09-14-94 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
S~te~e~ 14, L994
8upervisor~ in Attendance:
~r. J. L. Mc~ale, III~ Vice Chr~.
Mr. Edward B. Barber
Mr. Harry G. Dan%el
Mr. Arthur S. Warren
Mr. Lane B. Ram~ey
County Adminigtrator
Staff ih
M~. Barbera Bennett, Dir.,
Office on Youth
~r. Craig Bryant~ Dir.,
M~. ~arilyn Cole, Exec.
Asst. tc County A~min.
Mrs. Doris R. De~art~ '
A$S~. GO. Admin.,
Legis. Svcs. and
Intergovern. Affairs
Mr. William D. Dupler,
Building official
Chief ~obert L. Eunes, Jr.,
Fire DeDar~ment
Mr. Bradford S. He,er,
DeDu~y Co. Admln.,
~r. Russell Harris,
County Ombudsman
Mr. Lou Lassiter, Dir.,
Internal Audit
~r. John R. Lillard~ Dir.,
Airport
~r. ~obert L. Masden,
Deputy Co~ Admin.,
Human· Services
Nr. Steven L. Micas,
County Attorney
Mr. ~D~th ~rrotte,
Dir.~ News & Infor~atlon
servloes
Col. J. R. Pittman~ Jr.,
Clerk to the Board
Mr. Thomas H. spence,
Actin~ Dir., General
Services
Mr. Jamam J. L. Stegmaier,
Dir., Budqet & Management
Mr. M. D. sti~h, Jr.,
Deputy Co. Admin.~
cormmunity
Dr. Robert
Dir., Libraries
Sheriff Clarence Williams,
Sheri~i'~
~r. Frederick ~illis, Jr.,
Dir., Human Resource ~g~.
Mr. McHale culled the re~tarly ~cheduled meetlnq to order at
3:10 p.m.
9/14/94
1. APPKo~AL OT MI~UTS~
1,A, AUGUST 22, 1994
On motion Of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, tbs ~oard
approved the minutes of August 22, 1994, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
approved tb~ minut~ of August ~4, ~9~4, a~ submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
2. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COHMENT8
~r. Ramsay introduced Mr. Willis who stated the County has
recently been notified that %he ~uman Ro~ouroe Management
Department has been selected to receive an Achievement Award
from the virginia chapter of the International ~ersonnel
Managers Association (IPNA) for its entry entitled, "Jobsit~
Orientation Buddy System." He further stated the Program is
d~sign~d to reCo~niu~ and encourage innovation and high
standards in human resource management and the entry was
selected bused cn its innovation~ results~ and adaptability to
other juri~ictiun~ and was designed by the Cultural Diversity
Committee. ~e briefly reviewed the Buddy System which ensures
:ha~ sash new employee receives a personal welcome and t~at
there i~ a comfortable work envlrornment for everyone. He
recognized Captain David ~utton of the ~hsriff'e office; Mr.
Charle~ Tucker of the Juvenile Detention Memo; and ~tr~. Mary
Martin Tucker and Mr. Charles Lee, both of the ~uman Resource
Management D~partm~nt, for their ~ffort~ and participation in
e~tabl~shlng the Program.
Mr. Ramsay congratulated staff on receiving the Award and for
their initiative and innovation in establishing tbs Buddy
system Program.
Mr. Ramsoy then introduced chief Pittman who ~ated tbs county
has recently been notifie~ that ~h~ Police Department has been
~el~cted to receive an A~h£evem~nt Award from The National
Association of Uniform Manufacturers and Distributors far the
best-dressed police force. He further stmted out of 5~ law
enSorcsment agencies participating in the selection, only mine
were selected to receive Achievement Awards. ~e introduced
Officer Cyn~hla Lyons-Chambers, Off,car Jeffrey Verland~r, and
Lieutenant Thierry Dupuis of the Polic~ Department, who were
present to diaplay the County's summer, wln=er, and management
police uniforms. ~e then updated the Board on e~tabllshment of
the serious Habitual Offender Comprshensivo Action Program
(SHOCAP) fn which the Board had directed ~taff to develop. ~e
stated SH0CAP has been implemented in the county and is an
inter-agency approach designed to identify and appregriately
respond to serious and habituat cffender~ and e~pha~i~e~
system-wide coordination and information sharing among
participating agencies through th~ police coordinator. H%
briefly revie~sd the Program and its objectives. When asked,
he stated SKOCAP allow~ t~e County to sha~e information with
other agencies in an effort to obtain information on juveniles
for offenses that may occur in other jurisdictions.
............... iL L~.~L .......... L t L .................
3. BOARD OOF~{ITTEE REPORTS
Mr. Warren ststed hs held a constituents meeting on September
12, 1994 with the topic of discussion being education and noted
MS. Dianne Pettift, Clover ~ill soheel Board reprasentatlve~
and Delegate John ~a~kins were guest speakers snd that his next
constituents meeting will be held October 3~ 1994 wit2% the
topis of discussion being the olympic Festival and noted Mr.
Robert Ukreps will be the guest speaker. He noted he has held
approximately 32 constituents meeting to-date and that it has
been rewarding to serve residents Of Clover Hill District
Mr. Daniel stated he has attended several meetings with the new
Regional Economic Development Publie/Private Partnership in
which they are in tho process of developing goals and
strat~gi~ for the organization. He further stated the Capital
Region Airport Commission has sO2%eduled a meeting for septalnber
19, 1994 with ~r. Robert T. ~kunda, Secretary ~f state for
Economic Development, tn share short and lc~g term goals of the
Airport and ether issues of ~utual concern; that the Commission
has scheduled briefings with State senators and members of the
House of Delegates in October an~ a meeting with the Chamber
leadership, the Economic Development Partnership Board cf
Directers, and other key business leaders in the Richmond
metropolitan area~ fo discuss the potential of the Richmond
International Airport and funding resources; and that the
Conuni~sion is loo~ing for a state/local government partnernhip
to address the airport expansion and ~eels chesterfield will ba
a leader in that endeavor.
~r. Barber stated he attended an orientation meeting fo~ new
County teachers and the new James River High school
orientation. E~ further ~tat~d he held his "First Monday"
constituents meeting on Sea=ember 12, 1994 with the topic of
discussion being the Midlothian area YMCA; that his next
constituents meeting will be held October 3, t994 with the
tople of dinaus~ion being th~ Drug and Alcohol Abuse Task
Force; that he attended a meeting with the Richmond Area
Metropolitan Transports%ion Plannihg 0rga~X~ation (~o) in
which they met with federal highway administration agencies;
that he attended Riolu~ond Alarm System's Association seminar on
how industries cnn reduce false alarms; that he will be
attending a meeting with the Walton Park Civic Association te
discuss traffic in that area; that he will he attending the
the Boulders Concert and H~nricus Day, both on September 18,
1994, and th= grand opening of Sears Homelife Furniture cn
september 17, 1994. He noted he has a meeting scheduled to
discuss shipping cargo for the Richmond International Airport
and that he has been invited by the White House to attend the
official welcoming of ~oris W~ltsin on September ~7, 19~4.
~r. ~cHale stated his constituents meeting was held on
september 1~, 1994 with the topic of discussion bein~ ctu"~ent
Connty issues and that the County Administrator was tl~e guest
speaker; that he and Mr. Barber attended the Volunteer
Firefighter Crad~ation on ~pt~h~r 1~, ~9~ and noted the
contributions of volunteer fireflghters ts the County,
s~ecifioally, saving the County approximately $2 milliena year
with their volt,tear sez-~ice; and that he attended a Uir~inla
Senate Local Government Committee meeting on August ~5, 199~-
4. RBQUEST~ TO FOSTPONE ACTION~ ~RGENOY ADDITIONS. OR
CHAN~ES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Nr. ~arr~n, ~uconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
moved Item 8.A., Consideration of Adoption of Resolution
Supporting thm Abolition of ~arol~ to Follow Item 5.,
Resolutions and Special Reco~nitioD~, and as additional
information, submitted the resolution regarding crime adopted
at the Regional Su~mit; added Item S.S.i.d., Adoption of
Resolutlon Recognizing Kanohes~er High school for Instituting
e High School Crime Solvers Program to follow Item
Adoption of Resolution Recognizing September 20, 1994 as
"CheSterfield County Total Qnality Improvement (TQT)
Celebration Day;" added Item ll.C., an E~mcutive Session
Pursuant to ~ect~on ~.1-$44(A) (7), Code of Vlrqlnla,
Amended, for Consult=tion W~th Legal Counsel to
Specific L~al ~atters Relating to Sexual ~arassment Claims to
follow I%~m ll.B., an Executive Session Pursuant to Section
2.1-~A.A.7., Code of virqini~, for Consultation with Legal
Counsel Regarding Actual Litigation Relating to Enforcement of
th~ UniforI~ Statewide Building Code; and deferred Item 15.C.,
Resolution Recognizing September 17-23, 1994 as "Constitution
Week" until September ~, 1994 and, ~dopted the agenda, as
a~ended.
