Loading...
2010-02-24 Packet~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: ~.~. Subject: Amendment to Board Minutes of October 14, 2009 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Amend the Board Minutes of October 14, 2009 (page 09-582) to correct the road distance as underlined in the noted road section. Summary of Information: The road distance identified for state road acceptance on Dry Creek Road was incorrectly reported as 0.41 miles. This amendment corrects the distance to the actual 0.04 miles. Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 0~0~~1 On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the street meets the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street described below to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Project: Dry Creek Road Adjustment Type Change to the Secondary System of State Addition Reason for Change: VDOT Project Pursuaat to Code of Virginia §33.1-229 Street Name and/or Route • Dry Creek Road, State Route Number 623 Old Route Number: 0 From: 0.85 mile north of Beach Rd., (Rt. 655) To: Cul-de-sac, a distance of: 9:4-~ 0 Q miles. Recordation Reference: ~c Right of Way width (feet) = 50 000 n o ~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ,~, Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 2.A. Subject: County Administrator's Report County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The County Administrator will update the Board on the progress of various projects as requested by the Board of Supervisors. Preparers Marilyn Cole Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Assistant County Administrator ^ No #Q~0003 County Administrator's Top 40's List I. II. Critical Proiects/Activities 1. Airport Entrance Improvements 2. Airport Master Plan 3. Amelia Reservoir Project 4. Animal Shelter Issues 5. Bow Hunting Restrictions 6. Census 2010 7. Community Risk Analysis/Emergency Service Coverage 8. Countywide Comprehensive Plan/Public Facilities Plan 9. Eastern Midlothian Re-development - Chippenham Square - Spring Rock - Stonebridge (formerly Cloverleaf Mall) - Streetscaping 10. Hydrilla Issue 11. Irrigation Policies/Demand Management for Water Use 12. 2010 Legislative Program 13. Low Impact Development Standards 14. Magnolia Green CDA 15. Mass Grading Ordinance 16. Meadowville Interchange 17. Midlothian Turnpike/Courthouse Road Streetscape Improvements (Towne Center) 18. North American Project (at Rt. 288 and Rt. 10) 19. Postal Zip Codes 20. Private Sewer Treatment Facility 21. Sign Ordinance 22. Sports Tourism Plan 23. Streetlight Policy 24. Ukrops Kicker Complex/Poseidon Swimming -Stratton Property 25. Utilities Policies and Managed Growth 26. Watkins Centre 27. Woolridge Road Reservoir Crossing Project 28. Wind Energy Systems OngoinE Proiects/Activities I . Capital Improvement Program 2. Capital Regional Collaborative Focus Group 3. Citizen Budget Advisory Committee 4. Efficiency Studies -Countywide 5. Federal Stimulus Package - Energy Block Grant - Economic Development - Police Department - Recovery Zone Bonds 0~00~4 Page 1 of 4 Updated - 2/18/10 County Administrator's Top 40's List 6. Financial/Budget Issues 7. Fort Lee Expansion 8. In-Focus Implementation -Phase II (Payroll/HR) 9. Joint Meetings of Board of Supervisors/School Board 10. RMA Work Group 11. RRPDC -Large Jurisdiction Committee 12. RRPDC -Transportation Strategies Work Group (work on hold) 13. UASI (Regional) 14. Upper Swift Creek Water Quality Ordinances III. Com pleted Proiects/Activities 1. Board's Appointments Process - 8/2008 2. Business Climate Survey - 2/2009 3. Cash Proffers 4. CBLAB Discussions -12/2009 5. Citizen Satisfaction Survey - S/2009 6. COPS Grants 7. Efficiency Studies -Fire Department and Fleet Management 8. Efficiency Study -Quality/Chesterfield University Consolidation 9. Electronic Signs 10. Board's Emergency Notification Process 11. Employee Health Benefits -Contract Renewal - 8/2009 12. Financial/Budget Issues - Adoption of 2010 Budget - 4/2009 - Adoption of County CIP - 4/2009 - Adoption of School CIP - 5/2009 - Bond Issue/Refinancing - AAA Ratings Retained 13. 457 Deferred Comp Plan (Approved) 14. Hosting of Hopewell Website 15. Impact Fees for Roads - 9/2008 16. In Focus Implementation -Phase I 17. Insurance Service Upgrade (ISO) for Fire Department - 9/2009 18. Leadership Exchange Visits with City of Richmond 19. Legislative Program - 2009 20. Meadowdale Library 21. Minor League Baseball (new team) - 2/2010 22. Multi-Cultural Commission (Quarterly Reports due to Board) -11/2008 23. Planning Fee Structure (General Increases) - 6/2009 24. Planning Fee Structure (Reductions for In-Home Businesses) -1/2009 25. Planning Fees (Holiday for Commercial Projects) - 8/2009 26. Potential Legislation -Impact Fees/Cash Proffers -1/2009 27. Property Maintenance -Proactive Zoning Code Enforcement (countywide) - 2/2009 28. Property Maintenance -Rental Inspection Program 29. Public Safety Pay Plans Implemented (Phase I) ~~®0~~ 30. Redistricting 2011 Calendar/Process Report 31. Regional Workforce Investment Initiative Page 2 of 4 Updated - 2/18/10 County Administrator's Top 40's List 32. Southwest Corridor Water Line 33. Sports Tourism Program with Metropolitan Richmond Sports Backers - 8/2009 34. Ukrops Kicker Complex -soccer fields -Opened 8/2009 35. Upper Swift Creek Plan (Adopted) - 6/2008 36. VDOT Subdivision Street -Acceptance Requirements 37. Walk Through Building Permit Process 38. Website Redesign - 6/2009 39. Wireless Internet Access in County Facilities - 9/2008 ~'a~®~~~ Page 3 of 4 Updated - 2/ 18/ 10 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ,~, Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 5.A. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Corporal Charles E. "Chuck" Morton Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: ~, County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Corporal Charles E. "Chuck" Morton will retire from the Police Department after having provided over 28 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparers Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis Title: Chief of Police Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 0~®0~'7 RECOGNIZING CORPORAL CHARLES E. "CHUCK" MORTON UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Corporal Charles E. "Chuck" Morton will retire from the Chesterfield County Police Department on March 1, 2010, after providing over 28 years of quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Corporal Morton has faithfully served the county in the capacity of patrol officer and senior, master, career and corporal police officer; and WHEREAS, during his tenure with the Chesterfield County Police Department, Corporal Morton served diligently in the Uniform Operations Bureau as a Field Training Officer, Warrant Service Officer and Funeral Escort Officer; and WHEREAS, Corporal Morton has received numerous letters of commendation, thanks and appreciation for service rendered to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Corporal Morton has provided the Chesterfield County Police Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss Corporal Morton's diligent service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 24th day of February 2010, publicly recognizes Corporal Charles E. "Chuck" Morton, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Corporal Morton, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. o~®®~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY __ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 ~, AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 7.A. Subiect: Deferred Item to Consider an Ordinance to Amend Section 14-10 of the County Code Relating to Shooting Arrows from Bows Near Buildings County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to consider an ordinance to amend section 14-10 of the County Code relating to shooting arrows from bows near buildings. Summary of Information: Current law allows property owners and anyone with their permission to use bows to hunt on their property during hunting season so long as the arrow would not cross the property line. In addition, due to the growth in the deer population in the county, the state department of Game and Inland Fisheries authorizes additional bow hunting through the use of site specific "kill permits". These Game and Inland Fisheries authorizations can authorize bow hunting on property which is adjacent to or within residential neighborhoods. Bow hunting in areas in the county which are heavily populated may pose an increased risk of personal injury. To address the concerns of county citizens from the Salisbury area, an ordinance was proposed which prohibited shooting arrows within 600' of residences. The Board held a public hearing in November where a number of Preparers Steven L. Micas Title: County Attorney 2723:83226.1(79894.2) Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # t~J004~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA citizens spoke about issues such as safety concerns, the increasing deer population, the need to allow target practice, the high number of deer- vehicle accidents, and the lack of accidents or injuries from bow hunting. The public hearing was closed and action deferred to this meeting. Currently,. Henrico County prohibits shooting arrows on properties in residential, commercial or industrial districts. Hanover County has no restrictions. Both the Cities of Richmond and Colonial Heights allow bow hunting on private property through a special urban archery program which is only applicable to cities and towns. In response to the issues raised at the public hearing, the proposed ordinance has been modified to 1) allow target shooting, 2) to reduce the prohibited distance for shooting areas in the proximity of a dwelling from 600' to 150', and 3) to allow shooting even within 150' of a dwelling with permission from the owner or occupant. The proposed ordinance still includes a required state law exemption which allows bow hunting in an otherwise prohibited area, but only for "kill permits" specifically authorized by the state department of Game and Inland Fisheries to thin the deer population and then only on properties zoned agricultural that are two acres or greater. ©~~~~'~ 2723:83226.1(79894.3 ) AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 14-10 RELATING TO DISCHARGING FIREARMS OR SHOOTING ARROWS FROM BOWS NEAR BUILDINGS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 14-10 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 14-10. Same--Discharging firearms or shooting arrows from bows. (a) No person shall discharge any firearm within the county within 600 feet of a (i) dwelling of another; (ii) business establishment; (iii) public building; (iv) public gathering; or (v) public meeting place. pro +t~~„ Q ~ nnn nn (eb) As to firearms. Tthis section shall not apply to a (i) law-enforcement officer in the performance of his official duties; (ii) any person whose discharge of a firearm is justifiable or excusable at law in the protection of life or property; (iii) the discharge, on land of at least five acres that is zoned for agricultural use, of a firearm for the killing of deer pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 29.1-529; (iv) the discharge of a firearm that is otherwise specifically authorized by law; (v) the discharge of black powder firearms using blanks as part of historical re-enactments, historical living history programs and historical demonstrations; (vi) the discharge of starter blank weapons to initiate athletic competitions; or (vii) ceremonial and patriotic displays. ~ Except for target shooting no person shall shoot an arrow from any bow within the county within 150 feet of a (i) business establishment• (ii) public building;~iii) ublic gathering; (iv) public meeting_place• or v) dwelling of another except that the 150 foot limitation shall not apply if the dwelling owner or occupant has iven ermission As to shooting arrows from bows this section shall not apply to shooting an arrow from a bow for the killing of deer pursuant to Code of Vir inia § 29 1-529 on land of at least two acres that is zoned for agricultural use ~ For purposes of this section, "bow" includes all compound bows crossbows lop bows and recurve bows having a peak draw weight of 10 pounds or more The term "bow" does not include bows that have a eak draw of less than 10 ounds or that are desi ned or intended to be used principally as toys The term "arrow" means ashaft-like.~rojectile intended to be shot from a bow. f~..~ Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.00. 000011 2723(00):79894.2 State law references-Similar provision Code of Vir ig nia § 15 2-1209 authority of county to prohibit outdoor shooting of firearms or arrows from bows in certain areas (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. Q~®®:~~ 2723(00):79894.2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.A. Subject: Page 1 of 5 Advertisement of Tax Rates for Tax Year 2010 and Advertisement of the Proposed FY2011 and FY2012 Budget, Capital Improvement Program, Community Development Block Grant Program, and Other Ordinance Changes omme County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize Advertisement of 2010 Calendar Year Tax Rates, the Proposed FY2011 and 2012 Budget, Proposed FY2011-FY2015 Capital Improvement Program, the Proposed FY2011 Community Development Block Grant Program, and Other Ordinance Changes for public hearings on March 24, 2010 for these items as outlined below. Summary of Information: The Board established March 24, 2010 for public hearings on proposed tax rates, the Proposed FY2011 Budget, the Proposed FY2011-FY2015 Capital Improvement Program and the Proposed FY2011 Community Development Block Grant Program. Advertising requirements differ depending on the item. This item requests authorization to advertise the necessary public hearings in accordance with the state code. 1. Proposed Tax Rates: Tax rate assumptions used in formulating the FY2011 base line revenue projections that were presented at the revenue work session are listed below. Those are the same tax rates that were adopted for the 2009 tax year, noting the 2009 real estate tax rate of $0.95 per $100 in assessed value. Reassessed residential and commercial properties declined 4.8 percent and 6.4 percent respectively during 2009. The real estate tax rate to offset all of the decrease in revenues from reassessed properties is $1.00 per $100 in assessed value. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget & Management Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # 000013 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Summary of Information (continued) Page 2 of 5 The Board must advertise a rate for each tax classification for the 2010 tax year. Advertisement of a specific rate leaves the Board the flexibility to adopt any rate up to, but not higher than the advertised rate. Given the uncertainty in state revenue reductions, which continue to fluctuate as evidenced by the governor's February 17 announced budget proposals, the proposed tax rates to advertise, with the exception of real estate as noted, remain the same as last year and are shown below. A recommendation on the noted exceptions will be made at the meeting, thus allowing staff time to review and report on the House and Senate budget proposals expected to be released February 21. Real Estate (January, 2010) TBD Tangible Personal Property (excluding automobiles and trucks) and Real Estate for Public Service Corporations same as real estate Personal Property $3.60 Personal Property (automobiles and trucks) of Public Service Corporations $3.60 Personal Property Tax for members of Volunteer $0.96 Rescue Squads, Volunteer Fire Departments, Volunteer Police Chaplains, and Auxiliary Police Personal Property Tax for Wild and Exotic Animals $0.01 Personal Property Tax for Motor Vehicles that use $3.24 "Clean and Special Fuels" Machinery and Tools $1.00 Personal Property Tax for Motor Vehicles, Trailers, $0.96 And Semi-Trailers with a gross weight of 10,000 Pounds or more Airplanes $0.50 Personal Property Tax for Specially Equipped Motor Vehicles $0.01 The Code of Virginia requires that public hearings on the budget and on tax rates be held at different times, but can be on the same day. Therefore, public hearings are planned to be advertised for March 24, 2010 as follows: Proposed Tax Rates: 6:45 p.m. Proposed FY2011 Community Development Block Grant Program: 7:00 p.m. ~~ 0 ~1~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 5 ~~, Summary of Information (continued) Proposed FY2011-FY2015 Capital Improvement Program: 7:15 p.m. Proposed FY2011 Financial Plan: 7:30 p.m. Other ordinance changes that are being considered as part of the County Administrator's FY2011 Proposed Budget include: 1) service fees relating to emergency ambulance transports in the Fire Department's Revenue Recovery Program; 2) the process for the issuance of, and calculation of interest for, business licenses subject to payment of delinquent taxes as well as the addition of a new business category; and 3) fees charged for the Utilities Department operations. These ordinance changes will be advertised for 6:30 p.m. 2. Emergency Ambulance Transport Fees. This fee was established to recover costs typically reimbursed by Medicare and commercial insurance companies for the cost of emergency transport services and to enhance emergency medical services. The fees generated from the revenue recovery program only partially offset the cost of providing emergency medical transport/rescue services in Chesterfield County. Over time, the allowable Medicare and commercial insurance company reimbursement rates for emergency medical care and transportation have been adjusted and are now higher than Chesterfield's current charges. The requested changes in the emergency ambulance transport fee schedule would allow the county to recover costs in accordance with allowable insurance and Medicare rates. The revenue recovery fee schedule was last adjusted in April of 2008, the only time since inception of the program in July of 2002. This increase has been recommended by the Internal Audit Department and is supported by the Fire and EMS Department. The estimated revenue to be generated from the fee increase is $175,000 for FY2011. 