1987-03-25 PacketR
DATE: MARCH 25, 1987
H ESTERFIELD 160u* "Y
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
AGENDA
COURTHOUSE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HARRYG. DANIEL, CHAIRMAN
DALE DISTRICT
JESSE J. MAYES, VICE CHAIRMAN
MATOACA DISTRICT
G. H. APPLEGATE
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
R. GARLAND DODD
BERMUDA DISTRICT
JOAN GIRONE
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
RICHARD L. HEDRICK
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
TIME: 9:00 A.M.
Page
l.�-`IInvocation at 9:00 a.m.
Reverend Neil Myers
Elkhardt Baptist Church
2.L,--Vledge of Allegiance to the Flag
of the United States of America
3. Approval of Minutes
�-A March 11, 1987
,B'. March 18, 1987
4.,,-Grounty Administrator's Comments ....................... 1
5� ar'&' Committee Rep
orts
6 ?,- Requests to Postpone Action, Emergency
Additions or Changes in the Order of
Presentation
7. Resolutions and Special Recognitions
/AMrs. Virginia C. Gordon, Upon
`' Retirement as Chesterfield County
Registrar ......................................... 5
Reverend John E. Leonard,
Church of the Epiphany ............................ 7
8.,,,jl!�arings of Citizens on Unscheduled
Matters or Claims
9. Defer Items
W ublic Hearing to Consider
Guidelines Relating to Extension of
Utility Lines to Promote Economic
Development ....................................... 9
10. Public Hearings
• Consider Conveyance of 2.5 Acre
Parcel of Land at the Airport
Industrial Park to Mr. and Mrs.
George A. Kcraget................................. 12
M
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
Page 2
Page
11. New Business
A.�Change Orders and Funding for Data
Processing, Human Services and
Courts Buildings ..................................
15
B vuthorization to Proceed with
Airport Apron Expansion Project ...................
22
li,- Spointments......................................
24
D. Community Development Items
1. ve and Appropriate Funds
for Contract to
Extend Utilities on Reycan Road.. ...
35
' 2;o986-87 Rural Addition Projects...
38
3�,4irginia Department of Transportation
1987-88 Primary Allocation
Hearing ... ................. • • • • • • . • ..........
43
appropriation for Funding of
dewalks on Hopkins Road .....................
48
Resolution of Support for the
Route 10 Improvement Project
t ugh Chester ...............................
52
t
-- 6 ', hanges in State Secondary Road
Hopkins Beulah Roads............
56
�` ystem on and
E. Utilities Department Items
public Hearing to Consider Conveyance
of Right of Way on Turner Road ................
60
11
2:'�Position Authorization in
Accordance with the Utilities
Department Management Study ...................
62
3. Request for Public Water
in Stafford Place Subdivision .................
70
4. Consent Items
a.,,; Agreement with Virginia Department
of Transportation for Adjustment
of Utilities on Turner Road ............... 76
b.,-' Approval of Easement to
Vepco at Buford Road Water
Pumping Station ........................... 79
c .v"Acceptance of Deed of
Dedication Along Bundle Road
from Continental Land Sales, Inc.......... 82
board of Supervisors
Agenda
Page 3
Page
4. Cons t Items (continued)
d. Acceptance of Deed of
Dedication Along Warbro Road
from H. W. Blankenship and Sons,
c.......................................
85
e Y Request toEncroachonCounty
Easement from Mr. Nicholas J.
Mailo..................................... 88
��ports....................................... 91
F. Reports ........................................... 93
G. Meet with Model County Government Day Students
at11:30 a.m...................................... 108
H. Lunch - League of Women Voters at 12:00 noon
Magnolia Grange ........................... 109
I. Request for Mobile Home Permit at 2:00 p.m.
• 87SO48 - Ramesh C. Patel, Bermuda District
J. Requests for Rezoning
!ti 1. 86S145 - John E. Hamilton, Jr., Matoaca
District
!o 2. 86S158 - David A. Banty and George P.
Emerson, Jr., Bermuda District
A 3. 87SO08 - Colson and Colson Construction
Company, Midlothian District
4. 87SO09 - Frank L. Hereford, Midlothian
District
5. 87SO14 - Bexley West Associates, Clover
Hill District
6. 87SO15 - Arthur Pemberton, Midlothian
District
7. 87SO17 - R. Larry and Katie G. Turner,
Matoaca District
87SO18 - Breck Caine, Matoaca District
87SO19 - Clover Hill Corporation, Matoaca
District
f 1� 87SO21 - Sommerville Development Corporation,
V Midlothian District
87SO22 - Woodrow Waller, Bermuda District
\.,,12. 87SO23 - Brandon Development Corporation,
Clover Hill District
13. 87SO24 - Chesterfield Meadows Shopping Center
Associates, L.P., Matoaca District
14. 87SO25 - Cowles R. and Katherine Garrison,
Clover Hill District
M
Board of Supervisors
Agenda
Page 4
Page
J. Requests for Rezoning (continued)
15. 87SO26 - First Virginia Bank and Investors
Savings Bank, Matoaca District
16. 87SO33 - Sigma G. J. Associates/Petula
Associates, Limited, Midlothian
District
K. Dinner and Work Session with Social Services
Board at 5:00 p.m. - Magnolia Grange .............. 111
12. Adjournment
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
J AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER:
4.A.
SUBJECT:
ABIDCO - Introduction of New Director and Work Program
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Sean J. Vargyai has been hired by Crater Planning District Commis-
sion as Director of Economic Development. Sean is responsible for
the ABIDCO work program.
Sean was previously employed as a Marketing Manager with the
Virginia Department of Economic Development. He represented
Virginia to Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa,and Minnesota businesses.
In January, the ABIDCO Board of Directors adopted a three year work
program consisting of the following program areas.
1. Provide a regional information and intelligence system.
2. Provide regional promotion and marketing.
3. Serve as the vehicle for coordination within the region.
4. Provide selected regional, retention, financial, and special
programs.
5. Serve as a vehicle for grantsmanship.
PREPARED BY'
S nley R. Balderson, Jr.
irector of Economic
ATTACHMENTS: YES O NO ® Development
SIGNATURE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Board of Supervisors Agenda Item
Subject: ABIDCO - Introduction of New Director and Work Program
March 25, 1987
Page 2
Year 1
A. Information System
1. Basic demographic and labor force presentation.
2. Industry and business service directory.
3. Infrastructure and services presentation.
4. Industrial site brochure.
B. Intelligence System
Develop and put into place an intelligence network.
C. Regional Promotion and Marketing
1. Institutional marketing to specific agencies.
2. Private sector help to network Richmond area commercial
and industrial real estate firms.
3. Direct marketing will be modest and targeted at image
enhancement.
D. Regional Coordination
1. Share local and regional information, developments and
activities.
2. Arrange for needed resources.
3. Formulate strategy and action plans.
4. Review results.
E. Special Programs, Retention and Finance
1. Provide information to private sector about special
programs such as the Procurement Assistance Center.
2. Develop a close working relationship with the Crater
Development Company.
3. Develop a "private sector assistance network".
F. Grantsmanship
Establish a solid working relationship with the Crater Plan-
ning District Commission, which has primary involvement in
economic development grant programs.
Years 2 and 3
A. Information System
1. A quality of life documentation.
2. A "cost of doing business in the region" presentation.
00 *
Board of Supervisors Agenda Item
Subject: ABIDCO - Introduction of New Director and Work Program
March 25, 1987
Page 3
B. Intelligence System
Efforts should center upon maintaining and enhancing the
networking system.
C. Regional Promotion and Marketing
1. Institutional marketing programs will focus upon en-
hancing the programs previously established as well as
expanding the private sector networking, by establishing
an "ambassadors program".
2. Direct marketing programs will be developed based upon
available financial resources. A formal monitoring and
tracking system will be developed which provides for full
coordination with the local jurisdictions.
D. Regional Coordination
ABIDCO will explore mechanisms to enhance and build efforts
during the subsequent program years.
E. Special Programs, Retention and Finance
ABIDCO will develop a more focused outreach retention program
to educate the private sector that the local jurisdictions and
ABIDCO are ready, willing and capable of providing needed
assistance.
00 3
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE:__ March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: MODEL COUNTY GOVERNMENT DAY PREPARATION
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
4.B.
At the February 25, 1987 meeting of the Board of Supervisors,
arrangements were made to present Ms. Lee Chase and Alice Heffner,
Coordinators, and the students who will be participating in Model
County Government Day, May 6, 1987.
The Coordinators will outline the proposed program and the
students will introduce themselves as well as identify the position
they will be modeling on May 6th.
The Board also agreed to meet with the students who will be acting
as Board of Supervisors from 11:30 a.m. until noon.
Board Action Requested:
1. Present resolution adopted at last meeting on Model County
Government Day to Ms. Lee Chase.
2. Meet with students representing Board of Supervisors at 11:30 a.m.
PREPARED BZl"
Robert L. Masden
Assistant County
ATTACHMENTS: YES O NO IS Administrator for
Human Services
SIGNATURE
2941�=--
CbUN*tY ADMINISTRATOR
MEETING DATE:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
ITEM NUMBER: 7. A.
SUBJECT Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Virginia C. Gordon Upon Her
Retirement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION *-
Mrs. Virginia C. Gordon will retire from the Registrar's Office,
Chesterfield County, on April 1, 1987.
Virginia Gordon has provided 20 years of quality service to the
citizens of Chesterfield County; Chesterfield County and the
Board of Supervisors will miss Virginia Gordon's diligent service.
The Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mrs. Gordon and
extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield
County their appreciation for her service to the County.
A copy of the attached Resolution will be presented to Mrs. Gordon
and this Resolution will be permanently recorded among the
papers of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
ATTACHMENTS: YES
PREPARED BY:
Frederick W. Willis, r.
Director, Human Resource
NO ❑ Management
SIGNATURE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR �>D 5
M
L
R_�COGNIZING MRS. VIRGINIA C. GORDON
UPON HER RETIREMENT AS REGISTRAR
Whereas, Virginia C. Gordon will retire as Registrar from
the Registrar's office of Chesterfield County on April 1,
1987.
Whereas, Virginia Gordon was appointed by the State Electoral
Board in July 1967, and was made a General Registrar in 1969;
and
Whereas, Virginia Gordon provided twenty years of quality
service to the citizens of Chesterfield and the Commonwealth
of Virginia.
Whereas, Virginia Gordon was instrumental in the 1968 Richmond/
Chesterfield annexaticn process which required many long hours
of service to the residents of Chesterfield; and received
a letter from the Editor of the Richmond -Times Dispatch recog-
nizing her efforts; and
Whereas, Virginia Gordon was actively involved in the develop-
ment and installation of computer assisted registration and
precinct reporting, with an active roll of 81,223 registered
voters served by 40 voting precincts; and
Whereas, Virginia Gordon provided the leadership and direction
to establish a modern, efficient and effective Countywide
registration system; and
Whereas, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will deeply miss Virginia Gordon's diligent and dedicated
service.
Now, Therefore Be It Resolved, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Virginia C. Gordon
and extends on behalf of its members and citizens of Chester-
field County their appreciation for her service to the County.
And, Be It Further Resolved, that a copy of this resolution
be presented to Virginia C. Gordon and this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
00 6
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: 7. B.
SUBJECT Resolution Recognizing Reverend John E. Leonard for
Outstanding Community -Service
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Mr. Applegate has requested that the attached resolution
be adopted. Reverend Leonard will be present to accept the
resolution.
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: YES q NO O
SIGNATURE:
C6UF4TY ADMINISTRATOR
Q�
s
RECOGNIZING THE REVEREND JOHN E. LEONARD
WHEREAS, The Rev. John E. Leonard, founder of the Church of
the Epiphany in 1979 with 300 families, has provided the
leadership necessary to encourage the growth of the church to
1,500 families; and
WHEREAS, Father Leonard reached beyond his church by
negotiating the first spiritual covenant between Central Baptist
Church and Church of the Epiphany, and assisting in the
resettlement of more than 150 refugees in the area; and
WHEREAS, he is well-known to the young people in
Chesterfield through his church youth programs which minister to
more than 400 members, and further, that his services as a
baccalaureate speaker in the county high schools will be sorely
missed; and
WHEREAS, Father Leonard has served outside his parish for
two consecutive terms as president of the Diocesan Presbyteral,
the chief advisory body to Bishop Walter F. Sullivan, and is
serving a five-year post as consultor to the bishop; and has
acquired a reputation for being a key pastor in the
Diocese of Richmond which contains 131,000 members;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding services he has
provided in Chesterfield, not only in his religious community but
to the citizens of the county; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board congratulates him on
his new assignment as principal of Norfolk Catholic High School
and extends best wishes for another successful ministry.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
a
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: Guidelines Relating to the Extension of Utility
Lines to Promote Economic Development
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Mr. Dodd and other members of the Board of Supervisors have request-
ed the preparation of guidelines to further define Sections
20-1.31(c) and 20-1.44(c) of the County Code (see attached) relating
to the extension of utility lines which promote the economic
development of the County.
The following represent guidelines that the County recommends
utilizing in considering financial participation in the extension
of utility lines to encourage economic development:
a. The project developer agrees to match the County
contribution on a three -dollar County:one dollar developer
ratio;
b. The estimated increased property tax revenue above tax
revenue that would be received if the property developed
low density residentially will offset the County's cost
of utility extension within three (3) years of issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy;
Continued next page -
ATTACHMENTS: YES ® NO 13
PREPARED BY:
Richard Sale
Assistant County
Administrator/Development
SIGNATURE:
UNTY ADMINISTRATOR 00 a
Page Two - Extension of Utility Lines - Economic Development
c. The project developer agrees to post a performance bond
to repay County costs for utility extension if the proposed
industrial development does not occur as proposed within
two (2) years and resultant tax revenue does not occur
within three (3) years of issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy;
d. The eligible economic development users include all uses
permitted in the M-1, M-2 and M-3 zoning districts except
mobile homes and professional offices.
Staff met with representatives of the Chesterfield Business Council
to review the suggested guidelines and are expected to speak at
the Public Hearing. They did suggest deletion of reference to
tax revenue that would be received from residential development
in item "b" in order to simplify the formula. Specifically, they
recommended deletion of the underlined words,
"b. The estimated increased property tax revenue above tax
revenue that would be received if the property developed
low density residentially will offset the County's cost
of utility extension within three (3) years of issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy;"
Staff has no objection to this recommended change.
Recommendation: The Board of Supervisors approve the suggested
guidelines.
Attachment
In
Chapter 20. Utilities
Section 20-1.31(c)
In those limited circumstances where the extension of a
water line using county funds will promote the economic
development of the county and where it is not practical
for the properties to be served to fund all or a portion
of such extension costs, the county may agree to fund such
extensions upon terms and conditions imposed by the county.
Such extension should be calculated to result in tangible
and definable economic development within the county and
may not be used for extensions to serve new residential
growth or commercial growth that is likely to occur in
the absence of county funding. Any such extensions for
economic development must be added as a project to the
Utilities Capital Improvement Program.
Section 20-1.44(c)
In those limited circumstances where the extension of a
sewer line using county funds will promote the economic
development of the county and where it is not practical
for the properties to be served to fund all or a portion
of such extension costs, the county may agree to fund such
extensions upon terms and conditions imposed by the county.
Such extension should be calculated to result in tangible
and definable economic development within the county and
may not be used for extensions to serve new residential
growth or commercial growth that is likely to occur in
the absence of county funding. Any such extensions for
economic development must be added as a project to the
Utilities Capital Improvement Program.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
MEETING DATE:
ITEM NUMBER:
i
10.
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Conveyance of a Parcel of Land
in the Airport Industrial Park
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
Mr. and Mrs. George A. Kcraget desire to purchase a 2.5 acre +
parcel on the southwest corner of Virginia Pine Court at $25,006
per acre (see attached map). A purchase agreement has been pre-
pared and the County Administrator has been authorized to execute
the contract.
The Kcragets plan to construct a 10,500 square foot facility to be
used for custom cabinet and millwork manufacturer. The Company
will employ up to ten persons. Investment value is estimated at
$400,000.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve sale of this property to Mr. and Mrs. George A. Kcraget.
Attachment
AGI7MC5/dem
PREPARED BY'
Soey R Bal rson, Jr.
rector or
E nomic
eDevelopmen
ATTACHMENTS: YES IRC NO O
0012
SIGNATURE:
C UNTY ADMINISTRATOR
LL
iL �- 1s Gl
LL - i
W W � �v w ►�' w
�zCcL!3urCr v O
"fit `JowcLm"�i>_` 0
LT Li
a f
Q L jLLJ Q �.,. W W
W ¢,
�- Z U-I }tc�
� Q,-,-'
i, 3.
facc
c.
I
\mac, cc
��```�7,I ^^.� ;r t , �. � y- /��' � `� )'�,`` ' � .""'ems s �`/�►'` �
w fit, �, t O� - �- ��r ., > � � .„y. • 4 r
w
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
P.O. BOX40
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CHESTERFIELD,VIRGINIA 23832
((j
HARRY G. DANIEL, CHAIRMAN
(804) 748-1211
�Ir,aTe `
DALE DISTRICT
JESSE J. MAYES, VICE CHAIRMAN
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
MATOACA DISTRICT
RICHARD L. HEDRICK
G. H. APPLEGATE
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
R. GARLAND DODD
13ERMUDA DISTRICT
JOAN GIRONE
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
MEMORANDUM TO: Richmond News Leader
FROM: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
DATE: March 6, 1987
SUBJECT: Meetings, Coming Events
One
(1)
time,
Wednesday,
March
11,
1987
One
(1)
time,
Wednesday,
March
18,
1987
Please confirm by calling 784-1200.
�OAINS-EZAL, CL R
PUBLIC NOTICE
Take notice that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia, at a regular meeting on March 25, 1987 at 9:00 a.m. in
the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield,
Virginia, will hold a public hearing to consider the conveyance
of that certain tract of land containing 2.5 + acres located in
Dale Magisterial District of Chesterfield County, Virginia at
the Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park which
Parcel
the northwestern side of Virginia Pine Court a d ismorenfullon
y
shown outlined in red on a plat entitled "Revision of
Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park" prepared by J. K. Timmons
and Associates dated October 26, 1976.
Copies of the plat are on file in the County Administrator's
Office, Chesterfield, Virginia, and may be examined by all
interested persons between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday. ,
NOW
REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT OF PURCHASE, made this day of January,
1987, between THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, a political
subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("Seller") and GEORGE K.
KCRAGET AND NORMA J. KCRAGET, husband and wife ("Purchaser").
W I T N E S S E T H:
FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants hereinafter
entered into, the Seller hereby agrees to sell and the Purchaser hereby
agrees to purchase upon the terms and conditions herein set forth, the
following described real property:
All that certain tract or parcel of land containing 2.5
acres, more or less, located in the Dale Magisterial
District of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at the
Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park, which parcel
fronts on the northwestern side of Virginia Pine Court
and is more fully shown outlined in red on a plat
entitled "Revision of Chesterfield Airport Industrial
Park" prepared by J. K. Timmons and Associates,
dated October 26, 1976, a copy of which plat is
attached hereto and incorporated as a part hereof as
Attachment A.
This real estate purchase contract shall be subject to the following
terms and conditions:
1. The total purchase price for the above described parcel of real
property shall be TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000.00) per
acre, prorated on an acreage basis, times the number of acres determined
by a certified land surveyor acceptable to Seller. Such survey is to be
obtained at Purchaser's expense.
2. Subject to the conditions stated herein, the Seller shall convey
the above described parcel to the Purchaser by Special Warranty Deed with
1 . .
Richmond
Newspapers,Inc.
An Affiliate of Media General
. DATE
3/11
P.O. BOX C-32333
RICHMOND,VIRGINIA 23293-0001
804-649-6000
Co. of Chesterfield
Att: Joan Dolezal
Board of Supervisors
Chesterfield, Va. 23832
)EI DESCRIPTION
E Legal Notice
to po Industrial Park
which parcel fronts on the
northwestern side of Virginia Pine
Court and is more fully shown
outlined to red on a pplet entitled
revision of Chestertleld Airpport
Industrial Park' prrepared by T K.
Timmons
immo October d Associates dated
Copies of the plat are on file In the
County Administrtator's Office.
Chesterfield, Virpinto, and may be
examined
by ail interested ppar-
sons between the hours of 913
a.m. and S:oo p.m.. Monday,
thr2Slh_Fr_iday.
my
M
220806
DATE
3/18/87
RICHMOND NEVI SPAPERS, INC.
Publisher of
THE RICHMOND NEWS LEA ER
Richmond, Va.......... A... i .`.:,.
This is to certify that the attached ..............................................
was published in The Richmond News Leader, a newspaper ub-
lished in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia.
rh 7 I$o1 at I- "' I � 198
.......k...........�.................................................................
QhfTh first insertion being given ..................
ornfl,�A 71Meme
1 ' [�.................. .. .. ... ... . T'/
Notary Public GERALDINE JDNld
State of Virginia, City of Richmond: SUPERVISOR, ACCTS.
Y_23 �r7 TITLE
% CASH DISCOUNT IF PAID
OR BEFORE 15th OF THE SUCCEEDING MONT
NO DISCOUNT ALLOWED THEREAFTER.
-M�
*Ww
`0
T b c r o D r c, s � s ',21 n. b. rx
EVENINGS AND SUNDAY
15 FRANKLIN ST., PETERSBURG. VIRGINIA 23804
AD COPY
DATE: ri {:; ..> 2 5, ,g S' 1
ACCOUNT: -r,�,�
Dates Published: Me, r:r, i 1 , ► s' , 19 1
Inches -1 C ¢ per inch $ 7 1. 60
PUBLIC NOTICE
Take notice that the Board
of Supervisors of
Chesterfield _ County,
Virginia, at a regular
meeting on March 25, 1987
at 9 0o a.m. in the County
Board Room at
Chesterteld Courthouse,
Chesterfield, Virginia, will
hold 'a public hearing to
consider the conveyance
of that certain tract of
land containing 2.5 t acres
located to Dale Magisteri-
al District of Chesterfield
County; Virginian at .the
Chesterfield Airport In-
duWal rank which parcel
fronts on the northwestern
side of Virginia Pine Court
and is more fully shown
outlined in red on a plat
entitled "Revision of
Chesterfield Airport In-
dustrial Park" prepared
an
bAssociates datedJ.K. Timmo ns October
26,1976.
Copies of the plat are on
-:fgs in the County Ad-
ratorls Office,
erfield, Virginia, and
tnav be examined by all
(804) 732.3456
V�
MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
ITEM NUMBER: 11. A.
Change Orders and Funding for Data Processing, Human
Services and Courts Buildings
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION *-
This item:
a) Advises the Board of change orders to, the Data Processing
and Human Services buildings construction contracts and to
the Courts Building design contract.
b) Requests Board approval of those change orders over $10,000.
c) Requests approval of a contract to correct a drainage
problem between the Data Processing building and School
Administration and appropriation of funds for this project.
d) Requests appropriation of income from gain on sale of
investments over and above that appropriated on March 12,
1986.
Change Orders
Since the start of construction on the Data Processing and Human
Services Buildings and the final design of the Courts Building,
it has been necessary to initiate changes that will affect the
final cost of construction and/or design of these structures.
These changes are itemized on the attachments for each of the
l
PREPARED
William H. Howell, Director
General Services
ATTACHMENTS: YES'i� NO 0
SIGNATURE:
#el-
c6UNTY ADMINISTRATOR
M
M
Agenda Item -Change Orders and Funding
March 25, 1987
Page 2
three buildings. The changes to the
necessary to reflect the present size
Building (which were not included i
to include interior design services
included.
West Krause Road Drainage
n
Moseley Henning contract are
and scope of the new Courts
the original contract) and
which were not originally
In addition to the attached change orders, it became apparent
with the construction of the Data Processing Building that some
action must be taken to correct a long-standing drainage problem
on W. Krause Road between that building and School
Administration. That problem will be further aggravated due to
the Data Processing Building driveway and parking lot now
draining back to W. Krause Road.
An engineering study of this drainage problem conducted by
Baldwin and Gregg, Inc., resulted in recommendations and
specifications for a storm drain system to pipe the water to
Reedy Creek. Bids were received and opened on March 16, 1987
with Castle Equipment Incorporated the low bidder at $57,287.
This work needs to be done before paving of the Data Processing
Building driveway. It is requested that $65,000 be appropriated
to the Data Processing Building to allow for any contingencies on
the drainage project.
Lease Purchase Account Earnings
A total of $353,031 has been earned in investment earnings in the
lease purchase buildings account. Staff requests that the Board
appropriate $288,031 to the Human Services Building contingency
account to provide for an adequate construction contingency
account (6%) and for an installed mechanical file system for the
Social Services Department and $65,000 to the West Krause Road
Drainage Data Processing Building account to cover necessary
drainage improvements. Staff will request future appropriations
from interest earnings to the Courthouse Project account at a
later date prior to the construction (Fall, 1987) contract award.
0016
LMM
in
Agenda Item -Change Orders and Funding
March 25, 1987
Page 3
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors:
1) Approve of all change orders over $10,000 for the Data
Processing and Human Services buildings as outlined on the
attachments.
2) Authorize the County Administrator to accept low bid of
$57,287.60 and enter into a contract with Castle Equipment
Company for installation of a storm drainage system in the
vicinity of the Data Processing Building.
3) Approve change order #2 to the Moseley Henning Architectural
design contract in the amount of $134,148 for the new Courts
Building.
4) Appropriate investment earnings of $353,031 for the
following:
Human Services Building $288,031
Data Processing Building 65,000
TOTAL $353,031
0 0x 0V
ATTACHMENT 1
Agenda Item -Change Orders and Funding
March 25, 1987
CHANGE ORDERS - DATA PROCESSING BUILDING
Number
Description
Amount
1
Sprinkler System for the Computer Room
$
5,511
2
Repair soft areas in the drive entrance
to the new building
$
7,700
3
Extra floor panels for the Computer Room
$
451
4
Construct and install remote annunciator
panel in the Computer Room
$
3,456
5
Install coaxial data cable and face
brick escalator
$
7,742
6
Engineering services to Schanabel
Engineers, Inc.
$
4,992
*7
Group of changes at end of project
$10,780
Separate Contracts
* Install fiber optics line and communications for
Data Processing Building (AT&T) $22,982
TOTAL NET CHANGE $63,614
* Requires Board Approval
n
n
Agenda Item -Change Orders and Funding
March 25, 1987
ATTACHMENT 2
CHANGE ORDERS - HUMAN SERVICES BUILDING
Number
Description
Amount
1
Survey to install new cable, Va. Power
$ 1,000
2
Delete South entrance (Credit)
( 21,759)
3
Raise lower parking lot and lower
sanitary sewer
$ 8,087
4
Add CRT conduits in 14 rooms, furnish
corner stone and projection screens
$ 3,874
5
Convert room 643 to food stamp vault
$ 4,133
6
Revise layout of Dental Clinic
$ 9,261
7
Delete fence in lower parking lot
(Credit)
($ 5,040)
8
Revise and add water line for fire
suppression
$49,995
9
Credit for elevator cathodic protection
($ 1,200)
*10
Clean out Reedy Creek and install
culverts near gas line
$18,000
TOTAL NET CHANGE
$66,351
* Requires Board Approval
on19
ATTACHMENT 3
Agenda Item -Change Orders and Funding
March 25, 1987
*CHANGE ORDER - MOSELEY HENNING DESIGN CONTRACT -
NEW COURTS BUILDING
Number
Description
Amount
1
Final adjustment to Building footprint (Contract
included Square Foot Escalator) for Design
Total 139,628 Sq. Ft. (includes
Shell of 21,399 Sq. Ft.)
$ 42,784
2
Off -Site design work for the extension of
Lucy Corr Court Road
$ 25,994
3
Provide scale model and rendering for
$7,000 Vice $12,500 per the original
agreement (Credit)
($ 5,500)
4
To provide Topographic Survey for
20 acres Vice original 10 acres
$ 12,000
5
Correction from change order #1 (Credit)
($ 130)
6
To provide Interior Design Services
$ 59,000
TOTAL NET CHANGE
$134,148
* Requires Board Approval
Agenda Item -Construction Funds for Buildings
'March 25, 1987
Budget and Management Comments:
The original agenda item on March 25, 1987 appropriated
$19,120,737 of the $20,000,000 estimated cost to construct the
Data Processing, Human Services and Courts buildings and advised
the Board that future requests would be made to appropriate
interest earnings to bring the total to $20,000,000. This item
requests appropriation of $353,031 in investment earnings to
bring the total appropriation to date to $19,473,768. Additional
interest will be appropriated in the future as it is earned.
At the time bids were awarded, the Data Processing Building was
over budget by $237,893 and the contingency fund from the Human
Services Building was used to cover the shortfall. However,
subsequent changes, almost certainly some additional future
changes plus the Social Services file system requires restoration
of the Human Services contingency account. This requested
appropriation will bring the total appropriation for the Data
Processing and Human Services buildings to $6,758,478. This
action will provide funds to correct a drainage problem near the
Data Processing Building ($65,000), finance purchase of a file
system for Department of Social Services ($60,000) and restore
the contingency account for the Human Services Building
($228,031) to cover the known change orders plus any further
unanticipated changes.
Additional interest already earned plus that expected during the
design and construction of the Courts building and Human Services
buildings are projected to be adequate to bring the total funds
to the original projection of $20,000,000 plus the $65,000 for
the Data Processing drainage project and the $60,000 for the
Social Services file system.
This action requires the Board of Supervisors to appropriate
$288,031 to restore the Human Services contingency of $228,031
and provide $60,000 for the Social Services file system and
appropriate $65,000 to correct a drainage problem at Data
Processing.
J"dget
es J. tegmaie Director
anWManagement Department
01)117.1%. 7
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: ll.B.
SUBJECT:
Airport Apron Expansion Project #04
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This item requests Board authority to submit Federal Aviation
Administration "FAA" and State grant applications, enter into necessary
contracts and appropriate matching funds for the 1987 Airport
Improvement Project Apron Expansion.
The County has received notice that the Federal Aviation Administration
has approved $350,100 for this year as the Airport Improvement Program
#04, Airport Apron Expansion Project. This will require a 5% County
match of $19,450 along with a State match of the same amount. The
FAA is also authorizing the use of $72,700 unexpended from last year's
overlay project which includes previously appropriated County and
State matching funds. Therefore, the 1987 project will total $461,700
which will allow the Airport to double its present apron and tie down
capacity.
Recommendation:
1. Authorize the County Administrator to execute the contract with
Delta Associates previously selected as engineers.
PREPARED BY;
ATTACHMENTS: YES ® NO ❑
William H. Howell
Director of General Services
SIGNATURE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OD�V
r
Y �
Page 2
March 25, 1987
2. Authorize the County Administrator to solicit bids for the project
and to enter into a contract with the lowest responsive and re-
sponsible bidder.
3. Authorize the County Administrator to submit an application for
Federal and State funds and enter into a contract with the Federal
and State government for the expenditure of said funds.
4. Appropriate the Federal ($350,100), State ($19,450) and County
($19,450) funds for the Apron Expansion Project with the local
share to come from the Airport Industrial Park account and authorize
--he application of $72,700 unexpended funds from the #03 project
to the Apron expansion. Total funds for the project is $461,700.
Budget and Management Comments:
Appropriation of grant funds is automatic with approval of the
grant. The Board action required is to appropriate $19,450
from the Airport Industrial Park Reserve account. The present
balance in the account is $195,997.
�JAm- es J. Stecj6aier, Director
L/Budget & Management Department
00z3
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETINGDATE:-March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO THE. YOUTH SERVICES COMMISSION,,
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
4 -
11.C.1.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Youth Services Commission requests that the Board of Supervisors
nominate 4 new members to the Youth Services Commission. There are
vacancies in the following districts:
Clover Hill
1 adult member
Matoaca
1 adult member
1 adult member
Midlothian
1 adult member
ATTACHMENTS: YES O NO
To fill the remainder of a 3 year term which
expires June 30, 1989
To fill the remainder of a 3 year term which
expires June 30, 1989
To fill the remainder of a 4 year term which
expires June 30, 1990
To fill the remainder of a 3 year term which
expires June 30, 1989
PREWED BY: A;)?
Alice Heffner
Director, Office on Youth
SIGNATURE :
C NTY ADMINISTRATOR Go'?,
MA
CHESTERFIELD YOUTH SERVICES COMMISSION
Bermuda District
Mrs. Melissa Ball
6139 Strathmore Road
Richmond, VA 23234
Term expires: `6/30/90
271-4560 - Home
Mr. F. Gibbons Sloan, III
Thomas Dale High School
12003 North Enon Church Road
Chester, VA 23831
Term expires: 6/30/87
541-8143 - Home
Ms. Sarah Gregory
9111 Omaha Street
Richmond, VA 23237
Term expires: 6/30/90
275-5806 - Home
Dale District
Mr. Samuel T. Tarry
Lloyd C. Bird High School
10930 Cherry Bark Road
Richmond, VA 23237
Term expires: 6/30/87
748-9592 - Home
Mrs. Nancy Hudson
4406 Pano Court
Richmond, VA 23237
Term expires: 6/30/90
271-1421 - Home
Ms. Amy Goodman
Meaaowbrook High School
4137 Carafe Drive
Richmond, VA 23234
Term expires: 6/30/87
271-0080 - Home
Mr. Joe Cesario
5218 Verlinda Drive
Richmond, VA 23237
Term expires: 6/30/90
748-2170 - Home
274-6307 - Work
-118a- 19
0,00.
M
n
Clover Hill District
Ms. Betty Parker
1908 Williamstowne Drive
Richmond, VA 23235
Term expires: 6/30/90
745-3368 - Home
Mrs. Artyn Gardner
3410 Walkers Ferry Road
Midlothian, VA 23113
Term expires: 6/30/89
744-2365 - Home
Ms. Jennifer Dvorak
Clover Hill High School
3524 Markey Road
Midlothian, VA 23113
Term expires: 6/30/87
744-2061 - Home
Ms. Holly Ford
7816 Lake Forest Drive
Richmond, VA 23235
Term expires: 6/30/87
745-0647 - Home
i Matoaca District
Ms. Ann Hicks
15508 Silvertree Court
Colonial Heights, VA 23834
Term expires: 6/36/fl9
526-0818 - Home
246-5511 - Business
748-8157 - Business (Ext. 243)
Ms. Kahlisia Pettus
20801 Brickhouse Drive
Petersburg, VA 23803
Term expires: 6/30/87
520-1262 - Home
Ms. Kimberly Willis
20008 Roosevelt Avenue
Colonial Heights, VA 23834
Term expires: 6/30/90
526-0268 - Home
254-6000 - Business
-1-18b-
00p6
Midlothian District
1 Ms. Carol Boisineau, Chairman
1509 Sandgate Road
Midlothian, VA 23113
Term expires: 6/30/90
794-6309 - Home
Ms. Dorothy Biringer
12210 Wilsinger Lane
Midlothian, VA 23113 it/
Term expires: 6/30/89
794-3573 - Home
Mr. Rob Wade
10561 Ashburn Road
Richmond, VA 23235
Term expires: 6/30/87
272-3870 - Home
Ms. Erin Kelly
Monacan High School
1191 Sunflower Lane
Richmond, VA 23236
Term expires: 6/30/87
794-0290 - Home
-118c-
0OZ7
ial ; ): r
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY1,
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
P.O. BOX 40
HARRYG. DANIEL, CHAIRMAN
CHESTERFIELD,VIRGINIA 23832
DALE DISTRICT
(804) 748-1211
yRGtN�'
JESSE J. MAYES, VICE CHAIRMAN
MATOACA DISTRICT
G. H. APPLEGATE
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
R. GARLAND DODD
RICHARD L. HENDRICK
BERMUDA DISTRICT
JOAN GIRONE
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
March 14, 1987
Ms. Alice Heffner, Director
Youth Services Commission
Chesterfield County
P. 0. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Dear Ms. Heffner:
Thank you for your letter of March 5th informing me
of the resignations of Mrs. Hicks and Moss Willis. Mrs. Lois
McClellan (526-3698) and Mrs. Barbara W. Jernigan (526-7956) &
(786-3554) have agreed to serve on the Youth Services Commis-
sion; and I will recommend them to the Board at the next
meeting. Feel free to contact and meet with the appointees.
Please call me if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Jesse J. Mayes
Vice Chairman
cc: Richard L. Hedrick �
Robert L. Masden
0 0z's
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
t
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: ll.C.2.
SUBJECT: Appointments to the Keep Chesterfield County Clean Corporation
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: '
The terms of appointment of the following members of th Keep Chesterfield
County Clean Corporation expired on January 31, 1987.
Mr. Warren Dieterich - Midlothian District
P. 0. Box 35122
Bon Air, Va. 23235
Mrs. Marilyn Kim - Bermuda District
2660 Blithe Drive
Chester, Va. 23831
Mr. William Harris - Matoaca District
6201 Claypoint Road
Chesterfield, Va. 23832
Mrs. Alma Smith - Dale District
9621 Lori Road
Chesterfield, Va. 23832
Mrs. Ann Belsha - Clover Hill District
5708 N. Chase Court
Midlothian, Va. 23113
PREPARED BY'
(continued)
ATTACHMENTS: YES 49 NO ❑
SIGNATURE: On�9
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
M
M
. .0 ,continued)
Summary of Information
Each member has done an
board and are interested
January 31, 1987 through
outstanding job in serving on the corporation
in reappointments. The new terms are effective
January 31, 1988.
O F40
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: 11. C. 3.
SUBJECT:
Select Membership for Economic Advisory Council
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
BACKGROUND
In January 1986, the Board of Supervisors adopted an Economic
Development Program. A salient portion of the Program directed
creation of an Economic Advisory Council. It is the purpose of
this Council to provide:
1.
Advice and
recommendations on further development of the
Program.
2.
Service as
ambassadors to interact
with Economic Develop-
ment clients and prospects.
3
Assistance
in influencing
and lobbying for positions
which enhance Chesterfield's
economic well-being.
4.
Serve as
a conduit/source
for generating prospective
businesses
and industries.
PREPARED BY:
St ley R. al rson, Jr.
irectoX of Economic
ATTACHMENTS: YES W NO O Development
SIGNATURE: �4
CO TY ADMINISTRATO' Q031
n
.
En
Board of Supervisors Agenda Item
SUBJECT: Select Membership for Economic Advisory Council
March 25, 1987
Page 2
The Economic Development Department has drafted suggested objec-
tives, strategies and initial actions for the Council (see at-
tached). It is now time to solicit Council membership.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
It is planned that the Advisory Council consist of eleven (11)
members, constituted in the following manner:
t }"
1. Industrial Development Authority - 1 member
2. Assistant County Administrator/Development - 1 membe
3. Community Business Executives - 9 members
eddy... c
RECOMMENDATION
Request the following groups select their representative member(s).
Industrial Development Authority - 1 member
Attachment
AGI7MC3/de
41U3Z
11 ,
1
u
u
u
00
ami u
d
m
d
u
W
0
ouo 41 q
.�
44)
w
w
-y 0
cd u W
A
. i sr
0 0o
u w
-Li V4m
o
0 O
+�
0
�
•4 d
41
W 1+
0 m W
m cd
41 3
a1
m
CO w
u
d O
q
U 1a m
p
0 d
m
d 41 p
d
W , + a1
0
0 u a1
-v -rt m
o m 0
41
,� w
14 O 1+
�
10,
p u
O
>
Q! 41
Q- 41
d
> W 0o
a.+
-r1
U
m
cd O + 1
•l7 1; W
41 u 41 9!
P. W
•d 41
41 41
m
a1
1+
u a 1
o -H
14 W 1: O
V f3
W m ,-1
1~ W 0
•
W
.0
.d
> ,.►
O
o
m cd
r ( 1+
P. a1 V4
41
0 C1 41
0
41
-r1 V4 0
41
m
0o w r-i
u m P.
m p aj
CO
m
4.1 W
m r. a1
q 1+ 0
W
u
cd
-u
4s 3 U
vi
1: o m
a 0 0
m o a W
a.+
%-�
...,
a 04
0
a
-o
m
cd >,
d
-rt Y1
44 0 $4
W
.. W o
1+ a 0
m
m p
d p
1+ 0
O o
r-1 c7 .-1
W
41
-rt
u
3
0
ri m 01 d
m 00 > 1:
0o
Cd
d
41 m 00
m 0 W
.r+ a
m *0 u P.
r-1
a/ 0 O
41
W P. w
41 O w
m
-H
P.
O
•rl
v1 Cd -A w
a
m 0 a
a1 1: 0 W
.0 > w
10 .o
.n o o
> >
-A
41
-rl
i1
00.X 41 O
.M
u
t
t3 m
O d r-1
g u 0 f♦
G 13
9 1-4
a1 a m
m
14
W
.c
u
m u W"
W
W
m m
m 0o O O
d V4 •�
A
W u
93
a1 a1 m
E3 > V
A O A
r-1
m
W
a
m
d
ri W .-t 41
a m d
a
w
o -H •
3 >,
m 0 m a1
-r4 w
0 3
u m
41
a1 m 4
u 41 u
1+
O
p. -r1
41
O
41 m 41 a
>, w
-r1 m
u r-1
0 rq A 00
-H W rl
r4
.-♦
-o
o 3 00
1;
m 0 0
3 r-4 sa
,a d f? -0
-r+
m -r4
A. u
d -r1 -r1
P. u u r-I
Ef
O O
-rl
u
-H
u
W
1-1 a1 N u
al
10
41 :3 :3 t1
a1 .c 41 W
" gg
U 41 o
0 13 0>
m 1~
m 1~ -H x
p O 0
1:
G
m
a1 -r1 A 1~
m
W
Vq u O 43
co U
V4 a
0
0
0
>> w o
H
o
-00 4 6W0
0 00 -U O
0 0 0 10+
H o
10a 0 +�1
uu � u
AV4 OUP.
