1964-06-25 PacketVIRGINS"= at an a journed meeting of the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, held at the Courthouse on
June 25, 1964) at 2t00 p,m,
Present
Mr. H.. T. Goyne, Chairman
Mr. Irvin G. Horner
Yr. R. J. Britton
Mr. Herbert O.Browning
Pir. J.Ruffin Apperson
Mr. A. R. Martin
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by br. 1 artin, it is resolved
that the following Ordinance be and it hereby is adopted;
AN ORDINANCE to amend the Chapter 6 of The Code of the
County of Chesterfield, Virginia, by repealing Par.6-7$
thereof and by readopting and reordaining Par. 6-78 concerning
the procedure to following in taking a blood test.
Write usual resolutions requesting the Highway Department to take
into the Secondary System of roads the following roads:
Roads in Chester -Percival St., Snead St., Stebbins and Daniel St*
Roads in Holiday Hills; Hollyberry Hills; Bruce Farms, falling
Creek Farms, Dorchester, Conner Heights,Quail Oaks; Southam;
Ken -Ray, Ballard. Oaks, Barleth Heights and Lake Crystal Farms
Subdivisions. Prairie Road in Bradley Hills Subd.
On motion of tir.N:artin, seconded by Mr.Browning, it is resolved
that the officials of the Health Department be invited to meet
with the County Board of Supervisors to discuss the future of
the Soil Survey Program.
Mr. Robt. Painter, County Engineer, comes before the Board
introducing Mr. Gilbert, of Gimbert and Gimbert, Contractors.
I,x.Painter explains the matter of contractual arrangements,
liquidated damages due to failure to complete the project on
schedule and other aspects concerning this matter. A!r.Gimbert
asked for help, that he did not get the Highway permit on time,
that there were adverse weather conditions, and that his firm
lost money on this sewer project.
Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr.4�pper'sogy seconded
by Mr. Britton, it is resolved that this matter be continued for
further study.
On motion of Mr.Britton, seconded by k1r. Apperson, it is resolved
that the Special water Conigract A-601C, for North Lake Hills
Subdivision, in the amount of $1136.00 be and it hereby is approved.
On motion of Pir. Britton, seconded by Mr.Apperlon, it is resolved that
a Standard ;J,t er Contract 598-A, for Engelwood Subdivision, in the
amount of $2455.20, be, and it hereby is approved.
On motion of I,:r.Britton, seconded by P'x.Appperson, it is resolved that
the contract on the Elkhardt water tank, 6413-A,in the amount of
`;,52,665.00 be and it hereby is awarded to the Dorcan Construction
Company.
On motion of i,r.Apperson, seconded by I,ir.Britton, it is resolved that
the contract for the installation of water mains from the present
water tank along the Elkhardt Road to Kingsport Road, in the amount
of " 50,274.70 be awarded to Lingerfelt and Carpenter, and the use of
cast iron pipe is specified.
On motion of Mr.Britton, seconded by Mr.Apperson, it id resolved that
the contract for dredging of the Falling Creek Reservoir for silt
at the dam in the amount of w9,990.00, be awarded to TI.O.Snellings.
On motion of rir.Britton, seconded by Lr.f.pperson, it is resolved that
a 30-day notice be given to the lessee of the County -owned house on
Falling Creek in the event that a satisfactory arrangement cannot
be made with the lessee for the depositing of silt on this property.
On motion of P'ir. Britton, seconded by Mr.Apperson, it is resolved that
the subdivider of Shenandoah and other subdividers in the general
vicinity sharing in the cost of the water line to be constructed
on Rt.60, from Buford Road westwardly, be reimbursed from the connections
made within their subdivision.
On motion of Dx.Britton, seconded by Iv1r.Browning, it is resolved that
the developers of the Miniborya Subdivision and adjacent subdivisions
be authorized to install a 12" water line from Meadowbrook Estates
Subdivision to the Miniborya A artments project and the County to pay
the diffeBence in cost betweef� $" and 1211 line, provided certain
easements be granted for the continuation of this line to Cogbill Road.
And be it further resolved, that the first 100-units constructed at
the I;iniborya Apartments, that the same be charged for water connections
under the old County policy, since this project was started before the
new policy wad adopted.
On motion of Mr.Britton, seconded by 1°1r.Horner, it is resolved that
as of this date the refund for offsite improvements or oversize
mains be made from connection charges for apartment projects on the
following b asi s
(a) $75.00 refund from each t'�100.00 per unit connection
charge.
(b) If the charge is made on acreage, the refund shall be
75% of the connection charge.
M
M
On motion of Mr. Britton, seconded by Mr. Horner, it is resolved
that the County Engineering Department be requested to make a study
of the feasibility of running a sewer line to the new school on
Forest Hill avenue.
On motion of Mr.Britton, seconded by Mr.Apperson, it is resolved that
contract S-64-13C in the amount of 00,855.00 for the installation of
concrete sewer pipe from the new Davis School to the Powhite lagoon
be awarded to the firm of Lyttle & Barnes.
On motion of Mr.1,:,artin, seconded by 1'.r.Browning, it is resolved that
a Variance from tr a Subdivision Ordinance be granted to 1•.r.Willard Lee
to allow the construction of a building fronting on "A" Street in
Bon Air, immediately west of the portion of "A« Street that has
been abandoned, and since it appears that this is the only site
available for a dwelling it is further resolved that the owner of
said house be allowed to improve "A" Street to his specifications
of a private drive, and that the County has no responsibility in
maintaining or improving said strdet.
On motion of Mr.Apperson, seconded by 1•s.1,.artin, it is resolved that
the Purchasing Agent be authorized to construct a fence around the
Fire Training Center at a cost of approximately $1000.00.
There was presented a statement from the State Auditor of Public
Accounts for the audit of the County for the fiscal year 1962-'63
in the amount of W"7243.29. Upon consideration whereof, and on
motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Nr.Britton, it is resolved that
the Treasurer of the County be and he hereby is requested to transfer
the sum of $3300.00 from the unexpended surplus of the County to
1A, so that the bill for the auditing of records of the County may be
paid.
On motion of Mr.Apperson, seconded by h'Tr .Brit ton, it is resolved that
the contract for furnishing 18 new Police cars be awarded to the
Richmond i,lotor Company, who submitted the low bid of $1962.40 per car.
There was read a report from the Commonwealth's Attorney concerning
the boat landing on the Virginia Electric & Power Company's property.
On motion of Mr. Appdrson, seconded by Mr. 1.artin, it is resolved that
this Board requests the Power Company to extend the lease of this
property for a 10-year period of time in an effort to have the
Department of Game & Inland Fisheries perform certain work at the
landing.
On motion of Mr.Apperson, seconded by Mr.Martin, it is resolved that
this Board approves the request of the Comr,ionwealth's Attorney
for the sum of $45.00 for vacation replacement of the Secretary
in his office, with the understanding that the State Compensation
Commission will pay half of this amount.
