2011-01-26 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 2.A.
Sub'ect:
County Administrator's Report
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
The County Administrator will update the Board on the progress of various
projects as requested by the Board of Supervisors.
Preparers
Lou Lassiter
Title: Assistant County Administrator
Attachments: ^ Yes
^ No #
(P~0(Pfl1
County Administrator's
Top 40's List
I. Critical Projects/Activities
1. Airport Entrance Improvements
2. Amelia Reservoir Project
3. Business Climate Survey
4. Census 2010/Redistricting 2011
5. Citizen Satisfaction Survey - presentation to Board in January
6. Community Risk Analysis/Emergency Service Coverage
7. Countywide Comprehensive PIan/Public Facilities Plan
8. Eastern Midlothian Re-development
- Chippenham Square
- Spring Rock
- Stonebridge (formerly Cloverleaf Mall)
- Streetscaping
9. Electronic Message Centers
10. GRTC Service
11. Health Care Contract -Rebid
12. Irrigation Policies/Demand Management for Water Use
13. Low Impact Development Standards
14. Mass Grading Ordinance
15. Meadowville Interchange
16. Postal Zip Codes
17. Recycling Committee Recommendations
18. Private Sewer Treatment Facility
19. Sports Quest
20. Ukrops Kicker Complex/Poseidon Swimming -Stratton Property
21. Utilities Policies and Managed Growth
II. Ongoing ProiectslActivities
1. 2011 Legislative Program -adopted 11 /19/1 D
2. Airport Master Plan
3. Animal Shelter Issues
4. Capital Improvement Program
5. Capital Regional Collaborative Focus Group
6. Cash Proffers
7. Citizen Budget Advisory Committee
8. Efficiency Studies -Countywide
9. Federal Stimulus Package
- Energy Block Grant
- Economic Development
- Police Department
- Recovery Zone Bonds
10. FinanciallBudgetIsues
11. Fort Lee Expansion
o~a~o~z
Updated 1/3/11
County Administrator's
Top 40's List
III.
12. Hydrilla Issue
13. Joint Meetings of Board of Supervisors/School Board
14. Magnolia Green CDA
15. North American Project (at Rt. 288 and Rt. 10)
1 b. RMA Work Group
17. RRPDC -Large Jurisdiction Committee
18. RRPDC -Transportation Strategies Work Group (work on hold)
19. Sports Tourism Plan Implementation
20. UASI (Regional)
21. Upper Swift Creek Water Quality Ordinances
Completed Projects/Activities
1. Board's Appointments Process - 8/2008
2. Bow Hunting Restrictions - 2/24/2010
3. Business Climate Survey - 7/2008
4. Business Fee Holiday (Extension) - 9/201 D
5. CBLAB Discussions -12/2009
6. Citizen GIS - 5/2010
7. Citizen Satisfaction Survey -12/2008
8. COPS Grants
9. Efficiency Studies -Fire Department and Fleet Management - 6/2008
10. Efficiency Study -Quality/Chesterfield University Consolidation - 7/2009
11. Electronic Signs -1/2010
12. Board's Emergency Notification Process
13. Employee Health Benefits -Contract Renewal - 8/2009
14. Financial/Budget Issues
- Adoption of 2011 Budget - 4/2010
- Adoption of County CIP - 4/2010
- Adoption of School CIP - 4/2010
- Bond Issue/Refinancing
- AAA Ratings Retained
15. 457 Deferred Comp Plan (Approved)
16. Hosting of Hopewell Website
17. Impact Fees for Roads - 9/2008
18. In Focus Implementation - Phase I - 8/2008
19. In-Focus Implementation -Phase II (Payroll/HR) -12/2009
20. Insurance Service Upgrade (ISO) for Fire Department - 9/Z009
21. Jefferson Davis Streetscape Project - 5/2010
22. Leadership Exchange Visits with City of Richmond
23. 2010 Legislative Program - 3/2010
24. Meadowdale Library - I1 /2008
25. Midlothian TurnpikelCourthouse Road Streetscape Improvements (Towne Center)
26. Minor League Baseball (new team) - 2/2010
O~O~J~3
2 Updated 1/3111
County Administrator's
Top 40's List
27. Multi-Cultural Commission (Quarterly Reports due to Board) - I 1 /2008
28. Planning Fee Structure (General Increases) - 6/2009
29. Planning Fee Structure (Reductions for In-Home Businesses) -1 /2009
30. Planning Fees (Holiday for Commercial Projects) - 8/2009
31. Police Chase Policy (Regional) - 5/2010
32. Potential Legislation -Impact Fees/Cash Proffers -1/2009
33. Property Maintenance -Proactive Zoning Code Enforcement (countywide) - 2/2009
34. Property Maintenance -Rental Inspection Program
35. Public Safety Pay Plans Implemented (Phase I) - 9/2008
36. Redistricting 2011 Calendar/Process Report
37. Regional Workforce Investment Initiative
3 8. Results of Operations -11 /19/201 D
39. Sign Ordinance
40. Southwest Corridor Water Line - Phase I - 7/2008
41. Sports Tourism Plan -1 /2010
42. Sports Tourism Program with Metropolitan Richmond Sports Backers - 8/2009
43 . Streelight Policy -12/1 /10
44. Ukrops Kicker Complex -soccer fields -Opened 8/2009
45. Upper Swift Creek Plan (Adopted) - 6/2008
46. VDOT Subdivision Street Acceptance Requirements - 7/2009
47. VRS Benefits for New Employees - 7/2010
48. Walk Through Building Permit Process -10/2009
49. Water Issues/Restrictions
50. Website Redesign - 6/2009
51. Wind Energy Systems - 3/10/2010
52. Wireless Internet Access in County Facilities - 9/2008
53. Watkins Centre
54. Woolridge Road Reservoir Crossing Project - 5/2010
Qf30~Q4
3 Updated 1/3/l l
POTENTIAL ZIP CODE
MODIFICATIONS:
An Amended Proposal -January 2011
PrtovlolNC g FIRST
E%CELLENCEIN
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
1) Aligned with community sentiment
2) Provides every resident and business
the OPTION to use a Chesterfield-
specific name, but does not require it
3) Preserves ability to use existing mailing
address names
PROVIDINGA FIRST CHOICE
1
ZIP CODE RECAP
IN9
1) 8 zip codes with ~ ~'~-,
names more "' _ ~~ ~„~-_ .
.:1 , ,
closely associated -_, ~, ~':>a. ~
~ sl ~ "Richmond"
with communities °°'~ '~
~ -'-"" ~ zip codes
outside of the - „~,
County ~"~~ t
2) 50,000 residential >~ \~~,~_~ '~'_'
and over 4,200 t. , ~ ~~~'
commercial
addresses ,,,,, ~~ ' ~-~
~~
3) Estimates of ~ ~ ~~~°
N` '~~ ~
between $1.5 and "coiDniai Heights"
$2 million in °'Petenburg" zip code
misallocated zip code ,,,p, -
revenue ~ J
PROVIDINGA FIRST CHOICE COMMUNITY THROUGH EXCELLENCEIN PUBLIC SERVICE
PUBLIC PROCESS
1)Held two rounds of community meetings
2)Public expressed overwhelming desire to use
Chesterfield
'I
~ ~~ l 1'~
PROVIDINGA FIRST CHOICE COMM UNITY THROUGH EXCELLENCEIN PUBLIC SERVICE
2
OFFICIAL COUNTY REQUEST
Chesterfield, VA
Merge Chesterfieltl Portions o/23238.
„ r. ,. 23225 and 23224 into one zip code
»ns usirp the Chesterfield. VA name
su:s
zsras
oou~
""~ 77271 ChesarffeW, VA
For 23236 23237 and Chestelf~eld
:axss ~ portions of 23234.23634 and 23803
a+rz
»tm 7s27v F'I
mil'
:u7t 7x74 \\\ /
r»s ,C
~ r,
y- '
PROVIDING A FIRST CHOICE COM MUNITV THROUGH E%CELLENCE IN PUBLIC $E RVICE
COUNTER PROPOSAL
1) Not Henrico
model
2) Use of directional
modifiers
3) Ability to address
overlapping zip
codes
4) Similar to `Bon
Air, VA' model
already in place
PROVIDINGA FIRST CHOICE COMMUNITY THROUGH E%CELLENCE IN PUBLIC
3
BOTTOM LINE FOR CHESTERFIELD
1) Every Chesterfield resident and business would have
ability to use aChesterfield-specific mailing address
name
2) However, no one would be required to adopt the new
names, change letterhead, etc.
3) Accordingly, one could continue to use Richmond,
Petersburg, or Colonial Heights
4) NO numerical zip code changes
5) NO service disruption, change in post office
assignment, etc.
PROVIDINGA FIRST CHOICE COMMUNITY THROUGH EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC SERVICE
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC INPUT
1) A third round of public meetings is
anticipated
2) Have established a dedicated point of
contact at County to field questions
about the proposal: 748-1211
3) Materials will be posted on the web site
PROVIDINGA FIRST CHOICE COMM UNITY THROUGH EXCELLENCEIN PUBLIC SERVICE
4
(QUESTIONS...
PROVID~NGA FIRST
i~ _ z" {4i
,~, 1719, ,,
~RCtIi1~'°%~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 5.A.
Subject:
Recognizing Mr. James E. Ninio,
Technician, Upon His Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
Fleet Management Division Automotive
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Mr. James Ninio retired from General Services, Fleet Management Division on
January 1, 2011, after 29 years of dedicated service to Chesterfield County.
Preparers Robert Kev Title: Director of General Services
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #
(~~0~-05
RECOGNIZING MR.JAMES E. NINIO UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mr. James E. Ninio retired January 1, 2011, after providing
twenty-nine years of dedicated and faithful service to Chesterfield County;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ninio began his service July 7, 1981, as an Automotive
Technician, in the Fleet Management Consolidated Maintenance Shop; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ninio was instrumental in the implementation of modern
cutting edge technological advancements in tools and equipment; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ninio was instrumental in the development of a successful
vehicle maintenance support and services program, which reflects a daily
average readiness rate of nearly 95 percent; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ninio tutored and mentored his co-workers to become the
best in their field; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ninio continuously extended courteous, polite and excellent
service to his customers, and his dedication to quality resulted in above
average productivity and a low rate of return repairs; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Ninio consistently performed his duties and
responsibilities in a professional manner and placed the welfare and safety
of citizens and fellow county employees above his own personal comfort and
feelings and will be missed by his fellow co-workers and customers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, this 26th day of January 2011, publicly recognizes Mr. James E.
Ninio and extends appreciation for his twenty-nine years of dedicated service
to the county, congratulates him upon his retirement, and offers best wishes
for a long and happy retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented
to Mr. Ninio, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the
papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
o~o~as
:~: -..~
,; ~ .
'/ ~1
~;
~; ~ ~r
,, ~;
~,,._
1749
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 201 ltem Number: 5.6.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Major P. Michael Spraker, Police Department, Upon His
Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Major P. Michael Spraker retired from the Police Department on January 1,
2011, after providing more than 34 years of service to the citizens of
Chesterfield County.
Preparers Colonel Thierry G. Dupuis
Title: Chief of Police
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
'b~oa~~
RECOGNIZING MAJOR P. MICHAEL SPRAKER UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Major P. Michael Spraker retired from the Chesterfield County
Police Department on January 1, 2011, after providing more than 34 years of
quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker has faithfully served the county in the
capacities of patrol officer, investigator, sergeant, lieutenant, captain and
major; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure with the Police Department, Major Spraker
served diligently in the Uniform Operations Bureau Personnel and Training
Unit, Investigations Bureau, Support Services Division and Police
Administration; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker has served in numerous assignments throughout his
career with Chesterfield to include Field Evidence Technician, Field Training
Officer, Explorer Post Advisor, General Instructor, Firearms Instructor and
Tactical Team Leader; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker had the distinction of being selected as the
Chesterfield County Police Department Officer of the Year for 1981; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker served as Sergeant in charge of the Charity
Powers Task Force and was instrumental in assisting the Commonwealth's
Attorney's office in obtaining the information needed in order to effectively
prosecute Everette Mueller; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker received the Meritorious Service Award in 2005,
for his leadership as Chairperson of the Police Department Memorial Committee
and for his diligent work in coordinating the design, funding and
construction of a permanent memorial to honor Chesterfield County police
officers killed in the line of duty, and this goal was achieved May 17, 2005
with the dedication of a granite monument on the grounds of the Historic 1917
Courthouse; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker was presented with a Certificate of Achievement
in 1995 for his outstanding efforts in the development of an Incident Command
System Training Program, which included the design of a Lesson Plan and
Operational Guide for Supervision; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker made significant contributions to twelve
different committees during his exemplary career, including the Police Awards
and Decorations Committee, Capital Region Communication Steering Committee,
Chesterfield EMS Council Incident Command Committee and the County Fleet
Steering committee, and he also served as a Board member of the Community in
Schools organization; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker has received numerous Chief's Commendation
Awards; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker was recognized for his division's success in
significantly expanding the number of Police Department volunteers as well as
the number of volunteer hours worked, for the development of an annual
oooo~s
Volunteer Awards and Recognition Ceremony and was recognized by the
International Association of Chiefs of Police for having one of the top three
volunteer programs in the nation; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker is recognized for his superb professional
attitude, excellent communications and human relations skills and his
attention to detail, which he has utilized within the Police Department and
in assisting citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker has received numerous letters of commendation,
thanks and appreciation during his career from the citizens of Chesterfield
County for service rendered; and
WHEREAS, Major Spraker has provided the Chesterfield County Police
De artment with many years of loyal and dedicated service and consistently
p
served as an outstanding role model during his career; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss
Major Spraker's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Su ervisors, this 26th day of January 2011, publicly recognizes Major P.
P
Michael Spraker, and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of
Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service to the county,
congratulations upon his retirement and best wishes for a long and happy
retirement.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented
to Major Spraker, and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the
J
a ers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Pp
00009
,. ~ ~~~,,
,~ _
~, ~
eq ~~
~f
~ ~ I~1749
X11',-'`.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: s.A.
Subject:
Work Session on the Proposed FY2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program
County Administrator's Comments:
tip.
~~
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Hold a work session on the proposed FY2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program.
Summary of Information:
A work session on the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has been
scheduled for this date. The program encompasses afive-year period, FY2012-
16 and proposes funding for new facilities, renovations and expansions of
existing facilities, and transportation projects.
