The URL can be used to link to this page

2011-03-23 PacketCHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ,~, Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 2.A. Subiect: County Administrator's Report County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Summary of Information: The County Administrator will update the Board on the progress of various projects as requested by the Board of Supervisors. Preparers Louis G. Lassiter Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Assistant County Administrator NO ?~~~J1 County Administrator's Top 40's List I. Critical Proiects/Activities 1. Airport Entrance Improvements 2. Amelia Reservoir Project 3. Business Climate Survey 4. Census 2010/Redistricting 2011 5. Community Risk Analysis/Emergency Service Coverage 6. Countywide Comprehensive Plan/Public Facilities Plan 7. Eastern Midlothian Re-development - Chippenham Square - Spring Rock - Stonebridge (formerly Cloverleaf Mall) - Streetscaping 8. Electronic Message Centers 9. GRTC Service 10. Health Care Contract -Rebid 11. Irrigation Policies/Demand Management for Water Use 12. Mass Grading Ordinance 13. Postal Zip Codes - to Board of Supervisors 3/2011 14. Recycling Committee Recommendations 15. Private Sewer Treatment Facility 16. Sports Quest 17. Ukrops Kicker Complex/Poseidon Swimming -Stratton Property -announcement 3/2011 18. Utilities Policies and Managed Growth II. On~oin~ Proiects/Activities 1. 2011 Legislative Program -adopted 11/19/10 2. Airport Master Plan 3. Animal Welfare Issues 4. Capital Improvement Program 5. Capital Regional Collaborative Focus Group 6. Cash Proffers 7. Citizen Budget Advisory Committee 8. Efficiency Studies -Countywide 9. Federal Stimulus Package - Energy Block Grant - Economic Development - Police Department - Recovery Zone Bonds 10. Financial/Budget Issues 11. Fort Lee Expansion 12. Hydrilla Issue 13. Joint Meetings of Board of Supervisors/School Board 14. Magnolia Green CDA 1 ~~~~~~ Updated 3/16/2011 County Administrator's Top 40's List III. 15. Meadowville Interchange -Groundbreaking 11 /2010 16. North American Project (at Rt. 288 and Rt. 10) 17. RMA Work Group 18. RRPDC -Large Jurisdiction Committee 19. RRPDC -Transportation Strategies Work Group (work on hold) 20. Sports Tourism Plan Implementation 21. UASI (Regional) Completed Proiects/Activities 1. Board's Appointments Process - 8/2008 2. Bow Hunting Restrictions - 2/24/2010 3. Business Climate Survey - 7/2008 4. Business Fee Holiday (Extension) - 9/2010 5. CBLAB Discussions -12/2009 6. Citizen GIS - 5/2010 7. Citizen Satisfaction Survey -12/2008 8. Citizen Satisfaction Survey - 12/2010 9. COPS Grants 10. Efficiency Studies -Fire Department and Fleet Management - 6/2008 11. Efficiency Study -Quality/Chesterfield University Consolidation - 7/2009 12. Electronic Signs -1/2010 13. Board's Emergency Notification Process 14. Employee Health Benefits -Contract Renewal - 8/2009 15. Financial/Budget Issues - Adoption of 2011 Budget - 4/2010 - Adoption of County CIP - 4/2010 - Adoption of School CIP - 4/2010 - Bond Issue/Refinancing - AAA Ratings Retained 16. 457 Deferred Comp Plan (Approved) 17. Hosting of Hopewell Website 18. Impact Fees for Roads - 9/2008 19. In Focus Implementation - Phase I - 8/2008 20. In-Focus Implementation -Phase II (Payroll/HR) -12/2009 21. Insurance Service Upgrade (ISO) for Fire Department - 9/2009 22. Jefferson Davis Streetscape Project - S/2010 23. Leadership Exchange Visits with City of Richmond 24. 2010 Legislative Program - 3/2010 25. Low Impact Development Standards 26. Meadowdale Library -11/2008 27. Midlothian Turnpike/Courthouse Road Streetscape Improvements (Towne Center) 28. Minor League Baseball (new team) - 2/2010 ~~~~~~~ 2 Updated 3/16/2011 County Administrator's Top 40's List 29. Multi-Cultural Commission (Quarterly Reports due to Board) -11/2008 30. Planning Fee Structure (General Increases) - 6/2009 31. Planning Fee Structure (Reductions for In-Home Businesses) -1/2009 32. Planning Fees (Holiday for Commercial Projects) - 8/2009 33. Police Chase Policy (Regional) - 5/2010 34. Potential Legislation -Impact Fees/Cash Proffers -1/2009 35. Property Maintenance -Proactive Zoning Code Enforcement (countywide) - 2/2009 36. Property Maintenance -Rental Inspection Program 37. Public Safety Pay Plans Implemented (Phase I) - 9/2008 38. Redistricting 2011 Calendar/Process Report 39. Regional Workforce Investment Initiative 40. Results of Operations -11/19/2010 41. Sign Ordinance 42. Southwest Corridor Water Line - Phase I - 7/2008 43. Sports Tourism Plan -1/2010 44. Sports Tourism Program with Metropolitan Richmond Sports Backers - 8/2009 45. Streelight Policy -12/1/10 46. Ukrops Kicker Complex -soccer fields -Opened 8/2009 47. Upper Swift Creek Plan (Adopted) - 6/2008 48. Upper Swift Creek Water Quality Ordinances 49. VDOT Subdivision Street Acceptance Requirements - 7/2009 50. VRS Benefits for New Employees - 7/2010 51. Walk Through Building Permit Process -10/2009 52. Water Issues/Restrictions 53. Website Redesign - 6/2009 54. Wind Energy Systems - 3/10/2010 55. Wireless Internet Access in County Facilities - 9/2008 56. Watkins Centre 57. Woolridge Road Reservoir Crossing Project - S/2010 ~~~~A~~ 3 Updated 3/16/2011 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 5.A. Subject: Resolution Recognizing April 7, 2011, as "Regional Kindergarten Registration Day" County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Mr. Warren has requested that the Board adopt the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Smart Beginnings Greater Richmond has requested that local elected officials from each of the Richmond region's localities adopt a resolution in support of the regional kindergarten registration day, April 7, 2011. A common registration day has enabled the region's school systems and Smart Beginnings Greater Richmond to conduct a comprehensive campaign to promote the importance of on-time kindergarten registration. Registering on time can prevent attendance delays by ensuring that children have the required health screenings and immunizations necessary to attend school. On-time registration also ensures that parents receive important information about events and activities that will help their child feel comfortable when school starts. Jacqueline Hale, Director of Community Mobilization, Smart Beginnings Greater Richmond, and members of the Smart Beginnings Leadership Council will be present to receive the resolution. Preparers Jana D. Carter Title: Director, Juvenile Services Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No ~~1~5 SUPPORTING THE REGIONAL KINDERGARTEN REGISTRATION CAMPAIGN WHEREAS, learning begins at birth; and WHEREAS, the early years are the most critical years in preparing children to start kindergarten ready to succeed; and WHEREAS, investing in children's early development and school readiness reaps returns across different sectors - workforce, health care, education, public safety and business - resulting in a human capital investment strategy proven to improve ,lives and encourage economic growth for the entire Richmond region; and WHEREAS, Virginia's retired generals, admirals and civilian military leaders agree that a strong commitment today to high-quality early education will keep America strong and safe tomorrow; and WHEREAS, lack of school readiness contributes to tremendous costs in school remediation, juvenile delinquency, teen pregnancy, substance abuse, crime, and lost productivity; and WHEREAS, the Regional Plan for Children's School Readiness (the Plan) provides a map to achieving the vision that all children in the Richmond region will be healthy, well cared for and ready to succeed in school and in life; and WHEREAS, Smart Beginnings Greater Richmond (the Coalition), an initiative of the United Way of Greater Richmond and Petersburg and the Greater Richmond Chamber, is a coalition of public and private agencies covering 11 local jurisdictions (the counties of Charles City, Chesterfield, Goochland, Hanover, Henrico, New Kent, Powhatan, and the cities of Colonial Heights, Petersburg and Richmond and the town of Ashland) and citizens working together as the mobilizing force behind the Plan; and WHEREAS, the goals, objectives, strategies and indicators of the Plan were developed and approved through a collaborative community process led by the Coalition; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County government and Chesterfield County Public Schools are represented on the Coalition that includes Ready Action Teams; and WHEREAS, members of the Coalition's Ready Schools Action Team reached a consensus to hold kindergarten registration on April 7, 2011, and will campaign to raise awareness of kindergarten readiness and this regional registration date; and WHEREAS, registering for kindergarten on time can prevent attendance delays by ensuring that children have the required health screenings and immunizations necessary to attend school. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors supports the Regional Kindergarten Registration campaign and encourages parents to register their children for kindergarten on April 7tn ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~_ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 5.B. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Japanese Exchange Students Visiting from Saitama City, Japan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Mr. Warren requests that the Board of Supervisors approve this resolution recognizing the Japanese exchange students visiting from Saitama City, Japan. Summary of Information: The high school students from the Saitama Municipal Urawa High School in Japan are spending a week at Clover Hill High School as part of an exchange program that began in 1999. Saitama Municipal Urawa High School and Clover Hill High School are "sister schools" that have exchanged students on numerous occasions. This resolution recognizes that special friendship. Preparers Don Kappel Title: Director, Public Affairs Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No RECOGNIZING HIGH SCHOOL EXCHANGE STUDENTS FROM SAITAMA MUNICIPAL URAWA HIGH SCHOOL, SAITAMA CITY, JAPAN WHEREAS, international high school student exchange programs are recognized as excellent programs for introducing students from one country to the richness of other cultures through the experience of living with host families and attending high school in the host country; and WHEREAS, these programs lead to greater mutual understanding, respect and long-lasting friendships; and WHEREAS, Clover Hill High School in Chesterfield County, Virginia, and Saitama Municipal Urawa High School in Saitama City, Japan, have been "sister schools" since 1999 and have exchanged students on numerous occasions; and WHEREAS, these student exchanges are eagerly anticipated by participating students in the United States and Japan; and WHEREAS, the recent, unprecedented tragedy that struck Japan with a Tsunami and earthquakes, causing terrible loss of life and catastrophic damage, might have caused this year's planned visit by Saitama Municipal Urawa High School students to be canceled; and WHEREAS, plans for the exchange were discussed with all of the parents of the Saitama Municipal Urawa High School students, and all families agreed that the visit should be conducted despite the disasters in Japan; and WHEREAS, some of the Japanese students visiting Chesterfield County have family members and friends who have lost their homes or otherwise been affected by the disasters; and WHEREAS, Clover Hill High School students and their families, and all citizens of Chesterfield County, Virginia, extend deepest respect and sympathy to the many Japanese families affected by the catastrophes in their homeland, and are pleased to welcome the Saitama Municipal Urawa High School students and their chaperones to Virginia; and WHEREAS, Wada Hitomi, Takahashi Kanako, Terayama Yuka, Nakakura Akane, Nuguchi Mari, Fujino Ryota, Kobayashi Mayu, Kambayashi Sumire, Yajima Natsumi and Ishikawa Hikaru are the students attending Clover Hill High School this year as part of the exchange program, and Tamura Hiroyuki and Kawabata Junko are their adult chaperones. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, this 23rd day of March 2011, publicly recognizes the students from Saitama Municipal Urawa High School, welcomes them on behalf of all Chesterfield County residents, and extends sincere wishes for a rewarding and educational experience during their visit. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to the exchange students and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: s.A. Subject: Work Session on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2012 Budget County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a work session on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2012 Budget. Summary of Information: This time has been set to continue work sessions on the County Administrator's Proposed FY2012 Budget. This work session will include presentations on the Management Services Division budgets, and on the Constitutional Officers' budgets. A final work session is scheduled for April 13th. At the April 13th work session, changes to the proposed budget will be reviewed prior to adoption. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No O ,sue 0 .~ V W V t~ ....~ O V ~.I i~~l 0 C7 ~A .~ ~° a~ A., O Q bJD 'G GQ N O N w 4~ c~ V w . O .,.., U a~ V .~ A A A A A A A c~ 0 N M N U i-I ^~^ i^+l i~l C/) . ~..~ U ..-, w U .~ 0 r'~ ~ • ~ v~ U ~ •~ O ~ V ...~ .,.., V O V 4~ U .,.., ~~ O .,.., c~ V . ~.., 4~ ..., O .,.., .,.., 0 i .,.., w .,.., 4~ N . ~.., . ~.., V c~ a~ .,.., . ~..~ ~ 4~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ ~ ~ °' V ~ V ~ o ~ ~ `~ .~ U V ~ A V .~ •~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ . ~, V ~ a~ ~ ~ V O V C!1 U a~ a~ c U .~ ,-~ c~ .,.., V c~ .~ .~ iii v a~ bA c~ c~ r0 V . ~..~ .--1 . ~..~ M~ wl C~ C~ ~T~r h+~l . p.~ ~-~- C~ . ~..~ . ~..~ m V .~ • rj V a .,~ 4~ ~ ~ .o ~ ~ ~ V ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .o o ~ V 0 V 0 ~ ~ c~ ..~ 4~ 4~ V V ~ 4~ '~ ~ ~ ~A ~ ~ ~ ~~~,~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ o~ ~ ~ •~ ~ U ~ ~ .O a,Aw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~o ~ a~ ~ W 0 N M N U t~ y~ ~V~J ~^ r'1 0 l~ l~ 0 N w O N M N U s~ . O V 4~ c~ .-~ t~ .~ CC3 ~4 '.~ O ~A c~ '~--i .~ w .,.~ '~ c~ .~ i-1 O O ~% ~1 ~ ~ O U N 4~ O . •--• O O N ~. w 4~ O O N O '~ 4~ O 4~ .~ c~ s.~ ~"~ 4~ .--r . ~..~ O 004 ~--a 4~ .--~ .,.., 4~ .,.., O ..-, O U O V o~ G~ O O N bA U .,.., O . ~..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ V 0 4~ °o '~'' N ~ ~ C~ 4~ .,i ~1 V .,.i w ~ ....~ •~ V ~ ~ •~ r..~ • rl O V V ~~ 4~ .~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ''~ ~~ o ~ ~ w O ~ . ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ O O O ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 a~ a~ o ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ' 0 ~ ~ N e -+ ~~ G~ G~ .~ ~+ O N O ..-~ .~ 0 .,.., N .,.., O V A O '~ 4~ V .~ O ~'+ .,.., .~ M C7 .~ . ~.{ V A 0 N M N U i.a C/) ~ O 0 O .~ ~ 0 O Q ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ N 4~ w v 04 O O .,.., .,.., O '~--~ N ~ ~ ~, ~ ''~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~O ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ c!~ O ~ ~"~ U +"~ ~ ~ c W V ~ O A A bA O .~ w O U O 0 N N U ~~~ s E ~I~I 0 A 0 .~ a~ ~ V ~ ~ ~, U ~ ~ a~ . ~' a~ w ~ .~ ~ c~ o C~ V '~ 'T~ 4~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ V A A O .,.~ 0 ~J~J ^^i~i F~"1 ~I~1 .~ a~ ~G H ~° 0 .,.., V a~ 0 V a~ V O A 0 N M N c~ ~~~ i~l ~ 0 rl • rl C/) 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ^~^ ~ i~l -~ 4~ V A '~' a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ '~ ,~ o a~ N ~ ~ •,'.+ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~.., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ 4~ ~ ~ .1V .~ ~ ~ ,-~ ~ ~ ~ ~A ~ ~ O 4~ O 4~ ~ V ~ A A A W .-~ C~ 4~ ~1 . ~..r C~ i-I i~l i~l F~1 }~ .~ i~~-•.•.~II i~l V a~ C~ h~l N O •~ N y U 4~ ~O '(-~ r-+ e-~ N O N O N 0 0 N O N -~ M ' N ; .~ U ~~ O O O O O O O O N O 00 V r-+ ~ ^~ ~ i~l ~0 C~ ~.~II i~~l 0 0 4~ ice! . ~..~ H V ,~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ W ~ O ~ ~ U O 'U ~ ~ ~ (~ O ~ {~' . ~ O 0 0 0 t0 O 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~' ~ ~' M M N N ~ ~ 6F} ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 LL V ._ L[1 r Q 0 N M N U ~- ~~ e . ~..~ w W N .. /~ 4~ U .,.., ice. n ~~., V ,~ X10 c~ O ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1A cam, ~ ~ O .~ ~ ^ ~~ X10 , ~ ~+ ~ H W A A A 1111 0 N M N O ~ c~ '~ z z ~ ~ °' ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ "" .~ ~ ~ .~ U ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ v ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ p ~ A V z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ I ~ U ~~., r: k 'w" ~., ~. . , . w A. i~ C~ U O 'G O x ~ ~ u 3 Q ~ a Y Z ~ ~o ~ 0 3 ., `o ~ o a`, ~ `~ O O o0 u C ~ c0 t0 •L O O. a0+ «, ~ ~ ~ 'm r :t ~ c c 3 y ~p ~ u Z ~ Q a` > ~ ~i V 2 2 Z U ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ a ^ ^ ^ ^ 0 -o``9I' 0 0~9 l 0 o~`r 0 o~ 0 o~ 0 09~~ 0 0 ~~. o ~~~ 0 °~s~, 0 °s~,~ 0 0~9~ 0 0 Off. S O O O O O O O 0 l0 l.f) ~ M N ~ Q 'b 'U O., 0 b O O N 3 LL. c~ L a~ a~ L7 v L a Q H ~' 0 N M N .~ U V ~ O °~ = ~ V ''"' ~ ~ .,.., w ~ ~ O V ~ L a~ o ~ v ~ ~ .~ p G o A v ~ .,.., a~ d ~ ~ V ~ ~_ ~ ~O ~ L a 0 ~a a 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O EA EA ~,f} Eft i~ v U ~~ N C~ N U s~ ~1 ~ O O O N .~ 0 V ri C~ .O .~ ~ ~ 4~ •" •,~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o c ~ ~ ~ .~ p4 •~ '~ o •~ c, ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ s 4~ V • ~"~ RS ~ ~ ~ W ~ A a~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ y .U ~ ~ ~ . • ~ ~i '~ C~ ~ C~ .;~ o ,~ o ~ ~ • rl (~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O M bF} 0 .,.., t~ '~ ~ O ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ '~'~ ~ ci A a 0 N M N U ~. ~-~~_ V O 4~ x . ~..~ V .~ z U U O ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ o ~ ~ U ~ •~ ~' ~' 4~ ~"+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O P! ~ ~ V x ~ ~ ~ o A.' V '-' ~ V ~ w •~ •}, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • V ~.~+ OU ''~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ .,.., ~ . ~ V .. V ~+ ~ ~~ (r.1 c~ H ~ ~' A .,.., Q o ,~ ~ ~ •~ o ~ •~ cn ~ U ''~ ~' + + m ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..~ ~ ~-+ ~ a~ ~ U ~ , O ~ ~ w ~ w ~ A A 0 N M N U c~ .~ 0 V 4~ .~ z .O V . ~..~ V O °~ r-+ 0 A ^^ ~ r~~ h C~ ~ c~ .O c~ a~ 0 .~ .,.., A A ~~ V ~A ~ ~ ~ °' ~ ~ ^~ 4~ '~ ~ ~ .,.., ~ ~ ,~,, U 0 ~ ~.O ~ c~ ~ ...~ ~ ~ sV-i U A ~ ~ C~ ~ •~ ~ ~ G O ~ ~V ~~ ~ V •~ V O ~ s~-i U .,.~ V 0 A c~ .~ .~ V V ~C ~A O c% .~ W A A V 0 V ,-~ .~ V ~~ ~, '~ a~ ~ W~ A .~ C~ .~ C~ 0 .,~ ~a ~ ~~ ~ O ~ ~ 4~ ~V ~ 00 '.~ ~ I c~ ~ ~ ~ A ~~TT~ h~l ~--I C~ i-I V ~ p • O 00 [--+ ..-~ O N C~ ~--~ v~ ~ O w ~., ° 0 o 0 0 ~ ~ n ~ d'+ N N ~"'~ r: O O ~ ~ ~ ~ bA '~ ~ + .~ bA ~+ '~ ~ ''L~ ~ v H ~ O O ~"~ O w ~ ~ ~ ~ N k-+ N .-i }~ ~ ~ w C7 V E~ 0 N M N U • p.~ 4~ w '~ 4~ 4~ b v a ~ b v Q '- ..., 0 A~ W 0 N 0 r, (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ bA c~ ,s' V 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ O ~' o U ~ ~ ~ .,.., ~ ~ ~--~ ~ ''~ ~' c~ ~ • 4~ . ~..~ O V c~ '~ v~ c~ ~' ~, O ~ ~ ~ •~ O ~ A~ •~ ~ w ~y ~ O "'~ ~ '~ 4~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q '"~ .~ G~ ~ ~' A V H A A A 0 ~~ 5 1 ,~, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.1. Subject: Street Name Change County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board of Supervisors is requested to rename a portion of Meadowville Road from Rivers Bend Boulevard east, approximately 4,900 feet, to Meadowville Technology Parkway. Summary of Information: A request has been made by the Economic Development Authority of Chesterfield County to rename Meadowville Road, from Rivers Bend Boulevard east, approximately 4,900 feet, to Meadowville Technology Parkway. The name will be continued through a traffic circle, down into the Technology Park. Tying into the same traffic circle will be the remaining portion of Meadowville Road that will not be affected by the street name change. No businesses or citizens will be affected by the name change. Economic Development, Crater Planning District Commission, Environmental Engineering and GIS support the street name change. Staff Recommendations: Recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve renaming a portion of Meadowville Road from Rivers Bend Boulevard east, approximately 4,900 feet, to Meadowville Technology Parkway. District: Bermuda Preparers Richard M. McElfish Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Environmental Engineering ^ No # UO~+~~ ' N W~E S ~ ~ QO ~e~ ` " : ~ w +~~ ~~, v ~! ~~~ ~ °w,~r~~4 S~ ~ ~ ~ r . + ~ Traffic Circle i•~~r~ # ~~Ot '~ Ar r~ i• ~~~~ rte.=• s y• '~wR~,*+!• Gy ~ ~ ~ ~O ~ ~ ~ ~G ~ ~~~~G~ J~~~~~ .~ .. ~ ii O~J~ ~~PQO ~~ ~t,1 ~M RIVERS BtN-~ ~p ~, BLVD ~ `~s ,v ~ OQ~ ~ ~`9s _~ ~~ ••~ 7 .~. .i ~r i ~ ~ ~~ ~` ~ ~ .~• Meadowville Technology Pkwy i ;~, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.2.a, Subiect: Set Public Hearing to Consider Amending County Code Sections 8-2 and 8-4 Relating to Land Disturbance Permits County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Ord Action Rec Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors schedule a public hearing to consider amending Sections 8-2 and 8-4 of the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance relating to land disturbance permits. Summary of Information: The State Bureaucracy was recently reorganized. As a result, storm water management regulation was transferred from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to the Department of Conservation and Recreation. DCR has recently completed its periodic Program Administration Review of the County's Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. As a result of that review, staff is recommending the following two amendments to the County's ordinance. Neither of these changes will have a substantive effect on the administration of the County's erosion and sedimentation control program. Section 8-2 (b) This section, which exempts silvicultural activities (farming) from most erosion control regulation, inadvertently contains_ the word "not" in the exemption for silvicultural activities conducted ri accordance with best measure practices. The word "not" should be removed in order for the exemption to apply as intended. Preparers Richard M. McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineerin Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No OOOQ41 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Section 8-4 (7) (b) This section needs to be updated to reflect a reorganization of state bureaucracy, by referring to the Department of Conservation and Recreation. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors set April 13, 2011 as a public hearing date to amend these Sections of the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. District: Countywide ~ ®Q'~'~ ~ AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 8-2 AND 8-4 RELATING TO LAND-DISTURBANCE PERMITS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 8-2 and 8-4 of the Code of the Count~o Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 8-2. Approval of land-disturbing activity. (a) Except as provided in this chapter, no person shall engage in land- disturbing activity unless the person has obtained a land disturbance permit from the county and is displaying the permit on the site where the land-disturbing activity is taking place. No person shall install a septic tank or drain field in a resource management area as defined in the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance, unless the person has obtained a land disturbance permit and is displaying a permit on the site where the septic tank or drain field is being installed. (b) Persons who own, occupy or operate private lands on which agriculture, horticulture or silviculture is practiced shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter for all activity that takes place on that land that is exempt from the definition of land-disturbing activity set forth in Va. Code, § 10.1-560. This exemption shall n~ apply to silvicultural activities if there is full and continued compliance with silvicultural best management practices, developed and enforced by the state forester pursuant to Va. Code § 10.1-1105, during and after the land-disturbing activity. This exemption shall not apply to land-disturbing activities including the clearing of trees for the purpose of establishing a residential lawn on land in an agriculturally zoned district where the use is residential. This exemption shall also not apply to land which has been rezoned or converted, or which is proposed to be rezoned or converted, at the request of the owner or previous owner from an agricultural to a residential, commercial or industrial zoning district or use. 000 Sec. 8-4. Land-disturbance permits. (a) The environmental engineer shall not issue gland-disturbance permit to an applicant who has submitted gland-disturbance permit application unless: 000 (7) Copies of the following have been provided: Q~Q~~ ~ 0505:85636.1 1 a. Any wetlands permits that are required by federal or state law have been issued by the applicable state and federal regulatory agencies, or documentation has been submitted to the environmental engineer from a qualified wetlands expert, approved by the environmental engineer that establishes that a wetlands permit is not required by federal or state law; and b. d~Vel6ped--b~-~13e-dPprei~~vT-23i'b'i~6Hi~E'ii+ccr~q}~ ~ ~+anTTTn'r ee~rst~~c~ie~-motes e~e~e---~e~e--er~e~Teq~e~ For construction sites of 2500 square feet or more a Virginia Stormwater Management Permit application and fee form showing the application has been filed with State Department of Conservation and Recreation. 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0505:85636.1 2 ~ ~ ~ ~~'~ "-~ 7 ~~. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.2.b. Subject: Set a Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Providing for a Real Estate Tax Exemption for Disabled Veterans County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to set a public hearing for April 27, 2011 to consider an ordinance providing for a real estate tax exemption for disabled veterans. Summary of Information: An amendment to the state constitution which creates a real estate tax exemption for disabled veterans was proposed and agreed to by the General Assembly in 2009 and 2010, and ultimately was passed by a vote of the people on November 2, 2010. The constitutional amendment directs the General Assembly to provide the exemption by general law, which the General Assembly did during the 2011 session by passing Senate Bill 987. Senate Bill 987 requires localities to adopt a local ordinance implementing the tax exemption. Senate Bill 987 has not yet been signed by the Governor, but is anticipated to be signed by him on April 6. The bill exempts from local real estate taxation 100 0 of the value of the dwelling, and up to one acre of land upon which the dwelling is situated, owned by a veteran who has been rated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Preparers Jeffrey L. Mincks Attachments: ~ Yes Title: County Attorney 0623:85757.1(85751.1) ^ No # Ot~04Q5 ~ ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Affairs to have a 1000 service-connected, permanent, and total disability, and who occupies the property as his or her principal residence. The bill also allows the surviving spouse of a veteran eligible for the exemption to qualify for the exemption provided that the death of the veteran occurs after January 1, 2011. The application for the exemption must be submitted to the commissioner of revenue along with the requisite proof of disability from the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs. It was anticipated that the legislation would specifically provide that January 1, 2011 would be the effective date of the law for localities like Chesterfield with a tax year based on the calendar year. This was certainly discussed throughout the legislative process. However, the bill as finally enacted by the General Assembly does not clearly mandate a January 1, 2011 effective date. It is anticipated that the Governor will propose an amendment to the bill to clarify the effective date, and that the General Assembly will adopt that amendment prior to the Governor's signature on April 6, 2011. Until the Governor and the General Assembly provide the final details on the bill, it is premature to draft the precise language of an ordinance for the Board to adopt. It is very unlikely, however, that the final language of the bill will change the material terms of the law as described above. In order to adopt the mandated ordinance in a timely manner, Staff recommends that a public hearing be set for April 27 to consider adoption of the ordinance. The actual ordinance will be prepared after the Governor and General Assembly act and will be available to the Board and the public in time for the ordinance to be advertised for an April 27 public hearing. Staff is currently working with peers at the state and in other localities to determine the potential fiscal impact of the bill and will present information in preparation for the public hearing. ~~Q~~~ 0623:85757.1(85751.1) ~; _ q~ .~.9: ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.3. Sum Revised Resolution Recognizing Firefighter Kenneth E. Aliceburg, Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Upon His Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Adoption of attached revised resolution. Summary of Information: Mr. Aliceburg's resolution was adopted on the consent agenda at the Board's February 23, 2011, meeting. Revision is necessary to correct information previously provided. Preparers Edward L. Senter Jr. Title: Fire Chief Attachments: Yes ~ No # ^ O+DO ~-4'7 RECOGNIZING FIREFIGHTER KENNETH E. ALICEBURG FOR HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Firefighter Kenneth E. Aliceburg retired from the Chesterfield Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department, Chesterfield County, on July 1, 2010; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg attended Recruit School #15 in 1984 and has faithfully served the county for more than twenty-five years in various assignments, as a firefighter at the Ettrick, Chester, Manchester, Clover Hill, Dutch Gap and Winterpock Fire and EMS Stations; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was recognized as the Career Firefighter of the Year for 1993; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was recognized with an Emergency Medical Services Award for his lifesaving actions in May 1993, when he treated a pediatric patient after a television had fallen on the child; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg received a Certificate of Valor for his outstanding performance, while off duty, when a tornado hit Wal-mart in Colonial Heights in August 1993; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was recognized with a Unit Citation for his actions during the successful extraction of two members of law enforcement after their vehicle was struck from the rear by a boom truck carrying building materials, forcing the patrol car under a parked chocked dumpster carrier in September 1993; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg received a Unit Citation in October 1993 for his diligent and dedicated performance during an extended extrication of trapped patients in a vehicle that flipped onto its passenger side after striking and twisting around a large tree; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was recognized with an EMS Lifesave Award for his skills that contributed to a successful resuscitation of a patient in full arrest in April 1994; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was also recognized with an EMS Unit Citation for his professionalism and teamwork which resulted in the successful resuscitation of a patient found in full arrest in March 1997; and WHEREAS, Firefighter Aliceburg was commended for his voluntary response to the City of Alexandria, Virginia in December 2009, and for his exemplary service while providing tactical and operational assistance to Alexandria Fire and EMS' Fire Station 203, due to their resources being overwhelmed from a massive snow storm. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the contributions of Firefighter Kenneth E. Aliceburg, expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the county, and extends their appreciation for his dedicated service and congratulations upon his retirement. ~~®'~~~ _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 - ~ AGENDA ,,.. Meetin Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.4. Su~ect: Authorize the Utilitie Planned Development Communications Antenna Residential District County Ad County Administrator: nts: Authorize the Utilities Department to file an application for Conditional Use Planned Development approval to permit a water storage tank with communications antenna use and exceptions to ordinance requirements, not to exceed one hundred fifty (150) feet, and waive the requirement for a disclosure affidavit. Summary of Information: Approval of a Conditional Use Planned Development is required for construction of a proposed 2.0 million gallon water tank. The requested site is located on county owned property located at 1801 Old Farm Road, Tax ID 743-712-5024. The remainder of the property is proposed for development as an athletic field. The Virginia Department of Health requires minimum levels of water storage within public water systems based on population served. This proposed water storage tank will replace the existing 1.0 MG water tank currently serving the Robious Pressure Zone. That existing tank is located on a site that will not allow construction of a larger water tank. The addition of the larger tank will allow the Utilities Department to continue to meet established requirements for total water storage. Preparers William O. Wright Title: Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: Yes ~ No ^ #ooon4s s Department to File an Application for Conditional Use Approval to Permit a Water Storage Tank with Use and Exceptions to Ordinance Requirements in an R-7 s. ~ VICINITY SKETCH Proposed Water Tank ~o SRQ ~ a 1. B LV DERE VI A ~a 2. AVERDE IR 3. FONT RU ~ 4. BELLAVISTA RU 5. IRON DALE RD ~ ONT R ~ ~ Proposed Water Tank ~ f ~ NO 4 N / vv ~ fi. MARBLE EAD CT 7. HOMESTE D CT KQ R NTER up RED LIO CT 9. R LION ~P w O ~~ Z N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities w .E 5 i ua - wo tet FW„ ~ ~ s $ ~ ~ ~~ Fr ~ ~~ z~ g~ a ffi ~~ w ~~ ~ 1 I r u o ' ~ g ~ ~-~ , 7 e;Wa 3 ~ ~ V Q ~ ~ ~ 7 m Y ~ ~ ~ra ~ ~ ~ ~~ s~' / ~ ~~ \ U - _ X~~. w l~4x 5`t ~~ ~ R t c E, n " ~"/ ~~~ ~S? B IZ F ~ Tl gog~ ~O'o rr l ~ . l "q¢i~ o wF~1w SYw~j ~~$°~' "' x ? ~YZ ~u= y ~ m w O C ~Ut~ p a Z A ~y F . 3 ~ ~ S ~y5~ ~~ \ I P~'\N\P ~','r~- ~ C~ ~?, 4 U ~UU ~ \~, ~ orb vA~~~~ ~ ~_~~n 6 H~~.n -11 a\j J:~g? ~ =~0 V Q ~~~3 C\ = ~ v yo ~ `a >: 7 z ~;,?z \ ati..^ \ Zh~2tl ,5~~ s x~ a}~~~ t _ S \ \ w , 67 Pb~v ~ R"bya\ \ ~~e~~~ ~ 2s \ x `` U iil ~ } \ r~~~ \ \ ,.,~ a o ` 33~='0 ~ t ~~~ '~ ~ ~=~~y~ I zr ~5'~X~~= a ~ a-. o' Vy C~~ ~ky~ 7~Y~~~~ \ ~ ~ 4 $9i. R R R Y 0 ~L V . ~~ wg aw a ~ z z ~~ U ~~~~~ _..,. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~., ~ AGENDA Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.5.a. Subject: Request Permission for an Existing Wooden Privacy Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement and a Twenty-Foot Ingress/Egress Easement Across Lot 19, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: .~1~3.~ ~ Grant John R. Weber and Anna C. Weber permission for an existing wooden privacy fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement and a 20' ingress/egress easement across Lot 19, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: John R. Weber and Anna C. weber have requested permission for an existing wooden privacy fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement and a 20' ingress/egress easement across Lot 19, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering and Comcast Cablevision. The existing storm sewer or access to the SWM/BMP will not be affected. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 00002 VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for an Existing Wooden Privacy Fence to Encroach within a Sixteen Foot Drainage Easement and a Twenty Foot IngressiEgress Easement Across Lot 19, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2 1. RED SETTS 2. MANOR HOB F, ~. FELL PONY ~ 4. HEATHCLI~ 5f LILTING BRANC J 6. WALKERS THISTLED~ ~~~ ^~ REQUEST PERMISSION FOR AN r T ~ EXISTING WOODEN PRIVACY FENCE ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ PR ESCOTTS L E ,~,`~ .HIDDEN SEDGE N Chesterfield County L)epartment of Utilities w ~' ~.E s I I~cl - X16.67 4et ~00~~~ _ __ .. _....._.. ..... ~.,., . . r r~ vu~cn i Vf H 11 1 Lt O BINDER. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. ' BOUNDARY INFORMATION FROM A PLAT BY KOONTZ-BRYANT ENTITLED: FOXCREEK "PRIMROSE AT FOXCREEK SECTION 2" DATED JUNE 8, 2007 AND D.B 56~6MP GT 1947 RECORDED IN PB. 183, PGS. 23-25 PARCEL ID# THIS PLAT REPRESENTS A PHYSICAL SURVEY 713674763600000 . • ~ .~ • .<~ ~. S 71.41'30" W "'~--^~ ,~ ~ F~uRE~~ ` ,~' • .f'~'~ X142.09'. ~ \ ~ .r~11N/BM~~ ..~"~~'• `=l EXISTING ~ , ~ ~ 0~,0 EASEMENTr-~ v' ~~: ~ 16' DRAINAGE Ic-,~-~ ~-~ i ~ I I EASEMENT N v~l BUFFER ~QO 4 a ~~, ~ _ XX- FENCE T ~_ `~ N PG.6223 4a~OO° .~ ` ~ X13 ~~ LICENSED A_ REA'~ ~ ~~ N ___. - J~ r~ 1 a ~~~~ I 'II 3 _- ~ -- I ~v 31453 S0. FT. r _ --~ ~ ;In _ -- ~ MFF(FP)=212.50 oN __ -- ~ 18 Iz -~~ 31091 S0. FT. EXISTING 'O MFF(FP)=211.00 ~ ; 20' INGRESS/EGRESS O ' EASEMENT John R. Weber 2 1-OODBN ~ ~ Anna C. Weber PItZIVACY is :; 6437 Burnt Mills Ln CS ~~ DB. 8903 PG. 449 '~ ~~ PIN: 712673865300000 ~; W i ~ i ~ _ ~ BR CK &RFRAME '~ ~~ BR CK RY ao ~ c5 _I ; ~ "; FRAM & 431 Z~ I II ~; #6437 ~ 1 N O~ .. "° I; ; ~ ~ ~ ; II~ ~ ~ ~ 1 N , ~^~ ~ To L=93.84' `CONC~ f ~:; L_g2.5s•- - ~ ~ ! z~ // 06'f R=522.00' ~~ ~ R_ THN SoFOTN ~=10'18'01» WALK I ;I NIA ~_ 0?0g'0~" WALK I ~j! l P ARR ~ ~ I CR 93.72' 9'10'15" E I I! BRG=N 42 z-! ' `°g2.46~g~4~07" E IUp! ~ BURNT44I4IlRi~,s DANE GRAVEL / /'" DRIVE / PLAT SH0IMNG FENCE LOCATION ON SECTION 2, LOT 18 & 19 PRIMROSE AT FOXCREEK MATOACE DISTRICT * CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~~, ALTN p~, __ __ _FLOOD 20NE_C-EPANFI No°. 00 35 1 00508e .~°~ G~~c~ ~~~~ ,~ ,~ ,~~, KOONTZ-BRYANT, P.C. O Li', R. ~~ ~ ~ SITE oEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS Llc. No. 2297 1703 N. PARHAM ROAD, SUITE 100 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23229 (804) 740-9200 (804) 740.7338 Fax .~ .4, kbpc(a3koontrbryant.com 9~ SIJRV~~ DATE: 01/20/2011 SCALE: 1" = 40' CHKD BY: ERA DRAWN BY: ERA 0 120 JOB NO: 04447.118.00 18-19.DWG 04(D!!~5~ _ ' ,{ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY l _ _ _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~ AGENDA Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.5.b. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach Within an Eight-Foot Easement and a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 3, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2 County Administrator: Grant Donald L. Bennett and Beverly L. Bennett permission for a proposed fence to encroach within an 8' easement and a 16' drainage easement across Lot 3, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Donald L. Bennett and Beverly L. Bennett have requested permission for a proposed fence to encroach within an 8' easement and a 16' drainage easement across Lot 3, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering and Comcast Cablevision. The existing Swale will not be affected. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # 000+~~~ VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach within an Eight Foot Easement and a Sixteen Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 3, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2 F `E 2. MA 3. FE .H 5f LILTIN~ 1 s. w T, Z REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A PROPOSED FENCE ~LLSI~- T ~~G ~ ~lti~ ~ PRESCOTTS LE .~V .HIDDEN SEDGE t~~ ~ 0. SOHO TURN 1 N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities , f. - w - -E s 1 hcl - 116.E Eet ~~Q~eb~ ~. P //// .. de+,o~g ~~ looa~oh ~ . ~ernce le -tz7 be. `~ .h l~s~ env cx~ck~ ~~,,,~ v rl ~~ ~~ • QS shy u5 r nq 5 ~ Eck e`ts w ~-~', 1 l2 S(x~c..lr~ .be-~wee,~ 81,a.~~ . 8' Easement ~erxe h er~1~ shall be 5q ~ a5 pdrrn~+~ed. . __ . ~~~~ S' -~-~--- /~J~ 3 Y L ~ ~~ ~ ~ 18.1' i Qf - --~---~~-•rTrs-v C? ~XI~TINC ~~~ o _ ~ 6' DRAINAGE EasEt~~~ ~ r, ~+- .. --~. - t i " ~ ~ ///// -FENCE' i ~ j gI ~ ~ LICENSED AREA r i i t t . rn 19 a~i 2.0' ~ ~" K~OP APRII ~~ ~EXISTIN '-' --~ 16 EASE v~ENT 1, ~u~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , N m C? r ~ ~~ ~ l~ ~ ~ *-- ~~r ~~ .` .. ~ .0 a ~`~ r ti 2.8 ~3.~' ~ Donald L. Bennett op • Beverly L. Bennett "" 6466 Burnt Mills Ln DB. 8959 PG. 956 PIN: 712673347800000 0 ~•8 8 °• ~ "~ ,,... t~ l 2.0 8.9'~ 1 t.8' ' ~' o 1 I ~.-- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : a ~ z ' N . a. 2~.0' _- __`. a PROPOSED ~ WALK o i ~ ~. ~ j , ~~ !_ ~~ c ~ ___. _ ., ,~ ~ ~ ~- o ~' ~ '~° I / -- ~~ 000~!~'~ -~..~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 „• AGENDA Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.5.c. Subject: Request Permission for an Existing Wooden Privacy Fence to Encroach Within a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement and a Twenty-Foot Ingress/Egress Easement Across Lot 18, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Grant Kevin M. Lader and Kimberly S. Lader permission for an existing wooden privacy fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement and a 20' ingress/egress easement across Lot 18, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: Kevin M. Lader and Kimberly S. Lader have requested permission for an existing wooden privacy fence to encroach within a 16' drainage easement and a 20' ingress/egress easement across Lot 18, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering and Comcast Cablevision. The existing storm sewer or access to the SWM/BMP will not be affected. Approval is recommended. DIStrICt: Matoaca Preparers John W. Harmon Title: Real Property Manager Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~04~?~~ VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for an Existing Wooden Privacy Fence to Encroach within a Sixteen Foot Drainage Easement and a Twenty Foot Ingress/Egress Easement Across Lot 18, Primrose At Foxcreek, Section 2 ~ti s ~,o R l 1. RED SE w ~- 2. MANOR H !'Y - 3. FELL PON ~ 4. HEATHC E F ~, 5 LILTING BRA p F ~ 6. WALKER ~ ~ ~° ~ .THISTLE O y ~, ~ ~' _ ~ ~ o ~~ 9 ~ o 8 !~ ~ REQUEST PERMISSION FOR ~ T AN EXISTING WOODEN PRIVACY FENCE ~~ ~~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities . w ; -' ~ E s I Ircl - ~I6.E 4et (~fl~~~~, ~. BINDER. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THATvARE NOT SHOWN ON THIStPLAT. BOUNDARY INFORMATION FROM A PLAT BY KOONTZ-BRYANT ENTITLED: FOXCREEK "PRIMROSE AT FOXCREEK SECTION 2" DATED JUNE 8, 2007 AND DEVELOPMENT INC RECORDED IN PB. 183, PGS. 23-25 D.B. 5616 P.G. 947 PARCEL ID# THIS PLAT REPRESENTS A PHYSICAL SURVEY 713674763600000 ~.•% .~ I .<' ~~. S 71'41'30" W ''~-~~ .<~ ~ ~ ~~ F~NREs ~ ~.h'I. f'~~; `~~, X742.09'./ ~. ~`.,,., •' .,r BM~~ .r~ =l EXISTING ~ O O uFNT_-.r v' ~ ~ : 16' DRAINAGE / \ ' ~ Kevin M. Laden ~ ~ ~ EASEMENT N v~,A' Kimberly S. Lader~~ ~. ~ ~s• S ~ ~ 6431 Burnt Mills Ln ~• ~~,~ ~ __ _-EX~sTEASEMENT w DB. 8777 PG. 85 ~ ~ 1 _• __-- " SE"~-R6g ,PG. 4,~_"_ SPIN: 712673975400000` _? ~:3 I'. PB~~3~~G. ~\ 01 ~-_~ '~ ' s "~_ _`~_' _- ' "XX -FENCE "r 3 LICENSED AREA ~ f `~ 31453 SO. FT, r '~ ' MFF(FP)=212.50 0 I _---" ~~~" 18 '~ ~fz ~, -'~ 31 ~ . EXISTING MFF(FP)=211.00 I ~ 20' INGRESS/EGRESS O / EASEMENT 2 1I00DEN ~ . w ~ ~ ~ '~ i 2 STORY BRICK & FRAME I~ ~ ~ I: I I ~' I ,~ 2-ST ~; BRICK & FRAM p N #6431 ~ o~~;~ E 1 ~~ #6437 ~ i U1 Upl;. _ ( ~I /I li I( ~ ~ a 't ~ - ~- _ _ ~ l L-93.84' ~ONC. 00' 522 R ( ~I; ~ _ ~ / ~ ' N M.I L°92.58'' ~ , ~ 2 R / i0 TH 0~ . = ~ WALK ~ pa10'18'Ot" I' " ' "~ ' '522.00' CONC ~ NIA " WALK ~ Z j / RGOb9'4 NE ROD 1 T I E 15 CR93.72'9~0 I B 2 ; C_g2 / 4g~9~4'07" E lo AR . q ~~ / s. BURNT ~ R~W LANE GRAVEL / ~ 44 DRIVE / i PLAT SHOWING FENCE LOCATION ON SECTION 2, LOT 18 & 19 PRIMROSE AT FOXCREEK MATOACE DISTRICT * CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA € ~~ALTH OF D - EFFECTIVE DATE:O3/1g/1983 FLOOD ZONE C- PANEL NO: 51003$ OD50 B i' ~~ j~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ' ,~~, KOONTZ-BRYANT, P.C. V ~ ~ ~~( ~' ID a SITE DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS (; I,lc. No. 2297 1703 N. PARHAM ROAD, SUITE 100 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23229 t9 04. (804) 740-9200 (804) 740-7338 Fax kbpc(a~koon trbrya nt.oom ~'D SUR~ DATE: 01 /20/2011 SCALE: 1 " = 40' CHKD BY: ERA DRAWN BY: ERA 0 120 JOB N0: 04447.118.00 18-19.DWG ~~~~~Q 1- CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 ~~ AGENDA Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.5.d. Subject: Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach within an Eight-Foot Easement and a Sixteen-Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 16, King's Farm At Riverdowns, Section 5 County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Grant James A. Riley and Michele L. Riley permission for a fence to encroach within an 8' easement and a 16' drainage easement across Lot 16, King's Farm At Riverdowns, Section 5, subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary of Information: James A. Riley and Michele L. Riley have requested permission for a proposed fence to encroach within an 8' easement and a 16' drainage easement across Lot 16, King's Farm At Riverdowns, Section 5. This request has been reviewed by Environmental Engineering and Comcast Cablevision. The existing Swale will not be affected. Approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparers John W. Harmon Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No Title: Real Property Manager # oooo~si VICINITY SKETCH Request Permission for a Proposed Fence to Encroach within an Eight Foot Easement and a Sixteen Foot Drainage Easement Across Lot 16, King's Farm At Riverdowns, Section 5 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ` ~ , Gj ~• ~ tt. ~ Q \ i ~ ~ ~ ~ v, y °ti -- ~ S G T ~ J REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A PROPOSED FENCE i sn ' C7 4 s ~ ~ o ~` ~ ~ ~ ~ N Chesterfield County Department of Utilities W ; - 'E $ I Ocl - N6.6f stet OWNER: BUILDER RESOURCE & DEV. CD. LP D.B. 6695 PG. 963 GPIN.• 724-723-042700000 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3401 POST MILL PLACE NOTE TH1S PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN LONE 'C' AS SHOWN ON FEMA COMMUNITY PANEL N0. 510035 00028, £FFECTNE DATE.• MARCM 16, 19$3. AT~RNVFRDO~S~ \ P.B. £ ~nON 4 \ \ \ PC. 71 .. \ LOT 7 7-~-- S 2T43 4~ E art \~ o ~'~its~.r,f -~ James A. Riley Michele L. Riley ` 3401 post Mill PI ' DB. 7566 PG. 33 `~ PIN: 724723042700000 32 O•. /cURB,_~~~~ al L=77.41'~~ R=50.00' ~ POST MILL~- PLACE \~ \ v \ ,~~LOT ~6\ \ 0.5766 AC. \ ~,~ \ tV ~~ • ~ ~ a\ ~ ~ ~\ RP~P~ ~~\ G c~,,, $~p~p ~ \ ~~' s'q~ ~ ,~1.2 .~ 40' R/W ~~~ ~~ o~ /~ / ' 0~~~~+ ~~~1~~FQ~~' ~\~~~ NOTf.• UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 142.50' 32'55 ;30' 15 X X -FENCE LICENSE AREA ~ V1 1 m ~ ~ -~ ~~ 1J ~ \ ~ 1D o ~ o \ ~~ as a,. \~+~ ~c+; \ m 8'\~~ \ \~ \, ~.. \ ~o , \ ~• \~ \ \ \ \ ', \ ~\ PLAT SHOWING IMPROVEMENTS ON LOT 7 6, PLAN OF "KING'S FARM AT RIVERDOWNS', SECTION 5, IN THE MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA. TH/S SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED -LTg ~~' PURCHASERS: WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A ARE }4'6 Ply JAMES A. & MICHELE E. RILEY NECESSARILY /NDICTATE ALL ~E NOT ~~~~ tar ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. Thh ie to certify that on DECEAfBER 12, 2006, 1 mode en aecurote Fleld Survey o! the ~ promfaea shown hereon; that all improwmente and easements known a visible an RICHARD T. MI shown hereon; that tMre ore no encroachments by improwmenb either from adjoining Csrtlflaats No. premises or from subject premises upon adjoining promlaee, other than os shown hereon. t ~Z~`Q~D(~ POT"!'S, M1IVTTR and ASSOCIATES, P.C. v-y rtvsY~a~ Eagiaeers, Lead Surveyors, Lead Plnaaers pate: 12-12-06 9520 Courthouse Roed Saute: 1 =40' Richmond, Virgfaia 23238 d.N. 0612-06 JJH (804) 746-2878 l.lL"Q~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.6. Subject: ZIP Code Realignments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the County Administrator to file an official request to the United States Postal Service for changes in alternative mailing addresses for certain ZIP Codes in the county Summary of Information: County staff has been working with the United States Postal Service CUSPS) for several years to implement changes to mailing addresses in the county that have names associated with other localities. Several rounds of meetings have been held with the U.S.P.S. and in the community regarding this issue. The options below provide the impacted addresses that include Chesterfield. this voluntary option. ZIP Codes the voluntary option to use Community meetings showed support for 1) The following ZIP Codes will have the option of using "North Chesterfield" for the mailing addresses that are in Chesterfield County: 23224, 23225, 23234, 23235, 23236, and 23237. This is referred to as an Alternative Last Line location name. Richmond will reman~the Default Last Line location. This change will allow the continued use of "Bon Air" for the 23235 ZIP Code. Preparers Louis G. Lassiter Title: Assistant County Administrator Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No ## (~~inra64 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) 2) The following ZIP Code will have the option of using "South Chesterfield" for the mailing addresses that are in Chesterfield County: 23803. This is referred to as an Alternative Last Line location name. Petersburg will remain the Default Last Line location. 3) The following ZIP Code will have the option of using "South Chesterfield" for the mailing addresses that are in Chesterfield County: 23834. This is referred to as an Alternative Last Line location name. Colonial Heights will remain the Default Last Line location. _..~, ,,,. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.7. Subject: State Road Acceptance County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of resolutions for referenced state roads acceptance. Summary of Information: Bermuda District: Ramblewood Forest Section 2 and the remainder of Section 1 River Haven Avenue at Rivermont Matoaca District: Woolridge Road Extension to Magnolia Green Preparers Richard M McElfish Title: Director, Environmental Engineering Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # ~~~~~.~ TO: Board of Supervisors • FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - RAMBLEWOOD FOREST SECTION 2 AND THE REMAINDER OF SECTION 1 DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: March 23, 2011 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: ASTWOOD COVE DR CLARENCE COVE DR LITWACK COVE DR MANGROVE BAY CT MANGROVE BAY DR MANGROVE BAY TER PARSONS BAY DR WARWICK LONGBAY DR Vicinity Map: RAMBLEWOOD FOREST SECTION 2 AND REMAINDER OF SECTION 1 J~G~ O~ Q ~S ~O ~~ ~~ ? w O ~ Py IA ~~~~~ U r z U `iO F o~ ss NOR UDA NU y~~' GP ~ ,~~ J 2 ~ ~ ~ OLD BERM ~~~ 2~ ~ ~ ~ 02 ` U ~~ DERBYCREEK LN ~~ X ~? 2,~~, 5 J 2 ~ m ~Q a ~ C7 ~ / per, ~l v` ~~m C G \ J h' ~ /~P ~ D~ O a U U S !y OL~ ~O ~~ ENON O ~ REEN n c~ O 9"A ~ ~P \ AKS LN A RCHAR CT .~ ~ ~ p D R -p O~ \~ ~ r1HILL PL Z d~O~ 5~Py ~O~ T~'4 G° R P~ ~ Fg~ ~ F'P O 0~ ~' Q `5 ~~Py n~ ~ OJ `~~ G~ tiORNHrCL O DR 9~ ?i ~ R/ ~GF Gp, y / ~P ~/ ° ~ ~ V~ ~ ,`O V O N~ m ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~'L Q~ U ~9~ ~J ~ Q ~~ ~ ~ ~ F- D O < Ao ~ D P,~~ ~ a~ s,~ m ~ a w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~o S~ GS ~ RUN ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q R OCk/y O A VF G~ GREYLEG U DO <~ 0P PGG0 N CT ~ ~ O O VE ATH LN ~ jp8 o0 ? O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `" o ~ ? o = r O ~ ~ ROCkeAS D ~ 2 z a ~ KET CN z J~ ~ ~ Produced By Cheatertleld County GIS Y r k` TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -River Haven Avenue at Rivermont DISTRICT: BERMUDA MEETING DATE: March 23, 2011 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: RIVER HAVEN AVE Vicinity Map: River Haven Avenue at Rivermont IVER < ~ K AVE ~PV E N ~D rFR BLVD ~ ~ ~ ~" 9 ~ ~ ~~~~ N 6 NPG~ ~a n~ ER RIVER ~p cS~ ~~ SHARE P1- ~~ ~ -O ~ NAVE Q- ~~RO O N~ 2< Q ~' ~ S U n ~ ~ mG0 ~w L ~ m ~ ~ Q ?