- 3-
Dir. Painter, CountyEngineer, presented certain plans for the 'program
of damming the Swift Creek to form a water reservoir as a source of
water for the County water system4
Mr. Ernest Gates presented certain than es in the contract between
the Chesterfield Land and Timber Corporation and the County of
Chesterfield.
Mr. Louis Powell, Chairman of the Board of Directors for the
Chesterfield Land and Timber Corporatibnt comes before the Board
stating that his family has owned the land for many years and generally
agrees to the conditions as specified,
The Edecutive Secretary presents a Press Release generally describing
the program which is filed with the papers of this Board.
Upon further consideration of this project and on motion of Lr.Horner,
seconder by IIr. Martin, Be it Resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County approves the draft of the :agreement dated
June 25, 1964, between the County of $hesterfield and the Chesterfield
Land and 1mber Corporation for the right of the k3ounty to acquire
an easement to flood land of the Corporation on Swift Creek and its
tributaries upon the terms and conditions therein; the Agreement of
the developers of prope- ty between the proposed Swift Creek Reservoir
and State Route 711 to construct a 16-inch water line as set forth in
a letter of June 22, 1964, upon its terms and conditions; and the
Option Agreement for the acquisition of the right to acquire permanent
flood easements from other landowners adjacent to Sfvft Creek and its
tributaries for the construction of such reservoir; and,
It is Further Resolved, that the Chairman and Clerk cf thisBoard are
authorized to execute these contract documents on behalf of the Board
of Supervisors when the same have been approved as to form and contents
by the CountyEngineer, the ExecutiveSecretary, and the Commonwealth's
Attorney (6f this County; and
It is Further Resolved, that the Commonwealth's Artorney of this
County is authorised and requested on behalf of this Board to do any
and all acts necessary and proper to make effective this resolution
and further to take the necessary action to obtain all approval that
may be required by law to use this area for a source of water supply.
It is further resolved, that the County Engineer and the executive
Secretary are authorized to negotiate with the landowners for the
acquisition of flood easements along Swift Creek and its tributaries.
Mr. John Andrews cites certain building discrepancies in a home
on Aldridge Avenue in which he moved into in 1959.
Lr. Mumma, Building Inspector and Mr.Spencer representing the Health
Department, discussed with the Board the responsibility of their
departments. `4hereupon there appears that no solution can be
reached at this time and the matter will be studied further.
It was generally agreed that the additional lights on Westfield Drive in
lvaidlothian as recommended by I.r. Lartin be referred to the Light
Committee.
-4-
M
9
On motion of Mr. Britton, seconded by P'r.Horn(�r ) it is resolved that
the minutes of March 11, and 26, April 8 and 23rd, May 13 and 28th
and June 11, 1964, be and they hereby are approved.
On motion of Mr. xpperson, the meeting is adjourned to July 8, 1964,
at 9:00 a.m.
On motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr. Britton, it is resolved that
the Treasurer of the County be and he hereby is requested to transfer
from the unappropriated surplus of the General Fund of the County
the sum of $40,000.00 to Item 17bl-the School Board Budget.
n
M
AN ORDINANCE to amend Chapter 6 of The Code of the County of
Chesterfield, Virginia, by repealing §6-78 thereof and by readopting
and reordaining §6-78 concerning the procedure to follow in taking
a blood test.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY,
VIRGINIA:
1. That §6-78 of Chapter 6 of The Code of the County of Ches-
terfield, Virginia, shall be repealed, and a new section to be known
as §6-78 shall be readopted as follows:
Sec. 6-78. Same --Use of chemical analysis to determine alcohol in
blood; procedure; costs; evidence.
(a) As used in this section "license" means any operator's, '
chauffeur's or learner's permit or license authorizing the operation
of a motor vehicle upon the highways.
(b) Any person whether licensed by Virginia or not, who operates
a motor vehicle upon a public highway in this State on and after
July one, nineteen hundred sixty-four, shall be deemed thereby, as a
condition of such operation, to have consented to have a sample of
his blood taken for a chemical test to determine the alcoholic con-
tent thereof, if such person is arrested for a violation of §6-77.
(c) If a person after being arrested for a violation of §6-77
and after having been advised by the arresting officer that a person
who operates a motor vehicle upon a public highway in this State
shall be deemed thereby, as a condition of such operation, to have
consented to have a sample of his blood taken for a chemical test to
determine the alcoholic content thereof, and that the unreasonable
refusal to do so constitutes grounds for the revocation of the
privilege of operating a motor vehicle upon the highways of this
State, then refuses to permit the taking of a sample of his blood
for such tests, the arresting officer shall take the person arrested
before a committ:g magistrate and if he does again so refuse after
having been further advised by such magistrate of the law requiring
a blood test,to be taken and the penalty for refusal, and so declares
again his refusal in writing upon a form provided by the Chief Medical
Examiner of Virginia (hereinafter referred to as Chief Medical
Examiner), or refuses or fails to so declare in writing and such
fact is certified as prescribed in paragraph (j), then no blood
sample shall be taken even though he may thereafter request same.
(d) Only a physician, registered professional nurse, graduate
laboratory technician or a technician or nurse designated by order
of a court of record acting upon the recommendation of a licensed
physician, using soap and water.to cleanse the part of the body from
which the blood is taken and using instruments sterilized by the
accepted steam sterilizer or some other sterilizer which will not
affect the accuracy of the test, or using chemically clean sterile
disposable syringes, shall withdraw blood for the purpose of
determining the alcoholic content thereof.
11%
(d-1) Portions of the blood sample so withdrawn shall be placed
in each of two vials provided by the Chief Medical Examiner, which
vials shall be sealed and labeled by the person taking the sample or
at his direction, showing on each the name of the accused, the name of
the person taking the blood sample, and the date and time the blood
sample was taken. The vials shall be placed in two containers pro-
vided by the Chief Medical Examiner, which containers shall be
sealed so as not to allow tampering with the contents. The arresting
or accompanying officer shall take possession of the two containers
holding the vials as soon as the vials are placed in such containers
and sealed, and shall transport or mail one of the vials forthwith
to the Chief Medical Examiner. The officer taking possession of the
other contained (hereinafter referred to as second container) shall,
immediately after taking possession of said second container give to
the accused a form provided by the Chief Medical Examiner which shall
set forth the procedure to obtain an independent analysis of the
blood in the second container, and a list of those laboratories and
their addressed, approved by the State Health Commissioner; such form
shall contain a space for the accused or his counsel to direct the
officer possessing such second container to forward that container
to such approved laboratory for analysis, if desired. The officer
having the second container, after delivery of the form referred to
in the preceding sentence (unless at that time directed by the
accused in writing on such form to forward the second container to
an approved laboratory of the accused's choice, in which event the
officer shall do so) shall deliver said second container to the chief
police officer of Chesterfield County, and the chief police officer
who receives the same shall keep it in his possession for a period
of seventy-two (72) hours, during which time the accused or his
counsel may, in writing, on the form provided hereinabove, direct the
chief police officer having possession of the second container to
mail it to the laboratory of the accused's choice chosen from the
approved list. As used in this section, the term "chief police
officer" shall mean the sheriff of Chesterfield County.