The five-year plan proposes expenditures of $462.7 million. A breakdown of
the CIP is as follows:
General County Projects
School Projects
Utility Projects
Total
Preparers Allan M. Carmody
$161,654,700
143,624,300
157,438,000
$462,717,000
Title: Director, Budget & Management
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
# 000020
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2
AGENDA
The proposed CIP, including revenues and specific expenditures will be
reviewed at the work session.
There is no action requested of the Board during the work session. A public
hearing on the CIP is scheduled for March 23rd followed by adoption on April
13th.
The County Charter requires adoption of the CIP by May 1St.
ooo~ss
O
N
t0
N
3
C
00012
i
G
O
t
y+
a
'~
d
N
O
a
0
L
r
N
~+
V
~O
L
a
A
~+
C
3
O
V
N
d
~+
a
3
~~
3
C
d
L
L
O
O
N
M
N
~+
V
~O
i
a
N
~+
V
d
~O
i
a
O A
o
s
N ~
~ N
L
V
0~0~~3
N
n
M0
W
~~
'~
~~
0
r
d
V
C
3
~'!
H
d
V
L
~
~ 3
~ as
_ •-
~,
o
w
v
z ~
as
L
d ~
~
~ ~
Q V
N M
a
H
4~
.~
~~
,_
~,
~~
L
i~
^
a+
3
a
c
C
i
~+
W
C
O
V
d
d
N
V
d
~O
i
a
d
C
d
^
^~
~~
~,
U
~~ol
114
d d d
= N r
y+ '~ a+
L '~ C
d = '~
O ,~ ~
~ ~ C
a ~ °'
E ~ ~ ~
- v,
~' ~ v
m ~ c
v .- ~,
= o ~ ~
'°'i °'3 ~
= as ~~ v
~a ~~ ea
a~ ~ c a
_ ~''- d
:~ '= A i
C
C. ~ i d
V ~ W O Z
r N M
N
i
tC
d
A
i
d
~+
0
015
,\
I~
cc
ai
L
W
0
0
z
v
~~~
I
ti
N
J
Q
H
0
F-
0
Q16
~J
N ~
'a 1!~
R
O N
~ d'~
c
m
a
._
a
W
to
M
u~
as
0
0
e
z
o
= d
v
o
~+ =
i R
~ ~ ++
Z
N
H Ef! O
_ ~ C
C
V ~
~ •~
~
L
J
~_
~o
M
r
r
oc~
017
3
a,
z
0
:~
v
i
a
'a
0
a
r
d?
L
0
d
E
a
._
..
\ ~
y
^
i /
,
V
i
~ ~ O
O ~ ^
L i
•
~
~
~
N
M
r
d!
as
0
0
s
v
a~
~J
r
r
oo~o~s
~~
II
N
N
N
L
r
L~L
ti
0
d
O
~\
~ N
E ~
a~
v ~
ea a
aE
as o
~ t~
0
O~J~9
,\
~ J
~J
0
N
L
a
L
.;
U
M
O
N
L
i+
U
L
0
._
Q~0
z~
0
~ ~
o~ ~
N M
6f} EA
~ y
~+
=
w
~ ~+ ~
~ _
~
~ ~
O u~
E y V
C
~ w ~,
N V c~
. ~ o ~ ~ y
~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~
O
O =
~ ~ y ~
~ t+
~
O
~ ~
c w
c L
~
~ >
v ~6
~
~ 5
~ O
; ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ N
~-
~ ~
~
._
~
m
~
_
N
= ~
~
~
_
._ ._
~
._
-
~
m
.
~
~
Q
~
._
~ o
._
~
c~
~
N
~
L ~
m
N
~
~
o _
~
~
~~
o
~
y
._
~ ~ ~ _
0
o~i
U
C
(B
(0
m
0
~I
N
N
~L
0
y-+
Q
N
M
N
Eft
N
r
M
0
0
U
f/)
r
Eft
0
r
t0
M
N
'L
L
J
O
d~
0
0
0
0
cv
0
s
~f § a ~'~ skr a ~~ vrt ;y,'
'~' ~,~ .~
'+ ' - 7
'i ~ • 1
~M1 t~~r'b. F..
s'uJ ~'P~-. ~h
ra
' ;r ~.:
hit ~.M i
.. l
1 ~ S ~`
~~.
rh 1 At
7+~~ s4 u.~Y K:.~.
. 't ~, ' F~',y
Y°M`~ ~+
}}~, ~1 ~ 1 ~~
Yti~ ~ ;_ S
1
.. J ~, ~. ,a.~
~~ r'
` ' ~M .
~ ~,:
'~ ~F T,~
~r
''i jt.
~v~ , ~t
~~a ~yi ~~, ra
~ e
~"r~}r ~~ ~,,,
~ F ~F. ~ r r`~, ` f .
rn # r 41 pS~~ ~~d iT +1 ~,.
~.
~:~:
~t~:~
}jy~,:
~;
,~,~,~
~`R
'x ~k ~a -a ,.~
~f~ k~..:
Cq<' ~
~ J.
~:
~~ "~
a~~!~3k7 a.
~ 1~'~w 4 yY ~
4Y T 5 f S
4
Y. Y,~ .tl G .,. ' .
y
4~
O
N
0
iU~2
= o
o
~, ~, c
y ea ca a~
L N O .y+ ~
~ L ~ ~ O O
~
~
c o ~ ~ a ~ ~
Gs J ~ W ~' O
O
~' ° 3 '°
0 o ~° era ~
• L
~ v ~ ~ L ~
3
3 V
•~ +
+
~
o
= LC
L
a
z
z r
~ o
m ~
w ~
oz~
z ~'
w L
~ ~
i+ O r
w •O Z N
~ p ~ >N
~ ~ p r
~ ~~' ZN
!~C y ,~
a ~
E d
~ ~
N
~ y R d d
O
i V = ~ N
O = y
d = "~ ,v
~ 1~''0 y '~ +~+
d Q d ~ H
i O w = ~ a ~u
~+ ++ - ,
w R Q' *'' Z N ' °^
d ~ ~ v d
~+ R d ~
~z 2c. F
000
4
~ ~
~
N
~
~ O
~
O
~ i
r
C
~
~
G f
~
w 3 d y w ~
V ~i
m
t ~ V d +_+ N~ 01 NJ d
V ~ ~ ~ V = ~ _
C
d J ~ Q d H Z W
0
~5
r
m ~,
v i d ~C N
c°~
= IC
33 >
m
z
mo°c
ca~o~~s
0
..
~ ~ N
~ V
~
~+ ~ Q d d ~
3
d
C
~
~ 0 d > d >
E d s °'
£ L
o c'
£ L
~
W ~ N~ ~ H
oflo
4~
3
~+
3
y
_ =
~
v ~
~'
_ o
~ = a N
o
,_
,_ ,_
~
~
>
o
~ as
~
_
,_ >
_ ~
~
~
~ o c~ ~
~
~ _
m ~ ~
y _
~_
~ ~
~ 0
~
a ~
y
,-
,_
Q
sY
O ~
~
p
~ _
=
v
N ~
ti
N
~}
~~~
a~ ~~
~ ~
~ ~ N
_ ~ ~
W y
o~oo~s
J
0
A
~.+
.~
V
d
N
A
L
W
N
c
a~
E
a~
0
L
QC
G
~J
r
d9
N
v
a~
'o
L
a
0
0
c
t
v
as
H
a~
c~
„,~ ~~~
~ , ~'~ i. '
f~ ,;•
xG' ~i ,
t ~ "~~' v kr
~~~t' ~Y:
x~
"'~~~
~,~. i
a{~ ,--
I~:; ,~
r~ 4C'
a ~~
V.
Me ~~
i~ ~, 'S
~~~3~
~~~e( ~
F R :~3,
„+~
,•ti
a`'
/1 1~
q.h n
.ytl-
4'",F'i~"~d.
~ n
r( r~.
1J f^a. ,
,!h ~
a
~~7
4.~
.~
-~ ,:.
.h
ri ;~
MMw ~ +'
f r...
V~
,~ r
~ ,a
~~,
i
~Y ~ rcF ~
µ~,
i ~ ..
a~
ycd
r~'v~ ~
.+,.
rt1 »k
6 w. ' b
r
1' ~
y[~ ~~
7 L ^ .F Y
P
N'~~'~h' M:``J
V
T
~1~4~%~ 4 t
Fr~~~ F !
t ~.
~~ .y
,,w,~ 4~
~, w.
i ~ ~ k
~t~O+~J?9
i
co
v
d
'o
L
a
L
r
3
as
t
o~oo~o
N
-~
L
~+
V
L
~ ~
~ ~
_ ~
L ~C
7 Q
LL ~
oc~
~a~:~.
Sri
L
++
V
L
~ _
L
L ~C
~ ~
LL ~
o~
0~2
i
._
~,
,~
~- _ ~
~_,~ ~ ~
* }
i ~
V, r^
~ _~
-M
~---~=
~~ ~
~ nJ I~
~ ~ ~ ~~
~1
~ ~~ j
i
~ ~ ~`~.,
N ~ ~ O
~ M = _ .~
~' o
~ N~~ M~
t ~ S ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ V ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~
~U ~~ Qm
o~oo~;
O CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2
AGENDA
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 7.A.
Subject:
Adoption of an Ordinance Establishing a Special Assessment for Property in
the Chippenham Place Community Development Authority District and Approval
of a Memorandum of Understanding with the Chippenham Place Community
Development Authority and Stonebridge Realty Holdings, LLC
County Administrator's Comments:
,,
County Administrator: `
Board Action Requested:
Adopt an ordinance establishing a special assessment on the property in
the Chippenham Place Community Development Authority district; and 2)
approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the County, the Chippenham
Place Community Development Authority and Stonebridge Realty Holdings,
LLC.
Summary of Information:
At the meeting on January 12, 2011, the Board held a public hearing to
consider the Special Assessment Ordinance and Memorandum of Understanding.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, staff recommended that the Board
defer its decision on these items until the January 26 meeting so that
additional progress could be made on one of the requirements for the
closing of Phase I of the project - the infrastructure development plan.
Since the January 12 meeting, Crosland's representative has come to the
county to meet in person about the infrastructure development plan and has
now submitted a draft of the plan from which the parties are continuing to
Preparer:lNilliam D. Dueler
Title: Interim Deputy County Administrator
2723:85399.1
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
000034
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2
AGENDA
negotiate. while the infrastructure plan does not require Board approval,
it is the document through which the parties will ensure that the
necessary infrastructure on the property is constructed in a timely
fashion, in proper sequence and appropriately funded. Staff anticipates
that, with Crosland's assistance, the infrastructure development plan will
be in substantially complete form by January 26. If, however, there are
outstanding issues on January 26, staff will identify these issues for the
Board and ask the Board to adopt the attached ordinance contingent on
resolution of those issues to the satisfaction of the county.
Q~Q~?5
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE
CHIPPENHAM PLACE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AND AUTHORIZING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND STONEBRIDGE REALTY HOLDINGS, LLC
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the
County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County") created the
Chippenham Place Community Development Authority (the "CDA") by
Ordinance enacted June 25, 2008 (the "Ordinance"); and
WHEREAS, the CDA has requested that the Board establish a
special assessment on property within the CDA District; and,
WHEREAS, the Board proposes to set forth certain agreements
with the CDA and Stonebridge Realty Holdings, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, as contract purchaser and developer
of the land within the CDA (the "Developer") pursuant to a
Memorandum of Understanding among the County, the Developer, and
the CDA (the "Memorandum of Understanding"); and
WHEREAS, the CDA proposes to issue its bonds (the "Bonds")
to finance certain infrastructure improvements benefiting the
CDA District; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of a special assessment on
property within the CDA District and the actions contemplated by
the Memorandum of Understanding will benefit the citizens of the
County by promoting increased employment opportunities, a
strengthened economic base and increased tax revenues and
additional business opportunities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA:
1. Approval of Memorandum of Understanding. The Memorandum
of Understanding is approved in substantially the form presented
to the Board at this meeting, with such changes and corrections
(including, without limitation, changes in the date thereof)
that do not materially adversely affect the County's interests
as may be approved by the County Administrator or the Chairman
of the Board of Supervisors, whose approval shall be evidenced
conclusively by the execution and delivery of the Memorandum of
Understanding. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the
Board of Supervisors, or either of them, is authorized and
directed to execute and deliver the Memorandum of Understanding.
2. Special Assessment. By agreement between the Developer
and the Board pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding,
2723:84983.1 1 ~~h~'
special assessments to pay the costs of public improvements to
benefit property within the CDA District are hereby established
and apportioned in accordance with the Rate and Method of
Apportionment of Special Assessments ("RMA") in substantially
the form presented to the Board at this meeting. The CDA Board
is authorized to approve or to provide for the approval of a
Special Assessment Roll allocating the special assessment among
the tax parcels within the CDA District in accordance with the
RMA as such tax parcels exist as of the date of recordation of
the RMA in the land records of the County. The CDA shall cause
notice of the special assessments to be reported to the County's
Treasurer or other County official responsible for the
collection of taxes. The special assessments shall be liens on
the taxable real property in the CDA District in accordance with
the provisions of Virginia Code Sections 15.2-2404 et seq.
3. Subsequent Resolution. The Board may, by subsequent
resolution, make such additional changes or amendments to the
Memorandum of Understanding as it determines to be necessary or
appropriate.
4. Severability. If any part, section, clause or phrase of
this Ordinance, or any individual assessment levied hereby, is
declared to be unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such
decision shall not affect the validity of any other portion
hereof or assessment hereunder.
5. Effective
immediately.
