10-25-1995 Minutes MINUTES
October =~, 1995
8~pervlsors ia Attendance:
Hr. J. L. ~c~alo, III, Chai~am
~r. Arthur S. Warren, Vius Chrm.
Mr. Edward B. Barbor
Mr. Harry G. Daniel
Dr. Freddie W, NiC~OlaZ, S~.
M~. Lane B. Ra~sey
County Administrator
Mr. craig Bryant~ Dir.,
Utilitias
Ms. Marilyn Col~, Exec.
Asst. %o county Admin.
Ms. Faith L. Davis,
clerk =o the Board
Mr. William D. DuDler,
~uilOing Official
~r. Dr~dford S. ~ammer,
Deputy Co. Admin.~
Mr. Thomas E. Jaoeb~o~,
D~r.~ Plashing
Dr. Burl Lowe, Dir.,
Mr. Richard M. Mc~lf~sh,
Police Department
11. DIWNER
The Board adjo~rn~ at 5:50 P.m. from dinner in tho
Administration Building, Room 502.
Mr. MoHale called the regularly schadulad meeting to order at
O~ ~otion of D~. Nicholas, seconded by Hr. Warren, the Board
=pproved the minutes os October ll, 1995, as submitted.
Vote~ Unanimous
95-655 z0/25/95
initiatives relating to ~a~ged Care i~ M~ntal Health S~rvice~.
Dr. Lows ~ated the State Department o£ ~eutal ~ealth/~ntal
managed care proposal. Be further staked an alternative
initiative is being proposed which would incoMp0rate
concerns that have been expressed and adopt many principles
Boards including incorporating more o~ the ~unding and also
~roposal has been ~ntroduee~ to the S~ate ~ear~ an~ there are
election. Be further eta~ed staff has some major concerns
regarding two provisions in the proposal including that
Community Services Boar~s can either ~e a manager of servicer
or ~ provider of services, but cannot be beth. He orated
m~nger and provider. He stated another concern of the preposal
is that ultime=ely state hospi:el= will be turned over to local
and close at laamt one facility over the next biennium, He
refining the principles end concepts developed by the Virginia
P~rtnership of Virginia, has been werklnq with ~reen Sprlnge
Z~ntara in the ~igniDg of a contract which will gave
employees and their dependents an opportunity to receive mental
health services from Community Services ~earde. He stated the
the "Principles to Guide the Publicly-Funded Mental
Health/Mental Retardation/ Substance Abuse Services Syste~" and
the "Operational Canoapts" develoged and ~ubllshed by the
thi~ re~elutien also requests the Board cf Supervisors to join
the Community SsDvices Board in formally endorsing these
principles and concepts.
might be in the event cf the closing of a Shuts £uoility. mush
will be closed an~ that inpat~ents at a facility designated for
cle~uTe will probably be transferred to remaining hospitals in
the ~ystem. He emphasized that the major impact on lc~alitles
that this will transfer and significantly increase t~e number
of individual~ requiring behavioral Health car= saC-vices in
~r. ~amsey in%reduced Sr. Gary R. ~cLaren ~o recognize two
~artin and Associates, and ~4r. Tom Mitre, representing B~rald
Incorporated. ~ ~tated Barber Martlu and Associates is an
advertising ~irm which has grown more than 1,000 perce~t
County one year ago and has grOWn from eight employees to over
90 during the same period. He further stated Inc. Maga~in
the ~emier private industry and smull business magazine and
companies rarely attain a growth rate that merit their
prestigious ranking in the list. Ee congratulated the
companies £or their outstanding achievements.
Mr. BarBer and Mr. Mitre expressed appreciation fo~ the
recognition and stated they are proud to be a part of
Chesterfield County.
Mr. McHale congratulated the bueinee~, on behalf of the Board,
for their achievements and wished them continued
F~r. Ramsay introduced Chief Pittman wk0 ~ta~ed un incident
occurred at Swift C~eek Elementary School between 11:30 p.m. on
Friday, October ~0, 1995 and noon on Sunday, October 22, 1995
in which classrooms, restroom~, and the library were vandalized
with damage estimating at approximately $S,000. He further
~tated the i~oident is under investigation and several
ar~ being pursued. When aske~, he stated this is the
incident of this eave~ity at this ~chool.
~. Warren inquired as to whether the Police Department has
~ver addressed installing alarm systems a~ ~oheoi~. Chief
Pitt~n stat=d ularm syst~m~ has be~n addressed in the past;
~hat alarm systems Weald be an alternative that could be
considered by the ~chool Administration; and that h~
installing alarm~ systems would assist in the deterrence of
school vandalism.
There was brief discussion relative %o the =dst of installing
an alarm system at a school~ whether the~e is proper lighting
at Swift Cr~k ~lem~n%ary School; ~he frequency cf vandalism at
County ~chools; and the County's rate in apprehending criminals
co~u~ittinq acts of vandalism.
3. BOARD =OMNITT~B REPORTS
There were no Board Committee Reports at this time.
4. R~0UEeTS TO PO~T~ONB ACTION. EK~I%GENOX ADDITIONS.~_OR
On motion of ~r. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren~ the Board
deleted It~ 8.~,lO.b., Conveyance of Easement to Virginia
Electric ~nd Power Company to Install Underground ~ower ~e
Provide Service to %he Center P~inte Fire Station and added
Item ~.B.14. Adoption of Resolution ~ndoreing the "~rinciples
~m Guide %he Publicly-Funded Mental Health/Mental Retardation/
SmbstanceAbuse Services System" and the "Operational Concept~"
Developed and Published by the Virginia Ae~ooiation of
Co~munity Services Boards and, adopted the agenda~ as amended.
