2021-04-28 Agenda PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
AGENDA
April 28, 2021
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
JAMES M. HOLLAND
CHAIR
DALE DISTRICT
CHRISTOPHER M. WINSLOW
VICECHAIR
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT
JIM A. INGLE
BERMUDA DISTRICT
KEVIN P. CARROLL
MATOACA DISTRICT
LESLIE A.T. HALEY
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
JOSEPH P. CASEY, Ph.D.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
2:00 p.m. Work Session Public Meeting Room
1.Approval of Minutes
2.Requests to Postpone Agenda Items and Additions, Deletions or Changes in the Order of
Presentation
3.Work Sessions
A.Everyday Excellence IST
B.Fire and Emergency Medical Services Annual Update
C.COVID19 Update
D.Energy Management Program Update
E.Update on Implementation of New Computer Aided Dispatch and Records Management
Systems
F.Update on Key Financial Indicators Dashboard
4.Reports
A.District Improvement Funds (DIF) Monthly Report
5.FifteenMinute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
6.Closed Session
Page 1 of 399
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Meeting
April 28, 2021
A.1) Pursuant to § 2.23711(A)(8), Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, for Consultation with
Legal Counsel Regarding Specific Legal Matters Involving Riverside Regional Jail, Which
Requires the Provision of Legal Advice, 2) Pursuant to § 2.23711(A)(3), Code of Virginia,
1950, as Amended, to Discuss the Acquisition by the County of Real Estate for a Public
Purpose Where Discussion in an Open Meeting Would Adversely Affect the Bargaining
Position and Negotiating Strategy of the Public Body, and 3) Pursuant to § 2.23711(A)(5),
Code of Virginia, 1950, as Amended, to Discuss or Consider Prospective Businesses or
Industries or the Expansion of Existing Businesses or Industries Where no Previous
Announcement Has Been Made of the Businesses’ or Industries’ Interest in Locating or
Expanding Their Facilities in the Community
7.Recess for Dinner
6:00 p.m. Evening Session Public Meeting Room
8.Invocation
The Honorable Kevin Carroll, Matoaca District Supervisor
9.Pledge of Allegiance
Deputy County Administrator Matt Harris
10.County Administration Update
A.Miss Wheelchair USA
B.Asian Pacific American Heritage Month
C.Purchasing Director Introduction
D.Other County Administration Updates
11.Board Member Reports
12.Resolutions and Special Recognitions
A.Resolution Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation
Department
B.Resolution Recognizing Mr. James E. Poff, Department of General Services, Building and
Grounds Division, Upon His Retirement
C.Resolution Recognizing Ms. Crystal A. Alexander, Department of General Services Building
and Grounds Division, Upon Her Retirement
13.New Business
A.Appointments
1.Committee on the Future
Page 2 of 399
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Meeting
April 28, 2021
2.Chesterfield Community Services Board
B.Consent Items
1.Adoption of Resolutions
a.Resolution Recognizing Mr. John W. West, Jr., Department of General
Services, Building and Grounds Division, Upon His Retirement
b.Resolution Recognizing Lieutenant William J. Jeffords Jr, Fire and
Emergency Medical Services, Upon His Retirement
c.Resolution of Support for the Proposed Bailey Bridge Connector Alignment
d.Resolution Approving the Request of Bon Secours Critical Care Transport to
Operate NonEmergency Ambulance Service
e.Resolution Approving Richmond Regional Planning District Commission
(“RRPDC”) Charter Amendments and Approving a Multiple Voting and
Alternate Voting Structure
2.Real Property Requests
a.Acceptance of Parcels of Land
1.Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Jefferson Davis Highway
and Sand Hills Drive from Primax Properties, LLC
2.Acceptance of Parcels of Land Adjacent to Happy Hill Road from
Abundant Life Church of Deliverance, Inc.
3.Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike from
QSR Realty Partners LC
4.Acceptance of a Parcel of Land on Bermuda Hundred Road from the
Economic Development Authority
b.Requests to Quitclaim
1.Request to Quitclaim Portions of a 20' Drainage Easement (Private),
SWMBMP Easements, a 20’ SWMBMP Access Easement and a 20’
Ingress and Egress Easement Across the Properties of Super Radiator
Coils Limited Partnership
2.Request to Vacate and Rededicate a 16’ Water Easement Across the
Property of Greenyard Storage, LLC
3.Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 16’ Drainage Easement Across
14601 Hancock Village Street
Page 3 of 399
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Meeting
April 28, 2021
4.Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Variable Width SWM/BMP
Easement Across the Property of Winterfield Crossing Land LLC
5.Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 20’ Water Easement Across a
Portion of 1600 Ashton Park Drive
3.Award a Construction Contract for Project IFB#ADMN21000177: Stratton Park
Pedestrian Improvements and Appropriation of Funds
4.Appropriation of Funds and Authorization to Proceed with the Greenleigh Bus
Turnaround and Pullout Project
5.Set Public Hearing Date to Consider the FY2022FY2027 Secondary Road SixYear
Plan and FY2022 Secondary Road Budget
6.Acceptance of State Roads
7.Accept and Appropriate
a.Accept and Appropriate Grant Funds From the Virginia Department of
Aviation for Design of the Chesterfield County Airport Airfield Drive
Rehabilitation Project
b.Accept and Appropriate Grant Funds From the Virginia Department of
Aviation for Demolition of the Old Airport Fuel Farm and Construction of the
New Fuel Farm Fuel Truck Parking Area
c.Accept and Appropriate $65,500 in Additional Funding from the Department
of Behavioral Health & Developmental Services for a State Opioid Response
(SOR) Grant
d.Accept and Appropriate $145,055 in Funding from the Department of
Behavioral Health & Developmental Services for Additional Funding from the
State Opioid Response (SOR) Grant Year 3
e.Accept and Appropriate $72,127 in FY2022 Funding from the Department of
Behavioral Health & Developmental Services
14.FifteenMinute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
15.Deferred Items
16.Requests for Manufactured Home Permits and Rezoning Placed on the Consent Agenda to be
Heard in the Following Order:
Withdrawals/Deferrals
Cases Where the Applicant Accepts the Recommendation and There is No Opposition
Cases Where the Applicant Does Not Accept the Recommendation and/or There is
Public Opposition Will Be Heard at Section 18
Page 4 of 399
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Meeting
April 28, 2021
A.20SN0609 Dudley C. Duncan Matoaca District
B.21SN0551 Verdad Real Estate and Construction Services Matoaca District
C.21SN0556 Christian Life Center, Inc. Matoaca District
D.21SN0561 CP4 Development, LLC Clover Hill District
E.21SN0571 Wynel and Sinclair Aaron Harris Bermuda District
17.Public Hearings
A.To Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 70’ Right of Way Known as Ashton Park Drive
B.To Consider Conveyance of a 15' Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company for the
Emergency Communications Center
C.To Consider Conveyance of a 15' Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company at the
Ashbrook Wastewater Pump Station
D.To Adopt an Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of Omo Road within Ampthill Gardens Section 1
E.To Consider Draft Rockwood Special Focus Area (Plan)
F.To Consider a Third Lease Amendment with 5G Air, LLC for Construction of Aircraft
Hangars at the Chesterfield County Airport
G.To Consider an Amendment to the Code of the County of Chesterfield Related To Serving
and Consuming Alcoholic Beverages on County Property
H.To Consider an Ordinance Amendment to Move the Polling Place for Precinct 106 from
Harrowgate Elementary School at 15501 Harrowgate Road, to the New Harrowgate
Elementary School Located at 4000 Cougar Trail
18.Remaining Manufactured Home Permits and Zoning Requests
19.FifteenMinute Citizen Comment Period on Unscheduled Matters
20.Adjournment
A.Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors
Page 5 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 3.A.
Subject:
Everyday Excellence - IST
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
1.IST Everyday Excellence 4.28.21 Presentation
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 6 of 399
Chesterfield County
Information Systems
Technology
COVID -19 Vaccination
Response
Page 7 of 399
IST Personnel
▫Tracie Chambers
▫Chris Coleman
▫Bobby Cox
▫Suzanne Crostic
▫Janet Dalton
▫Mary Folkes
▫Lauren Henry
▫Sherry Hensley
▫John Howe
▫Matt Hudgins
▫Art Johne
▫Tori Kirby
▫Diane Landen
▫Tiejun Ma
▫Nicole Maillet
▫Pat Mims
▫Meg Molique
▫Joe Pugh
▫Daniel Rubio
▫Chris Schurman
▫Inderpreet Singh
▫Anand Sudershan
▫Sheri Swineford
▫Nancy Tickle
▫Jason Van Dusen
▫Mike Wells
▫Todd Wells
▫Linda West
▫Tripp Wray
Page 8 of 399
How IST Assisted
Training
Page 9 of 399
How IST Assisted
One-on -One Support
Page 10 of 399
How IST Assisted
Volunteering When
and Where Needed
Page 11 of 399
Timeline of
Contributed Resources
December –No vaccine administration system.
January –First version of the VARS system,
employees at PSTC PODs.
February –MOU signed; began working with
VDH on registration data.
March –Began Fairgrounds PODs with
county system.
April –New VARS version launched.
May –VARS will be used for
dose two PODs at Fairgrounds.
Vaccine Administration and Reporting System (VARS),
truly a state-of -the-art system.
Page 12 of 399
Facts of Note
•POD Stats
•35,000+ total vaccinations
•1.3 terabytes of downloaded information from VDH
•Average 18.6 minutes onsite per vaccination
•90,000 invitations sent to residents
•72 hours of effort saved per clinic (nine personnel)
•Over 45 PODs supported by onsite IST personnel
•VARS submitted for a NACo award
•Worked closely with CHD staff, volunteers and
leadership
•Assisted CHD to be first health district to integrate
with Statewide Pre-Registration System
•Assisted CHD to be first health district to
automatically update State Immunization System
•Resources Devoted at PODs
•Over three years of staff time
•Network infrastructure improvements
•40 Dell tablets
•15 large monitors
•$1,691 in Microsoft Cloud charges
•Digital Communications
•761,844 COVID-19 pageviews (since March 2020)
•COVID -19 pages are top four in 2021 (by pageviews)
•25% of ChesterBot queries are COVID-19 related
•We are engaging traditionally harder to reach age
groups on the web in 2021 –Aged 64+ group
increased 13% and aged 55-64 increased 6%
compared to 2020
Page 13 of 399
“
“Could not have been easier or better coordinated from start
to finish. Everyone was friendly and well trained. PERFECT!!!!”
Customer Satisfaction
Custom er Rating –4.9/5
“This is the most efficient process
I’ve ever been through.
Great customer service!!!”
“Chesterfield, your vaccination process
was impeccable. From scheduling to
the parking, greeting and processing
check in, the personnel administering
the shot and check out! Absolutely
flawless! I thank you for your diligence
and support given to your constituents!
Job well done!”
“I was exceedingly astonished by the efficiency of this
operation. I received a call the moment I registered and I
never had to wait in line at any point during the process.
The shear manpower required to pull this feet of organization
off is profound to contemplate. I'm left a little lost for words,
but I am very grateful for this A+ level of service, I only wish
the rest of my life was this streamlined. Thank you!”
Page 14 of 399
Chesterfield County
Information Systems
Technology
COVID -19 Vaccination
Response
Page 15 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 3.B.
Subject:
Fire and Emergency Medical Services Annual Update
Board Action Requested:
No action required.
Summary of Information:
Staff will update the Board of Supervisors on staffing and service-related trends and highlight various
initiatives of the Fire and EMS Department that are focused on addressing these trends and better meeting the
changing needs of the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Attachments:
1.Fire EMS Update 4-28-21 (Final Version)
Preparer:Loy Senter, Fire Chief
Approved By:
Page 16 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
1
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Fire & EMS Update
Report to the Board of Supervisors: April 28, 2021
Edward “Loy” Senter Jr., Fire & EMS Chief
Page 17 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
2
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Recruitment & Retention
Variables FY-2020 5-Year
Average
Separations 36 30
Turnover Rate 7.7%6.8%
Reasons for Separation FY-2020 5-Year
Average
Other Occupation 27.8%21.9%
Retirement 25.0%46.5%
Disciplinary & Performance 19.4%11.5%
Family Obligation 11.1%7.9%
Relocation 5.6%5.3%
Steps CY-2020 5-Year
Average
Applications 536 992
Tested (Written)35.8%39.1%
Passed (Written)59.9%59.8%
Interviewed 74.8%76.7%
Hired 17.5%18.5%
Hires vs. Applicants (%)2.8%3.3%
Measure FY-2020 5-Year
Average
Recruit School Graduates 48 35
Graduation Rate (%)86.3%90.1%
Page 18 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
3
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Recruit School Graduation
Page 19 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
4
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Recruit Graduation
Page 20 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
5
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Staffing
New Positions FY-2020 Authorized
Strength
Magnolia Green
Fire & EMS Station +20 516
Method FY-2020 YoY
Change
OT Expenditure $4, 201, 009 -5.1%
Mandatory OT 906 -34.7%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Mandatory OT Occurrences
(Fiscal Year)
Page 21 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
6
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Awards & Recognition
2020
Page 22 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
7
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Fire & EMS Service Demands
Incidents FY-2020 YoY Change
Fire 1,623 +1.8%
EMS 34,401 -1.4%
Other 6,675 +0.9%
Total 42,699 -0.9%
District FY-2020
Chester 3,392
Buford 3,329
Clover Hill 2,375
Dale 2,888
Bensley 2,839
Station FY-2020
Dale 4,639
Dutch Gap 4,403
Courthouse 4,273
Centralia 4,177
Bensley 4,109
Unit FY-2020
Engine 9 1,859
Unit FY-2020
Medic 11 2,502
Page 23 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
8
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Patient Population
Patient Type FY-2020 YoY Change
Patient Average Age 56.6 +0.2%
Basic Life Support 12,179 +4.2%
Advanced Life Support 10,182 -5.3%
Total Patient Transports 22,361 -0.4%
Page 24 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
9
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Patient Population
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Naloxone Administrations
(Fiscal Year)
Patient Type FY-2020 YoY Change
MIH 377 -6.7%
Naloxone
Administration 504 +5.6%
Opioid Patients 176 +2.3%
Page 25 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
10
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Mutual Aid
Description Aid Provided Aid Received
Incident Count 336 391
Unit Responses 774 297
Time Committed 484 112
484
112
Summary of All Mutual Aid FY-2020
(Hours)
Mutual Aid Given Mutual Aid Received
Locality Incidents YoY Change
Richmond 134 +55.8%
Colonial Heights 86 +1.2%
Amelia 57 +119.2%
Petersburg 35 +29.6%
Powhatan 26 -18.8%
Dinwiddie 21 +75.0%
Page 26 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
11
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Mutual Aid
Locality Series
Richmond 100
Chesterfield 200
Henrico 300
Hanover 400
New Kent 500
Goochland 600
Caroline 700
Petersburg 800
Colonial Heights 900
King William 1000
Dinwiddie 1100
Prince George 1200
Powhatan 1300
Hopewell 1400
Page 27 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
12
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Magnolia Green Fire & EMS Station
•Opened:
•December 14, 2020
•5 FF’s on Duty 24/7
•Response Units:
•Engine Company
•Medic Unit
•Tanker
•Brush Truck
•Incident Responses:
•January: 104
•February: 146
•March: 120
•Dedication TBD
Page 28 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
13
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Midlothian Fire & EMS Station
•Construction Start:
•December 8, 2020
•Projected Opening:
•Late FY-2022
•Response Units:
•Engine Company
•Ladder Company
•Medic Unit
•Brush Truck
•New Hires:
•20 (January 2022)
•Partnership:
•Forest View VRS
Page 29 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
14
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Update: Study & Research Initiative
•Now on 3rd project manager.
•Working to ensure:
•Alignment of data in consistent 5-year study
periods.
•More robust analysis in support of
recommendations.
•Expect completed report in mid to late
Summer 2021.
•Start-up delayed due to COVID vaccination
efforts.
•Securing required contracts:
•Telemedicine.
•Treat in place.
•Alternative destination.
•Revised start-up date is projected for late
May or early June 2021.
Page 30 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
15
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
FY-2021: “A Look Ahead”
700 Year Flood Vaccination Effort Ice Storm Multi-Fatal Fire
Page 31 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
16
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
FY-2021: “A Look Ahead”
Emerging Issue: Hospital Diversions
•Restored:
•Station Visits
•Ride-a-longs
•Recruit School Graduations
•Pending:
•Magnolia Green FS Dedication
•Promotion Ceremonies
•Awards Ceremonies
•Fire Prevention Week Activities
•Planned (Post July 1, 2021):
•Semi-Annual Briefings on Incident
Activity by Magisterial District
Page 32 of 399
CH
E
S
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
V
A
17
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WORK SESSION: APRIL 28, 2021
Questions?
Edward “Loy” Senter Jr.
Fire & EMS Chief
senterl@chesterfield.gov
(804) 748-1912
Page 33 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 3.C.
Subject:
COVID-19 Update
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Dr. James Worsley, Deputy County Administrator and staff will provide an update on local vaccine distribution
and planning.
Attachments:
1.COVID-19 Vaccination Update 04282021
Preparer:James Worsley, Deputy County Administrator
Approved By:
Page 34 of 399
COVID-19
Vaccination Update
James Worsley, Ph.D.
Deputy County Administrator
Page 35 of 399
Overview
•General COVID Update
•VDH Chesterfield Health District Update
•Fire & EMS County Government Update
•CERA Funding Update
Page 36 of 399
General Info Update:
Positive Community
Feedback
Page 37 of 399
General Info Update: Phase 2
•Virginia is now in Phase 2 of vaccination, with eligibility open to everyone age 16 or older.
•Anyone who pre-registered in Phase 1 has either been offered a vaccination appointment already or will be by April 30th.
•Everyone should continue to visit vaccinate.virginia.gov or call 877-VAX -IN-VA to get vaccinated.
Page 38 of 399
General Info Update: Fifth Amended Executive
Order 72 (effective April 21, 2021)
•Seating is now permitted in bar areas of restaurants, provided at least 6 feet is
maintained between parties and no standing congregation is permitted.
•Outdoor races and marathons may place runners in staggered groups of up to 100
(up from 50).
•School theatrical and musical performances may allow patrons up to 30% of the
venue capacity, with a maximum of 500 patrons indoors and no specific limit
outdoors.
•Distancing requirements have been decreased from 10 feet to 6 feet for
entertainment and public amusement venues, swimming pool seating, graduations,
and recreational sporting events.
•Personal care and personal grooming studios are no longer required to maintain
appointment logs and contact information for customers.
•Karaoke is no longer prohibited.
•Splash pads, hot tubs, and saunas are no longer prohibited.
•Brass instrument players may remove masks while playing, as could wind instrument
players previously.
Page 39 of 399
General Info Update: Sixth Amended Executive
Order 72 (effective May 15, 2021)
•Capacity limits at entertainment venues will increase from 30%
to 50%, with an increase in the maximum number of indoor
patrons from 500 to 1,000 and no specific limit on the number
of outdoor patrons.
•Capacity limits at recreational sports venues will increase from
30% to 50%, with a maximum of 250 spectators per field for
indoor events and 1,000 spectators per field for outdoor
events.
•The limit on social gatherings will increase from 50 to 100
indoors and from 100 to 250 outdoors.
Page 40 of 399
General Info Update: Available
Resources
•Chesterfield County Public Libraries have professional staff that are available to help you register for the COVID-19 vaccine.
•Free rides to COVID-19 vaccine appointments are being accommodated two ways:
•Through it’s Access On Demand program, Chesterfield will cover the $6 per trip transportation fee to COVID-19 vaccination appointments, making the trip free for those registered with Chesterfield Mobility Services.
•Those not eligible or registered through Access On Demand can still call Chesterfield Mobility Services and staff will assist them in getting a free ride through GRTC’s and Uzurv partnership program using GRTC CARES Act funding.
Page 41 of 399
Page 42 of 399
Page 43 of 399
General Info Update:
Thank You to Our
Partners & Volunteers
Page 44 of 399
General Info Update:
Parks and Recreation
Summer Camps
•Offering more than 50 summer camps
•Outdoor adventure
•Nature
•History
•Community recreation
•Therapeutic recreation
•Inclusion services are also offered
•Science
•Educational and sports related camps
•Virtual and in-person programming
•COVID-19 friendly precautions will be taken
•Camp registration opened April 19, 2021
For more information:
https://www.chesterfield.gov/940/Program-Guide
804-748-1623
Page 45 of 399
COVID-19
Vaccination Update
Dr. Alexander Samuel
Director of VDH Chesterfield
Health District
Page 46 of 399
Page 47 of 399
Page 48 of 399
Page 49 of 399
Fire & EMS COVID-19
Vaccination Update
Chief Loy Senter
Fire & EMS Chief
Page 50 of 399
Chesterfield County
Vaccination Efforts
(Total Doses Since December 23, 2020)
Credit:WTVR Channel 6
Page 51 of 399
Community Vaccination
Center (CVC)
•Located at Virginia State University (VSU).
•Funded by Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA).
•Administered by Virginia Department of Emergency
Management (VDEM).
•Operated by AshBritt-IEM Health.
•Began Operating March 17, 2021.
•Total Vaccinations:
•82,484 doses
•13,556 doses per week on average.
•Operation extended to end of May 2021.
Credit:Chesterfield Observer Page 52 of 399
Road to Community Vaccination Goal
www.chesterfield.gov/coronavirus
Page 53 of 399
Questions?
Edward “Loy” Senter Jr.
Fire & EMS Chief
senterl@chesterfield.gov
(804) 748-1912
Page 54 of 399
CERA Funding Update
Daniel Cohen
Director of Community Enhancement
Page 55 of 399
Chesterfield’s Partnership with
ACTS/HOMEWARD
Board allocated $550,000 in 2020 of County CARES Act Funding providing assistance to Chesterfield households who could not pay monthly housing costs (rent or mortgage).
Board supported County application in 2021 to Department of Treasury for $10.5 million for Emergency Rent & Utility Assistance (CERA) Program which includes funding for homeless related services.
CERA assistance can pay for up to 12 months of future or owed rent, plus an additional three months if necessary, to ensure housing stability.
CERA Program funds are only available for renters and can be used for the following:
•Rent
•Rental arrears
•Utilities and home energy costs
•Internet service deemed vital
•Utilities and home energy costs arrears
•Other housing expenses resulting from the pandemic
Page 56 of 399
Resident Initiated Applications
•Complete online application at: http://actsrva.org/chesterfield-
cera-application/or Call ACTS at 804-644-2401.
•Landlords can find information with instructions
at: http://actsrva.org/chesterfield-landlord-information
•Landlords should send completed applications with required
documentation attached to chesterfieldlandlord@actsrva.org.
•Homeward provides services that include:
•Non-congregate shelter for 100 persons
•Housing Stabilization for 30-40 households
•Flexible Financial assistance for 20-40 households
Chesterfield’s Partnership with ACTS/HOMEWARD
Page 57 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 3.D.
Subject:
Energy Management Program Update
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Staff will provide the Board an update on various energy management program topics.
Attachments:
1.GS Energy Mgt2-BOS
Preparer:Clay Bowles, Director
Approved By:
Page 58 of 399
Energy Management
Program Update
Board of Supervisors
April 28, 2021
Page 59 of 399
Our Mission
•Facilitate efforts to improve energy efficiency and sustainability in keeping with energy pyramid
Conservation
Efficiency
Renewable Energy
•Support Schools and Utilities
•Work with county/school Facility Management and Capital Projects
•Data analysis and management
•Contract Administration - Virginia Energy Purchasing Governmental Association (VEPGA)
Page 60 of 399
Focus on Fundamentals
Data Analysis
All consumption and expenses tracked for ongoing trend analysis
Contract Administration
Monitoring and ensuring compliance w/ VEPGA contract
Demand Response Program
Voluntary reduction of electric demand in select facilities in exchange for rebates
Energy Efficiency Program
Rebates for reduced consumption through equipment replacement (e.g., HVAC)
Rate Evaluations
Annual review of facility rate schedules
Utility Bill Audits
Identification of possible billing errors and/or equipment malfunction
Page 61 of 399
Focus on Fundamentals
Cfield Unplugged
Employee behavioral based energy awareness
Facilities Design
Sustainable and energy-efficient best practices
Fleet Vehicle Alternative Fuel Programs
56 vehicles and buses powered by liquid propane
Electric school bus pilot program
VACO Go Green Program
Rebates for reducing use through equipment replacement
Page 62 of 399
FY18-20
Energy
Expenditures
and
Consumption
Expenditures
Consumption
Commodity FY2018 Cost FY2019 Cost FY2020 Cost
% Change FY2019 to
FY2020
Electricity $3,983,473 $4,074,021 $3,901,884 -4.2%
Water $435,798 $415,771 $418,968 0.8%
Natural Gas $457,661 $407,685 $338,725 -16.9%
Propane $25,448 $21,228 $13,311 -37.3%
Total $4,902,380 $4,918,705 $4,672,888 -5.0%
Commodity FY2018 Use FY2019 Use FY2020 Use
% Change FY2019 to
FY2020
Electricity (kWh)38,215,628 37,874,061 35,515,424 -6.2%
Water (Mgal)61,484 53,877 62,817 16.6%
Natural Gas (MCF)58,093 52,671 45,906 -12.8%
Propane (Gal)19,615 17,210 13,708 -20.3%
Page 63 of 399
Current Initiatives
LED Street Light Conversions
Retrofit existing, highest cost lights
Achieve longevity of LEDs and lower cost
Exterior Lighting Enhancements
FY22 major maintenance project
Recommended in security study
Triple win – Enhances security, removes
maintenance-intensive infrastructure,
lowers cost via implementing energy
efficient equipment
Harmonic Filter Pilot
Filters placed on electric panels at Ettrick
Library to detect and smooth non-linear
power loads, which can lead to inefficient
distribution and higher energy costs
Monitoring for efficiency results following
use during normal operations and after full
heating and cooling cycle
Page 64 of 399
Partnering with CCPS for
evaluation of 17 potential
sites for solar program
Power purchase
agreements – long-term
rate stability
Currently completing
contract review and other
due diligence tasks
Current Initiatives – Solar Energy
Page 65 of 399
Solar Energy
Partnering with CCPS for
evaluation of 17 potential
sites for solar program
Power purchase
agreements – long-term
rate stability
Currently completing
contract review and other
due diligence tasks
Page 66 of 399
QUESTIONS?
Page 67 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 3.E.
Subject:
Update on Implementation of New Computer Aided Dispatch and Records Management Systems
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Tommy Tucker, Director of the Emergency Communications Center, will update the Board of Supervisors on
the implementation of the new system provided by Motorola Solutions, Inc., replacing the county’s existing
systems for Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Mobile and Records Management System (RMS)and the
new Jail Management System (JMS).
Attachments:
1.CAD Update Presentation for BOS 4-28-21
Preparer:Scott Zaremba, Deputy County Administrator
Approved By:
Page 68 of 399
Implementation of the New
Computer Aided Dispatch,
Records Management, and Jail
Management Systems
Page 69 of 399
Motorola Premier 1 CAD Go-live Timeframe
•Premier 1 CAD go-live date is slated for May 25, 2021
•Police RMS go-live slated for early July 2021
•Sheriff JMS go-live on hold pending Motorola’s resolution and upgrade to the
software to address sentencing guidelines for prisoners
•All interfaces needed for May 25th go-live will be ready for implementation
•New police call signs and the Falling Creek precinct will be in place before CAD
go-live
•Fire will implement the regional numbering system at CAD go-live
•Project remains on budget
Page 70 of 399
System Improvements and Benefits
•Information sharing suite so all departments have access to the data in CAD
•Upgrade to the Records Management (RMS) and implementation of the Jail
Management (JMS) systems
•Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) dispatching
•Upgraded PMDC mapping
•CAD and mapping changes can be made instantaneously
•Expanded call dispatching protocols
•New paging and notification system
•Drag and drop functionality for the 911 operators
Page 71 of 399
System Improvements and Benefits -Fire
•Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) to dispatch the closest unit to an incident as
opposed to our current run card system that are based on static station locations
and street centerlines
•Premise alerts are easily accessible to the officer
•Upgraded mapping on the MDC and updates to the MDC are instantaneous
•Upgraded call dispatching protocols that include dispatch of unit based on a risk
assessment model
•LiveMum software that assists the ECC with move-ups of units during heavy call
loads to ensure the best coverage of the County
•Pulse Point
•ProQA Emergency Medical Dispatching
Page 72 of 399
System Improvements and Benefits -Police
•AVL dispatching so the closest unit will be dispatched to an incident not based off
the assigned beat for Priority calls
•Functionality of PMDCs with VCIN and RMS access
•Information and incident history is shared on police incidents from the start of
the 911 call to sentencing of an individual
•Officer safety improvements through MDC and handheld tracking
•Coplogic software “DORS”
•SpidrTech interface with RMS
Page 73 of 399
Radio Project and
Tower Installation
•Six new towers in process of being constructed
•ECC console replacement and installation of new radio equipment in progress
•Construction will continue through May 2022
•Coverage and acceptance testing is slated for Summer 2022 during full foliage
•2023 turn on of the system and testing to include in-building coverage
•Final acceptance January 19, 2024
Page 74 of 399
Questions
Page 75 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 3.F.
Subject:
Update on Key Financial Indicators Dashboard
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
The Key Financial Indicators Dashboard leverages economic data from multiple sources and provides
comprehensive insights into financial, economic, and demographic data at the national, state, and local level.
This dashboard transitions the previous printed Quarterly Financial Indicators Report to a dashboard on the
county website. Doing so allows for more frequent updates, allowing pertinent economic conditions to be
displayed to the public more quickly.
Attachments:
None
Preparer:Gerard Durkin, Acting Budget Director
Approved By:
Page 76 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 4.A.
Subject:
District Improvement Funds (DIF) Monthly Report
Board Action Requested:
Accept the attached District Improvement Funds (DIF) Monthly Report.
Summary of Information:
The attached report details approved and proposed uses of DIF for FY2021. Acceptance of the report will serve
as approval for staff to expend DIF funds for the proposed uses as listed.
Attachments:
1.DIF Report - April 28 2021
Preparer:Gerard Durkin, Acting Budget Director
Approved By:
Page 77 of 399
1 | Page DIF Report 4/28/2021
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Monthly Report on District Improvement Funds
Report Date: April 28, 2021
Prepared By: Budget and Management
The County annually budgets $33,500 in discretionary funds, referred to as District Improvement
Funds (DIF), for each of the five magisterial districts that are used to improve the quality of life in each
district. The DIF allocations can be used for public improvements, purchase of county-owned
equipment, public events or programs, public school programs, and other legally allowable expenses.
In addition, if funds remain in DIF accounts at the end of each fiscal year, up to $37,500 may be
reserved per district at year-end to be utilized in a future year. On July 22, 2020, the Board authorized
a one-time waiver of the rollover cap on District Improvement Funds to make available in FY2021
funds that were unable to be spent due to the COVID-19 pandemic. With approval of this report, the
Board consents to the use of available reserve balance, if needed.
This report shows the cumulative use of District Improvement Funds for FY2021 as well as the current
funding available for each district. Requests to use funds for the current month are detailed below and
listed as a proposed use on the summary chart for that district. Upon Board of Supervisors acceptance
of this report each month, staff will execute proposed DIF requests.
There are two DIF uses proposed this month. Acceptance of this report by the Board constitutes Board
approval of these requests.
April 2021 Requests:
Transfer up to $2,417.36 from the Clover Hill District Improvement Fund to Streetlights for new
streetlight installation at the Bellshire Subdivision.
Transfer up to $6,900 to Schools to purchase lawn equipment for Cosby High School
DIF Balances To Date:
Bermuda – Current Balance $52,882.78 (FY21 funding plus available reserves)
Request Date Use Amount
2/24/2021 North Courthouse Road library children’s picture books $1,000.00
3/24/2021 Richmond Street streetlights $893.78
Total FY2021 Bermuda uses $1,893.78
Page 78 of 399
2 | Page DIF Report 4/28/2021
Clover Hill – Current Balance $25,691.80 (FY21 funding plus available reserves)
Request Date Use Amount
8/26/2020 Communities in Schools mentoring program $2,500.00
10/28/2020 Clover Hill High School new band uniforms $1,000.00
10/28/2020 Courthouse and West Providence Road trees $7,000.00
12/16/2020 Brown’s Bluff at Colony Pointe subdivision streetlights $1,011.66
2/24/2021 North Courthouse Road library children’s picture books $1,000.00
Proposed Bellshire Subdivision streetlights $2,417.36
Total FY2021 Clover Hill uses $14,929.02
Dale – Current Balance $71,593.71 (FY21 funding plus available reserves)
Matoaca – Current Balance $46,137.60 (FY21 funding plus available reserves)
Request Date Use Amount
11/18/2020 River Road streetlights $1,575.00
1/27/2021 Manchester High School scoreboard $7,180.00
2/24/2021 North Courthouse Road library children’s picture books $1,000.00
3/24/2021 Piedmont Estates Subdivision streetlights $1,435.21
Proposed Lawn equipment for Cosby High School $6,900.00
Total FY2021 Matoaca uses $18,090.21
Midlothian – Current Balance $90,442.00 (FY21 funding plus available reserves)
Request Date Use Amount
10/28/2020 Lloyd C. Bird High School football field upgrades and improvements $3,000.00
11/18/2020 Cogbill Road at Meadow Oaks Boulevard streetlights $1,575.00
11/18/2020 Airport entrance beautification $10,240.00
2/24/2021 Meadowbrook High School light poles $2,061.00
2/24/2021 North Courthouse Road library children’s picture books $1,000.00
Total FY2021 Dale uses $17,876.00
Request Date Use Amount
11/18/2020 Oxford subdivision streetlights $1,575.00
2/24/2021 North Courthouse Road library children’s picture books $1,000.00
Total FY2021 Midlothian uses $2,575.00
Page 79 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 10.A.