Certified by:
Janice Blakley
Clerk to the Board
Date. This Ordinance shall be effective
2723:84983 .1 2 ~~~~~
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (this "Memorandum") is made as of
December 1, 2010, by and between the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA (the
"County"); STONEBRIDGE REALTY HOLDINGS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
or its successor or assigns, as landowner and developer (the "Developer"); and CHIPPENHAM
PLACE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (the "CDA").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of an Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale
Agreement dated June 26, 2008, as further amended and assigned by instruments dated
January 14, 2009, December 23, 2009, and August 25, 2010 (the "Land Sale Agreement"),
between the Economic Development Authority of the County of Chesterfield (the "EDA"),
Crosland Stonebridge LLC (which has assigned its interest thereunder to the Developer), and the
County, the Developer either has purchased or is obligated to purchase from the EDA certain real
property consisting of an approximately 83-acre site and certain improvements thereon and more
particularly shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
(collectively, the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Developer expects to undertake the development of Stonebridge, a
mixed-use residential, commercial and retail center ("Stonebridge") to be located on the Property
and currently expects to develop at least 69 acres on which it or third parties plan to construct
approximately _ square feet of retail space, _multi-family units and _ single family units and
_ square feet of commercial space (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County (the "Board of Supervisors")
received a petition (the "Petition") pursuant to Sections 15.2-5152 et seq. of the Code of Virginia
of 1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code"), from the EDA requesting the Board of Supervisors
to create a community development authority to assist in the development of certain
infrastructure improvements as described in the Petition and on Exhibit B hereto (the
"Improvements") in conjunction with the development of the Project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Petition and in consideration of the Developer's undertaking
of the Project, by Ordinance enacted June 25, 2008 (the "Ordinance"), attached hereto as Exhibit
C, the Board of Supervisors created the CDA and the CDA District (as described in the
Ordinance); and
WHEREAS, the transactions contemplated by this Memorandum will benefit the citizens
of the County by promoting increased employment opportunities, a strengthened economic base
and increased tax revenues and additional retail and residential opportunities not currently
available in the local area; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to set forth several understandings with respect to the CDA
and its plan of finance in this Memorandum:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties set forth the
following agreements and understandings:
oc~o~~~
1. Issuance of Bonds. The CDA proposes to issue bonds in two series (the
"Bonds") pursuant to Virginia Code Sections 15.2-515 8(A)(2) and 15.2-5125, under an
Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture") between the CDA and a trustee (the "Trustee") in the
maximum aggregate principal amount not to exceed $17, 250,000. The proceeds of the Bonds
will be used to pay a portion of the costs associated with the acquisition, design, construction,
project management and development of the Improvements, capitalized interest through
_, 20_, required reserves, the costs of issuing the Bonds (including, but not limited to,
attorneys' fees, underwriter fees, engineering fees and appraisal fees) and any additional
administrative costs to be incurred by the County in connection with the administration and
operation of the CDA. The Bonds shall have a term of no longer than thirty (30) years from the
date of issuance of the [first] [second] series of Bonds, inclusive of the capitalized interest
period. Any costs associated with the acquisition, design, construction and development of the
Improvements that exceed the proceeds of the Bonds allocated therefor shall be the sole
responsibility of the Developer. If there are any Bond proceeds remaining after the completion
of the acquisition, design, construction and development of the Improvements, such excess
proceeds shall be used to pay down the Bonds. The CDA will not issue any additional bonds or
undertake any financing, including any refunding bonds, without the prior approval of the Board
of Supervisors. Interest on the Bonds shall not be paid from Incremental Tax Revenues, as
described below, or other revenues pledged to payment of the Bonds until moneys deposited in
the capitalized interest account under the Indenture have been expended. The County, the
Developer and the CDA acknowledge that all of the Improvements to be financed with the
proceeds of the Bonds will be constructed after the issuance of the first series of the Bonds.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Land Sale Agreement either the County or the
Developer will fund the costs of the Improvements to the extent not funded by the proceeds of
the first series of the Bonds. The proceeds from the issuance of the second series of the Bonds
will be used to reimburse the County for the costs it incurred in connection with the
Improvements under the Land Sale Agreement.
2. Development of Improvements. The Improvements to be financed with the
proceeds of the Bonds, along with other funds provided by the Developer, consist of various
infrastructure more particularly described in the Petition and in Exhibit B hereto. Amounts not
needed for any portion of the Improvements shown on Exhibit B may be reallocated first to other
Improvements shown on Exhibit B and then to such associated improvements as may be
approved by the CDA and the County. The CDA, or the Developer or its designee, on behalf of
the CDA, will enter into contracts for the acquisition, design, construction, project management
and development of the Improvements. In connection with the foregoing, the CDA will comply
with all applicable requirements of the Virginia Public Procurement Act.
3. Submission of Information. Before the issuance of the Bonds for each series,
the Developer or the CDA, as appropriate, will submit to the County Administrator a Limited
offering Memorandum or other disclosure document to be used in connection with the sale of
the Bonds and such other information with respect to the CDA's finances and the issuance of the
Bonds as the County Administrator may reasonably request. Such documents will be furnished
to the County solely for informational purposes and receipt of any such document does not
constitute approval of any such document by the County or any person not submitting such
documents.
o~o~~s
2
4. Special Assessments and Incremental Tax Revenues.
(a) Special Assessment. (i) Request for Collection -- Not later than February 15 of
each year, commencing ,the CDA will furnish the annual report described in paragraph
5(~ to the County and will request the County to collect annual installments (the "Annual
Installment") of a special assessment (the "Special Assessment") within the CDA District
pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.2-5158(A)(5) in an amount to be determined in accordance
with the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Assessment attached hereto as Exhibit D
(the "Rate and Method"), which amount may be zero with respect to one or more Parcels (as
defined in the Rate and Method). In making the above request, the CDA will provide such
information as the County may request to enable it to collect the Annual Installment. The
Special Assessment shall be in an amount equal to debt service on the Bonds, administrative
expenses of the County in connection with the levy and collection of the Special Assessment and
the performance of its obligations hereunder, less other amounts available for the payment of
such debt service and expenses including, in particular, amounts payable pursuant to the
provisions of paragraph 4(b) below (the "Assessment Amount"). The Annual Installment shall
be equal to the Assessment Amount due in any calendar year.
(11) County's Agreement with respect to Assessment; Assignment -- The
County Administrator or other officer responsible for proposing the County's budget to the
Board of Supervisors shall propose payments to the CDA to be derived from such Annual
Installment in the County's budget for each fiscal year any Bonds are outstanding; provided,
however, any collection and payment of the Annual Installment derived from Special
Assessments shall be made only to the extent that Incremental Tax Revenues calculated pursuant
to this Memorandum are insufficient in amount to pay the Annual Installment then due or to be
due in each such fiscal year, with such calculation being made without regard to whether the
County actually appropriates any Incremental Tax Revenues to the CDA. The County agrees
that so long as the Bonds are outstanding the County will collect the Annual Installment and pay
the amounts received thereunder to the CDA, subject to appropriation each year by the Board of
Supervisors. The County pledges and assigns all of its right, title and interest in the Annual
Installment to the CDA (except amounts that may be retained by the County to pay
administrative costs, as described in paragraph 4(c) below). The CDA, in turn, will pledge and
assign all of its right, title and interest in the Annual Installment to the trustee for the Bonds (the
"Trustee") or its successor who will use the moneys received, except for amounts segregated for
administrative expenses, to make debt service payments on the Bonds before forwarding any
remainder to the CDA and the County agrees to make all such payments directly to the Trustee
for the Bonds. The Annual Installment assigned by the County includes any payments from
foreclosures, less costs of collection, and excludes administrative fees for the cost of
administration as described in paragraph 4(c) below. The CDA has the right to retain a portion
of the payments assigned by the County to pay the CDA's administrative expenses and such
portion of the payments is not pledged or assigned to the Trustee for the Bonds.
The County's obligation to make payments to the CDA of the Annual Installment
shall not be deemed to be a general obligation of the County, shall be payable solely from
payments of the Annual Installment received by the County and shall be subject to and
dependent on appropriations being made from time to time of the Annual Installment by the
Board of Supervisors for such purpose.
OfD0~40
3
(111} Developer's Agreement with Respect to Assessment -- In accordance with
Virginia Code Sections 15.2-5158(A)(5) and 15.2-2405, the parties hereto agree to the Special
Assessment to be levied and apportioned in accordance with this Memorandum and the Rate and
Method which is incorporated as though set forth fully herein. The Developer for itself and its
successors and assigns represents and agrees that the Special Assessment, as apportioned
pursuant to the Rate and Method, does not exceed the peculiar benefit to the assessed property
resulting from the Improvements and is apportioned to property within the CDA District on a
rational basis. The Developer acknowledges that the County may commence foreclosure
proceedings for the collection of delinquent Special Assessments within the CDA District. In
order to reduce the likelihood of any prolonged foreclosure actions, the Developer will provide
for facilitated service of process with respect to any foreclosure action in respect of delinquent
Special Assessments levied in the CDA District and will waive affirmative defenses to any such
foreclosure action pertaining to the formation of the CDA District and its financing structure,
including the Rate and Method, the validity of the Bonds, the requirements of the Indenture and
the priority of CDA District liens and foreclosure of liens to collect delinquent Special
Assessments, provided, however, that such waiver shall not be deemed to prevent the Developer
from asserting in a separate legal action (and not as an affirmative defense in any foreclosure
action) a challenge to (I) any levy not made in accordance with the terms of the Rate and
Method, or (II) a foreclosure not undertaken in accordance with the County's generally
applicable foreclosure procedures.
(iv) Billing and Collection of Annual Installment -- The County shall bill the
Annual Installment, to the extent the CDA requests collection of the Annual Installment, in the
same manner and at the same time as it bills its real estate taxes. The amount of the Annual
Installment for each Parcel will be recorded in the County land records such that the public will
have access to its existence. Penalties and interest on delinquent payments of the Annual
Installment shall be charged as provided by law. The Annual Installment shall be included on
the County's regular real estate tax bill or in a separate bill in the same envelope as the County's
regular real estate tax bill, and shall be collected on the same dates as the County's real estate
taxes. Payments of the Annual Installment collected by the County shall be segregated from all
other funds of the County and may not be used for any other purpose by the County.
(v) Collection of Delinquent Assessments -- The County's customary tax
payment enforcement proceedings will apply to the collection of any delinquent payment of the
Annual Installment. The County shall pursue the collection of delinquent payments with the
same diligence it employs in the collection of the County's general ad valorem real estate taxes,
including the commencement of tax foreclosure proceedings to the extent provided by the then-
current statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The County agrees that it will provide notice
to the CDA of any legal proceedings to be instituted for the collection of delinquent payments of
the Annual Installment. The parties understand and agree that the County's ordinary discretion
in this regard allows it to decide not to expend resources to collect de minimis outstanding
amounts; provided that the County will obtain the CDA's consent with respect to any such
amounts in excess of $200. The CDA agrees to cooperate with the County in any such
en orcement action.
(vi) Surplus - If, in any calendar year, the Incremental Tax Revenues (as
hereinafter defined) computed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 4(b) below (for purposes
of this Section 4(a)(iv) such computation shall be without regard to whether any Incremental Tax
4 U~0441
Revenues are actually appropriated by the Board to the CDA) exceed the Annual Installment for
such calendar year attributable to the Bonds, such excess shall be deemed a "Surplus." Any
Surplus shall, to the extent actually appropriated by the Board to the CDA, be deposited by the
County in an account (the "Surplus Fund") to be established with the Trustee under the Indenture
to be used in the event that Incremental Tax Revenues in any year are less than amounts needed
to pay the applicable Annual Installment for such year; provided, however, that if in any year the
financial report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5(f) below shows that the sum of
(I) Incremental Tax Revenues available for debt service on the Bonds in the prior year and (II)
Incremental Tax Revenues projected to be available for debt service on the Bonds in the current
year are each at least equal to 1.5 times debt service on the Bonds, the County shall not be
required to deposit any Surplus in the Surplus Fund in the current year. If any Incremental Tax
Revenues would have constituted Surplus and otherwise would have been deposited to the
Surplus Fund pursuant to the provisions of this Section 4(a)(vi) had they been appropriated by
the County to the CDA but which were not so appropriated ("Unappropriated Surplus"), the
CDA and the County agree that any Special Assessment otherwise levied to pay an Annual
Installment for any subsequent period will be reduced (but not below zero) by the amount of the
Unappropriated Surplus; provided, however, that in any year for which the County is not
required to deposit any Surplus in the Surplus Fund in accordance with debt service coverage
provisions set forth immediately above, then there shall be no credit against Special Assessments
levied for subsequent periods. In the event the terms of this Section 4(a)(vi) would result in the
creation of Unappropriated Surplus, any such Unappropriated Surplus shall be credited against
any subsequently levied Special Assessment in the same manner as Surplus actually appropriated
and deposited in the Surplus Fund. Any credit for Unappropriated Surplus will be applied to all
separately assessed parcels in the CDA District in the same proportions as any Special
Assessment would be levied. If any portion of the Annual Installment for a given calendar year
was collected by the County from the Developer, the Surplus shall be used to reimburse the
Developer for that portion of the Annual Installment applicable to the Bonds for such calendar
year that was actually collected from the Developer by the County in accordance with the Rate
and Method. The County and the CDA agree that any Surplus payable to the Developer pursuant
to this subparagraph (vi) shall be paid to the EDA or other entity legally authorized to make
payments to the Developer.
Any amounts on deposit in the Surplus Fund after the Bonds have been re-paid in
full, or provision for their re-payment in full has been made, and any reimbursements to the
Developer have been made as provided above, shall be paid to the County.
(b) Incremental Tax Revenues. (i) Subject to (iv) below, the County hereby agrees
to pay to, or on behalf of, the CDA amounts equal to certain Incremental Tax Revenues,
determined as set forth below, each year as long as any Bonds are outstanding. The County
Administrator or other officer responsible for proposing the County's budget to the Board of
Supervisors shall propose payments to the CDA to be derived from such Incremental Tax
Revenues in the County's budget for each fiscal year any Bonds are outstanding.
(11) The payments to, or on behalf of, the CDA of amounts equal to the
Incremental Tax Revenues shall be used on asemi-annual basis to pay, in whole or in part as the
case maybe, the Annual Installment for that particular calendar year attributable to the Bonds.
~m~oo4z
5
(111) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Memorandum, the
County shall make each such payment of amounts equal to the Incremental Tax Revenues only
to the extent it has collected Incremental Tax Revenues. Further, the County's agreement to pay
such Incremental Tax Revenues to the CDA as provided in this Memorandum is made in
consideration of the Developer satisfying its agreement contained in Section 2.1 of the
Development Agreement dated _, 2010 (the "Development Agreement"), between the
CDA and the Developer pursuant to which the Developer has agreed to construct or cause to be
constructed certain minimum portions of the Private Development (as defined therein). In the
event the Developer fails to construct or cause to be constructed such minimum portions of the
Private Development described in such Section 2.1, the County will have no obligation to make
payments of Incremental Tax Revenues provided in this paragraph 5(b) until such time as the
Developer has satisfied its development obligation under Section 2.1 of the Development
Agreement.
(iv) The County's obligation to make payments to the CDA of amounts equal
to Incremental Tax Revenues shall not be deemed to be a general obligation of the County and
shall be subject to and dependent on appropriations being made from time to time by the Board
of Supervisors for such purpose.