Pa
�-d ��
04 Ei6w
U s1W p.P.0
p.0 �.c
W+-IW
U
U
W
ad .n
u
u 0 +1 0
to 41 3 A
cd :G u
Cd
W
04
d
d
.-1
oa
�
w
m
0
a
41
1
-d
U
a1
1+
u 1 00
u
1 1+
al >, w�
41
41
m
1+ m W
4 w O
3 9-1
P.
40 u.1
w41
U
cd m•o
mb o
m0 q
a
u
aO.1A u-
ci
0
u
m V Cd
G a1 m
rml 0 W td
$4 Cd
�-.�
a
0)
O
N
1+
a4
U
NwO
H
H
0O
of
.
co <% u
,
a! W m W-q
,O
0 41
41u
to co 0
00ti1 H
O
0
.c
41
.-d t1 V:
m -H
0. m
11 m W
u tV10
" d
60
-r1
Cd
0 0
044
W 00 CO H
-� u t3 4-1
U
1..1
-rl
m
a1
0
C'+ U
O a1 � d
s1 W a1 r-1
P. - O
.co
ix+
-r1
W
ai u w
m m
. a a1 u
O O Wcd
P4
p
14
vi 0 .0 -
41 m
W m -r1 a1
-H • -l7
O -r1 O G
m -0 V4m
1+ .o 9-4
P.
al w
14w
r
U
b
u
U
.G
.c
p U
N N
y1
W ar 11
W
W
-r1
0 0
o p
41 O
v4 Cd CO
-r! N
.0 an d
41 O r-i
a 41 ;3
-rl
a m r
0 0 41 1+
o 0 w
•-
O o 41 W
-a u >
3 m +i
,1 m o
u a
1+
a
aw1*�
0 00 3>
d w a11+
-#4 co
u v�
V1
1s6
W o w
V U O
.-4
uCd u
W
A
> u> .
41
7 -
W
w K
r 1
a
a
U a1 00 u
1+ 41d
A 3 W 0.44
0 -1
+1 r-1
a o w
H
H
, l
A a >J v1
to3
w
Q
d
.�
oa
N
w
ra
44
u
o .
o �
o u
U �
�
0
U
co
O
1+
-rl O
m -o
a -
1~ 4-1
0
m
41
u
Cd 4-1
b
u
CC) W
d
U .01
1J
.0
U
41
>
vi
N m
m JJ 11
N W A
0
cd
U
mW 41 10
O
O
1-u!
0 W
V -H
r.
W
dC14
OJ
W 4J
0iw1
W W 4)
"�
0
d 3"
A
m as
0033
m
O
-H
u
u
d
m
m
44
ba
a.+
m
14
41
07
1
`
°u 0
1
m.°
wg4)a
0wQ.m
a�i
�
m'
m-1
Ou A
0 14 ,
C)
Hu
4w04)
N
aY 41 $4
0�
1460g0
°u 14
m 0cq 0
a.k
cmo 0
u r-I :3
m
P. m W
a4J
0 d+°+ci
a0
iJ Q m w
$4
1+ (j 00 14
u
O u O
Cl Yt Ir O
C
'r1 0 V4 4-1
C-141`40w0w44)
$4
.0
P� u > oo
U
0,0
cp
.0
u
U
u m
I~ x
m •d a�
Cl. m 93 41
0 co
mo1�O00
A 0 .o 4J
,u aum10
0 P 0 0
03m0$4
wmO�
m 41 0 �
.0 C 14 Cd
41 0 m to
3 41 Kd m W
m N +f 00 1+
-rt N > 0 00
>w0Cd0
mmla4$4
aAwuw
U
V m
C3 m
Cd O
m
m m
v +t
> u
a 03
O
m �
V O >,
,-I u si
> u g:
O :3
N V� .0
P4 O U
u +�
14 CO
.Y1-1 w 41 114
m
'd ad u m m m P.
0 m V v y
r�1 �10 m • cCo aid 0 td O
1+ .-t m 9+ m '0 +•I • 'd
-4 0 w 0 m m a 0 m�
uw++C)"I"amo0CA
00�mmm��aui>,
OO sJ $4 1J
W d V � L3.♦i W N 0
V4 rq O u 'r1 O> ++ Q O m
s.+ ,-I u u 14 .-i r-1 1+ m U $4
d u m A. ,,i > m0 P. m m m
H 'md 44 0 14 'r4 w u >
N
U '
1~
O
1
ti-I
9
,� a1 u
ra
3 H
d
m m P.
ti•I
m > O
m
u
u 0.
u Cd
60
C
0 d a
O C ad
w
O L, S%
m
u ra Ai
a�7 U
41
cd
w
d
O .0
9a41�
N
U
: w
u
9
O
0
41
m 0
V.>
0
u
0 O
u 1+
V
0 p
m0>,'a
am
ucd
m
03
Cd Pal
d ai
0
4Cd
m
PO.
gmuHOO
m
wo
��A
3
m m 4j
om0o
> a.+ 3
as
0 >
000
m
0
w
0
$4
b
V4
O
W 0
b>
41
ca
i O 41
0
N �r1 0
W�
C?
m
a0
0�°
p
0 d
o d
0 0.
0
0 u
0
O
W
.0
a�0 O�(U
W
v�
C4
U
cd > -rl
m ri
w V:a
'C: O
m 0vi
r( V4
O � u
a 0 3
of
U
N
u
nn.q&
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
ll.D.1.
MEETING DATE: March 290 19R7 ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT:
Appropriate and Approve Construction Contract to Extend
Utilities
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
A 2.8 acre tract on the east side of Reycan Road has been conveyed
to Berkness Corporation (see attached map). County water must be
extended to the property. The low bid cost of extension of the
water line is $19,879.65.
After utilities have been extended, 12 acres of Airpark property in
addition to the Berkness site will open for development.
It is County policy to provide utilities to the sites sold in the
Airport Industrial Park. It is also policy to appropriate funds
for utility improvements from the proceeds of land sales in the
Airpark.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve construction contract.
2. Appropriate $21,870 (contract and 10% contingency) from
Airpark reserve fund to provide water line extension, and
transfer funds to Department of Utilities for project manage-
ment.
AGI7MCl/dem
PREPARED BY.
S nley R. alderson, Jr.
irector of Economic
ATTACHMENTS: YES ® NO 0 Development
SIGNATURE: �AD�MIN_ISTFRATORCOUNT
N"5l"�M,••A,!'`i L'�r' .r`7+ i}'` � i%�(, �� r..7.1,` r� � �r r 1't.•�'�.L .t .Vr•} tir �.`J'. 1'. !.' .•4 � i,' ,' , - , ,• •• .r. •'� !.i.'r •:+• t .
vt
ti 539 29
N 50°30'57"E ,10,00'
L-39,ZT T-Z5.00'
', SO' R�^'��5 'ET��hAR•('J�NRRouvD ESmT----------- � �;-•'��: �'� �'� �
N 39°Z9'03"W,10.0Cc
0s / ,��.•
Ns
AL
op
\ Ar90 •CS.O 9 • . � .
qe
V. _
'� ao
<q'
EW T. 70' R/W W D.B. 1524 PCB. 355
REYCAN ROAD
0
N 50' 3 ' 57" E 350.00
ro. EA T
P.B. 2 Pa% 63
8
h
W O O O S
3 2.812 ACRES
p = 122,500 Sp. FT. RM lr1
av LM
•
M
2
S 50. 30' 57" W 350.00'
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
350.00. TO W/L 4F
e—"WNTmw Goan ucr4
STATE ROUTE 701
W
0
PL A T SHO WING 2.8I2. A CRES ON THE
SOUTH LINE OF REYCAN ROAD --
"CHESTERFIELD AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL.
PARK:
1+
DALE DISTRICT * CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA
MEETING DATE
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT.' VDOT 1987-88 Primary Allocation Hearing
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
11.D.3.
The Board is requested to approve the attached statement
regarding Chesterfield County's primary road construction needs.
BACKGROUND:
The Virginia Department of Transportation will conduct a public
hearing on March 27, 1987 at 10:00 a.m. at the Richmond District
Office to consider input relative to the allocation of
construction funds and updating of the six year improvement
program for the interstate, primary, and urban systems. Several
primary projects are of vital concern to the County and should be
presented at the hearing.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Chairman of the Board present the
attached statement at the preallocation hearing.
PREPARED BY: �c
R J. McCracken
Director of Transportation
ATTACHMENTS: YES ® NO ❑
SIGNATURE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
0043
%Aw `410
VDOT 1987-88 PRIMARY ALLOCATION HEARING
MARCH 27, 1987
I AM HARRY DANIEL, CHAIRMAN OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR GIVING US THE
OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR BEFORE YOU TO OUTLINE CHESTERFIELD'S
PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION NEEDS. FOR THE FIRST TIME IN
MANY YEARS, WE CAN LOOK TO THE FUTURE WITH NEW HOPE. THE HIGHWAY
PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN NEEDED FOR SO LONG WILL FINALLY BE
ADDRESSED. YOUR SUPPORT FOR THE WIDENING OF ROUTE 60, THE
WIDENING OF ROUTE 10, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROUTE 36 GRADE
SEPARATION PROJECT IS VERY MUCH APPRECIATED.
I WOULD LIKE TO BRIEFLY DISCUSS THREE OF OUR MOST IMPORTANT
NEEDS. THE FIRST, IS THE COMPLETION OF ROUTE 288 FROM ROUTE 360
TO I-95. WE HAVE AT THE LOCAL LEVEL PROVIDED $30 MILLION FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE SECTION FROM ROUTE 360 TO ROUTE 10.
INTERCHANGES AT FIVE FORKS AND ROUTE 10 MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE
PROJECT. IF THE INTERCHANGES ARE NOT CONSTRUCTED NOW, THEY WILL
HAVE TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A VERY SHORT TIME AND THE COST WILL
BE TWICE AS MUCH AS IT IS TODAY. FUNDS FOR THE ROUTE 10
INTERCHANGE SHOULD BE PROVIDED FROM THE RICHMOND-PETERSBURG
TURNPIKE TOLLS, IF THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, PRIMARY FUNDS SHOULD BE
PROVIDED.
SECONDLY, A MEADOWVILLE ROAD INTERCHANGE ON I-295 MUST BE
CONSTRUCTED. THIS INTERCHANGE IS VITAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR
0014
m
m
INDUSTRIAL BASE IN THE EASTERN SECTION OF THE COUNTY, OUR STAFF
HAS WORKED WITH YOUR STAFF ON THIS ISSUE FOR SEVERAL MONTHS.
FUNDING FOR THE ECONOMIC STUDY MUST BE PROVIDED SO THAT THE
INTERCHANGE CAN BE APPROVED. FURTHER DELAYS WILL ELIMINATE OUR
ABILITY TO PROPERLY PLAN THE AREA.
FINALLY, THE I-895 CONNECTION BETWEEN CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY AND
I-295 SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED TO COMPLETE A CRITICAL LINK IN THE
REGION'S TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. THIS CONNECTION WILL PROVIDE
BETTER ACCESS TO RICHMOND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FOR OUR CITIZENS
AND WILL HELP PROMOTE OUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS, WE ASK
THAT YOU ACCELERATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE.
AGAIN, WE APPRECIATE YOUR PAST SUPPORT.
ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
IPA
1 WILL BE GLAD TO
004,5
1W
A
J
W W
(n
O
1--4(n
OY
(D
O
1—
LL O
tO w
M
W 2
M
N
Z
L�
LL
O
HI
O
O cn
C9
W =
>
_ >
ALL
LLJ
�
��
2
UV
W
v =
W
LLI
CL
-j�0w
O W
h
W ,HH
ac�Qcn
W
�
O
z
8
i
�O
z
W
=
ODD
(.Orr)
N
U
LLJ
ww
A�v
,..,
CLHH
>
a
=�
O
E3A0
W
_=
O00
w
000
U
��
0L
U
U
=0e-
p
8
CL
w
3
CO F—
fO
Q.
A
Cl)
cn
(n
(n
Q
=
pq
W V— O
y==w
a
H
a
(n =
wC�
cn
w
w
w
w
w
CD
0=��
o:
z=
Qw
z
Q
z
Q
z
Q
z
Q
z
Q
O
V= O
CL
V
JZ
J
J
J
J
J
O
LU
L
-- .-,
�-
tD
�-
Z
� z w
A
L
8
¢OZ�
v
Q
v
00
}
CL
vwC�
W
°O
N
A
I-
a-
WHWA
Q
Q
LLJ
O
LL
O
Ww� Q
W
H
H
a
V
W
N
ce.aa�^
O
O
O
(n
=
ZY=0^
Z
O
00
V
3.QWJ0
w
W
i—
OO.aJ�-+
0
J
W
W
LLI
JF-
0
-
-UU"1 E
LL
CDOLL
CL
0=
0=
a=
U
3O WCVCV
W
= OCD44-b9
r�
O
r- i
N
M
LI1
CD
OL
004
Vi
LL
O
N
W
Q
CL
W
\
J
L()
W
J
O
00
J
c.0
I
Q W
>
M
0
Z
F-ILr)
�
N
X as
Q
L
N
W
I
I
►-�
0 cn
U O
W
0
I
P--r
C-D
A
W
000
W
A
z
Q
=
W
N
=
w
}
W
to
IZ
Lf1
a)
=
W
Ln
F-
Z
d
O W
�-+
Q'1
N
3
O
m
►L
_
to U
U
I
O
Cl-
O
cr_l
►.-�
U _
U
Y
CL.
Z
wz
LLJ
�
3
�z
wz
p
¢ .-q
z z
z
I
a t-+
¢ �--�
00 Q
zw
O— W
O
¢O
= �--+
¢
=
LL
0
zz
W
z�
W
,00=
W N Z
(n
G.
WmW
w
Ucn
Wz
U
W
I
W
z
W
�-+z
F- Ww
►�wa.W-
w
z
�-»
z—z
,_,
z
LLI �
.-r
= F- CL W
Q
JWC7
J
F-
F-
C7
w0
Wz
WU'
wZ
30—=
00=F-
-I
N
wz
�W
_-r
zx
z
CC
a_W
CL.W
CLCY,UO
l0
A
�
z
Ln
go
N
>
J
�
3
A
ora,A
\
I
\
Y
Z
O
w
WX0
Q
�--� W
\(D
W
J
Q
0
7
] O W
Ln =
00 z
CI-O
m
L (n
O
0E-J
F-1-.
M
WW
M<
N=
►-j
>
00
N
Wt-,
CV
00w
0� w
W CL
W W
O
W
— Z
W
F- ►-�
A O
F- �-+
H W
F-
A
Q
F-
= W
3 F-
F-
_
co
�-+ CL
D_ Z
O
� W
¢
C4 Q Q
C� v
� ►-+
g
C�
to GCl
Q
!�
DO
Q1
O
CLI
O
t0
M
W
F-
O
w
Ln
r-H
w
L L-
,
O
M
H-Lr)
O �
O I
F- A
Q zQ
(n
W e-i
CD
= O
W
F-
z A
►-� ¢
U)=
w
�w
J H
U Cn
z =
U
F-
U
W O
)r--i
0
Ww
0_ F-
00=
N
L.0 Y
O O
= LL
W
F-
O
Z
on4�
REVISED
MARCH 24, 1987
VDOT 1987-88 PRIMARY ALLOCATION HEARING
MARCH 27, 1987
I AM HARRY DANIEL, CHAIRMAN OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR GIVING US THE
OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR BEFORE YOU TO OUTLINE CHESTERFIELD'S
PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE CONSTRUCTION NEEDS. WITH THE CONSTRUCTION
OF THE POWHITE PARKWAY, HUGUENOT ROAD AND THE HULL STREET ROAD
INTERCHANGE UNDERWAY AND THE UPCOMING ADVERTISEMENT OF ROUTE 288
AND THE MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE PROJECTS, WE CAN FINALLY SEE SOME
PROGRESS BEING MADE TOWARD SOLVING OUR TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS.
EVEN WITH THESE COMMITTED PROJECTS, WE STILL HAVE SEVERAL
PROJECTS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED,
I WILL SUBMIT FOR THE RECORD THE COUNTY'S PRIORITY LIST FOR
HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS. ALL OF THESE PROJECTS NEED IMMEDIATE
ATTENTION.
I WOULD LIKE TO BRIEFLY CALL YOUR ATTENTION TO THREE OF OUR
MOST IMPORTANT NEEDS. THE COMPLETION OF ROUTE 288 FROM ROUTE 360
TO I-95 IS THE COUNTY'S TOP PRIORITY PROJECT. THE COUNTY HAS
PROVIDED $30 MILLION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SECTION FROM
ROUTE 360 TO ROUTE 10. INTERCHANGES AT FIVE FORKS AND ROUTE 10
MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT. THE LEGISLATION WHICH PERMITTED
THE EXTENSION OF TOLL COLLECTIONS ON I-95 SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED
ROUTE 288 FROM ROUTE 360 TO I-95 AS ONE OF THE PROJECTS TO BE
FUNDED FROM THESE TOLLS, ALL OF THE OTHER PROJECTS IDENTIFIED
ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. SINCE
CHESTERFIELD ON ITS OWN HAS PROVIDED APPROXIMATELY ONE HALF OF
THE FUNDING FOR ROUTE 288, WE THINK IT REASONABLE FOR THE
DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE FUNDING, AS ORIGINALLY AGREED, TO INSURE
THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROUTE 288 AS A FOUR LANE FACILITY WITH
INTERCHANGES AT FIVE FORKS AND ROUTE 10. THESE FUNDS SHOULD COME
FROM THE TURNPIKE TOLLS. IF THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, PRIMARY FUNDS
SHOULD BE PROVIDED.
THE SECOND PROJECT THAT I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS IS THE
MEADOWVILLE ROAD INTERCHANGE. THE CONSTRUCTION OF I-295 HAS
GENERATED A GREAT DEAL OF INTEREST IN DEVELOPMENT OF THE EASTERN
SECTION OF CHESTERFIELD. AN INTERCHANGE IS DESPERATELY NEEDED AT
MEADOWVILLE ROAD TO ACCOMMODATE THE TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE
GENERATED FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE INTERCHANGE HAS THE FULL
SUPPORT OF OUR CONGRESSIONAL AND STATE DELEGATIONS. IT WILL
PROMOTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE REGION.
FUNDING FOR THE ECONOMIC STUDY REQUIRED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT MUST BE PROVIDED SO THAT THE INTERCHANGE CAN BE
CONSTRUCTED. FURTHER DELAYS WILL ELIMINATE OUR OPPORTUNITY TO
PROPERLY PLAN THE AREA.
THE MOST SIGNIFICANT UNADDRESSED NEED IN THE REGION IS THE
I-895 CONNECTION BETWEEN CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY AND I-295, THIS
PROJECT WILL COMPLETE A CRITICAL LINK IN THE REGIONS
-2-
m
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK PROVIDING BETTER ACCESS TO RICHMOND
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FOR OUR CITIZENS. THE PROJECT HAS BEEN
ENDORSED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF BOTH CHESTERFIELD AND
HENRICO, THE RICHMOND REGIONAL METROPOLITAN PLANNING
ORGANIZATION AND PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION, AND THE CAPITAL
REGION AIRPORT COMMISSION, CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT MUST
OCCUR SOONER THAN YOUR CURRENT SIX YEAR PLAN INDICATES.
FINALLY, WE APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT FOR THE WIDENING OF
ROUTE 10 AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROUTE 36 GRADE SEPARATION
PROJECT, THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION ON THESE ROADS GETS WORSE EACH
DAY, WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THESE PROJECTS ADVANCED IN YOUR SIX
YEAR PLAN. I WILL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS,
-3-
t\
00
M
r-lN
•LL
-' O
CN
(W r-I
-+U W
WCD
QQ
z
LLJ
C.�
�Q
O
Z }}
O
O W F-
J f•-
F-
!--
F-
�- F-
H
C
A
Z z
N*l
=
O O
ifi
Z
W
W
W
vJJ
AA
A
�
�
}¢LLJ
}
W
W
W O
N
=
AA
A
Q
¢
¢LL
LLJ
V =
O
•- (n
O Y
W O Z
Lfl
O
F-
LL =
tD w
C= O w
Kl
r-i
O
w O
r-I
Kl 0
LLI
LL
W
W
W
FW- H
w
W
C- CD Q (n
OI
F-
F-Lf1
=
(n X
F-
F- W
F-
O
=a)
0
W=
O
=>
AgmC:w
=
x0
O
0►-�
WZaU
A (ii x
(n
►-� C9
F-
LU
f3A0
W
C�Qw2
O
w
z
0C0E-
Q
O
U
Q
O
pqA
MO
�IY1
C�K1 U
AC.
O
w
A
w
W
W O w
W
Q:
a
w W
►-+
a_
F-
w W
A z W �
(n
U-
CL
F- F-
>
a_
(n
F- F-
�wF-0
O
=
0
►-,
W
==
cn===
a
x
00
w
=
x
00
z CD �
0
U
a=
fZ
U
U
a=
OCo
=
u= o
a
„-I
W w
W
w
a: z CD w
a:
z
CD
¢0zF-
¢0
z
►-" a =
r-a
, Q
cn (n x O
cn
F-
0 x
(n
(n
(n
(n
(n
F- z U=
F-
C-
w u
w
w
w
w
w
uwa_
v
mw
z
z
z
z
z
WF-wA
W
QW
¢
Q
Q
Q
Q
n X F- Z
n
V
J H
_l
J
_l
J
J
OWZQ
O
O
z
C'
w
W
zr
tD
a >-
a
A
a --
C7 3 <t Z -
C7
ZY=0—
z
w z — Z
00
Oda.J-
O
CN0
A
J C_ J
J
Q
JW- J
J
W
O
O F- x -
O
F-
F-
LL U Lf) M:
LL
u
x� -
wo
w
W 30CNN
W
OC
00
O
2 0CD4416?
1-1xW
O
CD
O
O
!2
I0
NO
CD
0
C'_
F-
x
►-�
W
W
w
W
F�
�
Cr
U
F--
O
r--I
N
M
Lf1
Cfl
F--1
0:
a.
m
m
,LL
�O
AN
(W=N
U L1J
O
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
F-
C9
FQ-
FQ-
lQ-
FQ-
H
IQ-
FQ-
IQ-
EQ-
1Q
Z
N
V)
N
Cn
C)
Cn
C)
N
Cn
LL
Ix
N
N
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
L L
LL
LL
U -
LL
W
Lfl
w
J
C7
�
00
J
o--4
CO
I
Q W
>
In
�-,
A z
3
O
,
�
L)
Ln
OAW�O
W
�
Lo
F-I
CT
Cn
N
m
CD
CN
rn
o
W
O
W
.-,
►r
�-,
U o
M:
CO
W -
F- Lh
}
= CT)
Y
�~
A
F- A
¢
CL
00
A
Z LL
x
00
►-,
O
W
CI-4?3
W W
F-
w
H
W
CD
CL
Ln
W
z
0_
Z W
L.LI
F- (n
=
CL
Lf)
CJ1
2
a
=w
3
rn
N
3
rn
0-4
x=
O=
O
=
1
I
O
O
1
O
x
UO
(n U
IZ
U
•-•
�-,
tl
o---I
U
U
CL
W
>-CO
W
W
¢�Q
Z
o:z
O
0
3
wz
wz
,�
O
O
Q '-"
Z Z
Z
I
Q '-'
Q '"~
00 Q
fn
►-�
Zw
QO
Q
LL
Zw
Zw
,00x
w
F-
O ►-+ W
W
O
= o-+
x
O
1-+ W
►-+ W
W N z
(n
Cl 0:
CL
Wmw
W
W
Ucn
U
1
MW
MW
F- ww
W
OW
Z - Z
Z
z
w Z
W
z
z
►-+ W CL =
Z
J F-
< -j 0-+
Q
¢
WQ
W
0_W
Q
U(n
U
J W CD
J
J
F- 0-
F-
CO
W 0
W 0
3= - x
.J
Z W
to
=Z
ZX
Z
►-+
wZ
wZ
oOxF-
l-+2
- r1 w
Lo
►-� w
►-�
rZ w
w
a. rr c� o
U
A
F-
�
U ,
=
WO
w
3
rn
xw
W
Y
pQ
CV
}
a- I-
Q-'
Q
Lfl
1
Q
=
0-4
Q
J
Q1
►--+
3
A
ao O
= A
CL
\
I
\
Y
Z
00 cx�
V
w ¢
M:
--� W
W
x
=
N
W
WXO
f
Q
\U7
J
Q
O
,
> O=
Q
Ln x
00 z
J
00
CL Z
00
N
o
W (n
O
O H J
=
07 Z
00 <C
►-+
00
O
00
(n
UO
F-- Y
�'
F- ►-+
Z
00 W
N x
>
N
w --4
CV
ob w
IY1
= w
CL
w¢Q
W
Cl.
U
3
F-(n
w
00
OMW
a
Wa
Ww
O
W
z
w
F-►-•
w
=w
A o
(L
F-
F- W
A
F-
x W
F-
x w
F-
►� CL A
= x
= F-
Q
=
3 F-
=
C7 w
wCL
=
0U
Oz
w
O
ox
O
�-"¢
o
-�
as ¢ ¢
cl- w
�
w
O
1�
00
co
cr
CD
rii
CN
tf1
zir
Lf)
F-
�-+
r+i
r H
r+i
r+i
r+i
r-H
C7
IY
(n
C7
r--i
CV
Nl
_-:r
Lfi
CO
Z
0_
r-i
r-i
r-1
r-1
r-i
ri
r-i
15
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER: ll. D. 2 .
SUBJECT: 1986-87 Rural Addition Projects
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board is requested to appropriate funding for the Nestor Road
and Treely Road rural addition projects.
BACKGROUND:
On January 28, 1987, the Board instructed staff to review and
develop more detailed cost estimates for the proposed Nestor Road
and Treely Road rural addition projects.
Nestor Road:
The project will cost approximately $30,000. ($5,000 County
cost for right-of-way, $25,000 VDOT cost for construction).
The County may have to use condemnation to obtain a drainage
easement for the project. The County must also obtain permission
from Pocohontas State Park to construct an outfall ditch across
Park property. If the Park is unable to grant this permission,
the project will not satisfy VDOT standards and would have to be
cancelled.
(Continued on Page Two) P
c
PREPARED BY: _
R J. McCracken
Director of Transportation
ATTACHMENTS: YES 0 NO 0
SIGNATURE: A%* 4438
—/ -COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
I
Board Agenda Item
March 11, 1987
1986-87 Rural Addition Projects
Page Two
Treely Road:
The project will cost approximately $188,000 ($48,000 County cost
for design, right-of-way, and utility adjustments; $140,000 for
VDOT construction cost). Right-of-way and utility adjustment
costs could increase or decrease significantly depending upon the
final design of the project. Condemnation may be required for
drainage and utility easements.
The developer of Greenbriar Subdivision is required, through
tentative subdivision conditions, to upgrade approximately 300
feet of Treely Road. The rural addition project excludes this
section (see attachment). If the developer does not proceed with
this project, an unimproved section of Treely may still exist.
VDOT policy restricts the use of their funds to the actual
construction of rural additions. VDOT has approximately $177,000
currently designated for rural additions.
In the past, the Board has chosen to provide funding for design,
right-of-way acquisition, and utility adjustments on rural
additions. Funding for the projects has usually been provided
from the General Fund Reserve.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends the Board appropriate $5,000 from the General
Fund Reserve for the Nestor Road rural addition project. Staff
also recommends that the Board appropriate $48,000 from the
General Fund Reserve for the Treely Road rural addition project.
0039
I O �
n O a
W
Lorn
s
CTI
�t
INCLUDED IN
RURAL -ADDITION
\�- PROJECT
Ln
c ' !Q
ui
if
I ... � Off. N !/ � l !f.•
my •,�. �
ti
o a
u t
N
V
W
C
N
a ,
7
i
i
I
r]
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: Sidewalks - Hopkins Road
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
11.D.4.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board is requested to appropriate funding for the
construction of sidewalks on Hopkins Road.
BACKGROUND:
In August of 1986, staff requested the Board to appropriate
funding for the construction of sidewalks on Hopkins Road. The
Board directed staff to advise VDOT to proceed with the design of
the Hopkins Road project with sidewalks and requested that the
matter be brought back to the Board after VDOT conducted a public
hearing on the project.
On January -5, 1987, VDOT held a public hearing on the Hopkins
Road project. The design presented at the hearing included
sidewalks on both sides of Hopkins Road. VDOT has now asked if
the County wishes to pursue the sidewalk construction.
VDOT policy requires the County to acquire any additional
right-of-way needed for sidewalks and to pay one-half of the
construction costs. VDOT has estimated the right-of-way for the
sidewalk on both sides of Hopkins will cost $22,800 and the
(Continued on Page Two) C
PREPARED BY:
R. J. McCracken
Director of Transportation
ATTACHMENTS: YES ® NO ❑
SIGNATURE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 06P¢'8
J-
.. �W
M
Board Agenda Item
Sidewalks - Hopkins Road
March 25, 1987
Page Two
County share of the construction
County contribution of $77,550.
is low and that $100,000 will be
sidewalks.
cost will be $54,750 for a total
Staff feels that VDOT's estimate
needed in order to construct the
Conditions throughout the County have generally not warranted the
installation of sidewalks. However, the combination of the four
laning of Hopkins, the high traffic volumes anticipated on
Hopkins, and the adjoining elementary schools, churches, shopping
centers, and community recreation association make Hopkins Road a
somewhat unique situation in which sidewalk should be considered.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The Board could advise VDOT that the County does not wish to
include sidewalk on the project.
y �2 The Board could advise VDOT that the County desires to have
sidewalk included on only one side of Hopkins. If this
action is taken, $50,000 should be appropriated for the
construction of the sidewalk.
3. The Board could advise VDOT that the County desires to have
sidewalk included on both sides of Hopkins. If this action
is taken, $100,000 should be appropriated for the
construction of the sidewalk.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached resolution
requesting VDOT to include the sidewalks on both sides of Hopkins
Road and that $100,000 be appropriated for the project
($71,510.52 to be transferred from the completed Iron Bridge
Recreational Access project, $24,680.72 to be transferred from
the completed Manchester High School access project and $3,808.76
appropriated from the Dale District Three Cent Road fund). The
County Administrator should be authorized to take all actions
necessary to have the sidewalk constructed.
DISTRICT: Dale.
0n1f9
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY: At the
regular meeting of the Board
of Supervisors held at the
Courthouse on March 25, 1987
at 7:00 p.m.
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has
conducted a public hearing on the Hopkins Road widening project,
and
WHEREAS, the project's current design includes sidewalks on
both sides of the road, and
WHEREAS, the combination of
pedestrian traffic between the
churches, shopping centers, and
creates a unique situation
considered, and
the widening of Hopkins and the
adjoining elementary schools,
community recreation association
wherein sidewalks should be
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has asked
the County if it desires to have sidewalks included in the
Hopkins project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
include sidewalk on both sides of Hopkins Road from Meadowdale
Boulevard to Beulah Road also connecting with the existing
sidewalk on Beulah Road near Beulah Elementary School.
Vote:
Certified By:
Joan S. Dolezal, Clerk
to the Board of Supervisors
• 2 l+�lC.
1 !
CCL.0 3T-' ; I 1 1
C
T>� HOPKINS El �.
R / �f�r SCHOOL
Q \ \
I
it'll/+►''+`,+ �I a ,
0
11111 I+�� F
M OR' u
`ORCa
/1
/
MEADOWDALE SHOPPING G TE
...........
1
- 11111/1111111 /`111't 1/ /, I
J
C
y I
i
awMwCCO
� ,
0 1 M Ro.
t^ p
•PANG c
' A
Ja
Ct�P CT S is
9 0
v CT. V 5 p
9 PANG � T
Gy SP u
C o
\ e— '♦� BEULAH RECREATION BEULAH ELEM.
ASSOCIATION INC. ; SCHOOL
Hopkins Road BEULAH UNITED `
�1 I.
Widening / Sidewalk '� METHODIST
�" 1
Project ���'���"'�'"���''����'" � CHURCH
C H
� A
a�
sea' gall 494444l_14 111,;
�CHESTER TOWN
ST AUGUSTINE'S CATHOLIC
ASSOCIATES
CHURCH���
n
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987
SUBJECT: Route 10 Through Chester
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
�Ly
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
ITEM NUMBER:
11.D.5.
The Board is requested to approve the attached statement
supporting the Route 10 improvement project through Chester.
BACKGROUND•
In October 1984, the Board appropriated funds for the design of
the improvement of Route 10 through Chester. The County entered
into a contract with VDOT to accomplish this design. VDOT has
scheduled a location and design public hearing for the project on
March 31, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at Thomas Dale High School.
During the design process, VDOT considered several alternatives
for improving Route 10. A "no build" alternative was considered
but was judged unacceptable because of poor Levels of Service
expected on Route 10. Three bypass alternatives were rejected
because not enough traffic would be diverted from Route 10
to achieve acceptable Levels of Service. Minor improvements to
Route 10 such as turn lanes, signal modification, etc. were also
rejected because Levels of Service would not be significantly
improved.
c
(Continued on Page Two) PREPARED BY.-
R41J,. McCracken
Director of Transportation
ATTACHMENTS: YES 91 NO ❑
SIGNATURE: 0052
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
en
Board Agenda Item
Route 10 Through Chester
March 25, 1987
Page Two
VDOT will present two build alternatives at the public hearing.
One alternative is the "through town" option of widening existing
Route 10 to four lanes with a median. The second alternative is
to make Route 10 a one way street system from Lee Street to
Winfree Street with the remaining section of Route 10 widened to
four lanes with a median. VDOT conducted two informational
meetings on these proposed designs. Public reaction to the
proposals has generally been positive.
Both alternatives will provide basically the same Level of
Service. The through town alignment will cost approximately $6.8
million. The one way system will cost approximately $7.4
million. Two businesses will be displaced with the through town
option. Four businesses and one residence will be displaced with
the one way system.
Staff supports both alternatives. The through town alternative
is preferred because it encroaches less into the residential
areas and requires fewer businesses to be displaced. VDOT should
be requested to consider the following revisions to the current
designs:
• Landscaping and street lights should be included in the
project.
• Overhead utilities that are to be relocated should be placed
underground.
• Consideration should be given to noise mitigation at the
Chester Intermediate School.
• The design of Route 10 near the Post Office should be
reviewed to insure that measures are taken to minimize
congestion resulting from turn movements at the Post Office.
• Traffic signal should be included at Osborne Road. All
signals should accommodate pedestrian crossings.
RECONNEMATION :
Staff recommends that the Chairman present the attached statement
at the public hearing.
DISTRICT: Bermuda.
'"o
PUBLIC HEARING STATEMENT
ROUTE 10 THROUGH CHESTER
MARCH 31, 1987
I AM HARRY DANIEL, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY. ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD, IT IS MY PLEASURE
TO APPEAR BEFORE YOU TONIGHT TO EXPRESS OUR SUPPORT FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF ROUTE 10 THROUGH CHESTER.
THE CONCEPT OF THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED FORMALLY AND
INFORMALLY SINCE THE LATE 1970's. CONGESTION HAS CONTINUALLY
GROWN WORST OVER THE YEARS. TRAFFIC NOW MOVES AT A SNAIL'S PACE
DURING PEAK HOURS. WE ARE ELATED THAT THE TIME HAS FINALLY COME
WHEN ALL THE PAST PLANNING AND DISCUSSION CAN NOW BE CONVERTED
INTO ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. THE BOARD SUPPORTS THE CONSTRUCTION OF
EITHER THE THROUGH TOWN ALIGNMENT OR THE ONE WAY PAIR SYSTEM.
THE THROUGH TOWN ALIGNMENT APPEARS TO BE MORE ECONOMICAL AND LESS
DISRUPTIVE TO THE COMMUNITY AND MAY BE THE BETTER ALTERNATIVE.
WE HOPE, THAT AFTER HEARING THE CITIZENS INPUT TONIGHT, YOU WILL
BE ABLE TO OBTAIN A CLEAR PREFERENCE FOR AN ALTERNATIVE SO THAT
YOU MAY PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.
REGARDLESS OF THE ALTERNATIVE SELECTED, SEVERAL ASPECTS OF
THE DESIGN SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED. I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THOSE
WITH YOU BRIEFLY. LANDSCAPING AND SMALL SCALE STREET LIGHTS
4)054
• *fte
*4000
SHOULD BE INCLUDED AS A PART OF THE PROJECT. OVERHEAD UTILITIES
THAT ARE RELOCATED SHOULD BE REPLACED UNDERGROUND, WE KNOW THAT
THESE REQUESTS WILL INCREASE THE COST OF THE PROJECT. HOWEVER,
WE FEEL THAT THEY ARE NEEDED TO MAKE THE PROJECT COMPATIBLE WITH
THE VILLAGE SETTING OF CHESTER. NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES FOR
THE CHESTER INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL SHOULD ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE
PROJECT.
FINALLY, WE FEEL THAT THE TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT OSBORNE ROAD
AND OLD CENTRALIA ROAD JUSTIFY THE INSTALLATION OF A SIGNAL AT
THIS TIME. WE ASK THAT THESE SIGNALS BE MADE A PART OF THE
PROJECT, CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN FOR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC AT
ALL SIGNALIZED LOCATIONS.
AGAIN, WE ARE ELATED THAT SOMETHING IS FINALLY GOING TO BE
DONE TO RELIEVE THE CONGESTION IN CHESTER. WE ASK THAT YOU
PROCEED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLAN
PREFERRED BY THE CITIZENS HERE TONIGHT. IF YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS, I WILL BE GLAD TO TRY TO ANSWER.
-2-
M
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25 1987 ll.D.6.
MEETING DATE: � ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: Changes in the State Secondary Road System
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board is requested to approve the abandonment,
discontinuance, and addition of certain sections of Beulah and
Hopkins Road.
BACKGROUND:
The Beulah/Hopkins intersection revenue sharing project has
recently been completed. As a result of the road realignment,
changes should be made in VDOT's Secondary Road System. These
changes include: 1) abandonment of 0.04 mile of Beulah Road,
2) discontinuance of 0.49 mile of the old location for Beulah and
Hopkins Roads, and addition of 0.51 mile of the new locations for
Beulah and Hopkins Roads into the State Highway System (see
attached map).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached resolution
approving changes to the Secondary Road System.
DISTRICT: Dale.
C /
PREPARED BY:
Yirector
J. McCracken
of Transportation
ATTACHMENTS: YES ® NO 0
SIGNATURE: (0056
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Chesterfield County: At a regular
meeting of the Board of
Supervisors, held at the Courthouse
on , at 10:00 a.m.
On motion of , seconded by
the Board adopted the following resolution:
Whereas, Hopkins Road, Route 637, from 0.14 mile south of
Beulah Road, Route 641, to 0.09 mile north of the south
intersection with Beulah Road, Route 641 and Beulah Road, Route
641 from 0.08 mile west of Hopkins Road, Route 637, to 0.02 mile
east of Hopkins Road, Route 637, have been altered, and new roads
have been constructed and approved by the State Highway
Commissioner, which new roads serve the same citizens as the road
so altered; and
Whereas, certain sections of these new roads follow new
locations, due to the relocation and construction on Hopkins
Road, Route 637, State Project 0637-020-237, M-502.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that Beulah Road, Route 641,
of the old location from 0.01 mile east of Hopkins Road, Route
637, to 0.05 mile east of Hopkins Road, Route 637, a total
distance of 0.04 mile, be and the same hereby is, abandoned as a
public road persuant to Section 33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia
of 1976, as amended.
And further, that the State Highway Commission be requested
to take the necessary action to discontinue Beulah Road, Route
641, of the old loaction, 0.08 mile west of Hopkins Road, Route
637, and Beulah Road, Route 641, of the old location, from
Hopkins Road, Route 637 to 0.01 mile east of Hopkins Road, Route
637 and Beulah Road, Route 641, from 0.05 mile east of Hopkins
Road, Route 637, to 0.21 mile east of Hopkins Road, Route 637,
and Hopkins Road, Route 637, of the old locaiton, from 0.15 mile
south of the west intersection of Beulah Road, Route 641, to 0.09
mile north of the west intersection of Beulah Road, Route 641, a
total distance of 0.49 mile, as a part of the secondary road
system of State Highways as provided in Section 33.1-150 of the
Code of Virginia of 1976, as amended.
And further, that Hopkins Road, Route 637, of the new
location, from 0.11 mile south of Beulah Road, Route 641, to 0.11
mile north of Beulah Road, Route 641, and Beulah Road, Route 641
from 0.06 mile west of Hopkins Road, Route 637, to 0.23 mile east
of Hopkins Road, Route 637, a total distance of 0.51 mile be and
hereby is added to the secondary system of the State Highways,
persuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia of 1976, as
amended.
