Loading...
11-13-96 Minutes~NU~$ ~. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman }tr. Arthur 5. Warren, Vice Chrm. ]4r. Edward B. Barber ~Lrz. Renny B. Humphrey N~. J. L. MoHalk, III ~Lr. Lane B. Rnmmey County Administrator staff in Attendance: Chief Carl Baker, Police ~e~rtmen% M~_ C~ei9 Bryant, Dir., Ms. Marilyn Cole, county Administrator ~e. Faith L. Davis, Clerk to the Board Mrs. Doris R. De,ar=, Aast. Co. Admin.~ Int6rg~vsrn. Affairs Fire Department Mr. ~ichael Gold.n, Dir., Parks and Recreation Deputy Co. Admin., Kanagem~nt Servio=u ~4r. Russell ~arris, County Ombudsman Mr. Donald Kappel~ Dir., Public Affairs Mr. Robert L. 5smart Service~ Dir., Transportation M~. Riohard ~. Dir., Env. County Attorney Mr. Francis ~. Pitarc, Dir., General Mr. William D. Poole~ bit., Budget ~ Mr. M. D. Stith~ JE,, D~puty CO, Admin,, Communi=y Development Mr. Daniel called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at 3:1~ p.m. Mr, Daniel stated that any issue un the recent Bond Referendum passed by over seventy percent and the greater of any issue was $chools~ which passed by apDroRimately eighty-three percent. He further stated that the Referendum passed bacaus~ of sound doo%t~entetio~ rel&ti~ to th= programs; suund documentation and euppor~ of ~he financial structure to assure the issu~ can be fa~ded i~ u timely mann=r; total commitment of the ~lected staff, in conjunction with the citizen~ at-large can coI~unicate 96-638 in a timely Manner- He statsd the ~oard is csmmltted to assuring the Referendum be carried out to The schedule that was communicated to the public. Mr. Daniel stated that the County's professionals will find will prosecute to the fullest ~t~nt and that he mopes, at that in Chesterfield County. Me further stated that ~he COunty will continue to ta~e steps to ensure crime is kept to a Minimum and as to the way the County's Police and Public Safety Deportments regarding crime in the County and stated that the information ne~ds citizen help in addreasing crime. ~ further stated that On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by ~r. Barber, the board approved th~ ~i~te~ e~ October 23, 19~ as mub~itted. Vote: Unanimou~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS Fn~. Ramsay introduced Chief Baker to brie~ %he Boar~ on a~tivities the Police DeDsrtment is conduot~nq at Cloverleaf Mall and in the entire Midlethian Corridor. He o~ated that the County will Dub £erth all its efforts to solve the recent erim~ committed at Cloverleaf M~ll. Chief Baker stated the Police D~part~ent began a community policing prejsot on Ootober 1, 1995 in the Route 60 corridor to reduce and prevent crime in the stet. He furthsr stated that a community police officer i5 stationed in the Corridor; that orim~ prevention semlners have been conducted; that ~ecu~ity assessment surveys have been cold,chad of all the business in the area; and that there have been problem ~olvimg initiatives at Cloverleaf Mall and noted that Crim~ 9reventlen Month Kick- off wa~ held at Clov~rlea£ Mall, He further stated that ~hro~ghout the summer, the Police Department tarqeted Cloverleaf Mull because of problems with gang~ an~ drug activity and noted that in one weekend, the Department made twenty arrests. Me stated that there has be~n a fifteen percent decrease ~n crime in =he Rou~e 6O corridor since January-September, 1995 to January-September, ~99~. ~e ~tated that robberies are down thirty=eight ~ercent in the Corridor since the community p~lieing project b~gan. Ke further ~ta~ed that the Police Department is increasing the pelic~ preaenc~ in Cloverleaf Hall and other malls and that u£f-dnty policemen will be contracted by Cloverleaf Mall for seven day~ per week versus the surrent three daya per week. He ~ta~ed that the Department is establishing a police information/assistance booth in Cloverleaf Mall and in other areas of the County; that random hike patrol has been implemented at Cloverleaf Mall this week; ~hat two motorcycle officers are covering this area from 10:00 a.m. to 1Q:QQ p.m.~ ~hat special police unite have been assigned to the Mall for weekends; and that the beat officers will increase business e~eeks in the Mall. He further stated that the Street Drug Enforcement Unit and the Anti-Crime Task Force has been assigned to concentrate its efforts on the Route 60 Corridor; that the Department will begin instructing County ~usinesses ~bout safety in the workplace; and that all officers above the 96-659 ~nlmum staffinq will bs working the Route 60/360 Corridor; and that the Department is in the process of making an appllcation for ten additional officers for the COPS Program. He expressed appreciation to the men and women of the Police Department for their efforts relating to this crime and stated that much effort is being put into this case. He stated the Departmsn~ will break this crime and ensured the public that this is an i~oluted incident and both the Malls on this Corridor are entirely safe. He encouraged anyone with any information on the~e crimes to please come forward. Mr. Daniel reassured the public that these same types of prophecies are being applied not only to th~ Route 60 Corridor, bu~ to other areas of the County as well. Mr. Barber stated the= he met with two businessmen employed on the Midlothian Corridor in which one of them suggested that he was looking into the concept of having the business community fund a mobil~ office that is visual to the community and functional to the Police D~partment in an effort to help the Police Department. Chief Baker stated this type of ~ndaavor would be of great assls:ance to th~ Police Department. ~r. Warren commended Chief Be~e~ a~d his staff for their professional response in =his particular Mrs. ~umphrey mtated that sh~ ~hops a% Clovsrlsaf Kall and that there is incraused police pr~ence at ths Mall. She further stated that thim incident has heightened tho orime awareness on the Midlothian Corridor and that citizens are happy to see the police prsssnes at the Mai1. Mr, ~amsey introduced Dr. Eugene P. Trani, President o~ Virginia Commonwealth university, to brief the Board on the status of the v~rginia Biotechnology Research Park and Engineering School. Dr. Trani ¢ongrauulated the Board members and Ceun=y citizens on the passing of thc Bond Referendum. H~ e×presee~ appreciation for t~e county's invsstment in Virginia Commonwealth University's {VCU) School of ~ngineering and the Virginia Biotechnology Research Park. ~e state~ hi~her ~dueation in VCU is positioning itself as a partner in economic development and noted t~at a major restructuring in Virginia is resulting in savings of approximately $100 million system-wide. ~e further stated that 21,6~1 students are a=:ending VCU this fall and tha~ ~400 of those students are from Chesterfield County. Me stated £~o~ Chesterfield County; that Chenterfield i~ represented in the college o~ ~umanitie~ and science and in all ten schools at VCU; and that Che=terfi~ld residents ~ajer in seventy-taxes difTerent un~ergradua%~ disciplines, seventy different graduate program~, and all thre~ professional programs. He further stated that 512 Chesterfield residents received d~gr~ and certificates ~his past year; that over sixty-~iv~ percent VCU's alumni ~eside in the Co~onweulth; and that 15,101 alumni re~ide in Chesterfield County. ~e briefly reviewed educa=ion~l levels and annual income and reviewed era~ of economic development in Virginia including chemical-synthesis; high-to,h; and biotechnology. He stated ~at ~iqh-tech centers in th~ U.S. include North carolina, Massachuee==s, California, and Texas and Fevie~ed the f~ctio~s of major re$earch university's for Oo~idor, from Charlottuuville to Richmond to Newport N~ws will most likely become one of the major ~uminams l~cations in country. He then reviewed VCU's School of Bngineering including hiring of extraordinary faculty members; ~e focusing on 11/13/96 medicine and ~anufacturing; and starting the Bioteoh coD~truction prejec~ on DecemBer 1, 1996, which will provide two additional buildlng~. Me reviewed VCU's Virginia Biotechnology Research Park including four of the five buitdinqs being constructed -- three buildings being 100 percent occupied and VCU, in cooperation with the Greater Rich~oDd Partnership, have engaged in a $90,000 campaign to attract pharmaceutical biotechnology companies to the Michmond metropolitan area. reviewed vcu health care and stated VCU's health mymtem is taking the lead through satellite health car~ services; having an integrated f~culty p~a~tioe plan; being a partner with primary car~ physicians over Chesterfield County un,er the na~e of "Co~onwealth'Care of Virglnia~ Incorporated,"; conducting the Richmond Urban Primary Cars Initiative (RPUCI); and the de~le~ment of the MCV Hospital Authority. He requested the County to Continue to support the inulusien ef MVC Hospitals and physicians ~n the County's healt~ ear~ offerings. Mr. Daniel ~preeeed appreciation to Dr. Trani for ~h~ ~e stated that h~ ~n~orses what ~es been presented and feels Dr. Trani is truly a regional leader. Th~ro wore ~o ~oard Co~mittee ReporSs at this ti~e. REQURBTS TO POSTPONE ~CTIONz ADDITIONS. OR On motion cf Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board replaced Item 6.A., Work Session on the Recommendations of the Watershed Management Committee Relating to CAe Swift Creek Reservoir Wat~r~hed; added Item ~.R.