04-24-96 MinutesApril 24, 199~
Mr. Parry ~. O&miel, Chairman
Mrs. Renny H. Humphrey
Mr. Lane B. Ramsay
staff in ~ttendanca:
Ms. Patsy Brown, Asst.
Dir., Accounting
Ms. Jana Carter, DIE.,
YOUth Se~vice~
Me. Marilyn Cole,
ASSt, to County Admit.
Ms. Faith L. Davie,
Clerk to the Board
chief Robert L. fanes, Jr.,
Fire Department
Mr. Michael Golden, Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. ~r&d~ord S.
Deputy Co. Admiu.,
Mr. Russell Harris,
County Ombudsman
~ir. Thomas E. Jacob~on~
Dir., Planning
Mr. Robert L.
Deputy Co. Admln.~
Mr. Richard M. McEtfish,
Dir., Env. Engineering
Public Af£airu
Dir., Budget &
Deputy CO. Admin.,
}ir. Fraderi¢~ Willi~, Jr.,
Dir., Human Resource Mgr.
Mr. Daniel called the rugularly mche~ule~ meeting to order at
2:00 p.m.
on notion of ~r. War,em, suconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved the minutes of April 10, 1996, as ~ubmit=ed.
Vote;
lit. Daniel r~qne~ted that tdheAgenda be amended at this time to
move to Item ~., Request to Postpone Action, Additions, or
Change~ in the Order of Presentation at this time in order to
ooodu~t a lengthy EXecutive Session helng added to th~ Agenda.
95-263
4. REOUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, ADDITIO~, OR
On motion of Hr. Mc~ale, ~cond~ by ~LT. Barber, the Board
added Item 7.B.2., Nomination/Appointment of Members to Serve
Con~truction of a New Juvenile Courtm Euilding~ added Item
7.C.8., Adoption of Resolution Requesting Grant Fun~s for
Con~tructlom of an A~ce~ Road and Design~tio~ of the New
Readway as a "Virginia Byway"; added Item 7.C.9., Authorization
fort he Parks and Recreation Department to Apply for Grants and
Appropriation cC Crant Fund= for Lake ches~in Park~ an4 a~ded
Item 9.D., Executive Session ~ursuant to Section 2.1-344A.1,
Code of Vimginia, 1950, as Amende~, to Discuss Candidates for
Police Chief a~d Pursuant to Section 2.1-344A.7, for
Consultation with the County A~torney Requiring Legal Advice on
the Appointment cf a Police Chief end adopted the agenda, as
amended.
Vote: Unanimous
DEP~/%TKEN~, UPON HER RETIREHE~T
~t~s. ~tsy ~rewn in~ro~uce~ ~Lrs. Elizabeth W. Wilburn who was
present to receive the resolution.
On motion of ~s Board, the following resolution was adopted:
~ER~S, Mrs. ~lizabeth W. Wilburn will r~tir~ on ~ay 31,
1996 after providin~ over tw~nty-~ix years of dedicated and
faithful ~ervice to Chesterfield County; and
W~R~$, Kr~. Wilburn began her public service wi=h the
co~y a~ a Secretary for the Utilities Department on October
1, 1968 wh~re she provided almost eight years of loyal service;
and
and dedication, pro~ressed from the position of Se=r~tary to
her ourr~nt position as a Payroll Acco~tant;
=hange8 i~ hut eight=un yeurm am Payroll Accountant including
partiQipating in the seleotion and cunversiun of ~wo n~w
payroll cyst=ms and seeing the County progress from a ~nual
payroll system where em~loya~ his~u~w=s ~cre~ on in,mx car~s
to the current sophisticate~ client-ms,vet ba~ed
management/payroll mystem; and
WEER~8, ~r~, wilbuzn grew wi~h ~hm County and
demomstrated vermmtility a~ the n~ber of full-tlme employees
in~reased from 400 =o ],400 and Payroll A~inis~ra~ion evolved
in=o a hiqhly s~illed and specialized
multitude of com91~ tax an4 ~nefit issues; and
~Za~, Mrs. wilburn was seleo~e~ as ~e Accounting
Department's ~ployee of t~e Yea~ in 1988, r~co~nizing her
~o~itment to doing w~atever is necessary for C~unty employees
to recpive acoura=e payche~s on ~ime; and
level cf customer ~e~vice when working with internal and
TQI ~nitiative Nithin the Accounting Depar~ent; and
~/~/~
WHEREAS, Mrs. Wilburn displayed a oaring attitude towar~
all of her customers~ oftsn goin~ out of her way to help those
in need, and de.castrated excellen~ tsa~work skills ~y always
being available to assist her coworkers and lending a helping
hand during difficult times; and
WIiEREA$, Mrs. Wilburn ha~ d~mon~tratod her loyalty to
Chesterfield Co~tythroagh her dedication and caring attitude;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Wilb~ sewed faithfully on the
Chesterfield Credit Union'~ Board of oireotor~ for mor~ than
twenty years; sDant numerous hours in 9romotinq and Dlanning
Board, ~acr~flclnq per~onal t~e to t~an~oTibe and type the
minut~ of the m=~ting~ so that they could be accurately
raport~d~ and se~6d on th~ Personnel oo~ittee fo~ much of
that time.
~OW~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, t~at t~a Chusterfi~ld
County Board of ~pervi~ors p~licly recognize8~s. Eliza~a=~
W. ~ilburn, extends their appreciation fo~ over twenty-six
~o~ her ~etirement, and thei~ be~t wishe~ for ~ long and happy
~retiremen~.
Vote: Unanimous
~r. Daniel an~ Mr. Ramsay pre,anted the execute~ resolution to
Mrs. W~lbu~n, accompanied by ~ husband and mother, expressed
wished h~= well i~ he~ ~tirement.
~tated ~h~ ha~ enjoyed h~ ~ervioe with t~e County.
5.~. R~COGNI$IN~ aPRIL 2~-27, 1996 A~ "VOLUNTEER ~RECIATION
WEEK"
Mr. Willi~ introduced Ms. Hiohelle caukins volunteer
Coordinator for the Lucy Corr ~ursing ~ome who was present to
r~oeive the resolution.
On motion of the Board~ the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, VOl~teers are community leaders in showing a
g~nulne self-sasrlflcing spirit tha~ ~enefits countless
indivlduuls; and
WHEREAS, volunteering i~ ~ecog~ized as an integral part of
governman= and industry in ccn=ributing =o ch~ acnieveanent~
that e~ance eu~ nation; and
~EAS, vol~tee~s Work together to enable u~ to meet the
goals of ~he organize=ion, thereby, increasing the quality
s~rvicx provided to citizens; and
~AS, volunteering can reinforce Homily value~ and
~EAS, volunteers show a personal interest in the needs
own; and
~EAS~ volunteers have contributed significantly to thc
quali=y of life in chesterfield county, in the co~onwealth,
and in the Nation.
9~-265
4/24/96
NOW, THEREFOR~ BE IT RESOLVED, that the ~hesterfield
County Boar~ of Supervisors hereby recognizes April 21-27, 1996
as "volunteer Appreciation Weak" in Chesterfield County and
urges all citi~en~ to honor volu~teer~ for %heir ~on%ribu~ion~
to t~e County.
vote: Unanimous
Mr. D~niel presented the executed re~olution to ~ Caukin~ a~d
expressed appreciation for her efforts in recognizing the
outstanding contributions of volunteers in the County, the
Commonwealth, and in the ~ation.