3. Business Licenses. The proposed code revision for issuance of a business license would allow the county to collect all delinquent taxes prior to issuance of a business license. This change is proposed due to the pending implementation of a new, fully-integrated tax assessment, billing and collection system that will allow tremendous customer service efficiencies, as well as the ability to fully automate collection activity across tax types that previously have been manually administered. The City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, Goochland County, Spotsylvania County, City of Fairfax, Accomack County, the Town of Ashland, City of Winchester, Portsmouth, and the City of Norton all currently have this procedure in place. Additionally, the ordinance proposes a technical change to allow for the assessment of the interest penalties on delinquent taxes to be automatically calculated at the beginning of the next month after they were due. The requested change will allow the county to convert from a manual to an automated process for the assessment of penalties. ~~00'l5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 4 of 5 ,,, Summary of Information (continued) The ordinance also proposes a new category for business licenses, adding a "Limited Mixed Beverage Retailer" category for businesses meeting this Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control classification. All of the requested changes to the business license code sections are not anticipated to generate any additional revenue in FY2011 or beyond. 4. Utilities Department Fees. The Utilities Department's analysis of the FY2011 budget, capital replacement projects, and projections over the next ten years indicate that current revenues, without fee increases, will not be sufficient to cover operating expenses. As an enterprise fund fully supported by payments from users, fee increases are necessary to offset costs of capital projects to comply with the nutrient regulations for the Chesapeake Bay, pump station rehabilitation, new and replacement water tanks, new and replacement water lines, the county's contractual share of Richmond water plant projects, as well as maintaining the integrity of the county's water and wastewater facilities. While the FY2011 budget is proposed to be 14 percent below the FY2010 adopted budget, additional revenues are required to meet the projected longer term costs. A comparison of the FY2010 and proposed FY2011 budgets indicates that personnel costs would be reduced 3.4 percent, operating costs reduced 8 percent, capital would be reduced 1.6 percent and debt would be reduced 38.9 percent due to the retirement of bonds in FY2010. A slight revenue decrease is also anticipated for FY2011. 5.a. Utility User Fees. The proposed charges for a typical 5/8" residential size meter having an 18 CCF combined water and wastewater bi-monthly bill will increase by approximately $2.58 ($1.29 monthly). The increase is comprised of changes in both the commodity and base charges. The wastewater commodity charge is proposed to increase by $0.05 per one hundred cubic feet (CCF) and is anticipated to generate an additional $595,000 in revenues. The water and wastewater bi-monthly base charges for a typical 5/8" residential size meter is proposed to increase by $1.68 and is anticipated to generate an additional $1,168,000. These increases are needed to cover the projected cost of rendering water and wastewater utility services and funding capital replacement projects and will increase a typical bi-monthly bill to $90.60. The base charges for larger meters increases proportionately based on meter size. 5.b. Utility Water and Sewer Connection Fees. In addition, the department's analysis of costs for expansion projects and projections over the next ten years reflect the need for a connection fee adjustment to cover capital costs. The connection fees for a 5/8" residential size meter are proposed to increase in water from $4,025 to $4,400 (generating an additional $680,000) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS _ Page 5 of 5 IAf Summary of Information (continued) and in wastewater from $3,140 to $3,455 (generating an additional $439,600). The connection fees for larger meters will increase proportionately based on meter size. Even after the proposed rate increases (assuming a typical bill for combined services), the County's rates will still be significantly less than surrounding jurisdictions. In addition, the industrial strong waste surcharge for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) is proposed to increase to cover the department's cost of treating this waste. This charge is increasing from $0.13 per pound to $0.21 per pound (generating additional estimated revenue of $8,680). 6. Other Fees. Staff proposes an increase in the fee for street sign paddles to cover the cost of producing developer and citizen requested street signs from $75 to $100. This requested change does not require a code change, and therefore, will not require a public hearing. The requested change in the fee is estimated to generate approximately $1,500 in additional revenue in FY2011. ©~~®~~ ^ ^ ^ O ~_ ^ _ .~ i O~ ~ y v o ~. o ~ ~ O ~ H ~ ~ `~ c ~ V ~ ~ a~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ m V ~ ~ O O 1~ M O~ C~ ~ ~ .. .. C7 O O r O O N N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ^ ^ ~ ^ 0^ O O !~ .~ ~ .~ _ ~ _ ~ a ~ N ,_ ^~ i ~ O 0 y ~ ~ °o ~ O ~ ,~ N ~, o ~' c o ~ U i~^ ''~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ o L ~ ~ c v ~ > ~ ~ ~ v .. W ~ L i !' S~. ~ ~ ~ °' a ~' ~ U .U ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L N N ~ Q 0 0 O ~ ~ ~ U O t~ U N M L O ~ VJ T~ y ~ _ -~ ~, C6 ~ (a ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ O v~ ~ V O ~ t0 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ C6 -O ~ O ^ O ~ ~ ~ }' ._ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~i ~ ~' _ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ca t~ o ~ Cn ~ cn ~ cv !~. o `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !" ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ .O ~ O ~ (~ U ~ v ca ~ ~ ° ~ °~ °~ ~ U ~ ~ cn M ~ N ,c ~ ~ ~ a~ O :~ ~ i O ~ °o . ~ ~ •A `~ 0 V ~~ a ~ _ V 3 ~+ .~ 0 a. w~ W ~\ O M a~ LL U 0 L ~--~ O .- O W M y / f~ ~i //+/~~ VJ 5~\ 'L^ V / N a~ +-+ O i ~® ~W r / M 0 a~ I. --~ ri / s ~... O •+ ~ ~ i. N~ V I.L. N i _ ~ o ~ _ !VA W ~ /I di / r ... a L Q O '~ V/ ^ ^ ^ O ^~ a+ W V) O V y O ~ O ~ O V 3 O Q V ,U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ N G ~~ o ~ ~ ~ X~~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~_ .V ~ O N N ~ U ~ j ~ N O O c~ .~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ O Q , ~ ~ -~, a--r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O }, ~ ~ c1. ~ ~ N `i O ~ ~ ~ O ~ •~ ~ •- ~ O ~ , a~ , ~ U_ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~' ~ ~ U ~ ~ , O :~ O L U ~ j ~ (6 ~ N L N --~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N v ~ ~ ~ ~ U (6 w N N i Q O L O -~, O ~_ N co U cat N N O 0 .~ ~, U N O O C ~ ~ ~ . o ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ U ~, 6g. .~ c~ O ~ O ~ ~ O • ~ ~ O O O N O U ~ ~ ~ ~ O .~ ~ O '~ ~ O O ~ N ~, O ~ c~ ~ ~ x cq O ~ ~ U O ~ ~.~ .~ ~ ~ O N U ~ O O O N O ~ ~ U U ~ ~ ~ G _N C ~.. N C~. O* ~: Q~ ~; ~' -~... ~:. N N N O CO N O ^ ^ ^ ^~ 0 ~ (~ y V i~ 3 O Q V N O O U c ~ .c ~ ~ .a? ,~ c~ ~~ c~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ , c~ O :~, ~ ~ N ~ r" cg O ~ ~ cB ~ ~ ~ tB O U O >C N N ~ ~ .~ I ._ ~ co ~~ ~ O ~ U ~ ~ O ~ •~ ~ ~ a- O ~ ;~, O v ~ ~ ~~ .~ ~ o ,o ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ o ~ O U ~ ca O ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~ ~ ~ U ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~~ ~ ,~ ~ O ~ ~ ~+-~ N U j, ~_ ~ ~ ~ O C O ~ N U ~ ~ N Q ~ N ^ ^ ^ O ~~ O N 0 ~~ H~ W~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~} N r ~ O O ~ N ~} O r E~4 ti O O N O N O p ~ O N Ef} 0 r ~3 ti O r d~ c T bF. 00 O r d~ L 0 X N ~ H M O N 0 0 N r O N 0 0 {~} o N O ~ d! r ~ ~ r ^ ^ ^ y O H ~~ ~+ 'a 3 m ,~ s c ~ o ~ O . ~ .~ ~ a °' ~ m s ~ U to ~ ~ ~ N ~ .~ _ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o L ~, ~ ~ ~, N ., ~ m ~ c~ Q~ ~ /~/~ W ~ L 0 .~ ~ C s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ a~ ~ Q o ~ a. o Q U ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ L L ~ Q O •~ / A ~ L' Q CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 -- AGENDA 1749 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.6.1. Subject: Nomination/Appointment to the Policy Board of the John Tyler Alcohol Safety Action Program County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Appointment of Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis to the John Tyler ASAP Policy Board for a term of three years, effective immediately through February 23, 2013. Summary of Information: The John Tyler Alcohol Safety Action Program (ASAP) was originally called the "Capital Area" ASAP program by resolution adopted in 1979, and is now known as the "John Tyler ASAP" program by a resolution adopted February 10, 2010. The program is governed by a Policy Board wherein each city and county governing body appoints one member to serve as a representative to the John Tyler ASAP Policy Board for a term of three years. Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis has been an active John Tyler ASAP Policy Board member and would be willing to continue in that capacity and represent Chesterfield County should the Board of Supervisors choose to appoint him. Preparers James J.L. Stegmaier Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No Title: County Administrator oa0ot8 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (continued) Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to board and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.2. Subject: Nomination/Appointment to the Towing Advisory Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Nominate/Appoint member to serve on the Towing Advisory Board Summary of Information: The members of the Towing Advisory Board serve at the pleasure of the Board and have no set term limits. In accordance with the Code of Virginia §46.2- 1217 adopted as County Ordinance, 1997, the Towing Advisory Board shall include representatives of local law enforcement, towing and recovery operators, and the general public. Colonel Dupuis has recommended that the Board nominate and appoint Sergeant David J. Higgins to replace Lieutenant Brad Badgerow on the Towing Advisory Board. Sgt. Higgins meets all eligibility requirements to fill the vacancy and has indicated his willingness to serve. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated. Preparers _ Thierry G. Dupuis Title: Chief of Police Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 00000 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ~. Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 -Item Number: B.C. Subject: Streetlight Upgrade Cost Approvals County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested: This item requests Board approval of streetlight upgrades in the Bermuda District. Summary of Information: Requests for streetlights, from individual citizens or civic groups, are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections; CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # Q~®0~1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) 2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; 3. Petitions are required and should include 750 of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. Cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requestor of the denial. Projects cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial. BERMUDA DISTRICT: In the Trueheart Heights subdivision, upgrade existing 7000 Lumen Mercury Vapor fixtures to the County residential standard 8000 Lumen Sodium Vapor fixtures: • Old Centralia Road, vicinity of 11360 Cost to upgrade streetlight: $149.00 (Design Cost: $300.00) Meets all criteria • Rochelle Road, vicinity of 11400 Cost to upgrade streetlight: $149.00 (Design Cost: $300.00) Meets all criteria • Rochelle Road, vicinity of 11520 Cost to upgrade streetlight: $149.00 (Design Cost: $300.00) Meets all criteria For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. 0~00~2 STREETLIGHT UPGRADE REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: November 20, 2009 Estimate Received: February 2, 2010 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Ms. Julia D Miller ADDRESS: 3640 Hemlock Road Chester, VA 23831 REQUESTED LOCATIONS: Old Centralia Road, vicinity of 11360 Cost to upgrade streetlight: $149.00 Rochelle Road, vicinity of 11400 Cost to upgrade streetlight: $149.00 Rochelle Road, vicinity of 11520 Cost to upgrade streetlight: $149.00 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles Per Day Petition: Requestor Comments: None Qualified, existing lights Qualified, existing lights Qualified, existing lights Estimate Requested: November 21, 2009 Days Estimate Outstanding: 74 O~D00~3 Streetlight Request Map February 24, 2010 This map is a copyrighted product of the Chestertield County GIS Office. Streetlight Legend 0 ,~, ', existing light requested upgrade N This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chestertield County Environmental Engineering Department. 440 220 0 440 Feet cjs 000024 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.1. Subject: Acceptance of Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Award from the Department of Homeland Security County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Department of Fire and Emergency Medical Services to accept and appropriate the SAFER grant award from the Department of Homeland Security in the amount of $184,560 and authorize the County Administrator to execute all documents. Summary of Information: The Department of Fire and Emergency Medical Services will utilize the funding from the grant award to develop and deliver a Volunteer Recruitment and Retention Program. This is a four-year project. There are no matching requirements for this grant award. Preparers Chief Edward L. Senter. Jr. Attachments: ~ Yes Title: Fire Chief ^ No # ~ 0000,5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Budget and Management Comments: Page 2 of 2 This item requests that the Board accept and appropriate funds for a Department of Homeland Security SAFER Grant in the amount of $184,560. The funding will be used to develop a coordinated volunteer recruitment and retention program. The Chesterfield Fire and EMS department plans to use these funds to develop a recruitment website, purchase billboard space, train staff to solicit volunteers and purchase recruitment materials. The grant allows for the funding of $184,560 to be used over four years with quarterly reimbursements to the county. There is no local match required or ongoing operational impacts. Preparers Allan Carmody Title: Director. Budget and Management 00006 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA »., Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.2. Subject: Adoption of Resolution Approving the Financing and the Issuance of Bonds by the Economic Development Authority of Chesterfield County, Virginia for the Benefit of SportsQuest, LLC County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution approving the financing of the SportsQuest Project and the issuance of the bonds by the Economic Development Authority to assist in the financing of the project. Summary of Information: On December 2, 2009, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Resolution declaring the County a Recovery Zone for purposes of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (also known as the Stimulus Act) and approving projects to be financed with recovery zone economic development bonds and recovery zone facility bonds. In this resolution, the Board designated bonds to be issued to finance the costs of the proposed SportsQuest complex at Powhite Parkway and Route 288. The proceeds of the bonds will be used to assist SportsQuest in financing the acquisition, construction and equipping of a multi-sports complex on an approximately 250-acre tract of land. The project will include a sports medicine center, a sports field house, an aquatics center, an ice- plex seating approximately 2,500 people, a fitness center, an entertainment center, corporate offices and retail space all totaling approximately 350,000 square feet. Preparers E. Wilson Davis Title: Director of Economic Development Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No ~oooa~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) The Economic Development Authority of Chesterfield County (the "EDA") has since moved forward with the process to issue recovery zone facility bonds for SportsQuest. The EDA held public hearings on the bonds, as required by the Internal Revenue Code, on January 7 and February 18, 2010 and passed resolutions signifying the EDA's intent to issue recovery zone facility bonds on behalf of SportsQuest in an amount not to exceed $30,000,000. Under state and federal law, after the public hearing is held by the EDA, the Board of Supervisors must approve the financing of the SportsQuest project and the issuance of the bonds by the authority. Such approval does not constitute a debt of the county; the bonds will be only a limited obligation of the EDA, payable from revenues received by the EDA from SportsQuest. Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution. ~~®~~~ WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "Authority") has considered the Application for Bond Authorization of SportsQuest, LLC (the "Company"), whose principal place of business is 2419 Colony Crossing Place, Midlothian, Virginia 23112; and WHEREAS, the Company has requested that the Authority issue its recovery zone facility revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $30,000,000 (the "Bonds") pursuant to the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Title 15.2, Chapter 49 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act") the proceeds from which Bonds will be used to assist the Company in financing the acquisition, construction and equipping, on a tract of land of approximately 250 acres situated near the intersection of the Powhite Parkway and Route 288 in Chesterfield County, Virginia (the "County"), of multi-sports complex facilities generally described as (i) medical facilities that include a sports medicine clinic, therapy/rehabilitation and sports science center, a sports field house, an aquatics center, anice-plex seating approximately 2,500 people, a fitness center, an entertainment center, corporate offices and retail space all totaling approximately 350,000 square feet and (ii) parking facilities consisting of approximately 500,000 square feet ofparking lots (the "Project") with the initial operator, owner and manager of the Project being the Company; and WHEREAS, the Company has described the benefits of the Project to the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County") and the Authority has, after public hearing, by adoption of its resolution (the "Approval Resolution"), recommended to the Board of Supervisors of the County (the "Board of Supervisors") its approval of the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority under the Act in the amount requested to finance costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Project to be financed through the issuance of the Bonds is located in the County and the Board of Supervisors constitutes the highest elected governmental unit of the County; and WHEREAS, copies of the Authority's Approval Resolution, brief summary of the Authority's public hearing and Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed with the Board of Supervisors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby approves the financing of the Project and the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Act, to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4906 of the Act, does not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds or the creditworthiness of the Company or otherwise indicate that the Project possesses any economic viability. As required by the Act, the issuance of the Bonds as requested by the Company will not ~~®Q~~ constitute a debt or pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia or the County. Neither the Commonwealth of Virginia nor any political subdivision thereof, including the Authority or the County shall be obligated to pay the Bonds, or the interest thereon, or other costs incident thereto, except from the revenues and monies pledged therefore, and neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth of Virginia nor any political subdivision thereof, including the Authority and the County, will be pledged to payment of principal of such Bonds or the interest thereon or other costs incidental thereto. 3. The County Administrator and other County employees and representatives are authorized to take such action and file such documents as are consistent with the provisions of this resolution. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ADOPTED this day of , 2010. 0~®t1~3~ ,~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.3. Subject: Award of Contract for Maintenance and Repairs at the Manchester, Enon, Clover Hill, Buford and Phillips Fire and Emergency Medical Services Stations County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board is requested to award a contract to C.D. Hall Construction, Inc. in the amount of $421,750.00 for maintenance and repairs at the Manchester, Enon, Clover Hill, Buford, and Phillips Fire and EMS stations. Summary of Information: The Manchester, Enon, Clover Hill, Buford and Phillips fire stations have been identified as facilities where the apparatus ramps, sidewalks, parking lots and driveways have deteriorated over time. This deterioration has led to potholes and standing water, which presents an increased risk of damage to fire apparatus and other vehicles using these paved surfaces. The contractor will replace all or portions of the front and rear ramps at four (4) locations; namely, the Manchester, Enon, Clover Hill and Phillips fire stations. In addition, paving for the driving and parking areas will be replaced at all five (5) fire stations, to include Buford. A total of 21 bids were received and the selected contractor is the lowest, responsive and responsible bidder for the listed fire stations. Preparers Edward L. Senter. Jr. Title: Chief, Chesterfield Fire and EMS Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # 00031 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Budget and Management Comments• This item requests that the Board award a paving contract for the Manchester, Enon, Clover Hill, Buford, and Phillips Fire and EMS stations to C.D. Hall Construction, Inc. in the amount of $421,750.00. The bid was below the department's estimated cost for these projects. The FY2010 adopted Capital Improvement Program included $500,000 for fire station repairs. The project appropriation is sufficient for the award of the construction contract. Preparers _ Allan M. Carmody p~OO32 Title: Director, Budget and Management CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.4.a. Subject: Conveyance of an Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company for a 15' underground easement to provide service to five mobile classrooms at Robious Middle School, 2701 Robious Crossing Drive. Summary of Information: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company for a 15' underground easement to provide service to five mobile classrooms at Robious Middle School, 2701 Robious Crossing Drive. This request has been reviewed by school administration, county staff and Comcast Cablevision. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 000033 VICINITY SKETCH Conveyance of an Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company C] ~ ~ p,N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GD ~ C~ o~ L C~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ `cotvv~ANCE of ~I O AN EASEMENT.. ~y -~ 70 j T~ ~ Pa ~ K Y % ~ 0 L ~ L ~ 4 N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w .E s 1 hCI - U6.67 let 0~~®e34 c m z u m C m j ~i > J ~ o ~ OW N ~ C ~3 a~! o° ~ "- 3 g ~3 ~ _O_01 p O o 0. r a,~ ~ ~ a U gy t 3 Q ZQw ~ O ~r ~ H Q_ E = II~ = _ ~ G 0 • ~ ';' J~l ~ O lh ~ y ~ _ I I ~~ ~ ~ I o ~ ~~ ~ ~\ \\ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ 1 I~ ~~ ~~ // o~ , ~ia~ y / % ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~y~'s~ ~~ ~s~~ ~~'~ ~o . <<~ s~o,~°d~ r 3 0 ~, a~ _ O '~ t M C ;> v° P ~ r c o' m ~, g 2 o o 7s ~ ~ n eo ~o ~~ ROBIOUS CROSSING W DRIVE ~ ~ 9 c W m a ~~®~3~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.4.b. Subiect: Conveyance of an Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company for a variable width easement for the realignment of overhead power lines and power poles at Clover Hill High School, 13900 Hull Street Road. Summary of Information: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company for a variable width easement for realignment of overhead power lines and power poles at Clover Hill High School, 13900 Hull Street Road in conjunction with the Route 360 road widening project. This request has been reviewed by school administration. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Real Property Manager ^ No # ~~ 0000 VICINITY SKETCH Conveyance of an Easement to Virginia Electric and Pawer Company 'o Ccxtveysnce ~f An Easement i SO THSH ~` POI TE D N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W '- -E S 1 Irol - 37 5 Re t c m m a a > ~~ L C O ~ a J M v N f ~ ~ ~ WE N °~ J ~~ c o~ ~ 0 2 ~_ 0 3 zC ~ W~ 2 O ~ V' ~ U G~ O O ~ ~' 3 3~ 0 $ as 0- a~b 40. ~~ ~ E P J Z ¢. = ~ 2 E O n F - W Q = 0~ H ~ ~ ~ Ft =~ J .Y Ur W U N • I~T+ C J o d J Cp O O O a_ ~ O i V ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ N O bO~ 1 JN O _ tt7 07p O I BOO` ~ I 1 ^ S~^ ~ ~ o I No ~ 1 min m 1 `N M On ~ t N .~. ! I g U N N j U O ~ ~ 1 « f0 1 ~ ~ O ~ U p o ° otDrn 1 M 3 J O~ Una j I O y0.+ I v 1 1 + t ;° ~ 'ac0 ~ •' 1 1 .~ W :: ~ N 1 T o 1 I ~ rY ~ c I - W N W 1 I M tO ~1 I ~ Y M I ~ I L ~ ~n~ 1 3 -.~ `o r o I anud I~~!4~ r 3 I i ~ ~ a ~ i I `o r LL ~ Jf- ~ z ~ ~ s 00000-if6Z-1L9-9ZL \ ~° - ~ ~ O O p y n a N ' O . . ~ o O ~ In UO$ N y 0 E ~ a o ~ ~ ~ooo! ~~ °`' 3 g~ a~m ~ c~~ Ohm NNUI I- ~n2 c I I I N_ _ W fD~ ee,~ I I ^_ mtO~ ~N~ o~~ 3 I I 0~0 N rn U^~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.5.a. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along West Hundred Road from Irene W. Carnes County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested:' Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.001 acres along West Hundred Road from Irene W. Carnes and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. DIStrICt: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~0®39 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along West Huadred Road from Irene W. Carnes s~ fifi ~' a~ Ill ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~p~ '~ ~ ~~ ~~ s ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ 4 ~~ ~2 ~~ i ~ KS FQREST CIR QO©1 Acrebedicetion ~~ KS FOREST CT SQUARE AVE ~ ,~ y a ~ q ~ EST ~tig 4~~Q ~ ~ \ EST IR J v v Q- ~ ~' ^( ~ \ ~ i go ~ SUN ~ ~ p ~ s ~ s ~ wao~s ~ Q t~ G ~r .p o ~ GtIRTIS p y o ~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities , W - -E S 1 I~cl - (166.67 4e t ~~~ O ~~ rn ... ».. of O F8 Obi/ E w ~ ~ ~ E N y.c ~'C a~i'~ ~ o. V N 2 ~ Wo ~o °~' W~ ~~ w ~' w `P o v_ N W ,,, N o 4..~ N o (p GCS A t-i ~ ~ .C O~ ~ OQO O U Oo0 ,CO~+ o°o- oov ~~°'a~a o-°~'a~ oY A ~~ o d1 w U Q1^ U d p~ O `~ ~ ~ N ~ V O o I Lj~ I Cj~Y I Up~j I v 4` ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y~m Q,-c..°^' ~~O1moo c~w°' o° W Vj~W ..W ~~: _ A~I+~r'fN 3Y 3y 3~ c ~~F1 ~ °o~~ N CEO COON CEO G~ W VINO °'o Ebm E~mo ~~m m~ ~ O~~ p Y o0 .~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ awN~ ~ ~~° X o ~~a~ ~,~°,a~v ~~a~ ~~ O OH o.~o cl- o~,a~ o~,oc o~,a~ o~, W A V<~o+~ =XW ~O W ~O o W ~O W -. WH ~.c~~ 3 ~ ~ p im pN ~ ~A`'ZmC~ ~O~ ~ .u/ k ~ T1•~A 1-Nt^ N Op ~ ~ Q~ O ~ W ~i ~ d'•VN °4~O ~' ~ JOO ~c'~ x~AOE-+ W ~o 3N I °' ~~p~~.~r C y1,,~ 3 ~ A ~ ~ a a a'~~ Z~ \CL Z k~'~1 \~N n O~~O ~1- xQ p `t ~~ ' i ~I O u ».. ..- c i ~ .' ~ ~ 2 ~' ~ ~ ~ a~i , ~ ~ ~' (het O ~ Q W ice/ .'~ i~ \ ~ ~ ~5' ~ ~ VUi ~ i ~~'~ Q~ map ~ ~ ~ \ `~ ~~, ~,~„r- o'~ ~ ~ 0 0 J~ `~.~ y .r O o ~ t. m x a° o Z o. o. ~ v~ p' ~~' ~ ~ c Op ' W W yip ~o \~ i r ~ o~. C'~~b ~ V-~ ~ ~~ ~ 3 V^ ~F~opb p~ \Z • 7 ~G y~ C =NM ~ ~ ~. ~- o>cL v M O ~ ~~ ~~~ °V \ ~~ v m I b a~^o0 p ~gtp3 p ~`~O~ t3n ~'Op~ p3m~ y \ ` ~j~ N H 2N.. ~ ma~v c'i~n.^t ~ ~ ~1.'' u~ O 3NO° v'~ ~~h ~rn~z, 200 °~ \ ~oN o ov,°o~o~M ao°~o3 .a~rn ~ oo-O,~ opavo~ p~ ~~ ~f o~jmco 6 r~ C+~ oNN2 ~~ ~ aoi~`i' o rn ~ 5~ s ~ ~ 0~3 V D ~ o ~~ ~~~ ~ cm^~~~ ~~j 2~ ~ O ~~~~~ ~Q Q ~\ ) o ~ O~DOi )41 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.5.b. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along West Hundred Road from McLaughlin Holdings, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Accept the conveyance of two parcels of land containing a total of 0.024 acres along West Hundred Road from McLaughlin Holdings, LLC and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of these parcels conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # 000042 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land along West Hundred Road from McLaughlin Holdings LLC ~~ i~ FF ~ ~~ 9~ ~ d ~ ~ ~~~ 'Q ~ ~~ ~~- ~, ° 3 ~ . F~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~~ ~ ~~ ~ y ~~ ~~ KS FDREST CIR KS FDREST CT p SQUARE AVE '~ Q4~3 end O.t~1 Acra D~dicatlvns a ~ ~ ~ EST ~~R P~~~ 2 ~ \ EST IR v ~~" ~ ~~ ~ ~4 ,~ NUN ~ ~ 9 ~ S ~ y~p04S b 5 ~ 2 ~N ~ ~ .~ 0 a GURTIS 9 ~,y o ~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities , W - E S I hcl - 866.6i' ke t 000043 rn =- "-' "' ~ oo ~ o f g 0 ~ ~ aci ~ N o0 ~ ~ yc ~acic a°~ic hp~ ~ N 2 v i- v ~- i- ~~ ,c o~ ~ o~ v+ U o~ ,crn ~ A~ ~ ~ 0 vv' +%cvi~ ocviv' ° Q 3 s, N.~~ 3:Ca°p ~~4 N~ O G O V o a ~ ~ a: ~ y~~ 3Y $ 3.xm x 3Y •C V~E1 ~ ON 1 ++ O ++ O 'O +-~ O +-+ 11 ~ O M') eF N CEO c~ON c~0 c~ W~C.7t~N0 °o E~m Eamo ~~m ~~ wE p Y o00 o h ° ~ v°i ° ~v ai ° ~ v°i ° wQ ~~ H v.E o v v U U W ~~ ~ O~I.i ~ ,-o W ~~ W ~O v W ~O W ~ ~ ~ •c> ~~x ~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~ c a~ aoooo "~ ~ ~° ~~'A Zmoo O~ ~~~ ~ ~ E ~~ ~ N ~ ~A N (n 00 to •~ ~ ~ w ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ oo ~ ~~~ o ~~ x~A W 3 ~ o~~o' ~' " `~ ~O N~ W o 3 N `n ~ ~~DiN„~ ° 16.11 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ai r~ ~c ~: rk1 ~ GI V ~m~ ~~~ ~~ ~ Z 16'11 ~~ ~~ ~~y~ ° Q o^~ z~ ~~1 ,N aO~E ~ ~ ~, 3 a~ x ~ ~ + ~ W Z vyi i ~ ' ~ \ ~~~ O~ N cUn -Zi 40 ~ ~ , ~' ~' - q.5 i i ~ ~~~ ~, ~~~ \ ~ ~ ~~ cL ~; a~4G111 0 ,ice ,/ii ,N~ N ~p ~ y ~ Oa- O~ p~ ~H ~ 7 Op ~ ` U1 Oa v 4v y ooh ~° \ ~r , ~ a d To ~~~ ° \b'1r ~'~ 3 .~ ~v \Z o +~-o V~Vp~ Oi~h = ink ~~ ~ v~ =NM ~ r1 ~~ C~ 1 = ~ \ ~~ i m ~ .~ M 1 ~ ~, o v r"'~ 3 ` "p m ~ Opt 30p0 =$ ( ..~G ' t *'~ N ~w Q~ ~ ~~~' Om^~ ~ ~ ~ , Q~ ~ ao t = ~ a~ ~~ ~ o j~ v-en~ y vo ° ~O c v rn ~ ~ \ ..- o N o o rno ~~ r.~ t o~3 ~~~ c ~ ~o-O, 9 maov ~~- m~lp ON~Z ~ ~ O vOc~O~ ~~ ~ a^ON ~~c~ ~~ v~i~~ncOp. t>~I~r ~ 003 . ,~.~ Cl~. BONN? ~~ ~0 cmcoo ~ 506'11 `~n~ ~Y~ ~., ~' ~~ a_ ' ° °p d. a vl 0 O O V 0044 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~• AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.6.a. Subject: Request Permission for an Existing Asphalt Pedestrian Trail to Encroach Within Two Variable Width Storm Water Management System Best Management Practice System Easements and a Thirty-Foot Sewer Easement Across Open-Space D, The Sanctuary At Watermill, Section A, and Open-Space C and Lots 25, 26, 27 and 28, The Sanctuary At Watermill, Section B County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Grant PMF LLC permission for an existing asphalt pedestrian trail to encroach within two variable width SWM/BMP easements and a thirty-foot sewer easement across Open-Space D, The Sanctuary At Watermill, Section A and Open-Space C and Lots 25, 26, 27 and 28, The Sanctuary At Watermill, Section B, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: PMF LLC has requested permission for an existing asphalt pedestrian trail to encroach within two variable width SWM/BMP easements and a thirty-foot sewer easement across Open-Space D, The Sanctuary At Watermill, Section A and Open- Space C and Lots 25, 26, 27 and 28, The Sanctuary At Watermill, Section B. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 0~~)04.5 VIII N ITY S KETCH Request Permission for an Existing Asphalt Pedestrian Trail to Encroach Within Two Variable Width Storm Water Irtanagement System Best 1-[anagement Practice System Easements and a Thirty Foot Sewer Easement Across Open-Space D. The Sanctuary At Watermill. Section A. and Open-Space C and Lots 25. 26. 27 and 28. The Sanctuary At Watermill. Section B FARC~~ DR REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A PROPQSED PEDESTRIAN ~- ASPHA,LT TRAIL T REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A ~ ~ ~~ PROPOSED ASPHALT PEf3ESTRl AN TRAI L i ~ ~~ 2 ~ p ~ A ~~ O ~ ~ ~~ i D ~ ~t ~Ca N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w ; .E s I I~cl - f,16.6T ket oL®®~~/ i ;, ~t ' o ; ~~ ;, ~~ cn ~ o o , ~ . ; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~.. ` ~ o ,~ ~ , ~~ ~ ~~ O,e.y / b / ~~ ~ Y' AN g ~ ~ c U ~Uq / // a / / / ~ 2 2 t p O O O ~ oah `a / / r ~ r~ Z~~ _ N / ki 25 y~5 `" a // / S19) JaP~D'JST 1GA} ~ / q~~ bi v N ~ \.9L 6LS ;~'~OtYrZ) (6~ i // / ..11~ V $ / ~ / ~~ y i/ O i ^1~2 ~'~I~ / / 2 A~2 // g 1 //~~ y ~2^ L2 F N rc~ / uun^r V^ ~ k ~ ~~ ~ "~' ~~ i '`~ m. ~ ~ n' ~p\ / ~ ~~ O ~ ` b ~ r V r g r G a 4 J. b r ~ C c / i,e ~ / ~~ ~' ~j ~ b ~ ? ~ ~ 4 ~l ~ ~ b ~ ,~•I S'E 1N•~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m ll"" m N ~ ' i V 4i ~ ~ N "Ot~~ \~, ' ePa~ ae~ ~ M ~1 ~ ~ a~ ( r~ w a'' ' ~ q a aro y N , a a a b ~ p N. •iG~ ~'S . d y y,~ ~ ~,gre'Uf r ~ ~ i O = v0 ~ ~ti ~ _ ~ v t ~ ~ O1 ~ ~~ i _ A F ~ o ~ I ~ ~ ~re'Ii'~ ~'B1' ' a x ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~ u _ -, ~~ a ~ ~ ~ NWIQ'iJ'E Yµ~ ~ °_ n v, ~ ` {{.. \ '~ ~` W ~yp'Ia'iJ'E 1.079 I I F ~ V P'..n ~\ I u O q N Y ~ ~ w ~ ~ a 4 `~ v ~ 1~ I ~~ ~~ 4 i Y C S MR737b7F ?7 J.06•~I i 4 i ~2 ~ _ b 4i ~ V H 1 1 1 b~ N L;~ ~P 1 ~1 0 y9'I9t r' ~ ~T~ ~ b ~ ~ '~ ~ ~~ ?? ~ ~ 1 i ' ~ E ~ ~ Si (J ~ \oniF Nq~b :/' I I SaS b ~ ~~ b ~~ ~~ `H~~ ~~ j ~~ 4 mT~c I ^n / / ~, !+ 4 ~ y ~ R22F \ ~~~ ( ~~ \ ~~0 0 R yFCI \ ~~~ \l C/ X111 ~ I m~ a_ p \ ~ ~I 1 ! I~pO~ !1 a+ ~ ~ JI I I .,u ~°o ~~~ V ~ ~ ~~ /~~~ ~ i/~ ~~~~A a a ^' > ~ ~\ 11, ago n / ~ 9 Ns ~ 1 ~~a v c11 G my~m v~ \1 COy~, 4 ,` ', m n ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ n 0 ~ V n a ~ u~ ~ a ~ 4 ~ 4 n •. G a 4 N ` p y b ro r ~ ~ ~ ~ b + ~ ~ . ' . ''y .. v v v ' pG $0 .. g , g 0 O , y a O 4 . ~ {~ O O • ~ 0 v ~ b ~ aa A 4 ~ nl = 2 2 ` 2 w r ti ~ # q ~ JO V V " q v N ~ , a N • iai ~ ~ ~ o v w a a v „ i ~' v Yd v , v , q V a ~ o ~ s ~ cn q a 9 s ~. a ~ 4 • 4 \ \ O_ C ~ ~M m ~ \ Cm ~• m d a a 4 O~ ~ ~ N 1\ ~j 4 l ~, ~ \ da i; ~ ~ p 60 m~€ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PLAT SHOWINGAPROPOSED S~~g k3gd~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ o ~ Q c N ~ g ~ 6' WALKING TRAIL BETWEEN TWO VARIABLE f ~~~ ~~~5 g s~ ~ $ g 1l ~ ~_ 3 ~ WIDTH SWM/BMP EASEMENTS I_>; cNn~ 1 & ~ ~ w~TOt~asrnlcr aE3 ~ e °~ '~ ~ ~~ a~ cnES~nFl~n courrtr, hnclNU ~ N VVVV~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~» AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.6.b. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Gravel Driveway to Encroach Within Fifty- Foot Unimproved County Right of Way Off of Woods Edge Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Grant Angela C. Ragsdale permission for a proposed gravel driveway to encroach within 50' unimproved county right of way off of Woods Edge Road, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Angela C. Ragsdale has requested permission for a proposed gravel driveway to encroach within 50' unimproved county right of way from Point A to Point B as shown on the attached sketch to access property at 14445 Woods Edge Road. This request has been reviewed by county staff and Comcast Cablevision. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager #oao048 VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission fora Proposed Gravel Driveway to Encroach Within Fifty Foat Unimproved County Right of Way off of Waads Edge Road ~, s ~ o ~4 ° -~ ~ ~- ~ ~ REQUEST: PB~MiSSION FOR ~ APROPOSED GRAVEL[3RlVEWAY oy 0 ~ lw~~ v R ~ ~R~Fk ~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~ L N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities , w E s t tra - uesr >pet oi.lo0"!/ ' ~ A>ogela C. Ragsdale ~, ~oPOSEV 14445 Woods Edge Rd. ~~~'~~ DB. 8774 PG. 454 .s~.oo' e1 D0~ PIN: 806644492000000 so.oo g ' ° DINT 15' Gravel Driveway 59.39 1 LICENSED AREA °~ ~ ~~ POINT A - B 672'; N p~2CEt 2 82 ~ICRES x , (79.188 SQ FT.) _ 20.15' a a°o ~ 206 Z1 ' 1 SZ978'15'W -- (NEW 1) PRgPERTY EwSANG UNE} Q D ^ °~" E o0 ! 