(v) The Incremental Tax Revenues shall equal the sum of (I) all of the
County's regular ad valorem real property tax revenues (not including any special tax revenues)
collected each calendar year by the County within the CDA District (including payments of any
"roll back" taxes) which exceed the ad valorem real property tax revenues collected by the
County within the CDA District during calendar year [insert base calendar year] which base
amount is $ and (II) all of the County's portion of the retail sales and use tax collected
each calendar year by the County from retail and other establishments located within the CDA
District and subject to such retail sales and use tax. Such Incremental Tax Revenues shall be
paid semi-annually by the County to the Trustee, as assignee of the CDA, in an amount equal to
the Incremental Tax Revenues collected in each such six-month period (but not exceeding actual
Incremental Tax Revenues collected in such calendar year), on each 1 and 1,
beginning 1, 20_.
After the Bonds have been re-paid in full, or provision for their re-payment in full has
been made, the tax increment contribution plan shall expire and all Incremental Tax Revenues
shall thereafter be retained by the County.
(c) Administrative Costs. If requested by the County, the CDA shall reimburse the
County for its reasonable costs and expenses associated with the CDA, including the
administration and collection of the revenues payable to the CDA. Administrative expenses (not
to exceed $ in the first year the Annual Installment is collected and $ in subsequent
years) may be deducted by the County in its remittance to the CDA or the Trustee for the Bonds;
provided that the initial payment of $ may be paid from proceeds of the Bonds in lieu of
deducting it from the first payment of the Annual Installment so long as the portion of the Bond
proceeds available for use by the Developer to fund the costs of Improvements is not less than
$5,657,547 in the case of the first series of Bonds and an aggregate $11,315,095 in the case of
both series of Bonds. In addition to administrative expenses, the County shall be entitled to
recover any additional costs incurred by the County in conjunction with any and all proceedings
0~0~43
6
to collect the amounts payable to the CDA hereunder, including tax foreclosure, administrative
and other proceedings.
(d) Notice to Subsequent Landowners. The Developer will include in each sales
contract and each deed for the conveyance of a fee simple interest in any portion of land within
the CDA District that is subject to an outstanding Special Assessment a disclosure statement that
includes a statement of the amount of the applicable portion of the Special Assessment and
setting forth the name and address of the CDA's administrator or other location where
information regarding the CDA and the Special Assessment may be obtained. All such sales
contracts and deeds shall also include a covenant that all subsequent deeds conveying any fee
simple interest in land within the CDA District that is subject to an outstanding Special
Assessment include such disclosure statement. The Developer agrees that it will notify the CDA
and the CDA's administrator in writing, within ten (10) days after recordation of a deed of
conveyance, of the sale of any land owned by the Developer indicating the tax map parcel
number of the property sold and the purchaser of the property.
5. Additional Covenants.
(a) The Developer and the CDA agree that all improvements financed with proceeds
of the Bonds will be conveyed to the County or other appropriate public entity. The County or
other appropriate public entity shall undertake ownership, operation and maintenance of all such
improvements, subject to the satisfaction of the requirements outlined in paragraph 5(g) below
and as otherwise provided under the terms of the Development, Acquisition and Financing
Agreement dated the date hereof between the CDA and the Developer. The County and the
CDA acknowledge that certain roads to be constructed with the proceeds of the Bonds will not
be acceptable for ownership and maintenance by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
The CDA will accept ownership of such roads and enter into an agreement with Developer
regarding the maintenance thereof. To the extent permitted by applicable Federal income tax
laws and regulations so as to not adversely affect the tax-exempt status of the Bonds, ownership
of the roads will revert to the Developer or its successors and assigns (which may include a
property owners' association comprised of some or all of the property owners within the CDA
District) under such terms and conditions as the CDA and the Developer agree.
(b) The Developer and the CDA agree that no payments will be requested by the
CDA from the County other than the payments described herein. The Bonds will not constitute a
debt or pledge of the full faith and credit of the County and will not impose any liability on the
County and the documents pursuant to which the Bonds are issued and sold will contain a
statement to that effect inform satisfactory to the County.
(c) The Developer (1) will enter into guaranteed maximum price contracts, stipulated
lump sum contracts or similar fixed price contracts for the design and construction of the
Improvements and (2) will obtain payment and performance bonds and/or completion bonds
from the general contractor for such contracts acceptable to the County Administrator. Before
delivery of such guaranteed maximum price contracts or similar fixed price contracts and bonds,
Bond proceeds will be expended only for costs of issuing the Bonds and for capitalized interest
payments and no Bond proceeds will be expended for design and construction of the
Improvements until such contracts and payment and performance and/or completion bonds have
been delivered.
~ ~~30044
(d) The CDA will sell the Bonds only in minimum denominations of $100,000 and
$1,000 increments in excess of $100,000.
(e) The CDA agrees to comply with the continuing disclosure requirements of
Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 even if the Bonds are exempt from such
Rule and to furnish copies of all filings under such Rule to the County Administrator within 15
days after filing. The Developer and the County shall cooperate with the CDA and shall
endeavor to provide information with respect to the Developer, the Improvements and the
Special Assessment and Incremental Tax Revenues, as appropriate, reasonably requested by the
CDA in connection with the CDA's disclosure obligations.
(~ The CDA will cooperate in all material and reasonable respects with County in
the administration by the County of the CDA's financial affairs including the preparation of an
annual report of such financial affairs. Unless otherwise approved by the County, the CDA's
audited financial statements will be audited by the auditor engaged by the County to audit the
County's financial statements. The fiscal year of the CDA shall be from July 1 through June 30.
(g) The Developer and the CDA agree that the Improvements will be built in
accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations and that the
Improvements to be acquired by the County will be built in compliance with all applicable
specifications of the County.
6. Approved Budget and Notice of Appropriation. The County shall furnish to
the Developer, the CDA and the Trustee for the Bonds as soon as available a copy of the
approved budget of the County for the next succeeding fiscal year of the County. The County
Administrator shall deliver to the CDA and to the Trustee for the Bonds within 10 days after the
beginning of each of the County's fiscal years a written notice specifying the amounts
appropriated by the Board of Supervisors to, or on behalf of, the CDA during such fiscal year.
The County agrees to notify the Trustee for the Bonds and each Nationally Recognized
Municipal Securities Information Repository and any State Information Depository within the
Commonwealth of Virginia in the event the Board of Supervisors fails to appropriate any
amounts payable hereunder by the County.
7. Prerequisites to Issuance of Bonds. The CDA agrees that it will not issue
Bonds until the Developer has satisfied the prerequisites set forth in this paragraph and the
conditions to the issuance of the Bonds set forth in the Land Sale Agreement. The Developer
agrees that it will provide the following to the County in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to the County before the issuance of the Bonds:
(a) such information and assurances as are necessary to complete the disclosure
documents prepared in connection with the sale of the Bonds; and
(b) such engineering and other reports regarding the Improvements and the Project as
the County shall reasonably require.
8. Approval by County. Any approval or consent required of the County under this
Memorandum may be given by the County Administrator or such officer's designee unless
action by the Board of Supervisors is expressly required.
$ 0~30~J45
9. Successors and Assigns. This Memorandum shall be binding upon, inure to the
benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and assigns.
10. Amendments. This Memorandum may be amended only in writing signed by
each of the parties hereto or their successors and assigns.
11. Term. This Memorandum shall be in full force and effect until all Bonds have
been paid or deemed no longer outstanding under the Indenture.
12. Severabili . If any clause, provision or section of this Memorandum is held to
be illegal or invalid by any court, the invalidity of the clause, provision or section shall not affect
any of the remaining clauses, provisions or sections, and this Memorandum shall be construed
and enforced as if the illegal or invalid clause, provision or section had not been contained in it.
13. Counterparts. This Memorandum may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which together shall
constitute but one and the same instrument.
14. Re=. The recitals set forth at the beginning of this Memorandum are
incorporated into and made a part of this Memorandum as though they were fully set forth in this
Section 14 and constitute representations and understandings of the parties hereto.
15. Governing Law and Venue. This Memorandum shall be governed by the laws
of the Commonwealth of Virginia without regard to its conflict of law rules. Any action or
dispute arising out of this Memorandum that cannot be resolved among the parties shall be
resolved in the Chesterfield County Circuit Court or in the United States District Court, Eastern
District of Virginia, Richmond Division and in no other forum.
16. No=. Any notice, request or other deliveries required to be given hereunder
shall be deemed given if sent by registered or certified mail, or overnight delivery service,
postage prepaid, addressed to the following addresses:
County: County of Chesterfield
9901 Lori Road
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832-0400
Attention: County Administrator
Facsimile Number: (804) 717-6297
with a copy to: County of Chesterfield
9901 Lori Road
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23 832-0400
Attention: County Attorney
Facsimile Number: (804) 717-6297
OOO~J46
9
CDA: Chippenham Place Community Development Authority
c/o County of Chesterfield
Department of Budget and Management
9901 Lori Road
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23 832-0400
Facsimile Number: (804) 751-4988
with a copy to: Hunton & Williams LLP
Riverfront Plaza -East Tower
951 East Byrd Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Attention: John D. O'Neill, Jr.
Facsimile Number: (804) 788-8218
Developer: Stonebridge Realty Holdings LLC
227 West Trade Street, Suite 800
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Attention: James F. Downs
Facsimile Number: (704) 523-2946
with a copy to: K&L Gates LLP
214 North Tryon Street
Hearst Tower, 47th Floor
Charlottes, North Carolina 28202
Attention: David H. Jones, Esquire
Facsimile Number: (704) 353-3181
Any party may designate any other addresses for notices or requests or other deliveries by
giving notice under this Section 16.
ooo~~~
10
WITNESS the following signatures.
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
By•
Title: County Administrator
CHIPPENHAM PLACE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By•
Title: Chairman
STONEBRIDGE REALTY HOLDINGS LLC
By:_
Title:
11
OfiD0~4~
The undersigned Treasurer of the County executes this Memorandum for purposes of agreeing to
the provisions of Paragraph 4.
Name:
Treasurer
Exhibit A -Map Depicting Property
Exhibit B - Description of Improvements
Exhibit C -Ordinance
Exhibit D -Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Assessment
~~0049
12
24190.000197 EMF_US 26275375v6
N
W
V
._
.~
H
A~
W
N
h
0
N
V
.~
0
r-
O
W
4~
V
O
V
.~
~+-
L
h
N
4~
4~
V
.~ O
A= L
W
-}- O
H ~
~ ~
~_
~ ~
~ ~
= O
= N
.~ L
~_
O
•~
L
O~ .~'
~ H
~ `~
~ ~
.~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ -
~ V
Q .~
M
AH
W
e
0
.~
N
.~
.~
4~
d'
O
L.
L
0
V
.~
O
.~
V
.~
i
H
N
._
.-~
M
~~~
_~
W
H
s .~ ~
~ i
N1
H
i ~
~
~ ~ ~
o _ ~
~
N
t O
~^~, i
~~
~.~ x,
x ' ,,,
_ . ~"t i
. r ,
~~ - j
} ''~t;##
O >.
a~ ~
H r
N
s ~ ~
V H
~ t ~
~ ~ Q
N
i
i
O
~
~ ~
o
.~
_~ _
.~
~
}
O y ~
~ ~ ~ ~
O ~ O
0 O O
~
M
.~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.1.
Subject:
Nomination/Reappointments to the Agricultural and Forestry Committee
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Reques
Request the Board to nominate/reappoint members to serve on the Agricultural
and Forestry Committee.
Summary of Information:
The terms of the current membership of the Agricultural and Forestry
Committee expired on December 31, 2010. The members, Mark Landa, representing
the Bermuda District; Howard Nester, representing the Dale District; Claire
Durham, representing the Midlothian District; Stephen P. Lindberg, at-large
member representing the forestry business; Stuart Jones, at-large member
representing the agriculture business; Wayne Campbell, representing the
Matoaca District; and George Beadles, representing the Clover Hill District,
have indicated their willingness to continue to serve as members of the
Agricultural and Forestry Committee and have submitted applications. No
additional applications were received. Board members concur with
reappointment of the current members. The terms will expire December 31,
2012.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees
are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless
the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members
present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated.
The Board of Supervisors concurs with these appointments.
Preparers T. Michael Likins
Attachments: ~ Yes
Title: Director of Cooperative Extension
^ No # 0~0`J5U
ti~~~°G
~~
..~... ~.
1749
~RGIN~'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.2.
Subject:
Nomination/Appointment to the Personnel Appeals Board
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Reque
The Board of Supervisors is requested to nominate/appoint a new member to
serve on the Personnel Appeals Board.
Summary of Information:
The purpose of the Personnel Appeals Board is to hear employee grievances
relating to disciplinary actions or discriminatory application of county
personnel regulations. The Personnel Appeals Board has the ability to modify
or reverse disciplinary decisions of department directors. The appointments
are for athree-year term and are not related to residing in a particular
magisterial district.
Mr. Victor Branch's second term on the Personnel Appeals Board expired on
December 31, 2010, and he is not eligible to serve another term. The Board
of Supervisors is requested to nominate and appoint Mr. Steven C. Bowman to
serve the next full term, which would begin immediately upon appointment and
end on December 31, 2013. Mr. Bowman has indicated his willingness to serve
and has submitted an application. A total of 11 applications were received
from persons interested in serving on the Personnel Appeals Board. Board
members concur with the appointment of Mr. Bowman.
Under existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to boards and committees are
nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting, unless the
Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members
present. Nominees are voted on in the order in which they are nominated.
Preparers Marv Martin Selby Title: Director, Human Resource Services
Attachments:
^ Yes No # (,~~~QS~.
,~
~~_
~r~s '`
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 8.B.
Subject:
Streetlight dust Approval
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Reque~te~d:
This item requests Board approval of a streetlight installation in the Clover
Hill District.
Summary of Information:
Requests for streetlights, from individual citizens or civic groups, are
received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost
quotations from Dominion Virginia Power for each request received. when the
quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at
the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for
consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request
based on the following criteria:
1. Streetlights should be located at intersections and
2. A petition is required which must be signed by 75 percent of the
residents within 200 feet of the proposed light and shall include a
majority of the homeowners living at the proposed locations.
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
Preparers
Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #
OOO~J~2
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2
AGENDA
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Cost quotations from Dominion Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60
days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer,
or deny the expenditure of funds from available District Improvement Funds
for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff
authorizes Dominion Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial of a
project will result in its cancellation and the District Improvement Fund
will be charged the design cost shown; staff will notify the requestor of the
denial. Projects cannot be deferred for more than 30 days due to quotation
expiration. Quotation expiration has the same effect as a denial.
