Loading...
10-27-93 MinutesBOARD ~F 8UPERV~SO~B ~L'UTES Supervisors ~ &~te~da=ce= ~.. Arthur S. Warr~, chairman Mr. Edward B. Ba~be~, Vies Chrm. Mr. Whaley M. Colbert Mr. Harry ~. Daniel M~. J. L. McHale~ III Mr. Lane B. Rams®y Ceunty Administrator Ms. Sarbara ~ennet%, Dir., Offies on Youth Mr. crai~ Bryant, Pit., Utilitie~ Ms. Terri 5urgess~ Interim Dir., News & Public Information Services ~. Jana carter, Dirl, ~cu~inq Legls. ~vcs. and Intergove~n. Affair~ Building official Fire Department Mr. Bradford S. Ha~er, Deputy Co. Admin., Management Serv~cee Mr. Russell Harris, ~r. William H. Howell, Mr. Thomas E. Jacobsen, Dir., P15nning Mr. Riohar~ Leonard, Administrativa Analyst, Environmental Engineering Deputy Co. Admin., Mr. Richard ~unnally, Dir., ~4r. Styllan P. Parthemo~, Police Department Ms. Theresa M. Pitts, Cl~rk to the Board Mr. Jsne~ J. L. Stegmaier~ Dir., Budget & Management Mr. ~. D. Stith, Jr., Deputy Co. Community Development sh=ri££ clarence williams, Sr. Frederick willis, Jr., Dir., Human Resource Mr. Warren called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at 3:~5 p.m. 93-701 10/27/93 1. APPROVAL OF HINUTES 1.A. OCTOBER 1~ 1993 On motion of Mr. Colbert, ~eccnded by Y~r. McMale, the Board agproved the ninute~ of Oot0ber 13, 1993, as snbnlt=sd. Vote: Unanimous on motion of Mr. colbert, se=ended by Hr. ~¢Hale, the Bo=rd approved the minute~ of OCtob~ 15, 1993, as submitted. Vote: Ununimous Outstanding Chapter Member for 1993 in the Stute of virginia for ~xhibiting ~he graat~st pTofes~ional involvement through the regional or international l~vel of IP~A. He ~tated as a recipient of thi~ Award, Mr. Willi~ will be the Virginia "Edwin L. ~wain Award" at the Spring, 1994 r~gional congratulate~ him an~ staff on thi~ aohiave~ent. Virginia Ccvsrrn~ent Finanos Officer's A~ociation Award in ~ubmitted for considsration was entitled, "Empow=rmant Through Departmental Budgetary Centrol~" which is par~ OS r~%e County's Total Quality Improvement Program. ~e them presented Mr. Steg~aier with the Award and congratulated him 3. BO~D OOM~ITTEB REPORTS Mr. Daniel stated he attended a meeting at Richmond City ~all hosted by Mayor Kenney, the Virginia Association of Counties, th~ Virginia Municipal League, and the Virginia School Boards ASsociation, with the topic of diucuuuiun being un£unded State ~andates. M~. MCHale ~tated all BOaMd members paMtioipated in t~e Board of Supervisors/School Board retreat held on October 15, 1993 and noted it was mutually ugreed to ~eek wuy$ to uccelerat¢ construction to buil~ am elementary school to rellev~ overcrowding at ~aon and Hurrowgate ~le~entary Schools. ~e further stated ~e a~tended Ch~ ~eoend stage o~ ~he Henriuus annual m~eting in ~enrico County on October ~, 1993; that he was a quesU s~eak~r st the ~naual me~tln~ e£ th~ Henricus Foundation, with the topic of di~su~slon being the River Chesterfield Farm Bureau annual dinner meeting on October ~6, 1993. 93-702 10/~7/93 Mr. Colbert stated he attended a Watershed Management Co~mittee meeting on October 2~, 1993; that he attended the United Way Proqram meeting and noted the County exceeded goal; that he attended two meetings on 0otobsr 22, 1993 -- the NAACP Banquet and the Qua~te~ Masten'a Regimental Bail; and that he and Mr. Danlel attended a program at $outhsido Ch%Lrch of the Nauarenu on October 24, 1993. Mr. Daniel stated Southside Church of the Nazarene gave a Chesterfield Co~ty, what the County has to offer, and the responsiveness of government offioiale in general. He noted h~ was impresmed by the pr~m~ntatlon and the County wa~ h~ld in high regard in every respeot. Mr. Barber stated ~e attended the Boa~d of S~pervisors/$chool Board retreat; that he attended the Virginia Muni0ipal League legislative business meeting; that he is chairing the Private Industry Council and ~olioy Committee and noted youth addressed; that he attended an Exlstln~ Industry breakfast; that he attended the Che~t=rfi¢ld Business Council legislative reception; that he and Mr, McHale attended the Henricus Foundation annual meeting; that h~ attended "~idlothian Village Day;" that he attended the Credit Union'~ annuul meeting on October 16~ 1993; that he group of students visiting from FranceF and that his next *'First Monday'~ constituents meeting will be held November 1, 19~, with the topic of discussion being th~ propo~ed expansion at the Ban Air Learning Center. Mr. Warren stored he addressed partio~pante of the that he was a guest speaker at the Chesterfield Senior Citizen's Hall of Fame awards ceremony held at the Central Library on october 21, 1993 a~d noted F~, Colbert also attended; that he attended =he Beard of Supervisors/~chool Board retreat; that he attended the Chesterfield Council Legi~laaive Reception; that ha attended "Midlothian Villaqe Day/' that he attended the Rich~ond Board of Realtor~ 1993; an~ tha~ hs atten~md and prms~nte~ an award to County police officers at the Police Co--unity Award~ ceremony on ~. Ramsey in=ro~uo~d Sheriff Clarence G. William~ and Captain David ~utton of the County's Sheriff's Department and ~utton's accomplishments and his initiative to partlc~pate in the Richmond Times-Dispatch Marathon. Sheriff Williams loyal employee who wa~ dlagno~e~ w~th a brain tu~or approxlm~tely two years ago. He fur~er stated Ca~tain ~utton is an inspiration to enployeem and citizens of the Couaty fur reachin~ his goal. Mr. Warren stated he is per,anally inspired by Captain ~utton's accomplishments in overcoming his illness. Captain Hutton stated he participated in the Marathon as indi=at~d he hupe~ he ha~ provi~e~ inspiration to ~uff~ring f~om ~im~lar 93-?03 10/27/93 CHAN~E8 IN T~B ORDER 0P PRBSENTATION On motion of Mr. Mc/tal~, ~econded by Mi. Colbert, the 0card moved Item 13., Re~olution Recognizing FAr. H. Joseph Lewin for bis Outstanding Service to Chesterfield County to immediately follow thio item; Teplaced Item 7.C.4., Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance to Amend the code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as A~emded, by ~ending and Reenacting Section 19.1-S Relating to Taxicabs and Other Vehicles for Hire; added Item 7.C.13., Adoption of Re~olutioe Supporting the Rich~ond Chamber of Coauuerce's Recommendations in Addressing the Regional Wa%er Issue to follow Item 7.c.l~.o., Acceptance a£ Parcel of Land Along Perrymont Road from ASphalt ~aintenanoe, Inoo~parated~ and added Item 7.C.14., Initiation of Application to the Board Qf Zoning App~al~ Requesting a Var~unce for Property Located at ~514 and 1516 Irvaeway Lane