Loading...
11RW0208 CASE MANAGER: Scott Flanigan May25, 2011BS STAFF’S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 11RW0208 Reeds Landing Lot 88 –William Stinson MidlothianMagisterial District West line of Aberdeen Landing Lane REQUEST:An exception to the requirements of Section 19-232of the Zoning Ordinance as it relates to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act(CBPA)to allow encroachment into the Resource ProtectionArea (RPA). RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval with the two(2) conditionsbelow for the following reasons: A.AWater Quality Impact Assessment (WQIA) hasbeen approved. B.The six (6) findings, as required by Section 19-235 (b)(1) have been satisfied. C.Theproposed development isconsistent with the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act. CONDITIONS 1.The mitigation measures outlined in the documenttitled Reeds Landing Lot 88 - Water Quality Impact Assessment,prepared by Balzer & Associates,Inc. and received inPlanning Department April 7, 2011shall beincorporated and implemented during the plan review process.(EE) 2.The Department of Environmental Engineering may approve alternative mitigation measures if it is determinedthat such alternatives will not increase impacts to the RPA or downstream water bodies.(EE) (NOTE: Approval of this exception is for encroachment into the RPA buffer only and does not guarantee development of the site as explicitly proposed in the WQIA referenced in Condition 1 above. Development of the site is subject to all ordinance requirements, review processes, and/or otherrequirements currently adopted at the time ofdevelopment.) Ю±ª·¼·²¹ ¿ Ú×ÎÍÌ ÝØÑ×ÝÛ ½±³³«²·¬§ ¬¸®±«¹¸ »¨½»´´»²½» ·² °«¾´·½ ­»®ª·½» GENERAL INFORMATION Location: Reeds Landing,Lot 88, 11861 Aberdeen Landing Lane, which is within the Spring Creek tributary part of the James River drainage basin.Tax ID739-723-Part of 0493. Existing Zoning: R-40 Size: 1.57acres Existing Land Use: The parcel is located within the Reeds Landing Subdivision having an existing single- family home,turf grass and wooded areas. Condition of Resource Protection Area: The RPA on the subject site is located adjacent to wetlands associated with Spring Creek. The character of the RPA buffer on the propertyconsists of areascontaining relativity undisturbed forested buffer, wetlands,managed turf,single-family homeand portions of the driveway. Area of Proposed RPA Encroachment: The area of the encroachment for this proposed development pertains to only those areas having pre-existing turf conditions.The area of impervious impact will be approximately 2400square feet or 0.055acresof RPA. REQUEST The applicanthas requested an exception forpotential impacts to lands within designated Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas (CBPAs) and downstream water bodies(Exhibit A).The applicant asserts that implementation of the limits of CBPAs, which includeResource Protection Areas (RPAs)and in this caseconnected and contiguous wetlands and vegetative buffer associated with the Spring Creek tributary,would preclude the use of the existing managed turf yard area adjacent to the residential structure for construction and installation of an in-ground pool and reduce the marketabilityof the home.The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act(CBPA) requirements of the Zoning Ordinance specify that a RPAbuffer be established adjacent to perennial water bodies, to include connected and contiguous wetlands, and consist of an undisturbed 100 foot natural vegetative buffer area.In order to meet the desires of potential homebuyers, the applicant wishes to modify the existing use,an open yard,by installing an in- ground pool for recreational use.When the lot was recorded, February 13, 1989 the pool would have been permitted in the proposed location. After local adoption of the Chesapeake Bay î 11RW0208-MAY25-BOS-RPT Preservation Act (CBPA) in October 1989 the applicant must receive exception from the Board of Supervisors for installation of the pool in the proposed location. (Exhibit A) ANALYSIS To approve a Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act(CBPA)exception request, the Board of Supervisors must determine thatthe proposed development satisfies the six (6) findings, outlined below, as required by Section 19-235 (b)(1). The applicant addressed these findings as part of the application process.The applicant’s position can be found on Attachment A.The first criteria for granting such an exception is: 1.The requested exception is the minimum necessary to afford relief. In order to provide continuity with existing improvements and meet required development constraints the area selected for the encroachment provided the least disturbance of the existing vegetation and still meets the project goals. The proposed encroachment is within thearea of the parcel containing existing uses, namely maintained turf grasses. This open area is bordered by wooded areas, wetlands,the existing single- family homeand associated septic system and drainfield.The proposed pool dimensions areforty (40)feet