present to r~¢eive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, tho following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Sergeant Randolph ~ Watkins will retir~ from the
Chesterfield C0~ty Police Department on November 1, 1995; and
WKEREAS, Sergeant Watkins has provided over 18 years of
quality ~mrvice to the citizens of ohe~erfiel~ County; and
WHEREAS, SergeanL Watki~s has served the County i~ the
capacity of Patrol Officer~ Technician, and Sergeant;
WHEREAS, throughout the years, Sergeant watkinm
demonstrated an expertise in the fields of crime prevention and
hiqhway ~afety; and
WHERF~AS, Sergeant Watkins has significantly contributed to
the development of ~o~h ~ke C~as~e~field Polio~
Program and the Crime Prevention Unit -- making them t/ts highly
W~EREAS, Sergeant Watkinm h~ ha~ a v~y positive
influence on the developmen~ of ma~y yo~ poli~ officers in
th~ D.A.R.E. Pro,ram and Crime Prevention funutions of the
D~partm~nt; and
~REAS, ~ergea~t Watki~s went abov~ and beyond the call
of duty to the citizens of C~esterfield
Boy Scout Troop 822; and
WHER~S, Sergeant Watkins has provided t~e
County Police Oepartment with many years cf loyal and dedicated
WHER~S, Chesterfield county and ~e Board of
will miss Sergeant watkins' diligent service.
NOW, THZRZ~OR~ BZ IT REEOLVED, that the chesterfield
County Board o~ Supervisors publicly recognizes
the citizens of Chesterfield County, their appreciation for
service to the County.
AND, BE IT ~THER RESOLVED, that a cody of
re~olution be presented to Sergeant Watkins and that
resolution be permanently rscord~d among ~he papers of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield Co~ty, Virginia.
his dedicated service to the County, and wished him w~ll in hi~
~. WOR~ SESSIONS
There were no ~ork Sessions scheduled at this time.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8,A, STREETLIGHT INSTAL~TION COST ~PROVALS
O~ ~OtiO~ of Mr. z¢~ale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved the following gtreetlight Installation Cost Approvals:
* Inter,motion of Riversbend Boulevard and Meadowvilt~ Road
Cost to install light: $1~021.50
* Interseotion of ~tomeoFest Co,r% and Stoneorest Drive
Cost to install light: $1,S91.16
Intersection of Northcresk Drive and Stonecrest Drive
Cost to install light: $624.35
~,B, CONSENT ITEMS
S,B,1. ~UTHOHI~TTON.~OR COUNTY ADMINI~T~TOR To m~y FO~9
~REATiON OF FO~I{PCSITIONS
On motion of Dr. Nicholas, seconded by Mr. Warre~, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to a~ply for an~, upon
notification of award, appropriate funds, in the amount of
$9~,~4, from the Family Preservation and Family Support
Sel-vioes Program for Chesterfield County and the City of
Colonial Eeighta and authorized the =rcatiom of four positions.
(It is noted charge~ for direct costs of $7,700 have been
included in the epp!icatien for this gran~. The local Batch
a~o~nt will bm provided from Social Services and Mental
~ealth/Mental Retardation/Substance Abuse, ~nd ths Health
Departments for the on going grant years, therefore, th~r~ will
b~ no incremental oost to the General Fund.)
~PROPRIATION OF FEDERAL GRANT REVENUES TO T~R
DEV~LOPMENT~LL¥ DELAYED IN~ANTB
On motion a~ Br. Nicholam, mscendsd by Mr. Warren~ the Board
appropriated $191,639 of Federal Grant Revenuen to the
~eal%h/Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse
Department for services to developmentally delayed infants.
(It is noted approval cf thi~ request would not pre~ent any new
or additional oosts to the G~neral Funds as funds for the
S.E.~. ~gPRO~m~ATION OF STATE AND FEDE~A~ FUNDS ~OR THE
DEP~TM~T OF M~NT~L HEALTH/MENTAL RETANDATION ~ND
on motion of Dr. Nieholas~ seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
appropriated $44,61~ in Medicaid Waiver Revenue; $~,563 in
~e~icaid state Plan option Revenue; $53,659 in State c~apter
Ten Revenue; an~ ~ecrea~ed Federal Block ~rant by $4,044 for a
95-659 1Q/25/~5
net increase to the Mental Health/MeNtal Retardation and
SubstaNce Abuse Services Departm~Dt expenditure apprep=iations
of $123,796. IIt is noted Medicaid Waiver RevenUe included an
un%budgeted award to tko County of $~309 from the
Commonwealth, which will be matched by the Federal government,
for total funding of $44,618. Appropriation of the grants
revenue will no~ present any new or additional Go,ts to the
County General Fund.)
Vote: Unanimous
$.B,4o ALLOCATION OF ~IDL~RI~NDISTRICT THREE C~ ROAD
approved the allocation of ~4,10~ from the Midlothian District
Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to
Vote: Unanimous
BETWEEN M~DOWVILLE ROAD ~ 1-295
On metio~ of Dr. Wicholas, seconded by Mr. Warren~ the Board
approved the allocation of $1 million from the John Tyler
Community College Project to the Route 10 Widening Project,
with the understanding that th~ loan will be repaid over a
three year period from Virginia Depar=ment of Transportation
reimbursements; authorized the County Administrator to execute
a Virginia D=partmunt of T~ansDs~t&tion/county agreement
providing for ~he construction of the widening of the eantbound
lane of Route 10 from Meadowvill~ Road to 1-295, acceptable to
the County Attorney; and authorized ~taf£ to initiate an
amendment to Zonin~ Case 9~SN0109 to delete th~ r~quir=ment for
constructing the eastbound lane of R~ute 10 ~nd waive the
d~sctcsure requirements.
8.B.6, AWeD OF CONTRACT TO BURLEIGH ~ONSTRU~TION COMP~/~Y FOR
WOODRID~E RO~D DO~ CULVERT REPAIRD
0n motion of Dr. Nicholas, seconded by ~r. Warren, the Board
awarded a contraction contract to Burleigh Con,true, ion
Company, in the amount of $97,400, for Woolridge Ro~d Box
Culverts repairs and authorized th~ cowry A~in~mtrator to
are availmble in the project.)