to tallow Item 7.C.13. a~, adopted the agenda, as amended. Vote: Unanimous o RE00~NIEI~ ~R, B, JOSEPH LEWIN FOR HIS 0UTSTANDIN~ Mr. Sti=h introduced Mr. ~. Joseph L~win, ~t~tion N~ affiliate, kTIAR-TV; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lew~n wa~ inmtrum~n~al in consolidating construction efa new and baaut~ful ~tate-of-the-art atudio and relocating in Chesterfield County in I990; ~{EREAE, Mr. Lewin has been a strong sub,otter of Che~t~field County as well ~s the entire Richmond and Tri- citiu~ area and i~ an active m=mbur of tho ~e~roDolitan strong supporter of education; establishing a volunteer telethon for education; instituting the Prom Promise Program; worked diligently to lobby the United Stuta~ WH~EAS, mare r~cently, ~. ~awin to~k = l~ad~ruhi~ ~ule in support for ~e victims of Hurricane ~drew in Florida and flood victims in the mid-we~, an~ or~mnizea u tornado ~S, Mr. Lewin is an activ~ member of the M~ternal served as Pre~id~nt of ~ ~ts Council of Ric~ond, Incorporated, Pr~siden= of the Virginia Associa=~on of Broadcasters, and First vice chairman of tho ~ttor Business B~rea~; ~erved on the Mar~h of Di~e~ Board aud Virginia Commonwealth University, Mass Communications Advisory Committee; i~ a founding member of the Greater Richmond SpOrtS Baokern; and Board Member for the virginia Blood Service. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield county Board of Supet-visors does hereby co--end Mr. H. Joseph Lewis for his outstanding service tu Chesterfield County and the surrounding area and wishes him well in his future endeavors. vote: unanimous Mr. Warren presented the executed resolution to Mr. Lewin and expressed appreciation for his service to the County and ~urrounding area, congratulated him on his job ao¢ompli'shments~ and wished him well in his future endeavors. Mr. Lewi~ expressed appreciation for th~ reccg~itio~ and ~tated he would miss beinq a~le to provide ~ervice to the county. Mr. Parthemos stated the report regarding cat licenming and · animal control issuee i~ the result of a 1993 statute adopted by th~ General Assembly authorizing localities to license cat~ in the same marmot as dogs. He then introduced ~s. Lisa overview. MS. Dewey presented a brief overview on eat licensing and animal control issues and stated the 199~ General Assembly authorized localities to license cats in the same manner as dogs. She reviewed the components of a cat licensing ordinance including the requirement of proof of rabie~ vaccinations that cats, four mon~h~ old or older, will be required to be licensed annually. She further ~tat~d State s~atuto authorize~ a li¢onsing £e~ di~£ercn~ial be~woen and $10.00 to encourage sterilization cf pets and reviewed the County's current ordinanoe a~ it relates to license fees fo~ dogs; the purchase of dog licens=s; and dogs being required ~o wear licenses Dot no~ oats. $~e reviewe~ pet licensing ordinances in other localities and animal control Dullcies and stated currently ~he Animal Control DeDsrtmont, as it relates to cats only, investigates complaints of cat bites; that the Animal Control DepartNent does not pick up ~tray~ ahandoned~ or wild caf~ but will accept eat~ fro~ the public; that cats are not proh~blt~d from running at-large dogs are; and ~hag Animal Control requires do~ owners =o pay a fee to sbtsin their dng from Animal Control if picked up from running at-large or for adoption of a dog whoreas these charge~ do not apply to cats~ ~r. MsHalo excused himself from the meeting. Ms. Dewey then reviewed th~ number of ~ats and outhanize~ by Animal Control and the reasons ~he legislation has been enacted including reducing rabies in cats, reducing the number of strays and wild oats by encouraging starillxation, allowing Animal Control to have th~ authority tO investigate cat complaints, and the process being made easier in returnin~ cats to owner~. Mr. McHale roturned to th~ m~e~ing. 93-705 10/27/93 Ms. Dewey then reviewed the disadvantages of cat licensing including a high cunt te implement and enforce; the compliance rate being low; ~ucce~ of the program being based on a ~trong commitment from staff and citizen~; creating an increaend workload for A~imal Control; and citizens being opposed to cats being required to w~ar collaru and citizen opposition to a new tax. She then reviewed cat licensing ordinances enacted in Virginia and other mtates; the need for additional egulpmen~, personnel, sn~ ~rainin~ if a cat licensing ordinance i~ adopted; staff concerns regarding the responding negatively to a new tax. She then reviewed rece~endation~ from the Chesterfield A~i~u~l Control Hducational/Advisory Committee including adoption of a cat licensing ordinance; expanding cost differential be=ween sterilized and non-sterilized animals~ permitting five "companion" animals by a~e~ding the Zoning Ordinanoe~ and proposed state legislation permitting sterilize=ion of a pet/animal after being picked up by Animal Control three times, she revlew~d the breakdown of estimated costs and revenue a~ociated with cat llcen~inq and recommendations from %he County Administr=tur including nu ~uard action at thi~ time and increasing th~ differential licensing fee for non-~terillzed pets through a 1994/~5 budget recommendation. She then reviewed the issue of eats caught in tree~ a~d it not being an appropriate Dublin safety function for police/fire personnel to rescue cats caught in trees. R~GARDiNG T~E CHAHBER OF COF~ERDE'0 RE~ORT O~ RICF-~OND M~TROPOLITANAREA~0T~BLE WATER SUPPLY A~DDBM~/~D Mr- Stith stated at the October 15, 1993 Board meeting, Mr. James Dunn, President of the Metropolitan Riot~mcnd chamber of Associates, presented a report concerning water quality in next constituents meeting on November 1, 1~ a% clever ~ill High School, with the topic of discussion being w&te~ Mr. Bryant reviewed ¢onclusion~ and reco~endation~ of the Rishmond Metropolitan Area Potable Water supply and Demand Revf~w Study inGluding the Richmond Water Treatment Plant having an ultimate capacity between 132 to 150 million gallons a day (mgd); the Henrieo Water Treatment Plant having a capacity of 55 mgd; the Psmunkey River not being an alternative to expansion of the Richmond Water Treatment in the ~ity ef Richmond and the region; water supply taking Reservoir not being available as a water supply past t~e year Ke stated staff does not concur available water supply pas~ t. he year 2Gl0 en~ stuff feels any County's discretion with ~he County continuing to use the the Chamber's report but excluding th~ recommendation a water