04-10-96 MinutesMr. ~arry G. Daniel, chairman
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Uioe chrm.
Mrs. Renny B. HuMphrey
~tr. Lane ~. Ramsay
County Adminietrator
u%ilitiae
Mr. N. ~. Carmioha~l,
Commissioner of Revenue
Mn. Sana Carter, Dir.,
Youth Services
Mr. Richard Cordle,
Ms. Maryanne Curtin,
Budget & Management
Intergovern. Affairs
chief Robot= L. ~anes, Jr.,
Mr. Miohaet =olden, Dir.,
Mr. Russell Harris,
County Ombudsman
Mr. Thomes ~. Jaoobson,
Dir., ~tanning
Di~., A~eounting
Dcpaty CO. Admin.~
Dir., Transportation
Dir., Env. Engineering
County Attorney
Mr. Francis N. Pirate, Dir.,
Police Depar~men~
Ri~k Manager
~lr. James J. L. St~9~aier,
Dir., Budget & Management
~ir. Z. ~. Stith, Jr.,
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Community Development
Dir., Libraries
~r. Frederick Willis,
Mr. Daniel callgd th~ regularly scheduled m~eting to order ut
~:o0 p.m.
4/~0/96
On motion of Mr. Mc/~ala, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
vote: Unanimous
~r. Daniel recognized The Honorable $ohn ~arnerf who
present at the ~eeting, and stated senator Warner has served
the ~tate of Virginia with dignity. Ha than introduced $~nator
Senator Warner stated he i5 e~rrently serving as Chairman of
the Subcommittee of Environment and publi~ Work~ which handles
all federal highway funds. He further stated the committee
will reauthorize ISTEA, whic/% is the threshold piece of
legislation, in terms of all federal participation, nalnly in
ths highway systems, and that he is aware o~ needed
improvements to Route 288. He recognized Delegate John
watkins, who was pressnt at =hs meeting, and stated Delegate
Watkins frequently addresses the importance of improving
roadway. He loft_her stated he ~eels improv~m~nt~ to Route
will facilitate greaten: high tec/% growth from th~ Tidewater
region up through northern Virginia. He ~tatad northern
Virginia is currently ek~erienoing the second highest rate of
growth in high tach -- competing with california. ~e further
stated it is important that the Richmond area be qiv~ the
tran~porta=ion facilities, and ~u=h other as=is~anee that the
federal government may provide, to allow this area be just as
competitive as other regions in th~ State. He oen~ra~ulated
the County on receiving the U.S. ~enate Productivity and
Quality Award Medallion. He stated Congress curr~n=ly has
e0~oept of r~dir~cting America to allow for more tax dollars
and more decision making to be handled at the local level.
It was the general cen~ensus of the Board to recess for five
minutes.
Z. ~OUNTY ADKI~IS~RATOR~S COHMENT~
Mr. Ramsay referenced a letter from Reverend Bill Soother,
Pastor of Southslde Baptist Church, expressing his appreciation
to the Board for the re~olution and recognition given to the
Chesterfield ~olice Chaplains at %he Board meeting on H~rch~7,
1996. ~e then ~n=roduced Mr. St~th to introduce a new County
smployee.
5~r. $tith introduced Mr. Thomas Taylor, the new Director of the
Community Development ~losk Gr~nt ~ivision, and briefly
Outlined his education a~d ~xperi~mce.
Mr. Taylor expressed appreciation fo~ the 0pport~mity to ~rve
Chesterfield and stated he is looking forward ~o working at
Chesterfield County.
~. EOA~D CO~ITTEE REPORTS
There were no Board C=mmlttee Reports a~ this time.
96-226
4. R~0UR~TS TO ~OSTPONE ACT~ONr ADDITIONBt OR
OHA~GES IN T~E ORDER OF ~RESENTATION
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
Deleted Item 7.C.l.0., Adoption of ReSOi~tio~ Designuting
Gregory's Charter sections A, B, and C and Fa11ing creek Farms
Sections F and G us Bird Sunctuuries and, adopted the ugenda,
aa amended.
0 RE~OL~TION REO.O~NI~INCTHE ~TE_K~R~ERT..N. EVANS, JR. FOR
CKESTERFIELD CO~TY
Mr. Bryant stated ~. Evans put forth a lot of eff0~ and
enthusiasm into hi~ job and that customer aervice wa~ h~ top
pre,eat to receive the remolution~ on b~alf of her late
hussar, ~r. Herb~ W. ~vans,
~=AS, ~r. ~ans be~an his 9u~liu service with ~h~
cowry in ~967 a~ an Operato~ Traine~ at Falling C~eek Wate~
Plan% =nd~ ~hrough a ~ries of 9romo~ion~, ~came County
Bmcteriologist in 1973 and eatablished ~e County's
p~rfect rating Certified by the State; and
~tabli$~$~ ~est~rfield County ~s ~ le~der in the w~t~r supply
field~ and
promoting =he County and the Utilities Department and his
aotiv~ participation in prof~iona~ organisation~ that
~ene~ated state-wide reoo~ition o~ =he ~ali~y of ~h~ County's
Virginia Sec:ion and n~erous oo~ittees; receiving the
pr~tiq~ous George W. Fuller Award in 1984 for distinguished
~rvlc~ ~n the water supply field; and bein~ voted operator of
the Year by the Virginia Section in ~978; and
~R~, ~- ~van~ ~erved a~ a frequent instructor at the
State =erttfio~tion in water plant operations; instructed
~imilar olasse~ at various oo~uni%y oollega~ in th~ Richmon~
area; and frequently ~pok~ ~ Civic ~ssociation~ and co--unity
~ER~S, Mr. Evans implemented n water ~al~ty
~afe drinking water for the citizens of Ch~at~rfiald County;
WHEREAS, Hr. Evans provided the highest level of customer
service by working directly wit/% customers to address their
concerns and spending extra time with the customers to reassure
them of the high quality of drinking water provided by the
County.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the chesterfield
County Board o~ Supervisors publicly recognizes the
contributions of Fir. 5erbert W. Evans, Jr. and ex~en4s, on
behalf oS its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County,
their appreciation for h~ exceptional service to the County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDt that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Hrs. Brenda Evans, Mr. Evans' wife,
smd that this resolution be pn~manently recorded among %he
papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Mr. Daniel acknowledged Mr. Ev~m~' out~tanding dedication to
customer service and then requested Mr. Bryant and Mr. Ramsay
to present the resolution to ~Lrs. Evans.
Mr. Ramsay and Mr. Bryant presented the e~ecuted remolution to
Hrs. Zvans, aocom~anledhyher daughter. Mr. Ramsay s~a~edM~.
Evans set the example for customer ~ervice und that he had a
great love for Ckas%erfiel~ County. ~o ~xprea~ed ~y~pathy, on
behalf of the County, on the lose of her husband.
Mrs. ~vans ~tated ~he wm~ very proud of her husband, expressed
appreciation for the recognition, and stated her husband
enjoyed %he challenges of hi~ job while w0rkiDg for the County.
6. WORK SESSIONS
6.A. FY97 PROPOSED BUDGET
Mr. Stegmaier stated this time has been scheduled to conduct a
have been mad~ at the State level to the local Bus/ness and
Professional Occupational License (EPOL) leglslatien in WhiCh
the County will have to accommodate this year in its local
er~inanses including imposing a~hresheld of $10~,0095 allowing
an upplication fee, up to $10~, for any busin=su;
maximum ra~es r~main in place; an~ moving many businesse~ from
the "professional" category to "personal services" category,
reduuing their rate from $0.5B/$100 5e $0.36/100 and noted
State legislation will exempt many payers currently li~ted us
wholesalers from %he rate due %e ~'sltus" of inventories.
then reviewed the F¥97 pro~o~ed BPOL ~ates in Chesterfield,
Henrlco, and Riu~mend; the F~97 ~POL proposal; and a lls~ of
as compared to the proposed program, au noted the majority of
County businesses gross less then $100,009 per year and that
the maj0rityo~ County taxpayers and small businesses will have
a decrease in the amount of their BPOL liability. He ~eviewed
the current BPOL fee amount as compared to the proposed BPOL
foe £o~ veriouu categories und le~els of gross re=eipts. He
taypuyers in the $100,000+ category and noted their tax amount
WO~l~ n0~ change, hut they will be ~ayimg thm flat lmm cn
cf their current tax, therefore, seeing a slight increase.
stated utaff recommends that ~hm Board set thm date of Junm 12,
~996 for a public hearing date to consider modifying the BPOL
ordlnanue.
4/~0t96
96-228
Discussion, comments, and questions ensued relative to examples
cf businesses obtaining $100~¢00 in gross receipts; the reaaon
bu~inemmem in the $100,000 category will have an increase in
their BPOL rate; under State Code, businesses grossing under
$100,000 ~annot be taxed, but businesses over $100,000 have to
pay a tax on all receipts including the first $100,000; the
thrust of the BPOL change being towards s~all, rather than
large, businesses; and tho net i~paot to the County from
changes in the Coda and the new fee structure being
approxlmmtsly $$00,000 and the impact being an additional
$509,000 (approximate) if the $100 fee for businesses in the
$100,000 cmtegory i~ not applled.
~r. Steg~ai~r then reviewed the Tax Abatement
parameters for rehabilitation of aging residential property end
stated the abatements would be available te any property
twenty-five years or older, however, if property deviation is
ten perce~t ~ore, th~ abatenent~ would apply for fifteen years
Or older,
es=ablished for the tax abatement; whether property awners who
are experiencing structural damage from ehrin~ swell soil
benefit from this Progra~ if their properties are improved; and
State Code requiring that homes be at least 15. years o1~ in
order to qualify for the ~rogram.
Program age requirement be addressed, given the unique
circumstances of shrink swell soil in chesterfield, as
Board develo~ it~ legislative package for next year.
Mr. Ramsey stated Mr. Barber's request will be addressed.
Mr. Stegmaier continued to review the Tax Abatement Program
parameters inaludlng no limits on r~sidantial square footage
for new space and a thirty percent increase for ~quare footage
new space in multi-family structures; proposing a fifteen
p~rce~t increase in assessed value in o~der to qualify;
proposing a $50 charge to enter the Program; proposing a five
year s~et provision on the ordinance to allo~ for an
evalua=ion and conaidera~ion uS t~e impact at the five year
period; and proposing a 100 percent abatement on improvements
for eight years.
~ke Tax Abatement Program, but consisting of the same concept,
that allows the Board to deal withsome of'the homes in other
par~s of tho County that may not be a~ old, but 'have a loss in
Mr. Daniel stated once ~he State givam the Board the ability to
focua on proportiee less than fiftean years old, the Board will
follow the process with diligence as it has with today'm
recommendation.
