05-10-1995 MinutesDr. Freddie W. Nicholas,
Kr. Lane B, Ran~ey
County Administrator
Staff ~n At=en~anae:
Offic~ on Youth
Mr. craig Bryant, Dir.,
Utilities
~a. Marilyn cola, Exac.
Asst. to County Admin.
M_r. william D. Du9lar,
Building official
Chief Rober~ L. Eanos, Jr.,
Fire Department
Ms. Suzanna Flaming,
Chief of Social Work,
Fir. Lawrence C.
III, Registrar
Far. Bradford ~. Mammer,
D~Du~y CO. Admin.,
Management ~ervicas
Mr. Ruusell Harris,
County Ombudsman
Dir., Planning
~Lr. H. Edward
Dir., Purchasing
.14:r, Robert L. Maa~an,
Deputy CO. Admfn.,
M~. R. John MeC~ackan,
Dir., Transportation
Mr. Richard M. MeElfish,
Dir., ~nv. Enginsering
Mr, Steven L. Micas,
County Attorney
M~- Kenneth Perrott=,
Dir., Public ASSairs
~r. Franci~ M. Pitaro,
Dir., General
Col. J. E. Pittman, Jr.,
Ms. Theresa M. Pitts,
Clark ~o the Baar~
Mr. James U. L. Stegmaier,
Dir., Budget & Management
Mr. M. D. stith,
Community Development
Mr. Frederick Willis, Jr.,
Dir., ~uman Resource ~g~.
Mr. McMal~ called the regularly achedulsd meeting to order at
3:05 p.m.
! i
1. ~PPROV~L OP MINUTES
On mo%ion of Dr. Nicholas, seconded by M~. Barter, the Bourd
approved the minutes oS A~rll 24, 1995, as SUbMitted.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of MT. War~en, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
approved th~ minu~es of April 25e 1995~ as amended.
Sots: unanimsus
~, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'8 COMME/~TS
Mr. Ramsay introduced ~s. Bennett who state~ the ~o~el County
Government Program ia an annual event ~pon~o~ed by th~ office
on Youth, the ~oc~al ~tudi~s DepartMent for ~he School SysteM,
and the Chester and Manshe~ter Family YMCAs~ She further
stated students will held a mock ~eard of Supervisors meeting
on May ll and expressed appreciation to those involved in
working with and preparing ~he s~u~ents ~o~ ~he Mock Uoar~
were participating in the PrograM.
Mr. RaMsay then introduced ~r. Bryant who stated the swift
Dam" in ~he State a% the 1995 Virginia Water Resources
Conference. He further stated the Award wa~ pr~entsd joln~ly
operation and malntnnanoe cf municipal earthen dam~. He
to excellence.
Mr, Ramsay th~n introduoe~ Mr, Hammer who introduced ~s. sue
Director of Purchasing. He stated Hs. banielson has recently
stated Ms. Danielson has been active in Total Quality
Improvement efforts, in County employee involvement g~0~p~, and
is also an active volunteer fur sheltering Arms Hospital. He
expressed appreciation to Ms. Danialson for her commitment to
excellence and sta~ed he ~ecls shs is an asset to ~c County.
Each Board Member congratulated Ms. Danielsen on reseiwing ~his
recognition.
~s.. Danielscn expressed appreciation for the recognition and
Chesterfield County.
95-289 5/10/95
BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mr. Daniel etated he recently became the q~andfather of a Dine
pound, ten eunce bmby boy, Nathan Daniel Boohholz, who was born
on May 5. He thanRed everyone for their exprausicns uf concern
REOURST8 TO POSTPONE ACTION~ EMEMSENCY ADDITIONS. OR
c~E~ IN THE ORDER OF ~RE~ENTATiO~
On motion of Dr. Nicholas, seconded by Mr. barber, the Buard
added Item $.B.l.c., Adoption of Re~clutian Supporting the
Richmond Downtown Multlmedal Tranepsrtat~on Center to follow
Ite~ 8.B,l.b., Adoption of Resolution Recognizing May ~4-10,
1995 as "National Law Enforcemant W~ek" an~ deferred Item
14.A.1., Resolution Recognin~ng Mr. David L. French, Troop 894,
Upon Attaining RaD~ o~ Eagle Scout un~it Jun= 14, 199~ and,
ado~ted the agenda, a~ amended.
Vote: Unanimous
5. RESOLUTIONS ~ SPECIAL RECOGNItiONS
~.A. RECOSNIZIN~ VIRGINIA TEOH AS W~FNERS OF THE NATIONAL
I~VITATEONAL TOURNAKENT CHAMPIONSHIP
~r. Stith introduced Mr. R. John McCracken, Director of the
County's Transportation Dep~rtment, and Mr. Craig S. Bryant,
Director of the County's Utilities Department, who w~re
to receive the resolution.
faced tremendous odds~ wi~ key injuries forcing the squad to
play wi~h littl~ depth; and
~EREAS, Mr. ~ill ~o~ter, ~n hi~ 2~th year
Coach, masterfully juggled the talent to g~t th~ very b$~t 0~t
of each availabl~ player; and
~ER~S, ~ te~ ~howed ~eart fro~ start to finish to
the sport at ~m University; and
~ER~S, the Hoklem mwept the School's second National
Invitational Tournanent cha~pion~hip, pru~u~ing a new
~lmost every game -- Mr. Ace Cust~s~ ~. Shawn Good~ ~r. Damon
WH~R~9, Virginia Tach becam~ one of th~ mo~t a4mire4
team~ in the University's sp~rts history.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RE9OLVED~ that ~e Chemte~field
County Board of Sup~rvi~or~ co,eBbs the aokie players an~
the County's Director of Tran~portatlon, Director of utilities,
Director of Extension Servlce~ and over 3~000 virqinia
~lumni living in Chesterfield County.
95-290 5/10/95
I i
~2~D, E~ IT F~RT~ER RESOLVED, that copie~ of this
raooluticn be merit to Mr. Paul Torgermen, ~r~sident; Mr. David
Bralne, Athletic Director; and Hr. Bill Po~tar, M~ad Coach.
Vote: Unanimous
Dr. Niehola~ preeentedthm executed re~cl~tion to Mr. Mocraoken
and F~. Bryant and Congratulated Virginia Tach on their
outstanding accomplishment.
Mr. MoCrao~en ~xpr~ssed appreclat~on for the recognition and
presented Dr. Nicholas with a Virginia Tach hat.
Mr. Bryant introduced Mr. Merbert Evans, Plan= Manager of the
the resolution.
o~ me,ion of the ~oard, ~e following resolution was adopted:
depen~ on an abundant supply of ~afe, high quality water; and
WHEREAS, the future growth of chesterfield County d~pands
a q~eat deal on the Ccunty'~ ability to provide drir~king water~
WHZR~AS, Chesterfield County has sponsored a variety of
effectively; and
WHEREAS, chesterfield County will continue to educate the
W~R~AS, the public drinking water in Chesterfield county
is treated to the highest $~andards and delivered to each
"Chesterfield County Public Drinking Wa~er Week" in honor and
appreciation of the excellent Water provided to the citizens of
Chester£i~ld County.
expressed appreciation to ~taff fo~ their efforts in providing
high quality water to County citizens, and stated the County i~
staff at =he Plant for their efforts in providing ~afet quality
drinking water to the public.