by twenty (20)feet by five (5)feet, which issimilarto that of other pools locatedwithin the neighborhood. The applicant proposes construction of a retaining wall which will further reduce the need for any additional encroachmentsinto the buffer area. 2.Granting the exception shall not confer any special privileges upon the applicant that are denied by this division to other property owners who are subject to its provisions and who are similarly situated. The existing encroachments,consisting of turf grasses,asingle-family homeand portions of the driveway, allpart of the current improvementsoccurred prior to local CBPA requirements.Encroachments to the RPA within a pre-bay lot may be approved through an administrative process provided the request for encroachment pertains only to the first fifty (50)feet orlandward fifty (50)feet of the RPA.In this request,the encroachment will occur withinseaward fifty (50)feet of the RPAtherefore requiring approval of this encroachment from the Board of Supervisors. The encroachment into the seaward fifty (50)feet of the RPA is a result of site constraints(i.e. size of the lot, position of existing structures, topographical features),and the applicant’s desire to allow for improvements similar to that of other homes located in this neighborhood. 3.The exception request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this division and will not result in a substantial detriment to water quality. Construction of the proposed in-ground pool isto be built within the constraints of the existingmanaged turf grassareasandtherefore,will reducethe need for clearing and grubbing as part of the land disturbanceprocess.The areaof impervious cover increase within the RPA is approximately 2400square feet.The proposed in-ground poolwill í 11RW0208-MAY25-BOS-RPT replace some of the existing managed turf grasses.The result will be a reduction in pollutantswithin the stormwater runoff over thatof the present conditions. 4.The exception request is not based upon conditions or circumstances that are self- created or self-imposed. The existing improvements and uses wereestablished prior to the local requirements of the CBPA. As a result, most improvements on this lot are presently in the now existing RPA.As a result, available areas for anyimprovements to the rear of the existing structure are constrained bytheRPA. 5.Reasonable and appropriate conditions are imposed, as warranted, that will ensure that the permitted activity will not cause a degradation of water quality. The applicant will employ erosion and sediment control standards during the construction process.Pool maintenance and care will be conducted with respect to protection of the remaining environmental resources. Proper best management practices will be employed to ensure treatmentand proper disposal of water discharged as a result of pool maintenance activities. 6.The request is being made because of the particular physical surroundings, use, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved or property adjacent to or within 100 feet of the subject property, or a particular hardship to the owner will occur, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of this division is carried out. The existing lot configuration, structure, usesand environmental features has resulted in a limited area in whichto construct improvements.Therefore,any proposed improvement would most likely result in an encroachment within the RPA. The proposed encroachment is a result of requests from potential home buyers wishing to purchase the property contingent on the ability to install an in-groundpool. CONCLUSION The applicanthas requested an exception for potential impacts to lands within designated Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas (CBPAs)asshown on Exhibit A.Implementation of the limits of CBPAs, which include Resource Protection Areas (RPAs),results in the inability for the applicant to use this area as desired.The proposed encroachment into the 100 foot buffer would permit the impacts within the areaof existing encroachments.As mitigation for the encroachmentthe applicant proposes erosion and sediment control measures above that which is currently requiredby Chapter 8 of the Erosion and Sediment Control ordinanceand preservation of the remainingvegetation.The applicant will employproper best managementpractices to ensure adequate treatment and proper disposal of water discharged as a result of pool maintenance activities. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the applicant’s requestsubject to the two (2) conditionsincluded in this report. ì 11RW0208-MAY25-BOS-RPT ATTACHMENT-A Applicant’s response to the six (6) findings as required by Section 19-235 (b)(1). REQUEST FOR AN EXCEPTION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE William Stinson Reeds Landing Lot 88 11861 Aberdeen Landing Lane Midlothian, Virginia 23113 Tax ID 739-723-Part of 0493 1) The requested exception is the minimum necessary to afford relief: There is one encroachment area onsite that will equal no more than 2,400 ft² for the installation of a Gunite (concrete) in-ground pool. The dimensions of the pool are 40’ x 20’ x 5’ (average) with an approximate back flush of 50 gallons. Additional square footage requested will include grading and a retaining wall required for pool construction. The proposed encroachment area is currently a manicured lawn behind the house. Only two trees exist within this area (see attached pictures). 