03-23-77 Minutes476
Mr. 3~ne~ Zook, C~%ief, C0u~rehensive Flng.
Vzs. Girone welcc~es Mr. Dean Martin, Couuny Nursing Home Administrator, to las first Board
meeting, Mr, >l~rt~% States that he would like approval of reutiog on a 3 year lee~e a Burroughs
L9900 for the Nerving Home ~hich will cost $815 per month, maintenance being iucluded, soft.re
in ths anount of $2,000 wkiah is a one time cost mud could be delivered by the middle of ~y.
salar~ will range from $14,232 - $18,936.
for the purpose of defining trepass by animals and prc~idin~ for a p~al~y be advertised for a
Fr, %ook i~troduces ~. Jeffrey O'Dell who preseats a $1idepresentation of the historical sites
he has recorded in Chesterfield County. He states the book the Board authorized should help
citizens and others identi~y the historical sites an~ hopefully ~ill stin~ate than to preserve
these sites. He states that t~ ~a$ ~horo~ghly enjoyed working in Chesterfield aa~ feel~ t~s
County has the most to offer of those in which he has ~rked. He states that 600 entries have
been recorded, including sites and buildings as well. Mrs. Knoop inquires where the negatives
of these pictures will be kept. Mr. O'Dell states at the Virginia State Library. Mrs. Knoop
states that there are some groups in Chesterfield working on historic sites and suggests that
perhaps they could have a meeting and v~rk together on this project and suggest others that could
be investigated. Mrs. Girone asks Mr. O'Dell to investigate the possibility of using color
pohtographs in the historical bOok that he will be working on. The Board and the Planning
Department thank Mr. O'Dell for his professionalism and expertise in carrying out this project.
Mr. O'Dell adds that the information filled out for each site will be going to the Virginia
Historic Landmarks but one copy will be given to the County.
Mr. Dexter Williams states that the C~,~unity Development Depart~nent has been investigating
eight possible sites for park and ride lots in the County with the VDHT, RRPDC and the GRTC.
He adds the sites chosen to be studied should not have the opposition as the site in Bon Air
did. He states that a n~del bas been ccmpleted end GRTC is currently studying this to see if
it is reasonable and then VDHT will also review the model. He states a recon~nendation should
be before the Board in two months regarding the park and ride lots. Mr. Bookman states he ~uld
like a total picture regarding the ccnrmitment of the County, the subsidy if any, what ~ould
happen if this program failed, etc. Mr. Williams states he will have all this information
available at the time of the reccranendation.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by bk. Bookman, it is resolved that the ~Iighway Department
be and it hereby is requested to accept the roads in Salisbury, Hillcrest Section, into the
State Secondary System of Roads.
SALISBURY, HILLCREST SECTICN
Brigstock Road - beginning at Brigstock Road, State Route
1014, thence horth and east 0n 12 mile to the western
intersection of Whitechapel Road, thence east 0.03 mile
to the eastern intersection of Whitechapel Road, thence
east 0.10 mile to a dead end.
~'~nitechapel Road - beginning at its western intersection
~'ith Erigstock Road, thence north 0.06 mile, thence north
0.21 mile to Vistapoint Road, beginning at its eastern
intersection with Brigstock Road, thence north 0.07 mile.
~istapQint Road - beginn/ng at Whitechapel Road, thence
westerly 0.16 mile to a cul-de-sac, beginning at Whitechapel
Road, thence easterly 0.23 mile to a cul-de-sac.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, I,~. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and }.k. Dodd.
0.25 mile
0.34 ~&le
0.39 mile
Mr. Jim Zook states the Board asked departments to plan ahead and prepare a Capital ImDrovmnent
Program which would cover approximately a 6 year period. He adds that some complete b~ckground
work should be done on this program and suggests ~ sevd_nar be made available to all department
heads and their representatives with special emphasis and possible requirement of participation
for those departments directly involved in the development of the CIP. He states this would
involve approximately 25 people and should be 1~-2 day seminar with another day a month later
to help the individual departments. He adds this would be eligible for HUD funds and he bas
spoken with an instructor from VPI/~SU who would conduct this seminar. After further discussion
of this matter, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that a CIP
seminar be held for all department heads and their representatives with special emphasis and
possible requirement of participation for those departments directly involved in the development
of the CIP.
