The URL can be used to link to this page

12-13-1995 Minutes~INUTE~ Mr. J. L. McHaler Ill, Chairman Nr. Arthur $. Warren, Vice Chrm, Hr. Edward B. Barber Mr. Marry G. Daniel Dr. Freddie W. Nicholaz, S~. Mr. Lune B. Rumsey County Administrator County Airport Utilities A~st. to County Admin ~s, Faith L. Davis, Mrs. Doris R. DeHart, In~ergov~rn. Affairs Parks mnd Recreation Deputy CO, Admin., Management ~e~vioes County Ombudsman Dir., Planning Human Services Mr. Richard M. MeElfish, Dir., Env. Engineering County Attorney Dir., ~ealth Publi~ Affairs Police Department Dir., ~udget & Management Deputy Co. Admin., Dr. ~ober~ Wagenknecht~ Mr. McHale called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at ~:~0 p.m. 55-749 on motion o~ Dr. Nicholas, ~e~onde~ by ~r. Warren, the Board approved the minutes of November 21, 1995, as submitted. Vote; Una~imo~ t~e county's financial statements for Fiscal Year I99~. ~unn ~tated the report has been presented to the County's Budget and Audit Committee and was prepared by the county's Accounting D~partm~nt. ~e further stated within the financial individual and combining statements~ general gronp accounts, and component uni~ statements- He stated Coopers and Lybrand's opinion i~ an unqualified opinion that states the finanmial .,~tatements present fairly in all material respects of the lather un~fualified opinions are inoluded in th~ r~port which ~indiceted no material findings. He further stated coopers and Lybrand feel this report, which received the Government Finance officers Association (GFOA} Award in 1994, will receive t~e ~r. Daniel stated the Budga~ and Audit Committee mat and reflects the ~uality of employees, management ~trength, and management practices at Chesterfield County, Mr. McEale expressed appreciation to the Accounting and Internal Audit staff for their efforts throughout the year in making this report po~Eible. chief Pittman introduced officer Cortney Merkel who was outstanding service with the County's Pulice Department. 14r. MoHale pre~nted a framed picture of 0ffio~r Merkel on the cover of Parade Magazine. ~, EOA~D COMMITTEE REPORTS There were no ~oard Committee Reports at this time. 4. REOUBST8 TO POSTPONE ~CTION. ~MER~ENCY ~DDITIONB. OR ~HAN~EB IN T~E OEDE~ OF P~E~E~TATION On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board added Item 8.C.19., Appropriation of Matoacu Diutrict Three Cent Road Funds to t~e ~la¢~History ~onr~Cemmittee to Provide Additional F~dlng for Black ~istor~ Mon~ Activities; added Item 8.C.20., Appropriation and Transfer of Funds for Prel~ina~ ~gineering for Read Improv~ants for the I- Drlvpr~ A~uciation, Inoorporated; re, laced Item 11., Executive Session P~suant to Section ~.1-344A.1., Code of virqinia, 1950, a~ ~ended, Relatin~ to the Perfo~ance of a S~ecific Appoint66 of the Board~ to Include an Additional Executiv~ Session Pursuant to Sections Z.l-344A.~. mhd 2.1-344A.3. for Disoussion of the Location of a P~ospective Business in the 95-750 County Where ~o Previous Announcement sas seen Ha~e of the Businesm' Intereet in Locating in Chesterfield Ceunty and 2) Dissection Qf the Acquisition or Use of Reel PreDerty for ~ Public Purpose; and replaced Item 7., Con~ideratlen of Amending the Countyts Noise Ordinance Regarding l) Early Mernin~ Trash Pick-up, 2) Outdoor Nuelc~ and 3) Car Sterios, and, adopted the agenda, as amended. HOSPITAL FOR THEIR DONATION TO C~{E~TERFIELB ~BALTH DEPARTMENT Mr. Nelson introduced MS. Harilyn Tavenner, Chief E×~cutive Officer at Chippenham Medical Center/Johnston-Willis who was present to ~eceive the r~solution. On motion of the Beard, the following reselution wa~ adopted: WHEREAS, Jehn~to~-Willis ~espital ie a major medical facility in Chesterfield county providing uenvenient, quality, comprehensive health care to the residents of Chesterfield County since June, 19~0; and W~EREAS, Dhy~i~an~ accessing Johnston-willis Hospital ere highly dedicated to en~urinq that patients with aliments, the most minor to the most challenging, ute supported to the desired outcome; and W~{EREA$, Johnston-Willis ~ospital is a leader in community health affeire and has comeistentty worked to improve the h~alth of the public; and W~EP~EA$, the Beard of Directors of JohnEton-Willis Hospital ha$ executed a monetary donation, in the amount of $ib0,0~O, on behalf o~ the aospi~al to ~he Cheszer~i~ld County Health Depar~ment~ and ~E~AS, the Mealt~ Depar~ent utilized ~i~ donation to support primary h~alth care =ervices, including both sick an~ well child care~ for those children enrolled at th~ ~eibel Children's ~ealth Care Center located a~ ~o~l~y ~lementa~ Children's ~ealth Care Center with the p~ovi~ion of p~dia~rio =wenty-~our heur medical care for %his population. aDDreoiation to th~ Board of Directors of Johnston-Willis Hospital for their generou~ coDtribu%ions to the health well-being of the children and families of t~e Bensley community ~n~ a=knowl~ge~ ~he good fortune of the County to and e~ressed aD~reoiation to Johns=on-willis Hospi=at tha~ will be used to supDort primary ~ealt~ oare s~rvi~es ~or MS, Tavenner expressed appreciation for the recognition. 95-751 12/1~/95 PUBLI~ BIBI~d~UPDN WE~ RE~RE~ENT Fir. Wagenkn~cht introdUCed ~. A~ne R. ~i~a, who was pre~nt to r~iv~ th~ r~solution. On mo%ion ~ th~ Hoar~ %h~ following ~esolution was adopted: ~EREAS, Mrs. ~ne R. ~te joine~ the Ck~s~field County public Library in I968 as one of ~he first two County until th~ last bookmobila rolled to a stop in I~81; a~ ~EREAS, Mrs. ~ite joined th~ C~ntral ~ibra~ Reference Department in 1981 and began Drovidin~ excellent service, handling inter-librmry loans, supervising pages, and indexing nawspapers; and ~EREAS~ Mrs. White e~tablished th~ Che~terfiel~ Syst~'~ Local ~i~tory Collection ~hich is now an invaluable ~EA$, Mrs. ~ite, with the financial assistanc~ of the iColluctiun, the Intern=tiOnUl Genealogical Index; military ~oo~d~; an~ t~e Social Securi=y Dea=h Index and Family ~arch, thereby~ mukin~ uvuilubl= to local residents 0~e of the ~ost ~ER~S, Mrs. ~it~ ha~ ~killf~lly and diligently vi=ired ~e Library from all o~er the United States; and WH~R~S, Mrs. White ha~ served ms Acting Bran=h of =he central Library and was ~he Library's first nominee for Chesterfield County ~ployee of the Year in 197S and was nomina=ed in 1995. NOW, TH~FORE BE IT ~SOLVED~ =hat the County Board of Supervisors p~licly recognizes Mrs. Anne R. ~ite and extends thair appreciation for ovar y~ar$ of ~e4ica~d ~rvice to the County add their bent for a long and happy retir~m~t. resolution De presented to~s. ~i=e and =ha= =his re~olution b= pe~unently record=~ amonq the papers Of thi~ Boa~ Supervisors of ~esterfield ¢oun=y, Virginia. Vote: Unanimous and w~shmd her well in her re~rmment. ~s. W~i~e e~ressed appreciation for ~e reoo~ition and stated uhm ham enjoyed her service with ~= County. REPORT OW NEI~HBOP~HOOD PRESERVATION IN CHESTERFIELD Mr. Eenn~th F. Hardt, Chairman o~ the Committee on the Future, ~tated the Chesterfield County Committee on the F~tur~ was authorized by the 1~$7 County Charter and ie ch~e~ with forecasting leng-~an~e ~ondition~ that may affect the County 95-752 12/13/95 into the 21st Century in making recommendations to the Soard Superviscr~. He pre~ented an overview on Neighborhood ~r~erv~tion in Chesterfield County including the role of community organlza~ions, improvement of County neighborhoods, ~nd conditions cf neighborhood schools. He stated the Commlttee'~ reco~endations include recognizing neighborhood organizations ae official representativm~ of their respective neighborhoods and involve them in decisions concerning improvements which can and should be made in their neighborhoods and emphasizing the improve~ent of existing older schools as a priority over new school constru=tlon in bend referenda. He then reviewed objectives and strategies of addressing co--unity safety and crime prevention amd ~tated re¢ommend~tionu include evaluating the cost and potential academic impact of starting and ending secondary school days at a later time and providing neighborhood and business associations information oonoerning crimes committed within a co~uuunity. Ka then reviewed maintenance, rehabilitation, and design of public and private facilities and stated r~comm~ndations include r~habilitating ol~e~ homes and o~ercial establishments; providing flexible developing regulatlon~ ~uch as overlay zone districts which will allow exceptions to c~rtain requirements where appropriate; enuouraging a sense of co.unity in =~e demi~ of nmw and and narrowing cE streets in residential ar~am. He then development strategi~ plan; developing neighborhood developing strategic plan for workforce training needs; initiating small buslne~ a~i~tance; and the d~v~lopinq community ¢ent~r~. She noted three implementation r~oo~endations are actively being pursued by County departments. ~. ~ardt st~t~ the ~ommitte~ is pleased wi~h t~e status opportunity to serve on the committ~ and ~tated na ~a~ enjoyed se~in~ on the Co~ittee. ~r. William she~ake, a member o~ the cedi%tee on ~he Fu~ure~ stated he hms alms enjoyed ~erving on the Committee and areas in ~he County. ~. ~ardt ~tated the School System is an important and vital will be made to the Co~i~ee to present a report to the school ~, MoHale ~xpr~d appreuiation to the co~itt~e for their Retreat would be a prope~ time for the Committee on the to meet again wi~ Board regarding the report, 95-753 12/13/95 Mr. Barber requeste~ staff to report back to the Board on the cost analysis of i~plementing the committee's Neighborhood Preserve=ion recomm~n~at£0na at the Retreat. Mr. Hai~mer introduced Mr. Richard L. Young, Chalrl~an cf the Metropolitan Richmond Convention and Visitors Bureau (MRC&VB), presented an update to the Board regarding the Richmond Centre Regional Project. 1~. Young expressed appreciation to ~he Board for opportunity to serve on the I~RC&VB and for. the support of the Board of Supe~vis0~s. He emphasized the ~portance of travel and tourism to the co,unity and the need to build a convention center and stated business is being lost due t0 t~e la~ of e~an~ion, aa th~n in~ruduua~ Sr. Jehu ~. Berry, Presiden~ and Chief Operating Officer of~C&VB who pra~nted an overview of proposed Project and the return on investment; breakdown fun~ing requiremen=~ hotel c~upancy tax ~upport ~rom local organizations; State participation; and reasons for expanding Project and the efforts to obtain Stat~ financial support ~roug~ %he General Assembly in ~he near ~uture. m~ers of the General Assembly on several issues regarding the Project, ~peclflaally as it relates to the in~reaa~ in th~ the ~C&VB to move forward on the Project. He stated the ~C&V~ ~hould ~oon be made aware of Governor George Allen's position regarding the tax increase. Mr. Warren stated he feels the hotel occupancy tax increase is critical in the ~rucess and that he agrees with the position of H~rico Co~ty ~at everyone~ including ~a Delegation Pro~ect in o~de~ to make it work. He f~rther ~tated he fe~l~ D~legatas, State Senators, and Governors ne~d to t~e the lead in ~e region in supporting this proposed Project. Mr. Daniel stated the ~CaVB needs to brinq fo~nrd extremely important to obtain the total cost of the Project; support the Project other than the hotel occupancy tax. He inquire~ am =o wh~er ~he marginal amount o! money, localities r~ceive from th~ occupancy tax, will go directly to a funding package including State and local funds for project which take into accoun= =he ClOy of Ric~ond~m Stat~ ~. Young stated total cons~uction cost is currently estimated at $70.