Subject:
Miss Wheelchair USA
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
None
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 80 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 10.B.
Subject:
Asian Pacific American Heritage Month
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
None
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 81 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 10.C.
Subject:
Purchasing Director Introduction
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
None
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 82 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 10.D.
Subject:
Other County Administration Updates
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
None
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 83 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 12.A.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
The Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department celebrated its 50th anniversary on April 14, 2021.
The Department is to be recognized and commended for its substantial and continuing contribution to the
quality of life in Chesterfield County, the provision of active lifestyle choices for all ages and abilities, the
construction and maintenance of outstanding facilities and amenities to the community we so proudly serve,
and for the many visitors we are able to welcome to Chesterfield County.
Attachments:
1.Parks and Recreation 50th Anniversary Resolution - Final - 042821
2.50th anniversary Parks and Rec BOS
Preparer:Robert Smet, Director, Parks and Recreation
Approved By:
Page 84 of 399
RECOGNIZING CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
UPON ITS 50TH ANNIVERSARY
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department
celebrated its 50th anniversary on April 14; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department was created by the Board of
Supervisors on April 14, 1971; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department earned national
accreditation from the Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation
Agencies in September of 2018; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department manages grounds maintenance
supporting 70 parks and athletic complexes, 66 schools, 9 libraries, 6 county
facilities, supervises turf management, athletic field preparation, upkeep
of 42 trail miles and provides emergency assistance during natural disasters,
crises, and snow events to support safe passage and quickly reopen county
and school facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department serves over 300,000
residents each year in a variety of recreational programs including sports,
arts and crafts, therapeutic recreation, nature and outdoor adventures,
camps, and historical programs for all ages and abilities and has over six
million visits to the parks system annually; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department manages more than 55 sports
tourism events contributing $29.5 million in economic impact for the county;
and
WHEREAS, it is both an honor and a privilege for the Parks and Recreation
Department to serve the citizens of Chesterfield County and its visitors
with great enthusiasm, passion, pride, and exemplary customer service; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department is to be commended for its
substantial and continuing contribution to the health and wellness of the
community, its conservation efforts, and its commitment to equitable
distribution of programs and facilities; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, this 28th day of April 2021, publicly recognizes the Parks and
Recreation Department, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens
of Chesterfield County, appreciation for its commitment to exceptional
service to the county.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented
to the current director and that this resolution be permanently recorded
among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia.
Page 85 of 399
Chesterfield County
Parks & Recreation
Page 86 of 399
Carl Wise
1971-78
Phil Hester
1978-86
First Parks and Recreation Directors
Page 87 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Adventure Camp River Rats Camp
Page 88 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
May Fest
Page 89 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Wheelchair
Basketball
Page 90 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Boulders
Concert
Series 1987
Page 91 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Courthouse
Caper 5K
Page 92 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Hang
gliding
Page 93 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Outdoor
Odyssey
1986
Page 94 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Rainbow of
Arts 1983
Page 95 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Tot Lot
Opening,
Iron Bridge
Park 1990
Page 96 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Labor Day
parade
1981
Page 97 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Ocean
fishing trip
Page 98 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Halloween
Happening
1978
Page 99 of 399
Year Popula
tion
Gro
wth
1970 76,855
1980 141,37
2
84 %
1990 209,27
4
8 %
2000 259,90
3
24 %
2010 316,23
6
22 %
2019 352,80
2
12 %
Legendary
Christmas
Page 100 of 399
Share your story
Do you have a favorite memory at a
Chesterfield County park or a favorite
activity you participated in over the years?
Parks and Recreation wants to hear from
you! Citizens who grew up in Chesterfield
in the 1970’s are encouraged to celebrate
this special occasion by sharing their
involvement in parks and recreation
activities, including sports, special events,
camps and more. Submit your memory or
story to parksrec@chesterfield.gov.
Page 101 of 399
For more information
50th anniversary webpage:
www.chesterfield.gov/parks50th
Page 102 of 399
For more information
Page 103 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 12.B.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Mr. James E. Poff, Department of General Services, Building and Grounds Division,
Upon His Retirement
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Mr. James E. Poff retired from the Department of General Services, Buildings and Grounds Division, on January 1, 2021 after providing over 29
years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Attachments:
1.Retirement Resolution-04.28.2021-Building and Grounds-James E. Poff-BOSrev
Preparer:Clay Bowles, Director
Approved By:
Page 104 of 399
RECOGNIZING MR. JAMES E. POFF UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mr. James E. Poff retired from the Chesterfield County
Department of General Services Building and Grounds Division effective
January 1, 2021 after over 30 years of service; and
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1990, Mr. Poff was hired by Chesterfield County
as a County Maintenance Worker; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Poff continued to learn new skills, which resulted in
reclassification of his position to Trades Assistant, Labor Crew Chief and
ultimately to Facility Maintenance Supervisor; and
WHEREAS, in 2001, Mr. Poff was assigned to provide dedicated
maintenance support for the then new Juvenile and Domestic Relations
Courthouse, one of the County government’s largest facilities; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Poff was responsible for the maintenance of the entire
Juvenile Courthouse, to include scheduling of work orders, preventive
maintenance duties and supervision of contractors, all the while working
closely with the Sheriff’s Office to ensure maintenance activities were
completed without compromising facility security; and
WHEREAS, in 2002, Mr. Poff attained his HVAC Tradesman License; and
WHEREAS, after the retirement of the Facility Maintenance Supervisor
assigned to the Circuit and General District Courthouse, Mr. Poff’s
responsibilities were increased to include both Courthouse buildings and
supervision of trades staff assigned to these facilities; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Poff consistently accomplished his duties in an
exceptional manner while maintaining a positive “can do attitude”; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Poff was “on call” after normal business hours for
virtually his entire career, working tirelessly to ensure the Courthouses
were always in top condition for the administration of justice; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Poff maintained the respect and admiration of all those
working in the Courthouses through his dedication, knowledge, and abilities;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Poff was of great assistance to other Building and Grounds
shops in the completion of renovation projects; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Poff was an invaluable member of the General Services
Building and Grounds team because of his positive attitude, work ethic,
willingness to help others and vast knowledge; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Poff demonstrated his commitment to the County and
contributed to a positive work environment by supporting County goals,
core values and organizational objectives through teamwork and
dependability.
Page 105 of 399
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, this 28th day of April 2021, publicly recognizes the outstanding
contributions of James E. Poff, expresses the appreciation of all citizens
for his service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation for his
dedicated service to the County, congratulations upon his retirement, and
best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented
to Mr. Poff, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the
papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Page 106 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 12.C.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Ms. Crystal A. Alexander, Department of General Services Building and Grounds
Division, Upon Her Retirement
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Crystal A. Alexander retired from the Department of General Services, Buildings and Grounds Division, on
January 1, 2021, after providing over 37 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Attachments:
1.Retirement Resolution-04.28.2021-Building and Grounds-Crystal Alexanderrev
Preparer:Clay Bowles, Director
Approved By:
Page 107 of 399
RECOGNIZING MS. CRYSTAL A. ALEXANDER UPON HER RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Ms. Crystal A. Alexander retired from the Chesterfield County
Department of General Services Building and Grounds Division effective
January 1, 2021 after over 35 years of service; and
WHEREAS, in 1985, Ms. Alexander joined the Chesterfield County
Department of General Services Building and Grounds Division, as a Custodian;
and
WHEREAS, Ms. Alexander provided outstanding custodial services to the
Chesterfield County Courthouses and was dedicated to keeping these buildings
clean, safe, and aesthetically pleasing; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Alexander demonstrated her commitment to the County and
contributed to a positive work environment by her ethical standards of
behavior, teamwork, and professionalism; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Alexander performed her daily tasks with minimal
supervision and promptly handled customer concerns and special requests; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Alexander was self-motivated and consistently presented a
positive image while interacting with internal and external customers; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Alexander fully supported departmental initiatives to
utilize environmentally friendly housekeeping practices and products; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Alexander was always willing to adjust her schedule,
sometimes reporting hours early, to meet the demands of her job and to ensure
that cleaning was completed before the start of the business day; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Alexander was a friend to every person she encountered,
providing a stable and stalwart fixture in a sometimes unsettling
environment; and
WHEREAS, in March 2020, Ms. Alexander was deemed an essential worker
due to the global Coronavirus pandemic, thus making her service to keep the
Juvenile Courthouse as clean and safe as possible even more critical; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Alexander will truly be missed by her co-workers and
customers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, this 28th day of April 2021, publicly recognizes the outstanding
contributions of Crystal A. Alexander, expresses the appreciation of all
citizens for her service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation
for her dedicated service to the County, congratulations upon her retirement,
and best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented
to Ms. Alexander, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the
papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Page 108 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.A.1.
Subject:
Committee on the Future
Board Action Requested:
Nominate and appoint Mr. Dease Moore to serve on the Committee on the Future representing the Dale District
Summary of Information:
The Committee on the Future is a citizen committee appointed by the Board of Supervisors for the purpose of identifying, studying, and making
recommendations on long-range issues impacting the County. It advises the Board on possible changes in governmental structure, revisions to fiscal
and land use planning, and other matters relating to the future provision of services to County citizens.
There are 10 citizen members on the Committee, two from each of the five magisterial districts. Membership terms are open-ended and appointees
serve at the pleasure of the Board. This action is to fill a vacancy in the Dale District; this is the only vacancy on the Committee at present.
Specifically, this action is to nominate and appoint Mr. Dease Moore to fill the current Dale District vacancy. Mr. Holland concurs with the
appointment of Mr. Moore.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees may be nominated and appointed at the same meeting. Nominees
are voted on in the order in which they are nominated.
Attachments:
None
Preparer:Andrea Peeks, Director of Budget and Management
Approved By:
Page 109 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.A.2.
Subject:
Chesterfield Community Services Board
Board Action Requested:
Nominate and appoint Ms. Angelene Smith as a Member At-Large to the Chesterfield Community Services
Board with a term effective May 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023.
Summary of Information:
The Chesterfield Community Services Board is designated as an Administrative/Policy Board for the provision
of public mental health, intellectual/developmental disabilities and substance use disorder services. Ms.
Angelene Smith resides in the Matoaca District and would serve as a Member At-Large. Ms. Smith’s
background and expertise would be valuable to the Board should the Board of Supervisors so choose to appoint
her.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are nominated at one meeting
and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of
the Board members present. Nominees are voted on in the order they are nominated.
Attachments:
None
Preparer:Kelly Fried, Executive Director
Approved By:
Page 110 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.1.a.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Mr. John W. West, Jr., Department of General Services, Building and Grounds
Division, Upon His Retirement
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Mr. West retired from Chesterfield County General Services, Buildings and Grounds Division, after providing
21 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Attachments:
1.John West Jr-rev2
Preparer:Clay Bowles, Director
Approved By:
Page 111 of 399
RECOGNIZING MR. JOHN W. WEST, JR. UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mr. John W. West, Jr. retired from the Chesterfield
County Department of General Services Building and Grounds
Division effective December 1, 2020 after over 20 years of service;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. John W. West, Jr. joined the Chesterfield County,
Department of General Services, Building and Grounds Division on
July 6, 1993 as a Heat and Air Conditioning Technician; and
WHEREAS, after a break in service with Chesterfield County in
1995, Mr. West returned to the County on April 1, 2002 as a HVAC
Mechanic; and
WHEREAS, in 2002, Mr. West was instrumental in initiating a
HVAC Preventive Maintenance Program; and
WHEREAS, in 2004, Mr. West graduated from the School of
Quality and Continuous Improvement; and
WHEREAS, in 2006, Mr. West was promoted to HVAC Lead Mechanic;
and
WHEREAS, in 2006, Mr. West graduated from the Employee
Leadership Institute; and
WHEREAS, in 2006, Mr. West was recognized by Chesterfield
County Fire and Emergency Medical Services for his life saving
response to a vehicle accident; and
WHEREAS, in 2007, Mr. West graduated from the Supervisory
Leadership Institute; and
WHEREAS, in 2007, Mr. West was honored to speak at the
Chesterfield University graduation ceremony in recognition of his
achievements and commitment to ongoing training and education; and
WHEREAS, in 2008, Mr. West and his team were recognized for
their innovative idea, “Sharing the Knowledge” in a cost savings
“Success Story,” which initiated the concept of “bring back and
train”; and
WHEREAS, in 2012, Mr. West was reclassified to the position
of Mechanical Systems Supervisor; and
Page 112 of 399
WHEREAS, Mr. West led the way in creating training
opportunities for the HVAC Shop as part of assisting in the
development of a HVAC Career Development Plan that has positively
impacted the recruitment and retention of knowledgeable and
skilled HVAC technicians; and
WHEREAS, Mr. West always shared his knowledge of the HVAC
field and created a room dedicated to reference materials on
technical and administrative data, which has been named the “John
West Library”; and
WHEREAS, Mr. West assisted in initiating a program for the
recovery, cleaning, and reclaiming of refrigerant from old
equipment, which was a “Success Story” and continues to be a cost
savings to the County; and
WHEREAS, Mr. West always projected a positive and
enthusiastic attitude and received numerous appreciations for
working diligently to ensure the comfort of all County employees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of
Mr. John W. West, Jr., expresses the appreciation of all residents
for his service to Chesterfield County, and extends appreciation
for his dedicated service to the County and congratulations upon
his retirement, as well as best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
Page 113 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.1.b.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Lieutenant William J. Jeffords Jr, Fire and Emergency Medical Services, Upon His
Retirement
Board Action Requested:
The adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Lieutenant William J. Jeffords Jr retired from the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department after
having provided 20 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Attachments:
1.Consent, Jeffords, William J. (LT) 3.2021
Preparer:Ethel White, Human Resources Specialist
Approved By:
Page 114 of 399
RECOGNIZING LIEUTENANT WILLIAM J. JEFFORDS, JR UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Lieutenant William J. “Bill” Jeffords, Jr. will
retire from the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Department, Chesterfield County, on March 1, 2021; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords attended Recruit School #30 in
2001 and has faithfully served the county for twenty years in
various assignments as a firefighter at the Chester and Centralia
stations; and as a lieutenant at the Midlothian, Swift Creek,
Centralia, Clover Hill, Courthouse, and Phillip’s fire stations.
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords was awarded an EMS Unit Citation
for his role in treating a patient that was having a severe asthma
attack; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords was awarded an EMS Unit Citation
for his role in the resuscitation of a cardiac arrest victim; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords was awarded a Lifesave award for
the resuscitation of a pediatric drowning victim; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords was awarded an EMS Unit Citation
and a Lifesave award for his role in treating and saving the life
of a patient with severe burns; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords was awarded a Lifesave award for
his role in treating a patient with a severe asthma attack; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords was awarded a Medal of Valor and
a Lifesave award for his heroic actions in rescuing multiple
occupants during Tropical Storm Gaston at Swift Creek Apartments;
and
Page 115 of 399
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords was selected as the Outstanding
Career Firefighter of the Year in 2004; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords was awarded a Dive Team Unit
Citation for his role in the search of drowning victims in the
Swift Creek Reservoir; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords received a commendation from the
Chesterfield County Chief of Police for his role as a Tactical
Medic; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords served as the Self-Contained
Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Replacement Project Manager and
successfully completed the purchase of the department’s new SCBA
and SCUBA equipment; and
WHEREAS, Lieutenant Jeffords served as the lead instructor
for the inaugural Chesterfield Technical Center Fire Cadet
Program; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Lieutenant
William J. “Bill” Jeffords, Jr, expresses the appreciation of all
citizens for his service to the county, and extends their
appreciation for his dedicated service and their congratulations
upon his retirement.
Page 116 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.1.c.
Subject:
Resolution of Support for the Proposed Bailey Bridge Connector Alignment
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution of support for the proposed Bailey Bridge Connector
alignment.
Summary of Information:
On January 24, 2018, the Board adopted a resolution endorsing the appropriation of funds in anticipation of
VDOT Smart Scale and secondary road funds for the construction of a connection between Bailey Bridge Road
and Brad McNeer Parkway, referred to as the Bailey Bridge Connector. Preliminary engineering for the project
began in 2019, and a Citizen Information Meeting was held on October 3, 2019. The intent of the meeting was
to provide an overview of the project and to solicit input on three alignment alternatives. Chesterfield used the
input from the meeting to determine a Locally Preferred Alternative.
A virtual public hearing was held on October 29, 2020, presenting a further developed plan for Alignment #2,
the Locally Preferred Alternative.
A total of 51 citizens provided comment via the project website. Based on citizen feedback there is general
support for the project, with 28 of the 51 citizens expressing overall support of the project, 12 not supporting
the project, and 11 expressing a neutral opinion.
The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) is required to approve the proposed location or alignment of
the Bailey Bridge Connector. A resolution of support from the county is requested for consideration by the
CTB.
Attachments:
1.AttA_BaileyBrConnResolutionSupport
2.AttB_Bailey_Bridge_Connector_Locally_Preferred_Alternative
3.AttC_Agen996 Bailey Bridge Connector (BBC) Appropriate and Authorize
Preparer:Brent Epps, Director of Transportation
Page 117 of 399
Approved By:
Page 118 of 399
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2018, the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors approved a resolution endorsing the appropriation
of funds in anticipation of VDOT Smart Scale and Secondary Road
Funds for the construction of a connection between Bailey Bridge
Road and Brad McNeer Parkway.
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County documented a Locally Preferred
Alternative based on input received at a Citizen Information
Meeting held on October 3, 2019; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County documented a Locally Preferred
Alternative based on input received at a Citizen Information
Meeting held on October 3, 2019, where citizens were provided an
overview of the project, three alignment alternatives, and an
opportunity to provide input on a preferred alignment; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County advertised and held a virtual
public meeting, referred to as a Location Public Hearing on
October 29, 2020 to provide additional detail on the preferred
alignment; and
WHEREAS, a total of 51 citizens commented on the virtual
Location Public Hearing via the website or direct email to the
Chesterfield Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, based on citizen feedback there is general support
for the project, with 28 of the 51 citizens expressing overall
support of the project, 12 not supporting the project, and 11
expressing a neutral opinion; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
of Chesterfield County hereby endorses and supports the proposed
Bailey Bridge Connector alignment.
Page 119 of 399
BAILEY BRIDGE CONNECTOR
B
A
I
L
E
Y
B
R
I
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
B
AI
L
E
Y
B
RI
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
HIGH SCHOOL
MANCHESTER
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ALBERTA SMITH
C
E
N
T
R
E
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y
C
O
M M O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
BRAD McNEER PARKWAY
B
A
T
T
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
D
R
I
V
E
C
A
M
E
R
O
N
B
A
Y
D
RI
V
E
SUBDIVISION
CAMERON BAY
SUBDIVISION
WEST
BAYHILL POINTE
SUBDIVISION
AT SWIFT CREEK
THE TERRACES
V A
R
O
U
T
E
2
8
8
S
O
U
T
H
B
O
U
N
D
V A
R
O
U
T
E
2
8
8
N
O
R
T
H
B
O
U
N
D
S
WIF
T C
R
E
E
K
S
W
I
F
T
C
R
E
E
K
These plans are unfinished and unapproved and are not to be used for any type of construction or the acquisition of Right of Way.
BAILEY BRIDGE CONNECTOR - Chesterfield County, Virginia - UPC 111713
Q
U
AI
L
W
O
O
D
R
O
A
D
P A
R
K
W A
Y
H
O
L L Y
V
I E W
S
P
R
I N
G
T
R
A
C
E
D
R
I V
E
N
0
SCALE
150'300'450'600'
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
http://www.streamlinechesterfield.com
PARCELS
EASEMENTS
FLOODPLAIN
TRANSMISSION POLE
DOMINION ENERGY
BRIDGE
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
Project Location
Legend
Contact Information
Virginia
Chesterfield County,
FaulknerC@chesterfield.gov
Comments may also be sent to:
Chesterfield, VA 23832
P.O. Box 40
9800 Government Center Parkway
Chesterfield County Department of Transportation
Chessa Faulkner, P.E.
Imagery courtesy of VGIN, copyright 2017
plans.
relocations may be required beyond the proposed right-of-way shown on these
of construction or the acquisition of right of way. Additional easements for utility
These plans are unfinished and unapproved and are not to be used for any type
UPC 111713
State Project Number:
Chesterfield, Virginia
Bailey Bridge Connector
North Arrow & Scale
SUBDIVISION
DEER RUN
SUBDIVISION
SPRING TRACE
HILL ROADBAILEY ROADTURNERVILLE
SUBDIVISION
BAYHILL POINTE
COMMONS
SWIFT CREEK
LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
Locally Preferred Alternative - December 17, 2019
H
U
L
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
R
O
A
D
V
A
R
O
U
T
E
2
8
8
B
R
I
D
G
E
R
O
A
D
B
A
I
L
E
Y
C
E
N
T
R
E
P
K
W
Y
C
O
M M O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
P
K
W
Y
B
R
A
D
M
C
N
E
E
R
CL
SHOULDERSHOULDERLANELANESHARED USE PATH DITCH
CL
LANE LANE SHOULDERSHOULDER
1'2'
PATH
SHARED USE
2'10'2'8'8'
1'
12'
75'
12'8'
1'
34'
2'8'8'12'12'8'
21'
PEDESTRIAN FENCE
35 MPH DESIGN SPEED
ROAD WITH SHARED USE PATH
BAILEY BRIDGE CONNECTOR
35 MPH DESIGN SPEED
BRIDGE WITH SHARED USE PATH
BAILEY BRIDGE CONNECTOR
R/W R/W
OVERALL LOCATION MAP
TYPICAL SECTIONS
September 30, 2020
Walker, P.E.
WalkerCh@chesterfield.gov
Page 120 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2
AGENDA
Meeting Date: January 24, 2018 Item Number:
Subject:
Public Hearing to Consider the Appropriation of Funds and Authorization to
Proceed with the Bailey Bridge Road-Brad McNeer Parkway Connector Project
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: ____________________________________________
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to hold a public hearing to consider the appropriation
of $22,960,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements and authorize the County
Administrator to enter into all appropriate agreements and contracts and
proceed with design and right-of-way acquisition for the Bailey Bridge Road-
Brad McNeer Parkway Connector Project.
Summary of Information:
The Bailey Bridge Road-Brad McNeer Parkway Connector Project is funded with
SMART SCALE and secondary road construction funds. No county funds are
involved with this project.
In order to accelerate the project, staff proposes to manage the associated
design, right-of-way acquisition and construction activities. As a result,
a VDOT/County design/right-of-way/construction agreement, similar to those
the county has executed in the past, will be necessary. Under the terms of
the agreement, the county will perform the various activities and be
reimbursed by VDOT. Anticipated VDOT reimbursements, $22,960,000, need to be
appropriated to the project.
(Continued on next page)
Preparer: Jesse W. Smith Title: Director of Transportation
Agen996
Preparer: Matt Harris Title: Director of Budget and Management
Attachments:
Yes
No
#
Page 121 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2
AGENDA
Summary of Information: (Continued)
The amount of anticipated VDOT reimbursements which need to be appropriated
by the Board is greater than one percent of the county budget; therefore, a
public hearing must be held to take this action.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the Board hold a public hearing to consider the following
actions for the Bailey Bridge Road-Brad McNeer Parkway Connector Project:
1. Appropriate $22,960,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements;
2. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary
VDOT/County agreements/contracts, permits/mitigation agreements, and
surety agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney;
3. Authorize the County Administrator to proceed with the design and right-
of-way acquisition, including advertisement of an eminent domain public
hearing if necessary and to accept the conveyance of right-of-way and
easements that are acquired;
4. Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and County
Administrator to execute easement agreements for relocation of
utilities; and
5. Authorize the Director of Purchasing to proceed with the advertisement
of a construction contract for the project.
Page 122 of 399
Page 123 of 399
Bailey Bridge Road-Brad McNeer Parkway Connector Project
PROJECT BUDGET
Date Source Amount
1/24/18
PROPOSED: Anticipated VDOT Reimbursements
(SMART SCALE: $21.64 M and
Secondary Road Construction: $1.32 M)
$ 22,960,000
TOTAL $ 22,960,000
PROJECT ESTIMATE
Preliminary Engineering $2,000,000
Right-of-Way & Utility Relocation $9,500,000
Construction $11,460,000
Total $22,960,000
Page 124 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.1.d.
Subject:
Resolution Approving the Request of Bon Secours Critical Care Transport to Operate Non-Emergency
Ambulance Service
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to adopt a resolution approving the request of Bon Secours to operate a non-emergency
transport service in Chesterfield County.
Summary of Information:
Bon Secours is requesting that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution approving its operation of a non-
emergency ambulance transport service in Chesterfield County. In accordance with state law, Bon Secours
must have Board approval in order to establish a medical service transport operation whose only purpose will
be to provide non-emergency transportation to nursing homes, assisted living facilities, dialysis centers,
physician's offices and hospitals. Bon Secours will not be a component of the County's EMS response system,
and it will have no effect on the county's emergency response operations, including volunteer rescue squad
operations. Bon Secours will not respond to calls for emergency medical services, but will, instead, refer those
to be county's 911 system.
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.
Attachments:
1.Bon Secours Critical Care Transport Resolution 4.28.21
Preparer:Loy Senter, Fire Chief
Approved By:
Page 125 of 399
WHEREAS, Bon Secours Critical Care Transport is requesting
approval to establish and operate a non-emergency ambulance
transport service in Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the County has received a letter from Bon Secours
Critical Care Transport stating that this approval is required for
compliance with the State Board of Health, Virginia EMS
Regulations, Section 12 VAC 5-31-420; and
WHEREAS, Bon Secours Critical Care Transport will not be part
of the County’s emergency response system or a designated response
agency for Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Bon Secours Critical Care Transport has developed
dispatch policies to ensure that emergency calls are referred to
a 911 system and that it will only conduct non-emergency
transports.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby approves the request of Bon Secours
Critical Care Transport to establish and operate a non-emergency
ambulance transport service in Chesterfield County.
Page 126 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.1.e.
Subject:
Resolution Approving Richmond Regional Planning District Commission (“RRPDC”) Charter Amendments
and Approving a Multiple Voting and Alternate Voting Structure
Board Action Requested:
Staff recommends that the Board 1) adopt the attached resolution to approve the attached RRPDC Charter
amendments and 2) approve the multiple voting and alternate voting structure described in this agenda item.
Summary of Information:
The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission (“RRPDC” and also known as “Plan RVA”) is a
regional planning entity created under the Virginia Area Development and Regional Cooperation Acts to
promote the “orderly and efficient development” of the region designated as Planning District 15. The
localities which comprise the RRPDC region include the Counties of Chesterfield, Henrico, Hanover, New
Kent, Goochland, Powhatan and Charles City; the City of Richmond and the Town of Ashland. RRPDC
concentrates on community development, transportation, environmental stewardship and emergency
management in the region. While every Chesterfield magisterial district falls within the RRPDC geographic
area, small portions of the Matoaca and Bermuda Magisterial Districts fall within the Crater Planning District
Commission area and the County is a member of both commissions.
RRPDC operates under a charter which is similar to corporate articles of incorporation. Decisions of RRPDC
are made by votes cast by representatives of the nine member jurisdictions. The voting strength of each
member jurisdiction is calculated based on the population of the jurisdiction. A few years ago the RRPDC
member jurisdictions began discussing possible amendments to the Charter to change the voting strength of the
larger member jurisdictions and to allow the Board to designate a member to cast multiple votes on behalf of
other members (“multiple voting”).
Although a consensus could not be reached on the voting strength issue, the nine member jurisdictions have
reached a consensus to amend the Charter to permit multiple and alternate voting. The attached Charter
amendment reflects this consensus and makes some other stylistic and wording changes that are non-
substantive. These proposed amendments must be approved by all nine member jurisdictions to be effective.
Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached resolution to approve the amendments.
Under the Charter amendments, the Board is authorized to designate a member of the Board as a multiple voter
who can cast the votes of other Board members as well as an alternate voter. After discussion with individual
Page 127 of 399
Board members, staff recommends 1) that Mr. Winslow be designated as the multiple voting Board member
who is authorized to cast votes on behalf of any Board member who is not in attendance at an RRPDC meeting;
2) that Mr. Holland be designated as the multiple voting alternate for Mr. Winslow whenever Mr. Winslow is
absent from an RRPDC meeting such that Mr. Holland will then be authorized to cast votes for any Board
member not in attendance at that meeting.
Attachments:
1.2021-04-28-RRPDC - Plan RVA - Ratification
2.RRPDC Charter - draft rev. 9 CLEAN 02-09-2021
Preparer:Jeff Mincks, County Attorney
Approved By:
Page 128 of 399
PLANRVA/RICHMOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
CONCURRING RESOLUTION FOR MEMBER JURISDICTIONS TO RATIFY
AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARTER AGREEMENT
It is hereby RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County that
the amendments to the Charter Agreement of the Richmond Regional Planning
District Commission submitted to the member jurisdictions for consideration are
approved and ratified and the Charter is readopted in full, as presented.
Page 129 of 399
CHARTER AGREEMENT
OF THE
RICHMOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
This Charter Agreement to organize a Planning District Commission made this 14th day
of August, 1969, by and between the undersigned member jurisdictions as authorized by the
Virginia Area Development Act (Title 15.1, Chapter 34, Sections 15.1-1400, et seq., Code of
Virginia (1950), as amended), and subsequently amended this day of
, 2021 as authorized by the Regional Cooperation Act, Chapter 42 of Title 15.2 of the
Code of Virginia (as amended) (Va. Code § 15.2-4200, et seq.):
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed that:
ARTICLE I
Name, Location, Authority, Purpose
Section 1
The name of this organization shall be the Richmond Regional Planning District
Commission, hereinafter called the "COMMISSION."
Section 2
The office of the COMMISSION shall be centrally located within Planning District 15.
Section 3
The COMMISSION shall be a public body corporate and politic with all the powers and
duties granted to it by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia including the Regional
Cooperation Act.
Section 4
The purpose of the COMMISSION shall be to promote the orderly and efficient
development of the physical, social, and economic elements of Planning District 15 by
planning and encouraging and assisting member jurisdictions to plan for the future.
ARTICLE II
Membership
Section 1
COMMISSION members shall be appointed by the respective governing bodies of those
member jurisdictions which are parties to this Charter Agreement provided, however, that
at least a majority, but not substantially more than a majority, of the COMMISSION's
members shall be elected officials of the governing bodies of the member jurisdictions
Page 130 of 399
RRPDC Charter
Page 2
within the Planning District with each participating county, city, and town of more than
3,500 population having at least one representative, and the other members being
qualified voters and residents of the District who hold no office elected by the people.
Section 2
Member jurisdictions which are parties to this Charter Agreement shall appoint members
to the COMMISSION to represent the number of voting seats on the following basis:
Number and Type of Voting Seats
Governin
g
Planning
Population Body Commissio
n
Citize
n
3,501 -7,500 1 --
7,501 -25,000 1 1 -
25,001 -50,000 2 1 -
50,001 -100,00
0
2 1 1
100,001 -175,00
0
3 1 1
175,001 -250,00
0
4 1 1
250,001 -and up 5 1 1
Appointed Governing Body members may represent more than one Governing Body
voting seat if authorized by the member jurisdiction. Governing Body members are the
only members eligible to represent more than one voting seat for the member jurisdiction.
For purposes of defining population of a jurisdiction under the terms of this Section, the
numbers to be used will be the latest of the official U.S. Census count or the most recent
preliminary population estimate prepared by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public
Service at the University of Virginia.
Section 3
Vacancies on the COMMISSION shall be filled for the unexpired term in the same
manner as the original appointment was made.
Section 4
Any member of the COMMISSION shall be eligible for reappointment but may be
Page 131 of 399
RRPDC Charter
Page 3
removed for cause by the governing body which appointed him.
Section 5
Each governing body belonging to the COMMISSION may appoint an alternate member
who is also an elected official of the governing body to the COMMISSION who may
serve in lieu of one of the elected officials of that governing body. An alternate member
shall only serve in the absence of the designated governing body official and when
serving in this capacity, shall hold the same voting authority as the designated governing
body official.
ARTICLE III
Terms of Office and Voting Rights
Section 1
The terms of office of COMMISSION members shall be determined by the respective
governing body. The terms of alternate members shall be coincident with the terms of
office of their designated member of the governing body.
Section 2
Each member of the COMMISSION shall have one equal vote in all matters before the
COMMISSION unless designated to represent more than one voting seat by the
appointing member jurisdiction.
Section 3
Each alternate member appointed to the COMMISSION shall hold the same voting
authority as the designated governing body official.
ARTICLE IV
Officers
Section 1
Officers of the COMMISSION shall consist of a Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Treasurer,
and Secretary who shall be elected by a majority of the voting seats of the
COMMISSION.
Section 2
The Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Treasurer, and Secretary shall be elected for terms of one
year.
Section 3
Page 132 of 399
RRPDC Charter
Page 4
The Chairman shall not be eligible to serve consecutive terms. No member jurisdiction
shall have more than one representative serving as a COMMISSION officer except that
the Treasurer, when reelected for a consecutive term, may serve even though another
COMMISSION officer is from the same member jurisdiction.
Section 4
The COMMISSION shall appoint an Executive Director who shall be an employee of the
COMMISSION and shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the voting seats.
ARTICLE V
Addition, Withdrawal, or Removal of Member Jurisdictions
Section 1
Any member jurisdiction within Planning District Number 15 which is not a party to this
Charter Agreement at the effective date thereof may, thereafter, join the COMMISSION
provided that such member jurisdiction is eligible for membership and that it adopts and
executes this Agreement.
