The URL can be used to link to this page

09/25/74 Packet... ,.'. ,'_~ ~,: :~ ',' , ..... ~[ * :'" :I'..:"'.' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - -~'~: ....... ~'~ ~ Case No. ' " ~' , ~v~~~f Zon~n~ appeals Fee ~ecelpt No. APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD 0F SUPERFISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FOLLOWING INFORM~TION SHALL BE TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL E~PLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) REZONING: From ~': ' ( ) To ~ '~ ~ Type of use(s~ proposed: - ' ~ ' ~. ( ) B) C ........... ONDITIONAL USE: c) VA~ A) B) D) E) H) NAME OF APPLICANT: MAILING ADDRESS: OCCUR: MAILI~ ~ '-.~ ~" %:..~, , v..::: ...... F PHONE NO.: N~E OP PEHSON TO ~E NOTIFIED ~ OTHER ~HAN ~PPLIC~NT ~ND/OR PROPERTY O~NER: ~.. ~ ~ ,_..~ ...... ADDRESS: -' ~; ~ .~ ~,~ ..... .,. .... I) --TELEPHONE NO.: IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A ~ of pending contract or option agreement shall b~ attached hereto and made a part of this application.) A) C) ~) ~) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) MAGISTERIAL~DISTRICT - ~ ' B) TAX MAP NO.__ SEC. NO. ~:~?~ D) SUBDiVISI09 NO E) BLOCK LOT OR P~ .~ G) S .... NO. TREET ADDRESS -- SOURCE OF TITLE F0-~L PROPERTIES INVOLVED DE~D Book ,,.,,~_:, PAGE !~:i~ '.~.~ ..... STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: STATE HOW THIS RE T ,~ 'QUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT~ SPECIAL EXCEPTION~ CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: ,, A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S):-------- c) EXIS~ D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF~sT: ,,.,~ GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS TNE ROAD OR ~IG~WAY AND FACIN~ ?~E PROPERTY ~ND AN~ OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGH~-O~-W~ FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERT AT OR ~TH~N 100 FEET OF ~HE INTE Y AFfeCTED IS SITUATED OR HIGHWAYS_ AT OR "~" .... '~ ........ RSECTION OF ANY ~WO OR MORE ~c · ~ , ~uau ~Iu~T-o~-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS 0F ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following lnforma~lo~ MUST BE obtalned by the appllcant from the offlce of the Count~--A-~sessor~ Room 213). A) B) C) D) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: ~4AILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: , ~.~, LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK :-~ S~CTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER,S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: -~, TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL' . ~SUBD. NAME: BL~CK: SECTION: BLOCK: ,~u.~SECTiON: ..... SUBD. NAME: BLOCN: _SECTZON: -2- K) N) E) F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: ..... LOT or PARCEL:-7--- PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ~'MILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: L) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TA~ MAP NO.; LOT or PARCEL: · I) J) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL.--~ PROPERTY OWNER,S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS~ TAX ~AP NO.~ LOT or PARCEL:-~ PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEl: -- PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME~ MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: ' PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL:------~ BLOCK: SUBD. NAME: SECTION: .L SUBD. NAME: SECTION: BLOCK: NAME: SECTION: SUBD. NAME; SECTION: BLOCK: __SECTION: SUB~ SECTION: SUB~ __BLOCK:--~-7~ SECTION: SUBD. ~ SECTION: SUBD. N~ME: BLOCK: " ~SECTt~N: ,., SUB~[-~ NAME: '" s~~ 'SECTIO--ffW FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- lO) ii) i2) 13) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT~ ROOM 307. CHECK OR MONEY RDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: 0 ~ TREASURER~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL° ENCLOSE WITH TItIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS° NOTE: 14) INCOMPLETE APPLICATION£ MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE Sm~ ~ ~ I~TEMF.',NTS A?~D THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: · ~'~ ~ ~ AGENT ~" (Name of person other than~ but aetlng for the applicant~ filllng out at1 or a part of this appli- cation) (Same name as used in Item 2-A, Page 1 ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ~,,. FORE ME THIS /~ DAY OF -a~.~ MY COMMISSION EXPIRE~~/ ~~c-, /~-- , 197L_. ,197 . NOTARY .,,,,,.~:>,,,,;.,,.. BOARD OF SUPERViSOR~~ ' ..... :..:. CFt£STE RFI ELD, ,~,~UN .; :::C ...... . . ~ ~,::., , .... .',~ ~ °~q~[~"~~'"Appeals Fee Receip~ No. APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED Type of use(sY~ropo'~ed:~ ]~) D) E) G) A) c) F) H) NAME OF APPLICANT: ~Z- MAILING ADDRESS: . NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERm~ OCCUR:~~,~ ~- L,/.,_. ' MAILIN~ . ~ u~ w~l±uH THIS REQfdEST W~ PROPERTY OWNER: _ .. _ ADDRESS: u~ THAN APPLICANT AND/OR IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A ~op~ of pending contract or option agreement shal____~l b_~e attached hereto and made a part of this application.) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION ., (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT/~/..)/n~,~ B) T~X M SEC. NO. _--- --- _ ~ - AP NO. /~- LOT 0 ...... ~ D) SUBDIVISION NO. _,-_:: 4/ ~i ) a raSCaL NO, ~.~ __. ~ ~-_= ~' m) ~LOCK NO '' - SOURCE OF TITL~ ~ --;- - u/ ~Ta~T ADDRESS ~_[.,a ~. ~ ~-~ PAGE ~ ~ ~ ~,un arum F'OPERTIES INVOLVED DE~-~F ~tC '~/ 5. STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT~ SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): =. B) EX/STING STRUCTURE(S)~ C) EXIS~~ .... D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF~ GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAy OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the Count~'Assessor~ Room 213)· A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ~.~_ , :- ~ K: ~ SECTION: B) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME:_..~~~2 TAX MAP NO.: /~'- ~ f ,; SU . __ ' LOT or PARCEL_ /~ ._~ _BLOCK: ~OPERTY OWNER' NA ~ LOT or PARCEL: .... ! BLOCK- c) D) PROPERTY OWNER,S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL' SECTION: _ SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: -2- E) F) G) H) I) J) K) L) M) N) PROPERTY OWNER,S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL..-7---~ PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL:-~ PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL:--~ PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL-~ PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING A ~ DDR~SS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEE: -- BLOCK': SUBD. NAME: SECTION: BLOCK: SUBD. NAME: SECTION: ~. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION~ SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: .... SECTION: ,,_SUBD. NAME~ BLOCK: SECTION: BLOCK: SUB~ SECTION: BLOCK: SUB~ SECTISN: BLOCK: SECTI~-N: ' BLOCk-?-- SUBDUE: SECTION: BLOCK: SUBD, flA~E: SECTI~ ' ' FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- lO) ii) i2) i3) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE R QUIR~D A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT~ ROOM 307. CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER TtlE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX ~p OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTI'~ENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. ' NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. 14) i/W~HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE AB ARE TRUE: SIGNATURE OF AGENT - (Name of person other than~ but ' (Same name as used in acting for the applicant~ filling Page 1) out all or a part of this appli- cation) A~D THE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ~EFORE M~ THIS ~]{ DAY OF (~~ NOTARY pr." ',, 'RS BOARD OF SU, ,..R/tSO CHE'31 .i- tel i_; COt, J FIT¥ CHESTERFIELD, VA. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY :Board of Supervisors Case No. ~/;~; Board of Zoning Appeals Fee Receipt APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL 1. EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST JDESIREO _ A) REZONING: From /~ ~/~-/~( ) To /~-~-~ ( Type of use(s) proposed: /~S/O~~'-/-/,~/~_ ~) CO~DZ~ZONA~ USg: l~ ¢%*%% ~?~2%' ~EC IAL EXCEPTION: , ~ ~,~u Auu~s~S: ~0, ~.~ ~ ~~ ~~/~ .... ~, ~// C) TELEHON[ NO. D) NAME OF P~ESENT OW~R' OF PROPERTY ON WHICH THIS REQUEST WILL E) MAILING ADDRESS: F) TELEP'~ONE NO.: G) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall b_~e attached hereto and made a part of this application.) .¢-~ ('"_., s.~ 5¢ 74: - 5 ~Z~ ~ ~,c,~/-~'s- o ~ A) c) 9) H) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN.QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) MAGISTERIAL DISTRIC .~/~,~-¢,r~/,~a/B) TAX MAP NO.'~:~-'~ SEC. NO. D) SUBDIVISION NO. E) * BLOCK NO. LOT OR PARCEL NO. G) STREET ADDRESS " SOURCE OF TITLE FOR ALL PROPERTIES I~OLVED DE~D-BOOK ..... PAGE STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST:_//t/ STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S): USE: C) EXISTING ZONING: TYPE D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: ~-~2~_/~-~ _~'"' GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the Count~"Assessor~ Room 213). A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NA E: MAILING ADDRESS: ~0 /~~~~~ ~¢~ TAX MAP NO.: ~.-~-(t3 L ~ SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: B) C) D) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: _~/q'~=~7' MAILING ADDRESS: _/~ ../-~ ~ TAX MAP No.: 'Y'd - LOT or PARCEL BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: /~7_~ TAX MAP NO.: ~ ~(~) - Z~ SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER~ S NAME :_~/~v.~//'LL~' ~/. /~/ MAILING ADDRESS: /t7~i ~o~.,~ $moo~C,;o~-- TAX MAP NO.: ~6 ~- SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: ~- BLOCK: ~3 SECTION: -2- E) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS:Z/gO/ TAX MAP NO.: ~-~--7. LOT or PARCEL: // /-/q .. F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: /t~ll TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: G) H) PROPERTY OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: ~ LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: ~-~ LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK: SUBD. NAME SECTION: D. NAME :, BLOCK: SECTION NAME: r~~... 1~/ ~, Z,~~ ,7 SUBD. ~ BLOCK: NAME: ~/!~ ~/~, . ~ 7 SUBD. z~- BLOCK: NAME SECTION I) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS:/! TAX MAP NO.: '2-~--7 LOT or PARCEL: J) PROPERTY OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS:~/D~ K) L) M) N) NAME: ~7-~,~/~--/d SECTION:,., SUBD. NAME :"~,~' ~l~ ~6~ -.~ BLOCK: gf SECTION TAX MAP NO.: ~_-~-7 LOT or PARCEL: ~ BLOCK: PROPERTY OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS:~.O..~,~.... ~,~ TAX MAP NO.: ~-~ - 7 D. 'SECTION:~ SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: //7Zl TAX MAP NO.: <Z6--~- LOT or PARCEL: ~ BLOCK: ~/ SECTION SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: .... .... SECTION BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ~~/~ ,/~. MAILING ADDRESS: /t7~L/ TAX MAP NO.: ..... ~-~ SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: ~ BLOCK: ~ SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- 10) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. 14) I/J~EREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: ,, ~Name or person other than, but (Same name a~/used in Item 2-A, acting for the applicant, filling Page l) out all or a part of this appli- cation) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES _ ,/A~'~, ~ (NOTARY -' ' -4- BOARD OF SUPERVISF'"q,S CHESTERFIELD COUN'r'Y CHESTERFIELD. VA. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Board of Supervisors Case No. Board of Zoning Appeals Fee Receipt APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) REZONING: From B-2 & R-7 ( ) To B~ Type of use(s) proposed:TrucR TreminalS ,Who~es&le Trade B) CONDITIONAL USE: (, ) ~) VARIANCE: SPECIAL EXCEPTION: · AME OF APPLICANT: Wilso~ Terminal C~orp. ~AILING ADDRESS: P.O. Drawer 2~ ........ ~a. 22939 Fishersville ~ TELEH0~" NO'. ~'03--942-52~1 D) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY ON WHICH THIS REQUEST WILL OCCUR: Same as E) MAILING ADDRE~'S:" · ELE~HONE NO : G) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: Mr, H.W. Umstadter, Ex. Vice Pres. Wilson Trucking Corp. H) ADDRESS:P.O. Drawer 2, FiShe'rsville, Va'22939 I)' TELEPHONE NO. ?0329&2-52&l Be IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION~ EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shait be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) A) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Bermuda B) TAX MAP NO. 67-3 C) SEC. NO. 1 D) SUBDIVISION NO, - E)--~BLOCK NO. _ F) ~LOT OR P~RCEL'No. G) STREET ADDRESS~oo~ ~ ?GoO J~ff-Davis ~ H) SOURCE OF TITLE F6R ALL' PROPERTIES iNVOLVED DEED~BOOK'se~ Plat ~ PAGE ' STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST:Expansion of existing fac~]~tiea. Ge STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: ~djacent areas are substantially undeveloped, and wooded areas provide screening to tract. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: A) EXISTING LAND USE (S): None B) EXISTING STRUCTURE (S): None USE: C) EXISTING ZONING: B-2 & R-7 TYPE D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: 7.688& Acres GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the Count~ Assessor~ Room 213). A ) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: Campbell, Paul E.. & Marion MAILING ADDRESS: 7508 Marilea Rd. Richmond, Va 2322..5 . TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 SUBD. NAME: - LOT or PARCEL: 23+ & 2&-1 BLOCK: SECTION: 1 B) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: Jackson, Annie May MAILING ADDRESS: 2680 D~ewrys ~luff Rd., Richmond, Va. TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 SUBD. NAME: - LOT or PARCE~ '11 BLOCK: SECTION: 1 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME:~ Aiken, Ray & Lavinia G. MAILING ADDRESS: 2686 Drewrys Bluff Rd, Richmond, Va TAX MAP NO.: 67~3 SUBD NAMe: LOT or PARCEL: i'l-1 ' BLOCK. SECTION: 1 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME :_ Wilson Terminal. CorD .... MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Drawer 2, Fisfersville, Va. 22939 TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: ~! BLOCK: SECTION: c) D) -2- E) F) G) H) I) K) L) M) N) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: 67~ LOT or PARCEL: A6 L & H Realty Corp. SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: 1 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Davis, Hannah Preston & William Davis ~LqILING ADDRESS: 2661 Drew~s Bluff Rd, Richmond, Va. TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 SURD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 2~ BLOCK: SECTION: i PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Preston, Sidney Lawrence MAILING ADDRESS:iTll 3rd ave., Ricnmond, Va TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 SURD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: AA-3 BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Preston, Sidney Lawrence MAILING ADDRESS: 1711 3rd Ave, Richmond, Va TAX MAP NO.~ 67~ SURD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: AA-2 BLOCK: SECTION: 1 PROPERTY OWNER' S NAME ~ Burnett, Atlanta Presvon MAILING ADDRESS: 2686 Drew~-~s Bluff Rd., Richmond, Va TAX MAP NO.: 67~5 ' SURD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: ~ BLOCK: SECTIONi 1 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: DrewrMs Bluff Presbyterian Church MAILING ADDRESS: 2715 Sw~rd"Rd., Richmond, mVa. TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 SURD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL': A8 BLOCK: SECTION: 1 PROPERTY OWNER' S NAME: Wilson Termimal Corp. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Drawer 2.Fishersville, Va 22939 TAX MAP NO.: 67-~' SURD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 49 __BLOCK: SECTION: 1 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME:Wilson Terminal Corp. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Drawer 2 Fis~ersville, Va. 22939 TAX MAP NO.: 67-~ SURD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 50 BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME-Trailer Homes Co. Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: ~Cary~ Stosch. & Wales - 1 n~ ~th st R~c~mo~d. Va TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 ' ~ '" LOT or PARCEL:,, 1 BLOCK, PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Sam___~e as M MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: 67-~ LOT or PARCEL: 2 BLOCK: SUBD. NAME: patterson Park A SECTION: 3, SUBD, NAME: Pater~on~Park A SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- o) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Trailer Homes Co. Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: % Gary, Stosch, & Wales- 1N. 5th St. Richmond, Va TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 SUBD. NAME: Patterson Park LOT or PARCEL': 3 BLOCK: A SECTION: 3 P) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ~tILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 LOT or PARCEL: & Same as 0 BLOCK: SUBD. NAME ~atterson Park SECTION: 3 ~ PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Maurie,. Charles E, ...... Q) MAILING ADDRESS: 1905 Evelyn B~rd Rd. Richmond , TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 LOT or PARCEL': 1 BLOCK: B ~ PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Same as Q R) MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 LOT or PARCEL: 2 SUBD. NAME: Patterson Park SECTION: 3 BLOCK: B SUBD. NAME:Patterson Park SECTION: 3 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: West, Norris MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 LOT or PARCEL: 3~ BLOCK: SUBD. NAME: SECTION: 1 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Evans, Robert v. & Patricia V. MAILING ADDRESS: 7004 Je'ffersonDavisHwy Richmond]"Va. TAX MAP NO.: 67-3 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 28 BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME, MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO,: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD~ NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 lO) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT~ ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN A~,~Y EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: July 11 ~ 197 ~ (Name of person other than, but acting for the applicant, filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) Wilson Te~l~ Corp. Mr. H.W. Umstatder EXEC. VICE PRES. ~j SI~IATURE OF APPLICAi~T ~Same name as used in Item 2-A, Page 1 ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ,, /~2 DAY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ~~~ z~2' , 19 ~. ,197~ . NOTARY -4- r ERViSORS CHESTERFIELD COtJ NY..Y. .HES FcR'FtE .D, VA. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY , Board of Supervisors Case No ~ ~ ~ * Board of Zoning Appeals Fee Receipt No (W/~¢I* APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ?~,~~.~O?LOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL : ~PLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED xA;~{[,~l'~..