Ms. Fleming introd~oed Mr. Ron Gouldt representi~ th= Foster
Parent A~soclat~on, and N~. Carole Andrews, senior social
Wor~er for the Department of Social Services, who were present
9~-291 5/i~195
............ r .... r': I i ' I~ lr
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WB~qF=A~, cur ~oci~ty depend~ upon family life to prepare
each new generation of children to be responsible citizens; end
WHEREAS, soma troubled families in our community are net
able to safely care for their children while resolving problems
at home~ and
refuge for children who are at risk to be abused or neglected;
and
WHEREAS, many families in Chesterfield County have opened
their ho~ to th~s~ children by becoming fo~ter famili~ who
work with the public and private agencies which serve troublad
families in out community; end
WHEREAS, foster families improve the quality of llfe for
their foster ehildren~ our ccmmunity~ and future generations by
pruviding love, guidance, and positive life experiences to the
children placed temporarily in their care; and
acknowledge end euppor~ the compassionate work of foster
families to children in our cummunity.
~OW~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED~ that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervlsura hereby proclaims the month of ~ay,
199S as "Foster Parent Recognition Month" in Chesterfield
county an~ calls th~s recognition to ~c attention cf all itc
Vote: Unanimou~
~s. Andrews and expressed appreciation for the important work
done by fo~ter parents end Social Services staff in giving
generously of their time and energy to provide care for foster
~hil~ren,
Mr. Gould ~tAtcd he has been a foster parent for approximately
in need.
~.D. RECOGN~I~ F~Y A~ "ADULT ABUSE PREVENTION ~ONTH"
WHEREAS,
huz~med by the
an~
Me. Fle~ing intrcducad Ms. Carol Clay, Service Supervisor, Mr.
James McDonald, Service Worker, ~s. Ann Owenm-Strick~er~ Senior
social Worksr, and M~. Betty ~otland, social Worker, all of the
Departmant of Social Services, who were present to receive the
resuluBion.
On motion of the Soard, the ~ellcwing resolution wes adopted:
W~ER~A$, during "Adult Abuse Prevention Month" we
recognize end hono~ the ~ny COntributions older adults and
incapacitated younger a~ults make to our society; and
u~Surtun=tely, v~lnerable adults are sometimes
v~ry people who are entrusted with their care;
W~EREAS, there er= numerous dedicated indivlduels and
o~ganizations in Chesterfield County who work daily to break
the cycle of adult a~use and neglect en~ to develop reeeurcee
for both older adults and incapacitated young adult~ and their
families; and
5/10/95
W~EREAS, the chesterfield County Board cf Supervisors
continues to support innovative proqram~ to prevent abuse,
neglect, and exp!oitagicn of i~s most vulnerable adult mit±zen~
and to allevlat~ suffering of those who are victimized.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes the month of MayI
1995 as "Adult Abuse Prevsntie~ ~ontdh".
A~D, BE IT FURT~ZR RESOLVED, that appreciation is hereby
extended to adult p~otective services workers and other
professionals for their dedication in working with our ~enior
and incapacitated citizens and that thi~ resolution be called
to the attention u£ all County citizens.
Vote: Unanimou~
accompanied by Mr. McDonald, Ms. Owens-~tickler, ~n~ Ms.
Holland, a~ expressed ap~rsciatlon ~or their efforts in the
area of adult abuse and for promotinq programs which serve the
community.
~e. Clay expressed upprmciation for the recognition end for the
~. WORK SESSIONS
There were no work sessions scheduled.
RESTRICTIONS
~. Mica~ stated consideration of a request of kdvance
Sy~tam~, Incorporated for modification of Air~ort Industrial
Park side yard restrictions has been deferred at several
previous Board meetings. He f~rther stated Advance Energy
Systems ha~ been in violation of the county's
covenants at the Airport Industrial Park; that the site plans
for Advance Energy systems was mistakenly approved in
that Advance ~n~rgy Systems is the lessee not the owner; and
the ewne~ has indicated a willingness to purchase the necessary
property and construct the parking if A~vance Energy would
agree to extend its lease, however, Advance Energy has not
agreed to do so. ~e ~ated staff recmmmsndz ~enial of the
exemption to th~ r~t~ictive covenants in allowing a
modification or exemption frs~ the existing covenants.
Mr. Dunlml stated he was unaware that Advance Energy Systems is
not thm owner of the property an~ inquired as to why they have
not agreed to extend their lease.
Mr. Ramsay =tared the issue of signing ~ha ieaee is a private
exemption to the restrictive covenantm, hsw~ver, County staff
thim
Mr. Daniel inqRired as to whether A~vance Energy systems is
willing to eMtend their l~ase with the owner.
Glenn Moore, Esquire, representing Advance Energy Systems,
would make the improvements if they extend the lease.
Afte~ brief discussion, ~ir. Daniel made a motion, seconded ~y
Mr. Barbar~ for the Board to defer consideration of a request
of Advance Energy Systems, Incorporated for modification of
Airport Industrial Park side yard restrictions until May 24,
lggM to provide an opportunity for staff, the property owner,
and the attorney representing Advance ~nergy Systems to attempt
to resolve this issue.
ar. Barber olarified =he item before the Board impo~es limits
as to what the Board can address and whether or not the
property owner and A~vance Energy Systems agrees on extension
of the l~ase ia an issue beyond purview of the Board.
~. Ramsay stated the County do~s not have the authority
impose am agreement between the property owner and the lessee,
however, staff will continue to meet with =he two parties in an
effort to resolve this issue.
the request ~o the Board rather than Advanoe Energy Systems and
he wa~ unaware that Advance Energy Systems was the lessee and
not the property owner.
F~c. Warren stated based on the recu~nda~iun of staff,
prepared to race--end denial of the reque~t~ however, at thi~
time he will support the r~qua~t fur a two week deferral.
~. ~Male salted for the vote on the motion ~ade
Daniel, ~econd=d by ~. Barber, for the Board to defer
consideration of a request of Advanoe Mnergy systems,
InCOrporated for modification of Airport Industrial Park side
yard ~est~iotion~ un~il ~ay 24, 199~ to provide an opportunity
for mtaff, the property o~er, and the attorney representing
Advanc~ =nervy Systems to attempt to resolve this issue.
Vote:
~. N~W BUSINE~
On motion of Mr. W~rr~m, seoended by Dr. ~ichelas, the Board
approved th~ following streetlight installation cost approvals
with said funds being expended from the designated streetlight
fund:
Bermuda District
* Fox Knoll Drive, end of cul-de-sac
Nc cost to install llght
* Clear Spring~ Court, end of c~l-da-sac
~o coat to install llght
(DUe to safety concerns)
Matoaca Distriot
* Aldridge Avenue~ on existing pole, at dead end near railroad
track~
~ cost to install light
And, further, the Board deferred a strea%!ight installation
co~t approval for Ransom Hills Court, ~nd Of cul-de-sac,
located in Bermuda Magisterial District, until no later than
August 23, 1995t to allow ~taff an opportunity to contact the
aRpllcant an~ ~etermlne whathar cafety ~oncerns are an issue
for this streetlight.
Vote: Unanimous
TPJ~N~PORT&TION
On motion of l~ir, Barber, se=onded by Dr. ~icholas, the ~oard
adopted the following ~esolution:
I-9~/Woo~s ~dge Road Interchange, which ~ust be addressed; and
WHeReAS, Nr. John Cnqbill is intimately familiar wit~ the
tra~spo~tatiun need~ of Chenterfi~ld County and the entire
Governor appoint M~. John coqbill to fill the upcoming
Commonwealth Transportation Bo~rd seat representing the
for their support for Mr. cogbill'~ appointment.
Vote: Unan~mou~
O~ ~otion of Mr. Barber, ~ec:nded by Dr. ~icholac, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
enforcement ~genci¢~ throughout the County p~ovide ~n
invaluable eervi~ tu all citizens~ and
WHEREA$~ =ha we~k of ~ay 14-20, 1995, is recognized as
outstanding and professional individuals as law enforcement
officers in Th~s%er~iold county who serve to protect t~e
health, safety, and welfare of its citlsenry.