supply. Mr. Bryant continued to review recommendations in the .Cha~berts report including maintaining some excess capacity in the water system to provide for economic developmentl the planning for additional capacity beginning when the peak-day demand reeohee 85 percent of t/~e available capacity; and ocnotructlen oS =apaclty being timed so new capacity would came o~-line When demand equals 95 percent ef existing capacity. ~ere was brief discussion relative to Lake chesdin as it relates to capacity and tho cost of production at Swift Creek Reservoir as compared to Leke Chesdin. Mr. Bryant continued to review recommendations in the Ctlamber's report including the Pamunkey River being secured as a water supply source for the region; Hcnrico County continuing to purchase water from the City of Richmond oven after the Henrico Water Treatment Plant is constructed; and the city Of Rich~ond commissioning a ~tudy to d~termlne the ~lti~ate capacity of th~ plant. Ther~ wa~ brief discuSSion relative to th~ Ric~ond Plant it relates to rmpair~ and ~hm city o~ Richmon~ roaching a consensus with ~enrico County regarding construction issues. Mr. Bryant continued %o review recommendations in the Chamber'~ report including all trea~ent Dlant~ in the area ~eing mtandardized on the use of disinfectants to a]tow water to be inte~-mixed; a Jame~ River Water ~anmge~nt Plan being developed; and the Richmond Water Treatment Plant capacity being utilized b~fore construction of the Henrlco Plmnt. There was brief discussion relative to ~he impact on full utilization of the Richmond Plant2 the ultimate capacity of the Richmond Plant; and the scheduling of bringing capacity on line. Mr. Bryant continued to review re~o~ndation~ of Chamber'~ report including the city of Richmond and Henrico County working with Hanove~ County in constructing a transmission main to supply water to Hanover County. He ~hen reviewed a g~aph outlining f~t~re projected dem~nd~ on the water needs can be met well past the year 203U. He reviewed =Be history of regional coopers=ion including t~e County being a member cf the Appomattox River Wut=r Authority; H~ghts, Petersburg, and Richmond; the County working with ~h~ Coon%las of Amelia, ~erlan~, an~ Powhatan addressing Lake Genito as a viable water supply; and County recently entering into a contract with the City of Rich~ond to purcha~ a portio~ of their Plant's There was brief discussion relatlve to the County utilizing Lake Genito a~ a ~upplement to Lake Chesdin to provide ad4itional water capacity. Couno~l's Report on drinking water quality which indicated ~ut uDproximatuly 1~0 milllon 9eagle are affected by driving w~t~r violation~; that 43 pure=mt cf public water monitoring requirements; that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State regulatory agencie~ ate not providing public water supplies violated standards, the public did not had no violations of standards, monitoring requirements, reporting requirements and r~vlewe~ efforts by the County to 93-707 10/27/93 assure water quality including implementing monitoring programs which eRceed requirements; a flushing program to bring in £re~h water if test results indicates any deterioration of water quality; enhancement of in-house laboratory capabilities £er tasting; prevision s£ training tu operations and laboratory personnel in meeting regulations; development of good working rela=isnships with regulatory agencies; and optimization of the County's treatment for corrosion control. Be ~tate~ the County has bee~ able to do ~or~ than ±~ raguir~d by th~ r~gulat~on~ du~ to Eupport from Mr. Ramsey stated the quality of water deals with ~anaging water in the distribution system a~ wall as the quality of the efforts of s~aff in not being required ~o provide public notice to citizens. Discussion, comments, end questions ensued relative to water users; additional cost information being necessary to determine the impact of an authority on county citizens; the impact on the County's rate~ if Henries County builds a water treatment plant without the regional cooperation addressed by the chan%ber c~ commerce; and th~ breakdovn ~f the County'~ resolution supporting the Richmond Chamber of Commeree~s relative to the County deciding the future of swift Creek On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. NcH~le, the Board amended the proposed resolution supporting ~he Riob_~ond Chamber of Com~erc~'~ r~co~ndation~ in addr~ning th~ regional water issue relative to the County deciding the vote: Unanimous On motion of ~ir. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board moved Item 7.C.13., Adoption of Resolution Supporting the Richmond chamber of commerce's Recommendations in Addressing th~ Regional Water Issue to immediately ~ollow ~his item. O~ motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Hr. McHale, the Board adopted the following resolution: W~=E~AS, the ~etropclitan Richmsn4 chamber of commerce appointed a co~mitt~e of technical experts and review committee si prominent business leaders =o ass±sL in solving the metropolitan water issue; and W~EREAS, member~ of the committee~ gave ~any hour~ Of their time in identifying the technical ~ssues and developing metropolitan area; and kqIEREAS, the study w~s conducted in a non-parti~an manner to promote the economic health of th~ r~gion; and W~R~AS, regional cooperation is paramount in achieving ~ER~AE, the Metropolitan Richmond Cha~er of Commerce ~pecific recu~endations for meeting the metropolitan area ~EAS, swift Cre~k Reservoir is an integral part of Chesterfield County's long-term water supply; and ~R~, th~ Chamber Ta~k Force Chairman appeared before the Board of supervisors at the October 13, 1993 meeting and clarified the Swift Creek Reservoir co~ent in the study to ~ay that t~e Swift C~eek Reservoir should be used a~ a water resource as long as feasible and that ch=starfleld County will decide the future of S~ift Creek Reservoir. Now, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hoard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, does hereby commend the ~ffort$ of the Hetropolitan Ric~ond Chamber of ~D~ ~ IT Y~THER RESOLVED, that Chesterfield to continue to pursue and find regional solutions for future AND, BE IT FURTH~ RESOLVED~ that the Board Vote: Unanimous 6. DEFERRED ITEMS o APROINTRENTS ~REATER RT~HMON~ TRANSIT ~DRE~N¥ (~RT~) BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mr. Stith stated at the October 13, 1993 ~oard meeting~ Mr. ~. W. Henderson, Jr. and Mr. Joe Wa~ were ~ominsted to serve on the