~"t-. A) REZONINS: From M-3 . ,~ ( ) ~o s-3 ( ) :~}8" ¢~$[7~:._~. Type of use(s) proposed: ,../ jUL~::'''~ -[:~'.(: Sale and storage of fencing mafierials. ~[t[~[O 'B) CONDITIONAL USE: A) NAME OF APPLICANT: Jerry L. Campbell, Agent B) MAILING ADDRESS: 8611 Midlotlaian Turnpike Ri'chm6'nd Va~ ~-3'235' C) TELEH~NE N0.:272-7501 D) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY ON WHICH THIS REQUEST WILL OCCUR: W. C. Hatcher (B]state C/O Mrs. B. L. Jackson E) MAILING ADDRESS: 230 Lee .Avenue, Colonial Heights~ Va, G) F) TELEphONE NO.: 526-4501 H) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: ADDRESS: I) ' TELEPHONE NO.: IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN' iA Copy o:f penJl..~, contract or option agreement shall b__qe Rttached hereto and made a part of this application.) Applicantis agent for owner. A) C) F) H) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Bermuda B) TAX MAP NO. 98-7 SEC. NO. D) SUBDIVISION NOo E) ..... BLOCK NO. LOT OR PARCEL NO. 4 G) STREET ADDRESS Coxendale Rca---d---- SOURCE OF TITLE FO~-~L PRO[ERTIES INVOLVED DE~'D BooK' 62 PAGE 259 STATE THE REASON ~OR THIS REQUEST: Property i~ under contract for sale and the purchaser cannot conduct his business on the" property withthe existing' ' zoning. STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: Adjacent property is presently zoned industrial and the proposed land use is a lighter use of the property than is now permitted witl~ the existing zonlng. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT~ SPECIAL EXC.~PT±ON~ CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Wooded B) EXISTING STRUCTURE (S)~i l~one USE: C) EXISTING ZONING: M-~ D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: c) D) acres T-T E GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT~ ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY° IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS 0F ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County As'sessor~ Room 213). A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: Lone Star ~dus%ires MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 420 Norf'~lk, Va~ Z~bOl TAX MAP NO.: 9"8-7 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 1 BLOCK: SECTION: B) PROPERTY OWNER*S NAME: WilliamBaylor Wilmouth MAILING ADDRESS: 1700 Coxendale Road Chester, Va. TAX MAP NO.: 98-7 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL 2 BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER,S NAME; WilliamBaylor Wilmouth MAILING ADDRESS: 1700 C~xendal'e Road' ~ester, Va. TAX MAP NO.: 98w27 SUBD. NAME: LOT orPARCEL:' 3 BLOCK:__ SECTION: PROPERTY 0~{.~ER' S NAME: Pauline Taylor Vaughan MAILING ADDRESS: 13213 Oakhaven Court Chester, Va. 23831 TAX MAP NO.: 98-8 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL' 1 BLOCK: SECTION: -2- E) F) G) N) I) J) K) L) N) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: O.J. Pruitt and F. G. Pruitt, Jr. MAILING ADDRESS: 2514 Grenoble Road Richmond, va~ z~zz~' TAX MAP NO.: 98-11 LOT or PARCEL: 7 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ~ILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO,: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO,: LOT or PARCEl: '" PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPER'~'Y O~NER:S MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD, NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- lO) ii) 13) NOTE: THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT~ ROOM 307. CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: A FEE SCHEDULE TREASURER~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE-ENTIRE PARCEL. ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. INCOMPLETE P ~ A PLICATION~ MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE ST/~TE.,[=i-~T~' ?'~' ~ A?[D THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: July ZZ, ~ 197 4 . SigNATURE OF'AGENT' (Name of person other than~ but acting for the applicant~ filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) SIG~LATURF] O'F APPLiCA]~T as used In Item 2-A, Page 1 ) ,197, ?. NOTARY Board of Board of ~D~ ' ., ;; ~R~FICE USE ONLY ~... . ~ ~ ~/ . Case No..- ~o~'~~¢~ ~ee ~eoeZp~ ~o. APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS T}{E FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) REZONING: From Type of use(s) proposed: B) CONDITIONAL USE: C) VARIANC'E: D) SPECIAL EXCEPTION: A) NAME OF APPLICANT: ~li~ ~!~ Ce. , tm~. B) MAILING ADDRESS: ~ -l~vl, ~i~~, ~ Hull 5f. RIC~, V~ D) N~E OF~~ ~ ~RO~ERTy ON WHICH THIS REQUEST WILL E) MAILING ADDRESS: '~/o Tmvts ~Ify ~., ~ ' · " F) TELEPHONE NO.: 27~12 NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY H) ADDRESS: ~ ~Ull bf,~ ~l~ii-~, Ve, 2~3~ .... ~Z) TELEFH0~ NO.: 2~12 IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Co_p~ of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) A) C) F) H) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~|dlo~|an B) TAX MAP NO. 8-16 SEC. N0~ ..... D) SUBDIVISION N0o E)- BLOCK NO. - LOT OR ARCE5 NO. 5 G) STREE~ ADDRESS ~e~fRo~d,~ SOURC~F TITLE F~R ALL PROPERTIES INVOLVED DEED BOOK ~'J98 PAGE ' ' STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: Presentzonj~!.doe~..nO.t~mitl. n_.~n~use.- STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: All ad_joinins~ ~m_~er~ _mesen, tly zoned business. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT~ SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S)':" USE: C) EXISTING ZONING: TYPE e D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: ~..a~Im~y2.$.c~ree GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT~ ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor~ Room 213). A) B) C) D) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: ~0 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS~ TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL ~ PROPERTY OWNER'S N.AME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: 2 PROPERTY 0WNER~S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL' ~ Co.~lldatecl ~les ¢io., 5600 W. ~!1 St. SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: A. Devoe l~lanken~i~ 11469 Rob~ous P4~ad~ ~on Air~ Va. 23235 9-13 SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: A. ~voe ~lan~enship i1469 RoI~Ious P.d.,, ,~ Air~ Va. 9-!3 SUBD. N~ME: __ BLOCK: SECTION: ~ah H~dtey i I ~ ~i~ Rd. ~ ~on Air~ Va. 23235 9.-1,3 _ BLOCK: SUBD. NAME: SECTION: E) F) G) H) I) J) K) L) M) N) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: Ro~R~ Rood As~oc~Gt~ofl MAILING ADDRESS: c/o Carl J. Knott~ ,Jr.~,3~!2 W. ~, St.t ~~; Va. 2~I TAX MAP NO.: 8-16 SUBD. NA~: LOT or PARCEL: ~ BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER' S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: Njn~ & TAX MAP NO.: ~1~ SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 3 BLOCK: SECTION PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: ~o~ 268, TAX MAP NO.: ~-~ SUBD. NAME~ LOT or PARCEL: 3 BLOCK: SECTION PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ~o~_A,~.c~ MAILING ADDRESS: 9~ ~11~, St..~. S~k. ,. ~1~ TAX MAP NO.; ~6 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: ~ BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME; The Ed~HlllCa, , . MAILING ADDRESS: ,. ,/~/~/~ /~ ~]/~£ ~ /~/~,/~/¢/~ ~.,', TAX MAP NO.: ~-~6 SUBD. NAME: ...... LOT or PARCEL: ~ BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ~6~c~tnve~me~t Co., c/o A. G. W t~l,g~n MAILING ADDRESS: :FI22 Fa~,,~t Hill A~, RI~~ Va. ~5 TAX MAP NO.: .... ~'16 SUBD. NA~: LOT or PARCEL: 9 BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: ,mil~l~S~lmC~.~i~::. ~al MAILING ADDRESS:560OW.~tlSt,, R~c,hmo, nd, Va~ 23230 TAX ~AP NO.: ~-~ SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 5-! BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER' S NAME: ~~ J~t~ C~. MAILING ADDRESS: ,//~//~ .'~ O'?,,~,,U,,.~/_ ~ ~/~~'~ ~. TAX MAP NO.: ' SUBD. NAME- LOT or PARCEL: ... ~ BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME. MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- lo) ii) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT~ ROOM 307. CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: TREASURER~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE .APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. NOTE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE ST~TEM~TS? , ~,T , A}!D THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: P. L. Travls, Jr. - SIG~'ATbRE OF AGENT// / (Name of person other ~a~, but acting for the applic~, filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) SIUIIA?U~E ~g APPLICANT (Same name as used in Item 2-A, Page 1 ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS COmmiSSION EXPreSS NOTARY -4- BOARD OF eUP RVlS©R ) Board of Board of APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) REZONING: From (8-2) To (8-3) Type of use(s) proposed: ClinicalonlyAnima.I Hospital NOTE: Only a ~rfion of~arcelbeinareau~f~d ~rchnnn~-.S~ Plnt~t~nch~l. B) CONDITIONAL USE: .... C) VARIANCE: D) SPECIAL EXCEPTION: A) NAME OF APPLICANT: C-nn~nl;dnf,.d Nale~ Ch.. Inc. B) MAILING ADDRESS: c/g TraviS Realty Company, 7148 Hull St., Ri~:hmond, V&'. 23235 D) NAME OF PRESENT OWNER OF PROPERTY ON WHICH THIS REQUEST WILL OCCUR: Consolidated Sales Co., Inc. E) MAILING ADDRESS:.c/o Travis Realty Co., 7148 Hull St.,~Richmond, Va. 23235 ~ F) ' TELEI~-HONE NO. :276-7812 G) NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: Cnnmlidat,d gnl~_~ Co._ Inc.. c/o Travis Realty Co.. H) ADDRESS: 7148 Hull St.: Richmond. V~,. 232'$5' , ' ' ' I) TELEPHONE NO.: 276-7812 IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, EXPLAIN: (A Copy of pending contract or option agreement shall be attached hereto and made a part of this application.) A) C) F) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obtained from the Office of the County Assessor, Room 213) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~[d~ot~|an B) TAX MAP NO. 8-16 SEC. NO. D) SUBDIVISION NO. E)-' BLOCK NO. LOT OR P~-R~EL 'NO. 5 _ G) STREET .ADDRESS Huguenot Road, Rt.-~q~ SOURCE OF TITLE F~R ALL PROPERTIES INVOLVED DE~D BO0~' 1098 ' PAGE 754 . -- STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: Present zonin~q.does not pe_.rm~[tin~e~.c!~ use. w STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS OR THE oURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD: Air adjoinin.q property presently zoned business. EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT~ SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: None B) A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): B-2 B) EXISTING STRUCTURE(S)7.'$hoppin~ C~nfer TYPE ~asona~ USE: Nelahbo~oodbusiness C) EXISTING ZONINg: B-2 D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: $.. Plan ~n~;nq,,.~;~.~ GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT~ ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTIO~ OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor~ Room 21~). A) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME:_ConsoJld~fed SaJe~Co.~lng, MAILING ADDRESS: ~ACIO~ ~n~hnllS~. TAX MAP NO.: 9-13 SUBD. NAME: LOT or ARCmL: ~O BLOCK: SECTION: p PROPERTY OWNER~ S NA~E: _ A. Devoe B~nEenship MAILING ADDRESS: ~ ]]469 ~bjous ~ed, ~n.Ai~, Vo. 23235 TAX MAP NO.: 9-]3 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL 3 C) PROPERTY OWNER,S q~HE: MAILING ADDRESS: ' ' TAX MAP NO.: . 9-13 LOT or PARCEL: 2 D) PROPERTY OWNER,S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.:_~ ,9-]~ LOT or PARCEL: BLOCK- SECTION: ]]469 Roblous Rd.~ I~on Air~ Va. 23235 SUBDo NAME ~ BLOCK: SECTION: Josiah Hundley !1450 Rqbious Rd,, ~n Air, .Va,. 2323~ SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: -2- E) PROPERTY OWNER v S NAME: RoJ0ious Road Association MAILING ADDRESS :. ¢/o Carl J. K,off~ Jr., 3312 W. Cary Sr., R|¢hmoncl, Va. 232~1 TAX MAP NO.: 8-16 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 6 BLOCK: SECTION: F) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: Maw F TAX ~4AP NO.: 8-12 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 3 BLOCK: SECTION: G) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: Richardson H. Fer~uson MAILIN~ ADDRESS: ~ 9A~_ Ri_ 1; M;dlnthJan. VO. TAX MAP NO.: _. 82~6 ' SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 3 BLOCK: SECTION: H) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: ~thy A. Mazarz MAILING ADDRESS: 9608 W[ll[ngton St., Seabr~k, ~a~land TAX MAP NO.: 8,]6 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: 2 BLOCK: SECTION: I) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: The Edge H[II Co. TAX MAP NO.: 8-~g SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL:__ 4_] BLOCK: SECTION: J ) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: RoB;ous ~,~$~men~ Co., c/o A. G. ~he~n~o, MAILING ADDRESS: 7]22 Fo~es~ H;~ Avenue, R;chmond, V~. 23225 TAX MAP NO.: 8-]6 SUBD. NAME: LOT or PARCEL: .. 9 BLOCK: SECTION: K) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: Cn,~o~d~ed S~es Co MAILING ADDRESS: .~O ~. ~h~ S~.~ R;chmond,-V~. 23230 TAX MAP NO.: 8-~6 SUBD. NAME LOT or PARCEL: 5-] ~BLOCK: SECTION: L) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: SQu~hem R~o~d Co. MAILING ADDRESS: /.~ ~ . Cm~ M) N) TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL:R/~ SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD, NAME: BLOCK: ~' SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO,: LOT or PARCEl': SUBD, NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- ~o) ii) i2) 1.3 ) NOTE: 14) THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING.DEPARTMENT~ ROOM 307. CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: C ~ TREASURER~ OUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX MAP OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS° INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STATEM~ENTS A~D THE STATEMENTS C ' ~ ONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: July SIG~ATU~ OF ~GEN~'// '~ (Name of person other ~, but (Same acting for the apPllc~t,-filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) ' name as used in Item 2-A, Page 1) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ~-- /~ -4- '' '~ ~ ~'~ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY , r~tsors..... ~.,~'~4ES~RF~LD C©Ltt'~'~ F- Case No ' //[ / , ..,. ~ ,~ Zoning Appeals Fee Receipt No APPLICATION TO THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OR BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE TYPED OR PRINTED AND COMPLETED IN FULL EXPLAIN FULLY THE REQUEST DESIRED A) REZONING: From Type of use(s)-proposed: ( ) To ( ) B) CONDITIONAL USE'.,,~j C) VARIANC'E :' ' ' D) SPECIAL EXCEPTION: ~v .~ ..~.~ u~' FHSSENT O~NER OF PROPERTY ON WHIOH THIS REQUEST W~LL occur: , MAILING ADDRESS: -- . F) "'TE~EYHONE NO.: NAME OF PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: ADDRESS: I) T~,EPHONE NO.: IF THE APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION~ EXPLAIN: (A Co__q~ of pending contract or option agreement shall ~e attached hereto and made a part of this application.) A) C) F) a) LOCATION OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION (Following information shall be obta~ne~rom the Office of the County Assessor, Room.~.~.3~ MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~//'~/) o~ ~ ....... ~ ,t^' _ ....'F, ~ .,{,.~-~ ~/ ~aa mar NO. ~u. ~u..___ D) SUBDIVISION NO. E -' ' LO ~ , ) BLOCK NO T OR PARCEL NO / G , -- . ~' ~ ) STREET ADDRESS /~ .~. STATE THE REASON FOR THIS REQUEST: STATE HOW THIS REQUEST WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE ADJACEN~ PROPER~TY OWNERS OR THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD- ~? EXPLAIN ANY EXISTING USE PERMIT~ SPECIAL EXCEPTION, CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE GRANTED PREVIOUSLY ON THE PARCEL IN QUESTION: St A) EXISTING LAND USE(S): B) EXISTINQ STRUCTURE(S): USE: C) EXISTING ZONING: TYPE D) TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE REQUEST: GIVE NAMES OF ALL OWNERS ADJACENT, ACROSS THE ROAD OR HIGHWAY AND FACING THE PROPERTY AND ANY OWNERS ACROSS ANY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM SUCH PROPERTY° IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY AFFECTED IS SITUATED AT OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY TWO OR MORE ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEED OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANY ROAD OR HIGHWAY WITH A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR AT OR WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OF ANY TWO RAILROADS, GIVE NAMES OF PROPERTY OWNERS AT ALL CORNERS OF ANY SUCH INTERSECTION. (Following information MUST BE obtained by the applicant from the office of the County Assessor~ Room 213). A) PROPERTY OWNER ' S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: ]~ ,.~. i:? LOT or PARCEL: '~ - ~.-,, BLOCK B) PROPERTY OWNER' S NAME .' MAILING ADDRESS ~ :/ .... T~X MAP MO.: .'~ LOT or PARCE~ ~/. ~.~ c) D) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: ~: LOT or PARCEL: ~:~ SUBD. NAME: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: BLOCK: SUBD. SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S TAX MAP NO.: , ..~ ........... SUBD. NAME: "~' : BLOCK: LOT or PARCEL2_ .~ SECTION: -2- E) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: :~ w'~/ TAX MAP NO.: ,.~-,,i,,Z]p LOT or PARCEL': ~!(~..? F) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ~DDRmSS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: G) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: H) PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: I) J) K) L) M) BLOCK: N ) SUBD. NAME: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX M~P NO,: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NA~;~': 'BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEl: SUBD. NAME~ BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEl: SUBD, NAME~ BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME,: BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SUBD. NAME: __BLOCK: SECTION: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: MAILIN~ ADDRESS: TAX MAP NO.: LOT or PARCEL: SU~-~. NAMe: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD. NAME: BLOCK: SECTION: SUBD, NAME: BLOCK: - SECTION: FOR ADDITIONAL SPACE USE THE BACK OF PAGES 2 & 3 -3- THE APPLICANT HEREWITH DEPOSITS THE FEE REQUIRED. A FEE SCHEDULE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT~ ROOM 307. 11) CHECK OR MONEY ORDER MUST BE MADE PAYABLE TO: :~ TREASURER~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ~ 12) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLIC^TION EITHER THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY TAX P4AP~ OR A SURVEYED PLAT OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL. 13) NOTE: 14) ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION ANY PERTINENT SITE PLANS OR TENTATIVE PLATS. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION~ MAY DELAY THE SCHEDULING OF REQUESTS. I/WE HEREBY DEPOSE AND SAY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE STKTE:.~[TS: .v.~,.. A~[D THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ANY EXHIBITS TRANSMITTED ARE TRUE: '- SIGNATURE OF AGENT (Name of person other than, but acting for the applicant, filling out all or a part of this appli- cation) S IGNATUR~ OV/A~LICANT (Same name as used I~ I~em 2-A~ Page 1 ) /- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /~' DAY OF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES //.'