~- R~OLUTIONS ~ND SPECIAL RECOGNITIOns
There wer~ no Remolutions and Special Recognitions so~edulud at
~.A. ~ON$IDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTIN~
of a r~olution supporting the abolition uf parole. He
introduced Delegate Cox.
Delegat~ Cox reviewed crime statistics that indicate every
twenty-three minutes a Virginian is ra~ed, murdered, robbed, or
that a boy born in 1974 stands a greater chance of being a
victim in crime than a soldier in World War II dying in co,bat;
percent in the suburbs. He requeste~ the Board tO adopt a
Allents plan include~ eliminating mandatory and discretionary
mu~imu/~ good ti~e credit~ requiring participation in a work,
rehabilitation, or drug program; and introducing t~uth-in-
Governor Allen's ideas for addressing the need to build
additional prisons. ~e stat~d he has visited hemes and
businesses through~ut Chesterfield and Colonial Heights and
citiz~n~ have voiced that addressing crime should bm the top
priority and the plan, as proposed by Governor Alle~, will
accomplish putting away violent ef£~nd~rs.
Sheriff Williams stated he became the County's Sheriff in 1990
~nd at that time, the County's j~ii was over populate~. ~e
further state~ staff began working on a Jell annex and the
oapaclty to 2~0. He noted in August of thle year, the County'~
the Sheriff's Departnen~ to assist in the overcrowding of the
jail including the home incarceration monitoring ~y~tem
camp program. M~ f~rther stated he supports the plan as
94-647 9/14/94
proposed by Governor Allen and he feels it is time for
Virginians to come together in putting away violent
their service to the community. Ee stated County ~itizens have
voiced they want the current parole system changed; that the
Mayor and city Manager in the City of Richmond have endorsed
Governor Allen's plan; that colonial H~ights has just recently
endorsed the resolution; that the Board now has the opportunity
to represent the interest of the citizens; and urged the Board
to adopt the resolution supporting Governor Allen's proposal to
abolish parole.
Mr. Daniel stated citizen meetings have been held iu his
District for the past ~everal month~ on the i~mue of crime and
the number one fear of the citizens is public safety.
further stated he feels citizens want an end to violent crime
and adoption of the proposed resolution is the appropriate step
to take at this time.
Mr. Warren expressed appreciation to Senator Martin, Delegate
Cox, and Sheriff Williams for their prese~tatio~ and stated
several ~onths ago, the Board agreed that a lot of ~ork needed
to be done in the area of ellm~natlng violent crime. He
Discussion, co=ants, and questions ensued relative to funding
s~uroes for the prison building program] the funding issues not
being finalized a~ this time; the opportuDity to use
Obligation (GO) Bends and Virginia PUblic Building Authority
(VPBA) Bonds for funding; citizens having the opportunity to
vot~ on some of the funding resources by way of referendum; the
anticipated cost of the prison building program; ways to save
money such as double bunking and removing non-violent offender~
Srum ~aximum/me~ium £acilities; achieving savings through outs;
and it being the responsibility of government to protect
oltlzsns from vlolant offenders and this being a ~op priority.
Mr. Barber stated he feels the issue of prevention ~heuld be a
consideration in reaching children before they become violent
offenders.
Sheriff William9 stated he feels thi~ p~sble~ needs to be
addressed and that everyone needs to come together to rid
community cf violent offenders. ~e further ~tated he feels if
action is not taken now, the problem will continue to e~¢alate-
Mr. Mc~ale stated he feels citizens are concerned about crime
and repeat offenders and this is an issue that n~eda to he
acted upon. ~e further stated he also feels the is=us of
prevention needs to be addressed and he supports the proposed
proposed resolution for the abolition of parole.
record by the Clerk.
On motion of Far. Daniel, seconded by I~r. Warren, the Foard
~eaffi~d the ~elutien adopted the R~ional So, it on
entitled, "Resolution Regarding Mandatory Sentencing
Requirement and Elimination of ~arolo;" and adopted the
£ellowlng resolution:
R=$OLUTION FOR T~E ADOLITIO~ O~ PAROL=
W~EREAS, violent crime is the single most serious issue
facing Virginia today~ and
WEEREAS many violent criminals serve only 17 percent of
their ~entences~ and
WHeReAS every 22 minutes a virginian is the victim of a
senseless act of violence; and
and
~EP~EAS d0 percent of all violent criminals hav~ prior
criminal records; and
decreases as the len~h of incarceration increases~ and
~EREAS a ~iolent criminal in prison cannot ha~ an
innocent victim.
NOW, TK~EFO~ BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County ~oa~d of Supervisor~ ur~e~ the Virginia ceneral
rec~endations of Governor Allen's C~ission to A~olish
Parole effective January 1~ 1995, establish truth-in-
¢~nt~n¢ing, and ~ubstantially incr~a~ th~ ti~ ~srv~ for
violent and repeat criminals.
Vote: Unanimous
(It i~ noted a copy of the regional ~esolution is filed wi~
On notion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Barber, tb~ Board
deferred a work session on the Quarterly Performance Report
7. DEFERRED iTEMS
There were ne Deferred items scheduled at this time.
NEW ~UsX~ES~
CONSIDERATION OF ~BTTiNG DATE FO~ A ~UBLIC HEA~ING
~r. Ramsay s~ated Mr. Daniel has requested the Boar~ consider
s~tting ~e date cf September 21, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. for
purpose of hearing oiti~n conm~nt for th~ appointment of
Katoaca District Supervisor.
wi~ citizen i~votveme~t i~ the proce~. ~e further ~tated
has initiated and supported more public involvement on issues
affecting citizen rights in ~he county ~ch as opening
Board of supervisors meeting and having it televised; fostering
evening meetings and ~oldinq zoning in the evening portion
public hearings are not necessauily required. He stated he
than in the election and selection process for a
representative. He further stated the Charter only
94-649 9/14/94
the Board has the first opportunity to make that appointment
and he £eels it is ~he duty of the ~oaMd to hold a public
hearing to consider the selection of the Matoaca District
Supervisor to receive citizen ~nDut on the merits of the
various potential candidates.
Mr- Panini then made a motion for the Board to set the date of
September 21, 1994 8t 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing tu
consider appointment of the Matoaca Magisterial District
Supervisor.
Mr. Warren seconded the motion and stated he concurs with the
co~ents expressed by Mr. Daniel. ~e further stated he feels
a public hearing would allow an opportunity for citizens to
provide input and fo: the Board, collectively as a group, to
get tc Rnow the prospective candidates and have them express
their views,
M~. KcHale oalle~ for the vote on the motion made by Mr.
Daniel, seconded by Mr. Warrenr for the Board to set the date
o~ September 21, 1SS4 a~ 7:00 ~.m. fc~ a public hearing to
supervisor.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel and Mr. Warren.
N~ys; Mr. McH~le and Er. Darber.
~r. Willim stated last year th~ County and Schools received
proposals from health care providers to provide health ~are
services to employees over a three-y~ar period and County and
Sshool staff resently completed the negotiation process for the
1995 Employee ~ealth Care Program. He further stated in order
to p~cvide employ~s with quality h~alth care options within
budgetary tarqete, etaff reoe~endm ~e Coun=y renew i~m
contracts with itu current health care providers: Southern
Health Servicea, C~NA, ~ruCaro, a~ Delta Dental. He ~hen
r~vlewed employe~ health care ~nrollment under ire current
changes in %he plan; and noted the Southern Health Select Plan
will now have the same network as the Premiere Plan.
~r. ~arber expressed ap~recla=~cn to Mr. Willie and staff for
thei~ efforts i~ stabiti=ing the changes and rates.
M~. Barber then mad~ a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for the
Board to authorize the County Administrator to renew health
care contracts for the County's 1995 ~mployee ~ealth Care
Program wit~ $0~tkern ~ealth Services, CIGNA, Prudential
(ProC=re), and Delta Dental.
suspen~e~ i~m rules at this time to allow simultaneous
~iuhmond Transit Company (GRTC) Board of Directors.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Kr. Daniel, ~eeended by Mr. Barber, the Board
simultaneously nominated/reappointed Mr. Daniel K. Smith, Mr.
David W. Mathews, and Mr. S. Joeeph Ward te carve on the
Greater Riehmcn~ Transit company (GRTC] Board of Directors,
whose terns are effective October 20, 1994 and will expire at
the annual GRTC stockholders' meeting in 0ot0ber, 1995, and
authorized the County Administrator or his designee to appear
st the october 19, 1994 GRTC annual meeting to vote for the
Directors appointed by the Board and Richmond City Council.
~.D.2. D~UG ~ ~L~OHOL ABUSE T~K FORCE
O~ ~otio~ of M~. McHate, see0nded by Mr. Warren, the Board
suspended its rules at this time tO allow ~iault~neou~
nomination/appointment of members to serve on the Dr~g and
Alcohol Abuse Ta~k Force.
Vote: Unanimous
Os motion of Kr. ~arber, s~¢onded by ~r. Warren, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. B~rry Curtis; Mr.
Jonathan Dean; ~[r. Charles W. Hundl~y; Mr. Fred Carfares; end
Mr. Thomas McGlynn to serve on the Drug und Alcohol kbuse Task
Force, a~ at-large members, whc$~ term~ are effective
i~ediately and will be at the pleasure of the Board.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel submitted into th~ record a letter of s~ppor~ for
appointm~nt of Mr. Charles W. ~undl~y to ~arve on the D~ug and
Alcohol Abus~ Ta~k Force.
