The URL can be used to link to this page

05-22-91 Minutes1991 l~r. M. B. Sullivan, Chairman ~r. C. F. C~rrin, ~r,, Vice Chrm. ~. G. H, Applegate ~. Harry G. Daniel Mr. Lane B. Ram~ey co~ty Adminiutra~or Mr. N. =. Car~iohael, Mr. Richard Cerdle, C~ief ~s. J. A~y Davis, Asst. to Co. Admi~. ~s. Dori~ R, DeHart, Asst. Co. Intergovern. Affa~r~ Ms. Jean S. Cl~rk to the Board chief ~ober% L. Eane=, Fir~ ~r, Bradford S. Deputy Co. Admin., Management Services ~r. Thomas E. Jacobsen, Di~., Planning ~. Ronald ~. L~vingston, Circuit Court cl~rk Dr. Burr Low~, Dir-, ~, ~ary Leu Lyle~ Dir., Accounting Dir., Transportation Mr. RichaTd M. Dir., ~DV+ ~ng~neerlng Mr. Steven L. Micas, County Attorney Dir., N~w~ & 9ublic Info~ation Services Col. J. E. Pittman, Mr. William O. Peele, ChieF~ Dev. R~view, Plannln~ Mr. Richard F. Sale, DeD~y CO. Admin., Co,unity Dev~iopm~ut Mr. Ja~es J. L. Dir.~ ~dget & Management Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr., Dir.~ Dir., Libraries Er. David H. Mr. B. R. Wilkinson, License Inspector Mr. Sullivan called the regularly scheduled m~ting to order at 9:10 a.~. (DST). 91-349 5/22/91 1. Kr. Sullivan introduced M~. M. D. ,P~t~,, ~tith, Jr., Director CZ Parks and Recreation, who gave the invocation, Mr. Ramsay led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of United States cf America. the ~. APPRO%~kLOFMINu'i'ES on motio~ of Mr. Appl~gate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, the Board Vote: Unanimous Mr. Hammer introduced and welcomed Mr. John Lillard, the newly Er. Daniel, Er. Currin and Fr. Applegats stated they had attended the Richmond Regionml Planning Di~trlct nesting in which there had been discussion about planning the Solid Waste Authority. ~tr. Daniel and Mr. App~egate stated they had also atZended a ~udget meeting in regard~ to the Capital Region Airport Commission and that although there hum been a downturn in the economy and a recent decline in passenger enplanements, the Commiss~on'E financial si%nation wa~ very atFeng in t~at they h~ve been able to implement many contingency plan~ regarding cqtti~g costs and capital ~rowth. Faf. Daniel requested the County Administrator eo~pil¢ a liot of key legislative i~es~ in whick the County would like to have broad-ba~ed ~uppnrt for am VAC0 will be formalizing it~ legislative program in the near future. ~[r. Mayas stated ha had attended the education and Advisory Co~ittee for th~ Council on Info~ation and Management in public schools for the instruction cf %he technolo~ curricul~ is still b~ing add~essed and that he had also attended the Executive Meeting of the Crater ~lnnning District c~i~sion regarding its annual review. Mr. Sullivan stated he had recently traveled =~ New York w~th members of County and School staff to meet with bond counsel although ~e results of the trip were not available at thi~ time in regards to bond money, he felt the trip had provided felt the partioipation of all who attended was necessary and in thm best interest of the County. added Item 11.B.15., Granting of a Parking Easement to the Forest View Volunteer Rescue Squad to Use Undesignated Parking Spaces at the Buford Road Fire Station, to follow Ztea 5/22/91 ll.E.l~.; Deferred Item 9.B., Authorization to Exercise Eminent Domain for the A~quisiti~n of ~a~mment~ for the Phy~i~ Hill ~levated Water Tank - Thomas J. smith, et als., until June 12, 1991; R=numbe~ed Item ll.B.10.~ Adoption on an E~ergency ~asis of an Amendment to Section 7.2-9 ef %he Cods of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as A~ended, Relating to the Fee for Review of an Erosion and ssdiment confrol Plan, to 11.G.a.; and Renumbered Item ll.B.11., Approval of V~DA Financing for the Mallard Cove Apartments on Price Club Boulevard to 11.G.b., both %0 follow Item 11.B.13., and adopted the agenda, a~ amended. Vote: Unanimous 7.A. I~ECOGNIZING E/~IG~T~ OF~RGI~IA ~I~;~N~R FOR 'r~ D~. Bart Lows introduced ~s. ~e~y ~everly, Chairman o~ the Co--unity Services Board, and ~. Edward ~epr~ntative of KOV~. On motion of ~a Board, ~e following re~olutlun was ~s, The Knights of vir~inla Asses=anon fur the Retarded, al~o r~f~rred to as KOV~ is comprised of council repre~entatlves of ~e ~ights of Columbus throughout the Co~onw~al~ of Virginia; and ~ER~$, ~ mi~ion of thi~ organization i~ to aid ~overnmental and eligible non-profit o~ganizations who provide assistanu~ or work with persons with mental retardation ~EREAS, The Knight~ of Virginia Assistance for the ~=R=AS, Thim funding ham provi~e~ Sot the furnishing of a ~cup home for persons with mental disabilities in addition mental ~etardation; and ~E~A8, Throughout the yaar~ KOV~ ha~ ~on~tently and and ~E~AS, A recent grant in the amount of $10~326 was awarded by KOV~ to purchase co~unlcatlon, dlagno~tic and sensory ms,or ~quipmen~ for ~is pro,am wRich ~erve~ wi~h developmental disabilities from birth to age two. NOW, TH~EFO~ BE IT RESOLVED, ~a~ the Chesterfi~!d County Board cf Supervisors hereby expresses sincere ~atitude an~ appreciation to the Knights of Virginia Assistance for Retarded (KOV~) for their dedicated c~i~t and generous ~upport of the mental h~alth, m~tal retardation an~ substance abuse services pro, ams provided to the citizens of Chesterfield County. ~D, BE IT FURTKER RESOLVED, ~at a copy o~ re~olutlon be presented to KOV~ and this resolution De~anently recorded among t~e papers of t~is Board of ~upervi~or~ of Che~t~rflald County, V~rqin~a. Mr. Sullivan presented the executed r~solution tO Mr. ~cC~skur and hhanked KOVAR for their financial asmimtance and m~pport 7.B. RECOGNIZING ~]~B~qS OF Tn~ CORPORATE CO~I~$[~FKTY F~R TAPIR ~ERO~S..t~ONTR--W~UTIONS ~ ~E ~ OF ~ ~ Mr. frith introduced ~. Mike Sto~k, ~epr=~ntative of Maria P~i~oe, repre~=ntatives of siva Co~ercial Realty, Inc. & The Principal Financial Group. on motion of the Board~ t~e following r~solution was adopted: ~E~AS, Music is a cultura~ opportuni=y whi~ should be avaAlable tO all memb~r~ of the chesterfield co=unity; and ~E~S, Th~ Boulders Family Concert Series, sponsored by ~e Pa~k~ and Recreation Department, is an avenue to this ~ur~ult; an~ ~EREAS, The flnaneial contributions of Siva co~ercial Realty, Inc. & The Pzincipal Financial ~o~p, and Johnston- Willis Hospital hmve ma~e attendance at t~is concert series fre~ for the public. NOW, TH~O~E BE IT ~SOLVED, thut the Board of Su~ervlsor~ of ~mstmrfleld County does hsreby recognize siva co~ercial Realty, Inc. 6 The Prlncipal Financial Group an~ Johnston-Willis Hospital for their generous donations toward the concert series. AND, BE IT F~TH~ RESOLVED, ~hat ~he ~oard of Supervisors does hereby express it~ appresiatio~ and gratitude to these members of the corporate community fur theiz interest in and contribution toward the quality of life in Chesterfield County. Vote: Unaniaous ~. Sullivan presente4 the ~xecuted re~olutions %o Mr. Stook~ Mz. card%n and