Loading...
08-12-1987 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES August 12, 1987 Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman Mr. Jesse J. Mayes, Vice Chairman Mr. G. H. Applegate Mr. R. Garland Dodd Mrs. Joan Girone Mr. Lane B. Ramsey Acting County Administrator Staff in Attendance: Mrs. Doris DeHart, Legislative Coord. Ms. Joan Dolezal, Clerk to the Board Chief Robert Eanes, Fire Department Mr. Bradford S. Hammer, Asst. Co. Admin. Mr. William Howell, Dir., Gen. Services Mr. Thomas Jacobson, Dir. of Planning Mr. Robert Masden, Asst. Co. Admin. for Human Services Mr. R. J. McCracken, Transp. Director Mr. Richard McElfish, Dir. of Env. Eng. Mr. Steve Micas, Co. Attorney Mrs. Pauline Mitchell, Dir. of News/Info. Services Col. Joseph Pittman, Chief of Police Mr. Richard Sale, Asst. Co. Admin. for Development Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr., Dir. of Parks & Rec. Mr. David Welchons, Dir. of Utilities Mr. Frederick Willis, Dir. of Human Resource Management Mr. Daniel called the meeting to order in the County Adminis- trator's Conference Room of the Administration Building at 9:00 a.m. (EDST). 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board went into Executive Session to discuss personnel matters, pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (a) (1) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Vote: Unanimous Reconvening: 2. LUNCH The Board recessed to travel to the Defense General Supply Center for lunch. Officers' Club at the 87-594 Reconvening: Mr. Daniel called the work session to order in Room 502 of the Administration Building at 2:00 p.m. 3. WORK SESSIONS 3.A. COUNTY HEALTH CARE INSURANCE PROGRAM Mr. Willis presented a summary of information concerning the general background on the County's health care program; the health care plans available; major factors affecting 1987-88 recommendations; recommended rates and actions necessary to commence the employee open enrollment process; a proposal to adopt an Internal Revenue Service Code Section 125 Plan, which will offset the impact of health care rate increases on employ- ees' take home pay (Flexible Compensation); recommended actions for the 1987-88 Plan Year and future actions to be taken in addressing long term health care and benefit issues; current rates versus proposed rates; comparison of bi-weekly net income with and without "Flex Comp"; etc. Discussion and questions ensued relative to the elimination of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Comprehensive Plan and the factors affecting the 1987-88 recommendations; comparison of the benefits of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Comprehensive Plan to those of the KeyCare Plan, a Blue Cross/Blue Shield Preferred Provider Organization (PPO); other health care plans available; employee open enrollment process; proposal to adopt an Internal Revenue Service Code Section 125 Plan to offset the impact of health care rate increases on employees' take home pay; current rates versus proposed rates; comparison of bi-weekly net income without and without "Flex Comp"; future actions to be taken in addressing long term health care and benefit issues; the feasibility of including the development of specifications to put the County's health care program out to bid in the 1988-89 Plan Year; etc. 3.B. CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of information relative to the proposed overlay district; the areas of application; the development process established by Conditional Use Planned Development versus the development process established by the Overlay District; the technical amendments to the ordinance; improved staff response to the development community; quality development standards as provided by the Overlay District requirements; comments from property owners, developers, civic leaders, representatives of the Chesterfield Business Council; etc. Discussion and questions ensued relative to the removal of signs from premises if a business is vacant and the length of time the sign is permitted to remain at the site; screening of cable television pedestals; direction of exterior lighting levels; architectural integrity of buildings; the "10-acre rule" and its applicability; shared access; submittal of access plans; allowances for "reader boards"; adjustment of fees in Overlay District; setbacks from "ultimate" rights of way; existing rights of way; road widening; the technical amendments to the ordinance; application of the Overlay District County- wide; the prohibition of portable signs; uniform sign packages for shopping centers; sign heights; etc. Mr. Ramsey introduced Ms. Karen Russell, recently employed as Risk Manager. The Board welcomed Ms. Russell to the County. 87-595 4. DINNER The Board recessed to travel to the Holiday Inn in Chester for dinner. Reconvening: Mr. Daniel called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 5. INVOCATION Mr. Daniel introduced Deputy Sheriff O. C. Graves, Jr., Ser- geant At Arms, who gave the invocation. 6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America was recited. 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7.A. AMENDMENT TO OCTOBER 22, 1986 MINUTES Mr. Sale stated when preparing the resolution for state road acceptance of roads in Fairpines, Sections 1, 2 and 3, for the Board meeting held October 22, 1986, all three sections were included in one resolution. He stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has requested the resolutions be made with Sections 1 and 2 as one resolution and Section 3 as another resolution to facilitate processing. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board amended the minutes of October 22, 1986, from the following: "This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Fairpines Road, Fairpines Court, South Jessup Road, East Banes Court, West Banes Court, East Denny Court, West Denny Court, Brambleton Road, Berryridge Terrace and Meterie Court in Fairpines, Sections 1, 2 and 3, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, it is resolved that Fairpines Road, Fairpines Court, South Jessup Road, East Banes Court, West Banes Court, East Denny Court, West Denny Court, Brambleton Road, Berryridge Terrace and Meterie Court in Fairpines, Section 1, 2 and 3, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Fairpines Road, beginning at the eastern end of existing Fairpines Road, State Route 2130, and running easterly 0.25 mile to the intersection with South Jessup Road, then continuing easterly 0.05 mile to the inter- section with Fairpines Court, then continuing easterly 0.04 mile to end in a dead end; Fairpines Court, beginning at the intersection with Fairpines Road and running southerly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; South Jessup Road, beginning at the intersection with Fairpines Road and running southerly 0.07 mile to end in a temporary turnaround. Again, South Jessup Road, beginning at the intersection with Fairpines Road and 87-596 running northerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with East and West Banes Court, then continuing northerly 0.05 mile to the intersection with East and West Denny Court, then continuing northerly 0.07 mile to the intersection with Brambleton Road, then continuing northerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Meterie Court, then continuing northerly 0.14 mile to the intersection with Hallmark Drive, State Route 3165; East Banes Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running easterly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; West Banes Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running westerly 0.09 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; East Denny Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running easterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; West Denny Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running westerly 0.19 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Brambleton Road, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running westerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Berryridge Terrace, then continuing westerly 0.01 mile to end in a dead end; Berryridge Terrace, beginning at the intersection with Brambleton Road and running northerly 0.01 mile to end in a dead end; and Meterie Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running northeasterly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, site distance and designated Virginia Department of Highways drainage ease- ments. These roads serve 150 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Highways a 50' right- of-way for all of these roads except Fairpines Court, East and West Banes Court, and East Denny Court which have a 40' right- of-way, and South Jessup Road and a portion of Fairpines Road which have a 60' right-of-way. These sections of Fairpines are recorded as follows: Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Plat Book 42, Pages 81 & 82, April 7, 1983. Plat Book 44, Pages 69 & 70, December 1, 1983. Plat Book 46, Page 8, June 1, 1984. Vote: Unanimous" To the following: "This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Fairpines Road, Fairpines Court, South Jessup Road, East Banes Court, West Banes Court, East Denny Court and West Denny Court in Fairpines, Sections 1 and 2, Dale District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, it is resolved that Fairpines Road, Fairpines Court, South Jessup Road, East Banes Court and West Banes Court, East Denny Court and West Denny Court in Fair- pines, Sections 1 and 2, Dale District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Fairpines Road, beginning where State Main- tenance ends, existing Fairpines Road, State Route 2130, and running easterly 0.23 mile to the intersection with South Jessup Road, then continuing easterly 0.05 mile to the inter- section with Fairpines Court, then continuing easterly 0.04 mile to end in a dead end; Fairpines Court, beginning at the intersection with Fairpines Road and running southerly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; South Jessup Road, beginning at the intersection with Fairpines Road and running southerly 0.07 mile to end in a temporary turnaround. Again South Jessup 87-597 Road, beginning at the intersection with Fairpines Road and running northerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with east Banes Court and West Banes Court, then continuing northerly 0.05 mile to the intersection with East Denny Court and West Denny Court, then continuing northerly 0.03 mile to tie into proposed South Jessup Road, Fairpines, Section 3; East Banes Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running easterly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; West Banes Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running south- westerly 0.09 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; East Denny Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running easterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and West Denny Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running southwesterly 0.19 mile to end in a cul-de- sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 105 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 40' right-of-way for East Denny Court, East Banes Court, West Banes Court and Fairpines Court, a 50' right-of-way for Fairpines Road and West Denny Court and a 60' right-of-way for South Jessup Road. These sections of Fairpines are recorded as follows: Section 1. Plat Book 42, Pages 81 & 82, April 7, 1983. Section 2. Plat Book 44, Pages 69 & 70, December 1, 1983. Deed of Dedication. Plat Book 1450, Page 471, January 8, 1980. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of South Jessup Road, Meterie Court, Brambleton Road and Berryridge Terrace in Fairpines, Section 3 and a portion of Lake Farms, Section A, Dale District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, it is resolved that South Jessup Road, Meterie Court, Brambleton Road and Berryridge Terrace in Fairpines, Section 3 and a portion of Lake Farms, Section A, Dale District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, South Jessup Road, beginning at the inter- section with existing Hallmark Drive, State Route 3165, and running southerly 0.14 mile to the intersection with Meterie Court, then continuing southerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Brambleton Road, then continuing southerly 0.03 mile to tie into proposed South Jessup Road, Fairpines, Section 1; Meterie Court, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running northeasterly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de- sac; Brambleton Road, beginning at the intersection with South Jessup Road and running westerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Berryridge Terrace, then continuing westerly 0.01 mile to end in a dead end; and Berryridge Terrace, beginning at the intersection with Brambleton Road and running northerly 0.01 mile to end in a dead end. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 43 lots. 87-598 And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads except South Jessup Road which has a 60' right-of-way. This section of Fairpines is recorded as follows: Section 3. Plat Book 46, Page 8, June 1, 1984. This portion of Lake Farms is recorded as follows: Section A. Plat Book 32, Pages 41 & 42, October 18, 1978. Vote: Unanimous" Vote: Unanimous 7.B. AMENDMENT TO JUNE 10, 1987 MINUTES Mr. Sale stated resolutions for Utilities Department Right of Way Items 14.E.3.b.l., Condemnation Along Lawing Drive for the heirs of William J. Jones and Item 14.E.3.b.2, Condemnation Along Lawing Drive for the heirs of Abraham White and Joseph L. White, were incorrectly recorded in the June 10, 1987 Board minutes. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board amended the minutes of June 10, 1987, from the following: "14.E.3.b.1. THE HEIRS OF WILLIAMS J. JONES On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board autho- rized the County Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings against the following property owners if the amount as set opposite their names is not accepted. And be it further resolved that the Acting County Administrator notify said property owners by registered mail on June 11, 1987, of the County's intention to enter upon and take the property which is to be the subject of said condemnation proceedings. This action is on an emergency basis and the County intends to exercise immediate right of entry pursuant to Section 15.1- 238.1 of the Code of Virginia. Heirs of William J. Jones W87-1B $114.00 Vote: Unanimous 14.E.3.b.2. THE HEIRS OF ABRAHAM WHITE AND JOSEPH L. WHITE On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board autho- rized the County Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings against the following property owners if the amount as set opposite their names is not accepted. And be it further resolved that the Acting County Administrator notify said property owners by registered mail on June 11, 1987, of the County's intention to enter upon and take the property which is to be the subject of said condemnation proceedings. This action is on an emergency basis and the County intends to exercise immediate right of entry pursuant to Section 15.1- 238.1 of the Code of Virginia. Heirs or Abraham White and Joseph L. White W87-1B $843.00 Vote: Unanimous" To The Following: 87-599 "14.E.3.b.1. THE HEIRS OF WILLIAMS J. JONES On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board autho- rized the County Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings against the heirs of William J. Jones for a water easement along Lawing Drive on an emergency basis. The estimated value of the easement is $114.00. Vote: Unanimous 14.E.3.b.2. THE HEIRS OF ABRAHAM WHITE On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board autho- rized the County Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings against the heirs of Abraham White for a water easement along Lawing Drive on an emergency basis. The estimated value of the easement is $843.00. Vote: Unanimous" Vote: Unanimous 7.C. JULY 22, 1987 MINUTES On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board aPProved the minutes of July 22, 1987, as submitted. Vote: Unanimous 8. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS Mr. Ramsey commended Chief Pittman and the Police Department for their diligence, dedicated efforts, swift action and coordination with the community to solve the recent abduction case involving JoAnna Chinnis. Mr. Karl Schlenker, Vice President of the Salem Woods Subdivi- sion Homeowners Association, expressed sincere appreciation to Chief Pittman, the Police Department and all those involved in the rescue of JoAnna Chinnis. He commended the Chesterfield Police Department for its exemplary police work and stated the residents owe a tremendous debt to the Police Department, Fire Department, area Rescue Squads and those persons from Maryland involved in this endeavor. The Board also commended these efforts and stated the comments made were representative of all the telephone calls received from residents in the area, both at work and those living there. 9. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS It was generally agreed the Board would forego its Committee Reports. 10. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE AC~ION~ EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION On motion of the Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board renumbered Item 11., Resolution Recognizing The Honorable Ernest P. Gates Upon His Retirement, to Item ll.A.; added Item ll.B., Resolution Honoring the Huguenot Little League All- Stars; deferred indefinitely Item 15.D.l.a., Set Public Hearing Date to Consider Conveyance of a Parcel of Land in the Airport Industrial Park to the STI National Institute of Technology, Norway; deferred Item 13.D., Appropriation of Funds for Cares, Inc., until legal concerns have been resolved. 