Section 2
Any member jurisdiction may withdraw from the COMMISSION by submitting to the
COMMISSION in writing a notice of intent to withdraw. Such withdrawal shall not
become effective until the end of the COMMISSION's then current fiscal year.
Section 3
Any member jurisdiction which is a party to this Agreement, shall automatically cease to
be a member of the COMMISSION if it fails to comply with ARTICLE VI of this
Agreement.
ARTICLE VI
Financial Obligations of Member Jurisdictions
Section 1
All member jurisdictions within Planning District Number 15 which are a party to this
Charter Agreement shall contribute funds to the COMMISSION in accordance with an
Annual Budget approved prior to the beginning of the COMMISSION'S fiscal year,
provided that said Annual Budget is adopted by the affirmative vote of three-fourths (3/4)
of the voting seats present and voting.
Section 2
Page 133 of 399
RRPDC Charter
Page 5
In the event that the dues of a member jurisdiction are based on an estimate of population
for that jurisdiction, the population estimate to be utilized will be the latest of the official
U.S. Census count or the most recent preliminary population estimate prepared by the
Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service at the University of Virginia.
Section 3
The local contribution of each member jurisdiction is due on July 1 of the current fiscal
year and shall be paid in a single lump sum payment by each member jurisdiction prior to
July 31 of that year.
Section 4
An additional assessment may be made upon a member jurisdiction for particular services
of a local nature, which are requested by said member jurisdiction and which may or may
not be included in the Work Program adopted by the COMMISSION. This assessment
shall be agreed upon with the appropriate member jurisdiction.
ARTICLE VII
Appointment of an Executive Committee and Adoption of Bylaws
Section 1
The COMMISSION may designate an Executive Committee and delegate to it such
powers as the COMMISSION may determine, provided that these powers are not
inconsistent with provisions of the Regional Cooperation Act, Chapter 42 of Title 15.2 of
the Code of Virginia (as amended) (Va. Code § 15.2-4200, et seq.). Said powers will be
specifically stated in the Bylaws of the Commission.
Section 2
The COMMISSION may adopt Bylaws and such other rules as it deems necessary to
govern its operations.
ARTICLE VIII
Meetings
Section 1
The COMMISSION shall hold regular meetings on a schedule which will be determined
by the membership.
Section 2
Meetings of the COMMISSION and its committees shall be open to the public as
Page 134 of 399
RRPDC Charter
Page 6
provided by the Virginia Freedom of Information Act.
ARTICLE IX
Amendments
Section 1
This Charter Agreement may be amended, supplemented, or superseded only by
concurring resolutions of all member jurisdictions of the COMMISSION. All proposed
amendments shall be submitted to the COMMISSION for its review and comment and to
the member jurisdictions for consideration.
ARTICLE X
Date of Organization
Section 1
The organization of the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission shall be
effective on the 31st day of August, 1969, or at such time after this date when the Charter
Agreement has been adopted and signed by that member jurisdictions whose population
when added to the aggregate population of those who have already adopted and signed
the Charter Agreement embraces the majority of the population within Planning District
Number 15.
* * * * *
Amendments Adopted By
Richmond Regional Planning District Commission
September 14, 1989
and
Final Ratification by All Nine Local Governments
January 10, 1990
Amendments Adopted By
Richmond Regional Planning District Commission
Month Day, 2021
and
Final Ratification by All Nine Local Governments
Month Day, 2021
Page 135 of 399
RRPDC Charter
Page 7
RATIFIED BY THE RICHMOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT
COMMISSION’S
MEMBER JURISDICTIONS ON THE DATES INDICATED
MEMBER JURISDICTION DATE OF
RATIFICATION
CHARLES CITY COUNTY:
By:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY:
By:
CITY OF RICHMOND
By:
GOOCHLAND COUNTY
By:
HANOVER COUNTY
By:
Page 136 of 399
RRPDC Charter
Page 8
RATIFIED BY THE RICHMOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT
COMMISSION’S
MEMBER JURISDICTIONS ON THE DATES INDICATED
MEMBER JURISDICTION DATE OF
RATIFICATION
HENRICO COUNTY
By:
NEW KENT COUNTY
By:
POWHATAN COUNTY
By:
TOWN OF ASHLAND
By:
Page 137 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.2.a.1.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Jefferson Davis Highway and Sand Hills Drive from Primax
Properties, LLC
Board Action Requested:
Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.237 acres adjacent to Jefferson Davis Highway and
Sand Hills Drive from Primax Properties, LLC and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.237 acres
adjacent to Jefferson Davis Highway and Sand Hills Drive from Primax Properties, LLC. This conveyance is
for the development of Tractor Supply Jefferson Davis Highway and has been reviewed by the site plan team.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.Primax Properties LLC Dedication Sketch
2.Primax Properties LLC Dedication Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 138 of 399
S I -9 5
N
I
-
9
5
J
E
F
F
E
R
S
O
N
D
A
V
I
S
H
W
Y
M
O
Y
A
R
D
R
W
E
I
R
P
L
S A N D H I L L S D R
EXECUTIVE DR
W E I R R D
C I C E R O P K W Y
N
I
L
E
R
D
E
V
E
L
Y
N
D
R
P I N E M E A D O W S C I R
O L D B E R M U D A H U N D R E D R D
S W I F T R U N R D
J O H N T Y L E R D R
J
E
F
F
E
R
S
O
N
D
A
V
I
S
H
W
Y
J O H N T Y L E R D R
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Jefferson Davis Highway and Sand Hills Drive from Primax Properties, LLC
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
0.237 Acre Dedicatio n
Page 139 of 399
Page 140 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.2.a.2.
Subject:
Acceptance of Parcels of Land Adjacent to Happy Hill Road from Abundant Life Church of Deliverance, Inc.
Board Action Requested:
Accept the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total of 0.169 acres adjacent to Happy Hill Road from
Abundant Life Church of Deliverance, Inc. and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of parcels of land containing a total of 0.169
acres adjacent to Happy Hill Road from Abundant Life Church of Deliverance, Inc. This conveyance is for the
development of Abundant Life Church of Deliverance and has been reviewed by the site plan team.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.Abundant Life Church of Deliverance Dedication Sketch
2.Abundant Life Church of Deliverance Dedication Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 141 of 399
HAPPY HILL RD
F I E L D I N G R D
M I S T W O O D F O R E S T D R
L O G A N W O O D D R
T A L L E Y W O O D L N
L O R I M E R R D
SONNENBURG DR
M A R T I N G A L E R D
LEDGE
W
O
O
D DR
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Acceptance of Parcels of Land Adjacent to Happy Hill Road from Abundant Life Church of Deliverance, Inc.
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
0.056 Acre Parcel to be Quitclaimedto the County of Chesterfield
0.113 Acre Parcel to be Dedicatedto the County of Chesterfield
Page 142 of 399
P
L
A
N
N
E
R
S
/
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
/
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
S
/
S
U
R
V
E
Y
O
R
S
R
O
A
N
O
K
E
/
R
I
C
H
M
O
N
D
/
N
E
W
R
I
V
E
R
V
A
L
L
E
Y
/
S
T
A
U
N
T
O
N
/
H
A
R
R
I
S
O
N
B
U
R
G
/
L
Y
N
C
H
B
U
R
G
DATE:SCALE: 1" =JOB:DRAWN BY:CMF 56190010.00 30'03-19-2021CHECKED BY:CMFSHEET OF0101
1
5
8
7
1
C
i
t
y
V
i
e
w
D
r
i
v
e
,
S
u
i
t
e
2
0
0
/
M
i
d
l
o
t
h
i
a
n
,
V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
2
3
1
1
3
/
P
h
o
n
e
(
8
0
4
)
7
9
4
-
0
5
7
1
/
w
w
w
.
b
a
l
z
e
r
.
c
c
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
0
3
-
1
9
-
2
0
2
1
j:\19\50\56\56190010.00 abundant life church\survey\drawings\56190010 rw dedication.dwg
CO. PL
A
N
#
2
0
P
R
0
1
4
5
CO. PR
O
J
#
1
9
-
0
2
2
2
P
a
g
e
1
4
3
o
f
3
9
9
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.2.a.3.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike from QSR Realty Partners LC
Board Action Requested:
Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.035 acres adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike from QSR
Realty Partners LC and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.035 acres
adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike from QSR Realty Partners LC. This conveyance is for the development of
Popeye’s Charter Colony and has been reviewed by the site plan team.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.QSR Realty Partners LC Dedication Sketch
2.QSR Realty Partners LC Dedication Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 144 of 399
MIDLOTHIAN TPKE
WESTFIELD RD
L E G O R D O N D R
C H A R T E R C O L O N Y P K W Y
WINTERFIELD LN
MARTINET XING
V I L L A G E M I L L D R
N CARRIAGE LN
VILLAGE PLACE DR
W I N T E R V I E W P K W Y
W
I
N
T
E
R
H
A
R
V
E
S
T
R
D
W
I
N
T
E
R
L
A
K
E
D
R
LALEE RD
T O W E R L I G H T R D
C R O F T O N V I L L A G E T R C E
B L U E G R A S S R D
W
I
N
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
R
D
W
I
N
T
E
R
L
A
K
E
C
T
MIDLOTHIAN TPKE
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike from QSR Realty Partners LC
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
0.035 Acre Dedicatio n
Page 145 of 399
Page 146 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.2.a.4.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land on Bermuda Hundred Road from the Economic Development Authority
Board Action Requested:
Accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 2.05 +/- acres on Bermuda Hundred Road from the
Economic Development Authority and authorize the County Administrator to execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 2.05 +/- acres
on Bermuda Hundred Road from the Economic Development Authority. This conveyance is for the future site
of the Enon Water Tank. This tank is included in the Utilities Department Capital Improvement Program.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.EDA Dedication Vicinity Sketch
2.Property Map
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 147 of 399
B E R M U D A H U N D R E D R D
B U R G E S S R D
N E N O N C H U R C H R D
E H
U
N
D
R
E
D R
D
COLE ST
I R V E N W A Y L N
P E R K I N S O N D R
M
E
A
D
O
W
V
I
L
L
E
T
E
C
H
P
K
W
Y
N E N O N C H U R C H R D
E H
U
N
D
R
E
D R
D
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Acceptance of a Parcel of Land on Bermuda Hundred Roadfrom the Economic Development Authority
Chesterfield CountyDepartment of Utilities
1 inch = 600 feetsasekd 04-08-2021
µ
2.05 +/- Acre Dedication
Page 148 of 399
B E R M U D A H U N D R E D R D
N E N O N C H U R C H R D
Chesterfield CountyDepartment of Utilities
1 inch = 200 feetsasekd 04-08-2021
µ
Economic Development AuthorityParts of P IN: 8266512131and 82565135142.05 +/- Acre Dedication
Page 149 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.2.b.1.
Subject:
Request to Quitclaim Portions of a 20' Drainage Easement (Private), SWMBMP Easements, a 20’ SWMBMP
Access Easement and a 20’ Ingress and Egress Easement Across the Properties of Super Radiator Coils
Limited Partnership
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed
to vacate portions of a 20’ drainage easement (private), SWMBMP easements, a 20’ SWMBMP access
easement and a 20’ ingress and egress easement across the properties of Super Radiator Coils Limited
Partnership.
Summary of Information:
Super Radiator Coils Limited Partnership has requested the vacation of portions of a 20’ drainage easement
(private), SWMBMP easements, a 20’ SWMBMP access easement and a 20’ ingress and egress easement as
shown on the attached plat. This request is for the development of Super Radiator Building Addition and has
been reviewed by Environmental Engineering. New easements will be dedicated.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.Super Radiator Coils Quitclaim Sketch
2.Super Radiator Coils Quitclaim Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 150 of 399
N C
O
U
R
T
H
O
U
S
E R
D
SOUTHLAKE BLVD
TRADE RDB
R
A
N
C
H
W
A
Y
R
D
R
E
S
E
A
R
C
H
R
D
E D E N B E R R Y D R
N
C
O
U
R
T
H
O
U
S
E
R
D
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Request to Quitclaim Portions of a 20’ D rainage Easement (Private), SWMBMP Easements, a 20’ SWMBMP Access Easement and a 20’ Ingress and Egress Easement Across the Properties of Super Radiator Coils Limited Partnership
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
SWMB MP Easemen ts to be Quitclaimed
Drainage Easement(Private) to be Quitclaimed
Drain ag e Easemen t (Private) to be Quitclaimed
SWMB MP A ccess Easementand Ingress/Egress Easementto be Quitclaimed
Page 151 of 399
Page 152 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.2.b.2.
Subject:
Request to Vacate and Rededicate a 16’ Water Easement Across the Property of Greenyard Storage, LLC
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to execute an agreement to vacate and
rededicate a 16’ water easement across the property of Greenyard Storage, LLC.
Summary of Information:
Greenyard Storage, LLC has requested the relocation of a 16’ water easement across its property as shown on
the attached plat. This request has been reviewed by the Utilities Department.
Approval is recommended
Attachments:
1.Greenyard Storage LLC Vacate and Rededicate Water Easement Sketch
2.Greenyard Storage LLC Vacate and Rededicate Water Easement - Rededicate Plat
3.Greenyard Storage LLC Vacate and Rededicate Water Easement - Vacate Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 153 of 399
I
R
O
N
B
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
G R E E N Y A R D R D
M
E
M
O
R
Y
L
N
CO U R T Y A R D R D
C H E S T E R F I E L D M E A D O W S D R
G R E E N Y A R D W A Y
I
R
O
N
B
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Request to Vacate and Rededicate a 16’ Water Easement Across the Property of Greenyard Storage, LLC
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
Water Easement to be Vacated and Rededicated
Page 154 of 399
Page 155 of 399
Page 156 of 399
Page 157 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.2.b.3.
Subject:
Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 16’ Drainage Easement Across 14601 Hancock Village Street
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed
to vacate a portion of a 16’ drainage easement across 14601 Hancock Village Street.
Summary of Information:
EDCO LLC has requested the vacation of a portion of a 16’ drainage easement as shown on the attached plat.
This request is for the development of Hancock Village Phase II Retail and has been reviewed by
Environmental Engineering. New easements will be dedicated.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.Hancock Village Phase II Drainage Easement Quitclaim Sketch
2.Hancock Village Phase II Drainage Easement Quitclaim Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 158 of 399
H U L L S T R E E T R D
W I N T E R P O C K R D
ASHBROOK PKWY
H A N C O C K V I L L A G E S T
RM 2
A S H L A K E P K W Y
H A N C O C K T O W N S D R
D
U
C
K
R
I
D
G
E
B
L
V
D
MC ENNALLY RD
H
A
N
C
O
C
K
V
I
L
L
A
G
E
D
R
L
A
K
E
H
A
R
B
O
U
R
D
R
H A N C O C K F A R M L N
R O L L I N G F I E L D S P L
H
A
N
C
O
C
K
T
O
W
N
S
C
T H A N C O C K C H A S E C T
H U L L S T R E E T R D
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 16’ D rainage Easement Across 14601 H ancock Village Street
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
Portion of a 16' Drain ag e Easement to be Quitclaimed
Page 159 of 399
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
D.B. 8011, PG. 336
723-670-2171
EDCO LLC
D.B. 6863, PG. 384
P.B. 218, PG. 14
722-670-5169
14601 Hancock Village St.
COLE MT CHFLD (HANCOCK) VA LLC
D.B. 10209, PG. 871
722-670-0583
N:3,670,501.41
E:11,722,719.79L1
(TI
E
)
L
2
(
T
I
E
)
L
3
(
T
I
E
)
16' WATER EASE
M
E
N
T
(
D
.
B
.
7
9
9
1
,
P
G
.
1
0
1
)
L
4
L5
L
6
L7
16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT (D.B. 12220, PG. 735)
16' WATER EASEMENT (D.B. 7991, PG. 101)
20' SWM/BMP ACCESS EASEMENT
(D.B. 11881, PG. 710)
VAR. WIDTH BIORETENTION SWM/BMP EASEMENT
(D.B. 11881, PG. 710)
VAR. WIDTH SEWER & WATER
EASEMENT (D.B. 7991, PG. 77)
16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT (D.B. 12220, PG. 735)
N:3,670,567.96
E:11,722,693.08
N:3,670,668.01
E:11,722,678.91
N:3,670,668.67
E:11,722,685.53
N:3,670,568.27
E:11,722,696.01
PORTION OF 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
TO BE QUITCLAIMED
484.56 SQFT.
0.011 AC.
PL
P L
P L
16' WATER EASE
M
E
N
T
(
D
.
B
.
1
0
8
9
5
,
P
G
.
9
8
7
)
20' SWM/BMP ACCESS EASEMENT
(D.B. 11881, PG. 710)
20' SWM/BMP ACCESS EASEMENT
(D.B. 11881, PG. 710)
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING BUILDING
16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT (D.B. 12220, PG. 735)
L8
L
9
L10
L
1
1
VAR. WIDTH DRAINAGE EASEMENT
696.27 sqft.
0.016 acres
N:3,670,554.99
E:11,722,714.12
N:3,670,685.21
E:11,722,700.33
N:3,670,554.68
E:11,722,711.12
N:3,670,684.41
E:11,722,692.75
LINE TABLE
LINE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
BEARING
S42°02'39"W
N23°23'24"W
N8°03'44"W
N8°03'44"W
N84°19'35"E
S5°57'27"E
S83°58'26"W
S83°58'26"W
N8°03'44"W
N83°58'26"E
S6°02'39"E
LENGTH
19.63'
7.76'
74.74'
101.05'
6.66'
100.94'
2.94'
3.01'
131.03'
7.62'
130.94'
YO
U
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
A
C
H
I
E
V
E
D
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
O
U
R
S
.
Si
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
10
0
1
B
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
,
S
u
i
t
e
3
0
0
|
R
i
c
h
m
o
n
d
,
V
A
2
3
2
2
5
TE
L
8
0
4
.
2
0
0
.
6
5
0
0
F
A
X
8
0
4
.
5
6
0
.
1
0
1
6
w
w
w
.
t
i
m
m
o
n
s
.
c
o
m
TH
I
S
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
A
T
T
H
E
CO
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
DATE:SCALE:
J.N.:SHEET OF
DRAWN BY:CHECK BY:
MATOACA DISTRICT Chesterfield County, VA
March 23, 2021
1 1
W.R. Herx
37480.028
1" = 20'
G. Delano
PLAT SHOWING
THE QUITCLAIM OF A PORTION
OF A 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
AND DEDICATION OF A
VARIABLE WIDTH DRAINAGE
EASEMENT LOCATED ON
GPIN:722670516900000
N
A
D
8
3
0
SCALE 1"=20'
40'20'
EXISTING EASEMENTS:
A Water Easements (D.B. 7991, PG. 101) - Exception #40
B Sewer & Water Easements (D.B. 7991, PG. 77) - Exception #36
C 16' Drainage Easement (D.B. 12220, PG. 735) - Exception #63
D Var. Width Bioretention SWM/BMP Easement (D.B. 11881, PG. 710)
E 20' SWM/BMP Access Easement (D.B. 11881, PG. 710)
Page 160 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.2.b.4.
Subject:
Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Variable Width SWM/BMP Easement Across the Property of Winterfield
Crossing Land LLC
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed
to vacate a portion of a variable width SWM/BMP easement across the property of Winterfield Crossing Land
LLC.
Summary of Information:
Winterfield Crossing Land LLC has requested the vacation of a portion of a variable width SWM/BMP
easement as shown on the attached plat. This request is for the development of Winterfield Crossing Tier V and
has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.Winterfield Crossing Land LLC Qitclaim Sketch
2.Winterfield Crossing Land LLC Quitclaim Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 161 of 399
MI DLO THI AN TP KE
W
I
N
T
E
R
F
I
E
L
D
R
D
WI N T E R V I E W P K W Y
W I N T E R B R E E Z E D R
WESTFIELD RD
L E G O R D O N D R
W I N T E R F I E L D P L
WINTERFIELD LN
MIDLOTHIAN WOOD BLVD
MICHAUX SPRINGS DR
O
L
D
O
T
T
E
R
D
A
L
E
R
D
M I C H A U X V I L L A G E D R
W
I
N
T
E
R
H
A
R
V
E
S
T
R
D
W
I
N
F
R
E
E
B
R
A
N
C
H
A
L
W I
N
T E
R
F I
E
L D
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
D R
JUSTICE RD
W
I
N
T
E
R
L
A
K
E
D
R
T A N A G E R W O O D T R L
W
I
N
T
E
R
L
A
K
E
C
T
MI D LO TH I A N T P K E
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a Variable Width SWM /BMP Easement Across the Property of Winterfield C rossing Land LLC
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
Portion of a SWM /BMP Easement to be Quitclaimed
Page 162 of 399
PLANNERS / ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
ROANOKE / RICHMOND / NEW RIVER VALLEY / STAUNTON / HARRISONBURG / LYNCHBURG
15871 City View Drive, Suite 200 / Midlothian, Virginia 23113 / Phone (804) 794-0571 / www.balzer.cc
03-25-2021
j:
\
1
9
\
5
0
\
5
6
\
5
6
1
9
0
0
3
5
.
0
5
w
i
n
t
e
r
f
i
e
l
d
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
t
i
e
r
5
\
s
u
r
v
e
y
\
d
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
\
5
6
1
9
0
0
3
5
-
0
5
e
s
m
t
-
q
c
b
m
p
.
d
w
g
DATE: 03-25-2021
SCALE: 1" = 40'
JOB: 56190035.05
DRAWN BY: WRL
CHECKED BY: CMF
SHEET 1 OF 1
CO. PLAN #21PR0161
CO. PROJ #20-0222
Page 163 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.2.b.5.
Subject:
Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 20’ Water Easement Across a Portion of 1600 Ashton Park Drive
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed
to vacate a portion of a 20’ water easement across a portion of 1600 Ashton Park Drive.
Summary of Information:
Carrie E. Coyner has requested the vacation of a portion of a 20’ water easement as shown on the attached
plat. This request is for the development of Warehouse Distribution Center at the Ashton Park Business Center
and has been reviewed by Utilities. New easements will be dedicated.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.Goodrich River Trust Agreement Water Easement Quitclaim Sketch
2.Goodrich River Trust Agreement Water Easement Quitclaim Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 164 of 399
R U F F I N M I L L R D
A S H T O N P A R K D R
PORT WALTHALL DR
R U F F I N M I L L P L
S A B R A W A Y
RUFFIN MILL CT
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 20’ Water Easement Across a Portion of 1600 Ashton Park Drive
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 700 feet
µ
James River
Portion of a 20' Water Easement to be Quitclaimed
Page 165 of 399
Page 166 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.3.
Subject:
Award a Construction Contract for Project IFB#ADMN21000177: Stratton Park Pedestrian Improvements and
Appropriation of Funds
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to authorize the Director of Procurement, upon concurrence from the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT), to award a construction contract to Dickerson Construction, LLC in the
amount of $1,006,342, appropriate $200,000 from the Community Connectivity Sidewalk Fund and execute all
necessary change orders, up to the full amount budgeted, for the Stratton Park Pedestrian Improvements
Project.
Summary of Information:
This project involves construction of approximately 1/2 mile of asphalt shared-use path connecting through
Stratton Park to Ronson Road, as well as 1/3 mile of concrete sidewalk along Ridgedale Parkway.
The county received a total of 3 bids ranging from $1,006,342 to $1,230,000. Staff has evaluated the bids and
recommends award of the contract to Dickerson Construction, LLC in the amount of $1,006,342.
Funds for the project are already secured and appropriated from the VDOT Transportation Alternatives
Program and the requested $200,000 appropriation is available in the County's Community Connectivity
Sidewalk Fund.
Attachments:
1.Stratton Park Peds - Award Exhibit Map
Preparer:Brent Epps, Director of Transportation
Approved By:
Page 167 of 399
R
T
E
1
5
0
R
T
E
1
5
0
C
h
i
p
p
e
n
h
a
m
P
K
W
Y
C
h
i
p
p
e
n
h
a
m
P
K
W
Y
R i d g e d a l e
R i d g e d a l eP K W Y
P K W Y
I
r
o
n
b
r
i
d
g
e
I
r
o
n
b
r
i
d
g
e
P
K
W
Y
P
K
W
Y
PROJECT
PROJECT
STRATTON PARK PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles¯
R
o
n
s
o
n
R
o
a
d
R
o
n
s
o
n
R
o
a
d
UkropPark
StrattonPark
SwimRVA
HenningES
S
p
o
k
e
S
p
o
k
e
C
o
u
r
t
C
o
u
r
t
LEGEND
STRATTON PARK PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Page 168 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.4.
Subject:
Appropriation of Funds and Authorization to Proceed with the Greenleigh Bus Turnaround and Pullout
Project
Board Action Requested:
The Board is requested to appropriate $500,000 from the General Road Improvement Account and authorize
staff to proceed with construction of the Greenleigh Bus Turnaround and Pullout.
Summary of Information:
In order to extend the bus service on Route 1 to the Greenleigh Mobile Home Park, a turnaround is needed for
the bus to circulate for travel northbound on Route 1. The plan and estimate for the bus turnaround and pullout
have been developed. The total project estimate (preliminary engineering, right-of-way and construction) is
$500,000. The project can be funded using funds from the General Road Improvement Account.
Construction is anticipated to begin in May 2021 and bus service would extend to Greenleigh beginning June
20, 2021.
Attachments:
1.Sketch
Preparer:Brent Epps, Director of Transportation
Approved By:
Page 169 of 399
BUS TURNAROUND & PULLOUT
CONCEPTUAL SKETCH
Page 170 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.5.
Subject:
Set Public Hearing Date to Consider the FY2022-FY2027 Secondary Road Six-Year Plan and FY2022
Secondary Road Budget
Board Action Requested:
Set May 26, 2021, as the date to hold a public hearing to consider: FY 2022–FY 2027 Secondary Road Six-
Year Plan and FY 2022 Secondary Road Budget.
Summary of Information:
FY 2022-FY 2027 Secondary Road Six-Year Plan
State statute requires the Board of Supervisors to update, every two years, jointly with the Virginia Department
of Transportation (VDOT), a six-year plan identifying improvements that are anticipated to be made to the
secondary road system in the county.
FY 2022 Secondary Road Budget
Annually, VDOT requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a Secondary Road Budget. The budget
reflects the first year of the Secondary Road Six-Year Plan and identifies specific project allocations for the
fiscal year.
Two weeks prior to the public hearing, the draft FY2022-FY2027 Secondary Road Six-Year Plan and FY2022
Secondary Road Budget will be posted on the county's
website: https://www.chesterfield.gov/574/Transportation.
Attachments:
None
Preparer:Brent Epps, Director of Transportation
Page 171 of 399
Approved By:
Page 172 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.6.
Subject:
Acceptance of State Roads
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of resolutions for the referenced state roads acceptances.
Summary of Information:
Clover Hill District:
Twilight Landing Section B
Matoaca District:
Bayhill Pointe Section 23
Bayhill Pointe Section 24
Cambria Cove Section 6
Midlothian District:
Hallsley Section 24
Attachments:
1.2021-04-28 Clover Hill - Twilight Landing Section B
2.2021-04-28 Matoaca - Bayhill Pointe Section 23
3.2021-04-28 Matoaca - Bayhill Pointe Section 24
4.2021-04-28 Matoaca - Cambria Cove Section 6
5.2021-04-28 Midlothian - Hallsey Section 24
Preparer:Scott Smedley, Director of Environmental Engineering
Approved By:
Page 173 of 399
Page 174 of 399
Page 175 of 399
Page 176 of 399
Page 177 of 399
Page 178 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.7.
Subject:
Accept and Appropriate
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Attachments:
None
Preparer:
Approved By:
Page 179 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.7.a.
Subject:
Accept and Appropriate Grant Funds From the Virginia Department of Aviation for Design of the Chesterfield
County Airport Airfield Drive Rehabilitation Project
Board Action Requested:
Approve acceptance and appropriation of grant funds from the Virginia Department of Aviation for design of
the Chesterfield County Airport Airfield Drive rehabilitation project.
Summary of Information:
The existing auto access road to the Chesterfield County Airport, Airfield Drive, consists of pavement that is
exhibiting various types of distress including alligator cracking and block cracking. The original pavement was
constructed more than 20 years ago, and although there has been maintenance on the roadway including an
overlay over 10 years ago, the pavement has deteriorated to the point where rehabilitation is required. The
proposed project includes design and specification development for the the rehabilitation of approximately
3,800 linear feet of Airfield Drive from the Whitepine Road entrance to the road end (adjacent to the main
terminal parking lot) utilizing mill and overlay of existing pavement where possible and reconstruction as
needed.
The estimated cost of this effort is $101,000. Grant funding from the Virginia Department of Aviation will fund
80% of the project ($80,800) with the balance coming from local major maintenance funds ($20,200). The
local funds are currently available and already appropriated through previous Board action.
Attachments:
1.Airfield Drive
Preparer:Clay Bowles, Director
Approved By:
Page 180 of 399
C
:
\
U
s
e
r
s
\
n
l
m
\
B
I
M
3
6
0
\
D
A
C
\
2
1
0
0
9
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
F
i
l
e
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
\
2
1
0
0
9
-
F
C
I
-
N
a
r
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
k
e
t
c
h
.
d
w
g
,
L
a
y
o
u
t
1
,
1
/
2
0
/
2
0
2
1
8
:
3
5
:
2
2
A
M
,
n
l
m
Page 181 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.7.b.
Subject:
Accept and Appropriate Grant Funds From the Virginia Department of Aviation for Demolition of the Old
Airport Fuel Farm and Construction of the New Fuel Farm Fuel Truck Parking Area
Board Action Requested:
Approve acceptance and appropriation of grant funds from the Virginia Department of Aviation for demolition
of the old Airport fuel farm and construction of the fuel truck parking area.
Summary of Information:
This project at the Chesterfield County Airport includes the demolition of the old fuel farm and construction of the fuel truck parking and access
road to serve the new fuel farm. New fuel tanks and spill containment was designed and constructed and is now operational. This
project completes the overall scope of work and is the only portion of the overall project eligible for state grant
funds.
This project was competitively procured and awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder in the
amount of $845,250. State funding is available on a 33%/67% DOAV/County formula, up to a maximum of
$200,000. Local funding for the amount above the state grant was appropriated by previous Board action.
Attachments:
1.Fuel Farm Demo-Truck Parking
Preparer:Clay Bowles, Director
Approved By:
Page 182 of 399
Page 183 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.7.c.
Subject:
Accept and Appropriate $65,500 in Additional Funding from the Department of Behavioral Health &
Developmental Services for a State Opioid Response (SOR) Grant
Board Action Requested:
Approve the receipt and appropriation of additional funding for the SOR grant year 3 which would allow for
the continuation of funding of prevention services to combat the opioid epidemic in Chesterfield County.
Summary of Information:
The Chesterfield Community Services Board (CSB) has been notified by the Virginia Department of
Behavioral Health & Developmental Services that it has been awarded $65,500 in additional prevention
funding to address the opioid crisis. The funding is a portion of an award provided to the Commonwealth from
the Federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) for dissemination to the
40 Community Services Boards (CSB). CSBs were awarded funding for prevention, treatment and/or recovery
based on the number of opioid overdoses and deaths, and funding must be expended by September 30, 2021.
The Chesterfield CSB will use this funding to continue to purchase and distribute medication disposal pouches
and locking medicine bags as well as implementing SAFE opioid and heroin prevention taskforce strategies
and train and implement the 5 Bridges Wellness System.
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the additional SOR grant funding as presented.
Attachments:
None
Preparer:Kelly Fried, Executive Director
Gerard Durkin, Acting Budget Director
Approved By:
Page 184 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.7.d.
Subject:
Accept and Appropriate $145,055 in Funding from the Department of Behavioral Health & Developmental
Services for Additional Funding from the State Opioid Response (SOR) Grant Year 3
Board Action Requested:
Approve the receipt and appropriation of additional funding for the SOR grant year 3 which would allow for
the implementation of a pilot program whereby the Virginia Association of Recovery Residences (VARR) will
partner with the CSB and Chesterfield County HARP jail program.
Summary of Information:
The Chesterfield Community Services Board (CSB) has been notified by the Virginia Department of
Behavioral Health & Developmental Services that it has been awarded $145,055 in funding to deliver an
evidence-based platform that measures positive and negative recovery capital and identifies barriers to recovery
within individuals. The funding is a portion of an award provided to the Commonwealth from the Federal
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) for dissemination to the 40
Community Services Boards (CSB). CSBs were awarded funding for prevention, treatment and/or recovery
based on the number of opioid overdoses and deaths, and funding must be expended by September 30, 2021.
The Chesterfield CSB will act as the fiscal agent in consideration for the services VARR will deliver including
the REC-CAP program in the jail. The outcome data will serve to inform programming recommendations
within the jail system to address gaps in services.
Attachments:
None
Preparer:Kelly Fried, Executive Director
Gerard Durkin, Acting Budget Director
Approved By:
Page 185 of 399
Page 186 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 13.B.7.e.
Subject:
Accept and Appropriate $72,127 in FY2022 Funding from the Department of Behavioral Health &
Developmental Services
Board Action Requested:
Approve the receipt of funding for the Community Services Board to support Step 6 of STEP (System
Transformation Excellence and Performance) VA - Service Members Veterans and Families.
Summary of Information:
The Chesterfield Community Services Board (CSB) has been notified by the Virginia Department of
Behavioral Health & Developmental Services that it has been awarded $72,127.23 in FY22 funding to support
clinical services enhancements related to Service Members Veterans and Families (SMVF) in Chesterfield
County.
The Chesterfield CSB will use this funding to train clinicians to specialize in treatment for Post Traumatic
Stress Disorder and other forms of trauma (including from military and/or combat service including Military
Sexual Trauma) and Substance Use Disorders so that clinical services align with Federal clinical guidelines
from Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense.
