Loading...
02-09-94 MinutesHiNUTE~ Whaley M. Colbert, Chairman Harry G. Daniel Mr. Lane B, Ramsey County Administrator Mr. Craig Bryant, Dir., Utilities MS. re,ri Burgess, Interim Dir., News & Public ~nfcr~stion M~. Jane Carter, Dir., Housing MS. MarilyD Col~, Asst. to County Admin. Mr. William D. Building Official Chief Robert L. Ean~s, Jr., F~re Department Mr. Michael Gelden, Dir., Par~9 and Reereatioh Mr. ~radford ~. Deputy Ce. Admin.~ Management services Mr. Ruuuell Harris, county Mr. William H. Howell, Dir., General services Mr. Leu Lasslter, Dir., Internal Audit Dr- Bart Lows, Dir., Mental Health/Mental R~tardation/$~b~tanca Abuse Dir., Accounting Mr. Robert L. Masden, Deputy Co. Admin., Human Services Mr. R. John MeCraeken, Dir., Transportation Mr. Richard M. McElfish, Dir., Env. Engineering Mr. Steven L. Micas, County Attorney Mr. Glen Peterson, Dir., Community Diversion Incentive Program Ms. Theresa M. Pitts, Clerk to the Mr. Jams5 J. L. Ste~aier~ Dir., Budget ~ ~anagemen% ~r. M. D. Stith, Jr., Deputy Co. Admin., Community Development Mr. Frederick willis, Jr., Mr. Colbert called the regularly ~¢heduled meeting t~ Qrd~r at 3:00 p.m. On motlun of Mr. Warren, seconded by ~r. ~c~ala, the Beard approved the minutes of January 26, 1994, as amended. Vote: Unanimous 2. COIrNTY ~DMI~I~TRATOR,S COMMENT~ There were ne County Administrater~ Comments at this time. 3. BOARD COEI(ITTEE REPORTS ](r. Warren noted Mr. Colbert, Mr. McHale, and Nr. Daniel made remarks at the public hearing on February ~, 19S4 regarding the Board's official position in opposition to ~cuse Eill ~9, introduced by Delegate John Watkin~, regarding a proposed regional ~cvernm~nt. He further s~ated ha held him constituents meeting on February 7, 1994 with the topic of discussion being the budget. Mr. Daniel sta~ed he attended the Metropolitnn Economic Development Council's (MEDC) annual luncheon meeting on February 3, 1994 in which MEDC announced a private/pUblic partnership for economic duvelopment goals in central virginia and briefly reviewed the positive economic activities in the Richmond metropolitan area, ~r. Barber stated hc was a 9~e~t speaker at Virginia Quality Education and Science and Technology for the Department of Education on January 2~, 1~94~ that he attended a meeting with the Salisbury Homeowners Association on February 2, 1994; that he wa~ ~ guest speaker at the Bon Air/Midlothian Lions club on February 3, 1994; that he attended the "Black Hi~tory Month" celebration at Virginia State University on February 4, 1994; that he ettehded the grand-opening ceremony for Richmond sports; t~at ~e held ~is "Firsz Monday" constituente meeting on February ?, 1~94 with th= topic of discussion being emergency medical servioes £0r ~he county; that he a~ended ~he School Board budget public hearing on February S, 19~4; that he attended th~ R~gienal Crime Commission inaugural mme=ing on February 9, 19947 that his ne×t "First Monday" constituents meeting wall be h~ld on ~aroh 7, 1994 with the topic of discussion being the Shrir~c/Swell Soil citizen Assistance School's Social Studies class on February ~3, 1994; that he will be a guest speaker at the Robious Elementary School PTA on February 24, 1994; that he will be attending the Midlothian YMCA SteeFi~g Committee ~eeting on February 21, 1994; and that he will be attendin~ a Sesame Street Pap Program Co~ittee meeting on February 10, 1994. M~ sarber then disclosed his employment as a teacher for the Chesterfield County School System and staled since a large portion of the County's budget is devoted to education~ he will De faced wiS~ many school relate~ issues as a Board member and he feels his experience au an educator will provide insight to ~h~ Board that will further enhance debate on matters the ~chool System. He further stated the Board will be making un appointmen~ ~o ~he School Board from ~he Ridlothian thi~ year, that the Virginia Conflict of Interest Act provides that he i~ legally permitted to participate and vote on issues which affect nchool employ~, and he feal~ he i~ able school-related matters ~hat will come before ~he Board. t~en stated it i~ ~is intentio~ to Continue to participute fairly an~ obj~c=ively in ~=huol mat~ers as a member 0f Boar~ of Supervisors. He submitted into the record a COpy of N~r. Mc~ale stated he attended a meeting with the River Task attended a meeting with the Uefferson Davie ~ighway ~roject planning group regarding the village the Chester; and that he attended the "Black Mistery MOnth" celebration at virginia $tat~ university. Mr. Colbert ~ta%ed he attended and participated in the "Black Mimtery Month" celebration at Virginia State University on February 4, 199~; ~hat ke attended the grand-op~ning ceremony for Richmond Sports and acknowledged the participation Of members of the ~ichmond ~ymnasti~ Club and %he Virginia Karate Club; that he attended th~ Crater MPO and ApDsmatte~ Basin Industrial Development Corporation meetings; that he mttesded the Febcua~y 8, 1994 General Assembly public hearin~ regarding Houee Bill $~; that he m~%ended various meetings with the Committee on the Future, and ~he SGheel ~omrd. 4. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ~TION, EMERgeNCY ADDITIONB~ OR OH~N~EE IN TEE ORDER OF PRESENTATION On motion of Ftc. Mc~ale, meconded by ~r. Warren~ the board deferred Item 10., an ~x~cutive Session Pursuant to Se=ties 2.1-344(A)(3)~ code of virginia, 1950, as Amended, for Consultation with Legal couneel Regarding Acquisition of Real E~tate for a Public Purpose in the Bermuda Ma~imterial District un~il March 9, 19~4 and submitted additional information for Item 16.D., a Public Hearing to Consider the Virginia Departmen~ of Transportation~s E¥9~ Enhancement Projects and, adopted the agenda, as amended. Vote: Unanimous 5. RESOLUTION~ ~ND SPECIAL RECOENITIONS O EECOSNIZING KEEP CHESTERFIELD CLEAN CORPORATION ME~BERS 5.A. F~R. JAMES P. DBBIASB ~.B. F~q. LUTHER STRINGHAK ~e. Sueen Craik~ E~ten~ion Agent for the Ccunty'~ Extenmimn $~r~ice, ~tated the Board is recognizing Mr. 3ames P. DeBiaee, repreeent~ng Bermuda District~ and Hr. L~ther Stri~ha~, representing Midlothian Dietrict, for their ~ervlce to the ~eep Chesterfield clean Corporation, She introduced Mr. stringham and stated Zr. DuRia=u wa~ unable to be present at the meeting. Mr. Barber p~esented a Cartlficat~ Of Appreciation to Mr. Stringham and expressed appreciation for his service to the Keep Chesterfield Clean Corporation. ~- Craik accepted, on behalf of Mr. DeBiase, e Certificate of Appreciation recognizing his service to the Keep Chcsterfield Clean Corporation. 94-s6 6, WORK ZBZZIONZ 6.A. PA/~KZ AND RE~EATION~ASTER PLAN Mr. Golden s=ate~ annual ett~ndanoe of County parks~ gyms and school facilities exceeds approximately three million visits and approximately 35,000-40,00Q adult and youth participate in sport program~ each year. ~a e×promsed appreciation to the Board for support of the Perks and Recreetion progrems. He then stated th~ proposed Plan directs park acquisition and development through 2010 in a manner consistent with projected growth patterns far the County, When asked, he stated fees generated through the verious leagues do not go throuqh the County treasurer but rather tu the specific league. He then presented an overview cf the prcpoe%d Pa~R~ and ReCreation Master Plan including the history of Parks and Rnnreatinn in the Co~ty; the two main issues of the proposed Plan being facility development and land acquisition; and the available natural, cultural, and historical resources available in the Cu~ty. There was brief discussion rela~ive to Pocehontas State Park being one of the County's resources as it relatem to the Plan and the possibility of developing a regionel perk site on Mr. Selden continued to reviu~ the ~lan including his=erie resources; school athletic facilities} existing parks; end projected population growth in the County. He noted the Pa=ks and Recreation Department conducted a telephone survey which concluded ~hat approximately 7~ percent of households have been involved in parks and recreetion programs or have visited the facili=ie=. When asked, he etated Parks and Recreation stuff designed the survey. He continued to review the Plan including frequency of facility usage; ~acili%y use Dy edult perticipation; fecility de~end; and new facilitie~ and services. He s~a~ed approximately 20-30 percent of citizens feels the County should uffer other types o~ serviCeS ~uoh ~s swiz~ming pools, community centers, ~queetrian centers, greenways, and golf coursm~ and noted greenways and community centers were the mos~ heavily in demand. There was brie~ disuuauion relative =o the survey and the p~rcentage of citizens in favor of an equestrian center. Mr. Colber~ noted he has received approximately nineteen phone calls in support of an equestrian center. Mr. Warren indicated h~ ha~ had similar re~ponses from his constituents. Mr. Golden t~en reviewed t~e Plan relative to sports end recreation facility standards. Discussion, comments, and gusstisns ensued relative to whether the sports and recreation facility etenderds represents a combination of both public and private sectors; the proposed Plea not specifying whether the public er priuete sector will build particular facilities; private individuals or ~roups building facilities, such es & golf course, with or without the proposed Plan; the concept of the ~olf Courses in the proposed Plan; and th= basis of planning factors epplying to the County in relation to the proposed Plan. ~r. ~c~ule requested ~=uff to submit information to the Boerd on the origination and source of the planning factors u~ed in developing the proposed Plan. There was brief discussion reletive to the nunber of priYate swim, lng pools located in the County; ~he number of pool memberships; and the s~andards for ice skating rinks. 