NOW, T~ER~FOR~ B~ IT RESOLVED, that ths Chesterfisld
County Board cf Supervisors declares the week of ~uy 14-20,
1~9~, as "~atienal Law ~nfercement week~' in chesterfield county
and calls this recognition to the attention of all its
citizens.
on motion of Mr. Barber~ seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Beard
adopted the following resolution:
~EREAH, a feasibility study ha~ been conducted for the
construction of a multi~sdel transportation oenter at the Main
Street Station site in the City of Richmond~ and
WHEREA~, a Main Street Station ~ul~imodal Center will
pr~vlde beneflts to the reqion; and
WHEREAS, these ben,fits include, among others, expanded
rail service for the region, restoration of th~ historic Hain
Street Station, an economic stimulus tc Richmond's convention
business, and an aid to r~develupm~nt of shu~koe Bottom.
Tobacco Row, and th~ river front area; and
WHEREAS, a strong, vibrant central city ben.fits the
~OW~ THEREFOR~ BE IT RESOLVED, t~at the CheDte~£ield
COUnty Board of Supervisors supports the implenentation of the
multimodal oonter projec= a~ provided through ~s Metropolitan
Planning Organization (~4~0) Transportation Improvement Plan
~OENTY ADMINISTRATOR
On notion of Mr. Berber~ seconded by Dr. Nioholas, the Board,
according to the virginia Code, Section 15.1-54~, approved a
request to establish an additional Petty Cash Fund, in the
amount of $~,000, in the name of the "County Administrator".
On motion of ~r. Barber, ascended hy Or- Nioh01~, the $oar~
transferred $I,6~0 from the Dale Distriot Three Cent Road to
the School Board for designation to the ~eadowbrosk High School
Act~v~t~e~ Fund. (It is noted Mr. Ban~el expressed his
iatention that these funds be used by th~ M~adowbrook ~T~A to
assis~ wi~ ~o pre-~raduation party for the Class of 1995.
Note: State Law requires the appropriat~oB be ~ad~ to th9
school Board.)
OF APFROFRIATIONS
DISTRICT THREE CENT ROAD FUND
IHPRO~rF24ENTE TO ROYAL BIRKD~LE DRIVE
On no,ion of r~r. Berber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
appropriated $3,000 from the Natoaca Dimtrlot Three Cent Road
Fund ts be used to purchase pipe to be in,tailed on Royal
Birkdale Drive.
Vote: Unanimous
STATE LIBRARY BRANT FUNDS FOR RECORDS PRESERVATION
On ~otion o~ ~r. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
appropriated $S5,000 of State Library ~rant fundm to th~
Circuit Cour~ Clerk for the optical Scannin~ and Microfilm
Conversion (records preservation) Froject. (It i~ noted this
Grant does ne~ require local funds and th~ Clerk's office will
absorb the increase in workload to fulfill the purposes e£ ~his
Grant.)
~.,B,.,S.,, AUTHORIZATION FOR tOUNTY ~D~N~ST~TOe rS E~EC~T~
AN A~RE~MENT WITH VIRGINIA POWER
On motion of ~r. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, th= Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute an agreement
with Virginia Power for electrio ~e~vice.
S.B.~. AUTHORI~ATIO~ FOR SOLIDS DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR
s.R.6.a. DR~G ENFORCF~4ENT POSITION
On notiom of ~. Ba~be~, ~econded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
authorized the Police Department ts ap~ly ~cr a Departmen= of
Criminal J~stice Services Intensified Drug Enforcement
Assistance Fund Grant whic~ woul~ pruvid= centlnued funding for
the Intelligence Analyst p~sition for a period of one year.
Vote: Unanimous
9~.B..6..b,....~I~IIWAY SAFETY ISSUES
On not,on of Kr. Barber~ ~eccnded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
authorized the Police Department to apply for a Highway Safety
Grant which would provide funding for overtime of existing
personnel and equipment for highway safety issues.
SBT DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONGIDER APPROPRIATIGE
DESIGN OF INTERSTATE 95/WGODS EDGE ROAD INTEECHANOE
On motion of Mr. Barber~ seconded by Dr. Niohclas~ the Board
set the date of Kay 24, 199§ at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing
to censidsr appropriation of Virginia Department of
Vote: Unanimous
TEE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF ~HESTERFIELD. 1978.
R~L~TIN8 TO KEIOHT LIMITATION O~ N~TBR~L ~BOW~
O~ motio~ of ~r. Barber, seconded by Dr. Bicholas, the Board
referred to the Planning Commission, for =hair review and
recommendation, an ordinance to ¢on~ider ~_m~ndinq the Cod~ of
the County o~ Chesterfield. 1972, as amendsd, by amending and
reenacting Section 11.1-~1~ r~lating to h~ight limitation of
natural growth.
Vote: Unanimous
REOUESTIE~ ~ARIANGES
5106 HARTSDALE ROAD
on motion of ~r. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nio~01as, t~e Board
initiated an application to th~ Board of Zoning Appeal~
requesting a variance to the four (4) foot height restriction
Road.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
initiated an application to t~e Board of Zoning Appeals
requesting ~ variance to the eight (~) foot front yard setback
rem=rio=ion for a detached garage for property at 16109 Lucia
Drive.
Vote; Unanimous
8.E.~. EEOUE~T FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY
On motion of Mr. Barber, sooonded by Dr. Nichola~ th~ Board
approved a request for a permit by Mr. Roqer Bottorff,
Promotion Coordinator of southside speedway, to stage a
firework= display at ~outh~id~ Speedway on May l~, 199~, which
request is ~abject to approval by tke Fire Department and the
County Attorn~y?s Office.
Vote:
8.~.11. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer~ in accordance with
directions from thls Board, made report in writing uDon his
examination of ~he reade in HicKory Grove, ~atouca District,
and
Wherea~, the Re~i~ent Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the Director of ~nvironmental
Engineering, the ~treets in Hiokory $roYu, Ratoa=a D~strict,
Rec~irements of the Virginia D=~ur%ment of TransDortation, and
Whereas, the County and the virginia Department of
Tran~peFtaticn have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Book 2453, Pa~ 405, January 21, 1994, for all
dat=ntion/retuntion facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon Qon~idera~ion whereof, and on motion of
Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, it is resolved that the roads
in Hickory Grove, Matoaca District, b~ and tbsy hereby are
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Depa~tm=nt of
V~n~a, and the D~partnent'e subdivision Street Requirements,
the following:
Nane of Street: Eickez~; Grove Drive ~n~h: 0.07 mile
Vil!age ~arkway north from the
intersection with Villaq~ S~a~e
Parkway
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 5Q' feet.
With HiCkory Grove Drive
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slop~, $ight
91at.
8.B.12. APPROI~A~ O~ W~TEH CO~ECTION AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE
WATER BERVIOE TO 13431 LOP~ LY/~N ROAD
On ~otion of M~. Ba~bur, s~cond=d by Dr. Nicholas, th~ Board
approved a water connection agreement to provide water service
to 13431 Lo~a LyDn Road. (It is noted a copy of the vicinity
sketch is filed wit~ =he ~a~ars os this ~oard.)
