09-09-1987 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS
MINln~S
September 9, 1987
Supervisors in Attendance:
Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman
Mr. Jesse J. Mayes, Vice Chairman
Mr. G. H. Applegate
Mr. R. Garland Dodd
Mrs. Joan Girone
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
Staff in Attendance:
Mrs. Doris DeHart,
Legislative Coord.
Ms.~Joan Dolezal,
Clerk to the Board
Chief Robert Eanes,
Fire Department
Mr. Bradford S. Hammer,
Asst. Co. Admin.
Mr. William Howell,
Dir., Gen. Services
Mr. Robert Masden,
Asst. Co. Admin. for
Human Services
Mr. R. J. McCracken,
Transp. Director
Mr. Richard McElfish,
Dir. of Env. Eng.
Mr. Steve Micas, Co.
Attorney
Mrs. Pauline Mitchell,
Dir. of News/Info.
Services
Col. Joseph Pittman,
Chief of Police
Mr. Richard Sale, Asst.
Co. Admin. for
Development
Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr.,
Dir. of Parks & Rec.
Mr. David Welchons,
Dir. of Utilities
Mr. Frederick Willis,
Dir. of Human
Resource Management
Mr. Daniel called the meeting to order in the Administration
Building Conference Room (Room 502) at 2:15 p.m. (EDST).
1. WORK SESSION - WATER EXTENSION POLICY/NEN SUBDIVISIONS
Mr. Ramsey stated the purpose of the work session was to
provide the Board with information regarding the extension of
public water to new subdivisions.
Mr. Sale explained that recent problems with well failures
experienced throughout areas of the County brought this issue
to the forefront for consideration. He explained further that
staff also considered policy formulation for the extension of
public sewer service but does not consider the lack of public
sewer service to be a problem now that the County requires two
septic field sites per lot in new subdivisions.
Mr. Welchons presented a brief overview of the proposed policy
for extension of public water to new subdivisions, the cri-
teria, etc.
Discussion and questions ensued regarding the recommended
policy; the criteria for requiring use of public water versus
use of well systems; the depth requirement for drainfield
systems; State Health Department requirements as they relate to
sewer/water service installation; the cost of public water
87-690
versus the cost of installing well and septic systems; the
Board's prerogative for denying zoning requests that do not
meet the criteria set forth, the initiation of a mechanism to
make "developer expense" more equitable; the development of a
funding plan to finance the extension of public water and/or
sewer; the County's responsibility to ensure the health, safety
and welfare of County residents; etc.
The Board generally agreed that public water shall be provided
in all proposed subdivisions to protect and ensure the continu-
ed health, safety and general welfare of County residents; that
the burden of expense for public water and/or sewer should be
borne by the new growth in the County which is the new home-
owner/developer; to authorize the forwarding of a subdivision
ordinance amendment to the Planning Commission regarding the
extension of public water to new subdivisions for deliberation
and to set the date of November 12, 1987, for a public hearing
for the Board's consideration of the Planning Commission's
recommendation on this matter; and that input from members of
the development community and homebuilders' association be
requested in this matter.
The Board requested staff identify and provide them with
maps/information regarding geological areas within the County
that will not handle well and/or septic tank/drainfield
systems.
2. EXECUTIVE SESSION
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board went
into Executive Session to discuss personnel matters, legal
matters pertaining to the Human Services Building and the
acquisition of real property for public purposes, pursuant to
Sections 2.1-344(a) (1), (6) and (2), respectively, of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
Vote: Unanimous
Reconvening:
3. DINNER
The Board recessed to travel to the Diamond Head Restaurant for
dinner.
Reconvening:
4. INVOCATION
Mr. Daniel introduced
invocation.
Chief Robert Eanes who gave the
5. pT.F. DGE OF ~T.T.RGIAI~CE TO THE FLAG OF THE ~NITED STATES OF
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of
America was recited.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
6.A. AUGUST 26, 1987
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved the minutes of August 26, 1987, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
87-691
6.B. SEPTEMBER 2, 1987
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv-
ed the minutes of September 2, 1987, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
6.C. SEPTEMBER 3~ 1987
Mr. Daniel noted that Mr. Dodd was not present at the September
3, 1987 Board meeting when Mr. Ramsey was appointed County
Administrator; however, he has provided a signed document
indicating his total support of this appointment which paper is
filed with the papers of this Board.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the minutes of September 3, 1987, as submitted.
Vote: Unanimous
7. COOl/TY ADMI1/ISTRATOII'S CO~//ENT$
Mr. Daniel formally introduced Mr. Ramsey, newly appointed
County Administrator, and wished him success as he assumed the
full responsibilities and duties of that office. Mr. Ramsey
expressed his appreciation to the Board for their confidence
and the opportunity to serve the County in this capacity. In
recognition of the responsibilities/challenges of the office of
the County Administrator, he committed to the Board that he and
his staff will meet those challenges and guide the County
through the upcoming years to the best of their ability.
Mr. Ramsey introduced Mr. Keith Arnold, Director of the Metro-
politan Richmond Convention and Visitors' Bureau, who presented
a brief overview of the Bureau's current operation and its
established direction for the future for marketing tourism in
the Metropolitan Richmond area. He stated the Metropolitan
Area is progressive and has tremendous potential and the Bureau
is in the process of updating and enhancing its operation to
better facilitate marketing for the entire community. He
expressed appreciation for the Board's continued support and
stated the Bureau looks forward to working and communicating
with the Board in future endeavors. When asked, Mr. Arnold
indicated the Bureau's main offices will be located at 300 West
Main Street and the Visitor's Center will remain in operation
at its present location until the new Visitor's Center is
determined. He indicated the Bureau has booked a series of
three 12,000-person and one potential 40,000-person conventions
within the next two years.
Chief Eanes reported the James River is expected to crest at
approximately 12 Noon on September 10, 1987, at the City Locks,
with an anticipated crest of approximately 19-20 feet. He
stated it appears the impact of flooding expected in the
Metropolitan Area, specifically on the James River in Chester-
field County, is less than the flooding experienced in April,
1987. He stated, however, notifications and precautions were
initiated early to residential/commercial property owners in
the low-lying areas of the James River. He stated an ongoing
floodwatch is underway.
8. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mr. Mayes reported he attended the "Children Need a Brake -
Stop for the School Buses" news conference at the State Fair-
grounds on August 31, 1987, which program was organized to
87-692
prevent needless tragedies each year as children are entering
and leaving school buses and is sponsored by the police depart-
ments, governments, school divisions and businesses of Henrico,
Chesterfield, Richmond, Hanover, Goochland, New Kent, Charles
City, Powhatan and Ashland.
e
REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR
CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
added Item 14.E.4.k., Consideration of a Request for Public
Water in a Portion of Glebe Point; and adopted the agenda, as
amended.
Vote: Unanimous
It was noted revised information was distributed to the Board
on Items 14.B.4., Dell Drive Storm Sewer System, and 14.E.2.,~
Authorization to Forward Subdivision Ordinance Amendment to the
Planning Commission.
RESOLUTIONS OF SPECIAL RECOGNITION
PRESENTATION BY MR. WALTON HADEN, PRESIDENT OF DALE RURITAN
CLUB
Mr. Daniel introduced Mr. Walton Haden, President of the Dale
Ruritan Club, who stated in July, 1987, the Board approved an
agreement permitting the Dale Ruritan Club to reproduce and
market, for a two year period, the official Chesterfield County
flag, as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Mr. Haden
expressed appreciation, on behalf of the Dale Ruritan Club, for
the opportunity to have participated in this endeavor and
presented the Board with a flag from the first order.
Approximately ten (10) members of the Club were present. Mr.
Daniel accepted the flag, on behalf of the Board, and presented
it to Mr. Ramsey for appropriate display.
11. BEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSC~RDULRD MATTERS OR CLAIMS
o MRS. NANCY BURNETT AND OTHERS - REGARDING RENTAL OF SCHOOL
BUILDINGS TO Y.M.C.A.
Mrs. Jackie Coleman, representing approximately 42 private
child care centers in the County, stated the consortium of Day
Care Centers feels the recent action of the School Board in
allowing rental of the school facilities to the Y.M.C.A. for
before and after school child care is direct, unfair competi-
tion with their businesses. There were several members of the
day care center industry present. She stated no notice was
given to private businesses so they could become a part of such
a program and no advertisement was made of the contracts to be
awarded. She stated owners of County day care centers feel
that a program for underprivileged, latch-key children should
be promoted and they would welcome the opportunity to bid on
such a program; however, permitting the Y.M.C.A. to lease
school facilities for such a program, without strict controls,
is in direct competition with and detrimental to their pro-
grams. She stated there are ongoing committee discussions/ef-
forts with the Chesterfield County Department of Mental Health
and Preventive Services toward piloting a special program for
economically disadvantaged children. She stated the day care
center owners are asking for strict controls, an in-depth
evaluation of the program and that a determination be made as
to what percentage of this program's enrollment would be
actually be disadvantaged children, as they feel the bulk of
Y.M.C.A. enrollment would be children who could use their day
care center programs.
87-693
Mr. Daniel stated it is not the policy of the Board to respond
to citizens' comments; however, he felt it would be appropriate
to suspend the rules to permit individual Board comment on this
matter.
Mr. Applegate raised points of concerns regarding business
licenses to operate the program, proper insurance, property
damage, cost of rental of the buildings and the lack of a bid
system for the program. He stated, although he is a supporter
of the Y.M.C.A., he felt the School Board should have consulted
the Board of Supervisors prior to the implementation of this
program. He suggested that the Board of Supervisors advise the
Y.M.C.A. that this Board was not consulted with respect to
implementation of this program and did not endorse it, as the
School Board should have discussed the matter with the Board of
Supervisors prior to entering into an agreement with the
Y .M .C .A.
Mr. Daniel stated the Board of Supervisors and School Board had
made a joint decision, which transpired after considerable
public discussion at an earlier date, not to use the school
facilities for after-school day care centers and he felt this
information, as well as the fact that this proposal was origi-
nated without a formal Request for Proposals should be
included.
Mr. Dodd concurred with Mr. Applegate's and Mr. Daniel's
statements and seconded the motion. He stated neither he nor
the School Board representative from the Bermuda District
requested or endorsed this program. He expressed concern that
this is a bad policy for the County which will increase expen-
ses and generate a significant deficit for the next three years
which the Board will have to address/resolve.
Mrs. Girone stated she is currently a member of the Y.M.C.A.
Board of Directors; however, she was neither a member at the
time this action transpired nor was she involved in its imple-
mentation.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board of
Supervisors formally directed the Chairman of the Board to
advise the School Board and the Y.M.C.A. that it does not
endorse the program of renting school facilities to the
Y.M.C.A. for before and after school child care, because of
system concerns regarding the Request for Proposals, insurance,
property damage, cost of rental, etc.; and the Board of
Supervisors does not understand why this action was taken in
view of the joint agreement not to use the schools for after
school day care programs.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mr. Dodd.