Attachments:
1.SMVF STEP VA Guidelines
Preparer:Kelly Fried, Executive Director
Gerard Durkin, Acting Budget Director
Approved By:
Page 187 of 399
Last Updated 4/8/2021 1 | P a g e
SERVICE MEMBERS VETERANS AND FAMILIES
FUNDING GUIDANCE DOCUMENT
Background and Purpose
As one of the nine required services for System Transformation Excellence and Performance (STEP-VA), the purpose of
the Service Members Veterans and Families (SMVF) step is to ensure SMVF receive needed mental health and
supportive services in the most efficient and effective manner available. Services shall be high quality, evidence-based,
trauma-informed, culturally-competent, and accessible.
Services Definition
The provision of community-based behavioral health care modeled after Federal clinical guidelines (from Veterans
Affairs and Department of Defense) and resource connections for Military Service Members (including Active Duty,
National Guard, and Armed Forces Reserves), Veterans, and their families (SMVF) seeking services.
Per the Code of Virginia, CSB core services (as of July 1, 2021) shall include mental health services for members of the
armed forces located 50 miles or more from a military treatment facility and veterans located 40 miles or more from a
Veterans Health Administration medical facility.
All CSBs will identify and refer SMVF seeking services to internal providers that have been trained in military cultural
competency (MCC). CSBs will also collaborate with Military Treatment Facilities (MTFs), Veterans Health Administration
(VHA) facilities, Virginia Department of Veterans Services (DVS) programs and other external providers to determine
SMVF eligibility for services. CSBs will also assist SMVF with services navigation as needed.
Guidelines
$3,840,490 was allocated to DBHDS (Grants to Localities) for FY 22 in support of SMVF STEP VA. This critical funding was
re-allotted during the 2020 Special Session. There are four major areas for use of funds, outlined below. The regional
office or as part of regional services with a CSB that will serve as the fiscal agent for the CSBs in that region will receive
equal allocations for items 1-3 (with a rate differential for Region 2 related to the Regional Navigator). Funds must be
compatible with the 2020-2021 DBHDS SMVF Needs Assessment submitted by each CSB/BHA and approved DBHDS. We
will allocate funding to only one regional office or fiscal agent in each region. Please communicate with DBHDS about
what office your regions’ preference for the regional office or fiscal agent for items 1-3. Funding for Clinical Services
Enhancement is based on a needs based formula and will be awarded to individual CSBs.
1. Regional Navigators.
Funding for 1 FTE position allocated to the regional office in each region or as part of regional services with a CSB that
will serve as the fiscal agent for the CSBs in that region for this item. Funding supports salary, fringe, and a materials,
supplies, and travel base. The purpose of the position is to provide dedicated capacity at the regional office/regional
level to support local, regional, and state level SMVF initiatives in service to the goals, service definition, and deliverables
of SMVF STEP VA. The Regional Navigator supports the connectedness of SMVF system needs across local, state, and
federal levels. The Regional Navigator should be a resource to community services boards in the region as they prepare
to meet the metrics (e.g. data consults, training connections) in conjunction with DBHDS Central Office, provide
technical assistance to CSBs in the region regarding SMVF, oversee regional SMVF training and capacity-building funds,
liaise with relevant partners at federal, state, and local levels, and participate in regional SMVF initiatives focused on
suicide prevention (e.g. Governor’s Suicide Prevention Challenge, crisis system development, peer and family support,
etc.). The Regional Navigator capacity should form cross referral and training partnerships with regional Department of
Veterans Services, Military Treatment Facilities, and Veterans Health Administration facilities. The Regional Navigator
Page 188 of 399
Last Updated 4/8/2021 2 | P a g e
will also serve on SMVF work groups to enhance regional services/partnerships (e.g. Governor’s Challenge teams, etc.)
and support and grow best practices within the region and individual CSBs in their region).
$109,000 per regional office or fiscal agent, except for Region 2 which is allotted at $124,600 due to a 15% rate
differential.
2. Lock and Talk.
Funding allocated to the regional office in each region, or as part of regional services with a CSB that will serve as the
fiscal agent for the CSBs in that region for this item. Funding for this item supports the goals of Lock and Talk and the
intersection with the SMVF population including but not limited to planning and capacity building, lethal means safety,
social media campaigns, and other activities. Funding can be applied at the regional level and/or disbursed to individual
CSBs by the regional office in support of regional goals.
$25,000 per regional office or fiscal agent.
3. Training and capacity building.
Funding allocated to the regional office in each region, or as part of regional services with a CSB that will serve as the
fiscal agent for the CSBs in that region for this item. Funding for this item supports regional training and capacity
building in service to service members, veterans and their families. Specifically: 1. Clinical training for CSB providers to
increase the availability of evidence-based, trauma-focused therapy such as prolonged exposure, cognitive processing
therapy, and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR); 2. Workforce training on military culture and
resources available to Service Members and their Families (SMVF); 3. Educational materials and outreach activities to
support clinical needs of SMVF.
$25,000 per regional office fiscal agent.
4. Clinical service enhancements.
Funding allocated for clinicians that specialize in treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and other forms of
trauma (including from military and/or combat service including Military Sexual Trauma) and Substance Use Disorders.
Clinical services should align with Federal clinical guidelines from Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense. These
highly-skilled clinicians will enhance clinical capacity for SMVF and all clients served by CSBs. Funding may also be
utilized to support these clinical roles (e.g. case managers or peer specialists to support clinical teams, administrative
positions, etc.) as long as the plan for these supportive positions support the implementation clinical services for SMVF.
Funding for clinical service enhancements will be allocated in a needs-based formula.
Clinical services enhancement comprises the remaining funding ($3,029,890). Funding is allotted based on a formula
along three dimensions: 1) current SMVF access to services, 2) need and prevalence, and 3) current capacity to serve
SMVF. The indicators that comprise each dimension of the formula are based on current research, guidance from the
Military and Veteran and STAC work groups, and requirements of the Code of Virginia.
1. Access
Indicator: Assesses each CSB clinic’s proximity to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Military
Treatment Facility (MTF) locations. The standard established within code is that no individual will be
greater than 40 miles from a VHA office and 50 miles from an MTF.
Scoring/Weight: If all CSB clinics are within both radiuses, there is no access multiplier added; if at least
one clinic is outside one of the radiuses, an access multiplier of 50% is applied to the CSB’s final score;
and if at least one clinic is outside both of the radiuses, an access multiplier of 100% is applied to the
CSB’s final score
Data Source: GIS coordinates
2. Need/Prevalence
Indicator 1: Most current veteran population in CSB catchment area
Scoring/Weight: Normalized to a Z-score to compare across CSBs. Value amounts to 50% of score.
Page 189 of 399
Last Updated 4/8/2021 3 | P a g e
Data Source: Veteran Population FY16 – National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics
Indicator 2: Number of veteran suicides
Scoring/Weight: Normalized to a Z-score to compare across CSBs. Value amounts to 25% of score.
Data Source: Virginia Department of Health, 2003-2017
3. Current Capacity
Indicator 1: Rate of SMVF served per 1,000 veterans in catchment area
Scoring/Weight: Normalized to a Z-score to compare across CSBs. Value amounts to 15% of score.
Data Source: National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics (for population) and CCS3 (for SMVF
served)
Indicator 2: Assessment of SMVF needs-based survey responses
Scoring/Weight: The STEP Military and Veteran work group reviewed responses to the needs-based
survey and assigned a current capacity score along a 3-point scale. Value amounts to 10% of score.
Data Source: CSB responses to SMVF needs-based survey
Final Clinical Services Enhancement Funding Formula:
[Vet Pop (.5) + Vet Suicides (.25) + SMVF Served (.15) + Current Capacity (.1) ] * Access Multiplier (x1, x1.5 or x2)
Metrics
As a reminder, during Phase 2 of implementation, it is required that all data are reported and CSBs engage with any
technical assistance or data quality improvement efforts offered. During Phase 3 of implementation, data are considered
reliable and valid and benchmarks are monitored. Phase 2 for SMVF begins July 1, 2021 and currently Phase 3 is planned
for July 1, 2022.
1. Conduct military cultural competency training for 100% of Direct Services CSB staff
a. Baseline measurement reported beginning July 1, 2021 (with end of year block grant EBP survey)
b. First assessment of compliance July 1, 2022
2. Track SMVF status for 90% of individuals presenting for services
a. Required to be reporting this element in CCS3 beginning July 1, 2021
b. First 12 months of data collection will be under “Phase 2” conditions where data quality is assessed
3. Track referral destination to military/veteran resources
a. Of those served by the CSB who are SMVF, at least 70% will be referred to Dept. of Veterans Services
(DVS), Veterans Health Administration facilities and services (VHA), and/or Military Treatment Facilities
and services (MTF) beginning July 1, 2021.
4. Conduct suicide risk screening using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale brief screen for 60% of Military
Service Members and Veterans
a. Beginning July 1, 2021 obtain baseline for Year 1 (For July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022)
b. Year 2 is 85% target (FY23)
Submission of Materials and Process
DBHDS’ goal is to ensure funds are distributed to the CSB and regional office or fiscal agent with the first warrant
payment (approximately 2nd week of July 2021). To facilitate the movement of funds we have planned the following:
1) Utilize needs survey results to finalize clinical service enhancement funding formula.
2) Determine funding allocations for each region (Regional Navigator; Lock and Talk; Training and Capacity
Building); determine the regional office or fiscal agent for each region
Page 190 of 399
Last Updated 4/8/2021 4 | P a g e
3) Determine funding allocation for each CSB (clinical services enhancements)
4) Accept and review budget, budget narratives, and timelines (regions and individual CSB)
5) Execute performance contract change and exhibits in accordance with DBHDS Office of Management Services by
July 1
6) Distribute funding starting with warrant payment 1
7) Begin baseline metric processing utilizing elements in CCS3
8) Begin monitoring, technical assistance, and evaluation
**DEADLINE** Each CSB related to clinical services enhancements:
Due 5pm, Monday, May 10, 2021. Submit a write-up containing your CSB’s budget, a budget narrative, and timeline for
implementation. Submit to Karen.dyer@dbhds.virginia.gov
**DEADLINE** Each regional office or CSB serving as fiscal agent and manager for the regional components:
Due 5pm, Monday, May 10, 2021. Submit a budget, budget narrative and timeline for implementing your regions’ STEP
VA SMVF plan. Submit to Karen.dyer@dbhds.virginia.gov
Questions? Mira.signer@dbhds.virginia.gov
Page 191 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 1 of 14
20SN0609 – Dudley C Duncan
Magisterial District – Matoaca
Agent – Dudley Duncan (804-640-5714)
BOS Public Hearing – April 28, 2021
Time Remaining
365 Days
Case Manager
Harold Ellis
(804-768-7592)
Request
Rezoning &
Conditional Use Planned Development
Rezoning from Residential (R-12) to Community Business
(C-3) plus conditional use planned development (CUPD) for
ordinance exceptions and modification to permit the
expansion of an existing swim facility.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval
Staff Recommendation
Approval
The Property
6800 Deer Run Drive
Site Size
3.1 Acres
Comprehensive Plan –
Land Use Designation
Suburban Residential II
Plan Area
County Wide Plan
Figure 1: Aerial of Request Area – Click Image for Link to GIS
Figure 2: Area Map of Request & Land Use Plan Map
The applicant is requesting this rezoning plus CUPD for ordinance exceptions and modification to permit the expansion
of an existing swim facility. The facility will be a commercial indoor recreation/training facility open to the general
public. Ordinance exceptions include 1) reduction in the required number of parking spaces, 2) a buffer reduction, and
3) reduction to the interior side yard setback for parking.
Summary of Proposal
Page 192 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 2 of 14
PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVAL
STAFF - APPROVAL
Staff recommends approval with proffered conditions. No adverse impacts are anticipated.
NOTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. Conditions may be imposed, or the property owner may proffer conditions.
2. Proffered conditions, Textual Statement, and a conceptual plan are in this report.
Recommendations
Page 193 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 3 of 14
Summary of Proposal .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Planning................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Current Zoning Map ................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Supplemental Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 6
Community Enhancement .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Environmental Engineering ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................... 6
Parks & Recreation .............................................................................................................................................................. 7
Schools ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Transportation - County Department of Transportation .................................................................................................... 7
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation ................................................................................................... 7
Utilities – Water and Wastewater ...................................................................................................................................... 8
Community Engagement & Public Hearings ........................................................................................................................... 8
Proffered Conditions (3/15/2021) .......................................................................................................................................... 9
Textual Statement - Ordinance Exceptions (3/15/2021) ...................................................................................................... 10
Proposed Layout Plan – Exhibit A ......................................................................................................................................... 11
Case Contacts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12
Appendix ............................................................................................................................................................................... 13
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................. 13
Table of Contents
Page 194 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 4 of 14
Zoning History
85SN0035: Approved (6/1985)
Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (O), Convenience Business (B-1), Light Industrial (M-1), and Residential
(R-12) permitting a planned community containing single family homes, plus office, commercial, and industrial uses.
Conditions of approval addressed:
1. Textual Statement to be considered the Plan of Development
2. Right-of-way dedication
3. Future traffic study requirements and access limitations
4. Land use design and buffering requirements
5. Recreational facility requirements to be reviewed at a later date by the Planning Commission
6. Drainage and erosion sediment control requirements
7. Home size and design requirements (and a requirement for restrictive covenants)
Comprehensive Plan – Land Use Plan Designation
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for Suburban Residential II, which suggests the Property is appropriate
for residential development at a maximum density of 2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre.
Proposal
The applicant is requesting rezoning from Residential (R-12) to Community Business (C-3) plus CUPD for ordinance
exceptions and development standards to permit the expansion of an existing swim facility. The existing facility is a
commercial indoor recreation/training facility open to the public, which consists of a swimming pool and clubhouse. The
applicant would like to expand the facility by constructing an additional indoor swimming pool, reception area and
changing rooms to provide for "learn to swim" classes. This swimming pool is designed specifically for teaching
purposes, meaning, the pool will be smaller than standard pools which would be used for competition. The pool will be
shallower, will contain warmer water and will be equipped with under water video capability. Approval of a Conditional
Use Planned Development is also requested to permit exceptions and one development standard modification to
ordinance requirements as detailed below.
Ordinance Exceptions
The applicant is requesting the following ordinance exceptions and exception to development standards:
• Number of parking spaces
o The ordinance requires one (1) space per 200 square feet of gross floor area, resulting in eighty-one (81)
required parking spaces for this use
o The applicant is proposing 1 space per 260 square feet of gross floor area, resulting in 65 spaces
• Buffer along the southern property line
o The ordinance requires a seventy-five (75) foot buffer along the south property line
o The applicant is proposing a twenty (20) foot buffer along the south property line
• Interior side yard parking setback
o The ordinance requires a thirty (30) foot interior side yard parking setback adjacent to residential zoning
(in this case, along the south property line)
o The applicant is proposing a twenty (20) foot setback
Planning
Page 195 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 5 of 14
Current Zoning Map
Page 196 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 6 of 14
No comment on this request.
1. Entire property is located within the Lower Swift Creek Watershed.
2. Any areas of wetlands shall not be impacted without prior approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and/or the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality.
3. Portions of the property currently drain into an existing storm sewer system in the Deer Run subdivision.
Increased runoff from the proposed development may result in increased flooding within the existing
neighborhood; therefore, the post-development 100-year peak discharge rate from the site must not exceed the
pre-development 100-year peak discharge rate.
a. The applicant has offered Proffered Condition 3.a to address this concern.
4. To protect downstream properties from flooding in the event of a dam failure, any detention facility serving the
development shall be a dry facility constructed below the existing ground, such that no manmade compacted
embankment is required.
a. The applicant has offered Proffered Condition 3.b to address this concern.
5. Development is subject to the Part IIB technical criteria of the Virginia Stormwater Management Program
Regulations for water quality and water quantity.
Service Area
The Clover Hill Fire Station, Company Number 7
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment*
Insurance Service Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) Class 2
Anticipated Impacts On Fire & EMS
Call Load in Immediate Service Area During Previous Fiscal Year 3178
Projected Calls Generated Yearly by Proposed Development N/A
(commercial)
Projected Call Load Increase in Immediate Service Area by Proposed Development N/A
Drive And Response Times
Response Zone/Response Time Goal* Urban / 7
Minutes
Road Miles from Closest Fire Station .32 miles
Estimated Drive Time from Closest Fire Station1 32 seconds
Estimated Response Time for First Unit on Scene2 3:32 minutes
Planned Capital Facility Improvements
Additional Information
When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire
protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process.
Supplemental Analysis
Community Enhancement
Environmental Engineering
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Page 197 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 7 of 14
*Additional information relative to Fire & Life Safety’s Mission and Service Profile, Community Fire
Protection Capabilities Assessment, and Response Time Goals can be found in the Appendix.
1 Drive-time estimates are exclusive of potential delays due to weather, traffic, or blockage of response routes.
2 Estimates assume response units and personnel are in the station and available to respond at the time of an incident and include 1 min
30 sec for 911 call processing and dispatch, and up to 1 min 30 sec for firefighter turnout.
No comments provided for this case.
No comments provided for this case.
The Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Thoroughfare Plan, identifies county-wide transportation needs that are
expected to mitigate traffic impacts of future growth. With the use restrictions to recreational establishment, commercial-
indoor use, the anticipated traffic impact of the proposal has been evaluated and it is anticipated to be minimal.
The applicant is requesting to rezone the property from R-12 to C-3 with a Conditional Use Planning Development
(CUPD) to restrict use to a recreational establishment commercial-indoor use. The property currently serves as an
instructional swimming facility, which will remain the primary use of the property. During the site plan review process,
VDOT will require the applicant to submit traffic projections and turn lane warrants for the on-site improvements.
Additional comments will be generated during the site plan review process.
Parks & Recreation
Schools
Transportation - County Department of Transportation
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation
Page 198 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 8 of 14
1. The existing swimming training facility is connected to the public water and wastewater systems.
2. The proposed expansion will have minimal impact on the public water and wastewater systems.
3. The Utilities Department supports this request.
Community Meetings
2/03/2021 – A virtual Community Meeting was hosted by the applicant. No citizens attended the meeting.
Planning Commission
3/16/2021: Citizen Comments: No citizens spoke to the request.
Recommendation: APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Motion: Owens Second: Sloan
AYES: Freye, Owens, Hylton, Petroski and Sloan
Utilities – Water and Wastewater
Community Engagement & Public Hearings
Page 199 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 9 of 14
Staff Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend acceptance of the following proffered conditions
offered by the applicant:
1. Master Plan. The Master Plan for the Property shall consist of the following (P):
a. The development of the property shall generally conform to the Preliminary Layout Plan, last revised
March 10, 2021, prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc. Minor adjustments to the Conceptual Plan may
be approved at the time of site plan review, provided such adjustments substantially retain the
relationship between the building, parking spaces, and existing structures. If adjustments are deemed to
be significant, the Conceptual Plan shall be presented to the Planning Commission for final approval.
b. The Textual Statement, last revised March 10, 2021.
2. Uses. The property shall be limited to Recreational establishment, commercial-indoor use. All other Community
Business (C-3) District uses shall be prohibited (P).
3. Environmental Engineering (EE).
a. The post-development 100-year peak discharge rate from the site cannot exceed the pre-development
100-year peak discharge rate.
b. Any retention or detention facility serving the site shall be a dry facility below the existing ground with
no manmade compacted embankment required, or if a manmade embankment is necessary and
planned, a dam failure analysis may be required, as determined by the Department of Environmental
Engineering at the time of plan review, showing no homes will be detrimentally impacted. The dam
embankment design shall include, but not limited to, a clay core or a syphon structure.
Proffered Conditions (3/15/2021)
Page 200 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 10 of 14
This is a request to rezone the Property to Community Business (C-3) District with a Conditional Use Planning
Development (CUPD) to permit ordinance exceptions, as described herein, and as provided in the accompanying
proffered conditions. Uses shall conform to the regulations set forth in the Community Business (C-3) District except as
outlined below.
1. Parking Spaces. On-site parking shall be provided at a minimum of 1 space per 260 square feet of gross floor
area.
2. Buffer. A twenty (20) foot buffer, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, shall be provided along the southern
property line adjacent to the Deer Run subdivision.
3. Interior Yard Parking Setback. The interior yard setback for parking shall be twenty (20) feet along the southern
property line.
Textual Statement - Ordinance Exceptions (3/15/2021)
Page 201 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 11 of 14
Proposed Layout Plan – Exhibit A
Page 202 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 12 of 14
Applicant
• Applicant’s Contact:
Dudley Duncan (804-640-5714)
dudleyduncan01@gmail.com
District Planning Commissioner
• Tommy Owens (804-869-2214)
owenstommy@chesterfield.gov
Staff
• Planning Department Case Manager: Harold Ellis (804-768-7592) ellish@chesterfield.gov
• Budget & Management: Karen Bailey (804-751-4327) baileykl@chesterfield.gov
• Community Enhancement: Carl Schlaudt (804-318-8674) schlaudtc@chesterfield.gov
• Environmental Engineering: Rebeccah Rochet (804-748-1028) rochetr@chesterfield.gov
• Fire & Emergency Medical Services: Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
• Libraries: Jennifer Stevens (804-751-4998) stevensj@chesterfield.gov
• Parks & Recreation: Janit Llewellyn (804-751-4482) llewellynJa@chesterfield.gov
• Police: Steve Grohowski (804-751-4720) growhowskis@chesterfield.gov
• Schools: Atonja Allen (804-318-8740) atonja_allen@ccps.net
• Transportation - County Department of Transportation: Steve Adams (804-751-4461)
adamsst@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation: Willie Gordon (804-674-2907)
willie.gordon@vdot.virginia.gov
• Utilities: Randy Phelps (804-796-7126) phelpsc@chesterfield.gov
Case Contacts
Page 203 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 13 of 14
Mission & Service Profile
The mission of Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services (CFEMS) is to protect life, property, and the environment.
This requires a comprehensive portfolio of services aimed at preventing fires, mitigating the impact of fires and disasters
on the community, and providing a timely and effective response when fires, medical and other emergencies occur.
Community risks, population growth and demographic changes, service demands, and response times are reviewed
annually and the need for additional Fire & EMS operating and capital resources in support of the department’s mission
is evaluated during the county’s annual budget and 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) processes.
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment
Chesterfield Fire and EMS participates in the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) program,
which rates a community’s fire protection capabilities in accordance with the Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS).
Using the FSRS, the ISO performs a comprehensive evaluation of a community’s fire department, water supply, emergency
communications and community risk reduction efforts. The resulting score establishes a PPC rating from 1 to 10, with
Class 1 being the best possible rating. Many insurance carriers reference a community’s PPC rating in establishing
insurance premiums. Generally, communities with a Class 1 rating enjoy lower insurance premiums than those
communities with a Class 10 rating. Chesterfield County has a current community classification of 2/2Y; however, some
portions are classified as 10 or 10W based on the parameters indicated below.
Class 2 - within 5 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 2Y – within 5 miles of a fire station but not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10W – within 5-7 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10 – outside of 5 miles of a fire station and not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Appendix
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Page 204 of 399
Dudley C Duncan 20SN0609 Page 14 of 14
Response Time Goals (Urban/Rural Zones)
Urban Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 7 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to
arrival of first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 4 minutes or less
travel time for the first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 8 minutes or less travel time for
deployment of an Effective Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Rural Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 12 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to arrival of
first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 9 minutes or less travel time for the
first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 13 minutes or less travel time for deployment of an Effective
Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Page 205 of 399
Rezoning from Residential (R-12) District to Community
Business (C-3) District and a Conditional Use Planned
Development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements.
Dudley C. Duncan
20SN0609 – Matoaca
This case is in the Matoaca District, and the applicant, Dudley Duncan, is requesting
rezoning from Residential (R-12) District to Community Business (C-3) District and a
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit exceptions to ordinance
requirements.
1Page 206 of 399
20SN0609 – Overview
1. Rezoning from R-12 to C-3
with CUPD for ordinance
exceptions to expand
existing swim facility
2. CUPD pertains to parking,
existing buffer, and existing
setback
3. Commission and Staff
recommend approval with
proffered conditions
The property is located on the west side of Deer Run Drive, south of Hull Street. The
applicant is requesting rezoning from Residential (R-12) District to Community
Business (C-3) District and a Conditional Use Planned Development to permit
exceptions to ordinance requirements relative to parking, setbacks, and buffer
reduction, in order to expand an existing swim facility. The proposal is to add an
additional swimming pool, reception area, and changing room, in order to provide
additional swim classes. Staff has not identified any adverse impacts as a result of
the proposal and no citizen comments have been received to date regarding the
request. The Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval with the proffered
conditions.
2Page 207 of 399
20SN0609 – Zoning Map
The property is located on the west side of Deer Run Drive, south of Hull Street, and
consists of 3.1 acres. The site is zoned R-12, as are properties to the south and east;
properties to the north and west are zoned Industrial and Commercial.
3Page 208 of 399
20SN0609 – Aerial & Land Use Plan Map
This is an arial of the site and excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan. As you can see,
the site is currently developed and properties to the north and west are developed as
commercial/industrial, and to the south and east as single-family residential. The
land use plan designation for the site is Suburban Residential II.
4Page 209 of 399
20SN0609 – Conceptual Layout Plan (Amended)
The proposal is to add an additional swimming pool, reception area, and changing
room, in order to provide additional swim classes. A Conditional Use Planned
Development is requested to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements relative to
parking, setbacks, and buffer reduction. Specifically, the applicant is proposing to
reduce the required parking ratio, and southern property line setback and buffer,
based on existing site conditions.
5Page 210 of 399
20SN0609 – Recommendation(s)
Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval.
The Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval with the proffered
conditions. No known adverse impacts as a result of the proposal have been
identified.
6Page 211 of 399
20SN0609 – Zoning Map
7Page 212 of 399
Page 213 of 399
Page 214 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 1 of 18
21SN0551 – Verdad Real Estate &
Construction Services
Magisterial District – Matoaca
Agent – Danielle Danzing (757-217-2097)
BOS Public Hearing – April 28, 2021
Time Remaining
365 Days
Case Manager
Ryan Ramsey
(804-751-4474)
Request
Rezoning, Conditional Use Planned Development &
Utility Waiver
A convenience store with gasoline sales, served by a
private septic system, is proposed.
Planning Commission Recommendations
Approval – Request I (Rezoning & CUPD)
Approval – Request II (Utility Waiver)
Staff Recommendations
Approval – Request I (Rezoning & CUPD)
Denial – Request II (Utility Waiver)
The Property
17221 Hull Street Road
Site Size
1.7 Acres
Comprehensive Plan –
Land Use Designation
Corporate Office/Research &
Development/Light Industrial
Plan Area
County Wide Plan
Figure 1: Aerial of Request Area – Click Image for Link to GIS
Figure 2: Area Map of Request & Land Use Plan Map
REQUEST I. Rezoning from General Business (C-5) to Neighborhood Business (C-2) with conditional use planned
development (CUPD) for ordinance and development standard exceptions relative to the parking setback along
Baldwin Creek Road.
REQUEST II. Exception to Section 18-60 of the utility ordinance for connection to the public wastewater system.
Development of the Property for a convenience store with gasoline sales is planned. As proposed, the project would be
serviced by a private septic system. The Property is located within a mandatory wastewater connection area,
necessitating an exception to connect to the public wastewater use.
Summary of Proposal
Page 215 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 2 of 18
PLANNING COMMISSION- APPROVAL – REQUESTS I & II
STAFF – APPROVAL – REQUEST I
Rezoning the Property from General Business (C-5) to Neighborhood Business (C-2) will limit the scope of
permitted commercial uses on the Property, bringing it into closer alignment with those uses designated by
Land Use Plan. Proffered conditions will ensure a quality architectural design for the proposed development.
The reduction in the parking setback to forty (40) feet along Baldwin Creek Road will be minimized with
perimeter landscaping as typically required in a fifty (50) foot setback.
DENIAL – REQUEST II
No topographic or sewer capacity limitations exist that would prevent connection to public wastewater system.
Relief of public utility connection will likely result in other properties seeking similar exceptions. The request
may adversely impact the extension of public wastewater system to area properties.
NOTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. Conditions may be imposed, or the property owner may proffer conditions.
2. Proffered conditions, Textual Statement, a conceptual plan, and conceptual elevations have been submitted by the
applicant.
UTILITIES – REQUEST II
• No topographic or sewer capacity limitations exist that would prevent connection to public wastewater
system
• Failure to extend public wastewater system to the subject property will adversely affect:
o Achieving the highest and best land uses suggested by the Comprehensive Plan
o Public utility service to area properties that currently use private septic systems
• Relief of public wastewater connection could result in other properties seeking similar exceptions
Recommendations
Summary of Identified Topics
Page 216 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 3 of 18
Summary of Proposal .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
Summary of Identified Topics ................................................................................................................................................. 2
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Planning................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Current Zoning Map ................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Supplemental Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 6
Community Enhancement .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Environmental Engineering ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................... 6
Transportation - County Department of Transportation .................................................................................................... 7
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation ................................................................................................... 7
Utilities – Water and Wastewater ...................................................................................................................................... 8
Community Engagement & Public Hearings ........................................................................................................................... 9
Proffered Conditions (2/3/2021) .......................................................................................................................................... 10
Textual Statement - Ordinance Exceptions (1/8/2021) ........................................................................................................ 12
Concept Plan – Exhibit A ....................................................................................................................................................... 13
Elevations – Exhibit B ............................................................................................................................................................ 14
Case Contacts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 16
Appendix ............................................................................................................................................................................... 17
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................. 17
Table of Contents
Page 217 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 4 of 18
Comprehensive Plan – Land Use Plan Designation
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for Corporate Office/Research & Development/Light Industrial, which
suggests the Property is appropriate for corporate office, research, laboratories, and light manufacturing and assembly
uses that are generally dependent upon raw materials first processed elsewhere.
Proposal
The applicant proposes to develop the Property for a convenience store with gas fueling stations, drives and parking
areas (Concept Plan – Exhibit A).
The first portion of Request I is a proposal to rezone the Property from General Business (C-5) to Neighborhood Business
(C-2). This rezoning action would further limit permitted commercial uses on the Property. The Plan designates the
Property for Corporate Office/Research & Development/Light Industrial (CORDLI) uses, which does not support the
proposed use or zoning district classification. However, the Property’s small size and being adjacent to another
retail/commercial use supports flexibility to consider limited commercial uses. Staff finds that there is likely not enough
developable space for a project in this immediate area to be developed for CORDLI uses. Therefore, the proposal to
rezone to Neighborhood Business (C-2) will limit the scope of permitted commercial uses and be consistent with area
development.
Architecture
The applicant has proffered a condition that aims to establish a level of quality architecture and design standards for the
project. Proffered Condition 2 establishes the architecture of the building and gas canopy per the elevation drawings in
Exhibit B. The elevations depict a building that will be consistent with the style and building materials of other buildings
within adjoining blocks. Review and approval of the final elevation drawings will occur in conjunction with site plan
review. This proffered condition will ensure high quality architectural standards for the proposed building and gas
canopy structure.
Ordinance Exception
The Property is in the Route 360 West Design District, which provides development standards for non-residential uses.
The second portion of Request I contains an exception for a reduced parking setback from Baldwin Creek Road, generally
shown in the proffered Concept Plan and outlined in the Textual Statement:
• Required major arterial yard setback (Baldwin Creek Road) for parking is either seventy-five (75) feet with
Landscaping B or fifty (50) feet with Landscaping C; a forty (40) foot setback from the existing right-of-way line is
proposed.
o Perimeter Landscaping C will still be installed within this setback area.
Staff finds that the exception will not have an adverse impact on area properties with the requirement to install
Perimeter Landscaping C within the reduced setback area.
Planning
Page 218 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 5 of 18
Current Zoning Map
Page 219 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 6 of 18
No comment on this request.
1. Entire property is located within the Upper Swift Creek Watershed.
2. Natural Resource Inventory for the property was completed and approved by the Department of Environmental
Engineering.
a. There are no environmentally sensitive areas (Resource Protection Area/wetlands) or cultural resources
within the limits of the property.
b. Soils over much of the property are slightly erodible.
c. Large stockpile of fill dating from the 1990s is present onsite.
3. Portions of the subject property currently drain southeast to an existing privately owned pond. Increased runoff
from the proposed development may impact the structural integrity of the existing pond; therefore, the post-
development 100-year peak discharge rate shall be less than the pre-development 100-year peak discharge rate.
a. The applicant has offered proffered condition 11 to address this concern.
4. To address water quality concerns in the watershed, enhanced erosion and sediment control measures above
those required by state regulations shall be provided, which include the use of super silt fence or an approved
alternative; sediment traps and basins at least 25% larger than the minimum state standard; and the application
of Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium, or an approved equivalent to denuded areas during construction and
final stabilization.
a. The applicant has offered proffered conditions 12.a, 12.b, and 12.c to address this concern.
5. Development is subject to the Part IIB technical criteria of the Virginia Stormwater Management Program
Regulations for water quality and water quantity.
Service Area
The Magnolia Green Fire Station, Company Number 25
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment*
Insurance Service Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) Class 2
Anticipated Impacts On Fire & EMS
Call Load in Immediate Service Area During Previous Fiscal Year 912
(projected)
Projected Calls Generated Yearly by Proposed Development N/A
(commercial)
Projected Call Load Increase in Immediate Service Area by Proposed Development N/A
Drive And Response Times
Response Zone/Response Time Goal* Urban / 7
Minutes
Road Miles from Closest Fire Station 1.8 miles
Estimated Drive Time from Closest Fire Station1 2:26 minutes
Estimated Response Time for First Unit on Scene2 5:26 minutes
Planned Capital Facility Improvements
Supplemental Analysis
Community Enhancement
Environmental Engineering
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Page 220 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 7 of 18
Additional Information
When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire
protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process.