Vote: Unanimous
95-299 5/10/95
8.B.13. ~PPROV~L O~%~%TER CONP~CT FOR RIVER BIDGBo SECTION E
On motion of 55r. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
approved the following water con=tact far River Ridge, Soo=ion
E, Project Number 94~00S8, which project includes extension of
1,220 LF ~ of sight inch and 32 LF of six inch off-site water
line~ and authurized th~ County Administrator tc eXeCUte any
Developer: Jamia Chafin
Contractor: Coastline Contractors, Incorporated
Contrao~ Amount: ~stimeted Total -
Total ~st~nstsd County Cost;
(Qff-si=e~
Estimated Developer Cost: $49,389.8~
Coda: (5B-5?2VO-E4D)
District: Natoaca
Vote: Unanimous
8.B.14. ACCEPTANCES OF PARCELS OF LAND ALONG IRON BRIDGE ROAD
8.B.14,a, SBRT ASSOCIATES
0~ ~cti0n cf Mr. ~arber, seconded by Dr. ~icholas, the ~oard
acce~te~, on behalf of the County, th~ conv~yinc~ u~ a parcel
of land containing 0.229 acres alonq Iron Bridge Road (Stats
Route 10) £rum Sort As~uciata~ and authorized the County
Administrator to execute the ~eeessary deed. (It is ~oted a
copy of the plat is filed with the DeBars o~ this Board.)
vote: Unanimous
On motion of }~r. Barber, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
accepted, on behulf of the County, the conveyance cf a parcel
of land contsinin~ 0.~0 acres &long Iron Bridge Road (State
Route 10) from Tho Lifo Insurance Company sf virginia and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary
of this Board.)
~r. ~ioas stated WrighE Associates, Incorporated, a Newport
News contractor, was hired by the County to perform telephone
and data cable wiring a~ Jam~s Rive~ wig~ amd Battle Weaver
Elementary Schools. He further stat¢~ Wright A~ociat¢~
subcontracted the work to R&R Coi~unications, Incorporated of
work began and work quickly fell behind schedule because
~ndermtaff~d %he project; and in early May, an inspection of
the work established that R&R had installed the cable
incorrectly, thereby preventing the cable from being used for
telephones and computers as intended, aa stated in early June,
1994, Wright Associates recognized incorrect wiring had been
in,tailed and agreed t~ =orreot the problem, h~wsver, by
ARgUer, 1994, the incorrect wiring had nat bssn completely
removed and staff became concerned that thc wiring would not be
completed by the start of the school year. Hs further stated
because of th~ failBr~ to somp!~ ~h~ work properly, Wright
Associates was terminated from the job and Carlton Gray
retained and completed 80 percent of the work for the entire
project within two weeks time. Be stated Wright Aseo~iatee has
new filed a claim, in the amount of $97,788.25~ for damage~
arising out of their ten~ination from the job. Ke further
denial of the claim and that N. Leslie Saunders,
represent±nS the general contraCtOr, indicated he would not be
present at the meeting today.
Mr. Warren made a motion, eeconde~ ~y Mr. Barber, for thc Beard
to deny the claim of Wright A~ociate$~ Incorporated, in the
amount of
It ~s noted Mr. Marlin Scott, syEtems Management Coordinator
for the County School Sy~tem*s Instructional T~ohnology and
Information Management Department, was pre&ent at the meeting.
Warran~ s,cond~d by~4~. Barber, fez the Board to deny the claim
of Wright Associates, Incorporated, in the amount of
On ~otion of Dr. Nicholas, eeeonded by ~r. McHale~ the Board
accepted the following reports:
repsrt on the General Fund Balance; ReseDve for Futurm Capital
Projects; Districk Road and Strea~ Light Fundm; Lease
Purchases; and School Board Agenda.
And, further, the Board accepted the following roads into the
Sta~e Secondary System:
CEEE~UJOOD, $~CTION L - (Effective 4-9~
Route 45~ {Ashby Lane) - From Route 3170 to
0.07 mile ~ast Route 3170 0.07 Mi
Vote: Unanimous
11, ~ODEL ~OUBTY GOVEENI(ENT DAY ~TUDE~T RECEPTION
recessed to the Executive Session Room for a reception with
1~. INVOCATION
Reverend Michael Irvin, Pas~or cf Robicus Baptist Churcd%, gave
the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALL~GIARCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF
Michael Anthony Redd, Troop $00, led the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag of the United State~ of America.
95-30l 5/Z0/95
14.A. RECOG~I~I~ ~O¥ ~CUTS UPO~ ATTAINING ~ OF
SCOUT
14.A.2. ~. MICHEL ~THO~ REDD, TR~D~ aDD
On motion of ~e Board, the fcllo~ing re~olutiun was
WHEREAS, the Boy Scout~ cf America w~u incorpOrated by~r.
William D. Boyc~ on F~bruary 8, 1910; and
~EREA$~ the ~oy Scouts of ~erica wa~ fo~ded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
~EREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit bad,es
a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position
a troop~ carrying out a service project beneficial to his
co,unity, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout
~plrlt, and llvlnq up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
~EREAS, ~. Michael Anthony Redd, Troop SOO, sponsored by
R~i Baptist Church, has accomplinhed~os~ hiqh~tandardm of
co~itment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagt~ Scout
which is received by le~s than two percent of those individual~
e~tering t~e Scouting ~0ve~e~t~
learning the l~ssons of responsible citizenship, and ~riding
himself ~n the great accomplishments of his County, Michael
indeed a membe~ of a ne~ ~ene~ation of D~eDared youn~ citizens
of whom we can all be vary proud.
NOW, THER~FOR~ B~ IT ~SOLV~D, that ~e Chesterfield
to ~r. Nichael Anthony Redd and acknowledges the good fortune
its
Vote: Unanimous
~- Barber pr~nte4 %h~ ~xeouted re~ol~iun to Mr.
aooompanied by members of his family, and congratulated him on
hi~ outstanding achievement.
"A ~IR~INIA NONOR ~A~D"
Mr. $tith introduce4 Me. Patti ~ewmmn, Band Director of James
On motion of the Board, the following resolutfon wes adopted:
the title of "Virginia Boner Band";
W~EFcEAS, thi~ Award recognizes the accomplishments of
levels of achievement in both marching and concert
it has never been given to a new ~chool that did not have
senior band members; and
WMEREAS, to achieve this honor a band must earn the
superior rating at both marching and coscert festivals; and
WHEREAS, the J~mes River Nigh School Band completed half
of this ra~nir~mant in the Fall of 1994 when they ~eoeived
superior ratings at the State Nar~hing Festival and in March,
199§ when the Symphonic and Concert Band received supe~io~
rating~ at the DiEtrict TTI Band Festival.
NOW, T~EREFORE BE IT RES0LVE0, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby congratulates the James
River High School Band and acknowledges the contributions of
the students participating in the Band and for their
outstanding representation of Chesterfield County in being
named a "Virginia Honor Band".
Vote: Unanimous
~r. Barber presented the e~e~uted resolution to Ms. Newman,
aouom~snied by Kiss Allison Embry, Band Drum Major, and Miss
~eraldin~ Baine, 5and President, and congratulated them on
~hsir uutstanding accun~lishmen:s.
~s. Newman outlined the aetivlties the Band has undertaken and
expressed appreciation for the recognition.
