Loading...
12SN0113 CASE MANAGER: Darla Orr September 20, 2011 CPC October 26, 2011 BS November 30, 2011 BS STAFF’S BS Time Remaining: REQUEST ANALYSIS 330 days AND RECOMMENDATION 12SN0113 Emmett Burton, IV Matoaca Magisterial District 5206 Thornwood Court REQUEST: Conditional use approval to permit the parking of a commercial vehicle incidental to a dwelling in a Residential (R-88) District. PROPOSED LAND USE: Parking of a commercial vehicle (flat bed wrecker) on the request property is proposed. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON PAGE 2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend denial for the following reasons: A. The proposed land use does not conform to the Southern and Western Area Plan, which suggests the property is appropriate for residential use of 1-5 acre lots; suited to R-88 zoning. B. The proposed land use is not representative of or compatible with existing and anticipated area development. (NOTE: CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED OR THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) MAY PROFFER CONDITIONS. CONDITIONS NOTED WITH “CPC” ARE CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.) Ю±ª·¼·²¹ ¿ Ú×ÎÍÌ ÝØÑ×ÝÛ ½±³³«²·¬§ ¬¸®±«¹¸ »¨½»´´»²½» ·² °«¾´·½ ­»®ª·½» PROFFERED CONDITIONS (CPC) 1. This conditional use shall be granted to Emmett Burton, IV exclusively and shall not be transferred or run with the land. (P) (CPC) 2. This conditional use shall be limited to the parking of the commercial vehicle (flat bed wrecker) only and shall not permit storage of disabled, wrecked or junked vehicles on the commercial vehicle or on the property. (P) (CPC) 3. Parking of the commercial vehicle shall only be permitted in the parking area identified on Exhibit A, dated September 20, 2011 or within a fully enclosed garage structure. (P) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: The request property is located on the north line of Thornwood Court, west of Thornwood Lane and better known as 5206 Thornwood Court. Tax ID 786-628-8303. Existing Zoning: R-88 Size: 1.5 acres Existing Land Use: Single-family residential Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North - A and R-88; Single-family residential South, East and West - R-88; Single-family residential or vacant UTILITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL; FIRE AND COUNTY TRANSPORTATION This request will have a minimal impact these facilities. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT): VDOT notes that an existing private entrance to/from public right-of-way for the Burton property is to remain unaltered. VDOT has no further comment. î ïîÍÒðïïíóÒÑÊíðóÞÑÍóÎÐÌ LAND USE Current Comprehensive Plan: The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Southern and Western Area Plan, which suggests the property is appropriate for residential use of 1-5 acre lots; suited to R-88 zoning. Draft Comprehensive Plan: The Revised Draft Comprehensive Plan (as of September 2011) designates the subject property “Countryside Residential Area.” This proposed land use designation encourages single-family residential and limited agricultural, forestal, open space and public uses.It should be noted that the revised draft plan is pending review by the Planning Commission, has not been approved, and does not provideland use guidance for the subject property at this time. As of the date of this report, the Commission has not forwarded a recommendation regarding the revised draft plan to the Board of Supervisors. Additionally, the Board has not reviewed the revised draft plan, nor has the Board taken any action on the revised draft plan to date. The recommendations of the revised draft plan are provided for reference purposes only. Area Development Trends: The area is characterized by residential zoning and single-family residential uses on larger parcels. It is anticipated that single-family residential use will continue in the area as suggested by the Plan. Use: The applicant parks a commercial vehicle (flat bed wrecker) on the request property. He has indicated that he drives the truck for his employment with a local company that contracts with motorist clubs and local and state police to provide motorist assistance. The Zoning Ordinance permits the parking of commercial vehicles in a residential area as a by right use provided the vehicle does not exceed 10,000 pounds, does not have more than two (2) axles and does not tow or haul disabled, wrecked or junked vehicles. While the vehicle driven by the applicant only has two (2) axles, it is used to haul disabled, wrecked or junked vehicles and weighs approximately 11,500 pounds. The applicant is requesting conditional use approval to permit the parking of the wrecker. Proffered Conditions would limit approval to the applicant only and would prohibit disabled, wrecked or junked vehicles to be stored on the wrecker or on the property. (Proffered Conditions 1 and 2) Parking Area: In order to minimize visibility of the vehicle from adjacent properties and the public right of way, the applicant has proffered to only park the vehicle in the rear yard as shown on Exhibit A dated September 20, 2011 or within a fully enclosed garage structure. (Proffered Condition 3) í ïîÍÒðïïíóÒÑÊíðóÞÑÍóÎÐÌ CONCLUSION The proposed land use does not conform to the recommendations of the Southern and Western Area Plan which suggests the property is appropriate for residential use on one (1) to five (5) acre lots, suited for R-88 zoning. In addition, the proposed land use is not representative of, and compatible with, existing and anticipated area development. Given these considerations, denial of this request is recommended. CASE HISTORY Applicant (9/20/11): To address concerns of the Matoaca District Commissioner, the applicant modified Exhibit A to identify that the parking area for the commercial vehicle will be directly behind the dwelling. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Planning Commission Meeting (9/20/11): The applicant accepted the recommendation. There was no opposition present. Mr. Bass stated that since the applicant will park the vehicle directly behind the house, the use would not be an intrusion to the neighborhood. He added the applicant provides a service to the public. On motion of Mr. Bass, seconded by Dr. Brown, the Commission recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions on page 2. AYES: Messrs. Bass, Brown, Gulley, Hassen and Waller. Board of Supervisors’ Meeting (10/26/11): On their own motion, the Board deferred this case to their November 30, 2011 public hearing. Staff (10/27/11): The applicant was advised in writing that any significant, new or revised information should be submitted no later than October 31, 2011 for consideration at the Board’s November 30, 2011 public hearing. ì ïîÍÒðïïíóÒÑÊíðóÞÑÍóÎÐÌ Staff (11/01/11): To date, no new information has been received. The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday November 30, 2011 beginning at 6:30 p.m. will take under consideration this request. ë ïîÍÒðïïíóÒÑÊíðóÞÑÍóÎÐÌ 12SN0113-1