When asked, Mr. Micas' abated the Genera! Assembly adopted a
public purpose statute, several yeats age, which allows the
Board to provide relief for h~mas damago~ by shrink swell soil.
~a f~rther stated although the Board cannot technically do a
tax abatement program, the Board could structure some type of
relief program, separate from the Tax Abatement Pre,ram, for
shrink swell homes which could have a slmilar.dolla~ impact.
Mr. stepmaier oontinued to review parameters of the tax
Abatement PrOgram ~ncludlng the exemption being with the
property, not the owner. Ee stated staff recommends the
sat the data of Juno l~, ~996 for a public haarlng data to
consider the Tax Abatement' Program for Rehabilitation of Aging
4/1O/96
96-229
Residential Property. He meted due to the process that must be
followed, no abatements will probably be glvan until the year
1998-
Mr. McEale stated at the Budget and Audit Committee meetin~
today, it was ex-pressed that the Program is the most
progressive of its type in the State of Virginia and that he
feels the Program i~ an important ~tep for Chesterfield County.
Hs further stated he fsol~ it is an early step for sustaining
the County's tax base and ~uetafn~ng the investment that the
citizens have in their property.
When asked, Mr. Micas stated the Board would have to hold a
regarding development of another type program to assist
homeowners with shrink swell soil.
When amk~d, ~r. Ram~y stated staff would present the Board
with a proposal at the April 24, 1996 ~oard meeting raga=ding
Mr. B~rber~s recommendation.
Mr. ~tegmaier stated that because the program would not be
tax ordinance, the proposal could bo brought to the Board of
Supervisors i~ ~ay and th~ public hearing could ~till be held
Juno 12~ 1996.
Mr. Daniel clarified t~at the Board will move forward on
setting a public hearing date on the Tax Abatement Program and
staff will bring back a proposal to the Board that reflects all
dwellings less than fifteen years old, to allow the Board to
assist homes with shrink swell soil damage.
Mr. ste~maier then reviewed t~e Co,unity En/~anoemenf Program
and stated the Program will work in partnership with
neiphborhoods and small businasu to enhance e0m~ity based
or~aniza=ion~ a~ will promote citizen, business, and property
owner initiated solutions to community concerns. He rcviewud
goale o~ tho Program including ~mpow=ring oomm~ities to e~eate
a vision e~hat emphasizes co--unity welln~ and self-
su~i=imnay; devmlcpln~ neighborhoo~ and business Iea~ershlp,
fostering community spirit and pride, as well as a commitment
to d~re for the future, and promoting private partnerships to
activities eligibl~ for funding of Community Enhancement
Progra~ grant~ and activities not ~ligible for funding.
There was brief discussion relative to tho ~ifferen~e in the
Community Enhancement Program and Trlree Cent Road funding and
that staff will suk~it a proposal regarding implementation,
application, and guidolinea, etc. of the Community Enhancement
Program to the Board Drier to July 1, 199~.
Mr. Ste~aler then reviewed the proposed FY97 budget for the
Community Enhanoe~mont Program including $50,000 being
distributed equally to each Magisterial DJ=trier; fifty percent
of a Co~u~ity Pla~ner'~ wor~ schedule b~i~g
primarily to facilltating community organization improvement;
and a portion of the Budget a~d ~a~age~e~t
Strategic Planning Analyst'= time being ~pent a=slsting the
Co~muni=y Pla~ner a~d coordinating the finanolal
Program. He noted details regarding the Program'=
i~plem~mtation will be prison=ed to the Soard prior to July 1,
1~96.
Mr. ~t~9~ai~r referenced responses to a llst of item~ from the
Board of supervisors Retrmat and responses to questions that
came up at the Budget public hearing and Budget work sessions.
When askmd, ~4r. Stegmaier stated at the last Board of
auperviaors/$ohool Board Liaison meetinp, it was agreed that it
4/10/96
96-Z30
would he appropriate to walt un~il after the School Beard's
public hearing on Aprll 19 to decide on the timing of the next
joint meeting, which will be held before the Board of
Supervi~or~ meeting of May 8. He briefly reviewed soI~muni~y
oontrauts/oomtrihutlons llst for FY97 and then reviewed
requests that were not funded in the recommended budget, but in
wh{eh interest was experienced by Board members and the County
Administrator, including funding for tho Court Appointed
special Advocate (CASA} Program and funding for the Domestic
Violence Intervention Projeot. He noted the CASA Prsgra~ aBd
the Domestic Viclsnce Project have been included on the
recommended changes to the F¥97 proposed Budget and noted the
net total of all staff adjustments allows an additional
$234,7Q0 to he allocated bo other need~. E~ then reviewed
Beard of supervlsers recommended ohanges ts the F¥97 proposed
Budget and Board udjustments. ~e stated with the $234,?00 to
allocate from staff revisions, the total is $1,282,900 in
requests. He further stated in meetisg with the Budget and
Audit Committee, a proposal wes developed to address the
unfunded items and then reviewed the proposal which
that net fundin~ be included for sumner Teen Prep~ams~ curbside
recycling, police ~rants, the CASA Program, and the
violence Intervention Project. He stated it was
that funding for library books, environmental books, fire
defibrillator, police replacement vehicles~ tax reduction, a
Public Safety Career buvolopment ~rogram, be held p~ing
final determination on the availability of future revenues.
Whun amked, he stated the Sum~er Teen Programs include the
areas of Bra~deEmill, Ettrick, Sreenfield, and ~eadowbrook.
There was brief discussion relative ts detailed cost
fo~ each of the ~ummer Teen Program~; the ourbside recycling
including all homes in Wocdlake; the defibrillator being a very
high priority; the end of Su~er ~eing t~e approximate time of
knowing the availability of ~urplus fund~; and funding for
library books being allocated among all =ounty libraries as
necessary.
Nr. McHalc clarified that any items beiug held will be
addressed, at the £irs% opportunity~ from FY96 carryovers and
us the Board gets in to the ex,cation of the 1997 budget y~ar,
i% will have anobher opportunity to identify changes in the
County's revenue that will allow the Beard to address any of
the pending items ~hat do net get addressed in the FY97 adopted
Budget. ~e stated hie intent of th~ ta~ redu~tiom item was to
nonsider something a~ a down payment on the beginning efa
resldentiml tax reduction process for tAis year and for the
county A~mini~trater to brin~ back propossls to the Beard
continuing this proce~= in futur~ budget
Mr. Daniel ~tated he f~ls between the good eoonemi¢ health
tha~ t~e County continues to have and the final audit, he feels
comfortable ~hat the pending revenue items wall h~ funded
du~ing the yeer. He further stated when the Bea~d discusses
the item on the agenda for the Budget, ih will be te approve
the Budget as pre~ented, in addition te the addbacks llsted,
and that staff will make miner adjustments necessary to balance
t~e Budget. He commended County and School Board
Administration staff for %heir efforts during the Budget'
process and for addressing all n~cessary budget
(It is noted a copy of the presentations is filed with the
F~T. Daniel requeeted the Board ~o amend the agenda to proceed
with all the New Business Budget Items, except for Item
To Consider Adoption of the Proposed FY97-2001 Capital
Improvement Program at th~s t~me, and to then deal with the
WOrk session and adoption at t_he CIP at th= same
7, N~w BUSINESS
7,A. BUDOE~ ITENE
7.A.1. 50 CONSIDER ~W ORDINANCE TO ANRN~ THE CODE DP THE
COUNTY OF C~ESTERFIELD 1978~ AS AME~DED~ BY
AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION ~L.L-280 RE~%TIN~
~r. ~tith ~tat~ the ~ar4 h~ld ~ ~ubli~ hearin~ on ~ar~ 27,
1996 regarding adoption of an ordinance relating to mite plan
fees.
0n motion of ~r. ~cHale, seconded by Mr. ~a~ber, the Board
~ O~IN~CE TO ~END THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
Q~..CHESTERFIELD, 197~, AS ~NDED, BY ~NDING
~D REENACTING SECTION 21.1-280 RE~TING TO
SITE P~ Y~S
County:
(1) That Section ~1.1-280 of the Cod~ of the County of
read as fellows:
Sec. 21.1-280.
In addition to any other fees re,ired by ~e county, fees
sh~ll b~ payable to the county treasurer and submitted to th~
pla~ng d~partm~nt upon filing a~ follOwn:
(a) Site plan:
o o o
[3) Adjus~men~ to approved site plan, per submittal or
resu~ittal .... 250.00
(4) NO business looated withi~ an Enturpriuu Zone
by =he Co~onweal=h o~ virginia shall be required =o pay any of
t~e fee~ deso~ibed in ~ubsaCtion~ (a)(1) through (a)(3)
This exemption ~hall e~ire on DeoemD~ 31, 2014.
o o o
(2) That this ordinance shall become exfective
Upon adoption.
Vote: Ununimous
7.~..2. TO CONSIDER ~N OI%DINANCE TO ~,{~,~D.T}~ HODS OF THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978 ~S ~ME~DBD, ~Y
AEDRSENACTIN~ S~CTION 20-23 R8LATI~ TO EFFEOTIVE DATE
~ ~ERVICE C~GE; ~ECTION 20-~7 ~L~TiNG TO
~ 8ECTION~ 20-91f 20-9~r ~ 2~-10~
TO ~ISC~GE~ OF 8~ONG WASTE8
~. sti~ stated th~ Board held a public hearing on March 27,
1996 regarding a~o~tion of an ordinance relating to =ffuc%ive
disuharges of strong
On motion of ~s. ~umphrmy, seconded by ~, MoHal~, the Beard
ado~t%d the following ordinance:
~ O~INANCE TO ~D THE COD~ O~ T~
OF ~ESTERFIELD, 1978~ AS ~D~D~ ~Y ~ING
~D ~ENACTING S~CTION ~0~3 R~TI~G TO
~FF=CTIV~ DAT= O~ S~VICZ C~GE; SECTION 20-37
RE~TING T0 ~AT~ ~T~; S~CTtOW ~0-69 RE~TING TO
WAST~AT~ C~RG~$; A~ S=CTIONS 2Q-91~ 20-95 ~D 20-106
(1) The% Seotions 20-23, 20-37, 20-69, 20-91, ~-95 und
~-106 of thu Code o~the County of Chesterfield.
(1) Monthly service c~arg~s~ The monthly service charges
shull be us follows:
Commodity costs charge: $1%09 per h~dred cubic
f~t
Ail consumers ~hall pay.all applicable charges a~
(1) Monthly service charges: ~ monthly s~vice charges
~hall be as follows:
f=et (cc~).
