which
information indicated there will be short~alts but that
90-6~2 ~/1~190
there are alternatives solutions available at tRis time to
acco~odate sa~e but that budgetary constraints must be
exercised; reierenced information provided to him indicating
contingency emounts still unappropriated and urged that ~aid
iunds be appropriated wisely on the remaining five projects and
that the School Administration use every available management
and development technique at its disposal to remain within the
framework of the ce~t that the voters approved~ and indicated,
under proper documentation of a full faith effort, that if the
project were not COmpleted within the available funds, he was
prepared, after the bidding, to assess and make a decision on
the additional appropriation but hoped that, at this point in
tima~ a goal would be established and pursued to cOmplete this
in a no shortfall mode, with all financial data available to
provide an accurate accounting of expenditures.
Mr. Mayes expressed concern that the Board is involved in a
such a decision-making process is not a responsibility of the
Board of Supervisors; that it was clearly indicated in I988,
when the people voted, that there should be a northern ar~a
high school and elementary school; that he supports the schools
and the bend issue as it was pa~s~d; and that he supported Mr.
DanieI~s comments and was confident the Board would rise to the
occasion in the event thoro wet= to be a shortfall.
Mr. Applegate stated there had never been an instance when
~id not support a northern area high school and elementary
school; referenced the 1988 bond referendum after which he
urged that thc process fer site selections begin immediately
but wes not heeded~ stated he felt the overall impac~ of this
situation had bee~ a very expensive lesson for the Connty;
reiterated the responsibility of the School Board for the
selection of school sites but stated it is the responsibility
of the Board of supervisors to approv= and appropriate said
£un~ing in the most economical manner possible an~ in the best
interest of all th= citizuns of th~ County; referenced Mr.
Daniel's remarks regarding the a~ternoon work session on the
budget which information indicated there will be shortfall~ but
that there are elternative solutions available at this time
accommodate same but that budgetary constraiet~ must
exercised; an~ stated he hoped the School Administration would
complete the project within the uonetralnts of the I988 bond
referendum as the voters approved.
Mr. Sullivan stated he ~elt there had been much misinformation
promoted through various sources regarding this sub, eot'and he
felt that un'or/abate;' that"the question before the Bo~rd is
not the selection of the site but whether or not to uuppor~ the
decision of the ~chool Beard and appropriate the funding;
~tated that he ha5 confidence and faith in this School Seard
which is more responsive than previous school Beards; stated
the= he is disappointed there is insufficient support for the
appropriation; however, at the appropriate time, he intended to
propos~ a compromise th~ he feels provides assurances that are
necessary to all~ the p~rchase of the subject property,
allow for the bidding process, to allow the School ~oard end
Administration to make conscious duci$ions and provide them
assurances that, based upon ~heir professional knowledge and
codes, if they experience a shortfall, the Board will support
thom. ~e further read a letter from the ~nvironmentel
Protection Agency regarding their position on this matter and
indicate~ the County intandu, as a matter of ethics and
professicnalium, to abide by ~very law, ordinance er cod~ to
assure that this proper~y ic developed prnDerl~ and for the
benefit of all the citizens. He. stated it is cf the utmost
importance to him tc ensure the provision of the best
educational facilities possible to all children cf this County
and to send those children to overcrowded schools, because
there is a lack of urgency to accomplish these projects, is
80-653 9/12/90
Mr. Currin stated he had served an the School Liaison Committee
with Mr. Sullivan and two School ~eard ~embers for the past two
years end could assure that t~ere is as much concern among the
School Board members regarding the monies spent and the product
produced as there is by any member of the Board of Supervisors,
with respect to the responsible expenditure of the taxpayers'
dollars as well as providing the best possible educational
facilities available to properly edusate the children of this
County. He stated the Board of Supervisors is coI~I~it~ed to the
r~spon~ibility for ensuring that the taxpayers' dollars are
wisely spent, and that, after all the meetings regaiding costs,
revd~wing all the sites and presenting said inforI~ation to this
Board, he could, without hesitation or doubt, support
Sutlivan's motion. 5o further ~tatsd he felt it is time for
Chesterfield County to mov~ forward; that the County has a
School Board with which he is very cenfor~able and in whom he
has confidence.
On motion Of the ~oard, the Boar~ o~ Supervisor~ approved the
School ~oard proceeding with the Northern Area High School and
Elementary School projects. The School Boar~ will use its be~t
efforts to ~und the prelect within its existing budget and the
necessary to complete the pro~ect~ will b~ appropriated by the
Board of Supervisors up to a maximum of $2,000,000 at the time
the lowest acceptable bidder is approved.
Th~ Board being polled, ~he ¥ota was as follows:
Mr. Daniel~ Aye,
Mr. Maye~ : Aye.
Mr. Appl~g~te: Aye.
~r. Sullivan: Aye.
Mr. Currin: Aye.
It was generally agreed to recess for five {5)
13.&. AN k~ND~T TO w~ CODE OF CH~STERFIELD~ 1978, AS
Mr. Micas stated this date and ti~e had been advertised ~or a
pt%blie k~aring to consider an amendment to the Cod~ cf th~
audit fees for bingo and raffl~ permit holders.
permit holders; etc.
On motion of ~r. App~egate, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
AS AMENDED, BY AM~EDING S~CTION 4-33 OF AR~IC~ IV
County that the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
9Q-654
Sac. 4-35, audi~ fse.
Every organization a~tborized to conduct bingo games and
raffles pursuant to this Article ~hall pay an audit fee equal
to two percent of the gross receipts which an organization
reports pursuant to Section 4-32, provided that if the gross
rccelp=s of an organization are less than t~o thousand dollar~
($2,000.00) for the designated reporting period, such audit fee
is waived. "Gro~s receipt$~ as used in fhi~ Section, mean~
th~ total amount o~ money rsceived from bingo, instant bingo,
and raffl~ operations before the deduction of exp~nses or
pri~es. Such audit fee shall be determined by the gross
receipts ahown on the financial report, subject tO c~rrectnes~
by audi~, and shall auuompany such report required to be filed
with the Internal Audit Department on or before NOvember 1 of
each y~ar pursuant to ~eetion 4-~2.
Vote: Unanimous
13.B. AN O~DINA~C~ ~TRICTING SMOKING IN P~LIC ~I~%CES
Mr. Daniel'disclosed to the Board ~hat he is employed by Phklip
Morris, Inc.; that he felt his iUdustry's positien on ~m~kin9
i~ well know~; that he has not discussed tho proposed ordinance
with either the Administration or a~y Boer~ nember; and because
of his employment he would not participate in the discussion
and declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia
Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused him$~i£ from
the meeting.
Mr. Micas stated this da~e and time had been advertised for
public hearing te consider an ordinance restricting smoking in
public places and briefly explained the context of tbs proposed
ordinance and an administrative procedure for County ~moking
Policy as it pertains to County owned and/or leased facilities.