87-600 It was noted additional information was distributed to the Board on Items 14., Ordinance to Amend the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as Amended, Relating to Special Corridor Overlay District and 15.H.8., Route 288 Bid Approval; and adopted the agenda, as amended. Vote: Unanimous 11. RESOL~IONS OR SPECIAL RECOGNITION ll.A. THE HONORABLE ERNEST P. GATES, UPON RETIREMENT On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Ernest P. Gates served the County of Chesterfield as Commonwealth's Attorney for twelve years; and WHEREAS, Ernest P. Gates served the Judicial System of Chesterfield County when he was appointed Judge of Chesterfield County and Colonial Heights Circuit Courts in July, 1966; and WHEREAS, Ernest P. Gates served on the Council of the Virginia State Bar and its Executive Committee; is a Member of the Virginia and American Bar Associations; is Vice Chairman of the Criminal Justice Services Board of the Commonwealth of Virginia, serving as the Representative of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia; and is Chairman of the Sentenc- ing Guidelines Committee of the Judicial Conference of Vir- ginia; and WHEREAS, Ernest P. Gates was also actively involved in community and civic endeavors as a member of the First Board of Visitors of Longwood College and was Vice Rector of the Board; was a Member of the Board of Trustees of Hampden-Sydney College; is a past President of the Chesterfield Historical Society of Virginia; is a member of the Chesterfield Bicenten- nial Constitutional Committee and is Vice Chairman of the Henricus Foundation; and WHEREAS, Ernest P. Gates will retire from the Bench as Circuit Court Judge for Chesterfield-Colonial Heights on September 1, 1987. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby recognizes and extends on behalf of its members and the citizens of Chesterfield County, appreciation for the dedicated and loyal service of Ernest P. Gates for over thirty-three years which experience will be sorely missed. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a plaque inscribed as follows be presented to Ernest P. Gates: IN APPRECIATION FOR THIRTY-THREE YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY WHILE SERVING AS COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY AND JUDGE OF CIRCUIT COURT Vote: Unanimous Mr. Daniel stated the resolution and a plaque will be presented to Judge Gates at a future reception/dinner in his honor. ll.B. HUGUENOT LITTLE LEAGUE ALL STARS On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, The Huguenot Little League was formally chartered in 1971; and WHEREAS, The Huguenot Little League has grown so that it includes more than 1,000 youngsters who play baseball at Robious Athletic Complex; and 87-601 WHEREAS, The Huguenot Little League is in District 5 of the State Little League and its teams compete against teams from the Districts of Bristol, Tidewater, Salem, Danville and Bridgewater, Virginia and the District of Columbia; and WHEREAS, The Huguenot American Major All-Stars Team is made up of the top eleven and twelve year old players from the American Division of The Huguenot Little League; and WHEREAS, The eleven and twelve year old team of The Huguenot American Major All-Stars defeated teams rich in baseball tradition to win the 1987 State Championship, beating the team from Lebanon, Virginia, 8-6 in the finals at the Salem Civic Center; and WHEREAS, The Huguenot American Major All-Stars will travel to St. Petersburg, Florida to compete in the Southern Region Little League Tournament, thus representing their League, County and State. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its congratula- tions to the members of the team: Grant Beavers, Michael Blakey, Justin Bonser, Jay Diamond, Tim Dunham, Keith Eberley, Joel Franks, John Galloway, Peter Gambardella, Chris Goodman, Kevin Hetzel, Chad Hresan, David Moore and Lee Watson; Mr. Tom Turner, Manager; Mr. Jim Dodson, Coach and Mr. Ron Franks, League Representative of The Huguenot American Major All-Stars on the occasion of winning the State Championship. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors wishes The Huguenot American Major All-Stars every success in its quest for victory in St. Petersburg, Florida. Vote: Unanimous Mrs. Girone recognized the individual team members, the manager, the coach and the league representative of the Huguenot American Major All-Stars, as well as the families of team members who were present. The Board congratulated them for their achievement in winning the State Championship and wished them success in the quest for victory in the Southern Region Little League Tournament competition in St. Petersburg, Florida. 12. BEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCWE. DULED MATTERS OR CLAIMS There were no hearings of citizens on unscheduled matters or claims. 13. DEFERRED ITEMS 13.A. APPOINTMENTS - METROPOLITAN RICHMOND CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board appointed the following people to serve on the Board of Direc- tors of the Metropolitan Richmond Convention and Visitors Bureau, whose terms are effective immediately and will expire as indicated: Mrs. Marie Beach Mr. Robert Brittle June 30, 1989 June 30, 1988 Vote: Unanimous 13.B. NOMINATION OF THREE PRSPERTIES FOR COUNTY LANDMARK DESIGNATION On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board nominated Hallsborough Tavern and Traebue's Tavern, listed on 87-602 the National Register within the Midlothian Magisterial Dis- trict, for consideration to be designated as County Historic Landmarks. Vote: Unanimous It is noted the owners of Bellona Arsenal, the third property for consideration, have verbally indicated that they are not interested in County landmark designation and; therefore, are not to be considered. 13.C. FIVE FORKS TRAFFIC CONTROL Mr. Ramsey stated Board approval for an appropriation, in the amount of $30,000 from the General Fund Contingency Account to the Police Department FY87-88 budget, to continue the Five Forks intersection traffic control with off-duty police offi- cers was deferred from the July 22, 1987 meeting. He stated staff continues to recommend that the traffic control be terminated because the Police Department budget does not include funding to continue the traffic control, the officers currently direct traffic for only about one hour of the two hours on each shift, there have been many complaints from businesses and citizens about the congestion created on Court- house Road, and there are other equally serious intersections in the County for which the County is not providing this service. Mr. Mayes stated he felt the service is a safety matter and should be continued to protect those people who have to enter or cross Courthouse Road under the existing adverse conditions. Discussion ensued relative to whether or not there has been favorable citizen input for continuing the service, if the shopping center construction at the intersection is generating additional problems, whether or not the shopping center should bear the burden of traffic control at the intersection, insuf- ficient funding in the Police Department budget to continue the service, the impact of increased traffic due to the opening of schools, reducing the hours of coverage, the feasibility of discontinuing the service and monitoring the situation for several weeks, etc. Mr. Mayes stated he felt the Board has a responsibility to ensure that area residents and/or other citizens traveling through this intersection should not have to endure long periods of waiting or endanger their well-being to either access or exit this intersection. He stated he would be willing to compromise to provide the service for one hour in the morning and one hour in the afternoon with only half of the allocation requested. Col. Pittman stated it would be difficult to obtain adequate off duty staff to provide coverage for only one hour in the morning and one hour in the evening. Mr. Applegate inquired if it would be feasible to discontinue the traffic control and monitor the situation until the meeting on August 26, 1987. Mr. Mayes stated he did not wish to discontinue the traffic control at all because he felt the service was essential to the safety of those persons traveling through this intersection. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and appropriated $30,000 from the General Fund Contin- gency Account to the FY87-88 Police Department Budget to continue the Five Forks Traffic Control with off-duty police officers. Mr. Daniel stated he could not support the motion as submitted and requested to defer the issue for thirty days without funding or traffic control so the situation could be monitored for additional data. 87-603 Mr. Mayes stated he would consider deferring the issue provided the protection were continued until the matter is resolved. Mr. Daniel stated it would not be possible to obtain any data if police officers were at the site. Mr. Mayes stated he would not take the responsibility for no protection at this inter- section and requested a vote on the motion to approve the request. Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone. Nay: Mr. Applegate. Abstention: Mr. Daniel. 14. PUBLIC ~.ARINGS o ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICTS Mr. Jacobson presented a summary of information and slides relative to the proposed overlay district; the areas of appli- cation; the development process established by Conditional Use Planned Development versus the development process established by the Overlay District; the technical amendments to the ordinance; improved staff response to the development commun- ity; quality development standards as provided by the Overlay District requirements; comments from property owners, deve- lopers, civic leaders, representatives of the Chesterfield Business Council; etc. Mr. Elbert Howard presented a letter to the Board from Mr. H. Vernon Wynn, a past Planning Commissioner, supporting the proposed ordinance amendment relating to the Corridor Overlay District as recommended by the Planning Commission. Mr. Howard also voiced his support for adoption of the Corrdior Overlay District standards. He commended staff for their diligent efforts and stated their cooperation, expertise and yeoman service resulted in the development of a finished document of which all could be proud. He stated adoption of these stand- ards will substantially re-enforce the ordinance, providing a mechanism by which development can be more positively controll- ed. He recommended if the Board were to vote favorably for adoption of the Corridor Overlay standards that, after a few months of application, consideration be given to bringing the matter back for additional review and modification. Mr. Wilton Ford, President of the Surrywood Civic Association, presented the Board with an 800-signature petition supporting adoption of the proposed arterial corridor overlay district as recommended by the Planning Commission with no changes. When asked, approximately 100 residents stood indicating support for approval of the ordinance. He stated residents of Surrywood, Forest Dale, Pocoshock and surrounding communities feel there should be better development controls within the County that would effectively address issues such as setbacks; multiple curb cuts; landscaping; hazardously located permanent and portable, unsightly billboards/signs; etc., which have resulted in traffic congestion, poor utilization of property fronting major arterials, incompatibility between existing and adjacent land uses and the negative impact upon the adjacent residential neighborhoods. He urged the Board to act positively on approv- al of the proposed arterial corridor overlay district as recommended by the Planning Commission with no changes. Mr. Bob Mooney, President of the Bexley Association, strongly endorsed the adoption of the Overlay District without amend- ment. He stated area residents are very concerned that overall area development be of a quality that is compatible with the quality of existing surrounding residential neighborhoods and that such development enhance and preserve property values and raise the overall value of Chesterfield County. 87-604 Mr. Marshal Driskill stated he felt this action is a progres- sive move and has been needed for a long time. He submitted a petition to the Board from residents of the Dale District supporting adoption of the proposed arterial corridor overlay district and urged the Board to act favorably on its adoption. Ms. Martha Butler presented the Board with a letter from the Brandermill Community Association Board of Directors in support of the proposed arterial corridor overlay district. She stated they feel the document is a well-thought-out amendment which will permit a high standard of development without inhibiting commercial progress and they endorse the concept of goals and major requirements as consistent with balanced planning and the superior quality of life expected in Chesterfield County. Ms. Patricia Lohr, representing Fuqua Farms Civic Association, voiced support for adoption of the Corridor Overlay District as recommended by the Planning Commission and that it be enforced. Mr. John Morgan, Vice President of the Woodlake Community Association, stated the community strongly supports the adop- tion of the proposed arterial corridor overlay district stan- dards with no changes, as they feel it is well conceived and a major step in promoting sensible development along arterial corridors. Mr. Karl Schlenker, Vice President of the Salem Woods Home- owners Association, presented the Board with a petition con- taining in excess of 100 signatures supporting adoption of the proposed ordinance amendment. He stated area residents are concerned with growth, safety, better planning for development, the long range needs of the County, the overall quality of life within the County, etc. He added that the quality of life in the County also encompasses the high quality of police protec- tion to Chesterfield citizens. He noted that the County's Police Department is a leader in innovation and it provides a high level of service to a much larger geographic area than Police in other localities that are better staffed and funded. He suggested that budget priorities be re-examined and addi- tional funding provided to Chesterfield's Police Department. Mr. H. Carter Myers, III, representing the Chesterfield Busi- ness Council, commended staff for their efforts and cooperation in the development of the Overlay District standards and stated the Business Council has endorsed the overall concept of the Overlay District. He stated, as an independent businessman, he wished to address concerns relative to several aspects of the proposed ordinance and requested consideration be given to the inclusion of amendments relative to (1) control of the total aggregate signage permitted; (2) language with respect to the coordinated development of one or more parcels with an aggre- gate size of ten acres or more; and (3) sign heights. Ms. Sandra Lovern, representing residents of Gravelbrook Farms Subdivision, voiced support for adoption of the proposed corridor overlay district standards. Ms. Dorothy Armstrong voiced support of the proposed ordinance and suggested that consideration be given to the extension of its principals and criteria to all corridors within the County in the future that might need it. She expressed concerns relative to landscaping requirements, access, internal circu- lation patterns, etc. She stated the difference between the development and exploitation of land must be determined and considered in the future development of the County. Mr. Dana Dame, representing the development community, voiced support for the adoption of the proposed ordinance, as it will benefit the community at-large, create a favorable environment for business, protect property values and create a parity in marketing aspect of commercial real estate that is not current- ly in place. He urged that if the proposed ordinance were adopted the Board give consideration after a sufficient test 87-605 period has elapsed to expanding the applicability of the standards to other areas of the County. Mr. Will Rogers, a resident of Salem Woods Subdivision, expres- sed concerns relative to unbridled growth in the County and stated he felt something should be done to discourage develop- ment. Mr. David Sauer stated he felt the proposed regulations for the Route 10 Corridor should be extended to the Appomattox River. He stated he felt adoption of these standards would be a step in the right direction and commended those involved with the development of the ordinance. Mr. Steve Perkins, President of the Enon Civic Association, voiced support for the proposed ordinance and stated adoption of these standards will be step in the right direction for improved development in the County. He stated he felt the proposed ordinance is a phenomenal document and voiced support for it in the Enon area as amended to Hopewell. There being no one else present to address the matter, Mr. Daniel closed the public hearing. Mr. Dodd stated he felt the sign district was fine as original- ly proposed but if such standards were going to be applied they should be done all at one time for all the major arterial roads. He stated the way the sign district evolved was a stepping stone to this point. He expressed concerns relative to the possibility of small businesses being adversely impacted by portions of the proposed ordinance and that there should be some amendments. He stated he felt strongly that there should be assurances that the ordinance is administered fairly parti- cularly with respect to the 10 acre parcel and joint access requirements. He stated administration of the ordinance is the key to its success. Mr. Mayes stated he felt the proposal is a step in the right direction toward ensuring the quality of life in the County and voiced support for the document as proposed. Mrs. Girone stated the overlay district requirements have been in use for over two years on Route 60 from Courthouse Road to Powhatan County, relative to limiting curb cuts, reducing signage, etc. She stated she supports the proposal and would like to see it extended out Route 360 from Otterdale west within in the Midlothian District on the north side. She stated she was pleased to see such citizen interest and parti- cipation in this matter. She expressed concern that these standards be applied to other arterials and there not be piece-meal application, and she indicated discussion is needed regarding