4/10/96
Strong Waste Yon domestic w~ste having a DOD or
suspended solids concentration in excess of two hundred fifty
(250) parts per million.
Solid~
(a) ~o industrial uuer shall disohu~= Wastes ~avi~g a
BOQ or suspende~ solids ~oncentration in excess of
two hundred fifty (~50) part~ p.r million, defined
as industrial waetes sr str~ng waeteabyeecti~n 2~
91, into the sanitary sewer system without having
discharge ~s provided in section ~-9~.
(b) Discharge of wastes having a BeD or suspended solids
concentration in excess of two hundred fifty
parts p~r ~illio~ ~y b~ permitted by th~ director
of utilities after review and approval Wastewater
discharges of this nmt~re ~ha11 be deemed ~trong
wastes and shall be ~ubjeof to strong waste
~urcharge fees as defined in 20-106.
(si ~o industrial user shall discharge wastes having
total mass quantities of BOD or Suspended Solids
that would substantially coneume treatment plant
capacity andfo~ its designed oaDability related to
hydraulics, organic loadlng, or nutrient removal.
Proposed discharges of this nutur= would
eva~ated o~ a ca~e by ~ase basis, with
levels of r~quired pretreotment determined by
director of utilities in ac¢ordan¢= with 2Q-~.
Sss. 20-106. Cost Recovery for treatment of industr{~l wastes.
In addition ts the charges provided for in section
~0-69, a e%r~ng wa~o ~urc.harge for %h~ higher oo~t
of treating excessive strength waste or pollutants
eha~l be rendered to ~ny industrial user discharging
the following formula:
DOD Surcharge - (DOD-250) {62.4xV)
1,000,000
SS Surcharge
1,000,000
BeD = ~io~he~ioal oxygen demand in
parts per mill~on of the
SS = ~uspended solids in parts per
million of the induaT-~ial waste
or strong waste.
V -- Volu~e of the industrial waste
or strong waste in o~bi¢ feet,
(2) Thu~ this ordinance shall become effective
immediately ripen adoption.
9~-234
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD. 1978, AS ~MENDED. ~¥
FOR R~I~ OF EaOBION ~D SaPIeNT CONSOL P.~
~. Stlth ~tate~ the ~oa~d held a ~ub~ic h~aring on Mar~h
1996 r~ar~ing adoption o~ an ordinance relatln~
charged for review of erosion and zedimant ~o~tDol plans.
On motion of Mr. Barber, ~e=on~ed by ~r. McCall, the Beard
adopted the foll0wt~g ordinunue:
~ O~IN~CE TO ~END ~E CODE OF T~E CO~TY
O~ C~=ST~FIELD, 197S, AS ~ZNDED, BY
~D ~ENACTING SB~ION 7.2-9 RE~TING TO FEES C~GED FOR
R~i~W OF ~OSION ~D SEDIMENT CONTROL
BE IT O~AINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfleld
county:
(1) That Section 7.2-9 of the Cod~ of the County of
read as follows:
{a) A program administration fee of one hunted dollarg
($100.00) =hall be 9ai~ to the county at ~he time of filing
each ~osion and sediment control plan for reviuw in
~:h ~turb~d land areas for ~ses, other than single-family
residences, which are le=~ ~an t~n thousand (%0,000) $quar~
f~e% in size. T~e program administrative fee for ~ingle-family
ronid~ntiml u~o~ which ar~ less than t~n thousand
s~are feet in size shall be twenty-five dollar~ ($25.00). No
appropriate fee.
(b) A program administration fee of one thousand dollars
($1,000.00) for each $it~ plan and a fee o~ one
dollars ($1,o~0.00) plus forty dolla~ ($40.00) per uinglu
family residential lo= for each subdivision plan shall be paid
to the county at the time of filing of eaoh =rouion and
$~diment control plan ~or r~view in c~nn~u%ion wi~h disturbed
land areas for uses which are ten thousand (10,000) square feet
revocation of such pe~it pursuant to this cha~ter, an
adminimtrative fee in an amount equal to on~-~alf of
(d) NO busines~ located wi=bin an Enterprise Zone Oesignated by
the Co~onwealt~ of Virginia shall be required to pay any of
the fees described in t~is section. This exemption s~all
~xpire on D~ce~er 31, 1014.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
vote: Unanimous
96-235
TO COI~STDER ~ ORmTNANCE TO ;d,~.ND THE CODE OF TEE
COUNTY OP OHESTERFIEnD. 1978. kS ~MENDED.__~.y..AHENDING
REENACTING ~EOTION8 8-3~ AND 8-52 RELATIN~ TO THE
CONSUMER T~X ON TELEPHONE SERVICES
Mr. Stegm~ier stated the Board held a public h~a~ing on March
27, 1996 regarding adoption of an ordinance relating to the
consumer tax on telephone services. When asked, he stated
staff is addressing the mechanisms ts ~nsure that when
Chesterfield residential consumers pay the tax to the cellular
phone company, the funds will remain in chesterfield.
O~ notion of Hr. MoHale, ~econded by Mr. Barber~ the Board
adopted the follow~ng ordinance:
A~ ORDINANC~ TO A~RND TME CODE OF TEE CO~Y
O~EST~FIELD, 1978, AS ~ENDED, BY,ENDING
~D REENA~ING ~ECTION~ 8-38 ~D 8-B2 RE~TING TO
TME CONM~R TAX ON TELEPMONE SERVICES
BE IT O~AINED by the Boa~d of Supervisors of
County:
(I] ~at sectiunm $~35 and ~-52 of the Code of the County
S~c. 8-3S. Amount of tax.
~rsuant to ~m au~ori~y set forth in code of Vir~inla,
section 58.1-5813, there is hereby imposed a~d levied by the
county upon ea~Du~aser of local exoh~ge telephone ~vice,
a tux in th= amount of on= dollur ($1.00) per telephonu linc
per mon~. ~is ta~ shall be pai~ by ~a p~rcha~r to
seller of local exchange telephone ~e~ice for th~ use by the
county to payee initial capitol, instulla=ion and main=~ance
coats and recurring maintenance costs of its E-~11 system.
S~c~ 8-52. Amount of tax on telemhone ~tilltv ~ervice.
Virginia there is hereby imposed and levied by~c county upon
each and every con~er of teleoo~unioation ~ervioe as that
te~ is defined by Section 58.1-3812 a tax on the service
~a~e ma4e by the seller against the consumer wi~respeot to
the service. The tax shall ~e calculated as follow~:
(1) Residential con~umer~: Twenty (20) percent of
the consumer'~ monthly billing from the uell~r,
percent of ~he first two h~dred dollars
($200,00), plus one (1) percent of the ~ount
betwe~ Cwo hundred one dollars ($201.00} an~
ten t~ousand dollars ($10~000.00)~ plus
one-half of one (Q.9) perc~% of the balance of
the consumer's monthly billing from the seller.
(3) Notwi~s~anding ~ foregoing, the tax
to a ¢onsumer of mobile local teleoo~unication
monthly ~oss charge to the cons~er, but mba11
96-236
(b) The tax ~hall be Raid by the consumer to the seller,
for the use ct the county, at the time the billing submitted by
between the consumer and seller.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon adoptlsn.
Vote: Unanimous
L~ O~IOU8 ~SS~S OP PROPERTY FOR T~E SOUPY
CHEST~PIELD
~. St~aier stated th~ Board held a publi~ h~arlng on March
~7, 1996 regarding adoption of an o~dinanoe to establish an
annual tax level on various classe~ of 9roperty for the Coun=y
of Chesterfield as follow6:
Real E~tate Sl.09
~ersonal ~roperty
Machinery and Tools $1.00
Airplanes
for Volunteer
Fir~fighter and
Wild an~ Exotic
~imal~ $0.01
vehicles using
Fuels $3.24
~en asked, Mr. Ramsay stated the proposed ordlnanae wo~ld not
$~.09 t~ $1.08 f~r calendar y~ar 1997 when the availability of
~. Barber stated it was his understanding that the me, ion on
adopting a budget ~ould not include the tax reduction i~sue on
the pending revenue li~t.
Mr. Daniel stated it is his understanding that th~ rate
still ~1.09 and ~at only when th~ additional r~venue comes
forth, th= tax reduction ite~, which is a one cent rm~uction in
the ta~ ~at~ with a co~t impact on this ~ear's ~udget
approximately $~50,000, will be conside=md.
~. Barber stated it was hie under~tan~inq tha~ th~ ad,ack
it~m~ would ba d~alt with aa t~e revenu~ picture cleared d~ing
late S~er and =hat =he items would not De deal~ wi~ a~ ~his
time.
Mr. Daniel clarifisd that th~ tax rate ~or the upoomin9 budget
Board can decide, at that time, whether it want~ to make a
revenue reduction of $5~0~000, and if ~o, will i~ple~e~t
$1.08 for the reminder of the fiscal year.
~. Ste~aler stated th, $1.0~ tax rate Go~l~ Ds for th~
tax year.
96-237
4/10/96
Mr. Daniel stated if the $1.08 rate is adopted, it will become
the new baseline for the 1997/98 tax yea~ and if the Board does
net adopt the $1.~ rate, it will stall begin the process of
budgeting and distributing dollars at the $1.09 level. When
asked, he stated it would take an action o~ the So,rd ~u change
the rate from a $1.09 to
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, th~ Board
adapted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE ANNUAL TAXLEVY
OM VARIOUS CLASSES 0P PROPERTY FOR THE
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Chesterfield ~hat ~o~ the year beginniDg on the first day of
January, 1996, and ending On th~ thirty-first day of
1996, the taxes on property in all the Maglsterial Districts of
the County of Chesterfield shall be ag fcllowg:
se~..1. ~ea]~P~Dertv and Mobile
On tracts of land, lots or improvementm thereon und on
value thereof.
motor vehi~le~ and on all tam, ibis personal property used or
hsld in connection wi~h ~ny mining, manufacturinq or other
business, trade, occupation or profession, including
£ttrnishings, furniture and appliances in rental units, the tax
shall be $3.60 on every $1D0 of the assessed value thereof.
(bp On aircraft ag defined by Section 58.1-3503 and -3506
es the Code of Vlr~inia, 19~0, ~s amende~, the tax shall be
$.s0 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof.
(c) On motor vehicles owned by members of
reeeus ~guads, volunteer f~re dspartments, volunteer police
chaplalns and by auxiliary police officers as provided in
Seot~e~ 8-13.3, Code of the County of Chsstsrflel~, 197~,
value thereof.
