Loading...
02-27-91 MinutesMr. M. M. Sullivan~ Chairman Mr. C.F. Cuttle, Jr., Vice Chrmn. Mr. G. H. Apple~ate Mr. Jesse J. Mayes County Administrator Harry S. Daniel Staff in Attex~lance: Mr. N. E. Carmichaelt MS. ~¥ Davis, Exec. Asst. to Ce. Aden. Mrs. Dori~ DuHurt, Lsgis. ~vcs. and Mr. William Diggs, Ms. Jean S. Delezal, Clerk to the Moard Chief Robert Eanes, Jr. Deputy Co. Admin., Mr. William H. Howell, Dir., Plannin~ Dept. Mental Health/Retard. ~s. Nary Leu Lyle, Dir., Accounting Dept. ~. Robert L. Masden, Deputy Co. A~in., ~- R. J. McCracken, Tranmp. Director Mr. Rich=rd Mc~l~i~h, Dir., Env, En~ Dept. ~r. Steve L. ~cas, Co. Attorney Mrs. Pauline Mit=hell, Dir., N~WS & P~lic Infu. Services Mr. Richard N~nally~ Rxtunslon Agent Col. J. R. Pit,an, Jr. chief o~ Police Chief~ Dev. Review, ~Ia~ing Dep~r~ent Mr. Riohard S~l~, D~p~=y Co. A~in,, Development M~. Jean smith, Dir., Mr. J.L. St~aier, Dir., Parks & Rec. Mr. David welohon~, Dir. o~ Utilities sheriff C. G. Willies, lh~riff's Depar~ent ~. Frederick Willis, Dir. of H~an Resource ~nagament 91-113 2/27/91 Mr. Sullivan called the zegularly sehedule~ meeting to order at 9:00 a.~, IEST) in the Chesterfield County Boaxd Room. He Stated all were saddened by the recent death of Mr. Daaiel's se~, Grady; noted the Board wo~ld Bo attendiag the funeral services Later in the day; end that he f~tt it appropriate to dedicate today'~ meeting in r~meJ~branoe Q~ this young man. 1. INVOCATION Mr. S~lliv=n introduced ~. Nil~ard D. "~ete'r stith, Director of ~arkz and R~orea~ien, who gave the invocation. 2. P~D~E OF Ar,T,R~IANC~ TO ~ i~LAG OF T~ ~'~'£~ K~A~ OF Mr. Ra~sey led the Pledge cf Allegiance to United States of Amerima. the F/ag Mr. Sullivan askgd =hat these pr~aent also share a moment of silent prayer in memory of she~i£f Clarence Williams' mother, who recently passed away. On motion of xr. curtis, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Boa=~ approved the minutes cf February t3, 19~1, as a~ended. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, ~z. Currin, Mr. Applegate an~ Mr, Mayes. Absent: ~r. Daniel. Mr, ~asde~ a~ated the Chesterfield County Nursing Home recently received full a¢Greditatio~ by the Joint co~mmis$ion on Accreditation Of Health Care Or~a~lizations; oullined the criteria by which th~ facility achieved its aec0r~Plishment; and presented the ac~reditation pla~e to M~. Jacob W. ~ast, Director cf the ~=rslng Home, ~d rec~Gnlz~d m~r~ of the Nursing ~om~ staff who were p~e~unt. Mr. R~sey stated the Bud~=t and Audit C~ittee met with opinions tha~ ~he financial stat~ents weEe fairly stated Co~i~tee ~ince its inception and ~!t i= co~nd~le for its outstanding e~urts ~d achievements. ~z. R~sey stated Chesterfield Co~ty receive~, for seventh con~ec~tiv~ year, a Disti~ished Budget Presentation Award from the Gover~ent Finance Officers Assuclation of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its ~sual budget an~ co. ended staff their achievement. Mr. MaFos roper%ed he attended the Education Advisory CoK~ittee to the Council on Information Management. Mr. Applegate r~ported h~ attended ~hs Ca~ital Region Airport Commission (CRAC) meeting, at which it was ne=ed that there ha~ been a recent decline in passe.get e~plan~ents, ~ at 91-114 2/27/91 which iT was announced that American Airlines h&s begun jet service from Richmond tO Nashville, Tennessee. Mr. Curri~ ~epo~ted he attended the Captial Region Airport Commission (CRAC) meeting; the Sehoul Liaison Committee with Mr. Sullivan, at which there was much discussion relative to short-term and long-terM budget issues. Hr. Sull±va-~ reported h~ attended several meetings relative to Economic Development prospects which he hoped would eo~e to fruition in the future~ and the initial meetin~ of a grou~ concerned with the establishment of a Regional Water A=thority which would primarily involve elected officials and County Administrators/City Manaqers. On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board de~erred until Marsh 27, 1991, Item ll.A., Appropriation of Funds for Fea~ibility Study and Schematic Design Doc%tmsnts for the Henricus Historical Park Visiter center~ deferred from 2:00 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. Item 11.K., Requests for Mobile Home ~ermi~a and Rezoning as the B~ard would be attending £un~ral ~erviees; deleted Item 11.J. Lunch at 12~00 P.m. wi~h members of the M~tropolitan Ricb/~ond Convention and Visitors Bureau at the Holiday tnn-Keger Center: added Item ll.F.~., Request for Bingo-Raffle Permit; de~erred until March 13, 1991, Adoption cf Resolution Requesting tho5 the Revenue Resources and Infrastructure Committe~ Consider a Refere~d~ tO Approve a Charter ~nendme~ Permittin~ the Im~usitien of Impact Fees and Item 9.C., Adoptio~ of a Resolution Requesting that tho Referendu~ to Approve a Charter Amendment Pez~i~ting the Imposition of a ~eala Ta~, as it was felt that Mr~ Daniel Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin, Mr. Applegate a~d Nz. Ma~es. ~osent: Fir. Daniel. 7.A. ~G~ ~B~T ~, ~LI~ D~ adopted the ~oll~in~ re~ulu~ion: ~ield Co~ty Police Depar~nt on January 1, 1991; and WHEREAS, Serge~t Doyle has provide~ twenty-six ~EREAS, Serg~t Doyle has served the Co~ty in the whore he developed his ~ilitie~ in Patrol Tec~i~e~, Accident Investigation a~d Cr~inal Investiga~ion; and ~, S~rgeant ~Mt=, along with other m~ers O~ the Police Depar~ent, was i~volved in the initial ~o~atioR the ~uccessful Crime Solver's Progr~; ~, ~ergean= D~yle ha8 provided the Chestur~iuld County Police Depa=~ent with m~y y~rs of loyal ~AS, Chesterfield County and the Board of will miss SeEGeant hoyle's dilige~ s~rvice. 91-115 2/27/91 NOW, T~BR~FORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chester~isld Count~ Board O~ Supervisors publicly recognizes Sergeant Robert Doyle and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County their appreciation for his AArD, BE IT FURT~f~R RESOLVED, that a copy o~ this resolution be presented to Serg~t Doyle and that thi~ res01uti~n be pe~anentl~ recorded ~o~ the papers of thi~ Board o~ Supervisors ~f Chesterfield County. A~es: ~. Sullivan, ~r. Currin, ~. Apple~at~ and Mr. ~aye~. ~sent; ~. Daniel. Mr. Sullivan presented the ex~cuted resolution and Jef~u~8~n Cup to s~zgeant Doyle in recogninion of his servio~ to the citizens of the CouRt~ and wished him well in his r~tircmunt. 7.B. ~. ~RBARAV. TUNST-~LL, OFFICE OF 'r~CC~{I~IONER~F On motion of Mr. A~pl~gate, seconde~ by ~. ~yes, the Board a~opted the fulluwi~g r~molution: ~E~S, MZM. Barbara V, Tunmtall will retire from the Office of the co~ismio~er of Revenue, Chester~iel~ CQ=~y, ~ality s~rvice to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and ~A$, Chemterfimld County ~d the Board of Supervisors will miss ~m. ~nstall~a diligent ~viG~; and ~s~S, Mrs. T~stall has, throughou~ h~z m~ years m~rvice, been a v=lued ~ployee, providing the citizens Chesterfield Co~tF assistance with state inc~e, business lio~ns~ and psrsonal 9ru~rt~ t~; ~, Mrs. ~n~a11'$ kin~ess, compassion and willinqn$$m to o~fur hcZ seEvices has been appreciated ta~ayer~ and ~loy~es alike. N~, ~FO~ ~E IT ~SOL~, ~hat the Chesterfield County Board of supervisors p~ticly reco~izea Mrs. Barbara V. ~nstall and e~ten~s on behalf of its m~z~ and oi~iz~$ of Chesterfield cowry their uppreciatiO~ for her Eervice to the count~. ~D, BE IT F~ ~SOL~D, that a co~y resolution be presen=sd =e Mrs. resolution be permanently recorded Boar~ o~ Supervisors c~ Chesterfield Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. CefTin, Mr. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr. Sullivan presented th~ executed Cup to Ms. Tunstall in recognitien citizens of the County and wished her T~nstall and that among the papers of County, Virginia. ~his this this ADDlegata and Mr. Mayes. resoluti0~ and Jefferson of her service to the well in her retirement. 7.C. MS. JOYCB s- QU~t.~ DEPARtmENT OF ~OCIAL SERS~I~F.g On motion of Mr. CurTis, ~eco~d~d ~y Mr. Mayes~ =he Board ~E~S, Hrs. Joyce S. Quaiff will r~tire from the Depar~ent of Social Services on March 1, 1991; and 91-116 2/27/91 W~EREAS, Mrs. Quaiff has provided OVer forty years of dedicated and cluality service to the citizens o~ Chesterfield County, of which ~everal yeora were served with The chesterfield County Public School System and thirty-~even y~ars with the Department of Social Services; and WHEREAS, 51rs. Quaiff has served in voices administrative capacities within the Department of social services through part-time and ~ull-time po~itionE, and most :~o~n=ly as chief of A~inistrative Services, managing the daily operations o! twenty-two a~inistrativ~ support perso~ei; and ~aZAS, ~s. Quaiff's knowledge of complex p~lic welfare bud~eta~ and ~inancial matters has benefitted the Depar~ent an~ County through ~ficlent and ~ffe~tive utilization of financial resources; ~d ~EREAS, ~s. Quai~f h~s d~onshrated th~ highest degree of responsibility ~d dedication to her job, to the goals o~ the Social Services Deponent and County, and ~o the provision o~ ~e~ices to the Depar~ent'~ recipients. NOW, TH~FO~ BE IT RESOL~D~ that th~ chesterfield Quai~ and e~resses on behal~ of its m~er~ ~d the citizens the County ~d extends best wishes in hem xetiMement. ~D, BE IT F~ ~SOLV~, that a copy of this resolution b~ presented ~o Mrs. ~ai~ an~ that thi~ r~solution be pendently recorded ~ong the papers of the Ayes: ~. Sullivan, Mr. Currin, ~. Applegate ~d ~. ~ayes. ~ent: ~r. Daniel. ~r. Sullivan presented the executed resol=tion to ME. Quaiff in r~cogni=ion of her service to the County, wished her wuli in her r~tirement a~ recognized Mr. ~ai~f, who was also 8. ~%~TNSS OF CITIZ~{S f~ URS~JL~) ~A'r~ ~ CLAI~5 0 ~. ~'~ M. ~ ~GAk~Di~G I~ACT FKKK AND FINANCES OF Ms. Terry M. Fink outli~ed ~ variety O~ volunteer programs in which parents have participated to assist with the doily operations of schools; veiced support for a tax increase, if such £un~s were nut made available through impact ~ees, to provided the revenues necessary ~or the school system to ~ontinue th~ quality of education to which the students of the County are accustomed: ~tated she felt the educe=ion of the County's children was a major priority; and u~ged that the as a means of ensurinq financial well-being of chesterfield ~r. Sullivan indicated this ~oard hod twice voted unanimously ~or impact fees, however, the authorization of impact fees could onl~ be provided hy the General Assembly which has not seen fit to do so thus far. Ne stated, i~se~ar as this Board is concerned, lobbying efforts would continue for impact fees for the County. ~r. Mayas addressed the volunteer efforts of the parents in prcvidi~q eemputer~ and software, etc., to the school~; no,ed that in order to provide computer ~raining, consideration ~eeds tc be given to th~ sstabliEtunent cf classified positions in various in~titu~icns to ensure that sa~e are utilized properly and effectively; and asked that, 91-117 2/27/91 for cuntin=ity of this use, their organization consider th~ fact thaf no classified positions are available in tho State to ensura this su~ort. 9.A. APPRO%'AL OF PURCHASE oF LAND FO~{ 'J.'Z~LG Mr. Stith presented a brief summ~ary of thc I~quest for approval of the purchas~ o~ land for the Clover ~ill Athletic 23, 1991 meeting to address concerns raised by Mr. Applu~ate; stated the development of the complex would b~ phased and ~olnted out that the demand for such facilities has increased S~bstantially in recent years and oxisUing facilities are Mr. Applegate incfuired if anyone had attempted disloO~ with the pgoperty owner o~ = smaller ~aroel adjacent to the the state it is; noted the total expenditure for this purchase do~s not allow for =he complete development of said project; stated he would like the opportunity tO mee~ with the a~jacmnt property owner to discuss the matter while the County tho issue be de~erred until March 13, L991 so that he may further evaluate ~hu situation. deferred until March 13, 199I, a request for tho purchase of land £or tbs Clover Mil1 Arb!eric Complex. Aye$~ Kr. Sullivan, Mr. Currin, MT. ADplegete and Mr, Mayas. 