10-13-93 MinutesMr. Arthur S. War~e~, Chairman
Mr. Edward B. Barber, vice Chr~.
Mr. Whaley M. Colbert
Mr, Harry G. Daniel
Mr. J. L. McCall, III
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
Staff i~ Attendance:
Ms. Barbara Ben~e~, Dir.,
Office on Youth
Mr. Craig Bryant, bit.,
Utilities
M~. Terri ~%rgess, Interim
Dir.~ Newm & Public
In£ormation Services
Ms. M~rilyn Cole,
Asst. to County Admin.
Mrs. Doris R. De, art,
Assr. CO. Admin.,
Legis. Byes.
Deputy Ce. Admin.,
County Ombudsman
Dir., General Services
Dir., Auoounting
D~pu%y Co. Admin.,
Dir., Transportation
~r. Richard M.
Dir., ~nv. ~nglneering
Police Department
PLr. Z. D. Stith, Jr.,
D~puty Co. Admin.,
Mr. Warren callmd the reqularly mch~duled meeting to order at
3;10
.1.~. ~EPTEMBER 22~ 1993
On motion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by Mr- ~¢Hale, the Board
approved the minute~ of September 22, 1993, a~ submitted.
VOte: Una~i~ou~
1.B. G~?E~BER 50e 199~
At a reqular meetin~ of the Board of Supervisors on September
22, 1993, the Board adjourned to September 30, 1993 to meet
with Citizens for Responsible Government; however, since a
quorum of the Board did not attend this meeting, the masting
did not constitute a fornal meeting of the Board thus
alleviating the need to approve these minutes.
2. COLr~Ty ADMI~iSTRATOR'~
Mr. Ramsey ~ntrsduced Chief Pitt~an to present a brief
overview of the use of police weaponm.
Chief Pittmun premented an overview on the use of the 10 imm
semiautomatic pistol as a police weapon and stated in
the Federal Bureau Of Investigation (FD!) identified the 10
~ ss the best caliber weapon; that in 1990, th~
formed a committee to research the use of the 10 ~ and
decided it was the best caliber weapon; and the committee
to be used by the Police Department. ~e r~viewed early
There was brief discussion relative ~a the definition of a
weapon malfunctioning.
with %he l0 mm pistol~ 10 ~m pistols having been issued by
nation; the remults of a s~vey oendueted by the
Police Department in assessing officers' ~ati~faction of the
pistol; the lQ mm being the weapon used by the Kentucky state
Police; and ~iauta~atie Weapons being subject to jamming.
Administrator for Board distribution.
to County officers and stated he is confident t~io weapon is
reliable. ~e noted the TBI has recognized the 10 mm pistol
~ploye~o of the Police Department present at the meeting who
specialize in training.
Mr. Warren expressed appreciation to Chief Pittman for his
prementation and inquired as to the cost cf an
be approximately $1,000 a day until the a~sossment is
completed.
reliability ef police weapons. He ~nquired ~s to th~ number
of Police Depar~ent employees in favor of carrying the
pistol, c~ief Pittman stated he feels the majority of Police
Department employees are satisfied with the 10 mm. Mr.
93-652 10/13/93
Mr. colbert inquired as to whether there are any available
reports indicating the 10 nun pistol has malfunctioned in the
line e~ duty. chief Piutman sSated he is unaware cf any
incidences in which the 10 ~ malfunctioned in the line ef
du~y.
There was brief discussion relative to the state Police
selecting e 9 mm pistol to replace their 10 mm Smith and
wesson pistol and the County conducting an independent
assessment tc determine the reliability of the 10 mm weapon.
Mr. McHale stated while pe~eeptiun is an issue the Board has
to deal with, he feels it is the responsibility of the Board
independent assessment and if the analysis reveals the 10 mm
pistol is reliable and u££icers choose to uae an alternative
weapon, then the officer should be ~eeponsible for the
purchase of that weapon.
Mr. Daniel inquired as ~e whether there is diversity among
police departments across the country relating to the types
O£ weapons selected fur law enforcement use. Chief Pittman
~tated there is diversity un the types of weapon~ ~eleeted
for law snfors~ment uss. Kr. Daniel stated he feel~ the type
of weapon sale=ted should be ~tandard for all police
officers,
Mr. Warren stated he supports an independent assessment to
determine the reliability of the l0 mm pistol.
On ~otion of Mr, Colbert, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Soard
authorized an independent a~sessment to determine the
reliability of the 10 mm Smith and Wesson pistol used by the
county's Police Department.
F~r. Warren expressed appreciation to chief ~it%m~n for
updating the Board on =~is iSSUe and Xor his recent
leadeEship in the Police Department for DOt supporting any
There was brief Giseussi0n relative to th~ manner in which
the assessment should be conducted.
Mr. Barber stated he attended the annual picnics for
Cr~Etwood Farms and ~ylten Park Civic Associations; that he
attended tl%e USA B~itish Air announcement reception; that he
attended several Taxicab Advisory Board meetings; that he mst
with Citizens for Responsible Government for a breakfast
meetinq; that he held his "First Monday" constituents meeting
with the topic of discussion being trash collection services;
that his nmxt "First Monday" constituents meeting will be
held Nov~ber 1, 199~, with the topic of discussion being the
~e~ Air Learning center; tha~ he toe,ed Maymoat; and that h~
and Mr. McHale attended the Family and Courts System meeting.
He invited everyone to attend "Midlethian Village Day"
scheduled for October ~3, 1993,
~r. McHale stated he end Mr. CoSb~rt att~e~ ~o~nders Day ut
John Tyler Co~mmunity College and noted a new Student Center
has been established which has b~en named for Dr. Fre~te
Nicholas~ the past President of John Tyler Community College;
that he held two meetings regarding ~he proposed Jefferson
Davis e~te~p~ise zonu designation; and that he attended a
luncheon with tho Chester Village Women's Club, with the
topis of discussion being County r~latad isaacs.
93-653 10/13/93
Mr. Daniel stated he attended several civic association
meetings with concerns being ex-pressed about maintaining the
integrity of neighborhoods as it relates to crime issues and
taxes; that he attended a logistic conference meeting in
Riohmondl that he recently represented the Capital Region
Airport Come, lesion (CRAC), as Chairmam, on an economic
development trip to market and promote Richmond International
Airport; that he attended a CRAC meeting with the topic of
diecumsion being on effertm to market the Airport~ and that
(AdI) conference held in Nashville. He noted the~e ha~ been
an increase in passenger enplane~ent and cargo activity at
Richmond International Airport.
~4r. Warren stated he ham made several appointments to the
new multi-purpose building at the County Fairgrounds; that he
attended the Chrimtmaa Mother luncheon at Magnolia Grange;
that he had the opportunity to throw the first baseball at
the Diamond for the Richmond Mens senior Baseball League to
benefit the Ronald ~cDonald Souse on September 28, 1993; that
he attended a meeting with citiz~n~ for Responsible
¢overnment on September 30, 1993; that he taped a united Way
Rick-off announcement for Channel
Kenney and Board Chairmane Jackson T. Ward of Hanover County
a~d Joh~ A. Waldrop, Jr. of Henrico County; that he taped a
"Chesterfield Matters" program on education with Ms. Dianne
Pettitt, Clover Hill District School Board representative,
and Dr. Zarmhall smith, President of John Tyler Community
chief-elected officials from 22 jurisdictions ~n Cen=ral
Virqimis and was elected Chairman of the Central Virginia
Coalition; an~ t~at he participated, wi~h
in a reception on September 22, 1993 for Chemterfield County
emergency rempoaae and relief efforts. Me submitted into the
Petersburg; Mr. R. R. Cosby, Chairman of the Powhatan Board
of Supervisorm; Mr. James B. McNeer, Mayor of Colonial
~eights; and Mr. ~. Paul ~arne$, Mayor 0£ ~opewell,
expressing appreciation for the opportunity to attend the
C~J~N~ES .I~..THE ORDER O~ PRESEN~ATION
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by F~r. Colbert, the ~oard
as "Red Ribbon Week" to i~ediately fellow this i~sm; added
0rdinanoe to Amend the Code o~ the Ceun~y of Chesterfield,
1978¢ es Amended¢ by Amending and Reenacting Section
~?.~ Relating to Restriction on Keeping Inoperative
?-~.ll.c.; added Item M.D., an Executive Session Pursuant
Section 2.1-344(a) (7), Coda of Virginia, 1950, am ~n~nded,
for Consultation with Legal Counsel Regarding an Appeal of
Boa~d of Zoning Appaul Special Exception Approval to follow
Citizens on Unscheduled Matters and claims to follow Item
14.F., A Public ~aring to Consider the Midloth~an
Mu~uenot/Robleus Roa~ Area Plan, an Amendment to the 1986
County's Comprehensive Plan and, adopted the agenda, as
amended.
Vote: Unanimou~
1~.I. RB~OSNIZIN~ OCTOBER ~3-~1j. 199~ ~ "RED RIBBON WEEKI~
M~, Bennett introduced Deputy Barry Arnold of the Sheriff's
Department and Ms, Kay Drew o~ =he school Student services
Dep=rtment, who ~ere present tc receive the resolution.
eta=ed "Red Ribbon Week" ie an annual and national event to
c~raw attention to substance abuse and d~o~$tr~te the
On motion of the Board~ the following re~olutiom Was adopted:
W~EREAS, alcohol a~d other drug use in this nation has
reached epidemic ~taguu; and
WHeReAS, Chester~iel~ County has been keenly aware cf
the de~tructive potential sub~tance abuse r~pre~ent$ in e¥~ry
community and has sought to address th~z is~ne through
creation of the Drug and Alcohol Abuse Task Force, support cf
the local CADRE~ and funding of governmental services related
to substance abuseF and
WHEREAS, it is imperative that visible, unified
prevention education effor:m by community members be launched
to reduce the demand for drugs; and
W~EREAS~ the Virginia Federation of Coi~mu/litles for Drug
F~e~ Youth, Chesterfield County'm CADRE, Chesterfield County
~ohool~, add the office un Youth are sponsoring the
R~bbon Campaign, offering citizens the opportunit~ to
WHEREAS, ~he Red Ribbon Campaign will be
throughout Virginia during "Re~ Ribbon Week," October
1993; and
~R~AS, private citizens of all ages, bus~n~s~ and
government employees, and prof~ional~ will demonstrate
their co~itmen~ ~o Orug-free, healthy Iife~tylem by wearinq
and displaying red ribbons during thi~ week-long
NOW, TH~EFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
31, 1993 as "Red Ribbon Week" and enoo~ages its citizens
par:icipate in alcohol and ether druq education and
Superv~or~ encourage~ all citizens to pledgm: TH= WAY TO ~E,
Vote:
and Ms. Drew an~ expressed appreciation for thei~ efforts
~uppo~ti~g such a significant
SUBPLY AND DEMAND REVIEW ~ DRINKXN~ W~T~ QUALITY
Mr. J~mes Dunn, representing the Richmond C~amber of
Commerce, stated a technical and advisory committee
water issues and introduced Mr. Charles Warren of J.
Timmon~ and A~o¢iates, a member c~ ~ha ~tudy
93-655 10/13/93
............. II. l__£ .... [; , L ............
Mr. Charles Warren stated the Water Review Panel consisted of
nine individuals from the Chamber of Commerce; that varieus
work sesslcn~ were held to cellest and analyze data; that the
Panel feels the region should sssist Hanover County iD
protecting water resources from encroachment by outside
interests; that the Panel believes it outlined and
prioritized alternatives in the Master Plan that will guide
localities in managing th~ water supply and needs of the
regien~ and that the Panel received full cooperatio~ from all
localities, ae ex. reseed appreciation to the ~enrlco Board
of Super~isors for their support and Eenover Couaty for
endorsing the rs~srt. He noted a copy o~ u letter from Mr.
Charles Warre~ he~ been ~ub~itted to the Board regarding the
Swif~ Creek Reservoir Treatment Plant.
Mr. Warren referenced the letter submitted by Mr. Charles
Warren and clarified that Kanover County is not implying the
swift Creek Water Treatment Plant be removed from s~rvice
unless Chesterfield County deems it tO be in the best
interest Of the citizens. Me stated the swift Creek
Reservoir i~ the County's cleanest source of water, t~e
expensive source of water, and the County will pro,eot the
source,
Mr. charles Warren stated the Panel feels am long as ~he
swift Creek Reservoir is a viable cost-effective water
There was brief discussion ~elative to the difference
recommendations of this Panel as compared to a study
performed b~ the Rich~0Bd Regional Planning District
Commission approximately ~ou.r yours ago; the tlmefra~ in
which the Panel feels Eenrice County can begin their project;
and resolving issues through prsfessionully
ugreement~ rather than having to ~o through an a~th0rity type
of process.
Mr. Barber inguired as to whether the Plan will have any
adverse impact on the City of Richmond's historic Ka~awha
development. Mr. Charles Warren stated the Panel decided
drinking water is the highest priority at this time and the
Panel feele~ after reviewing all fnfol~matien and due to the
James River Water Management Plan, that the canal needs
be met. He noted in extreme drought cond~tisn~ there will he
low flows in ~he river which will impact canal flows.
Swift Creek Reservoir remaining and being a critical water
source in Chesterfield County.
Mr. Warren expressed appreciation to Mr. Dunn and Mr. Charles
Warren ~or their initiative and leadership. He state~
feels this iu the beginning of a stronger partnership amd
water issues are important i~sue~ which ~aquire ~ignifioant
attention.
DEFERRED ITEMS
APPOINTMENTS
Mr. Stlth ~tated at it~ ~eeting on september 22, 1993, the
Doard deferred consideration of the re~aining nomination for
a me~ber to serve on the Greater Richmond Transit Company
(GRTC) Board of birector~.