~4,C. RECO~_~I3ING ~Y ~1-27. 1995 ~B "VOLUNTEER REBCUB BOU~D
Chief Manes introduee~ re~resentaSive~ of the Bsnelsy-Bsrmuda,
Ettrick-Matoaca, Forest View, and Me.chester Volunteer Rescue
On notion of the Board, the following re~olu~ien was ad~p~ed:
WH~EA$, B~n$1ey-~ermuda, Ettrlok-Ma~oaoa, Forest view,
and Manchester Voluntee~ Rescue Squads provide pre-hompital
patient care to the citizens of C~ssterfiel~ Gounty~ and
W~R~A$, la$~ year~ over 400 volunteer rescue squad
members in Chaste.field County answered over 9,000
medical calla; and
WHEREAS, volunteers give of their time to participate in
training and continuing education ~o that they may provide the
~s, ~heme ~rv~e~ ar~ provided wi~o~t monetary
co~pensatiun, representing a considerable ~aviDg~ ~O
~S~ Chesterfield County is oo~itted ~o assisting
Squads and making them an integral part of the County's
~ergency Medical Services and re~ests each citizen
recognize the contributions made b~ the volunteers.
county Board of Supervisors hereby p~oclaims the week of May
21-27, 199B as ~'Volunt~er Rescue Squ~d Week" and re~e~t~ =he
citizens of Chesterfield County to pa~ticipatz in activities
~Donsored by their 1Qcal Squa~s ~o promo=e safe~y a= ~ome,
Vote: Unanimuus
Bartin~ka~, President of Bentley-Bermuda Velunteer Rescue
~quad; Mr. Jesse Croo~, Vice President of Ettrick-~atoaca
Volunteer Rescue squad; Mr. Pete cogoeshall~ comptroller for
Forest View Voluntmer Rescue Squad; and ~r. ~elson Negaard,
President of Manchester Volunteer Rescue S~ued; s=com~aniedby
service the $~uade previde.
Mr. Negaard e~press~d appreciation for the recognition and fer
the support of the County.
Z~. P~LI~ HF~A~ING~
iS.A, TO OONSIDER AH AHENDKENT TO THE F¥94-95 BUDGET TO
~ENTER O0~MISSION FOR 00~TRUOTION OF ~ ~EWN0~SIE~ HOHE
Mr. Masden stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing to consider appropriating and transferring
$1,500,~00 from the county's Reserve far Capital Projects to
nursing home facility.
Ms. Pattie Winship stated ~e~ fat~er is a resident of
~ursing Home and receives excellent care. s~e requested the
Home; that she also works a~ the Nursing Ho~e; and that her
receive~ e~cellent oars. She requested the Board to give
Severable oonelderatlen to the request.
Nursing Home; that the daycare facilitles at the Nursing
approximately thirty-three years; that his mother ia a resident
care from the Nursing Kome staff and adminle~ratlon. He
requested %he Board to qive favorable consideration to the
request.
and she participated in the daycare facilities at t~e Nursing
~ome; that he is a volunteer at the Nursing aom~ and %hat th~
Chesterfield County; that the Subcommittee endorses the
worker, She f~rther stated the ~urslng Home is the only entity
in the County providing day care services, but is in need of
expansion and the services provided by the ~ursing Home are
e~cellent, she requested the Board to give favorable
F~r. Joe Gill stated his mother is a resident of the N~r~ing
Home; that the Nursing ~ome provides excellent care; that the
Nursing Home is needed as well other additional facilities; and
that at some timal everyone is confronted with addressing the
needs of family members. He requested the Hoard to give
favorable consideration to the request.
Ms. S=ndra Woodfin Dunnavant stated her mother is a resident at
the ~oard to give favorable consideration to the regnsst.
M~. McHale recognized ~4~. J. Ruffin Appersen, a past ne~ber of
the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Apper~on ~tat~d him father-in-law is a resident of the
Nursing Home and receives excellent care. He further stated he
feels the support of County government makes the Nursing Home
one of the best facilities in the country and requested the
Doard to give favorable consideration to the request.
There being no one else to address this issue, the public
Mr. MmHale stated he is very supportive of the Nursing Home and
recognized thos~ present in support of the Nursing Home. He
further stated there are still staff issues that need to be
addressed.
Mr. McHale then made a mo~icn for the Hoard to de,er
consideration of an amendment to the FY94-95 Budget to
far Capital Projects to give to the Health Center Commission
for oonst~uotien of a new nursing hcmm facility until June 14,
1995.
Mr. Warren seconded the ~etion. He ~teted the Board ~upports
the Lucy Ccrr ~ursing Home and that the issue needing to be
addressed is ho~ the Nursing Home will continue to be expanded
and improved in t~e future. ~e furSher stated the request is
for a larg~ amount of money and he f~els the Doard needs to
proceed with caution to maintain the quality of service at the
Nursing ~ome. He stated he feels the Board is united in its
support cf the Nursing Home.
Mr. Barber stated he concurs with the comments expressed by Mr.
Warren. He further ~tated him father wa~ ~n a nursing home and
his grandmother is currently a resident of a nursing ~ome. He
stated he was concerned about the ~auner in which expansion of
the Lucy Corr Nursing Home would take place and he felt every
option needed to be explored prior to the Board taking action,
He further stated ~e feels t~e public/private partnership with
Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) is a good opportunity for
the county and supports the plan before the Hoard.
Mr. Panini stated he has ~upported full funding of the Nursing
public/prtvnte partnership. He further mtated the expansion
and upgrades at the Nursing Moms is needed, however, there are
still issues to address before the project c~n be moved
forward. Be stated the County recently received an award for
total quality improYemunt initiatives and since the Board has
voiced its s~ppo~t for the ~2.$ million needed to match the
private sector, he fe~ls it is tin~ for the Board to e~power
the necessary individuals and allow them to move forward with
this project as expeditiously as possible.
Dr. Nicholas stated he feels the Board will do the right thing
for the Nursing Home at the appropriate time.
95-305 5118/95
__ ~ I I__L t ] L ..... i
Mr. McHale directed the County Administrator and Health Center
Commission staff to resolve any necessary i~ues in orde~ for
the Board to vote on this issue at its meetin~ on June
Mr. ~cHale %hen called £or %ha vote on %ha mo%ion made by him,
seconded by Mr. Warren, ~or ~ke soard to defer consideration of
an amendment to the FY94-95 Budget to appropriate and
$1,tQO,QOO from the County's Reserve for Capital Projects to
give to the Health Center Commission for construction of a new
nursing Rome faoility until June 14,
Vote: Unanimous
iS.R. TO ~ON~IDER A~CE~T~/~CE OF ~EDER~L I~N~ ~TATE AIR,CRT
IHPROV~H~ GRANTS FOR INSTALLATION OF GLIDESL~
EOUIPMENT ~ RTNW~Y~PHOACH LIGHTING ON RU~AY
~3 ~D IESTALLATIO~ OF R~AY APPROACH LIGHTING
FOR RUNWAY 15 AND APPROPRIATION OF ALL ~DERAL, STATE,
public hearing te consider acceptance of federal an~
~quip~e~t ~nd runway approach lighting on ~unway ~3
in~tallatlon of runway approach lightinq for Runway 15 and
NO one came forward fo speak in favor or against thin
authorized the County Adlainistrator to accept Federal Aviation
Administration (F~A) and Virginia Department of Aviation
Grants for various projects end enter into contracts with the
authorized the County A~m~ni~trator to enter into oontraot~
with the applicable lowest responsive and responsible bidders;
and eppropriat~ all federal ($125,716), State ($595,13s}, and
County ($24,?~?) funds allocated for thes~ project~
installatlon of glidesloDe equipment an~ runway approach
lightin~ on Runway 33 and installation of runway approach
lighting for Runway 15.
vo~e: Unanimous
AND POLLING
Kr. ~icas stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public haarihg to consider an ordinunc~ relating to precinct
boundaries and polling places. He further stated the current
location for the Point of Rocks voting precinct is the
maintenance building at Point of Roo~m Parks and
~eoo~ended new location will be Bnon Branch Library, which is
more convenient to County voters. When asked, ~e etate~
request meats ull legal requirementm, but will need to he
approved by the Justice Department.