~' ,~ ~ , 19 '~ -4- News-Journal, Chesterfield County, Va. This is to certify that the attached ?~/b ['~og,&~as published in the NEWS-JOURNAL, ~ newspaper published in Chester, Va. on q- v-- ~/. 9- /~- ~¢ . The first inse;rt~;~being PUB L I SE, I'E~R foliowiag .port~ 9:~00 ' MAP SI~3WING 3 PAR~LS OF LAND SITUATED ON JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY AT GALENA ROAD IN CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA. NOTE: Improvements not shown. ~ ~5~!f CER*,F,ED .','__ M.E. EAt$y~ 1" = 100 ' ..................................... SCALE__ VIRGINIA CERTIFICATE NO. 810 ~I* 19~ J.N.__~l'~' DATE OFFICE (703) 748-6097 ~ RESIDENCE (703) 272-5437 MORRIS E. MASON ATTORNEY AT LAW P. O. BOX 25 CHESTERFIELD COURT HOUSE, VIRGINIA 23832 ~u~lt 2~, X974 4331 OXd limuired Road Chester, VXrSXaLs 23831 phase f~d les~l notLce in connoctton With certificate should be in hind h£ore the ochod~led heiriu8 dice. County AC~orney TAKE NOTIC~ that on the 2$th day of Septm~ber~ 197~ at 9:00 or as soon thereafter as may be heard, the Board o£ Supervisors oi the County o£ Chea~arfiald, Virgin/a, at its reg~hr mating plac~ h consider t~ follo~tn~ ordina~ce £or adoption: AN ORD~¢E to vacate a portion of a 20 foot ~nimproved road ri~ht-of-~ay kno~ a~t desig~ted as Rivers/Ac Drive in the subdlv~sion o[ Plan o~ S.o~alie, a plat o£ which made by T. Cra~£ord Redd a~d ~rothers, Surveyors and En~ineers, dahed February 5, 1914, :~s recorded in the Clerk's Office, C~rcuit Court, Chesterfield County, VirginLa, ~n Plat Book 3, 80, and t~ port£on to be vacated be~n~ more particularly sho~n on a plat dated A~ust 21, 1974, made by H. E. Floyd, ¢.L.3., Richmond, copy o£ ~hich ia attached to the proposed Ordinance and be re£erence ~ade a part thereof. The complete text of the proposed Ordinance is on file in the office of the County Administrator of Chesterfield County, Virginia, at Chesterfield Court House, and may be examin~ by all l~terested parties between the hours of 9:00 A.~i. and 5:00 P.~i., :ionday through Friday. THIS DEED OF DEDIGATION, mada this 26th day of August, 1974, by and between GEORGE V. HARYE¥ aud EAT~I~ P. iiARVEY, his wife, parties of t~ first part, and the GOUNTY OF CHg~EB_FIELD, VIrgiNIA, party Of tb~ second That t~or a~l i~ com~i~e~ation of the ~u~ of t~ mural ~fi~s acc~ui~ or to accure ~o a~ other g~ and val~ble consideration, ~h~ ~eceip~ of which ~$ ~reby a~k~wled~ea, ~he par~s of th~ f~rs~ gran~ a~ convey, wi~h General Wa~anty of set forth, w~h E~lfsh Cov~uts, u~to ~he ~r~ of tb~ saco~ ~r~, for public use as Industrial access r~d, the ~oll~i~ described p~rty, to- wi . ALL that certain piece or parcel of land, lying and being in Bermuda District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, fronting Jefferson Davis High. ay (U. S. Route 1-301) oppos£te Galena Road, containing 0.564 acres, being a strip of land 60 feet in width, com~mm:i~ at tP~ east right-of-way line of Jefferson Davis ILtghway~ opposite th~ can~erliu~ oZ G~leua Road, and pro- ceedi~g eastwardly on a curve for a dis~mce of approx- Imately 540 feet, all of which is more particularly sho~wn end designar~d as "Parcel A' and "Parcel C', on a plaC of survey dated August 21~ 1974, ~ade by }.t.E. Floyd, C.L.S., P&chmond, Virginia, and which plat is at~ached hereto and made a part hereof by ~hie reference for a complete amd accurate metes and bounds description of the said land. BEING a portion of the same r~al estate conveyed to GEORGE V. }~RV~f and KATHLEEN P. HARVEY, his wife, as tenants by the entireties with ~he right of survivorship a~ a~ C~aon Law, by deed ingot March 11, 196~, from Frank B. Daniel amd Olive M, Dam/el, his wife, recorded April 1, 196~, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Ch~sterfiel~ County, Virginia, in De~d Book 912, page 272; and a portion of the same real es2ate conveyed ~o George V. Harvey and Ka~hleau P. Harvey, his wife, as tenants by the entireties with the right of survivorship as at Common Law, by deed da~ed ~ay 28, I968, from L. R. Goyna and Ro~a V. Goyne, his wife. recorded June 3, 1968, in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 918, pass 560. This conveyance is made subject to restric~ions, easements, and conditions of record insofar as they may be lawfully applicable to the property hereby conveyed. This conveyance co the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, is made in compliance with ~ction 15.1-286 of tb~ 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and is approved by the Commonwealth's Atto~y as to fo~."m, ami a¢cept~l on behalf of the Board of Supervisors by resolu~ion of the Board duly adopted, as certif~ed by its Clerk, authorized to so ac~, as evidenced by their affixing their signatures to this deed of dedication. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: G~o=~e V. Parvey Ka~hleeu P. I~¢ey STATE OF VIRGINIA COIR~ OF CttESTERFIELD, to-wit: I, theundarsfgn~d~ a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that GEORGE V. HARVEY and EATHIW~N P. HARVEY, his wife, whose names are signed to the foregoing Deed of Ded/cattun, bearing date of August 26th, 1974, have ~ach acknowledged the same before me i~ my ]urtsdictlo~ aforesaid. Given um/e~ my ha~d this ..... ~ ..... ~ay of Hy co[muission expires: , 1~74. -2- At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chester- field County, Virginia, held at the Courthouse on September 25, 1974, at 9:00 A.M. AN ORDINANCE to amend the vacation ordinance passed on July 25, 1974, to vacate a portion of a 20 foot road right-of-way, known and designated as Riverside Drive, in the subdivision of Plan of Rosalie, a plat of which made by T. Crawford Redd and Brothers, Engineers and Surveyors, dated February 5, 1914, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Plat Book 3, page 80, styled Plan of Rosalie, Bermuda District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, the said portion of 20 foot wide right-ofrway being unimproved and not used for public purposes and being more particularly shown on a plat of survey of a portion of the aforesaid subdivision plat and adjoining property, dated August 21, 1974, shaded in red, made by M. E. Floyd, C.L.S., Richmond, Virginia, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference; and, WHERFAS, George V. Harvey and Kathleen P. Harvey, his wife, have amended their petition to the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate a portion of the unimproved 20 foot right-of-way known and designated as Riverside Drive, in the subdivision of Plan of Rosalie as shown shaded in red on a plat of survey of a portion of the said sub- division plat and adjoining property, dated August 21, 1974, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference; and, WHEREAS, the said petitioners agree to dedicate to the County of Chesterfield a 60 foot wide road right-of-way shown cross-hatched on the aforesaid plat; and, WHEREAS, notice of the adoption of this Ordinance has been given in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: 1. That pursuant to Section 15.1-482, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, that the portion of the unimproved 20 foot wide road right- of-way as described above and shown shaded in "red" on the plat attached hereto showing a portion of the Plan of Rosalie and adjoining property, be, and it is hereby vacated, subject to receipt by the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, a deed of dedication of the 60 foot wide road right-of-way shown cross-hatched on the aforesaid plat. 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amemded, and a certified copy hereof, together with the plat attached, shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Cizcuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia. This Ordimance takes the pla~eof.~and supercedes that ordinamce approved and parsed by the Board of Supervisors at its regular meeting on July 2~~'~, 1974. County Administrator -2- MAP S~DWING ~ PARCELS OF LAND SITUATED ON JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY AT GALENA ROAD IN CHEST~FIELD COUNT~, VIRGINIA, August 21, 1974 NO TE: Improvements no t s~wn. irginia urt~e~,~ ~ CERTIFIED BY VIRGINIA CERTIFICATE NO. 810 + 125 J. N ..... ~5 3~ \%., 1" = 100' SCALE. D^TE 8/21/7~ At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chester- field County, Virginia, held at the Courthouse on September 25, 1974, at 9:00 A.M. AN ORDINANCE to amend the vacation ordinance passed on July 25, 1974, to vacate a portion of a 20 foot road right-of-way, known and designated as Riverside Drive, in the subdivision of Plan of Rosalie, a plat of which made by T. Crawford Redd and Brothers, Engineers and Surveyors, dated February 5, 1914, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Plat Book 3: page 80, styled Plan of Rosalie, Bermuda District~ Chesterfield County, Virginia, the said portion of 20 foot wide right-of?way being unimproved and not used for public purposes and being more particularly shown on a plat of survey of a portion of the aforesaid subdivision plat and adjoining property, dated August 21, 1974, shaded in red, made by M. E. Floyd, C.L.S., Richmond, Virginia, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference; and, WHEREAS, George V. Harvey and Kathleen P. Harvey, his wife, have amended their petition to the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, to vacate a portion of the unimproved 20 foot right-of-way known and designated as Riverside Drive, in the subdivision of Plan of Rosalie as shown shaded in red on a plat of survey of a portion of the said sub- division plat and adjoining property, dated August 21, 1974, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference; and, WHEREAS, the said petitioners agree to dedicate to the County of Chesterfield a 60 foot wide road right-of-way shown cross-hatched on the aforesaid plat; and, I~tERJIAS, notice of the adoption of this Ordinance has been given in accordance with Section 15.1-431 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. NOW, T~REFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia: 1. That pursuant to Section 15.1-482, of the Code of Virginia, 1950~ as amended~ that the portion of the unimproved 20 foot wide road right- of-way as described above and shown shaded in "red" on the plat attached he.'eto showing a portion of the Plan of Rosalic and adjoining property, be, and it is hereby vacated, subject to receipt by the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, a deed of dedication of the 60 foot wide roar right-of-way shown cross-hatched on the aforesaid plat. 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect in accordance with Section 15.1-482 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and a certified copy hereof, together with the plat attached, shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia. This Ordinance takes the place'of-and supercedes that ordinance approved and parsed by the Board of Supervisors at its regular meeting on July 25, 1974. County Administrator ,? ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SEPTEMBER 25~ 1974 II. III. IV. VI. ~ Vii. VIII. IX. XIIi. Approval of water contracts: (1) W74-67D Sycamore Square Shopping Center $22,017.50 Contractor: Fred W. Barnes Construction Company, Inc. (2) W74-68D Huguenot Office Building $2,264.00 Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc. Discussion of refund policy for installation of off-site water lines for Loch Braemar Subdivision. Distribute copies of Proposed Water Quality Management Plant for the Tri-City and Surry Courthouse Areas (PD #19). Approval of sewer contracts: (1) S74-53D Kingswood & Meadows, Section "B" (2) (3) $76,197.00 Contractor: McLean Construction Company S74-57D Route 360 Y.M.C.A. $33,729.75 Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc. S74-58D Huguenot Office Building $9,580.50 Contractor: Stamie E. Lyttle Company, Inc. Approval of Change Order No. 1 for Contract S73-31T, Timsbury Creek. Approval of Change Order No. 2 for Contract S73-25T, Ashton Creek Pump Station. Discussion of draft of Colonial Heights sewer contract. Discuss results of sewer survey for Contract S73-1T, Gravel- brook - Trampling Farms area. Request for participation in off-site sewer program and acquisition of emsements for Bexley. Consideration of sewer installation in Burge Avenue Revocation of Discharge Permits. Discuss condemnation.of off.-site sewer a~d drainage easement for Loch Braemar Subdivision. Request authorization to condemn off-site drainage easement across Mallory property (Olde Coach Village). Agenda - Engineering and Utilities Department Page 2 September 25, 1974 XIV. Discuss request to grade and seed Vineland Road (dedicated right of way not built). XV. Discuss off-site easement for school on Hopkins Road. Resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings against the following properties: MIDLOTH IAN DISTRICT Lee Conner Realty Corporation Chappell, M. E. & Lois S., his wife Skidmore, L. A. & Niancy P, his wife --Hobbs, John Bo & Dorothy E., his wife Daniels, Fred H. Jr. ~-Alford, Kenneth D. & Elda S., his wife $100.00 $25.00 $25.00 125.00 50.00 25.00 7032-6B/51 7032-6B/23 7032-6B/17 7032-6A/26 7032-6A/29 7032-6B/9 BERMUDA DISTRICT Hilton W. Goodwyn, John W. Pearsall, Trustees $50.00 S73-24T/J Raymond O. Powers, J. J. Jewett, Richard M. Allen, Trustees $200.00 573-32T/ XVII. Miscellaneous Robert A. Painter County Engineer September 20, 1974 ND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 1'O: FROM: S UBJ ECT: September 5~ 1974 Chief Administrators ir, Planning, D.~strict !5 Edward G. Councill, I1~, Executive Director Revised Compact For Richmond--Crater Consortium (Secflon 208) As noted in my August 26 memo~ several changes kave been made in the dr~,ft Consort;ur~'~ Compac~ based on feedbc~ck f~orn arec~ l occ~lJties. These chcmge~ have been incorporated into the aHached copy of the Compact. Should you desire any Further assJs~cmce in presenHng the compact to your govern[r,g body,, please let me know. Also, please advise me of your govern- [ng J~odyls appointee to the consortium policy board as soon a.~; the choice is made (~f you have not' already done so) so that I (:an begin preparing a mailing list For the Board's initial meeting on September 30. /'tls Attachment 6 NORTH SIXTH STREET, SUITE SOO, RI(:HMOND. VIRGINIA 2,3219 · PHONE (8[04) 64,4-8E~6 ND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION August 26, 1974 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Chief Administrators in Planning District 15 Edward G. 'Councill, ii! CIc~rificciti'on of August 14 Correspondence & Status .Report re: R~chmond-Crater Consortium (208) Genflernen: Confusion over the questioz'~ of the Consortium voting procedure has necess~tat'ed additional clarification. On checking w[th Mr. Henley, who on August 8atthe Intergovernmental Coordination Committee 'rnade the mo?ion regarding this r~atter, ! have confirmed that each of thc seventeen represent¢~tives attending the initinl Con.~ortium meeting on September 30 will e×erc:se e vote equal in weight to the number of voles to which his [urisdiction is entitled as a member of either PD 15 or 19. Under this c~rrangemeni' dt.~scribed at the top of page 3a p,:evlously mailed to you, a' total of 48 votes would be cast by the sevenl'een local governmental re prese n tati yes. Should the Richmond proposal (erroneously described begir~ning at thc~. middle of page 3a - each Iocalit'y should be given 1 oddh'ioz~l vole, which allo~s each 2 vote~ for the first 10~000 ......... by" the initial voting arr',.mgemen~ a two-lhirds vote (or 32 of the 48) is required for implementeHon. 208 Status Report · Last week I met with Crater PDC staff on J'l~e above issue, additional 'Feedb,.~cl.-. on the Compact', c, nd where we go from hei'e leading to the September 30 meetin~.~. ! clarified the voting question in respot~se to Mr. Turner's August 14 ~,etter, and assured ~hem theft the confu~ion on w~ting as well ~s tl'~e erroneous descrip;'ion of the Richmond a!¢,~.rnalive w.~s ~ misinterpret'etlon and ove,'sight for w!~ich responsl fcc:c~a,;k received since Jul),' z on Come,ct Secondly, we discussed any '~'" "9 !'he itself. On lhe bas~s of such feedback, the Fo[lo~,h'~g ct~onges w~l[ ~ke~y ~e 6 NORTH SIXTH STREET, SUITE $00, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 2S219 * PHONE (804) 644-8S~ page 2 August 26, 1974 made os the final compact is drafted for consideration of your governing body during September: That the August 12, 1974 Concurring Resolution be amended by adding the following words after the second line from the barton, "concurrLng resolutions by" .... "...the governing bodies of jurisdictions within planning districts 15 and 19, w~os'e total'population represent at least 90% o£ that of the Area," 2. That page 3 of the August 5, 1974, draft be inserted for page 3 of the August 12, 1974, draft; 3. That page 3a be deleted altogether; o That inasmuch os no local appropriations are anticipate~l to finance any aspect of the Consortium 208 contract obligation, the last sentence of the first paragraph under C.2. on page 6 read as follows: "Upon receipt of notice ...... may be necessary." be deleted; 5. That, because it duplicates an earlier provision, the first sentence at the top of page 7 reading as follows: "This charter shall take .... the authorized signatoria." be deleted. Third, although most of the localities in PD 19 have had o presentation of the ConsorI'ium and the Compbct, no locality has been asked or yet adopted the con- curring resolution. The same is true in PD 15. Given this Fact, plus the above, it was decided that should no changes of substance be proposed by August 30, a final Concurring Resolution and Compact would be sent to all localities for their adoption. Again, each PDC start: is prepared lo appear on request before such governing bodies to answer questions. Fourth, the attached ad has been nationally circulated in an effort to provide the lead staff project manager for our 208 planning program. The ad will appear locally as well as in the Washington Post and trade journals. Any suggestion~ you have are quite welcOme. Fifth, i've received o check for $94,900 as the "front-end" money from EPA. it has been deposited in a temporary account until a permanent Treasurer is appointed. Page 3 August 26, 1974 Last, in an effort to minimize future opportunities for confusion, conflicting information, or misinterpretation and to assure that each local government receives identical information, Crater and ! have agreed that all information/ communication on 208 related matters be screened in advance of d[stribution and that each office receive a copy of all such correspondence. Appropriate' reading fi les will be maintained for the convenience of the participating local governments. EOC,III/dmc cc: Mr. Charles Turner, Executive Director Crater PDC Attachment PROJECT COORDINATOR -- For two year Section 208 water quallty management planning program. Project covers two plannh~g districts ~n Virginia, including the Richmond and Petersburg metropolitan areas. Position i-s attached to planning district commissionsI staffs and supports joint 208 policy board by coordinating staff, consultant, and local efforts in the 208 process. Requires previous background and experience in water quality management, land use planning, governmental Financing and administration, and coordination among local, state, and Federal agencies· Must be able to work closely with local officials and be sensitive to local growth and development issues. Salary to $25,000, depending on education and experience. Send resume to Edward G. Councill, Iii, Executive Director, Richmond Regional Planning District Commission, 6 North Sixth Street, Suite 500, Richmond, Virginia 23219. 