~_~ A~option of Resolution Recognizing Nove~a~er 18, 1996 as '~Metropclitan Richmond Day'~ to fellow Iter~ 8.B.13., Designation of Right-Q£-Way and TWO Variable width Virginia Department of Transportation D~ainage Easements for Riverto~ Ridge; and added Item 10.D.~ Executive Session Pursues= to Section ~.1-344.A.3., ~.o~e of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss the botential sale of County-owned Real Estate in =he Dale District and~ adopted the agenda, as amended. Vote: Unanimous RE~OL~TIONS AND SPECIAL R~C~GNITIOWS were no Resolution~ and Special Recognltion~ at this time. ~r. Stith stated that the Board of Supervisors appointe~ a Watershed ~an~gement Co~u~itte= to review variouslssue~ relating to the swift Creek Reservoir, Lake Chesdin, an~ Falling Creek Watersheds. He introduce~ ~. Joan SalYatl to brief ~he Roard ~n the swift Creek Reservoir Watershed. ~s. Salvetl stated that the Watershed Management Co~mlttee ha~ for the upger Swift creek Watershed. eh= further stated that the objective was to utillze analytical, technical expertise to furthmr refine the stra%e~ie~ end day=lop specific implement 94-641 items and receive input from appropriate aunslde agencies. She briefly reviewed the membermhip of the Committee and noted th~ Ce~ittee reflects a diverse array of ~takahclder~ -- both parties who would be most affected by any watershed plan for any of the three critical watersheds. She then reviewed the recommended goals and strategie~ of the Committee including establishing an in-lake phosphorus concentration of 0.50 mg/I as residential development being .22 pounds per acre per year; Using regional best management practice faoilities where there are technically feasible sites; using various alternative t~hnclogie~ after being subjected to a testing program briefly reviewed the testing program. ~r~. H~mphrey excused herself f~om the meeting. Ks. salvati co,tin,ed to ~eviuw the Ccmmittee'm recommendations including the Couuty seeking fends to initiate a testing ~rogram for alternative BMP technologies; the County continuing to work with tho uirginia Department of Transportatian to encourage the new State roads; the County continuing the Swift Creek Reservoir and Tributary sampling program; and making public monies available for any or all o~ the stre=egies recommended by the ~rs. ~umphrey r~turned to the meeting. ~s_ Salvati stated that tho Committee went through an exhaustive made. She further mtated that it iS staff'i recommen~atiun ~hat the Committee's proposals be remanded to the Planning Commission for their consideration and ~ecommendations. ~he suggested the Board direct staff to conduat a study of possible funding implementation of the proposals. Discusslon~ co~nts, and questions ensued ~elativa to there being a way to measure the exact amount of pollution in ~en a~ked, Ms. Salvati stated that other strat~gi=s reco~endeO by the co~itte~ are policy issues rather than ordinance issues, ~hat Wa~ recommended to be incorporated into un ordinance. ~. Warren expressed app~aiation to Ms. Salvati for her Management Committe~, ~ecognizing her efforts in ~eflnln~ ~ issue~ surroundinq the protection of thiz body of water. stated that th~ ~omments and questions that have bmen ma~ point cut the need to refine thi~ i~ua into a final policy ~etermination that would cume back to thm B~ard. ~. Warren then made a motion, seconded bye. M=Hale, fat the =o the Plannin~ Commission for =heir consideration and Mrs. Humphrey co~nded Ms_ Salvatl for her efforts r~lating'to this issue and urged the Planning Co~is~ion to keep in mind ~e Appomattox River area as it review~ these reco~ndatio~$, ~urther ~tated that =he fe~l~ this doc~me~t should be ~eviewed by the farming community, the forestry co~unity, an~ oth~r$ M~. Daniel directed staff to recognize the me, ers of th~ Walerghed Committee for %h~i~ efforts through a re~ulu~ion. 96~642 Mr. Dan%el then called for the vote on the motion m~de by Mr. proposale of tho Watershed Management Committe~ to the Planning Commission for their censideration and reoommendstlon~. ~Lr. Daniel slated that, at the request of Mr. Wa~e~, the 1997 I~sgi~latlve Work Sea,ion will be heard at the end of th~ ~v~ning session o~ the meeting. There was brief discussion relative to staf~ m~ c~ndu~ting a s~udy of possible funding options for th~ propo~e~ m~osure$ and initiating a plan for %he implementation of the propogal~ until reee~mendatien~ are brought back from the ~lannimg co~is~ion. Mr. Daniel advised the County Ad. this%rs%or that it was an Adminlstra~ive decision as to whether ~taff would be directed to proceed with conducting a study of possible funding options fo~ ~he proposed messure~ and initiatin~ a plan fo~ the approved the following ntr~etlight installation oust approval~ in the Dale Magisterial District: Comt to install light: * Southmoor Rood, vicinity of 4960 cost to install light: $674.64 On motion of Mr. MeHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board suspended its rules at this time to allow simul=aneeua nomination/appointment of a member to sarv~ on the Compr~henslve Services Policy and Management Team. Vote: Unanimou~ On ~etion of Mr. McHale, s~ocnded by Mr. Barber, the ~oard simultaneonely nominated/appointed MT~. Barbara Crew~, representing the Chesterfield County School Division, to serve on the Comprehensive service~ Policy and Management Team, whose term is effective immediately andwill expire at ~he pleasure of vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr, ~cH~le, seconded by Mr. Barber, tho Bea~d withdrew Item 8.B.6.a., Set Date for Publ±~ Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendment~ to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation ordinance and the Upper Swift Creek Watershed Ordinance. Vote: Unanimous 8.B.1. ~2)OPTION OF RESOLUTION BUPPORTING ~O~3d{ONTAS BTAT~ Thare ~a~ brief discussion rmlative to the proce=~ u~d re~estlng the County ts a~opt %hi~ re~olution. ~rs. ~umDhr~y requested tha~ any further written currespondenc~ be included in the Board packet ~s it retards to Sta~e Park. She clarified that this road proposal ia unrelated adopted the following resolution: developed Dy the Cu~nwealth of Virginia as a recreational adjoining co~ntles; and recreational access funds a~ =et forth in Section the Code Df ~i.rginia, require~ joint aotionbythe Department of ~=~AS, a ~tat~mant of policy agreed upo~ between the said ~EREAS, it appears to th~ soar~ that all re~i~ements Section 33-136.3 of the Code of Vir~inla~ an4 ~ER~S, ~e right-of-way o~ the proposed ac~'r0ad is DTOVided by the Commonwealt~ of Virginia at no cost to W~ER~S, the Board acknowledges ~hat pursuant to provi&ions cf Section 33.1~233 of the Code of Virginia, this road shall be dssignated a "virginia B~ay'* and reco~ends the appropriate action to i~ple~ent this designation. Further, the Board agr~em, that in k~e~ing with the intent of Section 33.1-63 of the Code of V%Aq. inla, to use it~ good 11/13/96 96-644 ~ IL .... J ........... [ L , access funds be allocated for an access roes to serve said facility. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED~ that th~ Commonwealth Transportation Board is hereby requested to allocate the necessary recreational access funds to the Virginia Department of Trans~ortatio~ to provide a ~uitable access road as hareinb=fore described. Vote: Unanimous APPROVAL TO INITIATE AN APPLICATION FOR RE~OMIN~ FROM RESIDENTIAL TO ~SIOEMTIAL MULTI-FAmILY WITH CONDITIONAL U~E PLlkNN~D D~V~LOPM~NT TO initiated an applloation for rezoning from Residential IR-7) to Residential Mu]ti-family (R-NF) with Conditional Use Planned AWARD OF CO~TRACT FOR THE MKADOWDALE BOULEVARD DUNDAS ROAD CO.UNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GR~T When asked, Mr. Thomas Ta71o~ stat~ that this project will not delay any othe~ projects. O~ motion Of Mr. MoRels, seconded by Mr. ~arber~ the ~oard authorized t~e County Adninlstrater ts award a contract to Simons Contracting, Tncorporated~ in the a~c~% of $145,$4S, for the Meadowdale Boulevard Community DeveloDment Block Grant Project; authorized the County Administrator tQ award a contract to simons Contracting~ Incorporated, in the amount of for the Dundas Road Community Development ~lock Grant Project; and transferred $27~750 from the Community Develspment Block Grant Program Income Fund~ to th~ Dundas Road Co~unity DeveloD~ent Block Grant Project. Vote: Unanimous S,B.4. TRaNSFeR OF T~ OE~ RO~D FUNDS ACROSS ~ANATEE ROAD The Clerk read the following ~tatement into the record: "Mr. Bill Welton~ representin~ Jam~s Minor, requested that his input be entered into the record as it related tc ~he barricade of ~anatee Road. Ne feels citizens are using this road to dump trash and that Virginia ~ower subccnt~acturu are cutting lim~s and yarrows debris off of right-of-ways and other areas and dumping this d~hris On Manatee Road." on motic~ of Mr. MoHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Beard transferred $i~0 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to the Environmental Engineering Department fo~ the Construction of a barrlcad~ aorogg Mana~e~ Road. Vote: Unanimous transferred $1,000 from the Clover Nill Distriot Three cent Road Fund to the School ~oa~d to purchase eheet music for th~ Clover Hill Marching Band and to defray a portion of the entry fees for the band to participate in the All-District Band Competition. Vote: Unanimoue 8.B.5. STATB ROAD ACCE~?k!,ICE Thi~ day the County Environmental En~ineer~ in accordance ~ith directions from this Board, made re~ort in writing upon his ~xa~ination of the roads in So~thcr~ek, Suction 1~ Bermud~ District, and Whereas, th~ R~sldsnt ~ngineer for ~he virginia Depu=tment of Transportation has advised the Director of ~nvironmental ~ngin~ering, the street (s) in $outhoraek, section 1, Bermuda Di~t~iot, meet the re~uirement~ ~tabli~hed by th~ Subdivision Street Reouirements of the Virginia Department of T~anspo~t&tion, and WheTe&s, the County and t~e Virginia Department of Transportation have entered in=o an agreement, recorded in Deed Book 2453, Paqe 405, January 21, 1994, for all ~tor~water detention/retention facilities in ~a county. Therefore, upon consideration whereof~ and on motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, it is resolved that the reade in Southcreek, Section 1, Bermuda District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and ie hereby requested to take in=o the Secondary System~ pursuaat ho Section 33.1-~9, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision street Requirements, the following: Name of ~treet: Southcreek Drive Prom: Woods Edge Road, State Route 620, 8.03 mile south of Walthall Creek Drive, State Route 40~7 To: Broadbill Driv~ 0.2~ ~ile east of Woods Edge Road~ State Route 620 Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 90 feet. Name of Street: Crayfish Court Pro~: End of cul-de-sac, 0.Q4 mil~ southweet of $outhcreek Drive TO: Soutboreek Drive~ 0.06 milo cast of Woods ~dge Road, State Route ~20 Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width; 50 fe~t. Na~e of Street: Crayfish Terrace From: Southcreek Drive, 0.06 mile east of Wood~ Edge Road, State Route S2O Tu: End of cul-de-sac, 0.54 mile north of Southcreek Drive Guaranteed Right-cf-Way Width: 50 feet, Name of Street= Jumping Mallard Place From: Southoreek Drlve~ 0.~6 ~il~ ~ast of Woods Edgo Road, State Route 620 96-646 Length: 0,~ mile Length: 0.04 milo Length: 0.04 mile Length: 0.09 mile To: End of cul-de-sac, 0.09 milk no~th of Soathoree~ Drive Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width! ~0 feet. Nome of Street: Broadbill Drive ~ength: ~.12 mile Prom: ~euthcreek Drive, 0.24 mile east ~f Woods Edge Road, State Routs 6~ End of cul-de-sac, 0.12 nile north of $outhcr~ek Driv~ ~uarenteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet. clear zone and d~gignate~ virginia Departmen~ of Trau~Dortation ~aina~e easements indicated on th~ development plat~ These roads serve 32 lots. This section of Southcreek is recorded a~ f~llows: S~ctien 1~ Plat BoOR 81, Pages 36 and 37, June 30, 1993, This day th~ County Environmental Engineer, An a~Qordoncs with directions from this Board, ~a~a re,art in writing upon his examination of the roads in ~outhcreek, Section 2, Bermuda District~ and Wh~r~o~, the Resident Engineer for the virginia Department of Tronsportotion has advised the Director of ~nvArenmentai ~ngineerAng, the street (s) in Southcreek, Seo~ion 2, Bermuda District, ~eet the requirements e~tablish~d Dy the subdivision ~tre~t Requirements of tee virginia Dep&~tmcnt of Whereas, the County and th~ Virginia Department of detention/retention facilities in the County. McHale, seconded byMr. Barber, it is resolved tha~ the roads in established o~ ~ublic reads. ~d be it further resolved, that the virginia Department of Trensportntion, be and i~ hereby requested to toke into tho the following: State Route 620 Woods Edge Road, State Route 620 Guaranteed Right-of-way Width: 60 feet. Fromz Southcreek Orive, 0.~2 ~ile east TO: End. cf cul-de-sac, 0.08 male G~a~anteed Right-of-Way Width: 60 feet. Guarantee~ Ri~h~-of-Way Width: 56 feet. 9~-647 This request is incluslv~ of th~ adjacent SlOpe, sight distance, clear Zone and designated Virginia Department cf Transportation drainage ~a~mant~ indicated on the development plat. This ~e~tien of Southcreek is recorded as fellows: Section ~, Plat Book 86, ~ages 45 and 45, Decembe~ 12, t994. Thi~ day the Co~ty Ekvironmental Engineer, in accordanc~ with directions from this Boa~d, made report in writing upon his examination of the roads in D~er Rub, Section 9~ Eateaca District, and Wherea~, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised the Director of Enviro~ental Engineering, the street (s) in Dee~ Run, Section 9, District, ~et the r~quirements established by th~ Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and 9~n~r~a~, th~ County and ~he virginia Department of detention/retention facilities in the County. ~cHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, it is re~olvad that the roads in established as ~ublic roads. And ha it further resolved, that the virginia Department of virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, the followlng: To: Exisking Secretariat Drive, ~uaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance, drainage easements indicated on the development plat. This se~tlen of Deer Run is recorded as follows: 11/13/96 ~OUNTY OF CHESTERFI~Lb, 1~?~, A5 ~/~E~DBD0 BY ADDING AND ENAOTINO SECTION 21.1-212.~ RRLATINO TO On motion of Mr. MoHale, seconded by Mr. Barbsr, the Board set the date of Deoember 11, ~996 ~t 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing to con~ider an ordinance to a=end the Code o~ ~he County of ~hesterfield, 1978, as amended, by adding a~d enacting Section 21.1-212.2 relating tO development re~ulrements for retention or dete~tio~ basin~ in the development standard~ ~ectlon of th~ zoning ordinance. Vo~e; Unanimous ~..B.6.o. TO ~ONSi~ER TN~ CENTRAL ARE~ PLAN On motion of ~r. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board eenside~ the Central Area Plan. Vote: Unanimou~ ~.B.7. AUTHORIZATION TO AID ATACK PROPERTIES, INCORPO~T~D ~X~RCI~.~MTN~NT DOMAIN FOR TH~ ~CO~ISITION OF A FOOT ~EWER ~ABBMENT AND TWO TEN FOOT CONSTRUCTION On motion of Mr. NcHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, tho authorized Right of Way staff to aid Atack Properties, Incorporated in the ~0quieition of a sixteen ~uut sewsr a~d %~o ~en foot temporary construction easements across property of the heirs of Joseph Myers, subject to the execution of u contract by Atack Properties, Incorporated agreeing to pay for all co~t~, and authorized the County Attorney ~o with ~inent Do~ain if ~taff i~ unable to locate the On motion of ~r. McHale, seounded by Mr. Berbe~, the Beard supported the conclusion~ reachsd in the Needs Assessment and Planning Study for expansion and renovation of the Chesterfield · uvenile Detention Home and adopted the following ~e~otuti~n: WHiR=AS, the Board of supervisors of Chesterfield County reoeqnizes that uubstunce abuse is eD¢ourage ~ersonal health for all cltizen~ of the county~ it ~RREAS, th~ Board of Supervisors has determined that it is in tke beat interest of the County to promote drug free workplace requirements for businesses that contract wi~h the County on those occasions when such requirements relate to the nature of tke goods or services aought by ~he County. of Chesterfield County, as follow~: It iz i~ t~e p~blic interest that Chesterfield County, to the extent permitted by the Virginia Public Procurement Act, the Americen~ with Disabilitiea Act, and oth~r federal and state law, contract for gooda and servicea w~th businesses that provide a drug free workplace on those oocaslens when the nature of the contract necessltate~ that all potential vendor~ provid~ a drug free workplace. To promote this public interest, the director cf purchasing is hereby directed, when legally appropriate and not contrary to the County's financial interest&~ to determine t~o~e CoUnty contracta for which it would b~ appropriate to require all potential Yendor~ to provide a drug free workplace aa a condition of