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT:
• In the Watkins Glen subdivision
At the intersection of Sandy Ridge Parkway and Watkins Glen Road
Cost to install streetlight: $1,813.21
(Design Cost: $750.001
Meets minimum criteria
For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement Fund
accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report.
oooo~~
STREETLIGHT REQUEST
Clover Hill District
Request Received: October 13, 2010
Estimate Requested: October 14, 2010
Estimate Received: January 10, 2011
Days Estimate Outstanding: 89
NAME OF REQUESTOR: Mr. AI Raimo
ADDRESS: Assistant Community Manager,
Brandermill Community Association
3001 East Boundary Terrace
Midlothian, VA 23112
REQUESTED LOCATION:
Intersection of Sandy Ridge Parkway and Watkins Glen Road
Costto install light: $1,813.21
POLICY CRITERIA:
Intersection: Qualified
Petition: Qualified
Requestor Comments: None
Staff notes that while this request is for a premium style light, the application pre-dates the December
1, 2010, revision to the streetlight policy. The Board has the options of approving or denying the
a lication as is, or deferring it until staff can obtain an updated cost using the basic fixtures specified
pp
in the revised policy.
~~~~
Streetlight Request Map
This map is a copyrighted product of N
the Chestertield County GIS Office. This map shows citizen requested
Streetli ht Le end streetlight installations in relation
g g to existing streetlights.
Existing Streetlights Existing streetlight information was
obtained from the Chestertield County
• Environmental Engineering Department.
Requested Streetlight
350 175 0 350 Feet
January 26, 2011
~,~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2
~ ~,. AGENDA
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.1.
Subject:
Award of Annual Requirements Contract for Pharmacy Services for the Sheriff's
Office, Juvenile Detention Home, Community Services Board and Risk
Management's Workers Compensation
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Reques
Award annual requirements contract to MAO Pharmacy, Inc.
Summary of Information:
This annual requirements contract provides pharmacy services for Sheriff's
Office jail inmates, Juvenile Detention Home detainees, Community Services
Board consumers, and County/School employees served by Risk Management's
workers compensation program. It is a one-year contract with up to four one-
year renewals. Based on historical trends, the estimated annual value of this
contract is $521,000; however, actual costs realized will fluctuate based on
utilization needs of the individual departments that will vary throughout the
year. Six proposals were received in response to the competitive negotiation
procurement process that was advertised. A team made up of Purchasing staff
and representatives from each of the impacted departments reviewed these
proposals and determined that MAO Pharmacy, Inc. made the best proposal to
meet the needs of the county. The unit cost negotiated for this contract is
lower than pricing currently being paid by the county. The Sheriff's Office
is preparing this agenda item on behalf of all involved county departments.
Preparers
Dennis S. Proffitt
Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No
0~0~~6
Title: Sheriff
ti4~coo
~~
1749
~ecn~~'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Budget and Management Comments:
This item requests that the Board authorize the County Administrator to
award an annual requirements contract to MAO Pharmacy, Inc. (Westwood
Pharmacy) for pharmacy services. The contract, with an estimated value of
$521,000, is for one year with an option to renew for four one-year terms.
The estimated start date is March 1, 2011. This contract will provide
services for the Sheriff's Office jail inmates, Juvenile Detention home
detainees, Community Services Board consumers, and County/School employees
served by Risk Management's workers compensation program. Sufficient
funding was included for pharmacy services in the adopted FY2011 budget and
will be included as part of the FY2012 proposed financial plan.
Preparers Allan M. Carmody
Title: Director, Budget and Management
Qfl045'7
-~ { ~ ~~
I'
rtrM1 ~ , - -- ~;` h4h
~~~~ ~;
~~ ~~.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.2.a.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Sergeant Thomas C. Kohorst, Police Department, Upon
His Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Sergeant Thomas C. Kohorst retired from the Police Department after having
provided over 22 years of service to the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Preparers Colonel Thierry G_. Dupuis
Title: Chief of Police
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
# O~O~J58
RECOGNIZING SERGEANT THOMAS C. KOHORST UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Sergeant Thomas C. Kohorst will retire from the Chesterfield
County Police Department on February 1, 2011 after providing over 22 years of
quality service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kohorst has faithfully served the county in the
capacity of Patrol Officer, Senior Police Officer, and Sergeant; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure with the department, Sergeant Kohorst served
as Field Training Officer, Breathalyzer Operator, Street Drug Enforcement
Unit member, Police Aviation Officer (Pilot) , where he was assigned to the
Metro Aviation Unit, and served with the Police Department's Honor Guard; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kohorst has obtained the rank of Lt. Colonel in the
Virginia Army National Guard and displays outstanding leadership qualities
indicative of his military training and achievement, which is an asset to the
citizens of the county; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kohorst initiated an aviation ride-along program,
which helped to meet working objectives of his shift and helped to build
morale with the officers; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kohorst has served as the Incident Commander of
several significant police operations in both the Uniform Operations Bureau
and Criminal Investigations Division; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kohorst is recognized for his organizational skills
and abilities, which he has utilized in special assignments within his tenure
with the Police Department; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kohorst has received numerous letters of commendation,
thanks and appreciation from the citizens of Chesterfield County for service
rendered; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Kohorst has provided the Chesterfield County Police
Department with many years of loyal and dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors will miss
Sergeant Kohorst's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors recognizes Sergeant Thomas C. Kohorst, and extends on behalf of
its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County appreciation for his
service to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best wishes
for a long and happy retirement.
0~0~~9
.~~`J~ ..c,,,,
::~ ~<.
~'U- ~;.
E ~ I
~~, r: ~ ~.
r, i7~e
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 201 Item Number: 8.C.2.b.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Ms. Florence B. Burnley, Utilities Department, Upon
Her Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognize
Ms. Florence Burnley for her 29 years of service to the Utilities Department
and the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Preparer : Roy E. Covin., tq on
Attachments: ^ Yes
Title: Director of Utilities
RECOGNIZING MS. FLORENCE B. BURNLEY UPON HER RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Ms. Florence B. Burnley will retire from Chesterfield County's
Department of Utilities on February 1, 2011; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley began her public service as a Home Health Aide with the
Chesterfield Health Department from 1966 to 1969, and then continued her public
service on July 13, 1981, as an Account Clerk for Chesterfield County's Department
of Utilities; and
WHEREAS, in recognition of her dedication, skills and exceptional job
performance throughout the course of her career, Ms. Burnley has received several
romotions and numerous certificates of recognition for teamwork, customer service
P
and years of dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley has been an asset to the Utilities Department because
of her unique aptitude and ability related to customer service and her dedication
to her job as exemplified by her volunteering for additional duties and arriving
to the office early to assist in completing work; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley's position was reclassified to Senior Customer Service
Representative in 2004 to reflect its demanding responsibilities; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley was responsible for the accurate calculation of fees
for utility system connections from residential, industrial and commercial
customers; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley has exhibited dedication, knowledge, pride and quality
in the work she has performed at the Utilities Department; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley willingly served numerous internal customers and many
external customers, including builders and developers, in the most courteous and
professional manner; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley has significant knowledge and excellent leadership
skills and has assisted in training, mentoring and developing employees in the New
Construction Services Section to help them become successful; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley was instrumental in implementing the Project Tracking
System in the New Construction Services Section in 1991 tO accept utility project
information and connection fees; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley learned and became proficient on the EB Enterprise Work
Place system to locate information on archived projects; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Burnley learned and mastered the PUMA GIS (Arc View) software
to ensure that New Construction personnel had the correct addresses for newly
developed county parcels and subdivision plats for accurate input into the Project
Tracking system. ~®~~~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors recognizes Ms. Florence B. Burnley and extends on behalf of its
members and the citizens of Chesterfield County appreciation for her twenty-nine
years of dedicated service to the county.
o~o~~~
,.>
~`` "y~,,
~~~.~ .~.
_ .~ ~~
~. ~.~.
`, ,/~ 1749`, ~ %~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.2.c.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Mr. Emmett D. Jones, Utilities Department, Upon His
Retirement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Staff requests that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognize
Mr. Emmett D. Jones for his 36 years of service to the Utilities Department
and the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Preparers Roy E. Covington Title: Director of Utilities
Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No #
O~O~J~3
RECOGNIZING MR. EMMETT D. "DANNY" JONES UPON HIS RETIREMENT
WHEREAS, Mr. Emmett D. "Danny" Jones will retire from Chesterfield County's
Department of Utilities on February 14, 2011; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jones began his public service with Chesterfield County on
November 21, 1974, as a Meter Reader for the Department of Utilities; and
WHEREAS, in recognition for his unique aptitude and ability related to reading
water meters and executing service orders, volunteering for additional duties, and
working many hours of overtime, Mr. Jones was promoted to Service Order Technician in
1979 in the Field Services Section of the Utilities Department and diligently served
in that capacity for four years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jones was promoted to Field Services Supervisor in 1983, and
reclassified to Customer Operations Supervisor in 2004, because of his significant
knowledge of Chesterfield County's streets, roads and subdivisions and his leadership
skills in mentoring, training, and supervising Meter Readers and Field Service
Representatives for many years; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jones has exhibited exceptional job skills, dedication, knowledge,
pride and quality in the work he has performed at the Utilities Department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jones willingly served numerous internal customers and over
100,000 external customers in the most courteous and professional manner during his
employment with the Utilities Department; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jones used his excellent leadership skills to develop many new and
successful employees in the Field Services Section; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jones was instrumental in implementing an automated Meter Reading
System by Itron in the Field Services Section to enhance meter reading efficiency and
accuracy, and under the Itron system, he mastered the operation of the Premier meter
reading software system, the Enterprise 5000 meter reading software system and later
the MVRS software system; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jones also learned and used the Automated Reading Management
System, which enabled him to optimize meter reading routes and cycles for many years;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jones learned and mastered the PUMA GIS (Arc View? software and
used that knowledge to assist co-workers in the Field Services Section,
Billing/Customer Service Section, Construction Section, New Construction Section and
various other sections of the Utilities Department to enable field personnel to
locate water meters and water lines throughout the county.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors recognizes Mr. Emmett D. "Danny" Jones and extends on behalf of its
members and the citizens of Chesterfield County appreciation for his thirty-six years
of service to the county.
a~Q~J~4
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2
AGENDA
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.2.d.
Subject:
Resolution Supporting the Virginia Department of Transportation's Modified
Option for Replacing the Genito Road Three-Ton Weight Restricted Bridge West
of Woolridge Road
County Administrator's Comments•
County Administrator:
The Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution supporting the
Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT) modified option for replacing
the Genito Road three-ton weight restricted bridge, west of Woolridge Road.
Summary of Information:
In January of 2010, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) placed a
three-ton weight limit on the Genito Road bridge just west of Woolridge Road.
The bridge was previously limited to 12 tons. The three-ton limit was
imposed due to structural deterioration of the bridge.
Genito Road is a major arterial serving many residences in the northwestern
section of the county. Genito Road carries approximately 8,000 vehicles per
day. Fire and Emergency Medical Services response times to parts of the area
will improve if the bridge is replaced.
(Continued on next page)
Preparers R.J.McCracken Title: Director of Transportation
Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No #
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2
AGENDA
Summary of Information: continued
VDOT made a presentation on November 15, 2010, at a Matoaca District meeting,
on two options (see attached summaries) for replacing the restricted bridge
with a new bridge. Approximately 50 citizens attended. VDOT's preferred
option included closing Genito Road for five months while a new bridge is
constructed. Traffic will be detoured to Otterdale Road and other roads
while Genito Road is closed. After the meeting, VDOT received 29 comments,
24 supporting VDOT's preferred option.
VDOT requested the county's concurrence with their recommended option. Staff
supports VDOT's proposal to replace the bridge but has concerns that
Otterdale Road is not adequate to accommodate the detoured traffic.
Ms. Durfee, VDOT and staff met in early January to discuss methods for
modifying VDOT's proposal. VDOT has now modified the scope of the bridge
replacement project (see attached Option 3) so that Genito Road will only be
closed for two months, safety improvements will be made to Otterdale Road
prior to detouring traffic and the project construction has been accelerated
by a full year. VDOT would like the county to manage, at VDOT expense, the
right-of-way acquisition and utility relocations.
Staff recommends the Board adopt the attached resolution supporting VDOT's
modified option for the bridge replacement. The Board should also authorize
staff to manage the right-of-way acquisition and utility relocations for the
project .
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the Board:
1) adopt the attached resolution supporting VDOT's modified option for
replacing the Genito Road three-ton weight restricted bridge west of
Woolridge Road, and
2) authorize staff to manage, at VDOT expense, the right of way acquisit
and utility relocations, in our customary fashion.
Districts: Matoaca, Clover Hill
VDOT ACTIONS FOR REPLACING GENITO ROAD THREE-TON WEIGHT
RESTRICTED BRIDGE
Option 1 (VDOT's initial referred option)
• The estimated cost to replace the bridge is $3.7 million; VDOT says this option is
fully funded.
• The new bridge would be a two-lane bridge with 15-foot (including 3 feet at curb)
wide lanes. The minimum bridge width would be 38 feet.
• The new bridge would be in the same location as the existing bridge.
• VDOT says the new bridge would take five months to construct.
• VDOT proposes to include contractual incentives for early completion and
disincentives for late completion.
• Water quality impacts are minimal.
• Genito Road would be closed during construction. Traffic would be detoured to
Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road, Charter Colony Parkway and Watermill Parkway. The
detour is approximately five miles.
• Construction would begin in April 2013 and be completed by September 2013.
tioa 2
• The estimated cost to replace the bridge is $7.2 million: VDOT says they would
need an additional $2.5 million to fund this option.
• The new bridge would be a two-lane bridge with 15-foot (including 3 feet at curb)
wide lanes. The minimum bridge width would be 38 feet.
• The new bridge would be constructed just downstream of the existing bridge.
• VDOT says the new bridge would take 24 months to construct under this option.
• Genito Road would remain open: a detour would not be required. Some delays would
occur during construction.
• VDOT proposes to include contractual incentives for early completion and
disincentives for late completion.
• Water quality impacts for this option are more significant than VDOT's preferred
option.
• Construction would begin July 2015 and be completed by July 2017.
Option 3 (VDOT's Modified Optioa - Recommended)
• The estimated cost to replace the bridge is still approximately $4 million; VDOT says
this option is fully funded.