Ayes:
m
CHANGES IN BEULAH RD. AND HOPKINS RD. DUE TO RELOCATION
AND CONSTRUCTION OF ROUTE 641, PROJECT 0637-020-237, M-502
(9 ,1058
m
S
w
r �
2
o m
2
V
�
W y W
O
41
�
z a
O
D O Q
-Z 2 cc� W O
3
Q
Z C
f
nt
d Q
2 O W m
S
7
0
u m
e
fl o
° p
O
R1
c
°U 0
0 0 2 O
J
loc o
C Q W 1
UJ
inZZu
O IL O O
Q
I
0 0 O o r z
F-
5
0
2 z '2 c ao
C
O o 2[ H
= v
U
u c>
u, u, w u, O m
w
T
W
�
�
r
Lu
N
Q
Z
v
2
a
LJ
--
dl
2
cr
O:
in ul
e CO
3 0�:
=ca
U 05
w �
v
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
MEETING DATE: ITEM NUMBER:
11.E.1.
SUBJECT UTILITY PUBLIC HEARING: Conveyance of Right of
Way
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
A Public Hearing has been advertised for March 25,
1987, at 9:00 a.m. to consider the conveyance of a parcel of
land to the Virginia Department of Transportation along
Turner Road. This conveyance is being made in conjunction
with the Turner Road improvement project.
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman
of the Board and County Administrator to execute the deed to
the Virginia Department of Transportation.
District: Clover Hill
Recommend Approval
PREPARED BY: �J /`�'
ATTACHMENTS: YES ❑ NO ❑
SIGNATURE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
ij N
N 1wui=� ft9 —_ N O
W
n N
N
a O
_ O �
ODf
Z •_
D
O
U
a
N
^ c
J In N rc
W;
N
W
U4
Z
u O U
O Z
W lu-
� s'
N 11
(f) q 11 V
W
_
U
It
11 11
LL w d 1 n
u
Q � i 1 629 11
J '— 1 626 11
Z 7 a 11 � 11
U' n
lU 11 L
„ L 11 ou
� CLI V 111 OOt
• h 1 909
COP $
92a
D94 was y 39
912 ayy'!tl F 9o9 •
oo► �
a�
20z ;
W • Yo
• ve -_ ,Df
r
90i z a �
u o
s
2 0
Q
N
i
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
MEETING DATE.
ITEM NUMBER: 11 E.2.
SUBJECT Position Authorization in Accordance with the
Utilities Department Management Study
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board is requested to authorize the following
positions:
1. Assistant Director for Finance/Administration
2. Principal Utilities Engineer
3. Financial/Rate Analyst
The above positions are a direct recommendation of the
Utilities Department Management Study and are needed to
implement the Study recommendations. Attached is a proposed
schedule for implementing all of the Study's recommendations
as well as a status report on implementation.
These positions can be funded for the remainder of FY87
within the current budget allocations.
(Continued on next page)
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: YES ® NO ❑
SIGNATURE: 0 n
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR �iZ
M
In
Agenda Item
March 25, 1987
Page 2
The Utility Management Study recommended a significant
change in management philosophy/approach from a highly
centralized management and decision -making style to an
approach that includes more delegation and team management.
In order to strengthen the Department's management capacity
and effectiveness, LWFW recommended a modification to the
Utilities organizational structure whereby a third division,
Finance and Administration, would be created and would be
administered by an additional Assistant Director of
Utilities (see chart).
The proposed Division of Finance and Administration
would incorporate the existing Billing and Accounting unit
and would be responsible for finance, rate analysis, capital
and operating budget coordination and control, contract
financial administration, customer billing, customer
service, customer accounting, and meter reading. To
implement this recommendation, the position of Assistant
Director of Finance and Administration needs to be created.
In addition, a Financial/Rate Analyst position is
recommended to provide analytical support to the proposed
Division.
LWFW, Inc. also recommended strengthening the
Department's longer range utility planning through the
creation and staffing of a Planning Section within the
Engineering Division. The Planning Section would be
responsible for anticipating and planning for the County's
water and sewer needs well into the future. The Planning
section should work closely with the County's Departments of
Planning and Economic Development in updating and
implementing the County's land use plan and in supporting
the County's economic development activities. This section
would also assist the development community by providing
information on water and sewer availability and/or
facilities required.
The creation and staffing of these positions (Assistant
Director for Finance/Administration, Financial/Rate Analyst
and Principal Utilities Engineer) will provide the staff
resources necessary to reorganize the Department in a format
more conducive to a management approach that includes more
delegation and team management.
Board Action Required: Staff recommends that
of Supervisors
implementation
Study.
authorize the positions described
of the recommendations of the
the Board
above for
Management
r)()1;3
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY UTUJTIES DEPARTMENT
I Operations & I
Maintenance
I Assistant Director I
PROPOSED ORGANIZATION CHART
Chesterfield County
Utilities Department
I DIRECTOR I
Finance &
Administration
Assistant Director
Billing &
Accounting
I Utilities Controller I
I Engineering & `
Administration I
I Assistant Director I
1i�l�cit
R
9
llJ
U.A
co
EX3
LAJ
ui LAJ
CL
L&J
u
0--
L-
ra
-j
x::
Kn
2m
LAJ
LAJ
M
co
ti
-KC
co
co
2-.
Ln
-C;. >
C"
ui
uCL
are
M
w
Ln
-Kc Ln
c <E
LA
cu
40
a
4+ a
= M
%n
"I
C-3
KU
w ga
0)
V,
--u
tu Ln
IOU
CP
Ln ms �o Li
fu
X= tu IN c
3m
cn
al
LLn rel u
n tm Yi
M
a=
I= CLI
u n U- "U
I.- am
> =
W. >-
'a a L- to
4.
in '" w M
=
a,
as ul . .2 a.—
4A a Ui
CN
im aj
CLO ai
En
lu u
M <C L.
ca uv
C3
L:
Ml
Ln
cu 'n
Jp
u =
tn
Ln
Ln
= cl
c c
C2.
9--
MO
tj u
CLO
C)
u
m
Ln
KU
cu
CLI
as,
m
lu
Ln I-
OC
tn c)
cm X=
CLI
rra
cu
W
i
'
en
cu
4.
In
In
a)
Ln
u
I-
"o aj
aA 4.
t" t-
a) =3
ic
&n "w
4.
m
acu
CLI
>
L- cu as
kn
L. Ln
.0
a 4.
a LZ"$
mc u
aa
cu
aj Ln
CL
0) a0
.= =
4. L.
4. =
=
- — 1:
Lo >� .
'W 0 3W
— r-
> m
a
aCL.
= Ln
a)
S- I. =-
cu
Ln
L.
m
ci
L_
0 kn tn &n
Li
lu ro
ai a)
- >�
u
4.
t- C.
1. . 4.
u IN
.0
:3
In
o
lu
=
cu
4.
"I lu U
a =
4. CU > n
1.-
4.
L-
a� "I,
U
C2
no .— Z 0i
k= C7, cu u
cm
a, m
CL
Ln
Go
'Z
cu
cu lu
0 4..
L- m
a
CL. re
:3 cs
lu
a
cu
. 0
CL a, a
U, lu -3
r
lu M I.-
Ln
L-
uv
CL
t- w
a
cu a
lu
C',
'd
0 In "a
Ln
0
a
L. t- -+-
u cu
0A
o —
t- u
I aj o
ft "0 .-
w I-
oj
1.
"I u -V
IS — —
m
m
m
w
co
q3
:3 "o
in
13U cm
"0 cm
tn
4.
r u -r to m
Li
"0
u
ID :3
to to a)
cli
IM
tailr4
-=
�:-
to
a
= &-
u m
In
C"
IfdE
C2
m u
rt,
LA
to
rcl 32
•.. C, rot,
to
c
ac 10
--- 4-
cm L .0
Co. cn
4.
ul
to C.
lu
L" I= 4. CL
4-
m
u
m a aaj
U
cu
cu =
Lnw V
an re
u "M
— ol
'u
= F=
4. -lot
1
a to
an. am 0
=0
to
o to
U,
to tu
Ul
cu On
0
u 4)
co
cu
0
ra ID
cu 0,
"W 0 1
m
CL a
WE tn m up
Ln
-4-
kn
C,
m
Val
ca
tu
cu
ni
ni
cu
cu
to g--
m o C;,
" .2
aUs
> c:
a
M o a'a
a a
cu m
at
a C a
ut
0
w
a
cn a
o
10 171 v
4. 4.
cu .0
cu
w a
=1
M
to
m 2
a,
V
L- m AA
U
Ul a,
C3,
Ln
0
cu P-4 -m
to
w
L-
L- m
0 ed
CU
n 0 C,
tm CL. &- ai 0
M m
0 x
u
in lu
CL
kn -V
=
aj r-
GA In
m
X=
0)
RI"
.0
in
cu
r
'n
9- 4. 1.-
a)
J=
U 0
ns
CL
2%,
0
aj = cx. 231
m (LI
.2 -+- �; -o In
= L-
COU w
C"
= L-
cu CL
m
m
u
u
0)
M -W _.j
0- w
a m 131
to a
a c m
= =
0"
L-
w
>' w
L- 4- to
-V --
w
M
aC3,
O 9=
a
Ul
aC,
4- al �A
P4
.
.4u
w CD InL C
a Im
a .4+ a
U
a
a,
A
W. to
a
1=
ci
1= u m
W
m
m
LM
cm
ra
Cp
cu
KU
Ul
39
0
ale
C:>
4-
r-
nL
4..
t- 'to
GA
up
Cn
4)
L�
4A
KU
A2
Cin -)
23
C�
Ln
utu
in
.+-
Ku
c
4.
M
L"
0 Ln
L1-3
C,
C-3
am
ow
cn
En
u
a
=1
ru
4-
"0
!:
CL
ai
.0
En
In
gu
I.-
LAJ
a'w
LU
m
1.
C
tn
4. .4.-
CLI
"s
tp
"a
4-
cu
cu
%-
aj
cn C:L.
cu
to
0)
cm
cry
4.
u of
Cn
«cu
'a
= —
10
Cl.-
C
t-
L- Id ale
L-
u
'a
r L "
0.2
xrO
Ln
tn
%n
Ln
ul
Ln
Ln
Ln
L-
ai
6-
aj
&-
GA
I-
CU
&-
lu
cu
I-
lu
L-
do
Ln
-W
4.
ra
=9
rcl
rd
rd
fa
ra
m
ot
v cu
P4 -4
P4
4
-4
LY
4.
Ln
Ln
cu
cu
C"
cu
Ln
in
'Co
cu
C3
01
Z =1
a
4.
x
C,
L-
a
in
Ln
u
Ln
y.n
&-
0
39 > "93
w " w
in
a:3
u
CL
ou
In
v
Ul
-u fm ra u
lu
aro
aM
N
'd o' to
4-
Ln
K7,
t-
CL
cn
aj
La.
tu Ln
cu a
ci
CL
nt
L-
Ln
C=
Ln
4-
CA
>
.5
m
=
Ln
2 W cu
4. CU
a
C--
Ln
ra ra 0)
Ln
A
.0
aj
u 4, w Lj m
r- — > =
4-
IU
t- ai r-
L- Al
cu
cu
CL.
tn
-V
m ra ou "= tu
c. u
M
C,
.4.
a tn Ln
ra
aCO
u
1
U
4-
4-
ai
C a_
Q
Ln
V-
u
0 0 ea.Ls-
r 4-
tn
L-
0 u
in lu QA
t-
u t= a)
cu u cb Ln
Ln
-1
>
L- Ln
ns
C"
aa
4-
> 4-
CL
a
Ln
.2
u
m
f
m
4-
C,
40 0 CL
■
rL in
r "
cu m
I.-
4. -V m CP
to
u C2 a
m 1.- .2
u 0
Z
rd
aj
M
U CL 4-
'n
:2
C
a,
cl
to 4.
Id
cr
CL ci
X=n1 L. M
0 0
CLI
= .
lu 0) 0
u
CD .0
u L'i
in
a
u
03 M
Ul
LJJ U;
cu
cu
ti
tlu
flu
L.
CL
vi
Ln
-0
ci
Ln
Ln
a
c; C2
Ln
u
C. M
I- u
7 1;
L-
>
c ai
to
mLn
&n
ai
u
ra
cu 2
L.
"0
L. Ln
61 01
10 C.
CL c
u
-V
Ln
aj
cu in
a
cm
C
a
=3 a .2
cr cm u
=3
-V
cu
O
L.j m
a
ra
t-
4-
u
a&a
9=1 KLI 4.- C cn
— L- = no
4. a
I*
a
'm
-V > u
Ili cu
tu m
4. cm
to
O
W
u v a I=
N
u
t- L-
Ln Ln
Ln a
U o
aI-
L..
aU
a
a a 0
vs u m r4
u
cm
a
C" u
0 a
Cil
u
IN
u
10
C7, 0 "tz In _u
cn
aZ
4-
to
u
m
m
co
0-
tn
LA
Cy
4-
L
cm
tu
4.
cu
0
u
V
u
a
4.
in
cu
C"
"a
lu
a
u
aM.
mcu
ro
to
CL
a
At
.�;
0
ro
cu
4.
co
tu
u
>
cu
Cu
lL
u
cu
In
lu
4.-
c
y
Tj
r-
lu
tu
4.
1 au
cu
m
cu
tn
m
-C
Li
a,
a
1.- 4
41-A
W
0
"0GA
Ln
L-
m
L-
c W
L-
0
4-
cu CL a m
ai
"0
al CL
u
C-) L3
CL. C-)
ui
bg
Ln
u
do
u
cu au,
au,
u
u
u
u
u
u
am
W90
cu
cu
aj
w
0
rL
WW
LLj LZ
U;
U;
LZ
W
L'i
W
r
cu
4-
tn
C"
cu
4.
,n
cu
C"
.2
Ln
:2
0.
v
1.-
ul
cu
in
to
a6-
co
a
L
c
J=
0
u
C)
cu
u
+.
4-
cu
0)
.0
Li
u
4-
A
•
Li
C.
cu
&-
in
-0
as
C-3
0
L-
"0
-
I-
L-
r_
c
W
0
OA
0.0
kn
re
aj
cr
w
x
w
cr
Q
CL. 0
A
:Z:
C2
u
0)
Ln
131
1.-
4.
u
ttagCIA &-
C=
Cn
tn
in
a,
4.
Ln
L-
Ln
aj
to
C.
4. 4-
>Ln
�
%A
c
lu
u
tn CD
0
L-
CD
no
C"
L-
:3
.0
-
gu
PA
cn
.2
$-
=
-0
m
—
u
c
V
a
u
no
+-
mm
w
u
rL
IOU,
!L)
c-.
x
z
MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
ITEM NUMBER:
Consideration of a Request for Public Water
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY "F"LRc'MAT410N?� U
11.E.3.
As a result of a petition, the Utilities Department has
conducted a survey in the Stafford Place Subdivision to
determine the number of residents that would sign contracts
to connect to public water. There were 54 residents in the
area surveyed and we received 40 signed contracts to connect
to public water which amounts to 72.7% of the residents. The
wells were tested in the area and determined that 62.5% were
contaminated. The estimated cost of this project is
$110,000.00 which leaves a balance of $204IR_5a ;n the
Extension to Existing Subdivisions Fund.
Staff recommends that the Utilities Department be
authorized to proceed with this project. This project will
be funded from the FY 86-87 Capital Improvement Budget,
Water Line Extensions to Existing Subdivisions.
District: Matoaca
Recoimend Approval
IF / 700-W—O4
/
ATTACHMENTS: YES QT NO O
DO
SIGNATURE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
•
OQFc \t ` n,
boo tf
\ 9RADLEY �I
PROGE
o-°
\, LU u �\ a' 90 I 1 1
/ \ b
I ,
••� . (�1637,
0
_\ ,
9D I
•Bg41vrti - 6 22 ' \
Oaw •• Rp z / ` g G/ • W \ O
G owe 0�
Church
. o W o a s*•.
Q . 4 o ( �,
• •• alb � � �,
o
147
110
p Q
O/ I church 669I1
N
1411
0
W
2 �
� I
0
i 00 O,o 'o /
10 669 1 - F
oo;,,
En
n
CONTRACTS WERE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTS IN
STAFFORD PLACE. ALL ARE CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832
UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
Residents Who Signed Contracts (UPDATE - 3-11-87)
1) Mr. & Mrs. Richard Harless
16401 Sandyford Road
2) Mr. & Mrs. Bernard Cambell
6837 Bixby Lane
3) Mr. & Mrs. Michael Reynolds
21117 Warren Avenue
4) Mrs. Helen Walker
6819 Bixby Lane
5) Mr. & Mrs. Romi Lee Chitwood
6811 Bixby Lane
6) Mr. & Ms. Charles Hutson
6816 Bixby Lane
7) Mr. & Ms. Willie Clarke
6820 Bixby Lane
8) Mr. & Mrs. Hollis Slate
6713 Hagerty Lane
9) Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Russell
6830 Bixby Lane
10) Mr. & Mrs. James Green
6834 Bixby Lane
11) Mr. & Mrs. John Bersik
6701 Reomold Drive
12) Mr. & Mrs. George Herb
6700 Hagerty Lane
13) Mr. & Mrs. Robert Masters
6704 Hagerty Lane
14) Mr. & Mrs. Dan Schorre
6716 Hagerty Lane
15) Mr. & Mrs. Walter Covington
6720 Hagerty Lane
LNGLST-P7
Residents Who Signed Contracts (UPDATE 3-11-87)
16) Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Moore
6726 Hagerty Lane
17) Mr. Timothy Jefferson
6844 Bixby Lane
18) Mr. & Mrs. Rob Gordon
6718 Reinhold Drive
19) Mr. & Mrs. Walter Davis
6712 Reinhold Drive
20) Mr. & Mrs. William Ketcham
6700 Reinhold Drive
21) Mr. James Manley
6616 Hagerty Lane
22) Mr. William Berkel
6615 Hagerty Lane
23) Mr. & Mrs. William Johnson
6617 Hagerty Lane
24) Mr. & Mrs. Henry Ross
6621 Hagerty Lane
25) Mr. & Mrs. Arnold Conrad
16201 Sandy Ford Road
26) Mr. & Mrs. Granville Westermann
16207 Sandy Ford Road
27) Mr. & Mrs. Wilmer Siegle
16219 Sandy Ford Road
28) Mr. Jeffery Mayton
16301 Sandy Ford Road
29) Mr. & Mrs. Lennie Smith
16307 Sandy Ford Road
30) Ms. Jo Carol Mayton
16313 Sandy Ford Road
31) Mr. & Mrs. Herman Hacker
16319 Sandy Ford Road
32) Mr. & Mrs. Deroy Colbert
6720 Woodpecker Road
LNGLST-P8
00; ,
Residents Who Signed Contracts (UPDATE 3-11-87)
33) Ms. Cynthia Hill
6833 Bixby Lane
34) Mr. R. Simmons & Ms. L. Hilton
6827 Bixby Lane
(Ownes: 6812 Bixby Lane)
35) Mr. & Mrs. Robert Weldon
6709 Hagerty Lane
36) Ms. Nancy Brockwell
6719 Reinhold Drive
37) Mr. & Mrs. Gary Bennett
6838 Bixby Lane
38) Ms. Jeanne Cole
6620 Hagerty lane
39) Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Porter
6611 Hagerty Lane
40) Mr. James Crawley
6820 Woodpecker Road
(Ownes: 6830 Woodpecker Road)
LNGLST-P9
00 p,I
CONTRACTS WERE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTS IN
STAFFORD PLACE. ALL ARE CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832
UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED.
Residents Who Did Not Sign (UPDATE - 3-11-87)
1) Mr. & Mrs. Donald Warriner
6843 Bixby Lane
2) Mr. & Mrs. Bruce Simmons
6725 Hagerty Lane
3) Mr. & Mrs. Freddie Wallen
6721 Hagerty Lane
4) Mr. & Mrs. Roager Goad
6713 Hagerty Lane
5) Mr. Carl Parsons
6826 Bixby Lane
6) Mr. & Mrs. Michael Wood
6715 Reinhold Drive
7) Mr. & Mrs. Linwood Moore
6711 Reinhold Drive
8) Mr. & Mrs. Claiborne Stevens
6708 Hagerty Lane
9) Mr. & Mrs. James Jones
6712 Hagerty Lane
10) Mr. & Mrs. Jerrell Pritchett
6704 Reinhold Drive
11) Mr. & Mrs. Edward Bon Jonia
6600 Hagerty Lane
12) Mr. Jack Hutchins
162134 Sandy Ford Road
13) Mr. & Mrs. Carl Bryant
6800 Woodpecker Road
14) Mr. & Mrs. Fred Yeatts
6810 Woodpecker Road
LNGLST-P5
MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
ITEM NUMBER: ll.E.4.a.
Approval of Agreement with the Virginia Department of
Transportation for the Adjustment of Utilities
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This agreement provides for the relocation of utility
lines during the construction of Turner Road. Cost of this
work is 80.13% project cost for water and 75.9% project cost
for sewer. The remaining cost is County cost.
Staff has reviewed this agreement and recommends that the
County Administrator be authorized to execute this agreement on
behalf of the County subject to approval of the County Attorney.
Funding for this project is recommended by transferring
$245,000 from 5B Fund Balance to W86-178CD for water. Sewer
has been funded by past Board action.
District: Clover Hill
Recommend Approval
1
PREPARED BY: '
ATTACHMENTS: YES a NO O
SIGNATURE: 449711-00p,,
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AGENDA ITEM
Virginia Department of Transportation
The Virginia Department of Transportation will be
reconstructing Turner Road between Route 60 and Route 360.
Construction of this roadway will cause major adjustments to
our water lines which would be under the new highway. There
are at present, water lines and service connections the
entire length of roadway. However, the Virginia Department
of Transportation will pay most of the cost of water
relocations. (80-13%) Sewer relocation cost were approved by
the Board last year with $100,000 appropriated from the
1986-87 extension funds.
Therefore, we are requesting formal approval of the
standard agreement and appropriate $245,000 from water fund
balance to the project W86-178CD to cover the County cost of
water relocation. No action required for sewer other than
approval of the agreement.
/0e)p,�
00 �'8
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987 11.E.4.b.
MEETING DATE: ITEM NUMBER:
SUBJECT: Approval of an Easement to VEPCO
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests the Board to authorize the Chairman of
the Board and the County Administrator to execute an
easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company for a 20
foot easement across property at the Buford Road water
pumping station.
Virginia Power is relocating several poles in
connection with the road improvement project along Buford
Road. In order to shift a pole across Buford Road from the
water pumping station an easement for overhead lines across
a portion of the pumping station lot is needed.
Staff has reviewed this request and recommends that the
Board authorize the Chairman of the Board and the County
Administrator to sign the easement agreement.
District: Midlothian
Recommend Approval
ATTACHMENTS: YES & NO 0
SIGNATURE: 114?A 0t) &,
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 9
l
0�2
4 Q
�v pJ
Q Co
caNE Rr 877
O
Sul.
021 ,Q= OQkS
2
/ m
0
0,
�1
V HST '=vJ C6 8 012C-_46, IM-5C1
Plat To Accompany
Right -Of --Way Aareement
L ;anc VARGINLA POWER Virginia E:ac:nc and Power Company
_ Location Cf Boundary U Cf Right -Of -Way
—�� Cistnct MIDLOTHIAN
Oistnet-Township-Bcrcugn County -City State
MIDLOTHIAN CHESTERFIELD VA
Office CENTRAL Plat Number00860082
Estimate Number Grid Number
05 071549 00 G220(f)�
Oats�-
No.97538010
w
--_ -- � JOINS
b
R I C H M 0 N D
I ROBERT EARL CIR.
J�/NN
1a7 �JG� eP�
i
aVv i
~oo'
%E SERD
Aoo
t i
; ¢ a
GS p
7 9uLLIN yp0
2
r
o
0
a0
1^ PKE
UI LES
asoN
O
w
UI ¢ �W00 y4a
I
U
PATT S
o 7,
w
wp r ON
W
2 2
c
W ROR
BE
o
�� �900 9060ND IR
y
p
Okp4M
V
° a
W START
33JR
a ?
ul
I REDS cwi?n'l�
r'
rh �
C \\ Alw
,�
7 40� M O
O
p� j
8 7 C
W ROoLL O
O
U a 9 \
U W?4 f
V.N
O CLEW
RpN
6
N
SEvILLE SOUTHERN _ N�
y,Q OU4�
LA RO
ROCK4 W A 1
1P O 4O
P
O�
1
*, _C� ,t.1 Qh O C
mod• �y0
71
J)
�'1 I CT
2 Ro L
ay
o
m
i
w.e
Q
RECEPTION B�OIA2 9L
GN
`CENTER
O z 0 '2 O
a
r
•• �
N
E
e� GT
,
NG,PRO
AIR
BON
SCHOOL
4� <?
FOR GIRLS
718
F O
0
q c CR T' •'�
r
! CGS ROBIOUS HALL
�p�
SHOPPING
CT
PVN
, o
e 6 o° CENTER
°' Ra
i
O'N
C+ HA OR S
I
° MI o
=
row
RD '
c C. Midb/A'o
E �_
c ; WNW PO OP�E
Pa o r Calla Q AS NTON
O CK ,y% If� CT m
`Pd`o
m ILA' OP �g5
RO
S � RENpv P� O(�l/r / n
o a 0?yam
P
Qp A vEN4 N O MCO/IS1 fold p
L4 CO Iu
f,P
r4,y / • aE01 NGTON Q`N
OR
? /ndualrN!/
AvELL
0ONACNT
OR
pork
8
i
2O
J�
o TJ CN/ppE
owe NH4 M
�q I
e<ti kk4Y
/E�a�E PO 9 � PO
cl SPPOU \\ NPM
PO
B �
° R I C H M 0 N D
AN
A OP Q• MC s \ P JNO�E
MCP RO O C� OP OCQ�►' �\ eUP
i r R 0 y\
11P or�r 3�00 J P CNEL
w HILL °
084�' ° 8 A
BE\\
n = yOEMEER
678
° 9 OP R
� N °
N �N � NEv S OR O� °aJ�E SO�jNER �
.E aD BEN aOeKa BRENTFORD DR
AZ EN St FLOOCIa „ate oti = °o m o v m
cwesrw—A 0 {
1p AvIGNON Dq m /c v\ T SS�i ELEM LI j O
�3•
I t Zm c^
CKA V a0 m( \NOTON DR C2m O NGt ON
WNIT to
Lane FOO'
T L* a0 Q 3 Oa U \ C+
A +
S �a it N IE`N a ? ° aMOUtN Y�
IN
aK gON 9 � � \� pO A Oa
A W '
ES ET OR f0 BEAUDET 9; (q
L r
' St SS ➢ LA AO W,t ND 4 m ai ,..,..
BEM 2 O
aE�ILaO ao 686
D c R
N '
jAHNKE .soo °
S aENS Ego° RD \EPICR a
PD h, 1 g EPIC �y = '.
h�
SUN IVY ROO Q•y La �
°a Q PO Ur
O
!• 1 �4 4T p 37. ,yy ? 411S t�
L4 v�
E o eS �� a V' OP
PAN o �i0` 10
y R 1 RF
eAO
4' C 90
pO PUS C CI.
P s` o
i Lc dP be 4, ?K 0
13
j N = Q
m
a�w PKE
5t °q I
FORD
0pY F IEOL�\ LICE
DR
`+ MMID SO STATE
9 PO
O� R qc
Q 02 1 °�
iw4/'f%+ ` CT Z BCTpRD v
/ w
O A b -
°E 1. tiORD SwpPPING
kc�
�t°� , o ro c
JOINS It-P
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
.E.4.c.
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 11
ITEM NUMBER: —.—.,
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Deed of Dedication along Bundle Road
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff requests the Board accept the conveyance of a 30'
strip of land along Bundle Road from Continental Land Sales,
Inc., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the
necessary deed.
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way
whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road
width as shown on the Plan 2000. The dedication of this right of
way conforms to that plan.
Staff recommends that the Board accept the conveyance of
this right of way and authorize the County Administrator to
execute the necessary deed.
District: Matoaca
Recommend Approval
PREPARED BY_'z
:'�
ATTACHMENTS: YES TF NO D
SIGNATURE:
UNT ADMINISTRATOR
R'�EN Jo N
_ _ 38
Qa r ' a PJ� 'z �./ / i / � I � •
RIryC eN a� a,OCE P 0 C A
65 T �,w0 ` yam+ Qy G. I '
�, oo ?'O N .... i �•
i BEQL G2� .1"J 1/' P O C A r� O N A 5 I
P A R K
9
Vi
i O 0R, Br °nLA p r�
lZ
9 4
. a
_ _ P
• F' p Y -INI
�PJ P o ;
1 I \
door i
r_'---
53 Z I
h \
55a �
I
a
SID
\ o�
\ BEACH
I J
a 1 •\ /
:AC . H I 0.30 o i
JIMMI RD 655 I,
D O00 ly0 ' J0
= Gt110
f
Q- O°j.breo•
Or
m
,
J
y
v � �
o
0.10
i
I M1 61f0..1
S�LOnd 9 1 =ch
r�nCA
� I
I �
1 �
j I• • �\1 v r /
7
-- JOINS 50
Page 38
S 67' 59, 59' E
30.02'
G = 25' 3/' 27'
R = /093.62'
L = 48718'
d - 25' 34' 52'
R = 1063.62'
L - 474.88'
-COW NSIMAL L ,V STALE M
D.B. /786 PG. /702
TAX MAP /28-PARCEL /O
.
Z N
V%
� N �
to .�
7� m
k3%ofy
E
SCRIP 0 1 p (,o
�
3p0'NE rERFIEI.
70�
MADGE WIL SON
ESTA TE
W.B. /26 PG. /04
0,.. in
No. 1553
s. UPJ 35./9' C3 1
SURVEY OF
30' STRIP TO BE DEDICATED TO CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY FOR ROAD WIDENING
MA TOACA D/ST, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VA
SCALED /' = ROO' DATE► 2/ /3/ 87
BY
CARROUTH AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYORS
9100 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY.
RICHMOND, VA.
MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
ITEM NUMBER: 11.E.4.d.
Acceptance of Deed of Dedication along Warbro Road
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION *-
Staff requests the Board accept the conveyance of a 5'
strip of land along Warbro Road from H. W. Blankenship and
Sons, Inc., and authorize the County Administrator to
execute the necessary deed.
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way
whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road
width as shown on the Plan 2000. The dedication of this right of
way conforms to that plan.
Staff recommends that the Board accept the conveyance of
this right of way and authorize the County Administrator to
execute the necessary deed.
District: Clover Hill
Recommend Approval
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: YES NO 0
SIGNATURE: OS
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
..ENr-•,A RO \ JOINS T 16
AEI u I '* \ � y �D �e� o pp v o o • O yV � ay.D<!A q t p __ C - ___
� lai I \ qRy t � ° f� Oa ♦ �
YYex,00 q4,y Oq • CdG • z '�O ~a �7,'j�
15h;Ff o`i \ ♦� `�` ......-. - � \,�C�/•r AryO 'ao o d3 �OpO � V 9 4'
COUNT
E''1 EpENOEaD o��SED••R / / • • t' ,/-[
0P
�.
i
• LANOG[0 AOM�R i 9G . r .900 I rEF / PV Cr.
s ..
BERRAND RDlppp Z C' ER
<'q S� II Cr NOU
. P PNT O P 3 O D
.`� iGLEN E DII 624 a o D
o uv
D O DU _ .i J sr.�Na "" - a M o v S",OUD
Rry"F, N C , 2I \ \ EF O tp�E I �� 2 /�`l "1• •-{ p�pOF�,+..
!L DGE RD/ c
....11 ¢_ I LOOP \ P A ,� w
kwo
3 I g �v MONAGAw �a rEwBP�•r C� o
GORDON ti : L r v C, • r'
3f� I • Q C l P b �..
GORDON / ` me W •��°1 �N°_,,
IIIELENaEND:F'ON Ay = . • = _ _ '0•
x cpMgw RE, • CHERYL NNE O RD •I
r .'. ..
a , $ g 653r
720 ¢ r •z T• ,(AYVEE
1 / �• Q SUNFLOWER . �'0
�DIS
TJ ct I DIST \ ..,���;r �`� •.o ° > Il\ E
, .:"" ✓ -- ,��\-p .`\i'1� • °• :o \ �cJ" of
URy ,\ / • •6�, •°gym ate•• \�po a•:
�� ,RL. < <� PLE%� / - '� F co*r •gal our
��r� ) q �a� J 'I• \ I E nW..J ` �� • 0 wISCO AD �. gTT
CO.
410
P
\ KP ti
pWY� _ —___ D
jl
IT
CLEM. SCN. pDWH\ \ TOMAHANK
I RUCTION City .•` \ ACADEMY • V.
y"TRU \E `\ \ 4 'L
'I UNDER CO . � 040EM� i I
a�,N•ar� �`'a ° DR
•
\ q;OG� ty sb •� +�
I \ CLE MaLCHN ! Q G
• W
C \`\ \
III \ P \ \ m\ b • 9 LA
Imo, • �
I I ♦ lr•CV[P opINT w O O M DA O ?O .\ - /
\ SOUT.ISIDE BE rr a� a 4 Z ,OG o \ �g(v /
/
t SPEEDWAY I I MCMAwMaT o`T
/I I I 1rr'
..... GE IFq k v
NT0 �OIr / ,� RD OTVINGEp Oq ��
1 •PUMP / '9 is F[ 0 ~�0 P C
STA W t o ET p o m
1 ,�
^-P�___-__- --- _-________
-0 WI a �• J ° V � qqW / /f' Y•�' N4Y f
yr JI lot
v
o al
Z YI .ogFA •� OV•rpINE Jq
2 F In
a rf Z
'L4N00r/LL 604It
J , ELgN q IYMPGpT A
IF
/ b ,{v •< <' t JOIN DoorNr
'a 1 `� •O i7 41 'Ih o o IS* iy CT 36,, .
48
e GN
JOINS 2-110111
6
• Is
o.
3
N 89.39'40" E'
5.00 _
Jfp
H. W. BLANKENSHIP >L SONS
D.B. 1762 PG. 1972
TAX PARCEL NO. 449-3(1) 12
S rI025' W
146.02
550t TO C/L N MO'25" E I T
OENITO ROAD 145.99 10 � ' 30
�� WARBRO ROAD
0.060
R'�`°� L.Z�►° / ACRES
R,3T3.SO i
PLAT SHOWING 0.060 ACRES OF LAND LYING
ON THE EAST LINE OF W.ARBRO -ROAD Tb BE
DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
F,AL7'N
J.K TIMMONS & ASSOCIATES. INC.
ENOINEERW*SURVEYORS •►LANNERS
NOTE E=TMG PROPERTY LINES TAKEN 711 N. COURTHOUSE AD. RICHMOND. VA.
p KENNETH M. COX �,,, FROM PLAT BY POTTs AND MriTE7t- 8803 STAPLES MILL RD. HENRICo CO.. VA.
c7 YL LAND sU1vEYORt 2430 PAGEHURST DRIVE MIDLOTHIAN. VA
CERT # 10� �� APR 4 Ism 411 E. BROADWAY HOPEWELL. VA.
�► �f%���J 4 —
//"�I�� D DATE: 1-28-87 WALE: r-Ka
!� �>Kn s� DRANK 11Y: EAH /j
ACED Wr:
rREvK" cos m +Os Na ei l % Z` <"
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
MEETING DATE: ITEM NUMBER: 11.E. 4. e.
SUBJECT: Encroachment on a County Easement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff request the Board to approve the encroachment of
a proposed security brick wall and brick walkway
(surrounding an in ground pool) on an existing County
Easement across Lot 1, Block Q, Winterfield Section,
Salisbury.
Mr. Nicholas J. Mailo at 13849 W. Salisbury Road has
requested permission to encroach' within an existing County
Easement with a security brick wall and brick walkway on the
south side of his home. The staff has reviewed this and
feels that the encroachment will not adversely effect any
future utilities.
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the
encroachment of the security brick wall and brick walkway.
District: Midlothian
Recommend Approval
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: YES'' NO O
t%�88
SIGNATURE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
lb m
q p MICHAE�'�
•n\V RIDGE
51
FA-
JOINS
6
/ Q0
\ s
r'
1
I 1
r RIOT
NON v it
Mil 711
tiTF�
W:
90
ICE COOS \
�,
/
9/
OGE
a
Z
v
4
o�T a
s e �
p�•
d
/
�V,.f Ct.
Zy0 yt,
s`;��
9 K
FOB
C EN i1i
C
N A�O
I
Oyc^C, f [[Fshf
O
£i
m1�ETHERFI ,\p. gm N
o[iNTEL
4RS f
Tf RE
r^
_
r' rl
y = O
LA
PL.
\1 2
op �S
O µp00E Oo A
RD
� 3
`6
4RRANDELL 0
\
�ytpO
`�
JEM
Q
•
� �
�ptw o
RD snusauRY
\\
o
HEIMSLEY P
COUNTRY CLUB 2 22
F
It
PD
SRAEMAR
.� a O I
�' _
MI
RD
,
p
e40 o a a c
tAA OR
v iNE ij
A
WW3
G Q m U
p.
Po
. THORRATE
Om
U1 •'C.
9�
D
1
• Z
� I CT
OEnO �
1 0
MIDL�� I
�'
IN
Ze
=o
14N
�
�
-
% I
RNP�
�aN
WESTFIEID First
Church o
14501
'�
kE
s 0
(�
0.28 .o ^"".. ��
'
•
o��J
sE
Op'(� Ion
,-
14100
�•NRNTER y
. [O sTCIE
�P Ac
•
3 0
Z
p
�- x Q
r
Cc
MIOLO • �� u 0 Q
•
m WICCNEN/g -
DR
I .. ti 7 �
=SV
=
� L'2 L4GF _� p �,� •r;
OJ
��
= O Q �'
• U •�• p I�00 i;
W cc
o o 4 O 4L ENG47 ;
W x 00
1104
8
-
�.i AGEF 10LL••.11At�
3STATiGN JI
L4 N. C U
ARR
a•�
OM/OL07N/IN • �• f �"
c:
o a c
0
m
EEE 140E \_
RD
.N/DOLE SC//OOL
1-¢ i W
r
m O = O I iF OT
LINOHAM
CT
w p
s i
J
L 4
/OLOfM .
p
n� C s; *i-
i cr s
o
GARNETT
L Q S. C
�[ 4
W LA
'o
LA ,�
t
—
JOINS is
P le 6
This is to certify thpit on I made an accurate field survey of the premises shown hereon; that all improvements
known or visible are shown ereon, thy' 'here are no encroachments by Improvements either f - 1 adjoining premises, or from subject
•• premises upon adjoining premises, of an as fhown hereon. According to the current res a National Flood Insurance Program
rate map, this property is located wittilkne L .
r Power is (✓ ) underground, ( ) overhead; telephone is (✓ underground, ( ) overhead. / L�
New ( ) % Complete ; Old (✓) By c�
/G ' Ea,SPmer��
_
S� 0' 51 ' ZO
_ —o
L Power i a-
r
y, a Beock Wdk N
h
0• � ,Bsrc.�
,yes e ,�i 38¢9
l
1
1
1
°moo L Z 0f
--- iv 75' 08' /0" E ,mod IC= Z8Z9. W
pco�- 00t4V4e,
Secc)o- Br x t)AGC
60--iCg W144g-w'A.1/
Ntr AMP
r
p.L.Tli OF s,� Szli-vPyi 4W o�' Lof 1,910C� Q, A1i71elVle/d ROB K THOMAS � S�Cf/o/'2, �/a17671Z5e/Lbv�`r
0
U CERTIFICATE NO. 9 / o/
0 1471 o DATE:
��� -A ROBERT K. THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES SCALE: / " = 50'
�F� LA NO gvP CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA FILE: C'h6-V1- /S
NO: 19-1-r0 C- BY:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
MEETING DATE:
ITEM NUMBER: ll. E. 5 .
SUBJECT: Report of Water and Sewer Contracts by Developers
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following water and sewer contracts were executed
by the County Administrator:
1. W87-27D Woodlake @ Brandermill-Woodlake Clover Hill
Village Parkway -Phase VI
Developer: Investors Woodlake Development Corp.
Contractor: RMC Contractors, Inc.
Number of Connections: 0 $104,709.50
2. W87-22D Fortune Plastics Dale
Developer: Fortune Plastics, Inc.
Contractor: Interstate Construction Corp.
Number of Connections: 1 $33,870.00
3. W87-33D Deer Run - Section II Matoaca
Developer: William B. Duval
Contractor: Rhyne Contractors, Inc.
Number of Connections: 153 $106,485.00
(Continued on next page)
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: YES O NO %3
SIGNATURE: �n
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR '9I
Agenda Item
March 25, 1987
Page 2
4. W86-211D Cross Creek - Section B Midlothian
Developer: Cross Creek Development Corp.
Contractor: Lyttle Utilities, Inc.
Number of Connections: 11 $15,825.50
5. S87-21D Kingsland Baptist Church Bermuda
Developer: Trustees Kingsland Baptist Church
Contractor: IPK Excavating Co. Inc.
