05-27-1987 MinutesBOARD OF SUPgRVI$OllS
~II~ITE$
May 27, 1987
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman
Mr. Jesse J. Mayes, Vice Chairman
Mr. G. H. Applegate
Mr. R. Garland Dodd
Mrs. Joan Girone
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
Acting. County Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Mr. Stanley Balderson,
Dir., Econ. Develop.
Mrs. Doris DeHart,
Legislative Coord.
Mr. William Diggs, Real
Estate Assessor
Ms. Joan Dolezal,
Clerk to the Board
Chief Robert Eanes,
Fire Department
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer,
Asst. Co. Admin.
Ms. Alice Heffner,
Youth Svcs. Coord.
Mr. Robert Hodder,
Building Official
Mr. William Howell,
Dir., Gen. Services
Mr. Thomas Jacobson,
Dir. of Planning
Dr. Burt Lowe, Dir.,
Mental Health/Retard.
Mr. Robert Masden,
Asst. Co. Admin. for
Human Services
Mr. R. J. McCracken,
Transp. Director
Mr. Richard McElfish,
Dir. of Env. Eng.
Mr. Jeffrey L. Mincks,
Sr. Asst. Attorney
Mrs. Pauline Mitchell,
Dir. of News/Info.
Services
Col. Joseph Pittman,
Chief of Police
Mr. Richard Sale, Asst.
Co. Admin. for
Development
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Dir. of Parks & Rec.
Dr. Robert Wagenknecht,
Dir. of Libraries
Mr. David Welchons,
Dir. of Utilities
Mr. Frederick Willis,
Dir. of Human
Resource Management
Mr. Daniel called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. (EDST).
1. IINOCATION
Mr. Daniel introduced Reverend A. J. Simon, Pastor of Buford
Road Baptist Church, who gave the invocation.
87-375
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO TH~ FI~G OF THE ~NIT~D S?~T~$ OF
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of
America was recited.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3.A. AMENDMENT TO APRIL 22, 1987
Mr. Sale stated the Board, at its April 22, 1987 meeting,
approved rezoning and Conditional Use Planned Development for
Rowe Properties - Midlothian Development on property located
along Midlothian Turnpike (Case 86S164 Amended). He noted
there are two (2) errors in the motion as recorded in the
minutes for Case 86S164 (page 87-327) which should be amended
to reflect rezoning of 0.4 acres, rather than 4.0 acres, from
R-15 to B-2 and approval of a twenty (20) foot parking setback
exception, rather than a twenty-five (25) foot parking setback
exception.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
amended the minutes of April 22, 1987, from the following:
"And further, the Board approved rezoning from Residential
(R-15) to Community Business (B-2) of 4.0 acres, Conditional
Use Planned Development on this tract plus a 3.7 acre tract
currently zoned Community Business (B-2), and a twenty-five
(25) foot exception to the fifty (50) foot parking setback
requirement along Route 60, subject to the following condi-
tions:''
To the following:
"And further, the Board approved rezoning from Residential
(R-15) to Community Business (B-2) of 0.4 acres, Conditional
Use Planned Development on this tract plus a 3.7 acre tract
currently zoned Community Business (B-2), and a twenty (20)
foot exception to the fifty (50) foot parking setback require-
ment along Route 60, subject to the following conditions:"
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
3.B. MAY 13, 1987
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the minutes of May 13, 1987, as amended.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
Abstention: Mr. Daniel.
4. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
Mr. Masden introduced Mrs. Doris DeHart, Director of Legisla-
tive Services, who briefly explained the establishment and
purpose of the Commission on the Bicentennial of the United
States Constitution, which was established by the U. S. Con-
gress to oversee the preparations to honor the U.S. Constitu-
tion. She stated representatives from Virginia, including
individuals from Chesterfield, will be in Philadelphia on May
29 and May 30, 1987, to observe a reenactment of the Virginia
Plan which was instrumental in the origination of the Constitu-
tion. She stated Chesterfield County has been designated by
the Commission as a "Bicentennial Community" honoring the 200th
anniversary of the United States Constitution. She stated a
number of organizations within the County have planned commemo-
rative activities/events on September 16 and September 17,
87-376
1987, which dates have been designated as "Citizenship Day" and
"Constitution Day", respectively. She stated those participa-
ting in the preparations for the celebration are: the Honorable
Judge Ernest P. Gates, Chief Judge, Circuit Court; Mrs. Mary
Arline McGuire, County Treasurer and President of the Chester-
field County Historical Society; Mrs. Lucille Moseley, Coordi-
nator of the Museum; Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson, National Historian
for the American Legion; Ms~ Lee Chase, Program Specialist,
Secondary Social Studies for the School System; Ms. Ann Ander-
son, Chairman of the Chesterfield Business Council; Dr. Robert
Wagenknecht, Director of Libraries; Mrs. Albert F. Weaver,
President of the Daughters of the American Revolution; Mr. T.
Palmer Condrey, accountant and noted historian and genealogist
assisting with research for the project; Mrs. Marguerite
Christian, retired School Board Supervisor of Instruction; Dr.
Edgar A. Toppin, Dean of Graduate School for Virginia State
University and a member of the Virginia Commission for the
Bicentennial of the U.S. Constitution; Ms. Gail Schweickert,
League of Women Voters; Dr. Melton Jones, Dean of Academics and
Student Services at John Tyler Community College; and Mrs.
Michael Foster, Virginia Federation of Women Clubs. She
presented Mr. Daniel with a plaque, received May 6, 1987, from
the Commission on the Bicentennial of the United States Consti-
tution designating Chesterfield County as an official "Bicen-
tennial Community".
Mr. Daniel commended Mrs. DeHart and all those individuals
participating in the commemorative program for their efforts to
heighten the awareness of and deepen appreciation for the
Constitution and the rights and freedoms it guarantees. He
encouraged all citizens to participate in this celebration and
to pay tribute to the document which has come to symbolize
national ideals of freedom, justice, equal opportunity, hope
and a way of life envied the world over.
5. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mr. Daniel reported that, as a result of a recent trade mission
to Norway, the National Institute of Technology of Norway has
announced plans to construct an incubator project in Chester-
field County. He stated the incubator concept clusters small
businesses, with the companies often sharing services such as
the use of secretaries, copying machines, etc. He stated the
project will begin with six firms being housed in one facility.
He stated the site for the project has not yet been determined
but details will be forthcoming. He stated a second firm,
already incorporated in Virginia, has indicated its plans to
locate in Chesterfield County and will be announcing its plans
within the next year. He stated, in July, a third firm will
also announce its plans to locate in Chesterfield County. He
stated several business and trade groups have indicated inter-
est and excitement regarding the potential for development in
the metropolitan area, particularly Chesterfield County, and he
stated a line of communication has been established with those
groups, who will be visiting within the next several months to
assess economic potential. He stated this year's trade mission
netted positive results and that the County will continue to
develop the potential for future businesses and trade groups
abroad to locate within the County.
Mr. Applegate reported that the "ribbon cutting ceremony" for
the opening of the Richmond International Airport's new termi-
nal building has been scheduled for June 26, 1987. He stated,
however, he anticipates receipt of a report within the next
month indicating the need to consider an "expansion of the
expansion", particularly since traffic at the Airport continues
to increase (21.1% for the month of April as compared to the
national average of 4.6%), Airport business is flourishing and
the Commission should be prudent in its anticipation of the
future growth of the facility. He stated he also addressed a
group, "Teams for Progress", who were interested in the Airport
87-377
and, in addition, indicated full support of the facility and
any expansion contemplated for the future.
Mr. Applegate announced that the first of this year's Boulders
Concert Series will be held from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. on Sunday,
May 31, 1987, at the Boulders Office Complex. He stated the
concerts, which continue through September, are free and
encouraged all those interested to attend.
Mrs. Girone reported that a Water Resources Seminar was con-
ducted May 26, 1987, at Philip Morris, at which future water
plans for Chesterfield County and the State were discussed.
She stated the issue is very complex and involved but was well
presented.
Mr. Daniel stated Chesterfield County hosted the Richmond Metro
Chamber of Commerce's Board of Directors' Meeting at the
Courthouse Complex on May 21, 1987, and commended all those
involved for their diligent efforts, as the event was very
successful.
6. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR
CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of the Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the
Board deferred consideration of Item ll.E.2.b., Sewer Agreement
for Developer Participation for Sewer Extension Along Kingsland
Creek, until June 10, 1987; added Item ll.K., Recommendation to
Appropriate Funds and Authorize Contract with Municipal Advi-
sors, Inc., to Conduct a Nationwide Search for County Adminis-
trator for Chesterfield County; added Item 11.C.4., Request to
Rescind Street Light Installation at the Intersection of North
Pinetta Drive and Reddington Drive; and deferred consideration
of Item ll.D.I., Concurrence of Previous Board Resolutions of
Special Recognition at May 13, 1987 Meeting, and included Items
7.A. through 7.D., Resolutions and Special Recognitions for May
27, 1987, to this item, until such time as Mr. Dodd was pre-
sent; and adopted the agenda, as amended.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
7. RESOLUTIONS OF SPECIAL RECOGNITION
7.A. VIRGINIA STATE POLICE FOR THEIR NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED
ACCREDITATION AND EXEMPLARY PROFESSIONALISM
Chief Eanes and Colonel Pittman recognized the Virginia State
Police for their becoming the second state law enforcement
agency in the nation to be accredited by the Commission of
Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Inc., and for their
exemplary professionalism in providing quality law enforcement
services to the citizens of Chesterfield County and the State
of .Virginia. Chief Eanes introduced Colonel R. L. Suthard,
State Police Superintendent; Lieutenant W. G. Massengill,
Superintendent of Staff, and First Sergeant D. W. Holland,
Supervisor in charge of District 6, which includes Chester-
field, Powhatan and Amelia Counties.
Mr. Daniel commended Colonel Suthard and the Virginia State
Police for their outstanding accomplishments. He stated he
felt these achievements required a team effort from all those
participating in public safety who give of their time and
personal efforts to make the area a safe, quality area in which
to live.
Mr. Daniel stated the formal vote would be made later during
the meeting when all the Board members were present. He
presented the executed resolution to Colonel Suthard and
congratulated those present on the distinguished honor.
87-378
Colonel Suthard stated the Virginia State Police's philosophy
is that the success of law enforcement is based and measured by
public support on a long-term basis. He stated he felt strong
unity and working relationships with localities' Fire and
Police Departments, Boards of Supervisors, Court Systems,
Prosecutors and other elements of the judicial system, etc.,
are extremely important to the State Police. He pledged the
Virginia State Police Department's continued support, coordina-
tion and cooperation to the County and accepted with pride and
appreciation the resolution on behalf of the men and women of
the Virginia State Police who made the recognition possible.
7.B. MRS. DELIA RAWLS, REAL ESTATE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
Mr. Willis presented Mr. Diggs, Director of ~ssessment of Real
Estate, who introduced Mrs. Delia Rawls. He stated Mrs. Rawls
has served the County for twenty-one (21) years and in her
capacity has been a loyal and conscientious employee who will
be missed. He stated Mrs. Rawls has demonstrated great respect
for the citizens she has served and her fellow workers and her
dedicated service has been a credit to the County. He
introduced the staff from the Assessor's Office who were also
present.
Mr. Daniel stated the formal vote would be made later during
the meeting when all the Board members were present. He
presented the executed resolution to Mrs. Rawls and commended
her for her service and dedication to the County. Mrs. Rawls
expressed her appreciation for the opportunity to have worked
with the County and for the recognition bestowed upon her.
7.C. DR. HOWARD O. SULLINS, SUPERINTENDENT OF CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Mr. Daniel stated the formal vote recognizing the outstanding
contributions of Dr. Howard O. Sullins upon his retirement
would be made later during the meeting when all the Board
members were present. He stated the resolution will be pre-
sented to him at a reception in his honor on Sunday, May 31,
1987.
7.D. DONATION OF "BICENTENNIAL BOOKSHELF" BY FRIENDS OF THE
LIBRARY
It was generally agreed to defer consideration of the donation
of the "Bicentennial Bookshelf" by the Friends of the Library
until a representative of the Friends of the Library was
present.
8. HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON~NSCHEDULED MATTERS OR CLAIMS
There were no hearings of citizens on unscheduled matters or
claims.
9on.
DEFERRED ITEMS
INTERACTIVE INSPECTION SYSTEM FOR THE BUILDING
INSPECTION OFFICE
Mr. Sale stated, in its continuing efforts to improve services
to the citizens of the County, the Building Inspections Depart-
ment requests Board approval of implementation of a "Connect"
Interactive Inspection System. He stated this system will
allow callers to schedule inspections and request information
via touch-tone telephone twenty-four hours a day. He stated
the system will produce a cost savings of over $33,000 per year
in salaries, will vastly improve service to contractors and
citizens and will provide the ability to handle even heavier
workloads without additional personnel.
87-379
There was discussion relative to the cost savings for the
upcoming fiscal year versus the appropriation to implement the
system; the deletion of two additional data entry operators
from the FY88 budget in lieu of implementation of the "Connect"
system; the ability of this system to handle heavier workloads
without additional personnel; etc.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved and appropriated $46,500 from the General Fund Balance
for the purchase of the "Connect" Interactive Inspection
Computer System for the Building Inspection Department, with
the understanding that, in FY88, when the "Connect" system is
fully installed, $30,000 in salary dollars can be returned to
the General Fund Balance and the Building Inspection Department
will begin receiving reimbursement from the Utilities Depart-
ment sufficient to reimburse the General Fund Balance for the
remainder of the cost of the system.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
9.B. AUTOMATED SITE/SPACE INVENTORY SYSTEM AND DATA
COLLECTION SERVICES FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Sale stated the Economic Development Department, in its
efforts to advance the County's economic development program
and in collaboration with the Data Processing Department,
requests Board approval of implementation of an automated
County-wide site/space inventory system, which will identify
sites/spaces throughout the County to prospective clients who
own or manage properties which are marketable or have a poten-
tial commercial and industrial marketing. He stated Broughton
Systems, Inc. has submitted a proposal to deliver the automated
system which will be micro-computer based providing menu-driven
mainframe County interactive capacity and Virginia Commonwealth
University has submitted a proposal to collect data for an
initial 750 parcels to be included in the inventory system. He
stated funding for both of these projects was included in the
Economic Development Department's 1986-87 budget.