$ million an~ ~ha=~ ~iohmond tn=~national Airpor= vital to th~ expansion of the Co~ve~tio~ Centre bec~se of air s~rvice. Hu further mta~ed lan~uge is not ~lann~d to ~itten into ~ pelage that specifically targets the f~ds of th~ loculitle~ to the C~nven=ion Centre. There was brief discussion r~la~ive to lan~ua~ bein~ in refolution that supports imposing and increasing the occupancy tax increase. 95-754 12/13/95 Of adopting the resolution supporting the e~ansion to allow Governor Allen to addres~ the issue cf the he%el occupancy tax increase. Mr. MeHale then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Barber~ for the Board to defer ¢on~id~ratien of adoption of a sup~crtlnq the ~xpansion of the Richmond Centre and the efforts to obtain Stats financial support through the seneral Assembly until January 3, 1996. Th%re was b~ia£ discussion relative to wh~ther pa~$ing or deferring the resolution would enhance the MRC&VB State fundin~ request. Mr. Daniel ~tated he supports ~he deferral and if specific issues are not addressed by the Board meeting of January 1996, the Board will defer the issue until its January 24, 1996 ~eeti~g. Mr. ~cHale called for the vote an the motion made by him, seconded byMr. ~arber, far the Beard to defer consideration of adoption of a resolution supporting the expanmicn of the ~iohmond Centre and the efforts tu ob~im state financial ~uppo~t through the General A~embly until January 3, 1996. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Ramsay in=~cduoed Mr. McCraoken who presented an overview of financing of highway construction in the County including ratio of allocation to revenue sharembycenst~ction district; and interstate Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) by construction district; ~990 Richmond district population by locality; 1993 Richmond district primary and in~erstats VMT; end Riok~ond district construction funds by local from ~W96-EYMO01. ~e then reviewed ce~strReti0n f~nd~ versus population fro~ FY96-FY2001; Chesterfield County'~ share oX virginia Department of Tran=portation ~iseretionary funding f~om FY96 through FYIO0~; and Richmond dimtrict maintsnan¢~ allocations for FY96. Biseuseion, comments, and questions ensued r=latlve to Che~te~field's population versus actual construction allocations ~o Chesterfield; how the ata~e determines the amount of discretlonar~ funding allocated to localitles; concerns ~hat Chesterfield is no~ :eceiving its fair share of alloceticns; and making the State aware t~at the system should be changed to ensure chesterfield ~ets its fair s~ar6 Of allocations. Mr. McC~acke~ then ~eviawed ~rimary construction funds by leo~lity fram FY96-FY2001; Route 288 allocations from FY95- F¥2000 Yarsus FY96-EY~001; Powhite toll plaza origins and destinations; revenue estimates for FY95~ revenue distribution for FY95; and major ~tate tr~nsper~aticn facilities end cost. Mr. Ramsay stated he and Mr. McCracken met with Chesterfie~ representative on the Commonwealth Transpertation Board end r~vlewed the flgure~ that hav~ be~n prenanted. 9s-~55 12/13/9~ 0 CONSIDERATION OF AMB~DI~G THE COUNTYIS ~OI~~. ORDINANCE RE~RDIN~ E~RLY KORNIN~ TRASH ~ICK-UB ~ND, CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE TO REGULATE ~ OUTDOOR MUSIC A~D (B) CAR ~DIOS M~. Lisa Dewey, Asslstan~ County Attorney, ~tated on ~ovcmb=r 8, 1995, the Board of Supervi~or~ deferred the consideration of amend/~ente to the County's noise ardinance regulating 1) early morning trash pick-up, 2) outdoor music, and 3) car radios until December i3, 1~95. She further state~ that on 0=tobit 11, 1995 the Board held a public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to the aoise ordinan=~ to prohibit tramh pick-up prior to 7:00 a.m. She stated based sm the comments ~de at ~ha~ public hearing, ~e Board ~f~r~ a~io~ on th~ i~ue to allow ~taff to revi~e ~e a~e~dment to prohibit waste pick-up prior to 5:00 a.m. in residential areas only and to obtain co~ents from the trash-hauling industry, She f~ther ~tated staff ~ent th~ r~visg~ ordinance prohibiting waste pick-up prior to ~:00 a.m. to all of the trash hauler~ licensed in the County and to members of the solid Waste Advisory Co~ittee for . co~ent and staff received culprits from ~ome of the ~racipient~, all of whom ind~cm%e~ ~h~ir agr~amen~ with the ;proposed lan~age. She stated that this amendment could be adopted by the Board without holdin~ ano~er 9ublic hearing. She f~rth~r ~tated on October ~5~ 19~5, a citizen addressed th~ Board and requested an addltionat amsn~ent to ~e noise ordinanc~ to prohibit the playing of any outdoor music ~hioh can be heard at a distance grater than fifty ~eet and an ~e~e~t to li~it the length of time music can be played outside to two hcur~ in any twenty-~our hou~ period, s~e stated staff feels these proposed ~mendm~nts relating to bu~n~ enqag~ng in legitimate activities who are not disturbing anyone~ however, s~aff has revised the noise Board wishes to consider this ~an~ent it ~u~t ~et a p~blio Soard reconsider the portion of the nois= ordinance add,ted on october ~1, ~, which prohibits citizens from oDera~in~ =ar radios which can be heard at a distance of fifty fe~t or mcr= in ordmr to ex~Dt ~ublic safety vehiul~s a~d motor vehicle alarms. ~he stated if the Board desires to adopt uny of the chanues re~ula~inu outdoor music and oar radios, a public hea~ing would be ~equir~d. trash Did-up was sent ~o ~or~y-~hrsm trash hauler indu~trie~ licensed in ~ County. Ku further stated fiftee~ ~eciDient~ resDondsd to snarl re~arding ~he ordlnancm, all of whom indicated ~eir agre~=nt with the proposed la~age of prohibiting wastm pick-up prior to 5:00 a.m. held regarding ~arly morning trash pickup, he feels un hauling industry is comfortable with the proposed changes. ~. Warren then mmde a motion, s~conded by ~. Daniel, for the Board %o s~t the ~a~e of January 24, 1996 ~or a D~lic hearln~ to consider ~ending the County's noise ordinance re~lating ~) early mornln~ trash pi~-uD, 2) outdoor music, and 3) cur M~. Ba~b~ state~ h~ has no problem with ~cheduling another 9ubllc hearln~ regulating ~arly morning ~rash pi~-u~ ~o be ~o~side~ed along with regulating outdoor music and car radio~. 95-756 12/13/95 Hr. ~cHsle stabet he supports holding a public hearing cn all Hr. McHale called for the vote on the motion made by ~r. Warren, ~econd~d by Mr. Danieli for the Bea~d to set the date of January 24, ~996 at 7:00 p.m. for a publi~ bearing to consider amending the C0unty~s noise ordinance regulating 1) early morning trash pick-up, 2) outdoor music an~ 3) car radios. 8.. N~W BUSINESS 8.A. STREETLIGHT IN~TAL~ATIO~ COST APPROFALS O~ ~o~io~ of Dr. ~iohola~ seconded Dy M~. ~cHale, the Board approved the following streetlight installation cost approvals: ~.LE_.~ISTRICT ~outtumoor~ Road, vi~inlty between 4920 an~ 4940 cost to ~nstall light: D~e to health, ~afety, and welfare concerns ~TOACA DISTRICT Halloway AVe~e, vicinity of l~00, on the existing pole No ~ost to install light. ~ Church Ro~d Looation~: church Road, vicinity of 2O4~1, on the existing pole Ch~eh Road, vicinity of ~0509, on the existing pole ChuF~h Road, vicinity of 20601; o~ the existing pole Church Road, vicinity of 20621, on the existing pole Contingency fund%rig for inst~11ation of all four $~r~tlights : $1,000.00 This streetlight r~que$~ is presented without a cost ~r~e~ligh% installations utilizing existing poles rarely have any installation co~t$ a~moclated with th~. I~ r~q~e~ted t~at if ~he Board approves this st~eetlig~t request that it also appropriate $1,~00.QO from the Mtreetliqht ~nd as a oo~tin~ency. Any funds not used in completing this project will be raturned tu kha M~%caca Streutlight * Happy Hill Road Location~: Mappy Kill Road~ vioinity between 15901 and 16901, on the eximting pole Happy ~ill Road, vicinity between ~6001 and 16~1, on the existing Dole Happy Kill Road, vicinity between t60~1 and 1603~, on the ~mppy Mill Rend, vic&n~ty 1~0~, on the existing pole Happy Hill Road, vicinity between 16042 and 16056, on the existing pole (It is noted this utreetlight request is premented wi~out streetlight installatiens utilizing existinq poles rarely have any installation costs a~eeciated with them. It is reql/ested that if the Boar~ approves this streetlight iequest that it also appropriate $1,000.00 fre~ the Matoaca Straetlight Fund as a contingency. Any funds not used in completing this project will be returned to the ~atoacu Streetlight Fund.) Vote: Unanimous Dr. Nic~ol&s stated he raceivsd a letter from the Advisor of the Drug and Alcohol Abus~ Task Force indicating that the Task Force has nc ~epresentation by African A~erioans. He further ~tat~d mince a lot of the critical discussion dealing wit~dLt~/g and alcohol abuse sffemted the African American Co~munity, h~ was requested to expedite the procedure for identifying at least two people who could af~act~valy work with the Task Dr. Nicholas then made a motion, seconded by /~r. Warren, fo~ the Bourd to suspend its ~ules at this time tO allow ./Drug and Alcohol Abuse Task Force. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Dr. Nicholas, sacundod by ~r, Warren, the Doard simultaneously nominated/appointedMr. Samuel O. Smith and Mr. RoDert L. Birdsong, Sr. to serve on the Drug and ~lcoholAbu~e Task Force whose terms are at the pleasure of the Board. On motion of Mr. Mc~qale, seconded by ]~r. Daniel, the Board Bove~ Item ~.A., ~ecutlve Session Pursuant to Section ~.I- 3&~A.I.~ Cede of V~rglnla, 1950, as A~ende~, Relating ~o the Perform~n~ of ~ Specific Appolnte~ of the Board and It~ ~,B., E~acutive Pursuant to Sections 2.1-344A.5. an~ 2.1- ~44A.3. fur 1) D£$c~ssion of th~ 5ocation of a Prospective Business in the County Where No Previous Annonnoemen~ ha~ Been ~ade Of th~ Business' Interest in Locating in Cheste~£ield County and 2) Discussion of the Acquisition or US~ of Real Frcperty ~or ~ ~ublic ~urpose to follow Item 8.B., Appointments. Vote: Unanimous ll.B. EXECUTIVE SESSXO~ PURSU~/~T TO ~EeTION 2o~-)44A.5. ~ND LOCATIN~ IN C~E~TERFIELD COUETYAND 2) DIS~U~gION O~ T~ on motion of Mr. Daniel, ~emondedbyMr. Barber~ the Board went into Executive session pursuant to Sec%ion 2.