Abstention: Mrs. Girone, as she wished to discuss the matter
with the Y.M.C.A.
Mr. Daniel requested the Clerk research the records for the
information relative to the joint agreement.
It was generally agreed to recess for several minutes.
Reconvening:
12. DEFERRED ITEMS
12.A. APPOINTMENTS
12.A.1. YOUTH SERVICES COMMISSION
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
nominated Ms. Kim Pearson to serve as the youth representative
from the Clover Hill District on the Youth Services Commission,
whose formal appointment will be made on September 23, 1987.
Vote: Unanimous
87-694
12.A.2. ECONOMIC ADVISORY COUNCIL
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
appointed Dr. Samuel L. Hancock as the ninth citizen represen-
tative to the Economic Advisory Council, whose term is effec-
tively immediately and is at the pleasure of the Board.
Vote: Unanimous
12.B. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVAL
Mr. Daniel noted receipt of a letter from Mr. Joseph Biggs,
President of the Meadowbrook Civic Association, supporting a
street light installation at the proposed location of Falstone
Road and Hopkins Road.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved the street light installation cost approval for the
intersection of Falstone Road and Hopkins Road ($450.00), with
funds to be expended from the Dale District Street Light Funds.
Vote: Unanimous
13. PUBLIC ~R. ARINGS
13.A. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATIONS FOR FALLING CREEK IRON
WORKS~ BELLWOOD, CASTLEWOOD, MAGNOLIA GRANGE~ WARE
BOTTOM SPRING, SWIFT CREEK MILL, VAWTER HALL AND OLD
PRESIDENT'S HOUSE, OLIVE HILL AND EPPINGTON
FALLING CREEK IRON WORKS
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for
Falling Creek Iron Works. He stated the Planning Commission
and Preservation Committee have both recommended approval.
Mr. Lyle Browning, representing the Archaeological Society of
Virginia, stated the Falling Creek Iron Works was the first
iron works blast furnace operated in North America, presently
is the only remaining one of its kind in existence and voiced
support for approval of the site for County historic landmark
designation.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv-
ed historic landmark designation for Falling Creek Iron Works--
described as follows:
Falling Creek Iron Works - Falling Creek on the north,
Seaboard Coastline Railroad on the east, 100 feet south of
roadway through the site on the south, to a point 450 feet west
of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad and directly north to
Falling Creek.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd stated he hoped the Historical Society would be able,
at some future time, to acquire funding for restoration of this
site.
BELLWOOD
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for
Bellwood. He stated the Planning Commission and Preservation
Committee have both recommended approval.
No one came forward to address this matter.
87-695
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved historic landmark designation for Bellwood--described
as follows:
Bellwood - The building and immediate grounds to be more or
less defined as 100 feet to the east, and 50 feet to the north,
south and west of the structure.
Vote: Unanimous
CASTLEWOOD
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for
Castlewood. He stated the Planning Commission and Preservation
Committee have both recommended approval.
No one came forward to address this matter.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board approv-
ed historic landmark designation for Castlewood--described as
follows:
Castlewood - 10201 Iron Bridge Road, (Tax Map 95-8(1), Parcel
19, Sheet 31), 5.88 acres.
Vote: Unanimous
MAGNOLIA GRANGE
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for
Magnolia Grange. He stated the Planning Commission and
Preservation Committee have both recommended approval.
Mr. Lyle Browning, representing the Archaeological Society of
Virginia, voiced support for approval of this, as well as the
remaining buildings, for landmark designations and stated the
grounds surrounding these buildings are equally as important
and historically significant and should be considered in any
planning venture associated with these sites, as they yield
invaluable archaeological resources.
There was no opposition present.
On motion of the Board, it was resolved to approve historic
landmark designation for Magnolia Grange--described as follows:
Magnolia Grange - 10020 Iron Bridge Road, Tax Map 95-8(1),
Parcel 42, Sheet 31.
Vote: Unanimous
The Board commended the Historical Society for its management
of Magnolia Grange.
WARE BOTTOM SPRING
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for
Ware Bottom Spring. He stated the Planning Commission and
Preservation Committee have both recommended approval..
No one came forward to address this matter.
There was no opposition present.
87-696
Mr. Dodd stated the Ware Bottom Spring site is abundantly
historic and he hoped, at some future time, funding could be
acquired for the restoration and protection of this site.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv-
ed historic landmark designation for Ware Bottom
Spring--described as follows:
Ware Bottom Spring - North of Ware Bottom Spring Road, east of
Ramblewood Road, (west 100 feet of Parcel 20, Sheet 33, Tax Map
117-9(1) .
Vote: Unanimous
SWIFT CREEK MILL
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for
Swift Creek Mill. He stated the Planning Commission and
Preservation Committee have both recommended approval.
No one came forward to address this matter.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Mayes stated this site is an outstanding cultural site and
recommended approval of its historic designation.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved historic landmark designation for Swift Creek Mill--
described as follows:
Swift Creek Mill (Swift Creek Playhouse) - Tax Map 163-11 (1),
Parcel 5, Sheet 49.
Vote: Unanimous
VAWTER HALL AND OLD PRESIDENT'S HOUSE
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider approval of landmark designation for
Vawter Hall and Old President's House. He stated the Planning
Commission and Preservation Committee have both recommended
approval.
No one came forward to address this matter.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Mayes stated that he is closely associated with this
particular site and its history and recommended approval of its
historic designation.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved historic landmark designation for Vawter Hall and Old
President's House--described as follows:
Vawter Hall and Old President's House - 3 acres beginning at a
point 1100 feet north of the Appomattox River, 3700 feet south
east of Routes 36 and 1107, 250 feet east northeast along the
south side of Hayden Street to an intersection with College
Avenue, north 650 feet to point of origin.
Vote: Unanimous
OLIVE HILL
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for
Olive Hill; however, the Planning Commission and Preservation
Committee do not recommend approval because the owner does not
want his property designated historic.
87-697
No one came forward to address this matter.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Dodd stated he hoped the owner would reconsider historic
designation for this site at some future time as Olive Hill is
listed on the National Register and he felt its history should
be recognized and preserved.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board denied
historic landmark designation for Olive Hill which is the
desire of the property owner.
Vote: Unanimous
EPPINGTON
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for
Eppington. He stated the Planning Commission and Preservation
Committee have both recommended approval.
No one came forward to address this matter.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Mayes stated this site is a distinguished building of
tremendous architectural quality and historic interest and
recommended approval of its historic designation.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved historic landmark designation for Eppington--described
as follows:
Eppington - 14600 Eppes Falls Road, Tax Map 154(1), Parcel 1.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel stated he had received a letter from Brown-Boveri
Power Equipment, Inc. regarding their position on potential
consideration for historic landmark designation for "Richmond
View" and asked that the letter be filed for future reference.
13.B. SALE OF PROPERTY AT THE AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK
13.B.1. YOUNG MOVING AND STORAGE, INC.
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider the conveyance of a parcel in the
Airport Industrial Park to Young Moving & Storage, Inc.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents conveying a 4 + acre parcel fronting
Whitepine Road, approximately 1,850 fe~t from the intersection
of Whitepine Road and Reycan Road, at the Airport Industrial
Park to Young Moving & Storage, Inc. at $37,500 per acre. (A
copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
13.B.2. VIVIAN E. AND PAULINE G. PACE
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider the conveyance of a parcel in the
Airport Industrial Park to Mr. Vivian E. Pace and Ms. Pauline
G. Pace.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter.
87-698
When asked, Mr. Sale stated the planning staff, which reviews
the site plans for these requests, is aware of the Board's
desire for improved quality of construction and site prepara-
tion in the Airport Industrial Park.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents conveying a 7.6 + acre parcel on Whitepine
Road, adjacent to the Norwegian Incubator project, at the
Airport Industrial Park to Mr. Vivian E. Pace and Ms. Pauline
G. Pace at $38,000 per acre. (A copy of the plat is filed with
the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
13.B.3. TERRY T. FIELDS
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider the conveyance of a parcel in the
Airport Industrial Park to Mr. Terry T. Fields.
No one came forWard to speak in favor of or against the matter.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents conveying a 4 + acre parcel on Whitepine
Road, adjacent to Reynolds Metals and a future road in Phase II
of the Park, at the Airport Industrial Park to Mr. Terry T.
Fields at $38,000 per acre. (A copy of the plat is filed with
the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
13.B.4. BILL LINDSEY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider the conveyance of a parcel in the
Airport Industrial Park to Bill Lindsey Investment Properties.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv-
ed and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents conveying a 2.1 + acre parcel at the end of
White Bark Terrace, west of the Strahan Ink & Lacquer Corpora-
tion, at the Airport Industrial Park to Bill Lindsey Investment
Properties at $38,000 per acre. (A copy of the plat is filed
with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Applegate stated he felt the existing sale price of
property in the Industrial Park is under the current market
rate in comparison to other prevailing market rates and should
be reevaluated with consideration given to price per square
foot. Mr. Dodd stated approval of multiple sales during the
course of one meeting was indicative that the property is being
sold too cheap.
It was generally agreed that staff review the selling price
policy for property at the Airport Industrial Park and bring
back to the Board recommendations for the most prevailing
market rates.
13.C. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD RELATING TO R-88 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the County
Code, relating to the establishment of Residential (R-88)
District classifications.
87-699
Mr. Jerry Journigan, representing residents in the southern
portion of the County, voiced support for adoption of the
Residential (R-88) District classification. When asked,
several citizens stood to indicate their support of the
proposed ordinance.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Dodd inquired if approval of the proposed ordinance would
affect an individual property owner's ability to deed land to
his children or adversely impact the extension of utilities
into the Matoaca District in the future. Mr. Sale stated it
would not affect a property owner's ability to give land to
immediate family members. Mr. Mayes stated approval of the
R-88 classification provides a mechanism whereby those
interested in development in the southern portion of the County
make certain that such development will be quality. Mr.
Applegate noted providing water and sewer facilities for a
development with 2 acre lots will be extremely expensive and
will require quality development. Mr. Mayes stated approval of
the proposed ordinance is not intended to curb development but
to ensure quality.
On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1978, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 21-9, 21-21, 21-38,
21-78, 21-79, 21-80, 21-81, 21-83, 21-84, 21-85, 21-86, 21-88,
21-89, 21-90, 21-91, 21-93, 21-94, 21-95, 21-96, 21-98, 21-99,
21-10, 21-101, 21-103, 21-104, 21-105, 21-106, 21-115, 21-132,
21-133, 21-134, 21-135, 21-148, 21-149, 21-153, 21-154, 21-155,
21-156 AND ENACTING ARTICLE III.A., SECTIONS 21-77.16 THROUGH
21-77.20, RELATING TO R-88 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Section 21-9 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as
follows:
Sec. 21-9. Fees for hearinqs.