M~. P~ince and e~reE=ed hi~ appreciation for their particiDmt~cn and muppo~t of the Boulders Family Concert ?.C. Pd~CO~NIZING~S "PEST CON~T~OL MONT~{- ~- sulliva~ recognized ~. David Boost, Pre~iden~ of thm Virginia Pm~t Control Asmociation~ who was present. On motio~ of the Board~ the followi~q ~esol~tio~ was adopted: ~S~ Insects, rodents and other p~sts constitute a threat to h~an health and ~a~e~y if enoch=rolled; and WH~S, ~ro~essional pem~ ~ont~o1 eperators p~rfo~ a ~aluable service %o the C~unty of Chesterfield through mducation of the publlu =~ Drevent infestations and soientific treatment of problems; and ~S, Without a highly ~rain~d structural Dest control indu~=ry, ~he lifestyle of our citizen~ would be adv~rmely affected, NOW, THER~FORE B~ IT R~SOLVED, by the Chesterfield cowry Board of sup~{~or~ t~at the month of June b~ recognized as "Pest Control ~onth" i~ recognition of and appreciation for D/22/91 the valuable work performed by the structural pest control ~n~us~ry. Vote: Unanimous M_rt ~llivan pr~nted the executed re~olution to Mr. Boose and ~xpr~ssed appreciation to the Association for their ~fforts in educating the eo~unity as well as protecting the environment. S. HEAKING~ OF ~TIZ~NS ON ~NSCHED~LED MATTEP~g OR ~ There w~re no hsarings of citizens on unscheduled matter or claims scheduled at this ti~e. 9. DEFERRED ITEM~ 9.A. NOMINATION AND At~POI~I~ OF ~NDIDAT~ TO ~ ~ ~ B~A DT~ Mr. ~icas stated ~im ~t~m had b~en deferred from the ~ay 1, 1991 Dubllc hearing ~ consider nominees fo~ aDDoin~ent from had presented them~elvem for the appolntment--~. ~rshall Tra~ell, Mr. ~omas A. Mill=r, Dr~ Myr~a Cop~land and Kathy Goyne; that the Regimtrar had datelined that all candidates were eligible for appoin~n%; and that in order fo~ the Board to nominate and appoint, the Board needed to mumpend its rule by unanimous votm an~ that the first n~minee who ~ceived th~ vot~ of th~ Board would be the S~hool Board appointee from ~e ~ermuda District fur a Sour year beginning July 1~ 1991. ~. Currin ~tated that he felt this was one of his ha~demt into CQnStderatlon the candidates views on ~jor problems the County citizenry. ~e added that all the candidates were highly qualified: that he had interviewed ~a~ separately an~ was i~pressed by all; that h~ und~r~tood meet of the other Board ne. ers had also interviewed candida%es; ~a~ the responsibility an~ the 4ecisions that would placed on ~e potential SChOOl Boar~ ~embe~ wa~ g~eat; that hm ha~ looked at th~ qualifications of each candlda~ and that each candidate had expressed their views clearly and that h~ had ~iven much thought an~ 4~liberatiun to ~his 1991 through June 30, 1995. On motion of ~. Currin, sscon~ed by Mr. Appl%gat~, ~e s~spe~d~d its ~les to allow si~lta~e0us nomination and appoiRt~e~t for ~e representative of ~ B~rmudu District to ~e School Board. an ~anlmou~ con~nnus of ~ ~oard ~n order to suspend the ~l~s and~ therefore~ ~e motion was null and void and ~e Boar~ at thi& time ghould nominat9 o~n~idat~ and ~n oon~ide~ the appointment at their next meeting. Mr. ~ayes stated that it ha~ been his policy, in ~e past and would be in %h~ luture, not to participate in ~e and nomination of candidates %o the School Board f~om a District other than Matoaca becaus~ he felt he was not by those residents and it would be unfair to do so as ~ose candidates would not b~ representing his District. 91-350 5/Z2/91 Mr. Applegate stated that ne had interviewed each of the candidates and ~elt that $~nee all the candidate~ were well qualified, he could ~upport any cn~ of the them hut that he also realized it was a hard decision and, therefore, he would support Mr. Currin'~ d~cleisn. M~. Sullivan stated that he had interviewed each of the candidates and felt that the selection process was a good process and that the candidates presented in the past for all cf the Districts have been outstanding and he also supported I4r. Daniel stated that he had interviewed all of the candidatem and realized that it wa~ a difficult decision and to offer and he also could support any one of the candidates. ~e stated he would support the District's nominee. }tr. Mayas restated that the Distri0t Sup~rvis0r ~eleots the and as in the past, does nub feel h~ shuuld take a ~ositlon to nominate for a group that did not elect hi~; that he feels the issue is between the Supervisor and the oonstltuents of that particular District; that he did not interview any of the candidut~m for nominations; and that he would discuss the matter for appointment at the appropriate time. There were no other Domin~ti0n~ for bermuda District School soar~ represents=ire. on notion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board closed the nomlnatlon~ for candidates to the $¢hool soord ~rom the Bermuda District. Mr. Curtis excused himself from the meeting. It we~ generally agreed to reces~ for five minutes. Reconveying: 9.C. ~UBLTC ~T~q~ING TO CONSIDER AN ORDII~ANCE TO VACATE A Mr. Sale ~tated the ~oard had deferred the public hearing consider an ordinance to vacate a 50 foot and variable wid~ right-cf-way within salisbury subdivision, West seotion~ fro~ i=~ May 8, 1991 m~ting. He stated Mr. Mark attorney to m~et with th~ County Attorney. Mr~. ~arnett ~a~rman stated she was the applicant; that th~ i~u~ h~d b~en in existence for ~ome time; =has Mr. Edward Will~y had met ~ith the neighbors and had proffered zonln~ re~ues~ and 5greed with the ne~ghbor~ to vacate the stub road; that Mr. Mark Sowers, the developer, wa~ aware of the decision regarding the road; that the re,est should gr~nt~d du~ to health~ safety, and welfare rea~un~; r~ted the Board to give favorable consideration to the NS. Pays Palmer, representing residents of Netherfleld Dr~ve~ submitted a petition to th~ Board signed Dy all residents W~ll aa a letter to ~r. Appiegate; presented a brief overview Of how the stub road had comm in existence; stated that the Planning Commission had heard the eriginaL request and had denied aeee$~ to Ro~emont Subdivision by way of thm Netherfield stub road; that IEr. Edward willey wa~ in agreement o£ vacating thm stub road~ that ~h~ felt there were too many h~alth, maf~ty, and welfRre issues; that the rmm~dentm be taken on a case by ca~e bazi~; and requested the Board to ~iva favorable consideration to the request to vacate. ~erz b~ing no one el~e to address this ordinano~, a~opted ~he following ordinance: ~ ORDINatE ~h~rmby ~e OO~Y CHESTERFiELD~ ViR~INIA, ("~TOR") vacates to PAUL D. ~E~ and G~ETT ~SH~L, JR. and ~EEN P. ~S~LL (husband and wi~e), a 50~ and varia~Ze wld~ Kenneg Section, Midlo~hian of th~ Circuit court of ChR~terfield County in Plat Bmok ~4, Pm~e 70. ~S, ~. and M~s. Paul D. Made,an the Board of Sup~rvimors of Chesterfield Co~ty, Virginia to vacate a 50~ and variable width stu~ road in Salisbury S~ivi$ion, W~$t Kennet Seetion~ ~idlothlan Magist~ial District, ~emterfiald Cmunty~ vir~nla more particularly Office of ~e circuit Court of s~id County in Plat Bo~k 34, Page 70. ~e road petitioned to be vacated is mor~ fully described a~ follow~: A 50' and variable width stub road the loQation of which is more fully Shown on plat by J. E. Tigons & Associates, dated Au~st 30, 1979, a copy of whic~ is attache4. of the portio~ of stub road sought to b~ vacated. NOW THERIFORE, BE IT ORDAINED ~Y THE B0~ OF That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) Of ~e Code of Viruinia. 