~-~44A.1., Code of Vir=inia, 19S0, as amended, relating tn the performance of a specific appointee of the Board and pursuant to Sections 2.1- 344A.5. end 2.1-344A.3. for 1) Discussion of the Lo~ation of a Prospective Business in the County Where No Previous Locating in Chesterfield County and 2) D~sou~ien O~ the Acquisition Or Use of Real Property for e Public Purpose. Vote: on ~otion of FE~. Warren, seconded by Mr. Barbur, th~ Board a~opted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ha~ thio day adjourned into ~xecutive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the Board and ~n accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and Wt4~EA$, the 9irginia Freedom of Infers=ion Act eZSective July 1, 198~ provides for certification that such Executive knowledge, i) only public Dusiness matters lawfully ~xamDted Act were discussed in the =xacutlve Session to which this certification applie~, and ii) only ~uch public basiness matt~r~ as w~r~ id~ntifi~ in the Motion by whiohthe E~eeutive Session was convened were dissents from this certification. Dr. Nicholas: Aye. Nr. Daniel ; Aye: Mr. Barber : Aye. ESTIMATED R~V~NUE~.~ND,ANINCRF~SE TO T~E TNSTRUCTTON APP~Oi~IATION IN SCHOOL GRANT~ On motion cf Kr. Danisl, seconded by Dr. ~ichelas, the soard adopted the following remolution: on ~etion of Mrs. Da~is, seconded by Mrs. P~ttitt, th~ $ohool Board requeszs the Board of Supe~isors to spprove the revenue r~visions and appropriation changes to $CJaOO1 Grmnt$ Pond as indicated below which requires an appropriation increase of $497,2~4 to the Instruction School Grants Fund: G~ant ~6 Title I Federal FY96 Drug Free Grant Federal F~ ~eadstart Grant Federal FY96 Preschool ~andicapped Federal FY96 Special ~d Kandicapped Federal FY96 Co~unity of Caring Federal Appropriation Category in the $370,056 51,2~0 25,45~ ( I0,500) 95-759 1~f13t95 F¥96 cen=emRorary Issues Federal ( §,000) FY96 Mentor Development State ( 5.700~ Total Increase to Instruction Appropriation Category in the School Grants gund ~ ~97.~64 Vote: Unanimous ~WARD OF CONTI:~.C? ?O I-V- N-.%RRXS kN'D ~SSOCIATES FOR THE NERDS ~SS~SsMENT ~I~D PLkNNIN~ STUDY FOR THE JUVEWIL~ On ~otiou O~ ~. ~a~iel, seeonde~ by Dr. Nicholas, the Board authorized th~ County Administrator to e~acute a cc~tract with I.v. Harri~ and Asso=iate~, iu the amount of $82,6~0, for the Need~ Assessment and Planning Study for the Juvenile Dete~tio~ ~o~e and transferred $S2,6SQ from the county's Reserve For Capital Projects for th~ Study. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with direction~ fro~ thi~ Board~ made report in writing upon his examination of the roads in Deer Run, Section 7, ~atoaoa District, and Engineering, the streets in Deer Run, See~ien ?, Matoaea District, meets the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department Of Transportation, and Wherea~, the County and the Virginia Department of Trans~ortatisn have entered into an agreument, recorded in Deed detention/retention £acilitie= in the County. Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Daniel, seconded by Dr. Nichol~s, it is resolved that the road~ in Deer Run, Section 7, Motoaoo District, be and they are established as public roads. And be it furthe~ resolved, that the Virginia Department of Tron~Dortation, be and is here~y re~uemted to toke in~o aha Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-2~9, Code of v~rg~nie, and the Departnent's Subdivision S=reet Requirements, the following: Name of Street: Deer Run Drive From: Bailey Bridge Road, State Rout~ 6~A~ O.~ mile north of N. sDring Run Road, Etat~ Route 652 · o: ~xieting Deer tun Dr~ve, Etate Route 4700, 0..13 m~ie northwes= of ~ailey ~rld~e Road, State Route 6~4 Guaranteed Ripht-of-Way of Width: 60 feet. Name of Street: Sunday Silence Lane From: Bailey Erldge Road, State Route 654, 0.47 mile north of ~. spring Run Road, State Route ~6~ To: Secretariat Drive, ~.03 mile north of Genuine Risk Lane Length: 0.13 mile Length: 0.30 mil~ 95-760 Guaranteed Right-of-way variable width: Na~e of Street: Secretariat Drlve From: Limits of Section 7, 0.84 mile south of Sunday Silence Lane To: Existing Secretariat Drive, State Route 4922; 0.06 mile east cf ~¢ntuoky Derby Drive, State Route 4920 Guaranteed Right-el-Way Width: 50 feet. Name of Street: Sunday Silence Court From: Permanent cul-de-sac, 0.0~ mile west cf Sunday silence Lane TO: Sunday Silence Lane, 0.12 mile of northwest of Secretariat Drive Guaranteed Right-of-Wuy Width: SO feet. Wame of ~treet: Ge~iBe Risk Lane From: Se=retarlat Drive, 0.03, nile south of Sunday Silence Lane TO: Deer Run Drive~ 0.04 mile northwest of Bailey Bridge Road, Guar~nt~ed Right-of-Way width: 50 feet. Name of Strmet: Winning Color= Lane Prom: Genuine Risk Lane, O.ll mile northeast of Secretariat Drive Existing winning Cole~ Lane, State Route 49S7, 0.04 mile southeast of Winning Colors Place, Dtate Route 4989 Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: S0 feet. Na~e of Street: Genuine Ri~ Court From: Genuine Risk Lane, 0.04 mile south of Deer Run D~ive TO: ~ermanent cul-de-sac, 0.05 mile northwest Of Genuin~ Risk G~a=ante=d Right-of-Way Width: 50 Name of Street: Sold Forbes ouaranteed Righ~-ef-Way width: 50 feet. To: Bold Forbes Lane, O.l~ mile Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width; 50 feet. Name of Street: Northern Denser court west of Secretariat Drive To: Secretariat Drive, 0.05 mile west of Secretariat Drive TO: secretariat Drive, 0,06 mile north of Worthern Dancer Court GuaManteed Right-of-Way Widt~ 50 feet. mile Length: 0.04 mile Length: 0.23 mile Length: 0.09 mile Length: 0.05 mile Length: 0.17 mile Len'gt~: 0.04 mile Length: 0.14 mile Length: 0.OR mile ?~is request is inclusive of the adjacent ~lope, sight distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Dep~rtmant of Transportation drainage easements indicated on the development plat. These road~ s~rv~ 144 lots. This section of Demr Run i~ recorded as Sestion 7, Plat Book 78, Page~ 4~, 4~, 47, & 48, June 1~92. 8.C.4. REQUEST FOR BINGO/PJ~FFLE ~R/4IT~ On motio~ OI Fnf. Daniel, seconde~ by Dr. ~ic~lolas, th~ Board apDroved the following bingo/raffle permits for calendar y~ar 1996: ,Oru~nization Midl0thian High School Band Manchester-Richmond Lodge No. 699 Loyal Order of Noose, Incorporated Women of the saint Augustine Roman Catholic ChuToh Richmond James River Lions ClUb La Scoiete Des 40 Chevaux volt,re Beach community Gran= Knigh~ of Columbus ~i~hop Iretcn Council Cavalier Athletic Club Matoaca High School South Richmond Rotary Club Brandermill Lione club Vet=: Unanimous RaS£1e Bingo/Raffle Ra~fl~ Raffle Bingo/Raffle Bingo/Raffle Bingo/F%a ff le Bingo Bingo Bingo Raffle weekly Raffle Bingo/Raffle ~WCROACH ~I~IN A PROPOSED BIXTEE~ POOT R~IT~Y On motion o~ Hr. Daniel, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, t~e Board approved a request from Trivedi, Incorporated %c have u conora~ sidewalk encroach within a Dropsied six=cch foot sanitary sewer easement, subject to the execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy o~ the vicinity sketch is filed with the paper~ of this Board.) and Ms. Betty J. Helsley and R.C. ~oleloy to rBmove pavement within a pertio~ of Harwick Drive, ~ubjoct to the execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: APPROVAL OF UTILITY CO~TRACT FOR OHESD~. L~_WDIN~ OFf- SITE WATER LINE On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconded by Dr. Kieholas, the Board approved the followinq ~tility centrust for Cheaden Landin~ o~-$ite Water Line, Proje¢= Number 95-005s, ~hich 9rojeot includes 10,180 L.F. ~ of 16 inch off-site water line and anthori~6~ the County Adminim%rator =0 execut~ any necessary Developer: Th~ Che~din Lsndln~ Company, L.L,C. Contractor: P~edmont Ccn~tr~ction Company~ Inc. Contract ~mount: Estimated Total $~20,777.00 Water (Off-site) (Refund thru connections) Estimated Developer Co~t: Co~a: (Off-Site) Dimtrict: Matoaca 5B-572VO-E4D On mo~ion oi ~r. Daniel, seconded by Dr. Nioholas, the Board approDriated $35~000 in Federal Duy Cure Block Gr~nt Revenue to the chos~er£ield community servioes Boa~d an~ s~prsvm~ grant fund exDenditure a~propriatlons~ in t/~e amount of $3~,000, by the ~ental Health/Mental Retardation/Subs=anco Ab~$e Department. vo~e: Unanimous 8.C.9.a. TO CONSIDER ~/~ ORDI~WCE VROVTDIN~ ~OR R~UNDS WITHI~ DRAINAGE DISTRIGTS On motion of Mr. Denial, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Boa~d set the date of January 3, 1996 at ?:00 ~.m. fur a 9ublis hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as amende~, by amending and reenactin~ seotien 18.1-27 relating ts refunde within drainage districts. 95-763 12/13/95 8.C.9.b. TO CONSIDER AND, O~DIN~NCB THAT WILL ISSUE, CREDIT TO DHVELOPEBS FO~ R~DU~IN~ CONSTRUCTION COSTS IN DP~%INAGE DISTRICTS On motion of ~r. Daniel, seconde~ by Dr. ~ioholas, the Board set the date of January 3, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing to ¢oasider an ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, ~y amending and reenacting Section 18.1-27 relating ~e reducing construction ~o~ts in drainage districts. vote: Unanimous 8,=.9.e. TO CONSIDER THE EXP~tNSION OF THE JEFFERSON B~VIS On ~otion of ~. Daniel, seconded by Dr, Nicholas, t_he Board set the date of January 3, %996 at ~:00 p.m. for a public hearing to consider adoption of a resolutlen supporting the ;Vote: Unanimous 8.C.9.d. TO ¢O~$ID~R CONV~¥~I~CB OPA P~/~CEL O~ 5~a~D I~ THB AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Dr. ~icholas, the Board set the date of January 3, 1996 at 7:00 D.m. for a public hearing to oon~ider the conveyance of a parcel Of la~d in the Airport Industrial Park (Airpark). Vote: Unanimous 8.C,.10, On motion of Mr. Daniel, ~econded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board authorized ~he County Attorney to proo~e~ with eminen~ ~omain on an ~merg~ncy basis and ex~rci~e i~ediate right-of-~ntry pursuant to Section 15.1-238.1 of the Code of virginia across Droperty owned by Quail Oaks Civic Association, Incorporated for the acquisition of s variable width Der~anent drainage easement and a variable width temporary con~%ruction and authorized the County Administrator to notify the owner by certified mail on December 1~, 1995 of the County's intention to take possession of ~h~ easement. (It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed with the p,pers of this Board.) On motion of ~. Daniel, ~conded by Dr. NiColas, the Board aocep%ed~ on behalf of the County~ ~e conveyance of a of lan~ containing 0.05~ acres a~joining the south right-of- way line o~ W~ll~ Road (St~t~ Route 6~3) from Kulyun, Incorporated, ~ Vlrglni~ Corporation, ~nd a%tborized th~ County Administrator to ex.cute the necessary d~ed. (It meted a copy of th~ plat i~ filed wi~ the paper~ of thi~ Vo=~: Unanimou~ REOUEST TO OUITCLAIMAN EXISTIN~ DRAINagE INCO~PO~TED On ~otion of ~. Daniel, seconded by Dr. Nioholas~ the Board au~orized %he Chairman of the Board and the County A~inistrator to ~xe~te a quitclaim deed to vacate a Do~tion of ~e plat' i~ filed wi~ the papers of thio Board.) Vote: Unanimous 8.C.1~. A~TBORIZ~TION TO TNTTT~TB ~ RB~ONTN~ ~ND ;~N ~M~MENT TO ~OI~DITIONAL USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT C~SB 96~N01~0 FOR S~FIC NON-RESIDENTIaL ~ORT~ONS On motion of ~. Daniel, seconded by D~. Nicholas, the initiated a rezoning and an amendment to Conditional rssidentlal portions of %he River's Bend ~roj~ot ~nd ~e filing of di~closu~e. Unanimous · .¢.X4. APPROVAL O~ TRAI4~FE~ IMPROVEKBNTB TO ME~DO~BROOK B~O~B~LL FIELD On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by D~. Nicholas, the Board approved the imcrease in the transfer to Schools fro~ Dale District Three Cent Remd Fund~, i~ t~e a~o~t of $5,000, for i~provement~ to Neadowbreok Baseball F~eld. Vd=e: Unanimouo referred consideration of amending the County's recommendation. Vote: Unanimou= $.0.1~. AI~E~DKENTS TO MINUTES S.