~o one came forward to speak in ~evor of or against ~his
95-306 5/10/95
On motion of ~. MeHale, seconded by M~. Daniel, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODS OF THE COUNTY
OF CHHSTERFIEL~ 1978~ AS AMENDED, kY ~tMENDING
AND R~E~ACTING SECTION 7.1-2 1%ELATING TO
PRECINCT BOUNDARIES AND POLLING PLACES
BE IT 0RDAINEDbythe Board of Supm~vimors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) ~at Sec%ism 7.1-2 o~ the Cod~ of__the County o~
Chesterfield, 1958, as amended, is amended and r~enacted to
read a= follows:
Sec. 7.1-2. Precinct boundaries and poll.%p~ nlace~.
~ ~ollowing shall be the precinct boundaries and polling
places for magisterial districts in the county:
Point of Rocks Voting Precinct:
O O O
The voting place for Point of Roek~ Voting Preoinst ~hatl
be the Enos Library, ~801 Enos Church Road.
(2) That this ordinance ~hell become effective immediately
upon adoption.
Vote: unanimou~
15
TO ~ONSIDER TNE ROUTE 360 CORRIDOR ~LAN AND
GUIDELINES, /%ME~DME~F~E TO THE NORTH~N ~EA PL~.
TURNER ROAD CORRTDOR PL~, ~ THE THOROU~HP~E
CHESTERFIELD, 1978. AE AM~..N~.ED~...E¥ A/~ENDING AND
~EEN~CTINS SECTION 21.1 BY kMENDINS ~T~CLE VI TO ADD
a public hearing to ~onsider the Route 360 Corridor ~l~n and
dm~ign guidelines, amendments to the Northern Area Plan, the
of the County's Comprehensive Plan and an ordinance relating to
Community Planning Administrator ~or ~he Planning Department.
M~. McGarry reviewed, in detail, ~he Route 360 CorAiDorPlan
and key recommendations.
There was brief discussion r=lative to whether the property
owners were involved in the development of the Plan and their
perspective of t~e P_~, specifically, at ~t relat2s to the
corner of Route 3~o and HICKS Road; =he Plan being a vision for
~he ~tated at least twenty public meetings and ~hree 9ubllc
input on the Pla~.
~c. Jacobsen stated the concept of sstablishing special z0nlng
previous plans; that fon~ distinct visual zones have bean
the key recruited conditions. He then reviewed the proposed
~oning standards as contained in the Plan's design quldellnes.
There was brie~ discussion relative to wh~th~r the zoning
standards allows the new Co~ido~ center to be publicly or
privately owned an~ reloca~i0n of the LaPrade Branch ~ibrary
being included in the Capital Improvement Program in light of
recant structural repairs mads a~ t-he Library.
that staff, the community, and businesses have developed and
this area in the future.
Mr. Jacobsen continued to review the zoning standards of the
proposed Plan.
improvement~.
Mr. Jacobsen contlnu~d to review the zoning ~tandards of the
proposed Plan.
Mr. Jim Reglmbal, representing the Surreywcod civin
development of the Plan since its inception; that they suppsrt
th~ proposed ~lan; that Route $60 is a major artery and they
maintain and improve development in the area; and that ways are
A~oclation i~ a~i~ting in ~tabli~hi~g a ~60 Corridor
imple~enta=ion group to assist in i~proving development in the
Corridor area and they woul~ like to see Intersodel Service
Plan by the Planning Ce~u~i~iom; and stated he is not in
agreement with %he recommendation for h~ property. He
relocation of =he Lynehester Drive entrance and Gregory Pond
on h~s property. He stated he feels the changes are very
by Mr. Bates, specifically, lo¢~tion of the collector road and
representing a property owner in the vicinity of Route 360 and
property deslgnated for residential use; and submitted into the
record a cody of e map outlining the Droper=y owner's lan~.
Mr. ~ill Walton stated his property adjoln~ the focal porn:;
with the property owners and residents; that he is not in
feels t_he loop road should only be used as a development road
and not a divided highway; that he is eo~e~ned about the
chanqe to allow convenience retail u~e~ and fiat he do~s not
support tko restrictions a~companying this shanged concept.
MS, ~¢$arry clarified the convenience retail use concept adde~
retail use, specifically, as it relates to %ha Mixed Use
Hr. Leu Lombard stated he is concerned about technical
questions ~egarding the Plan's application; that he feels each
rezoning request will be decided in a piecemeal fashion; that
exceptions will be required la%ur by the Plan; that he feels
staff needs to revise the ua~ieu~ adopted plans to reflect the
not feel the proposed Plan is workable; that she is not in
Gregory Pond Roads~ an~ that she does not see how the Plan w~ll
help her to d~velop her property.
Mr. Doug Clark stated he repre~ntn the ~n~k ~s%ate; that he
unable to rezone their property; and that they are opposed to
the~.
Mrs. Elizubeth King stated she r~side~ on ~ull Street Road;
the restrictions of the Plan; and requested th~ Soard to a~end
~tat~ the Association has been involved since th~ beginning
Committee had been established wi~h over 600 individuals being
invited to attend meetings; and that the Committee hspes to
assist in the implementation of the Plan. beautification of the
further stated =be Plan is a oe~cept and requested the Board to
assess plan. He she%ed they do not feel multi-family
apartm~ntm mhould be allowed throughout Corridor; that they
feel the Plan is economic developmen~ oriented; that the
Committee is pro-developm~nt for the Corridor; and requested
in development sf the Couridor,
There was brief discussion relative ts the impact of leap-frog
9~-309 5/10/95
M~. J. W. Kyte stated he is a landowner in the Corridor; that
he feels the landowners in the Corridor are the ones most
impacted by the Plum; that he feels although the p~OpOSad Plan
is not perfect, it is a good starting point; and requested the
Bourd to give favorable consideration to the Plan.
Mr. Chuck Grsenberg stated he represents Mr. and Mrs. Robert
collector road and, opoeificatly, tho necessity cf the road and
whether a truffle study has bean conducted.
Mr. R. R. Collier stated he supports the proposed Plan; that he
is a r~sident of the Cou~aty, an owner of property on Route 360,
and a developer; that he has worked with County staff on the
Plan fox th~ past two years; that he feels the Plan is a
quati=y plan and a good starting point for the corridor~ and
that he feels the Plan represents the best for the ~om~unity.
Mr. Dick~Thite, representing Bexley Civic Associatlon~ stated
the Association supports the proposed plan; that they do not
support multi-family d~v~lop~nt in th~ focal point of th~
Corridor~ that they feel the Plan serves the purposes of the
Board ~o give favo~&ble consideration to the Plan.
Ms. Nayota Gusler, representing Forustdule civic Association,
stated they supDart tho proposed Plan; that they have boon
i~vol~ed in th~ process and she wants to stay involved; and
requested the ~uard to give favorable consider=rich to the
Plan.
Mr. Bruce Winfree stated he basically supports the Plsn~
however, he feels too many restrictions are being placed on the
Mrs. ~e!en Bailey stated she owns land o~ Gregory Po~d
e~preesed appreoia~ien to the Planning commission for the
opportunities given to ¢iti=en~ to provide input; that she
feels land is more valuable if it is beautiful; and requested
the Board to give favorabl~ consideration to the P~an.
There being no one else to address this issue, tho public
he,ring was closed.
I~ was generally agreed to recess for te~ m~nutes.
Reccnvening:
Mr. Warren ex, reused appreciation to all w~o provide~ input
into this process and stated he attended u number of th~
meetings held. He further sea=ed =here wa~ a spiri% of
cooperation and partnership t~ develop thi~ area with pride.
~e inquired a~ to the flexibility of transportation needs as
they relate to the Bates' property.
M~. McCrack~n stated the Corridor and the proposed Plan would
more accommodating for the Bates and location of the proposed
collector ruud ia flexible.