19~0, as amended, the aforesaid stub road hereby vacated. Grant~r hereby reserves a 30* ingress/egress and utility eus~ent a~ shown on the attached plat. Thi~ Ordinance shall b~ in full force and effect in accor~mnce with Section 1~.1-4~2(b] of th= Co~ ~f virginia. I9~0, am amended, and a certified copy of thim Ordinance, sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Clrcu~t Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia gur=u~t 5/22/91 ~he effect e~ ~hi~ O~dinanee pursuant to ~ction portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinano~ shal% ve~t $impls title to the oonterline cf the stub road hereby vacated in thm owners .of the abutting le~s within Salisbury Subdivision~ West Kennet section, free and clear of any rights cf public use. Accordingly, this Ordinance ~kall De indexed in the names of the County Of Chesterfield a~ g~antor and PAUL D. HAMMERMAN and ~AI%NETT D. HAM24E/L~IA~, (~ushend and wi£e)~ SA~U2Z~ F. ~S~L, JR. and ~EEN P. ~LL, (husband and wife), their successors in title, as gran~ee. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applaga%~, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Abment: ~. Currin. Mr. Stegmaler stated this item had been deferred from =he ~ay B, 1991 meeting, w~ic~ a~ that time it was th% general consensus of the Board, to consider dsforring a decision regarding the adjustment in the per let amount for cash proffers until Fiscal Year 1992. Mr. Mayas stated his concern was that currently the cash proffer system was devised so that the ¢o$t per lo~ w~ $2,000 even though it cost hhe County $8~000 for service pst dwelling unit and felt the Board n~ed~d to address the difference in cost. Mr. Danlsl etate~ that the cash proffer policy was net being changed; that the actual amount of money collected from cash preffers last year had been minimal; that the D~ojeetion of cash proffers between the present and January, 1992 would also be relatively small; that at the work ~em~ion it h~d been the step of funding for oaoh proffers until Junuary, 1992; that the Board expected a report in Uanuary concarnln~ the fundlnq of infra~trUctur~ from the Revenue Resources and Infrastructure Cozn~it~es; and, ~herefore, felt the Board should defer implementing the next et~p fo~ cash proffer=. Mr. Applegate and Mr. Sullivan stated that due to the down in the economy, they would support a deferral. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Apple~ate~ th~ Board deferred adjusting the camh proffer payment per lot for Fiscal Year 1992 until January, 1~92. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Daniel, Ab~en=: Mr. Currin. Mr. Mica~ ~tated thi~ d~t~ and tim~ had been advertised fo= a public h~arlng to con~ider an ordinance regarding the current procedure for taxpayers receiving refunds f~r mo%or vekicl~ 91-352 5/22/91 M~, sullivan note~ there had been some concern by citizens regarding the number of tax bi]l~ received and payable at the same time and lcoation and instructed tbs County Administrator to look into the matter. On motion of Mr~ Applegat~, ~econded by Mr. Mayas, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINkNCE TO AMEND T~E CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMP/~D~D, B~AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 14.1-25 RELATING TO ~OTOR VEHICLE LtC~S~ TAX R~FU~D~ BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1] That Section 14.1-~ of the Code Df~the County o~ Che~terflnld~ 1978~ e~ amende~, is amendsd and reenacted ~ follows: (a} Any person holding a c~rre~t license who disposes of refund due under this section shall be prorated monthly license i~ ~urrendered end the refund shell be calculated on the basis of one-twelfth (1/1~) of t~a annual license tax for refund under this seotien of less than two dollars (SS.00}. (o) If the treasurer is satisfied that a llommse has (d) NO cthe~ refund procedure shall be required for the treasurer to make a license tax refund except as providmd by this section. Absent: Mr. Currin. ~_~= TO CONSIDER ANORDINANCE for a p~lio hearing to consider an ordinance relating =o tax relief for ~e elderly and disabled. Ke ~tated staff had prepared several financial impacts; and race--ended Option Three. He noted that c~ren~ly ~here ~hat ~h~ Co~ission~r of R~v~Du~ had indicated that he may need additional staffing during the application period if thgre is a substantial inor~as9 in the number of appli~ant~. There was no one Dresen= to address this ordinance, On motion of ~r. Applega~e, s~cunded ~y ~r. Daniel, ~e Board adopted ~e following ordinance: 5/22/91 A-N ORQI~A~c~ TO A~4~ND THE CODE OF TNE COUNT~_O~ REENACTING SECTIONS 8-15, 8-i6 and 8-17 R~TING TOR~ ~$TATE TAX ~X~TION FOR C~TAIN ELDERLY BE IT ~AINED by the Board of Supervisors of ~t~rfi~ld County: CO~tV of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted as fellows: Notwithstandin~ any other provision of this chapter, the dwelllng and up to on~ (~) a~re of lan4 upon whluh i= situated subject to real estate taxation under this chapter may be temporarily ~xempt~d fram such tax when any such property i~ owned by and occupied as th~ sole dwelling of a Der=on not le~ than sixty-five (65) years of ag~ or a w~o is determined to De p%rman~ntly and =orally disabled defined in =action ~-17.1, hereunder, subject to the follewing r~triction~ and (a) That the total co~ined income during the =almndar y~ar from all sources of the owners ~f ~e dwelling living therein deem not exceed thirty-sev~n rheum=nd nine hundred ninety-nin~ ~ullars ($ 37,999.00); provided, ~hat firmt four thoumand o~e h~n~red ~ullar~ ($4,100.00) of income of ~ach relatlve~ other than ~po~e, of th~ owner~ who living in the dwelllng ~hall not b~ ~ncluded i~ s~oh to=al. (b) That the net combined financial worth, includlng interest, a~ of D~c~mbe~ ~1 of the i~medi~t~ly preceding calendar y~r, of the owners, an~ of the spouse of any owner, ~xc]uding ~e value of ~ dwelling, and one {1) acre of land u~on which it i~ ~ituate~, do~s not exceed ~aven~y-~ive Sec. S-I6. Schedule of ~xe~btion~ (a) When the total combined incom~ from all mourca~ and the net co~in~d f~nancial worth of the persons qualifying does no% exceed the limit~ pr~scrib~d in section $-15, amount of exemption from real e~tate taxation for the dwelling $0 through 14,999 $15,000 through 54,999 $25,000 through 37,999 I001 ~01 ~51 (b) The tax exemption provided by this