8/ 9/74 6 NORTH SIXTH STREET. 5UIT~ 500. ~'"~ICHMON£~,, VIRGINIA 2~.?.lg~ · J:HOlqE (~04) 644-858.6 CRATER t..ANNING DISTRICT JJVtMISSiON CITY OF COLONIAL HEIGHTS COUNTY OF DINWIDDIE CITY OF EMPORIA COUNTY OF GREENSVILLE CITY OF HOPEWELL CITY OF PETERSBURG COUNTY OF PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY Of SURRY COUNTY OF SUSSEX August 14, 1974 Mr. Edward G. Councill, III Executive Director Richmond Regional Planning District Commission 701 East Franklin Street - Suite 810 Richmond, Virginia 23219 CHARLES F. TURNER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PHONE 861 1666 282.5 CRATER ROAD, SOUTH POST OFFICE BOX 1808 PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803 Dear Ed, The proposal of your Intergovernmental Coordinating Committee, changing the previously agreed-upon method of voting forothe 208 Consortium was discussed at some length with our Chairman, Arthur Lane. It was his decision that the voting procedure set up on page 3 of the proposed compact.should remain in effect. I concur in the decision. At the July 29 meeting in Chester, our groups discussed the proportional voting systems and the proposal then before the group was adopted without a dissenting vote. We recognize that the question of voting strength is of considerable interest to the City of Richmond and perhaps to others within ~our District. We also recognize that there would be many options which could be attempted in arriving at what all parties would consider an equitable compromise. The voting propesal in the current compact does, we feel, provide the most logical and reasonable method: distributing th~ voting strength among the jurisdictions on the basis of loNg-standing arrangements in effect in each planning district. It is also felt that, should the Consortium be zequired to begin its first meeting with an item as potentially sensitive as the voting question, considerable delay and even friction would be a likelihood. By havihg the Consortium come together with a predetermined voting framework, action could begin immediately, with any revision in that voting f~amework of less than immediate concern. We do sincerely hope that an impasse can be avoided, but do most s~rongly feel that the Jurisdictions within your District should proceed on the basis of the previously approved voting arrangements. These arrangements can, as spelled out in the compact, be changed by subsequent action of the Consortium. Yours most sincerely, Charles F. Turner Executive Director CFT :Jmy cc: Chief Administrative Officers, PD 15 and PD 19. ND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION MEMORANDUM TO: Intergovernmental Coordination Committee FROM: Edward G. Councill, IJl~ Executive Director SUBJECT: Section 208 Comortium - Status Report DATE: August 5, 1974 On July 29, a special joint' meeting of the RRPDC's Intergovernmental Coor- dlnation Committee and the Crater Planning District Commission's Executive Committee met to consider action on the Richmond .- Crater Consortium's pending Section 208 water quality management planning grant .' At that timer the combined group tool< the following actions: Authorized the acceptance of the $950,000 EPA grant of£er on the condition that no funds be spent until authorized by the Consortium Board. R__ecommended that the Consortium Board be made up of one elected official (or his designee) from each city and county in Planning Dis- tricts 15 and 1"9; further recommended that each local repres'en-E'fE'five's vote be weighted in proportion to his Iocality's voting strength on the respective Planning District Commission (or, in Chesterfield's case, the county's potential voting strength). Asked that each ~oven~in~ body appoint its elected official represen~.- tative~ and tentatively set September 30 as the Consortium Board's first meeting date. 'Asked the Executive Directors of the two Planning District Commissions~ along with any volunteers, to refine the draft Consortium Compact (legal,instrument) distributed on July 29~ and to circulate the revised compacl among the localities in the hopes that significant progress toward local adoption of a concurren~t_ legal instrument could be accom- pJished by September 30. On July 31~ ! received o copy of a memorandum from the Richmo,d Manager's Office outlining several suggested changes in the draft compact. 6 NOI~TH SlX'tH STREET, SUITE SOO, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 · PHONE (804) 644-8586 These changes proposed that: The Consortium be established and remain in effect upon the partici- pation of localities representing 90% of the population in the two Planning Districts. - The voting strength be changed to a formula more closely approxi- matlng one man-one vote. - Sections be added regarding appointment of alternate members~ quorums, and establishment of advisory committees. On August 2, as directed by the combined group, I met with Charles Turner, Executive Director of Crater Planning District Commission, to review the draft compact. After some discussion, I agreed to present to the Intergovern- mental Coordination Committee the following proposed changes: - Limit the duration of the Consortium to the 208 grant period. - Allow the Consortium Boardr on a two-thirds vote, to change the'weighted ~oting strength agreed upon on July 29. Add an administration and management section to a) place the Consortium offices within the Planning District Commissions, b) make the Consortium staff responsible.to the Executive Director 'in the Planning District Commission in which the "main office" is established, c)assign financial responsibilities to the Executive Director of the Plannlng Dislrict Commission in which the "subsidiary office" is established, d) eliminate other references in the July 29 draft to location of offices and equipment and combine other financing and budget matters infro the proposed new administration and management section · - Limit the localities' liability to 10°/8 of the EPA grant,~consistent with the grant award conditions. As you can tell from the points rai~ed by the City and Crater's Director, there- are significant points on which accbrd must be reached. I will have for the Committee on August 8 a revised draft compact incorporating all of these points. Hopefully, the discussion of such details will not be a Iong~ drawn out affair-- we Will certainly have many substantive issues to deal with as the 208 process leads us to future decision points. ! therefore suggest that the Committee ap- point a task force to deal with the details of compact refinement in order to allow a draft compact to be sent out to the localities by the middle of August. This will~ in turn, allow localities adequate time to consider such a compact before September 30. Amw ~_~ ~RiCHMOND REGIONAl_ PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION July ]7, 1974 MEMORANDUM TO: . FROM: SUBJECT: intergovernmental Coordination Committee Edward G. Councill, [![, Executive Director Notice of Grent Award, Section 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management PJanning On Jul; ]0, ! received oft!icial notice (enclosed~, that the Richmond-Crater Consortium had been av~ai, deda Section 208 grant totaling $949,690, bringing us one step closer to beginning the cooperative process we began c~iscussing least spt!rig. BeF. ore local governments consider tc:',ir~g the next step, however, 'there are several questlo~s which should be addressed: How should the Consortium be't:ormally organized? What shouJd the make--up of the policy board be, arid how .~hou[d the mar~agement ~tructure (~toff & consultants) be se~ up to avoid es~ob];~h]ng a~other bureaudracy and tc~ke full cdvantege of the two PDC's exist.[ng s~offs. (as suggested by commiltees in both PDC's)? The grant award conditions require that thc two-year grant period begin on the date which the grant is occepted~ which car~not be la,er thon JuJy 31, 1974 (unless an extension.is granted by the EPA Regional Admbistrotor).~ Th~s confIic~s w~, ~ ~he in~o~mot~on given ou~ by Howard MJJJer of EPA's PJ~ilodelphla Office at his meeJ'ing w~th local officials on June 7. At that time~ Mr. Miller stated that the two-year ~riod would begin o~ the d~fe of the th'st requisition by the Co~sorJium, which could be sometime this fall. In a felephoqe conversation prior to the receipt of t!~o JuJy ]0 letter, Mr. Miller reported that the project ~riod would have to beg?n on the d~te the grant was accepfe(~ arid that he was sorry to ~ove misinformed us. Given that most everyone involved recognizes that the two-year H~etc~bie ;s probably not achievabJe~ wha~ is the be,;f approach to getting an extension on the grant period? 6 NORTH SIXTH STREET, SUITE 800, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 · PHONE (804) 6~4-8~ Intergovernmental Coordination Committee July 16, 1974 Page 2 ... The grant award is significantly less than the $1,356,700 requested. In his advance phone call, Mr. Miller explained that EPA headquarters wanted additional documentation on some cost figures, and that there · was not.time to request such information prior to their June 30 deadline for disbursing funds. Therefore, the'grant amount-was reduced (the formal grant award letter, however, makes no mention of the reduction or the reasons for it). Mr. Miller suggested that a grant amendment request with appropriate documentation supporting the original grant request would be favorably received. Should the project proceed until or un~ess the originally requested grant amount is forthcoming? ! will be meeting with the Executive Director of the Crater PDC this week to firm up our recommendations on project management and the options for the Consortium organization. We' will also discuss possible courses of actian on the financing and time questions and request further information on this topic from EPA: I there- fore suggest that it would be appropriate for the committee to meet before the end of the mor~th and will suggbst fo your new Chairman that July 29 at noon would be an appropriate meeting day and time. Please hold this date open on your calendars. Confirmation of the meeting and further informal'ion will be forthcoming next week. EGC,III/dmc Enclosure UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 6TH AND WALNUT STREETS PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19106 JUL 8 1974 CERTIFIED Re: P003084-01 Richmond-Crate~ Consortium Mr. Edward G. Councill, III Acting Treasurer Richmond-Crater Consortium 701E. Franklin Straet SUite 810 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Mr. Councill: We are pleased to inform you of the award of an Areawide Waste Treatmenn Management Planning Grant as described in your application dated April 29, 1974. This award is made under Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended. The grant award is for an amount not to exceed $949,690, and is subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement and the applicable provisions of 40 CFR, Parts, 30, 35, and 126. The original and two copies of 'the Agreement are. enclosed. The Agreement must be executed within twenty-one days of your receipt. The executed document should be forwarded by certified mail to our Grants Administration Branch at the above address. We are looking fo~ard to working with you and the Consortium in this program. The EPA project officer, is Mr. Eugene A. Mattis, Regional Economist. If any. questions arise, please'do not hesitate to call on us. Enclosure Sincerely yours, U.S, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY GRANT 1'40, o. R A N T X C R E E ~a E N T ?oO3084-O 1 (.~ge in';lrt.,ctirJr~,%' t,e/ore oD.wp/cling /OKra. NOTE: ~e Grant Agreement musl be completed in duplicate and returned tu the Grants Administration Diviqion for ]leadquarler~ grant awards and to thc (;raut~ Administration Bnmches for State and local assistance grant 'awards within 3 wcckx after receipt or witl3in any cxlensinn of tinu as may be granted by [~PA. Except as may be otherwise provided, no coxiq may be incurred prior to lhe cxecutiofi of thc Grant AgTeemcnl by panics lherclo. Receipt of a written refusal, failure h~ rclum the prnpetly executed document within lhe prescribed time, w~l tesuh in lilt, anlomatic termination of considetalion of the grant Gl fei by the Agency. Any arllcudmenl ID thc Grant Agreement by the grantee subsequent lo thc docu~nt being signed by the Award Official shall void thc Granl Agreement. '"~A~T I " GEN¢RAt_ IN[ORMATION 1. , GRANT ADMINISTRATION DATA 2. APPROPRIATION AND ACCOUNTING DATA 33 DSO ~288 et. ~e~.~ 40 0~9~ 30~3~;~6 68X0~08 43840393~ ~ea~de Waste Treatment Management Pl~[~g t1.51 ~. AWARD APPROVAL OFFICE 4 ISSUING OFFICE 0~iee o~ ~be Ae~io=~ A~s~r&~o2 ~r ~ W&~er ~o~s ~i~isio~ ii ~.S. ~1ro~e~ ~o~eo~io~ Age, cz U.S. ~i~o~e~ ~o~eo~io~ Age~o~ ~Z~eZ~&, ~e~s~Z~ 19106 ~Z&~e~&, ~e~sT1~ 19106 5. PROJECT OFFICER ¢t,'{'dcr,fl ~uge~e A. ~1s ~.S. ~o~.e~ ~o~eo~1o~ ~e~o~ c..e~.o~u ~,~.c. ~,,,~,,,~.~ ..... Cod.. O~tis B~l~ng, 6th ~d W~nut Streets 215-597-9288 P~ladelp~a~ Pe~sylv~a 19106 ~- G~ ANT~ E O~GAN I Z ATI ON ~c~ond-Orater Consorti~ ~c~ond-Crater Consorti~ c/o ~c~ond Region~ Plying Dist. Co~ 70~ E. Fr~.:lin. St., S~te 81.0 ~Ot~ond~ Virginia 2S219 . . Edw~d G. Co~cill~ III ~c~ond-Crater Consorti~ ~' ~'~= c/o ~c~ond Region~ Pl~ng Dist. Co~. Acting Treas~er 701 E. Fr~lin Street, S~te 810 c. ,~r~.o~ ~u~...~-,,,u~. a~,.~ co,,~ ~c~ond, Virgi~a 23219 804-6~-8586 8, AMOUNT 9 DURAT /~I~l~rOv~d Rr~ ~mol~tiI ot Port I ~ (~),,Lall he ~"" "') . $949,~9o si~ing _ c. ~u,~,-,~ ~r~,., o~,,~,],o~ N/A T~ ye~s co~encing ~th si~ng of lO. PAYMENT METHOD l1 PAYEE ~ ,~,~-~:,, ~ ~o~ ~cting Treas~er : o,.t, See P~t IV, Speci~ Provisions ~ P~ent Sched~e Ric~ond-Crater Consorti~ c/o t~c~ond Region~ Pl~g Dist. Co~.. ~1. E. ~r~li~ $t., Suite 810 EPA Fo,m 5700.20 (10-72} FORM APPROVED II APPHOVED BUDGET TABLE A -- COST CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION (/~on-c o/l,,, truc ,,' ~UDGET PERIOD COST GRANT AMOUNT I. ~ERSONNEL ~ ~o~,~ ~ 76,000 76~000 ~ " 55,39o 55~39o ~. ~o~,,o~ 786,800 786,800 ~. ~o~ o,~_~, ~o~ N/A N/A 949,690 949,690. TABLE.B - PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION TABLE C - PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION NOTE: alLrccnc~t set forth in thc sub.Net docmucnt shall be applicable to thc total ofallcost carol:Dry/program clement cla~sifical]ons OF J:'~ AND ACCEPTANCE PART III Thc United St:lies Gl' America, ~lcting by and thlough thc U.S. Environmental Protection A~ency (EPA), hereby offers a ?:mt to thc ~c~ond-Crater Consortia, Mo~ond~ Va. for ~00 .9¢ of all.approved costs up lo and not 'exceeding GRAN YEE ORL~/~NIZ~ YION ' $g&9oj~_ixm, 690r AMOUNT for the support Gl apt~rovcd budget period effort described in application {including all application m~lificatiott0 ~eg~de Wgste Trea~ent M~ag~enty!~ng Progr~, Apr. 29~197~dudca herein by reference. TIfEE ~XNO DATE 'fids (;rant Agreement is subject lo ;H~plicable U.S. l:n~iJt,nmcntaJ Pmlcclion AFcncy statuatory provisions, grant rcgukllions {40 CFR, Chapter 1, Subchaptcr B) and of lhc provismns of this agreement {l'crt$ I thrtt IU). 'lhe (;rantee Orm ~ z ~tion also aerec, lhat I'und~ awarded ~]11 be used solely for thc Im~l,O~cs Gl the prelect . 7JIE UNITED SFA]ES OF AR,1EI~ICA []Y 1'HE LJ.S. ENVI'~)NN1EN'FAL PHOI'ECTION A~;ENCY 5IGNATU[tE T YF'L.O NAML, AND TII'Lti DATE EPA For,, 5700.20 /1g.72~ /P,,.. 2~ ~~ ...... . ...... PART IV - SPECIAL PROVISIONS A. Description of Study Project The study project consists of the development of an Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan for the area encompassed by the 'jurisdiction of the 15th and the 19th Planning District-Commissions of The Commonwealth of Virginia. The eligible project Costs include the allowable associated costs as defined in 40 CFR 35.1062~ and 40 CFR 30.701, up to the amounts shown in Part II of the Grant Agreement. B. Schedule of Grant Payments The grantee may submit requests for payment for allowable costs in accordance with the following schedule: Payment. No. Date Payment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (Final) Cumulative Amount (not to be exceeded) .July 1974 $ 94,900 $ 94,900 October 1974 108,500 203,400 January 1975 108,500 311.900 April 1975 108,500 420,400 July 1975 108,500 528,900 October 1975. 108,500 637,400 January 1976 108,500 7~5,900 April 1976 108,500 854,400 July 1976 95,290 949,690 Payments will be made in accordance with reports to be submitted by the grantee relating costs incurred to tasks completed pursuant to 40 CFR 35.1059. Ail payments are subject to Congressional appropriations and availability of funds. C. Special Conditions The completion time for the study is limited to two years from the date of the acceptance of the grant offer. D. General Conditions This grant agreement must be executed by the grantee within 21 days of receipt unless an extension is approved by the Regional Administrator. This grant agreement is subject to Environmental Protection Agency General Grant Regulations (Title 40, Part 30, published in the Federal Register, Vol. 36, No. 229, November 27, 1971), Environmental Protection Agency Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning Agencies Grant Regulations (Title 40, Part 35, published in the Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 93, May 13, 1974), Environmental Protection Agency Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning Area and Responsible Planning Agencies Regulations (Title 40, Part 126, published in the Federal Register, Vol. 38, No. 178, September 14, 1973), and · applicable appendices to the aforementioned. An amount not to exceed 10 percent of the grant award amount may be withheld for noncompliance with a program objective, grant condition or reporting requirement. Representat?on oF Localities on Planning D~strict Commissions in PD's 15 and 19 PD 15 Charles City 1 I Goochl'and 2 I Hanover 4 -~ Henrico 5 P New Kent 1 I Powha tan 2 / Richmond 5 II 20 Chesterfield PD 19 Colonial Heights** Dinwiddi e Emporia Greensvill e Hopewell Petersburg Prince George Surry · Sussex ~ 2 2-- 3 2 2 3 4 ~- 3 2 2 *Number oF representatives on RRPDC which Chesterfield would have under current representation Formula. **Locality has not passed a resolution o[ intent to join in. Section 208 water quality planning. Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD 4010 West Broad Street -' ~ :, ' '~, ' , -~" ,~ ~ " P. O. Box 6616 ~., ~ ,~ ~ ,,.~ ~ ~_ ,, . ~5.