02-28-96 MinutesBO~I~D OF ~UPER?ISORS
MINUTE~
Pebruar~ 28, 1996
~H9erv[pe~ ~ ~ttendance:
Mr. Harry S. Daniel, Chairman
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Vice
Mr. Edward B. Barber
Mrs. Renny B. Humphrey
Mr. J. L. MeHale, III
Mr. Lane B.
County Adminlstra=or
Staff in Attendance:
Mr. Craig Bryant, Dis.,
U%ili~ie~
Nit. N. E. Can~icha~l,
Commissioner of Revenue
M~. Mari]yn Cole,
Assr, to county Admin.
Ms. Faith L. Davis,
Clerk to the Board
~r. William D. DuD1er,
Building official
Chief Robert L. Eanes, Jr.,
Fir~
Mr. Michael Gold,n,
Parks and Recreation
Deputy CO. Adnin.,
Dir., Planning
Ms. Mary Leu Lyl~,
Dir.,
Dir-, ~nv. ~ngineering
County Attorney
Dir., Health
~ublic Affairs
G~neral Services
Police DeDartment
Di~,, ~udg~k &
~. ~. D. Stith,
D~=~y Co. Admin.,
Community Development
Dir.,
~r. Frederiok Willi~ Jr.,
Dir., Human Resouroe
Daniel called g~e regularly scheduled meetin~ to order at
3:00
96-124
1. APPROVAL O~ MINUTE~
1.~. F~BRU~Y 14, 1996
On motion of Mr. ~oHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, ~he Board
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of ~r. Mc~sle, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved the minutes of Feb~ary ~?, 1996, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
2. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S
Mr. Ramsay introduced Captain Dennis Turli~gton to brie~ the
:Board on the Countyts very successful Blood Drive Program.
Captain Turllngtom stated Chss~erfield County employees have
donated ~,066 units of blood singe De~e~ber~ 1975. ~e further
stated because of the dedication of County employee~ to this
Program, a total Of 7~4 units were collected in 1995, and 14~
units has ~een donated this year by employee~. ~e ~tated he
atteDded an awards ceremony on February 14, 1996, pra~entedby
the Virginia Blood servioe, and ascap=ed an Award of Excellence
on behalf of the County's Blood Donor p~6g~am and presented the
Award to M~. Ramsay. He referenced an artlcls in the newspaper
on Pebruary ll, 1~9~ recognizing Chesterfield County for its
excellent participation in the Program. He expressed
appreciation for ~he Cc~nty'~ ~upport of the Proqram and stated
ha looks forward to anethsr sucoess£ul year in 1996.
M~. R~msey expressed appr~oianion =o Captain Turlin~on and hi~
=sam 9or their efforts towards the Pro. am and s~ated they
the real u~cce~s fo~ the co~=y~s Pr0gra~.
~. ~aniel e~ress=d appreciation to Captain T~rlington for his
efforts in the ~lood D0~or Program.
=~olarships and ~v%n award~ to county High School students,
a= well as two Co~ty winners of the Leadership for ~e 21st
Century Scholarship. sh~ further stated the pr~ram was
established in 1995 and is ~pon~ored by~e Btao~ Hi~=ory Month
encourage and support the acad~m~o aspirations of County youth,
and tu recugniz~ the lea~ershi~ ~otpntial of youth for the ~lst
Century. She briefly ~eview~d~e criteria being use~ for~e
Scholarship an~ stated ~ach of the two r~c~p~ent~ will receive
u $1,000 scholar~hiD to be u~ed at any virginia public
ur university.
~ublic Schools Instructional S~eoiali~t fo~ Roc~al Studies;
Charles L~, EEO EmDlo~ent Analyst for~e Cowry; Ms. Alenia
Wilder, Director of Secondary E~catio~ f0~ t~e School; a~ HS.
Jane Baske~ill~, Instru=tional ~pecialist for Foreign
Language~ and ~ngli~h as a Second Lan~age, me~e~s of the
SGholar~hip ~eloction, an~ recognized H~. ~tty ~ornet,
Committee, who was unable to attend the meeting. She then
recognized finalists who met the criteria for receiving the
Scholarship to include Miss Lanre Omajcken, Lloyd C. Bird High
School; Miss sarah Morgan, Clover Hill High School; Ms. Laura
Drewett, James River ~igh School; Miss Jessloa Pettish, Hatoaca
High school; Miss Michelle JeffErson, Me~dcwbrcok ~igh School;
Miss Emily Browning, Midlothian High school; and Miss Heather
Chapman, T91om~s Dale ~igh ~chool. ~aoh of the students was
presented wi~h a certificate. She then recognized parents,
PrinciDal~, and other school officials, who were present at =he
Evaryonn applauded the efforts of all the finalists.
Ms. Baskerville recognized Hiss Laura Drawart as the recipient
cf a $1,000 Scholarship and read the essay she wrote on
~romoting diversity in the 21st Csntury which was s par~ of the
sriteria to be oonsidere~ for the Scholarship.
~s. Chase recognized ~iss Lanre Omajoken as the recipieat of a
$1,000 Scholarship and read the essay she wrote' ebent how to
promote diversity in th~ ~lst Century which was a p~rt of the
criteria to be considered for the 9oholarship.
Mr. stith ~tated the increased number of donors and increased
amount of donation= to Blao~ History Month Celebrations are
directed ~elated to adding the Scholarship fund. Ee then
pre,anted the ~cholarshipe to Lar~ an~ ~anra.
Mis~ 0majoken stated writing her essay about stopping
prejudices ca~e fro~ inside herself and that after high school
she plans ~o atten~ a college in Virginia and then on to
~sdical school to become a Doctor.
Miss Drawart stated that she feels stopping prejudices begins
within the home and that she plans to attend a four year
co,legs after graduation.
4. REOUESTS TO ~OST~O~ A~TION, ADDITION~. OR
on ~otion Of M2C. Be~hur, seconded by ~r. Mc~ale, the Board
replaced Item ~.B.2., Appointments %u the Drug and Alcohol
Ab~se Tusk Force; udded Item 8.B.3., Appoiutment to the
Cor~mittee on the ~uturu to follow ittm S.B.2.; added Item
B.C.t2., Authorization For Advertisement of ~ee Increase in
Environmental Engineering for FY97 Budget Process to follow
It~ 8.C.11., Approval of FY19~6 Zid-Year School ~oard Budget
Revisions; and deleted Item 10.~ Exa~utlve Se~io~ ~rs~a~t to
~e~tion ~.~-~A.7. Code of Vfrq%n~a,. 1950, a~ ~ende~, for
Consultation with L~gal Counsel Rel~tin~ to ~os v. ~al~ and,
Vote: Unanimous
RESOLUTIONS AND S~ECIAL RE~NITIONB
time.
were no Remol~tions and Special Recognitions at this
2/28/96
Mr. Stith pre.anted a brief overview of the County's ~nteI~rise
Zonn Report and stated ~e County currently'ha~ two ~nt~ri~=
Zone~. Ke reviewed total nu~er of certified b~slnesses in the
Zone; total bu~inessss investin~ in the Zone; dollar valu~ of
i~vestmmnt; total number of pe~it~ and dollar value of thos~
p~its from 1992-199~; total nu~er of utilities applications;
an~ new busine~ ~tart-up~. He noted a~p~oxima~ely $1.4
millien of Co.unity Development ~look Grant funding has been
solid, deflnitlv~ plan to put sewer along ~e Corridor. He
further stated he would llke staff ~o ~rement to the Board,
soma=im~ this year, a r~asonable plan on how to provide sew~
along the Jefferson Davis Corridor.
~. Mc~ale stated bu~inc~ueu alonq the Jefferson Davi= Corri~or
frequently ~press th~ ooncern %ha~ tbs lack of County ~aw%r
make it difficult fo~ businesses to market property along the
Corridor for investments. ~e f~ther s~ate~ tbs County has a
~ub~tantial inves~ent in~e CorridoT a~d~at he oo~o~Is w~th
~e co~ent~ ~xpr~ms~d by ~r. Daniel. He %hen introduced Mr.
Mr. Jacobsen presented a brief ove~iew of t~e County's
Riverfront Plan ~roj=ct including a view of ~e County's
riverfront land; planning tasks; d~awings and mapping~ of
different design concepts along the riverfront. He stated
=o~¢~rrent wlth~e development of u long-range plans staff i~
al~o addressing specific, short-term projects ~at may b~
implemented ~arli~r and briefly reviewed the p~lic
participation proces~ into the Riverfron= Plan Projeot. He
note~ a p~llc workshop i~ SCheduled for March i~, 1996 at
Thomas Dale ~igh School to review the~aft c~preh~ns~ve ~lun
Mr. Daniel co~=n~=d staff for their effor~ in~o thi~ Project.
Richmond Community CorDs. ~e stated the Cor~s was formed in
1994, with its primary mission to reduoe crime and prevent the
f~rther spread ef criminal activity among childr~ and youth hy
from within selected communities, communities of faith, and the
official of th~ local jurisdictions and staff, as well as
industry; that fundin~ is provided by donations fro~ local
jurisdictions and the private sector; and that Hanover, at this
time, does not participate financially. He briefly reviewed
area-wide 9rsJec=s p~r£ermsd by the Corps ~uring its first year
year ie to ~evelop linkages with existing organizations in the
· ervices, that the Co.unity Corps in its original mission
Mr.'Daniel requested staff to submit to %he Boa=d the messurss,
as it refteots the activity and mission of the Co*~munlty Corp~,
sQmetime in the future as the Corps redeflns itt miemion.
~r. Ramsey reviewed the regional ictus relating to John .Tyle~
Co~munit~ollege Project and briefly reviewed the history, of
the Prcjmet. ~e ~tated the land dona=ion from Reynolds T~ust
to John Tyler.for the purpo$~ of buildin~ a northern area
campus included the cond~tion~ of road construction beginning
by ~ly 1, 1996 an~ Sta~e appropriating its sk ar~ u~ fun~ing
for construction by April 1, 1998. He furth~ ~tated that if
~itber of th~ two oon4itions are not mat, i5 couI~.r~sult
includes $8 million in local match in FY97 and $9.3 million
~9.3 falls approximately $9 million mho~t of building the first
phase of the Project as defined by John Tyler, however,
is another year to secure State funding before reversion of the
prop~y. He noted the C0~uni~y College Soard detrained the
Jbh~ TyI~r c~pus is their n~ber one priority in the State.
pasmed a hill to allow the city ~f Richmond to ~OVe entirely
in=o the J. Sar~mant Reynolds Community Colleqe Dist~i~t. He
noted the ~ouse of Delegates will consider th~ Mill in a few
daym.
There wam ~riaf ~i~O~ssion r~Ia~ive to the impadt on funding if
~e ~n r~vtew~d th~ r~gional issue relatin~ ~o %he
Richmond AreuRe~ionalism Study and identified ~ me~e~ of
the Study ~Co~i~tee. H~ stated ~he manag~rs/a~inlstrators on
t~e Co~ittee promoted the idea that a cost-benefit anmly~i~ be
regionalization . H~ further ~tated the Co~ittee chose four
~jor issues to address including public transDor~ation~ water
and'wa~tewater~e~vioe, education, and ~ocial services,
health, mental retarda=ion,.s~b$=anc~ abuse~ and housing.
crazed the Con, itt== issued an RFP under the State Proc~ement
Proce~ and chose =~e Ei~ of David ~. Griffith & Associates
conduct thc analysis~ and ~at ~e cost of ~e ~tudy
submitted u legislative bill to hav~ the ~tate appropr~at~
in '~e House Appropristions Cc~ittee.
Mr..Barber excused himself from the meeting.
When asked, Mr. Ramsey =tat~d the Co~tt~$ ~alls for the work
thmt if there wam any legible%ion that %he Co~ittee
i~ would be available for the 1997 Session.
~. Daniel stated he hopes that the Board, t~ough the County
Administrator, carries a unified position un a11~e issues and
~at ~e feels each of the issum~ ad~es~ed a~e Very c~itical.
Mr. ~arb~ r~t~rned to the meeting.
Mr. MiCas r~viewed ~e regional issue ~elating to Urban
Partnership and $tate~ the Partnership is a
association of. local governments and businesses .that was
Partnership is to promote consolidation of gover~ental
se~ica~ ~ w~ll u~ r~ucin~ th~ ~conomic disparity between
localities. He stated the Partnership has sponsored a number
of b~ll~ ~n the aeneral Assembly, mo~t importantly,
Regional Competitiveness Act which sets up a monetary incentive
~%~qd to be administered by the Department of Housioq and
Community D~v=lopment. He further stated to be ellgihle for
ti~e fund, regional partnerships would have to created within
regional planning districts. He further stated if the
government is a member of a partnership, it must create an
eoono~io development plan that analyzes the regions
competitiveness with other competitive regions in the
southe&etern United States and prepare an annual report card
showing.how the.~egion is doing in increasing income, creating
jobs, and reducing economic disparity. He stated current hills
have d~fferences in funding -- one Bill has $3 million an~ the
other Bill has $10 million and that expectation~ are that
approximately $5 million ~ill be the fund to be distributed.