Greater Richmond Transit Company Board of Directors,
representing tho County ut-large.
~r. Daniel nominated Mr. Joe Ward to eerve on the Greater
County at-large.
(It i~ noted formal appointment to the Greater Richmond
Tramsit Company Board of Direo%ore will be considered a~
October 27, %~93 Board meeting.)
7. NEW BOSINESS
?.A. CONSIDERATION OF WO~K PROORAMS FOR REVIEW OF THE
~L~ ~UN RO~D/ROBIOUS ROAD ~
~r. $~COb~o~ ~tat~d at th~ Board meeting on September 2~,
1~93, ~taff wa~ dlrected to prepare alternative work programs
to a~e~ the ne~d for p~ssible changes to the Northern Area
Land U~ and Trans~or~ation Plan in %he Old GUn/RObiOUS Road
area mhd outline~ Alternative A and Alternative B. Me
land u~e recommendations in the Old ~un/Robious vicinity
development of 1.5 units per acre or less. ~e further stated
~taff e~timat~s thi~ project will take aDDroxim~tely 21 day~
of ~taff tim~, ~tart~ng in D~cember and ending in May.
On motion of ~r. ~arber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
au~ori~ed ~taff to initiate Alternative A to review ~e
Road/Robious Road area. (It is ~oted a cody of the wo~k
9ro~ram is filed with the paDers of thio Board.)
Vot~: Unanimous
?.B. APPOINTI(EN~B
On motion of ~r. McHale, oecond=d by Mr. Colbert, the Buard
ouopended its rules at this time to allow simultaneous
nomination/appointment of a member to m~rve on the Drug and
Alcohol Abume Task Force, re~reoenting the County at-lurg~.
On motion of Mr. ~cHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Beard
~i~Bltan~eugly nominated/appeint~d ~. Anthony J. Aleara$,
repre~entlnq the County at-large~ to serve on the Drug and
Alcohol Abuse Ta~k Toree, whose term is effective immediately
and will b~ at the pleasure of the Beard.
Vote: Unanimou~
7.C. BTBEETLIGHT IESTALLATIO~ COST APPROVALB
On motion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved the following streetlight installation oo~t
approvals:
Dale District
* Sale~ Ch~c~ Road, Vicinity of 9821 on the existing pole
¢o~t to in,tall %&ght: $67.
Matoaca District
~ Replace existing ~tre~tlight at the junction of the
Woodlake Village Parkway loop
Cost to install light: $999.
Bluff Parkway and Timber Bluff Parkway
Cos: to in~tall light: $999.
* Replace existing streetlig~t at the intersection of Lake
Bluff Rarkway and Woodlake V±llage ~aNkway
Cost to install light/ $999.
7.D. CONSENT IT~F~
7.D.1. ~&)OPTION OF RESOLIY~IONS
7.D.l.a. RE~OGNIZIN~ I~R. K~VIN BRYA~F~ ~PACEK UPON
ATTATNIN~ R~NK O~ ~LE
On motion of Mr. Colbert, ~econd~d by ~ ~o~ale, th~ Board
adopted the followin~ resolution:
WHEREAS~ the Boy Scouts of America was i~corporate~ by
Mr. William D. Boyce on F~bruary ~t 1~10; and
WHER~A~, the Boy Scouts of America was founded bo
promote citizenship training, personal development, and
fitne~ of individuals; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit
in a wide v~ricty of fields, ~erving in a leadership position
in a troop, carrying out a service ~rojeot beneficial to his
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Kevin B~yant spaceR, TrOOp 801, sponsored
by South Minster Presbyterian Church, has accomplished tho~e
high standards of commitment and ha~ reached the
goal of ~agl~ Scout which is received by less than two
percent of those indlvidual~ entering the Scouting mevement~
and
WH~R~AS~ growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, an~ priding
himself on th~ gr-at accomplishments of hi= County~ Sevin
indse~ a member of a new generation of prepared young
citizens of whom we can all be very proud.
~OW, THEREFORE BE iT RESOLVED, that th~
County Board of Supervisors hereby e~tend~ it~
congratulatlons to Mr. Kevin ~ryant Spaosk and acknowledges
the good fortune of the Co~ty to have such an o~tstanding
young man a~ on~ of its citizens.
Vote~ Unanimous
DAy~
On motion of Yir. Colbert, seconded by Mr. ~cHale, the Board
adopted the following rs~olution:
W~REA$, au~ordlng to the Joint Legislative Audit and
Review Commission, Virginia's local governments are ~ubject
to ~91 federal and ~ate mandates; and
WHEREAS, Unfunded mandates on local governments have
increased ~ignifican~ly in resent years; and
WHEREAS, federal amd state mandates require cities,
counties, and towns to perform duties without consideration
of local circumstances er capacity; and
WHEREAS, in some eased, mandates require local
governments to redirect their priorities to meet Sederal and
sta~e ebjeotlves rather than oommunlty objeetives~ and
WHEREAS, e~oeosive federal and stat~ regulations on
often requiring increases in local taxes and fees and/or
reduced local serviced ~or residents; and
W~EP~EAS, federal and state mandates too often are
inflexible, one-size-fits-all requirements tha~ impose
unrealistic timeframes and specify procedures or facilities
where les~ costly alternatives might be just as
and
WHElkS, existing mandates impose harsh pre~sures on
local budgets, often requiring increase~ in local taxe~; and
WIHEREAS, the cumulative impact of these legislative and
reg~lla=ory actions directly affect the citizens of our
cities, ¢~unti~s, and town~; and
WHeReAS, ~he virginia Kunieipal League, the virginia
Associatie~ of Counties, ~nd the Virginia School Boards
Association are working with localities, school boards, and
organizations across the nation to begin a public education
campaign to help citizens understand and then reduce
burden and inflexibility of unfunded mandates, beginning with
a '~National Unfunded Mandates Day" on october 27, 1993.
NOW, TH~R~0R~ s= IT R~$OLVED, that Chesterfield County
endorses the effort~ of the Virginia Municipal League~ the
Virginia A~scclatlon of Counties, and the Virginia School
Boards Association and their national counterpart~, and
supports working with the national grou~s to fully inform o~r
citizens about the impact of federal and atate mandates on
our governments and the pocketbooks cf OUT ~itizens.
AND, BE IT FURTMER RESOLVED, that Chesterfield County
plans to redouble efforts to inform ~emb~r~ of our
Congressional and General Assembly delegations about the
impact of federal and statm ~nda~es and plans to work with
the delegations to reduce the burden of unfunded mandates on
Ai~D, E~ IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Chesterfield County
proclaims October ~7, 1993 as "Unfunded Mandates Day" in
Chesterfield County in observance of "National Unfunded
Mandates Day."
Vote: Unanimous
~.D.~.c. SU~ORTIN~ T~E ~PORTS OF T~ CA~ITA~ REGION
AIRPORT ~.~ISSION TO MARKET ~ PROMOTE HIC}IMOND
On motion of ~tr. Colbert, ~ecended by Mr. McHale, the Eoard
adopted the following reoolu~ion=
WHEREAS, the Richmond metropolitan area is fortunate to
have a ~trong a~d diverz~ economic base cunaisting of
manufacturing financial, service, governmental, and
educational components; and
93-659 10/13/93
WHEREAS, the ~uppcrt required by this existing economic
base and the £ut~re of its further development are highly
dependent on an adequate ~ystem of air tren~pertatlon
including buth passengers and cargo; and
WH=REA$, the rapidly expanding demands of a globallzed
economy, req~i~ing world Co~petitiun, will further ine~ea~
demand for timely, cost-effective air transportation; and
WHEREAS, the aggressive promotion of both domestic and
international passenger air charter flight~ offer a major
opportunity to showcase the tourism oppsrtunities of
area, to increase retail ~ale~ and to generally have a
slgn~flcant economic ~mpact on the R~chmond metropolitan
ar~a; and
~ER~AS, the increasing demand for rapid and secure air
cargo shipments may well be the difference between success
and failur~ of international maDufact~ri~g an~ ~ale~; and
%PIZKEA$, the Eiehmcnd International Airport is ideally
~ituated to provide the facilitie~ for all of these
activities to the significant benefit of our entire business
Now, THEREFORE BE IT R~SOLVED, by th~ mambos of
Capital Region Airport co, lesion, acting by and through
CO~i~Pio~ itself a~d through the individual jurisdiCtiO~S
th~ countie~ of Chesterfield, Hanover, and ~enrico and
City of Richmond, that all prudent measur~ will be t~n to
market and ~romote the Richmond International Airport on both
a domuutic and global basis, soliuiting immediate and
appropriate me~er~ of the Virginiu Congressional
by Fredericksburg to the nor~, Petersburg to the south,
Charlottesville to the we~t, and Williamsbur$ ~o the
(4) all appropriate federal, state, and local agencies; and
(5) all interested businesses, trade associations, civic
organizations, and private citizens who would derive
immediate ben.fit from thou= effortu.
AND, BE IT F~TMER RESOLVED, the Co~ission authorizes
its chal~an tu uu~unica~m =he urgency of ~e n~d ~o ~av~ a
unified regional effort to accomplish the goal of ensuring
that the Richmun~ International A~rport, and the co~un~ty
z%rv~, beco~e~ a~ aggressive and active participant in the
global air transports=ion
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Colbert, ~e00nded by Mr. MeHalo, ~he Board
reaffirmed %~he following re~olutions as Mr. Daniel was absent
from =he September 22, 1993 Board of Supervisors meeting and
for ceremonial purposes hi~ nam~ wan ~ignod to
resolutions:
RECOGniZING O~TOBER ~, 199~ AS "FI~EFIGHTER APPRECIATION DAY"
'~WHEREA$, in the 1993 session of the Virginia General
Assembly a Senate 3olnt R~olutio~ wa~ passed establishing
the first day of Fire Prevention Week in 19~3 a~ "Firefighter
Appreciation Day ie Virginia;'~ and
W~EREAS, tko Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
desires to honor those w~o give thei~ time and energy to help
protect the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
W~]~FJ~, flreflghter~ stand r~ady to plume their lives
on the line everyday, 24 hours a day~ to serve their fellow
W~EREAS, the year 1993 has been a most demanding year
for their s~rvie¢~ in the Chesterfield County area; and
W~R~AS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
done by ~e~terfield County firefight~r~.
NOW, TH~OR~ ~Z IT RESOLVED, %hat the Chesterfield
County Boa~d cf Supervisors reco~nizem all County
firefight~rs for ~elr outstanding services and establishes
october 3, 1993 a~ "Firefighter. Appreciation Day'~ in
Chesterfield County."
RECO~NISIN~ OCTOBER 8-~0, X99~ AS "RIC~OND HETRO~OLIT~
"WHEREAS~ Christopher Columbus diecover~d th~ New World
on October 12, 1492 and we since have celebrated that dace as
an important A~ericen holiday; and
WI{EREASI a holiday weekend in the Fall is a wonderful
tim~ ~u hulda sporting event; and
W~EP~EAS, the s~ort of ~occsr i~ the fa~test growing
sport played by American youth, with thousands of boys and
~EAS, ~he Richmond Metropolitan Youth Soccer Lea~e,
consisting of 19 clubs with a %oral of 1~5 E~lect
fielding 1,600 or more players (and an addltlon~l 13~000
and Charlottssville, and the Countie~ of Chemterfield,
~a~over, Heurico, Orange, Powhatan, and Spotsylvania,
sponsoring ~a llth Annual Col~b~s Day ToUrnament on October
~-10, 1993; and
~ER~S, Pocosho~k Valley Youth Soccer Lea~e, a
Chest~rfi61d County soccer club~ i~ homting ~aid event for
the ninth con~cutiv~ year, utilizing 27 ~occer fields au
complexes in Chesterfield County; and
~ER~S~ ~O2 moccer tea~ (each with 15 or more players
and friend~] have b~en invited %o play in the Richmond
Metropolitan Youth Soccer L~ague C~lumbum Day To~nam~nt,
coming from Virginia, N~rth Carollna~ Naryland, W~nt
Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ne~ Jersey and Canada; ~nd
~E~A9, theme tournament participants will be ~unting
approximately 1,000 rooms in mor~ ~an 14 hotels
Chesterfield County and purchaming food and oth~r items
during the weeken~ in County restaurants an~ businms~s; and
~AS, =he revenue qensrated for chesterfield county
by this one event should be app~eoiaDle.
NOW; TH~EFO~ BE IT ~SOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County ~oar~ of supervisor~ hereby ~olar~= ~ w~ek~nd
Octobe~ 8-10, 1993 as "Richmond Metropolitan Youth Soccer
League Columbus Day Soccmr Tournament Wa~end"
~emterfield County~ Virginia."
93-661 ~0/~3/93
"WHEREAS, the World Federation of the Deaf is an
international organization composed of seventy national
associations cf the deaf, which in collaboration with the
United Nations (UNESCO, World Health Organization and
Intsrna~ional Labor office), serves all countries in the
enhancement of the social, economic, and cultural lives of
deaf and hard-of-hearing people; and
WHEREA$~ the Wsrld Federation 0£ the Deaf has in t~as
past forty-two year~ provided leadership at the international
level in medicine and audiology, psychology of deafness,
educational development and innovation, vocational
rehabilitation, communlcation~ mmthodolcpy, personal and
social welfare, art and culture, parent education, and
religious activities; and
WHEREAS, the National Association of t/ne Deaf (NAD) will
participate as an integral part of the Deaf World We~k
celebretion of the World Federation cf the Denf; and
WHEREAS, repr~sentative~ from a wid~ area of leadership
in the United States of America ~ervlng deaf and hard-of-
~earing populations throughout the world will be observing
this significant event in recognition of the contributions
geared to the needs of deaf and ha~d-of-hea~in~ people
throughout the country~ and
~EREAS, the County of Chesterfield offers its
wholehearted welcome and best wishes to all participants for
a renewed spirit OE togetherness tempered by intsnsiEie~
commitment to a quality life for the entire deaf and hard-of-
hearing population in the nat~on.