94-$7 2/9/94 Mr. Golden then r~viewed the Plan relative to park acreage standard& including ac~u~itlon of historic sites and donation Discussion, comments, and ofuestions ensued relative to the 25 percent increase in planning factors ae it relates to the park acreage standards; Hsnricus Park and E10pingtcn Plantation b~ing acquired through donations; the County's intention being not to buy forested areas or historic sites; and ~he public hearing scheduled this evening to aonsider the Plan and staff requesting the Beard to sdnDt the Plan as part o~ the County's ~r. ~elden then reviewed the Plan r~lativ~ to projected sport and recreation facilitie~ needs. consider building communXty center gymnasiums separately from County. Mr~ Golden then ~eviewed projected acreage needs and lun~ acquisition Plan recommendations. There wag hrleS disaussion relative to the recommendation cf a park land acquisition program. Mr. ~old~n th~n reviewed the Plan relative tO facility development plan r=¢o~lmendations. Mr. Colbert excused himself from thc meeting. Discussion, comments, and ~uestione ~nsued relative to the project priority listing; whether there are private facilitie~ available to serve citizens involved in an equestrian program; the County providing equestrian program s~rvices to d~sabled children; whether the County would bs taking business away private e~uestrian complexes if an equestrian center is approved; and the costs and liabilities associated with an Mr. Colbert re~urne~ to th~ meeting. There was brief discussion relative to the County's comt of an when determining what types of facilities the County pruvide~. ~ then reviewed service radius of parks including the County maintaining lO acres uf Dark land per 1,000 residents to provide sufficient facilities in meeting resident needs. ~r. ~tegmaier reviewed the budget calendar including the Board authorizing the advertisement of t~e tax rates~ scheduling the budget public hearing; and adopting the budget by the ~oard of Board Of Supervisors would bare adequate ~ime ~o hold an additional public hearing if they d=cide to ruadvertise the tax including population and revenue percentage change~; FY95 prujeoted General Fund r~venues; and analysis of changes in 94-88 ~I9194 the hotel/motel category was the most affected. There was brief discussion r~lative to ~he evaluation of a hotel/motel being based on revenue generated and not the actual Mr. S=eqmaier stu%e~ =here is a $321 million increase in =he total value of property, which increase will generate additional revenue for the County for next year. He then reviewed changes in real estate assessed value from 19~5-9~ and stated there is a slight increase in property values. There was brief discussion relative to the real e~tate asse~ed value reflecting inflation and new growth and the revaluations for residential/agricultural being due to inflation. ~r. Ste~aier continued to review changes in real estate tax rate increased from $1-03 in ~988 tu $1-09 in 1989. He then reviewed percent of assesse~ value for commercial/ industrial real so=ate between 1985-94. Kr. Warren requested staff to submit to the Board the total dollar amount invested in =he county between 1985-94 for commercial/industrial real estate and noted the impact the decline in the economy has had on the patten= of assessed value for commercial/industrial real estate for jurisdictions. Ke requested staff =o detail footnotes on the ~rnDhs outlining any factors which may have contributed to the decrease in amge~sed value such ns the DuDent Plant fire last year. There was brief discussion relative to a comparative study being conduote~ of the County and surrounding jurisdictions to detail the reasons for the decline in the percent of assessed value for commercial/indus=riel real estate over the past Mr. Stegmaier then reviewed single-family building permits on a calendar year basis b~tween 19~Q-94; changes in personal property tax revenue between FY85~957 new car registrations between FY$~-9~! changes in local sales ~axes between FY85~95; is anticipating approximately $4.1 million more than what was included When th~ Boar~ adopted ~he budget last year. H~ further stated staff will recommend, when the budget is presented =o t~e Boar~, t~at $1 million of the $4.1 million surplus be added to Fund Balance to cover Fund Balance for 1995 at 7.5 percent; to set aside the remaining amount to be used for on.-time capital ~xp~ndituren on a nonrecurring basis; end to transfer 7~ percent of the property tax surplu~ allo~ated to the School budget for one-time capital expenditures. Mr. Ramsay clarified staff will submit this recommends%ion ab action is necessary at this tine. Mr. eta=meier noted the balance of tkose funds will be available to General Fund operating departments for one-time nonrecurring types of cost. There was brief dlsuussion relative to =he use of surplus funds for Schools beiu~ $1.4 million and the Ceunty being $1.~ million and the amount cf food stamps as it relates to the Mr. Step~aier then reviewed the impact of revenue trends for FY95; the county sMperiencing positive growth in revenues for real estate, personal property, and property taxes with a $13 94-89 2/9/94 million increase in all ef the tam revenue and $2 million in~rea~e in food ~tamps, with a total $17.5 million increase in current year sources of revenue, which is a 6.5 percent assessed value on revaluations being one percent as it relates to an increase in the tax rat~- Mr- Stegmaier then reviewed uses of new funds for FY95; FY95 projected General Fund transfer to schools; and local t~ansfer ~o s~hools ~$ per~ent of general property t~xes. schools bein~ an increase in actual dollars over the past several years; the amount of funds ~p~nt per pupil; and the debt service level in the County being higher than other jurisdictions. There were no ~ef~rred Items scheduled at this time. Mr. Micas stated there ie an error in the agenda item which indicates the purpose of establishment of u Charter Review CoI~ittee would be to review the Charter in its entirety. He further stated upon review of the motion mad~ at the January 26, 1994 m~=ting, the intent of the motion is to have the Charter Review Committee exclusively review Sshosl Board ~erms in relationship to Board of Supervisor~ terms. He stated if ~he ~oard of Supervisors wishes to establish the Committee as it relate~ to School Board appointments, staff recommends the ~osrd establish the committee and appoint members accordingly. Mr. Ramsay stated staff is r~commending two members be appointed from eac~ district to serve on the char~er Review committee. Mr. McEale stated he feels the opportunity to review the Charter should be more flexible than restricting itu review tO SChoOl ~oard appointments a~d he ~eels Citizen input should De received regarding the melection proces~ of School 5card Mr. Barber stated he feels if the soard establishes the Committee, the Charter should be reviewed in its entirety and indicated he could support approval of the item as presented. Mr. McHale made a motion for the Board to establish the Charter Review Committee with the direction of the committee being to review school ~oard terms running concurrently with ~oard of they feel need te be addreseed. Nr. Barber secended the ~otion. Mr. Daniel mtated the purpose of establishing a Charter Review Com~itta~ is not in accord with the minutes Of the December 15, 1993 meeting, He further ~tated establishment of the co~ittee originated £rem a discussion of whether or net the Charter should be emended to allow for concurrent 6~rmu of School Bourd members with ~oard of Supervisors terms and the motion was %0 bring the issue beer to the Board to develop a committee to review the Charter, addressing specific Soheol Board issues. Xr. Daniel then made a substitute motion for the Board to emtabli~h a Charter Review Committee with the direction of the Committee being to &ddres~ only the school ~oard term isaue and the preces~ for appointment as outlined in the current Charter. He ~ndloated if there are specific issues relating to the Charter that ne~d to be reviewed, the Board could address those issues accordingly. Mr. Warren seconded the motion. ~r. Barber ~tated he feels the Committee should review i~sues concerning the Charter other than the ~chool Board concurrent ~. Daniel stated public input wss received at the December lS~ 1993 public hearing regarding this proposed Charter amendment and he feels the Coia~ittee should only address the SChool Board concurrent term i~sue at this time. Mr. McMele stated ha feels th~ ~oard should move forwurd on the issue of concurrent terms for ~chool Board member~ and ~larifi=d the intent of his mo=ion b~ing that in the course of th~ Committ~'~ d~lib~rations, if issues arise that warrant further consideration by the Board of Supervisors or another ~r. Warren s%a~ed he supports ~r. Daniel~ muDmtitute ~otion ~nO indic~te~ that after the School Board concurrent term issue is addressed, the Board could empower the Co~ittee to discuss o~her Charter issues. by Mr. Daniel~ seconded by Mr. Warren, for the Board to ~tablinh the Charter R~view Committee with the direction of th~ Co~ittee being to addres~ the issue of School Beard members terms running concurrently wit~ Board of Supervisors members terms and the procem~ for appointm%nt as outlined in Ayes: ~r. colbert, ~r. Daniel, ~n~ Mr. Warren. Nays: Mr. Mc~ale and Mr. Barber. ~. Daniel nominat%d M~. N~nc~ Hudson and Ns. Beth Dunk~ to s~rve on :h~ Char%ar Review Committee, representlnq Sale District. (It is noted formal appointment for Ms. ~udson and ~s. Bunkum will bm considered at the February 23, 199& ~eeting and consideration of nominations for memb~=~ to servm on the Charter R~view Committee, representing Bermuda, Clov~r