~ % .... ~ ;OARD MEMBERS ' ~ ~ LO - C~/ Ray W. EdwaMs (804) 770-5401 "~- ~. ~/ Chairman J. LeoBo~a~ September 1t, 1974 Wa~enL. Braun Denis J. Brion Bas~ T. Ca~ody Mrs. Wayne Jackson Andrew W. MeThe~a, Jr. Dear Mr. Burnett: SUBJECT: James River Basin Comprehensive Water Resources Plan The State Water Control Board recently initiated a Comprehensive Water Resources Plan for the James River Basin. This investigation, which began in July, 1974, will continue for a period of 18 months during which time a plan will be developed to manage the water resources of the basin. The primary purpose of this plan is to develop various alternative solutions in the areas of water supply for domestic and industrial use, among others; flood control; navigation; power and recreation. In order to accomplish these objectives, the plan will adopt such measures to include low flow management, treatment facilities, sewage collection systems, reservoir storage and conservation practices, etc., to provide adequate water supply and to preserve the water quality in the basin for the well-being of human population, aquatic life and wild life. The final results of this plan will include institutional and financial ar- rangements for the management of water resources and will determine the impact of various alternative solutions on the environment. The plan which will be developed will hopefully reflect man's total needs and will consider various elements to include future industrial development, transportation and land use, etc.' You should have in your files, copies of the Planning Bulletins entitled "James River Basin Comprehensive Water Resources Plan" (Volumes I-IV, Addendum) for your information. If you are in need of the above bulletins, please request copies from this office. In the development of the ongoing plan, we intend to use these reports extensively in addition to other available reports pertinent to this endeavor. Any comments or suggestions you may have which you feel will better enable us to develop a useful and successful plan, are welcome. Page Two James River Basin Comprehensive Water Resources Plan September 11, 1974 We plan to hold a public meeting late in the month of November, 1974, in order to enlighten the various communities within the Piedmont Region (State Water Control Board) of the James River Basin, as to the purpose and goal of this plan. However, if you desire to meet with us prior to this tentative date, or if you have ~ny questions, please feel free to contact Dr. K. C. Das or me. Sincerely, ~./3. Ci~u~a, ~ireccor Piedmont Regional Office Enclosure /sa On motion of ~f~ , seconded by/~ ~ , the following resolution ~ adopted: Be it resolved by the Chesterfield County Board of Super- visors that the responsibility for the continuing, comprehensive, and coordinated transportation planning process for the northern portion of the County be and hereby:'is delegated to the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission; and Be it further resolved that Chesterfield's costs of the process shall be based on its proportionate share of the popula- tion within the study area based on the most current estimates; and Be it fmrther resolved that the ChairmanAof the Board of Supervisors ~eChereby empowered to execute on agreement with the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission for this process for the Richmond Region subject to county land use maps provided to the Commission ~ at a scale of 1" = 4000'. ND REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION Mr. Michael C. Ritz Director of Planning Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 September 12, 1974 Dear Mr. Ritz: Enclosed with this letter is a copy of a preliminary draft of an agreement between the County and the RRPDC covering the 3-C Transportation Planning process. This agreement is intended to replace the existing lo- cal agreement . Such replacement is necessitated by changes in the trans- portation planning process, required in part by the 1973 Federal Aid High- way Act. The agreement calls for a formal resolution, which presently exists for all the participating jurisdictions except Chesterfield County. This agreement is intentionally more:specific than previous agreements in order to hope- fully avoid some of the confusion that has existed in the past. In parti- cular, an article on funding is being included in order to allow the County to accurately analyze this agreement in terms of work load and relmburse- ment. The agreement also specifies the working relationships between the RRPDC and the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation so that an understanding exists as to how the County's responsibilities fit into the entire transportation planning process. It is recognized that this proposed local agreement is a draft only. We welcome your comments and suggestions for changes. However we will be attempting to maintain as much uniformity between the agreements 6 NOF~TH SIXTH STREET. SUITE ~00, RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 2:3219 · PHONE (80.4) 644-858,6 Mr. Michael C. Ritz September 12, 1974 Page 2 with each jurisdiction as is possible. Es,p.,e~ially in data requirements, there will be a significant time and cost savings .~r all concerned if relative uniformity can be obtained. In the case of Cheste,,r, fi'eld County~ this agreement should also address local funding of RRPDC azefi.vities From Chesterfield County. Based on our estimates for fiscal year 197~, the total local funds necessary for transportation activities is $11,485. This is based on $586 in local dollars needed to match federal funds and $10,899 in straight local dollars. Our estimate of Chesterfield's share of this cost is $1,500. Reference of this should be made in the agreement, once agreed upon. Chesterfield County, also because of its unique situation, does not presently have a valid resolution. A sample resolution has been enclosed with this letter. If I can be of assistance in this regard, please let me know. Very truers, Edward G. C Executive Director EGC, II I/tls Enclosures Board of Supervisors County of Goochland Goochland, Virginia Resolution At a regular meeting of the Goochland County Board of Supervisors held in the County Courtroom at Goochland Courthouse at 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, February Is 1972, the following, action was ~taken: Present: Vo~t~: Earl H. Henley, Chairman Dr. James H. Bowles Lawrence B. Nuckols Andrew W. Pryor James T. Taylor Presiding (no vote c~st) Yea Yea Yea Yea On motion of Doctor Bowles, seconded by Mr. Nuc~ols, and carried without objection, the following resolution was adopted: BE IT RESOLVED by the Goochland County Board of Supervisors this first day ~of February, 1972 that the responsib~Iity for the continuing, comprehen- sive, and coordinated transportation planning process be and is hereby dele- gated to the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Goochland County Board of Supervisors be and is hereby empowered to execute an agreement with the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission for a continuing, comprehen- sive and coordinated transportation planning process for the Richmond Region. s/Earl H. Henley Earl H. Henley, Chairman A COPY TESTE: 'l'h]s agreement is made this day of 1974~ between thc County of Chesterfield (hereinafter celled the "County") and the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission of Planning Dish'ict ]:i£teen (15), (here[na£ter called the "Commission"). WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan Area is in need of an b~proved mass transit system in order to imp,'ove transportation accessibility a. nd efficiency; WHEREAS ~ short range transit plann[ng technical assistance is needed by the suburban Counties ot: Chesterfield and Henrico; ~ WHEREAS, the availability ot: short range transit planning technical assistance at this time w~ll make possible a refined input into the five yeai' transit development program; and, -... WHEREAS, Task 2.21 of the ."1975 Unified Transportation Work Program: 'i'he Richmond Region" established a funded activity for a short range transit planning activity oriented to the transit needs of the suburban Counties. NOW THEREFORE, the pm'ties hereto 'mutually covenant and agree ea'ch with the other as ~ollows: Dural-ion Th~s agreement shat run for the duration oF the short range transitpicmnhqg work acl~vJt[es. TJ~eso a¢l'JvJties will commence November 1, 1974 and terminate March 29, 1975. 'i'ermTnalion 'i'his a.greement may J)o terminatod by 30 days written no~Jce by one par~y to the olher. Upon tcm~inal'ion the County shall be paid [or all services per- .-formed under this agreement until date of lermination. Obligations of commission o. Commission agrees to pay lhe total amount of $1,600 in poss-througl~ fun'ds from the Urban Mass Tronsportotlon Administrotion to .the County · for the services to be perFo~Tned by the. County os hereh~after described. b. The Commission agrees to assist the County in the preparation of the data necessary for analyzing short range .transit alternahves, as outlined in the attached work program. · c. The Commission agrees to provide technical and stat~[ support for the project through technical analysis utilizing but not limited to transit network analysis and mode split analysis, as outlined in the attached work program. The Commission as the UMTA designated planning agency will manage the.stt~dy.- This responsibility will include: 1) managing the financial aspects of the study, 2) submitting to UMTA quarterly and final reports, 3) providing liaison between participating agencies, 4) establishing and keeping records of meetings~ 5) retaining a consultant for this study, 6)'- managing the work of the consultant, as outlined in the attached work pro- gram, and 7) preparing the t:inal report. The Commission will report the progress of the study to the Transportation Policy Committee so that the Committee can monilor and certify the satis- factory completion of the study. · ! 4. Obllgc~l'ions oF Jhe County The County~ hereby agrees to: o. Prepare proposed transit proiects For onolys'is including suggestions for modes, local'ion and routing~ os outlined in the attached work program. Be responsible For the development oF I'he data necessary for analyzing the short range transit alternatives proposed, as outlined in the attached work program. Attend frequent technical meetings which will be held throughout the duration of ihe study. The purpose of these meet]ngs will be to set the dk-dction of the study, to propose and refine altematives fo'r analys~s and to review the results oi: that analysis, as outl[nad in the attached work progra~.~. Provide amounts not to exceed $400.00 of in-kind services or cash fror~ itselt: or al-her eligible sources as local contributions to this project. e. Comply in all respects with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964- os amended. l~. The Count~.shali maintain records on this project that are consistent with generally accepted accounting procedures. g. The County shall permit the authorized representatives of the U. S. Department of Transportation and the Comptroller General al: the United States to inspect and audit all data and records of the County relating to its performance under this contract. No member of or delegate to the Congress ot: the United States will be admitted to any share or part of this contract or to any benefit arising therefrom. No member, officer or employee of i-he public body or of o public body during his tenure or for one year thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this contract or the proceeds thereof. Thls agreement is the entire understanding of the parties for this project - and ~o"part hereot: shall be walved~ altered or modified except'by a written amendment sLgned by properly authorized representatives o1: the parties hereto. 6. This agreement shall be governed by the laws and statutes of the State of Virginia and shall not be assigned by. either parry without the written con- sent of the other party. The Undersigned represent that they are the properly authorized person to execute thls agreement for each party hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused their names to be signed hereto - and their seals affixed and attested by their duly authorized officers a['l as at: the date firs:t above, written. - Arrest: County of Chesterfield 'County Administrator Attest: Richmond Regional Planning District Commission By Executive Director (~ ~ 0 .73 -'~ 0 c C) ', C-) © :0 0 0 0 0 0 _-;.". 0 -0 2.1 .o ~ -<: Cl<C cl~ c ~.z] CZ): 0 0 .c._) C_3 0 (~ Q ~ 0 0 0 0.7. ® CO tO 0 0 0 .-~ 0 0 Jr~ J~ C~ Z This agreement is made this 25thday of Sept. 1974, between the County of Chesterfield (hereinafter called the "County") and the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission alr Planning District Fifteen (15)t (hereinafter called the "Commission"). WHEREAS, the Richmond Metropolitan Area is in need of an improved mass transit system in order to improve transportation accessibility and efficiency; WHEREASt short range transit planning technical assistance is needed by the suburban Counties of Chesterfield and He.nrico; WHEREASt the availability ot: short range transit planning technical assistance at this rime'will make possible a refined input into'the five yeaf transit development program; a~d, WHEREASt Task 2.21 ot: the "1975 Unified Transportation Work Program: The Richmond Region" established a funded activity fqr a short range transit p. lonnlng activity oriented to 'the transit n_eeds of the suburban Counties. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually covenant and'agree each with the other as follows: Duration Th'is agree'meier s'h~ll run for the duration of the short ,'ange transit planning work activities. These c~ctivities will commence November 1, 1974 and terminate March 29, 1975. 2. Termination This agreement may be terminated by 30 days written notice by one party ~o the other. Upon termination the County shall be paid fOr all services per- · formed under this agreement until date of te~Tninatlon. 3. Obligations of Commission a. Commission agrees to pay the total amount of $1~600 in pass-through funds from the Urban Mass Transportation Administration to the County for the services to be performed .by the County as hereinafter described. b. The Commission agrees to assist the County in the preparation of the data necessary for analyzing short range transit .alternatives, as outlined in the attached work program. c. The Commission agrees to provide tecl~nlcal and staff support for the project through technical analysis utilizing but not limited to transit network analysis and mode split dnalysis, as outlined in the attached work program. The Commission as the UMT~ designated planning agency'wi`ll rear, age the study. This responsibility will include: 1) managing the financial aspects of the study, 2) submit, ting to U'MTA quarterly and final reports, 3) providing liaison between l~rtJcipating'agencies' 4) estabJish]~g and keeping records of meel'ings~ and 5) mcmoging the walk of the consultant~ as outlinecl in the attached work program. The Commissio~ will report the progress of the study to the Transportation Policy Committee so that the Committee can monitor and certify the satis- factory compleX'ion of the study. 4. obligations o'f t'he County Ihe C.ounty~ here.by a'.grees to: "a. Prepare proposed transit projects [or analysis including suggestions for modes, location and routing, as outlined in the attached work program. Be responsible for the development of the-data necessary for analyzing the short range transit alternatives pr.oposed,, as outlined in the-attached work program. Attend frequent technical meetings which will be held throughout the' duration of the study. The purpose of these meetings will be to set the direction of tl~e study~ to propose and refine alternatives t:or analysis and to review the results of that analysis, as outlined in the attached work program. Provide ambunts n'ot to exceed $400 of in-kind services or cash from itself or other eligible sources as local contributions to this project. Comply in all respects with Title VI ofithe Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended. 5. This agreement is the entire understanding o[ the parties .[or this project and no part hereof shall be waived, altered or modified except, by a written amendment signed by properly authorized representatives of the parties hereto. 6. This agreement shall bp govel-.ned by the laws and statutes of the State of Virginia and shall not be a.ssigned by either party without the written con- sent of the other party. 7. The Undersigned represent that they are the properly authorized person to execute this agreement for each party hereto. 'IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties' hereto Ir'ave caused their names to be signed hereto and their seals affixed bnd attested by their duly authorized officers all as ot: the date first above wrltten.. -4- Attest: County of Chesterfield County Admi'~istrator Chairman · Attest: Richmond Regional Planning District Commission' By Executive Di rector March 3, 1975 Mr. Michael C. Ritz, Director of Planning Chesterfield County Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mike: Enclosed are revised copies of the proposed local agreements for the 3-C transportation planning process. They include the changes in the data collection procedure as adopted by the Transportation Policy Committee at its January meeting. The mailout of these contracts has also been delayed by the discussion initiated by the Highway Department regarding the reorganization of the Transportation Policy Committee. Since this issue has evidently been resolved, we are proceeding with the processing of this contract. You will note that this contract no longer specifies the dollar amounts for reimbursement of data work as previous draft contracts did. As recommended, this dollar amount will be determined on an annual basis by the Unified Work Program process. In addition, the work program process is envisaged as a major opportunity to improve the planning process described in the enclosed contract. If you have further questions, please contact William Steinmetz of the RRPDC staff. If not, R_lease execute both copiers of Lhe enclosed contracts. Please retain one copy for your file and return one to RRPJ~C. Please keep in mind that this contract is intended to be a flexible document. Changes and improvements to it will be welcome on a continuing basis. ours, Edward G. Councill, III Executive Director Enclosures EGC:dgm 6 NORTH SIXTH STREET, SUITE SOO. RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 · PHONE (804) 644-8S66 AN AGREEMENT FOR A CONTINUING, COMPREHENSIVE~ AND COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS FOR THE RICHMOND REGION THIS AGREEMENT made this 16 day of April in the year nineteen hundred and seventy--five (1975) by and between the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission hereinafter called the Commission and the County of Chesterfield hereinafter called the County. The County has, by resolution of its governing body on~,~ S21~.'r 197~I~, delegated the responsibility roi the Continuing, Comprehensive, and Coordinated Transportation Planning Process to the Commission. NOW THEREFORE~ the Commission and the County agree as follows: ARTICLE i - LOCATION OF STUDY The study shall include the area contained in the political jurlsd[ctions of the City of' Richmond, and portions of Henrico and Chesterfield Counties. Also included is part of the Dover District ;n Gooch- land County and parts of Hanover County and shall hereinafter be called