*Additional information relative to Fire & Life Safety’s Mission and Service Profile, Community Fire
Protection Capabilities Assessment, and Response Time Goals can be found in the Appendix.
1 Drive-time estimates are exclusive of potential delays due to weather, traffic, or blockage of response routes.
2 Estimates assume response units and personnel are in the station and available to respond at the time of an incident and include 1 min
30 sec for 911 call processing and dispatch, and up to 1 min 30 sec for firefighter turnout.
Based on the applicant’s rezoning request and the Concept Plan (Proffered Condition 3) and applying trip generation rates
for a super convenience market/gas station, development could generate approximately 2,800 average daily trips. The
Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Thoroughfare Plan, identifies county-wide transportation needs that are
expected to mitigate traffic impacts of future growth. The anticipated traffic impact of the proposal has been evaluated
and recommendations are detailed in the chart below:
Recommendation Applicant’s Proposal
Right-of-Way Dedication (measured from the centerline of roadway):
a. 100 feet along the south side of Route 360
b. 45 feet along the east side of Baldwin Creek Road
Offered as Recommended
Proffered Condition 4
Vehicular Access:
Limited to one (1) access to Baldwin Creek Road. (Note: Access may be limited to right-
in/right-out with future widening/improvements to Route 360 or Baldwin Creek Road.)
Offered as Recommended
Proffered Condition 5
Road Improvements (Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy):
a. Separate right turn lane at the existing and off-site Route 360 access.
b. Sidewalk along Route 360 frontage to existing Route 360 access.
c. Separate right turn lane at the Baldwin Creek Road access.
d. Pedestrian accommodations at the Route 360/Baldwin Creek intersection.
e. Traffic signal modifications at the Route 360/Baldwin Creek intersection.
f. Dedication of additional right-of-way/easements to accommodate improvements.
Offered as Recommended
Proffered Condition 6
Advisory Comment(s):
In accordance with the Bikeways and Trails Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, the
owner/developer will be required to provide a VDOT standard shared use path along the
Baldwin Creek Road frontage as enforced by the Planning Department.
Shown on Concept Plan
Transportation staff supports the rezoning request (Request I) and has no comment on the utility exception (Request II)
as this has no impact on the transportation network.
The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to C-2 with a Conditional Use Planned Development (CUPD) for a
proposed commercial site. Access to the site is shown on the conceptual plan to be through the use of two existing
commercial entrances to the adjacent property. All proposed sidewalks and bicycle facilities proposed in VDOT right-of-
way shall be designed in accordance with VDOT standards. Any road improvements to Hull Street Road (US 360) and
Baldwin Creek Road (Route 730) shall be in accordance with the Department design standards and specifications. Any
proposed modifications to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Hull Street Road and Baldwin Creek Road shall
be provided to the Department for review and approval prior to any signal modifications. During the site plan review
process, VDOT will require trip generations based on the new impacts to traffic, with turn lane warrants analysis and
sight distance requirements. Additional comments will be generated during the site plan process.
Transportation - County Department of Transportation
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation
Page 221 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 8 of 18
1. The request site is within a mandatory connection area for public water and wastewater for new non-residential
development.
2. Public water is available.
3. Public wastewater is not available. The closest line that could be extended to provide service by gravity is
located approximately 2,260 feet east of the request site.
a. A conservative estimated cost for this extension is approximately $393,000.00.
b. There are no physical conflicts or system capacity limitations that would make this extension unfeasible.
c. The applicant is requesting an exception to the mandatory wastewater connection requirement.
4. To address the Utilities Departments concerns with this request, and in keeping with other similar wastewater
connection exception requests, the applicant has submitted proffers which:
a. Requires connection to the public water system with site development.
b. Provides for the dedication of public wastewater easements to facilitate future service to adjacent
properties.
c. Requires extension to property and connection of all uses requiring domestic wastewater if the public
wastewater system is extended to within 200 feet of the property.
d. Ties the exception to the 1.72 acre request site provided use is limited to a 7-Eleven type facility.
5. The Board of Supervisors approved a wastewater connection exception request with case 18SN0736 for a mini-
warehouse facility located east of the request site at 17101 Hull Street Road. Conditions similar to those
recommended for this request were imposed with that approval.
6. Based on County Code requirements, the Utilities Department does not support this request.
Utilities – Water and Wastewater
Page 222 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 9 of 18
Community Meetings
2/11/2021 – Discussion Topics:
1. A virtual community meeting was conducted.
2. No questions or concerns were expressed from the participants.
Planning Commission
3/16/2021: Citizen Comments: No citizens spoke to this request.
Recommendation: APPROVAL OF REQUESTS I & II WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Motion: Owens Second: Sloan
AYES: Freye, Owens, Hylton, Petroski, Sloan
Community Engagement & Public Hearings
Page 223 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 10 of 18
Staff Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend acceptance of Proffered Conditions 1-7, 11 and 12 as
offered by the applicant. Only the Planning Commission recommends acceptance of Proffered Conditions 8-10 as
offered by the applicant.
1. Textual Statement. The Textual Statement, dated January 8, 2021, shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
2. Elevations. The building, gas canopy, and dumpster enclosure shall have an architectural design generally as
shown on the attached elevations prepared by Intrepide design dated March 4, 2020. Review and approval of
the elevations shall be in conjunction with any site plan review. (P)
3. Concept Plan. The site layout shall have a design generally as shown on the attached concept site plan prepared
by Kimley-Horn and Associates dated December 2020. (P)
4. Dedication. Prior to any site plan approval or within sixty (60) days from a written request by the Chesterfield
Department of Transportation, whichever occurs first, the following rights-of-way shall be dedicated, free and
unrestricted, to and for the benefit of Chesterfield County, measured from the centerline of that part of
specified roadway immediately adjacent to the Property:
a. One hundred (100) feet of right-of-way along the south side of Hull Street Road (Route 360); and,
b. Forty-five (45) feet of right-of-way along the east side of Baldwin Creek Road. (T)
5. Access. Direct vehicular access from the Property to Baldwin Creek Road shall be limited to one (1)
entrance/exit. The exact location of the accesses shall be approved by the Transportation Department. (Note:
The Baldwin Creek Road access may be limited to a right-in/right-out with future widening/improvements along
Route 360 or Baldwin Creek Road.) (T)
6. Road Improvements. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, the following road improvements, with
the exact design and length of the improvements approved by the Transportation Department, shall be
completed.
a. Construction of additional pavement along the eastbound lanes of Route 360 at the existing off-site
Route 360 access to provide a separate right turn lane.
b. Construction of a VDOT standard sidewalk along the development’s frontage to Route 360 to the
existing Route 360 access.
c. Construction of additional pavement along the northbound lanes of Baldwin Creek Road at the
approved access to provide a separate right turn lane.
d. Construction of crosswalk and pedestrian accommodations at the Route 360/Baldwin Creek Road
intersection.
e. Full cost of traffic signal modifications at the Route 360/Baldwin Creek Road intersection, if warranted to
accommodate road and pedestrian improvements identified above, as determined by the
Transportation Department.
f. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, any additional right-of-way (or easements)
required for the improvements identified above. In the event the owner/developer is unable to acquire
the “off-site” right-of-way that is necessary for the construction of a separate right turn lane at the
approved access to Baldwin Creek Road (Proffered Condition 3.C.), the owner/developer may request, in
writing, that Chesterfield County acquire such right-of-way as a public road improvement. All costs
associated with the acquisition of the right-of-way shall be borne by the owner/developer. In the event
Chesterfield County chooses not to assist the owner/developer in acquisition of the “off-site” right-of-
way, the owner/developer shall be relieved of the obligation to acquire the “off-site” right-of-way and
Proffered Conditions (3/12/2021)
Page 224 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 11 of 18
shall provide the road improvements to the extent they can be constructed within available right-of-
way, as determined by the Transportation Department. (T)
7. Public Water Connection. Public water shall be used. (U)
8. Public Wastewater Easements. Any site plan or building permit for the subject parcel shall provide and dedicate
public wastewater easements in locations acceptable to the Utilities Department to accommodate the future
extension of the public wastewater system. Such easements shall be dedicated prior to the site plan approval.
(U)
9. Future Connection to Public Wastewater System. In the event the public wastewater system is extended to a
point within 200 feet of the property, the public wastewater system shall be extended to a point acceptable to
the Utilities Department and all uses requiring domestic wastewater shall be connected to the public
wastewater system. (U)
10. Wastewater Exception Limitations. The exception to the use of public wastewater shall only apply to the 1.72
acre parcel provided the use is limited to a 7-Eleven type facility as proposed. Any development of the property
for additional lots or uses, other than the aforementioned, shall be required to conform to the Code at that time
for the provision of public wastewater. (U)
11. Stormwater. For any portions of the property that will drain towards the southeast, the post-development 100-
year peak discharge rate will not exceed the pre-development 100-year peak discharge rate. (EE)
12. Environmental Standards. The following environmental standards shall be provided. The Department of
Environmental Engineering shall approve the exact design and implementation of these standards.
a. Super Silt Fence, or an alternative as approved by the Department of Environmental Engineering, shall
be provided as a perimeter control.
b. Sediment traps and basins sized at least 25% larger than the minimum Virginia Erosion and Sediment
Control Handbook’s standard shall be provided.
c. Anionic PAM, Flexible Growth Medium and/or a County-approved equivalent shall be applied to
denuded areas during construction and at final stabilization in the locations shown on plans approved by
Environmental Engineering at the time of plan review. (EE)
Page 225 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 12 of 18
REQUEST: Rezoning from General Business (C-5) to Neighborhood Business (C-2) plus Conditional Use
Planned Development (“CUPD”) to permit an ordinance exception, as described herein, for property known
as Chesterfield County Tax Identification Number 706-666-6493.
1. Parking Setback on Baldwin Creek Road. The setback along Baldwin Creek Road shall be no less
than forty (40) feet from the existing right-of-way line, as generally shown on the Concept Plan.
Perimeter Landscaping C shall be installed within this setback area.
Textual Statement - Ordinance Exceptions (1/8/2021)
Page 226 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 13 of 18
Concept Plan – Exhibit A
Page 227 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 14 of 18
Elevations – Exhibit B
Page 228 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 15 of 18
Page 229 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 16 of 18
Applicant
• Applicant’s Agent:
Danielle Danzing (757-217-2097)
danielle.danzing@kimley-horn.com
• Applicant’s Contact:
Brent Skinner (843-864-4931)
bskinner@verdad.com
District Planning Commissioner
• Tommy Owens (804-869-2214)
owenstommy@chesterfield.gov
Staff
• Planning Department Case Manager: Ryan Ramsey (804-751-4474) ramseyrp@chesterfield.gov
• Budget & Management: Karen Bailey (804-751-4327) baileykl@chesterfield.gov
• Community Enhancement: Carl Schlaudt (804-318-8674) schlaudtc@chesterfield.gov
• Environmental Engineering: Rebeccah Rochet (804-748-1028) rochetr@chesterfield.gov
• Fire & Emergency Medical Services: Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
• Libraries: Jennifer Stevens (804-751-4998) stevensj@chesterfield.gov
• Parks & Recreation: Janit Llewellyn (804-751-4482) llewellynJa@chesterfield.gov
• Police: Steve Grohowski (804-751-4720) growhowskis@chesterfield.gov
• Schools: Atonja Allen (804-318-8740) atonja_allen@ccps.net
• Transportation - County Department of Transportation: Steve Adams (804-751-4461)
adamsst@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation: Willie Gordon (804-674-2907)
willie.gordon@vdot.virginia.gov
• Utilities: Randy Phelps (804-796-7126) phelpsc@chesterfield.gov
Case Contacts
Page 230 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 17 of 18
Mission & Service Profile
The mission of Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services (CFEMS) is to protect life, property and the environment.
This requires a comprehensive portfolio of services aimed at preventing fires, mitigating the impact of fires and disasters
on the community, and providing a timely and effective response when fires, medical and other emergencies occur.
Community risks, population growth and demographic changes, service demands, and response times are reviewed
annually and the need for additional Fire & EMS operating and capital resources in support of the department’s mission
is evaluated during the county’s annual budget and 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) processes.
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment
Chesterfield Fire and EMS participates in the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) program,
which rates a community’s fire protection capabilities in accordance with the Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS).
Using the FSRS, the ISO performs a comprehensive evaluation of a community’s fire department, water supply, emergency
communications and community risk reduction efforts. The resulting score establishes a PPC rating from 1 to 10, with
Class 1 being the best possible rating. Many insurance carriers reference a community’s PPC rating in establishing
insurance premiums. Generally, communities with a Class 1 rating enjoy lower insurance premiums than those
communities with a Class 10 rating. Chesterfield County has a current community classification of 2/2Y, however some
portions are classified as 10 or 10W based on the parameters indicated below.
Class 2 - within 5 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 2Y – within 5 miles of a fire station but not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10W – within 5-7 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10 – outside of 5 miles of a fire station and not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Appendix
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Page 231 of 399
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services 21SN0551 Page 18 of 18
Response Time Goals (Urban/Rural Zones)
Urban Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 7 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to
arrival of first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 4 minutes or less
travel time for the first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 8 minutes or less travel time for
deployment of an Effective Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Rural Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 12 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to arrival of
first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 9 minutes or less travel time for the
first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 13 minutes or less travel time for deployment of an Effective
Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Page 232 of 399
Request I: Rezoning from General Business (C‐5) to
Neighborhood Business (C‐2) with conditional use planned
development for an ordinance exception.
Request II: Exception to 18‐60 for a connection to the public
wastewater system.
Verdad Real Estate & Construction Services
21SN0551 –Matoaca
Case 21SN0551, located in the Matoaca Magisterial District, the applicant, Verdad Real
Estate & Construction Services, has two requests: Request I is rezoning from General
Business (C‐5) to Neighborhood Business (C‐2) with conditional use planned
development for an ordinance exception relative to a parking setback. The Request II is
an exception to Section 18‐60 of the Utility Ordinance for a connection to the public
wastewater system. A private septic system is proposed for the development.
1Page 233 of 399
21SN0551 –Zoning Map
The Property contains 1.7 acres and is zoned General Business (C‐5). The Property is
located at the southeast quadrant of Hull Street and Baldwin Creek Roads.
2Page 234 of 399
21SN0551 –Aerial & Land Use Plan Map
Development of the Property for a convenience store with gasoline sales is planned. As
proposed, the project would be serviced by a private septic system. The aerial shows
the Property as presently being undeveloped and wooded.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for Corporate Office/Research &
Development/Light Industrial (CORLI), which suggests the Property is appropriate for
corporate office, research, laboratories, and light manufacturing and assembly uses
that are generally dependent upon raw materials first processed elsewhere. While this
designation does not support commercial uses, staff notes that the Property’s small
size and being adjacent to another retail/commercial use supports flexibility to consider
limited commercial uses. Staff finds that there is likely not enough developable space
for a project in this immediate area to be developed for CORDI uses.
3Page 235 of 399
21SN0551 –Concept Plan (Exhibit A)
The applicant proposes to develop the Property for a convenience store with gas
fueling stations, drives and parking areas, shown in the concept plan on this slide.
Parking and gas fueling stations will be in front of the property, adjacent to Hull Street
Road. The convenience store building, best management practice facility, trash
enclosure and private septic tank will be located behind the parking and gas fueling
stations. Access to the property will be from Baldwin Creek Road and a private drive
aisle from the adjacent property to the east.
4Page 236 of 399
21SN0551 –Parking Setback Reduction
Area for
Reduction of
Parking Setback
An exception for a reduced parking setback from Baldwin Creek Road, generally shown
in the proffered Concept Plan and outlined in the Textual Statement, is generally shown
in the current slide. The required major arterial yard setback along Baldwin Creek Road
for parking is either seventy‐five (75) feet with Landscaping B or fifty (50) feet with
Landscaping C. A forty (40) foot setback from the existing right‐of‐way line is proposed.
Perimeter landscaping required within a 50’ setback will still be planted within the
reduced setback area.
5Page 237 of 399
21SN0551 –Elevations (Exhibit B)
This slide shows the various building elevations for the convenience store. The
applicant has proffered a condition that aims to establish a level of quality architecture
and design standards for the project. Proffered Condition 2 establishes the architecture
of the building and gas canopy per the elevation drawings in Exhibit B. The elevations
depict a building that will be consistent with the style and building materials of other
buildings within adjoining blocks.
6Page 238 of 399
21SN0551 –Elevations (Exhibit B)
This slide shows the various elevations for the convenience store’s gas fueling station
canopy and trash enclosure.
7Page 239 of 399
21SN0551 –Exception to 18‐60 of Utility Ordinance
The request site is within a mandatory connection area for public water and
wastewater for new non‐residential development. While public water is available,
public wastewater is not available. The closest line that could be extended to provide
service by gravity is located approximately 2,260 feet east of the request site. The
applicant is requesting an exception to the mandatory wastewater connection
requirement.
To address the Utilities Departments concerns with this request, and in keeping with
other similar wastewater connection exception requests, the applicant has submitted
proffers which: 1) Requires connection to the public water system with site
development 2) Provides for the dedication of public wastewater easements to
facilitate future service to adjacent properties 3) Requires extension to property and
connection of all uses requiring domestic wastewater if the public wastewater system is
extended to within 200 feet of the property and 4) Ties the exception to the 1.72 acre
request site provided use is limited to a 7‐Eleven type facility.
The Board of Supervisors approved a wastewater connection exception request with
case 18SN0736 for a mini‐warehouse facility located east of the request site at 17101
Hull Street Road.
8Page 240 of 399
21SN0551 – Recommendations
1. Planning Commission Recommendations:
A. Request I (Rezoning & CUPD) ‐Approval.
B. Request II (Connection to Public Wastewater) ‐Approval.
2. Staff Recommendations:
A. Request I (Rezoning & CUPD) ‐Approval.
B. Request II (Connection to Public Wastewater) ‐Denial.
The Planning Commission, with a unanimous vote, recommends approval both Requests I & II.
For Request I, staff finds that rezoning the Property from General Business (C‐5) to
Neighborhood Business (C‐2) will limit the scope of permitted commercial uses on the Property,
bringing it into closer alignment with those uses designated by Land Use Plan. Proffered
conditions will ensure a quality architectural design for the proposed development. The
reduction in the parking setback to forty (40) feet along Baldwin Creek Road will be minimized
with perimeter landscaping as typically required in a fifty (50) foot setback. Staff supports this
portion of the applicant’s request.
For Request II, the Utilities Department finds that there is no topographic or sewer capacity
limitations exist that would prevent connection to public wastewater system. Relief of public
utility connection will likely result in other properties seeking similar exceptions. The request
may adversely impact the extension of public wastewater system to area properties. Based on
County Code requirements, the Utilities Department does not support this request.
9Page 241 of 399
21SN0551 –Zoning Map
End of presentation.
10Page 242 of 399
21SN0551 –Overview
1. Request I –Rezone to C‐2 with an
exception to reduce parking
setback from Baldwin Creek Road
2. Request II –Exception to connect
to public wastewater
3. Planning Commission
recommends Approval of
Requests I & II
4. Staff recommends Approval of
Request I; Denial of Request II
Overview Slide.
Request I is to rezone from General Business (C‐5) to Neighborhood Business (C‐2) with
conditional use planned development (CUPD) for ordinance and development standard
exceptions relative to the parking setback along Baldwin Creek Road.
Request II is an exception to Section 18‐60 of the utility ordinance for connection to the
public wastewater system.
Development of the Property for a convenience store with gasoline sales is planned. As
proposed, the project would be serviced by a private septic system. The Property is
located within a mandatory wastewater connection area, necessitating an exception to
connect to the public wastewater use.
Staff Recommendations:
APPROVAL –REQUEST I
Rezoning the Property from General Business (C‐5) to Neighborhood Business (C‐2) will
limit the scope of permitted commercial uses on the Property, bringing it into closer
alignment with those uses designated by Land Use Plan. Proffered conditions will
11Page 243 of 399
ensure a quality architectural design for the proposed development. The reduction in
the parking setback to forty (40) feet along Baldwin Creek Road will be minimized with
perimeter landscaping as typically required in a fifty (50) foot setback.
DENIAL – REQUEST II
No topographic or sewer capacity limitations exist that would prevent connection to
public wastewater system. Relief of public utility connection will likely result in other
properties seeking similar exceptions. The request may adversely impact the extension
of public wastewater system to area properties.
Planning Commission Recommendations:
The Planning Commission unanimously approved both Requests I & II.
11Page 244 of 399
Page 245 of 399
Page 246 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 1 of 12
21SN0556 – Christian Life Church
Magisterial District – Matoaca
Agent – Kerry Hutcherson (804-748-3600)
BOS Public Hearing – April 28, 2021
Time Remaining
365 Days
Case Manager
Ryan Ramsey
(804-751-4474)
Request
Utility Waiver
A church, served by a private septic system, is proposed.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval
Staff Recommendations
Approval - Planning
Denial - Utilities
The Property
4150 Lakeview Road
Site Size
10.1 Acres
Comprehensive Plan –
Land Use Designation
Suburban Residential II
Plan Area
County Wide Plan
Figure 1: Aerial of Request Area – Click Image for Link to GIS
Figure 2: Area Map of Request & Land Use Plan Map
Development of the Property for a church (The Sanctuary) is planned. The Sanctuary would be served by public water
and a private septic system. The Property is located within a mandatory water and wastewater connection area,
necessitating an exception to Section 18-60 of the County Code for connection to the public wastewater system.
Conditions would limit this development to a church, provide utility easements for future extension of the County
public wastewater system, and require connection to the public wastewater system in the event the system is
extended within 200 feet of the subject property.
The Planning Commission recommended approval subject to the conditions in this staff report.
Subsequent to the Planning Commission hearing, Condition 1 was revised by staff to have a revised
description of the property and remove the term “worship center”. “Worship Center” is now replaced with
“church and other uses accessory to a church”. This revision describes the use in accordance with the
Zoning Ordinance and provides flexibility to permit accessory uses typically associated with a church use.
Summary of Proposal
Page 247 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 2 of 12
PLANNING COMMISSION- APPROVAL
PLANNING - APPROVAL
Proposed use is permitted by right today and complies with the Land Use Plan designation within the Comprehensive
Plan. As conditioned, easements for public wastewater would facilitate future utility extensions.
UTILITIES - DENIAL
No topographic or sewer capacity limitations exist that would prevent connection to public wastewater system. Relief of
public utility connection will likely result in other properties seeking similar exceptions. The request may adversely impact
the extension of public wastewater system to area properties.
NOTE FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. Conditions may be imposed.
2. Proffered conditions presented in the Planning Commission staff report were withdrawn by the applicant on March
18, 2021. Should the Board of Supervisors approve the applicant’s request, conditions recommended by staff are
located in the “Conditions” section of the staff report.
UTILITIES
• No topographic or sewer capacity limitations exist that would prevent connection to public wastewater system
• Failure to extend public wastewater system to the subject property will adversely affect:
o Achieving the highest and best land uses suggested by the Comprehensive Plan
o Public utility service to area properties that currently use private septic systems
• Relief of public wastewater connection could result in other properties seeking similar exceptions
Recommendations
Summary of Identified Topics
Page 248 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 3 of 12
Summary of Proposal .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
Summary of Identified Topics ................................................................................................................................................. 2
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Planning................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Current Zoning Map ................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Supplemental Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 6
Community Enhancement .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Environmental Engineering ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................... 6
Transportation - County Department of Transportation .................................................................................................... 7
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation ................................................................................................... 7
Utilities – Water and Wastewater ...................................................................................................................................... 7
Community Engagement & Public Hearings ........................................................................................................................... 8
Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Proffered Conditions (3/9/2021) ............................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Case Contacts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10
Appendix ............................................................................................................................................................................... 11
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................. 11
Table of Contents
Page 249 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 4 of 12
Comprehensive Plan – Land Use Plan Designation
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for Suburban Residential II, which suggests the Property is appropriate
for residential development at a maximum density of 2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre.
Proposal
A church (The Sanctuary), which is permitted by right in the Agricultural (A) District, is planned. The property is located
within a mandatory water and wastewater connection area. As proposed, the church would be served by public water
and a private septic system. The proposal requires an exception to Section 18-60 of the County Code to connect to the
public wastewater system.
Conditions would limit this development to a church, provide utility easements for future extension of the County public
wastewater system. In addition, a require connection to the public wastewater system when the system is extended
within 200’ of the subject property.
Exceptions to Mandatory Wastewater Connection
Section 18-60 of the County Code requires the use of public systems for properties located within the Mandatory
Wastewater Connection Area. An exception to the use of public systems must be evaluated by the Directors of Utilities
and Planning, the Planning Commission, and subsequently by the Board of Supervisors. The decision of such exceptions
must be based upon the following criteria:
• Would the use of private systems encourage future area development inconsistent with the Comprehensive
Plan; and
• Would the ability to extend the public system to other property be adversely affected
Planning staff finds this request to use a private septic system limited to a church on the Property, as conditioned,
complies with the Comprehensive Plan and would not adversely affect the ability to extend the public wastewater
system to other properties.
Planning
Page 250 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 5 of 12
Current Zoning Map
Page 251 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 6 of 12
No comment on this request.
No comment on this request.
Service Area
The Harrowgate Fire Station, Company Number 21
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment*
Insurance Service Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) Class 2
Anticipated Impacts On Fire & EMS
Call Load in Immediate Service Area During Previous Fiscal Year 1866
Projected Calls Generated Yearly by Proposed Development N/A
(commercial)
Projected Call Load Increase in Immediate Service Area by Proposed Development N/A
Drive And Response Times
Response Zone/Response Time Goal* Rural / 12
Minutes
Road Miles from Closest Fire Station 2.92 miles
Estimated Drive Time from Closest Fire Station1 4:20 minutes
Estimated Response Time for First Unit on Scene2 7:20 minutes
Planned Capital Facility Improvements
Additional Information
When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire
protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process.
*Additional information relative to Fire & Life Safety’s Mission and Service Profile, Community Fire
Protection Capabilities Assessment, and Response Time Goals can be found in the Appendix.
1 Drive-time estimates are exclusive of potential delays due to weather, traffic, or blockage of response routes.
2 Estimates assume response units and personnel are in the station and available to respond at the time of an incident and include 1 min
30 sec for 911 call processing and dispatch, and up to 1 min 30 sec for firefighter turnout.
Supplemental Analysis
Community Enhancement
Environmental Engineering
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Page 252 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 7 of 12
This request will have no impact on the transportation network.
No comment on this request.
1. The request site is within a mandatory connection area for public water and wastewater for new non-residential
development.
2. Public water is not available. The closest line is within the Forest View subdivision, approximately 550 feet from
the request site.
3. Public wastewater is not available. The closest line that could be extended to provide service by gravity is
located approximately 3,700 feet southeast of the request site.
a. An estimated cost for this extension is approximately $644,000.00. Should design analysis dictate that a
size larger than needed for this development would be appropriate, under County Code provisions the
extension would qualify for oversizing refunds.
b. There are no physical conflicts or system capacity limitations that would make this extension unfeasible.
c. The applicant is requesting an exception to the mandatory wastewater connection requirement.
4. To address the Utilities Departments concerns, and in keeping with other similar wastewater connection
exception requests, the applicant has submitted proffers which:
a. Ties the exception to the Property, as long as the use is limited to a church (and other uses accessory to
a church).
b. Provides for the dedication of public wastewater easements to facilitate future service to adjacent
properties.
c. Requires extension to property and connection of all structures if the public wastewater system is
extended to within 200 feet of the property.
d. Requires connection to the public water system with site development.
5. Based on County Code requirements, the Utilities Department does not support this request.
Transportation - County Department of Transportation
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation
Utilities – Water and Wastewater
Page 253 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 8 of 12
Community Meetings
2/11/2021 – Discussion Topics:
1. Policy for mandatory sewer connection for non-residential uses
2. Gravity sewer not available in the immediate area
3. Cost of extension for the planned sanctuary
4. Zoning conditions to limit uses to church and religious facilities
Planning Commission
3/16/2021: Citizen Comments: One citizen spoke to this request, relative to potential impacts that a private
wastewater system may have on nearby agricultural production.
Commission Discussion: Mr. Owens stated that the conditions would limit the uses and scope of
development on the Property, relative to the public wastewater exception request.
Recommendation: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS
Motion: Owens Second: Petroski
AYES: Freye, Owens, Hylton, Petroski, Sloan
Community Engagement & Public Hearings
Page 254 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 9 of 12
Staff Note: Subsequent to the Planning Commission hearing, Condition 1 was revised by staff to have a
revised description of the property and remove the term “worship center”. The following conditions are
recommended by staff, should the Board of Supervisors approve the exception request.
1. Uses. The exception to the use of the public wastewater shall only apply to the 10.1 acre Property,
provided the use is limited to a church and other uses accessory to a church. Any development of the
Property for additional lots or uses, other than the aforementioned, shall be required to conform to the
Code at that time for the provision of public wastewater. (U)
2. Dedication of Public Wastewater Easements. Any site plan or building permit for the Property shall
provide and dedicate public wastewater easements in locations acceptable to the Utilities Department to
accommodate the future extension of the public wastewater system. Such easements shall be dedicated
prior to the site plan or building permit approval. (U)
3. Future Connection to Wastewater. In the event the public wastewater system is extended to a point
within 200 feet of the Property, the public wastewater system shall be extended to the property a point
acceptable to the Utilities Department and all uses requiring domestic wastewater shall be connected to
the public wastewater system. (U)
4. Public Water to be Used. The proposed development shall connect to the public water system. (U)
Conditions
Page 255 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 10 of 12
Applicant
• Applicant’s Agent:
Kerry Hutcherson (804-748-3600)
kerry@rudycoyner.com
• Applicant’s Contact:
Charlie Pavie (804-240-4614)
c_pavie@yahoo.com
District Planning Commissioner
• Gib Sloan (804-892-5633)
sloang@chesterfield.gov
Staff
• Planning Department Case Manager: Steve Haasch (804-796-7192) haaschs@chesterfield.gov
• Budget & Management: Karen Bailey (804-751-4327) baileykl@chesterfield.gov
• Community Enhancement: Carl Schlaudt (804-318-8674) schlaudtc@chesterfield.gov
• Environmental Engineering: Rebeccah Rochet (804-748-1028) rochetr@chesterfield.gov
• Fire & Emergency Medical Services: Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
• Libraries: Jennifer Stevens (804-751-4998) stevensj@chesterfield.gov
• Parks & Recreation: Janit Llewellyn (804-751-4482) llewellynJa@chesterfield.gov
• Police: Steve Grohowski (804-751-4720) growhowskis@chesterfield.gov
• Schools: Atonja Allen (804-318-8740) atonja_allen@ccps.net
• Transportation - County Department of Transportation: Steve Adams (804-751-4461)
adamsst@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation: Willie Gordon (804-674-2907)
willie.gordon@vdot.virginia.gov
• Utilities: Randy Phelps (804-796-7126) phelpsc@chesterfield.gov
Case Contacts
Page 256 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 11 of 12
Mission & Service Profile
The mission of Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services (CFEMS) is to protect life, property, and the environment.
This requires a comprehensive portfolio of services aimed at preventing fires, mitigating the impact of fires and disasters
on the community, and providing a timely and effective response when fires, medical and other emergencies occur.
Community risks, population growth and demographic changes, service demands, and response times are reviewed
annually and the need for additional Fire & EMS operating and capital resources in support of the department’s mission
is evaluated during the county’s annual budget and 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) processes.
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment
Chesterfield Fire and EMS participates in the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) program,
which rates a community’s fire protection capabilities in accordance with the Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS).
Using the FSRS, the ISO performs a comprehensive evaluation of a community’s fire department, water supply, emergency
communications and community risk reduction efforts. The resulting score establishes a PPC rating from 1 to 10, with
Class 1 being the best possible rating. Many insurance carriers reference a community’s PPC rating in establishing
insurance premiums. Generally, communities with a Class 1 rating enjoy lower insurance premiums than those
communities with a Class 10 rating. Chesterfield County has a current community classification of 2/2Y; however, some
portions are classified as 10 or 10W based on the parameters indicated below.
Class 2 - within 5 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 2Y – within 5 miles of a fire station but not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10W – within 5-7 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10 – outside of 5 miles of a fire station and not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Appendix
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Page 257 of 399
Christian Life Church 21SN0556 Page 12 of 12
Response Time Goals (Urban/Rural Zones)
Urban Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 7 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to
arrival of first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 4 minutes or less
travel time for the first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 8 minutes or less travel time for
deployment of an Effective Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Rural Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 12 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to arrival of
first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 9 minutes or less travel time for the
first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 13 minutes or less travel time for deployment of an Effective
Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Page 258 of 399
Exception to Section 18‐60 of the Utility Ordinance for
connection to the wastewater system in an Agricultural (A)
District.
Christian Life Center, Inc
21SN0556 –Matoaca
Case 21SN0556, located in the Matoaca Magisterial District, the applicant, Christian
Life Center, requests an exception to Section 18‐60 of the Utility Ordinance requiring
a connection to public wastewater. A private septic system is proposed for the
development.
1Page 259 of 399
21SN0556 – Utilities Map
Christian Life Center intends to build a church sanctuary on this property. The area is
required by code to connect to the public wastewater system. In order to serve the
request property with public wastewater, a 3,700‐foot extension from the nearest
trunk wastewater line, located in Old Town Creek, would be needed and is shown by
the dashed green line on this graphic. This extension is estimated to cost around
$640,000. The applicant has offered to connect to the public wastewater system once
lines have moved closer to this property. Utilities staff recommends denial as the
request is not in line with the Utility Code of the ordinance.