(~) On wild or sxo~c animals as defined by Suction ~.1-
35~6 o~ the Code of Virginia, 1950, as a~end~d, the ta~ shall
be $0.01 on every $100 of th~ assesse~ value thereo~.
(e) On motor ~ehicles which use clean sDscial ~uels
defined in Section 58.1-l!01 of the Code of Virginia, 1950~ as
v~lue thereof.
S~c. 3. Public Service Corporation Property.
(ap On that portion of real e~tute und tangible personal
equalized as pro~ided in ~ection S8.1-~6~4 of the Code of
Viruiuia, 1~0, as amundu~, the tax shall be $1.09 on every
$100 of the assessed value thsreof deternined by the Stut~
Corperatisn Commission.
(b) The foregoing subssst~ens to the contrary
~otwit~sta~ding, on a~tomobiles and trucks bel0~gi~g tO ~eh
public mervlca corporations the tax shall be $3.60 on s~sry
$100 Of assessed value thereof.
96-238
Sos. 4. Machinery and Tools.
on machinery and tools used in a manuSacturing or mining
business the tax shall be $1.00 on every $100 a~ses~ed value
Vote: Unanimous
7.A.7. TO CONSIDER ~O;TTON OE TNE PRO~OR;D FYg7 0PERATIN~
BUDGET
M~. Steg'maier eteted the Board held a public hearinq on Ma~ch
27, 199~ on the proposed FYi7 Operating Budget and actlsn
requested is for the Board to adopt the F¥97 Operating Budget.
on motion of Mr. Warren~ seconded by MSS, HUmphrey, the Board
adopted the proposed F¥97 Operating Budget, as a~ended.
Vote: unanimous
7.A,a. TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION TO ~ROFET~,~.FUNDS
ESR EY9~-97
a resolution to approprlat, fund~ for
O~ ~Otio~ of Mr. Morale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Boar~
adoDted the following resolution:
A RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE DESIGNATED FUNDS A~D ACCO~NTS
FROM DE$IG~AT~O ESTIMATBD REVENUZS FOR F~97 FOR
OPEIIATING BUDGET AND T~E CAPITAL I~ROV~NTS
?0R T~E COWRY OF CHEST~IELD FOR THE GENE~L P~D
THE COWRY OF CHESTERFIELD
of Chesterfield:
That for the fiscal year beginning on the first
day of July~ 1996, and ending on the thirtieth
day of June, 1~?, the following sections shall
be adopted=
The fOlloWin~ designated funds and accotuits
shall be appropriated from ~he designated
estimated revenues to operate and to provide a
sapital improvements ~rogram for the County:
General
Estimated Revenue:
From Local Source~
General Property Taxes
Licenses! Permite, Fees
Fines & Forfeitures
Other Lsoai ~ovenue
From Other Agensies
State, Federal e other Localities
Transfsr from utilitiee
Anticipated Fund Balance 7/1/96
Total Revenue
$194~198~300
$,~58,300
$67,$00
13;654~600
~,057,600
25,600
361,311,700
96-239
Appropriations:
General Goverr~ent
Administration of Justice
Public Safety
Public Works
Health and Welfare
Parks, Rsc., Cultural
Community D~velopment
Non-Departmental
Debt Service
Health Center Commission
Fund Balance
Total General Fund:
Comurehen~iv¢ Services Fund
Estimated Revenue:
From State a Other LoGaliti~
From General Fund
From School Fund
Total Revenue
' Appropriations:
Operating Expenses
Total Comprehensive Servioss Fund
19,839;900
3,468,700
61,830,300
31,871,000
8,952,100
4,399,800
11,673,150
12,365,700
361e311,700
1~672~500
631,600
2,707,500
2.707.5~
State
Transfer from School CI~ Fund
Transfer from General Fund:
State Sale~ Tax
Local Taxe~
Beginning Fun~ ~alance
Tohal Revenue School Operating Funds:
Appropriations:
Instruction (includes
for Comprehensive Services Act)
Administration/A.& H.*
Pupil T~anspo~tation
Operations and Main~snaece
Debt Service
Food Service
Total Approp=iations fo~
operating Funds:
School Caoital Protects Fund
Total Revenue School Capital Projects
Transfer to School Operating Fund
$12~056,4O0
101,89~,000
7~983~$0O
131.371.000
1.000.000
$192,644,402
1~,8~8,41~
29r270~000
10.470.000
870.300
~70.300
TntalApprop~iations School Capital~oJects Fund:8?0,300
County Grants Fu~nd
¢1iot9~
g6-240
Estimated
From the State & Federal Government
Total Revenue
Appropriations:
Youth services ~oo,7oo
COPS MORE 329,600
Community Corrections Services ~6,?00
Family Preservation 145,000
~/Infant Planning 5,700
Victim/Witness Assistance 74,400
Litter 8rant ~o,ooo
Pretrial Release ]23~00
Co~m~unity Development Block Grant 1,4S4,000
Housing 104,200
VJCCCA 913,600
Drug Prosecution 92.900
Total County Grant Fund 4,040,000
~.o~ntv.~I~ Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Expenditures:
County Capital Projects
Equity Transfer to Construction Management Fund
Total County CIP Fund 4,021,800
County Maintenance
Estimate~ Revenue:
¢ounty~aintenance Projects
Estimated Revenue:
Total Revenue 7~975,~00
Appropriations:
Co~nioations/Eleotronics 620.600
Total Vehicle and Communications
Est/mated Revenue:
F~i~y Trans£ex from C~unty Capltel Prejscts Fund 50.000
Appropriations:
Addition to Retained Earnings
T0~al Expenditures: 351,000
2,~12,600
227.400
4,040,000
E~timate~ Revenue:
Service char~es
Beginning ~und Bquity,
Total Revenue
Approp~±ations:
Risk aanagement O~eratiens
Endimg Fund ~q~/ity, 06/30/97
Estimated Revenue: Sales
Apprepriatlen~:
Internal Distribution and operations Fund
Sale~
Ume of Reserves
Total Revenue
Appropriations:
Total County Airport ~und
Airport caDital Immrsvsment Fund
Estimated Revenue:
Transfer from General Fund
Appropriations:
C~pltal Co~t R~=overy Charg~
Transfer from Construction Fund
2,445,200
2.964.$00
5,410,000
~,47~,~00
799~900
5,410,000
2,993,370
136,430
3,129,800
290,500
65,400
127,700
48~.600
~83,600
95~300
103,600
302.105
§01,03~
501.000
501,000
291050
29,050
~9,050
33~4A8~000
10,500.000
17,672~900
71,300
96-242
Other Revenue
Total Revenue:
Appropriations:
Operat~on~
Debt Serviue
Tr&nefe~ to County Capital Projects
Transfer to General fund
Transfer to Water Improvement ReplacemQnt Fund
Transfer to Improvement Replacement Fund
Capital Projects
Total utility Fund
0
6,0~2. 900
76,2~9,500
25,873,B00
7,714,~00
~0,400
25,600
10,500,000
8~264~500
23,861.000
76,299,500
Appropriations in addition to those contained in
the general appropriation re,slutish may be made
by the Boa~d only if there i~ available in th~
£ua~ an unencumbered and unappropriated s%~
sufficient to meet ~uch appropriations.
E~eept aa set forth in ~entions 7, 13, 1~, 16,
17, 18, 19, en~ 20 ~he County A~ministrator may,
as provided herein, authorize the transfer of
any unencumbered balance or portion thares~ Srom
within th~ same dspartm~n~ or appropriation
function/category. ~na County Administrator may
tranm£er up tu $2Q,OO0 from the uneneunberod
hala~ee of the appropriation of one
appropriation function/category to another
appropriation function/catsqory. No more than
one transfer may be mad~ for the same item
cauning the need for a transfer, unless the
total amount to be transferred for the item does
The County Administrator may increase appropriations
for the followlng itnms of non-budgeted revenne that
may occur durlng the fiscal year:
a. Insurance recoveries received for damage to
County vehicles or other property for which
County fUndS have been 9xpended to make repairs.
b. Re~unds or reimbursement~made to the County for
Which the County ha~ expended funds directly
related to that refund or reimbursement.
sec. u (a~
Ail outgtandin~ enokh~brance~, both operating and capital,
at June 30, 1996 ~hall be reappropristad to the 1996-97
fiscal year to the same department and account for which
they are encumbered in r2%e previous year.
sec. 5 (bi At the close of the fiscal year, all unencum-
bered appropriations lapse for budge~ items
other ~han capital Frojeots, reserves~ refunds
for o£f-sit~an~ oversi~e wa~er and wastewater
facilities, grants, and donations restricted to ......
spe¢ifi~ purposes.
see. 6 AppropriatiOns designated for capital projects
will not lapse at the end Of the fiscal ~ear but
shall remain appropriations until the completion .~
of the project or until th~ Board of
Supervisors, by appropriate ord£mans~ or
resolutionr change~ or eliminates the
4/10/96
appropriation. The County Administrator may
approve necessary accounting transfers between
funds to enable the capital projects to be
accounted for in ths correct munne~. L~cn
completion of a capital project, staff is
authorized to close out the project and transfer
to the funding source any remaining
This section applies to all existing appro-
priations for Capital Projects ak June 30~ 1994
and appropriations in the 1996-97 budget. The
County Administrator may approve construction
change order~ to contracts up to an increase of
$15,000 and approve all change orders
red~ctions to contracts.
That the County Administrator may authorize the
transfer o~ utilities Capital Projects funds
that are 20% ur up to $100,000 of th~ original
project cost, whichever is less, from any
Utilities capital Project to any other utility
Capital Project Or to the original funding
source. Should the actual contract price for a
project be mi~nificantly (over $100~000} less
than the appropriation, the county Administrator
may approve transfer of xxc~ss f~nds to the
funding source prior to ad,pie=ion of thc
project.
That the approval by the Board of Supervisors of
any grant of funds to the County constitutes t-he
appropriation of both the revenue to be
from the grant and the County~o expenditure
r~quircd by th~ term= of the grant, if any.
Allocation of Food S~amp~ Will ~e considered a
~oard approve~ grant for purpose~ of thi~
seotio~ up to the actual velu~ of food stamps
received. The appropriation of grant funds will
not lapse at the end of the fiscal year, but
shall remain appropriated until completion of
the project or until the Board of Supervisors,
by appropriate resolution, changes or
the appropriation% The c0~ntyAd~i~istrator may
redusa' any grana appropriation to the level
approved by the granting agency during the
fiscal year. The County Ad~inis~ra=or may
approve necessary accounting transfcr~ between
funds to enable ~e grant to De aoooun=ed for in
the correct manner. Upon completion of a ~ra~t
projeu~, staff is authorized to close out the
grant and transfer back to the funding source
any remaining balanues. This applies to
appropriations for grants outstanding at June
38, 1996 and approDrlations in the 1996-97
budget.