NOW, T~EREFORE BE IT NE~OLUED, that the Chnsterfi~ld
County Board of ~upervisors does h~r~by proclaim September
t9-25, 1993 as "National Deaf Awareness Week" in Chesterfield
County and invitQs all of its citizens to joiD in the
observance of this week-long occasion."
7.D,~, ~.MHNDK~TS TO JOHN TYLER OOEMUNITY COLLEGE DEDICATION
On motion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by ~Lt. ~eHale, the Board
~ended Paragraphs II.2., II.$., and III.19 by clarifying the
county must convey t~e John Tyle~ site at thc time
coll~ge will be built and limiting John Tyler's obligation to
comply with local planning requirements by making County
r~quests advisory only. (It is noted a copy O£
dedication agreement is filed with the paper~ of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
?.D.4, ~ME~NT TO SCBOOL Ck~ITAL ~PPROPRI~TION TO PERMIT
~IDDL~ SCHOOL
on motio~ of M~. COlbert, seconded by Mr. McMale, the Board
approve~ a resolutian adop~eo by t~o ssheol Board revising
estimated revenues and increasing appropriatio~ i~ the
School capital Improvement Program (CIP) Fund by $87,6S4 to
permit energy efficiency improveme~t~ at Falling Cz=~
school.
Vote: Unanimous
10/13/95
7.P.S. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS PeR N~W SCHOOL BOARD SRANTS
CIS-VGAP
CI~-Burger King
Academy
Project SHOOT~
on motion of Mr. colbert, seconded by Hr. MoHale, ~%e Board
approved a resolution adopted by the $~hQol Board revising
estimated revenues and increasing the Inutruction
~pro~rlatlcn category in the School Grants Fund as fellows:
Grant Fundin~ Amount
VA Guaranteed Assistance $73,000
Program
Burger ~ing/GI~ Foundation $40,000
9.444
Total 'Increase to Instruction Appropriation
Category in the School ~rants Fund $1~.444
And, further, thc Board approved a resolution adopted by th~
School Board increasing the Instruction appropriation
category in th~ School Boar~ Grants Funds by $2~,29~, which
fund~ were donated from the Knight~ of Virginia Assistance
for the Retarded for ~he Special Ed Equipment KOVAi% Gras~,
Vote: U~ani~ou~
On mo~ien oi Mr. colbert, seoonded by ~r. McHsle, the Board
Abuse D~partment ~xpenditure appropriations by $81,700, whic~
f~nds ha~e b~n ~war4ed to the Chesterfield Community
1) $31,260 in federal funds to provide additional treatment
2) $30,007 in federal funds to maintain consumers with
seriou~ m~ntal illness in th~ community.
3) $20,440 in State MR Chapter l0 funds t~ provide services
under th~ ¢mnibu~ ~udget ~eduotion ac~ (OBP.%) of 1957
Vote: Unanimous
(It is no~ad ~hess funds are expected to continue.)
7.0.?. ~_U~T.EOR PERMISSION ~ROM ~USUENOT LITTL~
LEAGUE TO LOCATE ~LECTRT~.~CORE BOARD~ ON
~n ~0tio~ of ~Lr. Colbert, seconded by Mr. McHsle, the Board
approved a request from ~uguenot Little League to in~ta11
five electronic scoreboards at Robious Athletic Complex
baseball fiel~ behind Robisue Elementary and ~idd]s schools,
~ubject to the execution of a license agreement.
noted a~ part of the agreement with ~he Huguenot
League~ the County will pay routine maintenance an~
~lectricity co,ts for the scoreboards. ~uguennt Little
LeagBe will insur~ the scor~board~ and provide for major
re~alrs and future replacement. The County will have
optional use of the scoreboards for non-Huguenot Littl~
L~ag~e events. The Parks a~d Recreation Department has
93-663 10/13/93
agreed to absorb the routine maintenance and electricity
expen~e~ within their departmental appropriation.)
Vote: Unanlmoum
FOR COU~T¥ ADMINT~T~%TCR TO ENTER
INTO AOREEMEETS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROUTE
OF NECESSARY FUNDS
On motion of FEC. Colbert, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
authorized the Coun%y Administrator to enter into a~reements
with the virginia Department of Transportation, private
consultants, and contractors, subject to a~prsval by the
county Attorney for construe=ion of t~e Route 10/Harbou~ East
Village crossover and appropriated $20,000 in antioipate~
develope~ contributions for the construction. (It iS ~eted a
sopy of toe vicinity s~etc~ is ~iled wit~ t~e papers si this
Board.)
7.D.9. REQUEST FOR V~I~NSE FOR 4401 DUN~3~VEN ROAD
on motion of ~r. Colbert, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
initiated an application for a variance for a~01 Durhraven
Road in Mayfair Estates, Dale Magisterial District.
Vote: Unanimous
THE FIRET :~MENDMENT TO THE NORTHERN ~RE~ Li~ND~XLL
O~ERA~IONS AGREEMENT NITH WALTER C. LINK,
INCORPO~TED
On ~otion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by Mr. ~c~ale, the Board
authorized the County Admioiatr~or to exesute the Fir~=
~en~ent to the Northern Area Landfill Operations Agreement
with Wal~er C. Link, Incorporated and authorized the transfer
of $370,000 from the Reserve for Capital Projects. (It is
noted a copy of ~he First Amendment to the Sanitary Landfill
Operation Agreement i= filed with the paper~ of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
7.n.11. SET DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS
7-D-ii-a, TO CONSIDER /~N ORDINANCE TO ~END THE CODE 0P THE
ADDIN~ A NEW SECTION 21.1-243.Z ~BL~TING TO
Os motion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by F~r. McHele, the Board
set the date of November 10, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. for a public
hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the code of
County of Ch~%erfi~ld, 197S, as amended, by amending and
~4~.~ relating to ~he sale o~ alcoholic beverages near
schools.
93-664 10/13/93
.7..D.~.b. TO BONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO ;u~EED THE CODE OF
gp~NTY OF CHESTBRPIE~D, 1978. A8 AHENDED, BY
On motion of ~r. Colbert, seconded by ~r. ~=Hale, the ~oard
~et the ~ate o~ November 10, 199~ at 7=00 p.m. for a public
Cotl~ty of Chesterfield! 1978, ~ amended, by amending and
permitting boat ~al~, Service~ repair, and rental.
Vote: Unanimous
?.D.11.o. TO CON~IDER ~ ORDINAI~CE TO A~ND THE ,CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERTIELD, 1978, A~ ~ENDED. ~
AK~NDING ~%ND ~E~NACTING SECTIONS ~1-8.1, 21-9.
C~IA~GING T~E ~I~LE TO ARTICLE II, DIVISION 1.
TO ADD MODIFICATIONS TO DEVELOgM~tT ~TANDARD~ AND
hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the
County of Chenterfield, 1975, as amende~, by amendin~ and
· 7~ ~.~-15, and ~1.1-19 rela~ing to variances and
changing ~he title ~o Article II, Division 1~ to add
7.D. Xl.d.
TO CON~IDER ~N O~INANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE
~OUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, ~978, AS A~DED. BY
TO RESTRTCTION ON KEE~ING INOPERATIV~ MOTC~
VEHICLES AND REKOVAL O~ ~UCH VEHICLE8
on notion o£ Mr. Colbert, eeeonded by Mr. MoHalk, the Board
set the dute of November 10, ~99~ at ?;oo ~.m. for a ~abllc
h~aring to consider an OMdinanoe to amend the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, f9~8, ~ amended, by amending and
raemactln~ Section 14.1-27.1 relating to restriction on
keeping inoperaf~v~ ~oto= vehicles and removal nf such
vehicles.
Vote: Unanimou~
Mr. Micas disclo~ed to the Board that hi~ children ar~
members of the Poseidon Swim Team and ~tated he would not be
a£fautad hy this request, declared a potential conflict of
interest pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of
Interest Act, a~d excused himmelf fram the meeting.
On motion cf Kr. Col~ert~ seconded by M~, MCHule, the Board
approved the following blngo/raffl~ permi~:
93-665 10/13/93
ORGANIZATION TYPE
Poseidon swimming, Bingo/Raffle 1993
Incorporated
St- Edward Epiphany Dingo/Raffle 1994
School
Junior Federated Raffle 1993
Woman's Club of
Chester
Vote: Unanimous
APPROPriaTION OF IN~E~EZT EI~NING~ TO THE GEOGRAPHIC
INFORN=%TION SYSTEM ACCOUNT FOR THE W~TERJ~EWER
On motion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by Mr. ~oHale, tho Board
appropriated $694,757 in interest earning~ from the
Geographic Information system (GIS) Account to ~he GI$
Capital Project Account for the Water/Sewer Conversion
Project, which funds are as follows:
Interest Earnings $494,757
Un~ of ~und~:
Water/sewer conversion
Oracle RDBM~ ~0,00O
Additional Storage 30,000
Additional Training
Total Uses: $494,757
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance
with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
his examination of Tuskwillew Drive, Sanohez Road, o~Bisque
Pines, Section A, Dale District.
seconded by Mr. McMale, it is r~molv~d that Tuskwillow Drive,
Sanchmz Rca~, o'~isque Drlve~ La Rosa Road an~ Baron Drive in
a portion of Land-O~Pines, Section A, Dale District, be and
they hereby are established as public reads.
And Dm i~ furthe~ resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hureby is ruqumst~d to take into
the Secondary system, Tuskwillo~ Drive extends .32 miles from
from ~hs intersection of Route 2122 to the interseetlen of
This re~uest i8 inclusive of the adjacent slopm, might
distance, clear zone and designated Virginia D~p~rtm~nt of
These roads serve 92 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia D~partment cf Transportation an
unrestricted right-of-way of 50' wit~ ~eoesSe~y easements for
outs, fills and drainage for all of these roads.
This section of Land-O-Pines is recorded as follows:
see%ion A. Plat sock 10, Pages 25, 26, 27, & 28. April 1,
1957.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the Co~nty Environmental Engineer, in accordance
with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
his exanination of Church Hay Road, Ho~seshoe Bay Court and
Paget Court in Hamilton, Matoaoa District.
Upon consideratiun whereof, and on motion o~ Mr. Colbert,
me.ended by ~ MoHele, it is ~eoolved that Church Bay Road,
District, be and they hereby are e~tabliuh=d a~ public roads.
A~d be it f~rther re~olved, that the Virginia Department of
=he intersection of Rou~e 3970 to tho intersection of
intersection of Churuh ~ay Road to the cul-de-sac. Horseshoe
distance, clear zone and designated virginia Department of
These roads serve 34 lots.
And be it fur%her resolved, that tho ~oard o~ Supervisors
urncestrieted right-of-way e£ 40' with necessary eas~menL~ for
Hamilton is recorded as follows~
Th~s day the County Environmental Enqineer~ in aero.dance
with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
his examination of Holly View Parkway~ Spring Traae Drive,
Spring Trace T~rrace and Spring Tr~ee Plac~ is Spring Trace,
Section G and Dedication of Spring Trace Drive and a portion
of Holly View Parkway, Matoaca District.
Upon consideration whereof, sad on motion e~ ~r. Colbert,
seconded by Mr. McHsle, it is resolved that ~olly View
Parkwmy, Spring Trace Drive, Spring Trace Terrace and Spring
Trace Place in Spring Trace, Section G and Dedication of
Spring Trace brivs and a portion of Holly View Parkway~
~ateaca Di~t~iet, be and they hereby are established as
public roads.
And be it £u~ther resolvsd~ that the virginia Department of
the secondary system~ Holly View Parkway extends .13 mile~
fro~ the intersection of Route &~ to the intersection cf
Spring Trace Drive. Spring Trace Drive extendm .15 miles
from the ~nd of Ro~te 4?22 to the intersection o~ Holly View
S3-667 10/13/93
Parkway. Spring Trace Terrace extends .09 miles from the
inter~ectlcn of ~pring Trace Driv~ to the ¢~l-de-$a¢, Spring
Truce Place e×tends .04 miles from the intersection of Spring
Trace Terrace to the cul-de-sac.
This rsguest is inclusive of the adjacent slope, nlgh~
disrobes, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
Transpor:atien drainage easements.
These roads serve 17 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Snpervimore
guaran4ee$ to the Virginia Department of Transportation an
unrentrictsd right-of-way of ~o~ with necessary easements for
cuts, fills and drainage for all cf these roads except Spring
Trace Orive which has a 50' right-of- way and Holly view
Parkway which has a variable width 70* to 100' right-of-way,
Thi~ section Of spring Trace is recorded as follows:
Section G. PiR~ Book 77, Page 16, November 7, 199~.
Dedication of Spring Tr~ce Drive and a portion cf Holly view
Parkway.
Plat Book 6~, Page 52- March 6, 19~9.
Vote: Unanimous
T~is day bh~ County Environmental Engineer~ in accordance
with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
his examination of spring Trace Turn and spring Trace ~ew~ in
SpriDg Tr~ce, Section H, Matoaoa District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Colbert,
seconded by Mr. McHale~ it ie resolved that Spring Trace Turn
and Spring ~race Mews in Spring Trace, Section M, Matoaca
District, be a~d they hereby ara ~stablished as public roads.
And be it further remolved~ that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, ~e and it hereby is requested to take into
the 8mcondary System, Spring Trace Turn extendg .07
from the intersection of Spring Trace Drive to the cul-de-
sac. Spring Trace Mews extendm .OM miles fro~ th~
in~armection of spring Trace Turn to the ~ul-de-sac.