article shall not exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00). Sec. 8-17. Procedure for clai~ind exemption. (a) The person or parsons claiming such exemp=ion shall fil~ annually with the Commissioner of revenue of the county, on forms to be suDplied by the ~ounty, an affidavit setting forth the names of the related parsons occupying such real e~tate, the total combined ~et worth, including et/citable interest, and the combined income from all ~ouroe~ of the perso~ or person~ s~eking to q~elify_ The co~mi~ioner Of the revenue shall also make such further inquiry cf psrzons eeeklng such axemptlon, reguiring answers under oath, as may be reasonably necessary, insluding production of certified tax returns, to determine guaLifieation therefor, such affidawit shall be filed not later than April ~ of each year, provided that such application may be filed ne later than Decc~ba~ 31 as defined by the commissioner, and provided further for the tax year of 1991 the deadline for filing appliQation$ ~hall be September 1, 1991. If such pcr~o~ is under sixty-f~ve (65) year~ of age such form shall have attached thereto a =ertificatlon by the Social Security Administration, the Veteran's Admlnist~atien or the Railroad Retirement Board, or if ouch person is not ellglble for certification by any of these agencies, a sworn a~idavit by two (2) medical doctors licensed to practice medicine in the ~e~onwealth, to the effect that such perSOn i~ pe~anently and totally disabled. The affidavit of at least one (1} of such doctor~ cheil be baaed upon a physical examination of each person by such doutor. The af£idavit of one (1) of such doctors may be ba~ed upon medical information contained in the recnrde of the civil service co~mission~r which is relevant to the standards for determining permanent and total disability. Such affidavit shall be filed no later than April 1 of each year, provided that for the tax year of ~991 the deadline for filinq s~eh affidavit shall ~e So~e~%be~ 1, 1991. Ayes: F~r. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Daniel and ~r. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Currin. ~. Sale stated this date and ti~e had been advertised for a joint public hearing with the Virginia Depar~ent of T~an~portation {VDOT) to con~ider the FY-92 Secondary Road Improvement Bud~e~ and ~ha~ a r~presentative from VDOT pre~ent. He stated that this wa~ t~ ~eeond y~ar of the six year program adopted by the Boa~d and ~a= the amount available for ~Y92 wa~ Z4% le~s th~n what had been projected, Mr. Roger Medlock, representing residents of ~e Nillside Subdivision, stated t~at t~e subdivision ha~ only one rout~ ingress/egress whi:h i~ by way of Pine For~t Drive; that it more traTns per day; that %ko resident~ had previously appeared before th~ Board at a prev~ou~ meeting and pre,anted =he ~ubdivi~ion's problem of bein~ Gu~ off from fir~ and ~uuld nut b~ reached; t~at ~inoe last July the crossing has been blocked three different tim~ by tra~n~; that previously and the residents feel the health, safety, and welfare associated with thi~ situation a~a great; that ~ ~he roa~ and connecting it wi~h Wood~ E~ge Road; ~at there had b~mn an on, itc investigation with staff in which recognlz~d; that al~ough ~ residents r~lize many enter into the decision making process, that as of this date, been improved are not as imperative a~ ~is project because the health, safety, and welfar~ issues associated with it; and Plan. Discussion, questions, and comments ensued relative to cerrospcndence transmitted between staff and residents of Millslde Subdivieion; money available for the p~oject; and the Mr. John Mccracken~ Direotor of Transportation, stated that staff had met with Mr. Medlook numerous times to try to develop options for a Second access; that initially due to condition~ placeO on th~ ~ub4ivi~iun, it was recommended that the subdivision not he built unless there wa~ a second access and that over time those conditions had been removed as the subdivision developed; that the~e had been an choir= invemtigutlou with staff; tkat staff has looked at and identified other alturnativcs but that there is no source of £unds available at this point in time. Mr. Sale stated that the Planning Commission had also made an onsihe investigation and had recalled the approval O~ the subdivision which prevents any additional lots being developed incorporated in the Capital Improvement Program which wus adopted by the Board; and that since this project is not a primary system~ it is ineligible for funding from this source. hearing was closed. There was discussion regarding unavailable source o£ funds for this project~ other projects that have been in existence for long periods of time that also have extreme safety problems; whether the design and comt for this project had been £inalized; the cost c£ the emergency crossings ~s~ng approximately $40,000 to $60,000; reducing the money for other ~rojects whi=h would adequately address this problem but would probably create other problems; etc. The Board requested the County hdminimtrater to tr~ to find available funds from other sources to help with an emergency cromming, which might Only be ~ %~mporary solution to the problem until a permanent solution can be found. adopted the following resolution: W~ER~AZ, The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) ha~ submitted it~ prcpo~%d FY 199~92 Secondary Road Improvement ~udget to the County; and W~EREAS, The FY 1991~92 budget represents th~ implementation of th~ ~¢oD~ year of VQOT~e six year improvement ~lsn a~opted by the Board in 1990. NOW, T~SREFORE 8E IT RESOLVED, that the chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approves the FY l~l-~ Secondary Road Improvement Budget as presented by VDOT. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan~ ~r. Applegate~ Mr. Daniel and Mr. ~ayes. On motion of Mr. Mayo-, seconded by Mr. Applegat~, the Boar~ approved obtaining cost estimates for the installation of street lights at the intersection of Holly Hill Road and Holly Street in Matoaca District. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate, ~r. Daniel and ~r. ~ayes. 5/22/9Z I~Ob-E~T FOR ~PROV~ O~X~HWA¥ ~ ~ ~P~TION~ On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Appl~gat~, th~ Board authorized the Co~ty Administrator to ~ke ~pplication to ~= Virginia Dspartment of Moto~ Veh~l~ for the POliCe Department, in the amount of $194,~00, for $i~ hiqkwmy safety qrant~ which funds will ba used to pay ~alnrlms or ~urchasa goods and s~rvlCus tO carry out approved ~ants an~ to create one full-ti~ traff~ analyst position which w~ll replace ~e present part-time analyst position, and further appropriate ~uid funds in FY92, if approved. (It is no,ed tha~ if the grant funds are eliminated in FY92 or subs~ent years, ~e full-time position will b~ ~liminatad a~d that thi~ gran~ re~ires no local matching funds.) Ayes: ~. Sullivan, ~. Applagnte, Mr. Daniel and ~. ~yes. Absent: ~. Cuxrin. 