contracting with th~ County. For those contr~¢ts, the ~ireeter of fu~ther directed to adopt procedures to implement thi~ policy by requlrinq vendors to certify that they have taken and will Educate their employees about the dangera of drug abuse in the workplace; 2. Provide their employae~ with effective drug co~seli~g, rehabilitation and/or employee amnigta~¢e 3. Discipline employeus who violate the requirement of a drug free workplace; and 4. ~inlmize, to the greatest extent possible, the rioka of drugs entering the workplace. Vot~: Unanimous~ "On motion of Mr. ~cHate, seconded by FL~. Barber, the Board supported the conclumio~a reached in th~ Needs Assessment and Planning Study for expansion and renovation of the Cheoterfield guvenile Detention Home and adopted the following resolution: W~R~AS, th~ ~oard Qf Supervisors of Chea~mr~ield authorized an aaaess~ent of the need for zecur% detention facilities in the County; and W~R~A~, the ~aessment has been completed and ha~ been aubmltted to the State Board of Juvenil~ Justice f0~ their oonsi~eratlon as part of the state funding assistance and WHEREAS~ the Hoard Of supervi$or~ c~ncura with and ~pre~e$ its $~ppQrt for the conclusions reache~ in the needs WHEREAS, the C~unty intends to renovate and expand existing detention facility in accordance with its adopted capital Improvement 91an and the Needs Aaae~mment which was Submitted to ~he State Board of Juvenile Justice; and Wa~F~%S, the Bosrd of SuDervis0rs fondu the operations and program in the facilities. 96-650 NOW, THEREFORE B~ IT R~$0LV~D, by tko Board cf Supsrvisors o~ Chesterfield County that ~he State Board of Juvenile Justice is hereby requested to reimburse the County for fifty (50) of the Chesterfield County Juvenile Detsntion Eome from ~ to 90 secure beds pursuant to ~irginia Code Section 16.1-309.~. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of ~upervisors of Chesterfield County hereby requests the State Board of Juvenile Justice to reimburse the County for the cost O~ personnel and operations for t~e 90 s~oure bed facility as set Vote: Unan~meu~ REQUEST TO QUITCLAi~ PORTIoNs oF BIXTZZN FOOT ~ND TEN FOOT SEWER EASEMENT~ A~EOSB WAL-MART STORES, INCORpOraTED on motion of Mr. McHale~ s~con~e~ by Mr. Barber, the Board authorized the Chairman ol the Board of Supervisors and th~ County Administrator to ex, cute a quitclaim deed ts vacate p~tion~ of sixteen foo~ and t~n foo~ sewe~ eusemunts across Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated. (It is noted a copy of ~he plat i~ filed with =he paDer~ of thio Board.) Vote: Unanimous 8.B.9.b. PORTIONS OF TWO EX~$TING SIXTEEN ~OOT WATER F~ASEMENT8 ~ROSS P~OPERT¥ OB THE PRICE COMP~d~Y On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by M~. Barber, th~ Board authorized the c~airman of the Board of Suporviscro and t~e County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed =e vacate portions of two existing sixteen foot watsr easements acre~ property of The Price Company, a California Corporation. (It is noted a copy of tho plat is filed with the papers of thi~ Vote: Unanimous EXTENZION OF OAK L~KE CO~T On motion of Mr. ~cH~le, seconded by Mr. H~rber, =he Board accepted, un behalf of the County, the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.658 acr~ adjacent to oak Lake Court for the extension of Oak Lake Cour~ from William B. D~ul and G~ne ~. Duval, end authorized th~ County Administrator to execute the the papers of this Board.) ~-651 THE TRUSTEK~ OF STOCKTON HKMO~IAL RAPTIST On motion of Mr. McEale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board accepted, on ~ehalf of the County, the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.17 acres along Claypoint Road (Route 651) from the Trustees of Stockton Namorial ~aDtlat Church, and authorized the County Administrator to execute th~ necessary de~d. (It im noted a copy of the pla~ is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimoum g.B.11. ~PPROVAL OF EEOUBBT FROM THE DEVELO~.E~.~_~LENN M. HILL AND C'F~RLES E. BAILEY_F~R A TI~E EXTENSION O~ REFUNDS On motion of ~lr. ~c~le, seconded by ~r. Barber, the ~oard approved a contract to be amended to extend the expiration date for r~funds f~r one y~ar ~rom The Developers, Glenn ~. ~ill and Charles E. Bailey. Vctm: Unanimous on motion of Mm. MeKele, ascended by Mr. Barbur, th~ Board approved a Utility Contract for the Fiv~ Forks Recreation Cente~ and Five Forks Lane Extension 9reject which pro,oct i~o!~des additional work as ~squest~d by ~h~ County ss follows and authorized the County Administrator ~o execute the necessary documents: Developer: Mulbsrry Corporation Contractor: Castle Equipment Corporation Contract Amount: Es~imat~ Total $1~0,~7~.94 Total Estimated County Cost: Additional [Cash) $ 21,460.30 Code: (Cash Refund) 5B-572WO~E4C District: Dale VIRGINIA D~RTMENT O~ TR~NSRORT&T~ON D~INAGE EASEM~TS ~OR RIVERTON RIDGE On motion of Mr. Morale, ~eco~ded by Mr. Barber, t~e Board ~fgn~bed riqht-of-w=y and two variable width virginia Dep~-tment of Transportation drainagm ~asmment~ for Riverton Ridge and authorized %he Coun=y Administrator to execute the necessary declaration. a-B-14, ADOPTION O~ RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING NOV~4~ER iZ. 199E adopted the Yellowing reaclution: W~RMAS, a true community is built on bringing together li/i3196 96-~52 WHEREAS, the health and progress of the Metrogolitan Richmond roqion is dependent on th~ full inclusion, participation, and partner~hiD of ~11 its citizens~ and W~EREAS, cooperation and collaboration among the ju~isdiction~ of ches~er£iel~, Hanover, ~enrleo, and Richmon~ will build a community of hop~, security, and opportunity for all. POW, TH~REPOR£ B~ IT RESOLVED, that ~he Cbe~terf±eld County Boa~d of Supervisors publicly r~cognlzas November 1~, all citizens to acknowledge our need for each other. Vote: Unani~ou~ There were no Hearings of ci:~z~na on Unscheduled matters or Claims at this time. accepted the following Proje=ts; District Ro~d and Street Light Funds; Lease Purchases; State Secondary System: ASCOT FOREST. SECTION B - /Effective Route 4456 (aeathstead Road) - From Route Route 4483 (Kinq~tream Lane) - From Route 44S6 ~e 0.19 ~ile ~as~ Reu~e 4486 Rout~ 4472 (Old C~eshire Lane) - From Route 44S3 to 0.09 ~ile South Route ~oute 4484 (Royal Mews Court) - ~ro~ ROU~ 4483 ~o 0.07 ~le North Route B~XL~. $~CTION 15 - (EffectiVe 10-~-96) Route 3439 (Asheroft Way) - From Route 2637 to 0.08 mile North Route Route 3443 (Walhala circle) - ~rom 2637 to 0.04 male ~orth Rou~e 2617 Route 2637 (Wulhal~ Drive) - From mile Northeamt Route ~638 to 0.~ mile ~ortheast Route 2638 BEXLE¥. $~CTION 16 - rEflect(va 10-7-96} Route 3439 (Ashoroft Way) - From mile Northwest Route ~637 to 0.05 mile Northwest Route 2637 0.12 ~i 0.19 Mi 0-07 Mi 0.05 Mi 0.04 Mi O~ 14 Mi O. 03 Mi 11/13/96 Reut~ 4~7~ (Sylvan Ridge Court) - From Route 4375 (Sylvan Ridge Place) - From Route 4558 to 6.08 mile North Route 43~8 0.08 Mi Route 4~¢ (~ylvan Ridge Road) - Prom 0.38 mile East Rout~ 4356 to 0.12 mile ~ast Route 435~ 0.26 Mi Vote: unanimous i~.D. EXEOUTIV~ ~SSION ~URS~NT TO SECTION 2.1-~44~.~., CODE OF VIRGINIA~ 1950, AS AM~NDED~ TO DIS~US~ THE ~OTENTI~L S~L~ OF COUNTY-OWNED REAL ~STATE IN TK~ On ~otio~ of Nr. B~rber, seconded by ~r. Warren, the Board went into an Executive Zambian ~ursuant to $~etion ~.1-~44A.3., cod~ Of Vircinia, 1950, as Amended! to Diaou~s the Potential Sale of County-owned R~al ~state in the Dale Qii%rie=. adopted the following re~olmtion~ O~ ~otion of ~r. ~c~ale, seconded by Nr. Warren~ the following resolution ~as adopted: WHeReAS, ~he ~oard Qf Supsrviscr~ has thi~ day adjaurnnd into E~eoutiv~ ~e~sion in accordance with a formal vote of the ~oard and in accordance with tbs provi~iems of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, th~ Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective July 1, 19~9 provides for certification that such Executive Session was ~onducted in conformity with law. NOW, THAAREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Boar~ Of Supervisors dee~ hereby certify that to the best of each member's knowledge, i) only public busine~ matt~r¢ lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under 5he Freedom of Informatio~ Act were discussed in the Executiv~ Session to which this certification applies, and ii) only such public bu~ine~ ~atters ~$ were identified in the ~otion by which tbs Executive ~ssion was cenvened were dissents from this certification. The Board ~eing pollo4, the VoCe was as follows: Mr. S¢~al~ : Aye. F~X. Daniel : Aye. 96-654 il/i3/96 on ~otion of Mr. Barber, seconded b~ M~. SeMele, the Board rec~mm~d to the Administration Euildin~, Room 502, for dinner. vot~: Unanimous INVOCATION William Peele gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ~0 THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES 0F AMERICA Modal of Honor Winner, Colonel Ca~% L. Sitter, U.S. Marine Corps (retired), led the Pledge Gf Allegiance to the Fla~ of the Uhitod States of America. On motion of Mr. MsHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board suspended i=s rules at this ~ima to amemd the agenda to add an emergency item. Vote: Unanimous am Item for the Authorization fo~ the County Administrator to Acrsm o~ Property in tho Dale Magisterial District, to follow Item ~.B., Work Sea,ion on the 1997 Lmgislative Program. Vote; Un~nimsu~ c~rl L. sit,er, U.S. Marine Corpmr who wam prmment to accept the WHEREAS, Arnimtice Day commemorated the signing of the WHF~R~S~ Veterans Day wa~ proclaimed fro~ tha~ time citizens in war; and W~E~EAS, it is fitting to affiTm our respect and support fe~ the sacrifices of our ~Xlit~ry men and women; and WHEREAS, Veterans Day is observed thi~ year on ~evember 96-6~ sacrifice for our nation and its citizens. Mr. Daniel and Y~. Rams~ presented the executed r~Ol~tion to Mr. Sitter and expressed appreciation to those who have defended our Country and recognized "V~teran~ Day", Colonel sitter ~xpr~se~ apprecia=ion for the reeognitlon, on behalf of all Veterans o~ War. $~.