Lieutenant Arnold introduced Miss Laur~n Cunu~ings who was
On motion of tho Board, the following resolution was adopted:
invested in the recognition of youth who have made ~os~tive
~I~EREA~, Mi~ La~ren Cummings, a senior at clover Hill
High School, is th~ only student membe~ of th~ Drug and Alcohol
W~ERF~%~, Ei$$ Cummings i~ actively involvo~ in many facets
WI~REAS, Kiss Cuauninge a~vo0at~ and models u ~ug- and
alcohol-free lifestyle and is recognized a~ a leader by her
Deers; and
~R~$, ~iss Cu~ings attended the virginia Youth Alcohol
a~d D~g Abuu= Prevention Project ConSerence ms a youth
participan= in 19~3, a ~outh leader in 1994, and a junior staff
from virginia ~ig~ ~chool~ ~o ass~e Dositiva peer leadership
WEER~S, those selected demonstrated the highest level of
leadership skills and modeled the mo~t po~tive life~tyle~ and
attitudes of all the junior ~taff m~mb~r~; and
~ER~S, Miss C~ing~ was the only high school ~tudent to
receive ~is honor, as the ocher ~hree ~eleo=e~ were oollege
County ~oar~ of suDervisors publicly ruuognlzes M~sm Laur~
Cu~inq~ fo~ tko honor of being invited to serve as a junior
st~f~ faoili=a~or a= ~e 19~6 ~outh Alcohol and Drug Abuse
95-25~
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of th~
resolution be presented to Miss Cummings and that this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr, Daniel presented the excouted reseluticn to Ms. Cummings,
aooo~penled by her mother and Lieutenant~2~nold, congratulated
her on her outstanding achievements, and wished her well in her
f~ture e~deavnrs.
briefly described her involvement and exDerlenee in the
program.
WORK
On motion of F~c. MeHale, seconded by ~r. ~arber, the Board
&pp~oved the following streetlight installatie~ cost approvuls:
No cost to inatall light
* Stella Court, north ~ul-ds-sao. on the c~isting pole
No cost to install light
Due to special circumstances
* Stella Court, south cul-de-sac, on the existing pole
Co~t to in,tall light;
* Robious Road and Wr~n~ N~t Road
cost to install light: $5,429.?0
on motion of F~r. McHale, seconded by Far. Barber, the ~oard
suspended its r~les at thi~ tim~ to allow BiRultaneou~
nomination/appointment o~ u member ts serve on the
Comprehensive ~olicy and ~enagem~nt Team.
Vote: Unanimous
95-267
4124t96
on motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by M~s. Humphrey, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mm. ~ophia May~, providmr
~epresentative, to serve on =he Comprehensive Services Psl~oy
and ~anagemen~ Team, whose =arm is effective immediately and
will be at the pleasure of the Board.
Vote: Unanimous
7.B.2. AD .H~ STUDY CO~KISSION FOR THE FINANCING AND
CONSTR~CTION OF ~ N~W ~U?_EN. ILE.._CO~RTS..B~ILDIN~
After brief discussion, on motion of ~r. Barber~ ~econded by
Mrs. Humphrey, the Board deferred consideration of members to
serve un the Ad ~o~ Study Conmi~io~ for the financing
construction of a new juvenile ceurts building until May
1996.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of ~r. Barber, s~con~ed by ~r. Warren, the Board
adopted the following r~eolution:
~ffeets, whiQh are birth defects related to alcohol consumption
by pregnant women, can be prevented if pregnant women and women
qrowth retarda~isn, ~hysieal malformations, and Dsrmanent
central nervous system damage, including developmental delay~,
learning disabilities, and behavioral problems, and ~s most
having children with fetal alcohol sffsctm, which may include
peri, anent development delays, learning di~abilitie~, and
identifiable cause in the Un~t~d States of birth defects
acco~Dan~sd by mental retardation, amd ie the only preventable
W~EREAS, alcohol-related birth defects have enly recently
been discovered to Be a major health proble~ and many que~tionn
regarding them remain unanswered; and
W~ER~AS, the latest r~searc~h ~hQw~ ~a% children with
unable to live totally independ~nt, iives; ~nd
~EREAS, without exception, mother~ of infa~t~ bor~ with
~E~AS, the Surgeon General ha~ i~ued an advi~o~ that
County Board of ~upervi~or~ h~aby da~ig~at~ the week of ~ay
12-15~ 1995, an~ in each aucoeedlng year the wee~ that beginE
with Moth~r'~ Day, as Alcohol-R~lated Birth Defects Awareness
AND, BE IT FWRT~ER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield C~tLt~=y
Board of Supervi=ors urge the Co~onwealt/~'= =choel~, h~alth
care organizations and practitioners, and other public and
privets age~i~ to ob~$rve ~he week with appropriate
act~vlties and strongly encourage the c~t~zen~ ef Virginia to
learn about thi~ ~erious, an~ wholly preventable, condition an~
to take fil-m action towards its eradication.
?.D.l.b. ~AHING EALLFIELD ~1 A~ BENTLEY ~RK THE
"GR~J{~/{/DUNEEL~EB~ER MEMORIAL FTELD" ~ND ~u%LLFIELD
~2 THE "SCHAF~ER;~TEPHEMS M~ORIAL FIELD"
On motlen o[ ~r. ~arher, seconded by Mr. Warren, the ~oard
adopted th~ following re~olution:
belie~, many of whom lest their llveE; and
w~ose family ~e~ided on Pa~k Dale Road a~d who attended Chust==
High School, was killed in the Pacific in =his effort; and
WHEREAS, EN$ Theodore W. Dunkelberger, Navy Pilct~ whose
family moved to the Ben~ley eenm%unity in 1~40, was kille~ in
training off the Florida coast; and
WHEREAS~ PFC Joeeph Schaffer~ Infan~ryman~ whose family
resided on Swineford Road and who also at~ended Chester High
SchOol, Was killed in t~e Philippines in thi~ effo~t; end
WHEREAS, Sergeant Whitak~r B. Stephxns, B-17 bo~0ardier,
who~e £a~ily r~si~ed a~ Chcste~ Hill circle a~d who
Fork Union ~il~tary Academy, was killed in ~urope in thi~
offer=;
W~EREA$, these men bravely gave =heir live~ in the service
of our country; and
WHEREAS, a War Memorial, honoring the se~e of 8en~ley
~ommuni~y member~ in wnrk~ war II, wikl bn ~rncted at Bnn~lny
~ark on the ~Tth of May, 1996.
NOW, T~REFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chest~rfiel~
county Board of Supervisors hereby name~ Ballfield #1 at
Benslay Park tko "Graham/Dunkelberger Memorial Field and
Ballfield ~2 at Benslsy Park the "Sober,er/Stephens Memorial
Field*' in their m~mory.
Vote: Unanimous
95-269
S~PPORTINC DUPOI~T IN RECEIVIN~ STATE INDUETRIAL
ACCESS FUNDS FOR THE EXPANSION OF TEE NEW
SYTEL ~ER~TION AT THE SPRU;%NCE FACILITIES
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following rs~clution:
WHEREAS, DuPont ~a~ expressed its intent and desire to the
Chesterfield County Board of ~upervi~or~ to ~xpan~ itn
industrial operations in the County, which will involve a
capital investment of $30 million and create 66 job$~ and
WHEREAS, thin hu~in~s~ and its operations will require
tall access; and
W~EREAS, this railroad access is anticipated to p~ovid~ a
movement cf 1,~00 rail cars per year; and
WHEREAS, officials of DuPont have reported to the county
their intent to apply for Industrial Access Railroad Track
Funds from the commonwealth of Virginia, in the amount of
$149~000~ and
W~AS~ DuPont has requested that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors provide a resolution concerning support
for its applicstio~ for rail funds which are administered by
the Virginia Departmen~ of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of ~upervisors hereby endor=e~ and ~upport~ the
application cf DuPont for $149,QQQ in Industrial Access
Railroad Track Funds.