~ ENON AVE _z r BF ~ ~ RM~~q ~' w ~~~ gP~~ o a 2 Q ~y Gti O,Q 'Q2~ ~O z ~L ~2 ELF ~O ~ V~ ~ J~ VS ~~ ~ ~O~ 'AiL ,~ ON ~~A ~ ?'o `~ J ~G\R ~~ ti~d~ ~ ~ '~o ti o g~~ ~ o ~ tN ~~iPj, MA ~~ z y~ ~ c r ~ m ~ 0 224 S~~A a v~ ~ Fy Produced By Chesterfield County GIS ~~l*~!~ S TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Department of Environmental Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance -Woolridge Road extension to Magnolia Green DISTRICT: MATOACA MEETING DATE: March 23, 2011 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: CHAMPIONSHIP CROSSING GREAT WILLOW DR SILK OAK DR WEEPING CHERRY LN WOOLRIDGE RD Vicinity Map: Woolridge Road extension to Magnolia Green vT~ a ~ ~O -9~ m~ P~,~`EAF LN ~~~ ~-p ~ N~ v~ ~ ~ ESN T RL Z o p'I~~~ o F ~~~~C H D R ~ ~ ~~P~S ~ \OG~~O n n WOOLR ~ D D s/ ~ C~OA K DR ~ v m ~ z 0 = HOSTA LN BEGONIA DR ~ X z LAVENDER LN ~ C~ Produced By Chesterfield County qS ~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 - AGENDA ~x9 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.8. Subject: Appropriation of Funds, Authorization to Enter into Agreements and Authorization to Award Construction Contract for Nash Road at Beach Road Right Turn Lane Improvement Project County Adm County Administrator: Board Action The Board is requested to: 1)appropriate $63,000 in road cash proffers from traffic shed 17; 2)authorize the County Administrator to proceed with the design and enter into the customary VDOT and environmental permits/mitigation agreements; and 3)authorize the County Administrator to award a construction contract up to $51,000 to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Summary of Information: Traffic delays are occurring at the Nash Road/Beach Road intersection. Construction of a right turn lane on Nash Road will help traffic turning onto Beach Road. The preliminary cost estimate for the project is $63,000. Preparer: R.J.McCracken Preparer: Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Transportation Title: Director, Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # ~~0'D~i9 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA The Board requested this project in May 2004, appropriated $59,519 in cash proffers from traffic shed 17 and authorized staff to proceed with the right turn lane project. After consultation with VDOT in 2004, the scope expanded to a free flow right turn lane with an acceleration lane along Beach Road. This scope was beyond what was anticipated or funded and the project was placed on hold. In 2009 the project was cancelled and the funds returned to the traffic shed. Mr. Holland has since received requests from citizens for a right turn lane improvement. Staff has had recent preliminary meetings with VDOT about the proposed improvement and they agree that a right turn lane with standard stop sign condition can be accomplished without the need to provide additional lanes on Beach Road. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1) Appropriate $63,000 in road cash proffers from traffic shed 17; funds are available in shed 17 to appropriate. 2) Authorize the County Administrator to proceed with the design and enter into the customary VDOT and environmental permits/mitigation agreements; and 3) Authorize the County Administrator to award a construction contract up to $51,000 to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. DIStI'ICt: Dale ~~~~~~ Nash Road at Beach Road Right Turn Lane Improvement Project NA~~H RQAD AT BEACH RQAD RIGHT TURN LANE 0 200 400 800 ~ ®~ Feet ~ ~ ^ ~~ ~r • ~ ~+ re r®i m age ry -capyrg et o ~~ can mo erea ro ofV Ig I la Copyrgl t0 2an5 C 1e st rh tl Coe ry Nash Road at Beach Road Right Turn Lane Improvement Project Budget Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Studies $2, 000 Right-of-way and Utili Relocations $0 Construction $51, 000 Construction Contingency $5, 000 Construction Administration and Ins ection $5,000 TOTAL $63, 000 ~~~~~'~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ,„, -- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.9.a. Subject: Resolution Recognizing George E. Duval, III, Utilities Department, Upon His Retirement County Admin County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Mr. George E. Duval, III will retire from the Chesterfield County Utilities Department on April 1, 2011, after more than 21 years of service. Preparers George B. Haves Title: Assistant Director Utilities Department Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # (~~0~'~4 RECOGNIZING MR. GEORGE E. DUVAL, III UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Mr. George E. Duval, III will retire from the Chesterfield County Utilities Department on April 1, 2011; and WHEREAS, Mr. Duval began his public service with the county on January 2, 1990, as a Laboratory Supervisor and was promoted to Plant Manager on April 22, 1996, where he served faithfully until his retirement; and WHEREAS, Mr. Duval directed the operations and maintenance of the Addison-Evans Water Production and Laboratory Facility, formally known as the Swift Creek Water Plant, a conventional 12-million-gallon per day high rate water filtration plant and a bacteriological and chemical state certified potable water laboratory; a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitted sludge lagoon; two class I dams on Falling Creek and Swift Creek Reservoirs; monitoring, treatment and protection of the 1,700 acre Swift Creek Reservoir as a public water supply; technical direction and field supervision to a staff of 28 employees, with 4 direct report managers and was responsible for the development and administration of a $15 million annual operating budget; and WHEREAS, from 1990 to 2011, Mr. Duval brought the Utilities Department into the new millennium as a leader in customer service by consistently meeting and exceeding our customers' expectations and developing public relations and informational programs such as hosting numerous open-house events at the water plant to educate our citizens on the treatment and testing of the potable water; supporting the county's goal to be known for an extraordinary quality of life by providing potable water that is safe, reliable and environmentally sound by consistently meeting or exceeding all regulatory and reliability requirements; as an exemplary steward of the public trust through preparation of annual budgets that met our customers' needs in the most cost effective manner; and to be the employer of choice by selecting and maintaining a diverse, high performing work force though his seasoned leadership skills; and WHEREAS, Mr. Duval partnered with numerous community organizations to maintain the Swift Creek Reservoir as a viable drinking water source with particular focus on protecting the quantity and quality of this water source now and for future generations while meeting community aesthetic and recreational needs through development of the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed Monitoring Program; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County water customers have had the assurance that their drinking water met or exceeded all state and federal drinking water standards as the water treatment and testing programs under Mr. DuVal's direction were not only aggressive in meeting the standards, but also received additional testing and treatment above and beyond any regulatory requirements, enabling the county to maintain a perfect record of NEVER exceeding a Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum Contaminant Level or Treatment Technique, an accomplishment that is exceptional in the drinking water industry; and ~1~4~'~S • WHEREAS; Mr. Duval is well known and respected in the water industry for his commitment to providing safe and reliable drinking water as demonstrated through his participation and dedication to the Partnership for Safe Drinking Water Program, a voluntary self-evaluation program designed to achieve the optimization of treatment plant performance to provide the safest and highest quality water to the public, resulting in Chesterfield County receiving the 2008 Ten Year Director's Award, the first water plant in the Commonwealth of Virginia to obtain this honorable designation and one of only sixteen treatment plants nationally; and WHEREAS, Mr. Duval helped elevate the statue of water operators through his efforts to improve training, compensation and image and was instrumental in achieving appropriate increases in salary classifications for plant personnel by emphasizing the important role they play in public health by supplying safe and reliable drinking water to our customers; and WHEREAS, Mr. DuVal's efforts were recognized by the drinking water industry throughout his career through numerous awards, recognitions and certifications including state certification for chemical testing in 1991, recipient for the Partnership for Safe Drinking Water Phase Three Director's Award in 1998 and the Ten Year Director's Award in 2007, Virginia Lakes and Watershed Association Best Maintained Dam Award for Falling Creek Reservoir Dam in 1996 and the Swift Creek Reservoir Dam in 2002 and 2004, and Virginia Department of Health Office of Drinking Water Bronze Award for Excellence in Granular Media Filter Water Treatment Plant Performance in 2008; and WHEREAS, throughout his career with Chesterfield County, Mr. Duval displayed character, aptitude, a positive attitude and a unique ability to effectively lead in all situations and has significantly contributed in making the Chesterfield County Utilities Department effective, progressive, well-trained and widely respected. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes Mr. George E. Duval, III, and extends on behalf of its members and citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for over 21 years of exceptional service to the county. ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ p . ~ ,r, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.9.b. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing Mrs. Joan Kappel, Social Services Department, Upon Her Retirement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Adoption of the attached resolution. Summary of Information: Mrs. Joan Kappel will retire from the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of Social Services on March 31, 2011, after 16 years of dedicated service. Preparers Marsha Sharpe Title: Director of Social Services Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No RECOGNIZING MRS. JOAN KAPPEL UPON HER RETIREMENT 'WHEREAS, Mrs. Joan Kappel began her career in social work in 1977, coming to Chesterfield County as a social worker in 1994; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Kappel earned a Bachelor of Social Work degree and devoted her professional social work skills to ensuring the safety and well-being of older adults, children and families; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Kappel has been employed by Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department of Social Services since November 1994, initially working part- time in the child day-care subsidy program, then full-time since May 1995, first in the generic services intake team, and then in the adult services team; and WHEREAS, she was promoted to the position of senior social worker in January 2006, providing specialized services and team support in the generic services intake team; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Kappel was promoted to the position of social work supervisor in August 2008, assuming a leadership role in the agency and successfully managing the transition of the adult services program to an independent team; and WHEREAS, she has developed a smoothly operating and effective adult services program, including adult protective services, long-term care pre- screening, companion services, guardianship monitoring, mental health assessment, and other services, maximizing collaborative partnerships with other organizations to provide effective services; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Kappel has a reputation for providing respectful, empathetic and responsive customer service, as well as for effectively and sensitively directing the work of staff; and WHEREAS, she has continually worked to improve the social services delivery system through her contributions on agency, county, and state-level workgroups and task forces, addressing policy, practice and programs; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Kappel has represented the department on the board of CCHASM (Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Alliance for Social Ministry), and served on the Chesterfield Council on Aging, and the local Adult Services Task Force, and supported Chesterfield TRIAD Senior Day; and WHEREAS, she has been a role model for teamwork and professionalism during her tenure, and her leadership supported the vision, mission and values of the department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding contributions of Mrs. Joan Kappel, expresses the appreciation of all residents for her service to the county and congratulates her upon her retirement. ~~~~~a~ i CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.9.c. Subiect: Resolution Recognizing April 10-16, 2011, as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week" in Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognize the week of April 10-16, 2011, as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week" in Chesterfield County, in honor of the men and women whose diligence, compassion and professionalism keep our county and citizens safe. Preparers Richard F. Troshak Title: Director, Emergency Communications Center Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No 00!nn'79 RECOGNIZING APRIL 10 - 16, 2011, AS "NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATIONS WEEK" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, emergency communications officers daily serve the public in countless ways without regard for recognition received for services rendered; and WHEREAS, emergency communications officers are more than a calm and reassuring voice, but are knowledgeable and highly trained individuals who work closely with other police, fire, medical, animal control and sheriff personnel in the management of vital government communications and other services that affect the health and safety of our citizens; and WHEREAS, the work of these "first responders" is invaluable in emergency situations, and our citizens' health, safety, and well-being are often dependent on the commitment and devotion of emergency communications officers; and WHEREAS, emergency communications officers of the Chesterfield Emergency Communications Center work with all public safety partners, both internal and regional, to enhance the response of key personnel to incidents of personal and natural disasters; and WHEREAS their leadership and participation in training and other activities increase not only their knowledge, but the public knowledge of the enhanced emergency system housed within Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, each emergency communications officer serves as the vital link between public safety and other public safety organizations; and WHEREAS, each emergency communications officer has exhibited compassion, understanding and professionalism during the performance of their job in the past year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the week of April 10-16, 2011, as "National Public Safety Telecommunications Week" in Chesterfield County, in honor of the men and women whose diligence, compassion and professionalism keep our county and citizens safe. ~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.9.d. Subject: Resolution Recognizing April 2011, as "Child Abuse Prevention Month" in Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors recognize the month of April 2011, as Child Abuse Prevention Month" in Chesterfield County, in recognition" of the county's commitment to supporting safe and healthy families. This resolution will be presented at the Positive Parenting Coalition's 5"' Annual Positive Parenting Institute on March 30tH Preparers Debbie Burcham Title: Executive Director Chesterfield Community Services Board Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No # dUO4 ~1 RECOGNIZING APRIL 2011, AS "CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHEREAS, child abuse is a tragic problem, and finding solutions depends on involvement among people throughout the community; and WHEREAS, child maltreatment occurs when people find themselves in stressful situations, without community resources and without the ability to cope; and WHEREAS, 867 investigations or assessments of child abuse and neglect were conducted in fiscal year 2010 in Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, in Virginia, 44 children died from injuries attributable to child abuse and/or neglect in fiscal year 2010 with 40 of these victims being 4 and under; and WHEREAS, the severe problems of domestic violence and substance abuse are particularly prevalent and lead to children being at risk of child abuse and neglect throughout our community; and WHEREAS, the effects of child abuse have significant negative impacts on our entire community; and WHEREAS, children raised in safe and nurturing homes strengthen our county, and all citizens should be partners in helping to prevent child abuse and become more aware of its negative effects; and WHEREAS, effective child abuse prevention programs succeed through partnerships that include social service agencies, healthcare providers, schools, religious and civic organizations, law enforcement agencies and the business community; and WHEREAS, parents have the most critical influence on their children's development and need community support and education in celebrating the jobs and negotiating the challenges of parenting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors recognizes the month of April 2011, as "Child Abuse Prevention Month" in Chesterfield County, and encourages all citizens to participate in appropriate programs and activities that help protect our community's children. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.10. Subject: Approve Naming of the Stratton Park Property After Mary B. Stratton County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board is requested to name the Stratton Park property as the Mary B. Stratton Park. Summary of Information: Mr. Holland requested approval of naming the Stratton Park property as "Mary B. Stratton Park." Ms. Stratton protected the property with a conservation easement and dedicated the property to Ferrum College through her will. Ferrum College subsequently dedicated the property to the State of Virginia which has leased the property to Chesterfield County. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission unanimously recommended that the property be named "Mary B. Stratton Park." Staff recommends approval. Preparers Michael S. Golden Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: ~ Yes ^ No # CHESTERFIELD COUNTY _ _ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 ~» AGENDA Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 8.A.11. Subject: FY2012 Priority List of Transportation Needs County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: The Board is requested to approve the attached priority list and letter regarding Chesterfield County's transportation needs, and authorize both to be forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation, Commonwealth Transportation Board, and our Congressional and State Legislative Delegations. Summary of Information: Each year, the Board of Supervisors is requested to adopt a priority list of transportation needs for consideration by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) when VDOT updates their Six-Year Improvement Program. This year's update is significant because the recently adopted state transportation program will provide new state revenue. VDOT's Six-Year Improvement Program identifies projected funding for primary and interstate roads, rail, transit and other federally funded specialty projects. VDOT plans to present their draft FY2012-FY2017 Six- Year Improvement Program to the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) on (Continued on next page) Preparers R.J. McCracken Agen763 Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director of Transportation ^ No # ~~~~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 3 AGENDA Summary of Information: (Continued) April 20, 2011 and conduct public hearings in May. In April 2010, the Board adopted the attached priority list (Attachment A). Recommended changes to the Board's previously adopted priority list are shown on Attachment B. A summary of the recommended changes follows: New Priorities To Be Added To the List • Reconstruction of the Route 288/Route 360 Interchange • GRTC Commuter Bus Service • I-295/Meadowville Road Interchange Phase 2 (Loops) Project Currently Under Construction To Be Removed From the List • Route 10 (I-95 to Ware Bottom Spring Road) Widening Revised Project Descriptions • Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Rd. to Meadowville Rd.) widening - to reflect current Route 10 project under construction • Route 10 (Rt. 288 to Frith Lane) Widening - to reflect Route 10 bond project nearing construction Adjustments to Other Project Priorities • Priorities have been adjusted to reflect staff recommendations. A location map and description of the recommended priorities are attached (Attachment C). The recommended letter to be submitted to VDOT is Attachment D. The total cost of the recommended Chesterfield County priorities is approximately $422 million. The Richmond District consists of fourteen counties and nineteen cities/towns. The District's total primary and interstate construction allocation for FY2011-FY2016 was approximately $233 million. A list of the Chesterfield County projects included in VDOT's current FY2011-FY2016 Six-Year Improvement Program is shown on Attachment E. The Board will be asked later this year, when the Secondary Road Six-Year Program is presented for consideration, to establish priorities to be funded with secondary road funds. 1~~1~1Q~:~?5 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 3 of 3 AGENDA Recommendation: Staff recommends: 1) The Board approve the recommended priority list of highway projects and letter to VDOT's Commissioner Whirley; and 2) Direct the County Administrator to forward the list and letter to the Virginia Department of Transportation, Commonwealth Transportation Board, and Chesterfield County's Congressional and State Legislative Delegations. District: Countywide ' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PRIORITY LIST OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS Approved April 28, 2010 CURRENT COST IN PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION FROM TO MILLIONS 1 Route 10 6 & 8 Lanes A. I-95 Ware Bottom Springs Rd. $30.0 B. I-95 Meadowville Rd. $59.1 C. Route 1 I-95 $4.0 2 Route 60 6 Lanes Courthouse Rd. Old Buckingham Rd. $16.0 3 I-295 Interchange Meadowville Rd. $40.0 4 Route 360 8 Lanes A. Winterpock Rd. Woodlake Pky. $12.0 6 Lanes B. Woodlake Pky. Otterdale Rd. $25.0 5 Route 360 6 Lanes Route 288 Genito Road $18.0 6 Centralia Road 3 lanes Nott Lane Chester Rd. $25.0 7 Huguenot Road 6 Lanes Route 60 Alverser Dr. $4.0 8 Route 10 6 Lanes Route 288 Greenyard $20.0 9 Rt 288 Interchange Impr North West Loop Chester Road $3.0 10 Route 1 Relocate Intersection Old Bermuda Hundred Rd. $5.0 11 Powhte Parkway 4 Lanes East of Charter Colony Pky. Brandermill Pkwy. $10.0 12 New Freeways Prel. Engr. 8 A. Charter Colony Pky. Route 360 $4.0 (Powhite Pky. Ext., Right-of-Way B. Powhite Pky. Ext. I-95 $9.0 East/West, C. East/West Freeway I-85 $3.0 North/South) Powhite Pky. Ext. Construction Route 288 Woolridge Road Extension $26.0 * 13 Signalization Var. Locations Countywide $3.0 14 Sight & Sound Powhite Pky., Countywide $50.0 Barriers Route 288 15 Park/Ride Commuter Countywide $2,p Faalities Parking Lots ~ 16 Remove Tolls Powhite Pky. Ext. Chippenham Pky. Route 288 $67.6 17 High Speed Rail Chesterfield - TOTAL $436 * Requested Signal Locations Route 360 at Lynview Drive, Broadstone Road & Lynchester Drive Powhite Parkway /Old Hundred Road at Brandermill Parkway Route 60 Corridor Signal Improvements Route 10 at W. Rock Spring Road, Ecoff Avenue & Parker Lane Route 1 at Old Bermuda Hundred Road & Sand Hills Drive River Road at Pickett Avenue 'w` Long Tenn Obligations For Tolls as of 3/31/10 Cost in millions Outstanding Prinapal on Bonds $11.7 Due to Toll Facilities Revolving Account $33.2 Due to VDOT Construction Fund $14.7 Long-Term Notes Payable to Chesterfield County 8.0 Total $67.6 al ~ ~ "~ ,: Attachment A CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PRIORITY LIST OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS RECOMMENDED CHANGES March 23, 2011 RECOMMENDED PREVIOUS PROJECT DESCRIPTION FROM DRIORrrv PRIf1RITV TO CURRENT COST IN MILLIONS NEW 1 not on Ilet Route 288 Intercha a tm rovament Route 380 f72.0 2 2 Route 60 6 Lanes Courthouse Rd. Ok1 Buck' ham Rd. f16.0 3 1.C. Route 10 6 Lanes Route 1 I-95 $4.0 4 4.A. Route 360 8 Lanes Winte k Rd. Woodlake Villa e P f42,9 f15.0 5 8 Route 10 6 Lanes Route 288 Frith Ln $20,0 $14.0 8 5 Route 380 6 Lanes Route 288 Gentto Rd f18.0 7 1.B. Route 10 6 Lanes t-96 Bermuda Trion b Rd Meadawville Rd. ffi9.i f30.0 8 10 Route 1 Intersection Im rovement Okl Bermuda Hundred Rd. 55,0 9 11 Powhite Parkwa 4 Lanes East of Charter Cobn P Brandernill P f10.0 10 4.B. Route 360 6 Lanes Woodlake Vila e P Otterdale Rd. $25.0 11 Funded 8 Centrally Road 3 Lanes Nott Ln Chester Rd. f25.0 12 7 Hu uenot Road 6 Lanes Route 60 Aberser Dr. q,p Funded Interchange Improvement, 13 9 Rt 288 Northwest Loo Chester Rd $3.0 14 12 New Freeways: Prel. Engr. & Rgh4of--Way A. Powhtte Pkwy Ext 8. EasT/West C. North/South A. Charter Cobny Pkwy. B. Route 360 C. EasWVest Freewa A. Route 360 B. I-95 C. I-85 A. f4.0 B. $9.0 C. $3.0 15 12 Powhite Parkway 4 Lanes, Extended At rode Intersections Route 288 Wooirid a Rd Ext $26.0 ` 16 ` 13 S' nalizatbn Var. Locations (see bebw Coun 53.0 17 14 Sight & Sound Barters Powhila Pkwy., Route 288 Countywide 550.0 Varbus Locations 18 15 Park/Ride Faciities Commuter Parkin Lots Countywkle f2 0 " 19 16 Powhtte Pk Removal Tolls see bebw Chippenham Pkwy. Route 288 f6~G f83.8 20 17 H h S d Rail Chesterfield NEW Routs 380 21 NEW not on Ibt Commuter Bus 3 rin Run Road Ci of Richmond f0 ear 22 DELETE 3: Ph 1 UC I-295 Loo Meadowville Rd. 549.0 $20.0 UC 1.A. Route-3A 6-8.8kassee ~gy S3D0 DELETE UC: Under Construction; delete from Ilst TOTAL $422.2 Ph 1 UC: Phase 1 is Under Construction; Project revised for Phase II Funded: Project funding shown b VDOT FY11-FY17 SYIP ` Requested Sional Locatbns Route 360 at Lynview Drive, Broadstone Road 8 Lynchester Drive Powhite Parkway /Old Hundred Road at Brendermill Parkway Route 60 Condor Signal Improvements Route 10 at W. Rock Spring Road, Ecoff Avenue & Parker Lane Route 1 at Okl Bermuda Hundred Road & Sand Hilts Drive River Rgad at Pickett Avenue #* Lona Term Obligatbns For Tgis as of 3/31/10 Cost in millions Outstanding Principal on Bonds f6.0 Due to Toll Faciities Revolving Account $35.1 Due to VDOT Constructon Fund f14.7 Long-Tenn Notes Payable to Chesterfield County $~ TOTAL $63.8 „ Attachment B Recommended Priority List of Highway Projects i 1. Route 288/Route 360 Interchange Improvement 2. Route 60 (Courthouse Rd to Old Buckingham Rd) Widening 3. Route 10 (Rt 1 to I-95) Widening 4. Route 360 (Winterpock Rd to Woodlake Village Pkwy Widening 5. Route 10 {Rt 288 to Frith Ln} Widening 6. Route 360 (Rt. 288 to Genito Rd} Widening 7. Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Rd to Meadowville Rd) Widening 8. Route 1 at Old Bermuda Hundred Intersection Improvement 9. Powhite Parkwa~r (East of Charter Colony Pkwy to Brandermill Pkwy) Widening 10. Route 360 ~Woodlake Village Pkwy to Otterdale Rd} Widening 11. Centralia Road (Nott Ln to Chester Rd) Widening 12. Huguenot Rd (Rt 60 to Alverser Dr) Widening 13. Route 2881Chester Rd Loop 14. Powhite Pkwy Extension, East-West Freeway, North-South Freeway Prel Engr & Right-of-Way 15. Powhite Pky Extension {Route 288 to Woolridge Rd Ext) 4 Lanes 22. I-29~IMeadowville Rd Interchange Loops NOT SHOWN ON MAP: 16. Signalization 17 Sight and Sound Barriers 18. Park and Ride Facilities 19. Removal of Tolls on Powhite Parkway 20. High Speed Rail 21. Route 360 Commuter Bus ~~~~4~•/ vamlFEk7>M 17yhl~pdaly m1p X11 ATTACHMENT C Page 1 of 4 Ma rr~h 7'~ 7[l 11 RECOMMENDED PRIORITY PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 1. Route 288/Route 360 Interchange Improvement Proiect -Traffic exiting Route 288 southbound to Route 360 westbound (over 1,600 vehicles during the peak hour) backs up onto Route 288 during the evening commute period restricting through traffic on Route 288 to a single lane. Route 288 and Route 360 carry 56,000 and 74,500, respectively, in the vicinity of the interchange. The proximity of the Route 360/Old Hundred Road/ Commonwealth Center Parkway intersection contributes to the congestion at the interchange. 2. Route 60 (Courthouse Road to Old Buckingham Road) Widening Proiect -This section of Route 60 is carrying approximately 46,000 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 71,000 vehicles per day by the year 2030. The project involves widening Route 60 to six lanes. 3. Route 10 (Route 1 to I-95) Widening Proiect -This section of Route 10 carries 42,500 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 82,000 vehicles per day by the year 2030. The presence of many commercial entrances and crossovers on Route 10 in the short distance between the I-95 interchange and the Route 1 intersection contributes to congestion and accidents on the roadway. 4. Route 360 (Winterpock Road to Woodlake Village Parkway) Widening Proiect -This section of Route 360 carries 35,400 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 50,800 vehicles per day by the year 2030. Traffic in the afternoon, traveling westbound on Route 360 experiences a bottleneck as Route 360 westbound transitions from four to two lanes in 2,000 feet. Morning traffic, traveling eastbound on Route 360 experiences delays at the Woodlake Village Parkway intersection. Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Funds ($1 million in FY14) have been allocated toward this project. Additional funding is necessary to complete the project. 5. Route 10 (Route 288 to Frith Lane) Widening Proiect -This section of Route 10 carries 40,000 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 75,000 vehicles per day by the year 2030. The project involves widening Route 10 to six lanes. 6. Route 360 (Route 288 to Genito Road) Widening Proiect -This section of Route 360 carries approximately 41,000 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 58,500 vehicles per day by the year 2030. The project involves widening Route 360 to six lanes. 7. Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowyille Road) Widening Proiect -This section of Route 10 carries over 49,000 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 84,500 by the year 2030. This project involves widening Route 10 to six lanes. 8. Route 1 at Old Bermuda Hundred Road Intersection Improvement -The intersection of Old Bermuda Hundred Road and Route 1 has less than desirable sight distance for motorists on Old Bermuda Hundred Road entering traffic on Route 1 and has been identified as a high accident location. Improvements to the intersection are needed to provide better sight distance. Funds for this project have been requested through the Richmond Area MPO. ATTACHMENT C Page 2 of 4 ~"~''~'n'~~ 9. Powhite Parkway (East of Charter Colony Parkway to Brandermill Parkway) Widening Proiect -This section of Powhite Parkway carries approximately 21,000 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 25,000 vehicles per day by the year 2030. The Route 288 project included construction of two additional lanes on Powhite Parkway from Route 288 to east of Charter Colony Parkway. This project will extend the four lanes to Brandermill Parkway. 10. Route 360 (Woodlake Village Parkway to Otterdale Road) Widening Proiect -This section of Route 360 carries approximately 21,700 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 38,900 vehicles per day by the year 2030. The project involves widening Route 360 to six lanes. 11. Centralia Road (Mott Lane to Chester Road) Widening Proiect -Centralia Road carries between 10,000 and 13,400 vehicles per day. A high number of traffic accidents are occurring on Centralia Road between Nott Lane and Chester Road. The construction of a third lane to accommodate left turns would help address the accident problems. 12. Huguenot Road (between Route 60 and Alverser Drive) Widening Proiect -This section of Huguenot Road is carrying approximately 40,000 vehicles per day. Regional Surface Transportation Funds ($4 million through FY12) have been programmed to construct the missing sections of the third lane on both directions of Huguenot Road. VDOT has begun preliminary engineering. The project is expected to be advertised for construction in Fa112012. 13. Route 288/Chester Road Interchange Improvement Proiect -Construction of the northwest loop is needed to improve the movement of traffic from northbound Route 288 to southbound Chester Road. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Funds ($3 million) have been programmed for this project. VDOT has begun preliminary engineering. The project is expected to be advertised for construction in Fa112012. 14. Powhite Parkway Extension; East-West Freeway; North-South Freeway -Preliminary engineering and right-of--way acquisition are necessary for the county's outer beltway (Powhite Parkway Extension from Charter Colony Parkway to Route 360; East-West Freeway from Route 360 to Interstate 95; and North-South Freeway from East-West Freeway to Interstate 85). Preliminary engineering is needed to properly identify the location of the beltway. Right-of--way should be acquired where growth threatens to block the corridors. 15. Powhite Parkway Extension (Route 288 to Woolridge Road Extended) Widening Proiect - This project involves construction of four lanes of the Powhite Parkway with at-grade intersections at Charter Colony Parkway, Brandermill Parkway and Woolridge Road. 16. Signalization -The installation of traffic signals is needed at various intersections. Signalization requests on primary roads received through Board members include: Route 360 at Lynchester Drive; Route 360 at Lynview Drive; Route 360 at Broadstone Road; Powhite Parkway/Old Hundred Road at Brandermill Parkway; Route 10 at Ecoff Avenue; Route 10 at Parker Lane; Route 10 at West Rock Spring Drive; River Road at Pickett Avenue; Route 1 at Old Bermuda Hundred Road; Route 1 at Sand Hills Drive; and signal improvements along the Route 60 corridor. ATTACHMENT C Page 3 of 4 'Q'~'~~~,~- 17. Sight and Sound Barriers (Powhite Parkway and Route 288, various locations) -These barriers are needed to reduce the impacts of the roadways on adjoining neighborhoods. 18. Park-and-Ride Facilities -Preliminary engineering is required to identify potential park-and-ride facility locations. These facilities will be needed in the future to help reduce countywide traffic congestion. 19. Removal of Tolls on the Powhite Parkway -Funding is needed to retire the debt on Powhite Parkway from Chippenham Parkway to Route 288 which will allow the tolls to be removed. Debt on the Powhite Parkway is a combination of the principal on bonds, Toll Facilities Revolving Account debt, VDOT Construction Fund debt and long-term notes debt. 20. High Speed Rail -Funding is necessary to develop high-speed rail service in Chesterfield County and the region. Stimulus funds ($75 M) have been programmed for high-speed rail improvements between Richmond and Washington D.C. No funds have been programmed for improvements south of Richmond. 21. Route 360 Commuter Bus Service - GRTC's Route 82 (Hull Street/Commonwealth 20 Express) is operated with funds from VDOT's Six Year Improvement Plan (SYIP). Based on funding shown in the SYIP and GRTC estimates, funds for the service will not be available after FY12. Currently, it costs approximately $400,000/year to operate the service. Unless VDOT allocates additional funds toward the service, it will be discontinued July 1, 2012. 22. Interstate 295/Meadowville Road Interchange Proiect, Phase II (Loops) - Phase I of the I- 295/Meadowville Interchange is under construction. Additional funding will be needed to construct the loops to complete the full cloverleaf interchange. ATTACHMENT C Page 4 of 4 !~'~ ~1 a(1~? March 24, 2011 Gregory A. Whirley, Sr. Commissioner VA Department of Transportation 1401 E. Broad Street Richmond, VA 23219 SUBJECT: VDOT FY12-FY17 Six-Year Improvement Program Chesterfield County Priority Projects Dear Commissioner Whirley: On behalf of the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, I am submitting Chesterfield County's priority list of highway projects. Chesterfield County is requesting funding for the projects and asking that this priority list be entered into the Richmond District Public Meeting record for the FY12-FY17 Six- Year Improvement Program. Our top four priority projects are highlighted below: Our number one priority is improvements to the Route 288/Route 360 Interchange. Traffic volumes on Route 288 and Route 360 in the vicinity of the interchange are high, and the proximity of the Route 360/Old Hundred Road/Commonwealth Center Parkway intersection contributes to the congestion at the interchange. Traffic exiting Route 288 southbound to Route 360 westbound backs up onto Route 288 during the evening commute period restricting through traffic on Route 288 to a single lane. The county's second priority is the widening of Route 60 to six lanes from Courthouse Road to Old Buckingham Road. This section of Route 60 is carrying approximately 46,000 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 71,000 vehicles per day by the year 2030. The county's third priority is the widening of Route 10 between Route 1 and I-95. This section of Route 10 carries 42,500 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to 82,000 vehicles per day by the year 2030. Many existing commercial entrances and crossovers on Route 10 in the 0.3 mile between the I-95 interchange and the Route 1 intersection contribute to congestion and accidents on the roadway. ATTACHMENT D Page 1 of 2 (~'~J~1~1~'~ Finally, our fourth priority is the continuation of the recent widening of Route 360. Route 360 needs to be ~,videned from Winterpock Road to Woodlake Village Parkway. This section of Route 360 carries 35,400 vehicles per day. This volume is expected to increase to between 50,800 vehicles per day by the year 2030. Traffic in the afternoon, traveling westbound on Route 360 experiences a bottleneck as Route 360 westbound transitions from four to two lanes in a distance of 2,000 feet. Morning traffic, traveling eastbound on Route 360, experiences delays at the Woodlake Village Parkway intersection. Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Funds ($1 million in FY14) have been allocated toward this Route 360 project. Additional funding is necessary to complete the project. If you need additional information or clarification, please let us know. We look forward to the construction of these important projects. Sincerely, Arthur S. Warren Clover Hill District Chairman, Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: The Honorable Members of the Chesterfield Congressional Legislative Delegation The Honorable Members of the Chesterfield State Legislative Delegation The Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors James J. L. Stegmaier, County Administrator William Dupler, Acting Deputy County Administrator R.J. McCracken, Director of Transportation Thomas A. Hawthorne, District Administrator ATTACHMENT D Page 2 of 2 W C O V Q d V as 'o V a co 0 N } G R L L a m E as 0 C. t0 d k C N H 0 N O N LL C fA O to Q r N } N O O O c 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 o v r» ~ ~ cfa eg g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~D o 0 T d9 ER O In O O O O O O O O O O lL) b4 to b9 b4 H9 d9 ~ dT H9 b9 E9 ~ ~ r ~3 ~ ~ LL N O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 O B O O M O b4 M K! to O EH EA O d9 ~ GR f+9 ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GH _~ Q O 01 ~ O O O O O O CD ~ O ~ 69 M ~ to GR d9 69 H4 ~? O N 0 ~ 0 0 d T H> b9 ~ 69 EA N (,~ ~ Ef3 H J d . ~ O d o rn o 0 0 ~ o 0 0 o co O 07 ~ O H4 1~ EA d9 d3 CD M f~ ~ N o ~ ~ ° ~ v ~ ~ rn ~ 3 ~ ~3 ~ LL O O O Ln O O O O O O LL7 N N d4 Ef3 EA d3 M b9 O t!J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EA EA EA H4 Ef) ~ } b4 b4 LL N N M O ~ O O O O O CD I~ ~ O to O H? M ~ Vi Ef! ~ ~ N ~ ~ 00 ~ C 0 ~ N ~ ~ ~ d 9 EA E{? ~ L 3 a LL o d ~ '~ ~ ~ M M t0 M N ~ N I~ ~ M J Q L ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N O y = ~ U c N N ~ O ~ O ~ Q ~.' c ~ N ' E • a i ~ ~ o V V C N O O ~ O O 0 M N 16 O J ( C J ~ f 4 J ~ N J CD (O N ~ ~ ~ ~ U N ~ C C 0) 3 N 3 C C ~_ N ~ ~ a a ;D O N O U U L ~ , C _ m J ~ ~ m (/) C Cn ~ ~ ~ T ~ a' i o fn ~ U Y N U f6 "O U N Y O L ~ O •~ a _ 2 O O ~ U d ~ ~ ~ O Of d " a o Q U c ~ a i a _ O H U N ~ ~ v ~ U O = L.L c a a Y p ' ~° U U Q a (C g UQ j ~ ~ o- a ~ o ° ? o ~ ~ 4? ~ m ~ - ~ ~ m a U ~ ' d L N ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ C M ~ a T O m 0 ~ O 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O . .. O ~ o L ~ O to 0 ~p 0 ~p .~ N a -p U ~ ~ O C (a 77 7 O Y N ~ p -p (6 °-~ a ~ ai m m` 0 ~ ~ a _ ~ ° m ~ ~ rn ~ 3 0 ~ o m w -o v ~ O s ~ v a~ ~ a O Y O O ~ N o ~ ~ Md ~ ~ ~ U ti m O ~ 4? ~ 3 ~ 0) o o •~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ as 'c 'c Y o •0 3 0 -~ ~ ° = ° ~ ~ ` ° ` z ` m ° i ~ i ~ > c c ~ c n a a c ~ W ~~~II ^?''1 ~~W11 i~l U Q!~0~1 1719 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 9.A. Subiect: Report on Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District Improvement Funds, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Acceptance of attached report. Summary of Information: Preparers James J. L. Stegmaier Title: County Administrator Attachments: ^ Yes ^ No # QO~Q~S CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE Budgeted Ending Balances March 23, 2011 of General Fund Budgeted Expenditures* FY2008 $50,945,000 7.5% FY2009 $53,495,000 7.7% FY2010 $53,495,000 8.1% FY2011 $53,495,000 8.3% *The County's financial policy states the targeted fund balance level is 7.5%. 0~(1~~~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS March 23, 2011 Board Meeting Date Description Amount Balance FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2009 4/15/2009 FY2010 Budgeted Addition $14,021,400 $19,632,088 4/15/2009 FY2010 Capital Projects (14,021,400) 5,610,688 4/14/2010 Substitute funding for Circuit/General District Courthouse (832,500) 4,778,188 expansion. FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2010 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 BEGINNING JULY 1, 2010 4/15/2010 FY2011 Budget Addition 13,169,200 17,947,388 4/15/2010 FY2011 Capital Projects (12,962,600) 4,984,788 5/26/2010 FY2011 Part of Sports Quest funding (206,600) 4,778,188 8/25/2010 Replacement generator for the IST building (290,400) 4,487,788 8/25/2010 Replacement funding to complete projects at Clover Hill (340,000) 4,147,788 Sports Complex 11/17/2010 Renovations and Additions to the Manchester Volunteer (120,000) 4,027,788 Rescue Squad (MVRS) Project ~~Q~~~ z Hw O w U ~ o N W O N a a F ~ ~ vi F W U ~ "" U OG F^ .~ O C eQ ~ L C C. 6~ ~ a Q ~b R o ~ ~ ~ R O 'C v~ _ ~ ~ r+ Q ~ M N M 'O ~ ~ ~ A ~~ ~~ w~ ..r C o o ~, N ~ w a 0 L n. a Q w ~ ~ 0 L y,~ ~ L ~L GQ A. U ~i U C ~p M O O ~O V7 Vl 00 l~ M O~ l~ l~ N V? N M N M 69 p M ~O ~D O 00 00 ~n ~D O 00 O O v~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M M M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M M M M M M M M M 69 as b 3 ~ ~ 's u .~ tea, O R ~ ~ OQ U A ~ ~ U Prepared by Accounting Department February 28, 2011 SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED AND EXECUTED Date Original Began Description Amount / 9 P bl' Facility Lease -Juvenile Courts Project $16,100,000 04 9 u is (Refinanced 10/10) O1/01 Certificates of Participation - Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 03/03 Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation 03/04 Certificates of Participation -Building Construction, Expansion and Renovation; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 10/04 Cloverleaf Mall Redevelopment Project 12/04 Energy Improvements at County Facilities OS/OS Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Fumishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 05/06 Certificates of Participation -Building Acquisition, Construction, Installation, Furnishing and Equipping; Acquisition/Installation of Systems 08/07 Certificates of Participation -Building Expansion/Renovation, Equipment Acquisition TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED PENDING EXECUTION Description None 13,725,000 6,100,000 21,970,000 16,596,199 1,519,567 14,495,000 11,960,000 22.220.000 124.685.766 Outstanding Date Balance Ends 2/28/2011 01/20 $7,185,000 11 /21 6,170,000 11/23 3,860,000 11 /24 15,130,000 10/ 11 16,596,199 12/17 1,023,579 11/24 9,350,000 11/24 7,945,000 11 /27 18,710,000 ~$5, 69 Approved Amount ~~'~~' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA 1'N9 Meetin Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 9.B. Subiect: Report on Roads Accepted into the State Secondary System County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: rd Action Requested: Acceptance of attached report. Summary of Information: Preparers Janice Blakley Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board No # 000191 Report of changes to the highway system of County of Chesterfield County Report Period: 01/01/2011 through 01/31/2011 This document reports changes in the locality's VDOT maintained secondary system ofstate highways for the report period. Developer bonds held pending VDOT's acceptance of streets reported here may be released in accordance with the local ordinance. Route Street Name RW Width Mileage Local Gov. VDOT Effective Ut) Resolution Date Pro1e~t • Townhomes at Harbour Pointe Type Change: Addition 7508 Baycraft Terrace 51 feet 0.04 7/28/2010 1 /18/2011 Termini: From: Bayside Ln., (Rt 4703) To: Cul-de-sac 7508 Baycraft Terrace 51 feet 0.11 7/28/2010 1/18/2011 Termini: From: Bayside Ln., (Rt 4703) To: Cul-de-sac 4703 Bayside Lane var 0.03 7/28/2010 1/18/2011 Termini: From:.13m N of Hull Street Rd., (Rt 360) To: Baycraft Tr., (Rt 7508) Total Net Change in County's Mileage 0.18 For information regrading this report, contact VDOT's Residency Administrator or Central Office (Joseph Williams (804) 78t~0974) t~~~lQ2 Page 3 of 106 March 23, 2011 Speakers List Afternoon Session 1. Mr. Barry Wood 2. 3. 4. 5. In Appreciation and Honor of the Police Officers of Chesterfield County I would like to take my time to express appreciation and honor to the nearly 500 men and women who serve Chesterfield County in our Police Department. To use a Biblical analogy, they are the "watchmen on the wall" -standing guard to protect the more than 316,000 residents of our county. They work 12 months out of the year, around the clock, making sure our streets, our commercial districts and our residential communities are safe. According to Chief Dupuis' budget presentation nearly every crime category in the county is on a downward trend, or has been reduced compared to the previous year; robberies, assaults, breaking and enterings, car thefts -all down. According to the 2010 Citizen Satisfaction Survey, THEY ARE BEING SUCCESFUL! 99.4% of our citizens give Chesterfield a "Favorable Rating" when it comes to "Community Safety!" It just doesn't get much better than that! The primary reason for this has to be the commitment and effectiveness of our Police Officers in the performance of their duties -these outstanding results from an underpaid, underappreciated group of dedicated Police Officers. Our Officers do not hesitate to put their lives on the line or to stand between our citizens and the threat of violence or danger. Each day that they leave their home to patrol our streets, they never know what they will face. They must be prepared to meet with courage, skill and wisdom, whatever awaits them at either a domestic disturbance call or a routine traffic stop. The fact is, there is nothing routine about what they do. They stand between the residents of Chesterfield and the destructive, chaotic elements of our society. They stand tall and they stand proud! I salute our Police Officers for their commitment to protect and serve our citizens. I also say THANK YOU to ALL of our law enforcement officers nationwide. Nationwide, already 48 officers have given their lives this year in the line of duty (2 from Buchanan County Sherriff's Dept. here in VAS. Last year, 161 officers died in the line of duty (4 from VA). I honor their memories and their sacrifice. Thank you. Respectfully, Barry Wood 804-400-9762 March 23, 2011 Speaker's List Evening Session #1 (Following Presentation of Resolutions) 1. ~~~~~ D~ -~ ~ 2. 3. 4. 5. Evening Session #2 (End of the Evening Agenda) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA ,~o Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 16.A. Subject: Public Hearing on Proposed Ordinance Amendments Relating to Department of Utilities Fee Changes n County Administrator: Hold a public hearing on proposed ordinance amendments relating to Department of Utilities fee changes. Summary of Information: This date and time had been scheduled to hold a public hearing on proposed Utilities ordinance fee changes. The Utilities Department's analysis of the FY2012 budget, capital replacement projects, and projections over the next ten years indicate that current revenues, without fee increases, will not be sufficient to cover operating expenses. As an enterprise fund fully supported by payments from users, fee increases are necessary to offset costs of capital projects to comply with the nutrient regulations for the Chesapeake Bay, pump station rehabilitation, new and replacement water tanks, new and replacement water lines, the county's contractual share of Richmond water plant projects, as well as maintaining the integrity of the county's water and wastewater facilities. The proposed fee increases are also due in part to smaller growth rates in demand for water/wastewater services as well as new connections. The FY2012 operating budget is proposed to be 3 percent below the FY2011 adopted budget. Additional revenues are required to meet the projected longer term operating and capital costs. Even with the proposed increased fees, total revenues are expected to decrease 2 percent compared to FY2011 amounts. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information (continued) The proposed charges for a typical 5/8" residential size meter having an 18 CCF combined water and wastewater bi-monthly bill will increase by approximately $4.16 ($2.08 monthly). The increase is comprised of changes in both the commodity and base charges. The water commodity charge is proposed to increase by $0.08 per one hundred cubic feet (CCF) and is anticipated to generate an additional $1,353,000 in revenues. The water and wastewater bi- monthly base charges for a typical 5/8" residential size meter is proposed to increase by $2.72 and is anticipated to generate an additional $1,733,000. These increases are needed to cover the projected cost of rendering water and wastewater utility services and funding capital replacement projects and will increase a typical bi-monthly bill to $94.76. The base charges for larger meters increases proportionately based on meter size. In addition, the department's analysis of costs for expansion projects and projections over the next ten years reflect the need to adjust the capital cost recovery charge portion of connection fees to cover capital costs. The capital cost recovery charge fees for a 5/8" residential size meter are proposed to increase the water connection fee from $4,400 to $4,795 (generating an additional $543,000) and the wastewater connection fee from $3,455 to $3,730 (generating an additional $286,000). The capital cost recovery charge fees for larger meters will increase proportionately based on meter size. Even after the proposed rate increases (assuming a typical bill for combined services), the County's rates will still be significantly less than surrounding jurisdictions. The ordinance is attached. 