06-12-96 MinutesHINUTES
Supsrvisors i~ Attemda~¢e:
F~. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Vice Ch~m.
Kr. Lane B, Ramsoy
County Administrator
~taff in
}~. C~aig Bryant, Dir.,
Utilitle~
~. N. E. Carmichael,
Commi=s~on~r of Revsnue
Ma. Marilyn Cole,
Asst. to County Adnin.
Ms. Faith L,
Clerk to tbs Board
Asst. Co. Admin.~
Legls. ~vcs. and
Intsrgovern.
Mr. Willla~ D.
Building official
chief Robert L. ~anes, Jr.,
Fire Department
Mr. ~ichael Golden, Dir.,
Parka end Recreation
Mr, Lawrenue C. Haake, III,
Registrar
~r. Bradford S.
Deputy Co. A~in.,
Kanaqement services
County Ombudsman
Dir., Plannin9
Mr. Robert L.
Mr. Paul Patton, Aot. Dir.~
Dir., B~dget & Management
Deputy Co. Admin.,
Mr. Frederick Willis, Jr.,
~r, D~niel called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at
3:00 p.m.
~6-$46
On motion of Mr. McEale, seconded by Mr. Barber,
approved the minutes cf May 22~ 1996, aa ~ub~itted.
were no county Administrator's Comments at t/lis time.
~. BOARD COM~iTTEE REPORT~
There were ne Beard co~ittee Report~ et thi~ ti~e.
~A~E8 IN THE ORDBR OP PRESENTATION
On motion of M~. Daniel, seconded by Mr. McHale, the Board
~el~ted Item $.A., claim o£ Forte~ra Corporation; dule~d Item
· 8.~., Claim of Forterru Corporation; added Ite~ ?.D.21.,
Transfer of C~over Hill and Ka~uaca Distrlc~ Three Cent Road
Fund~ to the SChool Board to Purchase Ten Cadet Sabers for the
J.K.O.T.C. Progra~ at Manchester ~igh School, A~mln~=tered by
the Meadowbrook J.R.O.T.C.; and added Item 14.H., Adoption of
Resolution Honoring tho Route 360 Corridor Plan Part±oipant~ in
ReCognition of the County's Receipt of the Virginia Merltorioum
~ro£esoiomal ~lanning Award and, adopted ~e agenda, a~
amended.
Vote:
FIFTEEN YEARS OF DEDICATED 8ERVIC~ TO CHESTE~TIELD
to receive the resolution.
On motion of the Board, the following r~$olution was adopted:
Ckester~ield county for sixteen ~ear~ in combined service for
WHEREAS, Mrs. Cuffe selfi~ssly involved her time and
talents in Ieadin~ ~e Asse~sor's Office in the collection of
food for the Emergency Food Progra~ a~mlnlstered~rough Social
~s~ices; and
~AS, ~s. Cuffe provided excellence in eYe, aspect of
all responsibilitie~ and duties assigned by d~onstrating
ao~uracy, 9rofessionalism, prid~ and dependability; and
tea~ attitude by extending to her co-work~r~ within the office
loyalty and friendship; and
96-347
WHeReAS, Mrs. Cuffs participated in and put into p~actice
~he attitude and ~kills ef Total Quality Improvement and served
as s Key Resource psrmon for two years~ and
WHEREA~, ~rs, Cuffs de~onst~ated daily, h~r d~votion and
love for her Church, her family, her homeland of Nova Scotia
for which she remained a loyal Canadian citizen, her cc-worker~
and her e0mmgnity.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT R~HGLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the
contributions of ~s. Harriet L. Cuffs and extendE, on ~shalf
cf its members and th~ citizens of Chesterfield County, their
sppreciatiun for her exceptional servi¢~ to the county,
ARD, ~= IT FURTBER RESOLVED~ that a Copy of th~s
resolution be pr=seated to FLT. Frsnk Cuffs, Mrs. C~f£~s
husband, and that this ree01uticn be permanently recorded among
the papers of this Board of Supervisor~ of Chester£iald County,
virginia.
of Mrs. ~arriat L. Cuffs to chesterfield County.
Estate Office stated Krs. Cuffs was a fine ~mploye~ beloved
friend, and it was a privilege to have worked with her.
loyal sn~ dedicated employee. He offere~ him blessings to Mr.
~r. ~ioas sba=ed =his time had been ~chsduled for a work
cession to review the 199~ General Assembly legislation. He
briefly reviewe~ 1996 Virginia General Assembly Legislation
affecting the County including changes requiring Board action:
changes which may require ~oard action; a~d changes affecting
the County for which no action ie required...~e nsted changes
in the 1996 Legislation include a larger number of optional
item~ and that a number of Iegislativa items refer to the
recudificat~on ~rocamm by including several of the legislative
changes in the recodification p~bliu hearing. Ho stated the
reoodication process will reduce t~e number of public hearing~
needed to be h~ld.
public hearing~ to consider the following ~996 Virginia General
Assembly Legislative items which require Ordinance changes and
A. CO.UNITY DEVELOPHE~T
1. Amendment to the state code to clarify that a taxpayer
munt be an aggrieved taxpayer in order =o appeal a
decision of the boa~d Of aching appeals.
2. A~e~d~ent to the state code to rec~lire that any proposed
amendnent cf the $oniDq ordinance ~hall req~ir~ ~ritten
notice to be qiven by the local planning commission at
or their agent~i of each parcel of land involved.
ini~iatlon of an a~plicatlon for a special exception,
~peoial uoe permit, variance, rezoning or oth~r l~nd
permit, or prior to final approval, the authorizing body
may require the applicant to produce satisfactory evidence
3. Amendment to ~he Local Grievance Procedures ~o add ~o ~he
d~finitio~ of "grievance" complaints of: (i)
discrlmlna=ion on the basis of religion and (ii)
retaliation for reporting an incidence of fraud, abuse,
gross mismanagement.
4. Amendment to ~he ~a~e ~od~ to provide
notwithstanding the contrary provisions of the local
grievance ~rocedures, a final panel decision ~at would
r~sult in the reinstatement of an employee of
~herif~ office who ~s been terminated for cause may
reviewed by the circuit court for the locaSity upon th~
5. Amendment to th~ st~=~ coda which provide~ a uniform
license %ax to be used by local governments.
Amendment to the Public PTocurement Act to increase the
amount fr~ $1~,000 to $30,000 for which a public body may
establish purchase ~rocedures wi~ou~ re~iring
competitive sealed bids or competitive negotiations.
~ha same ~ethod of filing personal property tax returns
for motor vehicles to apply to trailers an~ beats.
Authorization ~o allow ~e counties of
Hanove~ a~d Hunrico to impose an additional ~un~ien%
occupancy tax not to exceed four De=dent (current maximum
now 6
24. ~en~e~t to the state cede to extend ~e
slassification for motor vehicles uwn~d by mamburs
fire department to includ~ un~ m~tur vehiQle leased
s~ch me, ers, if the me~r i~ r~qui~d by the t~rms of
~e lease to Day the personal property tax once vehicle.
6. ~en~ent to th~ stat~ co4~ to provide ~hat a duality
~rvice~ board shall include a s~e~iff o~ his designee
when practical.
96-349
(It wa~ the general csn~ens~ of the Board that the Board would
not consider Item 2~., Authorization to allow the counties of
Chesterfield~ Hanover and ~enrico to impose an additional
transient occupancy tax not to e×cee~ four percent (current
maximum now ~ percent) until the three other local government~
take action to increase %he fax. It is further noted that it
Wa~ the general consensus of the Board that it ha~ no interest
in creating a behavioral health authority. It is further noted
the public hearings will be advertised and held as staff
~aterminee a~Droprlats a copy of the 1996 vlrgi~ia General
Assembly Legislation Affecting the County ia filed with the
DaDer~ of this Board.)
It was th~ general consensus of the Board to take no action on
the following 1996 Leqislativo items:
COmmUNITY
7. ~endment to the ~tata code to authorize the governing
body to {i) ~gtablish qualifying county-wide affordable
dwelling unit ~ale~ prices based on local market
conditions, (ii) establish county-wide a~£crdable dwelling
unit qualifying income guidelines, and (iii) offer
incentives other than density increases, such as
~edueticns or waiver of permit, development, and
8. ~sndmen~ to ~he ~ute cods to require that lo,al
subdivision ordinance provision~ r~at~d %o
improvemmn%~ required by local ordlnance~ for vehicular
control.
~sn~ent to th~ state code to extend the period in which
a locality may allo~ the planning co~ission ~o mak~
zoning amendment reco~endation from 9o to 100 day~.
13. ~enOmen= ~o =he state code to authorize a locality to
create lo¢~1 technology zones of up tu 1~9 acres p~r zone
which includes tax incentives.
(Mr. M~hale re~e~ted ~taff to study the
applicability ~f thi~ i~em Co ~xisting businms~ and
industry.)
14. ~endmen= allowing a ~eDa~ate ~achinery and tools r~te for
e~ipment used in semi-conductor manufacturing.
~n~men~ %o the state code allowing localities to =rears
a co,unity devetupmunt authority with a board that
appointed in the sams manner as a wa~r mhd
authority board.
B. ~MINIST~TION O~
17. ~endment %o the state code which authorizes 1o=alltles %o
establish a location in public facilitle~ fo~ absentee
voting in p=r~on prior to election ~ay in ~ddition to the
office of th~ g~neral regis=rat or electoral'board'~'
1~. Add =he authority for counties to prepare and distribute
a neutral "plain English" ~xplanatioD Of ~ny local
D. ~ ~ERVICE~
~7. ~endmen= to the sta~e cods to provide that u b~uvioral
health authority may be crea~ed by chesterfield
S/12/96
11. Amendment ~e the state code to clarify ~ha% the planning
portions ef an approved preliminary plm~ for a period
of a final plat that is a section of a subdivision as
require information £rom a developer on potentially
expan~ivs soil~ (shrink-swsll} during the point of the
subdivision review process.
16. Amendment to the state code %a add areas of unique
architectural value located within designated
conservation, rehabilita~ion or redevelopment districts to
those areas for which a local governing body may amend its
zoning ordinmne~ and ~esignate historic landnarks.
revenue to accept late certifications from volunteer
public safety workers applying for certain
property tax clannification~.
]6. Amendment to the state code to allow and elderly or
handioapped taxpayer to submit a written statement, rather
than an ~ffidavit, when applying for s preperty
exemption.
7. N~W BU~INE2~
On motion of ~r. Mc~ale, seoended by Mrs. Eumphrey, the Board
approved tse following st~eetlight installation cost
Ben'muds District
* Fiulding Road and Pruirewood Drive
Cost to install light:
* Kidden Creek Court, in the eul-de=sau
Cost to install light: $71g.69
Vote: Unanimous
.T_:~.,.,, , ~PPOINTMBNT~
On motion of Mrm. ~umphr~y, m~¢onded by M_r. McHale, the Board
suspended its rules at this ti~e to allow mimultaneous
nomination/appointment of m~mb~rs to serve on the John Tyler
Community College Local Board.
On motion of Mr. McHale, ~econded by ~rs. Humphrey, the Board
?.B.2, Additional Appointment to the John Tyler Community
College Local Board.
Vs~e: Unanimous
On motion s£ ~r. Warren, meoonded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mtn. Lorrians Waddill to
s~rve on the John Tyler C0~Ru~ity College Local Board whose
tsr~ is effective July 1, 1~9~ an~ will expire June 30, ~OOO.
Vot~: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Warren, s~onded by Mr. McHale, tho Board
mimultaneo~sly nominated/appointe~ Mrs. Marilyn Tavenmer to
serve e~ the John Tyler Community Colleqe Local Board whomm
term is effective immediately and will e~pire June ~0, i999.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by ~rs. ~umphrey, the Board
suapsnde~ ~ts rules a= thin time to allow ~imeltaneous
nomination/appointment of a member to serve on the Aceid~n~
Vote:
On motion of Mr. McHale, ~eeonded by Mrs. Humphrey, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed ~r. Robert J. Pratt ts serve
on the Acctdsnt Review Board whose term is at the pleasure of
the Board.
(It is noted Mr. Robert J. ~ratt is replacing Mr. James D.
Whiteman on ~ho Accident Review Board.)
N~+ Lyons Wa~z, ~trategic Planning Analyst, for the Budget and
Management Department, briefly ~cvicwed the origin of the
Community Enhancement Program (CEP) and ~tated ~he Board of
$%pervi~or~ has budgeted $50,000 in the FY9~-97 Budget to be
utilized for Sunding community enhancement project~ throughout
the County. She then reviewed the two dimensional approach of
the Program and introduced Barbara Fassett, Community Planner
for the Planning Department.
