Loading...
85S078July 24, 1985 BS REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 85S078 Raymond E. Spain, Jr. Matoaca Magisterial District North line of Light Street REQUEST: (Amended) Conditional Use to permit a two-family dwelling in a Community Business (B-2) District. A one-story duplex is planned. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval for the following reasons: The proposed use provides an adequate buffer and transition from the commercial property along Chesterfield Avenue to the single family residential to the west. Through the Conditional Use process, the Commission and Board can impose conditions that will insure that development is compatible with other land uses in the area. CONDITIONS The following conditions notwithstanding,-the plan titled "Staff Proposal" shall be considered the plan of development. (P) (Note: The building must be shifted to meet the B-2 setbacks.) 2. A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for each unit. Each space shall be a minimum of 200 square feet. (P) No outside storage shall be permitted. (P) The foundation of the proposed structure shall be brick veneered. An ornamental masonry wall, solid board fence or dense evergreen planting, at least five (5) feet high shall be installed along the side and rear property lines. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted in conjunction with site plan submittal. (P) Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the perimeter of all driveway and parking areas. (P&EE) Entranceways into the proposed structure shall be redesigned to provide an "A" pitched roof over each stoop. (P) A three (3) foot concrete sidewalk shall be installed connecting the parking spaces to the entrance of each unit. (P) A separate six (6) inch sewer lateral shall be provided to each unit of the duplex. (U) 10. The proposed structure shall be used for residential purposes only and shall only be rented to persons fifty (50) years of age or older. (P&CPC) GENERAL INFOR}~TION Location: North line of Light Street, approximately 90 feet west of Chesterfield Avenue. Tax Map 182-14 (1) Parcel 72 (Sheet 53). Existing Zoning: B-2 Size: 0.19 acres Existing Land Use: ~d~acent Zoning & Land Use: Utilities: Vacant North - B-l; Ettrick Methodist Church South - R-7; Single family residential East - B-2; Electrical contractor's office and shop West - R-7; Single family residential 6 inch public water line located on site. Use of public water intended. Environmental Engineering: Lies in Appomattox River sewage drainage area. Trunk sewer located on site. Use of public sewer intended. 6 inch sewer later- als must be extended to each unit of the duplex. (Condition 9) The lot is a wide, shallow swale flowing from the north toward Light Street. Some of the runoff from the church parking lot, located on adjacent lot to the north, appears to run through this lot. The lot should be filled and graded to a point where the building site will be higher than the adjacent ground. In conjunction with site plan review, a detailed grading plan must be submitted to Environmental Engi- neering for approval. 85~ B/BSJUN5/JULY24T Some additional berming could be installed on' the rear of the church parking lot to cause all drainage from the parking lot to be redirected to Chesterfield Avenua. Schools: Lies in Ettrick Elementary School atten- dance zone: capacity - 348, enrollment - 491; Matoaca Middle School zone: capacity - 900, enrollment 583; and Matoaca High School zone: capacity - 1,000, enrollment - 671. Fire Service: General Plan: Transportation: Ettrick Fire Station, Company #12. present, fire service capability good. At Commercial This development will no~ significantly impact traffic in the area. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use to permit a two-family dwelling in a Community Business (B-2) District. The proposed use will provide a transitional use from the commercial property to the east and the residential property to the west. In order to alleviate possible traffic flow problems on the site, parking spaces should be redesigned to face perpendicular to the proposed struc- ture. This will necessitate a redesign of the parking area, as shown in the Staff Master Plan (Condition 1). This redesign will allow vehicles to pull directly into each space. Staff feels that some spaces on the applicant's plan cannot be entered in one movement. A minimum of two on-site parking spaces must be provided for each unit. (Condition 2) Concrete curb and gutter must be installed around the perimeter of all driveway and parking areas to contain the gravel parking lot surface and to prevent vehicles from parking on the lawn (Condition 6). A three (3) foot wide concrete sidewalk is recommended along the full length of the parking lot. This will provide a stable surface for pedestrian access to the structure. (Condition 8) Staff anticipates that this request will set the tone for future develop- ment in this area. Consequently, Staff has recommended several condi- tions dealing with aesthetics. In order to discourage unattractive storage of personal property, Staff recommends that no outside storage be permitted (Condition 3). This should help to alleviate any unsightly conditions for adjacent properties. Staff proposes that the entranceways into the proposed structure should be redesigned to provide a roof over each stoop. The design and dimen~ sions will be illustrated on the revised floor plan and submitted with the building permit application. With the addition of these roofs, the 3 85S078/BSJUN5/JULY24T building will take on an appearance more compatible with surrounding development. For similar reasons, the foundation of the proposed struc- ture should be brick veneered (Conditions 4 and 7). This will set the tone for future uses in the area. To buffer this development from existing development, an ornamental masonry wall, solid board fence, or dense evergreen planting, at least five feet high, should be installed and maintained along the side and rear property lines. A detailed landscaping plan must be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. (Condition 5) CASE HISTORY Staff (6/25/85): In reviewing the details of this project, Staff noted that the property is 50 feet wide and contains 8,235 square feet, whereas the requested R-9 zoning requires a 75 foot width and 9,000 square feet. To resolve this problem, the developer withdrew the request for rezoning and sought the Conditional Use for a duplex in a B-2 zoning district. It should be noted there are different setbacks between B-2 and R-9 zoning. B-2 requires a side yard of 20 feet adjacent to residential districts and rear and front yards of 30 feet. Planning Commission Meeting (6/25/85): On motion of Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. O'Connor, the Commission recom- mended approval of this request subject to the conditions on pages 1 and 2. AYES: Unanimous. The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, July 24, 1985, beginning at 2:00 p.m., will take under consideration this request. 85£ 3/BSJUN5/JULY24T I¥ VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY ORANGE HILL '>RANGE 8~ C.U. SH. 53 [AMENDED) LIGH'T TO CHESTERFIELD S-FR~ET 85 SO 7E~- / RAYMOND E. SPAIN,JR. representative STAFF'S PROPOSAL /Gl-IT' ~0