2011-09-21 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINUTES
September 21, 2011
Supervisors in Attendance: Staff in Attendance:
Mr. Arthur S. Warren, Chairman Mr. Mike Bacile, Dir.,.
Ms. Dorothy A. Jaeckle, Vice Chrm. Purchasing
Mr. James M. Holland Dr. Sheryl Bailey, Dep.
Ms. Marleen K. Durfee County Administrator,
Mr. Daniel A. Gecker Management Services
Ms. Janice Blakley,
Mr. James J. L. Stegmaier Clerk to the Board
County Administrator Ms. Patsy Brown, Dir.,
Accounting
Mr. Kevin Bruny, Chief
Learning Officer
Ms. Debbie Burcham,
Exec. Dir., Community
Services Board
Mr. Allan Carmody, Dir.,
Budget and Management
Ms. Jana Carter, Dir.,
Juvenile Services
Mr. Barry Condrey, Chief
Information Officer
Mr. Roy Covington, Dir.,
Utilities
Ms. Mary Ann Curtin, Dir.,
Intergovtl. Relations
Mr. Jonathan Davis, Dir.,
Real Estate Assessments
Mr. Will Davis, Dir.,
Economic Development
Mr. William Dupler, Dep.
County Administrator,
Community Development
Colonel Thierry Dupuis,
Police Department
Mr. Robert Eanes, Asst. to
the County Administrator
Mr. Michael Golden, Dir.,
Parks and Recreation
Mr. John W. Harmon,
Real Property Manager
Mr. Thomas E. Jacobson,
Dir., Revitalization
Mr. Donald Kappel, Dir.,
Public Affairs
Major Dan Kelly,
Police Department
Mr. Rob Key, Director,
General Services
Mr. Louis Lassiter, Asst.
County Administrator
Mr. Mike Mabe, Director,
Libraries
Ms. Mary Martin Selby,
Dir., Human Resource
Services
11-527
Mr. R. John McCracken,
Dir., Transportation
Mr. Richard M. McElfish,
Dir., Env. Engineering
Mr. Jeffrey L. Mincks,
County Attorney
Mr. Glen Peterson, Dir.,
Community Correction
Services
Ms. Karen F. Russell,
Risk Manager
Chief Edward L. Senter,
Fire Department
Ms. Marsha Sharpe, Dir.,
Social Services
Ms. Sarah Snead, Dep.
County Administrator,
Human Services
Mr. Kirk Turner, Dir.,
Planning
Mr. Mike Westfall, Dir.,
Internal Audit
Mr. Scott Zaremba, Dir.,
Human Resource Programs
Mr. Warren called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at
3:04 p.m.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. AUGUST 24, 2011 REGULAR MEETING
B. SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 SPECIAL MEETING
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
approved the minutes of August 24, 2011, and September 7,
2011 as submitted.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
2. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
2.A. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
• Mr. Stegmaier was pleased to report that the Midlothian
area was named one of top ten suburbs in the United
States by CNBC.
• Mr. Stegmaier announced that on September 8, 2011,
Captain Jerry Pruden, Lieutenant Jake Britt, and
Firefighters Gene Ledlie and Bryce Ford responded to
Westmoreland County to assist with on-going rescue
operations from flash flooding. He provided details of
their efforts to rescue a citizen, a firefighter, and a
rescue squad member.
• Mr. Stegmaier was pleased to announce that Mr. Rick Witt
has been selected as the county's new Director of
Building Inspection, and Mr. Ron Clements has been
appointed Assistant Director of Building Inspection.
J
J
J
11-528
• Mr. Stegmaier presented a Hurricane Irene follow up,
stating that the Building Inspection Department has
issued 194 building permits for storm damage repairs and
30 electrical permits free of charge.
• Mr. Stegmaier provided an update on
of Cloverleaf Mall. He recognized
Retail Vice President of the co
partners, Crosland Southeast, and
Kroger's Real Estate Manager for
Region.
3. BOARD MEMBER REPORTS
the revitalization
Mr. James Downs,
unty's development
Fenton Childers,
the Mid-Atlantic
Mr. Holland reported that he attended a meeting at the
Irongate Civic Association on September 15th, regarding
concerns related to the aftermath of Hurricane Irene. He
announced that he will be speaking to the Highlands
Neighborhood Association regarding road improvements and
developments in the Highlands area on September 27th at 6:30
p.m. He also announced that the Dale and Matoaca Districts
will hold a joint citizen input meeting regarding the Draft
Comprehensive Plan on September 26th at 6:30 p.m., and a Dale
District community meeting regarding economic development
will be on October 24th at 7:00 p.m.
Ms. Durfee reported that on September 26th, there will be a
joint Matoaca and Dale District citizen input meeting
regarding the Draft Comprehensive Plan at 7:00 p.m, in the
Public Meeting Room. She announced she will be holding a
rescheduled roundtable meeting on October 4th at 6:30 p.m. at
Cosby High School. She also announced the Matoaca District
will hold a community meeting at the Ettrick-Matoaca Library
on September 27th at 6:30 p.m., to discuss. library
renovations.
Mr. Decker announced on September 22nd, there will be a joint
Clover Hill and Midlothian District citizen input meeting
regarding the Draft Comprehensive Plan at 7:00 p.m. at
Monacan High School.
Ms. Jaeckle reported that the Bermuda District already held
two community meetings regarding the Draft Comprehensive
Plan, but unfortunately there was a low turnout. She
expressed appreciation to staff for providing information to
her constituents.
Mr. warren announced he attended the Richmond Symphony Event
held at Clover Hill High School to commemorate the 10th
anniversary of the 9/11 disaster. He stated there was an
impressive turnout.
4. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE AGENDA ITEMS AND ADDITIONS DELETIONS
OR CHANGES ~N THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
added Item 8.C.3.c., Request for Music/Entertainment Festival
Permit for the Midlothian Food Festival; replaced Item 11.,
Closed Session Pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(A)(7), Code of
Virginia, 1950, as Amended, for Consultation with Legal
Counsel Pertaining to Actual Litigation in the Cases of
11-529
Hansen, et al. v. Stewart, et al., Stitzer, et als. v.
Chesterfield County and Lent, et als. v. County of
Chesterfield, and Pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(A)(1), Code of
Virginia, 1950, as Amended, Relating to the Performance of a
Specific County Employee.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
5. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS
5.A. RECOGNIZING BON AIR BAPTIST CHURCH FOR ITS OUTSTANDING
CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY'S OLDER ADULT
pQnr_u nMC
Mr. Golden introduced staff leaders of Bon Air Baptist
Church, who were present to receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the 50 and over population is the fastest
growing population in Chesterfield County, and recreation and
leisure programs promote a healthy lifestyle and contribute
to successful aging; and
WHEREAS, Bon Air Baptist Church has partnered with
Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department to
provide recreational programs for the 50 and over population;
and
WHEREAS, Bon Air Baptist Church provides numerous
classrooms, game rooms and gym space at no charge to the
county; and
WHEREAS, Bon Air Baptist Church also provides assistance
from their own Recreation Director and Assistant Recreation
Director and numerous support staff at no charge to the
county; and
WHEREAS, the partnership with Bon Air Baptist Church has
served over 2,500 participants age 50 and over during the
past year; and
WHEREAS, the partnership with Bon Air Baptist Church has
created opportunities for older adults to volunteer and the
opportunities for local businesses and organizations to
provide support; and
WHEREAS, these opportunities afforded by the generosity
of Bon Air Baptist Church have enhanced the health and well
being of all participants age 50 and over.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 21St day of September 2011,
publicly recognizes Bon Air Baptist Church, on behalf of the
citizens of Chesterfield County, for its dedication and
commitment to the 50 and over population in Chesterfield
County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Bon Air Baptist Church and that
J
J
J
11-530
this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of
this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Mr. Gecker commended the members of the church for their
dedication and commitment to the older. population of
Chesterfield County. He also expressed appreciation to the
church members for their involvement in the community.
Pastor Norman Burnes expressed appreciation to the Board of
Supervisors for the recognition.
5.B. RECOGNIZING MR. STEVE O'LEARY FOR HIS SERVICE AS A
MEMBER OF THE AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD
Mr. Key introduced Mr. Steve O'Leary, who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of Ms. Durfee, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mr. Steven O'Leary was originally appointed as
the Dale District representative on the Chesterfield County
Airport Advisory Board from July 2000 to March 2003; and
WHEREAS,. Mr. O'Leary moved to the Midlothian District in
March 2003, and was reappointed as the Midlothian District
representative, serving until July 2011; and
WHEREAS, Mr. O'Leary joined us with a unique background
as a professional aviation planner and provided guidance and
assistance during the runway's rehabilitation, north terminal
apron construction, development of the airport's rules and
regulations and with the future development of the airport
during the master planning process; and
WHEREAS, immediately following the tragic event of
September 11, 2001, Mr. O'Leary was instrumental in creating
and adopting a General Aviation Security Plan for
Chesterfield's airport, and the county received the
governor's award for taking this initiative; and
WHEREAS, Mr. O'Leary was of great assistance evaluating
and developing the proposal for the Chesterfield
Aviation/Science Museum and for participating in the
Chesterfield County Airport's annual air shows; and
WHEREAS, Mr. O'Leary provided guidance and leadership as
chairman of the Airport Advisory Board for four years; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Airport has been named
one of the best reliever airports in the state, and during
Mr. O'Leary's tenure on the Airport Advisory Board the
airport has grown to be one of the most well-regarded
airports in the Commonwealth of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the continuing growth in airport activities
during Mr. O'Leary's tenure has had a beneficial economic
impact on Chesterfield County, as recognized in a recent
economic impact study conducted by the State of Virginia.
11-531
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 21St day of September 2011,
publicly recognizes Mr. Steven O'Leary and expresses its
sincere gratitude and appreciation for his service to the
county as a member of the Chesterfield County Airport
Advisory Board.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. O'Leary and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Mr. Holland presented the executed resolution to Mr. O'Leary
and expressed appreciation for his dedicated service to the
Airport Advisory Board.
Mr. O'Leary expressed appreciation to the Board of
Supervisors for the recognition and stated it has been a
pleasure working on the Airport Advisory Board.