96-B52
6/12/96
Ha. Barbara Faeeett etated the miseien of the CBP is to promote
citizen, business, and property owner initiated solutlons to
community concerns. She reviewed the goals of the
including empowering communities to create & vision that
empha~ize~ co--unity wellnee~ and s~lf-~uffi~i~ncy; d~veloping
community, neighborhood, and business iee~ershlp; fostering
co--unity spirit and pride, as well as a comunitment to care for
the future; imDrcving communication and underetending between
government, communities, neighborhoods, end business; promoting
issues; and making better ute of ta~ayer dollar= by addre~=ing
i~pl~ntation in~luding the c~ Coordinator
co~uni~/n~g~orhood~ to ~dent~fy co--unity
wellness and ~elf-sufflci~ncy b~ing offered to c~tizen~
organizations, ~n~ businesses; providing Proj~=t Application
workshop~ to a~i~t in the Program application D~oce~;
project Sands being utillz~d ~o promote co--unity enhanc~ent
various County departments.
. M~. Wa~z reviewed th~ project funding application
project fundin~ criteria; components of co~unlty coalitions;
liaite~ for use and will be aimed at improving County
neighborhoods and Three Cent Road Fund~ are basically
discretionary funds of th~ Board
~ar~ was brief discussion relative to the distribution of
funds among the five Magisterial Districts and the expected
graph uf this Program.
~r. ~cHal~ ~ta~ed he feels th~ Co.unity Enhancem~n~ Program
will allow the County %o provide people infrastructure building
within co~unitie~ and to ~ist in buitdin~ a future for
co--unities.
Mm. Wasz reviewed activities eligible for Program funding;
au~ivi~ies no= eligible for Program funding; and ~e co.unity
~nhan~ment ~rcgram I997 fiscal year calendar.
~. Daniel ~tated no action is required by the Board at th~s
th~ County's FY96-97 Budget.
There was brief discussion relative to the expected gro~h
~he Co.unity Enhancement Program and interested organizations
in the Program.
7.D. CO~SENT ITEMB
OF STATE P~RK'S REOUEST FOR~ECRE~TION~L ~CCES~ FUNDS
PO~ ~OCAHONTA~ STATE PARK
on motion of Mr. ~c~ale, seconded by Mr. Berber, the Board
adopted th~ following resolution:
96-353
WHEREAS, a new campground is to be developed by the
Ce~monwealth of Virginia as a recreational facility s~rving the
WHEREAS, the facility i~ in need of adequate aoce~; and
WHiR=AS, th~ procedure governing the allocation of
~eereational acce~ funde a~ set forth in Section 33-136.3
the code of Virginia, requires joint action by the Department
Of Conservation and Recreation and the
Transportation ~oard; and
WI{EREAS, a statement of policy a~r~ed Upon betwesn th~
~aid Director and Board approves the u~e cf such funds for the
ooaetruction of access roads to publiCly-owned recrmational
~reas or historical site~ ~nd
W~5~F~S, it appears to the Board that all retirements of
the law have been met to permit the Dirsctcr of the Department
of Conservation and Recreation to designate ~h~ new campground
area focal point a~ a public recreational facility and further
permit th~ commonwealth Transportation Board to provide fund~
for acces~ to thi~ p~blic recreation ar~a in accordancm with
~ectio~ ~3-1~5.~ Of ~he Co~e of vir~inla: and
~R~M, the right-of~way o~ th~ ~roDo~ed a~ess road
p~ovid~d by the Commonwealth of Virginia at no CO~% ~o
provision~ of Section 35.1-233 of th~ C~d~ o Vir inia, ~his
road =bali ba designated a "virginia B~ay" and reco~ends the
Com~onw~alt~ T~a~sp~rtaticn Board, in cooperation ~ith
Qir~utor of the Department of Cons~vatie~ a~d Recreation, take
~ app~oprlate action to implement ~his ~e$ign~tion. Further,
th= ~oard agrees, ~hat in keeping with ~he intent o~
Supervisors of Che~tmrfleld County hereby requests the Director
of the Department of Conservation and Recreation to
~his new facility a~ a public recreational ~ite and to
reco~end to ~e Commonwealth Transportatio~ ~Qa~d that
~D, B~ IT FURT~ RESOLVED, that the
Transportation Board i~ hereby requested to allocate
of Transportation to provid~ a ~uitable acce~ road
Vote: Unanimous
?.D.2. ~W:~RD .DF ~ONTR~CT TO SOUTHERN ~QNSTRUCTION FOR ~WR
OUAIL OAKS DRAINAGE PROJECT
On motion of ~r. MoHale~ seuended by ~tr. Barber~ the Board
authorized the County Administrator to execute a ¢ontract with
Southern Construction, in an amount ~ot to exceed $207,439, and
with Concrete Pipe, in the amount cf $~7,~1, for the Q~ail
Oak= Drainage Projeat. (It is noted fund~ fo~ the project are
available from remaining de~lar$ ~n ~e FY96 Ca~ital
Improvement Program (cIP) and current FYg? CIP.)
Vote: Unanimous
6/~/~
96-354
AWARD OF BEQUIREHENTS CO~TRACTS TO I.V.
GROUP. A~D DEWBERRY AND DAVIS FOR ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES
After brief discussion, oR motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by
execute requlrement~ contracts to I.V. Harris and A=soclate~,
I~eorporated; The Mosetey MsClintock Group; and Dewberry and
Davi~, for architectural services,
?.D.4. APPRO%~kL AND APPROPRIATION OF C~RD~OViASCH~
On motion of Mr. Mc~ale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved and apprepriatod $40~000~ in the FY97 Budget, for the
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Grant whioh was awarded to
Chesterfield County Health Department by the State Department
of Health,
Vu~e: Unanimou~
7.D.5. CORRECTIONS TO BO~RD MTNUTES CT ~PRIL 10~ 199~
On motion of Nr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Earber, the Board
a~en~ed the ~ear~ minute~ of A~ril 10, 1996 a~ ~ellew~:
FROM~
"Thi~ day thc County Environmental Engineer, in accordance wi~h
direatien~ from this Board, made report in ~rriting upon his
examination of the roads in ~iehau~ Creek, Section A,
Midlothian Districtr and
Whereas~ the Resident ~ngi~eer for the Virgini~ Department cf
Transportation ha~ advised the Director of E~viro~e~tat
Eegineering, the streets in ~ichaux Creek, Section A,
Midlethian Dimtrict, me~t ~he requirements established by the
$~hdiyi~ion Street Requirements of the Virginia Departn~ent of
Transportation, and
W~ereas, the ce~ty a~d the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entered into an agreement, reoord~d in De~d
Book 2453, Page 40S, January ~1, 1994~ for all stermwater
detention/retention facilitie~ in th~ Co~Rty-
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, an~ on motion of ~Lr~
McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber~ it i~ re~olved that the ~oad~
in Mi~m~ Creek, ~ection A, Midlothian District, b~ and they
hereby are established as public road~.
~d be it fur~mr re~olved, tha~ the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and i~ hereby requestsd to take into the
Secondary system, p~uan~ to section 33.1-229; Co~e Of
Virginiu~ and the Department's Subdivision Street R~ir~ents,
th~ ~ollowlng:
N~m~ Of Street: North Otterd~le Road Length: ~.1~ mile
~om: N. Otterdale Road, State Route
970, 0.01 mile nor~ of Wyld~rose
Drive, grate Rout~ 971
Beginning of t~pora~ turna~o~,
0.~ mile ~orth of ~lderose Drive,
61~2/96
GuaranSeed Right-of-way of width: 70 Seat.
Nam~ of Street: ~ichaux Bluff Orlve
F~em: N. 0tterdale Road, 0.07 mile
north o~ Wylderose Road, State
Route 971
To: Intersection with Miohaux view Way~
0.15 mile east of N. 0tterdalo Road
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 60 feet.
Name of Street: Michaux View Way
From: Beginning of temporary turnaround,
0.13 mile east of Michauz Bluff Dr~ve
To: ERd of road, 0.03 mile north
of M~nhau~ Bluff Drive
Guaranteed Right-of-Way Width: 50 feet.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight
distance, elea~ zone and designated ~irginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements indinatad on the development
plat.
These roads serve 18 lot~.
Length: 0.15 mile
Length: 0.16~ile
Section A, Pla% Book 79, Page 87, November 11, 1992.
"This day the County Environmen:~l Engineer, in accordance with
dlreotlon~ from thi~ ~eard, made report An writing upon his
examination of the roads in Micha~ c~ee~, Section A,
Midlothieu District, and
~hereas, the Resident ~ngineer for the Virginia Department of
Transportation has advised the Dizeoto~ of Environmental
Engineering, the streets in ~ichaux Creek, Section A~
Midlothias Distriot~ meet the ~eq~i~ementu established by the
~ubdivi~ion Street R~nuirements of the Virginia De~ar~ment of
Transportation~ and
Wne~ea~, the CoUnty and the Virginia Department of
Transportation have entere~ into sm agreement, recorded in D~ed
BGck 2~53~ Page 4S5~ January ~1; 1994, for all stormwater
detention/retention facilltie~ in the County.
Therefore, upon consideration whereof, &n~ on motion of Mr.
MeHale, seconded by M~. Barber, it is re~olved that th~ roads
in ~ichaux Creek, ~ection A~ ~idlothian Dis%rie~ be and they
~e~eby a~a emtablished as public road=.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and is hereby requested to ta~e into the
Secondary System, pursuant to Section 33.1-~29, Code of
V~rginia, and the Departm~nt'~ Subdivision Street Requirements,
the following:
~ama of Str~t: North 0tterdale ~oad
From: N. otterdale Rsad~ State Route
970, 0.01 mile north of wylderose
Drive, State Route 971
~nd of ~vem~t, ~,09 mile north of
Wylderase Drive, State Route 971
Gu=ran~ed Right-of-Way of width: 70 feet.
96-356
Name of Street: Miohuux Bluff Drive Length: 0.15 mile
From: N. 0tterdale Road, 0.07 mil~
north of Wylderose Road~ State
TO: Intersection with Michael View Way,
0.1~ mile east of N, otterdale Road
G~anteed Right-of-Nay Width; 60 feat.
Fr~m: Beginning of temporary turnaround,
0.13 mile east of Michaux Bluff Drive
snd of road, Q.0~ mile north
of Michael Bluff Drive
Guaranteed Right-of-Way width: 50 feet.
T~is reguest is inclusive of the adjaues~ slo9e, sight
distance, clear zone and designated Virginia Department of
Transportation drainage easements indicated on the ~velmDmen~
plat. An a~ditional right-of-way for N. 0tt~rdal= Road a~d
This section of Miohaux Creek is recorded as follows:
See=ion A, Plat Book 79, Page 87, November 11, 1992.
Vote: Unanimous"
Vote: Unanimous
7.D.6.a. CLOV~R ~ILL DISTRICT FOR ~OST PROK ACTI?iTIE~
AT KO~ACAN HIGH S~HOOL
On motion of Mr. McHala, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
appropriated $~,000, from the Clover Hill District Three Cent
Road Fund~ to th~ School Board for Po~t-Prom Aetivitie~ at
Monaoan High school.
TORGM RUN
On motion Of ~. MeHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
appropriated $~00, from the Matoaoa District Three Cent Road
Fund, to the Police Department to d~fray oxp~n~e~ a~sociatod
with the Special 01ympi=s Torch Bun.
Vote: Unanimous
?.D.T. APPROV~-L OF DE~ART~EN~ OF ~RIHINA~ J-g~TIOE SHR¥I~ES
GI~A~T ~OH THE G~O~LTH ~TTOR~.~S OFFICE ~
On motion of ~r. ~oHale, seconded by ~r. Barber, =ne Board
appropriated $78,753 to t~e FY97 Budget, from Department of
Criminal Justice services grant revenue, to ~und the remainder
of an ongoi~ a~to~ated networked case management ~y~te~ for
tho Co~onw~al~ Attorney's office.