Vote: Unanimous
THE VIRGINIA BTATE DELEeATION TO REKOVE
T~ 199~ SENATE BILL $187 AND ROUSE RILL
AuTnORI~N~ T~E DEP~TMENT O~ COnSERVATiON ~
RECREATION TO L~ASE ~ROPBRTY AT POCAHONTAS STATE P~RK
TO ~ESTERFIE~D
On motion of ~r. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warr~, th~ Board
adopted the following ~ol~tion:
~ER~S, ~ Department of Conservation and Recreation,
seek development of programs and facilities to efficiently meet
~EREAS~ Chesterfield Coun%~ residents kave often, in the
past, demonstrated a particularly ~trong ~sire for
parti~i~atlon in active recreational pcog~am~ a~d ~e recent
public ~tlng concerning use of Pocahonta~ Stat~ park ha~
brought forward citizens who voiced ~upport for conservation of
State park lands and ~res~rva~iun of open spaces; and
~E~S, numeruus citizens have recognized the merlt~ of
~o~ the conservation of ~at~al resources and the development
State and County Dark~ and this should be an opportunity for
everyone to continue their partnership with th~ Department of
technical assistance to meet the growing an~ diverse
95-270
WI{EREASj there is the need for conversation and
~OW, T~R~FOR~ B~ IT R~S0L~D, ~ha~ the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisor~ hereby requests the State
delegation to r~move, from reconsideration for the 1997 ~enaral
Asxembly, the 1996 Senate Bill ~1S7 and House Bill #376
authorizing the Department of Conservation an~ Recreation to
lea~e property at Pocahonta~ ~tate Park to Ch~sterfleld County.
Vote: UnanimOUS
7.~.1.e. KECOG~IZIE~ APRIL ~9 - ~AY ~, 1996 AS '~OHESTERFIELD
C0UNTy.~O~T~..WEEK'%
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
~qIEREAE, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
recogn~z~ th~ n~d for positive and h~althy youth d~v~lop~nt
in Chesterfield County; and
~K~EREAS, the Board of Supe~vi~o~ e~eated the Youth
Servlcez citizen Board to advocate for youth for
conditions in the community to promote the well being of young
WHEREAS, the Youth Ssrvioe~ citizen Boars araw~ on =he
extraordinary talents, commitment, and dedication of youth and
concerns of our young people; and
~R~A~, th~ Board reco~niz~n the ef~ort~ Of th~ Youth
se~io~s ci~is~n Board and th~ Chesterfield County Kiwanis
Clubs to stimulate constructive youth development
activities through their sponsorship of the 1996 Co,unity
~=R~AS, =he Chesterfield co,unity m~knowledges the
accomplis~ents and needs of its young people.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Sup~rv~or~ of Chesterfield County h~by recognizes Apri~
to May 5, 1996 as "Chesterfield County Youth We~k" and further
r~=ogni~s April $0, 1996 a; %h~ "Annual Community xou~
chesterfield county and ~ay 2, ~996 as =he "Thirteenth Annual
YOUth Awards Niqh=" to ~ono~ outstandin~ young people f0~ t~ei~
courage, compassion, and ~ervioe to the oo~uni~ and
outstanding ad, its fo= their fortitude, s=nsitivity, and
service to young
Vote: Unanimou~
q.~.l.f. RE~O~NT~ING APRIL 15-19~ 1996 ~S "N~TTO~TA~ CREDIT
EDUCATION WEEK"
On motion of ~r. ~arber~ sessnde~ ~y ~r. Warren{ th~ ~oard'
ad0pte~ th~ following re~olution:
~q{EREAE, understanding the nature of credit, its cost, and
benefits is necessary if our citizens are to realize the full
b~nefit~ of their income~ and
WHh~R~AS, the ~iss~mination of informa~ion regarding credit
95-~71
NOW~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chaaterfield
County Board cf Bupervisors hereby presents this resolution to
CPI: Credit Professionals of Richmond$ Virginia, iD recoguition
es "National Credit E~uoatlen Weak", April 15-19, 1996.
Unanimous
LENSE WITH ~OR~NER INStKIt~N~R ~ENOY,
INCORPO~J~T~D~J~DCE[~RLRS mORNER PeR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
extend the lease for ei~ty Oay~, at the ~eque~t of the tenant
of the property.
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by ~r. Warren, the Beard
approved a lease with Homer Insurance Agency, Incorporated and
Charles Hornet for office space located at 100~l Ironbridge
Road~ for an additional 60 days, and authorized the Chairman of
the Board and the county Administrator to execute the necessary
lease. (It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed
with the papers of this Board.)
FUNDS FOR .TREE RF~(OV~L IN THE WOODKOET SUBDIVISION
on motion of ~r. Barber, ~econded b~ Mr. WaTre~, %~ B0ar~
appropriated $1,200, in Midlothian District Three Cent Road
PunKs, to be transferred to the Environmental Engineering
Department, for tree removal in th~ Woodmont Subdivision.
Vote: Unanimou~
TO ~LY FOR A ~RA~T AND A~ROPRiATiON OF GRANT FUNDS
FO~ ~ONSTRUCTION OPA BOAT SLIDE AND FISHIW~ PIER
S~7PPORTIN8 TEE TWO PROJEUTB
On motion of Mr. Barber~ ~eoonded by Mr. Warren, the Board
anthoriz~d the ~ark~ and ~screation Department ~o apply for
grant, in the a~onnt cf $150,000, for construction of a boat
slide ~nd fiuhlng pier a~ Robious Landing Park; appropriate~
grant~ flk~d~ ~p to $1~O,OO0, upon award of the grants; and
adoptod the following resolution:
WH~EAS, in accordance with Virginia Department of Game
and ~nland Fisheries allocation procedures for grants to
looallties for boating access and ~iehing pier projaota, ~t is
necessary that the local governing body ~do=se all p~oposed
proje=ts in i~s jurisdiction.
NOW, TH~REFORE BE IT RZSO~VaU, that ~he Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County ~equests the Department of
Game and Inland ~isheries id establish a $100,000 grant for the
construction of a public beat ~lide and a$$0eiated parking and
a $50,~00 grant for the construction of a public fishing pier
at Rebious Landing Park in northern Ch~ot=rfield County.
~ND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board, having
previous authorized Cheeterfield County to' en=~r in~c an
agreement with Ea~le COnStruction for the development of t/aim
site and having accepted a $120,000 donation from
constructio~ fo~ the development of thi~ site to be u~ed in
part for the require~ 25 ~eroent match for this project,
4/24/96
95-272
expresse~ their support for the construction of a boat slide
and fishing pisr at Robicus Landing Park in the interest of
providing public recreational access to t he Jamus River for
the benefit and enjo~ent of all County residents.
Vote: Unanimous
~.C.~. REQUEST FOR BIN~O/RAFFLB PERMITS
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warrsn, the Board
approved the following b~ngo/raffle p~rmlts for ealend&r year
1996:
Orqanization TVDe
Cavalier Athletic Club Bingo
winfree Memorial Preschool Raffle
Cho~terfisld Alu~nas
Delta Sigma There Sorority Raffle
Marguerite Christian Elementary
School PTA Raffle
Vote: Unanimous
7.O,~. RSOUESTS FOR PERMISSION
ooDstru~t a ~arri~ade withi~ ~n ~nimprov~ right-of-way known
as Ow~ndal~ Road, subject to the execution of a license
agreement. (it is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed
with the papers of this Board.)