0~00~~4 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 18-22 AND 18-27 RELATING TO UTILITIES CONNECTIONS FEES AND UTILITY CHARGES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 18-22 and 18-27 of the Code of the County of Chester geld, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 18-22. Connection fees. (a) The water connection fee shall be the capital cost recovery charge plus the meter installation charge based on the size of the water meter that the director installs. The wastewater connection fee shall be the capital cost recovery charge for the size of the water meter that serves the property, or, if the property does not receive water service, the size of the water meter that would serve the property if it received water service. (b) The capital cost recovery charge shall be: Customer Class Meter Number Capital Cost Recovery Charge Size of ERU's (inches) per Unit Water Wastewater (i) For a dwelling, single- 5/8 1.00 $ 4;4~8~89 $ 3~~8 family, including 4,795.00 3,730.00 townhouses,mobile homes that are not located in a mobile home park,and individually metered multifamily dwelling units. (ii) For a dwelling, two-family 5/8 1.00 4;488:98 ~;4~5:-A9 (per unit) 4,795.00 3,730.00 (iii) For mobile homes that are 0.85 3~~8 x:99 located in a mobile home 4,076.00 3,171.00 parkand for master metered multiple-family dwellings other than multiple-family dwellings used exclusively as housing for colleges and/or universities (per unit) (iv) For all other customer 5/8 1.00 4;4~8A:89 ~4~:9A classes 4,795.00 3,730.00 1 2.50 ~-1;AAA:A9 8~-38-89 11,988.00 9,325.00 ~~~'!. ~~ 0505:85432.1 1 1 /2 5.00 ?AAA: A9 ' ''T,-~-oo 23,975.00 18,650.00 2 8.00 ~ c inn nn ~o g , 38,360.00 29,840.00 3 16.00 7&4~AA:98 cc,~o 76,720.00 59,680.00 4 25.00 ~AA~AA ~8 119,875.00 93,250.00 6 50.00 ~9;AA~99 '''''T ''~-,~-oo 239,750.00 186,500.00 8 80.00 ~ c~~o9 383,600.00 298,400.00 10 115.00 ~Af;sAA:A9 2°''~~ 551,425.00 428,950.00 12 155.00 ~ G2c~-coo 743,225.00 578,150.00 The capital cost recovery charge for meters that are larger than 12 inches shall be determined by the director based on the number of ERUs per unit. (v) The capital cost recovery charge for a dwelling that is served by a meter that is larger than five- eighths inch shall be the same capital cost recovery charge in subsection (b)(iv). Sec. 18-27. Utility charges. 000 Effective with bills issued on and after July 1, ~9 2011, the consumer shall pay charges for utility service in accordance with the following schedules: (a) Monthly service charges. The monthly service charge shall be: (1) Customer cost charge. A customer cost charge of ~2 $2.44 for each service account. However, customers who have only a water account or a wastewater account shall pay a customer cost charge of $444 $4.88. (2) Commodity cost charge. (i) Water: ~:~4 $1.32 per 100 cubic feet (Ccf). (ii) Wastewater: $1.50 per 100 cubic feet (Ccf). ~~~~~~ 0505:85432.1 2 (3) Capacity cost charge. Customer Class Meter Number Monthly Capacity Charge Size of ERU's per Unit (inches) Water Wastewater (i) Dwelling, single-family, 5/8 1.00 $ 5.60 $ ~9 including townhouses and 11.52 mobile homes that are not located in a mobile home park (ii) Dwelling, two-family (per 5/8 1.00 5.60 ~A unit) 11.52 (iii) Mobile homes that are located 0.85 4.76 9~ in a mobile home park and 9.79 multiple-family dwellings other than multiple-family dwellings used exclusively as housing for colleges or universities (per unit) (iv) All other customer classes 5/8 and 1.00 5.60 ~4Fi8 3/4 11.52 1 2.50 14.00 ~9 28.80 1 1/2 5.00 28.00 S.r3-.A8 57.60 2 8.00 44.80 5489 92.16 3 16.00 89.60 ~-Fr9~9 184.32 4 25.00 140.00 2~-S:SB 288.00 6 50.00 280.00 X3&99 576.00 8 80.00 448.00 548:A9 921.60 10 115.00 644.00 ~-9.99 1,324.80 12 155.00 868.00 ~-~4~99 1,785.60 (v) The capacity cost charge for a dwelling that is served by a meter that is larger than five-eighths inch shall be the capacity cost charge in subsection (a)(3)(iv). 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0505:85432.1 3 Public Hearing #1 - 6:30 p.m. To Consider an Amendment to the County Code Relating to Utilities Fees THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO UTILITIES FEES SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. ; - - 1- - - -- - - - - -- --- UTILITIES FEES - _ - Name Organization/Address ---- -- - 1 2 _ _ -- 3 4 ; I( q -- -- - -_ 5' _ --- - _ - 6i _ 8 - 9 -- 10 i 11 12, _ - - _ - - -- - ~ 13I -- - - - -~ 14I 15 16 -_ - 17 --18 19 - - 20 -__ 21 22~ 23 24 25 26 27 _ _ - - r- _- --- -- - - -- i -- - '' -_ -- -- - - -- - _- - - - - - - _ - -_ -- - -- - --- -- - _ -- - --- - -- - 28 - - -- -- -- ----- 29I 3 - 31' - 32 ' -- - - - --- - ---- _ .,~ ~#; -- I • ~ 1 ,- _,> ~ ~~ Your Community Newspaper Since 1995 - P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • Phone: (804) 545-75(x) • Fax: (804) 744-3269 • Email: news@chestertieldobserveccom • Internet: www.chesterfieldobserver.com __ ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN:Utility Connection Fees 3-2, 9 Full Page - 2.5 in. $1181.00 Board of Supervisors The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/02/2011 & 3/09/2011 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~~ ~ day of ATTACH ~,~~ , 2011. AD HERE v ~ P~eaS~e ~ ~~ ~ Legal Affiant J e ,Grooms Jr., N ary Publi My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) R ,• •~,,, g : A~~t1E~l~ : ._ i :vim EXPIRES Qi, ; ~ ~ Z'+ 02-2~-M ~ ' ~ ~ • • ¢T 112093 ~~ ~ ~ Y• O ••.....• ~ ~~, ~'hy T~f R Y Q~,lj'. THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 '~ AGENDA ,~, Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 16.6. Subject: Public Hearing on Proposed Ordinance Amendments Relating to the Planning Department Fee Changes Administrator's Com~tc~ County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a public hearing on proposed ordinance amendments relating to the Planning Department fee changes. Summary of Information: This date and time had been scheduled to hold a public hearing on proposed Planning ordinance fee changes. The Planning Department has benchmarked with other localities on various zoning application fees and is recommending numerous changes to the fee structure to be more in line with surrounding localities in lieu of structured on a cost recovery basis. The major fee changes for various applications that are being proposed by staff are outlined below: Existing Residential Rezoning Site Plan Tentative Subdiv. $5,300 + $90/acre $2,000 + $90/acre $800 + $30/lot Existing Proposed Commmercial Fee $4,100 + $80/acre $1,200 + $80/acre $1,500 + $50/acre $600 + $50/acre N/A $800 + $20/lot Final Check Subdiv. $1,100 + $20/lot N/A $500 + $20/lot Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No ,poo~~s CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information (continued) The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed fee changes on February 15, 2011 and recommended approval of adjustments proposed by staff, with removal of fee 25a, a per acre charge for site plan adjustments/amendments. Staff estimates that the described fee changes would have an estimated cost in terms of unrealized revenue of between $130,000 (under current market conditions, with no fee holiday) and $200,000 (under activity levels more in line with long run averages). The ordinance is attached. ~~Q~.'~9 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 17-11 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO SUBDIVISION FEES AND 19-25 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND OTHER PLANNING FEES BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 17-11 and 19-25 of the Code of the County o Chesterfield 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Chapter 17 000 Sec. 17-11. Fees. In addition to any other fees required by the county, fees shall be payable to the county treasurer and submitted to the planning department upon filing the following applications: (a) Alternatives to chapter per § 17-8 ... $ X98 $400.00 Plus any applicable plat review fee (b) Appeal of decision of director of planning ... $400.00 (c) Deferral request by applicant for planning commission consideration of plat, per request:... $200.00 (d) Final check, amended and resubdivision plat review: (1) Final check subdivision plat review ... ~ $500.00 (Only one base fee will be required for final check plats required to be submitted in multiple sections per § 17-42.) Plus, per lot ... $20.00 (2) Final check resubdivision plat review ... ~9A9:99 $100.00 Plus, per lot ... $20.00 (3) Final check amended plat review ... A9 $500.00 1928:85401.1 _ i _ Plus, per lot ... $20.00 (e) Minor subdivision plat review ... $400.00 (~ Onsite sewage disposal system soils analysis review, per lot/parcel ... $155.00 (g) Parcel line modification review, per parcel ... $50.00 (h) Residential parcel subdivision, per parcel ... $60.00 (i) Tentative subdivision approval, or resubmittal of an expired previously approved tentative: (1) Original submittal, including up to two resubmittals ... $800.00 Plus, per lot ... ~A9 $20.00 (2) Renewal of previously approved tentative plat or adjusted tentative plat for previously approved tentative plat $100 00 Plus, per lot ... $20.00 {-~} ~ Third and subsequent submittal, per submittal ... ~AA:A9 $350.00 {~} ~ Substitute to approved tentative, per submittal ... $100.00 (j) Townhouse plan transfer to electronic format per § 17-32(d) ... $80.00 (k) Written verification of subdivision or written subdivision interpretation ...75.00 000 Sec. 19-25. Fees. 000 All fees provided for in this section for rezonings, amendment of zoning conditions, conditional uses, conditional use planned developments, and rezonings with conditional use and/or conditional use planned developments shall be waived up to $4,000 of the total fee, including the base fee and any per acre charge, for commercial, office and/or industrial use applications received from September 23, 2010 to September 22, 2011. Under this provision only initial submissions shall be eligible and the following applications shall not be eligible for the reduction: (i) wireless communications towers, (ii) computer controlled variable message signs, (iii) variances, (iv) deferral requests, (v) remand requests, (vi) appeals of development CHAPTER 19 1928:85401.1 - 2 - (~~®~ ~.1. standards waivers, (vii) any use incidental to a principal dwelling unit or (viii) family day care homes. The Q'~99 $600 base fee application provided for in this section for the original submittal and up to two resubmittals for site plan, overall development plan and schematic plan applications for office, commercial and industrial uses shall be waived for applications received from September 23, 2010 to September 22, 2011. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and shall expire on September 22, 2011 at 5:00 p.m. In addition to any other fees required by the county, fees shall be payable to the county treasurer and submitted to the planning department upon filing the following applications: ~,.,, ~.,~„a n rcc~~--va Fee Application Type lFE~~i n uses 1. Amend condition(s) of zoning (including conditions of rezoning, conditional use, conditional use x-389 $4,-1-99 $1,500 planned development, and textual statement) 2. Appeal to board of zoning appeals per § 19-21 ~~ ~A9 $1200 3. Building permit review, for a new single family dwelling or for each ~5 ?~ ^ ~--~~~ ~-~ $25 unit of a new two-family dwelling 4. Certain conditional uses a. Conditional use, family day care homes X399 1.1,.E n....i;,,,,t,i $300 b. Conditional use for any use incidental to a principal dwelling unit except family ~-AA9 ~8 $600 day care homes c. Conditional use for recreational facilities and grounds primarily serving X899 ;;,t ~„-aPPn~~ $150 the surrounding residential community d. Conditional use for communication towers, landfills, quarries, mines, X399 ~4~89 $4,100 borrow pits and adult businesses i. Plus per acre after first acre ~ ~ $50 5. Conditional use, all others Q'~89 Q'~-,~9 $1,500 1928:85401.1 _3 ~~'~ Q ~.'_~,.,~„~ ;~"„ ~.,~„a n Fee Application Type ~~,~ A€Fie~ uses a. Plus per acre after first acre X99 $$A $50 6. Conditional use planned development ~A9 ~g $1,500 a. Plus per acre X99 X89 $50 7. Planning Commission and Board of ~AA9 X899 $200 Supervisors case deferral requests LT„~xnci"aac~ %~~"~ (Includes "A" by the applicant, per request: ""-A ' ~ses3 ~ses3 uses 8. Board of Zoning Appeals case deferral requests by the applicant, x-38 x-38 $130 per request: 9. Manufactured home permits, new x-59 X559 $400 10. Manufactured home permits, renewal ~9 ~9 $200 11. Modifications to development standards and requirements ~g ~~ $400 12. Plan transfer to electronic format per § 19-264(f) ~9 ~~ $130 13. Planning permits __ __ __ a. Temporary family health care unit permit ~A9:A9 AT^+ ^ ..~, • ~.~ $100 14. Resource protection area exceptions per § 19-235(b)(2) for one lot or parcel used or intended to be used X99 ~`;°* ^~~,:""~-~ $300 for a single family dwelling and accessory uses 15. Resource protection area exceptions per § 19-235(b)(2), all others ~9 ~~ $300 16. Remand requests to the planning cn ~°~°°~+ °~ ~ "~'~°°"+ ~ 50 percent of commission, by the applicant, per eriR'„~__~'-~ ~ri"'""' """° ~ original case fee request ~ ~~ud~ ~ includes "A" H~ «~ uses) uses 17. Rezoning ~A9 ~9 $1,500 a. Plus per acre X99 ~S9 $50 18. Rezoning with conditional use - _ a. Base fee for rezoning ~-5-89 $4-1-A9 $1,500 i. Plus per acre X39 X89 $50 b. Base fee for conditional use X399 ~A9 $1,500 i. Plus per acre ~}8 $89 $50 19. Rezoning with conditional use planned development - - - a. Base fee for rezoning ~A9 ~4-~-A9 $1,500 i. Plus per acre X39 ~$9 $50 1928:85401.1 - 4 - ~ ~ Q •~..~. 3 z ;~eei,-l~a~sed-9 ~ Fee Application Type ~~~~ A€f~e~ Flses b. Base fee for conditional use planned development ~~ ~~ $1,500 i. Plus per acre X18 X88 $50 20. Rezoning with conditional use and conditional use planned - _ _ development a. Base fee for rezoning x-389 ~4-~89 $1,500 i. Plus per acre X98 $$9 $50 b. Base fee for conditional use X389 ~4;-~99 $1,500 i. Plus per acre X98 X88 $50 c. Base fee for conditional use planned development ~~ ~g $1,500 i. Plus per acre X98 ~S8 $50 21. Sign Permits, temporary signs as permitted by § 19-631 through § 19- X1-89 X89 $100 650 22. Sign Permits, all other signs for ~8 ~8 which building permits are required $130 23. Site plan, overall development plan and schematic plan reviews: original submittal, including up to two ~-A88 X89 $600 resubmittals a. Plus per acre X39 X88 $50 24. Site plan, overall development plan and schematic plan reviews: third and subsequent resubmittals, per ~~ ~~ $250 submittal 25. Site plan, overall development plan and schematic plan reviews: adjustment to approved site plan or $489 X3-59 $300 amendment to approved schematic plan, per submittal or resubmittal a. Plus per acre $50 26. Site plan review: appeal of decision of director of planning ~g ~8 $350 27. Special exceptions, temporary manufactured home (new) ~~ ~8 $500 28. Special exceptions, temporary ~9 ~g manufactured home (renewal) $200 29. Special exceptions, all others X998 X889 $700 30. Special exceptions, amend conditions of special exception ~A8 ~A8 $600 31. Substantial accord determinations X389 ~8 $1,500 1928:85401.1 _ 5 _ 0~~~~~ Application Type a. P1US per acre 32. Variances, administrative 33. Variances, all other 34. Verification of non-conforming use (written) 35. Zoning certificate 36. Zoning interpretation (written) `d-A~ i~rl ~A8 $3A9 tree;-mss. t~~e~i~enl uses ~9A ~A8 000 (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 1928:85401.1 -6- Fee $50 $200 $300 $75 $75 $75 Public Hearing #2 - 6:30 p.m. To Consider an Amendment to the County Code Relating to the Planning Fees THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO PLANNING FEES SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS -- -- ---- BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. PLANNING FEES Name Organization/Address 1 '..Mark James Chairman, Chesterfield Chamber of Commerce 216ob Schrum _ Chesterfield Chamber _ 3 ~i, Greg Creswell - ~'i Chesterfield Business Council __.. - _ - 4 r I ~y_~_ C ~~ - - -- --5 a~~ ce 'Q/4K -___ -- - - --- 6' vb ~?Is~~, - -- -- 7 - ~1 r~~ ~..eVi~-I'+s - - Stu-~,~~~rk ~~s;~ess SS-,. _ -- ---. - _ 8' at~~ ~Y~raSew~cZ - - ---- 9' --- -- 10' - --- - - -_ - - ~ -- --- 11 -- - - 12 --- - - - - -- 13 --- - - 14 ' -_ _ -- - - -- -- -- - -- - -- - - 151 _16 - - -~ - - -- 17 18 '' - - -- - _ - 19 - -- - - - -- 20 --- - - - - 21 - - - --- 22 -____ 23 - _ - __ - - - - 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 -- SPeq IC.~r ~#3 3 3 3 r ~, ~ GREATER RICHN4C1NL1CHQJVl6ER e ~ s : i v O °~ March 23, 2011 h The Honorable Arthur S. Warren Chairman N Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA 23832 , 0 E s Dear Mr. Warren: The Chesterfield Business Council (CBC) of the Greater Richmond Chamber commends Mr. lay c Jregma~er, ~„vunry r~aminisrraror ror requesrmg me recenr review or me coning ona running ree o Structure. The CBC would also like to commend Mr. Kirk Turner and his staff on their examination of 0. these fees and the recommended changes. Previously, the CBC supported the reinstatement of the fee a holiday in Chesterfield. At that time the CBC urged that other programs be explored to assist the county and Economic Development to advance an exceptional business friendly environment. The a recommended changes to the fee structure are consistent with the CBC's urgings. F The CBC understands these changes will not create the lowest fee structure in the area, but rather a more comparable structure. It is our understanding that the cost of such :changes would hpve to be ~` absorbed by the General Fund. However, changing the application fee structure will enable the o county to further advertise the message - "Chesterfield County IS open for business"."An increase to m the business tax base either through expansion or attraction of business to the .county wilibe an important key to our success as a First Choice Community as we move forward in these tough economic - times. m d The Planning Commission voted for these fee changes to be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors and recommends approval. The Commission advanced dianges affecting both 'residential and a commercial fees. The CBC recommends approval of these changes, in whole, as they have been put o forward by the Planning Commission. The CBC upports the fee changes for both residential and commercial and is confident the BOS will recognize residential growth. as part_and parcel``of healthy economic development. Chesterfield has weathered these tough economic times better than many other communities. It is astute business actions such as these that continue to make Chesterfield a great place to live and work. Sincerely, . ~~ ~ Y Greg Creswell, Chairman Chesterfield Business Council CH©MBER r ~ ~, ~, .~ ~ ,~~~~~~ Your Community News~xtper Since 199.5 P.O. Aox 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • Phone: (804) j45-7100 • Fax: (804) 744-3269 • Email: new~a chestertieldobserver.com • Internet: www.chesterfieldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue Chesterfield County LN:Planning Fees 3-2, 9 1.6 Pages $2060.00 Board of Supervisors The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/02/2011 & 3/09/2011 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ! 0 ~ day of ATTACH MC{ r'~ , 2011. AD HERE Legal Affiant Jam ,Grooms Jr., Notary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) •,,,,rr~r~t~„~,,t .~e'' G R 0p ~'''. .~ ~. . ~• '~~~ : ®~,vica~l'~s 's~ ~' ~ ; ~ EXp)tgES ~ 7 ~ : ~ ~-i~-n . . t • i r/ : T. V r zjj,'•.~RC~p.••' ~ .. ~~'% q R Y Qv ~`~ •4~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA h Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 16.C. Subject: Public Hearing on Proposed 2011 Tax Rates County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: ion Hold a Public Hearing on the Proposed 2011 Tax Rates Ordinance Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on tax rates for the tax year 2011. The County Administrator's Proposed FY2012 Financial Plan holds all rates constant with a real estate tax rate of $0.95 in 2011. The real estate tax rate advertised for this public hearing is $0.95. Based on the advertisement, the Board of Supervisors cannot adopt a real estate tax rate higher than $0.95 on April 13th, 2011. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director. Budget and Management ^ No d~ool.ls AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY ON VARIOUS CLASSES OF PROPERTY FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That for the year beginning on the first day of January, 2011, and ending on the thirty-first day of December, 2011, the taxes on property in all the Magisterial Districts of the County of Chesterfield shall be as follows: Sec. 1. Real Property and Mobile Homes. (a) Except as provided in Sec. 1 (b), on tracts of land, lots or improvements thereon and on mobile homes the tax shall be $0.95 on every $100 of assessed value thereof. (b) On tracts of land, lots or improvements thereon and on mobile homes in the Charter Colony Powhite Parkway Transportation District the tax shall be $1.10 on every $100 of assessed value thereof. Sec. 2. Personal Property. (a) On automobiles, trailers, boats, boat trailers, other motor vehicles and on all tangible personal property used or held in connection with any mining, manufacturing or other business, trade, occupation or profession, including furnishings, furniture and appliances in rental units, the tax shall be $3.60 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (b) On aircraft as defined by Section 58.1-3503 and -3506 of the Code of Vir inia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $.50 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (c) On motor vehicles owned or leased by members of volunteer rescue squads, volunteer fire departments, volunteer police chaplains and by auxiliary police officers as provided in Section 9-57, Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, the tax shall be $.96 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (d) On wild or exotic animals as defined by Section 58.1-3506 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $0.01 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (e) On motor vehicles which use clean special fuels as defined in Section 58.1-2101 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $3.24 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. 0425:85619.1 ~ ~~~-~ ~~.~ (f) On motor vehicles, trailers, and semitrailers with a gross vehicle weight of 10,000 pounds or more used to transport property for hire by a motor carrier engaged in interstate commerce, the tax shall be $.96 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. (g) On motor vehicles which are specially equipped to provide transportation for physically handicapped individuals, the tax shall be $.O1 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof. Sec. 3. Public Service Corporation Property. (a) On that portion of real estate and tangible personal property of public service corporations which has been equalized as provided in Section 58.1-2604 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the tax shall be $0.95 on every $100 of the assessed value thereof determined by the State Corporation Commission. (b) The foregoing subsections to the contrary notwithstanding, on automobiles and trucks belonging to such public service corporations the tax shall be $3.60 on every $100 of assessed value thereof. Sec. 4. Machinery and Tools. On machinery and tools used in a manufacturing or mining business the tax shall be $1.00 on every $100 assessed value thereof. ~'~ Q'!.. `~. ~0 0425:85619.1 Public Hearing # 3 - 6:45 p.m. To Establish an Annual Tax Levy on Various Classes of Property for the County of Chesterfield THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PU_BLIC_HE_ARIN_G_TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO _ CONSIDER AN ANNUAL TAX LEVY ON VARIOUS CLASSES OF PROPERTY FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED _ . _ -- IN THAT OR T DER. - ~--- -1 -- . I - -_ _ - -- TAX LEVY _ - -- - Number Name Organization - --- 1 -- Richard Peterson - - I 2 Don Wilms ~I - -- 3 -- - ------- lu~D_(~~M~, - 4 ~ _-- 5 6 ~-~-.~~~zv - - '- - _ -- j - - _ - - - 7 ` 8 9 - - - ------ 10 11 -- - ---- --- --- -- - 12 13 --- _ -- _- _- 14 _- -- - --- 15 -- _ _ -- - - - 16I - -- - - - -- -- 17' . -- -- - -_ - --- 18 -- --19 -_ 21 _ - - ,- --- - -- -. _ --- -- - -- -- - - -- 22 - - ___ _ - --- 23 ---- - --_ 24 25 ______ -- -- - - - 26 - _ 27 -_- - ---- -- - -- - ---- 28' - _ - _ _ --- - --- 29' 30 '~ _ 31 32 - -- 33 - --- ~, ~ ~. r; _ _ _ "_ , ~ m , ,. Your Community Newspaper Since 1995 P"O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • Phone: (8(M) _545-75OU • Fax: (804) 744-3269 • Email: news@chesterfieldobserver.com • Internet www.chesterfieldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors LN:Tax-Rate-Ordinance 3-9,16 1/20P + 1 in. The Observer, Inc. TAIL NOTICE Take notlae that the Board of Supervisors of ChesterfieM County, Vuginia, at an adjourned meeting oa Wednesd9l; March 23, 2011 at 6:45 p.m. in _ the "County Public Meeting Room. at the Chesterfield Administration Building, Route 10 and Lori Road.~.i~ufidd, Yitgipia, will hold a public hearing to consider: An ordinaaceto establish the annual tax levy on varipus classes of property for the County of CZeld, Vtrginia. A copy of the ordinance is oa file in the County Administrator's office, Room 304, 9901 Lori Road, Chesterfield County, Virginia .and may be examined by all interested persa~ns between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m, Monday through Friday. All persons wishing to present their views on this subject are enwuraged to call the Oioe of llss F3esit do tlu Board of Supervbors at (804) ~~I>I-1200 !u be placed on the spaakars list, or may apQty and sign up at 6p m. before thrmeetlng. " 'Fite hearing is held at a public facility de 'gned to be accessible to persons with disabil"tties. A~ persons with questions on the accessibility of the facility or the need for reasonable accommodations should contact Janice Blakley, Clerk to the Board, at 748-1200. Persdos interpreter services for the daf ~st~f ilse Clerk to the Board ~ Lter than Friday, March 18, 2011. " Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER $200.33 This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s): 3/09/2011& 3/16/2011 Sworn to and subscribed before me this r/~ ~ day of 2011. ~~ J e rooms Jr., Notary Public My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission I.D. 7182093 (SEAL) ,•~~,.,~uuurr~p' .