Vote: Unanimous
6/~2/96
96-357
?.E.8. TP.~N~FER O~ ~[~DS FOR TEE FYP~ SU~PL~ENTAL
CREETERFIELD ROA~ FD~DS. APPROVAL OF UPDATED
O~ motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the
transfer=ed $~0,~ from the General Road Improvement~ Acoo~nt
(available after ~uly 1, 1996) for the FY96 Supplemental
cheu~rfiel4 Read Fund; approved the updated Chesterfield Road
F~d P~oject Development Schedule; and adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, Section 33.1h75.1 of the Code of Virginia
permits the Commonwealth T~anspor~e~ion Board to ~ake an
equivalent matching allecation ~o any County for de~ignation~
by the governing body of u9 to 25 percent or $500,000,
whichever is greeter, of funds received by it during the
current fiscal ye=r pursuant to the "State and Local Fiscal
Assistance Act of 197~" for use by the Commonwealth
Transportation ~oar~ to ¢on~truot, maintain, or improve primary
and secondary highway eystem~ within ~u=h County; and
WI~EREAS~ th~ Virginia D~partment of Transportation
ha= noti£i~ the County that $SQ,QQQ is the maximLrm amount of
chesterfield Co~ty funds that will be matched by the ~tat~ as
a =up~Iemental FY95-96 allooation.
~OW, T~R~FOR= BE IT RESOLVED, that the Cheaterfield
county Board of ~upervisors tranmf~rm $~O,OOQ from the general
rued improvements aoceunt for the FY95-9~ Supplemental
Allocation PrOgram and requests VEST to provide an equivalent
ma~oh.
A~, EE IT FURTHER RE$OLVED~ that the FY95-96
~upplemental funds be allocated for the following projeot~
From Chester Road to Route 10
($]0,000 VDOT, SSO,O00 County)
Vote: Unanimous
School Board Budget and reserved the necessary ~un~a for
reappropriation in the FY97 Budget in various accounts. (It i~
note~ a espy of =hess adjustments is filed with the papers of
thi~ Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
?.D.i~. A~PKOYAL OF UTILITY OOHTRACT FOR DEEP CRRE~,.TRUNK
On motion of ~tr. Mc~ale, seoonded by Mr. Barber, the Board
aDDrove~ a Utility Contract for Deep Creek Trunk Sawer
Extension, Phas~ i and ~ Project which project inol~de$
lines as follows and authorized th~ County ~d~ini~trator to
~/12/96
Contraot A~ount= Estimated Total
Total ~mtimated County Cost:
Wastewater (Oversizing)
IRefun~ thru connections)
Estimated DsveloDer Cost:
Code~ (Overriding)
Diotrlot: ~ateace
$37~572.00
$106,735.70
$259~836.30
Vote: Unanlmon~
?.D.11. CONVEYANCE O~ E~SRMENT~
7.D.11-a. WITH VIRGIWI~ ELECTRIC AND POWER CO~pANy TO fNBTA~
RNDER~ROUND ROWER LINR~ TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE
NEW MULTI-PUrPOSE BUILDING AT CA~ R~KER
On mo~ion of Mr. McHale, seconded by ~r. Barber, the Board
authoriz=d the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County A~ministrator to ~xeoute an easement agreement with
Virginia Electric and Power Company to install underground
power line~ to provide service to the new multi-purpose
b~ilding at Camp Baker. (It i~ noted a copy of the plat is
filed with the papers oX this Board.)
VO~O: Unanimous
7.D.l~.b. WITK VIRGINIA RL~CTRId ;%NB POWER dOMRANY TO ~N~T~LL
~NDER~ROUND POWER LINER TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE
Virginia Electric and Power Company to install underground
Elementary School. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed
wi~h the papers of thi~ board.)
WITH VIR~tNI~ ELBCTRI~ AND ROWE~ OOMP~/PYTO IN~TALL
UND~S~O~D ~OW~ LINES TO PROVIDE ~E~VIGE TO THE
NEW ADDITION CE RORIOBS BL~MENT~RY ~OHOOL ~NO TO
NEW BUR LOOP
on motion of Mr. McHale~ seconded by ~. Ba~ber~ t~e Boar~
authoriz~d the ChaXrman of th~ Board of Supervisors an~ th~
county Administrator ~o execute an easement agreement wit~
Virginia Eleetr~ and Power Company to install undergroun~
power lines to provide eervice to the new addition Of Rohious
Elemsntary School and to re-rsute the service to the ballfields
due to t~e new bus loop. (It is noted a copy of the plat is
filed with the DaRers of this Board.)
vote: Unanimous
?.D.~l.d. ~ITH BBLL ATLANTIG-VIHGINIA, INOORPORATED TO INST~LL
~ER~ROUND T~LE~HONR ~LR~ TO P~OVI~E
On mo~io~ Of ~r. McHal~ seconded by ~. Berber, the Boa~d
authorized the ~airman of the ~oard of Sup=rvi~ors and the
Co~ty A~inlstrator to execute an easement agreement with Bell
Atlantic-Virginia, Incorporated to install underground
96-359
telephone cables to provide phone service to the new G.W.
Carver Middle School. (It is noted a Copy of the vicinity
sketch is tiled with t~e papers of this Board.)
?.n.l~.~. WITH BELL A~L;t~4~IG-vIEGINIA. INCORPORATED.TO INST~?J.
On motion of ~r. ~cHale, seconded by }Tr. Barber~ the Board
authorized the Chait~nan cf th~ Board cf Supe~i~orc an~ the
cowry Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Bell
Atlantic-Virginia, Incorporated to install underground
Points Fire Station. fit i$ noted a cop~ of the vlcln~ty
s~etc~ is filed with the papers of this Board.]
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of K~. Me,ale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
install a private ~ewer and water service within a privatm
Bluff Ro=~, subject to the execution and ~eCordation of an
agreement acceptable to th~ Cu~nty A~orney. (It is note~ a
Boe~d.)
On motion of Mr. McHsle~ seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
approved a r~qu~nt ~ro~ ~. James W. and Ms. S~eila ~. Moore to
~a~e road improvements wifhin a~ existing fifty foot right-of-
way known, as ~ves Lane, subject.~o the-exeout~o~.o~ .a license
agreement. (It i~ noted a ca~y of the plat i~ filed with the
paper~ of thi~ Board,)
AN E~I~TING SIXTEEN FOOT E~S~NT A(~ROSS LOT ~1~
On motio~ of ~. ~cHul~, ~econded by ~r, ~erber, the Board
approved a request from ~r. Jame~ and M~ Ruth'Gra~t-ts'hav~-"a
fence encroach within an e×i~t~g ~ixt~en foot easement across
LOt 21, Five FO~S Village, Pha~e IV, subject to the execution
of a license mgre~ment. (It is noted a copy of the plat is
Vut=: Unanimous
96-360
7.~.1~.d. FROM CYRUS M. AND N~N. O. k~a~N TO INSTALL A
SERVICE FOB A RESIDENCE OFF FOHEST HILL
approved a request from Cyrus W. and Nan ~. Amen to install a
privat~ ~ewer nmrv~u~ within a =eh foot private sewer easement
for a residence off Forest Mill Avenue, subject to the
execution and ~aeardation of an agreement aocsptable
County Attorney. (It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch
filed with th~ papsrm 0f thi~ Board.)
V~te: Unanimous
MULBERRY CORPORATION
On motion of Mr. ~c~ale~ seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
accepte~, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a parcel
of land 0ontaining 0,074 aere~ along B~lmant Rca~ (State ~oute
6§~), from Mulberry Corporation, a Virginia Corporation, and
authorized the County Administrator to ex,outs th~ necessary
de~d. (It is noted a G0py of th~ plat i~ f~led with the papers
of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
O~ ~IV~ K. R. GA~-% ~b VIJAYA L.
On motion of F~r. Mo~al~, ascended by ~r. Barber, the Board
authorized the County Attorney to proceed with eminent domain
aoro~ prop=try of siva ~.R. Gars and vijaya L. ~ara for the
installation cf the sewer line to se~e Ma~a Maid Dairy and
in~tructed the County Administrator to notify the owner by
certified nail on J~e i4~ 1996 of th~ County's intention to
Rroceed with the acquisition of the easement . (~t is noted a
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of thi~ Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
7.D.1S. REOUESTS FOR FIREWOP-KS DISPLAY~
7.D.~5.a. 0HBSTERFI~LD OOUI~TY FAIRGROURD~
On motion of PiT. McHale, saccnde~ by Mr. Barber, the ~oard
approved a request for a permit from the Chesterfield County
Park~ and Recreation Department %o stage a flraworkm dis~lsy et
the Chesterfield County Fairgrounds o~ July 4, 1996 (no rain
Vo~e: Unanimous
~,.D.i$.b. CLOVERLEAF HALL
On motion of Mr. ~c~ale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
a~p~ove~ a request for a ~ermit from M~. Susan A. McConnell of
the Cloverleaf Mall Merchants Association to stage a fireworks
display at Cloverleaf Mall in the vacant field behind Mech='s
Department Rtor~ on July §, 199~ (no rain date).
Vote: Unanimou~
96-361
On motion of ~r. ~c~a~e, seconds~ by RS. ~ar~er, the ~oard
approved an entertainment/musical festival p~r~it to the ~aster
~al Society tc ~onduc% a series of out~oor mu~i~ concerts to
be held Friday even~ng~ beginning June 14, 199~ and ending
August 90, 1996 at Moorefield Park, ~ubjeot to appropriate
condlticn~ fmpo~ed by ~taff.
in the amount of $69,130, to provide funding for overtine and
equipment asso¢iat~d w~th highway safety issues. (It i~ noted
th~ ~oun~y'~ in ~i~d match i~ provided in the
Operating Budget and no ~d~itional e9e~a=ing funds will be
expended from tbs Police Department.)
7.D.18. SET D~TE FOR P~LIC H~ARING~
?.D.18.a, T0 ~ONSIBB~ ~N ARERDMEET TO THE FY95-96 BUDGET TO
~PPROPRIATE VIRGINIA D~P~RTME~T OF T~-~SPORTATION
consider an amendment to thm F¥9~-9~ ~udget to appropriate
Virginia Department of Trans~or=atlon (VDOT) rei~bursementm for
On motion of ~r. Rc~ale, m~eonded by Mr. Barber, the Board set
the date of July ~4, 1996 at ?:00 p.m. for a public hearing to
co,sider an ordinance increamlng the rate on the Transient
Occupancy Tax from two percent to six percent.
Vote: Unanimous
7.D.19. APPROVAL O~ LEASE OF ~]tB GREENFIELD ~OMb~NITy
ASSOCIATION CO~NITy BUILDIRG FOR OPERATING A
Om motion of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. ~arber, the Board
authorized the County A~ministrator to enter i~to a lease
agreement withGreenfield community Assuciat-ion, for'e~sratin~
a te~ center program at the Greenfield Co,unity Asseoiation
Building from J~ly 8, 1996 to August 30, ±996, subject to
approval by the County Attorney.
9~-362
?oD.Z0, AUTHORIZATION TO AID HR. JAMIE LEE CHAFIN IN THE
ACOUISITION OF A SEWB~ EASEMENT A~qD
authorized Right-of-Way staff to ~id Mr. Jamie Le~ Chafin
easement across property cf Ms. Alice C. Wewland and
Virginia L. Jo~on, ~ubj~ ~o t~e e~e~u~ion o~ a comtract by
Mr. Chafin agreeing to pay for all cost~. (It is noted a copy
CENT ~O~D FUNDS TO TM~ S~BOOL BOARD TO PURDHASE TEN
~ADET SA~ER~ FOR THE J.R.O.T.C. PROGRAM AT HANC~EgTER
HIGH ~HOOL
0~ ~ti0n of ~r. MeMale, ~eoondcd by Mr. Barber, the ~card
. transferred $1,~00 fro~ the Clov~r ~il~ District Thre~ Cent
Road Fund and $1,500 from the Matoaca District Three Cant Road
Cadet Sabers for the J.R.O.T.C. Program at Manchester High
Vote: Unanimous
F~r. Danlel introduced Colonel Carl Baker, the new Police Chief,
Colonel Baker stated he has experienced a very warm
welcome while ge=ting to know each division cf the
Ch~ster£ield have been enjoyable.
~r. Daniel stated he has heard ~nly favorable oe~ments about
services personnel daring a recent visit from
Sot th=ir ~rofemsionalism during Pr~sldenti~l Candidat~ Dole's
visit.
