04-12-1995 MinutesBOARD OF SUFERVISORS
MINUTES
April 12, ~995
Supervisors in Attendansez
~r. Edwar~ B. Barber
Mr. Harry S. Daniel
Dr. Freddie W. Nicholas, Sr.
Mr, Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
95-195
staff in AtZendanee:
office on Youth
Mr. craig S. Bryan~, Dir.,
Mr. N. E. Car~ichael,
Commissioner of Revenue
M~. ~arilyn Tole~ Exes.
Asst. to County Admin.
Mr. Richard Coddle,
~ension Service
Le~is. Svcs. and
Intergove~$. Affairs
Mr. ~illiam D. Dupler,
Chief Robert L. Eases, Jr.,
Fire Department
Mr. Michael Golden, Dir.,
PaF~S and Reorea21cn
Mr. Bradford S. ~a~umer,
Deputy CO. Admin.,
Mr. Russell Harris,
County Ombudsman
Dir.~ Purchasing
Mr. John R. Liltard,
Dir., Airport
MS. ~ary Leu Lyle~
Oir+, Ao¢ounting
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Mr. ~. John ~ccracken,
Planning AdminiEtrator
Dir., Public Affairs
Col, J. B. Pittman, Jr.~
Clerk to the Seard
social Services
Dir., Budge2 & Mansgemsn%
Mr. K. O. stlth, Jr.,
Conununity Development
Dr. Robert Wagenknecht,
Dir., Libraries
Sheriff Clarence Williams,
sheriff's Department
Mr. Frederick Willis, Ur.,
Dir., Human Resource
Mr. McHmle called th~ regularly scheduled meeting to order at
3:00 p.m.
1. APPRO%q~L DF MINUTES
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
appruved the minutes of ~arch 22, 19~, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Dr. Nicholas, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved the minutes of March 29, 1995, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
~4r. Ram~ey read into the record a letter from the Richmond
city Manager regarding a resolution the city council adopted
expressing appreciation to the Commonwealth of Virginia and
the counties of chesterfield and ~enri¢o for contributions
towar~ Operation Pull Alert. ~e then introduced Chiefs E~nes
and Pittman to report on the March 8, 1995 storm
in the Deer Run area.
Chief ~aDe~ expressed appreciation to citiz~n~, police
officers, and County Departments including Real Estate
Emergency Operation~ Center Response Team,. Engineering, Fire,
~eneral services, aealth, Information systems Technology,
office, ~ocial services, County Administration, and the Board
of Supervisors for their efforts and support during end after
the storm. He expressed appr~eiatiun tu outside agencies for
their assistonce and support including the ~erican Red
Cross, the State Department of Public Safety, the State
Police, the Virginia Department of Tran~pontation, Blimpie~s,
and Ukrops ~upermarkets. He then presented a brie£ slide
presentation showing the damage caused by the storm.
Mr. Ramsey recognized County emDloyee~ involved in the
operation who were present at the meeting and expressed
appreciation for their effert~ fe~ a job well done.
F~Y. ~oHale expressed appreciation, on behalf of the Board and
County ~iti~eus, %0 all involved in the opera,ion for their
effort~ and rapid response to th~ emergency.
Dr. Nio~olas stated most of ths damage was in Matoaca
District and expressed appreciation to the Police and Fire
Departments for their efforts and particularly for escorting
stated he has Nritten letters to tho~e citizens who sustained
damag~ to their homes is deeply grateful for %ha rapid
response by County departments.
95-196
Dr. ~ichola~ ~tated he met with Matoaca Park Assosistion
repreaentat~va~ on March 31, 1995 and with residents of the
Beach/winterpock/ccalbore Roads area concerning the possible
reopening of the Vulcan Materials Quarry on April 3, 1995.
He further stated he attendmd a meeting with the Appomattox
Bazin Industrial Development Cooperation on April 6,
the Ettriok Community center ground-breaking oere~omy on
April 7, 1995, and the Virginia Rtate University National
Agricultural Alumni meeting on April S, 1995. He stated he
was tho guest speaker at the Children's Home uf Virginia
5aptlst on April 9, 199S and he elsm attended the Focus
Forward Action Plan Committee meeting and co-~haired the
Education Co~ittee on April 1!, 1995.
~r. Barber stated he met with severel of the Juvenile and
Domestic Relations Csurt judges regarding space needs; that
he participated i~ a f~nd~ais=r fur Crime Stoppers; and that
ho at=ended a PTA meeting at James Rivo~ High School. He
will be held on ~ay 1, 1995 with the ~opic of discussion
being planning and development in Midlothian District; that
t~s Ben Air community will bs hosting the Viotorian Day
Parade on May 13, 199~; and that Midlobhian village will be
hc=tlng Heritage Day on May 13, 199S to he held at Winfree
Baptist Church_ ~e ~tated the funding request for expansion
f~t~re opportunities for public input.
Zr. Warren stated he attended the Friends of the Clover Hill
Branch Library chapter meeting and he participated and was
speaker at a press conference regarding returning lottery
profit~ to ]omal governNent5 f~r education mhd encouraged the
large funding return to the County. He further stated
last constituents meeting wa~ held on April 3, 1995 wish the
topic cf discussion being General Assembly legislation, that
hls next constituents meeting will be held on ~ay 1, 1995
with the t0Di¢ of discussion being public safety, and that
his constituents meeting in June will be held on Juno ~,
with the topio of discussion being
~r, MoHale stated he participated with the community team
that is working =o restore Kenner Army M~spital ab Forb
un April 5, 1995. He further stated he attended the ribbon-
cutting ceremony st the Hill ~hoenix ~lant on Msro~ 29, 1995
and noted the Governor w~m also in attendance_
favorable comments made ~y the Governor on ~ow well tho
County did in moFing the Hill Phoenix project through its
site plan re~iew process.
Fir. McHale expressed appreciation to County staff for their
prompt action during that process whi=h he feels will make
the Co~ty more competitive.
4, REQUESTS TO POSTPO~ ACTION, EMERGENCY ~DDITION$. OR
GHAN~ES I~ THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
0~ ~otion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr, B&~be~, th= Boa~d
added Item 8.C.l.c., Adoption Of Resolution Recognizing
~ick Pronko for his Professional Service to Chesterfield
CO~ty as a Rspo~tsr ~or the Progress-Index ~u follow Item
8_C_l.b_, Adoption of Resolution Recognizing April
1995 as '~Volunte~r ApDreoiation ~e~k"; added Item
Refer to Planning Commission Development and Review of
S~bdivi~ie~ O~dinanoe Amendment to P~uvidu Notification to
~5-197 4/12/95
Adjacent Property Owner~ of Tentative Subdivision
Applications to follow 8.C.17.b., Acoepfanoe cf Parcel of
Land Along Church Road from F~r. Garland E. and M~. Dorothy $.
Mess; added Item ll.B.i., Executive Session Pursuunt to
Section E.l-344.A.?.~ code of vir~ini~ for consultation with
Legal Counsel Regarding Actual Litigation Relating to the
Enforcement of the Uniform Statewide Building Code =o be
beard with Item 11., an Executive Session Pursuant to
2.1-344.A.7., Code of Viroinis, 1950, as A/~ended, for
Consultation with Legal Counsel Regulating to Actual
Litigation Involving the Actions of Certain Palina Officers;
added an additional Item ll.B.2., Executive ~ession Pursuant
to Section 2.1-344.A.7.~ Code cf Virqinia~ for consulta=ion
with Legal counsel Regarding the Provision o~ Legal Advice
Relating to the Procurement of a Constructiu~ Co~tract
the Nursing Home to be heard after Item 6., Work Session on
the Proposed FY96 Budget; and deferred Item 7.B.,
Consideration of Request of Advance Energy Systems for
Modification of Airport Industrial Park Side Yard
Restrictions until May 10, 1995 and, adopted ~he agenOa, as
Vote: Unanimous
S. RE~OLUTION~ AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
MONTH"
M~. ~ith gtat~d child abum~ cronmem all walkm of life and
over 35,000 cases of child ~buse were investigated by the
Social Services Department in virginia in 1994- ~h~
to receive the resolution.
On mo=ion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WMEREA$, child abuse and neglect is a reality that
touches all segments of the community of Chesterfield County;
and
W~EEEAS, chesterfield County is committed to supporting
families through progrsms that will prevent child abuse and
neglect; and
W~EREAS, there are numerous dedicated individuals and
organizations in the County who work daily to break the cycle
families; and
W~EREAS, every child has a right to live rather than to
exist, to be s parson ra~her than a possession, and to ba
equal with every other human being, regardless of age; and
recognizes and supports the efforts to resolve the issue o~
child abuse and neglect and to promote D~evention service~ to
strengthen families in =he County.
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes the month of
d~dication to working with families and that thi~ resolution
95-198 4/12/95
Mr. ~c~ale presented th~ ~eou%ed resolution to Ms. Smith,
accompanied by several of the Department's child protective
child abuse and neglect,
~s_ Smith expressed appreciation for the recognition and
~hs Blue Ribbon Campaign, which pEcmotes child abuse
prevention.
$,E, RECOGNIZING APRIL 29, 1995 AS "CLE~N COUNTY DAY"
Mr. McHale introduced Ms. Suzan Craik, representing the Keep
Chesterfield Clean co~ittee, who was present to receive the
resolution.
On metie~ of the Board~ the following ~euolution was ~dop~ed;
WHEREAS, littering of public places and lands within
Chesterfield County is a clear and present danger to the
health and welfare of County citizens; and
WHEREAS, litter reduces th~ ~afe enjoyment of public
places wi~hln the lands of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, olean and orderly public roadways, Dar~s, and
other public plae~m ar~ essential to the economic and social
well being o~ County citizenm; and
WZ4~REAS, only eitizsns of Chesterfield County can reduce
the littering of public places.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLV~O, that the chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby reaegnizes April 29, 1995
as the first official "Clean County Day".
AND, BE IT FURTHER RE~OLVRD, that all citizens should be
supported and encouraqed ~o fulfill thei~ responsibility to
reduce llttering in public places.
Vote: Unanimou~
Mr. McHale presented the executed resolution ~e Ms. Craik and
encouraged everyone t~ reduce littering in public places.
~s. Craik e~presssd appreciation to the Board and presented a
litter bag to each Board member.
6. WORK SESSIONS
on t~e proposed FY96 Dudget.
compiled a list of various items the Board would like to add
back to tho budget if possible. He further stated ~taff
created a prioritized list ~f requests ma~e ~y Board members
in priority order and staff ~as addressed the funding for all
priority 1 and ~ items although funding ~or priority 3
have not yet bee~ identified. ~e stated Board
priority 3 item list and ~taff recommends funding for some of
~ha squipmen~ replacement and books at libra~ie~ on the
priority 3 li~t be funded through unspsn~ funds in
current year's budget or through ~urpt~s funds in next year's
budget. He further stated staff recommends addressing the
larger items remaining on the priority 3 list by leaving the
items unfunded at this time, with the understanding that
additional r~ve~ue becomes available, those items would be
the top priorities for receiving funding from additional
-- a piece of replacement apparatu~ far th~ Midlothlan Fire
Station -- be added to the priority 3 lis~. When asked, he
stated the replacement pumper for ~he Enos Fire Station io
priority 1 item.
Dr. Nicholas stated the repla~emen~ pumper for Matoaoa Fire
Station is critical and should b~ a high priority on the li~t
o~ reserve fun~s at the end of the fiscal year.
Mr. Daniel stated he feels ~his budge% process has proceeded
smoothly although every item is not included in the budget.
He further stated he feels staff has dons an excellent job in
prioritizing the requested items, that he feels cemfortabl~
with the budget as prsssnte~, and he can mupport a mo~ion to
approve the list as pre,anted with the concept that, although
unfunded at thio time! any additional surplus will be funded
toward th~ T~maining priority 3 items. Ne mtat~d h~ would
also like the Hoard to amend the budget to keep the current
the County to enforce the prohibition of commercial dump
the i~$ue is whether the fee should be raised to an
appropriate level and allow dump trucks Lo use transfer
stations or ~xclu~e dump trucks, in total, aL no price.
further stated he feels the issue is whether ~t would be
~air service ~o offer at ~ oertain price for allowing ~ump
activity should be banned and the Board ~hould consider the
.convenience of allowin? dump trucks to use transfer stations
at an appropriate price as opposed to the $3 fee.
inquired as to whether staff ha~ developed a pricing ~chednle
to allow dump truck~ to contlnu~ using the landfill slte~
even though they are commercial vehicle~.
Mr. Hammer stated two alternatives have been developed
including charging mingle/tandem axle trucko far bruoh debris
and shingles at a minimum charge of $~0 for asphalt shingles
and the second alternative would ban any trucks, except pick-
up trucks, from the tranmfer station. ~e further ~tat~d the
issue is one of fairness and cost and staff ~ould recommend
eliminating trucks altoqeth~r.
~r~ Warren stated there ~hould be no change is fee to the
homeownmr and inquired a~ to how brush is defined.
M~. Ha~er stated if the new fee oystem is initiated for the
continue to d~p brush and debris with pick-up trucks
wi~h an amendment to ~he Droposal to allow resident~ to
continue using the landfills aL the existing price and
banning commercial trucks, which could go to co~orclal
landfills.
Discussion, co~ment~, and qu~gtion~ ensued relative to
whether the recommendation is to stop commercial haulers or
to increase their fee; obtaining a ~oar~ consensus that
homeowner fees would not be increased; and instructing the
County Administrator to work out the details.
4/12/95
Nr. Ramsay clarified the County would not be including any
fee~ for larger trucks,, but would prohibit larger trucks from
coming into the landf~tl by directing thom to commercial
landfills.
Hr. Hammer stated he feels the beat manner in which to
add,ess this issue would be to prohibit single and twin axle
truoks from using tho oonvunience oeo:er.