Thla recfmest is inclusive cf the adjaoent slope,
distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervi~or~
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation an
unrestricted right-of-way of 40' ~ith necessary easement~ for
cuts, fills and drainage for all of =hose roads.
Thi~ section of Spring Trace is recorded as follows:
Section H. Plat Book 78, Page 3~. ~ay 1~, 199],
93-668 10/13/93
7.D. 15. ~A~BR~MENT POH M~INT~NANCE CF ~TOPd4WATBR D~3~I]FAGE
SYSTEM ~ND REST M~NAGEMENT P~CTICE FACILITY ~o~
WHITT~ LINCOLN/MERCURY
On motion of 5~r. Colbert, seconded by Mr. McCall, the ~oard
authorized ~he County Ad~imietrator to execute an Agreement
for Maintenance of s Stornwat~r Drainage ~y~t~m ~nd B~st
~nagement Practice Facility ~ith Ja~ ~itten, the
o~er/developer of Whitten Lincoln/Mercury, with the County's
only involvement being to a~e the Mainten~nc~ A~reement is
followgd by th~ owner as a~groved by the County Attorney.
(It i~ noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed with the
Daper~ of thi= Board.]
Vote: Unanimou~
7.D.16. REOUBST TO ~I~ ~ILLI~ B. DU~L IN TMB ~Ht~ITION
OF A W~TER EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OF WINPIBLD
BROWI~ JR,~ ESTATE
After brief discussion, on me,ion of ~r. Colbert, ~eoonded by
~r. ~o~ale, the ~oard authorized Riqht of Way staff to aid
Mr. William B. Duval in the acqui~itlon of a water ~asemen~
acros~ the pro, arty of Mr. Winfield Brown~ Jr., Estate, to
serve Pypers Pointe Subdivision, ~ubj~ct to the execution of
a contract by Mr. Dural agreeing to pay for all costs. (It
is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers o~ thio
Heard.)
FROM MR. AND ~1%S. DAVID CRAIN TO ENCROACH WITHIN
AN BIGHT POeT DR~TNA~E AND UTILITY E~EMEbF~
On motiom of ~t~. colbert~ seconded by Mr. ~¢Hale, the ~oard
approved a rsquast ~rem ~r. and ~r~. David cra£n to allow two
sto~age ~heds to encroach within an eight £~et drainaga and
utility easement on Lets 1 and 2, Block B, Chesdin Heights~
Section One, subject to the execution of a license agreement.
{It is note~ a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed wit~ the
paper~ of this Board.]
Vote: Unanlmou~
7.D.IT.b. FROM VIR~TNI~ ELECTRIC AND BOWER COHBANY TO
approved a request from virginia Electric and Power Company
for an existinq pole line to encroach on a parcel of land
located approximately 1,200 feet eouth of Paces Ferry Road,
subject to fha e~cuti0n of a license agreement. (It is
noted a cop~ o~ th~ plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
93-669
CONSTRUCTION OOM~NY=__IN~OR~OR~T~D FOR WILLI~
RO~D %rATES LINE REHABILITATION PRO~ECT
On motion cf Mr. Colbert, ssmondsd by Mr. MoHale, the Board
awarded a sonetructlon contract to Ralph Eodge Construction
Company, Inoorp0ratedt the low bidder, in tho amount of
$~6,510~ for the Willi~ Road Water Linc Rehabilitation
FroJee~ (90-001IR) and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the n~ces~ary documents. (~t is noted fund~ for this
~rojest are available in the capital Improvement Budget.)
Vote: Unanimeu~
After brief discussion, on motion of Mr. colbert, seconded by
~ampstead ~laoe, ~ection 2, Project Number ~3-Q12~, ae
of lS inch oversized wastswater lines and authorized the
County Administrator to execute any necessary documents:
5~velop~r: Oliver D~ Rudy, Tra~tee under a certain
d~signat~d Stoney Glen W~t kgr~m~nt
Contractor: Castle Equipment Corporation
contract Amount: ~stimat~d Total - $5S,~15.75
- $ 9~464.6~
- $49,352.09
Total Estimated County Cost:
Wastewater (Oversizing)
(Refund th~u ~enne~tion~)
E~timated Developer Cost
Code~ (Over~izing)
District: Bermuda
vote: unanimsu~
On motion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by Nr. MoHalk, the Dcard
Project N~bar 93~006~, as follows, which project includes
lfn~s and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
Total Estimated County Cost:
Wastewater
(Refund thru connections)
Estimated Developer Cost
Code: (0versizing)
District: ~atcaca
L0ng~eadow Farms Associates,
incorporated
Piedmont Ce~etr~otion company,
Incorporated
Estimated Total - $64,19~.00
- $
- ~N-~72VQ-E4C
~01% VAN ~T~ ~ ROG~R~ ~N~ORPO~T~D BU~D~
0n ~o:ion of ~. Colbert, ~conded by ~r. ~cHale, ~e Board
approved a Wate~ extension contract for Phas~ T for
Waters and Roger=, Incorporated suilding, Contract Number 92-
1079, a~ follows, which project consists of 1~5 5.F. +- of
in~ offsite water lines and authorized ~e County
Administrator to e~ecute any necessary dec--eats:
Developer: Van Waters and Rogers, Incorporated
Contractor: Ly=tle Utilities, Incorporated
Contract ~ount: Estimated Total
Total Es%imated County cost:
Water (Offsite) ~ 1,444.85
(Refund thru connectionm)
Estimated Developer CQ~t $ 8,786.40
Code: (Offsite)
District:
Vote: Unanimou~
TRAINING BUILDTN~
On motion of Mr. Colbert, ~eoond~d by ~r. MeHale, ~ha Beard
authorized ~ha Chairman of the Board and th~ County
Administrator fie execute an easement agreement with virginia
Electric and Power Company for underground service to the new
Chesterfield County Bublie Safety Academic and Physical
Training Building. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed
With the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
7.D.21.b. WEST BRARCH LIBIL%~Y
On ~otion of Mr. Colbert, ~eccnded by ~r. HcEale, the Board
author/zed the Chairman e~ the Board amd the county
Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Virginia
~lectrio and Power Company ~or underground service to the
West B~anoh Library. (It is noted a copy of th= plat is
filed with the papers oS %his Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
7.D.22. ACCE~T~NCEN OF ~CELS OF L~ND
?.D.lZ.a. ALON~ SOUTH ~ROVIDENCE ROAD PROM L~E, INCORPORATED
On motion of Mr. Colbert, seconds~ by ~r. McHalo, the Board
a~oepted, on behalf of the County, the ¢onveyanc~ of 0.143
acres of land along Booth Providence Road from LBS,
Incorporated and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the necessary de~d. {It is noted a copy of the plat
is filed with the papo~ of thi~ Board.)
Vote: Unanimou~
93-671 I0/13/93
7.D.22,b, ALONG THE WE~T RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF IRONBRIDGE
ROAD FROM THE TRU~TRE~ O~ ~DUTRSIDE BAPTIST ~N~RC~
On motion cf Mr. Colbert, seconded by ~r. NcHale, the Board
aocepted~ on behalf of the County, the conveyance of 8.013
acres of land along the west right of way line of Xronbridge
Road (State Route 10) from the trustees of Southeide Baptist
Church and authorized th~ county Administrator to ~oute the
necessary deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed
with the papers of this Board,)
8. RE~ORTB
On motion ef Mr. Mc~ale, seconded by /~r. Barber, the Board
accepted the following reports:
Mr. Ramsay Dresented the Boa~d with a ~epo~t on t~e develcpe~
water and ~ewor contract~ o×eoutod by tho County
Administrator.
Mr. Ramsay presented the Board with m ~tatua r~pcrt on the
General Fund Balance; Reserve for Future capital Projects~
Di~triot Road and street Liqht Funds~ Lease Purchases~ and
School Board Agenda.
Mr. Ramsay stated the Virginia ~epartmen~ of Transportation
has formally notified the County of =~e acceDtanoe of the
following roads into the State Secondary System:
ADDITIOHS LENGTH
BUCKINGHAM ~ SECT~LON 3 - (Eff~mct~ve
~onte 1360 (01dbury Rca4) - From 0.08 mile Southwest
Route 1362 to 0.11 mile Northeast Route 13~ 0.19 Mi
Route 1362 {Southwick Boulevard) - From Route
3523 to Route 1360 0.06 Mi
BUCKINGHAM - SECTION 3 - ~Effective
Route 1360 (oldbury Road) - From 0.US mile Southwest
Route 13~2 to 0.11 mile Northeast Route 1360 0.19 Mi
Route 1~62 (Southwick Boulevard) - From Route
to ~oute 1360 0.06 Mi
ASCOT POINTE - {Effective 10-1-93]
Route 4485 (Paces Ferry Road) - From Route 144 to
6.~6 milo ~ast Route 144
Route 4456 (Heathstead Read) - Fram Route 44S5 te
0.10 milo South Route 448~ 0.10
Route 4487 (~eath~tead Co~t) - Fro~ RoUt= 4486
to 0.04 male East Route 4488 0.04 Hi
Route 4488 (Kentshire Lane) - Prom ~oute 4~SS to
0~07 ~ile South Route 4485
Route 4489 (Churchill Court) - From Ronte 4685 to
0.04 mile South ~o~te 4485 0.~4
Vots~ Onanimoa~
CO~E OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMEBDEDj FOR CONSULTATION
gONING APPEAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board
want into Executive Session pursuant to
344Ia) (?), Cede o~ Virginia, 1950, ss amended~
consultation with legal counsel regarding an appeal of a
Vote: Unanimous
On notion of Mr. MeHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Beard
adopted the following resolution:
W~EREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of
the Board and in accordance with the provisions of the
Virginia Freede~ ef Information Act; and
WEERFAS~ the Virginia Yreedom of In£ormatlen Act
e~fective July 1, 19~9 provides for certification teat such
E×ec~tive Session was conducted in conformity with law.
NOW, THEREFOR~ B~ IT RESCLVED~ the Board of
~ees hereby eertlfy that to the best of each me. bergs
knowledge, i) only public bu~in~ ~attexe lawfully exempted
from open meeting requirements undeY the Freedom of
Information Act w~re discussed in the Executive Session to
which this certification applie~, and
ii) only such public business matters as were identified
in th~ Motion by which the Executive Seauiam was cenvmned
wore hcard~ diemussed or considered by the Board. NO member
dissents from =his certification.
The Bosr~ being polled, the vote was as follows:
Mr. McHale : Aye.
Mr. Daniel : Aye.
~r. Colbert: Aye.
Kr. Barber : Aye.
~r. Warren : Aye.
DINNER MEETTN~ WTT~ RE~R~SEWTATIVE~ OF COUNTy COUNCIL
PTA'S
On motion of Mr. Colbert, meconded by Mr~ Barber, the Board
recessed to the Administration Building, Room 502, for a
dinne~ meeting w~th representati~e~ of thc County Council ef
Vote: Uusnimous
Representatives of the Cuunty Council of PTA'e met with the
Beard of Supervisors for a dinner ~eeting and staff pre,ended
a brief overview of local revenue projections and the School
budget target; the cumulative Capital Tmprove~ent Program
Reserve for schoolu; the local transfer to s~heel~ as percent
of qeneral property taxe~; scheduling a bond referendum; and
the possibility of proposing a meals tax on the referendum
with revenue g~nerated being designated for School capital
~rojects.
Ms. Gab Eobert$~ President Of the County Council of PTA'~
e×pr~ed appreciation for the opportunity to meet wi~h
Board to discuss the School'~ budqet target.
93-673 10/13/93
It was ganerally agreed to recess to the Public Meeting Room
to cnntinne the regularly scheduled meeting.
Reccnvening:
Mr. Warren introduaed Chief ~anem who gave the invocation.
11. PLEDOE O~ ALLR~I~NCE TO THE FLOC OF TEE UNITED STATES
AM~RiOA
Mr. Warren led the Pledge of Allegiance t0 =he Flag of the
United States of AmeriCa.
12. RESOLETIOE$ AND SPEGIAL RECOGKITIOMS
~r. Masden introduced Miss Andrea Ams and Miss Lydia Woods
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
years ago by Mr. Fred Day with the philosophy of promoting
physical conditioning, mental discipline, and a spirit of
teamwork and cooperation; and
W~EREA$, previous and current ~wimmer~ attainment of
national titles and reccgnitien is directly attributed to a
fifty week schedule of practice and conditioning; and
W~R~A$, Miss Andrea Arn~ and Mi~ Lydia Woods, a
Midlo:hian ~i~h School junior~ and ~ophnmora r~peot~vely~
have attained the title of ~aticnal 199~ Junior 01ymplo Duet
Champion~.
County Board cf Supervisors extends its congratulations to
the sport of ~ynchronized ~wlmmlng.
Supervisors, on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield
~uccess to M~ Andrea A~n~ M~ Lydia Wood~ and the
~riarwood Synchro Club.
Vote: Unanimous
and Miss Woods and congratulated them on their outstanding
acccmplislu~ants in the sp~rt of synu~hroni~ad swim,ming.
recognition and stated it is gratifying to see the
accomplishment~ of young p~r~onn acknowledged.
