Loading...
04-10-91 MinutesI BOARD OF SUP~,'L~::IR5 I,~NIITE$ APRIL I0 r Mr, M. B. Sullivan, Chairman M~. G, H. Applegats Mr. ~arr~ G. Daniel Mr. L&ne B. Ramsey County Administrator lggl ~taff in Attenchqnce: Ms. Barbara Bennett, Dir,, Cfc. on youth M~. Gilty A. Bland, Registrar MS. Jane Car~e:, Dir. of Ma. Amy Davis, Asst. to Co. Admin. Mrs. Qori~ De~ar~, Asst. Co. Leqis. Sv~$. and I~tergov~rn- Affairs Mr, William Assessor Ms, Joan S, Dol~zal, Clerk to thc Board Fire Department ~r. Bradford S. Deputy Ce. Admin., Mr. William H. Howell, Dir., Pkanning Mental Health/Retard. MS. Mary Leu Lyle, DeDuty CO. Admin., Mr. Jacob W. Mast, Jr. Nursing ~om~ Transp. Direstor 7Lt. Richard McElfi~h, Dir., Env. Eng. D~pt. ~ra. A~line Mc~uire, Mrs. Pauline Mitchell, Dir., News & Public Col. J. E. Pittman, Jr. Chief of Mr. Richard Sale, Deputy Co. Admin., Ms. Jean Smith, Diz,, Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr., Dr, Robert Wagenknecht, Dir. o~ Libraries 91-217 4110/91 Mr. David Welehons, Dir. o~ Utilities Mr. Frederick Willimr Dir. of Human M=. Sullivan called the regularly scheduled meeting to order ab 2:00 p.m. (DST) in the Administration ~il4i~g Conference Room IRoQm 5021. 1. WORK SESSIO~ Mr. Rmmsey crated the purpeee of the work session was p/evide tho Board with additional information regarding the proposed FY199t-92 budget relating to a~d~0acks, ~eductiom$ and funding options. (A copy of which is ~iled with th~ paper~ of this Beazd.l Mr. Sullivan mubmitted an amended list of his ~e Moar~ m~ers outlined individual propmmal~ for ~eneratin~ revenue sorcim b~ reducing th~ ~neral Fun~ Capital elimination of th~ Co~ittee ~n ~h~ ~ the resexve for 'the 9-L~l ~, reduction of the R~serv~ for Revenue Contin~ncles, z~ducti~n in conferences ~d training, ~liminatlon of tke County conki~qe~cy F~d and a~inimtrative to 5 percent which ~uld ba witkim the par~zs of khm revenues for allocation to th~ D~ ~o~r~, Social for the ~lderly, p~lic safety, ~ar~e~c~ MeScal Services - ~hase III, Qonti~tion of the Sprin~ vacu~ lea~ collection, r~duce one County holiday; etc. After a brie~ dis~ussi0n, it was ~enerally a~ze~d ~o the ~urren~ t~ rate at $1.09, as th~ current fiscal year and There was length~ disc~ion relative to proposed reductions/ levels and revmnue rmsources; industrial access roads a~d/or a~omplisk the Ft. Darlin~ project wiLhin existing budqet a~ the County Con~iagen~ ~ds, the ~plumentation of an increase in the franchise fee fr~m 3 ~u 5 ~cent ~ating a t~ incr~as~ to Co~ty residents as the c~le company would pass on the increase in cust~er fees, study increased and/or =~ditio~al recreational ~ees to offset m~nditures~ free refuse collection or c~a~ge a reason~le ~ee; additional ~e Boar~ generally agreed on ~ach item that was to be Ea=h i%~ r~qaz4ing th~ Co~ity COntracts Li~t for Fiscal Year 1992 [Donations) was reviewed pertaining to the ~92 contribution ~d the Co~ty A~strator'u Contracts List was agzuud to fur Fiscal year 1992, as I% was generally'm~eed to recess for five (5) minutes. Mr. Daniel suggested as a proposed revenue snur=e the elimination o~ the balance o~ ~he Reserve ~er Revenue Discussion ensue~ as to the use of said funds a~ after t~chnieal adjustments, it was agreed that said funding be provided for public safety staff (police and fire) which line items we~ $t>eci~ically addressed. T~r~ was also some clarification regarding funds for Social S~rvie~ and ~Lr. Daniel r~est~d that data relative to the ~ended budqet source~ ~d u~e~ be provided Drier to the evenin~ meeting. prsparation of thc budget. o~ reductions resultin~ in a savings o~ ~ing in =he of $330,00~ identified within %he School A~inimtration budget, whi=h include~ ~ increaee in rental f~s, ~o cha~ge i~ a~i~trative salaries, ~dj~s~ents in indurate rates, adjus~ents o~ projected st~ent enrol~ent ior the upc~ing school year, decreas~ use of trailers, ~. ~sey indicated that Risk ~g~nt charges to School Board could ~ re~uc~d by $400,000 by holding the rate ~he s~e a~ thi~ ~ear~ providing th~ School SYst~ with a total of $7]0,000 wlthi~ ~he S=hool B~ge% that could be reallocated. Mr. Sullivan read a letter ~rom M~S. Copela~d ~elative to approval of a resulution from ~he School Boar~ re,eating authorization of internal berrying in the ~ount of $4,525,000 and up to $L5,000,000 as aee~ud ~o m~t capital project obligations ~til the next bo~ sale; thc source of naid loan ~ing Zrom =h~ Co~ty'~ capital projects r~allocation of said fun~s ~r~ the bond f~d~ c~rently allocated to the D~i~ sa~e~y capital pruj~s to the school capital projectE~ the cash ~low status as of Nove~er, ~998 compared to the current cash flew status; =he sizing o~ 1990 bond is~ue and its ~pact on the current budget; the ~tatu~ o~ school capital projeats~ los~ of interest on fun~s; cash ~rawd~s fr~ bon~ f~dn being ~end~d faster than anticipated due to accelerated completion ~ projects; provide the nece~a~ f~z; anticipa=ed recovery of ~he berried funds; etc. Dr. Davis indicated th~ school s~zt~ wa~ ~ot he, nd ~n fundin~ was accelerated due to e~ly completion of a~d O~tlin~d ~ach project. ne~ty for =he borrowing ~r~ ~e ~15,000~000 ~und and stat~ it appeared a Board pape~ was necess~y to authorise the loan to meet the propect obligations. ~sey di~=ributed and e~lai~d in d~tail all th~ backgro~d di~us~i0~ of interes~ earned, project ~omp!e~io~ original schedules, savings to o~sut interest, co~t Of EC/AC, etc. Mr. Daniel ~=ated he was uncomfort~le with m~ing decisions of this me, rude without s~stantial, current financial data and analy~ but h~ would a~ree ~ ~thorization of the internal borrowing i~ order to meet the b~n within the par~%er~ of the approprLation but were not within the par~eters o~ the cash ~1~ schedule and h~ aid not want to see this scar a~ain. He ~tated according to Boaz~ and the Cowry A~iaistrator should do this tQ insure a~a~e~ he ~el~ ataff had p:ovided tbs info~ation avail~lm 91-219 4/10/91 although it was net exactly that which the Board had rec/uested and ~hat when i~suos of this nature oeeurre~ there should be better ¢o~u/%ication and cooperation between both Boardm in efforts tO resolve them. Mr. Mayas stated he felt %here was a clear delineation of the available funds frc~ the bond~ and interest for the projects, that if the funds are not available the~ cannot be spent and that the School Administration nhould understand this. A£teE further discussion, the Board generally agreed to addrese the borrowing ~seun at the meeting later in tho evening and that the ~cheel Administration should provide detailed, s~ructured financial information (d~tailed schedules, project lists, completio~ da~e~, sources of revenue, etc.) to the Board by next week and prior to decisions on such issues being made in thc future. 13-F- EXKC~'ri~E SESSI(~ On mctio~ of Mr. Coffin, ~eeor~led by Mr. Applegate, the Board w~nt i~to Executive Seamier, purs~an~ ~o Section (al(l), Code of Virginia, 1950, as ~und~d, for diEcu~mion Albert M~ag~r. Reconvening: On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board adopUed the following reaolution: W~R~w%M, the Board of Superviaor~ has this day adjn=rned into Executive Session in accordance wiuh a formal vote of the ~oard, a~ i~ accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Freegcm of I~fozmation Ac~ effective July 1, 19§9, provides ~or certification that such Executive Seasion was conducted in conformity w~th law. NOW, ~FO~, BE IT ~SOL~ =hat the Board of m~er's kn~l~dge, i) only p~lic business matter~ law~ull~ Information Act w~re discusaed in the ~ecutive Session to which =his c~rtification aDDling, and ii) only much p~ic b~$in$$$ matt~r~ ag were identlfisd in the Motion by which the Executive session was convened were h~ard, dlscusmed considero4 ~ tho Board. No me,er dissents from ~is certification. ~u Board being Dolled, the vote was as Mr. Daniel: Mr. Mayer: Aye. Mr. AppleqAte: Aye. MX. C~rrin: Aye. ~. ~ullivan: Aye. 2. DINN~ The Board recessed at 5~00 Nowlett's Tavern for dirtier. p.m. (DST) to travel to John 91-220 3. INVOCATI(HI ~vens I~ep~ndent Methodist Church, who gave t~e invocation. Fir. Ramsay 1sd the Pledge of United grates of ~erlca. Allegiance to the Flag o~ ths 5. APP]:~0~v'2~L ~ ~NlYt'ES 5.A. MARCH 27, 1991 0H motion of Mr. A101~legute, s~cond~d by Mr. Daniel, the Board aDDroved the minutes of ~rch 27, 1991, as s~itt~. Vote: Unan~ous 5.B. APRIL 3, 1991 On motion of Mr. Applegate~ se¢onde~ by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the minutes el April 3, 1991, a~ Z%Lb~itted. Vote: Mr. Kamsey introduced Ma. Pauline Mitchell who pre,anted the Board with a recently publimhed broth%ire in recogrlition of National Ceunt~ Gevernmen~ Wee~ (A~ril 7-13, 199t] which was financed by a grant from Signet Batik. She also indicated a video from the National Association of ~ounties was being shown on Storer; ie available in her o~fice for other use~ and would ~e part o~ Me,el County Government Day, as well as orientation for new County smployee$. ~_r~ Ra~ congratulated Ms. Mitchell on her recent recognition by the Virginia Press Women with ~ award ~0r outstandiag c~ni%~ relations at their annual meeting. Mr. Daniel stated he attended the School so=rd Liaison Committee meeting dealin~ with projects moving fester than the financing schedule which the county had ability ~e fund as well as a rate schedule for facilities which has seconda:~ effects on the Parks and Recreation Department; earl~ retirement; and funding scheduled for 1988 bond projeetE. He relative to the budget. Mr. Mayas ~tated he attended the Education Advisory committee to the Council on Information M~nagement which dealt with obtaining classified positions in education institutions to support teaching of teleco~nications and infcrmatiom Mr. Currin stated he a=tende~ a dinner meeting he,ted by A~DICQ regarding s~eking buzi~e~z &~d industry to participate with A~ICO from the private ~eetor; ~he Board Liaison Ce~ittee ~eting~ and a meeting sponsored by tho ~OOnO~i¢ Development Department for all major industries in which to let them know of the C©~ty'$ i~teze~t in th=iz well-heiag and offer of ass±arenas. 