Mr. MoH~le directed staff ta bring thi~ imasa back to the
B~a~d with the correct wording at the appropriate time-
Mr. Stepunaler then reviewed the School budget and funding for
the Virginia ce~umonweat%h unviersi~y (VCU) School of
Engineering and noted funding ha~ b~en d~layed until 1997
based on an agreemont among the localities. He statod VCU
has r~quested the Board adopt a resolution supporting funding
for the School in 1997, therefore, adoption of the re~olution
exprossing the Board's support is included in adoption cf the
budget. He further stated a Board mo~ber ha~ requested staff
a~nd the out y~ar~ (F¥19$~-~QQQ) of the FY1996-2000 Capital
Improvements Program to include the possibility of local
funds being made available to support expanoion of the
Richmond International Airport.
Mr. Ramsay statod the Board is schcdulmd to vote on th~
budget later in the agenda and t~at would be the approDrlete
time for the Board tu take action. When a~ked, he stated the
request for a piece of replacemen~ apparatus for Midlothian
Fire Station will ba added to the priority 3 list. He
clarified that when the 5eard adapts :he bud~at, it will
i~clude droppinq the fee increase at landfill~ and adding
fmnding in the out years (FY1998-2808} for the Richmond
International Airport to th~ ~996-~000 capital Improvements
11.B.2. EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSU/~NT TO 8ECTIO~
CODE OF VIRGINIA,_ FOR CONSULTATION WITH LEGAL COUNSEL
RES~RDING TH~ PROVI~IO~ OF LEGAL ADVI¢~ R~L~T~N~ TO
THE PRO~UREHENT OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE
On motion of Mr. Barber; ~condad by ~r- warren, the soard
~ent into Exaautive Session Pursuant to Section 2.1~344.A.7.,
Code of Virginia, 19~0, as Amended, for consultation with
Logal Counsel Regarding the Provision ef L®qal Advice
Relating LQ the ~roouremen: of a construction
the Nursing Homo.
~eeonvening:
On motion of Mr. B~rbor, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Soard
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has thi~ day adjourned
into E×~cutive Sea,ion i~ accordance with u formal vote of
the Board and in accordanco ~ith the provisions of the
virginia Freedom o£ In~ormatlcn Ac%; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Treedom of In£ormation Act
ef£aCtive July ~, 1989 provides for certification that such
Executive Session was conductsd in COnfOrmity Wit~ laW.
95-201 4/12/95
News TNEREPORE BE IT RESOLVED, the boRrd of Supervisors
does hereby certify that to the best of each member's
knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted
from open m~eting requirem~nt~ under %he Freedom of
Information Act were discussed in the Executive Session to
which this certification appligs, and
ii] only such public business mat~ers as were identified
in the Motion by which the E×ecutiv~ Session was convened
were heard, discussed, or considered by the Board. NO member
~issents from this certification.
The Board being polled, the vote was as follow~:
Dr. Nicholas: Aye.
Mr. Daniel: Aye.
~r, Barber: Aye.
~r. Warren: Aye.
Mr. McHale: Aye~
7. DEFERRED ITEMS
7.A. REOU=ST FOR A~PROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
Commission, end the private sector for their efforts in
Rarein~ Home. He reviewed BOard actions requested from the
and stated the Health center Commission received two bids on
the protected beds proposal in which one cf the bids was
d~squal~fied as it was not responsive to the request for
proposals. Ke further stated one construction bid received
was substantially higher than anticipated and ~taff is
working to either negotiate with the bidder to bring th~
contract closer to the architect's estimate or to re~id the
project; that staff has worked with Moody's, Standard &
package an~ they have suggeste~ it would be possible for the
Board to p~ovide a $~.~ million one time equity
th~ County Administrators~s race,ended $2 million equity
request of $2.5 million with a $1-$ million transition
the Board approve the desired funding option; schedule a
public hea~ing to appropriate capital and operating
the Intsrjuriediotienal Agreement; and direct staff to inform
the Rating Agencies of the Board's action. He then
H~alth Department; Mr. Joke East, Director of thc Nursing.
that the County's bond ratin~ will not be negatively
and indicated he suDpart~ the concept of a public/private
partnership.
95-202 4/12/95
Mr. Barber stated he is comfortable with the concept of a
public/private partnership. He £ur%her $~ated review Dy the
County's Rating Agencies questions the county's involvement
in the Nursing Home and tha~ the county does not leer at the
nursing ~ome as a business, but as a part of the
He stated the County Administrator's proposed financial
arrangement does not negatively impact the County's
Improvements Program and based on these safeguards and
parameters, he feels the Board can move forward on the
proj
Mr. Daniel expressed appreciation to ev~ry~n~ invelved in the
project for their efforts and ~upport. ~o ~tated the Nursing
He~e ha~ bee~ in the County for years and the County has
maintained its T~iple "A" bond rating even through its
involvement with the Nursing Home. Ke further stated he
feels the agreement i~ one that the County can move forward
and requested the Board Consider supporting the total $~.~
million to make the project financially whelm. He ~tated he
feel~ ~taff nced~ to proceed as quickly as possible on the
bi,ding process to bring the entire issue to closure as =he
Nursing Home i~ an a~et to the County's population.
Dr. Nicholas stated he met with members uf the Health Center
Commission and %he chairman of =he Commission r~qucstad him
to address past actions of present and previou~ Board~ of
Supervisors regarding the Nursing Home. He further stated he
has reviewed past records and all action~ were positive and
le~ toward construction sf a new nursing hone. He stated he
feels the Board should fund the County'n share of ~he $2.5
million, that he supports moving forward on the p~o~sct, and
funding option of $2.5 million of public funds; for the Board
to set the date of ~ay 10, 199~ fer a public hearing to
appropriate the necessary funds; ts authorize the County
Administrator and COunty A%tornuy to ex=cute all necessary
legal dseu/~ents; and for staff ts inform the Rating Agencie~
of the ~eard's action on ~his issue.
Warren stated %he proposed $2.5 million i~ net =he amount
recommended by the County Administrator and inquired as to
t~e rationale hehlmd th~ recommended $.5 million increase.
Mr. Daniel s=ate~ he feels the initial recommendation was for
a 50/50 partnering and the Board should provide the
$2.5 m~llion to en~ure the project gets off ts a
~tart.
Mr. Rameey ~tated h~ recommended $2 million as that is the
amount of funding available in the capibal R=~erve. He
further stated i£ the $2.5 million is approved, the Board
would have to take the additional $aQ0,QOU from the 1995/96
capital
Mr. Barber stated he is concerned about uhe County's debt
capacity and he feels in this case, the difference between
the $2.5 million and $2 million is that in 1996, fund~ that
would be available for projects will net be available as the
Board would have committed those future funds t0 ~he Nursing
~ome. He Surbher stated he feels there is a limit on the
amount ef funding the Board can provide and it is the
r~sponsibility of the Board to r~cognf~e that th~ Co~a~y
near t~at limit. He stated he feels the County
Administrator's recommendation ie nound~ that he s~ppor~$ the
d0~cep= Of part~e~i~g~ but he feels the Board needs to look
at future commitments and recognize the~e are limit~ to that
commitment.
95=203 4/12/95
Dr. Nicholas stated he concurs with the comments expressed by
Mr. Barber regarding the commitment of funds. He further
stated the Board has agreed to commib funds for construction
of the engineering school to promote economic development
the County and he feels the Nursing Moms is part of the
County's structure that w~lt accrue directly to the benefit
o4 County rasidsnta, therefore, he supports the Board
committing the additional future funding to the Nursing home.
Mr. McHale stated although he is concerned about the Bea~d
going beyond the County Administrator's recommendation, he
supportm th~ motion- Rs further stated projects not
appropriately funded will e×perienoe problems early in the
process and he feels the Board should mak~ its commitment
Mr. Warren stated based on the comments expressed and
funding not negatively impactin~ the. County's bond rating, he
Daniel, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, for the Board to
the desired funding option of $2.5 million of public
for the ~oard to set the data of May 10, 199S for a public
h~aring to appropriate the necessary fund~ to authorize th~
County Administrator and County Attorney to ezeo~te all
necessary legal documents; and for staff to inform the Rating
Agencies of the Board's ~ctien on this issue.
Vote: Unanimous
NEW BUSINESS
S,A,1. ~0 CONSIDER BDOPTION O~ ORDINANCE TO ~$TA~LIS~
THE CO~tY OF CHESTERFIELD
Mr. S~egmaier stated the Board held a public hearing on ~rch
29~ 1995 regarding adoption of an ordinance to establish an
annual tax levy on various classes c~ property ~or the County
of Chesterfield and reviewed the proposed rates as follows:
Real Estate S1.09
Personal Property $3.60
Machinery and Tools $1.OO
Airplanes
Personal Property
f~r Volunteer
Fir~fighter and
Rescue Sguad
M~mbers $0.96
Wild and E~ctic
Animals
ve~icles Using
Clean and Special
Fuels $3.24
when asked, ke stated if improvements are made on truo~s
uuing clean and special fuels and an assessment is made on
these improvements, t~e ~edueed average ~ats would offset any
additional tax that ~ight be paid on the improvements.
There was brief discussion relative to how alternative fuel
vehlo]e~ will ~e introduce~ into corporate fleets and the
number of alternative f~el vehicles currently in the County.
95-204 4/12/95
Dr. Nicholas stated he feels e~tabli~hing a tax rate of $0.01
for wild and exotic animals is more work thsn it ix worth and
inquired as to whether establishing the rate is mandatory by
sep&~ate rater but if not e~tablish~d, individuals will have
as ~he County is in a moderate/ncnat~ainment ar~a.
the opDortunity to adjust the rate acosrdingly~ as these
additional incentive will mak~ businesses move any faster
of a different decision. Ee stated he feels the Boar~ ~hould
support the recommendation of mtaff and can make adjustments
accordingly in the fu~ure~ therefore, he supports the
as the rate can bs adjustmd in the future.
significant nu~be~ of fleet vchicle~ ar~ rsquired to change
Mr. $~e~maier stated within tho next few year~ th~ dollar
regulation.
Board should support the proposed rate of
viable and what change~ might need to be mad~ to the State
Code to support the rate and tQ present hhis information to
the Board.
adopted the following ordinance:
of Chesterfield that for th~ year beginning on the first day
of January, 1~95, and ending on the thirty first day of
Decsmber, 1995, the taxes cn property in all the
Di~tri~t~ of the County of Chesterfield ahatl be as follows:
See- 1. Real Property sad Kebile Homes.
On tracts of land, lots or improvements thereon and on
mobile hemes the tax shall be $1.09 on every $1OO of assessed
v&lue thereof.
sec. 2. Personal Property.
(a) On autnnobilss~ trailers~ boat~ boat trailer~
other motor vehicles and en al1 tangible personal ~roperty
used or held in connection with any mining, manufacturing er
other busin~su, trade, occupation er pro~eDsion, including
furnishings, furniture and appliances in rental units, the
tax shall ~e $3.5O on every ~100 of the assessed value
thereof.
(b) On aircraft as defined by Section 58.1-3503 and -
3506 of the Cods of Uircinia, 1950, as amended, the tar shall
be $.50 on every $10Q of the assessed value thereof.
(c) On motor vehicles owned by members of volunteer
rescue squads, volunteer fire departmen=s~ volun=eer police
chaplains and by auxiliary police officers as provided in
section 8-13.3~ Code of the County Of Chesterfield. 1978, as
amended, the tax ~hall be $.96 on every $100 of th~ a~ed
value thereof.
(d) On wild or e~otic animals as defined by Section
~hall be $0.01 en every $~00 of the assessed value thereof-
defined in Section ~.i-2101 of the Cede of Viruinia, 19~0,
as amended, the tax shall be $3.24 o~ every $100 of the
assessed value thereof.
sec. 3. Public Smrvice Ceruoration Prouertv.
(a) On tha~ portion ef real estate and tangible
personal property of public service corporations which has
been equalized as provided in section 58.1-2604 cf the Code
of Virqinia, 19S0, as amended, the tax shall be $1-0~ on
every $100 of =ha assessed value thereof dnter~inod by the
State Corporation Co~uui~$ion.
(b) The foregoing subsection~ to the contrary
no~withstamding, on automobiles and trucks belonging to such
public service corporations the tax ~hall be $~.60 on every
$100 of assessed vslua thereof.
Sec. 4. ~achinsrv
On maohlnsry sad tools used ~n a manufacturing or mining
business %he tax shall be $1.00 on every $500 assessed value
thereof.
vote: Unanimous
8.A.2. TO COESIDER ~DO~TION OF PR0~O~ED FY96-Z00~ CAPITAL
IKPRO~EKE~T~ PROTRAK
~. Stegmsier stored staff is requesting adoption of the
FY96-FY1000 Capital Tmprevements ~rogrem~ including a
~ruposed amendmsn: to add SS million between FYPS-FY2000 for
improvements to the Richmond International Airport, which
hrlngn the total Capital Improvements Program to
million.
Capital Improvements Program and he f~els a 'public hearing
Airport expansion funding.
Mr. Daniel stated the Capital Improvements Program is a list
of items for consideration in future years and not
commitment to spend ~unds, except for the first yeam uf the
Program. He further orated a public hearing would be held on
any item prior to spending capital funds,
Dr. Nicholas inquired as to whether the other jurisdictions
have taken action on the Airport funding.
M~. Daniel ~tatad at this time there has not been a lot of
discussion on this particular issue as there is not a need
for immediate funding, but for future funding.
~r. Darber state~ he is still concerned about the Board
supporting the concept of the natatorium and he feel~ the
County is placin~ itself in the same position as it did with
th~ natatorium issue. ~e further stated he is uncomfortable
about taking a leading position on a regional issu~ without
knowing the position of th~ other jurisdictions.
~r. Daniel stated the request is not for a commitment of
funds, but is only for a capital plan designed to
attention and promote discussion on the item.
Dr. Nishola~ stated he eOhSU~s with the comments expressed by
Kr. Daniel as he feels the kichmcnd Interna~iunal Airport is
concerned about the County Baking a leading role without
knowing the position of either Henries County or the City of
Richmond. ~e further stated a~ ~he appropriate ~ime, the
County should participate in tee plan_
Capital Improvements Program wi~ an amendment that
million will be added to the Program between FYPS-F¥~000 for
improvements to the Richmond International Airport~ for
total capital Improvements Program of $301.7 million.