Number of Connections: 1 $21,657.00
6. S87-22D Old Creek West Section 9, Phase I Clover Hill
Developer: George B. Sowers, Jr. & Assoc. Inc.
Contractor: Coastline Contractors, Inc.
Number of Connections: 44 $59,744.50
7. S87-23D 360 Commercial Park West Clover Hill
Developer: George B. Sowers, Jr. & Assoc. Inc.
Contractor: Coastline Contractors, Inc.
Number of Connections: 2 $17,947.00
8. S87-28D B&B Amusements -Parcel 10 Bermuda
Developer: James W. Blackburn and Diane P. Blackburn
Contractor: Nelson -White Construction Management Corp.
Sub -Contractor: Best Backhoe Excavating Co.
Number of Connections: 1 $3,860.00
fj'q'
.9�
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
REPORTS
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 11.F.1.
REPORT ON: SCHEDULE OF SCHOOL LITERARY LOANS, DISTRICT ROAD AND
STREET LIGHT FUNDS, GENERAL FUND BALANCE, ROAD RESERVE
FUNDS, GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT AND CAPITALIZED
LEASE PURCHASES
ATTACHMENTS: YES P NO C3 00,93
GIGNATUM: COUNT�ADM�11414V�JATOR�
}
Prepared by Budget & Management
March 18, 1987
SCHW= OF SCHOOL LITERAW LOANS
Approved By Board
Of Supervisors
C O N V E R
S I O N
Balance
FY LOAN TO
Proiect
Date
Amount
Date
Amount
03 18 87
Be Paid Out
Greenfield & Watkins
1979
$ 1,500,000
12/15/79 $
1,340,075 $
871,650
2000
Grange Hall
3/26/80
1,000,000
6/l/82
1,000,000
800,000
2002
Harrowgate
3/26/80
750,000
8/l/81
553,441
415,500
2002
Swift Creek Jr.
3/26/80
750,000
8/l/81
537,184
403,500
2002
Providence Jr.
3/26/80
750,000
5/l/82
627,942
502,400
2002
Robious Jr.
3/26/80
750,000
3/l/83
566,008
452,800
2003
Salem Jr.
3/26/80
750,000
3/l/83
547,760
438,400
2003
Manchester
3/26/80
750,000
2/l/82
750,000
562,500
2002
Monacan High
3/26/80
750,000
5/l/82
520,539
416,000
2002
Total
6,250,000
5,102,874
3,991,100
Matoaca Elementary
7/l/81
1,000,000
4/l/83
1,000,000
800,000
2003
Clover Hill High
7/22/81
1,000,000
3/l/84
966,854
821,950
2004
Manchester High
7/22/81
1,000,000
6/l/84
1,000,000
900,000
2004
Total
2,000,000
1,966,854
1,721,950
Bellwood
1/13/82
600,000
3/l/85
600,000
540,000
2005
Beulah
1/13/82
750,000
12/15/85
750,000
712,500
2006
Bon Air
1/13/82
1,000,000
3/l/85
1,000,000
900,000
2005
Chalkley
1/13/82
600,000
3/l/85
600,000
540,000
2005
Crestwood
1/13/82
600,000
3/l/85
600,000
540,000
2005
Curtis
1/13/82
600,000
3/l/85
600,000
540,000
2005
Davis
1/13/82
600,000
3/l/85
600,000
540,000
2005
F. C. Elem.
1/13/82
600,000
3/l/85
600,000
540,000
2005
L. C. Bird
1/13/82
1,000,000
ll/l/84
980,315
882,000
2004
Matoaca High
1/13/82
1,000,000
ll/l/84
1,000,000
900,000
2004
Meadowbrook
1/13/82
500,000
l/l/84
500,000
425,000
2004
Thomas Dale
1/13/82
1,000,000
6/l/85
1,000,000
950,000
2005
Total
8,850,000
8,830,315
8,009,500
0. B. Gates
2/24/82
2,000,000
9/l/84
2,000,000
1,800,000
2004
Genito Road Elem.
2/24/82
2,000,000
9/l/85
2,000,000
1,900,000
2006
New Midlothian High
2/24/82
2,000,000
2/l/85
2,000,000
1,800,000
2005
Total
6,000,000
6,000,000
5,500,000
Ettrick
7/27/83
2,000,000
8/l/87*
2,000,000
2,000,000
2006*
Gordon
7/27/83
750,000
2/l/87*
750,000
750,000
2006*
Harrowgate
7/27/83
750,000
2/l/87*
750,000
750,000
2006*
Carver Jr.
7/27/83
750,000
8/l/87*
750,000
750,000
2006*
Chester Middle
7/27/83
500,000
2/l/87*
500,000
500,000
2006*
F. C. Jr.
7/27/83
500,000
2/l/87*
500,000
500,000
2006*
Total
5,250,000
5,250,000
5,250,000
,99 op
Approved
By Board
Of Supervisors
C O N V E
R S I O N
Balance
FY LOAN TO
Proiect
Date
Amount
Date
Amount
03 18 87
Be Paid Out
Hopkins
3/28/84
$ 1,500,000
6/l/87*
$ 1,500,000 $
1,500,000
2007*
West Prov. Elem.
3/28/84
2,000,000
6/l/87*
2,000,000
2,000,000
2007*
Monacan High
3/28/84
1,500,000
6/l/87*
1,500,000
1,500,000
2007*
Total
5,000,000
5,000,000
5,000,000
Enon Elem.
12/12/84
1,500,000
6/1/87*
1,500,000
1,500,000
2007*
Hening
12/12/84
750,000
6/l/87*
750,000
750,000
2007*
Watkins
12/12/84
1,000,000
6/l/87*
1,000,000
1,000,000
2007*
Total
3,250,000
3,250,000
3,250,000
360 West Elem.
2/13/85
2,000,000
6/1/87*
2,000,000
2,000,000
2008*
Enon Elem. Addl.
4/25/85
500,000
6/l/87*
500,000
500,000
2007*
L. C. Bird
6/26/85
1,500,000
6/l/87*
1,500,000
1,500,000
2008*
Chester Middle
6/26/85
1,500,000
12/1/87*
1,500,000
1,500,000
2008*
Tech Center
6/26/85
500,000
12/1/87*
500,000
500,000
2008*
Clover Hill High
6/26/85
2,000,000
12/1/87*
2,000,000
2,000,000
2008*
Crestwood Elem.
6/26/85
300,000
12/1/87*
300,000
300,000
2008*
Davis Elem.
6/26/85
300,000
12/l/87*
300,000
300,000
2008*
0. B. Gates
6/26/85
1,500,000
12/1/87*
1,500,000
1,500,000
2008*
Meadowbrook
6/26/85
1,000,000
12/1/87*
1,000,000
1,000,000
2008*
Midlothian High
6/26/85
1,750,000
6/1/87*
1,750,000
1,750,000
2008*
New Elem. (Central)
6/26/85
2,000,000
12/1/87*
2,000,000
2,000,000
2008*
New Elem. (Genito)
6/26/85
2,000,000
12/1/87*
2,000,000
2,000,000
2008*
New Elem. (360/Courthouse)
6/26/85
2,000,000
12/1/87*
2,000,000
2,000,000
2008*
Providence Jr.
6/26/85
750,000
12/1/87*
750,000
750,000
2008*
2008*
Wells Elem.
6/26/85
1,750,000
12/l/87*
1,750,000
1,750,000
Total
18,850,000
18,850,000
18,850,000
Meadowbrook
6/25/86
1,000,000
12/1/88*
1,000,000
1,000,000
2009*
TOTAL LITERARY LOANS
$61,450,000
$60,090,118
$56,744,200
* Estimates
Ooa
m
c+1
Co
d'
r-i
I—
Ln
Ul
U
r
r
m
Ln
w
Ln
is
O1
N
V'
M
l0
If'
41
rd
ri
lqv
cn
r I
Ln
N
•RV
S�
LdS
U!
44
Pq
'd
O
r♦
I—
O
I-
m
M
Ln
44
N
�4
'd
'd
o
r-
w
to
M
m
'd
En
U]
r-I
N
01
l+1
r I
O
cd
W
34
�4
4J
41
O
O
O
ri
O
O
O
N
U�
N
—4
O
o
Ln
o
O
o
U
'd
A
4J
O
O
cn
O
O
O
N
S4
I-
R1
c*1
N
00
r1
l0
l0
r-i
l0
l0
to
H
W
+1
� '
w
a
r I
O
Ham'
Q
4
�
41
(d
r.
H t`
a
Q
O
m
�d
'
[� r-i
44
�4
U
W
O
rd
cz OD
U
r-i
r-I
Ln
N
l0
Q
t.0
m
P ri
U]
U
00
"T
o
r-i
O
\
00
41
ul
N
O
O
NVri
z
4
�
Nr
.4:
r
r
M
a
rd
r-I
Vim'
r-I
N
a
°
00Cr%
v
W
Q
�
O
ooLno
Ln
Ln
o
x
ra
Ln
�
cn
o
Oo
z
4
�
N
b
En
Ln
Ln
ri
0
w
4
U
FI
O
A
4-)
O
O
O
O
O
'd
4'
o�����
�
a
�°b
o
w
o
z
N
14
4
+J
44
�
�
U
a
b
Q
0
rd
I
U
O
'd
IU
i4
3 4
r-I
r-I
l0
N
l0
w
Ld
N
)
[�
IV
IV
Q
0
41
0
O
.1
N
�4
1
Ol
Ln
I—
l0
z
0)
U
.ri
}4
-P
p.1
U
N
r--1
00
N
Ld
rn
�4
A
r-q
4-J
U2
8
N
O
•rl
((3
rl
N
H
44
A
• A
'd
�4
U
4-)>1
r-II
00
�
�
h
�
ICI!
) 4
O
rU-I
'd
�
U
Q
Q
�
Q
z
x
O
0096
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
March 18, 1987
Board
Meeting
Date
Description
Amount
Balance
07/01/86
FY87 Budgeted Beginning
Fund Balance
$10,322,758
07/01/86
Add to Fund Balance in FY87 Budget
+790,300
11,113,058
07/01/86
Reserve for Future Debt
3,765,500
7,347,558
07/09/86
Debt Service - Reduction of FY87
interest expense due to refunding
a portion of the 1981 bonds
+ 78,400
7,425,958
07/09/86
MH/MR - Fund critical needs
85,900
7,340,058
07/23/86
Board Miscellaneous - Paint Water
Tank
25,000
7,315,058
08/13/86
Old Stage Road - Waterline extension
37,500
7,277,558
09/24/86
Leaf Collection
116,500
7,161,058
10/22/86
Chester Landfill Groundwater
Program
60,000
7,101,058
O1/14/87
Jail Addition Architectural Services
31,850
7,069,208
02/11/87
County Museum - County History Book
Project ($8,000 for author fees and
$25,333 for publication)
20,694
7,048,514
03/11/87
Drug Abuse Survey - (Human Services)
Drug Abuse Task Force
12,000
7,036,514
03/11/87
Treasurer - Remit unclaimed property
to Treasurer of Virginia
9,949
7,026,565
03/11/87
Additional State revenues for Treasurer
($17,500) and Commissioner of Revenue
($21,545)
+39,045
7,065,610
009�,
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
ROAD RESERVE FUNDS
March 18, 1987
Board
Meeting
Rt. 36 Rt. 10
Date
Description
Ettrick Chester
05/09/84
Route 36 Ettrick - Appropriated for
design contract with VDH&T $
150,000
10/10/84
Route 10 - Design work for widening
through Chester
$ 350,000
10/10/84
Route 36 Ettrick - Additional funds for
design contract with VDH&T
165,000
08/28/85
Route 36 Ettrick - Transferred General
Funds to Ruffin Mill Road project
(133,000)
08/28/85
Route 36 Ettrick - Use of Revenue
Sharing funds
133,000
03/12/86
Route 36 Ettrick - Reduce Revenue
Sharing and add back General Funds
0
03/12/86
Route 10 - Reduce General Funds and
add Revenue Sharing Funds $133,000
0
05/28/86** Route 36 Ettrick - Appropriate Reserve
funds 2,500,000
05/28/86** Route 10 - Appropriate Reserve funds 1,485,000
Total Project Appropriation 2,815,000 1,835,000
* $4,500,000 was reserved 7/1/84 for these projects.
**Chester project loaned the Ettrick project $165,000 5/28/86. On
8/27/86 this loan was repaid through Revenue Sharing Road Match Funds.
0()99
M
M
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
STATUS OF GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT
March 18, 1987
Date
Department/Description
Amount Balance
07/01/86
Original FY87 Budget
Appropriation
$100,000.00
07/09/86
Chamber of Commerce proposal
for Richmond SBA 503
Certified Development Co.
16,860.00 83,140.00
08/13/86
YMCA in Chester/Route 10 -
Donation
23,501.00 59,639.00
09/10/86
Fire Department - Increase
per call paid to volunteers
from $1 to $3
29,000.00 30,639.00
09/26/86
Airport - Renovate terminal
building
7,500.00
23,139.00
10/08/86
Donations - Petersburg
Symphony - additional
5,000.00
18,139.00
11/26/86
Fire Dept. - Paving of
5,500.00
12,639.00
parking lot at Enon
Volunteer Fire Station.
02/14/87
Museum - County History Book
Project ($8,000 for author
fees and $25,333 for publi-
cation)
12,639.00
-
03/13/87
Chamber of Commerce proposal
for Richmond SBA 503 Certi-
fied Development Co. reduc-
5,840.00
5,840.00
tion
Oon.
Prepared by counting Department
March 18, 1
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES
Description
Major Capital Facilities
Lease Purchase:
Data Processing,
Human Services,
Courts Building
Vehicle and Communi-
cations Mainten-
ance Building
Subtotal
Major Equipment Lease
Purchase:
Communications
Equipment:
Microwave System
800 MHz System
Mobile Radios -
Police
Automatic Call
Distributors
Subtotal
Leaf pickup
equipment
Data Processing
equipment
Accounting System
Original
Date
Date
Lease
Lease
Lease Outstanding
Purchase
Purchase
Purchase Balance
Amount
Began
Ends 12/31/86
$ 2,106,355 12/85
5,168,170 12/85
14,440,475 12/85
21,715,000
1,000,000 9/82
22,715,000
1,338,333 5/81
2,888,682 10/84
762,170 12/86
189,897 12/86
5,179,082
214,819 12/86
300,705 8/85
250,000 10/84
6/01 $ 1,990,925
6/01 4,884,950
6/01 * 13,649,125
20,525,000
6/90 551,205
21,076,205
4/88 308,204
7/91 2,052,634
6/91 762,170
6/91 189,897
3,312,905
6/91 211,595
8/89 199,298
9/91 178,490
Original
Date
Date
Lease
Lease
Lease
Outstanding
Purchase Purchase
Purchase
Balance
Description
Amount
Began
Ends
12/31/86
Fire Trucks
404,912
1/83
12/87
91,745
Voting Machines
132,800
7/85
6/90
991,445
Subtotal
1,303,236
780,573
Routine Equipment
Lease Purchase:
Microfilm Equipment
75,640
4/85
3/90
52,312
Vehicles:
County
29,853
12/84
11/87
10,056
Schools
39,804
12/84
11/87
13,512
Printshop Equipment
52,613
4/84
9/88
14,709
Copiers
23,530
12/83
12/90
12,769
Nursing Home Copier
6,836
9/83
8/88
1,242
Utilities Copier
14,960
7/84
6/89
8►223
Airport:
Fuel Truck
22,907
12/86
6/91
22,907
Subtotal
266,143
135,730
TOTAL
$29,463,461
$25,305,413
* On September 24, 1986, the Board of Supervisors approved a supple-
mental lease purchase for $5,500,000 to increase the financing of
the construction of the Courts Building.
,t
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
REPORTS
March 25, 1987
MEETING DATE:
, 11. F. 2.
REPORT ON: ROADS ACCEPTED INTO THE STATE SECONDARY SYSTEM
ATTACHMENTS: YES ® NO C7
_.. _ 010,0
SIGNATURE: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
fI
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
de GAprp�
f
1�
$Ff
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219
March 6, 1987
Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Members of the Board:
OSCAR K. MABRY
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Secondary System
Additions
Chesterfield County
As requested in your resolution dated November 26, 1986,
the following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield
County are hereby approved, effective March 6, 1987.
T n n T MTnATQ LENGTH
TREEMONT SUBDIVISION - SECTION C
Route 2862 (Piels Road) - From 0.10 mile north
of Route 2868 to a south cul-de-sac 0.15 Mi.
Route 2868 (Green Cedar Lane) - From 0.04 mile east
of Route 2871 to 0.03 mile west of Route 2884 0.24 Mi.
Route 2878 (Alms Lane) - From 0.03 mile west
of Route 2883 to Route 2868 0.15 Mi.
Route 2877 (Alms Court) - From Route 2877 to a west
cul-de-sac 0.03 Mi.
Route 3073 (Emory Oak Lane) - From 0.03 mile north
of Route 3068 to a north cul-de-sac 0.16 Mi.
Sincerely,
Oscar K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219 OSCAR K. MABRY
COMMISSIONER March 6, 1987 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Secondary System
Addition
Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
P. 0. Box 40
CHesterfield, VA 23832
Members of the Board:
As requested in your resolution dated September 24, 1986,
the following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield
County are hereby approved, effective March 6, 1987.
T nnTM T nTTTC
LENGTH
AFTON SUBDIVISION - SECTION 7
Route 2750 (Sara Kay Drive) - From 0.02 mile west of
Route 2839-S to 0.04 mile west of Route 2839-N 0.29 Mi.
Route 2813 (Creasman Drive) - From Route 2750-S to Route
2750-N 0.14 Mi.
Sincerely,
Oscar K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
(i-Ioj
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
1
�I
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219
COMMISSIONER
March 5, 1987
Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
P. 0. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Members of the Board:
OSCAR K. MABRY
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Secondary System
Additions
Chesterfield County
As requested in your resolution dated November 26, 1986,
the following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield
County are hereby approved, effective March 5, 1987.
ADDITIONS LENGTH
COURTHOUSE WOODS - SECTION 1
Route 3154 (Husting Road) - From 0.09 mile
west of Route 3155 to 0.03 mile west of Route
0.05 Mi.
3158
Route 3158 (Nott Lane) - From 0.02 mile south
of Route 3154 to a north cul-de-sac 0.15 Mi.
Sincerely,
Oscar K. Mabr
Deputy Commissioner
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219
Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
P. 0. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Members of the Board:
March 5, 1987
OSCAR K. MABRY
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Secondary System
Additions
Chesterfield County
As requested in your resolution dated February 12., 1986,
the following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield
County are hereby approved, effective March 5, 1987.
n nM T m T nNTQ LENGTH
BERMUDA GARDENS - SECTION C
Route 833 (Hackberry Road) - From Route 698 to
0.03 mile east of Route 2488 0.14 Mi.
Route 2488 (Starpine Lane) - From 0.10 mile north
of Route 834 to Route 833 0.06 Mi.
Sincerely,
Oscar K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
y'
I '
O
��Mroa T'M1�
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219
COMMISSIONER
March 2, 1987
Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
P.O. BOX 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Members of the Board:
OSCAR K. MABRY
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Secondary System
Additions
Chesterfield County
As requested in your resolution dated April 23, 1986, the
following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County
are hereby approved, effective March 2, 1987.
ADDITIONS
ASHLEY GROVE - SECTIONS A, B & C
Route 3480 (Sunnygrove Road) From Route 649 to
an east cul-de-sac
Route 3481 (Copperpenny Road) - From 0.03 mile
south of Route 3480 to 0.05 mile north of Route 3482
Route 3482 (Copperpenny Terrace) - From Route 3481 to a
northeast cul-de-sac
Route 3483 (Copperpenny Court) - From Route 3482 to
0.13 mile southeast of Route 3482
incerely,)
-�.
��O
K. Mabry
Deputy Commissioner
LENGTH
0.29 Mi.
0.i8 Mi.
0.23 Mi.
0.13 Mi.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
ITEM NUMBER;
11.G.
Meeting with Model County Government Day Students
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
The Board will recess to meet individually with their representatives
for Model County Government Day. (11:30 a.m. - 12:00 noon).
PREPARED BY.
ATTACHMENTS: YES ❑ NO 8X
SIGNATURE: �!
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR .10C,
CHESTERFI ELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
ll.H.
MEETING DATE: March 25, 1987 ITEM NUMBER:
Ste' Lunch with League of Women Voters
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board has •scheduled a luncheon meeting with the League
of Women Voters at Magnolia Grange. See attached letter.
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: YES q NO ❑
SIGNATURE: *rnTY ADMINISTRATOR ,1�•9
M
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
OF THE RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AREA, VIRGINIA, INC.
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
February 17, 1987
Ms Joan Dolezal
Board of Supervisors Office
P . O .Box 4.0
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
The Fiscal Policy Committee of the League of Woman
Voters wishes to thank the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors
for meeting with us on March 25, 1987 for lunch, 12:00 PM
at Magnolia Grange. Six of our members plan to attend, but if
this number changes, I will call you by the middle of March.
We have already met with Mr. Hedrick and his colleagues and
Dr. Sullins and his staff. These are the issues we discussed
with them and would like to pursue with the Supervisors.
1. Planning and growth policies for Chesterfield County.
The rapid population growth of the county continues
to place strains on services, schools, and revenue
sources. We would like the Supervisors to present their
views on present and future planning and growth policies.
2. The proposed capital budget.
3. Increase in salary for county workers to maintain
parity with the private sector. The possibility
of a revision of the current salary structure.
4. The school budget: its impact on the total county budget.
5.: Revenue. The exploration of alternate sources of
revenue and the possibility of a real estate tax
increase.
Thank you so much for sharing this information with
the Supervisors. We look forward to the meeting. If you
have any questions please feel free to contact Pat Szabo, 794-2947,
or myself, Virginia Arnold, 353-14661.
Sincerely,
Virginia A. Arnol(].
Chairperson: Fiscal Policy
G� 70
k
n
M
MOBILE HOME REPORT
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, on March 25, 1987, be-
ginning at 2:00 p.m. in the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse,
Virginia, will take under consideration the granting of a Mobile Home Permit
on the parcel of land described herein.
It shall be the policy of the Board of Supervisors that approval of a mobile
home permit to park a mobile home on a parcel of land shall be subject to com-
pliance with the following Standard Conditions:
1. The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the mobile home.
2. No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use as a mobile home
site, nor shall any mobile home be used for rental property. Only
one (1) mobile home shall be permitted to be parked on an individual
lot or parcel.
3. The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front yard, and other
zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district shall be
complied with, except that no mobile home shall be located closer
than 20 feet to any existing residence.
4. No additional permanent -type living space may be added onto a mobile
home. All mobile homes shall be skirted but shall not be placed on
a permanent foundation.
5. Where public (County) water and/or sewer are available, they shall
be used.
6. Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permit, the applicant shall then
obtain the necessary permits from the Office of the Building Offi-
cial. This shall be done prior to the installation or relocation of
the mobile home.
7. Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for revoca-
tion of the Mobile Home Permit.
�bZrrr • 3 \ \ ♦ f
LifF 1�\ • . FNt
11111111 ■+■� NGRC .� \ . t
NGy-
- 1 "illll� f , s S • t
- • f v` • % • Z
V ♦
J f ♦ Ali
R B 10
f • •^
- lot: - - : c`
< % : = �► •
-
< . :10 10
a0 .
-
y i\ % - I v
\5 m r
♦ 1
vk
In
rl
- I
/ ;� v
I
/0
10 0I '
10
B
10
10
-
R
:B-2 -
10
:.:1.•. :
10
r
-• r
ROGD 11
�f ��•, ..v�
R T. 6 13 B-Z10
* - ^`
.. O_-lllnnll+ulnnu■llllllll+l■+l■lul■ ■i■■.l _
10
10, - OM 2 - ♦10
10
10
/
: r�••� : : It : •
.0
Ir
10 c 10,
10
100
Cj
% ♦ 10
opO°o : i o♦
10
a
COil,6♦ S -- T ap. o -
G :\. ' •��lots■. REYME10
P°P° z ♦ °`' 9� 87SO48
. •. M. H.
s : : o. v
S H. 23
ENNAL
_ mac♦
e- 3 _
f Q — POP M : ♦ o^a •
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, on Wednesday, March 25, 1987,
beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse,
Chesterfield, Virginia, will take under consideration the rezoning and the
granting of Conditional Uses on the parcels of land described herein.
*86S145: In Matoaca Magisterial District, JOHN E. HAMILTON, JR. requests
amendment to Conditional Use (Case 78S204) relative to the transfer of land-
fill operation rights and extension of time period of operation. This request
lies in an Agricultural (A) District on a 40 acre parcel fronting approximate-
ly 800 feet on the west line of Taylor Road, approximately 1,600 feet south of
Hembrick Road. Tax Map 123 (1) Parcel 13 (Sheets 35, 36, and 37).
*86S158: In Bermuda Magisterial District, DAVID A. BANTY AND GEORGE P.
EMERSON, JR. request rezoning from Agricultural (A), Residential (R-15), and
Community Business (B-2) to Convenience Business (B-1) with Conditional Use
Planned Development to permit use and bulk exceptions on a 4.6 acre parcel
fronting approximately 408 feet on the north line of West Hundred Road, ap-
proximately 1,150 feet west of Meadowville Road. Tax Map 117-11 (1) Part of
Parcel 24; Tax Map 117-11 (2) Riverbend, Section A, Lot 11; Tax Map 117-12 (1)
Part of Parcel 20; and Tax Map 117-12 (2) Riverbend, Section A, Lots 12, 13,
and 14 (Sheet 33).
87SO08: In Midlothian Magisterial District, COLSON AND COLSON CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY requests Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a convales-
cent/rest home and bulk exceptions in a Residential (R-15) District on a 3.8
acre parcel fronting approximately 302 feet on the west line of Twinridge
Lane, approximately 280 feet north of North Providence Road. Tax Map 18-15
(1) Parcels 4, 5, and 32 (Sheet 8).
87SO09: In Midlothian Magisterial District, FRANK L. HEREFORD requests rezon-
ing from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (B-2) of 1.1 acres, and to
Office Business (0) of 1.4 acres with Conditional Use Planned Development,
plus amendment to previously granted Conditional Use Planned Development (Case
83S188). This request encompasses a total of 5.2 acres, fronting approximate-
ly 500 feet on the east line of Courthouse Road, approximately 380 feet south
of Midlothian Turnpike; also fronting approximately 300 feet on the west line
of Branchway Road, approximately 270 feet south of Midlothian Turnpike. Tax
Map 16-12 (1) Parcel 29 and Tax Map 17-9 (2) Avon Estate, Lots 9, 10, and 11
(Sheets 7 and 8).
87SO14: In Clover Hill Magisterial District, BEXLEY WEST ASSOCIATES requests
a Conditional Use to permit a recreational facility in a Residential (R-15)
District on a 2.2 acre parcel lying approximately 400 feet northwest of the
western terminus of Lockshire Drive. Tax Map 39-13 (8) Bexley West, Section
1, Block A, Lot 31 (Sheet 14).
*These cases were deferred at a previous session by the Board of Supervisors
to their March 25, 1987, meeting.
87SO15: In Midlothian Magisterial District, ARTHUR PEMBERTON requests Condi-
tional Use Planned Development to permit use and bulk exceptions in a Communi-
ty Business (B-2) District on a 0.5 acre parcel fronting approximately 192
feet on the south line of Midlothian Turnpike, approximately 160 feet west of
Mount Pisgah Drive. Tax Map 16-9 (1) Part of Parcel 29 (Sheet 7).
87SO17: In Matoaca Magisterial District, R. LARRY AND KATIE G. TURNER request
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (M-1) with Conditional Use
Planned Development on a 7.4 acre parcel fronting approximately 115 feet on
the south line of Hull Street Road, approximately 50 feet east of Speeks
Drive. Tax Map 49-10 (1) Parcel 9 (Sheet 14).
87SO18: In Matoaca Magisterial District, BRECK CAINE requests Conditional Use
Planned Development to permit use (greenhouse and nursery) and bulk exceptions
in an Agricultural (A) District on a 14 acre parcel fronting approximately 400
feet on the east line of Baldwin Creek Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of
Hull Street Road. Tax Map 73 (1) Part of Parcel 90 (Sheet 19).
87SO19: In Matoaca Magisterial District, CLOVER HILL CORPORATION requests
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15) on a 21.3 acre parcel
lying at the western terminus of Singer Road. Tax Map 76 (1) Part of Parcel
13 (Sheets 20 and 29).
87SO21: In Midlothian Magisterial District, SOMMERVILLE DEVELOPMENT CORPO-
RATION requests amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 80SO92)
relative to permitted uses and buffer requirements in a Light Industrial (M-1)
District on a 38 acre parcel fronting in two (2) places on the north line of
Midlothian Turnpike for a total of approximately 2,200 feet, across from
Otterdale Road. Tax Map 15 (1) Parcels 34 and 36 (Sheet 7).
87SO22: In Bermuda Magisterial District, WOODROW WALLER requests rezoning
from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3) on a 0.6 acre parcel
fronting approximately 106 feet on the west line of Jefferson Davis Highway,
also fronting approximately 107 feet on the east line of Perrymont Road, and
located approximately 392 feet north of Willis Road. Tax Map 81-8 (1) Parcel
16 (Sheet 23).
87SO23: In Clover Hill Magisterial District, BRANDON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) on a 14.2 acre
parcel plus amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 84S118)
relative to access on another parcel. This request lies approximately 150
feet off the east and west lines of Sunset Hills Drive. Tax Map 38-14 (1)
Parcels 3, 4, and 27 (Sheet 14).
87SO24: In Matoaca Magisterial District, CHESTERFIELD MEADOWS SHOPPING CENTER
ASSOCIATES, L.P. requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Convenience Busi-
ness (B-1) of 1.5 acres, amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development
(Case 84SO82) on an adjacent 5.5 acre tract zoned Convenience Business (B-1),
plus Conditional Use Planned Development on the entire 7.0 acre tract. This
request fronts approximately 380 feet on the east line of Iron Bridge Road
across from Greenyard Road. Tax Map 96-9 (1) Parcel 7 and Part of Parcel 6,
and Tax Map 96-13 (1) Parcel 2 (Sheet 31).
2 BSJAN7/MAR25A
% �w ;40
4
87SO25: In Clover Hill Magisterial District, COWLES R. AND KATHERINE GARRISON
request amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 745021) to
permit a bulk exception (setback) in a Residential (R-7) District on a 0.2
acre parcel fronting approximately 62 feet on the northwest line of Northwich
Terrace, approximately 460 feet southwest of Northwich Road. Tax Map 61-4 (7)
Northwich, Section 2, Lot 48 (Sheet 20).
87SO26: In Matoaca Magisterial District, FIRST VIRGINIA BANK AND INVESTORS
SAVINGS BANK request amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Cases
845082 and 855082) relative to signs. This request lies in a Convenience
Business (B-1) District on a 3 acre parcel fronting approximately 450 feet on
the east line of Iron Bridge Road, also fronting approximately 200 feet on
Centralia Road, and located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of
these roads. Tax Map 96-9 (1) Part of Parcel 20 (Sheet 31).
87SO33: In Midlothian Magisterial District, SIGMA G.J. ASSOCIATES/PETULA
ASSOCIATES, LIMITED request amendments to Conditional Use Planned Developments
(Cases 825066 and 835091) relative to building heights. This request lies in
an Office Business (0) District on a 153 acre parcel fronting approximately 40
feet on the south line of Jahnke Road, also fronting approximately 4,300 feet
on west line of Chippenham Parkway, and located in the southwest quadrant of
the intersection of these roads, also fronting the east and west lines of
Chinaberry Boulevard. Tax Map 19-1 (1) Parcel 16 and Tax Map 19-9 (1) Parcel
8 (Sheet 8).
Copies of these amendments are on file in the Planning Department at the
Chesterfield Administration Building, Room 203, Chesterfield, Virginia, for
public examination between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. of each regu-
lar business day.
APPLICANTS AND/OR AGENT MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING.
All persons favoring or opposing the granting of the above requests are invit-
ed to appear at the time and place herein stated.
--mot
Thomas E. Jacobson, Director
Planning Department
3 BSJAN7/MAR25A
t
March 25, 1987 BS
ADDENDUM
86S145
John E. Hamilton, Jr.
Matoaca Magisterial District
West line of Taylor Road
The applicant has expressed concern that the transfer of the ownership of the
property may not occur for several weeks following the Board of Supervisors'
action on the application. Amendment to Condition 1 has been requested to
allow the Conditional Use to be transferred into the name of Taylor Road
Landfill, Inc. at such time that the property is transferred. Such an amend-
ment would allow Horace H. Hines, II to continue to operate the landfill under
the existing Conditional Use (Case 78S204) until the property is transferred
to Taylor Road Landfill, Inc. Staff, therefore, recommends amendment to
Condition 1 as follows:
1. At such time that the property ownership is transferred to Taylor
Road Landfill, Inc., the Conditional Use shall also be transferred
to Taylor Road Landfill, Inc. Following transfer to Taylor Road
Landfill, Inc., the Conditional Use shall not be transferrable, nor
run with the land. (P)
86S145/BSAPR7/MAR25GG
November-18T-1986-GPG
Beeember-+9;-+986-B6
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
86S145
John E. Hamilton, Jr.
Matoaca Magisterial District
West line of Taylor Road
REQUEST: Amend Conditional Use (Case 78S204) to permit the transfer of land-
fill operation rights and extend the time period for the Conditional_
Use.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGES 1 AND 2.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A. The existing landfill operation complies with all conditions imposed
through Case 78S204. Further, the operation has not had any appar-
ent adverse impact on adjacent properties.
B. Since the proposed Western Planning Area Land Use and Transportation
Plan, designates the request parcel and surrounding area for ag-
ricultural/forestal use, area residential development in the near
future is anticipated to be limited. Therefore, extension of the
time period for the landfill operation would not adversely affect
future area development.
C. The conditions, as originally imposed, insure proper operation and
reclamation, as well as land use compatibility.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
rnMnTTTnMq
(STAFF/CPC) 1. This Conditional Use shall be granted to and for Taylor
Road Landfill, Inc. exclusively and shall not be transfer-
rable nor run with the land. (P)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 1 of Condi-
tional Use, Case 78S204.)
(STAFF) 2. This Conditional Use shall be granted for a period of time
not to exceed ten (10) years from date of approval and may
be renewed upon satisfactory reapplication and demon-
stration that the operation has been of no detriment to
adjacent and area properties. (P)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 6 of Condi-
tional Use, Case 78S204.)
(CPC) 2. This Conditional Use shall be granted for a period of time
not to exceed five (5) years from date of approval and may
be renewed upon satisfactory reapplication and demon-
stration that the operation has been of no detriment to
adjacent and area properties. (CPC)
NOTE: All other conditions of Conditional Use, Case 78S204, remain
applicable.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: West line of Taylor Road, approximately
1,600 feet south of Hembrick Road. Tax Map
123 (1) Parcel 13 (Sheets 35, 36, and 37).
Existing Zoning: A with Conditional Use to permit a landfill
Size: 40 acres
Existing Land Use: Landfill
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North, South, East, and West: A; Vacant
Utilities: Public utilities are not available to serve
the property nor are public utilities
required for the proposed use.
Environmental Engineering: There are no drainage or erosion problems
existing or anticipated.
Fire Service: Clover Hill Fire Station, Company V . At
present, fire service capability is ade-
quate.
General Plan
(Western Planning Area
- Land Use and Transporta-
tion Plan - Proposed): Agricultural/forestal
Transportation: The proposed development will have a mini-
mal impact on area traffic patterns.
2 "SS145/BSJAN7/MAR25G
nTSCTTSSTON
Amendment to a Conditional Use (Case 78S204) for a landfill is requested
to permit the transfer of the permit to a new operator and to extend the
time limitation for operation of the landfill. Specifically, conditions
of approval grant the existing Conditional Use to and for Horace H.
Hines, II and require that the landfill activity cease no later than
December 13, 1988. The current request is to allow transfer of the
Conditional Use to Taylor Road Landfill, Inc. and extend the time limita-
tion for an additional ten (10) years from the date of approval of this
request.
The existing landfill has been inspected by both State and County
agencies and has been found to be in compliance with all previously
imposed conditions, as well as State regulations. Further, the existing
operation has had no apparent adverse impact on adjacent or area prop-
erties. Since the proposed Western Planning Area Land Use and Transpor-
tation Plan designates the request parcel and surrounding area for ag-
ricultural/forestal use, large scale residential development is not
anticipated in the near future. Therefore, the continued operation
should not adversely affect future area residential development.
The conditions as originally imposed will remain applicable and are
designed to insure that the operation of the landfill will have minimal
impact on surrounding properties, and that the site will ultimately be
reclaimed. Conditions 1 and 2, as recommended herein, allow transfer of
the Conditional Use to Taylor Road Landfill, Inc. and extend the time
period for ten (10) years.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (11/18/86):
On motion of Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. Rowe, the Commission recommend-
ed approval of this request, subject to the conditions on pages 1 and 2.
AYES: Messrs. Miller, Belcher, Cowan, and Rowe
ABSENT: Mr. O'Connor
Board of Supervisors Meeting (12/10/86):
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board deferred
this request for ninety (90) days to allow the applicant to meet with Mr.
Horace Hines, owner of the subject property.
AYES: Unanimous.
3 86S145/BSJAN7/MAR25G
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
06S145/BSJAN7/MAR25G
l
1
1
Y
M r4`_O/
li
RNER.
N
Y
86S 145
_ AMEND C.U.
' SH. 35/36 & 37
y
�J
•
s
s
.'
LM
M
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
865158
Beeeabee--j63-4!986-GPG
3saeser�►-P6 ;-�98�-6P6
Peb�c�er�-�6s-}98�-BS
March 25, 1987 BS
David A. Banty and George P. Emerson, Jr.
Bermuda Magisterial District
North line of West Hundred Road
REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A), Residential (R-15), and Community
Business (B-2) to Convenience Business (B-1) with a Conditional Use
Planned Development to. permit use and bulk exceptions. An
office/shopping complex is planned.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGES 1 THROUGH 11.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A. Through the Conditional Use Planned Development process, the Commis-
sion and Board can impose conditions to ensure quality development
and proper land use transition. Although the Eastern Area Land Use
and Transportation Plan designates the property for light industrial
use, the recommended conditions ensure that the spirit and intent of
the Plan is met and that a proper transition between residential
properties to the north, commercial uses to the east, and future
development along Route 10 is made.
B. The proposed zoning and land use are representative of development
trends along the Route 10 Corridor.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
NDED SOLELY BY
AND THE COMMISSION
ONLYCONDITIOAS'CPCH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS STAFF. CON RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Charles C. Townes and Associates, P.C., dated
December 23, 1986, and the revised Textual Statement,
dated December 29, 1986, shall be considered the Master
Plan. (P)
(STAFF) 2. A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
northern boundary of the site. This buffer shall consist
of landscaping, having a sufficient initial height and of
a species which will provide year-round screening. Other
than utilities which run generally perpendicular through
the buffer, and a fence, if desired, there shall be no
facilities permitted in this buffer. A landscaping plan
depicting this requirement shall be submitted to the Plan-
ning Department for approval in conjunction with final
site plan review. (P)
(CPC) 2. A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
northern boundary of the site. This buffer shall consist
of landscaping, having a sufficient initial height and of
a species which will provide year-round screening. Other
than utilities which run generally perpendicular through
the buffer, and a fence, if desired, there shall be no
facilities permitted in this buffer. A landscaping plan
depicting this requirement shall be submitted to the Plan-
ning Department for approval in conjunction with final
site plan review. (CPC)
(STAFF/CPC) 3. In addition to Convenience Business (B-1) uses, the fol-
lowing Community Business (B-2) uses shall be permitted in
Building "C," as depicted on the Master Plan:
A. Health clubs
B. Print shops
Also, in Building "C," individual stores and/or shops
shall be permitted a 1,200 square foot exception to the
12,000 square foot limitation.
Pads "A" and "B" and Buildings "A" and "B" shall be limit-
ed to those uses permitted in the Convenience Business
(B-1) District. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 4. Signs shall comply with the requirements of the Special
Sign District for shopping centers in a Convenience Busi-
ness (B-1) District. Landscaping shall be provided around
the base of all freestanding signs. Sign colors and style
shall be compatible with the architectural style of the
buildings. Prior to the erection of any signs, a complete
sign package depicting these requirements shall be submit-
ted to the Planning Department for approval. (P)
(Note: This condition would permit only one freestanding
sign.)
(STAFF/CPC) 5. Yards. The following yard requirement shall apply:
(a) Setbacks along Route 10. All buildings and drives
shall have a minimum seventy-five foot setback from
2 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
M
M
T the proposed right-of-way of Route 10 as indicated on
the Chesterfield General Plan, as amended. Parking
areas shall have a minimum one hundred foot setback
from the proposed right-of-way of Route 10. The
parking area setback may be reduced to seventy-five
feet when parking areas are located to the side or
rear of buildings. Within these setbacks, landscap-
ing shall be provided in accordance with Condition 10
(f) .
(b) Front yard. The front yard setback for buildings,
drives, and parking areas shall be a minimum of forty
feet from River's Bend Road.
