Loading...
2010-03-24 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~, Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 2.A. Subject: County Administrator's Report County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: The County Administrator will update the Board on the progress of various projects as requested by the Board of Supervisors. Preparers Marilyn Cole Title: Assistant County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No OiDOfl~1 County Administrator's Top 40's List I. II. Critical Proiects/Activities 1. Airport Entrance Improvements 2. Airport Master Plan 3. Amelia Reservoir Project 4. Animal Shelter Issues 5. Census 2010 6. Community Risk Analysis/Emergency Service Coverage 7. Countywide Comprehensive Plan/Public Facilities Plan 8. Eastern Midlothian Re-development - Chippenham Square - Spring Rock - Stonebridge (formerly Cloverleaf Mall) - Streetscaping 9. Hydrilla Issue 10. Irrigation Policies/Demand Management for Water Use 11. Low Impact Development Standards 12. Magnolia Green CDA 13. Mass Grading Ordinance 14. Meadowville Interchange 15. Midlothian Turnpike/Courthouse Road Streetscape Improvements (Towne Center) 16. North American Project (at Rt. 288 and Rt. 10) 17. Postal Zip Codes 18. Private Sewer Treatment Facility 19. Sign Ordinance 20. Sports Tourism Plan 21. Streetlight Policy 22. Ukrops Kicker Complex/Poseidon Swimming -Stratton Property 23. Utilities Policies and Managed Growth 24. Woolridge Road Reservoir Crossing Project Ongoing Proiects/Activities 1. Capital Improvement Program 2. Capital Regional Collaborative Focus Group 3. Citizen Budget Advisory Committee 4. Efficiency Studies -Countywide 5. Federal Stimulus Package - Energy Block Grant - Economic Development - Police Department - Recovery Zone Bonds 6. Financial/Budget Issues 7. Fort Lee Expansion 8. Joint Meetings of Board of Supervisors/School Board 9. RMA Work Group O~®~~2 Page 1 of 4 Updated - 3/18/2010 County Administrator's Top 40's List 10. RRPDC -Large Jurisdiction Committee 11. RRPDC -Transportation Strategies Work Group (work on hold) 12. UASI (Regional) 13. Upper Swift Creek Water Quality Ordinances 14. Watkins Centre III. Completed Proiects/Activities 1. Board's Appointments Process - 8/2008 2. Business Climate Survey - 2/2009 3. Cash Proffers 4. CBLAB Discussions -12/2009 5. Citizen Satisfaction Survey - S/2009 6. COPS Grants 7. Efficiency Studies -Fire Department and Fleet Management - 6/2008 8. Efficiency Study -Quality/Chesterfield University Consolidation - 7/2009 9. Electronic Signs -1/2010 10. Board's Emergency Notification Process 11. Employee Health Benefits -Contract Renewal - 8/2009 12. Financial/Budget Issues - Adoption of 2010 Budget - 4/2009 - Adoption of County CIP - 4/2009 - Adoption of School CIP - S/2009 - Bond Issue/Refinancing - AAA Ratings Retained 13. 457 Deferred Comp Plan (Approved) 14. Hosting of Hopewell Website 15. Impact Fees for Roads - 9/2008 16. In Focus Implementation - Phase I - 8/2008 17. In-Focus Implementation -Phase II (Payroll/HR) -12/2009 18. Insurance Service Upgrade (ISO) for Fire Department - 9/2009 19. Leadership Exchange Visits with City of Richmond 20. Legislative Program - 3/2009 21. 2010 Legislative Program - 3/2010 22. Meadowdale Library -11/2008 23. Minor League Baseball (new team) - 2/2010 24. Multi-Cultural Commission (Quarterly Reports due to Board) -11/2008 25. Planning Fee Structure (General Increases) - 6/2009 26. Planning Fee Structure (Reductions for In-Home Businesses) -1/2009 27. Planning Fees (Holiday for Commercial Projects) - 8/2009 28. Potential Legislation -Impact Fees/Cash Proffers -1/2009 29. Property Maintenance -Proactive Zoning Code Enforcement (countywide) - 2/2009 30. Property Maintenance -Rental Inspection Program 31. Public Safety Pay Plans Implemented (Phase I) 32. Redistricting 2011 Calendar/Process Report ~~®~~~ 33. Regional Workforce Investment Initiative 34. Southwest Corridor Water Line - Phase I - 7/2008 Page 2 of 4 Updated - 3/18/2010 County Administrator's Top 40's List 35. Sports Tourism Program with Metropolitan Richmond Sports Backers - 8/2009 36. Ukrops Kicker Complex -soccer fields -Opened 8/2009 37. Upper Swift Creek Plan (Adopted) - 6/2008 38. VDOT Subdivision Street Acceptance Requirements - 7/2009 39. Walk Through Building Permit Process -10/2009 40. Website Redesign - 6/2009 41. Wind Energy Systems - 3/10/2010 42. Wireless Internet Access in County Facilities - 9/2008 43. Bow Hunting Restrictions - 2/24/2010 ®~®~~~ Page 3 of 4 Updated - 3/18/2010 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 5.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Forrest Clapp and Dr. Betty Hunter-Clapp for Their Many Contributions to Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Warren requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt this resolution recognizing the many contributions of Mr. and Mrs. Forrest Clapp to Chesterfield County. Summary of Information: Mr. and Mrs. Clapp are longtime residents of the Brandermill community, where they have worked tirelessly as community leaders for the betterment of Brandermill and all of Chesterfield County for the past 29 years. They will be moving to a retirement community in Richmond, Virginia, in April of 2010. Preparers Don Kappel Title: Director, Public Affairs Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # (~~O~D~S RECOGNIZING MR. FORREST CLAPP AND DR. BETTY HUNTER-CLAPP FOR THEIR MANY CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, Mr. Forrest Clapp and Dr. Betty Hunter-Clapp have been residents of Chesterfield County since 1981; and WHEREAS, Mr. Clapp was the major fundraiser for the Hands Across the Lake organization and worked tirelessly to protect the county's Swift Creek Reservoir; and WHEREAS, he also volunteered at McGuire VA Hospital for many years, providing transportation for patients; and WHEREAS, Mr. Clapp represented his Shallowford Trace neighborhood in Brandermill, and taught Sunday School at the Brandermill Church, where he also served on the Adult Ministries Committee; and WHEREAS, Dr. Betty Hunter-Clapp co-founded and was co- chairman of the Hands Across the Lake organization; and WHEREAS, she provided valuable, detailed information at numerous Board of Supervisors meetings over many years as she worked to educate county leaders, and the public, about the importance of protecting the county's valuable drinking-water resources; and WHEREAS, Dr. Hunter-Clapp's involvement with Hands Across the Lake led to the development of the Brandermill Church's "Caring for Creation" ministry; and WHEREAS, Dr. Hunter-Clapp also served from July 1999 until June 2003 as a valued member of the Chesterfield County Health Center Commission; and WHEREAS, she also was a member of the Lucy Corr Foundation Arts Committee, and in that capacity, worked to obtain contributions and exhibits from local artists to bring joy to the residents of Lucy Corr Village; and WHEREAS, Dr. Hunter-Clapp was the impetus behind the successful acquisition of grants for Lucy Corr's Wellness Garden; and WHEREAS, together, in these and numerous other selfless ways, Mr. and Mrs. Clapp have been exemplary citizens and have worked diligently to improve the quality of life for all Chesterfield County residents; and ®~~~~~ WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Clapp will be moving in April 2010 to a retirement community in Richmond, Virginia; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to acknowledge gratefully the generous service they have provided to others for so many years, and in so many ways. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 24th day of March 2010, hereby recognizes the many outstanding contributions of Mr. and Mrs. Forrest Clapp to Chesterfield County, Virginia, and expresses, on behalf of the residents of Chesterfield County, its appreciation for their leadership, caring, wisdom and dedication, and extends all best wishes for a long, happy and healthy retirement. ~~®®~~ _ ~ ,~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 5.6. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Mr. Millard D. "Pete" Stith, Jr., Deputy County Administrator for Community Development, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Mr. Millard D. "Pete" Stith, Jr. will retire on April 1, 2010 after 26 years of service to Chesterfield County. Preparers Mr. Russell Harris Attachments: ^ yes Title: Manager, Community Development Services No #0~00~8 RECOGNIZING MR. MILLARD D. "PETE" STITH, JR., DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Millard D. "Pete" Stith, Jr. joined Chesterfield County in 1984, as Executive Assistant to the County Administrator for Intergovernmental Affairs and then served for five years as Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation; and WHEREAS, as Executive Assistant to the County Administrator for Intergovernmental Affairs, Mr. Stith worked with the state police Med-Flight program to get assistance with funding from MCV, Richmond, Henrico and other surrounding localities, making the Med- Flight program a regional initiative; and WHEREAS, as instrumental in Plantation and construction by first community Henricus; and Director of Parks and Recreation, Mr. Stith was the acquisition and development of Eppington Henricus Historical Park, as well as the the United States Navy Seabees of the county's center in Bensley Park and the floating dock at WHEREAS, Mr. Stith was instrumental in the creation of Chesterfield County's annual Black History Month program, a nationally recognized celebration involving concerts featuring nationally known performing artists; arts, education and entertainment festivals; and scholarships for Chesterfield County students; and WHEREAS, Mr. Stith became Deputy County Administrator for Community Development in 1992, overseeing the departments of Building Inspections, Economic Development, Environmental Engineering, Planning, Utilities, Transportation and the office of Community Development Block Grants; and WHEREAS, Mr. Stith fostered within the Community Development Division a cooperative, innovative, team-oriented work environment that improved the working relationships between Community Development departments and their customers; and WHEREAS, Mr. Stith was instrumental in guiding Chesterfield County through the challenges of so-called "shrink-swell soil," confederate history, and the planning and implementation of the Community Development Customer Service Center; and WHEREAS, Mr. Stith directed interdepartmental process- improvement teams including representatives from the Virginia Department of Transportation and Fire and Life Safety to develop and implement site-plan process enhancements such as fast-track review, table review and minor site-plan approval, which vastly improved Chesterfield County's competiveness in economic development; and ®~®~~~ WHEREAS, during his tenure as Deputy County Administrator for Community Development, the announced economic development investments in Chesterfield County exceeded $2.6 billion, including some 310 projects and the creation of more than 18,000 jobs; and WHEREAS, Mr. Stith encouraged the organization of numerous citizen and business groups to revitalize their neighborhoods and commercial corridors; and WHEREAS, among his many accomplishments are the receipt of an honorary doctoral degree in 2006 from Virginia State University for his many contributions to the university, and his appointment to many boards and commissions by Virginia governors, including the Board of Visitors of Virginia State University, Virginia Board of Veterinary Medicine, State Board of Dentistry and the Council on Human Resources; and WHEREAS, Mr. Stith also has represented the county on numerous boards and commissions, including the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission, the Crater Planning District Commission, Richmond MPO, Crater MPO, Stadium Operating Committee, National Association of Counties Host Conference Committee, Chippenham Johnston-Willis board of directors, and a founding member of Richmond Sports Backers, to name a few; and WHEREAS, Mr. Stith has been a generous supporter of many non- profit organizations, including the Police Foundation, the Chesterfield Employees Association, the American Heart Association and United Way; and WHEREAS, Mr. Stith has worked tirelessly to champion the concerns of the community development departments, to advise county administrators and the Board of Supervisors, and to reach out and partner with community and corporate leaders in order to resolve Chesterfield County issues. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 24th day of March 2010, publicly recognizes Mr. Millard D. "Pete" Stith, Jr. for his 26 years of distinguished service to Chesterfield County, and extends sincere best wishes for a long, healthy and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Stith and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. ®v~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~, Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: s.A. Subject: Work Session on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2011 Budget County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a work session on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2011 Budget Summary of Information: This time has been set to continue work sessions on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2011 Budget. This work session will include presentations on the Management Services Division budgets and on the Commonwealth's Attorney's budget. A final work session is scheduled for April 14th At the April 14th work session, changes to the proposed budget will be reviewed prior to adoption. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No ~-~~.~J ~ u '~ ~ ~ ~ ~" r ~ V ~ V y + ~ ~ •O ~ ~ O ~ p ~ bA ~'-~ ~, ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ce "" ~ ~ ~ 'C~ ~ ~ ~ +~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y . .~ cn •~ ~j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V A w ~ ~ ~ C7 w •.. 3 O ~ o •~ c ~ ~ ~ . V ,x ~ ~+ ~+ ~ ~ p U V V 41 H ~ •~ y ~, .~ v Cn u .~+ ~ cJ) ,, , C~ °~ ~ ~ y ~ ~.+ ~ ' ~ ~ b A ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ +~ ~ ~ " cat ~ ~ ~' i G-; .,., v .,.., w w 0 ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • bA ~ ~' O ~ G1 v ~ ~ U ~ ~ c v ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , i ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ w o ° ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ODoI~A ~ } V ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 4~ m 4~ 4~ p ~ N O ~ u~. H ~ } V ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V '~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ LL H ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ .V ._ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ 0 ~ N M 4~ s V V O V W O -~- H H (~~®~~.3 ~"~ w I ''~ •.~ '~ X W a~ bA '~ p0 'd O '~ O O N w _ ~ N ~~ ~ ~ {f} U c~ .~ ~ o N ~ X N ~ p cv ~ N U ~ ~ Q ~f O ~ O M O l~ O Q. 0 0 s v otS +~ c 0 U 0 00 ++ .-. G~ ~., .~..+ ~ V ~ ~ v ~+ ~ O "~ ~ °' ~~ •~ O r~ O N O ~-+ V w Lam, ~ ~ N O ~ G~ ~ ~ ~ 0 d: e-~ C 0 GO 0 0 c70 O et+ ~ v ..~ V C U "'' ° ` .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .N V ~ ~ ~ ~ H O ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ cn ©~®~l`~5 M • ~..~ V ~~T~ ~1 ~~ ~/V V J 0 U a~ .~ 0 O U 0 . ~..~ a~ 0 .~' V . ,'.~.~ w V •~ ~~ ~J • ~..~ ~/~ V J 0 V 0 0 .,..~ a~ a~ ~~ -J .~ .~ .,.~ .'..~ o~~~~~ ~1 ",, ~ ~ ~' .~ w ~ ,, ~ °' z ~ ~ ~ o ~' ~ •~ ~ V ~,c .o ~ ~ ~~ dJGa ~ ~ 31S3H~ c ~, ~ a~ o ~ V ~ °o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~• w .,.., 0 V V .,.., a~ 0 0 .,.., SGH~Q~S c~i V a~ v x w a~ .~ 0 .,.~ w v a~ r N r O O L a 00 O O N O LL 0~®~~.~$ O O O ~ O O O M N N ~ ~ O O ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ 6F~ d9~ {f} d~} ~ EF} d~ Cl~ U U .,.i V a~ bA bA a~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b~A ~ W ~+.~ ~ O .~ v bA ~ ~ ctt °~' bA O .,..~ b~A c~ w bA c~ cat . r..~ w .,..~ O '~ o° U 0 N .~ O O ~+-~ O u '.~ .,..~ O U U U Q~®~1.~ W A~ W V V r~ V J ~~ /~ W A~ W W i H ~ o0 ~ # N w , w ~' l 0 j ti 0 ~ N ?i r„ ^ V = II~,, Y ~ ~ N O ^ ~ ~ _~=Y -, - ~a a t~ iA O Q '~ `• C ~ r (~} C U ~ C1 N ' ' s 7 ~ ~ N ~ y4 ~ t.1 ~ 45 ~? I ~~ ~ ~ C ,- a N W ~ - O O ~~ N ~! ~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~_ _ _ ~ ~ : ~ ,~ o ,, ~~^ 0 y ~N~ l o0 o o~ ^~o .=~„ o 4~ d "~ _ N ,~ ~ T r" ~ ~ r a ( , '' i i C7 O ~ i -- .. , _ ._. ,,,... ~ N ~.~ ~ ; i. i # iL O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v O v o 0 0 0 o a a o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 1~ CO ILA * S'i N ~ O W OD r ~ ~ ~ r r r ^ r A Cl~ . ~..~ CJ~ ~i bA .~ ~+ ~+ ^~ n O v v a-+ . ~.•i ~~ .:r u .~ N .,.., .,.., .~ O v bA O .-~ O u a F .F.r Cn .~ W O .,.i ~.+ c~ w 'CS V .N 0 ~y~1 ~(J O a~ 0 V V .,.., V Cn oA ~--i ~.+ i-i .~ w .~ ...~ u Cn ~--i '~ .~.. .--, .'~ .~..+ .~ V ~J .w+ ~1 v O .,.., W .~ ~.+ 0 V cn O ..,., cat b~A ~~ aA a.+ ..., 3 a~ u .,-, O V .F.i ~--~ t~ .~.- C~ O .,..i .,V.i V w w O .-~ ,.~ ~ ~ Aw .~ .~ V i-i Q-I ~--~ 0 .N 0 U .--~ cd a~ O ~~®~:~1 o ~ r U ~ N `"' C O ~ G f9 ~ 'C ~ ~ ~ `° O ~ d d _ ~ ?'i o v 'c ~m w N V ~ m ~ ~j ~1 v rn X17 rn ~n ~ ~ C ~ m c° ~ .1-.~ N j, ~ Q ~O ~ a~ w cs ~ U ~ O ~ L V Q d R N d ago ~ a N .'~.~ O `° `° ~ _ "' ~ o ;~ ~ v _ ~ t ~ ~ O ~ ~ y ^' ~ o ~ +~ o cn o ~ cct v~ Y ~- fA +~ _ o ~ a' ~ Z co Fu v a~+ 2 0- .s 'c o c ~ .I••+ R N ~ pp d ~C ~ W p' V °° C .C f9 O 1T~ +~ N f'O~i O U ~ ~ C \,~J V ~ ~ ~ Z ~ _ C ~ (u~ ~~I •1"I •~ [9 ~ 1 ~ O ~ F'1 O ~\ •~ ~ _y C ~ C p 1 ~ /V'/ ?O'i ~'~ ~ °~ ~ a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ '~~ d v LL o L a E ~ ~ u w ~ n .~ ~ ~ 0~ ^ .~ E Q a V O C a ~ ~ _C1 g ~ ° ,~ - CC$ ~ '` ~/l L ~ j. /'~ O T ~ ~ i~ m a~ ,., ~ i VA.J ~ O o ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ c ! .cam wit rV a m ~^ o ~~ ~ °o w W a o tt~~ ~ = ~ ~~~ ay ,~ N '+.5 ~ '} ~ ~. ~ C ~ J ~ v ~ w .•~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, -, +~ O u +~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . r-, O~DO~`~2 e-~ ~ N ~ .-. ° ° ~ ° ° o o ° w ~ n ~ ~ N M ~r-I Ln [~ ~ ~ lf) `.. O ~ ~ O N N ~ ~ w a~ 0 a j~ ~ ~ w ~ '~ ,~, ~ ~ ,o O ~ 'ci ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ '~ w ~ 0 0 ~ v ~ ~' ~ v ~ ~' o ~ °~ ~' V ~ *~ o ~`' ~+ o -'-' ~~ V •,~ ~ w H ~ ~ w ~ O ~ H w a~0~-~3 t--I N N _ O O ~ N O O O ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ M `.. ~ M ~} ~} O r-1 M N ~ ~ w a~ ~ '~ ° o ~n ~ ~ ~ ~ w v o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .o ~ ~ o w ~' ~ _ RS V ~ ~ ~ ~ O N .,.y ~ ~ O O ~ cn .~ ~ bA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z °~ ~ N °' ~' o •~ ~ o ~ V ~ ., .~ ~r-1 v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~_ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ w ~ ~ H w (~~®~-~~ O .,.., '~ H w ~ N ~ ~ ~ N O O O O {~ t-I t--I 00 O O l~ t-I [~ N M ~ ~1 .-. ~.+ V U ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ N ••i ~ v V .~ z ~ ~ o ~ ~, v . ~ v ~ v ~ o ~ ~ ~o •~ ~ o Q ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'u V ~ ~ •~•+ ~ ~ V Cn 0 ~ ,~ ~ O ~ ~ ,L~ ~ o~ ~ cn ~ O , O ~I ,~.~ ~--+ ~ v f h ~ V 0 , a--~ ~--~ '~ • •-i ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ . F N ~ V . ~ ; _ ~ c V w ~ c V .~ w ~..~ ~ • ~ ~ • c~ • Q'~OQ?5 O .,-+ ~~ N H '~ w ~., O oo ~ ~ N O e--I OQ lfj e--i 00 l.[) O e-I t -I M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .-. V ICI N .~ .,..~ V .,.., v o v ~ ... ~"' ~*-' O ~ m O ~+ V ~ V ~ ~ z ~ .,.., -~ o ~ o 0 V ,~ ~ ~ •r, cn u~ ~ w V ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~, ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ •~ `~ •~ o z . ©~oc~~s v V .,~ bA 0 O • r, -~.+ .,..~ 0 ~' 0 u .~ c~ w 0 0 N d+ I.t) bR V .~ v V u .,.~ V ~ ~ O N O ~ `O V ~ ~ 0 o c~ ~ a~ O U ~ '-~ ° ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ Q"' O ~ ~-+ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o °' a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ Q ~ o ~ U ~ w c~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v O ~ ~ w ~ H N w 0 0 0 O O P-I ~} c~ 0 R-I •,~ ~--~ GJ ~~.+ ~° 0 .r., V ~--~ V H u 0 O cn O .,.~ .a.+ e~ '~ v O V ~ ~ / I~~1 a~ a~ .,.., O V ~ ~ ~ bA .,.~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ v , V ~ ~y ~I ~ ~ N •~ O cis O v U v . ,..~ v v O U v .~ . r., '--~ V cCS w 0 0 u cl) c~ b4 .,.~ v v Cn .,.., ,--~ w 0 u 0 O Q u l1~ N f~} v a~ w .r., V N . ,..{ ~--i w ®~~~-~'~ ~"~ '~ w 3 0 a~ a~ .~ v x w a~ a~ 0 0 0 N w t~~(~~?~ ~• ~ p.~ ~~ ^~ W _,~ _~ _~ Meeting Date: March Subject: 2010 Streetlight Installation Cost Approval County Administrator's Comments: Page 1 of 2 Item Number: 8.A. '1 County Administrator: Board Action Requested: This item requests Board approval of a streetlight installation in the Dale District. Summary of Information: Requests for streetlights, from individual citizens or civic groups, are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: 1. Streetlights should be located at intersections; CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ooook31 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) 2. There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; 3. Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. Cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requester of the denial. Projects cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial. DALE DISTRICT: • Intersection of Greenyard Road and Iron Bridge Road Cost to install streetlight: $1,133.76 (Design Cost: $700.00) Meets minimum criteria For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report. STREETLIGHT REQUEST Dale District Request Received: May 21, 2009 Estimate Requested: May 21, 2009 Estimate Received: March 10, 2010 Days Estimate Outstanding: 293 NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mr. William Poole, representing ADDRESS: Trinity United Methodist Church P O Box 262 Chesterfield, VA 23832 REQUESTED LOCATIONS: Intersection of Greenyard Road and Iron Bridge Road Cost to install light: $1,133.76 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Qualified Vehicles Per Day: Qualified Petition: Qualified Requestor Comments: "The Administrative Board of Trinity United Methodist Church is requesting that a streetlight be installed at the intersection of Ironbridge and Greenyard Roads. Our church fronts on Ironbridge Road but is accessed from Greenyard Road; our address is 6600 Greenyard Road. We have had visitors have trouble finding Greenyard Road after dark and believe that the installation of a streetlight would help in that regard." OJOU~33 Streetlight Request Map March 24, 2010 This map is a copyrighted product of the Chesterfield County GIS Office. Streetlight Legend existing light • requested I ig ht N This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. 740 370 0 740 Feet cjs ®~D003~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 -- AGENDA ire Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.1.a. Subject: Resolution Recognizing April 11-17, 2010, as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week" in Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognize the week of April 11-17, 2010, as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week" in Chesterfield County, in honor of the men and women whose diligence and professionalism keep our county and citizens safe. Preparers Richard F. Troshak Title: Director, Emergency Communications Center Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #00035 RECOGNIZING APRIL 11 - 17, 2010, AS "NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATIONS WEEK" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, emergency communications officers daily serve the public in countless ways without regard for recognition received for services rendered; and WHEREAS, emergency communications officers are more than a calm and reassuring voice, but are knowledgeable and highly trained individuals who work closely with other police, fire, medical, animal control and sheriff personnel in the management of vital government communications and other services that affect the health and safety of our citizens; and WHEREAS, the work of these "first responders" is invaluable in emergency situations, and our citizens' health, safety, and well-being are often dependent on the commitment and devotion of emergency communications officers; and WHEREAS, emergency communications officers of the Chesterfield Emergency Communications Center work to improve the emergency response capabilities through their leadership and participation in training and other activities; and WHEREAS, each emergency communications officer has exhibited compassion, understanding and professionalism during the performance of their job in the past year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the week of April 11-17, 2010, as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week" in Chesterfield County, in honor of the men and women whose diligence and professionalism keep our county and citizens safe. Q~®Q:~~ \~ ~, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.1.b. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Deputy First Class Bobby L. Casto, Sheriff's Office, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Deputy First Class Bobby L. Casto will retire on April 1, 2010 after 17 years of service to the Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office. Preparers Dennis S. Proffitt Attachments: ^ yes ~ No #oaoc-;~~ Title: Sheriff RECOGNIZING DEPUTY FIRST CLASS BOBBY L. CASTO UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Bobby L. Casto began his service to the citizens of Chesterfield County as a part-time deputy in the Correctional Services Section of the Sheriff's Office under Sheriff Clarence G. Williams, Jr. in July of 1991; and WHEREAS, in June of 1993, Deputy Casto became full time, was transferred to Court Security in June of 1994, and served in that position with distinction until his retirement April 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, in September 2005, Deputy Casto was recognized for his suggestion to improve the distribution of daily holding lists, which saved the department about $6500 a year; and WHEREAS, in May 2006, Deputy Casto was recognized for suggesting that the Sheriff's Office switch from hard copy departmental policy to a CD format, which resulted in an annual savings for the department of over $10,000 a year; and WHEREAS, in November 2008, Deputy Casto met the requirements to achieve the status of Deputy First Class while still assigned to the Court Services Section; and WHEREAS, Deputy First Class Casto has served with honor and distinction in the Court Services Section of the Sheriff's Office since 1994, receiving many letters of appreciation and commendation; and WHEREAS, Deputy First Class Casto's desire to do a good job has been consistently evident in the performance of his duties and in his service to the citizens of Chesterfield County for 17 years of full time service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mr. Bobby L. Casto, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service to the county and congratulations upon his retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy retirement. 00003 ..