~B. RBCO~MI~IN~ T~E 199a C~$TBRFIELD BASEBALL CLUBS CONTINENTAL MUSTANG T~A~ ~OR THEIR OHTSTANDING Mr. Golden introduced Coache~ Richard Worcester, Dennis Moody, accept the re~olutlons. On motion of the seard, %he following ~esolutlon was adogted: W~ER~A~, participation in sports has long been an integral part of Che~teTfield County's educational, physical, and ~motional development for students; and WB~F~, the 1996 Ch~sterZial~ Bare,all clubs Mustan~ ~r. Pat Gregory, participated and ~inish~d First Place in the District Tourney%ut and ~b% East Coast Zone Tournament; and T=am advanced to the Pony Baseball's World Sarie~ in I~ing, Texas where the Team flni~hed Fifth Place -- a Tournament consisting oS teams from California, Florida~ New England, Puerto Rico, Texas, and Virginia; and WHEREAS, under the ~idance and direction of Mr. won-lost record of 6=3 and included player~ Hitch Bess~lie~e~ Chase Bryan; Adam CooDer~ Greg Edward~; $~an Gregory; Grant Howerton~ ~eaton ~oyle; Rob Moody; Will Moody; Chris ~amsey; Justin Richter; Derrick Smith; Paul Schmidt; Jacob Well~ and County Board of Supervisor~ publicly recognizes the 1996~tanq ~D, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Hoard, on b~hal~ Of the citizens of ches=erfield county, hereby commends the 199S co~itment to excellence in academics as Well as a=hle~ics and Vo~: Unanimous Mr. Daniel, Mrs. Humphrey, and ~. Warren, presented the and ~embers of the Team, congratulated them on their out~tandinq M~. Worcester expressed appreciation for the r~cognition to the parents of Team members for their ~upport_ 9~-656 0n action of the Board, the £oll~wing resulu:ion was adopted: %q{EREAS, the Bey Scouts of America was incorporated by M3~. William D- Boyce on February 8, I910; and %~q{EREAS, the Boy ~couts of America wa~ founded to citizenship ~raining, personal development, and fitnemm of individuals; and ~EREAS, altar earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his co,unity, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and WHEKEAS, Mr. Gregory J. S~aplet~n, Troop 819, by Saint John'm Epiaoopal ~uroh, has accomplished tho~e high standards of commitment and has reashad th~ long-sought goal of ~a~l~ $Gout whio~ is received by less than two percent.of those individuals entering th~ acoutin9 ~ovem~ntl and ~E~AS, growing through hi~ e~eriences in Scouting, learning the lessons of r~apon~ible citizenship, and priding himself on the qraat accomplishments of his County, Gregory in~ed a me~ber of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be v~y NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that ~he Chesterfield County Board of Supervisor~ hereby ~xt%nds its congra~ulationg to Mr. Gregory J. ~tapl~ton and acknowledges the good fortune of the Co~ty to have such an outstanding young man an c~e Of its citizens. Vote: Unanimous songratulated him on his outstanding achlmvements, a~d wished him well in hi~ Suture en~eavorm. 14.~.2, OLIVER T, BURGESS. T~? ~00 O~ motion of the Board, th~ following re~olutiun was adopted: WHeReAS, the Boy Scout~ of America was incorporated byNr. Witliam D. 8oyoe on February S, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Sscuts of A~e~iea wa~ founded to promote citizenship training, personal development, and ~itnesa of individuals; and WHEREAS, af~e~ earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in th~ troop, demonstratinq Scout ~pirit, and living up to t~e scout Oath and Lnw; and WHEREAS, Mr. Oliver T. Bur~e~s, Troop 800, sponsored by Bethel Baptist Church, has accomplished those high ~tandard~ of commi=~ent and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and 96 657 WHEREAS, growing through his e~porienoee in Scouting, learning the lessons ~f responsible citizenship, and priding indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young eltizens of whom we oan all be very proud. HOW~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to ~r. Oliver T. Burgess and acknowledg~ the good fortune of the County tc have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. Uote: Unenimeu~ Hr. Berber preaented the executed r~olution to Mr. Burgess, congratulated him on his au%standing aohievemonte~ and wis~od him well in his future endeavors. 15. RUBLIC HEARINGS FOR THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN ORDI~A~GB PROVISIONS FROM PROVISIONS~ AND FOR OTHER REIs%TED PURPOSB~ Mr. Mineks stated t~i5 date and time has been advertised or public hearing to ¢onoider an ordinance adopting a revision, reoTg&nization, and racodification of the ordinances of County of Chesterfield, Virqinia entitla~ "The cede of County of Chesterfield, Virginia;" providing for the removal of certain ordinance provisions from such code& providing for the repeal of certain ordinance p~evision~ and for ~ther related purposes. He further ~tmted ~hat effective date of the reoodification will be Makeh 31, 1997. Re stated that upon the request of =he Commissioner of Revenue, ~ke Section relating to streamlining of personal property ta×mtion of boats trailers, Will become ef£so~ive immediately upon adoption of this ordinunce. He further stated that th~ Board will be adopting t~e recodifieation o~ the entire Code in which certain portions of the Code will b~ deleted from the published portion cf the Co~e, ~o allow ~he Code te be shorter and more easily used. Mr. Barber stated that the Code i~ basically being r~numbered, retailed, and reordered. He further stated that if there ~re q~tione abe~t the COde, the Board has until March i1, 1997 to addreen the ~ue~tions. on ~otion of Mr. M~Hale, seconded by ~r. Barber, t~e Beard adopted the followinq ordinance: A~ 0RDINANC~ ADOPTIMG A R~VIMION, R~0RGANIZATIOK AND RECODIFICATION OF THE ORDINANCES OF THE COUI~T¥ OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, ENTITLED "T~E CODE OF TH~ COUNTY OF C~EMTERFIELD~ VIRGINIA~ PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF C~RTAIN ORDINANCES NOT IWCLUB~D WITH CERTAIN E~CEPTIONS~ AND FOR OTHER RELATED PUP~OSEM (1) Be It ordained by the Board of supervisors of County of Chesterfield, virginia; section 1: There is adopted Dy the Boa~d O~ Supervisors a Code entitled ~The Code of the County of Chemterfield, Virginia," containing ordinanues codisied and indexed in cha~term 1 to ~9~ both 96-658 Section 2: The provi~ions of such Code shall be in force on and after March il, 1997, except am otherwise provided herein, and alt ordinancsm of a general and permanent nature such Code are hereby repealed from and af~ex ~areh al, I997, exoep~ as provided below. Section 3: T~e repeal provided for the preceding section of this ordlnmnce ~hall not aff~et a~y offeese Or act co,mitred or done on any penalty or forfeiture incurred or any contract or right established or accruing before ~arch 31, 1997; ~et shall judgment rendered priol to ~aroh 31. 