The County Administrator may appropriate both
revenue and expenditure ~or donations made by
citizens or citizen groups in s~ppo~t of County
programs. Any r.e~.aining unencumbered balance of
a restricted donation ut the end of the fiscal
fiscal year.
Th~ County Administrator ~ay reduce revenue and
frunded all or in part by the ~o~onwealth of
Virginia and/ur the federal government ~o ~he level
approved ~y the r~pon~ible ~tat~ or f~deral agency.
¢/~o/~s
96-244
Geo. 11
~eo. 16
Sec. 17
Sec. 18
The Director of the Accounting Department i~ autho-
rized to make transfers to the various funds for
~hioh there are transfers budgeted. The Director
shall transfer funds only as needed up to amounts
budgeted~ or in aeoordanse with any existing bond
resolutions that specify the manner in whio~
transfers are to be ~ade.
The Treasurer may advance monies to and from the
various funds 0£ ~ke County %0 allow mexim~rm cash
flee efficiency. The advances must not violate
csunby bond covenants or other legal restrictions
that would prohibit" an advance.
The County Administrator is authorized to make
expenditures from T~ust & Agency F%U~ds for the
specified reasons for which the funds were esta-
blished. In no ca~e shall the expenditure exceed
the available balance in the fund.
The County Administrator may transfer supplemental
rs=irement, Worker's Compensation fundsw healthcare
for retirees, and/or any amount of the Insuran=e
Reserve funds consistent with the Ceunty'~ Risk
The portion of th~ reserve for capital projects
~elated to the schscl budget will be added to the
re~erve for future capital projects in %he general
fund; the portion r~lated to the school budget will
be designated for school projects.
The County Administrator may ~pre~riate revenues
and increame expenditure~ for funds received by the
County from asset forfeitures for operating
e~penditurez directly ~lated to drug enforcement.
This applies tu funds currently on-hand at June 30,
1996, and all funds received in =he 1996-97 budget
year.
The outs=ending balance of these funds at June 30,
1996 or June 30, 1997 shall not lapse but be carried
forw=r~ into the ns~t fiscal yea~.
The County Administrator may increase the general
fund appropriation in the School Op~ratlng ~und
contingent upon availability cf funding and taking
into considerations any other expenditureswh£chmay
have occurred based on the following schedule:
a. Increase general fund t~ansfer/a~p~op~iation on
December 15 by $1,500,000,
b. Increase general fund trans£er/apprcpria~ion on
~ehrua~y 15 by $1,500,000.
c. Increase general fund transfer/appropriation on
April 15 by $1,500,800.
After completion of all necessarya~dit'transaet~ons-
for General ~und and School Operating Funds, the
County Administratur may at his diacretion, increase
appropriations or authorize transfers of existing
a~pro~riutions at June 30 as followm:
a. Subee~snt ts. all audit adjustments . and the
ending general £und balance is maintained at a
maximum of 7.5% of general fund expenditures,
transfer all available curr~nt year operating
~/1~/9~
96-2~5
funds to t/la general fund reserve for future
capital projects.
Thio applies to funds currently on-hand at June
30~ 1996~ and ell funds resei¥~d in the 1996-97
budget year.
sac. 19 TBS county Administrator io authorized to reallocate
funding ~ources for Capital Projects, arbitrage
rebatns/penaltieo, and deb~ services payments and to
appropriate bond interest earnings tO minimize
arbitrage re~ateo/penaltios. This authority would
include the appropriation of transfers among funds
specific Capital Proj~ct~ will not be increased
beyond the level authorize~ by Sections $ and 4.
This applies to funds currently on-hand in F¥96, and
all funds received in the 1996-97 budget year.
Dec. 20 The County Administrator io authorized to transfer
among appropriation categories any amount of f~nds
associated with implementation of ~he Co~pr~henmlve
Services Act for at-risk youth and families and
funding associated with ~he implementation of the
VJCCCA Grant to record transactions.
$=c. 2.% Sala~ie~ for Planning commissioners will ~
increased e~uivalent to the increase given to all
County =mploye~s.
Sec. R~ Effective upon adoption of this resolution, the
County Administrator is authorized to approve
transfers among funds a~ long as total net spending
i~ not insr~azsd.
Sec. 23 Effective upon ~option of ~hls resolution, the
Utiliti~ Department rate stabilization r e s e r v e
shall be created and maintained a~ p~r ~u~dellnem
outline~ below;
a) Beginning with fiscal year 1000, the minimum
annual ee~trib~tio~ to the reserve will be 50% cf
the previous year's deDreciatlcn on fixed a~s~ts.
b) Tho annual =ontrlbution to the reserve will
continue until 100% of accumulated depreciation on
the fixed.assets are funded. If at the beginning
Of a fiscal year a reserve balance exceeds 100% of
accumulated depreciation, a reduction in th~ annual
contribution may be considered.
c) Beginning with fiscal year 20~0~ funds canno~ be
used from the rate stabilization re,arvn if the
balance falls below 25% of that ntility's fixed
d) ~ke declaration of a finaa¢ial e~ergency by th~
director of ~tilitie~ and a oo~r~sDondlng four-
fifths vote by the Board of Supervisors at a
publicly advea'tioed meeting declaring the existence
of ouch an emergency is required to suspend Sec. 23-
a, Sec. 23-b, and Sec. 23-c.
Vote: Unanimou~
It was generally agreed to recess for five minutes.
4/10/96
96-246'
R~eonvenlng:
IMPROVeMeNT
Mr. steOmaier reviewed revisions to the YY97-2001 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) including Chester and
Libraries bainq ~ov~d up to FY99; ~a~anqing funding f0~ t~
co~icationm system u~rade project to acco~odate the
acceleration of the Chester and L~Prad~ Libraries; funding for
Phillips Fire Station being rsallocated fo~ the wint~rp~ck Fire
Rtatlon land acqui~itlon and A&~ ~n FY~8; addlnq the Wint~ock
FY~O0~; ~hiftlng $~.~ m~tllom in debt ~apacity fr~ th~
Co~unlty Development ~uil~ing to the Winterpock Fire Station
Project and appropriating $3.3 million from the Rese~e for
Capital ~rojeo~s'for~ community D~veloDm~n= 5uilding; adding
$~0,000 in FY97 from the R~se~e for Capital ~rojects for
picnic ~helters a= Robious Landing; an4 addin~ the Re~ Road
Fire Station for $3.55 million in FY2002. ~e then reviewed
unresolved CIP it~.imoludin~ ~100,000 in FY97 fo~ foundation
and pla~ter repairs to ~9~ngton ~antatlon; $110,000 for
re~troom facillnies at Manchester Hfqh School
FY99); $169,000 in FYP? for re~troo~ facilities at Warbru
Athle=ic Comple~ (to be repaid ~n ~Y99)~ $~0~0~0 for football
construction of three co~unity/senior center in the Dale,
Clover Hill, and Hidlothian Districts.
reviewed the Droject~ in the CIP that, if adopted, will be
fundmd from th~ FY97 Rese~e for Capital projects including
$29,050 for Airport inprovement~; $200,000 for drainage
projects; $480,00~ for the ~outhern Area Transfer ~tation;
$400,~00 for a Records Holding.bui.ldinq; $4~0,0Q0 for site
option to purchase additionai pa~k land at the Western A~ea
Park; $900,000 for the P~lic Safety Training Cen~er a~ ~non;
$100,oo0 for traffic signal priority control systems; $300,000
~or industrial access road projects; $500,000 to march State
funds in the road fund project; and $5Q~,00~ for other general
road i~provement~.
Mr. Daniel clarlfi~d that, if aDprove~, Rob~ous ~ndln~
($50,000), ~pping%sn ~lan~a%ion. ($100,000), Manchester High
School ($110%000}, Warbro AthIet~c Complex ($169,o00), and
Rea~ Road ~le~entary ($8~,000) Projects would also all be
funded from the FY97 Resets for Capital
O~ ~ot~on of Mr. Warren~ s~conded by Mr. Barber~ the Board
2001 capital Improvement Pro.am (CIP), to be funded from the
FY97 Rese~e for capital
Vo~e: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. McHale% seconded by Mr. Warren, the- Board
approved the following amen~men=s to the first year of
FY97-2001 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), to be fHnded
the F¥97 Reserve for Capital Projects: Rsbisus Landing
($50,000), Eppington Plantation ($100,000), ~anch=~b~r High
SChOOl ($110,00O), Warhro Athletic Complex ($169,000), and
Rea~ Road Elementary
Vote; Unanimous
4/1~196
96-247
On median of Mr. Daniel, Sec0ndad by ~ir. ~¢Hale, the Board
deleted the Community/~snio~ Centers Proj=ct, as a bend
referendum iteM, from the ~YP?-2QQ1 capital Improv~ent Program
Unanimous
On motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by /~r. Barber, the Board
approved modifying the FY97-~001 Capital Improvement
(CIP) as follows: Accelerating Chester and LaPrade Libraries
~o FY99? Rearranging the timing of fundE for the Co~unicatlon
System U~grades to accommodate the acceleration of the chester
an~ LaPra4e Libraries~ funding far Philli9~ Fire Station being
reallocated fo~ Winterpock Fire Station land acquisition and
A&E in FYPS; adding wint~rpook~ire ~tation =onstruction to th~
CIP for $5.3 million in FY2001; shifting $3.3 million in debt
capacity from ~he Co~ity Davulopment Building to
Winterpock Fire Station and ~llocati~g $3.~ million from the
Re~e~e for capital ~:oject~ ~or the Co~i~y Development
Building, and ad~ing Reams Road Firm Station for $3,55
in FY2002.
vote: Unanima~a
~roject~ to each Board member.
~r. ~arb~r th~n mad~ a ~otion for the Board to amend the
to ~e transportation
Mr. Daniel ~tnted h~ feels the c~rent CIP should remain in
plaoe ~nd =~ ~e~l with ~e =ransportation projects next year.
When asked, Mr. Barbar stated he had approached Mr. McCracken
about putting together a list of transportation p~io~tie~,
in fa=t, the Board felt ~he ~ranspor~ation projects were
hi~her ~riority than to h~ve Cunding earmarked for~e Airport
improvements.
Mr. Warren clarified that the list is only an example and coul~
b~ a~jumt~ after a public hearing. Me ~tated approximately
~illion is being requested to be all0cate~ ~owar~s
~imtrict to replace th~ $5 mill~on in Airport improvements.