1~.~-~- ~0~ ~/~H RECREATIONAL ACCESS. RO~D~ROJ~CT On motion Of Mr. Daniel, seconded by ~. Applegate~ th~ Board %~n~farred ~2,600 f~o~ the 0akla~ Rural Addition A~count to the Enos Church Road Recreational Aoce~ A~o~ for settlsment of an outstanding right-of-way acquisition. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegat~, Mr. Daniel and Mr. ~ayes. Absent: ~. c~rin. adopted the following resolution: Route 647 has been relocated), Project 0678-020-174, C504~ as constructed and approved by the S~ate Highway Co~missloner, locanicn of Route 678~ i.e., Section 1 ~how~ in yellow on the Relocation and Construction on Route 67S, ~roject 1990, a total distance of 0.10 mile, doms no~ serve a public discontinued from the Secondary System of State Kighway pursuant to Section 33.1-150 ~f the Cod~ ~f Virginia of ~950, amended; AND FURTHER, that portion of old location of Rou~a 678, in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on ROUt~ 678, Proje¢~ 0675-0~0-17~, CSO~' dated at Richmond, Virqinia~ March 9, 1990, a total distance of 0.07 mile, does Highway pursuant to Section ~.1-150 of the Co~e o~ Virginia i.e., $co~ion 3 shown in orange on the sketch ~itled, "Chanqes Virginia, ~arch 9, 1990, a total distance of 3.26 mile, 91-358 5/22/91 continues to serve hhe public, and should be rent, feared in Secondary System of State Highway pursusnt to Section 33.1-229 AI~D FURTHER, that p~rtion of old lo6ation of Route 647, i.e., section 4 shown in yellow on the sketch titled, "Changes on Roate 678, Project 0678-020-174, C504," dated at Richmond~ Virginia, March 9, 1990, a total distance cf 0.0S mile, dues not ~erve a public Convenience warranting its maintenance and is to be discontinued £rom the secondary system oZ state ~ighway pursuant to Section 33.1-150 of the Code of Virginia of i~O~ amended; AI~D FURTHER, that portion of old location of Route 678, the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 678, Project 0675-020-174, C504," ~ated a~ Richmond, Virginia~ March 9, 1990~ a t~tal distanc~ of 0-10 ~ile, be and hereby is ad,ed to ~he Secondary System of State Highway pursuant to Section ]3.1-~9 Of the Code of Virginia of 1950, amended; AND FURTHER, that Dortion of secondary Route 678, i.e., Section $ as shown in red on the ~ketch titled, ~Changee in t~e Secondary system Due to Relocatiun and Construction on Route 67~, ~roject 0678-0~0-174, C~04," dated a~ Richmond, Virginla~ Mar~h 9, 1990~ a t~tal distance of 0.07 mile, be and hereby i~ adde~ to the Secondary System of State Highway ~ur~uant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia of 1950~ amended; AND FURTHER, that portion of $~¢ondary Route ~47, i.e., section 7 as shown in red on the sketch titled, "c~anges in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route S?8, Project 0678-020-174, C504,~ dated ut Richmond, Virginia, ~arch 9, 1~90, a te~al distance of 0.28 mile, be and hereby is added to the Secondary System of State ~ighway pursuant to section 3~.1-219 Of the Code of Virginia of 1950, amended; A~D FURTHER, that portion of Secondary Route 647, i.~., Section 8 ae shown ~n r~d on the sketch titled~ "changes in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Cc~$truotton on Route S78, Project 0678-020-174, C504," dated st Richmond~ Virginia, March 9, 19~0, s total distance of 0.05 mile, be and hereby is added to the secondary Sy~te~ of State Highway ~ursuant to Section ~3.1-229 of the Code of Virginia of Ayes: ~r. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate~ ~r. Daniel and Mr. Absent~ Mr. Currin. ll...~..3._h=~[~R. ARROWFIEid]ROAD ~n motion of ~r. Daniel, ~e~onded by ~r. ~pplegate, the Board adopted the following re~olutlon: ~6ERF~AS, Construction of Route I~ Project 0Q01-106-105; C~01 and 0001-0~0-111, CS01, as constructed and approved by the state Highway co~is~ione~ necessitates o~anqes KOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that ~ortiun of ul~ location Route ~133, i.e.~ Section 1 shown in blue on sketch titled, "cha~g~s in the Primary an~ Secondary O0Qi-iQ6-1Qh, C50l and 0001-020-111, C~01,'~ dated at Ri~mond, Virginia, J~n~ 20, 1990~ a total distance of 0.03 mile, does not serve a public conv~nienc~ warranting i~s maintenance and iS to bs discontinued from the Secondary System of State Highway p~uant te Section 33.1-150 of the Code ef Virginia of 1950, amended; AND FURTHER, that portion of Secondary Route ii33, i.e., Section ~ as shown in red en the sketch titled, "Changem in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 1, Project 0001-106-I05, C501 and 0001-020-111, C501," dated at Richmend~ Virginia, Juno 20, 199G, a total distance of ~.03 mile, be and hereby is added to the Secondary Syet~m of State ~fghway pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia of 19SO, amended. Ayes: l~r. Sullivan, Mr. Applsgate, Mr. Daniel andMr. Mayas. Absent: Mr. Currin. ~1..~4. A~PROVALOF CHA~G~ ll.~,4.a, ~ORROAD IMI~ROF~ENTS AT On motion of ~. Daniel, ~eco~ed by Mr. ADplegate, the ~oard authorized the County Administrator to ex, cute a ~ange in the amount of ~14,704, for costs of designs of road improv~ents at the Northern ~ea L~ndfill to J. K. ,Ti~on~ and Associates, Inc. (It ia n~t~d sui~ fun~s will come from the Not,etD ~a Landfill Cell Construction Account.) Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate, Mr, Daniel add ~. Absent: ~. Currin. ll.B.4.b. FOR PUBLIC SAF~T¥ TRAINING On motion of Mr. Denis1, ~econded by ~r. Ap~legate, the Board authorized the County Administrator to exeoutea Change Order, in the amount of $12,Q00, for the Public Safety TrainiBg Building Communication Cantor wing to the Mo~eley ~roup. (It is noted said £un~s will come from the Expansion of the Co~unications center~ Ayes: ~r. SulliYan, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Daniel and ~Lr. Mayas. AJosent: Mr. ~urrin. 11.B.5. ~TATE~OAD ACC~T~%NCE Thi~ day tho County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Beard, made report in %Titing upon examination o£ Whitspine Road and a portion of Belmont Road (relocated), Dale District. U~on oenzideration whereof, and en motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. ARplegate, it is r~solved that Whitepine Road and a Do~tion of Belmont Read {~slooated), Dale Di~t~ict~ be An~ bm it ~urther resolved, Lhat the Virginia Dm~artment Transportation~ b~ and it h~r~by i~ re~ested to take into th~ of existing ~itepine Road, Chssterfleld County Industrial westerly 0.1~ mile, then turning and go~ng northwesterly 0.20 ~il~, tk~n turninq and going w~sterly 0,47 mile, then turning and go~ng northwesterly 0.13 ni~e to %h~ int~r~ctlon w~th BelmOnt Road (relocated), then =ontinuing northwesterly mile to ti~ into ~xi~ting B~l~ont Roa~, ~tat~ ~oute ~; and Belmont Road (relo=ated), beginning at th~ intersection with ~fteplne Roa~ a~d going northeasterly 0.04 mile to tie into existing Belmont Rond, Stat~ Route 651. 