He ~%Lrther sta~ed Qnqe ~liglhle for a portion of the
under the current bill, the partnership, by consensus, would
agree how the ~und~ wilt be
Discussion, comments and questions ensued r~lative to whether
there has'been any assessment of the amount the metropolitan
area may receive and whether the e££~rts are worth the a~ount
of f%Lnds ~aceived.
!~r. Ramsay stated the Urban Partnership has stated that it
would take $50 mil%ion to have any impa~t on regional
init~atlves and that he does not feel the $3 or ~lO million
will ~o ver%f f~r S~a~ewide.
There was brief discussion relative to the intuitiv~ proj~ct~
"cen~eneus" as it relates ~o this i~ue; and a number of
par%n~r~ip~ being allowed within the Richmond Plannin~
DistrAct co--lesion.
Mr. MoHele stated he feels the hard W0r~ of those who have
supported regioDali~m ~hould be factored into this issue; that
central virginia has put forth a lot of cSf0rts toward
regionalism an~ ~h0~ld g~t credit for tho~e cooperutiVo
efforts; ~nd- that the General Assembly should give sair
consideratSbn to communities for lead~ng the way.
Mr. Daniel requested that the ~g~nda be ~mended to move Item
8.B.~-, A~pointments to the D~ug and Alcohol Abuse Task Force,
sod 8.B.3.;.~ADDointments to the committee On the Future, to
follow %his item.
8.B.~. DR~_..AND ;~OHOL A2USE TASK
On motion of Mr. MoHale, seconded by ~z. Barber, the
~uspeaded it~ ~les at thi~ time to allow simultnneous
nomination/appointment of memmbers to serve on the Drug and
Alcohol Abuse Task Force.
VOte; 'Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Burber, seconded by ~irs. Humphrey, the Board
simul=aneously ~ominated/appointed bt. Sandra Welch,
representing ~idlothiun District; M~. ~anoy Martex,
representing Clover Hill Dis~rictf and ~- Robert Owens,
representing Bermuda District, to serve on the Drug and A1Gohel
A~usm Task Force, whoso terms are at the p!~a~ure Of the ~oard.
Vote: Unanimous
B.B.$. QO~HITTEE ON THB PUT~RB '
On motion o£ Nr. Barber;. aecon~e~ by Mr, McHale,' ~he BOaFd
~u~penda~' it~ rules at this time to allow .simultaneoUs
nomination/appointment o~ a membeT to eer%'e on the Committee on
the Future.
On motio~ of ~r. Barber, s~e¢on~ed bY Mr. HcHale, th= ~oar~
~i~ultaneously neminated/aDpointe~ Mr. Daniel A. ~ck~r,
representing Midlothian Dimt~ict, to serve on ~he Committee on
the Futura, whose term is affectiv~ i~adiately aK~will be at
~e pleasure of the Board.
?. DE~ER~ED ITEMS
On .motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Bear~
deferred cnm~id~ratien of a memb~r~ representing Dale Diet~iot~
to serve on the Community g~rvices Board until ~aroh
7.A,2. DISABILITIES BERVICEB BOARD
On motion of Mr. McHale, ~econded by Mr. Barber, the Board
nomination/appointment of m~be~s to serve on the Disability
Services Board.
Vote: Unanimous
on mo~io~ of ~r~. Humphre~ eecon~ed by Mr. McHale, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed ~s. Darleen Morgan,
representing Dale Diatriot~ and Mr. Wya=t ~oorefield, citizen
at-larg~, to aerv~ on the Disability Services Board, who~e
terms are effective immediately and will expire December' 31,
And, further, the Board deferred oomsideration of a member,
representing Hidlothian Dietrict~ to serve on tt~e Disabilitie~
Servioss Beard until Hatch 13, 1996.
Vote: Unanimeus
7.A.3. geLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
On motion of Mr. ~cHnle, seconded b~ Mr. Barber, 'the Board
deferred sonsideration of members to serve on =~e Solid Waste
Advisory Co~u~ittee u~til March 53, 1996.
7.A.4. KRR~ CHESTERFIELD ~LE~N ~OR~O~TION
On motion of Mr. Mc~ale~ seconded bY Mr. Barber, the ~oar4
Chesterfield Clean Corporation until March ~3, 1996.
2/28/96
7.B- ~DOPTTOH OF RE$OT,UTTON SUPPO~T~N~..~HE EX~NSION,Q~
~ICHHON'D 'C~TRB ~ EFFORTS TO OBTAIN STATE FINAN~X~L
Mr. ~ammer. s~atsd the Board of Supervi~or~
consld~ration of adopting a re~olution ~upporting the expansion
of the Richmond CenLre at its January 3, 1996 meeting.
introduced Mr. ~ack Berry, President of the M~tropolitan
Richmond Convention and VisiUors Bursau (l~RCVB)~who stated the
r6selution has been approved by Hanover and Henrico
and the city 0f/%ic21mond. He f~her stated that the intention
uf the ~B is to have the ~wpansion finuncad by ~e possibl~
Hotel/MoteL Occupancy Tax as well as %he =a~es generate~ bythe
State f~Om %h~ $~1 ~illion of economic impuct~ ~po~
~o~ity per ' yea~. He stated the project wall cost
ap~roxi~tely~ $100 mitlion; that ~enate Bill ~6, requesting
that the Occupancy Taxe~ of Chesterfield, H~co, and ~anover
coun~ie~ b~ ,raised from two percent to six percent, was
approved by ~e House Finance Co~ittee and will be
further stated
~. Danielemphasized thut the ~esolution %hat will ~
by the Bo~r~ o~ Supervisors only ~upports tbs ~ffort to obtain
.~tate financial ~upport through the General Assembly and
nothln~ beyond that.
Mr. WaTren .co--ended ~. B~rry ~or his effort in getting the
~solutlon adopted bY th~ four localities.
Mr. Barber co--ended all the organizations for their ~upport of
the project and for Mrl Berr~'~ ~f~o~=~ towards ~is end,aver.
On motion of Mr. M~ale~ ~eoon~e~ by Mrs. Humphrey, th~
adopted the following resolntion:
~$, the travel and tourism industry is vital to the
economy of Chesterfield County; and
space and over ~,000 s~are feet of meeting ~pac~; and
W~S, the e~anded Ri~mond Centre would be the
largemt, first class convention an~ =xhibition hall in the
Co~o~wealth of Uirglnia; and
cities in the solicitation of =onvuntions, meeting~,
~S,'the four j~isdiotion~ of Chesterfield,
~nri=o Countie~ ~n~ th~ City of Richmond an~ ~e Co~onwealth
of Vlrgini~, will be ~e beneflcia~ie~ of ~e economic impact~
anticipated to b~ over $71 milllon of dir~ot ~pending
a~ociat~d wi~ this ~jor convention
NOW, T~E~FOR~ ~E IT RESOLED, t~at the
Co~y Boar~ of Supervisors ~ereby suppor~s the e~pan~ion of
the Richmond C~ntre as un ==oncmic development project
w~l~ ful~il~ the ~ruwlng de~nds of ~e m~eting and =onv~tion
~D, BE IT F~ RESOLVED, tBat ~e Board suppo~s
A~e~bly.
Vote:
~r, Berry commended Ms. Doris Desert, Deputy County
Adminietrator for Legislative Services, and M~. ~aryanne
Curtin, Assistant Legislativs Coordinator, for there efforts
toward regionalism.
~{r. Daniel mtated Ms. DeHart and Ms. Curtin are representing
Chesterfield at the General A~embly and are the unofficial/
official staff members to the Richmo~ Coalition of
Legislatures.
8,~, ST~TL~ INST~LLATION COST ~PPROVALS
On motion of Mr. Barber, s~oon~ed by Mr. ~=~ale, the Board
approved a streetlight installation co~t approval for the
intersection of ~ulliam street and Trevillian Read, in the
Midlothiam Maqisterial District. (Tt is note~ there is no cost
to' install the light.)
Vote: .unanimous
om motion of Mr. McHale, seconde~ by Fir. Barber, the ~esr~
no~natiou/appointment of a members to serve on the South
simultaneously nominatad/a~slnted Mr. Lane B. Ramsay,
representing chesterfield County, and ~r. Craig ~. Bryant,
· .~. CONSENT ITEKS
8.O.l.a. ~PPRO~ING THE ~DD~TION OF A PORTION OF RELOCATED
. ~UA~L~ROAD TO THE gECOND~R¥ ~¥gTEMO~ ~TAT~ NI~Y~
On motion of Mr. McHale, ne~o~e~ by Hr. Barber~ the Board
adop=~ =~e foll~wing resolution:
~E~, ~e Vi~glnia Department
mad~ uh~nges in the ~econdm~ system of state highways in
oo~otio~ wi~ P~o~ect O653-020-~53,C501, and, as a ~esult,
is rmquestin~ ~e Board of Supervisors to aDDrove the addition
of a portion of a relocated ~oad approved by th= Co~onwealth
Transportation Co~issioner.
.~OW, TH~EFORE BE IT RESOLVED, th~
doe~ hereby approv= the addition of a portion of relocated
Qualla Roa~ (Route 653} to the s~con~ury syste~ of state
highways, identified on the attached sketch, pursuant to
Huction 33.1-299, Co~e of Virginia, as ~nd~d.
AND, BE IT FURT~ERRESOLVED, that a certified espy'of thls
resolution, be forwardsd to the Resident ~ngine~r ~or the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
~.~.l.b. APPRO¥ING T~,~ ADDITION OF A QO~gEOTIO~ ~OAD. TO
~OUTB ~51. OLAYPOI~ R0~9
On ~otie~ of ~r. McHala, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
adoDte~ the fgllowing resolution:
~q{EREA$, the ~irginia Depa=t~e~t of Transportation has
made ~anges' in =he secondary syst~ of state highways in
conjunctio~ with ~roject 0288-02Q-103~C501; a~d, a~ a r~ult,
is r~qu~stin~ =he Soard'oS Supervisors ~o approve the addition
of a connectio~ read to Route 651, Claypoint Road.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT R~OLV~D~ ~he Board of Supervlsor~
-identified as lB on a sketch by VDOT Traffic Enqineering, dated
pursuant to S~otion ~$.1-~99~ Code Of Virginia, as amended-
~D, D~ IT F~R~SOLVED, that = certified copy of t~is
' resolution be fo~arded to ~h8 Resident Engineer for ~m
Virginia Department of Transportation.
adopted the following resolution:
virginia during January 6 through 12, 1996~ President Clinton
ha~ issued a major disaster declaration for the State of
virginia, to include Chesterfield County, an~ implemented the
9~{~RF. AS, Chesterfield County will a~ply for rei~tbursement
assistance, %~he ~%ats of Virginia bus requested Chesterfield
County to desiqna=e an appliaan~s agent; and
~EREAS, the applicant's agent for c~es=6rfield county
County the application for federal disaster as~ia~ano~ and to
'£ile the application according to the resolutions, policies,
W~A$, th~ applicant'= agent will be authorized to
accep= and approprla~e for and in b~alf 0f ~e~tarfiel~ County
blizzard.
County Boar~ of Sup~rvi~or~, On behalf of it~ me,ers,
appli=~nt'~ ~g~n~ fur Chesterfield co~ty.
AND, BE TT FURTHER P~EOLUED, that a Copy of this
reselutlos bs permanently recorded among the papers of this
Board of supervisors of chesterfield County, Virginiu.
O~ ~ctio~ of Mr. MoHale, ~e~onded by Mr. Barber, 'the Boar~
adgpted th~ following resolution:
WHEREAS! th~ Boy Scouts of~erica Was incorp0ra~ed ~y Mr.
William D. Boyoe on Februa~ 8, 1910; and
~EREAS,,the Boy Scouts of ~erica was feunded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
W~ER~ aft~r~arning at least twenty-one meiit
a wide variety of field~, serving in a t~adership pouition in
co~unity~, being aative in th~ troop, demonstrating ~cout
~plrlt, an~ llvlng u~ =o the Scout Oath and Law;
WHEREAS, Mr- Rya~ G. Mar~h, Troo~,17~, sponsored by Second
Presbyterian Church, has accomplished those high ~tandard~
cc~i%men~ an~ ha~ reached the long-sought goal of Eag]~ Scout
which is received by le~s than two poraent o~ thoye individuals
entering the Scouting movement; and
]~EREAS, growing through h~ exDe~iences in Scouting,
l~arning th~ le~oDs'of r~on~ible oltlzenship, and ~riding
himself on ~e great aooomplishments of his county,
indeed a me, er of a new generation of pre~ared yegg citizens
of whom We can all be very proud.