~ DRIVIN~RE~ ~NCRO&CH W~T~N~N~.I~TIN~..SIXTEEN
On motion of ~r. ~arber, seuon~ed by ~r. Warren, ~he Boar~
approved a request f~om Econo Lube and Tune to have a concret=
~arkin~ and driving area encroach within an existing sixteen
foot uewer easement, subject to th~ execution of a license
agreement. (It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed
~ith the papers of t/~is Board.}
Vote: Unanimous
7.~.6.~. FROM OHARTER HOMES TO HAVE A DE~K ENCROACH WITHIN~N
On motion of Mr. Darb~r, ~oonded by Mr. Warren, the Board
approved a request from Charter Homes to have e deeR' enoro~c~
within an existing sixteen foot drainage easement, subject to
the e~ecution of a license agreement. (It is noted a ~opy of
Vote: Unanimous
9§-273
REOUEST TO AID M~RFA ~%ID DAIRY IN THE ACOUISITION OF
SEWER ~S~M~NT_.~D..T~M~OR~RY ~ON~TRUCTION EA~EKENT
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
authorized the Department o£ Right-oK-Way ge aid Marva Maid
Dairy in the acquisition of a sewer easement and temporary
construction easement across property of siva K. R. and vijaya
L. Gars, subject to the execution of a contract by Matra Maid
Dairy agreeing to Day far all costa. (It io noted a copy of
the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION REOUESTING ORAN~ FUR-DS FOR THE
CONOTR~TION OP~N~C~ES~ R~E TO L~X~C~I~SD~N ~J~D
DESIGNATION OF TRE N~ ROADWAY ~S
On matie~ of Mr. Darber~ seconded by Mr. Warren~ the Board
authorized the Park~ and Routes=ion Department to apply for
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) grant funds, up to
$$50,000, for construction of the access road ~o Lake
Park~ and adopted the following r=solution:
WHEREAS, the Lake Chasdln Park is owned and is to be
~eveluped by the County of chesterfield as a recreational
fac~llty ~erving the ~esidents of Chesterfield County and
W~EREAS, the facility is in need o~ adequate
WHEREAS, the right-of-way cf the ~rcpcsa~ access is
provided by the County of Chesterfield at no cost to the State;
and
W~EREAS, the procedure governing the allocatlcn of
recreational access fund~ a~ set forth i~ SeotioD
Code of Virginia 19s6, as amended, reguire~ joint actlon by the
Highway and Transportation Board; and
W~EREAS, the Board of Sup~rvi~orn of Cha~terflel~
has duly adopted a zoning ordinance pursuant to A~t~ole
(Section 1~.±-~6 et ~eq.), Chapter 11, title 1~.1; and
and Historic Resources to designate Lake Chesdin Park as a
recreational facility and further permit the Virginia Highway
and Transportation Board to p~ovi~e funds for aece~ to thi~
agrees, that in keeping with the intent cf Section ~3.1-6~, to
u~e its good office ts reasonably protect the aesthetic or
¢~ltural val~e cf this road:
4/~4t96
95-274
~QW~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, =hat the Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County hereby reque~t~ the Director
of Conservation and Kistcrie Resources to daslgnate the Lake
Chesdin Park as a public recreation area; and to recommend to
the State Highway and Transportation Board that recreational
access funds be allocated for an access road to serve said
Park.
A~D~ BE IT FURTHER RESOL%-ED, that the virginia Highway amd
Transportation Board is hereby repuested to allocate the
necessary recrsatlanal access funds to provide a suitable
access road as hereinbefore described.
Veto: Unanimous
~UTHORIZ~TION ~0~ THE P~RK~ AND RECREatiON ,DEP~RTMENT
TO A~LY FOR GRANTS AND APi~O~RIATE GRANT
authorized the Parks and Recreation Department to apply for a
$100,~00 grant for conetruction of a boat ramp and a $50~000
fro~ the Virginia Department of oame~ and Inland Fisheries;
with the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries to
administer the grants; and adoptud the following resolution:
W~RF~%~, in accordance ~ith Virginia D~partment of Game
and Inland Pieheries allocation procedures for grants to
localities for boating access and fishing pier projects, it ie
projects in its juriedlctlon.
~OW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, ~hat the Board of
Supervisors of chesterfield County ~equests the Department of
a $~Q,QQQ grant for the con,true:ion cf a public fishing pier
cheeterfield county,
construction of a boat ramp and fishing pier at Lake Chesdin
Park in the interest of 9rovld~ng Duhl~c recreational access to
Lake Chesdin for the benefit and enjoyment of all County
(It is noted that upon approval of the ~rants, the Board is
authorizing the County Administrator to appropriate, up to
$150,000, in anticipated State reimbursement funds.)
8. H~INGS OF ¢ITI~S._ON. UNSCHEDDLED MATTERS OR ~LAIM~
Th~r~ were no ~arin~s of citizens on un~chedule~ Ma~ters or
Claims scheduled at t~is time.
95-275
~,
0n mstion of Mr. MoHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
A report on Developer Water and Sewer Contract~ and a ~tatu~
report on the General Fun~ Balance; Reserve for Future capital
Projectm; District Road and Street Light Funds; Lease
And, f~ther, the Board accepted the following roads into the
Route 9770 ($.G, El~ent~ry School Access Road) -
From Route 2307 to 0.0g mile Northeast Route
2307 via loop O,~
STON~ENGE - ~ffectiv~
WARE BOTTOM SPRINGS DRIVE - (Effective 3-6-96)
Route 89s (Ware Bottom Springs Drivx} - From
0.29 mile ~or~hw~st RouCe 7~2 ~c Route 10 0.14
BAILEY BRIDGE ~IDDLE SCHOOL - (Effective 3-5-96}.
Rou=e 9974 (Bailey Bridge Middle School Accmmm
- From Route 6~4 to 0.67 mile Scutheamt Route 654
via loops 0.67 Mi
B~TY WOODSON W~VER ELEMENT~Y SCHOOL
Route 9972 (B~tty Woodmen Weaver El~entnry School
AQce~ Road) - From Route 3987 ~o 0.47 mile
Northwest Route ~387 via loop 8.47 Mi
~RVER MIDDLE SCHOOL
Rou=e 9973 (carver Middle sohool Access Road) -
From Route 6~ to 0.15 mile Northwest Rout~
via loop 0.15
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY INDUSTRIAL P~ - ~Effective 3-15-96)
t~ Rou$~ 947 0.~7 Mi
Route 947 (Redplne Road) - From Rou=e 701
Route 948 0+16
Ro~te 701 (~itepine Read) - From 0.04 mile
Not.west Route 737 to 1.0Z mile East Route
651 0,700 Mi
~R~ EL~E~TARY $~OOL - {Effective 3-5-96)
Rout~ 9970 (Evergreen Elementa~ School
Road) - From Route ~970 to O.~5 ~il~
Route 3970 via loops O.45 Mi
4t24/96
J.'G. HENNING ~LEM~NTARY SCHOOL
Route 9770 (J.~. Elementary Suhccl Access Road) -
From Soukh Route 3259 to North Route 32S9 via loop 0.17 Mi
J~0~$ ROAD ~L~NTARY SCEOOL
Route 9976 (Jacobs Road Elementary School
Road) - From Route 763 and Route 882 to 6.15 m~le
~ertheast Route 763 and 0.14 mile ~orth Route 852
v~a leopm 0.39 Mi
~L%NCRE~TRR ~I~ SCHOOL ACCESS ROAD
Fro~ Ro~t~ 654 ~o 0,34 mile Mast Route 654
via loop~ 0.34 Mi
RIVER RIDGE. STCTION D - (~ffecti~e
Route ~377 (Riverpark Terrace) - From Route
to 0.19 mile We~t Route 4350 0.19 Mi
Route 4~50 (Riverpark Way) - From Route 4368 to
e.21 mil~ ~r~hwest Rout~ 4~6~ 0.21 Mi
~ALI~UI~Y, ~ATFI~LD ~T~OM, D~A~ ~ - (Effective
Route Z796 (Helmsley Roa~) - From 0.03 mile
Southwest Route 3799 to Route 3788 0,17 Mi
Route 3788 (Kermont Drive) - Prom 0.08 mile
STON~ILL CREEK - (=~ective
~outh Route 2718 to 0.12 mile South Route 2718 0.02 Hi
T~F~ CR~NS~W ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - (Effective 3-5-96~
Route 9975 (Thelma Crenshuw Elementary ~chool
Access Roa~) - Fro~ Route 654 a~d 651 go O,13
mile ~ortheaat Route 6~4 and 0.t7 mile
Route 651 wi~ loops O.~O
Vo~e: U~an~mou~
~s. H~p~ey recognized the wearing of blue ribbons by ~aoh of
~e Board me.em and noted th~ ribbon~ are b~ng worn on
behalf of April, 1996 beinq recognized as "child
Prevention Month."
· .D. EXECUTI~-E ~ESSION (I),,R.~.S~.AI~ TO S~CTtON ~.1-344A.1..
