Loading...
02-12-1992 Minutes~INUTE~ 1992 Su~_rvisors in Attm~e: Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Vice Chrm. Mr. Edward R. ~arb~r Mr. Whaley M. Colbert Nr. J. L. Mu~ul~, III County A~inis~ator Staff in Attendanoe: M~, Barbara Bennett, Exec. A~st. to Ce. A~in./Dir., office on Youth MS. Marie F. Coone, Chief, Admin. Services for Parks and Recreation Mr. Ri~ard Cordle~ Legis. Svos. and Intergov~rn. Affaire Chief Ro~ L. Fire Department ~r. Bradford D~puty Co. A~n., M~age~e~t Services Dir., Planning Mr. Joh~ Lillard, Dir., Alrport M~. Mary Leu Lyle~ Dir., Accounting Mr. Ho~r~ L. Deputy Co. Admin., Di~,, T=an~portation Dir., Env. County Attorney Dir., News & Public Information services col. J. ~. Pittman, Jr., Police Depar~ent Acting Clerk to ~e Bo~rd of Sup~rvisor~ ~. James J. L. Ste~ai~r, ~. David ~. Dir., utilities ~. Lewis Wendell, Asst. =0 the D~p=ty Co. A~in. ~. Fraderi~ Willis, Jr., Mr. Daniel called th~ regularly schedule~ meeting to order at 3:Oe p.m. (EST}. On notion of N~. ~cHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board suspended ~ts rules to adept %he agenda as presented since it not ~n sequence per the Board's adopted Rules of Procedure. Vote: Unanimous 1. APPROVAL OF HIBu'i'~S 1.A. JANI3A~¥ 22~1992 On motion of M~. Colbert/ seosnded by Mr. MeHale, the Board approved the min~ta~ cf January 22, 1992, as submitted. Vote: Unanimous 1.B, JANUARY 25. 1992 On motion of ~r. Colbert, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board approved the mlnutee cf January 2S, 1992, as submitted. vo~e: Unanimous ldr. Ram~y stated the County had received a Distinguished Budget Preeentation Award f~o~ the Government Finance officers Association of the United States and Canada for its annual budget for fiscal year beqinninq J%tly 1, 1991 and expressed appreciation to ~haff for their efforts in receiving the A~rd, ~e introduced ~r. Dennis Turlington~ Fir~ Marshal, who presented a brief overview of the County's Blood Drive Program and noted the County has been actively involved with the Richmond Met~opoli=an Bloo~ Service in support of blood drives. He stated he felt the success of the Program was contributed ~o the participation of County employees end he expressed appreciation to Mr. Ram~oy for hi~ s~pport and participation in the Blood Drive Program. F~ Warren stated he had attended numerous meetings ov~ the past ~o~th including participation in a celebrity dinner with other members of the ~oard ~t the Lucy Cerr Nursing Home~ · ponsored by the ~ome~'s Club cf Chester, for the benefit of the Loui~u clark ~emoriat Scholarship Fund which oont~bute~ to resident~ of the Nursing ~o~e in taking ¢la~$e~ through John Tyler Community College. Ee noted approximately $6,000 had been ~aised through this effort. ~e £uxth~r ~tat~d he had held hi~ monthly constituents' meeting on February 3, 1992 and the topic for discussion fo~us~ on the ~choal budget and related issues and an overview of the general County budget. ~_r. Colbert stated he and Mr. M~Hale ~ad attended the Crater Planning District Co~isslon meeting. He further Crater had been attempting to attract b~si~es~¢s to the Petersburg area and surrounding counties ~b_~augh advertising an~ noted Mr. MeHale had assisted in coordinating with this advertising promotion. Mr. Mc/~ale stated he had attended the Appomattox ~asin In~ustrlal Corporation m~etlng with Mr- C01b~rt ~s well as the Crater Planning District Commission and had also attended a school Board Liaison cs~ittee Rooting in which the School Mr. Bar,er stated he had hol~ his "Yirst Monday" eo~unity meeting in W~ich the topic had been the Revenue Resour~ Infrastructure Committee report an0 noted Mr. Ramsey and the 92-84 2/12/92 ~irector of Finance for the School ~ystem would be the speakers at hi~ next meetin~ with the topic of discussion being the County and ~chool budgets, ~c noted he had attended numerous other meetings. Mr. Daniel stated he had attended the Capital R~gio~ Airport Commissiom meeting and noted although passenger enplanement had declined, ~argo traffic had increased. He noted the Air~ort was currently in the process of looking for a new Airport director and felt the position would be filled within the nex~c month. He ~urther stated he had attended a Water Re~ource~ Task Force meeting in which the County Administrators and attorneys for each of the localities had been requested to address water r~late~ issges and determine options which WOUld De in the best interest of the region. ~e al~o stated he had an opportunity to visit Harming ~lemen=ary School and indicated he felt the visit wa~ enlightening. He and he had been impressed with the eagerness of the children to learn. ~. R~OO~TS TO PO~'£~ONEACTIO~. E~RG~C~_~DDITIONS O~ On motion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by Mr. McHale, ~ Board added additional info~ation to It~ 7.A., Appoln=ments, Rm~arding ~e Nomination and Ap~olntment of MS. Brenda Johnson Sas=ion~ with another Ex6ou%ive session P~ua~t to Section ~.1-344(~)(7), Code of Virginia, 1950, as ~endod$ for Conaulta=i0n with Legal counsel Ps,raining to the Probabl~ Litigation ~a~ultinq from ZPA SuDer~un~ Claim Against ~esterfield County P~lie Schools und ~ursuant tO $gction ~.1-344(a)(1), Code of virginia, 1950, as ~endad, fo~ Discussion o~ Consideration of Matters Relating to ~ of Specific Appointees of ~e Board and the ~aluation of a $=nlor County official; ~ende~ I~ 6.E.10., Award oi Co~str~etion Con,act for Poco~hock Heights Water Line Rehabilitation; and a~e~ Item 6.E.15., Resolution Re~estin~ the Virginia Depar~ent of Transportation to Install a T~a~sic to follow Item 6.E.14., Acc~pta~¢~ of a Parcel of ~ Alon~ ~rner Road f~om Tr~st~s of Gospel Baptist Chur~ and, adopted the agenda, a~ amended. Vote: Unanimous 5.- WORK 1~. stegmaier presented an overview of projected revenues for flscal y~ar 1993. He reviewed general £und revenue including real estate~ personal property, local sales tax, state f~deral funds and othe~ local revenue; total local, state and federal revenue received from 1988 through ~99~; lo,al revenue including personal propsr=y tax and percent changes, uctual and proje=ted, from fiscal years ~984 through 1993; local sales tax percent ohangem for fiscal years 1984 through 1993; the rate of growth during %he past two yea~s and the percentages of total revenue~ the real estat~ u~sessed value pe~eent Changes, including new construction and revaluations, from fiscal years 1984 through I992; and =ommerciat/indnstrial real estate peranHt Of assessed value £~om 1987 through 1992. He further reviewed pro, coted sourcss of ~ew f~ds for fiscal year 1993 and stated staff was not anticipating any significant change in the total amount of available revenue in the General Fund for fiscal year 1993 as compared to the adopted budqet level of fiscal year 1992. He summarized the projected uses of new funds and stated although there wes not funds. Dimcus~ion, co--eats and qu~stlons ensued relative to the four the tax base versus the one percent increased value on existing property. Mr. Daniel noted the Budget and Audit Committee had presented an overview on projections far revenue for fiscal year 1993 and the forecast was bleDk. ~dr. Ham~er introduced M~. Tim McSarry, Executive Deputy Director for the Richmond Regional Planning Dis~rict Solid Waste Managemen= ~lan -- a regional plan for solid wasps management.' ~e reviewed the purpose and development of the ~lan including msetlng the State planning mandate which ~gui~ the