NOW~ THE~FO~ BE IT RESOLED, that the Chesterfield
County Beard of Supervisors hereby extends its
to ~. Ryan G. Mar~h and acknowledges ~e good fortune of the
County to hav~ ~uch a~ o~t~anding youn~ man as one oS its
citizen~.
$.~.~,a. BERMUDA DX~XOT ~oR THE PUROHAeE AND IN$~LLATION OF
FIVE NO TRE~P~SIN~ SI~NS ~LON~IC~TED,
U~I/~PROVED RI~BT-OF-W-AY FOR THE E~ENSION OP
On motion of Mr. MCHale, seconded by ~. Barber, the
to th~ Enviro~tal Zngineerln~ Department fur .the
and installation o~ five no trespassing signs alon~ d~dicated,
but unimDrove~ right-of-way for the extension o~
96-134
8.C.2.b. MIDLOTHIANDI~TRICT FOR POST-FROH AOTIVITIES A~ JAH~S
RIVER HIGH SCHOOL
On motion of Mr. ~oHale, ~econded by Mr. Barber; the Hoard
transferred $1,000 from the Midlothiun ~istriot Three cent aced
Fund to the School Board for post-prom activities at James
River High school.
Vote: Unanimous
HILL DISTRICT FOR POST-~RO~ ACTI~I.TIES AT
CLOVER ~ILL. HIgH SCHOOL
on mctio~ of Mr. MoHale, ~econded by'~r. Barber, the Board
transferred $1,0~C from the Clover Hill District Thra~ ~ent
Rsad Fun~ to the Huhuul Hoard for po~t-prom ~Otivltles at
Clover Hill High School.
Vote: Unanimous
$,C,3. AUTHORISATXON FSI% THE COI~IHNXT~. ~RVI~ES BO~/~D TO
On motio~ of ~r- ~c~als, secondud by ~. Barber, th~ Board
Transit A~ini~tration Grant, to purchase two thirteen
passenger vans wi~ wheelchair li~ts, an~ ~o aooept and
aDDroDriate funds, if awarded. (It is Doted the local
for this Grant will be $16,400 and the sourGe of local funding
will be the replacement vehicl- reEerve managed by the County
Gar~g=. ~ Mental Health/Mental Re~ardation/S~stance
Department will be expecte~ to repay the reserve for the
$1~,400 using un amortization schedule based o~ ~
Vote: Unanimous
a.C.4. ~C~E~T~CE OF PARCELS O~ L~=ND '
· -C.4.&. 1%LOH~ OLD ~TAGE ROAD ~ROM 95--10 DEVELO~MEI~T, L,C-
On motion of Hr. MoHale, secondsd by Mr. Barber, the Board
accepted, on 'behalf of the county~ the conveyance of a Darcal
cf land containing 0.5~1 acres albng Old Stage Rood (state
Route 732) from ~$-10 Develcpment~ L.C., A Virginia L~mited
Liability Company, and authori~ed the County Administrato~ to
execute the necessary deed. (It i~ nc~e~ ~ cody o~ the plat is
file~ with the papers of this Bcur~.)
on mo~ion o~ ~, M~ale, ~econded by Mr. Barber, the Board
~ooep~ed~ on behalf of ~he County, ~h~ conveyance of a parcel
of land o0~taini~g ~.644 acren along Turner Road (State
643) from ~he Trustees of Co~ers~on~ Bap~i~ church, and
au~oriz~d th~ County A~ini~trator to execute the
of thi~ Board.) .
Vote: Unanimou~
S.C,4~ON~ ~ULL STREET ROAD, U.8. ROUTE 2~, ~K..~ORTBR
RROPERTIES
On notion of Mr. Mc~ale, seconded by ~r. Barber, the
accepted, on behalf of the County~ the OonYuyu-nc¢ of a
of land ¢ontai2ing 0.29~ aore~ along Hull $~reo= Road, ~.S.
Route S60~ f~em Po~te~ P~epe~t!es, and authorized the Co~y
A~tministrator to execut~ the necessary deed. (I% is noted a
copy of the vicinity.sketch i~ filed with the paper~ of this
Board.)
Vote: Unanimoua
RROUR~T TO OUSR~L~IH A SIXTEEN FOOT DP~NA~
AND TEN FOOT TB~tPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASE~4ENTS ACROSS
On motion o~ Mr. ~cHale~ seconded by ~r. ~arber, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Boa~d a~d th~ County
is noted a copy of the plat i~ filed with the papers of this
LINE EXTENSION ~HOJECT
On mo%ion of Mr. ~eHale, ~oconded by Mr. B~he~, the Beard
approved a water contract, as follows, for the Goodas Bridge
Road Wa=er Line E~:t~nsion Project; which project includes the
extension of 350 L.F. ± of sight inch affairs water lines and
60 L.F. ± Of additional improvements:
Developer: V. Cassel Adamsom~ Jr.
Contractor: , Excalibur Construction CorD~ratlen
Contraot A~ount= Estimated Total - $29,685.00
Total Estimated County Co~t:
Additional (Cash)
off~it~ (Re£u~d thru ~onnectlons)
Estimated Developer Cost
Code: · (Additional work ~efunds)
(offsite R~fandu)
~latrio~: clover ~ill
Vote: Unanimous
$
' $ 3,~61.E0
8.0,7. RET DATES FOR RUBLI~ HE~INGN
On motioh of Mr. McHale, ~e~onded by M~. Barber, the Board
the dat~ of M~r=h 1~, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. for a public heatlog tu
con~ider an ordinance to amend ~e Code of the County
section 14.1 relatinq to parkinq in ~paoe~ designated for
di~able~ individuals.
vot~: unanimous
S.C.7.b. TO CONSIDER ~%N ORDINANCE TO ~MEND. THE CODE OF THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS~ED.
~EENACTING ~ECTI~21.1-280 REL~T~N~TO
On motion of Mr. M~nle, s~conded by M~. Barber, =h~ Boa~d
~e date of March 27, 1~95 at 7:00 p.m. for a p~iic hearing to
' consider an ordinance to ~d the Code of the Co~ty of
~esterfleld, 1978, us mm=n~d, by amending an~ reunacting
Section 21.1-2~0 relating to ~it~ plan fees.
S.C,8. REOUEeT FOR EINGO/~uAFFLE PNRMIT~
On ~otion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Yir. Barber, the Beard
approved raffle permits for Leukemia society of America;
Kiwanis Club of Midlothian, Breakfast; and capital 2~rea Agency
..Vote: Unanimous
~THORI~TIOR FOR ~DVERTI~EMENT OF TAX ~L~TES FOR FY97
BUDGBT PROCESS
On motion o~ ~r. ~cHale, ~eoended by Mr. Barber, the Board
authorized the advertisement of tax rates~ the FY97 propomed
budget, and th~ FY97-20D1 ca~ital I~prov~ent Progr~.
Vo~e: Unanimous
8.C.10. ~PROPRI~TION OF INTERESt. ~N1NGe FROM VAR~OUSROND
ISBUEB AND FEDERAL G[t~,IT FURDS ~ ~SFE~ OF F~D5
TO T~ ~C~OOL ~IT~L Z~RO~HENT PR~ F~S
0~ motion 0f ~. M~I~, seconded by ~. Baobab, the Board
appropriated $240,936 from e~timat~d a~itional interest
~arning~ fro~ variou~ bond issues to th~ S~ool Capital
Impzovement (CIP Fund); appropriated $14,674 of PreSChool
federal grant funds to th~ School CIp Fund; and approved ~e
transfer of $300~000 fro~ ~e School CIP Reserve to ~e Sohool
CIP Fun~.
S..C..I~. ~PRO~AL OF FY1996 HID-YF~/~ S~HOOL BOA~ BUD(lET
REVISIONS
On motion of ~r. McHale, eeconded by ~r. Barber, the Board
decreased State ~ales tax, in the amount of $423,600 (which in
the same amount); increased Stets Basic Aid by $255,900~ Dlue
ot~er scats and local revenues i~ the ~ohool Operating Fund, by
$16~,700; reduced Operations and Maintenance Expenditure
Appropriation Category in the School's Operating Budget by
$43~,~64 -- transferring $157,200 tO the Administration/
Attendance and Hcatt~ Category an~ transfe~ing $2~0,964 to the
School's Reserve for capitul Projects in th~ General Fund; ~d
Vote: Unanimous
96-137
On 'motion of Mr. ~e~ale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the BQar~
of ~nvironmental Engineering which is included in the FY97
Vot~: Unanimous
9. ' REPORT~
On motion of .Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. ~e~alew the Board
accepted the following report~:
A ~eport on Developer Water and Sewer Contracts and a status
report on the General Fund Salance~ Re~erve for Future capital
Projectm; District Road an~ Street Light' Funds; Lease
~urcha~c~; and School Beard A~enda.
And, further, the Board acespted the following reads ~nto the
StAte Secondary System:
AP~OR LAKDING ~9.~IOB.~ - (E~ctive
Route 4~22 (Br~ntwood Arbor Cou~t]
Route 4821 (Cedar Landing Terrace] ~ From
Route 1~9 to 0.0~ mil~ ~outheaat Route 1569 0.08 Mi
Route 4823 (Heather ~anding Place) - From
CABIN CREEK W~ST - {~feotlve 1-16-96)
Route 3304 (Baches Bluff Way) - From ~.0~
Route 3303 (Boone= Trail 91aoel -
0.03 mile Southwest Route ~Z57 to Route
Route 3302 (~oones Trail Terrace) - From
DEER RUN. SE~_7_...r.(Effective 1-~6-96)
Route 5045~(Sold Forbes Court) - ~rom Rout~
Route 5044 (Bold Forbes Lane) - From Route
· 9~ to 0.17 mile Southwest Route 4999 .0..17
Route 4700'(Deer R~n Drive] - From 0.08 mile
2/~8/96
96-135
Ro~=e $049 (G~nulne Risk Ceurt) - From Route
5048 to 0.05 mile NorthWeSt Route 5048
RC~C 5045 (~eDuino Risk Lane) - From Route
4922 to Route 4700
Route 5049 (Northern Dancer Court) - From
Route 4922 to 0.14 mile West Route 4922
ROUte 5042 (secretariat Court) - From Route
49~2 to 0.08 ~ile West Route 4922
R'outo ~9~2 (Secretariat Drive) - Frem 0.06
~ile Southeast Route 4920 ~o 0.6~ mile
Southeast R~ut~ ~920
Rout~ 5046 ($~nday Silence Court) - ~rom
Route 5046 to 0.o& mile West Route 5046
Route 5046 (Sunday Sile~oe Lane) - From
Rout~ 654 to ROUte 492~ North
Route 49S7 (winning Colors Lanel - From
0.04 mile Southeas~ Route 4989 to Route 5048
'Vote: Unanimous
O.O5 Mi
0.14 Mi
0.52 Mi
0,04 Hi
0.3~ Mi
~1. D~NNER
On mo~iun o~ ~r. ~arb~r, seconded by F~r. ~Hale, th~ Board
recessed to the Administration Buildinq, ROO~ 502~ for dinner.
Reconvening:
~r. stith g=¥= th~ invocation-
13. PLED~E OF i%LLEGT~/~C~ ~O ~E FLA~ OF TH~ DNITED_S~AT~S OF
Boy S¢out~ Troop ~06 V~nture Crew led the Pledge of Allegiancm
to the Flag of the United States cf A:ne~ioa.
On motion of Mr. HcHale, seconded by ~r. Barb~r~ the Board
suspended it~ ruie~ at thi~ time to amend the agenda end
consider Item 7.A.3., Appointment to the Solid Wa~t~ Advisory
Committee, at thi~ time.
?,A. APPOINTMENTS
?.~.3, ~OLID W~STE ~DVISORY CO~ITTEE
On mo~ion of ~r. ~c~al~, ~e¢ond~ b~ ~ir, Barber, the Board
suspended its rules at this time ta allow ~inultaneous
nomination/appointmen% of a member to ~erYe ua the Solid Waste
Advisory Committee,
96-~9
On motion of Mr. McKals, ~conded by Mr. Warren, the Board
si~nltaneo~sly nominated/appointed ~r. Tim G~rzycki,
representing Dale District, to ~rve on the solid Waste
Advisory Committee, who~e term is effective immediately and
14. KEZOL~TIOR~ ~ND S~ZCI~L...RECOGNITIO~
14.A. RECOGNIZING M~.,.JACK NODGE, ~IRGINI~ D~THE~ OF
/dr. McCracken introduced ~, Jack Hodqe who was pre~ent to
inspiration to many peopl~ over the many years and his se~ie=
will ~ missed.