1~AR~~ES '~ N ~ ~~ N (48. ~~ 116.11' 4241 I ~hO,~ EXIS~-N~ , sT~ ~ ~ o a 1 ~, BRICKdtfRA1-~ ac a DW£tUMC o d ~ N O~~ - ~ ~m 21~~~ , c"rrFtR ~E a h O~ I AU r 644024900000 C _ 0 g06 GPfN: pg. Igo? PG.1 Z10 I ~ POINT.A _ EDGE .ROAD WpOD's 08AN~288-1 0~00~0 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY - - ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 4 "'° AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.7. Subject: Approval of Design, Appropriation of Funds, Authorization to Proceed with Right-of-Way Acquisition, Authorization to Enter into Agreements, and Authorization to Award a Construction Contract for the Chalkley Road Curve Realignment Project North of Ecoff Avenue County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board is requested to take the following actions for the Chalkley Road Curve Realignment Project: 1) approve the design; 2) appropriate $1,127,600 in Traffic Shed 13 road cash proffers; 3) authorize staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition; 4) authorize the advertisement of an eminent domain public hearing, if necessary, to acquire the right-of-way; 5) authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities; 6) authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT and environmental permit/mitigation agreements; and 7) authorize the award of a construction contract(s), up to $400,000, to the lowest responsible bidder(s). Summary of Information: In May 2008, the Board appropriated $100,000 road cash proffers and authorized staff to proceed with design of the Chalkley Road curve realignment project north of Ecoff Avenue. The purpose of the project is to improve the safety along Chalkley Road north of Ecoff Avenue by realigning the existing curve and providing adequate shoulders. The project is estimated to cost $1,227,600. Preparers R.J.McCracken Agen728 Attachments: ^ Yes Title:__ Director of Transportation Na # 0~®®51 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 4 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) Construction plans are substantially complete. Construction plans are available in the Transportation Department. A total of ten parcels will be directly impacted by the project. No residents will be relocated. Right-of- way and easements will need to be acquired across the frontage of the parcels in order to construct the project and adjust utilities. At least one parcel will have significant right-of-way acquisition impacts. Staff met with seven of the eight property owners directly impacted by the project during the plan development and explained the proposed design. The property owners were generally supportive of the project. Most were aware of the accidents along the road and understood the need for the proposed improvements. Minor design revisions were made to address property owner requests. Staff was unable to contact one property owner. As a result of the meetings, staff concluded the customary formal citizen information meeting would provide no additional information and was unnecessary. A letter has been sent to each landowner advising them that Board approval of the design was being requested at this Board meeting. Staff will attempt to negotiate a settlement for all of the right-of-way acquisition. If settlements cannot be reached, staff requests authorization to advertise a public hearing for eminent domain proceedings. Staff is also requesting authorization to advertise and award a construction contract, up to $400,000, to the lowest responsible bidder. Upon the Board's approval, right-of-way acquisition will begin immediately. Construction is expected to begin in the summer of 2010, dependent upon utility relocations, with completion expected within 60 days. Q'~®Q~i~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 4 AGENDA Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Approve the design of the Chalkley Road Curve Realignment Project; 2 . Appropriate $1, 127, 600 in Traffic Shed 13 road cash proffers for the Chalkley Road Curve Realignment Project; 3. Authorize staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition; 4. Authorize the advertisement of an eminent domain public hearing, if necessary, to acquire the right-of-way; 5. Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities; 6. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT and environmental permits/mitigation agreements; and 7. Authorize the award of a construction contract, up to $400,000, to the lowest responsible bidder. District: Bermuda 1~flOO~3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY '~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 4 of 4 -- AGENDA 1799 Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board: 1) approve the design; 2) appropriate $1,127,600 in Traffic Shed 13 road cash proffers; 3) authorize staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition; 4) authorize the advertisement of an eminent domain public hearing, if necessary, to acquire the right-of-way; 5) authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities; 6) authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT and environmental permit/mitigation agreements; and 7) authorize the award of a construction contract(s), up to $400,000, to the lowest responsible bidder(s)for the Chalkley Road Curve Realignment Project. Sufficient funding is available in Traffic Shed 13. Upon approval of this item sufficient funding will be available to complete this project. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 0~04~4 CHALKLEY RQAD REALIGNMENT NQRTH OF ECC)FF AVENUE 0~00~5 CHALKLEY ROAD CURVE REALIGNMENT PROJECT EXPENSES Prelimina En ineerin $62,500 Ri ht-of-Wa $191, 000 Utili Relocation $272,000 Construction En ineerin $ 42,100 Construction $400,000 Construction Contin enc $100,000 Miti ation $160,000 TOTAL $1,227,600 REVENUE Ma 2008 Traffic Shed 13 $100,000 Februa 2010 Pendin Traffic Shed 13 $1,127,600 TOTAL $1,227,600 0~~~~~ "~ ~-1~ I .; ~r - .. -- ~ ~~~ I ~j f I ~' _ c 4~ O .-yy yy m_ I _. ^~: ~ . ~~(~~IrUbC ~ i ey ~~ t~' g~ Y, .; f~~~n , ;i p ~ 9~ ~~~ a~y ~ X, ~+~Ym~Y I j rl ~.' ~ i .. ~ + ~r~ IIEMO'.E;: Iru:rocnrci ~-f ;~ I i t 6~s L f( t tr~~ I-~ t~ ..~rrl lr _ - ;: 7 ( r77rrr ~ jy 5' r Y T i (p ~ 1r. ti' r t G1 •4S r1A O ~ ~~45 ,r SS l i S r ~~ Li~ os°n~~ < ~V ~t~ <t ~ C jtlr tl, 4 ( S t .. ,..__., (dd + G .d* a r y l ~ i __- -' ~ ~ ~. ~' ~ I h r ~, 1 I l~~ r r> 7~ > `` r 1 4 l f~ t f l Z ri ~. 7 x !, ,> ,~ ', z . _, t - P~ J ~ I ~ r'~ ~ snrrs-r ~~. ~• . 1 f ' I 31140 W4~ ` 't +! n i'Y ^ 't.f t .~. ~i~at LLAi n ~ ~ ~ ~ a' ' r. L .~' qtr ~ 7 ' q : ,? ~ sTA I m a .qp -- f +rt ciuocswn viceafe~xce ~.af.w..• TIMMQNS GROUP .••':''~. ~~~~ fI~ Dnds/w~t dal 71rlb~n Td~l+ll ~ ~ ~ Y c~a~~.~r war cuRVe °~~ ~~ '"s iEawws~wlcr-c~s*eo-~nccw,.-vw4w ! ~" ~ $ ~ ~ ; CHALKLEY ROAD PLAN SHEET it irrN.rrwYnwir~ir r~r _I+4.Nr rr~r ~wwrr..ir .~.r narr MATCHLINE SHEET 3 - S7A Yl*50.00 .+. ~' $~ rr.„ :~srar.». w .tit _ __ >W ...~I~_. _ - - ~•<~ • I 7~ ~.`~ -.c r ~ a~~ ~~~~ n a ? ~ ~• r i'~ mw ~ = ~ ~ t ~ ., ;, .. _i rt_ ;I ~ _ _ ___. -- ~~ Imo," i 1 ~ _~„~=" '~ _ _ ~ 1 ~ +:; ~~i ~tFi.NC~gpEi ~ IAkI CCIiF) 1 ; •:• ~ N ~m I I 4, 1111_ ~ -d ... ~ a~.~ - _ ~~ I. r 'i•, ~g ~. I r ' 'l 1f - - - - - -. . V ~ i ~~ Tt_ I _. ~i I ! ~- r ~ .4x ~ ~ i ~ , , .r 1, - n. I., ~ ity ,. rvrf l lr~on. s~ ;~ ~ 1 ~ ~ .,, IQfIN d'TfleEl A]! aJ~LL $ ~ •' ~.~~,~ ~~i~F ~ I A I t l I~t w4 ~js~J5l~gl~ o 0 0 0 ~~~ 1 ~ ,~ ~ I. ;~_, ~ ~~~ g ~~ ga~ ~i:g Q ~yY w, ~Y 1 I i i ~ ~ ~ :i;. Q~Z " ~p~ a=,n Y, - 1 j ~ I1 1, it ~ II 9~ P" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ RZ '. re ~~~ ° ~ s f ~ ~ 4 I +~. ~B]lal~~~ ~` tin ~~ b., ~ ~~ r„ ,~ ~„~;' ~s~ ~~ 6 .+ 4 C i ,°d c~G x Q t2 ~. ~ r II +1 I ~+~~ > ~4 s~~~ C' ti ~ - I~I t 40¢ b s .},~ c~~~ ~, i t I Its ~ C •t . ~ ~ a F ~ i ~ °' 'W~ ~ 7~ 7 j '- w ~ ~-__- __ -- - ~ ~ ., .~ i; 4~ --- ----'-- -'--- 3A09Y3NtlHDLVIY ~g 1 II _ i S ~~ ~ ~®~~8 ,~I ,NO,ae aHr~r~lvw m.x~s~ w ssueta.n ...s.wv.. T I M M 4 N S G RQ U P .••':''~. ~'~`~°~" flb Owtla~t RrWalfal 7sIwsYYdlw TMswIIsN ~ CHALKLEY YilET CURVE e :, ~! °3 ]! i iFaI+.OS 015*sKT-f,ESTRflFf.0 C04MTV-y7sGMi~ s g ^ ^ ~ a '] ~ i & CHALKLEY Rt~ID PLAN SHEET - CHESTERFIELD COUNTY *~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.8. Subject: Transfer of Funds for the Brandermill Headwall Replacement Project County Administrator: Board Action Reauested: The Board is requested to transfer $43,000 from the General Road Improvement Account to the Brandermill Headwall Replacement Project. Summary of Information: The headwalls of three culverts under secondary roads in the Brandermill community are deteriorating and need to be replaced. The culverts serve as golf cart/ trail grade separations and drainage structures. Improvements to the deteriorated headwalls are necessary to stabilize the earth and road above the culverts and prevent excessive damage to the road above the culverts. Maintenance of these culverts would typically be the responsibility of the property owner under a separate maintenance agreement. However no one has been able to find any agreement transferring maintenance to the property owner. There is some urgency so it is important to proceed with corrective actions to prevent future deterioration. The estimated cost for this project is $118,000. Even in the absence of an agreement both the property owner and the Brandermill Community Association are participating in funding the project, contributing $60,000 and $15,000 respectively of the estimated cost. The property owner has requested funding assistance from the county, totaling $43,000. If the Board wishes to assist in the project, $43,000 should be transferred from the General Road Improvement Account for the project. The property owner will manage the construction work. The county's involvement will be limited to supplying culverts for the project. Eventually, if the road had to be repaired by VDOT because it is in the state system, the cost of the repair would likely reduce future monies available in the six-year road improvement plan. (Continued on next page) Preparers R.J. McCracken agen730 Attachments: Yes Title: Director of Transportation No # ~~~o~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Recommendation: If the Board wishes to assist in the project, $43,000 should be transferred from the General Road Improvement Account for the Brandermill Headwall Replacement Project. District: Clover Hill (~~0®~~ _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 - AGENDA ~. Budget and Management Comments: The Board is requested to transfer $43,000 from the General Road Improvement Account to the Brandermill Headwall Replacement Project. Sufficient funding is available in the General Road Improvement Account to transfer $43,000 to this project. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ®~®~~~ HEADWALL REPLACEMENTS gRANDERM~LL P~f HEADWALL REPLACEMENTS 3 c m -o ^ zni~ o 00002 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.9. Subject: Authorize the County Administrator to Transfer Funds and Execute Change Order Number One for the Construction Contract for the Asphalt Pathway at Robious Landing Park County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to transfer $24,542.96 from the Parks Improvements Contingency Account and execute Change Order Number One in the amount of $24,542.96 for the Robious Landing Park pathway construction contract with Southern Paving Corporation. Summary of Information: The change order will amend the contract to cover increased costs and expenses for additional sub-soil stabilization, stone sub-base stabilization, and additional undercut and on-site disposal of unsuitable topsoil to complete the asphalt pathway at Robious Landing Park. Unforeseen site conditions have necessitated the additional work. The project provides safe walking access into the Park, constructing a path approximately one-fourth of a mile long from the Park entrance to the interior Park facilities adjacent to the James River. A number of people from the nearby neighborhoods and from overflow parking areas at the James River High School were forced to walk down the roadway, with its vehicular traffic, to reach these facilities. The path runs parallel to the park entrance road and will eliminate this conflict. Funding is available from CIP Park Improvements Contingency Account Center. Parks and Recreation staff recommends approval. Preparers Michael S. Golden Title: Director. Parks and Recreation Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # 0000l~3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 -- AGENDA 1719 Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board authorize the County Administrator to transfer funds and execute Change Order Number One in the amount of $24,542.96 for the Robious Landing Park pathway construction contract with Southern Paving Corporation. The original pathway construction budget was $75,000. The paving contract was awarded to Southern Paving the lowest responsible bidder for $31,383. Upon approval of this change order the total pathway construction will cost $55,926 which is below the original budget. After accepting Southern Paving's bid the department used budgetary savings to fund other improvements at Robious Landing Park. Therefore, a transfer is requested to cover the cost of change order number one. Upon approval of this transfer sufficient funds will be available to complete the project. Preparers Allan M. Carmodv Title: Director, Budget and Management 00004 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.10. Subject: Appropriation of $250,000 Received from the Henricus Foundation to the Parks and Recreation Department's Capital Budget for Construction of the "Rocke Hall" Building and Authorization to Award and Execute a Construction Contract County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board is requested to: 1) appropriate $250,000 in funds received from the Henricus Historical Foundation to the Parks and Recreation Department's Capital Budget for the construction of the "Rocke Hall" building at Henricus Historical Park; and 2) authorize the County Administrator to award and execute a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Summary of Information: The Henricus Foundation has delivered a check for the funds for this project. The County's agreement with the Henricus Foundation requires administration and public procurement of capital projects in excess of $100,000. This project will construct the exhibit structure called "Rocke Hall", which will be used to interpret cultural and architectural aspects that are important to the understanding of the Henricus settlement and the early development of residential building styles in Virginia. This structure will greatly assist in the planned programs and events for the Henricus 400"' Anniversary celebration in 2010 and 2011. The bidding of the project is currently underway and construction of "Rocke Hall" during the summer of 2010 would allow for completion in time for Henricus Publick Days in September 2010. Preparers Michael S. Gold~;n Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # 000065 17x8 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Budget and ManaQerrw'ent Comments: This item requests that the Board: 1) appropriate $250,000 in funds received from the Henricus'Historical Foundation to the Parks and Recreation Department's Capital, Budget for the construction of the "Rocke Hall" building at Henricus Historical Park; and 2) authorize the County Administrator to award and execute a 'construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. This project funding is solely provided by the Henricus Historical Foundation. The Parks and Recreation Department is administering this project per the County's agreement with the Henricus Historical Foundation. Upon approval, the project appropriation would be sufficient for the award of the construction contract. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management 0~®0~6 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.11.a,., Subject: Set Date for a Public Hearing to Consider Siting of the Proposed Dominion Virginia Power Industrial Landfill County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Set a public hearing for April 14, 2010 to consider the proposed Dominion Virginia Power waste management facility to be located at the Dutch Gap electric power plant. Summary of Information: The Board's agenda includes a request from Dominion Virginia Power for zoning of property for use as an industrial landfill. If the property is zoned for such use, the County Code requires that the proposed solid waste management facility receive approval from the Board of Supervisors as to the siting and management and disposal operations of the facility. The criteria for approval are that the proposal poses no substantial present or potential danger either to the health, safety or welfare of any person or the environment. In August 2009, Dominion Virginia Power (Owner and Applicant) submitted the applications and documentation required to meet the requirements of the Code in their process to gain approval for a Fossil Fuel Combustion Products Management Facility. An environmental engineering consultant was retained by General Services to assist in the analysis of the documentation and to verify that all the application requirements were met by the submission. Preparers Robert C. Key Title: Director of General Services Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # Q~OO~"7 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA This analysis enables county staff to perform a review of the proposed operations and the location and general design of the facility in order to make determinations on the potential impacts of such a facility on the county. All of the potential concerns of General Services' staff have been adequately addressed in the application documents or in the proffered conditions outlined in the zoning case. Approval will allow the applicant to apply for a Waste Management Operations permit from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ). This application process includes a comprehensive technical review of the science and engineering of the facility as provided by the regulatory authority granted VADEQ through both state and federal regulations. VADEQ is also responsible for the design, construction, and oversight of the facility. Thus, the review and approval by the Board is the initial step in a multi- step process designed to protect the safety of citizens and the environment. The County Code requires that the Board of Supervisors hold a public hearing concerning the approval of the siting of the proposed waste management facility. Staff recommends that this public hearing be set for April 14, 2010. ~~0~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY __ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 ~~~ AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.11.b. Subject: Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to Chesterfield County Code Sections 4-21 and 4-36 Relating to the Definition of Kennel and the License Tax Imposed on Kennels County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Set public hearing for April 14, 2010, to consider the attached ordinance amendments. Summary of Information: On February 10, 2010, the Board amended the County's zoning ordinance to allow three dogs by right in residential areas. It has come to Staff's attention that the definition of kennel in Chapter 4 of the County Code and the license tax imposed on kennels is predicated on a kennel being defined as having three or more dogs. As a result, there is an inconsistency between the zoning ordinance and §§ 4-21 and 4-36 of the County Code. Accordingly, Staff is proposing the attached ordinance amendments to ensure consistency within the County Code and to impose a license tax only on owners of four or more dogs under § 4-36 of the County Code. Preparers Steven L. Micas Title: County Attorney 1305:83228.2(83230.1) Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 0~®0~9 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 4-21 AND 4-36 RELATING TO DEFINITION OF KENNEL AND LICENSE TAXES ON KENNELS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 4-21 and 4-36 of the Code of the County o Chester geld 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec.4-21. Definitions. 