~r. McHale seconded the motion.
~r. Warren stated he feel~ the tenements expressed by Board
do not want ~o c~nu~it future Boards to future expendi=ures
and to ensure that there is public input received through
th~ public h~aring process O~ this issue. He further stated
asset to th~ region and will significantly improve economic
development and he supports including this item in the
Capital Improvements Program. He requested staff to ensure
the Board ~ieutss r~flect that the inteut of the motion is
for a public hearing to be scheduled at Lhe appropriate time;
that additional funding for improvements to the
International Airport be included in the Capital Improvements
Program along with oth~r items to be discus$~ by
soar~s; and that this s0ar~ has not committed any funding to
the Airport at this time.
Mr. Daniel stated the motion does not commit any funding and
noted the County Charter requires, by law~ that public
hearings are held un capital e×p~nditur~.
Mr~ ~cHale called for the vote on the motion mmda by Mr.
Daniel~ seconded by him~ for the Board to adopt the F~96-2000
Capital ~mprovements Program, as amended,
4/12/95
Nays: Mr. Barbe~.
Abstention: Dr. Nicholas.
Mr. Steg~aler stated the action requested is for the Board tc
in priority 1 and ~ in the ~eneral Pund; funding changes to
the Grants Funds and School Fund~ identifying p~ierity 3
items as i[ems %tat would receive funding in the future if
by eliminating the fss increases and prohibiting commercial
truck~ from using the landfills and ianguag~ relating t~ ~ha%
Virginia Commonwealth University Engineering School.
has a strong interest in providing the best atmosphere for
WHEREAS, one vital llnk for economic ~ev~lop~ent is an
lo. al university will enhance ~kis support; and
Virginia Hic~echnclogy Research Park; and
WHEREAS, an engineering school is also important tc tko
has given ~fficial support to the entablishm~nt of a fully-
accredited engineering school at Virginia commonwealtk
University (VCI3); an~
N~, the State Council of ~igher Education has
approved an en~ineerin~ ~chool for VCU ~ubjec: to the
University obtaining $17 million in pledges for start-up
WalK,Aa, VCU has requested start-up financial assistance
fTem lo.al jurisdictions in the metropolitan area.
NOW, ~EEREFOR~ B~ IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
county Board oi supervisors hereby supp0rt~ ~he e~tab!i~hment
of the VCU ~chool ~f Rngin~erieg and expresses it~ inten~ %9
ma~e a $500,000 donm~ion ~o ~he School for start-up capital
costs, in increments of $100,000 per year over the next five
fiscal years, beginning with iiacal year 1995-97, subjec~ to
appropriation by the Board on un annual basis.
Vote: Unanimous
(It is noted a copy of the priority 1r ~r and 3 items and a
copy of the ~olicy adopted ~y the Board on the Transfer
Station i~ filed witk the papers of this Board.)
~r. Warren commended staff and the Board for their planning
and management throughout the budget process.
~r. MoRale co--ended the Scard for making this a s~ooth
budget process,
F~. Ramsay expressed appreciation to the Board for their
significant funds to the education budget for next year and
focuses on public ~afety issues.
FUNDS FUR FY95-9~
F~. $=egmaier stated adoption of the budget does not
authorize the expenditure of any funds, but is accomp!i~hed
thro~g~ adoption of the appropriation resolution and that
s~aff recommends adoption of a resole%ion which is required
by the County Charter and State Code. He further stated the
resolution withholds $4.~ million of local funding for
schools from the appropriation and gives the County
Administrator authority to release those funds during the
ne~t fiscal year. He stated oonsistent ~ith the request of
th~ ~oard of Supervisors and the Budget and Audit co~ittee,
the appropriations this year will be made at a slightly
different level t~an prior yea~s in or,er to comply with
chang~m in the requirements, imposed om the County by the
Auditor of Public Aoooun=~, easier to accomplish.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
A~PROPRIATIONS R~SOLUTION
A RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE DESIGNATED FUNDS A/~D ACCOUNTS
FROM DESIGnATeD ~$Ti~L%T~D R~NUES FOR FY96 FOR THE OPERATING
BUDGET AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRA~ FOR THE CO~TY OF
CHESTERFIELD ~D A RESOLUTION TO RESTATE ~D
THE FY95 0PE~TIKG EXPENDIT~ES FOR THE GENE~L FUND FOR THE
Coumty of Chesterfield:
(1} T~at io~ the figeal ~uar beginnin~ on the first day
of July, 1994, and endin~ on ~e =~irtieth day oS Jun~,
and that for the fiucal year beginning on the firm~3'~ay of
July, 1996, and ending un ~h= thirtieth day of July, 1996,
the following sectionm shall bm mdopted:
$~_....3 The following designated funds and accounts mhall
operate and to provide a capital improvements program fo~ ~he
County:
General Fund
Estimated Revenue:
From Local Sources
General Property Taxes $18~966,600
Other Local Taxo~
Fine~ ~ ~orfeitures S~0,SQ0
Othe~ Local Revenue 1~740,900
From Other Agencies
Anticipated Fund Balance 7/1/95
Total Revenue
Ge~eral Government 18,054,100
Administration of Justice
Public Safety
Health and Welfare 28,592,700
Parks, Rsc.. cultural 7,914,500
Non-Departmental 7,937,500
Debt Service 13~103,400
Operatin~ Transfers 149,533,700
Health Center Commission 443,000
Total General Fund:
Estimated Revenue:
Fro~ General Fund
Total Revenue
Appropriatien~
Operating Expenses
Total Comprehensive Services ~und
School OD~rat~nq Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Local Sources
Stat~
Federal
Transfer from School CIP Fund
State Sales
Beginning Fund Balance
Total R~venue ~chool Op~iating Funds:
Appropriations:
Instruction (includes $1~010,900
Co~pr~hen~iv~ Services Act)
Administration/A.&
Pupil Tranmportation
operations and Maintenance
Debt Service
Food Servic~
Total Approp/iations £er School
Operating Funds:
school capital Projeots Fund
Total Revenue ~chool Capitai
Appropriations:
Tranmfer to School Operatin~ Fund
Total Appropriations School Capital
Projects Fund:
7,573~800
22.327.600
~Y96
18,444,300
29,426,700
8,305,~00
9,291,000
160,559~100
~46,600
337,321,100
491~500
1.010,900
2,637,000
~,657,000
95~930/500
7,7~3,10Q
594t000
25~994~700
1,000~000
$180,5~2t990
8,847,965
27,677t551
27,294,000
9.400.OOU
$265,708,300
584.000
584,000
95-~10 4/12/95
County Grants Fund
Prom the General Fund
Total Revenue
Community Diversion Inoentive
Youth Services
victim/wXtnes$ Assistance
Litter GTant
~ental Health
Pretrial Release
Community Development Block Grant
Housing
Drug Prosecution
Total County Grant Fund
County tIP Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Interest Earnings
Transfer from General Fund Total Revenue
~xpQnditur~=:
County Capital Projects
Total County tip Fund
County Maintenance Projects Pond
Estimated Revenue~
Total Revenue
Appropriations:
County Maintenance Projects
Total County Maintenanc~ Projects
vehicl= and Communications ~aintenance
Estimated Revenue:
Appropriations:
County ~arage & Motor Pool
Communications/Electronics
Total vehicl~ and Communications
Maintenance
Ris~ ~ana~ement Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Service charges
~ginnln~ ~und Equity, 07/01/95
Total Revenue
Appropriations:
Risk Management 0Derations
Transfer to the General Fund
Ending Fund Equity, 06/3Q/g&
Total Risk ~anegement Fund
~toreroom and Warehouse Fund
Emtimated Revenue:
Sales
service charges
Total Reven~s
2,567,0~
530,500
9?,000
62,200
1~,100
13tO00
13§,600
1,454,000
17~,400
88.200
2,~67,QQQ
42,609
750,000
149,300
200,2QQ
443
5,443,100
1,0OO,00O
1,000,000
lr00O~000
1~000,000
7~671,400
7,575,4~0
3,2~,000
7,32~,200
3,236,000
650,000
3 439 200
1,938,700
518.100
2,Q66,SDQ
Operating Expenses
Total Storeroom and Warehouse Fund
Internal Distribution and O~erations Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Saie~ 275,000
Transfer from General Fund 60,200
Transfer from School Operating Funds 119.S00
Total Revenue 455,000
Appropriations:
Opera=lng ERpenee~ 455.00~
Total Internal Distribution and Oper. Fund 455,000
County Airport Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Use of Msney and Property
Total Revenue ~77,~0Q
Appropriations:
Airport Operations
Total County Airport Fund
Airmort caui~al ImDrovement Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Transfer from General Fund 279.700
Appropriations:
Capital Improvements
Estimated Revenue:
Service Charge~
U~e of Reserves
Total Revenue:
Appropriations: Operation~
Transfer to County Capital Projects
Capital
2~086,g00
30,935,000
8,700,800
4,42~000
~4,757~00
86~000
17.~16.500
Sec. 2 Apprepriation~ in addition ho tho~e contained in the
general appropriation resolution may ~e made Dy ~hs Board
only if the~e is available in the fund au unemcumbered and
unappropriate~ sum sufficient to meet such appropriations.
Sec. S Except as set forth in Sections 7, 13, 14, 16, 17,
16, 19, and 20 tbs County Admlni~trstor nay, an provided
portion thereof from one classification of expenditure ts
~nother within the same department or appropriation
funotion/oa=egory. T~e County Administrator may transfer up
to $~0,000 from the unencumbered.balance of the appropriation.
of one appropriation function/cateqery to another
appropriation function/cateqory_ No more tha~ one transfer
may be made for the same item cauming the need fo~ a
transfer, unle~ the total amount tO be ~ransferred for the
item does not exceed $20,000.
Sec. ~ The County Administrator may increase appropriations
for the following items of non-budgetsd revenue that say
occur durinq the fiscal year:
a. Insurance recoveries received for damage to Co~ty
vehicles or otker property for which County funds
hays bess e×p~nded to make repairs.
b. Refund~ or reimbursement~ made ts the County for
which the County has expended funds directly
related to that ~efund or reimbursement.
c. Any revenue ~ourc~ not to exceed $20,000.
Sec. 5 {e) Ail eut~tanding encumbrances, both operating and
uapital, ut June 30, 1995 sh~ll be reapproprlatsd to the
1995-96 fiec&l year to th~ sam~ department and account for
which they are encumbered in the previous year.
Sec. 5 (b) At the cto~e of 2he fiscal year, all unencumbered
appropriations lapse for budget items other than Capital
Projeots, reserves, refunds for off-site and oversize water
and wast~water facilities, grants, and donations restricted
sec. 6 Appropriations designated for capital project~ will
not lapse at the sad of th~ fiscal year but shall remain
appropriations until the completion of the project or until
resolution, cha~gss o~ eliminates the appropriation. The
county Administrator may approve necessary accounting
tr&nsfer~ bet~ee~ funds to ~nable the capital projects to be
accounted for in %he correct manner. Upon completion cf a
capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project
and transfer to the funding souruc any remaining balances.
Thim section applies to all e~isting appropriations for
Capital P~ejects a% June 30, 1995 and appropriations in the
1995-96 budg%f. The County Administrator may approv~
$15,0~0 and approve all change orders for reductions to
Sec. 7 That the County Administrator may authorize the
transfer of Utilities Capital Projects fonts that ar~ 20% ur
up Po $1Q0,00O of the or/ginal project cost, whichever is
l~ss, from any Utilities Capital Project to any other
utili=ies cupi:al Pro,eot or to the original funding source.
Should the actual contract prie~ for a p~oject bs
significantly {over $100,000) less than the appropriation,
th~ County kdministrator may approve transfer of excess funds
to the funding sourss prior to completion of the project.
Sec. 8 That the approval by the Board cf Supervisors of any
grant of funds to the County constitutes thc appropriation of
both the revunue to be receLved from the grant and the
County's expenditure required by thm terms cf the grant, if
amy. Allocation cf Pood Stamps will be considered a Round
approved grant for purposes o~ this section up to the actual
val~e Of food stamps received. The appropriation of grant
funds will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year, but sh~ll
remain appropriated until completion of the project or until
t~e Board Of Supervisors, by apprspriate resolution, changes
or eliminat~ the approprXa%ion, The County Administrator
may reduce any grant appropriation to the level apprDvedby"
the granting ~geney during the fiscal year. The County
Administrator may approve n~cessary accounting transfers
between funds to enable the grant to be ac~ounhe~ for in the
correct manner. Upon completion of a grant project, staff is
authorized to clo~ out the grant and transfer ~uck tc the
funding source any remaining bslances~ This applies to
appropriations for grants outstanding at ~une 30, 1995 and
appropriations in the 1995-96 budget.
Sec. 9 The County Administrator may appropriate both
revenue and expenditure for donations made by citizens or
citizen groups in support of County programs. Any remaining
unencumbered b~lanc~ of a restricted donation at the end of
the fiseat year will be reappropriated into the ~ub~equent
fiscal year.
Sec. 10 The County Administrator may reduce revenue and
expenditure appropriations related to prsgramz funded all or
in part by the Commonwealth of Virginia and/or the federal
government to the level approved by the responsible state er
federal agency.
s~e. 11 The Director of the Accounting Department is autho-
are transfers budgeted. The Director shall transfer funds
only as needed up to amounts budgeted, or in accordance with
any existing bond resolutions that specify the manner in
which transfers are to be made.
various funds of the County to allow maximum sash flow effl-
clancy. The advances must no~ violate county bond covenants
or other legal restrictions ~hat would prohibit an advance.
~e=, 13 The County Administrator is authorized to make
expenditures from Trust & Agency Funds for the specified
ree~on~ for which the funds were established. In no ~ase
shall the expenditure exceed the available balance in the
fund.