10.A. ~o CONSIDER AN A~END~fl~TO ~ ~91 BUD~B¥ APP~O~RIATIN~ $750,000 ~ ~ CIT~ OF P~IC~MOND FOO THERENOVATI~NANDAE~ITION OF BONAI~ LIB~ Mr. Harm~er stated thi~ date and tim~ had been advertised for a public hearing tO oon~ider an a~cn~m~nt to the EY-91 budget by a~prepriatin~ $750,000 from th~ City c~ Ricb~ond for the renovatio~ a~d addition cf the ~on Air Library. stated he felt effort~ toward r~qionat cooperation should ~ Mr. R~sey clarified that the =ctual ~o~t of thi$ project ia $760,000 but the ~ount advertised wa~ $75Q~OO and th~ Board could appropriate only the $750,00Q as adv~r=ised; however, the $10,00O ~iff=rence =cold be apDroDriat~ a~inistratively under the authority provided the County A~inistlator by the 0U ~otlun of ~r. su~]iva~, seconded by Mr. Coffin, the Board appropriated $750,000 from th~ City of Ric~ond, with ~ cover project costs, for a total of $760,000 for the renova~ion and addition to the Ben Air Library~ and awarde~ a construction contrac~ to Viking Em:erDriseS, Inc. i~ the ~O=at of $~,043,000 {the source of these iunds beinq 198S 91-11~ 2/27/91 Bon~ Referendum Fun~s and contributions from the City of Richmond. ) Ayes: ~r. Sullivan, Mr. Currin, F~r. Applegate and Mr. Mayes. Absent: Mr. Daaiel. 10.B. TO C~NS~ ~ ~ ~0 ~ ~91 BUDGET BX APPROPRiATIN~ $1zBO~rB00 IN BOND ~ FO~ 'r~ ADDITION AND ~%~ATION O~ Tn~ MENTAL H~J%L~/)~FTAL ~TARDATION Mr. Hammer stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing =o consider an amendment to the FY-91 budget by appropriating $1~S~6~800 in bond funds for the addition and N~ one o~me forward to s~eak in favor of or against the matter. Ther~ wa~ Board di~o~sion rolativ~ to the ~wardinq of said contract to Ken,ridge Constructlcn Company of Kenbridge, VA until a separat~ .matter involving the conmtruction of aDother County building by the same contractor had ba~n resolved; defgrrat cn ~e appropriation/coat,act ~w~r~ for the p~opo~d renovation/addition project for the Mental Health/Mental project~ de~errat o~ the matter for two weeks versus thirty On motion Of Mr. Currin, se¢0nd~d ~y Mr. Ma~es, th~ Boar~ d~ferred until March 13, 1991, consideration of an up~rcpriation o~ $1,M0~,SQ0 in bond ~unds for the addition and renovation of the Mental Health/Mental Retardation Building and the award of construction contract to Ker~bridge Construction Company of Kenbridge, VA f~r sam~. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Cumrin, ~ir. Applegate and Mr. ~ayes. Absent; ~r. Daniel. 10.C. ~O CONSIDE~ AN ~ TO I~HEASE '.e:,~:~.~,. 1990-91%~I~/LI- TIE~ CAPITAL Bl~X~TBY $1r313r40U FOR~ ~ Mr. Sale s~a%ed this da=e and ~imm had b~en advsrtised for a public hearing to consider an amendment to increase the 1990-91 Utilities capital 5edger by $1,313,400 for the Bermuda ~undrcd Induutrial Wastewutur System. ~r. Currin stated that when this mat%er was previously before hearing date to consider an ~/nend~ent to increase the 1990-91 Utilities Capital Budget By $1,313,4QQ for the Bermuda Hundred Industrial W~stewater System and a corf~llct of interest did not exist. Mowever, he stated~ at this time, he wished to benefit by the D~oposed project, declared a conflict of intsrsst pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict o~ Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. Mr. Seorqe Beadles voiced support for the proposed project ~rovide~ industrial users were not pert~itted to ~ave pre-treatment programs and stated hm felt there should be more citizen involvement in discussions pertainiu~ to county Board amended the 1990-91 Utilities Capital B~dget to add the 91-t19 2127/91 appropriated $1,3L3~400 ~rom develcper contributions to cover engi~eerlng a~d construction costs ~0~ same. (it i~ noted this project is not a development or assessment district, and all Capital expenditu£e~ wi!l come from monies deposited with the Depaxt~ment of Utilities in advance by participating deposit the balance of the project cost prior a construction contract.) Ayes: Mr. Sulliv~/%, Mr. ApDIegate an~ ~r. Mayer. ~ent: ~r. C~rrin and Mr. TO ~¥~TUER '~u~ ~RO~O~ CJ~%N~NC OF A P~RMIT F~R 1'~ OP~TON OF N(~-~ENCY ~EDICAL TRANSPOP~TATI(~ TO ATLANTIC A~BULANCE SERVICE P~RSU~T TO S~CTTON 3~1 u~ THE CODK o~CHESTEP~i Mr. ~ica~ stated this dat~ and time h~d been advertised ~or a publiQ hearing to consider the proposed granting oia permit ~or the operatlo~ of naa-emergency medical transportation to have no objection to ~e opera=ion provided there emergency medical transport of patients in the was generally a~reed to recess for five (~1 minutes. Mr. James ~ubb=rd, representing the applicant, was present to answer questions. No cnn came forward ~O speak in favor of or against ~he matter. W~en asked, ~r. Elwood Miller indicaUed he was in %he pronsss c~ o~taining all other necessary permits. On ~otion of ~r, Appl~gate, seconded by ~Lr. 0urrin, the ~card granted a special ambulance permit pursuant to Section 3-1 o£ the code of the County of Chesterfield, 197S, as a~ended, to Atlantic A~bulance Service to provide non-emergency medical transportation for home-bound and institutionalized patientm requizin~ ~reatment u~ transfer ts another medloal ~a¢ili~ within the County. Ayes: Mr. Snllivan, Mr. CozilY, ~I, Applegate ~d Mr. ~ayes. Absent: Nr- Daniel. 11. ~5~ B~SIN~SS ll-B- ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUT~OP~IZING I'~ ISS~ANC~ OF $9r%55.,000 1N GI~.AL OBLIGATION B~DS FOR OOUNTY Discussion, ~estiona and ~o~ents ensued relativ~ to the whether or not it was advis~l~ ox in the best inter~st uf the CQunty ~o authorize and p~ovid~ at this time for the issuance, sale and delivery of said general obligation bonds in tbs ~ount of $9,455,060 for County capital ~provements; when the projects) to be paid for with this iss~nG~; the exlzting b~d ~en amked, M~. ~io~s indicated ~at if approvml Of this ~eneral obligation bond issuance funds a Coun~y ~ia~saction 2/27/9~ that would affect a Board member's ~inan=ial interest, then a ~onflict Of inte~uut would exist. Mr. Currin disclosed to the his financial interests, declared a conflict of interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. that he owns interest in another site, located within close proximity to the subject property, that was under adopted the following resolution: ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF NINE MIL~IO~ Y0~R FIFi~-FIF~ T~O~A~ DOLLAR~ ($9,455,~00) PPJNCIpAL OF PUBLIC I MPROVE)~T BONDS OF 'rn~ CODNT~ C~EOT~d~/RT~, I~RGINIA, FOR VA~O~ i~[~BI~C PROJECTS AND FRO~IDING WIT~ ~ES1;EC~ TO xu~ ISSUANCE AND SALE OF AN ~ P~INCIPAL A~0UNT OF PUBLIC BO~D A~TTCIPATION NOTES IN ANTICIPATION OF TH~ IS~JANC~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, vIKG~NIA: $~CTIO~ 1. ~indinqe and D~e~nir~ltion~. Pursuant to Chapter 5 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia, 19~0 (the ~a~e being ~e ~ubli= Finance Act), un election Chesterfield, Virginia (=h~ "county"), on November ~, 1988 and an Order of the Circuit Court of the County dated December i988, the County ia author~ze~, inter alia, to contract debt of one hundred sixty-fi~e million eight hundred thousand dollars ($165,888,000) f~r the following purposes: {i} General obligation bonds in the maximum amount dollar~ ($135,900,O0Q) to provide, capital school improve- ment projects in the County; [ii) General obligation bonds in the maximum amount of eleven million six hundred thuu~an~ dollars ($11,600~080} t~ provide public safety improvement proje~ns in the County, including a fire s~atien and pelion and fire training academy and related administra- tive £acili~ie~; G~neral Obligation bon~e in the maximum amount of five million three hundred theasand dollars ($5,580,000) to provide park ~nd recreation improvement projects in th~ County; (iv) General obligation bunds in t. he maximum amount of seven million on~ hundred thousand dollars ($7,100,000) to provide library improvement projeo=s in (v) General obligation bonds in the ~imum amount ($5,900,000) %O provide mental hualth a~d me~=l retarda- tion improvement projects in the County. ' 91-121 2/27/91 Ih) As of the date hereof, eighty-five million six hundred twenty-five thousand dollar~ ($85,625,000) principal amount of zuch general obligation bonds authorized by the November 8, 1988 have heretofore been issued by the County the Boaxd of SuDe=vi~0ra on December 14, 1988, ae amended on september ~6, 1990, October 11, 1989, January 24, 1990, as amended on September 26, 1990, and October 24, 1990, ~or the fallowing ~urposes: {i) Sixty-five million one hundrsd eighty thousand dollars ($65,150,000} for capital school improvement projects in the County issued pursuant resolutions authorizing such issuance adopted by the ~oard of Super- vi~or~ on December 14, 1988, as amended on september 26, 1990, October 11, 1989, and January 24, 1~90, as amended on September 26, 199U; (ii] Six million five hundred twenty-one thousand dollars ($~,521,080) for ~ubllc safety improvement projects i~ th~ County issued ptt~suant to Iesol~tion~ authorizing such issuance adopted by the Board of Super- visors o~ December 14, 1988, as amended on September ~6, 1990, and October 24, 1990: (iii) Five million three hUndred thousand dollars ($5,~00,00~) for park and recreation improvement projects in the County issued pursuant resolutions authorizing such i~suanae a~opted ~y the Baar~ of ~uper- 1990, January 24, 1990, as ~mended on September 26, 1990, and October 24, 1990; (iv) Four million four hundred forty-four thousand d01!ar~ ($4,444,000) for library improvsmen= projects in the County issued pursuant resolutions authorizing s~ch 1~, 1988, as amended on September ~6, 1990, and October 24, 1990; and (v) Four million one hundred eighty thous~%d dollars ($4,180,000) ior mental health and mental retarda- tion i~Provement projects in the County issued pttrsnant to a resolution aut-horizin~ such issuance a~e~te~ by September 26, 1990, an~ October 24, 1990. (c) The Board of Superviso=s dssm~ i= advisable and in the best interests of th~ County to authorize and provide at this time ~cr the issuance, sale and ~elivery of nine million four hundred fifty-five thousand dollars ($9,455,000) a~gregate principal amount of the gonerat obligation bonds authorized ~or issuance by the voters o~ th~ County a= aforementioned election called and held in the County on November 8, 1~85 for tho following purposes: (i) five million seventy-nine thousan~ dollars ($5,079,000) to preside public safety ~mprovement pro- jects in the County; (ii) =we mild±on si~ hundred fifty-six thousand della=s ($2,656,0QU) to provide library improvement projects ~n the County; and (ill} one ~illion seven hundred twenty dollars ($1,720,0Q0) to provide mental health and mental retardation improvement projects i~ the County. SECTION 2. Authorization oi Bonds. For the purpose Qf financing the ou~t~ of the public i~Drovement projects in 91 122 2/27191 the county, as authorized by the voters ef the county at the ~le~ti~n held in the County on November 8, 195~ and as described in Section l(c) here~, there are hereby ~uth~rized hundred fifty-five tbousar~5 dollars ($9,455~000} principal designated and known a~ "Public Improvement Bo~d~~' {herei~- after referred to as the "~onds"). The ~onds shall be issued and sold in their entirety ut eric time, or from tim= to tim~ in part in series, as shall be determined by ~he County Administrator of the County. The Bonds may be sold at the same time as other general o~liga=icn bonds ars a~ld by the County. The Bonds shall bear interest at such rate or rates Der annum as shall be specified in the bid accepted hy sub~ purchase of the Bonds of such series, if any bid therefor be accepted. The County Administrator is authorized to determine, in accordance with and ~ubject to the provisions of this resolution: whether the Bonds of any series shall be in ~ully-registersd or heck-entr~ ~erm; the denemination or ~encminatiuns u~ ~hc Bonds; ~he methud o~ numbering the ~onds; the date or d~tes of the Bends; the interest payment dates thereof; the resord dates for the payment of intersst thereon; the maturity dates thereof; the amount of principal maturing on each maturity date; the place or places of payment theresf and ~he paying agent or paying agents therefor; the place er places of registTatlon, exchange or transfer and the registrar therefor; ~nd whether or not the Do.ds shall be subject to redemption prior to their stated maturity or maturities and if sub3ect to such redemption, the premium, if any, payable upon such redemption and fha respective pericds in which such premiums ar~ payable. Bonds~ Bo~ks of Registry; Exchanges and Transfers cf Bonds. Ia) A~ointment of Registrar. Subject to the approval of the Board of Supervisors ~y subsequent resole=ion adopted on the dat~ of ~&l~ of the Bonds, the County Adminis- trator is here~y autherlse~ to select, ~or each s~ries of Bonds, the registrar for the Bonds o~ such series (hereinafter referred to as the "Registrar"), which Registrar ~ay he the County Treasurer. (hi ~ayment of Bonds. (il At any time during which the Bends sf any series shall he in fully registered form, the iatereat on the Bonds of such series shall ~s pa~able by check or draft mailed b~ the Registrar to the registered owners of the ~onds of such series at their addresses as the mama appear on the hooks of registry as cf the record date for the pa~men~ of interest on the Bunds cf such series, and the principal of and premium, if any, on the Registrar. (ii) At any time during which the Bon~s of any seri~s shall he in hook-entry form, the Drin0ipal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds of such series shall he payable in accordance with the arrangement~ made with (iii) The principal cf a~d prsmium, if any, and interest 0~ the Bolds shall be ~ayuble in such coi~ or currency of the United S%ates cf America as at the respective date~ of payment is legal tende~ for public and private debts. Bonds. (i) At all times during which any Bond remains out,tending and unpaid, the Registrar shall keep er ca, se to be kept at its ~rinci~al office, b~cks of registry for the 91-123 2/27/91 presentation at the principal office of the Registrar for such purpose, the Registrar, under s~ch reassemble regulations as it may prescribe, shall register, exchange, transfer, er cause to be registered, exchanged or transferred~ on the becks of registry the Ban~a as herein set forth; provided, howuVe~, that the Registrar shall not be required to dO 80 with :espeet to any Bond after the close of busines~ on the forty-fifth (4B=h] day next preceding anF date fixed for the redemption of such Bond or any portio~ thereof. (ii) Any Bond may be exchanged at the principal office of t~e Registrar for a like aggre~atu ~ri~cipal amoun~ interest rate and maturity. Iiii) Any Bond may, i~ accordmnce with its terr~s, ~e transferred upon the books of reglstz~z by ~he person in whose name it is reNistsred, in permon or by his duly authorized agent, upon surrender of such Bend to th~ ~o~istrar for cancellation, accompanied k~f a written instrument of transfer duly executed by the registered owner in person er his duly authorized agent, in ~orm satlsiactory to the Registrar. (iv) All %rans£ers or exchanges pursuant tO this Section 3(o) shall be made withou= expense to uhe registered owner e9 such Bonds, ~xcept as otherwise herein provided~ and ~×eept that the R~istrar shall require payment b~ the registered owner of the ~o~ requestin~ such transfer or exchange of any t~x or other governmental charges required ~o be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (v) Alt Bonds surrsndesed pursuant to this Section SECTION 4. Redemption of Bonds. (a) Provisio~s for Redemption. subject to the approval of the Board of supervisors by subsequea~ resolution adopted on the da~e of sale of the B0ndm, the Co%nty Adminis- trator ~ball determine the previsions Esr the rsdemption of the Bonds. Ih) Notice of aedempbio~. ~otioe of any s~ch redemptloa shall be mailed not less than thirt~ (~0) days prior fo the date fired for redemption ~y firs: ~lass mail, redeemed at ~uch regis~srsd owner's address as shown on the ~ooks of registl-f. Such notice ~hall specify the date, number~ and maturities of tb~ Bonds to be redeemed, th~ date and place fixed for their redemption and the pzomith~, if any~ payable upon such redemption, and if l~ss than the entire must be surrenduz~d i~ e~change ~or the principal a~o~t thereof to ha redeemed and the issuance of a new Bend ~qualling in principal amount that portion of the principal amoun~ thereof not redeemed, a~d shall also skate that upon payable upon each Bond called for rede~ptio~ the principal amou_qt to be redeemed together with tbs applicable redemption ~r~mium, if any, and the interest accrued on such principal amount to the date iixed for redsmption, and that from and after such date interest on such principal amount shall cease to accrue. tion of ~m¥ Bond shall have been given as hereinabove set forth, such Bond Ici the principal selsun% therao~ to be redeemed~ shall become due and payable on the redemption date specifisd in such notice at a price equal to the principal amo~t thereof a~d rede~ption premium, if any, thereon, 91-124 2/27/~L together with the interest accrued an such Bond (or on the principal amount thereof to be r=daemed) tO such date. Whenever payment of such redemption price shall have been duly made or provided for, interest on the Bond {or on the principal a~ount thereof to be redeemed) so called Specified for redemption, (dj Cancellation. All redae2n~d Bonds shall be cancelled and no~ reissued. SECTION 5. Execution and Authentication of Bonds} CUSIP Identification Numbers. (a) ~ecu%ion of Bolds. The ~onds shall executed in the name of the Co%mty by the manual or facmimile signature o~ the Chairman of the Board of supervisors, and =ha C0rDorate seal of the Board of S~Derviscrs shall be impressed, or a facsimile ;hereof prinked, on tho Bonds, attested by the m~nual or facsimils signature of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, neither of which signatures is required to be manual. [b) Authentication of Bonds. The County A~lmiais- trator shall diruu= the Registrar to authenticate the Bends and no Bond shall be valid or obligatol-f for ~ny purpose unless and until the certificate of authentication endorsed on e~ch Bond shall huv~ been manually 9~ecute~ by an authorized signatoi of the Registrar. u~on the authentication of any Bond, the Registrar shall insert in the certificate of authentication thc date as of which such Bond is authenticated ss follows: (1) if the Bo~ is authenticated prior to the first interest pa~nnent date, the certificate shall b~ dated as of the dat~ the Bo~ds are delivered ~o a~d paid for ~y the in,rial purchasers %hereof; (ii) i~ the Bond is authenticated upon an interest pa!a~eet d~ta, tho certi~i=a=e shall ~e dated as of such interest ~alrmunt dat~; {iii) if the Bond is authenticated ea or after the record ~&te ~or =he Da!anent of interest Qn the Bends and prior to such interest payment date, tho ¢~rtificate shall be da~ed au of such interest Da~nent date; a~d (iv) in all other instances, the certificate be dated the date upon which the Bon~ ~s authenticated. The execution and authentication o~ the Bonds in %he manner above set £orth is adopted as a due and sufficient authentication of (c) CUEI~ Identi£icatlon Numbers.. CUSIP idenui- ficahien numbers may he printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print any such number on any ~0nds, nor any error or omissio~ with respect thereto, shall constitute cause for failure or refusa~ by the $~¢¢~ssful bidder for ~he Bonds accept deliverS' of and pay for the Bonds in accordanc~ with number shall constitute or be deemed to b~ e part of any Bond or a pa~t of the contract evidenced thereb~ and no liability shall attach to the County os any of it= offioer~ or agents because of or on aeeounn of any such number or any =se made S~CT~ON 6. Ta~ Covenant. The County covenants and agrees to comply with the p~ovisions of Sections 103 and 1~1-150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 198g and the applic- able Treasur~ Re~/tations promulgated thereunder throughout the term o~ the Bonds.. SECTION 7. Sources of Payment of Bonds. The ~ull faith and credit of the County shall be and ~s of and interest on the Bonds as the same beco~e due. shall b~ levied and collected a/ulually, at the same time and in the same manner as other taxes are assessed, levied and 91-125 2/27/91 collected, ad valorem t~xes without limitation as to rats or a~o%tnt, sufficient to provide for the ps~rment of the principal of and interest oa the Bonds as the s~me respectively become MECTZON 8. Fsrm of Bonds. ~e Bonds shall be 8~ta~tially the fo~ se~ ~orth b~low With ~oh ~o~mary or appropriate variations, omi~$ion~ and insertions as are imcidental to their n~ers~ interest rates an~ mat~ritie~ [ion: UNITF. D ~TATES OF COMNONWEALT~ OF VIRGINIA COU1TI~/ OF CHESTerFIELD PUBLIC IM~ROVF3CENT BOND SERLE~ OF RE~ISTE~ED REGISTERED No. ~- $ INT~$T FJ%TE: MA~7/RZ~ DATE: ORIGINAL ISSUE DA~: CUSIP N0: PRINCIP~ Th~ County of Chemterf±eld (hereinafter re~rred tc as the "County"), a political slfodivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, for value receive4, hereby promises to p~¥ to the Registered Ow~e~ teamed above), or registered a~signs, on the Maturity Pats (specified above), unless this Bond shall have been duly called fez pzevious ~edemptien and payment of the redemption price shall hays been duly made er provided for, the Principal Amount (specified above), and to pay interest on much ~ri~uipat Amount c~ , 19 and somiannual!y on each and there~ter fr~ the dats hereof or from the interest pa~ment date next precedin~ the date of authentication hereof to which interest shall have been paid, unless sush date of authentication is an interest payment date, in which case from such interest payment d~te if interest has been paid to such date, or unless such date of authentication is within the period from [insert appropriate lanp~ege depending on whether interes= payment date is first or fifteenth day of calendar month] to such interest payment date, in which case from such interest payment date if interest has been paid to much date, until the payment of suck above) per a~n~m, bF check or d~ft mailed by the Registrar hereinafter mentioned to th~ Rsgistsred Owner hereof at his address as it appears on the books of registz~y kept by the Registrar, at the nlo~e of business on [insert appropriate lan~age depending on whether interest payment date is firs~ or fifteenth day of calendar month]. The principal of and premiUm, if any, cn this Bond ale pay~l~ upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal ~ice of in the of (the "Registrar"]. 