the Study Area. The boundaries at: the Study Area may be adiusted by agreement between the Virginic~ Departrme.qt of Highways end Transportation (hereinafter called the Department) and the Commission providbd that the ~rec~ included in the boundaries shall not be less than the Urbanized area defined by the U.S. Bureau of Census. ARTICLE II - LENGTH OF STUDY The Richmond Regional Area Transportation Study as suppolced by resofufions of the Part[clpatln9 Jurlsd[ctions will be established on a continuing basis by the Participating Jurisd]ctlons, the Com- mission, and the Department. The Agreement between t'he Commi-~slon and the County ~vill terminate oniy where 1) Sectio~ 134, Title 23, U.S. Code, previou:~ly cited here~n, is repealed or amended by Congress ' of the Unlted States to no Io,~ger require the cont]nulng~ comprehens]ve~ and coordinated Iransp'or- teflon planning process~ or 2) 3) The Commission withdraws from tile cont~nu]ngr comprehenslve~ and coordinated transportation plan- ning process agreement witl~ the Departrnent~ or The County withdraws from tl, e cont;inu]ng~ comprehenslve¢ and coordinated transportation planning process with no less than ninety (90) days written notice to the Commission¢ or 4) The Commission withdraws its representation of tile County in the continuing, comprehensive~ and co- ordinal'ed transportation plannh]g process with no less than ninety (90) days written notice to ti~e County. , 'ARTICLE III TP~NSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE The Transporter]on Policy Co~mittee will be established by the Commission !o guide the continuing, com- prehensive~ and cooperative transportation planning p!'o~ess. The Transporl'a!ion Policy CommiH-ee will be composed of one policy representative and two technical re?resentatives From each i)art'icipati~g juris- dic'tion within the Sludy Area who will be.appointed by the local governing body to represent their local government as voting members. There sba'il also be one voting member designated by and representing each o1: the followTng agencies: (1) the Virginia Department of Highways and Transporl'at]on, (2) the Richmond Metrop01itanAuthority~ and (3) the Greater Richmond Transit Company. There shall be one non-voting member des[gnai'ed by and representing each of the following agencJes~ if lhe agencies so de- sire. (1) the State Division of Planning and Community Al't:alrs~ ~'2) the Federal Highway Admin[stration~ (3) tile Department of Housing and Urban Development, (,t.) the Federal Aviation Adm~nlstration, and such &itizen pari'icipation as recommended by the appropriate localities. The County agrees to formally designate one policy representative, and two te~:hnicc;I representatives to 'be active members of the Trbnsportation Policy Committee. The County also agrees to appoint appropriale citizen represenlalivos t~ t'l~e Commltt'ee.. ARTICLE IV-FUNCTIONS OF THE TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE Tho Transportation Policy Commiltee will i) establish policy {'or tho cot~tinuing~ comprt:hei~sivo~ and -3.- cooperative transportation planning process; 2) review the Long Range Transporlation Plan on an annual basis; 3) determine when a reevaluation of the Transportation Plan is necessary; 4) review the results of the reevaluation; 5) recommend appropriate action by the Commission and the Department'; 6) review re- quests for study area boundary changes; 7) review systems proposals requJred by the Federal and Slate agencies; 8) review and approve the annual unified work program; 9) det'erm]ne Ihe influence of current' data upon the TransportaHon Plan in relation to previous data and proiected trends; 10) cooperate in the development of tl~e procedures for the collection ot: traffic data arid reassignment of traffic; 11) work with jhe Staffs of the Commission and the De?artment; 12) meet at leastmontl~ly when Ihe agenda warranf's~ os determined by the Chairman,. to revlew~ comment/ recommend, and assist Ihe Deportment~ participating political jurisdlctJons~ or the Commission on any proposal~ alternate lines~ and work perfo~Tnod on the location and design of I:acilJtles [n the Transportation Plan. The Transportation Policy Commie-tee will be chah'ed by a member of the Commission aRpointed by the Chc~irman of the Commission. A Vice-Chairman will be selected by members of the Committee. Appoint-- ments to the Transportatio~ Policy Committee shall be filled by persons trained and knowledgeable ]n transportation planning or what by their poslt~on have an interest and responsibility in the local transpor- tation planning process. APLTICI. E V - FUNCTIONS OF THE COMMISSION AND THE CITY The Commission assumes the r.esponslbil~ty of scheduling and holding meetings of the 'Fransporl'at~on Policy Committee and Sub-Committees; preparing minutes of all official meetings of the Transport'orlon Policy Committee and distributing the minutes to pc~l'ic~pating agencies; processing in a timely manner all plans~ plan revlslons~ projects~ data projectJons~ agreements~ highway syst'ems~ or other docume~t's through the local governing bodies For approval; l)arlJcipating in special studies underl'aken by lhe Deparlment upon the request of the Department to the extent budget and personnel limitations will allow as determined by ti~e 'Executive Director of th'e Commission; preparing the annual Unified Work P~'ogram as required by the Federal I-lighway Administration; assisting with I'he p,'eparatJon of the transportation planning process annual report; reporling significant ci~anges in socJoeconomic and lar, d use data; and~ .assJsting with the compilation of I'ranslt inveniory and parl<~ng h~ventory data. ~ Furt'her~ it Js h]~l)e,'a~Jve t1~at tho socioeconomic and land uso ~orecas~s For the Count), be approved by t-t~e Transportat[on Policy Committee and tho County prior to -4- ..~ubm~sslon to the Virginia Deparlm. ent of Highways and Transportation, The. CommlssJon and the Cou.nty hereby jointly assume the responsibility for providing the socioeconomic and land use data ne'cessary for the cont'inu~ng transportation planning process. This data and all other information will be de.veloped · according to the following methodology. DATA A. COLLECTION Planning Data - Annual 'Changes in urban developmeht are to be recorded annually based upon increases or decreases in land use~ population~ and economic data. The magnitude and location of these changes are to be recorded on a traffic zone basis for the entire Sl'udy Area. The surveillance oi: urban development for tho Study Area will be conducted by the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission through t'he collection of relevant' data. All quantit'at]ve data collected by the R]chmond Regional Planning District Commlss~on will be reviewed for co~'~pleteness and accuracy by. i'he Department~ and it: l:ound to be mutually unacceptable to t-he Commission and t'he Depart- The ment~ it will be revised'. Maximum use will be made of 1970 and future census dal'a. 't:ollowing is a list of ihe specific [t'ems to be recorded annua!ly, for each traffic zone: POPULATIO~"J - developed by l'he County a. Total b. ~Group Quarters (dorrnitory-schoo], military borracl<s~ el-c.) EMPI_OYMENT - developed by the Commission RETAIL SALES - develol~ed by the Commission Tj~e CornmJssJon will update the retail sales business IJsting ot~t'aJned from the Department of Taxal']on as well as the consolidated business Iisi' on an' annual basis. However~ the actual reta]l sales dollar values will not be reported annually. I.AND USE (acres) - developed by the County a. Single family (includes l'railers) · b. Multiple family (includes duplexes) c. Group Quarters d. Cobmerclal (retail~ services~ I:inance, ]nsurance~ real estate) ' e, Industrial (light and heavy; Iruck l'erminols~ wholesale~ contract conslruction services) f. Public and Semi-Public (hospilals~ sanil'orlums~ libraries~ federal~ State~ local ad- m h~]st'ration, schools ~ recreal lanai ~ etc.) g, Miscellaneous (l'rar~sportotion l'em~Jnals~ rJghls-oF-ways~ ul]JJt]es~ com'municolio~s~ and i)arkJ~g lois and 9arages~ et'c,) -5- h. Vacant (agrlcuJture'~ forestry, other vacant land) ~. Waler Areas Maps and/or overlays sI~owlng the ex]st]ng land use and changes will be provided at a scale V~00'. This data will also be summarized.in acres by traffic zone. LAND DEVELOPMENT POLICY - this information will be collected by the County. Changes in land development policy are to'berecc;rcJed eno continuing basis. These changes are to be identified by recor'd[ng such significant items as new zoning ordinances or signifi- cant changes in ~xist[ng ordinance~ flood control projectsr urban renewal proiects~ water and sewer programs~ efc. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION - mechanisms for cil'izen involvemenl' will b~ maintained by the ,, Commission. Citizen input will be so'ught at all stages of the pl6nning process. Methods to be used to inform 'the public and obtain public views may include use of the annual report~ newspapers~ radio and television~ ~;nd the holding of public meetlngs~ and organization of' citizen co~,~.mittees. ADDRESS CODING GUIDE and I'he Commission. · - this informal'ion will be maintained iointly by i-he County This document' will be kept current in order to facilitate accurate retrieval of all data. ginning with fiscal year 1976 the County will report the changes in street actdresses. The changes will be reported relative to lhe r~ost recent version of' the Address Coding Guide. The Com- mission will supply the fen-ns for providing this inl"om~ation. The Commission will review and process this data and provide copies of the document to all inl'erested agencies. PLANNING DATA - FIFTH YEAR Tl~e following is a list of tl~e specific items lo be recorded ever)~ fifth year~ beginning wilh 1975~ for each traffic zone~ and the methods to be employed in obtainlng quant]tative data for each. HOUSING UNITS - developed by lhe County a. Single family (ii~ctudes trailers) b. Mulllpte family (includes duplexes) "6-' Total The change in housing un]ts is to be measured by keeping a record of building F)m'mits~ occupancy permits (it: available) and demoliHon permits. These records are to be sl'rati- fled by single family and mull'if)lo family units. The previously developed'zonal housing unit counts will then be adiusted.based upon these changes. POPULATION - Developed by ti~e County a. Total b. Group Quarters (dormitory-schools, military barracks, etc.) Total population will normally be estimated based upon the change in housing units and the application of approprJate occupancy ratios~ andt~eaddltionoF Group Quarters population. ThepopulaHon in group quarters is tobe identiEiedsepgrately by traffic zones. AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP -develof)ed by the Commission 'To be determined From automobile registration data supplied to 'local Commissioners of Revenue by ti~e State Division of Motor Vehicles. An up-~o-.date address coding guide is to be prepared and used in relating addresses to the appropriate traffic zone. The application of i]isl'orical zonal trends For automobiles per housing unit~ or automobiles per person can be utilized; hoWever~ the totals must becor~pared to jurisdictional automobile regi'stratlons. Census data may be used~ but it must be supplemented with aui'omob[le data for group quarters. EMPLOYMENT - developed by the Commission To be determined by industrial classification For each traffic zone utilizing official Slate and local r~cords including the Virginia Employment CommJsslon's Records. An up-to-dal'e address coding guide is to be prepared and used in relating addresses to approf)riata traffic zones. Postal mall route maps will be utilized~ where available~ to aid in relating addresses to Iraffic Zones o RETAIL SALES - developed by the Commission a.' Shopper .. !,. Convbnience c. Total -7- To be determined fi'om records of lhe A.B.C. Board and the State Department of Taxation. An Ul~-to-date address coding guide is to be prepared and used in relating addresses to the approprlote traffic zones. STUDENTS aa b. BY ZONE OF scHOOL - developed by the County Grades 1 - 12 College Total " School attendance data is to be obtained from local school board, college and technical school records, LAND USE (acres) - developed by County TO be stratified as si~o'wn previously in the items to be collected annually TRAFFIC DATA Traffic data will be collected annually by the Deparl'ment unless otherwise specified and will ~ons]st o~ the following: 1. TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDIES ~ An annual count program has been established to determine average daily traffic volumes and to identify the peaking characteristics of traffic for each existing llnk or segments of the network.' This could i'nclude classification and car occupancy counts. THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM INVENTORY .. The inventory of the existing thoroughfare system will be.updated annually 1'o determine what changes have been made. following for each segment: Segment description b. Jurisdiction c. Administrative Classi[~cal'~on d. Functional Classification Typicaf Sect'ion fo Parking Condit'Jons This inventory sl~all include~ but is not limited to, lbo g. Operating Speeds and Delays TRANSIT INVENTORY An annual review el: the transit system will be conducted to determine changes or 6ddil'ions to the existing transit system and an inventory off ride[ship as available l:rom the records of the transit agencies, The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission will provide this annual review with the ass]sta:..ce ot: the Greater Richmond Tra~sit Company and the suburban transit carriers, MAJOR GENERATOR SURVEILLANCE The staffs el: the regional agencies and participating jurisdictions have been requested to pro- vide lists of site plans and associated data and/or the actual site plans and associated data regard- ing planne'~t major generators which affect the major tho[ought:are plan. This serves as input to the Departments data retrieval system. Studies to determine the el:t:ecf el: extensive tral:fic engineering improvements upon the Trans- portation Plan. · Small sample origin-dest[nat]on studies as necessary to calibrate mathematical models and check trip generation and attraction parameters. Envh'onmental Overview el: socioeconomic and environmental e[fl:ects at the system and project levels will be conducted in accordance wilh the Department's Acl'ion Plan. I1o An' anhual report will be made available containing a quantitative summary, el: surveillance items. Also included in the annual repo,'t will be comments on plan implementation with respect to a particular staging period, Construction projects[ either undertaken or completed, which are not consistent with the plan are to be included, The pattern el: land development and ils con- sist'ency with tt!e land use plan is to be included in the annual report, FORECASTS A, Planning Dal'a 'l'he planning data~ which will serve as inputs to the tra[frlc model will be re[forecast every [five (5) years, Forecasts are tobomade twenly-five (25) years lnlo the' [future in order to maintain · lwenty(~0) year deslgn data at all times, The proposedmelhodso[f forecasting Ihe planning data will be presented to the Transportation Policy Committee and the Deparlmeht [for review and recommendation; if foun~J to be mutually unacceptable to the Comn~itl'ee and the I)eparlment, they will be revised, The forecasting procedures presented for each data parameter are subject to change by the Richmond Regional PlannJng DistrJcl' Comm]'sslon as new or more f. easible me- Ihods are discovered. POPULAT IO N - developed by lhe County The control total forecast for the Study Area is to'be based on separaf-e analyses of each ' political jurisdiction involved. These forecasts will be based upon the results of various. mathema~icalandgrapl~ical techn~queswh]chutilize historical input data. A final con- trol total forecasts For the entire Study Area is to be made in the range of the forecasts made by the Division of State Planning and Community Affairs with consideration of the following: a, ,Comparing and evaluating the results of the different projection techniques in each jurisdiction b. Analyzing current trends~ c, Reviewing local plans and opinionsr and d. Analyz!ng the amount of vacant land avc~Jable for residential development, The'~istribution of the final control total to a traffic zone level is to be based upon an analysis of a. The amount of vacar~t land available for residential development~ !)", The existing percentage of land development in each zone~ c. Existing and proposed water and sewer systems~ d. Spatial arrangement of land uses; e. Existing and proposed group quarters~ and i:. Local plans and opinions regarding fulure development. HOUSING UNITS - developed by the County A separate forecast is to be made for each polil'ical iurisdictlon within the Study Area to detem~ine a control total forecast. This is to beaccompllsl~ed by a. Pro]ectlng historical trends in housing units using graphic and mathematic techn~ques~ ;and proiecth~g historical I'ronds in persons per housing unit rot'los using gropl~ic and rnotl~e- matical techniques. -10- The dist'rlbul'ion of the control total to a t'ral'flc zone level is !'o be based upon lhe fore- casted parse'ns per l]ouslng unit ratio for eacl~ zone wl~icJ~ are to be appl led to tl~e forecasted population by zone. The Forecasted iurisclictlonal I'olalsobtaJned in ll]eabov~are robe used I-o check the zonal totals within a particular j.urisdiction. AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP - developed by the Commk, ion A forecast is to be made separately for each jurisdiction based upon · .a. The projection of historical trends in automobile ownership, and b. Trends in persons per automobile ratios. Using the rate of change in jurisdictional persons per automobile~ Forecasted zonal ratios el~ persons per automobile can be developed. The distribution of the control forecast is to be accomplished by re'al'lng forecasted zonal persons per automobile ratios to the Forecasted zonal populations. The forecasted iurisdictional totals obtai,ned in the above are to be used to check the zonal totals within a particular jurisdiction. EMPLOYMENT - developed by the Commission A separate Forecast is I'o be made for each political iurisdiction within the Stbdy Area 1o arrive atacontrol total forecast. In arriving atacontrol total, each sector of employment is to be analyzed separately. The forecast will be based upon the J'esull's of various mathematical and graphical techniques which uti!izehistorical input data. The distribution oF the Study Area conh'ol total is to be accomplished by distribuI'ing each sector of employment separately. Zonal .distributions will be made based upon such items as a. Interviews with plant managers and government officials~ " !~. Forecasted increases in population~ and Amount ot: land zoned f'or commercial and manul:acturing developmenb etc. RETAIL SALES., developed by the Commission A separate Forecast Js to be made for each political .