Vo%~: U~animous
a.D.7. ~T~TE RO;%D ACCEPT~OE
This day the County ~nviron~ntal ~n~in~er, in accordance with
direction~ from thio Board~ made report in writing
examination of the road~ in a portion of Demrfi~ld E~tate~,
Section C and portions of Pm~pas Drive and Amsden Drive,
Matoaca District, and
Whereao, the ~eoident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental
Engineering, the streets in a portion of Deerfield
~estien C and portions of Pampas Drive and Amsden Drive~
Matoaca District, meet the requirements esLablished by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the virginia Department of
Transportation, and
~rnerea~, the County and the Virginia Doper%men% ef
detention/retention facilities in the county.
~icholas, seconded by Mr. Warren, it is resolved that the roads
in a portion of Deerfi¢ld Estutes, Section C and portions of
Pampas Drive and Am~den Drive, Hatoaea Dis~rict, be and t~ey
hereby ars e~tabliehed a~ public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Txansportation, be and is hereby requested to take into
Secondary System, pursuant to ~ecti~n 33.1-229, Cods of
virginia, and the Department's Subdlvlslen Street Requirements,
the following:
Name of Street: kmsden Drive Length: 0.07 mile
~rem: Existing AJ~sden Drive,
State Route ~067, at
~008
of Stagp~nn Road, ~tat~ RoUte
~uaranteed Right-of-Way of Width: 50 feet.
Name of Street: Pampas Drive Length: 0.13 mile
northeast of Chanelka Lane,
State Route 2068
To: Existing Pampas Drive, State
Route 2069, 0.04 mile south of
Fawndala Qrlvs, stats R~u%s 2007
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight
distance, clear zone and demi~nate~ Virginia Department Of
Transportation drainage easements indicatsd on the
These roads ss~me as access to adjacent subdivision lots.
Deerfield Estates is recorded as follows:
Section C. Plat Book 15, Pages 26 & 27~ ~arch 30, 1966.
These portions of Pampas Drive and A~sden Drive are recorded
Deed ~ook 15~3, Pages 240, 241, & 24~, February 6,
This day the County Environmen~&l ~nginesr, in'accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination cf the road Deed of Dedication of James Rivsr Road,
Midlothian District, and
Wheream, the Remident Engineer for the Virginia Department
Transportation has advised %~e Director of ~nvironmsntal
Engineering, the street Deed of Dedication of ~ames River Road,
Midlo%hian Distrlct~ mma~ the requirements ~stsblished by the
Whereas, the County and the Virqinia Department of
TranspQrtation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Book 2453, Page 405, January 21~ 19~4~ for all stormwater
detemtion/re%ontlon facilitiem in the County.
Therefore, upon ¢onsidorati~m wher~of~ and on motion of Dr.
Nicholas, seconded by Mr~ Warren, it is remelve~ tha~
Deed of Dedication of Ja~es River Road, Midis%blah District~ be
and it hereby is established am a public road.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, De an~ is hereby requested to take into th~
Seaondary ~ygtem, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
virginia, and the Depar=ment's Subdivision ~treet Requirements,
the following:
Fame Qf Streo~: Jame~ River Road Length: 0.57 mile
From: Robis~m Road~ State Route 711,
0.90 mile northwest of
TO: end of road, 9.57 mile north of
Guaranteed Right-of-Way of Variable width: 50 - 90 feet.
This request is iDolu~ive of the adjacent slope, ~ight
Tranmportation drainage eas~mentm indicated on the development
This road serves as acc=ss to adjacent public school aL well as
a ~ubdivlsion. These ruads were constructed with public funds
Deed of Dedication of Jame~ River Road is recorded as fo~lows:
Voter Unanimous
~.~.~. A~PROVAL OF C~%NGE
authorized th~ County kdmin~strator to execut~ Change Order
$~,09~, for the gahnk~ Road Transmission ~ain, Phase I Project
and authorized %he County Administrator =o execute the
Change Order are available in the current CaD,tel ImDrovement
legal recourse against a public utility for delaying a County
project.
Mr. McHate requested staff to report back tc him on thi~ issue
at the next Board meeting,
On ~cbicn of Dr. Nicholas, ae~onded by ~Ir. Warren, the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute Change Order
NumBer 18 ~o Sale Censtr~tio~ Cospany, in the amount of
$22,000, for the Bensley Fire Station Construction Contract and
are available in the Project budget.}
$.B.9. REOUE$T~ TO O~ITC~AEM
PORTIONS OF TWO ZIXTEEN FOOT WATRR EASEMENTS A~R055
authorized the chairman of the Eoa~d and the County
Administrator to ~xecute a quitclaim deed to vacate portion~ of
Associates, Limited. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed
PROPERTY OWNED BY WOODL~KE COMMUNITY ASSO~IATiON.
INCORPORATED
On motion of Dr. Nicholas, ~econded by Mr. Warren, the Board
authorized th~ Chairman of the Boa~d and the County
Administrator ~o execute = quitclaim dse~ to vacate a portion
of e sixteen foot d~ainage easement across property o£ Woodlaks
co~u~uni~y A~ociation, incorporated, lit is noted a copy of
t~e plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.B.10. CONVEYAECE OF ~$E~E~T~ TO WIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND
B.B.10.~. TO IN~T~LL UND~9~ROUND ~OW~R TO ~ROVIDE SERVICE TO
THE ~EW GENERAL ~ERVIOES W~/%EHOUSE
On mo=ion of Dr. Nieholae~ ~econded Dy Mr. Wa~en, the Board
authorized the Chairman o~ the ~o~rd and ~e county
Administrator to execute an easement agreement with virginia
Electric an4 Power Company to in, tall underground power to
noted a copy cf the plat ia filed wi~h the papers of this
Board.)
SET DATEB FOX PUELIQ HEARING TO CONSIDER TA/~
On motion of Dr. Nicholas, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
set the date of Nove~lber 21, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. for a public
hearing to consider tax exemption request of Winters ~ill
Propertie~, Incorporated.