SCHOLASTIC ~CHIE~EMENTS
Fir. Hammer introduced Mr. Nicholas Loehr who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, th= following resolution was adopted:
W~EREAS, Mr. Nicholas Loehr i~ a ~enior at Midlothian
High School; and
W~EREA$, Nicholas is an outstanding student with keen
interest in math, statistics, and phy~ic~ and is a member of
~he Latin Club; the Latin Honor society; the National Honor
Society; Mu Alpha There (the Math Honor Society); the Science
Bowl Team~ and Battle of the B~ains; and
WHEREASt Nicholas has received numerous awards including
First ?lace in th~ Latin Essay Contest; ~tats winner in the
Virginia Math League Contest; and a recipient cf the
Dar~outh Book Award; and
of approximately ~70 ~tudent~; and
WHEREAS, ~ichol~s scored 160 on his Preliminary
schola~is Aptitude ~est (~$AT) and 1600 on his SAT~ which
are perfect scores; and
W~R~A~, nationwide, approximately ~8 million students
W~EREAS, Nichola~ wa~ on~ of only ~igh% students in ~he
students to score perfectly on the SAT; and
W~R~A$, after graduation, Nichslas is planning to
physics, or computer science.
Nicholas Loehr on h~ outstanding scholastic achievsmsnts and
~L~. Barber presented the executed r~olution to Mr. Loehr,
accompanied by his father, cengrat~l&ted him on his
outstanding scholastic achievements, and wished him well in
his future endeavors.
12.E. RECO~NI~I~ ~OY S¢OUT~ ~ON ATTAINiEG KANK OF EAGL~
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WEER~AS. the Boy Scouts of ~erica wa~ incorporated by
Mr. Willia~ D. Beyce On February s~ 1910; and
9~-575
WHEREAS, the Bey Scouts of America was founded to
promote citizenship training,, personal development, and
fitness of individuals; and
WHEREAS, after earning ~t least twenty-one merib badges
in m troop, carrying out a gervlce project beneficial to his
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WH~.S, ~-r. Patrick Jon Kenney, Troop 900, sponsored by
of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal cf Eagle
individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHeReAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting,
learning the les~onm of responsible citizenship, and priding
himself on the great accomplishments of his county, Patrick
congratulations ts Mr. Patrick Jon Kenney and acknowledges
the ~ood fortune of the County to have such an outstanding
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. ~arber presented the executed resolution to Mr. Kenney~
accompanied by members of his family, and congratulated him
1~,E,2, MR. JASON B. TOMLIN~ON
On motion of the ~oard, the following resolution was adopted:
WHeReAS, the ~oy Scouts of America was incorporated by
Mr. Willia~ D. Boyc~ on Fub~uary 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to
promote citizenship training, personal development, and
fitness of individuals; and
WHERE, 9, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide variety of f~elds, serving in a leadership
in a troop, carrying out a gervice project benef~c£al to hi=
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and 5aw; and
WHEREA~, Mr. Jason B. Temlinsen, Troop ~97, sponsored hy
Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, has accomplished these
high ~tandards of commitment and has r~aohed the long-sought
goal of Eagle scout whio~ is received by less than two
percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement;
and
learning the la,sene of responsible citizenship, and priding
himself on the great accomplishments of him County, Jason
in~eed a member of e new generation of prepared young
clt~zen~ of when we can all be v~ry proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of ~uporvi~ors hereby
co~gratulations to Mr. Jason B. Tomlinson and acknowledges
the good fortune of the County to have ~ueh an outstanding
young man as one of its citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
Tomlinson, accompanied by members of his family, and
congratulated hi~ On his o~tstandi~g achievement.
~r, ~a~d~n introduced Manager ~d Eb~rl~ Coach~ D~nni~
~cDenald, Paul Swen~on, and Pat Pantlu~, and team playe~D who
wers pre~ent to receive th~ re~olutiQn~.
On motion of the Board, th~ following resolution was adopted:
~H=a~AS, participation in littl~ league baseball has
lonq been an integral part of Chesterfield County's physioal
and e~etional d~velopment for children; and
the auguenot ~a=ienal Liable League All
1993 all star play with an 11~2 record;
the Hu~enot Notional Little Lea~e All Star
Team finished
W~EREAS,
Team won ~he
record; and
WHEREAS, the Huguenot National Little League All Star
Team played a total of ei~h~ game~ in five ~ays in the
grueling heat of ~uly to finish State runnerup at Woodbridge,
virginia~ with a 6-M record in the virginia thirteen year-old
division; and
Team conmiotmd of Manager Ed Eberle; Ceachem Dennis MCDo~Mld,
~aul Swenson, and Pat Pontius; players Joey Leadb~tter, Jason
Mannix, Jeff Lessin, ~ick Davis, Matthew McDonald, Jim
Swenson, Chris Gerrity, Stsve Lends, Tra=y Towles, Collin
Moore, Josh Honeyoutt, Jeff Grant, Brad Gregg, and Rob Hale,
and their families; and
WHEP~EAS, ~e Huguenot National Littl~ League Ail Star
T¢~m'~ manager, coache~, parents, and players showed a
tremendous amount of pride and oommiPmen~ in their hard work
and the never-~ive-up attitude they each dimplayed; and
~EAS, ~e Huguenot National Little League Ail Star
Team was continually uomm~nded throu~hou= =he Dimtrlct 5 and
State play by opponents and tournament director~ for
d~Dlay~ng the ~rue m~r~t of ~port~man~h~p, team work, and
fair play.
~0W, THER~FOR~ FE IT RESOLVED, =hat the Chesterfiel~
County Boa~d of SuDe~vi~o~ does ~e~eby rucogniz~ ~=
~uguenot Na=ional Little League All Star Team for its
outstanding achievements and repr%sentation of themmelv~m,
their parents, their lea~e, and Ches~erfleld County.
~D, BE IT F~THER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, cn behalf of County citizens,
doe~ ~ereby co~nd t~e ~ugue~ot "M~les" for their splendid
sportsmanship and hard work and e~prems their best w~sbes for
Vote: Unaninoum
93-677 10/13/93
Mr. Barber Dresented the executed resolutions to Mr. Eberte,
Mr. McDomald, Mr. Sweneon, Mr. Pontius, and the team player~
and congratulated each of them on their outstanding
achievements and sportsmanship, and wished them continued
the Muguenot Little Lea~p/e, for t/~e recognition.
Fir. Masden introduced ~r. chip Bailey, Mr. Butch Ledfor4,
the team players who were present to receive the resolutions.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
Muguenot Major Girl~ All-Star T~am; and
WHEREAS, thi~ w~ the b~ginning of an out~tanding bl~nd
· portsman~hip and competitive play; and
WHEREAS, the Huguenot Major Girls All-Star Team won the
very challenging District 5 championship ~hi~h oon~i~ted of
and Henrico; and
~q~ERBAS~ the Huguenot Major Girls All-Star Team finished
as the State runner-uD after defeating team~ from the
in a hard-fought nine-inning battle to the Virginia
distinguished itself ~ith pride and sportsmanship and
represente~ ~he Huguenot Little League which has been in
County Doard of Supervisors does hereby recognize the
Huguenot Major Girls All-Star Team for its outstanding
District 5.
their best w~sh~ fe~ continued
Vote: Unani~o~
Mr. Ledford, and the team Dlayers, congratulated them on
F~. Baile~ expressed appreciation to the players~ families
10t13/93
12.~. RE~0~NI2IN~ MR. JOHN W. ~DDILL FOR NIE SERVI~ TO THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY '
Mr. Stith introduced Mr. John W. Waddill who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following re~olution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Industrial Development
Authority is to promote industry and develop trade by
inducing manufacturing, commerce, industry, and governmental
~EREAS, this Authority reviews the portfolio of
industries which apply for 10w interest funding to £inanoe
mew capital facilities, addition~, or renovatione to exieting
facilities in che~terfiel~ County; and
WEEREA$, Mr. John W. Waddill served with distinction on
the Chesterfield Industrial Development Authority from
February 10, 1985 to June 30, 1993; and
WHEREAS, ~Ir. Waddill ha~ faithfully and diligently
performed the duties and discharged the responsibilities
incumbent upon a member of the Authority; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Waddill demonstrated leadership,
sensitivity, and commitment to th~ i~ue~ b~for~ ~he
Authority while serving on the Board.
NOW, T~EREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
appreciatio~ to Mr. John W. Wsddill for repre~emting the
County of Chesterfield while serving as a member on Phc
Industrial Development Authority.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution be appropriately prepared and presented to ~r.
Waddill.
Vote: Unanimous
~r. ~¢Eal¢ pre~ented the executed refolution to ~r. Waddill
and expressed appreciation lor his service to the Industrial
D~v~lopm~nt Authority.
INSTALLATION EXCELLENCE
Mr. Ramsay expressed appreciation to Captain K. W. Lippert
for the ~upport the ~eDer~l D~fen~e Supply Center (DGSC) has
~h0w~ the C0~nty and aekn0wledged DGSC as a ~ajor employer of
the County.
Chief Eanes introduced K. W. Lippart, Captain, SC, USN,
Commander, Defense General Supply Center (DGSC), and
presented a brief overview cf Captain Lippert*s experience,
expertise, and c~/alifications.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Defense General Supply Center (DGSC) has
been recognized by the Department of Defense with the
Conunander-ln-Chiefs' Annual Award for Installation Excellence
for outstanding and innovative efforts by its people; and
WHEREAS, this is the second time in the last three years
that DGSC has been so honored; and
93-679 10/13/93
.... !,.L I .~J L I !,
items and services more than 8~000 customers on an average
day w~th annual sales An ]992 of ~978 millions and
WHEREA$~ the center provides repair parts for more than
909 active major weapon systems, including tho Air ~orees' B-
lB Bomber and F-16 Fiqhtinq Falcon aircraft; tile
Trident submarine; the F-14 Tomcat fighter; ships like the
USS Nimitz) the Army's Apache Helicopter~ the M-109 HowitzerS
the ~-1 tank; r_he Patriot missile system; the aarine Corps'
Harrier; and the Amphibious Assault Vehicle and Light
vehicle; and
WH~R~S, DGSC, through innuvativm initiatives, has
implemented a program identifying quality vendor~; initiated
electronic data int~rchang~ w~th~n the Department of Defansm
to provid~ just-in-t~me inventory support; implemented
quality value contracting which allows customers the ability
~o $~le~t products from a menu of ~imilar ~ompetitively
p~iced co~ercial products; and in,flared business process
oriented entrepreneurial work groups called pro4uot
which e~rcis~ budget authoTity over a major portion of the
wi~h~s to publicly reoognize D~PC for r~ce~vlng the
Commander-in-Chiefs~ Award for Installation Exc~ll~nce~
out of the last three years, and for their innova=ire,
oontinuous process improvement Rnd managerial ingenuity-
NOW, TH~EOR= ~ IT R~$OLV~O, that the Chesterfield
County Board of ~upervisors publicly recognizes and
congratulates our goo~ neiphborm -- the hard working
employee~ at the Defense General Supply Center -- who are
co~it~ed to ~m~rov~ng the ~erv~c~ they provide to
Department of Defense; the federal government; and for
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, ~at a cody o~ this
resolution be appropriately prepared and pre~ented
Vote: Unanimou~
~r. McHale presented the executed re~olution to Captain
Li~pert and expressed appreciation for his continuing efforts
in improvinq the services DGSC provide.
captain Lippert expressed appreciation~ on behalf of the
umployee~ of DG$C, for the recognition and ~tat~d the
employees at DGSC are oo~itted to the exoellence of
supporting th~ a~ed forc~ worldwide and to the
iM.D. RECOGNIMING ~RS. DOROA8 YEAGEH FOR HER DEDICATION
SWIPT ~REK~DDLE~OL
Mr. Masden introduced ~rs. Dorcas Yeager who was present to
receive the resolution.
on motion of the Bsar~, the ~cllowing resolution was adap~ed:
~=E=A~, ~wi~t Creek Ki0dle school lacked facilities for
track amd field sports; nnd
WHEREAS, the co~u~nnity, parents, and students felt +~here
wa~ a ne~d to pull togef~her to raise the funding neede~ for
facility improvement~ and
W~R~AS, the community set their goal to create the
"Field of Dr~a~s' a~d Hrs. Dorcas Yeager volunteered to
spearhead the project; and
WEER~AS, a two-year project became a reality on
September 15, 1993, with a dedication and official opening of
tho field; amd
WEEREAS, Mms. Yeager's unselfish volunteer commitment
was recognized by the school administration in their
proposing to na~e the complsx in her honor; and
WEER~S, Mrs. Yeager recognized the continuoum support
from ~mterfimld Co~ty government, school Board,
bumimes~e~, parentm, teacherm, and mtndmnts that raised the
$57,~0 to complete gh~ project; and
~R=A$, ~rs. Yeager's vision brought together the team
~rou~m to achieve ~elr goal.
NOW, THMR=FOR~ ~ IT ~SOLVED, thmt the Chesterfield
Yeager for her tireless efforts
and soccer/football field at Swift Cre~k Mi441~ school.
~. Warren presented =he ex~cuted ~e~olution
accompanied b~ members of her family, and expressed
appreciation for her tine and ~ff~rts
of the "Field of Dream~" at Swift C~eek ~iddle School.
~. Yeaqer expressed appreciation to ~e Board for the
recognition and to those w~o supported th~ "Field of Dreams"
p~ojeot. She further stated she feels the "Field of Dreams"
project will serve as a role model for others who desire to
improve the County'~ ~chools and their ~o~munities.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution w~s adopted:
~R~A~, d~cent, safe, and affordable housing is =he
built; and
%75EREAS, without the security of a home, men and wsmen
find it difficult to hold a job, children struggle in school,
and family units are often separated; and
W~EREA$, deteriorating housing, ~nadequate plumbing, and
overcrowding threaten the health and safety of Virginia's
househelda and diminish the economic vitality of Virginia's
W~RFA$, Virginians with special needs for assessi'bility
or ~uppsrtive services have additional difficulty finding
~dequate affordmble housing; and
WI~ER~AS, the dream of d~nt affordable kon~ing will
only become a reality through stron~ community ~upport and
~OW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, tha~ %he chos~er£ield
County Roard of ~up~rvi~or~ r~co~rnize~ October 1993, ee
"Affordable Housln~ Awaronem~ Month."