5.C. RECOGNIZING MRS. VIRGINIA L. HALL, DEPARTMENT OF
GENERAL SERVICES, BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, UPON HER
RETIREMENT
Mr. Key introduced Mrs. Virginia L. Hall who was present to
receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Virginia L. Hall retired August 1, 2011,
after providing twenty-five years of dedicated and faithful
service to Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Hall began her service on June 1, 1986, as
a custodian, in Buildings and Grounds, Custodial Services;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Hall has faithfully served three Custodial
Supervisors, Mrs. Eloise Thweatt, Mr. Gordon Smith and Mr.
Jihad Rasheed, during twenty-five years; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Hall performed her duties for the citizens
and employees of Chesterfield County in an outstanding
manner; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Hall supported many charities, including
United Way, American Heart Association Heart Walk, YMCA
Bright Beginnings, Christmas Mother Program, Junior
Achievement, and her co-workers in times of need.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 21St day of September 2011,
publicly recognizes Mrs. Virginia L. Hall and extends
appreciation for her twenty-five years of dedicated service
to the county, congratulates her upon her retirement, and
offers best wishes for a long and happy retirement.
J
J
J
11-532
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution
be presented to Mrs. Hall and that this resolution be
permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Ms. Durfee presented the executed resolution to Mrs. Hall and
expressed appreciation for her dedicated service to the
county.
Mrs. Hall, who was accompanied by her friends and family,
expressed appreciation to the Board for the recognition and
stated she has enjoyed working for Chesterfield County for 25
years.
Mr. Jihad Rasheed, Custodial Supervisor, commended Mrs. Hall
for all her hard work and enthusiasm.
Mr. Stegmaier presented an acrylic statute and county watch
to Mrs. Hall and congratulated her on her retirement.
5.D. RECOGNIZING THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON THE 100 ANNIVERSARY OF THE
FAIR'S OPERATION AND FOR PROVIDING AN OUTSTANDING 2011
COUNTY FAIR
Mr. Golden introduced several representatives of the
Chesterfield County Fair Association, who were present to
receive the resolution.
Mr. Holland commended the members on the operation and
management of the Chesterfield County Fair despite the
affects of Hurricane Irene.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Fair has long been an
integral part of the history and development of Chesterfield
County since 1911; and
WHEREAS, the fair originally developed from the desire
of farmers to display the items they had raised; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Fair Association has
organized, operated and managed the County Fair for 100
years; and
WHEREAS, Fair Association President Julia Williams, Fair
Manager G.B. Spencer and all the members of the Fair
Association worked tirelessly as volunteers to manage the
fair; and
WHEREAS, the 2011 County Fair marked the 98th annual fair
in the organization's 100-year history, missing only two
fairs due to World War II; and
WHEREAS, the 2011 County Fair ran for nine days at the
Chesterfield County Fairgrounds; and
11-533
WHEREAS, the fair provides the citizens of Chesterfield
County with entertainment, thrills, competitions,
demonstrations, food and fun; and
WHEREAS, the 2011 Chesterfield County Fair attracted
over 40,000 attendees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 21St day of September 2011,
on behalf of the residents of Chesterfield County, publicly
recognizes members of the Chesterfield County Fair
Association for their dedicated and unselfish commitment to
the operation of the Chesterfield County Fair for the past
100 years and expresses appreciation for the provision of the
County Fair to the residents of Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Mr. Holland presented the executed resolution to Ms. Julia
Williams,-Fair Association President, and to the members of
the Chesterfield County Fair Association, and thanked them
for their commitment to the operation of the fair.
Ms. Williams expressed appreciation to the Board of
Supervisors and county staff for their support.
Ms. Jaeckle commended members of the association for their
dedication and unselfish .commitment to the operation of the
fair.
Mr. G B Spencer, Fair Manager, expressed appreciation to the
Board of Supervisors and various county departments for their
support.
Ms. Mary Chalkley, Fair Association Historian, expressed
appreciation to the Board of Supervisors for the recognition
and stated she has been a part of the fair for forty-two
years.
Ms. Durfee highly praised the members of the Association for
their commitment and loyalty to county residents despite the
circumstances.
Ms. Jaeckle acknowledged that Miss Cadence Rose won the title
of "Little Miss", who is the granddaughter of Ms. Janice
Blakley, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Warren expressed appreciation to members and volunteers
of the fair for managing the fair despite the weather.
6. WORK SESSIONS
There were no Work Sessions at this time.
7. DEFERRED ITEMS
There were no Deferred Items at this time.
J
J
11-534
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.A. APPOINTMENTS
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
suspended its rules at this time to allow for simultaneous
nomination/appointment/reappointment to the First Tee Board
of Directors.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.A.1. FIRST TEE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
On motion of Ms. Durfee, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
simultaneously nominated/appointed Mr. Scott A. Rinaldi as a
member of the First Tee Board of Directors, whose term is
effective immediately and will expire on May 31, 2014.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.B. STREETLIGHT COST APPROVAL
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
approved the following streetlight in the Dale District:
• In the vicinity of 3940 Evelake Road
Cost to install streetlight: $341.01
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C. CONSENT ITEMS
8.C.1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
8.C.i.a. RECOGNIZING OCTOBER 3-7, 2011, AS "PARALEGALS'
WEEK" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, legal assistants and paralegals provide skilled
and essential professional services to licensed attorneys
throughout Virginia; and
WHEREAS, legal assistants and paralegals receive formal
education and training and gain valuable experience working
under the supervision of licensed attorneys; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Alliance of Paralegals
Associations (NAPA) issues educational standards and
professional guidelines to ensure that legal assistants are
competent and knowledgeable about their field; and
WHEREAS, the research and administrative work performed
by legal assistants and paralegals are essential to the
ability of attorneys to provide their clients with quality
legal services and representation; and
11-535
WHEREAS, VAPA member organizations sponsor educational
programs, seminars and forums designed to bring legal
assistants together to exchange ideas and methods used in
their occupation; and
WHEREAS, the VAPA encourages legal assistants and
paralegals to adhere to a high degree of ethical and
professional conduct and proficiency by issuing a code of
ethics for legal assistants and paralegals to practice.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes October 3-7, 2011, as
"Paralegals' Week" in Chesterfield County and calls its
significance to the attention of all its citizens.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.b. RECOGNIZING OCTOBER 9-15, 2011, AS "FIRE PREVENTION
WEEK" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the County of Chesterfield is committed to
ensuring the safety and security of all those living in and
visiting our county; and
WHEREAS, fire is a serious public safety concern both
locally and nationally, and homes are where people are at
greatest risk to fire; and
WHEREAS, cooking equipment is the leading cause of home
structure fires and associated injuries, and the third
leading cause of home fire deaths; and
WHEREAS, cooking-related fires are the greatest fire
cause in Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, heating appliances and smoking materials are
among the leading causes of all reported home fires; and
WHEREAS, the winter
approaching and supplemental
more prevalent; and
heating season is quickly
heating appliances will become
WHEREAS, the risk of dying in a home structure fire
caused by smoking materials rises with age; and
WHEREAS, working smoke alarms cut the risk of dying in
reported home fires in half; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield Fire and EMS personnel are
dedicated to reducing the occurrence of home fires and home
fire injuries through prevention and protection education;
and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County residents are responsive to
public education measures and are able to take personal steps
to increase their safety from fire, especially in their
homes; and
J
J
J
11-536
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County residents who have planned
and practiced a home fire escape plan are more prepared and
will therefore be more likely to survive a fire; and
WHEREAS, the 2011 Fire Prevention Week theme, "It's Fire
Prevention Week. Protect your Family from Fire!" effectively
serves to remind us all of the simple actions we can take to
keep our homes and. families safe from fire during Fire
Prevention Week and year-round.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes October 9-15, 2011, as
"Fire Prevention Week" throughout the county, and urges all
the people of Chesterfield County to protect their homes and
families by heeding the important safety messages of Fire
Prevention week 2011, and to support the many activities and
efforts of Chesterfield County's Fire and Emergency Medical
Services.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.i.c. RECOGNIZING COUNTY EMPLOYEES UPON THEIR RETIREMENT
8.C.l.c.l. CORPORAL R. HARVEY HEVENER, POLICE DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Corporal R. Harvey Hevener will retire from the
Chesterfield County Police Department on October 1, 2011,
after providing 22 years of quality service to the citizens
of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Hevener has faithfully served the
county in the capacities of police officer, police detective,
senior, master, career officer and corporal; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure with the Chesterfield County
Police Department, Corporal Hevener served diligently in the
Uniform Operations Bureau, the Investigations Bureau and the
Operational Support Bureau; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Hevener and fellow School Resource
Officers were the recipients of a Unit Citation Award in
recognition of their professionalism, teamwork and
dedication, and in addition to their regular duties, these
officers maintained a criminal clearance rate at a level much
higher than expected; .and
WHEREAS, while assigned as a School Resource Officer at
the Chesterfield Technical Center, Corporal Hevener also
served as an instructor for the Law Enforcement Program and
was considered an asset to the school administration staff
and a vital part to their administrative team; and
WHEREAS, Corporal Hevener has received numerous letters
of commendation, thanks and appreciation from the citizens of
Chesterfield County for service rendered; and
11-537
WHEREAS, Corporal Hevener has provided the Chesterfield
County Police Department with many years of loyal and
dedicated service; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of
Supervisors will miss Corporal Hevener's diligent service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Corporal R. Harvey
Hevener, and extends on behalf of its members and the
citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for his service
to the county, congratulations upon his retirement, and best
wishes for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.1.c.2. MS. SUSAN DECKER, SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Susan Decker began her career with seniors
while employed with Lucy Corr Village as Admissions
Coordinator from 1989 through 1999; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Decker was
by the Chesterfield-Colonial
Services on June 28, 1999; and
hired as an Eligibility Worker
Heights Department of Social
WHEREAS, Mrs. Decker's assistance to long-term care
customers and families resulted in improved services for
county residents; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Decker assisted in the reorganization of
the Adult Medicaid unit, and she was instrumental in its
success; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Decker consistently demonstrated
flexibility and willingness to meet the needs of her team
throughout her tenure in the department; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Decker assisted her team in effectively
responding to the unprecedented growth in the aging
population and the unprecedented growth in the Adult Medicaid
caseload; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Decker consistently displayed a positive
attitude in her daily interactions with peers as well as
customers and performed her job duties with professionalism
and dedication; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Decker provided excellent customer service
over the years and has shown dedication and commitment to
serving the elderly and disabled adult citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the outstanding
contributions of Mrs. Susan Decker, expresses the
appreciation of all residents for her service to the county
and the City of Colonial Heights and extends its
J
J
J
11-538
congratulations upon her retirement, as well as best wishes
for a long and happy retirement.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.d. RECOGNIZING SEPTEMBER 2011, AS "ALCOHOL AND DRUG
ADDICTION RECOVERY MONTH" IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, behavioral health is an essential part of
health and one's overall wellness; and
WHEREAS, prevention works, treatment is effective, and
people can and do recover from substance use and mental
disorders; and
WHEREAS, all people have the fundamental and inherent
value to be accepted and treated with respect, human dignity,
and worth; and
WHEREAS, individuals should have access to fully
participate in community life including economic advancement
and prosperity; fair and decent housing; quality education;
and positive opportunities to benefit from and contribute to
material, cultural, and social progress; and
WHEREAS, it is critical to educate our policymakers,
friends aid family members, health care providers, and
businesses that substance use and mental disorders are
treatable, and that people should seek assistance for these
conditions with the same urgency as they would any other
health condition; and
WHEREAS, all Americans have the opportunity to access
provisions within the Affordable Care Act and Mental Health
Parity and Addictions Equity Act, aimed to improve physical
and emotional health while ensuring people will receive the
care they need at a reasonable cost; and
WHEREAS, in 2009, 4.3 million people received treatment
for a substance use disorder and 30.2 million people for a
mental health problem (2009 National Survey on Drug Use and
Health); and
WHEREAS, substance use and mental disorders are serious
public health problems, and we must continue to reach the
millions more who need help; and
WHEREAS, to help more people achieve long-term recovery,
and learn how recovery positively benefits the nation's
overall well-being, the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, the White House Office of National Drug
Control Policy, and Chesterfield's Community Services Board,
Substance Abuse Services Program invite all residents of
Chesterfield County to participate in "Recovery Month":
Prevention Works, Treatment is Effective, People Recover.