p~eparation of a solid wa=to management plan. He reviewed the input received from the Crater Planning District Co~mission, the Richmond Regional ~lanning D~trict and t~ Central Virginia Waste Management Authority in developing th~ plan and the reco~endation= of the plan. Di$¢~ion, c~ents and questions ensued relative to recyclable ~aterials an~ ~e f~asibility of ~aterial recovery f~cili%ies for landfills. Nr. Daniel stated he felt tho planning process should r~ain with the Richmond Regional Pla~ing District Commimmicn us they have mechanisms already in place to planning pEecesu as wall as the short-t~r~ planning required to serve the Agency a~d ~otad there was e difference in strUcture us compared to the Crater Planning Di~trlct co,lesion. There wa~ brief discussion relative ts t~e necessary funding and staff resourc~ of the Cpntral Virginia Waste ~anagement AuthOrity relate~ to the planning needs of the Central Virginia Waste Management A~thori~y, On motion of ~lr, Mc~ale, seeonde~ by Mr. Warren, ~ha Soard adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS~ the Virginia Waste Management Beard has adopted repulaticna which require every city, ocunty, and town or repien in the Commonwealth of virginia to develop a ~olid waste management plan in accordance with 1~R 672-50-01 an~ that this plan ~emonstratee how the locality er region will neet State mandated r~cy¢ling objectives; and Department of Wast= 'Manugement designated the Richmond Regional Flanning District Commission and Crater Planning Distr~ct C~m~ission as the entities responsible for the development of a regional solid waste management plan for the Central Virginia Waste Management Authority (Clr~MA) service area and designated the CVWMA as the legal entity responsible for i~lementation of th~ plan; and WHEREA~, the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission staff, with assistance from the C~ntral Virginia Waste Management Authority and Crater Planning Di~trlet Commission staffs and input from the Autherity's Technical Advisory Committee and Planning District Commi~sio~r$ Citizen Advisory committee~ has prepared a draft c~ntral virqinia Solid Waste Menegement Plan in accordance wi~h the s72-50-015 and WHEREAS, achieving state mandated recycling objectives and me,ting the solid waste management needs o£ the service area require local government support of and commitment to the implementation oS the central Virginia Solid Waste Management Plan; und WHEREA~, the Board of Supervi~or~ of the County chesterfield adopted a re~olution on June 13, t990, ~ndicating the County of Chesterfleld~ ~upport for the development of a re, ions1 solid waste management plea; and WHEREAS, the Board ef Supervisors of th= County of Chesterfield has considered the d~a£t Central Virginia Solid Waste Managemen~ Plan. NOW~ T~EREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield ~u~Dorte the Central Virginia Solid Waste Management Plan and i~ committed to itg sueeesefuI implementation. A~D, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED~ that the Board of Supervi~or~ of the County of Chesterfield agrees to cooperate with the Central Virginia Waste Naaagement A~th0ri=y, Crater and Richmond Regional Planning District CommOn,ionS and other member governments to maintain, n~date and implement the Plan ado~ted by the Authority. AND, BE IT FURTHER R~SOLV~Q, that the Board supervisors of t/re County of Cheeterfield recognizes that in order for the Plan tO be successfully implemented, each jur~sdicticn has an obl~atio~ to meet %he recycling and other Plan and that integrity of the Plan may require regional coordination of major local ~olid waste management programs through a process to be mutually established ~mong the three participating regional agencies a~d thirteen local Vet~: Unanimous (It is noted a copy of tA~ Region~I Solid Waste Managemen~ Plan is filed with the papers of thi~ Board.) Mr. Daniel recognized Mr. J~h~ Kidd, Executive Director of the Richmond R~gional Plannlng District Commission, who was ~resent. Mr. K~dd ealoressed appreciatien for the opportunity ts addres~ the Board a~ stated he looked forward to Working wi%~ %ho Board in the future. After brief discussion, on motion of Mr. Mo~ele, ~econd~d by Nr, Panini, the Board approve~ the street light i~t~llati0n cost of $2,007 for ~he intersection of W~i%iey court and Whitley street and t~% cost of $1,109 for th~ inter~eotion of che=t~ield Mma~ow~ Driv~ a~d Old Wr~ Road~ with said fund~ to be e~ended from 'the B~a Dis%riot Street Light ~hill=utt Road, in th9 vicinity of the dead mad a~ 451~, with said fund~ to be expehded from th~ Dale D~triOt Btreet Light Account. 2/12/92 A~d, further, the Board dmferred con$i~er~tio~ of ~h~ strcgt light installation cost of $1,6~8 for the intersection of Austin Road and whitley Street, in the Bermuda Magisterial District, until such time as staff can contact the requester to havm thc street light petition meet minimum policy criteria. Unanimous 6.c.1. AIi~PO~ AD~r~SOR¥ BOAR~ Mr. Barber ~o~i~at~d M~. W. C. "Bill" Chandler, reprementing ~idlo~ian Distr~ct, to serve on ~e Airport Advisory Boar~. On motion of ~r. Barber, s~conded by ~. Warr~, the Board nominated Mr. W. C. "Dill" Chandler for appointment to $~e on the Airport ~vi~o~ Bomrd, representing Midlothian District, whose fo~al appoin~en% will ~e made at ~e ~ot~: Unanimous After brief discu~sion~ on motion of M~. Wa~en, seconded ~ ~. Mc~ale, ~e ~oard nominate4 the following person~ in ~e d~si~nated districts to serve on the Airp~ Advisory Board, who=e fo~al ap~oin~ent~ will ~e maOe at the February ~, Na~e DisSrict ~. Richard M. Kin~ Be~uda Mr. Roger Burns Clover Hill Vote: UnaniMous On motion of 1~. Daniel, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board reGcindcd its action on January 2, 1992 appointing Mr. Jack Howe to serve on the' John Tyler Community College Local Board as hi~ term ~ad mot expire~ and the action wam inappropriate and, therefore, reaffirmed his term through December ~1, i999. Vote: Unanimous · .D. $~NDING OF CONTRACT Ig~It. PLANG~uAPH~ ~NC. ~. Ha~er presented a brief overview of the County's Seo~aphic Information System (~IS] Project and stated staff wa~ requesting an ~en~ent to the existing contract PlunGraphics to include ~ditiomal ~ervioes related to the continued implementation of t~e GIS Projeot. ~e reviewed uonvers~on database ~ality control and parcel procedures; suppo~ for defining system testing and support; pilot area conversion an~ quality control ~d defi~i~g facility update ~ooed~es, 5u acknowledged the System ~ Mr. DiOR MoElfis~ and Ms. Nancy ~arker of the ~viro~ental Engineering Depar~en~. He note4 f~ds ~or project have previously ~en approved. 2/12/92 After b~ief discussion, oU motion of M~t. Colbert, second~ by Mr. MoHalk, ~he Board authorized the County Administrator to amount not to exceed $40,000, to provide additional consulting services reluted to the continued implementation of the COunty's Geographic Information syste~ (GIS) P~oJect. · .E.1. DONATrON OF A S~PLI~3 BRUS3/_TR~CK. S~A~ ~ ~ x~ ~T~ ~ F~ D~ On motion of ~r. ~cHale, seconded by ~. Colbert, ~e Board appr~v~ ~e dona%ion o~ a s~lu~ brush =tuck skid unit to the ~guenot Vol~teer Pire Department (Powhata~ Company $2), whi~ unit will also be used Us serve ~= not,west portion of Che~t~field County on mutual aid calls, Vote: Unanimous 6.B.Z. 8~TDATHFOR A P~LIC]{~/M~TO ~X}NSIDER...ARORDINAN~ ~1-67.33.1~ 2X.1-255.4 ~TING On motio~ of Mr. ~cHale, ~econded by ~+ Colbert, ~ Board h~aring to consider an ordinance to ~end ~e CO~ of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, reenacting Sections 21-67.33.1 a~d 21.1-255.4 relating ~an~rally to development standard~ in village districts. Vote: URa~i~ORS 6-E.