~`~'~, G R ~ 0 ~~~'R ~• ,~ • • is ~-, .4,~`~ ~' ~ o EXtIRES°~, :'D I a • ~ m2-z9-12 • • -- '~ S t:711420l3 s r P=CD: V .~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE P.AY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. Legal Airiant CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~, Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 16.D. Subject: Public Hearing on the FY2012 Proposed Community Development Block Grant and the HOME Investment Partnership Annual Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: n Hold a Public Hearing on the FY2012 Proposed Community Development Block Grant and the HOME Investment Partnership Annual Plan Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on the FY2012 Proposed Community Development Block Grant and the HOME Investment Partnership Annual Plan. The FY2012 recommendation for this program totals $2,085,800 which is comprised of $1,361,000 in new CDBG allotments, $520,800 in new HOME Investment Partnership allotments, $28,900 in program income, and $175,100 in Reprogrammed Funding. These allocations are based on the FY2011 grant levels and are contingent upon notification from HUD of an approved grant amount for FY2012. Based on that notification, revised recommendations may be necessary. The County Administrator has incorporated recommendations of the citizen review committee in the proposed budget. The County's Community Development Block Grant and HOME Annual Plan for FY2012 are required to be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by May 16, 2011. The submission must follow a required public hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Budget and Management ^ No # oootls Community Development Block Grant Activi Bensley Elementary Extended Day Program Better Housing Coalition-Chesterfield Senior Services CDBG Administration Chesterfield Avenue Enhancement Project Communities In Schools-At Risk Youth Program Harrowgate Road Sidewalk and Cougar Trail Paved Shoulder Huntington Hills Drainage Improvements Jefferson Davis Association Streetscape Improvement Jefferson Davis Business Incubator-Biz Works Metropolitan Boys & Girls Club-Falling Creek Phoenix Achievers Plus Pro-Active Code Compliance RAMPS Small, Women, and Minority Business Technical Assistance The Healing Place Subtotal CDBG Elder Homes Corp-Housing Rehabilitation CDBG Housing Rehabilitation HOME Administration HOME Down Payment Assistance Southside Development CHDC -CHDO Subtotal HOME TOTAL *County Administrator's recommendations pending receipt of FY2012 HUD grant amount. FY2012 Proposed $12,500 15,000 272,200 100,000 20,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 150,000 19,300 12,500 130,000 20,000 63,500 150,000 $1,565,000 $180,000 125,000 52,080 85,593 78,127 $520,800 $2,085,800 Public Hearing #4 - 6:50 p.m. Community Development Block Grant and Home Annual Financial Plan L--- -- - -- - --- __ ---- - THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEA KAT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE COUNTY'S _ PROPOSED FY2012 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AND HOME ANNUAL FINANCIAL PLAN SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. _ CDBG -- -- Number I~ ame N - g i Or anization _ _ 1 (Joyce Jackson Better Housing Coalition y 2 ~ Brenda Hicks-Massey - ---- Housing Opportunities f~ L - 3'T.K. Somanath -_ - Better Housin Coalition 9 -- - 4''Marla Barrington Better Housing Coalition_ (0 5 Mike McBrien ---- Better Housing Coalition --- - -- 2 6 Deborah Coe Better Housin Coalition 9 _ 7 ' Sterry McGee - 'Jefferson Davis Association - - 8 ~ f ~i ~S'I. f ~_ ~ -'1 ,fY~ m~_!~ 1 ~%e~~V~ -~C.~Ad ~S -- -- - - - 9 5 0 -1't w~ _ P - - --- --- 10 -- - __ - - - - __ 11 ~' - - -- -- 12 -- -- _ - - - 13 -- -- 14, - 15 161 - 17' II I, _ - -_ - - - --- -- - - fi -- -- 19 ---- -- -- 20' - --- ------ - -- -- I 21' 22I 23I - -- - --- - 24 25 26+ 27'~~ 28 ~ ~-- - 29 - - - -- -- - - -- - ~ -- 30 31' - - - - -- - 32 1 _ -- - - - 33' - -- -- - 34I. -~-- - -- - 35 -__ - 36 ---- CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ,~, Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 16.E. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the FY2012-2016 Proposed Capital Improvement Program County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a Public Hearing to Consider the FY2012-2016 Proposed Capital Improvement Program. Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on the County Administrator's Proposed five-year Capital Improvement Program for FY2012- 2016 which totals $462,692,000 for County, Schools and Utility projects as follows: General County Projects School Projects Utility Projects Total $161,629,700 143,624,300 157,438,000 $462,692,000 Attached are copies of the summary schedules for the County, Schools, and Utilities. Additional detail is available in the CIP document. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Budget and Management ^ No oflot~l U O ,.a ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d o F r ~~~~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i O N M~ 0 0 00 O O, O O O O ~!1 O O O vi O O O vi l~ v l ~p ~ ~ O ~ v1 O a\ ~ ~ O O 00 vi N O 00 N O .r i bq O O X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p O O 0 O N ~ p O N ~ 0 0 O O O 6 q GS O O / M V \O In N ~ ~ ~ N 00 ~ 69 69 y9 ~ "'~ O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 O O O p N M O O N 1n ff3 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O O O ~. 00 N ~ 7 ~ N M O~ ~ y~j O O ` Gzr o 0 ~ [~ ~O N p ~ M ~ ~ 69 69 ~ ~ O Q G ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 N 7 ~ 69 O O O O ~ O ~ ~O l~ M 00 N R 6~9 U vi O br4 ~ ~ A A '~ M "'~ O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O w I N O E M O O O O O O 0 p FH ~ ,,~. w M ~O Yl N t~ O~ ~O vl h 00 O O O ~ o '^ O O M o O O an M M N o~ ~ ~ ~, ., ~ ds ~ °' 0 m .r N 0 O O~ C O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O U I 0 ~ O 0 O O O O ~ ~ N l~ O l~ Vl [~ V1 M h ti p ~ C ~ U FT' M M N V1 1(' 0 N ~ ~ M ~ 6 ~9 ~ ~ G m G w ~ ~ O 01 O m iL+ L y U N U .Y a y C. _ w w _ Q ."..~ r V /~'1 L O _° O ~~ a - r~ a i w .s w C ° rs.. o ro w o ~ ~ C7 7 ~ C7 ~ o ~. ~ p o c ~ o ~ ~ U L _ . ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • a i own ~' Ca • ~ C7 c ~ ~ c ' • `~ ~ a ~ a ro ~ C7 c ~ ~ Y o ~ ,~ c~ ~ .v Ca Q N ~j ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ;; L ~ C Q ca w .~ `~ ~ y .Y ~ ^ ~ a ~' ~b~~ a w ~•~~x ~~~~~~~ x ..° ~'~ c o o O ~ •°~ ° Q~ o o~ Q ~~ o ~ N ~ ~ U o w v~ ry v~ e ~ x `~ i~ ~ o o Z o .~ c ~> w w . D ~QO~ C ~ > ¢¢~x .~~oaa~3 H ~¢~ ? s c; ~ H ~ O Lzl ~ ~ u~o~.2z 5~ F ^^VJ~ I~1 FBI V O V ,.a ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ o 0 0 0 0 0 F" N Vl O O O N [~ O O O O O C N l~ O [~ v'~ p1 Vl O vi O O [.r ~"~ M ~O M N ~O l~ O~ N ~ vl Vl N ~ '~ ~ "" M M ^ w col 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O N O O ,y ~n O O oC O O w 69 M N N ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O >y V7 O [~ 00 O O N CI O O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 N O O y, v; o ~ 0 0 69 N N V°,l ~ _MI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O ~D O O O O N V1 O O V1 eh O O O ~ 69 ~O N N O X00 O^O ~ N O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O ~, v, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ N O O N X 0 0 OFfj O O O OI OI ~I ~ O O O OI ~ L ~ ~ a U i ~ O ~^ ~ c C7 cx v: ~ ~ . . . °' ro O U w c o• a ~ x rJ:. c C7 w ? ~ w C7 ~' ~ ~ ` ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ O rx C7 _ on ~ a~ c ~ O. ~ -o c a~ a U p C7 O ~ ~ V ~ w c ~ ~ ~ rx L F~ ~ ~ CC w ~ ^--~ ~ ~ c C •~ a°i ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ^ ~ ~ ~ .a a ca ~ ' C O ~ O V C7 ~ a i .~ . " O ~ = w ~ v ~ ~ N ~ O cd N ~ ] ~ ~ U ~ Q a i id V] ., c O :~ F -1 CL U y ,~ w ~ ~' ~~-' O ¢ c 'n in °' '~ ~ ~ a °' a4 a c _ ~ ° c ° ° ~ d • - Cq ro U a i (~ ~ ~ o x F. ~ ~ w ~ ~ o a°i o = ~ o e`a a i ~ ~ a :° ~ w w w a ~ F ~ ~ F ~ U U .a ~ ~ H ~ x :a O~ ~ R ~ 69 y9 O 69 I~ OI O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ° ° ~ o o o ~ n M 00 O 00 O O N O O V1 00 l~ ^ ^ ~ 69 ~--i . i ~~O~OIM 000 O ONO 0001 69 N ~ O O O O O O 7 O O Q ~' O M l~ ~ O `O .r ^ l~ O~ d9 OVA O O 00 OI 00 00 oD o O d4 O .0 0 0 ,n 'C 0 U v A 4 b n d v O 0.. h U U O G m a. G A ~_ ti A aU 4 d a G m° 0 0 G a ~~ v~ ,~ w ~i b~ raw w ~? (~'~ ~.1 ~. ~3 N~N F~ ^~ 1~1 F~1 V O ,.a ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F" N o o vi ~ o 0 o vi a; ~ o -= o 0 0 0 o vi vi o .; o c~ o ~0 0 0 0 OF N O V1 N M l~ Vl O N 00 N Vl ~-+ O O V1 vl O 00 .-~ V1 00 O N O O O O O •-~ •-• l~ N ~ O N ~--~ l~ M 00 O v1 00 ~ ~--~ N ~/1 O M [~ \O 00 Vl °~ ~° Vl Vl .-. O 6A W ~ COI O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O p p O 69 O O N ~ O O w O O O o O o O O O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ .•r „'i ~ 69 ~I O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O 0 0 0 0 00 O O 00 ~ 0 0 00 O O O O .-. O O O ,y O vi X 0 0 0 0 O O O ~.,~ O N O O~ G~ ~ M ~ O~ N .~_, Vl M O O O~ ~ O ~ .-.. ~ 00 ~ r ~ ,-. .-. ~ ~ 0 Q 0 ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 69 O O O O O O O O O O 69 O O A N O O O O O O O~ O O Ow O O ~ w M O O O O ~~ O O ~ N 00 U N ~ v1 O `O ~ v .-. ~ ~ m •~ w MI O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .r O 69 O 0 0 0 O O O O ~ O O O O O O iN O O O ~ h O O ~ N 00 00 N [~ ~ 00 7 b9 ~ °' w C., n U .--i NI ~ O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. O O O O O ~° 0 0 O O O O ~p O O O O U ~ '~'~ O O~ n n O O O H O O~ t~ O O O ~ N Vl N ~ N V~ O 00 O\ rh 00 M l~ ~ V1 ~ ~ of w bH .-. G m C7 G C1. ~ U c7 ~. co-: ~•: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ri ~ w c°. k. ~ ~ w ~ h c ~ ~ ~ ; c U Cq •~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a ~ c. ~ ~ x ~ ~ °~ U ° o0 0. U ~ ~ ~ ° rx Gp C ' a c ~ E a ~ c`a ~ k ~ ~ ~ Y i `' ca ^ `~' ~ j ~ N ~ C o ° ~ ~ o .L °" °; y 'c a~i aC°i ~ ¢ ° ~ ~ v ~ y a`"i ~ •ca x ,°', Cr. _~ U o ~ o a`i E Q' ~ ~ ~ ° ai a ~ ° o o ~ v ~ aai °' -o ~ x o a~~ x o a c~~~ a°' Q ~' ° c~ a, Q c~~ `~° c~ u d 0,' ~ Q ~ u: ~ o U ~ x U a, ~ c~ -o -o ~ M ~ U ~: ~? ~ U c c a. •~ •~ w e c i 3 = ~ c° °c° .v C7 c E .a ~ ~ ~ ,, U ea ~ .~ " a •y ~ ~ ~ O ~ '> ~ ~ •G. :r ~ .C ~ x x ?E x .~ .D ~ .°C •C ~ +~-' ~ O •~ 7 ~ a~ c' N ~ G W U v U Q w w x~~ a a.. a. a s rx ~~~ vi F ~°~ U w w d •w b ~? °' o„ ~ ~ ~~~~.~~ ~i ~~I ~r ^~ F~1 ~I V O Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ F' N O O vl 0 0 0 l~ N 0 0 ~ O o ~ M ~ o 0 0 0 00 O .-; O ..a N M O 0 0 N ~p O~ 1 Gri ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 609 O C I O O O O O p C ~ ~ ~ O O ~ O ~ 69 O M N 0p ~ h ~ (; N 69 ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 609 O C I O O O O O C G7 O O O O M ~ C C w O~ 69 N Ch O O N Q O ~p ~ N dN9 ~ O 0O ° 00 0 00 °0 00 °0 6°9 ° c N O V1 O O 1~ N C w ~ 0 Oo ° o ono ~ ~ vl N O : h V ^. ~ n 69 _M O 00 00 O O O 00 O O O O O N C O O O O~ O W ~ ~ O Q ~~ O ~ M N f~ N M 69 eh 01 bR .Nr O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 I O O ~ O ~ o° o ~ o o O ~ ~ N 00 M V1 69 ~O W C7 w ~ ~ Q ~ U ,1 a ` °~ v k., w a ~ ~ w i w ~, r C7 : rx c C7 o W G v ~ ~ ~, ° o ~ ~ _ ~ ~ a i s ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ 7 L O L a~ ~ E ~ ,-, 4. 1 ~ y U ~ a ~ ~ W ¢ ~ y C4 ~ O ~ ~ Q~i U O N c 4 ~ ~ ~ O Y E cd o ~ G d O N ~ i. p ~ ~ ~ "~ , ~ c >, ~ i N ~ w ~ [ ~, 8 r n cn E ~ abi a Ca E ~ , !r ! , v~ .~ 0 0 0 '~; U ° ~ ~ O -O 'fl 'O 'b U ~`+ w C ~ ~ U ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ v~ ri F ~ U w F o: F. 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N N ~ O O O O O O~ O O O ~ M ~ 9 .. N 00 ~ .-i 6 ~ 69 bR O O O O O O O O O O N N 1 A O O 0 0 ~ D 1 ° ~ ~ vl ~ Q 1n 00 O~ O~ bH ~ 0 O O O 0 o 0 O 1 11 O O O O p ~ ~ 69 ~ 01 ° O ° ° ° ° o o o o O O O ~p 0 o c ~ O O ~ 69 rn ~ 0 0 0 0 O O O O ° ° o r o o ~ ~ ~ a bH ~..i 4H 0 0 o O O O O O O O p 0 0 o O r O O ~ ~ 3 w 0 a: w o U w '° ~ ~ ~ c ~ «: o w U ~ W ~ O 'p ~ W a`, ~ ~ ~ ~ Q .~ C U 'b ~ G o ¢ a :' CQ ~° c O ~ ~ a ~ ~ o o L S z x x~ F F c O G 0 Q 0 a 0 U a m a °w' V w v O w 0. h U U C m w G A C7 u A v a a a G 0 m 0 00 a O c a O u b G b~ ~~ w ~? IN 1~ 1r''~^^ V1 U O M'O U "~:° °o °o°o°o 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 000 ¢ o F"~ o a~~ (~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 ~ p vl ; O o ~~c ~ 00000 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00 O O O vi ~n O O vl ,-,o.-. ~ ~ ~ DO N ~ O O ~n vi O O O O N N N O N [ vl V7 O l~ o0 N N GL b9 ~ ~ O O O O ~ O~ O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O M O 0 O 0 O O M O O M O O ~ `p ~ h O O O O [~ O O 00 ~D N l~ O O ~n ~n N O ~n ~ ~ N v'i N O O N N v~ O N ~p ~p .--~ ~ ~ .--. ~ N M 69 N M ^ .. ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O ~'" O ~ O ~ N N N O O O O N O 0 0 0 O O O GT , _, . y ' O O v'i vi O O N r 7 ~ ~n 00 vi .-~ V ~p ! ~ V ~ N N N vi ~.. ~... ~ M 6 4 N 69 ~ "'~ O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O p ~ ~ 1n 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O On O O ~ O H ~ p ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 ~ GT O O ~ 0 V1 ~~ O O 0 ` O [~ N ' v 1 r 7 ~ yi ~O N N N 69 M N ^- 0 0 ^ N ~O 7 O N M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O 69 O 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N L ~ L ~ et O~ N O O ~ O ~ N ~ ~ M N N M N , . 69 N O O O O ~ O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 ~ ~ 0 O O O 0 0 0 M O O 0 0 O~ H C O O O O ~O vi O O~ O O v'~ GL ~ M oo t~ '~ N N O [~ ~. O o0 .--. ~ O M ~ M~ 69 N N _h O ~ ~ ti ~ .~ O > ~ O v NN ~ C ~ a[i C ~ =x ~ In ~ ~ ~ N ~ 0. ~, ~ ~ k, C O ~ ~ ~ ..r N b ~ ~ y -~ • ~ O~q .N+ C E C U T ~ ~ ~ rn ~ A ~ «cddd ~'p W V > ~ ~ w ~ y ¢ > x ~ x ' O 0. ~ ~ ~+ N ~ O. ~ E- C ~ v, c y `~ W w ~ ~ ~ > ~ .ty q ~ o ~ ~ .c ~ O ~ w 3 ~ o c ~ ~ ~ ~ o ? ~ ~ •~ ~ a o ~ ~ F~ S • o O ~ ri^~ ~ Ew o c U Qv~U C ~¢ ¢ ¢wv~w."~~H I ~ F ~ c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 V1 ~ N 00 'n 00 ~ O O O O O O N O ~D O O O O O O O~ O O O n O~ O 7 O v1 O 0 1/ 0 l~ O ~ ~p O ~ p~ ~ ~ ^ M ~--~ M ~!1 ~/l ~ M M O N n k+ 69 N9 ~" ~ ~ 69 69 .~r O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O l O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O v~ h G:, h 0~0 ~ O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p p O O H vl O~ v1 O O O y j ~ O ~ N ~ a N ~ V1 ~ ~ v1 O ^ N v'i O~ O O O~ V1 M O O~ b 9 6 19 VN9 69 b9 ~ ...i O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O O O O O O O O w ~ 10 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ O O ~ O V'1 fi vl O ~ ~ N O ~ ^ b9 M O ^ . r M N 6 9 6 A ~ 69 69 7 ..r O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O I O !'J O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ M V1 M Vl O O O N O~ O O ~ h O ~ W O VMj QMi ~ v1 ~ v~ O~ ^ ^ O ~ h O N N (A 6fi M O~ 00 ~ ,-, ~ 69 69 fA ~f ~ O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O l N O O O O O O O O O ~ 'n V V7 R O O O O O vl 0~0 O p V) '~ O .Mr yq O~ 7 N ~!) N ~ M 69 fii ^~ f/9 ,--~ b9 N O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O N O O O O O O O O GTi O v ~ O O ~ ~ O ~ ~ 0 ~ v'~ O ~ O v~ 6 9 ~ V N ~ 6N9 6~9 O O O 69 O O O O O O O O O p O O O O O O O +' ~ p O O O ~ ~ ~ O O O O .` O ~ ^ O M 7 V1 M ~ ~ O r O N M O~ O ~ L N N l ~--~ ~ ^ ~D O M ~--~ a d ~ ' I U ~ ~ ~ °o ~ °o °o o° °o °o ° C7 C7 0 0 0 o Z o o 0 , W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ o E~ c?~?~c?~~ o~~?c~~° a~ ( W w °" w~~ ) ~ „ ~www~wwxxxw ~H F a3 H ~ ~~ ~ p ~ oo ~ ~ ~ ~> ~ ~ ^ N y ° a Q ~ ~ ~ - a . , v ~ ~ ° x ;~ o a a G - ~ v~ 1r N ~ Ln ~ C c ~ ~ ~ ~ C7 Q .ty c ~ W 3 w y ~ ~3 ~ Q:.~~~H g~~ ~ N a o~ ° ' 3 3 v `, • ~• c° `" ~ a 0.. a 3 ~, b~ ti ' Q z Q ,~ 0 ovn .? v~ o 0 0 ~ ~ ~ R o °~' ~ U ~ ~ ~ 3 a s y d ~ a ~ ~ i ~ ~, [- ~ ~ c ~, 3 a o o ~ o o .~ ~ ~ a~ x .a X w w c~ s. g ~ ~ H ,,, p ~ '~ , o k ~ a ~ o is is ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ Uwxxxxx~'~zxz~3 H II II p wx ~ F w ~, F v~ W a ~ ~ W ~ ~ H ~3 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'i O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N 00 M O p N~ 00 0 ~ N M 000 N GTi 69 ~ ~ 69 bl O O O O O p 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O 0 0 0 0 ~ N O O h N ~ .N~-i ~ 69 0 N O rr ,-.., ri 69 69 69 ~I O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O w o 0 0 0 0 0 O ,,; ,,, 0 0 ~n N ~ ~ ~ N ~ N O "'i .-. ~ 69 69 bR b9 ~ O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ N N O O v1 NO N ~ ~ _ yj ~ O ..r ,~ ,~ 69 Yf Yi 69 ~I O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O N O O O W N N O O O O O O ,~. ~ _ ~ N O 6A Yi ...i •-" 6R 69 .Ni O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O ~ C ~ O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O ~ O M O N M N _ x h ~ ri 69 b9 Yi '~ •-• 69 69 C O O O O O O O O 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 ap .~ 00 O O 00 O h h V1 N O r ~C O [~ ~O O O [~ O 769 v~ l~ l~ O O L O M ^ 7 Q O O O U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 O v, O O O O ~ ~ C7 C7 C7 C7 0° goo zzzz~-- 0 0 0 0 w y~',ww~xxW H ~v o ~ a c .~ o ~ o '~, °' H ~, °' ccd Ca °' v o LY, ro a .^ ~ ro w ~ ~ 3 =°' F z 3 ~ W~ 0 3 a w o c ~ ~ w o N a o ~ z U W C," a p C ti Q H wVJ O (A .~ .N f~ ~ U '~ ~ a {Q~r a+ .-1 5 c 3 ~ ~ `e ~ W (.~ ~ :: ~ °' ' d v p a~wxc~~ ¢ H w x O Q~~~,~8 Public Hearing # 5 - 7:00 p.m. To Consider FY2012-2016 Capital Improvement Program THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC_HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FY2012 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT ORDER. T ~--- - ~- Number TName 1~ill Poole 2~ Ken Childers 3 I Mac Deadmore Bob Whitehurst 5 Jack Speers 6 Cindy Taylor _ ~ 7 Miles Whitten Sl 8~anva Jordan _ _9; ~X-t 10 1 12~ 13 1~- -- 1 - 16 17 ', _ 18! 1~ 20 21 2 23 '~, - 24 ~ 25 i 26 i 271 28 29 i 3~ ~ - - 31 32 33 i 34! 35 CIP T Organization j Camp Baker Board (ICF-MR) Camp Baker Board (ICF-MR) -- - ~=CF-MIS - -I _ - --~~Ohq~~~' ~d 1~ ~, S,~ro~ ec~s _ .Midlothian HS Improvements ~~~~~"M ti - __ - _ ~ _ _~ - fi _ - - - _~ _~ L - l - ~ _ _ L - _~ ~_ __ __ ~ - - ~ ~ - _ _ ~_ _. ~ ~_ _ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ~,., Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 16.F. Subject: Public Hearing on FY2012 Proposed Biennial Financial Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Hold a Public Hearing on the FY2012 Proposed Biennial Financial Plan Summary of Information: This date and time has been scheduled to hold a public hearing on the County Administrator's FY2012 Proposed Biennial Financial Plan which totals $1,119,659,500. Preparers Allan M. Carmody Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Director, Budget and Management Your Community Nexapaper Since /995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 23113 • Phone: (804) 545-7500 • Fax: (804) 744-3269 • Email: news@chesterfieldobserver.com • Internet: www.chesterfieldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County-Department of Proposed Budget For the 2 Full Pages $2800.00 Budget & Management Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2012 The Observer, Inc. Publisher of CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER This is to certify that the attached legal notice was published by Chesterfield Observer in the county of Chesterfield, state of Virginia, on the following date(s) 03/16/11. Sworn to ands scribe before me this ~ ~ day of r'i ~ , 2011. ATTACH AD HERE Legal Affiant J es T, Grooms Jr., Notary Pu 'c My commission expires: February 29, 2012 Commission LD. 7182093 (SEAL) ,,,.~o~ M S .•. ~,Q ",,, Q-• L1N GF• ~; ~~p w~0 • •: J ~_ qr ~S •~~~ti V ~•~~ ._. •~.` THIS~IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOL~~~''~~ii~~~~„N Public Hearing #6 - 7:05 p.m. To Consider the Proposed FY2012 Budget THOSE PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FY2012 _ BUDGET SHOULD PRINT THEIR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW. SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THAT RDER. FY2012 Budget _ --- __ _ - - Number Name ', Organization/Address _ ~ 1'Ruth Chappel _ Colonial Heights Regional Food Pantry ~/2 Dale Bradshaw 'iColonial Heights Regional Food Pantry 3 Lou Mazzini Salvation Army - - - -- 4 _ _ 5 Carolyn Thompson Christmas_M_ other W 6 Monica Hughes 7 Tom Kinier LLI -- - - LLI 8'Toni Kumery ( LLI 9 Dr. Ed Garrett CCHASM 10 Greg Beasley Professional Firefighters Assn. Q 11'Amy Prewett MH/MR 12 ---- ~ 13 Donnie Redford -_ -- - MH/MR _ _. _ _ 14'Jason Young _ _ - The Mill House 15''~Tom Stumm The Mill House 3 16'Gloria Stumm j 17 Amy Peterson _ The Mill House - _ - 15 18 Steve DeGaetani --_ - - ~ 19 Jim Wilson O'Jenny Jones Feed More (Meals on Wheels) -- Courtney Lewis-McGrath ~ . 21 Resources for Independent Living _ T 1 ~ 22 ,Walter Tilghman ~ - - -. Resources for Independent Living 23 (Eleanor Fisher - - Resources for Independent Living fi------ -- 24,Sue Robertson ~~ - --- ___ -- - ''Andrea Brown ' a - --- Libraries --_ 26 Margaret Hicks ~, 27' Sharon Austin ~; 8 Mark Spewak d~ 29 Brenda Hicks-Massey - -- _ - - _- _ -- __ - F°~c(~s~~e. P.~~`~~, - a7 30', Victoria Henderson - a ---- ~, Robert Dortch al9 32 ~' Marie O'Kleasky _ _ _ -- _ -- -- __ - -- _.__ - ~q 3 Dorothy Wyatt. --- - - - _ - fi 34 ,Betty Gartner __ - - - -_ _ __ _ 35iAmanda Moody 36 ,Bar Wood Public Hearing #6 - 7:05 p.m. To Consider the Proposed FY2012 Budget 37 Sonia Smith 38'Don Wilms 39 William Buchanan __ Petersburg Symphony Orchestra _..-_ 40Thelma Watson --- ---- - _ _ Senior Connections - 41 ITricia Wolfe Shepherd's Center 42'Jay Winkler Shepherd's Center - --- - -- 43 Freddy Boisseau -- --- 44 /aq ~ --- _ _ - /~ - 45, kw~~ Cctrrv I 1 46 a1~-env __ __- -- -_ _ -- _- - -- - - - -_ 49''. ~~ 3~ -~ ~~ d J ~~ ~~ ~~ ~o a~ o >;~ m N p ~ U ~ H N Q _O O ~ •C - ~ QN ~v ~ ~ _ N U O O p~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ t ` O A•• O ~ N A ~.J .~ L W Y O ~ ~" ~ O ° Q ° C C ~ ~ ~ ° C to O U ` U ~ (~ • + •+ C (C co N ° bn ~ a O N ~~°Q.~ ~o c. o~ U ~ > 0 C ~ ~'~~~ n`A ~~ W O C~ 1` ~ ~~~~o ~ a > ~ '~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ O W ~ N ~ 00 U ~ U ~ ~ c-~ ~ ~, U ~ ~ L U ~ ca O ~ ~ Q' ., O N O ~ U 0 ~ L ~ ~ L T ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 C (p Y ° Q O ~ V Q~ (~ ° Y c N ~ 3 o ~ o ~ m ~ ~ ~ r- 2 U C CC .O O UA N c 0 Q ~ O C ~ ~ ~ ~ Q •O •~ O L tG ~.,, o ~, E o 0 'o Q H ~ _ _ ~ _ O O U b0 0 0~ O N L ~ 3 ~ N~ C flS O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,C .~ U ~ C N N 0 ~ ~ $r' ~ ~ .c C O N ~ ~ ~• O ~ N - ~ ~ ~ > L •O ~ O O ~ U O (UO ~~E -ate Eoa~° oc~c3 c~'~~a~>o ~ ~ a. ca o~c rn o H O cZ O 3 bA 7i 'D OL v'C•N ~ ~~~ U0~ ~ ; T _+ w =>,*' ~ -.N a~~ Q.~ ~ ~,~o > > Qom; ~ > ~ o aXi N+,Y~ N._ A ~ 0+.+ (dam O ~ ~ ~~_+ O O~ ~ O .O N L C N to O ~ ~ +' ~ C ~ a~o~m a;o ~ s~~~~ nAnQ 'N~~~.~'a~ -o y- LJ.! ~ O Q fn •~ N 'O ~ ~ i fC ~ ~ j +~ ~ ~= O ~ U,p 2 O ~ ° c ° ~ ° ~«_ ~ ~° N ~ i Z L a~ 3 ~~ o c c ~ cn o~ nom, v°•- ~c3m¢ ANC°~~s o~' a~ g ~A N ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ V a> ~ c' N i fn = ~ o o Q ~ ~ U~iD ~ ~ ai ~ m a c ~~ Y p G) c0 ~~ o~ ~~ ~ 2 uU >' c ~~~ t O c cn o L ~ ~ = 4- -o O c = .o ~ ~ ,~ m ,, ca o .o ~ m .~ '~ O O ~ ~ ~ O Q. ~ ~ t fn +'' N O ~ ~ (6 L `~ O ~cpp ~ ~ O O ~ O N •ti0 Q O ~ w ~'' ~ L~ O O N 'C O •i= N t V ~~ N O C~ 3~ U ~_'' f0 ~ `-~ s ~ O. U O. c S Ci0 a ~ aO+ 3 ~ ° ~ ~ ~ U 2 C6 3 0 T c O C Q a~ N 0 ~, c 0 c Q 0 0 U N U ca a +.• Y c L ~~~~ Q O Q~ Q< O a m n m m ~< m vNCS°~om~+a~ ~c~3~~ Q~~c ° acc,cn~?.c~m~v~~~,~ ea rn~'c<pa=3 c,°c°~~~n~- i ~~~a~~oNC<nrnNm y ccn cua~o~'+ °~~ccn ~ m gin' x m ° - ~ -t - O ~ m c ~' n ~ ~ ~ O Q Apr ~ N. ~ _-I p°y pq Vii ~• ~' ~ c~~D ~ m q ~ A D O O. p~ ~' ~ n 7 ~ m N m ,..~ ° ~ cn m mac.°c~o~~~cn~ o°«°~,omoo o~~-a a~i ~o m < ~ ~ ~ ~' v ~ ~ oa ~3~ ° ~ 3 rn ~' o ma 3'ama3~~rn rn nia~rn ~ 0<~o00cwi~ o ~oc~°~ ~ m .a °'°~ ~ c°o ~ n ~ a ~ rn ~ n ~ -~ °'; '"' t ., ~< can ° -~, rn h ~ 2 ~ 3 ° vaa Qm w0 ~~ s* ~noi m m ~ ° ~ ~ ~°'~°< w ~ ~~.m-a m m ~ ~ CAD ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ n m "a = <p ~ N Cp m ~ ~ ~ ~ pq m ~ 'C ~m°°~-° m c°n ~m~~ O ~' o~ucirnc~2a. r ~C7~~v ~.°p~oa~ C7 0~•=mom, m o°~,°~,~a~ O <tno3 ~ •tmn ~• ~ tin ,•+ O ~ ° ~ ~' ~ N ~ cD ~ w D N 2 ~ cn °- r °' ~ m ° ~ mma~ ~ ~m oma ~ m o m ~m v m 3 0 ~ ~ m~~~o~. O 3cuc°n~ ~m~ao-°a° o,aa~~oa a~ ~ cn c m oa ~ o ~ ~~ ~ cu ~~ 'D ? ~ ~ c~ r+~•c c ~ ~ v ~ ~`~~m ~ . o ~, m r,~, ~- ~ `< as m o o a °• o~i o ma m ~ 30~ ~ m any m c o ac cn ~ o m ~ r+-a ~ m -~ ~ rn o~m mom ~v°~ cu~~,~•a~ o~~~ m~'~ rna-~- ~ m ~ o ?c~ m °'~,° ° ~m o ° coma ~ ~ ~ m n~ m n.< ~ ~ m ~. m o ~ -a a~ ~ m ~ 3 ~ ° m ~ m c~ . ,.