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Warren presented the executed resolution to Mm. Jane
Carter, Director Of Housing, an~ expressed appreciation for
her efforts in the County providing affordable housinq.
12.K. REOOGNISIN~ OCTOBER, ~993 AS "Q~ALI~Y HONTH~
Mr. ~t~g~aior introduced ~. Ko,th W~ne, Preaidant of the
Quality Council of Greater Richmond; ~ Don Knud~on~
Director of Quali~y A~urane~ for Philip Morris; ~r. Roger
Scott, Quality Manager of Waldueller and Co-chairman of
Membership for the Quality Council of Greater RicBmond; and
Mr. George Disberger, lea~er of th~ ~%merican Society for
Quality Control and an employee of DuPont; who were present
to receive the resolutions.
On motion af ~he ~oard, th~ following resolution was adopted:
W~EREAS, a co~itment to excellence in man=Seceding,
service, and government iD essential to 0~ ~ation'~ well
bsing; and
~=AS, uv=r the ye=rs, virginians ~ave sho~ ~reat
personal pride and ~nterest in d%veloping quality goods ~nd
~ervioes and in promoting a high standard ~ ~cellence in
both the public and private s~ctors; and
WHEREAS, from the small,st to the largest manufacturing
and servic~ orga~i~ation~ in the Commonwealth of v~rg~n~a,
quality i~ a major concern; and
WHER~S, the Quality Council o~ 0teeter Richmond, ~
RichmOnd section of the ~zrioan Sooiety fo~ Quality control~
and the Metropolitan Richmond Chamber of Commeroe ~re ~ngag~d
in a campaign to make citizens of central Virginia aware that
total ~a!ity i~ e~=ntia! tu th~ D~oduotivity,
comDetitivenes~, and profitability of our econo~y; and
educators, and govmrnmen~ off~clal= must wark together to
promote excellence in the public and priv=te sectors; a~d
~R~AS, the Board of Supervisors in Fsbruary, 199~,
~ire=~ed %h~ County A~ini~trator to d~v=lo~ an~ initial= an
ongoing total quality improv~snt effort aimed at reinventing
th~ way Ch~s~erfleld County government serves its ~ustomers;
~R~AS, many County employees have already joined the
critical %raining in the values and practices of quality~ and
gover~ent has begun; and
~EREAS, th~ County ha~ developed ongoing partnerships
1993 as "Quality M~nth" in ~e~terfield County and calls its
~ign&ficanc~ to the at=~ntion of all its citizens.
Mr. Warren presented the sxecute~ resolutions to ~r. Wine,
Mr. Knudeon, ~r. $oott~ and Mr. DisDerger and expressed
appreciation for their contributions and efforts i~
implementing quality improvement in the County.
14.A. TO ~ONSIDE~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TEE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF CBE~TERFIELD~ 1978. AS ANE/4DED. ~.~/~ENDIN~
TAX RELIE~ ~OR TH~ ELDERly, AND DISABLED
Mr. Micas stated this date and time ha~ b~en advertised for a
~ublic hearing to consider an ordinance relating ~e real
property tax relief for the elderly a~ disabled. He further
stated new State Law requires that any tax relief plan must
now e~lude from the q~alifi~aticn formula the income of a
relatiue or relatiYe's
care ~or the owner to prevent the owner from having to
~ermanently reside in a Dhyeioal Or mental care facility and
the owner has not transferred more than $9,000 in assets
with0~t adequate oonaideration within three years prior to or
after the relative moved into the residence.
Mr~ Daniel ~ta~ed he has received numerous phone calls
~equa~ting relief f~om trash or garbage fees for the elderly
and requested the County :o consider this issue during the
Mr. Warren stated he umderstands th~ concerns mxpre~ed by
the elderly and indicats~ he would support con~iderinq this
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against this
ordinance.
On motion of ~Ir. Colbert, seconded by ~r. McNale, the Board
adopted the followinq
A~ ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE COD~ OF TN= COUNTY
OF CH~STERFIELD~ 1978~ AS ANENDED~ BY A~ENDING
REAL ESTATE TAX EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN ELDERLY PERSONS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of ~up~r¥iuors of
Chester£i~ld County:
(1) That ~ec~ion 6-15 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, a~ amended, is amended and reenacted to
~otwith~tanding any other p~oviaion of this chapter, the
dwelling and up to one
situated ~ubjeot to r~al estate taxation under t~is chapter
may be temporarily exenpted from ~uch tax when any such
property is owned by and occupied as the sole dwelling o~ a
per, on not less than ~ixty-fiYe (~) years of a~e or a person
who is determined
define~ in section ~-17.1, hereunder, subject to the
following re~triotion& and conditions:
(a) That the total combined incum= during the preceding
d~elling living therein and owner's relativ~ who
live in the dwelling dues not e~ceed thirty-seven
thousand nine hundred ninety-nine dollars
($37,~99.00); prcvided~ that the first forty-one
93-583 10/13/93
hundred dollars ($4,100.00) of income of each
r~latlve, other than spouse, of the owner, who is
living in the dwelling shall not be included in
such total.
Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this ssction, if
a person qualifies for an exemption un,er this
section, and if the person can prove by ~l~ar and
convincing cwidence that the person's physical or
mental health nas deteriorated to the point that
the only alternative to permanently residing in a
hospital, nursing home, convalescsnt home or other
facility for physical or mental care is to have a
relative move in and provide care £or the person,
and if a relative doe~ th~n move in for that
purpose, then none of the income cf ths relative or
cf the relative's spouse shall be counted
the income limit, provided the owner of the
$5,980 without adequate consideration witt~in a
three-year period prior to or after the relative
moves into ~uch residence.
(c) That the net combined financial worth, including
interest, as of Decsmbsr ~! of the immediately
preceding calender year, of the owners, and of the
spouse of any ewner, excluding
dwellin~ and one {1) acre of lend upon which it
situate4, do~s not ~×ce~d ~ev~nty-fiv~ thou=and
dollars
(d) Th= fact that persons who are otherwise qualified
residing in hospitals, nursing home~, convalescent
homes or othsr facilities for physiual or mental
care for extended periods of time shall not be
ccn~trued to ~san that the real e~tata for which
tax exemption is sought does not continue tc be the
estate is not used by er leased to others for
That this ordinance shall becom~ effective January
Vote:
~OUNT¥ OF CHESTERFIELD. 1978. A8 AMENDED. BY AMENDIN~
AND ADDING SEOTION 7,~-14.~ RELATIN~ TO EROSION
~r. ~ieas stated this date and time has been advertised for a
and s~diment control. He furthsr statsd the 1993 session of
the General Assembly ad~pted sty=tel changes to State erosion
control law that requires the County's ordinance to be
the changes including county staf~ being required to obtain
COmp~t~y certifications from the State; requiring that all
land-disturbing aosivity undertaken for the construction of
longer being exempt from erosien control regulation; and
obtained an erosion and sediment control plan being
ordinaace.
On motion of Hr. Daniel, ~econded by Mr. Barber, the Board
adopted the fallowing ord{nanoe:
AR ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTy
OF CSESTERFI~LD, 197~, AS A~E~ND~D, BY AMENDING
AND REENACTING SECTIONS 7.2-1, 7.2-2, 7.2-1~, AND
7.2-16.1 AMD ADDIN~ SECTION 7.2-t4.2 ~BLATING TO
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
BE IT ORDAINED by the Beard of S~pervisor~ of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Chapter 7.2 af the Coda of the County of
Chesterfield, ~978, as amended, is amended and reenacted to
r~ad as follows:
Bec. ?.2-~. Definitions.
The £ollowing terns, when~vsr used or referred
this chapter, ~hall have the respective meanings set forth
below, unless the ¢on:axt clearly raguiras a contrary meaning
oeo
Certified insneotor: An e~ployee o~ agent Of the County
who (i) holds a certifioate of oompete~oe from the Virginia
soil and Water Conservation Board in the area of
insp=otion or {ii) is snroll~d in bhe Board's training
p~ogram for p~oject inspection and successfully completes
such proguam within one year after enrollment.
Certified plan reviewer: An employee or agent of the
county who (i) holds a certificate of competence from the
Virginia Soil and water Conservation
plan review, (ii) i~ enrolled in the Board's training program
within one year after enrollment, or (iii) is licensed as a
professional engineer, architect, cartlfied landscape
architect or land su~-veyor pursuant to Article 1 (§ 5&.l-~O0
et seq.) of Chapter 4 of Title 54.1, Code of Virginia, 1950,
Certified D~e~a~ administrator: An employee or agent
Of the County who (i) holds a oertifieate of oo~p~tsno~ fram
the Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Board in the area of
~rogram administration ur (ii} is enroll~d in %ha ~oar~'s
Erosion Imuact Area: An area of land not a~cclated
onto neighboring properties or into state waters. This
definition ~hall not apply to any lot or parcel of land of
ten thousand (10, o00) ~quar~ f~et or la~$ ~e~ for
residential pareses or to shorel~ne~ where the erosion
0 0 a
Land-Disturbie~ ActivitY: Any land change which may
result in soil erosion from water or wind and the movement of
~di~ent~ into water~ or onto lands in the county or adjacent
juri~dlct~on~, ~nclud~ng but not lime,sd to clearing,
grubbing, grading, excavating, transporting and filling of
land, and the in-tailing of water, ~ewar, ga~ or c~l llnss,
drainage pipet and ~torm =ewers, unleas occurring on a hard-
surfaced road, street or sidewalk; except, t~at t~e tern
shall not include any of th~ f~llowing:
o o o
(3] Septic tank lines or drainage fields
lines or drainage iield~:
a. Are located in the chesapeake Bay Preservation
Areas described in chapter 21 or chapter 21.1;
b. Ar~ included in an overall plan for land
disturbing activity relating to
of a building to be served by a septic tank
o o o
(5) Tilling, planting or harvesting of agricultural,
ope=ations, inoluding engineering operations as
follows: construction of terraces, terrao~
check dam~, desilting basins, dikes ~ pond~ ~
~itches, ~tri~ cropping, li~ter furrowing, oontour
cultivating, contour furrowing, land drainage and
land irrigation.
(7) Disturbed land ~reas ~or uses located in the
chapter Zl or ¢~ap~er 21.1 w~io~ are less than
twenty-five hundred (~,~00) square fa~t in size and
thousan~ (10,000) s~are feet in size which are
located outside of such areas.
and electric poles and other kinds of posts or
Doles.
E~erg~n~y work to protect life, limb or property
and emergency repairm; provided, that if ~s /and-
disturbing activity would ~ave required an
~rosxon aD~ s~im~nt uontrol plan if th~ activity
were not ~n emeTgency, then the land ~rea disrobed
shall be shaped and established in accordance with
t~e requirements of the Virgini~ Erosion and
Sediment Control Handbook.
(10) ~xploration or drilling for oil and gas including
the w~lt ~i=~, roads, feeder lines, and off-site
dlspo~al areas which ~erve the well ~ite.
Shore erosion control project= on tidal water~ when
th~ Drojectm are approved by local wetlands boards,
the Nar~n~ R~curc~ Co~issiOn Or th~ U.S. A~y
Corps of Englneer~.
93-686 I0/13/93
(12) Agricultural engineerinq operations, including but
not limited to the construction of terraces,
terrace 0utl=ts, Check dame, desilting basin~,
dikes, ponds not required t0 comply with =he
provisions of the Dam Safety Act, Code of Virginia,
~ec%ion 10.1-604 et seq., ditches~ strip cropping,
lister furrowing, contour cultivating, contour
furrowing, land drainage and land irrigation.
(I3) Installation, maintenance or repair of any
underground public utility lines when such activity
occurs on an exlst~ng hard-surfaces ~oad, ~treet or
sidewalk provided such land-disturblng activity is
confined to the area of the road, street er
sidewalk which is hard surfaced.
Sec. 7.2-2. AeDroval of land-disturbino aetiv_'~%ips..
It shall also be unla~£ul ~o engage in land-dis=urbing
activity when there is a revoked or invalid lend-disturbance
permit on the project. At all times may ~erson engaginq in
land-disturbing activity shall comply with the minimum
s~andards.
o o o
Sec. 7.~-14. Inspection~ not,ce of deficiencies.
(a) All applications fob land disturbance permits
shall expressly reserve a right of entzy sufficient tu permit
the environmental engineer or his de,ignored agent to enter
upon property at all reasonable tim~s for Lh~ p~rDsse of
making in~pections to determins whethe~ the requirements of
~his chapter er the applicable approved erosion and sediment
control plan are being complied with. The o~ner~ permittee
or person responsible for carrying out the plan shall be
given an opportunity to accompany the inspectors.
o o o
(d) Upon receipt of a sworn complaint cf a substantlal
violation of thio ohapts~ from the environmental engineer,
the county administrator may~ ~n conjunction with or
subsequent to a notice to comply as specified in subsection
land-d~sturbin~ activities permitted on the cite be ~topped
if land-disturbing a~tivities have Commenced without an
approved 91an as provided in section 7.2-2, requiring that
all of th~ land-disturbing activities be stopped until an
approved plan and land-disturbance permit have b~es obtained
and properly implemented. W~ere t~ noncompliance is causing
or is in imminent danger o~ causing harmful erosion of lands
er sediment deposition in water within the ~ate~hed~ of the
county or where the land-dlsturbing activities have commenced
without an approved plan or a land disturbance permit, such
an order may be issued only after the permittee has failed to
comply with such a notice to comply. The order shall be
served ~n the same manner as a notice to comply, and shall
remain in e£fec~ far e period cf seven (7) days from thc date
of servio~ pending application by the environmental engineer
for appropriate relief to th~ Circuit Court of Chesterfield
County. tf the alleged violator has not obtained an approved
plan and a ]and dimturbanc~ p~rmit within ~ven (7) day~ from
the date of service of the order, the county administrator
may issue an order to the owner raquirln~ that all
.................. IL ............ J ........ L .............. J I II ..