• VDOT would design a bridge and use construction techniques that will enable a short
construction time with reduced traffic disruption and detour.
• The new bridge would be a two-lane bridge.
• The new bridge would be in the same location as the existing bridge.
• VDOT says the new bridge would take seven months to construct but Genito Road would
only be closed for two months.
• VDOT proposes to include contractual incentives for early completion and
disincentives for late completion.
• Water quality impacts are minimal.
• When Genito Road is closed during construction, traffic would be detoured to
Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road, Charter Colony Parkway and Watermill Parkway. The
detour is approximately five miles. VDOT has agreed to make improvements (place
stone in ditch lines, remove trees close to edge of pavement, improve sight distance
at intersections, etc.) to Otterdale Road before the detour is put in place.
• VDOT has also agreed to include provisions in their construction contract to insure
the county would have adequate access to the water line along Genito Road during
construction and provisions prohibiting refueling of construction equipment on site
to reduce the risk of contamination of the reservoir.
WHEREAS, Genito Road carries over 8,000 vehicles per day; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is
responsible for the maintenance of Genito Road; and
WHEREAS, VDOT has placed a three-ton weight restriction on the
Genito Road bridge west of Woolridge Road because of structural
deficiencies; and
WHEREAS, VDOT presented, at a Matoaca District community
meeting on November 15,2010, two options for replacing the weight
restricted bridge with a new bridge; and
WHEREAS, VDOT has requested Chesterfield County's support for
their preferred option for replacing the bridge; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the community meeting, VDOT officials
and county representatives discussed modifications to VDOT's
preferred option; and
WHEREAS, VDOT has modified their option so that, among other
things, Genito Road will be closed for a shorter time, safety
improvements will be made to Otterdale Road before traffic is
detoured, and the construction of the project will be completed no
later than 2012; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County wishes to express its thanks to
VDOT for their cooperation and willingness to modify the option for
replacing the bridge.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors supports VDOT's modified option for replacing
the restricted Genito Road bridge.
VDOT INFO SHEET
What is Option #1?
Replace the existing bridge on the existing alignment. This will include widening the lanes to 15 feet with three
feet of the lane to accommodate bicyclists.
When would construction start?
Construction is anticipated to begin in spring 2013.
How long will it take to complete the project?
If construction starts in spring 2013, completion would be in September 2013.
How much will this option cost?
Total project cost (includes design, right of way and construction) is $3.7 million.
Is the project funded?
Yes.
Will the bridge be closed during construction?
Yes. The bridge would need to be closed for approximately five months for replacement. The existing roadway
is not wide enough to accommodate traffic AND a complete bridge replacement at the same time. Plus,
construction staging is not practical on the current alignment due to the existing bridge's structural layout.
Genito Road (Route 604)
Option #1 -Bridge Replacement
Chesterfield
What is the detour? (see attached map)
The detour begins at Otterdale Road to Old Hundred Road; from Old Hundred Road to Watermill Road;
Watermill Road to Genito Road. The detour route is approximately five miles long and will take the average
driver approximately eight minutes to travel.
Are there any impacts to the reservoir?
Yes; however, water quality impacts are minimal.
Are there any properties impacted by the project?
Yes. The lake bed is privately owned and the impacted properties are submerged land.
Will my input affect VDOT's decision?
Yes. VDOT is committed to moving forward with a plan that the public will support. Your feedback will be used
to determine which option fits with the needs of the community.
Where can I submit my comments?
Please use the comment sheet provided or a-mail your comments by November 25 to Jennifer.Sal~(~VDOT.Vir inia ov.
VDOT INFO SHEET
What is Option #2?
Replace the existing bridge on a new alignment. This will include widening the lanes to 15 feet with three feet of
the lane to accommodate bicyclists.
When would construction start?
Construction is anticipated to begin in summer 2015 (contingent on funding).
How long will it take to complete the project?
If construction starts in summer 2015, completion would be in 2017.
How much will this option cost?
Total project cost (includes design, right of way and construction) is $7.2 million.
Is the project funded? If not, can VDOT use surplus money found in the recent agency audit?
No, the project is not funded in the Six Year Plan. Any surplus funds resulting from the recent VDOT audit will
be allocated during the Six Year planning process in spring 2011. The Commonwealth Transportation Board
will make the final decision on what projects will receive surplus funds following input from the public and local
officials.
Genito Road (Route 604)
Option #2 -Bridge Replacement
Cheste~eld
Will the bridge be closed during construction?
No. With the bridge being built on a new alignment adjacent to the existing bridge, drivers would continue to
use the existing bridge during construction.
Are there any impacts to the reservoir?
Yes. The project design will incorporate stormwater management treatment to reduce water quality and quantity
impacts. Also, a higher level of permitting will be required for the project.
Are there any properties impacted by the project?
Yes. It is anticipated that at least four properties will be impacted.
Will my input affect VDOT's decision?
Yes. VDOT is committed to moving forward with a plan that the public will support. Your feedback will be used
to determine which option fits with the needs of the community.
Where can I submit my comments?
Please use the comment sheet provided or a-mail your comments by November 25 to Jennifer.Salyers(a~VDOT Vir inia ~.
DETOURS
DETOUR
5A2 MILES LONG
8.2 MINUTES TO TRAVEL
ORIGINAL ROUTE
1.3 MILES LONG
1 MINUTE TO TRAVEL
`~ y~
OLD HUNDRED ROA13
OTTERDALE ROAD
WATERMILL PARKWAY
3 TON BRIDGE
DETOUR
4.7 MILES LONG
6 MINUTES TO TRAVEL
ORIGINAL ROUTE
4.3 MILES LONG
6 MINUTES TO TRAVEL
v
'-_OTTERDALE ROAD
t3EN1Tt3 RC7~tL1.
f'~ ~ ~
~~1\.~' WDOLRIE~Ki~ f~OAD
~,~ r
(QLD HUNDRED 120AD
WATERMIIL PARKWAY
3 TON BRIDGE
1MOOLRIDGf= #tORD ~
- ~
~~~
,f~~ ~~~H y V'r{,
s :~ ~~ 'r
f~ -- 6
~~;
,;.
-,.
~~y.~~~ ,
~~~~ ~ ~-
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 2010 Item Number: 8.C.3.
Subject:
Acceptance of Parcels of Land South of Hull Street Road from Skinquarter
Land, LLC
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Regues~e~':
Accept the conveyance of three parcels of land containing a total of 1.14
acres from Skinquarter Land, LLC, and authorize the County Administrator to
execute the deed.
Summary of Information:
It is the policy of the county to acquire right of way whenever possible
through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County
Thoroughfare Plan . The dedication of these parcels conforms to that plan,
and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when
constructed.
Approval is recommended.
DiStYICt: Matoaca
Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # O'~O~~iS
VICINITY SKETCH
Acceptance of Parcels of Land South of Hull
Street Road from Skinquarter Land, LLC
~~ ~~~ ~~
~~~~
r
I
I
t
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
1
4.~~8 Acre Dedication
~.~~1 Acre Dedi cation
~,~ J!
~~
~~
~,
'~
~'~
~,
,ti
~~
~~,
,~
~~,
~~
'~~
,~~
~~
~~
~~
~,
~ ~,
~,
~ ~,
~,
0.21 Acre Dedication
~ Chesterfield Caunty pepartment of Utilities
~~~
~~ ~~
T
i Ilri --xi-~.h' 1~et
o~ao~s
4~
~~
~~
~ _
C
°, a ~
~ ~ ~ -~
~~~~N~
~ N ~' ~ m
~ ~
~~~°w
~ N~~QI~
Ow Z~ C
1 ? N ~ ~
~ Cr-
.r -+
W
N
/ \~
~`~
~l
~O
44~~ \\
\\
~~
,~,
gVqc~alr:~
~6V~ ~ ~
\\
m~~ ~ w /
n 1
- ~'
/ is-i~-
~r 9 - . v
~, ,
N~ ---
/~ V ~i ;,-
I~ /~ '~
~ i~ ~~ ~ ~
~^~~
~ a~ ~
~:
~ -;
-
q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --~~9t~t5
~~ - - ib
m ~~ ~ -- ~
a
;~ ~= -~-
~\ Z~ V\ ~i -~// _
~' ~ ~~ ~ -ice ~~~- , - N -
~ - pt3
\~~ .~ , - o I ~'
N I
J ` \
J
v
-~'~
;~ ~ ~
w ~ ~~~
N ~ ~~+.
~ # 0 ~\
~ ~~~
\\~~
~~~
~ a \\
~~~
#~~~
t~ / ~
~~
~~
~~z
Vq~
~v~
~N~
ti~
~~
~n
~~
~ w \~~ ~ ~' fit/ ~~~
G yi3~~^Jj~ V ~~~~ /%
/ ` v -i //
~i i
~ ~i Q~" j/
n O Z \ ~tn \ ~ i~ ~ `1 ~
~ i~ ~ ///
w~\ ~ ~ ~~! ESQ ,~ i i ~ `~ ~ / /
~ 1 9
II '"" 1112 ~ / ~/ ~. ~~~~
N I yr / / ~ ~
o ~ ~~~ /// x,19 ~~~~~ ~~~~
p ~~n ~A / j/ ~~O ~ ti
rq 'o xm m ~~ ~ ~ N a /i/ ~ ~ ti
i
~ ti~~°t ~ 6B QYN
~: ~
oo~ ~ ~
rnc,~o ~ ..
~~~ 00
'~ ~ T
Cn .~ ' I ro
Ul ~ _- o
O
O
ra<V+' r m. ~ pm n r~aa )
A ~ _ ~ ~ IYfcNA~rfr~~llmf}yyl~pluYrsrya~~y /1n~a ~zs c~ u~yn1mW~/~1Ip ~ ~ o ~~1 ~xn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , - ~ ~
~_ m ~ ~ Z KNV~iGY /V -nL YNR~/~ K ~i l~ ~vI vw~/f~wr a o S o 3 0 u ~ r o ~ ~ R ~ ° n ~ m ~ m
m m A~E~S EIS~OVr M171NNI71Nr7~lt~l'E NDIN SN~{/~1hP ° d 3 ~ a ~ N ~' < 3 ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~
~ O PAS n _~~ a= ~ u~P.9.~~ ~ • ~
Vl ~ :{ GA7GI~J~~J MINJIIN I!i I/rA1H K ~MryM~ ~Ln awry KY U ,~m,1+ F a J ~ '~ ~ S. ~ N 1 0 S Q~Q (ipii
r3 ~ ~ Noa D ~~~; W~u " aQO~ ~f° c~ ^4
o ~ D MATOACA DISTRICT ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ N n ~ m ° s
~ ~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINUI a ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~
.'%t" ~,
~1 J
/ ~~
~~
~~
b
~~~
~~y~ ~~
~~~
~~
~~~
oooo~~
- :,~jgt % It~t % ~ ~ ~ ~1 w
1
- ~'---fit '~
~ ~
-i--~ ~ X11
- i' ~ ;~a~
- ~ ~ ,~ ,:
Np
O
W
n
O
oW
O
W
01
7
G~~ n n n n n n n n n n ~
..v~.~.~.~. ~.v.,~.nn~nnnnrr n t~~~
#~r~V v b4V °f0#~v~V vObaDVON#w~tv N
2cn2 2Zh~i~i~nh2 2 yy b~n2 ,.
v., vv Vv ~. VV VV
q~~~~~~q~~~gti~ti~w~~ ww 8~~
V ~~00 VIr ~N VI N Nr O" V
~~~VaB$&b~VbO~ObVb~tititi~N
~ti~
6 ti
~+V C
~~ ~~
~~
~~
q~
~~~
ti
~ti
2~~
~~'°
~~~~
O~n2
~~~~
~o~~
~by0
pOp2n
00~
O
~~
0 ..
~~jZ
~~F
c~ ~
v~
~ ~~
n
cor
mx~ ~ ~~
o~
N O `~ ~.
'~~ O N f0
G~ ~ ~ ~,V
~ v ~ ~
riN~~
?~~
o~+°~
~o~~
w~,S=
tign~
0
~A~~
# ~
#~~
R~n
n
66d66d r
~~o~o
~~2~~~,
i~
~
~
~ 4
4
~Z~O~~
~
~
2~~
~oa
~
~
'Ci2`~~
~~~~~
~ 2~~~~
~_ ~ ~a
~w ~ ~~~o
~ z~~~
O
ti ~
~ °j
~ ~mm~C
nOn~~
~
~ j
y~
y
~~~~ pf) ~,sg~59t) V
l%~.~ \
,fZfp ~ v& ~o~ ~\
~~
~ ~ 8v ~ \ -
\1 11 ~ ~ ~,\\\\ ~-
~ \ v-
Q
~ ~ C
~
~ ~ ~ - ~w~~ ~
~
~ 1 ~ G ~-
~
`
` N111t~~ ~
~N ~'$~
i o yO~~I
`
` ~
~ 1
1
1 ~~
~~
~ ~I
1 ~
1 Li
1 ` ~,
~w Of
~~~~ "~ 1
a ~~~ ` \ S`1
y1
•J
n ` \ V•
~~
~~ ~~ ~ ` `
` -
~
~ y~ ~ ~ \ ~-
n
\
\ ~-
~-
1
1 r~
1 ~~''` _~ ~~-
~
~~~~ ~
NI
r-1
1
~, `L.gt l)
~ 9~~t5
y 3" X11 ~'9f~ttt) ~
'9~,~p ~~~ v
2~a
pl,gf,9~~`~-vZ
~fp9 i U
~~~
~ ~ ~~ ~
~~~ ~
~
'`~,
2~~
0j02
bv~ ~~
2~~
~~~ ~
~
~~
m
~Vr~
y~
h O
~~
~~
b
~~~~
I~
°° ~~
~ a
o~
O n
o
g
y
~~
G~
K
"~ ~J
V -
:O ,
~:
I
O
~~
~~~
o~
~o
~~
~~
'$ i
m
~ ~ z ~ o v
g _ CONlALED PUT SNOWING A f 6' DRAAIf46E FiI~IEM PG~iA^
( ), ~ ~ < ~ ~
x;~m~
3 '~' ° •
~ ~~
~
° r ~ - " ° s a ~
xao~ ~~~;~
~
o " '
~~ g
~
-1 m
~ ~ ~ ~ ..