7~e principal of a~d Dromiu~, if any, and interest o~ this Bond are payable im such coi~ or dates of payment is legal tender for p~blie and private debts. This Bend is one of a ~ul~ authorized issue of ~oa~s (hsrein referred to as the "Bonds") of the aggregate principal amount cf Dollars 91-126 2/27/91 ($ ) of like date and tenor herewith, except for number, denomination, interest rate, muturity and red~mpt~o~ provisions, and is issued for the purpose o~ ~nancing the costs of various capital improvement projects in and for the Ceu_qty, under an~ purauan= =o and in full compliance with the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including ChaRter 5 of Title 15.1 of the Code of virginia, 1950 (the same being the Public Finance Act), an eleetioa duly held in the County under such Chapter 5 on Novembe~ 8, 1988, and rosol~tioms duly adopted by The Soard of supervisors of the County under such Chapter 5 on and The Bonds c~ the series of Bonds of which this Bond is one maturing on or b~f~r~ , shall not b~ subjee~ to redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Bonds of the series cf Bonds of which this Bond is one (or portions thereo~ in installments of $5,000) maturing on and aiter shall be subject to redemptio~ at th~ option of the Co~-~ty prier to their stated maturities on or after __, in whole at any tame, o~ in part from time to time on any interest payment date in such order as may be dete~miaed b~ the County (except that if at any time leas than all of the Bonds o~ a maturity are called for redemption, the paztioul~r Bonds or poztisns ~heraa£ to ~ r~eamed shall ~e ~elec~ed by the Registrar by lot), upon payment of the follow- ing redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of %he principal a~o~nt of Bonds to be redeem=d), together with the interest accrued o~ ~¢h principal amount to =he date ~ixe~ for th~ redemption thereo~: Redemption Dates Redemption ~rice~ % If this Bond or any portion of the principal a~ottnt he~oof shall ~e called for red~mptisn, notice Q! tk~ redemp- tion hereof, mpecifying the date, n%~ber a~d muturit~ of this Bond, the da~e an~ place er places fixed for its redemption, the premium, if any, payable ~pon s~ch redemption, and if less than the entire principal ~mou~t of this ~o~d is to the principal ~o~t h~reof to be rede~sd and the issuance a new Bond e~alting in principal ~o~t that portion of the principal ~o~t hereo~ not redeemed, shall be mailed not less by first ula~s ~il, p~tage prepaid, to the Registered ~er o~ this Do~d at his address as it appears o~ %he books of regiatx~ kept bM =he Registrar. I~ notice o~ red--rich the principal ~ount of this Bond (el the portion of the shall hav~ been duly made or provided for, in,erect hereon on the portion of the principal ~o~t hereof to be rede~ed) ~hall ceas~ Zrom ~d after the ~t~ ~o mD~ifi~d for subject to the limitations an~ upon payment of the charges, if any, provided in the proceedings authorizing the Bond~ of the series of which this B~nd i~ one, this Bond may be exchanged at the prieeipal office of the Registrar fur like aggregate principal amount si Bonds of the series which thio Bond i~ one, of other authorized principal amounts si the same interest rate and maturity. This ~ond is transferable by the Registered owner hereof, in person e~ by his a~orney ~uly authorized in writing, at 5he principal office of the Registrar but only in the manner, subject to the limitations and upon payment of the shargos, ii any, in the proceedings authorizing the Bon~s Of the se=ies 91-127 2/27/91 which this Bond is one, and upon %he surrender hereof for cancellation. Upon s~cb transfer, a new Bond or Bonds of the series of which this Bond is one, of authorized ~enominations and of the same aggregate principal amount, will be iazued to the transferee in exchange herefor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Registrar shatl ~ot 5e required to exchange or transfer this Bond later than tho clo~o of ~uslne~a on the forty-fifth (4~th) day next preceding any date fixed for the redemption of thi~ Bond or any portion hereof. The full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably ~ledged tu the pay~en= of the pr~nclpal of and This Bond shall not be valid or obligatory unless the certificate Of authentication hereon uhall have been ma~=ally sig~ed by an authorized aignator of the Registrar. It ia hereby certified, recited and declared that all actS· conditions and things required to have happened, to issuance of this Bond and the aeries of which it is one, do due ~ime, form and manner as required by law, and th~: this Bond and the Bonds of %he seri~s of which this Bon~ i~ one do not excee~ a~y constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedl%e~a. IN WITNESS WHEtLEOF, the Supervlsor~, has ca~n~d this Bend to be executed b~ t~e manual or facsimile signature o~ the Chairman o~ su=h ~eard: a hereon, attested by the manual or facsimile si~nat%Lre of the · 19 . Clerk oi the Board of Supervisors thai=man of the Boa=d of supervisors C~-~I~ICA-~E OF AUT~TICATIQ~ This ~ond ia one o~ th~ ~onds ~elivezed pursuant to the within-mentioned proceedings. .], Registrar Authorized Si~nator Da~e of Authentioa=ien: For velum r~ceived, the undersignmd hermby mall(m), assign(s) and transfer(s~ unto (Please print or t!r~s name and address, inslnding postal 91-128 2/27/91 INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OF TRANSFEREE: hbo within Bond and all rights thez~umder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints , reqistration thereof, with full power of substitution in the Dated: Signature{s) NOTICE: Siqnat~e(s) must be guaranteed bF a member firm of The New York Stock Exchange, Inc. cz a cox~eruial bank trust company. (Signature(s) of Registered owner) NOTICE: The si§nature(s) above mu~t corre~p0nd with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond i~ ever~ particular, without altera- change whatsoever. SECTION 9. Sale Of Ben~s. The Count~ Administrator is hereby authorized to cause to be p~blished and distributed s Summary Notice o~ Sale and/or Detailed Notice e~ Sale of ~on~ and to cause to be distributed to prospective O~ and investors in the Bonds such Statuary Notice of Sole and/or Detailed N~tice of Sale, a form Of PIoposal for the purchase cf the Bonds and a Preliminary Official Statement of the County relating tO the Bonds. SECTION 10. Bond Antioipatio~ Notes. Publiu Improvement bond anticipation notes are authorized for issuance and sale b~ the County in anticipation of the issuance cf the public improvement bond~ authorized for issuance herein. Such no,es stall be sold. at competitive or negotiated sale at not less than pa~ plus accrued interest and C~ such other terms and cnnditions as are determined by the County Administrator. If such notes are offered for competitive sale, a Summaly Notice c~ Sale and/or Detailed Notice of gala shall ba prepared, p~blished ~d ~istribute~, aBd a form of ~ro~osal ~nr ~urchaee ~repared and distributed, in accordance with Section 9 hereof. There i= also ~uthorized te be prepared and distributed in accordance with section 9 hereof a prelim%nary and libel Official s~a~ement relating s~oh notes in such form as shall be approved by the County Administrator. The issuance and details of ~uch notes shall be govez~ed by the ~revi~ions of Section 15.1-223 of the Code of Virginia, 1950. The provisio~s of Sections 6 and 7 hereof shall apply to such notas tc th~ same extent the same apply tc the Bonds except, in the case of the provisions of ~uch Section 7, onl~ to the extent such notes are not paid from the proceeds of the Bonds or from any other available funds. The · ale of ~uch notes and the form and other detail~ thereo~ shall be apDr0ved, ratified and confirmed by resolution o£ the Board o~ Supervisors e~ the County, Bonds in anticipation of w~ich such bond anticipation notes are issued pursuant to this provimions o~ this resolution at any time within five (5) 91-129 2/27/91 years of the date of issuance of the fi/st notes issued in anticipation of suck Bonds. SZCTION 11. Filiaq of This Resolution. The Cuu-qty Attorney is hereby authorized und directud to file a copy of =his resolution, cci=iliad by the Clerk of the Board of ~upervisors to be e true and correct copy here~, with the Circuit Court o~ the County e~ Ches~ezfie!d. SECTION 12. Invalidity of Sections, Paragraphs, Clauses or Previsions. If any sectlon~ paragraph~ clause oI provision of this resolution shell be held invalid or unen~rce~le for any reason, th9 invalidity or u~e~force- ability o£ SUCh section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the remaining per:ions of =his resol~ien. SECTION 1~. Headings of Sections. The headings of the se~tion~ of this resolution shall be solely for conveni~nc= cf reference an~ shall not a£~ect the meaninu, construction, interpretation o~ effect of such sections or of this resolution. SECTION 1~. Effective Date. ~his resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. A~es: ~r, Sullivan, Mr, Applegate and Mr. Mayas. Absent: ~r. Currin and Mr. Daniel. Mr. Currin returned to the meeting. ll.C. P~SOL~i~ OF ~ BOARD OF SOl~riSO~ ~WI~3ESTI~G ~ ~K~%~K~4 Q~RTI~ BE pLA.u~o ON -r~u~ NO~F~B~R, 1991 BALDOT ~KLA~TiNG TO '~ C[~P~OLIDA~I(H~ (~ Mr. Micas briefly explained the request ~or Charter amendments services and revisions to the real estate assessment process. Nr. Mayas stated his r~que~t was precipitated by the numerous telephone calls and letters he had received from constituents indicating their concerns about these matters and he felt the Board of Supervisors and citizens should be included in this process; noted he would not have a problem with considering a tax in~rease if all of the duplicated services were eliminated (i.e, duplicated motor pools, legal staffs, planning staffs, etc.); and stated this request was an attempt to lessen impact oa the t~xpayers. When asked, Mr. ~icas indiuated he did not perceive a probiem with ~mending the charter tala=ire to ~he consolidation of ~ehocl/ccunty ~ervice~ so long as such action ~i~ not intrude upen educational services; however, he felt the School Board would take the position that snch action wonld intrude their During brief discussion, Mr. Ramsay outlined several services which were either already =cmbine~ or anticipated to combined in the near future (i.e., motor pools, comp=tar servises, Purchasing department, with others under study]. Mr. Applegate suggested that since ~Ir, Daniel was not present and was instrumental in the establishment of the Charter the Board de~er consideration of the issue~ until he could be neceSSary and that public coK~ent should be permitted regard- ing these issues but agree~ to defer discussion of same until ~r. Daniel could be present. 91-130 1/27/91 on motion of Mr. ApDlegate, seconded by M~. Currin, the Board dufurr~d until March 13, 1991 consideration Of a resolution oi Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, ~r. C~rrln, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Mayas. ~se~t: Fir. Daniel. On motion of Mr. ApDle~ate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board suspended its rules to allow simultaneou~ nomination/appoint- ment and reappoinT-meat of members to the Keep Chesterfield County Clean Corpo=ation. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Cuzrin, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Mayes, /~bsent: ~r. Daniel. On motion of Fir. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, th~ Board ~imultaneo~ly nominated/apF~int~d a~d reappointed the followin~ persons 5o serve OR the Keep Chesterfield County Clean Corporation, whose t~rn~ ara eff~ctXve immediately and ~r. warren Dieterich ~s. P~m Rickett Mrs. Mary Cooper Ms. Alma Smith Ms. Anne Belshn Midlothian District Bermuda District ~Latoaca District Dale District Clover Hill District Absent: Mr. Daniel. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. sullivan, the Board nominated Mr. Maurice B. Sullivan, Midlothia~ Dist~rict Su~ervisoIs, and Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr., Bermuda District Supervisor~ to serve o~ the Committee t~ S~ud¥ the Feasibility of Creating a Regional Water Authority, whose ~ormal appsintment~ will be made on March 13, t991, Ayes: ~r. Sullivan, ~r. currln, Ma. Applegate and ~l~. Mayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr. Sullivan noted this cor~mittee would be comprised o~ ele=te~ u~ficials and county administrators and/or oity ll.B. CO}~IF~fT~DEVELOi~qT ITI~IS ll.B.1. ~ LI~ I~UESTS On motion of Mr. Mayes, ~econded by M~. Applugutu, thu Boar~ approved obtaining cost estimates for the installation of street lights at the 9ollowing location~ in the ~atoeoa District, even though the loca=ion~ do not meet the e~tablished criteria b~t beca~e~ t~ey po~e safety problems: 1. Middle of the 21000 block of Orange ~ilt Avenue; 91-131 2/27/91 2, ~uth of the intersection of Greenwood Drive and Ruttedge Avmnue (from existin~ pole ao~th of the intersection); 5. Hopkins Street between Orange Hill AVenUe and Rutledqe Avenue; ~, Middle of the 21200 block oS Orange Hill Avenue; and 5. Hopkins Street between Orange Hill Avenue and Chesterfisld Avenue. Ayes: Mr. sullivan, Mr. Ceftin, Mr. Applegate and Mr~ Mayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. On motion of ~r. Applegate, s~¢onded by Mr, CLtrrin, the Board referred to ~he Planning Co~ission for public hearing ~d reeQmmen~ation proposed amendments to the Midlothian Area Co,unity Plan, ~peoifically ad~rns~in~ amendments to= 1. Delete the proposed V0 foot collector roa~ linking realigned Wiute!field Road with Route 60; and 2. Expand ~he boundaries of the designated Village Area to incorporate the LeGordon Drive/Garnett Lane neighborhood. Ayes= Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Curtis, Mr. Appl~gate a~d Mr. ~a~es. Absent~ Mr. Daniel. Mr. Cuzrln uQted that citizens in the Midlothian and Bermud~ Districts had financed the purchase of trees ~or beautifica- tion projects in their Distrlc=s, however, he understood the state had financially assisted in the beautification of the area frem ~he Courthouse to t~e new Courts Buildiag~ and asked the County Administrator to addres~ the State as to their proGedures for determining who would or would not reseivs financial assistance in such projects. 11.~.3. APPLICATI(~ FOR VIRGIRIA CO~I~ D~%~uOP[~q~ BLOC~ GRANT On motion cf Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board authorized the County Administra=er to submit the necessary application for a Virginia Community Devmlopment B!c~k Grant and appropriated necessary funds upon approval by the Slate, for ~he development of a unified/¢oordina=ed property r~lated code enforcement D~ogram in the ~ataoca, Bermuda and Dale Districts, the purpose of said progra~ being to encourage the rebuilding and r~novation of older and deteriorating neighborhoods ena comprehensive basis and which funds would be used to cross-train and staff the unified code program as well a~ provide a fundin~ incentive for eligible property owners to correct building code violations. Ayes~ ~r- Sullivan, Mr- Currin, Mr- Applegate a~d ~r- Mayer. ~bsent: Mr. Daniel. ll.F. CONS]~TT A=~z4S 11.F.1. ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR 'r~ P~RC~%ME OF pLAYGrOUND On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board tranaferrs~ $3~6Q0 from the Dale District Street Light Account 91-132 2/27/91 to the Parks and Rucreatic~ Department to supplement donated ~un~s in the amount eX $8,90U ~rom the Salem Church Elementary School PTA for the purchase of playground equipment and surfacing material for Salem Church Elementary School, the in the amount of $8,980 from the Salem Church Elementary School for aaid project. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. C~rrin, Mr. Applegate an~ Mr. Mayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. ll.F.2..AUT~ORtZATI~ TO SET A PUBLIC ~EARING DATE AND TO There was lengthy discussion regarding the procedure used tu authorize the ~etting of the publi~ hea~ing date for advertising tax rates a~d fe~ changes ~er Sta~e law; the aced to modify the process to allow public input prior to the ~ee changes once the public he~ had th~ opportunity to voice the c~nts/opinions; ~ossibl¥ readvertisin~ fur another public hearing to allow an increase in the tax rates and fee changes, if necessary; inclusion in t~e 1992 Le~islatlve Program of a request to modify the procedure; the County needed t~ ~ind alternative mechanisms for providing servioe~ and absorbin~ costs without t~ inereases~ and that he did not support a tax increase. Messrs- Sullivan and currin ~tatad they did not favor tax increases, however, felt the procedure by which the county had to proceed to set tax rates, fee changes and public hearing dat~ n~ded review and m0~ifica~ion. ~r. Ramsay not~ t~a= i~ t~e Scar~ were to conduct its pufolic hearing and, after hearing public necessitate advertisement for another public hearing in thirty (30) days, would delay tax bill~ being di~emminste~, and would result in late recei~al o~ tax revenue~ to the County. Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Currin indi0ated a~ least =h~re could be another heating, if necessary. On motion o~ Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Board set the dote of April 3, 1991 at 7:80 p.m. ~cr a public hearing to consider fee changes a~ the following Droposed tax rates: Rual ~state $1.Q9 Personal Property 3.60 Personal ~rop~rty for M~mnbers of Rescue ~c~uads and Volunteer Fire Departments Machinery and Tools 1.0D Aircraft 1.1~ 9-1-1 Telephone Tax [from .35 t~ .50) .SD per month Ayes= Mr. Sullivan, ~ffr. Coffin, Mr. Appleqate and Mr. Mayes. Abu~nt: ~r. Daai=l. ll.F.3. On ~otien of Mr. Coffin, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, the Beard approved a reques~ for a raffle permi~ from the Midlothian Woodlake Liens Club for calendar year 1~91. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, ~lr. Curri~, kbs~nt: Mr. Daniel. 91-133 2/27/91 ll,G. UTIIETI~.S DF, P{ I~ ABANDON ~ P0]~t~fI0!~ 0F ST'Aq~ ~[~RIE (ROu'rm 698) Mr. ~al~ mtated thi~ date had been advertised for a public ~rtion of State Avenue (Route of this portion of State Ave~e, dmclared a ~onflic~ interest p~suant to the Virginia comprehensive Conflict of Interest A~t and ~x~used h~se!f from ~he Mr. Jim Morris~ one of the property o~er~, was present. There was no o~sition present. Thur~ was b~ief discussion relative to the ~nership o~ thu DXODer~Y; notification of adopted the following: ~s, By resol~io~ of the Virginia Depar~ent of Eighways and Transportation Co~iasion, effuctiv= ~y 1, 1947, ~S, Since ~y 1, 1947, State Avenue, Rout~ 698, has control, su~rvision, management, and jurisdiction of the Virginia Depar~en% of Highways an~ Tr~sportation; ~d ~E~A$, Rivermont Associates has re~este~ that the of Sta~e Avenue, Route 698, p~suant to Section 33.1-151 the Code of Virginia, 1950, as ~nded; and ~, Pursuant to a r~solution ~f this Board J~uary 9~ 1991, ~h~ r~ired no,ices of the Co~ty's intention to ~andon that portion of State Avenue, Route 698, p~lish~d in the Ric~ond News Seeder, having circulation within the cowry; ~d on January 14, 1991, a ~REAS, No lando~er affectud b~ the proposed ~andon- men~ has filed a pe=i~ion for a D~lic hearing; ~A8, This Resolution and Order is entersd within fo~ described ~ove~ and ~AS, The safety and welfare of the p~lic would be best se~ed by the abando~ent of a portion of State Avenue, Route 698, as a p~lic road; and Rou~ 698, as a p~lic roa~ will no= ~ridge =he righum of any NOW, T~O~ BE IT ~SOLV~ ~ 0~, that p~su~t ~o Section ~3.1-151 of the Cod~ of Virginia, 1958, a~ ~ended, the portion of secondary road, more fully described ~ollow~, im hereby abandoned as a p~lic road: A portion of State Avenue, Route 598, within Bermuda Magisterial District, as shown on a plat prepared by charles November 30, 1959, a cep~ of which is The sffeet of this Resolution a/~d Order, pursuant to Section 33.1-153 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, us amended, is that the above described portion of State Avenue, Route 698, shall not remaia a public road or crossing. Accordingly, the Clerk o~ this Board shall send a oerti~ied copy of this Resolution and Order, together with the plat h~reto attached, to the State Transportation Commis- sioner. The Clerk shall request that the CommiEsionsr ts the County, pursuant to Section 33.!-154 of the Code of virginia, 1950, as amended, that the above described portion of State Avenue, Route 698, is no longer necessary for public Ayes: Mr. Sullivan~ Mr. Applegate and Mr. Absent: Er. Curzin and Mr. Daniel. ~r. Currin returned to the meeting. ll.s.2.a. CCR~q~ANCE OF EASEi~i~ ~0 VIRGINIA ~C AHD POWERCC~PANYAT~0NACANHr~H$C~0OL on motion of ~r. Applegate, seconded by Fur. Currin, =he ~card authorized the Chairman of t~e Board and the CoUnty Adminis- trator to execute an easement agre~ent with Virginia Electric and Power Company for the installatis~ of undergrctu~d cable within a ~5 foot easement at Monacan High School to provide service to Stoneclop Subdivi~±on. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, ~r. Currin, Mr. Applegate and Fur. Mayes. Abssnt~ Mr. Daniel. 11.G.Z.b. ACCF2TANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG BALDWIN On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by ~ir. currin, the Board accepted on behal£ of the County the conveyance of ~ parcel of land containing 0.343 acrs along Baldwin Creek Road and Bull $~reet Bead from ~r, John F. Alexander an~ au~horize~ the County Administrator to e~eeute tbs necessary deed. (A cop~ of said pla~ im file~ with ~e papers of this ~o~d.) Ayes: Mr. Sulliv~, ~. Currin, Mr. Ap~l~gate mhd ~. ~yes. ~sent: Mr. Daniel. ll.G.2.c. _HEQ. ~EST TO .QUITCI~IM A PC~iON OF A S~LK~_'~ DRAINAGE ~ AC~OEE ~ROPE~TY OWNED BY VILLE DBVELOt~T COI~P Mr. Applegate disclosed te the Beard that he is a creditor to the $on~e~ville Development Corporation, declared a co~£1ict of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Aot and exsused himself from ~he me,ting. On motion of Mr. Currin, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Beard approved a request from Balker ai%d Associates to q~itclaim a portion of a sixteen foot drainage easement acrs~ property 91-15~ 2/27/91 owned by sommervill~ Development Ce~po~atien and authorized the Chairman ef the Board and County Administrator to execute the necessary qui~clalm deed for s~me. (A copy o~ said plat is filed with the pa~urs of this Board.) Ayes: ~r, Sullivan, Mr. Currin and Mr. Absent: Mr. Applegate and Mr. Daniel. Mr. Applegate returned to the meeting. ll.G.]