(c) Side yards. The side yard setbacks for buildings,
drives, and parking areas shall be a minimum of
thirty feet. The minimum corner side yard shall be
forty feet. One foot shall be added to each side
yard for each three feet that the building height
adjacent thereto exceeds forty-five feet or three
stories, whichever is less, subject, however, to the
provisions of Section 21-27 of the Zoning Ordinance.
(d) Rear yard. The minimum rear yard setback for build-
ings, drives, and parking areas shall be fifty feet.
One foot shall be added to each rear yard for each
three feet that the building height adjacent thereto
exceeds forty-five feet or three stories, whichever
is less, subject, however, to the provisions of
Section 21-27 of the Zoning Ordinance. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 6. Permitted Variations in Yard Requirements.
The required minimum yards may be reduced with the pro-
vision of additional landscaping:
(STAFF/CPC) (a) Setbacks along Route 10. The required setback for
buildings and drives along Route 10 may be reduced to
fifty (50) feet with the provision of landscaping in
accordance with Condition 10 (g) (3), "Perimeter
Landscaping C." The required setback for parking
areas may be reduced to fifty (50) feet with the
provision of landscaping in accordance with Condition
10 (g) (3), "Perimeter Landscaping C," and when such
parking areas are located to the side and rear of
buildings.
(STAFF/CPC) (b) Front yard. The required front yard setback along
River's Bend Road may be reduced to twenty-five (25)
feet with the provision of landscaping in accordance
with Condition 10 (g) (3), "Perimeter Landscaping C."
3 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
(STAFF/CPC) (c) Side yard. The required side yard may be reduced to
ten (10) feet with the provision of landscaping in
accordance with Condition 10 (g) (2), "Perimeter
Landscaping B."
(CPC) (d) Rear yard. The required rear yard may be reduced to
thirty (30) feet with the provision of the
buffer described in Condition 2.
(STAFF/CPC) 7. Utility lines underground_. All utility lines such as
electric, telephone, CATV, or other similar lines shall be
installed underground. This requirement shall apply to
lines serving individual sites as well as to utility lines
necessary within the project. All junction and access
boxes shall be screened with appropriate landscaping. All
utility pad fixtures and meters shall be shown on the site
plan. The necessity for utility connections, meter boxes,
etc., shall be recognized and integrated with the archi-
tectural elements of the site plan. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 8. Loading areas. Sites shall be designed and buildings
shall be oriented so that loading areas are not visible
from the adjacent residential property to the north or
from any public right of way. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 9. Driveways and parking areas. Driveways and parking areas
shall be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete, or
other similar material. Surface treated parking areas and
drives shall be prohibited. Concrete curb and gutter
shall be installed around the perimeter of all driveways
and parking areas. Drainage shall be designed so as not
to interfere with pedestrian traffic. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 10. Landscaping Requirements.
(a) Purpose and Intent.
A comprehensive landscaping program for the site is
essential for the visual enhancement of the Corridor;
and to protect and promote the appearance, character,
and economic values of land along the Corridor and
surrounding neighborhoods. The purpose and intent of
such landscaping requirements is also to reduce the
visibility of paved areas from adjacent properties
and streets, moderate climatic effects, minimize
noise and glare, and enhance public safety by defin-
ing spaces to influence traffic movement. Landscap-
ing will reduce the amount of storm water runoff and
provide transition between neighboring properties.
4 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
M
M
(b) Landscaping Plan and Planting Requirements.
(1) A landscaping plan shall be submitted in con-
junction with site plan review.
(2) Such landscaping plan shall be drawn to scale,
including dimensions and distances, and clearly
delineate all existing and proposed parking
spaces or other vehicle areas, access aisles,
driveways, and the location, size and descrip-
tion of all landscaping materials.
(c) Plant Materials Specifications.
(1) Quality.
-- All plant materials shall be living and in a
healthy condition. Plant materials used in
conformance with the provision of these speci-
fications shall conform to the standards of the
most recent edition of the "American Standard
for Nursery Stock," published by the American
Association of Nurserymen.
(2) Size and Type.
(a) Small Deciduous Trees. Small deciduous
trees shall be of a species having an
average minimum mature crown spread of
greater than twelve (12) feet. A minimum
caliper of at least two and one-half (2
1/2) inches at the time of planting shall
be required.
(b) Large Deciduous Trees. Large deciduous
trees shall be of a species having an
average minimum mature crown spread of
greater than thirty (30) feet. A minimum
caliper of at least three and one-half (3
1/2) inches at the time of planting shall
be required.
(c) Evergreen trees. Evergreen trees shall
have a minimum height of five (5) feet at
the time of planting.
(d) Medium shrubs. Shrubs and hedge forms
shall have a minimum height of two (2) feet
at the time of planting.
(3) Landscaping Design.
5 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
(a) Generally, planting required by this sec-
tion should be in an irregular line and
spaced at random.
(b) Clustering of plant and tree species shall
be required to provide a pleasing composi-
tion and mix of vegetation.
(c) Decorative walls and fences may be inte-
grated into any landscaping program. The
use of such walls or fences, when having a
minimum height of three (3) feet, may
reduce the amount of required plant mate-
rials at the discretion of the Director of
Planning.
(4) Tree Preservation.
(a) Preservation of existing trees is en-
couraged to provide continuity, improved
buffering ability, pleasing scale and image
along the Corridor.
(b) Any healthy existing tree may be included
for credit towards the requirements of this
Condition.
(d) Maintenance.
(1) The owner, or his agent, shall be responsible
for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of
all landscaping materials as may be required.
(2) All plant material shall be tended and main-
tained in a healthy growing condition and free
from refuse and debris at all times. All un-
healthy, dying or dead -plant materials shall be
replaced during the next planting season.
(3) All landscaped areas shall be provided with a
readily available water supply. The utilization
of underground storage chambers to collect
runoff to be later used to irrigate plant mate-
rials is encouraged.
(e) Installation and Bonding Requirements.
(1) All landscaping shall be installed in a sound,
workmanship -like manner and according to accept-
ed, good planting practices and procedures.
Landscaped areas shall require protection from
vehicular encroachment by such means as, but not
6 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
limited to, wheel stops or concrete or
bituminous curbs.
(2) Where landscaping is required, no certificate of
occupancy shall be issued until the required
landscaping is completed in accordance with the
approved landscape plan. When the occupancy of
a structure is desired prior to the completion
of the required landscaping, a certificate of
occupancy may be issued only if the owner or
developer provides to the County a form of
surety satisfactory to the Planning Department
in an amount equal to the costs of the remaining
plant materials, related materials and installa-
tion costs.
(3) All required landscaping shall be installed and
approved by the first planting season following
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the
bond shall be forfeited to the County.
(f) Arterial Frontage Landscaping.
Landscaping shall be required along Route 10 within
the required setback and shall be provided except
where driveways or other openings may be necessary.
The minimum required landscaping for this setback
shall be provided as per "Perimeter Landscaping B"
below.
(g) Perimeter Landscaping.
Landscaping shall be provided at the outer boundaries
or in the required yards, except where driveways or
other openings may be required. The minimum required
landscaping for all outer boundaries of any lot or
parcel shall be provided as per "Perimeter Landscap-
ing A" below. There shall be different landscaping
requirements as identified herein, which shall be
provided as follows:
(1) Perimeter Landscaping A.
(a) At least one small deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen for each fifty lineal feet shall
be planted within the setback area.
(b) At least one medium shrub for each twenty
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
7 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
(c) Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
(2) Perimeter Landscaping B.
(a) At least one large deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen for each thirty lineal feet shall
be planted within the setback area.
(b) At least one small deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet shall be planted within
the setback area.
(c) At least one medium shrub for each fifteen
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(d) Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
OR:
(a) A minimum three (3) foot high undulating
berm, and
(b) Perimeter Landscaping A.
(3) Perimeter Landscaping C.
(a) At least one large deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen tree for each thirty lineal feet
shall be planted within the setback area.
(b) At least one small deciduous tree for each
thirty lineal feet shall be planted within
the setback area.
(c) At least one medium shrub for each ten
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(d) Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
OR:
(a) A minimum four (4) foot high undulating
berm, and
(b) Perimeter Landscaping B.
8 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
M
M
(h) Landscaping Standards for Parking Areas.
(1) Interior parking area landscaping.
(a) The parking area(s) shall have at least
twenty (20) square feet of interior land-
scaping for each space. Each required
landscaped area shall contain a minimum of
100 square feet and have a minimum dimen-
sion of at least ten feet. With the pro-
vision of this landscaping, parking space
size may be reduced to 9.5 x 18 feet or
185.5 square feet.
(b) The primary landscaping material used in
parking areas shall be trees which provide
shade or are capable of providing shade at
maturity. Each required landscaped area
shall include at .least one small tree, as
outlined in this Condition. The total
number of trees shall not be less than one
for each 200 square feet, or fraction
thereof, of required interior landscaped
area. The remaining area shall be land-
scaped with shrubs and other vegetative
material to compliment the tree
landscaping.
(c) Landscaping areas shall be reasonably
dispersed throughout, located so as to
divide and break up the expanse of paving.
The area designated as required setbacks
shall not be calculated as required land-
scaped area.
(2) Peripheral parking area landscaping.
(a) Peripheral landscaping shall be required
along any side of a parking area that abuts
land not in the right of way of a street
such that:
A landscaped strip at least ten (10) feet
in width shall be located between the
parking area and the abutting property
lines, except where driveways or other
openings may be required. Continuous hedge
forms or at least one small tree, as
outlined in this Condition, shall be plant-
ed in the landscaped strip for each fifty
lineal feet. (P)
9 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
(STAFF/CPC) 11. All exterior lights shall be arranged and installed so
that the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed
0.5 foot candles above background measured at the lot line
of any adjoining residential district or Route 10. Light-
ing standards shall be of a directional type capable of
shielding light source from direct view. A lighting plan
shall be submitted to the Planning Department in conjunc-
tion with final site plan review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 12. The architectural treatment of all buildings on the site
shall be such that no building facade (whether front,
side, or rear) will consist of architectural materials
inferior in quality, appearance, or detail to any other
facade of the same building. No portion of a building
constructed of unadorned cinder block or corrugated and/or
sheet metal shall be visible from any adjoining property
or Route 10. Mechanical equipment, whether ground -level
or rooftop, shall be shielded and screened from public
view and designed to be perceived as an integral part of
the building. Detailed renderings depicting these re-
quirements shall be submitted to the Planning Commission
in conjunction with schematic plan review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC)
13. In conjunction with schematic plan review, an overall
access plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
Transportation Department for the area north of Route 10
from Harbour East Development to the proposed River's Bend
Road. The developer shall grant cross easement(s) to
allow access to adjacent properties to the west. The
exact location of cross easement(s) shall be determined at
the time of schematic review. (T&CPC)
(STAFF/CPC)
14. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, 100 feet of
right of way, measured from the centerline of Route 10,
shall be dedicated to and for Chesterfield County, free
and unrestricted. (T)
(STAFF/CPC)
15. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, additional
pavement, curb and gutter shall be constructed along Route
10 for the entire property frontage. (T)
(STAFF)
16. Public sewer shall be used. (U)
(CPC) 16. At such time as the Banty property (i.e., Parcel 11 on Tax
Map 117-11 (2) and Parcels 12 and 13 on Tax Map 117-12
(2)) is developed, public sewer shall be extended and all
buildings on this site shall be connected to public sewer.
(CPC)
(STAFF/CPC) 17. Prior to, or in conjunction with, final site plan review,
a utility easement shall be dedicated along Route 10 to
10 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
M
9
accommodate construction of a parallel force main. The
width of the easement shall be determined at the time of
site plan review. (U)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: North line of West Hundred Road, approxi-
mately 1,150 feet west of Meadowville Road.
Tax Map 117-11 (1) Part of Parcel 24; Tax
Map 117-11 (2) Riverbend, Section A, Lot
11; Tax Map 117-12 (1) Part of Parcel 20;
and Tax Map 117-12 (2) Riverbend, Section
A, Lots 12, 13, and 14 (Sheet 33).
Existing Zoning: A and A with Conditional Use; R-15 with
proffered conditions; and B-2
Size: 4.6 acres
Existing Land Use: Single family residential or vacant
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - R-15 with proffered conditions;
Under development for single family
residential use
South - A; Vacant
East - B-2; Day Care Center
West - A; Single family residential
Utilities: 12 inch water line located along Route 10.
Use of public water required.
Lies in Johnson Creek sewage drainage area.
Existing 18 inch sewer line located approx-
imately 270 feet south of site. Use of
public sewer recommended (Condition 16).
Extension of public sewer requires acquisi-
tion of off -site easements.
Environmental Engineering: Terrain has slight slope and is well to
moderately well drained. Property drains
to the south to roadside ditch along Route
10, then under Route 10 south to Johnson
Creek. Existing culvert under Route 10 is
in need of cleaning out. The existing
culvert may not have capacity to handle
additional runoff. This development could
aggravate existing situation. Existing
culverts and downstream channel should be
analyzed for adequacy. Concrete curb and
gutter should be installed around the
perimeter of all driveways and parking
areas to facilitate proper drainage (Condi-
tion 9). The request parcel lies within
11 865158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
Johnson Creek Drainage District. The
developer must contribute a pro rata share
for drainage improvements. The developer
must install storm sewer along Route 10 as
required by the condition(s) of tentative
subdivision approval for Riverbend Subdivi-
sion, Phase I.
Fire Service: Dutch Gap Fire Station, Company #14. At
present, fire service capability is ade-
quate. County water and fire hydrants must
be provided in compliance with nationally
recognized standards.
General Plan
(Eastern Area Land Use
and Transportation Plan):
Light Industrial
Transportation:
The proposed development could generate
approximately 7,600 average daily trips.
These vehicles will be distributed along
West Hundred Road which had a 1985 traffic
count of 20,870 vehicles per day. In the
vicinity of this request (north of Route
10, between Harbour East and the
Meadowville/Route 10 intersection), there
are numerous small parcels with frontage
along Route 10. A Master Access Plan for
this area should be developed incorporating
all of these parcels, identifying specific
access locations to Route 10. By develop-
ing a Master Plan, access to Route 10 could
be, better controlled, thereby protecting
the integrity of the arterial. If indi-
vidual access is approved for each small
parcel, access problems similar to those
along Midlothian Turnpike will occur.
Unless Route 288 can be extended from I-95
to I-295, Route 10 will be the only major
arterial to serve east/west traffic flow in
the eastern section of the County. Even if
Route 288 is extended, Route 10 will still
carry significant volumes of traffic. The
County should, therefore, protect the
traffic carrying capacity of Route 10 by
allowing adequate access to properties, but
at the same time, controlling access points
to Route 10, limiting the number and prox-
imity of crossovers and requiring access
between parcels (Condition 13). Staff and
VDOT recommends that the existing crossover
which aligns with the western property line
be closed.
12 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
n
9
DISCUSSION
Should this development be approved, addi-
tional pavement, curb and gutter should be
constructed along Route 10 for its entire
property frontage to facilitate turning
movements (Condition 15). An east/west
"service road" should be developed on this
site. This service road should be designed
and constructed with no direct parking
adjacent to the travel lanes. Access for
this development should be in accordance
with the approved "service road" plan
(Condition 13). These recommendations may
require major modifications to the proposed
Master Plan. The Eastern Area Land Use and
Transportation Plan identifies Route 10 as
a major arterial with an ultimate right of
way width of 100 to 200 feet. Right of way
dedication should be in accordance with
this Plan. (Condition 14)
A revised Master Plan was submitted follow-
ing the Commission's December meeting. The
revised plan begins to address the concept
of an overall access plan for the area.
However, further consideration should be
given to the exact width of the internal
connector and the number of access points
to the connector. These details can be
further addressed at the time the overall
access plan is reviewed and approved.
Rezoning from Agricultural (A), Residential (R-15), and Community Busi-
ness (B-2) to Convenience Business (B-1) with a Conditional Use Planned
Development is requested. Offices and a retail shopping center are
planned.
The applicants are requesting use exceptions. Specifically, in Building
"C," the following exceptions have been requested:
a. Health clubs
b. Printing shops
Property to the north of the request parcel i-s zoned Residential (R-15)
and is currently under development for a 258 lot residential subdivision.
Property to the west and south are zoned Agricultural (A) with existing
single family residences and vacant. Property to the east is occupied by
a day care center and is zoned Community Business (B-2).
The Eastern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan designates the request
parcels for light industrial use. However, the proposed zoning and land
use are representative of area development. Further, it should be noted
that since adoption of the Eastern Area Plan, some of the area to the
13 865158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
north which was designated for industrial land use has now been zoned for
residential development. Given the resulting depth between the residen-
tial development and Route 10, quality industrial development may be
difficult to achieve. The recommended conditions will minimize the
impact on adjacent residential development and address concerns relative
to access, turning movements, quality of development and the
proliferation of signs along Route 10.
Condition 3, while permitting health clubs and print shops, minimizes the
impact on adjacent residential properties by limiting other development
to less intensive and obtrusive uses. A fifty (50) foot buffer (Condi-
tion 2) together with interior and perimeter landscaping (Conditions 10)
will afford protection to adjacent residential development and enhance
the overall appearance of the project. The landscaping requirements and
the additional development standards recommended in Conditions 5 through
10 are consistent with those proposed for the Route 10 and Route 360
Overlay Districts. The imposition of sign limitations consistent with
the requirements of the Special Sign District will help to minimize the
proliferation of signs along Route 10. Signs should be compatible with
the architectural style of the buildings. (Condition 4)
Similarly, consideration should be given to
buildings to ensure quality site design and
transition between existing day care center
development to the north (Condition 12). Lo
will also serve to minimize the impact of
residences and vehicular traffic along Route
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (12/16/86):
the architectural style of
to promote an architectural
to the east and residential
w level, directional lighting
the development on adjacent
10 (Condition 11).
The Commission deferred this request for thirty (30) days to allow the
applicant, Staff, and the Bermuda District Commissioner to meet and
discuss the recommended conditions.
Applicants' Representative, Staff, and the Bermuda District Commissioner
(12/22/86):
A meeting was held to discuss the recommended conditions. The appli-
cants' representative requested modifications to Condition 2 relative to
the buffer width adjacent to residential zoning. Staff noted that the
recommended buffer was consistent with past actions on similarly situated
commercial properties. The applicants' representative also requested
that Condition 16 be modified to allow Buildings "A" and "B" to utilize
septic tanks and drainfields, require public sewer for all other develop-
ment, and that Buildings "A" and "B" be connected when public sewer is
extended. The Utilities Department continues to recommend extension of
public sewer. Also, Staff discussed the concept of the overall access
plan, as recommended in Condition 13.
14 865158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
M
9
Applicant (12/30/86):
A revised Master Plan and Textual Statement was submitted and are dis-
cussed herein.
Planning Commission Meeting (1/20/87):
On motion of Mr. Rowe, seconded by Mr. Cowan, the Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to the conditions on pages 1 through
11.
AYES: Messrs. Miller, O'Connor, Cowan, and Rowe.
ABSENT: Mr. Belche r--
Board of Supervisors Meeting (2/25/87):
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board deferred this
request for thirty (30) days to allow the applicants to meet with the
Utilities Department to discuss extension of public sewer.
AYES: Messrs. Daniel, Applegate, Dodd, and Mrs. Girone.
ABSENT: Mr. Mayes.
Utilities Department (3/18/87):
Based upon discussions with the applicants, the Utilities Department is
of the opinion that use of public sewer is feasible and believes that the
developers concur with these findings.
It has been determined that the existing Johnson Creek trunk sewer is
actually closer to the sites than originally indicated. At the most
logical point to extend sewer to the north side of Route 10, and serve
both sites, the existing trunk is only 270 feet away. This extension
could serve an area (likely to develop commercially) approximately 500
feet deep, extending west from Meadowville Road a distance of approxi-
mately 3,000 feet. In addition, it appears that the portion of the
proposed Riverbend residential development located southwest of the large
ravine which divides the property, could also be served from this source.
The Eastern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan reflects a mixture of
general industrial, commercial, and medium to high density residential
uses for this area. Public sewer must be extended if these types of
developments are to occur. Therefore, the Utilities Department recom-
mends that Condition 16, as recommended by Staff on page 10, be imposed.
15 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
This condition would require that public sewer be extended to serve the
entire property.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
16 86S158/BSAPR7/MAR25H
R-7
/
RT. 10
_-- - _- - WEST HUNDRED RD.
tow
000a
Z A
A E A
MIDWAY FARMS
�O,
(v0
r
zc
86S158
REZ• A,
B—
..►•'' .•' .�' u
,,.•v'''� R-/2
A
'Oo
c
i
i
c ,
c
R-15 & B— 2 TO
WITH C.U.PD.
0
- A -
LOT 9
FUTor DEVELOPMENT
R-15
-A-
LOT /0
N
R/ S BEND
R-l5
30' BUFFER STRIP
.al
lW f
M W Al G ♦
tl y ^ M
e
Z ces! �ocma
Ka
SITE I PAD B SITE PAD A 1
0.5 Acre 10*5 Acre K) « C
BLDG. A v ^e
R/V&?8ZV0 SXr,0V A N2688.aLR. m
3
50' BUIU[*G SMAdK LINE 3
// LOT /3 LOT /
e
e
PRp. E► �� CX. �SHNLft YYR
t3. EP X. t2 ,-Y4TEfILINE '
W. B.L. WEST HUNDRED ROAD STATE ROUTE aY 10
P P
aaerE Imo, R/W
R OelOKR
PROP EP • !0
EX. E►
E.B.L. WEST HUNDRED ROAD STATE ROUTE 4010
REVISED PLAN
865158-I
M
n
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO08
dsac►eVY-29T-4r984-GPG
Febr"ftrY-+4T-+984-6P6
March 25, 1987 BS
Colson and Colson Construction Company
Midlothian Magisterial District
West line of Twinridge Lane
REQUEST: Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a convalescent/rest
home and bulk exceptions in a Residential (R-15) District. (Note:
The request to permit building setback exceptions along Twinridge
Lane has been withdrawn.)
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED
CONDITIONS ON PAGES 1, 2, 3, AND 4.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A. Although the Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan desig-
nates the property for office use, the proposed convalescent/rest
home represents a reasonable land use transition between the exist-
ing office development to the east and single family residential
development to the west.
B. Through the Conditional Use Planned Development process, the Commis-
sion and Board can further insure quality development and land use
compatibility.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
rnNnTTTnNS
(STAFF/CPC) 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Clifford Curry, Architect, dated November 5,
1986, and the Textual Statement submitted with the appli-
cation shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 2. Public water and sewer shall be used. Public water and
sewer shall be extended from Fairwood Drive to serve the
site. (U)
(STAFF/CPC) 3. The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation, showing existing drainage and the
impact this project will have on the site and the sur-
rounding area. The developer shall submit a construction
plan to Environmental Engineering providing for on- and
off -site drainage facilities. This plan shall be approved
by the Environmental Engineering Department and all neces-
sary easements shall be obtained prior to any vegetative
disturbance. The approved off -site plan may have to be
implemented prior to clearing. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 4. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed, and around
the perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. Drain-
age shall be designed so as not to interfere with pedes-
trian access. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, thirty (30)
feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of
Twinridge Lane, shall be dedicated to and for the County
of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. (T)
(STAFF/CPC) 6. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, an addition-
al lane of pavement shall be constructed to VDOT standards
along the entire property frontage. Also, prior to the
issuance of an occupancy permit, curb and gutter shall be
installed along Twinridge Lane from the existing terminus
of curb and gutter south of the site northward across the
entire length of the property frontage. (T&EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 7. Within the required fifteen (15) foot parking setback
along Twinridge Lane, trees and shrubs of sufficient
height and density shall be planted to minimize the
visibility of parking areas from Twinridge Lane. Any
loading areas shall be screened from view of Twinridge
Lane and adjacent properties. Prior to rough clearing and
grading, a conceptual landscaping plan depicting these
requirements shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval. A detailed landscaping plan shall be sub-
mitted to the Planning Department for approval within
thirty (30) days of rough clearing and grading. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 8. A seventy-five (75) foot buffer shall be maintained along
the western property line. In addition, all parking shall
be located a minimum of 100 feet from the western property
line. With the exception of utilities which run generally
perpendicular through the buffer, pedestrian walkways, and
passive recreational uses, there shall be no other facil-
ities or other improvements permitted within this buffer
area. Existing vegetation within the buffer shall be
2 �7S008/BSJAN7/MAR25I
supplemented with landscaping to minimize the view of
driveways and parking areas. Prior to rough clearing and
grading, a conceptual landscaping plan depicting these
requirements shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval. A detailed landscaping plan shall be sub-
mitted to the Planning Department for approval within
thirty (30) days of rough clearing and grading. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 9. The parking area(s) shall have at least twenty (20) square
feet of interior landscaping for each space. Each re-
quired landscaped area shall contain a minimum of 100
square feet and have a minimum dimension of at least ten
feet. The primary landscaping material used in parking
areas shall be trees which provide shade or are capable of
providing shade at maturity. Each required landscaped
area shall include at least one small tree, as outlined in
this Condition. The total number of trees shall not be.
less than one for each 200 square feet, or fraction there-
of, of required interior landscaped area. The remaining
area shall be landscaped with shrubs and other vegetative
material to compliment the tree landscaping. Landscaping
areas shall be reasonably dispersed throughout, located so
as to divide and break up the expanse of paving. The area
designated as required setbacks shall not be calculated as
required landscaped area. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 10. All utility lines such as electric, telephone, CATV, or
other similar lines shall be installed underground. All
junction and access boxes shall be screened with appropri-
ate landscaping. All utility pad fixtures and meters
shall be shown on the site plan. The necessity for utili-
ty -connections, meter boxes, etc., shall be recognized and
integrated with the architectural elements of the site
plan. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 11. All buildings shall utilize materials similar to those
described in the Textual Statement. Architectural treat -
went of building facades (whether front, side, or rear)
shall not consist of architectural materials of inferior
quality, appearance, or detail to any other facade of the
same building. The intent of this requirement is not to
preclude the use of different materials on different
building facades (which would be acceptable if representa-
tive of good architectural design) but rather, to preclude
the use of inferior materials on sides which face adjoin-
ing property and thus, might adversely impact existing or
future development causing a substantial depreciation of
property values. No portion of a building constructed of
unadorned cinder block or corrugated and/or sheet metal
shall be visible from any adjoining property or Twinridge
Lane. Mechanical equipment, whether ground -level or
rooftop, shall be shielded and screened from public view
and designed to be perceived as an integral part of the
3 87S008/BSJAN7/MAR25I
building. Elevations depicting these requirements shall
be submitted to the Planning Department for approval in
conjunction with site plan review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 12. Exterior lighting shall not exceed a height of fifteen
(15) feet and shall be arranged and installed so that the
direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5 foot
candles above background measured at the lot line adjoin-
ing Twinridge Lane and the adjacent properties. Lighting
standards shall be of a directional type capable of
shielding the light source from direct view. A lighting
plan depicting these requirements shall be submitted to
the Planning Department in conjunction with site plan
review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 13. One (1) freestanding sign shall be permitted along
Twinridge Lane to identify the use. The freestanding sign
and all other signs shall be as regulated by the Zoning
Ordinance for Office Business (0) Districts. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 14. Parking shall be based upon a ratio of one (1) space for
each two (2) units. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 15. In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
Planning Commission shall grant schematic approval of the
Master Plan, subject to the conditions stated herein. (P)
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1. The landscaping plan required for the buffer along the
western property line shall be submitted to the owners of
Lots 6-A, 7-A, and 2-B of Bon Air Hills Subdivision by the
developer for their approval prior to rough clearing and
grading. Said plan is to include trees at least three (3)
inches in diameter and proportioned eighty (80) percent
evergreen and twenty (20) percent hardwood.
(STAFF/CPC) 2. The developer shall make the necessary application to
vacate Ontario Drive prior to the issuance of an occupancy
permit, and furthermore, agrees to the vacation of Ontario
Drive.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: West line of Twinridge Lane, approximately
280 feet north of North Providence Road.
Tax Map 18-15 (1) Parcels 4, 5, and 32
(Sheet 8).
Existing Zoning: R-15
Size: 3.8 acres
4 7S008/BSJAN7/MAR25I
ti
Existing Land Use: Single family residential
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - R-TH; vacant
South - R-15; Single family residential
and vacant
East - 0 with Conditional Use Planned
Development; Office
West - R-15; Single family residential
Utilities: Although there is an 8 inch water line
located along Twinridge Lane, the line does
not have sufficient flows for fire pro-
tection. Public water should be extended
from Fairwood Drive to serve this site.
(Condition 2)
Lies in Powhite Creek sewage drainage area.
Trunk sewer lines located along Twinridge
Lane and Fairwood Drive. Due to capacity
limitations in the Twinridge Lane sewer --
line, public sewer should be extended from
Fairwood Drive to serve this site. (Condi-
tion 2)
Environmental Engineering: Terrain flat to gently sloping and drains
west toward Bon Air Hills Subdivision.
Visual inspection reveals no discernible
adequate drainage outfall on -site. Ade-
quate drainage conveyance is first obtain-
able west of Fairwood Drive. Additional
drainage conveyance might be accomplished
by utilizing the existing right of way stub
for Ontario Drive and an existing ravine to
the north of the request site. May be
necessary to obtain off -site easements and
construct off -site improvements. (Condi-
tion 3)
Concrete curb and gutter should be in-
stalled around the perimeter of all drive-
ways and parking areas. (Condition 4)
Concrete curb and gutter should be extended
along Twinridge Lane from the terminus of
curb and gutter to the south, north across
the entire property frontage, to facilitate
drainage. (Condition 6)
Fire Service: Bon Air Fire Station, Company #4. At
present, fire service capability adequate.
County water flows and fire hydrants shall
be provided in compliance with nationally
recognized standards.
5 875008/BSJAN7/MAR25I
General Plan
(Northern Area Land
Use and Transporta-
tion Plan): Office
Transportation: This proposed development could generate
approximately 387 average daily trips.
These trips will be distributed along
Twinridge Lane which has not yet been taken
into the State system (except for approxi-
mately .03 miles (150 feet) from the inter-
section of North Providence Road). Traffic
counts are not available for this roadway
at this time. Currently this roadway is a
dead end street. Right of way should be
dedicated in accordance with the require-
ments of the Zoning Ordinance (Condition
5). Additional pavement, curb and gutter
should be constructed along the entire
property frontage in accordance with VDOT
standards. (Condition 6)
nT9rT1SgTnN
A Conditional Use Planned Development is requested to permit a convales-
cent/rest home in a Residential (R-15) District.
Although the Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan designates
the property for office use, the proposed convalescent/rest home repre-
sents a reasonable transitional use between the existing office develop-
ment to the east and the single family residential development to the
west. Through the Conditional Use Planned Development process, the
Commission and Board can minimize the impact on the existing adjacent
residential land uses and ensure quality development. Conditions 7, 8,
and 9 are designed to minimize the view of parking areas and parked
vehicles from Twinridge Lane and adjacent residences. Conditions 10, 11,
12, and 13 are designed to ensure quality development and further mini-
mize the impact on adjacent residences from the appearance of a typical
commercial use at the request site.
The applicant has withdrawn a request for a ten (10) foot exception to
the required forty (40) foot building setback along Twinridge Lane.
Staff has determined that this requested exception would not be necessary
given the building setbacks depicted on the Master Plan. It should be
noted, however, that the driveway depicted on the Master Plan along the
east side of the proposed garden suites will have to be relocated to
accommodate the required fifteen (15) foot parking and driveway setback
from the ultimate right of way for Twinridge Lane.
CASE HISTORY
6 87S008/BSJAN7/MAR25I
Planning Commission Meeting (1/20/87):
At the request of the applicants, the Commission deferred this case for
thirty (30) days.
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. Cowan, seconded by Mr. Rowe, the Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to the conditions and acceptance of the
proffered conditions on pages 1, 2, 3, and 4.
AYES: Unanimous
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
7 87SO08/BSJAN7/MAR251
11
l
4
1�
o�
fn
R-7
1-1010
\1640
R—Ty
v _= -15 = R M \
O our' Er.
J t : : fL
.s TWIN RIDGE Q z
,�0_ FICE CONDOS : [7 —
BON AIR HILLS" B'3
A
66
� a 1111111111111111111 11111 H 111'• •. � � ♦1 •�, - � •''•a•• t '
i •�•••••• `KEata•+•••`'•• �. 60 WEST —�
_ �.►••••• �••• zc
'Tug NP \ SHOPPING CENTER---- -
t� ,•,'a•aaa I v " �1 W
• = �aaa•"' I U
♦ 1 ��q,aa� � d r �RO•IN UWN
.� PENN ACRES
RTH
87SOC B �!
+111111++1111 •.
�
GUR D.
SH. 8 -
A
m
19
SITE PLAN
I
8'75 008- /
Z
W
LL
O
`WJ
CU
W
a-
U)
cr
W
a-
875oo8-Z
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO09
Frank L. Hereford
Midlothian Magisterial District
West line of Branchway Road and east line of Courthouse Road
REQUEST:
I. Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (0) and Community,
Business (B-2) with Conditional Use Planned Development on a 2.5
acre tract;
II. Amendment to a previously granted Conditional Use Planned Develop-
ment (Case 83S188) on an adjacent 2.7 acre tract; and
A commercial/office complex is planned.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGES 2 THROUGH 9.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
I. Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (0) and Community
Business (B-2) with Conditional Use Planned Development
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A. Although the Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan
designates the property for office use, the bulk of the proper-
ty surrounding this portion of the request site is zoned Commu-
nity Business (B-2), General Business (B-3), and Light Indus-
trial (M-1). The requested Community Business (B-2) zoning is,
therefore, representative of area development trends. The
proposed Office Business (0) tract conforms to the Northern
Area Plan and is representative of development trends along
Branchway Road.
B. Approval of this request would allow the subject property to be
incorporated into the development of those adjacent properties
which are already zoned commercial and office.
C. Through the Conditional Use Planned Development process, the
Commission and Board can ensure quality development and land
use compatibility.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
('nMnTTTnmq
(STAFF/CPC) 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Richard Shank Associates, P.C., dated January 5,
1987, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 2. Uses permitted in the Community Business (B-2) tract shall
be as follows:
a. All 0, B-1, and B-2 uses
b. Wholesale trade with retail sales as an accessory use
C. Cocktail lounges and dining halls
d. Office warehouses
e. Indoor recreational establishments
f. Veterinary hospitals, excluding outside runs. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 3. Uses permitted in the Office Business (0) tract shall be
as follows:
a. All 0, B-1, and B-2 uses
b. Wholesale trade with retail sales as an accessory use
C. Office warehouses. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 4. Parking shall be calculated based on 4.4 spaces for- each
1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The request par-
cels may be considered one (1) zoning lot for the purpose
of calculating parking and setback requirements if the
tract is subdivided and sold to different entities. If
the request property is subdivided and driveways and
parking areas are to be used in common by the tenants
located on the property, cross easement agreements shall
be submitted to the Planning Department for approval.
Upon approval, the cross easement agreements shall be
recorded. (P)
(Note: Should any parcel be subdivided or sold without an
approved cross easement agreement, parking and setback
requirements will be calculated individually and separate
from the original request parcels.)
(STAFF/CPC) 5. Signs shall be as regulated by the conditions for the
adjacent Office Business (0) and Community Business (B-2)
property (Case 835188). Signs shall be regulated as
though the subject site is part of the adjacent commer-
cial/office complex. Specifically, the following require-
ments shall apply:
2 7S009/BSJAN7/MAR25J
09
a. One (1) freestanding sign, visible from Courthouse
Road, not to exceed 100 square feet in area, shall be
permitted identifying this development and the ten-
ants therein.
b. One (1) freestanding sign, visible from Branchway
Road, not to exceed fifty (50) square feet in area,
shall be permitted identifying this development and
the tenants therein.
C. Individual buildings shall be permitted one (1)
freestanding sign each, not to exceed five (5) feet
in height and an area not to exceed ten (10) square
feet. These signs shall be positioned and located so
that they are not visible from Courthouse or Branch -
way Roads. These signs shall be similar to each
other in size, shape, and material.
d. Building -mounted signs shall be permitted provided
they do not project above the roof line and the
aggregate area of the building sign, plus the indi-
vidual building freestanding sign does not exceed 0.5
square feet for each one (1) foot of building
frontage.
e. A site directory sign may be permitted provided it
does not exceed a height of eight (8) feet, an aggre-
gate area of thirty (30) square feet, is not visible
from Courthouse and Branchway Roads and does not
create a traffic obstruction.
f. Signs may be illuminated, but may be luminous only if
the signfield is opaque with translucent letters.
g. Directional signs (entrance/exit, etc.) shall be
governed by Zoning Ordinance requirements.
h. Prior to erection of any signs, a comprehensive sign
package to include colors, materials, and typical
designs shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 6. Public water and sewer shall be used. Public water shall
be extended to connect with the existing public water line
in Busy Street. Prior to site plan submittal, a schematic
sewer plan, showing general locations and depths of sewer
lines, shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Util-
ities Department. (U)
(STAFF/CPC) 7. The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation showing existing drainage and the
impact this project will have on the site and the sur-
rounding area. The developer shall submit a site
3 875009/BSJAN7/MAR25J
construction plan to Engineering and VDOT providing for
on -site and off -site drainage facilities. This plan shall
be approved by the Engineering Department and VDOT, and
all necessary easements shall be obtained prior to any
vegetative disturbance. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC)
8. Minimum finished floor elevation on all buildings shall be
a minimum of one (1) foot above the flow of water over
Courthouse Road during the 100 year storm. Site grading
shall be such that no building is within five (5) feet of
the inundation limits of the 100 year backwater of Court-
house Road. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC)
9. The development and drainage design of the project shall
not cause the previously approved hydraulic grade line of
the drainage system for Chesterfield Commerce Center to be
elevated. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC)
10. A paved lining shall be constructed along those portions
of the existing temporary earth channel which is located
on-site'or within the existing recorded County drainage
easements. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC)
11. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed along the
perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC)
12. Prior to the release of a building permit for any site
with access to Courthouse Road, a minimum of sixty (60)
feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of
Courthouse Road, shall be dedicated to and for the County
of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. (T)
(STAFF/CPC)
13. Prior to the release of a building permit for any site
with access to Branchway Road, thirty (30) feet of right
of way, measured from the centerline of Branchway Road,
shall be dedicated to and for the County of Chesterfield,
free and unrestricted. (T)
(STAFF/CPC)
14. An additional lane of pavement, curb, and gutter shall be
constructed to VDOT standards along the entire property
frontage of Courthouse Road prior to issuance of any
occupancy permits for any use with access to Courthouse
Road. (T)
(STAFF/CPC)
15. An additional lane of pavement, curb, and gutter shall be
constructed to VDOT standards along the entire property
frontage of Branchway Road prior to the issuance of any
occupancy permits for any use with access to Branchway
Road. (T)
(STAFF/CPC)
16. Access shall be as regulated by the conditions for the
adjacent Office Business (0) and Community Business (B-2)
property (Case 83S188). Specifically, access shall be
4 -7SO09/BSJAN7/MAR25J
29
M
regulated as though the subject site is part of the adja-
cent Office Business (0) and Community Business (B-2)
property (Case 83S188). Specifically, the following
requirement shall apply: one (1) access shall be permit-
ted to Courthouse Road and one (1) access shall be pdr-
mitted to Branchway Road. The exact location of the
access to Branchway Road shall be approved by the Trans-
portation Department in conjunction with final site plan
review for any site accessing Branchway Road. (T)
(STAFF/CPC) 17. All utility lines such as electric, telephone, CATV, or
other similar lines shall be installed underground. All
junction and access boxes shall be screened with appropri-
ate landscaping. All utility pad fixtures and meters
shall be shown on the site plan. The necessity for utili-
ty connections, meter boxes, etc., shall be recognized and
integrated with the architectural elements of the site.
plan. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 18. Structures shall be similar to those depicted in the
elevations submitted with the application. Architectural
treatment of building facades (whether front, side, or
rear) shall not consist of architectural materials of
inferior quality, appearance, or detail to any other
facade of the same building. The intent of this require-
ment is not to preclude the use of different materials on
different building facades (which would be acceptable if
representative of good architectural design) but rather,
to preclude the use of inferior materials on sides which
face adjoining property and thus, might adversely impact
existing or future development causing a substantial
depreciation of property values. No portion of a building
constructed of unadorned cinder block or corrugated and/or
sheet metal shall be visible from any adjoining property
or public roads. Mechanical equipment, whether ground -
level or rooftop, shall be shielded and screened from
public view and designed to be perceived as an integral
part of the building. Elevations depicting these require-
ments shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
approval in conjunction with final site plan review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 19. Exterior lighting shall be arranged and installed so that
the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5
foot candles above background measured at the lot line
adjoining any public roads and adjacent properties.
Lighting shall be of a directional type capable of shield-
ing the light source from direct view. A lighting plan
depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the
Planning Department in conjunction with final site plan
review. (P)
5 87S009/BSJAN7/MAR25J
II. Amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 83S188 Amended)
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A. The proposed amendments will allow the existing zoned property
to be developed in conjunction with the adjacent property for
which rezoning and Conditional Use Planned Development is
requested (Request I).
B. The proposed amendments will allow development of a coordinat-
ed, orderly project.
!'f1VnTTTnMC
(STAFF/CPC) 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Richard Shank Associates, P.C., dated January 5,
1987, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 1 of Case
83S188.)