On motion of ~he Board, the following resolution was adoptad:
~E~AS, Mr. 3a~k ~. ~o~g~ began his career wish the
virginia Departmant of Transportation in t957 and, in ~964,
became Resident ~ngfneer in ~a~ham aad la,er sm~ed am
District Englnemr for the Riuhmon~ Con~tru~tion District and
became District Enginae~ fo~ the Suffolk Construction District
in 197~; and
~REAS, Mr. ~odge b~oa~ chief Engineer in 1988, a
pe~itio~ ~O~ible for ~upurvising all design a~
construction functions of the Uirq~ni~ Department of
Transportation; and.
~sociatton of State Highway and Transportation official~
~resi~ent'= ~p~oial Award of Merit; and
~S,' ~. .Ho~g~'s aqcomplishmen=s include, a~ong
others, the const~ction of Chippe~am ~arkway, Powhite Parkway
Extmnsfon, Route 288, a~d the Varina-Enon Bridge and the
improvements of Route ~0, Route 60, Route 3~0, Courthouse. Road;
and
have enhanced~esterfield'~ economic p~o~p%~ity mnd~ality of
NOW, THEREFOR~ ~ IT RESOLVED, that t~e Chesterfield
County Board of Sup~rvimo=s publiGly recogniaem the outstanding
oont~ibution~ o9 Mr. Jao~ s. Hodgu and expremm~ its
app=eciatCon fur his xervica to th~ County and their best
wishes for a long and happy retirement.
~D~ BE IT ~TMER~EOLVED, ~hat th~ ~esterfield cowry
Board of Supezvisors hereby recognizes Mr. gack S. Hodge a~ a
Honorary' me~er of th~ chesterfield county Transportation
Department and an Honorary lif~tim~ ~iti~n of ch~sterfiel~
~D, BE IT F~THER RESOLVED, that a copy of this
resolution b~ presented to ~r. ~odge and =hat ~hiu ru~olutlon
be .p~anently recorded among ~e papers of this Board ~f
Supervisors of chesterfield Csunty, Virginia.
V~te: Unanlmou~
Mr. Daniel pressntsd the sxssuted resolution to Mr. Hedge,
exprsssed appreciation for hi~ dedicated service to VDOT and
Che~terfie%d, and wished him wall in his retirement.
Mr. John Cngbill~ a member cf the Commonwealth Transportation
Board, stated Mr. Eo~g~ is a leader and a teacher, and wished
him and his family well in the future.
~r. R~/~sey stated Mr. Hedgewas aiways receptive to new i~eas
~nd presented him with a silver plate, on b~half of County
staff, for hi~ year~ of service to the State of Virginia and
C~e&terfield.
M_r. stith pre~ented a gif= to ~r. Hedge, on behalf of the
County's Transportation Department, expressed appreclat~on for
his ~ervise to ~EOT and the County, and wished him well in the
future.
Mr.'Hedge expressed appreciation for the recognition and stated
it has been an honor to work with Chesterfield county.
ATTAI~IN~ KA~K OF EAGL~
On motion of the Board~ the followihg r~solutlcn wes adopted:
WHEREAS, thc Boy Soeut~ of America was inoorporate~ by Mr.
William D. Eoyoe on February S, t~107
WHeReAS, ~hs BOy Scouts of Amerlca was ~ounded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
WI{ER~AS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badge~ in
a.wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership Dosltlon in
a troop, oarrying out a '~ervioe project beneficial to his
e~unity, being active in the troop, demonstrating SCout
spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Steven H. Wh~ler, Troo~ S94, sponsored by
Saint David's' Episcopal Church, has accompli=hed those high
standards of commitment and has reae~ed the long-sought goal of
Eagle scout which is received by ls~s than two ps,cent of those
individual~ ~nte~ing the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Securing,
leaning ~.he lessons of responsible citizenship, end priding
himuelf on t~e great asoomplishments of his County~ Staves is
indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens
of whom we da~ all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED~ tha~ th~
County ~oa~ ~f Supervisors hereby exten~s its congratulations
to Mr. Steven E. Wheeler and ao~nowledgem the good fortune of
the county ~o have such an out,tending young man am on~ of its
citizens.
Vote: Unanimous
~. Warren presented the executed re~oluticn tn Mr.
accompanied by members of his family, songratulate~ him on h~s
out,tending achievements, and wished hi~ well in his future
96-141
o To CONSIDE~ ~E B~OBOSED FY97 THROUGH FY02 S~COND;URY ROAD
~IX Y~m/~IM~ROVEME~TBL~%NL~Y97 S~CONDA~y ROAD IMPROVEMENT
BUD~: ~ FY97 CHE~T~FIELD ~0AD ~
~S,. H~ph~ey stated Cue of ~e project~ in ~ proposed FY97
Secondary Road Six Y~ar Imgrovaman~ ~lan is lcca~ed on
~treet on which ~he re~ide~, declared a conflict-of interest
heF~elf from the meetin9.
~. Daniel noted that th~ Walke~ Quarter Road Project,
referenced by Mrs. Humphr~ has been proposed inthe Plan for
a n6~,r of yearn, prior to her election.
~. McCraoken stated this date and time has been advertised for
a p~blic hea~i~g to consider the proposed FY97-FY02 secondary
Road Six Year Improvement Plan; ~Y~7 Secondary Road Improvement
Budqet; and ~97 Chesterfield Road F~d. He further stated
Budqet~ and Road Fund and resogni~d Mr. Jim Smi~ Resident
Whe~ asked, M~. McCruCk=n stated staff ia reco~nding that the
leveled off a~d th= widening would negatively impact businesses
Project bs converted into a project to improve drainag~
problems in ~he area an~ 'to conmtTuct sidewalks in the
begin to improve the ~rainage .problems and construct the
sidewalks.
~. JOe Gary, Chai~an of the Don Air ~illage Preservation
co~i~tee~ ~=ate~ ~he Co~itt~e opposes the wideningof Fo~est
~ilI Avenue; that the Co~ittee feel~ the widening would
counter-~roduo=ive to ~e Ben Air Village co,unity; and
the co~ittee feels the allocated fund~ for th~ wid~uing ~an
mor~ beneficially used to correct the c~binq and drainage at
the intersection of For~t ~i~l Ave~e add ~ord Ro~d and
throughout the general co~ercial a~ea. She further stated
~at the ~idew~lk$ wqul~ b~ ~Gonomically beneficial ~o
oo~unity and reguested the B0a~d to u~ppurt the reallocation
of the portion of ~m funds from ~e. wi~ening ~roJ~c~. She
~ec~lzed several ~e~bers of the Co~ittee who were pre~ent at
~e meeting.
f~rthe~ ~tated 225 accidents occurred along Old Hundred Road
from 1987 to April, 199~, with 59 of ~e a~uidents involving
i~Juries. She requested the Board to includ~ road i~prov~ent~
on old Hundred Road in t~e FYOT-FY02 Seoondary Ru~d Six Y~ar
Improvement ~lan.
Kr. ~eorge Bemdles requested the Board to consider starting~e
Projects along Walmsley Boulevard Project at Newby~ Bridge Road
Falling ~eek Bridge ~o0ner than rec~ended in ,the Plan.
~e~e being no one else %o address ~is issue, the public
h~arlng wa~ closed.
-- J[ ........... J I .J L .... I
.When asked, Mr. McCraoken stated the construction of the
shoulders along 01d Hundred Roa~ has already begun and further
recommendations in the Plan include funding to improve the
shoulders along the east side cf Old Hundred Road. He further
stated the recommendation for completion of the 01d He,cited
Road Project is scheduled for 1999, however, staff will meet
with VDOT to see if this project, and others in the Plan,
at Newby's bridge Intersection is ~cheduled to begin in 1998
and the curves on Newbys Brldgs Read is scheduled to begin in
the year 2000~
When asked, F~r. EcCraeken stated the Spruce Avenue Rural
Addition PreJ~ot was included in the Plan as one of the F~97
r~ral addition projects, with the other being Celestial Lane.
approved the FY97 through FYO2 Chesterfield Road F~nd SiR'Year
Project Development .Schedule; autheri~d .the County
Administrator to enter into Virginia Department of
TransDorts%ion/Coun%y/cons~ltant/contraotor]design, right-of-
?way acquisition, and/or construction agreements, acceptable to
:the County Attorney, for the Pre~ects; appropriated, from the
General Road Improv~ment~ Account, $35,000 for the Spruce
?Avenue Rural Addition Projeqt and $3s,000 for the Celestial
Lane Rural A~dition ~roject; and adopted the following
resolution:
EEREAS, the Board of Supervisors oS Ches=e~£ield County
and the Virginia Dep~rtment of Transportation (VDOT) have
conducted a p~blio ~esrimg on t. he P~95-97 through FY01-02
S~condary Road Six Year Improvement ~lan; and
W~ER~AS, the Board co~c~3fs with th~ proposed pro3ects
identified in the plan.
~OW~ THEI~EFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
Cowry Board of Supervisors approves the ~ix Y~ar Secondary
Road Improvement Plum us presented by VDOT.
On motion of ~. Warren, s'econded by Mr. McHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
~HEREA$, t/~e virginia Department o~ Transportation
ha~ submitted its proposed FY~6-97 S~eadary Road I~provement
b~dget to tho County: and
WHEREAS, =he budget represents the imple~entatlon of the
first year of V~OT's Six Yea~ Improvement Plan adop=e~ by the
NOW, THEREFORE B~ IT RESOLVED~ that the chesterfield
County ~oard of Supervisors approvem t~e FY96-9?
On motio~ of Mr. Warren, seconded by ~r. ~eHale, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHE~A$, eection. 33.1~75.l of tko Code of Virginia pe~its
th~ Co~n~enweal~l% Transportation ~eard to make an equivalent
matching allocation to any county for designations by the
governing body of up to 2~% er eeoc,oeo, whichever is greater,
of funds received by it du~i~gthe C~e~t fiscal year pursuant
to t2%e "State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 197~" for use
by the Co~onwealth Transportation Board to co~trnct,
maintain, or improve primary and secondary highway s~stsms
within such County; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of 8~pervisors
anticipates appropriating $5~0,000 for the Chesterfield Road
Fund with the adepti05 Of thu ~96-97 appropriation re~clution;
and '
WHEREAS, Vb0T has notified the County that $500,000 is the
ma~im~ amount of Chesterfield County fun~s that will be
NOW, TREREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors anticipates appropriating $§00,'000
tn be~ matched by the State for the PY96-97 Chesterfield Road
Fund, formerly Revenue Sharing Program.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the matched funds be
allooated fo~ the following projects:
$717~41S Centre Street Extension from Che~ter Road
~o R~ute 10 ($S~8,709 ~DOT and $358~709
county)
$~8~,5$~ Old Hundred Road Shoulders
from Millridge Parkway to Genito Road
($14t,~91 ~q)OT and $141,191 Count~)
Ayes : Mr. Daniel, Mr. Warren, Mr. Barber, and Mr. McRal~.
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a 255 foot
cem~unioation~ tower in an Agrioultural (A) Dimtriot. Tho
density bf ~uoh amendment will be controlled by zoning
eonditioDs or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
de~ignate~ the property for general industrial u~e. This
request li~s on 0.3 acres £ronting approximately 12 feet on the
east line of Allied Road, approximately'2,800 ~eet south of
Nr. Jaeobson ~tated the applicant is raqu~stinq a 60-day
deferral.
~o one ~a~e £orward to spea~ in favor of or a~ainst
d~f~rral.
On motion Df ~r. Mc~ale, seconded b~ ~r. Warren, th~ Board
deferred Case 96SN0171 until April ~4, 1996.
Vote: Unanimous
In ~ermuda ~aqisterial District, CH~BLES L, ~¥LOR, J~. AND
MI~HA.EL S. TAYLOR requested Conditional Use to allow a nobile
home to be =5md for storage in a General Buslnass (C-5)
Distriot. The density of such amendment will be controlled by
zoning conditions or ordinance s~andards. The Comprehgneive
Plan designutes the property f~r general comnercial use. This
request lies On 0.9 acres known as ~93~ Jefferson Davis
~ighway. Tax ~ap S7-t2 (~) B~llwood Addition, Block D~ Bart of
LOt 1
Mr. JacoBson present6d a s~ary of Case 96SN0162 and stated
the Pla~ing co~isslon and staff r~cu~mnd approval ~ubjeot to
conditions. Me further ~tat~d s~aff teen--ends approval only
96-144
for a three year time period because the mobile home has
used for storage since late 198S with ne apparen~ detriment to
area ~roper~ies and because th~'Jefferson Davi~ Corridor Plan
encourages permune~t investment and facade i~proveme41t[] along
the corridor.