Sec..14 The County Administrator may transfer supplemental
retirement, Worker's Compensation fund~, healthcare for
retirees, and/or any amount of the Insurance Reserve funds
consistent with the County's Risk Management program to
deD&rt~e~ts, as needed.
Sec. 15 The portion of the reserve for capital projects
related to the school budget will be added to the reserve for
future napital projects in the general fund7 the portion
related to the school bud~e~ will be ~esignatad for school
prejeet~.
sec. 16 The County Administrator may appropriate revenues
and increase expenditures for funds received by t~e CC~%y
from asset forfeitures for operating expenditures dir%ctly
related ro drug ~nZorcement. T~i$ applies to funds currently
on-hand at June 30, 199~, and all funds recaivsd in the 1995-
96 budget y~ar.
The eu~a%andiag balance of thsse funds at June 30, 1995 or
June 30, 1996 shall not lapse but be carried forward into the
nex~ fiscal year.
Sec. 17 The County Administrator may increass tbs general
fund appropriation in the School Operating Fund contingent
upon availability of funding and taking into considerations
any ether e~pendltures which may have occurred b~ued ~n thc
following schedule:
a. Increase general fund transfer/appropriation on
Deco,be= 15 by Si,aGO,QUO.
b. fncr=use qeneral fund transfer/appropriation on
Februa=y 15 by $1,aOQ,QQQ.
Increase general fund transfmr/appropriation sn
April 15 by $1,500,006.
95-214 4/12/95
for General Fund and School Operating ~und~, the County
er authorize transfers of existing appropriation~ at June 30
us follows:
a. Subsequent to all audit adjustments and the ~ndin~
general fund balance i~ maintained at a maximum of 7.5%
of general fund e~penditure~, t~anefer all available
~urren% year operating funds ~o the general fund
re~erve for future capital projects.
Thi~ applie~ to funds currently on-hand ah June 30,
i99D, and all funds received in the 1995-96 budget
Sec. 19 The County Administrator is authorized to reullocut~
funding sources for Capital Projects, arbitrage
rebates/penaltiee, end debt services paymentm and to
appropriate bond interest earnings to minimize arblhrage
~ebetes/penalties. This authority would includ~ the
appropriation of ~ranefers umen~ funds ~o accomplish ~uch
reallocations. Budg~t~ for specific Capital Project~ will
net be increueed beyond the level authorized by Sections 3
and 4-
This applle~ to funds currently on-hand in FY96~ and all
funds received in the 1995-96 budget year.
Sec. 20 The County Adm~niztrator is auth0rised to transfer
among appropriation categorie~ any amount of funds
wit~ implementation of the Comprehensive Services Act for at-
risk youth and families to record transactions.
ell fund~ for the purchase of items to cemply wi~h the
American Disabilities Act and to approve the necessary
accounting entries ~et~een funds to exchang~ Community
Development ~lock Grant funding for A.D.A.
Sec. ~ salaries for Planning Conmissloner~ will be
increased ~q~i~alent to the increase given to all County
employees.
Sec. 23 ~ffec~ive upon adoption of this resolution,
County Ad~ini~trator i~ ~uthorized to approve transfers amung
funds as long us total n~ spending is no~ increased.
Vote: Unanimous
8.B. ~OINTKENT~
On motion of Mr, Warren, seconded by Dr. Niehulas, ~he ~oard
nomination/reappointment of a member to serve on the Camp
On marion of Mr. Warren, uuconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
simultaneously neminatad/reuppuinte~ ~r. Vince Burgess,
representing Clover Mill District, to serve on the Camp Baker
Management Hoard, whose term is effective May t, 1995 and
will expire April ~0, 199S.
Vote: Unanimous
CONSENT ITEMS
~DOPTION OF ~ESOLUTIONS
DEVELOPMENT ~UTNORITY ~O~ ISS~C~ OF INDUSTRT~
adopted the following resolution:
application of Fountainhead LLC, a Virginia limited liability
company (the "Company"), for the iesuance of the Authority's
industrial development revenue bonds in an amount not to
exceed $6,5U0,000 (the "Bonda") to a~si~t in the financing of
th~ acquisition of land in the chesterfield Indus%rlal Air
Park in The County of Ches~erfield~ Virgini~ (the '~County"),
and the construction and equipping of a manufaaturing
facility thereon (th~ "Prcject'~)~ to be owned by the
Applicant and leased to Pohlig srethars, Ino.~ a virginia
Corporation under common control with the Applicant (the
specialty boxes~ and has held a public h~aring th~r~on on
Supervisors (th~ "Board'~} of the couuty of Chesterfield,
Virginia, to approve the issuance of the Bends to comply with
of Virqinia 11950), as amended (~he "Virginia Code"); and
W~tREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution
preliminarily approving the ~ssuance of the Bonds, upon te~ms
to be agreed upon by th= Aa%hori~y and the Company, a retard
of the public hearing and a "fiscal impact statement" with
r~spect ~e the Project have been filed with the Boa~d.
to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the
Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as
required by Section 15.1-1380 of the virginia Ceda~ the Bond~
be obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon or
or th~ Authority shall be pledged thereto.
~. The County Administrator is hereby muthorized to
&Dply on behalf of the County to the Virginia Department of
authority for the issuance uf %he Bonds pursuant to the
provision~ oZ Chap=~r ~.2 of Title 15,1 of 'the virginia
95-216 4112195
4. This resolution
upon it~ adoption.
Vote: Unanimous
shall take effective
immediately
8.C.l.b. REQC~NIZING APRIL 23-29, 1995 AE "VOLU}~TEER
A~PRE¢IATION W~K"
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
~dopted the fellowinq resolution:
WI~EREAS, volunteers lead the co,unity in showing a
genuine sslf-saorificin~ spirit ~ha~ benefits countless
individuals; and
WHEREAS, volunteering is recognized as an integral part
of ~overnment and industry in contributing to the
achievements that enhamce o~r nation; and
WHEREAS, volunteers work together to enable us tO meet
WHeReAS, volunteers in Chesterfield County willingly
give thouoando of hours of dedicated service~ and
WHEREAS, volunteers shew e pereenal interest in th~
above their own; and
WHEREA$~ volunteers have contributed significantly to
the quality of lifo in the County, Commonwealth, and Nation.
County Beard of Supervisors ~ecognize$ April ~-29, 19~B as
"Voluntemr Ap~rscla~icn Week" in Chesterfield county and
~rges all citizens to honor volunteers for their
contributions =o ~e county.
vote: unanimous
8.C.l.c. RECOGNI~iN~ MR. NICK PRONKO FOR HIS PROFESSIONAL
BBRVIOE TO CHESTBRPIELD COUNTY AS A REPORTER PeR
THE
On motion of ~r. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, tho
adopted the following resolution~
WHEREAS, ~r. NiO~ Pronko, Chesterfield County beat
reporter for the Progress-Index Newspaper, eov~d ~he County
for seven ~enthB; and
WHEREAS~ Drier to that~ Mr. Pr~nk~ worked for the
newspaper un the close-Up s~aff; and
WHEREAS, ~r. Pron~e~e reportiBg Was characterized by
fair and objective treatment of Chesterfield CouDty
and
WHEREAS, Hr. Pronto was extremely prolific in hie
reporting, writing about tho full range of Chesterfield
CoUnty activities and issues, providing many zouthern County
residents with a steady flow of timely articles; and
~EREAS, ~r. Pronko has been hire~ by Corry Publishing
to write for their Business Systeme Magazine in Erie,
Pennsylvania; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Prenko~s professionalisms spirit of
fairness, and unbiased objectivity in reporting on is~m~ of
interest to the community will De missed.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisor~ co~mend~ Hr. Nick Pronto on his
profe~sionalis~ and diligence aL a reporter for the Progress-
Index and wishes him success and happiness in his future
FUND PROJECTS
On ~otion of ~. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
Development Schedule; authorized the County Administrator to
enter into virginia ~apartmant cf Transportation
(VDOT)/County/ consultant/contractor design, right-of way
acquisition, and/or construction agreements~ acceptable to
the County Attorney; and adopted the f~llowlng resolution:
WHEREAS, Section 33.1-75 of the Cod~ of Virginia p~r~it~
the Commonwealth Transportation Board to make an equivalent
governlnq body of up ~a 25 percent or $50Q,000 whichever i~
greater of ~und~ received ~y it durin~ the ourren~ fiscal
year pursuant to the "State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act
of 1972~ for use by the Commonwealth Transportation Board to
construct, maintain, or improve primary and secondary highway
systems within such County; and
WHeReAS, the Chsmterfleld County Board of Supervisors
appropriated $500,00o for the Chesterfield Road Fund with the
adoption of the FY 1995-96 Appropriation Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, VDOT has nc=iliad the County that $500~00O is
the maximum amount of Chesterfield County funds that will be
matuhed by =ha State during FY 1995--96.
ROW, THEPEFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors he~ appropriated $~00,000 to be
ma~he~ Dy the State for ~he FY 1995 96 Chesterfield Road
Fund, formerly Revenue Sharing Program.
AND, B~ tT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the matched fund~ be
$354,680 Centre Street Ewtens~on from Chester Read to
Route 10 ($177,340 VDOT and $177,340 County)
$103,480 Forest Kill kvmnua f~$~ Huguenot Road to the
Richmond City Limits
Con~truction ($~1,740 VDOT and $51,740 County)
$541,840 HopkinsRoad from Inca Drive to Falconway Lane
Preliminary engineering and construction
($~70,920 VBDT and $270,920 County)
Vote: Unanimous
95-218 4/12/95
AUTHORI~A~IO~ FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT TO APPL~ FOR
GRANTS
DRUG ENFORCEHENT
On motion of Nr. ~arber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Bea~d
approved a request for the Police Department to apply for two
f~eral grants which would provide funding for a tenporary~
tull-time position, overtime, operating funds, and equipment
for an undercover drug stin~ operation and street drug
interdiction pr~qra~.
OD motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
~pprov~d a r~qu~5% for the Police Department to apply for a
federal grant which would provide fundin~ for a portion of
the upgrade costs for the Radio Co~munioatlons System
currently in the FY96~2000 Capital I~prove~entm Program.
Vote: Unanimou~
~.C.4.a. CHESTER VILLA~ FESTIVAL
On motion of Mr. Bathe=, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
approved the transfer ef $4~000 from the Bermu~ District
Three Cent Road Fund to the Parka and Recreation Department
to pay for materials and e~p~n~s to assist with the third
annual Che~ar Villags Festival.
~.C.4.D. EOURT~DUS~ COMPLEX T-BALL BASEBALL FIELD
On motion cf Mr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
approved the transfer of $3,000 from the Clover Hill District
Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Dep~rtment
tc pay for f~ncing au~ back~op improvements ~u the
courthouse complex t-ball baseball field.
On motion of ~r. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
approved the transfer of $3,000 from the ~atoaca District
Three cent Road Fund to ~hs Parks and Recreation Department
to pay for materials and expense~ related to the Eppington
SDr~ng Open House.
Vots: Unanimous
On motion of ~r. Barber, s~cond~ by Dr~ ~i~holas, the Board
approved the transfer of $1,000 from the Dale District Three
Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to pay
for roof repairs at Eppi~gtOn Plantation Huuuu.
Vote: Unanimous
4112195
APP~OVD~L OF ~PPROPRIATIONS
DONATION FROH CHESTERFIELD ¥0UTH SOFTBALL
On motion of Hr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
appropriated $~,000 from the Chesterfield Youth Softball
Association to the Parks and Recreation Department operating
budget, which are proceeds from the 1994 USSSA Ten and Under
Slrls World Tournament, to provide site improvement~ to Bird
Athletic Complex.
Vote: Unanimuu~
HEALTH DEPARTN~T PUNDS FROM STATE OF VIR~INI~
FOK CONVERSION AND EXPANSION OF FILING SYSTEM
On motion of Hr. Barber, secondod Dy Dr. Nichola=, the Board
~ppropriak~d funds in th~ amount of $71,737 to the
Chesterfield County ~ealth Departman~ from the state
Virginia, which funds will be used for conversion and
~xpansion of the ~eat=h Department's filing
Vote: Un~nimsue
8.d.$.c. D~VEL0~MENT O~ CENTRAL ~RE~ 9Lk~ ~TUD¥
On motion of M~- ~arber, s~¢on4e~ by Dr. Nicholas, th~ Boar~
appropriated $~5,000 for additional teaks in conjunction with
development of the Central Area Plan. fit is noted a source
of funding for this request has not been identified, however,
staff will identify a source ~rior to the end of the current
fiscal year.)
Vote: Unanimsus
P~SPARATION OF RIVERFROMT ELAN AND AW~-~D 0F
CONTRACT TO L~RDN~R/KLEIN L~NDSC~PE A/~CHIT~CTS FOR
appropriated additional funds, up to $~4,000, to ~upplement
authorized the County Administrator ts e~scute a contract
sarvicau to conduc~ appropriate studies resultinq in a plan
and implementation strategy. (It is noted a source of
~un~ing for this request hes not been identified, however,
fiscal year.)
DONATION TO T~OM~8 DALE HIgH SCHOOL FOR CL~S OF
on motion of Hr. Barber, seconde~ by Dr. Nicholms, the Soard
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 199~r AS ~MENDED, BY
AMENDING AND ~EENACTIN~ SECTION 7.1-2 RELATING
On motion of ~r. Barber, ~eeonded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
set the date of May 10, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. ~or a public
hearing to conside~ an ordinance to amend the Code of the
County o~ chesterfield, 197~, as amended, by amending and
~eenaeting Section 7.1-~ r~lating to preoinot boundaries and
Dolling places.
8.C.?.bo TO CONSIDER A/~ ORDINANCE TO ~END THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF CHEBTER~IE~,D~, 1978, A~ ~MEND~D, BY
County of chesterfield, 197~, as amended, by a~nding and
hearing to consider the Route ~60 Corridor Plan and rela~sd
zoning ordinance amendm~ntm.