1997; not shall such repeal affect any ordinance or resolution promising or guaranteeingthe payment of ~on~y for the County or authorizing the issue of any bonds of the County or any evidence of the county's indebtedness or any contract ol obligation assumed by the County; not shall it affect any annual tax rate or levy; nor shall it affect any right or franchise conferred by ordinance er resolution of the County on any person or corporation; nor shall it affect ~ny ordinance adopted for purposes which ~ave been uonaumnated; non ~hall it affect any ordinance ~hich is temporary, although genera~ in effect, or special, although permanent in effect; nor shall it affect any ordinance relating to ~h~ salaries or other benefit~ or entitlements Qf the County's officers Or employees; ncr shall it ,ffect any ordinance annexing territory to the County~ nor shall it af£sut any ordinance naming, reneminq~ open,hq, accepting or vacating streets oi alleys in the County; nor shall it af£ec~ any erdlnanoe adcDtsd after November 13, 1996. Section 4. The following ordinances shall remain in included in the codified Code: Ruffin Mill Road Area ~ub~ivisien and Development Sewsr Distrin~ Ruffin Mill Road Area Spscial Tax er Assessment Wa~en Distric~ Ruffin Kill Road Area S~scial Tax or Assessment sewer District. Ruf£iu Mill Road Area Subdivision and Dsvelcpment Sewer District II. Route 1/301 Area Special Tax or Assessment sewer DiBtTict Route iQ/Landfill Drive Special Tax or Assessment Sewer District East Rexmcor Drive/Karwick Drive ~pecJal Tax ~r Assessment S~wer District Re.moor Drive S~ecial Tax or Asssssment Sewer Dimtrict Divimion ~_ Lyndale Drive Special Tax ar Assesmmmnt Water District. Development Standards Manual These ordinancs shall have the full force and effect of County ordinancss and may only be emended e~ repealed in th~ mama ~mnner as ordinances g~nerally. Section ~: The sections, paragraphm, smn~ences, clause~ and provisions of this ordinance~ the ordinances listmd iD section 4 above, and the Code hereby adopted are severable, and if any provision, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance the ordinancem lasted in section 4 above or cf the Cede hereby adopted are declared Unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by the vali~ j~d~ment or decree of a count cf competent jurls~ctien, such unconstitutionality or invalidity mhall not affect any of the remaining provisions, claumes, sentences, Daragnaphs and sections of this ordinance, the ordinancem listed in section ~ above or of the Code. section 6. The amendments to § ~-13(f) of the current Code and recodified as ~ ~-51(f) shall be effective immediately u~en adoption Qf this ordinance. Section 7. Except as provided above in Section 6, this ordinance shall be ~ffective on Karch 31, 1997. Plr. MoCraoken stated this date and time ham been advertised for a public hearing to consider the proposed ~¥98 Enhancenent Projects. Me further stated thmt staff im recommending one new project -- the Route 360 Landscaping Project. Ms. Kathy Crockett expressed concerns relative to the staff proposal ~he had ~eCently received relating tO the safety issues along salem C~urch Road that she e~oke to :he Board abo~t at a previous meeting. She indicated she d~d not feel that placing illumination lights, rather than a traffic light, on Salem Church Road or e~tending the morning hours of the crossing ~axd, would be e~fective. She stated that she feels the When asked, ~r. McCracken ~tated that th~ traffic !ight that has of meeting ~ignal warrants and iea lower priority than other priority llst for the sidewalks an Salem Church Road. He recommended the Board begin with a smaller scale project, rather time and take an additional action to request the State to that he feels the Beard shou!d communicate ~ith the school Board r~qarding thi~ i~u~. He stated that CrenEhaw ~lem~nt~ry School There was brie~ discussion relative tO the $~ million cost for ~2 Daniel stated that h~ doesn't feel that the culture of students ~alking to school will change. He further stated that the $2 million is not available for the project and that he approved the proposed FYPS Enhancement P~ojects list as ~ubmitted and directed staff %0 ~orward the list ~o r_he Rio~mon~ amd Tri-cities ~etropolitan Planning Organizations and the Virginia Dep~rtmenb of Transportation (VDOT} for approval; the Landscaping Route 10 Phase II Project ($14,00Q) and for ~he ll/lZ/96 Route 260 Landscaping Pr0je¢~ (~urner Road to Courthouse Road) ($60,000}; suthorized the County Administrator ts enter ~ntc enhancement project construction and/or design and/or right-of- way acqulsltlun agreements with the VDOTt consultants and/or contractor~, subject to approval by the County Attorney and subject to a~prsprfatien of funds in FYPS~ and adopted the following resolution r~questing V~OT apprcval and guaranteeing the local match funds for these projects: WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) construction allocation prcoedulres, it is necessary that the local ~overning body request, by resolution, approval NOW, THEREFORE, B~ IT RESOLVED that the Board of Superviso%'n of Chesterfield County requests the CTB to establish a project for Phase II of the lend,ceDing on Route 10 from the Courthouse Complex to Chester Road. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total es=imated cast of $100,000 for planning design, right-of-way, and construction of Phas~ II of the Rs'ute l0 LaDd~caping Project ~rom the Courthouse Complex to Chester Road, and that, if the Boerd subsequently elects unreasonably cancel this prcject~ the County of Chesterfield hereby agrees that th~ Virginia Department of Transporta=ion wall b~ rei~ur~ed Sot the total amount of the costs expen~ed by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. And, further, the Board adopte~ t~e fOllOWing resolution: W~EREAS, in accordance ~ith COmmoDw~alth Transportation Board (CTB] construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that the local qeverning body request, by resolution~ approval of the proposed enhana~ent projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requ~st~ the CTB to a project for the landscaping ~n Route 360 from Turne~ Road to Courthouse Road. EE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the board hereby agrees ~o pay d~siqn, right-of-way, and construction of the Route L~ndscaping ~roJeet from Turner Rued to Courthouse Road and that, if the Board mubsequently elect~ to unreasonably cancel this project, the County oS Chesterfield hereby agrees that Virginia Department of Transportation will be relmbur~d ~or the total amount of the costs ex~ended by the Department through the ~ate the Depart~ent is notified of suck canc~11atlon. And, further~ the Beard adopted the following r~solution: WHEREAS~ in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation that the local governing body request, by resolution, approval NOW, TKEREFORE, BR IT RESOLVED that ~e Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests the CTB ~o establish 2Q ~erc=nt of :he to,al e~timated cost of $70,000 for planning, design, right-of-way, and =onstruo~ion of =he $~oketree Bike Lane Project, and that, if the Board subsequently ~lects unreasonably cancel ~i= project, the County of Chesterfield h~reby agrees that the Virginia Department of Transportation will be reimbursed for the total a~ount of t~e costs expanded by 11/13/96 96-661 such cancellation. And~ further, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, in accordance w~th Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) construction allooatlsn procedure~, it ic necessary that the local governing body rec~est, by re~olution, approval of the proposed enhancement projeots. NOW, THEREFORE, gE IT RESOLVED that the Board of SUpervisors of Chesterfield County requests the CTB to establish a projectfor imprsvements to the Eppin~ton Historic Park. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby a~r~a~ to pay 20 Derce~t of ~h~ %oral ea~i~ated coat of $2~0,000 for planning, ~e~ign, right-of-way, an~ oonstruction of the Eppington Historic Park Project, and that, if the ~oard subsequently sleots to unreasonably cancel this project~ t~e County of Chesterfield hereby a~rea~ t/~at thc Virginia Department cz Transportation Will he reimbursed for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through t~e da%e the Depar~men~ is no~i£ia~ sf such cancellation. And, fu~th~r~ the Board adopted the following r~olution: that the local governing body r~qua~t, by ~$olution, approval ~OW, ~HEREFORE. BE I~ RESOLVED that the Bo~d of a project fo~ sidewalk improvements on Route 1 at various BE ~T FURTHER RESOLVED that the ~o~ h~r~y a~rees 2~ percent of the total ~s~imate~ :o~t of $115,~00 for planning, design, right-of-way, and constr~ctlon of the Route 1 $~dewalk Project - various Loca~n~ from ~ippenkam Parkway to Route 28s~ and that, if the B~ard subse~ently elects to unreasonably that the Coalition will reimburse th~ Virgini~ Department of D~partment through the date the Department is notified of ~uch =~nc~llatlon. An~ further, the Board ndopted the following remolution: WHER~S. in accordance w~th Co~cn~ealth Transportation that the local governing body re.est, by re~olution, approval NOW. TKEREFORE, BE ~T R~SOL~D tha~ ~e Board of supervisors of Chesterfield county ~equests the CT5 to establish BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby agree~ to pay d~ign, ~ight-of-way, and con~truction of the Landscaping Route 10 (I-295 Intmrchangm Ar~a) Project, an~ ~a=,' if the Board ~ub~equen%ly elects to unreasonably cancel this project, Department of Transportation will be reimbursed for ~e total amount of the costs e~ended by the