C~IDATES FOR ~OLICE CHIE~ AND ~Z} PURSUIT TO SE~ION
REQUIRIN~ L~ ~DVI~E ON THE APPOI~ME~ OF A POLI~E
into ~xecutive Zession (1) ~rsuant to Section
Code of Virginia, 1950, as ~ended, to Discuss Candldatem for
~oliQe ~i~f and (~) ~muant to Section ~.1-344A.7. for
Consultation with the County Attornay Requiring Leqal Advice on
the Appointment of a ~olice Chief.
V~te: Unanimous
95-277
It was the general cons~n~u~ of the Board to adopt the
following resoi~tion:
W~EREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Executive Session in accordance with a £ormal vote of the
Board and in ascendance with the p~ovi~ion~ of the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act; and
WHER~A~ the Virginia ~reedom of Information Act eff~utiv~
July 1, 1989 provides for certification that such Executive
session was con4uc%e~ in conformity with law.
NOW, THEREFOP~E BE IT RESOLVED, %he Board of Su~ervisors
does hereby certify that to the best of each m~3~be~'~
knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted
from open m~=ting requirea~ent~ under the Freedom of Info--orion
Act were discusse~ in t-ha ~x~eutive $~ssien to which this
certification applies, and
ii) only such public business matters as were identified
heard, discusse~, or considered by the Board. No member
dissents from this certification.
It was the general consensus of the Board to recess from the
~x~eutiv~ ~es~ion to ~eet with the ~olunteer ~ire Chie£s for a
dinner meeting and to reconvene the Executive Safelon at the
end of the evening session of the Age,da.
1~. DINNER
I~ was the general comsensus of the Bca~ to recess to the
Administration Building, Room ~02, for a dinner meeting the
Volunteer Fire Chiefs.
Vote: Unanimou~
M~ Daniel welcomed everyone tc the meeting and intr~duction~
were made of those present.
The c~eeter£iel~ County vol~tee~ Fir~ chiefs ~et With the
Board of Supervisors for a dinner meeting amd District Chief
~rancis A. Miller, of ~e Mi~lotnian Fire Department, presented
a~ overview of 1~95 volunteer cperation~ including fire
responses; emergency medical services ~caponse calls~ the
nunnber of certificution~ for ~haerg~ncy ~dical Tecbna~cianm,
~me~gency ~e~ical Defibrillation Technicians, an~ First
Re,ponders; and safety performance. ~e noted Department
injuries in 1995, Der 100 alarms, was the lowest rate ~n
sixteen years. He acknowledged the Board of Supervisors
cen~inued support and int~res~ in the Fire Departmen~ and
stated the Volunteer District Chief~ are proud to be an
integral Dart of an organization w~io~ is widely recognized for
ilknowation, profcsuionulism, and superior emergency services.
He =hen reviewed budget issues a~d requests, i~ prioriUy order,
i~cl~dinq funding for apparatus replacement; f~ding for the
reDlacement oS eight ~aa=t defibrillation units; funding Sot
volunteer call ~ense reimbursement; f~ding for 7~ alertin~
pagers; an~ ~un~in~ for th~ ra~ac~ent of s~uad Unit 55 at
Midlothian Fir~ Rtation.
timeframe in which the defibrillators are needed; the request
to replacement Squad Unit 55 at Midlothian Fire Station boin9
cn the fleet replacement schedule; the defibrillatorE being
identified at this time; and whether options are available, at
thio time, that would allow for the purchase of the
defibrillators.
Mr. R~msey expressed appreciation for ~h~ opportunity to meet
with the Fire Chief~. He then adk~ewledged the close working
relationship, between chie~ EenEs and the Volunteer Fire Chiefs
chiefs deserve recognition for their ~fforts.
Chief EanoE EtatEd that the professionalism within the County
volunteer firofight~r$ and expressed a~reciation for t~e joint
partnership.
Chief Dolezal pre~ent~d a gold Fire Department badge to Mrs.
Department.
Mr. HcHale seated the joint partners~iD of firufighting and
It was generally agreed to recess to the Public Memting Roo~ to
continue the regularly scheduled Beard ~ting.
~mconvening:
Mr, Daniel Stated the Board cf Supervisors recemSed £UO~ ~n
~xe~tive $~ssio~ Pur$~an~ %o Section ~.1-344A.1~ Code of
Virginia, ~950, a~ ~ended, to Discuss Candidate~ for Police
chief and ~ursuant to Section 2.1-344A.7, for Consultation with
the County Attorney Requiring Legal Adv~c~ on the Appointment
of a Police Chief, in the Administration Building, and will
reconvene to that Executiv~ Semmi0n following Item 15.,
Requests for Mobile Home Permits and Rezening in the E~ecutive
S~s~on Room.
~Z. I~VOCATION
Reverend Bale Turner~ Paoto~ of Point of Rocks Baptist Church,
gav~ tho invcuation.
12. FLEDGE O~ ~LL~GI~N~E TO T~L~G...OF TEE UNITED STATES
AM~ICA
Mr. Joh~ Lanier, Jr., a Friends of t~e Library 25t~ Anniversary
Essay Contest Winner, led the ~ledge of Allegiance to t~e Flag
of the United StateE of America.
~_~__._~: R_~_C_O_~_~T_~_T.~_FR.I.~NDS OF THE LIBRARY ESS]%¥ ~ONT~gT WINNgRg
Nr- Masden introduced Ms. Kathryn Garanioe, Coordinator of the
Youth Experience success Pre~a~ at Swift ~ree~ Middle School
and a reviewer for the English Journal, who was pr~se~= ~o
introduce Friends of the Library ~msay Contemt winners.
95-279
support. She then introduced the Elementary School Division
winners including ~ir. ~ohn Lanier, Jr., Third Place winner
representing LaPrade Library; Miss Ashley Hall, Second Place
winner representing Clever ~ill Library; and Mis~ Cameron
Buughn, First Place winner representing Clover Rill Library.
she then introduced the Hiddle seheol Division winners
including Miss Nicole Cease, Third Pla~e winner representing
the central Library~ Second Place winner representing
Meadowdale Library; and Mr. Themes Roberts, First Place winner
representing ~idlothian Library- ~h~ then introduced the High
School Division winners includingMr. Josh Cloudt, Third Place
winner representing ~he Central ~ibra~y; Miss $odi Lynn Bowen,
Shauna Williams-Farrell, First Place winner representin~ Clever
efforts and congratulated them on their accomplishment,
with s check, on behalf of the Friends ef the CheSterfield
County p%%blio Library.
subject of ~an cruelty in which her essay was written about.
~s. Al~nia ~ilder, Director of Secendary Education, introduced
Ms. Dana Ritohie, representing Hidlethian High Soho01, end,tr.
John Hilliard~ representing Janes River High School~ who were
pre~en~ to receiv~ the resolutions.
On mo~ien sf ~he Beard, %he following rasuleti0n was adopted:
W~EREA$, the ~wo highes~ risk nights ~u$ teens are prom
and graduation, with some parents seeming to oondone parties
an~ drug-fr~e par%i~ for ~tudents; and
W~R~, many parent~ of Jame~ River High School ~uniors
workinq to provide alternati~ "no 51cobol or ~gs"
following ~e Midlothian High School Pram on May 11, 1996
the James River High School Prom on May 18, 1996; and
~ER~S, c~unlti=s all ove~ Virginia are reaching in
County Board of Supervisors declares the weekends of May 11-12,
Teen and Adult Population of Chesterfield County."
95-2~0
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, ~at a~ults be encouraged to
provide a positive, no alcohol and drugm e~ample for our youth,
particularly a~ the high risk times of prom and graduation, in
an effort that we not only chang~ lives, but save them.
Vote: Tnmnimous
Mr, bani-1 pre~ted the executed resolutions to Ms. Ritchie
and Mr. John Hilllard~ commended pa~ent~ and school staff for
their efforts in providing a no alcohol and drugs alternative
for students at the times of prom and graduation.
Mr. Hilliard expressed appreciation for the recognition.
14.
There were no Public Hearings scheduled at this lime.