~r~. ~mphrey also commended Colonel Baker and ~e Police
Ol~p~cs Torch Run event held in the Count~ and expressed
in ~e ~vent.
acknowledged that ~ajor Dennis McDonald was in ~arg~ of
Speoial ol~Dics Tor~ R~ event.
on motion o£ ~r. ~arber, seconded by Mr. MoHale, the Board
accepted tlne following r~ports:
95-363
Projects; Dis~ric~ Road and Street Light Funds; Leas=
~IRGI~IA, 1950, ~E ~/~NDED, FOR CONSULT~T~O~ WIT~ LEGAL
CO0-NSEL RELATING TO PROB~L~.~ITIGATION INVOLVING Tg~
0n ~0tion of Mr. McHale, seconded bye. Barber, the Board went
into an Executive Session P~uant to S~ction 2.1-~44A.7,, Code
of Virginia, 19~0, as ~anded, for Consultation with Legal
counsel Re!a~ing to P~obablu Litigation Involving the
Const~ction of Center Pointe Fire $~ation.
ReConvening:
On motion of Mr. Barber, seconded by Mrs. Humphrey, the
following resolution wa~ adopted:
WHeReAS, the Board of Zupurvisers h~s thi~ day adjeurn~
Boa~d and in accurdance with the previsions of the 9ir~inia
Freedom of Informatio~ Ao%~ and
WHEREAS, the virginia F~eedem of Information Act
~ffechive July 1~ 19~9 provides for certification that ~ueh
Executive Session was cenducted in conformity with law.
NOW, T~BREPORE BE IT RESOLVED! the Boa~d of Supervisors
does hereb~ certify that to the be~= o~ each member's
know/edge, ii 0nly publio busines~ matters lawfully exempt~
from open meeting requirements under ~e Freedom oX Information
Act were discussed in the EXecutive Session to which thi~
certification applies, and
ii) only such public business matter~ a~ were identified
dlssen=s from this certification.
The Board bei~q polled, the vote wan as followm:
Mr, McHale : Aye.
Mrs. Humphrey: Aye.
~r. Warren : Aye.
Mr, Daniel : Aye.
11. DINNER
On motion sS ~rs. Humphrey~ ~eeonded by Mr. Barber, the Board
rucessed to the Administratlcn Buildlng, Roo~ ~OZ, for a dinner
meeting with the Human Servi~e~ Coalition,
Mr. Daniel w~loo~ed everyone to the ~eeti~g and introductions
were made of tho~e pr~nent,
96-364
Coalition and reviewed the changing demogruphy of Che~tezfield
county's population~ changing societal values and expectations
of the County's population; welfare r~for~ and economic
develoDment~ t~e changing nature of funding mechanisms;
positive environment for economic development; problem urea
indicators for the County; and the impact of Human Services sn
the quality of 1lie in Chesterfield County.
~cs. Lynne Cooper, Chairperson of the Kuman Services Coalition,
~ev~ewed the Coalltion's recommendations for action by tho
Board of Supervisors including collaboration b~twa~n aconomlc
development and human servioes; meeting challenges to the at-
risk population; the need for agency fl~×ibility; and
reaffirmation of the reciprooaI social contraGt.
It was agreed to adjourn to ~he regularly scheduled ~eard
meeting.
Reconvening:
Mr. James McKinnell gave the invocation.
Mi~s Dina Floyd, ~iss ~egan Disker~on, an~ ~i~ ~egan Ca~sy,
Team, le~ the ~ledge of Allegiance to the ~lag of the United
receive the resolutions.
On motion of the Board~ the following resolution was adopted:
Pittman, Jr., after twenty years of county service as P01ioe
to appoint a new Police chief as outlined in ~he county
candidates for appointment by the Board; end
WHEREAS, ~he County charter specifies that of the five
un~ appointed by ~he Board u£ Supervisors end one appointed by
Committee is tu have ~sllce experience; and
~udge of the Circuit Court as one citizen member on the Police
Chief selection Committee; Nr. David E. Johnsnn wa~ aDpofntn~
by the Board of Supervisors aa a second citizen member; and
Chesterfield County Police Department was appointed a~ th~
member with police exDerienoe; and
~/~/.;
96-365
WHEREAS, theso Committee mambsr~ devoted a great deal of
time and talent to the ~earch process which included developing
the overall s~proach and timetable; meeting ~ith munb~rs of
local and ~tata law enforcement, business, community
judges, and constitutional officers~ conducting public hearings
in the Magisterial Districts to receive citizen inputs and
W~EREAS, the valuable service of these Committee members
~xemplifies the ~est in citizen participa:ion and dedication to
duty and their efforts, slang with %hose of the other members
of the Cs~mittee, resul~e~ in the euc~ess of the national
~sarch to recommend the candidate from which th~ Board wa~ able
to appoint a new Police Chief.
NOW, THEREFOR= ~E IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of SnpeMviuors publicly reooqnizes and ex-pree~e~
its appr~=iation to Dr, Lowell H. Gilbert, Mr. David
Joh~so~ a~d D~tective Aaro~ ~. "Lo~ie" crt fur their
outstanding service ~u the citizens of Chesterfield County.
~D, ~ IT ~THER RESOLVED, that a COpy of this
County, virginia.
Vo~: Unanlmou~
~r. Danle~ pre~ent~d the exeouted resolutiohu to Dr. Gilbert,
Mr. Johnson, and Detective Or% and expressed appreclut~n,
Chiuf Selection Co~ittee. He =tared the Committee members did
14.B. RECOCNIZING DISTRICT ~IEF ~EOR~E ~. ~OND FOR
WHERE~$, District Chief George C. Pond served an District
Chief of Company 12, Ettriok Volunteer F~rs Department, from
WHEREAS, C~ief Pond ha= fr~ly given of his time since
joinin~ the Department i~ April~ 1957 and served in various
~an~ including Captain from 1975 to 1974 and Assistant Chia£
WHEREAS, c~ief Pond comes fro~ a long line sf family
members that have been activ~ in %he Ettrick Volunteer
Eanes,. donated land for the first fire station in the village
of Zttriok and wars instrumental in ~tartin~ the Ettrick-
Volunteer Fire Department in 19~8; Chi~f'Pond"s'father,~¥.'G~
the Ettrick ~ir~ Dspartmen~ and two uncles were also very
active officers and assisted i~ making the Ettrick Volunteer
Pire Departmen~ the fine opera=ion it is to~ay.
distinguished service of District Chief Georqs C. Pond and
Chesterfield County, their appreciation for thirty-nine years
of service to the County.
AND, bE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the= a copy of this
resolution b~ pre~ented to Chief Pond and that this resolution
be ~erwenently recorded swung the papers wf this Beard of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
]4rs. Humphrey and Mr. Rmmsey prssented the executed resolution
~ervice to Chesterfield County.
Mr. Hammer introduced Miss Megan WynneL~sswelI who was present
to receive the re~olution.
School; and
~ighth Crad~ ~p~lling Bee, and the ~aDchester Middle ~ehool
Spslllng Bee; and
WI~EREAS, ~egan was one of forty-five contestants in the
Chest~r£i~14 County Sp~lling B~ which ~he won on F~bruary
1996~ and
WHEREAS, Megan wen the Regional Spelling Bee sponsored
Dy the Richmond Times-Dispatch and held at tbs Arthur Ashe
Center on Ma~ch 31, 1996 with forty-four students participating
frow public school systews, private schools, and howe schcclin~
in Central Virginia; and
WKEREAS, ~egan participated through Round Three in
69th Annual Scrip~s Ecwar~ National Spelling bee in Washington,
the citizens of Chesterfield County and Central Virginin can
all bs proud and whose hi~h standards presen~ a challenge and
County boar~ o~ ~u~ervisors here~y congratulates M~s~ ~gan
Wynna Ls~well for her o~tstanding academic achievements ~nd
wishss hsr well in her future endeavors and acknowledges the
lady as one o~ its citizens.
permanently r~or~ed among the papers of this Board of
~f~t~
96-3~7
Humphrey Dreeented the executed reselutio~ to Miss
Lasswell, accompanied by her moth,r, grandfather, an~ the
CHIEF BRUCE V. VECCHIONI FOR HIS
Chief Eanes introduced Di~t~iet Chief Bruce V. v~ochionl who
was pre~ent to receive ~he remolutien.
On mo~ion uf the ~oard, =he following resolution was adopted:
WH~RF-%S, Disfric~ Chief Bruce V. Veochioni served as
District Chiaf Of Company s, Enon Volunteer Tire Department,
from January 1, 1985 to January 1~ 1~5; and
WHeReAS, un,er the direction cf Chief Ve~chic~i, Enon
Volunteer Fire Department began responding to~h~ergen=y ~dical
Service calls in th~ area; and
~=R~AS, Chief Vecchioni is the only Di~t~ict chief to
~EREAS, Chief V~cohioni has f~eely giv=n of hi~ time
~ince joining the Depart~unt in 1972 an~ served in variou~
ra~ including Liau~enan~ Captain, and Asuiutunt ~ief, and
h~s cuntinued to ~erv~ ~iligently as a Senior CaD%uin slnc~
d~mt~ngui~hed service of D~t~ict Chief Bruce V. Vecchioni an~
ex~ends, on behalf uf it~ members an~ the citizens of
~sterfield county~ =~uir appruciution for tweedy-four years
of service to th~ Coun=y.
resol~ion be permanently ~ecorde~ amen9 =he papers of this
Vote: Unanimous
an4 e~re~e~ a~Drecia~ion for hi~ distinguished uervi=e to
Chesterfield County.
14.H. RECOONIZtN~ MR. J~ME~ ~. H~LE FOR HIS DEDI~/~TED
TO ~IDLOT~I~/~ HIGH SCHOOL ~ ~HESTHP~FIELD COUNTY
~. Golden introduced Mr. J~s G. Hai~, Hidlo~hian ~i~ School
resolution~ He also rscognized~r;
Wi~tho~fft~ Principal; Mr, Jane C~a~dlur, Asuistant Principal;
meeting.
9B-368
611~196
on motion of ~he Boerd~ the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. James G. Hale has,'with excellence in music
~ducation and performance a~ hi~ goal, EUCCeEsfully guided the
band program at Midlothian High School as a teacher and band
director for thirty year~; add
W~EH~A$, ~r. Hale has been recognized by his students and
their families through the year~ of hi~ career a~ a dedicated
teacher who instills a love of music as well as a sense of
achi~¥em=nt, responsibility, and maturity in his band family;
and
W~g~Rg~S, Er. Bale ie ~ecegnized by hi~ colleagues as an
example e~ the finest of educators; and
WHF~REAS, Mr. Hale has directed~ Midlo~an High Sohool
~=rching/S~h~nic Band to an unprecedented ninth consecutive
yea~ a~ an Hono~ Band of Virginia, a distinction awarded by the
Virginia Band and Orchestra Directors' As~ociatlon base~ on th~
achievement of ~ Sup=riot r~ting at the Virginia Ban~ and
Orchestra Director=~ A=sociation Stat~ Hatching Band Feztlval
in ~e fall and at the District Band and Orchestra Festival in
~h~ spring o~ ~ch of ~h~ nin~ year~; an~
~=R~AS, Mr. Hale, through =he ~erio=n ~u~io Abroad
Program, each su~er afferds selected high school musicians ~
o~portunity to continue their musics1 growth while on a three
we~ %our of Europe; and
~EREAS~ Mr. Hale is a talented and respected %rc~onist
who plays professionnlly in the community and is ~n exemplary
citizen, m~ntor, and rol~ mod~l for ~u~i~ian~ throughout th~
~ommuni~y.
NOW~ THEREFORE BE IT ~SOLVED~ tha~ the chesterfield
for his thirty years of dedicated service to Midlothian High
School and his co,unity, as well as, for his ability to
inspire and challenge students to use their talents to con=inue
in their 9~rsuit of exce!lence in music education an4
perfo~an~ a~d to ~ake a co~itment to m~ic in their livem.
~D, DE IT r~ RESOLVED, that m copy of this
r~solution be presente~ ~o Mr. sale and~a= ~his resolution be
permanently ~eco~ded among thu puperu of this BOa~d Of
supervisors o~ chesterfield county, Virginia.
Ayes~ Hr. Daniel, Mr. Warren, Mr. Barber, and ~. MoKale.
Mr, Barber presented the executed resolution to Mr. ~ale,
accompanied by his wife, and expressed aDpre=iation fo~ his
dedicated semite to Midlo~ian High School and him co,unity.
Mr. Hale e~remsed appreciation for =he r~cognition and to the
lemdmrmhip at Midlothian Kith S~hool.
Mrs. Humphrey returned to ~e m~eting.