Ayes: b{r. O'~eill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Bookman and ~k. Dodd.
On motion of l~r. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, it is resolved that the Director of Comnunity
Development be authorized to inform Hetra Corporation's representatives that the Board of
Supervisors specifically extends from Nov. 1, 1977, to May 1, 1978, the period within which
Hetra Corporation may exercise its Yights under the aforesaid Option Agreement and extends from
September 16, 1977, to March 16, 1978, the date on which Hetra Corporation must commence con-
struction pursuant to the aforesaid agreement in order to avoid repurchase by the County pur-
suant to Section E2(a) of the aforesaid restrictions.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, bk. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. ~bnuel states this tinm and date has been set for a public hearing on an amendment to the
Code of Chesterfield relating to personal property and real estate tax exer~ption for certified
pollution control equipment and facilities. There being no one present to speak in favor or
against the proposed ordinance, it is on motion of bk. Booknmn, seconded by ~rs. Girone, re-
solved that the following ordinance be and it hereby is adopted:
"An ordinance to amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1975, as mnended, by adding
Sections 8-14.1 and 8-33 relating to personal property and real estate tax exenzption for
certified pollution control eqpaipment and facilities."
BE IT oRDAII~ED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) That ~8-14.1 and 8-33 are added to the Code of the County of Chesterfield as follow, s:
Sec. 8-14.1 Exer~tion from tangible personal property taxes for certified pollution control
~quiPment and facilities. Certified pollution control equipment and facilities, as defined
by ~58-16.3 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, shall constitute a separate class of
personal property and shall be exempt frcm taxation as tangible personal property or machinery
478
and tools.
IE is on mo~ion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr, Bcokn~n, resolved that tbs follov~ng resoluti~
in t~ ~e~ s~ld be ~te ~d sh~ as~ t~t nhey r~l~te the~ ~iori~es,. ~.
Upon consideration of the budget for the year 1977-78, it is on motion of ~ks. Girorm, seconded
by }fr. Apperson, re~olv~d t~at the fo%lo~ Tax lev~es as advertised in ~he Richrcnd Tir~s
Disoatch on Febru~l~ 8, 1977, a~d Febzna~ry 14, 1977~ and in the t%~ogress Index on February 7,
1977, and Febxvary 14, 1977, be and ~hay hereby ara adopted~ which levies are for the yegr 1977
on each $100 assessed ~%d liable for such levies for ghe purpose of nmeting the requlr~ts
$1.12 $3.60 $1.00
1.12 3.60 1.00
Mr. Manuel states that this time and date have been set for a public hearing on an ordinance
relating to the Board of Equalization Assessments. There is no one present to speak in favor
or in opposition to this ordinance. It is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd
resolved that the following ordinance be and it hereby is adopted:
"An ordJ_nance to ammnd and reenact Section 8-3 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield,
1975, as amended, relating to the Board of Equalization of Assessments."
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:
(1) ~That §8-3 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield is amended and reenacted as
follows:
Sec. 8-3. Board of equalization of assessments.
Ail duties and all powers conferred by law in the review for equalization of assessments
of real estate in the county shall be exercised hy a county board of equalization of assessments,
ccrmposed of five members appointed for terms not to exceed one year and expiring on December
thirty-first of the year in which they are appointed by the Judge of the circuit court pursuant
to the provisions of section 58-898 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The Board of
Supervisors shall, in January of each year, by a resolution approved by a majority of all its
men~ers, direct the judge of the circuit court to make appropriate appointments to the Board
of Equalization of Assessments for the ensuing year. The Board shall also have the power to
review all assessments and cbanges of assessments previsoulymade by the assessor. The board
ofequalization of assessments shall have authority, on its own motion or upon protest as herein-
after provided, to change'any assessment of real estate in the county, to add to the tax rolls
any real estate erroneously c~nitted, to remove properties frcm tax rolls when acquired by owners
not subject to taxation, and to correct errors in tax assessment records, in accordance with the
policies and procedures prescribed in this article. Vacancies on the board of equalization~of
assessments shall be filled by the judge of the circuit court for the unexpired term. Such
board shall be r~novable by the judge of the circuit court for malfeasance, misfeasance or non-
feasance in office. The cc~pensation of the members of the board of equalization of assessments
shall be as prescribed in the' annual county budget as adopted by the board of supervisors.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Onm otion of Mrs. Girone, seconded byMr. Apperson, it is resolved that the reconmendations of
the Personnel and Salary Advisory Ccranittee be and they hereby are approved as recomm~edwith
the exception of itam#3 which was approved earlier in the meeting.