(a) Zoning:
(2)
Residential (R-88, R-40, R-25, R-15, R-12,
R-9, R-7, MH-1, MH-2) . . . $475.00
plus $ 20.00 per acre
ooo
(2) That Section 21-21 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as
follows:
Sec. 21-21. Districts enumerated.
For the purpose of this chapter the unincorporated terri-
tory of the County is hereby into districts as follows:
R-88 One Family Residential District
R-40 One Family Residential District
ooo
/
Residence or residential~istricts, hereafter referred to as R
Districts include the R~8, R-40, R-25, R-15, R-12, R-9, R-7,
MH-1, and MH-2 Distr~ts. Townhouse residential districts
include the R-TH Distr~ts. Residential Multifamily districts
include the R-MF Districts. Business districts, hereafter
referred to as B Distr~cts, include the O, B-l, B-2, B-3, and
B-T Districts. Industr%al districts, hereafter referred to as
87-700
M Districts, include the M-i, M-2, and M-3 Districts. Agricul-
tural Districts include the A District.
OOO
(3) That Section 21-38 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as
follows:
Sec. 21-38. Generally.
The maximum height of all buildings within the districts
enumerated below shall be as follows except for the provisions
of Section 21-40 below:
(a) R-88, R-40, R-25, R-15, R-12, R-9, R-7, MH-1, MH-2,
R-TH, and R-MF.
OOO
(4) That Sections 21-78 through 21-82 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and re-
enacted as follows:
Sec. 21-78. Permitted uses--By right.
The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-40
District: Those uses permitted by right in the R-88 District.
Sec. 21-79. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the
R-40 District: Those accessory uses permitted in the R-88
District.
Sec. 21-80. Same--Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed by conditional use
subject to the provisions of Section 21-34: Those conditional
uses permitted in the R-88 District.
Sec. 21-81. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be allowed by special exception,
subject to the provisions of Section 21-15: Those uses permit-
ted as special exception in the R-88 District.
OOO
(5) That Sections 21-83 through 86 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and re-
enacted as follows:
Sec. 21-83. Permitted uses--By right.
The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-25
District: Those uses permitted by right in the R-88 District.
(11-27-72, Section 5-1.)
Sec. 21-84. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the
R-25 District: Those accessory uses permitted in the R-88
District. (11-27-72, Section 5-2.)
Sec. 21-85. Same--Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses in
the R-25 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-34:
Those conditional uses permitted in the R-88 District. (11-27-
72, Section 5-3.)
87-701
Sec. 21-86. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be permitted as special exceptions
in the R-25 District subject to the provisions of Section
21-15: Those uses permitted as special exceptions in the R-88
District. (11-27-72, Section 5-4.)
OOO
(6) That Sections 21-88 through 21-92 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and re-
enacted as follows:
Sec. 21-88. Permitted uses--By right.
The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-15
District: Those uses permitted by right in the R-88 District.
(11-27-72, Section 6-1.)
Sec. 21-89. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the
R-15 District: Those accessory uses permitted in the R-88
District. (11-27-72, Section 6-2.)
Sec. 21-90. Same--Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses in
the R-15 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-34:
Those conditional uses permitted in the R-88 District. (11-27-
72, Section 6-3.)
Sec. 21-91. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be permitted as special exceptions
in the R-15 District subject to the provisions of Section
21-15: Those uses permitted as special exceptions in the R-88
District. (11-27-72, Section 6-4.)
OOO
(7) That Sections 21-93 through 21-96 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and re-
enacted as follows:
Sec. 21-93. Permitted uses--By right.
The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-12
District: Those uses permitted by right in the R-88 District.
(11-27-72, Section 7-1.)
Sec. 21-94. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the
R-12 District: Those accessory uses permitted in the R-88
District. (11-27-72, Section 7-2.)
Sec. 21-95. Same--Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses in
the R-12 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-34:
Those conditional uses permitted in the R-88 District. (11-27-
72, Section 7-3.)
Sec. 21-96. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be permitted as special exceptions
in the R-12 District subject to the provisions of Section
21-15: Those uses permitted as special exceptions in the R-88
District. (11-27-72, Section 7-4.)
OOO
87-702
(8) That Sections 21-98 through 21-101 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and re-
enacted as follows:
Sec. 21-98. Permitted uses--By right.
The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-9
District: Those uses permitted by right in the R-88 District.
(11-27-72, Section 8-1.)
Sec. 21-99. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the R-9
District: Those accessory uses permitted in the R-88 District.
(11-27-72, Section 8-2.)
Sec. 21-100. Same--Conditional Uses.
The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses in
the R-9 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-34:
Those conditional uses permitted in the R-88 District. (11-27-
72, Section 8-3.)
Sec. 21-101. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be permitted as special exceptions
in the R-9 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-15:
Those uses permitted as special exceptions in the R-88 Dis-
trict. (11-27-72, Section 8-4.)
ooo
(9) That Sections 21-103 through 21-106 of the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and
reenacted as follows:
Sec. 21-103. Permitted uses--By right.
The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-7
District: Those uses permitted by right in the R-88 District.
(11-27-72, Section 9-1.)
Sec. 21-104. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the R-7
District: Those accessory uses permitted in the R-88 District.
(11-27-72, Section 9-2.)
Sec. 21-105. Same--Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses in
the R-7 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-34:
Those conditional uses permitted in the R-88 District. (11-27-
72, Section 9-3.)
Sec. 21-106. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be permitted as special exceptions
in the R-7 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-15:
Those uses permitted as special exceptions in the R-88 Dis-
trict. (11-27-72, Section 9-4; 1-23-74.)
ooo
(10) That Section 21-115 of the Code of the County of
Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and reenacted as
follows:
Sec. 21-115. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the
MH-1 District:
87-703
(a) Any accessory uses permitted in the R-88 District.
ooo
(11) That Sections 21-132 through 21-135 of the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and
reenacted as follows:
Sec. 21-132. Permitted uses--By right.
The following uses shall be permitted by right in the MH-2
District:
(a) Those uses permitted by right in the R-88 District,
except single family dwellings.
(b) Mobile home subdivisions.
1-23-74.)
(11-27-72, Section 14-1;
Sec. 21-133. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the
MH-2 District:
Those accessory uses permitted in the R-88 District. (11-27-
72, Section 14-2; 1-23-74.)
Sec. 21-134. Same--Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses in
the MH-2 District subject to the provisions of Section 21-34:
Those conditional uses permitted in the R-88 District. (11-27-
72, Section 14-3; 1-23-74.)
Sec. 21-135. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be permitted as special exceptions
in the MH-2 District subject to the provisions of Section
21-15: Those uses permitted as special exceptions in the R-88
District. (11-27-72, Section 14-4; 1-23-74.)
ooo
(12) That Sections 21-148 and 21-149 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and re-
enacted as follows:
Sec. 21-148. Permitted uses-By right.
Within any 0 District, no building, structures or premises
shall be used, arranged, or designed to be used in any part
except for one or more of the following uses:
(a) Any permitted uses as regulated in the R-88 District,
except dwellings.
Sec. 21-149. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the 0
District:
(a) Same as Section 21-77.17(e).
ooo
(13) That Section 21-153 through 21-156 of the Code of the
County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended is amended and re-
enacted as follows:
Sec. 21-153. Permitted uses--By right.
Within any B-1 District, no building, structure, or
premises shall be used or arranged or designed to be used in
any part except for one or more of the following uses:
87-704
(1) Any permitted use as regulated in the R-88 District
and Office Business District except dwellings; provided, that
any dwellings legally existing in this district on January 1,
1973 or at the time of any amendment hereto shall not be
subject to the restrictions or nonconforming uses contained
herein. (1/23/74)
ooo
Sec. 21-154. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the B-1
District:
(a)
District,
(1/23/74)
Accessory uses allowed and as regulated in the R-88
unless previously allowed in Section 21-153.
(b) Other accessory uses, not otherwise prohibited,
customarily accessory and incidental to any permitted use.
(c) Signs as regulated in division 7 of article III.
(d) One dwelling unit for an owner or operator of the
business being conducted on the premises. (11-27-72, Section
17-2; 1-23-74.)
Sec. 21-155. Same--Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed by conditional use in
the B-1 district, subject to the provisions of Section 21-34:
(a) Any conditional use as allowed in the R-88 District,
unless previously allowed in Section 21-153.
(b) Jails, prisons, road camps.
(c) Commercial parking lot.
(d) Kennels, private.
(e) Kennels, commercial.
1-23-74; 3-14-79; 4-25-79.)
(11-27-72,
Section 17-3;
(f) Pet Grooming Shop. (7-27-83)
(g) Veterinary clinic. (7-27-83)
Sec. 21-156. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be allowed by special exception in
the B-1 District, subject to the provisions of Section 21-15:
Any special exception allowed in the R-88 District except
kennels, unless previously allowed in Section 21-153.
(1/23/74) (11-27-72, Section 17-4; 1-23-74.)
ooo
(14) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, be amended by enacting Article III.A., Sections
21-77.16 through 21-77.20 as follows:
Article III.A. R-88. Residential District.
Sec. 21-77.16. Permitted uses--By right.
The following uses shall be permitted by right in the R-88
District:
(a) Single-family dwellings.
87-705
(b) Churches and other places of worship, including
parish houses, Sunday Schools and temporary revival tents
(revival tents subject to obtaining written permission from
both the police department and health department).
(c) Public schools, colleges, libraries and museums.
(d) Publicly operated parks, playgrounds and athletic
fields, including buildings and facilities customarily appurte-
nant thereto. Public and private forests, wildlife preserves
and conservation areas.
(e) Propagation and cultivation of crops, flowers, trees,
and shrubs which are not offered for sale.
(f) Group care facilities.
Sec. 21-77.17. Same--Accessory uses.
The following accessory uses shall be permitted in the
R-88 District:
(a) Private garages, garden, tool and storage buildings,
boat houses, piers and docks.
(b) Home occupations.
(c) Tennis courts and similar recreation facilities.
(d) Swimming pools and adjoining deck areas; provided,
that they are entirely enclosed with a security type fence or
wall not less than four feet in height; and provided, that no
swimming pool wall shall be located within six feet of an
adjacent lot in an R District (nor in a required front or
corner side yard).
(e) Temporary buildings or trailers devoted to purposes
incidental to construction activities taking place on the
premises; provided, that such buildings or trailers shall be
removed upon completion or abandonment of such work.
Sec. 21-77.18. Same--Conditional uses.
The following uses may be allowed by conditional use
subject to the provisions of Section 21-34:
(a) Stock farms.
(b)
unit.