. ~K~ORTS Mr. Sale presented thc Board with a report on the developer water and sewer contracts executed by th~ county Administra- tor. Mr. Ramsay presented the Board with n status report on the Gen~xal PULed Contingency ~e~ou~t, G~neral Fur~ ~alance, Resel~ve for Futura Capital Projects, District Roa~ and Street infomational memorandum regardin~ ~e Chesterfield Business It was generally agreed to recess for flv~ {5) minutes. ll.I. FINANCIALADVI$0~P~ES~NTA~ION Mr. Harsher intr~uoed Mr. william w. ("Billy") cobbs, Chairman of the P~lic Resources Advisory Group, wh~ pr~ment~ ~ overvlew relating to the County's Debt ~anagement Policies, a copy of which information is filed with the papers of thie Boar~. Discussion, ~estiorb~ and comments ensued relative to a xeviuw of the County's debt management policies; =he LmDortance of maintaining General Fund UnaDDropziat=d Fund Balance and Building Capital Reserve; the importance o~ retainin~ '~Aaa"eredit xating; the ~urrent ~concmic situation and its relationship to debt capacity; financing techniques as they relate to credit agencies; established target and ceiling values for certain deb~-ro!a~ed finaneia~ ratios; retirement of dubt; an update of the County's debt management progra~ for fiscal years 1992-95 and its impact On key debt ratios: projected debt ratios for FY1991-95 and the risks associated with ratios exceeding the 10% target and 11% ceiling; eo~pari=un o~ Chesterfield County debt service with other juIisdietiona and causes o~ same [i.e., Fairfax); the County's current StatUS with various investors and finanaial aaalys~ a~encles: etc. Mr. Sullivan stated the Board h~ i~it=d members of the School Board/Admi~istratio~ =o a==end the meeting, noted that also present were ~n~e of the membe=s of thc Revenue Resources and Znfrastruoture Committe~ and inquired if they had qucs- tion~ the~ wished t~ ask Mr. Cobbs. Mr. Willis Blackwood, Ch~sterfield Business Council representative on t~e Revenue ReSources Committee, raised questions relative t¢ the ~igni- 91-136 2/27/91 ficanoe of the County's total debt ratios, unused tax capacity, etc. The Boa~d e~pressed appreciation for Hr. Cobbs' informative ~resentatlon, noting that the "Aaa" credit rating permitted thm County ~o attract low interest zetas on County debt transactions. Mr. Cobb~ indicated he would forward data to the Bcar~ relative to which jurisdictions were currently the highest rated with the bond agencies. ll.J. LUNCH The Board recessed at 12:O0 Noon for lunch in th~ Board Room ll.K. RF~UgSTS F(~MOBII~HO~I~/~ITS A~DRF. ZONING 91~0118 In Clover ~ill ~gisterial District, BI~ rezoning fr~ General Business (B-3) to Co.unity (C-3). The densit~ o~ such ~en~ent will zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The Co~r~h~nsive Plan designates the prop~x~y for ge~eral colorola1 ~e wi~h ieet on the south line o~ Midtothian ~Enpike, also frontin~ aDDrox~ately 170 ~eet on the week line of Reaearch Road, and roads. T~ ~ap 17-9 (1) Parcel 59 (Shee~ 8). the ~l~ning ~isgion race--ended approval. ~r. ~ward Willey~ Jr.~ stated the reco~endation accept~le. ~exe was no opposition approved Case 91SN0118. Ayes; ~. Sullivan, Mr. Coffin, ~. Applegate and ~. Mayas. ~m~n~: ~. Daniel. 91~0129 IR Matoaca Magisterial District, GLA~YS T. C~ILDR~SS requested renewal of Mobile HOme Permit 86SR032 to park a mobile home in a Residential (R-7) District. The density of the proposal approximately .61 unite/acre. ~he Comprehensive Pi~ units/acre. This property fronts the sou~ line of Ti~ton better kn~n as 2903 Tipton Street. T~ Nap 149-14 {12) Milhorn Tract, Block C, Lot 4 Mr. Jacobsen presented a surmnar¥ of Case 91~R0129 and s~ated ~taff race.ended approval of the regueat, subject to ~tandard conditions. Ms. Gladys T. childresa stated the recommended conditions were acc~ptabi~. There wa~ no Opposition present. 91-137 2/27/91 O~ motion of Mr. Mayeo, eecended by Mr. Ceftin, the Boa~d approved Case 91aR0129 for seve~ {7) years, subject to the followiBg standard conditions: 1. The applicant shall b~ the owner and occupant of the mobile hO~e~ 2. ~o lot or parcel may be rented or loa~e~ fox use as a mobile home site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental property. Only on~ (1) mobile hume shall be permitted to be parked on a~ individual lot or parcel. 3. The mini~num lot size, yard setbacks, required ~ront yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable zunlng district shall he complied with, except that no mubile home ~hall b~ located closer than ZO feet to any o~isting residence- No additional permanent-type livin~ space may be added onto a mubile home. All mobile homes shall be skirted but shall not be plaoed on a permanent fo=nde%ion- 6. Upon beiBg granted a ~obile ~ome Permit, the applicant shall then obtain the necessary per. its from the Offioe of the ~uil~ing official. Tl~is shall be done prior to the installation or relocatio~ o~ the mobile home. 7. Any violation of the abate conditions shall be ~rounds for revocation o~ ~he Mubi~ Hume Permit. A~es: Mr. Sullivan, ~r. Currin, Mr. Applegat¢ a~d ~r. Hayes. Absent: Hr. Daaiel. 91~R0137 I~ ~ermuda Flagist=rial Diatriot~ ]3(~q~%LD ~]~E MILLE~{, ~. requested renewal of Mobile some Permit $65R030 to p~rk a mobil~ home in a Rasiduntiai (R-7) District. The d~n~i%y of the proposal is approx~at~ly 2.17 uniUs/acre. The Comprehen- to 4.00 units/aor~. Thim ~r~perty ~ronts %he north line of }erlock Road, opposite of Quail O~s Avenue~ ~d is better known as 263~ Perlook Road. T~x Ma~ 81-1~ (3) Quail Oaks, section 2, ~lock 4, Lot ~ (~he,t 23). ~. Jacobsen Dresen~sd a s~a~ of Cas~ 915R0137 and mtated staff reco~end~d approval, ~ject tO ~tand~d conditions. ~r. Donald Miller, Jr. stated the reco~end~ conditions were acceDta~l~. Ther~ was n~ oD~osi%iu~ present, On motion of ~. Ceftin, ~econded~ Mr. ADplega~e, the Board a~roveO Ca~e 91SR0137 for ~v~n (7) y~a~z, z~j~ct to th~ following stan~rd conditions: 1. The applicant shall be th~ owner ~d occup~t ~f the mobile home. t. No let ur parcel may ~e ren~ed o~ leased for use as a mobil~ home ~it~, no~ ~kall a~y ~obile home ~a u~ed f~r rsntal ~roD~rty. Only one (1) mobil~ home shall be p~rmitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel. 3. The mini~ lot size, yard so,acks, re~ired front yard, and other zonin~ re~ir~entz of the aDplic~le zoning district shall be complied with, except that no mobile 91-138 2/27/91 home shall be locate~ closer than 20 feet to any existinu onto a mobile home. All mobile home~ shall be skirted but shall not be placed on a permanent foundation. 5. Where public (County} water and/or sewer are available, they shall be used. 6. Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permit, the applicant shall then obtain the necessary permits from the Office c~ the Building O~icial. 5~nis shall be done prior to thc ins=allation or relocation u~ the mobile homo. 7. Any viola=i0n of the above conditions ~hall be grcund~ for revocation of the Mobile Home Permit. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr, Ceftin, Mr. Applegate and Mr. ~Layes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. In Midlothian Magisterial DisLrict, DO~INI~ L. B~ ru~tcd renewal of Mobile Home Pe~t 86SR031 to park a moDile home in a Light Industrial (~-1) District. The project density will ¢omply with County de~lopment The comprehensive Plan ~esi~a=es the property for c~ercial use with density to be controlled by zoning conditions or ~id~othian T~npike~ op~ite of Wa~worth Drive, and better kno~ as 8610 Midlothian ~rnpik~. T~ Map 28-2 ~. Otis L. Brown stated the race--ended condition~ On mo=ion o~ ~r. sullivan, seconded by ~. A~Iegat~, the Board apDroved Cane 91SR0138 for three (3) yearn, ~ject the following stan~rd con~tions: 1. The applicant shall be th~ o~er and occupant o~ the mobile home, No lot or parcel may be rente~ cz leased for use as a mobile home site, nor shall an~ mobile h~e be used Debitted to ~ Darked on an individual lot cz parcel. The minim~ lot size, yard setback, ra~ired front ~ard, district shall be c~plie~ with, except that no mobile home sh~ll be located closer than 20 f~et to any residence. No additional pe~anent-t~e living space ~ay be a~ onto a mobile home. All mobile h~es shall be skirted ~ut ~hall not be placed on a pe~ent foundation. ~. ~ere p~lic (Cu~ty) water and/or sewer are avail~le, they shall be used. 6. Upon b~ing granted a Mobile Home Pe~it, the aDDlicant shall then ob%ai~ the necessa~ pe~its from the of the Building Official. This shall b~ done prior to the installation or relocation o~ the mobile home. 91-139 2/27/91 revocation of the Mobile Home Permit. $ulliva~ ~r. ~urrin, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Mayes. Daniel. Agricultural {A) to Residential (R-9). Residential ~e cf up to 4.84 units per acre is p~rmitted in a Residential (R-9) District. The Comprehensive Plan designates the propsr~y residential use of 1.51 unit~ per aer~ or less~ This request lie~ On an 86.8 acre parcel frontln~ in two (2) places for a total of approximately 441 feet o~ the west lin~ of Bailey Brid~e Road, al~o frcntinq approxi~atel~ 187 feet on the north line of Quailwood Scad, approximately %,2Q5 feet west of Bailey Bridge Road, and located northwest of the inter~etion of these reade. Tax Map ~2-15 (l) Parcel 20; T~x Map 76-2 P~reel 6; and Tax Map 76-3 (1) Parcel 27 (Sheet another meetin~ with the applicant tc further discuss their deferral. On motion o£ Mr. Mayes, second~/ b~ M~. Apple~ate, the Board deferred Case 89s~0340 ua~il ~arch 27, 199!. ATee~ Mr. Sulllv~n, ~r. Currin, Mt. App%egats and Mr. 908N0281 In ~atcaca ~agisterial District, L. PACE ~ re~ue~ted a ninety (901 day deferral of an amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 82S041) to allow transfer o~ the cpesa~ion o~ a D0arding he,ss in a Residential (R-71 District. The density of such amendment will be controlled bF zoni~ conditions or Ordinance s~aadar~s. ~he Comprehensive Plan designates the propert~ fO~ ze~idential u~e of 4.01 to 7.00 units per acre. ~his ze~uest lies on a 0.46 acrs parcel fronting approximately 85 f~et on the northeast line ~f Third Tax Map 15~-1~ (2) Boisseau, Lot 35A (Sheet 54). the applicant has re~eEted a ninety (90) day deferral~ Mr. Oliver D. Rude, representing the applicant, stated he had Only ~es~n%ly become invulvs~ with %his request, ~ha% he was not completet~ ~amilier with all the aspects of the requemt or prepare~ ~e proeee~ w~h the case without having ha~ input with those involved and requested a deferral for ninety (90) days. Mr. George Beadles voiced support ~or deferral until ~uch ti~e spokeaper~on for Ettrick on the Move, voiced opposition to a proposed use and de not wi~h to mee further deferrals of the case. Dr. Elizabeth Howard, represen~in9 vi~glnia state University, voiced opposition to the proposed use and any further deferrals of ~he case as it was felt that s~oh action 91-140 1127/g~ would cast doubt on their input into what happens in the community and they did not feel they could proceed with any other lon~-ranGe planning efforts for this area until this issue was resolved. ~r. Rudy stated he was willing to meet with cez~0u_qity groups and organization~ to di~cuse their ~oncern~ and to bring the proposed use within the parameters of what the commu~lity desired. ~r. Ma~es state~ he had received numerous telephone calls and cerres~ondense in opposition ~o ~his reques~ and tha~ he was convinced the proposed use was an imposition into an sstablishsd single family residential community and did not belong in this ~r. Mayes made a motion, seconded by FLr. Applegate, to deny Brief discussion ensued relative to the history of request; whether or not the bank had a vested interest in the recfuest; etc. ~rnen asked, FLT. Micas stated the question befor~ the Board was d~erral of the reguest, not approval the use, therefore, the motion was out o~ order. Mr. Sullivan stated the request would be placed i~ its regular sequeno~ the agenda in order to consider the proposed use. 89s~10422 (Amended) In Clover Hill Magisterial District, J~ES ~ reguested ameuclment to Conditional Use ~lanned Developments (Canes 83S024 and 88SN0082) to De~it an ~ulance ger~ioe -and parking excep~io~ ~e density of such ~ua~nt will be controlled by coning conditions or Ordinance standards. ~he co~rehensive Plan desi~a~es ~he proper~y for light industri- al use with density to be dete~n~ by develop=ut ~ions. This r~es= lies in a Light Industrial (M-l) DiBtri~t O~ a 2.3 acre pa:cml ironti~ upprux~at~ly 278 feet on thc east line of Jenston Willis Dzive, approx~tely 1,130 south of ~dlothian ~rnpike. T~ ~D t7-10 (1) Parcel 32 and ~. Jacobsen presented a s~ary of Case 89~042~ and stated the Planning Co--salon reco~ended approval, s~ject certain co~itions. Mr. J~e~ K~b~d, representing the re,est, stated the reco~ended conditions were acceDt~le. There was no opposition present. On motion o~ ~. Applegate, seconded by ~. Ceftin, the Board approved Case 895N0422, ~j~ct ~o =he f~ll~ing condition: 88SN0082, an ~ulanc~ ~e~icu shall ~ pu~ittud. (P) 2. There shall ~e no external sire~ or p~lic systems with the ~ul~ce service usm. The Director of Planning may approve p~kin~ on land, other than the zonZng lot on which the b%ilding located, provided the o~er o~ the building obtains Director of Planning or provided the ~er of the build- ing ob=~ias ~ easement, the te~s of which shall acceptable to the Direc=or o~ Pla~ing. ~y ~ueh Circuit Court. 