02-23-24-96 Minutes/'
~ZNUTES
Fabruar~ ~3-24~ ~99S
Supe~eo~s ~n &ttendance:
Mr. Harry ~. Daniel, Chairman
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Vice Chr~.
~r. Edward B. Barber
Mrs. Renny B. ~umphrey
Mr. J. L. McHale, III
Mr. Lane B. Ramsay
County Admlni~trator
County Staff in Attendances
Ms. Marilyn cole, EXeO.
Asst. to County Admin.
F~r. Michael S. Golden,
Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Mr. Thom~s E. Jacobean,
Dir., Planning
Deputy Co. Admln.,
Hr. ~enDeth Perrotte, Oir.,
Public Affeir~
~. James J. L. ste~maier,
Mr. M. D. Stith,
~e~uty co. Admfn.,
Community Development
~chool Board N~mhers in Attendance: School Staff in ~ttendanee:
M~. Dianue E. Pettitt, Chrm.
Mr. James R. Schroeder, Vice ChI~.
Mrs. Elizabeth B. Davis
Mr. Thomas L. Wootton, Jr.
School Board Members A~sent:
Mr. Marshall W. T~emmell, Jr.
Mr. Thoma~ R. F~Iqhum
Superlntendent~ Finance
Dr. Carl Chafin, A~t.
Superintendent for
Institutional Service~
Servicee
Dr. Harold D. Gibson,
Assistant superintendent
Mr. Larry Johns, Asst.
School Superintendent
~s, D~bre ~arlcw, Dir.,
Community Relations
~. Lisa Di~unno, Dir.,
Planning and Re~arch
Mr. Daniel called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. on February
23, ~996 at Oscars Res=aurant.
At the Soard of SuDarvlsor~/Sohool Board R~trea~ the following
decisions were ~ade a~d staff were directed to follow-up on
certain items as noted:
SESSION WITH T~E COFffdITTEE ON T~E FUTURE
1- Mr. Warren ~ugge~t~d that the Committee on the Future
develop a video that projects a vision for Chesterfield
County.
96-121
The Board of Supervisors and School Board requested
to identify ways to address school maintenance,
considering outsourcing as an option, and wo~k a
recommendation through the Board of Supervisors/School
Board Liaison Committee.
3. Based on the Future's Committee report, the School Board
was requested to address the issue of school starting and
ending
The Beard of Supervisors amd School Board requested
ts address the issue 0£ tax incentives for rehabilitation
er repair of existing residential structures over 25 years
old and to bring a rscsi~mendat~sn bask through t/~e Budget
and Audit Committee to the Board as part of the FYg?
TOTAL_Q_U~LITYMANAGEMENT AND KEY MEASURES (Presentation by Ms.
Sharon Randol and Ms. Lisa DiNunno)
1. Following the presentatien~ and an affinity
brainstor~koy measures, staff was directed to categorize
the results of the exercise and pre~nt a ~ary to the
two Bsar~.
2. The School Board will take under advisement the ume of TQM
and the key mea~ure~ identified regarding a balanced
sesreeard~ see how these fit in w~th what schools are
doing, sad fill in gaps to determine future goals and how
to move towards measured performance.
D~O~RAP~ICS/A~EA PLANS (Presentation by Mr. ThomaE Jacobsen,
Mr. Glenn Lateen, and Me. L~sa DiNunno)
1. Planning staff was requested to find data from sommunltiss
with demographics similar to what the County expect~ to
have in the year 2010 to give sums indioatlon cf what to
2. Planning staff was also requested to provide copies of the
County's Public Facilities Plan to School Board members.
3. County and School staff was requested to submit an updated
list of school enrollment projections =o =~e Board cf
Supervisors.
It wes genially a~eed to recess at 9:~§ p.m. until February
Reconvening:
The meeting was called ts order at S:40 a.m. on Saturday,
Februarl; 26, 1996.
~C~OOL BOND PROJECTS (Presentation by D~. Carl Chafi~)'
1. ~r, Daniel requested School staff to submit, to the Soard
of ~up~rvisors, a li~t of expenditures ~l%at are Sun,ed by
bond referendum~ and tho~e f~ded by ~e capital Rese~e,
bond funded.
2. ~. Daniel re~e~ted follow t~ough widths co~unity to
ascertain the ne~4s for the Meadowbrook project an~ to
have an arohiteot analyze and produce a plan showing if
and how the needs could be met on the current site. He
also requested a proposal be developed, to .ac~ire
additional sites at 9res~nt location.
2/23-24/96
/ \
Mr. Daniel requested County and School staff to develop a
proposal for acquiring additional sites at ~he present
Meadowbrook High School loca=ion.
4. The two Boards generally agreed that no further action wa~
needed at this time on the projects lis~ed as unfunded on
the School Bonrd's list of CIP projects.
5. The Board of Supervisors requested a list by School of all
improvements ~or each school including construction,
renovations, technology, maintenance, etc.
6. School staff wa~ requested to developed an analyzlz
showing whioh project~ will be funded with the money
available each year am well as projected completion dates
for CIP projects.
7. The two Boards generally agreed to have the School Liaison
Committee review issues identified at the Retreat and then
have another joint meeting prior to mid-April to reach
LFn~ B. Ramsay 6f
county Administrator
chairmaa ~
~6-125 2/~-24/96