95-663 10/25/95
~.B.11.b. TERJO PROPER~ESeINCORPO~3~TED
On motion o£ ~r. Nicholas, seoended by Fn~. Warren, the Board
set the dat~ oC No~emb~r 21, 1995 at 7500 ~.~. for a p~blio
he&ring =o consider ta~ s×emption rsguest o~ Terjo ~roperties,
Incorporated.
Vote: Unanimous
8.E.ll.c. IVERSON PR0~.~TIES. INCORPORAT=D
On motion of S~. Nicholas~ seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
set the date of November 21, 199~ at 7:00 p.m. fO~ a public
hearing to consider tax exemption request of Iveraun
Properties, Incorporated.
Vo~; unanimous
8.B.12. INITIATB APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIO~.L D~E TO PE~,HIT
On motion of Dr. Nicholas, ~econdad by ~r. Warren, the Board
initiated an application fo~ a Cohditi0nal Uss to per~i~ a
group care ~aoili~y a~ 1199~ Reedy Branch Ro~, Tax ~ap
1~(11 Parcel 13.
Vote: Unanimous
8.B.XS. RBOUB~T ~OR PE~HI~ION PROH PEOK IRON ~ M~T~uL
COHP~_NY~ .INC~PO~-%TED. TO UBE THE COUNTY'S P~ILRO~
on mo~ion of Dr. Nicholas, seconded by ~. Warren, th~ Boar~
Incorporated %o use the County's railroad Dressing at
~lling Creek Wast~w~t~r Trgatment ~lan, sub,eot to
CSX- (I~ ~s no~d a copy of vicinity ~ketch is filed with
~UIDE THB P~LIOLY-FIIRDED MENTAL ~ALTH/ME]~T~
"OPENATIO~AL DDNCEPTS" DEC,ELOPED ~/~D PDBLIS~D BY THE
On motion of Dr, Nicholas, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adapt~d the followin~ resolution:
ENDORSING THE "PRINCIPLES TO GUIDE THE P~qSLICLY-FUNDED
MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATiON/SUBST~CE A~U$~ S~RVICB$
SYSTE~ AND THE "OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS" DEVELOPED AND PUBLISHED
BY THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ~OARO$
wH~%%EAS, the Commonwealth o~ virginia is in thm process
o~ considering how best to redesign and improve mental heal~h,
mental retardation, and substance abuse services to citi$~ns~
and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
believes ~hat all decisions must bm guided and managed by
sound, agreed-upon principles integratinq the be~t information
and technologies available; and
WHEREAS, the Board belleve~ the= adherence to such
primciples~ and the val~e~ they reflect, is necessary to ensure
provision ef quality ~ehav~orsl health care services to target
population~ historically served with public funding; and
WHEREAS, the County of Chesterfiel~ has, for more than
two decades, demonstrated commitment and support of th=
provision of quality public services for persons with mental
disabilities both locally and across the Co~monwea!th; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby encourages the State to
maintain the current system of oversight by local citizens,
consumers, families, and elected and appointed officials, while
utilizing the best aspects uf managed cars technology during
th% redemign of t~o public behavioral health car~ system.
NOW, T~EREFORE B~ IT R~SOLVED~ that the Chesterfield
County Boar~ of Supervisors hereby jains the Chesterfield
Community ~ervic~s Doar~ in unanimously endorsing the
"~rinci~les =o Guide the ~ublicly~Funded Mental Health/Mental
Retardation/Substance Abuse Services ~yste~TM and the
"operational Conce~ts" developed and published by the ~irg~oia
As~oclation of Co--unity Services Boards.
AND, B~ IT FI/RTBER RESOLVED, that a o~py of ~his
resolution Ds forwarded to the General Assembly as a public
endorsement of guiding principlus to he utilized during
restructu3cing of the state Mental Health/Mantel
Retardation/Zubstanc~ Abuse Service$ System.
~ote; Unanimous
ORDZFAECE
Nr. Hoffmam seated he would like to recommend =~at further
amendments be made to the County's noise ordinance including
modifying the language to include any outdoor radlo~ speaker,
etc. (OF one near an open window), and not be limited only to
music coming from cars as it rela~es to luud music being heard
at a distanc~ ~reatur than 50 feet. M~ further stated he would
li~e to recommend that wording be added regarding specific
duration for the playing of outdoor radios if it is within a
certain distance from a dwellinq, such as two hours during any
~4 hour period. ~e further stated he does want ordinances
9asked that are unnecessarily intrusive or infringe upon the
rights of others, however, residents who invest in homes have
t~e riqht to enjoy peace and quiet in the privacy of their own
yard.
Mr. Warren orate4 he supported increasing the requirements of
the County's melee ordinance and clarified that Mr. Heffman's
re¢o~endation weul~ further assist in improving the ordinance.
Mr. Daniel stated he would be willing tn address the uituation
further and to possibly modify the ordinance.
regarding the ordinance he feels the ordinance should be
to allow the~ to addrems the issue further and to report back
95-665 10/25/95
Mr. Otcnage stated he ia opposed to t~e state's plan to build
a new juvenile prison at the Don Air learning Center. He
community, and goes against the County's wishee as proclalned
in a resolution adopted by the Board of Suparvlsors in May,
direct the County's utilities, safety, and legal departments to
support the efforts Of the Bon Air citizens opposing the
decision by the State to expand th~ Center.
Mr. Berber stated that the citizens of Ben Air has continued to
level and that the citizens group has hired an attorney who i~
including adopting a resolution opposinq th~ Ben Air expansion.