~i~cussion, comments, and questions ensuo~ relative to concerns
exp~eused regarding transitional areas and flm×ibility in the
Mixed Ume Corridor areas of the Plan, epecifioally, the Hancock
p~operty; the proposed Plan being less remtrictive; whether the
Plan will reduce or enhance r~venue coerces; the potential
5/~0/95
re~idehtial ~se designation at the intersection of Routs 360
and Leckshire Drive and tAe possibility aZ'amending this at
some poiht in time; apartments b~ing e×clndsd from the proposed
Plan; and the extent of current apartment devel0Dment in the
County.
Mr. Daniel stated approximately forty p~rcent of the proposed
Plan ia located in Dale District and hQ feels the Plan i~ long
overdue. He further stated he feels the current Plan ia too
restrictive end the proposed Plan ~s a step in the right
direction. Ne stated properties can continue to be marketed
within the Corridor and ha feels the area should be promoted
for economic development. ~u further stated there are numerous
apartments already located in the Corridor; su~itted into the
record a letter from ~rs. Jane ~. sykes relating to concerns of
the Hancock heirs reqarding the proposed Plan'n impa~t~
restricting future development oft heir preperty; and stated he
supports the proposed ~lsn.
Dr. Niohol~s expressed appreciation to all f~r their input into
the proposed Plan. He stated he is concerned abou~ the Bates'
property and the proposed Plan should be used as a guide.
further stated he feels it ia ~ime =omovs forward with the
Plan with the intention of the Plan being flexlble to long-term
residents in ~be corridor and he supports the proposed Plan.
~r. ~c~ale stated he supports the proposed Plan a~ there has
ba~n significant public input into the ~laq, the
of the Committee to implement the Plan, and the sense ~f place
being created in the ~lan. ~e further stated he feels there ia
strong support for the proposed Plan, that the Plan provides
£1exibili~y, an~ that the Plan preparation included a market
a~alysis, therefore, he supports the proposed
Mr. WaTren stated he feels the Route 360 Corridor Plmn is the
beginning of a new planning process and direction for the
County to move forward. He directed staff to follow-up with
citizens who addressed specific issues, spaciflcally, the
Bates' eo~eer~s ahd following-up with ~arketing efforts.
expressed appreciation tu all for their efforts in development
of the preposed Plan.
Mr. Warren then made a motion~ seconded by ~r, Daniel, for the
Board to adopt the Ruute 360 Corridor Plan and design
~n]idelines, amendm~nt~ to the ~hern Area Plan, the Turner
Road Corridor Plan~ and the Thoroughfare ~iDD, elements for the
County's Comprehensive Elan and to adopt th~ fallowing
erdinanee:
AN ORDIH~/gCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF TH~ COUNTY
OF CNESTERFT~L~, 197A, AS ~G4~NDED~ BY ~]qENDIN~
AMD REENA~ING SECTION 21.1 BY AMENDING A=qTICLE VI
TO ADD A NEW DIVISION 1.~ ~/{D ADDIN~ SECTIONS 21.1-243.3
AND 21.1-243.4 I~ELATING TO DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Superviserz of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That ~krtiole VI 0£ C~apter 21.1 af the cods of tbs
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and
reenacted to add a new Division 1.1 to read as follows:
DIVISION 1.1. D~VELOP~ENT REQUIREMF, NTS~SP~CI~I~D
(2) That Section 21.1-243.3 of ~he Code of the County of
~he~te~field~ 1978, as amended, is added to read a~ follows:
areas of the county as unique and ta enhance pattern~ of
development in t~ess areas through ~hs implementation of
adopted plans and ~id~line~ which mandate particular
development requirements for such areas.
(3) That section 21.1-243.4 of the code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is added to read as follows:
Sec. 21.1-243.4. Route 360 Corridor.
All development in the Route 360 corridor, me shown on the
Chesterfield County Planning Department, dated March, 1995, and
incorporated by reference into this ordinance, shall comply
with the requirements set forth as Key Required Conditions
wit_h~n the Route 360 corridor Design ~uideline~, adopted {date
of adoption) (as amended) and incorporated by reference into
%his ordinance. The Key Required Condi~io~ ~pply whe~ever th~
~p~eifie r~quire~oRt is Dot addrens~d by thi~ chapter or by the
zoning conditions for that case or whenever the specific
this chapter, providsd, however, that ~pscific zoning
they are more or le~s restrictive than the Key Raqulred
Conditions.
immediatel~ upon adoption.
Vote: Unanimous
~E~MIT$
~". JaOob~on ~tated thi~ date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing to consider am e~dinance relating to lowering
fees for sign permits. Ne further stated the Planning
Commission and s~aff recommends approval.
Mr. LOa Lombard stated he supports t~e ordinance az i~ i~ pro-
There being no on~ else to address thi~ ordinance, the public
hearing was closed.
on motion of ~r. barber, seconded by Dr. ~icholas, the Soard
adopted the following ordinance:
AR ORDINANCE TO AMSND THE CODS OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AM=~ID~D, DX AMeNDInG
ARD REENACTING SECTION 21.1-17 RELATIN~ TO
FSSS FOR SIGN PER~ITS
B~ IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Che=terfleld
County:
(1J That Section 21.I-17 of the code of the county of
read as follows:
Sec. 21.1-17. Pe~s for heerinC~_
The cost of each hea~in~ requested pursuant to the
provisions of this chapter, inoludinq advertieement when
requiredi shall be as fcllow~ and shall be deposited
simultaneously with the filing of the application or petition:
(1) Temporary m~qno for which $
building pe~its mre r~qui~d,
ae permitted by Sections 21.1-
l~(3)a,b,c, and d
[2) All other signs for which 100~0O
b~ilding pa~its are required
OQQ
i~%mmdiately upo~ adoption.
Vote: Unanimous
TO CONSIDER A~ORDINA~OE TO VACATE A PORTION OF LI%NCP~FT
Mr. Stith stated this date and time has been advertised for a
public hearing ~c consider an ordinance to vacate a portion of
Lancraft Road within Ben Air Knotl~ ~ubdivisien.
No one ca~e fozwa~d to speak in favor of or against this
ordinance.
on motion of F~r, ~arber~ seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the ~oard
adopted the following ordinance:
A~ ORDTN~C~ whereby the COUNTY O~ CMES~ERFIELD, VIRGINIA,
("G~AETOR") vacutem to ST. MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH and H. C.
FAR~R and ~O.~/~NE J. FARNER~ (husband and wife), ("GRAnTeE"),
a portion of Lancraft Road, (formerly Willis Road), within Ben
Air Knolls Subdlvi~icn, (formerly Ben Ai~), MIDLOTHIAN
Magisterial Dimtrict, chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown
on a plat thereof duly recorded in T2%e Cler~'e o~fiee of the
circuit Court of Chesterfi=Id County in Plat Book 4, at Pagem
1~9-141,
WHEREAS, ST. MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH and H. C. FARMER
and JEANNE J. EA~LMF~R, (husband and wife], p~titiened the Board
of Supervisors of chesterfield Ccunty~ Virginia to vacate a
portion of Lan~raft Road, (formerly Willis Road), within ~on
Air ~nolls Subdivision, Iformerly Ben Air), MIDLOTHIAN
Magisterial District~ Chesterfield Counby, Virginia more
particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 4, at Pag~ 13~-
141, by LOUISVILLE R~AL ~STATE AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, revised
by W. W. LaPrade and Brother~, dated May 1, 1928. Th= per,ion
of right o~ way petitioned to be vacated i~ more fully
d~scribsd as follows:
A portion of Lancraft Road, (formerly willis
RoadJ, within Ben Ai~ Knolls Subdivision,
(formerly Ben Air}, =he location of which is
more fully shown on the above ~enticned plat,
a copy c~ which is attached hereto and mede e
part of t~ie Ordinance.