Greater Richmond Transit Company (~RTC) Board of Directors. Mr. Daniel reviewed Mr. Ward's r~sum~, stated he feels Ward'~ cred~ntlals ar~ impr~mmive, and he supports Mr. Ward for appointment to GRTC. ~tw. Barber ravlewad Mr. Henderson's e×perie~ee and expertise smd stated he supports Mr. Henderson for appointment to Boar~ to appoint Mr. N. W. Eenderson, Jr. to serve on th~ Greater Richmond Transit Company (GSTC) BEard of Directors, representing the County at-large, wha~e term would be mffective immediately and expire at the annual GRTC utockholder~ meeting in October, 1994. Ayes: Mr- Barber and Mr. ~c~ale. Nays: Mr. Warren~ ~4r. Colbert, an~ M~. Daniel. ~_r. Daniel made a ~otion, seconded by Mr. Wmrren~ for Board to appoint Mr. 3oe Ward to $~rv~ on the Greater Richmond Transit Company (GRTC) Board of Directors, representing the County at-large, whose term would 10/27/93 93-709 effective i~u~ediately and expire at the annual side,beldam meeting in Ootober~ 1994. Ay%s: Mr. Warren, Mr. Colbert, and Nr. Daniel. Nays: Mr. ~arber. Abstention: Mr. NcKale. GRTC 7. NEW BUSINESS 7.~. BSTABLISFd4ENT OF TOWING ADVISORY BOARD TO ADVIBE THE COUNTY WITH ~HEPHCT TO ~0TOR VENICLE TOWI~ S~KVIC~ Mr. Parthemo~ stated part of the General Assemhly's legislative amendments for 1993 included a mandate that local governments create an advisory board consisting of a member of =he towing indus=ry, police offidere, and members of the ~ublid to advi~e th~ ldcalit~ on term~ of towing centractz entered into between the County and towing operators for towing private vehicles. He further stated the Board of Supervisors will not review contracts ~0~ towing services for County or School vehiole~ amd ~taff re¢0~e~d~ appointment of Lieutenant David Hope of the Co~ty'~ Police D~partment and ~_r. Raymond Hevener, owner of Hevener'~ Exxon in Chester, to the Advisory Board. Mr. Colbert nominated Mr. William Funai to serve as a citizen representative on th~ Towin~ Advisory Board. Mr, McNale made a motion, seconded by Mr, Warren, for th~ Board to e~tabli~h the ToN~ng Advisory Boa~d to advi~e the County with respect to motor vehicle towing service contracts. There was brief discussion relative to the appointment of ~ember~ to ~erve on th~ Board. Mr, Warren called for the vote on the motion made by Mr. Mo~alo, ~oondod by hi~, for the Board to e~tebli=h the Towing Advisory Board to advise the County with respect to motor vehicle towing service contracts. On marion of Mr. McHale, seconded by ~Ix. Colbert, the Doar4 su~pmnded its rules at thi~ ti~e to allow ~i~ultaneou~ nomination/appointment of members to serve on the Towing Advisory Board. On motion of Mr. NcHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board ~imul~aneously nominated/appointed Lieutenant David Hope; Mr. Re. end Hevener; and Mr. William Funai to serve on the Towing A~visory Board, whose terms are effective i~e~iatmly aRd will be ~t the pleasure of the Board. Vote: Unanimous After b~i~f discussion, on motion of Mr. Daniel, ~econded by Mr. Warren, ~he Board approved une following streeElig~= installation cost approvals: Be~uda District * Chester Road and Old ~e~hire Drive, oD the ~xisting pole. No cost to install light. Dale Di~t~i~t * Teleetar Drive and Thorington Road, on the existing pole. No coat to inatall light. (Approved due to surety and welfare reasons.) ' o~ ~st lot * Corner Rock Road, vicinity of 2400, on existing pole. Mo cost to install light. Vote: Unanimo~ 7.C.1. ACCEPTANCE OF DEEDZ OF TRUST FOR MORTGAGE DOWN~AYMENT ~uND CLOSING COST ~SSIST~NC~ On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by ~r. Colbert, =he Board authorized the County A~mini~tra~or ts accept D~d~ of Trust ~s security for Mortgage Downpaymmnt and Closing Cost A~sistance Program loan~ for the following participants: LO/tetra Goodson 5114 W. Hundred Road $1,114.56 ~e~i~a ~reen Cr~w ~090~ Truth Orive 1,$57.45 Donna Myers 650~ W. Banes Court 1,285.17 Vote~ Unanimous POLICE ~IRI~G ~UPPLE~ER~ PROGRAM GRANT On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, th~ Board approved a request from the Chmsterfleld County Police Department to make application for a three-y~ar Federal Policm Hiring supplsment Program Grant which would Drovide funding for ten new patrol officer positions and one crime percent match in funding by the County if approved, and the Bu~gat and ~anagmmaat Office will attempt ts identify the ~ours~ of funding for the County match and other required funds ~uring the EYg~ budget process if the Connty is awarded the Grant.) ?.C.3. AUTHORIZATION POR ~O~NT¥ ~DMINI~T~ATOR TO E~TER INTO AG~EEH~N~ AND TRAESFER ~UND~ TO ~ROVIDE ~OR THE ~[DE~IN~ OF COaLFIeLD RO~D O~ ~otio~ Of Mr. NeHal%, s~conded by Mr. Colbert, the Board authorized th~ County Administrator to enter into a coalfield Road widening agreement with Tredegar Incorporated in a~oordance with the agreement being acceptable to th~ County A~erney; tranaferred $1.24 million from the IndmmtrlaI Acce~m Road Account for the Coalfield Ro~d wi~mning with the understandin~ that Tredegar'a Industri~, Incorporated payments to the County ~ill b= used to reimburse the Industrial Access Account; authorized the County Administrator to enter into County/Virginia D~partment of Tran~portatios/consultant coalfield Road wi~ening agresmmnts, acceptable to the County Attorney; and authorized the ¢ouDty A~inistrator ~o requeat construction bide. 93-711 is noted a eDDy of the draft vD:a: Unanimous agreement is filed with the 7.C.4. SET. D~TH FOR PUBLIC H~ARIN~ TO CONSIDER ~N ORDINANCE TO A..-~E19D TEE CODE OF THH co~Y 0P CHES~R~IELD,. 197E, AS ~/~END~.D, BY ~IENDIN~ AND REEN~CTiN~ SECTION 19,1-8 RELATING TO TAXICAES AND OTKER VEHICLE~ ~OR HI~E On mo~ion of ~r- ~c~al~, ~conded by Mr. Colbert, the Board set the date of November 23, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 197s~ as amendsd~ ~y amending and reenacting section 19.1-~ rslatlng to taxicabs and other v~hicles for hi~e. Vote: Unanimous SH~TION ~-12.~ O~ TEE COUNT~.CODH R~L~TIN~ TO PERSONAL PROPERTY..