(d-2) The testing of the contents of the second container shall
be made in the same manner as hereafter set forth concerning the
procedure to be followed by the Chief Medical Examiner, and all pro-
cedures established herein for transmittal, testing and admission of
the result in the trial of the case shall be the same as for the
sample sent to the Chief Medical Examiner.
(d-3) A fee not to exceed $15.00 shall be allowed the approved
laboratory for making the analysis of the second blood sample which
fee shall be paid out of the appropriation for criminal charges. If
the person whose blood sample was withdrawn is subsequently convicted
for violatinn of §6-77, the fee charged by the laboratory for testing
the blood sample shall be taxed as part of the costs of the criminal
case and shall be paid into the general fund of the County.
(d-4) If the chief police officer having possession of the
second container is not directed as herein provided to mail it within
seventy-two (72) hours after receiving said container then said
officer shall destroy same.
%AW `,10
(e) Upon receipt of the blood sample forwarded to his office
for analysis, the Chief Medical Examiner shall cause it to be examined
for alcoholic content and he or an Assistant Chief Medical Examiner
shall execute a certificate which shall indicate the name of the
accused, the date, time and by whom the blood sample was received
and examined, a statement that the container seal had not been broken
or otherwise tampered with, a statement that the container was one
provided by the Chief Medical Examiner and a statement of the alcoholic
content of the sample. The certificate attached to the vial from
which the blood sample examined was taken shall be returned to the
clerk of the court in which the charge will be heard. The certificate
attached to the container forwarded on behalf of the accused shall
also be returned to the clerk of the court in which the charge will
be heard, and such certificate shall be admissible in evidence when
attested by the pathologist or by the supervisor of the laboratory
approved by the State Health Commissioner.
(f) When any blood sample taken in accordance with the pro-
visions of this section is forwarded for analysis to the office of
the Chief Medical Examiner, a report of the results of such analysis
shall be made and filed in that office. Upon proper identification
of the vial into which the blood sample was placed, the certificate
as provided for in this section shall, when duly attested by the
Chief Medical Examiner, or any Assistant Chief Medical Examiner, be
admissible in any court, in any criminal proceeding, as evidence of
the facts therein stated and of the results of such analysis.
(g) Upon the request of the person whose blood sample was taken
for a chemical test to determine the alcoholic content thereof, the
results of such test or tests shall be made available to him.
(h) A fee not exceeding five dollars shall be allowed the
person withdrawing a blood sample in accordance with this section,
which fee shall be paid out of the appropriation for criminal charges.
If the person whose blood sample was withdrawn is subsequently con-
victed for violation of §6-77, the amount charged by the person with-
drawing the sample shall be taxed as part of the costs of the criminal
case and shall be paid into the general fund of the County.
(i) In any trial for a violation of §6-77 of the Chesterfield
County Code, this section shall not otherwise limit the introduction
of any relevant evidence bearing upon any question at issue before
the court, and the court shall, regardless of the result of the
blood test or tests, if any, consider such other relevant evidence
of the condition of the accused as shall be admissible in evidence.
The failure of an accused to permit a sample of his blood to be
withdrawn for a chemical test to determine the alcoholic content
thereof is not evidence and shall not be subject to comment at the
trial of the case; nor shall the fact that a blood test had been
offered the accused be evidence or the subject of comment.
(j) The form referred to in paragraph (c) shall contain a brief
statement of the law requiring the taking of a blood sample and the
penalty for refusal, a declaration of refusal and lines for the
signature of the person from whom the blood sample is sought, the
date and the signature of a witness to the signing. If such person
refuses or fails to execute such declaration, the committing justice,
,, ,ftw
clerk or assistant clerk shall certify such fact, and that the
committing justice, clerk or assistant clerk advised the person
arrested that such refusal or failure, if found to be unreasonable,
constitutes grounds for the revocation of such person's license to
drive. The committing or issuing justice, clerk or assistant clerk
shall forthwith issue a warrant charging the person refusing to take
the test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood with
violation of §18.1-55.1 of the Code of Virginia. The warrant shall
be executed in the same manner as criminal warrants.
(k) The executed declaration of refusal or the certificate of
the committing justice, as the case may be, shall be attached to
the warrant and shall beforwarded by the comitting justice, clerk
or assistant clerk to the court in which the offense of driving
under the influence of intoxicants shall be tried.
(1) When the court receives the declaration of refusal or
certificate referred to in paragraph (k) together with the warrant
charing the defendant with refusing to submit to having a sample
of his blood taken for the determination of the alcoholic content
thereof, the court shall fix a date for the trial of said warrant,
at such time as the court shall designate, but subsequent to the
defendant's criminal trial for driving under the influence of
intoxicants.
(m) The declaration of refusal or certificate under paragraph
(k), as the case may be, shil be prima facie evidence that the
defendant refused to submit to the taking of a sample of his blood
to determine the alcoholic content thereof as provided hereinabove.
However, this shall not be deemed to prohibit the defendant from
introducing on his behalf evidence of the basis for his refusal to
submit to the taking of a sample of his blood to determine the
alcoholic content thereof. The court shall determine the reasonable-
ness of such refusal.
(n) If the court shall find the defendant guilty as charged
in the warrant, the court shall suspend the defendat's license for
a period of 90 days for a first offense and for six months for a
second or subsequent offense or refusal within one year of the
first or other such refusals; the time shall be computed as follows:
the date of the first offense and the date of the second or subse-
quent offense.
(o) The court shall forward the defendant's license to the
Commissioner of the Division of Motor Vehicles of Virginia as in
other cases of similar nature for suspension of license unless,
however, the defendant shall appeal his conviction in which case the
court shall return the license to the defendant upon his appeal
being perfected.
(p) The procedure for appeal and trial shall be the same as
provided by law for misdemeanors.
(q) No person arrested for a violation of §6-77 shall be
required to execute in favor of any person or corporation a waiver
or release of liability in connection with the withdrawal of blood
and as a condition precedent to the withdrawal of blood as provided
for herein.
(r) The court or the jury trying the case shall determine the
innocence or the guilt of the defendant from all the evidence con-
cerning his condition at the time of the alleged offense.
(s) The steps herein set forth relating to the taking, handling,
identification, and disposition of blood samples are procedural in
nature and not substantive. Substantial compliance therewith shall
be deemed to be sufficient. Failure to comply with any one or more
of such steps or portions thereof, or a variance in the results of
the two blood tests shall not of itself be grounds for finding the
defendant not guilty, but shall go to the weight of the evidence
and shall be considered as set forth above with all the evidence
in the case, provided that the defendant shall have the right to
introduce evidence on his own behalf to show non-compliance with
the aforesaid procedure or any part thereof, and that as a result
his rights were prejudiced.
2. Section 6-78 of the County Code is repealed as of the first
moment of July 1, 1964.