9~-313
~{EREAS, notice has been giYan pursuant to Section 15.1-
431 of the Code of Virqini~, 19§0, as amended, by udv=rtising~
and,
WHEREAS, nu public necessity exists for ~he ¢ontinuanu= of
the portion cf right of way sought to be vacated.
NON THeREFORe, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to section 15.1-482(b) of the Co~e of
V~, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion Of riqbt of
way be and is hereby vacated.
GRANTEE hereby conveys unto the GP~NTOR and GRANTOR hereby
easements across the portion of right of way to be vacated, as
shown on the attache~ plat.
Thio Ordinance shall be in full £oroe and eSSect in
accordance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia,
19~0, as amended, and a certified CORy of this Ordinance,
togmther with the plat uttached hereto shall be ~eco~ded no
sooner than thirty dayu hereafter in the Clerk's 0flies of the
Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, virqinia purmuant to
se=tlon 15.1-485 of ~he Code of Vireinia, 195Q, au amended.
Tho effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 1~.1-4S3
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the
portion of the plat vacated. Thio ordinance shall vest Cee
mimple title to the centerline of the portion right of way
~ereby vacated in ~he owners o~ the ab~ting lste within Eon
Air Knolls Subdivision~ (for~mrly Ben Air) fre~ and clear cf
any rights of pRblio uss.
Accordingly, this Ordinance ~hall be indexed in the names
of the County of Chesterfield as GRANTOR, and ST. ~ICHA~L'~
EPISCOPAL CHURCH and H. C. FAR~ER and ~OANNE J. FAI~MER,
(humband and wlf~l, or their ~ucc~mmorm in title, am GRANTEE.
Vote: ~nanimou~
~r. stith stated thi~ dat~ and ~im~ ha~ been a~vertise4 for a
public hearing to con~ider an ordinance to vacate a portion cf
Byrd Avsnue within P~tersburg-Heigh~s Subdivision.
No en~ came forward =o speak in favor of or against this
ordinaece.
On motion of Mr. MeHele, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANC~ whereby the COL~NTY O9 CNESTER~I~LD, VIRGINIA,
(.~RANTOR,,) v~cate~ ts the TRUSTEES OF IVEY MEMORIAL U~IT~D
METHODIST CHURCh, ("GRANTEE"), a portion of Byrd Avenue within
Pe=~r~urg-He~g~t~ Subdivision, BE~DA
Chesterfield Co~ty, Virginia, as =hewn on a plat thereof duly
re~orded i~ the Cl~rk~s offio~ Qf the Circuit cour~ of
Ch~mterfield County in ~lat ~ook
WHEREAS, the TRUSTEES OF IVEY MEMORIAL UNITED METKODIST
CHURCH p~titioned ~he Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
county, virginia to vacate a portion of Byrd Avenue within
Petersburg-Height~ Subdivioion, BEP~UDA Magisterial Dis~rict,
Che~terflel~ County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat
~s-~
cf record in the clerk's Office of the c~r~ult Court ef said
County in Plat Book 4, at Pages 68-69, dated~L%Y lB, 192g. The
perticn cf right cf way petitioned to be vaoated is more fully
described as follows:
A portion of Byrd Avenue, the location
which is more fully shown on the above
mentioned plat, e copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part of thi~ Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been give~ pursuant to Section 1B.1-
WHEREAS, nO public necessity exi~t~ fort he continuance of
the portion of r~ht of way sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Cod~ of
Vireinia~ I~5~, me m~ended, the aforesaid portion of right of
way be and is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall b~ in £ull force and effect in
accordance with section 15.1-482(b) Of the Code cf Vircinia,
1~0, as amended, and a certified cody of this Ordinance,
together with t~e plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty day~ hereafter in the Clerk's o££iQe of the
Circuit Cou~t of Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to
Section 15.1-4S5 of the Code of Virginia, 1960, as amended.
The effect of this O~dinanee pursuant to section 15.1-483
is to destroy the force end effect of the recording of the
portion of the plat vacated. This oroinanee shall vest fee
simple title of th~ portion of right of way hereby vacate~ in
the property ewnsr of the abutting lots within Petersburg-
Heights Subdivision, free and clear of a~y rights of public
Aocer~ingly, this ordinance shall be indexed in the names
of the County of C~hesterfield as G~/TTOR, and th~
IVeY M~MORIA~ UNITED METHODIST CHURCh, or their successors in
title, as G~T~.
X~.M. TO CON$IDENAN ORDINANCE TO %~AO~TE A PORTION O~
NORM~NDAL~ T~RR~CE INCLUDING A PORTION 0~ARCADIA AVENUE
Mr. Stith stated this date and time ham been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an crdinnncs to vacate a portion of
~orma~dalc Terrace includin~ a Dortlon of Arcadia Avenue.
~o on~ came forward tu speak in favor of or against thi~
On ~otion of M~. HcMale, seconded by Dr. Nicholas, the Doard
adopted the following ordinance:
~ Q~DINANCE w~ereby the COQq~T~ OF C~EST~RFI~LD, VIRGINIA,
('?GP~NTOR") vacates to DONALD R. MCCABE and BOBBIE ~. ~CCAB~,
("G~ART=~"), a portion of Normandale Terrace Subdivision
including a portion of Arcadia Avenue, B~UDA Magisterial
D~s=r~ct, ~terfield County, Virginia, a~ ~hown on a plat
thereof duly recorded August 4, 1948 in 2h~ Clerk's office of
the Ciro~it Court of Chesterfield County in Deed Book 340, Page
~EREAG, DONALD R. NCCABE petitioned the Board of
Supervisors oS Chesterfield County, Virginia to va~at~ a
portion of Normandale Terrace Suk~ivision including a portion
o% Arcadia Avenue, BEP24UDA District, chester£1eld County,
Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record in the
Clerk's O~flce of the Circuit Court Of said County in Deed Book
340, Page 213. The portion of subdivision petitioned to be
vacated is more fully described as follows:
A Dertion Of Normandale Terrace subdivision
including a portion of ~cadia Avenue, the
location of which is more fully shown on a
plat made by CHARLES C. TOWNES AND ASSCCIATES,
P.e., dated JAI~U~Y 3, 1995, and revlsad APRIL
20, 1995t a copy of which is attached hereto
and made a part of this ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-
431 o~ the Co~e of Virq~%i~, 1950, as amended, by advertising;
the portio~ of su~ivi~ion ~ought to b~ vacated.
OF CHESTE~IELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section I5.1-482(b] of the Code of
Virqinia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid ~ortion of
~ubdivision be and is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
ac=or,anco with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Vlrulnia.
1950, as amended~ and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat at,ached hereto shall be recorded no
~ooner ~an thirty days h~r~after in th~ Cl~rk'n Offic~ of th~
circuit Court of Chesterfield County~ Virginia pursuant to
portion of the plat vacated.
o~a County o~ Chmsterfiald as G~TOR, and DCNALD R. MCCA~Z
~nd BOBBI~ S. MCC~R, or their successors in title, as G~T~.
1Z, ~DJOURNMENT
On motion e~ Mr. Daniel, secon~e~ by Mr. Mca{ale, the Board
adjourned ~t 10:30 p.m. until May 15, 1995 at 7:15 a.m. for a
breakfas~ meeting with citizens for Responsible Gouernment at
LB'~ Restaurant.
Lane B. ~%amssy ~/
County Administrator
a.L. ~cBale, biII
95-316 5/10/95