Mr. Daniel state~ he could mupport ~. Barb~'s mo~ion if
tranmpo~atlon projeot llst and the Riband Internatlonal
Airart project were both on ~m ~funded l~mt.
Mr. Warren stated he r~gards the re,est as shifting emphasis
from a r~gion~l Airport ~mmue to a local transportation issue.
Mr, Mica~ clarified that Mr. Burber'm motion would replaoe the
curr~nt Airpor~ item with the draft list of transportation
consists of projects throughout all five Districts.
~. Barber ~tated he considers the draft list of
on using ~m $~ million on local transportation needs rather
4110196
Mr. Daniel stated if the ~otion pa~es, he would like an
instruction motion to follow that WOUld request the Board of
Supervisors to in~truct all itm members on the Capital Region
Airport Commisoion, as well as its citizen appointee, that they
local government funding for Airport ~improvements during the
five year CIP tlm~ frame because the ~oard had eliminated the
Airport from the cIP. Ke further mtated he feels it is
important that, whatever the County'~ message im r~garding
regional ~ue~ it must be clear, concise, and consistent.
There was brief discussion~ relative to the Capital Region
Airport Co~mls~ion r~qu~ting all local governments to
participate in the long-term campaign fo~ i~prov~ents to the
Richmond International Aider% an~ %he Air, or% Project item
being placed in th~ CIP w~th ~e caveat of being a di~on
item.
~. Barber stated he does not feel the motion to replac~ the
Airport item wi~ the transportation it~, iS approved, would
preclude the Board from supporting fun~in~ ~or ~n~ Ai~o~.
~everal years and that he feelE-to ramovo tho item at this
~. McHale in~ired as to whather Mr. Barber's request could be
added a~ an unfunded addition to th~ C~ and wh~er with the
regional $5 million Airport item could be l~sted a~ an unfun4ed
transportation re~e~t to the unfu~de~ li~t and moving the
Ai~pur~ i~m to ~h~ unfunded llst, ~e Boar~ ~ould increase the
Undesignated Capital Reserve.
~. McHale made a substitute motion, ~aconded by ~. Daniel,
for the ~oard to mov~ the capitol Region Air~ort Projeot to th~
unfunded FY97-2001 Capital Improvement Pr~ram (CI~} lint an~
%c add the transportatlon request to the unfunded CIP llst.
~. sarber ~tate4 Air~ort funding is not a local gover~ent's
D~ogativ~ and that federal money, generally fro~ the
Airport~. Ke further ~tated that he feels with el! the other
government, it is not wise to venture in~o funding Airport
locally raised money on local projects would be serving
oi:~zenm well. ~e fur~he~ ~=ated ~e ~oe~ not support the
~ubstltute motion of placing elth~r of th~ proj~ctm i~to the
unfunded category of Capital Improv~ents. ~e stated that the
~oard i~ not duty ~oun4 to'vot~ for or against local funding
and ~at he feel~ the Board ~hould u~ ~ $5 million in tax
population.
$5 million in funding for the Capital Region AirpoTt Co~ission
Project to the unfunded list in the PY97-200~ Capital
Improv~ent Program (CIP); add the list of $5 million-' ~n
CIP; and %o t~an~f~r the $5 million, allocated for the Airport
Project, to the Reserv~ for Capital Projects.
Ayes: ~r. Daniel, Mrs. Hum~hrey~ Mr. ~cHale.
96-249
4/10/96
M_r. Daniel stated because tho ~ejeots will be placed on the
unfunded CIP limt, thny w~ll be brought back to f-he Bsard, on
an annual basis, for continuing review.
Mr. Daniel clarified that with all the motiona mad~ by the
Bea~d~ the entire FY97-2001 CIP was adopted, as wended.
O~ motion Of M~. McHalo, o~eonded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
suspended its rules at this time to amend the agenda to add
Item 7.C.4.c., Set Date for Public Hearing to consider
Amendments to t-he Gross Receipts BPOL Tax, and to add Item
7.~c.4.d., set Date for Publi= Heuring to Con~ide~ the Tax
Abatement for Residential-strut%utes.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. ~oMale, seconded by Mr. Berber, t~e Beard
amended the Agenda and added Item ?.C.4.c., Set Hate for ~ublic
and Item 7.C.4.d., Set Cate for Public Hearing to Con~id~r the
Tax Abetment for Re~identlal St~ct~es.
On me,fun of ~r. ~cHale, ~e~onded by ~. Warren, the Doard
m~pended its ~les at ~is time ~o allow si~lta~eo~
nomination/appointer of members to serve on the C~p Baker
Mun~g~ment Board.
Vo~: Unan~mou~
7.C. DON~ENT ITEHS
?.C.~. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS_
?.O.l.a. RECO~NI~IN~ HAY 1~-~8. 1996 AS "NATIONAL LAW
On motion of Mr. McHale, ~econded by Mr. ~arber, the Board
adopted t~e following re~olution:
~I~EITEAS, the dedicated, loyal, and bravo members of Law
Enforcement Agencies throughout the County provide mn
invaluable Service to all citizens; and
WH~EAS, tho week of ~oy 12-18, 1996~ is recognized
outstanding and professional individuals as law enforcement
officers in Chesterfield Co~/nty who serve to protect the
hsal~h~ saf~ty~ and welfare of its citizenry; and
1995~ as "National Law Enforcement Week" in Chesterfield County
and calls this recognition to the attention of al~ its
citY,eno.
Vote: Unanimous
?.C.i.h. RECOQNI~IN~ APRIL ~1-~?~ [996 A~
~R.~T~IES..WEEK! ~ND APRIL 24, 199~ Aa *~PROFESSIDNAL
SED~ET~RIES DAY"
On motion of ~r. McHule, seconded ~y ~. Barber, th~ Board
adopted the f011owiDg re,clarion:
~EA~ ~he i~DoTtanc~ of professional
~erlcan public and pri~ate organizations has b~n recognized
by the designation of April ~1-27~ 1996 a~ "National
Secretaries Week~; and
~, persons who s~rve ~sterflmld County in thi~
job classification must meet hiq~ standards of
through a combination of effective interpersonal abilitie~
technical clerical ~kills, ~esponsive and courteou~ ~ervic~ to
citizens and fellow employees, and knowledge and ap~llcation
n~erou~ county and departmental policies amd p~ocedu~; and
~EAS, the Administration wi~h~ to ~r~ its
e~oellence in public service and for their ~o~tributions
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, tha~
County Board of S~pe~isors hereby recognizes all County
secretaries for their invatuabl~ oon%~ibutions to the ~ounty
a~ its citizens.
Vote~ Unanimous
on motion of Mr. MoHale, seoonde~ by Mr. Barber~ the Board
approved ~ raffle permit for Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and
Thomas Dale High School Parents Graduation committee,
Incorporated, for calender year 1996.
7.C.~. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directlon~ from thi= Board, made report in ~riting upon his
bistrict, and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia D~partment uf
Trunsportutioo h~s udvised the Director of Environmental
~ngfneerin~, the streets i.n ~awn Creek, Sea,ion 1,
District, meet the requirements established by the ~
Street Re=uirem~nts o~ the virginia Department
Transportation,
~herea~, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation nave entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Bock 1453, Page 495, January 21, 1994, for all stormwater
detention/retention facilities in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, and on mot~nn of Mr.
McKale, ~econded by ~r. Barber, ~t is resolved that the roads
in Fa%;n Creek, Section 1, Matoaca District, be and they hereby
~4 b~ it further resolved, that the Virginia Depar~ent of
T~ansDo~tation, be and i~ ~ereby ~equested to ta~e into t~e
4/10/96
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements,
the following:
Name of ~treet: Breaker Dr~ve Length: 0.14 mile
Frem:.End of read, 0.14 mile
south of Spring Run Road,
To: Spring Run Road, State Route
0.15 mile nerth of Bailey
Bridge Road, State Rout~ 654
Guaranteed Right-of-Way of Width: 50 feet.
Name of street: Broc~et Ceurt Length: 0.07 mile
Fram: End of permanent cul-de-sac,
0.07 mile West of Brocket Drive
To: Brocket Drive, 0.05 mile south
of Spring Run Road, State Route 662
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 40 feet.
Name of Street: Camouflage Court Length: 0.05 Bile
Front End of permanent cu]-de-sac~
0.0~ mile west of Bracket Drive
~rocket Drive, 0,12 ~ile ~onth
0£ spring Run Road, btate Route 662
~uaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 40 feet.
This rag%test is inclusive of th~ adjacent slope, sight
distance, clear ~one and ~esi~nste~ Virginia ~epartme~t of
Transportation drainage ~asements indicated on the development
plat.
These roads serve 29 lets.
This section of Fawn Creek is recorded a~ follows:
Section 1~ Plat Boo~ 85~ Page 14~ August ~ 1994.
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made.repoLt in writing ~pon hi~
examination of the roads in Windsor Par~, Section 3,
District, and
Whereas, the Resident ~ngineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation ~as advised ~he Director oS ~nvirenmen~al
~ngineering, the streets in Windsor Fark, Section 3, Mutouca
District, meet the re~ulrements established by the Subdivision
Street Reo~irements of the Virginia Department of
Transpsr=atlon, and
Whereas, ~he County an~ =he Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
Book 2453, Pag~ 405, January 21, 1994, for ail stsrmwater
'detention/retention facilities in the Cot~nty.
Therefore, upon consideration w~e~eef, and on motion of Mr.
McHsle, seconded by Mr. Barber, it is resolved that the roads
in Windsc~ Park, Section 3, ~kktoeca Distriot, be and they
hereby are established as public roads.
An~ be i~ :u~the~ resolved, tha~ r/3e Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into
secondary System, ~ursuan: %0 Section 33.1-229, Co~e 0£
Virginia, and the Department'~ Subdivieion Street Requirements~
the following:
96-25~
Name of Street: Sylvan Ridge Road Length: 0.2~ mile
~rom: End of roa~, 0.$8 mil~ wes~
of Prince Phillip Lane, State
To: End of Sylvan Ridge Road, 0.12 mile
west of Prince PhilliD Lane~
State Route 4356
Guaranteed Right-of~Way of Width: 50 feet.
Name of Street: Sylvan Ridge Place Length: 0.0S mile
From: Sylvan Ridge Road, 0.20 mile
west of l~rlnoe Phillip Lane~
End ~er~ane~t c~l-de-sac, 0.08 mile
north of ~ylvan Ridge Road
Guaranteed Right-of-Way width: 50 feet.