Mr. Paige Sutherland, Regional Director of The Tobacco
Institute~ Mr. Albert Conner, Co-Chairman of the Greater
Richmond ~mokors Righ%~ Gro~p~ Mr. ~rnce Wynn, an employee of
Philip Morris; Mr. Li~wood Hines, representing the Cenclav~ of
Riohmond Pipe ~mokers~ ~r. Brennan ~Cormick; and Mr. David
Riggin, Deputy Controttsr for American Tobacco Company voiced
opposition to the proposed ordinance as they felt a local
ordinance unnecessary that duplicated an ~×i~tlng State law~
expressed concern =hat ~hs existing law be enforced equitably;
they such an ordinance would be dutri~entai to the ~sonomy
cultural heritage of the County; that designated smoking areas
be provided in the workplac~ for smokers; referenced buildings
where smoking is prohibited; referenced the diligent efforts
=nd many meetings that h~d been conducted in efforts to get the
exietlng legislation passed and that the~e was agreement~ at
this time, between those involved that the legislation was
adequate; and regnested the Board consider establishing
~ancy Berger voiced support for the proposed ordinanse as they
felt there should be designated smoking areas within the work
place for individuals who wished to smo~e; indicated they felt
supervised by an .employee who smo~ed~ referenced indiv£du~l
health problems which w~re.comR~iga~ed by cigarette smoke; and
When asked, ar. Rar~ey briefl~ ~l%'i'n~d the proposed
administrative procedure for a County smoking polioy.
Diseu~ion~ questions and comment~ ensued Isle=ire to
proposed ordinance versus e~isting State law; the County
Adminiotrator's smoking policy;
90-655 9/12/90
After fur~h~ discussion, it was on motion of Mr. Sullivan,
seconded by Mr. Appl~gate, that t_he ~o~rd defaa~ ~ke proposed
ordinance ~o amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
1978, as as%ended, rs]sting to smoking in public plac~.
When askedr Mr. Sullivan clarified the motion indicating that
he felt current State law was sufficient to govern this issue
and that he saw no need to consider passage of a local
ordinance that duplicated State law. Mr. Currin moved a
substitute motion, eeconded by Mr. Sullivan, to de£~at the
proposed ordinance to amend the Code of th~ Co~nt~ Of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, relating to smoking in p~'blic
places.
Ayes: Mr. Coffin, ~r. Sullivan, Mr. Appleqate and Mr. Mayas.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
~r. Daniel returned to the meeting~
Mr. ~icas statsd ~his da%e and kime had been advertised ~or a
public hearinq to con~ider a: ~endment to ~he Cods of the
Cop~y of Chesterfield, I978, as ~ded~ relaxin7 ~o a
~eparat~ tax rate for vehicles owned by non-profit
organizations which ~istrib~te meals to the elderly.
NO one =ama fo~ard ~o speak in ~avor of or aqains~ th~
proposed ordinance.
0n motion of Mr. Applegate, ~econded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
C~SSIFI~TION OF CE~AIN~HI~5
~E IT O~ATNED by the Board of Supervisors of chesterfield
Co,ney:
(1) That Section 8 the code of the County ~of Ch=utur-
field, 1978, aa ~ende~, is ~end~d by adding Section ~-13.2 =o
read as followS~
~G. 8~13.2. MOtor vehiole~ owne~ by nonprofit or~ani~ions.
Motor vehicles owned by a n0nprofi: organization and used
to deliver meals ~o homebound per~ons or provide transportation
to senior or handicapped citizens in the co--unity to carry out
classification separatz from other classifications of tangible
personal property.
Vote~ Unanimous
13.D. AN 0P~INANC~ TO A~[~ND T~ CODE OF THE ~0~ OF
21.1-157, 21.1--217 ~ Z~'.~281 ~TIN~ ~ ~
~r. Sate stated this d~t~ and time had be~n adverti~e~ for
public h~aring to consider an ordinance ~o ~mend the Code
the Count~ . Of Ch~.$~erfield t97~, as ~ended~ relating
90-656 9/12/90
temporary outdoor wanders and briefly explained the proposed
~o one came forward to speak in favor of or against tbs
proposed ordinance.
Brief di~e~ssio~, questions and comments ensued relative to
purpose of the proposed ordinance~ redefining the uses
permitted t~mperary Vendors to only prepared food sales ~s
opposed to those uses recommended by the Planning Co~ission;
the ~atiensle for the maximum three [3} coDsecu~ive days per
On motion of Mr. Coffin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
;%NOPJ~INANC~ TO AM~D xn~ CODE OF Twm
COUN'I"/ OF C~ESTERFIELD~ 1978~ AS~H~%~D~)~
BY AME~DINGAND P. EENACTING S~TIONS ~1-3, 21-~0, 2~-1~3~
21.1-I~3, 21.1-157, 21.1-217 AND 21.1-281 RELATING TO
TEMPORARY OUTDOOR%IEN~0R$
BE IT ORDAINED by the Boar~ Of Supervisors of ches=er£iald
County:
{t) That the Cede of the County of Chesterfield, 1978,
~men~ed, i~ ~men~od to read as follows:
For the purposes of this Chap=er, ~he followin~ words and
phrases shall hav~ th~ meanings respectively a~cribed to them
by =hls Section:
o o o
Temporary Qutduor Vendors. Those uses which are operated in
the open or fr~m within temporary or portable structures and
which occur no mor~ frequently than three {3) day~ in any seven
(7) day period beginning on Monday and ending on Sunday~
provided, however, that in no event shmll any such use occur
more frequently than three (3) consecutive days. Temporary
vendors shall be lose=ed where improved permanent parking
facilities are availabl~ for their use. Temporary ven~ors
shall include only prepare~ food Bales.
o o o
Sec. 21-5~. Parking. spaces requirsd.
The minimum number ef parking ~paces to be provided for
Number of spaces
Ix) Temporar~ outdoor Five (5) for each vendor.
Sec. 21-15~. ~ermitted uses ~ B~ right.
(70) Temporary outdoor vendors, subject to the restric-
tions set forth in Suction 21.t~53(h} which are hereby
incorporated herein by reference.
Sea. 21.1-153. Uses permitte~ ~ith oertain ~strictions.
(h) T~mpera;y outdoor vendors, provided that=
90~657 9/12f90
{1} A temporary vendor shell be permitted only on a
lot or parcel occupied by a legal permanent ~se.
(2) A temporary stand not to exceed two hundred
square feat in area and one properly licensed, in~pected and
operative truck or other vehicle may be placed or parked on
site, when utilized for such temporary sales.
(3) Outside display of merchandise for sale is
permitted; provided, however, that any portion cf the sales
area shell be located in accordance with the minimum yard
depths {setbacks) required for the district.
(4) The required minimum and most convenient parking
spaces for the existing permanunt ua= uhall not bu usud for tho
temporary vendor.
{5~ Signs shall be permitted only in accordance with
Article VIII of this Chapter.
(6} Any temporary structure, vehicle, siqn, trash,
debris or uther material aeseciated with or ree~ltlng ~rom such
temporary Sales use shall be removed from the lot or parcel nO
later than twenty-four (24) hours following th~ close of the
temporary sale,
(7) Ail temporary ven~er areas shall be locate~ a
minimum of one hundred (100) feet from any residentially zoned
preperty or any property where the principal use is residential
unless the temporary sales a~ea is separated from such property
by a permanent building.
(~) Hours cf operation for temporary outdoor vendors
shall be restricted to ~he hours of operation of the permanent
use on the parcel.
sec+ 21.1-1S?. Required conditions.