There was discussion relative to the companies selected to
collect data for the system, appropriations for the projects,
the number of maximum parcels that can be handled, obtaining
information concerning the commercial/industrial multiple
listing service and its use as a part of input information into
the inventory system, the enormity of the project, who will be
responsible for handling the project and the need to ensure
that there is adequate staff to handle such a task, the time-
liness of implementing the system, etc.
Mr. Applegate expressed concern that this request had been
increased by $25,000 to include authorization for award of
contract to Virginia Commonwealth University. Mr. Sale stated,
although funding for awarding the contract to Virginia Common-
wealth University was included in the Economic Development
Department's budget for 1986-87, staff was not prepared at the
May 13, 1987 meeting to present the request to the Board for
consideration. He stated since that time staff has completed
the work necessary to bring the item before the Board and he
felt it was appropriate to combine the two items at this time.
He stated it is anticipated the project will be completed by
the end of August, 1987.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to
execute the necessary documents awarding contracts to Broughton
Systems, Inc., in the amount of $32,585, for an automated
site/space inventory system, and to Virginia Commonwealth
University, not to exceed $25,000, to collect data for an
initial 750 parcels to be included in the automated site/space
inventory system, for the purpose of enabling the Department of
87-380
Economic Development to provide detailed site information for
companies interested in locating in Chesterfield County.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
9.C. CHANGES IN SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM FOR LANCERS BOULEVARD,
ELKHARDT ROAD AND TACONY DRIVE
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, construction of Route 150, Project 0150-020-101,
C503, D630 as constructed and approved by the State Highway
Commissioner, necessitates changes in the Secondary System.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that portion of the old
location of Route 663, i.e., Section #1 shown in yellow on the
sketch titled, "Changes in the Secondary System Due to Reloca-
tion and Construction on Route 150 and 360 interchange, Project
0150-020-101,C503,D630", dated at Richmond, Virginia, October
15, 1986, a total distance of 0.09 miles, does not serve a
public need and is to be discontinued from the Secondary System
of State Highway, pursuant to Section 33.1-150 of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, amended;
AND, FURTHER, that portion of old location of Route 2147,
i.e., Section #2 shown in yellow on the sketch titled, "Changes
in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on
Route 150 and 360 interchange, Project 0150-020-101,C503,D630",
dated at Richmond, Virginia, October 15, 1986, a total distance
of 0.04 miles, does not serve a public need and is to be
discontinued from the Secondary System of State Highway,
pursuant to Section 33.1-150 of the Code of Virginia, 1950,
amended;
AND, FURTHER, that portion of Secondary Route 1686, i.e.,
Section ~4 as shown in brown on the sketch titled, "Changes in
the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on
Route 150 and 360 interchange, Project 0150-020-101,C503,D630",
dated at Richmond, Virginia, October 15, 1986, a total distance
of 0.29 miles, be and hereby is added to the Secondary System
of State Highway, pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, amended;
AND, FURTHER, that portion of Secondary Route 2520, i.e.,
Section #5 as shown in brown on the sketch titled, "Changes in
the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on
Route 150 and 360 interchange, Project 0150-020-101,C503,D630",
dated at Richmond, Virginia, October 15, 1986, a total distance
of 0.21 miles, be and hereby is added to the Secondary System
of State Highway, pursuant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, amended;
AND, FURTHER, that portion of old Route 1686, i.e.,
Section #6 as shown in orange on the sketch titled, "Changes in
the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on
Route 150 and 360 interchange, Project 0150-020-101,C503,D630",
dated at Richmond, Virginia, October 15, 1986, a total distance
of 0.15 miles, be and hereby is renumbered.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
9.D. APPOINTMENTS
9.D.1. YOUTH SERVICES COMMISSION
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
appointed the following youth members to serve on the Youth
87-381
Services Commission, whose terms are effective immediately and
will expire on June 30, 1988:
Ms. Sonya Wei
Ms. Erin Kelly
Ms. Holly Ford
Ms. Kahlicia Pettus
Midlothian Magisterial District
Midlothian Magisterial District
Clover Hill Magisterial District
Matoaca Magisterial District
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
It was generally agreed to defer additional youth and adult
nominations to the Youth Services Commission for Bermuda,
Clover Hill and Dale Districts until June 10, 1987.
9.D.2. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
appointed Mr. William F. Seymour, III and Mr. Curtis C. Duke,
representing Midlothian and Matoaca Magisterial Districts,
respectively, to serve on the Industrial Development Authority,
whose terms are effective July 1, 1987, and will expire June
30, 1991.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Dodd.
10.
PUBLIC~RARING$
TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO SMOKE DETECTORS IN
CERTAIN BUILDINGS
Chief Eanes stated this date and time had been scheduled for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance relating to the re-
quirement for the installation of smoke detectors in buildings
containing one or more dwelling units which are rented or
leased and in rooming houses. He stated the requirement for
the installation of smoke detectors in such buildings is an
effort to provide a greater margin of fire safety to those
residing in such dwellings, as a properly installed and main-
tained smoke detector increases the occupants' chances of
escaping a fire, saving lives, preventing injury, and/or
minimizing property damage.
Mr. Dodd arrived at the meeting.
Chief Eanes introduced Ms. Joann Monday and Ms. Barbara Eubank,
President and Executive Director,' respectively, of the Virginia
Apartment Management Association, who were present. Ms. Eubank
voiced support for the ordinance. She expressed appreciation
for the opportunity to have worked with Fire Marshal Dennis
Turlington with respect to this ordinance.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 9.1
OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING ARTICLE II
RELATING TO SMOKE DETECTORS IN CERTAIN BUILDINGS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Chesterfield, Virginia:
(1)
amended,
sections:
That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
is amended by amending and adding the following
87-382
Sec. 9.1-10 Required.
Pursuant to the authority set forth in Section 15.1-29.9
of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, smoke detectors
shall be installed in (i) each building containing one or more
dwelling units which are rented or leased; (ii) each room
intended or used for overnight occupancy in all hotels or
motels regularly used, offered for or intended to be used to
provide overnight sleeping accommodations to one (1) or more
persons; and (iii) rooming houses regularly used, offered for,
or intended to be used to provide overnight sleeping
accommodations.
(a) "Smoke detectors" shall mean mechanical devices
powered by batteries or alternating current capable of sounding
an audible alarm upon sensing visible or invisible products of
combustion, meeting the specifications set forth by
Underwriters Laboratories for single station smoke detectors.
(b) "Owner" shall mean one or more persons, jointly or
separately, in whom is vested:
1. Ail or part of the legal title to the property,
or
2. Ail or part of the beneficial ownership and a
right to present use and enjoyment of the premises, and the
term includes a mortgagee in possession.
(c) "Dwelling unit" shall mean a single unit providing
complete independent living facilities for one (1) or more
persons, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping,
eating, cooking and sanitation.
(d) "Tenant" shall mean a person who rents or leases a
dwelling unit.
Sec. 9-1.10.1 Installation Requirements
(a) The smoke detectors installed pursuant to this
section, must be capable of sensing visible or invisible
products of combustion and providing an audible alarm
sufficient to warn the occupants of the buildings. Smoke
detectors installed in dwelling units of buildings intended for
rent or lease need only sound or alarm suitably to warn the
occupants within that dwelling unit.
(b) Appropriate permits as required by the Virginia
Uniform Statewide Building Code must be secured for the
installation of all smoke detectors powered by alternating
current; provided, however, that no fee will be charged for the
permit.
(c) The smoke detectors shall be installed in conformance
with the applicable sections of the Virginia Uniform Statewide
Building Code. The fire department shall approve the specific
locations of the placement of smoke detectors on walls or
ceilings.
Sec. 9.1-10.2 Responsibilities for Testing and Maintenance
(a) The agent or owner of the hotel or motel shall
maintain all smoke detectors in good working order at all times
and shall test each smoke detector each day at the time the
rooms are cleaned.
(b) The owner or agent of the owner of any building con-
taining a dwelling unit which is rented or leased, at the
beginning of each tenancy and at least annually thereafter,
shall furnish the tenant with a certificate that all required
87-383
smoke detectors are present, have been inspected, and are in
good working order.
(c) The owner or agent of the owner of a building
containing one (1) or more dwelling units which are rented or
leased shall maintain in good working order smoke detectors
located in hallways, stairwells, and other public or common
areas.
(d) The tenant shall be responsible for interim testing,
repair, and maintenance of smoke detectors installed in his
rented or leased unit and for providing written notice to the
owner that such smoke detector is in need of service, repair,
or replacement. Such service, repair, or replacement shall
occur within five days of receipt of written notice from the
tenant that a smoke detector is malfunctioning.
(e) The owner or agent of the owner of any building con-
taining one (1) more more dwelling units which are rented or
leased shall provide written notification to the tenant of the
responsibilities and duties imposed by subsection (d) of this
section.
(f) The owner or agent of any building containing one (1)
or more dwelling units which are rented or leased, or of any
hotel or motel, shall provide the County with written
certification annually that all required smoke detectors are
present, have been inspected as required by this Section
9.1-10.2 and are in good working order.
Sec. 9.1-10.3 Enforcement and Penalties
The chief of the fire department or his duly authorized
representatives are authorized to administer and enforce the
requirements of Sections 9.1-10.1 to 9.1-10.5. Failure to
comply with the requirements for the installation and
maintenance of smoke detectors shall constitute a violation of
this chapter and shall be a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine
of not more than one thousand dollars or by imprisonment of not
more than thirty (30) days, or by both such fine and
imprisonment.
Sec. 9.1-10.4 Article Not Exempted from Compliance with Code
Nothing in this article shall excuse any owner of the
required buildings from compliance with all other applicable
provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code.
Sec. 9.1-10.5 Exemptions.
Any building containing fewer than four dwelling units
which was not in compliance with the preceding requirements on
July 1, 1984, shall be exempted until such time as that
building or any dwelling unit therein is sold or rented to
another person.
(2) The amendments to this
effective one year from passage.
ordinance shall become
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd stated he was pleased to see there had been a change
in public attitude toward the installation of smoke detectors
in rental properties as they are aware of the benefits of the
life saving devices. Mr. Daniel commended all those involved
in the preparation of the ordinance for their diligent efforts.
87-384
11. I~EWBU$INE$S
ll.A. RESOLUTION URGING GOVERNOR AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO GIVE
SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE NEEDS OF MENTALLY-DISABLED IN
1988-90 BIENNIAL BUDGET
Mr. Masden stated the Community Services Board experiences much
difficulty in its efforts to serve all the people within the
County in need of its services, considering the funding it
receives from the State for this purpose. He stated the State
is continuing its efforts to reduce the census at its State
facilities which places more and more burden on the local
governments to sustain the financial burden to provide the
needed services.
Ms. Yvette B. Ridley, Chairman of the Community Services Board,
requested the Board approve the proposed resolution urging the
Governor and General Assembly to give special attention to the
needs of the mentally-disabled as a top priority in its 1988-
1990 Biennium and apprise them of the fact that the County is
concerned about the mentally-disabled in Chesterfield and feels
that the State has a financial obligation and responsibility to
assist with this problem. She stated a major statewide initia-
tive, known as "Make Waves, Virginia", is a major funding
initiative by the Coalition for the Mentally-Disabled Citizens
of Virginia to bring this situation to the attention of the
Governor and the General Assembly.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors is
greatly concerned about citizens in need of mental health,
mental retardation and substance abuse services; and
WHEREAS, over 240 citizens are currently on waiting lists
for the programs of the Chesterfield Community Services Board,
and many of these persons have waited several years; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County provides a significant
portion of the funding for the Chesterfield Community Services
Board through local taxes; and
WHEREAS, local government cannot be expected to provide
the majority of funding for services which have historically
and traditionally been the responsibility of State government;
and
WHEREAS, the lack of adequate treatment resources is not
unique to Chesterfield, but pervasive throughout the
Commonwealth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors urges the Governor and the General
Assembly to consider funding of services for the mentally
disabled among the top priorities for the 1988-1990 Biennium.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.B. APPOINTMENTS
ll.B.1. ARWA BOARD AND MEDC OPERATING COMMITTEE
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
appointed Mr. Lane B. Ramsey, Acting County Administrator, to
serve on the Appomattox River Water Authority Board, whose term
is effective immediately and will expire November 21, 1989; and
to serve on the Metropolitan Economic Development Council
Operating Committee, whose term is effective immediately and is
at the pleasure of the Board.