2) Granting the exception will not confer upon the applicant any special privileges that are denied to other property owners who are similarly situated: The encroachmentrequest is associated with a nonconforming lot, recorded on February 13, 1989, prior to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance. Erosion and sediment control measures will be addressed via the building permit that is required for the construction of the pool from Chesterfield County. These permits will require erosion control and will be monitored by a county inspector. 3) The exception request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation requirements of the Zoning Ordinance: Installation of the pool will result in a net reduction of pollutants to surrounding natural resources because of the land exchange from fertilized grass to contained structure with site specific dry-well outfall. Only two trees will be removed as a result of the encroachment. All woody vegetation outside of the encroachment area will remain intact. No filling of wetlands will occur as a result of the encroachment. All wetlands and streams onsite will remain in their natural state. An in-ground dry-wellwill be installed to manage typical maintenance back flush activities. The dimensions of the well are shown on the attached diagram. The well is specifically sized to manage a 50-gallon back flush. The well will have a filter fabric lining and stone fill.It ë 11RW0208-MAY25-BOS-RPT will be positioned at least 2’ above water table and will be located adjacent to the pool (see attached layout). Directions for the installation of a “seepage pit” to manage back flush activities were obtained via guidance for Disposal of Chlorinated Water from Swimming Pools and Hot Tubs (City of Medford, Oregon). Typically, back flush should bedischarged into sanitary sewer; however, a seepage pit is acceptable where sanitary is not readily available (see attached). Municipal sanitary sewer is not available to this lot. 4) The proposed exception is not based upon conditions or circumstances that are self- created or self-imposed: The encroachment request is associated with a nonconforming lot, recorded on February 13, 1989, prior to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance. 5) Reasonable and appropriate conditions have been imposed that will prevent the allowed activity from causing a degradation of water quality: Compensation will include homeowner education regarding the maintenance, draining, and care of the pool with respect to the surrounding environmental resources, including: De-chlorinate the water by allowing it to stand untreated for at leastseven days. Ensure that the pH of the pool water is close to the pH of thereceiving stream (typically 7, but should be tested). Remove excess sediment and leaves from the water Discharge the water so that it does not enter a storm drain or streamdirectly Discharge the water over a grassy area to slow it down and aerate it. Discharge the water at a slow rate to avoid erosion. [Guidance from Fairfax County: www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes/stormwater/pooldischarge.htm] An in-ground dry-well will be installed to manage typical maintenance back flush activities. The dimensions of the well are shown on the attached diagram. The well is specifically sized to manage a 50-gallon back flush. The well will have a filter fabric lining and stone fill. It will be positioned at least 2’ above water table and will be located adjacent to the pool (see attached layout). Erosion and sediment control measures will be addressed via the building permit that is required for the construction of a pool in Chesterfield County. The permit will require erosion control and will be monitored by a county inspector. Please see attached guidance ê 11RW0208-MAY25-BOS-RPT memo from Chesterfield County for: Swimming Pool Contractors, Installers, and Homeowners Installing a Residential Swimming Pool. 6) The request is being made because of the particular physical surroundings, use, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved or property adjacent to or within 100 feet of the subject property, or a particular hardship to the owner will occur, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of this division is carried out. The owner is currently in the process of selling the lot. Two potential purchasers have confirmed that in order for them to purchase the lot, they would like the option to install a pool. The homeowner has chosen to submit an encroachment request in order to sell the property. The property is currently assessed at $902,100. Without the request, the homeowner will be faced with financial hardship. é 11RW0208-MAY25-BOS-RPT