signage, limiting billboards, etc. Mr. Applegate stated he has been involved in many discussions regarding this matter and felt this ordinance addresses major concerns such as access, traffic congestion, crossovers, etc. He stated he has maintained the position for some time that Route 360 should be developed in a quality manner and this ordinance provides the opportunity to develop Route 360 in a manner that would enhance the County and not be compared to Route 60. He stated there are several aspects of the proposed ordinance that need further discussion; however, with some refinements, he felt the proposed Overlay District serves its intended purpose and he planned to support it. Mr. Daniel expressed appreciation for the interest and parti- cipation of those present. He noted that by his talley the petitions submitted to the Board tonight contained over 1,100 signatures in support of this Ordinance. He stated he felt adoption of the proposal is a first step toward progress and quality development for the overall County. He stated quality development and the perception of quality over the County is needed in terms of long range goals to ensure that the tax base 87-606 is maximized through good quality business development, for without this type of development the County would not be able to support strong residential development. In response to a citizen request, Mr. Jacobson briefly outlined the recommended technical amendments to the proposed ordinance. Mr. Daniel moved, seconded by Mr. Mayes, that the Board adopt the proposed Corridor Overlay District Ordinance, with techni- cal amendments as recommended by staff. There was no vote at this time. Mr. Dodd made a motion to amend the original motion, to include approval of the recommended ordinance, the technical amend- ments, as well as the following modifications: (1) Ail uses shall be subject to the use limitations set forth in the underlying zoning district(s), and, in addition, uses that have drive-in windows and/or gasoline pumps, all uses exclusively permitted in the General Business (B-3) District shall only be permitted when incorporated into a coordinated development of one or more parcels with an aggregate size of ten acres or more; (2) Spacing between outdoor advertising signs shall be at least 700 feet along the same side of the same major arterial road. Additionally, along the same side of the same major arterial road, outdoor advertising signs shall be at least 500 feet from County parks, entrances to residential developments and residentially zoned proper- ties. Mr. Daniel expressed concern that Mr. Dodd's amended motion addressed subject matters that were not discussed during the work session or the public hearing. Mr. Jacobson briefly outlined details of a letter from the sign industry relative to amending restrictions for outdoor advertising signs (bill- boards). Mr. Dodd stated the second amendment would be basically Mr. Willey's letter with the exception of changing 300 feet to 500 feet for the distance of signs to be located from County parks, entrances to residential developments and residentially zoned property. Mrs. Girone inquired if the motion included limitations that all outdoor advertising signs shall be on a monopole and shall be no higher than 25 feet above road grade and (2) setbacks shall be the same as setbacks required herein for buildings (75 feet), (3) shall be 700 feet spacing along the same side of the major arterial road and 500 feet from County parks, entrances to residential developments and residentially zoned properties. Mr. Dodd agreed. Mr. Daniel inquired if Mr. Dodd would consider modifying the wording of his motion to include, "except prohibited on Route 10 from the Richmond City limits to the Courthouse unless otherwise approved through the Conditional Use Process for B-3, M-2 and M-3 districts". Mr. Dodd agreed. Mr. Micas stated the issue before the Board is a new zoning opportunity and if adopted, can be applied to those areas as advertised for public hearing and any subsequent areas in the future; however, they could not make the kind of specific zoning decisions being discussed when adopting an ordinance of general applicability. He stated if the Board desired this they would have to establish Overlay Districts "A" and "B" and then apply whatever portions of the designated districts to either option. 87-607 Mr. Dodd amended his motion to include two overlay district options appertaining to billboards: Option A - adding the modifications recommended by the sign industry but changing 300 feet to 500 feet for the distance of such signs from County parks, entrances to residential developments and residentially zoned properties; and Option B - whereby billboards are prohib- ited along Route 10 from the Richmond City line to the Court- house, with the exception of B-3, M-2 and M-3 uses unless otherwise approved by the Conditional Use Planned Development process. Mr. Dodd stated his overall intent was that the districts be expanded to include the entire County. Mr. Daniel stated he agreed but from the input he had received he was very concerned about the area he addressed on Route 10 and he was attempting to ensure that if a motion passed that it included prohibition of billboards in this area. Mr. Dodd restated his motion for adoption of the proposed ordinance with technical amendments, with his modifications and the inclusion of Option B for the prohibition of billboards along Route 10, as requested by Mr. Daniel. There was no second to this motion. Mr. Applegate stated he agreed that Route 360 is different perhaps than Route 10 but is no different than Turner Road, Elkhart Road, Providence Road, Courthouse Road, Coalfield Road, Otterdale Road and others in the County and if the Board is not in complete agreement on implementing the ordinance, then perhaps it should be deferred for two weeks; otherwise, there will be a problem with enforcement. He stated the decision rendered on this issue could have an adverse impact on the small business industry, but with proper controls there is a mechanism for monitoring them. He stated he felt making an arbitrary decision to allow restrictions in one area one way and in another area another way is wrong. Mr. Daniel stated he would hope billboards would not be allowed anywhere, but often one has to compromise to get a first foot forward. He argued very strongly that his constituents wanted the Route 10 corridor left in tact or have the legal mechanism to leave it in tact as proposed in the overlay ordinance. Mr. Applegate seconded Mr. Dodd's motion to allow discussion. Mrs. Girone stated two weeks ago there was discussion on the issue of itinerant merchants and the planning that goes along with that problem and asked how it relates to the overlay. Mr. Jacobson stated staff is having is having its second meeting on that issue tomorrow; it is not ready to be presented to the Board at this time but staff will do so as soon as a recommendation is ready. He stated if any amendments are recommended, they will be part of the overall zoning require- ments because it should apply County-wide. He stated the purpose of bringing the Overlay District to the Board consid- eration is its application to certain developing corridors. He added that an entirely different approach must be taken to address problems associated with existing development along Jefferson Davis Highway and the eastern portion of Midlothian. Mr. Applegate inquired how the proposal before the Board was advertised. Mr. Jacobson stated, specific to billboards, the data advertised was the Planning Commission's recommendation which was to ban billboards within these overlay districts. Mr. Daniel stated the Chair had accepted both amendments and inquired if these could be voted on separately. Mr. Micas stated the amendments were all inclusive to the motion and Mr. Mayes would have to accept those amendments. 87-608 Mr. Mayes stated the first amendment does not substantially alter the original and is just a technical change. Mr. Daniel stated the second amendment does offer substantial change in terms of billboards. Mr. Micas stated Mr. Dodd offered that as a complete motion. Mr. Mayes stated he would accept the technical amendments but he did not fully understand the impact of the others and could not accept them. Mr. Dodd offered a substitute motion for adoption of the proposed ordinance with the technical amendments and modifi- cation, as previously stated. Mrs. Girone inquired about Options A & B. Mr. Micas stated it includes the original package of amendments by Mr. Dodd which provides two overlay district opportunies relative to bill- boards. Mr. Daniel stated he understood that this application would absolutely prohibit billboards on Route 10 unless there was a request for Conditional Use Planned Development for B-3, M-2 or M-3 but billboards in any other area within the Overlay Dis- trict would be required to meet the criteria outlined in Option A. Mr. Micas stated, if approved, that would be correct. Mr. Applegate inquired if applicants can go to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance. Mr. Micas stated yes. Mrs. Girone stated, as a compromise, would it not be better to give the options of A or B. Mr. Daniel stated it cannot be given as an "either or" situation if you want it to be prohibi- ted subject to the Conditional Use process, etc. He stated billboards will still be permitted if the applicant can meet the standards as outlined by Mr. Dodd's motion then he can have billboards in any of the designated areas except for the Route 10 corridor. Mrs. Girone requested clarification if an applicant could apply to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance to permit a billboard anywhere. Mr. Micas stated an applicant could use the Conditional Use Planned Development process to obtain a billboard. Mr. Daniel stated that if an applicant applies to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance there has to be cause for a hardship and he failed to see how such justification could be provided. He stated if an applicant goes through the Condi- tional Use Planned Development process, which is a public process, there may be justifications for allowing a billboard in a given location; therefore, the opportunity for obtaining billboards is still available. Mr. Micas stated that is correct. Mr. Daniel stated there is still no second to the motion and asked for one. The motion failed for lack of a second. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the original motion was amended to include an amendment to Section 21-67.19, Use Limitations, as well as the technical amendments and the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 21-9, 21-21, 21-38, 21-78, 21-79, 21-80, 21-81, 21-83, 21-84, 21-85, 21-86, 21-88, 21-89, 21-90, 21-91, 21-93, 21-94, 21-95, 21-96, 21-98, 21-99, 21-100, 21-101, 21-103, 21-104, 21-105, 21-106, 21-115, 21-132, 21-133, 21-134, 21-135, 21-148, 21-149, 21-153, 21-154, 21-155, 21-156 AND ENACTING ARTICLE III.A., SECTIONS 21-77.16 THROUGH 21-77.20 RELATING TO R-88 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. 87-609 (1) That Section 21-3 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-3. Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section: ooo Office Park. A development that contains three or more separate office buildings planned, developed or managed as a unit related in location, size and types of uses to the area that the unit serves and providing on-site parking in relation- ship to the types and sizes of offices. ooo Shopping Center. A development that contains three or more commercial establishments planned, developed or managed as a unit related in location, size and type of shops to the area that the unit serves and providing on-site parking in relation- ship to the types and sizes of stores. ooo Sign. Any display of letters, figures, designs, devices, pictures, logos, emblems, insignia, numbers, lines or colors, or any combination thereof, visible to the public for the purpose of making anything known or attracting attention. The flag, emblem, insignia, poster or other display of a nation, political units, educational, charitable, religious or similar group, campaign, non-profit drive or event, or the architectur- al features or characteristics of a building which do not have an advertising message on or as an integral part thereof, shall not be included within the meaning of this definition. Nor shall any of the previously mentioned displays be included within the meaning of this definition when such displays are located within a building or other enclosure and are not visible from the exterior of the building or other enclosure. ooo Sign area. The area of a sign shall be determined from its outside measurements, including any framing, trim or molding, but excluding the height and width of supports and supporting structure. For the purpose of computing area, a sign consisting of two or more sides, where the interior angle between any of the sides exceeds sixty degrees, each side shall be counted when computing sign area. Sign, business. A sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, service or other activity conducted upon the premises upon which such sign is located. .~.ign, freestanding. A nonmovable sign supported by a fence, retaining wall, or by upright structural members or braces on or in the ground and not attached to a building. Sign, fixed. A sign attached, erected, or painted on the outside wall of a building and supported by any part of a building such as a wall, roof, window, canopy, awning, arcade, or marquee. Sign, portable. Any sign not permanently affixed to the ground nor to a building, which is designed or constructed in such a manner that it can be moved or relocated without involv- ing any structural or support changes (including any sign attached to or displayed on a vehicle that is used for the 87-610 express purpose of advertising a business establishment, product, or service, when the vehicle is parked so as to attract the attention of the motoring or pedestrian traffic. Sign, pylon. A freestanding sign that is supported by one or more poles or posts or other uprights and where the sign face is not encased within a structure. Sign, flashing or continuous reader board. Any sign displaying flashing or intermittent lights, or other lights of changing degree of intensity, brightness or color, or electron- ically moving copy. This definition shall not apply to signs which display public service information such as time, date, temperature, weather, or similar information provided the message does not change more frequently than once every ten seconds. Sign height. The vertical distance from the street grade or the average lot grade at the required minimum front setback line for signs, whichever allows for the greater heights, to the highest point of the sign. Sign, illuminated. A sign illuminated by artificial means either internally or externally and directed towards the sign. ooo Vehicle storage yard. Any exterior area within an auto- mobile dealership development or other similar business that is used exclusively for the storage of vehicles intended for sale and is not accessible to the general public. ooo (2) That Section 21-33 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-33. Dum~ster and garbage can areas. In all R-MF Districts, R-TH Districts, B Districts, and M Districts, solid waste storage areas (dumpster and garbage can) shall be screened from view by a solid fence, wall or dense evergreen plantings, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. (3) That Section 21-44(a) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-44. Setbacks for certain districts. (a) Ail buildings in the R-TH, B or M Districts shall have minimum fifty foot setbacks from the proposed rights-of- way of major arterials as indicated on the Chesterfield General Plan, as amended, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. ooo (4) That Section 21-51 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-51. Parking s~.ace area. Each off-street parking space shall be at least two hundred square feet in area and shall have a minimum width of ten feet, exclusive of access drives and aisles, and shall be of such shape and of such location and so improved as to be effectively usable, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. 