Vote: Unanimous
87-385
ll.B.2. CHESTERFIELD BICENTENNIAL COMMISSION
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
nominated the following individuals to serve as the official
Chesterfield County Bicentennial Commission:
Mrs. Doris DeHart Coordinator, Bicentennial Commission
Mrs. Mary Arline McGuire President, Chesterfield Historical
Society
Mrs. Lucille Moseley Coordinator, County Museum
Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson American Legion
Ms. Lee Chase Program Specialist, Secondary Social
Studies, School System
Ms. Ann Anderson Chairman, Chesterfield Business
Council
Dr. Robert Wagenknecht Director, Chesterfield Libraries
Mrs. Albert F. Weaver President, Daughters of American
Revolution
Mr. T. Palmer Condrey Accountant, Historian and Genealogist
Hon. Ernest P. Gates Chief Judge, Circuit Court
Mrs. Marguerite Christian Retired School Board Supervisor of
Instruction
Dr. Edgar A. Toppin
Ms. Gayle Schweickert
Dr. Melton R. Jones
Mrs. Michael Foster
Vote: Unanimous
Department of History, Virginia State
University
League of Women Voters
Dean of Academics and Student
Services, John Tyler Community College
Federation of Women Clubs
ll.C. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS
ll.C.1. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board defer-
red consideration of street light installation cost approvals
for Dale Magisterial District at the intersection of Black Oak
Road and Salem Church Road ($1,195) and at the intersection of
Southmoor Road and Falstone Road ($1,061.92) until July, 1987;
and further, the Board approved street light installation cost
approvals at the following locations, with funds to be expended
from the Bermuda District Street Light Funds:
Intersection of Ruffin Mill Road and Walthall Drive
($993.00); and
Intersection of Meadowdale Boulevard and South Beulah Road
($372.00).
Vote: Unanimous
11.C.2. STREET LIGHT REQUESTS
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the installation of street lights at the following
87-386
locations, with funds to be expended from the District Street
Light Funds as indicated:
Intersection of Norcliff Road and Jefferson Davis Highway,
Bermuda District;
Shadycrest Lane at the end of the street, Midlothian
District; and
Intersection of Hull Street Road and Woodlake Village
Parkway, Clover Hill District.
And further, the Board deferred consideration of street light
requests for the following locations in the Bermuda District
until June 10, 1987:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Intersection of Blithe Drive and Lively Street,
Intersection of Blithe Drive and Merry Drive,
Intersection of Blithe Drive and Parker Lane,
Parker Lane between Blithe Drive and West Hundred Road,
Parker Lane between Blithe Drive and the dead-end,
Intersection of Blithe Drive and Euphoria Road,
Intersection of Blithe Drive and Placid Drive,
Blithe Drive at the end of cul-de-sac, and
Bermuda Hundred Road at the dead-end.
Vote: Unanimous
11.C.3. 3 CENT ROAD FUNDS/BERMUDA DISTRICT
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv-
ed and appropriated $1,250 from the Bermuda District 3 Cent
Road Fund for the rental of equipment needed to excavate a
large channel and purchase riprap for a creek stabilization
project approximately 500 feet south of Normandale Avenue.
Vote: Unanimous
11.C.4. REQUEST FOR STREET LIGHT WITHDRAWAL
Mrs. Girone stated at the October 8, 1986 meeting the Board
approved a request for a street light installation at the
intersection of North Pinetta Drive and Reddington Drive
($105.00). She stated the request was made by the neighborhood
civic association but without the consent of the property
owner, Ms. Alice Smith, on whose property the pole was install-
ed. She stated Ms. Smith was very disturbed by the action and
has requested the pole be removed.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved withdrawal of a street light installation at the
intersection of North Pinetta Drive and Reddington Drive
($105.00), with the understanding that the approved appropria-
tion of funding can be used at a future time for the installa-
tion of a street light elsewhere in the area that will meet the
needs of the neighborhood.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.D. CONSENT ITEMS
ll.D.1. CONCURRENCE OF PREVIOUS BOARD RESOLUTIONS OF SPECIAL
RECOGNITION AT MAY 13, 1987 MEETING
On motion of the Board, the Board reaffirmed adoption of
Resolutions adopted on May 13, 1987, for:
Declaring May 22 and May 23, 1987 as "Poppy Days;"
Recognizing Outstanding Achievements of the Police Hostage
Negotiation Team; and
87-387
3. Declaring May as "Foster Parent Month."
Vote: Unanimous
7.A. VIRGINIA STATE POLICE FOR THEIR NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED
ACCREDITATION AND EXEMPLARY PROFESSIONALISM
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of State Police has been
a partner and full supporter of the highly successful Central
Virginia Med-Flight program by providing pilots and aircraft
for the program; and
WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of State Police has been
completely cooperative in providing assistance to the Public
Safety Agencies of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of State Police became
the second state law enforcement agency in the nation to be
accredited by the Commission of Accreditation for Law Enforce-
ment Agencies; and
WHEREAS, The Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforce-
ment Agencies, Inc., constituting a body of nationally recog-
nized professionals in law enforcement, finds The Virginia
Department of State Police in compliance with 739 standards
exemplifying the Department's status as a truly professional
organization.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the outstanding
achievements of The Virginia Department of State Police and
extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chester-
field County, their appreciation for the professional excel-
lence and quality law enforcement services provided the citi-
zens of Chesterfield County and the State of Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
7.B. MRS. DELIA RAWLS, REAL ESTATE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Delia Rawls will retire from the Department
of Real Estate Assessments, Chesterfield County, on June 1,
1987; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Rawls has provided 21 years of quality
service to the citizens of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and the Board of Supervisors
will miss Mrs. Rawls' diligent service; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Rawls has demonstrated great respect for
citizens and her fellow workers and her dedicated service has
been a credit to the County.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes Mrs. Delia
Rawls and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of
Chesterfield County their appreciation for her service to the
County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolu-
tion be presented to Mrs. Delia Rawls and that this resolution
be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of
Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia.
Vote: Unanimous
87-388
7.C. DR. HOWARD O. SULLINS, SUPERINTENDENT OF CHESTERFIELD
COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, Dr. Howard O. Sullins has announced his retire-
ment as Superintendent of Chesterfield County Schools, effec-
tive June 30, 1987 after serving in this capacity since 1974;
and
WHEREAS, Since Dr. Sullins assumed this position, the
System has grown by more than 12,000 students to become the
third largest in the State, with an enrollment this year of
approximately 39,000 students in 45 schools; and
WHEREAS, During Dr. Sullins' tenure 15 schools have been
built, including two middle schools, three high schools, a
vocational-technical center, and three elementary schools
currently under construction, with more than 60 expansions and
improvements to existing schools; and
WHEREAS, During the System's rapid growth, the schools
have maintained a reputation for excellence and community
involvement, the curriculum has been strengthened and the
students have exhibited continual improvements and high
achievements; and
WHEREAS, During Dr. Sullins' tenure both teachers and
students have received state and national awards and recogni-
tion, the school curricula was increased to include modern and
specialized educational programs, etc; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Sullins is the immediate past President of
the Virginia Association of School Administration, has served
on several State Department of Education Advisory Committees,
the most recent being the State Superintendent's Advisory
Council, as well as having been active on a number of other
boards and commissions.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors hereby expresses its appreciation
and gratitude to the outstanding efforts and dedication of Dr.
Howard O. Sullins in his capacity as Superintendent of the
Chesterfield County School System;
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board commends Dr.
Howard O. Sullins for his untiring efforts to afford the
children of the County the best possible education and to
strengthen their minds for future careers and aspirations;
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors congratulates Dr. Howard O. Sullins for
his outstanding achievements and wishes him success in his
future endeavors.as well as a long and happy retirement.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.D.2. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Blithe Road and Lively Street in Shady Acres
Subdivision, Section 1, Bermuda District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded
by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Blithe Road and Lively Street
in Shady Acres Subdivision, Section 1, Bermuda District, be and
they hereby are established as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Blithe Road, beginning where State
87-389
Maintenance ends, existing Blithe Road, State Route 1562, and
running easterly 0.03 mile to the intersection with Lively
Street, then continuing easterly 0.1 mile to end in a
cul-de-sac; and Lively Street, beginning at the intersection
with Blithe Road and running southerly 0.12 mile to end in a
cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
easements.
These roads serve 22 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for Lively Street and a 60' right-of-way for
Blithe Road.
This section of Shady Acres Subdivision is recorded as follows:
Section 1. Plat Book 23, Page 65, January 9, 1975.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Cranbeck Terrace, Cranbeck Circle and Cranbeck
Court in Cranbrook, Midlothian District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded
by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Cranbeck Terrace, Cranbeck
Circle and Cranbeck Court in Cranbrook, Midlothian District, be
and they hereby are established as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Cranbeck Terrace, beginning at the
intersection with existing Cranbeck Road, State Route 674, and
going easterly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Cranbeck
Circle, and then continuing easterly 0.06 mile to end in a
cul-de-sac; Cranbeck Circle, beginning at the intersection with
Cranbeck Terrace and going northerly 0.04 mile to the
intersection with Cranbeck Court, and then continuing
northwesterly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Cranbeck
Court, beginning at the intersection with Cranbeck Circle and
going northeasterly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-de-sac.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
easements.
These roads serve 34 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50'
right-of-way for all of these roads except Cranbeck Court which
has a 40' right-of-way.
This section of Cranbrook is recorded as follows:
Plat Book 47, Page 39, September 25, 1984.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.D.3. SCHOOL GRANT FOR PARTNERSHIP IN ASTRONOMY EDUCATION
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved and appropriated $20,000 to increase the School Budget
in revenue and expenditures for a grant, "Partnership in
Astronomy Education", received from the State Department of
Education, which is a Title II Grant dealing with an as%ronomy
87-390
project at the Science Museum of Virginia.
no additional County funds will be involved.)
Vote: Unanimous
(It is noted that
ll.K. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS AND AUTHORIZE CON-
TRACT WITH MUNICIPAL ADVISORS, INC. TO CONDUCT SEARCH
FOR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to
prepare the necessary documents for a contract, to be executed
by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, with Municipal
Advisors, Inc., to begin the search process for the position of
County Administrator for Chesterfield County and, further,
appropriated $13,000 from the Fund Balance for said contract.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.E. UTILITIES ITEMS
ll.E.1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER RESOLUTION AND ORDER TO
ABANDON PORTION OF EASY STREET IN GAY FARMS, SECTION 2
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider adoption of a resolution and order
to abandon a portion of Easy Street in Gay Farms, Section 2.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against this
matter.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted
the following resolution and order:
RESOLUTION AND ORDER
TO ABANDON A PORTION OF EASY STREET
WHEREAS, by resolution of the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors, the Board requested that the Virginia Department
of Highways and Transportation accept Easy Street within Gay
Farms, Section 2, into the State Secondary System of Highways;
WHEREAS, by resolution of the Virginia Department of
Highways and Transportation Commission dated July 1, 1966, Easy
Street, Route 1563, was accepted into the system;
WHEREAS, since July 1, 1966, Easy Street, Route 1563, has
remained in the State Secondary System of Highways under the
control, supervision, management, and jurisdiction of the
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation;
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. J. S. Black and Mr. and Mrs. James
R. Spitler petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County to abandon a portion of Easy Street, Route 1563,
pursuant to Section 33.1-151 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended;
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of this Board on April
22, 1987, the required notices of the County's intention to
abandon a portion of Easy Street, Route 1563, have been given
in that: on April 24, 1987, a notice was posted in at least
three places along Easy Street, Route 1563; and, on May 13,
1987 and May 20, 1987, a notice was published in the Richmond
News Leader, having general circulation within the County; and,
on April 24, 1987, a notice was sent to the Commissioner of the
Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation;
WHEREAS, no landowner affected by the proposed
abandonment has filed a petition for a public hearing;
WHEREAS, this Resolution and Order is entered within four
87-391
months after the thirty days during which notice was posted as
described above;
WHEREAS, the safety and welfare of the public would be
best served by the abandonment of a portion of Easy Street,
Route 1563, as a public road; and
WHEREAS, the abandonment of a portion of Easy Street,
Route 1563, as a public road will not abridge the rights of any
citizen.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED, that pursuant
to Section 33.1-151 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended,
the portion of secondary road, more fully described as follows,
is hereby abandoned as a public road:
A portion of Easy Street, Route 1563, within Gay
Farms, Section 2, as shown on a plat prepared by
LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers, dated November 13,
1963, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution
and Order.
The effect of this Resolution and Order, pursuant to
Section 33.1-153 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, is
that the above described portion of Easy Street, Route 1563,
shall not remain a public road or crossing. ~
Accordingly, the Clerk of this Board shall send a
certified copy of this Resolution and Order, together with the
plat hereto attached, to the State Highway Commissioner. The
Clerk shall request that the Commissioner certify to the
County, pursuant to Section 33.1-154 of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, that the above described portion of Easy
Street, Route 1563, is no longer necessary for public use.
Vote: Unanimous
ll.E.2. WATER AND SEWER ITEMS
tl.E.2.a. CONTRACT WITH CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE ASSOCIATES TO
PERFORM WATER AND SEWER RATE FEE STUDY
Mr. Sale stated Board approval is requested for a contract with
the firm of Camp, Dresser & McKee to perfor~n a rate and fee
study as well as develop and install a rate model for the
Department of Utilities. He stated the Board of Supervisors in
the 1986-87 Budget and Work Plan approved a water and sewer
rate fee study for the Utilities Department. He stated an
in-depth study is needed to meet the rapid growth requirements
of the Utilities system, with regard to operations and mainte-
nance, debt service and capital improvement programs. He
stated the Data Processing Department has been involved in the
preparation of the request for proposals and will continue to
be involved during the course of the study. He stated this
study can be completed in approximately six (6) months at a
cost of $92,800 and the funding is included in the 1986-87
Operating Budget.
There was lengthy discussion relative to the purpose of the
proposed study; the fact that the rates have been established
only through FY87-88; the necessity for obtaining outside
consultant services to perform the study and the cost of those
services; when the last rate study was performed and by whom;
how current rate increases had been determined; whether or not
the rates were based on present or projected densities; whether
or not the rate study could be performed without considering
the needs of the entire County; whether or not the 7% utility
rate increase annually is sufficient to provide for future
utility services, etc.