As part of this exception request, the applicant’s request would be conditioned to
limit the use of the property to the church sanctuary only. Because of the limited
nature of this by‐right use in an agricultural district, the proposal would not
negatively impact further development of the area. Therefore, planning staff
recommends approval of this request.
2Page 260 of 399
21SN0556 – Recommendations
1. Planning Commission Recommendation ‐Approval
2. Staff Recommendations:
Planning Staff ‐Approval with Conditions
Utilities Staff ‐Denial
The Planning Commission, with a unanimous vote, recommends approval of the
exception request. The Commission noted that the conditions would limit the uses
and scope of development on the Property, relative to the public wastewater
exception request.
Subsequent to the Planning Commission hearing, staff advised the applicant that
proffered conditions cannot be accepted since this request is solely for an exception
to Section 18‐60 of the County Code. On March 18, 2021, the applicant withdrew
each of these Proffered Conditions. The conditions presented in this report reflect the
applicant’s previously proffered conditions, with two (2) minor modifications.
Condition 1 has a revised description of the property and no longer contains the term
“worship center”. “Worship Center” is now replaced with “church or other uses
accessory to a church”. Should the Board of Supervisors approve this exception
request, staff recommends the imposition of conditions outlined in this report.
Given the limited nature of this use and the nature of the area around this property,
planning staff recommends approval of this request. However, utilities staff continues
to recommend denial as the request is against the utility code calling for the provision
of public wastewater in this area.
3Page 261 of 399
21SN0556 –Zoning Map
End of Presentation.
4Page 262 of 399
21SN0556 –Overview
1. Church (The Sanctuary) is
planned on site
2. Nearest wastewater line is
3,700 feet away
3. Conditions would limit use to
church only
4. Staff ‐Planning recommends
approval; Utilities
recommends denial
5. Commission ‐Approval
Overview Slide:
Christian Life Center intends to build a church sanctuary on this property. The area is
required by code to connect to the public wastewater system. Staff finds that the
nearest wastewater extension is approximately 3,700 feet away from the subject
property. The applicant is offering to limit the use of the property to the church
sanctuary only. Because of the limited nature of this by‐right use in an agricultural
district should not negatively impact further development of the area, planning staff
recommends approval of this request. However, utilities staff recommends denial as
the request is not in line with the Utility Code of the ordinance.
5Page 263 of 399
21SN0556 –Aerial & Land Use Plan Map
Extra Slide: The subject property is located along the north side of Lakeview Road
near its intersection with Branders Bridge Road in southeastern Chesterfield County.
The Comprehensive Plan recommends this area for Suburban Residential II uses (2‐4
units/acre). However, this density of development is dependent upon the extension
of wastewater lines into this generally rural area.
6Page 264 of 399
21SN0556 – Proffered Conditions
1. Use is limited to worship center only
2. Utility easements to be dedicated to county
3. When public wastewater within 200 feet of property, will
connect at that time
4. Will connect to public water system
Extra Slide: The applicant has offered several conditions to mitigate any negative
impacts on area development. They are limiting the use to a worship center only, will
dedicate utility easements to county to provide for future line extensions, will
connect to the public wastewater system when lines are within 200 feet of their
property, and will connect to the public water system with their development.
7Page 265 of 399
Page 266 of 399
Page 267 of 399
Page 268 of 399
Page 269 of 399
Page 270 of 399
Page 271 of 399
Amendment of zoning approval (Case 88SN0059) relative to
density and type of dwelling units in the Residential
Townhouse (R-TH) and Corporate Office (O-2) Districts.
CP4 Development, LLC
21SN0561 – Clover Hill
This case is in the Clover Hill District, and the applicant is requesting an amendment
of zoning approval (Case 88SN0059) relative to density and type of dwelling units and
amendment of zoning district map in the Residential Townhouse (R-TH) and
Corporate Office (O-2) Districts.
1Page 272 of 399
21SN0561 – Overview
1. Increase in permitted
dwelling units from 1639 to
1800
•161 additional units
requested
2. Multifamily as a permitted
use in this located has been
previously approved
3. Commission and Staff
recommend approval
The applicant is requesting to increase the total number of dwelling units permitted
within the CenterPointe Development from 1639 to 1800, which is an increase of 161
units. The property where a new multi-family development is planned is known as
Parcel 4A within the Centerpointe Schematic Plan, generally located along the east
side of Route 288, south of Lucks Lane. The Planning Commission and Staff
recommend approval with the proffered conditions and do not anticipate and
adverse impacts as a result of the request.
2Page 273 of 399
21SN0561 – Zoning Map
The property where the applicant plans to construct a new multi-family development
is known as Parcel 4A within the CenterPointe Schematic Plan, generally located
along the east side of Route 288, south of Lucks Lane.
3Page 274 of 399
21SN0561 – Aerial & Land Use Plan Map
This is an arial of the site and excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan. As you can see,
the site is currently undeveloped and properties to the north and east are developed
as single-family residential, and to the west is planned as commercial within the
CenterPointe development. The land use plan designation for the site is Medium to
High Density Residential.
4Page 275 of 399
21SN0561 – CenterPointe Schematic Plan
With this amendment, the applicant is requesting to increase the total number of
dwelling units permitted within the Centerpoint Development from 1639 to 1800,
which is an increase of 161 units. Parcel 4A, circled in green above, is the location
within the Centerpointe Schematic Plan where the multi-family development is
planned, necessitating the requested increase in unit count.
5Page 276 of 399
21SN0561 – Recommendation(s)
Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval
The Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval with the proffered
conditions. No known adverse impacts as a result of the proposal have been
identified.
6Page 277 of 399
21SN0561 – Zoning Map
7Page 278 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 1 of 16
21SN0561 – CP4 Development, LLC
Magisterial District – Clover Hill
Agent – Chris Corrada (804-643-4200)
BOS Public Hearing – April 28, 2021
Time Remaining
365 Days
Case Manager
Harold Ellis
(804-768-7592)
Request
Amend Prior case
Amend prior zoning approval to permit an increase in density.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval
Staff Recommendation
Approval
The Property
12801 Lucks Lane
Site Size
32.5 Acres
Comprehensive Plan –
Land Use Designation
Medium-High Density Residential
Plan Area
County Wide Plan
Figure 1: Aerial of Request Area – Click Image for Link to GIS
Figure 2: Area Map of Request & Land Use Plan Map
Amend prior zoning approval relative to density. Specifically, amendment to Proffered Condition #3 of Case 88SN0059 is proposed
to increase the total number of permitted dwelling units from 1639 to 1800 for the CenterPointe development, which is currently
under construction.
Summary of Proposal
Page 279 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 2 of 16
PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVAL
STAFF - APPROVAL
Planning recommends approval with the proffered conditions.
NOTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. Conditions may be imposed, or the property owner may proffer conditions.
2. Proffered conditions have been submitted by the applicant.
Recommendations
Page 280 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 3 of 16
Summary of Proposal .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Planning................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Current Zoning Map ................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Supplemental Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 6
Community Enhancement .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Environmental Engineering ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................... 6
Libraries ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Parks & Recreation .............................................................................................................................................................. 7
Schools ................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Transportation - County Department of Transportation .................................................................................................... 8
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation ................................................................................................... 8
Utilities – Water and Wastewater ...................................................................................................................................... 8
Community Engagement & Public Hearings ........................................................................................................................... 9
Proffered Conditions (3/08/2021) ........................................................................................................................................ 10
CenterPointe Schematic Plan – Exhibit A .............................................................................................................................. 11
Previously Approved Case (88SN0059) ................................................................................................................................. 12
Case Contacts ........................................................................................................................................................................ 13
Appendix ............................................................................................................................................................................... 14
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................. 14
Schools .............................................................................................................................................................................. 16
Table of Contents
Page 281 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 4 of 16
Zoning History
86SN0025: Approved (4/1986)
Rezoning from Office (O) and Residential Townhouse (R-TH) to Residential (R-7); from Residential (R-7) to Community Business (B-2);
and from Agricultural (A), Residential (R-7), Residential (R-15), Residential Townhouse (R-TH), Community Business (B-2), and Light
Industrial (M-1) to Office Business (O) and Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a mixed-use development consisting of
residential, office, commercial and industrial land uses.
88SN0059: Approved (7/1990)
Amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development to permit use and bulk exceptions (86S0025). The applicant requested to
supersede the Textual Statement, Master Plan, and conditions of zoning approval to shift land uses due to the location of Route 288
Extended.
Comprehensive Plan – Land Use Plan Designation
The Comprehensive Plan designates the Property for Medium-High Density Residential, which suggests the Property is
appropriate for residential development at a maximum density of 4.0 to 8.0 dwellings per acre.
Proposal
The applicant is proposing to amend prior zoning approval (Case 88SN0059, Condition #3) to increase the total number
of permitted dwelling units from 1639 to 1800 in order to construct a multifamily development on parcel 4A of the
previously approved CenterPointe Schematic Plan (attached). The multifamily use has been previously approved on this
parcel, also illustrated on the Schematic Plan. This case focuses solely on the increase in number of multifamily units,
from 1639 to 1800, resulting in 161 more units than previously approved.
Design
High quality residential development addresses the Comprehensive Plan goals for strong and sustainable neighborhoods
that are visually attractive, well-planned, and well-maintained. Further, the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance
to promote the health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the public includes the creation of convenient,
attractive and harmonious communities, protection against overcrowding of land, and protection of the natural
environment. As such, developments that promote unique, viable and long-lasting places and enhance the community
are encouraged.
Planning
Page 282 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 5 of 16
Current Zoning Map
Page 283 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 6 of 16
No comment on this request.
No comment on this request.
Service Area
The Swift Creek Fire Station, Company Number 16
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment*
Insurance Service Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) Class 2
Anticipated Impacts On Fire & EMS
Call Load in Immediate Service Area During Previous Fiscal Year 1877
Projected Calls Generated Yearly by Proposed Development 358
Projected Call Load Increase in Immediate Service Area by Proposed Development 19%
Drive And Response Times
Response Zone/Response Time Goal* Urban / 7
Minutes
Road Miles from Closest Fire Station 2.76 miles
Estimated Drive Time from Closest Fire Station1 3:45
minutes
Estimated Response Time for First Unit on Scene2 6:45
minutes
Planned Capital Facility Improvements
Additional Information
When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire
protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process.
*Additional information relative to Fire & Life Safety’s Mission and Service Profile, Community
Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment, and Response Time Goals can be found in the Appendix.
1 Drive-time estimates are exclusive of potential delays due to weather, traffic, or blockage of response routes.
2 Estimates assume response units and personnel are in the station and available to respond at the time of an incident and include 1
min 30 sec for 911 call processing and dispatch, and up to 1 min 30 sec for firefighter turnout.
Supplemental Analysis
Community Enhancement
Environmental Engineering
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Page 284 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 7 of 16
Nearby Facility(s)
• North Courthouse, Midlothian
• While all county libraries could be potentially impacted by the proposed development, the North Courthouse and
Midlothian Libraries are the closest library facilities to the Property.
• Public Facilities Plan suggests the Midlothian Library should be replaced with a new facility on the current site.
No comments provided for this case.
This is an amendment to the previously approved rezoning case (88SN0059) for the CenterPointe development currently
under construction. This application proposes to increase the total number of permitted dwelling units for the overall
development from 1,639 to 1,800. For the housing unit count difference of 161 MF units, total additional potential student
yield ranges from 31 to 55 students.
Membership and Capacity (2020-21SY) Zoning Case 21SN0561
Current
Enrollment
(09-30-2020) (3)
Program
Capacity (1)
Percent
Program
Capacity
Proposed
Number
of Units
Housing
Type
SGF 2019(2) Anticipated Student
Yield Range
School-
specific
Countywide
Average
School-
specific
Countywide
Average
EVERGREEN
ES
(PK to 5)
873 1,063 88%
- SF 0.2136 0.2061 - -
161 MF 0.0437 0.1681 7 27
- TH 0.0423 0.1063 - -
161 Total 7 27
TOMAHAWK
CREEK MS
(6 to 8)
1,648 1,466 112%
- SF 0.1563 0.1131 - -
161 MF 0.0680 0.0813 11 13
- TH 0.0286 0.0627 - -
161 Total 11 13
MIDLOTHIAN
HS
(9 to 12)
1,908 1,963 97%
- SF 0.1812 0.1540 - -
161 MF 0.0793 0.0948 13 15
- TH 0.0977 0.0936 - -
161 Total 13 15
Note:
(1) Program capacity is the maximum number of students the building can accommodate based on the Virginia Department of Education
Standards of Quality and the current school programming that may adjust the number of rooms used for core or grade-level classrooms in
the overall building design capacity. Program capacity numbers may be higher than previous years due to more spaces being
designated/quantified for capacity uses.
(2) Student Generation Factor (2019) is the actual total number of students by grade level divided by the actual total number of housing
units by housing type. Based upon the average number of students per multifamily dwelling unit for each of the school attendance zones
where the proposal is located. Updated 2019 SGFs provided by County IST.
(3) Current enrollment numbers may be lower than previous years. The reduction is primarily attributed to COVID-19.
School Capacity Analysis
Evergreen Elementary School: Current capacity at 88%. The StratIS (Strategic Information Sharing) model with
tabulated results from December 9, 2020, predicting the change in students based on geographical regions, shows that
there could be an increase of approximately 94 students for the 2024 forecast in the Evergreen attendance zone.
Libraries
Parks & Recreation
Schools
Page 285 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 8 of 16
Tomahawk Creek Middle School: Current capacity at 112%. The StratIS model with tabulated results from December 9,
2020, predicting the change in students based on geographical regions, shows that there could be an increase of
approximately 40 students for the 2024 forecast in the Tomahawk Creek attendance zone. Since this school is above
100% program capacity, which consequently presents impacts on available seats, student transportation, and safety and
security operations, staff is exploring strategies for addressing capacity - to include redistricting, program relocation or
increasing available capacity.
Midlothian High School: Current capacity at 97%. The StratIS model with tabulated results from December 9, 2020,
predicting the change in students based on geographical regions, shows that there could be an increase of
approximately 90 students for the 2024 forecast in the Midlothian High attendance zone. As this school is approaching
100% of its program capacity, its enrollment and capacity will continue to be closely monitored.
Additional information on CCPS Mission and Capital Improvements can be found in the Appendix.
The Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Thoroughfare Plan, identifies county-wide transportation needs that are
expected to mitigate traffic impacts of future growth. The anticipated traffic impact of the proposal has been evaluated.
Development shall not exceed the density as established by Case 88SN0059 as approved by the Transportation
Department (9,337 AM Peak Hour Trips and 11,533 PM Peak Hour Trips). This request will not change the maximum
density or road improvements; therefore, staff supports this request.
Maximum Density (Textual Statement III.D.1 of Case 88SN0059)
Maximum Density of this development shall be as follows: 910 units of Medium Density Residential, 729 units of Single
Family Residential, 248,000 square feet (sf) of Office Research/Development, 3,320,000 sf of Office (Low, Medium, and
High density), 550,000 sf of Shopping Center/Retail (Retail, Neighborhood, and Specialty), and 640 Room Hotel, or
equivalent densities as approved by the Transportation Department.
The applicant is requesting to amend the prior zoning condition for the subject property to adjust the type of residential
development permitted, but subject to the previously approved traffic generation for the property. Since the requested
amendment will not impact the overall allowable trip generation for the site, VDOT has no comments regarding this
request at this time.
1. The request site is within a mandatory connection area for public water and wastewater for new residential
development.
2. Included in Case 86SN0025, is a condition (17) requiring use of the public water and wastewater systems. (Case
88SN0059 was an amendment to the previous 1986 case)
3. Public water and wastewater lines are available.
4. To address wastewater capacity concerns due to the requested increase in density, the applicant has proffered
to perform a hydraulic analysis to verify available capacity, and to be responsible for any necessary system
improvements.
5. The Utilities Department supports this request.
Transportation - County Department of Transportation
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation
Utilities – Water and Wastewater
Page 286 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 9 of 16
Community Meetings
2/10/2021 – Discussion Topics:
1. Buffering between proposed apartments and existing adjacent single-family residential
2. Design details of proposed apartments including height, amenities, and exterior facades
3. Traffic along Lucks Lane
4. Maintenance of BMP’s
5. Timeframe of construction
Planning Commission
3/16/2021: Citizen Comments: No citizens spoke to the request.
Recommendation: APPROVAL WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS
Motion: Freye Second: Hylton
AYES: Freye, Owens, Hylton, Petroski and Sloan
Community Engagement & Public Hearings
Page 287 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 10 of 16
Staff Note: Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend acceptance of the following proffered conditions
offered by the applicant:
STATEMENT OF PROFFERS CP4 DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Zoning Case 21SN0561 February 24, 2021
March 2, 2021
March 8, 2021
1. Condition 3 of 88SN0059 shall be amended as follows:
a. In no case shall the maximum number of residential units exceed 1800.
b. No greater than 5% of the multifamily units in Parcel 4A will be constructed as three- bedroom units.
2. The developer shall perform a hydraulic analysis of the County’s wastewater system to verify adequate capacity
exists prior to any future construction plan approval. Any capacity related improvements required to support the
demands of this development shall be reflected on the construction plans and the responsibility of the developer.
Staff Note: All other conditions of Case 88SN0059 still apply.
Proffered Conditions (3/08/2021)
Page 288 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 11 of 16
CenterPointe Schematic Plan – Exhibit A
Page 289 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 12 of 16
Previously Approved Case (88SN0059)
Page 290 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 13 of 16
Applicant
• Applicant’s Agent:
Chris Corrada (804-643-4200)
ccorrada@riverg.com
District Planning Commissioner
• Gloria L. Freye, J.D. (804-768-7381)
freyeg@chesterfield.gov
Staff
• Planning Department Case Manager: Harold Ellis (804-768-7592) ellish@chesterfield.gov
• Budget & Management: Karen Bailey (804-751-4327) baileykl@chesterfield.gov
• Community Enhancement: Carl Schlaudt (804-318-8674) schlaudtc@chesterfield.gov
• Environmental Engineering: Rebeccah Rochet (804-748-1028) rochetr@chesterfield.gov
• Fire & Emergency Medical Services: Anthony Batten (804-717-6167) battena@chesterfield.gov
• Libraries: Jennifer Stevens (804-751-4998) stevensj@chesterfield.gov
• Parks & Recreation: Janit Llewellyn (804-751-4482) llewellynJa@chesterfield.gov
• Police: Steve Grohowski (804-751-4720) growhowskis@chesterfield.gov
• Schools: Atonja Allen (804-318-8740) atonja_allen@ccpsnet.net
• Transportation - County Department of Transportation: Steve Adams (804-751-4461)
adamsst@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation: Willie Gordon (804-674-2907)
willie.gordon@vdot.virginia.gov
• Utilities: Randy Phelps (804-796-7126) phelpsc@chesterfield.gov
Case Contacts
Page 291 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 14 of 16
Mission & Service Profile
The mission of Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services (CFEMS) is to protect life, property and the environment.
This requires a comprehensive portfolio of services aimed at preventing fires, mitigating the impact of fires and disasters
on the community, and providing a timely and effective response when fires, medical and other emergencies occur.
Community risks, population growth and demographic changes, service demands, and response times are reviewed
annually and the need for additional Fire & EMS operating and capital resources in support of the department’s mission
is evaluated during the county’s annual budget and 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) processes.
Community Fire Protection Capabilities Assessment
Chesterfield Fire and EMS participates in the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification (PPC) program,
which rates a community’s fire protection capabilities in accordance with the Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS).
Using the FSRS, the ISO performs a comprehensive evaluation of a community’s fire department, water supply, emergency
communications and community risk reduction efforts. The resulting score establishes a PPC rating from 1 to 10, with
Class 1 being the best possible rating. Many insurance carriers reference a community’s PPC rating in establishing
insurance premiums. Generally, communities with a Class 1 rating enjoy lower insurance premiums than those
communities with a Class 10 rating. Chesterfield County has a current community classification of 2/2Y; however, some
portions are classified as 10 or 10W based on the parameters indicated below.
Class 2 - within 5 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 2Y – within 5 miles of a fire station but not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10W – within 5-7 miles of a fire station and within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Class 10 – outside of 5 miles of a fire station and not within 1,000 feet of a fire hydrant.
Appendix
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Page 292 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 15 of 16
Response Time Goals (Urban/Rural Zones)
Urban Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 7 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to
arrival of first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 4 minutes or less
travel time for the first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 8 minutes or less travel time for
deployment of an Effective Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Rural Zone
Fire and EMS response goal is 12 minutes from receipt of call in the Emergency Communications Center (ECC) to arrival of
first responding unit. Fire and EMS facilities should be strategically located to provide 9 minutes or less travel time for the
first arriving engine company at a suppression incident, and 13 minutes or less travel time for deployment of an Effective
Firefighting Force (first alarm assignment) at a suppression incident.
Page 293 of 399
CP4 Development, LLC 21SN0561 Page 16 of 16
Mission
High performing, high quality public schools contribute to the quality of life and economic vitality of the County. The
comprehensive plan suggests a greater focus should be placed on linking schools with communities by providing greater
access, flexible designs and locations that better meet the needs of the communities in which they are located.
Capital Improvements
The School Board FY2021 adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) continues to support the 2013 voter approved school
revitalization program that will replace or renovate ten schools and construct one new elementary school to add capacity
in the Midlothian area of the county. The ten existing facilities that are part of the revitalization program are Beulah
Elementary School, Crestwood Elementary School, Enon Elementary School, Ettrick Elementary School, Harrowgate
Elementary School, Matoaca Elementary School, Reams Elementary School, Manchester Middle School, Providence
Middle School, and Monacan High School. A replacement Manchester Middle School is under construction on the existing
school site, a replacement Harrowgate Elementary School is under construction on a new site, and a replacement Matoaca
Elementary School is under construction on the site of the former Matoaca Middle School west campus building. The
Beulah Elementary School, Enon Elementary School, Old Hundred Elementary School (the new elementary school in the
Midlothian district), Providence Middle School, and Monacan High School projects are complete. The Matoaca Middle
School wing addition at the east campus site, an additional school construction project, is complete and the school now
operates as a single, unified campus. Information on the CIP and School Board approved construction projects can be
found in the financial section of the CCPS Adopted Budget for FY2021.
Schools
Page 294 of 399
Wynel & Sinclair Harris 21SN0571 Page 1 of 9
21SN0571 – Wynel & Sinclair Harris
Magisterial District - Bermuda
Agent – Wynel Harris (804-288-2459)
BOS Public Hearing - April 28, 2021
Time Remaining
365 Days
Case Manager
Steve Haasch
(804-796-7192)
Request
Conditional Use
To permit a family day care home
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval
Staff Recommendation
Approval
Property Location
13806 Thornhill Court
Site Size
1.3 Acres
Comprehensive Plan –
Land Use Designation
Suburban Residential II
Plan Area
County Wide Plan
Figure 1: Aerial of Request Area (VGIN 2016) – Click Image for Link to GIS
Figure 2: Area Map of Request & Land Use Plan Map
Request for a conditional use to permit a family day care from home in a Residential (R-12) District. The applicant
proposes to allow the keeping of up to 12 children, incidental to a dwelling.
Summary of Proposal
Page 295 of 399
Wynel & Sinclair Harris 21SN0571 Page 2 of 9
PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVAL
STAFF - APPROVAL
The Comprehensive Plan recommends this area is appropriate for residential uses. As conditioned, the use would be
compatible with surrounding residential development and the residential character of the area will be maintained.
NOTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
1. Conditions may be imposed or the property owner may proffer conditions.
2. Conditions have been identified in this report.
None
Recommendations
Summary of Identified Topics
Page 296 of 399
Wynel & Sinclair Harris 21SN0571 Page 3 of 9
Summary of Proposal .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
Summary of Identified Topics ................................................................................................................................................. 2
Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Planning................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Current Zoning Map ................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Supplemental Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 6
Community Enhancement .................................................................................................................................................. 6
Environmental Engineering ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Fire & Emergency Medical Services .................................................................................................................................... 6
Schools ................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
Transportation - County Department of Transportation .................................................................................................... 6
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation ................................................................................................... 6
Utilities – Water and Wastewater ...................................................................................................................................... 6
Community Engagement & Public Hearing ............................................................................................................................. 7
Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Case Contacts .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Table of Contents
Page 297 of 399
Wynel & Sinclair Harris 21SN0571 Page 4 of 9
Comprehensive Plan – Land Use Plan Designation
The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for Suburban Residential II, which suggests the property is
appropriate for residential development at a maximum density of 2.0 to 4.0 dwellings per acre.
Proposal
A family day care from the home, to allow the keeping of up to twelve (12) children, is proposed. Staff confirms there
have been no complaints filed on this property. The conditions of this request are in line with similar requests across the
county and should mitigate impacts on adjacent properties and the neighborhood.
Planning
Page 298 of 399
Wynel & Sinclair Harris 21SN0571 Page 5 of 9
Current Zoning Map
Page 299 of 399
Wynel & Sinclair Harris 21SN0571 Page 6 of 9
No comment on this request.
No comment on this request.
Service Area
The Rivers Bend Fire Station, Company Number 18
Additional Information
This request will have minimal impacts on Fire & Emergency Medical Services.
This request will have no impact on school facilities.
This request is anticipated to have a minimal impact on the transportation network.
VDOT has no comment at this time.
1. The existing residential structure is connected to the public water and wastewater systems.
2. The proposed family day care use will have minimal impact on the public water and wastewater systems.
3. The Utilities Department supports this request.
Supplemental Analysis
Community Enhancement
Environmental Engineering
Fire & Emergency Medical Services
Schools
Transportation - County Department of Transportation
Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation
Utilities – Water and Wastewater
Page 300 of 399
Wynel & Sinclair Harris 21SN0571 Page 7 of 9
Community Meeting
3/1/2021 – Discussion Topics:
No citizens were in attendance at this meeting.
Planning Commission
3/16/2021 – Citizen Comments: No citizens spoke to this request.
Recommendation: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS
Motion: Sloan Second: Petroski
AYES: Freye, Owens, Hylton, Petroski and Sloan
Community Engagement & Public Hearing
Page 301 of 399
Wynel & Sinclair Harris 21SN0571 Page 8 of 9
Both the Planning Commission and Staff recommend acceptance of the following conditions.
1. Non-Transferable Ownership: This conditional use approval shall be granted to and for Wynel and Sinclair Harris,
exclusively, and shall not be transferable nor run with the land. (P)
2. Expansion of Use: There shall be no exterior additions or alterations to the existing structure to accommodate this
use. (P)
3. Signage: There shall be no signs permitted to identify this use. (P)
4. Number of Children: This conditional use approval shall be limited to providing care, protection and guidance to a
maximum of twelve (12) children, other than the applicant’s own children, at any one time. (P)
5. Hours of Operation: Hours and days of operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
There shall be no Saturday or Sunday operation of this use. (P)
6. Time Limitation: This conditional use approval shall be granted for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
approval. (P)
7. Fenced Outdoor Play Areas: Any outdoor play area and/or recreational equipment utilized by the family daycare
home shall be located in the side or rear yard of the property. Outdoor play and/or recreational equipment areas
shall have perimeter fencing of at least four (4) feet in height, installed around the equipment or play area.
Equipment for outdoor play areas shall be located no closer than fifteen (15) feet to the side or rear property lines.
This fencing shall be installed within 120 days of approval of this request by the Board of Supervisors. (P)
8. Employees: No more than two (2) employees shall be permitted to work on the premises exclusive of family
member employees who live on the premises. (P)
Conditions
Page 302 of 399
Wynel & Sinclair Harris 21SN0571 Page 9 of 9
Applicant
• Applicant:
Wynel & Sinclair Harris
• Applicant’s Contact:
(757) 288-2459
District Planning Commissioner
• Gib Sloan (804-892-5633)
sloang@chesterfield.gov
Staff
• Planning Department Case Manager:
Steve Haasch (804-796-7192)
haaschs@chesterfield.gov
• Community Enhancement:
Carl Schlaudt (804-318-8674)
schlaudtc@chesterfield.gov
• Environmental Engineering:
Rebeccah Rochet (804-748-1028)
rochetr@chesterfield.gov
• Fire & Emergency Medical Services:
Anthony Batten (804-717-6167)
battena@chesterfield.gov
• Libraries:
Jennifer Stevens (804-751-4998)
stevensj@chesterfield.gov
• Parks & Recreation:
Janit Llewellyn (804-751-4482)
llewellynJa@chesterfield.gov
• Police:
Steve Grohowski (804-751-4720)
growhowskis@chesterfield.gov
• Schools:
Atonja Allen (804-318-8740)
atonja_allen@ccpsnet.net
• Transportation - County Department of Transportation:
Steve Adams (804-751-4461)
adamsst@chesterfield.gov
• Transportation - Virginia Department of Transportation:
Willie Gordon (804-674-2907)
willie.gordon@vdot.virginia.gov
• Utilities:
Randy Phelps (804-796-7126)
phelpsc@chesterfield.gov
Case Contacts
Page 303 of 399
Conditional use to permit a family day care home and
amendment of zoning district map in a Residential (R12)
District.
Wynel and Sinclair Aaron Harris
21SN0571 –Bermuda
The applicants, Wynel & Sinclair Harris, request a conditional use to permit a family
daycare from their home.
1Page 304 of 399
21SN0571 –Overview
1.Operate a day care from the
home
2.As conditioned, impacts on
neighborhood should be
minimal
3.Planning Commission &
Staff Recommend Approval
This request is typical of numerous similar requests in neighborhoods throughout the
county. Traditionally, impacts from these uses on adjacent properties have been
minimal. The residential feel of the neighborhood should be maintained via the
conditions in this case. Therefore, the Planning Commission and staff recommend
approval of this request.
2Page 305 of 399
21SN0571 –Aerial & Land Use Plan Map
The Harris’ property is a part of the Thornhill neighborhood. The request property is
surrounded by similar single family homes on subdivision lots in a well-established
community. The property is zoned for residential uses (R-9) and the comprehensive
plan recommends the same.
3Page 306 of 399
21SN0571 –Conditions
1.Non-Transferable Ownership
2.No Expansion of Use
3.No Signage
4.Limited to 12 children (other than applicant’s own)
5.Limited Hours of Operation (M-F, 6a-6p)
6.5-year limitation
7.Fenced Outdoor Play Areas (to be installed within 120 days)
8.Max of 2 employees (other than family members that live on premises)
The applicant has agreed to the standard conditions desired in these types of
requests. These conditions should mitigate any potential negative impacts on the
neighborhood from the operation of this use. Furthermore, a 5 -year time limit has
been placed on this use to allow the community to have an opportunity to discus this
use again once this use has been operating.
4Page 307 of 399
21SN0571 –Recommendation
Chesterfield County Planning Commission & Staff:
Approval with the Conditions Listed in the Report
Staff finds that the requested use will not be detrimental to the surrounding
neighborhood. Conditions as proposed should limit negative impacts on adjacent
properties and are typical of other such requests in the county. Therefore, the
Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of this request, with the
conditions listed.
5Page 308 of 399
21SN0571 –Zoning Map
6Page 309 of 399
Page 310 of 399
Page 311 of 399
Page 312 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 17.A.
Subject:
To Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 70’ Right of Way Known as Ashton Park Drive
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed
to convey a portion of excess right of way at the terminus of Ashton Park Drive.
Summary of Information:
Carrie E. Coyner, has requested the quitclaim of a portion of a 70’ right of way known as Ashton Park Drive,
as shown on the attached plat. This request is for the proposed development of Warehouse Distribution Center
at the Ashton Park Business Center at the terminus of Ashton Park Drive and has been reviewed by county staff
and VDOT.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.The Goodrich River Trust Agreement Quitclaim Sketch
2.The Goodrich River Trust Agreement Ouitclaim-Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 313 of 399
R U F F I N M I L L R D
A S H T O N P A R K D R
PORT WALTHALL DR
Board of Supervisors M eeting - April 28, 2021 Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 70’ Right of Way Known as Ashton Park Drive
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 500 feet
µ
Proposed 0.071 AcreParcel to be Quitclaimed
Page 314 of 399
Page 315 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 17.B.
Subject:
To Consider Conveyance of a 15' Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company for the Emergency
Communications Center
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an agreement
with Virginia Electric and Power Company for conveyance of a 15' underground easement for the Emergency
Communications Center.
Summary of Information:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company for a 15'
underground easement. This easement is necessary to install new automatic transfer switches for the
Emergency Communications Center. The switches will allow for automatic switching between two Dominion
services. These redundant services will provide additional protection to the Eanes Pittman Building,
specifically the Emergency Communications Center and the County's 911 call center, from utility power
outages at the local level.
This request has been reviewed by county staff.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.Emergency Communications Center Virginia Electric Easement Vicinity Sketch
2.Emergency Communications Center Virginia Electric Easement Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 316 of 399
MIMMS DR
L O R I L N
M I M M S L O O P
LUCY CORR BLVD
G O V E R N M E N T C E N T E R P K W Y
HUSTING RDWAGNERS W A Y
SAFETY BLVD
FORE DR
K R A U S E R D
L
O
R
I
R
D
P
U
B
L
I
C
S
A
F
E
T
Y
W
A
Y
F O R E C I R
L U C Y C O R R C I R
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Conveyance of a 15' Easement to Virginia Electric and PowerCompany for the Emergency Communications Center
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 300 feetsasekd 04-08-2021
µ
Emergency Communications Center9751 Government Center Pkwy9710 & 9900 Krause Road
Page 317 of 399
PROPERTY OF:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
9751 GOVERNMENT CENTER PY
CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832
GPIN: 7726633461
PROPERTY OF:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
9900 KRAUSE RD
CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832
GPIN: 7726639929
PROPERTY OF:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
9710 KRAUSE RD
CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832
GPIN: 7736630387
*
*
*
DOMINION POLE
L2342 VD78
DOMINION
TRANSFORMER
L2342 VD97
DOMINION
TRANSFORMER
L2342 WD36
PROPERTY OF:
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
9501 LUCY CORR CR
CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832
GPIN: 7726644430
15'
15'
1 5 '
15'
1
5
'
1 5 '
1
5
'
1
5
'
1
5
'
15'
1
5
'
3
5
'
+
/
-
8
5
'
+
/
-
1
0
5
'
+
/
-
1
6
0
'
+
/
-
120
'
+
/
-
140' +/-
190' +
/
-
200' +/-
70' +/-
22
0
'
+
/
-
Text
1 3 0 ' +/-1 7 0 ' +/-
100' +/-
50
'
+
/
-
*
DOMINION POLE
L2342 WD55
¥
Page 5 of 5OWNER INITIALS: ______________DATE:BY:
LEGEND District
District-Township-Borough County - City State
Office Plat Number
Work Request Number Grid Number
MIDLOTHIAN
CHESTERFIELD VA
MIDLOTHIAN 05-21-0016
L2342
3/4/2021 JOSH DOGGETT
DALE
PLAT TO ACCOMPANY
RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
doing business as
Dominion Energy Virginia
UG
Location of Boundary Lines of Right-of-Way
15' in Width.