· $. MZO~STS FOR MOBIL~
of Mobile Home Permit 89SR0~49 to park a mobile home in a
General Bu$ines~ (C-~) District. The dun~ity o~ this proposa~
is approximately ~.1 units per acre. The comprehensive Plan
d~signates the property for
located approximately 3Z0 feet off the ~suth lima of Ruffin
Mill Road, from a point approximately 790 feet southeast
Woods Edge Road and better known as 2201 Ruffin Mill Road. Ta~
Map 149-B (1) Parcel ~6 (Sheet 41).
years, subject tc standard conditions. Ha noted tho mobile
mr. Ami1 Pate1, representinq ~he applicant, state~ the
following conditions:
mobile home.
rental proper~y. Only one (1} mobile home shall be
permitted to be parked on an individual lot or parcel.
The minimum lot size, yard setbacks, required front yard,
district shall be complied with, except that no mobile
home shall be located tlc&er than 2~ feet to any existing
4, No additional p~rmanen~-typc living space may be added
but shall not be placed on a permanent foundaciun.
5. hlle~e public [County) water ~nd/or sewer ara uva~lable,
they mhall be umed.
4/24t96
vote:
Upon being granted a Kobile Home Permit, the applicant
shall then obtain the Necessary permits from the office of
the Building Official. Thi~ shall be done prior to'the
inotallatien er relocation of the ~c~ile home.
Any violation of the above conditions shall be grounds for
renewal of Mobile Home Permit 89SR0131 to park a mobile home in
a Remidentiel (R-7) Diotrict. The density of this proposal ie
approximately 1.43 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan
~e~ignate~ t~e property for residential u~e of 2.51 to 4 units
per aero. This property is located approximately 650 feet off
the southeast line of Omaha Street, from e point approximetely
200 feet sout/%east of Normandale Avenue and is hett~r known as
8932 La--dale Street. Tax Map 81-8 (1) Parcel 2 (Sheet 23).
tho ~lanning Commission and staSS recommends approval for seven
homes ie lose=ed in an area designs=ed by the Jeff.er~9~ Davis
Corridor. Plan.
Ms. Mammie Sayles stated the recontmendation is acceptable.
following conditions:
1. The applicant ~hall be the owner mud occupant of the
2. No let er parcel may be rented er leased for use as a
mobile home site, no~ shall any mobile home be used for
rental property, only one (1) mobile home shall be
pe~mitted to be pa~ked on an individual lot or parcel.
The minimum lot ~ize, yard setbacks, requi~ed front yard,
and other zoning requirements of tbs applicable zoning
home shall be located closer than 20 Iset to any existing
residence.
4. No additional permanent-type living space may be added
onto a mobile home. All mobile homes shall be ekirtsd
but shall not be placed on a permanent foundation.
5. Where public (County) water and/o~ ~ewe~ are available,
they ~hall be used.
6. Upon being granted a Mobile Moms P~rmlt, the applicsnt
the Huildlng Offlm~al. This shall be done ~rior to the
installation or relocation of the mobile home,
revocation of the Mobile Home Permit.
Vote: Unanimous
4/24/~¢
95-2fl2
In ~atoaca ~agtste~£al District, THE C~ESTE~IELD COUNTY BOAR~
OF ~UP~RVISORS requ~ted Conditional Use to permits group care
faeillty in an Agricultural (A) District. The density of such
amendment will b~ controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for
residential u~ on 1 to ~ acre lots, Thi~ r~quest lies on 26.8
acres fronting approximately 750 feet on the east line of River
Road, also fronting in two (2) places for a total of
approximately 1,350 feet on the south line of Reedy Branch
Road, and locate4 in the southeast ~uadrant of the intersection
of these reads. Tax ~ap 14~-1~ (1) Parcel 1~ (Sheet
Mr. Jacobsen presented a ~ummary of Ca~e 9SSN0163 and stated
the Planning Commission and ~taf~ rmcc~en~ approval subjeot to
appearance compatible with =he existin~ structure on
Parcel 23 of Tax Map 144-1~ (1). Compatibility shall
achieved through the use of similar buildinq massing,
~t~rial~, s~al~ or oth~r architectural features. The
architectural style shall be approved by the Planning
Department at the time of site plan review.
2. The residential structures shall be limited to no more
than three (3) buildings. Each building ~hall
to accu~odatm a maximum of four (4) dwe11ing un,ts. The
buildings ~hall be clu~tered o~ t~e P~opurty. (P)
Agricultural (A) zoning and condi~ion~ h~reln are more
of the zoning ordinance for Residantial ~ul=i-~umily (R-
MF) Diutrictu. (P)
4. A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
adjacent to Parcels 10, 11, 17, 21 ~nd 22 on Tax Map 144-
the Zoning O~dinance for fifty (~0) foot buffers,
5, Exoep~ for ~imbering approved by the Virginia State
Dep~rtment of Forestry for the purpose of r~oval of dead
Property until a l~nd ~isturbance permit ha~ been obtained
approved devices have been installed.
6. Prior to any site plan approval, forty-fiv~ (4~)' feet'of'
right of way on the ~outh ~ide of Reedy Branc~ Road and on
the east side of River Road, meas~ed from =he centerlines
of ~at pa~t of the roads i~ediately adjacent to the
and for th~ b~nefit of ~sterfield County. (T)
Vote: Unanimou~
95-283
4/24/96
In Midlothian Magisterial District, ~OOREFIELD IV, L.C.,
VIRgiNIA LIMXTED LI~BTLTTY COKPANY requested amendment to
conditional Use Planned Devslopment (Case 82S039) to permit
private college and business school use in a Corporate Office
(O-2) District. The ~en~ity of such amendment will be
eoatrolled by zoning conditions or Ordinanc~ standards. The
Comprehensive Plan deslgnate~ the property fo= office use.
This request lies on 7.3 acres fronting approximately ~00 feet
on the east line and approximately 700 feet on the west line of
Moorefield Park Drive, so~th Of ~idlothian Turnpike. T&~ Map
17-15 (1) Parcel 6 and Tax Map 17-16 (1) Parcel 18 (Sheet
~. Jacobsen presented a summary of Case 96SN0199 and stated
the Planning Commission and staff recommen~ approval and
acceptance of proffered conditions. He n0te~ the request
¢0~form~ to the Northern Area...~aDd Use and Transportation P~an.
Mr. Ch~ek Rothe~ber~ ~tated the recommendation is acceptable
with the clarification the= the applicant intends to apply the
two proffered conditions to any development on the mnbject
property, regardless of whether ~ sit~ i~ used as a private
college or not. ~e submitted into the ~eosrd a copy of a
conditions. When asked, he stated the letter is not ~equasting
that an addlt~onal condition be added, but i~ only a statement
of position and clarification that he would like i~clude~ ~n
the record.
There was no opposition ~rssen%.
~r. Daniel noted %he letter ~ only a statement of position and
clarification that will be in~luded as part of the record.
Mr. Darber stated that all discussions that have take~ place
prior to this evening, stipulated tha~ ~he conditions o~ the
applicant were going to be ~onditions that would be used,
regardless of the development being an office building or
school. He further stated the advertisement for this request
was a little more restrictive than other requests, therefore,
the County Attorney reooi~mends that, to be consistent, the
mtaff~ position will be that the conditions only a~ply to the
property wit~ the development of tbs sc~hool. ~e stated the
applicant has contacted representatives from the adjacent
neighborhood and explained this pesi~isn an~ that all parties
proffered conditions:
1. A~y building ~on~tructed on Parcel 17-15 (1) 6 shall
contain cna or mere, but not necessarily a11, of the
brick;
~, windows wit3a divided llght~; and/or
4. punched window openings.
standard
Any one-~tery building constructed on Parcel 17-15 (1) 6
shall be setback a minimum of seventy-five (7~1 fe~t from
the west and south line~ cf Parcel 17-15 (1) G.