000 Kennel: An enclosure in compliance with chapter 19 in which twee four or more dogs, four months or older, are kept and from which they cannot escape. 000 Sec. 4-36. License taxes--Amounts; exception. (a) The following license taxes are hereby levied: (1) Male or female dog: $7.00. (2) Unsexed male or female dog: $5.00 upon presentation of a veterinarian's certificate certifying that the dog is unsexed or, if such certificate is unattainable, a written statement from the owner certifying that the dog is unsexed. (3) Kennel: For between twee four and 20 dogs, $25.00. (4) Kennel: For between 21 and 50 dogs, $35.00. 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0~00~~ 1905:83230.1 179 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.12. Subject: Award a Contract for the Installation and Maintenance of Landscape Improvements to the Midlothian Turnpike Median County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to execute a bid award to RSG Landscaping and Lawn Care, Inc. in the amount of $309,013.00 for the installation of landscaping and five-year maintenance of landscaping materials for an annual amount of $46,380.00 (adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index) in the median of Midlothian Turnpike in the Chesterfield Towne Center - Southport Area. Summary of Information: Landscaping improvements are proposed for a mile and one-half median section of Midlothian Turnpike between the Alverser Drive intersection and the Johnston Willis Drive intersection. On October 28, 2009, the Board of Supervisors approved this project and established a service district of benefiting property owners to finance the installation and maintenance of high quality landscaping. This bid award is lower than the design consultant installation estimate of $364,000 and annual maintenance estimate of $68,000. Preparers Thomas E. Jacobson Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Revitalization ^ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 '~' AGENDA Budget and Management Comments: The original financial projection for the landscape improvements along Midlothian Turnpike included a pay back period of five years. However, due to lower than estimated installation and maintenance costs along with 2010 property assessment results that were in line with the projection, it is now expected that the county's investment can be paid back in full within four years. The revised pay back period scenario is also consistent with the county's current forecast for future trends in commercial property values. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management ~~®®~az f -i ~ f 'j w~ ~ ~ y~ s ~ `'fie x~. ,~ , ~n..a+''f' ~+,vrq~., ~y '. r~~a, 9Y :.. ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~, 4' ~ ~ !!s ~ . ~' may`'' R ~~ ~~i. .' ~~" y~.~ ~ r r Y o ' ~ __ ~~~ _ ~. ~. 4 - ~ '~ T _ n kP , w ~r ~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R, s ~ '~^~ ;,, ' ~ ;_ ~ _~~ . ~. "~ ~..• ~ , fir- r. - s~}s ~1i1-' ~ Po. ~ w G, ~ k ~ y . ~' .~ ~`' ~~ 5, ~ ~ s t ,y ~. .{c ' ~-~ _ : c jai ~ ~ ~'' - ~ . vv i a ate' - r K~ • .. s ~ ~, .~ ,:~ J ~ )•~ 1 Y t h;_~i ./ ~{Y c?.-' e~ ~ is t 4`4"s~lfit'4« a ~L • .- ~ ~ t y +if``' _ Lea ittr ~,.'~, '~ ~ ~~ x f ~ ti~ ~ :~ ~, ._ ._ ,.. ~,, v~ - xT_ ~` r ~~~ ~,.s CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.13. Subject: Authorize the Receipt and Appropriation of Grant Funds in the Amount of $98,571.00 from the State Homeland Security Program Grant County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Fire and EMS Department, Office of Emergency Management, to receive and appropriate $98,571.00 in grant funds from the State Homeland Security Program Grant for heavy tactical rescue team equipment, practical exercise and training for the Division 1 - Regional Technical Rescue Team. Summary of Information: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the acceptance and appropriation of $98,571 in grant funds from the State Homeland Security Program Grant for heavy tactical rescue team equipment and practical exercises and training for the Division 1 - Regional Technical Rescue Team. Chesterfield Fire & EMS is the sponsoring agency of the Division 1 - Regional Technical Rescue Team and manages the administrative aspects of the funding from this grant award in conjunction with the Henrico County, Division of Fire. There are no matching funds required. Preparers Edward L. Senter, Jr. Title: Chief, Fire and EMS Department Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # 0€~0~'74 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 - AGENDA ~~.a Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board approve the receipt and appropriation of $98,571.00 in grant funds from the State Homeland Security Program Grant to the Chesterfield Fire and EMS department for heavy tactical rescue team equipment, practical exercise and training for the Division 1 - Regional Technical Rescue Team. The grant allows for the funding of $98,571.00 to be used over three years, with quarterly reimbursements to the county. There is no local match required or ongoing operational impacts. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management O~DOO'75 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 4 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.14. Subject: Approval of Design, Authorization to Proceed with Right-of-Way Acquisition and Construction, Authorization to Award Construction Contract, Authorization to Enter into Agreements, and Transfer of Funds for the Route 10 Widening (Frith Lane to Greenyard Road) Bond Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: n The Board is requested to: 1) approve the design for the Route 10 Widening (Frith Lane to Greenyard Road) Bond Project; 2) authorize staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition and construction of the project; 3) authorize the Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities; 4) authorize the award of a construction contract, up to $3,430,000, to the lowest responsible bidder; 5) authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT and environmental permits/mitigation agreements; and 6) transfer $900,000 from the completed Beulah Road 2004 bond referendum project. Summary of Information: In 2004, voters overwhelmingly approved a $40 million bond referendum for highway improvements. The county designated $5 million of the referendum for the Route 10 widening project. In August 2008, the Board authorized staff to begin design. The design has now been substantially completed. Preparers R.J.McCracken agen731 Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Transportation xo #0000'6 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 4 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) Major design features of the project are as follows: • Dual left turn lanes will be provided from Route 10 to Beach Road and Route 10 will be widened to six lanes. • The existing crossover on Route 10 at Wagners way/Magnolia Grange will be closed. • Left turns from Beach Road to Krause Road will be prohibited. • A campus sign installation package is proposed to help improve traffic flow in the immediate area. Detailed construction plans of the project are available for review in the Transportation Department. Staff met with the individual property owners directly impacted by the project, Historical Society representatives, and Historic Preservation Committee representatives during the plan development and explained the proposed design. A letter identifying major aspects of the project was sent to indirectly impacted owners in the immediate area. As a result of the meetings and mailings, staff concluded the customary formal information meeting would provide no additional information and was unnecessary. A letter has been sent to the owners and representatives advising them staff intends to seek Board approval of the design at this Board meeting. There is strong support for the project. Most of the project can be constructed within existing right-of-way; however, approximately 1.7 acres of right-of-way / easements will need to be acquired involving approximately 25 parcels. A summary of the anticipated right-of-way acquisitions is attached. No families or businesses will be relocated. If the Board approves the design, right-of-way acquisition will begin immediately with construction expected to begin in late summer 2010 or early spring 2011, depending on how quickly utility relocations can be completed. The current estimated cost of the project is approximately $5.9 million ($0.3M Engineering, $1.7M Right-of-way, and $3.9M for Construction). The estimate exceeds identified funding. Staff recommends that $900,000 be transferred from the completed Beulah Road 2004 bond referendum reconstruction project to make up the shortfall. Market conditions are favorable for advertising the project as quickly as possible. Staff should also be authorized to advertise and award a construction contract up to $3,430,000 to the lowest responsible bidder. Q~®®~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 4 AGENDA Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Approve the design for the Route 10 (Frith Lane - Greenyard Road) Bond Widening Project; 2. Authorize staff to acquire right-of-way for the project, including advertising of an eminent domain public hearing if necessary; 3. Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities; 4. Award a construction contract, up to $ 3,430,000, to the lowest responsible bidder(s); 5. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT and environmental permits/mitigation agreements; and 6. Transfer $900,000 from completed 2004 Beulah Road bond project. District: Dale and Bermuda CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 4 of 4 AGENDA sue Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board: 1) approve the design for the Route 10 Widening (Frith Lane to Greenyard Road) Bond Project; 2) authorize staff to proceed with right-of-way acquisition and construction of the project; 3) authorize the Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of utilities; 4) authorize the award of a construction contract, up to $3,430,000, to the lowest responsible bidder; 5) authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT and environmental permits/mitigation agreements; and 6) transfer $900,000 from the completed Beulah Road 2004 bond referendum project. The current appropriation for this project is $5,000,000 funded with 2004 bond proceeds. Sufficient funding is available in the completed Beulah Road project to transfer. Upon approval of this item sufficient funding will be available to complete this project. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Mana ement ®'~®0~~ ROUTE 10 (FRITH TO GREENYARD) PROJECT REVENUE DATE AMOUNT SOURCE 8/27/08 $ 400,000 2004 Bond Referendum FY2010 A ro riation $4,600,000 2004 Bond Referendum 2/24/10 Proposed Transfer $ 900,000 Completed Beulah Road 2004 Bond Referendum Pro'ect TOTAL $5,900,000 ROUTE 10 (FRITH TO GREENYARD) PROJECT ESTIMATE Prelimin En ineerin $ 330,900 Ri ht-of--Way $1,049,650 Utili Relocation $ 225,000 Construction En ineerin $ 145,800 Construction $3,430,933 Construction contin enc $ 597,717 Si na e $ 120,000 Miti ation $ 0 Total $5,900,000 ®~®~~~ ROUTE 10 (FRITH LANE - GREENYARD ROAD) WIDENING PROJECT 7i2sios ©~®031 of W oo a\ ~ ~ N ti C O O ~ h V l~ N N ~ M ~--~ l~ M ~' M O~ N M N ~/'~ N .~ ~t ~ M ~ N O M ~--~ ~ M 00 o0 [~ M O N O ~ ~ ~O ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~--~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O r-+ O O ~--~ O ' O O O O C O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ A ~ ~ 00 O~ 00 M ~ M \_O ~ , iw Q 0 0 0 0 O O O .L" O O C O O O O O •., ~i ~ 00 C~ 00 00 O~ ~--~ \p O~ 00 ~t ~ [~ l~ O ~O O Q~ ~ l~ ~ '~ ~--~ C~ ~ l~ 00 N M M 00 M ~ ~ O V1 M ~O M ~t O ~C N ~ 01 00 l~ 00 00 \G --y ~h .--~ v') .--+ 00 l~ 00 ~ 00 l~ ~ [~ to ti M N N N N N N N ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ N ~ ~--~ O C~ O~ C~ ~ ~--~ .--~ O~ O O~ O~ G~ O~ O~ O~ O O O O O N M M M M O O O~ h 0 '~ ° '~ ° ~ ~ ~ 77O ^ .~ ~ 3 o ~ 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 ° ~ ~ ~ Z ' 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z o ~ ~ U ~ a~ U U ~ ~ U U ~ ~ O U ~ a o ~ ~ ~ ... o ... a~ a s ~ ~ a a a a a 3 H 0 ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ H H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ,~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U - ~ a~ ~ o ,~ ~ ~ ~ 3 3 ~ o o r~ w ~ a N a ~ i ~ j ~ A., ~ > > Q o U Q c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U o U o U h a .~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j, ~ .~ ~ ~ a~ d a ~3 v~ ~ ,~ U 4 ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ a a d ~ ;~ w w wl fw ~, ~ W ~ w ~ '~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~, ., ° ~ a~ ~ ~ ° o o U ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ 3 ~ x x ~ x ~ ~ ° U w ~ a U ~ U ~ U H o rw o U o U x t7 0 ~. 0 0 .~ 0 U 0 W -~ ~~ z° .~ 000032 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.15. Subject: Create a Committee to Review the Sign Ordinance and Report to the Board of Supervisors with Recommendations for Specific Areas Which Should Be Considered for Amendment County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Create a sign committee. Summary of Information: During the Board's consideration of three separate amendments to the County's sign regulations during its January 27t'' meeting, there was general discussion regarding the need to have an independent committee review all the County's zoning regulations pertaining to signs. The last comprehensive review of the County's sign regulations was completed April 24, 2001. That exercise involved a yearlong review completed by a representative from each of the sign companies working in Chesterfield, a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals and then a final review by the Chesterfield Business Council and the Chesterfield Chamber of Commerce. Ms. Durfee is recommending the creation of a new committee to perform a complete review of Chesterfield's sign regulations and report back to the Board with recommendations for specific areas that should be considered for amendment. It is recommended that the committee include the following representatives: Ms. Durfee - Board of Supervisors representative Preparers Kirkland A. Turner Title: Director of Plannina Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # p~®~1i33 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA One person to be selected from each of the following: Planning Commission Chesterfield Business Council Chesterfield Chamber of Commerce Richmond Association of Realtors Retail Merchants Association A citizen representative from each of the five magisterial districts It is anticipated that the committee will meet once a month for six months beginning in May in accordance with the following schedule: May - overview of county sign regulations and benchmark comparison with other localities June - review on-premise signs July - review directional signs August - review temporary signs September - review changeable copy signs October - prepare recommendation to Board of Supervisors Any recommendations made by the committee which the Board would like to consider are required to be first forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration. The Planning Commission must hold a public hearing and forward recommendations to the Board. At that time the Board must then schedule its own public hearing before adopting any changes to the sign ordinance. ODD®034 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY __ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 ,~. AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.D.16. Subiect: Approve the Appropriation of $24,142,946 and Authorization to Award a Construction Contract for the Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road) Widening Project County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to appropriate funds and authorize the award of a bid for the Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road) Widening project as indicated. Summary of Information: At the Board's January 27, 2010 meeting, the Board held a public hearing to consider appropriating $24,142,946 for the Route 10 widening project from I- 95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road and to authorize the County Administrator to award the road construction contract to the lowest responsive bidder. After the public hearing was held, the Board "voted" on the appropriation and the contract and "approved" it unanimously. However, after reviewing the audiotape of the meeting, it appears that no motion to approve was made and seconded. Preparers R. J. McCracken Title: Director of Transportation 0405:83232.1 Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # OJ0085 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA To comply with the Board's Procedures, this item has been placed on the Board's consent agenda so that it can be properly approved. Staff recommends approval. The minutes for the January 27, 2010 meeting will be written to reflect that no motion or second was obtained and that this agenda item is being presented to the Board at this meeting for approval. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board take the following actions for the Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road) Widening Project: 1) Appropriate $24,142,946 ($15,442,946 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements and $8.7 million in 2004 authorized General Obligation bonds); and 2) Authorize the County Administrator to award a construction contract, upon VDOT approval, up to $19,600,000, to the lowest responsible bidder for the Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road) widening project. ~IStCICt: Bermuda 0405(25):83232.1 0~®©~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~' AGENDA Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 9.A. Su_ biect: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Acceptance of attached report. Summary of Information: Preparers James J. L. Stegmaier Title: County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ©~00~'7 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE February 24, 2010 Board Meeting Date Description Amount Balance 07/01/09 FY2010 Beginning Budgeted Balance $53,495,000 ~fl®®~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS February 24, 2010 Board Meeting Date Description Amount Balance FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2008 4/9/2008 FY2009 Budgeted Addition $17,810,300 $22,647,488 4/9/2008 FY2009 Capital Projects (16,792,400) 5,855,088 6/24/2009 Tax Collection Customer Service project (244,400) 5,610,688 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2009 4/9/2009 FY2010 Budgeted Addition $13,946,400 $19,557,088 4/9/2009 FY2010 Capital Projects (13,946,400) 5,610,688 ~~~Q~~ eu R _> O _ N o00 O M O "fl L ~ ~ N ~ ~ v'^ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ N C~ ~ 6~9 '-, b9 b9 64 ~--~ 69 b4 v .fl b y, .~ R R o a1 ~ C O R "O ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~", V9 r.~+ Q ISM ~ N ~ N O Q z w .~ O F ~ A ~ N ~ l~ W O .0 +~~' N vl ON .~. ~ ~y N ~G fi i. N ,y R ~ O L a e ~ O C ° ° ° ° ° ° F., ~, o ° o o o o o o • rti G~7r ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ~t O ~ ~ L 0 v, L CO i ~O [~ I~ N o~0 0 ~ N O O O oo ~ L O~ M 00 00 M N ~ N 01 O ~, b9 .~ ~L R o, U ~ R x R C = 3 o ~ ~ o = A oq U O ~ ~ U ©~~®~~ Prepazed by Accounting Depaztment January 31, 2010 Date Began 04/99 O1/O1 03/03 03/04 10/04 12/04 12/04 OS/OS 05/06 08/07 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED AND EXECUTED Original Description Amount Public Facility Lease -Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project Energy Improvements at County Facilities Energy Improvements at School Facilities Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Expansion/Renovation, Equipment Acquisition TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Description None 13,725,000 6,100,000 21,970,000 16,596,199 1,519,567 427,633 14,495,000 11,960,000 22,220,000 125.113.399 Outstanding Date Balance Ends 01/31/2010 11/19 $8,050,000 11/21 6,735,000 11/23 4,180,000 11 /24 16,270,000 10/10 16,596,199 12/17 1,132,880 12/10 91,493 11/24 10,375,000 11/24 8,745,000 11/27 19,880,000 92.055.572 Approved Amount (~£~®~91 February 24, 2010 Speaker's List Afternoon Session 1. F~~r~£~ai~cila 745-0275 2. one 3. C~~is 683-3362 4. George Beadles 5. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 14.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Lottie Howlett Carolina on Her 104th Birthday County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Holland requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution recognizing Mrs. Lottie Howlett Carolina on her 104th birthday. Summary of Information: Mrs. Lottie Howlett Carolina will celebrate her 104th birthday on March 4, 2010. Mrs. Carolina was born and raised in the Bellwood-Kingsdale Road Community in Chesterfield County. Preparers Janice Blakley Title: Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 000092 RECOGNIZING MRS. LOTTIE HOWLETT CAROLINA ON HER 104TH BIRTHDAY WHEREAS, Mrs. Lottie Howlett Carolina was born in the Bellwood-Kingsdale Road Community in Chesterfield County on March 4, 1906; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Carolina has been a resident of that community all of her life until her declining health required that she move to an assisted care facility; and WHEREAS, at an early age, Mrs. Carolina became a member of First Baptist Church Centralia, where served as a member of the Deaconess Ministry, member and president of the Senior Choir, and a member of both the Church Interest Club and the Missionary Ministry; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Carolina was an active participant in the neighborhood garden club and loved to work with her shrubbery and flowers, sharing them with her neighbors and supplying flowers to decorate the church; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Carolina has a strong memory and still asks about her relatives, friends and church family; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Carolina still maintains her sense of humor, likes to hear funny stories, and can sometimes inject a bit of humorous irony into a conversation; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Carolina has served as a source of wisdom and encouragement, as well as a role model, for her family members and the community; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Carolina is one of Chesterfield County's most cherished senior residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of all Chesterfield County residents, recognizes the significant contributions of Mrs. Lottie Howlett Carolina, wishes her a happy 104th birthday, and is proud to have her as a resident of Chesterfield County. 000093 _~ February 24, 2010 Speaker's List Evening Session #1 (Following Presentation of Resolutions) 5~~.~ 1. Ewen Whitten 2. ~tt 3. Robert Wilson 4. Brenda Stewart 5. J Evening Session #2 (End of the Evening Agenda) ~• ~) L. J. McCoy ~~ Mar~rve ~~ Pat Campbell ~ Laurie Newill 5 ~~.r~r~ ~~~~,~~~~,~ BRENDA L. STEWART 5911 Woodpecker Road Chesfe~e/d, VA 23838 Phone/Fax: (804) 590-2309, E-mail: bl-stewart'a~comcast.net February 24, 2010 MEMORANDUM FOR CHESTERFIELD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUBJECT: SAT Scores in Chesterfield, Virginia and the Nation Enclosed are four pages of information to ponder as you consider the school budget. 1. Chart from the Superintendent's Quarterly Leadership Meeting of September 24, 2008 (retrieved from the Internet) 2. Chart for the 2009 SAT Scores posted on the CCPS Website (shows 2005 through 2009 SAT scores for critical reading, mathematics and writing for CCPS, Virginia, Nation) 3. Extract from Virginia Department of Education News Release of August 25, 2009 regarding 2009 SAT Results 4. Extract from Virginia Department of Education News Release of August 26, 2008 regarding 2008 SAT Results Questions raised by enclosed charts before any analysis: 1. Why are Chesterfield's students, who have socio-economic factors in their favor, not performing better on SATs? (Chart 1)? 2. Where did those SAT scores come from? (Chart 1) 3. Why are SAT scores on the CCPS website not labeled as to origin? They appear to be scores for high school seniors, including private and home- schooled seniors, based on the narrative in the second paragraph of Chart 4 (2008 SAT results). Including private and home-schooled raises the average. 4. Why is CCPS using the SAT scores that include private and home-schooled students for comparison? (Charts 2 and 4) 5. Why have we not received a greater return on our "investment" based on one of the more objective sets of pertormance--one more difficult to influence than SOLs? 2004 Approved Financial Plan Operating Budget Expenditures: $386.8M. FY 2009 equivalent: $595.SM. About five years and $209M later, after a budget increase of 54%, what have we purchased insofar as education? 6. Why has the School Board not included these issues in public discussion? ~ `~ ~. ~ •~ o ~ ;~ ~ i ~ ~~, U > Z ~~~ c~ ~ ~~ o -_ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ U ~ Z ^~ (/~ U U U ' ~j In C1 U U U~~~ L L ~I L = ~--- o ' ~, 0 ._ o V ~ v r- ~ uoi~eN L, ~ ~._~._._ ~ ________._ ~ ~ ; a~ '„~ ~ ~ -~ a~~~ -~ ti ~, sd~~ V1 _ ~ ~ `~ ° ~ ~ ~ uoi~eN ~ L O o ^~^~ ~ V a~ eiui6.~i c~ ^= to `n ./~ ~ ~ ~ ~- o~ ~~ .. ~ Q ~c ~ __ Sd~~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ uoi~eN ~ i. ~ ~ O c~ ~' o°o ~iui6ain ~ Q ~ ~ ~ _ U 0~ U, W ~ ~ ~~---~. ~~ ~.~ ~S ~ ~~ 2009 SAT Scores • 2,486 graduates (60 percent of all graduates) took the SAT tests Critical Reading Grou 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 CCPS 512 507 503 504 505 Vir inia 516 512 511 511 511 Nation 508 503 502 502 501 Mathematics Grou 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 CCPS 510 509 502 501 504 Vir inia 514 513 511 512 512 Nation 520 518 515 515 515 Writin Grou 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 CCPS na 495 486 485 486 Vir inia na 500 498 499 498 Nation na 497 494 494 493 Cha ~-~ ~ From: Virginia Department of Education News For Immediate Release August 25, 2009 Extracted from the Release above: 2009 SAT Results Virginia public school students achieved one-point increases in both critical reading and mathematics on the 2009 SAT while achievement on the relatively new writing component of the test dropped by one point. Virginia public school students continued to achieve at higher levels than public school students nationwide. • Virginia's public school average score of 509 in reading is 13 points higher than the nationwide public-school average. • The average mathematics score of 511 for Virginia public school students is one point higher than the national average for public school students. • The average Virginia public school writing score of 495 is eight points higher than the average writing score of public school test takers nationwide. In the last ten years, average scores of Virginia public school students on the SAT have increased by three points in reading and 14 points in mathematics. This compares with a national decline of six points in reading for public school students and a gain of two points in mathematics. A total of 47,100, or 58 percent, of Virginia public school graduates took the SAT - a 6.8 percent decrease from the previous year. The College Board attributes the decline to an increase in the number of students taking the rival ACT. The SAT, however, remains the dominant college entrance examination in Virginia. 2009 SAT Public School Mean Scores Critical Reading Mathematics Writing Group .Virginia Nation Virginia Nation Virginia Nation All Public School 509 496 511 .510 495 487 Students Asian 528 516 576 573 527 517 .Black 433 425 426 423 421 416 Hispanic 491 448 490 457 476 441 .White 535 524 534 536 518 512 ~c,,~ 3 Extract from Virginia Department of Education News For Immediate Release August 26, 2008 2008 SAT Results Virginia public school students achieved atwo-point increase over 2007 on the writing portion of the SAT and one-point increases in both critical reading and mathematics. The commonwealth's 508 average score in reading was 11 points higher than the national average for public school students while Virginia's public school average of 496 in writing was eight points higher than the nationwide mean. Virginia public school graduating seniors achieved an average score of 510 on the mathematics portion of the SAT, the same as their peers nationwide. A total of 50,465, or 63 percent, of Virginia public school graduates took the SAT compared with 51,677 in 2007. Virginia ranks tenth in the nation in public school participation in SAT testing. The overall average scores of Virginia high school seniors -including private and home-schooled students -increased in two areas. The overall averages of 512 in mathematics and 499 in writing each represented one-point improvements over 2007. The overall average score for reading was unchanged at 511. Recap: (My summary of above information) Critical Reading Mathematics Writing All public school students 508 510 496 High school seniors (including 511 512 499 Private and home-schooled) Chef- ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ,~, Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 17.A. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Amending §§ 15-96, 15-121, 15-122.2 15-133, 15-162 And 15-246, of the County Code Relating to the "Good Character" Standard for Certain Business Permits County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Amend §§ 15-96, 15-121, 15-122.2 15-133, 15-162 and 15-246, of the County Code relating to the "good character" standard for certain business permits. Summary of Information: Under state law, certain businesses in the County may only operate pursuant to a permit issued by the chief of police. Such businesses include precious metal dealers, solicitors, nightclubs, massage parlors, adult businesses, fortunetellers and massage clinics. For most of these businesses, the state enabling legislation, and the corresponding County ordinances, were enacted many decades ago. As was common for such local ordinances at that time, the permitting ordinances provide that the chief of police may deny a permit to operate one of these businesses 1) for objective reasons such as whether the owner has been convicted of a felony or any crime of moral turpitude, whether Preparers Steven L. Micas Title: County Attorney 0825(05):83096.2(83097.1) Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Oa0094 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA the owner has ever been denied a similar permit in the past or whether the owner has complied with all other County laws and regulations, or 2) for the more subjective reason that the owner is not of "good character" or "good moral character." This "good character" standard has been in common usage in permitting ordinances for many decades and is still found throughout the state in local permitting ordinances. Courts (both state and federal) have increasingly been invalidating as unconstitutional permitting ordinances that allow permits to be denied or revoked, on a finding by a public official that a business owner is not of "good character". The earliest of these cases concerned door-to-door solicitor permits, but courts have since invalidated permitting ordinances for many other types of businesses on constitutional grounds since they utilize a subjective "good character" standard. The County currently incorporates a "good character" standard for the issuance of permits for the following businesses: precious metal dealers, door-to-door solicitors, nightclubs, massage parlors, adult businesses, fortunetellers and massage clinics. Staff proposes that the permitting ordinances be amended to remove the "good character" standard but to retain all of the objective standards for denial of such permits which are currently contained in these ordinances. The proposed ordinance amendments are attached. Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached ordinance. 0825(05):83096.2(83097.1) ©~00~5 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 199'7, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 15-96, 15-121, 15-122.2, 15-133, 15-162 AND 15-246, OF THE COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE "GOOD CHARACTER" STANDARD FOR CERTAIN BUSINESS PERMITS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 15-96, 15-121, 15-122.2, 15-133, 15-162 and 15-246, of the Code ofthe Count~of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Chapter 15 REGULATED OCCUPATIONS AND SERVICES 000 ARTICLE V. MASSAGE CLINICS 000 Sec. 15-96. Granting of permit. Within 60 days of the date of the permit application, the chief of police shall issue the permit if he shall find all the following: (a) Any massage clinic to be used or constructed meets all zoning, building, plumbing, utility, health, electric and fire prevention codes, as reported by the applicable departments. (b) The applicant complies with all requirements of this article. (c) The applicant does not pose any threat to the community's health and safety. Any past felony, or misdemeanor convictions of the applicant, materially affectin tg he applicant's ability to conduct the permitted activity including a conviction pursuant to this article and a crime of moral turpitude, shall be considered in making this determination. (d) The applicant is at least 18 years old and complies with the requirements of Code of Virginia, §§ 54.1-3000 and 54.1-3029. (e) The applicant has not made any false, misleading or fraudulent statements in the permit application nor in any other related document required by the county. 