+ °. cn a ~ n ~ o ~ ~ o ~ _ ~ x ~ ~ Q. cn '*: o ~m a-,, mcm +~c~~ ~m° ~*cmi ~° 3 m ~° N•~ vi a~i o ~ ~' a° ~' ~m ~ m ~ o ° ~ 3 ~ cn m ~ ° ~-« ~ m ~ n m O C Cn D 'O O O D Spec ~~e ~ #3v Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Budget Hearing on March 23, 2011 Comments Submitted by Senior Connections, The Capital Area Agency on Aging Mr. Thomas Deadmore, Board of Directors and Thelma Watson, Executive Director Mr. Chairman, other Members of the Board, County Administrator, Deputy County Administrator for Human Services and other Officials: We appreciate the opportunity to comment on our FY 2012 budget request to the County. Senior Connections is a regional agency providing home and community services to older adults, persons with disabilities and caregivers. We appreciate the local matching funds provided each year by Chesterfield County and other localities in Planning District 15. The Agency has received local government funds since 1973. These funds are needed to leverage state and federal funds awarded by the Virginia Department for the Aging based on the population of persons age 60 and over in each locality. The local government funds are matching funds that allow us to qualify for the federal and state funds. We are thankful to the Chesterfield County for providing funds in FY 2011 for essential services that have kept at risk citizens from having to use more costly services such as nursing homes and assisted living. These services also prevent residents from having to use Medicaid and thereby, saving government dollars and empowering seniors to use community options. In return, we will be able to provide more than $500,000.00 in essential services that are more cost effectively than the County can do since we are providing the same services in other localities. Outcomes for those served include improved health, fewer hospital admissions, reduced emergency room visits and the opportunity to remain in their homes and communities, where they prefer to be. Families and caregivers also receive much needed services and supports that enable them to more effectively carry out their caregiving responsibilities without burnout or having to leave their employment. At least 1 in 4 citizens is a caregiver for older relatives or friends. Our services are very valuable to our families and help them to maintain independence. For FY 2012 are requesting funds that will allow us to leverage state and federal funds to continue important and critical services for vulnerable older citizens to include: • Care Coordination, Meals and Transportation • Friendship Cafe Program at Bon Air Presbyterian Church, Ettrick Community Center, New Covenant Presbyterian Church and Rockwood Village • Case Management, Information/Referral and Assistance • Personal Care and Homemaker Support • Emergency help with Home Repairs, Medications, Mortgage and Rent • Counseling for Money Management, Budgeting and Benefits Enrollment • Legal Assistance and help with Wills, Powers of Attorney and Advance Directives • Senior Employment and Volunteer Opportunities • Caregiver Training and Help Finding Resources In closing, thank you for your ongoing support to the older citizens and families of Chesterfield. We appreciate this opportunity and others to represent and serve them. onnections 24 East Cary St., Richmond, VA 23219 Central Office: 804-343-3000 Toll-Free: 1-800-989-2286 Fax: 804-649-2258 www. seniorconnections-va. org Who We Are Senior Connections, The Capital Area Agency on Aging is a private, nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization governed by a Board of Directors. The Agency was established in 1973 as part of a nationwide network of Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs). We provide direct services, information and referral, education and advocacy for seniors, caregivers and families residing in the City of Richmond and the Counties of Charles City, Chesterfield, Goochland, Hanover, Henrico, New Kent and Powhatan. The Agency receives federal funding under the provisions of the Older Americans Act and state funds administered by the Virginia Department for the Aging. Funding is also provided by city and county governments. As a nonprofit organization, Senior Connections accepts donations of items, services, monetary gifts and memorials. Onr Vision "To encourage and empower seniors to improve and maintain their quality of life. " Our Mission "To assist seniors to live with dignity and choices in their homes and communities. " We are dedicated to helping seniors, caregivers and families maintain quality of life and independence. We Resources for serve older adults with Aging Well diverse needs and place special emphasis on those who maybe isolated and physically or economically at-risk. Information about issues and resources is available to everyone. Senior Connections, The Capital Area Agency on Aging serves as a primary source in planning for and making decisions later in life. Our programs and services help identify and locate the most appropriate solutions based on individual needs. /Q~ ', '~ R ,~aei~ ~ } ~ , ~Zt h Home and community-based services provided by Senior Connections, The Capital Area Agency on Aging give seniors the opportunity to live indepen- dently in their homes for as long as feasible and safe to do so. Our programs and services offer assistance with day-to-day needs and other essential support: Adult Day Care Scholarships provided for care and supervision of older persons with disabilities who cannot manage daytime activities alone. Services vary by location and may include assistance with personal care, limited health care, therapeutic activities, meals, and social activities. Aging and Disability Resource Center Provides information and referral, and assistance in finding services for people with disabilities. Support is also provided to caregivers. Care Coordination and Case Management Assists seniors and their families with locating, applying for, and receiving needed community re- sources. Direct assistance may be provided by Senior Connections or by referral to another human service agency. Caregiver Support Services Provides caregivers with information about available resources and assists with gaining access to support- ive services, individual counseling and respite care. Emergency Services and Financial Assistance Financial assistance to seniors experiencing crisis situations with paying for living expenses, such as utility bills or prescriptions, and have nowhere else to turn. Foster Grandparent Program Seniors age 55 and older volunteer as tutors and mentors for children with special needs. Foster Grandparents serve a minimum of 20 hours per week inyouth-oriented organizations. Friendship Cafes Congregate meal sites offering nutritious meals and opportu- nitiesfor socialization, recreation, exercise, health education and screenings for older adults. Locations include community centers and churches. Guardianship Program Advocates for and protects vulnerable at-risk persons who have been legally found unable to manage the basic require- ments of physical health and safety and do not have family or friends willing to or suitable to assist them. Home Delivered Meals Provides meals for home bound seniors who live alone and have significant health conditions or physical or mental impairments that prevent them from preparing their own meals. Helps seniors meet the recommended dietary allow- ancesfor proper nutrition and provides daily interaction with volunteers who deliver the meals. Long-Term Care Ombudsman Investigates and resolves complaints involving nursing homes, assisted living facilities and home care providers. Volunteer Advocates help enhance the quality of life for seniors residing inlong-term care facilities. Medication Assistance Screens and completes applications for reduced cost or free medications offered by pharmaceutical companies. For income eligible seniors age 55 and older and not covered by medication insurance or any other program. Money Management Counseling Provides one-on-one check writing and bill paying services and assist seniors with managing personal finances including protection from exploitation. Volunteer Bill Payers provides support to the program which increases outreach to more seniors in need. Public Information and Education Provides informative group presentations and educational materials on topics of interest to seniors and those who care about their well-being. Volunteers help educate and promote public awareness of Agency programs and services by attending health fairs and other community events. Produces and distributes Mature Life, the Agency's newsletter. Resource Center Equipped with 20 computer stations and Webcast access, the Resource Center provides additional options to support education, training and coordination of resources for the community as well as staff. Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) Provides volunteer opportunities for seniors age 55 and older to use their skills and experiences to fulfill community needs. Senior Employment Services Employment options for seniors age 55 and older interested in updating current skills and/or re-entering the workforce. Senior Medicare Patrol Volunteers provide public presentations to raise awareness of potential Medicare fraud, abuse, reporting errors and how to report these. Short-Term Home Care Personal care, homemaker/companion care and caregiver respite services to seniors on the basis of need. This one-time assistance can be used during a period of recovery or while arrangements are being made for ongoing care. Transportation Coordination Services Transportation provided to participants of the Friendship Cafes. Transportation for medical appointments maybe available for individuals who meet eligibility requirements. Some vehicles are equipped to transport persons with disabilities. Coordinated transportation initiatives are in progress to help meet the needs of additional seniors and their caregivers. Virginia Insurance Counseling and Assistance Program (VICAP) Trained volunteers counsel seniors and others about making informed decisions on Medicare and other insurance includ- ing health, Medigap and long-term care. Volunteer also assist seniors with tracking medical bills and resolving complaints. Volunteer Opportunities Volunteers provide support services to seniors in need. Senior Connections promotes volunteer opportunities for all ages. The Agency especially encourages seniors age 60 and older to volunteer. Other Resources Senior Center, A Community Partnership 4200 Innslake Drive, Suite 101, Glen Allen, VA 23060 (804) 353-3171 Hours: 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday Services include health screenings and promotion, exercise, arts and crafts, educational programs, Pathways Support Program, tours, trips, games and music. www.easyaccess.virginia.LOv Virginia Call Center (Dia12-1-1) Nov 2010 ~~'ec~a(y ~u3S~SPa 4 sPca~w- Tonight I would like to talk to you about my friend Charlie and a problem of his, that I am trying to help him with. Both his mother Ginny and himself are worried about their grandfather's, Nathan, financial situation. The problem is that Nathan monthly income is $1,812, but he is spending $3,182 a month, this leaves him with a short fall of $1,370 a month. The real bad thing is he is putting this short fall on his credit card, and currently has an outstanding balance of $141,115.00. Now Charles and his mother do not really have a financial problem they get enough money each month to cover their bill's, or so it seems. What they do not take into consideration is that part of their grandfather's expenditures each month is money and gifts that he buys them and the rest of his children and grandchildren. Even Charlie's mother does the same thing, giving her children gifts and money, that she could not afford if it was not for what she gets from her father. The fact of the matter is if it was not for the money and gifts that Charlie got from his mother and grandfather, he would be spending more then he actually earns and the same goes for his mother. Mr. Holland, you being a CPA what would you tell this family? Now I have pointed out to both that one way to help Nathan would be to not take money and gifts from him and to live off of what they earn, but they will not accept that solution. They have many excuses, first they say if they did not take the money, other members of the family will take it and some of them are not as responsible as Charlie and his mother. Also they say that without the money they could not keep up the life style they are currently living, and others would look down on them. They also point out that part of deal is that they and the rest of the family have to send money to Nathan to cover the cost of necessary and luxury items, for the whole family, and right now they are getting more back then they send to Nathan. They tell me that even if they did not take the money they would still have to send that money to Charlie's grandfather, and they feel that they are just getting their money back. Now, the reason I told you this fictional story is that the numbers I gave you for Nathan monthly budget are based on the monthly income and expenses of the Federal Government. The only difference is that 8 zero's have been removed from end of the numbers I have used. This does not change the fact that while Chesterfield or Charlie and Ginny or the Commonwealth of Virginia, are showing a balance budget, it is only because the Federal government is sending them money. What is this county going to do when those credit cards are torn up and Nathan can not send us the money and gifts that he current is sending us. Now some will say that this is temporary and that we will grow our way out of it, the problem with that is that we have been in this situation for a long time and nothing is changing. Instead this problem does not get better, it is getting worse and recently it has gotten really bad. Finally I left out own part of the story above, part of what Nathan was getting money for was to setup accounts to cover his families retirement and medical expenses. Right now the money he is getting for those expenses are more then covering the expenses, but the future does not look rosy. This is because Nathan did not setup those accounts, and instead borrowed that money to pay for his debt. Also the family is getting older and the cost of medical care is getting more expensive. Some of those that the family has talked to say that if they do not make changes, Nathan will have to come up with $1,125,570.00 to cover those cost in the future. Just like all the other numbers I have given to you for Nathan, add 8 zero's to get to the number for our country. All I am asking you as you move forward in this budget process and in future budget process, is for you to keep this information in mind. If the amount the Federal Government is spending does not go down, hard choices will have to be made and those choices will effect this State and this County. If we start now making those choices we can put ourselves in a better position to deal with them. Unfortunately I have not seen any desire of the National leadership to deal with these issues directly and I have seen little desire to do so by the State and County leaderships either. In closing I would like to mention a piece of information, Rep,. Paul Ryan was recently quoted as saying "The Congressional Budget Office has this economic model where they measure the economy going forward, and they are now telling us that the entire economy crashes in the year 2037 because their computer simulation can't conceive of any way in which the U.S. economy can continue." Now I have for you the PolitiFact analysis of his comment, and their summary is as follows "Generally, then, Ryan's oversimplifications and exaggerations lead us to downgrade our rating, but his broader point about the perils of the debt for the nation's economy remains accurate. On balance, we rate his statement Half True." Keep in mind when you read this article from them, the main reason they downgraded it is because another model that are based on positive changes that are EXPECTED to be made, failed in 2058 just 21 years after the day Rep Ryan uses. ~.«« a.,~, I rhW nya~„4y~ ..tsv Inotlel oz econoltly sett-aestructs due to... http://www.polititactcoln/troth-o-llleter/statelnellts/2011/Inar/21/pain-r... PditlFad: National PolitlFad States ArtideS Trutll-0-Neter® Promises People Pundits search Po®Faq '. The Truth-0-Nleber Says: "The Congressional Budget Office has this economic model where they measure the economy going forward, and they are now telling us that the entire economy crashes in the year 2037 because their computer simulation can't conceive of any way in which the U.S. economy can continue." Paul Rvan on Friday, March 18th, 2011 in a prNate briefing to Members of Congress Paul Ryan says CBO model of economy self~festructs due to rising deficits in 2037 Recently, House Budget dwirman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., allowed Journalists from CNN ro attend adored-door briefing that he held for fellow Republican lawmakers. One comment Ryan made during his presentation caught our eye. ~,i-~~fa~f Share this story. ."tH"• P.aceminentl 11 16 ADVERTISEMENT About this statement: "The Congressional Budget Office has this economic model where they measure the economy going forward, and they are now telling us that the entire economy sashes in the year 2037 because their computer simulation can't conceive of any way in which the U.S. economy can continue," R~ ~, according to the CNN report, which also inducted a video dip of the comment. We wondered whether Ryan was accurately describing what the CBO -- Congress' non-partisan fiscal-analysis office -- was saying. We found that Ryan has a point about the peril fadng the economy from the nation's rapidly growing debt, but we also found that his comment was somewhat exaggerated. House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan lectures fellow Republican lawmakers about the risks ro the economy from rising debt. We turned to several economists, including liberals and conservatives, to see whether they knew of evidence that might support Ryan's statement. They pointed to several documents that shed light on the claim. One was the CBO's analysis of Ryan's own budget "roadmap," published in early 2010. The report compared Ryan's proposal to a CBO model [hat takes the Current baseline budget numbers and adjusts them to account for a number of policy changes, most of which are expelled to be enacted. This pn be considered an approximation of the status-quo. Analyzing this status-quo model, the CBO wrote that "it is not possible to simulate the effects ... after 2058 because defidts become so large and unsustainable that the model cannot plalate their effects." (The CBO went on to write that, compared to the status-quo option, Ryan's plan did a better job of bringing down the debt and promoting economic output.) Still, the year this economic model essentially blows up, according to CBO, is 2058 -- 21 years later than what Ryan said In the CNN dip. Subsequent estimates, with new data and revised methodologies, produced different -- and more dire - condusions. The C80 pubUShed a dowment called the Long-Term Budget Outlook in June 2010 and then revised it in August 2010. Uke the analysis of Ryan's plan, this study also used multiple models ro analyze the future fiscal and economic picture. Published: Monday, March 21st, 2011 at 12:20 p.m. SubJects: Economy Sources: CNN.COm, "Bghind the SCenes• How the GOP is selling its budget plan to itself," March 18, 2011 Congressional Budget Office, analysis of Paul Ryan's Roadmap for America's future Ad of 2010, ]an. 27, 2010 Congressional Budget Office, "The Lona-Term Budget Outlook" June 2010/revised August 2010 Congressional Budget Office, "Fgderai Debt and the Risk of a Fiscal Crisis. A Series of Issue Summaries from the Congressional Budget Office," July 27, 2010 Congressional Budget Office, revisions to the Long-Term Budget Outlook, Aug. 3, 2011 E-mail interview with Paul Van de Water, senior fellow with the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, March 18, 2011 E-mail interview with Daniel Mitchell, senior fellow at the Cato InstiWte, March 18, 2011 E-mail interview with Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, March 18, 2011 E-mail Interview with J.D. Foster, senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, March I8, 2011 E-mail interview with Marc Goldwein, policy director of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, March 18, 2011 E-mail interview with Conor Sweeney, spokesman for Rep. Paul Ryan, March 19, 2011 Written by: Louis Jacobson Researched by: Louts Jacobson Edited by: Martha Hamilton How to contact us: We want ro hear your suggestions and comments. For tips or comments on our Obameter and our GOP-Pledge-O-Meter promise databases, please e_maU the Obameter. If you are commenting on a of 3 3/23/2011 12:55 PM PolitiFact ~ Paut Ryan says CBO model of economy self-destructs due to... http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statemetrts/2011/Iliar/l Upau~-r... e economic models breaks down if debt were continue to accrue f th spedflc promise, please indude the wording of the es The CBO cautioned that one o indefinitely. 'The economic model used for this comparison LS capable of estimating outwmes only promise. under sustainable government policies," the CBO wrote, referring to polities that rein in the debt For comments about our Truth-O-Meter or rather Man letting it spiral out of control. Flip-O-Meter items, please a-mail the Truth- O-Meter. We're especially Interested In seeing any Under Me August revision, the CBO says this model functions through at least 2035. dwin a-mails you receive that you would like us to d,edt out. If you send us a comment, we'll assume Paul Van de Water, a senior fellow at the liberal Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, said ft's You don't mind us publishing It unless You tell us otherwise. plausible Mat Me model wuld implode as early as Me 2030s, though he added that other models analyzed by the CBO do not predict an implosion that soon. '" : Browse the The Truth-0aVleter So the CBO has used a variety of models to analyze the future state of the economy, grid some o ' ____ _. - ----- -- - -- Barack Obama's file s them suggest serious problems for Me economy within the next few decades. But there f the CBO models spedflcally fail by 2037, as Ryan says, and his h • ^ oe Biden's file er any o uncertainty about whet language -- that Me "entire economy Qashes" -- K probably a bit too apocalyptic given the ^ Pants-On-Flre_ Iru inns i uncertainties of Me modeling. ngs ^ By our rul ^ By subied Our experts added a few other caveats. • By oerson ^ NPR/Po1itlFad Mes~ge Machine The model Ryan is referring to is based on the assumption that no policy changes aro ^ ABC News'This Week" made m reduce the debt. Even Mough lawmakers have typically been loath to touch the main drivers of the nation's debt Sutlscribe• burden -- entitlements such as Sodal Security and Medicare -- some economists said Mat It was lode rather than making changes to im Keep up b0 date with Politifat:t; p unrealistic that pollUdans would simply let the economy stave off that fate. ^ Sian uo for our a-mail (about once a week) 'If you keep going like Mis, you're going to end up the as shouting t " ^ Put a free PolitiFad widget on your bldg or Web , egory This one is same [a Padfic Ocean' to someone headed west from New Jersey," said Dean Baker, a liberal economist. "It page ~ s haribe to our RSS feeds on Truth-O-Meter is absolutely true, but in an absurd way." Items ^ Subsaibe to our RSS feeds on GOP Pledge= Baker said Mat the CBO does long-term budget proJedions that assume that "Congress never does p-Meter Items anything even as the debt increases, bushing up Interest payments, leading to ever-larger defldts. ^ S~b~cribe to our RSS feeds on Obameter it~m~ ... I'm not sure what Ryan Minks that he is showing by this. It Is almost inconceivable Mat we would ^ flow u~ on Twitter ever see anything Ilke this." ^ Fan us on Facebook ^ Shoo the PaliUFad store for T-shirts hats and The models the CBO uses are lust that -- models. other PolitiFad swan Dan Mitchell, a senor fellow at Me libertarian Cato Institute, Bald that he agrees that the economy Is In danger, but not necessarily for Me reasons laid out in the model. He Minks the general burden of government will be more of a defining fader than defldls or debt per se. "The real issue is whether Me CBO model makes sense," Mitchell said. "I don't think it does because it is based largely on deficits and debt being the key determinants of economic performance. ThaYs not true, Mough in extreme cases those factors can be very important. People are right to worry about the long run, even X CBO's methodology is a bit dodgy." So where does Mis leave us? We'll start by listing Me exaggerations in Ryan's statement. First, he implies that Mere's only one CBO model, glossing over the fact Mat the agency uses multiple models Drat have produced varying results. Second, Ryan predicts a collapse in 2037, but there's considerable variation in the doomsday year depending on Me model Me CBO uses and the data tt plugs Into its calwWUOns. Third, Ryan's statement assumes Mat no dwnge will be made from anent polities before a colWpse -- an assumption Uwt's unlikely. And fourth, his daim that the CBO's "computer simulation can't conceive of any way In which Me U.S. economy can continue" strikes us as an overstatement. in fad, the CBO finds lots of unpalatable scenarios if things get bad enough, but Me agency doesn't go so far as to suggest that Me ernnomy will simply cease fundionirg. Economies are far more complex than any single model, 5o Just because a model stops working, it doesn't necessarily mean that Me economy will bring us bade to hunter-gaMerer days when the model stops working. What saves Ryan's comment is that, despite his exaggerations, his general point is valid. The economists we spoke to agreed that Mat the nation's current pant of defldts and debt, If not altered, will become unsustainable. "The issue is simply that under curcent law, the debt-to-GDP ratio soars so high that economic models break down," said ].D. Foster, a senor fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation. "The truM is that nobody really knows what would happen as Me debt-to-GDP ratio pushes through 100 percent on Me way to 200 or 300 percent. The models certainly are not capable of antlcipaUng Me effects. But you don't have to have an economic model to appreciate the clear picture of fiscal Armageddon." Generally, then, Ryan's oversimpliflcatfons and exaggerations lead us to downgrade our rating, but his broader point about the perils of Ure debt for Ills nation's ewnomy remains accurate. On balance, we rate his statement Half True. 3/23/2011 12:55 P 2 of 3 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA I71f Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 16.G. Subject: Public Hearing Regarding the Adoption of a Resolution which Authorizes the Issuance and Sale of General Obligation School Bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority County Administrator: on The Board of Supervisors is requested to adopt the attached resolution which authorizes the issuance and sale of general obligation school bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $17,590,000 for the purpose of providing project funds in the amount of $16,750,000 (the "proceeds requested") for School Capital Projects. Summary of Information: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY2011-FY2015 was approved by the Board of Supervisors and School Board in April 2010 and included a planned sale of $10,700,000 in VPSA bonds for FY2011. The Adopted FY2010 School CIP included $6,050,000 in planned VPSA bond financing. The School Board is requesting the Board of Supervisor's approve their participation in the spring pooled VPSA sale which is to occur in April. The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the issuance of up to $17,590,000 in bonds, five percent higher than what has been appropriated, to accommodate possible pricing structures of the bidders. Doing so will not result in excess project funds, but will allow for adjustments in the Preparers Allan M. Carmody Title: Director of Budget and Management Attachments: ^ Yes ~ No #000130 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2 AGENDA Summary of Information (continued) principal amount of the bonds sold. Bidders at times will price bonds under a discounted structure, which without an allowance to "upsize" the par amount of bonds sold, could result in project funding levels below what has been appropriated for the projects. If the successful bidder's pricing structure reflects a discounted purchase price and no additional bonds have been authorized in excess of the requested amount of $16,750,000, the resulting purchase price will reflect the discount and result in the locality receiving less than the required and appropriated project funding levels. The VPSA requested that each locality authorize an "up to" principal amount of bonds that is sufficiently in excess of the requested project funding levels to provide the desired and appropriated project funding levels in line with the FY2010 and FY2011 School CIP's. Accordingly, in the event the bonds are priced at a discount, the additional appropriation of bond proceeds is necessary - it would not however increase the total appropriation for the projects. The planned uses of the VPSA bonds are consistent with the approved CIP and are listed on the attachments. Also attached is the School Board resolution dated February 22, 2011 requesting that the Board of Supervisors authorize the issuance and sale of the bonds and submission of an application to the VPSA for financing. Prior to the final authorization of this issuance and sale of general obligation bonds to the VPSA, state law requires that the Board of Supervisors hold a public hearing after giving notice in accordance with the provisions of Code of Virginia, 1950, Section 15.2-2606.A. After the public hearing is held, the Board is requested to adopt the attached resolution which authorizes the issuance and sale of general obligation school bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) in one or more installments in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $17,590,000. UUO.1.