~i%XES A~ZEESED ON KOTO~ Afte~ b~ief discussion, on motion of Mr. Morale, seconded by l~r. Colbert, the ~oard Cancelled th~ ~etting of a public vehicles owned by m~mDer~ of volunteer reduc6 sq~ad~, fire de~artment~, and auxiliary police officers. Vote: Unanimous 7,C,6. STATE ROAD AOOEPTAN~E This day the County Envi~0~me~tal Engineer~ in accordance with direutions ~rom ~is Board, made report in writing upon his ~xamination of Spring Mill Road, Corryville Road and Corryville Circle in Brundon, Section G, clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof~ and on metion of ~r. Morale, Seconded by Mr. Colbert, ~t ~ rs~alved that spring ~ill Road, Corryvill~ Road and Corryville circle i~ Brandon, section G, Clover Hill Dist~ot, ~e and =hey hereby are ~ntabli~hed a~ public roads. And be it further re~olved, that the virginia Department of Transportation, be and it harab~ is requested to ta~e into the S~¢0ndary Syste~, Spring Mill Road ~xtends .07 mil~s from the intersection of Route 2331 ~o the Dui-de-sac. Torr~rVill~ Road extends .15 miles from the intersection of Route 1331 to the c~l-de-sac. Corryvill~ Circle s~t~nd~ .04 miles from the intersection of Corryville Road to the cul-de-sac. This r~qu~t i~ inclusive of the adjacent slope, ~ght distance, clear zone and designated virginia Department of Transportation drainag~ ~as~ents. And be it further resolved, ~hat the Boar~ of Supervisors g~arantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation an cuts, fills and drainag~ for all of th~e road~. 93-712 10/27/93 This session Seotlon G. Plat Book 77, Page 13. October 30, 1991. Thi~ day th~ County ~nvironn~ntal ~ngin~r, in with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Newbys Bridge Extended, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Mc~ale, seconded by ~r. Colbert, it is resolved that Newby= Bridge Extended, ClOVer Hill District, be and it hereby is established as a Duhlic road. And be it further re~olved~ that the virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to t~ke into the Sa=oodary System~ Kew~ys Bridge Extended extends .12 miles from the intersection of Route 6~4 to the cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive cf the adjacent slope~ sight distance, clear zone and designated ~irginia Department of · hi~ road ~erves as access to adjacent residential properties. ~d be it f~zthe~ ~esolved, that tho Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia DeDartment of Transport=tics an unrestricted right-of-way of 90' with necessary easements for cB%s, ~ills and drainage for this roa~. N~wbys Bridge ~xtended is r~¢or~ed as fellows: Plat Book 69, Page 9. November 30, 1989. on motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by ~. Colbert, th~ Board renamed a portion of existing Robious Road, in Midlothian ~is~ric~, as follows: Section I to "TWO Team Lane;" section ti to "Powder~a~ Lane;" and Seotien III to "Gra~ Oaks Lane." (It is noted copies of the maps are filed wits toe papers of this Board.) S¥STEM~ND BBS~ ~E~ENT ~P~%CTiCE FACILITY FOR ERNI COKPONEN~S On motion of ~r. McHale~ seconded by Mr. Colbert, tbs Board authorized the County Administrator to execute an Agreement for Maintenance of a Stor=water Drainage System and Best M=nagemen= Praotioe Facility with Erni ComDonents, with the County's only involvement being to assure the Maintenance Agreement i~ £ollowed by the owner a~ ~pprov~d ~y the County Attorney. (It i~ noted a dopy of the vioihity ~k~tch i~ Vote: Unanimous BEOUEST FROK MR. M.~RK BOTEET TO ENCROACH WITHI~ A T~N FOOT DRAINAGE ~SE)~E~T On notion of Mr. Me, ale, seconded by Hr. colbert, the Board approved a request from ~tr. Mark Esther to have a privacy Brmndon Subdivision, Section G, ~ubject to the execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a sopy of the vicinity ~ketch i~ filed with the papers of thi~ Board.) Vote: Unanimous FOR ~/~ES RIVER TRUNK EBWER PROJECT On ~otion of Mr. McHule, seconded by M~. colbert! the Board approved Change Order NO. 2 to J. K. Timmons and Associates, p.C_~ in the amount of $28,720, for additional inspection services required ~or uonstruotion of the Jame~ River Trunk Sewer Project. (It i~ noted funds are available in the Department of Utilities ca, itel Impruvsment Budget.) Vote: Unanimous EXERCISE EMINE~ DOMAIN FOR BI'FORD ROAD WATERMAIN EXTENSION PROJBflT ?.C.11.e. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION On motion of ~r. Mcaale, seconded by ~Lr. Colbert, t~e Beard authorized the County A~torney to proceed with eminent domain on an emergency basis and e~erei~e i~%mediate right of entT~ p~rs~ant to Section 15.1-238.1 of the Code of Virginia for acquisition of a 18 foot temporary construction easement across property o£ Sherwin-williams Development corporation, Tax Map 18~1~(11%4, for the Buferd Road Waturmuib Extension Project and authorized the County Administrator to notify the intention to take possession of the easement. (It is noted a Board.) Vote: Unanimoua On motion of Mr. McHale, seoonde~ by Mr, Colbert, the Board authorized the County Attorney to proceed wit~ eminen~ domain on an e~ergency basis and exercise immediate right ~f entry pursuant to Section 15.1-238.1 of the Code of Vi~cinia for acquisition of a 10 foot temporary construction easenent acro~ property of Mr. Michael A. Smith, Trustee, Tax Map 18- 15(1) 45, for the suford Road watermain ~tension Project and authorized the County Administ~ato~ to ~otify the owner by certified mail on October 25, 1993 of the County's intentisn to take possession uf th= easement. (It is noted a copy of t~e vicinity $~e=ch ia filed wit~ t~e papers of ~his Board.) Vute: Unanimous 93-714 1o/27/93 ACCEPTANCES OF PARCELS OF LAND VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FEDERAL CREDIT ONION After brief discussion, on motion of ~r. MeHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board accepted, on behalf of the County, the ¢onveyanue of a 15 foot Daroml of lan~ containing 0.14 acres along Bolsseau Street and Second Avenue from Virginia State University Federal Credit Union and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. {It is nQted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of thi~ Boa~d_) Vote: Unanimous 7,c.12.b. ~LON~ Bi~%NCHWAY ROAD FKO~ F~. DONALD accepted, on behalf of the County, the conveyance o£ a 15 foot parcel of land containing 0.086 acres along Branchway Katherman and authorized the County A~ministrator to ~xecute tho necessary deed. lit i~ noted a copy of the pla= is filed with the papers of this Board.) ?.B.12.