$. ~OUE~FOR BINGOIRkFFL~PEP~T~ On motion of Mr. McKale, sacon~e~ by ~. Colbert, ~e Board approved a raffle permit for Rocky Mountain Elk Fo~datio~ for calendar y~ar 1992. 0n motion of ~r. McHale, ~oonded by Mr. Colbert, the Bea~d appointed ~s. Theresa M. Pitt~ a~ Interim Clerk to the Board o~ Supe~isors and ~. Joy D. Beavers as Interim Deputy Clerk to the Board of SupervisorE. Votei Unanlmou~ 6.E.5. ADOPTION OF A RE~OLU~ON.,REQUEET/NG AN i~N~iTT TO 0n motion of Mr. MoHalk, ~conded by ~. Colbert, ~e Beard repasted the capital ~ea Training Consortium to amend the capital ~a T~aining Con~ortiu~ ~r~em~nt to permit the Vote: UnanlmoU~ 92-$9 ~/~219~ OF AN ASSIG~a~]~T OF AI~C~OI~T i~ESTAUPa%/~T I~.A~E ENTERPRISES TO KIN~S KDi~9~5~ CA'I'EP~[N~ On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. CoLbert, the Board approved the assignment of. the Airport restaurant lease from Baron Enterprises to ~ing~ ~orn~r Catering, Incorporated. (It is noted a copy of the Lee~e iE f~led with the paper~ of this Board. ) Vote: Unanimous ADOPTION OF A R~SOL~TION .~. ~..VINa. 'r~ RuruNDIN~ OF Jt9.88' ~4D AUT~OP~IZIN~ 'l~ CO~NT~ A~I4INT~T~ATOR TO ~E~ On motion of ~. McHale, seconded Dy Mr. Colbert, the Board adopted ~he ~llowing r~solution and authorized ~e coun=y A~inistratcr to seek approval of ~e refunding from the State Council on Local Debt: CO~TY'S 0~ST~DING WATER ~D SEWER R~ENUE BOND~ · gRR~ ~T~ING ON ~OV~ 1, 1999 T0 2006, ~H I~CLUSIVE, ADMINiST~TOR ~D OTHER C0~TY OFFICIALS T0 SE~E THE APPROV~ OF ~E STATE CO~CIL ON LO~ DEBT WITH RESPE~ TO THE ISSU~CE OF "~F~DI~G ~0NbS" ~O~ ~UCH m~OS~ ~U~T SECTION 15.1-227.46 OF TH~ COD~ OF VIRGINIA, 1950, ~O THE "GUID~IN~S ~R AP~OV~ OF RE~DING ~O~S ~Y THE STATE CO~CIL ON LO~ DEBT" ~PTED BY ~E STATE CO~CIL ON LOCAL DEBT ~ER~DZR ~est=rfield, Virginia, has dete~ined that it would deeirable to refund ~n a~van=~ of ~ir &tat~d maturities s~e~ 1988, maturing on Nove~er 1, 1999 to 2006~ both incluEivo, and o~ ~ov~c 1, Z01O (col!eo~ively, ~e Bonds")~ for the purpose of realizing d~t ~e~ic~ cost Co~nci~") of ~e i~suanu~ .of the reSunding bun~= for 15.1-227.46 of the Code of Virginia, 1~50; S~pervi~orz of the County of ~e~terfield, Virgi~, ~011ows: SECTION 1. Apprgval of Rafundin~ of 1988 Bonds. Th~ Board hereby authorizes the refundin~ of ~e 19~ Bonds. SECTION 2.' state Council on Loc~l Debt Approval. The County are hereb~ authorized and directed to pre=ent a plan of refunding with re~ct to ~m 1988 Bends %0 ~he Stare Council and to seek the approval of ~ State Council of th~ i~uance oS r~fun~ing bond~ D~ua~t to Seotion 15.1-227.46 of the Code of Virginia, 195~, an4 the "c~idelin~s for Approval of Refunding Bonds ~ ~e State Co~c~l on Local Debt" adopted by CO~ty is her~y authorized to pay any fees and 'expenses of the ~tate CO~¢i~ in connection therewith. 92-90 2/12/92 shall take affect upon its adoption. vote: Unanimous · h~ day th~ county ~nvironmen~al ~ngiueer, in aoeor~ance wit~ directions from th~s Board, ~de ~po~t in ~i~ing upon ~i~ Park Terrace a~d Meadow Park Circle in Meadow Park, Clover Hill District. seconded by ~. Colbert, it is resolved that Meadow Circle in Meadow ~ark, Clover Kill Dim~ict, b~ aB~ hereby are established as public roads. And be it further re~olved, ~at the Virginia Department of Transpo~ation, be and it hereby is me~emted =o take into geconda~ Sy~te~ Meadow Fa~ Drive, beginning at the inters~Gtlon with El~ardt Road, Stat~ Route 663, and going ~o~theTly 0.17 ~ile to end in a cul-de-sac; Meadow Park Drive, beginning at the intersestion with =l~ardt Road, state Route 663, a~d going southerly Q.03 mile, th~n turning and going sou~erly 0.04 mile to the inters~=tion with Meadow Park Tek,ace, then continuing southerly 0.08 mile to end in ~l-de-~ac; Meadow ~ark T~rrac~, beginning at ~he intersection with Meadow Park Driv~ and going southeasterly 0.0~ ~ile southeasterly 0.03 mile to end in a dead end; and M~ad~W Park circle, beginning at the ]nner~ection with Meadow Park Tek,ace and going southerly 0.06 mile to end in a ~is re,est is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Dep~tm~nt of ~d be it f~ther ro~otved, that the 8oar~ ~f su~ervimor~ ~arante~s to th~ Virginia Depar~ent of T~a~sportmtion an unrestricted right-of-way of 40' wi~ nece=s~ ~a~ents for ~ut~ f~l]~ and drainage for all of t~a~e roads. D~ed Book ~889, Page 1B66, August ~, 1992. 6.E.9. AG~E~T FOR~%X)F~RNAN(~oF A~TO~TWA~D~AINAGE 0n motion of ~. McKale, seconded by ~. Colbert, the Board authorized the Co~%y A~ini~trator to execute a stoma=er Drai~ge Systen and Be~t Management Practise Facility A~eem~nt with th~ o~er of Soutkshore, Section A, wi~h ~e Co~ty'~ only i~volvement being to assure the ~int~nanoe A~eement is followed by the owner a~ approved by the County Attorney. 9~-91 approved appropriations of $21,357 f~om contributions from developers an~ awarded a construction con~ract to Lyttle Ut~lltles, the low bidder, in the amount of $92,668.50, for Po~oshock Heights Water Line Rehabilitation, Project $91-0039, and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary ~ecuments. (~t is noted remaining funde are available i~ the Capital Improvement Budget.) Vote: Unanimous After brief discs{sion, on notion of ~r. ~c~ale, ~econded by Mr. cel~er=, the Board approved a utilities contract for Ironbridge Plaza, Pha~o I, ~roj~ct Number $$-Q~77, a~ f011ews, whie~ project includes the exg~ensien of 3,860 L.F. ~ of wa~tewa~er lin~; 6,9~4 L.F. + of water linee of which 3~57s L.F. ~ of ~6 inch wete~ lines is oversized and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documant~: Developer: Wal-Mart Stsre~, Inc. cont~acte~ COpes construction Company Contract A~sunt: . E~ti~ated Total $319~301.1Z Total Eati~ated County Co~t: Water (OYer~izing) $ 47,885.07 (Refund t~uruconneotionn) Estimated Developer Cost: $27~416.05 Code: (Oversizing) ~-~0-~907~2E Vote: t~nanimo~s 6.E.13. A~EPTAN~OF A PARC]~L_OF..~%ND~J~I~G On ~o%ion of ~. MoHalk, seconded by ~. Colbert, th~ Board aOO~p=~d, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a parc~l of land containing 0.079 acre along 3offorson Davis ~ighway and Willi~ R~a~, from 'T~e Sou~land ~o~oration, A Texa~ Co~oration, and ~uthorized the Co~ty Administrator Vote: Unanimou~ ~U~'~OF~~I~ On ~tion of ~. ~c~al~, seconded 'by ~. col~er~ ~he Board m==ep=ed~ on ~half of the county, t~ o0~veyance of a purc=l of land containing 0.069 acre along T~rnmr Road, fr~ of Gospel Baptis~ ~ch, and 'a~t~o~izud the Co~ty A~inlstrator to ~xe~te th~ n~cess~ ~ee~. (Ia is note~ a copy of =he Plat is fi~ed~wi~ the pa~e~s of this Bourd.