000 ~~®096 0425:83097.1 ARTICLE VI. NIGHTCLUBS AND OTHER ADULT ENTERTAINMENT DIVISION 1. NIGHTCLUBS Sec. 15-121. Nightclub permit required from chief of police--Application; issuance. (a) Every person desiring a business license to operate a nightclub, as defined in chapter 6, shall first apply to the chief of police, or his designee, for a permit to conduct such activity. Each such application shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount of $25.00. (b) Information required on the permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) The applicant's full name, age, sex, race, weight, height, hair and eye color, address, telephone number, date and place of birth and social security number; (2) Names and addresses of references; (3) Whether the applicant has been convicted of any felony or misdemeanor and, if so, the nature of the offense, when and where convicted, and the penalty or punishment assessed; (4) Photograph and fingerprints of applicant; and (5) Name and address of the business for which a permit is sought. (6) Written authorization to conduct a background investigation of the applicant, including a criminal records check, and to investigate whether the information provided by the applicant is true. (7) Written declaration, dated and signed by the applicant, certifying that the information contained in the application is true and correct. (c) For a corporation, partnership or other legal entity, "applicant" includes each officer, director, partner or principal of the entity and any managers of the business. (d) The applicant shall not be issued a permit if the county's investigation or the information furnished in compliance with this article shows that the applicant has been convicted of a felony or any other crime materially affectin tg he applicant's ability to conduct the permitted activity including a crime involving moral turpitude, or has been denied a permit or has had a permit revoked under any statute or ordinance similar in substance to the provisions of this article, In addition, each application shall be reviewed by the county departments charged with enforcing the business license, zoning, building, plumbing, utility, health, electric and fire prevention codes, as needed, and no permit shall be issued if the applicant's business in the county does not comply with these and any other applicable county or state laws or regulations. ~~®~~~ 0425:83097.1 (e) Any changes in the ownership or principals of the business entity to which the permit is issued or in the managers of the business itself will automatically make the permit void. Such changes shall be reported to the chief of police or his designee, and a new application may be submitted for review. (f) Nightclubs shall be subject to the regulations regarding public dance establishments, set forth in chapter 3. DIVISION 2. ADULT BUSINESSES Sec. 15-122.2. Same--Issuance. (a) The chief of police or his designee shall grant or deny an application within 30 days of its proper filing, unless information requested from other law enforcement agencies is not received within that 30-day period, in which case the chief of police or his designee shall have an additional 30 days to act on the application. Upon the expiration of the applicable time period, unless the applicant requests and is granted a reasonable extension of time, the applicant shall be permitted to begin operating the business for which the permit is sought, unless and until the chief of police or his designee notifies the applicant of a denial of the application and states the reasons for that denial. (b) If the application is denied, the chief of police or his designee shall notify the applicant of the denial and state the reasons for the denial. (c) The chief of police or his designee shall deny the application for any of the following reasons: (1) An applicant is under 18 years of age. (2) An applicant has failed to provide information required by this chapter or has falsely answered a question. (3) The premises to be used by the adult business have not been approved as being in compliance with health, fire and building codes. (4) The application or permit fees have not been paid. (5) The business does not have proper zoning. (6) The applicant has a permit under this division which has been suspended or revoked. (d) The applicant shall not be issued a permit if the county's investigation or the information furnished in compliance with this division shows that the applicant has been convicted of a felony or any other crime materially affectin tg he applicant's ability to conduct the permitted activity including a crime involving moral turpitude, or has been denied a permit or has had a permit revoked under any statute or ordinance similar in substance to the provisions of this division;_ . In addition, each application shall be reviewed by the county departments charged with enforcing the business license, zoning, building, plumbing, utility, health, electric and fire prevention codes, as needed, and no permit shall be issued if the 0425:83097.1 ~ ~ ®~ applicant's business in the county does not comply with these and any other applicable county or state laws or regulations. 000 ARTICLE VII. PRECIOUS METAL DEALERS 000 Sec. 15-133. Same--Method of obtaining. (a) The permit required by this article shall be issued by the chief of police upon payment of a $200.00 application fee and satisfaction of the requirements of this article. A permit will not be issued if t n. ^ "~;^^.,' ~ :~° *^ ~^*:~~. *'~^ ^t,:o~ ^~ ..„i:^o ^~ i.:~ ,. ~a i if the applicant has been convicted of a felony or any other crime materially affectin tg he applicant's ability to conduct the permitted activity including a crime of moral turpitude, or if the applicant has been denied a permit or has had a permit revoked under any statute or ordinance similar in substance to the provisions of this article. The applicant shall authorize a background investigation, including a criminal records check. Information required on the application shall include, but not be limited to, the applicant's full name, aliases, address, age, sex, race, social security number, date of birth and fingerprints; the name, address and telephone number of the applicant's employer, if any; and the location of the place of business of the dealer. The applicant shall date and sign the application and certify that the information contained in the application is true and correct. Before a permit is issued, the dealer must have all weighing devices used in his business inspected and approved by local or state weights and measures officials and present written evidence of such approval to the chief of police. (b) No license shall be valid for more than six months from the date of issuance. Any license may be renewed in the same manner as the initial license is obtained. The renewal application fee shall be $200.00. (c) If the dealer does not operate continuously at the same location after the date when he obtains the permit, he shall notify the chief of police when he ceases or renews business or upon change of his location. Failure to operate on weekends or holidays shall not be construed as ceasing or discontinuing operation. The dealer shall conduct his business only from the fixed and permanent location specified in the dealer's application for a permit. 000 ARTICLE VIII. SOLICITORS 000 Sec. 15-162. Issuance of permit; renewal. (a) No person shall enter into or upon a residential premises within the county for the purpose of soliciting, unless he has received a permit from the chief of police. 0425:83097.1 (b) Information required on the solicitor permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) The name, local and permanent addresses, age, date of birth, social security number, race, weight, height, hair and eye color and any other distinguishing characteristics of the applicant, which shall be verified by an automobile operator's license or other photo identification issued by a government agency. (2) The nature or purpose for which solicitations will be made and the nature of the goods, wares, merchandise or services offered for sale. (3) The name and permanent street address of the employer or organization represented. (4) A photograph of the applicant and fingerprints of the applicant. (5) A statement of whether the applicant has been convicted of any felony or misdemeanor and, if so, the nature of the offense, when and where the conviction occurred and the penalty or punishment assessed therefor. (6) The make, model and license number of any vehicle to be used. (7) The specific area or areas of the county where the solicitor will be working. (8) Written authorization to conduct a background investigation of the applicant, including a criminal records check, and to investigate whether the information provided by the applicant is true. (9) Written declaration, dated and signed by the applicant, certifying that the information contained in the application is true and correct. (c) The applicant shall not be issued a permit if a county investigation or the information furnished in compliance with this article shows that the applicant has been convicted of a felony or anv other crime materially affectin tg he applicant's ability to conduct the permitted activity including a crime involving moral turpitude, or had a prior permit revoked under anv statute or ordinance similar in substance to the provisions of this article. , . A permit issued under this article shall be good for 30 days from the date of issuance unless earlier revoked. Every solicitor shall carry his permit with him at all times while engaged in soliciting, and shall display such permit to any person who shall demand to see the permit while he is so engaged. (d) A solicitor's permit which has expired may be renewed for an additional 11-month period, upon the execution of a renewal application setting forth one of the following: (i) a certification that the statements made in the original application are still true and accurate statements at the time the renewal application is filed, or (ii) all changes in the original application required by a change in facts since the date of filing the original 0425:83097.1 ~ ~ ®g~ application. Applications for renewal must be made within 15 days after the expiration of the original permit. Those applications for renewal made after this period shall be considered applications for a new permit. 000 ARTICLE XI. FORTUNE-TELLERS Sec. 15-246. Fortune-tellers. (a) Every person desiring a business license to operate as afortune-teller (as defined in chapter 6) shall first apply for and obtain a permit from the chief of police, or his designee, to conduct such activity. Nothing contained in this section shall apply to a person pretending to act as afortune-teller in aproperly-licensed theater as part of any show or exhibition presented therein or as a part of any play, exhibition, fair or show presented or offered in aid of any benevolent, charitable or educational purpose. (b) The permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Name, alias or nicknames, resident and business address, phone number, place and date of birth, social security number, race, sex, age, height, weight, hair color and eye color. ~EfEa~e-Si~i}@~~ize-E9-crt~~eiiTt~h:ir °~pcrSviri~-airgvvc~rciiliucccr ~(~} Written authorization to conduct a background investigation, including a criminal record check. ~3,)f4} Written declaration, dated and signed by the applicant, certifying that the information contained in the application is true and correct. (c) The chief of police, or his designee, shall conduct an independent investigation and determine whether the statements contained in the r°^~•~~°a ^°~*~~^^*° application are true. The applicant shall also present such ^°~*'~~~ application to the commissioner of the revenue. (d) The applicant shall not be issued a permit if the county's investigation or the information furnished in compliance with this article shows that the applicant has been convicted of a felony or any other crime materially affectin t~pplicant's ability to conduct the permitted activity including a crime involving moral turpitude, or has been denied a permit or has had a permit revoked under any statute or ordinance similar in substance to the provisions of this article, , °~ ~~ ~^* ~~ '-^^a m^~~' ^'~~-^^*°r In addition, each application shall be reviewed by the county departments charged with enforcing the business license, zoning, building, plumbing, utility, health, electric and fire prevention 0425:83097.1 ~ ~ ®1' codes, as needed, and no permit shall be issued if the applicant's business in the county does not comply with these and any other applicable county or state laws or regulations. (e) The chief of police, or his designee, may revoke or suspend any permit issued pursuant to this article (i) for fraud, misrepresentation or any false statements contained in the application; (ii) upon conviction of the applicant for any felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude after the permit is issued; (iii) for failure to comply with the provisions of this article; or (iv) if the applicant's business fails to comply with applicable county or state laws or regulations. (f) If the chief of police, or his designee, revokes a permit, he shall notify the permittee in writing of such action, the reasons for the revocation, and the permittee's right to request a hearing. To receive a hearing, the permittee must make a written hearing request which must be received by the chief of police, or his designee, within ten days of the date of the revocation notice. If a timely hearing request is not received by the chief of police, or his designee, the decision shall be final. If a hearing is properly requested, it shall be held within ten days from receipt of the hearing request. The hearing shall be presided over by the chief of police or his designee. The permittee shall have the right to present evidence and argument or to have counsel do so. Within a reasonable time after the hearing, the chief of police, or his designee, shall render his decision which shall be final. The permittee must discontinue operation of its business when the decision to revoke the permit becomes final. (2) That this ordinances shall become effective immediately upon adoption. (DJ~1~~ 0425:83097.1 ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN:GoodCharacter 2-10, 17 Board of Supervisors dce notice that the Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia, at an ljourned meeting on Februazy 24, 2010, 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting nom at the Chesterfield Administration Wilding, Rt. 10 and Lori Road, hesterfield, Virginia will hold a public gazing where persons may appeaz and esent their views concerning: n ordinance to amend the County of the aunty of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, amending and re-enacting Sections 15- ~, 15-121, 15-122.2, 15-133, 15-162 and -246 relating to the "good chazacter" ~ndazd for certain business permits. copy of the proposed ordinance Wen eat is on file in the County 3ministrator's Office and the Clerk to e Boazd's Office (Room 504) at the Lane Ramsey Administration Building, 9901 ~ti Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, for iblic examination between the hours 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. of each regulaz isiness day. For additional information, ease contact the County Attorney's Office 748-1491. ie hearing is held at a public facili siggned to be accessible to persons wi sabilities. Any persons with questions c e accessibility of the facility or the nee r reasonable accommodations shou ntact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Boar 748-1200. Persons needing interpret rvices for the deaf must notify the Cle: the Boazd no later than Friday, Februa 2010. e ad will run in the Chesterfield Observer .February 10 and Februazy 17, 2010. 1/lOP -1 in. $225.00 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 2/10/2010 & 2/17/2010 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ' ~ day of br~c~~ , 2010. C~ Legal Affiant My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 PUbIIC ` y . ' Vi EA( j'~~' '~ ' ~ !~ tU~•e~Q ~$ O;fr•2 ~ . o EXP1R .,~ : ~p Q ;~ 02-29-2 - ~ ` o11a2093 • - - 1-,.,..,a~P~•w~. rr'`%,. T~ R Y P~,.~``~~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. P.O. Rox 1616. Midlothian, Virginia 231 I3 • Phonc: (80-31545-7500 • Fax: 18(kl) 7a=1-3269 • F.muil: news(a~chester8cldobserver.com • Interact: www.chesterfieldobserveecom ~~ February 24, 2010 Speaker's List Evening Session #1 (Following Presentation of Resolutions) S~-~~ 1. C-l~st~en Whitten 2. tt 3. Robert Wilson 4. Brenda Stewart 5. J Evening Session #2 (End of the Evening Agenda) ~• ~~ ~) ~) ~~ 5 L. J. McCo Marv Frye Pat Campbell Laurie Newill Da~en ~ardr ~~~ Chesterfie/d County Branch NAACP L.J. McCoy, Jr. President 'NAACP Dr. Cheryl Biggins Vice President Demetria Baugh / ~ ' Secretary James Clark Treasurer Rev. L. Pollard Wednesday, February 24, 2010 Chaplin To the honorable Chairman of the Board Mr. Dan Gecker, Vice Chair Mr. James Holland, board members, and County Administrator Mr. lames J. L Stegmaier, my name is L. J. McCoy, Jr., president of the Cheste~eld NAACP. I have lived in this county practically all of my life. While attending elementary schools at Kingsland, then to Bermuda, I completed my education at Carver High School, where I graduated in 1969. All these schools were predominately African American. Throughout this time, 1've seen our county officials evolve from a predominately white male organization to an inclusive diverse administration. Today's administrators reflect an improvement that embraces the general population and paints a masterpiece in county government. But I recently read of Deputy County Administrator M. D. "Pete" Stith,lr. would soon retire. Between the articles and hearing him speak to local groups and organizations, I was amazed of his monumental contributions to the county. The NAACP would like to believe this county will continue its contribution in improving the lives of all of its citizens, specially its minority and low income residents by strongly considering a qualified person of color to assume this position. And, should there be difficulty in fulfilling this task; the Chesterfield County Branch NAACP would consider it an honor to assist in this selection procedure. Thank you. Res u , J. M y, Jr. Branch Presiden 2417 Osborne Rd. Chester, VA 23831 {804) 241-7866 P.O. Box 246 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 804.768 ~9~' O~(Z~ www.chesterfieldnaacp. org Good Evening, Mr. Gecker and Members of the Board of Supervisors: My name is Pat Campbell, and I am primarily speaking on behalf of the Perrymont Family, a group of concerned individuals that strongly believe it IS the community's responsibility to ensure that EVERY student within our county acquires the knowledge, skills and core values necessary to achieve personal success and to enrich our community. I also want to be a voice for ALL CCPS students and their right to obtain the high level of education that is currently provided by our school system. I am here tonight to advocate for our school and ask for your sincere consideration to not accept the elimination of Perrymont as proposed by the School Board. The concept of Perrymont Middle began as an initiative developed by veteran teacher Kathryn Burnes in the late 1980's. In 1992, the program became the Turning Point Academy and achieved status with the VA Dept of Education as an alternative middle school. In 2003, the institution moved to the old Bellwood Elementary building and renamed Perrymont Middle. We ask that you allow us to continue to serve the academically struggling youth, ranging in age from 13-15. Students are referred to Perrymont by their home Principal or Guidance Counselor. Our focus is to remediate and enrich the individual needs of our students, preparing them to move on to high school within one year. Perrymont has made great academic gains. 76% of the students that were tracked have gone on to graduate from high school. It has already been proven that Perrymont students cannot achieve success in a regular classroom of thirty+. Perrymont offers unique opportunities that large middle schools cannot: Educational models for Perrymont are research based. Perrymont Students are successful because: 1) Small classes provide remedial and enrichment instruction based on each student's needs. 2) Uniforms and gender based grouping eliminate distractions. 