APPOMATTOX BASIN INDUSTRIAL D~VELOPMENT ~ORPO~ATION
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Barb=r, the Board
suspended its rules at this time to allow simultaneous
no~ination/r~appo~ntmeDt of a m~nber ~e serv~ on the A~emattox
Basin Industrial Developnent Corporation.
Vote: Unanimou~
On motion of Mr. Warren, smconded by ~r. Barber, the Board
simultaneously nominate~/reeppointed The Honorable J. L.
Nc/~ale, IIT to serve as th~ County's business representative on
~he A~omattox ~asin Industrial Development Corporation, whose
term is effective October 1, 19~4 and will mxpire September 30,
1995.
Vote: Unanimeu~
On ~etion of Kr. Daniel, seconded by Mr, Warren, the ~oard
suspended it~ rules at this time to allow simultaneous
nomlnatlon/r~a~pointmen~ of member~ to ~erve on the Debris
Manifest Appeals Board-
Vote: Unanimous
94-651 9/14/94
On motion Of Mr. Daniel, seconded by MU. Warren, tke Board
simultaneously nominated/reappointed Mr. Fred Carfares, Mrm.
Dona S. Link, and Hr. Glen ~. Hill to serve on the Debris
Manifest Appeals Board, whose tel~ms are effective October 12,
1994 and will expire October 1~, 1996.
8.E. ~ONSID~R~TION OF ~OIdM~NITY DBVELO~M~NT BLOCK
STREETLIGHT INSTALLATION ~OST APPROVAL
On motion of ~r. ~oHale, seconded by ~r. Warren, the Board
approved the following Co,unity Development Block Grant
stree~light installation cost approvals in the Grindell creek
Park area adjacent to the Route ~/301 Corridor:
* Addington Avenue, midway between Caldwell Avenue and
Oriole
* Caldwell Avenue and Castlewood Avenue.
Caldwell Avenue, ~iddle of ~900 bl~ok.
* Ca,dwell Avenue, north end near city limits.
* Caldwell Avenue, vicinity of 50t4.
* Caetlowood Avenue, be%wean Caldwell an~ Oriole.
* Ca~tlewood Avenue, between Celdwell and Oriole.
* Ca~tlewoo~ Avenue, middle of block between Douglas and
Caldwell.
* Douglas Avenue, ~eoond ~ule in from Falling Creek Avenue.
* Falllnq Creek Avenue, between Jefferson Davis Highway and
* Falling Creek Avenue, midway ~etween Huband Avenue and
Oriole Avenue.
apartments.
* ~uband Avenue, midway between Fallinq Creek Avenue and
Pate Avenue.
* McCartyAvenue~ n~dway between ~ddlngton Avenue and Or~ole
* Oriole Avenue, midway between Addingtsn Avenue and ~cCerty
* Oriole Avenue, midway b~twa~n C~s%lewoo~ Av~n~e and
* Oriole Avenue, secend pole in from Falling Creek Avenue.
* ~ayo Avenue, secon~ pole in from Falling Creek Avenue.
(It in noted there is no ~o~ to in~all the
On motion of ~r. ~¢Hale, seconded by Mr. Warren, tAe Boar~
approved the following streetlight installation cost approvals
in ~ermuda ~gisterial District:
* Intersection of Hackberry Lane and Starpine Road
(Revised Cus~ Approval)
A~d~tional coat to install light: $236.97
94-652 9/14/94
8.G. CONSENT IT~B
8,a,1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION8
On mo=ion of Hr. Barber, seosndod by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
Chesterfield County since 1~13; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Albright has devoted her adult years to the
~ducation of children in Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, The ~onorable Whaley M. Colbert, Chairman and
was one of Ms. Albright's students; and
enriched several generations of Chesterfield youth; and
the ~a~oaoa District for mor~ ~han forty years; and
Hill ~raneh Library the "Shirley C. Albrlght Building."
resolution b~ pe~anently recorded among the papers of this
8.G.l.b. RECOGNIZING ~IRL S~OUTS UPON ATT~ININ~ T~ ,~OLD
8.~.l.b.I. N~. O~ROLINE V. /4;0kTIN, TROO~
On mo~ion of ~r. ~arber, seconded by Mr. Warren, t~e Boar~
adopted the following reuulution:
WHEREAS, th~ Girl Scouts of the United ~tates of America
founded to promote citizenship training and personal
development; and
WHEREAS, after earning four interest project patches, the
Career Exploration Pin, the Senior Girl Scout Leadership Award,
t~e senior Gi~l Scout C~allengo, and designing and impl~mentlng
a Girl Scout Gold Award project; and
WHeReAS, =he Gold Award is the highest achievement award
in Girl Soouting and symbolizes outstandinq accompli~h~ent~ in
the areas of lea4er~hip, community $~rvlce, car~er planning,
~EREAS, the Gi~l Soout Gold Award can only be ~arned by
girls aged 14-17 or in grades 9-1~ and is received by loss than
6 percent of those individuals entering th~ Girl ~couting
94-653 9/14/94
WHEREAS, Miss Caroline V. martin, Troop 1~0, sponsored by
Providence Unitsd Methodls% Church, ka~ accomplished ~h~se high
standards and ha~ b~sn honored with the Girl scouts of the
United States of America Gold Award by the Commonwealth Girl
Scout Council of Virginia; and
WH~Ik~AS, growing through her experiences in Girl S¢~utlng,
learning the lessons of responsibl~ citizunshi~, and pridin~
herself on ~he gre~t a¢complishm~nt~ of h~r County, Caroline is
indosd a member of o new generation of proparsd young citizens
of whom we can all be very proud.
~OW, THEREFOR= B= IT Rt$OLVZD, ths~ the Chesterfield
County Boa~d of Supe~¥isors ~e~eby extends it~ songratula~ions
to Miss Caroline V. Martin and acknowledges the good fortune of
th= County to have such an outstanding y0~g woman as one of
its oi=izens.
On motion of Mr. Barber~ ~econded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS~ the Girl Ssouts of the United states of America
is an organization ~erving over Z.6 million girl~ an~ was
foundad tn promote citizenship training and personal
development; and
WS~R~S, after Gaming four int~r~nt project patche~, the
career Exploration Pin~ the senior Girl scout Leadership Award,
the Senior Girl scout Challenge, and designing and implementing
a Girl Scout Gold Award project; and
WHEREAS, the Gold Award is the highest achievement award
in Girl sooutin~ and symDolizes outstanding accomplishments in
the areas of leadership, community.service, career planning,
and personal dovslcpment; and
W~A~, tho Girl Scout Gold Awsrd can only be earned by
girls aged 14-17 or in grades 9~12 and is received by less than
· percent of those ind~v~dual~ eh:sting toe Girl
WHEREAS, Miss ~e~edit~ A. ~artin, T~oup lO0, sponsoued by
Providence united ~e~hodi=t church, hs~ accomplished these high
standards and ~as been honored wit~ thu Girl Scouts of
united states of America Gold Award by =he commonwealth Girl
Sse~t Council of virginia; and
WHEREAS, growing through her experiences in Girt Scouting,
learning the ~esson~ e~ responsible citlzenshi~ end ~riding
herself on the great accomplishments of her County, Meredith is
indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens
of whom we can all he very proud.
NOW, TH~P~FOR~ B~ IT R~SOLV~D, that the Chesterfield
County Board of supervisors hereby extends its congratulations
to Miss M~redith A. Martin and ac~nowledge~ th~ good fortun~ of
the County to have such an outstanding young woman as one of
its citizens.
94 654 ~/1~/94
8.~.1.¢. RECO~NIZIN~ SEPTF~BER 20. 1994 ~S.~]{~TERFIELD
COUNTY TOTAL QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (TQI)
on Notion of Mr. Barber. seconded by ~r. War~n. the ~ourd
a~opte~ the following resolution:
~5{EREAS, Chesterfield County is a First Choice co~ity
demonstrating azcellence in public ~ervlce; and
~ER~S, ~terfield County i~ damply codified to the
continuous impruv~men% of s~rvices for th~ benefit of all its
systematic Total Quality Improvement initiative, demonstrating
public sector leadership and a genuine desire to improve
~ucc~mfully trained num~rou~ staff in ~ality improvement
~R~9. County employees have demons=rated outstanding
efforts; and
WE~R~S, these efforts have rasulte~ in =he successful
completion of numerous quality improved%ut projects, providing
b~t~r ~erwices ~ citizens mn~ %hereby e~ancing the quality
County Hoard of supervisors doss hereby e~ress its sincere
appreciation to all employees for their ~ediGated effor~ to
their time and talents by proclaiming September 20, 1994
"~esterfield County TQI Celebration
8,G.l,d, REBOLUTION OF APPREGIATIO~ TO F~NGEEBTER HIGH
On motion of Er. Barber, seconded by ~n~. Warren, the ~eard
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Manchester High School has instituted a High
School Crime Solvers Pre.ram;
WHEREAS, instituting and supporting such a program ha~
be~n a joint effort by the Chesterfield~Colonial Height~ Crime
Solw~rs Board of Director~, the administration, faculty, staff,
students, and P.T.A. of M~n~hester High School~ and
WH~EAS. thereby the students at ~anchester High
have said to those who would contmit crimes, "net here"; and
%~t{EREAS, Chesterfield County/Colonial ~eight~ Student
Crime Solvers Program has been reeogalzed by the Governor's
office of th~ CommOnWealth of Virginia as a model program; and
~EI{EAS, such positive action is in the interest of the
school, the coun~y~ and the commonwealth; and
94-655 9/14/94
.......................... L .... ~ _..I L I L
contribution.