14.F. REOO~NIZIN~ ROBIOUS ~LEMENTA~y SCHOOL FIFTH G~ADB
STUDENTS FOR TEETH OUTST;~NDING REPR~ZE~T~IO~
Er, Golden introduced Mrs. Ro~a Noyes, Teacher, Mrs. JeAnn
Ams, Co-Teacher, and ~everal aoblous Elementary ~cbecl ~ifth
Grade students who were pre~ent to receive the resolutions.
611~1~
96-36~
On mstlen of the Bcard, the following reeoluti0~ was adopted:
~I4EREA$, the ~obicua Elementary School fifth grade
¢ollaboratlve class of Mrs. Rosa Noyes and eo-teacher~ Mrs.
JoAnR Arna~ e~tered a contest sponsored by the Society
Daughters of the American Revolution in the Group Special
Projects Catego~y~ and
W~EREAS, this class project was entered in the Junior
American Citizen's Contest whloh ~olSows the theme~ "Heritage
ef OuT Co,unity"; and
WI~EREAS, the entry by this fifth qrade collaberativ~
class of thirty ~tudents reeoived recognition at the local
level, qualifying it to comp~t~ in the State eompetiti0n~ an4
WHEREAS, the entry received first place in the S~ate of
Virginia a~d %~as sent to the Es=tern Divisional level which
included five states and Washington, D.C., where it was ~gain
awarded first ~lace and continued on to co,pete at the national
level; and
W~R~AS, ab the national level, this entry was a ~inner
end ranks ascend in the nation for Robieus Elementary School's
phetobook sad first in the nation for the School's video.
~0~, THEREFORE B~ I~ ~SOLV~D, ~hat t~e Che~terfleld
County Board of Supervieor~ extends its Congratulations to ~rs.
Rosa Noyes, Mrs. $oAnn Arns, and their fifth grade
collaborative class at Robious Elementary ~chool for their
participation an4 recognition in the Junior American Citizen's
Contest and for their out~tandinq representation of
Chesterfield County.
~%_ND, S= IT FURTHER RESOLED, that the Board of
supervisors acknOWledges the contributions of the Robious
~lementary school students who participated in the Contest and
to Mrs, Noyes and Mrs. Ams for their dedication to teaching.
vote: Unanimuus
H~. Barber presented the e×ecuted resolution~ to Mrs, Noye~
Mrs. Ams, a~d students, congratulated them on thei~
participation in the Junior American Citi~n~ Contest, and
wished ~hem well in their future endeavors.
14.~. RECO~NIZTN~ TKE ~99~ ~IDLOT~I~ ~IDDLE ~0HOOL LADY
MUSTANGS 80CCBR TE~ FOR THNIn OUTSTANDING
REgRE~ENT~TTON OF ¢~ESTERFIELD O0UNT¥
Mr. Golden introduced ~r. E~ie kobineun~ Couch, and ~iss Megan
Carney, Miee Dena Floyd; and ~i~s Magan Dicker~o~, Captains of
the Mi~lothian Hiddle School Lady ~ustang~ ~occer Team who were
pra~ent to ~eceive the resolutions.
On motion of the Board, the following ~esolution was adopted:
WHEREAS~ participatio~ in ~iddl= school sports has
b~ ~n integral part of Chesterfield county's educational,
phy~ioal, a~d e~otio~a! d=¥elopm=nt for students; and
WHEREAS, ~ir. Eric Robinson, Coach of the Midlo~an
of coaching for the past twenty-three year~; and
96-370
W~R~AS, under Mr. Robinson's guidance and direction~ thc
1096 Midlcthlan La~y Mustangs finished the regular season with
a 10-0-0 r~cord~ won the County. Tournament with a 13-0-0
record, end have scored 2,503 goals in the last three seasons;
and
W~ER~AS, the Midlothian Lady Mustangs have a four year
record of 51-8-1; and
WHEREAS, the captains of the Midlothian Lady Mustangs
Mi~ Megan "Barker" Carney, Mis~ Dena "Dent" Floyd", and Miss
Megan "C.G." Dickerson end thei~ tse~umatee -- Miss Elizabeth
IIR~ttig" Leslie; ~i~ Melitta "Erownter" Beck; Miss Sally
"Sauce" Linkenaugar; Miss Christine "Lea" Budlong"; Miss Lauren
"Ibe×" Weidnor; Mi~ Chrintin~ "Trite{{ ~chnu~an; Miss Alliso~
"Nadir" Dunning; Miss Jennifer "Juno" Sues; ~iss Je~y
Roberts; ~i~ Mallory "Rddy" ~arri~; Miss Katie "Kudu" Kelly;
Miss Erin "Stork" Crane; Miss Maggie "McGregor" Mroczkowski;
Miss Stacey "Batten" Pavlak; Ziss Allison "Yikes" Swarm;
C~meron "Che~" Pritchard; Miss Laura "Aegir" Hall;
."Nosy" Boardway; Miss Ashley "Gidget" Delans; Miss Amy "Mask"
Mi~ Cami "~t~ B~ran; ~imm ~anda "Kuggetm" Clark; and ~iss
Afar "Jest" Salem have remained undefeated for the pa~t four
County Beard of Supe~v~o~ hereby co~end~ the 1996 M~dlothlan
~D, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, =hat the Board of
Sup~visors, on b~alf of the citizens of Chesterfield County,
hereby e~resses their best wishes for continued success to the
Midlothian Lady Mustangs.
Vote: Unanimous
Miss Carney, Miss Floyd, and Miss Dickerson, congratulated them
their future endeavors.
~. Robinson expressed appreciation for the recognition and
noted several members o~ ~h~ Team will ~e appearing on
cover of the July ~ssue of ~e Chesterfield ~ress ~agazine and
Miss Carney, Sims Floyd, an~ Miss Di~erson
appreciation to Mr. Robinson for his leadership as a Coach and
for being a ~riend.
Mr. Bar,er excused himself f~om th~ meeting.
RECOGNITION OF TEE COUNTY,S RECEIP~ OF THE VIRGINI~
MERITORIOUS PROFESSIONAL BL~2~NI,N~_A~AR~
Mr. Jaosb~o~ i~trodueed Mr. K=lly Miller~ Planning
Commissioner; Ms. Helen Bailey; Mr. Alan
Blaloc~; MO. Charles Coker; Mr. Dick Collier; ~r. Mike Crea~y;
Hr. Paul Grasewicz; Me. Nayota Gusler~ ~r. Jim Rogimb~l; Mr.
Jehu Siebert; Mr. Bill Walton; and ~. ~iok White; who were
present to receive tbs resolutions. He also introduced key
County staff member~ who participated in the preparation of the
Route 3~0 Corridor Plan. He noted Mr. Russell J. Gulley,
96-371
Planning Co~mi$$ioner, was unable to attend the meeting due to
a death an his family.
on motion of the Board~ %he following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Virginia Chapter of the American Planning
Association has honored Chesterfield County with its
Meritorious PEofessionai Planning Award for the Route 360
corridor Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Association stated that the PlaD was
~e0gnized for it~ "Integration of market feasibility
design standards to strengthen the sustainability and market
appeal of the ~uburba~ ¢c~%m~nity that makes up Route Z6Q"; and
W~ER~AS, The ~onorable Harry G. Daniel and The Honorable
Russell J. Gulley and ~. Kelly Miller, Planning commission
members, provided visionary and effective l~ership in the
development of ~he Plan; and
~=AS, business lea~ers, civic laad~r~, property
ownar~, and citizens Joined together to actively participate
~S, many citizens helped ~haDe ~e Plan and the
f01]owing permons were a~pecially involved and critical to the
~uccems of the Plan: ~s. Helen Bail~y, Mr. Alan Barnem, Mr. Ken
Blalock, Mr. Charl~m Cok~, Mr. Dick Collimr, ~. ~ike
Mr. ~aul Gra=ewicz, MS. Nayota G~i~r~ ~. Jim Regimbui,
John Si~be~t, Mr. Bill Walton, and Mr. Dick ~it~; and
potential; an~
~EREAM~ special design standards were adopted which will
reslden%ial neighborhoods and bumlnems areas mhd will
a special fuuum an~ immge for the entire oo~unity,
NOW, TKE~FORE BE IT RESOLVED~ that the Chmsterfield
County Board of Supe~imors hereby acclaims the ~igh quality
work of th~ 360 Corridor civic an~ business leaders and
Corridor Plan~
~ BE IT F~ER RESOLVED, ~at t~e Board publicly
~al~ty profe~mional, work and ~ec~ipt of th~ Meritoriou~
~rofe~iona! ~lanning Award from the virginia Chapter of the
~erican Planning Association.
~sent: ~r. ~arb~r.
~z. Daniel expresse~ apprmcia~ion to each of ~he participants
for their dedicated efforts in d~veloping the Plan and state~'
this is a ~r~mendous honor for Chesterfield Coun~y.
~. Warren ~xpr~sed a~Drmciation to the paTti~ipan~s for their
hard work and stated development cf the Plan is a good
%he Board of $upervisor~, co~unlty a~oclatio~$, and
bu~ines~ Density. He stated the Board is proud of the
success of the Plan and look f~rward t0 it~ implementation.
96~372
Mr. Daniel and Mr. Warren pre,eared the executed resolutie~ to
Mr. Kolly, Ks. Bailey, Mr. Barnes, Mr. ~lalock,
Collier, ~r. Cressy, Mr. Grasewicz, Ms. Susler, Mr. Regimbal,
Mr. slehert, Mr. Walton, and Mr. Whi~e.
Mr, Alan Barrio axpresoed a~proeiaflen, on bshsl~
participants, to }Ir. Daniel, Mr. Warren, ~r. Gulley, and Mr.
Miller, for the recognition fo~ their foresight and vision of
thm Plan.
Mr. Barber returned to the meeting.
aP OHE~TERPIE~D. 19~8. A~ ~ENDED. ~Y ~DING
CONDITIONS OF WEEDRr SHRUBBERYr TREEB ~N_D OTHER
VE~ETATXON ~ENB~ALLY
}tO. Jeffrey Mi~cks, Assistant County Attorney, stated this date
and time has been advertised for a public hearing to oon~ider
an ordinanae r~lating to unlawful conditlon~ of weeds,
shrubbery, trees and other YegetaCion generally.
Mr. George Beadles stated he feels the Board should not adoDt
the propo~d ordinanco at this ti~e and that the criminal
There being ~o one else to address this 0~dinance, the pnbl~
hearing was closed.
On motlun e~ ~r. McHale, ssusnded by ~rs. Humphrey, the Board
edop~ed the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF T~E COUNTY
DF CHESTERFIELD. 197~, A~ AMENDED, B~ AMh/~DI~G
AND REENACTING SECTION 10-19.1 RELATING TO
UNLAWFUL CONDITIONS DF NEEDS, SHRUBBERY, TREES AND OTHER
VEGETATION GENERALLY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of ~upervisors of
Che~torfield County:
(1) That ~eetion 10-19.1 of the Code of the County
of Chesterfield, 197R, as amended, ~ amended and reenacted to
Sec. 10-19.1. Unlawful ~ondit~ono of~w~d~ra~, sh~bbel-v.
t~ees, and other veqetatlon generally.
(a) (1) It shell be ~nlawful for the owner of any vacant
which b~ildings or other improvements are located, within the
boundaries of blabbed subdivisions or any other areas zoned for
residential, business, co~ercial or industrial u~e in th~
county ~o pe~it to ~e~ai~ thereon, any grass~ weeds, brush or
ether uncontrolled vegetation in excess of eighteen (18) inches
in height.
(2) It s~all I~l~c~er be unlawful ~sr the owner of any lot
Or parcel of land to permit to grow er remain thereon any
hedge, s~b, t~se or ut--her ve~statlsn, the limbs, breaches or
other putts of which overhang, extend or protrude into any
street, sidewalk or public alloy in a manner which obstrusts or
impedes the safe and orderly movement of persons or vehicles
thereon, er in ~he ease of trace, when th~ d~a~ li~6b~ or
branches thereof are likely to fall into or across such street
or sidewalk, thereby endangering ~uch pero0n~ end vehi01~s.
6/12/96
(3) Upon remedying any such unlawful condition, the
owner shall dispose of such vegetation in such a manner as to
el£nlnate any ~otentlal fire hazard.
(b) Whenever the ceunt¥ admini~trator~ o~ the official
designated by him, has determined by reports, inspections
otherwise, that any such unlawful condition in fact mxists, he
shall notify the owner of the land upon whioh the violation
exists to cut or cause to be cut the grass, weeds, brush or
other uncontrolled vegetation within such reasonable time as is
specified in the notice. Such notice shall be in w~iting,
~hall he delivered by hand or mailed tc hhe last known address
of the owner and shall be complied with by such owner.