A dwelling unit separated from the principal dwelling
(c) Public and private profit-making clubs, golf courses,
and other recreational facilities.
(d) Planned developments.
(e) Mass transportation.
(f) Two-family dwellings.
(g) Hospitals, clinics, sanitariums, medical and dental
laboratories.
(h) Recreational facilities and grounds
thereto.
appurtenant
(i) Private schools, colleges, libraries and museums.
(j)
gartens.
Family day care homes, child care centers and kinder-
(k) Landfill operations to include the dumping of stumps
and processed materials (not a sanitary landfill).
87-706
(1) Boarding or lodging houses.
(m) Greek letter fraternities or sororities operating in
conjunction with any college, university or community college.
(n) Public and private utility uses, so long as they
require a structure, to include all water, sewer, solid waste
disposal, electric, gas, communications, and natural gas,
liquified petroleum gas (LPG) and petroleum products trans-
missions facilities; in addition, natural gas, liquified
petroleum gas, and petroleum products transmission facilities
above or below ground. The following utility uses shall be
permitted without obtaining a conditional use: (1) public
water and sewer lines and appurtenances; (2) service lines to
individual users, (3) cables, wires or pipes above or below
ground when such uses are located in easements on public roads,
or in public roads.
Sec. 21-77.19. Same--Special exceptions.
The following uses may be allowed by special exception,
subject to the provisions of Section 21-15:
(a) Nonprofit legal service facilities;
(b) Philanthropic and charitable institutions;
(c) Nonprofit civic, social and fraternal clubs and
lodges; nothing in this subsection shall be construed to
include Greek letter fraternities or sororities operating in
conjunction with any college, university or community college;
(d) Cemeteries,
disposal of the dead;
crematories and other places for the
(e)
grounds;
Emergency rescue squad and fire station buildings and
(f) Government buildings;
(g) Greenhouses, hothouses and plant nurseries at which
the products thereof are sold or offered for sale;
(h) A business operated on a lot or parcel inside or
outside of a dwelling unit or accessory building and not a home
occupation; provided, that the owner or operator of the busi-
ness resides on the premises;
(i) A mobile home to be located for a period not to
exceed nine months; provided, that the location of such mobile
home is necessary because the principal residence located on
the premises has been rendered uninhabitable by fire or other
act of God;
(j) Back yard, attic and garage sales which exceed seven
days in duration;
(k) Kennel, private.
Sec. 21-77.20. Required conditions.
The following conditions shall be met in the R-88 Dis-
trict:
(a) Lot area. Each primary structure together with its
accessory structures, hereafter erected shall be located on a
lot having an area of not less than eighty-eight thousand
(88,000) square feet and a width of not less than one hundred
fifty (150) feet, except that where the lot fronts on a major
arterial road, as shown on the County's General Plan, the lot
width shall be increased to three hundred (300) feet. At the
option of the applicant, the area of any lot not having direct
access onto a major arterial road as indicated on the Chester-
field General Plan(s), as amended, may be reduced to not less
87-707
than forty-three thousand five hundred sixty (43,560) square
feet provided that the total number of lots within the platted
subdivision shall not exceed the total number of lots calculat-
ed as follows:
1. Determine gross Site Area by actual on-site survey.
2. Subtract land that is not contiguous:
any parcel that does not abut, adjoin, or share
a common boundary with the rest of the develop-
ment.
land that is cut off from the main parcel by an
existing road, railroad, existing development,
or a perennial stream.
Subtract land area constituting roads and land within
ultimate rights of way of existing roads (as defined
by the Transportation Plan).
Subtract land within the limits of the base flood
area as defined by Section 21-77.3.
Subtract land previously used in calculating the
density of other adjacent subdivisions.
6. Equals base site area.
7. Multiply base site area by: .5
Equals total permitted lots or residential units
permitted on the site.
(b)
Percentage of lot coverage. Ail buildings, including
accessory buildings, on any lot shall not cover more than
twenty percent (20%) of the area of such a lot.
(c)
Front yard Each lot shall have a front yard having a
depth of not less than seventy-five (75) feet.
(d)
Side yard. Each lot shall have two (2) side yards, each
having a width of not less than forty (40) feet.
(e)
Corner side yard. Each corner side yard shall not be less
than seventy-five (75) feet; except that a corner lot back
to back with another corner lot shall have a corner yard
not less than forty (40) feet.
(f)
Rear yard. Each lot shall have a rear yard not less than
fifty (50) feet in depth.
Vote: Unanimous
13.D. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE CODE
OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD RELATING TO DOGS KILLING
OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS OTHER THAN LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY
Chief Pittman stated this date and time had been advertised for
a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the County
Code, relating to dogs killing other domestic animals other
than livestock or poultry. He stated the proposed ordinance is
in response to many calls the Police Department has received
expressing concerns that the County ordinance did not
sufficiently address this matter and should be expanded to the
maximum extent permitted by State law.
Ms. Karen Cundiff, a resident of Richmond, requested a
definition as to what is considered a vicious dog and inquired
if certain breeds of dogs are classified by the proposed
ordinance.
87-708
Mr. Daniel stated the proposed ordinance does not define a
specific breed and would therefore be applicable to all breeds
of dogs. He stated the proposed ordinance establishes the
County's policy for permitting the Animal Control Department to
destroy dogs found to be killing domestic animals as well as
livestock. Mr. Micas stated the existing ordinance is appli-
cable only to the destruction of dogs found to be killing
livestock and the purpose of this proposal is to expand the
ordinance to permit the destruction of dogs believed to be
killing domestic animals as well as livestock.
Mr. Lawrence Mallory inquired if the "pit bull" terrier breed
is classified by this ordinance as a vicious dog. Mr. Daniel
stated he wished to clarify that no legislation in Chesterfield
County has ever identified a specific breed of dog as vicious;
however, legislation in the City of Richmond has isolated the
"pit bull" terrier as a specific breed and any questions with
respect to that matter should be addressed to the Richmond City
Council.
Ms. Marie Chapin inquired why an animal has to kill a child or
another animal before it is considered vicious and stated she
felt an animal could be considered vicious long before such
incidents occur.
Mr. Micas stated approval of the proposed ordinance will
broaden the County ordinance to the maximum extent permitted by
State law. He stated State law stipulates that to impound and
destroy an animal for killing livestock or other animals the
act must be habitual and involve the killing of animals. He
stated, with respect to the the biting of human beings, the law
in Chesterfield requires that said act must occur more than
once; to seize and destroy a dog does not require that killing
a human being occur, only the attack by the animal. Ms. Chapin
stated, although the public hearing does not address breeds of
vicious animals, she would like this Board to consider that
vicious breeds exist and that the Board should consider estab-
lishing a policy addressing animals such as "pit bulls" or
others that are considered and/or bred to be vicious.
Mr. Mayes inquired if there is an existing ordinance prohibit-
ing the destruction of gardens, shrubbery, etc., by livestock
and poultry. Mr. Micas stated there is a "fence law" which
states that if a certain type of livestock extends beyond a
property line and causes damage its owner can be subjected to a
misdemeanor penalty. Mr. Micas stated poultry is not regulated
by the "fence law"; however, staff is preparing an ordinance
provision for the Board's consideration.
Mr. Dodd stated he did not want to see the County become
involved in the "pit bull" terrier controversy as he felt it
would be proven that other breeds of dogs can be considered
just as vicious.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted
the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 5 OF THE CODE
OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS
AMENDED BY ADDING SECTION 5-11.1, RELATING
TO DOGS KILLING OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS OTHER
THAN LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is amended by adding Section 5-11.1 as follows:
Section 5-11.1. Dogs killing other domestic animals other
than livestock or poultry.
It shall be the duty of any animal warden who has reason
to believe that any dog is killing other dogs or domestic
87-709
animals, other than livestock or poultry, to confine the dog.
The animal warden shall apply to a magistrate of the County who
shall issue a warrant requiring the owner or custodian, if
known, to appear before a general district court at a time and
place named therein, at which time evidence shall be heard. If
it shall appear that such a dog has habitually killed other
dogs or domestic animals, the dog shall be ordered killed
immediately by the warden or other officer designated by the
judge.
For similar state law, see Code of Virginia. Section
29-213.86.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Daniel stated he felt the ordinance had been broadened to
the maximum extent permitted by State law and promulgates the
strongest language permissible.
13.E. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT CHAPTER 7
OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD RELATING TO
CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS AND CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT CHANGES
Mr. Hammer stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the County
Code, relating to cable television systems and consideration of
certain franchise agreement changes.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the propos-
ed ordinance.
There was no opposition present.
Mr. Applegate inquired if an extension of the franchise has
been requested. Mr. Hammer stated a request for extension of the
franchise was submitted; however, this agreement does not
provide for an extension and that issue will be considered at a
later date. Mr. Applegate added he had received an increased
number of citizen complaints regarding Storer Cable service.
Mrs. Girone suggested that consideration be given to recording
the School Board meetings as there has been public interest
expressed for such action. Mr. Dodd concurred with the
suggestion. Mr. Daniel stated he felt it proper that a letter
be drafted for his signature to Mr. MacNeilly of Storer Cable
suggesting that the public process be opened and that the
government access channel also transmit the School Board
meetings.
The Board raised questions concerning the timeliness of the
request for approval of cable franchise changes after said
changes were already implemented; expressed concerns that
Federal law has removed many of the negotiated items within the
franchise agreement and suggested it would be appropriate for
the Attorney's office to review this, in light of Federal
legislation, such as those items that are program related which
should no longer be submitted for the Board's consideration;
the utilization of the mobile studio van to provide coverage of
County events; the possibility of increasing the franchise fee;
etc. Mr. Micas stated the Board may, under the County's
franchise agreement, continue to control programatic changes.
Mr. Mayes stated he has observed much improvement in services
in the past several years and he is receiving far less
complaints.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved the following programatic changes:
1. The consolidation of the public, educational and government
channels into one public channel to make more efficient and
87-710
productive use of channel space. In exchange Storer will
provide expanded Board meeting coverage if elected by the
County. Storer will also replace the two consolidate access
channels with "C-Span II" and "Discovery";
2. The replacement WYAH with the "Nostalgia" channel;
3. The elimination of the mobile studio van because of its
lack of use and the need to make effective and efficient use of
resources;
And further the Board adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT CHAPTER 7
OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1978, RELATING TO CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as
amended, is amended and reenacted by amending Chapter 7 as
follows:
Sec. 7-1. Definitions.
O O O
Community antenna system or cable television system. Any
facility consisting of a set of closed transmission paths and
associated signal generation, reception and control equipment
that is designed to provide cable service which includes video
programming and which is provided to multiple subscribers
within a community, except that such definition shall not
include: (1) Any system which serves fewer than two hundred
and fifty subscribers; (2) any system which serves only sub-
scribers in one or more multiple unit dwellings under common
ownership, control or management, unless such facility or
facilities uses any public right-of-way; or (3) a facility that
serves only to retransmit the television signals of one or more
television broadcast stations, (4) a facility of a common
carrier which is subject, in whole or in part, to the provi-
sions of Title II of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.