Mr. Mayes expressed concern that the Board has approved zoning
requests for homes, in which people have invested their say-
87-392
ings, but those people cannot obtain water or sewer service
because the land will not perk. Mr. Daniel stated that the
study will take into consideration infill lines, which are
those areas which are not inhabited. Mr. Sale stated staff is
attempting to address this issue through the Capital Improve-
ment Program for the Utilities Department and through Board
actions in terms of extending utilities to existing subdivi-
sions as well as through changes that will be discussed with
the Board in a future work program in the Subdivision Ordinance
in terms of requiring public water and sewer to prevent these
types of situations from developing in the future. Mr. Daniel
questioned if the study would be comprehensive enough to
present alternative financing scenarios at varying interest
rates (i.e., capital expenditures are likely to vary with
fluctuating interest rates). Mr. Sale stated such scenarios
would be included so that staff, in future years, could inject
varying interest rates.
Mr. Mayes stated he felt that financing on the basis of provid-
ing utilities after the demand occurs, after the homes are
built, prior to the construction of roads and schools, etc., is
counterproductive and if the County is going to continue to
permit expansion and development it will have to provide a
mechanism by which utilities can be provided prior to the
construction occurring. Mr. Daniel stated he felt it is the
responsibility of the developer to obtain and pay for sewer for
his property if he intends to develop it and, if he cannot do
this, then the developer has a legal prerogative of gaining
zoning under certain conditions where septic tank systems and
wells are commonly accepted methods for obtaining sewer and
water for the property. He stated those people purchasing
houses with wells and septic systems know what they are pur-
chasing. He stated government cannot be all things to all
people at all times; it can provide the direction and leader-
ship but it cannot make decisions for every developer. He
stated if the County cannot provide water and sewer in certain
areas, then development would continue on larger-sized lots
with wells and septic systems and if, in the future, those
systems fail then people will look to the local government to
remedy those situations.
There was no motion made on the issue and the Chairman tabled
the matter.
ll.E.3. CONSENT ITEMS
ll.E.3.a. AUTHORIZATION TO DISCONTINUE TEMPORARY SEWER PERMIT
POLICY
Mr. Sale stated the Temporary Sewer Permit Policy, authorized
by resolution of the Board on November 13, 1963, is causing a
number of problems to both the plumber/builder and staff and
has proven to be very difficult to administer. He stated, in
view of the problems which have been encountered, staff has
implemented a mechanism which will provide staff with the
assurance that sewer connections by the plumber will not be
made until the public sewers are ready for service and to allow
the builders to defer payment of the sewer connection fee until
such time as the request for water service is made. He stated
staff feels that this change will provide at least the same, if
not better, service to the builders, plumbers, etc.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to take
the necessary action to rescind the Temporary Sewer Permit
Policy resolution of November 13, 1963, which action would
eliminate the issuance of temporary sewer permits upon payment
of the $10.00 portion of the sewer connection fee for the
purpose of allowing the builders to install the sewer lines
from the building to the County's sewer lateral, which would
make it possible to grade and seed the property without having
to disturb the area for the inspection of the sewer and to
87-393
defer payment of the full fee until such time as a water meter
was needed, with the exception that where public water is not
used, the entire fee is due prior to connecting to the public
system.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Abstention: Mr. Mayes.
ll.E.3.b. SEWER CONTRACT FOR STONEY CREEK SUBDIVISION
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to
execute any necessary documents for the following sewer con-
tract:
Contract Number S84-11M Stoney Creek Subdivision On-site and
Off-site sewers.
Developer:
Contractor: Lyttle Utilities, Inc.
Total Contract Cost:
Total Estimated County Cost:
(Refund through connection fees)
Estimated Developer Cost:
Number of Connections: Future
Code: 5N-2511-997
Brandermill Investment Associates
$339,553.48
$187,486.68
$152,066.80
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Abstention: Mr. Mayes.
ll.E.3.c. SEWER CONTRACT FOR CROSS POINTE MARKET PLACE
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to
execute any necessary documents for the following sewer con-
tract:
Contract Number S87-55M Cross Pointe Market Place Off-site
sewer.
Developer: Wyndham Properties, Inc.
Contractor: Lyttle Utilities, Inc.
Total Contract Cost:
Total Estimated County Cost:
(Refund through connection fees)
Estimated Developer Cost:
Number of Connections: Future
Code: 5N-2511-997
$35,902.15
$24,827.60
$11,074.55
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Abstention: Mr. Mayes.
ll.E.3.d. CONTRACT FOR GENITO ROAD WATER LINE
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to
execute any necessary documents awarding Contract Number
W86-182B for construction of a 12" water line along Genito
Road, to H. Hamner Gay and Company, Inc., in the amount of
$39,381.20, for the purpose of increasing water supplies to the
Clarendon and Southridge Subdivision areas to meet fire and
domestic requirements. (It is noted this project is funded
from the Capital Improvement Budget for replacement and upgrad-
ing of old water lines.)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Abstention: Mr. Mayes.
87-394
ll.E.3.e. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG OLD BUCKINGHAM ROAD FROM
VILLAGE ASSOCIATES
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to
execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf
of the County, the conveyance of a variable width strip of land
along Old Buckingham Road from Village Associates, a Virginia
General Partnership. (A copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Abstention: Mr. Mayes.
ll.E.3.f. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG BRANCHWAY ROAD FROM GEORGE
B. SOWERS~ JR. AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to
execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf
of the County, the conveyance of a 15' strip of land along
Branchway Road from George B. Sowers, Jr. and Associates, Inc.
(A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Abstention: Mr. Mayes.
ll.E.3.~. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG OSBORNE ROAD FROM MOR
DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board
approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to
execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf
of the County, the conveyance of a variable width strip of land
along Osborne Road from MOR Development Associates, a Virginia
General Partnership. (A copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Abstention: Mr. Mayes.
11 . E . 4 . REPORTS
Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report on the developer
water and sewer contracts executed by the Acting County Admin-
istrator.
ll.F. REPORTS
Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a status report on the
General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road
Reserve Funds, District Road and Street Light Funds, Lease
Purchases and School Literary Loans.
Mr. Ramsey stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has
formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following
streets into the State Secondary Road System:
ADDITIONS
LENGTH
MILL CREEK - SECTION 1
Route 3456 (Lalonde Drive) - From Route 1155
to 0.07 mile east of Route 3457
0.13 Mi.
Route 3457 (Lalonde Place) - From Route 3456
to a south cul-de-sac
0.04 Mi.
87-395
GLEN OAKS - SECTIONS 1 AND 2
Route 3585 (Glen Oaks Drive) - From Route 717
to 0.01 mile south of Route 3586
Route 3586 (Hamlin Drive) - From Route 3585
to 0.02 mile south of Route 3589
Route 3587 (Hamlin Place) - From Route 3586
to a north cul-de-sac
Route 3588 (Shumark Drive) - From Route 3586
to an east cul-de-sac
Route 3589 (Hamlin Court) - From Route 3586
to a west cul-de-sac
0.05 Mi.
0.25 Mi.
0.04 Mi.
0.18 Mi.
0.03 Mi.
7.D. DONATION OF "BICENTENNIAL BOOKSHELF" BY FRIENDS OF THE
LIBRARY
Mr. Masden indicated Ms. Sarah Marable, representing the
Friends of the Library, was present to present the Board with
the donation for the "Bicentennial Bookshelf" from the Friends
of the Library and the National Endowment for the Humanities.
The Board expressed appreciation to Ms. Marable for this
thoughtful donation to the County and its citizens.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
accepted and appropriated gifts of $500 from Friends of the
Library and $500 from the National Endowment for the Humanities
for the purpose of establishing a collection of books on the
subject of the U.S. Constitution, the purpose of the collection
being to celebrate the bicentennial of the signing of the U.S.
Constitution.
Vote: Unanimous
11 .G.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board went
into Executive Session to discuss Personnel Matters; Condition,
Acquisition or Use of Real Property for Public Purposes or the
Disposition of Publicly Held Property; and Legal Matters
pertaining to the Airport Restaurant Lease, pursuant to Sec-
tions 2.1-344 (a) (1), (2) and (6), respectively, of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
Mr. Daniel welcomed Ms. Grace Webb, Ms. Carolyn Gwaltney and
their fourth grade Social Studies students from Chalkley
Elementary School, who were present to observe the Board of
Supervisors meeting. Mr. Daniel stated that the morning
session had been completed. There was an exchange of introduc-
tions between the Board members and the students.
Mr. Applegate informed the Board he would not be present at the
afternoon session of the meeting as he would be out of town.
He stated he had left a statement with the Chairman which he
had requested be recorded in the minutes, with respect to Case
87S056.
87-396
ll.H. LUNCH
The Board recessed to travel to the Airport Crosswinds Restau-
rant for lunch.
Reconvening:
11 .I.
REQUEST FOR MOBILE HOME PERMIT
87SR036
In Matoaca Magisterial District, R.J. ELLIS requested renewal
of Mobile Home Permit 85SR087 to park a mobile home on property
fronting the east and west line of Hillview Street, approxi-
mately 270 feet south of Mahone Street, and better known as
21613 Hillview Street. Tax Map 186-3 (2) Augustus Wright, Lot
23 (Sheet 52). The first permit was issued July 1974.
Mr. Jacobson stated, at the February 25, 1987 meeting, the
Board deferred this request for ninety (90) days to allow Mrs.
Joyce Rowland, daughter of the applicant, time to sell and
remove the mobile home from the site. He stated since that
time Mrs. Rowland has requested withdrawal of the request. He
stated staff recommends approval of withdrawal of the request.
No one came forward to represent the request.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board accept-
ed withdrawal of this request.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, and Mr. Dodd.
Absent: Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
ll.J. REZONING REQUESTS
86S148
In Matoaca Magisterial District, ERA HUNT REALTORS requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) on an 18.8
acre parcel fronting approximately 795 feet on the west line of
Qualla Road, approximately 130 feet south of Ridgerun Road.
Tax Map 63-7 (1) Parcel 3 (Sheet 21).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of the request, subject to a single condition and acceptance
of the proffered condition.
Mr. Ron Hunt, representing the applicant, stated the recommend-
ed condition was acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approv-
ed Case 86S148, subject to the following condition:
A fifty (50) foot building setback line and buffer, exclu-
sive of utility easements, shall be provided on all lots
adjacent to Qualla Road. The area within this buffer
shall be planted and/or left in its natural state if there
is sufficient vegetation to provide a~equate screening.
No individual lot access to Qualla Road is permitted.
Within thirty (30) days of tentative subdivision approval,
the developer should flag this buffer for inspection by
the Planning Department. If sufficient vegetation does
not exist, a landscaping plan shall be approved by the
Planning Department and a bond posted to cover the cost of
87-397
implementing the plan prior to recordation. This building
line and buffer shall be noted on final check and record
plats. The Planning Commission may amend this condition
at the time of tentative subdivision approval. (P)
And further, the Board accepted the following proffered condi-
tion:
Ail lots adjacent to Section 4 of Sunnybrook will have a
minimum of 9,000 square feet and the remaining lots will
have a minimum of 12,000 square feet.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes and Mr. Dodd.
Absent: Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone.
Mrs. Girone returned to the meeting.
87S020
In Matoaca Magisterial District, DOUGLAS R. SOWERS requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9) on a 92.5
acre parcel fronting approximately 850 feet on the north line
of Bailey Bridge Road, approximately 3,800 feet southwest of
Quailwood Road, also located at the eastern terminus of Master
Stag Drive. Tax Map 76-6 (1) Parcel 1 (Sheet 20).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-9 and
R-15), subject to a single condition and acceptance of the
proffered conditions 2 and 3. He stated proffered conditions 2
and 3 will help to ensure an appropriate transition of lot
sizes from the smaller lots in Deer Run Subdivision to the
larger lots along Bailey Bridge Road. He noted that proffered
condition 1 will not be necessary if the eastern portion of the
site is zoned R-15.
Mr. Don Balzer, representing the applicant, stated the recom-
mended conditions were acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
There was discussion relative to the requested rezoning for
Residential (R-9) for this site in relation to other develop-
ments in the general area; concerns about maintaining quality
development throughout the entire area; the recommendation of
the Powhite/Route 288 Development Area Land Use and Transporta-
tion Plan that there be a transition from medium density
residential to low density residential in the area and how the
applicant's request for Residential (R-9) zoning complies with
the plan; concerns relative to compatibility with adjacent
developments; if the concerns raised by an adjacent property
owner relative to sewer extension across her.property had been
resolved; the size of the parcel and the number of lots that
could be developed; etc.
Mr. Balzer explained that Deer Run Subdivision is zoned R-12
with Conditional Use Planned Development that would allow lots
as small as 10,000 square feet and Triple Crown Subdivision is
zoned R-12 with lots that range from 12,500 square feet to
29,900 square feet. He stated staff is of the opinion that
area development should continue in a similar fashion to Deer
Run and Triple Crown and should transition to larger lot sizes
as the development approaches Bailey Bridge Road.
Mr. Daniel and Mr. Mayes expressed concerns that surrounding
areas are zoned R-12 and R-15 and questioned why R-9 zoning
would be considered appropriate for this particular parcel.
Mr. Balzer stated that, although the request is for R-9 classi-
fication, the applicant has proffered conditions which will
ensure that the site will be developed to higher standards.
Mrs. Girone stated that there are times when a developer has to
87-398
deal with property that is difficult to develop (i.e., drain-
age, steep slopes, deep ravines, etc.) and in order to develop
that land, the developer will request a rezoning classification
that allows flexibility in designing the layout of the proper-
ty, etc., and, in addition, will proffer conditions that will
ensure the property will be developed to standards higher than
those of the requested zoning classification.