Name of Street: Sylvan Ridge Court Length: 8.06 mile
From: Sylvan Ridge Road, 0.29 mile
west of Prince Phillip Lane,
End of cul-de-oac, 0.06 mile
north of Sylvan Ridge Road
Guaranteed Right-of-Way width: 50 feet.
This request is inclusiv~ of the adjacent slope, sight
dis%anco, clear ~one and designated Virginia Department of
Transportatiob drainage easements indicated on the development
plat.
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
direotion~ from thi~ Board, made report in writing upon his
examinatisn of the roads in Kichaux Creek, section A,
Midlothian District,-and
Wherea~ the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
Transpurt~tlcn ~a~ advised the Director cf Environmental
~ng±ne~ring, the streets in ~ichaux Creek, Section A~
Midlothian Bi~=ric=, meet the requirements e~tablis~ad by the
Subdi~ia~QD_~t~e~D._Re~uirements of .the Virginia Departmont of
Transportation, and
Whereas, t~e County and the Virginia Department of
Tran~portatlon have entered into an agreement, r~cord~d in De~d
Book 2~53~ Rage 405~ January 21, ~99A, for all stoP,wares
~etenticn/reten~icn fa=tittles in the County.
Therefore, upon coneideratloa whereof, and on motion of Mr.
McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, it is resolved that the roads
in Kichaux Creek, Section A, Midluthian Disaxict, he and they
hereby ara e~tablishad as public road~.
A~d he it f~the~ ~e~olved~ that the Virginia Department of
Second~ry System, pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of
virginia, an~ the Department's Subdivision street Requirements,
the following:
96-253
4/~ot96
Name of Street: North Otterdale Road'
From: N. Otterdale Read, state Route
970, 0.01 mile north of Wylderos~
Drive, State Route ~71
Beginning of temporary ~urnaround~
0.11 mile north of Wylderose Drive,
State Route 971
~uaranteed Right-of-Way of Width: 70 feet.
N~me of Street: Michaux Bluff Drive
From: N. Otterdale Read, 0.07 nile
north of ~ylderose Road, State
Route 971
To~ Intersection with Miohaux View Way,
0.15 mile east of N. otte~dale Road
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 60 feet.
Name of Street; Michaux View Way
From: Beginning of temporary turnaromnd~
0.13 mile east of Micha~ BlU~£ Orive
To: E~d of road, 0.03 mile north
of Michaux B~uff Drive
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
Length: 0.10 mile
Length: 0.1§ mile
~ength: 0.16 mile
Thi~ request is inclusive of thc adjacent slope, might
distance, clear zone and ~e$igna~ed Virginia
Transportation drainage easements indicated on the development
plat.
Th~se roa~s serv~ 18 lots.
This seotion of ~icha~x Creek i~ recorded as follows:
sec=ion A, Pla~ BO~k 79, Page ST, November 11~ 1992.
This day the county Environmental Engineer, in aooordanee with
directions from thxs heard, mede repor~ in writing upon his
examination of the road in Kic~haux Creek, Section B, Midlo%hian
Distri=t, and
Whereas, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of
T~anEportatio~ has ~dvi~ed the Director of Environmental
Engineering, the street in ~ichaux Creek, Section S, ~idlo~hian
District, meets the requir~ents established hythe Su~ivi~ion
s~reet Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation, and
W~e~eas, the County and th~ Virginia Department cf
Transportation have entered into an agreement, reuer~d in
Book 2453, Page 405, January ~1, 19~4, for all ~tor~water
4etention/rstention faciliti~ in the county.
Therefore,· upon conui~ra~ien whereo~, am~ on merles o~ Mr.
McKale, seconded by NL~. Berber, it is resotved that the road in
Miohaux Creek, Section B, ~idlothian District, he and it hereby
is established as a public road.
And be it fu~t~er ~=sOlYed, that the Virginia Department cf
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-~9, Co~e
Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Re~ulrememts,
the following~
Name ef Street: Miehuux View Way Length: 0.09 mile
~rom: ~iohaux view Way, 0.13 mile
east of Michaux Bluff Drive
End permanen~ cul-de-sac, 0.22
~ile east of Michaux Bluff Driv~
Guaranteed Right-of-Way of Width: 50 feet.
4/10196
96-254
This request is inclusive 0£ the adjacent slope, sight
distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation ~ralnage easements indlcatad on t.~a development
plat.
Thim road mervem 10 lots.
This section of Michaux Creek im recorded am follows:
~mctien R, ~lat ~ook aS, Page ~6, February 5, 1993.
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon hie
examination of the road~ in Miehau~ CreeK, Section C,
~idlo~hian District, and
Whereas, ~he ~esident Engineer for the Virginia D~artment
Transportation has advised the Director of Environmental
Engineering, the streets in Mis~au~ Cr~ek, Section C,
Nidlothian District, meet the requirement~ e~tablished by the
S~bdiviai0n Street Reuuirements of the Virginia DeDartn~nt of
Whereas, the County and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, recorded in Deed
B~ok 245~, Page 405, January ~1, 1994, for all ~tormwater
detention/retention facilities in the county.
Therefore~ upon consideration wherecf~ and on notion of ~r.
MeKale, seconded by Kr. Barber, it is re~olved that tho roads
~n M~ohaux c~eek~ Section C~ Midlothian District, be and they
And b= it £urth~r received, that the Virginia Department uS
Transportation, be and ie h~reby requested to take into the
Secondary System, pursuant to ~ection $~.1-22~, Code of
Virginia, and the Departnent's subdivision street Requirements,
the £0110wing:
~ame of street: ~ichauxview way Length: 0.09 Nile
o~ Miehaux Bluff DriV~
To: End of permanent cul-de-sac, 0.12
milo northwest o~ ~ichaux ~lufX Drive
Guaranteed Right-of-Way of Width: ~0 feet.
Name of S~reot: Miehaux Crae~ Place Length:
Fram: Michau~ View Way, O.OE ~le
Of Hieha~R Bluff Drive
TO: End of pernanent c~l-de-$ao, 0.07
Guuranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50feet.
Name of Street: Miohaux ~idge Court Length: 0.06 Nile
From: Michoux View Way, 0.14 mile east
of ~icheu~ Bluff Drive
To: End of permanent cul-de-sac,
0.06 mile north of Michaux view Way
~uarant~md R~ght-of-Way Widthz §0
This request is inclusive of ~he adjacent slope, sight
di~ta~oe~ clea~ zone a~d designated Virginia Deportment of
Transportation ~rainage easements in~icated on the development
plat.
These roads serve 28 lots.
4/10/96
96-255
This section o£ ~ichaux Creek is re¢ordad as follows:
Section C, Plat ~osk 83, Pages 15 & 16, November 30, 1993.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. ~cHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
consider the County's Bond Referendum.
Vote: Unanimous
?.O.4.b. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND T~E CODE OF THE
TO MODIFICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT STAND~%~DS ~
REQUIREMENTS
.on motion of M~. MoHale, seconded by M~. Ba~be~, the Board set
the date of May S, 199~ at 7:~0 p.m. for a public hearing to
consider un ordinance to um=nd the Cede of the Ce~ty of
Chs~ter£iel~, 197~, as amended, by amending an reenacting
Section ~1.1-1~.1 relating to modifications to development
s~andard~ and requirements.
Vote:~ Unanimous
PROFESSIONAL OCOUPATIONAL LICENSE IEPOL)__TA~
On mo~ion o~ Mr. MoHale, ~e¢onded by /~r. Barber, the Board set
the date of June 12, 1996 at 7:0Q 9.m. for a Dublio hearing to
consider amendments to the Gross Receipts Business Professional
Oocupaticnal Lioen~ (SPOL) Tax.
7,C.4,d, TO CONSIDER THE T~X ~BATE~E~T ~OR RESIDENTIAL
On motion of F~f. ~cHale, seeun~ed by ~r. Barber, the Board set
th~ dat= of June 1~, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. for a public hearing to
consider the Tax Abatement fo= Residential ~trueture~.
Vo=e: Unanimous
7. C,5. ABTHORI2ATION ~OR THE COHN~_~O_I~INTATN I~8
DISTRICT COMMISSION_AND_THE
DISTRICT
On mo=ion of ~. ~cHale, seoon~e~ Dy ~. ~arber, the Buar~
a~t~orized t~at the Cowry maintain its p~ticipation in the
Ric~ond Regional Pla~ing Dis=ric~ Co~i~iun and ~h~ Crater
Pla~i~g District
Vote: Unanimous
96-256
7.~.~. AWARD OF OON~TRU=TION ~ONTR~CT TO ~ERALD K. MOODY
On motion o£ ]~r. ~cHale, ~eoenfled by ~r. Barber, the Boa~d the
Board authorized the County Administrator to execute a contract
with Gerald K. Moody T/A Southern Construction Company, in the
amount of $233,3S6.00, fo~ the Chester /~rea Water Lin~
Replacement Proje¢=. (It is noted funding is available in the
e~nt CIP.}
Vote: Unanimou~
?.~.?. ~PPROVAL OF ~J~ ~88IONMBNT OF RIGHTS TO HTB LIMITED
P~RTNERSHIP
On motion Of Mr. Mc~ale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Boar~
approved an a~signment of rights to NTB Limited Partnership.
Vote~ Unanimous
On motion of Mr. MoMala, momcnded by Mr. Barber, the Board
(relmbur~ed by Dopant), with Rust Environment and
P~ejeot and authorized th~ County Administrator to exectlte the
necessary documentm. {It.im noted funds for the Project are
available in the current CIP.)
vote: Unanimous
on motion Mr. MoEale~ seconded by Fi~. Barb=r, th~ Bourd
~¢¢~pDed, on behalf of the county, the conveyance oS a paruel
of land containing 0.0359 acres along Willi~ Road (Route
from ~xxon Corpora=ion and authorized ~e county
Unanimoum
REPAIR8 TO THE B0N ~IR L~ISL C~Ig~TIONS T~ER
O~ ~otio~ Of M~. McHale, secondmd by Mr. Rarb~r, th~ Beard
appropriated, up to $100,000, in Risk Management R~cov~ry
funds, for r~pairs to th~ DO~ Air ~ndfill
Vo=~: Unanimoua
7.C.11. APPROVAL O~ ACQ~IOITION OF THE ~P~ENT 0F
On ~otlon of ~r. ~c~a~e, ne~ond~d by ar, Barber% th~ ~oard
approved the acquisition of ~e Department of Moto~
property, in ~ amount of $$2~000~ for o~fioe spaoe for the
Department of R~k Management.