~~1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ t(j0»Od'MOO 000000000 ~ ~' ~' ~ N ~~ to M 0 0 0 0 ~~ O ti O O to O In In 0~ 1~ X 0 0 0 ~ N N N N~ N O to ~ ~ U - r M A N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + N ~ W ~ 6R L ~ CC G U ~ fC ~ O = ~ O C ~ ~ O C ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 3 uj ~ ~ ~ t6 N ~~ ~ ~ N 0 0 0 °o ~ ~ a~ U C 0 0 0 0 0~ O 0_ t O U ~ E ~ ~ ~ O ~ Uu) U (nL~ o o O ~ (n r V ~ ~+ ~ N ~ ~ (n ~ C O r ~ O~ +' $ "-' N C L 2 v N L ~ c . a~ o °-'w~ w~Wv c~~cvi a v~ o ~ C. v ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ oo ~ 3 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E N c 'v ~ ~~ °- c ~ ~ 3 rn °U o o o o~ ~.o uvi E ~ ~ o ca ~ ~ ~ ~ . m -a . . o . 0 ~L O ~ L Q • ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ O _ V (A O ~ U f0 E 'd ~ d i O ftS Q ~ N O d ~ / ~ ~' / Ii ~ O ~"~ ~ ~ • Q O ~ L Q~ ~ L ~ ~ ` ~+ E . '~ ~ ~ C ~ L C L • ~ _ ~ :~ N ~ ~ c f U N O ~ +r ~ ~ C O ~+ E -p ~ R c Q O ~~ O Q + + O J U _ U ~ o ~ u`°i `~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ LC ~ ~ ^^`` • fA C L O C C L (n ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~~ W W .~ ~ p ~~ N~ ~' V t p ~ a~ n Q F°'-CCU ° ~(~ ~ ~ . Q o a` _ ~ ~~Q~,K~iZ VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Tuesday evening, February 22, 2011, at seven o'clock in the Public Meeting Room at the Chesterfield County Courthouse Complex APPENDIX E to the Bond Sale Agreement RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS FOR SCHOOL PURPOSES AND CONSENTING TO THE ISSUANCE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The School Board of the County of Chesterfield (the "School Board") hereby (i) requests, pursuant to Section 1 ~.2-2640 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended (the "Code"), that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield issue its general obligation school bonds (the "Bonds") in an aggregate principal amount sufficient to provide $16,750,000 proceeds for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes and (ii) consents, pursuant to Section 15.2-2638.B(iii) of the Code and Article VII, Section 10(b) of the Constitution of Virginia, to the issuance of the Bonds. 2. Further, the School Board consents to and authorizes an application to the Virginia Public School Authority (the `'VPSA") for the purchase of the Bonds by the VPSA as part of its 2011 Spring Pooled Bond Sale. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. School Board members present at the meeting were: Diamie Pettitt, Patricia Carpenter, Marshall Trammell, Umarh Rajah, and David Wyman. 't'here were no Board members absent tram the meeting. Members voting in favor of the foregoing resolution were: Dianne Pettitt, Patricia Carpenter, Marshall Trammell, Omarh Rajah, and David Wyman. 'There were no members voting against the foregoing resolution or abstaining from voting. Carol Timpano, Clerk Mar us J. Nei me, Jr.,. uperintendent RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED $17,590,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, SERIES 2011, TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia (the "County"), has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow an amount not to exceed $17,590,000 and to issue its general obligation school bonds for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes; and WHEREAS, the County held a public hearing, duly noticed, on Wednesday, March 23, 2011, on the issuance of the Bonds (as defined below) in accordance with the requirements of Section 15.2-2606, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended (the "Virginia Code"); and WHEREAS, the School Board of the County has, by resolution adopted on Tuesday, February 22, 2011, requested the Board to authorize the issuance of the Bonds (as hereinafter defined) and consented to the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the Bond Sale Agreement (as defined below) shall indicate that $16,750,000 is the amount of proceeds requested (the "Proceeds Requested") from the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") in connection with the sale of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, VPSA's objective is to pay the County a purchase price for the Bonds which, in VPSA's judgment, reflects the Bonds' market value (the "VPSA Purchase Price Objective"), taking into consideration of such factors as the amortization schedule the County has requested for the Bonds relative to the amortization schedules requested by other localities, the purchase price to be received by VPSA for its bonds and other market conditions relating to the sale of the VPSA's bonds; and WHEREAS, such factors may result in the Bonds having a purchase price other than par and consequently (i) the County may have to issue a principal amount of Bonds that is greater than or less than the Proceeds Requested in order to receive an amount of proceeds that is substantially equal to the Proceeds Requested, or (ii) if the maximum authorized principal amount of the Bonds set forth in Section 1 below does not exceed the Proceeds Requested by at least the amount of any discount, the purchase price to be paid to the County, given the VPSA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, will be less than the Proceeds Requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA: 929463.3 035047 IND 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue and sell its general obligation school bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $17,590,000 (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes, including those described in Exhibit B attached hereto. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of VPSA to purchase from the County, and to sell to VPSA, the Bonds at a price, determined by VPSA to be fair and accepted by the Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator, or either of them, that is substantially equal to the Proceeds Requested, except that the Bonds may be sold for a purchase price not lower than 95% of the Proceeds Requested if issuing the Bonds in the maximum principal amount authorized by Section 1 of this Resolution is insufficient, given the VPSA Purchase Price Objective and market conditions, to generate an amount of proceeds substantially equal to the Proceeds Requested. The Chairman of the Board, the County Administrator, or either of them, and such other officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Bond Sale Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2011, with VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to VPSA. The agreement shall be in substantially the form submitted to the Board at this meeting, which form is hereby approved (the "Bond Sale Agreement"). 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 2011 "; shall bear interest from the date of delivery thereof payable semiannually on each January 15 and July 15 beginning January 15, 2012 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), at the rates established in accordance with Section 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on July 15 in the years (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts set forth on Schedule I attached hereto (the "Principal Installments"), subject to the provisions of Section 4 of this Resolution. 4. Interest Rates and Principal Installments. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rates on the Bonds established by VPSA; provided that each interest rate shall be five one-hundredths of one percent (0.05%) over the interest rate to be paid by VPSA for the corresponding principal payment date of the bonds to be issued by VPSA (the "VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further that the true interest cost of the Bonds does not exceed six percent (6.00%) per annum. The Interest Payment Dates and the Principal Installments are subject to change at the request of VPSA. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept changes in the Interest Payment Dates and the Principal Installments at the request of VPSA; provided that the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds shall not exceed the amount authorized by this Resolution. The execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in Section 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence such interest rates established by VPSA and Interest Payment Dates and the Principal Installments requested by VPSA as having been so accepted as authorized by this Resolution. 5. Form of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be initially in the form of a single, temporary typewritten bond substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. ~~~~ •~6 -2- 929463.3 035047 IND 6. Payment; Paving Agent and Bond Registrar. The following provisions shall apply to the Bonds: (a) For as long as VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available funds to VPSA at, or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next succeeding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. (b) All overdue payments of principal and, to the extent permitted by law, interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds. (c) U.S. Bank National Association, Richmond, Virginia, is designated as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds. 7. Prepavment or Redemption. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by VPSA coming due on or before July 15, 2021, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2021, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by VPSA coming due after July 15, 2021, and the definitive bonds for which the Bonds held by VPSA may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2021, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2021, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2021 through July 14, 2022 101 July 15, 2022 through July 14, 2023 100'/2 July 15, 2023 and thereafter 100 Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of VPSA or the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute, with their manual signatures or facsimiles thereof, and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto or imprint a facsimile of the seal of the County thereon. ~~Q:~ ~~~ -3- 929463.3 035047 IND 9. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. 10. Use of Proceeds Certificate and Certificate as to Arbitrage. The Chairman of the Board, the County Administrator and such other officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Certificate as to Arbitrage and a Use of Proceeds Certificate each setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of the County that (i) the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Certificate as to Arbitrage and such Use of Proceeds Certificate and that the County shall comply with the other covenants and representations contained therein and (ii) the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code so that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. 11. State Non-Arbitrage Program; Proceeds Agreement. The Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the County Treasurer to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with the Bonds. The Chairman of the Board, the County Administrator and such officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of the Bonds by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, VPSA, the investment manager and the depository, substantially in the form submitted to the Board at this meeting, which form is hereby approved. 12. Continuing Disclosure Agreement. The Chairman of the Board, the County Administrator and such other officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, as set forth in Appendix F to the Bond Sale Agreement, setting forth the reports and notices to be filed by the County and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and directed to make all filings required by Section 3 of the Bond Sale Agreement should the County be determined by the VPSA to be a MOP (as defined in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement). 0 J~l'l.~'~8 -4- 929463.3 035047 IND 13. Filing of Resolution. The appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 14. Further Actions. The members of the Board and all officers, employees and agents of the County are hereby authorized to take such action as they or any one of them may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 15. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on March 23, 2011, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. Members present at the meeting were: Members absent from the meeting were: Members voting in favor of the foregoing resolution were: Members voting against the foregoing resolution were: Members abstaining from voting on the foregoing resolution were: WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, this day of , 2011. [SEAL] Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia 0~04:la39 -5- 929463.3 035047 IND EXHIBIT A (FORM OF TEMPORARY BOND) NO. TR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BOND, SERIES 2011 The COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to the VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY the principal amount of DOLLARS ($ ), in annual installments in the amounts set forth on Schedule I attached hereto payable on July 15, 2012 and annually on July 15 thereafter to and including July 15, 2031 (each a "Principal Payment Date"), together with interest from the date of this Bond on the unpaid installments, payable semiannually on January 15 and July 15 of each year, commencing on January 15, 2012 (each an "Interest Payment Date"; together with any Principal Payment Date, a "Payment Date"), at the rates per annum set forth on Schedule I attached hereto, subject to prepayment or redemption as hereinafter provided. Both principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. For as long as the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond, U.S. Bank National Association, Richmond, Virginia, as bond registrar (the "Bond Registrar"), shall make all payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond, without the presentation or surrender hereof, to the Virginia Public School Authority, in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. If a Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption is not a business day for banks in the Commonwealth of Virginia or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then the payment of principal, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be made in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next succeeding the scheduled Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. Upon receipt by the registered owner of this Bond of such payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest, written acknowledgment of the receipt thereof shall be given promptly to the Bond Registrar, and the County shall be fully discharged of its obligation on this Bond to the extent of the payment so made. Upon final payment, this Bond shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar for cancellation. The full faith and credit of the County are irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and the premium, if any, and interest on this Bond. The resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors authorizing the issuance of the Bonds provides, and Section 15.2-2624, 929463.3 035047 IND Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, requires, that there shall be levied and collected an annual tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond as the same shall become due which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and shall be in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. This Bond is duly authorized and issued in compliance with and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the Public Finance Act of 1991, Chapter 26, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County and the School Board of the County to provide funds for capital projects for school purposes. This Bond may be exchanged without cost, on twenty (20) days written notice from the Virginia Public School Authority, at the office of the Bond Registrar on one or more occasions for one or more temporary bonds or definitive bonds in marketable form and, in any case, in fully registered form, in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof, and having an equal aggregate principal amount, having principal installments or maturities and bearing interest at rates corresponding to the maturities of and the interest rates on the installments of principal of this Bond then unpaid. This Bond is registered in the name of the Virginia Public School Authority on the books of the County kept by the Bond Registrar, and the transfer of this Bond may be effected by the registered owner of this Bond only upon due execution of an assignment by such registered owner. Upon receipt of such assignment and the surrender of this Bond, the Bond Registrar shall exchange this Bond for definitive Bonds as hereinabove provided, such definitive Bonds to be registered on such registration books in the name of the assignee or assignees named in such assignment. The principal installments of this Bond coming due on or before July 15, 2021 and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2021, are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The principal installments of this Bond coming due after July 15, 2021, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2021, are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2021, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2021 through July 14, 2022 101 July 15, 2022 through July 14, 2023 100'/2 July 15, 2023 and thereafter 100 Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without the prior written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond (1~'a~l'~ ~4'~_ A-2 929463.3 035047 IND Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed in due time, form and manner as so required, and this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield has caused this Bond to be issued in the name of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, to be signed by its Chairman or Vice Chairman, with his manual signature or a facsimile thereof, its seal to be affixed hereto or a facsimile thereof imprinted thereon, and attested by the manual signature of its Clerk or any of its Deputy Clerks or a facsimile thereof, and this Bond to be dated . 2011. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA (SEAL) ATTEST: Clerk, Board of Chairman, Board of Supervisors of the County of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia Chesterfield, Virginia CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is delivered pursuant to the within-mentioned proceedings. Date of Authentication: May _, 2011 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent By: Authorized Officer OU~'l.42 A-3 929463.3 035047 IND ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto (Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code, of Assignee) PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE the within Bond and irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to exchange said Bond for definitive bonds in lieu of which this Bond is issued and to register the transfer of such definitive bonds on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Date: Signature Guaranteed: (NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar which requirements will include Membership or participation in STAMP or such other "signature guarantee program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Registered Owner (NOTICE: The signature above must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or change.) ~~~~.~~ A-4 929463.3 035047 IND SCHEDULEI Principal Payment Date (Jul~15) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Principal Installment $ 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 837,500 $16,750,000 Interest Rate ~Q~~,~~ A-1 929463.3 035047 IND EXHIBIT B Virginia Public School Authority -Spring 2011 Long and Intermediate-Term Financing Application Project HVAC Design and Construction Major Mechanical System Repairs Plumbing Roof replacement Painting Asbestos and lead paint abatement Telephone and intercom replacement Gym floor replacement Carpet and flooring Locker and bleacher replacement Lighting retrofits Grounds improvements Total requested financing Facility Estimated Cost Thomas Dale High School $ 55,000 Reams Elementary School 749,000 Robious Elementary School 754,000 Manchester Middle School 1,030,000 Watkins Elementary school 794,000 Midlothian Middle School 3,693,000 Bellwood Elementary School 1,000,000 Fulghum Center 2,500,000 Harrowgate TDHS, Community and Monacan 500,000 old CHHS, Manchester MS, Davis and Curtis 1,250,000 various 250,000 various 200,000 various 250,000 Robious, Providence, Salem MS, Davis, Hening, Weaver 475,000 various 250,000 various 1,000,000 19 schools 500,000 Community, Harrowgate, Crenshaw, Matoaca MS 1,500,000 (?~~."!,~! 5 B-1 929463.3 035047 IND f ,; ~•- ~ x t~~r ~ r~ r _ _ y _„t • _ y • Yom• Community Newspaper Since 1995 P.O. Box 1616, Midlothian, Virginia 231 l3 • Phone: (804) 545-75(10 • Fax: (804) 744-3269 • Email: news@chesterfieldobserveccom • Internet: www.chesterfieldobserver.com ADVERTISING AFFIDAVIT Client Description Ad Size Cost (per issue) Chesterfield County LN:Public-Hearing 3-9, 16 1/lOP - .3 in. $242.41 Board of Supervisors The Observer, Inc. x~~~~~~;c Publisher of wi be ltd put"s{net to Section 15~ d file Colt of Virgkua, 19so, by'the Board of supm~sors (the CHESTERFIELD OBSERVER Board of rs") of the County of Chesterfiel Vnginia (the °County°), on Wednesday, March 23, 2011, at 7:1o This is to certi that the attached le al notice was ublished b P.M., local tins, in the County Public fy g p }' Meetutg Room at the Lane B. Ramsey Chesterfield Observer in the count of Chesterfield state of Vir mix on Administration Building, 9901 Lori Road, 3' ~ g ~ at the Intersection of Route 10 and Lori the following date(s): 3/09/2011& 3/16/2011 Road, Chesterfield, V' a 23832, with respect to the proposed adoption by the Boazd of Supervisors of a resolution to authorize the County to contract a debt / and issue its General Obligation school Sworn to and subscribed before me this l ~ da of Bonds in the principal amount of not y to exceed S17,590,000 for the purpose of 5nancing the costs of .various capital ~/~ school improvement projects of and for the (/ y 1 ~ f~ , 201 1. Them tubers of tbe public. aze invited to attend the public hearing and to appeaz and present their views on the proposed resolution. ThefulIteatoftheproposedresohrtionison ' file in the once of the Clerkof the Boazd of Supervisors of the County,Rooad3o4,Lane Le al Afflant J s T, Grooms Jr., Notary Public B. Ramsey Administration Building, 9901 g Lori Road, Chesterfield, V' a 23832, and may be examined by allmterested persons between the hours of 8:30 A.M.. and 5:00 P.M., local time, Monday through Friday. If further information is desired, My commission expires: February 29, 2012 please contact David Myers, Assistant Commission I.D. 7182093 Superintendent, Business and Finance, for the Chesterfield County Public Schools, at (SEAL) (804)748-1729. The public hearing will be held at a public ~~~`""r~~rrr~r~rc'c~.' facility designated to be accessible to ~ .~•~ ~ R Q Q '~~, persons with disabilities. A~ persons ~•?• ~ • , •• ••,• ~/ ''~~ with questions on accessibility of the ~ ~ ~ •H,W ~ A(l • ~~ I ~• public facility or need for reasonable ~ ~:•<~~ 'f' _ accommodation should wntact Janice B. - ~:o~ EXPIRES Q, ~~" Blakley, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, ~ :4 ; ~ ~-~9-12 ; ~ :: at (804) 748-12Q0. ~ Fttaanc needing . "~ ~ s71S2Q~ in terrines far theierf mart notify ' : . t the r~lerlt of the >iohtd of ors no ~i'~ •'•~~I~ C 1~~~ • ~~ later than ~riday,l~ 18, 2011. ~ ~i ~p ••.....•• ~~ ~~~• i ~''%,~~~RY1,Q+v ~.~~'~ THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 -- AGENDA 1'p9 Meeting Date: March 23, 2011 Item Number: 18. Subject: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Comments• County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Motion of adjournment and notice of the Board of Supervisors meeting to be held on April 13, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room_ Preparers Janice Blaklev Attachments: ^ Yes Title: Clerk to the Board ^ No # O~0(1?1.46