~n a~iticn to the other requirements of this Chapter, the
following conditions shall b~ m~t in {h~ C-2 district:
(b) ~xcept a~ otherwise provided in Section 21.1-153(h),
no outside display of merchandise for sale is permitted unless
located within Covered sidewalk~ or courtyard areas and such
areas are designed for such use and pedestrian ways are main=
t~ine~.
o e o
Sec. ~.1-~7. 9arkin~ s~ac~$ re~ulx~d.
~xcspt as pro¥ided for in Section ~1.1-255.4.(a), th~
numbur oi parking spaces to be providud for each use shall be
USE
o o o
other:
(~) Temporar~ outdoor P~ve (5) for each vendor.
vendors
See. 21.I~2]1. Definitions.
For the purposes of ~his Chapter, the following wor~ and
phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them
by ~his Section:
90-658 9/12/90
m
m
~emp~rary outdoor vendors. Thoae .u~es ~hioh are operated in
the open or from within temporary or portable structures and
which occur nc more frequently then throe (3} days in any seven
(7) day Deriod beginning On Nonday and ~nding on Sunday;
provided, however, that in no event shall any snch use occur
more frequently than three (3) cons~0utive day~. Temporary
vendors shall be located where improved permanent parking
facilitie~ e~e a~&ilable for their gge. Temporary vendors
shall include only p~epared food ~ales.
Vote: Unanimous
13.E. AN O~DINANCE TO ~ C~;~EK,~,,, 21, x~ CO.D.E. O~ T~ CO~
21-~7.33.1 ~TING ~ V%~ DIS~CT ~ ~QUZ~NTS
~r. Sale ~tated this da~ and ~ime had be~n adv~r=is~d for a
p~lic hearing to consider an o~dinance to ~end Chad%er 21 of
the Cod~ of ~ County of chestmrfield, 1978, a~ amended,
NO one c~e fo~ard to speak in fa~or of or against the
proposed ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board
adopted th~ following ordinance~
AS ~, BY ~INN S~TXON ~1-67.33.1,
B~ IT O~AI~D by %h~ Boar~ of Supervisors of Chestezfield
( t ~ That Chapter 21 of the Code of ~he... Coun~
Chmsterfiel~, 1978, as ~ended, is ~ended and re-enuct=d
follows:
Sec. 21-67.33.1. Yard Requlrement~.
For yard requirement ~, se~ Chapter 21.1, Article 6,
Division 4, Sections 21.1-255.5 f~r B District8 and 21.1-255.6
Vote: Unanimous
C~ST~I~FITM, 1978, AS AM~RD~ BY .AMI~D__ ~NG ~
]~NACTING SECTIONS 18.1-2 AND 18.1-T~,a z'l~ P~L~TING G~ERALLY
Mr. Sale ~ta~d this d~te and tim~ had bean advertised for a
public hearing to conaider an ordinance %o ~mend the Cod~ of
the coqa~ of Chesterfield, 1978, a~ amended, relating
generally to ~divisions.
NO one Came forward to speak in favor of or agains= =he
proposed ordinance.
On motion of ~r. Sullivan, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
adopted the ~otlowing rssolution:
90-659
~ COUNT~ 0~' C~Z~:'~BI~ 1978~ AS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board o~ Supervisors Oi chesterfield
County:
(1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is a~endad and rasnan~od ~o road aa
Eeo. 18.1-2. Definitions.
In the construction of this Chapter, the definitions
contained in this go~tion shall bo observed and applied, except
when the context clearly indicates otherwise:
Amended Plat. A re~ubdivision of a re~ord~ subdivision
which does not involve a'chang~ in property lines. Resubdivi-
mions which may be made by an amended plat include, but are
not limited to, name changes and corrections relating to mete~
and bound~ deseriptions~ correction of flood plain lines,
setback l~nes, drainage easements, mlsnumbered lots and mis-
spelled words.
~esubdlvlson. ~n authorixed change in a recorded subdivi-
sion w-~ doe~ not involve the relocation or alteration of
streets, alleys, easements for public p&~aqe or other public
sec.18.1-14~ Resnbdivision.
(a) A resubdivi~ion of all or any part of a recordod
subdivision may not be made or recorded until submitted and
approved by the Plannin~ Commission or agent in accordance with
the provisions of this Chapter.
(n} An amended plau may be submitted to the agent for
approval end recordation pursuant to section 18.1-16 (1) (c) and
(d} without the tentative approval o~erwise required by
S,ction
Vote: Unanimous
14.A. AUTHORIZE COUNTXADMINIST~ATORTO~-(RCUTECONT~ACT TO
ar. ~icas stated ~he contract far the pu~¢han~ ~f the Riverton
site ha~ b~en executed by the seller and briefly axDlained
aspect~ of the negotiated ~ontract.
There was discussion relative to the identity of the
contractor; whether or not all the necessary provisos to
protect the County were included in the contract; etc. Mr,
Daniel stated he wQuld lake, in tho futUre~ to have all major
contracts provided to gte Board for their review prior to the
~eeting$ ~or Board action. Mr. Sullivan stated that the Board
has informed the School Board, in good faith, tha~ they ers
expected to bring forth ~aid sontract within budget; furthef~
90-660
i
tha~ if a shortfall doe~ occur, tbs Board may provide the
necebsa~y funds; and he felt the only course left was to
proceed.
On motion of Mr. S~llivan, seconded by Mr. Cu~rin, the Board
authorized the County Administra%or ho execute a contract to
purchase approximately 153 asrs$ of the Riverton subdivision to
con~Sruct a hiqh school, elementary school and waterfront park
for $4,000,000, subject to approval by the County Attorney.
Vets: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel Stated he would like tc have had an opportunity to
review the c~n%ract prior to this mobbing and that he was not
aware of the co~te~tp. Mr. Micas stated this contract ha~ b~en
under negotiation for ~ev~ral moD~hs and assured the Board that
said contract included every e~pect the Board requested to be
addressed and in completely consistent with every direction
that the Board mad~ to staff.
14.B.P. ESOLUTIONTO CONSIDER Ci~EATION OF TH~ C~TRAL VIRGINIA
On motion of MS. Daniel, seconded by Mr. ~ulllvan, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Thc County of chesterfield, V~rqinf~ {"County")
has participated in the Richmond/Tri-Ci~ies Area Solid Waste
Task Force created by the Richmond Reqional Planning District
Commission ("RRPDC"]; and
WHEREAS, The Task For~e an~ both the ~PDC and Crater
Planning Diseriet CoK~isslcn have unanimously adopted the
recommendation to establish the Central Virginia Waste
Management Authority ("Autheuity"); and
WHgR/~A$, On April 25, 1990, tbs Count~ Board of
Supervisors, upon proper public notice iD compliance with the
virginia Wa=er and Sewer Authorities Act, held a ~ubllc hearing
on the adoption of Articles of I~¢orpcr~ion for the Authority
and adopted, by resolution, the A~f~les ~f Incorporation; and
WHEREAS, The Ar~icl~a of Incorporation we?e neither
adopted by all 13 participating local governments nor forwarded
to the State Corporation Co~unission for approval~ and
WHEREAS~ O~ July 12, 1990, the RRPDC recoi~mended new
Articles oi Incorporation to participating local government~
for their consideration; and
WHEREAS, The now Artiole~ of Incorporation provide ~er the
appointluent of additional members and alternates to the initial
Board of Director~ from th~ County.