~OW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors commends ~anchaster ~igh Sc~ool and
all those involved in this effort on their initiative and
public spirit in implementing and supporting this program to
reduce crime end improve the quality of life for all citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
on motion oS ~r. ~arber, se=onded by ~r. Warren, the Board
waived~ as provided in the Virginia code, t~e necessity to read
the minutes of Board meetings in order for them to be signed by
the new Board Cha~rm~n.
~ote: Unanimou~
~,~.z. A]~PROVAL OF ~ENDNENTS TO ~ERVIGB AGREEMENT WITH
RIVERSIDE R~ION~ JAIL ~TBORIT¥
On motion of ~r. Barber, seconded by ~r. Wmrren, the Board
approved amendments to the ierviceAgreement with the Riverside
~egional Ja~l Authority, which amendment~ will allow
Chesterfield County to hold 250 inmates at the County Jail
Facility instead of the 190 inmates allowed by the current
agreement; and an amendment which will substitute the County's
currant $~ millioa obligation under the bond anticipation notes
for a $3 million obligation under the ps.anent bends d~ing
the antlciDated censtruotien period. (It is noted a copy of
the amendments is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
$,G,4. ~UTHO~ZkT~0N ~OR GOuh"~y ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE
PROJECT AGRBEKENT WITH CE]4TR~L ~RG~NI~ W~%STE
AUTHORITY FOR HOUSEHOLD H~SARDOUS WASTE
authorized the County Administrator to execute a special
project agreement between th~ Central Virginia Waste Management
Authority (CV%~i{A) and Chesterfield County for a Household
~azardous Wast~ Collect~on~ Hauling and Disposal Program, which
Program expansion.)
Vote: Unanimous
au~huri~ed the county Administrator to make application and
accept Federal Aviation Administration (F~) eR~ ~tate
De~ar%ment of Aviation (VDA) Grast~ and enter into contracts
with the Federal and State government~ for expenditure of
funds; authorized ~ha Cuunty Admlnistrator to solicit bids for
Airport Improvement Project~ (Corporate Ts×ivey a A~ociated
Apron Construction and Aseocla~ed Engineering Fee~) and enter
into contracts with applicable lowest responsive and
responsible bidders; and appropriated all Federal
and State ($37,096) funds allocated for this project. (It is
noted the balance of ~he funds, ~24~490t is available in the
Airport Capital Projects Fund to match the Federal and ~tate
8.G.6. A~RO~Ri~TION OF ~U~DS
On mo{ion of ~r. ~urbar, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
appropriated $17,000 from the Dale Dimtrict Three Cent Road
Fund for the rssurfacing of Gravelbrook Drive and Chicora Drive
and authorized staff to enter into agreements with the Virginia
Department of Transportation/contractors ts have the paving
completed.
Vote: U~animous
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
appropriated $~00 from the ~ermuda District Thre~ Cen~ Rued
Fund for repairing potholes on Lindberg Dr~ve.
DATE ~0R ~DBLI~ HEARING TO 00NZZDER AN ORDINANCE
TO AKEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF (~{E~TERVIELD.
9,i-3,1 THrOUgH ~,1-7 RELATING TO FIRE PREVENTION ~N~
PROTECTION
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board set
the date of October 12, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. for a public h~arlng
=o consider an ordinanc~ to amend thm Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1~78, as amended, by amending and reenacting
Saotion~ 9.1-3.1 through 9.1-7 relating to fire prevention and
protection-
Vote: Unanimous
8.~.8. REQUEST TO APPROVE CONTRACT AND SET DATE FOR PUBLIC
~IN~ TO ~ON~TD~R ~t~W~ OF L~D ~OR ~EN~EY
STATION
On notion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
approved a contract for the exchange of a 0.10 acre parcel for
e 0.03 acre parcel, w~ich i~ needed to ~ake the n~cessery reed
improvements in conjunction with the construction of ~ensley
~ire Station, from Mr. Harry L. Hamilton and M~. Elleen W.
Hamilton; authorized the County Administrator to sign the
1994 at 7:00 p.m. for a p~lic hsaring to consider th~ sxchange
of land for Bensley Fire ~%ation. (It is noted a copy of the
plat ~ filed with ~ pa~mr~ of thls Board.)
8.S.9. REOUESTS FOE BINSOIRAFFLE PERMITS
on motion of Mr. Barb@r, ~econded by Mr. Warren, the Board
approved raffle permitm for Bensley-Bermuda Volunteer Re, cue
SqUad, Ladies Auxiliary7 Chester Jaycues; Endowm=nt Fund of the
Memorial Child Guidance Clinic; and L. C. Bi~d High SChool
Music Boosters, for calendur year 1994.
Vote: Unanlnou~
INITIATION OP ZONING APPLICATION FOR C~NTERPOINT~
On motion of Hr, Sarber, ~ecen~ed by ~r. Warren, the ~oard
initiated a zoning application to amend e conditional Use
~lanned Development (case $~$117 and SPSNQlPO); waived
4g-1(1) 6; and appointed Senior Battalion Chief Paul Shorter as
agent.
B.S.~i. REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM PORTION OF A FIFTEEN FOOT WATER
Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion
a copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
approved a request from ~r. and ~r~. William C. Hahn to
con~truot a treated wood fence within an existinq sixteen foot
subject to the execution of a license agreement. (It iu noted
a copy of the vicinity ~ke~ch io filed with ~he paper9 o£ thio
Board.)
approved a request from Prince G~orge Service Corporation to
install e private water service within a sixteen foot water
Incorporated, ~ubjeot to the execution of a license agreemen~
and a water connection agreement. (It is noted a copy of the
plat i~ filed with the papors of thio Board.)
8.~.1~. DRSI~NATION OF RIGHTS OP WAY
8.G,13.a, ~EB Bi~I~ ROAD
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, ~/~e Board
designated righ~ o~ way for James River Road and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the necessary declaration. (It
is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed wi~hthe paper~
of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.G.13.D. WEST KRAUSE
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Wnrren, the Board
designated right of way for West Krauss Road and authorized the
County Administrator to execute the necessary declaration. (It
is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed with the papers
of this Board~)
adoR~e~ ~e followin~ resolution:
WHEREAS, t~s Virqinis Department of Transportation has
conjunction with Project Q~88-0~0-10~,CS01, and, as a
i~ r~que~ting the Board of Supervisors to abandon portions of
roads no longer ssi-ring a public need and to approve the
addition of new roads aR~roved by th~
~up~rvlsors doss hereby abandon, as a part ef the secondary
system of state highways~ a portion of Newby~ Bridge Road
by the Virginia Department of Transportation, which ~ketch is
incorporated herein by reference, pursuant to section 33.1-155,
hereby approve bbs addition of a portion of relocated Newbys
Bridge Road, Courthouse Road, Belmont Road, Clalrpolnt Road,
of ~tat~ hiqhwaym identified o~ the abeve referenced sketch,
~NS, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this
resslution ~e forwarded to the Resident ~ngin~r for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
does hereby request that the Commonwealth Transportation
Bridge Road (Routs 651] and Claypoint Read (Route 651) hereby
secondary system of ~tats highway~ pursuant to Section 33.1-154
of the Code of Virginia.
94-659 9/14/94
8.~.1~. ACCEPTANCE OF PARCEL OF LAND ALONG OLD STAGE ROAD
FROM FIBERZ FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
accepted, on behalf of the Countyr the conveyance of a parcel
of ]and containing 0.65S acres along Old Stage Road from Fibers
Federal Credit Union and authorized the County Administrator to
execute the necessary deed. (It is noted a copy of the plat is
file~ with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
8,~.16. APPROVAL OF UTILITIEB O0NTRA~TB
8,G.l~.a. ASRBROOK. BBCTION 5 ~ND ASHBRDOK PARKWAY BX~NSION
On motion of ~r. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
approved a utilities contract for Ashb~ook, ~eotion E and
A~bbrook Parkway ~×ten~ion~ Contra~t ~umber 9~-0056, as
follcws, which project includes 2,810 L.F.+- o~ 12 inch wu~er
line and 2,12S L.F. of 18 inch wast~w~ter line and authorized
tho county Administrator to execute any necessary documents:
Developer: S & B Development Company of
Virginia
Contractor: R.M.C. Construction Company
Contract Amount: ~stimated Total
Total Estimated County Coat:
Water (Oversizing) $
Wastewatar (Ovarsising} $ 36,476.16
{R~fund thru ~onn~ction~)
Estimated Developer Cost: $164,300.14
Code: Wa~er (Oversizing) ~S-~72VQ-~4C
Wautuwater [Oversizing) 5N-572V0-E4C
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
Contract Number ~3-022~, as follows, which project includes
1,411 L.F.+- of 10 inch wastawatsr line and authorized the
County Administrator to e×~cute any necesmary determents:
Contractor: Coastal Utilities
Contract Amount: Estimated Total $122,481.44
Total Estimated County Cost:
(Refund thru connections)
Estimated Developer Cost: $11~,B16.53
Vote: Unaninous
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
accepted the following reports:
Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a report on tbs developer
water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
Mr. Remsey pre~ented the Board with a status report on the
General Fund ~alance; Reserve for ~utu~e capital Projects;
School Beard Agenda.