11-539
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes the month of September
2011 as "Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month" in
Chesterfield County, Virginia and calls upon the people of
Chesterfield to observe this month with appropriate programs,
activities, and ceremonies supporting this year's theme,
"Join the Voices for Recovery: Recovery Benefits Everyone."
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.l.e. RECOGNIZING SEPTEMBER 26, 2011, AS "FAMILY DAY" IN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the observance of "Family Day - A Day to Eat
Dinner with Your Children" provides a unique opportunity for
families in Chesterfield County to join one another at the
dinner table as a means of strengthening family
relationships; and
WHEREAS, parental influence is known to be one of the
most crucial factors in determining the likelihood of
substance abuse by teenagers; and
WHEREAS, surveys conducted by the National Center on
Addiction and Substance Abuse have consistently found that
children and teenagers who routinely eat dinner with their
families are far less likely to use cigarettes, alcohol and
illegal drugs; and
WHEREAS, meal times offer opportunities for families to
spend time together, providing a basic structure that
strengthens and encourages lasting relationships; and
WHEREAS, young people from families who have infrequent
family dinners, compared to those that have frequent family
dinners, are two and a half times more likely to have used
tobacco and marijuana and one and a half times more likely to
have consumed alcohol; and
WHEREAS, the correlation between family dinners and
reduced risk for teen substance abuse is well documented; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County Youth Planning and
Development and SAFE Inc., Chesterfield's substance abuse
prevention coalition, are promoting the importance of family
dinners to parents in Chesterfield County, Virginia; and
WHEREAS., the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
recognizes that eating. dinner as a family is an important
step toward raising drug-free children.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors recognizes Monday, September 26,
2011, as "Family Day - A Day to Eat Dinner With Your
Children," to recognize the positive impact of strong family
interaction on the well being and future success of the young
people in Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
J
J
J
11-540
8.C.2. ACCEPTANCE OF AWARD FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR
VEHICLES FOR THE FY2012 HIGHWAY SAFETY PROJECT GRANT
Ms. Durfee inquired whether the funds would be geared towards
alcohol prevention/traffic .safety.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
accepted and appropriated a grant awarded by the Department
of Motor Vehicles for the FY2012 Highway Safety Project Grant
in the amount of $85,253 and authorized the County
Administrator to execute all documents.
Ayes: warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.3. REQUESTS FOR MUSIC/ENTERTAINMENT FESTIVAL PERMITS
8.C.3.a. FOR THE 2011 VIRGINIA TRANSPLANT GAMES
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
granted a music/entertainment festival permit for the 2011
Virginia Transplant Games to be held Saturday, October 1,
2011.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.3.b. FOR CHESTERFEST
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
granted a music/entertainment festival permit for ChesterFest
to be held Saturday, September 24, 2011.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.3.c. FOR ANNUAL MAGNIFICENT MIDLOTHIAN FOOD FESTIVAL
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
granted a music/entertainment festival permit for the
Midlothian Rotary Club to be held on Wednesday, October 5,
2011.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.4. TRANSFER OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS FROM THE
BERMUDA DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUND TO THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DURING THE CHESTER
KIWANIS CLUB'S ANNUAL CHRISTMAS PARADE
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
transferred $6,159.35 from the Bermuda District Improvement
Fund to the Police Department for traffic control during the
Chester Kiwanis Club's Annual Christmas Parade.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
11-541
8.C.5. APPROVAL OF A CHANGE IN THE TERMS OF THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOTE FOR THE CLOVERLEAF MALL
PURCHASE, AND APPROVAL OF A SUPPORT AGREEMENT AND
OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR THE FINANCING AND REDEVELOPMENT
OF THE MALL SITE
Mr. Gecker recognized those involved in the revitalization of
Cloverleaf Mall. He stated those in attendance are eager to
get to work demolishing the mall to make way for construction
of the new Kroger grocery store. He expressed appreciation
for their patience.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved a change in the terms of the note between the
Economic Development Authority and Wells Fargo, approved a
support agreement between the county and Wells Fargo and
authorized the County Administrator to execute other
documents as necessary to facilitate the financing and
redevelopment of the former Cloverleaf Mall property.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Mr. Holland expressed appreciation to staff for their hard
work throughout the process.
Ms. Jaeckle commended Mr. Fenton Childers for his work ethic
and continued commitment to Chesterfield County.
8.C.6. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCES
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the street described below is shown on a plat
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the street
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Maginoak
Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways:
n~~itinn
Reason for Change: New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: X33.1-229
Street Name and/or Route Number
J
J
11-542
• Maginoak Court, State Route Number 7572
From: Providence Road, (Route 678)
To: cul-de-sac, a distance of: 0.25 miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 196, Pg. 53
Right of Way width (feet) = 40
And, further, the Board adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the streets described below are shown on plats
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia
Department of Transportation has advised this Board the
streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision
Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of
Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests
the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets
described below to the secondary system of state highways,
pursuant to Section 33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the
Department's Subdivision Street Requirements.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board guarantees
a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any
necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of
this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the
Virginia Department of Transportation.
Project/Subdivision: Foxcreek Crossing Phase III
Type Change to the Secondary System of State Highways:
Addition
Reason for .Change: New subdivision street
Pursuant to Code of Virginia Statute: X33.1-229
Street Name and/or Route Number
• Foxcreek Crossing, State Route Number 7297
From: 0.10 miles Northeast of Midnight Crossing, (Route 7584)
To: Prescott Level, (Route 7583), a distance of: 0.03 miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of Way width (feet) = var
• Midnight Crossing, State Route Number 7584
From: Foxcreek Crossing, .(Route 7297)
To: 0.01 miles North of Foxcreek Crossing, (Route 7297), a
distance of: 0.01 miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of Way width (feet) = 62
• Foxcreek Crossing, State Route Number 7297
From: 0.03 miles Northeast of Prescotts Level, (Route 7583)
To: Burnt Mills Lane, (Route 7327), a distance of: 0.11
miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of Way width (feet) = 60
• Foxcreek Crossing, State Route Number 7297
From: Burnt Mills Lane, (Route 7327)
To: 0.02 miles Northeast of Burnt Mills Lane, (Route 7327), a
distance of: 0.02 miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of Way width (feet) = 60
11-543
• Foxcreek Crossing, State Route Number 7297
From: Midnight Crossing, (Route 7584)
To: 0.10 miles Northeast of Midnight Crossing, (Route 7584),
a distance of: 0.10 miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of Way width (feet) = 60
• Foxcreek Crossing, State Route Number 7297
From: Otterdale Road, (Route 667)
To: 0.02 miles Northeast of Otterdale Road, (Route 667), a
distance of: 0.02 miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of Way width (feet) = var
• Heartquake Trace, State Route Number 7582
From: Foxcreek Crossing, (Route 7297)
To: 0.02 miles North of Foxcreek Crossing, (Route 7297), a
distance of: 0.02 miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of Way width (feet) = 62
• Foxcreek Crossing, State Route Number 7297
From: Prescott Level, (Route 7583)
To: 0.03 miles Northeast of Prescotts Level, (Route 7583), a
distance of: 0.03 miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of Way width (feet) = var
• Foxcreek Crossing, State Route Number 7297
From: 0.02 miles Northeast of Otterdale Road, (Route 667)
To: Midnight Crossing, (Route 7584), a distance of: 0.14
miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of way width (feet) = 60
• Prescotts Level, State Route Number 7583
From: Foxcreek Crossing, (Route 7297)
To: 0.02 miles South of Foxcreek Crossing, (Route 7297), a
distance of: 0.02 miles.
Recordation Reference: Db. 6872, Pg. 519
Right of Way width (feet) = 62
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.7. REQUESTS TO QUITCLAIM
8.C.7.a. A PORTION OF A SIXTEEN-FOOT WATER EASEMENT ACROSS
THE PROPERTY OF WHITCO, L.L.C.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of a 16' water easement across the property of
Whitco, L.L.C. (It is noted a copy of the plat is filed with
the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays:. None.