NOW, THEP~PORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Chesterfield Coun=y
5ea~d of Supervisors ~hat:
1. The Board's resolution of April 25, 1990 adopting
Articles oi Incorporation for the Authority is hereby
rescinded.
2. The Board this 12th ~ay cf September, 1990~ finds and
declur=s it in the public interest fO join together with
several other jurisdictions in the ar~a to form a public
service authority, to be named the Central Virginia Waste
Management Authority, ~ur~nant to the pru~isions of the
Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities Act, being Chapter 28,
Title I~.1, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, in the manner
and for the purposes set forth therein,
90-661
3. The Board hereby expre~$e~ its intent to appoint the
following members and their respective alternates to serve on
the Board of Directors of the Authority for a term commencing
upon incorporation of the Authority and expiring on the dates
set forth below:
INITIAL TERM
ALTERNATES
4. The Board shall told a public hearing to consider
adoption, by resolution, of the final Articles of Incorporation
for the Authority and hermby anthorize~ the County
Administrator or his designee to place a public notice
advertise~lent, as r~quired by ~ection 15,1-1243 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, in the Richmond Times-Dispatch to
public hearing date. Th~ Connty Administrator ~hall not
advertise the hearing until ~he County hae receive~ from the
RRPDC new Articlm~ of Incorporation which include~ a complete
list of appointees to the initial ~oard of Director~ of the
Authority. Upon receipt of said Articles, the Connty
Administrator shall select zhe earlies~ possible public hearing
dot= concurrent with a regularly-scheduled muetin§ of the Board
oon$istent with the public notification requirements of the A=t
and advertise the hearing as referenced in this Section.
5. The Board reque~t~ the County Administrator to
forward a co~y of this resolution to the ~xeoutlve Director of
the RRPDC within five days of its adoption.
Vote: Unanimous
14.C. APPROVAL OF TA~ ~T COMMERCIAL NOTE FOR ACQUISITION OF
CO){PUTMR EQ~IPME~TFOR D~ARTM~TOFM~N~'}{]~%LTH/~IE~TAA
On motion of ~r. Mayas, saconde~ by ~r. Sullivan, the ~card
authorized the County Administrator to execu=e all necessary
documents to secure $96,~00 in =ax-exempt financing for the
Department of ~ntal H=alth/Mental Retardation and substance
Abuse (DM~MRSA) computer equipment in FYPl, subjec~ to approval
by th~ County Attorney; and appropriated $96~50Q for said
computer equipment from the proceeds from ~he finaDciug, (It
is noted the total cost of the new my~tem will b~ app~eximatel~
$152~000; that the Department o~ ~ntal B~alth/~en~al
Retardation and Substance Abusers current budget ha~ sufficient
f~n~s in the amount of $55,000 to cover loan pa~ents during
FY91, with payment~ scheduled to begin October 15, ~990, if the
financing i~ approved; and that ~otal pa~ents f~ FY92 will bs
$36,400 and for FX93, $41,400,)
~F~TY TRAININ~ ~ACILITIES (NON-ACAD~IC}
On mo=ion of Mr. Apptsgat~, seconded by ~r. Damiel, tho Board
awarded an engineering deeign contract to J. K. Ti~mone, Inc.,
for the design cf the new Public Safety Training Facility
(Non-Acad~micl, which contract will be divided in~o two (2}
phases with a total not to e~ceed $3~0,$00 and is fuD~ed from
the ~988 Bon~ Referendum.
14.F. AUT~OP~$F TH~ CR~ATION OF FIVE NURSING POSITIONS FOR
Hr. Ha~er ~xpl~in~d ~he ~x~s~ing contract wi~h a private
vendor for tho provision o~ medical ~ervices fo= jell inma=e~,
which has be~n te~inated by the vendor eff~ctiv~ Octob~ 1,
1990~ th~ provt$i0n~ of services provided by Cu~n~y
which can be realized at a cost savin~s;
quality of medical ~ervic~ fur jell i~ate$; the
re~ponsibilit~ for the dispensing of medications; Deputy triage
procedures~ the availability of the on-call A~ini~trator
and/o~ DOctOr as well as ~ us~ of local hospitals for
between projected, expenditures an~ remaining FYPl funds being
expendi~ures~ the r~ification~ o~ liability that could be
v~ndor and inquired a~ to the problems, sheriff Minton
for desiring to change service~. Concerns reqarding the
liability that would be incurre~ ~ ~ County were
and sugge~tion~ tk~t the current, contract be e~{~ded to
~ituation ~n e~ten$1v~ 4etail, etc. Sheriff Minto~
analysis it was determined tha~ quality medical services could
Mr. Mayes also expresse~ concern regarding :he liability the
b~ provided indicating that such medical services would
adequate if approved.
0n motion of ~r. Applega~e, seco~dmd by Mr. ~ayes, th~ Board
the end of Nove~er, 1990.
Ayes: Mr. Currin, ~r. Applegat~, Mr. Daniel and Mr,
Abstention: Mr. Sullivan.
ld.G, CONHEtq~ ITE{¢9
14.G.I. REQUESTS FOR BII~GO/RAFFIHE PEPd~ITS
On motion cf Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr, ~ayes, the ~oard
approvsd reguest~ for bingo/raffle per~it~ for the following
organization~ for calendar year 1990:
~RGANI~ATION .. TY~.
National Society to ~revent Blindness Raffle
Ma~ch~ster Volunteer R~scue Squad, !nc. Raffle
90-663 9/12/90
Saint Augustine Parish
Vote: Unanimous
Bingo/Raffle
14.G.2. SET DATES FOR ~IC ~k~/NG~
C~'~Y P~SE~TION ACT
On motion of Mr. Applegate~ seconded by M~. M~ycu~ thc Board
set the date of October 10, 1990, at 7:00 p.m., fez a public
hearing to con~ider an Ordinance ~undment relative to the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act.
Vote: Unanimous
14.8.2.b. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING
PEi~OE~-L PI%OPE~TX TAX CLASSIFICATION FOR MOTOR
On me,ion O~ ~r. Applegate, seconded by ~r. ~aye~, ~e ~oard
s~t %he date of October 24, 1990, at 9:00 a.m., for a public
h~aring =o consider an ordinance establishing separate personal
property tax classi~icatlon for motor vehlcle~ o~ed by m~bers
of rescue squads and volunteer fire depar~ents.
Vote: Unanimous
14.G.2.C. TO CONSIDER I.F-~SING THR or-n COuRTHOU$~ I~IiILDING TO
0n motion of Mr. Applegate~ seconded by Mr. ~ayes, the Board
Set the date of 0c~ober 10, 1990, at 7:00 p.m., for a public
hearing to consider leasing ~e Old Courthouse Building to the
~istorical Society and Muse~ Board.
Vot~: Unan~ou~
14.G,2.d. TO CONSIDER A~OLITION OF 'rii.~ JOHNSON'S CRlfa~ I~P,A/NAGE
DEFELOPM~I~TDI~TtLICT
Mr. Currln disclosed to the ~onrd thnt ha owns approximately
thr~e-fourths of an acre which may be within the proposed
Johnson's Creek Drainage District and dr~in~ to Johnson's
Creek, declared a potential conflict of interest pursuant to
the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused
himself from the meeting.