Vote: Unanimous
~.C.9. AMENDMENT TO MINUTE~
On motion of Mr. Rarb~r, seconded by Dr. Nicholas~ the Board
amended the minutes ~ January 11, 1995 as follow~:
"Thi~ dry the Go~nty Environmental Engineer, in accordance
with directions from this ~oard, made report' in wr±t-ing'upen'
his examination of the roads in Mayfair Estates, Section G, a
portion of ~ayfair ~otate$, Section C, and a portion of
~ayfair Estate~, Section F, Dale District, and
Whereas, the Resident Enginemr for the Virginia D~partmsnt of
Transportation ~as advised ~he Director of Environmental
Engineering~ th~ street~ i~ Mayfair Estates, Section G, a
portion of Mayfalr Estatem~ S~ntian C, and a portion of
Mayfair Estates, Section F, Dale District, meets the
requirements established by the Subdivision Street
95-221 4/i2/95
Re~ulramenta of the Virginia Department of Transportation,
and
~nereas, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in
Deed Book 2453~ Page 405, January 21~ 1994, for all
stormwater detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
Barber, seconded by Dr- Nicholas, it is resolved that the
Estates, Section d, and a portion of Mayfair Estates, Section
F, Dale District, be and they hereby are established
public roads-
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant ts Section ~3.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and ~he Department's Subdivision Street
Reguiraments, the following:
Name of Street: Lam~ay Road ~eng~h: 0.~7 mile
From: the end of Route 4540
TO; the intersection cZ Route
~uaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50' feet.
Name of Street: Sharonridge Drive Length: 0.17 mile
From: the intersection of Lumlay Drive
To: th~ cul-de-sac
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50~ feet.
Name of Street; Marylou Lane Lenqth: 0.09 mile
To: the intersection of Sharonridge Drive
~uaranteed Right-of-Way Width: B0~ feet.
This request is inclusiv~ uf th~ adja=ent slope, sight
distanse~ clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements indicated on the
development plat.
These roads serve ~4 lots.
These sections of Mayfair Estates are recorded as follows:
Section G. Plat Book 7~ Page 7~ 3uly 15~
Section C. Plat Book 28, Page 3~, May 2, 1977.
Section F. Plat Book 68, Page 2~, September 2~,
Vote: Unanimous"
TO:
"This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance
wi~h directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
his examination of the roads in Mayfair E~tates, Section G, a
portion of Mayfair Estatss, section C, and a portion
Mayfair Eutateu, Section F, Dale District, and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has a~visad the Director e~ znvironmental
Engineering, the streets in Way,air ~state~ Bastion G, a
portion of May£air ~states, S~otion C, and a portion 'o~
Mayfair Estates, Section ~ Dale District, ~eet~ the
requirements established by the Sub~ivlsion Street
Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation,
and
%rnerees, the County and the virginia D~partment of
T~anspo~tation have entered into an a~rsement, recorded in
Deed Book 2453, Rage 405, January 21, 1994, for all
stormwater detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of ~[r.
Barber, seconded by Dr. N~cholas, it ia resolved that tho
readz in Ms,fair Estates, Section G, a portion of Mayfair
Estates, seotion C, and a portion of Mayfair Estate~, Section
F, Dale District, be and they hereby are established as
public roads,
And be it further re,diVed, that the Virqinia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into th~
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-2~g, Code of
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street
Requirements~ ~he following:
Name of Street~ L~mlay Road Length: 0.17 mile
Fro~: the end o~ Koute 4540
To: the intersection of Route 2081
~uarante~d Right-of-way Wi~: 5O' feet.
Name of street: sharenridge Drive Length: 0.17 mile
TO: the cul-de-sac
Guaranteed Right sf~Wmy Width: 50' feet.
Name of Street: Marylou Lane Length: 0.o9 mile
Thi~ request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight
development plat.
~hese sections of Mayfair Estates are rsoer~ed as follows;
with directions from this ~oard, made report in writing upon
psrt~on of Iron,ate, Section 1, Dal~ District, and
Wh®reas, the Resident £nqineer for the virginia Department of
r~quir~ment$ es%ablisbe~ by the Subdivision $~reet
stormwater detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of
Barber, ueconded by Dr. Nicholas, it is resolved that the
roads in Irongate, Section 5, and a portion of Irongate,
Section 1, Dal~ District, b~ and they hereby are established
as public roads.
And be it further resolved, ~ha~ the virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 3~.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and the Department's subdivision street
Requirementu, the following:
Name of Street: Cabin Mill Road Length: 0.12 mile
rrom: the intersection with Irongats Drive, State Route 3025
To: the intersection with Bryanbell Drive
Guaranteed Right-of-Way width: 50~ feet.
Name of Street: Bryanball Drivs Length: 0.31 mile
From: existing Bryanbell Drive, State Route 3031
To: the cul-de-sac
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50' feet.
Name of Street: ~ryanbell Terrace Length: 0.12 mite
from: ~he in=erssotion with Brya~bell
To: the cul-de-sac
Guaranteed Right-of-way Width: 50~ feet.
Name of Street: Aqaln, Bryan~all Terrace Length: 0.07 mile
From: th~ int~eCtio~ with Sry~nb¢ll Drive
To: the end of the road
Guarant~ed ~igh~-of-Way Width: 50~ feet.
Name of ~treet: Iron Ore Way Length: 0.04 mile
From: the intermsction with Bryanbell Terrace
To: the cul-de-sac
Guaranteed Right-of-way Width: 50' feet.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight
distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage ~asement~ in~i¢~te~ Qn
development plat.
These roads serve 56 lots.
These sections of Irongate are recorded as follows:
Section ~. Plat Book 78, Page 77~ July 17, 1992.
Section 1. Plat Book 36, Pege~ 3~ 39 & ~Or July 19, 1980-
Vets: Unanimous"
"This day the County Environmental Engineer~ in accordance
with direction~ from thin Board, ~ade report in writing upon
his examination of the roads ~n Irengate, Section 5, and a
portion of Irongate, Sec%ion t, Dale District, and
9~h~reas, the Resident Engineer fo=the Virginia. uepa=tment of
Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental
Rngin~ering, the streets in Irongate, S~etion 0,
Dertion of Ironqate, Section 1, Dale District, ~est~ the
requirements ~stablished by the Subdivision
Recuimements of the Virginia DeDartment of Transportation,
and
95-224 4/12/95
Whereas, the County and tbs Virginia Department of
Transportatiun have entered into an agreement, recorded in
Deed BOO~ 2453~ Pag~ 405, January 2%, 199~, for all
star.water datention/retentlun facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas~ it is resolved that the
road~ in Trongat~, S~ction ~ z~d ~ portio~ O~ Irongate,
Seotlon 1, Dale District, be and they hsrsby are established
as 9ublio roads.
An~ be it £urther resolved, that the Virginia Oegartment of
T~&nspo~tation. be and is h~reby requested to ~ake into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Cods of
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street
Requirements, the following:
Name of Street: Cabin Mill Road Length: 9.!2 mil~
From: the intersection with Irongahe Driv8, State Route ~0~
To: the intersection with Sryanbell Orlve
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50' feet.
~ame o£ ~tree%: Bryanbell Drive Length: O.31 ~ile
From: existing Bryanbell Drive. State Rou~s 3031
TO: the out-de-sac
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 5OI feet.
From: the intersection with Bryanbell Drive
From: the iht=reaction with Bryanbell Terrac=
distance~ clear zene an~ dealgnatad Virginia Department of
development plat,
These seotions Of Ironga%e are recorded as follows:
8.~.~0. ROAD NAME CHANGE
On motion cf Hr. ~arber, ~ecundad by Dr. Nichclau, ~he ~oar~
changed the name of "South Boones Trail Read", fro< the
li~itm of Jacobs Glenn Sub~ivision~ Section A~ to the
intersection with 3acobs Ridge Court, to "Jacobs Bend Drays".
Vote: Unanimous
95-225 4/12/95
Thi~ d~y the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance
his examination of the road in Chippendale, Dale District,
the requirements ee=ablis~e~ by the subdivision
Whereas, the County and the Virginia Department of
stormwater det~ntion~retention facilities in the County-
road in Chippeudale, Dal~ bi,Prior, be and it hereby is
And b~ it further re~olved! that the Virginia Department of
Virginia, and the Department's subdivision Street
Eequirements~ t~e following:
(Route
To: the cul-de-sac
diztance, clear zone and designated virginia Department of
development plat.
This road serve~ am access to commercial properties.
chippendale is recorded as follows:
This day the County Environmental ~nqin~er, in auoor~a~¢e
wit~ directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
his examination of the roads in ~adowbrook Farm, ~e¢~ie~ E,
Dale D~tr~ct, and
Wharea~, the Resident Engineer for the virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the Director of ~nvironmental
Engineering, the str~ts in Meadowbrnok Farm, Section E~ Dale
District, meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision ~reet Requirements of ~he Virginia Department of
Transpertation, and
stormwate~ detention/retention facilities in the County.
4/12/95
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, it is re~olved that the
roads in M~adowbrook Farm, Section E, Dale District, be and
they hereby are establiehed as public roads.
And be it further re~elvad, that the Virginia O~partmen% of
Tr&n~pc~a%icn, ~e and is here~y requested ~o take ~nte the
Secondary System, pursuant to section 33.1-~, Code o~
Vlr~inia, and th~ Department's Subdivision Street
Requirements, the following:
Name of Street: Country Manor Lane Length: 0.09 mile
From: intereeotioA of Country ~anor Lane,
Route 45~0, and South Melbeck Read,
Route 2118
To: end of road, 0,09 mile wes~ ef Route 4560
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 60' feet.
Name of Street: South Melbeok Road Length: 0.1~ mile
From: intersection ~f Rout~ 4~o a~d
Route 2118
To: temporary cul-de-sac, 0.~O mile south
of Route 2118
~uaranteed Right-of-Way width: 50~ Eeet.
~ame ef Street: Melbeck Terrace Length: 0.06 mile
Fiom: South Melb@ck Road~ 0.0a mile ~outh
cf Reut~ 45~Q
permanent cul-de-Sac, 0.06 mile west
of South ~elbeck Road
Guaranteed Right-of=Way width: 40' feet.
Namm of Street: Victoria Park Turraoe Length: 0.11 mile
From: Country ~ancr Lane, O.09 mile we~t
of Route 2118
To: permanent cul-de-sac, 0.11 mile north
of Country M~nor Lane
Guarentee~ Right-of-Way width: 5o' feet,
This requemt ie inolusive of the adjacent slope, ~ight
distance, clear zone and designated virginia Department of
TranmDertatien drainage easements indicated on the
development plat.
These roads serve ~7 lo~s.
This Section of Meadcwbrook Farm is recorded ac follows:
Section E. Plat Book ~3, Pages 6 & 7, January 3, 1994.
Vote: Unanimous
This day t~e County Environmental ~ngi~eer~ in accordance
with directions from this ~osrd, made report in writing upon
his exumination of the roads in Salem Estates, Section 3 and
a Dertien of Bre~twood, Section A~ Dale District, and
Whereae~ the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department ef
Transportation has advised' the Director of Environms~=a~
Engineering, the streets in Salem Estates, Section ~ and a
portion ef ~rentwood, s~etion A, Dale Die=riot, m~et the
requirements established by the Subdiviuion Street
Requirements of th~ ~irginia Depar=ment ex Transportation,
Wherea~, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered ~n=o an agreement, recorded in
Deed Book 245~, Page 405, January 21, 1994, for ell
stormwater detention/retention facilities in the County.
95-22? 4/1~/95
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
roads in Salem Estates, Suction 3 and a portion cf Brontwood,
Section A, Dale District, be and they hereby are established
as public ~oads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virgln±a Department of
Transportation, he and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary Sygtem~ pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and the ~eparbment'e Subdivision Street
Requirements, the following:
Name of Street: Belfield Rc~d Length: 0.13 mile
From: 0.13 milo south from tho intersection
with State Route 1845, Belfield Road,
and State Route 307~, Black oak Road
To: tho temporary turnaround
Guaranteed Eight-of-Way widtk: ~0' feet.
Name of S~ree~: Rockfield Road Length: 0.07 mile
and extends 0.07 mile
e~st from the intersection with
This reguost is inclusive of th~ adjacent slope, sight
distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements indicated on th~
This suction of Salem EStates is recorded as follows:
Section 3. Plat Book 63, Pagu ll~ Septumbur 20, 1988.
vote: Unanimeum
This day the County Environmental ~ngin~er~ in accordanc~
with directions ~rom ~his Soard, made report in writing upon
hi~ m~amination of the rcad~ in Salem Estates, Section
Dale Diehrict, an~
Whereas, the Regiment Engineer for t~ha Virginia D~part~ont of
Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental
Engineering, the streets in Salem Estate~, S~ct~on 4, ~ale
District, meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Recuirsmsnts of the virginia Department of
Transportation, and
W~ereas, the County and thc Virginia D~partment of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, r~corded in
Deed BOOR 2453, Rage 405~ January El, 1994, for
stermwa~er detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration ~he~ee~, and on motion ~f Mr.
Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, it is resolved that the
roa~e in Salem Estates, ~eetion 4, Dale District, b~ and they
hereby are established as public road~.
And be it further resolved~ that the Virginia' 5apartment
Transportation, be an~ is hereby requsstud to take into the
Secondary Systen, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Coda of
Virginia, and the Department's ~ubdivi$ion street
Requirements, the following:
Name of STreet: Reckfield Road Length: 0.15
Prom: Rockfle~d Road, 0_09 mile east of
Belfield Road
end 0£ permanent cul-de-sac, 0.15 mile
east of Rockfield Road
Guaranteed Riqht-o£-Way Width: 59' feet.
Name of Straat~ Upton goad Length: 0.02 mile
From: Rockfield Read, 0.15 mile east of
Belfield goad
To: end of road, 0.02 mile south of
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50' feet.