Hill, Matoaca, and Midlothian Districts was deferred until February 23, 1994.] INDUSTRIAL D~LOPHENT AUTHORITY ~r. Warren stated ~r. Tommy Hawkins, representative for Clover Hill District on the IndUstrial Development Authority, resigned £rom the Authority ~ue ts relocation. He thee nominated Mr, Bill Barthlow to fill the unexpired term vasated by Mr. ~awkins 94-91 2/9194 to the Industrial Development Authority, representing Clever Hill District. Mr. Warren %hen made a motion for the Board to suspend its rule~ at this time to allow simultaneous nomination/appointment of a ~mmber to serve on the Industrial Development Authority. Vote: Unanimous simultaneously nominated/appoln~e~ Mr. sill Barthlow, Development Authority, whose term will ba ~ffective immediately and expire June 30, 1996. Vote; unani~0us CONSENT ITEMS s.c.1. ~DCPTIOW OF RESOLUTION REQUESTIN~ THE VIRGINIA adopted the following resolution: received requests to s~pport the retention o~ the existing Road (Route 677). Department of Transportation is requested to retain the existing traffic signal at t~i~ intereeotion, FIN~/~OING BONDEr SERIES 1994A After brie~ di~=us~ion, on motion o~ Mr. Warren, u~co~de~ by Mr. Mc~ale, the Board adopted the followin~ resolution: RESOLUTION OR TH~ BOARD OF SUF~RVTSORS OF THE COUNTY OF CH~$T~RFI=LD, VIRGINIA AUTHORIZING T~E COUNTY AD~TNISTRATOR TO APPLY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROCEEDS OF THE 1991 VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY BONDS (1991 R~SOLUTION) S=RI~S 1994A TO SE %BSUED IN A~RIL, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors [the "Board") e~ the County of chesterfield, virginia (t~e "county'~) has determined that it is advisubl~ for the County to apply to the Virgi. ia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") to participate in the proceeds of the School Financing Bonds (199~ Resolution) Serie~ 1994A to b~ issued by the V~SA in April, 19D4; and WHEREAS, ~he ~oard uon%~mplatas ~hat %he ~ur~es~ which participation i~ sought can be accomplished for approximately ~ow, T~ERE~DRE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD QF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: (21 that the county Administrator may file the necessary application with the %rPSA to participate in the 1994 Virginia Public School Authority ~on~s (1991 Reaolutlon) Saries 19~4A in a preliminary amount Of $8,126,000, for capital projects for tha ~h6~terfiold County Public Sahsol~; and (2) ~hat the law firm of HawkiDs, Delafield & Wood of New York be retained a~ Bond Counsel for this purpose. AUTHORIZATION FOR COUNTY ~DMINISTRATOR TO ENTER I~TO CONTRACT~ WiTH GOLD~R ASSOCIATES, INC. A~D ORdA/4IC WABTE TECHNOLOGIES, INC, ~OR FINAL CLOSURE OF THE NORTHERN ~-~A LA/~DFILL AND REMEDIATION OF THH On motion of NL~. Warren, seconded by Mr. McHale, the ~o~rd authorized the County Administrator to enter in~o contrauts with ~older Associate~, Incorporated and Organic Wast~ subj~=t to approval by the County Attorney. Vote: Unanimous ACCEPTANCE OF DEEDS OF TRUST ~OR MORTCAGE DOW/~PAYHENT On motion o£ Nr. Warrsn, s=conde~ by ~r. MoHste, the Seard authorized the County Administrator to accept Deeds of Tr~st as security for ~ortgage Downpayment and Closing Cost A~ziatance for th~ following participants: Joyce and Dorothy ~ranch Sharon Foust Dennis and Kimberly ParrisN 41ii River Read $ 7~4.90 52~0 Thornington Drive 1,755.73 Vote: Unanimous DATES FOR PUBLIC 8.C.a.a. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO )/4END T~E CODE O~ THB ~ENDIN~ ~/~D REENACTIN~ SECTION~ 6-4~ 7.2-9, AND ]~-68. ADDING SECTION8 8-14.~, $-$9.1 AND 12-1.4 TITLE TO ARTICLE ~III OF CHAPTER 8 Oh motion of Mr. Warren, ~conded by Mr. McHale, the Board set tha date of March 9, 1994 a% 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing to con~ider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of CheSterfield, 1978, as amended, by amending and reenacting S~ction~ 6-4, 7.2-9, ~0-34, und 20-68, adding Section~ 8-14.3, ~-5~.1, and 12-1.4 relating to ~nte~prise zones and ~hanging the titl~ to Article XIII of Chapter 8. Vote: Unanimous 2/9194 8.C.5.D. TO CONBIDER AN ORDINANCB TO ~MRND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS ~MENDED, BY ~/~NNDiNG /~ND. REEFACTING SECTION 14,1-28 R~LATING TO ISSUANCE OF ~ARKIEG TION~TS AG OPPOSED TO On motion of ~r. ~arr~n, the date of April 12, 19~ at 7:~0 p.m. for a public hearing to co,sider an ordinance to amend the CQd~ Of the County of chesterfield, 1978~ as a~nded, by amending and reenacting section 14.1-~S relating opposed to ~u~on~es for violating decal laws. Vote: Unanimous 8.~.6. ~MENDME~T TO MINUTES OF JA/qUA~Y 1~, 1994 On motion of ~r. Warren, ~¢onded by Mr. ~cHale, the Board amended the minutes of January 11, 1994 as ~kOM: '~hi~ day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with examination of ~al]ant ~o× Driv~ Gallant Fox Terrace, Kentucky Derby Drlve~ Kentucky Derby Court and Secretariat Drive in Antler Ridge, Section 5, Matoaca Di~triat. Upon considoration whereof, and on motion of ~r- eeconded by Mr. Barber, it is resolved that Gallant Fox Drive, Gallant Fez Terrace, Kentucky Derby Drive, Kentucky Derby Court and Secretariat Drive in Antler Ridge, Section 5, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are e~tablished as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to taka into Secondary System, Gallant Yuz orive extends .21 miles form the end of Route 490~ to the inter~ection of Kentucky Derby Drive. Gallant Fo2 Terrace ewtends .05 niles from the intersec~iun of Gallant ~cx Drive to the cul-de-sac. Kentucky Derby Drive extends .~7 miles from the intersection of 4700 to tie into ~entucky Derby Drive, Antler Ridge, Section 6. Kentucky Derby Court extends .QB niles from the intersection of Rentucky Derby from the intersection of Kentucky Derby Drive to th~ dead end. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance, clear zone and designated Vizginia Department of These roads serve 61 lots- guarantee~ to the Virginia Department of Transportation an TO: "This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with direetion~ from thie Beard~ made ~eport in writing upon hie examination of the roads in Antler Ridge, Section ~, Metoaca District~ and 94-94 2/9/94 Wheroa~, the Resident En~inoo~ fo~ th~ Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental Engineering, the street(s) in Antler Ridge~ Section ~, Matoaca District, meet the roquirement~ established by the Subdivision Street R~uir~ments of the Virginia D~partment of ~ranspertation, Whereas, the Csunty and the Virginia DeDartment of Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed Book 2453, Page 405, January 21, 1994, for all stor~ater detention/retention facilities in the County. McHale seconded by Mr. Barbe~ it i~ resolYed that the roads in Antler Ridge, Section 5, Matoaoa District, be and they hereby are e~tablished as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and is h~reby requested to ~ake into the Secondary SysTe~ pursuant to ~ection 33.1-229, Co~e of Virginia~ and th~ D~part~ent's Sub~ivislcn Street Requirements, Name of Street: Gallant Fox Drive Length: .~1 miles Prom: the end of Route To: the inter~ection of Kentucky Derby Drive Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. Name of Street: Gallant Fox Tort=ce Length: .05 mil~ Prom: the intersection of ~allant Fox To: the cul-de-sac ~uaranbeed Right-of-Way Width: 50 f~et. Name of Street: K~ntuuky D~rby Drive Length: .27 miles From: the intersection of Route 4700 To: tie into Kentucky Derby Drive, Antler Ridge, Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. Name of Street: Eentucky Derby Court Length: .08 miles From: the intersection of KenLuoky Derby Drive This request is inclusive of th~ adj$¢e~t Slope, ~ight distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainag~ ~ase~n[s iudic~te~ on the development plat. 8.C,7. STAT= ROAD ACCEPTANCE This day the county Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this 5oard~ mad~ r~p~rt in writing upon his e~emination of the roads in Thorehill, Section 1, Bermuda Distrist~ and ~4-95 2i9/94 Wheroa~, the ~oo~dsnt Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised tko Director ~[ Environmental Engineering, t~e ~treet(sl in Thornhill~ Section 1, Bermuda District, meet tko requirement~ established ~y the Subdivision ~treet Require~ent~ of the Virginia Department of Tranoportation~ 8nd Whoroao, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have eetered into an agreement, recorded in Deed Book 2453, Page ~05, January 21, 1994, for all stormwatar detention/retention facilities in the County. Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Hr. Me.ale, it is resolved that the roads in Thornh~ll, Section 1~ Bermuda District~ be and they h~reby are established as public roads. And be it further ~e~elvsd, that the Virqioia Department of Transportation, be and is hereby reques=ed to take into the Secondary System~ pursuant tc Section virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, the following: Name of Street: Thornhill Drive Length: .46 miles To: the cul-de-sac Guaranteed Variable width Right-of-way: 50 - 70 f~et. Name of Street: Farmstead Way Length: .07 miles Fro~: the intersection of Thornhill Drive Tm: the cul-de-sac Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: ~0 feet- ~ame of street: Thornhill Court Length: .05 miles F~en: the inter~ection of Thernhill Drive Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. Name of Street: Ro~khaven Drive Length: .07 ~ilea From: the intersection of Thornhill Drive To: the cul-de-sac Guaranteed Righ~-af-way width: ~0 Name of Street: Ry~took Court Len~: .O4 miles Vrom: the intersection of Thornhill Drive TO: the cul-de-sac Cuaranteed Right-of-Way Width: ~0 f~et. From: the intoroootlon of Thernhill Drive This request lo inclusive of ~he adjacent slope, sight plat. This section of Thornhill is recorded as This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance wi~ dir~otions fr~m this Soard, made report in writing upon hi~ examination of t~e ~oad~ in Thornhill, Section 2, Bermuda District, and Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Dire~t~ Of E~viroru~ental Engineering, the street(s) in ~hornhill, Section 2, ~erm~da Distrlct~ m~et the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements m~ th~ Virginia Department of Transportation, and whereas, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation ~ave entered in~o an agreement, recorded in Deed Book 2455, Page 405, January 21, 199~, for all stormwate~ detention/retention facilities in the county. Therefore, upon consideration whereof~ and on motion of ~r. Warren, seconded by Mr. ~cHale, it is resolved ~hat the roads in Thornhill, Section 2, Bermuda District, bs and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolve~, that th~ Virginia Department of Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the SeGondary System, pursuant %0 Section 33.1-229, Code of virginia, and the Department's ~ubdivision Street R=qUire~ente~ the following: Nam~ of Street: Thernhill Terrace L~n~h: .07 miles From: the intersection of Thornhill Drive To: the cul-de-sac Guaranteed ~ight-cf-~ay Width: 5Q feet. Name of Street: ThorDhill 91ace Length: .15 wiles Prom: the intersection of Thornhill Drive T~: the =ul-de-sac ~uaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. This request i~ inclusive of the adjacent slope, sigh% dlstanue, clear zone and ~euignatad Virginia Department of Tranmpartatien ~rainage easements indlcato~ on th~ d~velop~ent plat. These roadm merve 2~ lots. Thim section of Thornhill is recorded as fellows: S~ction ~, Plat Book ~1, Pages 12 & 13, May 21, 1993. This day the County Environmental Engineer, in ~ocor~anea with directions from ~hls Board, made report in writing upon big examination of the roads in Stonehenge Hills, Phases I and II~ Clever Mill District, and Whereas, th~ Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department Of Transportation has advised t~e Direc=er of ~nviro~ental Enginm~ring, th~ street(s) in Stonehenge ~ills, Phases I and II, Clover Hill Distriot~ neet the requirements established by the Subdivi~ien S~reet Re~ulr~nentm Of thm Virginia Department of ~ranapertation, and W~erean, th~ County and th~ virginia Department of Transportation have entered in~o an agreement, recorded in ~eed ~QOk ~A~, Page 405, January 2], t994, for all stor~Wate~ detention/retention facilities in the County. 94~97 ~1919~ Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Warren, ~econded by Mr. MoHale~ it is resolved that the reade in stonehenge Hills, Phase~ I and II, clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as public road~. And be it further r~olv~d, that the Virginia Department of Tranepartatlon, be and iD hereby r~quasted to take into the Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229~ Code of Virginia, and tAe Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, the following: Nome of Street: Hudd~r=fi~ld Drive L~ng4ah: .10 miles FrOm: the end of Route 2531 TO: the oul-de-sec ~uaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 60 feet. Name of Street: Hixson Drive Length: .14 mile~ From: the sad of Route 3992 To: the inter~ctisn sf Huddersfield Drive Guaranteed Right-of-Way wid=h: ~0 feet~ Name o~ street= aixson Place Length: .1~ mil~ From: the intersection of Hixson Drive Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. This request i~ in~lunive of the adjacent slope, sight distance, clear zone and designated virginia DeDartment of Transportation drainage e~sement~ indicated on the development These roads serve 23 lots. These phases of Stonehenge Hills are reoordcd a~ follows: Pha~% I, Plat Bock 60, Page 33, May 3, 1989. Vote: Unanimous This day th~ County ~nvironmental ~ngineer, in accordant= with direotieno from thio ~oard, made re~ert in writing upon hie examination of the road~ in Foxcroft, Section II, Matoaca District, and W~areas, ~he Residen= Engineer for ~he Virginia Department Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental Engineering, the street(s) in Fo×orcft, Section II, Matoacu Di~trlct, m~t th~ r~qu~r~nt~ ~tabl~h~d by th~ Subdivision Street ~quire~ente of the Virginia Department of Whereas, the County and th~ Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement, retarded in Deed Book ~&~, Bag~ ~, January ~1, ~ for all ~tormwater detention/retention fecilltiss in the County. Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Wurren, seconded by Mr. ~cHal~, it is resolved that the roads in Foxcro~t, s~u~ion %%, ~atoaca District, ~e and ~hey are established am public roads. ~d be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of TransDortation, b~ and is hereby requested to take into the Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of vlr~inia, an~ the DaDartment'~ Subdivi~ic~ Street R~quir~ments, the following: Name of Street: Fox Club Psrkway Len~rth: .12 miles From: the end of Fox Club Parkway, Foxcroft, Section 1 To: station 44+00 Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 70 feet. Name of Street: Pox Crest Way Length: .28 miles From: the intersection of FOX Club Parkway To: the e~l-de-sa¢ Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 fe~t. Name of Street: Fox Crest Place L~ngth: .07 miles From: the intersection of FOX Crest Way To: the cul-de-sac Guaranteed Right-of-way width: 50 feet. Name of Street: Fox crest Lane Length: .14 miles From: the intersection of Fox Crest Way To: the cul-de-sac Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 26 f~et. Name of Street: Fox Crest Circle Length: .07 mil~m Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet_ From: the in:srsection of FOX Crest Way To: the cul-de-sac Guaranteed ~iqht-of-Way width: 50 feet. Name of Dtr~et: Lak~ Bluff Parkway Length: .09 m~les From: the end ~f Route 4~$7 To: the intersection o~ Fox Club Parkwsy Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 70 feet. This request is inclusive of the adDacent slope, eight distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of Transportation ~rainag~ easements indicated on the development plat. Section II, Plat Book 70, Pages 98 & 99, April 30, 1990. Thio day the county ~nvi~onm=ntal Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, nade report in writing upon hi~ examination sf the reads in Hi~hberry Woods, Phase II, Marsala ~istrict, and Wherea~, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental Engineering, the ~tr~t(~1 in ~ighb~y Woods, Pha~ II, Matoaca District, neet the requirements established by the '~ubdivision Strs.t RequiremsDts of the Virginia Department of Transportation hav~ entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed detention/reYention facilities in %he County. Therefore, upon ~onsidera=ion whereof, and on motion of Mr. hereby are ~stabllmhed as public roadm. 94-99 2/9f94 And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of T~an~portation, be and is hereby requestsd to take into Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department*s Subdivision Street Requirements, the following: Name of Street: Highberry Woods Road Length: .22 miles From: the end of Route 4610 To: the cul-de-sac Guaranteed Right-o£-Way Width: §0 feet. Nam~ of Street: Hiqhberry W~ds Plam~ Length: .05 miles From: the intersection of Highberry Woods Road To: 2he cul-de-sac Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. Name of Street: Highberry Woods Drive Length: .09 miles From: the in~erse=~ion o~ Nighbsrry woods Road To: the cul-de-sac Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet- From: the intersection of Highberry Woods Drive TO: t~e intersection of ~eadow ~hase Road, Ro~te 5009 ~uarante~d Right-of-Way Width: ~O feet. Thi¢ request i~ inclusive of the adjaceut slope, sight distanze, clear zone and designated vir~in~s Department plat. This phase of Highberry Woods is recorded as follows: Pha~e II, Plat Book 72, Pages 68 & 69, September 18, 1990. Vote: Unanimous This day the County =nvironmental =ngineer, in accordance with directions from this ~oard, made report in writing upon ki~ ~amination of Ottsrdale Road end Justice Road, ~idluthian District~ and Wh~rea~! the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Director of Environnen=al Rngineering, the ~treetI~) of ©tt~rdale Road and rustics Road! Midtothian Distr~ct, meet the re~n/irements e~tabliehed by the ~ubd~vi~ion Street R~quir~ment~ of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and Whereas, the County and the Virginia BeDartment of Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Qeed Book 2453, Page 405, January 21, 1994, for all sto~mwatsr d~t~ntion/r~t~ntion facilitiem in th~ County. Therefore, upon consideration whmr~of, amd on motion Of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. McHale, it i~ resolved that ot%erdale ~oad and Justice Road, Midlothian District, be and they hereby are esta~lishe~ ss public road~. And bs it further resolved, that the Virginia Department cf Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into th~ Secondary System, Dursuant to Section 35.1-229, Code of the folluwlng: Name of Street: Otterdale Road Length: .07 ~ile~ From: ~nd of Route 970 TO: end at P~oDo~ed N. Otte~dal~ Road~ sonm~rville, Section 3 Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 60 feet. Nam~ of Street: Justic~ Road L~ngth: .20 miles From: the intersection with N. 0tterdate Road To: tie into Juotice Road, Sommerville, Section 6 Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 60 feet. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight plat. These roads serve as access to adjacent commercial properties. S.C.8. AFPROVAL OF LICenSE AGREEMENT FOR REH~BILITATIOE O~THE On motion of Mr. Warren~ seconded by Mr. NcHalet the Board approved a license agreement for the rehabilitation of the pri~ate sewer system serving the Defense General Supply Center and authorized the Chairman cf the Board and County A~ini~trator t~ ~xecute the n~ary agreement ~pOD approval by the County Attorney. (It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous ~;%RIABL~ WIDTS DRAINAGR ~AS~I4ENT ~ ~SSOOI~T~D TWENTY FOOT IN~RESB~E~RESS EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY On mo=ion of Mr. Warren, seuunded by Mr. McHale~ the Soar~ approved u r=qu=st from ~r. G=urge B. $cw=rs~ Jr., Presid=nt of GS~ ~oldi~g, Ltd., and authorized t~e c~airman of t~e ~oard and the County A~inistrator to ~xecut~ a quitclaim de~d to vacate a variable width drainage easement and associated twenty feet ingress/egress easement across property owned by ~BS Holding, Ltd. in proposed Poplar Creek, Section E. (It is noted a uopy of the plat i~ filed with the papers of t~is Board.) &.~.l~. REQUESTS FOR P~RMISSIO~ On motion cf Mr- warren~ seuend~d by Mr- HcNale, the Board concrete dumpster pad encroach within ~n existing ~0 foot sewer is noted a cody of the vicinity sketch is filed with the papers of this S~urd.) 8.C.10.h. FROM MI~. DOUSL~S R. SOWERS FOR PORTIONS OF T]~ER FOOT ~R~DG~S TO ENCROACH WITHIN TWO EXISTING EASEMENTS On motion of Mu. warren, seconded by ~r. McHale, the Board approved a request from Mr. Douglas R. Sowers to have portions of two foot bridges encroach on a drainage easement across Lot 6, St. James Woods, Section B, and a portion o~ a foot bridge encroach on an existing 2Q foot sewer e~d drainage easement acroe~ property south of future Wilson Wood Court, subject to the execution o~ two license agreements. (It is noted a copy of t~e vicinity sketch is filed with the papers of this Board.) V~te: Unanimous accepted, on b~half of the County, the conveyance of a parcel ¢o~y of the plat i~ filed with the papers of this Bomrd.] 9. REPORT~ On motion of Mr. ~c~al~, seconded by ~r. ~arren, th~ Board accepted the following Mr. Ra~sey presented the Board with a ~tatus report on C~n~ral Pond Balance; R~serve for Futur~ Capital Projects; District Read and Street Light Funds; Lease Purchases; school Board Agenda. Mr. Ramsay stated the Virginia Department of Trsnsportation has formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following roads into the State Secondary System: ADDITIONS LAND-O-FINES, SECTION A - [~ffective Route 899 (O'Bisque Drive) - From Ruut~ 2122 to Route ~124 O.09 Mi Route ~lgl (B~rOD Dr%Ye) - From Rearm ~1~ to 0.2S mile Southwest Route 2122 0.25 Mi Route 2124 (Sanohez Road) - From Route 899 to Route 2111 0.36 Route 2120 (T~skwillcw Drive) - From Route 2121 tO Route ~1~4 0.32 Mi Route 3181 (La Ro~a Road) - From ~out~ ~t22 to Rout~ 2114 0.09 Mi Vote: Unani~ou~ On motion of Mr. NcHate, seconded by Mr~ colbert, t~he Board recessed to the Administration Suilding, Room 502, for a dinner meeting with me~ber~ of th~ Social Services Board. Uote: Unanimou~ The Board of Supervisors mst with m~mbers of the Social servicsm Board to discuss concern~ and i~ua~ relating to social services including average monthly food stamps Caseloads in which ~h% County has the thizd highest rate of incr~as~ in the State; aid to families wish dependent e~ildren: average monthly caseloads for Medicaid; child protective r~f=rral~; fo~t=r care; Social Services benefit and service programs; Social Services budget ~stimate~ for year ending 31, 1994; and addi~iQnal fundln~ requests for the F¥94-95 budget. It was the general con~en=us of the ~oard tO recess to %he Public Meetim~ Room to continue the regularly scheduled meeting. Raconv~ning: X~. INVOCATION Mr. colbert is~reducsd Reverend Nail Gutmaker, Pastor of $~erbOUrne united ~ethodist Church, who gave the invocation. 13, ~LEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLA~ OF THE UNITSD STATES OF Flag of the United Sta~ee u£ America. · ~.a.~. Ms. B~TTY M, BE~ERLY Dr. bOw~ in~ruduced ~. Betty M. S~erty whu wa~ present to receive the re~elntion. On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, MS. Betty M. Beverly, representing B~r~da Magisterial District, has served as e valued and dedicated member of the Community Services Board since her appointment by ~h~ chesterfield County Board of superviser~ in May, 1988; and WH~R=AS~ Me. Beverly he~ ~srved as a community Services Chairman of the Board, and was no longer eligibl= for reappointment; and W~EREAS, Ns. Beverly is recognized as an articulate spokeswoman and advocate for mental health, ~ental retardation, and ~ubstano~ abuse services, locally and s=atewide, serving aa a member of the State ~ental Health Council; and ............. I ........ J..__..J ....... [ t / ................. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors recognizes the thoughtful guidance and uomsit~eDt d~mon~trat~d by Ms. Beverly d~ri~g her termo az a member of the Connunity Services Beard. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Dereby expresses its sincere gratitude and appreciation to Ms. Betty M. Beverly for her significant contributlena in the provision e£ quali~y mental heal%b, mental retardation, and substance abuse services to the citizens of Chooterfield County. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED~ that a copy ol this resolution ~e p~esentsd to Ms. Beverly and that thi~ re~olution be permanently recorded among the pap~r~ of thio Beard Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virqinia. Vote: UnanimQu~ Mr. McHule presented the executed resolution to Ks. Feveriy and expressed appreciation for her dedicated service ts the Community Services ~r. Lows introduced Mr. Petur C. We~d W~o was present to receive the resolution, On mo~isn of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Mr. Peter C. Ward, representing Midlothian Magisterial District, ha~ ~ervud a~ a dedicated and faithful mender of the Community services 5card since hi~ appeintmen~ by the Board of Supervisors in December, 1955; and WHEREAS, Mr- ward has m~rved with distinction as Chairman for two terms during his appointnent and wa~ no lon~er sllglbl~ for reappointmen% to the community services Board; and WH=R~$, Mr. ward, has for a number of years, been an active volunteer and concerned citizen of Chesterfield County, serving in various leadership capacities with other mental h~alth and mental retardation service advocacy srgsnizations; WHEREAS, Mr. Ward is recognized locally and throughout the Commonwealth for his steadfast dedicatio~ end genuine concern for persons with ~sntal disabilities. ~OW, TR~R~FORB BE IT RESOLVED, that the chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby expreuses its sincere gratitude and appreciation to ~r, Peter C. War~ for his commitment and significant contributions in the proviuion of ~uality mental he~lth~ mental retardation, and ~ub$%an0e abuse services to the citizens of Chesterfield County. AND, BE IT F%rRTHER R~SOLV~D, ~hat a copy of this be pe~mnently recorded amunq the papers of this Board cf SuD~rv~or~ o~ C~e~teuf~elo County, Virginia. Vets: Unanimous expressed appreciation for his dedicated service to the Community Services Board. 2/9/94 receive the resolution. On motion of th~ Board, tke following res'olution was adopted: Magisterial District, has served am a dedicated and faithful WHEREAS, Ns. Borinskl has comDlstnd two terms as a Services Board and was no longer eligible for reappointment; rncegniznd by the Chesterfield County Board of S~pa~visors. County Board of gupsrvisors hereby e~pres~es its sincere ~rutitude and ~ppraciation to Ms. Patricia Y. Borln~ki for her ~igni£ican% contributions in the provision of quality ~ental citizens ef chesterfield county. resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of t~is Boa~d cf Supervisors cf Chemtsrfield County, Virginia. Vote: Unanimous WHEREAS~ the pu~pese cf the Cemmunity Corrections correctional servlceg which meet th~ local needs of its WHEREA~, this Resouuces Doard reviews individual offender W~EREAS~ Ms. Oeloris Jack,on has faithfully and dilig~nSly Board~ and 94-lOS 219194 WHEREAS, Ms. Jackson demonstrated leadership, sensitivity, and commitment to the issues before the Co~t~unity Corrections Resources Board while serving cn the Board. NOW~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board ef supervisors hereby e×prasses its sincere appreciation to Ms, Deloris Jackson for representing the County c~ c~eeterfield through ~er service as a member of th~ Chesterfield County Community Corrections Resources Board. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of t~s resolution be presented to ~s. Jackson and that it be permanently recorded among the papers of this Bosrd of Supervisors of Ches=erfleld County, Virginia. Vote: Unanimous Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution to Me. Jackson and expressed appreciation for h~r comm~tment and leadership cn the Chesterfield/Colonial Height~ Community Corrections Resources Board. B~ UPON ATTAINING ~ OF EAGLE SCOUT On motion of the ~oard, the folluwing resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, t~e Bey SCOU~S of America was incorp0r~ted by ~r. William D. Boyce on February $~ 1910; and ~EREA$, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote nitizonship training, personal development, end fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in e leadership position in a troop, carrying out u service project beneEicial to hi~ community, boing active in th~ troop, d~monstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and WHEREAS, Mr. Elmer Frederick Sohumaeher, Iv, Troop sponsored by saint Edward's Catholic Church, has these high standards of commitment and has reached the lone- percent of those individuals entering the S=uuting movement; WHEREAS, g~owing through ~Ls experiences in scouting~ learning =he lee=one of responsible citizenship, and priding ~imself on the great accomplishments of hi~ County~ Elmer is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. ~OW, TH~REFOR~ B~ IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby e~tend= i~s congratulations fortune of the Ceun=y to have such an outstanding young men as one of its citlzsns. Vote: Unanimous M~. Sa~be~ presented the executed resolution to Mr. Schumashe~, accompanied Dy members of ~is family, and oongratula~e~ him on his outstanding achievement. 