~
~ ~ ' Q o ~ ~ n ~ ~
o , m z ~
~~
~ ° ~ ~ A YAR(~BLE WIOIN 40OT SLOPE ANY1 AZIAWCf EASEAlENL
0.028 ACRE OF LAND lO BE' OfDVlaITED >rJ 1NE COUNTY 01~'
CNES1FRflE1D, AND A SO' PRNATE ACCESS EASEIILM L 17MG U !~
o a
~ o ~ ' 3
~ m g. ~ g o
~ o ~~
~ m a ~ g
••
m ~ ~
~ o g ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~ F
~ "
~ ' S
~
W TI o ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ON INE SDUIN LAVE L#F NULL STREET RQ4D N N N ,
J " ~ ~ a ~a
~
o o v ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ° ~ " ~ ~' ° g ~ g;
R ~
~ ~ 1
~ 0 ~ ~
~ MATOACA DISTRICT ~ N
~ m +~ } c ~
~ ~
a ~
O CNESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~ f ~
ooo~~s
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
Sym.~Z' AGENDA
Meeting Date: January 26, 2010 Item Number: 8.C.4.
Subject:
Renewal of Lease of The Episcopal Church of Our Saviour to Provide Senior
Citizen Programs
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Regueste
Authorize the County Administrator to enter into a lease agreement with The
Episcopal Church of Our Saviour to provide senior citizen programs.
Summary of Information:
The Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department is sponsoring older
adult activities at satellite locations in order to better serve the
recreation needs of senior citizens. Since July 2008, successful programs
have been operated at The Episcopal Church of Our Saviour four days per week.
Activities include classes in aerobics and arts and crafts as well as special
events, such as brown bag education series and potluck luncheons. The program
is co-sponsored by the nonprofit group Chesterfield Senior Center. They work
with Parks and Recreation staff to program the activities and manage the
site. The lease will be for use of facilities Tuesday through Friday from 9
a.m, to 4 p.m. and for special events as mutually agreed. The rent is $450
per month. Funds are available in the Parks and Recreation Department budget.
Approval is recommended.
District: Midlothian
Preparer:
John W. Harmon
Title: Real Property Manager
Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget and Mana_,eq ment
Attachments: ~ Yes . No # QflO~lfi9
DATE: January 26, 2011
TO: The Honorable Board of Supervisors
FROM: John W. Hazmon, Real Property Manager
SUBJECT: Agenda Item 8.C.4.
This is to inform you that the days of operation for the Senior Center at the Episcopal Church of
Our Savior have been changed from Tuesday through Friday as indicated in the agenda item to
Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday. This change in days of operation was negotiated to
better meet the needs of the seniors using the programs. There aze no other changes in the terms
of the lease agreement.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
JWH
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service.
-~
4 ~!
~'~li
;~~.~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 8.C.5.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Grant Awarded by the United States Department of the
Interior National Parks Service Historic Preservation Fund for the Save
America's Treasures Grant Program
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requ~es~ed:
Accept and appropriate the award from the United States Department of the
Interior National Parks Service Historic Preservation Fund for the Save
America's Treasures Grant Program in the amount of $150,000 and authorize
the County Administrator to execute all documents.
Summary of Information:
The Chesterfield County General Services Department has been awarded a
$150,000 federal grant from the US Department of the Interior National
Park Service Historic Preservation Fund for the Save America's Treasures
Grant Program. The funds will be used for restoration of the exterior of
Castlewood. Acceptance of this grant requires an equal $150,000 local
match, for a total project budget of $300,000. $143,000 of the required
local match was appropriated from FY2010 results of operations, while the
remaining $7,000 will be provided via in-kind staff support.
Preparer: Robert C. Kew Title: Director of General Services
Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget and Mana eg. ment
Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # pp00'70
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2
AGENDA
Background:
Castlewood was built circa 1817-1819 by Parke Poindexter, Clerk of the
Court at Chesterfield County from 1812 until 1847. The original landowner
was Henry winfree, who received the property as a land grant in 1754.
Considered to be the finest Federal period house in Chesterfield County,
it has a five-part building plan that bears no likeness to any other
recorded dwelling in Virginia. Its unique place in the county's
architectural history makes it a fitting home for the Historical Society,
whose offices and research library are located on the first floor. In
order to retain the historic significance of one of the most historically
significant homes in the county, the plan is to restore the structure as
close to the original design and workmanship as possible. In accordance
with the United States Department of the Interior National Parks Service
Historic Preservation Fund for the Save America's Treasures Grant Program
re uirements, we have hired an historic architect, and we will use only
q
well- ualified historic restoration contractors in the work funded by this
q
grant.
The scheduled work includes the stripping of all paint from the existing
structure. Proper handling and disposal of the old paint is necessary as
it is a lead-based product. Many of the exterior components of this
structure (handrails, columns, stair treads,. clapboards, trim, brickwork
and masonry joints, etc.) are in need of repair and replacement due to
extensive deterioration over time. Additionally, a shed roof over the
below-grade basement entry is planned to be re-created on the back of the
building to reduce or eliminate water damage which is occurring to the
foundation and basement of the structure. Finally, re-grading of the
surrounding landscape will be necessary to more effectively move water
away from the structure.
The preliminary plans for the work, including the type of workmanship, the
re uired materials and the construction estimates, were created by the
q
county's historic architect, Davis Buckley Architects and Planners, as
art of an historic properties review and analysis performed in the fall
P
of 2008. This study was the basis for the grant application information
submitted to the Federal Government.
Og00'71
9F
;~
~~ ~ ,~~
~~ , ~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 20~ 7 Item Number: 8.C.6.
Subject:
Transfer $2,766 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the School
Board to Fund the Foster Grandparents Program at Ettrick Elementary School
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Transfer $2,766 from the Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the School
Board to fund the Foster Grandparents Program at Ettrick Elementary School.
Summary of Information:
Supervisor Durfee has requested that the Board transfer $2,766 from the
Matoaca District Improvement Fund to the School Board to fund the Foster
Grandparents Program at Ettrick Elementary School. Under this School Board
program, senior citizens will work with 25 kindergarten and first grade
students who are experiencing reading difficulty. This early intervention has
been proven to prevent future reading problems for such students later in
their education. This request was originally made by the Foster Grandparents
Program. The Board is not authorized to give public funds to organizations
like the Foster Grandparent Program. The County can legally transfer public
funds to the School Board to pay operating expenses of an education program
which is sanctioned by the School Board, offered as part of the public school
curriculum and operated in a public school facility.
For information regarding available balances in the District Improvement
Fund accounts, please reference the District Improvement Fund Report.
Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Mana eq ment
0425:85385.1
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # OtD00'72
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
APPLICATION
This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a
request for funding with District Improvement Funds. Completing and signing this
form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally
consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority
of the County to give public funds, such as District Improvement Funds, to private
persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of
Supervisors from even considering your request.
1. What is the name of the applicant (person?
or organization) making this funding request? Foster Grandparent Program
2. If an organization is the applicant, what is?
the nature and purpose of the organization?
(Also attach organization's most recent
articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to
application.) The mission of the program is
to provide opportunities for low-income seniors to volunteer in schools, child
care centers, iuvenile detention centers, homeless shelters, institutions for the
mentally retarded and group foster homes.
3. What is the amount of funding you are
seeking? $2-
4. Describe in detail the funding request and
how the money, if approved, will be spent. The requested funds will be used
to supplement the cost of stipends for 2 foster grandparents for a nine month
period. They will serve as mentors or tutors for children with special problems.
5. Is any County Department involved in the
project, event or program for which you
are seeking funds? ,_ No
6. If this request for funding will not fully fund
your activity or program, what other
individuals or organizations will provide
the remainder of the funding?
Additional funds will be
requested from other local sources, such as United Way Services or federal
fu.-:
00~+~'73
7. If applicant is an organization, answer the
following:
Is the organization a corporation?
Is the organization non-profit?
Is the organization tax-exempt?
Yes No_X_
Yes X_ No
Yes_X No
8. What is the address of the applicant
making this funding request?
9. What is the telephone number, fax
number, a-mail address of the applicant?
23 Seyler Drive
Petersburg, VA 23805
(804) 861-3185
Fax (804) 732-9459
FGPINC~a,A0L.C4M
Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an
organization you must be the president, vice-president,
chairman/director orvice-chairman of the organization.
Signature
Title (if sig~ng on behalf of an organization)
Printed Name
9 -~u~v
Here
0508:23380.1
o4DO~74
„1 ~~'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 9.A.
Sub'ect:
Report on Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital
Projects, District Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Acceptance of attached report.
Summary of Information:
Preparers James J. L. Stegmaier Title: County Administrator
Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No #
~~~~'~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
Budgeted Ending Balances
January 26, 2011
of General Fund
Budgeted Expenditures*
FY2008 $50,945,000 7.5%
FY2009 $53,495,000 7.7%
FY2010 $53,495,000 8.1
FY2011 $53,495,000 8.3%
*The County's financial policy states the targeted fund balance level is 7.5%.
0~0~7g
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
January 26, 2011
Board Meeting Date Description Amount Balance
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2009
4/15/2009 FY2010 Budgeted Addition $14,021,400 $19,632,088
4/15/2009 FY2010 Capital Projects (14,021,400) 5,610,688
4/14/2010 Substitute funding for CircuitlGeneral District Courthouse (832,500) 4,778,188
expansion.
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2010
FOR FISCAL YEAR 20 11 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2010
4/15/2010 FY2011 Budget Addition 13,169,200 17,947,388
4/15/2010 FY2011 Capital Projects (12,962,600) 4,984,788
5/26/2010 FY2011 Part of Sports Quest funding (206,600) 4,778,188
8/25/2010 Replacement generator for the IST building (290,400) 4,487,788
8/25/2010 Replacement funding to complete projects at Clover Hill (340,000) 4,147,788
Sports Complex
11/17/2010 Renovations and Additions to the Manchester Volunteer (120,000) 4,027,788
Rescue Squad (MVRS) Project
(~~o~°z7
A
~~
z~
Owe
V ~ o
N
Q ~ `0
W O N
~ ~ ~
a ~
W ~ ~
~ ~ h
W ~
xa
V ~,
A
~ ^"
CC
.~ ~
C ~'
a a
~ "d
~ ~
~ 0
~ ~
C ~
0 b
~ ~
bA
~~
N
b ~
~ ~
~ ~
A
"~ ~
R ~
w~
C ,0
N ~
•~i
~ a
0
L
a
~~
~ a,
~~
O
~ ~
.0 ~
aU
.~
A
~ ~ ~ O 00
I~ O M ~ M
Nf~} M M M M
~
M
i ~
~ i i
~ ~
00 l
~
~ N
~
~
O ~
O ~
~0
' ' '
O ~ N
~0
~ FL
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
M M M M M
00 00 00 00 00 '
M M M M M
M M M M M
bR
a~
b
,~ .~
~ ~
x u '
b
~ ~,
~ ~
C
~ 0
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ c
~ U A ~ ~ U
QflO~?78
Prepared by
Accounting Department
December 31, 2010
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALI ZED LEASE PURCHASES
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
Outstanding
Date Original Date Balance
B_ elan Description Amount Ends 12/31/2010
04/99 Public Facility Lease -Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000 O 1/20 $7,185,000
(Refinanced 10/10)
01/01 Certificates of Participation -
Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation;
Acquisition/Installation of Systems 13,725,000 11/21 6, l 70,000
03/03 Certificates ofParticipation -Building
Construction, Expansion and Renovation 6,100,000 11/23 3,860,000
03/04 Certificates of Participation -Building
Construction, Expansion and Renovation;
AcquisitionlInstallation ofSystems 21,970,000 11/24 15,130,000
10/04 Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project 16,596,199 10/l l 16,596,199
12/04 Energy Improvements at County Facilities 1,519,567 12/17 1,023,579
O5/OS Certificates ofParticipation -Building
Acquisition, Construction, Installation,
Furnishing and Equipping;
Acquisition/Installation of Systems 14,495,000 11/24 9,350,000
05/06 Certificates of Participation -Building
Acquisition, Construction, Installation,
Furnishing and Equipping;
Acquisition/Installation of Systems 11,960,000 11/24 7,945,000
(1R/(17
., .,, .,. Certificates ~f Particinati~n - Building
...------------ -- - -------r----- ~.,
Expansion/Renovation, Equipment
Acquisition 22,220,000 11/27 18,710,000
TOTAL APPROVED 124 685 766 X85 9 7~ 8
AND EXECUTED
PENDING EXECUTION
Approved
Descr~tion Amount
None
000~'79
January 26, 2011
Speakers List
Afternoon Session
1. Mr. L.J. McCoy
2.
3.
4.
5.
Chester-fleld County Bunch NAACP
Coy, Jr.
,m
,aryl Biggins
resident
3onaparte
~'
Clazlc
rer Wednesday, January 26, 2011
P°rrard To the honorable Chairman of the Boarcf Mr. Art Warren, Vice Chair Ms. Dorothy Jaeckle,
board members, and County Administrator Mr. James J. L. Stegmaier, my name is L. J.
McCoy, Jr., president of the Chestefield NAACP.
On Wednesday January 12"', I came to this bank of justice to cash a check that Mr. Jesse
Mayes and Dr. Freddie Nicholas were not given the privilege to redeem. That check was
supposed to have guaranteed the equality and justice that this county had denied its citizen of
color. That symbolic check was a bridge, which indicated that there were no longer two laws of
justice here, but one. That check represented the earnest reparations of hard work by an
individual who had paid his dues.
But when a demand for payment was required, it was stamped INSUFFIENT FUNDS.
Now, 2011 seem like an end, but it's not, it's a beginning. And those that believed the
community of color would be pacified by this malpractice of justice will now be in shock. In shock
because the community of color will not sit back and allow this moment to dissolve into our
memories and act as though nothing has happened. And we have to define this moment, even if
we cannot change the course of events.
That vote wasn't about politics, nor was it about experience. It wasn't about an individual whose
board seniority had not eGipsed 20 years. That vote was more about dissecting the identity of
African Americans here in Chesterfield, and plating them in a basin in the far comer of the
morgue. This vote was nothing short of political castration.
Yet, this procedure has no place in the future of our county, and this page should be tom from
this county's administration play-book. I have promising hope for the people of color here in this
county. And, I have the faith that this is not the destiny of our future.
I there forth urge that this board find a way to rectify the actions created by the discourse of the
January 12"' appointments which has evolved in an immense distraction in this county's future.
Thank you.
Res ful ,
L J. , Jr. Branch Preside 't'"''
2417 Osborne Rd.
Chester, VA 23831
(804) 241-7866
P.O. Box 246
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
804 768-0662
._._._ _~__~__c-_~r_____ ___...
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: January 26, 201 ~ Item Number: 11.