Section 201 et seq., except that such facility shall be consid-
ered a cable system to the extent such facility is used in the
transmission of video programming directly to subscribers, or
(5) any facilities of any electric utility used solely for
operating its electric systems.
Cable service. The one-way transmission to subscribers of
(i) video programming, or (ii) other programming service, and
subscriber interaction, if any, which is required for the
selection of such video programming or other programming
service.
O O O
Sec. 7-9. Subscriber fees and rates.
The Board of Supervisors shall have the authority to
regulate rates in accordance with state and federal law, rules,
or regulations.
O O O
Vote: Unanimous
13.F. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT CHAPTER 12
OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD RELATING TO
LICENSES
Mr. Hammer stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the Code of
87-711
the County of Chesterfield, relating to licenses which
readopts, on a permanent basis, the ordinance adopted on July
22, 1987.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the
proposed ordinance.
Mr. Daniel submitted a letter from the Retail Merchants'
Association reaffirming their support of the proposed
ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REENACT CHAPTER 12
OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
1978, RELATING TO LICENSES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County:
(1) That Chapter 12, Articles I, XIII, and XIV of the
Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is
amended and reenacted by repealing, amending and adding the
following Sections:
Article I. In General
Section 12-1.1.Exemption from license tax.
Every person engaged in a business, occupation or
profession otherwise taxable pursuant to this chapter shall be
exempt from the duty to apply for a business license or pay
such license tax if the gross receipts for such business,
occupation or profession do not exceed three thousand dollars
($3,000.00) during the taxable year. This exemption shall
apply only to any business, occupation or profession which
would, but for this exemption, pay a license tax the amount of
which would depend upon its gross receipts or purchases.
o o o
Article XIII, Merchants
Division 4. Itinerant and Transient Merchants
Section 12 - 137.Itinerant Merchants - Defined.
Any person who engages in, does or transacts any temporary
or transient business in the county or traveling from place to
place in the sale of goods, wares and merchandise and who for
the purpose of carrying on such business, hires, leases, uses
or occupies any building or structure, motor vehicle, tent,
car, boat or public room or any part thereof, including rooms
in hotels, lodging houses or houses of private entertainment,
or in any public road in the county, for a period of less than
one year, for the exhibition of or sale of such goods, wares or
merchandise, except goods, wares and merchandise received from
bankruptcy sales, trustee sales, railroad wrecks, fire sales,
slaughter sales or sales of like character or designation, and
stock received from expositions and fairs, whether such person
associates temporarily with another merchant or engages in such
temporary or transient business in connection with or as a part
of the business or in the name of another merchant or not,
shall be deemed an itinerant merchant. No person shall be
deemed an itinerant merchant solely because such person
exhibits or otherwise displays goods or services or information
concerning goods or services if such person does not contract
to sell, or offer to contract to sell, such goods or services
at said temporary location.
Section 12-138.Same - License required; amount of tax.
Every itinerant merchant who is not expressly exempt from
tax under the provisions of this Division 4 shall obtain a
87-712
license for the privilege of doing business in the county and
shall pay a license tax of the applicable amount set forth
below:
(a) Unless otherwise provided in some other section of
this code, the license tax for each itinerant merchant, other
than those described in subparagraphs (b), (c), (d), (e) and
(f) shall be five-hundred dollars for each location used during
the tax year.
(b) No license tax shall be imposed on any itinerant
merchant who sells or offers for sale in person or by his
employees only the following items or any of them if such items
were grown or produced by him or by his employees and were not
purchased by them for sale: ice, wood, charcoal, meats, milk,
butter, eggs, poultry, game, vegetables, fruits or other family
supplies of a perishable nature or farm, domestic or nursery
products.
(c) A license tax of fifty dollars for each location used
during the tax year shall be imposed on any itinerant merchant
who sells or offers for sale in person or by his employees only
the following items or any of them if such items were not grown
or produced by him or by his employees: meats, milk, butter,
eggs, poultry, fish, oysters, seafood, game, vegetables, fruits
or other edible family supplies of a perishable nature.
(d) An itinerant merchant whose activities are conducted
solely for charitable purposes and who is not paid for his
services shall not be required to pay any license tax under
this Division 4.
(e) A license tax of fifty dollars for each location used
during the tax year shall be imposed on an itinerant merchant
whose activities are conducted as part of an event conducted or
sponsored by any department of the County government.
(f) A license tax of fifty dollars for each location used
during the tax year shall be imposed on any itinerant merchant
who sells or offers for sale Christmas trees or Christmas
greens not grown or produced by him.
o o o
Section 12-140. Same - Hours of sale of certain merchan-
dise.
No itinerant merchant shall sell, between April 1 and
September 30, both inclusive, between the hours of 7:00 p.m.
and 8:00 a.m., nor between October 1 and March 31, both
inclusive, between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. any
jewelry, diamond or other precious stone, watch, clock, gold or
silverware, gold or silver-plated ware, rugs, curtains,
carpets, tapestries, statuary, porcelains, chinaware, pictures,
paintings, bric-a-brac or articles of virtu. This section
shall not apply to any flea market or craft show licensed under
Section 12-39.1 of this code.
o o o
Article XIV. - Peddlers
Section 12-144. "Peddler" defined.
Any person who carries from place to place any goods,
wares or merchandise and offers to sell or barter the same, or
actually sells or barters the same, and at the time of such
sale or exposure for sale delivers, or offers to deliver, the
goods, wares or merchandise to the buyer is a "peddler". Any
delivery on the day of sale shall be construed as a delivery at
the time of sale. For the purposes of this Article XIV,
bartering or offering to barter goods, wares or merchandise
shall be deemed to be a form of selling or offering to sell
goods, wares or merchandise.
87-713
Section 12-145.
exceptions.
Amount of tax for peddlers generally;
Every peddler who is not expressly exempt from tax under
the provisions of this Article XIV shall obtain a license for
the privilege of doing business in the County and shall pay a
license tax of the applicable amount set forth below:
(a) Unless otherwise provided in some other section of
this Code, the license tax for each peddler other than those
described in subparagraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g)
shall be $500 for the tax year.
(b) Any person who sells or offers to sell goods, wares,
or merchandise to licensed dealers, other than at a definite
place of business operated by the seller, and at the time of
such sale or exposure for sale delivers, or offers to deliver,
the goods, wares or merchandise to the buyer is a "peddler at
wholesale". Any delivery on the day of sale shall be construed
as a delivery at the time of sale. Each peddler at wholesale
shall pay a license tax for the tax year; the license tax rate
for each peddler at wholesale shall be the same as the license
tax rate applicable to a wholesale merchant selling similar
goods, wares or merchandise at one definite place of business.
(c) No license tax shall be imposed on any peddler who
sells or offers for sale in person or by his employees only the
following items or any of them if such items were grown or
produced by him or by his employees and were not purchased by
them for sale: ice, wood, charcoal, meats, milk, butter, eggs,
poultry, game, vegetables, fruits or other family supplies of a
perishable nature or farm, domestic or nursery products.
(d) A license tax of twenty-five dollars for the tax year
shall be imposed on any peddler who sells or offers for sale in
person or by his employees the following items or any of them
if such items were not grown or produced by him or by his
employees: meats, miIk, butter, eggs, poultry, fish, oysters,
seafood, game, vegetables, fruit or other edible family supp-
lies of a perishable nature.
(e) A license tax of twenty-five dollars for the tax year
shall be imposed on any peddler who sells or offers for sale
only Christmas trees or Christmas greens not grown or produced
by him.
(f) A peddler whose activities are conducted solely for
charitable purposes and who is not paid for his services shall
not be required to pay any license tax under this Article XIV.
(g) A license tax of twenty-five dollars for the tax year
shall be imposed on any peddler whose activities are conducted
as part of an event conducted or sponsored by any department of
the County government.
(h) A peddler who sells firewood for home consumption
shall not be required to pay any license tax under this Article
XIV.
Section 12-146. Amount of tax for peddlers of home-grown
agricultural products and for peddlers of groceries generally.
Section 12-147. Seafood peddlers.
Section 12-148. Peddling to licensed dealers or
retailers.
Section 12-149. Tags.
Every person who is licensed as a peddler and has paid the
tax required under this Article XIV shall be provided a license
tin or tag which shall be affixed to the person of the peddler
or, if the peddler obtains a license per vehicle, then to the
vehicle used by the peddler.
o o o
87-714
Section 12-150.1. Applicability of tax to each person
conducting activities of a peddler.
The license tax imposed under this Article XIV shall be
imposed upon each person and each agent of a corporation,
association, or other entity who conducts the activities of a
peddler; except that peddlers who peddle from and in close
proximity to any vehicle and who all peddle the same type of
goods, wares or merchandise may obtain a peddler license, which
shall list the names of said peddlers, for each vehicle rather
than for each peddler peddling from and in close proximity to
such vehicle and the license tax for such license shall be the
amount of tax that would otherwise have been charged to each of
said peddlers.
(2) That the above cited ordinance amendments, which were
adopted on an emergency basis on July 22, 1987, with certain
sections effective August 1, 1987, shall be readopted and
continued in full force and effect.
Vote: Unanimous
14. NEW BU$INESS
14.A. ADOPT ON EMERGENCY BASIS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE
IV OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY REGARDING
LEAF BURNING AND CONSIDERATION OF PROVIDING VACUUM SER-
VICE TO THE HANDICAPPED AT NO CHARGE AND SET DATE FOR
PUBLIC HEARING
Mr. Hammer stated, in response to citizens' comments and at the
request of the Board, staff reviewed the current leaf burning
ordinance and determined it would be appropriate to amend the
fall burning period of November 1 to December 1 to the period
beginning November 15 and ending December 15 and to request
consideration for providing vacuum service to the physically
handicapped at no charge. He stated the Board is requested to
adopt the proposed ordinance on a emergency basis to implement
such service and to set a date for a public hearing to readopt
said ordinance on a permanent basis.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the propos-
ed ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
adopted the following ordinance on an emergency basis and set
the date of October 14, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public
hearing:
AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL SECTIONS 10-22 TO 10-24 OF THE
CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, 1978,
AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE BURNING OF LEAVES AND ADD
SAME WITH SECTIONS 10-25 TO 10-28
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Chesterfield, Virginia:
(1) That Section 10-22, 10-23 and 10-24 of the Code of
the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, 1978, as amended, is
hereby repealed.