87-611 (5) That Section 21-55(b) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-55. Off-street loading requirements. ooo (b) Each loading space shall be at least twelve feet wide, thirty-five feet long, plus space for maneuvering outside of a required yard or public right-of-way, and fifteen feet high, and shall be located so that no part of the vehicle is on any public right-of-way. Loading spaces may occupy any part of a required yard except a front yard, or may be contained within the building; provided, that no loading space shall be located closer than fifty feet to another lot in any R District unless completely enclosed within the building or by a wall or uni- formly painted solid board fence not less than eight feet high. In an M District, loading spaces may occupy any part of a front or street side yard when the loading facilities are delineated by a curb or bumper parallel with the property line to prevent encroachment on the right-of-way, and when curb and gutter, and storm sewer, all to County specifications, are provided. As applicable, the above requirements are subject to the provi- sions of Division 11.2. (6) That Section 21-56 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-56. Parking lot regulations. Every parking area for six or more vehicles shall be subject to the provisions of Division 11.2, as applicable, and the following regulations: ooo (7) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended be amended by enacting Section 21-58.1 as follows: Sec. 21-58.1 Applicability. Division 7 shall apply in all areas, subject to the provisions of Division 7.1 and Division 11.2. (8) That Section 21-63.1(b) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: ooo (a) The U.S. Route 60 special sign district shall include all parcels of land located within 300 feet of the closest boundaries of the right of way of U.S. Route 60 (Midlothian Turnpike) between State Route 868 (Grove Road) and the inter- section of Route 60 and the Southern Railway line unless the parcel on which the sign is located extends further than 300 feet, in which case the special sign district shall include such additional property for a maximum of 1500 feet. (b) Reserved. ooo (9) That Section 21-63.1.1 of the Code of the Count~ iof Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-63.1:1 Definitions. Delete and reserve this section. (10) That Section 21-64. of the Code of theiCounty of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: 87-612 Sec. 21-64. Generally. (a) No automobile service station, automobile repair shop, or public garage shall have a vehicular entrance or exit within two hundred feet of the premises of any school, public playground, church, hospital, public library or institution for children or dependents; and no part of any such service sta- tion, repair shop or garage shall be within one hundred feet of any of the said public, semi-public, or institutional buildings or properties. In all corner lots, all vehicular entrances and exits and all curb openings shall be setback at least twenty feet from the corner property lines extended or from the established right-of-way lines. Curbs shall be required for all service stations. Gas pumps shall be setback not less than twenty-five feet from established right-of-way lines. If the gas pumps are covered by a canopy, the canopy may extend three feet into the required setback. As applicable, the above requirements are subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. (3/14/73, 4/28/76) (11) That Section 21-67(b) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-67. Generally. The Board of Supervisors or Board of Zoning Appeals may require buffer strips, at the time of their final decision on applications lawfully before them, of such length, width and type as will effectively and appropriately screen one use from another use where such uses are deemed to be incompatible whether such uses be within the same district or in different districts. Such buffer strips, when required, shall not be used for any purpose other than the following: 000 (b) 11.2. Landscaping, subject to the provisions of Division OOO (12) That Section the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended be amended by enacting Division 11.2 and Sections 21-67.11 through 21-67.23 as follows: Division 11.2. Corridor Overlay District Sec. 21-67.11. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this division is to maintain the long-term function of major arterial roadways; to limit access and the number of conflict points and, thereby, reduce the need for additional crossover locations and traffic signals; to promote improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation; to encourage land assembly and the most desirable use of land in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan; to promote architectural continu- ity; to encourage designs which produce a desirable relation- ship between individual buildings, the circulation system and adjacent areas; and to permit a flexible response of develop- ment to the market as well as to provide incentives for the development of a variety of land uses and activities of high quality. Sec. 21-67.12. Areas of ApRlicability and Exemptions. (a) The Corridor Overlay District shall include all lands as specified herein: (i) Ail parcels of land located within 1,500 feet of the centerline of State Route 10 (Iron Bridge 87-613 Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. (b) (c) Road) between the Chesterfield County/City of Richmond line and the intersection of Route 10 and State Route 1506 (Buckingham Street) and between the intersection of Route 10 and Inter- state 95 and the intersection of Route 10 and Interstate 295. (2) Ail parcels of land located within 1,500 feet of the centerline of U. S. Route 360 (Hull Street Road) between State Route 650 (Turner Road) and State Route 667 (Otterdale Road). (3) Ail parcels of land located within 1,500 feet of the centerline of State Route 60 (Midlothian Turnpike) between the intersection of Route 60 and the Southern Railway line and the Chester- field County/Powhatan County line. (4) (5) (6) Ail parcels of land located at the interchange of State Route 10 (Iron Bridge Road) and State Route 288 and, specifically, within 1,500 feet of the centerline of any ramp comprising this interchange, whether constructed or planned. Ail parcels of land located at the interchange of Courthouse Road (State Route 604) and State Route 288 and, specifically, within 1,500 feet of the centerline of any ramp comprising this interchange, whether constructed or planned. Ail parcels of land located at the interchange of State Route 10 (Iron Bridge Road) and Chip- penham Parkway (State Route 150) and, specifi- cally, within 1,500 feet of the centerline of any ramp comprising this interchange, whether constructed or planned. (7) Ail parcels of land located at the interchange of State Route 10 (East Hundred Road) and State Route 1/295 and, specifically, within 1,500 feet of the centerline of any ramp comprising this interchange, whether constructed or planned. Residential uses in recorded subdivisions and in R-MF zoning districts shall be exempt from all standards of the Corridor Overlay District, with the exception of Section 21-67.23., relating to signs. Any Conditional Use Planned Development (CUPD) approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to August 12, 1987, shall be exempt from the requirements of this Division, except where such requirements are conditions of zoning. 21-67.13. Permitted Uses -- By Right. All uses permitted by right in the underlying zoning district(s). 21-67.14. Permitted Uses -- Accessory Uses. All uses permitted as accessory uses in the underlying zoning district(s). 21-67.15. Permitted Uses -- Conditional Uses. Ail uses permitted by Conditional Use in the underlying zoning district(s). 21-67.16. Permitted Uses -- Special Exceptions. All uses permitted by Special Exception in the underlying zoning district(s). 87-614 Sec. Sec. 21-67.17. Yard and Height Requirements. (a) Yards. The following yard requirement shall apply to any zoning lot or parcel, except any zoning lot or parcel located in an M-3 District, in which case, the yard requirements of the underlying zoning district will apply. (1) Setbacks along major arterials. Ail buildings, drives and parking areas shall have a minimum seventy-five foot setback from the proposed rights-of-way of major arterials as indicated on the Chesterfield General Plan, as amended. Within these setbacks, landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Section 21-67.22. The following yard requirements shall apply to any zoning lot or parcel, except any zoning lot or parcel located in an R-40, M-2 or M-3 District, in which case, the yard requirements of the underlying zoning district will apply. (2) Front yard. The front yard -setback for buildings, drives, and parking areas shall be a minimum of forty feet from public rights-of-way other than major arterials. (3) Side yards. The side yard setbacks for buildings, drives, and parking areas shall be a minimum of thirty feet. The minimum corner side yard shall be forty feet. One foot shall be added to each side yard for each three feet that the building height adjacent thereto exceeds forty-five feet or three stories, whichever is less, subject, however, to the provisions of Section 21-27. (4) Rear yard. The minimum rear yard setback for buildings, drives, and parking areas shall be forty feet. One foot shall be added to each rear yard for each three feet that the building height adjacent thereto exceeds forty-five feet or three stories, whichever is less, subject, however, to the provisions of Section 21-27. (b) Yards for gasoline pumps. The setbacks for gasoline pumps and drives serving gasoline pump islands shall be the same as those for buildings and drives, as required in this Section. (c) Height requirements. The maximum height of all buildings as permitted by Section 21-38 and the underlying zoning district(s). Special height restrictions apply along Route 10 because of Airport height restrictions. 21.67.18. Permitted Variations in Yard Requirements. The required minimum yards for any zoning lot or parcel, except those located in an M-2 or M-3 District, may be reduced with the provision of additional landscaping: (1) Setbacks along major arterials. The required setback for buildings, drives and parking areas along major arterials may be reduced to fifty (50) feet with the provision of landscaping in accordance with Section 21-67.22, Perimeter Landscaping C. (2) Front yard. The required front yard setback along public rights-of-way other than major arterials may be reduced to twenty-five (25) feet with the provision of landscaping in 87-615 Sec. Sec. accordance with Landscaping C. Section 21-67.22, Perimeter (3) Side yard. The required side yard may be reduced to ~en (10) feet with the provision of landscaping in accordance with Section 21-67.22, Perimeter Landscaping B, except when adjacent to any A, R, R-TH or R-MF District. The required corner side yard may be reduced to twenty-five (25) feet with the provision of landscaping in accordance with Section 21-67.22, Perimeter Landscaping C. (4) Rear yard. The required rear yard may be reduced to twenty (20) feet with the provision of landscaping in accordance with Section 21-67.22, Perimeter Landscaping B, except when adjacent to any A, R, R-TH or R-MF District. (5) Variations in yard requirements when adjacent to vacant land. When a required side or rear yard is adjacent to a vacant parcel in an A District and that parcel is designated for office, commercial, or industrial use by the County's Comprehensive Plan, then the required yard may be reduced in accordance with this Section. 21-67.19. Use Limitations. Ail uses shall be subject to the use limitations set forth in the underlying zoning district(s), and, in addition, uses that have drive-in windows and/or gasoline pumps, and all uses exclusively permitted in the General Business (B-3) District shall only be permitted when incorporated into a coordinated development of one or more parcels with an aggregate size of ten acres or more. 21-67.20. Access and Internal Circulation. (a) Purpose and Intent. The highway system in Chester- field County reflects a major public investment which should not be allowed to deteriorate as a result of poorly planned, indiscriminate development activit- ies, or inadequate consideration of future needs resulting from County and regional growth and deve- lopment. The County has a public trust responsibil- ity to manage and maintain effectively each highway within the County to preserve its functional integr ity and public purpose. Inappropriate land develop- ment activities and unrestricted access impair the purpose of these highways and damage the public investment in the County's highway system. Every owner of property which abuts a public highway within the County has a right to reasonable access to the general system of highways. This right of access is subject to regulation for the purpose of protect- ing the public health, safety, and welfare. The access rights of a property owner must be held subordinate to the public's right and interest in a safe and efficient highway system. It is, therefore, desirable for the County to estab- lish, through regulation, a system of access manage- ment which will protect the functional integrity of the highway system and the public investment in that system. The purpose and intent of this section is to maximize the functional capacity and maintain the level of service of major arterial roadways; to minimize the number of access points to major arterials and other public rights-of-way; to promote the sharing of 87-616 access and the ability to travel between sites; to provide pedestrian circulation networks among resi- dential, commercial, and recreational areas; and to enhance safety and convenience for users of the Corridor. (b) Access to Major Arterial Roads. (c) (d) (i) Direct access to major arterials shall be approved by the Director of Transportation or his agent. (2) Any parcel or lot having frontage along a major arterial and in existence prior to August 12, 1987, shall be permitted one direct access to that major arterial, unless an access plan is submitted to, and approved by, the Transporta- tion Department for more than one access. (3) At the time of plan submission and approval, if two or more parcels in existence prior to August 12, 1987, are placed under one ownership, control and/or maintenance, such assembly shall be permitted one direct access to the major arterial, unless an access plan is submitted to, and approved by, the Transportation Department for more than one access. (4) Direct access shall be provided by, but not be limited to, one or more of the following means: (a) Access to the site may be provided by an existing or planned public street; and/or (b) Access to the site may be provided via the internal circulation of a shopping center, an office complex, or similar group of buildings having access in accordance with an approved access plan; and/or (c) Access to the site may be provided by a service drive; and/or (d) Access may be provided via individual or shared access. (5) Developers of all parcels or lots located at existing or proposed crossovers shall submit, prior to site plan approval, an access plan to the Transportation Department for approval which addresses access for the surrounding area. The access plan shall demonstrate the ability to provide adequate access to surrounding proper- ties via a cross-easement agreement(s) or document of same as shared access and/or a public road(s). Internal Circulation. Sites shall be designed to achieve direct and convenient pedestrian and vehi- cular circulation between adjacent properties, unless otherwise required by the Transportation Department. Access Plan. An access plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Transportation Department, prior to site plan approval. Such access plan shall be drawn to scale, including dimensions and distances, and clearly delineate the traffic circulation system and the pedestrian circulation system as coordinated with that on adjacent properties, including the location and width of all streets, driveways, access aisles, entrances to parking areas, walkways and bicycle paths. 87-617 Sec. (e) Traffic Impact Analysis. A Traffic Impact Analysis shall be submitted to,.and approved by, the Transpor- tation Department under the following circumstances: (1) any proposed development which is expected to generate 10,000 Average Daily Trips (ADT) or more based on trip generation rates as defined by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' publication, Trip Generation, or (2) at the request of the Transportation Department, when the proposed development is expected to significantly impact the transportation network. 21-67.21. Development Standards. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Utility lines underground. Ail utility lines such as electric, telephone, CATV, or other similar lines shall be installed underground. This requirement shall apply to lines serving individual sites as well as to utility lines necessary within the project. All junction and access boxes shall be screened with appropriate landscaping. All utility pad fixtures and meters should be shown on the site plan. The necessity for utility connections, meter boxes, etc., should be recognized and integrated with the archi- tectural elements of the site plan. Loading areas. Sites shall be designed and buildings shall be oriented so that loading areas are not visible from any of the project perimeters adjoining any A, R, R-TH, R-MF, or O District or any public right-of-way. Architectural treatment. No building exterior (whether front, side, or rear) will consist of architectural materials inferior in quality, appear- ance, or detail to any other exterior of the same building. Nothing in this section shall preclude the use of different materials on different building exteriors (which would be acceptable if representa- tive of good architectural design) but rather, shall preclude the use of inferior materials on sides which face adjoining property and thus, might adversely impact existing or future development causing a substantial depreciation of property values. No portion of a building constructed of unadorned cinder block or corrugated and/or sheet metal shall be visible from any adjoining A, R, R-TH, R-MF, or 0 District or any public right-of-way. Mechanical equipment, whether ground-level or rooftop, shall be shielded and screened from public view and designed to be perceived as an integral part of the building. Exterior lighting. Ail exterior lights shall be arranged and installed so that the direct or reflect- ed illumination does not exceed 0.5 foot candles above background measured at the lot line of any adjoining residential or agricultural parcel. Lighting standards shall be of a directional type capable of shielding the light source from direct view from any adjoining residential or agricultural parcel and public right-of-way. Driveways and parking areas. Driveways and parking areas shall be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete, or other similar material. Surface treated parking areas and drives shall be prohibited. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the perimeter of all driveways and parking areas. Other curbing material of similar quality like brick or cobblestone shall be permitted at the discretion of the Director of Planning. Drainage shall be 87-618 Sec. (f) designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian traffic. Outside storage areas. Outdoor storage as permitted by the underlying zoning districts, provided that all outdoor storage areas shall be visually screened from Dublic streets, internal roadways, and adjacent Droperty. Screening shall consist of either a solid board fence, masonry wall, dense evergreen plant materials or such other materials as may be approved. All such screening shall be of sufficient height to screen storage areas from view. Outdoor storage shall include the parking of all company owned and operated vehicles, with the exception of passenger vehicles. 