Mr. Charlie Taylor stated the recommendation i~ acceptable.
There was no oppo~itlon present.
On motion of Mi. McHate, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved Case 96SN0162 subject ko tho following conditions:
1. The mebile home shall not be usmd for residential
, purposes. The use of the mobile home shall be l±~ited to
storage of materials associated with the aperatlon of a
convenience store on the subject property.
2. There shall be no permanent additxoDs to the mobile home.
The mobile hom~ shall be skirted but shall not be placed
on a permanent foundation.
~4. The m~bile ho~e ~hall be located to the east of and side
cf any permanent building.
This conditional Uss shall be g~anted for a p~riod of
.three (3) yearm from dot= of approval.
Vote: Unanimous
requested Conditional Use to ~s~u~it a 150 9oct co~u~unis~tisns
tower in an Agricultural (A) District. The ~ensity of such
amendment will be controlled by zoning conditions or Or41nance
standards. TheCom~rehensive ~lan d~signates the property for
residential use of 1.01 to 2.5 units per agra. T~is request
lies on 5.0 acres fronting approximately ~$~ feet on the sOUt~
line of River Road, approximately ~50 feet east oS Halloway
Avenue. Tax Hap 156-4 (I)-Parcel.70. (Sheet
cunditions.
John ¢ogbilI, Msquire', representing %he applicant, stated t--he
wan uppuaition to the request, it would be placed in
regular sequence on the agenda.
96~N0190
In Bermuda ~agis=erial District, THB CHEST~R~Z~LD.CO~'~TY BOARD
O~ 8~PERVISO~ requested ~ezoning from Agricultural (A}
Co~unity Busine~ (C-~) of 0.$ acres.. Also~ requested is
um~dm~nt to Conditional U~e Planned Developm~t
~emainder of River's Bend included in Ca$~ 9~S~0109 and bulk
excaptiuns r=lativu to setbacks, so~eening of loading
and uuher re~ir~en~m where, adjacent to 9rop~rty
agriculturally or residentially, The density of such
will b~ controlled by zo~in~ conditions ur Ordinance standard~.
~e Comprehensive Plan designate~ the property for c~ercial
an~ light indu~trlal use and Sar rmsidantial u~e of A.01 to 7.0
~nit~ p~r acre. Thi~ r~qu~t 1~ on 17~.1 acr~ fronting the
we=t llne of Routm 1-295, ~he north an4 suu~h lines
96-145
Meado%~ville Road, the north llne of Bermuda Hundred Road, and
the north llne of East Hundred Road, approximately ~0 feet
west of Kingston Av~n~e. Tax Map 118-6 (1) Paroels 16w 17 and
18; Tax Map 115-7 (1}"ParCe! I and Tax Hap liS-10 (1) P~rt of
Parcel 34 (Sheet
~Lr. Jucob~on presented a summary of Cuse 96SN0190 nnd ~tated
the Planning Commission and staff raeummend aDpruval of the
rezoning, and approval of th~ a~endment to the conditional use
Rlanne~ ~aveloRment (caa~ ~5S~0109), su~jec~ to one oon~itlon.
He Doted the request eoufo~s to the Ea~t~n A~e~tLa~d~U~e~d
Tramauor%a%ion P!un.
~. C~bill, representing the applican~ stated =he
reco~endation is acceptable. Ee stated the applicant has~en
working with ~e New Be~uda Association on this re,est and
will continue to work with the Association and area residents
to addres~ any con=ems. Ther~'wa~ no opposition
0n notion of ~. McKale~ ~conde~ by Mr~ Barber, the Board
approve~ Ca~e 9~$N0%90 ~ubj~ct ~o th~ ~ollowlng con~itlon:
~DMENT OF CASE 95SN010~
TAe conditions attached to~e application, duted Feb~ury
(NOT~: With th= ag~ru~al of ~is re, em%, con~ition~ of
zoning approval fo~ Case 9~SN0109 applicable to the I-1
f~rther as amended herein, remain in effect.)
Vote: Unanimou~
re~st~d Conditional Us~ t~ permit ~ 1~0 foot co~ni~ation~
tower in an Agricultural (A) District. The density of
amendment will be controlled by zoning condlt~on~ or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan desiqnates the property for
lin~ of River Road, approximately ~o f~t east of aalloway
Avenue. Tax Map 186-4 (1') Pa~oel 70 (sheet 52).
the Pla~ing do~ission and staff race,end approval subj~c~
John cogbill, Esquire, representing %ha aDpl~cant, ~tatad
Kr. George Beadles expressed concerns about the numar of
to develc~ standards that r~lute and limit th~ n~er of
co~unic~tions %ower~ =onstru=ted in th~ County.
~. Cogbill stated ther~ are three way~ to =onst~ot thi~
of tower and construction of this partioular tower is the l~a~t
offensive,~ i~ te~ of it~ profile, and i~ the ~e~oDd mo~t
e~ive form of tower to con~truct. Ee further stated the
applicant ha~ att~pted to !oea%e its tow~r~ t9 ~iDi~iz~ th~
tower is replacing ~e ~10 foe= tower of ~ r~s=u~ s~a~ with
r~sou~ squad an~ pay r~ on Dhat tow~; that the tower
al~o se~e as a back-up tower for the County's ~I1 syst~; and
M~. H~mphrey stated ~he appreolstes tho efforts of
in a~dressing the concerns of
F~s. Humphrey then made a not~on, seconded by Hr. B~rber, for
the board to 8pprove Case 965N0173 subject to the following
1. The tower ~nd any associated equiDmen~ shall be 10eared so
as to provide a minimum lb0 foot perimeter of existing
mature vegetation bstwesn the tower and adj'ac~nt
properties and public right~ of way. The exact location
shall be approved Dy'the Planning Department at the tim~
of'site plan review.
A minimum 100 foot buffer ~hall be maintained around the
perimeter of the tower. ~xoept for acoe~ an~ utilities,
which may ~e extended genera!ly perpendicular through this
buff~r~ ~istlng mature veqetatlon within ~i~ Duffer
shall be pra~urved and ~intained. ~xist~ng vegetation
shall be supplemented where necessary with trees of
specles having an aver%ge minim~ ma~e crown ~pread of
greater tha~ thirty (90] feet and a minimum caliper cf 3.5
least one (1) tr%~ for each twenty (20) tin,al feet
buffer. In addition, cleared areas oS 300 s~ar~ feet or
gre.at~r shall b~ plan%ed with t~ees, as described
to a~hieve a minimum d~nsity of one (1) tr~m ~or mach 300
s~are fe~t of Glear6~'~r~a. At th~ time of site plan
review, a landacapln~ ~lan d=plc~ing ~is retirement
shall b~ submitted to the ~lanning D~purtment fo~
approval.
3. wi~in sixty (60) day~ of the ermc=ion o~ any
tower, the existing tower depicted on th~ plan prepared
1~95, ~halt be removed.
There ~hall be no ~i~ns pe~itted to identify ~e tower
The ba~e of ~e tower shall be enclosed by a minimum six
(6} ~ooe ~igh ~ence, d~si~e~ to preclude trespassing,. A
d~tailed plan depicting~ this requirement shall be
submltt~d %o %~ plannin~ Department for approval
conj~otion with final site plan review. (~) .
6, In ~onjunction with site plan ~u~ission,
owner/developer shall ~b~i= ~oo~en=a~ion as to wh~th~r
F~ ~pproval is r~ired for the =~ectio~ of ~
If F~ a~prov~l i~ ~e~i~d, prior to release of a
to =he Planning Department. (P)
7. The ~cwer and ~ipm~nt ~allbe designed and installed
as not to interfere with the Chesterfield Co~ty
engineering study to dete~ine ~e possibility of radio
fre~enoy interference w{th ~e County system. Prior to
release of a building pe~it, the study shall be submitted
to, and approve~ by,. =he chesterfiel~ County
Co~unicati~n~ and Eleet~o~ic~ ~taff.
~. The developer shall be respo~ibi~ for correcting any
fre~ency problems which affeo~ ~e ~s~erfi~l~ County
~lic Safety Tr~ed System caused by this us~. Such
=orre=tlons shall bu mad~ i~ediatel~ upon notification
th~ Chesterfield Co~ty Co~unlcatlon~ and Electronics
~=aff.
9. Th~ treatment, oolor an~ li~htlng ~tem for ~e tower
~ha11 be a=
96-1~7
ll.
the Planning Department. . In general, the tower
shell be of a monoDole design with a min~al
diameter. F~rther, any antennas or other tower-
~nun:ed ~quigment shall be spaesd, placed and of
such dimensions so as to minimize the visual impact.
b. Th~ tower mhall b~ grey or another ~neutral
acceptable to the Plenn{ng Department.
c. If lighted, lighting during da~liqh~ hours shall he
limited to medium intensity strobe lights with
upward reflection and l~ghting during night time
hours shall be limited to soft bllnkln~.llghts.
All drlvewayz and parkin~ areas ~hall be graveled er paved
and maintained to minimize dust problxm$ and provide ease
O= ingress and egre~s. (P)
Any building 9r m~oh=niual ~quipme~t shell comply with
Section ~1.1-~48 of the Zoning 'Ordinance relative to
~er~eninq of m~chanical equipment. (P)
(NOTE: This condition would require the
meohanical equipment located on any building or on the
ground from adjacent propertie~ and public rights of way.
screening would not be required for the towe~ o~ tower-
mounted equipment.)
At eueh time that the ~ower oeases to be used for
communioation~ purpoae~ for a period exceeding twalv~ (12)
consecutive months, the owner/developer shall dismantle
asd re~ove the tower and all associated equipment from the
property. (P)
Vote: Unanimous
In Dale Megimteriul District, TRTON ~;T~RES OF VIRGINIa, ~NC.
reques~e~ rezoning Zrom Residential (R-7) to Neighborhood
Business CC-~) with. Conditional Use ~laneed Development to
stere/pharma~y is planned. ~owever, with the approval of thi~
re~uast, ot~er C-2 use~ could be developed on t~e property.
The density of such amendment will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The comprehensive Plan
deeignate~ the property for o£fiee u~e. This request lies on
1.7 acres knovn aa 5926 Hopkins Road, Tax ~a~ 52-12 (1)
10 (Sheet 15).
proposed ~eve!o~nt and land use do not oomDly with the
Central A~ea Land U~e and T~_~.s~t.~t~.a~; the
setback exce~tion~ and~ster Plan represent an
of the property; and the applicants have failed to ad~ems the
~. Jim Theobold, representing the appllcan%, ~tat~d
opportunity to mak~ the area r~vitalization plan a realitN.
entered into ~ reoord a oopy of letter f~om M~, Elliot
~isenberg, D.C., clini= Director- at Dominion ~iro~ractic
Clinic 'Limited expressing his support of the request.
p~esented a brief ove~vie~ of t~e site a~d stated Walgreen
2/28/96
the largest re~ail drug store chain in the nation and they hope
to open approximately 20 stores in Richmond over the next few
year~. He further stated the applicant has .placed it~
entrances as far away from tho corner of the intersection of
Hopkins Read end Meadowdale Boulevard as possible and that the
~ite plan depicts the relief being sought On the sideyerd
setbacks from thirty feet to ~ive £aat and a redustion in the
setback requirements against the el~entary school fro~ forty
feet to fifteen feet. He presented a brief overview of 'the
significant distance and screen that exist around the sate end
~tated the d~ug stere will provide a drive throughservice for
prescription drugs; that the applicant prohibited the sale of
alcoholic beverages in its totality; and that the applicant has
agreed to build a sidewalk along Meadowdale Boulevard ts
connect wit~ the existing sidewalk on the library property.
~rther stated access has been limited to one entrance from
Hopkins Road and that the applicant has proZfered to construct
a raised median along Hopkins Road, in addition to providing u
right turn la~e into the site from Hopkins. He stated since
tho Planning Commission meeting, the applicant has amended its
proffers to permit only an entrance off Hopkin~ Read and ts not
~havm an exit onto Hopkins. Hs ~urther stated d~velopm~nt will
officlals~, and Planning staff have spent eoR~tle~ehour~ in an
~e ~tated approving this request could be u real catalyst for
the request.