Mr. Otonage stated he would like the issue to be introduced to
· 0. REPORTS
On motion o~ Mr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
accepted the following reports:
Projeot~; District Reed an~ Otr~t ~ight Funds; Lease
And, furt~er~ t~e Board accepted the following roads into
State Secondary System:
ADDITIONS LEM~TH
MANOR GATD - (~ffeotive
Route
Bout~
Route
Route
3867
Route
Route
Route
]864 (Manor Gate Place) - From
$865 to 0.04 mile Southwest
3865
MF~ADOW OA]{S. SECTION A - (Effective 9-22-95%
Routs 5450 (Meadow Oaks Boulevard) - From
Route 63~ tO 0.$1 mil~ South Route
0.04 Mi
0,$1 Mi
10/~5/95
Route 5457
Route 5455
5455
Route 5456
Route S455
5455
Route 5455
Route 5450
~oute 545~
Route 5455
Route 5455
MEADOWOAKS
Route 5454
(Mmrningmist circle) - From
to 0.09 mile Southwest Route
(Morningmist court) - From
to 0.07 mile Northeast Route
(Morningmi~t Drive) - From
to 0.18 mile E=S~ Route 5450
(~oMnin~mist Plaeu) - From
to 0.~5 mile ~outheast
, SECTION
(Green oaks Court) - From Route
Route 545~ (Oregon Oak Court} - From Route
~451 to 0.03 mil~ North Rou=e 5451
Route 5451 (Oregon Oak Drive) - From Route
Route $45~ (Oregon Oak Place) - From Route
KINGSTON AVENUE, PHADE 1 - ¢~fective
~out~ 48~3 (~ogane Drive) - From 0.23 mile
existing Rout~ 618
Route 4940 (Rivure Senti Boulevard) -
to 0.13 mile Southeast Route 3075
Route 3373 (Roekfield RoadI - From Route
154~ to 0-07 ~ile Wertheast Reu~e lS45
SAL~ ESTATES, SECTION 4
~eute 33?3 (Rackfield Road) - From 0.07 mile
Route 1845
Route $$74 (~pDOD Roa~) - From Route
Route 4946 (Whirlaway Terrace) - From Route
0.09 ~i
0.07 Mi
0.1~ Mi
0.05 Mi
0.x0 Mi
0.03 Mi
0.16 ~i
0.04 ~i
0.1% Mi
0.47 ~i
0.06 Ei
0.13 ~i
0.07 Mi
0,02 Mi
0.19 Mi
0.04 Mi
~0/25/95
'~ .... ~ L II ......... L ..........LJ I. [ . !
Ro~Te A947 (Whirlaway Turn) - From Route 4901
to 0.04 mile East Route 4901
VOte: Unanimous
lz. INVOCATION
Reverend Car] Cosslett, Pa~ter
Church, gave tha inveoa~ion.
0.04 Mi
of Trinity United M~t~odist
~L~D~E OF aLLEgiaNCE TO THE FLAS OF TEE, UNITED STATES OF
Allegiance to the Plag of th~ United Stabes of America.
~4. R~OLUTIONS ]%ND SPECI;tL RECOGNITIONS
ATTainING 9.%/4K OF ~AGL~
On mu%ion of the Board, the following r~olution wa~ adopted:
WKEREAS, tha ~oy Scouts of America was inco~orate~ by
citizenship training, personal development, and £itnsss of
individuals; and
in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position
in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial tO hi~
oommunity, being active in the troop, 4emoostrating Scout
by South Minster Presbyterian Church, ha~ aooempli~hed those
high standards of oommitment and has reached the long-sOUght
goal of Eagle Scout w~ioh i~ received by less than two percent
of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; end
WI~ER~A$, growing through his experiences in
learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and pridln~
himself on th~ ~reat accomplishments of his County, Jam~s
its citizens.
Mr. Warren presented the ~xecuted resolution to Mr.
accompanied by m~bers of him family, congratulated him on
outstanding achievement, and wishes him well in his futur~
Mr. Cabiness expressed appreciation for the recognition,
XS. PUBLIC HEARINGS
15.A. TO =ONSID~ THE PROHIBITION OF T~OU~R TRUCK TP~/~rlC ON
NORTH ENON CHURCH ROAD, EAST HUNDRED ROAD (ROUTE
~y~RS SEND BOULBVI~RD, ~WD M~AROWVILLE ROAD
MS. Stith stated thiu date and time hub been advertised for a
public hearing to consider tho prohibition of through truck
traffic cn North Enon Church Read, East Hundred Road (Route
10), Rivers Bend Boulevard, and Meedewville Road.
rmcluested the Board giv~ favorabls consideration to the
request.
There being no one else to address this issue, the public
hearing wes closed.
On motion of Mr. McMale, secondmd by ~r. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
r~c~iv~d a r~qu~mt from citizens to prohibit any through truck
or truck and trailer or ~e~i-traile~ Combination except pickup
or panel truck~ from using North Enon Church Road (Route
f~o~ t~e B~O~ e~d Williamson Development (formerly The
American Tobacco Company) acesss to Me~dcw~i!le Road (Route
618); and
WHEREAS, the County'~ Eeadowvill~ ~a Plan recor~mend~
that the Virginia ~o~ar%ment of TransDortation should be
requested to ~e~t~iet through truck traffic on thi~ s~eticn of
~or%h ~non church Road; and
WHEREAS, =ha r~oommsnd~d alternate route is North Enon
Church Road, East Hundred Road (Route 10), River's Bend
Boulevard, and M~adowville Road~ and
WHeReAS, ~he Eoard has conducted a public hearing on the
prohibition.
NOW, T~EREPORE BE IT RE~OL~D~ that the
County Board of Supervisors requs~t~ the ~irginia Department of
Transportation to prohibit through truck traffic on North
Church Road.
96~ROla4
In ~ermuda ~agisterial District, WILLIAR DAVIS requested
~e~ewal of ~obile Home Permit 8~$R0216 tc park a mobile home in
a Residential (R-7) District. The density of this proposal is
approximately 3.13 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan
designates t~e Dro~erty for ~eside~tial use Of 2.51 to 4 ~nits
per acre. This property front~ the west line of Old ~lantation
Rea~, approximately 305 f~t north o~ Drewrys Eluff Road and is
better known as 7016 Old ~lontation Road. Tax ~p ~7-) (1)
Parcel 32 (Sheet 23).