3. An emergency existing, this ordinance shall be in full
force and effect on and after July 1, 1964.
n
M
LAND CORPORATION
6829 FOREST HILL AVENUE
STRATFORD HILLS SHOPPING CENTER
RICHMOND, VA. 23225
PHONE 272-1415
June 23, 1964
Mr. M. W. Burnette
Executive Secretary, Chesterfield County
Chesterfield Court House
Chesterfield, Va,
Dear Mr. Burnette:
We hereby formally request that you take into the State System
for maintenance the following roads in Sections 4 and 5 of
Brighton Green Subdivision, Midlothian District:
1,050= more or less, North Pinetta Drive, Section 4
1,5001 more or less, Forkland Drive, Section 5
9751 more or less, Bayliss Drive, Section 5
7001 more or less, Williamsdale Drive, Section 5
Yours very truly
BRIGHTON GRW LAND CORP.
BLS:bmr Bernard L. Savage
CC: Mr. J. K. Timmons .- This refers to our several conversations.
CC: Mr, George Bruce Sowers
ftw N
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
Cheater Home
Route 1
Chester, Viri
Attentions P,
Dear Mr. chic
Thii
off of Route
found to be x
and are natie
erred.
HTF:b
cc : Mr.
Sari Street
cted and
ications
in conc-
Ys
Ys
went Engineer
In
CM
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24, 1964
Mr. J. L. Longest
Chester, Virginia
Dear Mr. Longestt
This is to advise that t.
Subdivision, have been construct
ance with State Highway Specifi
acceptance into the secondary y to
Percival Street - 1}o n
Snead Street om erci
Stebbins S .t - ro
Daniel St ee - mom Pere
RE:
ng roads in"ter
iace treated in accord-
ie eligible for
3 r et to Daniel Street.
S eet to Richmond Street.
val set to Ri.chuiond Street.
Street to Richmond Street.
Yours very tr ily,
R. V. Lancaster, T11
Resident Engineer
R�'LC is
cc$ Sh am there, Tne. �'
X* W. ett, Executive Secretary,
Chesterfield County Boarri of Supervisors
M
cm
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24, 1964
Mr. Ernest Oates
P. 0. Box 364
Chester, V.rginia
Dear Mr. Gatess
Tals is to adAse that
Subdivisions have been construc
ance with State Highway Specifi,
aco.eptance into Vle secondary go,
Bruce 6treet - Prom 150'4014t o
West :)f C36ke`�"
RUITT
C-S
C
rw Subdivision
ng roads in'lkraip `firms
hae treated inKccord-
ke eligible for
,spring Drive to 30,171
ve (Temp. End)
9271 to Tev. Turnaround.
Yours very truly,
R. V. Laneasterp TTT
Rodident Fn7ineer
tsors
cm
Cm
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24, 1964
Mr. John A. Robins
4101 rorlhan Road
Richnowl 359 Virginia
Dear Mr. Robinst
'hits I.s to advise that
'Ams 6ubdtvision,, have been co
ance with btate Highway Specift
acceptance into the secorylary 9
FULF Ills
eel 640
H , ,
Cqe
,re gory Drive - !tom
RE I
ill
I ,krmham Rial -/Fro-,+,,Temp. Tm-
Subdivision
ne roads in"-.%., 1$tnp "rrelc
d surface treiMed in accor.1-
h%-e eligible for
to Roo' east of" %rdlam R1.
2301 s,)uth of 3m-ory
blurs very tmly,
R. V. Lancaster, r,,-r
Resident En�ineer
7
rvi,sore
12
T73
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 2h, v6h
Broalrock Lani "orps
142 Last Pelt Blvd.,
RlchAomij Virginia
Dear Sirs
This is to advise thnt taleo roads inner
P11 j
Subdivision, have been construct and -Nurface treatpd NAceorri-
ance with tatc 4ighway Specific no !��e eligible for
n a
acceptance i.nto the secondary 4#0 M.
Holcombe Road - From
Narb
firld
RvLrT[: sl
cc: bhnoi
1 14. W,
''Nes.
an-rq)6,47,10 �-I- 1*40
apnrox. )i5n' .5. o'
very truly,
Lancaster# TIT
ent Engineer
On
Lon
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24P 1966
T , T Constructi.on Coo
P. o. iio-., 6775
Richmarvi 30, Virginia
Dear Sirs
ig,lita Snbli..vislon
This Is to advise that th,, Pollowin - rosid has U n ons:ructed
and surface treated in ac,ordance *+�r�tatC IRJ7hWal C1.7, at7,ons
TIN
and are eligible for acceptance 7i ,c-'1,,�ec,)rsdary syste;F.
Rusk Avenue - wrom 4 �pkin ad , S. Property Vne,
R VU ':: sb
ccl 6hoosmtt3
14. W HU10
"--ies;erA
v �1'
t.,iersN15h
4ixecni t
Ux
unt! Boa
very tr-,, 1 19
R.Nq,27 Lancaster, TTT
Resiaent- Engineer
o'T-bIX5eryBars
Cm
m
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 249 1964
Brl.f.,�Iton 'ircen Land Corp.
6P"?') Forest Hill Avenue
Ricq,-,iond,, VIrgLata
Dear zjixt
Zile !.s to advlae t-�iat tae
�ubTLvIsiin, tiave been canstruc
anct- Atn itate 1-1-ighwal Lpecill
acceptance into nhe seconlar7 p
�brkl;ind Drive - atom North
MAI
All i
RVLETT:sb
cc: 6helos
- 0 -Qr*w Subdi.viston
WN roads tn Vo Girecn
U ci.. I.reated in ac(-or,!-
no an. a ell,irible for
ta r ve to Worsham Roal*
Turnamind.
�to T!irmroumi.
ver)r truly#
Lancaster# rrr
ent Enrinevr
re
4111w to
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24, 196h
Kr, 4. A. Gorpentng
Cedar Grov,, ;arni
Bon Airs Virginia
Dear Mr. `,orpenIn.-,,t
Tls Is to advise that
;jibdl-vlsionj have been construc
ance with 6t-ate flitlftWay 6Declft
ac^eptance into the seconlary ip
Cedar 'Trove ftw-iti : Fro,6"T,
Twin llalle�r Rood Prom 0,
Cheyenne Ro,:d 7/!-�i?wln
Cedar lrovfe
Pomlf,ra Rof
Oldham Rosl
011ham Gour
RVI
C 11:
Ort - Hrom
Po
rn elar 11
7 'm Oldham
Ftk
.kowl.., nroals in NlPr 7r6ve Farms
treated in accor-l-
In a elielble for
'nVgr/')rive to Croat-Rn Road
erty Line Turnarouni
Ue Road to North Propert,i Line
0
�lar 'r "oal to Turnaround
j ve llotl to West Property Line
rUZEIE- Rap-1 to lest Property Line
'n
4a to Turnaround
Yours very trAyp
R. V. tannaster, T 'T
Realdent �;nit tneer
Shoos.;.�i �th them, Tne.