91-221 4/10/91 ~, ~UlliVa~ sta~ed, in addition to some of those meetings mentioned, he attended the Virginia Pepar%ment of Transpertation's Primary A~ocation Hearing and made a statement for primary projects. 8. RE~STS TO POSTPONE A~'~10~, ~G~C"f ADDITIC~S OR C~AN~S IN ~ ~ZD~ O~ ~RES~fATION On motion of Fir. Applegate, seconded by 51r. Daniel, the Board deferred indefinitely, Item ll.A., Resolution Receg~izi~ Ms. Rossie Titocmb, Lucy Corr N~rsing ~ome; added Item 13.A.~.d., Set a Public ~earing D&te to Consider L~asing a 2,5~Q Square Foot Parcel an~ Aecees Road at Manchester Fire ~ouZe No. 2 to Richmond Cellular Telephone CO~a~ and Authoriz~ E:{~cntion of a Lease Agreement, Au=horization for Richmond C~llular to Pile a Zoning Application; added Item 13.~., Resolution Reallocating Funds to ~chool C&Dital Projects, which will fellow item 15.A.9.; and deferred %uatil May 8, 1991, I~em t3.C.1., A~thoriza:ion to Exercls~ ~ineut Domain for the Acquisition of ~asements for the Physic Hill Elevated Water Tank - Thomas J. Smith, et als., an~ a~epted th~ agenda, as amended. vote: unanime=s 9. RF-~OLuTi~ANDSpECIALRECO~NITI~ 9.A. ~CC~IZ/I~G~iIL 18, 1991 ~ DA~~ On motion of th~ Board, th~ ~oll~ing zesolutiom was a~opted; ~, P~lic tz~sit and rldusharing aI~ ~ntiat ele~eRts o~ the ~reater Ric~ond Metropclit~ ar~a's transportation ~mtem and the Co~ty of Chesterfield mean~ to move people in an efficient, reli~le and safe ~AS, P~lio ~r~sit an~ rideskaring 91ay a vital role in the i~ov~ent of air ~alit?~ %he reduction of congestion, creating and preservin~ jo~s, an~ economic co~uni~ dcvelo~nt; and ~S, P~lic transit and rideaharing Drovide mobility for ~'tr~zpor~a~iun depend~t~"-~th~ poor, ~he young, the dls~led and the elderly; and ~, P~lic transit and rides~ring services should be vi~ as viable oo~n~nts of Stat~ and looal planning and design processes; ~d ~E~AM, Continuud coo~rution b~eUn tho ~lic and ~rivate sestors in the provision of p~lic tra~it and ridesharing services should be stressed. NOW, ~EREFO~ BE IT ~SOL~, that the Chesterfield county Board of supervisors does hmreby re~o~ize April 1991 ~s ~'Greuter Ric~ond Rid~shar~ Day" in th~ Greater Ric~ond M~trcpolit~ area and call~ its si~i~ic~ce to the ett~nti0n of all o~ citize~. Mikell, of Ritu~ind=rs, ~d co~und=d th~ org~ization on its effortE to benefit the 8o0n~ and 8nviro~en=, no= only for Chesturii=ld, but the entire region as well. 91-222 ~/lO/gl 9.B. I~KCOGNIZIBGW~E~OF ~P~IL ,~4-28, 1991 AS "AME~ICAN~C~E 0n mOtiOa O~ the ~. Ap~legat~, ~econd~d by Mr. Currin, the Board adopted the following ~E~AS, ~uric~s enjoy mere political and freedom than any other people on earth, this great Nation known the world over as the land of liberty; and ~E~AS, ~e right Of all ~ricans to own, use transfer pri~ate Droperty~ and ~n p~tic~lar thei= o~ home, is a lundeen%al pxin=iplu oi our demo=racy; and eoonomy; promotes citizen i~V01v~unt in neig~orhood and co,unity affairs and greater partioiDa=ioa in our gover~ent at ~11 ievelu; and of hum=s for ~eople, ~usiness and industry, as well as a week for all ~ericans to reflect upon the fuad~ental values of property o~srshi9 an~ its importance to our s~iety~ and ~E~AS, ~e Rice,nd Association of Realtors and o~l~Drate our constitutional freed0~ to o~ real property, and ask all citizeD$ in our =o~ni~y to join in reaffi~ing this ~a$io ~ree~om. NOW, THEREFO~ BE IT ~SOL~, that the Chesterfield County Board of $~pervi$0=~ does hereby recognize April 14-28~ 1991 as "~erican Ho~e Week" and asks all citizens Chesterfield CQu~ty tO joi~ with the Ric~und Asso~iation of Realtors and its m~ers in setting aside this time to remind ourselves ~ha~ we are a fr~e Deo~l~ endowed with the right to own real property and ars ~iven the responsibility to that right. Vet=: Unanimous It wam noted the resolution would ~e presented to the Ric~ond 10. ~R~NG$ OF CtT~Z~S ~ UN$C-~.~.3LED ~A'IT~KS OR CLAIMS There were no hearings of eltizens on uus=he4uled matters er claims. ll.B. F~BLI~ ~EARING TO CONS/DER AN O~D~ANCE TO CODE OF -r~u~ CO%~TY OF C~ESTER~IELDr 1978~_A~. A~ND~D, BY AHENDIBG A~D ~N~%~'~I~ SECTION~ 20-44 AND 20-72 ~T_~TING TO WAT~ AND ~ A.SSE$~ AND Mr. Sal~ ~tated OOnSideration of an ordinance to ~end the Cod~ of the County of Chezt~rfield, 197B, a~ ~ed, by ~e~dihg and reenacting ~ections 20-44 and 10-72 r~la~iBg to water an~ Smwer assessment and d~elopment districts in and time. He briefly e~lained the purpose of the ordinance which would bring the poliGy ~d ordinance in ~ync. su~g=s~ed de,eat until such time as a solutio~ to the problem 91-223 ~/10/91 ~tat0~ h0 f01~ tha~ ~here is no inexpensive way for citizenm %0 obtain water and/or sewer service, and that the County has nc funds available to assist thc residents with the cost involved, There being no one else to address the matter, the public hearinq was closed. There was some discussion relative to all azeau in tho CoUnty being urea=ed equally; the proper way ts approach residents obtaining water and/or sewer service; and the costs associated with it, eec. Mr. Currin indicated he had suggested the ordinance be drawn, but after reviewing it did not feel comfortable wLth this approach but that there is a problem that exists which needs tu be solved. Mr. Applogate indicated he did not feel it appropriate for a cloud to be placed on the title cf people's property i~ they would not want public utilities. on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Beard denied adoption o~ an ordinance to amend the Code of the County o~ Chesterfield, 1978, as ameeded, ~Y amending an~ reenacting Section ~0-44, and 20-72 relating to water and sewer assessment and develol~Uent districts in residentially developed areas. Ayes: Mr, Sullivan, Mr. Currin, Mr. Daniel and zr. Applegato. water and sewer extension that cannot possibly work and that County Administrator was dizemted ~o look into this matter and stated the list of pro, lams should b~ looked at, erased and lt.C. BBIX~ET ISB~E~ ll.C.1. CONSID~ADOPTIONOFPROPOSEDFY1991-1992 B~D~ETAN~ Mr. Stegmaier stated the Board had deferred ~he p~eposed FY1991-1992 B~d~et, and 1992-199S Capital I~rov~ent Progr~ un~il this date amd time ~z~m the A~ril 3, 1991 p~lic hea~iag. He distributed a copy of changes suggested by the th~ proposed budget. On motion o~ the Board, it wa~ re~olved, that the Board adopt th~ PY1991-9~ ~Udget, IGensral and all other ~un~s) as ~mended, in the total a~oant of $409,761,300; and, further, it was resolved that the Board adopt the FY1992-1998 Capital Improvement Proqram, as amended, in the total amount of $254,026,600. ADOPTION OF P.E~OLU~kI~ TO k~ATE I~'NDS F(~ FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992 Mr. Ste~maier stated that although thc Board had adopted thc 1991-92 Budget, a resolutio~ appxopriating funds was neeessarl;. Be ~tated in th~ past the Beard has, for the pas% ten years, wlthhel~ $1 milliun from the schools and the Board 9~-224 4/10/91 may wish to change that te $5 million as well as ad~ress ~endments. On motion of the Board, the following ordinance was adopted: A RESOLUTION TO APPROPtlTATE DESIGNATED FUt~DS AND ACCOUNTS FROM DESIGNATgD ESTIMATED REVENUES FOR ~Y92 FOR THE OPERATING ~UD~gT AND ~ CA]?