Mr. Jacobso~ presented a summary of Case 96SR0124 and stated
Staff recommend~ approval of the request for seven years
subject to standard conditions. Ha notsd the mobile hone i~
located in an area designated by ~he Jefferson Davis Corridor
Plan fo~ ~esidantial use,
95-669 1~/25/95
Mr. William Davis stated the recommendation is acceptable.
There was no oppositio~present.
On motion of ~. McHalet seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
approved Case ~6~N0124 for seven (7) years suDject to the
following condition~:
1. The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the
mobile home.
2. NO lot or parce~ May be rented or leased for use as a
mobile home site, nor shall any moDile Dome De used for
rental property. Only one (1} mobile home shall be
permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel.
The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, Ee~uired front
yard, and other zcnin~ requirements o~ the applicable
zoning district shall be co~plied with, ~xcep% that no
mobile home shall be located closer than 20 ~eet to any
existing residence.
4. No additional permanent-type living space may De added
onto a mobile ~ome. All mobile homes shall De ~kirted
but shall not be placed on a permanaDt foundation.
~. where public (County) water and/or sewer ~re availmble,
they shall be used.
6. Upon being ~rant~d a Mobile ~ome Permit, the applicant
shall then obtain the necessary permits from the Office
of the Building Official. Thi~ ~hall be done prior to
the installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds
for revocation of the Mobile Hem= Per,it.
Vote
a Residential (R-7}
designates the property for residential use cf 2.51 to 4 units
central Park, Lots 40 - 43
subject to standard conditions.
located in an area designated by the J~ff~rson Davis Corridor
M~. Korea $.~ representing the applicant, stated the
approved Ca~e 9SON0135 far seven (7~ ~ear~ s~lbject :o the
following condition~:
1. The applicant ghall be th~ o~n~r and occupant of the
mobile home.
Vo~e~
No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for u~e az a
mobile home site, nor s~all any mobile homo be used
rental property. Only one (1) mobile home shall be
permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel.
The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front
yard, and ot~e~ zoning requirements of the applicable
zoning district shall be complied wi=h, except that no
mobile home shall b~ located closer %hen 20 feet to any
No additional m~r~anent-type living ~pace ~ay be added
onto a mobile home. Ail mobii~ hom~$ shall be ~kirt~d
~ut shall not be pta~ed on a permanent foundation.
Wher~ publi~ (county) water and/er sewer are available,
they shall be used.
Upon being gr~nted a Mobile ~ome Permit, ~he applicant
shall then obtain the necessary perm~t~ fro~ tko office
of the Building Official. Thi~ ~h~li b~ done ~rior to
T_he installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds
968R0136
In Bermuda ~agisterial Di~t~ict, B~U~R~ B. ~3d~LI~
renewal of Mobile Homo Permi~ 88SRO231 to park a mobile home in
a Residential (R-7) District. The density of this proposal
approximately 0.72 uni:~ Der aero. The Comprehensive Plan
desiqnates th~ p~ope~ty for residential us~ of 2-51 to 4 units
per acre. This proDer~y fronts the west line of Meridian
A¥~mu~, ~t C~nter Street and is better know~ as 15~12 M~ridian
gve~e. Tax ~ 149-13 (~} Ivey Tract, Block 5, Lot 13 (Sheet
Mr. Jacobsen presented a summary of da~e ~$~Ol~ and
staff recommends approval of the request for ~ev=n years
subject to standard condition~ ~ith modification of Condition
Nu~3oer 1 to road tho applicant's sister shall be the owner of
the mobile home." ~e noted the mobile home is located in an
area de~ign~e~ by %he Southern and Western Area Plan for
residential use and that one le~er was r~ceived in opposition
to the request.
MS. Linde Lewis~ ~ep~ementing the applicant, stated the
recommendation is acceptable. There was no opposition present.
On mc%ion c~ Mr. M=Hale, seconded by Dr. Nichelas~ the Boa~d
approved ca~e 96SN0135 for seven (7} years subjec~ to the
followlng conditions:
1. T~e apDlioant's sister shall be the owner of the mobile
home. The mobilm home shall be occupied by the
applicant's sister, Agnes comer and her immediate family
only.
Mo lot or parcel may be rented or leased for use am
mc~ile home site, nor mhall any mobile home be used for
rental property. Only one (1) mobile home ~hall be
per~itted to be ~Rrked on an individual lot or parcel.
95-~71 10/2S/9~
Vote:
The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front
yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable
zoning distric= shall be complied with, except that no
mobile home shall be located closer tha~ 20 feet to any
existing residence.
No additional permanent-type living space may be added
once a mobile home. Ail mobile home~ shall bs skirted
but ~hatl not be placed on a permanent foundation.
Where public (County} water and/or sewer ute available,
%hey shall be used-
Upon being ~anted a Kobile ~one Permit, the applicant
shall then obtain the necessary permits from ~he Office
of the ~uilding Official. This shall be done prior to
the installation or relocation of ~he mobile home.
Any violation of the a~ove conditions shall be grounds
for revocation of the ~obile ~cm~ P~rmit.
I~ oal~ ~ag~terial District, KENNETH WAYNE O~ERA~E rsqueste~
renewal of Mobile Home Permit ~s~023~ to park a mobile home in
a Kemidantial (R-7) District. The density Of this proposal is
approximately 1.16 unite per a~re. The Comprehensive
designates the property for residential u~e of 1.51 to 4 units
per acre. Thi~ property fronts the west line of Hill Road,
approximately 1,600 £~et southwest of Canasta Drive and is
better known as 6714 Hill Road. T~ ~ap 65-8 (2)
Gardens, Section ~, Lot 67 (Sheet 22).
Mr. Jacobsen presented a summary of Case 966R0137 and stated
subject to standard conditions. He note~ th~ mobile home is
located in an area designated by the Central Area Land Use and
Transpu~b.~t~cn Plan for residential u~e.