1. }~ental Health Chapter 10
a. Reclassify position of Assistant Administrator to Business Manager, Grade 16'
The Conmittee reconmended the position of Assistant Administcator be reclassified
to Business Manager, and that said classification be allocated to the County
Classification Plan at Grade 16. Action to be effective on Board approval.
2. Data Processing
a. Reclassify position of Consultant, Grade 26 to Administrative Assistant II,
Grade 22 and to retain the inctmbent on a permanent basis.
The Conmittee reco~L~nded that the position of Consultant be reclassified to
Administrative Assistant II, Grade 22; that the position be established as
a permanent authorization; that the incumbent be reclassified accordingly and
his salary be readjusted fr~n $21,912 to $16,440. This action to be effective
July 1, 1977.
3. Mental Health
a. Establish a Controller position and to initiate inmediate recruitmmnt to fill
the position.
The Conmittee reconnmnded:
a. That the position of Controller be established as a penrmnent authorization;
b. That the classification Controller be allocated to the County Classification
Plan at Grade 24;
c. That the PersonnelDepartment begin recruitment action onBoard approval.
4. General Services
a. Authorization to fill a 1977-78 position prior to July 1, 1977.'
The Comnittee recoranended that the the request for early fill of the Mechanic II
position be approved effective April 1, 1977.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, ~,~. Bookman and ~. Dodd.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded byMr. Apperson, it is resolved that this Board appropriates
$640 from the Unappropriated Surplus of the General Fund to 11-086-144.1, Capital Area Agency on
Aging Contribution, which contribution is the County's pro rata share for 1976.
Ayes: Mr. O~Neill, Mrs. Girone~ Mr.~Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
On motiono~ 'Mr. App~erson, seconded byMr. Bookman, it is resolved that a soi% engineer be
emp%oyed for ~he testing and inspection of the compacted structureal fill for the Chesterfield
CountyMental Health Clinic at a eost not~tdexceed $1,10Q.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr Bool~nanandMr. Dodd.
Be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County sitting in a regular meeting
on this the 23rd day of March, 1977, as follows:
Whereas, Leo H. Myers who resigned from t/%is Board on January 19, 1977, has rendered a valu-
able service to the people of ~Chesterfield County in general, and to the people of Bermuda
Magisterial District in psrticular through his energetic and forceful representation of them on
this Beard for over five years; and,
~ereas, it is the ~desire of this ~Board to recognize his faithful service and to spread this
recognition upon the rkinute book of the Board of S~Servisors of Chesterfield County~
Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that Cb_is Board extends on behalf of its members and tl%e
people of Chesterfield County their appreciation 3and gratitude to Leo H. Myers for his service as
a nmmber of the Board_ of S~pervisors and does ~'solicit his continued interest in the-affairs of
his district ~ and County in the years to come.
Be It. Further'Resolved that a copy~ of this resolution be presented no Mr. Myers and that thi~
resolution be permanently recorded 'among the papers of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
,__Ayes! Mr. O'Neill, 1.~s. Gir~one/Mr. ~ppe~son, Mr. Bookman a~d ~r~ D0dd.
I~r. Dodd and ~.~r. o'Neill state that Mr. ~zers did an outstanding job as supervisor from Bermuda
District and they cannot comprehend how he accomplished so much.
On nmtion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mrs. Girone, it is resolved that the following resolution
be and it hereby is adopted:
In keeping with its interesn in and concern for the total well being of young children, this
Board declares April 3-9, 1977 as the '5~eek of the Young Child."