Mr. Ramsey stated the virginia Department of Transportation has
fore,ally notified the County of the acceptance cf the following
roads into the State Secondary System:
ADDITION8 L~NGTH
Route 4564 (Thornhill Drive) - P~o~ Route 828
to 0.~6 mile West Route 828
Route 48~5 (Farmstead Way) -- From Rout~ 4564
to 0.07 mile southeast Route 4864
Route 4866 (Thornhill Court) - From Route 4864
to O.OS mile South~a=t Route 4~64
Rout~ 4867 (Ro~khavgn Drive} - From Route
to ~.07 mile South Route 4864
Route 486~ (Rystock Court) - Prom Route 4864 tu
0.04 mile ~outh Route 4854
Route 4869 (Nominl Court) - From Route ~85~ to
0,04 mile Southwest Route 4854
SECTION 2 - (Effective
Routs 4865 (Thornhill Terrace) = From Route
to 0,07 mile ~erthweat Route 4864
~oute 4869 (Thornhill Place) ~ From Route 4864
to 0.15 mile ~ortheast Rout~ 4864
WALTON BL%rFF - (Effective
Route ]760 (Walton Bluff Parkway) - From
mile North Route 3768 to 0,10 milo Southwest
R~ute
Route 3985 (Walton Bluff Landing) - From Reute
3750 to Route 3986
Route 3986 (Walten Bluff Terrace) - From ~.1~
mile ~outh Route 39S5 to 0.14 mile ~ortheast
Roots 3985
Route 3987 (Wa/ton Bluff Circle) - From Route
$9~$ to 9.04 mile ~sst Rou=e 3986
Route 3988 (Walten Bluff Court] - From Route
5986 to 0.04 mile East Rout~ 3gq6
Route 3989 (Walton Bluff ~!aee) - From Reute
3985 to 0.03 mile Northwest Ro~te 3986
Vote: Unanimou~
o,4~ ~i
o. o? Mi
O. O~ ~i
0. O? Mi
8,04 Mi
0.04 Hi
O. 07 Mi
0 · 15 ~i
0.03 Mi
0,87 Mi
O. 04 Mi
O. 04 Mi
0.03 Mi
9/14/94
Mr. Daniel re~ue~Ted the Clerk to read each of the Executive
Sessions separately to allow for each item to be voted upon
individually.
ll.A. PD~UANT TO SECTION 2.1-344.A.L.. CODE OF VI~GINIA~
R~LATIN~ TO DISCUSSIONS OF POTENTIAL APPOINTH~NT$ To
Mr. Barber made a motion~ seconded by Mr. MeHale, for the Board
344.A.1.~ ~ode of vi~_qj%Dj~a, relatinq to discussions of
potential appointments to ~atosca District Bupervisor position-
~r. Daniel referred to t~e minutes of August 24, 1994 in which
he stated he would not vote for nor participate in any
Executive Session or ¢!ose~-doo~ meeting cf the ~oard of
~upervisors representing Natoaca District. ~e ~urth~r s~ate~
he feel~ the~e items should be discussed in an open meeting fo~
~he public te o~eerve and an open meetin~ i~ the only way the
Board can he held accountable for its action=. He stated he
will not vote in favor of holding this Executive Session.
Mr. Warren stated based on the fact that he supported a public
Supervisor and ~ince it did not pass by a majority vote, he
would support the Executive Se~eion a~ he feels the board would
Mr. Mc/~ale ~tated unfortunately the char%er does not outline
the process in which the Board of Supervisors will select a
replacement for one of its menbers and pest practise of the
through two selection processes to replace Board members and
feel the public haarin~ p~ocess is'the appropriate metho~ to
determine the will cf the citizens and that the will cf the
citizens con only be determined t~rough an election. He then
Boar~ of Supervisors upon their resignation or death in office.
Mr. Daniel stated he believes that i~ currently cowered by
ninety-day windaw before general election, however, the Board
Mr. McHale sta~ed it i~ his understanding =hat in Y. hi~ Dre~e~s,
the Board has the opportunity to nominate an individual until
general election.
process, he would like the issue of hawing ~ special election
to fill the remainder of a sup~rvisor's term included in the
legizlative ~ackage ~s a Charter amendment.
F~r. Micas clarified that discussion of a process ia not an
appropriate E~ec~tive Session, but discussions of potential
candidates, qualifications, and individuals is approprlat~.
qualifications, and individuals is the intention of this
~×e¢~tive Sa~ioD.
F~r. MeHale then called for the vote for the motion made by Mr.
Barber, ~econded by him, for the S~ard to go into an Executive
Session ~ursuant to Section 2.1-344.A.1., Cod~ of vir inia,
relating to diacu~ions of potential appointments to Matoaca
Di~trlct Superv±~or position.
Ayes: ~r, ~¢Hale, Mr. ~arber, and Mr. Warren.
Nays: Mr. Daniel.
ii.B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.1-344.A.7., CODE OF ?IR~INIA FOR
CONSULT~TIO~ WIT~ LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING ACTUAL
PURSUANT TQ 5ECTIOM ~.1-344(A) (?), COD~ O~ VIROlNIA,
TO DI~CU~R SEECIFIC LE~ MATTER~ REL~TIN~ TO SEXu~
HARASSMENT CLAIMB
~Lr. Daniel made a ~oticn, seconded hyMr. Warren, fort he Boa~d
Code of V~r~inia for consultation with legal counsel re~arding
actual litigation relating to enforcement o£ ~he uniform
Btatewide Buildinq Code and pursuant to S~ctlon
Code of Virginia, ~950, as amended, for consultation with legal
counsel to discuss ~pecific legal matters relating to sexual
harassment claims.
Mr. McHale, ~r. Barber~ and Mr. Warren went into E~e~ut~ve
Session 9ursuant to Section 2.1-344.A.1., Ce.de of Virgini.~,
relating to discussions of potential appointments to ~ateaca
District Su~ervieer position.
Reconvening:
On motion of Mr. McHal¢, seconded by ~ir. Barber, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WZ4ER~As, the Board Of supervisors has =his day a~journed
into Exeeutiv~ S~ion in accordance with a formal ~ote Of the
Beard end in accordance with ~he Drcvlslons of the Virginia
Freedo~ of Information Aot; and
W~EREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act,
~ffectlve July 1~ 1989~ pro,ides for certlficatlen that ~uch
~eoutive Session was conducted in conformity with law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT P~ESOLYED, the Board of Supe~isors
does hereby certify that to th~ best of each m~ber's
from open meeting requirements under ~e Freedom of Info~ation
certificatien applies~ and
ii) only such public bu~ine~ mattsr~ a~ were identified
in the Motion by which the Executive Session was convened were
heard~ dlsouesed, or considered by the Board. Ne m=mber
dissents from this certification.
The ~oard being polled, the vote was as follows:
~. Daniel : Did not vote as he did not attend.
Mr. Barber : Aye,
The Board ~hen w~nt into Executive Session pursuant to Section
2.1-344.A.7., Code of Virqinia, for consultation with legal
the Uniform Statewide Building Code and pursuant to Section
2.1-344(A)(7), Code of Virginia, 1950, a~ amended, for
connultation with legal ccun~l to di~cus~ specific legal
matters relating to sexual harassmen~ claims.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution;
WHEREAS, tbs ~oard Of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the
Bosrd and in sccordsnco with the provisions of ~ha Virginia
~r~edom of Information Act7 and
WHEREAS, the virginia Freedom of Information Act,
nffeotlve Jul~ 1, 1989, provides for certification th~% such
~xecutive Session wa~ conducted in conformity with law.
~0W, T~ER~FORE BE IT R~SOLV~D~ the ~oard of Supervisors
does hereby certify that to the be~t of each member's
knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully e~empted
from open meeting reguiraments under the Freedom of Information
Act wsre discus=ed in the ~scutivs S~s~ion to which this
certification applies, and
ii) only suoh public b~siness matters an were identified
in the Notion by which the Executive Session was convened were
dissents from this certification.
Th~ ~oard being p011md, th~ vot~ was ~ followm:
M~. Daniel ~ Aye.
~r. ~arb~r : Aye.
Mr. McHate : Aye.
r~cessed to the Adm~nletrat~on Building~ Room 502~ for dinner.