~~ ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.6.1.c. Subject: Resolution Recognizing Deputy First Class Walter R. Ogburn, Sheriff's Office, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Deputy First Class Walter R. Ogburn will retire on May 1, 2010 after 20 years of service to the Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office. Preparers Dennis S. Proffitt Title: Sheriff Attachments: ^ yes ~ No # 0~®0.3~ RECOGNIZING DEPUTY FIRST CLASS WALTER R. OGBURN UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. Walter R. Ogburn began his service to the citizens of Chesterfield County as a deputy in the Courts Services Section of the Sheriff's Office under Sheriff Walter J. Minton in April of 1990; and WHEREAS, in June 1997 and March 2008, Deputy Ogburn was chosen as Employee of the Quarter, and in December 2001, he was chosen as an Honorable Mention Employee of the Quarter; and WHEREAS, in November 2008, Deputy Ogburn met the requirements to achieve the status of Deputy First Class while still assigned to the Court Services Section; and WHEREAS, Deputy First Class Ogburn has served with honor and distinction in the Court Services Section of the Sheriff's Office since 1990, receiving many letters of appreciation and commendation; and WHEREAS, Deputy First Class Ogburn's desire to do a good job has been consistently evident in the performance of his duties during his 20 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mr. Walter R. Ogburn, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for his dedicated service to the county and congratulations upon his retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy retirement. (~'~®~~~ ,i CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.1.d. Subject: Resolution Supporting the Installation of Signs Advising of an Additional Maximum $200 Fine for Exceeding the Posted Speed Limit in the Salem Woods Subdivision on Old Warson Drive and Post Horn Drive County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action ReQUested: Staff recommends the Board adopt the attached resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to install signs advising of an additional maximum $200 fine for exceeding the posted speed limit in the Salem woods Subdivision on Old Warson Drive and Post Horn Drive. Summary of Information: Mr. Holland received a request from support the installation of VDOT $200 fine for exceeding the posted Horn Drive. (Continued next page) Preparers R.J.McCracken Agen732 the Salem Woods Homeowners Association to signs advising of an additional maximum speed limit on Old Warson Drive and Post Title: Director of Transportation Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ~~0$~4~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary (Continued): Section 46.2-878.2 of the Code of Virginia was revised in 1999 to provide for additional fines up to a maximum of $200 for exceeding the speed limit in a residence district where indicated by appropriately placed signs. On June 17, 1999, the Commonwealth Transportation Board adopted "Policy and Procedures" for processing requests for the increased maximum fine. The "Policy and Procedures" require the county to provide a resolution to the local VDOT Resident Engineer requesting installation of the signs, identifying the neighborhood and the specific roadway(s) where the signs are to be installed, confirming that the roadway(s) meet the criteria for posting, notifying VDOT that a speeding problem exists, and indicating that the increased maximum fine has community support. Old Warson Drive and Post Horn Drive in Salem Woods subdivision meet VDOT's criteria for installation of the signs indicating the increased maximum fine. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board adopt the attached resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to install signs advising of an additional maximum $200 fine for exceeding the posted speed limit in the Salem Woods Subdivision on Old Warson Drive and Post Horn Drive. DIStrICt: Dale WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors has received a request from the Salem Woods Homeowners Association to install signs on Old Warson Drive (Route 1905) and Post Horn Drive (Route 1997) indicating a maximum additional fine for speeding of $200, in addition to other penalties provided by law; and WHEREAS, Old Warson Drive and Post Horn Drive are local residential streets with a posted speed limit of 25 mph; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation collected speed data in Salem Woods indicating that the 85th percentile speed of vehicles was over 30 miles per hour, and that a speeding problem exists; and WHEREAS, the Salem Woods Homeowners Association voted in favor of the increased fine . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to install signs advising of an additional maximum $200 fine for exceeding the posted speed limit on Old Warson Drive and Post Horn Drive. ~~~~~~ SALEM WOODS ADDITIONAL FINE FOR SPEEDING ' ti;u~~ ~~ ~~~ ~/ ` ~ ~V `,'T r `ice 1LJ._I t `-j ,' ` ~~/ ~ r- i-- _ ~ ~~ ~' I t i h~ y I ~ r f I` r ;~ J ~~,h f~ J~ ~~.,,~ ~ r ~` ~-~ .. ;y C A~-'"~~-~ ~ - - ~ _ ' _~ ~ r `~ r r' i. ._. ._.,. _ ~ Jam' j, L ~ ___ ~T-rl' ~ 7} ~ ~ T _r i-- r `_ _.. /, w -. ~ , ~}- , i-, _ s . , ~ ~ ~"'~ ~____} ~ ~ ~~ r ~ 1 I r ,j , ~4: y J~ _, ~_ ~ 1. ~~y~ ~I ,~. ~ .,~,~- f _ ~,~, _ ~ ~ ~, ., ~~ ~' ---~-- ~ ~~ _~ ~ --_ _~ x ~-t~ ~- ~, _.~ ~ N V' ~ F__. 7; ~~ ' ~ ~. ~ ; rte} ~ _~~ ~ 1- NAL ~~' 1 ' ._--, ~- -~-- - ~ FINES ~ _ ~ ' ~~ ~ ~-~-= ~ r ~.-, ~ v -' ~-,-F T--~ "-- ~ - rv ti..- -~~J ~~r ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ 4 -~ rA' ~~ ' v Get ~~-I I ~ ~ .r-1~ ~ ~ ,,y ~- ~d ,hl,~ ` ~^%_ r \ . ` ~\.~ ` ~ ~/ I x.'1_1 ~ ~ t 'r -~-{~~.Y ~L -1 ~ ~ ~ ~.,_. ; ,~ ~ t,• ~ - ~ ~.A ~-11' t--~ ~-~` / ~' "~` \ ~ tom,,:, F-~ ~_t `~''~ L K . ; `~ \ -:- f ~ ~ , ~,- _l, ,'~ ~, ~ ~ - -- y ~F T ._.......__.,...__._.....V.,_____• ~,o 3/2/10 ~a~i o~~4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.6.2. Subject: Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding Microwave Interoperability System (RAMIS) Chesterfield, Goochland, Hanover, Henrico, County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: for Phase I of the Richmond Area Between and Among the Counties of Powhatan and the City of Richmond Authorize the County Administrator to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding agreement relating to Phase I of the Richmond Area Microwave Interoperability System (RAMIS) between and among the counties of Chesterfield, Goochland, Hanover, Henrico, Powhatan and the city of Richmond, Virginia. Summary of Information: Henrico County ("Henrico"), on behalf of and in conjunction with the participating localities, was awarded a grant from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management for funding for the design, development and installation of equipment, devices, hardware and software in each locality's Emergency Operations Center and Emergency Communications Center that will support various applications, including data collaboration, video conferencing, Internet voice communications, and aviation video with our regional partners. Preparers Richard Troshak Title: Director of Emergency Communications Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No 00005 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 One of the primary benefits of RAMIS to Chesterfield County is providing additional redundancy to our 800 MHz public safety radio system. Another benefit of this system is it will provide direct voice communications between emergency communications centers in our region that is not dependant on commercial telephone service providers. The system will consist of microwave antennas, transmitters, facilities and devices sited in various locations throughout the Richmond Area, a main server to be located in Henrico County's Emergency Operations Center, and an aviation video receiver system in Chesterfield County. In order to ensure that the equipment is maintained and serviced and that the costs of such service and maintenance are fairly and equitably allocated among the Participating Phase I Localities, the attached Memorandum of Understanding has been prepared for signature by each participating locality. The commitment is contingent upon funding appropriations by the governing body of each jurisdiction. OJ®~46 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA 1799 Budget and Management Comments• This item requests that the Board authorize the County Administrator to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreement relating to Phase I of the Richmond Area Microwave Interoperability System (RAMIS) between and among the counties of Chesterfield, Goochland, Hanover, Henrico, Powhatan and the city of Richmond, Virginia. The MOU ensures that participating localities will share in the necessary maintenance and service costs of this equipment. The annual maintenance and service cost for the county is anticipated to be $50, 000 - $55, 000 beginning in FY2013. Staff will make recommendations for funding these costs during the FY2013 budget process. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management (?~®04'7 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING RELATING TO PHASE I OF THE RICHMOND AREA MICROWAVE INTEROPERABILITY SYSTEM BETWEEN AND AMONG THE COUNTIES OF CHESTERFIELD, GOOCHLAND, HANOVER, HENRICO, POWHATAN AND THE CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA This Memorandum of Understanding is made this day of , 2009, between and among the counties of Chesterfield, Goochland, Hanover, Henrico and Powhatan, Virginia and the City of Richmond, Virginia (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the "Participating Phase I Localities") in order to ensure that the equipment, facilities, devices, software, hardware and other systems comprising Phase I of the Richmond Area Microwave Interoperability System are properly maintained and serviced and that the costs of such service and maintenance are fairly and equitably allocated among the Participating Phase I Localities. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grant Program, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration ("NTIA") made $1 billion in federal grants available for the creation or improvement of interoperable regional emergency communications systems; and, WHEREAS, the Participating Phase I Localities as well as Charles City and New Kent counties (hereinafter, "Participating Phase II Localities"), decided to improve the regional emergency communications system by creating a microwave interoperability system to serve the area comprising these eight jurisdictions (hereinafter, geographically, the "Richmond Area"); and, WHEREAS, Phase I of the Richmond Area Microwave Interoperability System ("RAMIS" or the "System") will permit high-speed microwave transmission of data between and among the Participating Phase I Localities' Emergency Operations or Communications Centers ("EOCs" and/or "ECCs") and the Commonwealth of Virginia's state EOC operated by the Virginia Department of Emergency Management ("VDEM"); and, WHEREAS, the System will consist of microwave antennas, transmitters and other equipment, facilities and devices sited in various locations throughout the Richmond Area; a main server to be located in Henrico County's Emergency Operations Center on Parham Road; an aviation video receiver system in Chesterfield County; various equipment, devices and software in each locality's EOCs or ECCs; and the hardware and software necessary to support various applications, including data collaboration, video conferencing, Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) and aviation video. WHEREAS, Henrico County ("Henrico"), on behalf of and in conjunction with, the Participating Phase I and Phase II Localities, submitted a grant proposal to VDEM for funding ~~'®~~8 for the design, development and installation of the System, as well as for training and maintenance during the grant performance period associated with the System; and, WHEREAS, VDEM awarded Henrico, as grant recipient for the Participating Localities, a grant of $3,000,000 to undertake the activities described in its grant proposal; and, WHEREAS, on March 3, 2009, on behalf of the Participating Phase I and Phase II Localities, Henrico issued Request for Proposals #09-8604-2CS, seeking bids for "A Proposal to provide the Richmond Area Microwave Interoperability System"; and, WHEREAS, after receiving four responses to its RFP, Henrico, with the agreement of the Participating Phase I and Phase II Localities and with the permission of VDEM, decided to split the Microwave Interoperability System Project into two phases, with Phase II dependent on obtaining a second grant; and, WHEREAS, the Participating Phase I Localities and VDEM will obtain use of the System after Phase I is completed; and, WHEREAS, the Participating Phase II Localities, along with Henrico's Jail-East, will obtain use of the System after Phase II is completed; and, WHEREAS, Henrico informed the bidders of its decision to bifurcate the project and obtained modified proposals in response; and, WHEREAS, based on the modified bids and best and final offers, Henrico determined that Alcatel-Lucent ("Alcatel") was the winning bidder; and, WHEREAS, because the System will be integrated in a manner that requires all components of the System to be fully-functioning; and, WHEREAS, failure of equipment or facilities located in one Participating Locality would likely result in loss of System service to some or all of the other Participating Localities; and, WHEREAS, proper maintenance and service is necessary for proper System functioning and utility; and, WHEREAS, Alcatel's winning bid includes commitments for maintaining the software, hardware, equipment, devices and facilities that comprise the System; and, WHEREAS, Alcatel has apportioned the maintenance costs fora 10-year period by service level, equipment, site and locality, as described in Alcatel's maintenance pricing matrix, hereinafter Exhibit A to this MOU; and, WHEREAS, while the agreement documents establish guaranteed costs for maintenance plans, the maintenance costs themselves are not included in the price for purchasing the System, ~~~~~~ 2 nor does the Alcatel agreement guarantee any maintenance costs after the coverage period has expired; and, WHEREAS, absent an understanding and agreement among the Participating Phase I Localities, Henrico could be obligated to bear the cost of maintenance and upkeep of the system under the agreement with Alcatel because these costs are not covered by the NTIA grant and because Henrico is the locality undertaking procurement of the system; and, WHEREAS, no Participating Phase I Locality should be required to bear more than its pro-rata share of the cost of System maintenance and upkeep, based on its population benefitting from the System. NOW, THEREFORE, in order to provide for awell-maintained and serviced System benefitting the Participating Phase I Localities, the Participating Phase I Localities hereby agree in principle to the following: 1. Definitions. a. "Agreement Documents" shall refer to the agreement documents specified and referenced in ¶ 2 of Contract #8604 between the Henrico and Alcatel-Lucent, to be signed by Henrico upon ratification of this MOU by all Participating Phase I Localities. b. "Facility" shall refer to each location of equipment and devices as listed and described in the first column of Alcatel's maintenance pricing matrix, Exhibit A. c. "Equipment" shall refer to each device, machine or other equipment identified in Exhibit A as being located or sited at a Facility. d. "Stranded Facility" or "Stranded Equipment" shall refer to any Facility or Equipment whose purpose is to relay microwave signals to a Participating Locality other than the Locality where the Facility is located. Stranded Facilities are listed in Exhibit A. e. "Common Facilities" or "Common Equipment" shall refer to Equipment or Facilities, including but not limited to, servers, electronic components, radio or microwave transmission equipment, hardware and software, that serves all localities roughly in equal proportion and degree, regardless of whether such Facilities or Equipment are physically located in any one locality, in several localities, or in all localities. The System's servers are an example of Common Facilities. The Common Facilities and Common Equipment are listed in Exhibit A. f. "Years 2 through 10" shall refer to the 9 year period of time commencing the year after the year that begins with system acceptance and shall be the same as those years for which there are "Years" columns in Alcatel's Best and Final Offer. g. "Maintenance" shall refer to all repairs, upkeep, replacement, service, debugging, reprogramming, and/or any other actions or tasks required (1) to ~'~®~~~ prevent System failure or inadequate performance, (2) to keep the System operable and fully functional within the specifications detailed in the Agreement Documents or (3) to ensure that all warranties and/or maintenance agreements remain fully valid and enforceable. Maintenance shall refer to any such repair, service, replacement or other work, action or task regardless of whether such will be covered or paid for by any maintenance agreement or warranty. h. "Maintenance Costs" shall refer to all costs associated with Maintenance, including (1) the payments to purchase the Gold or Silver level of service from Alcatel at the price referenced in Exhibit A, (2) lease costs, if any, for television or radio tower space and/or (3) costs to repair or replace equipment. i. "Covered Maintenance" shall mean maintenance provided pursuant to a maintenance agreement or warranty contained in the Agreement Documents. Maintenance provided by Alcatel pursuant to the Gold or Silver level of service shall constitute Covered Maintenance. j. "Covered Maintenance Costs" shall refer to the costs required to purchase the Gold or Silver level of service, as described in Exhibit A. k. "Non-covered Maintenance" shall mean maintenance not provided pursuant to a maintenance agreement or warranty contained in the Agreement Documents, or to the extent any maintenance agreement or warranty provides only partial coverage, that portion which is not paid for under the maintenance agreement or warranty. 1. "Non-covered Maintenance Costs" shall refer to the costs of any Non-covered Maintenance. m. "Individual Jurisdictional Maintenance Costs" shall refer to all Covered and Non-covered Maintenance Costs associated with any and all Facilities and Equipment in a Participating Locality's jurisdiction, less any maintenance costs associated with Stranded and Common Facilities and Equipment. n. "Common Maintenance Costs" shall refer to the sum total of all Covered and Non-covered Maintenance Costs for all Common Facilities and Equipment and Stranded Facilities and Equipment. Common Maintenance Costs shall include the Gold or Silver level of maintenance service associated with the Stranded or Common Facility or Equipment plus all Non-covered Maintenance Costs. Common Maintenance Costs shall also include the cost of administering the System, including the administration of the budget and invoicing for financing Common Maintenance Costs as well the technical administration of the System. o. "Share of Common Maintenance Costs" shall refer to a Participating Phase I Locality's share of the Common Maintenance Costs, to be calculated by determining, for each Participating Phase I Locality, the locality's contribution to the total population of all Participating Phase I Localities, expressed as a percentage of the total population, then multiplying the Common Maintenance Costs by that locality's population percentage. For example, a locality whose population constitutes 30% of the total population of all Participating Phase I Localities shall have a Share of Common Maintenance Cost equal to 30% of the total Common Maintenance Costs. ~~®~~~ 4 The most recent, publicly available U.S. Census data shall be used for purposes of determining each Participating Locality's population and total population. A Participating Phase I Locality's Share of Common Maintenance Costs shall be zero dollars ($0) until such time it has accrued any Individual Jurisdictional Maintenance Costs. 2. Each Participating Phase I Locality agrees to provide an adequate and acceptable location for the installation of the RAMIS equipment, consistent with the Agreement Documents. 3. Each Participating Phase I Locality Agrees to cooperate with Alcatel in the installation of the RAMIS equipment and to reasonably permit Alcatel to undertake the installation and other activities required of it under the Agreement Documents. 4. Each Participating Phase I Locality agrees to operate the System in accordance with the following principles: a. No Participating Phase I Locality shall modify the System's configuration or add applications without the consent of the other Participating Phase I Localities; b. No Participating Phase I Locality shall modify the System in any manner that unreasonably threatens the integrity and functionality of the System; and c. Each Participating Phase I Locality shall operate the System in accordance with the System documentation and training in order to enhance the level of public safety in the Richmond Area and optimize interoperable communications and data sharing among the Participating Phase I Localities. 5. Upon completion of Phase I of the System's installation, and after acceptance by Henrico pursuant to the Agreement Documents, Henrico shall transfer ownership of all Facilities and Equipment to the jurisdiction wherein the Facility and/or Equipment is located. Each Participating Phase I Locality agrees to accept ownership of the Facilities and Equipment located in its jurisdiction. 6. Each Participating Phase I Locality shall ensure that all Facilities and Equipment located within its jurisdiction are properly and adequately maintained and serviced in order to (1) prevent System failure or inadequate performance, (2) keep the System operable and fully functional within the specifications detailed in the Agreement Documents and (3) ensure that any and all warranties and/or maintenance agreements remain fully valid and enforceable. 7. In order to ensure that the System's Facilities and Equipment are adequately and properly maintained and serviced, as required by Paragraph 2 above, each Participating Phase I Locality agrees to undertake the following: a. Pay its Individual Jurisdictional Maintenance Costs, including (i) for Years 2 through 10 for each Facility or item of Equipment located in its jurisdiction that is not a Stranded or Common Facility or Equipment, purchasing either the Gold or Silver level of maintenance service from Alcatel or maintaining the (~~®~'~~ 5 Facility or Equipment to the same level as Alcatel's maintenance service using in-house personnel or competent contracted services, and (ii) for non- Common and non-Stranded Facilities and Equipment, undertaking, at its own expense, any needed maintenance or service not covered by a manufacturer warranty or the Gold or Silver Alcatel maintenance plan; b. Pay its Share of Common Maintenance Costs, as determined by Henrico. Common Maintenance Costs are shown in Exhibit C; and c. Ensure that any entity performing System maintenance or service has access to all System Facilities or Equipment located within its jurisdiction, provided that the entity is either a Participating Locality, Alcatel-Lucent or an Equipment manufacturer or supplier, or an agent, contractor or subcontractor for a Participating Locality, Alcatel-Lucent or an Equipment manufacturer or supplier. Any questions about whether an entity is properly qualified and permitted to perform maintenance and service under the Contract Documents should be directed to Henrico. d. Maintenance and service shall not be required by this MOU for non-Stranded or non-Common Equipment, provided such Equipment is not critical to System functionality. Examples ofnon-critical Equipment for which Maintenance and Service are not required by this MOU include computer monitors, phone sets and other Equipment for which replacement may be more economical then repair early in the Equipment's life cycle. 8. As the grant recipient and procuring jurisdiction, Henrico agrees to annually determine and calculate the Common Maintenance Costs, including administration costs, and each Participating Phase I Locality's Share thereof. 9. Henrico agrees to produce, at the request of any Participating Phase I Locality, a copy of all records, invoices, receipts, calculations and any other records, documents and information used to determine Common Maintenance Costs and each locality's Share thereof. 10. The Participating Phase I Localities understand and recognize that each Locality cannot expend funds unless appropriated by its governing body and may not obligate a future session of such governing body. Therefore, notwithstanding any provision in this MOU to the contrary, if a Participating Phase I Locality's governing body fails to appropriate funds for the maintenance, administration and service of the System, all its obligations hereunder shall automatically terminate upon depletion of the then currently appropriated or allocated funds. As soon as any such funds are depleted, such Locality shall no longer be considered a Participating Phase I Locality, and shall no longer be entitled to the benefit of Common or Stranded Facilities or Facilities or Equipment in any other Participating Phase I Locality's jurisdiction. Furthermore, the remaining Participating Phase I Localities shall be under no obligation whatsoever to expend any funds to maintain or service Facilities and Equipment of Localities that are no longer Participating Phase I Localities. Q~®~1~3 6 Chesterfield County By: Title: Hanover County By: Title: Powhatan County By: Title: Goochland County By: Title: Henrico County By: Virgil R. Hazelett, P.E. Title: Count Mana er City of Richmond By: Title: Q~Q~~~ 7 »., CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.8.3. Subject: State Road Acceptance County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of resolution for referenced state road acceptance. Summary of Information: Bermuda: Rossington Section 1 Rossington Section 2 Westchester Townhouses Section 1 Clover Hill: Colony Pointe Section 1 Temie Lee Parkway Preparers Richard M McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # C~:D®~~~ TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT State Road Acceptance - ROSSINGTON SECTION 1 DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: March 24, 2010 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: ELLENBROOK DR ROSSINGTON BLVD ROSSINGTON PL STOCKLEIGH LN Vicinity Map: ROSSINGTON SECTION 1 CREEKWAY DAM)FLS S7 JPv ~ N S P P E CHIPSTEAD RD '(0006RI G GLOR~R 40 a a pN`yL50Fi oOF ~ ~ ` ~ ~ S~ CiCERO PKWY ~ A PL Ci CT C ~ N ~ ~ ~~~`'~ ^~ ~ ` to CT ~` ~ T O Z 4 1n p P~ ~ m r7- Y ,~k, Q m S CT A ~ ° PL ~ O , 9 7 0 ENE OT O CHIPS PL z ~ ~ n o QO E~0 0~ 0~ G~ O~ tir 000 4 ~ ~ ~~ O~ ~~ ~~ PJ TSHIRE M1LL~0 6~ STHILLRO 6~ ~~ G ~ `G~ O ~ti ~ x ~~~ ~ O O n F G '~f O o CT y O ~ F F O - i ~ e~ ~LSMITH Rb y \~G G~q o o P y °r ~ ~~R Oy GE r c ~ ? r s ~ oT z ~F T R o~ vR«Y DO ;m 3 O <N S~ m~ ~ OOR C 4 0 ~ B( JA A IV yQ gV~kT O~ y c~ AZ ~ o D CARO ~' A LEYRD p 740 z ~ 2 A XLEY n J' ~ BLRY w OR A o ~ m y tiDflENVN- ~ OAKHa EpCT yN ~ BALOW 2 9gL0h'/NRO O ~ ~ ~¢ ~o ~ LlS'S~BU ~-J // -V I~ ~uXTONDR q~ C~ o ~ VN9ti ~ ~ O O~ { ~DFOREST 9 ~~O RgMSEyQR ?'9PPL~~~~e9 ~ V'~ f R OAP LONG ZG 089LY CS GOO nT = G~ ,`~Sp KN ~ ~, y ~ J?y O,P q 5 ~ O ~ 'YO 9 y0~~ ,~. may? Q > 3\ G h 5 r~0 HAPPY HILL RD NO~\G ~P~G SDy2 ~O ~pS~G 11~ O~JO QP Jt PRA mm Q~ ~ ~'T G ~L 3~ ~0 ~ C ti -+ 9~ O 00 ~•~ <' .a `o ~ >u N 9~ O~Ot't ~~' ,9e CT ~ K C~ F O ENO Produced By Chesterfield County qS TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - ROSSINGTON SECTION 2 DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: March 24, 2010 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: ELLENBROOK DR ELLENBROOK PL ROSSINGTON BLVD WENSLEY LN Vicinity Map: ROSSINGTON SECTION 2 9,p~ Oip 4 U CRE~wAY r DANfE[S ST 0 2~ W ~LENErT ~~~sMITH RD o~ g - 1 r Q r A ~ C H cR ~~ m n O A s~ v° `9G yoL P~! O N AD ODO z y D CHIPSTEAD RD OeR R lq ( 'i O ~~ 0 -o PL c cr ~ r Q O N C'T 7 ~ cr ~ ; m o yy ~ 9 O Q O r N Q' ~ m ~~ ~ r S CT a j ~ ~ CHIP 9 p i A A ~ x O ~O O OO 9 -tltl{ MILV~D ~ ~STH![[RD R @~G~ 6~ '~f otir ono c< ~ ~ ACT 3 y~\ C x r Fsr. m r ~ OR cr'~( c LEY RD d H}00EN V ~' ' cr .,~ PO \ HAPPY HILL RD • a[ `a O A ~m /3 W ~MSfiYDR °r 0 e~ ~~ NO~~~pT o. OP a~ V~j a~ SAD y~gC¢ 9~ ~~ ~~~ O T~ CT C X EY ~_ BURY ~ DR z w 0¢ O U roro DR <~ GC C+'~ 2F C9~ O FT P6F -Or oq ~a 1 '0~3, ~ 00 FOREST < ~ L~ i ~ f G~ GRS KNOBBLY ~ JP~~ ~Oq l~ oa Q" r2 •,l i~ s0 ~J 2y ~ c ~'Y m o~` w ~ G~ ~ m c~ CT c7 '~+ ~ w Produced By Cheatefield County qS TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -WESTCHESTER TOWNHOUSES SECTION 1 DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: March 24, 2010 ROAD FOR CONSIDERATION: PERDUE SPRINGS DR Vicinity Map: WESTCHESTER TOWNHOUSES ~ Z BORN G m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cT ~ J~ O ~O z Q ~ ~ 1 ~ N U1 ~ ER 3 ~ 1. GOYN E TE R ,NC'S ~R ~ 2. GOYNE RD Q~ ~ 3. GOYN E LOOP Q J~ ~N ~ acv ~o o-o Produced By Chestefield County qS l.f~©~~~ TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -COLONY POINTE SECTION 1 DISTRICT: CLOVER HILL MEETING DATE: March 24, 2010 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: CLAY RIDGE DR PARRISH CREEK CT CLAY RIDGE TER PARRISH CREEK LN OLD GLORY RD PARRISH CREEK PL PARRISH CREEK CIR PARRISH CREEK TER Vicinity Map: COLONY POINTE SECTION 1 CT O ~~ ~ OHO o~Z O Q ~ ~ A PJ, C~ O ~ ~ O 2 ~ ~6 O 1 2 R s~ti ~ GEAR ~ ~` ~ p~.