J
J
J
11-544
8.C.7.b. A PORTION OF A VARIABLE WIDTH STORM WATER
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE EASEMENT
ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF COLONIAL HEIGHTS BAPTIST
CHURCH
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
authorized the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the
County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a
portion of a variable width SWM/BMP easement across the
property of Colonial Heights Baptist Church. (It is noted a
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.8. REQUEST FOR PERMISSION FROM CHRISTIAAN V. GREENE AND
KATIE B. GREENE FOR A PROPOSED FENCE AND PORTION OF
AN EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO ENCROACH WITHIN
VARIOUS EASEMENTS ACROSS LOT 46, HAYWOOD VILLAGE,
SECTION A AT CHARTER COLONY
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
granted Christiaan V. Greene and Katie B. Greene permission
for a proposed fence and portion of an existing concrete
driveway to encroach within a 16' drainage easement, 10'
common area easement, 20' sewer easement, 10' temporary
construction easement and an 8' easement across Lot 46,
Haywood Village, Section A at Charter Colony, subject to the
execution of a license agreement. (It is noted a copy of the
plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.9. APPROPRIATION OF DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE
PORT WALTHALL DRIVE EXTENSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ACCESS PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Gecker,. seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
appropriated an additional $43,591 in anticipated developer
contributions for the Port Walthall Drive Extension Economic
Development Access Project.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
8.C.10. APPROVAL OF RIGHT OF ENTRY AND CONVEYANCE OF A
PERMANENT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
UTILITY EASEMENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR
THE GENITO ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OVER SWIFT CREEK
RESERVOIR WEST OF WOOLRIDGE ROAD PROJECT
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved a request from the Virginia Department of
Transportation for right of entry and to convey a permanent
VDOT utility easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia on
county owned right of way for the construction of the Genito
Road Bridge Replacement over Swift Creek Reservoir West of
Woolridge Road Project. (It is noted a copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
11-545
9. REPORTS
9.A. REPORT ON DEVELOPER WATER AND SEWER CONTRACTS
9.B. REPORT ON STATUS OF GENERAL FUND BALANCE, RESERVE FOR
FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS, DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT FUNDS AND
LEASE PURCHASES
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
accepted the following reports: a Report on Developer Water
and Sewer Contracts; and a Report on Status of General Fund
Balance, Reserve for Future Capital Projects, District
Improvement Funds and Lease Purchases.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
10. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Mr. Jerry Heimiller expressed concerns regarding boats being
housed at the boathouse at Robious Landing Park that are not
currently being used.
Several Board members requested information relative to the
Robious Landing Park lease and funding sources.
Ms. Joan Barnes addressed the
defects and code violations
moisture build-up and mold.
Board relative to structural
at her home, resulting in
In response to Mr. Warren's questions, Mr. Dupler stated
there was an inspection conducted and all of the structural
damage Ms. Barnes referred to has been replaced. He further
stated removing any supplementary sheetrock would be
pointless to see additional framing. He stated if Ms. Barnes
disagrees with the determination by Building Inspection
Department, she may appeal those decisions.
Mr. Mincks stated the appeal process would go before the
Building Code Appeals Board. He further stated the Board of
Supervisors has no authority in the matter.
In response to Ms. Durfee's question regarding pictures, Mr.
Dupler stated Building Inspection has investigated all of Ms.
Barnes' concerns. He further stated the images are
reconstructed pictures of Ms. Barnes' home.
Mr. Pete Stith expressed appreciation to the Board for their
leadership and dedication and presented various departments
with personal contributions.
Ms. Durfee expressed appreciation to Mr. Tom Jacobson, Ms.
Latisha Jenkins, Dr. Keith Miller and all the
business/community leaders who have contributed to the
success of the Village of Ettrick and Virginia State
University.
J
J
J
11-546
11. CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2-3711(A)(7),
CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, FOR CONSULTATION
WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PERTAINING TO ACTUAL LITIGATION IN
THE CASES OF HANSEN, ET AL. V. STEWART, ET AL.,
STITZER, ET ALS. V. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AND LENT, ET
ALS. V. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
On motion of Ms. Durfee, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
went into closed session pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(A)(7),
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for consultation with
legal counsel pertaining to actual litigation in the cases of
Hansen, et al. v. Stewart, et al., Stitzer, et als. v.
Chesterfield County and Lent, et als. v. County of
Chesterfield, and pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(A)(1), Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, relating to the performance of a
specific county employee.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Closed Session in accordance with a formal vote of the
Board and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
effective July 1, 1989 provides for certification that such
Closed Session was conducted in conformity with. law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Board of Supervisors
does hereby certify. that to the best of each member's
knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully exempted
from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of
Information Act were discussed in the Closed Session to which
this certification applies, and ii) only such business
matters were identified in the Motion by which the Closed
Session was convened were heard, discussed, or considered by
the Board. No members dissents from this certification.
The Board being polled, the vote was as follows:
Mr. Gecker: Aye.
Mr. Holland: Aye.
Ms. Durfee: Aye.
Ms. Jaeckle: Aye.
Mr. Warren: Aye.
Mr. Warren stated an evaluation of the County Administrator
was completed. He further stated the Board of Supervisors
feels Mr. Stegmaier has done a fantastic job with leading
Chesterfield County effectively over a very difficult,
recessionary period.
Mr. Mincks stated the Board must suspend its rules to add a
matter to the agenda. and also suspend its rules requiring
that the matter be of an emergency nature.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
suspended its rules to add a matter to the agenda and also
suspended its rules requiring that the matter be of an
emergency nature.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
11-547
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, the Board
approved a salary increase of two percent for the County
Administrator retroactive to July 1, 2011 (consistent with
county employees); and amended the County Administrator's
contract to include reimbursement for mileage.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
12. DINNER
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
recessed to Room 303, for dinner.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Reconvening:
13. INVOCATION
Minister Angela Roberts, New Direction Evangelistic Church,
gave the invocation.
14. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA
Miss Stefanie Page led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag
of the United States of America.
15. RESOLUTIONS
15.A. RECOGNIZING CROSS CREEK NURSERY AND LANDSCAPING FOR
ITS OUTSTANDING ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Mr. Kappel introduced the management team of Cross Creek
Nursery and Landscaping, who were present to receive the
resolution.
On motion of Mr. warren, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Cross Creek Nursery is located at 501
Courthouse Road in Chesterfield County, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the business was started in 1974 by Gene and
Diane McAuliffe as a tropical plant store called Tropical
Treehouse, located in Carytown; and
WHEREAS, as the business grew into several retail
florist locations and an interior maintenance business, the
need for greenhouse space became very important; and
WHEREAS, in 1980, Cross Creek Nursery was born to help
provide that required greenhouse space; and
J
J
J
11-548
WHEREAS, today, the original owners and second-
generation family members still operate Cross Creek Nursery
and Landscaping, which has become a large, full-service
operation that serves all of Central Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Cross Creek Nursery has certified
horticulturists on staff to assist customers with their
landscape questions; and
WHEREAS, Cross Creek Nursery offers display gardens,
ponds and paths to demonstrate a variety of design
possibilities; and
WHEREAS, Cross Creek Nursery also has a tree farm of
more than 100 acres and can provide large specimens to give
landscapes a mature look; and
WHEREAS, customers can shop online for sod and mulch
delivery throughout Central Virginia; and
WHEREAS, in 2010, Cross Creek Nursery earned "Best in
Show" status at the Maymont Flower and Garden Show; and
WHEREAS, in 2011, Cross Creek Nursery was again named
"Best in Show" at this same event.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 21St day of September 2011,
publicly recognizes Cross Creek Nursery for its back-to-back
"Best in Show" awards at the Maymont Flower and Garden Show,
congratulates the business on its long tenure in the county
and on its many accomplishments, and extends best wishes for
continued success.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Cross Creek Nursery, and that this
resolution be permanently recorded among the. papers of this
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Mr. Warren presented the executed resolution to Mr. Gene
McAuliffe. and congratulated his team of family members on
their accomplishment and ability to provide great customer
service to Chesterfield County.
Founder Gene McAuliffe, accompanied by his family, expressed
appreciation to the Board of Supervisors for the recognition.
15.B. RECOGNIZING RICHMOND ICE ZONE SKATING CHAMPIONS FOR
THEIR OUTSTANDING REPRESENTATION OF CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY
Mr. Kappel introduced Ms. Stefanie Page, Ms. Kaelyn Atkinson,
Miss Kasey Atkinson, Mr. Caston Eagles, Miss Corrighan
Eagles, and Ms. Hannah Sypniewski of Richmond Ice Zone
Skating, who were present to receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Warren, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
11-549
WHEREAS, a number of Chesterfield County residents are
involved in skating programs at Richmond Ice Zone, located in
Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, "It's a Mystery" is a figure-skating ensemble
from the county that trains at the facility; and
WHEREAS, "It's a Mystery" is comprised of Lauren Page, a
Monacan High School graduate who is now a student at Virginia
Commonwealth University; Stefanie Page, who attends
Midlothian Middle School; Kaelyn Atkinson, an Elizabeth Davis
Middle School student; Kasey Atkinson, who attends Enon
Elementary School; Gaston Eagles, a Manchester Middle School
student; and Corrighan Eagles, who attends Jacobs Elementary
School; and
WHEREAS, this talented team of skaters ranges in age
from 5 to 21, and performs skits in which the team's members
solve a mystery in each performance, aided by Scooby-Doo, the
Hanna-Barbera Productions Great Dane cartoon character; and
WHEREAS, the six-member team, which is coached by member
Lauren Page, took first place at the 2010 Coventry
Commonwealth Games of Virginia in Charlottesville, Virginia;
and
WHEREAS, the team qualified to compete in the 2011 State
Games of America in San Diego in August 2011, a national
competition similar to an Olympic experience; and
WHEREAS, at the State Games of America, coach Lauren
Page, 21, led the ensemble to a first-place win, and also
brought home two other first-place medals; and
WHEREAS, Stefanie Page, 13, competed in two additional
events and earned first-place awards in each. of the Freestyle
6 events, bringing home three gold medals; and
WHEREAS, Corrighan Eagles, who is 5, won first-place
awards in three additional events and a third-place medal in
another; and
WHEREAS, Gaston Eagles, 14, received a gold medal for
his participation in the ensemble event; and
WHEREAS, Kasey Atkinson, 9, also received a gold medal
for the ensemble skating event; and
WHEREAS, Kaelyn Atkinson, 13, brought home two gold
medals, one for the ensemble and one for another event; and
WHEREAS, "It's a Mystery" represents Chesterfield County
and the Richmond region well and the team's outstanding
athleticism and creativity reflect positively on the county
and its schools; and
WHEREAS, Hannah Sypniewski, a 10th grade student at the
Trinity Episcopal School, is 15, and also is a Richmond Ice
Zone figure skater who has been skating for six years and
competes at the Preliminary level; and
J
J
J
11-550
WHEREAS, Ms. Sypniewski also took first place at the
2010 Coventry Commonwealth Games of Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Sypniewski competed in two events at the
2011 State Games of America and won 1St place in her Solo
Artistic Silver Preliminary in her age level, bringing home a
gold medal.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 21St day of September 2011,
publicly recognizes the outstanding artistry and talent of
the members of "It's a Mystery" and of Hannah Sypniewski,
congratulates all of these outstanding skaters on their many
accomplishments, and extends best wishes for continued
success.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to "It's a Mystery," and to Hannah
Sypniewski, and that this resolution be permanently recorded
among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Decker.