94-~05 2/~/94 CELEBRATION Mr. Stith recognized members of the "Black History Month" Committee for their ~ffer~e ~ewarde "Black History Month". Be then introduced Dr. Eddie Moore, President of Virginia State University; Mr. Arthur Nallory, representing Philip Morris; Mr. Ray Gross, rsprssentinq B~ll Atlantic; Mr. Jame~ representing creater Bank; M~. John Rothnie, representing Virginia Power; Reverend Lawrence Pollard and Mr. Robert Harvey, representing the National. Aascciatisn for the Advanc~mQnt of Color~ People fNAACP); and Mr. Robert Long, representing the Southern Christian Leadership Confe~ence (SCLC), who were pra~ent tu receive the resolutions. on motion of ~ha ~aard~ ~he following resolution was adopted: W~R~%$, February is recognized as "Blank ~istery ~on=~" and ie a ti~e to formally acknowledge the many contributions of Afrioan~Americans tu the world and Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County values the growing diversity o~ ~he population Of the County 8nd the diverse composition of WE~R~A~, Chusterfisld county has been ~e lea~er in sho~s support for the event through their generous W}{ER~AS, Chesterfield County with gsnerou~ supper= from local businesses end community organizations such es the National Association for the Advancement o~ Colored People (N~3%CP); the southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC}; Philip Morris, TeA; Virginia Power; Bel~ Atlantic; Creater Bank; Central Fidelity Bank; and Virginia State University h~s chosen to celebrate the past three yea~s by providing quality groups; preminen= speakers; and lQ~al drama and einginq groups; W~EREAS, Chesterfield County will hold its Fourth Annual "Blac~ ~istory ~onLh" celebration in 1994 to co~emorat~ the vast accomplishments of African-Americmn~; and ~EAS, the intent of this celebration is to ga=her citizens of %he county in appreciation of the worthwhile ef~ort~ of African-~rieans, with special emphasis on o~lebra~ing %he aohievemen~s of those so significant to this ~rmat country. NOW, TH~REFOR~ BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfiuld County Beard of Suparvi~ors hereby expr%~a~ it~ appreciation to the National Association for the Advancement Colored People (N~CP]; the Southern Christian L~ad~rship Conference (SCLC); Philip Morris, USA; Virginia Power; Sell Atlantic; C~eeta~ Bank; Central Fidelity B~nk; and State University for i~$ ~ontinuous communizy support and good corporate citizenship. Mr. Colbert stated he thorouqhly enjoys4 th~ kick-off celebration for "Black History Month" held at Virginia State University, presented the ~xecuted resolution= to each of the con~ributlons toward ~he "Blaok History Month" celebration. 94-107 2/9/94 HEARINGS OF CITI~ENR ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERB OR CLAIMS RE~DIN~ ~LLO~TION OF FUNDS IN TH~ 1994-95 ~B~OOL BUDGET FOR DAILY UNSNCUMBERBB PLANNING TIHE FOR ELEMENT~Y TEACHERS O ~Z. 0IND¥ HUCHE$ Ms. Hughes sta~sd she is an art teacher at J, B. Watkin~ Elementary School and ~he feels providing the necem~ary funds makes a positive difference in education. ~he e~res~ed concerns r~lativ~ to the allocation of fund~ in the proposed FYg4-95 School budget for per pupil expenditure and estimated per pupil cost. ~h~ requested the Board to tully fund the proposed FY94-95 school budget and submitted into the record a copy of her co--ants. BAANNIN~ TIME FOR RSEHEBTARY TEACHERS M~. Sheep, Vice President of the C~esterfield Education Association, expresseo concerns role=ire to the allocation cf funds in the proposed FY~4~95 SChOOl Budget for teacher salaries and daily unencumbered planning time for elementary school teachers. Sh~ requested the ~oa~d to allocate funds i~ the School budget specifically for daily unencumbered el~m~nt&~y plennin~ time and to continue to support the five- year ~alary plan in~tia=e~ last year. sh~ submitted into the record a copy of her comments. l~.C,1. ~, JANET C. K~LLY Ms. Kelly stated she ia PTA President and a member of School Council at R~amE Road Elementary School; that she feels elementary education is of vital importance and, specifically, for elemeDt~ry ~eaohe~ planning time, the j~n~or k~nderqarten proqram~ and the concept of teaming at the middle school level. she requeste~ the ~oard to ~upport th~ capital improvement bo~owing t~at would allow Reams Road Elementary school receive a gymnasium and possibly a cafeteria and to approve setting s referendum date sooner than November~ 1996. she submitted into the record a o~py of her M~. Prid~en stated she is a teacher at Reams Road Elementary school and a member of the chesterfield ~duuation Association and expressed concerns relative to adequate funding for the ~chool budqet and, specifically, as it relates to daily unencumbered planning time at t~e elementary so,ecl level and teacher salaries, she requested the Board to provide adequate in=o the record a copy of her comments. Ms. Wilmouth sta~ed she is an elementary school teacher and expressed concerns relative to funding for the School budget and, ~pecifically. a~ it relates to daily unencumbered planning time at th~ elementary school level. She requested the Board to fund the proposed FY94-95 School budget and submitted into the record a sopy of her comments. 16. PUBLIC HE,RINSE on motion of ~r. Dauiel, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board a~e~ded the agenda and movmd Item 16.F., A Public Hearing to Consider the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. an Amendment to tho 91an for Chesterfield to be heard as the first public 16.~. TO CONSIDER THE ~ARKS A/~D K~CRE~TION KASTE~ PLAN, AN the therapeutic horse program, introduced one o5 the participants of the progr~m~ Keith. Keith demonstrated to the assisted Keith with his disability. Miss Ni¢ole Cos~u stated she hopes the County will build a a permanent riding ring. participated in the therapeutic riding program at O. B. Gates impaired; and ~ha~ he rides horses for therapy and the family hopes to find a way for him to b~ abl~ to do this type of participates in the horsebacR riding program as physical therapy; that horseback riding stimulates hie muscles an~ %hat t~ere are not many activities availabl~ for handicnpped children; and that she supports the therapeutic horseback riding program. Men=al Heal=h/~ental Retardation/Substance Abuse Services and and that the C~ester£ield ~asketball League is prepared to financially assist the County in equipping some of the concerns relative to safety condition~ and; ~pecifioally, a~ i~ changing from composition floors to wooden floors has decrease~ the incidence of injury and iu more beneficial to the users of the facility. 219194 Mr~ C- C. Lewis! representing the Ettrisk YoUth Amsoaiatlon, the Ettrick Business Council, Ettrick on the Move, and CAPAAMD, stated they ~upport the proposed Parks and Recreation Master Plan and, spe¢ificKlly, as it relates swimming pools and community centers. Mr. william Ritshie, representing CAPAJ~D, stated they support coD~truction of a co~unity center at the Ettrlck Recreatis~ Park which they would like ts be used as a me,ting place for community organizatio~s. horseback riding program; that he feels the children significantly b~nefit from the therapeutic horseback riding program; and requeste~ the Board to build a riding ring. He recognized ~everal other volunteers fur the ~r0gram who were present at ~he meeting, Ms. Diane Ogelaby stated she is a special edusa=i0n ~eachsr and initiated the therapeutic horseback riding program at O. Gates Elementary School. She briefly reviewed the program and presented a video pr~g~ntation showing participation of children in the prsqram. She submitted into the record a copy A~tsr brief discussion, Mr. McHale made a motion, sQcond~d by Mr. Colbert, for the Board to instrUCt the County to allssa%s ~2~,O~0 from ~urplus to be used for the therapeutic horseback r~ding program. Ms. Dorcus Ysagsr stated she represents the School Board on ParKs and Recreation Advisory Commission and she supports the consern$ relative to gymnasiums beln~ carpeted versus wooden floors as it relates to the activities being offered and stated she ~sel~ woo~en floors ar~ easier to maintain and are safer; that ~he ¢o~%y ~eea nut have enough County/~chool gymnasiums to support youth and adult recreation programe~ and requested approve new construction standards to maximize school facility ~s. ~ggy Byrd stated nhe i~ a r~idQnt of th~ County and briefly reviewed the focus of the F0Ur-H Horse Club. SUe expressed appreciation ts t~e Board for initiation of the therapeutic ho~sebac~ riding prs~ra~. Mis~ Michel]e Snyder ~tated she is President of tho Chesterfield Cruisers Fsur-H asrs~ club; that riding horses is an on~cing pro~sat~ that they would like to have a place in the County to ~erform their hore~ shows; ~nd e~pre~se~ aD~reclaticn to the Board for their support_ Ms. Susan Robinson, President of ?ri-City Morse Association, displayed to the Board a horse show banner and expressed appreciation to the Board for initiation of t~e therapeutis horseback riding program. ~r- Dane Lewis s~a~ed he is a past member of t~e Perks and Reoreatisn Advisory Commission und represents the Chesterfield Youth Girls Softball Association; ~hat ~hey support the proposed Parks and Recreation Master ~lan which will upgrade fields in ~he County; that volunteers will be needed to assist in implementation cf the Plan~ and expressed appreciation to the Board for their support. 