¢.~6.a. SEPT~BBR ~# ~995 On motion of Nr. Daniel, eeeonded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board amended the minutes of september 13, 1995 to read as follows: "A~ ORDINANCE wheraby the COUNT~ OF CB=$TERFI=~D, VIRGINIA~ C~Y L. ~I~, WI~D T. H~T~ JR.~ ROBERT W. ~T, ROS~I~ Y. ~T, WTLSON A. YAG~R, and ROSA ~ P. YAGER, TRUSTEES OF THE P~SBYTERY OF THE J~ES ["G~TEE"), a 16~ alley and a pot=ich of a 20' alley within Redford~s subdivision, formerly Lots 8 and lO of Felling creek S~b~lvision, B~DA Ma~isterial Dis~ict, Chesterfield County~ Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recordad in 12/13/9~ the Clerk's Office of the Circui~ Court of County in Plat Book 5, 9age 71. WHEREAS, the TRU~TEE~ OF THE PRESBYTERY 0~ TNE petitioned the Board of Sn~ervioers of Chesterfield County, within Redford's Subdivi~ien~ formerly Lot~ 8 and 10 of Falling Creek Subdivision, BERMUDA Magisterial District, Chesterfield County~ Virginia more ~a~ticularly shew~ om a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 5, Page 71, by W. W. LA~ADE alley petitioned %o be vacated i~ more fully described follows: An ordinance to vacate a 16~ alley and a port~o~ of a ~0' alley within Subdiv~ion~ fc~erly Lots 8 and 1~ of Falling Creek Subdivision, ~e location of w~ioh is ~O~e f~lly ~o~ on a pla= ma~e by ~. W. ~P~E & BR0Z., dated APRIL 1D, 1919, and revised APRIL ~7~ 19~9, a copy Of is attaohed hereto and made a part cf thim Ordinance. ~EREAS, notice ha~ been given pursuant to Section 15.1-451 of the Code of vircinia, 19~0, aE amended, by continuance of th~ ~urtions of alley sought to be vacated the vacation will not abridge ~e rights of an~ citizen. NOW ~EREFORE, BE IT ORDAIN~ BY THE BO~ OF SUPE~ISORS OF CHEET~FIELD CO~TY, VIRGINIA: That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of virqinla~ 1950~ ag amended~ the aforesaid portions of alley be and are hereby vacated. accordan=e wi~ $~ction 1~.1-482(b) of the Code o~ Vircinia, together with ~e plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than ~ir~y days hereafter in the Clerk's Office th~ Circuit Court of Chesterfield cowry, ~irglnla to Section 15.1-485 of the Coda cf Virginia, 1950~ as ASS ia to destroy ~ force and effect of the record~nq of th~ portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinanc~ mhall fee simple title of the portions of alley hereby vacated in the property owner of the abutting lots within Redford's Subdlvlsion~ formerly Lots B and 10 of Fallln~ Cre~ ~ubdivision, free and ¢lear of any rights of public Sin~e the p~rtion of ~e Z0' all~y h~reby vau~ted i$ located on t~e ~eriD~ery of t~e afo~entioned recorded subdivision plat, this0rdinance shall vest fee simple title in the entire wid~ of the portion of ~e 2D' alley vacated in th~ owner of the ~ree abutting lots within Redford'~ Subdivision, formerly Lot~ 8 and 10 of Falling 95-764 12/13/95 Accordingly, this o~inance shall be indexed ~n the names of the COU~T~ OF CH~TERFI~I~ am grantor and CLStRENCE E. HAitRIS, DEBORAH K. HARRIS, C~.R~¥ L. FIN!<, WILLARD T. HEA~, ~., ROBERT W. ~T~ ROS~I~ YAG~, and ROSA ~E P. MAGER, ~USTEES OF TME PRESBYTERY OF ~E J~E~, or their successors in title, as grantse." "~ 0~IN~CE whsreby the COU~Y 0F C~ESTERPIB~, VIRGinia, ["G~TOR") vacates to C~ENCE ROSE~IE M. ~T, WILSO~ A. YAGER~ RO~A ~E P. YA~, and the TRUSTEES OF TE~ P~S~MTERY 16' alley and a portion of a 20' all~y within Redford'~ Subdivision, Soberly Lots S and 10 o= Fulling Cr~k Subdivision, B~A Hagiste~ial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly re~ord~ County in Plat Book 5, PSSe 71. ~E~AS, the ~USTEE2 OF THE PRESBMT~Y OF THE J~, ~==itione~ the So~rd of Supervisors of Chesterfield County~ Virginia to vacate a !6' alley and a portion within Redford'~ Su~ivision, formerly Lots 8 and Chemterfiald County, virgini~ more particularly ~own on a pla% cf record in th~ Clerk*s Office of the Circuit Court of sai~ C~unty in Pla% ~ook 5~ Page BROS., dated APRIL 1~, 1919, add revi~e~ APRIL 27, 19~9. The all~y p~titioned to be vacated follow~: An ordinance to vacate a 16' alley and a portion of a 20' alley within R~df~d'~ Subdivision, fu~erly Lots 8 and 10 of Falling C~ee~ Subdivision, the location of W. W. ~P~DE & BROS., dated APRIL 15, 19~9, and r~vised ~RIL 27, 19~9, a =opy OX which is attached hereto and made a part of this WHER~S, notice has be~n given purs%an~ ~ section 15.1-431 of the Code of Vircinia, 19~0, as amended, by WHER~8, no public necessity exists for =he continuanc~ of th~ portions of alley sought to be vacated and ~he vacation will not abridge the right~ of any citizen. NOW THEREFO~ BE IT ORDAINED S~P~VISORS OF CHESTERFIELD C0~TY, VIRGINIA: That pursuant to $eotion 1~.1-482(b) of the cod~ Vir=inia, 1950, as amended~ the afor~xaid Dortionm of all~y b~ and ar~ hsreby vacated. This Ordinance shall accordance with sectio~ 15.1-482(b} of tho Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a oe~=ified cody of =~is ordinanoe, to~ether with tho plat attached hereto shall be recorded no th~ Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia to Section 15.1-485 of the amended. 95-767 12/13/95 The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1- ~ is to destroy the force and effect of the r=Co~di~g of the portion of the plat vacated. This ordinance shall vest fee Simple title of the portlon~ of alley hereby vacated in the property owmer of the abutting lots within Redfard's subdivision, formerly Lots 8 a~A l0 of Falling Creek Subdivision, free and clear of any rights of public use. Since the portion ef the 20' alley hereby vacated is located on the periphery of the aforementioned recorded subdivision platr thi~ ordinance ~hall vest fee s~mple title in the entire width of th~ portion of the 20' alley being vacated in the owner of the three abutting lots within Re~or4~s Subdivision, formerly L0ta $ and 10 of Falling Creek Subdivision, f~ee and clear of any rights of p~blic Accordingly, this erdinanoe shall b= indexed in the na~es of the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD as grantor and CLARENCE H~AT~, JR., ROBERT W. }{~_RT, ROSEMARIE ¥. HART, WILSON A. .OF THE JA~IES, or their successors in title, as grantee. amended the minutes of November 8, 1995 to read as follow~: "On motion of Dr. Nicholas, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board Number Two with Pizzagalll Construction C~mpany, in the Plant Im~rovement~ Project. Aye~ : 14r. McNal~ Mr. Warren~ Mr. Daniel~ and Dr. Nicholas. Absent: Vote: TO: "On motlon of Dr. Nicholas~ sesonded by Mr. Daniel, the Board a~thori~d the Co~ty Administrator to execute Chang~ Order Number Two with Pizzagalll Construction Company~ in the amount Of $~0,$~, for ~he Falling Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project. Ayes : Mr. McHale, Mr. Warren, Mr. Daniel, end Dr. Nicholas. Vote: Unanimous 95-768 12/13/95 ~,~.~?, APPROVAL TO INCREASE APPrOPRIATIOnS TO THE 1995-96 approved an increase oS $26,852 in appropriations to the 1995-96 51tt,r an~ R~cycling Grant. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board approvGd schedulinq its Crqa~izational meeting and regular m~eting fur Janua~ 3, 1996 ~nstead of January 10/ 1996. Vote: Unanimous ACTIVITIES On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board Road F~nd, to the Black Bistory ~enth Com~ittme to provide additional funding for Black ~istory ~onth activities. Vote: Unanimous APPROPRIATION ~ND T]~NSFER OF ~UND~ ,POR pR~LTMTN~y MEAnO~VILLE ROAn k~R~ on notion of 1~. Daniel, s=conded by Dr. Nicholas, th~ Doard appropriated funds, in th~ a~oun~ of ~s4~595~ and transferred f~ndu, in th= umount of $414,30~ (as per sources identified), for =he preliminary engineering for an interchange on 1-295 at ~aadowville Road and ~uthorized the County Admln±~trator to enter into County/uunsul~ant/~evelcper/Virginia Department of Transportation/right-of-way/construction agreem~nt~, a~oep%abl~ ~c ~h~ County Attorney, for the 1-295/Meadowwille Road interchange. (It is noted source~ of funding ar~ as $~8,97~ transfer fro~ I-9~/Walthall Interchange Feasibility Account.) On motion c~ Mr. 0aniel, ~ecsnded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board hearing to consider tax exemption request o~ Qesignatud Driver~ Association, Incorpor~t~. Vote: Unanimou~ 95-769 12/13/95 ~UTHORI=ATION OF REOUEST OF D~P/kRTMBNT OF CORRECTION~ FOR ~ODIFIC~TION OF AIBPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK SIDE YARD DISTRIBUTION CHITI~BR IN THE AIRPARK Mr. Barber inq~/ired about the difference between this Teq~est and a similar request that was denied by the Board of Supervi~0r~. Mr. ~cLarcn ~tated th~ piece of p~operty that wa~ before the ~eer~ a oo~plm of months ago was a corner ~ieoe of property facing two public right-of-wuys, which would have had e tremendous amoun~ of visibl~ impact on the Airport. Be further stated the piece of property before the Board, ut thi~ ~ime, backs up to undeveloped property and will be internal to the site, so it will not be viewed from the road or adjacen~ properties. Ne stated the modification will also allow fur additional employment aBd expam~ion at Virginia proposal on the undeveloped property at ~is time. Mr. Barber then made a ~otion, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, for the Board to approve a request from the Department of iCcrrections for modification of Airport Industrial Park ~id~ SYa=d Restrictions at t~e Virginia Co~reotional Enterprises :Distribution Center in the Airport. Vote: Unanimous /~%TOA~ DISTRICT THREE CENT ROAD FURDS FOR PLAYGROUND EXPA]4ZION AT ~RENS~AW ELKMENTA]%Y ~CHOOL Mr. Barbmr stated that he teaches at Crenmhaw Elementary School, hewer=r, the County Attorney h=~ informed him t~at ~ve~ ~he~gh he teaches a~ the School, the~e is ~o specific conflict of interest because there is no direct benefit to him. Mr. Barber then mede a motion, seconded by Dr. Nicholae, for $2,00O, for playground e~pan~iun at Cr~n~haw ~lementary . School. 9, K~ARIN~S OF ¢ITIZ~S 0N UNSCHEDULED F~TT~RS OR CLAIKS There were no Hearings of Citizens on Unscheduled Matters or Claims at this time. On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board accepted the following report~: A r~port on Developer w~ter add ~ewer Co,tracts and a ~tatu~ report on the General Fund Balance; Reserve for Future Capital Projeets~ District Road an~ Street Light Tund~; and Lease Purchases. ~ld, ftkTther, the Board accepted t~he followinq roads into the State Secondary System: 95-770 EERKLEY PLACE. SECTION A - Route 3933 (Berkley Davi~ COUrt) - From $951 to 0.04 mile ~orthwest Route 3931 Route 39~1 (B~rkley Davi~ Drive) - From 0.15 milo Southwest Route 3930 to 0.27 Route ~9~4 (Barkley Davis Terrace) - From Route 3931 to 0.13 milo Northwest Route CAMERON RU~. $~CTION 5 - CEffsctive Route ~28~ (~aw ~ound Lane) - From 0.17 mile We~t Ro~te 3284 to Route 3286 R~ut~ 8709 (Rufford Court) - Prom Route to 0.04 ~ile Southeast Reut~ 3286 ~OUte 3708 (Ruffe~d Place} - ~rom Route 2286 to Route 1~75 Rout~ 4835 (Kogan'~ Alley) - From Route 4853 to Route 4836 RIVER'S EEND!..