Nays: None.
Mr. Warren presented the executed resolution to the champions
of "It's a Mystery," and to Ms. Sypniewski and congratulated
them on their many accomplishments.
Each member of the skating team introduced themselves.
15.C. RECOGNIZING "CHRISTMAS MOTHER DAY" IN CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY
Ms. Sharpe introduced Mrs. Linda King, this year's Christmas
Mother, who was present to receive the resolution.
On motion of Ms. Jaeckle, seconded by Mr. Holland, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, most families in Chesterfield County enjoy
peace and happiness during the Christmas holidays; and
WHEREAS, there are many children, elderly and the less
fortunate, who do not have the means to enjoy this special
time of year; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Christmas
Mother Program has successfully provided food, gifts and
clothing to many of our citizens in the past; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Linda King has been elected Christmas
Mother for 2011 and requests support of all the citizens of
Chesterfield County to ensure that those less fortunate may
enjoy this special season of the year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 21St day of September 2011,
publicly recognizes October 11, 2011, as "Christmas Mother
Day" and urges all citizens of Chesterfield County to support
this worthy endeavor.
11-551
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of
Supervisors publicly commends the Christmas Mother Program
for its successful efforts in past years and extends best
wishes for a successful 2011 season.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of .this
resolution be presented to Mrs. King and that this resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Ms. Jaeckle presented the executed resolution and a
contribution to Mrs. King on behalf of the county and wished
her success as Christmas Mother.
Mrs. King expressed her appreciation and provided information
to the Board regarding the Christmas Mother program.
15.D. RECOGNIZING MR. DOUGLAS R. SOWERS FOR HIS GENEROUS
LAND DONATION TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Mr. Golden introduced Mr. Douglas R. Sowers who was present
to receive the resolution.
On motion of Mr. Holland, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County, Virginia has as one of its
strategic goals, that of being responsible protectors of the
environment; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Douglas R. Sowers is an active outdoorsman
and supports responsible conservation of our natural
resources for the use and enjoyment of this and future
generations; and
WHEREAS, the county's recent acquisition of the
community park site adjacent to Courthouse Road will be a
significant addition to the County Park System; and
WHEREAS, the 12.7-acre parcel of land along Courthouse
Road and adjacent to the new community park site was
undeveloped; and
WHEREAS, the parcel would add conserved forest areas and
allow for improved park access for future park visitors; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Sowers approached Parks and Recreation
staff offering to donate the property to the county at no
cost.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors, this 21St day of September 2011,
publicly recognizes the generous donation of land by Mr.
Douglas R. Sowers, and expresses, on behalf of all of
Chesterfield County residents, sincere appreciation for his
generosity.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this
resolution be presented to Mr. Sowers and that this
J
J
11-552
resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of the
Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Mr. Holland presented the executed resolution to Mr. Sowers
and expressed appreciation for his generous donation to
Chesterfield County.
Mr. Sowers, accompanied by his wife, stated the late Ms. Anna
Atkins is the real hero in this scenario.
16. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
Mr. Bill Johnson addressed the Board relative to property
that he believes is owned by the county that has not been
maintained and expressed concerns relative to homeowners'
association dues and personal landscaping.
Ms. Jaeckle stated she will have a staff member look into the
issue.
Mr. Warren requested a follow-up from the County
Administrator.
17. REQUESTS FOR MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND REZONING
PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TO BE HEARD IN THE
FOLLOWING ORDER: - WITHDRAWALS/DEFERRALS - CASES WHERE
THE APPLICANT ACCEPTS THE RECOMMENDATION AND THERE IS NO
OPPOSITION - CASES WHERE THE APPLICANT DOES NOT ACCEPT
THE RECOMMENDATION AND/OR THERE IS PUBLIC OPPOSITION
WILL BE HEARD AT SECTION 19
11SN0241
In Midlothian Magisterial District, Macerich Partnership LP
requests conditional use approval and amendment of zoning
district map to permit a tattoo parlor (to include body
piercing) on .1 acre of a 73.8 acre tract in Neighborhood
Business (C-2) and Community Business (C-3) Districts
fronting 1020 feet on the north line of Midlothian Turnpike,
200 feet east of Huguenot Road, also fronting 1080 feet on
the east line of Huguenot Road, 200 feet north of Midlothian
Turnpike. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for regional mixed use. Tax ID 741-
709-Part of 1430.
Mr. Turner presented a summary pf Case 11SN0241 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to the condition.
Ms. Carrie Coyner, representing the applicant, stated the
tattoo parlor has been operating in Chesterfield Towne Center
for approximately two years, without required conditional use
approval and in violation of the Zoning Ordinance. She
further stated the applicant seeks to gain conditional use
approval for the use in order to bring it into compliance
with ordinance requirements. She stated the business
currently has seven locations, and has been in operation for
over twenty years. She stated this parlor has not been a
11-553
deterrent for other businesses to join the mall. She noted an
additional condition should be imposed as follows: This
conditional use approval shall be exclusively for River City
Tattoo and Body Piercing and limited to one unit within the
mall and shall not be transferable nor run with the land.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
There being no one to address the request, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Gecker made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for the
Board to approve Case 11SN0241, subject to the conditions in
the staff report, as well as imposing the following:
This conditional use approval shall be exclusively for River
City Tattoo and Body Piercing, and limited to one unit within
the mall, and shall not be transferrable nor run with the
land.
Ms. Jaeckle stated the mall's management addresses any
concerns that may be expressed by local tenants.
In response to Mr. Holland's question regarding the
conditional use approval process, Ms. Coyner stated
applicants are not required to check on their requirement to
obtain a business license.
Mr. Warren called for a vote on the motion of Mr. Gecker,
seconded by Mr. Warren, for the Board to approve Case
11SN0241, subject to the following conditions:
1. In the event the County or state adopts health
regulations for these businesses, this business shall be
subject to any such regulations. (P)
(STAFF NOTE: If this request is approved the use would be
allowed on up to any .1 acre area within the subject
property.)
2. This conditional use approval shall be exclusively for
River City Tattoo and Body Piercing, and limited to one
unit within the mall, and shall not be transferrable nor
run with the land. (P)
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
11SN0242
In Dale Magisterial District, Kelly Butterfield requests
conditional use approval and amendment of zoning district map
to permit a dwelling separated from the principal dwelling in
Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-7) Districts on 4 acres
known as 10100 Salem Church Road. Density will be controlled
by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
residential use of 1.0 - 2.5 dwelling units/acre. Tax ID 776-
662-0376.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 11SN0242 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to the conditions.
Mr. Kelly Butterfield accepted the conditions.
J
J
J
11-554
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
There being no one to address the request, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Holland stated that the application fee for this type of
application should be reexamined.
Mr. Holland made a motion, seconded by Ms. Durfee, for the
Board to approve Case 11SN0242, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Occupancy of the second dwelling unit shall be limited
to: the occupants of the principal dwelling unit,
individuals related to them by blood, marriage, adoption
or guardianship, foster children, guests and any
domestic servants. (P)
2. For the purpose of providing record notice, within sixty
(60) days of approval of this request, a deed
restriction shall be recorded setting forth the
limitation in Condition 1 above. The deed book and page
number of such restriction and a copy of the restriction
as recorded shall be submitted to the Planning
Department. (P)
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
11SN0246
In Bermuda Magisterial District, SINA08, LLC - Anil Patel
requests amendment of zoning (Case 05SN0181) and amendment of
zoning district map relative to uses in a General Business
(C-5) District on 5 acres fronting 940 feet on the northwest
line of Woods Edge Road, across from Walthall Industrial
Parkway. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for commercial use. Tax IDs 802-637-
1703 and 4227.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 11SN0246 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
and acceptance of the proffered conditions.
Mr. Chris Thompson of the Timmons Group, representing the
applicant, accepted the recommendation.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
There being no one to address the request, the public hearing
was closed.
Ms. Jaeckle made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for the
Board to approve Case 11SN0246 and accept the following
proffered conditions:
1. Uses shall be limited those permitted by right or with
restrictions in the Community Business (C-3) District
and uses permitted by right in the Light Industrial (I-
1) District, except the following uses shall not be
permitted:
a. Cocktail lounges and nightclubs
11-555
b. Liquor stores (P)
2. The following uses shall be prohibited:
a. Halfway houses
b. Landfills (P)
(STAFF NOTE: These proffered conditions supersede Proffered
Condition 6 of Case 05SN0181 for the request property only.)
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
ii~Nn~aR
In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Central Baptist Church
requests conditional use approval and amendment of zoning
district map to permit a private school use in an
Agricultural (A) District on 20.4 acres fronting 960 feet on
the west line of Courthouse Road, across from Dakins Drive.
Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance
standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is
appropriate for residential use of 2.0 dwellings/acre or
less. Tax IDs 744-695-5625; and 745-695-2854 and 2990.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 11SN0248 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to the conditions.
Ms. Cara Alexander accepted the conditions.