Department t~rough the dat~ the D~partment is notified of such cancellation. And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution: W~EREA$, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board (OTB) construction allocation procedures, it is that the local governing body request, by resolution, of the proposed enhancement projects. ~0W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests the CTB to establish a project to pro~ide a bike trail network in the Complex area. BE IT FURT~BRR~SOLVED that the Board hereby agrees ~o pay 20 percent of the total estimated cost of $125,000 for planning, design, right-of-way, and construction of the Courthouse Complex Bik~ Trail NetworR P~ojset, and that, if the Board ~ubseqaently elect~ to unreasonably cancel this p~aject, the Csunty of Chesterfield hereby agrees that the Virginia Department of Trangpcrtation will be reimbursed for tka to%al amount ef the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. And, further, the Board adopted ~he following rasolution: WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation that the local governing body request, by resolution~ approval of ~he proposed enhancement projects. NOW, THEREFORE, B~ IT RE$©LV~D that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield county requests the CTB to establish a project to provide sidewalks end landscaping on Route 60 in the Village cf ~idlothian for Phase tt improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Beard hereby agrees 20 percent of the total estimated co~t of $~0,0eo for planning design, right-of-way, and construction of Sidewalks/landscaping - Route 60 Midlothian Phase II Project, will be pa~ by the Village of ~idl0thian Volunteer Coalition, and that, if th~ Board subsequently elects to unreasonably cancel this project, the County of Chesterfield hereby agrees that the Coalition will reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by D~partment through the data the Department is notified of such cancellation. And~ further~ the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREA$~ in accordance 9itt Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) construction alleca~ion procedures, it ia necessary that the local governing body ~equest, by r~solution, approval of the propo~od enhancement projects. NOW, T~R~FORE, BE IT ~OLV~D that the Board of Oupervisor~ of CheSterfield County requests the CTB bo establish a project for landscaping on Powhite Parkway and C~iDp~Dham Parkway Phase I BE IT FURT~ RESOLVED that the Board hereby agrees to pay ~0 percent of the total estimated cost of $1,000,000 for ~lannlng, design, right-of-way, and ConStruction of the ~owhito Parkway and Chlppenham Parkway Phase I Project, and that, if the Board subsequently elects to unreasonably cancel this project, the County of Chesterfield hereby agrees that the Virginia Department Of Transportation will be reimbursed for the total amount of the costs e~pended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. And, £urthe~, the Board adopted the following resolution: WKEREA$, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board (OTB) construction all~cation procedures, it is necessary that the local governing body request, by resolution, approval of the proposed enhancement projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE~O~V~D that the Board of Supervisors cf Chesterfield County requests the CTB to establish a project for the Appomattox Linear Park Study. BE IT FURTEE~ RE~0LV~D that the Board hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total estimated cost of $25,000 for planning, dealgn, right-of-way, and construction of the Appomattox Linear Park Study, and that, if the Board ~ub~eqUently ele=t~ to un~easonably cancel this Drejest, the County of Chesterfield hereby agrees that the virginia Department of Transportation will be reimbursed for the to,al amount of the csst~ expended Dy t~e Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. And~ further, %he Board adopted the following resolu=ion: WHEREAS, in acoordanue wi~h Commonwealth T~an~portation Board (CTB) construction allocation p~oa~dures, it is that ~he local governing body request, by resolution, approval of ~he proposed enhancement projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE~OLV~D that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requests the CTB to establish a project for the Purchame o~ Aikens Swamp and Improvements to Henricus Asoes~ Trail in Chesterfield County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby agrees to pay ~0 percent of the total estimated Ce~t Of $~1,000 for plannlng, design, right-of-way, and construction for the Purchase of Aikens Swamp and Improvements ~e Eenricus Access Trail in C~ester£1eld County, and that~ if the Board subsequently elect~ to unreasonably cancel this project, the County of chesterfield hereby agrees that the Virginia Department of Transportatioh will be reimbursed for the total a~ount of the costs eMp~nded the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. And, further, the ~eard adopted the £0110wing resolution: WHEREAS, in accordance with Commenwealth Board (CTB) eon~tructlon all~cation procedures, it is necessary that the local governing body request, by resolution, approval of the prepared enhancement projec~z. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roard of Supervisors of Chesterfield County requeet~ =he CTB tO establish a project for landzcaping on Route 360 from Rout~ ~ to Swift BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that t~e Board hereby agrees to pay 20 per=tnt of the total estimated cost o~ $70,000 for planning, design, right-oS-way, and con~:ructien of the Route 360 Landscaping Project from Route 288 to Swift Creek, and that, the ~eard subsequently elects to unreasonably cancel thi~ project, th~ County of Chesterfield hereby agrees Virginia Department of T~ansportatisn will be reimbursed for the total amount of the co~t~ expended by th~ b~partm~nt through the date the Department i~ no~ifi~d of such cancellation. Vo~e: Unanimous 96-664 11/13/96 Mr. Daniel made a motion, seconded by Mr. MoHale, for the Board relating to the sidewalks on Salem Church R~ad in the future through some other mechanimm of possible funding. Mr. Barber offered an amendment to the motion to imclude correspondence with the School ~oard outlining the problem and requesting input into a variety of proposed sclutlon~ to the Mr. Daniel requested tha~ t~a original motion he voted and sta~ed that he would support a ~parats motion dealing with the school Saard. recommendation. Mr- Daniel called for the vo~s on the motion made by him, seconded by ~r. McHala~ fo~ the Boar~ to direct staff to p~tition the State to address the concerns relating =o ~he sidewalks on salem Chu~o~ Road in the School area amd to ¢on~ider the Salem Church Sidewalk Projec~ in the future through some other mechanism of possible funding. Vote: Unanimous directed the County Administrator to communicate with the School Board regarding the problems at Salem Etumentary and Middle Schools and to r~quest input into ~o!utions to the issue. Vote: requested Conditional Usa to permit child day ears use, private school ~se and multi-family housing in conjunction wi~h a permitted church. The denmity of ~uch amendment ~ill be Comprehensive Plan suggests the property i~ appropriate for offic~ use. This request lies iu an Agricultural (A) Oi~rlct th= southeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax the Planning Co~is~ion and staff recommend approval subject to conditions and acceptance to proffered conditions. He noted that the ~equest is consistent with the Plannin~ Cu~isslon's MS. Vickie Babel, representing the a~plicant, ~tatsd the aDpr0ved Case ~6SN0167, subject to th~ following conditions: 1. Except where the requirements of the underlying Agricultural (A) zoning are more restrictive, any dwelllnq units shall conform to the requirements of the Zoning ordinance for Multi-family Residential (R-}IF) Di~triats, Section al.l-107. (p) 11/13/96 2. Except where the requ~ement~ cf the und~rlyinq Agricultural (A) z~ning are more restrictive, any child day ca~e use shell conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for Corporate office (0-2) Districts in Emerging Growth Areas. (p) And, further, the Board accepted the following proffered conditions: 1. Except where the requirements of the underlying Agricultural (A) zoning are more restrictive, any new development for school use shall conform to the requirements of the Zoninq ordinance for Corporate office (0-2) Districts in Emerging Growth Areas. 