~ION 6 - (Effective 11-27-95) ST- ~a WOODS, a~CTION D - /~ffe~tive Route 6057 (Crawford Wood Drivs) - aoute ~05~ (crawford Wood Terraoe) - From Route 6051 (Hardwood Drive) - From mile Sou~ Rou~e 6054 to Re=~e 6057 Route 6056 (Havens Oaks circle) - From Route 6051 tQ 0.05 mile Northwest Route 9~-771 L~N~ 0.04 Mi 0.12 Mi O.X3 ~i 0.05 Mi 0.04 ~i 0.14 Mi 0,09 ~i 0.40 o. 1~ zi 0.1~ Ki 0.07 ~i 0.11 ~i 52/13/95 Route 6055 (Wilson Wood Road} - From 0.03 mils $o~thwect Route 6Q~2 On motio~ of Hr. D~rber, seGoqded by Hr. Warren, the Board recessed to the Admini~tretion Building, Room 5G2, dinner. Vote: Unanimous Reconvening: Reverend Sd Strans£i~ld, ~astor of Chester Baptist Church, ~ember~ of the Chesterfield ?lames U-14 Girls Travel Soccer Team led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of th~ Un£~ed States of America. Fnf. MoHale stated Mr. Daniel will be e×ousing himself from the remainder of the meeting as he is not feeling well and requested that zoning Case 955N8395 be moved to follow this item because the request is in Mr. Daniel~ Oistri~t. INC. requested resorting from Residential (R~7] to ~eigP~bcrhocd Business (C-~) with Conditional Uae Planned D~v~lopm~nt ~o permi~ laboratories and setback exceptions. A drug store/pharmacy is planned. However, with the approval T~is reques~ lies on 1,7 ac~e~ known as 592~ Hopkins Road. Tax Map 5~-1~ (~) Parcel ~0 (Sheet 1~). Mr. Jim Theobold, representing the applicant, stated the a~plioant i~ reque~=ing a thirty-day deferral. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Dr. N~:holaa, the Board On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, The Honorable 3. ~. ~eHale, III, Supervisor ~oDrenenting Bermuda District, served es Chairman of the Board of Supmrvi~orn from ~eptember, 1994 to December, i995; demonstrated exemplary leadership, courage, and insight in dealing with i~$ue$ facing the County; was responsive to the seeda of its citizens while maintaining the quality of life at an economically acceptable level; and demonstrated dndication of the highest caliber to promoting Chesterfield County as a progressive and well managed governmental entity throughout the Region, State, and Nation; and WHEREAS, F~r. Mc~alu's dependability, integrity, and expertise has been recognized net only by the ~oard, the Adlninistrstion, and County residents, but also by lscal and community and the public sector by participating in a marketing trip to Japan and Korea as Dart of the Southeast U.S. group to promot~ hu~in*~ ~tween Japan and Chesterfield County and initiating the Virginia Werk~ C0nferenoe at John Tyler Come,unity College; and WHEREAS, under Mr. Mo~ale~= Chairmanship, the County confronted many challenges and demands including construction of th~ Midlothian Library and Bensley Fire Station; completion of the Fair Groumd~ Exhibition/Christmas Building; expansion of the County-wide Curbsi~e Recycling Program; c~eati0n Of.the first Enterprise Zone in Chesterfield County; completion of $4.~ million in various County Airport improvemente; mignifioantly ~nhancing the Emergency Medical Service Dispatching System for the Firs Department; implementation of a Re~0te Network Access within the County; completion of landscaping enhancements aion~ the Jefferson Davis Bighway Corridor; completion of the addition to t/la seneley Community suilding; renovating over ~hlrty ~o~es a~d Oo~st~Otfon of two new homes in the ~efferson Davis Corridor area; completion of e pu~lic/prlvete partnership design study for the Village of Ch~ster~ development of a Ma~ter ~lan ~or Falling Creek Greenway; co~ sponsoring the Jefferson Davis Fall Festival; and initiating the Riverfronb Planning Process; and W~EREAS, Mr. Mc~ale has represented the county well by · erving cn the Appomattox Basin Industrial Corporation: the carpenter center Board of Directcrs~ N~tropelitan Richmond Conve~tioD and Visitors Bureau Board of Directors and Executive committee; the C~e~terfield/Colcnial H~igh~$ Social S~rvioes Board; the Capital Region Airport Commission; the Crater Planning District Commission; the R~chmcnd Regional Planning District Commission; and the Budget and Audit, Courts Space and family Courts, and School Board Liaison Committees. NOW, T~REFORE ~= IT R=~OL%r~D, that'theChsetem~ie~d- County Board of Supervisors does ~ereby recognize and the untiring effor=~ and commitment of excellence displayed by The Honorable J. L. MeHale, III. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of inscribed am follows: 95-773 J. L, MoHalm~ III Chairman Board of Supervisors, Chesterfield County Warren presented Mr. McHale with the executed resolution dsdiaated service and leadership cn the Bosrd ef Supervisors. McHale expressed appreciation for th~ re~ognitlon. FOR HI5 DISTINGUISHED SERVICE ON THE CHESTERFIELD BOI%RB OF On motion of the Board, the following re~olution WaS adopted: ~4~IR~A$, The Honorable Freddie W. Nicholas, .supervisor representing ~atoaca DistrAct, served on the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors from October, 1994 to DecemBer, 1995; and W~EREAS~ Dr. Nicholas h~s lived in Chesterfield County WHE~AS, Dr. Nicholas served, wi~ di~tin=tio~, an President of John ~ler Community College; a~ V~oe oS Virginia Statm Qniv~rsity, his alma mater; and as ~ancellor of the Virginia Sta~e Co--unity College System; and ~=R~A$, Dr. ~ioholas has served as an apprentice for nu~rou~ Virginin ~overnors; and ~EAS, Dr. Nichola~ ha~ attempted to retire on numerous occasions, only to have his retir~ent interrupted through ~ervice to the State and his co--unity; and ~EAS, Dr. ~icholms was c~lled out of retirement to serve the remainder of the te~ of his dear friend, the ~aley ~. Colbe=t, who represented the Matoaca District; and ~ER~A~, du~ing br. Nioholag' ~rvi=~, ~ere have been many accomplishment~ in ~e County and Matoaca Distriot ~aley M. Colbert Co~unlty Building; construction of two Co~i~ D~v~lop~Dt ~loak drant homo~ and renovating over ten older homes; the first ever Ettrlck Renaissance wan h~ld; ov~r forty-five r~identia] ~treetllght~ were installed; land~caplnq efforts enhanced the appearance along Chesterfield Avenue; trees were plante4 on the ~ickel Bridge; the widening of Route 360 at Route 288; and the ~lcan Quarry ~E~S, Dr. Nicholas has represented the County well by serving on ~e Crater Planning District Co~issi0n} Capital Area Training Consortium; ~e Ka~ont Foundation; th9 Tri-Cities Area Metropolitan Plannin~ Organisation; and the Co~ty's ~mployee Benefits, Office Space Needs~ and Solid ~E~AS, Dr. Nicholas leadership and good sense of humor will be Eissed; and ~EREA$, it is wldely known that Dr. ~icholas' time will De spent wit~ ~i6 family and playing qolf. 95-774 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLUED, that the Chesterfield County Board o~ Supervisors does hereby recognize and applaud the u~tirinq efforts and commitment of excellence di~plmyed by The Honorable Freddie W. Nicholas, Sr. AND, BE IT FURTHER R~S0LV=B, that the Board Of Supe~¥isors hereby presents Dr. Nicholas with a placfue inscribed as follows: Presented to ~:addle W. ~ickolse, By The Board of Supervisors, County of Chesterfield In Recognition c~ Distinguished Sez-;ica, Representing Matoaca Distr~at, on the Board of Supervisors of chesterfield County From October, 1994 to December, W_r. McHale presented Dr. ~ichola~ with the resolution and an inscribed plaque and expressed appreciation for hi~ dedicated service and leadership sn the ssard of Supervisors. Dr. Nicholas expressed appr~siation to his fellow Beard members and stated the reoognition~ outlined hav~ been 15.~. RECOGNIZING MCGUIRE0 WOOD~. B~TTL~ &_BOOTHB, L.5.P. the Business Office and Dir~ator of Government Services On motion of the Board, the following re~eluticn was adopted: W~RF~%$, Chesterfield County became the first COUnty in virginia to win the U.S. Senate Productivity and Quality citizens of the county, consistent wi=~ quality ~rinciples; provided support and encouragement to the County in its in public service; amd d~mon~trat~d it~ ~upp0rt of Chesterfield County by recognizing the County and its S~nate Productiuity Quality Award achievement at a reception h~ld at the 199~ Virginia recognition of Chesterfield County'~ quality and customer __ ;L ..... L Jl ...... L ,~l L ........... I Mr. MOHale presented the ~x~cuted resolution to Mr. Burtus and Mr. strickland and expressed appreciation for their support and recognition of Chesterfield connty~s quality and customer service efforts at th~ Conference. Mr. Burtus expressed appreciation for the resognition and stated McGuir~, W~od~, ~attle & Booth= recognises the ou=standing work uf Chesterfield COUnty and are Dleased to work with the County. ~$,H- EEeOGNIZINGMH. L~l~%Y E. WALTON FOR HiS ~ERVI~E AS PRESIDENT O~ UNITED N~Y SERVICE~ O~ RICHKOND Mr. Ramsay introduced ~r. Larry ~- Walton, President of united way Se~vics~ of Richmond, who was present the resolution. On motion of the Board, the fo!lowing resolution wa~ adopted: WHERE~, ~. Larry E. Walton has served as the President and Chief Professional officer of United Way Services of Richmond since February, 1991; and WHEREAS, Y~r. Walton~a leadership has resulted in an ever in=teasing umount uf donations to be contributed to the United Way Campaign; and W~R~A$~ under tho ~ir~ctio~ contributions have been tripled from $6.8 m~llion in 1988 to $21.3 million in 1995~ and ~E~A~, ~. Walton w~ responsible for pro~a~ing the United Way contributions to assist a population of over 900,000 in the e~nt~al Virginia r~ion; and WHE~AS, ~r. Walton provide~ i~ea~urable Ch~nterfield Co~ty in helping $1Q1~413 in 1995; and W~EREAS, because cf Mr. Watton's dedicated effo~t~, $739,000 to support 140 local community ~e~vice agenci%~; and ~EREAS, through ~. Walton's efforts, local United Way agencies assisted 36,S14 ~esterfleld rasid~ntE in 1994; and ~EREAS, Mr. Walton WaS aotively en~a~ed in a number o~ oo~uni=y orqaniza=ion~ and provided hi= energy, talent, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield Coun=y Board of supervisors 9ublicly Walton for his dedicated servic= to the County and surrounding areas and a~en~s its best wishes in his new poslt~on as the President and Chief Professional officer of th~ Uni~ Way of Central ~arylan~. ~ssnt: Mr. Uani~l. 12113195 and expressed appreciation for his dedicated service to United Way and ~i~had him well in his new position as President and Chief Professional Officer of the United Way of Central Maryland. Mr. Walton expressed appreciation for the recognition. 