Mr. warren called for public comment.
There being no one to address the request, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Warren made a motion, seconded by Mr. Holland, for the
Board to approve Case 11SN0248, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Except where the requirements of the underlying
Agricultural (A) zoning district are more restrictive,
any new development for school use shall conform to the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for commercial uses
in Emergining Growth Areas, excluding buffer
requirements. (P)
2. There shall be no active playfields, courts or similar
active recreational facilities which could accommodate
organized sports such as football, soccer, basketball,
etc. (P)
3. Any playground areas shall be located a minimum of forty
(40) feet from all property lines. Within this setback,
existing vegetation shall be supplemented, where
necessary, with landscaping or other devices designed to
achieve the buffering standards contained in Section 19-
522 (a) (1) of the Zoning Ordinance. (P)
(NOTE: These conditions would not apply to any permitted use,
such as a church, on the property.)
J
J
J
11-556
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
~~~un~aa
In Matoaca Magisterial District, Chris Stewart requests
amendment of conditional use planned development (Case
85SN0035) and amendment of zoning district map to permit a
nightclub in a Neighborhood Business (C-2) District on .9
acre known as 13923 Hull Street Road. Density will be
controlled by zoning conditions or Ordinance standards. The
Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for
community mixed use. Tax ID 726-672-6816.
Mr. Turner presented a summary of Case 11SN0234 and stated
both the Planning Commission and staff recommended approval
subject to the conditions.
Mr. Chris Stewart accepted the conditions.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
There being no one to address the request, the public hearing
was closed.
Ms. Durfee expressed appreciation to the Mr. Stewart for his
willingness to hold a community meeting and agreeing with the
additional condition.
Ms. Durfee then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Holland, for
the Board to approve Case 11SN0234, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Nightclub use shall be permitted. (P)
2. This use shall be granted to Chris Stewart and/or and
entity in which he has a majority ownership or
controlling interest, exclusively, and shall not be
transferred or run with the land. (P)
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
i~cNn~a~
In Bermuda Magisterial District, The Phoenix LLP requests
amendment of conditional use (Case 08SN0197) and amendment of
zoning district map relative to uses in a General Industrial
(I-2) District on 9.8 acres fronting 600 feet on the south
line of West Hundred Road, 2170 feet west of Rivers Bend
Road. Density will be controlled by zoning conditions or
Ordinance standards. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the
property is appropriate for light industrial use. Tax ID 810-
652-2734.
Ms. Peterson presented a summary of Case 11SN0247 and stated
the Planning Commission recommended approval and acceptance
of the proffered condition. She further stated staff
recommended denial because the proposed land uses do not
conform to the Consolidated Eastern Area Plan, which suggests
this property is appropriate for light to moderate industrial
11-557
uses and whereas the proposed uses are consistent with the
use exceptions previously approved in 2008, these uses are
not representative of, nor compatible with existing and
anticipated area industrial development. She noted there was
no opposition present at the Planning Commission meeting.
Ms. Carrie Coyner, representing the applicant, requested
approval of additional uses. She stated the Draft
Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property "Community
Corridor", and the proposed use designation encourages mix of
residential, office, public, open space and commercial uses.
She further stated this particular area has transitioned and
it is anticipated that frontage properties within proximity
to the I-95 Corridor will develop for commercial uses.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
There being no one to address the request, the public hearing
was closed.
Ms. Jaeckle stated the proposed uses are consistent with the
development pattern along this section of the Route 10
corridor.
Ms. Jaeckle then made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for
the Board to approve Case 11SN0247 and accept the following
proffered condition:
Uses shall be limited to those permitted by right or with
restrictions in the General Industrial (I-2) District plus
the following uses:
(a)' Schools - commercial, trade, vocational and training
(b) Recreational establishments, commercial-indoor
(c) Repair shops
(d) Feed, seed, and ice sales
(e) Motor vehicle sales, service, repair and rental,
excluding motor vehicle consignment lots, provided that:
(i) such use shall be limited to motorcycles
(ii) all service, repair and storage of such vehicles,
to include those awaiting repair, shall occur
inside the building(s). Any outside display of such
vehicles for sale or rent shall not be continuous;
shall be located under a covered walkway; and shall
not obstruct pedestrian access.
(f) Appliance stores
(g) Bicycle sales and rentals
(h) Motor vehicle accessory stores
(i) Paint and wallpaper stores
(j) Rental of health and party equipment and small home
hardware
(k) Schools - music, dance and business.
J
J
J
11-558
(1) Sporting good sales
(m) Bakery goods sales
(n) Book, stationary, newspaper or magazine store
o) Restaurants, to include carry-out, but not fast food
(p) Medical and dental laboratories
(q) Medical facilities or clinics
(r) Photography studio (P)
(Staff Notes: A. Uses underlines represent uses not included
with Case 085N0197.
B. with approval of this request, this
Proffered Condition supersedes Proffered Condition 1 of Case
085N0197.)
Ayes: warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
18. PUBLIC HEARINGS
18.A. TO CONSIDER A REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A TEN-FOOT RIGHT OF
WAY DESIGNATED AS 6415 IRON BRIDGE ROAD
Mr. Harmon stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider a request to
quitclaim a ten-foot right of way designated as 6415 Iron
Bridge Road.
Ms. Carrie Coyner, representing the property owner, stated
the existing land owned by the county has made it impossible
for the owner to establish any road frontage. She further
stated the owner wishes to have marketable title to her
property.
Mr. warren called for public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Holland made a motion, seconded by Mr. Warren, for the
Board to authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to
vacate a 10' right of way designated as 6415 Iron Bridge
Road. (It is noted a copy of the vicinity sketch is filed
with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
11-559
18.B. TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY CODE RELATING
TO ELECTRONIC MESSAGE CENTERS AND RECEIVE PUBLIC
COMMENT ON THE ELECTRONIC MESSAGE CENTER SIGN POLICY
Mr. Greg Allen stated this date and time has been advertised
for a public hearing for the Board to consider an amendment
to the County Code relating to electronic message centers and
receive public comment on the electronic message center sign
policy. He stated staff completed an analysis on whether or
not the software that controls the operation of EMC signs
could somehow be locked so they would operate only as the
Board of Supervisors would approve. He further stated by
March 2011, staff had reached a consensus with the Planning
Commission that the EMC industry does not have affective
locking mechanisms to control EMC signs. In regards to
enforcement of EMC signs, he stated staff does a good job
monitoring and enforcing the 17 EMC approved signs within the
county. He further stated there are weaknesses within the
ordinance that could be improved with better language that
strengthens enforcement. He stated the ordinance amendments
recommended by the Commission provide two primary benefits,
1) violations would be rectified in 24 hours, not 10 days as
the ordinance currently allows; and 2) the proposed
amendments would allow staff to suspend the use of an EMC
sign if necessary, by repeat offenders. In regards to the
Planning Commission's recommendations to update the EMC sign
policy, he stated the changes include: 1) deleting the 2000
foot spacing requirement between EMC signs with a message
interval of 30 seconds; 2) allowing three lines of copy
instead of two; 3) delete the limitation on color; 4) change
the current message interval from 10 seconds to 30 seconds;
5) adding a prohibition to sequential messaging; 6) add a
requirement for EMC signs to be incorporated into an
architecturally-designed sign that is compatible with the
building that it serves; 7) adding a requirement that limits
the brightness of EMC signs above ambient light conditions;
and 8) within the Villages of Midlothian, Chester, Bon Air
and Ettrick as well as portions of the Corridor for
Courthouse Road, Hopkins Road, Route 10 and all of the Hull
Street Road Corridor, revising the prohibition against any
type of EMC sign except allowing consideration for
residential/commercial mixed-use developments that lack
visibility for tenants to a major arterial.
In response to Mr. Warren's question, Mr. Allen stated
currently there would not be any EMC sign allowed within the
area of Route 288 to Harbour Pointe, along the Hull Street
Corridor.
Mr. Stegmaier noted under the proposal it is only allowed in
that particular corridor where there is residential/
commercial mixed use.
Mr. Allen stated the consideration is only for
residential/commercial mixed-use developments that lack
visibility for tenants with major arterial frontage.
In response to Mr. Holland's question, Mr. Allen stated
currently portions of Route 10 are prohibited.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's concerns regarding the
restrictions of 24-hour notification, Mr. Allen stated there
J
J
J
11-560
were no issues regarding the time limit at the Planning
Commission meeting.
Ms. Jaeckle stated the proposed time limit seems to be very
restrictive.
In response to Ms. Durfee's question, Mr. Allen stated the
tenant would be granted 10 days to resolve a sign violation
if the ordinance amendment is approved and within 24 hours of
notification the owner could remedy the problem or turn the
sign off completely.
In regards to the notification of sign violations, Mr. Gecker
stated EMC's are being added into the existing enforcement
provisions.
In response to Mr. Warren's question, Mr. Allen stated in
regards to notifying the user of violations the 24 hour time
limitation usually begins when the user is notified.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
Ms. Leiss van der Linden-Brusse, a volunteer with the
Chesterfield Historical Society of Virginia, requested that
the Board exempt the Courthouse Historic District, the
historic Village sections of Bon Air, Ettrick and Matoaca and
the historic sections of Route 1 from any inclusion of
regulation of permitting the future installation of
electronic signs. She further stated electronic signs will
destroy the historic integrity of Chesterfield County's
unique heritage.
Mr. Peppy Jones requested that the Board maintain the current
provisions and prohibitions. He expressed concerns regarding
EMC's in Villages and stated EMC's will destroy the
historical value of the county.
Ms. Carrie Coyner, representing owners in the Chester Village
Festival Park mixed-use area, stated businesses that are not
visible to main roadways are competing with large area
business chains. She further stated revenue would likely
increase in these internal communities if an electric message
center was installed.
Mr. Freddy Boiuseau recommended approval of the proposed
ordinance amendments. He stated some regulations may need to
be addressed in the future.
Mr. Mark James, Chairman of the Chesterfield Chamber of
Commerce, stated the Chamber requests that the Board approve
the Planning Commission's recommendations on the EMC Policy
and EMC code amendment as submitted and without further
revision.