} ~-~-~- ~E~O~IFEIONI~EOUEST~NG~ ¥~GINIADNP&Rq~F~OF TIA%NSI~ORTATION TO TN~TA/~ ~FIC SIGNA~AT ~ After brief di~cusslen, on motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr- Colbert, the Beard adopted the following remolUtiO~; 92-92 ~/1~/9~ W~REAS, 4~he Cen~ralia Read/Chester Roa~ inter,action is unsafe; and WHSREAS, citizens hays apDsared before the Board of S~pervi~or~ to request a traffic signal a% the intersection; and WBEREASz in 1986, the Board of supervisors adopted a resolution requesting the virginia Department Of Transportation (~DOT) to install a signa~ ak the intersection; and WIqEREAS~ in 1957~ VDOT advised the County that a signal was warranted at the int~r~eotie~; and W~ERF2%~, the improvement of the cen~ralia Road/Chester Road int~sectien, including the installation of a traffic sigaal with turn lanes on Centralia Read and Chester Road, included in the County's priority list for highway prejects. NOW, TKERBFORE BE IT R~SOLV~D, that th~ Chesterfield Board Of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to in.tall a traffic ~ignal a~d turn lanes at tile centralia Road/cBester Road inters=etlon. AND, BE IT ~URTHER RESOLVED, that the Board requests ~rDOT to pro~d with these i~provements Vote: 6.E.12. CONSENT FOR C~Nv~AN.CE OF AN ~A~NT TO C & ~ T~m~HOI~E (X~ANY BE ~ILI~ ~0RRIS~. ~C. ~ITflIN A PREVIOUSLY ~RANT~D COUNTY FAS~fl~T Mr. Duniel disclosed to the Board that he i~ employed by Philip Morris, Inc., declared a 9etential eonfliot of interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act, and excused hlmssl~ from =ha meeting. approved Phillp ~orri=, Inc. granting an in.ess and ea~ent to C & P Telephone Company within a Count~ and e~es~ ea~ent acquired for ~e Be~uda H~d~ed P~p Station, Which re. est is necessa~ to provide acce~ to th~ C & ~ ~a~ent granted by the County rom oritlcally nee~e~ authorized the County Administrator %~ ~mcute ~e agreement. (It is noted a copy ~f th~ Plat is filed with pa~rs of this Ayes: Mr. Warren, ~. ~arber, ~. Colbert an~ Mr. McHale. Absent: ~. Dan~et. ~. Daniel ret~ned t0 t~e meeting. CAPITAL ~ TRAINING CONSORTI[3}{ After brief disousslon~ ~e Board generully agreed to defer nominationE to ~h$ Capital Area ~aini~ Consorti~ ~t~l such time as th~ bylaws of the Consortium are umend~d. suspended its rules to allow simultaneous nomination/ app0i~t~ent at this time of the remainder cf the following committee apDnintments. simultaneously nominated/appointed ~drs. Tra~y ~illlamson to District, whose term is effective immediately and will be at On mo~on o~ M~. ~arber, ;e~o~d by Hr, ~arren, the ~ea~d deferred consideration of nominations to the Solid Waste Committee, representing clover Hill and Midlothian Distriots, until February 26, 1~92. Vote: Unanimous . TR~NSIK~RTATLQK. S~mzl Mr. Colbert nominated Me. Debb~e Bradbury, representing the County at-large~ to serve on the Transportation Safety Committee. O~ ~otion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by Mr. M~ale, the Board ~imultaneou~ly ~omi~ate~/appoint~d ~s. D~bbie Bradbu~ to se~e on ~e Transportation ~af~ty Co~itte~ represen%in~ ~e County at-larg~, who~e tern is mffective i~e~iately and will Vote: Unanimous APPEAI~ P~r~LI~]~S~J/~I~GINIAS~ On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board simultaneously n~inated/re~ppuinted ~ir. Janes E. Harris and Mr. Samuel H. We~t. to ~erve on ~e Appeals Panel Pursuant to ~irginla Set Off De~t Collection Act, representing ~m ~ounty at-18rge~ who~e term~ are effective i~ediately and will be at Vote: Unanimous $ehn~on had been appointed to t~e community Services ~oard, r~pre~e~ti~g Clover Hill .District, whose term was' designated tl~rough December 31, 1992. He clarified since ~hst t~e, it had been determined the appointment needed to be for a full After brief discussion, on motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by t/%e Community servioes Board, representin~ Clover Hill to l~gal requirements %/tat the appointment n~e~ed to be for ~ B~SI~ESS LI~SE TAX~$ ~. Micas stated ~is it~ had b~n deferred from ~e Board ~eet~g on February 12, 1992 at the request of the representative for the veterinarians and %hey were again ~e~esting a deferral of ~i~ request ~/il February 26, 1992. ~. Bar~r made a motion %o defer a re,est by concerned taxes until ~ebruary 26; 199~. ~. Daniel stated the Boar~ would bu h~arlng zoning requests at its meetinq on February ~6, 1999 a~d, therefore, he felt the request ~houl~ ~ deferred ~=il ~ir next regularly schedul=d me%ting on Murch 11, 199l. ~. Bar~r windrow hi~ On mo%ion of Mr. Barber~ seconded by Mr. Warren, th~ Board defe~ed a re,est by concerned veterlnariann regarding th~ citizens on Unscheduled Matters or Claims, until ~arch 11, 1992 at 7:00 p.m. Vote: Unanimous ~r. Ram~ey presented the Board with a s~atus report on the General Fund Balance; Reserve for Future Capital Projects; District Road and Strset Light Funds; Lease Purchases; and School Boa~d Agenda. Mr. Ramsey presented the 8card with a report on the developer Administrator. 9. ~t~'lv~ SESSION On ma~ion a~ Mr. McKale, seconded by M~. Colbert, the Board went into Executive Session, pursuant to Section 2.1-344(a)[7)¢ Code of Virginia, 19~0, as 'amended, fo~ consultation with lggal counsel pertaining to probable litigation resulting from an EPA Superfund Claim against Cheeter£ield County Publlc Schools and pureuant to Section 2.1-344 (a)(1), Code of Virginia, ~950, as a~ended, for ~is=ussion or consideration of ~att=rs relating to the amsigrL~ent, appointment, performance, ~oval 'or resignatio~ of specific appoint~ 0f the ~oard and thm ~valuatt:n of a ~nior County official. Vot~: Unanimoum Reoonvening: on notion of Mr. NcHal~, ~¢ouded by Mr. Colbert, 9_he Board u~cpte~ ~he following reso]ufien: · ~E~EAS~ the Board Of suDervi~sr~ ha~ t/tis day adjourned into ~xec~tive Session in accordance wi~h a for~al vote of the Board, and in accordance with the pruvision~ of the Virginia 92-95 2/1~/92 WH~AS, the Virginia Freedom o2 In£orma~ion Ac~ effective July 1, 1989, prov~dem for certification that such Exeoutive Session was oondusted in conformity with law. NOW, TBEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of County Sup~rvi~or~ dOeS hereby certify that ts the best of each member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under =he Freedom of Infor~atio~ Act were discussed in the E~eutiv~ Sa~ion to whi=h this certification applies, and ii) only such public business matters as ware identified in the Motion by which the E~ecutive Session was convened were heard, discussed or =onsidered by the Board. No member dissents from this certification. The Board being peli~d, the vote was as follows: Mr. McHale: Aye. Mr. Barbe~: Aye. Mr. Co,bert: Mr. Warren: Aye. Mr. Daniel: 10. D INN]~ · ~ne Board race~sed at 6~00 p.m. (~ST) to ~%t Nith representatives e~ T. he Metropolitan Riohmon~ Convention and Visitors Bureau for a~ i~f~r~al dinner and meeting ~n the Ad_ministration Building, Room 50~. Reeenvening: 11. ~]T~OCATION Mr. Daniel introduced Reverend L. Deugla~ Hill, Pasta~ Of Beulah Unltod Methodi~ Church, who gave the i~vocation. 1~, ~LEDG~ OF ~T.?.~CE ~ Tm~ ~G..OF 'rn~ ~ STA~ OF 14r. Masden led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United states of A~erica. ~r. ~ammor in~a~uaed Mr. John ~azza~ Jr. and M~. Philip ~vans and stated the Board would be recognizing .them for their service ~c the Airport A~vi~ory Board with certifisates of Appreciation. 13.&.~_. ],I2R. JO]{N ]~%~ZA. 3'R. ]4r. Danlel e~pro~god appreoiation to ~Ir. Mezzo ior his one year of oonttnuing service and support on thc Air~ort Advisory Board and prmg~nt~d him with a certificate oS Appreciation. 2/12/92 Certificate of Appreciation a= a later da~n recognizing his 13.A.3. MR. I:,F'n'.Tp EVAB't: N~. Daniel expressed appreciation to Br. Evans for his on ~he Airport Advisory Board and presen=ed hi~ with a Certificate of Appreciation. 