Mr. Mayes questioned if the request conforms to the density
requirement of the applicable land use plan. Mr. Jacobson
stated the land use plan suggests medium density residential
development for the northwestern portion of the subject proper-
ty (1.51 to 4.00 units per acre) and the proposed development,
with acceptance of the proffered conditions, would be developed
at approximately 2 to 3 unitS per acre and does follow the
planned density requirements for this area and is consistent
with the land use plan.
Mr. Daniel stated he felt the R-15 zoning within 700 feet of
Bailey Bridge Road was compatible and acceptable; however, he
did not find the reduction to R-12 zoning to the west, within
the parcel compatible and felt that the center portion of the
parcel should also be R-15. He further stated that he felt the
western portion of the site should be zoned R-12 unless the
applicant could suggest development constraints that would
require smaller lots. Mr. Balzer stated the developer has
devised a tentative plan for development that would yield
approximately two (2) to three (3) housing units per acre for
Residential (R-9) with the proffered conditions of 10,000 and
12,000 square foot minimum lots. He stated this plan is based
primarily on the topography of the site which ranges from
gently sloping to moderately steep slopes, deep ravines, etc.
Mrs. Girone stated this plan is in compliance with that which
is suggested by the land use plan and responds to the needs of
the uneven terrain. She stated, in addition, the applicant has
proffered conditions of square footage to ensure that the
houses are not substandard, incompatible, etc., with existing
development. Mr. Balzer stated he felt the requested zoning of
R-9 with a proffered condition for a minimum of 10,000 square
foot lots, R-9 with a proffered condition for a minimum of
12,000 square foot lots and R-15 are appropriate transitions of
zoning for this parcel and adjacent area properties. He stated
the only opposition to the proposed development has been the
objection of Dr. and Mrs. Henry to a sewer easement across
their property and that situation had been resolved. He
presented Mr. Mayes with a copy of a letter from Dr. and Mrs.
Henry. Mr. Mayes stated he had a problem with the requested
zoning due to his concerns about density in the area. He
stated he would be more comfortable with the project if the
parcel, beginning from west to east, were to transition from
R-12 to R-15 to R-15 which he felt would be compatible with the
existing surrounding areas. Mr. Balzer stated he felt the
requested zoning, with the proffered conditions, complied with
that requirement and was compatible with adjacent development.
Mr. Dodd stated he understood what the developer is attempting
to accomplish, as such development has transpired in his
district; however, he stated he felt the primary concern of the
Board is that this particular parcel is extremely large and R-9
development on this property would constitute high density
development even though there are proffered conditions to
ensure appropriate transitioning.
Mrs. Girone inquired if there had been an opposition voiced by
the residents of Deer Run Subdivision. Mr. Balzer stated that
the only opposition had been from staff when the request was
originally submitted and those concerns were resolved prior to
the case being presented to the Planning Commission and that
there had been no opposition voiced by residents from Deer Run
Subdivision.
Mr. Daniel stated the Board must consider the existing amount
and type of zoning in the area; how much vacant land surrounds
87-399
this parcel; how the vacant land will be affected by the
Board's decision on this property, etc. He stated, considering
those factors, he concurred with Mr. Mayes that the zoning
combination of R-12/R-15/R-15 is appropriate for this particu-
lar parcel and would represent the direction of future zoning
in the area.
Mrs. Girone stated the proposed development is in compliance
with the requirements of the applicable land use plan and the
topography of the land is a factor in determining how the
project can be developed (i.e., number of lots, size of lots,
frontage, etc.) and she felt some flexibility should be allowed
to deal with the terrain. She stated the developer could have
asked for only R-9 zoning and probably received approval of the
request; however, he had proffered conditions to ensure a
quality and properly transitioned development. She stated she
felt the project had been well worked out and the request
represents the applicant's efforts toward working with staff
for a compatible, quality development.
Mr. Daniel stated he was not comfortable with the way in which
the request had been presented. Mr. Mayes stated the existing
area residential development is zoned R-15 and R-12 and he felt
the requested R-9 zoning was neither compatible with nor
comparable to existing area development and adjacent subdivi-
sions and he was not comfortable with the situation with
respect to the sewer easement across the Henry property. He
stated this tract of land is large and, in his opinion, should
be zoned R-12/R-15/R-15. Mr. Dodd inquired if Mr. Mayes would
be comfortable with the R-15 zoning as presented (eastern site)
and R-12 on the two remaining tracts (center and western sites)
presented as R-9 with proffered conditions in order to move the
request forward. Mr. Mayes stated he would be willing to
compromise as per Mr. Dodd's suggestion for R-12/R-12/R-15, if
it were agreeable to the applicant's representative and, if
not, he would prefer to defer the request for further study.
Mr. Balzer stated he could prefer to have the request approved
as submitted as it is compatible with existing area develop-
ment.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board defer-
red consideration of Case 87S020 until June 24, 1987.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
86S092 (Amended)
In Midlothian Magisterial District, NAPIER & COMPANY AND HEALTH
QUEST CORPORATION requested rezoning from Residential (R-40) to
Convenience Business (B-l) on 9.2 acres, with Conditional Use
Planned Development on this tract and a 3.0 acre tract current-
ly zoned Convenience Business (B-l). This request lies on a
total of 12.2 acres fronting approximately 1010 feet on the
south line of Robious Road, northwest of Huguenot Road. Tax
Map 8-16 (1) Parcels 2, 3, and 4 (Sheet 2).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request, subject to certain conditions and
acceptance of the applicant's proffered condition.
Mr. Gary Patterson, the applicant's representative, stated the
recommended conditions were acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
Mrs. Girone expressed concern relative to Condition 12.b.2. and
inquired if the applicant would object to reapplying for
consideration of uses for Tract A other than a nursing home and
customary accessory uses at a future time. She stated this
site is a very sensitive site with many constraints and it took
a long time to work it out and she felt the nursing home would
87-400
be an advantage to the neighborhood. She stated she would
prefer not to deal with other uses for this tract at this time
other than the nursing home and customary accessory uses. Mr.
Patterson stated he did not have a problem with Mrs. Girone's
request to delete Condition 12.b.2.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 86S092, subject to the following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Health Quest Development Corporation Design Group
and the Textual Statement submitted with the application
shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
Public water and sewer shall be used. Public sewer shall
be extended from the existing trunk sewer line along
Murray Drive. In conjunction with schematic plan review,
a hydraulic analysis of the existing eight (8) inch sewer
line shall be submitted to the Utilities Department for
approval. Prior to release of any building permit, ade-
quate sewer capacity, as required by the Utilities De-
partment, shall be provided. (U)
3. Setbacks and Buffers.
(a)
In conjunction with the approval of this request, a
twenty (20) foot exception to the fifty (50) foot
parking setback requirement along Robious Road shall
be granted, as measured from the existing right of
way of Robious Road. The setback shall be measured
from the existing right of way of Robious Road,
exclusive of the irregularly shaped "right of way
boxes" depicted on the Master Plan. Within the
southernmost twenty (20) feet of this setback, and
within the non-paved areas between the proposed
driveway parallel to Robious Road and the buildings
and parking areas south of this driveway, trees and
shrubs of sufficient height and density shall be
planted to minimize the visibility of paved areas
from Robious Road. At a minimum, landscaping shall
be accomplished in accordance with Condition 4 (f)
(i).
(b)
In conjunction with the approval of this request, a
twenty (20) foot exception to the twenty (20) foot
side yard setback and a thirty (30) foot exception to
the thirty (30) foot rear yard setback for buildings,
as reflected on the Master Plan, shall be granted.
(c)
Between the proposed parking, driveways and build-
ings, and the adjacent entrance/exit driveway for the
Briarwood Wellness Center, vegetation within this
setback shall be supplemented with landscaping to
minimize the view of driveways and parking areas from
residential properties to the west and provide
year-round screening. At a minimum, landscaping
shall be accomplished in accordance with Condition 4
(f) (2).
Prior to rough clea~ing and grading, a conceptual
landscaping plan depicting these requirements shall
be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval.
A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval in conjunction with
final site plan review. (P)
4. Landscaping Requirements.
(a) Purpose and Intent.
A comprehensive landscaping program for the site is
essential for the visual enhancement of the property;
and to protect and promote the appearance, character,
87-401
and economic value of the property and surrounding
neighborhoods. The purpose and intent of such land-
scaping requirements is also to reduce the visibility
of paved areas from adjacent properties and streets,
moderate climatic effects, minimize noise and glare,
and enhance public safety by defining spaces to
influence traffic movement. Landscaping will reduce
the amount of storm water runoff and provide transi-
tion between neighboring properties.
(b) Landscaping Plan and Planting Requirements.
(1)
A landscaping plan shall be submitted in con-
junction with site plan review.
(2)
Such landscaping plan shall be drawn to scale,
including dimensions and distances, and clearly
delineate all existing and proposed parking
spaces or other vehicle areas, access aisles,
driveways, and the location, size and descrip-
tion of all landscaping materials.
(c) Plant Materials Specifications.
(1) Quality.
Ail plant materials shall be living and in a
healthy condition. Plant materials used in
conformance with the provision of these speci-
fications shall conform to the standards of the
most recent edition of the "American Standard
for Nursery Stock," published by the American
Association of Nurserymen.
(2) Size and Type.
(a)
Small Deciduous Trees. Small deciduous
trees shall be of a species having an
average minimum mature crown spread of
greater than twelve (12) feet. A minimum
caliper of at least two and one-half (2
1/2) inches at the time of planting shall
be required.
(b)
Large Deciduous Trees. Large deciduous
trees shall be of a species having an
average minimum mature crown spread of
greater than thirty (30) feet. A minimum
caliper of at least three and one-half (3
1/2) inches at the time of planting shall
be required.
(c)
Evergreen trees. Evergreen trees shall
have a minimum height of five (5) feet at
the time of planting.
(d)
Medium shrubs. Shrubs and hedge forms
shall have a minimum height of two (2) feet
at the time of planting.
(3) Landscaping Design.
(a)
Generally, planting required by this sec-
tion should be in an irregular line and
spaced at random.
(b)
Clustering of plant and tree species shall
be required to provide a pleasing composi-
tion and mix of vegetation.
(c)
Decorative walls and fences may be inte-
grated into any landscaping program. The
use of such walls or fences, when having a
87-402
(d)
(e)
(f)
minimum height of three (3) feet, may
reduce the amount of required plant mate-
rials at the discretion of the Director of
Planning.
(4) Tree Preservation.
(a)
Preservation of existing trees is en-
couraged to provide continuity, improved
buffering ability, pleasing scale and image
on the property.
(b)
Any healthy existing tree may be included
for credit towards the requirements of this
Condition.
Maintenance.
(1)
The owner, or his agent, shall be responsible
for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of
all landscaping materials as may be required.
(2)
Ail plant material shall be tended and main-
tained in a healthy growing condition and free
from refuse and debris at all times. All un-
healthy, dying or dead plant materials shall be
replaced during the next planting season.
(3)
Ail landscaped areas shall be provided with a
readily available water supply. The utilization
of underground storage chambers to collect
runoff to be later used to irrigate plant mate-
rials is encouraged.
Installation and Bonding Requirements.
Ail landscaping shall be installed in a sound,
workmanship-like manner and according to accept-
ed, good planting practices and procedures.
Landscaped areas shall require protection from
vehicular encroachment by such means as, but not
limited to, wheel stops or concrete or
bituminous curbs.
(2)
Where landscaping is required, no certificate of
occupancy shall be issued until the required
landscaping is completed in accordance with the
approved landscape plan. When the occupancy of
a structure is desired prior to the completion
of the required landscaping, a certificate of
occupancy may be issued only if the owner or
developer provides to the County a form of
surety satisfactory to the Planning Department
in an amount equal to the costs of the remaining
plant materials, related materials and installa-
tion costs.
(3)
Ail required landscaping shall be installed and
approved by the first planting season following
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the
bond shall be forfeited to the County.
Perimeter Landscaping.
(i)
At a minimum, landscaping shall be provided
along Robious Road as follows:
(a)
At least one large deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen tree for~each thirty lineal feet
shall be planted within the setback area.
(b) At least one small deciduous tree for each
87-403
(g)
thirty lineal feet shall be planted within
the setback area.
(c)
At least one medium shrub for each ten
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(d)
Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
OR:
(a)
A minimum four (4)
berm, and
foot high undulating
(b)
At least one large deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen for each thirty lineal feet shall
be planted within the setback area.
(c)
At least one small deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet shall be planted within
the setback area.
(d)
At least one medium shrub for each fifteen
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(e)
Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
(2)
At a minimum, landscaping shall be provided
within the setback between the proposed parking,
driveways and buildings, and the adjacent
entrance/exit driveway for the Briarwood
Wellness Center as follows:
(a)
At least one small deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen for each fifty lineal feet shall
be planted within the setback area.
(b)
At least one medium shrub for each twenty
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(c)
Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
Landscaping Standards for Parking Areas.
(1) Interior parking area landscaping.
(a)
The parking area shall have at least twenty
(20) square feet of interior landscaping
for each space. Each required landscaped
area shall contain a minimum of 100 square
feet and have a minimum dimension of at
least ten feet.
(b)
The primary landscaping material in the
parking areas shall be trees which provide
shade or are capable of providing shade at
maturity. Each landscaped area shall
include at least one small tree. The total
number of trees shall not be less than one
for each 200 square feet, or fraction
thereof, of required interior landscaped
area. The remaining area shall be land-
scaped with shrubs and other vegetative
material to complement the tree landscap-
ing.
87-404
10.