Mr. Paul Grasewicz stated he supports the proposed ordinance
amendments. He further stated the proposal is a good
compromise between the business community and the general
public. He recommended additional amendments to the policy in
regards to maintaining historic structures and protecting the
historical integrity of the county.
Mr. Stacey Bolton, Manager of Ironbridge Sports Park, stated
their electronic sign generates revenue for their business.
11-561
He expressed concerns regarding the 30 second timing
interval.
Mr. John Grohusky, on behalf of Bexley West Community
Association, stated prohibition should be continued in the
Villages and along the Hull Street Road Corridor between
Courthouse Road to Chippenham Parkway. He stated the 30
second timing interval is less of a distraction to motorists.
Mr. Anil Patel stated electronic signs are a tremendous help
specifically to businesses with low visibility from the main
road. He stated he supports the proposed changes, although he
believes additional changes may need to be made in the
future.
In response to Mr. Warren's question, Mr. Allen stated
current businesses with existing EMC's are not affected by
the proposed changes to the policy. He further stated the
ordinance amendments related to code enforcement could impact
an existing sign.
Ms. Jo Trout, President of Surrywood Civic Association, asked
the Board to adopt the 30-second message interval, prohibit
electronic signs in the distinctive, historic Villages, the
Courthouse Area Design District and on Hull Street Road
between ChippenYiam and Courthouse Road.
Ms. Andrea Epps requested that the Board support the
proposal. She further stated in some residential/commercial
mixed-use developments that lack visibility for tenants to a
major arterial road, one sign that includes all tenants as
long as the architecture is compatible, would be better than
individual signs.
Mr. Allen Twedt stated electronic message signs become
beneficial when promoting the activities and services of a
business to generate revenue. He expressed concerns regarding
the proposed timing interval.
Mr. Bill Levitt, President of the Greater Southport Business
Association, recommended approval of the proposed ordinance.
Mr. Bob Olsen stated he supports the 30-second timing
interval and most of the proposed changes. He expressed
concerns regarding spacing between signs and consideration
for residential/commercial mixed-use developments.
Mr. Bob Schrum stated the majority of the business community
supports the proposed changes. He requested that the Board
approve the proposed amendments.
Mr. David Stevens commended staff on the recommendations and
stated the proposal is beneficial to local businesses. He
asked the Board to approve the amendments.
Mr. Dick Page expressed concerns regarding preservation of
the historical sites within the county.
Mr. David Kochheiser, representing Southside Church of the
Nazarene, recommended support of the proposed changes.
J
J
J
11-562
Mr. Brennen Keene stated the proposed policy recommendations
create an opportunity for outreach community services to
promote a positive message to the public.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Ms. Jaeckle stated she can support the 30 second timing
interval because the messaging appears to look like a
standard sign. She further stated a balance of reality needs
to be created in regards to the Villages. She stated the
current policy enables businesses to promote their services.
She further stated small businesses cannot exist without
advertisement on the roadways.
Mr. Holland expressed appreciation to the speakers who
presented their arguments. He stated small businesses create
the bulk of the jobs in our economy. He further stated he is
proud to promote a balance between the business community and
the general public. He noted that he can support the proposed
amendments to the policy suggested by Mr. Grasewicz.
Ms. Durfee stated she is very pleased that people can come
together, despite differing opinions, to gain a balanced
approach. She further stated changes have been made to
preserve historical areas in the county, while allowing
flexibility to other areas that need to promote business. She
stated she can support prohibiting the Village areas,
particularly the Courthouse Area and Hull Street Road
Corridor between Courthouse Road to Chippenham Parkway. She
further stated a part of Hull Street off Route 288 is a very
dangerous intersection.
Mr. Gecker stated he does not believe in the presence of
electronic message signs and their "ability" to bring in new
business. He further stated he cannot think of a retail area
in America with a prevalence of electronic message center
signs. He stated it is beneficial to maintain the historic
quality of the county. He stated the majority of associations
that he met with were not in support of electronic message
centers. He noted the majority of the citizens in favor of
the proposal are Chester residents. He further stated he
would like to exclude the Village Districts and portions of
Midlothian Turnpike where visibility and attractiveness are a
priority. He expressed concerns regarding the placement of
EMC's in front of every establishment and church in the
county.
Mr. Warren stated he was impressed by the amount of input
from both sides regarding the issue. He further stated the
exempt areas would still be allowed consideration for signage
in the future. He expressed concerns regarding the
requirement of spacing between electronic message signs. He
also expressed concerns regarding areas of Brandermill
through Harbour Pointe and stated this particular area is
extremely congested and hazardous. He requested prohibition
off Route 288 on Hull Street to the Harbour Pointe Parkway.
Ms. Durfee made a motion; seconded by Mr. Holland, for the
Board to approve the proposed policy recommendations and
include areas to prohibit electronic message center signs
within the Village Districts (Midlothian, Chester, Bon Air
and Ettrick), within the Chesterfield County Courthouse
11-563
complex, within the Midlothian area east and west service
districts, within the Hull Street Road Corridor between
Courthouse Road to Chippenham Parkway, and within the
Courthouse Road and Hull Street/Route 288 area by Harbour
Pointe, and approve the spacing requirement between
electronic message signs of 1000 feet.
Ms. Jaeckle made a friendly amendment to Ms. Durfee's
original motion for Chester Village to remain prohibited
except to allow consideration for residential/commercial
mixed-use developments that lack visibility for tenants to a
major arterial .
Ms. Durfee accepted Ms. Jaeckle's friendly amendment.
In response to Ms. Jaeckle's question regarding the Historic
Districts, Ms. Durfee stated those currently protected are
the Villages of Midlothian, Chester, Bon Air and Ettrick and
the County Courthouse Complex.
Mr. Warren called for a vote on Ms. Durfee's motion, seconded
by Mr. Holland, for the Board to approve the proposed policy
recommendations and include areas to prohibit electronic
message center signs within the Village Districts
(Midlothian, Chester, Bon Air and Ettrick), except to allow
consideration for residential/commercial mixed-use
development in Chester Village that lack viability for
tenants to a major arterial, within the Chesterfield County
Courthouse complex, within the Midlothian area east and west
of the service district, within the Hull Street Road Corridor
between Courthouse Road to Chippenham Parkway, and within the
Courthouse Road and Hull Street/Route 288 area by Harbour
Pointe, and further recommended the spacing requirement
between electronic message signs to include 1000 feet.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
On motion of Mr. Gecker, seconded by Ms. Durfee, the Board
adopted the following ordinance, as submitted:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING
AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 19-5 AND 19-633
RELATING TO ELECTRONIC MESSAGE CENTERS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Sections 19-5 and 19-633 of the Code of the County
of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and re-enacted
to read as follows:
Sec. 19-5. Enforcement.
000
(6) If the director of planning determines that any person
has violated this chapter or failed to comply with any
condition of a zoning or development approval, then he
shall serve upon that person a notice to comply by
either:
J
J
J
11-564
a. Delivering the notice to the person by hand; or
b. Mailing the notice by first class mail to the last
known address of the person.
The notice shall set forth the nature of the violation
or failure to comply. Upon failure of the person to
remedy the violation, comply with the condition or
receive an extension within ten days after the date of
delivery or mailing of the notice, the person shall be
subject to the penalties set forth above. With respect
to violations or failures to comply involving portable
signs, electronic message center signs, or the parking
or display of motor vehicles, the person shall remedy
the violation or comply with the condition within 24
hours of service of the notice or receive an extension,
or the person shall be subject to the penalties above.
000
Sec. 19-633. General regulations.
The following regulations apply to all signs, whether or
not a sign permit is required, and are in addition to the
regulations contained elsewhere in this article:
000
(b) A county sign permit is required for all signs in
excess of eight square feet in area, unless
otherwise provided in this chapter. A separate sign
permit is required for all electronic .message
center (EMC) signs.
000
(d) An application for a sign permit shall contain:
000
(5) An EMC sign permit application shall include
documentation of a designated electrical
control box servicing only the EMC, and
documentation of the photocell providing an
automatic change of the illuminative
brightness between sunset and sunrise.
(6) Information regarding other signs
demonstrating compliance with the requirements
of subsection (h) of this section; and
(7) The filing fee.
000
(i) Anytime the holder of an EMC permit receives two
(2) notices of violation within 12 months, the
director of planning can suspend the EMC sign
permit for a period of up to thirty (30) days. If
the EMC permit holder receives any other notices of
violation within 12 months of the end of the
suspension period, the director of planning can
suspend the EMC sign permit for a period of up to
thirty (30) days for each additional violation.
11-565
During suspension of the permit, the EMC sign shall
be disconnected from electric power.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
Ms. Jaeckle expressed appreciation to Mr. Grasewicz for his
diligence writing letters and making phone calls related to
the issue.
18.C. TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY CODE RELATING
TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BONDING
Ms. Rogers stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider an amendment to
the County Code relating to landscape maintenance bonding.
She further stated as directed by the Board of Supervisors,
the Planning Commission held a public hearing on a proposed
code amendment relating to landscape maintenance bonding. She
stated the current ordinance requires a developer to post
surety, for a one-year period from initial occupancy, in an
amount equal to fifty percent of the installation cost to
cover the replacement of required landscaping which becomes
unhealthy, is dying, dies or has been pollarded. She stated
surety is not required for landscaping that has an initial
cost of $1000 or less. She noted the development community
indicated that very few local bonding agencies meet the
requirements. She stated this amendment would continue to
require the posting of a one-year surety, but allow, at the
developer's option, submission of a guarantee from the
landscape contractor and property owner that any required
landscaping which becomes unhealthy, is dying, dies or has
been pollarded within the first year of planting will be
replaced. She stated in the instance of a warranty, should a
contractor or property owner default, code enforcement can be
used to bring a site into compliance as is done with
landscaping issues beyond the initial year time period. She
noted the Planning Commission suggested that the Board may
wish to consider directing staff to evaluate the bonding
requirements. She further noted staff concurs with the
proposed ordinance amendment.
Mr. Warren called for public comment.
Mr. Brennen Keene, on behalf of the Chesterfield County
Chamber of Commerce, stated he supports the ordinance
amendment and believes the changes can be beneficial to the
development community.