This request im inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight
distance~ clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements indicated on
These ~oads serve 22
Sestton 4. Plat Book 65~ Page Zo~ February 14,
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance
with directions from this Board, ma~e repor~ in writing
his e×aminaT~on of the road~ in Bellgrade Plantation,
~idlo~hlan District, and
Wheress, the Resident ~ngineer for the Virginia Dmpartment of
Transportation has advised The Direotor of Environmental
Engineering, the street~ in Bellgrade Plant=tion, aidlothian
District, meet the requirements established by
Subdivision Street Rgquirements of the Virginia Department Of
Transportation, and
Whereas, the county and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, rsosrde~ in
Dead Book 2459, Page 405~ January 21, 1994, for all
stormwater detantlon/reten~ien facilities in the County.
Barber, seconded by Dr~ Nichslas~ it is re~ol~ed that the
roads in Bellg~a~ Plantation, Midlothian District, ba
they hereby are established as public
And be it further resolved, t~at the Virginia D~partm~nt Of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested te take into The
Secondary System~ pursuant to Suction 33.1-~19, Code of
Virginia, and ~ha Department's Subdivision street
Requirements, t~e following:
Na~e of STreet: Polo Parkway Length: Q.?7
From: the intmrsection with Ra~iou~ Road~
State Route 711
the intersection with ~ugueno~ Road,
State Route 147
Guaranteed Right-of-Way of variable Width: 60 - 210' feet.
From: the int~rneetien with Euguenot Road,
State Route 147
95-229 4/12/95
To: the intersection with Polo Parkway
Guaranteed Right-of-Way of Variable Width: 60 210' feet.
This request is incluslv~ cf the adjacent ~lope, sight
distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements indicated en the
development plat_
Bellgrade Plantation is recorded as follows:
Plat Book 72, Pages 7R, 79 & 80, August 23, 1990.
This day tbs County Environmental Engineer, in aceordanoe
with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon
his examination of the roads in O~erdale, Seoticn E,
Midlothian ~istrict, and
Whereas, the ReEident Engineer for the Virginia D~part~ent of
Transportation has advised the Director of Envlron~ental
Engineering, th~ ~tr~ts in Otterdale, sectio~ F, widl~thian
District, meet the r~quirements established, by the
~ubdivi~ion ~treet Requirements of %he Virginia Deportment of
Transportation, and
Wherea~ the County and the virginia Department of
Transportotion have entered into an agreement, recorded in
Deed Book 2459, Pa~e 4G5, January 21~ 199~ for all
s~ormwater detention/retention facilities in the Ceunty.
Therefore, upon consideration wher~o£, Dad en ~etlon of
Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, it is ~esolved that the
roads in ottardala, Section E, Midlothian Dis=riot, be and
they hereby a~e established ~s public roads.
And be it further re~olved~ that the Virginia Department of
TransportaLion, be an~ is hereby requested to tak~ into th~
Secondary System, pursuant to Section ~.1-229, Code of
virginia, and the Dspartn~nt's Subdivision 8treat
Requirements, the following:
Name of Street: Aldengate Road Length: 0.08 mile
From: $~sts Routs 1Q54
To: the tempurary cul-de-sac
Guaranteed Right-cf-Way W~dth: S0~ feet.
Name of Street: Aldengste Terrace Length: 0.16
From: the intersection with Aldengate Road
To: the cul-de-sac
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: ~O' ~eet.
Th/~ r~qu~t is inclusiv~ of the adjaoen~ slope, sight
distance, clear zone and designated Virgini~ Department of
Transportation drainage easements indio~ted on the
development plat.
T~is section o~ Otterdsla is raoorde~ as follows:
Oeotion E. Plat SOOk 76, Page 57, September 20, 1991.
Vote: Unonlmous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, ~n accordance
with directions frQmthis Board, made report in writing upon
his examination of th~ road in salisbury, Hatfiald, Phase IV,
Midlothian District, and
Whereas, the R~sident ~ngineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the Director of ~nvironmental
~ngXneering, the street in Salisbury, 5atfiel~, Phase IV,
Midlothian District, meet~ th~ requirements establish@d by
the Subdivision Str~t Reuuirements ~f th~ Virginia
Department of Transportation, and
Whereas, the County and the Virginia D~partment of
Transportation have entered into a~ agree~en=~ recorded in
Deed Book 2453, Page 405, January ~1, 1994, for all
e~ormwater detention/retention fasilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on motion of
Barber, seconded by Dr. ~ich01as~ it is reuolvsd that the
road in Salisbury, Hatfield, Phase IV, Midlothian District,
be and it hereby is establlsh~d a~ a p~blic road.
And be it further r~sol~d, that ~he Virginia Departmen~ of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street
Requlrum~nt~, tho following:
Name of Street: Earburn Court Length: O.10 mile
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50~ feet.
d~tance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
This phase of Salisbury, Watfield is recorded as follows:
This day the County EnVironmental Engineer, in accordance
with ~irections from this Board, mad~ re~ort in writing upon
his exami~atio~ of the roads in Walton Park, Section T,
~idlothian District, and
Whereas, the ~ssid~nt =n~ine~r for the V~rginia Department of
Transportat~oa ha~ advised the Director of ~nvironmeetal
~ngineering, ~he streets in Walton Park, Section
Midlothian District, meet th~ requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the virginia Dspartment of
Transportation, and
Whereas, the County an4 the Virginia Department of
Transportation h~va entered into an agreement, ~eoo~ded in
Deed Book R453, Pag~ 40~, Jasuary 21, 1994, for all
stcrmwater detention/retention facilities ih the County.
Therefore~ upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr.
Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, it ~e resolved that the
roads in Walton P=~k, Section T, ~idlothian District, be and
they hereby are established as public roads.
And bm it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
Virginia, and th~ Departmsnt's Subdi¥i~ion Street
Requirements, the £ellowing:
~am~ of Strest: walton Ridge Lane Length: 0.1S mile
From: Walton Bluff Parkway (Route
0.12 mile mouth of Queensgate Road
To: Route 4146, 0.18 mile east of Route 3750
Name of Street: Seabright Terrace Length~ 0.08 mile
From: Queen,gate Road (Route 1385),
mile east of Walton Bluff Parkway
(Route 3750)
To; end of permanent cul-de-sac, 0.08
mile south of Route 1385
~ame o~ Street: Grady Hill Place Length: 0.O~ mile
From: Queen~at~ Read (Route 1385), 0.09
mile east of Walton Bluff Parkway
(Routu 3750)
mile south of Route 1385
Guaranteed Right-of-way width: 50' ~eet.
This reques~ is inclusive of the a~jaoent slope, eight
distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements indicated On the
development plat.
These roads serve 38 lots.
Thi~ section of Wa]ton Park is r~corded ~s follows:
Section T. Plat Book 76, Page 14. June 21, 1993.
8.C~12. REOUE$~ FOR PERMI$SIO~ FROR HIGHLANDS GOLFER'S
DRIVE
On ~otio~ Of Mr. Barber~ seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
approved a request from Highlands Golfer's Club Limited
Part~er~hi~ to e×t~nd a private water ~ervice within a
propeme~ right-of-way for Highland Glen Drive to serve a golf
clubhouse on Tax Map Number 1]0-00-01-00-0D0-130, subject to
the execution and recordation o~ an agreement acceptahle to
the County Attorney. (It is Doted a copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: U~ani~oue
On motion of Mr. Barber, s~c0nded by Or, ~ichela~, the ~oard
Administrator to execute a ~uitclaim deed to vacate a 20 fcc~
drainage easement acroms the property of Sturbridge Village
Tow~house A~socia~icn. (I~ is noted a copy oS the vicinity
sketch ~s filed with the papers of this Board.)
95-232 ~/12/95
~.~.14. ~PPROV~L 0B UT~LITI=~ ~ONT~AET EOR LIPP~NGHA~!
approved a utilities con~ract for LiDpin~ha~, section 1~
Contract Number 94-0152, as follows~ which project includes
the e~tenaion cf 35~.44 L.F. plus or minus of 16 ins~ waste
Total ~timated County C05%
Wa~tewater (Over~izing] $ 5,076.85
(Refund thru connections)
Estimated Developer Cost $155,39s.99
Code: (Oversizing) 5~-572VO-E4C
Diutrict: Matoaca
Vote: Unanimous
HUILDiNG
~ motio~ of Mr. Barber~ seconded by Dr. Nicholas, th~ Board
authorized th~ Chairman of the Board and the County
Adm±ni~trator to execute an easement agreement with
Commonwealth Gas Services, Incorporated, %0 in,tall a ~s
service to serve the Chesterfield County School Board
Adminietretien ~uildin~. (~t is noted a cody of ~he vicinity
~ketch i~ filed ~ith the papers of this Beard.)
Vote: Unanimous
8.C.15.b. MONACA~ HIGH
On motion of Hr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Richola~ the ~o~rd
~uthorlzed the Chairm~n of th~ Board and th~ County
Administrator to ~ecu%e ~n ea~emen~ agreement with
Commonwealtk Gas Services, Incorporated, to install a
service to eerve ~onacan Bigh ~ch~el. (I~ ~ noted a ~oDy of
the vicinity sketch is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
POWER OOMP~h~'f T~R NEW E~ON/F~%RROWG~T~ R~LI~V~
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
On ~otion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Ee~rd
auLhorized the Cheirmen of the Board and the County
Administrator t~ execute an easement aqreement with virginia
Electric and Power Company for underground service to th~ new
Enon/Harrowqate Reliever Elementary School. (It is noted a
copy of the plat is filed wi~h the papers of this Board.)
Unanimous
S.C.17. ACCEPTANCES OF PARCELS OF LA~D
8-C.AT-a, ~T~NDI~G SOUTHERLY FRO~ INT~RS~OTION OF CH2%RT~R
accepted, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a parcel
intersection of Charter Colony Parkway and worth Woclridge
copy of ~he plat is filed with the papers of this Bon~d.)
8.C.17.b. ALONG CNURCK ROAD FROM MR. G~RL;%ND E. MOSE ~
on motion of Mr. Bar~sr, ~scnnd~d by Dr. Ni~holas~ the Bnar~
accepted, on behalf of the County, th~ conveyance of a parent
of land con~aining 0.~4S acres along Church Road (State Route
669) from Kr. Garland ~. Moms and ~. Dorothy ~. Mos~ and
authorized the County Administrator to e~eoute the necessary
deed. (It ~ noted a copy of the plat i~ filed with the
papers of this Bnard.)
~EFER TO PLANNING ¢0~MISSION THE D'~VELOPMEI~T ~
REVIEW OF A SUBDIVISION ORDINANOE AKENDMENT TO
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS
On motion of ~r. Barbsr, ~ecn~ded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
referred to the Planning Co~iasion the deYalopmsnt and
review of a subdivision ordinance a~eDt to ~rovi~
notification ~o adjacen~ property ownsr~ of tentative
subdivision applications.
vote: unanimous
There were no Hearings of citizenm on Unscheduled Mat~ers or
Claims scheduled.
On motion of ~r. Barber, ~econded by Dr- Nicholas, the Board
accepted the following reports:
Capit~l ~rojects; District Road and Street Light Funds; ~ease
li.A. E~CUTIVE SESSION ~URSU~NT TO SECTION 2.~-344A.7.,
OF VIRGINIA, 19E0. AS AMENDED. FOR CO~SULTATION ~I~H
L~G~ COUN~L R~LATIN~ TO AOTUAL LITIGATION I~OLVING
T~E ACTIONS aP CEETAIN ~OLICE OFFICERS
4/12/95
CODE O~ VIRGINIA,'FOR CONSULTATION WIT~ LE~L COUNSEL
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Hr. McH~te, the Board
wont into ~xeoutive Session Pursuant to Section 2.1-344A.7.,
Code Of virqinia, 1920, as Amended, for Consultation with
Legal Counsel Relating to Actual Litigation Involving the
Action~ of Certain Police offic~re and P~rs~ant to Section
2.1-344.A.7., Code of virqinis, for consultation with Legal
Couns%l R~qardinq Actual Litigation Relating to the
Enforcement of the Uniform Statewido Suildin~ Code.
Veto: Unanimous
O~ ~otic~ Of Mr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
adopted the following rmsulution:
W~R~A$~ tAs Soard of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Executiv~ Sea,ion in accordanc~ with a formal vote of
the ~oard and in accordance with the ~rsvi~iono of the
Vi~qinia Freadom of Information ACT; and
WHEREAS, t~ Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effactive July I, 1989 provides for certification that ouch
E~cu~iva S~ion was conducted in conformity with law.
does hereby certify that to th~ be~t of esch me~ber~
knowledge, i) only public bu~iDes$ matters lawfully exempted
which this certification ~pplie0, and
dissents from this certification.
The Soard being polled~ th~ vote was as follows:
Dr. Nicholas: Aye.
Kr. McKale: Aye.
1~. DINNER
O~ ~otio~ Of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
recessed tc ~he Administration Building, Room 582, for
dinner.
Vote: Unanimous
95-235 4/12/95
fg. XNVOOA~ION
Reverend Ralph Goodman, Pa~tor of Providene~ United Methodist
Church, gave the invocation.
;~M~RICA
The YMCA Apache Indian Guides Tribe led the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag of the United States sf America.
Mr. McSale recognized ~embers of the Blackfoot India~ G~ides
Tribe who were also present at the meeting.
RECOSNIZIN~ CHESTER VILLAGE FESTIVAL CO~ITTEE FOR
THEIR OUT~TA/~DING SERVICE TO THE 1995 CHESTER VILLAGE
FESTIVAL
Mr~ Golden introduced W~- Kathryn Daniels-Smith, Wt. Scott
Mevener, Mr. Jeff Cart, Ms. Ea~sy Mall, and members o£ the
Chester Village Festival Committee, who were present to
receive the resolution.
