Loading...
10-14-1987 MinutesBOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES October 14, 1987 Supervisors in Attendance: Mr. Harry G. Daniel, Chairman Mr. Jesse J. Mayes, Vice Chairman Mr. G. H. Applegate Mr. R. Garland Dodd Mrs. Joan Girone Mr. Lane B. Ramsey County Administrator Staff in Attendance: Mrs. Doris DeHart, Legislative Coord. Ms. Joan Dolezal, Clerk to the Board Mr. Bradford S. Hammer, Asst. Co. Admin. Ms. Alice Heffner, Youth Svcs. Coord. Mr. William Howell, Dir., Gen. Services Mr. Thomas Jacobson, Dir. of Planning Mr. Manton Kibler, Nursing Home Contrl. Mr. Robert Masden, Asst. Co. Admin. for Human Services Mr. Jacob Mast, Jr., Nursing Home Admin. Mr. R. J. McCracken, Transp. Director Mr. Richard McElfish, Dir. of Env. Eng. Mr. Steve Micas, Co. Attorney Mrs. Pauline Mitchell, Dir. of News/Info. Services Mr. Richard Sale, Asst. Co. Admin. for Development Mr. M. D. Stith, Jr., Dir. of Parks & Rec. Dr. Robert Wagenknecht, Dir. of Libraries Mr. David Welchons, Dir. of Utilities Mr. Frederick Willis, Dir. of Human Resource Management 1. LUNCH Mr. Daniel called the meeting to order at 12:00 Noon (EDST) at the Chesterfield Technical Center at which time the Board had lunch with the German CRF recipients of the Ameurop Cultural Relation Fellowship Foundation. The Board recessed to travel to the Courthouse for its schedul- ed work session. Reconvening: Mr. Daniel called the work session to order at 2:10 p.m. (EDST) in the Administration Building Conference Room (Room 502). 87-787 2. WORK SESSIONS 2.A. LIBRARY CAPITAL NEEDS Mr. Masden stated the purpose of the work session was to pro- vide the Board with a brief outline regarding the findings of the Library Capital Needs Assessment study, which was authoriz- ed by the Board and conducted over the past two years by Drs. Rugg and Johnson from Virginia Commonwealth University. Dr. Wagenknecht presented a brief overview of the study data, providing information relative to the need for expansion of the County public libraries, circulation statistics, volume capac- ity and public seating distribution, the number of volumes own- ed in relation to the County population, volumes/capita com- parisons with other regional and State libraries, a capital im- provement summary including estimated construction costs, books and audio visual materials collections, and overall capital costs. Mr. Mayes expressed strong concern for the lack of adequate li- brary facilities in the Matoaca District, and it was generally agreed staff would meet with him to address his concerns. Discussion and questions ensued regarding the basis for the proposed expansion program, a mechanism for financing the pro- posed library expansions, consideration for implementing li- brary facilities in the more sparsely populated areas of the County, the feasibility of utilizing school library facilities or incorporating public library facilities into the school fac- ilities, consideration of the use of collegiate library facili- ties to meet the needs of high school students, the advantages and disadvantages of County-wide bookmobile services and past experiences with same, the types of materials purchased for school library facilities versus those materials purchased for public library facilities, etc. Mr. Ramsey noted staff is in discussions with the School Admin- istration regarding the utilization of school sites for poten- tial location and/or co-location of libraries and the Superin- tendent has indicated a willingness to examine this issue in conjunction with the school program. It was generally agreed to recess for five (5) minutes. Reconvening: 2.B. ALTERNATIVES FOR FINANCING WATER LINE EXTENSIONS Mr. Daniel stated for clarification that there have been state- ments made indicating the County has mismanaged its water system by allowing houses to be constructed where adequate water did not exist. He stated the State issues permits for wells and septic systems, and the State legislators have passed the legal mechanism that has allowed everyone of these indivi- duals to secure a home in the open market place with a well that failed. Mr. Sale explained that, as a result of numerous requests to extend public water to areas in which wells have failed and/or have become contaminated, the Board of Supervisors authorized staff to proceed with designs for the extension of public water to 10 areas, with Hunters Ridge Subdivision being the one sub- division with the most severe water quantity/quality problems. He stated the estimated cost for design ($300,000) was allocat- ed from the Capital Budget - Extensions to Developed Areas. He stated staff has considered various alternatives for financ- ing the extension of public water to the affected areas, which 87-788 alternatives included the following: Assessment District - total cost for providing the im- provement is paid for by the benefiting property owners through the mechanism of an assessment levied against their property based on factors such as front footage, acreage, or other. Partial Assessment - a portion of the cost for providing the improvement is paid for by the benefiting property owners. The balance of the cost could be paid by the County. 3. Total cost of the improvement to be funded by the County. He stated staff is recommending the partial assessment alterna- tive in which there would be assessments of either $2,200 for any subdivided lot within a recorded subdivision as of Septem- ber 1, 1987 or any owner-occupied acreage up to 12 acres as of September 1, 1987, with the acreage being adjusted for each assessment district based on the specific district require- ments. He stated other properties would be assessed on a per acre basis with a minimum assessment of $2,200 such that the total assessment would not exceed 1/2 the total cost of the project. Discussion and questions ensued relative to the recommended al- ternatives for financing the extension of public water; the advantages or disadvantages to the property owner/County of assessments levied against property based on the various alter- natives considered; the feasibility of the County assuming the total cost for extension of the water lines and how the County could, if possible, recoup its expenditures as connections occur; the implementation of mandatory connections in the af- fected areas; a mechanism to make "developer expense" more equitable; the severity of existing problems in the affected areas and the necessity for immediate action to remedy the sit- uation; the County's responsibility to ensure the health, safety and welfare of its citizens; concerns that approval of these extensions is a deviation of County policy and may remove the responsibility from the developer for the installation of utilities, constructing roads, etc.; whether or not contracts for connection to public water facilities have been obtained from residents in the affected areas; etc. It was generally agreed staff would proceed with obtaining con- tracts from residents in the affected areas to connect to public water facilities. 2.C. PRESENTATION OF LAKE GENITO FIRST PHASE REPORT Mr. Sale introduced Mr. Ron Snedegar, with Black & Veatch, Inc., Consulting Engineers, who presented a summary of the Lake Genito First Phase Report, highlighting the history of Lake Genito and its location; the joint development of a water im- poundment which would serve Powhatan, Amelia, Cumberland and Chesterfield Counties; the purpose and scope of the study; its findings and conclusions relative to population projections, water needs, water supply alternatives, benefits of the pro- ject, negative impacts, land use controls, organizational al- ternatives; etc. Discussion and questions ensued relative to the need for an additional participant to share the needs/expenses of the water impoundment, the results/recommendations of the study, water resources being made available for agricultural needs from the proposed lake, criteria set forth by Federal and State authori- ties for approval of reservoir construction, involvement of the Appomattox River Water Authority in the project, legislative approval for interjurisdictional representation, the criteria/ action required for proceeding with the Phase II Study and the creation of the Lake Genito Water Authority, etc. 87-789 It was generally agreed to recommend that the Lake Genito Com- mittee take the necessary steps to proceed with developing and contracting for a Phase Two engineering study, at a cost not to exceed funds already appropriated, and begin the process to es- tablish a Lake Genito Water Authority with the Counties of Chesterfield, Amelia, Powhatan and Cumberland and the Appomat- tox River Water Authority as initial members. 