~. ALON8 PERRYMO~T RO~D PROM AS~F2~LT M~INT~N~NCE, iNCOR;0RATED On motion of Mr. MoHalk, seoon~sd by ~r. Colbert, tho Board accepted, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of foot parcel of land along Perrymont Road from ~ainte~anee, I~ccrporated and authorized the County Administrator to execute th~ necessary deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 7.O.14. INITIATION DF APPLICATION TO THE EO~RD OF ~ONING APPEALS REQUESTING ~ V~RI~CE FOR ~RO~ERTY LOCATED AT 1514 AND 1516 IRVENWAY LltNE On ~otion Of Mr. ~cHale~ seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board initiated an application to the Board of Boning App~al~ req%leatinq a variance for property located at 151~ and 1516 HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED M~TT~RS OR CLAIMS There were no Bearings of Citizens on UnsCheduled Matters or claims scheduled at this time. On motion of Mr. ~cHale, seconded by ~r- Colbert, the Board accepts~ the follcwln~ regort~: Mr. Rameey presented the Board with a report on the developer water and gewer contract~ executed by th~ County Administrator. 93-715 10/27/93 Mr. Ramsay presented the BOa~d ~it~ a ~tatus repert on the Genenal Fund Balance;' Reserve far Future Capital Projects; District Road and Street Light Funds; and Lease Purchases. Mr. Ramsay stated the Virginia Department of Transportatioa has for/ually netified the County of the acceptance of the following roads into tho Sta~e Secondary system: ~DDITIONS LENGTH Route 3015 (A~stel Bluff Way) - From Route 631 to ~.29 mile Wes% Route 651 0.25 Mi Route 3935 {Amstel Bluff Terrace) - From 3015 to 0.33 mile Sou%twist Route 3015 0.33 Mi REDINGTON, ,SEC~IO~ - (Effective 10-8-93~ Rout~ R070 (Redington Drive) - F~om 0.13 mile Northwest Route 2598 to Rou=e 383~ Route 383~ (Redington Court) - From Route 2070 to O.0V mile Southwest Route ~070 0.07 Mi WALTON PARK, $~CTION S Route 4145 (Hollypark Drive) - From Reute 1385 to Route 4146 0.15 Route 4t46 (Walton Ridge Lan~) - From Route 1385 to 0.22 mile west Route 13S9 Route 4147 (Dannyhill Court) - From Rcu=e 4195 to 0.04 mile South Route 4158 0.04 Route 4157 (Shadyglen Court) - From Route ~385 to 0.09 mile Southwest Route 13~ Route 4158 (Damnyhill Road) - From Route to 0.17 mile Southwest Route 1385 O.17 Mi ARBOR L~D~ ~CTIO~ a - ~ff~ctiv~ to 0,07 mile Southeast Rears 1569 0.07 Vote: Unanimous 9. DIN~ER On motion of ~ir. Colbert, ~econded by Mr. McHale, the ~oard recessed to the Administration Building~ Room 502, for a dinner m~eting with County Volunteer Fire Chiefs. Vote: Unanimous ~iT. Warren welcomed everyone to the meeting and stated the County is fortunate for th~ profezzional work the fire departments provide. The chesterfield County velum=ear Fire chiefs me= with tho Beard of Supervimors for a ~inner meeting and District Chief Fr~nois A. Miller of the ~idle~hian Fire Department reviewed volunteer operations including fire responses; emergency medical ~ervloe responses; and safety performance. He them reviewed i~sues end requests for the volunteer fire departments including funding ~or replaoement cf throe CF i~18~i~ Mack Model 1,~00 gallon tankere; funding fox ccmplegion of a radio ~ower si:e for ~he eouthwe~t guadrant of the County; and funds being appropriated to accelerate fire apparatus ~eplacement. Discussion, comments, and questions ensued relative to the equipment replacement ~chedule; the ¢o~t of a replacement a~Droxlmately $2.5 million; the cost of the radio tower site; medical service average call time increasing in the future; and safety perfoz~ance results. Mr. Warren e~pre~d appreciation for th~ opportunXty to meet with the F~re Chiefs. It wa~ gensrally agreed to reces~ to the Public Meeting Room Reoonvening: Mr. Warren introduced Reverend Nail Wheeler, Chester Christian Church, who gave the invocation. usltsd ~tute~ of America. There were no Resolu~iun~ and Special Reoogni=icns scheduled at thie time. 14. PUBLIC mEARINGS There were no ~ublic ~earings scheduled a2 this time. In Clover ~ill Magisterial District, JA~ES HUBBARD r~qu~stmd ressning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (C-3) of 1~.0 acres an~ Light Industrial (I-1) of 14.98 auras. Retail a~d office/warehouse uses are planned. However, with the approval of this request, o~her community business and light industrial u~e~ would be permitted. The density of such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions er Ordinamce standards. The Comprehensive Plan designat~ the property for regional mixed us~ uses. This request lies on a total of ~9.98 acres fromting approximately 1;818 feet on west line of Genito Place, also fronting approximately 513 feet on t~e north line Of Genito Road, and located in the ~ap ~-1 ~1) Parcel 32 (~heet 1~). 93-717 10/27/93 MD. ~a¢obson pre.anted a summary Of Ca~e 93SN0255 and stated the Planning Commission and staff recommends approval ~nd acceptance of the proffexed conditions. Me noted the request conform~ to the UDDer Swift C~sek Plan. Mr. James ~ubbard stated the recommendation wa~ acceptable. There was ne opposition present. On motion of Mr. Warren~ seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board approved Came ~35N025§ and accepted the following proffered conditions: 1. The me×imam density of this development shall b~ 150,000 ~quare feet of ~hopping center and l~0,000 ~quare feet of light industry or equivalent densities es approved by the Transportation Depart~ent- 2. Prior to site plan approval, forty-five (4~) feet of right of way on th~ nort~ ~ide of Genito Road, ~es~ured from the centerline of that part of ~enito Road immediately adjacent to the property, shall be dedicated, fre~ and unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County. 3. There ~hall be no direct access to Genito Road until a raised median is constructed along Genito Read ~o limit the aoue~ to right t~rn~ in and right turns out only. This access shall be generally located towards the western property line. Th~ exact location of this access and the length of the raised median along Genlto Road shall be approved by the Transportation Department. complete development, the developer shall be responsible for the ~ellowing: A. Construction oS additional pavement along Genito Road at its intersection with Genito Plase to provide left and right turn lanes. Construction of an additional lane s~ pavement along Genito Place for th~ entir~ frontage of the C~3 tract. C. construction of additional pavement along Genits Road at the approved acoe~ locate~ toward~ the western property line to provide a right turn lane. D. Full cost of traffic signalization, if warranted as determined by the Transportation Department, at th- G~nito Place/Genito Road intersection. E, Dedication to the County cf Chasterfi~ld~ free and unrestricted, any additional right of way (or easement) required for the improvements identified 5. Prior to any site plan approval, a phasing plan for required road improvements identified in p~offerad condition 4 shall be submitted to and approved by the Transportation Department. 