~TAL IBF~ROV~i~N~ PROGRAM FOR T~E COUNTm/ ~E IT HER~¥ ~SOLVED by the Bomrd of Supervisors of the CoUnty Of Chesterfield~ Il) That ~or the fiscal yea~ beginning on the ~irst day of July, ~99!, and endin~ on the thirtieth day oi June, 19~2, the followin~ sections shall ~a adopted: Sec. 1 The £ollowi~q d~ignat~d funds and accounts shall be appropriated from ~h~ d~i~naLed esLima~ed zev~nu~ to provid~ a capital improvements pre,ram ~or and to operate the Co~tF: G~neral FUnd From 5ocal ~ources Lice~sem, Permitst Fees Fines & Forfeit~rus Other Local Revenue From Oth~r Agencies $=ate, Federal & 0thor Localities County Capital Improvements Rund V.P.S.A. Reserve Anticipated Fund Balance 7/t/91 Appropriations: Clerk to the Boa~d Registrar purchasing License inspector MaGistrate 38,394,900 5,572,100 1,026,000 8,346~000 36,821,600 50,000 600,000 1,t58,70~ 137470r000 254,149,300 199,100 319,500 597,900 566,300 679~900 2,612,~00 299~700 $ 4,465,600 557,800 117,600 1,623?900 1,707,400 277,600 2,031,g0D 915,700 229,900 54,900 14,500 Z,7OO 885,000 91-225 Police Depart~n5 Fire Departnlent Sheriff and Jail Communications Center Human Services Aclministration Human Resource Management News & Public Informa~iun Social Service~ ~ental Health/Mental Retardation/ Libr=~ Parks and Recreation County Fair Coif~%lni~y Development A~inistration Enqineering and Drainage Stxeet Lights a~ Road~ Utility ~ght-of-Wa~ C~pital Projects Fund Balance, 6/3O/92 19,179,900 15~939,900 5,351,40Q 76Q~60Q 1~8,700 637,900 151,500 5~749~700 7,654~200 1,~$5,000 1,561,3s0 3,100 3,565,900 256,S00 25,000 364,900 1,636,3~0 333,6~Q 1~837,300 1,7~3,10o 3,075,400 345,900 1,056,700 32,700 2,053,300* 1,937,Q00 15,590,9~0 124,213,200 13 999 100 25~149,3O0 Includes $757,000 estimated cost of the Tax Relief for the Elderly Pro,ram. School Op~ratinq Fund Estimated Revenues: F~om Local source~ From Other Agencizs State and Federal Gevernment Transfers From the general Fund Total Revenue Al~Propriatiens~ Administration/A & T Operation and Maintenance D~bt Servi~e ~ood Service Total School O~eratiag Fu~d County ~zant Fu~d Estimated Revenue: From the Stats & Federal Government From the General Fund Appropriations: Housing Grant Co~uni=¥ Diversion Incentive Youth Services Victim/witness Assistaac~ Litter Grant $ 2,516,550 B8,776,95~ 11S,650,000 209,943,500 141,911,199 6,575,1~9 8,544,S90 22,617,192 8~391~250 209,943,$00 719,800 94,800 814,600 168,200 89~800 91-226 4/10/91 Pretrial Release Total County Grant Fund 814~600 County C/P Fund Estimate~ Revenue~ Interest Earninqs 5O,0OO Trans£er from Vehicle & Communications Maintenance Fund 250,000 Transfer from Utilities 86,000 Total Revenue 386,000 ~ppropria~ions: Transfer to County General Fund 50,000 County Capital Projects 336,000 Total County CIF Fund 3R6,000 Vehicle and com~unioazicns Maintenance E~timated Revenue: sales Use o~ Retained Earnings Appropriations: CommunicatiOns/Electronics Transfer to County CIP Total Vehicle ~ Communications ~ain=enance Risk Management Fund Estimated Revenue= ~ervice ahar~us Beginning Fund Equity, 07/01/91 Total Revenue Appropriations: Risk Ma~agemant O~erations Ending Fund Equi:y, 06/30/92 Total Risk Ftana~ement Fund County Airport Fund sales Transfer from General Fund Total Revenue Approprlationn~ Airport Total CQUnty Airport Fund County N~r$inq Home Fund Estimate~ Revenue: AppropriatiOnS: Nursin~ Eome Total County Nursing Home ~und Water Water Sarvics Charges Capital Cost Recovery Charges Other Revenue Total Revenues 91-227 3,327,100 310,200 3,637,300 2~908,900 478,400 250t000 ~,637,300 2,197,000 2t40Bt600 4,600,600 2,261,600 2,339,0~0 4,600,600 1,123,500 293,700 30,000 1,447,2~ 1,~7t200 1,447,200 5,533,400 438,400 5,971,800 5,971,800 5,971,8U~ $ 8,212,300 1~519~100 22,60~,500 4110/91 Appropriations: Water operations Water Debt Transfer to Capital Projects A~ to Improvement & R~placement Account Total Water Fund Source cf Fanda: Wastewater seIvio~ Charges Appropriations: A~d to ir~provement & Replacement Account 10,476,900 2,7O9,600 3,312,900 14,012,500 3,915,800 4,797,700 807,100 23,543,I00 8,965,~00 5,440,300 ~l~r20O 13,543,10Q Utility Ca~ital Project~ - Water Construction Bond Interest Transfer from Water Operating Fund Bond Proeeed~ Total Revenue Appropriations= Water Capital Improvements Transfer to County Capital Prujaota Total Water Capital Improvement~ Utility Capital Proj~ctn - Wastewatar Con~t~etion So=roe of Funds: Eliminations & Reductions of Prior Bond Interest Total Revenue Appropriations: W~stewater Capital Improvements A~d to Improvement & Replacement Account Transfer to County Capital Projecta Fund Total Waetew~ter Capital Improvements See attached schedule for project listing. 4,276,300 13,700 3,312~900 3r624~400' 11,227,300 11,184~300 11,227,300 ~0,242,500 155 lOO 1~,397,600 9,547,500 807,109 Sec. 2 Appropriations in addition to these contained in the general appropri&~ion ordinance may be ma~e by th~ Board onl~ if there is availabl~ in the ~enerel fund an unenou~foered and Sec. 3 ~xeep~ as set forth in Sections 7, 1~ and 14, the County Administrator may, as provided herein, authorize the trans~er of any unencun~0ere~ ~alance or portion theroo£ from one classifioation of expenditure to another within the same department or agency. The County Administrator may transfer up to $15,000 £zom the uneneumber~ balance of the appr~priat±en of one department or agency to another encompassed in the Non-Departmental appropriation. No more need for a tranafer, unless the total amount to be transferred 91-2~8 4/10/91 ~ee. 4 The County Administxator may increase appropriations for the following items of non-budqeted ~evenue that may occur ~uring the fiscal year: a. Insurance recoveries received for damage to County have ~en expended to make rapairn. b. Refunds or reimbursements made to the County ~or to that refund er reimbursement. c. Any revenue so~rce not to exceed $15,000. Sec. 5 (a) Ail on%standing eneu~ranc~a~ both operating and capital, at Jun~ 50, 1991 shall be reapprcpriate~ to the 1991-92 fiscal year t~ the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previou~ year. Sec. 5 .th). At the clone Of the fiscal year~ all unencumbered appropriations 2er budge~ items other %hen Capital Projects, grants, and donations restricted to specific purposes shall revert ~o the Fund Balance Available for Appropriation of the fund in which they are included. Sec. 6 Appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall re/%ain appropriations until the completion o~ th= project or until resolution, changer or %liminates the appropriation. Upon out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This neetion applies to all existing appropriations for Capital Projects at June 3Q, 1991 and appropriations in the 1991-92 budget. see. 7 That the county Administrator may authorize the transfer of Utilities Capital Projects funds =hat axe 20% ox up to SlOe,000 oi the originul project cost, which=vet le~s, fxom any Utilities Capital Project to any utilities ca~ital project or to the balance of the water and aec. h That the approval ~y the Board cf supervisors of any grant of funds to the County constitutes the appropriation of both the reuenue to be received from the ~rant and the County'~ ~cp~nditur~ required by th~ terms of the gramt, if any. The appropriation of ~rant funds will not lapse at the end o~ the ~iscal year, but shall remain appropriated until completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate r~solution, changes or ~lL~inat~s th~ appropri- ation. The County Administrator may reduce any du~ing the fiscal yea~. Upon completion of a ~ank project, staff is authorized to close out the grant and Uransfer back to the funding source any remaining bulances. This applies to appropriations for grants on=standing at June ~0, !991 and appropriation~ in the ~991-92 budget. Sec. 9 The County Administrator may appropriate both revenu~ an~ expenditure for ~onatiens ma~e by citizens er citizen groups in support of County programs. Any remaining unencum- anted balance cf a rnstrictea ~onaticn at the end of the fiscal year will be reappropriated into the ~ubsegnent fiscal year. Sec. 10 The County ~dministrator may reduce revenue and expenditure appropriation~ relate~ =o p=ogram~ fu~de~ all or in part by the Commonwealth of Virginia and/or the federal goverru~ent uo the level approved by the responsible ~ate or federal agency. Sec. ll The Director of the Accounting Department is autho- are transfers budgeted. The Director shall transfer funds only as needed up to amounts budgeted, er in accordance with any existing bond recelution~ that specify the manner in which transfers are to bo made. various funds of the County to allow maximum cash flc~ effi- ciency. The advances must not violate county bond covenants or other legal restrictions that would prohibit an advance. expenditures from the following Trust & Agency Funds for the specified reasons for which the funds were established. In no case shall the expenditure exceed the available belance in the fund= a. Nursing Home Patient's Fund b. M. W. Burnett Employee Award Fund d. T. F. Jeffrsss ~emorial Fund e. County Deferred Compensation Fund f. Pension Trust Fund ~e¢. t4 The County Administrator may transfer Worker's funds consistent with the County's Risk Management program to sec. 15 The County Administrator may transfer any amount cf 11.D. CONSIDER AN O~DINANC~ TO F.