Landscaped areas shall be reasonably dis-
persed throughout, located so as to divide
and break up the expanse of paving. The
area designated as required setbacks shall
not be calculated as required landscaped
area. (p)
Ail utility lines such as electric, telephone, CATV, or
other similar lines shall be installed underground. All
junction and access boxes shall be screened with appropri-
ate landscaping. All utility pad fixtures and meters
shall be shown on the site plan. The necessity for utili-
ty connections, meter boxes, etc., shall be recognized and
integrated with the architectural elements of the site
plan· (P)
The proposed nursing home shall have an architectural
style and utilize materials as depicted in the renderings
and described in the Textual Statement submitted with the
application. Architectural treatment of all building
facades for the nursing home and all other buildings
(whether front, side, or rear) shall not consist of archi-
tectural materials of inferior quality, appearance, or
detail to any other facade of the same building. The
intent of this requirement is not to preclude the use of
different materials on different building facades (which
would be acceptable if representative of good architec-
tural design) but rather, to preclude the use of inferior
materials on sides which face adjoining property and thus,
might adversely impact existing or future development
causing a substantial depreciation of property values. No
portion of a building constructed of unadorned cinder
block or corrugated and/or sheet metal shall be visible
from Robious Road or adjacent properties. Mechanical
equipment, whether ground-level or rooftop, shall be
shielded and screened from public view and designed to be
perceived as an integral part of the building. Elevations
depicting these requirements shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval in conjunction with site
plan review. (P)
Exterior lighting shall be arranged and installed so that
the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5
foot candles above background measured at the lot line
adjoining Robious Road and the adjacent properties.
Lighting standards shall be of a directional type capable
of shielding the light source from direct view. A light-
ing plan depicting these requirements shall be submitted
to the Planning Department for approval in conjunction
with site plan review. (P)
Driveways and parking areas shall be paved with concrete,
bituminous concrete, or other similar material. Surface
treated parking areas and drives shall be prohibited.
Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the
perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. Drainage
shall be designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian
traffic. (P&EE)
The loading areas shall be designed and located so as not
to be visible from adjacent properties or from public
rights of way. (P)
Except as noted herein, signs shall comply with the re-
quirements of the "Special Sign District" for Convenience
Business (B-l) Districts. Also, one (1) freestanding sign
shall be permitted along Robious Road to identify the
Briarwood Wellness Center. The Briarwood Wellness Center
sign shall not exceed an aggregate area of sixty (60)
square feet, a height of fifteen (15) feet, and shall
comply with "Special Sign District" regulations relative
to setbacks and lighting. (p)
87-405
11.
The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation showing existing drainage and the
impact this development will have on the surrounding area.
The developer shall submit a construction plan to En-
vironmental Engineering providing for on-site and off-site
drainage facilities. The plan shall be approved by the
Environmental Engineering Department and VDOT, and all
necessary easements shall be obtained prior to any
vegetative disturbance. The approved off-site plan may
have to be implemented prior to clearing. (EE)
12.
(a)
In addition to Office Business (0) uses, the follow-
ing uses shall be permitted within Tract A (i.e.,
easternmost tract):
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Banks
Clothes stores
Florist shops
Optometrists sales and service
Savings and loan associations
Specialty shops.
Provided that all retail uses shall be limited to a
maximum of thirty (30) percent of the gross floor
area of any floor within any structure and that such
uses do not occupy separate entrance units in a
typical, strip-type building.
(b)
The following uses shall be permitted within Tract B
(i.e., westernmost tract):
A nursing home and customary accessory uses only.
(ss)
13.
Additional pavement, curb, and gutter shall be constructed
along Robious Road to accommodate a right-turn lane at the
proposed direct entrance/exit. (T)
(Note: Prior to obtaining final site plan approval or
building permits, schematic plans must be submitted to the
Planning Commission for approval.)
And further, the Board accepted the following proffered condi-
tion:
Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, ten feet (10')
of right of way, measured from the edge of the existing
right of way of Robious Road shall be dedicated to and for
the County of Chesterfield, free and unrestricted.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
87S035
In Matoaca Magisterial District, IRONBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15)
of 27 acres and Convenience Business (B-l) of 4 acres with
Conditional Use Planned Development, rezoning from Residential
(R-15) to Convenience Business (B-l) of approximately 16 acres,
plus amendment to Conditional Use Planned Development (Case
86S097) on approximately 354 acres. This request fronts
approximately 4,460 feet on Iron Bridge Road opposite Lewis
Road. Tax Map 114-2 (1) Parcels 1 and 2 and Tax Map 114-6 (1)
Parcel 1 and Part of Parcel 3 (Sheet 31).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Glen Moore, the applicant's representative, stated the
recommended conditions were acceptable.
87-406
Mr. Ted Patrick, an adjacent property owner, voiced concern
that Condition 5 does not specifically indicate his name as the
person/owner of Parcel 1 on Tax Map 96-14 (1) to be notified of
the time and date of any schematic and/or tentative subdivision
considerations and requested that the condition be modified to
stipulate that any or all changes that are to be made be done
by certified mail and by name, not by the wording "owner of the
parcel". He stated he would be in opposition to the request if
the proposed north/south collector road did not provide access
to his property and/or if public water and sewer lines or
easements are not extended to his site.
Mr. Jacobson stated the proposed north/south collector road
will provide access to Mr. Patrick's property and, when the
Planning Commission deals with the subdivision layout, Mr.
Patrick will be notified. He stated, at that time, the Utili-
ties Department will know best how to serve Mr. Patrick's land
in conjunction with the Ironbridge Development and Mr. Pat-
rick's concerns will be addressed through the process. He
stated the Ironbridge Development plan will provide access both
for utilities and the roadway to Mr. Patrick's property. Mr.
Jacobson stated staff is of the opinion that Mr. Patrick's
concerns will be addressed and satisfied through the Planning
Commission's imposition of Condition 5.
Mr. Patrick stated he was previously approached by both Mr.
Cole and the developers of the Ironbridge Development with
respect to purchasing his property and when he declined to sell
they proceeded with their plans without proper notification to
him of their intentions. He stated for this reason and his
personal protection he wishes to be notified by certified mail
of any changes that may transpire in the plans for development
of this project.
Mr. Daniel stated that as long as the property is identified as
described in Condition 5 and belongs to Mr. Patrick, he felt
there is sufficient protection and a strong commitment that no
action will transpire by the County that will leave Mr. Patrick
helpless or with no recourse for action.
Mr. Dodd inquired if this request is to rezone the portion of
the property recently purchased from the County. Mr. Jacobson
stated Request I is to rezone the northwest portion of the
property to permit single family residential and limited office
development; Request II is to rezone from residential to office
development for the location of a major office complex and
changes the transition from the office to single family develop-
ment; and Request III requests detailed adjustments because the
north/south arterial is being relocated through the Ironbridge
Development. He stated the standards of zoning and conditions
imposed on this request previously are not being reduced in any
way.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approv-
ed rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15) and
Convenience Business (B-l) with Conditional Use Planned Deve-
lopment; amended Conditional Use Planned Development (Case
86S097) on approximately 354 acres to permit adjustments in
area acreages and uses; and approved rezoning from Residential
(R-15) to Convenience Business (B-l), subject to the following
conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Higgins and Associates, dated April 6, 1987, and
the Textual Statement dated August 6, 1986, and Textual
Statement dated April 8, 1987, shall be considered the
Master Plan. (P)
There shall be a design compensation in the lake to ac-
count for the increased storm water inflow which will
result from the development change of Tract J-2 from
Residential (R-15) to Convenience Business (B-l). (EE)
87-407
An eighty (80) foot right of way shall be dedicated for
the extension of the collector road through the area known
as the Additional Acreage. (T)
The developer shall be responsible for construction of the
collector road through his property. (T)
The developer shall notify the owner of Parcel 1 on Tax
Map 96-14 (1) of the time and date of any schematic and/or
tentative subdivision consideration. (CPC)
(Note: Ail previously imposed conditions of Zoning Case
86S097 are still in full force and effect.)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
87S038
In Dale Magisterial District, RONALD C. WHEELER requested
Conditional Use Planned Development to permit office use and
bulk exceptions in an Agricultural (A) District on a 1.6 acre
parcel fronting approximately 164 feet on the east line of Iron
Bridge Road, approximately 240 feet north of Kingsland Road.
Tax Map 66-13 (1) Parcel 27 (Sheet 22).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Ronald Wheeler stated the recommended conditions were
acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S038, subject to the following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan submit-
ted with the application shall be considered the Master
Plan. (P)
This Conditional Use Planned Development shall be limited
to use of the existing structure for professional offices.
Outside storage shall not be permitted. (P)
This Conditional Use Planned Development shall be granted
for a period not to exceed three (3) years from date of
approval. At the end of three (3) years, this time period
may be extended through schematic plan review. (P)
Other than normal maintenance or cosmetic improvements, no
additions shall be permitted to accommodate this use. The
residential appearance of the structure shall be maintain-
ed. (p)
The driveway and parking areas shall be graveled with a
minimum of six (6) inches of #21 or #2lA stone. All
graveled parking areas and driveway areas shall be delin-
eated by permanent means (i.e. concrete bumper blocks,
timbers, etc.) (P)
Driveway and parking areas shall be screened from view of
adjacent property to the south and east. Screening may
consist of a solid board fence and/or vegetation. The
exact method of screening shall be determined at the time
of site plan review. (P)
Signs shall be as regulated by the Zoning Ordinance for
the "Route 10 Special Sign District" for Office Business
(O) zoning· (P)
8. In conjunction with the approval of this request, the
87-408
Planning Commission shall grant schematic plan approval of
the Master Plan. (P)
(Note: Prior to any site improvements, site plans must be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
87S040
In Dale Magisterial District, GEORGE K. AND NORMA JEAN KCRAGET
requested a Conditional Use to permit a cabinet and mill
workshop in a Light Industrial (M-l) District on a 2.5 acre
parcel fronting approximately 80 feet on the west line of
Virginia Pine Court, approximately 1,050 feet northwest of
Whitepine Road. Tax Map 79-6 (3) Industrial Park, Part of Lot
11 (Sheet 22).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of this request.
Mr. George Kcraget stated the recommendation was acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd,
approved Case 87S040.
the Board
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
87S041
In Dale Magisterial District, BUTLER INSURANCE AGENCY requested
rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (O) with
Conditional Use Planned Development on a 3.9 acre parcel
fronting approximately 570 feet on the west line of Iron Bridge
Road, approximately 1,700 feet north of Whitepine Road. Tax
Map 79-4 (1) Parcels 12, 13, 14, and 17 (Sheet 22).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Frank Butler stated the recommended conditions, with the
exception of Condition 1, were acceptable. He requested that
the condition be amended so that he would not have to pave
parking and driveway areas until such time as there is develop-
ment of additional office space. He stated he does not intend
further expansion of the business in the future and feels that,
if no additional office space has occurred by the end of that
three (3) year period, he should not be required to pave the
driveway and parking areas at that time. He stated that if any
further development occurs new master plans, etc. would have to
be submitted for approval and any improvements made at this
time would be irrelevant.
A brief discussion occurred relative to leaving the property
zoned Agricultural (A) and granting a Conditional Use for
office development, the possibility of refunding a portion of
the application fee, granting of easements, etc. The applicant
indicated he would prefer to have the site zoned according to
the recommendation with the change in Condition 1.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S041, subject to the following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Dean E. Hawkins, ASLA, dated February 10, 1987,
shall be considered the Master Plan for conversion of the
existing residence to an office. The Planning Commission
87-409
shall grant schematic plan approval of the February 10,
1987, Master Plan.
In conjunction with the approval of this request, an
exception to the requirement that parking and driveway
areas be paved shall be granted until additional office
space is developed. Non-paved parking areas shall be
graveled with a minimum of six (6) inches of #21 or #2lA
stone. Graveled parking areas and driveway areas shall be
delineated by permanent means (i.e., concrete bumper
blocks, timbers, etc.).
The driveways and parking areas shall be screened from
view of the adjacent residence to the south. The method
of screening shall be approved by the Planning Department
at the time of site plan review.
Prior to development of additional office space, the site
shall be brought into compliance with all conditions
stated herein. At that time, an overall Master Plan which
conforms to the conditions stated herein shall be
submitted to the Planning Commission for approval. (P)
(Note: Prior to any site improvements, to accommodate
conversion of the residence, site plans must be submitted
to the Planning Department for approval.)
Yard and Height Requirements.
(a) Yards. The following yard requirement shall apply:
(i)
Setbacks along major arterials. Ail buildings
and drives shall have a minimum seventy-five
foot setback from the proposed rights-of-way of
major arterials as indicated on the Chesterfield
General Plan, as amended. Parking areas shall
have a minimum one hundred foot setback from
proposed rights-of-way of major arterials. The
parking area setback may be reduced to seventy-
five feet when parking areas are located to the
side or rear of buildings. Within these set-
backs, landscaping shall be provided in accor-
dance with Condition 9.
(2)
(3)
Side yards. The side yard setbacks for build-
ings, drives, and parking areas shall be a
minimum of thirty feet. The minimum corner side
yard shall be forty feet. One foot shall be
added to each side yard for each three feet that
the building height adjacent thereto exceeds
forty-five feet or three stories, whichever is
less, subject, however, to the provisions of
Section 21-27 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Rear yard. The minimum rear yard setback for
buildings, drives, and parking areas shall be
forty feet. One foot shall be added to each
rear yard for each three feet that the building
height adjacent thereto exceeds forty-five feet
or three stories, whichever is less, subject,
however, to the provisions of Section 21-27 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
(b) Height requirements.
The maximum height of all buildings shall be as
permitted by Section 21-38 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Special height restrictions may apply because of
Airport height restrictions. (p)
87-410
Permitted Variations in Yard Requirements.