Vote: unanimou~
Mr. MoEale read into the record the following statement:
"chesterfield County has been re,pensive tc citizens with
Building Code compliance i~suea as evidenced by the Countyts
~eedine~ to go above and beyond an~ assistance
specified by law.
~Cr example, cu~ ecmprekcnslve citizens Assistance Pro,ram,
designed for people with home~ adversely affeched by expanslve
soil, has many valuable components, inoludin~ ~rovisians for
engineering studies, legal services, lean g~arantees, repair
discount Droqram~, and help in following up an warranty claims.
We have also worked with the ~aneral Assembly in changing the
law to lengthen new home foundation warranties from one to five
years and to lengthen the statute of limitations from one to
two years.
The staff has presented information regarding the recent ruling
by the State Teohnical Review Board that requlras building
inspectors to issue notices of violation whether or not the
violation was discovered within th~ statute of
The ruling does not appear compatible with any state or
that this requirement will afford homeowners an~ additional
cf limitations.
This ruling could potentially provide for notices of violations
to ~uilders for ~uildin~e constructed decades ago without a
statute of limitations. After careful consideration of th*
course that Chesterfield County should follow, we support the
W~ will comply, however, with t~e ruling in %he in~erlm.
County building officials will conduct inspections and issue
notices will cover outstanding Code violations without ~egard
%o th~ statute of limitations. A let%er will be mailed to all
cur Citizens Assistance ~r0gram. This letter will inform them
cf the ability to receive a notice of violation should they
desire
This request for legal review in no way diminishes the Countyts
willingness to work with homeowners who feel they may have
Building Code violations in ~eir ~omes. On t~e contrary, we
will continue to do all we cum to work with individuals who
do nothing to uctually improv~ the process.
We expect th~ County Attorney to ask for the judicial review
within ~ha next twa waa~s and we understand a ruling could take
several months. Again, we will ismue notic~ of vlo]ation ag
requested by hemeo%nlers althonghthere is not a legal ba~is for
supporting these notices beyond the statute of limitations. We
will continue to do so until such time am a legal ruling is
rendered.
Pinally, we thank all citizens for their patience and
understanding aa we attempt to provide quality service to
Chesterfield County. This approach ~ndersocres our ~ince~e
desire to work within all appropriate avenues to address
Building Code violations. Thank you."
(It is noted'a copy of the statement is filed with the papers
of this Board.)
94-655 9t~4t94
13, INVOCATION
Mr. McHale introduced R~verend Nail Wheeler, Pastor of Chester
Christian Church, who gave ~he invocation.
· 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANC~ TO TH~ ~L~ OF T~ UNITED 8T~TE~ O~
AMERICA
Mr. Eddie Fisher, Troop S06~ led the Pledge of Allegiance tu
the Flag of the United States of America-
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WH~, the Buy SeQ~h~ u£ America was incorporated byMr.
William D. Boyca on February S, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Seout~ Of America was foUnded to
citizenmhip tralnlng, personal development, and fitnemm of
iEdivid~alm; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in
e wi~e variety of ~ial~s, serving in a leadership position in
a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his
community, being active in the troop, demonstrating scout
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
W~F~R~AS, Mr. ~ames Paul Dixon Troop 806, sponsored by
Woodlake united Methodist Church~ has accomplished those hiqh
standards of commitment and has r~ached the long-sought goal of
Eagle Scout w~ic~ is received Dy less t~an two 9ercen~ of those
individuals entering the scouting movement; and
~EREAS, growing through his'e~eriences in Scouting,
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding
himself on the great aecomplimhments of his County, James
indeed a me,er of a new generation of prepared younq citizens
of whom we can all ~e very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, %ha% the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisor~ hersby e~tends its congratulations
to ~. Jam~ Paul Dixon and acknowledges the good fortune
~e County to hav~ such an outstandin~ young man as on~ of its
accompanied by his father, and congratulated him on his
ou:standinq achievement.
~X~ Tv-s: THE VIRGINIA OFFIC~ OF ERERGE~CY ~EDICAL
~ERVIOE8~ ~ EHILI~ MORRIS.
SYBT~4"
Chief Eane~ int~oducedMr. Rich Adams with RDA and Associates;
~r. ~en MoK~el, Ms. Pam Magee, and Mr. Mike Raff with WRIC
8; ~4~. Tar~y Coy with the Virginia Office of Emergency Medical
Serviee~; Mr. Eric Brough=on, ~-~. Daniel Lynch, Jr., and
Jim Mohr with Philip Morris who were present to receive the
r=~olutions.
On ~0tion ef the Board, the following r~uolution was adopted:
WI{EREAS, on A~g~$t 6, 1993, Chesterfield County assisted
Colonial Neights, Virginia, with emergency response and
recovery effort~ due to the tornedo that caused widegpread
damage in thio area; and
W~ERKAS, a team of very talented citizens provided their
expertise to produce two outstanding videotape programs to
document Chssterfield's assistance during this natural
disaster; and
~7KF=R~AE, .thmme videotapes have be~n umad to infor~ Our
coKumunity of our effort8 during this incident and to ammist
other emergency or~anizati0ne nationwide in %heir trainin~
programs for similar ~mer~smc~ re~ponse~; and
k~{EREAS/ the technical program titled "Tornado! Th~
applioati~n~ fo~ ~7 categori¢~ and awarded the high honor of a
Terry ~oy with the Virginia office cf Emergency Medical
Servicem; Mr. ~ric Broughton, ~r. Danlel Lynch, mr. a~d Mr. Jim
Mobr with Philip Morris lot their assistance in making thes~
proqram~ a reality.
A~D, ~E IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
r~ol~iun be permanently recorded among th~ papers cf this
Vote: Unanimous
McKeel, Ms. Magee, Mr. Raff, Mr. Coy, ~r. Breughton, Mr. Lynch,
PUBLIC NEA~INGB
TO'CONSIDeR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ~OD~ OF T~E
~OUNT¥ OF CKESTERPIRLD, ~989, AS A~END~D, BY REPEALING
~ECTIONB ~.~-~65 THROUOH ~1.1-~96.1 ~ND ADOPTIN~ AND
Mr. Stith ~tsted this date and tim~ ha~ b~su advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance relating generally to
~igns. He further stated at the Board's direction, th~
Planning Commission established a Sign Committee to rewiew
~igns in th= County; that the Committee met 1~ times o~er an 18
month period; and staff recommends a~proval cf the ~roposed
ordinance. He then introduced Mr. ~irkland Turn,r, Planning
A~mlni~trator for Plans Revlew~ te review the proposed
ordinance.
~er. Turner reviewed the County's proposed sign standards as
co,pared to He~rico County's and noted the County's sign
requirements are slightly more restricted than Henrlcu~. ~e
94-667 9/14/94
~tatsd staff has met with representatives frum the Richmond
Board of Realtors regarding residential directional lea~-i~
~igns and their Board has offered a compromise which would
permit no more than two generic lead-ln slgna at any street
interuection advertising residential prop=tried for uale, He
furtl~er stated this compromise should reduce the proliferation
Co~mittee's recomnendation regarding electronic me~sag~ signs
in which the signs could be permitted with the 15 minute
i~terval on message change or the Board can adopt a regulation
with any time interval it feels appropriate. ~e stated another
alternative available would be to adopt the proposed ordinance
as presented and refer to the Planning Commission a separate
ordinance amendment establishing electronic message signs as
restricted uses in commercial districts. He further stated by
establishing electronic message signs as restrictive uses, the
Board could impose such standards as spacing between the sign~
and an interval on the time of message change. He noted if an
applicant cannot meet those standards, they have the right to
come before the ~oard with a conditional use application. Ne
then stated an error in the draft ordinance allows the height
of freestanding signs for public and semi-public uses to be 20
feet and provided language wnic~ c~anqes that to 15 feet for
these types of signs. He briefly described benefits the
ordinance will nave far t~e business community and stated staff
recommends ado~tlon of the proposed ordinance.
~r. Warren eta~ed il was hie understanding that there was
citizen input into the process and general agrge~e~t with the
overall recommendations.
Mr. Turner mtated there wa& a citizens committee, far.ed by the
Planning Commission, that represented both businesses and
residential neighborhoods, an~ the group agreed that th~
overall ord~nan~ ach~ve~ what they hoped it would, whiSe ~ome
committee members might not agree with every part of the
ordinance.
F~. Warren e~ressed appreciation to ~[r. Turner, the Planning
co~u~ission, the citizen eom/nitres, and staff for their efforts
in de.eloping the sign ordinance.