~T~SI~H T~ AI~IUAL ~AX I~Srf ON VT~LIOUS CLASSES OF PROPE~TYFO~ a'~ COUl~t~f OF C~E~TERFIRLD Mr. Ste~mai~r ~tated the Boaxd had de£ezred consideration an ordinance to establish the annual tax le~ on various classes o~ proper:y for the County c£ Chesterfield until this date end time from the April 3, 1991 public hearing. stated £uzthez the Board had directed staff to pre,are the necem~ary paD~ork to advertise ~or a D~lic hearinq ~or to the elderly and the handicapped which will also reflect adjus~enLs at a later date for those who ~alify under Tax R~lief Progr~. Mr. Applegate stat~ it was his understanding ~e Board would qrant r~lief for the ~Iderly and the handioapped. ~e Board on motion of the Boa=d, the date of May 22, 1~91 a= ~:00 Wa~ ~et ~0r a p~lic he~in~ to consider an ordi~nce relatinq %o tax relief for the elderly and kandicap~d a~d, further, the Boar~ adopted the followin~ ordin~ce: B~ IT 0~A!~D ~ th~ Board of Sup~rvlsor~ o~ th~ County January, 1991, and ending on thm thirty-first day of 1991, the taxes on property in all the Magisterial Districts of the County of Chesterfield shall bm as foll~s: 91-230 4/1~/91 see. 1. ~eal Property and Mobile Momes. on tracts of land, lets er improvements thereon and on mobile h~e~ the tax mhalt he $1.09 on every $100 of assessed See. 2. Personal Property. Ia) on automobiles, ~zailers, beats, boat trailers, other motor vehicles and on all tangible personal property used er held in connection with any mining, manufacturing or other business, trade, occupation or profession, including furnishings, furniture and appliances in rental units, tke t~x (b) On aircraft as defined by Section 58.1-3503 and -3506 o~ the Code of Virqinia, 1950, as amended~ the tar shell b~ $1.i0 on ~v~ry $100 of the assessed value thereoi. (e] On motor vehicles owne~ by msmbe=s of volunteer rescue squads and vO!U~teer fi~e d~partments a~ provided in Section a-13.2, code of ~ Count~ Of Chestez~i.~, 1978, as amended, the tax shall be $.96 o~ ev~-f $100 ef the assessed value thereof. Sec. 3. Publio Servi~e Gorporation Propmrt¥. (a) On that ~ertion o~ real estate and tangible personal property of pttblic service corporations which has been Virginia, 1950, a~ amended, the tax shall be $1.09 on every $100 of the a~see~ed value thereo~ determined b~ the State Corporation Commission. (~) The £oregoing subsections to the contrary notwithstanding, cn uutom~biles and t~ueks belonging te such public service corporations the tax shall be $3.60 oa every $100 of assessed value thereof. Se~. 4. Machinery and Tools. On machinery and tools used in a manufacturing or mining ~ueiness the tax shall be $1.00 en every $108 assessed value thereo~. Vote: Unanimous lt.E. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ~ ='~ CODE O~ 'r~ COUNTY OF IN8 SECTION 8-38 RELATIN~ TO ~R u'rlLITF TAX ~N T~.~oHO~E S~WICK (9-1-1 TAK) Mr. Stegmaier s~ated ~he Board ha~ deferred consideration of an ordinance to ~end the C~e of the County of Chesbekfield, 1978, a~ ~ends~, by ~en~ing an~ reenacting Section 8-38 relating to th~ utilit~ t~ on telephone s~rvic~ (9-~-1 tax), until this date and time from the ~ril 3, 1991 p~lic h~axi~g. H~ i~dicated the increase would be used for replacement e~ipment ~or the 9-1-1 S~stem. 0n motiO~ of the Boa~d, the following ordinance was adoptad~ ~ O~IN~CE TO ~ SECTION 8-38, CODE OF ~E CO~ OF C~ST~IELD, 1978, AS ~, ~LA~ING TO 9-1-1 LOC~ ~C~GE S~VI~ B~ TT O~AI~D by th~ Board of Supervisors of Chegterfield County: 91-231 4/10/91 (1) ~hat Section 8-38 of the Code of the County of Ckesterfield, 1978, a~ amended, is ~mended end reenacted as follows: So~ 8-38. Amount of tax. Pursuant tO the authority sst forth in section ~8.1-351~ of the code of virginia, 1~50, aa a~ended, there is hereby imposed and levied by the county UpOn each purchaser of local exuhange telephone service, a ta~ in the amount of fifty cents ($0.50) per telephone line per month. This tar shall be paid by the purchaser to the seller of local o~ohange telephone servi~ for the use k~/~he county to pay the initial capital, installation and maintenan=e ooa~e and recurring maintenance cos=s of i~s E-911 system. ll.F. CON~/]~ AN O~/)INANCE TO AM~D SECTION 5T~~ ~DE ~ ~ ~ws~ 1978, ~ ~ ~ ~r. Ste~i~= ~ated %he B~ard had de~erred ~nsi~i~n Chesterfield, 1978, ~s ~ended, relating ~o f~ f~r confin~ent o~ ~ogs until this dat~ a~ =~e from the April 1991 p~lic hearing. On motiu~ O~ th~ Board, the following ordinanc~ was ~ O~IN~CE TO ~ ~ECTION 5-5, COD~ 0F ~E CO~ CEESTE~IE~, 1978, AS ~, ~LATING ~Q BE IT O~AI~D by the Board of Su~rvisors oi Chesterfield Co~ty: (1) ~at Section 5-~ of the Code of the County of C~ster~ld, 1978, as ~e~ded, is ~ende~ an4 r99~act~d follows: Sec. ~-8. Confinement and dispositio~ of dogs; pound; reder~ptien ~ o?ner~ pound ~harge~. (b) Any dog confined under any of the provisions of this =hapter m~y be redeemed by its owner at any time after confinement, if such do~ ha~ not been otherwise disposed of under the provisions of this section, upon payment of the pro,er fe~s. NO do~ ~hall be released to an~ person claiming ownerzhi~ u~til proof of current dog li~en~ r~u~ipt or tag and current valid vaccination certificate are pkesented, and by payment to ~he dog warden of a ~e~ in the mmount of thirty dollars (~30.00) if clalmsd during the first twenty-four hours of impoundment and twelve dollars ($12.~Q] a day for each u~dltlonal day thereafter. Funds collected under this section shall 5e disposed of in the same manner as dog license o o o Vote: Unanimous ll.G. Cf~SIDER AN O~DINANCE TO A~END ~CTI~ 7.81-3~ ~ OF · xa~ CO~NT~ OF ~m~.~.~/~/~r.n, ~978, AS A~ENDED, RELATING TO FEES FOR PEP~IT$ ~ DF~L~S OF PRECIOUS ~TALS OR Mr. Stee~aior ~tated th~ Board had d~forr~d consideration of an ordinance to amend ~ection 7.~1-5, Code o~ the County cf 91-232 4/10/91 Cheeterfie!d, 1978, as amended, relating to fees for permits for dealers of precious met=la cr gums until this date time from the April 3, 1991 public hearing. On motion of the Beard, the following ordinance was adopted= AN ORDINANCE TO AME/~D SECTION 7.01-3, CODE OF 'l'~s COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, RELaTInG TO FEES FOR 9~RM~"'~'0R DEALE1L~ OF P~CIOUS ~T~S OR ~ BE IT O~AIN~ by the Board of Supervisors of Chest~rfiel~ County: (1) The= Section 7.01-3 o~ the C~d~ of the Co~ty Chesterfield, 1978, as ~ended, iu ~end~ and reenacted as Sec. 7.01-3. S~e--Method of obtaining. The De.it re~irad herein shall ba issued by th~ chief of police 0r his designee upon Da~en~ o~ a one hundre~ twenty-five doll~ application f~a ~d ~atiafac~ion of the if he ~ati~fie~ the ahi~f of police of hi~ good ohs=attar and t~rpit~de. I~fo~ation r~ir~d on th~ application shall includ~ the applic~t's full n~e, aliases, ad. ess, age, sex ~d fingerprints, ~d the n~e, address ~d t~leph0ne n~er o~ t~e applican='s e~loyer~ i~ ~y, and the location 0f the place o~ business o~ the dealer. ~o license ~hall ~e valid for more than Rix ~o~ths from the date o~ issuance but may be and upon pa~ent of a fee of one h~dred twenty-five dollars. obtaining his permit, than he shall notify the chief of police of any ceasing ox renewing 0f ~usiBu~ o~ ~hang= in l~ca~ion. F~iluru to operate on weekends or holidays shall not construed as a ~asing or disruption. ~e business o~ a dc=let shall ~ c0nduc~ad only from the fixed and per~nent Before a p~it may be i~ued, the dealer must have all weighing dev~s used in his ~us~ness inspected an~ approved by local or state weights and measles officials a~d present written evidence of such aBDroval to the chle~ ~ police. Vote: Unan~ous ll.H. CON~IDERANOI~INANCETOAMEND S~CT~O~ 16.1-4, CODE OF a~ ordinate to ~e~d Section 16.1-4, C~e of the Count~ of chesterfield, 1978, solicitor's permits ~til this date and time fzom the April 1991 p~li~ hearing. On motion of the Board, the followinu ordi~nce was adopted: ~ O~IN~CE TO ~ SECTION 16.1-4, CODE OF ~ CO~ OF CHESTE~IE~, 1978, FEES ~R SOLICITOR~S P~TS BE IT O~kIN~ by the B~ard of SuDervisor~ of Cha~t~field County: 91-233 4/10/91 [1) ?hah Section 16.1-4 of the Code of the county Chesterfield, 1978~ as amended, is amended a~d reenacted as follow$~ A fee o~ twenty-five dollars to sever the costs of investigation o~ the applioa~t and processing of the applicatie~ ~hall be paid to the treasurer of the county when the application iS filed, Vote: Unanimous ll.I. CONSID~ AN ,C~{I)I~ANCE ~ ~ ~ CODE OF =n~ COLr~l~ OF ~n~T~FIELDr 1978~ AS A~ BY A~HNDIN~ A~D HE- MI. StegTaaier stated the Board had deferred consideration of an ordinance tO ~e~d the C~e of the County of Chemturfield, 1978, as amended, by amending and reenacting Eecti0~ 7.2-9 r~tating to e~c~ion and ~edimemt control until ~his date and time from the April 3, 1991 public hearing. He i~dicated th~ ordinance we~ld become effective July i, 1991. On motion o~ the Board, ~he following ordinance w~s C~MT~I~, 1978, AS ~, BY ~IN~ ~ RE~ACTI~G S~CTION 7.2-9 ~TING T0 ~OSION ~ S~D!