Mr. Kenneth Overacts sba%ed ~he recommendation is acceptable.
Ther~ was no opposition present.
On motion of Nr. Daniel, ~econded by D~. Nioholas~ the Board
approved Case 966NQ137 ~sr seven [?) years subject to the
following conditions:
1- The applicant shall be the owner and o~eupant of
mobile ho~e.
No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for us~ as a
mobile home site, nor shall any mobile he~e be used for
rental property. Only one (1) mobile home shall be
permitted to be parred on an individual let Or parcel.
Th~ minimum lot size~ yard setbacks, required fron~
yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable
zoning district shall be complied with~ except that
existing residence.
4. Re additional ps--anent-type living space may be added
but shall not be placed on a permament foundation.
~ere p~lic (County) water and/or sewer are available,
Upon being granted a Mobile Ho~e Permit~ the applicant
shall then obtain the necessary permits from the Office
of the Building official. This ~all be done prior to
~he installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any violation of the above condition~ shall bo gEounds
for revocation of the Nobile Home Permit.
renewal of Mobile ~ome Permit $$SR0229 to park a mobile home in
a Residential (R-7) District, The density Of this proposal is
approximately 6.67 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan
designates the property for residential use of 2.51 to 4 units
per acre. This property fronts the wast linc of Senate Street,
applicant has requested th~ Condition ~umber 2 be amended to
allow the applicant to rent the ~obile home, however, staff
feels this amendment doe~ not meet khe ~pirit and intent of the
amendment to Condition 2, however, recemmend~ npproval cf the
al%owed to p~y rent for the u~e of the lot. Ther~ was no
opposition present.
recommended by staff, would allow Mr. ~ayn~ tc reside in the
mobile home mhd continue to rent the property.
not allow Mr. ~ayme tc resid~ in the mobile home and continue
amended to allow this and expressed concerns about changing the
Stundurd Condition.
Mr. Payne stated he is currently negotiating with the owner of
%he io% in an attempt to buy the lot. When asked, he stated ha
Om motion of Mr- NcHale, seconded by Dr~ Nicholas, the Board
a Residential (R-7) District. The density of this proposal i~
designates the property for remidential ume of 2.51 to & units
per acre. This property fronts the southwest line of Beaumont
Beaumont Avenue. Tax Map 81-16 (5} Central Park, Block 7, Lots
10,through ~l (Short 23).
Mr. Jaoobson presented a summary of Case 9~R0144 and stated
skaff recommends approval of the request for save~ years
subject to standard conditions. He noted the mobile home is
located ih an area designated by the Jefferson Davi~ Corrider
Plan for residential uss.
Ms. Patricia A. Jordan stated the recemmen~atisn is acceptable.
There was no oD~osltien present.
On motion of Mr. ~oHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Beard
following conditions:
1. The applicant ~hatl be the owner and occupant of the
mobile home.
No lot or parcel may be ranted or leased for
msbile home site, ncr shall any Dobile home be used for
rental property. Only one (1) mobile ~ome ~hall be
permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel.
5. The minimu~ lot size, yard setbacks, r~qulred front
yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable
zoning district shall be ~mplied with, except that no
mobile home shall be tecut=d closer than ~8 feet to any
existing re~idenoe.
4. No additional permanent-type living space may be added
en%o a mobile home. All mobile hom=s s~all be skirted
~ut shall not be Dlaoe~ on a permanent foundation-
5. Where public [County) wa~er and]or sewer are available,
~hsy shall ~e used.
Upon being granted a Mobile Home Pe~if, the applicant
shall then obtsin t~e necessary permits from the Office
of th~ Building Official- This shall be dens prior to
the installation or relocation of ~ke mobile home.
Any violation of the above conditions ehu!l
£ur revocation of the ~obil~ ~om~ Permit.
Mobile Home Permit to park a mobile home in a Residential (R-V)
District. The density of this proposal i~ approximately ~.17
unit~ per acre. The Cemprehensive Plan ~esigna~e~ ~h~ property
property fronts the south lin~ of ~hields Rca4, at Oak Road and
is better known a~ 2619 ~h~elds Road. Tax Nsp 98-14 (4)
Shields Property, Block A, Lo~ 7
subject to standard conditions. He further stated the
applicant i~ requesting that standard Condition Number
amended to allow him to rent the mobile home. He mtated ~taff
feels this type of smendment does not meet the spiri= an~
located in an area designated by the Chester village Plan for
residential
95-674 10/25/95
He further ~tated when he purchased the property it was his
~ntenn to rent the property, however, he now has no intentions
of renting the mobile home. There was no opposition
On motion of ~i]T. McHsle, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the
approved Case 96SN0133 for seven (7) years mubject to the
following conditions:
T~e applicant shall be thc owner and occupant cf tho
mobile home o~te, nor shall any mobile home be used for
~e~tal p~ep~ty. Only one (1) mobile home ~hall be
permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel.
The minimum lo~ size~ yard setbaok~, required front
yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable
zoning ~istriet shall bo ccm~iisd with, except that ne
mobile home ~hall be located closer than 20 f~t to any
existing
4. No additional permanent-type living apace ~ay be added
but shall not be placed on a permanent foundation.
5 Where p~blio (county) wate~ and/o~ szWur are available,
6 Upon being granted a Mobile Home Permi=, th~ applicant
of the Building Offiuial. Thi~ ~hall be done Drier
th~ installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds
for revocation of the Mobile Home Permit.