21-67.22. Landscaping Requirements. (a) Purpose and Intent. A comprehensive landscaping program for each indivi- dual lot or parcel within the Overlay District is essential for the visual enhancement of the Corridor; and to protect and promote the appearance, character, and economic values of land along the corridor and surrounding neighborhoods. The purpose and intent of such landscaping requirements is also to reduce the visibility of paved areas from adjacent properties and streets, moderate climatic effects, minimize noise and glare, and enhance public safety by defin- ing spaces to influence traffic movement. Landscap- ing will reduce the amount of storm water runoff and provide transition between neighboring properties. (b) Landscaping Plan and Planting Requirements. (1) A landscaping plan shall be submitted in con- junction with final site plan approval. (2) Such landscaping plan shall be drawn to scale, including dimensions and distances, and clearly delineate all existing and proposed parking spaces or other vehicle areas, access aisles, driveways, and the location, size and descrip- tion of all landscaping materials. (c) Plsnt Materials Specificst]ons. (1) Quality. Ail plant materials shall b~ ].lying and in a healthy condition. Plant materials used in conformance with the provision of these specifi- cations shall conform to the standards of the most recent edition of the "American Standard for Nursery Stock," published by the American Association n~ Nurserymen. (2) Size and Type. (a) Small Deciduous Trees. Small deciduous trees shall be of a species having an average minimum mature crown spread of greater than twelve (12) feet. A minimum caliper of at least two and one-hal~ (2 1/2) inches at the uime of planting shall be required. (b) Large Deciduous Trees. Large deciduous trees shall be of a species having an average minimum mature crown spread of greater than thirty (30) feet. A minimum caliper of at least three and one-half (3 87-619 1/2) inches at the time of planting shall be required. (d) Evergreen trees. Evergreen trees shall have a minimum height of five (5) feet at the time of planting. Medium shrubs. Shrubs and hedge forms shall have a minimum height of two (2) feet at the time of planting. (3) Landscaping Design. (a) (b) Generally, planting required by this section should be in an irregular line and spaced at random. (c) Clustering of plant and tree species shall be required to provide a pleasing composi- tion and mix of vegetation. Decorative walls and fences may be integra- ted into any landscaping program. The use of such walls or fences, when having a minimum height of three (3) feet, may reduce the amount of required plant mater- ials at the discretion of the Director of Planning. (4) Tree Preservation. Preservation of existing trees is encouraged to provide continuity, improved buffering ability, pleasing scale and image along the Corridor. (a) (b) Any healthy existing tree may be included for credit towards the requirements of this Section. If any preserved tree that has been credited dies within three (3) years of construction, one (1) tree shall be planted for each tree lost. Ail existing trees on the site shall be shown on the required landscaping plan, or where there are groups of trees, said stands may be outlined. Trees desired to be removed shall be clearly delineated on the landscaping plan. (d) Maintenance. (e) (1) The owner, or his agent, shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, and replacement of all landscaping materials as may be required by the provisions of this Article. (2) Ail plant material shall be tended and maintain- ed in a healthy growing condition and free from refuse and debris at all times. All unhealthy, dying or dead plant materials shall be replaced during the next planting season. (3) Ail landscaped areas shall be provided with a readily available water supply. The utilization of underground storage chambers to collect runoff to be later used to irrigate plant materials is encouraged. Installation and Bonding Requirements. (i) Ail landscaping shall be installed in a sound, workmanship-like manner and according to accept- ed, good planting practices and procedures. 87-620 Landscaped areas shall require protection from vehicular encroachment by such means as, but not limited to, wheel stops or concrete or bitumin- ous curbs. (2) Where landscaping is required, no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the required landscaping is completed in accordance with the approved landscape plan. When the occupancy of a structure is desired prior to the completion of the required landscaping, a certificate of occupancy may be issued only if the owner or developer provides to the County a form of surety satisfactory to the Planning Department in an amount equal to the costs of the remaining plant materials, related materials and installa- tion costs. (3) Ail required landscaping shall be installed and approved by the first planting season following issuance of a certificate of occupancy or the bond may be forfeited to the County. This requirement shall not preclude the phasing of landscaping programs for larger development projects, the timing of which, shall be approved by the Director of Planning. (f) Arterial Frontage Landscaping. Landscaping shall be required along major arterial roadways within the required setback of any lot or parcel and shall be provided except where driveways or other openings may be necessary. The minimum required landscaping for this setback shall be provided as per Perimeter Landscaping B below. (g) Perimeter Landscaping. Landscaping shall be required at the outer boundaries or in the required yards of a lot or parcel or development and shall be provided except where driveways or other openings may be required. The minimum required landscaping for all outer boundaries of any lot or parcel shall be provided as per Peri- meter Landscaping A below. There shall be different landscaping requirements as identified herein, which shall be provided as follows: (1) Perimeter Landscaping A. (a) At least one small deciduous tree for each fifty lineal feet and at least one ever- green for each fifty lineal feet shall be planted within the setback area. (b) At least one medium shrub for each twenty lineal feet shall be planted within the setback area. (c) Low shrubs and ground cover reasonably dispersed throughout. shall be (2) Perimeter Landscaping B. (a) At least one large deciduous tree for each fifty lineal feet and at least one ever- green for each thirty lineal feet shall be planted within the setback area. (b) At least one small deciduous tree for each fifty lineal feet shall be planted within the setback area. 87-621 (c) (d) At least one medium shrub for each fifteen lineal feet shall be planted within the setback area. Low shrubs and ground cover reasonably dispersed throughout. shall be OR: (a) A minimum three (3) foot high undulating berm, and (b) Perimeter Landscaping A. (3) Perimeter Landscaping C. (a) At least one large deciduous tree for each fifty lineal feet and at least one ever- green tree for each thirty lineal feet shall be planted within the setback area. (b) At least one small deciduous tree for each thirty lineal feet shall be planted within the setback area. (c) At least one medium shrub for each ten lineal feet shall be planted within the setback area. (d) Low shrubs and ground cover reasonably dispersed throughout. shall be OR: (a) A minimum four berm, and (4) foot high undulating (b) Perimeter Landscaping B. (h) Landscaping Standards for Parking Areas. (1) Interior parking area landscaping. (a) Any parking area shall have at least twenty (20) square feet of interior landscaping for each space. Each required landscaped area shall contain a minimum of 100 square feet and have a minimum dimension of at least 9.5 feet. With the provision of this landscaping, parking space size may be reduced to 171.0 square feet. Minimum width shall be 9.5 feet; minimum length shall be 18 feet. (b) The primary landscaping material used in parking areas shall be trees which provide shade or are capable of providing shade at maturity. Each required landscaped area shall include at least one small tree, as outlined in this Section. The total number of trees shall not be less than one for each 200 square feet, or fraction thereof, of required interior landscaped area. The remaining area shall be landscaped with shrubs and other vegetative material to compliment the tree landscaping. (c) Landscaping areas shall be reasonably dispersed throughout, located so as to divide and break up the expanse of paving. The area designated as required setbacks shall not be calculated as required land- scaped area. 87-622 Sec. (2) Peripheral parking area landscaping. (a) Peripheral landscaping shall be required along any side of a parking area that abuts land not in the right of way of a street such that: A landscaped strip at least ten feet in width shall be located between the parking area and the abutting property lines, except where driveways or other openings may be required. Continuous hedge forms or at least one small tree, as outlined in this Section, shall be planted in the landscaped strip for each fifty lineal feet. (3) Special design storage yards. considerations for vehicular (a) The landscaping requirements set forth by this Section shall apply to automobile dealerships or other similar businesses in the same manner as to any other permitted use, except for approved vehicular storage yards. (b) Any vehicular storage yard shall be enclos- ed by a solid board fence, masonry wall, or a combination of wooden lattice and dense evergreens having a minimum height of six (6) feet. Large expanses of fence or wall surface shall be architecturally designed or landscaped to prevent monotony. Vehicle storage yards shall not be accessible to the general public. 21-67.23. Limitation of Siqns. (a) Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this section is to regulate the use of publicly visible displays or graphics to protect and enhance the character of major arterial roadways and surrounding areas; to prevent diminishing property values within these areas; to safeguard the public use and nature of major arterial roadways; and to minimize visual distractions to motorists along public roads. (b) General regulations for all Signs. The following shall apply to all signs: (1) Applicable State and Federal sign controls. (2) A County sign permit for all signs over six square feet in area shall be required. (3) Applications for permits shall be submitted on forms obtained at the office of the building inspector. After the Building Official insures that the application com- plies with the requirements of the Uniform Statewide Building Code, he shall forward the application to the Department of Planning, which shall check for compliance with the regulations of this chapter. Once compliance is determined, the application shall be returned to the Building Official, who shall issue the sign permit. Each application shall be accompanied by plans, showing the size, location, and property identification. In the case of projecting signs and outdoor advertising structures, 87-623 (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) complete specifications and methods of anchoring and support shall be required. Each sign and outdoor advertising structure shall have the permit number and date of issuance affixed. Signs and advertising structures shall not obstruct any window, door, fire escape, stairway, ladder or opening intended to provide light, air or ingress and egress for any building or structure. Whenever a sign or outdoor advertising structure becomes structurally unsafe or endangers the safety of a building or premises or endangers the public safety, it shall be made safe or removed in accordance with the Uniform Statewide Building Code. Where permits are required, all signs, including directional signs, shall be set back at least fifteen feet from the front property lines or existing right-of-way lines unless a greater setback is speci- fied. Along roads which have proposed right-of-way expansion as delineated in the General Plan for Chesterfield County, signs erected after the delineation of such roads on the Plan may be located within the proposed right-of-way. Once the proposed right-of-way is acquired, all signs erected after the delineation of such roads on the Plan must be set back the required fifteen foot minimum from the new right-of-way unless a greater setback is specified. Sign lighting shall be positioned and shielded so as not to impair the vision of any motor vehicle operator or cause any direct glare into or upon any property other than the property to which the sign may be accessory. Outdoor advertising signs shall be prohibi- ted within the Overlay District. Portable signs shall be prohibited on a temporary or permanent basis within the Overlay District. Pylon Signs shall be prohibited within the Overlay District. Interchangeable copy signs and rate and price signs for service stations shall be allowed if integrated into the freestanding identification sign. An abandoned sign shall be removed by the owner of the sign or the owner or lessee of the property. Any sign located on property which becomes vacant and is unoccupied for a period of two (2) years or more shall be deemed abandoned. If the owner or lessee fails to remove the sign, the Director of Planning shall give the owner fifteen (15) days written notice to remove it. Upon failure to comply with this notice, the Director of Planning may initiate such action as may be necessary to gain compli- ance with this regulation. No sign shall be higher than the roof line 87-624 or parapet wall of any building for which the sign is proposed. A sign may be attached to the facia of a shed roof of a structure but may not be located so as to extend above the upper edge of the facia of said shed roof. Also, a sign may be attached to the facia of or located on the sloping roof of a structure, but may not be located so as to extend more than four feet above the lower edge of said sloping roof. Permitted Signs. (1) One sign not exceeding one square foot in area, identifying a dwelling, its occupant, its location, or a customary incidental home occupa- tion. (2) One name sign or bulletin board not exceeding twenty square feet in area for any club, church, school, or other public or semi-public institu- tion. (3) One temporary real estate sign, not exceeding four square feet in area in a Residential or Agricultural District and not more than thirty- two square feet in area in all other districts, advertising the sale or rent of the premises. Such sign shall be located on the premises at least twenty feet from the nearest corner of a street intersection, shall not be illuminated, shall be neatly painted or maintained, and shall be removed within ten days after the transfer of title or rental of such property. (4) Temporary off-site real estate signs, not exceeding two square feet in area, directing the way to premises which are for sale or rent. Such signs shall be limited to one per parcel (lot) of land, with no more than three signs along any one street, set back at least fifteen feet from the edge of the right of way. Such signs shall be placed on a structure designed for the sole purpose of supporting the sign and such signs shall be properly printed or painted and maintained and shall be removed within ten days after the transfer of title or rental of such property. (5) Signs displayed for the purpose of farm identi- fication shall be located on the farm premises, shall be set back at least fifty feet from the nearest corner or a street intersection, shall be neatly painted or printed and maintained and shall not be illuminated. The total aggregate area of all signs shall not exceed twelve square feet. (6) One temporary sign advertising the sale of farm products grown or produced on the premises; provided, that such sign shall not exceed twelve square feet in area, and shall not be less than fifteen feet from any street right of way or lot line. Such sign shall not be illuminated, shall be neatly painted or printed, maintained and shall be removed within ten days after the end of each season. (7) Directional signs not over three square feet in area, indicating the location of churches, schools, hospitals, parks, scenic or historic places, or other places of general public interest. Any such signs and mounting shall not 87-625 exceed seven feet in total height and not more than one sign neatly painted or printed, per- taining to a single place, shall be displayed along any one street. (8) One temporary on-site real estate sign, not exceeding thirty-two square feet in area, advertising a residential development project provided such sign shall be removed when eighty percent of the dwelling units in the project are occupied. (9) One temporary sign not exceeding twenty square feet in area may be installed and maintained on the premises for the purpose of advertising the use to be made of the building or structure and the businesses and firms developing the building or structure. Such sign shall be placed on the premises so as not to interfere with the vision of motor vehicle operators and may be installed only when actual construction is started and shall be removed from the premises upon occu- pancy of the building or structure. (10) A permanent sign, not exceeding twenty square feet in area or ten feet in overall height, identifying the name and nature of a residential development. One such sign shall be permitted on the premises for each separate street en- trance to the development. (11) On individual parcels or lots having two (2) acres or less, one freestanding business sign per parcel or lot not exceeding fifty (50) square feet in area is permitted on the premises in all underlying business, office, or indus- trial districts. On individual parcels or lots having more than two (2) acres, one freestanding business sign per parcel or lot not exceeding one hundred (100) square feet in area is permit- ted. When the side or rear lot line adjoins an R, R-TH, R-MF, or A District, the exterior signs shall be attached flat against the building and shall not face the adjacent lot located in an R, R-TH, R-MF, or A District, unless such sign is located at least