96-257
4/zo/~
~DTHORI~TION FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF F~TRDS FOR THE
TI~MON~ BN~tNBEHIN~ FIP~MTO 8T~Y THE UBE OF ~LLOW
M~NAG~ENT PRACTICE FACILITIES
On motion of 14J~. ~c~al~, seconded by ~4r. ~arber, the Board
the Ti~on~ Engineering Fi~ to perfo~ an evaluation of the
R~se~oir as regional Best Hanag~ent ~ractice Facilities.
is no:~d ~f the d~partmant cannot absorb the oost, it will
covered by efficiencies in oth~r ar~a~ in th~ Budget at y~-
7,¢,L3, APPROVAL 0~ LE~SE WITH R,B, RITCHIE ~ND R,B, ~ITCHIE.
JR. PaR OPPICB SPACE YOR u uv~NI~ CO~R~
On motion of Mr. McNale~ ~econded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved a lease with R.E. Ritchie an~ R.B. Ritchie,
'Virginia Partner~hip~ far office ~pace lecate~ in the Airport
noted the source fe~ t~is lease Will Cam= from the F¥96
FY97 Virginia Juvenile communi=y crime Control AC=
Vote: Unanimous
9, HEA~I~OS O~ OITISENS ON ~R~OHEDULED~TTERS OR OL~IM8
T~er~ were ~o H~rings of ¢i~i~¢n~ on Unsoh~ul~d MaC, ers or
Claims.
REPORTS
accepted the fo]lowlng report~:
report on the General Fend Balance; Reserve for Future Capital
Proje¢~s~ District Road an~ s~eet Light Funds; an~ L~aae
Purchusus.
Vote: Unanimous
0 ~1~ B~K~RM~/~AGEME~T BOARD
0~ ~OtiO~ Of ~r. Mc~ale, ss=ended ~y Mr. Daniel, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed the following members to
Name
~ir. James ~. L~pkin Dale
~, Willi~ S. A~s Richmond ~ea Association
votes: Unanimous
4tZ0/96
9~-~58
11. DINNER
recessed to the Administration Building, Room 502, for dinner.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
1NVO~TIO~
St/th gave the lnvoe=tlon.
Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of A~erica.
14. RE~OLUTION~ AMD BPE~IAL REOO~NITIONG
14.~. RBCO~NI~ZN~ MR. N~TFL%N DAVI~ MATHIS. TROOP 879, UPON
~TT~ININ~ RANK OF ~LB ~CO~T
On motion of tho Board, the following resolution was adopted:
W~R~AS~ th~ Boy $0o~ts of ~rioa was incorporated by
Mr. Willi~ D. Boyce on Feb=uary 8, 1910; and
~ER~E, the Boy Scouts of Americ~ was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitnesm of
individ~al~; and
~s~ after earning at least twenty-one merit badges
in a wide varie=y of ~ields, serving in a leadership 9osition
in a troop, carrying out a servioe pro)eot beneficial to his
co--unity, being active in the trueD, demonstrating s~out
~pirit, and living up to thc Scout Oath and Law; and-
~S, Mr. Nathan Duvi~ Muthis, Troop 879, sponsored
high standards of occident and has reached the long-sought
goal of =a~le suout which is received by l~s= than two ~ercent
of these individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
himself on the ~eat accomplishment~ of his County, Nathan
indeed a m~mber of a n~w g~n~ra~ion of prepared young
of whom w~ can all be v~ry
NOW, ~EREPO~ BE IT RESOLVED, %ha= the ~e~terfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations
to~. Na=han David Ma~s and acknowled~es the good fortune of
=he county to have such an outs=anding young man as on~ of its
citizene.
Vote: Unanimou~
Mr. Barber presented the executed resolution to ~. Mathi$,
accompanied by ~mber~ of his family, congratulated him on his
4/10/0~
14.C. RXOOGNIEING THE OUTSTriP)IRe ~XRVIOE OF THE GOOD NEWE
J~IL ~ND PRISON MTNTETRY CF~FLAIES
Captain Donnie Whlte introduced Reverend Woody Fisher, Reverend
cameron Abell, and RevErend George Kemp who sere present to
rea~iv~ the re-elation, aa noted Reverend Clyde Abell
unable to attend the ~eet~nq.
WHEREAS, Deputy Sheriffs and their families can benefit
from coun~elinq and ~a~toral ministry; and
W~ERRAD; the Chaplains of'the Good News Jail and Prison
Ministry assists DeDuty Sheriffs and their families in times of
WHEREAS, the Good News ~all and Prison Ministry chaplains
dedicate their ~nergy and effort~ to mini~t~ to the various
W~R~AE~ =he Good News Ja~l and Prison Ministry Chaplains
diligently seek to "break the cycle of crime, one life at
time" throuqh ~/~eir tireless minis=ry in =be county Jail;
NOW, THE~LEPOR~ BE IT RESOLVED, that =he
County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes and commends the
outs~andinq service of the Good News Jail and Prison
Chaplains at the Chesterfield County Jail.
e~presses its apprecletion, on behalf of its citizens, to
Reverend Clyde Abell, Reveren~ Weedy Fisher, Reverend Cameron
Abell~ and Reverend George Kump for their dedication, interest,
and ~arti¢ipation in this vital and integral service to
Chesterfield County.
Pish~r, Reverend Abell, and Reverend Kunp who were present to
receive the re~olution ~nd expressed appreciation for their
dsdleation in such an integral service.
Stated Reverend Abell established this program, requested the
and stated it has been an honor, to metre. ~nmat~ in thm
(It is noted R~v~rend Abell'~ re,elation will b~ forwarded to
h~m.)
15.~. TO CON~I~ER THE PROHIBITION OF TKR~UOR TR~K OR
AND T~AILER OR E~MI-TRAILER OOMBINATIO~o EXCEPT
AND OLDE COACH DRIVE PROM HUGDENET RO~D TO P~T~qETON~
DRIVE
l~r. ~tith ~tated this date and time ha~ been advertised for a
traffic on Featherstone Drive, Warmln~ter Drive, and Olde Coach
Drive.
~u cna uamm forward to ~Deak in favor of or against this issue.
4/I0/96
96-260
on ~otlon of ~Lr. Barber, seconded by Mr. McHale, ~he Board
adopted the following resolution:.
WH~F~A~, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
received a request from oitizene to prokibit any through t~uck
or ~ck and trailer or semi-trailer combination except pickup
o~ panel t~oks f~om u~ing Feathe~tone D~ive (Route t~06) f~om
Hu~ot Road (Route 147) to Olde Coach Drive (Route 121~),
Wa~inster Drive (Route 1207) from Feathe~stome Drive (Route
~206) to 01d Buckingham ~oad (Route 677), and 01de Coach Drive
(Route 1~i0) from Hu~eno~ Road (Route IAT) to Feath~tom~
~S, the rec~ended alternate route is Huguenot
Road, Alverser D~ige, and Old ~uckingham Road; and
~S, ~ Bourd ha~ conducted u publi= hearing on ~
pr0hibiti~n.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, ~ha~ the Bonrd of
Supe~isorm requ~st~ the Virginia Department of Transportation
Wa~ins%~r Dr~ve, and Olde Coach Drive.
1S,B. TO CONSIDER THE PROHIBITION CE THROUGH TRUCK OR TBBCK
A/dD TRAILER OR ~EHI-TI~AILER ~0~dBINATION, ~X~PT
PICKUP OR PANEL TRUCKB ~ROMUSINO ME~DOWVILLE RO~D FROK
RI~B~ BE~. BOUL~ TO KING~TO~ AV~
Mr. Stith stated thi~ dat~ aha tim~ has been advertised for a
public hearing to con~ider the prohibition cf through truck
%raf~ic on ~eado~ille Road.
NO one came forward to speak.in favor of or again~t~is issue.
On mo=ion o~ ~r. ~oH~l~ ~oonded by ~. Barber~ the Board
~dopteO th~ following resolution:
~R~, the Chesterfield County Board of Supe~isors
or truck and trailer or s~i-trailer combination except pickup
or panel t~s from using Meado~ille Road (Route 618) from
R~ver'~ Bend Boulevard (Route 4540) to ~ingston Avenue (Route
4841]; and
~E~S~ the ~eoo~ended alternate ~oute is Rive~*~ Bend
Boulevard and Kingston Avenue; 2nd
WHE~S, the Board ha~ conducted a public hearing on the
prohibition.
NOW, ~EFO~ BE IT ~ESOL~D, ~at the Board of
Vote: Unanimous
COURTHOUSE RO~D
Mr. ~tlth ~tated th~ date and t~me ha~ been advertised for a
public hearin~ to consider the conveyance of right-of-way along
Courthouse
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against this issue.
96-261
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. ~arbsr, the Board
approved the conveyunc~ of a 1,606 squur= foot parcel of
to th~ Virginia Department o~ Transportation, and
the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator to
e~e~te the necessary deed. (It is noted a copy of the
vicinity ~ketch it filed with the paper~ of t/ai~ Board.)
Vote:
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the citizens of America ~njoy the frs~dom of
choice more than any ether nation on ~he face of the earth;
and
WHEREAS, with this f~eedom we
~ranted to us by the Constitution of the Uni~e~ Statem, the
right to fair and equal access to the housing 'of our choice;
WH~P~A~ the civil Righ=~ AC= of 1~68 prohibits
discrimination on ~e basis of race, color, religion, sex, and
national origin; and
~4ER~A~, thi~ protection wa~ ~xpa~ded by the Fair ~on~ing
Act Amendments of 1999 to ~nclude the hend~capped and fen~lles
with children in Virginia to further include the elderly as
protected classes; and
WHEREAS~ the Richmond Association of Rea~tors,
IncorDorated and the ~ational Association of Realtors have sst
aside time to celebrats the thsme "Fair Housing Opens Doors -
Realtors are the ~ey"; and
WHeReAS, fair and equal treatment ~s a fundamental right
of all our nation's citizens - a right Realtors support and
NOW~ T~EREFORE BE IT RESOLVED~ the= the Chesterfield
County Board of Sup~rvlsors hereby recognizes April 1-30, 1996
as "Fair ~ous~ng Month" and oo~end~ all those associated with
promoting equal housing opportunity in Richmond and the
Comnonwaal=h of Virginia and calls its significance to the
attention of all it~ citizen~.
Vote: Unanimou~
(It is noted no one attended the meeting to receive the
resolution and ~taff w~ll fei-warded the re~ol~tie~ to the
appropriate per~en.)
0~ ~etlon o£ Mr. MoHals, ~scondsd by Mr. Barber, the Beard
adjourned at 7:1~ p.m. until April 11, 1996 at 5:30 p.m. at the
Downtown Club for a legislative dinner.
Vote: Unanimous
4110/96
~6-~6~