If such g~5~s, weeds, brush or oth~r uscontrclled
vegetarian are not cut within the required time~ the county
official designated by the county administrator shall cause
them to be cut and the cosec and exDsnses thereof, including an
administrative handling charge of thirty-five dollars ($)5.00),
shall be billed to ~he property ewner and if not paid shall be
added to and collected in the sa~e manner as the real estate
tax on such 9roperty. T~e coun=y administrator or his designee
shall certify the costs and expenses to the treasurer
county, w~o shall ¢ollec~ aush ameunt; and if such amount shall
remain unpaid for a period of sixty (~0) days, then the
treasurer cf the county ~hali certify ~ueh cha~ges as b~ing
unpaid to the clerk of the circuit court of the county, W~O
shall maintain a record book of such delinquent comt~ and
expenses on file in th~ records of the clerk's office. Every
charge authorized by this section as a ~euult of a violation of
paragraph (a)(~) with which the owner and lien helder of any
ouch property shall have been assessed end which ~emains Unpaid
=hall conctitute a lien against ~ueh proper~y ranking on a
parity with liens for unpaid local taxes and shall be
of Chapter ~9 of Title 58.1 of the Code Of Virginia, as
(c) Any owner who violates sec. 10-19.1 (a)(1) shall be
9~/ilty of a Clas~ 4 misdemeanor.
That this ordinanc~ shall become
immediately upon adoDtion.
Vote: Unanimous
TO D~O~E~ ~D~DS ~ ~EOUIR~T8
~. W~lkiam Peele, Assistant Director of Plan~ing, stated this
date and tim~ ha~ been advertised for a Dublio hearing
consider an ordinance relating to modifications to
~. George Be~dle~ ~ated h~ feels if a development standard
in ~lace everyon~ ~ho~ld have to comply with
Ther~ being no one else ~o address this ordinance, the public
hearing wa~ closed.
96-374
adopted the following s~dinance~
chesterfield County:
(1) That section 21.1-12.1 of tho Code of the
Sec. 21.1-12.1. Planning commission may orant modifications to
(a) Except for those d~v~lopment standards or
requirements whish must be mcdifisd by the ~rantlng of a
variance, a conditional use or a rezoning, the planning
commission may grant modifications, with or without conditions,
to development standards or requirements specified in this
chap=er. The planning sommission shall fir a r6asonable =i~e
forths hearing of an application under this section and decide
'the same within sixty (60) days.
(b) No modification to s devele~n~n~ standard or
requirement shall be authorized by the planning co~unission
unless it considers and ~etermine~ substantial compliance with
shallowness~ size or shape of thc specific
reason of exceptional topographic conditions er
other exceptional ~ituation or condition
application of the terms of this chapter would
effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict
th~ u~e of th~ property.
(2) The granting of such modification will
alleviate a clearly demenetrable hard~hip am
distinguished from a special privilege or
generally by o~her prspar~ie~ in =ne =amc
~oning district and the same vicinity.
(3) Th= modification will not be injurious to thc
use and enje~rment of adjacent property ewners;
will net diminish or impair property values
within the neighborhood; will not shange the
character of the district; and will not be
detrimental to or endanger th~ ~ublic health,
safety, or general welfare.
(4) The condition or situation of t~e property
concerned or the intended ~se of ~e pro~erty
to mak~ r~a$onmbly prao=ioable ~e formulation
Th~ ~an~ing of such modification will allow
the project to comply with the adopted
COmpreh~nsiv~ Plan.
96-~75
(c) In authorizing a modification, the planning
commission may impose conditions regarding the location,
character and othe~ f~ature~ of thm proposed structure or u~
as it may deem necessary to tbs public interest; and it may
regui~e a guarantee or bond to remain in effect until
compliance with such c0ndi~iens has been met.
(d) The planning commission shall not grant more than
mlnimu~ necessary modification to the appropriate development
s%andar~ or repuirsmsnt to resolve the hardship. Th= planning
co~i~sion shall not grant a permanent modification to a
standard er requirement if a te~p0ra~ modification will
suffice. A t~mporary modification may be granted if =he
planning commission determines that permanent ~o~pliance will
b~ obtained in a future phase of development.
(e) The planning c0~mi~ion shall not grant a
modification to any development standard or requirement if:
(1) The granting of the modification will
constitute the granting of a variancs~ special
exception~ CO~ditiunal u~e or a reaching.
O~dinar~ financial consid~ratlons are the
~rlnclpal reason for t~e r~quested
modification.
(3} The modification amend~ a property-specific
condition impo~ed by the board of SUpervisors
or the board of zoning appeals unless such
condition specifically grants much aodification
authorit~ to tbs planning cor~mission.
(4} The applioan~ created the condition or
situation generating the need for the
modification and the applicant has not
exhausted all cthe~ practicable sclutionm to
the problem, including but not limited to the
acquisition of additional property, the
elimination or redesign of structures, or the
reduction of development density.
(f] In the event the applicant disagrees with the final
decision of the planning commission, he may file s written
appeal with the circuit court within sixty (60) days of that
decision. Tn addition, adjaoen~ proper~y owners may appeal the
final decision of the planning do~misuion by filing a written
appeal with the circuit court'within'sixty .(60)- ~ays,of the=
decision. Adjacent p~oDe~ty owners? appemlm shall be limited
CO ¢onditionm whish directly affect the property ownsrs and
include access, ~tility locations, buffers, conditions of
zoning, architectural treatmsnt, and land use transitions. The
court shall fix a reasonable time for hearing of the appeal.
During this perio~ the ~irs:=sr of planning shall not approve
any applicable ~ite plan, building per~it or record plat.
(2] This ordinance ~hall b~eome effective i~mediately
upon adoption.
¥ots: Unanim0u~
96-37~
TO CONEIDEB A~ AMENDMENT TO THB F¥95-96 BUDGET TO
TRANSPORTATION REIMBURGEMENTE FOR T~E ~A~MELE¥
BOULEV~RDINE~BY~S BRIDGE ROAD INTERSECTION PR~ECT
Mr. sttth s~ateQ this date and ti~s ha~ been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an amendment to the TY95-9~ Budget
to appropriate $56~,000 in virginia Department cf
Transportation reimbursements for the Walmsley Boulevard/
Newby'e Bridge Road Inter~ection Project.
Mr. George Beadle~ ~ta~ed that he ~upport~ the improvements to
Newby~ Bridge Road and hopes all sections of Newby~s B~idge
Rca~ will come forward in =he future for repair.
There bein~ no one else to address this issue, the public
hearing was closed.
On motion of ~r. Warren, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
appropriated Ss6o~o00 in anticipa%ad virginia Department of
Transportation reimbursements for the Walmslay Boulevard!
Administrator to enter into a Virginia Department of
Transportation/coun%y d~sign/right-of-way acqeisition~
construction agreement, acceptable to the County ~ttorney, for
"the Project; and authorized staff to acquire right-of-way for
the project by conde~L~ation~ if neceE~ary.
Vote: Unanimou~
15.D. TO CONSIDER;~NGRDIN~N~E TO.MEND T~E ~OSB OP THE COUNTY
OF CKESTEBFiELDo X978, AB ~/~END~D, BY ~/~ENDING ~ND
ADDING SECTION 7.1-~ RELATING TO PRECINCT BOUND~i~IEE~/~D
POLLIN~ PL~eES
Mr. Minoks state~ ~hi~ date and ti~ has haan advar~i~e~ for a
public hearing ~o consider an ordinance relating to precinct
of four new polling plaoes and the relocation of two previous
F~. Warren has requested that the change in the Clover Hill
repasted that the Roblous precinct polling place not be moved
d~sire of ~ ~oard, those changes would be deleted from ~e
~honld be located at County libraries and requested the Board
li~a~.
There being no on~ ~l~e to addrems this ordinance, the public
hearing was ~los~d.
~. Warren stated hi~ 9u~o~e of deferring the polling 91ace
ohan~e in t~e C10ve~ Hill District iu to ullow mcr= involvement
from the co.unity and t~at ~e will be huldlng a co=unity
Mr. Barber sba%ed he hu~ spoken wi~ Mr. ~a~ and he aqre~d to
ensure conven~emc~ of County voters.
95-377
Mr. McHale stated he feels the timing is appropriate for the
polling pre,inch changes and that he supports the
recommendation of staff.
Hrs. Eumphrey stated she feels the Dee~ Run precinct polling
place needs to be moved and supports the roco~endation of
staff for the change in the Deer Run precinct. She further
mtated Wint~rpock is one oft he largest precincts iht he County
and that she oupperts Alberta Smith ~lementary School as a
polling precinct.
l(x. Daniel stated the mc%ion would be approving the polling
precinct changes for Bermuda and Matoaca Districts and would
defer the polling precinct changes for Clover Rill and
~idlothian Diztrict~, wit~ the exception of the mtreet changes
which would remain incorporated in the ordinance.
On me,ion of Mr. Warren, seoonde~ by ~r. Barber~ the Board
adopted the fOllOWing ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO ~2K~ND T~ ~.OF THE COUNTY
DF CHESTERFIELD, 197S, AS ~ENDED, BY A~ENDINS
PRECINCT BOUNDARIES AND POLLING PLACES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Boa~d of Supervisors of
Chesterfiel~ County:
(1) That Suction 7.~ of the Code of the County o~
Chesterfield, 1978~ as amended, is amended und reenacted to
read a= follow~:
~ec. 7.1-~. ~recinct bo=ndariee and Dollin~ ~laces.
The follewlng shall be th~ precinct boundaries and pollin~
places for magisterial districts i~ the county:
BERMUDA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
EcOff Voting Precinct:
Commencing at the point wh~re the center line of Iron Bridge
Road (state Reu~e 10} i~ter~e~ts the osn~ar line of Chalkley
Road (State Route 63~}; thenc~ northwardly alon~ tho
llne of Chalkley Road (~ate Rout~ 632) to its inter~ec~ion
with Centralia Road (State Route 145; continuing.as
717); thence eastwardly along the center line of centralia Road
(State Route 145, continuing as Stat~ Route 717) to its
intersec=~on wi=R Old Ce~ralia Road (state Route 609); thence
soethWardly along the center line of 01~ Centralia Road (State
Routs 609} to its i~er~eotion wits West H~dred Road (State
Route 10); thence westwardly along the center line c~
5undrad Road (State Route 10) to its intersection with
~arrowg~t$ Road (State Route 144); thence northwardly along the
center line of Narrowgate Road (State Route 14a) to its
intersection with Happy ~ill Road (Stale ~oute 619}; thence
westwardly along the center line of Happy Rill Rued (Stute
Route 619) to its intersection with Branders-~r~dge~Roa~(State
Route 625); thence northwestwardly along the Center line of
Branders Brldg~ Road (State Route ~2~) to its inter~eotion wi~h
Iron srid~e Road (state Route 10)~ thence wcstwardty along the
center line o~ Iron sridge Road (state Route lQ) to its
intersection wit~ Chalkley Road (State Route 632), the point
and place of beginning.
The voting place Sot =calf Voting ~rasinot mhatl be Eooff
Elementary ~chool, ~200 Ecoff Avenue.
96-378
61~196
Dutch Gap Voting Preslnct:
c~mmen~ing at the point where the oetts~ line of Proctcr'~
Creek intersects the boundary line between Henrico County and
Chesterfield Ccunty~ thence alotg said Boundary line as it
meandarg eastwardly with the Jame~ River to its intersection
with U.S. Interstate 295; thence seuthwardly along ~he center
li~e Of U.S. IRterstate ~9~ to ~t~ ~ntersectlon with Enon
center line of Rnon Church Road [~tat~ Route 7~) to its
~ntersection with the Seaboard Air Line Railroad right-of-way;
thence northwardly and w~$twa~dly along the Renter line of ~ald
right-of-way to its intersection with the Seaboard Coast Line
Railroad rlgh%-of-way; thence wwstwardly ~long the center line
of this right-of-way to its intersection with Ramblewood Drive
(~tate Route 617); thence southeastwardly along the center llne
of Ra~blewood Drive (State Route 617] to its intersection wit~
Rebel Ridg~ Road ($tat~ Route 1093)~ thence westwardly along
tbs center line of Rebel Ridge Road (State Route 1093} to its
intersection with walthall Driv~ (~ta~e ~oute I090); thence
southwardly along Walthall Drive (State Route 10~0) to its
intermectioe with Ruffle Mill Road ($~ate Route 746); thence
southeastwardly along the seater line of Raffia Mill Road
along the center line of A~hton Creek a~ it meander~ westwardly
to it~ intersection with ~.~. Inter~tate 95
(Richmond-Petersburg Turnpike); thence northwardly along the
centez line e~ U.S. Interstate 95 (Richmond-Petersburg
Turnpike} to its intersection with Proctor's Creek; thence
eastwardly along the center line of ?reefer's Cree~ ~o it
intersection with the boundary line between ~enrico County und
chesterfield county, the point and place of beginning.