~ CO~OL BE IT 0~AINED by the Board of ~p~rvisors of Cu~y: (1) Tha~ Section 7.2-9 of Ghapter 7.2 of thu C~= of the curry of Ch~$t~rfigl~, 1978, as ~ended, is ~en~=~ reenacted as follows: Section 7.2-9. Fees. (a) A pro~r~ a~ini~tratio~ fee of one h~dred dollars (~100.00) shall be paid to ~e county at the t~e of filing each eresion and sed~ant CO~ZO1 plun fur I~view co.action with disturbed land areas for uses, other than single f~ily resi~=es, which are less ~h~ tun uhous~d (10,000) s~a~e feet in size. The progr~ a~inistrative fee for single f~ily r~id~ntial uses which are less ~han thousand {10,O00) s~are feet in size shall ~a t~nty-five dollars ($2~.00), NO plan ~hall b~ accapte~ for r~view unle~ acc~Danied by the appropriate fee. (b) A progr~ a~i~istration fee of one thousand hundred ~ollara ($1,000.00) shall be pai~ to %h~ ~ount~ at the t~e filin~ of each erosion and saddest control pl~ for review connectioa with disrobed land areas for use~ which a~e ten thousand (50,000) s~are feet in siz~ or larger. NO shall be accepted ~or review unles~ aceomp~ied ~y this 11.J. CONSIDEl%ANO~II~TOAI~9{DARTic~.~ II~ 14.1-14, ~E OF 'r~ C~ OF ~I~r ~978, ~ ~r. Ste~ai~z sta~ud the Board had deferred c~nsiderati0n of an ordinance to ~e~ Article II, Sectiua 14.1-14, Cods of the 91-234 4/lQ/gl County of Chesterfield, 1978, aa amended, relating te unlawful parking until this date and time from ~he April $, 1991 public hearing. motion of the Boar~, the following ordinance Wes adopted: A~ ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE II, SECTION 14.%-t4, CODE OF THE COUNTY OF C~$TERFIHLD~ 1978, AS A~RDED, RELATING TO UNLAWFUL PARKING BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County~ (1) That Article II, Section 14.l-lA, of the Code of the County o~ Chesterfield, t978, as ~meud=d, is amended an~ zesnacte~ as follow~ Sen. 14.1-14. Unlawful Da:king generally. (a) It shall be unlawful ~or any person to park a vehiol~ on county-own~ or other public property in violation of any e~ the provisions o~ thin s%fo~ectio= (a), and every person receiving w~itt~n notice £:om a ~elics officer that he has committed any of the cffen~e~ hereinafter liste~ may waive right to appoaz and be tried fsl the offen~e set ~orth in the notice. Such waiver shall be effective upon vol~ntarypa~ment of fi£~een dollars {$15.00] to the county treasurer's office within five (5) days after receipt of such notice or upon voluntarily placing ~ifteen dollars ($15.00) in the reply mail envelope on which th~ notice Of violation is printed and mailin~ i~ to the county treasurer's o~ice ~O that it is postmarked within forty-eight I48) booms a~ter r~ceipt Of such Roti=e. Such ~recn shall not hereafter be required to appear before the genmral ~istrie~ co%urt fo: trial upon the charge set forth in ~uch not/ca. Such o~fenses shall isclude parking a vehicle: o O O (b) it shall be unlawful for any ~erson to park a vehicle on private property, including private parking lo~s open to th~ plLbiic a/Id desi~nat~ to accon~odate more than fifty vehicles, in violation of the provisio~s Of ~his subsection (bl and every p~r$on receivin~ written notice from a police e~icer, that he has committed any o£ ~he offenses hereinafter lis~ed, may waive his right to appear and be formally tried ~or th~ offense set forth in the ~otice. $=ch waiver shall ~ffec=ive u~n v01~tary pa~ent off ~i~te~n dollars t0 the co~ty~s treasurer's office within five ~ays after receipt 0f suoh notice or upon voluntarily placing dollars [$i5.O0} in the reply mall envelope on which the notice o~ violation is printed and mailing it to the treasurer's office $o that i~ is pos~a~ed within fiv~ days after receipt of ~uch notice. ~uch person ~ha%1 no~ be thereafter re~ixed to appear before the geneIal district court for trial upon the charge set fo:th in ~uch Such offen=~= Shall in~lud~ Da:king a vehicle: Unanimous ll.K. CONSIDI~ AN 0~DINANCE TO ~ ~K CODE OF x~u~ COUNTW OF C~EbT~i[%uD, 1978, AS AMENDEDr BY' ARENDIN~ A..ND ~/~AcT'rNG $ECTTOM~' 20--13~ 20--34, 20--37~ 20--68, 20--69~ 20-106 ];'~T.~$1"~NG TO [~.~,"-~ ~0~ ~AT~ A~D SERVICE ~r. Sale eta:ed tko Board had deferred consideratio~ of an ordinance to amend Article II, Section 14.%-~4, Code of ~he 91-235 4/10/91 County o~ Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, by amending and reenacting Sections 20-~3, 20-34, 20-37, 20-68, 20-69, and until this date ~n4 time from the April 3, 1991 public hearing. Ks briefly outlined the effect of the proposed changes. Richmond had presented some information relative to this issue which they were unable to address at the public hearing on April 3, 1991 and would like it to be taken into consideration. There was some discussion of deferring the issue until the information could be reviewed; th~ bills being sent out; etc. The Board indicated since there was confusion and the Homehuilders Association did net publicl~ address their concerns, the information suhuitted should at least be considered. 0a motion o~ M~. Applegate, ~eoonded by Mr. Daniel, the Board de~srred consideration of an ordinance to amund %he Cede of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as ~e~ded, by af~ending and reenacting sections 20-23, 20-~4, 20-37, 20-68, 20-69, ~106 relating to ~hmrges for water and wust~w~tur se~vioe until April 24~ 1991 at 9~OO a.m. ~2. ~3BLIC HE~RINC~ ~CTION 7.1-1r COD~ OW ~ COlPNTY OF CH]~.~rl~u~I~r.n~ 1978{ A~ A~DED~ ~TII~ TO x~u~ LOCATIC~ AND tKMOh/kARI~ OF HAGI$- '~'~K/A~ DI~T~XCTS AND VOTIN~ ~R~CINt~ AND T~ LO~ATTO~ OF Mr. Stel Parthemos, Assistant County Attorney, stated this date and time had be~n advertised for a publi~ hearing to consider four alternatlue ordinances to amend and reenact Section 7.1-2, Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, relating to the location and boundaries o~ magisterial di~tri~t~ =nd vo~ing precincts and %h~ looatic~ uf polling places. He stated that evel-f ten ~ears, a~ter the federal census results have been re~erted, counties are required to redraw their magisterial district boundaries to ensur~ tha~ ~he principle of one man, c~e vote is protected; that the Board at its work sessio~ o~ March 19, 1991 proposed four altsrnative redistricting ~lans for conside=ation; and further, that the Boar~ may also consider modifications to the plan~. ~e indicated that o~ce th~ Bcar~ has adopted the redistricting plan, it m=at be sufomittsd to the Department o~ Justice for their review to ensure that the plan is in compliance with the federal Voting Rights Act and that the County would then receive notifioatien from the Department of Justice for approval on the plan before August 19, 1991 which ~s the last day for the Registrar to notify citizens of redistricting changes that affect them. Mr. ~ill Ha/ldley, ~enior Planner, presented an overview of the proposed pla~s; the e~isti~g a~d ~ew redistricting lines~ percentages of ~inority Voting ~tre~ths in each district: etc. concerns ever the impact of the redistricting lines of each exi~tln~ ~istrict~ existing p~rcentagea; percentages oi minority voting strength; the voting precincts ~ost affected by the redistricting process; alternativez t~ Plan B, sro. 91-236 ~r. Willis J. ~radle¥, representing the Civic and Pro§ressiv~ Action Association of Matoaca Magisterial District and a member of the Board of Education Task Force, ~%tb~it~ed a copy of "Analysis Of Chesterfield County ~edis~:iGting ProposalsTM (a copy of which is £il~d with the papers of this Board). indicated ~he Task Force had made an analysis of the redistricting plans and felt the plan relating to the Mat0a¢~ ~agisterial District is unacceptable as the proposed plans fail to ~aximize the BIa~k vote, dilutes the Black vote, and reduces the size of minority voting strene~-h beyond acceptable deviation recommended by the Voting Rights hot of 1964; reguested that the Matches District he restored to a 29% voting minority strength as it was in %980. There was discussion relative ~o Gomparis~ of five districts v~rsus seven districts; a centralized ~bsentee votin~ at the Courthouse; chairman at-larg~ elected bM thc citizens; the proposed ~atcaca District Plan as compared to the other propOSed redistricting plans; th~ slzs of each district, precinct, total population, and Black populabion. Mr. Robert ~arvey, Chairman of Voter Registration for the Chesterfield Branch of the NAACP, in conjunction with members of the Civi~ a~d Pkogressive Action Association cf the Mateaea Magisterial District and the Chesterfield Branch of th~ Southern Christian Leadership Conference, submitted a cop~ of an alternative redistricting plan (a copy of which is filed with the papevs Of this Board); indicated the groups had reviewed the four redistricting plans and foUn~ ~naCceptable in that they make no ~ffert to m~ximiz~ minority voting strength; that the~ felt smaller sized dis$ricts better serve the citizens~ requested that t~e ~ateaca Magisterial Dis:riot be restored to its previous minority voting size of 29%; and asked tha~ th~ Board give favorable consideration to the proposed plan. Nr. Ray Cash, ~itizen of Dale District, ~tated ~e Pla~ B or ~lan B M0d~fie~ and indicated