~~~ ~`~ m ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ n 7o RO ~ C ~ O ~ ~F~ CAROL ANNE ~ FR T ~9 ~ T `~ EEK ~ n m~ AO PARRISH CR z pQ ~ ~ Q`~ Z~ DR ~ v 'p0 BER~RAIL O'4 FAMILY LN Rps FF~ Q~, ~~ '°( ~\~GO R CT ~ Cp V~ `~G 'P '9G ~ ~ 5~` ~,~ ~o~igLF 2c<~ c'~ ~ c~. m`~ RTE 288 GS Rp 2 a Produced By Chesterfield County GIS t.i~ ~ ®~ /+.~ J TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -Temie Lee Pkwy DISTRICT: CLOVER HILL MEETING DATE: March 24, 2010 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: TEMIE LEE PKWY Vicinity Map: Temie Lee Pkwy Q ~~~ F~\ ~~ ~F l~ F SOUTHSH~R~ A~~ ~R~~~ POI NTE ~R ~~~s. N ~ ~o G~~ Produced By Chesterfield County qS IYIJ"®~V V CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.6.4.a. Subject: Change Order to Shoosmith Construction Incorporated for Site Improvements in Preparation for Installation of a Modular Classroom and Combination Carport/ Storage Shed for the Emergency Vehicle Operations Course (EVOC) at the Enon Public Safety Training Center ministrator's C County Administrator: Authorize the County Administrator to execute a change order with Shoosmith Construction Incorporated, in the amount of $72,722.00 for site improvements in preparation for the installation of a modular classroom and combination carport/storage shed at the EVOC at the Enon Public Safety Training Center. Summary of Information: As the planning for the Enon Public Safety Training Center developed over a period of years, it was envisioned that the support facilities, first as separate buildings for Police and Fire, and later as what has become the Combined Support Building (CSB) would be constructed either ahead of the EVOC or at the same time. The CSB space includes classrooms and vehicle maintenance areas to support the EVOC, along with other training spaces for the Police Department, the Sheriff's Office, and the Fire Department. As planning proceeded, the decision was made to fund and construct the EVOC first due to the urgent need to train officers in pursuit driving techniques. The need for a classroom, and vehicle and maintenance storage space to support the EVOC, combined with the delayed funding of the CSB, led to the decision to provide a small combination carport and storage area and a modular classroom. Those items have been ordered separately. This change order will allow the general contractor to prepare the site for installation of the carport/storage area and the modular classroom. Site preparation includes clearing, grading, electrical connections, and paving for parking. Preparer:_ Robert C. Key Title: Director of General Services Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # ©~D®0~1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Budget and Management Comments: Page 2 of 2 This item requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a change order with Shoosmith Construction, Inc. in the amount of $72,722 for work detailed in the item. Sufficient funding is available in the project to cover the cost of the change order. The classroom and storage area, exclusive of the site work is expected to cost $75,000. Funding to construct the combined support building (CSB) is currently in the county's proposed FY2011 - FY2015 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in FY2013. After the CSB is constructed, both the classroom and storage area will continue to be used as integral parts of the support needed to provide training at the EVOC. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director. Budget and Management ~~0~~2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.4.b. Subject: Change Order in the Amount of $33,095.24 and Additional Approval Authority to the County Administ~`ator for Future Change Orders on the Circuit Court Addition and Renovations Protect County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: i Board Action Requested: Authorize the County Administrator to execute a change order in the amount of $33,095.24 and grant approval authority to the County Administrator for future change orders for the Circuit Court Addition and Renovations project in the amount of $250,000. Summary of Information: For contracts over $500,000, the change order policy of Chesterfield County requires the Board of Supervisors to approve all change orders to a contract once the total amount of the change orders reaches 10 percent of the original contract amount as well as when a single change order exceeds $50,000. The Board's approval in February of the $196,936.84 change order for assignment of the separately bid security contract to the general contractor brought the total approved change orders to $455,216.88 or $67,518 over the 10 percent threshold. Staff requests that the Board approve a change order in the amount of $33,095.24 (see attachment) and grant authority to the County Administrator to execute future change orders up to an additional $250,000. Individual change orders exceeding $50,000 will still be brought before the Board for approval. While the first phase of the project is nearing completion, there are three additional construction phases remaining, and Preparers Robert C. Key Title: Director of General Services Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # (~~®~~3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA approximately 18 months until contr all renovations, including removal so it is anticipated that additiona the likely discovery of unforeseen expeditiously process small change project . act completion. The remaining phases are of existing walls and work above ceilings, 1 change orders will be forthcoming due to conditions. Approval will allow staff to orders and proceed with completing the ()~®~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 - AGENDA 17{9 Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board of Supervisors approve change order #13 in the amount of $33,095.24 for the Circuit Court Addition and Renovation Project. Additionally staff is requesting to grant the County Administrator an exception to the change order policy to allow him to approve change orders for up to an additional $250,000. There are three phases remaining that will span an 18 month period which involves renovation of existing space. There is a sufficient balance in the contingency to cover the requested authority that is being requested at this time. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachment for Circuit Courts agenda item March 24, 2010 -Change Order #13 PCO # Description PCO Amount PCO# 35 Repair damaged sidewalk 8~ install curb cut - $5,638.90 During relocation of the Va Power underground lines, part of the existing sidewalk was damaged and had to be replaced. The curb cut was also installed at the loading dock for delivery trucks. PCO# 65 Install Emergency circuit - A circuit had to be $19,143.26 added to the emergency panel to provide back-up power for the security system, fire alarm and data equipment. PCO# 69 Additional pre-action smoke detectors and pull $7,933.84 stations for phase I -Additional pre-action fire alarm system detectors and pull stations were installed per Fire Marshal's request. PCO# 70 Repaint two existing lockers -Two existing $379.24 evidence room lockers had to be repainted to match four new lockers added during renovation. Total $33,095.24 ~~0~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~, AGENDA Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.5.a. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along Beulah Road from the Most Reverend Francis Xavier DiLorenzo, Successor to John J. Russell at Saint Augustine Catholic Church County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.463 acres along Beulah Road from the Most Reverend Francis Xavier DiLorenzo, successor to John J. Russell and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # 030!1sci7 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along Betdah Road from the NTost Reverend Francis Xavier DiLorenzo Successor to Jolui J. Russell at Saint Augustine Catholic Cltw•clt M Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W - -E S I hcl -666.6' !e t ~~®C'~J~ ~, I~FJ 1 101liLSlO 3~V0 p A"~ ~~ ~~gg ~ 03SN30113BO18tl3tltlONViN3W3Stl3 ~ ~ ~ T'" N~ a.~~ ~~7k n~aw 3NI'Itl31VMA03SOdOtldtl'Ol3L-Itl31S3H0 ~ ~ ~ ~ LL v ~" € ~ 3 d0 AJ.Nf100 3N1 Ol O31r91O3O 3B Ol ~ B 8 n ~ Q ~ ro w E ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ g ~ ~ avotl NYif139 do 9N1'1 NitloN 3N1 NO ONtl~ ~ ~ ~ y G r- o D ~~ 5~;~~ k~~? s~~s_~~? i03tl01/CYY'OONIMONS1tlld0311dW00 o ~ a ~ ~ ~o ~ o~t ~ + ~ yg~ ~ h ` ~ m M1l"N m ~ h~~~ fie' ~~`a'~ &i3~4:, :~ '^..o~ ~ ~ IOtoo °w ~~~~_ ;g~~ ~~~7~h~~ ~ ~~ ~3 erg',. ~ \ \ Za \ g> ~m '~~~ @~ \ ~ ~' O Ojy'~M~/d ~`cYc`2~r3~°ic'~>SYi ~I Q s \\ \\ W "G' ~~µ 8 \ \ ^ O SN,i•,~ld''r \ ~ m ~~',~\ a ~ \ \ .3~ ~~s ` ~ \ 0 3. ,c r~N^ E/ 1 ~ 1 W ~luu n ~ N O.N. f Vf N °o, /!' ~ -\ 1 o C ~°./ , ~ \ \ imooooooo~, ~ b^ v \ \ -mss ~' \ i ~ ~ 'D "Cr~\ t \ $ O /-~~~ ~ ~ `\ \ ~~ i i' \ ".~ ~ _ b O ~ l ~ a~ h~ ~ ~ o? \ ~ ~ `~ p~h oRo ~~~~p~cc ~ / / ~ ~c~N~ ~=byi ~ // // ^ -~ 'fig ~\ i Y~ ~ t g\ m ~~no~ y / ~ h ~ ~~ oih ~~ 2 / / ~.. : b \ ~~ I I e q ~°\' o o ~° I OL ~ a I I I C ~ ~ ^ $' ~ (°Fr,B hoc °~°3 aoaor ~ar,oraas /~ /) ~ ~ $ W Wg\l ~\~.\~~<~o z~R / // ^Wb Cr \ ~~~ iW r__- --1_1_-___~ ~ ~ E \\\ N .1 ~o4a \ I I E ~~ \\\ r 3WN \ a I I 4i ~ ~. ~\ Q ~~ \ w I /' a ~° I ~~a \\ w 2 \\ \ N ~^ I ~~ I `p a 1\ ~ b^ h ^ 1q ! 2 I h I F~ \J~ iu I I ~~ r- ~ ~-------- ------- --- -- ~-----------~ r--~ --------- - i \ \ .soma M,a ,n~orv / / \ I o me \ / ~.. / / ~ \ E a~ \ ~ N I o Wm \ \\ ~ ~O ~ ti ~6 E~ o O ~oW°h / / N \ I Or \\ \\ ~ ~W4 h~4/ /~ ~ ~O I\ I fg Oyy \ \ ~ ~ it \, V ~ ©C r• ~ ~aJ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~, AGENDA Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.5.b. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land at the Terminus of Shell Road from Bellwood Property Holdings, LLC County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.270 acres at the terminus of Shell Road from Bellwood Property Holdings, LLC and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.270 acres at the terminus of Shell Road from Bellwood Property Holdings, LLC. This dedication is for improvements to Shell Road in conjunction with the development of Shell Road Industrial Park. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of a Parcel of Land at the Terminus of Shell Raad from Bellwood Property Holdings, LLC 3 P R VE NEUVPARK R D G ~o ~, t127Q Acre Dedlicati~n SAY ~~ o ~o ~- ~ Q~~~~ ~ o ~ ~, ~s~ ~w o~~ ~ ~~ ~~04 ~ O~yL ~~ N m fl ~ ~ g5' G 09 y~~ LAND CRS N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W I - 'E S 1 I~cl -666.67 Re t C3~®fl'71 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~! a try \ ~~ ~ ~ z ~~~~ ~~ k ~ d ~~ J l~ a J ~~~ E ~ .~~' ~ ~ ~ ~~° ~ a ~ Z~~ ~a a~~~ ~a!~ ~; ~ a~ 2 $ ° i J O 3 tai ~uE~ ~ ~~~~ ~ i~~ . ~ ~ W t. ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~p o ~ 1~ ~ o ~~~ W u ~ ~ ~ ~ /V1E~T.A+r~~ o ~ M~~p ry ~~K~ /KKK ~ O$ --------- ----~-- .` 4 ~ * ~~g ~'~ ~'. s ~~ ~ ~ h~ pp ~~ . ~. ~~; o~~ -- erg ~\''a Y ~ " ~ ~ _ Q ~ ``~ ~' sr/ ``~ ~ ~} ti ~ l~ f ~~ ~ 1 Olds ~ k~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ \ ~~ =i" r a ~ R ~ ~ -- -- ar ---° ~ ___ _ _, ~_~ ~ (~~Q~1'72 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~,. AGENDA Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.6.5.c. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Old Lane and Hopkins Road from Laverne C. Cole and James T. Waddill, IV County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested': Accept the conveyance of 10' parcels of land along Old Lane and 30' parcels of land along Hopkins Road from Laverne C. Cole and James T. Waddill, IV and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No OJOQ73 VICINITY SKETCH Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along Old Lane and Hopkins Raad from Laverne C. Cale and James T. Waddill, IV -'Y~, ~ ~4 ~~„ ~F~ ~ wWlf V~ ~ ~~~S ~~~o~~~ ~'~~r 30' drip of !arid to hs Dedicated .: ~,~~ I ~tl~ cr 1 ' Str~ of landta be Dedic#Ed s 10' Strip. of land to be Dedicated oRb ~[N I ~ 1t~' 3trtp of-land to be Dedicated ~N N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ;- ~E S r liol -666.67 #e t ~~~~~~ (!0 7~~I~ dad ~ i'`.~~.~ t o ~ 3 N few W!'Mhf~ ~! ~' ~ -,~~~ I MQ~Y'CEIRIfL 'n1A! 1yi~'•i0w0AllY 3t111Y~'! '20'AR Ste'! 0! 1!ti gGY1iLOL ASL • , 3tL2LF. IS CORl1ECT A11a L`dQ't.IL! ifi'17 T!E MI~12lNlt lJIOCEtiUpl3 • AfD '•i?~91tlDO ~srabrtsNe~ sY rxs rxxctxia s~r~re sow of altcu2ltC'l~. rsio~stoeu Eat wro su~YOns- ~u,n cart:rccn r~a~acnn ~acl•t~crs. ~,rxr.••:•: ~'. «~1r1~ `~ ~ . • ~ ,~ s, c- s'[~° - 30' E t!~a ^-: e I~ a f~LL 9EAQ~NGg ARE ~11~fiNE~ti~ LtGEND a - aOD 5ET i6~iE: 1" s ~Q' ca tt• ~isf ras • S- ~!-sti 0. to99 ACQ~ s~+Q oEa~u~o GNES~'[sR~ ElO ,~j~•oo~ . ~~~.,~ m w ODD ~3o Qlw}(RTC. 20Q1} PEAT SH4tiN~NC PARCEL OF ~.AKD _ C~N'CAINING 0.{e89 dCRES ~OCA~ED ON THE NORTH S1flE OF OLD L b-NE :~ DALE DkSSRICT CHEST~QFkEID COUNTY, ~~' ~~RGkNIA. Dare: ~-15-84 R dV. 4 - 2~ 8~ ~usrM Moaaa.aua+ + ~saocN~ t - ~ - s4 caMUU~q e~a~ • wo aaersroq s - i ~- d4 aas~ . vwo~a L,GT I~ ears ~s~ ~!~ •~~ 1 b8 t ~ SBA ,:.~.~t......t .. : ~,s: carxc~r .~: nss .sa~~ tit ~ 'ra so'r ar ~ aortsvoe -~ e~.sv. is ca~rtct +ua ~a~.~ `+s~ ~a ~*tMw faocetit~~ +~A ~wa~m ~'1'A~LISNED ~Y '!!IZ YI11CSl1IA 3TA'R •OMD 01 ~1C1[IZ~'1'~. l110~~lLAAL E!IC2. rauo svamoaa, ium catrrt~:so t.u+c~care iu~cic=~sczs._g~R Q. 11.6lr Mow as FORMEQLY ~ 3. W ADOILI- +- L. C. COLE ' 5Z'S'° - 3D' E t~7.ao~ _ ~~ f ~ ~~~~ W O ~ O e ~j ~- X 0.69 ~ ACRE ~ ,~ ~Al4~ 4fo24? ~ s 4~~~~40- R ~'iZ. QO' ' ~, s X1.4;' ~ ~ v pEp1C/-TtD ~* T • 7T . ~. rti~.~fY dR si s~ M4 46sCT c.~aswF~~ w NOTR~ ~~'!~' a w L ALL gGp,R1PiGS ~o .ve' ~~'b ~~. ARE MAGU~TtG .~ ~~ - w '~ ,Ml~c~t6D l~ LLD Lao a w}(R;~-2~Oi) ~ ~ L~G~ND _ o .ROD 5ET PL ~~ gKflWiNG PARCi L ~~g~D t'~l+l~ A1Tttt~~ x.69 ~,,~.t+~ ~. LQCATE4 QN Tf1E 1-M~ Sl~f~ OF QLt~ L «~~~ ~ QAL~ DISTRICT MES ~ cHE~~aF~ELO coup;Y, a a~,~.u.,.~ .a - vt~t~Iw1~,. ~taNS~' ' ou-ta: '~ - 8 - d4 ~~ ~ a ~ooM~ ~~~q ~ws r Wo ~~ a*s~ . rya _ _. CO ! - A l~'~ •..+.+..+r~~ u• a ~l~~b ~RTIM~~ - •.rri i Nf[le~bY :.CItTIR TNA'! '11iIS r01lIID11~'! EiNly~ Tp 111! ipti! Oi' MT ~O~ii~ JYw"p e~LIEl, L9 CORA1tLT AND COIQl.Iifl ~R7[ :t6 11"a1~111LN[ MIfJClbVb~ 4~D +.~'r~NfG11t'GR ~STAiLi3NNp 3Y '"ME rTN6Ilr!! l~IN!! !C~#D 01 AaCl1I~lESSLWIIIt. E~ I~. iJNiL SUZ1-~QJt~. ~laD C~l1jEa i~liClCAFY A~L!{I1ZCR~ (~, u/ M ~G~a` NQ +~os~: i NGR~S9 R•,lD ~6R1'Sa TO SOT 9NA1rL ty(± FROM vl.D C1kt~lNON RD. NiOTt : Al.l ~r~.R,~~s ~-+~~ MaCsNtT1C "14t,.t0' TG NORf H L11~1t VT rrV r,ANt , ExT`4 Aa -n~daKtO ------ 4% ~ILiFS i ~IITT u~rNSatt w.. s.-~ r•xaa N:f ~~, ~~~s~ 140. a4' p . a- o~~ Ai" R •23D' ,.,..{, G --•y ~}L • 4.18' T` I r V 1 r ~o• 5 { AC G j . ~N~~ 9l~-03 `~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ' • ~ ~o s • ~o oo y a" 2~.oa' ' ~ f ~ ~ L ~ 3~. Z? ~ T ~ 2'S.QO' ~.. ~ ~ sN ~ ~ !'. o•a•F~'~e ' er ~ ~ ~~ • zz,r.oi.z~ ' ~. d 1. ^ 7~. S} ' r' : i T • Sd.~T + . ~ J ~• 4 ~PpRax. 1_ocAtl~r~ LIMiT Of DREAS~ WORKS ~!~[iGND ~ • Rov s>w; 3SRIP Ot:QiCUTED TO CGJNTY OF r_+4taTtR~ilLC ~ ^ 'TS.oCI' T ~ 37.'~d' C ~ P~ AT ~NI41~4th~C~ ' ~ARC~~ ~F L a~fl C~~lSA1~11NG 13.51 ACRD L~C~TE~ Qn SHE YVESS 3tt~E Q~ h40pK14~1S ROAD DALE D~S~RMGT C~iESYtRF1~1.V G~I~~jY, IItIRTM NOCKEI~IOUC/4 ~ /1gOCl~~ REV. MAY 13,198 REV. wPR.4 ~ 19+li~ eao~~nw era~~ : ;.:ro tu~weraes ~t~ . rwoiwu I scup: 1' • 4Q' tl I Ci~l ~ - 4zD9 i I ~ ,roe + 3 - Ib'ai ~~~~~~ 9oflM[~g$5Pa5i~~V9 Z ll~Y C~31'PI~!' '1Zi11T IILR DO~C11lR StJ11R ~b '17~ ~~ ~ M ~Ori IUIL 9dILT, IS CORRECT AIID Cea4i.IGR ~'a !'RE M!I?II~1 lAOCmL1RN~ um ST+110~?Qs E~LI~ SY T~ YII~Ct~71i SS~1'i't 501 0~ aRCaz'~t~ls ltoE'~SLO,rAL ~G x~ Sl1RYplClQ= A11D t'p!'t'lTIID LJUrC5GlT6 t-11~tn'ELT3- t~~r,~,Ye~R ~~. ~~%~~ *~FL7F~ ~~ .~~~~ tl iR~S l ~NIIi ~ ectrr,.xr,~ w. KEAi01+L€ AL.R€5 sa.t~-atai ~ SU~ptylglb~F'SEC7~oA~ 3 ~~'f~ ~~+~ ~aT ~ ~° taMO s~' ~r ~~ ~~ ••` ~ ~ ~A ' ~ D ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~~ x ~ u2 O t ` ~ ~ ~_ r . ~°~ I ~~ a a o ~ i~ f~ ~•Q?1e'42"~ ~ R =2~.TSO.oa ~ 3 0 ~ L ~ 200.0' ~ ~; Z T ~ 1 OO.OOr ~ ~ p u ti ` w ~ 2 •YT '~~.~ ~ rl N ae~~~~;rw o .~~. x * 453b ~ ~ o NO; a`~ ~_ ~ s ilDDr FouNa AT ALL rreor~rtsY coreu~~5. PLAN SHCyWI~b ~.ZS AGI~F.S Q~ ~.aN~ ~o~cA~Ea a~ ~~~ w~s~ ~~~~ ~~ KDpi~t[~~ 14~Al~, SALE n ~ aTl? ! Cam, CH~STE~~IEL.~ CaUI~'TY, VI~tG~N1A ~~ rR. ~oo~ a.~: FED ~,,~9es „~,a„ ~ a ~socr-~r ooMStRtt~o • uro sun~rt~ d~.t~w- G H IE 4205 .ior • stagy ~~®~~~ --.,~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 M• AGENDA Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.6.a. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Fence and Landscaping to Encroach Within an Eight-Foot Easement and a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement, and a Concrete Driveway to Encroach Within an Eight-Foot Water and Sewer Easement Across Lot 69, Hartley Village At Charter Colony County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Grant Richard G. Edwards and Cynthia C. Edwards permission for a proposed fence and landscaping to encroach within an 8' easement and a 16' drainage easement, and a concrete driveway to encroach within an 8' water and sewer easement across Lot 69, Hartley Village At Charter Colony, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Richard G. Edwards and Cynthia C. Edwards have requested permission for a proposed fence and landscaping to encroach within an 8' easement and a 16' drainage easement, and a concrete driveway to encroach within an 8' water and sewer easement across Lot 69, Hartley Village At Charter Colony. This request has been reviewed by the Utilities Department, Environmental Engineering and Comcast Cablevision and the existing storm sewer will not be affected. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~®~'~~ VICINITY SKETCH Request Peitnission foi• a Proposed Fence said Landscapuig to Encroach ~'4'ithin an Eight Foot Easement and a Sixteen Foot Di•auiage Easement, and a Concrete Diivewa•y to Encroach Vbitltin an Eight Foot Watei• and Sewer Easement Across Lot 69, H~u•tley ti'illage At Charter Colony L~ REQUEST PERMISSICINFOR APROPOSED FENCE., LANDSGAPING & CONCRETE ,~ DRNEWAY. .Cf N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ~ - -E $ tact - N6.E tFet ~kc~y* ~ =Pink Dogwood . =Crepe Myrtle (White Natchez) =Crepe Myrtle (Muskogee) • = Nellie Stevens i = C t O ryp omer a 0 = Otto Luyken ~. A = s~Ai~ Cynthia C. Edwards Richard G. Edwards 1107 Bach Ln DB. 5988 PG. 718 PIN: 726699889000000 f c C This proRerty does not appear to lie ~~ f. ~7 , Ki thin a designated F. E. M. A. flood Zone area. Zone~as shoNn on F. I. R. M. C.P. / .5lGi?.35 D07~// ~ ~ E9n'1t effective 3-lG ~3 /x,540°Z2'OD"~ -~~ 'fl~~' ~~~ d ~ESmt ~ FAr fh s 8~, 1 1~ ~, 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ '~;1 ~: ~ X11 01 ~~ L .~ ~ ~o¢. ~. ~~ Scale: finch = 25 R 8¢ ~~'~ ~~ ~l~,,,o~; to fh~on ~F D ~o/IC ,Gra~ ~' 9f~u~%ir~+ l~ t3rick, frarrt~ ~ l0~ ~irtf l I C'o ~Pf~ ..,~; . ' ~ ~ 11 ~ . ~ ~ ~~. ~.-~~ . 4 ~Q . X __! 8 __8_ /lo Jroirj ~`~smt rf ~ ,~ ~I ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ ~~ 1 1+ ~ l~afP ~ ~,~, C= 9ro, 37; ~t°--?1~29.zZ "F/mod Prop., d idra.'/~^r~ss aicr Esrrit Esrrrt. (f'r~i~a~c~ i9 C~' L h'~1,/~ '~s~~m'P'~t • q.~M.e . ~~^~~'` ; . ~ Plat 5ho wiry' ~~~. ~ ~ `~:-~ L o t ~O 9 fear f /~y !~!//o9'e N~. ~ ~=~ I~IAtoQ ~a ~J~sfr~~ , T`. ~,.....;. ~:,'<~'`~ ~ IMPROVEMENT SURVEY ~ a~ O ~1. 2~D" CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.s.b. Subject: Request Permission for a Gravel Driveway to Encroach Within Fifty-Foot Unimproved County Rights of Way Known as Indian Springs Road and Upton Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Grant Anthony Niro and Nancy Niro permission for a gravel driveway to encroach within 50' unimproved county rights of way known as Indian Springs Road and Upton Road, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: On December 16, 2009 the Board approved a request from Mary Lotz Kauffmann, Trustee to construct a gravel driveway within 50' unimproved county rights of way known as Indian Springs Road and Upton Road from Point A to Point B as shown on the attached sketch to access property at 17900 Upton Road; however, the property was conveyed to Anthony and Nancy Niro prior to recordation of the license agreement. Approval is recommended. DIStrICt: Dale Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ®~®~1~2 VICINITY SKETCH Request Peiznission for a Gravel Driveway to Encroach Within Fifty Foot LTnimpioved County Rights of vvay known as >tdian Springs Road and Upton Road o ~Q U p REQUEST PERMISSION FOR ~ AGRAVEL DRIVEWAY REEby CREEK ,y i A D N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ~ • ~E $ r Irol - ir6.67 ket 0~0~~3 ~ ~\ / C ~ .,, i-- a Anthony Niro and Nancy Niro 7900 Upton Road DB. 8992 PG. 451 PIN: 780675813200000 LICENSE AREA FROM POINT A TO POINT B 1 OAN0143-1 Q~®~~4 / ~~ a m Z s p- a a Q CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.6.7. Subiect: Conveyance of an Easement to Southside Electric Cooperative County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Action Reauest~el`. Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Southside Electric Cooperative for overhead and underground cable to provide service to the cell tower site at Lake Chesdin Park. Summary of Information: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Southside Electric Cooperative for overhead and underground cable to provide service to the cell tower site at Lake Chesdin Park. This request has been reviewed by county staff. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #090085 VICINITY SKETCH Conveyance of an Easement to Southside Elechic Cooperative CUNVEYANC E O F Ail EASEMENT ~y~s Q ~~t s ~'~' s ~ ~ O v~~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w !~ -E ti s ~ ~r~~ - ssa.a3 fre t ~~o~~'~ SOUTHSIDE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Exhibit A SITE: R7750 ~ ~,TH ~ ~ ' r----~ I TowER i ~ i c+ 3 ° x LoNc snE 1 ~ g U<. Ne. L___ oox3Tz 2-3-i0 E17739276. 75 j a 1 `*~ SUR`fEy°! ~ I I 20' UNDERGROUND ~ ~ 300' urrurY 200' 100' 0' 1 EASEMENT i i SCALE: + ~roo• e~ I ~ ~ 1~ I ~ j.~ 100 ----{ zil 1 ~ +; A7NTON, EOWARO W OB 350, PG 573 COUNTY Oi' CNESTERFIEZO ~ ~ I j ` CP/N/ 7J<BJ24880 ZONED A OB 2695, Pf) 625 I I CP/Nf 7J46JOIBB7 U j 1 ZONED A fn1 1 ~ .o ~ l i ~ 1 N 1' W 'i 1 92.Bt'_J`~ 5 23'J4'<5' W 40' ABOVE GROUND ~ % UTILITY % o FJSEMENT % /t~O ~ EX~ ~~ /~ ~Qh ` PROP. POWER LINE /~1\~~. EX. POLE ~~~ EASEMENT PLAT OF ~~%% A 2D' UNDERGROUND AND 40' ABOVE GROUND EASEMENT BERMUDA DISTRICT - CHESl'ERFlELD CO. NRCENlA LONG SURVEYING, LLC FEB. 3, 2010 3408 SHERW000 BLUFF WAY POWHATAN, VA 23219 Legal Description Site ID: RI750 20' Under Ground Utility Easement Beginning at the northeastem corner of the parcel with a GPIN of 734630188100000; Thence S 01°43'57" E 36.92' along a tie line; Thence N 40°56'11" W 30.63' to the beginning center line of a 20' Underground Utility Easement; Thence S 23°34'45" W 92.61; Thence N 74°31'42" W 755.39' to the end of said easement. 40' Above Ground Easement Beginning at the northeastem corner of the parcel with a GPIN of 734630188100000; Thence S 01°43'57" E 36.92' along a tie line to the beginning centerline of a 40' Underground Easement; Thence N 40°56'11" W 30.63' to the end of said easement ~~®~~~ 4~, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ - - ~ ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 ~`° AGENDA Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B.8. Subject: Approval of 2010 Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) and Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Funding Requests County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to approve the 2010 RSTP and CMAQ funding requests submitted for the Richmond Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) consideration. Summary of Information: Annually, the Richmond Area MPO approves projects to be funded with Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) and Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funds for upcoming fiscal years. An average of approximately $6.2 million in RSTP and $4.6 million in CMAQ funds are anticipated for the region, annually, for FY11 - FY14. To comply with the MPO's application deadline, staff has submitted the following funding requests. At VDOT's request, staff has asked for an additional $1.5 million in CMAQ funds for the Courthouse Road at Route 360 District: Countywide (Continued on next page) Preparers R.J. McCracken Title: Director of Transportation agen734 Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ~~~ ~~® CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary (Continued): Right Turn Lane Improvement Project to address an estimated project cost increase. Two hundred thousand dollars in CMAQ funds can be transferred from the VDOT Route 10 at Beach Road Dual Left Turn Lane project which is now part of the county's Route 10 Bond project. A request for $1.3 million in CMAQ funds is also being recommended. Staff has submitted a $6 million application for new RSTP funding for a Route 360 (Winterpock Road to Woodlake Village Parkway), East or West Bound Lane (to be determined) Widening Project. Route 360 is currently carrying approximately 43,000 vehicles per day at a Level of Service D. If funding is secured, staff will evaluate traffic volumes for the east and west bound lanes in order to determine which direction to address with the project. Staff has also submitted a $5 million application for new RSTP funding for a Route 1 at Old Bermuda Hundred Road Intersection Improvement Project. Sight distance is poor at the intersection contributing to a high number of accidents. Staff recommends the Board approve the 2010 CMAQ and RSTP funding requests. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board approve the following 2010 CMAQ and RSTP funding requests for MPO consideration: 1) Transfer of $200,000 from the VDOT Route 10 at Beach Road Dual Left Turn Lane Project to the VDOT Courthouse Road at Route 360 Right Turn Lane Project; 2) Request for an additional $1.3 million in CMAQ funds for the Courthouse Road at Route 360 Right Turn Lane Project; 3) Request for $6 million in RSTP funds for a new Route 360 (Winterpock Road to Woodlake Village Parkway), East or West Bound Lane (to be determined) Widening Project; and 4) Request for $5 million in RSTP funds for a new Route 1 at Old Bermuda Hundred Intersection Improvement Project. (~"~®~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA ~,~s Budget and Management Comments: This item requests that the Board approve the 2010 RSTP and CMAQ funding requests submitted for the Richmond Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) consideration. RSTP and CMAQ funds are federal dollars allocated to regional transportation projects by the MPO. If this request is approved VDOT will manage the identified projects. None of these funds are county appropriations and this request does not require a local contribution. Preparers Allan M. Carmodv Title: Director, Budget and Management (~'~®~~~ Route 360 (Winterpock Rd to Woodlake Village Pkwy) East or West Bound (to be determined) Widening Project 312-10 ~~®~~~ Route 1 /Old Bermuda Hundred Road Intersection Improvement Project rsmithbWCMA~-RSTP/f 0 Projects/Rt 1-OBH 3-12-10 ~JIV ®~~AI CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 ~~. AGENDA Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 8.B. ~1 _ Subject: Set a Public Hearing for April 14, 2010, to Consider Amendments to County Code Sections 4-25 (c) and (d) relating to Fees for Adoption of Sterilized Animals from the Chesterfield County Animal Shelter and the Transfer of Animals to Humane Societies and Rescue Organizations County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Set Public Hearing for April 14, 2010, to consider amendments to County Code § 4-25 (c) and (d) . Summary of Information: In December 2009, the Board adopted a resolution regarding the sheltering of animals in the Chesterfield County Animal Shelter. In part, the resolution called for the spaying and neutering of all healthy, adoptable companion animals prior to adoption from the animal shelter. Accordingly, an Invitation for Bid was advertised for spay and neuter services and the contract has been awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. This proposed increase in the adoption fee will defray the cost of sterilization services. In addition, the services provided will include a Preparers Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis Title: Chief of Police 1305:83469.2(83472.2) Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No OJO!193 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA rabies shot which will make the process much more convenient for the new owner of the animal. The amount of the proposed fee was determined after reviewing the successful bid for the spay and neuter contract and benchmarking the fees charged in neighboring jurisdictions. The police department believes the new $60.00 fee provides a reasonable and appropriate charge for the adoption of a pet which will cover the new costs. A technical correction of a citation to the Code of Virginia is made in subsection (d). The proposed delayed effective date is intended to accommodate the final approval of the spay and neuter contract. 1305:83469.2(83472.2) ~~®~~"~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 4-25 RELATING TO FEES FOR ADOPTION OF STERILIZED ANIMALS AND TRANSFER OF ANIMALS TO ANIMAL RESCUE OR HUMANE SOCIETIES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 4-25 of the Code of the Count~of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 4-25. Confinement and disposition of animals; animal shelter; redemption by owner; shelter charges. 000 (c) Any p member of the public adopting a sterilized dog or cat from the animal shelter shall pay a fee of ~18~8 $60.00 which shall be disposed of in the same manner as dog license taxes. ^ aa~+_~~~"~~ «°,.~°« „,•,.,.~,,,~:«,. „ ,,.~~*°,.;':,°,, ,, ~ ` + ~ ~,~, ' Yn~iw, .,~.. fc~ n °«4 .~~+1.° ° ° r+ nL,n~~ 1.° +ti.° ..° ..: L.;~:+.. °~+ti,° n° ,.ti... .,.a ..«+.. +L... ,~.. ,~ ,. ~ ~„i.:°°+ +° ., ,:~ «° „~+., «°+ +° ° °°a ecn nn Such adoption will include the provision of any initial rabies vaccination as required by applicable law. No fee will be charged for transfers of unsterilized animals to anv animal rescue or humane society validly designated as a non- rp ofit 501(03) organization under applicable law. (d) At any time after the confinement period for the animal expires and the animal has not been claimed, it may be (i) euthanized by one of the methods approved by the state veterinarian and the animal warden shall cremate, bury or sanitarily dispose of same; (ii) disposed of by sale or gift to a federal agency, state-supported institution, agency of the commonwealth, agency of another state, or a licensed federal dealer having its principal place of business in the commonwealth, provided that such agency, institution or dealer agrees to confine the animal for an additional period of not less than five days; (iii) delivered to any humane society or animal shelter within the commonwealth; (iv) delivered to any person who is a resident of the county who will pay the required license tax and adoption fee for such animal; (v) delivered to anon-county resident who pays the required adoption fee; or (vi) delivered for the purposes of adoption or euthanasia only, to a humane society or an animal shelter located in and lawfully operating under the laws of another state, provided that such humane society or animal shelter: (1) maintains records that comply with Code of Virginia, § ~.' ''T~~ 3.2-6557; (2) requires that adopted dogs and cats be sterilized; and (3) has been approved by the state veterinarian, or his designee, as a facility which maintains such records, requires adopted dogs and cats to be sterilized, and provides adequate care and euthanasia. 1305:83472.2 1 ~ ~ ®~'~~ 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective upon certification by the County Administrator that a spay and neuter service contract has been duly executed and that such date shall be included in the County Code. ~~®'~~~ 1305:83472.2 2 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 9.A. Subject: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Acceptance of attached report. Summary of Information: Preparers James J. L. Stegmaier Title: County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # Q~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE March 24, 2010 Board Meeting Date Description Amount Balance 07/01/09 FY2010 Beginning Budgeted Balance $53,495,000 ®~®~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS March 24, 2010 Board Meeting Date Description Amount Balance FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2008 4/9/2008 FY2009 Budgeted Addition $17,810,300 $22,647,488 4/9/2008 FY2009 Capital Projects (16,792,400) 5,855,088 6/24/2009 Tax Collection Customer Service project (244,400) 5,610,688 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2009 4/9/2009 FY2010 Budgeted Addition $13,946,400 $19,557,088 4/9/2009 FY2010 Capital Projects (13,946,400) 5,610,688 ®~®~49 ~ ~ N ~ ^O ~ C ~ '~ M o 0 v N ~ O ~ ~ ~ C> ~ 69 ~--' b 9 69 6r9 69 ~ R R Qa ~ C 0 R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ 69 M ~ ~ ,~ N M ~ O Q z ~ ~ ~, "C +„ G~ O~ O .~ ~ .-. ~ A ~ N O oo O ~ 0 0~ W ~ m O ^p +' M N M ~n M N O N ~O ~ C L W N ~ y ~ ~ O ~'' a, ~ a ~ ~i ~~Rrr "'~ C ~ p O O . F o ~; 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 V N ea v? v~ ~n ~n ~n ~n ~ w ~ v ~ ~ v H ~ O Q CC > ~D l~ [~ N 00 Q O~ N O O o0 ~ L y O y. ~ M 69 000 M ~ ~ L CO A. U as ... ~ ;ti R x R R 3 V 7 L R ++ ~ ' ~ to A oq p U . D '. R ~ .a ~ O U t~~~1~~ Prepared by Accounting Department February 28, 2010 Date Began 04/99 O1/O1 03/03 03/04 10/04 12/04 12/04 OS/OS 05/06 08/07 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED AND EXECUTED Original Description Amount Public Facility Lease -Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project Energy Improvements at County Facilities Energy Improvements at School Facilities Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems Certificates of Participation -Building Expansion/Renovation, Equipment Acquisition TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Description None 13,725,000 6,100,000 21,970,000 16,596,199 1,519,567 427,633 14,495,000 11,960,000 22,220,000 125.113.399 Outstanding Date Balance Ends 02/28/2010 11/19 $8,050,000 11/21 6,735,000 11/23 4,180,000 11 /24 16,270,000 10/10 16,596,199 12/17 1,132,880 12/ 10 91,493 11/24 10,375,000 11/24 8,745,000 11/27 19,880,000 92.055.572 Approved Amount oa~~~~~ March 24, 2010 Speaker's List Evening Session #1 (Following Presentation of Resolutions) 1. Ms. Brenda Stewart 2. Mr. L.J. McCo 3. 4. 5. Evening Session #2 (End of the Evening Agenda) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Chesterfield County Branch NAACP L.J. McCoy, Jr. President Ik. Cheryl Biggins Vice President Demetria Baugh Secretary James Clark Treasurer Rev. L Pollard Chaplin Wednesday, March 24, 2010 To the honorable Chairman of the Board Mr. Dan Decker, Vice Chair Mr. James Holland, board members, and County Administrator Mr. James J. L. Stegmaier, my name is L. J. McCoy, Jr., president of the Chesterfield NAACP. While education budgets are reduced signficantly throughout this great country of ours and real estate values have dedined, it is widely known and understood that some additional funding is needed to support our county's dwindling financial resources. Recently this board of supervisors had an opportunity to approve a revenue neutral tax incx+ease to reduce the budget gap in the education of the students here in the county. Yet it was rejected. I'm retinrd, and like many Chesterfield County residents, live on a fixed income. I own real estate in this county. Again, like many Chesterfield County residents, I believe even I can make a sacrifice for education, during these very tough times. But, instead of increasing taxes to replace lost revenue, a derision was made to reduce services. It is reported that there woukd be a million dollars saved upon Dosing Penymont Middle School. The Chesterfield NAACP feels it is horrible to make the most needy studenrts bear the brunt of the finandal burden of the county. Esperially when there have been no corresponding cuts to the funds going to support the Maggie L Walker Governor's School. Question, did the board and administration look and fully consider the solutions offered by the branch's education chair, Mr. Arthur Almore? To illuminate our position Mr. Almone's commentary was published in this past Sunday's Richmond Times Dispatch Letter to the Editor Correspondence of the Day (Mar+ch 21, 2010). ft seems evident that the Richmond Times Dispatch agrees with the position of the Chesterfield County NAACP. Amazingl Please understand our suggestions are only done in a concerted effort to strengthen this county's most valuable asset -our children. Thank you. Re II . J. Mc , Jr. Branch President 417 Osborne Rd. Chester, VA 23831 mccov i~tlonverizon net P.O. Box 246 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 804.768.002 www. chesterfieldnaacp, org CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ~~, Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 16.A. Subiect: Public Hearing on Proposed Ordinance Amendments Relating to Department of Utilities Fee Changes County Administrator's Cs~mments: County Administrator: Hold a public hearing on proposed ordinance amendments relating to Department of Utilities fee changes. Summary of Information: This date and time had been scheduled to hold a public hearing on proposed Utilities ordinance fee changes. The Utilities Department's analysis of the FY2011 budget, capital replacement projects, and projections over the next ten years indicate that current revenues, without fee increases, will not be sufficient to cover operating expenses. As an enterprise fund fully supported by payments from users, fee increases are necessary to offset costs of capital projects to comply with the nutrient regulations for the Chesapeake Bay, pump station rehabilitation, new and replacement water tanks, new and replacement water lines, the county's contractual share of Richmond water plant projects, as well as maintaining the integrity of the county's water and wastewater facilities. While the FY2011 budget is proposed to be 14 percent below the FY2010 adopted budget, additional revenues are required to meet the projected longer term costs. A comparison of the FY2010 and proposed FY2011 budgets indicates that personnel costs would be reduced 3.4 percent, operating costs reduced 8 percent, capital would be reduced 1.6 percent and debt would be reduced 38.9 percent due to the retirement of bonds in FY2010. A slight revenue decrease is also anticipated for FY2011. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No ~o~o~~z CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information (continued) The proposed charges for a typical 5/8" residential size meter having an 18 CCF combined water and wastewater bi-monthly bill will increase by approximately $2.58 ($1.29 monthly). The increase is comprised of changes in both the commodity and base charges. The wastewater commodity charge is proposed to increase by $0.05 per one hundred cubic feet (CCF) and is anticipated to generate an additional $595,000 in revenues. The water and wastewater bi-monthly base charges for a typical 5/8" residential size meter is proposed to increase by $1.68 and is anticipated to generate an additional $1,168,000. These increases are needed to cover the projected cost of rendering water and wastewater utility services and funding capital replacement projects and will increase a typical bi-monthly bill to $90.60. The base charges for larger meters increases proportionately based on meter size. In addition, the department's analysis of costs for expansion projects and projections over the next ten years reflect the need for a connection fee adjustment to cover capital costs. The connection fees for a 5/8" residential size meter are proposed to increase in water from $4,025 to $4,400 (generating an additional $680,000) and in wastewater from $3,140 to $3,455 (generating an additional $439,600). The connection fees for larger meters will increase proportionately based on meter size. Even after the proposed rate increases (assuming a typical bill for combined services), the County's rates will still be significantly less than surrounding jurisdictions. In addition, the industrial strong waste surcharge for Total Suspended Solids TSS) is proposed to increase to cover the department's cost of treating this waste. This charge is increasing from $0.13 per pound to $0.21 per pound (generating additional estimated revenue of $8,680). The ordinance is attached. ~~®~..~~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 18-22 AND 18-27 RELATING TO WATER AND WASTEWATER CONNECTION FEES AND WATER AND WASTEWATER USER FEES CHARGES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 18-22 and 18-27 of the Code o the Count~o Chester reld 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 18-22. Connection fees. 000 [NOTE: Section (a), describing the method of determining connection fees, is unchanged and therefore not set out here] (b) The capital cost recovery charge shall be: Customer Class Meter Number Capital Cost Recovery Charge Size of ERU's (inches) per Unit Water Wastewater (i) For a dwelling, single-family, 5/8 1.00 $ 4,~~-A9 $ 3~q.~~g including townhouses, mobile homes 4,400.00 3,455.00 that are not located in a mobile home park, and individually metered multifamily dwellin units. (ii) For a dwelling, two-family (per unit) 5/8 1.00 4;95-A9 ~4g:gg 4,400.00 3,455.00 (iii) For mobile homes that are located in a 0.85 2,^~- '~ ~9-A9 mobile home park and for master 3,740.00 2,937.00 metered multiple-family dwellings other than multiple-family dwellings used exclusively as housing for colle es and/or universities (per unit) (iv) For all other customer classes 5/8 1.00 n,n~ ~,' 4,400.00 3,455.00 1 2.50 ~A;9C-3-A9 ~,$~gg 11,000.00 8,638.00 1 %s 5.00 ~n i ~c nn ~~ ~88:A8 22,000.00 17,275.00 2 8.00 ~~ inn nn ~~o ~c ~ ~n nn ~:~ 35,200.00 27,640.00 ®~©~~~ 0505:80582.1 1 3 16.00 b4;4A&A9 ~9~48:A9 70,400.00 55,280.00 4 25.00 ~-9A~~9 7S39A:A9 110,000.00 86,375.00 6 50.00 ~ni ~cn nn ~~~o ~ , 220,000.00 172,750.00 8 80.00 2~~ nnn nn ~ci inn nn ~~ 352,000.00 276,400.00 10 115.00 ^~'~~ ~6~~gg:Ag 506,000.00 397,325.00 12 155.00 ~'~~~ 456;7~A:A9 682,000.00 535,525.00 The capital cost recovery charge for meters that are larger than 12 inches shall be determined by the director based on the number of ERUs er unit. (v) The capital cost recovery charge for a dwelling that is served by a meter that is larger than five- ei hths inch shall be the same ca ital cost recovery charge in subsection (b)(iv). 000 [NOTE: The following are unchanged and not set out here: Fees related to installing meters and service lines, provision for wastewater laterals, provision for installment payment of connection fees, provision relating to enterprise zones and block grant funds, and provisions relating to connection fees for extensions to developed areas.] Sec. 18-27. Utility charges. Effective with bills issued on and after July 1, ~9 2010, the consumer shall pay charges for utility service in accordance with the following schedules: (a) Monthly service charges. The monthly service charge shall be: (1) Customer cost charge. A customer cost charge of $~A8 2.22 for each service account. However, customers who have only a water account or a wastewater account shall pay a customer cost charge of $4~9 4.44. (2) Commodity cost charge. (i) Water: $1.24 per 100 cubic feet (Ccf). (ii) Wastewater: $x-:45 1.50 per 100 cubic feet (Ccf). (3) Capacity cost charge. Customer Class Meter Number Monthly Capacity Charge Size of ERU's (inches) per Unit Water Wastewater (i) Dwelling, single-family, including 5/8 1.00 $ 3~9 $ 10.60 townhouses and mobile homes that 5.60 are not located in a mobile home ark (ii) Dwelling, two-family (per unit) 5/8 1.00 ~9 10.60 5.60 (iii) Mobile homes that are located in a 0.85 4~ 9.01 mobile home park and multiple-family 4.76 dwellings other than multiple-family dwellings used exclusively as housing for colleges or universities (per unit) (iv) All other customer classes 5/8 and 1.00 3~9 10.60 3/4 5.60 1 2.50 ~-A9 26.50 14.00 11/2 5.00 ~:-A9 53.00 28.00 2 8.00 4~9 84.80 44.80 3 16.00 8~9 169.60 89.60 4 25.00 ~A:A9 265.00 140.00 6 50.00 X69:98 530.00 280.00 8 80.00 4-1-Fr.98 848.00 448.00 10 115.00 688 1,219.00 644.00 12 155.00 SAE~88 1,643.00 868.00 (v) The capacity cost charge for a dwelling that is served by a meter that is larger than five-eighths inch shall be the ca acity cost char a in subsection (a)(3)(iv). (b) Ancillary charges. 000 ~~®'~ ~'S 0505:80582.1 (5) I Strong waste surcharge BOD Surcharge Rate (RBOD) _ $0.23 per pound TSS Surcharge Rate (RTSS) _ $9~ 0.21 per pound TN Surcharge Rate (RTN) _ $0.00 per pound TP Surcharge Rate (RTP) _ $0.00 [NOTE: Ancillary changes for testing, portable meters, voluntary disconnections and septage dumping are unchanged and not set out here.] 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective July 1, 2010. ~~®'~.~~ osos:so582.1 4 Your Comrmrnity Nen spuper Since 1995 ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors LN:UtilitiesOrdinance 3-3, 10 Full Page $1,200.00 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/03/2010 & 3/10/2010 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ ~ da of Y ATTACH AD HERE 2010. Legal Affiant ~ Jas T, Grooms Jr., Notary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 S (SEAL) ~ : ~ EXPIPES ~, : 7D " d : ~ 02-29'12 .,~~ T••..... Pv `~~~. O THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. PO. Ros 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 231 I3 • Phone: (R0~) j4S-7100 • Fax: (A0-}) 7.14-3269 • Ernail: news@chesterfieldohserveecom • Inicrnet•. www.chesterfieldobscrver.a>m Public Hearing #1 - 6:30 p.m. To Consider an Amendment to the County Code Relating to Utilities Fees THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO UTILITIES FEES SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. UTILITIES FEES Name ,Organization/Address 1 George Beadles ', _ 2 ___ ---- 3 - - 4 5 6 --- --- 7 ' - -_ - __ 8 _____ ---------------------------------------- - 9 10 -- -- - 11' .~ - --- - -- - -- -- -- --- _ --- t 12 I ~--- 13I '~ -- , 14 ___-- 15 16 i, 17 '' 18~ 19 - -- -_...____ _ - 20 ~ ------ 22I 24 _ 25I 26 ~ ---- -- --- 27' 28 --- - 29 30'~ 31 32'~ ~ *~; CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ~. Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 16.B. Subject: Public Hearing on Proposed Ordinance Amendments Relating to Issuance of Business Licenses County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Hold a public hearing on proposed ordinance amendments relating to Issuance of Business Licenses. Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on proposed changes to the ordinance relating to stipulation for issuance of a business license. The proposed code revision for issuance of a business license would allow the county to collect all delinquent taxes prior to issuance of a business license. This change is proposed due to the pending implementation of a new, fully-integrated tax assessment, billing, and collection system that will allow tremendous customer service efficiencies, as well as the ability to fully automate collection activity across tax types that previously have been manually administered. The City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, Goochland County, Spotsylvania County, City of Fairfax, Accomack County, the Town of Ashland, City of Winchester, Portsmouth, and the City of Norton all currently have this procedure in place. Additionally, the ordinance proposes a technical change to allow for the assessment of the interest penalties on delinquent taxes to be automatically calculated at the beginning of the next month after they were due. The requested change will allow the county to convert from a manual to an automated process for the assessment of penalties. The ordinance also proposes a new category for business licenses, Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA adding a "Limited Mixed Beverage Retailer" category for businesses meeting this Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control classification. All of the requested changes to the business license code sections are not anticipated to generate any additional revenue in FY2011 or beyond. The ordinance is attached. Q~®~.~~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 6-1 AND 6-15 RELATING TO WHEN PENALTIES ACCRUE FOR LATE FILING OF LICENSE TAXES AND THE PAYMENT OF OTHER DELINQUENT TAXES AND ADDING SECTION 6-39.1 TO ADD A CLASSIFICATION FOR LIMITED MIXED BEVERAGE RETAILERS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 6-1 and 6-1 S of the Code o the County of Chester reld 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted and Section 6-39.1 is added to read as follows: Sec.6-1. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context requires a different meaning: Base year means the calendar year preceding the license year, except for contractors subject to the provisions of Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3715. He,~=e~=~rt~ic~ce~~~, ~~ ~~ ''° +''° ~'°""' ` ° °"`""" g-~~~end~=e~e~g-~k~se~e-yew Businesses who report on a fiscal year basis as of January 1 2010 may continue to report in that manner for the duration of their business activity. 000 Sec. 6-15. Due dates and penalties. (a) Each person subject to licensure under this chapter shall apply for a license and pay the applicable tax and fee prior to beginning business if he was not subject to licensure in the county on or before January 1 of the license year, or no later than March 1 of the license year if he was subject to licensure in the county prior to January 1 of the license year. (b) A penalty of one percent of the unpaid tax and fee for each day the tax and/or fee is unpaid up to ten percent of the unpaid tax and fee, or $2.00, whichever is greater, shall be imposed upon the failure to pay the tax and/or fee on or before March 1 if the person was in business prior to January 1 of the license year; or bean business before February 1 of the license ,near; or within ~A-days one month of beginning business if the person ~ bemoan business prier~e after January ~ 31 of the license year. In the case of an assessment of additional tax made by the commissioner of the revenue, if the application and, if applicable, the payment were made in good faith and the understatement of the tax was not due to any fraud, reckless or intentional disregard of the law by the taxpayer, there shall be no late payment penalty assessed with the additional tax. If any assessment of tax by the commissioner of the revenue is not paid within 30 days, the treasurer may impose a ten percent late payment penalty. If the failure to file or pay was not the fault of the taxpayer, the penalty shall not be imposed, or if imposed, shall be abated by the commissioner of the revenue. In order to demonstrate lack of fault, the taxpayer must show that he acted responsibly and that the failure was due to events beyond his control. 000 (c) Interest shall be charged on the late payment of the tax and fee from the due date until the date paid without regard to fault or other reason for the late payment. For persons who 0623 :83061.1 (~ ~ ®',~ were in business in the county prior to Januazy 1 of the license year, interest shall be assessed on the unpaid balance on April 1 of the license yeaz and thereafter on the first day of each following month on the unpaid balance. For persons who were not in business in the county on January 1 of the license year, interest shall be assessed on the unpaid balance ewe on the first day of the month after the month in which such taxpayer became delinquent, and thereafter on the first day of each following month on the unpaid balance. Whenever an assessment of additional or omitted tax or fee by the commissioner of the revenue is found to be erroneous, all interest and penalty chazged and collected on the amount of the assessment found to be erroneous shall be refunded together with interest on the refund from the date of payment or the due date, whichever is later. Interest shall be paid on the refund of any license tax or fee from the date of payment or due date, whichever is later, whether attributable to an amended return or other reason. Interest on any refund shall be paid at the same rate chazged under Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3916. No interest shall be paid on a refund or charged on a late payment, provided the refund or the late payment is made not more than 30 days from the date of the payment that created the refund or the due date of the tax, whichever is later. 