~ubdivis]on within the Study Area to deter- mJne a conh'ol total Forecast. The forecast will bo based upon lhe resulls of various malhe- rear,cai and graphical lechnlques which utilize historical input data. Allowances For proposed retail trade centers o1' great magnitude are I'o be made and incorporated' ]nlo the Forecasls when lhls is deemed ar. I)J'opr~ate Tho distribution of lho control total Forecast is Io bo made utilizing a salisfact'o~ malhe, matical tecl~niqu'o For lhat i)ortlon of tho I'olal sales csl[n~c~led fo bo made in Iha central business dJslrJct --II- and existing and proposed shopping centers. The dislributlon of sales to lhose other zones which are expected to l~ave retail sales is to be based upon the population and employment increases which have been forecast roi' those zones or some other acceptable method. The breakdown of the zonal Forecasts into shopper and bonvenience sales is to be made based upon a trend established For either shopper or convenience sales wil'hJn the Study Area. STUDENTS BY ZONE OF SCHOOL - developed by the County Forecasts are to be made based upon current and hlstorJcal trends in enrollment at the various schools, location of: £uture schools, expansion o£ existing schools and estimates of local school officials. However, until school planning [s resumed, projections will be based on, and will be equal to, the current capacity o~ existing schools as well as the knowledge of any schools programmed For construction. Traffic Data 'The Department ;s responsible for the work listed [n t'h[s categoFy unless otherw]se specified. 1o SURVEILLANCE a. Through the utilization of traffic Volumes~ the vehicle miles of travel on lhe fib°rough- fare network will be calculated. b. Calibrated trip generation! trip distributTon~ and trip assig~mbnt models will be utilized by the Department to develop traffic estimates. The calculated vehicle miles of travel and synthesized vehicle miles of travel will be compared as will be the actual volumes to the synthesized volumes for ind;vidual seg- ments. d. A review of the accident inventory will be made to identify l'hose locations which should be .considered [or modificalion or reconstruction. e. A reviews, of all available site plans for planned or newly developed major generators and Jnlenslve development will be made. When tl~e surveillance procedure described above indicates the need f'or plan fical'ion~ Jhe t'ollowJng steps will be employed as needed 1o quantify Ihe change and tp determine the alternate 1o be used: I. Small sample homo interview sludJes to delermJne travel characteristics 2. Travel lJmo and delay studies -12- 3. Recallbralion or t;r~p general'ion, trip dislribution, and Irip assignment models 4. Revised trip generation, trip dlslribution, and trip assignment to reft/act changes in socioeconomic data and forecasts 5. Functional planning For changes or revisions of the plan Through ground surveillance and the use'of ae¢ial photography, lite Functional draw- ings of proposed facilitles will be reviewed 1o determine il~ lite development o1: lhe pro- posed Facility is possible. I£ the revi'ew t:eveals Ihat a particular Functional plan is invalid, a preliminary location study will be made to develop an alternate to the orig[na! proposal. TRAVEL FORECASTING PROC EDURES a. TRIP GENEF'~,TION The multiple linear regression technique will be used to'determine the trip generat'ing characteristics of the area. Regress'ion equations have been developed in the bas'e study For trip productions and trip attracti,ons f.or each trip purpose necessary for trip distribution. The independent variables in these models included: 1. I'%mber of Dwel[ing Units · 2. Number of Residents (population) 3. Number of' Cars Owned 4. Number of Studehi's (by zone of residence) 5. Number of Students (by zone of school) ' 6. Dollar Value of Retail Trade a. Shopping Goods b. Convenience Goods 7. E-mployment 8. Land Use The independent variables to be used in the 1995 Richmond Update wiII include: Number of Housh~g Unils Popu la tlon Number of' Cars Owned Number of Sludents (by zone of school) Dollar Value of' Totat Retail Sales G~nployment - 13- Trip generatioi~ for trips crossing the exlernal cordon line of the study will inclu~le an analysis of lhe hlslorical trends for Ihe individual facilities~ an analysis of the general growlh in lhe corridor~ an analysis of diversion fi'om other ,'outes~ and Ihe inherent addltiona'l generation attributable to new or i'mproved focilitles. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Tl~e interactance model will be utilized to distribute the trips passing through the' area, The I'rlps ~or t'he base stud), were stratiJ:ied 1. White Collar Work 9. Miscel 2. Blue Collar Work 10. Transit 3. Personal Business 11. Transit School '4. Recreation 12. Transit' Shopping 5. School 13. Transit Other 6. Social 14. Light :trucks 7. Convenience Shopping 15. Heavy Trucks 8. G.A.F. Shopping 16. School Bus by the following purposes: Janoous Wo,'k The trips for the 1995 Richmond Update will be stratified by t]~e £oi lowing purposes: 1. Home Based Worl~ 2. Home Based Personal Buslness '3. Home Based Social-Recreation 4. Home Based School 5. Home Based Shopping 6. Non-home Based 7. Internal-External 8. Trucks The input parameters for the redlsh']but']on will include the i'r]p length characteristics as determined by the 1995 up-date, the Ihorought~are sysl'ern characl'er~stics as deter- mined ~y the annual inventory~ and lhe trip productions and attractions as developed Jhrough the utilizationo~updatedplannJngparamel, ers. The Frai'ar techn]quewill be'utilized ford]st-ributh~g thru trips. Thegrowth [actors for this model will be deter- mined fi'om an analys~s similar to the aforementioned lr~p generat'~on technique. The Gravity Model will be utilizecl for distributing all olher lrips. :' MODAL SPLIT This analysis will be i')erformed ail'or trip dJslribulion, Tile Iochniqu~ utilized will be developed anci maintained by tho Commission. It will ho ul'iJJzed only a{'ter bolng revlewed and t:ound acceptable by the Department~ Ihe Commlss]on and Ihe Trar~.- portal[on Policy Committee, d, TRIP ASSIGNMENT The minimum time path method of asslgnment will be used, Network data as deter- mined by the annual inventory and tri. p data as obtained from the aforementioned procedures will serve as input t'o Ihls process.' ee SYSTEMS EVALUATION Utilizing the output from the aforementioned assignment process~ an evaluation of recommended network will be made to detem~ine if the system is capable of accommo- dating the revised proiections and if significant redistribution of development has curred which mlght affect the base study staging. The evaluation will be made fromamultlrn0dal perspective. The Commission will maint'ain a transit network using the Urban Moss Transportation Adminisl'roi'ion's Transportation Planning System, This network will assist in the evaluatioi~ cf both trans~l' and h~ghway alternat'ives by the Department and the Commission before the Transportation Poi'icy Committee. The recommended plan including both highway and transit components will !hen be modified wilh the approval of the local agencies to satist~y any apparent deficiencies. ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW Concurrent with system evaluatibn~ an assessment of the social~ economic and environ- mental irnpactsatlhesystem level will be made. Tl~isanalyslswill beconducled utilizing Special Area Analysis and other n odels and procedures as may be available and will be in accordance with lhe Virginia Department of Highways and Transpor- tation's Action Plan, ,, , III, OTHER 1. SERVICE. All Iond usor socioeconomic~ and troJ'J'i¢ data (bolh curren~ and J'orecosl) will bo modo availnble ~ 15- to those agencies responsible for implementation ot: the plan as well as oti~er public and private sectors which the Commission and the County consider appropriate. Assistance will be provided to those agencies responsible for iml)lemenl']ng various proposals and for ti~e evaluation of all-er- nato development plans whlcl~ may be proposed. TIMING. The existing data is to be t~urn[shed no later than June 'J and each succeeding annual report of ex[stingdata is to be provlded bya June 1 deadline. Existing data fol' a Census year will be due five (5) months after the block data is available. The County will furnish the Commission with Land Use Mgps~ map segments~ or overlays of uniform scale end no smaller than 1" -- ~(000' by June 1. in the succeeding years~ therefore~ ~he changes in land use are to be pro- vided on maps~ map segments~ or overlays by lhe June 1 deadline. ', Every fifth year~ when planning data is reforecasted and disl'riJ2uted~ the forecasted data will be submitted three (3) months from the due date for the existing data. Forecasted data based upon Census 'Year data will be due three (3) months after the due date for the existing data for the part~culc~r 'v'ear. Land Use and socioeconomic 'data forecasts to the 'Year 2000 will i)e pro- v]ded to the Commission on or before October 1~ 1976. ARTICLE VI - REEVALUATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN The reevaluation will consist of analyzing characteristics and changes in exlstJng and future land uso~ industrial development~ retail sales~ populat[on~ employmer~t~ vehicle reg~stJ'at]on, traffic volumes and patterns~ recreationr and arterial plan implementation t'o determine the ~nfluence upon the Transportation Plan. When changes occur lhat do not parallel projecl'ions~ which boJh the Transportation Policy Commil'lee and the Department regard as s]gnit:Jcant; the Department will reassign lraffic volumes and adjust tho Io- cation and design of theT~ansportatlon Plan as may be indicated robe essential. Suchadjustmenls will be cooperalively developed with lhe local governments~ tho Transporlat~on Policy Committee a~d the De- parlment, The reevaluatJono~'lheTransportation Plan will be based, onsuci~ factors as traffic volume counts at strategic Iocatlons~ cordon and classlficatJon counls~ screenline counts~ transportation data reports fi'om the Commlsslon~ other reporls indicating unusual actlvily or development that'has occurred or that may be eminen.t~ and conferences with the local governments, In ocldJtJon~ small sample or[gJn-destJ- - 16- : nction trip data w]ll be obl'aJned at x, arJous inl'ervals as needed 1'o del'ermine basJc changes in travel pat- lernsandtrJpgenerat[oncharacterJstics. Re-appraJsalof'thoconHnuingtransportationplannJngprocess is to be carried out at three (3) levels. Level 1 will conslst of a roul']ne review which will be made annual'ly to determine ]F the ci~anges in urban development are in accordance with forecasted development. Should land use changes differ slgnil:icant'ly from the forecast, the revised land use is to be used to estimate trip ends in lhe area afl:ecl'ed in order to obtain a better measure of the impact of these changes on the transportation system. Should the impact be sJgnlf'icant~ the forecast of land use should be updated as a bas~s for developing new I'J'afl:ic estimates for project plonn]ng. Level 2 will consist of a major review conducted at least every five (5) year. s; and at that time, the far- get year will be extended Five (5) years in order that the planning process c~n produce twenty (20) year design data al' all times. An evaluation of' the ability of the enfire travel Forecasting process to sh'nulal'e 'actual travel will be performed. Level 3 will be composed el: all the elements h~cluded in Lev~,l 2 plus a reconsiderat'Jon of the jzlanning goals andobjectJves. Also included ~vill bathe examining and updatlngol:the technJcal procedures being used relative to the continually evolving transportal'ion and land use planning technology~ a re-sludy of the financial resources available to l:inancie the needed improvement and an exl'el~sion of the pricrily pro- gram of projects. The perpetuaI-~on of the adopted TransportaHon Plan by the Department will involve the sl'udy of alternal'e lines~ modificaHons~ and various changes~ some el: which will be significant while olhers w~ll be minor in 'nature. The Transportation Poiicy Committee will meet as needed torevlew~ comment~ recommend, and assist the Deparlment on any revisTons~ proposals, alternate lines~ and work performed on Ihe local'ion and desi~ln 6l: facilities [n the Trbnsporlation Plan for the Study Area. Any i)lanned worl< of this nature for lhe followlng month will boanagenda item for lhe Transport. aHon Policy Committee. The same procedure shall be l:ollowed when such location and design recommenclal'ions are contemplated by ei lher a pc,rtici- paling iur]sd]ction~ or the Commission. The Depart'ment~ Transportation Policy Commit lee or parliCil~al'ing jurisdiction shall be prepared to d~scuss the alternaiJves considered and discuss the ant'Jclpated soc~al~ economJc, and environmental effects of the alternatives~ point out lbo significant differences and the rea- supporting the proposed Iocat[on or design. The discussion shall also i~clude an analysis of the sons relal'Jve consisl'ency ot' lite alternatives with the goals and objectives of any urban plan lhat has been adopted by the community concerned. Such goals and objectives o£ any urban plan should be submitled to the Virginia Department of lqJghways and Transportation and the Transportation Policy Committee. :'my participating iurlsdiction~ the Department or the Commission may submit proposed changes in Ihe Transporl'ation Plan which are revislons~ additions~ deletions or meier relocation considerations to the · T. ransporl'c~tlon Policy CommiH'ee. These shall be submitted in I'he preliminary consideration stages. Re- commendations of the Transportation Policy Committee and the Commission will in turn be submitted to all participating jurisdictions for their cm~sideraI'ion and possible adoption. A minor revision, which in the opinion of the Transportation Policy Committee does not affect the overall Transportation Plan, nnay be submitted only to the affected participating iurisdictions and to ti~e Vi,'ginia Department of Highways and Transportation~ it: not init[ated by the Deparl'ment. Requests for analys&s by t'h~ Department of ma- jar plan revisions during a non-ut~dated period must be supported by the documentation of the need fo~; such analysis. Il: in the opinion of the Deparh'nent~ the available data is not satisl:actory l:or the eval- uatlon of a proposed revisions and/or the need for the proposed project is minor relative to olher high- way needs in tl~e area~ tI~e analysis of the revision will be deferred until sucl] l'ime as a meier reeval- uation is undertaken. No revisions al: the t'ype described in tt~isparagraph will becomea partoftl~e Transportation Plan unless approved by the .Transportation Policy Committee~ the Department ar, d jurisdiction inwl~ich the facility is located. Tl~eprocedure for adopting the plan will be similar to that established under tlqe Virginia Area .Development Act Section 15.1-1406. Before the cor~prehensive plan~ or any part thereof, shall be adopted, it sh'aJl be submitted to the Division of' State Planning and Community Af.¢airs and to the local planning commission (or~ if there be none, to lite governing body) of each governmental subdivision within the dis- trict for a period of not less than thirty days prior to a'hearing to be held by the pl. anning district commission lh'ereon, after notice as pro- vided in Section 15.1-4.31. Eaci~ such local planning commission shall make recommendations to the i)lam~ing dislrict comm~ssion with respect to the effect of the plan~ or pa. rt Ihereof~ within ils governmental subdivision on or before the date el~ said I~earJng. Upon approval of the con~prehensivo plan~ or part thereof~ by a planning dislrlct commission after sucl~ public hearing~ it stroll be suDmil'l'ed t'o tl~e governing body of each governmenlal subdivision (excJudlng ~'owns of less than three tl~ousand five hundred populallon) within tl~e disl'rict for adoplion and~ upon adoption thereof by she governing bodies o;~ a majority of such governmenlal subdivision, tile comprel~enslve plan~ or port thereof:~ shall become effective v,,il'l~ respect l'ct all action of a plannlng'Lfli:;'l'rict commission. The plai~ sba'Il not become effective wil'h respecl-1o tl~e action ot: li]e governing body of any goverhmental subdivision wJl'h]n the district unl'i[ adopted by I'he governlng body oi: such governmenl'al subdlvis[on. (1968, c.224.) ARTICLE VII - FINANCIIxIG , The services p~;rl:ormed by ~l~e Commission will be fine, need by Iocal~ SI'ate and Federal Fu~ds as rna>, be available to the Commission For this purpose. This funding will be supplemenI'ed by the Sect]on 112 fundh~g pro,.dded by the Federal Highway Admin[sh'at]on ar;d matched by the Del.~arl'nicnI'. 'The Sect]on 112 Funds will be used to finance the services performed by tile Count),. This I'[nancJng will be on a reimbursement basis pending the approval of subm~f'ted data, as outlined in this agreement, and commencing wii'h the 1973 data report..Payments shall be made on the basis of statements prepared by County. These stat'ements should be based o~ records maintained by the Co.unty in accordance with generally accepted cosl' accounting procedures. Tile 1973 dal'a reporl' and all.olher annual data reporls, 'including fifth year reports, will be financed up to the maximum Figures established by the annual Unirled Work Program bu~e..ti,~g process. Due to the unique relationship between the County of Chesterfield and the Commission, the County agrees to make an annual payment to the Commission to cover its share of costs incurred by the Commission in providing transportation planning services. This payment shall be computed on the basis of the County's percentage of :he urbanized area's population, based on the most recent Tayloe-Murphy figures. This percentage will be ,·~pplled to the full cost (including overhead and payroll burden) o£ local match Funds applied to federal grants, ?lus any straight local Funds necessary, For the Commission to provide the transportation planning services as ~)ecified in the annual Unified Work Program. This payment shall be made on July I For the Fiscal year ~..~,ginning on that day. -19- Should it bo iotnlly determined by lhe Transporlal'i~n ?alley Cbmmitl'ae and the Dai:~orlmenl' thaf a com- l~iC:te r~;sl'udy of all facets o1: tho Transl)orlol'~on Plan would J)e nacassaryr opproachi,~g in scope Ihe inil~aJ 'itucly, lhe fina~cTng oF such st'udles will bo approved by lbo local governments pr]or to inJt'[atln.q ~.,tudios. ARTICL~ VIII - AMENDMENTS Amendments 'l:o I'l~is Agre.emeM m6'y be mode by wr]llen agreement between II~e County'and the Com- mission afl'er review qnd recommendal'lons b}, the Tr~nsporlalion Policy Commit'l'ee, AP, TICLE IX -CIVIl_ RIGHTS ACT The. County,. its c~ge'nl'sr empJoyees~ assigns~ or succOssoI:sr and any pel:son or c~gency of Whal'evor.nol'ure, wllh whom il' may bo conl'rc~cl' or ~nc~ke an agreement, shall co]3ply x,,,]lh Ihe prgvisions of TITI_t~ VI of lbo Civil Ricjhts Acl' of 1964- os sol-out' in the Appc;ndix, oH'c~ched herol-o and made a I)ort' of l'his corffrc~cl by [et:eronce .' ,.. IN WHIT[q ESS \,'?H EREOF~ Ihe County and the Commission have executed this Agreen'~en~' on tt~e day and ),cai' first wril'l'en al)ave. .' WITNESS COUNTY : WITNESS RICI'IMOND REGIONAL PLAN.IxJ. ING DISTRICT 'Exocul ivo L~cclor , .