(2) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, !978, as
amended, is amended by adding the following sections which
shall read as follows:
Sec. 10-25. Leaf burning.
a) It shall be unlawful for any person in the county to
burn leaves from trees on property where they reside except:
From March 15 through April 15 and November 15 through December
15 from 8:00 a.m. on Monday to noon on Friday. Any such
burning shall not be within three hundred feet of any woodland
or brushland unless it takes place between the hours of 4:00
p.m. and midnight.
87-715
b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this ordi-
nance, no person shall burn leaves within the bounds of any
area designated and duly proclaimed by the board of supervisors
as a "No Burn Area" and in which a county leaf pickup service
shall be provided even during the periods when leaf burning
under such subsection a) would be otherwise permitted.
Sec. 10-26. Leaf pick-up service.
In the event the board of supervisors shall choose to
designate an area of the county a "No Burn Area" or to make
leaf pickup service available in a designated area, it shall do
so by describing such area by reference to commonly recognized
roads, subdivisions and landmarks in a notice published once a
week for two (2) successive weeks in a newspaper having general
circulation in such area and by posting such notice in at least
five (5) public places within the area so designated.
Sec. 10-27. Penalties.
Any person violating any provision of this article shall,
upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be liable
to a fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each
violation.
Vote: Unanimous
14.B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS
14.B.1. SOUTHERN CHESTERFIELD CORRIDOR STUDY
Mr. Sale stated Board approval is requested for adoption of a
resolution asking the Tri-Cities Area MPO to proceed with a
corridor study for a new highway in southern Chesterfield.
Discussion ensued regarding an agreement for full consideration
of reallocating funding for any road that would connect 1-95/
1-85 being reassigned to a federally-funded project known as
the Chippenham/Laburnum Connector; the County's position on
said agreement; the inclusion in the Tri-Cities' MPO
transportation plan a feasibility study for a new facility from
Ettrick to Petersburg connecting southern Chesterfield to
1-95/I-85 and funding sources for said project; etc.
It was generally agreed that Chesterfield County's representa-
tive to the Tri-Cities' MPO would convey to the MPO the
County's position regarding the Chippenham/Laburnum Connector
and advise them to be cognizant that commitments, using the
interstate funding mechanism for the Chippenham/Laburnum
Connector, have been made.
Mr. Daniel requested staff make a copy of the record,
reflecting this commitment, available to the Crater MPO.
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, in July, 1986, the Board of Supervisors of
Chesterfield County requested the Tri-Cities MPO to include in
their Transportation Plan a feasibility study for a new bridge
crossing over the Appomattox River and railroad tracks from
Ettrick to Petersburg which would connect southern Chesterfield
to 1-95/I-85; and
WHEREAS, the study is included in the Tri-Cities Area
FY-88 Work Program; and
WHEREAS, the scope of this study should be expanded to
include all feasible corridors within a study area generally
bounded by 1-95, Route 10, Nash Road, River Road, 1-85 and
Route 460; and
87-716
WHEREAS, a new highway facility in this area will promote
economic development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Super-
visors requests the MPO to immediately proceed with the expand-
ed study.
Vote: Unanimous
14.B.2. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON TAX ADJUSTMENT FOR RE-
HABILITATED HISTORIC LANDMARKS
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board set
the date of October 14, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public
hearing to consider adoption of an ordinance relating to tax
adjustment for rehabilitated historic landmarks.
Vote: Unanimous
14.B.3. RESOLUTION CONFIRMING PROCEEDINGS OF INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Mr. Daniel disclosed to the Board that he is Manager of
Planning for Park 500 which is one of Philip Morris' plants,
declared a conflict of interest pursuant to the Virginia
Comprehensive Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from
the meeting.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of the
County of Chesterfield (the Authority), has considered the
application of Philip Morris Incorporated (the Company) for the
issuance of the Authority's pollution control revenue refunding
bonds in an amount not to exceed $6,000,000 (the Bonds) to
refund the Authority's $6,000,000 Pollution Control Revenue
Bonds (Philip Morris Incorporated Project), Series of 1975 (the
1975 Bonds) which were issued in conjunction with the
Authority's $5,500,000 Pollution Control Revenue Bonds and
$1,000,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds to finance the
Company's acquisition, construction and installation of certain
air and water pollution control and solid waste and sewage
disposal facilities (the Project) at the Philip Morris
Incorporated manufacturing plants at 4100 Bermuda Hundred Road,
Chesterfield County, Virginia and at 3601 Commerce Road,
Richmond, Virginia, and, in connection therewith, the
substitution of a related entity of the Company for the Company
as obligor with respect to the Bonds, and has held a public
hearing thereon on August 25, 1987; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has requested the Board of
Supervisors (the Board) of the County of Chesterfield (the
County), to approve the issuance of the Bonds to comply with
Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Code); and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving
the issuance of the Bonds and the proposed substitution,
subject to terms to be agreed upon, a record of the public
hearing and a "fiscal impact statement" with respect to the
Project have been filed with the Board;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF CHESTERFIELD:
1. The Board hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds
by the Industrial Development Authority of the County of
Chesterfield to the extent required by Section 147(f) of the
Code.
87-717
2. Approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as required by
Section 147(f) of the Code, does not constitute an endorsement
of the Bonds or the creditworthiness of the Company, but, as
required by Section 15.1-1380 of the Code of Virginia of 1950,
as amended, the Bonds shall provide that neither the County nor
the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bonds or the
interest thereon or other costs incident thereto except from
the revenues and moneys pledged therefor, and neither the faith
or credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the County
nor the Authority shall be pledged thereto.
3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
Ayes: Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Daniel.
Mr. Daniel returned to the meeting.
14.B.4. DELL DRIVE STORM SEWER SYSTEM
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
appropriated $16,000 from the Midlothian Three Cent Road Fund
and $26,115 from the Clover Hill Three Cent Road Fund for the
storm sewer installation on Dell Drive and adopted the follow-
ing resolution:
WHEREAS, Dell Drive (Route 2144) currently has an open
ditch in the median which creates a safety hazard; and
WHEREAS, the citizens in the Forestdale Subdivision have
requested the County to replace this ditch with a storm sewer
system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Super-
visors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to
install a storm sewer system on Dell Drive from Turner Road to
McKesson Drive with the County providing no more than $42,115
for this installation.
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Applegate expressed appreciation for the diligent efforts
of Mr. John McCracken, Mr. Dennis Morrison, Mr. Charles Perry
and Mr. Sale to improve the storm sewer system at Dell Drive.
He also expressed appreciation to Mrs. Girone for sharing the
expense to assist with completion of the project.
14.B.5. STREET LIGHT REQUEST
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
approved the installation of a street light at the intersection
of Old Gun Road West and Silbyrd Drive with any associated cost
to be expended from the Midlothian District Street Light Funds.
Vote: Unanimous
14.C. CONSENT ITEMS
14.C.1. REQUEST FOR BINGO/RAFFLE PERMIT
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved the request for a raffle permit for the Crestwood PTA
for the calendar year 1987.
Vote: Unanimous
14.C.2. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
87-718
examination of Foxberry Drive, Den Bark Drive, Blue Tick Court
North, Blue Tick Court South, Cropper Circle, Cropper Court
North, Cropper Court South, Vixen Circle, Vixen Lane, Fox-
catcher Court, Rasper Court and Leveret Lane in Foxberry,
Sections 2 and 3, Clover Hill District.
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded
by Mrs. Girone, it is resolved that Foxberry Drive, Den Bark
Drive, Blue Tick Court North, Blue Tick Court South, Cropper
Circle, Cropper Court North, Cropper Court South, Vixen Circle,
Vixen Lane, Foxcatcher Court, Rasper Court and Leveret Lane in
Foxberry, Sections 2 and 3, Clover Hill District, be and they
hereby are established as public roads.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Foxberry Drive, beginning at existing Fox-
berry Drive, State Route 3727, and going southeasterly 0.03
mile to its intersection with Blue Tick Court North and Blue
Tick Court South, then continuing southeasterly 0.06 mile to
its intersection with Cropper Circle, then going easterly 0.05
mile to its intersection with Cropper Court North and Cropper
Court South, then going northeasterly 0.07 mile to its inter-
section with Vixen Circle and Vixen Lane, then continuing
northeasterly 0.06 mile to end at its intersection with Fox-
catcher Court; Den Bark Drive, beginning at the intersection
with Foxcatcher Court and the terminus of Foxberry Drive and
going northerly 0.05 mile to its intersection with Rasper
Court, then going northwesterly 0.01 mile to tie into existing
Den Bark Drive, State Route 3723; Blue Tick Court North,
beginning at the intersection with Foxberry Drive and going
northeasterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Blue Tick Court
South, beginning at the intersection with Foxberry Drive and
going southwesterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Cropper
Circle, beginning at the intersection with Foxberry Drive and
going southerly 0.03 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Cropper Court
North, beginning at the intersection with Foxberry Drive and
going northwesterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Cropper
Court South, beginning at the intersection with Foxberry Drive
and going southeasterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Vixen
Circle, beginning at the intersection with Foxberry Drive and
going northwesterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Vixen
Lane, beginning at the intersection with Foxberry Drive and
going southeasterly 0.08 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Fox-
catcher Court, beginning at the intersection with Foxberry
Drive and Den Bark Drive and going northeasterly 0.10 mile to
end in a cul-de-sac; Rasper Court, beginning at the inter-
section with Den Bark Drive and going northeasterly 0.11 mile
to end in a cul-de-sac; and Leveret Lane, beginning at existing
Leveret Lane, State Route 3720, and going southwesterly 0.08
mile to end in a temporary turnaround.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
easements.
These roads serve 98 lots.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 40'
right-of-way for all of these roads except Foxberry Drive and
Vixen Lane which have a 50' right-of-way.
These sections of Foxberry are recorded as follows:
Section 2.
Section 3.
Plat Book 47, Page 92, November 21, 1984.
Plat Book 49, Page 16, April 18, 1985.
Vote: Unanimous
This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with
directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his
examination of Krause Road in Courthouse Commons, Matoaca
District.
87-719
Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded
by Mrs. Girone, it is resolved that Krause Road in Courthouse
Commons, Matoaca District, be and it hereby is established as a
public road.
And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of
Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the
Secondary System, Krause Road, beginning at the intersection
with Iron Bridge Road, State Route 10, and running southwest-
erly 0.26 mile to tie into Beach Road, State Route 655.
This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance
and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage
easements.
This road serves the adjacent commercial property.
And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors
guarantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a
variable 50' to 100' right-of-way for this road.
Courthouse Commons is recorded as follows:
Plat Book 55, Page 31, November 24, 1986.
Vote: Unanimous
14.C.3. APPROPRIATION OF INDUSTRIAL PARK RESERVES
Mr. Ramsey stated the amount of the appropriation should be
amended to $40,000 rather than the $20,000 indicated in the
Board paper for the Industrial Park Reserves.