91-360 5/22/91 Thi~ request is inclusive of the adjacent ~l~pe, sight distance and designated virginia Department of Tran~pcrtation These roads serve as access ~o adjacent commersiat properties. And be it £urther reselved, that the BGard of supervisors guarsntee~ to the virginia Department of Transportation a 60' to 100' variable width ripht-of-way for Whitepine Read and a 90' right-of-way for Belmont Road (relocated). This section of W~itepine Road Extended and a Portion of Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate, mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes. Absent: Mr. Currin. ll.B.6.a. FOR T~ BRANDE~ILL ~IT~ 0n motio~ of M~. Daniel, aeconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved a request for a permit by the Brandermill Community Association to stage a flrework~ display at the Sunday Park area of Brande~ill~ on July 4~ 1991 (ralndate July 6~ 1991)~ which re,est i~ s~bject to approval by ~he Firm Department an~ the County Attorney~ Ayes: Mr. Sullivan~ Mr. Applegate~ Mr. Daniel and ~, ~nont: Mr. CurriD. On $otio~ of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved a reguest for a permit by ~r. Geerge F. ~oov~r te stage u fireworks display at ~ Bellona Arsenal, on ~uly 4, 19~1 (raindate July 5, or 6, 1991), which request i~ ~ubj~ct to approval by the Fire D~partment and the County Attorney's Ayes: Mr. sullivan, ~r, Appleqate, Mr. Dani~! and Mr. ~ayes. Absent: Mr. Currin. ll.B.7. REOIIESTFOR BINGO/RAFFL~PE~9~T On motion of Kr. Daniel, sessnded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved a raffle permit for L. C. Bird ~usio ~oosters for calendar year 1991. Ayes: Mr, S~lliva~, ~r. Applagat~, Mr. Duniel and Mr. Muye~. Absent: Mr. Currin, ,11~B~.__l~]NDIN~.,,F~R ARCKAEOLOG¥ S-ruuY AT EPPTNGTON PLANTATION On motion of ~. Daniel, seconded by ~. kpplegate, the Board ~ransf~rred $~5~o0~ from ~he 19~5 ~R~0R0a Park Bond P=ojeot to ~und ~ Ph~e I Archaeological Field ~t~dy ~t ~ppiDgton Plantation~ which study will identify archaeological features that exist around the house, allowing staff to plan and execute future repairs to the Plantation and to hel~ better interpret the house and surrounding grounds. (It is noted ~avings incurre~ from co~tructln~ fmcilitle~ in-housm with Ayes: ~. Sullivan, Kr. Applsgate, Mr. D~nisl and Mr. Mayes. Absent: Mr. C~rri~, 11.B.9.a. TO CONEIDER AMENDING ARTICL~ IV_OF_~E WA~ ~ INDU~TRLP/. WAST~ INTO THE ~3BLIC S~W~R ~S~ On motion of Mr. Daniel, ssconded by ~r. ADpleg=tm, th~ Soard hearing to con~ider amendin~ Article IV of the Water and Sewer Ordinance, relating ~o the discharge of industrial wastm into Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, ~. Applega=e, ~. Daniel and ~. Hayes. Absent: ~. Currin. ll.B.9.o. TO CONSID~ ~d~ OHUIN~CE FOR I~'~%-.NC"'I%~.-'~ SANITARY WASTE on motion of Mr. uaniel, ~e¢onde~ by Kr. Apple~ete, the Board set the date cf Sune 1l, 1991 ut 6:30 p.m. for u public hearing to consider an ordinance for franchising sanitary waste haulers. Ay~: ~tr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes. Absent: M~. Coffin. ]~LAN BY On motion of Mr. Dani%I, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board adopte4 =he following resolution: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A DEFEND CONPENSATION P~N FOR ~E CO~TY W~R~A~ the County of Chesterfield <"Count~~) has to be made available to all eligible County Revenue Code pe~itting such Plans; and ~R~S, certain tax b~neflts could accrue to ~mployees, officials and officers participating in sai~ WH~S, such b~n~fits will act as incentives to Co~ty emDloye~s, officials and officers to voluntarily set aside and invest portions of their currsnt incomm to meet their future financial re~ir~m%ntz and suDplement their County retirement member countie=, 9~rmitting it~ member counties and e~ploy~e~ offioial~ a~d ~fficer~ to e~joy t~e adva~tage~ Chis Pro,ram; and ~S~ by a~op~iun uf the NACo Program, all operational, administrative and fiduciary responsibilities are h~r~by a~um~d by NACo on behalf of the County; and ~S, NAto, as Plan A~inistrator~ agrees to hold harmle~ and indemnify ~ County amd it~ ~ployeem, a~d officers from any loss resultln~ from NACo or its Agent's fa/lure to p~rfo~ ~t~ duti~ and ~ervioe~ p~r~uant to NACo Program; NOW~ T~EREPORE~ T~E BO~D OF SUPERVISORS OF ~E CO~TY 91-362 5/22/91 The Board hereby &do, ts the ~ational Association of Counties Deferred Compensation Program and hereby establishes voluntary participation of all eligible county employeee~ officials and officers. ..The County Administrator ia hereby authorized to execute for Yhe county, individual participation agreements with each said employee, official and officer requesting same~ and to act as the "Administrator" of the Plan repreEentlng fhe County, and to ~x~eute ~ueh agreements and contract~ as are necessary to implement the program subject to approval by the County Attorney. It is implicitly understood that, other than the incidental expenses of collecting and matters, there shall be nu cast to the County for the program. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate, ~r. Daniel and Mr. ~ay~. Absent: Mr. Currin. ~OI~5~T~K~RESCIIE S~U~ ~ USE ~SI~AT~ P~ING $~S AT ~ ~0~R0~ F~ STATION 0n motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, th~ Board granted a par~ing easement to ~e Forest View Volunteer Rescue Squad for twelve undesignate~ parking spaces a~ the suford Road Fir~ Station, which are in excess to the Fire Depar~ent'~ par~ing s~ace requirements. (It is noted that when ~e Fo~e~t Vie~ Volunteer Rescue S~nd pur~us~ cunst~ction of parking on other adjau~n% property, th~ easement wall terminate.} Ayes: Mr. ~ullivan, Mr. kpplegate, Hr. Daniel and Mr. ~ayms. A~ment: ~. C~rln. 11.~.9.b. TO ~NSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AM~N~ 'rnK ~DR OF 'r~ CO~ OF CHE~ERFI~o 1978. AS A/4ENDED. BY T~ RITIN~ OF ~LID W~TE ~A~ FA~LITI~ On ~OtiO~ of ~r. Applegate, ~econd~d by Mr. Daniel, the Board deferred settin~ the date fur a ~ub!ic h~aring ~o c~nslder an ordinance to amend th% Coda of t~e county of Chesterfield, 197~, as amended, by amending and reenacting Seotio~ 10-40 ~lating to =ha ~iting of ~olid waste managsment facilities untll June 12, 1991 a= 6:30 Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Kr. Applegats, Mr. Daniel and Mr. ~ayes. A~nt: ~. Coffin. AND SET DATE FOR PUBLIC Mr. Micas stated that in deferrin~ the applicability of the Chesapeake ~ay ordinance, as well as a~op~ing the budget~ there had been some confusion as to the applicable for the review of eroaion an~ ae~iment control Dlan~ ~etween the preaent tine and the beginning of the fiscal year in July. ~OW and ~uly ~, 1991, the f~ for r~view would be SRO0 and beginning July 1~ 1991~ the fee for review would be $1~000 and recommended adoption of the ordinance on an emergency basis to clarify the dates for ~he fee. On motion of Mr. Daniel, ~eco~d~d by Mr. Applegat~, the Board adopted, on an emergency basle, the fol]owlng ordinance and ~e~ ~he date of June 26, 1991 at 9:0~ a.m. for a public hearing 40 eonside~ readoptien of the ordinance: AN OPd>INANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUI~TY OF dHERTERFIELB, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY A~NDING A~D REENACTING SECTION 7.2-9 RELATING TO EROSION AND SEOINENT CONTROL BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of dheeterfield County: (1) That Section 7.2-9 of Chapter 7.