~r. Steve Berrell stated he feels approving thi~ ~quest wo~ld
be a win s~tuatlon for all parties' involve4 and ~ha~
applioan~ .ha~ at~p~e~ to addr-~ all concerns raised.
fur~er Stated safety concerns were the only oon¢~rns
by the ~lanning Co--lesion and that he feels those concerns
hav~ now been ad~essed by t~e applicant. He stated he feels
this land has no other viable use %ha~ the %~ of use
request.
has no personal gain in' the action 0f thim r~e~t, but area
t~e of development will generate economic gain fo~ the a~ea
January ~3, 1996 the Meadowbrook ~state~/civic Associatio~ held
in ~upport of the project and seven percent in opposition.
~. Beth D~um ~tated he~ pro~rty balm up to ~e Hopkins
. El~ntary School Pro~ect nn~ a~res~e~ her ~u~por% of the
project. She f~er stated she has b~n involved in
appreciation to~e applicant for their ~fforts in working with
Walgreen will be a positive influence to area businesses;
there are traffic concmrn~ at th~ ~intersection of Hopkins Road
and Meadowdale Boulevard, h0weveM, Walgree~ i~ not-~e and or
=~ beginning os ~0~e pro, lams; an~ that =he applicant has
attempted to ad~ss any truffAc concerns. She re~Sted
intersection of Hopkins Road and Meadowdale Boulevard
~. Barber excu=ed him=elf from the
the number o£ accidents that have o=¢urred at the intersection
of Hopkins Road and Meadowdale Boulevard and that he feels
approval of the request would cause more traffic problems at
the i~terseotion, He stated he feels there will not be any
economic advantage to anyone in thi~ area i~ tho request,is
approved.
Mr+ Ronald Livingston complimented the 'applicant for their
efforts in working with the citizens on this request, however,
expressed his ~pposition to the request. He further stated he
hazard; that the parcel is too.small for the proposed projeot~
zoning by exception detrimental to the area.
Ms. Patrfcia Lohr, President of ~ugua Farm~ C~vlc A~zeoiatien,
~tated there are four drug s~ores located within one and a half
miles of the proposed ~te; that ~he doe~.net feel the area can
aupport e fifth dr~g store; and atated that the development
the Aaaociatlon is not oppoaad to progress, but is requesting
re~dent~ and requested t/~e Board to ~eny ths request.
~r. Theobcld ~tated %he applicant has agreed to many
would improve existing conditions.
Mr. Daniel stated this request has racalve4 a lot of public
input and a. lot. of effort has gone into the r~quest in an
and Meadowdale. ~oulevard is very busy; that there was
o~erwhelming support of this project hy the Meadowbrook civic
A~sooiation; that he sees more of a greater good by approving
the rag%lest; and that the propo~ed land u~e ~s better than the
existing land use. He stated if the requeEt i~ approved~ the
County's Transportation Department will begin assessing tra£f~c
~oulevard amd that after considerable thought and citizen
~npu=~ he fael~ the proposed development will be .good for ~he
area. ~e expressed appreciation to everyone who has ~utforth
efforts in rejuvenating the Meadowdale Shopping center and
stated h9 supports approval of the proposed request and
initiate the necessary study to identify any necessary traffic
~r. Dan~el then ~ade a ~0ticn, ~econded b~ Mr, Warren, for the
~roffe~¢d conditions:
1. ~J=tg~_O a~ El~yations. Subject to the proffered
conditions aDDli0able to this casa, the Property shall be
developed in =ubntantial conformanc~ with ~i) ~he si~e
plan dated May 1~, 1995~ last revised september ~1¥ 1995,
~ntitled 'Proposed Walgreens Conceptual Mas~er Plan'
prepared by J. K. Timmon~ & A~oc~te~, ~.C.~ mhd ({~)
'Proposed Walgreene Illustrative Plan", bo=h of which have
the time of site Plan review can approve modifications
requested by the developer if such modifications are
deemed to ¢0mp~y with the spirit and intent of the site
plan and elevation~ submit%ed herewith.
Use Restrictions.
shall be as follows;
(¢)
The only ames permitted' on the propei~cy
Drugstore/pharmacy/labOratory~
Bank~ and savings and loan associations;
Offices; business, governmental, medical
professional;
(d) Drive-in windows sad outside intercom systems
associated with the foregoing permitted
(e) Accessory use~, not otherwise prohibited,
customarily accessory and incidental to a permitted
Ne outdoor vending machines and/or outdOOr pay phones
~hall be permitted an the Propar=y. The sale of alcoholic
prohibited.
Sidewalk. The developer shall construct a sldawa~k.alo~g
Hopkins Road to connect wit~ the existinq ~idnwalk on
Meadowdale BouleVard. The exact location, width and
~reatment shall be approved at the time of $i~e Plan
Review.
Starmwater Disoharns. stUrmwater shall be stored sot hat
~he storage ~olume is that of e 10 year post-development
storm with a release of e 2 year pr~-development storm.
All on-site ~tcrag~ shall be underground.
Access. Access from Hopkins Road shall be limited to one
(1) entrance, which entrance shall be limitsd to right-in
tra£fio movements. Thi~ entran¢~ shall be located near
the southern property llne. No direo= exit ~hal! be
pe~mitted frsm the Property to ~opkins Road. ACCESS to
Meadowdale Boulevard shall be llmi%ed =o one
entrance~exit, Thi~ acce~ shall be located near the
western property line,. The ~xact leos=ion e£
acdeeses shall be approve~ by th~ Transportation
Department.
~eadowdale InDrovements - Prior to the i~suance Of an
occupancy permi=, additional pavement shall b e Constructed
along Meadowdale Boulevard at the approved access to
provide la~t and right turn lanes, if warranted, ba~ed on
Transportation Department standards, The developer
dedicate, ~rsa and un~estristed~ to and for thc benefit of
Chesterfield County, any additional right-of-way (or
easement) required £or these i~provements.
Ko Loudspeakers - Outslda loudspeakers ~h&ll be
prohibited. The use Of intercom-type systems co,only
associated with drive-through facilities shall be
permitted.
~Lr~Ai~l- Ail landscaping within the buffer and setback
area~ shall be irrigated.
Mop, ins Road ImDrovemen=s.. Prior to the issuan¢~ of an
occupancy permit, udditionul puvcmcnt shall be
slon~ Hc~kins Rua~ a= t~e a~proved access to provide a
right tu~cnlane. Th~ o~ner/developer ~hall dedicate, free
and ~nrestrlctsd, to and far tha.beneflt of Chesterfield
County. ~ny additional right-of-way (or easement) required
for the forega{ng improvements. As and when re,sire4 and
approved by the Virginis Department of TranEportation, the
owner/~eveloper shall he respunsible for providing a
96"151'
raised median in Hopkins Road from Meadowdale Boulevard
south to restrict Hopkins Road acce~ to the Property to
right-in moYemsntn only. The exact design and location of
such median ~hall be determined by the Virginia Department
of Transporta=ion.
Vote: Unanimous
~n Bermuda Magisterial District, HILL DEVBLOPKE~TA~O~., LTD~
re~uented amendment to Conditional Use Planned DeVelopments
(Cases 86S097, 875055, 885N0061 and SPSN032~) to permit
family dwellings and bulk exceptions in a R~identiel (R-7)
District% Specifically, the applicant ~s proposing to
oen~truet fifty-five (55) single family dwxllings on lot~
having a minimum of 5,000 square feet, yielding a density of
approximately 4.7 units per acr~. F~rthe=, exceptions to
sotbauk and lot frontage regulrements is rAquested. The
Comprehensive Plan designates the property for.resldential use
of 4.01 ts 7.0 units pst acre. This request lien on 11.8 acren
fronting approximately 1,100 feet on th~ north line oS
Irnnbrid~s Parkway, also fronting approximately 500 feet on the
quadrant of the in~ers~otion of these roads. Tax Map 114-6
Part of Parcel · (~heut
Ks. B~verly Mu~etman, ~lanning A~ministrator, presented
sugary of ca~e 96SNO148. ~en asked, ~he ~tated in addition
to the County r~tr~m~nt of a ~5 foot buffer, ~here was also
covenants. She further stated the covenants ar~ no% ~
detail relative to what hms to be put in the 35 foot area and
through the 'su~ivision process, ~taff will. requir~
developer to provid~ t~aa p~e~vation plans, ms well
landscaping plans, to address the specifics of what is pu~ into
the b~ffa~ ames. She Continued to present a ~u~ry of Case
approval subject to on= condition. She noted-th~
confo~s =o =he Central ~ea Land Use au~ Transportation ~!an.
~kit~ Rudy, Entire, representing ~he a~plicant, ~tated the
~eco~ndation is acceptable. ~e ~er ~tated that the
app!foan~ i$ willing to address the conserns abou~ the buffer;
~at the reduction in density will be a benefit to the Arbor
many ~ester area residents ~ill be interested in this t~e
housing d~v~o~ent. He requested the ~oard to apDr0ve the
request,
~r. Riuhard Walton, Vice -President of ~he ~bor Landing
request and would like the project to mov~ forwar~
executed in barony with ~e Arbor Landing co--unity.
requested~e Board reconsider th~ additional ~eat~iction~ of
providing visual buffering along Ironbridge Par~ay ~n an
effo~t to maintain the appearance of the asea and to consider
~9osing a requirement for =he assurance of~at buffering.
wilt be protected through the sn~ivision approval process;
buffering and Iand~caplng w~ ar~a residents; and
the.Board to approve the zoning at this time to allow the
development to proceed.
Mr. M~ale entered into the record-a'let~er fromm. Richard
Waiton addressing the Association's general ~pport of
re,est and requesting additional buffering restrictions.
2/28/96
There was brief discussion relative to ~hs upcoming steps o£
thio zoning request and public input into the process$ the
location of the buffers for the development; and the covenant
requirements with respect to the two Ds foot areas.
Mr. ~cHale seated based on ~he £act that the Arbor Landing
Eemeowners AsSociation i~ generally supportive of ~he
and that they. will have the opportunity to continue to work
with County staff to address the detail~ of the buffers, he
· will support the request.
~I~. McHale then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Barber, for the
Board to approve Case 96SN0148 subject to the following
condition:
The Textual Statement, titled Tract D I~onbri~ge/~JJbor Landing,
da%ed November 1~, 1995, shall be considered the requirements
for development of single family residential
(NOTB: This condition i~ in addition to all applicable
conditions of Cases 86s097, ~7S03§, 885~0061 and 89SN0329,
:~:wbiok remain in effect.)
In ~idlothlan ~aglsterial District, JOH~STON-WILL~
requested ~mendment to Conditional U~ Plahne~ D~velep~snte
(cases s4~109 and 86s083) to p.ernit expansion of
recreational facilities at a permitted health club, plus
building setback and p~rklng exceptions. Tho denoity of such
amendment will be controlled by ~oning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan deoignates the property for
regional ~ixed u~. Thi~ request lies in a Corporate Office
(0-2) Dietrlot on 10.8 acres known as 10800 Center View Drlv~.
Tax Nap 17-5 (1) Parcels 2~ an4 26 (sheet
Nr. Jacobsom presented a oummary'cf Case 9§SN0155 and stated
the Planning commission an~ staff reoommen~ approval subject to
conditions and acceptance of th9 proffers~ condlticns.
further stated the Planning Commission recommends approval of
the rear yard setback re~uction from thirty feet to twenty f%et
and that ~tsff eri~inally had reoo~ended denial oft he parkin~
requirement exception of 73 spac~ out of the r~quired l~.
misted the Planning Cc~mmissicn, -after negotiations
diocuooion,' imposed a cerise of rootricticns,~ therefore,
rccommendin~ approval of the request. ~e briefly reviewed the
restrictions imposed by the co~issien and orated the Plar~ing
Commission recommendo approval ~ubjcct to conditions amd
a~oeptance of one proffered condition.
~ir. Cogbill, representing ~he applicant, stated the
recommendation ie acceptable. There was no opposition present,
Mn. Barber commended everyone for their efforts and stated he
supports the request.
Mr. Barber then made a motion,, seconded by Krs$ Hu/~phrey, for
the Board to approve Case 96SN0155 subject to the following
conditions~
1. The follswin~ conditions notwithstanding, the plan
emtitled Robious S~ort~ & Pitne~m Center Revised
Plan, dated 10/12/95 shall be oonsidere~ the M~ster Plan.
(NOTE: This conditicn~ supersedes Condition i of.