Mr. Anil Patel stated eliminating the bonds will help the
business community and reduce costs. He further stated
landscape contractors usually warranty all materials for a
one year time period.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, the public
hearing was closed.
Mr. Gecker stated the proposal to allow the guarantee rather
than the bond is reasonable. He further stated he can support
a substitute for the bonding requirement. He directed staff
to evaluate the policy to gain understanding.
J
J
J
11-566
Mr. Gecker made a motion, seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, for the
Board to adopt the ordinance as proposed.
In response to Mr. Holland's question, Ms. Rogers stated the
ordinance amendment only pertains to a site that develops not
to an individual homeowner, whether it be a residential site,
residential subdivision or commercial site. She further
stated where landscaping is required, fifty percent of the
cost has to be bonded for one year.
Ms. Russell elaborated on the A rating and VII size in
regards to bonding from an insurance company.
Mr. Holland requested clarity in regards to the rating. He
expressed concerns about the impact on future homeowners and
their protection. He directed staff to compile historic data
relative to proposed changes.
Ms. Durfee stated the amendment applies to both residential
and commercial. She expressed concerns regarding residential
and developer obligations which may burden the homeowner. She
also expressed concerns relative to encumbering staff. She
further stated the current system works just fine and the
proposal is not purposeful at this time. She also directed
staff to evaluate the policy to gain further understanding.
Ms. Rogers stated the proposed ordinance amendment would
apply to both residential and non-residential. With respect
to residential, she further stated the bonding only applies
to landscaping from the date it is installed for a period of
one year to ensure that if that landscaping dies, it will be
replaced. She stated the ordinance will allow the developer
to post the bond or provide a warranty from the property
owner, who is the developer of the subdivision, and the
landscape contractor who will ensure if the landscaping dies
within the first year, it will be restored. She noted
landscape contractors usually warranty all materials for a
one-year time period. She also noted the requirement of 100
percent assurance on the contractor's side still remains in
place.
Discussion ensued relative to the purpose of bonding
requirements.
Ms. Jaeckle stated elimination of this small cost would help
developers and they should not have to pay for a bond when
there is already a warranty on the landscaping.
Ms. Durfee stated the proposed amendment would give
developers a choice between the warranty option and the bond.
She expressed concerns relative to burdening the citizens
neighborhood associations and the county to ensure that
communities are protected by original development proposals
of landscaping. She stated she understands the commercial
aspect because of the larger bonding cost, but the
residential bonding is not a high cost, and the county has
not had a problem with it.
Ms. Rogers clarified that the bond is released after a year
if the landscape is alive.
Ms. Durfee stated there is no one here from the development
community, so she does not see it as a pressing issue.
11-567
Discussion ensued relative to the number and amount of the
bonds posted between 2005 and 2010.
Ms. Jaeckle again expressed concerns relative to double
warranty.
Mr. Holland stated his concern for the residential homeowner.
Mr. Gecker stated since residential bonds would be smaller
than commercial bonds, the risk would be minimal in regard to
residential projects.
Ms. Durfee stated the only way to hold developers to their
obligations is through bonding.
Mr. Warren called for a vote, on the motion of Mr. Gecker,
seconded by Ms. Jaeckle, for the Board to adopt the ordinance
as proposed.
Ms. Durfee made a substitute motion for the Board to adopt
the ordinance for commercial development and not residential.
Mr. Holland seconded Ms. Durfee's substitute motion.
Mr. Mincks stated the provisions pertain to site plans, not
subdivision plans.
Mr. Gecker stated the goal is to reduce the cost of
developing in the county, whether it is residential or
commercial. He further stated he does not agree with the idea
there will be additional work for staff to maintain.
Ms. Jaeckle stated there is no supplementary risk placed on
businesses or the homeowner.
Ms. Durfee expressed concerns regarding a lack of
representation from the citizenry.
Mr. Warren called for a vote on the motion of Ms. Durfee,
seconded by Mr. Holland for the Board to adopt the following
ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING
SECTION 19-518 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BONDS.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 19-518 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to
read as follows:
Chapter 19
ZONING
0 0 0
02-ARTICLE VII. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MANUAL
0 0 0
SUBDIVISION III. LANDSCAPING
J
J
J
11-568
0 0 0
DIVISION 1. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
0 0 0
Secs. 19-518. Plant material specifications.
0 0 0
(e) Maintenance:
(i) The owner or his agent shall be responsible for
the maintenance, repair and replacement of all
required landscaping materials. All plant material
shall be tended and maintained in a healthy growing
condition and free from refuse and debris at all
times. All landscaped areas shall be provided with a
readily available water supply; except that in I-2
or I-3 districts, a readily available water supply
shall only be required in the setback along any
public right-of-way, which accommodates or is
intended to accommodate through traffic. Any of the
following options may be used to eliminate part or
all of the requirement for water availability to
plant materials:
(1) Using plants specified as having a low water
need in the Chesterfield County Plant
Materials List,
(2) Plants located in stormwater management or BMP
facilities, and/or
(3) Provide a continuous maintenance, watering,
and replacement program for plant materials
with a reputable landscape maintenance company
for a minimum of three years. Prior to the end
of a year after completion of landscaping,
each site shall be inspected by the planning
department to verify that existing and/or new
landscaping is in a healthy growing condition.
All unhealthy, dying or dead plant materials
or pollarded trees shall be replaced during
the next planting season.
(ii) Maintenance responsibilities of required street
trees within a subdivision shall be specified on the
final check plan and record plat to be the
responsibility of the homeowners association. Street
trees shall not be removed during or after
residences are constructed.- Trees removed shall be
replaced with a like species and in a size
comparable to the original planting.
(f) Installation and bonding requirements:
(1) All landscaping shall be installed in
accordance with professionally accepted
landscaping practices and procedures.
Landscaped areas shall be protected from
vehicular encroachment by such means as, but
11-569
not limited to, wheel stops, concrete curbs or
bituminous curbs.
(2)
A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued
until either:
(i) the required landscaping is completed in
accordance with the approved landscape plan.
or
(ii) a form of surety satisfactory to the
director of planning has been submitted in an
amount equal to the costs of completing the
required landscaping. This requirement shall
not preclude the phasing of landscape
installation as may be approved by the
director of planning.
(3) If surety has been submitted, required
landscaping shall be installed by the first
planting season following date of issuance of
the surety or the surety may be forfeited to
the county.
(4) (a) For property subject to site plan review,
to insure replacement of unhealthy, dying,
dead or pollarded landscaping within the first
year of installation for sites where the cost
of required landscaping is more than $1000
(based on a landscape contractor's estimate
satisfactory to the director of planning), one
of the following shall be accomplished:
(i) A form of surety, satisfactory to the
director of planning in an amount equal to
fifty (50) percent of the cost of initial
installation of required landscaping shall be
submitted to the Planning Department prior to
the Planning Department's approval to
occupy the site.;or
(ii) The landscaper and the property owner
shall provide a guarantee, in a form
acceptable to the director of planning, to
replace such landscaping within the first year
of installation. Any transfer of property
ownership shall be subject to the guarantee.
(b) For property subject to subdivision plan
review, to insure replacement of unhealthy,
dying, dead or pollarded landscaping within
the first year of installation for sites where
the cost of required landscaping is more than
$1000 (based on a landscape contractor's
estimate satisfactory to the director of
planning), a form of surety, satisfactory to
the director of planning, in an amount equal
to fifty (50) percent of the cost of initial
installation of required landscaping, shall be
submitted to the Planning Department.
000
J
J
J
11-570
(h) Street trees:
During the site and subdivision construction plan
review processes, and for a TND project during the
overall development plan review process, required
street trees shall be shown including species and
caliper, and submitted to, and approved by, the
director of planning and VDOT.
000
000
(2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon adoption.
Ayes: Warren, Holland, Durfee.
Nays: Gecker and Jaeckle.
18.D. TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY CODE RELATING
TO THE ENCROACHMENT OF STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AND BEST
MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FACILITIES INTO BUFFERS
Ms. Rogers stated this date and time has been advertised for
a public hearing for the Board to consider an amendment to
the County Code relating to the encroachment of storm water
management and best management practice facilities into
buffers. She further stated currently, the Ordinance
prohibits such encroachments unless approved by the Planning
Commission during plan review. She stated the proposed
amendment would allow administrative approval of an
encroachment provided it is staff's determination that the
encroachment will not violate the spirit and intent of the
required buffer. She stated the ordinance allows an appeal of
the administrative decision to the Planning Commission
without the necessity to pay an appeal fee. She further
stated an aggrieved person, such as an adjacent property
owner, would still be able to have their concerns addressed
by the Planning Commission should they so desire. She further
stated the Planning Commission recommended denial of the
amendment, indicating that the current process allows a
developer to seek reduction of required buffers from the
Commission through the plans review process and affords those
impacted by such a proposal immediate consideration through
the public process, rather than an appeal procedure as
suggested through the amendment.
Mr. Warren called for. public comment.
There being no one to speak to the issue, the public hearing
was closed.
In response to Mr. Gecker's question, Ms. Rogers stated the
Planning Commission cannot initiate an appeal as the
ordinance is currently written.
Mr. Gecker recommended the proposal be remanded back to the
Planning Commission with the idea of contemplating a process
by which the Commission could also have input.
Mr. Holland directed staff to compile figures in regards to
residential fees.
11-571
Ms. Durfee concurred with Mr. Gecker's comments.
Mr. Gecker made a motion, seconded by Ms. Durfee, for the
Board to remand the proposal back to the Planning Commission
with the direction to study the possibility of Commission
intervention in the process of siting BMPs within buffers.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
19. REMAINING MANUFACTURED HOME PERMITS AND ZONING REQUESTS
There were no remaining requests for manufactured home
permits and zoning requests.
20. FIFTEEN-MINUTE CITIZEN COMMENT PERIOD ON UNSCHEDULED
MATTERS
There were no requests to address the. Board at this time.
21. ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Ms. Durfee, seconded by Mr. Warren, the Board
adjourned at 9:30 p.m. until October 12, 2011 at 3:00 p.m.
Ayes: Warren, Jaeckle, Holland, Durfee and Gecker.
Nays: None.
~?,C4
ame St maier
County Administrator
Arthur S. Warren
Chairman
11-572
J
J
J