3. DINNER The Board recessed to travel to Hastings Seafood Restaurant for dinner. Reconvening: Mr. Daniel called the regularly scheduled meeting to order at the Courthouse at 7:00 p.m. (EDST). 4. INVOCATION Mr. Daniel introduced Dr. Glen D. Bohannon, Senior Pastor of Central Baptist Church, who gave the invocation. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF Mr. Daniel introduced Cub Scouts from Packs 861 and 865, spon- sored by Bon Air Presbyterian Church and Chester Moose Lodge, respectively, who were present observing the meeting. Members of the Scouts led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board ap- proved the minutes of September 23, 1987, as amended. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Dodd and Mrs. Girone. Abstention: Mr. Applegate, as he was absent from that meeting. 7. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS Mr. Ramsey welcomed Mr. Applegate upon his return from his re- cent hospitalization. Mr. Ramsey introduced Ms. Lori Crowder recorder of future Board meetings for Storer Cable; Mr. Frank Williams, representing the Richmond Times-Dispatch in the absence of Mr. Mike Williams; Ms. Bonnie Newman-Stanley, representing the Richmond News Leader in the absence of Mr. Hugh Robertson; and Ms. Marcia Crandall (not present), News Editor for the Midlothian Gazette. 8. BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS Mr. Applegate reported that the Richmond International Air- port's 60th birthday celebration is scheduled for Saturday, October 17, 1987, from 11:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m., on the grounds of the Airport; he stated all of the Central Virginia community is invited to attend and enjoy the festivities. Mr. Daniel introduced and welcomed Mrs. Mary McCracken and her 4th grade History class from J. G. Hening Elementary School who were present to observe the meeting. 87-790 9. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE ACTION, EMERGENCY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES IN THE ORDER OF PRESENTATION On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board re- numbered Item 10., Resolution Honoring The Richmond Metropoli- tan Chamber of Commerce on its 120th Anniversary and Declaring October 15, 1987 as "Metro Chamber Day" to Item 10.A.; added Item 10.B., Resolution Recognizing October 24, 1987 as "United Nations Day" in Chesterfield County; deleted Item 14.H.l., Set Date for Public Hearing to Consider Establishment of Assessment Districts; and adopted the agenda, as amended. Vote: Unanimous 10. RESOLUTIONS AND SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS 10.A. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE'S 120TH ANNI- VERSARY AND DECLARING OCTOBER 15, 1987 AS "METRO CHAMBER DAY" Mr. Masden introduced and welcomed Mr. William Shockley, Chair- man of the Chesterfield Business Council, and Ms. Vanessa Minter-Fegans, Vice President and Public Affairs Officer for the Richmond Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, who were pre- sent. He stated Chesterfield County is fortunate to enjoy a positive working relationship with both the Chamber and the Business Council. Mr. Shockley stated he has looked forward to celebrating this event not only as a recognition of the Chamber's past services provided throughout the region but also as the beginning for its future endeavors. He applauded Chesterfield County for its involvement and urged its continued support. He expressed ap- preciation for the participation and expertise shared by Mrs. Girone and Mr. Dodd and stated the Business Council will miss them as they conclude their tenure with the Board of Super- visors. On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Richmond Chamber of Commerce is celebrating the 120th Anniversary of its founding; and WHEREAS, A strong and enterprising business environment is the economic foundation of a growing community; and WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Richmond Chamber of Commerce has proved itself to be a strong, reasoned voice for regional co- operation of business interests and governments working for the best future of Metropolitan Richmond; and WHEREAS, It is recognized that these efforts are the pro- duct of generous support and labor of countless volunteers from area business. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its sincere ap- preciation and best wishes for all those who have shared their expertise, time and effort on behalf of their community through the 120 years of service by the Metropolitan Richmond Chamber of Commerce and does hereby declare October 15th as "METRO CHAMBER DAY" in Chesterfield County. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Daniel presented the executed resolution to Mr. Shockley and Ms. Minter-Fegans and expressed appreciation, on behalf of the community, for the efforts of the Metropolitan Richmond Chamber of Commerce. He stated the strength of any community lies with the strength of its commerce and, through the efforts of those involved with the Richmond Chamber of Commerce, the regional community has prospered and grown to make it the qual- 87-791 ity that people look to as a desirable place to reside and con- duct business. 10.B. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING OCTOBER 24, 1987 AS UNITED NATIONS DAY BY CHESTERFIELD COUNTY On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, United Nations Day is designated by the United Nations General Assembly each year to commemorate the founding of the Organization on October 24, 1945; and WHEREAS, On this occasion, we join with the peoples of the world in reaffirming our commitment to the principles upon which the United Nations was founded: international peace and security, respect for human rights and the promotion of social and economic cooperation among nations. United Nations Day also gives us the opportunity to examine our involvement in the world's problems and their solutions; and WHEREAS, Since the United Nations was founded 40 years ago, the world has changed dramatically with the addition of more than 100 nations to its membership. In this global com- munity, it is clear that the power to solve the world's pro- blems no longer lies solely in the hands of a few nations. Instead, all nations must work together to relieve the suffer- ing of millions, to halt nuclear proliferation and to promote economic development; and WHEREAS, Americans have made a great contribution to the creation and continuing work of the United Nations. As a part of our foreign policy, the United Nations is a channel through which the United States can take productive action for world peace and prosperity. Continued support for the United Nations can advance constructive goals that will benefit both the United States and the world. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors that Saturday, October 24, 1987 be pro- claimed as United Nations Day and that all citizens be urged to participate in programs and activities designed to increase understanding of the problems and potential of the United Nations and to develop ideas on ways to make the United Nations more effective. Ayes: Mr. Daniel, Mr. Mayes, Mr. Applegate and Mrs. Girone. Nays: Mr. Dodd. 11. HRARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED ~A~ERS OR CLAI~LS o MR. MAX GARDNER, YMCA, REGARDING "IN SCHOOL/BEFORE AND AFTER SCHOOL" PROGRAM Mr. Max Gardner, representing the YMCA of Greater Richmond, ex- pressed appreciation for the opportunity to address the Board concerning the "In School/Before and After School" program in- itiated this year by the YMCA in certain school facilities. He briefly explained the objectives and services provided by the program and addressed concerns regarding insurance issues and Requests for Proposals. When asked, approximately thirty (30) citizens stood indicating their support of the program. He stated the YMCA's primary objective is to serve the children and the community the best way possible and it does not intend to compete with private enterprise in the County. Mr. Daniel stated previous Board discussion of this issue did not specifically address the merits of the "In School/Before and After School" program but rather raised questions, which were directed to the School Board, regarding the procurement policy and insurance issues. He stated the Board had not yet 87-792 received a response from the School Board Chairman regarding these matters. It was generally agreed the Board would recess for several min- utes. Reconvening: 12. DEFERRED I~EMS 12.A. RICHMOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION - CITIZENS TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board nom- inated Mrs. Pat Szabo, representing the League of Women Voters, to serve on the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission Citizens Transportation Advisory Council, whose formal appoint- ment. will be made on October 28, 1987. Vote: Unanimous 12.B. YOUTH SERVICES COMMISSION Mr. Daniel requested the rules be suspended to permit the si- multaneous nomination/appointment of the youth representatives from the Bermuda and Dale Districts to serve on the Youth Ser- vices Commission. Mrs. Girone stated Ms. Stacy Tan resigned her position on the Commission and requested that Ms. Tan's resignation as well as the nomination/appointment of her re- placement be included. On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board su- spended the rules to accept Ms. Stacy Tan's resignation from the Youth Services Commission and permit the simultaneous nomination/appointment to fill vacancies existing on the Youth Services Commission. Vote: Unanimous On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board ac- cepted the resignation of Ms. Stacy Tan as the Midlothian Dis- trict youth representative from the Youth Services Commission effectively immediately; and nominated/appointed the following individuals to serve on the Youth Services Commission, from the respective districts as indicated, whose terms are effective immediately and will expire June 30, 1988: Mr. Nathan Diebel Mr. Chris Johnson Ms. Julie Deeter Ms. Amy Windom Bermuda Magisterial District Dale Magisterial District Dale Magisterial District Midlothian Magisterial District Vote: Unanimous 12.C. APPOMATTOX BASIN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board ap- pointed Mr. Mayes, representing the Board of Supervisors, and Mr. C. F. Currin, Jr., representing the business community, to serve on the Appomattox Basin Industrial Development Corpora- tion (ABIDCO), whose terms are effective immediately and will expire September 30, 1988. Vote: Unanimous 87-793 13. PUBLIC ~RARINGS 13.A. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL SECTIONS 10-22 TO 10-24 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED~ RELATING TO THE BURNING OF LEAVES AND ADD SAME WITH SECTIONS 10-25 TO 10-28 AND CONSIDER PROVIDING VACUUM SERVICE TO THE HANDICAPPED AT NO CHARGE Mr. Hammer stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the County Code, relating to the burning of leaves which readopts, on a permanent basis, the ordinance adopted on September 9, 1987 and to reaffirm Board approval of providing vacuum service to the handicapped at no charge. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the propos- ed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board reaffirmed its approval of providing vacuum service to the "physically" handicapped at no charge and adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL SECTIONS 10-22 TO 10-24 OF THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, 1978, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE BURNING OF LEAVES AND ADD SAME WITH SECTIONS 10-25 TO 10-28 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: (1) That Section 10-22, 10-23 and 10-24 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, 1978, as amended, is hereby repealed. (2) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended by adding the following sections which shall read as follows: Sec. 10-25. Leaf burning. a) It shall be unlawful for any person in the county to burn leaves from trees on property where they reside except: From March 15 through April 15 and November 15 through December 15 from 8:00 a.m. on Monday to noon on Friday. Any such burning shall not be within three hundred feet of any woodland or brushland unless it takes place between the hours of 4:00 p.m. and midnight. b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this ordi- nance, no person shall burn leaves within the bounds of any area designated and duly proclaimed by the board of supervisors as a "No Burn Area" and in which a county leaf pickup service shall be provided even during the periods when leaf burning under such subsection a) would be otherwise permitted. Sec. 10-26. Leaf pick-up service. In the event the board of supervisors shall choose to designate an area of the county a "No Burn Area" or to make leaf pickup service available in a designated area, it shall do so by describing such area by reference to commonly recognized roads, subdivisions and landmarks in a notice published once a week for two (2) successive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in such area and by posting such notice in at least five (5) public places within the area so designated. Sec. 10-27. Penalties. Any person violating any provision of this article shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be liable 87-794 to a fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each viola- tion. Vote: Unanimous 13.B. TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, ~1978, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING ARTICLE XII, RELATING TO REAL ESTATE TAX EXEMPTION FOR REHABILITATION OF DESIGNATED HISTORIC LANDMARKS Mr. Sale stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider an ordinance to amend the County Code, relating to real estate tax exemptions for rehabilitation of designated historic landmarks. He stated the tax adjust- ment, which will remain in effect for seven (7) years, shall be based on the increased assessed value resulting from the rehab- ilitation of a structure, and there will be no existing tax revenue lost if the ordinance were adopted. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the pro- posed ordinance. On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board adopted the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1978, AS AMENDED, BY ADDING ARTICLE XII RELATING TO REAL ESTATE TAX EXEMPTION FOR REHABILITATION OF DESIGNATED HISTORIC LANDMARKS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That the Code of the County of Chesterfield, 1978, as amended, is amended by adding to Chapter 8 a new Article XII as follows: Article XII. Real Estate Tax Exemption for Rehabilitation of Historic Landmarks Sec. 8-51. Rehabilitated Residential Real Estate (a) Exemption from taxation of real estate which has been substantially rehabilitated shall be granted subject to the following: (1) For purposes of this section, all residential improvements shall be approved by the Preservation CoF~ittee as appropriate interior or exterior improvements. (2) For the purpose of this section, any residential real estate which has been designated as a County Historical Landmark or is located in an area that has been designated a County Historical District shall be deemed to have been subs- tantially rehabilitated when a structure which is no less than fifty (50) years of age has been so improved as to increase the assessed value of the structure by no less than forty (40) per- cent without increasing the total square footage of such struc- ture by more than fifteen (15) percent. (3) The exemption provided in subsection (1) shall be an amount equal to the increase in assessed value resulting from the rehabilitation of the assessed residential structure, as determined by the county assessor; and this amount only shall be applicable to any subsequent assessment or reassess- ment. The exemption shall be limited to the first five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) of increased value. (4) The exemption shall run with the real e~tate for a period of seven (7) years. (b) Prior to beginning the rehabilitation, the owner of 87-795 any real estate meeting the criteria set forth in this section may apply to the county assessor for exemption on forms provid- ed by the county assessor. A fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) shall be paid by the owner to the county assessor for process- ing such application. (c) No property shall be eligible for such exemption un- less the appropriate building permits have been acquired, and the county assessor has verified that the rehabilitation indi- cated on the application has been completed and meets the re- quirements of this section. (d) The Board of Supervisors hereby authorizes the county assessor to implement any policies or procedures necessary to effectively implement this Article. Section 8-52. Rehabilitated Commercial Real Estate (a) Exemption from taxation of real estate which has been substantially rehabilitated shall be granted subject to the following: (1) For purposes of this section, all commercial im- provements shall be approved by the Preservation Committee as appropriate interior or exterior historic improvements. (2) For the purpose of this section, any commercial real estate which has been designated a County Historical Land- mark or is located in an area that has been designated a County Historical District shall be deemed to have been substantially rehabilitated when a structure which is no less than fifty (50) years of age has been so improved as to increase the assessed value of the structure by no less than sixty (60) percent with- out increasing the total square footage of such structure by more than fifteen (15) percent. (3) The exemption provided in subsection (1) shall be an amount equal to the increase in assessed value resulting from the rehabilitation of the assessed commercial structure, as determined by the county assessor; and this amount shall only be applicable to any subsequent assessment or reassess- ment. The exemption shall be limited to the first five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) of increased value. (4) The exemption shall run with the real estate for a period of seven (7) years. (b) Prior to beginning the rehabilitation, the owner of any real estate meeting the criteria set forth in this section may apply to the county assessor for exemption on forms provid- ed by the county assessor. A fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) shall be paid by the owner to the county assessor for process- ing the application. (c) No property shall be eligible for such exemption un- less the appropriate building permits have been acquired, and the county assessor has verified that the rehabilitation indi- cated on the application has been completed and meets the re- quirements of this section. (d) The Board of Supervisors hereby authorized the county assessor to implement any policies or procedures necessary to effectively implement this Article. The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective immediately. Vote: Unanimous 87-796 13.C. CONSIDER CONVEYANCE OF GROUND LEASE TO SIGNET LEASING AND FINANCIAL CORPORATION Mr. Micas stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider the conveyance of a Ground Lease to Signet Leasing and Financial Corporation. He stated as a part of the financing for the three new buildings (Data Processing, Human Services and Courts Building), the County will convey a lease to the lessor, Signet Leasing and Financial Corporation, and receive a lease-back in exchange. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the pro- posed conveyance. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board ap- proved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents to carry out, give effect to and consummate the Ground Lease between Chesterfield County and Signet Leasing and Financial Corporation for the leasing of by the County to the Corporation the sites for a Human Services Building, a Data Processing Building and a Courts Building and such buildings now or hereafter existing thereon. Vote: Unanimous 13.D. AMEND 1987-88 BUDGET FOR APPROPRIATION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW COURTS BUILDING Mr. Hammer stated this date and time had been advertised for a public hearing to consider amendment of the 1987-88 Budget for appropriation of additional construction funds for the new Courts Building. He stated, in accordance with State law, Board approval is required to appropriate $5,776,232 in con- struction funds and $398,140 for issuance expenses for the Courts Building project. No one came forward to speak in favor of or against the matter. On motion of the Board, the Board appropriated $5,776,232 in construction funds and $398,140 for issuance expenses for the Courts Building project, which funds are the net proceeds of the 1987 Lease/Purchase Refinancing Funds for the three (3) buildings ($4,566,661) and FY-88 estimated interest earnings ($1,607,711); and further, the Board appropriated $18,803,339 to defease the 1985 lease purchase certificates. Vote: Unanimous 14. NEW BUSINE$S 14.A. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER LEASE OF HANGAR/ OFFICE BUILDING TO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board set the date of October 28, 1987, at 9:00 a.m., for a public hear- ing to consider the lease of an aircraft hangar and office facility at the Chesterfield County Airport to the Virginia Department of State Police for a period of five (5) years with a renewal provision. Vote: Unanimous 14.B. NURSING HOME LAUNDRY RENOVATIONS Mr. Masden stated renovation and replacement of the laundry facility and equipment, estimated at a cost of approximately $90,000, was included in the 1986-87 budget for the Nursing Home, based upon the assumption that the Nursing Home mainten- ance staff could perform a substantial portion of the work 87-797 using subcontractors. He stated, however, upon close inspec- tion, the County's construction coordinator determined there were significant deficiencies (i.e., structural deterioration, new utility connections requiring conversion from electricity to natural gas, changes in venting in the ceiling and enlarged drainage capacity, etc.) and that it would not be feasible for Nursing Home maintenance staff to perform these modifications. He stated, in addition to the current appropriation of $90,000, an additional appropriation of $67,000 from the Nursing Home C~sh Reserve Fund is requested to cover the total cost. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents awarding a contract to New Alpha Construc- tion Company in the amount of $60,747 for the renovation con- tract for the laundry facility and appropriated an additional $67,000 from the Nursing Home Cash Reserve Fund to cover the total cost of the project ($157,000). (It is noted an estimated $90,000 appropriation was included in the 1986-87 Budget for this project.) Vote: Unanimous 14.C. JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR HUMAN SERVICES BUILDING Mr. Masden stated Board approval is requested to authorize Chesterfield Vocational Services to provide janitorial services in the Human Services Building. Mr. Ramsey introduced Mr. Jacob Mast, Jr., and Mr. Manton Kibler, Administrator and Controller, respectively, for the Nursing Home. On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board accept- ed funds in the amount of $12,000 from the Department of Rehab- ilitative Services to establish training positions for mentally retarded individuals; and transferred two (2) full-time posi- tions and associated funds, in the amount of $25,100, from the Department of General Services budget to the Department of Mental Health/Mental Retardation budget to provide maintenance for the Human Services Building for the balance of FY 87-88. (It is noted this program will be evaluated at the end of one year trial period to determine its feasibility for continua- tion.) Vote: Unanimous 14.D. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF LOST COUPONS FOR CERTAIN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BONDS Mr. Hammer stated that Crestar Bank, a fiduciary for certain holders of County bonds, has indicated its loss of five (5) coupons from bonds purchased from the 1980 Chesterfield County Public Improvement Issue and ten (10) coupons from the 1980 General Obligation Sewer Bond Issue and has requested that Central Fidelity Bank, as paying agent for certain of the County's bonds, pay the coupons, which are valued at $152.50 each and were due January 1, 1987. When asked, Mr. Micas stated the County is protected against duplicate payment of the coupons. On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Dodd, the Board ap- proved and authorized Central Fidelity Bank to pay fifteen (15) lost coupons, valued at $152.50 each (five (5) coupons from bonds purchased from the 1980 Chesterfield County Public Im- provement Issue and ten (10) coupons from the 1980 General Obligation Sewer Bond Issue), based on the affidavit of loss and an unlimited liability bond indemnifying the County against 87-798 duplicate payment on the bonds. (It is noted the County Treasurer has reviewed this request and concurs.) Vote: Unanimous 14.E. CONSENT ITEMS 14.E.1. STATE ROAD ACCEPTANCE This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his ex- amination of South Ridge Drive and South Ridge Circle in Plum Creek, Section Two, Clover Hill District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that South Ridge Drive and South Ridge Circle in Plum Creek, Section Two, Clover Hill District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, South Ridge Drive, beginning at existing South Ridge Drive, State Route 3590, Plum Creek, Section 1, and going northerly 0.20 mile to the intersection with South Ridge Circle, then going northeasterly 0.04 mile to end at the pro- posed tie in with South Ridge Drive, South Ridge, Section A; and South Ridge Circle, beginning at South Ridge Drive and going northwesterly 0.03 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 49 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors gua- rantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Plum Creek is recorded as follows: Section Two. Plat Book 51, Page 71, December 2, 1985. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his ex- amination of Ashton Woods Drive, Ashton Woods Court, Peach Grove Road and Parkerstown Road in Ashton Woods North, Section A, Dale District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Ashton Woods Drive, Ashton Woods Court, Peach Grove Road and Parkerstown Road in Ashton Woods North, Section A, Dale District, be and they here- by are established as public roads. And be it further resolved that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Ashton Woods Drive, beginning at the inter- section with Salem Church Road, State Route 642, and running easterly 0.03 mile to the intersection with Ashton Woods Court, then continuing easterly 0.05 mile to the intersection with Peach Grove Road, then continuing easterly 0.02 mile to tie into proposed Ashton Woods Drive, Ashton Woods North, Section B; Ashton Woods Court, beginning at the intersection with Ash- ton Woods Drive and running southerly 0.04 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Peach Grove Road, beginning at the intersection with Ashton Woods Drive and running northwesterly 0.10 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. Again, Peach Grove Road, beginning at the intersection with Ashton Woods Drive and running southerly 0.16 87-799 mile to the intersection with Parkerstown Road, then continuing southerly 0.04 mile to end in a temporary turnaround; and Parkerstown Road, beginning at the intersection with Peach Grove Road and running easterly 0.05 mile to end in a cul-de- sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 50 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors gua- rantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads, except Ashton Woods Drive which has a variable 50' to 70' right-of-way. This section of Ashton Woods North is recorded as follows: Section A. Plat Book 52, Page 94, May 14, 1986. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his ex- amination of Hunters Landing Drive, Hunters Landing Court, Poachers Run, Bexwood Drive, Bexwood Court, Snare Court, Pursuit Court and Poachers Court in Hunters Landing, Sections 1, 2 and 3, Matoaca District. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Hunters Landing Drive, Hunters Landing Court, Poachers Run, Bexwood Drive, Bexwood Court, Snare Court, Pursuit Court and Poachers Court in Hunters Landing, Sections 1, 2 and 3, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Hunters Landing Drive, beginning at the in- tersection with Genito Road, State Route 604, and going south- westerly 0.18 mile to the intersection with Poachers Run, then continuing southwesterly 0.06 mile to the intersection with Hunters Landing Court, then going southerly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Hunters Landing Court, beginning at the inter- section with Hunters Landing Drive and going southeasterly 0.06 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Poachers Run, beginning at the intersection with Hunters Landing Drive and going southeasterly 0.09 mile to the intersection with Bexwood Drive, then going northeasterly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Poachers Court, then continuing northeasterly 0.04 mile to end in a cul- de-sac; Poachers Court, beginning at the intersection with Poachers Run and going northwesterly 0.08 mile to end in a cul- de-sac; Bexwood Drive, beginning at the intersection with Poachers Run and going southerly 0.08 mile to the intersection with Pursuit Court, then continuing southwesterly 0.11 mile to the intersection with Snare Court, then continuing southwester- ly 0.05 mile to end with proposed Bexwood Drive, Great Oaks, Section 5; Pursuit Court, beginning at the intersection with Bexwood Drive and going southeasterly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; Snare Court, beginning at the intersection with Bexwood Drive and going westerly 0.07 mile to end in a cul-de- sac; and Bexwood Court, beginning at the intersection with Bexwood Drive and going northeasterly 0.10 mile to end in a cul-de-sac. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 121 lots. 87-800 And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors gua- rantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads except Hunters Landing Drive which has a variable width 50' to 80' right-of-way. These sections of Hunters Landing are recorded as follows: Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Plat Book 50, Pages 4 & 5, July 19, 1985. Plat Book 50, Pages 68 & 69, September 4, 1985. Plat Book 50, Page 70, September 4, 1985. Vote: Unanimous This day the County Environmental Engineer, in accordance with directions from this Board, made report in writing upon his ex- amination of Alberta Road, East Alberta Court, Blossomwood Road and Blossomwood Circle in Sunnybrook, Section 7, Matoaca Dis- trict. Upon consideration whereof, and on motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, it is resolved that Alberta Road, East Alberta Court, Blossomwood Road and Blossomwood Circle in Sunnybrook, Section 7, Matoaca District, be and they hereby are established as public roads. And be it further resolved, that the Virginia Department of Transportation, be and it hereby is requested to take into the Secondary System, Alberta Road, beginning at existing Alberta Road, State Route 888, and going northwesterly 0.01 mile to in- tersection with East Alberta Court, then continuing northerly 0.19 mile to the intersection with Blossomwood Road, then con- tinuing northeasterly 0.11 mile to end in a cul-de-sac; East Alberta Court, beginning at the intersection with Alberta Road and going northeasterly 0.03 mile to end at proposed East Alberta Court, Sunnybrook, Section 8; Blossomwood Road, beginn- ing at Alberta Road and going easterly 0.05 mile to the inter- section with Blossomwood Circle, then continuing easterly 0.06 mile to end at the tie-in with proposed Blossomwood Road, Sunnybrook, Section 6; and Blossomwood Circle, beginning at the intersection with Blossomwood Road, and going southerly 0.02 mile to end at the tie-in with proposed Blossomwood Circle, Sunnybrook, Section 8. This request is inclusive of the adjacent slope, sight distance and designated Virginia Department of Transportation drainage easements. These roads serve 43 lots. And be it further resolved, that the Board of Supervisors gua- rantees to the Virginia Department of Transportation a 50' right-of-way for all of these roads. This section of Sunnybrook is recorded as follows: Section 7. Plat Book 52, Page 4, January 15, 1986. Vote: Unanimous 14.E.2. CHANGES IN STATE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, construction of Route 634, Project 20-0634-5301- 002-501 has been constructed and approved by the State Highway Commissioner, has changes in the Secondary System as the roads so altered; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a portion of old location of Route 634, i.e., Section 1 shown in yellow on the 87-801 sketch titled, "Changes in the Secondary System Due to Reloca- tion and Construction on Route 634, Project 20-0634-5301-002- 501", dated at Richmond, Virginia, October 22, 1986, a total distance of 0.09 mile, does not serve a public need and is to be discontinued from the Secondary System of State Highway pur- suant to Section 33.1-150 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, amended; AND FURTHER, that portion of old location of Route 634, i.e., Section 2 shown in yellow on the sketch titled, "Changes in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 634, Project 20-0634-5301-002-501", dated at Richmond, Virginia, October 22, 1986, a total distance of 0.07 mile, does not serve a public need and is to be discontinued from the Secondary System of State Highway pursuant to Section 33.1-150 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, amended; AND FURTHER, that portion of old location of Route 692, i.e., Section 3 shown in yellow on the sketch titled, "Changes in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 634, Project 20-0634-5301-002-501", dated at Richmond, Virginia, October 22, 1986, a total distance of 0.02 mile, does not serve a public need and is to be discontinued from the Secondary System of State Highway pursuant to Section 33.1-150 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, amended; AND FURTHER, that portion of old location of Route 634, i.e., Section 4 shown in yellow on the sketch titled, "Changes in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 634, Project 20-0634-5301-002-501", dated at Richmond, Virginia, October 22, 1986, a total distance of 0.12 mile, does not serve a public need and is to be discontinued from the Secondary System of State Highway pursuant to Section 33.1-150 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, amended; AND FURTHER, that portion of Secondary Route 634, i.e., Section 5 as shown in red on the sketch titled, "Changes in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 634, Project 20-0634-5301-002-501", dated at Richmond, Vir- ginia, October 22, 1986, a total distance of 0.10 mile, be and hereby is added to the Secondary System of State Highway pur- suant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, amended; AND FURTHER, that portion of Secondary Route 634, i.e., Section 6 as shown in red on the sketch titled, "Changes in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 634, Project 20-0634-5301-002-501", dated at Richmond, Vir- ginia, October 22, 1986, a total distance of 0.05 mile, be and hereby is added to the Secondary System of State Highway pur- suant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, amended; AND FURTHER, that portion of Secondary Route 634, i.e., Section 7 as shown in red on the sketch titled, "Changes in the Secondary System Due to Relocation and Construction on Route 634, Project 20-0634-5301-002-501", dated at Richmond, Vir- ginia, October 22, 1986, a total distance of 0.12 mile, be and hereby is added to the Secondary System of State Highway pur- suant to Section 33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, amended. Vote: Unanimous 14.E.3. REQUESTS FOR BINGO/RAFFLE PERMITS On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approved requests for bingo and/or raffle permits for the foll- owing organizations for the calendar year 1987: 87-802 Vote: Unanimous Brandermill Woman's Club Clover Hill Elementary PTA 14.E.4. CONFIRMATION OF BOARD RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING SIGNET BANK/VIRGINIA FOR SPONSORSHIP OF 1987 RAINBOW OF THE ARTS FESTIVAL On motion of the Board, the Board reaffirmed and adopted the following resolution, as one member of the Board was not present at the September 23, 1987 meeting: WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department functions to positively effect the quality of life in Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, the provision of high quality special events represents an important component of the Department's services; and WHEREAS, the 1987 Rainbow of Arts represents an enjoyable, family oriented celebration of the arts, as well as a tribute to the positive impact the arts have on our lives and commun- ity; and WHEREAS, Signet Bank/Virginia has chosen to provide signi- ficant support for this annual community wide event. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors does hereby recognize Signet Bank/Virginia for its generous contribution to the event and to the citizens of Chesterfield County. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby express its sincere appreciation and gratitude to Signet Bank/Virginia for its good will and community concern. Vote: Unanimous 14.F. APPOINTMENTS 14.F.1. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mrs. Girone, the Board de- ferred nomination of a replacement for Mr. Robert Goyne to serve on the Industrial Development Authority until a later date. Vote: Unanimous Mr. Applegate suggested that Mr. Dodd consider serving in that capacity upon his retirement from the Board of Supervisors or that the nomination be deferred until the newly elected Bermuda District Supervisor is on board. 14.F.2. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY MUSEUM COMMITTEE On motion of Mr. Mayes, seconded Mr. Dodd, the Board nominated the following persons to serve on the Chesterfield County Museum Committee, whose formal appointments will be made Octo- ber 28, 1987: Mrs. Marguerite Christian Mr. Marvin Reed Mrs. Mary Vaden Vote: Unanimous 87-803 14.G. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ITEMS 14.G.1. STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION COST APPROVALS On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board approved the street light installation cost approvals for the following locations, which funds are to be expended from the appropriate District Street Light Fund as indicated: Intersection of Dakins Drive and Vickilee Road ($514.00) - Clover Hill District; Intersection of Kingsland Road and Cochise Trail ($526.24) - Dale District. Vote: Unanimous 14.G.2. STREET LIGHT REQUESTS On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed the installation of street lights at the following loca- tions, with funds to be expended from the Bermuda District Street Light Fund: 1. Intersection of Walnut Drive and Tranor Avenue, and 2. Intersection of Rivermont Road and Spruce Avenue. Vote: Unanimous 14.G.3. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS AND AWARDING OF CONTRACT FOR IN- STALLATION OF GRAND SUMMIT DRAINAGE PROJECT On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents awarding contracts to Tarmac-Lonestar, Inc., in the amount of $22,086 to supply materials and Inter- state Construction Corp., in the amount of $115,987.70, for construction of the Grand Summit Drainage Project; and appro- priated $140,000 from the Miscellaneous Drainage Capital Im- provement Account for said project. Vote: Unanimous 14.G.4. ROUTE 10/ROUTE 1 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Route 10/Route 1 intersection in Chester is one of the County's most congested intersections; and WHEREAS, the County has provided $1,225,000 for the im- provement of this intersection; and WHEREAS, Interstate Construction Corporation has submitted the low bid to the Virginia Department of Transportation for the improvement of this intersection; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has agreed to absorb all project costs above the $1,225,000 provid- ed by the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Super- visors of Chesterfield County hereby approves Interstate's bid. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board expresses its deep- est appreciation to the Virginia Department of Transportation 87-804 for their cooperation in accelerating the construction of this project. Vote: Unanimous 14.G.5. TURN LANE ALONG MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Walton Park Community Association has re- quested a right turn lane along eastbound Route 60 at its in- tersection with Walton Park Road; and WHEREAS, this right turn lane will provide safer turning movements at the intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Super- visors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to construct a right turn lane, not to exceed $40,000, along east- bound Route 60 at its intersection with Walton Park Road; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors ap- propriates $10,000 from the Midlothian District Three Cent Road Fund and requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to transfer $30,000 from the Le Gordon Drive revenue sharing pro- ject to fund this right turn lane. Vote: Unanimous 14.G.6. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR RUFFIN MILL ROAD PLAN AMENDMENT On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board set the date of December 9, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider amendment to the Eastern Area Land Use and Transporta- tion Plan in the Ruffin Mill Road area. Vote: Unanimous 14.G.7. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER RESTRICTION OF THROUGH TRUCK TRAFFIC ON WALTON PARK ROAD, WATCH HILL ROAD AND QUEENSGATE ROAD On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board set the date of November 12, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider restriction of through truck traffic on Walton Park Road, Watch Hill Road and Queensgate Road. Vote: Unanimous 14.G.8. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO NORTH- ERN AREA LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN AS IT RELATES TO ALVERSER/OLD BUCKINGHAM ROAD On motion of Mrs. Girone, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board set the date of November 12, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for a public hearing to consider an amendment to the Northern Area Land Use and Transportation Plan as it relates to the Alverser Drive/Old Buckingham Road area. Vote: Unanimous 14.G.9. CONSIDER RICHMOND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMIS- SION'S LEGISLATIVE PACKET On motion of Mr. Daniel, seconded by Mr. Applegate, the Board approved the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission 87-805 1988 Legislative Packet as submitted, a copy of which is filed with the papers of this Board. Vote: Unanimous 14.H. UTILITIES ITEMS 14.H.2. LAKE GENITO RESOLUTION Mr. Sale stated on September 1, 1987, the Lake Genito Study Committee met to discuss the results of a preliminary Engineer- ing study performed on the proposed Lake Genito reservoir facility and to examine various organizational structures available to acquire, construct and operate the facility. He stated, as a result of the meeting, the Study Committee unani- mously voted to have the governing bodies of each participating jurisdiction consider the adoption of a resolution which would (1) permit the Committee to develop and contract for a Phase Two engineering study, at a cost not to exceed funds already appropriated, and (2) begin the process to establish a Lake Genito Water Authority with the Counties of Chesterfield, Amelia, Powhatan and Cumberland and the Appomattox River Water Authority as initial members. On motion of the Board, the following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the Counties of Chesterfield, Powhatan, Amelia, and Cumberland ("PACC"), have established the Lake Genito Study Committee ("Committee") to investigate the feasibility of jointly developing and utilizing Lake Genito on the Appomattox River as a water supply source; and WHEREAS, PACC, by action of their respective Boards of Supervisors, previously retained Black & Veatch, Inc. ("engi- neer'') to conduct an initial investigation into the feasibility of developing Lake Genito as a long-range water supply source for PACC and to recommend an organizational structure for the development of Lake Genito; and WHEREAS, the engineer has prepared a report based on its initial investigation, and submitted the report to the Commit- tee for its review; and WHEREAS, upon consideration of the report the committee passed a resolution recommending that the governing bodies of each jurisdiction comprising PACC take certain action to ensure further progress toward the eventual development of Lake Genito which action is described in this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, that, upon the recommendation of the Lake Genito Study Committee, the Board authorizes the County, through its representatives on the Lake Genito Study Committee, to take the following action in conjunction with the other PACC .jurisdictions: 1. To take all necessary action to create a Lake Genito Water Authority which will initially be composed of the PACC jurisdictions and the Appomattox River Water Authority as mem- bers. 2. To take all action necessary to develop, negotiate and contract for the second phase of the Lake Genito engineer- ing study, at a cost not to exceed the amount already appro- priated by PACC for the second phase. Vote: Unanimous 14.H.3. CONSENT ITEMS 14.H.3.a. WATER AND SEWER CONTRACT FOR IRONBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT COLLECTORS, PHASE II On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board 87-806 approved and authorized the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents for the following water and sewer contract: U87-169M for Ironbridge Development Collectors, Phase II. Developer: Ironbridge Development Company Contractor: William M. Harmon Contractors Total Contract Cost: Total Estimated County