~en~true~ien and other work on the site, other than
corrective mea~ure~, be ~tepped until an approved plan and a
land-disturbance permit have been obtained. Such an order
~hall De served upo~ the owner by r~gi~tered or certified
mai] to the address specified in the permit applluatien or in
Of ar order to the Circuit Cour~ of Chesterfield County. Any
person who vlolmtes or fails, neglects er refuses to obey an
order issuer by the county administrator may be compelled in
a proGssding i~stitut~d in the Circuit Court of Chesterfield
County to obey the order and to comply therewiV2~ by
injunction, mandamus or e~he~ appropriate remedy. Upon
completion and approval cf the corrective aetion~ the order
Sss. 7.2~14.~. Certification Recuired.
(a) =ff~e=ive one fl} year from the date of the
adoption of this SeCtio~ ~o erozio~ and z~dime~t control
plan shall be approved until it is approved by a ¢~rti£ied
plan reviewer; all inspections of land-disturbing activity
shall be conducted by a certified inspector; and t~e County's
~nvir0nmental ~ngi~ser~mg Department ~halI at all times
contain among ~te staff et least one (1) uerti£ia~
administrator, one (1) certifie~ p~aD ~eviewer, and one
certified project in,petter.
(bi Any p~son who holds a certificate of competence
from the Virginia soil and Water Conservation Bo~rd in the
area of plan review, project &dminimtration er.
a~ini~tration which wa~ attained prior to the adoption of
the mandatory certification provisions of section 10.1-
~61-1(A)~ Code of Virginia, 19~0, as amended, shall be 4e~m~d
to b~ certified in that area of certification.
(a) Any violation of the provi~ion of thi~ chapter
shall be deemed an infraction and shell be punishable by a
civil p~nalty of on~ hundred dollar~ ($100.00) ~xc~pt that
the civil penalty for uommencement of land-disturbln~
activiti~ without a~ appr0ve~ plan as provided i~ section
7.2-2 shell bs one thousand dollars
(b) Each day during which any violation of t_ha
provision~ of this chapter is found to have existed shall
constitute a separate offen~e. ~owev~T! in no event shall
any such violation arising from the ~ame set of
fao~e he charged mo~e f~eg~e~tly than once in any te~-day
period, nor shall a ~eries of ~uch violationn arising from
the ~ame ~et of operative facts result in civil penalties
which exceed a total of three thousand dollars
except that a series of violations arls~ng from the
con~nencement of land-disturbing ~¢tivitie$ without an
approved plan for any site shall not result ~m pansltie~
which exceed a total of t~n thousand dollars
(£) Upon request of =he environmental engineer, the
county attorney shall take legal action to enforce the
provisions of Cede of Virginia, ~hapber 5, arbiole 4 of title
10.1. Upon request of the virginia Division of Conservation
and R~creation, bivisien of ~oil and water Conservation, the
attorney general shall take appropriate l~gal action on
behalf to the board to enforce the provisions of Code of
Virginia, chapter 5, articl= 4 of titl= I0.1.
That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon adoption.
Vote: Unanimous
t4.C. TO CONSIDER ~N ORDInaNCE TO /~4END THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF C~ESTERFIELD. Z97B. $~_.AMENDED, BY ADDIN~
Mr. Micas ~tated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing to oonsider an ordinance relating to wild or
exotic animals. He further stated the Caunty carrently does
not have an ordinance whish restricts ownership of venomous
snakes or other wild animals and adoption of ~h~ proposed
ordinance will preclude wild animalm such am wolves, foxes,
conditional use for an outdoor recreational facility i~
of the ordinanc~ tc remov~ the animal from the County.
relating to wild or ~xoti¢ animale.
There was brief discussion as to whether the requirement in
the proposed ordinance to obtain a conditional use for an
out,ocr r~or~ati~n~l faGility relate~ %o a past zoning
request from Mr. Jim Andclin.
D~ni~l, seconded by Mr. ~eHale, for ~he Board to adopt the
following ordinance:
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section ~-~.~ of the Code of th~ County of
Nc person shall keep ~r permit to bm kept a~y ~ild or
exotic animal as a pet. A wild or exotic animal shall mean
mquirrel, fox, leopard, panther, tigsr, lien, lynx or any
other warm-blooded animal, poisonous snake or tarantula which
can normally ba found in the wil~ state or any other member
of crocodilian, including but not limited to alligators,
cap=ivi~y and which never ~ave ~nown the wild shall he
excluded from this definition. No per$o~ shall keep or
permit to be kept on his premises any wild or exotic animal
for display or for exhibition purposes, whether ~ratultously
or for a flee. This section shall not be construed to apply
to performing animal exhibitions, circuses, veterinary
clinics or outdoor recreational facilities which have proper
Commonwealth cf Virginia. In no case, kowevsr, shall such
wild or exotic animals be exhibited or displayed in such a
or otherwise come in direct physical contact with such
guilty of a Class ~ misdemeanor.
<l) Thim m~ction mhall be effective sixty (60) days
from the date of adoptian.
Vote: Unanimous
APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTHENT OF HOU$IN~ aND
~NER~LL¥ ~LONG THE JEFFER80~ DAVIS HIGHWAY CORRIDOR
Mr. Jacobsen stated this date and time ha~ been
for a public hearing to consider approval of the mubmim~ien
of an enterprise zone application for tko Jefferson Davis
Corridor. ~e pre~ented a brief overview of the Jefferson
Davis Highway Enterprise Zone and reviewe~ the objective
an enterprise zone; proposed local incsntives for the
Mr. McEale stmt~d presently the area qenerates $300,000 cf
demignatiom will g~nerate an increase in invemtment in the
~o one came forward to speak in favor of or against this
ordinance,
Mr. McHale expressed appreciation to ~taff and
representatives from the Jefferson Davis Highway Association
for develoDing an application that encourages development,
but at the sa~e time, did not give new Dusinesses an unfair
advantage over existing businesses.
Mr. McHale then made a motion, sec0nde4 by Mr. Daniel, for
the Board to authorize the Count~ A~minlstrator tc ~ubmlt an
application to th~ Virginia D~partm~nt of Housing ~nd
Community Development far enterprise zone designation along
the Jefferson Davis Corridor b~tw~n th~ Richmond Corporate
limits and Route 10. (It is noted copies cf mape of the
propos=d zone, specific recommended incentives, financial
analysis of the incentives, an im9lementation char= of the
incentives, and businemm scenarios outlining dollar benefits
of incantlves are filed with the DaDerm of this Board.}
Vote: Unanimous
ROAD EXTENSION FROM OLD LkNE BOUTK TO THE PROPOSED
NORTH/SOUTH ~RTERI~L ALO~ THE ABANDONED RAILROAD
RIGHT OF WAy
Mr. Stinh s=ate~ ~his date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an amendment to the
County Thorcuohfare Plan and Cheater Villaoe Plan ts consider
the deletion of the Hopkins Read Extension and East-West
Collector,
~Ir. Brian Murphy referenced a recent letter he sent to the
Heard regarding alternatives to the ~lan and requested the
Board to consider remanding this issue to the Planning
Commission for further roview.
Pir. Rudy Hawkins s~mted he resides in Lakewood Parms$ that he
is opposed to the current Plan; and e~rpressed concern~
He re~u~t~d the Board to ~ema~d the issue ~o the Planning
Mr. Tom Tennill~ stated he is oD~osed ~o the Thoreuo~f&re
~lan; that he f~els othor proposals need to be studied; and
tha~ ~ho Thoroughfare Plan will not benefit citizens except
those who ro~i~o i~ Chester. Ko expresse~ noncoms relative
~o the Plan as it relates to an additional intersection at
Centralia Road and creation of the intersection generating,
commercial development; ~hat if the Plan is approved, it
should not impact the residential community of C~ntralia; and
requested the Board to review the issue further.
Mr. Paul W. Jenkins expressed concerns relative to the amount
of time and money that has been spent on this issue and the
additional traffic hazards the Plan will create. He stated
he feels Kopkins Road should be routed another way and is
opposed tc eliminating Hopkina Road.
~a being ~o o~e els~ to address this issue~ the public
Mr. Me,ale stated when the Board sent ~his issue to the
Planning Co~u~i~sion, they requested the CommZssion to address
the alignment of Hopkins Road. He further stated M~. Brian
Murphy is outside of those terms of reference and he feels
the suggested recommendations should be taken into
consideration, therefore, he would support remanding the
issue to the Planning Commission to consider these and other
recommendations voiced from this pubBlc input protegE.
the Board to remand to the Plannin~ Cemmisaien, for further
review an~ recommendatien'~ an amendment to tko C~esterfield
Co~ty Thoroughfare Plan and Chester Village Plan. elements
of the Chesterfield County Comprehensive Plan, to consider
deletion of, or alternatives to, the Hopkin~ Road ~xt~nsion
east-west collector extending fro~ Hopkins Road extension
east to tbs north/south arterial along the abandoned railroad
right of way; and for the review to include the su~gegtlons
Vote: Unanimous
14,F, TO CONSIDER TH~ MIDLOTHi~/HU~ENOT/ROBIOUS RO~ ;~REA
PLAN, AN AHEMDM~T TO THH 1986 NORTHERN AREA LAND USE
~ TR/~NSPORT~TION PL~, F~-~T OF THE COUNTY'S
~OMPREMENSIVE PLAN
Mr. Glenn Larson, Chief of Comprehensive Planning, ~tated
this da~e and ~ime has been advertised for a public hearing
to consider the Midlothtan/ee~uenot/Rmbiuus Road Ar~a Plan.
He presented a brief overview of the Plan and shate~ ~uring
the dav~lopment of this Plan, more than 200 notices were sent
~e ~usinmsses~ preper~y owners, and neighborhood residences
and a~reximatcly 90 citizens attended a community
93-~91 10/13/93
............... IL __ J ..... I ~ I .......... Ii ....
orientation meeting held on July 29, 1993, in which sta£f
presented preliminary alternatives for this area, He further
stated the Planning Commission recommends adoption of the
HuouenotYRobiou~/Midlothian Area Plan amendment.
issue.
Mr. sarber stated he and his Planning Commission
representative participated in the public hearing and he felt
the meeting was ousseosful in addreooing citizen concerns.
He e~pressed appreciation to staff for their time and efforts
in developing thio Plan and working with the citizeno in this
area.
Mr. Barber then made a motion, seconded by Mr. McHale, for
the Board to adopt the ~u.~ueoot/Rob~nu~gMidlothian Area Plan,
an amendment to the 1986 Northern Area Land Use and
Transportation Plan, part of the County's Comureh~nsivs Plan.
(It is noted a copy of the Plan is filed wi6h the papers of
thi~ Board.]
Vote: Unanimous
ghost w~iting letter~ as it relates to the prohlem~ his home
ha~ expe~ienoe~ ~ue to shrin~/swoll coil a~d Building Code
violations being cited by the County~ building official. He
re£erenoed several dcoumen~s regarding which t~s~s were
conducted and requested the Board to call for a federal grand
jury investigation, to crea~e a ~inanclal fun~ to properly
repair homes damaged by shrink/swell soil, and for the County
to civilly pmrsue Building Code violations, by citing all
Code violations, a~ it relate~ to hi~ hom~. ~ then
referenced hi~ request to the County for financial
reimbursement, from its Risk Management Insurance Fund, for
damagem hi~ home ha~ experienced_ He eub~itted i~t0 the
record copleo of tek,ers written by Tomes Corporation.
Discussion, comments, and questions ensue4 relative t0 the
County citing all Build~ng Code violat~on~ allowed by law;
the prs¢sss u~ed in citing suilding Code viola%icao;
correspondence which is sent to bnilders/dev~lopers notifying
them of a potential violation being documented; the goal
being to dOCument this t~pe of information on computers for
citizeno to have easy access; the timeframe in which all
=ngineering reports will be completed; whether the Board can
request a federal grand jury inveotigation; citizeno being
able to place complaints about possibl, criminal activity to
be conoidered by the U.S. Attorney General; whether the
County has been or would be informed if a federal grand jury
investigation is initiate4; the mechanismo %he Board has ~u%
in place to address th~ issue of ~hrink/mwell ~oil; and the
appropriate ~orum ~o address al~egatlons of misconduct.
It was the general con~ensu~ of the Boar~ for the Coun=y
Attorney to sub. it to the Co~ffmonwealth,s Attorney the
information uubmitt=d by Mr. Karnes.
on ~et~on of M~, MCHal=, seconded by M_r. Barber, the Board
suspended itc rules at this time and
Authorization to Appeal the Decision of the Board of Boning
Appeals ("BZA") in Case ~3~/qQl~ Granting a Special Exception
to the Melody school of Dance to Allow Dance Classes in a
Rome in the BeKley Subdivision.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Warren~ me~onded by Mr. ~arb~r, the Board
muthurlze~ the filing of an appeal for Case 92AN0129 granting
& ~peoi&l ~xceDtion to the M~lody School of Dance to allow
dance classes in a home in the Bexley Subdivision and
authorized the County Attorney to r~tain legal counsel to
represent the parties.