On motion of ~r. Appl~9~te, ~econ~ed by Mr. Coffin, the Board
set the date of October 10, 1990, at 7:00 p.m., for a public
hearing to consider abolition of the Johnson's Creek Drainage
Development District.
Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr~'Appleqate, ~r. Daniel and Mr. Mayas..
Abaent: Mr. Curriu.
ar. Currin returned to the meeting.
14.G.2.e. TO CORSIDERAR ORDINANCE REGARDIMG Tn~ RELOCATION OF
On motion of Mr. Applegate~ ~econded by Mr. Mayes~ the Board
sst th~ date of October 10, 1990~ at 7=0Q a.m., for a public
hea~ing tO ton~ider an ordinance reqardinq the relocation of
the Central Absentee Voter District.
1~,~.~. ~TATEROA~ACC~PT;~C~
Thi~ day the County E~virunmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from thi~ Board, made report in writing UpOn his
examination of Grove Park Court, Midtothian District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Applegate,
seconded by Mr. Mayer, it i~ resolved that Grove Park
Midlothian District, be and it hereby is established es a
public road.
And be it further re~olved, that the Virgini~ Depar~men~ of
Transportation, be and it hereby i~ re, nested tO take into the
Secondary System, Stove Pa~k Court~ beginning at the inter-
section with Grove Rea~, State Route 86~, and going easterly
0.12 mile to end in a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slop~, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
This road serves as an access for adjacent oo~ercial
properties.
An~ be it furthe~ resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantee~ to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50~
right-of-way for this road.
Grove Park Court i~ recorded as follows:
Dedication of Grove Park Court. Plat Book 1653, Page 1572, May
Vot~; Unanimo~
This day the County Environmental E~ineer, in accordance with
direotion~ from thi~ ~oard, made report in writing upon his
examination Of Harbour Bill Road and Harbour Hill Place in
Harbour ~ill, Clover Hill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Appleqete,
seconded by ~r. Mayas, it is resolved that ~arb~ur ~ill Road
and ~arbou~ Mill Place in ~erbour ~i11, Clover ~iti District,
be end they hereby are established as public
And be it furth~ re~olvsd, that the Virginia D~par~ment of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Harhcur Sill Road, beginniug at the inter-
section with Harbcur Pointe Parkway, State ROUte 2023, and
qoing northerly 0.04 mile to the intersection with Spinnaker
Cove Road, =hen turning and going northeasterly 0.0{ mile, then
turning ~n~ going easterly Q.05 mile Co en~ at ~he intersection
with Harbonr ~ill Place; and Harbour Hill Plaee~ b~ginning at
the intersection with ~arbour ~ill Road add going northeasterly
0.04 mile to the intersection with itself, then continuing
northeasterly 0.04 mile, th~n turning an~ going westerly
mile, then turning and going southeasterly 0.03 mile to end at
the intersection with itaelfi. Again, Harbour Hill Place
beginning at the inter, action ~ith ~rbour Hill Road and going
~ouCherl~ O.07 mile to en~ in a
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Departmxnt of Transporhatlon drainage
These roads serve 20 lots.
90-665
9112190
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervi~orm
guarantees to the virginia Department ef Transportation an 80'
right-of-way for Marhour Hill RO~d amd a $0' right-of-way for
Harbear Hill Place.
Harbour Hill is recorded as follows:
~lat Book 43, ~age~ 72 & 73, August ~ 1983.
Vote~ Unanimous
Thlm day the Count~ Environmental ~ngin~e~, in accordance with
directions 9rom this Board, made report in writing upon his
~x~mination of Leren Drive, Loren Court and ~lue Rock Drive in
Pr~stwould Farms, S~cticn L, Bermuda District.
upon consideration whereof, and mn motion of Mr. Applegate,
seconded by ~r. Mayas, it AS resolved that Loren Drive, Loren
CO~t, And Blue ROCk Drive in PrSStwould F&rmS, S~ctien L,
~exmuda District, be and they hereby ars eetablishe~ as publio
roads.
And be it f~rther resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and At hereby As ra~uastsd to take into the
Secondary Sys%em~ Loren Drive~ beginning at eximting Loren
Drive, State Route 2100~ and going ~outherly 0.~8 male, then
turning and going easterly 0.DS mile to the intersection with
Lor~n Court, then con,in,lng easterl~ 0.09 mile to the inter-
section with Blue Rock Drive, then continuing easterly 0.05 to
tie into Whitt~y Street~ State Route 3232; Loren Court,
beginning at =he in=ersectlcn with Leron Drive sod going
northerly ~.05 mile te end in a cul-de-sac; and Blue Rock
Drive, b=ginning at the interaeetion with Lor~n Drive and going
northerly ~.12 mil~ %O end in a cul-de-sac. Again, Blue Rock
Drive, beginning a~ the intersection with Loren Drive an~ gO~ng
southerly 0.04 mile, then turning and going w~sterl~ 0.07 mile
to end in a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia D~partmsnt of Transportation drainaqe
These roads serve 90 lots.
And be it further resolved~ that the ~oard of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for all of ~hese roads.
This seotion of Prestwould Farms is recorded ae follows=
Section L. Plat Book 61, Page 60, May 19, 1988.
This day the County ~nviror~sntal Bnqineer, in ~cccrdan=e with
directions from this ~oard, made report in writing upon hi~
examine=ion of Spinnaker Cove Road in Spinnaker Cove, Section
2, Clover Hill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and On mO%ion of Mr. Appl~qate,
seconded by Mr. Mayes~ it is resolved ~ha~ ~pinnaker C~v~ Road
in Spinnaker Cove, Section 2, Clover Hill District, be and it
hereby is e~tabllshed as a public road.
And be it further rssolvad, that t~ virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it h~reby is requemt~d to take into the
Secondary System, Spinnaker Cove Road, beginning at the inter~
section with Marbour Hill Road, State Route number to be
assigned, and going northwesterly 0.86 mile, then turning amd
i
i
i
going northerly 0.O6 mile, then turning and going northeasterly
8.04 mile to end in cut=de-sec.
This request is inclusiv~ of the adjacent slope, Sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
This road serves 22 lots.
And be it further resolved, that ~hs Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation
right-of-way for this road.
This section of Spinnaker Cove is recorded a~ follows:
Vote: Unanimous
This day the Ce~nt~ Environmental Engineer, in acoordanee with
directions from this Board, made report in writinq upon his
ex~ination of Quisenber~y Street in ClarendOn, Section Z,
Clover Hill District.
Upon conaiduration whereo~, and on motion of Mr. Apptsgate,
~econded by Mr. Mayas, it i~ resolved that Quisenberry Street
in clarendon, Section I, Clover Bill District, be and it h~reby
is established as a public road.
And be it further r~selve~, that the Virginia Department Of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
S~condary System, Quisenberry $~reet, beginning at existing
Q~isonberry street, State Route 2114, and going ~orthsrl~ 6.~1
mit~ to end in a t~mporary turnaround.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainag~
And be it further resolved, that the ~oard of S~pcrvisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for this road.