he felt area residents occurs every %~n years hut that they are comfortable with their district as it currentl~ exists and would ~refer to remain as they ar~. Mr. ~eorwe Beadles, citizen of Mat0ac~ Magisterial District, indicated he felt the proposed redistricting pla~ zt~bmitted by ~ir. ApRlegate to be the least disruptive to the County. ~oweYer, he S~ppo~ted the concept of seven distri~t~ a~ he felt it provided better representation for t~e citizens; would be in the overall best i~terest of the entire County; and requested that the Board defer the ~atter for two weeks for further revieW~ There beia~ no ohm else to address the matter, ~r. Sulliva~ closed the public hearing. Mr~ Daniel stated that the redistricting process was more complex than ~an years ago due to ~ro~t~; that he felt there was no correlation between the size of the 9overning body and the e~eotivenezz of 9overn~ent~ and that ha is ~omfortable with a five member 9overning body and has had nc in~t from oitlzens in his area to increase the ~u~er of the governing body. Be ~Pressed concerns over Plan A relating to ccntinuity~ that it was disruptiv~ in ~hat it split represented citizens. B~ ~tated tha~ he felt Plan D in which four of the dis~ricts w~re changed but not th~ fifth was extremely disruptive to the balanc~ of the population in the CoLhq~y. ~e stated he ~elt that Plan B, Bl~ B Modified, and Plan C ware all acceptable plans but ~hat bi~ support would be tha~ of Plan B Modified mince ir restored the minority voting 91-237 4/10/91 strength to 2t% and maximized the ~u~ber cf minorities voting in Matoaca District. Er. Mayas sta~ed tha~ he did net feel the districts are balanced geogrsphically~ that there should bE a concentration of people, industries, and population in order to balance the County; that Matoaca should be separated as a rural area and each district should have a rural Dart so that the rural areas receive the same equitable distribution as the density areas and further stated that hc felt Plan A would be in the be~t interest uf the County. Mr. Applegate stated that, initially at the work ~ession, he felt that the districts miuht be increased from five to a possible six districts but felt t_ha~ ~he consensus Of the ~ear~ wa~ te remain at five districts a~d, therefure, he had offered Plan D. He stated tahat he ielt Plan D was the disruptive; that he had reviewed Plan B Modified as opposed to Plan D and ~elt both were adequate; that seven districts in WhiCh each was assured ccntinuit~z may he a possibility; that six ~ietrlot~ with the chairm~% ele=tnd at-larg~ would also be a posaibilitF. He indicated that hie support at this point time would be either 91an B ~udified or Plan D. Mr. Currin stated that he ~elt that more representatives did not ~ee=ssurily mean better goverrm%ent; that Pla~ B was too disruptive in t~at it mixed r%Lral and urban ar~as and felt that the rural areas would have less representation. He in, ica=ed that Bermuda District would be obtaining the most citizens and having reviewed the plexus, as to con=inulty~ and in making sure that the ~inoritie~ were represented properly, he felt ~omfortable in recommendin~ Plan B ~odified ~i~ee he ~elt .it gave fair representation to all the distri=ts as far a~ the oi~izens were concerned. Mr. Sullivan stated that he felt the issue of seven superviseE~ versus five supervisors did not necessarily mean better government and that he has had no citizen input e0neerning the number of supervisors representing the County. He expressed concerns about Plan A in that he felt the actual representation of the people in the southern end of the County Would bM adversely impacted mince the northern end of the County had most of the population. Me stated that he was opposed to Plan M due to its racial mix ~inse he deterlora~ed %he exiatlug situation and that plan B Modified addressed thm concerns more ada~uately. ~e indicated that he supported Plan D mines he felt i~ fairly represents all the people of the County and causes the least amoun~ of as his first choice or Plan B Mo~ifie~ am his se0ond choice. Mr. Sullivan noted %hat since the Board had been presented with sores sew information and requests that he would recommend a deferral in order for the Board to review it. There was discussion as to the d~ferral being at a daytime meeting and the Dt%blio hearing being Mr. Sullivan made A ~otion, seconded by Mr. App~egAte, to defer u~xtil April 24, 1991 at 9:00 a.m. consideration of the proposed redistricting plans for Chesterfield magisterial districts. Mr. Daniel sim=ed he felt there had been no sigmi~icantly new information provided either through public comment and/or other discussions that would necessitate deferral. Mr. Daniel offered a substitute motion, seCOnded by Mr. Ceftin, to AdOpt Plan B Modified. Ay, s: Er. Currin and Mr. Daniel. Nays: Fir. Sullivan, Mr. AppleqAte and Mr. 91~238 4/10/91 ~Ir. Micas indicated that there m~st three affirmative to votes to adopt any of the proposed plans. Mr. Sullivan restated his motion, seoondud by M~. Applegate, to defer until April 24, 1991 at 9~00 a.m. consideration of the proposed redistricting plans for Chesterfield County magisterial districts. 13.A.1. STATE ROADACCEFTANCE Thi~ daf the County E~Vixoranuntal Engineer, in accordance wi~h directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Litchfield Drive and Leeds Lane in CreekwQGd, Seotien I, Clover gill District. Upon consideration whereof, and sn motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Litchfield Drive and Leeds Lane in Creekwocd, Section I, Clover Hill District, he and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further r~solv~d, that the Virginia DeDartmen~ of Transportation, be and i% hereby is ree~ested to take into the Secondary System, Litchfield Drive, begiD~i~g =~ existing Litchfield Drive, Sta~e ~oute 3170, and going southerly O.OA ~ilu to the intersection with Leeds L~e, then continuing s0uthe=l~ O.O~ n~tle to end at the tie in with proposed Litchfield Drive, Creekwood, section J~ and Leeds Lane, beginning at the intersection with Litchfield Drive and going ea=terly 0.09 mile tO end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the a~jaoent elope, sight dis%anco and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage e~seme~ts. These roads serve 13 ~ots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisor~ ~arantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50~ right-of-way for Leeds Lane and a 50' to 60~ variable width right-of-way for Litchfield Drive. This suction of Creekwood is recorded as follows: Section I. Plat Book 6~, Page 16, ~ovzmber 22, 19B~. Vote: Un~nimouE This da~ the County E~viro~untal Engineer, in accordance wi~h ~ireotions from this ~oard, m~de report in writing upon his e~amination of Lansgate Lane, Lansgate Road and La, gate CO~Xt in Lanegate, Clover Mill District. Upon consideration w~ereof, and on me'ion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr, May~, it i$ z~solv~d that ~ansgate Lane, L~s~ate Road and LanEgate C0~rt in Lansgate, Clover Kill District, be and thuy hereby are es=~l~hed as p~lic roads. ~d be it further rmsolve~, that th~ Virgi~a ~par~ent o~ Transportation, be and it hereby is re~t~d to take into the Se=ondazy System, Lansgate Lane, b~ginning at ~he inter~ection with Wo~lmke Villas% Parkway, ~tate Rout~ 3~00, and goiag northwesterly 0.05 mile to ~nd at the intersection with Lansgat~ ~ad; Lansgate Road, bugling at the intersectio~ 91-239 411019~ with Lansgate Lane and going southwesterly 0.02 mile, then turning and going northwesterly 0.07 mile tO e~d in a cul-de-sac. Again, Lansgats Road, beginning at the iD%~rsection with Lansgate Sane and Doing northerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Lar~sgate ~ourt, the~ continuing northerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and 5ansgate Court, heglnnlng at the inters~etieo with Lea=gate Road a~d going westerly 0.12 mile, then turning a~%d going southerly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This re,est is inclusive of the adjacent mlope, sigh% distance and designated Virginia Depar~ent of Transportation drainage easements. Theme roads serve 47 lets. A~d be it f~rther resolved, that the Board of Snpervisors guarantees tn the vir$inia Department of Transportation a ~0' right-of-way for all of theme roads. Lansgate is recorded as follows: Plat Book 63, ~ages 5~ and 56, O~tober 26, ~988. Vote: Uaanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Beard, made report in writing upon his ex~minati0n of T~mber Bluf~ Parkway and Lakebluff P~rkwa~, Clover Hill Distrist. Upon con~idcr&tion whereof~ and on motion of Mr. ADDlegate, seconded by Mx. Mayer, it i$ resolved that Tier Bluff Par~ay and Lakebluff P~kwa~, Cl~ver Hill District, be and ~d be it further resolved, that the Virgi~im Depar~ent of TEan~portation, be and it hereby is repasted to t~e into the Secondary System, Ti~x Bluff Parkway, beginning at ~hu intersection with Woolxid~e Road~ state Rout~ 668, and ~oing southeasterly 0.17 mile, then turning a~ goin~ southerly 0.15 mile to end at the intersection with Lakebluff Parkway; Lake- bluff Parkway, b~gi~ing at th~ intersection with T~er Bluff Parkway and going southwesterly 0.02 mile to end at L~ubluff Parkwa!, Phase II. Again, Lake~luff Parkway, be~i~nin~ at the intersection with Ti~er Bluff Par~ay and going northeasterly 0.16 mile~ then turning and going ~outh~asterly o.35 mile to end at the intersection with Woodlake Village ~ar~ay, PhaE~ IV, state Route .n~er to be assigned. This rudest is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance ~d designated Virginia D~par~en= of Tra~por=ati0n drainage easements. ~ene roads serve as access to adjacent residential properties and a Cowry school site. And be it f~ther resolved, that ~he Board of Su~rvis~rs ~arantees to th~ Virginia Depar~ent nE Transportation a 70' right-of-way Tot both o~ these road~. Deed Book 19~9, Pa~e k7~5, DecaYer 5, 1988. Plat Book 64, Page 32, Dec~eE 6, t988. 