86S0~3 relative to ~ast~r Plan spproval.}
2. Parking shall be pe~miuted on any or all of the property.
3. At the time of site pla~ review, staff .may require
provision of measures to minimize the view of outdoor
recreation~l uses fro~ public rights of way. (P)
4.. The public wastewater system shall be used. (U)
And, further, the Beard accepted the following proffered
cendition:
A seventy (70) parking space exception ~hall be glfanted under
the following circumstances:
A. The proposed 5,000 square foot pymnamlum shall be u~od for
an i~d0or g~n~sium without spxctutor seating and the
existing qknunazium shall be used for a gy]lnasium without
spectator seating, or ~ ~hildren's g~a~i~m ~nd
one-half of ~e existing floor ~pao~ of' the
g~asium).
B. · A mini~ of 60 additional parking spaces shall
C.. ~n conjunction with uitu plan submi==ion for the n~xt
phase of construction a pedestrian access plan s~all be
submitted to and approv~ by the Planning Department.
Thi~ aoce~s plan ~hall be designed to facilitut= ease of
~n Tax MaD 17-6 - (1) -28 and encourage the u~a of
a~eas o~ Tax Map 19~6-(1)-~8 by ~m~Ioy~s, m~er~ and
guests using the facilitie~ on the Property. The approved
pedestrian accem~ zystem =hall be in,tailed wi~=ha
necessi~ate~ the elimination of any ezisting parking
spuC=s, u%ch =liminution ~hull be considered approved
a to,al exoeRtion of seventy-three (73}
D. swim ~eets shall be conducted od the
spaces, up to
exception, ~or
spaces.
No organized
Property.
(NOTES: a)
Tho proffered condition would allow the
property to be developed £sr gymnasiums
without restrietion~ and/er utilized for
organized swim meets or contests if
perking spaces ar~ provided in uccordunce
with Zoning''0=dinance r~q~irammnts for
With the approval of this request,
Condition 1 of Case 845109 (approved
Tek~cual Statement) is amended to
outdoor recreational use on the
~usternmo~t portion of t~e r~que~t
proper~y.
Ail othmr conditions of zoning approval
for Cases 04S109 for the entire property
and 869083 for the westernmost portion of
th~ property r~main in effect,
With the a~proval of this request, a
twenty (20) foot exception te t~n thirty
(30).. foot rear yard building setback
requirement shall b~ grunted along th=
northern boundary of the request property.
96-I54
e)
There is no evidence that staff ever
approved the off-site easement for use of
parking on Tax Map 17-6 (1) Parcel 28. In
conjunction with the next phase of
development~ much an easement must
submitted to, ~nd approved by, the
Planning Department. The easement ~ust
provide for the long-term use of the off-
. site spaces.)
Mr. Barber ~tated he serves on the Board of Managers for the
YMC~ and that ~echnically ~a does not h~v~ bo declare a
conflict of interest under the Virginia Conflict of Interest
Act. Mn further mtsted that in the past he has declared a
conflict ~elatlng to any YMCA ite~, therefore, to be consistent
and to avoid any appearance of conflict, he will declare a
conflict of interest under the Virqinia Conflict of Interemt
Act, and EXCUSed ~imself from the meeting.
In Midlothian Magisterial District, YMe~ O~ ~RF~TER RICHMOND
requested conditional Une to permit indemr/out~oor recreational
and child day care uses .in an Agrlc~ltural (~) District. ~e
density of suoh amen~ent will be controlle~ by zoning
oonditions or ordinance Standard~. The Compr~nsive Plan
designates the property for planned transition a~a. This
re~e~t lles on 24.3 acres fronting approximately 730 feet on
~ east line of Coalfield Road, approximately 2,700 feet
(Sheet 7)..
~s. Musselman presented a sugary cf Case 96$N01~2 a~d ~tated
acceptanc~ of the proffered conditions. She noted ~e
conforms to ~e ~lothlan Ar~s PIan.
~. Cogbill, representin~ t~e applicant, ~%ated the
re~endation is acceptable. There wa~ no uppo~ition present.
On motion of Mr. KcHale, seconded by Mrs. ~umphrey, th~ Board
approved Ca~e 96~N0172 and accepted the followln~ proffered
conditions:
1. Prior to th~ relea~ of ~e certificate of' occupancy for
any faoilities that inoreas~ the n~d for additional
s~nitary ~acilitiu~, . as determined by ~e U~ilities
Department, publio wastewa=er shall ba extended =o the
Property and all existing a~ proposed ~anltm~facilltie~
~hall be connected to the public wast~w~er
Depmr~nt of Forestry for th= p~rpo~ of removing d~ad or
di~a~ed tree~, th~e ~hall be no timbering on the
Property untll a land dlsturban=~ 9~rmit has been obtained
3. 'A fifty (50) 'foot buffer shall be maintained along
southern property boundary. This buffer ~hall confo~to
Sections 21.1-227 and 21.t-228; provided however
clearing', an~ grading shall b~ pe~itt~d within
northern twenty-five (25) feet of the southern property
the requir~ents cf the Ordinance.
11.
(NOTE: This condition would allow reductions Or furthe~
modificetlcns cf the buffers through site plan approval by
the Planning Commission under the criteria outlined in the
~oning ordinanss.)~
A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
western edge of the Virginia Power easement,located along
the eastern proDnrty boundary. This buffer shall conform
to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for buffers,
Sections 21.1-227 and 21.1-228.
~NOTE: This condition would allow reductions or
modifleations of th, buffern through site plan approval by
the Planning commission under the criteria outlined in the
Zoning Ordinance.)
6utdoor playfiei~s, courts, swimming pools and similar
active recreational areas shall be located e minimum of
100 feet'from adjacent properties ts the north, south and
We~t, a minimum of 150 feet from adjacent properties to
the east and a mlnimun Q£ fi£=y (~0) feet from any
existing er proposed public, road. Nothing herein shall
prevent development cf the indoor facilities and/or
parking within the 100 feet s~tback. Within this setback,
existing vegetation shall be supplemented, where
necessary, with landscaping or other devices designed to
achieve the bu/sering ~ndards sontained in Section 21.1-
~s (a) (4) of the Zoning Ordinance. At the time of ~ite
plan review,' ~his setback may De eliminated by' the
Planning Co--lesion if adjacent prop~rti~ have been zoned
or developed for non-residential u~es. In addition, the
setback m~y be re~uce~ by the Planning Co~mlsslcn if the
inoreaaed visual and melee impacts that sports or related
activities have on area residences are
Mitigation may be achieved through the use of topography;
fencing; harming; wall= and/or other devices and
features, as approved by the Planning Commission at the
time of site plan review.
With the exception Of buffers and setbacks.for playfislds,
courts and similar active recreational areas, d~velopment
shall conform to the requirements'of the zoning ordinance
for Corporate Office (0-2) dist~iet in Emerging Growth
Areas.
This C0n~itional Use sha~l be grahted to and for the YMCA
and shall not be transferrable nor run with the lend.
Other than an ontdoor public address system or
for 'the existing pool, ,~here shall not be any outdoor
public address system or speakers. The outdoor public
address system or spankers for the existing pool shall not
be used between the hours 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., ~unday
through Thursday, and 11:00 p.m. and Ss00 a.m.~ Friday and
Saturday.
Direct access to Coalfield Road shall be limited to the
existing entrance/exit, located towards the southern
property line.
Direct acces~ to Woolrldge Road Extended shall be limited
to' one (1) entrance/~xit. Th= exact location of the
access shall be approved by the Transportation Department.
Tbs developer of the Property shall be responsible f,cr the
phasing plan which shall be submitto~ to an~ approved by
the. Transportation Dep~rtment prior to site,plan approval:
96-156
.... ,. ........... L .......... ] ..... L L i
(sTAFF NOTEs:
AYes :
Absent:
construction of edditionaLpavement slong coalfield
right turn la,es. T~e~e improvements shall be
provided prior to tko issuance of an occupancy
permit for development of more than a 5,000 square
foot co~munlty building, outdoor swiping pool and
Relocation of the ditch to prs¥ida an a~eguate
shoulder along the east sid~ of Coalfield Road for
t~e entire property frontage.
construction 6f additional pavement along Woolm~dga
Road Extended at the approved access to prpvlde left
and right turn lanes. These improvements shall De
provided, is warranted, based on Transportation
Dedication to and for the benefit of the County of
chesterfield, ~reu an~ unrestricted, any additional
right-of-way [er easement} required for the
improvement~ identified above.
A. The proffered conditions supersede
conditions of zoning approval (ca~e
955N0184) for existing YMCA facilities
located on the westernmost portion of the
request property. Thss~ conditions are
similar to conditions of toning approval
under which existing facilities were
developed.
With respect to Proffered Condition 6, the
requirements of the ~nderlylng
Agricultural (A) zoning cla~=iflcatlon,
where they exceed the requirements of the
ordinance ~or 0-2 Districts in ~nurglng
Growth A~eas, ~emain applicable for any
development an the request property.)
Mr. Daniel, Mr. Warren,.Mra. Humphrey, and Mr. Morale.
'Mr. Barber returned
to the meeting.
968N0203
In Bermuda Magisterial Dis~riot, ~HE CHEST~RF%$~D
~IN~ C0~IS$ION requested rezoning from Agricultural (A),
Residential -(R-7) and Light Industrial (I-l) ts General
Industrial (I~) with Conditional'Use Planned Development to
permit use end bulk exceptions. 'This density of such
will be controlled by zoning.conditions or Ordinance standards.
moderate industrial and floodplain use. This re,est 1les on
approximately 1,58~ acre~ lo~ated b6twee~ Route 1-295, North
~non Chur~ Road, B~uda ~un~md Road and ~e Jame~ River.
Tax Map 10Q-lQ (1) Part of Paro~l lO; Ta~ Map 100-1] (1)
~arc~l~ ~ t~ough ~ and 7; Ta~ ~p 100-1~ (~) ~arcel= i ~ough
~; Tax M~p 100-16 (1) Par=~l 1; Tax Map 118-8 (1) Parc~l~ I a~
8; Tax Map 118-16 {1) Parcel 7; and Tax Map 119-1 (1} Parcel. 1
and luther, the property owner withdrew Tax Map 199-5
~arceI 1 and part of ~arcel ~, =onta~ninq approximately
~lanning Commission meeting, at ~e re~e=t cf the property
95-15,7
owner of parcel 1 and part of parcel 32 on Tax Map llP-S, the
~pplioation was amended to withdraw that property f~om the
request. She stated the referenced property iS
Agricultural (A} and Residential (R-7) and is comprised of 23.$
acres and that the Board should acknowledge this wlthdrawal
this property from the repueet. She fmrther .stated at the
request of area property owners, the Textual- Statement,
Conditions 7.B. and 7.C. were modlf~ed to delete references
~he neighborhoods south of Bermuda Hundre~ Road and the
Tazawell Avenue neighborhood being zoned fo~ industrial use and
as a r~sult, the condition has be~n modified to refteot those
and rovlowed the propose4 uzss permitted for this regusst, she
~resented a brief slide 'presentation of he.es and housing
developments along Maadowville sn~ North Enos Church Reade near
this development. She stated the two changeg to thi~ request
have no impact on the conditions or requirements as recommended
by the Planning Commission or stpff and noted the
coupled with the Textual Statement~ substantially confer~ to
the Meadowville Plan.
Mr. Theobold, representing the applicant, ~tatad the
represents a pro-active approach by local gov~rr~ent,
acknowledging the vital benefits that planned industrial and
economic development ~an provide for the. good of all
Chesterfield County citizens while still mitigating the impact
of such d~velop~ent on those in proximity to the development.
~e stated the Meado%rville A~ea Plan, adopted h~ the Board of
~upervlsors in 199~, recognized there was an opportunity and a
need for plan~ed and o~d¢rly industrial development to occur in
this area and that the plan acknowledged the proposed request
is m prime area for' Chesterfield County's future, economic
development. He further misted the hallmark of the Plan was to
encourage the creation of an industrial park in a coordinated,
planned fashion while protecting existing residential
neighborhoods from the impact of such development. Ne
=hat this re,vest is highly conditioned and ~ubstsntlally
conforms to the Meadowville A~ea Plan and that the applicant
has pursued this application with conditional use planned
development in an effort to enhance the overall request, He
further stated that the antielpsted economic impact of this
request can translate,leto approximately $9 million of annual
real estate and personal property taxes and will create over
13,~00 new job opportunities in the County. He £u~ther
economic development pays its own way. He requested the Board
consider that bulk exceptions ara solely for the purpose of
promoting an integrated site plan, no less beneficial to the
residents o~ occupants Qf ~u~h development, as well
nclghboring properties than obtained under the regular bulk
regulations of the zoning o~dinanc~ for b~ildings developed on
separate zoain~ lot. He stated two mass meetings have been
held regarding this.request and the applicant has met with
numerous landowners in the area. He further ~ta~ed the
applicant' ba~ sincerely approached this request in an attempt
to balance the impact on area nsighborheode and requested the
Board to approve the request.