91-141 2/27/~1 tc conditions of approval of b. All cenditione of Boning approval remain in effect. c. Parking spaces must be provided Zoning Ordinance requirements.) Ayes: Nr. sullivan, F~r. Currin, Mr. ApDlegate and ~r. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 9L~Olll In Bermuda Magisterial District, plfk%FF~ D~ C~a- re~ta~ant in a Residential (R~lS) District. Residential use o~ up to 2.9 ~its per acre i~ p~rmitted in a R~gident~al (R-15) District. The dcnsit~ o~ suoh ~en~ant will ba controlled ~ zoning condi~io~ or Or~n~ce st~dazdu. Th~ Co~rehenaive Plan des~atea the propert~ foT c~ercial use with density ~o be d~termined by development re,la,ions. approxLmately 343 feet on the east line of King~ton Avenue, and located in the northea~ ~adrant of the interseotion ~f these roads. T~ Map 118-14 [1) ~art of ~arcel 40 ($hee= ~). the Planning Co~ssion rec~anded approval, s~ject to a the ~tree= fr~ the s~ject site~ declared a conflict of interest p~suant to the Virginia Comprehe~iv~ Conflict cf Interest Act an~ excused h~self fr~ ~e meeting. ~r, Taylo~ Warner, representing th~ re,est, Sta%~ the race,ended condition was aGc~pt~le. ~ere was no opposition On motion of Mr. Appl~gate, seconded by MI. ~ayes, :he Board aDgrov~d Case 91SN0iil, s~jeot to the fotl~inq conditio~: In addition to the ~ses Debitted for that per=ion of ~ ~ay 5, Tract h, which is the s~ject of this application~ fast food a. This condition is in addition to Condition i of Ca~u 87s039. b. All other conditions of case 87S039 remain applic~le.) Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Kr. Applegate and ~. Mayer. ~sent~ Mr. C~rin an~ Mr. Daniel. Mr. Currin returned to the mseting. 91SNOl12 I~ Bermuda Magisterial District, ~RE~--D~E A~SOCIAT~ requested rezoning from community Business (B-2) and General B~si~ass (~-3) to Community Bus,ness (C-F}. Tk~ density o~ 91-142 2/27/91 such amendmenL will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for gensral commercial use with density to be determined by development regulations. This request lies on of West Hundred Road, measured from a point approximately 158 approximately 6gO feet on the west line of Jeffermon Pavia Mighway, approximately 700 ~eet south of Wes: Humdre~ Road. Tax Map 116-6 (1) ~art of Parcels 1O~ and 105 (Sheet 32). 51r. Jacobsen pre~ented a summary of Case 91SNDll2 and ~tated the Planning Commission reco~uended approval. Mr. Oliver D. Rudy, representing the ret/test, ~tated the Planning Cu~miasion's recommendation was a~omptable. There was no opposition present. On motion of Mr. C~in, sec0~ded by ~z. ADDlegate, t~e Boar~ approved Case 915N0112. Ayus: Mr. Sullivan, M~. Curxi~, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Mayes. Absent: Mr. Daniel. 91SN012~ In Bermuda Magisterial District, NINA SHO(~II~ requested r~zoning from ~eav~ In,ua=rial (~-3) to Heavy Industrial with Condition~i Use to permit a ma~ina. The density of s~eh amendment will b~ ¢on~roll~d by zoning ¢ondition~ or ordinane~ standards. The Compr~hensiv~ Plan d~signates the property for general industrial ~se and 10O year floodplain with be determined by development regulations. This request lies on 29.03 acres ~ronting approximately 50 feet on the north llne of Bellwood Ro~d, approximately 2,900 feet east of Maven Avenue. Tax Ma~ 68-6 (~) Bellwood Farms, Lots 17C, 19, 20 and 21 and Tax Map 68-10 (2) Betlwood Farms~ Lots 18 an~ 19 (Sheet 23}. Mr. Jacobsen presented a s~nmary of Case 91SM0123 and stated the Planning Co~mmission recommended approval, subject certain con~ition~ and acceptance of t~e applicant's proffered Conditions. ~s. Nine Shoosmith s~aLad the reeo~ended conditions were acceptable. Mr. George Beadles voiced, opposition to the proposed request. Mr. sullivan s~a=ed ~ha~ since there was · opposition to the ~eque~t it would be placed in it~ ~egular sequence on the ager~dm. 91~N0125 In Clover ~ill Magisterial District, ~rrf-A~E CLA~KRO~Z~ON re,tested amendment to Conditional Uses (Cases 80S163 and $25088) relative to opexating rights o~ a ~hild ~ay car~ ~enter. The density of such amendment will be controlled ~¥ zoning conditions or ordinance standards. Ths Comprehensive Pl~ designates the proper=w ~or p~lic/se~-p~lic us~ with re~emt lies in an Aqricultural (A) District on a 15.74 acre Academy Drive, approximately 80 fe~t east of Condre~ Ridge Drive. Tax MaD 38-10 (1] Parcel 1 (sheet 14). Mr. Ja~sh~en presented a summary of Case 91SN0t25 and stated the Planning Commission recommended approval, subject to a single condition. 91-143 i 2/27/91~ / Ns. Betty-Anne Clark Ruberscn stated the recommended condition was ecceptable. Mr. George Beadles voiced Opposition ~o tko propoze~ request. Hr. Sullivan ststed that since there was opposition present the request woul~ be placed in its regular sequence on the agenda. 91~0127 In Clover Hill ~agisterial Distriot, WIV-~-I~. requested rezoning from Office Bus,ness (0) %~ Corporate O~ice (0-2). The d~nsit~ o~ such ~n~ent ~ill be ~ontr~ll- hansive Plan designates the DroDer~y for office use with density to be dete~ine~ by development repletions. This re~es~ lies on a 0.86 acre paroel fronting approx~ately 150 north cf Provincet~ Drive. Tax ~ap 28-4 (9) Cloverlaa~ Wes= Office Pa~k ii, Lots i ~hrough 8 (Sheet Mr. Ja=obson ~res~nted a s~a~ of Case 91SN0127 ~d stated the Pl~in~ Co~issio~ reconveyed approval. Mr. K~vin McKe~ey, representing the applicant, reco~endation was accept~le. ~. ~orge Beadles voiced since =here was opposition to the re,est it would be placed in its re~lar se~enca on the agenda. 91SN0113 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, BRAND(~ CORIKIRATION requested a conditional use to permit an outdoor advertising sign in an Agricultural (A) District. The density of such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standards. Th~ Comprehensive Plan desiqnates the property for reside~tia! uso o~ 1.51 to 4.00 units per acre with density to be determined by development requlations. This request lie~ on a 0.1 acre ~arcel ~ronting approximately 50 feet on the west line of Courthouse Road, approximately 150 feet north of Sunset ~ills Drive. Tax Map 38-1~ (1) Part cf Parcel 1 (Sheet 1~). In Clover Hill Magisterial District, requested a Conditional Use to permit two (2) O~tdOOr adver- tising signs in an A~riou!tural (A) District. The density of ordinance standards. ~ne Comprehensiv~ Plan designates the property for residential use of 1.51 tc 4.00 unit~ per acre with ~enslty to be determined by develotz~ent regulations, This requemt lles on O.1 acres fronting i~ two (2) places for approximately 25 f~t each on the west line of Csurthouse Road and al~o ~ronting in two (2) places for approximately 80 foot each on the north and south lines Of S~nsot Hills Drive, and located in thc northwest end southwest quadrants e~ the intersection of thesu roads. T~ ~ap 38-11 (1) Part of ~arcols 9 and 13 (Sheet 14). Mr. Jacobsen presented a summary of Oases 91SN0113 and 91SN8114 concurrently noting that tho Planning Ocn~nissio~ recommende~ denial of Case 9laN0113 to permit u temporary advertising ~ign fo= the ~uf0division but approval of case 91~N0114 ~or permanent entrance type signs identifying the Brandon nubdivX$ion, ~ject to c~rtain condition=. ~. ~ican noted that al~cugh beth cases could be discussed 91-144 2/27/91 Mr. Doug ~radb~ry, representing the applicant, did nat the Planning commission's recommendation on Cass 9laN0113 he felt the temporary sign was necessarY to attract public attention to the availability of housing in the Brandon S~bdivieion. He stated ~he planning comissicn's reco~endatio~ with respect to Case 91SN0114 was acceptable. Ms. Terrl Guthrie, a resident of Brandon Subdivision, representative for the Brandon Civic Assoeiatlcn and a real estate agent for the e~bdivi~ion, voiced support for the proposed requests es she felt the si~n was necessary in order to adegua~ely identify and advertise the 6%%bdivt~ion and submitted p~titions and letters in favor Of the requests, which copies are ~ila~ with the papers of this seard. George Emerson voiced Support for the proposed signs as he felt these t~Ds~ of sign~ assiste~ =h~ sale of homes a~d thereby would improve the County's economy- Mr. George for iuture requests of this natuxe by others. ~r. cnrrin staked he felt the reguest was unusual in nature and, if approved, the precedent set would no~ be too ~evere. After brief discussion, it was on motion o~ ~. Applegata, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, resolved to deny Case 91SN0113; further, it was r~solved ~u approve Case 915N0114, ~ubje~t to the following conditions: 1. Until such time that Courthousu RO~d i~ widened, a single sign identifying ~ran~on Subdivision shall be not to exceed thirty-two (32) square ~uut in urea. The colors u~ed in this sign s~all ~ earth tones and blend with the surrounding area. Only one [1) outdoor udver- tieing sign shall be permitted on this parcel. T~e area o~ this Sign ~hall be counted as part of the total Within sixty (60) ~ays o£ ~he completion of the Court- huusu Road widening, the sign identified in Condition 1 shall be xemoved and two (2] permanent signs may bo erected, each not to exceed twenty (20) square feet in area. such signs shall be mounted on brick ornamental walls and shall be restricted to identify Bra/idea subdi- vision. Further, except where specified helein, such signs shall comply with the applicable requirements Sections 21.1-2~5, 21.t-166 and 21.1-267 (j) of Zoning 0rdina~lce. (C~C) Board discussion ~ns~ed relative to the history o~ both requests; the necessity for the signs and the p~rp0sos they wool4 serve; the length of time the existing signs had been located at thi~ cite; whether or not the sign~ were an precedent if the rc=quust Were approved; etc. Mr. Applegate restated his motion, ~econded by M~. S~llivan, tO deny Case 91SNOll~. And further, Mr. A~legato reeta~ed his me,ion, Seceded by ~r- gullivan, to approve dase 91~0114, ~ubject to the fellowlng conditions: 1. Until such time that Courthouse Road is widened, a single sign ideatliyiag Bra~on $~_b~ivi$i~n shall be permitted net to excee~ thirty-two [32) ~guare feet in area. The colors ues~ in ~his sign shall ~u earth tones a~d blend with the zurro~nding area. Only one (1) outdoor adver- tising sign shall ~u p~rmi~d on ~h£s parcel- The area of this sign shall be counted as part of the total aggregate for all signs permitted on this property. 