Indicates Property Line is Right-of-Way
Boundary 15' in Width.PL
Scale NTS
10377675
Page 318 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 17.C.
Subject:
To Consider Conveyance of a 15' Easement to Virginia Electric and Power Company at the Ashbrook
Wastewater Pump Station
Board Action Requested:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an agreement
with Virginia Electric and Power Company for a 15’ underground easement at the Ashbrook Wastewater Pump
Station.
Summary of Information:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute an agreement with Virginia Electric and Power Company for a 15'
underground easement. This easement is necessary to convert overhead power to underground power at the
Ashbrook Wastewater Pump Station for the existing distribution line. This request has been reviewed by
county staff.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.Ashbrook Pump Station VEPCO Easement Sketch
2.Ashbrook Pump Station VEPCO Easement Plat
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 319 of 399
H U L L S T R E E T R D
A S H B R O O K P K W Y
A S H L A K E P K W Y
O F F S H O R E D R
A S H L A K E C M N
S
H
A
D
Y
B
A
N
K
S
D
R
B R O A D R E A C H D R
GROUND FERN DR
H U L L S T R E E T R D
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021Conveyance of an Easement to Virginia Electric and Pow er Company for a 15’ Underground Easement Across Ashbrook Sewer Pump Station
Chesterfield CountyReal Property Office
1 inch = 400 feet
µ
Proposed Underground VEPCO Easement
Page 320 of 399
2
8
0
'
2
2
5
'
LEGEND
D
o
m
i
n
i
o
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
P
a
g
e
3
2
1
o
f
3
9
9
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 17.D.
Subject:
To Adopt an Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of Omo Road within Ampthill Gardens Section 1
Board Action Requested:
Adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of Omo Road within Ampthill Gardens Section 1.
Summary of Information:
Mark T. Motley submitted an application requesting the vacation of a portion of Omo Road within Ampthill
Gardens Section 1. This request has been reviewed by VDOT, county staff, Comcast Cablevision, Dominion
Energy and Verizon.
Approval is recommended.
Attachments:
1.Omo Road Vicinity Sketch Vacation
2.Omo Road Vacation Ordinance
Preparer:Dean Sasek, Real Property Manager
Approved By:
Page 322 of 399
:1 inch = 2 00 fee t
Chesterfield County Real Property Office
Portion of Omo Road to be Vacated
Mark T. Motley ET ALGPIN #775681368400000D.B. 8778 Pg. 513
Om o RD
I R O N B R I D G E R D
IRONGATE DR
I R O N B R I D G E R D
Mark T. MotleyGPIN #775681405200000D.B. 10914 Pg. 734
Board of Supervisors Meeting - April 28, 2021To Adopt an Ordinance to Vacate a Portion ofOmo Road with in Ampthill G ard ens Section 1
Page 323 of 399
\\JOB-CC-AZ-001\TempUpload\824c74d26f\stream/CHESTERFIELDCOVA/75f2ef6c87.docx/jls/ah/Omo Road
GIS CODE:VAC
PINS:775 681 4052 00000
775 681 3684 00000
Document No:2021-0209
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY: At a
regular meeting of the Board of
Supervisors held at the Courthouse on
APRIL 28, 2021 at 6:00 p.m.
AN ORDINANCE whereby the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA, ("GRANTOR") vacates to MARK T. MOTLEY,
CHIOCCA REALTY, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company,
and CHIOCCA, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company,
("GRANTEES"), a portion of Omo Road within Ampthill Gardens
Section 1 Subdivision, DALE Magisterial District, Chesterfield
County, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the
Clerk’s Office, Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat
Book 7, Pages 62-63.
WHEREAS, Mark T. Motley petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,
Virginia to vacate a portion of Omo Road within Ampthill Gardens Section 1 Subdivision, Dale
Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, more particularly shown on a plat thereof duly
recorded in the Clerk’s Office, Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia in Plat Book 7, Pages
62-63. The right of way petitioned to be vacated is more fully described as follows:
A portion of Omo Road within Ampthill Gardens Section 1
Subdivision, the location of which is more fully shown on a sketch
which is attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, by advertising; and,
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance of the right of way sought to be
vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the
aforesaid right of way be and is hereby vacated.
Page 324 of 399
\\JOB-CC-AZ-001\TempUpload\824c74d26f\stream/CHESTERFIELDCOVA/75f2ef6c87.docx/jls/ah/Omo Road
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.2-2272 of
the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the
sketch attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office,
Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.2-2274 is to destroy the force and effect
of the recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This Ordinance shall vest fee simple title to the
centerline of the right of way hereby vacated in the adjoining lot owners within Ampthill Gardens
Section 1 Subdivision free and clear of any rights of public use.
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names of the GRANTOR and
GRANTEES, or their successors in title.
Certified by:
DEPUTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
Page 325 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 17.E.
Subject:
To Consider Draft Rockwood Special Focus Area (Plan)
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the Rockwood Special Focus Area Plan
Summary of Information:
Moving Forward… The Comprehensive Plan for Chesterfield County identifies several specific area plans that
should be completed to provide additional detailed planning beyond the recommendations of the countywide
plan. The Board is requested to consider a new Plan for the area in the vicinity of Rockwood Park, including
replacement of portions of the current Northern Courthouse Road Community and Route 360 Corridor Plans
adopted in 2008 and 1995, respectively.
Staff, community stakeholders, and the elected/appointed Board/Planning Commissioners for the area have
been working to create this draft Plan amendment since March 2020. The draft plan was crafted upon extensive
community input and serves as a visioning document for the future of the Rockwood area.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the draft Plan at their regular meeting on Tuesday,
February 16, 2021.
Attachments:
1.18PJ0105 (Rockwood) Presentation
2.Rockwood Draft Plan for BOS
Preparer:Andrew Gillies, Director of Planning
Approved By:
Page 326 of 399
Rockwood Special Focus Area
Board of Supervisors Hearing –April 28, 2021
Page 327 of 399
Special Focus Area
A Special Focus Area (SFA)is a long-range plan providing detailed
development guidance to areas undergoing,or having a high potential for
change.
•County’s first Special Focus Area
•Guides future growth, land development
and redevelopment decisions,
programs, ordinances and policies
•Strategies for redevelopment of key
properties through detailed design
guidelines and placemaking
•Component of the countywide
Comprehensive Plan
•Replaces current Land Use Plans
(Northern Courthouse Road
Community Plan & Route 360
Corridor Plan)Page 328 of 399
Opportunities & Challenges
•Locational advantage
•Rockwood Park
•Established communities nearby
•Available land
•Attractive market
•Waterways
•Numerous landowners
•Predominant uses are commercial
•Few employment uses
•Low residential density
•Few entertainment uses/open spaces
•Few outdoor dining opportunities
•Automobile-oriented
•Disconnected from park
•Lacking a sense of “place”
•Retail vacancies
•Encumbered lands
Page 329 of 399
Land-Use Plan for Rockwood
•Multitude of uses
•Walkable development
•Higher density Core (Four Quadrants)
•Protections for existing residential
communities
•The Plan is a guide!
Page 330 of 399
Conceptual Redevelopment along U.S. 360 and Courthouse Road
Page 331 of 399
Infrastructure –vehicular, cycling & pedestrian
Page 332 of 399
Design Guidelines
Page 333 of 399
Recommendations & Implementation
•Expand Land Uses/Options
•Increased Vehicular, Pedestrian & and Cycling Connectivity
•Open Space/Build Upon Rockwood Park
•Design Standards and Placemaking
•County Initiated Rezoning Requests
•Special Design District/Zoning Overlay
•Incentives
•Aggregation Strategy
Page 334 of 399
Implementation -Funding Needs
•N/S Collector Road and new Rockwood Park access -High Priority!
•Crosswalks/pedestrian signals at multiple intersections
•Demolition Assistance for shopping centers
•Gateway signage
•Horner’s Run Trail segment in Southeast Quadrant
•Pedestrian bridge across Falling Creek/Gregory’s Pond to Rockwood Park
Page 335 of 399
Community Outreach & Hearings
Community Outreach
•Discussions with shopping center owners
•Notifications sent to 257 area property owners & community associations,
additional social media outreach
•Presentation and draft Plan document made available to the public on January
8, 2021 https://www.chesterfield.gov/5193/Rockwood-Special-Focus-Area
•Online comment portal open January 8, 2021 to February 1, 2021
•Community meeting on February 9, 2021 –included Q&A session
Hearings
•January 19 –Planning Commission work session
•February 16 -Planning Commission Recommended Approval
•March 10 –Board of Supervisors –set Public Hearing
•April 28 -Board of Supervisors –final vote
Page 336 of 399
Questions?
Page 337 of 399
Rockwood Special Focus Area
Draft April 2021
Page 338 of 399
2 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Table of Contents
Section 1: Introduction to Rockwood/Overview Page 3
Section 2: Existing Area Conditions Page 5
Section 3: Opportunities and Challenges Page 7
Section 4: Concept Plans Page 13
Section 5: Infrastructure Page 23
Section 6: Design Guide Page 26
Section 7: Implementation Page 37
Section 8: Appendix (not to be adopted) Page 41
Page 339 of 399
3 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Section 1: Introduction to Rockwood/Overview
Special Focus Area
In 2020, Chesterfield County initiated a Special
Focus Area (SFA) study for the Rockwood
community. A Special Focus Area is a long-range
plan providing detailed development guidance to
areas undergoing, or having a high potential for
change. The Special Focus Area serves as a guide
for future growth, land development and
redevelopment decisions, programs, ordinances
and policies; and relies more heavily on strategies
for the redevelopment of key properties through
detailed design guidelines and placemaking. This
Special Focus Area is a component of the
countywide Comprehensive Plan and replaces
portions of the current Land Use Plan
designations (Northern Courthouse Road
Community Plan & the Route 360 Corridor
Plan) within the focus area boundary
Plan Area
The area is bounded by Falling Creek to the north,
Gregory’s Pond, the Amberleigh and Falling Creek
Farms subdivisions to the east, Horner’s Run to
the south, and Price Club Blvd and the Genito
Woods subdivision to the west (see map on right).
A core area consisting of four quadrants
surrounding the intersection of Hull Street and
Courthouse Roads is designated as the main focal
point for redevelopment efforts within Rockwood.
Page 340 of 399
4 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Why Rockwood?
In 2017, the Planning Department recognized Rockwood as a “place” with
great potential. Rockwood is located at the intersection of two major
thoroughfares, Hull Street Road (U.S. Route 360) and Courthouse Road (State
Route 653) and is approximately 1.7 miles south of the Powhite Parkway (State
Route 76), of which Courthouse Road intersects. According to the Virginia
Department of Transportation’s 2019 Daily Traffic Volume Estimates,
approximately 77,000 vehicles traveled through Rockwood per day.
Rockwood has a relatively central location in the county and is situated within
a short distance from Chesterfield Towne Center, Midlothian, Chesterfield
County Airport, Chesterfield County Government Complex, CenterPointe,
Commonwealth Center, Stonebridge and Brandermill.
The area is anchored by the county’s first, largest, and most visited public park
(Rockwood Park), which attracted 586,000 visitors in 2019. Major commercial
centers such as Oxbridge Square, Rockwood Plaza, and Rockwood Square
occupy three of the four quadrants at the intersection of Hull Street and
Courthouse Roads. Due to a slowing retail market and current vacancies, these
ageing shopping centers have great potential for redevelopment, spurring
positive changes to the current development pattern in Rockwood.
With an advantageous location, proximity to established residential
neighborhoods and a regional amenity in Rockwood Park, county leaders view
Rockwood as a major activity hub with the potential for growth. This Special
Focus Area intends to promote Rockwood as a unique place to live, work and
play, and provides a vision for creating greater opportunities for citizens and
visitors of all ages and lifestyles through thoughtful development and
redevelopment.
Intersection of Hull Street and Courthouse Roads
Rockwood Nature Center at Rockwood Park
Page 341 of 399
5 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Section 2: Existing Area Conditions
Existing conditions in the Special Focus Area are summarized below and in the adjoining chart:
•Contains 673.2 acres of land area
•Numerous individually owned parcels (see largest area landowners in Appendix 1)
•Predominantly developed with commercial/retail uses
o Rockwood Square, Rockwood Plaza and Oxbridge Square Shopping Centers contain a
large percentage of such uses
•Minimal office, industrial/employment uses
•Minimal residential development
o Established residential communities lie just outside of the Special Focus Area boundaries
•Large proportion of vacant/undeveloped land
•Large proportion of public land (Rockwood Park)
•Environmentally sensitive/natural areas prevalent (see map in Appendix 2)
•Public facilities
o Rockwood Park
o Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad/Chesterfield Fire & EMS Company 24)
o County pump station
Existing Area Statistics
Total Acreage 673.2 acres
Square Miles 1.05
Parcels 168
Landowners 105
Residential Units 171 total units
31 single-family
132 multi-family
Commercial/Retail Uses
•426,484 total square feet
•Rockwood Plaza, Rockwood
Square and Oxbridge Square
Shopping Centers account for
50% of retail sq. ft. in SFA
Office Uses 58,913 square feet
Industrial Uses 15,000 square feet
Unimproved/Vacant Parcels 57 (197.9 acres/29.4% of Plan area)
Rockwood Park 161.3 acres/24% of Plan area
Area Within Resource
Protection Area (RPA) 122.4 acres/18.2% of Plan area
Land Value (all properties) $43,123,600 (44.7% of value)
Improvement Value (all
properties) $53,367,500 (55.3% of value)
Total Assessed Property Value
(all properties) $96,491,100
Land Value (not including
public and vacant lands) $28,418,100 (37.2% of value)
Improvement Value (not
including public and vacant
lands)
$48,012,400 (62.8% of value)
Total Assessed Property Value
(not including public and
vacant lands)
$76,430,500
Oxbridge Square Shopping Center
Page 342 of 399
6 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Core Area/Four Quadrants
Existing conditions within the Core Area are summarized by the map below. Additional information is provided in Appendix 3.
Core Area/Four Quadrants
Page 343 of 399
7 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Section 3: Opportunities and Challenges
Opportunities
Locational Advantage:
•Located at the junction of Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road
o One of the county’s most highly traversed intersections
•Easy access to residential, shopping, entertainment, recreational and employment areas such as Commonwealth Center, Chesterfield Towne
Center, Pocahontas State Park, and the Chesterfield County administration complex
•Nearby Powhite Parkway provides for travel to many of the region’s employment centers
Rockwood Park as a Regional Amenity:
•Serves as a focal point for the area and has a regional draw
•161.3 acres including 5.5 miles of walking trails, athletic fields/courts, playground, community gardens, arboretum, picnic shelters, archery range and
3,100-square-foot nature center
•Continued improvements are planned for Rockwood Park (see Parks and Recreation Master Plan)
Established Communities Adjacent to Plan Area:
•Amberleigh, Brandon, Chestnut Hills, Falling Creek Farms, Genito Woods, Loch Braemar, Mayfair Estates and Rockwood Terrace
•These communities remain stable and relatively affordable regarding the overall single-family market
Abundant Land for New Development and Redevelopment:
•Approximately 198 acres of land is vacant or undeveloped
•Predominantly located in the northwestern, eastern and southeastern sectors of the Plan area
•Considerable underutilized land which could be redeveloped with higher density uses
o Large acreage parcels containing single-family dwellings
o Shopping centers which have excess parking such as Rockwood Square and Oxbridge Square
Page 344 of 399
8 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Attractive Market for New Development
•Market analysis conducted by Department of Community Enhancement in 2019
•Demand for residential development of various types and densities, including townhomes and multi-family dwellings
•Some demand for retail uses including gas stations, general merchandise, restaurants, furniture stores and clothing stores
Waterways:
•Falling Creek, Gregory’s Pond and Horner’s Run provide natural borders along the north, east and south, respectively
•Multiple intermittent streams present throughout Plan area
•Serve as buffers between existing residential communities and new development
•Potential for future recreational and educational uses
Gregory’s Pond Viewed from Rockwood Park
Page 345 of 399
9 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Challenges
Land and Uses
➢Numerous landowners
o 105 individual owners
o Complicates aggregation of land for future
development/redevelopment
➢Predominant uses are commercial/retail
o Few office/industrial or other employment
uses
o Low residential density
▪Housing options are limited
•31 total single-family units
•One apartment
community containing
132 units
▪Area lacks critical mass to support
current and future non-residential
uses
➢Few entertainment uses or programmable open
spaces outside of Rockwood Park
➢Few outdoor dining opportunities
Additional Land Use Plan and Zoning maps are located in
Appendix 4.
Page 346 of 399
10 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
➢Automobile-oriented development pattern
o Area roadways designed to move motorized
vehicles, not pedestrians or cyclists
▪Courthouse Road and U.S. 360 contain 3 – 4
travel lanes plus turn lanes in each direction
•45-mph speed limits
•High traffic volumes
•34 curb cuts within 4,300 linear-foot
stretch of Route 360
•Poor access management/lack of
turn lanes for many entrances
o Parking areas dominate views from roadways
o Drive-through uses prevalent
o Few pedestrian/bicycle connections between
commercial areas, Rockwood Park and surrounding
residential communities
▪Few crosswalks or pedestrian-actuated
signals at roadway intersections
➢Lacking an overall sense of place
➢While much of the area is currently served by
public (county) water and wastewater services,
extension of water and wastewater lines and/or
upgrades to existing lines would be necessary to
serve higher density development in the area. A
detailed analysis of the current public water and
wastewater systems, as well as future needs, is
provided in Appendix 5.
Auto-Oriented Uses Along Hull Street Road (Route 360)
Surface Parking Area at Rockwood Square Shopping Center
Page 347 of 399
11 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Encumbered Lands
Multiple parcels within the Rockwood Special
Focus Area are encumbered by both physical
and man-made features which complicate
development and redevelopment opportunities.
These encumbrances include:
•Resource Protection Areas (RPA)
o Separation between existing
residential communities and the
Plan area hampers connectivity
o Evaluations will be required prior
to development to designate
fullest extent of wetlands and
RPA
•Major utility lines/easements
o Dominion Power transmission
lines
o Gas pipelines
•Chesterfield County water pump station
o Crucial to water provision for
many area citizens
o County committed to security
and screening of facility
▪Vegetated buffers and
clear zones required
around facility
Page 348 of 399
12 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
•Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad/Chesterfield Fire and EMS Company 24.
o One of the county’s busiest stations
o Facility to remain in service for the long-term
o Careful consideration should be made to improve ingress/egress to the
station as area properties develop or redevelop
•Gregory Cemetery
o Contains gravestones dated as early as 1877
o Preservation and enhancement of the site should be considered when
redevelopment occurs on surrounding properties
Power Transmission Lines
Manchester Volunteer Rescue Squad
Gregory Cemetery
Page 349 of 399
13 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Section 4: Concept Plans
Overall Land Use Plan
This Plan intends to provide for a multitude of
land uses in close proximity which would be
mutually beneficial and create an environment
for living, working and entertainment. The plan
also intends to promote housing, employment
and entertainment opportunities not currently
available in the Rockwood community. Careful
consideration has been made for future land
uses which would abut existing single-family
subdivisions such as Falling Creek Farms and
Genito Woods in order to minimize impacts on
these established residential communities.
Detailed explanations of the recommended
land uses contained in the adjoining map can
be found within Chapter 10 of the county
Comprehensive Plan. Specific guidelines for the
areas containing Land Use Plan Notes are
provided on the following page.
Page 350 of 399
14 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Land Use Plan Notes
Note 25: Within the area north of the proposed Paulbrook Drive extension, west of the Suncrest Drive extension and designated for Medium-High Density
Residential uses, a combination of various residential types, including small-lot (cluster) single-family dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, carriage houses and similar
residential products should be considered. Multi-family dwellings should be discouraged in this area. Designs should promote compatibility in order to mitigate
impacts on established neighborhoods.
Note 26: Within the areas north of the
proposed Paulbrook Drive extension and
west of Courthouse Road, Neighborhood
Nodes may be established where significant
residential development is planned, or
in areas where Corporate Office/Research
& Development/Light Industrial (CORDLI)
uses are located adjacent to significant
residential development. Neighborhood
Nodes should include small-scale commercial
development (Convenience Business (C-1) &
Neighborhood Office (O-1) uses) fronting a
main street or green space. Buildings may
contain residential units above first-floor
commercial uses. Neighborhood nodes
should be integrated into surrounding
development by pedestrian/bike corridors or
greenspaces. Design of Neighborhood Nodes
should consider reduced setbacks with
buildings fronting streets, parking areas
located behind buildings, on-street parking,
streetscaping, outdoor cafes and other uses
that activate the streetscape. Building design
should employ residential architectural
features.
Note 27: Within the area abutting Courthouse Road to the east and Falling Creek to the north, Neighborhood Office (O-1) uses may be appropriate as a transition
between Courthouse Road and future residential development in the northwestern corner of the Plan area.
Neighborhood Node
Page 351 of 399
15 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Core Area Concept Plan
Land uses within the four quadrants of the intersection of Hull Street and Courthouse Roads would follow the development pattern illustrated in the adjoining
figure. This master plan suggests that a mix of commercial and higher-density residential uses be located predominantly along Hull Street and Courthouse Roads,
and along an envisioned north/south interior
street creating a “main street” district. Such
district could also take form as a linear greenspace
or pedestrian corridor flanked by retail uses.
Additional opportunities for retail spaces at street
corners internal to projects are encouraged where
higher-density residential uses are present.
Land outside of the mixed-use areas would
include higher-density residential uses including
multi-family, townhomes/rowhomes and other
similar attached and semi-detached dwelling unit
categories with adequate transition or buffers
from existing single-family subdivisions. Carriage
houses/detached accessory dwelling units are
also supported as an additional unique housing
option. It is anticipated that higher-density,
pedestrian-oriented residential uses will make up
a larger proportion of new development and
redevelopment within the Core Area as compared
to the auto-focused, retail-heavy pattern of today.
Conservation, recreation and public lands are
included in the master plan for the Core Area.
These areas include designated resource
protection areas (RPA) along Horner’s Run
(southern border of Plan area), Gregory Cemetery
in the Northwest Quadrant, as well as the county
pump station and areas recommended for
future expansion of Rockwood Park (Northeast
Quadrant).
Page 352 of 399
16 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Higher densities and building heights should be encouraged closest to the intersection of Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road. As distance from the intersection
increases, densities and building heights decrease in order to promote compatibility with existing single-family development outside of the Special Focus Area
boundaries. Flexibility should be considered for projects abutting Rockwood Park, Horner’s Run, or existing non -residential development as these areas provide
additional buffering between potential new development and established neighborhoods. While small-lot single-family and townhome-style units could be offered
within larger projects in the Four Quadrants/Core area, these unit styles would typically be developed, or already exist outside of the core area.
Page 353 of 399
17 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Open Spaces/Plazas:
Public open spaces such as plazas are recommended to be included in new commercial, high-density residential and mixed-use development projects within the
Core Area. These areas should contain any combination of furniture, pedestrian-scale lighting, fountains, splash pads, games, outdoor dining areas,
sculptures/public art, and landscaping. Open spaces may also include lawn or turf surfaces which encourage children’s play and games. Public open spaces should
also be easily programmable in order to accommodate seasonal events such as farmers’ markets, movies, concerts and other events. All public open spaces should
be well-connected to surrounding development by pedestrian infrastructure. Additional considerations should be made for restaurants and usable open spaces
on the rooftops of buildings.
Programmable Open Space Events Stage
Page 354 of 399
18 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Market:
In addition to typical public open spaces, a market could attract visitors to the Rockwood area. This concept could include farmers’ markets, special events, a food
hall or combination of similar uses. A market would cater to a multitude of vendors while providing for better access to healthy foods and local products. Both
interior and exterior spaces could be utilized.
Market Pavilion Outdoor Farmers’ Market
Page 355 of 399
19 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Pedestrian Corridors:
Sidewalks, trails and other pedestrian routes are vital to creating a highly walkable environment which connects different uses, parking areas, open spaces, and
roads. Pedestrian corridors are encouraged between building complexes and along streets containing multiple commercial uses in order to accommodate higher
volumes of foot traffic. Where buildings containing substantial length would present barriers to pedestrian connectivity, ped estrian pass-throughs should be
considered.
Additional opportunities for pedestrian connectivity may be considered along an existing stream which extends through the Core Area (Northwest, Southwest and
Southeast Quadrants) and flows into Horner’s Run. As adjacent properties redevelop, portions of this stream may be restored to a natural state and could include
parallel trails and educational opportunities. A more urban transformation may be considered for the creation of a landscaped pedestrian corridor lined with
public open spaces, buildings and outdoor cafes.
Potential Pedestrian Corridor along Stream (Creek Walk) Existing Channelized Stream
Page 356 of 399
20 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Redevelopment Scenario
This section provides an incremental conceptual model for the full buildout of
the Rockwood Core Area throughout a 50-year period. This concept imagines
larger parcels being redeveloped in the shorter term while smaller outparcels
are aggregated over a longer time period for redevelopment.
The properties currently occupied by the Rockwood Square Shopping Center
and the Rockwood Golf Park (driving range) are likely candidates for a first
phase of redevelopment in the Core Area. These properties contain significant
acreage and have good access to Hull Street and Courthouse Roads. It is
anticipated that outparcels along Route 360 will not be redeveloped in the
short-term as these properties have frontage and good visibility along this
major thoroughfare. These outparcels are currently occupied by fast-food, gas
stations and other successful businesses thus the pressure for redevelopment
is not urgent at this time.
In order to promote a successful buildout scenario, properties which are first in
line to be redeveloped must be designed in a manner which will allow for a
successful first-phase project, and also accommodate future expansion by
integrating existing outparcels in a compatible and mutually advantageous way.
It is intended that high-quality development projects on the interiors of larger
sites would elevate land values over time encouraging outparcels to redevelop for higher density uses. The foll owing recommendations should be considered in
order to provide for successful redevelopment of the Core Area:
•Development of higher density and higher quality projects on the interior of quadrants which elevate values of adjacent outparcels, increasing the potential
for their future redevelopment
•Site designs that utilize “dimensional accounting” in order to anticipate adequate lot depth and site area needed to accommodate future projects along
roads such as Route 360 or Courthouse Road. Future redevelopment potential of outparcels should not be limited by interior projects
•Use of temporary buffers between redevelopment projects and existing outparcels to preserve future buildable areas of outparc els as described above.
Buffers would be implemented through zoning conditions or Ordinance provisions but would be voided once outparcels redevelop. Buffer areas could
also be used in the interim as usable open spaces
•Stub roads which can serve existing development and provide for future connections when adjacent parcels redevelop
•Development of new open spaces and utilizing existing environmental features as assets
Phase 1: Redevelopment of Rockwood Plaza and Driving Range
Page 357 of 399
21 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
The diagrams below provide a highly conceptual buildout scenario for the development of higher density, mixed uses over a 50-year period.
Page 358 of 399
22 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
The renderings below show higher density redevelopment as envisioned by the conceptual buildout scenario.
Future Development along Hull Street Road
Existing Development along Hull Street Road
Existing Development at Corner of Hull Street and Courthouse Roads
Future Development at Corner of Hull Street and Courthouse Roads
Page 359 of 399
23 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Section 5: Infrastructure
Roadways
The Special Focus Area recommends the creation of a grid system of interconnected roads as provided for on the Proposed Road Network map below. The planned
roadway network provides a framework for recommended land uses and promotes orde rly development of land in the Plan area. Several of the roads proposed
with this Plan would take advantage of connectivity to existing signalized intersections along Route 360 and Courthouse Road, providing efficient access to new
development/redevelopment and more adequate dispersal of traffic generated from such activities. Furthermore, minimal changes would be made to the e xisting
County Thoroughfare Plan. Detailed descriptions of these proposed roadways are included in Appendix 6.
Roads within the overall Plan Area should include the basic elements
provided below:
• Sidewalks on both sides of streets
o Separate shared-use path or on-street bike lanes where
recommended by the Bikeways & Trails map and as
detailed in Appendix 7. Flexibility should be considered
in order to promote compatibility of exact facility
treatments with particular land uses and densities of
such uses
• Pedestrian-scale streetlights/lamps
• Buffered areas or “tree lawns” between travel lanes/edge of
curb and sidewalks or shared-use paths
• Street trees within tree lawns
Mass Transit
Although the Rockwood community is not currently served by public
transit, the Greater Richmond Transit Company (GRTC) envisions future
bus routes along Hull Street Road between Woodlake and Downtown
Richmond. New development along Route 360 should consider
accommodations for future transit stations and related infrastructure
such as the provision of additional right-of-way dedications for bus pull-
offs and areas for covered stations/bus shelters.
Page 360 of 399
24 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Bikeways & Trails
Bikeways Generally
Bikeways and trails promote a healthy
lifestyle and provide alternative
transportation linkages between
homes, jobs, services, recreation and
entertainment for area residents.
Bikeways and trails are also a vital
component of redevelopment efforts
and community building in the area.
This section provides a long-term
guide for the development of trails
which would provide connections
between Rockwood and the
surrounding communities, and to the
countywide Bikeways & Trails system.
Detailed explanations of the
proposed bikeway routes depicted on
the adjoining map are provided in
Appendix 7.
Page 361 of 399
25 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Horner’s Run Greenway
The Horner’s Run stream makes up the southern boundary of much of the special focus area including the southeast and southwes t quadrants of the core. While
areas of the waterway have collected trash and debris, portions of the stream include naturalized channels and densely wooded areas which provide for scenic
beauty. The Special Focus Area recommends the establishment of Horner’s Run as a
greenway, with paved and/or unpaved trails within easements granted to the Parks and
Recreation Department. A greenway and trail system would better connect nearby
residential communities to the core of Rockwood. In addition, with increased public
access and perpetual county maintenance, Horner’s Run would become a major asset
for residents and visitors in and around the Plan area.
Southwest Quadrant: Along existing gas and/or sewer easements or along the southern
edge of any redevelopment of the Rockwood Square Shopping Center. If a trail is not
viable in close proximity to the stream, on-street bike lanes should be installed along a
new east/west local street to be constructed with any redevelopment of Rockwood
Square.
Future trail routes to the west towards Genito Road should be considered in order to aid
future redevelopment efforts and facilitate greater connectivity with Horner’s Run and
surrounding development.
Southeast Quadrant: Along the south side of Horner’s Run within sewer easements and
the current VDOT stormwater facility along Courthouse Road, or along south side of new
development/redevelopment of Oxbridge Square Shopping Center. Trails on both sides
of Horner’s Run would be incredibly desirable in this location.
Future trail extensions should be considered to the southeast along or near Horner’s Run to promote connectivity to nea rby development (Falling Creek Farms).
Alternative routing may be considered in the southeastern corner of the Plan area by utilizing Oxbridge Place, the powerline easement or within new development
in this area.
Rockwood Park/Loch Braemar Connector
The Parks and Recreation Department has considered a future trail connection across Gregory’s Pond or Falling Creek to connect the residential communities of
Loch Braemar, Loch Haven and Bexley to Rockwood Park. This trail (approximately 0.27-mile) would provide direct pedestrian and cycling access to the park, which
is only accessible today by automobile (an approximately three-mile trip). Any proposal for a crossing should include engagement of surrounding communities
and the owners of Gregory’s Pond, including the Broad Rock Fishing Club.
Horner’s Run near Oxbridge Road
Page 362 of 399
26 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Section 6: Design Guide
Streetscape Design
Streets in the Core Area are crucial to
shaping the built environment and
creating a sense of place. New streets
should be designed to move motor
vehicles while also providing a safe
and comfortable environment for
pedestrians and cyclists. Existing
streets should be enhanced with
wider sidewalks buffered from travel
lanes, as well as streetlamps, street
trees/landscaping. Roads within the
Four Quadrants/Core Area should
consider the design features depicted
in the adjoining graphic.
• Treatment should be based
on land uses and densities
of such uses (residential,
commercial and mixed-use) –
see additional details in
Appendix 6
Page 363 of 399
27 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
The photographs below depict desired design elements for new development projects when abutting existing major arterials such as Route 360 and Courthouse
Road.
Page 364 of 399
28 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
The photographs below depict desired design elements for interior streets within new development projects.
Commercial/Mixed-Use Streetscape High-Density Residential Streetscape
Low-Density Residential Streetscape
Page 365 of 399
29 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Site and Building Design Standards
Street Setbacks:
The special focus area anticipates a more compact, urban development pattern with higher
densities and taller buildings than the sprawling low-density form in Rockwood today. With this
new development pattern, buildings and their relationships to streets should be reexamined. It
is recommended that setbacks for buildings be permitted closer to roads, and that
streetscaping, landscaped areas and street trees shape the setback areas using a more form-
based approach. A hierarchy of setbacks is recommended in order to create better relationships
between uses and streets, and to promote pedestrian activity.