95-284
(NOTE: ~hese proffered conditions apply to any private
college or business school ~se~ however, at the hoard of
Supervisors' meeting, the applicant indicated his intent
to voluntarily apply them to all other uses permitted by
Casa ~2S039.}
vote: Unanimous
In Bermuda Magisterial District ~TE KOBIL~T reql%ested a
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a 285 foot
communications tower in an Agricultural (A) District. The
density of au~h amendment will be controlled by zoning
conditions or Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan
designates the property for general industrial use. This
request lies on 0.3 acres fronting approximately 12 feet on the
east line of Allied Road, approximately ~,800 feet ~oufh of
Bermuda Hundred Road, Tax ~ap 136 (1) Pa~t of Paruel il (Sheet
the Planning co~ission and s=a£f r~oo~end aD, reval subjec= to
lceatienal criteria for towers as outlined in the County'~
~ubllc Facilities ~lan and that the request conforms to the
Eastern Area Land u~e and Trana~ortatioa
~r. Andrew Conlin, representing the applicant, stated the
recommendation is acceptable. There was no opposition
Mr. McHale entered into the record a letter from Mr. Conlin
regarding some of the concerns raised at the ~lanning
Commission meeting and that he realm the applicant haz
~atisfied those concerns.
On motion of Mr. McKale, seconded by ~r. ~arber, the ~eard
approved Case 968N0171 subject to the following eonditions~
1. The base of the towe~ s~all be enclosed by a minimum six
(~) foot high fence, designed to preclude trespassing.
detailed plan depicting this requirement shall be
submi=ted to =he Planning Departmen= ~cr ~pproval in
conjunction with final site plan review. (~)
copy of FAA approval shall ~s suhmltted to th~
D~pa~tment.
3. T~e tower and equipment ~hall be d~zi~ned and installed so
as not to in=effete w~th =he ches=erfi~l~ county public
Safety T~unked System. The developer shall p~rform an
engineering study to determine the possibility of radio
frequency interference with the County system, ~rior to
release of a building permit, the study shall be submitted
to, an~ appreve~ by, the Chesterfield county
Communications and ~lectrnnia~ ~taff.
4. The developer shall be responsible for correcting any
frequency problem~ which affect th~ Chesterfield County
Public Safety Trunked System caused by this use, Such
corrections shall be made iemediate~y upon notification by
the chesterfield county Communications and Electronics
staff.
95-285
5. The color and lighting system for the tower shall be as
fullow~:
a. The tower shall be gr~y or another n*utral color,
acceptable to the Planning Department.
b. If lighted, lighting during daylight hours shall be
limited to medium intensity strobes with upward
reflection and lighting durin~ night-time hours
shall be limited to soft blinking lights. (P)
6. Ail driveways and parking area= shall be graveled or paved
and maintained to minimize dust problems and provide ease
of ingress and egress.
7. Any building or mechanical equipment shall comply with
Section 21-1-~$ of the Zoning Ordinance relative to
architectural treatment of building ex~eriors and
screening of mechanical equipment.
(~OT=: This condition would require the screening of
meonanioal e~uipment located on =he building er ground
from adjacent properties and public rights of way.
mounted equipment.)
~. At ~u~h time that the tower cea~e~ to be used for
communications purposes for a period c×cesding twelve (12)
consecutive months, the owner/developer ~hal~ dismantle
and remove the tower and all a~seclated e~ulpment from the
property. (P)
9. in conjunction with the approval of thi~
foot exception to the 150 foot height limitation for
towers shall be granted.
Vote: Unanimous
96SN~179 and 96PD0195 (Amended)
In Matoaca Magisterial District, ~CB ~KIHECO - JO~N ~END~
requested Conditional Use to permit a 150 ~oot communications
tower in an Agricultural (A) District. Further, the applicant
is appealing the Planning Commission' s decislcn relative to
Substantial Ac=etd Determination. The density of ~uch
amendment will ba cont~olledby zoning conditions or ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan deslgn~tes the property for
residential use of 1.51 to 4.0 units per acre an~ for
public/semi-public use. This request lies on ~0.45 acre~
fron:ing ~n two (2) places for a =c~al o~ up~roximately 280
feet on the west line of Courthouse Road, acro~s fro~ Pekins
Drive. Ta~ ~ap 38-2 (1) Parcel 6 and Tax ~ap 38-6 (1) Parcels
14 and 15 (Sheet 14).
Hr. J~ob~on pr¢~ented ~ su~m~ry of Ca~ 965~0179 an~ 96~P01~
and ~tated the applicant is requesting an appeal of the
Planning Cemmi~sion'~ Substantial A~cor~ Deracination that th~
County'~ Comurehen~ive Plan. ~e f~ther ~tmt~4 th~ Plmnning
Determination; and rec~d approval, subject to Conditions,
including a 100 foot buffer around the p~rimeter of the tower
site. He noted ~e basis for the Planning C~ssion and staff
reco~endation was to be consistent with ~e adopted ~
Facillt~ Plan, which ~ugge~t~ that oo~unication tow~r~
generally be located away from existing or that planned
r~idential areas.
4/24/96
95-286
There was no opposition present.
There was brief discussion relative to the possibility cf the
V~rglnia Department of Transportation (UDOT} possibly selling
the property and the Planning Commission and mtsff~
recommendation being ba~ed on the concept that Vnet could and
could be bought for residential development.
John Cogbill, Esquire, representing the applicant, r~qu~ted
th~ Substantial A~cord Oetermination ~ad~ by the Planning
com~isslon which would modify Conditions I and 2 to allow less
reviewed the background o~ the request and stated the applicant
feels there is adequate screening fort,he site andthat the
foot buffer is toe restrictive. He requested the Board to
modify Condition Number l, in Case 96PD0195, to delete the
se~te~ee "However, t~e to,er uitc shall be reloc~ted a
suffieien= distance to the west so as ts provide a minimum
foot perimeter of existing mature vegetation around the tower
site". He also re~uested ~he soard to modify
~, in Case 96PD01~5, to speak only to a ~0 foot buffer located
~e~t to t~e VDOT property and to a 60 foot b~ffer located on
the side adjacent to the Church'~ parking lot.
There wa~ brief discussion relative to the visibility of the
tower and to negative impact that the 100 foot buffer womld
have on Central Baptist Church.
Nrm. ~unphr~y read the a~mnd~d Cond~tionn i~to tko
~r. Cogbill clarified that the applicant a~eepts Conditions
NU~mbe~ i and 2, es ~odified by Mrs. Humphrey, and Conditions 3
through ll, a~ pr~ented.
On motion of )Lrs, Humphrey, eeccndpd by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved ~ase 9~PDOlP§~ subject to the following conditions:
1. The tower site shall be a& generally depicted on the plan
prepared by Charle~ K. ~leet & Associates, revised
November 3, 1~9~. (P &
~. A minimum 100 foot buffer shall be maintained adjacent to
the southern end western boundaries of the tower site; a
minim~ sixty (60) foot buffer shall be maintained
adjaeen~ to the northern boundary o~ the tower site; and
a minimum twenty (~0) foot buffer shall be maintained
adjacent to the eastern boundary of the tower site.
Except for accezs and utilities, whic~ may be e~tended
generally perpendicular through these buffers~ existing
mature vegetation within these buffer~ shall be preserved
and maintained. ~xist~ng vegetation shall be supplemented
Where necessary to minimize the views of the tower and
~ssoeia=sd equipment from adjacent properties and publi=
rights of way. Additional plmntings shall consist of
trees of species having an average minimum mature crown
spread of greater than thirty (30} feet and a minimum
caliper of 3,$ in0hoo at the ~ime of planting, t0 achieve
a density of at least on~ (1] tree for each twenty (~0)
lineal feet of buffer. In addition, cleared areas of 300
square f~et or greater shall b~ planted with trees, as
described herein, to achieve an minimum density of one (1)
time of site plan review, a landmcaping plan depicting
this re~uiremen= shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval. (P & BOS)
3. There shall be no sign~ p~rmltted to identify the tower
The base of the tower shall be enclosed hy a minimum six
(6) foot high fence, designed to preclude tregpag~nq. A
detailed plan depicting this requirement shall he
submitted to the ~lan~ing Depart~ment for approval in
conjunction with final site plan review. (P)
5. In cen~unction with site plan ~ubmis~ion, the
owner/developer ~hall submit documentation as to whether
FAA approval is req~ir=d for the erection of the tower.