3) Perrymont has the flexibility to have rotating schedules, change texts, procedures, or strategies to better aid student learning; 5.) Half of Perrymont's students participate with a 21St Century Community Learning Center Grant which provides a comprehensive after-school program for enrichment opportunities, homework assistance, tutoring by Perrymont Teachers, physical activity, and social skills. The Afternoon Program works in partnership with the Chester YMCA, Staff Members from the Chesterfield Mental Health Department, Junior achievement reps, the Police Department, and Communities in Schools. Please tell me what other middle school in Chesterfield is currently providing ALL of these services. Future Perrymont candidates CANNOT be serviced nor will they be successful in their home schools How will closing Perrymont affect our future students? Will they fall through the cracks and become a drop out statistic? According to an article in the Washington Post (copy provided), . Education advocates said Virginia's new accounting reveals important warning signs about students who are not on a path to graduation. . Nearly 60 percent of Virginia dropouts repeated at least one grade. Some of Perrymont's students have repeated 2 grades. . Dropouts were more likely to miss days of school, and many were students learning English as a second language. *Graduation rates are significantly lower in districts with higher percentages of students who are eligible for free or reduced lunches; Currently, 63% of our students participate in the reduced or free lunch program. . females graduate at a higher rate than their male peers 74 percent versus 66 percent; approximately 62 % of Perrymont students are male; *Only about 58 percent of Hispanic students and 53 percent of black students will graduate on time with a regular diploma; Our school population has traditionally ranged from 60 - 75% minorities, mainly African- American and Hispanic. . The lowest-achieving 25 percent of students are twenty times more likely to drop out of school than students in the highest achievement quartile. Some of Perrymont students are reading at 3rd grade level. I assure you, closing Perrymont Middle is NOT the best way to that ensure that EVERY student within our county achieves personal success. Our students are gifted too. They just need a learning environment where they can be successful. What is the solution to this problem? I want to encourage your board to allocate $1 million of the $16 million that you are holding in reserve for CCPS to keep our school alive or make sure the suggested tax rate can support our kids! Perrymont Middle School Testimonials from Staff & Students February 23, 2010 Yesterday the teachers at Perrymont were brought together after school and told that our school will be shut down at the end of this school year due to budget cuts. Throughout today several teachers and a lot of our students have written down their thoughts about that subject. I have gathered those thoughts and compiled them here. Thank you for taking the time to read them. From Judy Clarke, English Teacher at Perrymont 1997 - 2010 It is easy to compare Perrymont Middle School to a lighthouse, a fire truck, or the EMS, because it, like they, has been a lifeline and a means of rescue for countless children for almost 20 years. Our students represent the at-risk, troublesome, and needy who have not found success in a regular school. Perrymont has offered them a second chance, in a very structured and organized environment, small classes, and caring community. It is easy to say that these predominately African-American children will be served in regular middle schools, but the truth is, of course, that large schools are unable to provide the single gender classes, strict enforcement of behavior codes, small community atmosphere, and individual attention that we provide. The backgrounds of our students include homelessness, all kinds of abuse, incarceration, poverty, and neglect, as well as low academic achievement. Our school has produced high school leaders, high school graduates, and college students. By investing in these students at a younger age, we have produced more solid citizens who contribute to society, and fewer dropouts, criminals, and welfare recipients. You are proposing to keep these children at the very places where they have not had their needs met, yet AP classes and the gifted programs continue with only some minor cuts. Once again, the disadvantaged and truly needy are being oppressed. From Melissa Caviness-DeMone, Science Teacher at Perrymont 2006-2007 A few years ago, a 14-year old student threw a toad against our school building, killing it, and couldn't have cared less, saying, "That's what kids do." The following year, after having been taught a more hands-on and worldly approach to science, he insisted on bringing me a live grasshopper. He risked getting in trouble for his persistence. One could only imagine what direction he'd have taken without Perrymont in his life. This year, with so many students going to Community for second semester, it was a great feeling to see the excitement they felt I<nowing they would be with us again next year because we were originally told our school would move to Community HS, not close. They would not have felt this supported had Perrymont not touched them and given them the opportunity to create meaningful relationships with one or more trusted adults. From Cate Pemberton, English Teacher at Perrymont 2006 - 2010 I spent several years teaching in another county before I came to Perrymont. I cannot tell you the difference there is in teaching in a small school with small, gender-based classes of students wearing uniforms. I cannot tell you the difference it makes for our children to be in a smaller school wearing uniforms and sitting in gender-based classes. Fortunately, I am capable of typing the responses we got from our students today when we asked them to think about how Perrymont has helped them become better students. 1 Perrymont has helped me pull my grades up in math because my grade was an F at my other school. Now it's a B. I also participate more in class since there are only a few people. I want Perrymont to stay open so students can get in their right grades. These teachers give the students attention and help them pull their grades up. Even though some of the students can't go to high school at the end of the year, the teachers still try to help. 2 Perrymont has helped me get in my right grade. It gives students more attention from their teachers and is better than other schools. My math teacher Ms. Ashlock has helped me because at first I was struggling in math, but now I'm doing good. 3 First I would like to say thank you for helping me get on the right track because at first I didn't understand most of the other work at my other school, but when I came here, I've learned more work than I ever learned, and I have the Honor Roll now. At first in my other school, I didn't have the Honor Roll, so I think Perrymont is a good school because it helped me very well. That's why I hope other people get the chance to get in their right grades so that they won't drop out of school because they failed too much. Nobody should give up on anything... 4 At Perrymont, the teachers have given me more attention that I needed. The smaller classes help me to keep my grades up. This school is a really good school because it helps kids get back to their right school. Kids need this kind of school because teachers gave us more attention and we make real progress. 5 Perrymont has helped me keep my grades up and not get suspended as much as I used to. 6 Perrymont has helped me achieve greatness. Last year I had all Fs. This year I have As and Bs. They help me and let me understand the work because the classes are much smaller. At other schools, we don't have that opportunity because there are too many students. The student to teacher ratio gives the teachers more time to help us. Ms. Pemberton has helped me succeed in reading, and Ms. Ambrose has helped me a lot with my math. 7 There are many reasons I am happier at Perrymont: better grades, better teachers, and the after school program. The teachers try very hard to get you to pass their classes. Ms. Campbell has not given up on my passing math. Our new principal is making the school even better. 8 Perrymont teachers help us more than at our other schools. They have smaller classes so they can pay more attention to us. I feel better because I can. ask my questions. They keep us out of trouble. They will help us until we can get our answers correct. They help us with clothing and many other things our other schools didn't have. We have an after school program. If we didn't have Perrymont many kids in our county would be failing. 9 PLEASE KEEP PERRYMONT! Please don't take my school. Perrymont has helped me so much. It has given me a chance to catch up to the grade I'm supposed to be in. I think that's really good for kids to have another chance at school. A lot of kids would give up on school if they didn't have this program. It's really embarrassing to be in a lower grade than you're supposed to be in. Also, smaller classes help the teachers and students to pay attention to a smaller group. Being here at Perrymont has taught me to work hard at something that I want and every teacher has pushed me to do my best to reach that goal. I can honestly say if it wasn't for Perrymont, I wouldn't be attending school right now. 10 Perrymont has some great teachers in this school. The teachers help us understand the class more than our home schools. Some teachers would not take a minute out of their time to help us, but the Perrymont teachers will go the extra mile for us. Ms. Campbell made me realize that I can do anything if I put my mind to it. She spends her lunch with me, if I don't understand it. Ms. Nicholas helps me understand science way better than I did at my home school. She taught me science is a way of life; science is everywhere. She is a great teacher. I never did like science up until I came to this school. Now I like science because I understand it better. Ms. Whitehurst and Mrs. Clarke help me write and read like I am supposed to. My reading is better. I like to read now. Writing was my least favorite subject, and now I like it. The rest of the staff is nice. They smile every day and always help if you need it. 11 Perrymont helped me with my grades in all of my classes. Perrymont does a lot of things for me because I couldn't understand what my old teachers were saying while they were teaching class. What I like about Perrymont is the wonderful teachers in the school that will help you with anything you need help with. One of the teachers, Ms. Pemberton helped me with my reading in her class. Ms. Caviness helps me learn more about what is going on in the world. All of the teachers in Perrymont School are trying to help us get in our right grade and be successful in life, too. Please don't shut down Perrymont Middle School. 12 Perrymont has been a big experience to me and the other students to be able to get back in our right grade. If I would have stayed at my home school, I would have felt embarrassed every day for getting held back. All students should have this chance to get back on track. 13 What's made a difference in me coming to Perrymont Middle School My name is ,and I'm originally from Bailey Bridge Middle School. With all the small classes separated by gender, I've learned a lot. I've gotten a chance to have one on one time with the teachers, which is better than being in a class with 30 kids and having either to wait for the teacher for help or not getting any help at all. It used to be hard to understand what we were supposed to be learning. Having ADHD makes it pretty hard for me to go to a regular school and not get any help. Perrymont Middle School has definitely shown me that I can do it, and that I am smart. Perrymont Middle has made me change my thoughts about having an education. I came from a regular school having Cs, Ds, and Fs. Now I have As, Bs, and Cs. Here we don't start one topic today and move to another one tomorrow. We actually focus on one topic. I don't feel as stressed as I did going to a regular school. For me going to a regular school made stressed because I had to worry about all the homework that I had to do in one night and not being able to understand what has been given to me because I've never had a chance to get help or have one on one with my teachers, but at Perrymont Middle School we get all the help we need. You may walk into Perrymont thinking negative things, but if you come here every day you would see how hard we work and how dedicated the teachers and faculty are. In my opinion I think you should definitely keep the school open. 14 Perrymont has helped me by my grades coming up and putting me in my right grade. Perrymont provides help from others and can help us with anything we need help with. I like the staff and the separate rooms so I can focus. Ms. Ashlock helps me in math because I was struggling at my old school. Ms. Pemberton helps me with my reading skills. 15 Perrymont has helped me because they helped me improve in my grades, and they are helping to get to my right grade. At my old school I could not understand the teacher because there were too many students, and they interrupted the teacher. Here at Perrymont the teachers are nice, and they help me understand things clearly and the classes are small, and you learn more. What I like about Perrymont is the small classes, the nice teachers, the way they help us understand things, and the way they separate us boys from girls. Ms. Ashlock helped me improve in math because at my old school I barely passed with a D. I did not understand the concepts in math. Ms. Ashlock explains it more clearly so I can understand it. 16 Perrymont gave me a back bone. There's more money spent on me because I have smaller class sizes. These things have helped me raise my grades. 17 Perrymont is very different from all schools. Perrymont gives us another chance to get good grades. Ms. Campbell has high expectations, but in the long run, she is helping me get into my right grade. Perrymont has a great staff. I call Ms. Nicholas "Mom". She will listen to anything. Perrymont is a great school for people to learn more and to turn our lives around from going down. If you thought you would never make good grades, well you have never been to Perrymont. This school will helps you get As and Bs. 18 Perrymont has helped me by teaching me to be responsible for my actions. It will help me get into my right grade, unlike my other school. What I like about Perrymont is that the teachers really help me with my work. When I get in trouble, the principal really listens to both sides of the story. My teachers, Ms. Pemberton and Ms. Whitehurst, have made a big difference because I used to get Ds in English, and now I have As. They really break down problems with us, so we can get it. 19 The things about Perrymont that have helped me most are the teachers. The teachers are great because they help everybody succeed in their work. Perrymont helps people that get behind to get caught back up. They help to put the people that need to catch up in the right grade they're supposed to be in. They have helped me a lot over the past two years. Perrymont has really helped me catch back up. 20 ~Perrymont has smaller classes that have helped me do better and get better grades. I also like how short the classes are. My teachers helped me make better choices. 21 Perrymont has changed me because the teachers work with me more and explain the work. In my other school I had Ds and Fs. Since I came to Perrymont, I made the Honor Roll. The classes are smaller which gives us students a better chance to focus and not worrying about 20 other kids in class. Perrymont teachers are devoted to their work. There serious about what they do. 22 Hello, my name is I am 13 years old, and I go to Perrymont Middle School. If I could say Perrymont Middle is a great place. I used to make Ds and Fs, but now I make As and Bs. I have really benefitted from this school. I used to want to drop out, but now I know I can be somebody. I used to think school was a myth and it wouldn't help me in the long run, but now I know different. I can grow up and be a veterinarian. Let me cut to the chase, Perrymont Middle should not close down. We have smaller classes; there's more individual help; and they teach you a lot more. 23 Perrymont has helped me bring my grades up a lot. I can focus more with smaller classes. It is become a place where the people here care about the students a lot. I brought up my math grades a lot. At first I had Fs, but now I have a good grade. Please keep Perrymont. 24 Perrymont has helped me with grades, habits, and getting through to my right grade. Perrymont has helped a lot of kids who are supposed to be in high school get Zhere at the second semester. f Before coming to Perrymont I was in another Chesterfield County Public School. I mostly had Ds and Fs. Ever since I came to Perrymont, all of my grades have been higher. I have had more time to understand things in math, especially. One of the best things about Perrymont is their physical fitness program. Perrymont has gym every day and that helps all students stay in shape. I used to have a lot of bad habits that aren't really supposed to be done, but ever since I heard about the privileges offered to me at Perrymont, I've broken almost all of them. 25 Perrymont has done wonders for me because I am passing! ! ! I've gotten another chance to do good, and get caught up in my right grade. Perrymont can help kids so much with getting in their right grade. I failed twice, and I never thought I'd get caught up, but Perrymont made it possible for me. 26 Perrymont helped me a lot in reading and science because at first my reading and science were very low grades, but now I have a B or C in both classes. Perrymont teachers take the time with students. They don't move on to another subject without the students knowing it. Also, when you are absent, they give you time to make up your work. What I like about Perrymont is the teachers don't put you down. They encourage you, and tell you that you're going to make it. Ms. Ashlock was really hard on me, but she's made a big difference in my life. Now I come to school with no problems and do my work. I have not gotten in trouble since last year just because of Ms. Ashlock. 27 The teaching at Perrymont is different. If they teach 3 different things, everything is on the test. We're still tested on stuff from September. 28 Perrymont has allowed me to catch up my education. In my old school I would have just had to repeat a grade. 29 Perrymont helps me get my grades up and pass to high school. Even though I don't like to wear a uniform or be in (gender) separate classes, they still help you. 30 Perrymont is a good school to get caught up. Getting As and Bs makes me feel good. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS __ AGENDA ,~, Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: February 24, 2010 Item Number: 20. Subject: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on March 8, 2010 with dinner at 5:00 p.m. in Room 502 and budget presentations to follow at 6:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No # O~p1~3