M,14, Hurnettp Executive Secretary
Chesterfield County Boari of 6upf ri4sors
Em
cm
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 2h, 1964
Mr. lerman ilovembe
i .6 N' 11EAL'I"t C71P
i'lut;,lal 8-llllin,'p R
Dear fir. ,avembers
This is t
6ubdtvision, has b
ance with State fli-
acoepLt.*jyjCe i.nt.,) th
Uneyenne
,,1.11veul�tsecretary
Cicstil(�'1rounty rd of-lunrnrlsors
Ive
Cm
M
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24, 1966
A
A q , S ifealty Co:ipany
c/o "�;,*.rst .4ortgage Gorp.
P.O. Box uR, Ri
chmond, Virginia
Dear wAr: RE: Twl.n Valle 9 Subdi,vislon
T'lls IS to advise that Vie 0 roads la "An falley '14 me
oubdi vision# have been constru and r-' ce treated i n ace-rmi-
ance with State A,-h4ar 6pec i t, ons a e ell.gible for
accepts �,ce into *tie s,#F.:;conlar-
Ponrlera Road - lkrom-,Gaplen Rdal "t
0
RVLT r
cc:
di
perty Line
rt)r Line
31
s very truly,
V. Lancaster,,
ilent Engineer
y
rvi.tiors
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
Mr. 0. L. 4opki ns
Bon A � r fealty Company,
Bon A' r, VirgiJils.
Sea rfir. 4opkinat
4une 2h$ 1964
FES
tee 6ubdIvis
a
This is to advise that the folYeW" =a i.n vlor 7stmtos
Suty!lxision, have been nonstrictel tnei surf,-cp treat . t ccorl-
aeliel.ble rnce with 6tate dlf,hway d are acceptance '.nt," tlir secondary systAl-%_
Traylor ilrl ve - '+om
iiobby hill Road - itom
Hastings Drive -
RVLT
Col
11 Ian d""jo )[obbv 'RAl "oed
to dastin,!s Drive
to Wainfleot DrIve
very tnilr,
' V. Laneasters TTT
;ul4ent Enrineer
Asore
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DKIPARMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24, 1964
Mr. Harry Grandis
4 Greenway Lane
Richmond, Virginia
Dear Mr, Oranlist
This is to advise that the fo
Subdixisionp have been construct qn�
ance with State litghway Spectflcavtl -
ac-eptaace into the seconlary, sys4;
Autumn Lane - Form
Sunora Drive - From Au
RVLT!Ttsb
cc: Shoosmith th rep
�n
M. W. BU ts ecutiv
Chesteri d County, Board o
RE:
t
.face treat e S
are eligi.ble
ourne
cord-
Atoad Ot 14 F. to Temp. Turnaround
F. to Temp. Turnaround
very truly,
. V. Lancaster, T T
evident Engineer
sons
Lm
rm
COMMONWIrALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24, 196h
C%lesterfleld Construction Co., Une
P. C. Sox 6775
"ichm-ml 30. V*r.-,yinija.
pear airs Rft Quail Oa
This 'a to advise that Sze foll'),"I
bd ivt
'0(j 4 . V 1.9 1 - 'jaVe beL �,j Con3tnj.Ct6*
ante -#1.th SwiftcatVins arty ellf-ible
acceptancc inta tho sec-mlary sys .
Proctors .":o.%d Pron Per Rail I to r rouml
Oa ffbey Road 'tom- Procto t " 3 -win Road
Kenova Road !i'oln �ke s R oa. zsp x. 523 L. to temn.
a to
3affmy Court om 0affney I o turnaround
Kerwin Road m rlock Rbal t laffney RoA
Yours very truly,
Ro V. LaneAstero TTT
Resident taginerr
RVUrTlab N. N.-1/
oat bhoosmith Brotile, c:
He We Burnett, 11xedu eve Secretary
Cheater"Ield "'ouritj Tioard of" Super isors
I
111IF NOW
COMMONWCALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June '$v 19611
Mr. A. W. :trandts
3000 West Le1gh Street
Rik.ch-moaip Virginia
Dear Mr. Graniisl
Thts is to advise t4zAt the "01J&
6wAivisions has been constructed and our
ance with .5tatc, 4t=,hway Specificat'
acceptance UV) the secondary s7ii;4-z
joltett "ond - From
RVT,Tli':ab
cct bhoosm"Ah Broth
14, W,, Burnpctl)s
CheaterflAi-k4
RES so%t.Um sabdivi.sl
net road in%vic,)utham
ce ecorl-
r-,t31
are elib, *-,,f b
Drl ve
very truln
. V. 'bifitcaster, TTT
Wdent Fnrtneer
sore
en
Lm
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
Mann Realty,, Inc.
V02-A %rest 4ill Avenue
Richmond, V.rglnts
Dear bir:
June 24, 196h
Us
Thts ;.a to ,advise that the followtn-7/roal tn Ken-
bubdivision, has been constructed aml surface treate4'
ance with Ststc qtphway, OpeclricationVwr4 Is eligible
acceptance 1-rito the seeondary systemyr
Rey -Kin Drtve - `rom ft,,ams
R VL r: a b
ces Sho,)smith Pro
a *,j tic---**
0 0
Cleater.,
i
0or
I b4 L. Ioal end
\ r very truly,
U a JV
5upev
ord-
R.N.,T)Ineaster, r"T
Resi(INt Engi-neer
Cm
COUSIONWILALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24, 1964
Hr. Ballard rrooker, Jr.
Bon Al.r 4 Vlrg�lnia
Dear Mr, ''rookcrt RES ftl2djoaks
This Is "In alvise that the foll—L—
yrr4sXn Pallord Onks
;5ijbdivision have been constructed &-,-I pf'wft- tt n accord-
��itq state pit, 47- t �A 'r4(- c
anec . hway SpecifinAti.ons and are eligi. . �-r
acceptance into the seconlary systeV.--'-%,
Crooker Drive - 'toss
Rallarl Drive - to, to
to Whar'.-' n
RT' "I I r, t 8b
cc: th
M. W. Bun
`.�hester Z,
Ballard Dri ve
6 of -,)ronerty line
of property line
traly,
V. Lancaster,
kdent Engineer
r 0=1
"wow
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24a 1164
Mrs 'dalter M. Cason
5633 Warwick Road
Richmondl Virginta
Dear Mr. Casent RFt
moo"
Thl�; to to advise that the foll6w4m" n'N
6ubdiviston has been constructed and surface treatedN
ance Ath 6tste 4l,gftway Spectftcattqd`s"is eligible
acceptance imto-tlie secondary systpfiV0---"--,-
Kingsway hoed - Prom
RVLrTT1sty
cc: Shoom
M. W,
Chester iteza
i
k Rood"to1r.ross Rosil
core
.L
tru, Yt
stem TT1
pineer
h 14el.qhts
m-
VW
COMMONWEALTH Or VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 24, 10a
Mr. R. W. Koch
6001 Derwent '-iaad
Rich",nd, Virginia
Dear Mr. Kocht Wl
rn
This to to wivise that the folAam4na =d
%rms Subdivision have been conertucted and surface
ance with State Htghway Speciftc;�tlraNkA are elif-i
acceptance into the secondary systoy-%,
CherylAnn RoRd -
Nortli Cottonwood Rd*
RVLrl'tsb
ect shcoa
M 1 14.