Cost: water $14,787.00 (Refund through connection fees) sewer $ 4,833.90 Estimated Developer Cost: Number of Connections: Future Connections Code: 5N-2511-997 $222,292.13 $ 19,620.90 $202,671.23 Vote: Unanimous 14.H.3.b. CONTRACT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A TOXIC REDUCTION EVALUA- TION PLAN FOR THE FALLING CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents awarding the contract for Toxic Reduction Evaluation Plan development to E. A. Engineering, Science and Technology, Inc., in the amount of $32,996.00, for the Falling Creek Treatment Plant, as required by the recently reissued National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit (NPDES), for the purpose of identifying and eliminating the source of toxicity in the effluent. (It is noted the fee for developing the plan will be on a time and material basis not to exceed $33,000 and funds are avail- able within the Falling Creek Plant operating budget.) Vote: Unanimous 14.H.3.c. CONSIDER REQUEST FROM COMMONWEALTH GAS SERVICES, INC. FOR A 10 FOOT EASEMENT ON COUNTY PROPERTY On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed and authorized the County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board to execute an agreement granting a 10' easement on County property to Commonwealth Gas Services, Inc., to install a main within an existing Commonwealth Gas Pipeline easement to serve the Chesterfield Industrial Park. Vote: Unanimous 14.H.3.d. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR ENCROACHMENT ON COUNTY EASEMENT FROM HENRY P. WORTH, JR. IN BAYPORT LANDING On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed the encroachment of a proposed deck on an existing County temporary construction easement for Mr. Henry P. Worth, Jr., across Lot 32, Bayport Landing, subject to the applicant sign- ing a license agreement drafted by the County Attorney that will include the following conditions: That within 30 days notice by the County, Permittee shall remove said improvements from the temporary construction easement at his expense. Should the Permittee fail to perform in accordance with condition no. 1 within the 30 days required, the County, at its option, shall have the improvements removed at Per- mittee's expense and bill the Permittee for the cost of removing the improvements; alternatively, the County may allow the improvements to remain in which event the Per- mittee shall be responsible for paying to the County any increased construction costs caused by the presence of the improvements. Failure to pay said bill or increased con- 87-807 struction cost shall constitute a lien on the subject real estate, in the amount of the bill or cost. The County shall not be required to replace said improve- ments, compensate the Permittee for the removal of same, or otherwise restore the property to its improved condi- tion. Vote: Unanimous 14.H.3.e. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG BELMONT ROAD AND TURNER ROAD FROM GFI EQUITY PARTNERS On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 15' strip of land along Belmont Road and a 20' strip of land along Turner Road from GFI Equity Partners, L.P., A Virginia Limited Partnership. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 14.H.3.f. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG STATE ROUTE 10 FROM BNE LAND AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 12.07' strip of land along State Route 10 from BNE Land and Development Company. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 14.H.3.~. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG LEE STREET FROM MR. AND MRS. RICHARD M. ALLEN On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 20' strip of land along Lee Street from Mr. Richard M. Allen and Mrs. Joan D. Allen. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 14.H.3.h. DEED OF DEDICATION ALONG SECOND BRANCH ROAD AND RIVER ROAD FROM MR. AND MRS. ZANE G. DAVIS On motion of Mr. Dodd, seconded by Mr. Mayes, the Board approv- ed and authorized the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed of dedication accepting, on behalf of the County, the conveyance of a 10' strip of land along Second Branch Road and River Road from Mr. Zane G. Davis and Mrs. Carmen G. Davis. (A copy of the plat is filed with the papers of this Board.) Vote: Unanimous 14.H.4. REPORTS Mr. Sale presented the Board with a report on the developer water and sewer contracts executed by the County Administrator. 87-808 14.I. REPORTS Mr. Ramsey presented the Board with a status report on the Gen- eral Fund Contingency Account, General Fund Balance, Road Re- serve Funds, District Road and Street Light Funds, Lease Pur- chases, School Literary Loans and School Board Agenda, the 1986-1987 Directory of Youth Services for Chesterfield County and the Annual Report for 1986-87 on the Mutual Support Agree- ment between Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia State University, John Tyler Community College and Chesterfield County. Mr. Ramsey stated the Virginia Department of Transportation has formally notified the County of the acceptance of the following roads into the State Secondary System: ADDITIONS LENGTH CRANBROOK Route 3425 (Cranbeck Terrace) - From Route 674 to an east cul-de-sac 0.14 Mi. Route 3426 (Cranbeck Circle) - From Route 3325 to a north cul-de-sac 0.08 Mi. Route 3427 (Cranbeck Court) - From Route 3326 to a northeast cul-de-sac 0.08 Mi. SALISBURY - SOUTHWELL Route 3770 (Southwell Court) - From Route 714 to a northeast cul-de-sac Route 3771 (Southwell Place) - From Route 3770 to a southeast cul-de-sac 0.16 Mi. 0.03 Mi. SALISBURY - FOUNTAIN HEAD Route 3770 (Southwell Terrace) - From Route 714 to a west cul-de-sac Route 3772 (Fulford Court) - From Route 714 to a west cul-de-sac 0.20 Mi. 0.04 Mi. MONACAN HILLS - SECTION 2 Route 3780 (Westcreek Drive) - From Route 720 to 0.05 mile north of Route 3787 Route 3781 (South Wedgemont Drive) - From Route 3780 to 0.03 mile west of Route 3780 Route 3782 (Briarcrest Drive) - From Route 3780 to a northwest cul-de-sac Route 3783 (Briarhurst Drive) - From Route 3780 to 0.05 mile east of Route 3780 Route 3784 (North Wedgemont Drive) - From Route 3780 to 0.02 mile west of Route 3780 Route 3785 (Eastcliff Drive) - From Route 3780 to an east cul-de-sac Route 3786 (Westcreek Court) - From Route 3780 to a northwest cul-de-sac Route 3787 (Westcreek Circle) - From Route 3780 to an east cul-de-sac 0.14 Mi. 0.03 Mi. 0.10 Mi. 0.05 Mi. 0.02 Mi. 0.08 Mi. 0.10 Mi. 0.06 Mi. 87-809 ADDITIONS SALEM WOODS - SECTIONS F, G, & A Route 1903 (Chanson Road) - From 0.08 mile southeast of Route 642 to Route 3702 Route 3702 (Ladue Road) - From Route 3700 to Route 1905 Route 3704 (Chipping Drive) - From Route 3700 to Route 3702 LENGTH 0.04 Mi. 0.36 Mi. 0.22 Mi. SALISBURY - CASTLEFORD & GALLOWAY SECTIONS Route 902 (West Salisbury Road) - From Route 1338 to 0.03 mile west of Route 3792 Route 3790 (Galloway Terrace) - From Route 902 to a north cul-de-sac Route 3791 (Galloway Court) - From Route 3790 to a northeast cul-de-sac Route 3792 (Castleford Terrace) - From Route 3790 to a north cul-de-sac Route 3793 (Castleford Drive) - From Route 3792 to a west cul-de-sac Route 3794 (Castleford Court) - From Route 3792 to a west cul-de-sac 0.35 Mi. 0.22 Mi. 0.18 Mi. 0.28 Mi. 0.20 Mi. 0.25 Mi. SHENANDOAH HILLS - SECTION C-2 Route 2100 (Redbridge Road) - From 0.14 mile east of Route 2890 to 0.05 mile east of Route 2854 Route 2853 (Redbridge Terrace) - From Route 2100 to a north cul-de-sac Route 2854 (Redbridge Circle) - From Route 2100 to a north cul-de-sac 0.18 Mi. 0.07 Mi. 0.04 Mi. MIDLOTHIAN VILLAGE - PHASE I & II Route 951 (Village Mill Drive) - From Route 60 to 0.24 mile southwest of Route 60 0.24 Mi. 15. ADJOURNMENT On motion of Mr. Applegate, seconded by Mr. adjourned at 8:00 p.m. (EDST) until 9:00 a.m. 28, 1987. Vote: Unanimous Mayes, the Board (EDST) on October Lane B Ra~se~~ County Administrator Harry G./Daniel Chairma.~' 87-810