000 ~e,~ No business license shall be issued until the applicant has produced satisfactory evidence that all delin uent business licenses ersonal ro ert and transient occu anc taxes owed by the business to the county have been paid which have been properly assessed a ainst the applicant by the count 000 6-39.1. Limited Mixed Beverage Retailers. ~ Every retail merchant classified by the Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control as a "Limited Mixed Beverage Restaurant" shall pay in addition to the license tax and fees imposed under this code, an annual license tax as follows• With a seating capacity at tables for up to 100 persons $100• With a seating capacity at tables for more than 100 but not more than 150 persons $250; and With a seating capacity at tables for more than 150 persons $400 No license shall be issued to any person pursuant to the terms of this section unless such person shall have secured or shall secure simultaneously therewith and have in force the proper state license provided by law. ~, In imposing retail merchant's license taxes measured by gross receipts under anv_ other section of this chapter, there shall be included the gross receipts from the sale of limited mixed beverages in the basis for measuring such license taxes No limited mixed beverage license tax assessed under this section shall be construed as exempting anv licensee from any retail merchant's license taxes required under this Code or from any beer and wine license taxes or from mixed alcoholic beverage license taxes reauired under this Code (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0623:83061.1 ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN:BusniessLicenseTax Board of Supervisors 3-10, 17 ~., TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Boazd of Supervisors ~~ of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at an '~ adjourned meeting on Wednesday, Mazch 24, 2010 at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Route 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons affected `may appeaz and present thew views to 'consider: AN ORDINANCE TO AMENll THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 6-1 AND 6-15 RELATING TO WHEN PENALTIES ACCRUE FOR LATE FILING OF LICENSE TAXES AND THE PAYMENT OF OTHER DELINQUENT TAXES AND ADDING SECTION 6-39.1 TO ADD A CLASSIFICATION FOR LIMITED MIXED BEVERAGE RETAILERS A County Administrator's office, Room 504, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield County, Virginia and may be examined by all interested persons between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday of each regular business day. All persons wishing to present their views on this subject aze encouraged to call the Office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors at (804) 748-1200 to be placed on the speakers list, or may appear and sign up at 6 p.m. before the meeting. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Board, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Boazd no later than Friday, Mazch 19, 2010. 1/1 OP $250.00 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/10/2010 & 3/17/2010 My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission LD. 7182093 (SEAL) ~'~ "~. ., .~ ~ `" R ' C,~ ~. ~5 ~ ~QK,L"I E A~ ~y ~St EXPIRES a ; ~ ~ w° 02-29-12 T ~718209~ ~ R `~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. P.O. Bos 1616. Vlidluthixn, Virginia231 I? • Phone: (8041?4>-7j(N) • Fax: (8(W) 7~J4-3269 • Email: news(c~chesterticldobscrvcr.com • Internet: www.chestcrtieldobserver.com Sworn to and subscribed before me this r ~ ~ day of Public Hearing #2 - 6:30 p.m. To Consider an Amendment to the County Code Relating to the Issuance of Business Licenses THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUSINESS LICENSES SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. - ----- BUSINESS LICENSE FEES ,Name - _ _ 'Organization/Address 1 I George Beadles - _--- - 2', 3 -- - -- 4, - -- 5 - --- 7 - -- - - 8 - ---- ---- 9 - 10 12I I~, -- -- 13' - - - ~'~ -- - - - 14 ' 15 ---- ------- - ~ -- 16' _ 17'' - -- '~ --- --- -- 18 19 I --- 20 __- 21 -- - - 22'~, ', 23 ~~~ - --- --- 25 26I ---- ----- 27 '', ~--- ---- 29' -- -- ---- 30 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meetina Date: March 24.2010 Item Number: 16 C Subject: Public Hearing on the Service Fees for Emergency Ambulance Transport County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a Public Hearing on the Service Fees for Emergency Ambulance Transport Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on the proposed changes to the service fees charged for emergency ambulance transports and additional technical changes. This fee was established to recover costs typically reimbursed by Medicare and commercial insurance companies for the cost of emergency transport services and to enhance emergency medical services. The fees generated from the revenue recovery program only partially offset the cost of providing emergency medical transport/rescue services in Chesterfield County. Over time, the allowable Medicare and commercial insurance company reimbursement rates for emergency medical care and transportation have been adjusted and are now higher than Chesterfield's current charges. The requested changes in the emergency ambulance transport fee schedule would allow the county to recover costs in accordance with allowable insurance and Medicare rates. The revenue recovery fee schedule was last adjusted in April of 2008, the only time since inception of the program in July of 2002. This increase has been recommended by the Internal Audit Department and is supported by the Fire and EMS Department. The estimated revenue to be generated from the fee increase is $175,000 for FY2011. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Budget and Management ^ No o~oa~.z AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 10-10 RELATING TO SERVICE FEES FOR EMERGENCY AMBULANCE TRANSPORT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 10-10 of the Code o the County o Chesterfield 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 10-10. Service fees for emergency ambulance transport. (a) Pursuant to Code of Virginia, § 32.1-111.14, it is hereby determined and declared that the exercise of the powers and duties set forth herein is necessary to assure the provision of adequate and continuing emergency services and to preserve, protect and promote the public health, safety and general welfare. (b) Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to ambulance charges: Basic life support (BLS), Advanced life support level 1 (ALS-1), and Advanced life support level 2 (ALS-2) shall be those services as defined by applicable federal or state regulations and administered in accordance with applicable law. Ground transport mileage (GTM) shall be assessed from the location of the point of pick-up of the patient to a hospital or other facility where a patient is transported. (c) The schedule of rates for emergency ambulance transport services by the county department of fire and emergency medical services (including any volunteer rescue squad with which Chesterfield Fire and EMS has a billing agreement) shall be as follows: Service Fee BLS X89 $394.00 ALS-1 4~:A9 468.00 ALS-2 ~A9 677.00 GTM S3A 9.60 per patient loaded mile in addition to transport charges (d) The chief of the county department of fire and emergency medical services is hereby authorized and directed to establish policies and procedures, and to execute and maintain documentation necessary for the administration of this program, including, but not limited to, a subscription program for county residents or other eligible persons, and payment standards for those persons who demonstrate economic hardship, as permitted by applicable law. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective July 1, 2010. 2723:83311.1 ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN:AmbulanceFee 3-10 ,17 Board of Supervisors TAKE NOTICE Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at an adjourned meeting on Wednesday, March 24, 2010 at 6:30 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Route 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public hearing where persons affected may appear and present their views to consider: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, 1 col x 5.16 in. $230.63 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/10/2010 & 3/17/2010 BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 10-10 RELATING TO SERVICE FEES FOR EMERGENCY AMBULANCE Sworn to and subscribed before me this ( da of TRANSPORT y A copy of the ordinance is on County Administrator's office, Ro 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield Virginia and may be examine interested persons between the 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday Friday of each regulaz business da All persons wishing to present the on this subject aze encouraged the Office of the Clerk to the B Supervisors at (804) 748-1200 to b on the speakers list, or may appear up at 6 p.m. before the meeting. file in the /~ om 504, ~~~t/) ~C~ , 2010• dCby atyll~ hours of through ~+ y C it views t° ~~ Legal Affiant J T, Grooms Jr., Notary blic oazd of e placed and sign The heazing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Anypersons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley Clerk to the Boazd, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk to the Boazd no later than Friday, March 19, 2010. My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) ``,1•\\\111111)111/lI// ~` GROp •. y. ~• 4. ~~ •~t ~ . ~~ FXPIi~ES o : ~ d ; c°~ 02-29-12 9~ " -' : si 1820 ~ ARY THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. PO. Box 1616. Midlothian, Vir~~inia Z31 I; • Phonr: (80-1) i:)S-7i(H) • Fax: (R(k3) 7~J=4-326rI • F.rnail: news@chestertieldobserver.com • Internet: www.chesterficldobservcr.com Public Hearing #3 - 6:30 p.m. To Consider an Amendment to the County Code Relating to Emergency Ambulance Transport THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO SERVICE FEES FOR EMERGENCY AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. EMS EMERGENCY AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SERVICE FEES Name __ 'Organization/Address 1 'George Beadles 2, jl~ 1CCV" '' r~uda '~~~rM~c 3 it ~~iG t V~ 4'~ ~t ~] c ~ ~ ~' 5' ~. 7 ---- --------------- -- - - - - 8 -- --- 9 10 -- --------- --- -- 11' 12 ___ - 13 '', -- 14 ' -- -- ---- 15 ---- 16 17 ---'. 18 ---_ ----- -, -- 19 _ ._ ----- - 20' - --- 211 22 --- -- 23 '' 24' _+_ 25 26 -- 27 --- ----- 28 29 -- --- 30 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA IA9 Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 16.D. Subject: Public Hearing on Proposed 2010 Tax Rates County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Hold a Public Hearing on the Proposed 2010 Tax Rates Ordinance Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on tax rates for the tax year 2010. The County Administrators Proposed FY2011-FY2012 Biennial Financial Plan holds all rates constant with a real estate tax rate of $0.95 in 2010. The real estate tax rate advertised for this public hearing is $0.95. Based on the advertisement, the Board of Supervisors cannot adopt a real estate tax rate higher than $0.95 on April 14"', 2010. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Budget and Management ^ No # Ofl04,14 AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY ON VARIOUS CLASSES OF PROPERTY FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That for the year beginning on the first day of January, 201 D, and ending on the thirty-first day of December, 2010, the taxes on property in all the Magisterial Districts of the County of Chesterfield shall be as follows: Sec. 1. Real Property and Mobile Homes. (a) Except as provided in Sec. 1 (b), on tracts of land, lots or improvements thereon and on mobile homes the tax shall be $0.95 on every $100 of assessed value thereof. (b) On tracts of land, lots or improvements thereon and on mobile homes in the Charter Colony Powhite Parkway Transportation District the tax shall be $1.10 on every $100 of assessed value thereof. Sec. 2. Personal Property. (a) On automobiles, trailers, boats, boat trailers, other motor vehicles and on all tangible personal property used or held in connection with any mining, manufacturing or other business, trade, occupation or profession, including furnishings, furniture and appliances in rental units, the tax shall be $3.60 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (b) On aircraft as defined by Section 58.1-3503 and -3506 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $.50 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (c) On motor vehicles owned or leased by members of volunteer rescue squads, volunteer fire departments, volunteer police chaplains and by auxiliary police officers as provided in Section 9-57, Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, the tax shall be $.96 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (d) On wild or exotic animals as defined by Section 58.1-3506 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $0.01 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (e) On motor vehicles which use clean special fuels as defined in Section 58.1-2101 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $3.24 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. DRAFT 0425:83303.1 1 (~ ~ ~'~.'~. J (f) On motor vehicles, trailers, and semitrailers with a gross vehicle weight of 10,000 pounds or more used to transport property for hire by a motor carrier engaged in interstate commerce, the tax shall be $.96 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (g) On motor vehicles which are specially equipped to provide transportation for physically handicapped individuals, the tax shall be $.01 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. Sec. 3. Public Service Corporation Property. (a) On that portion of real estate and tangible personal property of public service corporations which has been equalized as provided in Section 58.1-2604 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $0.95 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof determined by the State Corporation Commission. (b) The foregoing subsections to the contrary notwithstanding, on automobiles and trucks belonging to such public service corporations the tax shall be $3.60 on every $100 of assessed value thereof. Sec. 4. Machinery and Tools. On machinery and tools used in a manufacturing or mining business the tax shall be $1.00 on every $100 assessed value thereof. DRAFT O~®~~~ 0425:83303.1 2 ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors LN:FY11_Tax 3-10, 17 1 col x 4.886 in. $223.69 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at an adjourned meeting on Wednesday, March 24, 2010 at 6:45 p.m. in the County Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield Administration Builwding, Route 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia, will hold a public heazing to consider: An ordinance to establish the annual tax levy on various classes of property for the County of Chesterfield A copy of the ordinance is on file in the County Administrator's office, Room 504, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield County, Virginia and may be examined by all interested persons between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. All persons wishing to present their views on this subject aze encouraged to call the Office of the Clerk to the Boazd of Supervisors at (804) 748-1200 to be placed on the speakers list, or may appeaz and sign up at 6 p.m. before the meeting. The hearing is held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons with disabilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakely, Clerk to the Board, at 748-1200. Persons needing interpreter services for the deaf must notify the Clerk 19, 2010. CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/10/2010 & 3/17/2010 Sworn to and subscribed before me this / ~~ day of 2010. Grooms Jr., Notary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) ~~' : ~ EXPIRES °, : ~ Q : ~ p2-29-}2 : . ~ ~ 110t09'~ a _ .. L. _.~Q`.V ARY THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 231 13 • Phone: (804) 545-7500 • Fax: (8tW) 714-3269 • Email: nrH~s(i~chestcrficldobserveecom • Internet: www.chts[erfieldobserveecom Legal Affiant ~ Public Hearing # 4 - 6:45 p.m. To Establish an Annual Tax Levy on Various Classes of Property for the County of Chesterfield THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO CONSIDER AN ANNUAL TAX LEVY ON VARIOUS CLASSES OF PROPERTY FOR THE COUNTY OF AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED E CHESTERFIELD SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAM IN THAT ORD ___ _ ER. TAX LEVY Number Name ' Organization _ 1 George Sproveri ~ r K d a 1 e. ______ _ 2 __ George Beadles 3 4 Pj;11 ~ ev -- r M ~ev rtitk.,ta ~ ~`s~ r;'c~ /~u~,t ~~s~ ~~'c-- 7 -~ G~v~~c~~~~~ ,~t5~~ ~~ _ 10 11 12 _ 13 - --- 14 15 16 __ 17 ---- 18' 19 -- ~~ 20 -- --- -- - 22 I __ - - - --- -- ----------- ----- --- 2 3 ~ 24' 25 --- .__ 26 - --- ' --------- 27 -- 28 - 29 _ -- 30 - 31 - - -- --- -- 32 , 33 !~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 16.E. Subiect: Public Hearing on the FY2011 Proposed Community Development Block Grant and the HOME Investment Partnership Annual Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Hold a Public Hearing on the FY2011 Proposed Community Development Block Grant and the HOME Investment Partnership Annual Plan Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on the FY2011 Proposed Community Development Block Grant and the HOME Investment Partnership Annual Plan. The FY2011 recommendation for this program totals $1,945,700 which is comprised of $1,255,800 in new CDBG allotments, $525,900 in new HOME Investment Partnership allotments, and $164,000 in Reprogrammed Funding. These allocations are contingent upon notification from HUD of an approved grant amount for FY2011. The County's Community Development Block Grant and HOME Annual Plan for FY2011 is required to be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by May 17, 2010. The submission must follow a required public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. A Review Committee has made its recommendation to the County Administrator. Attached are the recommendations from the Review Committee. The County Administrator will make final recommendations after receipt of funding notification from HUD. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Budget and Management ^ No oao11~ FY2011 Activi Proposed Bensley Community Center 49,300 Bensley Elementary Extended Day Program 12,500 CDBG Administration 251,200 Chalkley After School Program 6,000 Chesterfield Avenue Enhancement Project 100,000 Children's Home of Virginia Baptist 100,000 Communities In Schools-At Risk Youth Program 25,000 Emergency Home Repair-CDBG 48,000 Ettrick Community Center 55,500 Jefferson Davis Association Streetscape Improvement 187,200 Jefferson Davis Business Incubator-Biz Works 150,000 Laurel Road Drainage Project -Phase II 201,000 Phoenix Achievers Plus 20,000 Pro-Active Code Compliance 130,000 Small Women, Minority Business Technical Assistance 64,000 Youth Programs 20,000 Unallocated 100 Subtotal CDBG $1,419,800 Elder Homes Corp-Housing Rehabilitation 125,900 CDBG Housing Rehabilitation 142,000 HOME Administration 52,600 HOME Down Payment Assistance 50,000 Southside Development CHDC -CHDO 150,000 Unallocated 5,400 Subtotal HOME $525,900 Total $1,945,700 *County Administrator's recommendations pending receipt of FY2011 HUD grant amount. Public Hearing #5 - 7:00 p.m. Community Development Block Grant and Home Annual Financial Plan THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE COUNTY'S PROPOSED FY2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AND HOME ANNUAL FINANCIAL PLAN SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. CDBG Number Name ;Organization ___ 1 1 !Debra Girvin 'Communities in Schools 4'~~ Mike Polich ~ Southside Community Dev. & Housing Corp. 5 Connie Chamberlin HOME y 6 ~ George Beadles _ 7~ ~~+~~ WCIr-F' 8 ~ ~' I 1 4 ~ e v ~~, ~ ~, -~- Y ~ ~c~- 9'' 10' 11 12 _ 13I 14', 15' _ 16'~ ---- 17 181 19I _ 20'~ 22 ---------- 23 I _ 24 ~ __ _ 25' ----- 27' ----- 28 _ ._-- 29 30 31' _ 32I 33I -- -- -- - 34 ---- 35 ~ ---- -- --_--- 36' Ike brG ~~~,~„-~~, • S ~a Ke-r #~ I ~ k b 1-'L ~ ec~^'''~5 ~ 5 Chesterfield County Community Development Block Grant Talking Points re: Communities In Schools Board of Supervisors Wednesday, March 24, 2009 6:30 p.m. Public Meeting Room I am here this evening as the chair of the board of directors representing Communities In Schools of Chesterfield which has applied for block grant funds under the project priority: Support Programs that Enrich the Lives of Youth and Adults. (Opening statement) IMAGINE: Supporting a family of three on $18,310 or less a year. This amount is the federal poverty guideline for eligibility for students to receive free or reduced lunch rates. Or, can you imagine supporting a family of four on less than $22,050 per year? 73% of the students at Bellwood elementary, 64% at Chalkley, and 60% at Ettrick are eligible for these free or reduced lunch rates. These are the families that Communities In Schools serves. These at risk students and their families are among the most vulnerable citizens in our county. These are the students and families hit hardest in this economic downturn. Since 1994 Communities In Schools of Chesterfield has coordinated and delivered a wide variety of services for elementary students to promote their academic achievement. Afull-time site coordinator works at each school to coordinate resources and build positive relationships with students, parents, faculty, staff, and the community at large. A grant is requested to partially fund CIS programs at: ^ Bellwood ^ Chalkley and ^ Ettrick elementary schools. The premise of the model, based on research in successful prevention initiatives, is that if needs are addressed when children are young and families are linked to needed resources, there will be fewer dropouts in middle school and high school. Using this model, CIS provided services to more than 2500 students in 2009-2010. Nearly two hundred of these students had case managers who worked with them and their families to assess the nature and severity of their problems, identify programs and services to address their problems, and then monitored the student's progress and provided on-going intervention for those who remained at risk. During the 2009-10 school year: ^ 615 mentor volunteers developed relationships and contributed more than 6,821 hours of service working one-on-one with students. ^ These volunteers from businesses, civic organizations, educational institutions, and the faith community are instrumental in providing extra resources that the students would otherwise do without. ^ Students thrive with these extra services. CIS also coordinates extra health, mental health, and social support services. This year, for example, CIS coordinated the Give Kids a Smile initiative whereby local dentists screened 179 students for dental problems and then provided full-scale dental treatment including extractions, implants, and cleaning to those needing extra care ..all at NO COST. Requested grant funds also support Camp Adventure at Bellwood. This community service camp serves 35 rising 5th and 6th grade Bellwood students plus 10 Salem Church Middle School students who are camp veterans enroll in the camp learning and implementing leadership skills. Parent workshops are filled with activities and supplies needed to support learning at home in the areas of reading, math, homework skills, writing, and SOL test preparation. Average attendance at these workshops is more than 200 people. The YMCA of Greater Richmond partners with CIS: z ^ This past year the Bright Beginnings program provided more than 200 Bellwood, Chalkley, and Ettrick students with back-to-school clothing and school supplies. ^ In addition, last year 298 Bellwood, Chalkley, and Ettrick second grade students participated in free Learn to Swim lessons at the YMCA. ^ And more than 50 students received free camp scholarships. Working with the Midlothian Family YMCA, CIS coordinates free quality after-school childcare for up to 70 Bellwood students including transportation home from the program that runs throughout the school year (even when school is not in session.) This collaborative between the Y, CIS, Title I, and school received national recognition by the National School Boards Association as one of the top eight after school programs in the US. These are highlights of a few of the initiatives that CIS creates and implements to serve at risk students. Serving this vulnerable population, with these grant funds CIS will: ^ reduce student absenteeism ^ decrease office referrals ^ improve academic achievement, and ^ increase parental involvement We help students stay in school and make right choices by connecting them and their families with needed community resources. By bringing resources, services, parents, and volunteers into schools, we create a community of caring adults who work hand in hand with educators. Remember that family of four living on less than $22 050 per year? A block grant will support services and resources to enrich lives and help these students achieve both academically and socially. Thank you. cdbg2009-2020talkingpoints.grants.cd bg 3 ~< ~~e n ~GSle~y 5u~~,~~ea~ ~„~,~~~,~~ . ~~~ Remarks Addressine The RFP Fiscal Year 2010 - 2011 Housine Activities CDBG/Home Funds March 24, 2010 Census Tract -1007.02 Magisterial District-Matoaca Citywide Development Partners, Inc. A Non -Profit Organization 519 N 28th Street Richmond, Virginia 23223 (804) 225-0558 e-mail - cwdp@comcast.net Karen Easley CEO (804) 225-0558 Citywide Development Partners, Inc. A home or every heart To ]amen ]. L. Stegmaier, and the elected members of the Board of Supervisors, Citywide Development Partners, Inc. (CWDP) recently submitted a proposal for CDBG/HOME funds to build single family housing for families in the 60-80% AMI range. Unlike other submissions, CWDP would be able to accomplish this goal for a fraction of the cost of Chesterfield County's current CHDO. Our homes would be comparable if not surpassing in square footage, amenities, and quality of building materials as those of your current CHDO but at a far lower sales price. This fact was stated in our RFP. CWDP has a track record of going head to head with your CHDO in the City of Richmond, and without utilizing any government grants to build or obtain lots and beat them on price and amenities every time. Our plan would offer homes for sale between 150,000 and 180,000, which is less than the price range of homes currently being built with CDBG/HOME money. Your CHDO homes in Chesterfield are currently listed for 189,000-220,000. Homes in this price range can already be found in many new subdivisions in your county. The grant funding already in use has not lowered the price of the CHDO home. In most cases other government funded down payment assistance programs must be utilized by the homebuyer, that fall into the 60 - 80% AMI, to qualify for a mortgage on a CHDO home. Is this really the best and most economical use of CDBG/HOME funds? Our home price would allow people who fall within the 60 - 80% AMI range to purchase a home if there were NOgrant funds available of any kind to assist with closing or down payment costs. As it stands now, with funding available for closing/down payment assistance, it can be assumed that someone is making an astounding profit on the backs of taxpayers and homebuyers. To date, your CHDO or your CHDO's builder, has added an approximate 60% profit margin into the price of their 190K homes. This is an outrage. CWDP's business plan differs in that we require our partners to hold a financial stake in our projects; this insures accountability and ultimately affordability for the potential homebuyer. An affordable home is not set at a price that the market can bear, but instead is determined by what a potential homebuyer can afford. PO Box 634 Richmond, VA 23218 (P) 804.225.0558 • (F) 804.562.4281 To stay viable in this economic climate, everyone has had to change their method of business operations to survive. The current economic challenges that Chesterfield County is now facing exemplifies how the government must also change. It is discouraging to see the county continue business as usual with its CDBG/HOME funds set aside for new home construction. CWDP has offered Chesterfield an opportunity that benefits its citizens by turning renters, including employed or otherwise eligible voucher recipients, into homeowners. This will obviously increase the county tax base. On an even more positive note to the coffers of Chesterfield County, CWDP will be returning a large portion of the grant money back over to the county through proffers and water and sewer hookup fees. Based on a telephone conversation between me and Thomas Taylor, and an a-mail we received from Robbie Campbell, it is evident that our proposal was not read, analyzed nor weighed evenly against other RFP's. It is incomprehensible that the county does not wish to do business more economically by partnering in this manner with a not for profit who has outlined an exemplary plan to maximize and be good stewards of Chesterfield County's financial resources. We realize our project will not solve the county's problem of affordable housing; we can be a more efficient part of the solution. We would be ecstatic and grateful to accept funding towards one lot in order to build our resume with Chesterfield County. We are excited about the possibility of working with Chesterfield County, and urge you to reassess our RFP. I thank you in advance for your time to reconsider. Please contact me with any questions. Sin erely, ~~~.52~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 16.F. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the FY2011-2015 Proposed Capital Improvement Program County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a Public Hearing to Consider the FY2011-2015 Proposed Capital Improvement Program. Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on the County Administrator's Proposed five-year Capital Improvement Program for FY2011- 2015 which totals $456,769,700 for County, Schools and Utility projects as follows: General County Projects $157,318,800 General County Road Projects 16,620,200 Total General County Projects $173,939,000 School Projects 136,093,700 Utility Projects 146,737,000 Total $456,769,700 Attached are copies of the summary schedules for the County, Schools, and Utilities. Additional detail is available in the CIP document. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # 5~ I~ ^~ 1~1 FBI V z O V ~„~ .~i O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O F O N ~n 7 ~ N O~ O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O ~ oo ~ ~ oo ~ M O O O O vi n v'1 n O 7 O ~ O vi N ~i N O O O v'i N V7 ~ O 1n M M ~ ,-. r. .r .-. ~ O ~ O ~ N ~ ~ nj N ~ 69 H9 .~- i 69 ~ 6q .-. b9 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 O 0 N O 69 O bfi 0 0 b9 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O O O O N M O O O O O [~ O N O O N ~ v'~ Vl N O~ ~O b9 69 ~--~ M 1f1 69 (A ~ O O O O O N O O 69 O d9 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O ~ N S O ~ O O O O ,,, ~ ~ O~ O O ~ n N 00 M O O O O ~ O ~ h ~ .i f/9 m Q G •n° M `~ O O O O O O O O O O O 69 O fiR 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O ~ 'n N 0 7 N 0 ~D O O O O O O O b9 O O C ~ O ct [~ N eF ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0 0 o U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ '~ v v N O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O W N ON 7 O N OOOn b9 d9 69 C O O O O ~ O ~ ~" GL ~ ~ 000 ~ O n O N O O ~ ~ ~O O 7 M ~D N '""' ~ N O iA 513 . . w 69 ~ p Pr O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ O U ~ O S D O O N 0 0^ O O V ~ N O~ O N M O O G4 ~ O~ ~ ~ 00 O O rr N ~ M v N ~O ~-: ~--~ r-i 6A d4 _ ~ 69 C ~ ~ ai O I"" i° V U •~ U . v ,~ ~ y ~ ~ '`~ Cz. v ,..~ w ~ a ~..i V N W ~ w .o w ~ ~ a 0o w C7 ~ o ~ '~ C c ~ °~ ~ `. a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ v a b v C .~ _ w ` C ~ b4 c ~ ~ C7 ~ " ~ v ~; C / ~ ~ Q • . L • ce c a L ~ ~ . ~ ~~e ~ b ~ ~" L i . + a Q ~ W ~ O ce w n ~' a~ ~ ~ ,Q cbo ~ i1. p m ~' ~ iU. 4ai ~ ~ Y ~" ~ w w 7 U w ~ w .r .C aS OJ .U` N ~ ~ V] a. V1 b0 ca r., , V p "d O O Z ~ O ~ ,~, w 3 ~ C7 D O U O ~ = F~ F .a Q U w ..a O a a ~ 3 F ~ Q v b ~? .~ ~ F ~ Q W G7 a " ,~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ V O V ,.a ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c F o N 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 0 c O O O O vi v'i O 0 0 ~ C O ~"~ O O l~ V1 ~p M O~ ~O O ~O O E.r M ~O M N M ~ [~ V'1 00 ~ N 6A ^~ ~ ^~ M M N ~' GTi ~ O O O O O O O O O O O .r 0 N O 0 0 ~ O O N G ~ O ~ ~ ~ 7r N O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O N O O N O O Gir ~ O oo O 00 M O O O O O O O O O O O .~-i N O O O O N O O ~ ~ 0 ~ O O G7^ N N O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 N O 0 0 O O O O ~ i ~ O O O f o o O .. `~ ° ° ° o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N , ~ ~ ~ ~ O . -i ~ M 7 °o I o° ,~ r. O ~ 609 ~O N M EI4 O O O N ~--i ..r O ~ 6A 69 69 O ~ b0r9 0 6A 0 vj ~ ~ w c G .C ~ ~ C ro U ~ ~ ~ Ri v • ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ,-, Q > _ Q .-. ~ rx ^ w ~ ~ ~ w C7 ~0 0 C7 w 8 w C7 `' ~° °' ~ „ 'S c .. .r ~ ,~, v w ~ 3 C7 '•' oq o CG .~~ ~ a~ c ~ ~ ° a ro ~ i '~ ~ •~ ^ a : ~ on c ~ " U ~ w' Y o°' ^ o ~° °' y E ~ ° .ri ~ ~ '~ N 'V ~ ~ C ~ U ~ W ~ •~ [ Q rx E= ~ w _ •c ~ ~ ~ Q V C fti U ~ ~ ~ . i O o u ~ O C ~, a CC i y Y ~ , ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4-i ~ a ~> ° b c0 ~, o a~ O Y ~ „ ''' C ~ •U w O a~ ~ o C y ~ s . w c0 .~ ~q •- ~ •cd ~ cC w O rx ~ o .~ ~ O ~ o ~ _ q U D w ° ~? ° a es C u. w ~ a~ a F - O F V L U Y a~ rti .~ N U ~ •~ C n. ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ o V1 y ~ x CQ Y ~ ~ F ~ ° ° o o o o ~ o v ice o o r i ~ , M O M ~ O O v i N ~ + . -~ ,-. 00 .--i ~ n j M 69 tsi 06A O 00 O O O O O O O O O O an O O ~ O ~ O N ~ M O O ~ p y~q "~ N O 6A p° 0 b O ~ O 0 0 00 0 00 p D O ~A rr ~ ~ 000 U O ~ ~ °: N 6A ~D O~ 00 w ~ ~ . 69 ~ '~ v b v O O O O O O w O O O O O O y ~j ~ M O M ~ ~ O O oo ~ O vi '~ ' M 69 w a " a x 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 u ~ O O U O O ~ ~ G (7 G N ~. C~ ^ t , ! b ~ w . p -a a ~3 ~ ~ O ^ ~ ~ U ` C 7 ~ : ~ . ~ o ,^ .. a~i U ~; O ~ o ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ m ~ b 4 ~ w ~ a ~. U ~ Ca °~ ~ ' ~ ~ , " b ~ ~ ~ R b ~' ~ ~ a ~ iii ~ _~ ~ ~ a o U a ~ ~ ~ ¢ z o a. ¢ Y 0 m ~ ~ •~ C ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ O V y ., ~ h ~ •`n ~ O ~ :3 M O N 7 ~ '~ a i ~o ~ `' ~ ~ ~ ~ .o ~ 7 :r ~ as 0 U U ..a Q .a ~ ~ F ~ C~ d .~ ~ "' ~ .c w cn I~ qq r~ 1~ ^~ h~ 1~1 V O V „~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -~ 0 o 0 o 0 ~ 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 o 0 er 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 l~ l~ O M O O v'i ~ ~ O l~ .~ O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O ~o N ^'~ [r ~n O r'^ M ~ l~ O ~n N O ~--~ oo 00 N 00 O ~ N 00 O ~O M ^~ O 00 O V1 N ~O Q\ O O ~ O N O ~ ~ O O O ~ C ~ ~ 00 O 00 ~ .-y 00 N 00 N .-- ~ N ri .-. pp ~ .-. ~p .-. N 7 -~ l~ ~ b19 ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C N ~ O O O O O ^' O O O ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O ~ (i" O ~ O N O O O O M O 0 O im' O O O ~ O ~ O O O O O O I~ ~ ^' 0 0 V ) M ~ ~ ~ ~ .--i M big ~ ~ '~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O " N 69 O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O~ O O O O O O^ O O O ~1 O O O O O O O O >,,, ~ ~t M O ~ O N O Vl O 1n O 00 O V1 O Q\ ~ N O O N 00 O O O O O O vi M p ~ ^' O\ M N N 1I^ 00 00 7 01 O ~' '1:' .-r ~ ~ ~ O Q M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .~ ~ 69 O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O l~ O O O O O O O N b9 O v1 O O O O O ~O ~ N ~" G4 O [~ O ~ O N O ~ O~ ~ O O N N O O O ~ v7 ~ h Q~ l~ ~O O O O O O ~O o U O ~--~ N v~ ~ vl I~ N 01 v~ ~ O~ ~O y ^'~ .'" 7 bR N m ~ .~. M b 4 ~"~ '~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O / kl " N O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O ~ 69 O O O ~ O O O O i. y .J ~ O ~n N ~n M ~ 7 O~ N O O O ~ ~ ^' ""' ~ N N O^ v1 O\ 7 00 vi fA ~ ~ O x y ~ ~ O O O ~ 0 0 o O O 0 O O O O O o 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 U C 0 0 0 0 0 O O ~ 0 0 O O U ,, ~ O ~ O N o0 ~ 0o N O N ~O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ O v 0 0~ ~ "' ^' M bH 7 cR U ~ ~ U C7 ~, ~ c.: v ~ ~ O v V U ~. v w v w w ~ w ~ ~, 7 c C7 c7 `~ c 7 a ,-. ~ `. c ~ .. w O ~+ y ~ ~ w ~ Q~ on O ^ ~ a O o ~ U r U LL a. `a w d •~ ~ « ~ E w; i ~ v ^ W y ~ cy ~ . u. V ~ ~ o. ~ O C7 0 6L~ C7 C4 ~ ~ .-. ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ?~ ~ O `-' co ° w ~ O ~ ~ d ~ ,~ A. v, ° ' C o ~ v .~E c`d C 7 ... ~ Q G C7 C 7 O ~~' ~.: y C ~ ~ ~ `~ o ~ ^o U ~ n ca ~ ^ w noitlo . °"'' ~ ~ ~', Q w a ~ v a. W C7 C7 .~ ''a ~ ~' v ~ ~ b 7 c ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ U ~ ~; `. E ~ ~ w ~ w C a~ U ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ N • O ^~ ~ C ~ V y • C .~E cd c C , ~ ~ '~ O ~ f 0. .C ~ ~ ~ c C ~ v x y ~ .~' U o ~ ° a •p Q. Q, a i 'a '"3 ~ R. C7 'L ~ ~ °" ~ x 3 ~ U a ,~ 'a ~, ~ ~ ~ ' ¢ ~ 3 E ~ y o Y o ~ a i v ~ x a i ~ a - ~ H T .. ~ i ~ W fx ~ O U V ~ x cis 0. C ~ ~p ~ O ~ vi C> O ~ 'O^ .D Q O ~ v D ~ Q ~ O O O ~ ~ ' , ~ ~ v . . U U Q G1. w cd cs. CC w x ~ ~ CQ a cC a cO a O a U rn O ~ O F• • , `p ~ ¢ O U ~ L ~ x O ~ O ~ ~ ~ , 3 M w . z a ? 0. p„ a w w ~ Q~ ~~ b a w a" G m 0 N 53 .a S1. b W a V z O V ,.~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 0 0 0 O =~ ~ O ~ O ~ E., c ~ o v; ~ ~ , GTi ~ O O O O O ~ O N O O ,„ i O O ~ ~T O N M + O h N N 511 ~ O O O O O ~ O O FT' N 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O ~ O ~ ~ N ~ ~ ,-. \O ~ O O O O ~ O ~ O ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O N N O O O Vl O 1n O O O O O O~ ~ CT ~ O O~ O ~O O ~O N M ~ ~ a, ~ ~o o v ~n ~ ~o a; I~ O ~ -~ N 00 \p ~ 5A rr 511 O O O O O X 0 ~ 0 O O O O O O O N N N O O ~ ~ O~ O O O O O O X 0 O 0 O O O O O ~O O O O O O O fA M fA °0 0 0 00 O O O 00 s°s oo °o O O o O M V1 O O O O O O O O OOi O M V1 ~ 6A r, rl 511 .~r ~ O 00 O N O ,,n C ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O vi O O O ~ O ~ ~ ~ fi ~~ . . _ C7 ~ U w ~ y ~ a~ M cva T w w aai cn ,s V ~ ~ a. .-. .~. o ~ y w '- p T ~ w a~~i ~ ~ cn ~ c ~ ~ ~ 's ° E o o °' u ~ ~ ~ ~ G. ~ D ' ~ ~ ~ is ~ .p.~ C •Y ~ '1" ~ T 4r ~ ~ .~' O OD 4, ~ CL ri1 0 0 '~. U ° °' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ U w C7 E~ F p. F i09 O O O O O O O M V1 O O O O O O O O ~ O O N v1 69 3 0 tin rx a`'""i o ~'i U ~ w v ~ ... y ~ o ~' U .O .y w ~ F, ' Q. p ~ ~ 0. ~ ~ U Q ~ ~ .~ C ~ cvi ~ dpp +r w ¢ 'fl C ~ ~ ~ ~ ° rx 'Y w a a o b o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F^ O O 00 M N N 511 n~ r J d .~ C O Q O •n .n V w b v w v vi v O F. ~, x U U v 7 C7 . . ti v a a d 0 m 0 .~ 0~0 o ~ v v ~ ~ w ~ ~ G •• ~ o '[$ G N w ~3 ~ cPi v c v C7 w v w w C7 v'Gi ~~O~r~~ ,.a in o 0 0 0 000000 000 000 0000 0000 0 Q .~ o o 0 ~ 0 o 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O n ~ ^ 000000 0 0 0 0 0 000 000 0000 -••~o t~ 0 N ~ O M O 0 O O O O O H O O O O n O M ti ~ v1 .-. ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O Vl v1 O O O O 0 0 --~ O v1 O O ' N O O~ .~ N O ~ ~ O O O ~ O ~--~ V ^ N [~ O M~ O O ~ Q~ [ ~D v7 M vi [ ~ M 4 N ~--~ O~ ~O N ~O .~ ,-: N o0 N v1 ~G ~ ~ 6 .-. N r. .-. r. M W fR N~ I~ 5~ F TT~~ V1 a H U O O 1n 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ,,,~ O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O ~ 0 ~ M O O O O M O O O O M ~ ~ O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v1 ~° v~ ~n O ~n ~O G7i ~t v7 ~ 7 ~ Vl O N 7 N N O N ~ ~ ~ ,_„ N ~ 7 ~ ..: r. ~ M N bA ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O '~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ C O O O O O O 00 O O O ~O O ~ N M O O O O O O vi O O O [~ O M ,}~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O V1 ~ Vl V1 O Vl V1 O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V1 v1 v1 O O l~ et N N O O N 1n ~ .--. ~ ~ ri r. ,-• 7 N M d9 ~ yj M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ 0 0 0 O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O V~ O O O v~ O O O O 0 0 ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ O O O --~ O O O O ' -~ O N 00 N M ~ ~ ~ M ~ V 1 O O '•~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O 7 N N O ~ ~ O 00 r 64 M ~ ~ N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O '~ O O O O 69 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O p M ~ O ~D O O O O 00 O 7 N ~'^ ~ .-: ~ N O O ~ O O O O N O N 00 ~ N ~ ~ N O~ ~ r N O r 69 N ~ "" ~ C GTw o 0~0 7 C O l~ ~ ~ M O ~ ~ bR i N ~ U ~ F" on c ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ i~.w ~ ~ o a s ~ O a F O U Q U F i O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ff3 ~ O O O ~ O O ~ O ~ ~ M ~ N O N O 1 h ~O M 7 M pp .~-i W3 vi .T+ t ~ y U ~ ~ ~ O° ~ ~ ' U ~ N ~ C ^ ~ ~ C •O ~ ~ y +, ~' ~ •°v a` W c 'L' f o x ~~ Q c~ ~ °' ~, o o ~ ~ a~i ~ y b • o ~ ~ o b a~ ~ x a~i ~ a~'i c~a a~i ~ `-U° • p v~ a °' " W °' °' ¢ > x °_° ¢ > ~ rn °_ ~ o, c ou c ° Q. a¢i o`. L W :~w~7x~3w:Y~'~'N•w~:c °' owv~x~ ~ ~ ° ~ O b b b -~a ~ •~ .~ F~ U F-~ ~ F yl Q Q Q Q Li ~ f--' CL~ ®~®~l?4 d~ o 0 e 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~n ~n O ~i O O~ O O O O O ~--~ O O O 0 O v O O O O ~O o0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 vi 0 O 0 O o O\ v~ 7 ~ 7 ~ [~ O ~ ~ 0 i •-• ,-• v~ •-• O ~D •-• N O O M O vl O h O ~ M Q~ O ~n O N M ~O vi Q~ 00 ~O 1-• •-• yj M ~ M .r N M ~ ~p ~ GL V9 ~ Ni 69 69 ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O ~ O O ~n O O O O O e h ~ h ~ ~ O~ O vi O\ [~ 00 00 00 00 .-. 00 [~ 69 fR ~"~ fig 69 ~--~ Hi ~ .ti O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O 'y w O ~ O ~ O o O 0 O o O v~ p O O C e ~ ~ a o v~ a o 0 N 0 00 0 ,~ n O ._. a 6 q ~ N (R si 69 rf O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O l O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O ~ b O O O O O ~ O O ~ ~ ~ O O O vl O N ~D v1 O O ~ ~ N N N N •--~ vl ~ 00 O l~ ~p N h ~O ,_, ~O 69 19 fi N 69 69 69 O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O ~ O O O O O O O O O ,+ O O O O O O w 7 ~ O O ~ O 7 M .~-i .~i ^ 00 M N ~ ~ M f ~j ~ 69 H9 . i fA . -i 69 '~ C O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V1 o O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O v1 v~ N N O ~ O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ N N O O O M O N M ~ M R M N ~ ~ p" U ~ ~ ~ H F' ~ o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a~ O O W ~ O ~ ~ O O 7 O HL Z 6 ~ O ~ h 7 ~--~ .~. M n h v'1 N l~ O L M M ~--~ ~ O ~--i ~ y j L .--i O~ ~ 'M1p i M O ('~ (.J O U' O (~ O O O O O O C7 (' ') O O O O O .0 y Vi z ~ O O ~-+ O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ . ~ O O O O O O O O O O ~ y O O '~ O O O '~'~ O O O M O O O N vi h O O l ~. O C7 C7 ~ C7 p C7 00 ~. ~ n ~ ~ C 7 C7 , ~-. N M O O w V 7. ,Z z "" z , .-. vj M . ~ O O ~ N W O O O O O O W ~ W CG CL ~ W ~ W fY~ ~ ~ 4L~ W ~ fx W ~ W W 0. F i m a c a=i ~ a G o ~ _ ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ , c o a ~ ~ e c c ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ a ~ a a ~ o n `3 3 0 ~ x a ~ ~ 3 ~ .s .~ ~ ~ x ;~ 3 H 3 ~ ~ ? ~~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 W ~ ~ a G ~ ~ i cd ~ 3 ~ O ~ v v L ~° w c ~ ~ ¢. 2 ~ `tl rn d ~ eo U 3 ~. ~ .. ~ W F" z Q ' v ~ a c CG o '. ;, o W ~ ° ~ ° ~ d w ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~° ~ ~ = ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ U ~ .~ W w ~ ~ ~ a ~ o o ~cd x ~ ~ ~ .°,, .~ v °~' .a W ~ ~ ~ F C o o ~ = °q a > m R ~ v ~ c F-' U U W x W x x x , :L' ~ ~ z Z ~a Or ~ ~ 4 ' ~ o 3 ~ F" II II O O ~„ L L L ~ O W f~ ~n F a F., .a ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0o a rn .. [..I ~"'~ rn O ~ O o M 0 M 0 M ~ o O~ 0 M 0 O ~ 00 a O ~ O\ N ~ ~ M w "' ~ ~ Vi ' ^ Yi sA ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O "" O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O vi vi ~ ~ ~ O O O ~ O O ~ ~ ~ O O O O 6A O 69 ~ 619 d9 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O "" N O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I ~ O O O O O O O O O v'i vi W ~ ~ O O O v'1 N O 1n ~O ~ [~ V O .Oi O O 69 O 69 Y3 Yf 69 M O O O O O O O O O O O O O . r N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O l >„ O O O O O O O O O vi ~n ~ ~ ~ O O O v1 N O ~ ~ ~ O O O O ~ O fA Y3 fig 69 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O ~ O ~ O O O O O O A/ W N N N O N ON W ~O ~O .~ O ~O ~O ~ ~O 6A fi5 6A 69 O O O O C O O O O O O ~/ O NI O O O O O O O Fil GT T ~ O O~0 ~ 7 ~ F" ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~, ~+ W ~ o o 0 0 0 ~ o i I~ ~ ~ L .O v1 O 7 N ~ M v n v1 v1 ~ l~ Vi ~ M O O~ O O O Q\ Vl t~ O L III/// •L (V vl M F4 O L Q 0 o ~ al 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ~ " W 0 0 0 0 0 0 W ~~"„ W CG ~ ~ fx f~ ~ F W O t/~ n. O ~ ~' w ~ w U `n O F v a 0, ~ y W c w c v ~ d ~ ~ G w ~ v o v Ca c ~ w '° w ~ ~ e° x ~ y °' ~ = :° rx ~ ° ~ z w ~ 0 ~ Q ~ ~ 3 U ~° ~, a a ~, ~n " ; °' ~°' a w ~" 3 w 3 ~ Fr z ~ a w Z w w s x ~~R7~_~~ Public Hearing # 6 - 7:15 p.m. To Consider FY2011-2016 Capital Improvement Program THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FY2011-FY2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. CIP __ Number Name !Organization I 1 Brenda Stewart ' 2 Heather Hart 3 George Beadles 5 ' Viv~~r, u~ ass ---------------- ,, -- h ------- 6 7 8 ' -- 9 ' 10' 11 12 - 13 -------- -- - 14 I 15 I - 16 - -- - -- 17 --- - 18 ~, 19 ---- 20 _ ---- - 21 _-- 22 23 24, 25 26 27 __ 28' _ ~ 29 30 31 __ ___ 32 _ 33' 34'~ 35 ~e~~,~~ N~~~- ~,~ h 1 c I-~ e ~~ ~ -~~ ~- ~ S(~eal~er ~a Chairman Gecker, Board and Mr. Stegmaier, I am speaking on behalf of CURG-Citizens United for Responsible Government. As you know, we have been following the School Board's budget process starting with the CIP. We again thank this Board for asking questions of the School Board concerning expenditures. Even with the removal and deferral of some of the CIP items, there continues to be renovations in the CIP that we feel are questionable. • $12M renovations to Midlothian HS (FY2013). This school is currently at 87% capacity. The renovations include a new gym, expanded band room, and increased size of main office including guidance. This high school already has a gym and an auxiliary gym. The gym proposed is to be a 3 full basketball court size gym. Why are there expansions and additions for a school that is nowhere near capacity? • $9M for a HVAC system for the old Clover Hill HS building (FY2013). There are not definite plans for the use of this building. • Renovations at Harrowgate and Enon Elementary Schools with the addition of more seats when these schools are at 84°~ and 83% capacity respectively. Each of these projects will cost $5M between FY2014 and FY2015. • $1M for renovations to Monacan HS in FY2014 while this school is at 86% capacity. These are just a sample of some of the planned renovations or additions in the CIP for FY2011-FY2015. Bonds have to be sold to fund these projects and then repaid out of the operating budget that is already difficult to manage. Every project should be looked at to determine if every aspect of each project is still needed. We understand that the School CIP is renewed each year but as a Board you have to vote on the whole CIP FY2011-2015. CURG also continues to be concerned that the majority of budget cuts are coming from the classroom. By increasing student-teacher ratio by 1 and eliminating 50 instructional assistants this decreases the support that a student can receive in the classroom. By closing Perrymont MS, how will these students be able to receive the instruction that they need with increased class sizes and decreased support staff? With these reductions we are asking our teachers to do more for less pay. To have a successful school system we need to have quality teachers in the classroom. We don't believe that Chesterfield County will continue to recruit the best teachers and staff or maintain current teachers and staff due to the pay cuts approved by the School Board. Central Office has increased staff by 40-50 positions over the last 4 years. This area is only reducing 9 positions in FY2011. We understand how difficult and trying these decisions are for you as a Board and we appreciate you taking the time to hear our concerns. We look forward to working with you during this process and we hope that the focus is on the students when addressing cuts to the school budget. Thank you for your time. Heather Hart Citizens United for Responsible Government 10901 Old Cheshire Lane Chester, VA 23831 804-768-8682 hartx6@comcast.net CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~.. Meeting Date: March 24, 2010 Item Number: 16.G. Subject: Public Hearing on FY2011 Proposed Financial Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action ReQUested: Hold a Public Hearing on the FY2011 Biennial Financial Plan Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on the County Administrator's FY2011 Proposed Financial Plan, which totals $1,121,403,200. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director. Budget and Mana ement ^ No # rir ~.~II~~ Your Cnmmunit ~ News a er Since 1995 PP P.O. Box 1.616,.Midlothian, Virginia 231.13 • Phone: (8O•1) 545-7500 • Fax: (8(k1) 744-3269 • Email: news@chestertieldobserver.com • Internet: www.chesterfieldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue Chesterfield County FY2011 Proposed Budget 2 Full Pages $1400.00 Budget Office The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/17/2010 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ ~ ~ day of ATTACH ,' lQ~`~ , 2010. AD HERE /~ Legal Affiant J T, Grooms Jr., N Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) sa.: © T ~~\``\` ~••~W FAQ O~d' ~~~i ~ :" m2-29-1t i . • • ~ :i112C93 4~7p A•.... •• 0 ~~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU.' ~ s ~~ 1~ March 17, 2010 www.chesterfieltlobservercom CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRIGNIA Proposed Budget For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2011 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY TAX RATES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2010 The Boazd of Supervisors of Chesterfield Counrywill on Wednesday, March 24, 2010 at 6:45 p.m. the Public Meeting Roam Chesterfield Cowry The public hearing will be open to the public. The Board o(Supervisors will ermit d i i b h d with disabilities. My persons with questions on the accessibility of the ia- , Administration BuBding, Route 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfield County, Vi i i h ld p person es r ng to e ear an oppormnhy to present oral or writ- ten testimony Those desiring to be heard are encouraged to call the Office c Iity or the need for re Doable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley Clerk to the Board at (R04) 74R-1200 P d ~ rg n a o a public heazing to consider the appropriate tax levy on real state, ~ rrsonal prop rty. chmery and tools and air lanes for the tax of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors at (804) 748-1200 to be placed on th s k B , , ersons Her ing nterp eter services for the deaf must notity the Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, , p yyreaa** 2010. Ilse Board of Srryervisors may, ar the conclusion of the public ~ e pea ers st or may appeaz and sign up at 6:15 p.m. before the meeting. March 19, 2010. heartrt g, adioum to meet and fix such tax rates at a subsequent meeting. The hearing u held at a public facility designed to be accessible to persons - Persona] Tangible Property Property for Motor Vehicles, Personal (excluding automobiles Personal Proprrrv Personal Personal Personal Trailers 8; Property S i T d and trucks)and em - ra ers for (amomobiles Property Property Property for Personal witha Gross Specially Real Estate for and Hocks) of for Rescue for Wild or Vehides Us- Property far Weight of Personal Equipped Public Service Personal Public Servis Squad Exotic ing Clean 8c Machinery Rr 10 00016s Pro ert for M t Real Estate Corporations Property Corporations Volunteers Mimals Special Fuels Too , . p y o or ls or more Ai ft V hi l 2009 rcra e c es General Fund Levy 50.95 $0.95 33.60 $3.60 $0.96 50.01 $3.24 51.00 $0.96 50.50 $0.01 2010 General Fund Levy 50.95 - $0.95 43.60 53.60 $0.96 50.01 $3.24 51.00 $0.96 50.50 $0.01 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2011 -fhe Board of $upernsors of Chester- field County sill hold a public hearing on Wednesday, March 29, 2010, at 7:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Aoom, Chesterfield County Adminisvaion Building, Rome 10 and Lori Road, Chesterfeld, Vtrginia lur informative and fiscal planning purposes to consider the County Adm"udstralor's Proposed Community Development Hlock Grant and Home Investment Partnership funds fur the fiscal reaz 2011 program as re<onunende3 by We County Adndnistra- tor. Funding for the fiscal year 2011 pro- gram is projected to be 31.945,700. The hearing will be open to the public. The Board f Sup vi ors will permit p ons desiring to be heard an opportunity to pres- ent oral or written testimony Those esir- ingg to be heard are encouraged to call the Office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervi- sors at (809) 748-1200 to be placed on the COM.MUIs'ITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT Bensley Community Center Bensley Elementary Extended Day Program CDBG Administration Chalk)ey After School Program Chesterfield Avenue Enhancement Project Children's Home of Vie~rria Baptist Communities In Schools-At Risk Youth Program Emergency Home Repay-CDBG Ettri Community Center Jefferson Davis Association Streetscape Improvemrnt Jefferson Davis Business Incubator-Biz Works Laurel Road D~amege Project -Phase D Phoenix Achievers Plus Pro-Active Code CompBance Small Womrn, Minority Rosiness Technical Assistance Youth Programs Unallocated Submtal CDBG speakers list, or may appear and sign up at for reasonable acwmmodations should 6a p.m. before the meeting. contact ]anice Blaldey Clerk to the Roard, at 1804) 743-1200. Persons needing mter- The hearing is held at a public facility de- preter services for the deaf must notity the "fined to be accessible to persons whh dis- Clerk to the Board no later than Friday, abilities. Any persons with questions on March 19, 2010 the accessibility of the facility or the need 2011 Proposed Exornditures• 99.300 12,500 251,200 6,000 100.000 ]00,000 25,000 48,000 55,500 187,200 150,000 201,000 20,000 130,000 64.000 20,000 100 19,800 Elder Homes Carp-Housing Rehabilitation 125,900 CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Igl,pOp HOME Administration 52,600 HOME Down Payment Assistance 50,000 Southside Development CHDC -CHDO 150,000 Unallocated 5,q~ $ubtoml HOME 5525,900 Total 51,945,700 'County Administrator's recommendations pending receipt of FY201 ]HUD grant amount. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2011-2015 'Ihe Board f Supervisors of Chester- Bald Cowry will hold a pub& hearing on The public hearing is held pursuant to Sec- The hearing is held at a pubBi facility de- non 5.4 of the County Charter allowing the signed to be accessible to ersons with ilia- The County Admuusvator's recommended CIP i d d bB Wednesday, March 24, 2010, at 7:15 p. th P bB M ti R Ch p public to q esfion and comment on the abilities. My persons with questions on s prepare an pu shed for infor- nation and planning purposes only and is e u < ee ng oom, esterfield Cotmt Ad ild i i t ti B R ] proposed CIP. The Boazd of Suppervisors the acceuibility of the facility ar the need available for public review in the County srs~, y m n s ra on u ome 0 and Lori Road Cheaterfied Virginia f will permit persons desiring to be heard for reasonable accommodation should an o ortuni to resent l itt Administrators OBrce, via Internet at www. , ig p tsr poses nu M o ins d pl~ pp ty p ora or wr en cormct Janice Blakley. Clerk to the Boazd, testimony. Those desiring to be heard are at (804) 798-1200. Persons needing inter- chestefidd.gov, and in all County public libraries. The inclnion of a project or proj- ' rr 11 ~ n i er the Coun ty t is encouraged to call tie Oil ce of tie Clerk to preter services for the deaf mot notify the acts does not constitute a commitment or Proposed Capital hnprovement Program (CBs) for final ears 2011-2015 which to the Board of Supervisors at (804) 748-1200 Clerk to the Boazd no later than Friday, t b l d h obligation on the part of the Boazd of Su- y - tats 4456,769,700. o ace e p on t e speakers RsL or may March 19, 2010. appear and sign up az 6:15 p.m. before the ors of Chesterfield Coun to A o r o meeting. rista any funds for that project r pu p se. There is no designation or allocation of avy CIP funds for any purpose until there has been an appropriation for that purpose by the Boazd of Supervisors. The CIP public heazing is for informative and planrting purposes and will not be approved, adopted or ratified by the Board of Supervisors at this public hearing. Addenda to the Pro- posed ClPs are available by concocting the Budget and Management 01Hce at (804) 748-1598. srww.chesteAieldobservercom ~ March 17, 2010 Chesterfieal o~$Qrye~ 17 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2011 - 2015 UPITAl IJIPROVEMEhT PROGRAhf GENERALFWi DPROIECFS Engmraing e7enrral Services Health and Social Srrvi<zs Idbrar Parks send Recreation Public 6afety Technology Improvements Transportation TOTAL GENERAL FUND PROIECTS 7ond FY2011-F7'2015 Proposed SILGSF: General Fwtd and Reserves Translrr 73,;;8.;00 304000 General Obligation or Other Debt Financing 85456,{UO 1,600,000 Other Soarers 2,515400 29,609,600 Cash Proffers 1' M18 900 {,309,1 D0 TOTAL GENERAL FUND SOURCES $173,939,000 35,186.300 18,107,800 SCHOOLS 17,511,000 L/StS' 10,695,000 Projects 136,093 700 16,620400 TOTAL SCHOOLS PROJECTS $136,093,700 $173,939,000 ~4lliLrs Grneral ObliganoNDebt Financing 9(1,567; 00 Capital Projects Reserve Transhr 32,420,OW Cash Froffrrs ^.1ObAO0 TOTAL SCHOOL SOURCES $I 16,093,700 UTTLITIES PROJECTS Uses: Water 9?,639,000 Wastewater "4,098,000 TOTAL UTILITIES PROJECTS 146~737,W0 $ourcef Transfer from Operating Funds/Roods 146,731,000 TOTAL UTILITES SOURCES ~ t46 07 73~„ 00, 00 GRAND TOTAL ALL PROTECTS $956,769,700 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2011 The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County will on Wednesday. March 2{, 2010 a1 7:30 p.m in the Public hfeeting Ruum, Chesterfield County Adminatration Build- ing, Route 10 and Lori Road. Cirrstzrfield, Virginia hold a public hearing mr in&vnra~ rive and fiscal planrrirrg purposes ro con- sider the following proposed budget for the fiscal year ending lone 30, ?011. The public hearing is held pursuant to Sernon Li _' -2506 of the Cnde of] irghua allowing the public ro question and cammrut on the proposed hudgrt. TheBoard of5upenisors will permit per ns desirurgg to he heard an c'PFortunity to ppresent ora(o s ttrn tes~ simony. Throe de ing to br heard are en- auraged to call the Otlice M the Clerk to the Doard of Supenisors at (804) 7{8-1200 to he placed on the speakers list, or may appear and sign up at 6ai p.m. before the meeting. Orr County Administrator's recommended badger synopsis is prepared and publishzd 2011 Proposed for inf rmation and fiscal planning pur- posesonly and is available for public review in the County Administrators Otfice, via Internet at www.chesterfizld.gov, and in all County puhlic libraries. The inclusion in the budget of any item does not constitute mmmmtment or obligation on the pazt of the Roard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County to appropriate any funds for that item primp a The h dget has been presented on the basis of the estimates and requests suhmined to the County Admin~ REVENUE ESTIMATES Commissioner of the Revenue Beginning Anncipared Fund Balance, General Fund 53,{95,000 Commonwealth's Anorney General Property Taxes 359,1 F5,100 Community Development Administration Other Local Taxes 89.7{2,500 - Cooperatne Extension Licenses, Permits, Fres 3,664,200 .CaunN Administration/IRAG Fines. Forfeitures and Usrs of dune}' 3,302,100 County Attomty Srrvire Charges 32,137,700 Drhr Servis Sfisczllanroas and Recovered Costs 11.0{7.200 Documrnt Smites Revenue from the State-General fimd 115,662,800 Economic Development Revenue from the Federal Gocrrnment-General Fun ' d 14035,300 Emergency Conmaunications Center L'xr of Reserves/ Cransfus 20,635,700 Employee Brnefirs Frvenuc from Comprehensive Scnices Fund 4,911,900 Employee Medical Cneter Revenue from County Airport 949400 Environmrntai Engineering Revenue horn Grants C,6%,800 Fire and Emergen y Medical Services Revenue from Risk Management 11,7{5,000 General District Court Vehicle grid Communication \faintrnan<e 18.369,900 General Services Administration Revenue-School Opemtmg Funds 235,603,500 Health Department Revenue from Capital Projects ifmagement Fund ' 859,200 Human Resource Management tt ater ' 4{,ft36,{00 Human Services Administration/DSR/Senior Advocate \~ aslewater 42 5'9.700 ~ brformation Systems Trclmologv/Telecommunications TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUE 1,12 i 1,3,200 Intergovernmental Relations Internal Audit EXPENDITL?RE ESTLMAI'FS lus-enil< ~ Domestic Relations Cuun Azzess Transportation Program 056,900 lucenilr Detention Home Accounting 3,390,900 Invrnile Probation .Animal Control 1.417,400 Lihrary/Law Lihrary Roard of Supervisors 318 500 License Inspr -tion Budget turd Management l,l i 0,800 Local Contribution for Education S nd gl sped n O.S.RUO VF R t tr Rulld9ngg d H ands n 019,400 M g mans ti ~- s Administration C m f O g nizational Excellence - 1 6{,900 Vf nr 1 Hraltl S pp rt Srnicrs (. t C r h dg - 611 100 ~ Drputmental Clerk of Ciauit Court 3.386.000 Pazks and Recreation Clerk « ~ the Boan1 261.100 1'lannmg trator by the Corutimtional Officers and department heads of the Counr}•. There is designation or allocation of any funds of Chesterfield County for any purpose until [here has been an appropriation for that purpose h~ the Roard of Supernmrs. the proposed udget public hearing is for in- formative and fiscal planning purposes and will not hr approved, adopted, or ratified by the Roard of Supenison at this public hearing. The hearing is held at a public facility de- s'gned to be accessible to persons v....?dis- abilities. Any persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should ~ontact lamce Rlaklev Clerk to the Board, at (804) 74A-1200. Persons needing inter- preter services for the deaf must notity the Clerk to the Roard no later than Friday, March l9,?010 2.921,300 Police Department 50,221,100 3,563.800 Public Atfairs h49,400 1,113,500 Purchasing L534IC0 30{,200 Real Estate Assessments 3,pg;,10p 930,400 Registrar q05 10{} 1.-186.700 Reszrves 1,395,600 26.549,100 Riverside Regional lail 7,779,300 1,1{7,000 Sherid 19,30'-,800 1,807.300 Social Services 30,045,100 7.01'_.000 Streetlight Elrarical Costs 763 2n[} 7,638,600 Tax Relief for the Elderly ;,g6{,4p0 75:,400 Transfer to Capital Prose 7s 13,902,600 3.766,600 Transportation 1,154500 44,071,600 Treasurer 3,283,100 ]6-3,500 Waste and Resource Recovery 5,454200 938.900 Youth Planning and Development _ 315,400 4,840.400 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $359,637,800 1,90L500 474.000 Airport 7,009,200 11,898.900 Comprehensive Srnicrs 8,849 100 -"5.500 Capital Proierts Mara rment g , 859.200 %57.700 Grants 1-1,19-I,i(1U 10'_,4np Risk Management 11,7{53><l0 4,634.00 Sclwol Programs ;66,454,000 103,200 Unities Department 7,179,300 Water Operating 35,626.700 501,900 N'astrwartr Oprmting 29,_'71},6n0 9,539,300 Water & Wastewater Capital Projects 20,771.000 6 4n0 Tran f t Reserves 1133,000 1I x,700 'I t ILl It sDepanmenl: R4A01„3110 15.471'00 vehicle d C municanon Mainrenarrie 18,9;7900 7 876,700 Anticipated Ending Fund Balance. General Fumi' "1 {9s,p00 9.045,'00 TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES _l,{ 3 3,98`.-100 , -Plus encumbranss curird fornard in atl funds in an anount not ro exceed $15 million, which wiE he reappropriated imp the fiscal year beghrning July 1.2010. SCHOOL PROGRAMS Included in the F]'?011 Counn~ Radgrt is 356{,225A00 for sthool programs including a transfer from the General Fund of 4282.0{2,600. Also included is funding fur the Appomartox Regional Governors School of 53,425,700. Public Hearing #7 - 7:30 p.m. To Consider the Proposed FY2011 Budget THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FY2011 BUDGET SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. j FY2011 B udget Number' Name Organization/Address 1 Monica Hughes . Lifelong Learning Institute 2 Gary Ellenberger Lifelong Learning Institute 3 Margaret Robertson Lifelong Learning Institute 4 Jim O'Connell _ Feed More (Formerly Meals on Wheels) 5 5 Liess Vanderlinden-Brusse Historical Society 6 Robin Hoerber Resources for Independent Living 7 _ __ Patricia Scott Resources for Independent Living 8 _ Kevin Paul Co-Ed Softball 9 Andrea Brown Libraries 10 Elli Morris Parks and Recreation 10 11 Kathryn Demone Friends of Rockwood Nature Center 12 Pat Campbell Perrymont Middle School 13 Mary Jones Older Adults Programs 14 _ Sylvia Greiner Chesterfield Senior Center 3 15 Wanda Crowder Chesterfield Senior Center ~ 16 Jeff Davoud Chesterfield Senior Center 17 ; Edward Duvall Chesterfield Mental Health 18j _ Tina Hoke Perrymont Middle School 19 Morgan Ledbetter Perrymont Middle School (5 20 Greg Beasley Chesterfield Professional Firefighters Assn. 21 ~ Christmas Mother 2 Carolyn Coe Richmond Audobon Society p 23 Sheila Callear Libraries 24 Fred Grundeman Friends of the Library 5 Mac McMullen 3 6 Fred Demay 27 Emily Kimball ___ Parks and Recreation 5 28 Tela Vanvalkenburgh Mental Health 29 ~ Ricky Russell Mental Health 30; __ DorothyWyatt Mental Health 31 ~, _ Debbie Evans Mental Health 32' _ Heather Seaman Mental Health 1 3 _ Jason Young ___ The Mill House 6 34 Tom Stumm 1'r, The Mill House 5 _ Stumm Sr, The Mill House ~ 6 _ _ _ Ta for Jeniolionis Public Hearing #7 - 7:30 p.m. To Consider the Proposed FY2O11 Budget I 37 ' Brenda Stewart ~+ 38 '~George Cranford J 39 Peter Lipowicz 4 40 Joey Rousch Access Chesterfield 1 Allen Harlow Senior Softball 42 ~ Nancy Frantel 31 43 Jim Evans Historical Society 44 Mary Eberhard Mental Health 45 Allen Anderson Mental Health 46 Tiffany Carter Mental Health 47 Sylvia Bay Mental Health 1 48 Stacy Rogers Parks and Recreation 4 Mike Hairfield ~ Parks and Recreation 50 ~ Rob Nelson Parks and Recreation 51 Phil Daniel CCHASM 52'; Ron Maxey _ PRAC 5~3~ 'd4viznrBt~ees ~P~kf A~ CLP P• ~ Mental Health 54 ; Ram Panchasara Mental Health 55 Cindy Minetree Mental Health 56 ~ ___ Nancy Briggs Mental Health A,~ 57 Judy Stoneman Citizens for Responsible overnment 58 ! Barry Wood Police Pay a 9 ~ Karen Cameron Central VA Health Planning Agency 60 Wyatt Kingston Rockwood Park 61 Daren Gardner ~ 2 Wayne Dillard 63! virginia McCauley Sp~1le e ~.~ ~; c ~ Mental Health 641 Anastasia Kelley Mental Health 65' Ann Weaver Mental Health 66 Podd Yatman Mental Health ~ 67, Niki Gardner Mental Health 68 ltsisii•G~or+it ' ~ _ 69 ------ Ellen Wood ©u+'c~v~ r K~c v ~'~~•~- :~~a 0 Mary Vail Ware l3a ~ 1e• ~ ~ GQ t ~ M o dd 1 PT ~- 71 ~M~ L' ae~ Q ~ct~ ~r' -~'rE~c-I-' ar I(5 C~~, 3 72 Michelle "Shelly" Battista gq i ~~ ~, M . 73I Christy Grammar Mental Health 74 Shepherd's Center S~ 5 Ruth Chappell ~~, r ~,~ Colonial Heights Food Pantry Gq~-C era ,~na 76 Colleen Krezel~ Sc~~~ ~ ~{ 77 1~{ ~ ~ ~ d TFC Recycling 78 Ilene Maurer 79 Steve McGuire Old Dominion Consulting (Parks & Rec.) 80 Amanda Mood r ~~ ~~~~ Public Hearing #7 - 7:30 p.m. To Consider the Proposed FY2O11 Budget 81 'Thelma Watson Capital Area Agency on Aging 82 ' Mac Deadmore Capital Area Agency on Aging 84 Kim Hynes '~CVWMA Recycling 85 Summer Orcutt Parks 86 j Denise Flora ~' Rockwood Nature Center 87' ___ Alex Clark _ Che terfield Challenge Course 88 Kimberly Phelps ~` ` G1 89 ~ ~ Sh al~a.n c,c.~ -~ r C'~C 90 e(la rd u rC~ 91 ~'~ r- l'CPC ~k o r ` / 0 94 Tw 1,` Oe X02 ~',, y Jtil ~, { ~... _~ _ r } 95' t ,~' '_. l'0 v~ ,,1 . - 1 Zj ~q l~~ ;r ~ _ ! ~ ~ '.J ~l c1. ~ ( .. ~~,~96~ ~~ ~ ~ ~,~fr ~ 97' ;~ l ~ v 98'~ 99' 100 ~ ' 101 !. 102' 103 104 ____ 105 __ _ 106' 107 108 !i -- 109 110, 111!, 112 ---- 113 114. 115 _ 1161 117 118' -- _ 119' ------- _ -- - -__---- -- -- 1201 - 121 --- - -. ---- 122' 123 _ 124 ,. titstorp tearnin~ Ira~tltubs P.O. Booc 1090, Mididhian, VA 23113 (804) 378-2527, info~gid~esterfiekl.org Sponsorod by The Yrginia Center on Aging at Virsinia Commonwealth Univarsityy, ChssteAield Counter and Chesterfield County Public Schools March 24, 2010 Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, VA P.O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832-0040 Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board, Mr. Stegmaier, ~R r The Ufelong Learning Institute in Chesterfield (LLI) would like to extend our appreciation for your support of LLI in the past and your continued support of our program. As always, we are very excited to share with you the data that demonstrates our continued growth and our service to the Chesterfield community. We could not reach so many in the community without your support. We know, because of the current fiscal environment, we have to navigate our way through tight fiscal constraints. With this in mind, 1 would like to once again share one significant statistic regarding our request for continued support of LLI again this year. Five years ago the county provided $33,000 for 61 senior adults to participate in our programs. Last year we received $26,400 for 586 members. Effectively, this means that our funding has already dropped by 92% per person. (2004 = $540.98 each member: 2010= $45.05 each member) In addition, we anticipate our membership number will continue to increase. P/ease considerke~evir~g t4rhatever financia/ support posslb/e. Additionally we have raised our membership fees twice in the last two fiscal calendars. It is very difficult for many in the older adult age group to come up with additional funds. Your partnership and financial support is needed to help keep our program accessible. With participation, we have found LLI members remain active and involved, serving as wonderful resources to our community and not just service recipients. With continued appreciation, /~~~~ ~-`v-- Monica Hughes Executive Director Ufelong Learning Institute ~ i~ } _ ~' . - - Chesterfield SEN{OR Center 5Y I~~ ~, G~~ ;,~- f !~ ~ ~ a ~ G. ~a P ;;. ~~ ~ ,~ j .^ r~ r. ~ .... .i `Y'r sut.'~j rill i... . _ - „ ._.___~ r. :4:.~iii: i"17 ~!l. l'%S ~.~, l f .~_' .:.%at~OS;=~~t23"JVI!9.ii~i March 1 S, 2010 Supervisor, Marleen K. Durfee Matoaca District Dear Ms. Durfee: The members of the Chesterfield Senior Center request financial support from the Cheste~eld County Board of Supervisors in the amount of X25,000.00. In prior years Parks and Recreation has disbursed funds on our behalf. We request the funds be disbursed directly to the Chesterfield Senior Center. We know the senior center will continue to grow. Therefore, by not going through Parks and Recreation we will be able to charge membership dues to help with the cost. Thank you for your consideration. Your suport is critical to the continuation of the Chesterfield Senior Center. Sincerely, ,,, .,. .` ., ~.. C'il j~ ~~ Sylvia Griever Chairperson, Plans and Programs Committee ~'t March 15, 2010 ~r Chesterfield SENIOR Center ._ r--' ~L+.~-.i"-- ~J-":~i l~r~~ ;~in_zsl L~»;,r~ t~~':1.: -%ti-' .. A .... '~ ~ ~ .. Cflt..v3 „feu v"J?"^c.i! Chesterfield County Supervisor Marleen K Durfee Dear Supervisor Durfee: As we enter our third year, we know that you are as excited as we are by Chesterfield Senior Center progress. Understanding, there is a drastic need to cut the county budget, our requesr this year is for X25,000.00 to be allocated directly to Chesterfield Senior Center. By not going through Parks and Recreation the amount we are proposing is a cut of X15,000.00. It may not sound like much, but working together can make a difference for seniors, adding up to a powerful pro-senior message during difficult times. In appreciation, ~~~ ~~l ~ ' - ~~,~~/ Martha H Dockery Secretary, Plans and Programs Committee CHESTERFIELD SENIOR CENTER 2010 PROJECTED BU DGET INCOME Member Donation $4,000.00 Chesterfield Coun $25,000.00 Fundraisin $6,500.00 Contributions $1,000.00 Interes $28.00 TOTAL $36, 528.00 ~ ~. •s xi /~" EXPENSES .~~3Y cfi zh'~.. L"e` :a~f~'fSi'F~J~ Part-time Sta $15, 924.00 Su lies $1,000.00 Phone/Web Site $744.00 Exercis $9,440.00 Posta a $300.00 Utilitie $4,800.00 Insuranc $770.00 L al Fees $250.00 Events/Entertainmen $1,000.00 Grant-in-aid $2,000.00 Gifts $300.00 TOTAL $36,528.00 S ~ ` ~~a K~'r ~ ~ "~ P~b1.c l-~e~-~~~ -~'7 We, as members of the Chesterfield Senior Center, do petition the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors to continue ~. funding the Center because of the benefits of exercising our bodies, minds and hearts through the activities and fellowship we enjoy at the Center. Name 8 -.3 ~ 0 `\~ v .+'~~'1'+.~t, '~ Phone # 7~ 3 -i ~ ~~ q~~ - r ~7G-4N5o ~~9-.S"~F-.s ~~ - i. ` _~ ~. r 1 ,~ ,, ; ~ ,~ ~ - '~ ._ -_ ~. ~. ! ~ .~~ ~-~ lU ~I ~ O~~S C~, ~~o-~az(~ r 6/1 ~' ~C/51~C ~ ~~~OCJ ~4 v ,~ ~ Irv ~ ~ c a .~"`.%~-~ r 763 ~ ~ ~7~ f ~~~! ~ ~ 7 ,~ ~~ ~~ 3~ ~-~~"9s`' ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ G- ~: (~ ~ ~, Wa~~ 739 s o 7 v 7 ' , .~ °~~ ~ ~ 8~ y~ - sy~~ i fa .~ ~ ~ !. ~ '+. 1 ~ ~ ~' ...1~, A /-1 S ~- ~ _> i.. L~ L_ ,77y-Cv~~r7 ~rn2.- 7./~-mom ,~ ,_ f ~; 2.39-g1 ~ ~__ __7-3._~ -.S~S~~---- ;, ~ c 7~(~ -333 ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ 639- S $~3 ~~~ (,~ c~ ~ 3 9 - Sa r16 ' ~ ~v~ J .~~- ~",~ti,-n'P~~" ~~~~~ goy--8/5f`3~t7/ --- _. _. - J P. tis ~._~~~~ -^- `~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ _ ~Y~ - ~~z~ -PiL~ a°~1a ~ ~o r `: ~ ~ ~ i-~ ~1 l t~1-~, _S~-i~- L ~~'''a'~ 735 ~ovS -~~ ~~~ , p' ~. --~--- ~~YU~,y ~ y~~. S ~e~~~er # ~y (~ K b 1, c ~~-P ar~~~ -#~-7 We, the undersigned, are petitioning that the funding for services at Chester House not be curtailed. ~~ ~ ~c~-~~:,~- GZ ~ mow,, ~' , ~ ,~~~" ` ~~~ c '~a l `~ "~ 1 ~ ~ u n~~r ~ ,~ r ~ n e S ~ x to r~ ~~~ ~ ~ _. c ~~ ~-~ ~ ~S ~ ~ ~ 5 f ~~~~L ~~l~c~i~~2 ~c~i~eS Q2 ~`~ -~ a ~~ ~~~~ /~~ c,,~Yl 4 if ~ .-, ry 'tom I/~~, .~- Greetings Board of Supervisors: First I would like to thank you all for allowing me to speak this evening. In the neaz future a decision will be made that should not be taken lightly by any means. This decision proves to be a challenging testament towards the future of Chesterfield County and its extracurriculaz activities. I come before you all to express my viewpoints on such a matter as this. These aze a few facts about me: • I am a Junior attending Lloyd C. Bird High Sehool • I am a member of the marching band and play trombone • I have asthma and use band as a method of strengthening my lungs • I recently received my Eagle Scout with the Boy Scouts of America • I am looking forward to going to college in the near future and continuing my participation in music as well as majoring in forensic sciences. Now we ask ourselves, "How do we expect to be accepted into the college of our choice when there is no curriculum available in this county to support it?" This same idea goes for scholarships as well. If I want to go into a decent college that is predominantly music or sports-based, how will being accepted even be a possibility with no such curriculums available in our schools? My college education greatly depends on my obtaining scholarships. Colleges use a student's involvement in extracurricular activities to judge their experience in certain fields. Statistics show about 75 percent of 12- to- 17-year-old students who participated in an extracurriculaz activity are on track academically compared with 60 percent of students in this age group who did not participate in such activities. I would like to know how you propose to help with these shortcomings on my college applications and if this would potentially keep me out of college. I challenge you to consider what our youth will do with all the spare time. Extracurriculaz activities get kids involved and educated, keeps them offthe streets, and cuts the level of crime down significantly. Involvement in such programs also gives kids a sense of close friendships in times when teens are most vulnerable to bad behaviors. Unfortunately, parental involvement is lacking within our culture due to the working environment and busy schedules. At times, these activities are the only way pazents can be involved in the lives of their children. I am afraid that without these activities, the saying "Idle hands are the devil's playground" will be more prominent. I am doing my part with regazds to keeping grades up and modeling good behavior. In athletics, arts, music, cheerleading and many other activities, you will find the majority of students in these programs adhere to the Chesterfield County mandated core values, which aze: • Respect • Responsibility • Honesty • Accountability I ask to put yourselves in MY position. At one time or another you were involved with some type of extracurricular activity, were you not? The majority of the County thrives on the fact we have such programs to further educate the public in ways that most classrooms cannot. In conclusion, this is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. If these programs get taken away the chances of bringing them back aze difficult at best. We can find a way azound a budget shortfall. It may require lots of sacrifice, but we can do it. But we CANNOT cut funding for these programs. We can't do it. The repercussions of such a move would be more far-reaching and widespread than any of us can ever imagine. I thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, ~~ ~ Taylor J. Jeniolionis S pea 1C e v~ ~ 3~ l . Good .Evening, Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, and Mr. Stegmaier: I am George Cranford, a member of the Chesterfield Historical Society of Virginia and I reside in the Midlothian District. 2. I want to thank the Board and the County Administrator for your openness and willingness to hear the concerns of citizens throughout the county in numerous public meetings held in all magisterial districts. I have attended quite a few meetings. 3. I acknowledge the difficulty and the challenges facing the Board and the Administrator in balancing a budget for FY 2011. I know it is not an easy task. President Truman, when faced with a Korean War, and a host of economic and political problems, reduced all federal workers one pay grade and it worked for him. Even though I proposed to you a reduction in pay for county workers, I know now that you are not going to do this. ~. I am a volunteer with this County, {Police and even somewhat with Parks & Recs), Last year I donated over 1000 hours to promote history and I have worked closely with the history staff. I have seen these 5 people promote and teach history: I watched the sites manager, Holly Rush, scratch out an idea on a sheet of paper - a country store exhibit and turn it into a reality. She supervised the entire construction process to make it a show place for the County. That is just one of the things she has done! ! I have observed a young staff member, Bryan Truzzie, in his outreach programs teach a 6 year old child about colonial history -something that child will never learn in school. 