~s. Terry ~ruitt stated she works for w.s. carnas construction
on the Sign Commit=es. She reviewed several differences in the
recommended ordinance and expressed concerns relative to the
~equirements, section (b)(5), relating to :he appeal prooess~
section (c), relating =e individually mounted or painted
Height, Section (a), relating to the eignheight being measured
Fre~standlng Identification Signs, relating ~o the height cf
3OO,000 sguare feet or greater in order to have a project
identification sign and stated she feels the Board should
considering lowering the cost of sign permits; the Retail
the Sign Committee until ~heir last meeting; and whethe~ the
development of the p~cposed ~ign ordinance.
do~ not feel the process should be crltlolzed as the business
community was everwhelmlng involved and represented on the
Committee; that the new sign ordinanc~ is a 1Q~ easier to
follow; that he feels the overall reason for redeveloping the
sign ordinance was to benefit both the g~neral public and the
business community; that an attractive bueiness area will
attract more consumers and customers; that he feel~ Merchants
can do a better job of selling, at less cost, by using
~aller ~ign at a lower height; and feels the revised sign
ordinance, as recommended by the Planning Commission, along
with inoreaeed enforcement efforts, is needed to imgrove
quality of life and busines~ image of the County. He further
sta~ed the Committee discussed electronic meesmqe signs and the
consensus was that they ~o~ld be a distraction to motorists;
thah the Committee eg~osed the message signs if it changed more
t~an once every ~5 minutes; that the con~en~u~ of th~ Committee
was to llmit directional lead-in signs 0nly for an open house;
and expressed.conCerns relutiv~ to enforc~auent of having only
two lead-ln sigma per interses~ion. Ha re~ueeted the Board
give favorable consideration to adopting the proposed sign
o~di~a~ce aa recommended ~y the Planning Commission. When
asked, he stated Mar. Rusty Miller, General Manager of Leqgett
Chesterfield Bus~nemm Council.
R~altors, s~ated they feel directional lead-in signs are vital
roadways that the County i~ Decking to ~ddre~s. she further
continue to assist homebuyers and sellers, the Association
~upports limiting ~eneric directional lead-in signs into
neighborhoodD to two and r~m~ving~e sign~ after the transfer
sample o~ a ~our s~are foot generic O~otional lead-in siqn.
suppor~s adoption ol th~ ~roposed ~ign ordinance; ~at h~
of available pro~erty is essential to efficiently
properties ~vailable in the County; that prohibiti~ th~ u~
owners in the County; that generic directional ~ign~ will allow
generic directional signs can be used by realtors throug~ouD
~e county.
ordinance no~ allowing for larger signs an6 slgn~ being The
same size and height for all bu~inen~s. ~e stated he
submitted into ~e record a copy of his co--ants.
concerns r~lative to siqns having %o be the same helqht and
size as they w~ll block each o~ out. Ha then presented a
brief video presentation on ~l~ctronic m~age ~ign~.
stated he is opposed to trav~lin~ and flashing sign~ as they
are hard to rea~; that a 15 minute change interval will no~
~o~r' se~on~ int~rvat on ~he signs~ that no traffic accidents
have been contributed to electronic me~ag~ ~ign~ anywhere in
94-~69 9/14/94
signs go up.
Mr. Warren inquired as to whether multi-color displays bays
been considered_ ~r- Tw~dt ~tat~d four color di~play~ are
popular throughout The country and ~s an issue that could be
regulated. He further stated flashing light bulbs on the ~igns
conl~ be programmed into the display and he mupDort~ the four
second interval and ne =raveling, flashlng, er bijou signs.
Mr. Berber inquired as to whether the four second interval
would increase Mr. Twedt's business as compared to the 15
minute interval. Mr. Twedt stated the 1~ minute change cycle
makes the display undesirable, ~pecifi~ally, due to the cost
investment involved. ~r. Barber then inquired as to the
average cost of an electronic message si~n. Mr. I%~edt ~tated
an average single line ~ie~lay costs approximately $15,000 -
$1S,O00, but could be as high as SIS0,000. He further stated
th~$e ~i~ hav~ been proven to ~f~ective in advertising
products.
Mr. ~ric Sunberg, owner of Southern Electronics, e~rpreseed
electronic message sign; that if he knew he could only show his
to a larger sign; that he feels an a~trlbute of the electronic
message ~ign~ i~ they allow n~aller byte~ of m~aqe~ to. be
shown at one time as opposed to the manual me,sage signs which
electronic message ~igns ere the ~o~t cn~t effective way to
advertise product~; tha~ he feels these signs will generate
additional revenue for the County; and that they are used
throughout the State and United ~tates and is the wave of the
out-cf-date; that he supports the four second change interval;
that limiting the signs in certain business zones could be
negatively impacting hie end other ~rea businesses; that he is
making a profit at his store since he has initiated his
on this issue.
he is in favor of a sign ordinance, however, i~ opposed to the
gasolin~ on a d~ily b~si$ because one cent a gallon will ~h~nge
supports price signs being e~smptsd or increased; smd feels
that where there are two different type~ of businesses, sign
Bourd to defer consideration of the sig~ ordinance to allow
~tafX tc meet with service station businesses to receive
additional input. Ke stated he feels price signs need to be at
to allow greater square footage of slqn area; and that he feels
road.
stations throughout the State. He further stated he owns the
94-67Q 9/14/94
ho ha~ received complaints from a neighborhood association
r~garding hie signs; that he supports the use of banner~ and
f~el they are bene£ioial to businesses; that he concurs with
price signs being 25 square feet; and e~pre~sed concerns
relative to problems he has personally encountered with tho
interpretation of the current sign ordinance and the ordinance
sta~ing in~stere signage could not be visible to %he exterior
of the building. When asked, he stated the complaints he
received abou= his signs was from the Deer Run Assooiatlen. He
further stated he is building a Chevron Station across the
street from his Citgo Station and i~ having problems with area
resident~ on how wid~ th~ blu~ stripe on the canopy eho~id be.
Mr. Dan McMurtri~, founder of Pullets Fast Food Restaurants,
expressed the importance of ~ignage for ~all businesses;
u~e of sign~ge being critical to a growing business; tha~ he
feels tan ~uare feet of signals for reader
inadequate for advertising; that his reader board is critical
consideration of %he sign ordinance to receive additional in,ut
There was brief discussion relative tc complaints received
regarding Bullets ~es~aurant not being in compliance with the
sign ordinance and %hat having prompted review of the ordinance
when it displayed an illegal inflatable balloon sign
advertising its business.
~L~. Mc/~urt~ie ~tated h~ is aware that he had a sign that
violatlon and that his business has not used any illegal signs
since that time. He further stated ks f~is inflatable
balloons should b= allowed for special occasions such es a
grand opening.'
~r- Warren stated he ~upports deferring adoption of the ~i~n
ordinance to allo~ for further review. He further stated be
understands the issues addressed regarding ~ha 25 square foot
signs and he feels generic directional signs may be a positiYe
idea.
~ohn Cogbill, ~squire, Chairman of the chesterfield
Cou~cil~ stated the toenail ~as been involved in this process
from th~ h~ginning; that he feels there have Dean some
legitimate points expressed that w~rrant further consideration7
ordihance to allow for further review. Ee further stated he
feels the propose~ ordinance ia a signifioen= improvement over
pas~ sign ordinances and commended the sign Committee for their
efforts in ad~resslng the ordinance.
Mr. David stephens, owner of your Signs and Permit Serviees~
stated he feels ~erbiage in the proposed ordinance is
follow; that certain Darts of the ordinance need to be reviewed
further; that the Sign Committ~ ha~ done a goo~ job in 9utting
the ordinance together; that fees for sign permits should be
addresssd~ specifically, lowering the cost; and that he concurs
with the comments already expressed t~at the ordinance needs to
be enforced-
There being n~ one else to address this ordinance, the public
hearing wa~ mlomed.
Mr. Barber stated he supports deferring adoption of the
ordinance to provide an opDor=unity to ad~rese the conuurns
uXpruss=d. H= further stated enforcement of the ordinance has
always been a problem am it relates to violations and he feels
the County needs to streamline its enforcement effort through
the Po/ice Department. ~e ~ta~ed he feels electronic message
signs serve a purpose in advertising and ~hould not be banned.
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
deferred consideration of adepting an ordinanoe to amend the
Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1989~ ss amended, by
repealing Sectlon~ 21.1-265 through 21.1-270.1 and adopting and
enaoting Sectien~ 21.1-270.2 through 21.1-270~15 and amending
Section 2i-i-~8i relating generally ts signs to allow st~ff an
opportunity to summarize issues expressed through =he public
hearing pracez~, zpecifically, concerning service stations,
el~ctronio signs, generic direotienal signs, and other issues
of concer~ until october 12, 1994.
Vote: Unanimeus
It was generally agreed to recess for five minutes.
16.E. TO CON~IDBR A~ O~DINAN~E TO AMEND TH~ CODE
COUNTY OF CEE~TEP~TIELD. 1978. AS AME/~DED. BY AKE~DT~
publi~ h~a~inq to eon~ide~ an ordinance ~latin~ to ta~icab~
and other v~hicles for hire.
~ Barber stated he is chai~an of the Taxicab Advisory Board
and recognized representatives of Vst~rans Taxis who were
present at the me,ting. He noted he ha~ provided each Beard
member a copy o~ an ~ditorial from tke aichmond Time~ Dispatch
relating to
After brief discussion, on notion of ~. Barber, seconded by
~ ORDINANCE TO ~END TKE d0DE OF T~E COUNTY
Q~C~ESTERFIELD, 1~7~, AS ~NDED, BY ~ENDING
County:
amended, i~ amended and reenacted to read ~s fellows:
For ~ purposes of this chapter, ~e following words and
interohang~nbly meaning a passenger-car~ing, self-propelled
motor v~icle maintained for hire by the public and operated
upon th~ streets of the county in ~e transportation
or between fixed terminals and having a seating capacity of not
more than six (6) passengers but ~xcluding =o~on cmrriers of
parsons or property operating as puDlio carrier~ under a
~-~7~
certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the
State corporation Commission or under a franchise granted by
the county.