1~.c. REC0~N~ING ~1~, ~AGNU~ H. $0H~etO~ FOR HIS ~UPPORT OF TNB 1995 LOC;tL ~OVERNMENT AND 8~t{OOLS ~NITEDWAy ~PAIGN ~. Rammey introducmd Mr. Magnu~ ~. Uohn~on who was ~o r~c~ive t~ r~01ution. On motion of the Board, th~ following resolution wag a~oDted: ~, in 1994, the Local Government and Schuol~ Chesterfield, H~nover, and Henrico Countie~ and the City of Richmond ~tabli~hed their own modified Unl/~d Way Campaign ~or their ~loyees patterned after the Co~ined P~de~al Campaign; and Campaign is designed to give Local Government and School employees an opportunity to ~uDport local agenoies provldin~ "direct health a~d h~man s=rvices" in the metropolitan Ric~ond area~ and include all the l~calities in the Richmond Regional Planning ~EAE, ~. Lane B. Ramsey, ~asterfield County A~in~trator and Mr. Thomas a. ~lghum~ Chesterfield School ~=A$, Mr. Magnus H. Johnsson, Campaign Assooiate wi~ United ~ay ~ervices, coordinated the Campaign, providing bo~ technical and staff support; and ~E~AS, due to ~r. Johnsson's diligence and bard work, the Campaign ~xceede4 its goal this year, $739,~85~ a significant increase ove~ the $585,9~0 raised in 19~4~ and ~EREAS, Mr. Johnsson has displayed all ~he a~d attributes embraced in Chesterfield County's vision and his tireless efforts assisted th~ overall Cum~aign in beyond its Sal million goal. NOW, TH~R~POR~ ~ IT RESOLVED, tha~ the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors does hereby recognlz~ ~r. ~. Joknsson ~or his suppor= of t~e 1995 Local Government and Schools United Way Campaign and congratulates ~r. Johnsson and Unite~ Way Services Zor a successful 1995 Campaign.. A~D, S= IT ~THER RESOLVED, that the Board publicly cltizans of Chas=~rfield County and the n~tropolitan Richmond area, for his support of the Campaign. 95-777 12/13/99 AND, BE IT F~T~R R~$OLV~D that a copy of this r~molutlon be presented to Mr. Johnsson and that ~him resolution be permanently recorded among the paDers of this ~Qard Of $~p~rvimorm of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Ayes: Mr. ~c~ale, Mr. Warren, Mr. Barber, and D~. Nicholas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution %0 Mr. Johnm~on a~d expressed aDpreciatlon for his support of the 1995 Local Government and Schools U~i=ed Way Campaign. 15.D. RECOGNIZI~G~+ Loul~ ~N~RRSON FO~ HIS O~TST~NDING CONTRTBUTTONS TO ~RSTERFIELD COUNT~J~ VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY ~r. Stith introduce0 Mr. Louis Anderson, Head Football Coach~ and Dr. Claude ~lite, chief of Staff at Virginia State university, who were present to receive the re~olution. !on ~o~ion of =he Sourd, khe ~ollowing resolution wa~ adopted: WHEREAS, Mr. Lcui~ Ander~u~ ~rves a~ the Head Coach of the Virginia State University Football Team and has served in that capacity for flys seasons; and W~EREAS, the Virginia State University Eooth=ll Team, in its 199~ seamen, achieved an overall record of 8-2; and WHEREAS, the Team, under the leadership of Anderson, received the title of 1995 Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association Football Champions -- the first time in twenty-thres ysars ~hs University has been accorded this honor; and WHeReAS, ~r. And~r$o~ received th~ honor of Central Intercollegiate Athletic A~oc~atlon Football Coach of the Year in 1993; and W~EREAS, Mr. Anderson has been an educator in the public schools for thirty years; and W~R~A~, the Chesterfield County Board of S~e~visor~ appreuiates the work of Mr. Anderson and the recognition hi~ good ~ork has brought to Virginia State uniuersity and Cheeterflsld County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Anderson for his outstanding and significant and expresses their appreciation for his service te the co--unity and ~u Virginia stats University. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a oo~y of resolution be presented to Mr. ~derson and that this resolution be permanently reosrds~ among the ~apers of Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. Ayes: ~hr. McHale, Fir. Warrsn, ~Lr. Barber, and Dr. Nicholas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Dr. Niohola~ 9resente~ the eseou~a~ resolution to for his out~tanding oontributlons to the community an~ t-he U~versity, and congratulated hi~ a~d the Tes~ on an out~tsndlng year. 95-77~ 12/13/95 Dr. Flite and Virginia State Un±versify for the opportunity SOCCER T~/~FOR THEIR OU~B~A~DI~ RERREB~TA~ION OF CHESTERFIELD CO~Y ~r. Golden introduced ~. ~anni~ Kni~rie~a~, representing her husband, Mr. Robert ~ieri~m~n, Coach of the Chesterfield Fi~s U-14 Girls Travel Soccer Team; Mr, Tom Claytor, receiv~ the resolution. On motion ~f the ~oard, the following remolution wa~ adopted: ~EAS, the Dale Youth Soccsr Club and club comprised of over 900 participants; an~ ~EAS, the chesterfield Flame~ U-14 Girls Travel Socce~ Team, coached by ~. Robert Knieriemen, participated in the October, 1995 Colum~=s Day Tournamen~ and Dla~ed first ~EAS, the Chesterfield Flames playe~ in the tea~ Elkm Tournament on November 17-18~ 1995 in Raleigh, North Carolina and plac~d first in their division out of ten teams from the Eastern ~egion; and ~EAS~ the Chesterfield Flamem had an overall of 15-1-1 and consisted of the following play,rs: shelly Barnes; ~ari Belcher; Courtney Bradford; Lauren Clayton; Lin~say Goyne; Beth Jamckle; Dina Knieriemen; chri=~y Lloyd; Angela McDaniel; Cheri* Mo~he~; Katherine P~ug~; Amy sanderson; Kim Shore; Jamle Zelters; Lisa Knieriemen; and NOW, THE~FORE B~ IT ~SOLVED, that the Co~ty Board oS Sup~rvi~or~ ~o~ hereby reoognlze the Chesterfield Flumes U-~4 Girls Travel Soccer T~am for their ~D, ~E IT ~A RESOLVED, that the Board, on behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County, hereby commends the Ab=ent: ~. Daniel. Kr. McHal~ pr~ented th~ ~xecuted resolutions to Mrs. them on their achiev~ents and representation of Chesterfield County, and wished them continued ~uccess. ~. ~iernman read a le~ter~ on behalf of her husband~ to everyone who assisted and supported t~e Tea~ t~oug~out =he year. There were no Bearlng~ of Citizens on Unscheduled ~atter~ or Clalme at this time. 95-779 la/13/95 Mr. stith stated this date an~ time has been advertised for a Dubli= hearing to consider the sal~ of surplus County property along River Road. Ho one came forward to speak in favor of or against this issue. accepted an offer, in the amount of $40~1§0r for the purchase County Administrator to eiqn the necessary deed. Absent: Mr- Daniel. · 17,D. TO CONSIDER ~; ORDIN~NOE TO VACATE A PORTION OF ~ H~RWI~K bR~VE ~ TB~I~ORAR¥ TD~I~'A~OUND EASEHENT ~ND EIGHT FOOT AND SIXTEEN FOOT EASEHENTS WITHIN ~ir. ~tith ~tat~d thi~ dat~ =nd time ha~ b~un advertised for a of aarwick Driv~ and temDorary ~urnaround easemmnt and eight foot and sixteen foot easements within Stonehenge Subdivision, Section A. No She same ~orward ~o speak in favor of or a~ainst this ordinance. On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF (husband and wife), BETTY J. HELSLEY and R. C. HELSLEY ("O~ANTEES"), a portion of Harwick Drive and temporary turnaround across Lots 8C and ~, Stonehenge ~agisterial District, Cheuter£iald County, recorded in ~ha Clerk's office of ~he Circuit ~oard of supervisors of chesterfield county, wirginia to Chesterfield Csunty, Virginia ~ere Da=ticularly shown on a said County in Plat Book ~, Page 63, ~atud DCTO~=R 13, 1966. A portion of Harwlck Dr~ve and t~mporary subdivieion~ Section A, the locations of 95-780 12/13/95 which are more fully shown on the above mentioned plat, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance. ~EAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950~ as amended, by advertising; and, ~ER~A~, no public necessity exists ~or the vacated. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OP CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: That purmuant to Section l$.1-482(b) of the ~ virqlnia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of right of GP~/~T~ hereby oonv~ys unto GFJ{~TQR and GI~%lqTOR ~ereby County utilities end the facilities of GRANTOR'S franchisees over the right of way a~d alley easements hereby vacated. Thi~ O~d~nanc~ ~hall be in full force and ~ff~cf in 1950~ as amended, and a Certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the plat attached hermto shall be recorded nc sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Ceur~ ef Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the Code of virginia, 1~0, a~ amended. The effect of this ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1- 483 is to destroy the force and ~ffect of the recor~in~ of the portion of the plat vacated. Th~ Ordinance shall vest fee simple title of the right of way hereby vacated in the property owners of the abutting lots within stonehenge Subdivision, free and clear of any rights of public use. Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the ~a~e$ of the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD as GRANTOR, and JARES ROB~ZO~ and ~RkNCR~ ~. R0b~SO~ (husband and wife), and BETTY J. HELSLEY and R. C. EELSLE¥, or their succeusors in title, Absent: ~L~. Daniel. Mr. Micas stated this date and time ~as bean advertised ts ~e further stated in 199§ thi~ proper~y will generate $130.80 in County real estate No one came forward to speak in favor of or against this 9s-Tel On motion of Fa~. BarBer, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Bcar~ adopted the following resolution: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DES!GNATIOK OF PROPERTY RICPIMOND METROPOLITAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Richmond Metropolitan Habitat For Numanlty~ Inc. is a non-stock, non-profit corporation which is famili~; and County, Virginia; and authorized by Arbicle X, Section 6(a) (6) of the Constitution and so long as such organization is operated not for profit purpose for which the organization is classified; and ~E~g, th~ Board of Zup~rvi~org of Chegterfleld ~e adoption of thi~ resolution in support of the tax exempt sta:u~ of Ric~ond Metropolitan Habitat follows: 1- Rio~ond ~etropolitan Habita~ For Humanity, Inc. is exempt from federal income taxa=ion pursuant to Section 5Gl(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 19~6. No current annual alcoholic beveragm licenme for ~ervinq alcoholic beverages has been issued by ~e V~rgln~a Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to Ri~ond Metropolitan Habitat For Humanity, Inc. for 3. NO ~ira~tor or officer of R~chmond M~tropolitan Habitat For Humanity, Inc. is paid any in such position with the corporation. 4. No part of the net earnlng~ of Richmond Metropolitan Habitat For Humanity, Inc. inures to ~e benefit of any indlvidual. 5. Ri~ond N~tropolitan Habitat For H~anity, 6. No part of th~ 8ctivitie~ of Metropolitan ~abitat For H~a~ity, Inc. involves D~oDaganda or othe~ise attempting to ~nfluence The corporation does not participate in, or intervene in, any political campaign on behalf of any candida=e for public office. 7. Ri~ond Metropolitan Habitat For M~anlty, In=. has no rule~ regulation, policy or practice which discriminates on ~e basis of religious g. In 1995, the above-mentioned property was County real estat~ tax. In 1994, the property qenerated $~6~.60 in County real estate taxes. T~EREFORE, be it resolved ~y the Beard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County as 1. That this Board supports the request Richmond Matrspolltan Habitat For Humanity, Inc. for exemption from taxation of its real and DersonaI property pursuant to Article X, section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia and ~he provisions of the Code of Virginia, 1950, a~ amended, and that such exemption should be caSsgsrlze~ as churlta~le and benevolent. 