WORK SESSION CE THS 1994 LEGISLATIYE PROGRAK
Mrs. DeHart reviewed the leglslative timetable and presented
There was brief discussion relative to the legislative
timetable and the ~anner i~ w~ich School ~0ard
On motion of Mr. Colbert, seconded by Mr. McBale, the Board
serve at the pleasure of the Board of supervisors.
Vote: Unanimous
revenue, now or in the future, for zchool capita! needs.
Mrs. beHert then reviewed the proposed Administration cf
requiring bidders to submit original wor~ paper~ within
days after bid opening if the bidder wi~h~s to withdr~w the
hi~ due =o a mistake; permitting businesses within an
enterprise zon~ to qualify for tax incentives if 50 percent
conduct of their trade or business within their own
enterprise zone or any other enterprise zone within the
preference in the event of a tie bid; and amending the Code
of Virginia to allow a local governin~ body ~o request
Com~i=~ioner of the Division of Motor Vehicles to
special license plates whose design insorporates the seal or
logo of the tceal govornment.
Mrs. DeHart then ~evi~we~ the ~ro~osad Planning ~nd Community
There was brief discussion relative to amending the Community
Development Bond Act to include provisions which would
provide greater financial mtability to local governments and
amending the Code of Virginia bo grant the Board of
Supervisors finul authority to prohibit through truck
through truck traffic on ~eccndary highways.
There wes Drier discussion relative ~o amending or repealing
a section of the Code to allow police officers to make an
investigative er Terry stop of an indlvldunl suspected of
committing a misdemeanor. Hr. ~cEaie requested the ckief of
Police to review thi~ issue further.
Mrs. DeHart then reviewed legislation items to
support/oppose.
There was brief discussion relative to supporting a
constitutional amendment to p~rmit ~l~ct~d gchool board~ with
taxing power.
Mrs. De,art stated those items~ with the e~ception of those
at the work session scheduled for ~ovember 10, 1993.
(It is noted a copy cf the ~raft 1994 proposed Legi$1ativ~
Pro,ram is filed with the paper~ of thi~ Board.)
Al=er Drie~ discussion, on motion of ~=. ~c~ale, seosnds~ Dy
amend its regular meeting schedule.
On motion of ~r. McHala, seconded by ~r. Colbert, the ~oar~
On motion cf Mr. McHale, seconded by Nr. Colbert, the Board
adgo~rned at 1o:3o p.m. until ootober 15~ 1993 et 3:~0 p.m.
to the Rogers Building for a retreat with =he School ~oard.
Arthur S.
Chairman
93-694 10/13/93
BOLD OF SUPERVISORS/SCHOOL RO~.R~ RETREAT
HI~TES
October 15, 1993
Supervisors in ~ttendanca~
~dward R. Sarber, Vi=a Chrm.
Whaley M. Colbert
Harry G. Daniel
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
CoUnty Administrator
School Board Members in
Attendance:
Es. Elizabeth B, Davis~ Chairman
Mr. ~arshall w. Trammell, Jr.,
Vi~e chairman
Mr. Timothy C. Brown
Dr, Harry A. Johnson
Ks. Dianne E. Pettitt
Mr. Thoma~ R. Fulghum
School Superintendent
county ~haff i~ Attendaace:
Ms. Terri Burgess, Tnterim
Dir., News & P~blio
Information ~rvic~
Mr. Bradford s. Eammer,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Managemen~ Services
Deputy Co. Admin.,
~u~an Services
~r. Steven L. Micas
County ~ttorney
Ms. Theresa M. Pitts,
Clerk to the Board
M~. Ja~es J. L. Sbegmaier,
Mr. M. D. Stith, ~r.,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Cei~munity Development
school Staff ~n Attendanee~
Dr. Carl K. Chafin~ Asst.
Superintendent,
Institutional Services
Mr. Larry J. Elliott, Deputy
Superintendent,
Instructional Service~
Dr. Harold D. Gib~on, A~et.
Mr. Frederick Howland,
Managing Dir., Facility
Services
~r. R. ~arry Johns, Asst.
S~pe~i~tendent, Finance
MS. Debts Marlow, Dir.,
Community Relations
Dr. Craig Organ, Managing
Dir.~ Instructional
Technology and Information
Management
Dr. Barbara Pi~apia, A~t~
Superintendent, Student
Support Services
~r. warren called ~he meeting ~o order at
I. CONSOLIDATION UPD~TR
Mr. Hammer pre~n%ed an overview of consolidation issue= and
~ev~ewed m~mbership to the Futur~ Consolidation Committee; th~
County~School fleet maintenans~ agreement; development of a
eoBtract for th= consolidation of fleet maintenance mervlc~
for school buses and other vehioles~ and current evaluation of
the Walmsley Read ~chool bus repair facilities site.
95-695 10/15/93
There was brief discussion relative to evaluation of the
Walm$tey Road school bu~ repair ~it~ beiDg addremm~d during the
drivers should have the responsibility to fuel their own buses.
ci~cussiun on this issue ~Qeused on liability and school DUe
owners being responsible for this operat±on~ the cost fu=tor
related to school bus drivers performing this function; and tho
type of ~yste~ which could be i~plemented for ~uch a procedure.
Mr. ~ammer then reviewed the consolidation operation of
remaining issue needing to be ~ddressed is th~ necessity to add
Mr. Johns reviewed the status of the eurre~t Operation for
warehouse, eouri~r, and storeroom
Discussion focused on the County/School consolidation efforts
and the operatien being publicized and available as an
informational source to other localities.
Mr. Hammer then reviewed the ~tatus of social work and mental
health services consolidation issue and stated a joint
committee s~udied all issues and have developed a set
recommendations to improve communication and info~matien
sharing to assist in better serving children in the county.
then ~eviewed manful heulth services and stated subco~unittees
hays been meeting to study the ressmmendatiens of the Future
Consolidation Committee and drug prevention services including
conducting a study on bow best ~o organize, ~snage, and
coordinat~ ~ubstance abuse prevention services in the coca. unity
and schools using all available f~nds more effectively.
Discu~mion focused on a resent article in USA Today, indicating
available information does not substantiate that the Orug and
Aloohol Resistance Education (D~E) Program is making a
feeling of the Co~ty/Schools being that the Program is very
important.
identification of a pilot maint~anc~ di~ict to ~p~at~ a
pilot "consolidated" gruund~ maintenanc~ area and const~ct~on
manaq~ent including the Joi~t Sites Committee to coordinate
lan~ aogui~i~ion and site salad%ion functions of beth
County/School offices.
Discussion focused on site acquisition ~nd ~se of the
the Site Selection Co~itte~ being =omposed of County/School
Mr. Ha=er ~hen reviewed printing an~ duplicating fund=ion= an~
~ depelo~ment of a memorand~ of understanding to Jointly
~ho~; demogra~hic~ ~nd population projections including
County/Schools staff sharing information an~ co.on
School staff receiving training on t~e COunty's Ge~raphic
Information ~ys~em (GIS) system; th~ county'~
projecting long-~m needz; and the SchooI'~ data~me
addressing th~ mo~ i~eOiate needs.
Disc~ssio~ fooused on the users of the GIS system amd the
system in general; whether other school ~ystem~ are
wi~ dhesterfiel~ in ~e area of Qonsolld=tion; whether =here
are other areas of oonsolidation which should b~ ad~e~se~;
con~ol~datio~ i~es which should bm revlslte~ by thm Furze
Consolidation Committee.
II. INSTRUCTIONAL ISSUES
A. OUTCOI~E B~ED EDUCATION (OEE)
Mr. Ellictt presented an 0re,view On the basic =amponsntm of
Outcome ~a~ed ~ducation (OB~] including the definition of OBE;
promotion and graduation being based upon demonstration of
identified competencies; demonstration of competencies
occurring at eny time, not necesea?ily at the end of nine
months; existence of high standards with only three acceptable
grades; existence in the traditional curriculum which is
irrelevant to students and their future needs; and
transformation of the curriculum to produce the desired
outcomes.
Discussion focused on the dc£inition u£ tke "demonstration of
oompetencie~" and ~tud~nt~ not b~ing p~smoted from grade to
Mr. Ellictt then reviewe~ transformational os~, its
instructional characteristics, and County concerns regarding an
O~E system. K~ stated Chesterfield county has not embraced OBE
and has no plums to change its traditional curriculum.
Ther~ was brief discussion relative to the definition and
components of ~he ~th grade literacy pa~s port.
Mr. Elliott then reviewed the County's instructional
studies curriculum.
Nr. Elliott then reviewed the County's grading criteriu and a
chart of comparisons of grade distributions £rum 19S7-93,
grades 6 through 12.
Mr. Warren excused himself from the meeting.
It was g~nerully agreed to recess for fifteen minutes.
Reconvenlng:
Dr. Chafin pre~ented an overview of School teohnology needs and
the status of developing a long-range plan for technology
initiatives.
Discussion focused on dsvelopment of a master ~lan for
technology initiatives for schools and the timeframe in which
the ~lan would ~e completed; cc~ponents Q£ the plan;
distribution of computer equlpmRnt throughout th~ ~chool~; th~
methods available for schools to acquire computer equipment;
and standards for purchasing computer equlp~ent for ~chool~.
93-~97 10/1~/93
III. DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL REVENUE PROJECTIONS
Mr. ste~aier pre~nted an overview of local revenue
projections including the structure of County fund~
governmental, internal service, and enterprise.
There wa~ brief ~is~uss~on relative to the Utilities Fund as it
relates to ~ebt and =he issuance of bonds.
Mr. Steg~eier then reviewed total County revenue for the FY94
budget being approximately $475 million and Utility Funds
revenues.
Discussion focused on t~e impact of t~e State's calculation of
the stress index in receiving State revenue and the imposer hat
mediun household income has on the stress indeR.
~r. Stegmaier then reviewed revenue for the Airport, Vehicle/
Co~uniuations, Risk Management, and Genemal P~d Grants.
Th~r~ was brief discussion rela%ive ~u funding as i~ r~lates to
State mandated p~ograms.
Mr. Ste~aier then reviewed the School operatin~ funds and
General Fund r~venues.
Mr. Warren returned =o the meeting.
funds being the r~sponsibility cf the Treasurer.
Mr. Barber excused himself from the meeting.
Mr. Ste~aier then reviewed General Fund revenues in further
detail including info,atica regarding permits and fees for
Building Inspection, Planning, Sanitation, a~d Gable
Television.
M~. Barber returned to the meeting.
health service~.
Discussion focused on the Board'~ discretionary mua~uru~ --
contro~ over r~v~nu~s and the County being under a co~t order
to m==t food stamp r~quire~ent~.
including sale of printing and charges for police, fire,
inves~n=~ and rent; fi~s ~nd for~iture~ for court fines;
ba~e ratio.
Mr. Ste~aier continued to review General Fund local taxes
There was ~rie£ discussion r~lative to bbs 9-1-1 telephone
system as it relates to the County's portion of the cost.
Mr. Stegmaierthen reviewed General Fund property tax including
tools, and pmnaltles and interest and the list of indicators
used to track and monitor revenue projections,
It was generally agreed ts recess for dinner.
Reccnveninq:
C~ITAL IK~ROVEMENT P~OGRAH (SIP) IGSU~,
P~OJECT PRiORITIeS
C. MEALS TA~
D. BO~D ~EFE~ENDUH
ALTERNATIVE FUNDING
Discussion focused on acquisition of th~ Riv~rton school site
as it ~lat~ to the ~988 Bond Referendum and the
County/Schools ~nformlng the public as to where school sites
will b= locatud prior to u bond sale.
Dr. Chufin then reviewed a prioriti~ed lis= of school saDital
improvem~n~ ne~ds and costs for FY94-99.
Discussion focused on whether Carver Middle School would be
closed if a new middle schoo~ wa~ built; consideration being
given to a new Matoaca High School rather than making
improvements to L.C. Bird an~ Thomas Dale High
school; ~he percentage o~ blask/white studen~ a~ten~ing
Matoaca Hiqh School; u request by Dr. Johnson for a study to be
done on issues relating ts Ma~oaca High $cheol; the size of
Matoacu High ~chool as it compares to oth~r high schools in the
County; the average coat of land acquisition for a school site;
the possibility of M~adowbreck High School being moved up on
thc priority list and concerns expressed by citizens in this
a~sa that th~ c~ntral Dart of th~ County has been excluded from
this analysis; and the future bond sale meeting the school
capital needs of the County.
Dr. Chufin continued bo review the prioritize~ list of school
capital improvement needs and costs for FY94-99 and,
specifis~lly, for school ~ite and facility maintenance
and facility improvements to support the use cf t~hnology in
the schools; school oapital improvement fun~s availablethrough
FY99; and anticipated completion dates based upon available
fonts for projects to relieve school overcrowding and other
additions/projects.
Discussion focused on th~ scheduling for a bond referendum and
its impact on the proposed pro~ects; fhe county's borrowing
Capacity; th~ timefr~ne i~ which th~ County can sell
93-699 10/15/93
....................... L ......... J L ! I ..... I!
based on its debt capacity; and the possibility of u~ing
~urplu~ funds from County/Schools for construction of a new
~chool; identifying needs and addressing the ~mpa~t of projects
referendum being critical in addressing ~chool
p~ojeots; and safety issuas associated with
e~per~encing overcrowding.
Mr, Warren ~ate~ th~ County A~minis~ra~or would review funding
possibility of accelerating constraction of the Enon/~arrowgate
Elementary school.
T~ere was brief discussion relative to tAe two Boards meetin~
in early December to receive an update from staff on the
possibility of accelerating t~e construction of Enon/Harrow~ate
Elementary school; the need ~o address specific Droje¢~s for a
bond referendum and the timing of a bond referendum; and the
issue o~ a m~als
County Administrator
Arthur S. Warren
Chairman
93-700 10/15/93