(STAFF/CPC) 2. In conjunction with the approval of this request, Condi-
tion 4 (a) of Conditional Use Planned Development 83S188
shall be eliminated. (P)
(Note: This condition 4 (a), which granted exceptions to
side yard setbacks, is no longer necessary with the inclu-
sion of the property addressed by Request I.)
(STAFF/CPC) 3. Parking shall be calculated based on 4.4 spaces for each
1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The request par-
cels may be considered one (1) zoning lot for the purpose
of calculating parking and setback requirements if the
tract is subdivided and sold to different entities. If
the request property is subdivided and driveways and
parking areas are to be used in common by the tenants
located on the property, cross easement agreements shall
be submitted to the Planning Department for approval.
Upon approval, the cross easement agreements shall be
recorded. (P)
(Note: Should any parcel be subdivided or sold without an
approved cross easement agreement, parking and setback
requirements will be calculated individually and separate
from the original request parcels.)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 5 of Case
83S188.)
(STAFF/CPC) 4. The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation showing existing drainage and the
impact this project will have on the site and the sur-
6 '7S009/BSJAN7/MAR25J
rounding area. The developer shall submit a site con-
struction plan to Engineering and VDOT providing for
on -site and off -site drainage facilities. This plan shall
be approved by the Engineering Department and VDOT, and
all necessary easements shall be obtained prior to any
vegetative disturbance. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 5. Minimum finished floor elevation on all buildings shall be
a minimum of one (1) foot above the flow of water over
Courthouse Road during the 100 year storm. Site grading
shall be such that no building is within five (5) feet of
the inundation limits of the 100 year backwater of Court-
house Road. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 6. The development and drainage design of the project shall
not cause the previously approved hydraulic grade line on
the drainage system of Chesterfield Commerce Center to be.
elevated. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 7. The applicant shall construct a paved lining on those
portions of the existing temporary earth channel which are
located on -site or within the existing recorded County
drainage easements. (EE)
(Note: Conditions 4, 5, 6, and 7 supersede Condition 7 of
Case 83S188.)
(STAFF/CPC) 8. Prior to the release of a building permit for any site
with access to Courthouse Road, a minimum of sixty (60)
feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of
Courthouse Road, shall be dedicated to and for the County
of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. (T)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 9 of Case
83S188.)
(STAFF/CPC) 9. An additional lane of pavement, curb, and gutter shall be
constructed to VDOT standards along the entire property
frontage of Courthouse Road prior to the issuance of any
occupancy permits for uses with access to Courthouse Road.
(T)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 11 of Case
83S188.)
(STAFF/CPC) 10. Access shall be as regulated by the conditions for Condi-
tional Use Planned Development (Case 83S188). Further,
access shall be regulated as though the subject site is
part of the development on Parcels 9 and 10 on Tax Map
17-9 (2) Avon Estates. Specifically, the following re-
quirement shall apply: one (1) access shall be permitted
to Courthouse Road and one (1) access shall be permitted
to Branchway Road. The exact location of the access to
7 87SO09/BSJAN7/MAR25J
Branchway Road shall be approved by the Transportation
Department in conjunction with final site plan review for
any site accessing Branchway Road. (T)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 13 of Condi-
tional Use Planned Development 83S188.)
(STAFF/CPC) 11. Access shall be provided from the subject parcel to the
adjacent Community Business (B-2) or Agricultural (A)
parcels to the south, as determined at the time of site
plan approval. Prior to the release of any building
permits, an access easement agreement shall be recorded,
subject to reasonable requirements and limitations (in-
cluding, but not necessarily limited to, the sharing of
maintenance expenses) on the use of such access easement.
(P&CPC)
(STAFF/CPC) 12. All utility lines such as electric, telephone, CATV, or
other similar lines shall be installed underground. All
junction and access boxes shall be screened with appropri-
ate landscaping. All utility pad fixtures and meters
shall be shown on the site plan. The necessity for utili-
ty connections, meter boxes, etc., shall be recognized and
integrated with the architectural elements of the site
plan. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 13. Structures shall be similar to those depicted in the
elevations submitted with the application. Architectural
treatment of building facades (whether front, side, or
rear) shall not consist of architectural materials of
inferior quality, appearance, or detail to any other
facade of the same building. The intent of this require-
ment is not to preclude the use of different materials on
different building facades (which would be acceptable if
representative of good architectural design) but rather,
to preclude the use of inferior materials on sides which
face adjoining property and thus, might adversely impact
existing or future development causing a substantial
depreciation of property values. No portion of a building
constructed of unadorned cinder block or corrugated and/or
sheet metal shall be visible from any adjoining property
or Huguenot Road. Mechanical equipment, whether
ground -level or rooftop, shall be shielded and screened
from public view and designed to be perceived as an inte-
gral part of the building. Elevations depicting these
requirements shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval in conjunction with final site plan review.
(P)
(STAFF/CPC) 14. Exterior lighting shall be arranged and installed so that
the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5
foot candles above background measured at the lot line
8 7S009/BSJAN7/MAR25J
M
M
adjoining any public roads and adjacent properties.
Lighting shall be of a directional type capable of shield-
ing the light source from direct view. A lighting plan
depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the
Planning Department in conjunction with final site plan
review. (P)
(Note: Conditions 2, 3, 4b, 4c, 6, 8, 10, and 12 of
Conditional Use Planned Development 83S188 remain applica-
ble to development.)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: West line of Branchway Road and east line
of Courthouse Road. Tax Map 16-12 (1)
Parcel 29 and Tax Map 17-9 (2) Avon Es-
tates, Lots 9, 10, and 11 (Sheets 7 and 8)._
Existing Zoning: A, B-2, and 0 with Conditional Use Planned
Development
Size: 5.2 acres
Existing Land Use: Single family residential and vacant
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - B-2 and B-3; Commercial
South - A and B-2 with Conditional Use
Planned Development; Single
family residential and vacant
East - B-3 and M-1 with Conditional Use
Planned Development; Commercial and
vacant
West - B-2 and B-3 with Conditional Use
Planned Development; Commercial
Utilities: 16 inch water line located along Branchway
Road and 8 inch water line located along
Courthouse Road. Use of public water
recommended. In order to provide adequate
water flows, public water should be extend-
ed to connect with existing public water
line in Busy Street. (Condition 1.6)
Lies in Falling Creek sewage drainage area.
8 inch trunk sewer line located on -site.
Use of public sewer recommended. Due to
the depth of existing sewer, the design of
public sewer extension should be approved
by the Utilities Department prior to final
site design. (Condition 1.6)
Environmental Engineering: Terrain flat and poorly drained. Drains to
culverts under Courthouse Road via on -site
9 87S009/BSJAN7/MAR25J
Fire Service:
ditch. This ditch conveys substantial
runoff from existing upstream development.
May lie within limits of the 100 year
floodplain, as well as within the limits of
the 100 year backwater. May be necessary
to obtain off -site easements and construct
off -site drainage improvements (Conditions
1.7 and II.4). Drainage should be designed
so as not to impede runoff from upstream
development (Conditions 1.9 and II.6).
Site improvements must be designed in
accordance with acceptable standards for
construction within the floodplain. (Con-
ditions 1.8 and II.5)
The Master Plan depicts building pad sites
in locations that may be required for
extension of upstream drainage improvements
and where existing drainage easements are
located. Buildings are not permitted to
encroach into drainage easements. On- and
off -site improvements may be required
within these easements. (Conditions I.10
and 11.7)
Concrete curb and gutter should be in-
stalled around the perimeter of all drive-
ways and parking areas. (Condition I.11)
Midlothian Fire Station, Company #5. At
present, fire service capability adequate.
County water and fire hydrants must be
provided in compliance with nationally
recognized standards.
General Plan
(Northern Area Land
Use and Transporta-
tion Plan) : Office
Transportation: Estimate proposed development could gener-
ate approximately 4,000 average daily
trips. These vehicles will be distributed
along Courthouse and Branchway Roads.
Courthouse Road had a 1984 traffic count of
18,222 vehicles per day, while Branchway
Road had a count of 4,242 vehicles per day.
Midlothian Turnpike had a 1985 traffic
count of 35,250 vehicles per day.
The Northern Area Land Use and Transporta-
tion Plan recommends ultimate rights of way
10 '7SO09/BSJAN7/MAR25J
on Courthouse Road and Branchway Road to be
120' and 60' respectively. Right of way
dedication should be in accordance with
this plan. (Conditions 1.12, 1.13, and
11.8)
In order to facilitate turning movements,
additional pavement, curb, and gutter
should be installed along the entire prop-
erty frontages on Courthouse and Branchway
Roads. (Conditions 1.14, 1.15, and 11.9)
There should be only one (1) access point
to Courthouse Road and only one (1) access
point to Branchway Road. Internal traffic
flow should be designed so as to discourage
cut -through traffic between Branchway Road..
and Courthouse Road. The location of the
access point on Branchway Road should be
approved by the Transportation Department
at such time that this access is required
to accommodate development. (Conditions
1.16 and II.10)
DISCUSSION
On April 25, 1984, the Board of Supervisors, upon a favorable recommenda-
tion by the Planning Commission, approved rezoning plus Conditional Use
Planned Development (Case 835188) for the portion of the request site
which is currently zoned Office Business (0) and Community Business
(B-2). The adjacent Community Business (B-2) zoning to the south was
also granted at that time.
The current request is for rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office
Business (0) and Community Business (B-2) with Conditional Use Planned
Development for additional property plus amendment to Conditional Use
Planned Development (Case 835188), to permit a commercial/office complex
on the entire request site. The conditions of the previously granted
Conditional Use Planned Development are attached hereto.
Although the Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan designates
the property for office use, a portion of the request site and properties
to the north and south of the request site are currently zoned General
Business (B-3) and Community Business (B-2). The requested Community
Business (B-2) zoning would allow a reasonable expansion of existing and
anticipated commercial development and would allow these properties to
develop in an orderly fashion. The requested Office Business (0) zoning
conforms to the Northern Area Plan and is representative of development
trends along Branchway Road.
The conditions recommended herein are similar
other commercial and office developments along
Roads. These conditions are designed to ensure
to conditions imposed on
Courthouse and Branchway
land use compatibility,
11 875009/BSJAN7/MAR25J
quality development, and reasonable expansion of commercial and office
use. In particular, the recommended conditions are designed to encourage
orderly and harmonious development in accordance with the applicant's
Master Plan. This plan incorporates property zoned under Case 835188 and
property for which zoning is requested. (Conditions I.1 and II.1)
The applicant has requested that the entire property be considered one
(1) zoning lot for the purpose of calculating parking and building set—
backs (Conditions 1.4 and II.3). Conditions to address concerns relative
to land use compatibility and quality of development for the entire
property are recommended. (Conditions 1.17, 18, 19 and 11.13 and 14)
The requested use exceptions are the same as those granted by Conditional
Use Planned Development 835188. (Conditions 1.2 and 1.3)
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. Cowan, seconded by Mr. Rowe, the Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to the conditions on pages 2 through 9.
AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
12 "75009/BSJAN7/MAR25J
CASE 835188rr✓
•• ipek
1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan repared
by Tiffany H. Armstrong and H. Louis Salomonsky, dated
January 23, 1984, shall be considered the Master Plan... The
applicant's textual statement shall be superseded by the
following conditions.
2. Uses permitted in the Community Business (B-2) tract shall
be as follows:
a. All 0, B-1 and B-2 uses
b. Wholesale trade with retail sales as an accessory use
c. Cocktail lounges and dining halls
d. Office warehouses
e. Indoor recreational establishments
f. Veterinary hospitals, excluding outside runs
3. Uses permitted in the Office Business (0) tract shall be as
follows:
a. All B-1 and B-2 uses
b. Wholesale trade with retail sales as an accessory use
C. Office warehouses
4. The following bulk exceptions shall be granted:
a. A twenty (20) foot exception to the twenty (20) foot
side yard setback requirement along the northern
boundary of Lot 11 and the southern boundary of Lot 12,
Avon Estate. This exception shall be granted only for
the westernmost 300 feet of the property.
b. A twenty-five (25) foot exception to the fifty (50)
foot driveway, parking and building setback requirement
along Courthouse Road. Within the twenty-five (25)
foot setback, landscaping and berming shall be
installed. In conjunction with schematic plan
submission for any site abutting Courthouse Road, a
landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Commission for approval.
C. A twenty-five (25) foot exception to the thirty (30)
foot rear yard setback requirement along the eastern
boundary of Tax Map 16-12 (1) Parcel 29.
5. Parking shall be calculated based on 4.4 spaces for each
1,000 square feet of gross floor area.
6. SIGNS
a. One freestanding sign, visible from Courthouse Road,
not to exceed 100 square feet in area, shall be
permitted identifying this development and the tenants
therein.
b. One freestanding sign, visible from Branchway Road, not
to exceed 50 square feet in area, shall be permitted
identifying this development and the tenants therein.
c. Individual buildings shall be permitted one
freestanding sign each, not to exceed 5 feet in height
and an area not to exceed 10 square feet. These signs
shall be positioned and located so that they are not
visible from Courthouse or Branchway Roads. These
signs shall be similar to each other in size, shape,
and material. - -.
d. Building mounted signs shall be permitted provided they
do not project above the roof line and the aggregate
area of the building sign, plus the individual building
freestanding sign does not exceed 0.5 square feet for
each one foot of building frontage.
e. A site directory sign may be permitted provided it doe
not exceed a height of eight (8) feet, an aggregate
area of thirty (30) square feet, is not visible from
Courthouse and Branchway Roads and does not create a
traffic obstruction.
f. Signs may be illuminated, but may be luminous only if
the sign field is opaque with translucent letters.
g. Directional signs (entrance/exit, etc.) shall be
governed by Zoning Ordinance requirements.
h. Prior to erection of any signs, a comprehensive sign
package to include colors, materials and typical
designs shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval.
7. On -site stormwater detention shall be employed and designed,
based on a ten (10) year storage with a two (2) year release
rate. (EE)
8. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed along the
perimeter of all driveways and parking areas.
9. Prior to the release*of a building permit for any site with
access to Courthouse Road, a minimum of forty-five (45) feet
of right of way measured from the centerline of Courthouse
Road, shall be dedicated to and for the County of
Chesterfield, free and unrestricted.
10. Prior to the release of a building permit for any site with
access to Branchway Road, thirty (30) feet of right of way
measured from the centerline of Branchway Road, shall be
dedicated to and for the County of Chesterfield, free and
unrestricted.
11. Prior to any schematic plan approval, a plan for the
construction of turn lanes and curb and gutter along
Courthouse Road shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and the VDH&T for approval. This plan may
include phasing for the ultimate improvements necessary to
accommodate turning movements.
12. An additional lane of pavement and curb and gutter shall be
constructed, according to VDH&T specifications, along
Branchway Road in conjunction with construction of access to
Branchway, v^nA •
FM
13. other than the two (2) access points shown, there shall be
no other direct access to either Branchway or Courthouse
Roads.
(Note: Schematic plans must be approved by the Planning
Commission.)
R--7
A
v
�ACN GR. • •
Is###I 1/ it111till
• --
C,
♦ i IIIIII � ♦ � ,IIIIIpllll •� � J O
IIII Q ; ♦ Q
4b am
•
r ♦ i
II \ : \ ) V V
O
IIIIII C
III / I MALL CT. C
V I ,1
c i Z ttlttttl LttL
H y0 CHESTERFIELD MALL vB__2
a•
L,/
* I1�1i111
s --
` y IIIIIef1/1�„ 11 i111V1111111/11111t`1111.-.
MI -LOTH'" TURNPIKEID
It
IDLO
l�nnl M
6
z , • C • IIt111
Zc
. c� CROSSROADS • Z
;r`• '
s t SHOPPING CENTER
� C 9 •
:
c _� ` c
I•
IIlltttttt1111 • 11 - � S A
9
�It11t1 1 • � -
1 • Q 1
•
bu
`50 bV"EN
t
r ice/ —� \ ` �Q' • c c c
v o �
SUNNY DELL ACRES •�I•'.,OG� •� U INVQ c
h( p w •�O FF:a , SOUTHPORT
• SOUTH AK
-
i
87SO09 -
A REZ:rA TO B-2 WITH C.UPD7'
R _ Q ®A TO 0 WITH GUM
®AMEND CURD.
D.
�. _.1ASH . 7 a 8 _
m
m
L_J
CONCEPTUALY\L
r � /(� )
I L i , i
RD
for MI DLOT HI AN SQUARE
shopping center
87SO09 -1
m
m
I
I
�
4
N B, hebr 7�.+,..w •r•...J
b. p.sa w.ew..r+e
s.*•- �• arr•
zconceptual planting plan
8-7SOOS-2
m
®i conceptual west elevation - building C
8-15oo9 -3
R
FebP"ftrY-143-1984-GPG
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO15
Arthur Pemberton
Midlothian Magisterial District
South line of Midlothian Turnpike
REQUEST: Conditional Use Planned Development to permit use and bulk ex-
ceptions in a Community Business (B-2) District. Outdoor seasonal
sale of produce, lawn furniture, and Christmas trees is planned.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGES 1 AND 2.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A. Although the Powhite/Route 288 Development Area Land Use and Trans-
portation Plan designates the property for light commercial use, the
proposed outdoor seasonal sale of produce, lawn furniture, and
Christmas trees represents a temporary use until such time that the
request site can be developed for a permanent light commercial use,
consistent with the adopted Plan.
B. Through the Conditional Use Planned Development, the Commission and
Board can further insure quality development and land use
compatibility.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., revised November 21,
1986, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 2. Uses permitted shall be limited to outdoor sale of season-
al plants, produce, lawn furniture, and Christmas trees.
(P)
(STAFF/CPC) 3. All driveways and parking areas shall be gravelled with a
minimum of six (6) inches of #21 or #21A stone. Driveways
and parking areas shall be delineated by permanent means
(i.e., concrete bumper blocks, timbers, etc.). (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 4. This Conditional Use Planned Development shall be granted
to and for Arthur Pemberton and shall not be transferrable
nor run with the land. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 5. This Conditional Use Planned Development shall be granted
for a period not to exceed three (3) years from date of
approval. (P&T)
(STAFF/CPC) 6. In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
Commission shall grant schematic approval of the Master
Plan. (P)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location• South line of Midlothian Turnpike, approxi-
mately 160 feet west of Mount Pisgah Drive.
Tax Map 16-9 (1) Part of Parcel 29 (Sheet
7).
Existing Zoning: B-2
Size:
0.5 acres
Existing Land Use: Commercial
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - B-2; Commercial
South - R-7; Vacant
East - B-2 with Conditional Use Planned
Development; Office
West - B-2 with Conditional Use Planned
Development; Commercial
Utilities• 16 inch water line located along north line
of Midlothian Turnpike.
Lies in Falling Creek sewage drainage area.
Trunk sewer line located approximately
1,400 feet south of request site. Dry
sewer lines located on adjacent property to
the east. Use of public utilities is not
required for proposed use.
2-S015/BSJAN7/MAR25L
Environmental Engineering: Drains south to vacant property. No exist-
ing or anticipated on- or off -site drainage
or erosion problems.
Fire Service: Midlothian Fire Station, Company #5. -At
present, fire service capability adequate.
General Plan
(Powhite/Route 288
Development Area Land
Use and Transportation
Plan): Light Commercial
Transportation: Based on specialty retail store trip rates,
proposed development could generate approx-
imately 20 average daily trips. These
vehicles will be distributed along,
Midlothian Turnpike which had a 1985 traf-
fic count of 24,750 vehicles per day.
Access for this development should be
limited to a single entrance/exit onto
Midlothian Turnpike. Typically, Staff
recommends additional pavement, curb and
gutter along all commercially developed
property frontage. However, since the
proposed use if of a temporary nature,
Staff supports deletion of the requirement
for pavement, curb, and gutter at this time
and will reevaluate its necessity at the
time the property is developed for a perma-
nent, light commercial use. (Condition 5)
DISCUSSION
A Conditional Use Planned Development is requested to permit outdoor sale
of seasonal produce, lawn furniture, and Christmas trees in a Community
Business (B-2) District.
Although the Powhite/Route 288 Development Area Land Use and Transvorta-
tion Plan designates the property for light commercial use, the proposed
outdoor seasonal sale of produce, lawn furniture, and Christmas trees
represents a reasonable use of the request site until the property can be
developed for a permanent light commercial use. The proposed use is
seasonal and temporary in nature and will not require extensive permanent
site improvements. Through a Conditional Use Planned Development pro-
cess, the Commission and Board can ensure that uses are limited to sea-
sonal outdoor sales and that adequate access and on -site parking is
provided. (Conditions 1, 2, 3, and 4)
It should be noted that this site lies within the Route 60 Special Sign
District. All signs must comply with the Special Sign District require-
ments for Community Business (B-2) Districts.
3 87SO15/BSJAN7/MAR25L
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. Cowan, seconded by Mr. O'Connor, the Commission recom-
mended approval of this request, subject to the conditions of pages 1 and
2.
' AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
4 75015/BSJAN7/MAR25L
i,
c
• R-7
Q
f./ �, q�
I' I I —1 � ] ♦♦ • •
/1 R /J
r ..r'1/1j1 _ ! !� I O B_` : 1,080111811111 ..
.. Hlq Q O -
14
of 1.,1j1j.. N T�RNPI
• KE Z,
• - F" lose"r
• � I i
�' ; �1jaa ++• + I'-: �111/11M11L111111111111
rl,
GLENGatE 1 y
� T
1
Et
-87S015
,r' I p I
—J _.V.V.1. D.
- ---- T •
SH. 7
� ; 1
MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE
87 SOIS-1
March 25, 1987 BS
ADDENDUM
87SO17
R. Larry and Katie G. Turner
Matoaca Magisterial District
South line of Hull Street Road
Since the Planning Commission's public hearing, the Environmental Engineering
and Utilities Departments have met with the applicants' engineer to discuss
the recommended conditions regarding on -site detention and extension of public
sewer. The applicants' representative has met with the Utilities Department
to discuss Condition 2, outlined in the "Request Analysis and Recommendation,"
which requires extension of public sewer to serve the office located on the
northern portion of the property and the office/manager's quarters on the
southern portion of the property. As noted in the Utilities section of the
"Request Analysis and Recommendation," a sewer line is being constructed along
the southern boundary of the site. This sewer line could serve not only the
manager's quarters on the southern portion of the property, but also the
office building located on the northern portion of the property. While the
applicants have agreed to connect the manager's quarters to public sewer, they
feel that the length of a lateral from the sewer line along the southern
portion of the property to the office located on the northern portion of the
property would be costly. Further, the applicants' engineer has indicated
that there are some engineering problems that may hinder extension from the
line located along the southern boundary. While there is a sewer line which
is proposed to be extended from the east which could serve the office located
on the northern portion of the property, the applicants have indicated that
the timing of the extension of that line may not be such that the office
building could be connected to public sewer initially. The applicants have,
therefore, requested. that the office located on the northern portion of the
property be allowed to utilize a septic tank and drainfield system until such
time that public sewer is extended from the east. The Utilities Department,
however, is of the opinion that both the manager's quarters and the office
building should be connected to public sewer initially and that the two alter-
natives stated herein would be acceptable connection routes. Specifically,
the Utilities Department continues to recommend imposition of Condition 2, as
stated in the "Request Analysis and Recommendation." However, should the
Board wish to allow the owner/developer some flexibility relative to extension
of public sewer to serve the office located on the northern portion of the
property, Condition 2, as amended herein, would be acceptable.
2. Prior to release of a building permit for the office located on the
northern portion of the property, the owner/developer shall enter
into an agreement with the adjacent property owner to the east
(i.e., Parcel 6 on Tax Map 49-11) to extend public sewer to serve
that building. Until such time that public sewer is extended to
serve the office located on the northern portion of the property,
n
Peb*eery-14T-4984-GPG
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO17
R. Larry and Katie G. Turner
Matoaca Magisterial District
South line of Hull Street Road
REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (M-1) with Condi-
tional Use Planned Development to permit bulk (setback) exceptions.
A mini -warehouse complex is planned. (Note: The request to permit
parking setback exceptions along Route 360 has been withdrawn.)
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGES 2 THROUGH 4.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of the rezoning and Conditional Use Planned Development to
permit mini -warehouses, and an exception to the twenty-five (25) foot setback
requirement for buildings along the eastern property line, for the following
reasons:
A. Although the Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan desig-
nates the property for office use, the proposed mini -warehouse
complex would be compatible with the adjacent warehouse use to the
east. Further, the proposed development will provide a transition
between Tomahawk Commercial Park to the east and future office
development to the west.
B. Through the Conditional Use Planned Development process, the Commis-
sion and Board can ensure proper land use transition, quality devel-
opment and land use compatibility.
C. The requested exception to the side yard setback along the eastern
property line would not have an adverse impact upon the industrially
zoned warehouse complex to the east (i.e., Tomahawk Commercial
Park). The recommended exception (i.e., fifteen (15) feet to the
twenty-five (25) foot setback requirement) will not have an adverse
impact on future development to the west if landscaping is installed
as recommended herein.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan submit-
ted with the application shall be considered the Master
Plan. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 2. Public water shall be used. Public sewer shall be extend-
ed to serve the office, manager's quarters and any similar
uses. (U)
(STAFF/CPC) 3. The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation showing existing drainage and the
impact this project will have on the site and the sur-
rounding area. The developer shall submit a construction
site plan to the Engineering Department providing for
on -site and off -site drainage facilities. This plan shall
be approved by the Engineering Department that all neces-
sary easements shall be obtained prior to any vegetative
disturbance. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 4. Prior to the release of any building permits, ownership
and maintenance of the detention basin shall be estab-
lished as the responsibility of private entities. An
indemnification agreement shall be submitted to the Engi-
neering Department to save the County harmless of vectors,
maintenance, and replacement responsibilities, etc. Upon
completion of construction of the detention facility, it
shall be certified by a professional engineer. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 5. The maximum permissible release rate from the detention
basin shall be no greater than the existing undeveloped
two (2) year storm runoff rate from its existing con-
tributing watershed. This release rate shall be main-
tained up to a 100 year storm under watershed post devel-
opment conditions. This condition may be modified by the
Environmental Engineering Department at the time of sche-
matic plan review. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 6. No storm drainage from the site shall be conveyed onto the
adjacent property to the east (i.e., Parcel 6 on Tax Map
49-11). This condition may be modified by the Environ-
mental Engineering Department at the time of schematic
plan review. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 7. All driveways and parking areas .shall be paved with
bituminous concrete or concrete. Concrete curb and gutter
shall be installed around the perimeter of all driveways
and parking areas. Drainage shall be designed so as not
to interfere with pedestrian access. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 8. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, additional
pavement, curb and gutter shall be constructed along Route
360. (T)
2 7S017/BSJAN7/MAR25M
(STAFF/CPC) 9. Within the parking setback along Route 360, trees and
shrubs of sufficient height and density shall be planted
to minimize the visibility of parking areas from Route
360. All loading areas shall be screened from view of
Route 360 and the adjacent properties to the west and
south. A conceptual plan depicting this requirement shall
be submitted to the Planning Department in conjunction
with final site plan review. A detailed plan depicting
this requirement shall be submitted to the Planning De-
partment for approval within thirty (30) days of rough
clearing and grading. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 10. A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
southern property line. With the exception of utilities,
which run generally perpendicular through the buffer,
retention/detention facilities and a fence, located along
the northern edge of the buffer, there shall be no other.
facilities or improvements permitted within this buffer.
If retention/detention is located in the buffer, adequate
screening shall be provided on either, or both sides, of
the facility so as to screen the buildings, drives, and
parking areas from adjacent property to the south. Exist-
ing vegetation within the buffer shall be supplemented
with landscaping and/or a solid board fence so as to
minimize the view of driveways and parking areas. A
conceptual landscaping plan depicting this requirement
shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval
in conjunction with final site plan review. A detailed
landscaping plan depicting this requirement shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval within
thirty (30) days of rough clearing and grading. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 11. A ten (10) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
western property line. Except for utilities, which run
generally perpendicular through the buffer, a sewer later-
al, fences, and/or landscaping, there shall be no other
facilities or other improvements permitted within this
buffer. Landscaping shall be accomplished within this
buffer to break up the expanses of buildings and fences.
A detailed landscaping plan depicting this requirement
shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval
in conjunction with final site plan review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 12. All utility lines such as electric, telephone, CATV, or
other similar lines shall be installed underground. All
junction and access boxes shall be screened with appropri-
ate landscaping. All utility pad fixtures and meters
shall be shown on the site plan. The necessity for utili-
ty connections, meter boxes, etc., shall be recognized and
integrated with the architectural elements of the site
plan. (P)
3 87S017/BSJAN7/MAR25M
(STAFF/CPC) 13. The structures shall be similar to those depicted in the
renderings submitted with the application. No portion of
a building constructed of unadorned cinder block or corru-
gated and/or sheet metal shall be visible from any adjoin-
ing property or Route 360. Mechanical equipment, whether
ground -level or rooftop, shall be shielded and screened
from public view and designed to be perceived as an inte-
gral part of the building. Elevations depicting these
requirements shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for approval in conjunction with site plan review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 14. Exterior lighting shall be arranged and installed so that
the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5
foot candles above background measured at the lot line
adjoining Route 360 and the adjacent property to the south
and west. Lighting shall be of a directional type capable
of shielding the light source from direct view. A light-
ing plan depicting these requirements shall be submitted
to the Planning Department in conjunction with final site
plan review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 15. Signs shall be regulated by the Special Sign District
requirements for Light Industrial (M-1) Districts. Land-
scaping shall be provided around the base of any
freestanding sign. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 16. The uses permitted shall be limited to office and
mini -warehouses. Further, residential use for the manager
of the project shall also be permitted. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 17. In conjunction with the approval of this request, a
twenty-five (25) foot exception along the eastern property
line and a fifteen (15) foot exception along the western
property line to the twenty-five (25) foot side yard
setback requirement shall be granted. (P)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: South line of Hull Street Road, approxi-
mately 50 feet east of Speeks Drive. Tax
Map 49-10 (1) Parcel 9 (Sheet 14).
Existing Zoning: A
Size: 7.4 acres
Existing Land Use: Single family residential
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - M-1 with Conditional Use Planned
Development; Commercial and industrial
South - A; Vacant
East - M-1; Industrial
West' - A; Single family residential or
4-7SO17/BSJAN7/MAR25M
n
n
vacant
Utilities: 12 inch water line located on -site. Use of
public water recommended. (Condition 2)
Lies in Falling Creek sewage drainage area.
10 inch trunk sewer line is proposed to be
constructed by others along southern por-
tion of request site. This trunk line
could accommodate sewer service to the
proposed manager's quarters on the southern
portion of the request site. Also, a 10
inch trunk sewer line is proposed by others
along Route 360. This trunk line could
provide sewer service to the office site on
the northern portion of the subject parcel.
Owner/developer should coordinate with
adjacent property owners to extend public
sewer. Recommend use of public sewer.
(Condition 2)
Environmental Engineering: The request parcel is located in the
Horners Run watershed. Management of
development in this watershed, particularly
with respect to storm water, is extremely
critical. The existing culvert under
Courthouse Road, into which Horners Run
drains, is not capable of handling the
potential volumes of storm water runoff
from future area development. The proposed
development has the potential to result in
99% runoff. In addition to culvert capaci-
ty problems, the actual creek
cross -sections of Horners Run are not large
enough to convey the anticipated storm
water volumes and are already, in some
locations, experiencing accelerated ero-
sion. The traditional approach to solving
this problem is to replace Horners Run
Creek with a large paved ditch. As area
development continues, these improvements
may become necessary.
A precedent setting storm water management
approach for the development in this
watershed has recently been implemented as
a part of the development of Victorian
Square Shopping Center located at the
southeast corner of Courthouse Road and
Route 360. The approach may be the begin-
ning of a storm water management design
5 87SO17/BSJAN7/MAR25M
which could be instrumental in precluding
future drainage problems discussed herein.
Over 7 acres of high runoff drainage area
that would have drained through the request
site have been incorporated into a storm
sewer system on the Victorian Square proj-
ect and routed to a detention basin which
has been designed to store the post devel-
opment 100 year storm while releasing water
at only a 2 year pre -development rate. The
Environmental Engineering Department feels
that this criteria should be consistently
applied to all subsequent commercial devel-
opment in this watershed. (Condition 5)
The existing pond on this site drains
towards the adjacent property to the east
into a irregular poorly defined area.
There is no drainage easement in this
location. It may be necessary to acquire
easements and make improvements on the
adjacent property. The adjacent property
has its own drainage problems and there-
fore, the request site should be designed
to avoid the necessity of making improve-
ments on the adjacent property. (Condition
3)
A more prudent approach would be to grade
the site to slope uniformly from Route 360
to the rear at Horners Run, pick up the
off -site drainage on the western side of
the property, and drain it along with the
entire site down to a large detention
facility in the rear which would drain
directly into Horners Run. By the uti-
lization of fill and curb and gutter along
the entire eastern property line, no drain-
age would be conveyed in the direction of
the adjacent property to the east.
(Conditions 4 and 6)
Fire Service: Wagstaff Fire Station, Company #10. At
present, fire service capability adequate.
Adequate distance must be maintained be-
tween buildings to accommodate access for
fire fighting apparatus. County water
flows and fire hydrants must be provided in
accordance with nationally recognized
standards.
6 --?SO17/BSJAN7/MAR25M
n
n
General Plan
(Northern Area Land
use and Transporta-
tion Plan): Office
Transportation: Proposed development could generate approx-
imately 684 average daily trips. These
vehicles will be distributed along Hull
Street Road which had a 1985 traffic count
of 29,970 vehicles per day. Additional
pavement, curb and gutter should be con-
structed along Route 360 to facilitate
turning movements. (Condition 8)
Staff typically recommends controlling
access along major arterials. The parcel
to the east has been developed with direct
access to Route 360. This existing access
is not designed to allow shared use with
this parcel. Shared access with the adja-
cent parcel to the west is not recommended.
When the vacant parcel to the west devel-
ops, Staff will recommend that access align
with Speeks Drive at the existing cross-
over. Therefore, it is reasonable to grant
direct access for this parcel, as depicted
on the Master Plan.
DISCUSSION
Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (M-1) with Conditional
Use Planned Development is requested. A self storage warehouse complex
is planned.
Although the Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan designates
the property for office use, the proposed self storage complex would be
compatible with the industrially zoned warehouse complex to the east and
provide an acceptable transition between Tomahawk Commercial Park and
existing and anticipated development to the west.
Through the Conditional Use Planned Development process, the Commission
and Board can further ensure quality development and land use compatibil-
ity. The conditions recommended herein are similar to those imposed on
recently approved commercial and industrial developments along the Route
360 corridor. The conditions are designed to provide a transition be-
tween the proposed use and anticipated residential development to the
south and anticipated office/commercial development to the west.
A twenty-five (25) foot exception to the twenty-five (25) foot side yard
building setback requirement for Light Industrial (M-1) Districts is
requested. Approval of the requested exception would not adversely
impact the existing warehouse complex to the east. A minimal setback
7 875017/BSJAN7/MAR25M
should be maintained along the western property line so as to accommodate
landscaping to break up the building line and provide transition to the
area designated for office use in the future. (Conditions 11 and 17)
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. Rowe, the Commission recommend-
ed approval of this request, subject to the conditions on pages 2 through
4.
AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
8 'S017/BSJAN7/MAR25M
r R-9
z
FR
ems• . �:
•t•t�'" ,',t••�,•
10
V 3 � PEES ,it•tt - i . : ,� :`
Oq s ;tt• i i i
2 �,go, vjs
ASIA
v c �Q. 1tt c
0
�PS"
s ,r ,.•••'' ,, ,,•��111
B-2
S LANDI
Q
N
87S017
REZ: A TO M-1 -
a' / C. U. P D. -
H. 1
zc
.a41, 00
Vj fw
ry�MeFR/
NGM
eFR
� s
SELF SE
N FOR PROPOSED
mom= 95.000 a►.
wrs uvwm Awwar. ao00 u
ON
n T_4
n0
m�
uu
DZNr`\I
mmi ` 5
N N
8-750 17-1
m
9
W
m
Z
T
w
W
m
Z
8"7 5 O 17-2
V
Febveery-44=-198;-GPG
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO18
Breck Caine
Matoaca Magisterial District
East line of Baldwin Creek Road
REQUEST: Conditional Use Planned Development in an Agricultural (A) District
to permit use and bulk exceptions. A commercial greenhouse and
nursery operation is planned. It should be noted that, by right,
the Zoning Ordinance would permit the sale of goods produced on the
property including the construction of a greenhouse, hothouse, plant
nursery, stand or shelter in an Agricultural (A) District. The
applicant, however, desires to sell not only those goods produced on
the site, but also goods and plants which are produced elsewhere.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND DENIAL.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend denial for the following reasons:
A. The proposed land use does not conform to the Powhite/Route 288
Development Area Land Use and Transportation Plan which designates
the subject property for low density residential use.
B. The proposed land use is incompatible with area residential devel-
opment and represents an encroachment into an established single
family residential area.
However, should the Commission and Board see fit to approve the appli-
cant's request, Staff recommends a minimum of a sixty (60) day deferral
to allow the applicant to revise the Master Plan to accommodate proper
drainage, buffers, and other site design features which will minimize the
impact on the surrounding land uses.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: East line of Baldwin Creek Road, approxi-
mately 1,200 feet south of Hull Street
Road. Tax Map 73 (1) Part of Parcel 90
(Sheet 19).
Existing Zoning: A
Size:
14 acres
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - A; Single family residential
South - A; Single family residential
East - A; Vacant
West - A; Single family residential
or vacant
Utilities: Public water is not available to the site.
Installation of individual well is
intended.
Located in Appomattox River Basin. Public
sewer is not available to the site.
Installation of an individual septic tank
and drainfield system is intended. Instal-
lation of a well and septic tank must be
approved by the County Health Department.
Environmental Engineering: Terrain is gently sloping and when cleared
has a slight chance for erosion. Drainage
is poor and soils are unfavorable for
installation of septic tank and drainfield
systems.
An existing swale runs through the approxi-
mate center of the property to a stream
which flows into Baldwin Creek which even-
tually enters Swift Creek Reservoir. The
subject property may be difficult to devel-
op as shown on the Master Plan. Specif-
ically because of the alignment of an
on -site stream and the off -site areas that
drain into the stream, the site probably
cannot be developed as depicted on the
Master Plan. The Master Plan should be
revised to reflect the alignment of the
stream and the proposed improvements locat-
ed according to the location of the stream.
It is suggested that a qualified profes-
sional engineer be employed to prepare the
Master Plan. It should be noted that the
County Zoning Ordinance will require that
final site plans be prepared by a qualified
engineer, surveyor, landscape architect,
etc.
Because the site drains into Swift Creek
Reservoir, a public water source, there is
concern that any nutrients and pesticides
2 'SO18/BSJAN7/MAR25N
stored on the request parcel may eventually
wash into the Swift Creek Reservoir.
In addition, the Master Plan indicates that
a pond is located on the five (5) acres
adjacent to the request site. A determina-
tion should be made as to whether the
stream passing through the proposed site
drains into the pond. Further, the size,
condition, and capability of the pond
should be studied. The pond should be
incorporated into a storm water management
plan. This would assist in minimizing the
possibility of contaminated water entering
Swift Creek.
Fire Service: Clover Hill Fire Station, Company V . At -
present, fire service capability is
adequate.
General Plan
(Powhite/Route 288
Development Area Land
Use and Transportation
Plan): Low density residential
Transportation: Based on trip rates for a specialty retail
store, the proposed development could
generate approximately 370 average daily
trips. These vehicles will be distributed
along Baldwin Creek Road which had a 1984
traffic count of 279 vehicles per day.
Additional pavement, curb and gutter should
be constructed along Baldwin Creek Road to
facilitate turning movements. The
Powhite/Route 288 Development Area Land Use
and Transportation Plan identifies Baldwin
Creek Road as a collector with a recommend-
ed right of way width of 70 feet. Right of
way dedication should be in accordance with
this Plan.
DISCUSSION
A Conditional Use Planned Development is requested with the intent of
operating a commercial greenhouse and nursery business. The applicant is
also requesting an exception to the Zoning Ordinance requirement relative
to the paving of parking areas and driveways. It is the intent to sell
plants not grown on the property, as well as sell related garden items.
The applicant has indicated that the plants will be sold from the request
site, as well as from the retail operation located on Branchway Road.
Initial construction would include the greenhouse marked "A," one (1)
pole shed, parking area, access roads, and the outdoor storage area. The
3 87SO18/BSJAN7/MAR25N
additional greenhouses would be constructed over a fifteen (15) year
period. The retail building would be constructed within five to ten
(5-10) years. The applicant has indicated that hours of operation would
be limited to daylight until such time that the retail building is com-
pleted at which time hours would be extended to 9:00 p.m., three (3) days
a week during the Christmas season.
The request property is currently zoned Agricultural (A) and is vacant.
The applicant has submitted a Master Plan which indicates that the re-
quest site will be developed to provide for retail sales, outdoor storage
and display of plants and materials, as well as greenhouses for the
propagation of plants. The remaining five (5) acres of the property,
which is not part of the current request, is intended for development as
a home site and is occupied by an existing pond.
The properties to the north, south, and west are currently zoned Agricul-
tural (A) and are occupied by single family residences or are vacant.