91-240 4/10/91 This day the County Environmental EngXneer, in accordance with directions from thio Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Lakebluff Parkway, Phage II, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by ~r. ~ay~, it is resolved that Lakebluff Parkway, Phase II, Clover Bill District~ be ~nd it hereby is established as a public road. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hureb~ io requested to take into the Secondary system, Lakehluff Parkway, beginning at the southwest end of existing Lakebluff Parkway, State Route number to be assigned, and going southwesterly 0.05 mile, then turning and going so~thcrly 0.26 mile to end at Lakebluff Parkway, Phase III. This reques~ is inclusive cf the adjacent slope, ~ight distance an~ designa~e~ Virginia Department of Transportation This road serves ns access to adjacent residontial ~roperties. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to =he virginia DeDarUmen~ of Transportation a 70' right-of-wu~ for this road. 5akebtuff Parkwa~ is recorded as follows: Dedication of Lakebluff Parkway, Phase II. Plat Book 67, Page 78~ september 1, 1989. This day the Cou/lty Bnviror~uental Engineer, in accordano~ with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Lakebluf£ Parkway, Phase III, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of ~r. Appiegate, ssc0nded by Mr, Mayas, i~ is resolved that Lakebluff Parkway, ?base III, Clover ~ill District, be und it ~stablishnd us a pu~llC road. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby lo requested to take into the secondary System, Lakeblu~f Parkway, beginning at the southern en~ ~f Lake~lu~f Pazkway, Lakebluff Pathway, Phase Ii, State Route number to be assigned~ and going southerly 0.07 mile, Lakebluff Parkway, Foxer0ft, section II. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and d~sigoated Virginia ~apar~men~ drainage easememts. Thi~ road serves as access to adjacent residential properties. And be it ~urther resolved, that the Board o~ Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department o~ Transportation a right-of-way fox this road. Lakebl~ff Parkway is recorded as follows: Dedication of Lakebluff Parkway, Phase III. Plat book 7Q, Page 83, April 24, 1990. Vote: Unanimous This day th~ County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing ~pon his examination of Walnut Bend Road, Walnut Bend Drive, Walnut Bend Terrace and walnut Bend Co~t in walnut Bend, Phase I, clover Bill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Walnut Bend Road, Walnut Bend Drive, Walmut Bend Terrace and Walnut Bend Court in Walnut Bend, Phase I, clover ~ill District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. ~ be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of ~ranspertation, he and it hereby is re~uested to take into the intersection with Woedlake Village Parkway, State Route 3600, and goin~ westerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Walnut Bend Drive, then turning and going northwesterly 0.07 mile te tho intersection with Walnut Bend Terrace, then continuing northwesterly 0.07 mile, then turning and going southwesterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; walnut Bend Drive, beginning at the intersection with Walnut Bend Read and going southerly 0.08 milo, then turning and ~oing westerly 0.03 mile, then turning and going ~outhweeterly 0.09 mile ~u the intersection with Walnut ~en~ Ceurt~ then continuing ~cuthwesterly 0.04 mile to end at Walnut Bend Drive, Walnut Bend, Phas~ II; Walnut Bend Terrace, beginning at the intersection with walnut Bend Road and going southwesterly 0.12 mile to end at Waln=t Bend Terrace, Walnut Bend~ Phase II: and Walnut Bend Cou~t, beginning at tho interso=tion with Walnut Bond Drive ~nd going southeasterly 0.05 ~ile to end in a O~l-de-sac. distance and designated Virginia Department cf Transportation The~e roads serve 54 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Depar~e~t of Transportation a 50' which has a ~O' te 70' variable width right-of-way. This section o~ Walnut Bend is rec0rde~ as fultnws: Phase i. Plat Bosk 64, Pages 13 & 14, Noven~ber 1~, 19S8. ~is day the County ~nvironmental ~ngineer, in a¢¢0rda~ce with directions ~rcm this Board, made report in writing upon his examination .of Walnut Bend Drive a~d Walnut Bend Terrace in Walnut Bend, Phase II, Clover Hill District. UDen consideration whereof, and on motion of ~lr. Applegat~, seconded by Mr. Maye$, it i~ re~clved tha~ Walnut Bend Drivm and Walnut Bend Terrace in Walnut Bend, Phase II, Clover ~ill District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it ~urthnr resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the S~c~ndary System, Walnut Bend Drive, beginning at existing Walnut Bend Drive, State Route number to ~o assigned, and going southwesterly 0.05 mile to end in cul-de-sac~ and Walnut Route number to be assigned, and going southwesterly 0.~5 mile to in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of TranSportation 4/10/91 These roads serve 17 lot~. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for both of ~h~$~ ~Qads, This sec%ion u~ WalnuU Bend is recorded as ~ollows: Phase II. Plat Book 68, Pages 39 & 40, ~e%obe~ 12, 1989. 13.A./. SKT DA_~.~ FOR PLq~LICHF~AP~]~GS 13.A.~.a. TO ~ON~ID~RAN(~RDZN$~N(iETO~4~{D~CODEO~ CO%r~ITYOF~T~FIR~# 197~ ~AM~E~ BY A~D-- ING AND R~AC~ING S~u"xzO~ 14.1-25 P~LATING~O YKmCLELICENeE TAX Nu~uNDS On ~otio~ of ~r. Applegat~, ~e~onded by Mr. Mayas, the Board set the date o~ May 22, 1991 at 9:QU a.m. for a public hearin~ to ¢on~i~er a~ ordin~c~ to ~end thc Cod~ of the County o~ Chemter~ield, 1978, as ~unded, by ~endlng ~d ru~nacsing 13.A. 2.b. TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF '£~ ~'~"£w_ICK PLAN On motion cf Mr. Applegate, seconded bF ~r. Ma~es, the Board set tho ~a%u o~ ~ay g, 1991 a~ 6:30 p.m. for a public heaxin~ to consider adoption of the ~ttrick ~lan. 13.A.2.~. TO ~O~SIDER AN ~ TO '%ku~ C~A~KA~ BAY P~- On motion oi Nr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, tho Board set the date of May 8, 1991 at 6:30 p.m. for a pl[blic hearing to consider an amendment to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act. 13.A.2.~. TO C0~SIDER LEASING A 2,S00 SgUARE FOO~ ACCE~ ROAD AT ~%NC~F-%~UE~ FI~/~ HOUSK NO. 2 TO C. KLL~A~ ]'~.KPHO~K C~PA~Y AND AU'~'~Z~ I]~(]~rJ.O'/."/.12~[ 0~' A I,EASE A~m~E~TT~ AIFI~O~T~.ATTON FOR RIC~0ND ('mr.'r.uL~ TO FILE A ZONTN~ APPLICATION On motion of 1~'+ Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes~ the Board set the dat~ of ~ay 8, ~991 at 6~30 p.m. to consider l~asing a 2,500 square foot parcel and access road at ~an=hester Fir~ Hous~ Nu. 2 ~o Richmond cellular Telephone Company and authorized execution o~ a lease a~reement; and authorization for Richmond Cellular to file a zoning application. approved requests for bingo/raffle permits for the following organizations for calendar year 1991: 91-243 4/10/91 ~GANIZA~IO~ Ben Air Midlothian Lion's ¢lu~ St. Kichaei's ~a:en~s Aoseciatien Vote: Unanimous Ra£1ie Raffle 13.A.~. A~E~Df~T ~ ~S OF ~R~ ~, 199] On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Ma~es, the Board made tho following amendmento to the March 1~, 199t minutes: Pa~ 162~ ~ne~ 9 "Mr. Applegate ~uggcsted the proposal ~ included in the Board~s 1991 Legislative It wa~ generally agreed to iRstlnlet the County Administrator to i~olu&le in the Chusterfield County 1991 LugislaLivs Packet consideration of a resolution re~uasti~g ~hat referendum quos=ions be Dlaced on the November, 1992 ballo~ relating =o the consolidatio~ of school/County me:vices and Revisions to thc Real Estate Process." "M~. Applagate suggested the proposal be Board's 1992 Legislative included in the I~ was generally agreed to instiller the Connty Administrator %o include in ~he Chaste:field Ceu~t~ 1992 Legislative packet considerati~n of a reselutioa requesting thzt :u£erendum questions be placed on the Nevo~lb~r, 1992 ballot r~lating to the cunsolida=ion of School/County services and Kevisions to the Real Estat9 ~:ocess.'