94 11o Ms, Judy Kritchet expressed appreciation to the Board fo~ providing the necessary fuhding for the therapeutic horseback riding program and stated she has participated in the program and feels the program is extremely beneficial to children with disabilities. Miss Kristan Kelley read into the record a poem written by her younger brother, Shown Kelley, about a horse, she submitted a Ms. Rite Kelley stated she is Kristine~s mother and her son, Shawl, has participated in the theFapeutlc horseback program and ~×press~d appreciation to the B~ard for their support of the program. MS. Alma Kemper stated she would li~e to see community cantors established in several parts of the County and, specifically, in the Matoaca area and requested the Board to consider restoring the Union Grove ~lementary school building for use as a ccnnunity center~ There was brief discussion relative to tho County renovating removal. Mr. Eddie Parker, representing th~ Poceshock Valley Youth Soccer League and Hopkins Athletic Association, stated he fully supports tho proposed Rarks and Recreation Master Plan a~ he feels youth need more recreational facilitlas and expressed concerns relative to adequate facility ne~d~ fo~ spor~, private/public partnerships for sperts associations and developers and for greater cooperation with the School System on the use of sport facilities through the use of financial ~ncsntives. Mr, Jim Daniels, representing the Chesterfield ~usiness council, the Jefferson Davis Assecieticn~ and the Central Parks and Recreation staff for their efforts in administering ~ervic~ a~ a much lower p~r ca~ita cost than most uther localities. He expressed concerns relative to th~ proposed Parks and Recreation Meste~ Plan and requested the Board to consider deferring consideration of the Plan to allow an £ac~ora associated wi~h the proposed Plan and stated he feels Zr. Paul Bacey, representing the Salem Church Youth Program, ~tated they would like more softball fields constructed in the Mas=er Plan; and requested tke Board ~e sunsider budgeting allow for additional programs. Thore b~ing no on~ else to adOresm thi~ issue, the public hearing was closed. pools and gol~ courses as proposed in the Plan as ha feels costs and the definition of community cmnters and for County 94-111 2/9/94 ~taff to coordinate with School staff to ensure the facilltie~ outlined in the Plan will accommodate ~oth County and School needs. He further ~tated he feels the Plan should clearly state that swimming pools and golf courses are private endeavors. M~. Warren expressed appreciation to citizen~ who provided input into this public hearing protons and s~ated he feels the Plan needs to address various issues and, therefore, consideration of the Plan should be deferred to allow an opportunity for further review. Mr, Warren then made a motion for the Board to d~fer consideration of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, amendment to the Plan for Chesterfield, the County's Comprehensive pleD, until April 12, 1994. Mr- McNale seconded the motion- Fir. NcNale stated he feels ~he proposed Plan should clearly define the planning factors during the ~eli~eration process and he would like staff to review co~t fathers a~sociated with the Plan and utilization of public/private partnerships. further stated he supports d~f~rring consideration Of t~e Plan to allow for further review of %he issues expressed during the public hearing prosess~ Mr. Daniel mtat~d he is als0 concerned about the proposed swimming pool~ and ~olf courses being a part of the Plan and he fssls the private sector should meet %hose types of services. He further stated the Board need~ to recognize the importance oS balancing all needs and services with a limited amount of rmmourcem and for it to be clearly indicated that adoption of tho proposed Plan is not a commitment to raise taxes in order to fund it. He indicated ~e feels the public hearing o~ t~is issue nas demonstrated the diverse population in the County which ham a broad spectrum of recreatis~&l needs ~eing mat. Mr. Colbert called for the vo~s, sn th~ motion made by Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. McNale~ for the Board to defer consideration of the Parks and Recreatlcn Ma~ter Plan, an amendment tO the plan for Chesterfield, the County's Co__m. prehensive Plan~ until April 12, 1994. Vote: Unanimous It was generally agreed to r~sss for fiv~ minutes. I~.A. TO OO~SIDER READOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO A~EN~ THR SUBSCRIBER RATES F~r. Micas stated this date end time has been advertised for a public hearing ~o ~onsider readoption of an ordinance rela~ing further stated under ~he new cable television law, %he County of ~qulpmen~ and ~a~ic servic~ is defined under the regula~ion~ meeting, the Board ~dopted tko ordinance on an emergency ~asis in order to meet deadlines established by the Federal 94-1tz ~/9/94 Ce~unieatlons Co~i~sion and staff recomNends readeptien of the ordinRnce. Mr. George Beadles expressed concerns relative to the eo~t of cable service and indicated he supports readoption of the propomed ordinance. There being ne one else te address this ordinance, the public gearing was closed. On motion of Mr- Warren, seconded by Mr- Barber, the Board adopted the following AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OP CKE~TERFIELD, 197g, Ag A~NDED, BY AND REEHACTIN~ SECTION 7-9 RELATIN~ TO T~E REGULATIO~ OF ~BLE TELEVISION S~SCRIBER ~ES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: {%) That Section 7-9 of the Code of the County of c~e~erfield, ~TS~ as amen~e~ im amende~ an~ read as fo21ows: Sec. 7-9. Submcriber fa~ and ratam. The board of supervisors shall have the authority %o regulate ratem~ equipment and installation of cable services in accordance with stat~ and f~d~ral law~ rul~ or regul~tion~- neqotiated b~tween the grantee and the owners, or acting on their behalf, for regular subscriber, servic~ provided to t~n (lO) ur more dwelling units within an apartment building, condominium, garden apartment or townhou~e complex under common ownership, ur to tan (10] or more room units immediately upon adoption. V~te: Unanimous Mr. stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a public hearing to consider the prohibition of through truck or truck and ~railer or ssmi-~ailer combination exoa~b ~ioku~ mr panel trucks fre~ using Mount Pi~gah Drive and oak Lan~ from Midlethian Turnpike to salisbury Drive. Mr. George Beadles expressed concerns relative to the number of roads currently restricted in the County to through truck traffic. h~arfng wam closed. On notion of Mr. Warren, so.ended by Mr. McHale, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board sf Supervizors ~eceive~ a requemt from citizens to prohibit any through t~ue~ or truck and trailer or semi-trailer combination excep~ pickup ur panel truc~s from using Mount Pisgah Drive (Route 1006} and O~k Lane (Route 1006) from ~idlmthisn Turnpike {Route 6Q) to Salisbury Drive (Route XOU3}; and WHEREAS, the recommended alternate route is Midlothian Turnpike and Salisbury Drive; and WH~R~A~, the Board has c~nducted a p~blio heari~ on the prohibition. NOW, THEREFORE BE ~T R~$OLV~D, tha~ the chesterfield County Board of Supervisor~ reque~t~ the Virginia Department of Transportation to prohibit through truuk traffic on Mount Pisgah Drive and Oak Lane from Midlothian Turnpike to Salisbury 16.O. TO CONSIDER THE ~0N~EYA~C~ OF ALL TE~T CERTAIN TP~CT OR LOCATED IN DALE COUNT~_.~_I~JNIA. ~T THE CHESTERFIELD AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PA~K ~-ND AUTHORIZATION ~OK GOUTY ~D~TNTSTP~kTOR TO ENTER I~TO AN OPTION AGREEMENT ~URCH~SB THE PROPERTY pUbliC hearinq to con~ider t~e conveyance of a parcel of land in the Airport Industrial Park and authu~izatio~ for Ce~ty A~ministrator to enter in~c ~n option agreement with c ~ Richmond Business $~rvicss ~1, L.P. to purchase the prcpurty. He briefly reviewed the proposal. No one came fo~ard to speak in favor of er against this issue. authorized the conveyance of all that certain tract or parcel of land contiouimg 3.8 plus or minus acres, located in Dale Magisterial District of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at the Chesterfield Airport Industrial Park, which parcel fron~s approximately DO feet on the cul-de-sac of White Dark Terrace; is bordered on the northeao~ by property owned by the Chesterfield County Industrial Oevelopment Authority; on the southeast by Route 288; and on the northwest by property owned by Dennis ~. Owens and W. G. & H. J. Lindsey (which includes parcel 79-&(3)43 and thc portion of 79-6(3)11) end authoriscd the County ~d~i~istrator to enter i~to an option agreement, at the price of $45,000 per acre, with C K Richmond Business Services fl L.P. to purchase =he proper~y. F¥95 E/F~J%~CEMENT ~r. Stith ~tated this date an~ time h~ been ~dverti~e~ for a public hesr~ng to coneider the Virginia ~epart~ent of Tran~port~tion'e FYP5 Enhancement Projects. ~e briefly re~iewed the propoeed Projects and requested the Board to includ~ the Virginia Civil War Overland and Richmond Metropolita~ Battlefield P~eject in the Enhancement ProJuctu. 