The Powhite/Route 288 Development Area Land Use and Transportation Plan
designates the request parcel and the bulk of the surrounding area for
low density residential development. The Plan does indicate that light
industrial development would be appropriate at the intersection of
Baldwin Creek Road and Route 360, north of the request site. Currently,
however, the area is characterized by residential development or remains
vacant. At present, the proposed land use is incompatible with area
residential development and represents an encroachment into an estab-
lished and developing residential area. Therefore, Staff is recommending
denial of the request.
It should be noted, however, that even if the current request is denied,
the Zoning Ordinance would still permit the sale of goods produced or
raised on the property, even if the current request is denied. The sale
of such goods could also include erection of greenhouses or other similar
facilities necessary for the propagation of plants or vegetables. Based
on this situation, there may be some merit in approving the current
request, thereby allowing imposition of conditions which might minimize
the impact on existing and future area residential development. Should
the Commission wish to consider approval of this request, a sixty (60)
day deferral would be appropriate to allow revision of the Master Plan to
address drainage and land use compatibility concerns.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. Rowe, the Commission recommend-
ed denial of this request.
AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
4 S018/BSJAN7/MAR25N
M
1
11
1
ol
mal
1..J l
i II
1
I
l
N
i
�87S018
C.U.PD.
SH. 19
I11r
it
-e 8
c� �I 1
a
o
a
W
W
Z W
O
~ N
Z W
JW J
R
C
J W W
d H Q
N
O
W
d Q
~ N
_
N~�
a3�
M
8750/8-/
INVITING FARMHOUSE HAS
MODERN DAY FLOOR PLAN
PLAN NO. D15G8578 and D15GB578A
(with garage) —Wrap -around porch in
a two-story farmhouse evokes old-
fashioned flavor... grand entrance foy-
er leads to dining room and large great
room with'fireplace... service corridor
provides convenient access to powder
room, utility room, and kitchen ... sec-
ond floor bathroom directly above
powder room and utility room provides
for economical plumbing... master
bedroom has ample dressing area, two
lavatories, and a large walk-in closet...
total living area is 1,006 sq.ft. on the
first floor and 896 sq.ft. on the second
floor.
�1 ('j�1
_1 6a,A 116niA
ffDICK — -- - V
rBED RM.
_I K CHEN ORKFSST it°zoo•M u ASTER BED RM.BED RM.
.�INGu'z 14°
OYER .u'•"• - '' n°z io•
PORCH
FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN
8 7 50 /8-2
T.A
"7M
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO19
Clover Hill Corporation
Matoaca Magisterial District
Lies at the western terminus of Singer Road
REQUEST: The applicant has requested rezoning, with proffered conditions,
from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15). A single family res-
idential subdivision is planned.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON PAGE 1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of the requested R-15 zoning and acceptance of the
proffered conditions for the following reasons:
A. The requested zoning and land uses are in conformance with the
proposed Western Area Land Use and Transportation Plan.
B. The requested zoning and land uses are compatible with and rep-
resentative of area development trends.
C. The proffered conditions will assure lot sizes and widths which are
compatible with lot sizes and widths in the area.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1. Lots will be a minimum of 40,000 square feet.
(STAFF/CPC) 2. Lots will have a minimum width of 150 feet at the building
line.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: Lies at the western terminus of Singer
Road. Tax Map 76 (1) Part of Parcel 13
(Sheets 20 and 29).
Existing Zoning: A
Size: 21.3 acres
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - R-15; Single family residential
or vacant
South - A; Vacant or single family
residential
East - R-15; Single family residential
West - A; Vacant or single family
residential
Utilities: 8 inch water line located approximately
4,500 feet northwest of this site in Deer
Run Subdivision. The applicant intends to
utilize individual wells. This area of the
County is experiencing problems with wells.
Therefore, the Utilities Department would
recommend that public water be extended to
this site. In order to service this site
with public water, off -site easements will
be necessary to extend water lines from
Deer Run Subdivision south to this site.
The developer will be required to acquire
these easements at his own expense. Appro-
priate conditions will be recommended at
the time of tentative subdivision review.
Environmental Engineering:
Located in the Upper Swift Creek sewage
drainage area. Public sewer is not avail-
able for use. The applicant intends to
utilize individual septic tanks.
Site is considered to be poor for the
intended use because of drainage problems
and erosion potential when cleared. Topog-
raphy ranges from gently sloping to moder-
ately steep. Slopes of 2% to 6% (gently
sloping) have slight chance of erosion when
cleared but have severe drainage problems.
Slopes of 6% to 12% (sloping) have slight
erosion problems and few drainage problems
while slopes of 12% or greater (moderately
steep) have severe limitations because of
the potential for erosion problems when
cleared. At the time of subdivision re-
view, Staff will recommend conditions
dealing with erosion control and/or clear-
ing on steep slopes.
2 87S019/BSJAN7/MAR250
Site is moderately sloping in most areas
and drains to Reedy Branch Creek which
flows through the property. There are no
existing on- or off -site drainage and/or
erosion problems; however, Staff would note
that Reedy Branch Creek is a large creek
with a large drainage area. The culvert
needed to convey the creek under an exten-
sion of Singer Road will be large and
expensive. Backwater easements will be
necessary upstream of this culvert
crossing.
Schools: The applicant has proffered a minimum lot
size of 40,000 square feet which will limit
the number of school age children to ap-
proximately 15. Lies in the Grange Hall
Elementary School attendance zone: capaci-
ty - 642, enrollment - 610; Swift Creek_
Middle School zone: capacity - 1,500,
enrollment - 1,234; Clover Hill High School
zone: capacity - 1,700, enrollment -
1,610. It is anticipated that current
growth patterns in this area will utilize
available capacity in two years.
Fire Service:
General Plan
(Western Area Land
Use and Transporta-
tion Plan - Proposed):
Clover Hill Fire Station, Company #7
(paid/volunteer). At present, fire service
capability is good.
Low density residential
(1.50 units/acre or less)
Transportation: This development could generate approxi-
mately 210 average daily trips. These
vehicles will be initially distributed
along Singer Road (Route 1292) which had a
1984 traffic count of 506 vehicles. At the
time of subdivision plan review, Staff will
make recommendations regarding stub roads
to adjacent parcels. When analyzing stub
roads, Staff will recommend that the road-
ways in this development be designed to
minimize the attractiveness for
"cut -through" traffic.
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential
(R-15). The applicant has proffered conditions relative to minimum lot
3 87SO19/BSJAN7/MAR250
sizes and widths that will assure this development's compatibility with
other area developments.
In reviewing this request, Staff considered the recommendation of the
proposed Western Area Land Use and Transportation Plan, as well as other
developments in the area.
The Western Area Plan recommends this area be developed in accordance
with low density residential standards (1.50 units/acre or less). The
applicant has proffered lot sizes that will be a minimum of 40,000 square
feet. Based on these minimums, the maximum density possible will be
approximately one (1) unit per acre which is for less density than the
Western Area Plan recommendation of 1.50 units/acre or less. Consequent-
ly, this request is in accordance with the recommendation of the Plan.
This proposed development is in the vicinity of Clover Hill Farms and
Sleepy Hollow to the east; Donegal Forest North, Donegal Forest, and
Donegal Glen to the northeast. Clover Hill Farms is zoned R-15 and has
an average lot size of approximately 1.5 acres. Lots in Clover Hill
Farms range from approximately 39,000 square feet to over 5 acres. Lot
widths average approximately 220 feet and range from 145 to 300 feet.
Sleepy Hollow is zoned R-15 and has proffered conditions which ensure a
minimum lot size of 37,000 square feet, with an average lot size of not
less than 1.10 acres. Also, proffered was a minimum lot width of 125
feet, measured at the building line.
Donegal Forest North is zoned R-25 and has an average lot size of approx-
imately 8.3 acres. Lots in Donegal Forest North range in size from
approximately 3.5 acres to 16.75 acres with lot widths averaging approxi-
mately 300 feet. Donegal Forest is zoned R-25 and has an average lot
size of approximately 1.75 acres. Lots in Donegal Forest range in size
from approximately 40,685 feet to 4.9 acres with lot widths averaging
approximately 150 feet. Donegal Glen is zoned R-25 and has an average
lot size of approximately 1.7 acres. Lots in Donegal Glen range in size
from approximately 25,530 square feet to 6.5 acres with lot widths av-
eraging approximately 175 feet. Many of the lots in all of the above
subdivisions are extremely large. This is due to the large area of poor
soils throughout this area of the County. It is felt that this site will
have some lots that are relatively large for the same reasons. Conse-
quently, it is expected that the average lot size will be somewhat larger
than what would typically occur. This, together with the proffered
conditions, will help to ensure that this development will be compatible
with other area developments.
It is felt that this request is both compatible to existing residential
development and that it is in compliance with the densities as recommend-
ed in the Western Area Plan. Therefore, it is recommended that the re-
quested zoning be approved and that the proffered conditions be accepted.
As a general note, Staff would like to point out that this parcel of
land, and a number of other parcels located along Bailey Bridge Road,
were recently parceled off of a much larger tract of land. This was
possible because all parcels along Bailey Bridge Road were at least
4 87S019/BSJAN7/MAR250
30,000 square feet in area and 150 feet wide. Many of these parcels have
been sold to individuals and several houses are under construction. This
practice makes it extremely difficult to adequately plan for road im-
provements and proper development of the area as a whole.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. Rowe, the Commission recommend-
ed approval of this request and acceptance of the proffered conditions on
page 1.
AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
5 87S019/BSJAN7/MAR250
a
•
A
� 1
� 1
I
\\ I I
\SPRING RUN RD. I I
DEERPARK DRJ�_
CLOVER HILL FARMS
I >> I
I I I.--
m
SINGER RD.
875019
REZ: A TOJR
SH. 20 &
m
M
SUITABILITY
87301q- I
n
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
875021
Feb*eefy--143--�984-GPG
March 25, 1987
Sommerville Development Corporation
Midlothian Magisterial District
North line of Midlothian Turnpike
REQUEST: Amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case 805092) to
permit use exceptions and modify buffer requirements in a Light
Industrial (M-1) District. An industrial park is planned.
The applicant has requested that this case be remanded to the Planning Commis-
sion for amendment to include setback exceptions.
The Planning Commission is scheduled to consider the amended request on April
21, 1987.
875021/BSJAN7/MAR25P
Islas
/r. R-2
z c ob
loses z ChEp`TM1.
40 11,3
off,
R-9
R-4-0 C"
A4-1
•
4/V
LLJ
-j
®''
u
R-/5
OTTERDALE
3:
A
�87SO21 - AMEND C.U.PD.
7
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO22
Woodrow Waller
Bermuda Magisterial District
West line of Jefferson Davis Highway
REQUEST: Rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3). A
tire store and auto repair business is planned.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION ON PAGE 1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A. The proposed zoning and land uses conform to the Central Area Land
Use and Transportation Plan.
B. The proposed zoning and land use are compatible with, and represen-
tative of, development trends along the Route 1 corridor.
C. The condition recommended herein will minimize the impact of the
commercial zoning and land use on the existing residential develop-
ment along Perrymont Road, west of the site.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
CONDITION
(STAFF/CPC) A fifteen (15) foot buffer shall be maintained along Perrymont
Road. Also, all outdoor storage areas shall be buffered so as
to screen their view from adjacent properties and public rights
of way. Other than landscaping and/or fencing, there shall be
no facilities permitted in the fifteen (15) foot buffer along
Perrymont Road. In conjunction with final site plan review, a
plan depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval. (P)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: West line of Jefferson Davis Highway, east
line of Perrymont Road, approximately 392
feet north of Willis Road. Tax Map 81-8
(1) Parcel 16 (Sheet 23).
Existing Zoning: B-2
Size: 0.6 acres
Existing Land Use: Commercial
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - B-3; Commercial
South - B-2; Office
East - B-3; Commercial
West - B-2; Single family residential
Utilities: 8 inch water line located on -site along
Perrymont Road. Use of public water
required by County Ordinance.
Lies in Kingsland Creek sewage drainage
area. 8 inch sewer line located approxi-
mately 300 feet south of site in Perrymont
Road. Utilities Department suggests that
public sewer be extended to serve the
proposed development.
Applicant intends to utilize existing
septic tank and drainfield system. Use of
new, or existing, private sewage system
must be approved by the County Health
Department.
Environmental Engineering: Property drains to the west toward
Perrymont Road. No existing or anticipated
drainage or erosion problems. Proposed
building and parking area should be de-
signed to drain toward Perrymont Road.
Installation of concrete curb and gutter
around the perimeter of all parking and
driveway areas will be required.
Fire Service: Bensley Fire Station, Company #3. At
present, fire service capability is ade-
quate. Dependent upon existing fire
hydrant location, may be necessary to
install a fire hydrant.
2 875022/BSJAN7/MAR25Q
Cm
n
General Plan
(Central Area Land
Use and Transporta-
tion Plan): General Commercial
Transportation: This proposed development could generate
approximately 750 average daily trips.
These vehicles will be distributed along
Jefferson Davis Highway which had a 1985
traffic count of 24,070 vehicles per day.
Additional pavement, curb and gutter should
be constructed along Route 1/301 to facili-
tate turning movements. The Master Plan
depicts two points of access for this
development to Jefferson Davis Highway. At
the time of site plan review, Staff will
recommend that access be limited to one.
entrance/exit located towards the southern
property line.
The Central Area Land Use and Transnorta-
tion Plan identifies Route 1/301 as a major
arterial with a recommended right of way
width of 120 to 200 feet. Right of way
must be dedicated in accordance with this
Plan, prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
DISCUSSION
Rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3) is
requested with the intent of operating a tire store and automotive repair
business. The site is currently occupied by a similar operation which is
not a permitted use in a B-2 District. It is the applicant's intent to
remove the existing structure and erect a new building and paved parking
area.
The area surrounding the request parcel is characterized by a mixture of
residential, commercial, and office uses. Property to the north and east
is currently zoned General Business (B-3) and occupied by commercial
uses. Property to the south is zoned Community Business (B-2) and oc-
cupied by an office while property to the west is zoned Community Busi-
ness (B-2) and occupied by residences.
The requested zoning and land uses conform with the Central Area Land Use
and Transportation Plan and are representative of development trends
along Jefferson Highway. However, particular consideration should be
given to the impact of intense commercial use on the adjacent residential
development to the west.
3 875022/BSJAN7/MAR25Q
The recommended buffers will minimize the impact on the adjacent resi-
dents and provide screening of outside storage areas from view of
Perrymont Road, Jefferson Davis Highway, and adjacent properties to the
north and south. Further, the buffer recommended along the western
boundary of the site will prevent vehicular access and turning movements
on Perrymont Road.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. Rowe, seconded by Mr. O'Connor, the Commission recom-
mended approval of this request, subject to the condition on page 1.
AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
4 875022/BSJAN7/MAR25Q
z is
: S
ilir�1rft7 � ,
M - 2 ILI R.;
AREA r..,....n
M
woo
ND • ,lrr.rr ` �0h .•• . •• .... t••'~� •
ROA(1
A �i w
•
; :
w
82
• g10
—r;
nP91. .
y : • 'Q� 4 ; ss5: :
\ : ....1.....1 NORCOfr i w
V • 1111111�; • $ J s :
: • H
Jay p • Z i ; tP
10
atios< �� % . ; �• �KINGSLAND HEIGHTS LL`B.3
Ir
L CRESCENT PARK '10
P o
V-�
'0
....
. B _2 ' _
1 \ \ : to
1
\ :
� � v, - 0
(
' \
K'NG5DF E i 4T 6,3
111 , ; I ; I 7; \e-z .087SO22Iloilo
�.
i `v�����,� v' ��;�• -REZ• 6-2 TO 6-3
10
\10�,..•
m
m
W �4
J14
J
Q
3v3�
3
O
i
oa
��
4
v
/07.40'
---
N/9'02'17'0
PA YSIO ff ~
SI SOZZ-/
Febr"dry-l:�s-1994-GPG
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO23
Brandon Development Corporation
Clover Hill Magisterial District
Lies off the east and west lines of Sunset Hills Drive
REQUEST:
I. Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) with proffered
conditions. A single family residential subdivision is planned.
II. Amendment to a previously granted Conditional Use Planned Develop-
ment (Case 845118) to permit the recordation of 63 lots and the
approval of 63 building permits with one access. At the time of
zoning approval for Brandon Subdivision, a condition was imposed
which is the same as Section 18-36(g) of the Subdivision Ordinance
which requires a second public road access prior to recordation of
more than fifty-nine (59) lots or issuance of more than fifty (50)
building permits.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON PAGE 2.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
I. Recommend approval of the requested Residential (R-9) zoning and accep-
tance of the proffered conditions for the following reasons:
A. The requested zoning and land use are compatible with, and
comparable to, area development and adjacent subdivisions.
B. The requested zoning and land use conform to the Powhite/Route
288 Development Area Land Use and Transportation Plan.
C. The proffered conditions will assure lot sizes and widths that
will create a proper transition of development toward Court-
house Road.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1. A minimum width of eighty (80) feet.
(STAFF/CPC) 2. An average lot width of eighty-five (85) feet.
(STAFF/CPC) 3. A minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet.
II. Recommend that the previously imposed condition of zoning be deleted
instead of being amended for the following reason:
A second access may be obtained in several ways: Corryville Road to
the east or Krossridge Road to the north which may ultimately con-
nect to West Providence Road. Under Section 18-36 (g) of the Subdi-
vision Ordinance, the Planning Commission may consider the alterna-
tives and, if they deem it appropriate, may grant a waiver to the
requirement of the Subdivision Ordinance.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: Lies approximately 150 feet off the east
and west lines of Sunset Hills Drive. Tax
Map 38-14 (1) Parcels 3, 4, and 27 (Sheet
14).
Existing Zoning: A and R-9 with Conditional Use Planned
Development
Size: 14.2 acres (39 acres under amendment of the
Conditional Use Planned Development)
Existing Land Use: Vacant and single family residential
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - A and R-9 with proffered
conditions; Vacant
South - A, R-7, and R-9; Single family
residential and vacant
East - A; Single family residential or
vacant
West - R-7 and R-9 with proffered
conditions; Single family residential
or vacant
Utilities: 12 inch water line located along Sunset
Hills Drive, approximately 300 feet west of
the rezoning request. The developer will
be required to acquire off -site easements
from Sunset Hills Drive to this site at his
own expense. Use of public water recom-
mended and intended.
2 87SO23/BSJAN7/MAR25R
Located in the Falling Creek sewage drain-
age area. 48 inch trunk sewer line located
on -site at the southern boundary of this
request. Use of public sewer is recommend-
ed and intended.
Environmental Engineering: This site is rated poor for the proposed
use because of severe drainage and erosion
potential. The topography ranges from
gently sloping to moderately steep with
slopes ranging from 2% to 12+%. Soils on
slopes of 2% to 6% (gently sloping) have
slight erosion problems when cleared and
are poorly drained. Slopes of 67 to 12%
(sloping) are well drained, and have few
limitations. Slopes greater than 12%
(moderately steep) have a low clay content
and are highly susceptible to erosion when
cleared. At the time of tentative subdivi-..
sion review, Staff will address drainage
for home sites for each lot and erosion
control of steeply sloping lots.
Site drains to Falling Creek. There are no
existing or anticipated drainage and/or
erosion problems. This site should develop
according to standard drainage and erosion
control procedures. No off -site drainage
easements will be necessary.
Schools: Estimate approximately 24 school age chil-
dren will be generated. However, the
applicant has applied for tentative subdi-
vision review. His plats propose 22 lots
which would generate 15 students. Lies in
the Providence Elementary School attendance
zone: capacity - 850, enrollment - 504;
Swift Creek Middle School zone: capacity -
1,500, enrollment - 1,234; Monacan High
School zone: capacity - 2,000, enrollment
- 1,865. At the current growth rate,
development will exhaust available capacity
at all levels within 2 to 5 years. Conse-
quently, any new zoning will require new
facilities.
Fire Service: Wagstaff Fire Station, Company #10
(paid/volunteer). At present, fire service
capability is good. County water and fire
hydrants must be provided in compliance
with nationally recognized standards.
3 87S023/BSJAN7/MAR25R
General Plan
(Powhite/Route 288
Development Area Land
Use and Transportation
Plan):
Medium density residential
(1.51-4.00 units/acre)
Transportation: This rezoning from A to R-9 could generate
350 trips. These trips will be initially
distributed along Sunset Hills Drive (Route
2331) which had a 1984 traffic count of 129
vehicles. Sunset Hills Drive is part of an
existing section of the subdivision of
Brandon whose sole access is currently
limited to Courthouse Road, which had a
1984 traffic count of 16,274 vehicles. At
the time of subdivision plan review, Staff
will make recommendations regarding stub
roads to adjacent parcels.
DTSCUSSTON
The applicant is requesting rezoning of 14 acres from Agricultural (A) to
Residential (R-9). The applicant proffered several conditions which
assures a minimum lot width of 80 feet, overall average lot width of 85
feet, and a minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet.
The applicant has also requested amendment to a previously granted Condi-
tional Use Planned Development (Case 845118) to permit an exception to a
previously imposed condition of zoning which requires a second public
road access upon recordation of 59 lots and approval of 50 building
permits. This is the same requirement that Section 18-36 (g) of the
Subdivision Ordinance places on all subdivisions. Staff has recommended
approval of the requested zoning and acceptance of the proffered con-
ditions; and has recommended denial of the requested exception.
In reviewing this request, Staff considered the recommendations of the
Powhite/Route 288 Development Area Land Use and Transportation Plan, as
well as other developments in the area. The Powhite/Route 288 Plan
recommends this area be developed at medium density residential standards
(1.50-4.00 units/acre). The site is relatively long and narrow and has a
great deal of floodplain area along Falling Creek. It is anticipated
that lots backing to Falling Creek will be extremely large. The appli-
cant has also applied for tentative subdivision approval and has shown 22
lots to be developed. He has also proffered conditions which will limit
the minimum lot size to 12,000 square feet and will assure a minimum lot
width of eighty (80) feet and average lot width of eighty-five (85) feet.
These proffers and other limiting factors should ensure compliance with
the Plan. If developed in accordance with the proposed tentative subdi-
vision plat, the density will be approximately 1.55 units per acre. This
is in conformance with the recommendation of the Plan.
4 875023/BSJAN7/MAR25R
This proposed development is bounded by existing Brandon Subdivision to
the west, and J.J.R. Properties further to. the west. Additionally, a
parcel of land to the northwest was recently rezoned and is yet undevel-
oped. This parcel is zoned Residential (R-9) with proffers of an average
lot size of 16,000 square feet with no more than 68 lots. This is an
overall density of 2.1 units/acre. Brandon, Section A is zoned Residen-
tial (R-9) with Conditional Use Planned Development and has an average
lot size of approximately 18,349 square feet. Lots in Brandon, Section A
range in size from approximately 11,200 to 117,600 square feet with lot
widths averaging approximately 85 feet. Lots in the unrecorded portion
of Brandon average approximately 19,888 square feet and range from 10,400
square feet to three (3) acres. Lot widths average approximately 80
feet.
J.J.R. Properties is zoned Residential (R-9) with proffered conditions
relative to maximum number of lots to be developed, and has an average
lot size of approximately 23,479 square feet. Lots range from approxi-
mately 9,000 square feet to 10 acres with lot widths averaging approxi-
mately 75 feet. These lots have not been developed as of yet.
Staff is of the opinion that the requested R-9 zoning with the proffered
conditions submitted by the applicant will provide a smooth transition of
development as it moves closer to Courthouse Road and is compatible with
the existing Brandon development. Because of this and the fact that the
request is in conformance with the Powhite/Route 288 Development Area
Land Use and Transportation Plan, it is recommended that the requested
zoning be approved and the proffered conditions accepted.
The applicant in this zoning request is also the developer of the exist-
ing Brandon development located adjacent to, and to the west of, the
above described rezoning request site. At the time of zoning of the
existing Brandon development, a condition was imposed which restricted
development to the recordation of 59 lots and/or the issuance of 50
building permits. The condition is as follows:
The second public road access required by the Subdivision Ordinance
shall be provided prior to the recordation of more than 59 lots or
the issuance of more than 50 building permits. (BS)
It should be noted that this condition is the same as Section 18-36 (g)
of the Subdivision Ordinance. During the discussions of the previous
zoning request, Staff noted concerns with potential traffic volumes on
Sunset Hills Drive which serves as the only access for both the existing
Brandon development, as well as development of other vacant property
along the road. As these properties develop, the potential exists for
250-300 lots to develop with Sunset Hills Drive as the only point of
ingress/egress to Courthouse Road. Staff feels that this is an unaccept-
able density with only one access. Consequently, Staff does not feel
that the requested exception should be granted. However, Staff feels it
is appropriate to delete the condition altogether, as the Subdivision
Ordinance currently deals with this issue. With the zoning condition
deleted, the Planning Commission can consider the request when the devel-
opers present their tentative plats and can require any necessary im-
provements to mitigate concerns about traffic volumes.
5 87S023/BSJAN7/MAR25R
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. O'Connor, seconded by Mr. Rowe, the Commission recom-
mended approval of this request and acceptance of the proffered con-
ditions on page 2.
AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
6 87SO23/BSJAN7/MAR25R
I
r \
N
0 N �Z PAID
v
r
r
•
r
• - v
� v _
r P,PE L iNE_
87SO23
.z EIREZ: A TO R-9
VN ESTATES i �•
i ®AMEND C.U.PD.ti♦
SH. 14
U1
G
n
1
i
F '
SOIL SUITABILITY
875023-1
March 25, 1987 BS
ADDENDUM
87SO24
Chesterfield Meadows Shopping
Center Associates, L.P.
Matoaca Magisterial District
East line of Iron Bridge Road
The applicant has proffered a condition regarding dedication of right of way
along Route 10 in lieu of Condition 14 as recommended by Staff. Staff
supports acceptance of the proffer. Condition 14 should, therefore, be
deleted.
Further, with respect to Condition 5(a), the applicant has requested that
setbacks along Route 10 be measured from the existing right of way of Route
10 instead of the right of way designated on the General Plan (i.e., 100 feet
from centerline). Pursuant to the developer's proffer, Staff supports
amendment to Condition 5(a).
PROFFERED CONDITION
Prior to the release of any building permit, the developer and County
shall enter into an agreement acceptable to the County whereby the
developer reserves 100 feet of right of way, measured from the centerline
of Route 10. The right way shall be dedicated to the County, free,
unrestricted, and at no expense, at such time as the County prepares to
improve Route 10 and the improvements necessitate all or part of the
additional right of way. Said agreement shall be recorded and binding
upon all successors.
CONDITIONS
5.(a) Setbacks along Route 10. All buildings and drives shall have a
minimum seventy-five foot setback from the existing
right-of-way of Route 10. Parking areas shall have a minimum
one hundred foot setback from the proposed right-of-way of
Route 10. The parking area setback may be reduced to
seventy-five feet when parking areas are located to the side or
rear of buildings. Within these setbacks, landscaping shall be
provided in accordance with Condition 10 (f).
14. Delete.
87SO24/BSAPR7/MAR25SS
Fe��ee��►-��3-�98�-6g6
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO24
Chesterfield Meadows Shopping
Center Associates, L.P.
Matoaca Magisterial District
East line of Iron Bridge Road
REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Convenience Business (B-1) of 1.5
acres, amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case
84SO82) on an adjacent 5.5 acre tract zoned Convenience Business
(B-1) plus a Conditional Use Planned Development on the entire 7.0.
acre tract. A shopping center is planned.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGES 1 THROUGH 11.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A. The proposed zoning and land use conform to the Central Area Land
Use and Transportation Plan.
B. Through the Conditional Use Planned Development process, the Commis-
sion and Board can ensure quality development and proper land use
transition between commercial development to the north and residen-
tial development to the east and west.
C. The proposed zoning and land use are representative of development
trends along the Route 10 corridor.
D. The conditions recommended herein are consistent with the proposed
development standards for the "Route 10 Overlay District."
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
rnMnTTTnNQ
(STAFF/CPC) 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Clower and Associates, Inc., dated December 16,
1986, and the Textual Statement submitted with the appli-
cation shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
(STAFF) 2. Signs shall comply with the requirements of the Special
Sign District for shopping centers or similar groups of
buildings in a Convenience Business (B-1) District.
Landscaping shall be provided around the base of the
freestanding sign. Sign colors and styles shall be com-
patible with the architectural style of the buildings.
Prior to the erection of any signs, a complete sign pack-
age depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval. (P)
(CPC) 2. Except as stated herein, signs shall comply with the
requirements of the Special Sign District for shopping
centers or similar groups of buildings in a Convenience
Business (B-1) District. Through schematic plan review of
an overall sign package, the Planning Commission may
permit those buildings located within 200 feet of Route
10, that have entrances which do not front onto Route 10
(i.e., entrance doors facing away from, or perpendicular
to, Route 10), a second building -mounted sign not to
exceed twenty (20) square feet in area (i.e., twenty (20)
square feet in addition to the aggregate square footage
permitted for each individual tenant). However, only one
(1) sign shall be legible from Route 10.
A restaurant with a drive-in window shall be permitted a
freestanding menu board, not to exceed twenty-five (25)
square feet and a height of six (6) feet, provided it is
positioned so as not to be legible from public roads.
(CPC)
(STAFF/CPC) 3. The request parcels may be considered one (1) zoning lot
for the purpose of calculating parking and setback re-
quirements if the tract is subdivided and sold to differ-
ent entities. If the request property is subdivided and
driveways and parking areas are to be used in common by
the tenants located on the property, cross easement agree-
ments shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
approval. Upon approval, the cross easement agreements
shall be recorded. (P)
(Note: Should any parcel be subdivided or sold without an
approved cross easement agreement, parking and setback
requirements will be calculated individually and separate
from the original request parcels.)
(STAFF/CPC) 4. In addition to Convenience Business (B-1) uses, the fol-
lowing use exceptions shall be permitted:
2 87S024/BSJAN7/MAR25S
M
M
a. Tire store with automotive repair, provided the bays
are positioned so as not to be visible from public
roads or adjacent properties
b. Restaurant with drive-thru window
C. Health club
d. Print shop
e. Liquor store `
f. Veterinary clinic, provided there is no overnight
boarding or outside runs
g. Department store
h. An outdoor cafe or patio dining in conjunction with a
restaurant which does not have a drive-thru window
i. Building supply with outdoor display and/or storage,
provided the outdoor display/storage area is screened
from view of adjacent properties and public rights of
way. The method of screening shall be approved by
the Planning Commission at the time of schematic plan
review. (P)
Further, one (1) use shall be permitted an exception to
the 12,000 gross square foot limitation provided the gross
area does not exceed 32,000 square feet. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 5. Yards. The following yard requirements shall apply:
(a) Setbacks along Route 10. All buildings and drives
shall have a minimum seventy-five foot setback from
the proposed right-of-way of Route 10 as indicated on
the Chesterfield General Plan, as amended. Parking
areas shall have a minimum one hundred foot setback
from the proposed right-of-way of Route 10. The
parking area setback may be reduced to seventy-five
feet when parking areas are located to the side or
rear of buildings. Within these setbacks, landscap-
ing shall be provided in accordance with Condition 10
(f) .
(b) Setbacks along Chesterfield Meadows Drive. The front
yard setback for buildings, drives, and parking areas
shall be a minimum of forty feet from Chesterfield
Meadows Drive.
(c) Side yards. The side yard setbacks for buildings,
drives, and parking areas shall be a minimum of
thirty feet. One foot shall be added to each side
yard for each three feet that the building height
adjacent thereto exceeds forty-five feet or three
stories, whichever is less, subject, however, to the
provisions of Section 21-27 of the Zoning Ordinance.
(d) Rear yard. The minimum rear yard setback for build-
ings, drives, and parking areas shall be fifty feet.
One foot shall be added to each rear yard for each
3 875024/BSJAN7/MAR25S
three feet that the building height adjacent thereto
exceeds forty-five feet or three stories, whichever
is less, subject, however, to the provisions of
Section 21-27 of the Zoning Ordinance. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 6. Permitted Variations in Yard Requirements.
The required minimum yards may be reduced as follows with
the provision of additional landscaping:
(a) Setbacks along Route 10. The required setback for
buildings and drives along Route 10 may be reduced to
fifty (50) feet with the provision of landscaping in
accordance with Condition 10 (g) (3), "Perimeter
Landscaping C." The required setback for parking
areas may be reduced to fifty (50) feet with the
provision of landscaping in accordance with Condition
10 (g) (3), "Perimeter Landscaping C," and when such
parking areas are located to the side and rear_ of
buildings.
(b) Setbacks along Chesterfield Meadows Drive. The
required setbacks along Chesterfield Meadows Drive
may be reduced to thirty (30) feet for buildings and
fifteen (15) feet for parking areas and drives with
the provision of landscaping in accordance with
Condition 10 (g) (3), "Perimeter Landscaping C."
(c) Side yard. The required side yard may be reduced to
ten (10) feet with the provision of landscaping in
accordance with Condition 10 (g) (2), "Perimeter
Landscaping B."
(d) Rear yard. The required rear yard may be reduced to
twenty-five (25) feet with the provision of landscap-
ing in accordance with Condition 13; however, at a
minimum, landscaping shall be provided in accordance
with Condition 10 (g) 2, "Perimeter Landscaping B."
(P)
(STAFF/CPC) 7. Utility lines underground. All utility lines such as
electric, telephone, CATV, or other similar lines shall be
installed underground. This requirement shall apply to
lines serving individual sites as well as to utility lines
necessary within the project. All junction and access
boxes shall be screened with appropriate landscaping. All
utility pad fixtures and meters shall be shown on the site
plan. The necessity for utility connections, meter boxes,
etc., shall be recognized and integrated with the archi-
tectural elements of the site plan. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 8. Loading areas. Sites shall be designed and buildings
shall be oriented so that loading areas are not visible
87SO24/BSJAN7/MAR25S
M
EWA
from the adjacent residential properties or from any
public right of way. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 9. Driveways and parking areas. Driveways and parking areas
shall be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete, or
other similar material. Surface treated parking areas and
drives shall be prohibited. Concrete curb and gutter
shall be installed around the perimeter of all driveways
and parking areas. Drainage shall be designed so as not
to interfere with pedestrian traffic. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 10. Landscaping Requirements.
(a) Purpose and Intent.
A comprehensive landscaping program for the site is
essential for the visual enhancement of the Corridor;
and to protect and promote the appearance, character,
and economic values of land along the Corridor and
surrounding neighborhoods. The purpose and intent of
such landscaping requirements is also to reduce the
visibility of paved areas from adjacent properties
and streets, moderate climatic effects, minimize
noise and glare, and enhance public safety by defin-
ing spaces to influence traffic movement. Landscap-
ing will reduce the amount of storm water runoff and
provide transition between neighboring properties.
(b) Landscaping Plan and Planting Requirements.
(1) A landscaping plan shall be submitted in con-
junction with site plan review.
(2) Such landscaping plan shall be drawn to scale,
including dimensions and distances, and clearly
delineate all existing and proposed parking
spaces or other vehicle areas, access aisles,
driveways, and the location, size and descrip-
tion of all landscaping materials.
(c) Plant Materials Specifications.
(1) Quality.
All plant materials shall be living and in a
healthy condition. Plant materials used in
conformance with the provision of these speci-
fications shall conform to the standards of the
most recent edition of the "American Standard
for Nursery Stock," published by the American
Association of Nurserymen.
5 87S024/BSJAN7/MAR25S
(2) Size and Type.
(a) Small Deciduous Trees. Small deciduous
trees shall be of a species having an
average minimum mature crown spread of
greater than twelve (12) feet. A minimum
caliper of at least two and one-half (2
1/2) inches at the time of planting shall
be required.
(b) Large Deciduous Trees. Large deciduous
trees shall be of a species having an
average minimum mature crown spread of
greater than thirty (30) feet. A minimum
caliper of at least three and one-half (3
1/2) inches at the time of planting shall
be required.
(c) Evergreen trees. Evergreen trees shall
have a minimum height of five (5) feet at
the time of planting.
(d) Medium shrubs. Shrubs and hedge forms
shall have a minimum height of two (2) feet
at the time of planting.
(3) Landscaping Design.
(a) Generally, planting required by this sec-
tion should be in an irregular line and
spaced at random.
(b) Clustering of plant and tree species shall
be required to provide a pleasing composi-
tion and mix of vegetation.
(c) Decorative walls and fences may be inte-
grated into any landscaping program. The
use of such walls or fences, when having a
minimum height of three (3) feet, may
reduce the amount of required plant mate-
rials at the discretion of the Director of
Planning.
(4) Tree Preservation.
(a) Preservation of existing trees is en-
couraged to provide continuity, improved
buffering ability, pleasing scale and image
along the Corridor.
6 87S024/BSJAN7/MAR25S
(b) Any healthy existing
for credit towards the
Condition.
(d) Maintenance.
tree may be included
requirements of this
(1) The owner, or his agent, shall be responsible
for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of
all landscaping materials as may be required.
(2) All plant material shall be tended and main-
tained in a healthy growing condition and free
from refuse and debris at all times. All un-
healthy, dying or dead plant materials shall be
replaced during the next planting season.
(3) All landscaped areas shall be provided with a
readily available water supply. The utilization
of underground storage chambers to collect
runoff to be later used to irrigate plant mate-
rials is encouraged.
(e) Installation and Bonding Requirements.
(1) All landscaping shall be installed in a sound,
workmanship -like manner and according to accept-
ed, good planting practices and procedures.
Landscaped areas shall require protection from
vehicular encroachment by such means as, but not
limited to, wheel stops or concrete or
bituminous curbs.
(2) Where landscaping is required, no certificate of
occupancy shall be issued until the required
landscaping is completed in accordance with the
approved landscape plan. When the occupancy of
a structure is desired prior to the completion
of the required landscaping, a certificate of
occupancy may be issued only if the owner or
developer provides to the County a form of
surety satisfactory to the Planning Department
in an amount equal to the costs of the remaining
plant materials, related materials and installa-
tion costs.
(3) All required landscaping shall be installed and
approved by the first planting season following
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the
bond shall be forfeited to the County.
(f) Arterial Frontage Landscaping.
Landscaping shall be required along Route 10 within
the required setback and shall be provided except
7 87S024/BSJAN7/MAR25S
where driveways or other openings may be necessary.
The minimum required landscaping for this setback
shall be provided as per "Perimeter Landscaping B"
below.
(g) Perimeter Landscaping.
Landscaping shall be provided at the outer boundaries
or in the required yards, except where driveways or
other openings may be required. The minimum required
landscaping for all outer boundaries of any lot or
parcel shall be provided as per "Perimeter Landscap-
ing A" below. There shall be different landscaping
requirements as identified herein, which shall be
provided as follows:
(1) Perimeter Landscaping A.
(a) At least one small deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen for each fifty lineal feet shall
be planted within the setback area.
(b) At least one medium shrub for each twenty
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(c) Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
(2) Perimeter Landscaping B.
(a) At least one large deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen for each thirty lineal feet shall
be planted within the setback area.
(b) At least one small deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet shall be planted within
the setback area.
(c) At least one medium shrub for each fifteen
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(d) Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
OR:
(a) A minimum three (3) foot high undulating
berm, and
8 87SO24/BSJAN7/MAR25S
(b) Perimeter Landscaping A.
(3) Perimeter Landscaping C.
(a) At least one large deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen tree for each thirty lineal feet
shall be planted within the setback area.
(b) At least one small deciduous tree for each
thirty lineal feet shall be planted within
the setback area.
(c) At least one medium shrub for each ten
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(d) Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
OR:
(a) A minimum four (4) foot high undulating
berm, and
(b) Perimeter Landscaping B.
(h) Landscaping Standards for Parking Areas.
(1) Interior parking area landscaping.
(a) The parking area(s) shall have at least
twenty (20) square feet of interior land-
scaping for each space. Each required
landscaped area shall contain a minimum of
100 square feet and have a minimum dimen-
sion of at least ten feet. With the pro-
vision of this landscaping, parking space
size may be reduced to 9.5 x 18 feet or 171
square feet.
(b) The primary landscaping material used in
parking areas shall be trees which provide
shade or are capable of providing shade at
maturity. Each required landscaped area
shall include at least one small tree, as
outlined in this Condition. The total
number of trees shall not be less than one
for each 200 square feet, or fraction
thereof, of required interior landscaped
area. The remaining area shall be land-
scaped with shrubs and other vegetative
9 87SO24/BSJAN7/MAR25S
material to compliment the tree
landscaping.
(c) Landscaping areas shall be reasonably
dispersed throughout, located so as to
divide and break up the expanse of paving.
The area designated as required setbacks
shall not be calculated as required land-
scaped area.
(2) Peripheral parking area landscaping.
(a) Peripheral landscaping shall be required
along any side of a parking area that abuts
land not in the right of way of a street
such that:
A landscaped strip at least ten (10) feet
in width shall be located between the
parking area and the abutting property
lines, except where driveways or other
openings may be required. Continuous hedge
forms or at least one small tree, as
outlined in this Condition, shall be plant-
ed in the landscaped strip for each fifty
lineal feet. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 11. Exterior lighting. All exterior lights shall be arranged
and installed so that the direct or reflected illumination
does not exceed 0.5 foot candles above background measured
at the lot line of any adjoining residential district or
public right of way. Lighting standards shall be of a
directional type capable of shielding light source from
direct view. A lighting plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Department in conjunction with final site plan
review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 12. Architectural treatment. The architectural treatment of
all buildings shall be compatible with Chesterfield Mead-
ows Shopping Center and shall be such that no building
facade (whether front, side, or rear) consists of archi-
tectural materials inferior in quality, appearance, or
detail to any other facade of the same building. No
portion of a building constructed of unadorned cinder
block or corrugated and/or sheet metal shall be visible
from any adjoining property, or public right of way.