Chest
Lake Crys*l
eud In ac-=orl-
to North Cottonwood Ave.
Road to ';luefiell Rd.
ver,y, trnlyj
R. V. Lancaster, TTI
Resident 1=rngineer
z)ecretary
N,of St3pervisors
Ln
E5
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
June 2h, 116h
ijeecawoolp rnc.
no 1p Box 60
"'hester, Virginia
Dew Li r:
Subdi
Thl,s 'a to advise tha�: Vie fbllowog roads in 6
:pub-Il.viglonI, knave been constructed urface treated
arice with 6t-,te ''k;hway Sped fi e elivible
acceptance into t',le secondary
(4scade - -!`--%m South
Deer
IVILl I I c sb
ect 6AOf)
14. 114
Cfie a
Ortv,d, fo Upp :street.
y Line.
corl-
Drtve to Property L!.ne
very trulyp
Lancaster, UT
ent Fngineer
i sore
CrI STERFFIELD COUNTY HEALTH DEwARTMENT
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Mr. M. W. Burnett
Executive Secretary
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Mr. Burnett:
June 18, 1964
oo,
P 1964 �\
RECEIVED
ROAN OF 99M w
BESTMy
'U
The most rapid developing area of Chesterfield County has been
mapped on original field sheets by the soil scientists during the
past three years. This is a little over one-third of the total
acreage of the county.
This information, when correctly interpreted, can be of great
value to the various agencies of the county in obtaining the best
use of the land in planning, growth, and development.
In addition, it can be of use to the county planner, the en-
gineering department, the school board, the highway department, and
the assessor's office.
The health department has recognized the value of proper soil
interpretation from the soil maps in its daily work and particularly
in working with the planning board on land use in proposed subdivisions.
The demand for the release of soil information has been greatly
increased by land developers and civil engineers. In trying to satisfy
this need through the health department, the soil survey team has
fallen behind on its time schedule.
According to Dr. Obenshain and the V.P.I. Department of Agronomy,
the three soil scientists will have to stay in the field and complete
the soil maps (because they are behind schedule) and do an absolute
minimum of soil interpretation for the various agencies.
This is of great concern to the health department because this
detailed information on the maps is needed now and we can't wait two
years for it.
M
M
Mr. M. W. Burnett -2- June 18, 1964
With this in mind, the health department has asked Dr. Obenshain
if he could find a qualified soil scientist to work in Chesterfield
County with the three field men and their maps to interpret and re-
lease soil information to the departments so desperately needing it.
This he has agreed to do provided certain funds are made available.
The State Health Department feels very strongly that this is the
only sound approach for Chesterfield to solve some of her problems.
They are willing to supplement a large proportion of the expense to
provide a qualified soil scientist for interpretation work the first
year. The following year he could be worked into the local health
department budget on Chesterfield's assigned percentage basis later.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, and if there is
additional information concerning how this position should be obtained
and administered, please contact us.
Sincerely,
"�_*j "
W. P. Wagne �D.
Director
CHESTERFIELD HEALTH DEPARTMENT
WPW:cws
CC: Dr. R. W. Jessee
Dr. S. S. Obenshain
June 3, 1964
Mr. Melvin M. Burnett
xxiscutive secretary
Cbrsterfield County
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Mr, Surnett4l
The writer represents Lae-Fralin, Incorporated, the owner
of Parcels Nos. 1 and 2 on the attached plat. A building permit
has been issued for Parcel No. 1, with an entrance drive adjacent
to Parcel No. 4.
A building permit is sought for Parcel go. 2 but cannot
be issued as "A" Street is not open and improved. "A" Street has
been closed east of Parcel 2 by Mrs. Burton Marys and I an advised
that the land to the north of "A" Street is owned by the Southern
Railroad. Zt appears that only Parcel go. 2 has need of an entrance.
It isa burden to have to improve "A" Street for Parcel No. 2 alone.
In addition, the County maintenance of the street for one property
owner may b4 a burden in the future.
It is requested that the Hoard of supervisors grant a
variance to authoris* a building permit to be issued for Parcel No.
2 upon the owner constructing a 20 foot driveway on "A" street. To
avoid lager misunderstandings and requests to the County to improve
or maintain said road, the present owner could be required to lop *-&*
as a covenant running with the land a provision that the grantee in
his deed and in any future deed takes tit&* subject to the drive being
privately maintained, and net maintained by the County of Chesterfield,
we should appreciate very much this being considered at the
Juror 12, 1964, meeting of the supervisors.
if I may furnish any further infornStion, please call me at
mi 8--4919.
Very truly youm
LAW OFFICES
MIZELL, GAYLE & BINNS
JOHN L . GAYLB
MUTUAL BUILDING
RICHMOr(Fjj)@jVIA
cc I Mr. Willard too �
APA Form 511 12-17-63 5c
Invoice No. 5366
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
A U D I T O R O F P U B L I C A C C O U N T S
Richmond, Virginia, June 19 � 1964
.To the Board of Supervisors
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield) t_Ti_roinia
TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DR.
To expenses incurred in connection with the audit of
the accounts and records of Chesterfield County for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1963, as follows:
Salaries
Exoenses
Amount due Commonwealth of Virginia
Credit General F�nd
Certified to Comptroller for Collection
6, 473.00
770.29
Z 7,243.29
June 19 1 s 64���
As nt Auditor of P is Accounts
NOTICE. Settlement of this bill should bemade by remittance of the amount to the STATE TREASURER, Richmond, Virginia
S ED bids wltf be opened June'
22, , of 2:30 P. ., MEDST in
fhe, ce of Pureha .Grvd �her�
famad county, Chests leld, V rphNa,
yy Y r . W
RICHMOND NEWSPAPERF `NC-
'bW Publisher of
THE RICHMOND TIMES -DISPATCH
Richmond, Va_-- June_ Via-Qbl�------
This is to certify that the attached ---waled Proposal --- --------
was published in The Richmond Times -Dispatch, a newspaper published in
the City of Richmond, State of Virginia.
June 14. 19_b4-----------------------------------------------
The first insertion being given- -;Mt-14s-196k----------------------
fN 1r'
Page 2 - Invitation #r-4-25226-687
Automobiles - Police partment rl
2-speed electric windshield wipers
Windshield washer
Back-up lights
Turn signals front and rear
Cigarette lighter
Dome light
Dual horns
Undercoating
5" seal beam spot light left body post or cowl mounting
with inside control
Color - Solid - To be as follows:
6 - Navajo Beige
6 - Skylight Blue
6 - Wimbledon white
unit
total
The right is reserved to reject any or all bids, and to make award as
appears to be to :-the best interests of the County.