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved an appropriation of $40,000 from the Industrial Park
Reserve Account to the Airport Industrial Park Capital
Improvements account for anticipated Industrial Park
improvements.
Vote: Unanimous
14.C.4. ACCEPTANCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PREVENTION GRANT
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
accepted a grant in the amount of $10,000 from the Virginia
Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance
Abuse Services for an innovative, community-based, prevention
initiative which will assist youth in the Ettrick area to plan
and implement constructive community-wide programs; and author-
ized the appropriation of $10,000 for receipts and expenditures
to the appropriate accounts. (It is noted there will be no
current or future commitment of local funds and continuation
will depend on private contributions.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.D. APPOINTMENTS - RICHMOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COM-
MISSION CITIZENS TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board
accepted Mrs. Elaine Rubin's resignation from the Richmond
Regional Planning District Commission Citizens Transportation
Advisory Committee effective August 21, 1987.
Vote: Unanimous
It was generally agreed to defer nomination of a replacement
until a later date.
87-720
14.E. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ITEMS
14.E.1. PUBLIC HEARINGS
14.E.l.a. TO CONSIDER VACATION OF A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT WITHIN ROCKPORT LANDING
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider the vacation of 30 feet of a 50 foot
temporary construction easement across Lot 16 within Rockport
Landing.
No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the propos-
ed ordinance.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE to vacate 30' of a 50 foot wide con-
struction easement within Lot 16, Rockport Landing
Clover Hill Magisterial District, Chesterfield
County, Virginia, as shown on a plat thereof duly
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of Chesterfield County in Plat Book 34, at page 81
and 82.
WHEREAS, Warren W. Kelly petitioned the Board of Super-
visors of Chesterfield County, Virginia to vacate a 30' of a 50
foot construction easement within Lot 16, Rockport Landing,
Clover Hill Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia
more particularly shown on a plat of record in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of said County in Plat Book 34,
pages 81 and 82, made by J. K. Timmons & Associates, Inc. dated
October 11, 1979. The construction easement petitioned to be
vacated is more fully described as follows:
A Portion of a 50 foot construction easement within
Lot 16, Rockport Landing the location of which is
more fully shown, cross hatched on a plat made by J.
K. Timmons & Associates, Inc. dated October 11, 1979,
a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of
this ordinance.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to Section 15.1-
431 of the Code of Virqinia, 1950, as amended, by advertising;
and
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance of
the portion of the construction easement sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid portion of the
construction easement be and is hereby vacated.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this Ordinance,
together with the plat attached hereto shall be recorded no
sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of Chesterfield, Virginia pursuant to Section
15.1-485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The effect of this Ordinance pursuant to Section 15.1-483
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the
portion of the plat vacated. This ordinance shall vest fee
simple title of the portion of the construction easement hereby
vacated in the property owner of the lot within Rockport
Landing free and clear of any rights of public use.
87-721
Accordingly, this Ordinance shall be indexed in the names
of the County of Chesterfield, as grantor, and Warren W. Kelly
and Katherine A. Kelly (husband and wife) and Craig J. Kelly
(unmarried), or their successors in title, as grantee.
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.l.b. TO CONSIDER VACATION AND APPROVAL TO QUITCLAIM A
PERMANENT AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ON EASTERN SIDE
OF SWIFT CREEK RESERVOIR
Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a
public hearing to consider vacation of a portion of a 50 foot
wide permanent sewer easement and a 25 foot wide construction
easement on either side of the permanent easement between
Genito Road and the Swift Creek Water Treatment Plant, on the
eastern side of the Swift Creek Reservoir and to execute a
quitclaim deed to vacate the portion of the easement which lies
outside the recorded subdivisions.
No one came forward to address the matter.
opposition present.
There was no
There was brief discussion regarding the reason for vacation of
the easement; if all the necessary easements had been vacated;
etc.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and the
County Administrator to execute the following Quitclaim deed to
vacate that portion of the easement which lies outside the
recorded subdivision:
This Quitclaim Deed dated September 9, 1987, by and
between the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, a political
subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, ("COUNTY"), and
BRANDERMILL, A Virginia General Partnership, and BRANDERMILL
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., A Virginia non-stock corporation,
("OWNERS").
WITNESSETH: That by easement agreement dated July 2,
1975, from Brandermill, a Virginia Partnership and Joint
Venture, by Sea Pines of Virginia, Inc., a Joint Venturer, a
certain sewer easement and temporary construction easements
were conveyed to the County and recorded January 9, 1976 in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in
Deed Book 1183, page 28, and by easement agreement dated
January 11, 1978, from Brandermill, a Virginia General Partner-
ship, another certain sewer easement and temporary construction
easements were conveyed to the County and recorded February 17,
1978 in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1302, page
352; and,
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the COUNTY to vacate the
aforesaid sewer and temporary construction easements.
NOW THEREFORE: For and in consideration of the sum of one
dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the COUNTY does hereby
release, unto OWNERS all its claims upon the aforementioned
sewer and temporary construction easements.
In witness whereof, the County of Chesterfield, Virginia,
has caused this Quitclaim Deed to be executed by Harry G.
Daniel, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, and attested by
Lane B. Ramsey, County Administrator, pursuant to the authority
set forth in a Board resolution duly adopted on September 9,
1987 which is in full force and effect.
Vote: Unanimous
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
adopted the following ordinance:
87-722
AN ORDINANCE to vacate 50 foot permanent sewer
easements and 25 foot temporary construction ease-
ments lying along the eastern side of the Swift Creek
Reservoir between the south right of way line of
Genito Road, State Route 604, and the Swift Creek
Water Treatment Plant, Clover Hill Magisterial
District, Chesterfield County, Virginia.
WHEREAS, By easement agreement dated July 2, 1975 from
Brandermill, a Virginia Partnership and Joint Venture, by Sea
Pines of Virginia, Inc., a Joint Venturer, a certain sewer
easement and temporary construction easements were conveyed to
the county and recorded January 9, 1976, in the Clerk's Office
of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County in Deed Book 1183,
page 28, and by easement agreement dated January 11, 1978, from
Brandermill, a Virginia General Partnership, another certain
sewer easement and temporary construction easements were
conveyed to the County and recorded February 17, 1978, in the
aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1302, page 352; and,
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the County to vacate the
aforesaid easements.
The 50 foot permanent sewer easements and 25 foot tempo-
rary construction easements to be vacated are more fully
described as follows:
50 foot permanent sewer easements and 25 foot tempo-
rary construction easements in Clover Hill Magis-
terial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia as
shown on Plats thereof duly recorded in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County,
as follows: Across Lots 18-24, 32-37, and open
space, within Regatta Pointe, in Plat Book 37, pages
26,27, Lots 7-9, Block A, Lots 6,7, and 16-18, Block
B, and open space, within Shallowford Trace, in Plat
Book 32, pages 74-76, Lot 14, and, open space, within
Walker's Ferry, in Plat Book 31, pages 43,44, Lots
9-12, and 12A, within Walker's Ferry, revised Lots
9-13, in Plat Book 32, page 43, Lot 9, and open
space, within Riverbirch Trace, in Plat Book 30,
pages 62,63, Lot 25, and open space, within a
resubdivision of a portion of Commodore Point, in
Plat Book 33, page 89, the open space, within Mc-
Tyre's Cove, in Plat Book 29, pages 8-10, the open
space, within Winterberry Ridge, in Plat Book 22,
pages 63,64, the open space, within Litchfield Bluff,
in Plat Book 23, page 67, Lots 1-3, Block L, and open
space, within Long Shadow, Phase II, resubdivision
Section 1, in Plat Book 34, pages 21,22, Lots 1-6,
Block D, and open space, within Long Shadow, Second
Section, Phase II, revised, in Plat Book 32, pages
69,70, and the open space, within Long Shadow, Second
Section revised, in Plat Book 32, pages 71,72.
WHEREAS, notice has been given pursuant to section 15.1-
431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, by advertising;
and
WHEREAS, no public necessity exists for the continuance of
the 50 foot permanent sewer easements and 25 foot temporary
construction easements sought to be vacated.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended, the aforesaid, 50 foot permanent
sewer easements and 25 foot temporary construction easements be
and are hereby vacated.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect in
accordance with section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia,
87-723
1950, as amended, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall
be recorded no sooner than thirty days hereafter in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia
pursuant to section 15.1-485 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended.
The effect of this ordinance pursuant to section 15.1-483
is to destroy the force and effect of the recording of the
portions of the plats vacated. This ordinance shall vest fee
simple title of the easements hereby vacated in the respective
owners of the lots and open spaces within the aforementioned
subdivisions free and clear of any right of public use.
Accordingly, this ordinance shall be indexed in the names
of the County of Chesterfield, as grantor, and KENNETH BAKER
and MAUREEN BAKER, (husband and wife), WILLIAM R. BARNES AND
JAMELLE A. BARNES, (husband and wife), LORRAINE D. BARREE,
(unmarried), B. HANCEL BONDS and BETTY F. BONDS, (husband and
wife), BRANDERMILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, A Virginia non-stock
corporation, BRUCE H. BROECKER, PAUL J. CALLIHAN and JEAN A.
CALLIHAN, (husband and wife), FORREST NELSON CLAPP, JR., and
BETTY HUNTER-CLAPP, (husband and wife), LAWRENCE F. CLARK and
WANDA A. CLARK, (husband and wife), JOSEPH D. COFFEY and ELOISE
G. COFFEY, (husband and wife), HENRY B. CREECH and VALRIE
CREECH, (husband and wife), BENJAMIN E. DENTON, III, (unmarri-
ed), HORST DUFFING, MARIO R. ESCOBAR, JAMES D. FRAZER and LINDA
S. FRAZER, (husband and wife), ANTHONY M. GIORDANO and LYNNAE
K. GIORDANO, (husband and wife), STUART R. GOLDE, (unmarried),
ROBERT C. GRAHAM and SUSAN E. GRAHAM, (husband and wife),
WYNSTON D. HOLBROOK and REBECCA P. HOLBROOK, (husband and
wife), NANCY A. HUNT, (as her sole and separate equitable
estate), STEPHEN R. JONES and ANN S. JONES, (husband and
wife), PAUL W. KEMPE and MARY E. KEMPE, (husband and wife),
JOSEPH R. LABBATE and MURIEL LABBATE, (husband and wife),
JOELLE LAU-HANSEN, BONNIE A. MACLAUCHLAN, (unmarried), M.B.R.,
INC., A Virginia Corporation, H. CARTER MYERS, III, and ANN T.
MYERS, (husband and wife), RICHARD F. PEOTROWSKI and NANCY L.
PEOTROWSKI, (husband and wife), DONALD E. PLORDE, ANITA M.