This declaration designates a specific tiros for all of us to emphasize the importance of our
children and the necessity of their physical, social, educational and emotional development.
We further recognize the importance of the local agencies which render essential services to
children and families in our co~nnnity.
Ayes: ~{r. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. Manu~l gives a status report on the Bon Air Landfill.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that this Board adjourn
Executive Session to discuss legal matters within the jurisdiction of the County.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr~ Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Reconvening:
77S020
In ~iidlotbian Magisterial District, E.B.P. Corporation requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to
Residential (R-9) and (R-12) of a 377.9 acre parcel fronting 464.4 feet on Courthouse Road,
located approximately 1,300 feet south of its intersection with Berrand Read. Tax Map Sec. 26-12
(1) parcel 3, and 27-10 (1) parcel 5 (Sheets 7 & 8).
Mr. Bryce Powell is present representing E.B.P. Corporation. There being no opposition to this
request, it is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. A4~person, resolved that this request be
and it hereby is approved as shown on the revised preliminary plan prepared by J. K. Tinmons and
Associates and dated January 25, 1977.
Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
77S027
In Bermuda Magisterial District, F. G. Sloan & Sons, Inc. request an amendment of a previously
granted (case #76S023) Conditional Use to permit the construction of a second office building and
reduce the depth of the buffer to 25 feet. This request is in an Agricultural (A) District on a
2.39 acre parcel fronting approximately 225 feet on East Hundred Roadand being located approxi-
mately 1,200 feet west of its intersection withMaadowville Road and better known as Riverbend
Subdivision, S~c. A, Lots 13 and 14 and 116-12 (1) parcel 1-2 (Sheet 33).
No one was present representing the applicant but Mr. Balderson states that the applicant had agr~
to the condition recommended by the Planning Conmission. There being no opposition present to
this case, it is on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that~this request beand
it hereby is approved subject to ar~_nding condition ~2 of case number 76S023 to read as follows:
"This Conditional Use shall permit the erection and
operation of two office buildings exclusively, which will
be operated for business and professional use. This
Conditional Use will also be subject to a buffer area of
not less than 25 feet measured along the north, east
and west property lines."
Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. ·~person, Mr. Bookman and ~lr. Dodd.
77S032
In MidlothianMagisterial District, Robert E. Dunnington and J. Sherwood Strum request rezoning
from Residential (R-15) to Office Business (0) of a 0.25 acre parcel fronting 89.25 feet on
Huguenot Road also fronting 136.10 feet on Bon Oaks Lane and located in the southwest quadrant
of the ·intersection of these roads. Tax Map Sec. 10-2 (3) 10 Subdivision BonA ir Heights, Blk.
C, Lot 10~heet 3). ~
~d
Mr. Arthu~ Barnett and Mr. Wilson, who are residents of the area in question, state their
objections because this area is residential, they would like it to remain that way and if co~mmrcia
use starts it will gradually take the area over. No one is present to represent the applicant.
It is on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved that this request be and it herel
is denied.
Ayes: Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
77S036
In Dale Magisterial District, Heritage Savings and Loan Association requests a Conditional Use to
permit the operation of a Savings and Loan Association in an Agricultural (A) District on a 5
acre parcel fronting 849.23 feet on Iron Bridge Road also fronting 517.81 feet on Krause Road and
located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of these roads. Tax Map 95-8 (1) 19 (Sheet 3
Mr. Phillip Daffron is present representing Heritage Savings and Loan Association and states the
conditions required by the Planning Commission were acceptable. He adds that Heritage wants to
blend in with the comnunity, there will not be any drive-in type windows, they will be using
antique furniture and that he feels the use is outstanding for what is planned versus what could
possibly come in.