This section of Clarendon is r~oorde~ as follows:
$~otion I. Plat Book 63, Page 29, Ssptembe~ 30, 1988.
Vote: Unanimous
14.G.4. ~OLUTION COR~IP~-TNG P~(~ ~-,INGS OF C~STERFL~LD
INDUSTRX~.~ D~Om~NT AUTHORITY ~OR ISSUANCE' bF
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by ~r. Nayes, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, The Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Chesterfield (the Authority) has considered the
application o~ 0 & K Rolltreppen Gmh~r or its subsidiary to be
formed~ O s E E~ealator$, Incorporated (the Company) for the
issuance of the Antherity's Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds in an a~ount not to exceed $5,200,000 (the Bonds}, to
acquire, cons%rust and equip a facility for the manufacture of
escalators, eutowalks and ~ir~ilar equipment (the Project) in
chesterfield County, Virginia and has held a public hearing
thereon on September 12, 1990~ and
90-667 9/12/90
WMEREAg, The Authority has requested the Board Of
Supervisors (the Board) o~ Chesterfield County, Virqiuia {ths
County), approve the ieeuance of the Bonds in order to comply
with Section 147(f) of the Internal R~venue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), and to apply to the Allocation
Section lS.l-l~99.10 ~t. seq. of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, and applicable re~ulation$ adopted by the
the issuance of the Bonds, subject to terms to b~ agreed upon,
a record of the public hearing and a "fiscal impact statement"
with respect to the Project have been filed with the Board.
1. The Board hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds
5y the Authority for the benefit o~ t/is Company to the extent
required by Section 14Y(f) of the Code, to permit the Authority
to e~sist i~ the financing o~ the ~roject.
3. Approval of issuance of ~he sends, as required by
as amended, ~he Bonds shall provide ~hat neither the County nor
the Authority ~hall b~ obligated to pay th~ bonds or the
intersst thereon or other co~t~ incidsnt thereto exe~pt from
the revenues and moneys pledged therefor, and neither the faith
nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto.
its adoption.
On mo~ien of ~r. Appleg~%e, ~eoonded by ~r. ~aye~, th~ ~oard
Fund for the paving of a~ alley in Chester conneotln9 with
Route 10 and runnln~ behind the businesses on Centre Street and
adopted eke following resolution:.
W~E~EA~, Th~ =itizens have asked %h~ Board .of Supervisors
to pave the alley in Chester which connects to Route l0 and
run~ behin~ the businesses locate~ alonq Centre Street.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors r~qnests th~ Virginia Department of
Tran~portttion to pave the alley ~ith the cost to the County
14.G.6. PEDESTRIAI~ ACTIIATED TRAFFIC $I~[~%.~S Ol~ I~UT]~ t0 T~RODGH
appropriated $12~000 from the Be~uda District Three Cent Road
Fund for the installation of pedestrian actuated traffic
signals at hh~ Route lO/Centre Street/~arrowgate
intersection and adopted the folIowinq reeolntion:
WHEREAS, The widening of Route 18 through Chester is
nearing completion;
WMEP~A$, Significant pedestrian activity is anticipated at
the Route 10/Centre street/Barrowqate Road intersection.
NOW, ?HEP~FOF~E SE IT RESOLVED, the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of
Transportation %o install pedeetrian actuated traffic signals
at this intersection with the cost to the County not to exceed
$12,000.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, ~eeonded by Mr. Mayas, the Board
~ppropriated $9,000 from the Mate&ca Dietrich Thr~e Cen~ Read
Fund to install landscaping on ehe Route 36 Grad~ Separation
Broject in ~ttrick and adopted the following re~olution:
WHEREAS, The construction of th~ ~eute 36 Grade Separation
in ~t~rick is nearing completion; and
W~=REAS, Th~s facility will eliminate a long-standing
safety hazard, improv~ traffic flow and promot~ 9conomic
~veloDment in the Village of Ettrick; and
WH~A$, The provi~ion of landscaping on the proj~ut will
further enhance the beneiits o~ the project %o ~h~ co,unity.
NOW, T~PORE BE IT ~SOLV~D~ 9ha~ ~he ~oazd r~ue~ts the
Virginia Depar~ent o~ Transportation to ins~atl landscaping on
Vote: Unanimou~
COUNTY FAI~..~..S~IATIONFOR P~ESE~-A~(~OF A CI~US
On me,ion of Mr. Applega~, ~econ~e~ by Mr. Mayas, the Board
approved a request for the Chesterfield County Fair ASsociation
fOX an unt~rtalnmen= permit ~o co-sponsor the Car~n and Barnes
County Fairgrounds, subject to satisfactory comple~ion of all
required inspections and s~mi~io~ of p~opsr insurance
certificates. (It is noted a copy of a letter from CoUnty
Schools noting their approval o~ scheduling the even~ is filed
Va%e: Unanimous
14.G.9. ~SOLUTIONP~QUE~TIN8 x~ SC~O0~ ~ARD TO ID~I~Y
WHE~AS, Recent reductions in the rate of increase in
local revenue will result in a local r~venue shortfall
$9,764,400; and
WHE~A$, The County has identified financial reserves of
$4~300~00O to partially offset ~% r~venue reduction, 19avlng
net shortfall of $5,464,400: and
90-669 9/12/90
WPEREA$, The mperatinq portion cf the transfer to mchools
WEEFd~AS, The County has initiated hudqet reductions
totalling $2,748,600.
~OWr THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEDt %hat tke Board of
Supervisors respectfully requests that the Seh0ol Board
identity reductions in the expenditure of local funds totaling
$2,715,800 for Fiscal Ysar 1991.
Vote: Unanimous
14.K. CO~9~NITY DEVELOPI~T ITEMS
14.H.1. RESOLUTION ON PROPOSED REGIONAl, TAXICAB SERVICES
On motion o£ Mr. Applegat~, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
%~H~_e%~, The Chesterfield County Board of ~uperviso~s
concurs in the fin~in~ cf the Richmond Regional Planning
District Conu~ission's Taxicab Committee that:
ta×ic~b $~rvice in th~ Rfehmond Region suffers from
high taxicab fares, lack of service availability, and
aocessibili=y, and poor image; and
o these problems have direct impacts' on the w~ll-belng
and quality of life in the Region, including lost
economic opportunities, poor marketing image for the
Region, increased costs of doing business, and
failnre tn provide accessible, affordable, add
'dependable services for transportation depend~nt
market; and
o taxicab problems require an aDpropriate level of
government ~ntervention in the taxicab market to
corr~t defioi~nciee and to stimulate private
problems; and
o this in~erv6ntinn demand~ specific programs and
actions, not further studies; an~
agency for ~clely addressing taxicab problen~ is not
~peeific regulatory and p~ogranu~atic change~ tm
influence investment patterns an~ operational
characteristics of the local fan,cab industry are
attempted; and
o the formation o~ a Capital Region Taxicab Advisory
Committee under the auspices of %he Richmond Regional
Planning D~stri~t Commission and the establishment Qf
a Regional Taxicab Services Program to develop and
coordinate the impiementatiOn of ~Decific programs
~or i~prcv£ng %~xieab oervice~ i~ recommended.