2. Tha~ ~e County A~mlnlstrstor ~ directed to fo1~ward a certified cody of this resolution to the members the General Assembly repressntlng the County of ~heoterfield with ~he ~qu~t that ~e proper legislation be introduced in the General Ammembly to achieve the purposes of thio r~solution. Dec,bar 13, 1995. Ayes: ~. McMale, Mr. Warren~ Mr. Barber~ and Dr. Nicholas. Absent: ~. Panini. i?,D, TO ~ONeIDER ~N ORDIN~NOE TO AMEND THE ~ODE OF THE ~ REENACTING ~CTION ~-13 RELATIN~ TO 1~ ~X~I~N$. OF ~IHE ~0R FILIN~ PERSONAL ~RO~ERTY T~X RETU~8 ~D p~llo hearing %o con~ider an ordinance relating to t) e~ensions of time for filing per~onal property tax r~t~ns and ~} filin~ mobor v~hlcle personal property tax returns. NO one came fo~ard to speak in favor of or againot this i~sue. On me,ion of Mr. Darber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas~ the Board adopted the following ordinance: ~ILINS PERSONAL ~RO~E~TY TAX R~TU~$ AND ~) ~!LING BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of ~ester field County: (1) That Section 8-13 of the Code of th~ county oE read as follows: (e) ~ ~ension of time for the filing of tungible taxpayer. The taxpayer mum= submit him request for un m~mn~ion re~es~ for an extension of the filing date. Upon receipt of such r~quest, the co~issioner of the revenue shall grant or refuse the request~ and shall notify the taxpayer accordingly. A~y extension cf the filing date shall be for a fixed n~ber of daym not to ~xce~d, in any =v=nt, sixty (60) days. 12/13/95 (f) Matwithe=anding the filing requirements set out in thim ~ection, the most recent tax return filed prior to January 1, 1996 or any return filed thereafter shall be =he basis for the a~sessmcnt of a mo%or vehicle in all later year~ in which the commissioner of the revenue has net been informed of a a change in the situs or ownership of the vehicle. Motor vehicle owners are required to file a new personal property tax return on or before March 1 of any tax year for which ther~ i~ (i) a change in the name or sddres& of the person or persons owning the vehicle; (ii) a change in the situs of the vehicle; er (iii) any other change affecting ~he assessment of the personal property tax on the vehicle for which a ta~ rstmrm was previously file~. Motor vehicle owners are required %o file a return as set cut in sections 8-13(b) and 8-13.02 when acquiring one er mare vehicles for which no personal property ta~ return ha~ ba*n filed with the county. (2) That thi~ ordinance shall become effective .immediately upon a~option. · :.Ayes~ M~. Me-Hale, Mr. Warren, Mr. Barber, and Dr. Nicholas. ~Absent: Mr. Daniel. l?.E. TO CONSIBER~NORDINANCE TO~MENDT~E ~ODE aP THE COUNTY oF cKEST~RFIELD, ~975, ~ AK~DED, ~Y ~OI~ ~ REE~TIN~ SECTION 21.1-212 R~T~NG TO H~ Mr. Jacobsen stated this data and time has been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to height limitation of natural growth and ~se limitation~ in proximity to the chesterfield County Airport. There was brief discussion relative ts the amount and cost associated with the trees that will be impacted by this ur~inanue. Nc erie c~e forward :o ~paak in favor of or againnt th~ i~eue. On motion cf Mr. Barber, ~econded ~y Dr. Nicholas, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE TO ANEND THE COD~ OF T~E COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, ASA MEbTDED~ BY ~4ENDTNG AND R~E~ACTIN~ SECTION ~1.~-21~ R~LATING TO LIMITATION CF NA~ GROWTN ~D USE LIMITATIONS IN PROXIHITY T0 TH~ CHZST~FIELD C0~Y AIRPORT BE IT O~AINED by the Board of ~ugervisors of Chesterfiel~ County: (1) That Section 21.1-212 of ~e Code of the County of Chesterfield, 197~, as amended, is amende~ and reenacte~ to (a) In order to carry out the provisions of this ordinance, ~r~ are h~r~by ~tabli~he~ certain zone~ which in~lude all of the area and air,pace of the Catty of Chesterfield lying equal ~o and above the apgroach surfaoes, transitional ~u~face~ horizontal ~fades, a~d conical surfaces as they apply to the Che~erfielO County Airport. These zones are es%aDlishe~ as overlay zones, supe~imposed over the existing base zoning dlstrict~, being mere ~pecifically 9~-7R4 the base zones e×cept a~ provided for in this section. These (i) "Airport Zone": A horizontal zone that is centered about and above the runway, with the floor of the (ii) "Approach zone": A sloping zone that extends away from the runway ends along the ex~ended runway eenterline, with the floor sst by the approach surfaces. The lower surface of the approach zone equals the runway end elevation. The surface of the zone slopes upward az it eYt~nds away from the (i~i] "Transitional sons": A sloping zone that fans away p~rpondicular to the r~way centerline and approach surfaces, wi~h the floor se= by the transitional s~rfacos. (iv) #conical zcne~: A sloping xone that circles around the periphery of and outward fro~ th~ airport zone with the floor ~et by the conical surface. The lower ~urfa~e Of the conical zone touches the airport zone et an elevation of 387 elevation of 587 feet above mean sea level. (v) Primary zone: A generally horizontal zone that i~ o~nt~r~d about the runway. The surface of the zone i~ thc runway centerline. (vi) The source and the specific geometric design standard~ for these zomes are to be found in ~art Subcheptor = (Airspace), of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Footnote: A copy of this document may be r~viewe~ in the chos=erfiold Planning DeparTzment ~nd the office of the Director of Aviation Service~. The document ~ay De purchased from the superinten~en~ c£ Dccumonts~ P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15~-79S4 or by calling the Order and Information (b) Exoept as otherwise provided in this ordinance, in any zone created by thio ordinance no structur~ shall be erected, altered, or ~aintained, and no vegetation allowed to grow to a height so as to penetrate a~ any point any referenced surface, also known as the floor~ of any provided for in g~ction {a) o~ this ordinance. Chesterfield County shall pay the cost of removing or trimming vegetation that is required to be removed or %rimmed because it ham penetrated any referenced surface. (c) The height restrictions, or floer~, f~r the individual zones ~hall bo those planes delineated as surfaces in part 77.25, Sabohepter E (Airspace), of Title 1~ of the Code of Federal Regulations, or in successor federal regulations. (d) The permitted heights'of all bu'ildinqs, and $~ructures - shall be limitud to pr=v~nt intxrf~r~nc¢ with the emergency communication system. (e) Except for the height limits es set forth in this section, any other height llmitations specified in the zoning ordinance shall not oDDly te church spires, belfries, cupolas, domes, heat transfer units, tanks, monuments, water towers, chimneys, flues, flagpoles, radio or television antennas, or similar structures having am aggregate area less than twunty-fivu (25) percent of the ground floor building area, nor 12/13/95 the parapet walls or bulkheads extending not more than four (4) feet above the limiting height of the building, nor to grain elevators, derrioko or other necessary industrial, utility or public ~ervice mtructures; provided, tact no such structure shall exceed a height in any R, R-TH, R-MF, O-1 or C-1 District of fifty (5S) feet, nor in any other district of one hundred fifty (150) feet nor shall any ~uch structure penetrate the floor of any of the zones noted in this section. (f) For the purpose of this section, "structure" shall moan any object, including a mobile object, constructed or created by nan, including but not limited to buildings, towers, cranes, o~oKestecks, ea~t/~ fok~ations, overhead transmission (3) That thin ordinance ~hall become effective immediately upon adoption. Ayes~ ~. McKale~ Mr. Warren~ ~4r. Barber~ and Dr. Nicholas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. i?.F, TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AND OP~DER TO A~ANDON A PORTION OF WA~E ~OTTO~ BPRING~ ROAD, STATE ROUTE ~9~ Mr. stith ~tatcd thi~ date and time tau b=en advertised for a public hearing to conmider a resolution and order to abandon a portion of Ware Bottom springs Road, stats Route Ns one came forward to speak in favor of or against this ismue. adopted the following re~olution: WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of Transportation has abandon a portion of Ware Bottom Springs Road, State Route pursuant to Section 33.1-151, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended; and, WH=R~AS, Pursuant to a resolution of this Board November 8, 199S, the required notices of the Cuunty~s intention to abandon a purtiun of Ware Bottom springs Road, $~ato Route have bemn given in that: a notice wam posted on November 199S, in a least th~se places along Wa~e Bottom Springs Road, Routo 898; and on November 29, 1~95, and December 6, 1995, a notice was published in the Richmond Tines Dispatch and the Progress Index, having general circulation within the County announcing a ~ublic Hearing to receive comments concerning tho proposed abandonment; and on November 14, 1~95, a notice was sent to tk~ Commissioner ef the Virginia Department of Tranmportation; and, WHEREAS, after considering all evidence available, this oonti~anc= of thc section of State Route 898, Wure Dottom springs Road, from .14 mile sou~ Of state Route 10 to state Route 10, a distance of .14 mit= and h=rcby deems that ~eCtion of road is no longer necessary as a Dart of the secondary System of State Highways. NOW~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Beard of Supervisors hereby abandons the above describe~ section of Ware Bottom Springs Road, State Route 898 and removes it from the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1- 151~ COdS of virginia, 195D~ as am~e~; AND~ BE IT FURTI{ER RESOLVED, that ~ certified copy of this resolution bm forwarded to the Resident Engineer fur the Virginia Depamtment Of T~ansportation; and, AMD, B~ IT FURTHER R~S0LVEb, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby request that the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation certify in writing that the portion of War~ Bottom ~prlngm Road hereby abandoned is no longer 4aamed necessary for uses of the mecondary system of state highways pursuant to Section 33.1-1S4 of the Code of v~r~nia, 19~0, ag amended. Ayes: Mr. McHale, ~r. Warren, Mr. Barber, and Dr. Nicholas. Ab=ant: Mr. Daniel. 18. REO~BSTS FOR MOBILE HOMEO PERMITS ~ND RBZONIN~ 96~R0138 In Bermuda Magisterial District, DOU~L~S P~YHE requested renewal of Mobile Home Permit SSSR02~9 to park a mobile home in a Residential (R-7} District. The density of %his propoeal approximately 6.67 units ~er abra. The ComprehensiPe Plan designates the property for residential use of 2.51 to & unit~ ~or acre. This property ~ronts the west line of Senate Street, at Rycliff Avenue and is better known as 77~4 Senate ~tr~t. Tax MaD 67-10 (3) Rayon Park, Block lB, Lots 7 and S (Sheet ztaff r~oemmen~e approval of the request for seven ~ubject to standard conditions. Ho noted =he mobile ho~e is located in an area designated by the Jefferson Davis Corridor Plan for residential use. Mr. Douglas Payns stated ~h~ reoommen4ation is acceptable. There was no opposition on motion of Mr. McHale~ ~eeonded by D~. Nicholas, the Board approve~ Case 96SR013S for seven (7) years ~ubjeet to the fcllowinq condition~: The applicant shall be the owner and occupant Of the mobile home. r~n~al p~operty. Only one (1} mobile home shall be permitted to be parked on an individual lot cF parcel. 