Mm. Apperson states that he feels this is a good use for Castlewood especially since the County
Museum could not afford the building. Mrs. Girone states that she feels better about the condi-
tional use since talking with Jeffrey O'Dell who stated that this was a good way to preserve the
old historic site. Mrs. Dorothy Armstrong is present and asks if the land behind Castle~od would
remain as it is. Mr. Balderson states tb~t there is another owner and it would not enter into this
case. Mrs. Armstrong expresses strong feeling to keep Castlewood as it is. Mr. Daffron states
that Heritage plans to do this as tach as is possible.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Bookman, it is resolved that this request be and it here
is approved subject to the conditions recoranended by the Planning Corm~ission.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and. Mr. Dodd.
74A072
Mr. Balderson states that this amenc~t for condition number 3 of Duplexes for Lamar Place is bein
discussed here today because the Planning staff noted violations and brought this to the attention Ii
of the Board of Supervisors in January, 1977. The Board then passed a resolution asking the
Commission to look into this matter. The recommendation before you can~ from the Planning
_Mrs. Britton, a resident of Wilkinson Terrace states that the residents in this area have been the
victims of wrong doings that the Board of Zoning Appeals guaranteed would not happen. She adds the
origirml intent of the conditions placed on the developer of Lamar Place have been badly battered,
they have compromised until they have lost all their privacy and are now being called wishy-washy
because of their willingness to cooperate and not be vindictive. She states the problem is not
the patios or the definition of '~mtural state" but with the loss of their privacy. She states the
residents had agreed with the conditions reconrnended by the Planning Commission as distributed
but in the meantime, she has had Mr. Watkins of Watkins Nursery survey their land and he indicates
that any trees planted will not survive or grow to their potential because of .the pines that will
block out the sunlight or will have to be removed. She also adds that there is very poor drainage
in the area which will also prevent trees from maturing properly. She states that the buffer has
been damaged beyond reclaim because of the nibbling the developer has done on the buffer for the
past year.
Mrs. Sherry Baker states that the Planning Conr0ission asked Mr. Stein to contact the residants
in the area long with a nurseryman who could work out this situation but nothing has been done.
Mr. Mason could work out this situation but nothing has been done. l~k. Mason states that Mr. Ste~
was waiting the outcomm of this meeting before proceeding.
Mr. Mason states that this has been an unfortunate situation and no matter what the result is, no
one will be really happy or satisfied. He states that Mr. Stein is present involuntarily and that
he has no choice but to continue to insist upon a reservation and non-waiver of his rights. He
that Mr. Stein denims all violations that he has been accused of making. Mr. Mason states that the
problem did not begin with the pouring of concrete patios at the back doors of these duplexes, all
of which extend only 1-3 feet into the buffer zone but was created in May, 1974, when the Board
of Zoning Appeals granted the special exception to ~Cenvac, Inc. subject to compliance with several
conditions, one of which is a buffer shall be provided which shall not be less than 40 feet in
He further states another problem is the buffer area shall remain in a natural state with no trees
to be cut or removed but he adds that there is some confusion on the definition of natural state.
He states there is another that no strugtures with the exception of fences shall be permitted in
the buffer area. He adds Mr. Stein is neither the developer nor the subdivider of this duplex
subdivision but the owner in fee of some of the lots in the Lamar Place Subdivision. He adds that
the Planning staff's interpretation of the conditions imposed upon this subdivision, particularly
the buffer area, has been throughout the course of building duplexs totally inconsistent and he
refers to '!natural state", where the utilities can be placed, the backyard and the buffer overlapp~
etc. Mr. ~i~son inquires if the Board passed a resolution authorizing the Planning Connission to
hear this case and if it had properly been advertised. }Ir. Micas answers in the affirmative to
both questions. Mr. Stein shows pictures of how he has cleaned the underbrush but to his knowledge
has not cut trees. He adds that he concurs with the recOnmendations of the Planning Conmission,
he does not want to be unfair but will do all he can to cooperate with the people involved, but he
feels he, too, has been treated unfairly and alludes to the placing of utilities.
Mr. Bookman states he had hoped everything had been worked oht but since it has not, he suggests
that perhaps it be sent back to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. Balderson states that the Board
of Zoning Appeals has no jurisdiction in this matter.