A summary of suggested setback treatments is provided below.
• Setbacks should vary based on uses and street types
o Residential vs non-residential or mixed-use
o Major Thoroughfares such as Route 360 and Courthouse Road vs interior
streets
• Setbacks based on widths necessary for desired streetscaping and landscaped areas
• Maximum setbacks from streets should be considered
• Parking areas and drives should be located behind buildings, not adjacent to streets
o Alternative setbacks and landscaping should be evaluated for areas where
placing parking behind buildings cannot be accomplished
• Right-of-way should be dedicated or vacated in order to create consistent setbacks
along roads
• Allowances for projections such as porches, balconies, terraces, cantilevered bays,
awnings, canopies and similar structures
• Some administrative flexibility is recommended to achieve these goals
Additional setback concepts are provided in Appendix 8.
Page 366 of 399
30 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Building Design:
With redevelopment in the Core Area, new buildings with greater length and height are
anticipated. New buildings are also proposed to be located closer to streets and along open
spaces creating greater visibility. With this built environment in mind, high-quality design and
materials will be vital to creating value and a sense of place. The following elements provide
for a high-quality and long-lasting built environment.
•High quality exterior materials such a brick, stone, masonry, glass, standing seem
metal and cementitious siding (HardiePlank and similar products) should be utilized
•Materials listed above should be applied on all sides of buildings to avoid inferior
façade treatments
•Variations of materials, articulation of doors and windows, sculptural or textural
relief of facades, architectural ornamentation, cornice treatment, varied roof lines,
or other appurtenances such as decorative lighting fixtures
•Projections such as eaves/overhangs, porches, balconies, terraces, cantilevered bays,
awnings, canopies, lighting fixtures, signage and similar structures are encouraged to
enhance aesthetic character
•Varying setbacks, step backs and pedestrian pass-throughs to break up facades
•For buildings located at the intersection or two or more roads
o Buildings should wrap around corners to create
highly visible building frontages
▪Tower features or other focal features
should be incorporated into buildings facing
corners
o Where buildings do not wrap around a corner or
projects consisting of two separate buildings, a plaza
or public open space should be provided at the
corner
•Usable entrances along street frontages
•Storefront windows along street frontages for
commercial/mixed-use buildings
High-Quality Design Features/Corner Treatment
Public Open Spaces to Provide Visual Interest at Corners
Page 367 of 399
31 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
• Flexible first-floor spaces in areas where mixed-use buildings are
desired. These spaces should be constructed with adequate ceiling
heights and meet code provisions in order to allow easy conversion
from residential to non-residential uses in response to changes in the
market environment
• Accommodations for outdoor dining areas adjacent to pedestrian
corridors or public open spaces
• Parking structures/garages concealed by architectural design or
building massing
• Drive-throughs/vehicle stacking areas placed behind buildings in
order to conceal these uses from visibility along major thoroughfares
Pedestrian Pass-Through Connecting Uses to Parking Areas
Fast-Food Drive Through Hidden Behind Building
Page 368 of 399
32 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Open Spaces:
Open spaces (public and private) create an interesting and high-quality built environment. New
development within the Four Quadrants should provide for ample open spaces with a wide range
of uses. Spaces should provide for areas which can be easily programmable in order to
accommodate seasonal events such as farmers’ markets, movies, concerts and other events. All
public open spaces should be well-connected to surrounding development by pedestrian
infrastructure. Open spaces can be developed in the form of public plazas adjacent to buildings,
greenways along waterways or linear parks through a project, village greens or squares in the center
of developments, pocket parks distributed throughout larger development projects, and around
stormwater ponds. Open spaces should provide, but not be limited to:
•Hardscaped and landscaped areas
•Outdoor furniture
•Information kiosks
•Pedestrian-scale lighting
•Water features
•Outdoor dining areas
•Sculptures/public art
•Gazebos/Pergolas
•Playgrounds/recreational uses
•Community gardens
Mixed-Use Development Focused on a Village Green
Public Plaza Private Community Amenities
Page 369 of 399
33 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Landscaping:
Landscaped areas are crucial to creating visual appeal while providing
environmental advantages for developments. Landscaping should be provided
along streets, parking areas, open spaces and pedestrian corridors.
A combination of the items below are recommended for landscaping within new
developments.
Along Streets and Within Medians
• Street trees consisting of medium-large deciduous trees on the sides of
streets between travel lanes and sidewalks/shared-use paths, and within
medians
• Low-level shrubs between trees, at corners and at ends of median
strips/landscape islands, and adjacent to pedestrian crossings
• Small ground covering shrubs/grass for weed prevention and erosion
control
• Pedestrian-scale lights/lamp posts
Within Parking Areas
• Medium-large deciduous trees within landscape islands
• Low-level shrubs located between trees
• Small ground covering shrubs/grass for weed prevention and erosion control
• Pedestrian-scale lights/lamp posts
Between Parking Areas and Streets
• Low-level evergreen shrubs or hedgerows which reach adequate height to shield
headlights
• Low-level brick or masonry walls with adequate height to shield headlights
• Brick/masonry columns with wrought iron or similar fencing between columns
• Additional small shrubs along walls, between trees and along driveway entrances
Landscaping between Parking Areas and Streets
Landscaped Streets and Median Areas
Page 370 of 399
34 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Public Open Spaces/Pedestrian Corridors
•Combination of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs along hardscaped areas and in landscape beds and raised planters
•Hardscaping consisting of bricks, pavers or similar surfaces with varying textures, colors and patterns
•Sitting walls incorporated into planter boxes
•Pedestrian-scale lights/lamp posts
•Water features
Landscaping in Pedestrian Corridor
Landscaping in Plaza/Public Open Space
Page 371 of 399
35 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Stormwater Systems:
Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) are necessary infrastructure for storing and/or
treating stormwater runoff from the built environment before it reaches the natural environment
via waterways. Additional drainage requirements may apply to properties that abut existing
residential lots in order to divert runoff to adequate receiving channels and not onto existing lots.
With higher-density development anticipated in the Plan Area, stormwater infrastructure will be
more likely to be constructed sub-surface. While underground stormwater infrastructure can be
relatively expensive, additional opportunities may be available when above-ground systems are
developed. The following is a list of feasible stormwater options.
•Wet ponds which continuously retain water
•Dry ponds which provide temporary stormwater storage during rain events
•Underground basins below parking areas, landscaped areas and sidewalks
•Low-impact design opportunities
o Tree wells/planter boxes on streetscapes
o Bioretention swales/rain gardens in landscaped areas or medians
o Green rooftops
o Permeable pavement such as “grasscrete” and similar surfaces
Stormwater systems are encouraged to be designed in an aesthetic manner and should
be utilized as amenities wherever possible. Such systems can be incorporated into
green spaces containing paths, fountains and similar water features, hardscaped areas,
decks/bridges, gardens and structures such as gazebos or pergolas. Wet ponds can be
used to provide scenery for abutting buildings and outdoor seating areas for restaurants
which may be located alongside or on decks constructed above. Stormwater features
designed as amenities add considerable value to new developments while providing for
treatment of stormwater quantity and quality.
Stormwater Pond as an Amenity
Bioretention Swale in Median
Page 372 of 399
36 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Creating a Sense of “Place”:
New development should be memorable and entice visitors to return by offering an overall environment that
is welcoming while serving multiple needs. The creation of a sense of “place” is necessary in order to
accomplish these goals. Besides employing effective site and building design, a sense of “place” can be
promoted through branding, signage and wayfinding.
Branding
•Creation of a “brand” or a place name that is used consistently throughout a project or area in order
to advertise the place
•Branding can be displayed graphically on signage, public art/murals, banners and flags, address markers
and other visible locations throughout a place
Gateway Signage
•Signs located along major thoroughfares and/or at major entry points into a place
•Include the development or community brand/name
•Informs visitors that they have entered a distinct and unique place
Wayfinding
•Located along streets, parking areas,
pedestrian corridors and open spaces
•Provides directions to locations
of interest within a development
or unique area
•Can provide directions to roads, transit
stations or other points of interest
outside
the development
•Can include maps, signs and pavement
markings to direct visitors
•Should always emphasize the “brand”
or “place” name
Branding on Murals and Banners
Wayfinding Signs Conceptual Gateway Sign at Entrance to Rockwood
Page 373 of 399
37 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Section 7: Implementation
County-Initiated Rezoning Requests
Prior to the adoption of new Zoning Ordinance provisions for the Special Focus Area, rezoning applications for redevelopment projects proposed within the Four
Quadrants which aggregate multiple parcels and contain a mix of commercial and residential uses or encompass either of the three shopping centers (Oxbridge
Square, Rockwood Plaza or Rockwood Square) could be initiated by Chesterfield County. County-initiated rezoning cases have the following advantages:
•No application fees charged
•Support from Staff, Planning Commission and/or Board of Supervisors
•Additional case management/ownership role assumed by county
Zoning Ordinance Amendments
Zoning ordinances should be established in order to implement the specific design recommendations for development in the Rock wood Special Focus Area. New
Ordinances could be created in the form of a Special Design District similar to those utilized in the Northern Jefferson Davis and Midlothian Community Special
Area Plans. An additional option could be establishment of an overlay zoning district in which additional uses would be permitted on top of existing commercial
zoning districts, requiring higher-quality design standards in return for expanded uses. Future Ordinances should permit higher-densities and building heights,
more flexibility in uses, and reductions in lot sizes, setbacks and parking requirements within the Core Area.
Incentives
Incentives provide greater opportunities for development or redevelopment of real property by lowering project costs and reli eving some regulatory burdens.
The following incentives are recommended to encourage redevelopment activities within the Core Area.
•Chesterfield County offers a rehabilitation tax exemption program for the rehabilitation, renovation or replacement of older residential, commercial and
industrial structures. It is recommended that the county evaluate additional tax abatements/performance grants to support redevelopment efforts.
•Deletion of cash proffers for higher-density residential development within the Four Quadrants/Core Area
•Demolition assistance for the three major shopping centers. Current demolition figures for a typical shopping center structure are estimated to be $6 - $8
per square foot. The following provides estimates for demolition of the three shopping center structures (figures do not include pavement removal).
o Rockwood Square Shopping Center (53,780 square feet) = approximately $430,000
o Oxbridge Square Shopping Center (126,973 square feet) = approximately $1,015,784
o Rockwood Plaza Shopping Center (43,157 square feet) = approximately $345,254
Page 374 of 399
38 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Aggregation Strategy
The aggregation of smaller parcels is necessary for achieving the development pattern envisioned by this Plan. The Planning, Economic Development and
Community Enhancement Departments work collaboratively with developers and landowners in the planning stages of a project, as well as during the zoning and
site plan processes in order to assemble parcels. It is also recommended that additional financial incentives be explored for development/redevelopment projects
which aggregate parcels of significant acreage.
Funding Needs
Increased development in the Plan area would generate needs related to infrastructure and other improvements. Many of these needs would be provided through
private development activity, however additional projects have been identified by this Plan which would require public funding. These potential public projects
and their estimated costs are listed below.
Amberdale Drive, North/South Segment: (High Priority)
•Specific details provided in Appendix 6.
•The current estimated cost for this facility is $1.8 million.
New Rockwood Park Access Road (High Priority)
•This project should be packaged with the aforementioned north/south segment of Amberdale Drive to provide full access to Rockwood Park from Hull
Street Road.
•The current estimated cost for this facility is $300,000.
Crosswalks and Pedestrian Signals
•Recommended at the following intersections
o Along Route 360 at existing Price Club Boulevard/Suncrest Drive signal, existing Rockwood Square Shopping Center signal, and existing Oxbridge
Road signal (proposed Rockwood Park Access)
o Along Courthouse Road at proposed Suncrest Drive extension, existing Tabor Lane signal (current Rockwood Park entrance), and existing signalized
entrance to Rockwood Square and Oxbridge Square Shopping Centers
•Potential crosswalk locations should be evaluated at the time of development at or in the vicinity of these intersections
•The current estimated cost for these facilities is $600,000 total (estimated $100,000 per crossing)
•Some facilities may be provided by developers
Page 375 of 399
39 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Horner’s Run Trail Segment in Southeast Quadrant of Core Area
•This trail would be installed along the south side of Horner’s Run following an existing county sewer easement and occupying a portion of VDOT’s
stormwater management property along Courthouse Road.
•8-foot wide asphalt trail extending approximately 845 linear feet
•This project is recommended for public funding due to the fact that a majority of the trail would traverse private property which is not currently controlled
by the adjacent Oxbridge Square Shopping Center, therefore it is not likely to be part y to future redevelopment activities in the Southeast Quadrant. The
Department of Parks and Recreation recommends that timing of this project coincide with nearby redevelopment activities.
•The current estimated cost for this facility is between $750,000 - $850,000
Gateway Signage (four signs located along Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road)
•Recommended to be located at four (4) locations generally where Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road enter the Special Focus Area
•The current estimated cost for these signs is at minimum $80,000 (minimum $20,000 per sign)
Page 376 of 399
40 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Category General Steps Department Lead
County-Initiated
Rezoning Requests
County-Initiated Rezoning Requests. Redevelopment projects proposed within the Four
Quadrants which aggregate multiple parcels and contain a mix of commercial and residential
uses or encompass either of the three shopping centers in the Core Area (Oxbridge Square,
Rockwood Plaza or Rockwood Square) would be initiated by Chesterfield County.
Planning
Ordinances
Design Standards. Adopt new design standards that will guide future growth and
development as identified in this plan. This may be in the form of a Special Design District or
Zoning Overlay.
Planning
Infrastructure
Amberdale Drive (North/South Segment) and Rockwood Park Access Road. Seek and secure
funding to construct the recommended road and new park entrance.
Planning &
Parks and Recreation
Crosswalks and Pedestrian Signals. Seek and secure funding for crosswalks at multiple
intersections along Hull Street and Courthouse Roads. Planning
Horner's Run Trail. Seek and secure funds to develop a segment of the Horner's Run Trail
located in the Southwest Quadrant from Courthouse Road to Oxbridge Road. Parks and Recreation
Rockwood Park/Loch Braemar Connector. Conduct study, with input from community, for a
trail connection between Rockwood Park and Loch Braemar. Parks and Recreation
Other
Gateway Signage. Seek and secure funds to install gateway signs along Hull Street and
Courthouse Roads near the entrances to the Rockwood Special Focus Area. Community Enhancement
Incentives: Expand existing incentive programs, eliminate cash proffers and provide
demolition assistance for redevelopment projects within the Four Quadrants/Core Area.
Economic Development &
Community Enhancement
Aggregation Strategy. Collaborate with the Community Enhancement and Economic
Development Departments and developers to acquire significant acreages for development
and seek additional incentives for projects which aggregate significant acreage.
Planning
Page 377 of 399
41 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Section 8: Appendix (not to be adopted)
Appendix 1: Largest Area Landowners
Largest Area Landowners
161.3 acres Chesterfield County (Rockwood Park)
87.3 acres Lunsford Wavel J Trustee
31.3 acres Central Virginia Bank
24.7 acres Furman Bernard C Sr Trustee
18.9 acres Amberleigh LLC
13.8 acres Calvary Baptist Church (Northwest Quadrant, portion of)
12.9 acres P G & M C LLC (Southwest Quadrant, Rockwood Square)
12.8 acres BRG Rockwood LLC
12.1 acres Mosaic Oxbridge Owner LLC (Southeast Quadrant, Oxbridge Square)
11.9 acres Lee Si G & Mi A (Southwest Quadrant, Driving Range)
10.9 acres Clover Hill Baptist Church
10.0 acres Hawthorne Family
10.0 acres Hull Nathaniel D & Kelley M
9.7 acres Hull David Milton
9.6 acres Hubbard Charles J & Frances B
8.4 acres Speeks W Gerald & Posey J S
8.2 acres Union 10000 Hull Street LLC (Northeast Quadrant)
8 acres Horner & Savage (Southeast Quadrant, portion of)
7.8 acres Mountain Movers Ministry
7.0 acres Adams David W
5.6 acres Hughes Family
5.6 acres Adams Ralph L Jr & Andrea B
5.5 acres 360 Motel INC (Northwest Quadrant, 360 Motel)
5.5 acres Adams Opal R
5.4 acres Commonwealth of Virginia
5.4 acres Ladino 9736 LLC
5.2 acres Union Rockwood LLC (Northeast Quadrant, Rockwood Plaza)
5.0 acres Manchester Vol Rescue Squad (Northwest Quadrant)
5.0 acres Myers Robert E & Reva M
Page 378 of 399
42 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Appendix 2: Existing Natural Features
Page 379 of 399
43 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Appendix 3: Core Area/Four Quadrants Current Conditions
Northeast Quadrant (22.7 acres):
•Six (6) parcels containing 55,405 total square feet of retail space
o 38,954 square feet in Rockwood Plaza Shopping Center
o 16,451 square feet in outparcels
o Two (2) single-family homes were recently demolished. Both lots (1.3 total acres) are currently vacant/available for new development.
Northwest Quadrant (39.3 acres):
•44 parcels containing 101,548 total square feet of retail/office space
o 82,814 square feet of retail
▪5,215 square feet currently under development (former Dollar General – future Tommy’s Car Wash) at corner of Hull Street and
Courthouse Roads
o 18,734 square feet of office predominantly within the Rockwood Green Office Development
Southeast Quadrant (22.4 acres):
•Seven (7) parcels containing 138,696 total square feet of retail space
o 116,230 square feet in Oxbridge Square Shopping Center
o 22,466 square feet in outparcels
Southwest Quadrant (42.8 total acres):
•24 parcels containing 149,569 total square feet of commercial/retail uses
o 57,780 square feet in Rockwood Square Shopping Center
o 95,789 square feet in outparcels
o 2,500 square feet currently under development (former Pizza Hut - future Starbucks Coffee) is currently under development)
Page 380 of 399
44 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Appendix 4: Current Land Use Plan and Zoning Maps
Page 381 of 399
45 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Page 382 of 399
46 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Appendix 5: Public Water and Wastewater Systems Analysis
Page 383 of 399
47 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Public Water:
The overall plan area is served by a 24” transmission line along Hull Street Road and a 20” transmission line along Courthouse Road, north of Hull Street Road.
These lines feed 6”, 8” and 12” water lines which serve the existing Amberleigh commercial a nd residential development, the Rockwood Park apartments, and
commercial/retail development in all four quadrants of the intersection of Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road. The adequac y of these existing lines will have
to be evaluated based on redevelopment proposals for higher density uses, which may necessitate upgrading to larger lines to support greater domestic and fire
flow demands.
For undeveloped areas east of the Oxbridge Square shopping center and within the northwest quadrant of Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road, extensions of
existing water lines, as well as new lines sized for specific development proposals, will be necessary, and are anticipated t o be constructed by developers. These
would include water line extensions of approximately 3,200 feet along the future Paulbrook Drive Extended to Courthouse Road, of approximately 3,300 feet along
the future Suncrest Drive Extended out to Courthouse Road, of approximately 1,400 feet along Tabor Lane extended, and approximately 1,100 feet along
Courthouse Road.
The County’s Rockwood Water Pumping Station and Hull Street Road Flow Control Valve are located adjacent to east of the Rockw ood Plaza shopping center, on
County owned property which is a part of Rockwood Park. Redevelopment of the Rockwood Plaza site, as well as new development to the east must provide
sufficient buffers and development setbacks to allow access to those facilities for operational purposes, as well as fencing and screening landscaping for security.
Public Wastewater:
The overall plan area is served by the 48” Falling Creek trunk sewer along the northern boundary, a 12” line along the south shore of Gregory’s Pond, and by the
15” Horner’s Run trunk sewer along the southern boundary. These lines support a network of prima rily 8” wastewater lines which serve the existing Amberleigh
commercial and residential development, the Rockwood Park apartments, and commercial/retail development at all four quadrants of the Hull Street Road and
Courthouse Road intersection. The adequacy of these existing lines will have to be evaluated based on redevelopment proposals for higher density uses, which
may necessitate upgrading to larger lines to support increased wastewater flows.
For undeveloped areas east of the Oxbridge Square shopping center and within the northeast quadrant of Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road, extensions of
existing wastewater lines, as well as new lines sized for specific development proposals, will be necessary. An extension of approximately 1,800 feet of an existing
wastewater line within the Amberleigh development will be necessary for redevelopment of the Rockwood Plaza shopping center, as it will allow for abandonment
of a private wastewater pump station which currently serves that site.
Substantial wastewater line extensions from the 48” Falling Creek trunk sewer, sized for specific development proposals, will be necessary for new developme nt
within the northwest quadrant of Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road and are anticipated to be constructed by developers. A new wastewater line extension
of approximately 3,600 feet crossing the future Suncrest Drive Extended to the future Tabor Lane Extended would serve development north of the Rockwood Park
Apartments. An additional new extension of approximately 3,100 feet west of Suncrest Drive Extended, to follow that road extension, would serve development
around the Suncrest Drive Extended and future Paulbrook Drive Extended area.
Page 384 of 399
48 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Appendix 6: Specific Roadway Recommendations
(Notes A – J correspond to the descriptions on pages 49 & 50)
Page 385 of 399
49 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Thoroughfare Roads (County Thoroughfare Plan):
Amberdale Drive – Collector (minimum 60-foot wide right-of-way) and Rockwood Park access:
•Road would provide full access to Rockwood Park as well as serve future development in the Northeast Quadrant and any future westward expansion of
the Amberleigh development
•To be designated as a Special Access Street
•Portions may include on-street parking
•North/South segment (Route 360 to Rockwood Park access - See Note A) to provide “parkway” design with potential 100-foot right-of-way
o Center median containing landscaping
o Sidewalks on both sides of roadway
▪Potential sidewalk on one side may be
shared-use path (see Appendix 7)
o Street trees on both sides of road located
between road and sidewalk
•Turn lane and signal modifications/improvements would
be necessary along Hull Street Road
•New Rockwood Park access road (See Note B)
o This roadway would extend approximately 200
feet from the northern terminus of the
North/South segment (See Note A) to the existing
Rockwood Park access road.
o May be a public or private street/drive
o Sidewalks on both sides of roadway
▪Potential sidewalk on one side may be
shared-use path (see Appendix 7)
Oxbridge Place – Collector (minimum 60-foot wide right-of-way)
Paulbrook Drive – Collector (minimum 70-foot wide right-of-way)
Page 386 of 399
50 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Price Club Boulevard – Collector (minimum 70-foot wide right-of-way)
•Section approaching intersection with Route 360 would include a shared-use path
•South of the intersection approach area near Route 360, recommend a street diet to provide two travel lanes with buffered bike lanes extending west to
terminus at Genito Road (subject to VDOT approval of a traffic study provided by county or others)
Suncrest Drive - Collector (minimum 70-foot wide right-of-way)
•“Parkway” design with landscaped center median between Paulbrook Drive and Courthouse Road
•Sidewalks on both sides of roadway
o Potential sidewalk on one side may be shared-use path (see Appendix 7)
o On-street bike lanes may be considered in lieu of a shared-use path
•May include on-street parking
Local Streets (see Notes C - E)
The purpose of this class of roadway is to create a grid system of interconnected streets to foster connectivity of uses, better distribution of vehicular traffic and
increased pedestrian and cycling activity. These roads would not be incorporated into the Thoroughfare Plan but are recommended generally in the locations
provided on the Proposed Road Network Map. These streets would typically have a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet with the potential for on-street parking.
Additional Roads/Access Points (see Notes F - J)
The following roads shown on the Proposed Road Network Map may be public (state-maintained) or private.
Note G: East/West route through Southeast Quadrant connecting from Courthouse Road at or in the vicinity of the existing access drive/signalized intersection
on Courthouse Road and connecting to Oxbridge Road at or in the vicinity of the existing intersection of Oxbridge Road and Oxbridge Place.
Note H: East/West route providing access to the Northeast Quadrant from intersection of proposed Amberdale Drive and Rockwood Park access road.
Note I: North/South route connecting to existing signalized intersection at Route 360 (Existing Rockwood Square Shopping center entrance)
Note J: New East/West route through the middle of the Southwest Quadrant connecting Price Club Boulevard to existing signalized intersection at Courthouse
Road (entrance to Rockwood Square Shopping Center)
Page 387 of 399
51 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Additional Street Section
For Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road, see image below. Improvements along these roads should provide for a buffer/tree l awn between travel lanes and
sidewalks, and wider sidewalks to provide for a more comfortable pedestrian environment. While these roads currently exist, additional right-of-way and
improvements may be required with new development projects. Exact facility treatment would be evaluated and approved by state and county Transportation
Departments.
Page 388 of 399
52 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Appendix 7: Recommended Bikeway Routes
The following routes, as provided in the Bikeways & Trails map, are general in nature and may be subject to change through the development process. Exact
routing and facility treatment will be evaluated based on available right-of-way, utilities and easements, environmental features and approvals by state and county
Transportation Departments (VDOT & CDOT).
Note: typically, shared-use paths will be 10 feet in width, unless otherwise approved by the county, and VDOT when state-maintained.
Suncrest Drive:
•Shared-use path along one side of Suncrest Drive between Hull Street Road and Courthouse Road
o On-street lanes may be considered in lieu of a shared-use path
Price Club Boulevard:
•Shared-use path along Price Club Boulevard in the approach area of the intersection with Route 360. Outside of the intersection app roach area, there is the
potential for a lane diet to reduce the current four-lane configuration down to two vehicular travel lanes with buffered on-street bike lanes in each direction.
The transition between a separate shared-use path and on-street bike lanes would likely depend upon access locations constructed during redevelopment of
the Southwest Quadrant.
Courthouse Road:
•On-street bike accommodations exist on much of this road within the Plan boundaries
•A shared-use path is recommended along one side of the road north of Tabor Lane, and south of the Horner’s Run Trail
Tabor Lane:
•Shared-use path on one side of road
•If Neighborhood Nodes develop along this road, on-street facilities may be considered
Through Rockwood Park:
•Routing through Rockwood Park is to be determined by the Department of Parks and Recreation. Routes within the park should be coordinated with planned
external connections shown on the Bikeways & Trails map.
•A route through Rockwood Park may provide an alternative to the Falling Creek Trail currently shown on the countywide Bikeways & Trails Plan.
Page 389 of 399
53 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
•Alternative locations may be considered along the existing powerline easement between Rockwood Park and Horner’s Run in the southeastern corner of
the Plan area.
Amberdale Drive:
•On-street accommodation along east/west portion of road continuing east through the Amberleigh community. Treatment would most likely be pavement
markings “sharrows” suggesting mixed traffic.
•Routing along Amberdale Drive, in combination with a trail through Rockwood Park, may provide an alternative to the Falling Creek Trail currently shown on
the countywide Bikeways & Trails Plan.
Oxbridge Road and Oxbridge Place:
•Shared-use path along these roads
Page 390 of 399
54 | C h a p t e r 1 1 – S p e c i f i c A r e a P l a n s
11.5: ROCKWOOD SPECIAL FOCUS AREA
Appendix 8: Additional Setback Diagrams
The following images provide setback concepts for commercial, mixed-
use and multi-family uses from interior (local) streets as well as setbacks
for multi-family uses from major arterial streets such as Hull Street and
Courthouse Roads.
Page 391 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 17.F.
Subject:
To Consider a Third Lease Amendment with 5G Air, LLC for Construction of Aircraft Hangars at the
Chesterfield County Airport
Board Action Requested:
Hold a public hearing to consider a third amendment to the lease agreement with 5G Air, LLC for the
construction of aircraft hangars at the Chesterfield County Airport.
Summary of Information:
The original lease agreement with 5G Air, LLC for the construction of two aircraft hangars at the Chesterfield
County Airport required the lessee to complete construction of the hangars by July 1, 2020. This deadline was
extended to November 1, 2020 via previous Board action primarily due to weather related delays.
Progress continued on the construction of both hangars but the lessee encountered ongoing significant weather
related delays as well as COVID-19 related supply chain challenges for materials essential to the completion of
the project. In that the lease, and the 1st Amendment to the lease, had no provision to address weather related
construction delays, the Board approved a second lease amendment authorizing an additional 90 days beyond
November 1, 2020, thus requiring completion of the hangars by February 1, 2021. As part of this action, the
Board also authorized the County Administrator to extend the deadline an additional 60 days to April 1, 2021
should unforeseen circumstances, weather and/or supply chain challenges continue to impact the project.
The lessee was unable to finish by the April 1, 2021 deadline due to delays in establishing electrical service to
the buildings, which negatively impacted their ability to complete other construction tasks requiring electrical
power. Accordingly, the lessee has requested additional time to complete construction. Power has been
established at the hangars and remaining tasks are in motion, but construction is still incomplete. If approved,
the Board would be granting the lessee an additional 90 days beyond April 1, 2021 and also granting the
County Administrator authority to extend the deadline until construction is complete should unforeseen
circumstances, weather and/or supply chain challenges continue to impact the project.
Attachments:
1.5G Air LLC - Third Lease Amendment-draft
Preparer:Clay Bowles, Director
Page 392 of 399
Approved By:
Page 393 of 399
THIRD LEASE AMENDMENT
This Third Lease Amendment, dated April 29, 2021, is made and entered into by and
between the County of Chesterfield, (“County”) and 5G Air, LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability
Corporation (“Tenant”) to amend the Lease entered into between the parties on January 1, 2019
(“Lease”), as follows:
1. Section 9.1 of the Lease, New Hangar Construction, is hereby amended to state that if
Tenant fails to complete construction of the New Hangars (as defined in the Lease) by July 1,
2021, then the term of the Agreement shall terminate.
2. All other provisions of the Lease not inconsistent with this Second Lease Amendment
shall remain in full force and effect.
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
By: ___________________________________
Name: ________________________________
Title: _________________________________
5G Air, LLC
By: ___________________________________
Name: ________________________________
Title: _________________________________
Approved as to form:
________________________
Michael S. J. Chernau
Sr. Deputy County Attorney
0637:117930.1
Page 394 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 17.G.
Subject:
To Consider an Amendment to the Code of the County of Chesterfield Related To Serving and Consuming
Alcoholic Beverages on County Property
Board Action Requested:
Consider an amendment to the Code of the County of Chesterfield granting the County Administrator the
authority to approve all requests whereby alcoholic beverages may be consumed on County property when
served by appropriately licensed entities.
Summary of Information:
Section 14-23 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, currently allows the County
Administrator to authorize special permits for the service and consumption of alcoholic beverages on County
property during events upon the requesting entity obtaining an appropriate license issued by the state
department of alcoholic beverage control.
This amendment removes the event-related restriction from the current ordinance, thus extending the County
Administrator's approval authority to all requests.
Attachments:
1.Ordinance amending Section 14-23
Preparer:Clay Bowles, Director
Approved By:
Page 395 of 399
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 14-23 RELATING TO
DRINKING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, OR TENDERING SAME
TO ANOTHER, IN A COUNTY PARK OR AT OTHER FACILITIES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1)That Section 14-23 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is
amended and re-enacted to read as follows:
Sec. 14-23. - Drinking alcoholic beverages, or tendering same to another, in a county park
or at other county facilities.
(a)No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage containers or drink an
alcoholic beverage or tender a drink of an alcoholic beverage to another in a county park or on
county property, including property used for a park or a school, except as permitted by
subsection (b) below.
(b)After obtaining a valid banquet an appropriate license issued by the state
department of alcoholic beverage control, alcoholic beverages may be served and consumed at
an event on county property pursuant to the terms of a special permit approved and issued by
the county administrator or his designee. This subsection shall not apply to property used for a
school.
(c)No person shall possess opened alcoholic beverage containers on any county
property used for a school or on any street, road, or highway located in the county.
(d)Violation of this section shall constitute a class 4 misdemeanor.
(2)That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
0637:119143.1
Page 396 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 17.H.
Subject:
To Consider an Ordinance Amendment to Move the Polling Place for Precinct 106 from Harrowgate
Elementary School at 15501 Harrowgate Road, to the New Harrowgate Elementary School Located at 4000
Cougar Trail
Board Action Requested:
Consider an ordinance amendment to move the polling place for Precinct 106 from Harrowgate Elementary
School at 15501 Harrowgate Road, to the new Harrowgate Elementary School located at 4000 Cougar Trail.
Summary of Information:
The polling place for Precinct 106 in the Bermuda Magisterial District has been Harrowgate Elementary School
at 15501 Harrowgate Road. The County has built a new elementary school to replace the old Harrowgate
Elementary School; therefore, it is proposed that the the polling place be moved to the new Harrowgate
Elementary School at 4000 Cougar Trail.
Although the General Assembly has enacted a moratorium on changing precinct boundaries until after the 2020
census and redistricting cycle has been concluded, this moratorium does not preclude polling place changes.
Attachments:
1.Ordinance Amendment - Polling Place for Harrowgate Elementary School
Preparer:Jeff Mincks, County Attorney
Approved By:
Page 397 of 399
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF
CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND
RE-ENACTING SECTION 7-3 BY MOVING THE
POLLING PLACE HARROWGATE VOTING PRECINCT
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1)That Section 7-3 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is
amended and re-enacted to read as follows:
Sec. 7-3. Precinct boundaries and polling places.
The following shall be the precinct boundaries and polling places for magisterial districts
in the county:
o o o
BERMUDA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
o o o
Harrowgate Voting Precinct (106):
o o o
The voting place for Harrowgate Voting Precinct shall be Harrowgate Elementary School,
15501 Harrowgate Road 4000 Cougar Trail.
o o o
(2)That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
116677.1
Page 398 of 399
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: April 28, 2021 Item Number: 20.A.
Subject:
Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on May 26, 2021 at 2:00
p.m. in the Public Meeting Room.
Attachments:
None
Preparer:Sara Hall, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
Approved By:
Page 399 of 399