PRIVITERA, (as her sole and separate equitable estate), GERALD
H. SCHEPKER and MARY JANE SCHEPKER, (husband and wife), SUSAN
GAYLE SWEENEY, (as her sole and separate equitable estate),
DAVID A. TREBOUR and LUCY L. TREBOUR, (husband and wife),
ROBERT A. WEATHERFORD and LORRAINE G. WEATHERFORD, (husband and
wife), GERALDINE S. WILSON, (unmarried), STEVEN D. WOMACK and
BRETT H. WOMACK, (husband and wife), DAVID C. YOUNG and ASTRID
F. YOUNG, (husband and wife), CHARLES M. ZACHARIAS, JR., and
ELAINE S. ZACHARIAS, (husband and wife), R. SCOTT ZIEGLER and
DIANNE E. ZIEGLER, (husband and wife), or their successors in
title, as grantees.
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.2. AUTHORIZATION TO FORWARD SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMEND-
MENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION
Mr. Sale stated Board approval is requested to forward a
Subdivision Ordinance amendment regarding the extension of
public water to the Planning Commission for deliberation and to
set a public hearing date on November 12, 1987 for the Board's
consideration of said ordinance.
There was brief discussion regarding the establishment of the
Residential (R-88) District classification and how it relates
to the extension of public water service to these size lots (2
acres); etc.
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board
approved and authorized staff to forward a Subdivision Ordi-
nance amendment to the Planning Commission and set the date of
November 12, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing by the
Board of Supervisors on amendments to the Subdivision and
Utilities Ordinances.
Vote: Unanimous
87-724
14.E.3. RIGHT-OF-WAY ITEMS
14.E.3.a. REQUEST FROM COMFORT HOMES, INC. TO AID IN ACQUIRING
WATER EASEMENT ALONG BELLBLUFF DRIVE
Mr. Applegate disclosed to the Board that an agent with his
realty firm is associated with this case, declared a potential
conflict of interest, pursuant to the Virginia Comprehensive
Conflict of Interest Act and excused himself from the meeting.
Mr. Sale stated Board approval is requested to assist Comfort
Homes, Inc. in acquiring a water easement across the property
of Ms. Jane F. Swineford for the extension of a water line to
serve their property on Bellbluff Drive.
Mrs. Swineford stated approval of the request across her
property will ruin several 100-year old Oak trees that she does
not want destroyed and noted there are alternative routes
available for providing water to the subject property which she
would prefer be used.
After a brief discussion, it was generally agreed that a
deferral would be beneficial to resolve the concerns of those
involved and to determine if an alternative route is available.
On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
deferred consideration of a request from Comfort Homes, Inc. to
aid them in acquiring a water easement across the property of
Ms. Jane F. Swineford until September 23, 1987 and to allow all
involved to meet and discuss the matter.
Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone.
Absent: Mr. Applegate.
Mr. Applegate returned to the meeting.
14.E.3.b. CONSIDER CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS FOR WATER EASE-
MENTS ALONG LAWING DRIVE AGAINST MR. AND MRS. THOMAS
BOWSER~ MR. AND MRS. WILLIE BOWSER AND MR. AND MRS.
CLIFFORD THOMPSON
On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board author-
ized the County Attorney to institute condemnation proceedings
against the following property owners if the amount as set
opposite their names is not accepted. And be it further
resolved that the County Administrator notify said property
owners by registered mail on September 10, 1987, of the
County's intention to enter upon and take the property which is
to be the subject of said condemnation proceedings. This
action is on an emergency basis and the County intends to
exercise immediate right of entry pursuant to Section
15.1-238.1 of the Code of Virginia.
Thomas E. and
Sheryl A. Bowser
Lawing Drive
$70.00
Willie Lee and
Effie Vernell Bowser
Lawing Drive
$141.00
Clifford and
Margaret Thompson
Lawing Drive
$194.00
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd stated he hoped that staff would continue
negotiations; however, he did not want to delay the project.
14.E.4. CONSENT ITEMS
14.E.4.a. SEWER CONTRACT FOR IRONBRIDGE ON-SITE TRUNK SEWER..,
PHASE II
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
87-725
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any
necessary documents for the following sewer contract:
Ironbridge Onsite Trunk Sewer - Phase II
Developer: Ironbridge Development Company
Contractor: G. L. Howard, Inc.
Total Contract Cost:
Total Estimated County Cost:
(Refund through connection fees)
Estimated Developer Cost:
Number of Connections: Future Connections
Code: 5B-2511-997
$255,960.00
$ 7,355.85
$248,604.15
Vote: Unanimous
Mr. Dodd expressed appreciation to the Utilities Department for
bringing improvements into the Enon area in a timely fashion.
14.E.4.b. CONTRACT FOR WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG LAWING
DRIVE BETWEEN OLD BERMUDA HUNDRED ROAD AND WOODS
EDGE ROAD
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary documents awarding contract W87-1B for construction
of the water line along Lawing Drive between Old Bermuda
Hundred Road and Woods Edge Road to the low bidder, O. D.
Duncanson, Jr. & Son Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$119,284.79. (It is noted this project will be funded by the
1987-1988 Capital Improvements Budget.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.4.c. CONTRACT FOR WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG BERMUDA
HUNDRED ROAD BETWEEN ROUTE 295 AND ENON CHURCH ROAD
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary documents awarding contract W87-3B for construction
of the water line along Bermuda Hundred Road between Route 295
and Enon Church Road to the low bidder, Lyttle Utilities, Inc.,
in the amount of $187,869.55. (It is noted this project will
be funded by the 1987-88 Capital Improvements Budget.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.4.d. AGREEMENT WITH VDOT FOR RELOCATION OF WATER AND
SEWER LINES AT INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 10 AND ROUTE 1
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute an
agreement, subject to approval of the County Attorney, with the
Virginia Department of Transportation, Project Number 0010-020-
118, C502, for the relocation of water and sewer lines at the
intersection of Iron Bridge Road (Route 10) and Jefferson Davis
Highway (Route 1/301), due to reconstruction of said
intersection. And further the Board approved funding for this
project, County Number W87-95C, from 5H-5835-586N, in the
amount of $49,112.79 and from 5H-5835-6A3R, in the amount of
$100,000.00 to be transferred to the Capital Improvement Budget
for Miscellaneous Highway Projects, 5H-5835-400E. (It is noted
the County is responsible for 100% of the cost of the water
facility adjustments and the State is responsible for 100% of
the sewer facility adjustments.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.4.e. VACATION OF WATER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS
PROPERTY OF VERNON E. LAPRADE,. TRUSTEE
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and County
87-726
Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed vacating a 50' water
and drainage easement across the property of Vernon E. LaPrade,
Trustee. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.4.f. VACATION OF INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT ACROSS
PROPERTY OF T. A. INVESTMENTS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and County
Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed vacating a portion of
a 30 foot ingress and egress easement across the property of T.
A. Investments. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers
of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.4.~. VACATION OF INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT ACROSS
PROPERTY OF JAMES V. DANIELS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the Chairman of the Board and County
Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed vacating a 30 foot
ingress and egress easement across the property of James V.
Daniels. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this
Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.4.h. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG JEFFERSON
DAVIS HIGHWAY
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the
County, the conveyance of a 15' strip of land along Jefferson
Davis Highway from Samuel B. Jr., & Betty M. Thomas and Lelon
A. & Elizabeth A. Moore. (A copy of the plat is filed with the
papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.4.i. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG BAILEY BRIDGE
ROAD FROM MR. AND MRS. DANE GOINS
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the
County, the conveyance of a 45' strip of land along Bailey
Bridge Road from Dane and Diane Goins. (A copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.4.j. DEED OF DEDICATION FROM INVESTOR'S WOODLAKE DEVELOP-
MENT CORPORATION
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the
necessary deed of dedication accepting on behalf of the County,
the conveyance from Investor's Woodlake Development Corporation
of property for a new County soccer facility adjacent to the
Woodlake development. (A copy of the described property is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
87-727
Mr. Applegate expressed appreciation to Mr. Stith, Mr. Micas
and their staff for their diligent efforts in this matter.
14.E.4.k. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR PUBLIC WATER IN A
PORTION OF GLEBE POINT
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board
approved the extension of a waterline in a portion of Glebe
Point Subdivision and the establishment of an assessment
district to finance the extension. (A copy of the plat is
filed with the papers of this Board.)
Vote: Unanimous
14.E.5. REPORTS
Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report on the developer
water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator.
14.F. REPORTS
Mr. Ramsey stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has
formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following
streets into the State Secondary Road System:
ADDITIONS LENGTH
STONEHENGE WEST - SECTION 3
Route 1073 (Ashtree Road) - From 0.04 mile east
of Route 624 to 0.04 mile west of Route 1084 0.16 mi.
Route 3116 (Rossmere Drive) - From Route 1073
to 0.06 mile north of Route 1073 0.06 mi.
Route 3117 (Ashtree Place) - From Route 1073
to a northeast cul-de-sac 0.05 mi.
SUMMIT POINT SUBDIVISION
Route 1660 (Ludgate Road) - From 0.03 mile east
of Route 1659 to a northeast cul-de-sac
Route 3280 (Eagle Point Road) - From 0.03 mile
south of Route 1552 to Route 3281
Route 3281 (Ludgate Place) - From Route 1660 to
a northeast cul-de-sac
Route 3282 (Ludgate Court) - From Route 3281 to
a southeast cul-de-sac
Route 3283 (Biltmore Road) - From Route 1660 to
Route 1587
0.44 mi.
0.03 mi.
0.19 mi.
0.05 mi.
0.07 mi.
MISTWOOD FOREST - SECTION 2
Route 3470 (Mistwood Forest Drive) - From 0.02
mile north of Route 3474 to Route 619-North
Route 3471 (Sonnenburg Drive) - From 0.01 mile
west of Route 3470-East to Route 3470-West
0.65 mi.
0.15 mi.
STONEMILL - SECTIONS B&C
Route 2718 (Stone River Road) - From Route 2700
to 0.02 mile southwest of Route 3718
Route 3718 (Ferncreek Place) - From Route 2718
to 0.10 mile southeast of Route 2718
0.11 mi.
0.10 mi.
87-728
ADDITIONS
LENGTH
EDGEWOOD - SECTION 2, BEECHWOOD - SECTION A
Route 3440 (Sunbeam Road) - From 0.05 mile south
of Route 2380 to Route 2339
0.20 mi.
Route 3442 (Windy Oaks Lane) - From Route 637
to a west cul-de-sac
0.11 mi.
Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a status report on the
General Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road
Reserve Funds, District Road and Street Light Funds, Lease
Purchases and School Literary Loans as well as a copy of the
School Board Agenda.
15. ADJOURNMEN~
On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board
adjourned at 8:50 p.m. until 9:00 a.m. on September 23, 1987.
Vote: Unanimous
County Administrat%r
Chairman
87-729