On motion o~ ~he ~eard, %he following re~olu=ion wa~ adosted=
WHEREAS, ~he Central Chesterfield Business Association
and Chesterfield County are co-sponsoring the third annual
chester Village Festival; and
WHEREAS, the Festival is designed to pro,ore the
W~BREAS, the Festival i~ provided free to the citizens
of Chesterfield County through generous donations by the
WHEREAS, the Festival will be held May 13, 199D, the
Saturday before Mother's Day; and
WHEREAS, ~any activities will b~ provided during the day
to include hands-on childrens' activities, entertainment,
arts and craftm, and conce~ion~.
NOW, T~R~FOR~ B~ IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County soard oX supervisors here~y reo0gnizes the following
individuals for their hard work amd dedication to the Chester
village Eestivel an~ recognizes May 13, 1995 as e day to
celebrate the rich heritage of dow~tuwu Chester:
Kathryn Daniels-S~ith, Cha~l~man
Scott Hevener, Vice-Chalrm~n
Martha Goodloe B~¢hana~, Treasurer
Jeff Cart, Sponsorship Director
Bonnie Sorak, Sponsorship Director
D. Scott Fisher, Entertainment Director
Pam Cteckner, Art~ and Crafts Director
Kate~ Mall, Parks and Recreation
Vote: Unanimous
~r. WcHale presente~ ~he e~eouted resolutions to Ms. Daniels-
S~ith, Mr,, Hevenar, Mr. Curt, and Ms. Mall~ and e×pressed
appreciation for their efforts in implementing ~he third
annual Chester Village Festival.
Mr. Hev~ner expressed appreciation for the recognition and
'invi~eO everyone to attend the Festival on Nay 13.
15. R~BOLUTION$ AND S~ECIAL KEGOGNITIO~B
15.A. R~OOGNIZING ~OY ~COUT$ UPON ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE
SCOUTS
On motion of the Board, the following resolution uae adopted:
WHEREAS, t~e Boy Seo~ts of AmeriCa was incorpora£ed by
Mr. william D. Boyoe on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to
pueme~e citizenship training, personal development, and
fitness of individuals; and
in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position
in a t~ocD, carrying out a service p~oject beneficial to his
community, being active in the Troop. ~emonstrating Scout
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
W~tEREAS, Mr. William David Freeman, Troop 891, sponsored
by Ben Air United Methodist C~uroh, has accempllshed those
h~gh ~tandard~ of commitment and ha~ r~aahed the l~ng-~ought
goal of Eagle Scout which is r~ceived by lem~ than two
percent of those individuals entering the Zcouting movement;
and
WHEREAS~ growing throug~ ~is experiences in Scouting,
l~arning the ~ssous of responsible citizenship, and priding
h~mself on the ~reat accomplishment~ of ~i~ County, William
i= indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young
County Beard of Supervisors hereby extends its
the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding
Vote: Unanimous
Nr. B~rbar presented the executed resolution to ~r. Free,an,
aGeempanied by members eX hie family, and oongratulated him
on his outstanding achievement.
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WKEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was inaorporated by
WKERBAS, the Boy Scouts of America ~as founded to
promote citizenship training, personal development, and
fitness of individuals; and
WKEREA~, after earning at least twenty-one me,it badgeb
in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position
in a troop, oerrying out a service project beneficial to his
community, being aotive in the %roop~ demonstrating Scout
spirit, and living Up to the S~out Oath and Law; and
W~EREAS, Mr. Brian J. Jenkins, Troop S97, ~pon~ored by
Ncunt Pis~ah United Kethodia~ Church, has a~complished ~huse
high mtandards of commitment and has reached the long-sought
~eal of Eagle Scout which i~ received b~ less than two
percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement;
and
95-237 4/1~/95
WHEREAS, growing through his sxperiensss in Scouting,
learning the l~on~ of responsible citizenship, and pri~i~g
himself on the great accomplishments of his County, Brian
citizsns of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of supervisors hereby extends its
congratulations to Mr. Brian ~. ~enkins and acknowledges thc
good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young
man as one of its citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
accompanied by members of his family, and csnqratuletsd
on hi~ out,tending achicvement.
1¢.A.4. F~q. PHILIP W. MORRISSBTTB, IV, TROOP
On motion of the Board~ the followinq resolution was adopted~
~r. William b. Buyce on February ~, 19lQ; and
~MER~A$, the Soy Scouts of America was founded ts
fitness of individuals; and
W~EREAS, after earning at least twenty-one maria badges
in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership pcsition
in a troop, carrying ou~ a service 9~ojsst bsnsf~siat to
community, being active in the troop~ demonstrating Scout
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, ~r. Philip W. ~orrlssette, IV, Troop 859,
sponsored by Salisbury Presbyterian Ch~rch~ has
those high standards of csmmitment and ha~ reached the long-
sought goal of Eagl~ Scout ~hich is received by le~s than ~wo
percent of those individuals entsring the Scouting movement;
and
WHEREAS, growing.through his expsricnces in $ccu~ing,
learninq the lessons of responsible citizenship, and p~iding
himself on the gr~at accomplishments e~ his County, Philip is
indeed a ~ember of a new generation of prepared young
NOW~ T~R~0R~ ~ IT R~SOLVED, that %he Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors h~roby extends its
congratulat~on~ to M~_ Philip W. Morrissstte, IV and
acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an
outstanding young man as eno of its citizens.
Mr. Darber presented the executed re~sluticn ~o Mr.
congratulated him on his outstanding achievement.
(It is noted Mr. David L. French, ~rcop $~4, wan unable to be
present st the ~eeting at this
Mr. Stith introduced representatlv~s from James River and
Hidlethian High Schoelm who were present to receive the
re~olutions~
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adep%e~:
WHEREAS, the two highest risk nights ~or teens are
where alcohol and drugs ara available; and
WHEREAS, students need an alternative %0 dr~gs and
alcohol to w~ieh they Can and will ~ay "YES"; and
WHEREAS~ in 1994, over 350 schools and communities in
Virginia participaZed in operation ~rcm/Graduation's alcohol
and drug-free parties for students; and
WHEREAS, many parents of Jam~ River High School Juniors
and Midlothian High School Junior~ and Senior~, with
financial support from the local smd surrounding
community~ are working to prsvide alternativ~ "no alcohol or
~rug$" partie~ following =he James River High School Prom on
April 29~ 1995 and the gidlothian High School Prom on May 13,
WHEREAS, communities all over virginia are reaching in
e~cuu~agin~ them to 'lCslebrate Life'~.
County Board of ~up~rvi~or~ de~l~r~s th~ we~kend~ of April
Among the Teen end Adult Population of Chesterfield County."
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that adult~ be enuouraged
to provide a positive, no alcohol and drugs example for our
youth, particularly at the high risk times of prom and
save them.
and ~idlothian High Schools and expre=sed appreciation for
their effort~ in holding post prom parties.
15.D. REOO~NIZIN~ CHESTERFISLD YOUT~ SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION
Chesterfield Youth Ssftball Associa=ion, is unable ts be
present at the ~esting, however, he would accept the
resolution on her behalf.
on motion of the Soard, the following resolution wa~ adopted:
Department co-sponsors numerous youth and adult leagues,
pruvidin~ the ~acilitias necessary for their operation; and
consistently and diligently provided top ~uality recreational
~MER~AS, the Chesterfield Youth Softball Association
ho~ted tho USSSA' Ten and Under Girl~ World Tournament in
1994; and
WHEREAS, the Tournament provided an opportunity far 42
teams of young ladies to make new friends and enjoy the
benefits of competition; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Mildred Burretl, President of tho
Chesterfield Youth Softball Association, worked diligently
and actively, seeking ~uppert to provide the Tournament in
Ch~gt~rfi~ld County; and
W~R~AS, the Chesterfield Youth Softball Association has
generously offered $$,000 in proceeds from the Tournament to
the Chesterfield Parks and Recreation Department to provide
site improvements to L. C. Bird HigR SO, COl Athletic Complex,
~emaisting of ~rainage an4 infield improvements and du,-out
NOW, THA~REFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that tho CheBterfield
County Board of Supervisors commends and recognizes
Mildred BUrrell and the Chesterfield Youth Softball
Association for their ~edioated service to chesterfield
.County and its remidents.
Mr. Golden presented a check to the Board from the
ch~st~r£ield Youth Softball Association, in the
$8,000, to be u~ed fo~ imprsvemsnhs at Bird High School.
Mr. Barber presented the executed remolution to Mr. ~old~n,
who accepted on behalf of Ms, Burrell, and expressed
appreciation for the Association's efforts in hosting the
199~' U$$SA Ten and Under Girls World Tournament.
~DUeATI0~ WEEK"
Mr. Bammer introduced Ms_ Karla Dani¢l~ represen=in~ the
local chapter of Credit Prefessional~ International, who ~a~
present to rec~iv~ th~ r~solution-
On motion of the Board, th~ following resolution was adopte~:
WHEREAS, understanding the nature of credit, its cost,
and benefits is necessary if ou~ citizen~ are to r~alize the
full ben,fits of their income; and
WHZREAS, the dissemination of information re~ardJn~
credit will help inform consumers o~ their rights.
~OW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Deard of Supervisors hereby prasen%~ 2his resolution
bo CPI: Credit Professionals of Richmond, Virginia, in
recognition of "National Credit ~duoation week", April 24-39,
1995.
Va=e: Unanimou~
Mr. Barber pre,anted the executed reselutio~ to ~. Daniel
and expressed appreciation for her efforts in educating
individuals about the value of good credit.
MS. Daniel stated a letat chapter of the organization is
located in th~ city of Richmond, ~hat several conferences and
seminars are held each year ~o keep abrea~t of the changing
laws about credit, and expressed appraeiaticn for the
~ecognition.
95-240 4/12/95
Mr. Hamer introduced Ms. Patay W. Cuppln~, President of
receive the resalution.
~%qEREA$, professional secretaries are committed to
upholdin~ the hiqhest ethical and pro~e=6ionel judgement; and
W~R~A$, professional secretaries should be recognized
for their out~tanding aQntributions to business, education,
and government.
cscretarlea in o~£icea evsrywhere.
Mr, Barber presented the executed resolution to Ms. Coppins,
Ms. Coppina expressed appreciation for the recognition.
in the Commonwealth of Virginia, one being Virginia Tach, and
this year.
~L1-270~_2 ~H~Q~GH 21.1-270.15, AND SECTION 21.1-281
Mr. ~tith ~tated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearlnq to consider an ordinance relating to the
regulation of computer oentrclted variable message electronic
sig~9 by t~e County. He introduced Mr. Kirk Turner, Ptnnning
Administrator for the ~ianning Oepart~ent, be update the
Board on ~he status of t~e siqn ordinance.
Mr, T~ner stated a critical elument of the Plnnning
Commission's recommendation was based on information £rom the
Virginia Department of Transportation indicating that the
feu~ second interval in th~ curren~ ordinance would place
som~ signs in conflict with State re~ulations. He further
message cannot change more than once while visible to a given
mc~oriet traveling at th~ ~a~imu~ o~ mini~ posted speed.
He sba%ed after addreaaing many optiona, the Planning
commission recommended restriction of electronic signs as
95-241 4/11/95
Conditional U~ea in C-3, C-4, and C-5 areas. He further
stated the Planning Commission also adopted a policy which
the Commission will u~ in considering requests for
electronic men.age ~ign~. He indicated canc~rn~ hav~ bean
e×prsssed regarding the policy relating to electronic sign
Mr. Allen %~dedt stated he is in the sign busine~ 'and he
feels the County should net regulate the ti~e, but allow one
change ~n the sign m~ssage to a given motorist, based upon
about the conditional use p~oe~ss~ that ha f~ls Plan~ing
staff should handle the process on a case-by-case basis and
stated display ~ign~ increase sal~s for businesses. He
referenced a letter from the General Manager of Richmond
an electronic display sign and no,ed display signs ere safe
~ecause cf the signs,
ihearing was closed.
would have to be enumerated in the ordinance or whether they
display ~igns.
Com~i~sion'~ policy for eo~puter controlled varla~le message
electronic ~ign~ and ~implify the o~dinanee by stating the
~igns will be prohibited with a conditional use permit; that
message si~n shall display flashin~ or traveling messages or
incorporate b~jou lighting affects; that slestrenic message
signs shall be p~ohibited within village or historic
districts; and that lanquage be adopted to read "an on
legible to a given motorist travslin~ a= the maximum ar
minimum pasted speed."
Dr. Nicholas seconded the motion.
~he CQ=nty, two of whish are located in Midlo~hian District.
He fur%her stated he has never received a complaint about th~
signs; that the signs are exDsnsive~ and be feels the signs
and control over the signs.
are defined dif£srsntly, in =he ordinance.
Mr. Daniel stated he feels ~he conditional use keeps
everything under eont~ol apd atlow~ all factors to be
addressed, therefore, he can support the srdinance.
~_r. Warren sta~ed he feels the ordinance needs to be defined
95-242
use approach and the issue debated at the Planning commission
certain distriot~ or conditional uses and the Commission
recommended that the signs should hs sonditio~al uses. When
asked, he stated the 15 r~strictions developed by the
Planning Co~mission are not part of the proposed ordinance,
but are only to be u~ed as a ~uid~line for staff in making
recommendations on these types of requests.
Mr. McHals inquired as to whether the notion includes adding
those 15 restrictions to the ordinance.
Discussion, comments, and questions ensued relative to the
conditional use process allowing any of the restrictions to
be imposs~ durlng consldaratlon of th~ request and the
conditional use process eliminating the ne~d to enumerate the
restrictions in the zoning ordinance; the Board adoptin~ the
ordinance which would address issues oth~r than the policy
and not having the purview tc technically change or eliminate
the Planning Commission's policy~ but rather the Board
be in sync.
than the one ~rsviously adopted by the Planning commission~
the Planning Commls~ion wou~d be asked to go back and
reevaluate their policy accordingly.
Mr. MeHele offered a friendly &~e~d~ent to thc motion to
adopt the ordinance as presented; direct staff to go back to
the Planning Commission to address the concern~ that have
bean outlined~ and to brin~ back to the ~oard a policy
comsidera~ion- He stated he fsel~ the County should mot be
more restrictive than thm virginia Oepartmsnt of
Transportation.