~ cf the Code of the County af Chesterfield, 1978, aa amended, is amended and reenacted a~ follows: ~eo. 7.2-9. Fees. A program sdminls=ra=ios fee of eight hundred dog,ars ($8~0.00) shall b~ paid to the coUnty at the time of f~ling of each er~slon and sedim~n~ control plan for review. (2) This ordinance shall be effective through June Ayes: ~r. ~ullivan, Mr. Applegate, ~r. Damiel and Mr. 11.G.~. A~P~K)VALOPVHDA FI~A~CINGFORTH~a?3ARDCO~E ~. Nica~ ~tated that ~DA had informed the County that they ~lan to finance %he Mallard Gore Apartment project on Price Club Boulevard. ~e stated the project ha~ been zoned and site plan approved and ~at staff would recommend ~at the Board con~ider each 9roject on a ca~ by ~$~ basis, as done in th~ past. There was brief discussion relative to past action of ~QaX~ On ~DA p~oj~c%$ a~d low-i~co~e financing projects general~ on motion of ~. Mayes~ seconded by Mr. ~ullivan, ~e Board decided to ta~e no ac=ion regarding ~DA financing for the ~al]ard Cov~ Aperients on Price Club Boulevard. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, ~. Appl~gate, ~. Daniel and ~. Mayas. Absent: ~. Curr~n. l~.C. ~TILITIES D~PARTMENT ITEMS ll.C.i. COWSID~RP~3RCHASE OF 5.5 AC~ES FOR CHF~TE~FIEI~ LANDFILL PROJECT F~O~ MS. ELI~k~fLG~El%%NN AND After some discussion, it was on motio~ of ~. Applegate, seconded by Mr. oaniel, the Board a~rove~ a oontraot to purchase ~.5 aor~, more or less, for th~ Chester L~n~fill Project from M~. Elizmbmth G. Hage~nn and Mm. ~na J. ~agmmann, Ta~ Map ~ll~-l~(l)~l, at ~ appralmed amount of $I4,300.00 and authorized the County Administrator to execute the neoe~a~ contract and de~d, accepting ~e~ on ~half of ~ County. (It ~ noted a cody of ~e plat i~ filed with the AyeS~ M~. Sullivan, Mr, Applegutu and Mr, Duniel. Abstention: Mr. Mayes. Absant~ ~, Curtis. 91-364 5/Z2/91 0~ motion Of ~r. Daniel, secsndsd by Mr. Ap~leqats, the Board aorea of land known as ~a~ehurst Driver fro~ Pagehur~t Corp., which parcel is necessary to provide access to Cheltingham et Salisbury Development and authorized the County Administrator plat is tiled with the papers of this Board.) Ayes~ M~. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate, Mr, Daniel and Hr. Mayas. Absent; Mr. Currln. ]l.C.2.b. CONSID~ATION OF R~OUEST FROM V/RG~ POWER FOR ~$$IO~TO INSTALL DRIVEWAY II~PROVI~[EI~T$ IN AN ~X~S~ING. 60..FOOTANDV~RIABLE~IDTHRI~r-OF-WAY TO S~ ~GINIA POW~ ~ S~STATION on motion of Mr. Da~iel~ seconded by ~r. Applegate~ the Board a~proved a request from Virginia Power to install driveway i~provement~ w~thin an e~i~ting 60' and variable width unlm~roved right-of-way to serv~ the Virginia Power Trabue Substation, sub~ect to the execution of a license a~ee~e~t. (It is noted a cody of the plat is filed with the papers of ~is Board.) Ayes: ~. Sullivan, ~. Applegate~ Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mnye~. A~sent: ~. Curtis. APPROVAL OF ~TILITIRS CONTRACT FOR ~RGINTA PAINT COMPANY. ROUTE 360 on motion Of ~r. oaniel, seconded by Mr. ADplegate, the ~eard approved Utilities Contract for Virginia Paint Company - Route 360, Project Number 89-02~8, as follows, which project inolude~ the e~ten~ion of ~9~ L,F-! of 8" off~it~ wa~tewater l~nas which will provid~ service to the adjo~ninq p~eporties and ~uthorised the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents: Developer: C.M. Partnership and virginia Paint company Contractor: Uamss River ~xcavating, Inc. Contract Amount: Estimated Total - $56,985.00 Wastewater (offsite) - $ 3,870.30 (Refund tb_ru connections) ~stimated Developer Cost: $53,114.70 Code: (O£Ssi~e) 5P-583~0-8~0733~ Ayes: Mr. Sullivan~ Mr. Applegate, Mr- Daniel and Hr, Haya~, Absent: ~r. Currln. authorized the County Admini~trato~ to execute a Chanqe 0rden, in the amount of $49,360.00, for the Customer Utility Billing Info,eriCh System (CUBIS) Contract with computer Sy~t~n~ and modification~ required to int~rfac~ with the Trea=urer'~ re, ired polioie~ and pr~c~du~ inherent with the present billing ~y~t~N. (It i~ noted said funds for this project are appropriated in tke cuFFent Operating Budget.) Ayes: ~r. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayas, Abment: Mr. Currin. 11.C.2.e. A~PROVALOF c~L%wcg O~D~FORT~EUPPER ~:...~.~..~.. ~ATION O~ motion of ~. Daniel, seconded by ~. Appl~ate, ~e Board au~crizad the County Administrator to execute Chang~ Order N~ber ~o, in th~ a~ount ~f $204,316.0'0, for the UDDer Swift ~eek P~D station Contract Number 85-7098, Par~ B, for changes in estimated quantities to actual quantities to final handle low flows ut pres=nC time to avoid d~age to pump station an~ ~avings in o~eration; and for installation of air handling units n~bers 1, 2 a~d 3 fo~ olimatic control of t~9=raCure an~ moisture for =he protection of high ~=h computers and control~ at p~p station. (It is noted maid funds for thi~ proj~ct are agprcpriated in the cur=ant capital Ayes: ~r. Sullivan, ~. Applegate, Mr. Danlel and ~. Hayes. Absent= ~. Currin. Xl.t.~.f- CONSID~/~OUEST FROM VIRGINIA POWER On motion of Mr. Daniel, ~eoond~ by ~r. Applegate, the Board approved a request from Virginia Power to in,tall underground oaDl~ wizh~n unimproved ahead street in chef=er subdivizion to serve a home at 3~01 Snead Street, subject to the e~ec~tion ~f a license agreement. (I~ is noted a Gopy of %he plat is f~led with tbs papers of th~s Board.) Ayes: ~. Sullivan, Mr. Appleg~=e, Mr. Daniel and Mr, ~s~t: ~. Currin. ll.C.F. F~ORTS ~r. sale presen=a~ the Board ~i~ a repsr~ on the developer water and sewer contructs executed by the Co~ty Administrator. Mr. Ramsay presented the Board with a status repo~t on the General Fund Contingency Account; General Fund Balance; Reserve for Future Capital Projects; District Road and Street Light Funds; and Lease Purchases. seeking re-election in November because ~e planned to marry and would net be residing in Clover ~ilI Dimtrict. ~e mtated that he felt Chars had been major accomplishments during his ~ervice to the County ~uch a~ acquiring a fin~ transportation system, specifically the Powhite Parkway E~tension; meuthern Route ~R to 1-95, the Varina ~non ~ri~ge, an4 the Ettrick Overpass; the apenin~ last fell of the new Co%t~ta Building; amd othex improvements ~o the County ~uch as