13.B. COI~IUNI'I'Y .qERVI~'F~ BOARD Nm. ~asden introduced Mr. Charles E. Jackson and Dr. ~anfor~ Schwartz and stated the Board would be recogrlizlng them for their service to the Conununity Service~ Board with Pewter Mr. Daniel expressed appreciation tc Mr. Jackson for his =hree years o~ service, re~e~enting Bermuda District, on the Cemmunity Services Board and presented him with a Pewter Plate. DR. ,l~tlt'leOllD SD~L~Z Mr. Daniel expressed appreciation to Dr. Sehwart~ for his three years of service, r~prasenting Midlothian District, on t~e Co~/~ni~y $ar¥ice~ Board and presented him with a Pewter Plat~. Nm. Daniel ~tat~ since Captain Bradley was not preeent to a~cept this recognltlon~ the Board would recognize hi~ at a later meeting for his service to the Crater Planning District commission. 13.D. ~I(~ONDI~E~IONALPL/~gNINGDZWTRICTCOMNISSION La~ence R. Belcher and them for their ~rvlce to the Richmond Repional Pla~ing Ric~on~ Reqional Planning Di~tri¢t Cotillion and pres~ted him with a 13.D.2. ~R. LAIi'RENCR R. BEi.~ttF.~ Mr. Daniel expressed appreciation to Mt'. Belcher for his eight years of serviGo, represen=in~ the County at-large~ on the Richmond Regional Planning District Com~i~ie~ and presented him with a P~wter Plate. 92-97 2/12/92 ~I.E...~ERFIELD~OIINTYPLANN1NG .C~ISSION Mr. K~r i~troduced Mr. La~ence R. Belcher, ~. J. ~. 8teven Perkins and ~. A~th~ S. Wa~en und stated the Board woul~ b~ recognizing th~m for their service to ~e C~esterfield county Pla~ing co~s~ion with ~e~er Plates. ~r. Daniel ~r~s~d appreciation to ~. ~lch~r ~or hi8 twenty years of servic~ representing Matoaca D~t~ict~ on the ~e~terfield County Pla~ing Co~l~ion and presented him wi~ a P~er Pla=e. Mr. Danlel expro~mod appre¢iatiou to l~r. Perkins for his four years of service~ representing Bermuda District, on the Chesterfield County Planning Commission and presented hi~ with a Pew~e~ Plate. ~r. Daniel ~tated Ms. Bsisineau would be presented w~th a Pewter Plate at a later date recognizinq h~r ~rvice to the chesterfield County Plannin~ Commission. Mr. Daniel expressed appreciation to F~r. Warren fur his four years of seTvloe, representing Clover Hill D~tr~ct, on the Chesterfield County Planning Co~a~i~ien and presented him wi=h a Pewte~ Plate. Mr. Daniel stated the Beard had appointed the Revenu~ capital faciliti&s and to make recommlendatlons tot-he Board. stated the Committee had reported to the Board in January and ~_he County Administrator had ~een ~nst1'ucted to implement certain recommendations which had been made by the Co~mittee. Co~ttee wa~ appointed by the Board of Supervisors January, 19~0; and capital budget Sinanclal needs of chesterfield County; and Comittee reviewed the co~ty~s current flnmnclal ~tatu= and infra~tructu=e n~ed~, ~atherin~ citizen input, 0ompleting a report and m~ing reco~endation~ to ~e Board.of ~ER~S, ~. E. C. ~Gene" A~try demons~ted 'lead~sh~p, Infrastructure co~ittee w~ile serving in ~e - capacity 92-9~ 2/12/92 Committee represented a crcse-~ectlon of the community repr~entlng each magisterial dlstri~t, the Chesterfield Business Council, tile financial industry, the ~omebuildera Aesociation of Ri=hmond, the League of Women voters, neighborhood o~gani~ations, the induetr~nI and manufacturing industry and public school oonsumer~; and Committee met twice monthly beginning in Pebruary~ 199I and worked over one thousand ~a~-hour~ reviewing expenditures~ operating budget reductions, reve~e enhancements and ~aetions an~ oapi~aI budget financial polisiee. County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its gratitude tu Mr. E. C. "Gene" Autry for serving as Chairman and the ~ollowing member~ of the Revenue Resources and Infrastructure Cs~m~ittee: NS. Eileen Amesbury; Mr. Willi~ p. Blackwood; Reverend Harold Z. Braxton; Mr. William L. Gregg; Mr. C, T. Hill; Mr. Rudolph F. Janis, Jr.; Ms. Kathleen C. Kondyla~; Hr. Robert J. Leipertz, Jr.; Mr. c~arles R. Quaiff; Oliver D. Rudy, E~quire; Mr. Daniel K. Smith; and Mr. Jame~ D. Wright, Mr. Daniel pre~ented the executed resoletion to F~r. Autry, ac=ompanied by hi~ wife, and ex, reseed appreciation ~o him for the Co~ittee'~ untiring efforts and noted similar re~elutions would be eent to each member of tho Committee. Mr. Autry thanked the Board for the recognition and ~tated he hoped the Board would explore tho recommendations made by the Committee. Chief Eamea introduced ~r. Richard Weakl~y and his wife and recognizmd ~he Ruri~ans from ~iffer~t ~t~ of ~e State who were present. On motion of the Board, the following re=olut~on ~a~ adopted= ~ER~S, ~. Richard Weakley i~ now ~ing as for twelve years, he was a cha~r m~ber of ~e Westover Club of South Ri~ond; se~ed as the Club~ PTesident, vice num~er of co~te~; a~d a~ a member of the Do~ing Club Chesterfield County was ~esignate~ a~ a Ruritan"; and WHER~S, d~ing t~iu tim=, he also se~sd at the level of the R~itan organization a~ Govmrnor, ~ov~rnor, E~unsion Chai~an, ~imtrict Convention Chai~an and Zone Governor~ an~ ~R~S, Mr. Weakley also =erred a~ ~e national l~wel of the Organization as a National Board Me,er, Ch=irman of the Resolution Co~ttme, Chai~an of ~e Resolutions and Bylaw~ co~itte~, Workshop Coord~nator, Board Parliamentarian, Board ~haplain~ Board Piotorlal Historian~ Chairman of the Fellowship an~ R~o~ption Co~ittee and District Club Officer Training Inst~o=or; and ~ER~S, ~. Weakley ~ed t~i~ty-fo~r years with the Richmond School System as T~a~her, Principal and Supe~isor of 2/1~/9~ WHEREAS, ~r. Weakley, us a member of the Ben Air Methodist Chur0h and Lay Leader, has served on the Board of Btewards, Chairman ef the Council of Ministries, Chairman of the Ushering Team, the Mu~is committee, and taught the C~ristian Home Sunday School Clann; and WHEREAS, he and his wife clara, have acted as adult coun~elerm at Ca~ Virginia, a summer camp for boys~ for the .past ~hlrty-nix years; and W~EREAS, Mr. Weakley earned bin B.S. Degree ~n Education from Su~es /~adison University; his M.S. Degree from the University of virginia; and holds professional memberships in the National ~ducation Association, the Virginia Education Assoeia=ion and tho National Principals' Association; and WHEP~EAS, through Mr. Weakley'n untiring efforts, the R%trltan Organization will experience the largest single year's growth in the lent two decades. NOW, THERE~OF~E BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board O~ Supervisors publicly recognizes and expresses its gratitude and sincere appreciation to Mr. Richard Weakley for his extraordinary oommitment to ~ommunity service and his inordinate success in encouraging other~ to do their be~t, AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be appropriately prepared and presented to National R%trltan ~resident, F~r. Richard Weakley. vote: Unanimous ~r. Daniel presented the exscuted resolution to Mr. Weakley, accompanied by his wife~ and e~prenned app~ec~ation for his commitment to community ~erviu=. Chief Eanes expressed appreciation to the Ruritan Clubs within th~ ColL~ty who have dona%ed smoke detectors to disadvantaged families. MX. Waakley expressed appres~atlon to the Board for ~he r~cogmition and to the Appomattox Di=trlct and Rurltan Club~ within the Coun=y for nneir contributions to the community. On motion of the Board~ th~ following r~olutlcn was adopted: W~R~A~, th~ Boy Sco~ts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and citizenship training, personal development and fi=ness of individuals; and in a wide variety of ,fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in t~e troop, demonstrating Scout ~pi~it and livi~ up to the Scout Oath and Law; and W?LEREAS, Mr. ~drew Christian Austin, Wo~lake united St~nd~rds of co~i~ent and has reached the long-=ought goal of ~agle Scout whi~ is reseived Dy less =hap two perc~t of those individuals entering the ~coutlng mov~meRt; and learning the l~ssunm of re~pon~ble citizenship and priding himself on the gr~a% accomplishments of his County, ~rew is 92-100 2/12/92 NOW~ THE~%EFORE BE IT RB$OLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisor~ hereby extend~ its congratulations to Mr. Andrew Christian Austin and acknowledges the good fortune ef the County bo have such an out~tanding young man as Vets: Qnanimous ~4~. Celbert pre~e~ted the exeouted r~eoluticn to Mr. Austin, accompanied by member~ of hi~ family, and congratulated him on his outstanding achievement. There were no hearings scheduled fur citizens co unscheduled matters or claims. a public h~arlng to consider ~en~ent$ to ~e Midlo~ian ~ea Co,unity Plan and the Thoroughfare Plan~ elements of Chesterfield County Compreh~$iw~ ~lan. He stated s~as~ th~ Planning co~ission reco~ended denial of the 9reposed expansion of the designate~ Village Area to inco~oraUe ~o~don D~ve/~a~nett Lane neighborhood. He noted a letter had been z~c~iw~d from ~e LeGor~on Drtve/Garnett Lane neighborhood a~reei~g to the reco~endatlon. ~. McCracken presented a brief overview of the ~oroughfare Plan relative to r~allgn~ W~nterfi~ld Road proposal stated staff reco~endea modlf~cat~on of the Thoroughfare Plan to ~ange the currently adopted seventy foot collector ~oud proDosal from Alig~ent B to Alig~nt C providing a~e~ate bu~e~ alon~ ~ealig~ed Winterfield Road a~ 'it li~s Ro~te 60. He noted ~taff re~o~ended approval of There was brief disuussion relative to realized Winterfield LeGor~on Drive. MS. Elain~ Beard, representin~ the ~Go~don Drive/Garnett traffic in her ~eig~o~ood und ~e possibility of accidents; the safety o~ ~e chil~en in the n~ighborhood~ traffic capacity of the roads in the vicinity; and, ~erefor$, ~. George ~eadles stated he felt e~tabli~h~d oompr~ensive plans should be followed within the County and re~sted M~. Pa~li~ Bonaparte stated she was concurned about prop~Tty looatsd on W~stfield Drive an~ the incruas= traffic and~ ~erefore, re~ustad the Board to deny adjacent., property o~e~ and had reviewed the original proposal; that~he was concerned as to the increase in traffic; 2/12/92 that he felt the new road would destroy one of the oldest villages within the County; that ha felt Alignmen~ C would be adequate and, therefore, requested ~he Board ~o approve the Ms. C~olyn Powers, Presidsnt of Midlothian District Community Action kant1, reviewed the connection from Winterfield Road to Route 60 and the COnnection from Route 60 to Charter Colony Parkway and stated she felt Ms. Beard had lsgitimate concerns; that the road between Charter Colony Parkway and LsGordon Drive had originally been intended to be temporary; and requested the Board to consider ~he concerns of both of the neighborhoods involved. MS. Beard clarified the LeGordon Drive~Gannett Lane neighborhood had not been included in the development of the Midlothian Village Plan a~ they were on the perimeter of the ~idlcthlan village and requested the Board ~c ~e£er t~e request to allow am opportunity for the Board to visit the site. high speed of traffic using Winterfield and Westfield Roads and indicated she ~elt the Boa~d should visit t~e Site. T~ere being no cna else to address this issue, the public ~r. Barber stated he had visited the location and felt everyone wa~ in agreement that Winterfield Road problems address the future of LeGordon Road. There was brief discussion relative to the number of traffic accidents on Winterf±eld Road. received by the County, as indicated by the number of =itlzsn process had been oonduotsd appropriately. After brief discamslon, on motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warrsn, the Board adopted the proposed amendments to the Midlothian Area Community Plan an~ the Thoroughfare Plan relatlve to realigned Winterfield Road (Alignment C) and to change the currently adopted seventy foot, collector road proposal fremAlignment B to Alignment C, providing adequate buffers along realigned wintsrfield Road as it li~](s with expansion oX the de~ignaued village ~roa to ~noorporate the WAT~ ~ ~ 'r~ ~ ~ ~ ~Y ~ION u p~l~c hearing to con~der C~mpr~hensive Pi~ by adding a plan for p~otect~ng the future ~ality of water re~our~eS in ~ County. ~e reviewed the proposed wate~ Quality Protection Plan which would provide a efforts throughout the County. 92-102 2/12/92 There was brief discussion relative to the recent action taken by the Board to refer to the Planning com~iszion, for a written assessment and recommendation, to identify needed information, ~tudies and resoUrces required iD order to develop three reservoir water quality strategies -- one each for Swift Creek Reservoir, Lake Chesdin and Falling Creek Reservoir. Dr. Betty Hunter-Clapp~ representative of Hands Across the Lake, stated 'they were concerned as to the water quality and quantity of the County; that the a~endment would enforce the Countytm co~itment to protect its resources; that there were many issues addressing water and it~ use; and federal amd State legislati0n would eventually impose wate~ pre~eetion on localities; that standards by the Environmental Protection Agency would assist in others cooperating; that ~hny felt the County should b. vimionary and a leader in attempting to address the~e qu~deline~; that resources such as air~ water and land purity standards should be proSected; that the proposed standards should refleot the need for enforcement sanctfon~ a~ adequate monitoring and enforcement wit~ the appropriate ~enaltie~ could am~ist with the cost of watermhed management, eta, She reviewe~ their proposed changes to the amendment and requested the Board to modify the amendment am Mr. Phil Hals=y, representing Citizens £or Responsible Government, ~ubmitted to the Board a letter ~equesting the Board to r~and the proposed amendment to the Planning Commission for their review and reco~endation and outline~ their conuerns as expressed in the letter~ that he felt qove~nme~t often initiutes new programs to solve problems without i~enti£ying the source cf the problem and that he also felt an ordinance regarding the use of fertilizers should be e~tablished wi=him the county. ~r. Alan ramadan, Director of th~ Weodlake co~unity Association, ~tated they s~pport the proposed amendment inuluding the additlonm offnr~d by Hands Across the Lake; t~at they felt the goals and pollcles of the amendment~ translated into an action program that would protect the County's Water resources; that they they felt certain elements sh0~ld be conmidnrnd ~Oh as the quality of water being determined, =tandards to ~t t3~e desired water quality, a teehnlcal aaund ~onitoring program to measure progress or 'reg-~es~ion, a means of control for enforcement and, if necessary, presentations and a so~rce of financing. ~e noted they would be willing to work with County authorities to develop ~uoh a program. Ms. Carolyn Powers, Coordinator of the Chesterfield Citizens for the Environment, ~tated due to the recent action by the Board to develop water quality strategies for swift creek Reservoir~ L~ke Chesdin and Falling Creek Reservoir, they felt additional modiZications e~ould be made to the proposed a~end~e~t ~d s~e reviewed these oh~ges. and the recent action by the Board to develoD water quality strategies for Swift Creek Re~eryeir, Lake Chesdin and Falling referring the amendment ts the Planning Co~u~isslon for their review and recommendation. was deferred, it woul~ provide an oDpertnnity for staff to the wording of the