4n Eppington Day, he is certainly in control of the events and that day of events has always run smoothly. He is very reliable and a pure joy to see working his jobs. I would say Farks and Recreation has always gotten their money's worth out of him and the others on the History staff: 5. i have worked with ali the staff members on numerous historical exhibits at all the sites in this County. The exhibits are not as easy to construct as it may seem. It takes planning. The people you now have in these jobs are necessary to keep your history alive. We have a 1©t to lose if you close the prograrns and the sites. We lose, not only our history, but a lot of tourist dollars too. b. In closing, and in an effort to keep the historical program, I strongly urge the Board and the County Administrator to reconsider funding of the Parks and Recreations historical programs. Thank You. No More Reductions, Please ~~ , -z ,,' =k_ .: ~ ~ _~ My name is Nancy Briggs for those of you that do not already know me. I am a member of the Chesterfield Community Services Board and am here this evening to pled with each of you concerning the allocation of extremely scarce resources. As a County citizen, I read the news each day and see where reductions have been taken and the amount. For those of us actively involved with community services of mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse every slash of the pen is like a death toll. We are one of your most efficient and effective groups in the county with advocacy groups meeting not only with you, with parents and caregivers, but also with Senators and Delegates of the General Assembly. We continuously work with our consumers and teach them job skills, daily living duties and responsibilities, as well as how to overcome physical and mental challenges. Work does not stop at that point but supports are also built so they can have consistent training at home; thus maximizing their exposure to tasks required for living. Each one of our consumers wants a life like yours but are faced instead with rocks in the road toward achieving their goal. We served 4,503 mental health consumers, 2,087 mentally retarded consumers, and another 1,966 who experience substance abuse last year. We have waiting lines of desperate families and consumers needing help; we just cannot put our hand up and say ".... you don't count; we don't care about your challenges..." In addressing our mission needs I find we have already taken over a million dollars in reductions which included a restructuring of the organization for consolidation of tasks and identification of positions that are no longer necessary. We have looked high and low for supplemental grantorship programs that could fill the gap. I understand that other County departments have the same need as we do but t find it extremely difficult to equate bricks and mortar to the saving of a life. When my house is on fire, I certainly would like the trucks to get there within 15 minutes instead of 25 minutes because there were dollars available to build a new fire station closer to my house than the previous one. If someone was breaking into my house, I would certainly want the police to be there soonest to catch the perpetrator in the act of breaking in or stealing. The convenience of having a new sports complex nearer than the old one is great when you're planning a family outing to see a softball game and it doesn't take long to get there and find seats; but none of these events are absolutely necessary. "Yes" more would burn in the fire; and "yes" the robber may get away at that particular point in time but he'll be caught later. I don't mind driving a little further to see a softball game if it means taking care of our venerable population of special needs citizens. Our special needs community does not have options of service support as some do; they need them now and will die without them. "Yes, l said, DIE." Supports put in place and funded through the County are the life breath for our venerable citizens. Over and over again it has been documented that without help, encouragement, care, and support, our citizens die. We pled with you to not let that happen. We humbly request no more reductions be applied and create another rock on the roadway for them. Subject to you questions, this concluded my briefing. ~~,~~~~ ±' ~ ~ l -Ca I I C'~ v-~ ~ Y~ Z C F .~ ~~~ ~i.over H~(.~ ~Cew~.ewta ~Sc L ~~, ~ hoo http://chesptuowf,i.wt.c~wi. A COMMUNITY PETITION TO SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Still want to help fund education7... IF YOU WANT TO HELP THERE IS STILL SOMETHING YOU CANDO! We, the undersigned, ask the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to listen to following needs of your citizens: * Reallocate the $12 million our school system has saved in previous budgets, so that it goes back to our school system. * Allow our school system to establish our own "reserve fund". When we make cuts and come in under budget, the school system can draw from that reserve fund and the money comes back to the schools. * Continue funding education at the current rate of 61.3%. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE >l. Y 2. ~~~ ~S ~~. -c 1~11C~~ IN~-~~ ~c~ C~" 3. iZf~7- ~ ~. ~ `r IiK~C ~ r 13/C~ 0 ~r~C. ~;~nl/ ~ ~ D Z ~ /z .~ ~ ~ ~~Oa Creek ~~` h s ~ s. ~~ ~ tl ~ a l / ~ 1 /n~ / J /~I ~ I,~ ,~ 1 l~r~ / ~~~ ~. 1 ~, v ~l ( u« ~ a ~ - ~f~s C+- f. L.,~;~ I ; ~,-~, ~~ ~~~~ `~ ~~ ~ ~~ L.;~a• do ~.~C t,il E ~~ X -~~~ CIS ~ti<<~~ 1s, ~ ~ ~ 1~1~C' ~~, NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE 1. itb li vl ~~~ i~~l~ ~ v!- ~ `~`f c/~u~~Ut'i2'!'t'c-'I~.LCrI//G. ~rC~~o S7 7 , // /~U V~ ~ ~ ~~ $futo ~~m +on ~' -on~-j CSI • I d h ~ C D ~ ' ~ 2. , ~ #~ ~ 3 ~3 a eS ~ i e - I ~ u-~ 7b'~ `~ i~r ~~ r Pf crt ` , 3. z fs 3 Z_: 4 ~ H,,lvCrvS y~// ~ iHl~!/EJLrI'~Ny ~ L /7 f ~ ~ L /~~ - --- . t /Z i ~ i r - c - - - - ~~ J 1 ~ L(.L,~,(~Q ~ ((~ . ((~ 3 ~` ~ 3 z d ~. 6. ~1 ~~ ICS ~- -2~r >C( ~,~~<' ~11i ~ G1 ~ ~~ c ~ ~ ___ - , ~_ -~ - jll.~ ~ ~ ~~ c~ L -.~ /1 ~ JS t- . = .r l ~ 9. ~ ' r p Ugn / ~~(`~ ~~ ~~1Z~ `.x7~lJ~~S~nG~:~ ~l lo. ~~ ~C~;C~L M~~i~'tcxy~,~P ~3t ta-- ^ C1~G~1 ~ 1~~"L~ ~~~S~pvt 11. (~ ~~ JUC~-C ~ M~\c~r~V~-r"`\Cx:tl V ~ a~lla-- ~' F~° I~ ~ 3Y~y ~~~ r~. _ C,~.-~,.~ Ar~,<< 12. .- a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ /f ~ 3 ~ ~ 2 3z~~ ~,~,,.~~ ~~ ~Z~ f/ r ~~ ~ ~~~ ls. ~ 1~ ran ~ ~ S ~..~ ~~ p~- ~~ ~~ 16. rn ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 17. 18. !. v~ .3 ° ~ ~ ~~~ Clover ~t%l,1, ~l,ewc.ewta r~ school. http://cht sptavwl.~v~t.cow~. A COMMUNITY PETITION TO SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Still want to help fund education?... IF YOU WANT TO HELP THERE IS STILL SOMETHING YOU CAN DO! We, the undersigned, ask the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to listen to following needs of your citizens: * Reallocate the $12 million our school system has saved in previous budgets, so that it goes back to our school system. * Allow our school system to establish our own "reserve fund". When we make cuts and come in under budget, the school system can draw from that reserve fund and the money comes back to the schools. * Continue funding education at the current rate of 61.3%. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE ><. ;`~ ti~~ oil ~~ I ~ C~ 3. a,.d(q l t W ~ol.,~s~ SP~I ( t_c.i..C l 7~-~, l G+ a. ~~ ~' C~ ,6i v >f= o% 6. ~ ~ ~ ~. 133(`3 ~S~Cs~-'~t s. I ~ ~ ~~ ~O~nC,~-C- ~ ~ "` u~~ ~ ~3 ~ m ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ j o~ No~~- ~~~ .. io. ` ~dl~~~~ V~ ~/a , NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE OCR ~ `~ra~- G- 2. ~ ~ /f~ 2~ l (~ 3. ~ ~ f ~(~I' ~ 3~Z. l .~ ~ C~ f V`' ~ ~O ~- Ori/~ ~~,V~LC.- L,~ . Y ~~1 ~ 5. ~ I~ ~~ ~ I[z- ~ 1~105 F- leas ~ .. r 6. ~ ~ ~a - ~ 112- Iu Z i I W~I~- ~ sl- ~--~. 7. ~oQ /1/(~ ~~ ~l~r:Q.~o f~c v~- Z31 12 ~~ ~=j° c( c~ ~ r r s rZ' d~ -~ 0~3 l[a1.- ~ rn X ~ ~ Z ~ (~ ~~~'vw~.U.~ b v 9. 1-2 ~) I C L 10. ~ ~0 ~ ~ ~' ~ ~c i, ~7~-Qi u ~(~ V/~ ~3l l 2 ~-~~~-~l Z. 5113 S~(trev arch t,a.~- 11. ~,i d~-loci c~,v..~ VA- 2 3l~ Z 12. ~~,,.._ y„~ i ~-lo~:~. ~11~1 23 i~2 /,, 6C~6 ~vss C~-~1,c ~~ ~ 13. /~.IRY ~C~l~~ ~p ~,gn~ V Z~>l~ ~ lo2p£3 ~~ ~-7C2 Cvvc oaT~Tr= 14. /zi~~•r ~r ~ 15. C~er~~~ ~l~l i/~ a3a~- i ~ a e/ C^~ ~ ~ d.~ Z3t~3Z 3~u3 M~l(,f~r,,yLak~ ~ / 17. Q ~V1G- ~.S GLS M,aP(o~~:~.-... , vA a3'' a ~ =~~~ S;q LAke. C~~z~. ~~ o 18. ~Pn Q ~ 1~ C h~ ~~c-~~I~~ C~ a3£~3~ NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE 2. . ~-.-~/ 7~02~/ ~/.~~~ c ~~~. La 1 > s Liu J w ~~ _ ylD~ ~~ 5~..,.,,n a 4. ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~u'~ S~ ~~ ~"Z-CSt'~-f ~k~ I,~ZG!~C.~ ~,"~'~ ~ 1(~ f ~`~.~ ° ~ OAS G 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 1 r aL °S v .~ ~~~C Clover i-t%Ll. ~l,ew~.ewtar <SchooL ~g~ ~ http://chesptaowl.i.wG.cow~. A COMMUNITY PETITION TO SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Still want to help fund education?... IF YOU WANT TO HELP THERE IS STILL SOMETHING YOU CANDO! We, the undersigned, ask the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to listen to following needs of your citizens: * Reallocate the $12 million our school system has saved in previous budgets, so that it goes back to our school system. * Allow our school system to establish our own "reserve fund". When we make cuts and come in under budget, the school system can draw from that reserve fund and the money comes back to the schools. * Continue funding education at the current rate of 61.3%. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE ><. ~~ M~~~~ rw~~ r~~~ ~~ 1~'~U~(Ear~~ (~Z~i,1L foil-(G~ ~ ~~/u~ y~(loo I~a~t/s ~ ~ CI' 3, kri s~~n S }OY1 e. ~5 72 eathP~C ose / C~es~tr ie(d V/~ L3&'3~- .~~~ a. 'hC.11~-~11i~~n ~~2~3 wa~~c~~5~ ~ _ x(11 C~.~OE h\0,~ , \"~ ~ ~- 5. ~ ~v~d~ ~ 1a k.L ~~ 6. Jo.~ M~K..,~.,.~y I~1b13 uo~ ~ ~,.~ C,~s~ v~ ~ V~ Z~93Z ~it~ ~( 7. ~ C-rreeh.e. I32oy Cate '~ (-~: (V~:d i g. ~ l~t~ I ~~~i I ,Spvu~~nSh~ r~ ~~,,-, ~t c,-~{-~,- w~ ~ ice, ~ ~ 9. ~ ~ -~? Jae ru X81$ Na( a~c~ ~ecfac~ C s~l~ :~ A 2 3 E32 ~ ~ _ , lo. --~ ~ ~X,YQ~ ~~ ~ ~ U (k I~(7Y ~ Si cl ~- ~/ ~c1 lu 2 3IC'z- l~-. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE ~~l(o ~ ~~ o ~~Sl/~ ~3~1/~-- 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. ~~ ~{,Lt~th.~i, ~~ ti ~`~_ ,~ clover Hill, El.ew~.ewtart~ school. l~ttp://chesptuowl,~we.cowc, A COMMUNITY PETITION TO SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Still want to help fund education?... IF YOU WANT TO HELP THERE IS STILL SOMETHING YOU CAN DD! We, the undersigned, ask the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to listen to following needs of your citizens: * Reallocate the $12 million our school system has saved in previous budgets, so that it goes back to our school system. * Allow our school system to establish our own "reserve fund". When we make cuts and come in under budget, the school system can draw from that reserve fund and the money comes back to the schools. * Continue funding education at the current rate of 61.3%. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE rn ~sl qu t~ C~iOundha~ ~ R- ~. n i ~~~~ ~C2.r me ~ 3goo 6Leh Qa.ks C~ Ches-ter V A ~ ~g3 ~ ~ . ~~1~~~r~' 2. , ~ Q ~ C~ L ~ 3. ~ ~ ~ 3~0 ~ I~as-~,',~qS r. - _~,..._ ~ 14102 -~-c~nc~ C~~~-'~ ~_~--- S. QI(~ r 1 ~ ~~ ~~1°'' 1 ~.. 7 i tC1~~\ ~. ---+.~Li v.'~~ ~ ,L.~~r' _ ,. z ^ j ~ i ~ ~ f i.~V~/ f., 6~, f~L r~~1`t~:-'., , . ' ~ S j "~(~~,5 J ~.~,~ I i S C.. ~ ~ 1 `-~ ~ o ~ s a.~~cx~fo rd ~dg, 9. .Z 3 [2 lZS ~3 S'~Y'`~ S C-re~s ~ G /'~~. ~1 ti d V ~ ~ ~ v.v ~ ~~ ~ l V V v / y V` a ~S J ~~J'~ Ciover 1-t%I.i, ~I,ewt.ewtar Sc1~ooC `- ~ ~~~ http://chrsptaowl.%wc.cov-~, A COMMUNITY PETITION TO SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Still want to help fund education?... IF YOU WANT TO HELP THERE IS STILL SOMETHING YOU CAN DO! We, the undersigned, ask the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to listen to following needs of your citizens: * Reallocate the $12 million our school system has saved in previous budgets, so that it goes back to our school system. * Allow our school system to establish our own "reserve fund". When we make cuts and come in under budget, the school system can draw from that reserve fund and the money comes back to the schools. * Continue funding education at the current rate of 61.3%. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE ~ SIGNATURE i. t~ ~ ~-t l~ ~ `~ t ~l ~(o i ~ ~ rn ~ ~.~ ~ a U ~ 2 (12 ~ ~ J ^E/(i1 2. ~~ a. n ~{ i a t~ m 5700 ~i~c~ ~orn-f- Ct ~ 0?3 i/ 2 5. _~ L ~ J~ o-~' / 7 93~ Fe afrler'ChdSe, ~C/~' ~h e~~er~i e~~ {~/~ a ~~3.Z ,: e 6. ~~~~~~ ~ 7i ~ ~~?~G9~ ~/ , 7. 8. 9. 10. ;/~A~ r~ s+ J 1 r'C clover Hill. 61,ew~.ewtArt~ school. ~://GIr1E5ptp0 v1,~.1.-tiC.CDYi~t. A COMMUNITY PETITION TO SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Still want to help fund education?... IF YOU WANT TO HELP THERE IS STILL SOMETHING YOU CANDO! We, the undersigned, ask the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to listen to following needs of your citizens: * Reallocate the $12 million our school system has saved in previous budgets, so that it goes back to our school system. * Allow our school system to establish our own "reserve fund". When we make cuts and come in under budget, the school system can draw from that reserve fund and the money comes back to the schools. * Continue funding education at the current rate of 61.3%. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE i. and L .~loo~ 1~3 I ~ ~l la Cafe r u~ 2. ~ ~-~5~~ad ~ ~c 3. - ~.~0 0 (~-~ ~ , 4. n'~7(~D~to~-~ ~~~ lam( 5. / W 6. / / 1~+~ ~ ~Yb `~ 5 ~+~.~ ~~~ C=am ~ way ~' ~dlo 9. ~. 'c'a ~ in ~~!o 13?0;6 ~3i 10. ~ ~ 1 T'k~n~e~"~ i ~ 0~3~ 0 I~ s~ J ~~~ clover Hill. El.evu.ewtar~ school ~://GY18SptR0 vl.I.6VtiC.GOtM. A COMMUNITY PETITION TO SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Still want to help fund education?... IF YOU WANT TO HELP THERE IS STILL SOMETHING YOU CANDO! We, the undersigned, ask the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to listen to following needs of your citizens: * Reallocate the $12 million our school system has saved in previous budgets, so that it goes back to our school system. * Allow our school system to establish our own "reserve fund". When we make cuts and come in under budget, the school system can draw from that reserve fund and the money comes back to the schools. * Continue funding education at the current rate of 61.3%. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE 1. (ti'10.1~~-ZIQ .. .~ '' I ~• 23126 '~~' • 3. a. `~ . 4. ~ c~ C,~,e,Y tar 19.2 o S. ~vah ~c~ t C~re. w~. ~ c~ l 2 31 ~ l.o b~ .~~ ~. 6. w~~ ~ s ~ l31 ~ ~t/,~fiiEtY C'r', / ~/ Z // 3 I, I/' I~VCr ~. ~ ~y~ Q~~~ ~ N~a, ,~ ~~ti s. /I ff er` M~rr~S g~a a of ~~ ~. Z~~-rna V f} a3a3~ 9. Jana ~Ql.(i~e ~ I a i 2 ll ~a. (~k~,k_ C.~.I~ ~?13 ~~~,}~Gf~ , ~~ IL ~~ s ~~!'c cl,over Hill. ~Levu.ewtar~ school http://cln Ssptao w(.iwG.cow~. A COMMUNITY PETITION TO SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Still want to help fund education?... IF YOU WANT TO HELP THERE IS STILL SOMETHING YOU CANDO! We, the undersigned, ask the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to listen to following needs of your citizens: * Reallocate the $12 million our school system has saved in previous budgets, so that it goes back to our school system. * Allow our school system to establish our own "reserve fund". When we make cuts and come in under budget, the school system can draw from that reserve fund and the money comes back to the schools. * Continue funding education at the current rate of 61.3%. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE J~AN~~l~C ~~tG~~1VG~ 2. ~s~,~ ~~~. i er ~ ~ -~' ~~.. ~~.~ .~ 3. Ki rcL €~~s~n Sc ~rnS / 5. ~nr~U ~ ~i NI nv~ac,a ~ M~~s~~p ~ ~ ~ C~,N ~ D I l uf"Vtl a n . V~ M~dlcw-tan Ifi io2~8 ~~, ~~~~ (n. 6. ~. ~~~ ~s~ ~ ~ H5 9. - ~ Ivls ~~22''1.s~I' lo. ~ _ ~h ~ ~ ~ei~ ~ ~~ ~ ~" cr7~~ a~ ~ ... ~~ v~ v ti ~~~ . C(,over H-~CC ~l,ewc.ewtar5 sc~oo~ "" I'://GI'1 CS'~3tRD Y~I.1.v4C.GDYK. A COMMUNITY PETITION TO SUPPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Still want to help fund education?... IF YOU WANT TO HELP THERE IS STILL SOMETHING YOU CANDO! We, the undersigned, ask the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors to listen to following needs of your citizens: * Reallocate the $12 million our school system has saved in previous budgets, so that it goes back to our school system. * Allow our school system to establish our own "reserve fiznd". When we make cuts and come in under budget, the school system can draw from that reserve fund and the money comes back to the schools. * Continue funding education at the current rate of 61.3%. NAME ADDRESS/PHONE SIGNATURE 1. n ~v~n~ ~i ~Al,J ~'111D Lwik w~•~~ tIC, ~ 3a _ 040 ~ ~ . 2. .l~ c ~.~~~~ 4y1T t.r~.e Sw-r,« i~r 3 ~ .~ 3• ~~ ' ,- ~ 14~~f'f 1,Lca~i ~l o~ ~K . M; ~~o i-~~M, /A X3!!3 , j' - 7lC 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ~j pew i!e v° ~~~~ Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Budget Hearing on March 24, 2010 Comments Submitted by Senior Connections, The Capital Area Agency on Aging Mr. Thomas M. Deadmore, Board of Directors and Citizen of Chesterfield Thelma Watson, Executive Director Mr. Chairman, Other Members of the Board, County Administrator and Other Officials. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on our FY 2011 budget request to the County. Senior Connections is a regional agency providing home and community services to older adults, persons with disabilities and caregivers. We appreciate the local matching funds provided each year by Chesterfield County and other localities in Planning District 15. The Agency has received local government funds since 1973. These funds are needed to leverage state and federal funds awarded by the Virginia Department for the Aging based on the population of persons age 60 and over in each locality. The local government funds are matching funds that allow us to qualify for the federal and state funds. We are thankful to the Chesterfield County for providing $83,380.00 in FY 2010 for services that have kept at risk citizens from having to use more costly services such as nursing homes and assisted living. These services also prevent residents from having to use Medicaid and thereby, saving government dollars and empowering seniors to use community options. In return, we will be able to provide approximately $441, 995.00 in essential services that are provided more cost effectively than the County can do since we are providing the same services in other localities. Outcomes for those served include improved health, fewer hospital admissions, reduced emergency room visits and the opportunity to remain in their homes and communities, where they prefer to be. Families and caregivers also receive much needed services and supports that enable them to more effectively carry out their caregiving responsibilities without burnout or having to leave their employment. At least 1 in 4 citizens is a caregiver for older relatives or friends. Our services are very valuable to our families and help them to maintain independence. For FY 2011, we are respectfully requesting $62,714.00. Without this amount, we will be forced to reduce services to our vulnerable citizens. The requested amount will allow us to leverage state and federal funds to continue important and critical services to include: • Meals and Transportation • Friendship Cafe Programs at Covenant Presbyterian Church, Ettrick Community Center and Bon Air Presbyterian Church • Case Management, Information/Referral and Assistance • Personal, Homemaker and Adult Day Care • Emergency help with Home Repairs, Medications, Mortgage and Rent • Counseling for Money Management, Budgeting and Benefits Enrollment • Legal Assistance and help with Wills, Powers of Attorney and Advance Directives • Senior Employment and Volunteer Opportunities • Caregiver Training and Help Finding Resources In closing, thank you for your ongoing support to the older citizens and families of Chesterfield. We appreciate this opportunity and others to represent and serve them. ~N NFany cif ycru maY ar wag not he avvare~~~e ts.~that~eat~fief~ ~ . tougheconomic {unesr E}ne ofthe ~tY~~~~unn~~hese p~pasals~ m~e.Yc~save-s;ia~r~osethg:ood Nat~mc~enter ERNC}~:and~ all: e ~ ~ ras~3e.atia~tal':P~l ~-thelic ' ~b~~d girl. scou~;:~a~dventureran; senior "' - _. ~~~`SOL' c-Pras> ~: ~~~e~ly in order to save the ~Cautrty money: 'Dais flue of the= . the Chesterfield cammuni °~ ~~- ~ opportos to ~~8:cit#ze8s afevery age a~m~~r: It.is imperati~:to~k this-~f~ility running_andpro ` ' :o~eaehto. ~. vidmg pFesent.and~future gen~.~~p~~~:~C: Please~ign, this petitian~and helps to:keeixour doors many efthe. PeOP~~$ ~~do nat lo:how ~rnpo~ant this cemer 1g:ta cam.:Please: sho~u~ .,~ ,~> programs fan'. offered at-thia fi~-~} a~d-~ ~ ms~g.the;.~r~g~~txnter op~ ~f you would: mare. it~foFenztion ~-i~es~:arr ~~3oio`the~. - ekwvesd'~ature tenter please email friendsofrockwoodnyahoo com for sfi+s;; -~,c::Caunty ~:~u be having a public meeting. regarding this as 1Viarch 24'~ at. 7 ~ pervis®rs:will ~t#~e final` announced on rile 14s`' budgetsions~~ll be ~P , yon must act .nawf . ~'hee Nature ~.~-its: legacy ~w~ll -:gone per-momently bY.thisMay:without°y~r sugpartF .. `By signing. this petition I certify that I anQin~avar of k ~,~te-~o~wood.l~Te.~snter opm:~n order to further. much: needed education II .our. cx~nnnunity ih Clb~ld-E~~u~r ancf#~e-oundi~-areas.,, Prime Name Sig tare. enratl {oPt'ionall ~oumy . c~ fish ~-~~~ C~ (~ .: ~~ ~ N ~G~n~,1"ria, own ~~ M~~ 1-ov, 9 ~~ ~ Cam- ~-~ ~~~ ~u (~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~- '~ ~b~e cc~- t~ ~~ y C~/~~ ~s~~~~~ y ~ ~ Print Name ~Signa~ a~ x a~~ Gam---,~,_ =cam.. ti email {optional) ~o~ty R~~~~ A ~~='~s 3 ~~c ~a11 !~ a~~ \` `~ (~ Print Name I G ~ t-t+.1 ~~~~ IK ~~~~ ~, ~ ~. 'A~`~{'1 Q~Ii n /h E0 i ~s~,1 n 4.k~ ~~ r~ ~~.;, 5~.:,~ct., --.~~_ ~n 4 ~ ~ c~-- . r---~,...~ c~nrct / ~ ~~ignature email loptional) ric~, ~u~ ~~k ~ vim, ~,~ ~ ~ YY)F~' c~ n~~ c~c~-, •,Q CuSJA~n .~ ~o~nty R~~~~ m m yam .~ Print Name Signature email taptional)~ / ~~ County r~ G ~~hrGt 5ow~ _ _ ~~~ ~ ~ 1 , s /I G Pa~~kg ~ Pg ask ~.~ Dui T i r ~I~° . __ ~~ ~~ T ~~ Print Name ~J , e , Signature M ~cfiR~C ~eussr~ M~u~ ~iW ~.~,L e ~ f ~~ ~, email {optional) bounty R~ ~~ c~.nefi~ Je~-~~~-~ o~s~C~ yeS .~ ~~ cove 1/I~l-QQ.1SSo~ ,111.(.l C~L4Q ~o es y ~ d~ c ~/_ ~ .., ~,, _ ~, !J =~ ,~ 1 x 5 h ctn o n ~ P r~ o Qom, S ti a.~ o -, P r c~o.~p sharssi,~rx~2ooZ~yc~hoo Y ~k 51~1.f ~~~~ ~~ 1 G~~cO ~¢ G~~j,~ ~~~ ~ ' hac-~es C~e~ I~- ~-- f ~ I _ ~T Pi ~~`~-col ,~o m Su s fl ~u /~- ~~ S . Kp ~~~1 ~ ~ y/~ ~ a u ~ t, u M Sus~erngr~[9SL~ ~~1~, ~ Y Y Y ~s-`~~__ Print Name ~.. T ~ S ~' ~~,-~._ ~.~,.~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ r J e 1~ S~gnat~u'e email {optional) County ., r Reside~.~y/~ GlonF:,~n ®c,r.e,1.C.a,h ~ ~a ~c ,n,a -~ ~~ ~~~~. r b~~a-~ Ic.cv ~ ~~h~ ('art, I'~; (off ~~`7~'1~ ~~ „I-~~ S~~ c` C as~~l ~ . Cam, scas~~,3 ~ C~~no~•c.~M (~i I- ~ •~ ~~ v ~~~ f'1 l~~~l YJ!' ~ ~ ' ~~ 6~-~ ~a -~j05 3..'-/,~OD3 aLioG• C~~ ~~ C C ~ yeti Zon nc~- ~~ ~ a ~,,.. rim ~ am,~ • ~~~ ~~ Je~ti~t~~.~ ~re. Y Y Print Name Signature email {optional) County Resident ~y/N) ~~ Y ~-- ~~~~~~~ ~_ Iv o ~~ a V ~( ~' ~aO~P~ a~/.din ~ndrea_~G/u~r~,c U Print Name Si~nattue email lei}) County Resided ~y/~ J ~ ~ , 111 eyed i t A--~_ ,~ r.Cit,~ ~~ ~~ ~o W. ~' ~,.~ ~S y r 1~1~~i~Q 7 b10/ u~ n ~,wi c . c a~t~~~,~ ~~.rK~,a.1 ~ ` ~ `a ~k~~ 'v'""`--~' ~ ~~n n e~ v a h - ~ -.~.. ~~ w . ~ ~, Y Y L~ ~ 5~~ ~ ch (~ Cam ~ r~he~e 14(~ U.~j~,c~ Print Name Signature _ email ) County Resided ~Y/I~ .D ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ y ;.~ .~ C~ ~~ ~'~ elw ~" ~~ifs fl k~ ~~~ ~~,~ ~ ~ ~ Q~~ n~-e,~r ~' J ~C ,, I G ~~~1 ~ ~~ L.V s -~ .~ --~Y G ccr~sn~, n~~ 6 I made T (~.U.e~r~ Zau, N.Q,~ .c/ N Y 1 ,~ (~ ~/ _J 1 Print Name ~c~,o~ C~o~r~d; T~ ~~~~ T S'e email loptional) bounty ~e~~.~~ Y ~~e~Cl ~-~~ ~' ' l ~s~-.~~i6o I ~ ~toc . ceM T c ii, 111 ~\~~~ - ~ ~ ~~ n~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ c ~~- ~ ~ ~-~~i1~~i s ara.h ~a~~. fr ~~~ ~ 1~~~~~;,~ ~~Q~n o ~~ ~~.,~~ ~n:~ r ~= N V ~ .~ ,~ lU a y tti Print Name Signature ~ email' bounty C~ f2~ C' ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ Ms ~ Reside~4Y~ U y C~z v ~ ~ wl ~zo ~„ ~ I~~-- ~ ~~~ ~1 ~ ~ ~~ y ~ ~_ ~~ a ~ ~1 ~~o ~ f~ ~ ~~~ ~ud~e-K C~~~~~ ~~a P~~~e s °~ nCjr~u. ~le G~~c- [~6~e s+~0 r~~ ~ ~~~~ r ~ S l l~ ~(~~W~a,~.vtcs~edk Y Y t- L L Print Name S~na~ue email {optional) ~n~lle ~1i~P. , al nn ii ~ Ve~-K 0~~ ~ '~~ "G:S p V1 ~eu,~ ~-1~ ~l~~~a i~.s s~„~ ~~ n~~ l ~ Q c 5/n,un~ G\ County Reside. ~Y/I~ 1~b~cx ~ mi Zel l c~4hon l..vM -T----~ , l Y Sl iA~ tXu n~~ ~ ~C~an~ ~nAollon/p ~c~ r ~ 5 Print Name Signature ~ email <aPtional)~ ~- ~ ._ M~~i~~ t ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~, 1 ,.. / I ~ n ~S ~12Q_~0 VYi ~~~ ~l County R~ ~~ W ~' ' ,,- ~~ ~d~~~/ ~, - ~ ~S ~~s ~~ ~-: Print Name L~ -~. MQ ~i~~ ~ r ~-102~~5 ~~~ J_ IVC " Q l-W~~ 0\ - _-ems-~ ~~ l~erscl-~ =~ ~~ - email (optional) County Resident (Y/N) ~- ~- ~_ Y ~- ~_ _y. --{~Mo,,,-c~ ~,~I~P~«.,<l~ -~ y Signature email (optional) County ' Resident- ~'Y/l ~~ `' ~ `~ ~ ~ . ~ 1^ I~ I``~1ar i a Smi 1-h `1 r~c~ ~- N. Y w~ Cat '~~ ~1 , ~,~-~ _ ~hei~i~ ~6 iSS~TGu ~ ~ to y ~ a~ ~~ ccym Print Name Signature _ /11c,~,~~q ~~cT~, GCS Print Name Signature email {optional) Coun Resided ~Y(1`1) ~rstil~, (~~,5 _ ~~ y ~7~' ~r.~.~ / ~~S M ~ ~{e f rtl~e c (o vrJ,~ ~~ ,~<I~ c~~~u~-~ ~~ C~ ~^ E~-K I~ ~~'~ -fir ////„ N ~`~ ~' ` ~~-LL~ ~nl~tnxs6l h~4~m, P~ un,..~,~,A~ ~Jh~ ~ e ~ zl~6~A ~K/4~ Print Name 64f Cce s~~~e~ ~h G H-4 ns};riu seS S~nature email (optional) bounty / R~ ~~ ,-r .~ ----~_ ~ I n n ~ Tnrti ~/ X c ~ ,~ ~ F ~ 0 1 i ln~~)1,v~1 U ~ ~oc~ic erg 1YLL~ ~5r; J ~1~,J -YIS'~yw. ~~e~,l~ ~ ~r~~~ GJo /tee Z~V /+-~ ~.t/ c~ wog--K~a~S t Y Print Name Signature mail e (optional) County e ~ Resident- ~Y/1~ 1 ~~~~~ ~~~ .~~s ~u-n ~u~ -,~- ~;~ ,~ PC~.~ ,/ ~L d ,.JUi~ eS Lhe.l~ P~. ~ ~ ~n r~- ~~e~ nh~ ~rn~.rUrh ,~ Print Name S~Snatwte email ~y)y County f~ Resided ~'Y/I~ ~L~L_T- IZG n~ ~ ~fj CI ~" Y ~NGn 1' \~.r~t;C.f ~c~U ~ ~ Scoff G/~ ~ -~e ~~~ ~~ ~~~ _ ri n ~Tr ~~~_ ~ ti~~ i vr~ _____ ~r h ~, ~~~ a < < a --~ u,ll s v~3~ . ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~@ ~ n/, ~ v ~ ~- r z v ~- S~trdnN~ v ~ Ao . L'a~ Print Name Signature -; ~ ~~-~~ ~ Z ~ ~~d ~~c~t d email (optional) County Resident ~Y/N) Id ~ ~ 1 ~t~vv~ ~,~,,,.~ ~~i C nnr ~ ~rn ,~I-!'` ~' G~ Co,~ ~ 1 bcir`annagv~ 1(c~ ctp~,Cc,M ends ~ ~ 5 u va ~u;~c~ . ndU ~-- ~1kRy EN-~~nx,~rz ~~~~ .~~+r~uvnXq~r~~cogc,.rtQ.~ Je Y1Y11tt r N~itcV).~r ~ ~,U,~, ~ , ~~ ~ c~~avual~(~y~hoo.~om ~ B~f-1~~`Yi- ~~or+c~h ~,YAjWO a ~ . _T S:T~ ~,.~-~,~ ~S T~ ~ . ~fR z~v~u ~ , `/, ~s Print Name Signature ~~,~~R~~~~~ ~~ email {optional) bounty Resident ~Y/N) r ~~ai ~ ~e M, c~ o-a ~ ~ ~ G~1-c~-Q.~ ~~E~ ,~L~~ 6~ rna~ ~'~"~- ~~. ~h~ ~-5~~~ C I ~~- r-Qc ~ ~ ~ ~ -~-- Y 6~b A~~7 1~-c~:01~ ~l i e n~ s- ti~ Y ~ a~.s~ L-~~,~,2~J ~~ z~~ cox-U~ .~. Print Name S'e email (optional) bounty ~ ~~~~ ~Sy,./?0~ if ~!~a. S ~kSQ -"` ~Y'P ~ -~- ~ ~urrr~y'al~~/~ row G -~ f'~ ~ C~ ~ SG ./i ~__ 2~l 17 ~ .5~~ 1~0 hJ ~, . ~'~v,elle C~. P~~~~ ~o ~~ ~~~ %' r~C ~cse ~~ ~~ 9 P° l lo~< , dd va hce~ ' G CCU U2riZan, ~.-- ~ r S' ~~ .2.~,.- U~5 ~~ ~~S `L ~~~ ~/° -~~ Print Name ~Signatut~ 'Qse Fl „ /6a r ~/.a. i.a., / / email (optional) County ~,[~~~~~ o ~~ ~~ ~ ~ f /~ ~~ ate. ~` ~ .b14~r~1 ~ ~, ~r*,, Crt,n GLS(~Jt~.~. S ~ 1 (7/1v~ 1.~ ~ y~ ~ ~ r `~~~'" -~uv~l ham, C.~~ l~ .,~ ~~~ "'~ ~ ~ ~o~ -„ o ~ ~1 ~,3 ~ ~ ~ ,-~ ~ ~ ~_c ~ ~ ~- S S ` ~ ZICS~ C r, r~~,r ~~~~~ ~~w ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ G r ~ a( ~~e ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ 33 ~~'` ~O~V1a/l~0.gvii ~ c~a~,Cc~~, ~ ~~ Print Name ~(~, Sah -'m ~ cn~c~, V.d~lln~ l~,i..ll email (optional) bounty Residen~~~Y/~ ~'~~~~nuc~~ ~~a~~~hP~- 1. ~ ~; ~~~ i~ ~ e~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~,~ _ - ~ U ~ P,r~ ri L~~G7~ ~ ~ `r-- L C,,9 ~~ l ~ ~-o T,Q Q1v~M- ~ t~.~./ I ~~ ~~ ~~~~ J~~~ne I o~y~ur~ rn ~Signattue is Cs C nn ~~~t~~~ r X T /~ ~rv~~~ ~~o~ 1~ 411 J ~2 /!1 ~~ .~~~,. ~~ ~~~ ~ ~J ------- ~ ' .~~ M~~ ` S ~~ ~ , S ~SUa ~~~~ s~- ~ U ~ ____ ~~L1b~ f 1 "~'~"''~~9Jbl n9~~~ (t~oudol jt~ua s ~~ ~i U ~ ADI ~-y, LI,i .~l tl V V "V~. auxBH;uud Print Name Signature t i i ~- email ~~~io~9,, county Res~de~.~y/~ ~,wl C~C-~ ~ ~27~4 ~a, l c~nc ~1,,-~ «~ ~ -~ a~ _ ~~ m ~ I~. 0~~~~~~ ~ ~ L~-~1 N Y Sh~~~~ ~ S~l~~~, -----~ ~ ~~ ~~ ( g~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ach e~ k~ S ~ ~l cz ~~~~ ~ ~-~ ~~.o~ ~, a~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ S<K.o ~~ ~ ~~o N /~~ __r__ ~~ ~~-y Y-~~ ~- I; ;i-was>~ ~.7~~ ~1 ,. ,,~~ l~ ti T r ~~ l' ~~ ',) C~~ ~~ nr~7~a w 1 S ~v~~~~ ~1 ~~~ rv ~Cluno~ ( o~d ~ ~~ ~ v o~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ s~~ ~ T ~ 3 ~-~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 11 U i~ . o) jtema S. auxeH Ruud CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA the Meeting Date: March 10, 2010 Item Number: 18. II Subject: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on April 14, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room. Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No #