The required minimum yards may be reduced with the pro-
vision of additional landscaping:
(1)
Setbacks along major arterials. The required setback
for buildings and drives along major arterials may be
reduced to fifty (50) feet with the provision of
landscaping in accordance with Condition 9,
"Perimeter Landscaping C." The required setback for
parking areas may be reduced to fifty (50) feet with
the provision of landscaping in accordance with
Condition 9, "Perimeter Landscaping C," and when such
parking areas are located to the side and rear of
buildings.
(2)
Side yard. The required side yard may be reduced to
ten (10) feet with the provision of landscaping in
accordance with Condition 9, "Perimeter Landscaping
B" (except when adjacent to any "A", "R", "R-TH" or
"R-MF" District).
(3)
Rear yard. The required rear yard may be reduced to
twenty (20) feet with the provision of landscaping in
accordance with Condition 9, "Perimeter Landscaping
B" (except when adjacent to any "A", "R", "R-TH" or
"R-MF" District). (P)
Utility lines underground. Ail utility lines such as
electric, telephone, CATV, or other similar lines shall be
installed underground. This requirement shall apply to
lines serving individual sites as well as to utility lines
necessary within the project. All junction and access
boxes shall be screened with appropriate landscaping. All
utility pad fixtures and meters should be shown on the
site plan. The necessity for utility connections, meter
boxes, etc., should be recognized and integrated with the
architectural elements of the site plan. (P)
Loading areas. Sites shall be designed and buildings
shall be oriented so that loading areas are not visible
from any of the project perimeters adjoining any "A", "R",
"R-TH" or "R-MF" District or any public right-of-way. (P)
Architectural treatment. The exterior wall surfaces
(front, rear and sides) of each individual building visi-
ble from a public street shall be similar in architectural
treatment and materials. No block or metal buildings
shall be visible from any "A", "R", "R-TH" or "R-MF"
District or public right-of-way. All rooftop equipment
shall be shielded and screened from public view. (P)
Exterior lighting. Ail exterior lights shall be arranged
and installed so that the direct or reflected illumination
does not exceed 0.5 foot candles above background measured
at the lot line of any adjoining residential or agricul-
tural parcel or public right of way. Lighting standards
shall be of a directional type capable of shielding the
light source from direct view. (P)
Driveways and parking areas. Except as specified herein,
driveways and parking areas shall be paved with concrete,
bituminous concrete, or other similar material. Surface
treated parking areas and drives shall be prohibited.
Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the
perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. Drainage
shall be designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian
traffic. (P&EE)
Landscaping Requirements.
(a) Purpose and Intent.
87-411
Landscaping shall be provided for the visual enhance-
ment of the Corridor; and to protect and promote the
appearance, character, and economic values of land
along the Corridor and surrounding neighborhoods.
The purpose and intent of such landscaping require-
ments is also to reduce the visibility of paved areas
from adjacent properties and streets, moderate
climatic effects, minimize noise and glare, and
enhance public safety by defining spaces to influence
traffic movement. Landscaping will reduce the amount
of storm water runoff and provide transition between
neighboring properties.
(b) Landscaping Plan and Planting Requirements.
(i)
A landscaping plan shall be submitted for ap-
proval in conjunction with site plan review.
(2)
Such landscaping plan shall be drawn to scale,
including dimensions and distances, and clearly
delineate all existing and proposed parking
spaces or other vehicle areas, access aisles,
driveways, and the location, size and descrip-
tion of all landscaping materials.
(c) Plant Materials Specifications.
(1) Quality.
Ail plant materials shall be living and in a
healthy condition. Plant materials used in
conformance with the provision of these speci-
fications shall conform to the standards of the
most recent edition of the "American Standard
for Nursery Stock," published by the American
Association of Nurserymen.
(2) Size and Type.
(a)
Small Deciduous Trees. Small deciduous
trees shall be of a species having an
average minimum mature crown spread of
greater than twelve (12) feet. A minimum
caliper of at least two and one-half (2
1/2) inches at the time of planting shall
be required.
(b)
Large Deciduous Trees. Large deciduous
trees shall be of a species having an
average minimum mature crown spread of
greater than thirty (30) feet. A minimum
caliper of at least three and one-half (3
1/2) inches at the time of planting shall
be required.
(c)
Evergreen trees. Evergreen trees shall
have a minimum height of five (5) feet at
the time of planting.
(d)
Medium shrubs. Shrubs and hedge forms
shall have a minimum height of two (2) feet
at the time of planting.
(3) Landscaping Design.
(a)
Generally, planting required by this sec-
tion should be in an irregular line and
spaced at random.
(b)
Clustering of plant and tree species shall
be required to provide a pleasing composi-
tion and mix of vegetation.
87-412
(d)
(e)
(4)
(c)
Decorative walls and fences may be inte-
grated into any landscaping program. The
use of such walls or fences, when having a
minimum height of three (3) feet, may
reduce the amount of required plant mate-
rials at the discretion of the Director.
Tree Preservation.
(a)
Preservation of existing trees is en-
couraged to provide continuity, improved
buffering ability, pleasing scale and image
along the Corridor.
(b)
Any healthy existing tree may be included
for credit towards the requirements of this
condition.
Maintenance.
(1)
(2)
(3)
The owner, or his agent, shall be responsible
for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of
all landscaping materials as may be required.
Ail plant material shall be tended and main-
tained in a healthy growing condition and free
from refuse and debris at all times. All un-
healthy, dying or dead plant materials shall be
replaced during the next planting season.
Ail landscaped areas shall be provided with a
readily available water supply. The utilization
of underground storage chambers to collect
runoff to be later used to irrigate plant mate-
rials is encouraged.
Installation and Bonding Requirements.
(i)
Ail landscaping shall be installed in a sound,
workmanship-like manner and according to ac-
cepted, good planting practices and procedures.
Landscaped areas shall require protection from
vehicular encroachment by such means as, but not
limited to, wheel stops or concrete or bitumin-
ous curbs.
(2)
Where landscaping is required, no certificate of
occupancy shall be issued until the required
landscaping is completed in accordance with the
approved landscape plan. When the occupancy of
a structure is desired prior to the completion
of the required landscaping, a certificate of
occupancy may be issued only if the owner or
developer provides to the County a form of
surety satisfactory to the Planning Department
in an amount equal to the costs of the remaining
plant materials, related materials and installa-
tion costs.
(3)
Ail required landscaping shall be installed and
approved by the first planting season following
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the
bond shall be forfeited to the County.
(f) Arterial Frontage Landscaping.
Landscaping shall be required along Route 10 within
the required setback of any lot or parcel and shall
be provided except where driveways or other openings
may be necessary. The minimum required landscaping
for this setback shall be provided as per "Perimeter
Landscaping B" below.
87-413
(g) Perimeter Landscaping.
Landscaping shall be required at the outer boundaries
or in the required yards of a lot or parcel and shall
be provided except where driveways or other openings
may be required. The minimum required landscaping
for all outer boundaries of any lot or parcel shall
be provided as per "Perimeter Landscaping A" below.
There shall be different landscaping requirements as
identified herein, which shall be provided as
follows:
(1) Perimeter Landscaping A.
(a)
At least one small deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one
evergreen for each fifty lineal feet shall
be planted within the setback area.
(b)
At least one medium shrub for each twenty
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(c)
Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
(2) Perimeter Landscaping B.
(a)
At least one large deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one ever-
green for each thirty lineal feet shall be
planted within the setback area.
(b)
At least one small deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet shall be planted within
the setback area.
(c)
At least one medium shrub for each fifteen
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(d)
Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
OR:
(a)
A minimum three (3) foot high undulating
berm, and
(b) Perimeter Landscaping A.
(3) Perimeter Landscaping C.
(a)
At least one large deciduous tree for each
fifty lineal feet and at least one ever-
green tree for each thirty lineal feet
shall be planted within the setback area.
(b)
At least one small deciduous tree for each
thirty lineal feet shall be planted within
the setback area.
(c)
At least one medium shrub for each ten
lineal feet shall be planted within the
setback area.
(d)
Low shrubs and ground cover shall be rea-
sonably dispersed throughout.
OR:
(a)
A minimum four (4)
berm, and
foot high undulating
87-414
10.
11.
12.
(b) Perimeter Landscaping B.
(h) Landscaping Standards for Parking Areas.
(1) Interior parking area landscapinq.
(a)
Any parking area shall have at least twenty
(20) square feet of interior landscaping
for each space. Each required landscaped
area shall contain a minimum of 100 square
feet and have a minimum dimension of at
least ten feet. With the provision of this
landscaping, parking space size may be
reduced to 9.5 X 18 or 171 square feet.
(b)
The primary landscaping material used in
parking areas shall be trees which provide
shade or are capable of providing shade at
maturity. Each landscaped area shall
include at least one small tree, as out-
lined in this Section. The total number of
trees shall not be less than one for each
200 square feet, or fraction thereof, of
required interior landscaped area. The
remaining area shall be landscaped with
shrubs and other vegetative material to
complement the tree landscaping.
(c)
Landscaping areas shall be reasonably
dispersed throughout, located so as to
divide and break up the expanse of paving.
The area designated as required setbacks
shall not be calculated as required land-
scaped area.
(2) Peripheral parking area landscaping.
(a)
Peripheral landscaping shall be required
along any side of a parking area that abuts
land not in the right of way of a street
such that:
A landscaped strip at least ten feet in
width shall be located between the parking
area and the abutting property lines,
except where driveways or other openings
may be required. Continuous hedge forms or
at least one small tree, as outlined in
this Section, shall be planted in the
landscaped strip for each fifty lineal
feet. (p)
Signs shall be regulated by the "Route 10 Special Sign
District" requirements for a single office in an Office
Business (O) District for use of the existing structure.
At such time that additional office space is developed,
signs shall comply with the "Route 10 Special Sign Dis-
trict'' requirements for office parks in an Office Business
(O) District. Landscaping shall be provided around the
base of freestanding signs. A landscaping plan depicting
this requirement shall be submitted to the Planning De-
partment for approval. (P)
Public water shall be used. At such time as public sewer
is extended to within 200 feet of the request parcel or
office space in addition to the existing structure is
developed, the owner/developer shall extend sewer to serve
the entire 3.9 acre parcel. (U)
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for
office use of the single family dwelling, right of way, as
indicated on the construction plans for the Route 10
widening, shall be dedicated to and for the County of
87-415
Chesterfield, free and unrestricted. Prior to the issu-
ance of a building permit for any new structures or expan-
sion of the existing structure, 100 feet of right of way,
measured from the centerline of Route 10, shall be ded-
icated to and for the County of Chesterfield, free and
unrestricted. (T)
13.
Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for office
use of the single family residence, a sewer easement shall
be dedicated for the future extension of public sewer
along Reedy Branch. (U)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
87S042
In Midlothian Magisterial District, SUPER 8 MOTEL DEVELOPERS,
INC. requested Conditional Use Planned Development to permit a
motel and bulk exceptions in a Community Business (B-2)
District on a 1.9 acre parcel fronting approximately 228 feet
on the north line of Midlothian Turnpike, approximately 150
feet east of Fairwood Drive. Tax Map 18-15 (1) Parcels 41 and
42 (Sheet 8).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of this request, subject to certain conditions and accept-
ance of the applicant's proffered condition.
Mr. Edward Willey, Jr., the applicant's representative, stated
the recommended conditions were acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S042, subject to the following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by T.S.P. Group, Inc., and submitted with the appli-
cation shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
Public water and sewer shall be used. Prior to any site
plan submission, a hydraulic analysis of the existing
sewer line shall be submitted to the Utilities Department
for approval. Prior to release of any building permit,
adequate sewer capacity, as required by the Utilities
Department, shall be provided. (U)
Ail exterior lights shall be arranged and installed so
that the direct or reflected illumination does not exceed
0.5 foot candles above background measured at the lot line
of the adjoining Residential (R-15) properties to the
north or public rights of way. Lighting standards shall
be of a directional-type capable of shielding light source
from direct view. A lighting plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Department in conjunction with final site
plan review. (P)
The building shall have an architectural style as depicted
in the photographs submitted with the application. The
first and second story walls shall be veneered with brick
and the third story walls shall be stucco with wood trim.
The architectural treatment of the building shall be such
that no building facade (whether front, side, or rear)
consists of architectural materials inferior in quality,
appearance, or detail to any other facade of the building.
No portion of the building constructed of unadorned cinder
block or corrugated and/or sheet metal shall be visible
from any adjoining property or public right of way.
Mechanical equipment, whether ground-level or rooftop,
shall be shielded and screened from public view and de-
signed to be perceived as an integral part of the build-
87-416
ing. Air conditioning units shall be flush mounted,
covered with gratings similar in appearance to those
depicted in the photographs submitted with the applica-
tion, and painted or otherwise treated to blend with the
materials used in construction of the walls. Detailed
renderings depicting these requirements shall be submitted
to the Planning Department for approval in conjunction
with site plan review. (P)
In conjunction with the approval of this request, a five
(5) foot exception to the twenty-five (25) foot parking
setback requirement along Route 60 shall be granted. The
existing elevation of the parking area shall be maintained
so as to create a "berm like" effect between Route 60 and
the parking area. Within the twenty (20) foot setback,
landscaping shall be installed. A detailed landscaping
plan depicting this requirement shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval in conjunction with site
plan review. (P)
Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the
perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. (EE)
No tractor trailer parking shall be permitted on the
premises. (CPC)
The developer shall notify the President of the Bon Air
Civic Association of the time and date of schematic plan
review. (CPC)
And further, the Board accepted the following proffered condi-
tion:
A buffer shall be maintained adjacent to Residential
(R-15) zoned lots to the north and west. Existing ever-
green trees within the buffer shall be supplemented with
landscaping so as to minimize the view of the property
from the Residential (R-15) lots to the north and west. A
detailed landscaping plan depicting this requirement shall
be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval in
conjunction with schematic plan review.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
87S043
In Matoaca Magisterial District, COLONIAL HEIGHTS ASSEMBLY OF
GOD requested a Conditional Use to permit a private school in
an Agricultural (A) District on a 5.0 acre parcel lying ap-
proximately 330 feet off the northeast line of Harrowgate Road,
across from Pineland Avenue. Tax Map 1163-6 (1) Part of Parcel
14 (Sheet 49).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of this request, subject to certain conditions.