7
V st.o:
In Clover ~ill Magisterial District, SOUT~ATE ASSOCIATE~
requested rezoning from Residential (R-7) to Corporate Office
(0-2) of 0.9 acre~, plus amendment to Conditional U~e ~lann~d
Developments [ca~eo 865035 and ~95N9199~ ~o allow reduction in
parking space sizes and modification of appreved building
(Arboretum). The density of such amendment will be controlled
Plan designate~ the property for office use and for residential
Residential (R-?) and CorDorsta offis~ (0-2) Districts on twa
(~) parcels totaling 50.9 acre~, th~ first Dactyl fronting
approximately 100 feet on the south 1ins of ~idlo~hian Turnpike
and =he second parsel fren%ing approximately 570 feet on t~e
the ~lanning Coi~mi~ion and ~taff recommend~ approval and
a~eptance of proffered conditions. He noted the 'request
oenfc~s to the Worthern Area land Use and Transportation Plan.
~r. Leon Sha~owen, representing the applicant, stated the
recommendation is Acceptable.
95-575 10/25/95
approved Case 96SND108 subject to the following condition:
~O~DITION m ,~QR THAT PORTION OF PROPERTY ZONED 0-2 WITH
CONDITIONAL USE PLARHED DEVELOPMENT
Building B and D as depicted on the plan preparod by Roy
Ashley Associates, Inc., submitted to Phs Planning
Department on February t0, i9~9, may be ineroased to
maximum of ?8,000 gross ~g~are feet and 52,000 gross
(NOTES: a) With the approval of this request,
Condition 1 of Ca~e 89SN0199 is modified
to a~end ~he square footage limitations
depicted on the approved Master Plan for
Buildings ~ and D.
b) With the approval eI P~is request,
Condition 1 of Case 86S0~5 is deleted.
c) All other conditions of zoning approval
fn~ Ca,as 86S035 and 89HN0199 remain i~
property subject to these Conditional Usa
planned Developments-)
And, further, the ~oa~d accepted the following proffered
conditions:
~ROFFERED CONDITION~ - FOR THAT PORTION OF PROPERTY
WITHOUT CONDITIONAL USE PLANNED DEVE~OPMEN~ ~UDOT RIVET O~
1. Uses shall be restricted to parking for office use.
2. The owner/developer shall not raques~ rsductlon 0£ the
required fifty (50) foot buffer thrOUq~ site plan
review,
3. Provided the Board of Zoning Appeals grants a variance
to the required number of parking spaces
96AN0110)~ the property shall not be developed for
fifteen (15) years from the dat~ of approval of this
request. Drainage and erosion control improvemente
required Dy Environmental Engineering shall, however, be
permitted upon approval of suc~ plans by the Plarnling
Department and Environmental $ngineering. The plans for
any much drainage Or e~osion control improvements shall
minimize the removal of trees,
4. Parking lot lighting shall not exceed a height of eight
(8) feet above grade.
5- 8~tween the w~tern property boundary and any drainage
er parking lot improvements located east of the required
fifty {50) foot buffer, a double row of Eastern Red
cedars, having an initial height of at least four (4)
feet and staggered fifteen (15) feet on center, ~hall be
installed and maintained. Such tree planting shall
on t~e West side (seottingham subdivision side) of any
proposed permanent storm sewer easement, guch plantlngs
shall be located outside the bott~dary of any permanent
s=orm sewer easement, such tree plaDting shall
located mo as to minimine t~e removal of
vega=atica located within the required fifty ($0) foot
buffer. A landscaping plan depicting this requirement
shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review
and approval prior to any land disturbance er drainage
improvements on the subject property er any development
om Parcel 2S on Tax Map 28-1(1). This landscaping shall
95-676 i0/25/95
be accomplished in conjunction with any land disturbance
or drainage improvements on the ~ubject property or any
development on Parcel 2S, Tax Map 28-1(1) provided,
however, that thi~ landscaping shall be installed at a
time that will optimize the ~urvival and healthy growth
of the plants, as determined by the Planning Department.
(NOTES: A. Clearing of existing vegetation within the
required fifty (50) foot buffer, if
must he approved by the Planning
Department.
B. This condition wo~ld not require initial
installation of the plant materials in
aCCordance with Zoning 0rdinence
requirements for fifty (~o) foot buffers.
Rather the Ordinance r~qu~re~ents, where
t~ese exceed er ars in addition to those
of the approved landscaping plan, must be
met at the time u£ construction of any
parking facilities on the subject
p~sperty.)
6. Prlur to site plan approval for eny par~ing
improvements, the Planning Commission shall determine if
landscapln~ ~etween Scottingham Subdivision! Section D,
Block E and tho plannud parking lot improvements is
adequate to screen such improvements from adjacent
residences. If the Planning Commission determines that
landscaping is not adequate to provide
screening wall or otham so,coning devices shall be
p~ovided a~ determined by the Planning Commission. The
materiels, height, design and location o~ thi~ wall or
~lanning Co~ission prior to site plan approval for such
parking lot improvements. The Wall ~ oth=r screening
devices shall be installed in conjunction with the
parking lot improvements.
SUBJECT OF TaIS R~OU=$T
1. In conjunction with any ~urther development, one of the
following shall be met:
a. The downstream channel adjacent to Scottingham
Subdivision, Section D, 5lock E shell be
improved where directed by ~nviro~ental
Engineering with a non-~rc~able lining capable
of conveying a po~t d~valopment ten [10) year
b. Th~ development shall be designed to drain away
from the downstream channel adjacent
$cottingham Subdivision, Section D, Block E to
an adequate watercourse as determine~ Dy
Environmental Engineering
2. At least twenty-one I21) days prior to the Planning
z0~ing amendment on a~y portion of the property south of
~_rbcretum Parkway, t~e aDDliean~ s~all noti£y the
known president of the Scottingham civic Association
such ~eguest and sub~it pruu£ cf notification to the
Planning Department prior to the public hearing.
95-677 10/25/95
1(1), Condition 5 which applies tu the VDOT Droper~y
which i~ ths subject of ~his request shall be complied
with.
17. ~DJOURNMENT
On motion of ~Lr. Barber, s~conded by Mr. Mc~ale, the ~oa~d
adjourne4 st ~:$0 p.m. untll November 8, 19~ a% ~:00 p.m.
Vote: Unanimous