new fire statio~, new libraries, a new public Health und Humun Services Building ~esded to ~eet the increasing needs of citizens and that he hmd participated in regional projects such as th~ Diamond, the Pert Authority, and the Richmend 5/22/91 International Airport. He ~teted that h~ oerved in various commission, the Richmond Metropolitan Transportation Planning Orgunization, the Metropolitan Economic Development Council, the James River Port study Committee, the virginia ~unioipal League Legislative Committee, etc. always representing all of the citizens Of the County in the bast possible manner. He districtt Clover Kill~ g~ew at th~ fast,et rate and had promoted econemiQ dev¢lopment in the County. Re expressed his sincere appreeiati0~ to all the County staff and the citizens of Chesterfield County ~er their centinue~ support ~uring his tenure on the Board. The Soar~ recessed at ll:0O a.m. (DST) to travel to Pete's Flight Line Restaurant (Airport). The Board met for lunch with Dr, M~r~all W, S~it~, President of John Tyler Community College, ~r. ~aok How~, General William Curry, and Dr. George Puffin, Chesterfield'~ representatives to the Jehn Tyler Community college Local R~Q~ST FOR ~O~IL~ ~OM~ P~ITS kND REZONtNG Tn ~atoaca Nagi~t~rlal District, GL~ ~OW~ ~A ~W recessed renewal of Nobil~ Ho~e ~e~it 85SR020 to park a mobile home in a R~idea%iml (R-7] District. The ~mnsity of of 1.51 to 4.00 units/acre. Thi~ property f~ont~ the west llne of Ferndale Avenue, approzimataly 438 feet south of Hagood Street, ~nd is b~tt~r R~OW~ as 21700 Fer~dmle Avenue. Tax ~ap 186-3 (2) Augustis Wrigh=, Lot I5 (Sheet 52). The Mr. Jacobsen presented a sugary of Case 9~SR0186 and stated On motion of Mr. May~, ~eoondod by ~r. ApD1egate~ ~e Board following conditions: rental property. Only on~ (1) mobile b0~ shall b~ permitted %o be parked on an individual lot or parcel. and uther zoning requirements of the appllcabl~ zoning home shall bm located closer than 20 fe~t to may ~xi~tlng 4. 20 additional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home. All mobile homes shall be skirted but shall not be placed on a permanent foundation. Where public (county) water and/er sewer are available, 6. ~pen being g~anted a Mobile Home P~rmi%, the aDpl~sant shall then obtain the necessary permits from the office of the Building official. This shall be done prior ~O the installation or relocation of th~ mobile home. 7. Any vislation o~ the abowe conditions m~all be ~rounds £or revocation o~ ~ ~sbila ~ome ~ermit. Ayes: ~r. Sullivan, ~r. Ap~le~atm~ Kr. Daniel and Mr. Mayas. Absent: ~r. Currin. 905N0188 (Amended) In Clover Hill Magisterial District! BRADL~U~ IN%q:S~9~T$, ~. requested rezonlng from Residential Towr~ouse (R-~) ~o Neighborhood office (0-1). The dens~ty of sush amendment will bs ¢on~rolled by zoning ~onditions or Ordinance standards. The Compr~h~nsiv~ Plan desiqnates the property for a mi~e~ use corridor with density ~o De ~eter~in~d by development ra~ulations. Thim request llem on a 0.8 acre parcel fronting approximately ~0 ~eet en the north llne of Hull Street Road, across fre~ Ashlars Parkway. Tax Ma~ 75-1 (1) Parcel 26 (s~e~t ~0). Mr. JaCObSen stated staff had received a letter from t-he applicant requesting withdrawal of CaSe 90~N0188. There wa~ no one present to address this matter. On motion of ~r. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, th~ Board aooepted withdrawal of Came 90SN0188. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan~ Mr. Applegate, Mr. Daniel and Mr, Hayes, Absent: ~Lr. currin. 89SN0354 (Amended} Iu ~idlothian Magisterial Districf~ VIRGINIA ~ re,us=ted rezonlng from Agricultural (A) te Residential (R-15). Residential use of up to 2.9 units per acre is permitted in a Residential (R~i~) District. The Comprehensive Plan desiqnate~ t~a p~eperty for ~sid~ntial use of 2.2 units per a~re or loss. This request lies on a a~6.s acre p~rcel fronting approximately 1,637 feet on ~e west li~ of old Hundred Read~ approximately 3,780 feet not,wes% of otterdale Mr. Jacobsen presented a eummmry of Case 895N0354 and ninety day deferral and that representatives of the n~ighborhood who hays been ~orking with the applicant also ~upport~d th~ d~f~rral. Mr. Kugh Woodle, representing the neighborhood, =tared ~_hey supported the deferral and have be~n working with developer ~n reachlnq agreement~ concerning the project. Hoard deferred Ca~e 89SN0354 until August 28, 1991. Ayes: ~. Sullivan, Mr. ADDlegate, ~. Daniel and ~. Mayas. ~smnt: Mr. Coffin. 91-368 5/22/91 91SN0111 In Clover Hilt ~agi~t~ial Dietrich, LASALLE ~ ~, A C~.OUX~ TRUST requested razening from Residential (R-7) to Regional B~si~es5 (C-4). The density cf such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or ordinance standard~. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for commercial u~ wi~h density to be da~ermined by development regulation~o This request lies on ~.9 acres fronting approximately ~20 fee~ on the we~t llne of Statview Lane, approximately 3~0 feet north of Cloverleaf Drive. Ta~ ~ap ~9-2 {1) Parcels 3, 4 and 5 (Sheet 9). Mr. Saoobson presented a summary of Case 91S~0141 and stated the ~lannlng Commission recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered condition. Mr. John Cogbill, representing th~ applicant, ~tated the recommendation was acceptable. There wa~ no opposition present. On motion of ~r. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayas, tho Scard approved Case 9isN0141 and accepted t~e following proffered condition: In order to reduce tho traffic impact of this ~ezoning, the property will be used for customer/employee parking and for access te the Mall only. Ayes: Er. Sul~ivan~ Nr. Applegate, Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayer. 91Sli'0162 ~n Be~uda ~agiaterial Dis:rict~ THE C/I~S~_~i~q.~ COUNTY PLANIV/NG C~D~4ISSION requested re~anlng from Agricultural to Ligh~ Industrial (I-1). The density of much amendment will be controlled by zoning coDdition~ or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property fur general industrial ~e with ~ensity to be determined by development regulations. Thi~ r~que~t lieu on 0.59 acres fronting Road, approximately 1,640 feet east of Allied Road. Ta~ Map 1~7-1 (1) Part of Parcel 2 (sheet 43). ~r. Jacobsen presented a summary of case 91SN0162 end stated Mr. Daniel dlgcloged to the Board that he and his employer had participated in discueeion~ regarding this case, declared a Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting. Ayes: Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Applegate and Mr. After brief discussion, on motion of Mr. Applegate, ssoon~d by ~2. Daniel, t~e Board adjourned at 2:30 p.m. (DST) until 92-369 5/~/~1 ~ay 2~, 1~1 ~t ~:00 ~.m. (DST) in Koom 502 of the A~inistratlon Building. Ayes: F~C. Sulllvan, Mr. Appleqate, Mr. Daniel and /4r. MUyeS. Absant: Mr. Currin. 91-370 5/22/91