3. The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front yard, and other zoning r~quirements of %he applicable zoninq district =hall b~ complied ~ith~ e~c~pt that no mobile residence. No add&tional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home. All ~obile hones shall be skirted but shall not be placet on a permanent foundation. D. Where public [County) water and/or sewer are available, they shall be used. Upon being granted a Mobile Memo Permit, the applicant shall then obtain the necessary permits from the office of t~e B~ilding Official. T~is s~all be dona pri~r to the installation or relocation of the mobile home. Any violation of Ch~ above conditions shall be grounds for Mr. Daniel. 95-787 Ayes: Absent: 96~B016~ In Dele Magisterlal District, ~E~TY STEPHEN~ON requested renewal cf Mobile Home Permit 855R0276 to park a mobile home in a Residential (H-7) District. The density of thio proposal ia approximately 1.7§ unit~ par acre. The Comprehensive Plan de~ignateo the property for residential use of 1.51 =o 4.00 units per acre. This property front~ th~ ~outheast line of Hill Road, approximately 200 feet southwest of Canasta Drive, and is better know]l as 6515 Hill Roa~. Tax Map 66-1 (3) A~pthill Gardens, Section 2, Lot 48 (Sheet 22). F~. Jacobsen presented a summary of C~e 9~s~0161 ced ~tated a~aff recommends approval of the request for seven years subject to standard conditions. He noted tho mobil~ home lo lsca~ed in an arsa designated by the Central Area Land Use and Transoortation Plan for medium density residential use. Mr. Robert Frisco~ representing the applicant, orated the ~ecemmendauion is accepuaDle. There was ns opposition present. Mr. M~Hale a~ated it has been Mr. Daniel's practice ~o approve thi~ typ~ of r~que~t when there is no opposition. Boord approved Cane 96SR0161 for seven (7) years subject tot he following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be the owner and occupant of the mobile ho~e. 2. NO lot er parcel may be rented or lea~ed for u~o ac a mobile home ~ite, nor ~h~ll any mobkl~ hone be used for rental property. Only one Il) mobile home shall be permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel. The minimum lot olze, yard ~etbacks, required front yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable zoning district shall be complied with, except that no mobile home shall be located closer than ~o feet to any existing residence. 4. NO additional permanent-type living space may be added onto a mobile home. All mobile home~ sh~ll be skirted but shall eot be placed on a permanent £oundation. 5. Where public (County) water and~or sewer ars available, they shall be u~ed. shall then obtain the necessary permits Zrem the Office of the Building Official. This shall be done prior to thm installation or relocation of the mobile home. 7. Any viola:ion Of the above conditions s~all be groundo for revocation of the Mobile Home Permit. Absent: Fzr. Daniel. 96KP0134 In Bermuda Magisterial District, landmark designation is requests~ for ~EBDUE HOUSE. The Comprehensive Plan ~esignates the property for residential use of 2.S1 to 4.0 units per acre. This re,nest lies in a Residen=ial (R-Y) District on property known am 12~10 Percival Street. Tax Map 115-11 (2) Chester, sloc~ J2, Part of LO~S 396 an~ 397 [snee~ 32). Nr. Jacobsen presented a su~mary of Case 96HP0134 and stated the Planning Commission and staff recommends approval. Mr. Lee Richard Barber stated the recommendation ia acaeptable. There wa~ no opponition present. On motion of Mr. MoHale, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the approved Ca~e 95HP0134 mubject to the follow condition: The Perdue House structure located on Tax Map 115- 11(2) Chester, Block J~, ~ot ~9~ aaa ~? (sheet 32). Ayes: Mr. MeRale, ~ir. Warren, Mm. Barber, and Dr. Nicholas. Absent: ~r. Daniel. In ~o~ca Matings:iai District, removal of landmark designation i~ requested for TOMAHAWK. The Comprehensive Plan desi~ates the property for r~nid~nt~al una o~ ~.~ uni=~ per acre or le~s, regional ~ixed ~se and conservation use. re,est lies in Residential (R-9) and Corporate OffiU~ ~DiSt~iOtS On p~opa~ty formerly known as 2500 Old Hundred Road. Tax Map ~6-9 [1) Part of Parcel 1 (sheet ~r. J~cob~oa pre~nted ~ s~ary of Case 96HP0146 an~ stated the Planning Commission and staff reco~nd~ approv~l. further stated th~ pro, arty owner is not Dre~nt at th~ C~i~=ee and the Planning Co~on i~ to remove the landmark d~iqmation. on motion of Dr. NiColas, seconded by Mr. Barber, %h~ approved Case 96HP0146 subject to the following condition: Tax MaD 36 (1) Parcel 20 (Sh~t 13). Ayes: ~. Ko,ale, Mr. Warren, ~r. Barber, and Dr. ~sent: Mr. Daniel. 9E~N0148 In ~ermuda Magisterial District, HILL DEVELOPMENT AS80~., LTD. ~equ~ted amendment to ~O~ditional U~e ~lanned Developments (Cases 86S097~ 87S035~ 885N0061 and ~9SN0329) tn per~it si~qle family dwelling~ and bulk exceptions in a Residential District. 8pecifically, the applicant is Dropezin~ to eonsbrucb fifty-five [~D) single family dwellings on lots having a,minimum of 5,000 zquare feet, yielding a density Of approximately 4.7 units per acre. Further, exceptions to setback a~d lot f~o~taqe requirements is r=quested. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for residential use of 4.01 to 7.0 unit~ par acre. This request lies on 11.8 acres fronting approximately 1,100 £eet un the north line of Ironbridge Parkway, also fronting approximately 500 feet on the east line Of Ironbridge ~oulevard, and located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 114-6 {1) Part cf Parcel 1 (Sheet ~1). Mr. Jacobsen presented a eumnary of Case 969N0148 and stated th~ applicant i~ reque~tinq a nifty day d~ferral, ~e noted the applicant was unable to be present at thi~ meeting. 95-789 12/13/95 deferral, On motion of Mr. ~cHale, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, ~he Board approved deferred Case 96SN0%4~ until February 28, %996. In Matoaca Magisterial District, COM)~ONWF~LTH ~ INC. requested Conditisnal Use to per. it above-ground propane gas distribution facilities to serve area residences. The density of s~ch ~n~ent will be controlled by zoning condltlcns or Ordinance ~andards. T~e comDrehensive ~lan desi~ates the property for r~al conservation area use. Thi~ r~gua~: l~as in an Agricultural (A) District On 0.9 acres lying approximately 250 feet off the north line of Plantation Trace Place, approximately 500 feet wem= of Rivergmrk Drlvm. Tax Map 109-10 (1) Part of Parcel 3 (Sheet 29). ~r. 3a~obnon pregent~d a g~ary of Came 96SN0129 a~d the Planning Co~ission and &tall reco~ends approval mubjec= to GO~tXons and acceptance o~ proffered conditions. John Cogbill, ~$quire, representkDg the applicant, stated the Bauwens, a neig~or of the property site, i~ pre~nt at the meeting and has expressed concerns regardi~q safety and traffic. He further state~ th~ applicant w~ll continue to add~ess those concerns. The~e was no oDposition present. on motio~ of D~, Nicholas, seconded by Mr. Barber~ the Board apDroved Case 96s~0129 subject to ~e following 1. Ail mechanical e~ipment shall be enclosed by a minim~ six (6) fact high fancy, designed to p~eolude 2. v~hicular access shall ~e provid~ via a ~ingle driveway. This drive~ay ~halt be designed to provide off-stremt par~ing fo~ all ve~i~le~ ~e~v~o~ng~ DroDane ~acilitie~. ~i~ ~iv~way ~hall b~ graveled or paved and maintained to minimize dust or ~raoking problems and to proviOe ease of minimum of fifty (50) fee~ from ~ southern b~dary. 3. Wi~ the exception of lundscaping and a single access drlvaway, improvements shal~ D= set ~ao~ a minim~ fifty (50) f~t from property boundaries and from a future existing vegetation shall be prese~ed unle~ remo~ul apDrov~d by the Planning DeDar=men=. Existing vegetation shall be supplemented where necessary with additional land~¢aping t0 minimi~6 the view of ~ f~n~d enclosure and equipment from adjac~t propertie~. A landscaping the Planning Depar~ent for approval. 4. wi~ the exception of ~as=, which'may be planted outside material permitted wi~in ten (10) f~et of the fenced enclosure, (FP} (~OT~$: A. The requlr~mentm of this condition may Tree branches that encroach into the airspace above the ten (10) toot perimeter must be cut back to m~t requirements of this condition.) 5. The area within the fence esclosure shall be graveled and maintained so as to preclude the potential for grass, brush or other vegetation from growing around the propane gas storage tanks or other equipment. And, further, the Board a=cepted the fcllcwin~ proffered 1. Within the Spencer Ridge Way right of way, a minimum fifteen (15) foot wide driveway shall be constructed from Plantation Trace Place to the facility. Thi~ driveway shall be designed for adequate drainage, as determined by the Environmental Engineering Department at the time of site plan review and approval. This driveway shall be constructed with a minimum of six I6) inches of no. ~1 or no. 2tA ston~, T~e remainder of the right of way maintained to preclude growth in excess of eighteen (18) inches. · 2. Ther~ shall be no burning of brush, trees, debris, or any other matter on the propo~d ga~ facility site before, during or after construction of the facility. Ayes: Mr. Me, ale, Mr. Warren, Mr. Barber, and Dr. Absent: Mr. Daniel. conditional Tee to permit a child day care center in a Residential IR-71 District. The density of such amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The and proposed historic ~is~riet. This request lies on 4.0 acres the Planning Co~miseion and staff recommends approval subject to conditions. ~i~. Richard Hawkins, representing the applicant, stated the recontmendation is acceptable. There wa~ no opposition approved Case 96SN0131 subject to the following condltien~: for child day care use shall be sst back a minimum of forty (40) feet from the northern and western property boundaries. 2. Except where the r~quirements of the underlying Residential (R-7) zoning are more restrictive, any new requirements of the zoning Ordinance for commercial uses in the ~idlethian Villagm Core District. 3. A~y child day care uss may be conducted only ¢onjunotlon with a church usa on the p~operty, (P) (NO~E: These condition~ would not apply to any permittad use, such as a ehurch~ on the property.) Ayes: Mr. McHale, Hr. Warrant Hr. Barber~ and Br. Nicholas. Absent: Mr. Daniel. Mr. McHale expressed appreciation to the ~oard for thei~ ~upport while serving as Chairman and tO ~rm. ~arilyn Cole, Mrs. Lisa Elkc, ~rD. Dsbbie $altz, Mrs. Tracl Wright, Faith Davisr M~. Tammy Haskins, Ms. Him Conley, ~rs. An~ Crews! and others for their On motion of Mr. ~arber, seconded by Dr. NicholaS, the Board adjourned at 8:30 ~-m. until January Z, 1996 at 3:00 p.m. Vote: Unanimous La~e B. Ra~se~ ~ /~ county Administrator ~ 12/13/95