one hundred and fifty feet from the R, R-TH, R-MF, or A District. Business signs may be integral with or attached to the main building, or major appendage thereof, and shall not project from the building or appendage more than eighteen inches. The aggregate sign area of all business signs to include freestand- ing, fixed, and outdoor advertising signs, on any one lot shall not exceed one square foot for each two feet of lot frontage (on corner lots, either the front lot line or the corner side lot line, but not both, may be used to compute sign area, regardless of road classification) provid- ed that a minimum of twenty square feet or a maximum of one hundred fifty square feet shall be permitted. Business signs shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. (12) In shopping centers, office parks, or similar groups of buildings, one freestanding business sign not exceeding one hundred square feet in area and twenty feet in height, identifying the development and announcing only the name or location of the shopping center or office park and business names of tenants therein. If a shopping center or office park fronts along two major arterials as indicated on the Chesterfield General Plan, as amended, a freestanding sign 87-626 may be permitted along each major arterial. Ail individual business signs within a shopping center or office park shall be attached to the main building or major appendage including, but not limited to canopies, marquees, and awnings. Where the side or rear lot line adjoins an R, R-TH, R-MF, or A District, the exterior signs shall be attached flat against the building and shall not face the adjacent lot in an R, R-TH, R-MF, or A District. No sign shall project more than eighteen inches from the building or major appendage. The aggregate sign area of all individual business signs for any one business shall not exceed one square foot for each two feet of store frontage provided that a minimum of twenty square feet and a maximum of one- hundred fifty square feet shall be permitted. (13) Directional signs indicating location of truck entrances, employee parking, shipping and receiving, and similar activities; provided that all such signs are located on the property of the business and no such sign exceeds ten feet in height and five square feet in area. (14) A shopping center, office park, or similar group of buildings may have one freestanding on-site directory sign near each major entrance. Such sign(s) shall be limited to identifying and providing directional information to the indivi- dual businesses located within the shopping center, office park, or similar group of build- ings. This sign area shall not exceed twenty square feet in area and eight feet in height or be located within a complex so as to be a traffic and/or safety hazard. (15) One detached menu order board for restaurants with drive-thru facilities. Sign shall not exceed a height of six (6) feet nor exceed thirty (30) square feet in area. (d) Sign Design Standards. Design Concept (1) A unified system of signage and graphics shall be designed for each individual development. Letter style, graphic display, and color shall be analogous for all signage and graphics within an individual development. Signage concepts should be considered during the design of buildings, so that signage and graphics are architecturally incorporated into those build- ings and the site they inhabit. Size, height, location, material, and color should strongly relate to building and site design. (2) Freestanding sign design. Freestanding signs shall be encased within a structure that is architecturally related to and compatible with the main building(s) and overall architectural design of the development. (3) Landscaping. Landscaping shall be integrated with each individual freestanding sign. Clus- tering of plant species shall be required to provide a pleasing composition and mix of vegetation. This requirement shall be depicted on the landscaping plan as required in Section 21-67.22. 87-627 Sec. (4) Illumination. (a) External illumination. External lighting shall be limited to light fixtures utiliz- ing white, not colored, lighting and shall not be blinking, fluctuating, or moving. External lighting shall be provided by con- cealed and/or screened spots or floods and shall be arranged and installed so that direct or reflected illumination does not exceed 0.5 foot candles above background measured at the lot line of any adjoining residential or agricultural parcel or public right-of-way. (b) Internal illumination. Internal lighting shall be limited to internal light contain- ed within translucent letters and internal illuminated sign boxes, provided the background or field on which the copy and/or logos are placed, is opaque. The area illuminated is restricted to the sign face only. The direct or reflected illumi- nation shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles above background measured at the lot line of any adjoining residential or agricultur- al parcel or public right-of-way. (5) Sign Package. Prior to the erection of any sign, with the exception of temporary construc- tion signs noted herein, a comprehensive sign package shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. The sign package shall provide detailed renderings to include colors, sizes, lighting, location, etc. for all signs within any development. 21-67.24. Plan Submission Requirements. (a) Uses requiring submission of plans. Ail uses within the Overlay District shall be requir- ed to file plans to assure compliance of all appli- cable requirements of this Chapter. (b) Required information. Plan submission as herein required shall include the following: (1) Site plans in accordance with the provi- sions of Division 12 of this Article; (2) Landscaping plans to include plant names (Latin and common) and sizes at installa- tion; (3) Architectural renderings and/or elevations to include materials and colors; (4) Access plan which may be presented as part of the site plan. (c) Administrative responsibility. The Director of Planning shall approve, approve subject to conditions, or disapprove plans in accor- dance with the reviewing authorities' recommenda- tions. He shall return notification of plan review results to the applicant, including recommended conditions or modifications. In the event that the results and/or recommended conditions or modifica- 87-628 (d) tions are acceptable to the applicant, the plan shall be so modified, if required, and approved. Denial of plan; appeal of conditions or modifica- tions. In the event the plans are disapproved or recommended conditions or modifications are unacceptable to the applicant, said plans shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review. The plans shall be approved by the Planning Commission if they find such plans to be in accordance with all applicable Ordi- nances and include necessary elements to mitigate any detrimental impact upon adjacent property and the surrounding area. If the Planning Commission finds that said plans do not meet the above stated cri- teria, they shall deny approval of said plans. ooo (13) That Section 21-119 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-119. Front yard required. The minimum front yard of a mobile home park adjacent to a public street shall be fifty feet, such distance to be measured between the front property line and the nearest mobile home or other structure, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. (14) That Section 21-120 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-120. Side and rear yards required. The minimum side and rear yards of a mobile home park shall be fifteen feet, such distance to be measured between the park property line and the nearest mobile home or other struc- ture. Except along park property lines which are adjacent to a natural drainage area or a limited access highway, side and rear yards shall contain a screen, fence or landscape planting which shall be designed and planted to be fifty percent or more solid when viewed horizontally between two and six feet above average ground level. As applicable, the above requirements shall be subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. (15) That Section 21-125 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-125. Parking. At least two parking spaces (ten feet by twenty feet) shall be provided for each mobile home space on, or adjacent to, or in a consolidated parking area within sixty feet of the mobile home space, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. All required parking areas shall be of hard surface, dustless construction. (16) That Section 21-128 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-128. Refuse disposal. The storage and collection of refuse shall be so managed as to not create a health or fire hazard. All refuse shall be stored in fly proof, watertight, rodent proof containers which shall be provided in sufficient capacity, subject to the 87-629 provisions of Division 11.2. The park management shall be responsible for the collection and proper disposal of all refuse. (17) That Section 21-149(c) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-149. Same--Accessory uses. The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the 0 District: ooo (c) Signs as regulated in Division 7~ Division 7.1 or Division 11.2. (18) That Section 21-152 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-152. Required conditions. The following conditions shall be met in the O District, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: ooo (19) That Section 21-153(7) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-153. Permitted uses--By right. Within any B-1 District, no building, structure, or premises shall be used or arranged or designed to be used in any part except for one or more of the following uses, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: ooo (20) That Section 21-154(c) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-154. Same--Accessory uses. The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the B-1 District: ooo (c) Signs as regulated in Division 7, Division 7.1 or Division 11.2. ooo (21) That Section 21-157 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-157. Required conditions. The following conditions shall be met in the B-1 District, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: ooo (22) That Section 21-158 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: 87-630 Sec. 21-158. Permitted uses--By right. Within any B-2 District, no building, structure or pre- mises shall be used or arranged or designed to be used in any part except for one or more of the following uses, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: OOO (23) That Section 21-159(c) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21.159. Same--Accessory uses. The following accessory uses shall be allowed in the B-2 District: OOO (c) Signs as regulated in Division 7, Division 7.1 or Division 11.2. (24) That Section 21-160(c) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-160. Same--Conditional uses. The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses in the B-2 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-34: OOO (c) Drive-in establishments, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. OOO (25) That Section 21-161(b) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-161. Same--Special exceptions. The following uses may be permitted as special exceptions in the B-2 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-15: OOO (b) Outdoor advertising signs, provided that they shall not be erected within two hundred feet of any park or school and shall be less than twenty-five feet in height, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. OOO (26) That Section 21-163 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-163. Permitted uses--By r.i~ht. Within any B-3 District, no building, structure, or premises shall be used or arranged or designed to be used in any part except for one or more of the following uses, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: OOO (27) That Section 21-164(c) of the Cod? of the County .o.f Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: 87-631 Sec. 21-164. Same--Accessory uses. The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the B-3 District: ooo (c) Signs as regulated in Division 7, Division 7.1 or Division 11.2. (28) That Section 21-169(b) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-169. Same--Accessory uses. The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the B-T District: ooo (b) Signs as regulated by Division 7, Division 7.1 or Division 11.2. (29) That Section 21-173 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-173. Front yard required. Any yard of a travel trailer park adjacent to a public street shall be fifty feet, said distance to be measured between the front property line and the nearest travel trailer or other structure, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. (30) That Section 21-174 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-174. Side yard and rear yards required. The minimum side and rear yards of a travel trailer park shall be thirty-five feet, said distance to be measured between the park property line and the nearest travel trailer or other structure. Except along property lines which are adjacent to a natural drainage area, limited access highway, railroad, or M District, side and rear yards shall include a one hundred percent solid and sightly fence not less than five, nor more than six feet, in height or solid landscaping planting of not less than five feet in height or other natural conditions to provide such a barrier. As applicable, the above requirements shall be subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. (31) That Section 21-181 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-181. Permitted uses--By right. Within any M-1 District, no building, structure or pre- mises shall be used, arranged, or designed to be used in any part, except for one or more of the following uses, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: ooo (32) That Section 21-182(b) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-182. Same--Accessory uses. The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the M-1 District: 87-632 ooo (b) Signs as regulated in Division 7, Division 7.1 or Division 11.2. (33) That Section 21-184(b) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-184. Same--Special exceptions. The following uses may be permitted as special exceptions in the M-1 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-15: ooo (b) Outdoor advertising signs, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2. (34) That Section 21-185 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-185. Required conditions. The following conditions shall be met in the M-1 District, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: ooo (35) That Section 21-186 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-186. Permitted uses--By right. Within any M-2 District, no building, structure or pre- mises shall be used, arranged or designed to be used in any part, except for one of the following uses, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: ooo (36) That Section 21-187(c) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-187. Same--Accessory uses. The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the M-2 District: ooo (c) Signs as regulated in Division 7, Division 7.1 or Division 11.2. (37) That Section 21-190 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-190. Required conditions. The following conditions shall be met in the M-2 District, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: ooo (38) That Section 21-191 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: 87-633 Sec. 21-191. Permitted uses--By right. Within any M-3 District, no building, structure or pre- mises shall be used or arranged or designed to be used in any part except for one or more of the following uses, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: ooo (39) That Section 21-192(c) of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-192. Same--Accessory uses. The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the M-3 District: ooo (c) Signs as regulated in Division 7, Division 7.1 or Division 11.2. (40) That Section 21-195 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 21-195. Required conditions. The following conditions shall be met in the M-3 District, subject to the provisions of Division 11.2: ooo The Board being polled, the vote was as follows: Mr. Daniel - Aye Mr. Mayes - Aye Mr. Applegate - Aye Mrs. Girone - Aye Mr. Dodd - Nay The Board recessed for five minutes. Reconvening: Mr. Dodd and Mr. Applegate excused themselves from the meeting. 15. 19EW BUSINESS 15.A. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 15.A.1. RENEWAL RATES FOR COUNTY HEALTH CARE COVERAGE AND ESTABLISHMENT OF HEALTH CARE RESERVE FUND On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the proposed renewal rates for Group Health Care Plans for October 1, 1987 through September 30, 1988, providing three options (Equicor [United Medical], Prucare and KeyCare, includ- ing Basic and/or High Option Dental Coverage); and authorized the establishment of a Health Care Reserve Fund, held by the County, to offset any potential deficits in health care plans. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes and Mrs. Girone. Absent: Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dodd. 87-634 15.A.2. ADOPTION OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FLEXIBLE COMPEN SATION PLAN UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 125 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, under the provisions of Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Service Code of 1954, Chesterfield County employees may direct the County to purchase dependent health care coverage from their gross compensation and thereby reduce the level of taxable income by the amount of that dependent coverage; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors believe it to be in the best interests of Chesterfield County and its employees to adopt a plan which meets the requirement of Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Service Code for all employees eligible to participate thereunder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that effective October 1, 1987 the County of Chesterfield adopts the Chesterfield County Flexible Compensation Plan and that Lane B. Ramsey, Acting County Administrator be and is hereby authorized and instructed to take any action and execute any instruments deemed necessary and desirable to carry into effect said Plan, including any required amendments required by law to continue the Plan. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes and Mrs. Girone. Absent: Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dodd. 15.B. BUDGET CHANGES 15.B.1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT Chief Eanes stated Board approval is requested for an appro- priation of $67,000 of unanticipated revenue to the Fire Department for the purchase of emergency medical equipment (i.e., heart defibrillators and infectious disease control equipment) and training in the use of the equipment, in parti- cipation with the Chesterfield Volunteer Rescue Squad Associa- tion, Inc. to train the departments' emergency medical techni- cians, qualify firefighters to the next higher EMT level and enable the department to initiate a pilot program to include approximately one-fourth the EMS delivery area. He stated revenue estimates provided to Chesterfield by the State were lower than what was actually received resulting in an excess revenue of $67,071.48 for FY87, which funds reverted to the Fund Balance at June 30, 1987. Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dodd returned to the meeting. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved and appropriated $67,000 of unanticipated revenue from the FY87 Fund Balance to the Fire Department for the purchase of emergency medical equipment and training in the use of the equipment ($35,000 for EMT-D equipment; $2,000 for defibrilla- tor training; $7,000 for FLSA required overtime; $20,000 for infectious disease control equipment; and $3,000 for infectious disease control training). Vote: Unanimous 15.B.2. APPROPRIATION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO ALLOW USE OF DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS REVENUES FOR SAFETY TOWN AND ACCIDENT PREVENTION PURPOSES Mr. Hammer introduced Highway Safety Commissioner Bruce Wingo who made a presentation regarding the need for public awareness for the use of seatbelts and the continuation/expansion of 87-635 school-based safety programs, including Highway Safety Councils to provide proactive prevention programs for the County's youth population. Mrs. Girone stated she would like to see use of defensive driving class revenues for Safety Town and accident prevention purposes established as an on-going policy in the County and a new accountability center in the budget. It was generally agreed to appropriate $52,000 for these programs at this time but, in the future, such requests should be submitted through the normal review process for the budget. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and appropriated $52,000 from the General Fund to the Highway Safety Commission responsibility center for developing prevention programs for (1) safety belts and (2) school-based accident prevention programs. (It is noted that in future years such items must be requested through the normal budget review process.) Vote: Unanimous 15.C. CONTRACT FOR BROKERAGE SERVICES FOR LEASE/PURCHASE FINANCING FOR COURTS BUILDING On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute the necessary documents to award any necessary con- tracts for senior co-manager brokerage services to Wheat First Securities and co-manager brokerage services to Bankers Trust Company of New York, respectively, for the lease/purchase financing for the Courts Building. (It is noted this includes the $250,000 for the jail annex project.) Vote: Unanimous 15.D. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATES 15.D.1. TO CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY AT AIRPORT INDUS- TRIAL PARK 15.D.l.b. TERRY T. FIELDS On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute a contingent sales contract for the sale of a 4 + acre tract on Whitepine Road, located adjacent to Reynolds-- Metals and a future road in Phase II of the Airport Industrial Park at $38,000 per acre and set the date of September 9, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider the said conveyance to Mr. Terry T. Fields. Vote: Unanimous 15.D.I.c. VIVIAN E. PACE AND PAULINE G. PACE On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute a contingent sales contract for the sale of a 7.6 + acre tract on Whitepine Road, at $38,000 per acre, and set the date of September 9, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider the said conveyance to Ms. Vivian E. Pace and Ms. Pauline G. Pace. Vote: Unanimous 87-636 15.D.l.d. YOUNG MOVING AND STORAGE, INC. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute a contingent sales contract for the sale of approxi- mately 4 acres of land fronting on Whitepine Road, located approximately 1,850 feet from the intersection of Whitepine Road and Reycan Road, at $37,500 per acre and set the date of September 9, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider the said conveyance to Young Moving and Storage, Inc. and agree that the five acre tract along White Bark Terrace is available for conveyance to other interested parties. Vote: Unanimous 15.D.l.e. BILL LINDSEY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute a contingent sales 'contract for the sale of a 2.1 + acre tract at the end of White Bark Terrace, west of th~ Strahan Ink & Lacquer Corporation, at $38,000 per acre and set the date of September 9, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider the said conveyance to Mr. William Lindsey. Vote: Unanimous 15.D.2. TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 7 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, REGARD- ING CABLE TELEVISION On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board set the date of September 9, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 7 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, regarding cable television. Vote: Unanimous 15.D.3. TO CONSIDER PROPERTIES FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION Mr. Sale stated on June 10, 1987, the Board of Supervisors nominated eleven (11) properties to be considered for historic landmark designation. He stated subsequent to that meeting the Planning Commission and the Preservation Committee held a joint public hearing to consider the eleven (11) properties and, as a result of the meeting, nine properties were recommended for nomination and two properties, Richmond View and Chester Presbyterian Church, were deferred for further consideration by the Planning Commission and the Preservation Committee. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board set the date of September 9, 1987, at 7:00 p.ml, for a public hearing to consider historic designation for the following properties: Falling Creek Iron Works Bellwood Castlewood Magnolia Grange Ware Bottom Spring Swift Creek Mill Vawter Hall and Old President's House Olive Hill Eppington Vote: Unanimous 87-637 15.E. INTENT OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO HOLD EXECUTIVE SESSIONS On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, pursuant to Sections 2.1-344(a) (1) and 2.1-344(b), respectively, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Board of Supervisors will hold one or more Executive Sessions within 15 days of August 12, 1987, for the sole purpose of interviewing candi- dates for the position of chief administrative officer. (The Executive Session will be held at an undisclosed location at undisclosed times.) Vote: Unanimous 15.F. APPOINTMENTS 15.F.1. SOUTHSIDE VIRGINIA COMMUNITY HOUSING RESOURCE BOARD On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board nominated Ms. Jana D. Carter, Director of the Chesterfield County Housing Department, to serve on the Southside Virginia Community Housing Resource Board, whose formal appointment will be made on August 26, 1987. Vote: Unanimous 15.F.2. LOCAL EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEE Chief Eanes stated the Virginia Emergency Response Commission (VERC), appointed by the Governor in response to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), requested the County nominate possible appointees. He stated the VERC will appoint members to a local planning committee on August 17, 1987. On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board suspended its rules to provide for nomination and appointment simultaneously of appointees to serve on the local planning committee of VERC. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board nominated and appointed the following people to serve on the Virginia Emergency Response Commission (VERC) local planning committee, if selected by VERC: Mr. John G. "Chip" Dicks, III, House of Delegates; Mr. Ken Cochran, Virginia Power; Chief Joseph Pittman, Chief of Police, or his designee; Mr. N. Everette Carmichael, Commissioner of Revenue, Chesterfield County; Mr. Stanley Orchel, Jr., Commonwealth of VA., General Services Department Chemical Inventory Manager - President Bensley Rescue Squad; Mr. Jon R. Donnelly, Associate City Editor, Richmond News Leader; Ms. Bernie Simmons, Community Affairs Director, WWBT-TVl2; Mr. George F. Hoover, President, Hoover & Strong Inc., 10,700 Trade Road; Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson, 7710 Beach Road, Chesterfield, VA; 87-638 Mr. Eric Broughton, Safety Engineer, Allied Fibers, Chesterfield Plant; and Mr. Tom Reynolds, DuPont. Vote: Unanimous 15.G. CONSENT ITEMS 15.G.1. REQUESTS FOR BINGO/RAFFLE PERMITS Mr. Mayes disclosed to the Board that he is a member of the Tri-Cities Chapter, 555th Parachute Infantry Association, Inc., declared a potential conflict of interest, pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act, and stated he would not vote on this matter. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved requests for raffle permits for the following organi- zations for calendar year 1987: ORGANIZATION TYPE Virginia Deer Hunters Association, Inc. Raffle Tri-Cities Chapter, 555th Parachute Infantry Association, Inc. Raffle Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone. Abstention: Mr. Mayes. 15.G.2. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Fieldwood Road and Berrystone Road in Field- stone, Section 1, Matoaca District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, it is resolved that Fieldwood Road and Berrystone Road in Fieldstone, Section 1, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Fieldwood Road, beginning at the intersection with existing Lewis Road, State Route 632, and running south- westerly 0.24 mile to the intersection with Berrystone Road, then continuing southerly 0.19 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Berrystone Road, beginning at the intersection with Fieldwood Road and running westerly 0.01 mile to tie into proposed Berrystone Road, Fieldstone, Section 2. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 20 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Fieldstone is recorded as follows: Section 1. Plat Book 45, Pages 43 & 44, April 19, 1984. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with 87-639 directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Clovertree Court and Newstead Drive in Provi- dence Court, Sections 1 and 2, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, it is resolved that Clovertree Court and Newstead Drive in Providence Court, Sections 1 and 2, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Clovertree Court, beginning at the inter- section with Providence Road, State Route 678, and going easterly 0.18 mile to the intersection with Newstead Drive, then continuing easterly 0.14 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Newstead Drive, beginning at the intersection with Clovertree Court and going northerly 0.05 mile to tie into existing Newstead Drive, State Route 2128. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 115 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. These sections of Providence Court are recorded as follows: Section 1. Section 2. Plat Book 39, Pages 75 & 76r October 1, 1981. Plat Book 44, Pages 4 & 5, September 19, 1983. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his examination of Echo Ridge Drive, Echo Ridge Court and Echo Ridge Place in Echo Ridge, Section A, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, it is resolved that Echo Ridge Drive, Echo Ridge Court and Echo Ridge Place in Echo Ridge, Section A, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Echo Ridge Drive, beginning at the inter- section with existing Old Hundred Road, State Route 652, and going easterly 0.03 mile to the intersection with Echo Ridge Court, then continuing 0.10 mile to the intersection with Echo Ridge Place; Echo Ridge Court, beginning at the inter- section with Echo Ridge Drive and going northerly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; and Echo Ridge Place, beginning at the intersection with Echo Ridge Drive and going northerly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Again Echo Ridge Place, beginning at the intersection with Echo Ridge Drive and going southerly 0.08 mile to end in a temporary turnaround. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 32 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads except Echo Ridge Court which has a 40' right-of-way. 87-640 This section of Echo Ridge is recorded as follows: Section A. Plat Book 45, Page 15, February 22, 1984. Vote: Unanimous 15.G.3. REQUEST FOR ENTERTAINMENT/MUSICAL FESTIVAL PERMIT AND FIREWORKS PERMIT FROM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY FAIR ASSOC- IATION On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved the request for an entertainment/musical festival permit for the Chesterfield County Fair Association to conduct the annual County Fair at the Chesterfield County Fairgrounds from Sunday, September 13, 1987 to Saturday, September 19, 1987 and authorized permission for the staging of fireworks displays each night at approximately 10:00 p.m. from Monday, September 14, 1987 to Saturday, September 19, 1987, with the understand- ing that a fireworks liability insurance policy in the amount of $1,000,000 naming the County as an additional insured is provided and the request meets the applicable criteria under the Fire Prevention Code that conditions are not too dry to permit the displays. Vote: Unanimous 15.H. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS 15.H.1. ROUTE 36 GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County in 1984 formally declared their intention to address the safety hazard at the Chesterfield Avenue railroad grade crossing in Ettrick; and WHEREAS, the Board has appropriated over $2.5 million for the construction of a grade separation project at this loca- tion; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has programmed in their Six Year Improvement Plan funds for a grade separation project; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the grade separation project was conducted on July 30, 1987; and WHEREAS, citizens appearing at the hearing expressed support for a River Road to Chesterfield Avenue alternative. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board fully supports the River Road to Chesterfield Avenue alternative and requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to immed- iately proceed with its construction. Vote: Unanimous 15.H.2. APPROPRIATION AND AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR COMPLETION OF ROAD CONSTRUCTION IN POCOSHOCK HILLS SUBDIVISION On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved and authorized an appropriation in the amount of $23,740.30 from the Miscellaneous Drainage Capital Improvement account to supplement the Certificate of Deposit for the completion of the roads in Pocoshock Hills Subdivision; autho- rized the Acting County Administrator to enter into a contract with APAC-VA, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $20,315.30, for the completion of the road improvements in Pocoshock Hills 87-641 Subdivision; authorized the County Environmental Engineering drainage crew to complete the drainage work and bill the account in an amount not to exceed $8,425.00; and authorized the County Attorney's office to proceed with legal action to recoup the $23,740.30 appropriated from the Miscellaneous Drainage Capital Improvement Account. Vote: Unanimous 15.H.3. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved street light installation cost approvals at the following locations, with funds to be expended from the Clover Hill District Street Light Funds: Intersection of Arkay Drive and Wycliff Road ($396.00); and Intersection of Newbys Bridge Road and Sunnygrove Road ($569.00). And further, the Board deferred consideration of street light cost approvals for Dale Magisterial District at the inter- section of Falstone Road and Hopkins Road ($450.00), with instruction to staff that a letter be drafted to the President of the civic association explaining the situation and request- ing input from the property owners immediately adjacent to the proposed location of the installation. Vote: Unanimous 15.H.4. STREET LIGHT REQUESTS On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the installation of street lights at the following locations, with funds to be expended from the appropriate District Street Light Funds as indicated: CLOVER HILL 1. Intersection of Clovertree Court and Newstead Drive. DALE 2. 3. 4. 5. Intersection of Tyme Road and Monza Drive; Intersection of Monza Drive and Southmoor Road; Intersection of Falstone Road and Grassmere Road; Intersection of Drakeshire Road and Grassmere Road; and Intersection of Tyme Road and Bonnie Brae Road. Vote: Unanimous 15.H.5. REFERRAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING FENCE HEIGHTS TO PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Sale requested Board approval to refer to the Planning Commission an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would change front yard height restrictions to 4 feet, limit side yard fence heights to 7 feet (which is not addressed in the current ordinance), increase clear vision areas at inter- sections and establish clear vision areas at driveways. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board referred to the Planning Commission for public hearing an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance relating to fence heights. Vote: Unanimous 87-642 15.H.6. PROPOSED CROSSOVER ON ROUTE 10 EAST OF 1-95 Mr. Dodd stated the request for consideration of a crossover on Route 10 east of 1-95 was from a property owner to the south of Route 10; however, it is possible approval of the proposed crossover could have an impact on development north of Route 10. He requested that staff prepare a recommendation for a crossover that would accommodate orderly development and be fair to both sides of Route 10 with the realization that there is a motel under construction now, for which building permits have probably been issued, and they should not be delayed in any way. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board deferred consideration of the proposed crossover on Route 10 east of 1-95 until August 26, 1987, with the instruction that staff prepare a recommendation for a crossover that would be fair and accommodate orderly development on both sides of Route 10 and that the construction of and/or issuance of building permits for the proposed motel currently under construction not be delayed. Vote: Unanimous 15.H.7. HOPKINS ROAD STORM SEWER On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has provided the Vir- ginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) $98,500 for the reconstruction of Ruffin Mill Road; and WHEREAS, this reconstruction has now been completed; and WHEREAS, most of the right-of-way for this reconstruction was acquired through donations thus leaving a fund balance on the project; and WHEREAS, VDOT has requested the County to provide $60,000 for the installation of storm sewer on the Hopkins Road widen- ing project from Meadowdale Boulevard to Beulah Road; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to see the widening of Hopkins Road proceed as quickly as possible; and WHEREAS, the County enjoys an excellent working relation- ship with the VDOT Resident Engineer in Chesterfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board requests VDOT to transfer $60,000 from the Ruffin Mill Road project to the Hopkins Road widening project for storm sewer installation. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors enjoys an excellent working relationship with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Resident Engineer for Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, the County has made significant financial contri- butions to transportation improvements in Chesterfield; and WHEREAS, VDOT has a policy for participation in the cost of constructing sidewalks and storm sewers on secondary road projects; and 87-643 WHEREAS, VDOT's interpretation of the policy requires the County to contribute funds on a run off ratio basis for storm sewers whenever curb and gutter is desired; and WHEREAS, the use of curb and gutter on secondary road projects provides no direct benefit to the County but does benefit VDOT since most urban projects can be constructed at a lower cost with curb and gutter because less right-of-way is required thus minimizing the impact on adjoining properties; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has provided VDOT with funds for the storm sewer installation on the Hopkins Road widening project from Meadowdale Boulevard to Beulah Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Super- visors requests the Department of Transportation Commissioner to review VDOT's interpretation of the policy and to only request County participation in storm sewers whenever the use of curb and gutter is not the most economical method for VDOT to construct a secondary road. Vote: Unanimous 15.H.8. ROUTE 288 BID APPROVAL On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, on November 5, 1985, the citizens of Chesterfield County overwhelmingly approved a $30 million bond referendum for the construction of Route 288 from Route 360 to Route 10; and WHEREAS, the construction of Route 288 will improve the transportation network, promote economic development, and help preserve the quality of life in Chesterfield; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has assured the County that Route 288 will be constructed with an interchange at Route 10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Super- visors of Chesterfield County hereby approves the bid of $25,557,956.33 for the construction of Route 288 from Route 360 to approximately one half mile west of Route 10, including an interchange at Five Forks. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board requests VDOT to immediately proceed with the construction of Route 288. Vote: Unanimous 15.I. UTILITIES ITEMS 15.I.1. PUBLIC HEARINGS 15.I.l.a. TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO VACATE PORTIONS OF DRAIN- AGE AND UTILITIES EASEMENTS WITHIN AVON ESTATES SUBDIVISION Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate portions of drainage and utility easements within Avon Estates Subdivision. No one was present to speak in favor of or against the proposed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a portion of a 16 foot 87-644 drainage and utility easement within Lots 9 10 and 11 Avon Estates Subdivision, Clover Hill Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 9 at page 7. WHEREAS, Frank L. Hereford petitioned the Board of Super- visors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate a portion of a 16 foot drainage and utility easement within Lots 9, 10 and 11 Avon Estates Subdivision, Clover Hill Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 9, page 7, made by Phillip H. Brooks, Land Surveyor dated November 27, 1950. The drainage and utility easement petitioned to be vacated is more fully described as follows: A Portion of a 16 foot drainage and utility easement within Lots 9, 10 and 11, Avon Estates Subdivision the location of which is more fully shown, on a plat made by Michael P. Mozingo dated June 15, 1987, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance. WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1- 431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance of the portion of the drainage easement sought to be vacated. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of the drainage easement be and is hereby vacated. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This ordinance shall vest fee simple title of the portion of the drainage and utility ease- ment hereby vacated in the property owner of the lot within Avon Estates Subdivision free and clear of any rights of public use. Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names of the County of Chesterfield, as grantor, and Frank L. Here- ford and Beverly W. Hereford, or their successors in title, as grantee. Vote: Unanimous 15.I.l.b. TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE TO VACATE PORTION OF DRAIN- AGE EASEMENT WITHIN CHESTER SUBDIVISION Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to vacate a portion of a drainage easement within Chester Subdivision. No one was present to speak in favor of or against the proposed ordinance. 87-645 On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a portion of a 16 foot drainage easement within Lots 7, Block B, Section N, Chester Subdivision, Bermuda Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 15 at page 22. WHEREAS, Jim Daniels, agent for the owner petitioned the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate a portion of a 16 foot drainage easement within Lots 7, Block B, Section N, Chester Subdivision, Bermuda Magisterial Dis- trict, Chesterfield County, Virginia more particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 15, page 22, made by Foster and Miller, P.C. dated March 1, 1986. The drainage easement petitioned to be vacated is more fully described as follows: A Portion of a 16 foot drainage easement within Lot 7, Block B, Section N, Chester Subdivision the location of which is more fully shown, on a plat made by J. K. Timmons, Associates dated April 26, 1976, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance. WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1- 431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising; and WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance of the portion of the drainage easement sought to be vacated. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of the drainage easement be and is hereby vacated. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to Section 15.1-485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483 is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the portion of the plat vacated. This ordinance shall vest fee simple title of the portion of the drainage and utility ease- ment hereby vacated in the property owner of the lot within Chester Subdivision free and clear of any rights of public use. Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names of the County of Chesterfield, as grantor, and Robert M. Phillips and Henry H. Dodge, or their successors in title, as grantee. Vote: Unanimous 15.I.2. RIGHT-OF-WAY ITEMS 15.I.2.a. CONSIDER CONDEMNATION FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASE- MENTS FOR ROUTE 10 AND ROUTE 301 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board authorized the County Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings against the following property owners if the 87-646 amounts as set opposite their names is not accepted. And be it further resolved that the Acting County Administrator notify said property owners by registered mail on August 13, 1987, of the County's intention to enter upon and take the property which is to be the subject of said condemnation proceedings. This action is on an emergency basis and the County intends to exercise immediate right of entry pursuant to Section 15.1- 238.1 of the Code of Virginia. North Market Realty Corporation Rt.10/1 $180,885 East Coast Oil Corporation Rt.10/1 $ 22,287 Vote: Unanimous 15.I.2.b. REQUEST FROM C&P TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR EASEMENT TO RELOCATE BURIED CABLE ON COUNTY PROPERTY On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board to execute an agreement granting a 10' easement to C&P Telephone Company to relocate buried cable which serves the Chesterfield Airport, which relocation is necessary due to the expansion of an existing parking lot. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 15.I.2.c. REQUEST FROM MR. CLYDE O. LIPFORD TO CONSTRUCT PRIVATE DRIVE ON COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute any necessary documents for Mr. Clyde O. Lipford to clear and construct a private gravel drive from Beechnut Avenue to his property, within the right of way for Joe Avenue (unim- proved), contingent upon approval of a variance by the Board of Zoning Appeals to allow his son to build on this property. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 15.I.2.d. REQUEST FROM MR. DONALD M. GOLDEN TO ENCROACH ON COUNTY EASEMENT On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute any necessary documents for Mr. Donald M. Golden to construct a fireplace within an existing County Temporary Easement across Lot 11, Block B, Bon Air Forest Subdivision, Section A. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 15.I.2.e. REQUEST TO ASSIST MONARCH DEVELOPMENT IN ACQUIRING SEWER EASEMENT ALONG PROPOSED ALDERSMEADE ROAD Mr. Sale stated Monarch Development has requested assistance in acquiring an easement across property of John L., Jr. and Darlene J. Nichols for the extension of a sewer line to serve their property on proposed Aldersmead Road Extended. He stated on June 11, 1987, Monarch Development offered $200 to the owners but the offer was refused. Mr. Applegate expressed concern regarding easements that cross lots diagonally. Mr. Sale stated the sewer easement parallels an existing drainage easement and does not adversely affect obtaining a building permit. 87-647 On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approved and authorized the the Right of Way Manager to aid Monarch Development in acquiring an offsite sewer easement to serve their property along proposed Aldersmead Road Extended, provided they execute a contract with the County agreeing to pay for all the costs. Vote: Unanimous 15.I.2.f. REQUEST TO ASSIST QUEENSMILL CORPORATION IN ACQUIR- ING SEWER EASEMENT IN VICINITY OF HUGUENOT ROAD AND WOODMONT DRIVE On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved and authorized the Right of Way Manager to aid Queens- mill Corporation in acquiring the sewer easement across the property of Norvell Orgain Butler and John Barbour Orgain, III, located north of Huguenot Road and west of Woodmont Drive, provided the corporation executes a contract with the County agreeing to pay for all the costs. Vote: Unanimous 15.I.3. CONSENT ITEMS 15.I.3.a. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT W87-125M, IRONBRIDGE COLLEC- TOR~ PHASE I Mr. Dodd declared a potential conflict of interest, pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act, and stated he would not vote on this issue. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute any necessary documents for the following water con- tract: Ironbridge Collector, Phase I - W87-125M Developer: Ironbridge Development Company Contractor: McLane Construction Company Total Contract Cost: Total Estimated County Cost: (Refund through connection fees) Estimated Developer Cost: Number of Connections: Future Connections Code: 5B-2511-997 $306,793.50 $ 96,295.10 $210,498.40 Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone. Abstention: Mr. Dodd. 15.I.3.b. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT S87-116(9), PANO DRIVE IN KIMBERLY ACRES, SECTION 2 On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute any necessary documents for the following sewer con- tract: Pano Drive in Kimberly Acres, Section 2 - S87-116(9) Developer: Latane T. Jenkins Contractor: R.M.C. Contractors, Inc. Hawthorne Excavators, Inc. Total Contract Cost: Total Estimated County Cost: (Cash Refund) $4,010.00 $1,867.00 87-648 Estimated Developer Cost: Number of Connections: 3 Code: 5P-5724-8009 Vote: Unanimous $2,143.00 15.I.3.c. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG PERRYMONT ROAD AND JEFFER- SON DAVIS HIGHWAY On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 5' and 20' strip of land along Perrymont Road and Jefferson Davis Highway from Woodrow W. Waller, Jr. and Gertrude W. Waller. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous Mr. Dodd requested that staff provide him with an update regarding the status of a buffer required at the rear of the property located along Perrymont Road. 15.I.3.d. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG BEACH ROAD On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 30' strip of land along Beach Road from Sovran Bank, N.A. and Zoe Powell Lane, Co- Executors of the Estate of Kenneth P. Lane. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 15.I.3.e. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG TURNER ROAD On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 20' strip of land along Turner Road from the Trustees of Full Gospel Tabernacle. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 15.I.3.f. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG SECOND BRANCH ROAD On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board approved and authorized the Acting County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 10' strip of land along Second Branch Road from Zane G. Davis and Carmen G. Davis. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 15.I.4. REPORTS Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report on the developer water and sewer contracts executed by the Acting County Admin- istrator. 15.J. REPORTS Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a status report on the General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road 87-649 Reserve Funds, District Road and Street Light Funds, Lease Purchases, School Literary Loans and Animal Control. Mr. Ramsey stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following streets into the State Secondary Road System: ADDITIONS LENGTH NASH GROVE - SECTION A Route 3306 (Buttevant Drive) - From Route 636 to 0.28 mile west of Route 3307 0.37 mi. Route 3307 (Wellesley Drive) - From 0.06 mile north of Route 3306 to a south cul-de-sac 0.12 mi. CHIPCHASE - SECTIONS A & B Route 3280 (Eagle Point Road) - From 0.03 mile north of Route 1588 to Route 3537 Route 3530 (Mineola Drive) - From Route 3532 to Route 3537 Route 3536 (Chagford Drive) - From Route 3280 to 0.03 mile west of Route 3280 Route 3537 (Crofton Road) - From Route 3280 to 0.01 mile north of Route 3538 Route 3538 (Drayton Road) - From Route 3537 to Route 3534 Route 3534 (Surry Road) - From 0.04 mile east of Route 3535 to 0.03 mile east of Route 3538 0.19 mi. 0.04 mi. 0.03 mi. 0.10 0.30 0.07 mm. HORNERS PLAN SUBDIVISION Route 3584 (Harley Drive) - From Route 653 to a southeast cul-de-sac 0.07 mi. PENNWOOD - SECTION 5 Route 3164 (Brickhaven Drive) - From Route 2181 to a north cul-de-sac 0.16 mi. THE BOULDERS SUBDIVISION Route 3430 (Chinaberry Boulevard) - From Route 60 to 0.22 mile northwest of Route 3433 Route 3431 (Boulder Springs Road) - From Route 3430 to 0.03 mile west of Route 3430 Route 3432 (Boulder Springs Drive) - From Route 3430 to 0.15 mile northwest of Route 3430 Route 3433 (Boulder Lake Drive) - From Route 3430 to 0.07 mile northwest of Route 3430 1.04 mi. 0.03 mi. 0.15 mi. 0.07 mi. NEWBYS' WOOD - SECTION A Route 3685 (Newbys' Wood Trail) - From Route 743 to 0.02 mile north of Route 3686 Route 3686 (Quails Ridge Road) - From 0.10 mile east of Route 3685 to 0.10 mile west of Route 3687 Route 3687 (Quails Ridge Terrace) - From Route 3686 to a southwest cul-de-sac 0.12 mi. 0.29 mi. 0.16 mi. 87-650 16. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board adjour- ned at 10:10 p.m. until 9:00 a.m. on August 26, 1987. Vote: Unanimous ~fahe Ramsey Acting County Administrator h~a~r~' G~ D~n~--e 1 ~ Chairmah 87-651