The votin~ DSacs for Dutch GaD Voting D~ecinct shall
Margaurite Christian Elementary School, 1A801 Woods Edge Road.
Iron Bridge Voting Precinct:
Conu~encing at the point where the center line cf Iron
Brldg~ Road (State Route 10) intersects ~s center line
center lite of Centralia Road (State Route 145) to its
inter,action with Chalkley Road (State Route 632); ~ence
southwardly along the cant~r line of Chalktey Road (State Rou~
65~) to it~ inter~ection with Iron ~ridge Road (State Route
10); thence we~twardly and northwardly alonq the center line of
Iron Bridge Read (State Route 10) to i~s inter-action with
C~ntralia Read (State Route 1~5)~ th~ point and pla~e
The voting plac~ for Iron Brid~ Voting ~r~cinct shall
Ca,var Middle School, 12400 Branders Bridge Road.
o o o
DISTRICT
o o o
winterpock voting Precinct:
Co~enci~g at the point where the center line of U.S. Route 360
(~=11 Street Road) intersects th~ boutdary line between
Chesterfield County and Amelia County as said line follows the
A~Domattox River ~n a southeast~a~dly direction to its
intersection with the western line of Rooning Creek as flooded
by Lake Cho~din; thence northwardly along the western line of
Nooning Creek and then along the center line of Nconlng Creek;
~Benco continuing no:thward]y lo~vin~ Nooning Cree~ to the
southern terminus of Second Branch Road (State Rou~e 655);
~hencc northwardly alon~ ~he center line cz second Branch Road
(State Route 653) to its intersection with ~eaoh Road (State
Route 655); thone~ westwardly along t~e center lin~ of Beach
Road (State Rout~ 6~$) to its intersection wihh Baldwin Cre~k
Road (State Routs 730); thence northwardly along the center
intersection wi~h U.S. Routs ~60 (~11 Street Road); thence
we~twardiy along the center linc of U.S. Routs 360 (Hull street
Road) to its intersection with the boundary line between
Chesterfiel~ County and Amelia County, the point and place Of
beginning.
The voting place for Winte~pock voting Precinct shell be Bothia
sailey Bridge voting Precinct:
Commencing ~t the point whore the center line of swift Creek
oouthwestwardly along the center line of Bailey Bridg~ Road
(stere Route 654) to itm intersection with Spring Run Read
(State Routs 65~); thence eastwardly along the center line of
Spring Run Road (State Route 6S4) to its intersection with
Nen~l~y R~ad (state Route 659); thence mouthw~stwardly elong
the center lido of Hensley Road (~tate Routs 6S9) to its
interseotlon with Beach Road (State Route 655); thence
eastwardly along the center llne cf Beach Road (State Route
655) to its intersection with Quells Road (Stat~ Ro~t~ 653);
thence northeastwardly along %he cmn=er iin~ cf Quells Road
(State Ronto 653) to its intersection with Swift Creek; thence
following Swift Creek as it meanders in a weetwardly direction
to its intersection with Bailey Bridge Road (State Route 654)
the point and place of beginning.
The voting place for Bailey ~ridse voting Precinct shall be
Bailey Bridge Middle School, 12E01 Bailey Bridg~ Road.
D~er RUn Votin9 Precinct:
Commencing ut the point where the centerline of Baldwin
Creek Road (State Route 730) intermeots the center line of
Route 360 (Hull Street Road); thence ~amtwardly along the
center line o~ u.s. Rou~e 3~0 (Hull street Road) to itm
intersection with swift Cre~k; thence $cuthwardly along the
center line c~ swift Cro~k %0 igs intersection with Spring Run
CD~eE; thence along thm center line of Spring Run Creek as
meanders so~thwardly to its intersection with North Spring Run
R~ad (State Route 654); thence eastwardly along the cco~er line
of North spring Run (State Route 654) to its interoocticn with
Spring Run Road (State Route 562); thence eastwardly along the
center line of Spring Run Road (state Route 662) to its
intersection with Hensley Road (State Route' 659')';' themce
zcuthwe~twardly along the center line of Hensley Road (State
Route 659) to it= intersection with Beach Road (state Route
655}; thence westwardly along t~e oente~ linc of Heuch Road
(State Route 65~) to its intersection with Baldwin creek Road
(State Route 730); thence northwardly along the center line of
Baldwin Cre~k Read (s~ate Route 730) to its intersection with
U.S. Route 360 (Hull Street Reed), the point and place of
beginning.
96-$80
The voting place for Deer Run voting Precinct shall be
Clover ~ill ~ibrary, 670~ Deer R~n Dr~v~.
Spring Run Voting Precinct:
Commencing ut the point where thc cent=r line of Sprinq
Run creek intersects Swift Creek; thence eastwardly along the
center line of Swift Creek to its intersection with Bailey
Bridge Road (state Route 654}: thence southwardly along the
center line of Bailey Bridge Road I~tata Route ~54) to its
intersection wi~h sp~ing Run Road (State Route 654): ~hence
northwe~twardly along the center line of Spring Run Rcad (State
Route 654) te its intersection with North SDring Run Roa~
(Rtat~ Rout~ 6S~); thence northwardly along the center line of
North Spring Run Road (State Routs 662) to i~s intersection
with Spring Run Creek; thence northeastwardly along the center
line of said creek to its intersection with Swift C~eek, the
point and place of beginning.
The voting place for Spring Run voting Precinct shall be
Alberta smith Elementary school~ 132Q0 ~siley ~ridge Road.
HIDLDTHIkN ~4A~ISTERIAL DISTRICT
Co--eating at the point where the center lin~ of ~alisbury Road
(-~tate Route 902) intersects th~ center llne of Rcbieus Read
(Stat~ Rout~ g~); th~nc~ in a northw~twardly direction for
approximately 1~ 015 feet to an intersection with ~h~ t~rminus
of Gray Oaks Lane; thence northwestwardly along the center line
of Gray Oaks Lane to its intersection with Powderh~ Lane~
th~no~ along the center line of Powderham Lane to i%~ ~erminu~;
thence continuing in a straight line for approximately 90 feet
to an intersection with Twin Team Lane; thence along the center
line of ~in Te~ Lane to its terminus; thence continuing in a
interme~tion with Robiou~ Read (State Route 711); thence
nor~wes~wardly along the center line of Robious Road
R~ute 711) to its intersection with the boundary line between
chesterfield county and Powha%an coon%y; %hence along such
boundary line to itu intersection With tho bounda~ line
between ches=erfield coun=y and ~enrico County; thence
eastwardly along such boundary line to its intersection wit~
the boundary line between Chesterfield County and the City of
Richmond; thence southwardly along such boundary line to
8~5); thence no~eastwardly along the center line of Big Oak
Lane (State Route Sl~) to its in=~rsection wi=h Castlestone
with Castle Hill Road (State Route 40Sl);
northwestwardly along the canter line of Castle Hill Road
(state Route 4081) to it~ intersection wit~ Robiou~
Driv$ (State ~oute ~3=)~ thence sou~wardly along ~e cen~er
line of Robious crossinq D~ive (state Route 83Z) to itu
interseotion with ~olo Parkway; thence southwardly along the
cente~ li~e of Polo Parkway to its intersection with Robious
l~ne of Robious Road (State Route 711) to its intersection wi~
beq~ing.
The voting place for Robious Votin~ ~recinot shall be Roblous
Elementary schscl, 2801 Robious Crossing Drive.
(Z) That this o~dinanoe shall .become effective
i~ediately upon adoption.
Vote: Unanimous
1S.E. ~O_~ONSID~R AN ORDINaNCE TO~f3TEE CODE OF THE
~r. Jacobson stated this date and tlm~ h~ been advertised for
agriQultural di~tric~ red,red conditions. He noted the
Planning Cotillion held ~ public hearing on the ordinance and
Di~t~ict which would benefit from adoption of the
There being no one s]se to address this ordlnan~, the p~blic
On mo%ion of Mrs. H~Dhrey, seconded by Mr. Ba~be~, th~
Che~terfi~l~ County:
~at ~ction 21.1-129 of =hs Code ~f.~he County
read ag follows:
District.
District.
(b) Front Ya~dz ~ach lot uhall hgve a front yard havln~ a depth
of not less than cna hundred fifty (150) feet.
(d) Corner Side Yard: game a~ specified for R-SS District.
(e) Rear Yard: S~ as speGified for R-8~ District.
(f) Required Lot Ar$~; gash primary structure, t~a~har with
lot having an area of not less than forty-thr== thousand five
h~dred sixty (43,560) s~are feet and a width of Rot leus than
one h~dred fifty (~0) f~et.
(g) ~xe~tions: (i) The requlr~ents of ~is SesSion shall not
apply to any lot of ~eoo~d C~euted prior to May ~6, 19~8. Lots
of eec=ion ~l.l-7o, except that each lot ~hall have a £ro~t
yard having a depth of not less than cue hundred (10D} feet.
{ii) The front~ oide~ corner and tsar yard requirements of this
section shall not apply when n variance ham been granted
authorizing a dwelling on a lot without public road frontage or
when the exi~tlng dwelling was constructed on a lot without
public road frontage prior to the April 28, 1976 rs~uirement
for public road frontage. Lots exempted by this sub~ction
shall comply with the front, side, corner and roar yard
requirements of section 21.1-70. (iii) Any addition to a
primary structure shall be set back from the ultimate right of
way at least the same distance as the primary structur~ ur the
required front yard setback whichever ie lees. In the event
that tho primary structure is sat back less than forty
feet from the ultimata right of way, then the addition shall be
required to bo set back at least forty (40) feet from the
ultimate right of way.
(2) That this ordinance shall become effectivs i~edia=oly
upon adoption.
Vote: Unanlm~us
~DMINI~T~TIV~ V~RIAN~E~
Hr, ~acobson s=ated thio date and time has been advertioed for
a public hearing to consider an ordinacne relating to
administrative variances. He stated the advantage of the
ordinanc~ is a customer service =dvantage as it allows the
Planning Department to approve variances in a much shorter
Appeals procmss. He noted the Plannln~ Co~isslon and Board of
Zoning Appeals support the ordinance.
~. George Beadles expressed concerns relative to the reduction
O~ ~ases b~in9 hear~ by the Planning Go~iasfon an~ t~ Board
of Zoning Appeals and stated that h~ feels there should be
ty~e of l~mit plac~d on what oases can be approve~ by the
Planning Director.
~ere being no one el~e to address this ordinance, the public
Mr. Barber ~tated he s~pport$ the proposed ordinance and
~e ordinance allown for ~rv~ce %o
Boar~ to a~op~ the following ordinance:
AN ORDIN~CE TO ~D THE CODE OF THE CO~TY
OF C~ST~FT~ 197~, ~S ~DED, DY ~DING
RE~TING TO ADMINIST~TIVE
Cmunty:
(1} That Se=rich 21.1-15.1 of the Code of the Count~
of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted
(a) At the time an application is submitted, the
applicant shall elect whether to eemk an administrative
variance as sst £erth An section 21.1-14 of this chapter. If
the applicant fails ts make such an election, his application
will be processed under ~he procedurn net forth in thin
section.