91-145 2/27/91 2. Within sixty (60) days of tko completion Of the Court- house Road widening, the sign i~entified in Condition 1 shall be removed a/%d two (2) permanent sign~ may be erected, each not to axo~ed ~we~ty (20) sq~nare feet in area. such si~n~ shall be mounted on brick ornamental walls and shall be restricted to identify Brandon vision. Further, except wheze s~ecified herein, such si~n~ shall ce~ply with the applicable requireJ~ents of See:ions 21.1-265, 21.1-265 and 21.1-267 (j} of the Zoning Ordinance, (CPC) Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, ~Lr. Applegate and Mr. Mayes. ~ey~: Mr. Currin. Absent: Er. Daniel. In Bermuda Magisterial District, ~PPO~ATTO~ TRUST requested an 4t~endment to Conditional Use Planned D~velo~nt (Cas~ to ~it a ~rrow pit in a ~eneral Industrial {M-2) Distri==. ~e density of such ~en~ent will be contzulle~ by zonin~ conditions cz 0rdi~a~ce staRdards. The Co~prehensiv~ Plan ~esignates the property for i~4uS~ria! u~ with density to determined ~ development re~lations. ~iz r~st lies on a 36.46 acrs parcel fronting in two (2) Dlaoes for approx~ately 920 feet o~ ~hu north and ~o~th lines of Touchstone Road, ~ap 150-10 (1) ~art o~ Paro~l 3 (sheet 42). conditions; b== noted the applicant ~id not wi~h =~ conduct the a~Chae~logical ~dy as Mr. Currin di~el¢$ed to the ~oard ~hat, at one time, h~ a ~all Dortlon of the s~ject ~ite but Ruither he nor his real ~state office uuIrently had any financial int~re$% i~ the property; therefore, he did not feel a collier of ~nturest e~isted re~atlve to this case and he c~uld vote o~ Mr. Jef~ Collins, representing the applleant, acceD=e~ th~ PlaRnlnq Co~issio~ rec~endatio~; u~ressed concern relative to the cost of an archaeological study and tho ~=c= on the s%gni~ic~ finds; noted that a condition r~iring archaeological study was not p]ac~d on the original zoning of the s~jec% property and ~urrounding area; and stated the applicant ~id act feel that the fi~ncial burden of such a survey should b~ placed on th~m, Mr. George Beadle~ voice4 support for t~ condition r~iring the archaeological Study and suggested that a time l~it Dialed on the borrow pit use. On motiO~ of Mr. Cardin, seconded by Mr. Maycs, th~ Board approved Ca~9 91SN0tlS, s~juct to the follow~g peri~ ~o= =o exceed ten {10) years from da=e of approval of this ~1.1-195 (b) of the ZOning Ordinano~, (CPC) (N0~S: a) This us~ is in ad4i~ion ~u the uses Debitted b~ Condi- tion 5 of Ca~ $7S174. 91-146 2/27/91 b) c) d) Ayes: Mr. ~ullivan~ Mr. Absent: Mr, Daniel. The~e ~onditioes are in addition tc conditions cf approval for Case 87s174. Ail conditior~ cf zoning approval for Case 87S174 remain in effect. Prior to any land disturbance, a site plan must be submitted for review and approval.) Currin, Mr. Apple~ate and Mr. 90S~0281 amend~lent to Conditional Use Planned D~velopment (Case will be controlled by zonin~ ~ondit~ons o~ Ordinance stand- ard~. The Comprehensive Plan debt,nates the p~op~r~F for ~he ~ortheast line of Thir~ Avenue, approx~a~ely a25 feet ~Gt ~SA (Sheet 54). had received ~urteen [14) letters of 0~o~ition ~o the relate to th~ proposal, ~4 staled the Pl~n~ co~ssi0n recs~end~ denial. ~. Oliver Rudy, r~p~ese~tin~ the applicant, e~lained propose~ ~en~mnt is to allow tr~sfer of ownership and operating rights due to f0~uclosura, noted that staff had reco~ended approval of the re~est as there were co~itions reco~ende4 ~t w~uld address land gee con~r~ regardless of structure could be ~sed for housing sgu~e~ts f~om Virginia S~atm University, ~d state~ there should be some means Mr. L. ~ace ~s, broker for LQ~S Soft,ge COmpany, briefly e~lgined how his ~ien~ a~ired ~e s~j~ct outlined improvements ~ade to th~ Dro~rt~ ~d st~ct~e; stated it was not financially ~aasiblg for hi~ client to ~rove a~ sell the property as it ~urrently N~. Mayer stated xepres~ntaSives ~or Virgule State Univeralty students o~ any other use and feel it~ continue~ use will oppose the re~e~t as they feel it adversely i~paG~s t~eir ~Q~ ~o ta~lr ~o~ty; ~ha~ he had ~oBcer~s now tee structure would b~ use~; ~d he c~ul~ not ~es~ions were raised relative to the ~t~le of the existing structure, the n~er 0f rooms i~side, avail~le facilities sad/or p~lic utilities; what would hap~n if the property 91-147 2/27/91 were downzened; how the building could be used; ets. Mr. Mayes indicated a duplex or triplex may be a more appropriate usa for the subject property tha~ a boarding house. OD ~otie~ of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegat~, the Board denied Case 90$N02$~- Ayes: Mr. sullivan, ~L~, Curtis, Hr. Applegate and Mr. Mayea. Absent: ~r. Daniel. 91SN0123 In Bermuda Magisterial Distriot~ NINA ~HOOSMI~t requested reze~ing from Heavy Industrial {M-3] to Hea~Tf Industrial with Conditional Us~ t0 p~it a ~r~na. ~e ~nsi~y of Such standard. ~e Comprehensive Pi~ designates th~ DroDerty for gums=at i~ustrial use an~ 1OO ypaz flo~pl~n with density ~ d~te~ined by development repletions. This re.est lies line of Bellwood Road, appro~ately 2,900 ~eet east o~ Seven Avenue. T~ Map 68-6 (2) Bellwood Fa~s, ~uts 17C, 19, 2Q ~d 21 and T~ ~p 68-10 (2) Bellwood Fa~s, Lots 18 and 19 23). Plan~i~g C~ission reco~end~ approval, s~ject to c~rtain conditions and acceptance of t~e a~plicant's conditions. ~. oliver D. Ruby, rupr~s~igg the applic~t, stat~ the ~. Georpa Beadles stated he opposed the doyle adver=isin~ of ~is r~est for p~lic hearing by bo~h the ~la~ing that an archaeolu~iual s~vey wa~ not re~ired on a previous contracted to purchase fill ~t~rial ~rom :his si~u for approved Ca~e 91S~011~, m~je~t tc the following condltions: 1. In addition to the uses pe~itted by right or with xestxicti0ns within Hea~ Industrial (I-3) Dis~ricts, marinas shall ba permitted. 2. In conjunction with ~ite pla~ s~issio~ for development existing borrow pit, a class 1 ~chaeological pr~pare~ ~y a permon accep=~le to =h~ Virginia m~nt of ~isturlc Resources, shall be su~itted to the Planning Depar~ent. I~ the ~IV~y r~veal~ a~y can= finds, as ~e~ined by %h~ ~lanning D~par~nt, ba~ed o~ Sectio~ 106 of the National Preservation Act~ for approval at which t~e conditions may be ~Do~d eithe: ~rotect mi~fic~t fiads or provide for their removal to an accept~lu location. (P) 3. At such time that th~ ma=i~ is utilized ~ anyone ether around the perimeter o~ the marina bamin. The re~ired landscaDin~ ma~ De installed in phases. The ~c~ and the phasing of installation shall be approved by the marina. 91-148 2/27/91 And further~ the Board accepted tho following conditions: t~ Prior to obtaining a building ~ez~it, one of ~he follow- inq ~hall be accomplished for fi~e protection: A. For building per. its obtained on or before $~ne 30, 1991, the owner, developer or ~ssignoots) ~hall pay floor area. If the building permit is obtained a~=er June 30, 1991, the ~oun~ of th~ r~q~ired payment shall be adjusted upward er downward by the same percentage tha~ %he ~arshall swif~ ~uil~ing Co~t Index increased or decreased b~tween June 30, 1991, and the date u~ payment. With the approval of the County'm Fire Chief. the o~er, developer a~si~ee ( z ) shall zeoeiv~ a ~r~it tuwar~ re~ire~ pa~emt for the cost of an~ fi~e sion s~st~ not othe~ise re.ired by law which include~ as a part o~ the OR st~tially ~eduees the ne~ ~or County for the additional ~ire protection measures ru~i~ed by this pro~er is g~nerated solely ~y ~his 2. ~riox %o site plaa approval, thirty-five (55) ~eet right of wax on the no~th side of Bellwo~ Roa~, measured ~ro~ the centerlin~ of ~ha~ part o~ Bellwood Road adja- cent to the p~ODerty, ~hall be dedicated fre~ ~d un- restricted, to an~ ~or the b~n~fit 0f Chesterfield Co~ty. (N~: Site plan~ must be s~mitted for review ~d approval.) Aye~ Mr. Sullivan, Mr. C~rin, Mr. A~plugat= a~ Mr, ~yes. 91SN0125 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, BKTT~-A~KCLAHKi~ON requested amendme~ to Conditional Umes {Cases 80Sl&3 and 82s088) relative to o~atinq rights o~ a child day care cen=er. The ~ensity of such ~t will De controlled by zoning conditio~ or Ordi~nce ~ta~d~ds+ ~e Comprehensive Plan d6~i~ates ~he ~r~Der~ ~or p~liu/~emi-p~llc us~ with density to be d~te~ined by d~velo~ent radiations. ~im re.est lies in an Agricultural (A) Dis=fiat on a ~.74 acre parcel fronting approx~ately 820 feet on the nor~ line of Academy Drive, approx~ately 80 ~eet east of Con~ey ~dge Drive. T~ Map 38-10 (1) Parcel I (Sheet 14), ~la~i~g Co~i~sion race.ended approval of the re.est, s~j~o% to a singl~ tonal%ion. 91-149 2/27/91 Hr. George Beadles expressed concern relative te doubl~ a~vertisi~g of the request and approval of the proposed operation with utilization of Septic b¥~tum and well. Mr. Peele ~ote~ the Eealuh Department had indicated the existing septic system and well were designed for a private school which previously eecupied the building and are adequate to serve the ~roposed day care center. ~hen asked, Mr. foot from the nearest pul~lie water line and 350 feet from the nearest sewer line, therefore, Dublic water and sewer were not required at this time. On motion of Mr. Applega~e, seconded b~ Mr. Curri~, th~ Board approved Case 91SN0125, s%tbject to the following conditiun: With the approval of this request, Condition 1 Of Case 89S163 shal~ be deleted. (NOTE: Ail ether cenditiens of zoning approval for Cases 80S163 and 8~S08g, relative to the o~elatien of the day care center, r~ain in effect.) Ayes: Nr, Sullivan, Mr. Currin, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Absent= Mr. Daniel. 91SN~127 ~ Clover Bill Magisterial Diatrlc~, WILI~TA~B. AND~DU~AL ~equested r~zoning from Office Business Io) 'to Corporate office (0-2). The density ef sunh amen~nt will be controll- ed by zoning conditions or Ordi~anu~ standards. ~he Compre- hensive Pi~ d~si~ates the DroDert~ ~or office u~e with density to be dete~in~d by develo~ent re~!a~ions. ~is re,est lies o~ a 0.86 acre parcel ~ronting aDproxi~tely 150 north o~ ~rovlnceto~ Drive. T~ Map 28-4 (9) Cloverleaf West Planning Co~ission reco~ended aDproval. ~r. Kevi~ McKe~ey, representing the ~ppticant, stated the reco~endation was aooept~le. ~hls proce~m ~ On m~tion of Mr. A~legate, seconded by Mr. C~rrin, the Board Ayes: Mr, Sullivan, Mr. currin, Mr. ADD!e~ate and Mr. ~sent: ~. D~iel. The Board recessed until 6:00 p.m- a= which time they would reoonvene at the Waq~er Building fer a joi~t dinner meeting with the Co--unit¥ ~ervi~es a~d social services ~oaxds. ReConvenin~= Mr. Sullivan in=reduced ~r. Charles Ouaiff who gave the invecatio~. Introductior~ were made of the~e ~resen~ ~nd dinner was served. 2/27/91 Board ex-pressed appreciation for the opportunity ts meet with the Board of $~pe~vi$o~s ~ premented a brief update on the Community Services Board's ongoing activities. Johnson pxesented an overview of proposed budget reductions and thei[ i~pa~ on the ability of the Com~u:ity ~oard to meet its criteria and service demands~ outlined r~ductioas a~ asked ~ha~ th~ Board consider approval of $108,500 of funding ~ur critically needed ~$. Mary Batten, Chair~rmon of the Social Services Board, trends; Ms. Meg Donovan~ who outlined agency meeds; Charles Q~ai~ and MS. Mildred ~cker, who highlighted special progr~ services r~c~ntly implemented. ~e Board ~xpresa~d its appreciation for the opDort~ity meet with m~ers o~ ~hm Co~ity Semites Boar~ and social Services Board; agreed the presentations were well-prepaIed; the high ~ality Serviceg the~ render to the citizun~ 0f the County~ indicated budget reductions were meriou~ly would take their re~es=s i~to con~i~era=ion deliberations. On motion of Mr. Applegate~ seconded by Mr. Ceftin, =he ~oazd adjourna~ ~% 7:30 p.m. (~T) until 1~=8~ Noon on March 13, 1991. Ayes: Nr. Sullivan, Mr. C~rri~ Mr. ADDleqete and Mr. Maye=. Absent= Mr. Daniel. L-aHe B. Ramsay ~ / County Admiaigtrator 91-151