Please return bids to i4r. C.O. Manuel, Purchasing Clerk, Chesterfield,
•.ainia 23832.
14ark outside of envelope with subject 4-64-25226-687, and closing date of
bid.
In compliance with Invitation for Bids #64-25226-687, and subject to all
conditions thereof, the undersigned offers and agrees to furnish any or
all of the items upon which prices are quoted, at the price quoted, de-
livered to Chesterfield Courthouse, Virginia.
NX4E OF BIDDER
ADDRZS.S
BY
DATE TITLE
/mc
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
C.G.kianuel PURCHASING DEPARTMENT Invitation # 64-25226-687
Purchasing Clerk CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
Sealed bids, subject to conditions and instructions contained herein and
on the reverse hereof will be received at the above office until, but not
later than 2:30 P.M., EDST, June 22, 1964, and then publicly opened and
read for furnishing automobiles to the County of Chesterfield per follow-
ing specifications:
w
Eighteen (18) each automobiles for Police Dept. as follows:
To be latest model Ford Custom, Chevrolet Biscayne or
equal models of other manufacturer, 2-door, V-8 models
with production model upholstery and trim.
Engine to be minimum 330 H.P. Police Special.
Transmission to be heavy Duty Cruisomatic Dual Range,
H.D. Powerglide or H.D. automatic transmission as
recommended in "equal models of other manufacture"
i4inimum wheelbase 119"
To be equipped as follows:
Heavy duty, extra cooling capacity radiator and fan
Heavy duty front and rear suspension
Extra heavy duty shock absorbers
Full flow oil filter
Heavy Duty brakes - furnish with bid detailed specifications
of brake to be furnished
Power brakes
5 ea. 15 inch heavy duty wheels with '670/15, 4 ply BSVI tires
60 amp. A.C. Alternator with built-in rectifier. Alternator
to have two -belt drive
Generator ammeter mounted on instrument panel
Heavy duty front seat and seat backs
Heavy duty front floor mat
Steering wheel horn ring
Right and left sun visors, padded
Right and left door arm rests
Front seat safety belts anchored to floor structure
(SAE approved)
Padded dash
Emergency brake light
Day & Night - Non -glare inside rear-view mirror
Fresh air heater and defroster (outside air)
IMPORTANT -- READ CAREFULLY .BEFORE' MAKING BID
CONDITIONS
1. Rigt: t is. re:aerve,d to waive informality in bids.
2. In case of error ip,, the e,xtensiov of pricW; -r! the bid, t;hµ -.snit
price shall.. gov.Qraf. ;
3. Award may be_made to the lowest resgonsible bidder prowsded that in
the selection of equipment or materi.a.ls a contract may be awarded
to a resp'otisible bidder other' than :the lowest in the inte. Est of
standardi.zatibn or when ult ri►ate economy is clearly evident.
4. Right iS. _�'eserved to reject i-any or all bids, or to award in part
or in whq dkfpl.
5- In case of 4pfault of the suocessful bidder,- orhe..:Iails to deliver
the supplies or services ordered within a reasonable time, the
Purc_iasing Department, after due notice (verbal �o,r,..iq writing) . ;may
procare them from other sources and ho1'd him responsible -,for any
r:
excess cast occa-sioned thereby.
6. Bids based on firm price or those including "downward escalator"
clause, may be given preference over,lower ones bearing an "escalator"
clause.
7. Bids making exceptions.to terms and conditions included in this
invitation' may be, considered, but preference may be given to th-ise
who do not make such exceptions.
8. Right is reserved to require the successful bidder to.fur.nish per-
formance bond yin.' the amount of the contract `before award of contract.
Tt is ur.)derstood-that should a bond be required, Chesterfield County
nay the premium for such bond. If no bond can be furnished
.,, fie successful..bidder, right is reserved to cancel the award and
,,card the contract to the next lowest,respons.ible bidder.
^ lids submitted shall have included,inI,pr3ce,the .cost of any
-usiness and professional licenses,.nermits, or fees required by the
County of Chesterfield.
10. All oida'must be signed in order to be considered.
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDER
1. Samples of items;. when ,re.gn.ired, shall be •furnished without` charge,
and if not destx;o.yed,,. s;tiall, upon i+equest,..-,be,,;returned at the bidder's
expense.'
2. Time of proposed delivery shall be stated in defin}ae teams.
3. Bnvolopes' 666tainri'rig bids shall be sealed and marked in the lower left
har,a corner with the invitation number, commodity classification
anc,,da;te. of opening of bids.
4, All bids shall be submitted exclusive of direct Federal, State and
Local Taxes. However,, if the bidder believes that certain taxes`'are
properly payable by Chesterfield County, he may list such taxes
separately in each case directly below .thp re-spectiye item bid price:.
A te:z; Ex'eimption-Certificate will be furnished upon request.
5. inhere a brand or trade name appears in the specifications, it is
undorstoodt that the brand or trade' name referred to, or its approved
aqua 1, shall be furnished. If, however, the bidder proposes similar
but,;3ot idppti.ca1. items;, he must furnish fulV particulars& If no
mention is made of any exceptions, it is assurnsd that he is bidding on
the-._rt_i.cle mentioned and not an approved equal", and fie wi Al be re-
quiryd to deliver the exact article specified.
:r The oidder crust sign the bid in ink or, indelible pencil. If the
bidd*r:'PfS •a firm or corporation, the bidder mu$t show, the title of. t.he,7..,;,
in0i)1t4dua!1 executing the bid.
7. If uliable to bid, please sign and return,'tti sY form by return mail,
advi3ing reason for not submitting quotation.
fir°
of
Sc��+E��
U [ WILLIAM OLD
WILLIAM R. SHELTON JUDGE �'��,. � y'
ERNEST P. GATES
CLERK O�TJn �r
COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY
CIRCUIT COURT
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
June 24, 1964
Mr. M. W. Burnett
Executive Secretary
Chesterfield County
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Mel:
Regarding your letter of June 23 concerning the status of
the public landing on property of the Virginia Electric and
Power Company at Dutch Gap, please be advised that the
County is leasing this property which contains 4.32 acres
from the Virginia Electric and Power Company on a year to
year basis for the rental of $1 a year. This lease is
automatically renewed from year to year unless the parties
each give the other at lease sixty days notice of its ter-
mination. The lease provides that the Board of Supervisors
by leasing this property does not abandon, release, or
extinguish or in any way give up any rights that it has in
the old Coxendale Road running from the re -location of such
road in an easterly direction from the portion of such road
abandoned and its new location to the James River as shown
on a plat made by Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation
dated August 30, 1942.
The agreement provides that the County would maintain the
area and provide parking facilities and keep the same in a
state of good repair. It is my opinion that the County has
not complied with its agreement. The parking area is not being
maintained and the public is not getting the maximum benefit
from the landing. I have requested the Commissioner of Game
and Inland Fisheries to construct a concrete boat landing
and have been advised that if the lease could be on a more
permanent basis, that is for a period of five or ten years,
then the Commission would feel that they could spend some
money for permanent improvements.