(bi T~ director of planning may grant an administrative
variance from any building setback requirement contained in
thio chapter. No such administrative varianne 'shall be
authorized by the d~reotor ef planning unless he makes the
following finding~ in writing:
(1) That the strict application of the
(2) Thnt each hardship is not shared generally
by other properties in the same zoning dis~ric~ and the name
vicinity; and
(3) That %h~ authorization o~
~dministrativ~ variance will no~ be cf eub~nantial detriment to
ad, meant property and that the chArActer of the ~oning
will not be changed by the ~ranting of the administrative
(c) Any application for an administrative variance
described in t~is s~e~ion shall be made in accordance with the
pro~isions of ~ection
leant fourteen (14) days before acting on any application made
pursuant to thi~ ~eetio~, pOSt on the land ar buildlng involved
a nctiue sf the appl{~ation as follows:
(1) The notice oholl he posted at reasonable
intervals along streets abutting the subject p~Operty or, if
(2) The validity of any action cn an
application shall not be affected by the unauthorized removal
(e) The director o£ planning or his aqent $~all send
to adjacent property owners by registered, certified or first
is mailed. The notice shall specify that t~e director of
planning will approve o~ disapprove the application n~t
than twenty-one (21) days after ~e date of notice. If
written notice iE p~ovid=d by first class mail, the director of
planning or his agent shall make affidavit the= su~hnotioe has
been sent and shall file guch affidavit with thm'application~
(f) If any adjacent property owner obj$cte
application, in writing, Drier to the date the director of
planning ren~ers the decision on th~ application, the
application shall be transferred to the board of zoning appeals
for a decision.
(g) The director of plan~ing shall approve or disapprove
6/12/96
96-384
twenty-one (~) daym after the date of notice of the
application.
(h) Any appeal of the final decision of the d~reetor cf
planning on an application for an admlnlstretive variance shall
bo ~ade to the board of ~onin~ appeals of the county ~ursuant
to ~
~%at ~ction ~l.l-~l of the Code cf.~he ~ountv
of Chesterfield~ 1978, e~ emended, is amended end ~ee~aoted te
re~d a~ follows:
Section 21.1-~81. Deflni%ion~.
For the ~urpeses of this chapter, the following word~ an4
ph~ase~ shall have the meanings respectively aocribed to them
by this section:
o 0 o
variance, Administrative: k variance frsmany building
setbask requirement which may be granted by ~he di~eeto~ cf
plan~inq with the following re~tr~otfons:
(i) the amount e~ the v~riaDee ~hall b~ lf~t~d to a
ma~im~m of ten (10) f~et or fifty (5~) ps,cent of the required
s~tback, whichever is greater, and
(2) t. he director es planning must Sind in writieg ~ha~:
a. the stric~ application s~ the ordinance
requirement would produce undue hardship~
b. such hardship is not shared generally by
othe~ prspemties in the same zoning district
and the same vicinity; and
e. the authorization of each variance will not
~e o£ substantial detriment to adjacent
property~ and the character of the zoning
district will nut ~e changed ~y the granting of
(3) That this
immediately upon adoption.
vote: Unanimous
o o o
ordinance shall become effective
~..~..__,~,~ONSTD~R AN ORDINANCE ~RA~TIN~ PANTI~L R~L ~STATE
RENOVATED RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES
~. Miee~ ~tated thi~ date an~ tim~ h~ been adv~rti~e~ for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to the partial
~emption from real e~tate taxation of certain rehabilitated,
renovated or replaced residential ~tructu~es. HQ fu~the~
sta~ed the exemption is only available for residential
urea. Ne stmted th~ ordinance would apply to single and multi-
I~mily residential s=rustures and provide a tax exemption for
ho~e. Ke noted the program would end th~ year ~00I.
Mr. Dodd stated he £eels adoption of the ordinance would
enhance property valuem throughout the entire County.
There being no one else to address this ordinance, the public
hearing wee oloead.
~r. Daniel stated =hat the County has take~ positive step~ on
other issues to enhan¢~ ~oonomic development and dev~loRmen%
and that he feel~ the ordinance has general applicability and
can be applied County-wide. He further stated he feels
adoption of the ordinance will be good for the County at-large.
On ~e~ian of Mr. McHale, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
A~ ORDINANC~ TO ~2~ENE T~E CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELd, 1978, AS A~ND~, BY AM~NDIN~
ARTIC~ XIiI O~ CHAPTE~ ~ TO ADD A NEW SECTION 8-59.2
RELATING TO THE PARTIAL E×~M~TION FR0~ R~AL ~STATE TAXATION
O~ C~TAIR REF2%BILITATED, R=~DVAT=D OR
REPLACED RESIDeNTiAL STRUCTURES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of ~upervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) Tkat ~ha Cc~e of the County of Chesterfield,
1978, as amended, is amended and reenacted by amending Article
XIII of Chapter 8 end add~n~ a ~ew Seotion 8-59.2 as follows:
chapter 8
FINANCE AND TAXATIO~
o o 0
ARTTCL~ ~TII: PARTIAL REAL ESTAT~ EX~TIONS FOR
REHABILITATION OF ~ISTORIC LANDMARKS, FOR COMNERCIAL
AND I~DUSTRIAL RF~AL ESTATE LOCATED WITHIN AN
ENTERPRISE ZONE AND FOR CERTAIN REH~-BILITATED,
RENOVATED OR R~PLkC~D RE~ID~rS~AL STRUCTURES
Section ~-59.~. ~artial exemption for ce~tain
renovated cr reuluced residential structurem.
(a) A partial exemption from real estate taxe~
gr~nte4 to c~ztain residential property which ~ualifie~ under
the criteria li~ted in subsection
(b) For real property to qualify for th~ partial
exemption granted by this section, the ~ellowing criteria mu~t
apply~
(1) The property mu~t b~ lawfully use~ for
residential purposes.
(2) T~ere must be a residential structure on the
property no less than ~5 years of ag~ which has
been r~habilitated, renovated or raplaeed;
provided, however, that if the'rea~' estate'tax-
percent (10%) lower than the assessment
similar structures in the immediutu urea, as
determined by th~ director of real estate
aseessm~nt~ due to the physical condition of
the gtruoturg, the sSructure may be 15 years or
older in order to qualify under thi~
~bseotlun.
96-386
(3) I~ the structure is a multi-fanily residential
str~cture, th~ rehabilitation, renovation or
replacement must not increase the total Square
~ootage of tbs ~t~uctu~e being rehabilitated,
renovated or replaced by nora than thirty
percent (30%).
(4) ~he rehabilitation, renovation or replacement
by more than fifteen percent (1~%) and must be
complete. The rehabilitation, renovation or
must be accomplished under appropriate building
permits.
(c) An owner of property which qualifier for a
partial exemption under this sac=ion mhall apply to the
director of real estate assessment to receive the partial
exemption. The owner shall pay an application See oS fifty
dollars ($~0.00) for each application.
(d) If the director of real estate assessment
determines that the preperty for which an application has been
filed qualifi~m for the partial exemption under this section,
or replacement. Thlm eMempt~an shall become effective on
d{rector of ~eel e~tate assessment and ~hatl run with the real
(2) That the effective date of thim ordinance shall
be July 1, 199~.
That this ordinance shall be effective from July
application for partial ~xemption under this ordinance shall be
30, 2001.
Vote: Unanimeus
Mr, Micas stated this date and time has been advertised to
consider an ordinance relating to a grant program for shrink-
swell soil assistance. ~s further stated tbs grant would apply
stated the homeowner receives a grant equal to one perce~t of
the repair cost paid by the homeowner to repair home
foundations and the grant amount would ~e paid for eight
a five year sunset and would be subject to annual
appropriations.
ordinance goes far enough and that the soard has the authority
and means ~o further assist nomeowne~ w~e have experienced
shrink/swell soil damage.
95-387
~LT. George Beadles stated hs feels adoption of thi~ oxdinance
would set a precedence for other hemeowners in the County
extending public water and sewer into County subdivisions,
There Being no one else to address thi~ ordlnanee, the public
hearing was closed.
str,ngth~n the entire County and that he feels the ordinance is
communimatln~ that the Board i~ now willing to use County
resources to assist citizens. He further stated ha will
on this issu8 and that he feels adoption of the proposed
ordinance would bsa ~tep in the right direction.
Men a~ked, ~r. ~XCas stated that, under the proposed erd~nanca
just adopted by the Board relating to the partial exemption
tax a~at~ent. Ms stated the proposed ordinance at thi~ time
yearm old.
Mr. McHale stated that he unders~an4s the intent of the
to the partial exemptium for res1 estate taxation of certain
the Board did net permit homeowners who had previously ~ade
receiving a retroactiv~ ta~ abatement and cannot Support
adoption OS 2he proposed ordinance.
~r. Daniel aaa=ed there is a window of opportunity for
funds to r~ctify this difficult situation and that he feels
issue until all county legal issues rela~ing to c~rinR/cwell
She stated she would lika to m~et with shrink/swell coil
individuals, exparlencln~ mhrink/swell damaged, that have
~ont~cted her.
Nra. Humphrey then made a motion for the Board to table
oonsideration of adoption of an ordinancu to relating to a
grant program for shrink-swell soil assistance'."
There was brief discussion relating to tabling oonsid~ratiun o~
96-388
Mrs. Humphrey withdrew her original motion.
F~r~. Humphrey then made a substitute motion to defer
ccnslderaticn of an ordinance relating to a grant program for
shrink-~well soil a~istance until ~eptember 12, 1996.
Mr. Barber seconded the substitute motion.
Mr. Warren encouraged those that have issues to be discussed
with M~s. Hump~ey to de so out of respect for a member of the
Board who has extended a hand of friendship. He stated he hopes
t/~e Board can come together on this important issue and ~ha% he
~upport~ the ~ubstitute motion.
Mr- Daniel called for the vote on the motion made by M~.
Humphrey, seconded by Mr. Barber, the Buard deferred
~hrink-~well ~oil a~i~tance until Septe~er ~2, 1996.
Vo~: Unanimous
96~N6~
WILLIAi~8 requested a Mobile Hone Permit to park a mobile home
in a R~i4ential (R-?) District. The density o£ this propo~aI
~s approximately 2.00 unlt~ per a~re. The Comprehensive Plan
per ec~e. This property fronts the we~t line of
Avenue, approximately eighteen (~$} feet northwest of Woodfin
Drive, in the vicinity cf 9822 Quailoaks Avenue. Tax Map 81-16
(1~) Quail Oaks, Section 6, Resub. Lot 1 (Zheet
race--ends approval for seven years, s~gect to standard
oonditions. Ha stated ~e area naighburhuu4 has expressed
concerns relative to =he re,es= n~gatively alfa=ting area
applicant and the a~ea ~eighbo~hood was never reached a~d the
~s request will b~ located in an area d~slgnated by th~
JafZ~rsun Davis Corridor Plan for residential
Mr. Geraldine Williams, ~eDre~enting t~a applicant, stared the
reco~endation was acceptable. ~he requested the Board's
to take v~ry g~od care of her property so as not to negatively
~. Joseph Walta, a resi~en~ o~ Qu~il oaks subdivision,
value in th~ neighborhood i~ ~he reques= is approved. He
~nt~d into ~e record a petition of nine person~
oDDosi~ion to the
~. David ~orbin, chairman of =he Eoonomic Developmen=
Co~itt~e for the Jefferson D~vis A~s~gi~tton, ~tmted ~he
on the lot; that the lot has h~en unattended and he feels the
M~. Beth Walta, President of ~ing 0ak~ Park Association, stated
doubl~ wide trailer on the property; that the A~so~iation
95-389
of the applicant, however, area residents do not want a tr~ler
in the area. She recognized approximately s~ven area
re~fdent~ in opposition of the regaest, who were present at
the meeting.
There was brief discussion relative to the differences between
When asked, Mr. Pools stated this request does n0t'~eet the
standard for modular boozing end falls under the category of
contacted Mr. Clay Walton, with the Real Estate Assessors
office, who indicated he din not feel placing a deublewid~unit
on the property would decrease area property values.
a~pllsant ha~ worked diliqently wit~ area residents. He
further stated that thoro is considerable co.cern b~ the
J~ffnr~O~ Davis corridor Association regarding mobil~ bO~e~
currently located along ~h~ Jefferson Davis Corridor and that
they feel adding new Mobile homes to the area would be a ~fep
in the wrong direction. ~e further stated he feels there would
be less concern by everyone if the ho~e could meet the modular
housing criteria. He state~ the Boar~ has approved mobile home
peri, its in the a~a, however, the majority ~re continuation of
mobile hem~ permits and not siting a new unit on a new lot.
~r. ~sHals then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Daniel, for t~e
Board to d~ny Cam~ 96SN0244.
: M~. Daniel and Mr. ~c~al~.
Absten=ion: Mr. Warren, M~, Barber, and ~rs. Humphrey.
Note: vo=es of ~r. Warren, Mr. Barber! and Mrs. Humphrsy are
On motion of Mr. ~c~ale, seconded by /dr. ~mphrey, the Board
adjourned at 9:15 p.n. until June ~6, 1996 at 3:00 p.m.
Vote: Unanimoun
L~Fe B. Ramsay ~
County Administrat~
9~-390