2. A. At suuh time a~ the publlo water system has been extended to the property, ell child day care, private school or multi-family housing uses shall be connected to the public water system. B. Site plans shall depict an easement intended to accommodate extension of ~ublic water to area properties in the future. The exact location shall be approved by the Utilities Department at shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, te and for Chesterfield County prior to ~ha release of any occupancy permits fee any child duy care, private school or multi-family housing uses. 3. With any future building construction beyond Phase 1 (defined as a 1200 seat sanctuary, office space, education buildin~ and day care con%er) the property owner shall extend the public wastawater ~ystem to th~ ~ite and csnnect all existing an~ fu:ure facilities to the public system. 4. Prior to any site plan approval, forty-fiv® (45) fe~t of right-of-way on the north side of Courthouse Road~ measured from t~e eenterlin= of that part of Courthouse Road immediately adjacent to the Prcperty~ shall be dedioated~ f~ee and unrestrictmd, to and for the benefit of chesterfield county. Direc~ access to Courthouse Roa~ shall ~e limited to two (2) eatrance/¢xits. The exact location of theme accesses shall be approved by the Transportation Department. 6. Ts provide an adequate roadway system at time of complete development, the Developer ~hall b~ raspo~$ibl~ fsr the ~llowinq: A. Construntion of additional pavement along Courth~un~ R~ad at each approved access to provide left and right turn lanes based on Tr~nsp0rtation Department standards; Relocation of the ditch to ~rovide an ad~quat~ ~houtder along the north side of Courthouse Road f~r the entire Property' frontage;' and C. D~dication to Chesterfield county, free and unrestricted~ amy additional ~ight-of-way (or ~a~m~nts) required for the improvements identified above. 7. Prior to any site plan approval, a phasing plan for the Condition 6, ~hall be submitted to and approved by the Transportation Department. 11/13/96 Ail sound sensitive land use~ as determined by the Transportation Department shall hays a 200 foot wide setback, e×clusiv~ of r~quired yards, from the Route 288 right-of-way. ~a=ural vegetation shall be retainsd within thi~ setback area, unless removal of the vegetation is approved by th~ Planning commission. 9. A maximum of 150 residential dwelling units shall be permitted. 10. With respect to the residential dwelling units, %he applicant, subdivider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the County of Ch~t~rfiel~ prier to the time o~ ~uilding permit application for infrastructure imprcvement~ within the service district for the property: a. 59% of $5,175 per unit, if paid on or prier to June 30, 1~6; or b. The amount approved by the Soard of supervisors net to axeeod 59% of $5,175 per lot adjusted upward by any incrsase in the ~arshall an~ swi%t Buildin~ Co~t Index between July 1, 1996 and Ju~y 1 of the fiscal year in which the payment i~ made if paid after June ~, 1996. 1t. Residents of the residential dwelling units shall meet the occupancy requlremen=s for "age 55 or over" houolng as set forth in 3607 of the Fair Ecusing Act, 4~ $401 e~. seq., as amende~ by ~he Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1~88 and 500.3D~ of subtitle B-Regulations Relating ts 5ouslng and Urban Dsvelopment, Part Subpart E--Housing for Older Person~ 2~ CFR C~. 100.~00 et. seq., 4-1-90 Edition, in effect as of the date of the ~ezonin~. The foregoing notwithstanding, no person under the age of 19 shall be entitled to reside at the Propsrty. (STAFF NOTE: TEE CHILD CARE, PRIVATE SCHOOL A~D MULTI-FAmILY ~0U$ING USES ARE ONLY PERMITTED IN CO~JUNCTION WITH CHURCH USE ON TEE PROPERTY.) Vote: Unanimoum 1996 LEGISLATIVE WORKSESSION Mr. Micas stated that th~ Beard ha~ scheduled at its next Board meeting, itm annual ~eeting wi~ht~a G~neral Asmem~ly Dslsgatio~ to discuss any itsmm that will be forwarded to the General Assembly. H~ presented an overview uf the 1997 Legislative ~rogram including Administration of Government issues and Finance and Taxation £s~ue~. Thers was brief di~cusslon relative to the total nu~be~ and dollar amount the current Teal estate ~xe~ptio~s as it relates to the FinaDCe an~ Taxation issues rsla~ing to the Authority allowing real property tax exenptiens for three properti~ owned by Che~terfiel~ Alternatives, Incorporated; Authority allowing real estate tax exemptions for three properties owned by Th~ Foundation for Senior Independence; and Authority allowing real estate tax ex~ption for the Renrieum Foundation. Me, ~arber m=ated that he has requested staff to review a · similar i~mue regarding tax exemption for some recreational property and net others. He furT~her mtated that if staff finds that the conditions are favorable, he would probably bring an item £orwar~ at the next Board meeting. 96-667 Mr. Micas continued tc review Finance and Taxation issues. There was brief discussion relative tu Finance sn~ Taxation issue Nunber i0,, A~ending Section 58.1-~i~ of the code of ~rqln~a to allow local ordinances ~o permit a one year increase in ~noome of up to $50,000 resulting from the death of a spouse without eliminating a real estate exemption if ~he ~urvivinq ~pou~e continues to quality the followinq yea= or if all insurance company proceeds are expended in funeral/estate costs. ~r. Barber stated that the County did, at one time, grant tax relief for people who r~ach~d a certain age, regardless of income, however, the General Asse~ly took that privilege away from the County several years ago. He further stated tha~ he doe~ not know whether there is an opportunity to ~ectify this ~i=uatlon, however, the Board can talk about this ~s~ue to the General A~me~bly Delegation at its ne~t Board ~eeting. Mr. ~ioa~ continued to review Finance and Administration Mr. Daniel stated that the Board should communicate to its General Assembly Delegation about the impaots ~heir ac=ions will ~ave on local governments a~ it ~elate~ to providing ~at the V~rg~nia ~partment of Transportation shall transS~r authority right-of-way for which a licenze agreement or Board ~umarizin~ i~u~ %hat will affect the 1997 C~nural Assembly. th~ t~l~communication towers would be bsneflulal to county citizens also and could be distributed at co~tit~n~ m~tlngs. There was brief discussion relative to Co--unity Dev~lo~men= Y3~_~knla. to exempt public =afety facilities fro~ %he re~iremen= ~e~criDtion. Nr. Mioas continued to review Community Development, Public N~ber 16., Anending Section 37.1-195 of the Cod% of ellminate the obligation to appoint th~ Sheriff %o Co,unity D~l~g~tion. Nr. ~icas then reviewed the following sup~urt/oppos~ legislation Support amen~ents to the Appropriation Act tu help fund ~he expansion of the Richmond centre. 2. support legislation which would simplify the process for 96-668 Support legislation which will allow citizens a~eisting public ~af~ty ~ploye~s to require ~esting of suspects when the assisting oitigen is exposed to blood-born fiscal obligations to local governments under Comprehensive Services Act if sufficient funds are not appropriated. 5. Support legislation which reclassifies stalking with a protective order against a person charged with stalking before a trail is held. 6. Support protection of currant CaSh proffer law. 7. SUpport protection of current approach to sovereign immunity. Vircinia, to provide that real estat~ taxes remain due on assessment appeal. virclnia, to remove the rnquirem~nt to s~nd real estate that is less than $5.00. package in detail for consistency with ~be ~oard~s Legislative Program and add any appropriate VAS0 absol~t91y aware of th~ number of efforts directed a local revenue and clarified that the County im confine~ by the to certain streams of revenue including personal property tax, real estate ray, BPOL tax, and cash prof£ers. He further stated that he feels, as the hume~uilders go forward with attacking cash proffers, they ar~ going against th~ County's position ~hat new growt~ must pay ~or itself. Ha stated that he feel~ it important that thim message should b~ commuhicate~ to citizens Mr. Daniel requested the County Administrator ~e inform that the only issue relating to cash proffer~ is how much been pledged to the County in cash proffers ~nd net the question proffer ~igures to constituent~ and the impact it will have on services in chesterfield County. roads~ schools, parks, libraries, ~ts. and that to take the underlying support that cash proffers will brin~ when the development comes, places a lot of the~e projects at risk. (It is noted a copy of the propo~d 1997 Legislative Program is file~ wit~ the papers of this Board.) 96-669 O~ ~otion of Mrs. Humphrey, seconded by Hr. ~c~ale, the Board authorized the County Administrator to ~ecut~ a real estate Magisterial District. Vote: Unani~ou~ i~. ADJOURNMENT On motion of Mr. Ne~ale, seconded by ~r. Barber, the Boar~ adjourned ~t 8:30 p.m. until Kove~ber ~, 1996 ~ 6:00 ~.m. for the 4th Annual State of the Metro Area Dinner at the Richmond Marriott. Vote: Unanimous 96-570