94-114 ~/9/94 Mr. George Beadles expressed concerns relative to the Siko Lane - Smoketree Drive Project as it relates to its priority ranking T~ail Network and [he Palling Creek Pedestrian Trail Network Proj~otz should he ranked higher than tMe Bike Lane - Smoke~ree Drive Project as these projects would further enhance tourism efforts in the County. There was brief discussion relative to the priority listing and the process in which Brats fund~ are spent and, specifically, as it relates to the Bike Lane - Smoketree P~ojeot. Ms. Terry Sheet~, representing th~ Wnndlake Community Association, requested the Board to add to the priority list proposal from the Association for 94 e~rb o~a~ge~ at ~rail/stre~t intersec~ionz, 5 bike trail additions, and additional Stop-A-Whiles. She reviewed the proposal and, specifically, the safety concerns associste~ with their request a~d s%~ted the proposal would be funded ~0 percent by th~ Virginia Department of Transportation and 20 percent hy the Woodlake Community Association. She submitted into the record ~. Btith described the Virginia C~vil War Overland Richmond Metropolltan Battlefield Project requested by tko ~etropotitan Richmond convention and visitor's Bureau. Discussion~ comments, and questions ensued relative to these proDosal~ net needing County funds, but requiring Board approval to include the proposals on the recommended FY95 Bnhancement Project List; inclusion of ~he proposals reordering ~hm priority ranking of the other projects on the list; and the projects bsing prioritized as it ~zlates to the use of County ~unds and the process in ~hich the State considers the projects. There being ne one elsa to ad~ress this issue, the public hearing was closed. There was brief discussion relative to transportation p~o~eets ~eing financed with 80 percent virginia Department of Transportation's funds and a minimum 20 percent local match an~, spscifically, how it rela~es to tko proposal prossn~ed by the Woodlake Community Association. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board List and directed staff to forward the List to the Richmond Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for approval and and/or design agreements with the virginia Department of adop%e~ %he following resolution: WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) construction allocation procedurms, it is necessary of proposed enhancement projzcts. Henricus in Chesterfield county. 94-115 2/9/94 AND, BE IT FURTHER R~SOLV£D, that the Board hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total estimated cost of planning, desiqn, right sf way, and construction for the Henricus Access Road Improvement Project, and that~ if the Board subsequently elects to cancel this Project, the County of Chegterfield hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. adopted the following resolution; WH~R=AB, in accordance with Ccmmonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) construction allooation procedures, it is necessary tha~ the local governing body request, by resolution, approval NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of supervisors o~ Chesterfield County requests th~ CTB to establish a project to provide pha~e one of the landsoaping Road. AND, BE IT FURTHER R~SOSV~D, that tho Board hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the ~cbal estimated cost of $~0,000 for planning, design, right of way, and construction of phase one of the Route 10 Landscaping Project from ~he Courthouse Complex cancel th~e Project, the County of Chesterfield hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Oepartment of Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by the Departmsut tho date the Department is no~ified of such cancellation. Vote: Unanimous on motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board adopted the following resolution: Bsard (CTB) construction allocation procedures, it is that the local governing body requemt, by resolution, approval u~ propose~ enhancement projects. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT R~MOLV~D, ~hat the Board of ~upervisors of Chmsterfield County requests th~ CTB to establish a ~roject to provide bike lanes on Smoketree Drive. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total estimated cost of $70,0Q0 for planning, design, right of way, and oonstruction of the Smekstree Bike Lane Project~ and that~ if th~ Board subsequently elects ~o cancel this Project, the County of Chesterfield hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for t~e total amount of t~e costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notifi=d of such sancella~isn, Vots: Unanimous A~ter brief ~iscussiun, on mo~ion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board adopted thm following resolution: Beard (CT~) csnstruotion allocatlen pro=aduree, it im necemsary that the local governing body request, by resolution, approval of proposed enhancement projects. NOW, THER~FORE SE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisor~ of Chesterfield C~unty requests the CTB to establish a project te provide Wcsdlake bike trail addi~iens. ~D, gE IT FURTHER RE~OLVED, that the Board hereby agree~ that 20 percent of the total estimated cost of $94,750 for planning, design, right-of-way, amd con,traction of trail addition~ will be paid by the Woodlake Community Association, and that, if the Board subsequently elects to sanccl this pro,est, th~ County of Chesterfield hereby agrees the A~sociation will reimburse the Virginia Department cf T~ansportation for the total amount of thc costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. vote; Unanimous Mr. Hammer ~ate~ s~aff ha~ me~ wi~ representatives from the Metrcpolita~ Richmond Convention ~nd Visitor's Bureau in association with ~he counties e~ Spotsytvania, Caroline, ~in~ Charles city, an~ Ches~er£iel~, and Fredericksburg and Hopewell to propose to document, interpret, and previ~a a g~id~d =ourism route of General U. s. Grant's Bermuda ~undred Campaign=. Ke further s~ete~ in the upcoming Budget there will be an appropriation request for the regional signage for tourism sites and staff can use the same dollars allocated in the regional signage program as a match for this ISTEA grant. H~ noted th~ o~rall project -- The Virginia civil ~ar Overland and Richmond Eetrepolitan Battlefield Project -- will be split into two phases, each of which is ~rojec%ed to cost ~400,000, with the County's share not exceeding $10,000 for each- Mr. Ramsay clarified the nature of the Regional Signaqe proposed enhancemcn~ establish a project to document and interpret a multi- jurisdictional Virginia Civil War Overland and Richmond Metropolitan Battlefield Project as proposed by the AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board hereby agrees to pay $10,000 as its ~hare of the multi-jurisdictional project. (It is noted a copy o£ the ~Y95 =nhencement Projeuts list is filed with the papers of this Board.) 1~.~. TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A T~AESITION PLA~ FOR REOUIRED UI~DER TH~ A~ERICAN8 WI~H DISABILITIES A~T Mr. colbert recognized Mr. James Bengledorf who was'present at the meeting ~c is~erpre~ the public hearing in sign language. 2/9/94 ~. Mary Martin Tucker, ADA Cuordinator, stated this date and time has been advertised for a public hearing to consider adoption of a transition plan for required structural alterations to County-owned buildings under the Americans with Disabilities Act. She briefly reviewed components of the Act transition plan. Ms. Robin Moerber stated ~he re~ide~ iD the County and is a member of the Disabilities Services Board; :hat she feels the plan is step forward in assisting disabled citi~ens~ and expressed appreciation to all for their efforts in this endeavor. Mr. Charle~ Bowman ~tated he resides in the County and is th~ Secretary/Treasurer of the Disabilities Services Board; :hat he feels the plan will a~i~t disabled individuals in becoming productive no.bars of society~ that he feels the County should meet not only ~he letter of th~ law, hut the spirit of the law as wellf and requemted the Board to adopt the Plan. Ms. Ellen Wood stated ~ke i~ a member of the State D~sab~l~tles Services Council; that she feels the proposal is a good Plan, but other areas will eventually need to b~ considered; a~d requested the Boar~ to a~op% the ~rcpesed Plan. Ms. Liu-Jen Chu ~tated she resides in ~he County; that her dauqhter is mentally retarded; that she is a member of Chesterfield citizens for People with Mental Retardation; tha~ h~r daughter participnte~ in the Parks and R~craabion progrems for the handlcapp~d; that people with disabilities have ~eeds important as physical improvements to facilities; and requested the Beard to adopt the proposed Plan. She submitted into th~ record a copy of her comments. btu. Michael Noretty stated he i~ a ~ember of Chesterfield citizens for People with M~ntal RetardatiQn~ that bis son is mentally handicapped; that the propo~d Plan primarily addresses County-owned buildings; that handicapped people have more need~ other th~n the requirement~ for ~t~otural chang~; and tha~ the Parks and Recreation programs offered for unified sports assists handicapped persons in participating in various Plan and address the progra~unahlc changes in the parks and recreation ~egment of the Plan a~ cited on Page 20 of the Plan. There being no cnn else to address this issue, the public he.ring was closed. .~r. Warren ~t&ted he fe~ls this progra~ needs to be implemented ~r. warren then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Barber, for the Board to adopt ~ transition plan for required structural alterations to County-owned buildings un,er the Americans with Disabilities Act. Mr. Barber stated hi~ undergraduate work was in special education and he understands the concerns expressed. ~e further ~tated he feels adoption of this plan is a step forward 219194 Warren, ~econ0ed by ~r. Ba~ar, for the Board to adopt a owned b~ilding~ under the Americans with Disabilities Act~ (It 16. ~D~OUR~P On ~otion of ~Lr. Colbert, ~econded by Mr. ~cHale~ ~he Board adjourned at 10:o0 p,m, until F~bruary ~3, 1~94 at 3:00 D.m. Vote: UnRnimous Whale~ 1'~, C01bezt Chairman