NOW, TH~FOR~ ~E IT R~SOSVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors ~upports the Richmond Regional
Planning District Co~missien's fore, atica of a Regional Taxicab
8ergice~ Program and intends to financially participate in this
On motion cf Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr+ Applega~c, the ~card
approved and authorized the Chairman of the Beard of
Supervisors to present a statement to +JiB Virgialn Department
of Transportation at a location and ds~ign public hearing
~cheduled for September 27, 1990, at 7:~0 p.m., at the Tholma
Crenshaw Elementary School, located at 11901 Bailey Bridge
Road, to consider the proposed widening of North Bailpy Bridge
Rood from Claypoint Road tn Hull Street Road, a copy of which
statemsnt is filed wi=h the papers of this Board.
Vote; Unanimous
14.H.3. STREET 5IC4{T INST~?J.~TION COHT APPROVA3~
On motion cf Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Currin, the Board
approved the cost for a street light in,tat!orion at N. Arch
Road and Redbridge Road, with funds in the amount cf $3,092.00
to be expended from the Clover Hill District street Light Fund,
Votez Unanimous
14.I. ~TILITIES DEPAR~NT ITEMS
14.I.1. ~XT~NSIONS OF ~LIC WATER AND/OR SEWER SERVI~ TO
Biscusslon, questions and comments en~ued relative to the
proposed program for ex, ending public water and/or sewer
msrvice to existing subdivisions as an alternativa to th~
current policy of financing the extension of these $~rvicem via
assessment/development districtB; components of the pro~osed
program; financing options; consideration of soliciting publi=
input if the Board were to consider makinq such a ~iqnificant
change in policy and deferring the ~t~r to allow for the
scheduling cC a public hearing; providing the Board at its next
m~eeing wi~h informaeion relative to t_he number of existing
~ubdivi~ion~ without water and sewer servic~ and the
anticipated costs for providing such servicms; e%c. ~r. ~aye~
stated he felt the proposed program was fair and in the best
interest of the health, safe~y and wmlSa~e of ~he citizens of
thc County and that %h~ ~oard ~hould proceed with ~ctlon on
0n motion cf Mr. D~iel, meconded by ~r. sulliPan, the Board
deferred until S~pt~er 26, 1990, at 9:00.a.m., consideration
of %he extenmiona of public water andfo~ sewer service to
e~is%ing ~ubd~visions to allow further r~view~
14.I.~. ¢ONSID~ ~QU~BT TO EXTEND WA~'~R ~RVIC~ TO -A-~
t~4AINDEROF GLEBE POINT S~BDI~T~ION
Nr. Sal~ briefly explained the proposed r~qu~t
Subdivision r~sidents of ~kybir~ Road and Skybird Cour~ who are
public services in their area; d~cr~bed existing County policy
regarding s~e; and noted, if the Board wiBh~d tO approve said
request, funding could be transferred irom the ~hysic ~ill'~
Droje~t as that wa~er tank was do~sized
ability to purchase.water from the City of Ric~ond.
90-671 9/12/90
Aftsr some disoussien of the matter, it was on motion of Mr.
Sullivan, sscended by Mr. Daniel, resolved that the Board defer
until September 26, 1990, at 9:00 a.m., consideration of the
request to extend water services to the remainder of Glebe
Point Subdivision, which would be considered in conjunction
with the consideration of extensions of public water and/or
~ewer g~rvie~ ~0 existing s~h~ivisions.
Vote: Unanimous
14.I.3. CON~ENT ITE~kq
14.I.3.a. ~ET A DATE FOR t P~l)LIC H~A~INS ~O CONSIDER ~'~
A~U~NDONMENT OF A I~ORTION OF ~ROAD
On motion of Mr. D~niel~ seconde~ by ~r. Apple~a~e, th~ Board
adopted tht fellewinq rezelution:
Resolution of the County o£ CheSte~field'S i~t~tion to
consider a Resolution and Order to abamden a portion of Sambar
Road.
Pursuant tQ ~ectioa 33.1-151 of th~ Coda of Virginia,
1950~ as amend~d~ be ~t resolved that the Ches~er~leld County
Board of Supervisors hereby gives notice that at a r~gular
meetinq to be held on 0o%ober 24~ I990, it will consider a
Resolution and Order to abandon a per%ion of Samhar Road, more
fully described a~ follows;
A portion of Sambar Rea~, Route 2034, within
D~erfield Ms~a~es ~ub~ivi~ion and R~$ubdivimion
O~ Portion of Section B, as mhown on a plat
prepared by Virginia Surveys, ~a~ed April 15,
1977, a copy of which is attached to thim
resolution.
Accordingly, the Clerk of the ~oard shall ssnd a copy of
this resolution to the State Transportat±e~ Commissioner
thereof. The Clerk shall ~urther canes to be Dnbli~hed and
posted the required notic~g of the Board's intention tc abandon
this portion.of sambar Read.
14.I.3.b. Ai~ROVAL OF ~¥~LOPER~$T~T~I~N~ ~/~RTICIPATION
0n motion Of Hr. Daniel, seconded by ~r. Appleg~, the Board
approved a Wa~tewater Participation Agreement (~89-0~88),
reflecting participation Irom devetope~, R, E. collier, Inc.,
for the extension of the public wastewater system in
~o reimburse the County an e~t~at~d cc~t of~ $85,766.50 for
wa~tewat~r lin~ inmtalled through St. Regent's Lake, Section
2, prior to the ~irs~ 0onneo~ion being made to the
lin~s; an~ authorized the County A~inistrator to execute any
necessary documents ~or said
14.~.$.¢. REQI,~EST FO~ PEP/4ISSION TO STOR~ ~/'OOD CNIPS IN A
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, =he Board
d~nied a request.~rom Mr. Curtis Y. Cox for a license agreement
to allow the storage of wood chips within a portion of an
90-672 9/12/90
unimproved County right-of-way known as Woodside Road. {A copy
of maid plat im filed wi~h the papers of this Board.}
V0te~ Unanimous
14.~.?.~. CON%q~YANCE OF~] F2~SP/~T~ T0%r~G/NIAEL~CTP~ICAND
POWER CUMPANYAT ~I~B~D~ SCH~
On motion of Mr. Daniel, Seconded by Mr. App!~gate, the ~oard
approve~ ~ conveyance of an easement agreement with ~irqinia
Electric and Powe~ Company for ~e installation of underground
cable wi~in a 15 foot easement a= Bailey Bridge Middle School,
in conjunction with providing ~lectrical service to the middle
necessary doo~en=s for said agreement. {A copy of sai~ plat
is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.~.3.e. ACCEPTANCE OF TWO PAH~ELS OF ~AND A~ONG FORDHAM ROAD
FROM F~q~ROOKA~B~CI3kTES
On motion of Mr. Daniel, ~oeon~ed by Mr. Applega~e, the Board
a0oepted On behalf of the County the conveyance cf two parcels
cf land, t0gptber containing 0.422 acre, along the east line of
Fordham Road in ctoveT Hill District from Fsrnbrook A~ociat~,
A Virginie S~neral ~artnership, aad authorized the County
Administrator to execute the necessary deed. (A copy of said
plat is filed with tho papers of the Boar~.l
Vote: Unanimous
.1,4,;I.3.f. ~CCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG GOOL~BY A~
0n motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
acce~tud on behalf of th~ County the conveyance Of a .103 acre
parcel of land along th~ northern s~e o~ Goolsby Avenue and
west of Jefferson Davia Highway from Mr. Willie O. Grubb and
MS. France~ B. Grubb an~ authorized the County A~inis~rator to
14.I.3.9. ACCePTAnCE OF D~.D OF D~DICATION ALONG H~LL
On me,ion of ~r. Daniel, s~conded bI Mr~ Appleqat~ the Board
accepted on behalf of the County the conveyance of a 2Q
strip of land along H~ll Street Road from ~oco 0il Company, A
Maryland Corporation, and au~orized the County A~inistrator
to execute the necessary deed of dedication, iA copy of said
pla% is filed with the papers of =his Board.)