~ And, further, the following cortes%Jun should be made on Page 163, Line ~9: "0~ motion of Mr. Mayas, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the BOard defer:e~ until April 19, 1991 consideration of a~ amendment to Suctions 20-44 a~d 20-72 of th= Cods o~ the COunty of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, relating to water an~ sawer asse~t and dave la~ment districts in r~sidentlally developed areas. TM TO: "On ~etion of Mr. Mayer, s~¢onded by ~r. Daniel, the Board deferred until Ap~it 1~, 1991 consideration of a~ amendment %0 Sections 2U-44 and 20-72 of tho code e~ the C0unt~ of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, relating ~o water ~nd saws: assessment s~d dave loDm~nt districts in residantially Vot~: Unanimous 13.A.$. ACCEPT C~ANGE ORDEI{ TO C~NST[K]ci'iON CC~T~%i~ F(~ PAP, K D~¥~LOi~ AT IP. ON RRTD~E PAI~ On motion of Mr. Applega~e~ ~condsd by ~r. Mayes~ the Board accepted a change order to the construction contract, in the 91-244 4/10/91 amount of $16,633, with Leadbettez Construction for park dev~lopme~ at iron Bridge Park for additional construction at Iron Bridge ~azk to include storm water and sediment retainage rec/~ired to iRsure compliance with appropriate State and were less than originally anticipated in the Iron Bridge Park project, ~here are funds available fez this change or,er.) Vo2e: Unanimous 13.A.6. STOR~WATK~ ~AG~T A~'x~ AND BEST MA~AG~T A~$ l~.A.6.a. FOXCROF~ $~BDIVlSION On motion Of Mx. Applegate, ascunde~ by Fir. Mayes, the Board authorized the County Administrator to execute a Stormwater Facility Maintenance~Indemnification Agreement with developer of Foxcroft S~bdivision, with the Coanty's only invotven~ent being to ass%tr~ that the Maintpnance Agreement followed by the owner. {A copy o~ said Agreement is filed with the paper~ of this SECTIONS 2/4 On motion of ~r. ApDlegaue, seconded by ~-r. ~ayes, the ~ear~ authorized the Co%~nty Administrator to execute a Stormwater Management Agree2~eRt $¥s~e~ a~d ~es~ ~anagement Practice Facilit~ Maintemance/In~e~ification Agre~ent with the dmvelopex o~ Fiv~ ~ork~ Village, Section 1 ~d Dortion~ of sections 2/A, with the County's only involvement being to assure =hat the Mainte~ A~rs~ent is followed by the owner. (A copy of said Agre~ent i~ filed with the papers o~ ~his Board.) 13.A. 6.c. I~ONBI~TD~E 0~ ~otion of ~lr. Applegate, seconded by Hr. Mayes, the Board authorized the C0~%y Administrator to execute a Stor~water Management Agreement System and ~est Management Practice Facility ~aintenanos/Indemnificstion Agreement with the deVeloper oZ Ironbridge Development, with the County's only involvement being to assure that the Ma~Bte~a~ce Agreement is followed by the owner. IA cody ~f said Agreement im filed with the papers of this Board.) On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by ~r. Msyes~ the Beard Facility M~inten~ce/Indemnificati~n Agreements with 9!-245 4/10/91 Bexley, Section 15; Eaglewood, Section 1; gagiewood, Se0~ion 2; and ~0~ca~ Hill~, Portion of ~eotion l, Portion of Section 4 and Section 5, with the County's only involvement b~ing to assur~ that the Maintena~cu Agreements ar~ followed by the owner. (A COPY of said Agreement is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Applegata, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board authorized the County Administrator to execute a Stormwater Shopping Center, with the County's only involvement being to ~er~ (A e0py of said Agreement is filed with the papers of this Board.) On motion of Mr. Applogate, seconded by ~Lr. Mayas, the Board apDrove~ a xe~ue~% from sheriff clarence J. williams, Jr. to participate in the County's personnel system, pursuant to S~ction 6.4 of the ~eunty Charter, and Seeticn 2.1-114.5:1(C1 of the Code of Virqlnia, and conditioned upon Sheriff williams' agreement to comply with the County's personnel system effective i~ediately. Veto: Unanimou~ 13.A.9. TRANF~U( FUNDS TO CC~PL~r~ LORI ROAD WIDENING PROJECT On motion o~ Mr. Applugate, sucondcd by Mr. ~ayes, the Board transferred $41,900 from the iron ~rid~e Reoreationai Access Account and $7,7~Q from the ~tate Road Improvements Account to ~he Lori Rued Wi~enlmg Vote: Unanimous 13.~. ~$OL~TION ~LLOCATIN~ Z~r~DS TO SCHOOL Mr. aamsey explained the proposed resolution was xequosted b~ the Board earlier at the work session and explained what financial impacts wQ~!d occur. There wa~ discussion relative to interest b~ing earned; how the School Board will pay back the money; what interest the school Board will b~ payinq on the money; and when the money will be paid back to the County. On motion of ~r, Applegate, seconded by ~r. Daniel, the Beard adopted the following resolution: the County to permit the School Board uo borrow funds for funds~ 91-246 WHEREAS, In order ~o accomplish the borrowing of such ~unds it is necessary to rc=llsoate bond fnhda currently allo¢~te~ for public safety capital projects to school capital Dr~jecta. of the County of Che~terfi=l~, Virginia ~hat $4,525,000 uf projects, pursuit to a r~ren~ ~lection held o~ ~ov~er softener 26, 1990 an~ October 24, 1990, im hereby reallocated when the funds borrowed pursuant to this resolution are returned to the Co=~y b~ =ha School Board, such ~unds shall i~ediately be allocated to p~lic safet~ c~pital projects. Vote: U~animous 13.B. STrOll' LIC~TINSTAT.[.~TIONCOSTAPPROVAL~ On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. approved stree~ light installation locations with ~unds to be e~ri~ended indiuated: s~e~ Road {Dale District stree~ Ligh~ Account) Brevard Avenue costs a~ ~he followin~ $~,~29 $ 686 1~.C. UTILITIES DEPART~T IT~(S 13.C.2. CONSENT IT~4S 13.C.2.a. AWARD OF CONST~CTIO~ CONTRACT F~R BB~u~OT ROAD WA'r~K LINE On motion o~ Mr. Applegate, Se¢0nde4 by ~r. Currin, the Board awarded C0~aet Number 89-0717 for the rehabilitation of an 8" water nine along Huguenot Road, between Woedm~a~ Drive and Jinm~y Winters Road, to H. Haahner ~ay Company, Inc., whu submitted the low bid in th~ a~ount of $440,4~0.20, and authorized the Count~ Administrator to execute the necessary documents. 13.c.2,b. REQUEST FRf~4 ~OL~IA CAS TR~N~ISSI~ CORi~)RATION · O ~C~OAC~ ON CO~Ti~ PROPE~i~ IN T~ VICIRITY OF On motion of Mr. Applegate, ~e~onded by ~. Cut,in, the Board apprevsd a request from Collie Gao Tr&I~s~issio~ C~rporation to work D/o~ossd temporary rigkt-of-wa~ s~ject paper~ of this Board.] Vote: Unanimous 91-247 4/10/91 APPROVAL OF WA'x~K C~TRACT ~0R OLD C~TRALIA On motion of Mr. Appleg=te, susonded by Mr. CBrrin, the Board awarded contract ~umbe~ $9-0~14 for Old Centra%ia Shopping Center to Old Centralia Crossing Association, L.P., iR the amount o~ $75,5t$.00, and authorized the County Administrator Vote: Unanimous 13.c.2.d. ACC~DTANCE OF pA~ ALONG ~%TLL ~-~- ROAD ~R~INIA ~A~NTCOMI~ANY~ INC. On mn~ion of Mr. ApplianCe, seconded by ~r. Currin, th~ Board accepted on b~hmlf of the Cowry the conveyance of a 20' parcel ~f %an~ along Hull Street RQ~ from Virginia Paint Co., Inc., A Virqinia Corporation, and authorized th~ Co~ty A~inistrator to execute th~ necemsa~ dee~. {It is notud u copy of said plat is ~ile~ with the paper8 of this Board.) Vote; U~qi~ous 13.~.2.o. ACCEioT~NCE OF PO~I0~S OF WHITTE~ mAW/~WAX KLIN~FA~ILY LI~-r~UP~P on motion cf MI. Applegat~, seconded by ~r. Currin, the Board =he right-of-way for ~itten Parkway from Kline F~ily Limited ~ar~n~rship, A Vi=ginia Limi~e~ Par~nsrshiD, and authorized =~e County A~inistrator ~o ex.cute the n~cess~y deed. copy of said ~lat is ~ilud with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 13.c.3. REPORTS Mr. Sale pre~ented the Board with a report on the develoger wa%er and sewer ¢on~raet$ ~xe~ut~d by the County Administrator. I~.D. ~r. Ramsay Dzesented the Board with a states report on the ~eneral Fund Continguncy Account; General Fund Rsservs for Futura Capital Projects; Distriot ~oad an~ Light Funds~ Lease Purchases; and School Board ~r. Ram~y stated the Virginia Department of Transportatio~ has formally notified the County o~ the acccDtance Of ADDITiOns ~STWOULD FAR~S - EECTION L (Effective 3-19-91) Route 2200 (Lcren Drive) - From 0.06 mile south Route 691 to Rout~ 2413 0.27 Route 9575 (Blue Rock Drive) - Fr~m 0.12 mile North Route 2280 to 0.11 mile So~thw~t Rout~ 22~8 ~.23 Mi. Rou~e 3376 (Loren Court) - From Route 2200 to 0.05 mile North Route 2200 0.05 Mi. 91~245 4t10/91 WOODLAKE ¥ILL~GE PARKWAY fEf~eotive 3-18-91) Route 3500 (woodlake village Parkway) - mile Northeast Route 4302 to 0.0~ mile Southwest Route 4546 0,47 Route 2937 (Five Spr~ng~ Road) - From 0.0~ mile ~orth Rout~ ~955 tO 0.11 mile ~orth Route 2938 O.09 0~ ~otion of M_r. Applegat~, seconded by ~Sr. Currin, the Board adjourno~ at $~15 p.m. (DST) until 9:00 a.m. (DST} on A~ril 24, 1991. vote: Unanimous 91-249 4110191