Mr. George Beadles stated he feels approval of 'the request
would he a positive impact to the County.
Mr. John Coghill~ immediate past President of the Chesterfield
~uelness Council, stated he is representing the Council who
supports the requset. Ha further ~ta~ed he realm thi~
reprementm a pro-active approach by the County and
the citizmns in the area. ~m stated that change is always
scary and that in order £0r the County to be able to provide
funds to maintain the same benefits and services to,citizens it
needs to find new sources of incomm, He further stated that he
teals approval of the request would be beneficial to all County
96-158
............. I. .......... L_ , _1 ........................ .1 I ..... I
citizens and requested the Board to approvo this request and to
continue addressing area~ throughout theConnty in an effort to
~rovide the same type of resources available for businesses in
the future.
Mr. Jim Daniels, representing the Central Chesterfield Business
Association and Citizens for Responsible Government, stated
~ot~ o~ ~e organizations ~0ard of D~rectors have unanimously
endorsed this project; that they feel it is a great way towards
Chestersield achieving'the Yo/$o tax ratio; and commended the
Co~/~ty's efforts at proaotiv~ eeonemie d®velop~ent.
/~r. Vaughn Edmond~, representing Enos B~pti~t Church, ata~ed
development. He expressed uonc~rns about additional traffic
~r~ Road would drastically decrease the parki~ mpace for
~urch me.ers. He e~ressed concerns r~lative to the
request i~ approved and that approval of t~e request will limit
expansion of .the Church in th~ future. H% stated that
additional traffic in ~e ~rea would further disrupt churoh
services; that ~e Ch~ch does not oppose projects in the area,
however, he feetm an indu~trlal park in this area would
detrimental to the Church; a~d requested the Board to give
proper con&ideratio~ of th~ historical sitm OS this ch~ch wh~
considering the
~. David Garrett, a r~nid~nt of North ~n Church Road,
area and requested the Board to tak~ top consideration for ~e
safety of, area residents if the road i5 developed. He stated
those citizen~ who hav~ well~ in the area and fbr pr6te~tion to
b~ ~iv~n of property valum~ in the area.
An~ociation, expressed concerns about the reqUeSt,
as it relates to tr=nsportation issues. He stated that i~ the
request is approved, residents of Mount Blanco would like the
present or relocated Mmado~ille Road access ta be degig~ed
a way to allow ~or an upscala, aesthetic entrance that would
u~e plan and provide a pleasant view through the indus~ial
development for t~e present and fusee hone investors in ~e
area. ae ~ur~er stated that residents also want the ~orth
Enos C~urc~ Road access Dy the Industrial Park constructed
close to Route 10 a~ possible, with one major cro~ing point,
projected indus=rial space allowed on Meado~ille Road and
stated the residents do not oppose the industrial
improvements in ~he area. He stated citizen~ should be able
add.ess their views during the ~ianning stage of the project
Mrs+ H~mphrey returned to the meeting.
Mr. Mat~ews requested that ~e Board instruct County staff to
notify the arms Association of the engineering company's name
and provide them wi~ information when road plan~ are
their concerns d~ing ~e planning proc~ in an ~ffort
ensure the plan is fully d~velop~d to everyonez
does not f~al this development wili'be a positive impact
96-159
stated she feels additional time is needed to address the
economic and emotional n~eds cf this project and that ~he fee~s
the community neod~ additional information abQut the project.
concerns relative .to the manner in which the Meadowwille
Technology Park is being crea~ed,'specifically, as it relates
to the lack Of info.atica given to aiea residents regarding
thA request. She further stated many area residents do net
want an industrial park and additional traffic in ~he area.
area residents in an effort to reduce health and '~afety
dev~lo~tment or tho creation of jobs~ indicated that he feels
this request i~ speculative building, and expressed hi~
o~positios to that type of development. Ks further stated he
is oppemed to people getting something for nothing and
taxpayers ~aylng for speculated ventures in an effort to
artlcles in the Richmond Times Dispatch Newspaper relating to
~ember of the aeadowville co~ittee,, state~ 'over 116 area
residents attended th~ Planning Co~ission meeting regarding
this request, with 16 speakers. ~a expressed appreciation to
nsgst~aticn~ cf thi~ request. He expressed concerns relative to
allowing the development of this project and be rezoned in fast
the planning of this rezening, but w~re turned down; t~at
transportation i~ a very ~riou~ is~u~ for this typo of
traffic in the area if th~ r~quent i~ approved amd to the
quality and quantity of ~rsnnd water for re~idents ~ho still
u~e wells in %he area. ~e stated he feels it is eseenti&l t. hat
the County protect the existing neighborhoodz along Taz~well
Avenue, Bermuda Hundred Road, and Psrkinssn ~eights with
buff~s and with other condition~ that ~e~e nagotiat=d by
Cunningham. ~e further ~tated residents are concerned about
notified if the road will he realigned to allow them to provide
i~p~t into the p~blio proce~; and that the residents are
G~lley, Plan~ing Co~misSioner, about the plan setting aside
percen~ of the land for open spaces and staged at least 20
percent of the land should remain open space. He stated the
community is not a~ainst industr~al development, but only want
to en~ure thi~ development i~ carefully planned, upscale,
with ~he area
Mr. Ruben Waller staged he hopes the County will not limit the
funding to ~aintain the currant de~igu aativities at the
Waltha11 Interchange because of this proposed request; that he
~upport~ the overall cc~cept of the request; and requested that
the phrase "the developer" bm deleted from Textual Statement ~n
paragraph 18 or be added to paragraphs 17 and 20 in the Textual
Ztatament.
96--160
Fir. Theobold stated tke request has been fashioned to
consistent with ~e Meado~v~lle Area Plan with ~he additional
goals of providing flexibility and development in protecting
the urea neighbOrhOOdS from the development. He further s~ated
that development is the next step in comprehensively rezoning
a significant tract of land that will further enhance economic
davelupment in thu county and provide many job opportunities.
Mr. Daniel. stated he is ampluyed by Philip Morris; t~hat'Park
5~0 is currently zoned amd served by public utilities; and that
there ia nc reasonable impact te his employes by this request,
will participate in the decision of the request. He further
~tat~d d~velopmmnt of thi~ site is important tO the future to
eD_hence the County's regional ~ommitmente to providing sites
for economic development. ~ stated that zoning is only the
first ste9 in the process; that many issue~ and concerns will
be addressed later in the process; and that the County hum
never put funds into a znnin~ case, however, when the
h~ eom~ forward with a project, there has been initial,
upfront assistance~ but only after a careful financial analysis
that shows ali the funds ~ave b~en recovered within a period of
threm years. Ke further stated th'at there ia no ~nvestmant
from th~ ~to~kmarkst, the banks, or anywhere that will
.guarantee a three year peyback; and the County will not mak~
any investments that do not generat~ a three y~ar payback from
th~ economic developRe~f opportunity. He further stated he
will support the project and expressed appreciation to ovuryone
for th=ir input and to stuff for their efforts into this
project. He furtker stated as the County continues to move
forward, th~r~ will be more zoning of mites for economic
development.
Fisher, President of the C~ntral Chest~rfield
Association, expressing his support of the r~uest and a letter
fro~ the New Bermuda's District Association, expressing the
Asaociatlon's concern about a~eq~a~e ~u~£~ring ~or residen~e in
Mount Blanoo' Sub, iv%sion if the request 'is approved.
expressed appreciation for everycnes input ~n~ £or~e
of County staff, particularly Ms. Mussulman, in working on thi~
request. Ee stated that he had'requested staff to go through
how the proposed zoning ia in conformance with the Meadowville
Area Plan, and that, with the exception of the access near
HumBer Division Plant, he fuels it is fair to Say t~e request
is in eonzormance wi~ t~9 Plan.
of the road network, the property owners will need to develop
a masts= plan fu~ the area, housv~=, if they do not develop a
plan, County staff will ensure the location of the road netwon~
before the first site plan is approved. He further stated
development cf the road network is a public process and that he
cannot foresee any public road network taking place without
public input and involvement in the process.
Mr. MoHale requested staff to get the ~ames~ add~e~se~ and
phone numbers of the .designated representatives of the Mount
Blanco Civic Association and any other area citizens who WiSh
to be notified of any public presses regarding this
When asked about the County's investment in the project, Mm.
MeCraoken ~tated the Co~ty hum not made an~ commitments of who
will Day for any of =he roads and that the County will follow
ibm nel~mal p~ocems in developing the roads for this project.
Discussions. oo~ments, and questions ensued relative to the
eximting right-of-way in ~he area of t~he ch~oh wit~
suggestions that efforts be made to ~non Baptist to minimize
the impacts to the Church when improvements are made ~o Enon
Church Road.
F~r. ~c~ale.requested staff to addre~ th~ c~r~nt right-of-way
mituatlonm wi~ representatives of the ~ to help
dnRerstand the current situation and risks and how thmy can
involved-in the future pr0~e~s of this project.
Discussion, co--cuts, and ~estions ensued relative to
~an~ar~ tha~ will be a~lie~ to %h~ d~velop~en~ o~
than in %he past ~or this tyDe of ~eveloDment; and development
standards for ~is request being equal to or ~eater than the
s~andards ~at a~ply to Rivers Bend Industrial Park.
When asked, Ms. ~ss~lman stated thst when som~one ~mlts a
site plan on any portion of this property, signs will be
on that prop~r~y notifying ~he n~ighborhood ~m~ a plan
pending and ~at si~s will alto be placed in lo=ation~
She'further stated in addition to providing that not~flcat~on,
receive written notification from ~he Count~ of ~e
~. ~caal~ r~t~d .~taff to include in their lis~
netified, in writing, in addition to any 6ther ordinance
~equired notificati0nm.
~en asked, Mr. Steamier stated the County will co--it any
paid by County r~$id~nt~ and how buminemses help balance the
County'~ budget. ~e further stated if the County doe~ not have
~o~h of tbs co~ercial tax bass, the County would likely have
a Sh0~fallthat would gr0~h ca. year into the fuCur=, unl~
~n a~d, Dr. Netm0n m~ated tha~ in th~ sit~ plan proce~s~ he
is unsure of anything that would give citizens a~arantee that
their well would not go dryf except for conducting a water
tabl~ ~tudy. ~e f~ther ~tat~d that aS1 hom~m in the area that
ar= using wells have public water adjacent to their prope~y.
He state~ that the l~v~l of mafety to,ay for well~ is very high
a~d that if ~omethinq happened to a well in the area, the~e
woul~ ~till De public water aQces~ in clu~ proximity.
Mr. MoHale stated that going fo~ar~ with thm applied=ion for
this zoning would be keeping the County's co~itments with
resDect to ~e Meado~ille ~ea Plan; ~at the county
looking for inves~ents in this area; that a River= Bend fire
~a% education investments are currently being made in
area. ~e further ~ta~ed he feels the request, as modified
mtaff, is in substantial accord with Meado~ille Area Plan;
~at there will be substantial public inbut into the
transpo~ation and plan development process; that the project
w~ll be 4evelcpment a=cordln~ to rigorous Count~stan~ar~s; and
~at he will MUpport the re.est as modified by staff and will
96--162
........ I L J ....... 2 I, I
Mr. Warren stated he feeiu area oitizens have represented
themselves well and'Mr. Nc/{ale has ~esponded to their concerns.
He further ~tatedthut he is now more comfortable that citizens
will have ample opportunity for input and public involvement in
the proqe~S,
~r~ McHale them muds u motion, seconded by F,/'. Daniel~ for the
Board to. approve Casa 965N020~ subject to the following
oondition and, acknowledged the withdrawal of 23.7 acres on part
The plan entitled Meadowville Teuhnology Park, dated
January 1996, and the Textual Statement~ dated Z/8/96 and
revi~ed ,2/2Q/96 and 2/28/96, ~hall he censi~ere~ the
~aster Plan.
Tho Boar~ of ~up~rv~or~ dire=ted the Transportation
and Planning Departments to provide written notice
of road plan and site plan nu~ittals related to th~
development of .the ~ubject property to anyone who
provides their name and address %0 the Departm~ntm.
On motion Of Mr, Barber, seconded by M~. MoHale, the Board
adjourned a= 1I:45 ~.m. until ~arch 5, 1~96 ate:00 p.m., in
Room 50l of thm Administration B~ilding, fo~ the Board of
Supervi~or~ Budg~ Work Session..
vote: Unanimous
Lane