Sec. 19.1-3 Certificate Of mUblic convenience and necemsitv.
(a) ~equired. It shall be unlawful to operate or cause
tm be operated within the county any for-hire car unless a
ce~tifioate of'public convenience and necessity has been issued
to the owner thereof by the chief of police coverlnq the
operation of such vehicle and unl~mm th~ conditions,
regulations and restrictions set forth and prescribed in this
chapter have been complied with by such owner. An owner ohall
operate under only one certificate, and ~he certificate shall
provide for the operation of a specified number of for-hire
vehicles. I% shall be unlawful ~o operate ar cause to operate
more v~hisles than the number provided in the certificate.
Additional for-hire vehicles may he operated by e certificate
holder only upon written application on a form provided by the
chief of police, approval of such appticaticn~ payment of fees
this chapter.
e 0 0
(g) Minimum specifications for vehicles. It shall be
unlawful for a certificate holder to place into ~erwice a for-
hire vehicle unless the v~hicle im a four~door, hard top
vehiole and meets
apecificaticns:
1. Wheel size:
3. Curb weight:
or axuoeds ~he following ~inimum
Fourteen (14) inch~
One hundred six (106) inches.
3&00 lbs.
(h) Age and Mileage Limits of Vehicles Under Certi£icate:
It shall be unlawful for a certificate holder to plase into
service a far-hire vehicle which either is more than ton (10)
model years old or which has more than three hundred thousand
(~00,~00) miles at th~ time it is placed into ~ervi~e.
Effective January 1~ 1995, it shall be unlawful to operate any
v~himle for-hire which ~ither ig mor~ than ten (10) model years
old or which has more than three hundred thousand (300,000)
sec. 1~.~-4 Inspection of vehicleo.
Every far-hire vehicle fur which a certificate ham been
granted by the county shall he inspected by th9 chief of
pmli=~, or mome member of =he division cf police designated by
him or such ether reputable a~ency as the chief of police may
prdscribe, at regular intervals of at least every twelve (12)
months, and at such other times as the chief of police may
prescribe, tf such vehicle shall be found to be in an unsafe,
or to have inoperable air cmndltlonin~ cr heating equipment,
the owner thereof shall be n~tified by the thief of police et
once af sue~ defect and suc~ ve~icle e~all not be operated
thereafter until such defect has been renedied. If upon
inspection it is found that the odometer of a vehicle has been
unlawfully tampered with, th~ vehicle ~hall be permanently
rejected for u~e a~ a for-hire vehicle.
Sec. 19.1-5 Assignment of color scheme, number, etc.. bv chief
cf police.
(a) There shall be displayed on every for-hire lettering
clearly ~howing the name and number of the owner ther~o£ and
94-673 9/14/94
indicating that such vehicle i~ a for-hire car. Taxicabs shall
use only the words "taxi", "cab" er "taxicab" to indicate that
such vehicle is a for-hire car. The color scheme and the sfze,
content and character cf such lettering and the position
thereof on eac~h e~¢h vehicle shall be assigned by the chief of
police and no vehicle shall he operated under the prcvi~ions cf
thi~ chapter unless and until such assigned spe¢ificati~n~ have
been complied with. The failure cf any owner to complete with
such assigned specifications also shall constitute a violation
of this chapter.
(e) If a vehicle is for any reason taken out of service
as a vehicle for-hire on a permanent basis, the owner of the
vehicle shall within seventy-two (72] hours remove the assigned
decal along with all othe~ i~dioia of the vehicle's use us a
vehicle for-hire.
(d) It ~hall be unlawful to operat~ a vehicle which
meet the requirements of t_his section.
Sec. 19,1-10 Roof light~ failure, ets,, to use.
Eac~ taxicab ~all be e~ui~ped with a light prescribed by
the chief of police mounted to the roof of the ~axi~ab which
shall indicate to the publi~ that the vehicl~ is or ie not
under hire. The roof light shall be lit when the car is
available to the public for hire. Rooflights and meters shall
operate by u~ of on~ switch only so that the light will
automatically bs lit when the meter is not running. It shall
be unlawful for a driver to ~ail, refuse or neglect to operate
such roof light or to operate such light in a misleading
manner, suoh light shall be inspected during such inspections
provided i~ Section 19.1-4. Any taxicab found to have
defective roo~ ligh= shall not be operated as a fo~hi~e
until such defect is corrected.
,S~,..lSzlrl,4 Limitation on number of passengers in front and
It shall be unlawful for a driver to transport in a
taxicab more than the number of passengers for which the
vehicle is equipped with operable seat bales that h~ve been
lawfully installed whiGh, in any event, shall not exceed ~ix
(~) passengers.
sec. 19.1-26 certificate holder to have telephone listin=.
Every certificate holder shall provide and main%aim a:.all
times in the Greater Richmond telephone directory a listed
telephone in the name in which the certificate holder is doing
for-hiring business, by which calls may be made for for-hire
service. ~f the certificate holder opera:es f~vs (~) or more
for-hire Cer~ t~ tel~pho~ lis~ing shall also appear in the
there ba~ net yet been an opportunity to publish the listing in
the required direo=ories, the telephone number shall De
available from the Greater Richmond directory a~siEtance
service.
9114/94
See. 19.1-90 Record of ~alls to be keDt~
(a) The owne~ and the ~iver ufa fcr-hir~ car shall ke~p
a "manifest", which shall be a permanent record of the
transportation of each passenger. ~ach m~nifest shall include:
(~) The date and time each shift begins and ends.
o o s
sec. 19.1-36 Revocation of ne~mit.
Subject to t~c D~o¥i~ions cf Section 19.1-42, the permit
of any driver cf a for-hire ear shall in~ediately become void
and shall be immediately surrendered upon the occurrence of any
of thc following:
All drivers and certificate helder~ =hall notify the chief
of police within fifteen (la} days of the occurrence of any
e~ent enumerated in subsection (a), (b}, (o}, (d), (e) or (1)
above.
See. 1~.1-37 Issuance of permit after r~fusal; r~i~uanoe
after revocation.
Except as provided in section 19.1-9S below, any person
Section 19.1-~6 ~hall ne~ be eligible for issuance 0£ e new
under Sec=ion 19.1-35 no longer apply; provided, howe~er, that
if a driver's permit is refused or rsvsked for knowingly
making, or causing to be made, either directly or indirectly,
rat=s ~re~cribe~ by section 19.l-S, or a d/~ver's psrmit is
revoked under Section 19.1-36(d) or (e), such driver shall not
be eligible un~il ~welve (12] mcnt~s from the date oS refusal
or revocation.
o o o
S~c. I9.1-40 Revecation of certificate of n~_~3~......c.q~venience
and necessity.
Subject to the provision of Section 19.'1-42, the
c~rtiflcat~ of public conv~ni~n~ and n~e~ity shall
immediately become void and shall be im~edlately surrendered
~pon the o~urren¢~ of a~y Of the following:
o o o
(b) The chief of police determines, after investigation,
that the certificate holder ia in violation of section 19.1-26,
19.1-30 or 19,1-91, and the certificate holder knowingly fails
to comply with such sections within fifteen (15) days a~ter
notification e£ ~uuh violation.
Sec. 19.1-49 Reciprocity.
Upon a find by the chief Of police that the city of
Richmond, ~e~r~co County, ~anov~r County an~ any ~ounty or city
contiguoua to Richmond, Henries Ceunty~ Hanover County or any
of them has adopted mn ordinance containing provisions
94-675 9tl4/94
comparable to the county ordinance end providing~ for
reciprocity with the county, then vehicles for which a person
holds a current and valid certificate of public convenience and
necessity issued by the City of Richmond, Henrico County,
Hanover County, any county or city contiguous to Richmond,
Honrico County, Hanover County or any of them and drivers who
hold a current and valid per, it issued by the City of Richmondr
Henries County, Ranover County, any county or ¢i:y contiguous
to Eichmond~ Henri¢o County, Eanever County or any oft hem will
be deemed to have complied with the certificate and permit
requirements of this Chapter and shall bs d~emed to possess
comparable certificates or permits~ as the case may be, issued
by the ccunty whioh such city o: county certificates ar permits
issued by the city of Richmond, Ee~rico county, Hanover County,
any county or city contiguous to Richmond, Honrioo County,
Hanover County or any of th~m shall b~ valid in the county
where the hoZd~r oZ such csMti~icate s~ permit has applied for
and b~en refu~ed a permit or certificat~ by the county~ or has
had such permit or certificate revoked by,he county un,er ~ha
provi~ion~ of this Chapter and is not eligible for i~suanc~ of
That thio ordinance shall become effeotive
immmdiately upon adoption.
Unanimous
16. B/}JOURNF~E~T
on motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adjourned at 10:lB p.m. until September 2~, 1994 at 3:00 p.m.
Vote: Unanimous
County Administrst~r
9~-676