Vote~ Unanimous
14.I.4. ~{EPORTS
Sale pre~ented the Board with a Seport on the developer
wa~er an~ sewer contracts exsuuted by the County Administrator.
90-673 9/12/90
I4.J. REPORTS
~r. Ram~ey presente~ the Soard with a status report on the
General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Reserve
~or Future Capital Projects, District Ro=~ and Street Light
Funds, Lease ?urchases and School Board Agenda.
Mr. Ramsey stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has
formally notified the Ceunty of the acceptance of the following
roads into the State Secondary system:
ADDITIONS I~NGT~
MATOAX HUNDRED - SECTION 1 (Effective
Routs 3930 (Apamatica Lane) - From Route 631 to
0.16 mile South Route 3932 0.25 Mi.
Route 3932 [~lva's Lane) - Prom Route 3930 to
0.18 mile Southeast Route 3930 0.18 Mi.
MINEOLA - SECTION D (Effective
Ro~te 4460 [Stilton Drive) - From Route 3530 to
0.I3 mil~ North Rout~ 4162
Route 4461 [Stilton Court) - From Routs 4460 to
0.06 mile East Route 4460
Route 4462 {Bethesa Drive) - From 0.03 mile
West Route 4460 to 0.03 mile ~ast Route 4460
0.46 Mi.
0.06 Mi.
WENDALL ACRES {Effeotiv= 8/10/90)
Route 4755 (Katie Lane) - From Route 630 to
0.23 ~il~ North Routc 630
0.23 Mi.
DANHURST WOODS - SECTION
Route 3513 [Danhurst Drive) ~ From Route 1003
to Route 3559
Route 355~ {Danwoods Road) ~ From Routs 3~13
to 0.04 mile Rest ROUt~ 3513
Route 3~59 [Danbury Drive) - From. ~.0~ ~ile
West Route 3558 to 0.~5 milo East Route 3558
0,10 Mi.
0.04 Mi.
0.09
EINGSI~NE ACRES - SECTION S (Effe0tive
Route 1663 (Eirethorne Lane) - Fro~ 0.01 mile
South Route ~040 to 0.1~ mile South Route 3040
0,17 Mi.
SQUAREFIELD PARK (Effective 8/8/90)
Route 1663 (Fir,=horns Lane) - F=om 0.15 mile
South Route 3040 to 0.31 mile South Route 3040
0.13
C~4ERON ~ILLS - SECTION C [~ffective 8/t0/90~
Rout~ 45~0 (Royoto Court) - From Route 2300
to 0.2I mile East Routs 2300
0.21 Mi.
WALT~ALL MILL - $~CTION 3 (Effectiv~ 8/10/90)
Route 1091 [Quail Crossing} - From ROU~ 1090
to 0.10 mile West Route 1090
GREGORY'S CHARTER - SECTION A (Effective 8/10/90)
Routs 910 (Lynehe~ter Drive) - From 0.0~ mile
South Route 2086 to 0.t9 mile South Route 2086
O.ll Mi.
90-674 9/12/9Q
m
m
Rouhe 2078 {Briarwick Drive) - From 0.0~ mile
Route 4430 IBonney Lea Court) - Erom Route 910
te 0.10 mile Eazt Route 910
FALLING C~EE FARMS, SECTION H (Effective 7/30/90)
Route 2087 (~u~bleside Drive) - From 0,07 milo
South Route 2086 to 0.10 mile South: ROUTE 2086
WATERC~ST [Effective 8/13/90)
Route 4333 [Waterorest Road)-'z From Ro~te 3600
to 0.09 mile East Routs 4335
Route 4334 [~atercrest Court) - From Routs 4333
to 0.08 mile Eaet Route 4333
WAT~RC~ST (Rffeotivo ~/13190) (continued)
Route 4335 [Waterere~t Place) - From Route 4333
PLEASAnt GROVE (Effeetiv~ 8/13/90}
Route 4340 (~leasan= Grove Lane) - From ROU~e
3600 %o 0.18 mile NOrtheast Route 3600
Route 4341 (Pleasant Gro~e Court) - From Rout~
4540 to 0.04 milo West Route 4340
WOODS - SECTION C (Effective 8/7/90)
Route 4021 {Mason Run Drive) - From Route 4025
to 0+05 mile Northeast Route 4025
WALTHALL MILL -
Route 1092 (D~Ve Path Lane) - From ~ute 1090
0.]8 mile Seuthweet Route 1090
Re~te 4059 (Crosshaven Court) - From Route 1092
to Q.07 mile North Route 1092
WALTEALL CP~EK - SECTION 5 (Effective 8/3/90)
Route 406'4 (Clear Spring~ Lane) - From Route 4062
to 0.28 mile South R0~te 4062
Route 4065 {Clear Springs Fl&eel - FrOm Route 4064
tu ~.06 mile Wmst Route 4064
EAGLE COVE ~ SECTIONS 1, 2 & 9 (Effective B/3/90)
Route 1364 (Oak River Drive) - From 0.23 mile South
Route 802 to 0.17 mile West Route 4784
Route 4788 (Talon PoiDt C~urt) - From Route 1364
O.~l milo South Route 13~4
ROUt~ 4782 (~agl~ Cov~ Court) - From ROUte 1364
to 0.08 mile Son~h Route 4782
Route 4782 (Eaqle Cove Circle) - From Route 478I
=o 0.1~ mile Souuhwest aou~e 4781
90-675
LENG~
(oontinued)
0,10'Mi.
Mi.
0.03 Mi.
0.22 ~i.
0.08 Mi.
0.06 Mi.
0,18 Mi.
8.04 Mi,
0. O~ si.
0.18 Mi.
0.07 Mi.
0.28 Mi.
0.06 Mi.
0.98 Mi.
0,3I Mi.
0.20 ~i.
0~t6 Mi.
9112/90
~AGLE COVE - SDCTION$ 1, 2 & 9 (Bffectivo 8/3/90)
Rout~ 47B3 (Oak River Court) - From Route 1364
~o 0.47 mile Southwest Rou~e 1364
Route 47§4 {~van Road} - Fro~ O.06 mile ~or~h
Route 1354 to ~.33 milo Southwest Route 1364
I~NGT~
(continuod)
0.47 Zi,
0,33 Mi,
on motion of ~r. Apploga~s, socond~ by Mr. Sullivan, the ~oar4
adjourned at 11:20 p.m. {DST) until ~.:~0 p.m. on Sop%ember 19,
1990, at Matcaca High School.
Vote: Unanimous
C. F. Currin~ Jr/
Chairman