amendment an~ autiined his concerns as to the process which would follow the adoption of the amendment. He indicate~ he fe~t due to tho time' restrictions ~egarding th~ Chesapeake 'Bay Preserwation Ordinance, the Board should adopt the proposed amendment and modify it at a later date. 2/12/92 There being no one else to address this issue, the public hearing was closed. Dieo~sion, com~=ntu and question~ ensued relative to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance in relation to the proposed amendment and whether the proposed amendment ~hould be deferred or remanded to the Planning CoI~issinn. Mr. Colbert made a motion to remand to the Planning CO~ission, for their restructuring, an amendment ts the Connty"s Comprehensive Plan by adding a plan for protecting the future quality of water resources in the County and for staff to bring the necessary item to the Board within sixty days. F~r. Barber seconded the motion. Mr. Barber inquired as to the feaslbili~y of the Planning Commission holding a public hearing and preparing a recommendation fo= the Board within the sixty day timeframe. Mr. Jaoobson stated he felt a ninety day deferral would be more feasible. Mr. Colbert amended his motion, seoonded by 1~. Ba~her, to remand to the Planning Commission, for a publlc hearing and recommendation, an amendment to t~e County's Comprehensive Plan by adding a plan for protecting th~ futur~ quality of water resources in the County and for the reoo~endation to be brought back to the Board of $~pervt~o~ b~ May 1~, 1992. Mr- Warren stated he felt the Board should clari£y their direction to the Planning Commission that the intent of ~he Board, wes for the amendment to be clarified, improved and defined in order to ~tr~ngthen th~ ~equi~nt~ of p~oteetion Mr. McHale stated he supported ~he document but he felt the colbert, sesonded by Mr. Barber, to remand to the Planning a~end~ent to the County's Comprehensive Plan by adding a plan for protecting the future qumllty of water r~mouro$~ i~ the of Superviso~ by May 13, ~992. ~N~SSIONS BY A~IC ~IA~ONS Mr. M~d~n ~tated this date and ~ime had been advertised ~blic hearing to consid~ the conv~yanc~ of leases of real ~rop~y in ~e Ches~field Parks Syste~ f0~ operation of ~. Don ~ic, 'President of Chs~t~rfield Baseball Club~, Inc., Iro~idge Parks; that he has not seen ~e lea=e; that he had concerns regar~ing ~he ~roce== of the approval of ~e leases, and, ~erefore, requested the consideration to CO~V~y the provide him sufficient time to receive mud review the Mr. Shaman Litton stated he wa~ a~tively i~vQ1ve~ wi~h ~e~erfiel~ Baseball cl~s, Inc. and ~l~ough they wanted Ironbridge Pa~s, h~ felt they needed an opportunity to review the lease~. 92-10~ 2/12/92 When asked, Mr.. Masden indimeted some of the ourr~nt l~a~e hoIdar~ had not baa an opporhunity to review the proposed Hr. Daniel stated he fel~ staff should notify each of the curren% lease holders and provide an opportunity for each to review the proposed leases. There was brief di~c~a$ion relative to whether a representative for each leas~ holder ~hould be present to accept the terms of the l~ase and the appropriate process which zhould be followed in ~otifying the current lease ho!d~rs. On motion of Mr. Warren, ~e¢onde~ by F~r. colbert, ~/]e Board deferred u public hearing to consider the conveyance o~ leases o= real property in t_he Chesterfield Parks System for operation of food concessiun~ by athletic associationa at the following sites until March 11, I~2 at 7:00 p.m.: R~all~r~erty {Fac~l.~_t~em) Bensley Community Building Chalkley Athletic Complex Reokwood Parr Bir~ Athletic Complex Point e~ Rocks Zttrick Par~ Robicus Athletic complex M~toaca Park Iron Bridge Park Goyne Park Vote: Unanimous ~er~t Leuse Holder Bentley Athletic Aszociaticn C~alkley Athletic A~ociation Chesterfield Baseball Clubs, Inc. chesterfield Girls Softball Ettrlck Youth Sports Association Harrowgate Athletic A~sooiation H~g%~e~ot Little League Matoaca Athletic Association Chesterfield Baseball Clubs, Inc. Chester Sports Boo,tens · 5.~. TO CONSIDER 'r.~u~ HOUSING A~FOI~DABIr-VTy_STRATEG¥ Mr. ~wis W~ndell, Assistant to th~ D~p~y County A~inis~a%or for Co~uni~ Develo~ent, ~tated thi~ ~ate an~ Comprehensive ~ouslng Affordability prem~n~eo a Drier ov~iew of the C~S including its co~uni~ profile, market and inventory conditions, i~s ~iv~ year ~trateq, available ~o~ces and impI~tation and noted ~re would be u sixty day p~blic co~ent 9erred roll,lng ~is public hearing and noted all cements would Oep~rtment of Housing and Urban Development (~) for their review. Mr. Sterling Hawkins, V~e Pr~iden= of Ettriok on the Move~ a co~ity organization, =tared they ~uppOrt th~ C~S as it would provide .a sourc~ Village Plan; that the Ettrick Village Plan was cited as a priority in ~ c~s; that they felt the revitalization of ~ttrick should be ad~essed; that there was a stronq n~ed for Code enforcement in Ettrick~ and that they f~lt they could imDr0ve the perception of the Village of Ett~ick au well aa its quality cf life with the fun4ing from CHA~. Mr. George Beadles stated he felt a housing rehabilitation program should net bm developed County-wide but rather only in certain a=eas and Chat he was opposed to a housing code enfe~ce~eut program as he felt this should fall under the guidelines of the Zoning Ordinance. There being no one else to address thim ~ssue, the public It was noted ne action by ~ha board of Supervisor~ was required at thio time as t~e COmprehensive Housing Affordahility Strategy (C~LKS) Am require4 to go threRgh a public ~earing process allowinq for a si~ty day public tom, merit period befere submitting the ~ocumant and compiled public eo~t~ent to the U. 8. Dep~rtment of Housing and Urban Develogment (~UD) for their review. 15.E. To ~ON$IDEI~ AM~NDM]~T OF -x.n~_CQ~NTY C~rX~K ~. Mica~ ~tat~d ~i~ date and time had bean adv~rti~ad fo~ a public haarlng go ~ensid~r an amendment to the co~ty concerning ~amting of variances by th~ Director 'of Planning and substantial accord approval of CountF facilities. ~urther ~tated the propome~ ~hang~ would grant limited two f~t and would remove the su~tantlal accord proce~ public project~ o~ gove~eRtal p~ojects that follow the ~ideline$ of ~ County*s zoning ordinance and remain subject to zoning conditions. ~e noted the fettles, Cities and To~ Co~itt~9 denle~ ~e County's Charter bill for 1992 which ~ncludad ~ese two amen~ents but ~e amend~emts could included in gsneral legislation. should not have b~en included wi~ th~ oth~r Charter should c~ns~d~ th~ approval of mobil~ home requests as well; for County facilities and felt it should be amended; and t~at he f~t ~h= Plannlng C~ission shuul~ be ~rovi~d wi~ more authority. There being ~0 O~e el~e to ad~ezz thi~ i~e, t~e p~blic hearing wa~ clo~e~. re, ired public h~ari~g, ~e Charter amendments should go of the Legislative Program. After brief dis~ssion, on motion of ~. Barb~rr *seconded ~. ~cHale, the Board ap~rove~ ~he foliowing ~harter a~e~d~e~ts for udoption by the General As=e~ly. Section 7'. 