If FAA approval is required, a copy of FAA approval shall
be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the
release of a building pa~mi~. (P)
6. The tower and equipment shall be designed and imstalled so
as not to interfere with the Che~terfiel~ Co~ty
Safety Trunkad System. The developer shall perform an
engineerinq study to determine the possibility of ra~io
frequency interference with the Co~ty ~ymt~. Prior to
release of a building permit, the ~tudyshall be submitted
Co~unication~ and =lectronlc~ ~taff.
7. The developer ~halI b~ r~ponslbl~ for correcting any
frequency problems whioh affect the Chesterfield Co~ty
~ubllc Safety Trunke~ System ca~ by this use.
correction~ shall be made i~ediately upon notification by
the Chesterfield county communi=ations and Electronics
~taff.
a. The exact design u~ the tower shall ~ approve4 ~y
the Pla~ing D%partmsnt. In g~n~al, the
shall b~ ~ ~ monopole design with a minimal
dim~n~ion~ so a~ to minimize the visual impact.
b. The tower shall be gray or another neutral color,
c. If l~ght~d, l~ghting during daylight hours shall
limiteO to medium intensity strobe lights with
upward r~flection and lightinq during night time
hours shall be limlted to ~oft ~linking light~.
9. All driveways and parking area~ nhall b~ graveled or paved
an4 maln=a~n~ to m~ni~ize dust problems and provide ease
of ingress and egress. (P)
10. Any building or mechanical equipment ~hall oo~ply with
Section 21.1-248 of the zoning Ordinance relative to
architectural treatment of building exterior~ and
screenin~ of mechanical epuipment.
of me,haul=al equipment loca%e~ on ~e bui14ing or
way. Screening would not be required for the ~ower
ur tower-mounted e~ipment.}
11. At such time that the tower ceasem to be used fo~
cc~unicntions purposes for a period exceeding twelve
COnseuutlve months, %h~ o~r/develoD~r shall dismantle
and r~move the tower and all associated equipment from the
property.
95-~88
And, further, the Board overruled the decision of =ha
Chesterfield Planning Commission and found Case 96PD0195 to be
in ~ub~tantlal accord with the ComDrehenmive Plan, nubjeot
the following conditions:
i. ~"ne tower site shall be as generally depicted on the plan
2, A minim%~m 100 foot buffer ~hall be maintained adjacent to
minimum sixty (60) foe= buffer shall be maintained
adjacent to the northern boundary cf the tower ~te; and
a minimum twenty (20) £e~t buffer shall be malnta~ned
adjacent to t/~e eastern boundary of the tower ~ite.
Except for accsec and utilities, which may ba
gan=rally pu~=ndiculur through these buffers,
matte vegetation within =hess buffers shall b~ preserved
wh~r= n~cessary to minimize the view~ of ~e tower ~n~
a~oclated equipment from adjacent propertle~ and public
rights o~ way, Additional ~lanting$ ~hall consist of
caliper of 3.5 inches a6 the time of planting, to achieve
a density of at lea~t on~ (i) tree for ~ach twenty (20)
llnual feat of buffer. In addition, cleared areas of 300
square feet or greater shall be planted witR t~ees, am
described herein, to achieve an minimum density of one
time of site plan review, a landscaping plan depicting
this requirement shall ~% submitted to th~ Planning
Department fo~ approval. {P &
3. Therm shall be no signs permitted to identify the tower
use. (~)
(6) foot high fence, d~i~ned to preclud~ trespassing. A
d~tailed plan d~picting this r~ir~ment shall b~
conjunction with final ~it. plan r~view.
Tn co~junct~on with ~it~ plan sub~sion, th~
o~er/d~velopur shall ~ubmlt ~oo~entaDicn as ~o whaler
F~ approval is required for the erection of the tower.
If F~ a~p~oval i~ rmgu~d, m co~y of F~ approval ~hall
b~ submitted to the Planning Dep~rtment prior to th~
a~ Dot to int~rfer~ with the Ch~gterfield County Public
safety Trunked system. The developer ~hall perfo~ an
engineering study ~o determin~ th~ pomsibility of ra~io
frequency interference with the Co~ty ~y~te~. Prior
release of a building permit, ~e study mhall be submitte~
Co~unications and Electronics staff.
Publio Safety Tru~e~ System caumed by thin.use. Such
corrections shall be made immediately ~Do~ notification by
~he Cheste~%ield County Co~unioa~ions and
staff.
4/24/96
S. The treatment, color and lighting ~ystem far the tower
~hall be a~ follow~:
The exact design of the tower shall be approved by
the Planning Department. In general, the tower
shall be of a mcnopole design wi~h e minimal
diameter. Further, antennas or other tower-mounted
equipment shall be spaced, placed and be of such
dimensions so us to minimize the visual impact.
b. The tower shall be gray or another neutral color,
acceptable to the ~lanning ~epartmen~.
c. If lighted, lighting during dayllqht hours shall be
linlted to medium intensity strobe lights with
upward reflection and lighting during night time
hours mhall be limited to soft blinking lightm. (~)
Ail ~rivew~ys mhd parking mre~s shall be graveled er paved
10. Any building or mechanical equipment ~hall comply with
architectural tyeat~e~t of b~ildi~g ~t~rior~ and
screening of mechanical equipment.
(NOTE: Thi~ condition would r~quire the screening of
from adjacent propertie~ and public right~ of way.
mounted equipment.)
11. At such time that the tower ceases to be used for
communications purpe~s for a period sxo=a~ing twelve
and remo~e ~he tower and all associated
property. (P)
Vote:
9.D.
EXECUTIVE SESSION (1)..~pUANT TO SECTIO~..2a.~T344A~l.,
CODE OF VIRGINIA, 19~o, AS ~/~ENDED~ TO DISCUSS
CANDIDATES FOR POLICE CHIE~ ~ ~2! PUR~U~aNT TO SECTION
2.1-344A.T FOR ~ONSULTATI~N NITK THE ~OTNTY ATTORNEY
NEOUIRIN8 LEGAL ADVICE ON TEE APPOINTNENT OPA POLICE
It wa~ generally aqre~d to continue with th~ ~auti~e
(1) Pursuant to Section ~.1-344A.1.~ Code of Virginia, 1950, as
Amended, to Di~au~ Candidat~n for Police Chief and
Pursuant to Section ~.1-344A.7. for Consultation w~th the
County Attorney Requiring Legal Advice on the Appointment of a
Police Chief.
On motion of Hr. MoHale, seconded by l~'~r. Barber, the Board
adopted the followlng resolution:
I4/~EREAS, the Board of ~up~rvi~or~ ha~ thi~ day adjourned
into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the
Board and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia
Freedom cf I~fcr~atio~ Act; and
4/24196
95-290
~EREAS, the Vizpinia F=eedcm o~ Information Act efZective
July 1, 1989 provides for certification that such Executive
Session was csnducted in csnformi~y with law.
~OW, TKEREFOP~ BE IT RESOLVED, the Board 9£ Supervisors
doe~ hereby certify that to the be~t cf each member's
knowledge, i} unly public buslnsaa matters lawfully exempted
Act were ~i~ou~sed in ~e Executive Session to w~ic~ t~is
certification applies, and
ii) only such public business matters as were identified
in the Motion by whi~ the Executive Session was convened were
hoard, discussod, or considered by th~ Board.' No membmr
dissents from ~is certification.
The Board being polled~ ~e vote was a~ follows:
Mr. M~ale : Aye.
Mr. Barber : Aye.
M~. Daniel : Aye.
16. ADJOUl%NMENT
On motion of Mr. MoHale, seconded by ~rs. Humphrey, the Board
adjourned at 9:15 p.m. until May ~, 1996 at 3ZOO p.m.
Vote: Unanimous
4/24/96
95-29I