M
M
Mr. M. W. Burnett
June 24, 1964
Page 2
The County has maintained that the Power Company closed
a public road without its permission which cut the public's
right of ingress and egress to and from the James River.
Part of this road was closed when the new Power Company
facility was constructed on the James River and there are
records in the Supervisors Order Book No. 9 at pages 22 and
61 concerning the re -location of State Highway 615 and 617.
The landing facility was constructed by the Power Company
at its expense.
The lease is not recorded.
papers of the Board.
EPG:c
I assume a copy is filed with the
Very truly yours,
Ernest P. Gates
Commonwealth's Attorney
�of
Ott it
r
� O
N� C
WILLIAM R. SHELTONCLERK
b
CIRCUIT COURT
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
June 24, 1964
Mr. M. W. Burnett
Executive Secretary
County of Chesterfield
Chesterfield, Virginia
Dear Mel:
WILLIAM OLD
JUDGE
ERNEST P. GATES
COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY
I request an appropriation in the amount of $45
for the provision of Anne R. Cox as substitute
for Frances Smith who is on vacation the week
of June 22 through 26. One half of this amount
will be paid by the State, butin order for me
to receive approval from the State it is necessary
that the Board of Supervisors pass a resolution
authorizing this payment.
Very truly yours,
Ernest P. Gates
Commonwealth's Attorney
EPG: c
RE: SWIFT CREEK RESERVOIR
On motion of ���vi .✓ , seconded by
be it resolved that the Board
of Supervisors of Chesterfield County approves the draft of the
Agreement dated June 25, 1964, between the County of Chesterfield
and the Chesterfield Land and Timber Corporation for the right of
the County to acquire an easement to flood land of the Corporation
on Swift Creek and its tributaries upon the terms and conditions
therein; the Agreement of the developers of property between the
proposed Swift Creek Reservoir and State Route 711 to construct
a 16-inch water line as set forth in a letter of June 22, 1964,
upon its terms and conditions; and the Option Agreement for the
acquisition of the right to acquire permanent flood easements
from other landowners adjacent to Swift Creek and its tributaries
for the construction of such reservoir; and,
It Is Further Resolved, that the Chairman and the Clerk of this
Board are authorized to execute these contract documents on behalf
of the Board of Supervisors when the same have been approved'as to
form and contents by the County Engineer, the Executive Secretary,
and the Commonwealth's Attorney of this county; and,
It Is Further Resolved, that the Commonwealth's Attorney of this
County is authorized and requested on behalf of this Board to do
any and all acts necessary and proper to make effective this re-
solution and further to take the necessary action to obtain all
approval that may be required by law to use this area for a
source of water supply.
It Is Further Resolved, that the County Engineer and the Execu-
tive Secretary are authorized to negotiate with the landowners for
the acquisition of flood easements along Swift Creek and its tri-
butaries.
r-
n
CM
A giant stride in the development of Chesterfield
County was taken today.
The culmination of years of planning and negotiation
resulted in a resolution of '=greement between the Chesterfield
Land and Timber Corporation and the County of Chesterfield.
The Agreement is the first step in a mammoth project of clearing
over 2,000 acres of land and the impounding of Swift Creek to
form a reservoir of 5 billion gallons of water.
The plan calls for the initial construction in 1965
of a dam 27 feet high. Within three years the County may
raise the dam up to 20 feet higher to form a reservoir of
approximately 20 billion gallons of water. A filter plant will
be constructed also in 1965 at the site of Swift Creek and
Rt.360 and a 16-inch water line will be constructed northwardly
to the Bon Air area. A larger water main will be constructed
in 1966 from the new filter plant eastwardly along Rt.360 to
Turner Road to join the present water system in that area.
Mr. L. F. Powell,Sr. and his family have owned most
of the land for many years and have long cherished a dream of
a large lake at this site. The elder Mr. Powell, now 84 years
old, cut timber on this land over 50 years ago for his box
manufacturing plant, the David M. Lea Company. It is generally
conceded that this is the last site in the County where such
a facility could be constructed on an economical basis and
without flooding •any homes. There are only 6 parcels of
land yet to be acquired; however, it is hoped that much of this /4Nd
can be donated since the enhancement of the remainder will
more than offset the loss.
It is expected that at least 3500 acres of land will
be developed for high grade residential use. Adequate
planning of the entire area has been assured.
The Board of Supervisors expressed its warm appreciation
to the Powells for their cooperation in this development. Under
the terms of the ,Agreement the Chesterfield Land and Timber
Corporation, of which Mr. Angus Powell is the President, agrees
to clear the land to ground level at a cost in excess of $400,000,
The County will pay $100.00 per acre to the Corporation for the
land flooded initially which will amount to about $200,000.
County officials praised Mr. L. F. Powell for his
farsightedness. All agree that this project will have great
effect on the development of the County.
Through the cooperation of the County with the Powells,
Mr.C.E. Copley, Yx. T. G. Layfield, Jr., Mr. Fleetwood Garner
and the Salisbury Corporation, a 16-inch water main will be
constructed from Rt.360 to Robious Road, where it will boost the
supply to the mushrooming developments of this area. The dam
and filter plant will be constructed from current funds in the
Water Department. No tax money will be used for this project.
The total cost of the first phase of this development
will be approximately $1,700,000, most of which will be financed
over a three year period.
l
M
Clearing is expected to start immediately and will
be finished by early 1966 when construction is expected to
be completed on the dam and filter plant.
With this great new water expansion program underway
and with the rapidly developing supply of water from the
Appomattox Water authority, Chesterfield is planning well to
satisfy its water needs in the years to come.
With the wide acceptance of the ever expanding
County sewer system, the construction of many fine new schools
and the announcement of several new industrial plants locating
in the County, Chesterfield proves that it is moving forward.
,. For, Mr. M. W. D•lrnett
ter►
t *wv"
lw. y"s
0
t
s.
jv" 240 1.9"
{
� ..' m
w
""Y yaw$ R
I 0
*41W *0 10
✓( �re .ram. 7z -- �.z t R S",_ / 9G
�/. � �` rj es-+-+ /+� /�'� S / ��Y-.. �//"/�✓f �'.,,. �O cam'+ .
A/ /' 7` �o H /i7 !�`�.t, /j%✓. /7 -�i-say.. �-�-k -� f
All,
Al /
,�lye" ev C�lrlo.. M,4,�
D o rGo n Grv..i Ca.
,.0 It �-Io
��i / ✓ �v+- � 7`'�t /?mac-i-r-�s � i" / ✓ �%1%zk .G"� '
D
vh r K ��
-74 Ac4%-�kNII)o9j�e4A."�J,
le
Q prof' fl Vt p a a T /aCK c r K —
Q /l r lac
A�06,74-14,,4�
) /2/i
C3fl S'�! •1 .pc4
�-
Yvo Tt�'V%'&t C/
m
M
/ .1/9� 7/7 - )--c- 4 // // ..,