Mr. Barber stated the ordinance has been under consideration
for am extended period o~ ~ime and al:hough =ne conditional
ue~ may not necessarily be what the industry wants, he feels
i= provides the safeguards when considering each case.
further stated he feels too many unnecessary restrictions are
bein~ pl.ased under th~ Planning Commission's racommend=~
policy and a substitute motion could be made to incorporate
=he Planning Commissisn's restrictions.
Dr. Nicholas Stated th~ County fs living in ah electronis age
and although certain restrictions are needed, they should not
sign located in Matoaca District and he hms not received any
complaints about th~ sign. He indicated he feels the Board
~hould not be too restrictive regarding the
Kr. Barber clarified that his motion includes adoption of the
ordinance as presented; adoption of a policy by the Board of
Supervisors that allows spacing between electronic signs
1,000 feet; that flashing, bi3ou, nnd "continuous traveling"
messages be prohibited; ~hat the messages shall not change
more frequently than once per viewing cycle; and that the
signs be prohibited in villages and historica~ distr~ctsu
Or. Nicholas in~icated ~is support of the marion.
~. ~icas clarified that =ks motion includes %he Planning
Commission considering adoption of th~ revised Board of
Supervisors policy.
95 24.3 4/12/95
........ I :1 r ] ' I: T ..........
Mr. ~cHale tailed for the voter on the motion made by Mr.
Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, for the Board to st~iRe the
Planning Commission's policy for computer e0n~ro~led variable
message electronic signs; direct the Planning Commission to
consider adopting the Board of Supervisors policy; and adept
a Bosrd of S~pervisors policy ~Qr such signs stating that
electronic message sign ~hall be located within 1,000 feet of
any other electronic message sign; that no electronic message
sign shall display flashing or travelin~ ~essaqes or
incorporate bijou lighting affects; that electronic message
signs shall be prohibited within village or historic
districts; and t~at =he me=sage or dieplsy on an electronic
me~age mign shall he programmed Or ~equenoed to change no
more than once while legible to a given motorist ~raveling at
%he maximum or minimum posted speed; and to adopt the
fellowin~ ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TEE CODE OF TEE
O~ CHeSTeRFIELD, 197@, AS A~END~O, BY A~NDING
SECTION ~1.1-~70.3 RELATING TO SIGNS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board Of Supervisors of
chesterfield County:
(1] Tha~ SesSion ~1-1-~0-~ of th~ Code of the County
of Cheste~fie~d~ 19~8, as &~ended~ is a~e~ded as follows:
sec. 21.1-27~.3. General
The following regulations apply to all signs and are ~n
addition to the regulations contained elsewhere in thi~
chapter.
{c) Prohibitsd Signs.
(3) Other Prohibited Signs,
oeo
d. Any flashing si~n displaying flashing sr
intermittent li~hts~ lights of changing
degre~ ~f intensity or change or
message, except for those displaying
tim~, dat~ and temperature.
I~) That this ordinanc~ ~hall become effective
i~tt~ediately upon adoption.
And~ further, the Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
0~ C~ESTERFI~LD, 1978, AS A~DND~D, BY A~NDING
AND REENACTING SECTION 21.1-162 RELATING TO
CONDITIONAL USES IN T~D C-~ DISTRICT
BE IT ORDAIK~D by the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County:
(1) That Section ~1.1-162 of the Code of the County of
Chssterfield, ~97B, as amended, is amended and reenacted to
reed as follows:
Sec, 21,1-16~. conditional uses,
95-~44 ~/12/~5
The following uses may be allowed Dy son~itional use in
the C-3 District, m~bjact'to the provisions of section 21.1-
9:
coo
(o) Computer Controlled variable Mesea~.Elestronic Signs.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon adoption.
Vote: Unanlmou~
TO CO.BIDeR AN ORDI~AH~ TO V~C~?~ BeThanY C~U~/~D~
SUBDIVISION
~r. Stith stated this date and ti~e has been aduertlsed to
Winterslow Drive within Eon Air Hills Subdivision.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Buard
adopted the followinq ordiaasee~
AN 0RDINA~CE whereby the COUNT~ oF
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, ("~PJ~NTOR") vesete~
to ARTMU~ T. HILL and LO~I~TA R, HILL,
(husband and wife), and WESTMORELAND
("GRANTEES"), Botany Court and a portion of
Wintersluw Driv~ (formerly Lunay Drive),
within Ben Air Hills SUbdivision, MIDLOTHIAN
~agis=eriel Dis=rict, chesterfield County,
Virginia, au sho~n on a plat thereof duly
recorded in the Clerk's Q£floe of %he Ciroui~
Court of Chesterfield County in Plat ~ook ~,
a~ ~ages 1~4-13~.
WHF2{EA~, ARTHUR To HILL and LORIETA R. HILL, (husband
and wife), and WESTmORELAnD PROPERTIES, A Virginia Central
Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate Botany Court and a
portion of Wint~rsle~ Drive within Bsa Air Hills Subdivision,
MIDSOT~IAN Magisterial District, Chesterfield County,
virginia mere particularly s~own on a plat of record in the
Clerk's Office sf th~ Circuit Court of ~aid County in Pla=
Bos~ 9, at Pa~es 134-136, by FOSTER & MILLER, dated ~LA¥ 14,
1956. The ~ights of way petitioned t~ b~ va~ak~d are mor~
fully described a~ fotlow~:
Botany Court and a portion of Wint~rslow
Drive, the locations of w~ich ara more fully
uhown on a plot made by B~5~R AND
ASSOCIATES, INS., dated JA~UAR~ 2~, 199q~ a
copy of which is attached hereto and m~de ~
~EREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Sectien 15.1-
431 of the Code of Virqlnia, 1~50~ a~ amend~, by
advertising; and
of the rights of way sought =o be vacated.
NOW THeReFORE, DE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF C~$TERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pur~ua~% to Get,ion 15.1-482(b) of the code of
Viroinis. 1950, as amended, the aforesaid rights of way be
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
aCCordance with Section 15.1-4~(b) of the Cods of Vir info,
1PS0, as amended, and a certified copy of ~his ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the clerk's office of
the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant
to ~action 15,1-4~ of the Co~e of Virginia, t950, as
The effect of this Ordinance pursuaDt to
483 is to destroy the force and effect ef the recording of
the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest
f~e simple title of the rights of way hereby vacated in the
property owners of the abutting 10ts within Son Air ~ills
Subdivision, free and clear of amy right~ of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the
name~ of th~ Counhy of Chesterfield as GRANTOR, and ARTHUR
HILL and LDRE/TA R. HILL, (husband and wife), and
WESTMORELAND ~ROD~TI~$, A VIRGINIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, or
their successors in titlerae GRANTEES~
vote: Unanimous
~r. Stith stated this date and tim~ ha~ be~n advertised for a
public hearing to consider a request to quitclaim a portion
of excess right-of-way adjacent to North Prsvidencs Road.
No one came forward to ~peak in favor of Or against this
On motion of Mr. Barber, s~conded by Dr. Nichol&s~ the Boa~d
authorized the Chairman of the Board and the County
Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed tu vacate a portion
of e~ces~ right-of-way adjacent to North Pre¥idmnce Road.
(It is noted a cody of the vicinity sketch is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
95SR022~
In Bermuda Magisterial District, JOHN T. ~ND C~LOTTE
BODE]~}Lm/4BR requests renewal of Mobile Home Permit 90SN0123 to
park a mobile home in a Residential (R-7} District. The
d~n~ity of this proposal i$ approximately 2,63 units
acre. Th~ Comprehensive Plan designates the property for
regional mixed use. This property i~ located approximately
160 feet off the west line of Seminole Avemue~ fro~ a Deist
approximately 830 feet southeast of ~iba street, and is
Bellmeade, Block 10~ Lots 17 - ~0 (Sheet
Ms. ~usselman pre~nted a summary of Case 95SR0223 and stated
staff recommends approval of the request for eov~n years,
subject to standard conditions, and that the u~e b~ viewed as
temporary given the land use recommendation s~ the Jefferson
Davis Plan.
~4r. John T. and Ms. Charlotte Bodenhamer stated th~
rscmmmenda~icn is acceptable. There was nc oppcsltlon
On motion of Mr. Mc~ale, seconded by Mr. Daniel, ~hs Board
approved Ca~e 955R0225 for s~gen (7) y~ar~ subject to the
following ~endition~:
The applicant shall ~e th~ ~wner an~ occupant of the
mobile home.
2. No lot or parcel may be rented or leased for u~e a~ a
mobile hume site, nor shall any mobil~ home be used for
rental property. Only one (1) mobile home shall be
pe~mit~e~ tu be pa~ked on an individual lot or parcel.
The minimum lot size~ yard setbacks, required front
yard, and other zoning requirements of the applicable
zoning distrio~ shall be complied with, except that no
mobile home shall be located closer than ~d f~et to any
existing residence.
4. No additional permanent-type living edeco ~ay be added
but shall not be placed on a permansnt foundation_
5. Where public (County) water and/er sewer a~e available,
Upon being granted a Mo~ile Home Permit, the applicant
~hall t~en obtain the necessary permits from the Office
of the Building Official. This shall be done prior to
the installation or relocation of the mobile home.
Any violation of the above condition~ ~hall be qroung$
Vote:
9~0239
In ~ermuda ~agisterial District~ ~C~ IRON ~D ~ET~
Z~. request~ Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a
5~0 foot communications tower in an Aqricultura%
District. The density of such a~endment will be controlled
by ~oning eondition~ o~ ordinance ~tandards. The
industrial use. This request lies on S.~ acres leea~ed off
the eastern terminu~ of station Road. Tax MaD 53-i2 (1)
~s. Musselman stated the applicant is requesting a tws week
defsrral to allow furthar discussion with adjacent prop~rty'
Mr. John Cogbill~ representing the applicant, stated
recomm=ndation for a two w~ek deferral is acceptable.
No one cam~ forward to ~p~ak in favor of or against the
deferral.
95 247 4/12/9~
on motio~ of Mr. McHale, seconded by Dr. NichoLas, the Board
deferred Ca~ 9~SN0~ un~il April 26, 1995.
Vote: Unanimous
95SNO~3e (Amended}
In Matoaca Magisterial District, ~1~4 CABLE
conditional Use Planned Development to permit a 1,02S foot
communications tower in an Agriou&tural (A) District~ The
density of such amendment will be controlled by zoning
Conditions or Ordinance ~tandar~$. Thc Comprehensive Plan
~asiqnates the property for regional mixed use. This request
lie~ on 9~5 corms fronting approximately 25 fs~t cn thc mast
linc cf Dry Brld~e Road, approximately 1,500 feet ~outh of
Midlothian Turnpike. Tax Map 14 (1) Part of Parcel 10o
(sheet
M~. Musmalman presented a sumn~ary of Case 955N0236 and stated
thc Plcnning Conumis$ion and staff recommends approval subject
to conditions. She noted the request conforms to thm
~wi~t Cr~k
Mr. $ohn Cogbill, representing ~hc applicant, mtat~d the
recommendation is acceptable. There was no opposition
On motion of Dr. Nisho!a~, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
approved Case 9~SN0236 subject to the following condition~:
I. There shall b~ nQ signs permitted t~ i~cntify this use.
The bass Of the tower shall be enclosed by a minimum
(6) foot high f~nc~, dosignmd to preclude trespassing.
A detailed plan depicting thi~ r~quir~nt ~all be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval in
conjunction with final ~ite plan review.
3. Prior to release of a buildin~ permit for the tower,
copy of FA~ approval shall ~e submitted to the Planning
D~partmen~, (P)
4. The tower and equipment shall be designed and installed
~o as not to interfere with t~m Chesterfield County
Public Safety Trunked System. The developer shall
p~rfor~ an cnginscrin~ ztudy to dmtermin~ the
possibility of radio frequency interference with the
County syste~_ ~riQr ~o rsleasc Q£ a building permit,
the ~tudy shell be sub. it%ed to, and approved by, the
Chesterfield County Communications an~
mtaff.
5. The developer ~hall be re~ponsibl~ fo~ correcting any
frequency prQblems wkick affect ~he Chesterfield County
Public Safety Trucked System caum~d by %his use. Such
corrac%ion~ shall be made immediately upon notification
~y ~he C~esterfield County Communications and
El~ctronic~ staff~
Th~ color and liqhting ~ymtem fox the ~OW~r shall be a~
follows:
a. Th~ tower shall be q~y or another n~utral color,
acceptable to the Planning Department.
b_ Medium intensity strobe lights %with upward
reflection ~ay be use~ du~ing daylight' hours.
c. If the tower is liqhted at ni~ht~ lighting ~hall be
limited to soft blinking lights.
7. All driveways and parking areas shall be graveled Or
paved and maintained to minimize dust problems and'
provide ease of ingress and egress. (P)
Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
~ection 21~1-~4g of the Zoning Ordinance relative to
architectural treatment of building exteriore and
screening of mechanical equipment. (~)
INOTE: This condition would require the screening of
mechanical equipment legated on t~e building or ground
from adjacent properties and public rights of way.
$creenin~ would not be required for t~e tower or tower-
mounted equipment.)
9. At such time that the tower ceases to be used for
~e~munication~ purposes for a period exeeedin~ twetv~
{12) ~onsecutlve months, th~ owner/developer shall
diemantle and remove the tower and all
equipment from th~ property,
· O- In ~onjun~tion wl~h ~he approval of this r~ques~, an
foot eRception to the 150 foot height limitation shall
be granted.
Vote: Unanlmou~
16. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Daniel, eeconded by ~r. Barber, the Board
adjourned a~ ~:0~ p.m. until A~ril 24, i~D at 4:QQ p,m., in
ROO~ 502 of th~ Administration Building, for a meeting with
members cf the Committee on the Future regarding a report on
th~ decline of urban suburbs in Virginia by Dr. William Lucy.
Vote: Unanimous
Lafe B. Ramssy~ ~
County Administratd~