6. NO timbering or clea~inq in conjunction with development o~ thio property will occur an~il appropriate erosion edition cf the Virginia Erosion and sediment control Handbook. 93-71s 10/27/93 7.. Prior to obtaining a building permit, one of the following shall be accomplished for fire protection: A. The owner, developer or assignee(S) shall pay to the county $150 per 1,o00 square feet of gross floor area adjusted upward or downward by the same percentage that the Marshall Swift Building COSt and the date of payment. With the approval of the County's Fire Chief, the owner, deYeloper or assignee(s) shall receive a credit toNard the which is included as a part of the development. The ewner~ developer or assignee(e) shall provide a fire suppression system not otherwise required by law which the County's Fire Chief determines substantially reduces the need for County facilities otherwise necessary for fire protection. The publis water and wastewate~ system shall be u~ed. 9. Ail b~ildinq~ within th~ C-3 portion of the property shall be constructed of briok and or wood siding ~imilar to the brick ~nd wood-sided buildings located in Brandermill Tra~% Cen~er and Nu~roo Exooutive Center. Further buildings ~hall have pitched or sloped roof troatmonts un all elevations. lQ. No nigh~ olub ~hall ~e permit=ed. 94~ND108 In ~ermu~s Magisterial District, CO~STANeE H. FI~KLER requested rezening from Residential (R-7} ts Neighborhood Office (O-l). A travel agency is planned. ~owever, with tho approval of this request, the propsrty could be developed for other neighborhood office uses~ offlc~ an~ commercial use of up to 5,000 square feet per acre is permitted in a Neighborhood office (Q-i) District. The Comprehensive Plan desig~ate~ the property for mixed use: neighborhood office and single family residential use. This request lies on a 1.4 acr~ parcel known as 3523 West Hundred Road. Tax Map 11S-4 (1) Parcel 2~ Mr. Jacnbson presented a summary of Case 94SN0108 and stated the Planning Commission and ntaff recommend~ approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions. He noted the request conforms to the Chester VillaS. Mr. Dean ~a~ki~, representing tho applicant, ~tated the recommendation was acceptable. Thsre was no opposition On motion cf Mr. MsHale, seconded by Mr. Colbert, ~ha ~uard approved Case 94SN0108 and accepted the followinq p~offer~d ~ondition~: 1. ~rior to expansion of the square footage area eS the axis%inU building located at 35~3 We~t ~undr~d Road~ also known as Tax ~ap Nc.: 115-4 (1) ~8~ the owner, developer, or assignor,s) shall pay to the County $150 per 1,o00 square feet of gross floe~ area adgusted upward or downward by the ~ame ~ercentage that the ~$-719 10/27/93 d~r~a~ed between 30 June 1~91 and the date of paymmnt. With the approval of the County's fi~e c~ief, the owner, developer or assignas(s) shall recaiYe a credit tower4 the required payment for the cost of any fire ~uppre~iDn ~y~tem n~t c~kerwise required by law which im included as m part Of the Prior to ~ita plan approval, forty-five (45) f~t of right of way alanq the south ~id~ of Route l0 measured from the oenterline of that part of Route 10 immediately adjacent to the property ~hall be dedicated, unrestricted, to and for the baneful of Chemterfleld County. t~e County of Chesterfield. Vote: Unanimous 93~N0232 In ~t0aca Magisterial District, RICH~40~D C~LU~AR TELEPHONE COM~/~Y requested a Conditional Um~ Planned D~velopment to ~ermit a 300 foot ca~mmunioat~on~ tower and setback exceptions in an Agricultural (A) District. Th~ d~n~ity of amendment will be oontroll~d by zanln~ conditions or 0rd~nan~e ~tandard~. The Comprehensive Plan de~iqnates the property for regional mixed u~e. This requs~= l~es on a acre ~arcel fronting approximately 1~ fuet on ~e east lin~ of Dry Bridge Road, approximately 1~600 fast south of Midlothian Turnpike. Tax M~9 14 (1) Part$ of Parcels 105 and 106 (sh~t 6). Mr. Jacobsen presented u uummu~y Of Case 93SN0232 and stated the Planning Commission and staff race.ends approval subject condition submitted by the applicant, prior to the meeting~ regarding the developer resolvinq any interference wi~ the 6 present. suspended its rules at thi~ time and accepted th~ proffered condition submitted by the applicant. approved Case 93SN0a3~ subject to the following conditions: 1. ~ere sh~iI b~ no signs permitted to identi~y thi~ [6) foe= ~i~ Senoe, designed to preclude =respamsing. A detailed plan depicting th~s requirement shall submitted to the Planning Department for approval in conjunction with final ~ite plan review. copy of FAA approval ~hall be submitted to the Planning Department. (~) 4. The tower and egulpment =hall be deeigned and in=tailed es a~ not to interfere with the Chesterfield County Publio Safety Trunked system. The developer shall p~rfor~ an engineering study to determine poes~bility of radio frequency interference with the the study shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Chesterfield County communications and Electronle~ staff. 5. The developer shall be responsible for correcting any frequnnoy problems whioh affect the Chesterfield County Public Safety Trunked System caused by this use. Such corrections shall be made immediately upon notification by the Chesterfield County Communications and ~leetrsnies staff. 6. ThE color and llghtinq system for the tower ~hall be as follows: a. The tower shall bE grey G= another neutral oolor, ecs=pt=bin to the Planning Department. b. Medium imteneity strobe lights with upward reflection may be uged during dayllgh~ heur~. c. Soft blinking red lights shall be used during night-tine hour~. Ail driveways and perking areas shall b~ gravEllEd er paved and maintained =o m~n~mize dust problems end 8. Any building or mechanical equipment shall Qemply with $~ctien Z1.1-248 ef the Zoning Ordinance relative to ar=hitectural treatment of building exteriors and sere=sing cf mechanical equipment. (NOT=: This condition would require the ~creening of mechanical equipment located on the b~ilding or ground from adjacent properties and public rights of way. Screening would not be r~quire4 ~cr the tower or tower- mounted equipment,) 9. in conjunction with the approval cf this request, the following exceptions shall be granted: a. IS0 foot exception to the 150 foot height limitation. TWenty-five (25) foot exoeption tO the seventy-five (751 foot front yard setback requirement. f~rt~er, the Board accepted the following proffered condition: Th~ ~eveloper will resolve any inter£erEnce with the 6 gig=hertz microwave path between the VEPCO Midlothian tower and the