Mrs. Walker states they had been fighting shopping centers and apar~rmnts in the area and v~en this
issue was brought up, they decided to compromise because they were tired of fighting. She states
there has been a lack of cornm~ication, interpretation and definitions which have caused this
problem. She states the people trusted the County years ago but now it seems they will get no
relief and asks further who they are to trust if not the elected officials. There is considerably
more discussion concerning fences in lieu of trees, the destruction of the buffer area, trees
and the guaranteed life by ~{r. Stein if he were allowed to plant same, etc. It is on motion of Mr.
Dodd, seconded by Mr. Bookman, resolved after three hours of discussion that the conditions as
recormaended by the Planning Cormzission and as agreed to by all parties present at this hearing be
approved with the amendment to condition ~3 being as follows:
A buffer area as shown on the preliminary plan Shall be provided and maintained in the following
manner:
a. The buffer area shall not be less than 40 feet.
Any future sale or transfer of individual lots shall note the buffer area and make reference
to it in each individual deed and plat. The developer will file with the County restrictive
covenants and conditions which clearly state the provisions of Conditions #3 a., b., c., d and
e.
c. No trees, two inches or more in diameter shall be cut or removed and any existing undergrowth
or weeds shmll be '~andcut".
d. No structures with the exception of fences and open patios shall be permitted in the buffer
area. Patios may extend into the buffer area not more than 8 feet.
Trees, at least four feet in height, typical of the area shll be planted in the buffer strips,
five feet in from the property line behind lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 in Wilkinson Terrace and
possibly lots 13 and 24 if the owners agree, to provide a thicker screen and buffer from the
single family area. Plans for planting shall be submitted to and approved by the Development
Review Division prior to implementation. The Developmmnt Review Division shall confer with.a
co~L,L,;ttee of citizens. Mr. Stein and Mr. Williams in this regard with the Planning Conmission
being the final arbitrator if any problems arise.
The cost of the items required in e. above, shall not exceed $2,500 and a bond for this amount
shall be provided by Mr. stein.
g. ~r. Stein shall have the nurseryman planting the trees provide an appropriate bond to assure
that they live at least two years.
The amendmmnt to the conditional use shall apply only to the lots currently owned by Mr. Stein
(lots 9, 10, 11 and 12), however, Mr. Stein agreed to accomplish at his expense, appropriate tree
planting on lots 13 and 14 if the owners of those parcels will agree.
Ayes: 1@. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Mr. O'Neill agrees to contract one of the property owners regarding this matter.
It is generally agreed the Board recess for five minutes.
Reconvening:
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by blt. Dodd, it is resolved that this Board go into Executive
Session to discuss personnel matters.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Appers°n, Mr. Bookman and Mr. Dodd.
Reconvening: ..
On motion of Mrs]' Girone, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that Mr. Lane Ramsey be and he
hereby is appointed Budget Director for the County of Chesterfield effective April 1, 1977 at a
salary of $18,936 .... o '
Ayes': Mr. O'~i~eill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and 5@. Dodd.
On ration of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that Chairman of the Board of
Supervisors is authorized to notify Crosswinds, Inc. that its lease with the County will not be
renewed for the next fiscal year.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd.
~r. O'Neill and Mr. Bookman excuse themselves from discussion regarding a possible sewer line exten-
in the area of Route 60-Robious Road. After consideration of the matter, it is on motion of Mr. Dod
seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the Board of Supervisors approves a contract witJ~ O.S.
Hastings, BOb Porter, C.L. Bookman and other developers for providing sewer service in the Route 60
Robious Road area with the entire cost of the project to be financed by the developers in the area.
The cost of the off-site sewer, the pumping station, the force main and the engineering would be
refundable from sewer connection fees collected from persons connecting directly to the sewer in-
stalled under this proposal. Refunds shall be made in accordance with Section 20-32 of the County
Code.
Ayes: Mrs~ Girone, Mr. Dodd, and Mr. Apperson.
On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Dodd, it is resolved that this Board adjourns at 7:50 p.m
until 7: 30 p.m. on b~rch 30, 1977.
Ayes: Mr. O'Neill, Mrs. Girone, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Dodd.
C. ' ~ ~ Secretary
E. ~e~lin O'Neill, Chai~