Mechanical equipment, whether ground -level or rooftop,
shall be shielded and screened from public view and de-
signed to be perceived as an integral part of the build-
ing. Detailed renderings depicting these requirements
shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval
in conjunction with site plan review. (P)
10 87S024/BSJAN7/MAR25S
n
n
(STAFF/CPC) 13. A minimum twenty-five (25) foot buffer shall be provided
along the eastern boundary where adjacent to residential
zoning. This buffer shall be landscaped, bermed, and/or
fenced so as to effectively screen the development from
the adjacent residential property. In conjunction with
schematic plan review, a conceptual plan depicting this
requirement shall be submitted to the Planning Commission
for approval. A detailed landscaping plan shall be sub-
mitted to the Planning Department for approval in conjunc-
tion with final site plan review. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 14. Prior to the release of any building permit, one hundred
(100) feet of right of way, measured from the centerline
of Route 10, shall be dedicated to and for the County of
Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. This condition may
be modified by the Planning Commission at the time of
schematic plan review. (T&CPC)
(STAFF/CPC) 15. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, additional.
pavement, curb, and gutter shall be constructed along
Route 10 for the entire property frontage. This condition
may be modified by the Planning Commission at the time of
schematic plan review. (T&CPC)
(STAFF/CPC) 16. Access for this development shall be limited to
Chesterfield Meadows Drive. There shall be no direct
access to Route 10. The exact location of access shall be
approved by the Transportation Department at the time of
schematic plan review. This condition may be modified by
the Planning Commission at the time of schematic plan
review. (T&CPC)
(STAFF/CPC) 17. Public water and sewer shall be used. (U)
(Note: The conditions stated herein supersede all previ-
ously imposed conditions of Conditional Use Planned Devel-
opment 845082 for Tract D.)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: East line of Iron Bridge Road, across from
Greenyard Road. Tax Map 96-9 (1) Parcel 7
and Part of Parcel 6, and Tax Map 96-13 (1)
Parcel 2 (Sheet 31).
Existing Zoning: A, A with a Conditional Use to permit a
professional office and B-1 with Condition-
al Use Planned Development to permit a
shopping center
Size: 7.0 acres
11
875024/BSJAN7/MAR25S
Existing Land Use: Office and vacant
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - B-1 and 0 with Conditional Use
Planned Development; Shopping center
or vacant
South - A; Single family residential or
vacant
East - R-TH with Conditional Use Planned
Development; Vacant
West - A and R-40; Semi-public (church
under construction) and vacant
Utilities: 8 inch water line located along
Chesterfield Meadows Drive. Use of public
water intended (Condition 17). Lies in
Proctors Creek sewage drainage area. 8
inch trunk sewer located along Chesterfield
Meadows Drive. Use of public sewer intend-
ed. (Condition 17)
Environmental Engineering: Site drains to existing storm sewer located
in Chesterfield Meadows Drive. Concrete
curb and gutter should be installed around
the perimeter of all parking areas and
driveways. (Condition 9)
Fire Service: Chester Fire Station, Company #1. At
present, fire service capability is ade-
quate. County water and fire hydrants must
be installed in compliance with nationally
recognized standards.
General Plan
(Central Area Land
Use and Transporta-
tion Plan): Light commercial
Transportation: The proposed development could generate
approximately 8,460 average daily trips.
These vehicles will be distributed along
Iron Bridge Road which had a 1985 traffic
count of 18,650 vehicles per day.
The Master Plan depicts three (3) points of
access for this development, two (2) to
Chesterfield Meadows Drive, and one (1) to
Route 10. Staff has consistently recom-
mended controlling access along major
arterials such as Route 10. The proposed
access to Route 10 is not desirable due to
its proximity to Chesterfield Meadows Drive
and because it would result in the place-
ment of an entrance/exit with vehicular
12 87S024/BSJAN7/MAR25S
turning movements directly onto the turn
lane for Chesterfield Meadows Drive (Condi-
tion- 16). Additional access to Route 10
for this development could be considered if
additional property to the south were
incorporated into the request.
Additional pavement, curb, and gutter
should be constructed along Route 10 to
facilitate turning movements (Condition
15). The Central Area Land Use and Trans-
portation Plan identifies Route 10 as a
major arterial with a recommended right of
way width of 120 to 200 feet. Right of way
should be dedicated in accordance with this
Plan. (Condition 14)
DISCUSSION
Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Convenience Business (B-1) of 1.5
acres, amendment to a previously approved Conditional Use Planned Devel-
opment (Case 84SO82) on an existing zoned Convenience Business (B-1) 5.5
acre tract, plus a Conditional Use Planned Development on the entire 7.0
acre tract is requested. It is the applicant's intent to develop the
entire 7.0 acre site for a shopping center compatible with the existing
Chesterfield Meadows Shopping Center located immediately to the north.
On November 28, 1984, the Board of Supervisors, upon favorable recommen-
dation of the Planning Commission, approved an amendment to a previously
granted zoning permitting development of a mixed use project composed of
commercial, office, townhouses, and single family residential. The
overall project is now commonly known as Chesterfield Meadows and
Wrexham. The 5.5 acre portion of the current request was identified as
Tract D in the previously granted Conditional Use Planned Development and
a shopping center was permitted to be developed on this tract through
previous zoning action. It should be noted that the conditions recom-
mended in conjunction with the current request would amend or supersede
the conditions of Case 84SO82 which relate to the development of Tract D.
The remaining 1.5 acres of the current request site was not included in
the 1984 zoning case. The current request would incorporate the entire
acreage into a Conditional Use Planned Development with the same con-
ditions applicable to the overall development.
The applicants are requesting the following use exceptions:
A. One B-1 use not to exceed 32,000 gross square feet
B. Tire store with automotive repair
C. Restaurant with drive-thru window
D. Bank with drive-thru window
E. Health club
F. Print shop
G. Liquor store
13 87SO24/BSJAN7/MAR25S
H. Veterinarian clinic, provided there is no overnight boarding
I. Convenience store with auxiliary gas pumps
J. Building supply with fenced storage yard
K. Department store
L. Car wash
M. Outdoor cafe or patio dining in conjunction with a restaurant
not having a drive-thru window.
It should be noted that a bank with drive-thru window and a convenience
store with auxiliary gas pumps are permitted uses in a B-1 District and,
therefore, exceptions for these particular uses are not necessary. Also
requested is a provision to allow the entire acreage to be considered as
one (1) zoning lot for the purpose of calculating the number of required
parking spaces and determining setbacks. Further, reduction in the
required size of parking spaces from 10 feet by 20 feet (200 square feet)
to 9.5 feet by 18 feet (171 square feet) is requested.
Property to the north of the request site is zoned Community Business
(B-1) and Office (0) with Conditional Use Planned Development and is the
site of Chesterfield Meadows Shopping Center and future office develop-
ment. Property to the east of the request is zoned Residential -Townhouse
(R-TH) with Conditional Use Planned Development and vacant, while proper-
ty to the south is zoned Agricultural (A) and is vacant. Adjacent prop-
erty along the west line of Route 10 is zoned Agricultural (A) and Res-
idential (R-40) and is currently under development for a church or is
presently vacant.
The Central Area Land Use and Transportation Plan designates the request
parcels for light commercial use. Further, the proposed zoning and land
use are representative of development trends along the Route 10 corridor.
The recommended conditions will help to ensure that a quality development
is achieved and that compatibility with the surrounding area is guaran-
teed by addressing concerns related to site design, access, turning
movements, and the proliferation of signs along Route 10.
The imposition of Condition 2 will provide limitations on signage consis-
tent with the requirements of the Special Sign District. Although the
request does not lie within the current boundaries of the Special Sign
District, the recommended condition is consistent with the proposed
development standards for the "Route-10 Overlay District." Condition 3
which would allow the various parcels to be considered as one (1) zoning
lot, similar to that permitted for Chesterfield Meadows Shopping Center.
A cross easement agreement would permit a business or businesses on one
(1) parcel to utilize parking spaces located on another parcel in the
development when calculating the minimum number of on -site parking spaces
required by the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, it would allow the
required setbacks for buildings and other structures to be measured from
the outer boundaries of the zoning lot rather than from the interior
property lines of individual parcels.
It is Staff's opinion that the majority of the use exceptions requested
by the applicants are compatible with the character and intensity of
other proposed and existing uses in the area. Although the proposed
development standards for the "Route 10 Overlay District" indicates that
14 87SO24/BSJAN7/MAR25S
uses with drive-in windows and/or gas pumps, as well as all General
Business (B-3) uses, be incorporated into a development having a size of
ten (10) acres or more, the seven (7) acres which are the subject of the
current request are actually part of a larger 74.0 acre development.
Therefore, the requested use exceptions are consistent with the proposed
"Route 10 Overlay District" standards. Staff has supported all of the
requested use exceptions except a car wash. Given the site design and
the surrounding land uses, there is some concern that the car wash would
be incompatible with character of the area and surrounding development.
Previous conditions of Case 84SO82 allowed all of the requested use
exceptions except a tire store with automotive repair, building supply
with fenced storage yard, department store, and car wash were permitted
by the previous Conditional Use Planned Development. It should further
be noted that the previous Conditional Use Planned Development required
that all buildings located within 200 feet of Route 10 be restricted to
Office Business (0) uses, banks, and savings and loans. It should be
noted that current zoning allows gasoline sales in conjunction with a
convenience store on the subject parcel, but not on the already developed
portion of Chesterfield Meadows. Further, the request to permit a 20,000.
exception to the 12,000 square foot area allowed in a B-1 District, is
consistent with past exceptions granted by the Commission and Board for
the already zoned 5.5 acres. (Condition 4)
The imposition of landscaping and other site design standards consistent
with that proposed for the "Route 10 Overlay District" will ensure
quality development and minimize the impact on adjacent residentially
zoned properties north along Route 10. The Overlay District standards
also afford the applicants the opportunity to reduce certain setbacks
normally required for buildings, parking areas, and driveways through the
provision of additional landscaping (Conditions 5-10). Consideration
should also be given to the architectural style of the buildings to
ensure quality site design and to promote architectural compatibility
with the adjacent commercial development to the north and to enhance and
maintain the architectural integrity of the area (Condition 12). Low
level, directional lighting will also serve to minimize the impact of the
development on adjacent properties and vehicular traffic along Route 10.
(Condition 11)
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. O'Connor, seconded by Mr. Cowan, the Commission recom-
mended approval of this request, subject to the conditions on pages 1
through 11.
AYES: Messrs. Miller, O'Connor, Cowan, and Rowe.
ABSENT: Mr. Belcher.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
15 875024/BSJAN7/MAR25S
r S7AT�T Fh
THOUSE
1PLEX
vi
y�•�. COURTHOUSE WOODS
I\ , t���.
id\ 11 S
CENTRALIA RD.�����„�.�
CHESTERFIELD MEADOWS ,
O WREXHAM ESTATES \
�i
00
•
R-12 �'••
GREENYARD st aF�E Rom/low
SHE •6; '''h�'� s6' • •
R D.
yP i .
•
a •
A
•� A
B-1 1.■.1n1 ..�.�
87SO24
Lot ,,'"'''',•,,•..,,,, REZ:®A TO B-1
' ' AMEND C.U.PD.
OC.U.PD
M—� SH. 31
R-7 5
^
OIL
0,00
to
von
"rrrl�
FebffeafY-1-7;-1984-GPG
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO25
Cowles R. and Katherine Garrison
Clover Hill Magisterial District
Northwest line of Northwich Terrace
REQUEST: Amendment to previously granted Conditional Use Planned Development
(Case 74SO21) to permit a .5 foot exception to the required two (2)
foot side yard setback. A single family dwelling currently exists
on the property.
RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A.
The house has been in this location
for approximately
nine (9) years
with no adverse impact.
B.
The request will not adversely affect the welfare
or safety of
persons residing on the premises or
the neighborhood in general.
C.
Encroachment will not unreasonably
impair an adequate
supply of air
and light to the adjacent property.
D.
The request will not impair the
character of this residential
district.
E. The request will not reduce or impair the value of the buildings or
property in the surrounding areas.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: Fronts approximately 62 feet on the north-
west line of Northwich Terrace, approxi-
mately 460 feet southwest of Northwich
Road. Tax Map 61-4 (7) Northwich, Section
2, Lot 48 (Sheet 20).
Existing Zoning: R-7 with Conditional Use Planned
Development
Size:
Existing Land Use:
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use:
Utilities, Environmental
Engineering, Schools, Fire
and Transportation:
General Plan
(Powhite/Route 288
Development Area Land
Use and Transportation
Plan):
nTgrURSTnN
.2 acres
Single family residential
North and South: Open space/golf
course
East and West: Single family
residential or vacant
This request will have no impact on
Utilities, Environmental Engineering,
Schools, Fire, or Transportation
concerns.
Medium/high density residential
(4.01-7.0 units/acre)
The existing dwelling on this request is approximately nine years old
and, when constructed, was located 1.5 feet off the side lot line. The
Conditional Use Planned Development for Brandermill requires a minimum 2
foot side yard setback. Therefore, the applicant requests a 0.5 foot
exception (see the attached site plan).
Staff visited the site and found that the dwelling does not cause a line
of sight problem for adjacent property, nor does it seriously reduce air
and light in the applicant's side yard. There is a ten (10) foot strip
of open space recorded between the subject home and the dwelling located
directly to the southwest. This open space provides sufficient sepa-
ration between structures. Due to the location of the open space and the
minimal exception being requested, Staff feels that this request will
have no adverse effect on adjacent property and supports the request.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. O'Connor, seconded by Mr. Cowan, the Commission recom-
mended approval of this request.
AYES: Unanimous.
2 875025/BSJAN7/MAR25T
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
3 87S025/BSJAN7/MAR25T
CREEK RESERVOIR
e 875025
AMEND CURD
ASH. 20
G
Jn/((
00
4�
ZllAC
87 SOZS-1
February-4!;T--1984-GPG
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO26
First Virginia Bank
and
Investors SZvings Bank
Matoaca Magisterial District
East line of Iron Bridge Road
REQUEST: Amendment to a Conditional Use Planned Development (Cases 84SO82 and
85SO82) relative to signs. Specifically, two (2) freestanding signs
to identify two (2) financial institutions within Chesterfield_
Meadows Shopping Center are requested. Conditions of zoning do not
allow individual establishments within the shopping center to have
freestanding signs.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGES 1 AND 2.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
A. The character of the freestanding sign structures are consistent
with the conditions imposed by Conditional Use Planned Developments
(Cases 84SO82 and 85SO82). Furthermore, the design and composition
of the structures are aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the
architectural style of the overall development.
B. The location, character, size, and style of the proposed signs do
not violate the spirit and intent of the conditions of zoning.
Specifically, the conditions of zoning, as they relate to signs,
were to minimize sign proliferation and garish signs along the
public roadways and adjacent properties.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
rnNnTTTnNS
(STAFF/CPC) 1. Two (2) freestanding signs shall be permitted to identify
the uses located within the two (2) existing structures.
The size, color, height, materials, lighting, and location
of the freestanding signs shall be as depicted on the site
plan, elevations, renderings, and Textual Statements
submitted with the application. Landscaping shall be
installed around the base of the freestanding signs. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 2. In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
Planning Commission shall grant schematic sign approval of
the two (2) signs. (P)
(Note: These conditions are in addition to Conditions 4
and 8 of Conditional Use Planned Development [Case 85SO821
and Condition 13[b] of Conditional Use Planned Development
[Case 84SO82].)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
Existing Zoning:
Size:
Existing Land Use:
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use:
Utilities; Environmental
Engineering; Fire Service;
and Transportation:
General Plan
(Central Area Land
Use and Transporta-
tion Plan):
DISCUSSION
Southeast quadrant of Iron Bridge and
Centralia Roads. Tax Map 96-9 (1) Part of
Parcel 20 (Sheet 31).
B-1 with Conditional Use Planned
Development
3 acres
Commercial
North - A with Conditional Use to permit
offices; Vacant
South - B-1 with Conditional Use Planned
Development; Commercial
East - B-1 with Conditional Use Planned
Development; Commercial
West - A; Vacant
The proposed amendments will have no impact
on these facilities.
Light Commercial
An amendment to previously approved Conditional Use Planned Developments
(Cases 84SO82 and 85SO82) is requested to permit two (2) freestanding
signs for two (2) existing financial institutions located in Chesterfield
Meadows Shopping Center. These structures are located on "pad" sites
within the center.
2 87SO26/BSJAN7/MAR25U
Within the shopping center, those buildings located within 200 feet of
Route 10 that have entrances which do not front onto Route 10 are allowed
two (2) building -mounted signs. -One sign may not exceed twenty (20)
square feet and the second sign may not exceed 0.5 square feet for each
one (1) foot of building frontage. Only one of the building -mounted
signs may be legible from Route 10. Building -mounted signs have been
placed on both structures and these signs have been positioned such that
they are legible from Route 10. The applicants have indicated, however,
that building -mounted signs on the facades which face the interior of the
shopping center would detract from the architectural features of both
structures. The current request would allow one (1) freestanding sign
for each structure. The freestanding signs would serve as a means of
identification from within the shopping center. The sign will primarily
be visible only from the interior of the shopping center.
The requested amendment and the design of the proposed signs are consis-
tent with the spirit and intent of the previously imposed sign conditions
for the shopping center. Specifically, because of the location of the
signs, sign proliferation will not occur along Route 10 or Centralia_
Road. In addition, the signs are compatible with the architectural style
of the development.
While there is some merit to the granting of the request, especially
since the proposed signs do not represent a violation of the intent to
minimize sign proliferation along major roadways, the Commission and
Board may wish to consider modifications or amendments in the future to
the Special Sign District regulations to allow freestanding sign identi-
fication within developments provided such signs are positioned such that
they are legible only from within the development and not from the
roadway.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. Rowe, the Commission recommend-
ed approval of this request, subject to the conditions on pages 1 and 2.
AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
3 875026/BSJAN7/MAR25U
NIC I ^ ♦♦
ME'.
Q Z L S ♦♦:
9r
F pR.
i r sr4T`T f
CKESTERr F —D \
URUSE
COMPLTHOEX
= I \ 4 \
I I1I 1111.,11 : �1 1111(T1 � f ~ �
� f r 5 %11IiIMO c ,�t q
d HI sill
Jam: hUSTIWG a
11111.=11111� ' UR HOUSE WOOD R-9 \\
VIAL
�s,
�c �
1sale c c c °
— S 11111
11111
• �,'♦ c `-Q CENTRALIA RD. 11 its 1tit, 11111111,111 /A
1111111III /'"�
C I •
a ;
40
00
Q _ �;•• ; : WREXHAM ESTATES
Q f
CHEST RFIELD MEADOWS10 • Q /�
` ����, W5•����,',, i
J Epp •���, 00
/"� EgtEaF�E�p M R-Ty
GREENYARD G� c
wo
c ■
�p qR D c ■
•
GR �
II 1111 �
N A
17— 40 I111 11/1111111111 111111111 \87S026
AMEND CURD.
B-/ EIIIIIII Iloilo k —SH. 31
c
`� WII IIIW�.••,I
��i.lI1tMots
875o26-I
% "lillw Na
C`cNT
/q
` R
'PROPOSED SIGN
LOCATION
' A
I
PROPOSED SIGN
p�3 LOCATION
k
V�I
• Osmr
67 5 0 26 --2
FIRST
VIRGINIA
BANK
87SOZ6-3
m
m
:,t • -9 C;,e WWIIL '.I F-
4B"
NVESTORS
E F l.
Bank
875026-4
Me*eh-44T-1984-GPG
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO33
Sigma, G.J. Associates
and
Petula Associates, Ltd.
Midlothian Magisterial District
West line of Chippenham Parkway
REQUEST: Amendments to Conditional Use Planned Developments (Cases 82SO66 and
83SO91) to permit construction of a total of two (2) eight -story
office buildings in either Boulders I or Boulders II.; or one (1)
eight -story office building in Boulders I and one (1) eight -story
office building in Boulders II. Conditions of zoning for Boulders I
allow two (2) eight -story office buildings and an eight -story hotel
with the remaining structures being limited to a maximum height of
six (6) stories. All Boulders II buildings were restricted to a
maximum height of six (6) stories.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION ON PAGE 1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reason:
The requested amendments will not have any adverse impact on existing or
future area development or land use. Further, the request does not
represent any increase in the total square footage or numbers of build-
ings approved through previous zoning actions.
CONDITION
(STAFF/CPC) Within Boulders I and Boulders II, with the exception of three
(3) buildings to include a hotel, no structure shall exceed a
height of six (6) stories. The three (3) structures to include
the hotel shall not exceed a height of eight (8) stories. The
hotel, however, shall be located in Boulders I. (P)
(Note: This condition supersedes Condition 20 of Case 82SO66
and Condition 28 of Case 835091.)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: West line of Chippenham Parkway, south line
of Jahnke Road, and east and west lines of
Chinaberry Boulevard. Tax Map 19-1 (1)
Parcel 16 and Tax Map 19-9 (1) Parcel 8
(Sheet 8).
Existing Zoning:
0 with Conditional Use Planned Development
Size:
153 acres
Existing Land Use:
Office or vacant
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use:
North - R-15 and 0 with Conditional Use
Planned Development; Single family
residential or vacant
South - R-7 with Conditional Use and B-2;
Multifamily residential and
commercial
East - City of Richmond;
Public/semi-public, office or
vacant
West - R-7 with Conditional Use and R-7;
Multifamily and single family
residential
Utilities:
12 inch water line located along Chinaberry
Boulevard. Pumps may be required to insure
adequate water pressure in buildings.
Lies in Powhite Creek sewage drainage area.
Public sewer is available.
Environmental Engineering
and Transportation: The requested amendment will have minimal
impact on these facilities.
Fire Service: Buford Fire Station, Company #9. At pre-
sent, fire service capability is adequate.
Water flows and fire hydrants must be
provided in compliance with nationally
recognized standards. Sites must be devel-
oped to provide maximum fire apparatus
accessibility. Fire lanes must be provided
in compliance with nationally recognized
standards.
General Plan
(Jahnke/Chippenham
Development Area Land
Use and Transportation
Plan): Office
2 BSJAN7/MAR25V
nTSCTTRSTnN
Amendments to previously approved Conditional Use Planned Developments
(Cases 82SO66 and 83SO91) to permit exceptions to building height limita-
tions are requested. Specifically, a maximum of two (2) eight -story
office buildings are desired on the Boulders I and Boulders II project
sites. Under the current conditions of zoning, only the Boulders I
project site (Case 82SO66) is permitted eight -story structures. Specif-
ically, Boulders I is allowed two (2) eight -story office buildings, one
(1) eight -story hotel and the remaining structures are limited to six (6)
stories. Boulders II is currently limited to six -story structures (Case
83S091). The current proposal would allow the two (2) eight -story office
structures, previously permitted in Boulders I, to be located in either
Boulders I or Boulders II or one (1) in Boulders I and one (1) in Boul-
ders II. The eight -story hotel would still be located in Boulders I.
(Condition)
Allowing the eight -story office buildings in Boulders II would have the
effect of locating the buildings further away from the single family
residential area along Jahnke Road. Approval of the request should not
have any adverse affect on area development trends or the quality of
development. Because the request would not involve any increase in the
permitted gross floor area or numbers of buildings in the Boulders I and
II projects, approval of the request will have a negligible impact on
traffic, utilities, and other services.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (3/17/87):
On motion of Mr. Cowan, seconded by Mr. Rowe, the Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to the condition on page 1.
AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
3 BSJAN7/MAR25v
F 4 o-
you
To
\ N
V 9 D
• jc a 7
ze
s GLEN ECHO PLACE`
'A
kSOl.1THAM
CITY OF
•-.,, RICHMOND
S I♦, V P \ L G
♦� c ��
\Z
♦ a
aP BON AIR MANOR ':: :' ��;::?:::;:; ' ;•4•:•:;:; 'i
a
ir-
zc
10
a S
V
"0
. I I
V. LAKE
ROXBURY SQUARE ` ° -�
ROCK CREEK i). APARTMENTS ,�•`''`�'''''''''
PARK I I
SOP. p ✓\ \ ) �'•'t''
. .aV 91A�i \ t •i
/ I BOULDER SPRINGS
`APARTMENTS
R-7
• • —/5 OULD RD.
Q
5 •. \:. e o \ B-2 V.
R �` '4 \ BEAUFONT MALL
00 ...nts
_ \
3 i = �I �� , e. B TURNPIKE
-3 •, a .,,.,n
• - _�875033 '
eB ,;,.. • AMEND C.U.PD.
=o "2 B_ , „
aI If �- 3 SH. 9
1 1 1 •
Pebrdef}--14T--1984-GPG
March 25, 1987 BS
REQUEST ANALYSIS
AND
RECOMMENDATION
87SO14
Bexley West Associates
Clover Hill Magisterial District
Lies northwest of the western terminus of Lockshire Drive
REQUEST: A Conditional Use to permit an outdoor recreational facility in a
Residential (R-15) District.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ON PAGES 1, 2, AND 3.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of the Conditional Use for the following reasons:
A. Adjacent properties will be developed as single family residences.
This use will be adequately buffered and, therefore, will have
minimal adverse impact on these areas.
B. Conditions can be imposed which will minimize Staff concerns with
adjacent land use compatibility.
(NOTE: THE CONDITIONS NOTED WITH "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF
AND THE COMMISSION. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "STAFF" ARE RECOMMENDED SOLELY BY
STAFF. CONDITIONS WITH ONLY A "CPC" ARE ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION.)
CONDITIONS
(STAFF/CPC) 1. The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated 12/15/86,
shall be considered the plan of development. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 2. Hours of operation shall be limited to between 8:00 a.m.
and 8:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday; between 8:00 a.m.
and 11:00 p.m., Friday through Saturday. Vehicular drive-
ways shall be barricaded with a locked gate between 8:00
p.m. and 8:00 a.m., Sunday through Thursday; and between
11:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., Friday and Saturday. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 3. All driveways and parking areas shall be curbed and gut-
tered. (EE)
(STAFF/CPC) 4. Parking shall be provided on the basis of one (1) space
for each ninety (90) square feet of combined swimming and
wading pool areas, and four (4) spaces for each tennis
court. (P)
(Note: The Zoning Ordinance requires that all driveways
and parking areas for six (6) or more vehicles be paved.
Also, the BOCA Code requires two-way driveways to be a
minimum of twenty-four (24) feet in width unless local
agencies grant exceptions. On a routine basis, driveways
serving parking lots containing up to fifteen (15) parking
spaces to be twenty (20) feet in width are permitted; and
driveways serving parking lots of sixteen (16) to thirty
(30) parking spaces to be twenty-two (22) feet in width.)
(STAFF/CPC) 5. There shall be no outside public address system or
speakers. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 6. All outdoor lighting shall be no higher than fifteen (15)
feet and shall be designed so as not to project light into
adjacent properties. All outdoor lighting shall be timed
not to permit illumination after 11:00 p.m. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 7. One (1) sign to be located at the entrance shall be per-
mitted. This sign shall not exceed three (3) square feet
in area and shall not be luminous nor illuminated. A
rendering of this sign shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval prior to erection. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 8. A fifty (50) foot building setback line and buffer strip
shall be maintained along the northern, southern, and
western property lines of this site. No facilities shall
be built within this buffer area, and it shall remain in
its natural state with no clearing or access permitted,
with the exception of the one (1) entrance driveway into
the facility. Additional berming, plantings, and orna-
mental fencing may be required to supplement this buffer,
as deemed necessary by the Planning Department at the time
of landscaping plan approval submitted under Condition 9.
(P)
(STAFF/CPC) 9. In conjunction with final site plan review, and prior to
the release of a building permit, a detailed landscaping
plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for
approval. (P)
(STAFF/CPC) 10. Transfer of ownership, and maintenance responsibility for
the recreational facility, to the Homeowner Association
shall not take place prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits for the recreation facilities, or prior to a bond
being posted providing for 100% surety of the completion
of all improvements to be made. (P)
2 7SO14/BSJAN7/MAR25K
n
Lon
(STAFF/CPC) 11. A commercial entrance shall be provided from St. Regis
Drive into the site. (VDOT)
(STAFF/CPC) 12. Public water and sewer shall be used. (U)
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location: Lies approximately 400 feet northwest of
the western terminus of Lockshire Drive.
Tax Map 39-13 (8) Bexley West, Section 1,
Block A, Lot 31 (Sheet 14).
Existing Zoning: R-15 with proffered conditions
Size: 2.2 acres
Existing Land Use: Vacant
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: North - R-15; Single family residential
or vacant
South - A & R-15; Single family
residential or vacant
East - R-15; Single family residential
or vacant
West - R-15; Single family residential
or vacant
Utilities: 8 inch water line located on -site. The
water line is located along the western
boundary of this lot and continues north
along St. Regis Drive. Off -site easements
will not be required for the extension of
public water. Use of public water is
recommended and intended. (Condition 12)
Located in the Falling Creek sewage drain-
age area. This site will be served by the
connection of a 6" sewer lateral into the
sewer system presently under construction
in Bexley West, Section 1 (Contract
S86-66D). Use of public sewer is recom-
mended and intended. (Condition 12)
Environmental Engineering: Site is steeply sloping and drains into
Lower Beaver Pond. There are no existing
on- or off -site drainage and/or erosion
problems; however, land disturbance could
create sedimentation of Lower Beaver pond.
No off -site drainage easements will be
necessary for proper development of this
site. Staff would note that this site may
have shallow rock in the pool site area.
3 87SO14/BSJAN7/MAR25K
Fire Service:
General Plan
(Northern Area Land
Use and Transporta-
tion Plan):
Transportation:
T)T9CUR RTnN
Staff would suggest a geotechnical inves-
tigation to verify this possibility.
Wagstaff Fire Station, Company #10
(paid/volunteer). At present, fire service
capability is good.
Medium density residential
(1.51-4.00 units/acre)
This request will have minimal impact on
area traffic patterns.
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use to permit an outdoor recre-
ational facility in a Residential (R-15) District. Staff is recommending
approval of the Conditional Use.
This facility will be directly adjacent to Lots 30 and 32, Block A of
Bexley West, Section 1 and to the west lies a residentially zoned parcel
which is anticipated to develop in the near future. Staff feels that in
order to keep this facility as a positive component within the community,
rather than a burden to the community, the following guidelines should be
maintained to assure proper development of the proposed site.
Because of the residential character of the adjacent areas, the recre-
ational facility should be required to limit its hours of operation to
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday; and between
8:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., Friday through Saturday. All vehicular drive-
ways should be barricaded with a locked gate between 8:00 p.m. and 8:00
a.m., Sunday through Thursday; and between 11:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.,
Friday through Saturday (Condition 2). In addition, a landscaping plan
should be approved by the Planning Department (Condition 9). The purpose
of this plan is to adequately screen adjacent residential properties and
should include berming and plantings. A fifty (50) foot building setback
and buffer strip should be maintained along each property line of this
site. No recreational facilities should be built within this buffer and
it should remain in its natural state with no clearing or access permit-
ted, with the exception of the one (1) entrance driveway into the facil-
ity. Additional berming, plantings, and ornamental fencing may be
required to supplement this buffer, as deemed necessary, by the Planning
Department at the time of landscaping plan approval. (Condition 8)
In order to minimize the possibility of unnecessary noise from this
facility, there should be no outside public address system or speakers
permitted at this facility (Condition 5). To limit the intensity of
light on adjacent property owners, all outdoor lighting should be no
higher than fifteen (15) feet and should be designed to project away from
4 'IsO14/BSJAN7/MAR25K
adjacent properties. All outdoor lighting should be timed not to permit
illumination after 11:00 p.m. (Condition 6)
To meet all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and BOCA Code, the
applicant will be required to pave all driveways and parking areas (Note
after Condition 4). In addition, all driveways and parking areas should
be curbed and guttered (Condition 3). All parking spaces shall measure
10'x20' with the exception of two (2) "handicapped" spaces 12'-6" x 20'.
To ensure that adequate parking is provided on site, the applicant should
be required to provide one (1) space per 90 square feet of pool area.
(Condition 4)
Staff would note concerns about the design criteria of the proposed
driveways and parking areas. It has been the experience of the Planning
Department that design of a recreational facility's driveway and parking
areas often is sub -standard in relation to the amount of daily traffic
which actually uses the facility. With this in mind, Staff would like to.
note that the applicant should design driveway and parking areas in a
fashion which meet the criteria as outlined in the VDH&T Subdivision
Street Requirements Manual. The final design of driveways and parking
areas should be coordinated with final site plan review. Additionally, a
commercial -type entrance will be required. (Condition 11)
For the identification of this facility, one (1) sign, to be located at
the entrance, may be permitted. This sign should not ,exceed three (3)
square feet in area and should not be luminous nor illuminated. A ren-
dering of the sign must be submitted to the Planning Department for
approval prior to erection. (Condition 7)
In order to assure full completion of this facility, transfer of owner-
ship and maintenance responsibility for the recreational facility to the
Homeowners Association should not take place prior to the issuance of
occupancy permits, or before a bond is posted with the County providing
100% surety of the completion of all improvements to be made. (Condition
10)
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (2/17/87):
On motion of Mr. O'Connor, seconded by Mr. Belcher, the Commission recom-
mended approval of this request, subject to the conditions on pages 1, 2,
and 3.
AYES: Unanimous.
The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, March 25, 1987, beginning at 2:00 p.m.,
will take under consideration this request.
5 875014/BSJAN7/MAR25K
/ COOP C�
x
O U
QL
5 �� Z
N _
i z
4
f
BEXLEY WEST 'A
p F�
N
I
o BEXLEY
4 PQ
t �•
1, Y � I � III/I � I• ,� � `
� 777
•
Y ,
VO
• On
• �k yi ,��•`� G R E G O R Y/ S
FLOOD H ZA AREA
c _ LAKE GEORGE '.- �.•` �•
C o HAMLET ♦♦ I>
n / 1 ��` ,♦
44-
eloo
% = R-9
RED
Io
;.ti••
B— 2
•• w ..(•• - 5ISISC.U. �
•,-
/SH. 14
l A U I N 0 �_ A l l l l l l l /11111 11 1•••••• A O •♦ / v\
—
4*16
O ,
G \ ' `fA�•�••
m
m
4
Q
m
0
z
v
875014-/
M
a�a
Ik"
875014-2
MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
March 25, 1987
ITEM NUMBER: 11. K.
Dinner and Work Session with Social Services Board
at 5:00 p.m. - Magnolia Grange
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
An agenda of items to be discussed will be presented at the
work session.
PREPARED BY:
ATTACHMENTS: YES O NO 0
SIGNATURE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
''7
IESTERFIELD COUN4
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
AGENDA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
HARRYG. DANIEL, CHAIRMAN
DALE DISTRICT
JESSE J. MAYES, VICE CHAIRMAN
MATOACA DISTRICT
G. H. APPLEGATE
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
R. GARLAND DODD
BERMUDA DISTRICT
JOAN GIRONE
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
RICHARD L. HEDRICK
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: March 25, 1987 COURTHOUSE TIME: 5:00 P.M.
5:00 P.M.
6:00 P.M.
AGENDA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ump
BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
MAGNOLIA GRANGE
Call to Order Harry Daniel, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
Invocation
Dinner
Opening Remarks
Program Review;
Current Trends
Funding Issues and
Responsibilities
Placement Needs of
Adolescents
Relationship with
Colonial Heights
Summary of Department Needs
6:45 P.M. Discussion
David Phillips, Member
Board of Social Services
Elsie S. Elmore, Chairman
Board of Social Services
Jean Smith, Director
Dept. of Social Services
David Phillips, Member
Board of Social Services
Janice Mack, Member
Board of Social Services
James Pond, Vice -Chairman
Board of Social Services
Elsie S. Elmore, Chairman
Board of Social Services
Harry Daniel, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
%W (1
State Board of Social Services
Chesterfield Richmond Regional Office Colonial Heights
Board of Supervisors City Council
1
Social Services
Board of Social Services
Director
Administration
Eligibility
Child Protective Services Clerical Support Food Stamps
Foster Care/Adoptions Financial/ Intake Benefit Programs
Statistical
Services
Adult/Family Services
Ongoing Benefit Programs
Counseling/Supervision Fuel Assistance
(2)
M
In
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES PROGRAMS
BENEFIT PROGRAMS
Food Stamps
Aid to Dependent Children
Medicaid
Auxiliary Grants
General Relief
Refugee _
State/Local Hospitalization
Fuel Assistance
SOCIAL SERVICES
Intake
Child Protection
Foster Care/Adoptions
Family Services
Adult Services
Adult Protection
Employment
�w (3)
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE CASES
AVERAGE MONTHLY NUMBER OF CASES RECEIVING ADC
1984-85 - Chesterfield 582
Colonial Heights 60
TOTAL 642
1985-86 - Chesterfield
Colonial Heights
TOTAL
667
66
733
Increase in Public Assistance Cases - 14.2°%
AVERAGE MONTHLY NUMBER OF CASES RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
1984-85 1,525
1985-86
1,404
Decrease in Food Stamp Cases - 7.9%
Increase in applications for,Food Stamps - 2.7%
AVERAGE MONTHLY NUMBER OF CASES RECEIVING MEDICAID
1984-85 - Chesterfield 1,089
Colonial Heights 177
TOTAL 1,266
1985-86 - Chesterfield 1,218
Colonial Heights 189
TOTAL 1,407
Increase in Medicaid Cases - 11.2%
1984-85 Applications Received- Chesterfield 678
Colonial Heights 82
TOTAL 760
1985-86 Applications Received- Chesterfield 901
Colonial Heights 116
TOTAL 1,017
Increase in Applications for Medicaid - 33.8%
n
(4)
In
1985-86 AVERAGE MONTHLY NUMBER OF CASES - Chesterfield
Colonial Heights
TOTAL
CHILD ABUSE/NEGLECT REFERRALS
1985-86 Chesterfield
Colonial Heights
TOTAL
1986-87 (July -December) Chesterfield
Colonial Heights
TOTAL
MAJOR TYPES OF ABUSE/NEGLECT REFERRALS
Lack of Supervision
Physical Abuse
Sexual Abuse
1985-86
35%
18%
17%
677
68
745
626
54
680
329
27
356
July -Dec.
1986
27.8%
22.2%
31.5%
AVERAGE MONTHLY FOSTER CARE CASELOAD
1982-83 Chesterfield
103
Colonial Heights
13.25
-- TOTAL
116.25
1985-86 Chesterfield
77.50
Colonial Heights
4.75
TOTAL
82.25
REDUCTION IN FOSTER CARE CASELOAD - 29.3%
1986-87 (July -December) Chesterfield
92
Colonial Heights
4
TOTAL
96.2
*00
�1rr► ( 5 )
CHESTERFIELD -COLONIAL HEIGHTS
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT
YEAR FEDERAL (75%) TOTAL
Original Allocation $979,731 $1,304,508
1981-82
After federal
reduction 10/1/81
$816,405
$1,087,540
1982-83
$863,823
$1,150,764
1983-84
$891,922
$1,187,428
1984-85
$975,429
$1,300,572
1985-86
$953,262
$1,271,016
1986-87
$984,171
$1,312,228
1986-87 Supplement
12,337
16,450
1986-87 Total
$996,508
$1,328,678
1987-88
$965,011
$1,286,681
TOTAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
1986-87 and 1987-88
— 3.2%
$ 41,997
(6)
CHESTERFIELD -COLONIAL HEIGHTS
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR
TOTAL
LOCAL SHARE
1980-81
$2,178,491
$458,160
1981-82
$2,568,092
$522,209
1982-83
$2,591,620
$492,870
1983-84
$2,472,094,
$514,700
1984-85
$2,721,910
$602,260
1985-86
$2,929,681
$657,200
'1986-87
$3,296,761
$817,950
LOCAL
PERCENTAGE
21%
20.3%
19%
20.8%
22.1%
22.4%
24.8%
1986-87
$323,775
PURCHASE OF SERVICES
1987-88
$326,782
Purchase of Services includes:
Day Care for Children
In -home Services for Elderly
Foster Care for Children
Employment Services Program
Medical and Counseling Services for
abuse/neglect families
Medical and In -home Services for adult
abuse/neglect cases
The funding for these services is insufficient for the current
year with eligibility being restricted for In -home Services, and
no new applications being accepted effective January, 1987. In
addition, Day Care is limited to current recipients.
The agency is faced with a critical situation in Foster Care.
Many children are requiring specialized treatment programs, and
the agency does not have monies to adequately care for them.
Critical Needs
An additional $100,000 in local money is needed to serve children
in residential placements.
DEPARTMENT NEEDS
1. Funding for home -based care for elderly and disabled
2. Day care for recipients in training and employment
3. Social work staff to provide prevention services to families
at risk
4. Eligibility staff to absorb increased applications
5. Administrative support staff
6. Therapeutic group homes for adolescents