V~P¢0 Inn~brook tower which its cellular tower or equipment may eau~e~ Vote: In Bermuda Magieteri~l District, BARNEY K~L~UGHLIN requested ConditiQnal U~ to per~it outdoor recreational facilities for boat slips end a boat ramp in an Agricultural [A) District. The density of such am=ndmen% will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance ~tandards. Thm Comprehensive Plan designates the property for residential use of 1.30 units per acre or l~se. This request l~es on 0.50 acre lying approximately 1,050 feet off th~ south llne of Bnen Church Road, approximately 2,790 fe~t west Of Point of Rock~ Road. 1~5-14 (5) Cameron Par~, Parts of Lots 59, 60 and 61 (sheet Mr. Jacobsen presented a summary of Case 9~0~$$ and ~tated Mr. McHale has requested a thirty-day deferral. ~r- ~cNale stated he is requesting a thirty-day d~fe~ral tn provide an opportunity for him to discuss ~etails of the request with ~h~ Applicant. Mr, Barney HoLaughlin state~ he i~ in agreement with the dnforred Case 93SN0233 until November 23, 199~. Vote: Unamimoe~ requested a Conditional Use to permit a family day =ar~ home in a R~siden~ial (~-7) Dimtrict- The density of such amendment will be controlled ~y zoning conditions or p~operty for Residential use of 1-51 to 4.0 units per acre. Tuukwiltow Drive. Tax MAp 65-2 (~) Land of Pinem, sectlon A, Sloe× K~ LO~ 13 (Sheet ~). Planning commission r~ue~endin~ denial and ~taSf expressed regarding eafety hazards u£ a nearby ditch. development skills she receives; that he laels approval of this request would set an example of what is right with environment to care for children; and he is happy to be a regardless of race. home for approximately one year; that as a parent, he has e~perionced prebl~m~ with daycar~ in the past; that h~ explicitly trumt~ the care of him ~on to the applicant; that 93-722 10/27/93 :he =hil~ren are well auperviae~; and he also feslm that people need to learn to get along together regardless of MS, Linda smith introduced her daughter, Jamie~ who attends the daycare home and each voiced support c~ the applicant's request. Ms. smith stated the applicant provides quality ears to her daughter; that the Appli~An~ has a small, close- knit family who assists ~n the care of the children; that the Applicant has the necessary skills to provide for the number of children requested; and she would like there to be more daycare hemes similar to this one in thc County. Ms. Nancy shlflett stated she resldss in the neighborhood children ~nsupervised; And she feels the applicant should be Ms, bridget Mopsen stated she is the applicant's sister and of the neighborhood supports this request. being provided in the neighborhood. ~r. Daniel stated he discussed this requ=st with the applicant after tho Planning Commission met and he feels the applicant i~ providing A neighborhood service and the neighbors support the request and have expressed a high reqard for the family. He noted the hom~ i~ ~it~ated on an oversized lo~ an~ ~tated the Board ha~ approved thes~ types th~ Board to approve Cas~ 949N011~ subject to the following con~it£ons: L. ~obson and shall not be tran~ferabl~ nor run with the land. (P) not exceed twelve (12}. other than the applicant and limited to no more than one (1) person. existing struc~ur~ to accommodate this uss. (P) 4. There ~hall b~ no s~gm~ permitted to identify this use. feels this request is ~ unique ~i%uation and should be of this re,est ~ould not set a precedent and, therefore, he ' supports the reguest. Mr. Warren then called for the vote, on the motion made by Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Colbmrt, fQ~ the Board to approve L. Hebron an~ shall not b~ transferable nor run with the land. 93-723 10/27/93 Vote: The number of children permitted ~t any one time ~h~ll not exceed twelve {12). Other than the applicant and her immediate family m~bor~, the number of employees involved in the operation at any erie time shall he limited to no more than one (~) person. There shall be ne additions or al%~rations to the existing structure to accommodate this Use. (P) Th~r~ nba11 be no signs permitted to identify this use. 948N0127 In Midlothian Magisterial District, HOMEOWNERS INC. requested a~etdment to a previously granted rozonlng (cas~ $95N0~0~) to delete a conditien requiring signs to comply with Emerging Growth District standards. The density of such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan designates the pro,arty £or office use. This request lies in a Dm~es~ (C-~) District on a 9.8 acre parcel known as 138O ~uguenot Road. Tax Map 16-S {1) Parcel 56 (sheet Mr. William Pool~, Chief of Development Review, presented a summary of Case 94SN01~? and stated the Planning Commission recommends approval amd acceptance o£ a proffered condition and ~taff recommends denial. Mr- Bill 3ohn~ r~presenting the applicant, stated the Planning Co~mmlon's recommendation was acceptable. ~r= was no opposition the con~ent agenda including t~e initial neighborhood involvement, t~e proffered condition to re,ire moro stringent sign controls, an~ the work of t~ Planning commission's sign Co~ittea, who reoo~en4ed considerably l~s signag~ for this location ~han the applicant requesting. He statmd ~he Sign Committee ha~ mupported a change to their draft Zoning Ordinance amendment which is wi~him five (5) percent of the Planning co~ismion~ reco~ndation on this rsquest. ~r. ~arb~r than mad~ ~ motion~ seconded by Mr. Colbert, following proffered condition: With the exception of signs for the buildlng shown service Merchandise on the plan~ prepared by J. K. Timmons and Associates, dated February 16~ 1995~ shall comply with Emerging Gro~ District standards. allowing e~ectlon of build~ng-nounted signs for the ~ize permitted by the Zoning Ordinance~ no buildln9- Service Merchandise in ~x~ of an aggregate area of Vote: Unanimous Mr, Warren stated the Beard has received numerous phons calls from citizens regarding Halloween being on a Sunday this y~ar appropriate to take action to change the date of when the of ~allow~en is a neighborhood choice and suggested citizens contact thslr nelgh~orhoed c~vla a~noiations to mutually agree on when Halloween would be celebrated in their neighborhood. 16. ;~XTOI~NM~NT On motion of Mr. McHele, seconded by Mr. Colbert, the Board adjourned at 7:40 p.m. until October 29, 1993 5t 8:30 a.m. Esr a regional summit with sfficials from the Counties of Hanover and Henri~o and the City of Richmond to be held ut the Police Academy in Richmond to discus~ crime issues. A~thdr S. Warren Chairman