4. ~l~DDi~g. department. Th~ plamning aepar~ent ghall be COmposed of = director of planning ~d suo~ employe~s as th~ board of supervisors may d~te~ine. The pla~ing dep~rtm~t ' shall per~o~ such 92-106 2/12/92 responsibilities as are impo~ed by general 1aw and as may designed by the planninq commission and boa~d of ~upervi~org. The director of plannimq s~all ~ave im~ediat~ 'dire=rich and control of the department, shall be appointed by the county administrator and shall serve subject to the sa~e terms conditions ss are applicable to othe~ department heads. In addition to the authority granted to the board of zoning appeal~ pur~ant to ~ection 15.1-495(b) of the Cede of V~rg~m~a~ 1950, a~ amende~, tho board of supe~isors by ordinance may authorize the ~ir~ctor of planning to ~ant a varianoe of not more ~an two feet from any buildimg setbuck requirement ¢onDained in the county's zoning o~ su~division ordinance if he finds in ~iting: (1) that ~e application OS the or~inance would ~r~uce undue hardship; that much hardmhip is not shared generally by other properties in the same zoning dlmtrlct and the ~a~e vicinity; and (3) that the authorization of su~ variance will not be ~tant~al detriment to a~Ja~ent property and that character of the zoning district will not be ~hanged by ~e granting of th~ variance. Section 7.6. Sub~tant~al Acco~i~w...of County Facilities. Any public area, facility or use o~ed by ~e County of ~esterfield within its territorial limits which ham been ~pproved by the board of ~up~viso~s following a publi~ hearing held pursuant to the county's zoning ordinance shall be ex,pt f~o~ the ~eq~i~um~nt for submittal to aD~ by the co~ty~s Dla~ing co~ission or governing body under section 15.1-456 of ~ Code of Virginia, 1950, a~ a~n~ed, long as suo~ puDliu area, facility or u~e remains ~ubject to O O O Vote: Unanimous TO $ON$IDE~ AN ORDIN~CE TO %~ATE A Posen OF A ]~ ~N F~ S~D~SION Mr. Welchons stated this date and time ha~ b~e~ advertised for a public hearing to conside~ an ordlnance to vacate a portion of a twenty-five foot right-of-way known as Rive~iew Driv~ within Cameron Fa~ S~ivi~ion. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the ordinance. On motion of F-r. McNale, ad~pte~ t~e £ell~Wing ordinance: Barber, the Board ~N ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTy. OF C~ESTERFIELD, VIR~T~IA, ("G~TOR") vacates to PAUL G. KUEHN and ROBIN 8. RICE,iN, GARY ~VIN~ and NO~T~0 LOV~G, ~OL~H C. W~L, HEP, A Virginia Partnership~ and portion of a 25' ~iqht of way kno~ Rivervipw, in cameron Farm Subdivision, Bermuda District, Chesterfield, Virginia, as .'sho~ on a plat thereof ~u]y recorded in the Clerk'x~ Office.'of the Circuit Court Chuu~ur{iel~ County ~n Plat Book 7, Pages 92 -107 ~EREAS, ~r. and Mrs. Paul G. Kuehn et als petitioned the Board of Snpervi~ers of Che~terfleld County, virginia to vacate s portion of a ~St right of way known as RiYer~iew, in Cameron Farm Subdivision, Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat dated April, 1936, recorded in the Clerk~E Offic~ of circui~ Court of said County in Pla5 Book 7~ Pa~es 14 and 15. The portion of right of way petitioned to be vacated is more fully desc~ribsd as follows: A portion of a 25' rfght of way known Riverview, the location of which is more fully shown on a plat by J. K. Timmons & Associates, P.O., dated ~ovomber 14, 1MM1, copy of which is attached. WHEREAS, ootice has been given pnreuant to Section · 5.i-~ of tho Cu~ of Viruinia. i950, as a~ended, by WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the 'continuance cf the poz~ion of right of way sought to be vaoate~. NOW~AEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF C~T~RFI~LD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: That pursuant to Section ~.1-45~(b) of th~ Code of V~ruinia, 1950, as amended, the iafere~a~d portion of right of way be and is hereby vacated, subject to the recordation cf Rivsr Crest Subd~vlslsn a. r~nbdivision of a portion of This ordinance shall be in full force and effect, ~ubjeot to the recordation of River Cre~t Subdivision a ~esubdivlslon of a portion of Cameron Farm, in accordance wi~h Section 15.1-4S2(b) of the Code ~f__V~r~inia, 1950, as amended' and certified copy o~ this ordinance, together with the plat attached hereto, shall t,~ recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in t~e Clerk's 0S£ics of the Circuit Court of Chest=rfield County, virginia pursuant to Section 15.1-4~5 of t--he ~.u~a.of virginia, 1950, as The effect of T21i$ Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to d~stroy the force and effect e~ the recording of the portion of the plat vacated. Thi~ O~d~nanee ~&'ll vest fee simple title to the right of way hereby vacated in the owners of the abutting lots within Camion Fa~m Subdivision, f~ee and clear of any rights Of public use. Accordingly, this 0r~inanos shall he indexed in th~ names of the County of Chesterfield as ~antor and the PAUL G. KUEBN ~ad ROBI~ G. KUE~N, GARY H. LOV~G and NOR~KO LOVING, RUDOLPH C. WALL, HEP, A Virginia Partnership, a~d ~ARI~EY MCLAUG~LIN and MARTI{A M. MCLAUGHLI~, or their ~uocsssors in title, as grantee. Vote: unanimou~ l~.~. TO ~ID~ A~ OI~DINANCE To VA~_A PORTION OF ,A 1~ ~. WelOhcns stated this date and tim~ had been advertised for a public ~esring to conmid~r an ordinance to vacate a portion of a ten foot sewer and water ea~e~eBt. No one came forward to Spe~k in favor of er against the ordinance. on mouion of Ma. Colbe~t~ ~eeonded by Mr. Mc~ala~ the Boa~d adopted the following ordinance: 92T108 -. 2/12/92 AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELDs VIRGINIA, ("GRANTOR") Vacates to PARKER 3LND LANCASTER C0R~OR~TION, ("GRANTEE"), a portio~ of u !0' sewer water easement on Lot 14. Sa~dston~ Subdi~islon, Matoaca Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, as sho~ on a plat =hereof duly recorded in ~e clerk's 0ffioe of th~ Circuit court of chesterfield County in Plat Book 66, Pu~e~ 51 and ~E~S, J. K. Ti~cnm & Associates, P.C., petitioned the Boa~ O~ S~e~viso~s CZ Chest~fleld County, Virginia vacate a potion of a 10' sewer and water easement on Lot ~4, Sandstone Ridge S~ivlmlon~ Ma~aca Magimterial District~ Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly ~own on a Dlat of record in the Clerk's Office of ~ ~irouit Court ~aid County in Plat Book 66, Pages ~1 and ~2, dated 23, 19S9, ~ad~ by J. K. Tigons & Associates, P.C, The A pcrtlon of a 10' ~ewer and water easement on Lot 14, Sandstone Ridge Subdivision, ~toaca District, Chest~fi~Id, V~rginia, shown on a ~lat thereof by J. K. Ti~on~ & Associates, P.C., dated De¢~ 20, 1991, copy oS which i~ atta~ed h~reto and ~de a 15.1-~3I O~ ~he ~ode of virginia. I~0, as ~an~, advertising; and, ~E~S, no p~lic necessity exi~t~ for the ~ontinuanoe NOW THE~FORE, BE IT 0RDAIN~ BY TEE BO~ 0F SUP~VISORS OF CHESTE~IELD CO~Y, VIRGINIA= That purnuant to section 15.1-4s2(b) OS th~ Code of Virginia, 1950~ a~ amended, tho aforesaid portion of easement be and i$ h~r~by vacated. This Ordinance mhall be in full force an~ effect in aco~rda~oe with Section 15.1-482(b} of the Co~e of Vir~inla, tcg%ther with the pla~ ~ttached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than ~irty day~ her~aftsr in the Clerk's office of the Circuit cou~ of ~sterfield County, Virginia pursuant to section 1~.1-485 of ~ Cod~ of~r~inia, 1950, as T~ ~f~o~ of thi~ Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-48S is to destroy Dhe force an~ effect of ~e recording ~ portion of the plat vaoated. Thi~ ordinanoe shall vest fee the property owne~ of Lot 14, Sandstone Ridge Subdivision Accordingly, ~i~ erdinance s~all be indexed in the names of the County of Chesturfietd us ~antor and Parker and Lancaster co~oration, or ~hair ~uccessors ~n title, as Vote: Unan~meus 2/12/92 On motion of l~r. McHale, seconded by Mr. Maven, the Board adjourned at 10:10 p.m. until February 14, 1991 at 3:00 p,~. Lanm B. Ramsey ~L Connty Administrator! ~airman 92-110 2/12/92