Subject:
Closed Session
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Summary of Information:
Closed session 1) pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(1), Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, relating to the performance of a specific county employee; and 2)
pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(1) Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, relating
to the appointment of a specific county employee.
Preparers Jeffrey L. Mincks
Attachments: ~ Yes
^ No
Title: County Attorney
0423:83989.1
# 0~008~
~~s' c
;~~ ~~';,
~~ ~ ~ i
- ~
'>~' auq~r~p,r,..
1749
-:~RCtIi~'
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 15.A.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing the 2010 James River High School Varsity Boys
Volleyball Team for Its Outstanding Accomplishments and Excellent
Representation of Chesterfield County
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Mr. Gecker requests that the Board of Supervisors commend and recognize the
2010 James River High School Varsity Boys Volleyball Team for its superior
achievements and representation of Chesterfield County.
Summary of Information:
Under the guidance of Coach Terry Ford, the James River Boys Varsity
Volleyball Team finished their season with an overall record of 21-5. The
Rapids were Dominion District Tournament Champions, Central Region Champions
and were the Group AA.A State Boys Volleyball Champions.
Preparers Michael S. Golden
Title: Director, Parks and Recreation
Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No
# O~i~~J~1
RECOGNIZING THE 2010 JAMES RIVER HIGH SCHOOL VARSITY BOYS VOLLEYBALL TEAM
FOR ITS OUTSTANDING REPRESENTATION OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
WHEREAS, participation in high school sports has long been an integral
part of Chesterfield County's educational, physical and emotional development
for students; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Terry Ford, coach of the James River High School Varsity
Boys Volley Team completed his first year of coaching; and
WHEREAS, under Mr. Ford's direction, the 2010 James River Rapids
finished the season with a 21-5 record; and
WHEREAS, the James River Rapids were the Dominion District Tournament
Champions; and
WHEREAS, the James River Rapids were the Central Region Champions; and
WHEREAS, the James River Rapids were the State AAA Boys Volleyball
Champions; and
WHEREAS, the team members include Eric Sullivan, Kaeler Sullivan, Troy
Keohane, Pete Sowers, Michael Harrier, Harry Tisdale, Darren Kilby, Mitchell
Ford, English Snidow, Josh Carrington, Sam Albus, Colin Moore, Simon Wilson,
Jonathan Wert and managers Katie Crisco and Aubrey Duignam; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, this 26th day of January 2011, publicly recognizes the 2010 James
River High School Varsity Boys Volleyball Team for its outstanding
representation of Chesterfield County, commends the team on its commitment to
excellence and sportsmanship, and expresses best wishes for continued
success.
oo~n~~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 7
,~ AGENDA
~.
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 15.6.
Sub'ect:
Resolution Recognizing Boy Scouts Upon Attaining the Rank of Eagle Scout
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt resolutions recognizing
Mr. Jake Dalton Flippen, Troop 2880, sponsored by Beulah United Methodist
Church, Mr. Ly'David M. McQueen, Troop 411, sponsored by Swansboro Baptist
Church, and Mr. Robert Alexander Elmore, Troop 1891, sponsored by Bon Air
United Methodist Church, upon attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. They will
be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of their families, to
accept their resolutions.
Preparers Janice Blakley
Attachments: ^ Yes
Title: Clerk to the Board
^ No
# Qfl0O83
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William
D. Boyce on February 8, 1910, and was chartered by Congress in 1916;
and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to build character,
provide citizenship training and promote physical fitness; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide
variety of skills including leadership, service and outdoor life,
serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service
project beneficial to their community, being active in the troop,
demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law,
Mr. Jake Dalton Flippen, Troop 2880, sponsored by Beulah United
Methodist Church, Mr. Ly'David M. McQueen, Troop 411, sponsored by
Swansboro Baptist Church, and Mr. Robert Alexander Elmore, Troop 1891,
sponsored by Bon Air United Methodist Church, have accomplished those
high standards of commitment and have reached the long-sought goal of
Eagle Scout which is received by only four percent of those individuals
entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through their experiences in Scouting, learning
the lessons of responsible citizenship, and endeavoring to prepare
themselves for a role as leaders in society, Jake, Ly'David and Robert
have distinguished themselves as members of a new generation of
prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors, this 26th day of January 2011, hereby extends its
congratulations to Mr. Jake Dalton Flippen, Mr. Ly'David M. McQueen and
Mr. Robert Alexander Elmore and acknowledges the good fortune of the
county to have such outstanding young men as its citizens.
~~ ~ r
.• , ~ ;~
E~~ ~pG
~ ~~4s ~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 15.C.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing February 2011, as "Children's Dental Health Month"
in Chesterfield County
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Adoption of attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Ms. Jaeckle requested that the Board of Supervisors recognize February
2011, as "Children's Dental Health Month." Dr. Samuel W. Galston, Dr. C.
Sharone Ward, Dr. Frank Farrington, Dr. Melanie Wexel Spears and JoAnne
Wells, R.D.H. will be present to receive the resolution.
Preparers Janice Blakley
Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No
'boons
Title: Clerk to the Board
RECOGNIZING FEBRUARY 2011, AS "CHILDREN'S DENTAL HEALTH MONTH"
IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
WHEREAS, the ninth annual "Give Kids a Smile! Access to Dental
Care Day" will be conducted in a number of Chesterfield County dental
offices and schools on February 4, 2011; anal
WHEREAS, numerous children's dental health outreach activities and
education will take place in Chesterfield County Schools throughout
February 2011; and
WHEREAS, through the joint efforts of the Southside Dental
Society, the Virginia Dental Association, the Virginia Department of
Health, Division of Dentistry, the Medical College of Virginia School
of Dentistry, the Alliance of the Southside Dental Society, local
dentists and dental healthcare providers who volunteer their time, and
the school district of Chesterfield County, this program was
established to foster the improvement of children's dental health; and
WHEREAS, these dental volunteers have provided educational
materials and programs and stress the importance of regular dental
examinations, daily brushing and flossing, proper nutrition, sealants
and the use of mouth guards during athletic activities; and
WHEREAS, several local dental offices will volunteer their
services on "Give Kids a Smile! Access to Dental Care Day," to provide
treatment and education to local underprivileged children.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors, this 26th day of January 2011, publicly recognizes
February 4, 2011 as "Give Kids a Smile! Access to Dental Care Day" and
February 2011, as "National Children's Dental Health Month" in
Chesterfield County, expresses gratitude, on behalf of all Chesterfield
County residents, and commends those organizations responsible for
their proactive approach to dental health and also commends Dr. Samuel
W. Galstan, Dr. C. Sharone Ward, Dr. Frank Farrington, Dr. Melanie
Wexel Spears and JoAnne Wells, R.D.H., for helping to protect our
children's dental health.
oooo~s
January 26, 2011
Speaker's List
Evening Session #1
(Following Presentation of Resolutions)
1. Dr. Wilson Shannon
2. Ms. Sherise Green
3. Ms. Esthella Andrade
4. Mr. Bob Herndon
5. Mr. Jeron Jones
Evening Session #2
(End of the Evening Agenda)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
~:
E
O
G1 'G •y
~ ~ ~+
t ~ ~
(/~ ~ C
R ,V Q
E~.ae
Q ~ C
_~
_~
d
r
L
U
4
L
a
c
.~
V
~~
U
V
Q
G
_V
_~
_d,
~I
~+
V
as
C
o 0
o~ o
~ ~
~ N M `-
0 0 0
~ ~ ~ N
~ ~ O ~
O O O O
~ ~ 0
~ M r
r ~ r r
N
~ _N _N
s
is ~
~
.-
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
tLi
c
j
2
N ~
~ s
±-~
.Q c~ ca
~
~ ~
~ ~
c
L
~~"~ ~ d) n u -I--
_~
c
E ,.
V ~
E
~~~
"-' c Z
t ~ .N
N t H
~ V _~
~ ~
C
~~ ~ Q
Q 'O C1
m Y
ca
~ c
m
Q
U
a
t
V
L
~i
Q
C
s
~_
_~
~_
,~~.+
d
t
U
.~
.;a
C
N
~ ~
~ O
N ~
~
ti
M ti
Cfl ti ti
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ d' M
a~
~ ~ a~
~
~
._
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
t
~
~
~ ~
j
2
N ~
~ ~
±-~
~ N ca
~
L
~ _
~
~ .~
~
00;
00
r
M
M;
0
I--
i
Animal Shelter
Chesterfield v. Richmond Community
"Euthanasia" Analysis
Intake Chesterfield Richmond ACBC Richmond SPCA
Healthy 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Treatable - Rehabilitatable 21.8% 20.3% 0.0%
Treatable -Manageable 36.8% 47.9% 0.0%
Unhealthy -Untreatable 41.4% 31.8% 100.0%
O
N O
=' N
tq
~ C7 Y
N ~ N N
`-' C d C
N O
"T' O ~
c a
U ~
~ U ~
~ .~ w
~~
~~}
L O (0
U 3 ~
N ~
~U
~ O
LL
m o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0
O r cD O) h ch O r N 0 c0 O O
H N r N f~ m M~ r~ N 0 CL
O r r .-- r r r r r
0
~ y CO (O N 7 ~ ~ O a0 M ~
~ MN7Nf`7~fhNNMN
T ~
L_
f0 ~
N ~
L C
c ~
f0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OD OD 7 O N U7 M O) O) (D ('7 OC
H O cM ~ Oi ~ CO ~ OD N 00 r C'7
O r r r r r r r r r r
\°
0
I1]I M M~~~~ M N M N N N
\ \° \ \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \°
f0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ O mn hO~DNNtnOON
1h NNOi c7N to to l~ONCV c0
f w h ~ N ~ (O ~ iA O O tD ~ ~
O
1
.a
_y ~_ N ~t f~ O ~ I~ R O N ~.
~ N ~~~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ r0 r
«0
m
a
m
r
N
fd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CO O CO ~ p) 07 f~ c0 N O N
H ~!7 ~ N Q) M ~ ~ N f~ CO CO M
O r r r r r r r r r N N
0
~ to O m h O M O O h
L c)M CDC V'M Ch7~CO~
f0
N
t~ V' to r CO B O O O7 N M
N N M M M M N N N M N N
O
H
L
c
O
T ~
~ LL ~ Q ~ > > ~ N V O N
-~-~Qt~OZ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O~ tD O O f~ N N O) CO
CM OD 00 O to n d' 1~ CO ~ ~
<t ~ to c} N M d' ~t N ~ ~
N M~ N N~~ N N N N a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.-- M CO 00 V r I~ r N 0 f`7 O:
N N M t~ d0' ~ M N M~~ if.
~~rn~no rn~rnorn
~`') ~ ~ N N r N
C ~ \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \° \°
~ o 0 0 0 0 0~ o 0 0 0
N CO N h N N O M CO ~
O N ~ ~ 00 (O V' ~T 00 CO N h
~ •C (h N N M M ch
l~
L
~ N 7
Z W Nn~•~N~v~cONODr~
p~j H N N r
r a ~
m V
U
~ otl
Y!
N
~ O
O ~
o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N ~
H _O
~- O
N
,FO
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
Y
.~
C
~ ~~ N n M O In O n CO OD m n N
lrf C ~ ~ ~ (O CO O 1~ ~ h ~ ~ ~
~ M
1'7 M M
O
O
O
C N O
> r
N ~ f+') N
0
d
d
n
N
M
O
Of
N
\I
N
III
all
U w
ova `~° c.o ~ >~~?,rna~. > ~ y
O N O O m
F- m~H F- ~~~Q~-'»QinOZO FO-
i
p
Y_
2~ N
J
} Y
C ~, f0
O ~p ~
~ ~
U ~ ~
~ pa U
N
~ ~ O
,U N
U•
~ y C
~ ~0 N
~ O
,~ O
p O
3 N
m o
'> ~
m
a
C
H
C
0
,~ a
), L
t_ ~
(0 ~
L ~
C C
~ ~
O
H
w
O
0
N
W
m
a~
(0
O
0
0
p
t0
c~Yo
.fl
f0
L
a~
0
I-
0
0 0 0
O N ~C
N .- t-
~ M OOf
0 0 0
CO M tt~
C7 M M
O O ti
O O O
~ N
0 0 0
O O O
O O O
O O O
r
M N N
o ~ o
O O O
O O O
O O O
0 0 0 0 \ e
~? ~ O ~p O O O
~ N O O O
M ~
c
co
M O O O
O M W
O ~ ~
~
r' U
O
0 0 0 0
rn o 0 0 0 0
a
o 0 0 0 0
g
~! O M
CD CO M
OD M N
~'- N ~
N -~ 01
CO O ~O
~ O O C1
~ N M to
F--
N O O ~
~' N N ~
O O O
CO M Q~
M N 1f~
U!
N N ~+
O
F-
.~
N
j ~
> ~ ~G
} (Q
~ C
C
w. O O
L O 03
c~ ~ U
~°c ~ o
O w N
L fq ~
U ~. C
~0 03
~ O
O O
3 c`
a~ o
a~
i~
H
O
0
~ O
a L
« ~
(0 f0
O ~
L C
C ~
O
H
O
0
Q
~ H
~ O
(9
0
H
N
07
~o
L
03
L
0)
0
H
of
0
o
~`'~ N N
00 tp 1~
M ~ I~
~ ~ r
fh N ~O
0 o e
O O r
O ~ O
~ ~-
0 o e
r- rn ap
~ N r
~ ~ M
M (O O1
N 00 O
~ r O
0 0 0
O 1~ Q~
O In ~
~ ~ d'
~ CO 1~ Cp In ~
ch ~ OMO ~ N M
T
O O O O ~ O
~ O ~D ~p O ~ M
O O O~ ~ O M N
N ~ r
C
m
L
N
M M ti W O
00 00 ~O ~ r ~ ~
~ U
O
0 o e o o e
M ~ ~- 0 0 0
~ ~ 0 0 0
M 00 r
0
L ~ 0
0 M
~p N N N
O
~ M 00
~ O r
(0 ~ ~ ~[!
p ~ ~' ~
I--
(D I
0)
}
O ao N
O O ''''
N N ~
O O O
CO Ln r
~ ~' <O
~f ~ 00
r- ~-- N
O aD N
O O r
N N ~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
O BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: January 26, 2011 Item Number: 21.
Sub'ect:
Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of
Supervisors
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Reques
Summary of Information:
Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be
held on February 23, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room.
Preparers Janice Blaklev
Attachments: ^ Yes
Title: Clerk to the Board
^ N~ (~~+D~D~'7