Mr. Larry Briggs, Pastor of Colonial Heights Assembly of God
Church, stated the recommended conditions were acceptable.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approv-
ed Case 87S043, subject to the following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan submit-
ted with the application shall be considered the plan of
development. (P)
Uses permitted shall be limited to a private school and
customary and incidental accessory uses. (P)
87-417
Athletic fields shall be located to the south of proposed
buildings, away from existing and future adjacent residen-
tial development to the north (Tax Map 163-6 (1) Parcels
13 and 38). Athletic fields shall not be lighted. (P)
A thirty (30) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
northwestern property line adjacent to Agricultural (A)
zoning. With the exception of utilities, which run
generally perpendicular through the buffer, a fence along
the southern boundary of this buffer and the proposed
parking area, there shall be no other facilities or other
improvements within this buffer. Existing vegetation
within this buffer shall be maintained and shall be sup-
plemented with additional vegetation and/or a fence where
necessary to provide effective screening. The proposed
parking area shall be screened from view of the adjacent
Agricultural (A) property. A detailed plan depicting
these requirements shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval in conjunction with site plan
review· (P)
5. Public water and sewer shall be used. (U)
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, sixty (60)
feet of right of way, measured from the centerline of the
existing right of way of Harrowgate Road, shall be ded-
icated to and for the County of Chesterfield, free and
unrestricted. (T)
Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, a right turn
lane and a left turn lane shall be constructed along
Harrowgate Road. (T)
(Note: Prior to obtaining a building permit, site plans
must be submitted to the Planning Department for
approval.)
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
87S047
In Matoaca Magisterial District, CONTINENTAL LAND SALES, INC.
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15)
of 88.9 acres plus amendment to a previously granted zoning
(Case 86S047) relative to minimum lot size and a number of on a
79 acre tract currently zoned Residential (R-15). This request
lies on a total of 167.9 acres fronting on the east line of
Bundle Road in two (2) places for a total of approximately
1,400 feet, beginning at the point approximately 1,800 feet
south of Woodpecker Road. Tax Map 128 (1) Parcel 11 and Part
of Parcel 10 (Sheet 39).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of this request and acceptance of the proffered condition.
Mr. Steve Armendinger, the applicant's representative, stated
the recommendation was acceptable. He commented that the
portion of the Request Analysis for Utilities states that the
nearest water line is approximately two (2) miles east of the
proposed site and he would like the record to reflect that the
distance is actually over three (3) miles away as they have
measured it.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Dodd inquired if the applicant planned to utilize wells on
the proposed site. Mr. Armendinger stated they did. Mr. Dodd
stated the Utilities portion of the Request Analysis also
pointed out that, based on existing and anticipated area
development, they feel that public water should be extended
87-418
along Beach Road to serve this development. Mr. Jacobson
stated there is no condition, at this time, that requires the
use of public water; however, the Utilities Department will
consider this at the time of subdivision review and will work
with the applicant at that time to determine the best way to
provide both water and sewer services to this site.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approv-
ed rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-15) and
accepted the following proffered condition:
Minimum lot size of 35,000 square feet.
And further, the Board approved an amendment to previously
accepted proffered conditions on an adjacent parcel of land.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
87S056
In Midlothian Magisterial District, BRANDERMILL WOODS, LTD.
requested rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Office Business (O)
with Conditional Use Planned Development on an 18.4 acre parcel
fronting approximately 844 feet on the north line of Old
Hundred Road, across from Brandermill Parkway. Tax Map 36-11
(1) Part of Parcel 3 (Sheet 13).
Mr. Jacobson stated the Planning Commission recommended approv-
al of this request, subject to certain conditions and accept-
ance of the applicant's proffered conditions. He further
stated staff had distributed an addendum which changed proffer-
ed condition 1.
Mr. Daniel stated that Mr. Applegate had requested he read into
the record the following statement: "Due to my absence from
the Board Meeting of May 27, 1987, please let the record show
that had I been present I would have disclosed a potential
conflict of interest on Case 87S056, Brandermill Woods, Ltd.,
since my company is involved in the sale of the property."
Mr. Phil Rome, the applicant's representative, stated the
recommended conditions, including the addendum, were accept-
able.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved Case 87S056, subject to the following conditions:
The following conditions notwithstanding, the plan pre-
pared by Danielson and Paine, dated April 24, 1987, as
modified by the plat prepared by J.K. Timmons & Associ-
ates, P.C., dated April 20, 1987, and the revised Textual
Statement shall be considered the Master Plan. (P)
Public water and sewer shall be used. In conjunction with
schematic plan review, a hydraulic analysis of the exist-
ing eight (8) inch sewer line shall be submitted to the
Utilities Department for approval. Prior to release of
any building permit, adequate sewer capacity, as required
by the Utilities Department, shall be provided. (U)
(Note: If adequate capacity is not available in the
existing eight (8) inch sewer line, the twenty-four (24)
inch Little Tomahawk trunk line must be extended.)
The developer shall provide an accurate account of the
drainage situation showing existing drainage and the
impact this development will have on the site and sur-
rounding area. The developer shall submit an overall
storm water management and site construction plan to
87-419
Environmental Engineering and VDOT providing for on- and
off-site drainage facilities in accordance with the En-
vironmental Engineering section of the "Request Analysis
and Recommendation." These plans shall be approved by
Environmental Engineering and VDOT, and all necessary
easements shall be obtained prior to any vegetative dis-
turbance. The approved off-site plan may have to be
implemented prior to clearing. (EE)
The existing corrugated metal pipe under Old Hundred Road
shall be replaced by a culvert approved by Environmental
Engineering and VDOT. (EE)
A paved ditch or pipe storm water conveyance system shall
be provided from the invert-out of the improved culvert
under Old Hundred Road to the existing storm sewer in
Brandermill Woods, Phase I. (EE)
Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the
perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. Drainage
shall be designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian
access. (EE)
Buffer and Setback Requirements.
(a)
Ail structures shall be located a minimum of 100 feet
from the ultimate right of way of Old Hundred Road.
All parking and driveway areas shall be located a
minimum of fifty (50) feet from the ultimate right of
way of Old Hundred Road. These areas shall be main-
tained as a natural buffer which shall be supplement-
ed with additional vegetation, where necessary, to
effect proper screening.
(b)
A fifty (50) foot building and parking setback shall
be maintained as a buffer along the eastern property
line, as measured from the ultimate right of way of
the proposed north/south public road. Other than
landscape elements, access, utilities, and signs as
permitted through site plan review, there shall be no
other facilities permitted in the buffer.
(c)
A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along
the western property line for buildings. A twenty-
five (25) foot buffer shall be maintained along the
western property line for parking. With the excep-
tion of utilities, which run generally perpendicular
through the buffer, pedestrian walkways, jogging
trails, landscaping, and a fence as permitted through
site plan review, there shall be no other facilities
permitted within this buffer. This buffer may be
modified by the Planning Commission through schematic
plan review if adjacent property is developed for a
non-residential use.
(d)
With the exception of the setbacks specified herein,
there shall be no interior lot line setbacks.
Existing vegetation within these setbacks and buffers
shall be supplemented with landscaping to minimize
the view of driveways and parking areas and enhance
the appearance of buildings and grounds. Prior to
rough clearing and grading, a conceptual landscaping
plan depicting these requirements shall be submitted
to the Planning Commission for approval. A detailed
landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval in conjunction with final
site plan review. (P)
Prior to erection of any signs, a conceptual sign package
shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for ap-
proval. Upon submission of a comprehensive sign package,
the Planning Commission may modify the requirements of the
87-420
Zoning Ordinance (i.e., may be either more or less re-
strictive) to the extent that the spirit and intent of the
Ordinance and concept of the development are met and that
proliferation is not encouraged. (P)
The proposed building(s) shall have an architectural style
and utilize materials as depicted in the renderings and
described in the Textual Statement submitted with the
application. Architectural treatment of building facades
(whether front, side, or rear) shall not consist of archi-
tectural materials of inferior quality, appearance, or
detail to any other facade of the same building. The
intent of this requirement is not to preclude the use of
different materials on different building facades (which
would be acceptable if representative of good architec-
tural design) but rather, to preclude the use of inferior
materials on sides which face adjoining property and thus,
might adversely impact existing or future development.
Mechanical equipment, whether ground-level or rooftop,
shall be shielded and screened from public view and de-
signed to be perceived as an integral part of the build-
ing. Special treatment shall be provided for any rooftops
on buildings if such rooftops are visible from Powhite
Parkway. Such special treatment will attempt to ensure
that any heating, ventilating, and air conditioning equip-
ment located on such rooftops will be screened and/or
incorporated into the building design. Elevations depict-
ing these requirements shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for approval in conjunction with site plan
review. (P)
10. Ail site lighting, including parking lot and roadway
standards, sign lighting, walkway lighting and "accent"
lighting shall be of such a design and/or location so that
the light source is substantially shielded from view and
light "glare" is minimal. Lighting within any site that
unnecessarily illuminates or substantially interferes with
the use and enjoyment of any other site, particularly
those residential districts which neighbor this develop-
ment, shall be prohibited. (P)
11. Ail utility lines such as electric, telephone, CATV, or
other similar lines shall be installed underground. All
junction and access boxes shall be screened with appropri-
ate landscaping. All utility pad fixtures and meters
shall be shown on the site plan. The necessity for utili-
ty connections, meter boxes, etc., shall be recognized and
integrated with the architectural elements of the site
plan. (P)
12.
Sites shall be designed and buildings shall be oriented so
that loading areas are not visible from adjacent residen-
tial properties or from public rights of way. (P)
13.
Surface parking areas shall be landscaped so as to divide
and break up the expanse of pavement. Parking areas shall
have at least ten (10) square feet of interior landscaping
for each space. Each landscaped area shall contain a
minimum 100 square feet and shall have a minimum dimension
of at least ten (10) feet. The total number of trees
shall not be less than one (1) for each 200 square feet,
or fraction thereof, of required interior landscaped area.
The remaining area shall be landscaped with shrubs, ground
cover or other authorized landscaping material. Land-
scaped areas shall be located so as to divide and break up
the expanse of paving. The area designated as required
setbacks shall not be calculated as required landscaped
area. Conceptual plans depicting this requirement shall
be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval in
conjunction with schematic plan review. Detailed plans
shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval
in conjunction with site plan review. (P)
87-421
14.
The amount of open space remaining in any developed site
(computed on an aggregate basis for all property within
the nursing home and medical office tracts) shall not be
less than 50% of gross site area. Open space shall be
that portion of the site not covered by a building (or
buildings) or by parking, driveways, or roadways. (P)
15.
Prior to, or in conjunction with, the first schematic/sub-
division approval, a conceptual pedestrian walkway plan
for the entire development shall be submitted to the
Planning Commission for approval. This plan shall facili-
tate pedestrian movements throughout the development and
the area surrounding the site. The plan shall be imple-
mented in conjunction with development. Detailed plans
for construction of each phase of the system shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for approval in
conjunction with site plan review. (P)
And further, the Board accepted the following proffered condi-
tions:
The developer shall dedicate to Chesterfield County free
and unrestricted, at such time as the County shall re-
quire, but prior to the issuance of any building permits,
that certain parcel of land for use as a public right-
of-way containing 2.150 acres described as Parcel 3 on a
plat by J.K. Timmons & Associates, Inc., dated March 31,
1987, revised most recently May 18, 1987 entitled "Plat
Showing 5 Parcels of Land Lying North of Old Hundred Road"
in Midlothian District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, a
copy of which plat is attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
Other than temporary construction access approved by the
Transportation Department, there shall be no access to Old
Hundred Road/Powhite Parkway Extension.
The developer shall dedicate or cause to have dedicated to
Chesterfield County at such time as the County shall
require, but prior to the issuance of any building permit,
90 feet of right of way free and unrestricted for the
north/south road between the Old Hundred Road/Powhite
Parkway Extension and the north property line.
Construction plans for a 4 lane divided north/south road
shall be submitted to and approved by the Transportation
Department prior to the issuance of any building permits.
These plans shall show the horizontal and vertical align-
ment of the ultimate grade separation of the "north/south
road" at the Powhite Parkway Extension, but not con-
struction detail for the crossing. Access to the north/-
south road shall be approved by the Transportation Depart-
ment. The developer shall construct 2 lanes of the 4 lane
roadway. A phasing plan for the construction of the 2
lanes may be submitted to the Transportation Department
for approval.
The medical office complex to be constructed on the north-
ern portion of the subject parcel shall not exceed 70,000
square feet of gross leasable area. The capacity of the
nursing home to be constructed on the southern portion of
the site shall be limited to 120 beds, and the capacity of
the assisted living facilities to be constructed adjacent
to the nursing home shall be limited to sixty (60) beds.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
87-422
12. ADJOU~
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board ad-
journed at 3:30 p.m. (EDST) until 1:00 p.m. (EDST) on June 3,
1987, in the Administration Building Conference Room (Room
502) .
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
Acting County Admi~4istrator
87-423