-- AN AGREEMENT FOR A CONTINUING, cOMPREHENSIVE, AND COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS FOR THE RICHMOND REGION THIS AGREEMENT made this day of in the year nineteen I',undred and seventy-five (1975) by and between the Richmond Regional Planning District Commission hereinafter called the Commission and the County of Chesterfield hereinafter called the County. The County has, by resolution of its governing body on 19 · delegated the responsibility for the Conti~uing, Comprehensive, and Coordinated Transportation Planning Process to the Commission. NOW THEREFORE~ the Commission and the County agree as follows: ARTICLE I - LOCATION OF STUDY The study shall include tl,e area contained in the political jurisdictions of the City of Richmond, and portions of Henrlco and Chesterfield Counties. Also included is part of the Dover District in Gooch- land County and parts of Hanover County and shall hereinafter be called the Study Area. The boundaries of the Study Area may be adiusted by agreement between the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation (hereinafter called the Department) and the Commission provided that the area included in the boundaries shall not be less than the Urbanized area defined by the U.S. Bureau of Census. ARTICLE II - LENGTH OF STUDY The Richmond Regional Area Transportation Study as supported by resolutions of the Participating Jurisdictions will be eslal~llshed on a continuing basis by the Participating Jurisdiclions, the Com- mission, and the Department. The Agreement between tire Commission and the County will terminate only when: 1) Section 134, Title 23, U.S. Code, previously cited herein, is repealed or amended by Congress 2) of the United Stol'es !'o no Ior~ger require the conl'inuingt comprehensive~ and coordinated Iransl)'or- fallen planning processt or The Commission withdraws t'rom the conl'inulngt comprehensivet and coordinated h'ansporlatlon plan- nlng process agreement with the Department~ or 3) The County withdraws from the contlnuing~ comprehenslve~ and coordinated transportation pla~]ni'ng process with no less than ninety (90) days written notice to the Commlssion~ or 4) The Commission withdraws its representation of' the County in lhe continuing, comprehensive, and co- ordinated transportation planning process with no less than ninety (90) days written notice to the County. 'ARTICLE I11" TPva, NSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE The Transportation Pol[cy Committee w]ll be established by the Commiss]o~ to guide the continuJng, com- prehensive~ and cooperative transportation planning process. The Transportation Policy Committee will be composed oF one policy representative and two lechnical representatives fi'om each partic~patlng juris- dic'tion w~l'hin ti~e Study Area who will be.appointed by the local governing body to represent their local government as voting members. There sba'il also be one voting member designated by and representing eachofthe £ollowingagencies: (1) theVirg]nia Department of Highways and Transportation, (2) Richmond MetropolitanAuthor]ty~ and (3) the Greater Richmond Transit Company. There shall beene non-voting member designated by and representing each o£ l'he following agencies~ if' lhe agencies so de- sire (1) the State Division of Planning and Community AfFairs, (2) the Federal Highway Administration, (3) the Department ot: t'bus[ng and U,'ban Development, (4) the Federal Aviatlon Administration, and such 6itJzen parl.]cJt)ation as recommended by tile appropriate localities. Tile County agrees to formally desigi~ate o~qe policy rel~lesenta~ive' and two teclmicaJ ret)~es(.~ntc~t[ves to be oct]vemembersot'the Transportation PollcyCommillee. l'lle County also agrees tool)l)oi~l approl)r'i'ale citizen rel)resentatJves t~ II~e CommJltee. ARTICLE IV-FUNCTIONS OF THE TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE Tho Transporiatbn Pol[cy Commiltee will 1) establish Policy for tho continuing~ comprehenslvo~ and co.operative lransportation planning process; 2) review lhe Long Range Transportal'ion Plan on an annual. Basis; 3) determine when a reevaluation of Ihe Transportation Plan is necessary; 4) review lhe results of. Ihe reevaluation; 5) recommend appropriate action by llte Commission and the Department; 6) review re- quests for study area boundary changes; 7) review systems proposals required by the Federal and State' agencies; 8) rev[ow and approve tl~e annual unified work program; 9) delerm[no lhe influence o1: current data upon Ihe Transportation Plan in relation Io previous data and prelected trends; 10) cooperate in the development o1: the procedures for the collection of traffic data a~d reasslgnment of traffic; 11) work with }he Staffs of the Comm[ss~'on and the Department; 12) meet at leastmontl~/y when the agenda warrants, as 'determined by the Chairman~ to revJew~ comment~ recommend~ and assist the Department~ participating pol~tlcal jurlsdlcfions~ or the Commission on any proposal~ alternate li,~es~ and work perforated on the location and design of fac[lities in the Transportation Plan. The Transportation Policy Committee will be chaked by a member of the Commlss[on appointed bY the Chairman o~ the Commission. A Vice-Chairman will be selected by members of the Committee. Appoint- ments to the Transportation Policy Committee shall be filled by persons trained and knowledgeable in transportation plam~ing or who~ by their position have an interest and responsibility in the local transpor- tatlon planning process. AI~TICLE V - FUNCTIONS OF THE COMMISSION AND THE CITY The Commission assumes the r.esponsibility of scheduling and holding meetings ot: lhe Transporl'at;ion Policy Commit'tee and Sub-Cornmitl'ees; preparing minutes of all official meetings of the Transportation Policy Committee and distributing the mJnufes to parl'icii)ating agencies; processing in a timely manner all plans~ plan revisbns, projects, data projections~ agreements~ highway systems~ or other documents through Ihe local governing bodies for approval; participallng in special studies undertaken by ihe Department upon Ihe request of the Department to the extent budget and personnel limitations will allow as delermined by the ~ecutive Director o[ the Commission; preparing tl~e annual Unified Work Program as required by lhe Federal Iflighway AdministralJo~; assJsling with lbo preparation of Ibc lransporlcilion planning process am]ual report; reporlJng significant cha~ges in socioeconomic and la~,d use data; and, assisti~g wilh the compilation of lransit inventory and parking invonloJ'y dala. Furl'her~ it is b]peratJve Ihat Ihe socioeconomic and land use forecasls f:or lbo County be approved by Transl)orlalion Policy Commiltee and Ihe County prior to suL~m]ssJon to the Virginia Del)arlment of Highwoys and Transportal'ion. The Commission and thc Cou.nty h~reby jointly assume lhe responsibilily for providing the socioeconomic and land use data ne~zessary [or the continuing transporlotlon planning process. This data and all olher information will be de.ycleped according to the following methodology. DATA COLLECTION A. Planning Dal'a - Annual Changes in urban development are to be recorded annually based upon increases or decreases in land use~ population~ and economic data. The magnitude and location ot: these changes are to be recorded on a traffic zone basis for the entire Study Area. The surveillance of urban development for lhe Study Area will be conducted by the Richmond Regional Planning Dislrict Commission through the collection of relevant data. All quantitative data collected by lhe Richmond Regional Planning District Commission will be revlewe~J for co~pleteness and c~ccuracy by: the Department; and if found to be mutually unacceptoble to the Commission and the Depart- The rnent~ ii-will be revised. Maximum use will be made of 1970 and future census data. ttollowlng is a list of the specific items to be recorded annually for each traffic zone: be POPULATION -developed by the County a. Total b. Group Quarters (dormitory-school, military barracks, etc.) EMPLOYMENT - developed by the Commission RETAIL SALES -developed by Ihe Commission Tile Commission will update the retail sales business listing o~tained from the Deparlment of Taxation aswetlas the consolidated business list on an' annual basis. However~ lhe actual retail sales dollar values will not be reported annually. LAND USE (acres)-.developed by the County a. Single t:amily (includes lrailers) Mul~ipl~ I'amily (includes duplexes) Groul) ©uarters Commercial (retail~ services, finance, insurance, real eslate) Industrial (light and heavy; truck terminals, wholesale~ contract co~struclJon services) Public and Semi-Public (hosl)ilals~ sanitoriums~ librarles~ £ederal~ State~ Iocc~l ad- mJnJslration~ schools~ recreal'Jonal~ etc.) Miscellaneous (transportal'ion lermJnals ~ rights-of-ways~ ulJJilies~ communical ions~ and parldng lois and garages~ el'c.) It. Vacant (agrlcull'ure'~ foresh'y, other vacant land) i.' Waler Areas Maps and/or overlays showing the existing land use and changes will be provided at a scale ~1~1"=~00'. Thls dala will also be summarized in acres by traffic zone. 5. LAND DEVELOPMENT POLICY - this information will be collected by tl~e County. Changes in land development policy are to'be recc;rded on a continuing basis. These changes are to be identified by recording such significant items as new zoning ordinances or signil:i- cant changes in existing ordinance~ flood control projects~ urban renewal projects~ water and sewer programs, etc, ' CITIZEN PARTICIPATION - mechanisms For citizen involvemenl- will b~ maintained by the ' Commission, Citizen input will be sought at all stages of l'he planning process. Methods t'o be used to inform the public and obtain public views may include use of the annual report, newspapers~ radio and televislon~ and the holding of~ public meetlngs~ and organization ot: citizen committees. ADDRESS CODING GUIDE and the Commission. - this information will be maintained jointly by the County This document will be kept current in order to f'acilltate accurate retrieval of all data. Be- ginning with Fiscal year 1976 the County will report the changes in street addresses. The changes will be reported relative to the most recent version of the Address Coding Guide. The Com- mission will supply the fon~s [or providing this inl:ormation. The Commission will review and process this data and provide copies of the document to all inl'erested agencies. PLANNING DATA - F1FTI-I YEAR The following is a list of lhe speci£ic items to be recorded overt, I'ifll~ year~ beginning wilh 1975~ for each Iraffic zone~ and lhe methods to be employed in oblaining quanlilative dala for each. 1. HOUSING UNITS - developed by lhe County a. Single family (includes trailers) b. Mull~ple I'amJly (includes duplexes) ' Total The change Jn l~ousing units is to be measured by keeping a record of building permits, occupancy permits (if available) and demolil']on permits. These records are to beslrati- fled by single family and multiple I~amilyunlts. The previously developed zonal housing unit' counts will then be adjUsted .based upon these changes. POPULATION - Developed by the County Tel'al Group Quarters (dormitory-schools, military barracl<s~ etc.) Total population will normally be estimated based upon the change in housing unil's and the application ot: appropriate occupancy ratios, and the addhion oF Group Quarters population. The population in group quarters is to be ident~[ied separately by IraFFic zones, AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP- developed by the Commission 'To be determined £rom automobile registration do]a supplJed to local Commissioners of Revenue by the State Division of Motor Vehicles. An up-to-date address coding guide is to be prepared and used in relating addresses to the appropriate traffic zone. The applicotion of' historical zonal trends ~or automobiles per housing unit~ or automob[les per persm? can be utilized; however~ the totals must be cor~pared to jurisdictional automobile reg]'sh'atlons. Census data may be used~ but it musi be supplemenled with automobile data for group quarlers. EMPLOX/M ENT - developed by the Commission To be deteJ'm[ned by industrial classification for each h'affic zone utilizing official Store and local r~cords including the Virginia Employment Commission's Records. An up-to-dale oddress coding gu]de is to be prepared and used in relating addresses Io appropriate traffic zones. Poslal mail route maps will be ul'illzed~ where avoilable, Io alcl in relaling addresses lc) ~,'affic zones, RETAIL SALES - developed by Ihe Commission a. Shol)per b. Convenience c, Tolal e To be determh~ed from records of lhe A.BoC. Board and the State Department of Taxationo An ul~-to-date address coding gulde ]s to be prepared and used in relating addresses 1o the opproprlote traffic zones. STUDENTS a, b. Co BY ZONE OF SCHOOL -- developed by th,~ County Grades 1-12 College Total " School attendance data ]s to be obtained from local school board~ college and I',eci]nJcal school records, LAND USE (acres) - developed by County , · TO be stratified as sho'wn prevlously in the items to be collected annually TRAFFIC DATA Traffic data w]ll be collected annually by the Department unless otherw;se specified and will consist of the following: 1. TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDIES An annual count program has been established to determine average daily traffic volumes and to identify l'h(~, peaking characteristics of traffic for eact~ existing I]nk or segments of the network.' This could include classification and car occupancy counts. 2. THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM INVENTORY The inventory of the existing thoroughfare system will be.updated am~ually to determine what ci]anges have been made. following for eacl~ segment: a. Segment clescJ'ii')t i on b. Jurisdictlon C. AdrnJnist ralJve Classification d. Functlonal Classification e. Typical Section Parking Cor~ditJons g. Operating Speeds and Delays This inventory sl~all include~ but is not limited to, the TR~NSiT _!NVENTORY" An annual review of the t,'ansil' system will be conducled Io determine changes or 6dditions to the ex]stlng transit system and an inventory of ridership as available from lhe records of the transit agencies. The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission will provide this annual review with the assistance of the Greater Richmond Trm"~sit Company and the suburban tra~,sit carrl ars. II. e MAJOR GENERATOR SURVEILLANCE The staffs of the regional agencies and pariicipating iurisdicHons have been requested to pro- vide lists of site plans and associated data and,/or the actual site plans and associated data regard- ingplann~d major generators which afFect the major thoroughfare plan. This serves as input to the Departments data retrieval system. Studies to determine the effect of extensive traffic engineering improvements upon the Trans- portatlon Plan. .Small sample origin-destination studies as necessary to calibrate mathematical models and check trip generation and altraction parameters. Environmental Overview of socioeconomic and environmental efFecls at the system and proiect' levels will be conducted in accordance with the Department's Action Plan. An an"nual report will be made available containing a quantitative summary of surveillance items. Also included in the annual report will be comments on plan implemenlation with respect to a particuJarstaglng period. Construction protects~ either undertaken or completed, which are not consistent wiih the plan are to be included. The pattern of land develo?ment anct ils con- slslency wiih the land use plan is 1o be included in the annual report. FORECASTS A. Planning Data The planning data~ which will serve as Jnpuls to the t'ra[J]c model will be reforecast ever)/ five (5)),ears. Forecasts are fo bomade twenly-five (25) years into the future in order tomaintaln twenty (20) year design data at all times. Thc' proposed methods of [oracoslJng lbo i)lanning data will be presenled fo tho Transportal'ion Policy CommJlloe and lho Dai)arlmenf [or review and recommendation; if faunal to be mutually unacceptable t'o the Commillee and lhe Deparlment~ they will be revised. The forecasHng procedures presented for eacl~ dala parameter are subject lo change by the Richmond RegJonal Planning District Comm]sslon as new or more f. easible lhods are discovered. POPULAT IO N - developed by tl~e County The control total [orecast for the Study Area is to'be based on separate analyses of each political jurisdiction involved. Tl]ese forecasts will be based upon the results of varbus mathematical and grapl~ical techniques wl~Jch utillze histo,'ical input data. A [inc~l con- frei total forecasts for the entire Study Area is to be made in lhe range et~ the forecast's made by the Division of State Plannlng and Community Affairs witl~ consideration fei Iowlng: a. .Comparing and evaluating the results of the different proiectlon tecl~nlques in each jurisdiction Analyzing current trends~ c. Revlewing local plans and oplnions, and d. Analyzlng the amount of vacant land available for residential development. The'Sistrlbution el: the final control total to a traffic zone level is to be based upon an analysis of ~" a. The amount of"vacal~t land available for residential development~ b. .The existing percent'age of land development in each zone~ c. Existing and proposed water and sewer systems~ d. Spatial arrangement oF land uses~ e. Existing and proposed group quart'ers~ and f. LOcal plans and Opinions regarding fulure development. HOUSING UN ITS -developed by lheCounty A separate t'orecast is to be made for each polilical jurisdlcllon wilhin the Slucly Area !o delem~ine a control total forecosl, This is Io be accompllsl~ed by a. Projecllng hislorlcal I'rends in housing unils using graphic and mathematic lechniques, 'and L~. projecting hislorJcal trends in persons per housing unlt ratios using gral~1~ic and n~atlcal technlques. Th'e distr[butlon of tl~e control total to a traffic zone level ~s to bo based upon Ihe [ore- casted persons per I~ouslng unit ratlo for eacl~ zone wl~]c~ are to be applied to tl~e forecasted populat]on by zone. The forecasted jur]sdicHonal I'o~alsobtalned in lhe abov(~ are to be used !o check the zonal totals w]tt~[n a particular j.urisd]cHon. AUTOMOBILE OWNERSHIP - developed by the Commission A forecast is to be made separately for each jur~sdicl']on based upon aa The projecHon o[ historical h-ends in automobile ownersh[p~ and bo Trends ]n persons per automob[le rat]os. Using the rate of change in jurisdictional persons pet' automob]le~ Forecasted zonal ratios of persons per automobile can be developed, The distribution of the control I:orecast is to be accomplished by re~ating forecasted zonal persons per automobile ratios 4'o the forecasted zonal populaHons. The forecasted jurisdictional totals obta[.,ned in the above are to be used to chect< the zonal totals within a particular jurisdiction° EMPLOYMENT - developed by l'l~e Commission A separate Forecast is to be made for each political jurisdiction within Ihe Study Area to arrive at a control total forecast. In arriving at a control to~'al, each sector oF employment is to be analyzed separately. The £orecast will be based upon the results of various mathematical and graphical techniqueswh~ch uti!izehistorical input data. The distribution of the Study Area control total is to be aq.compli~hed by distributing each sector o¢ employment separately. Zonal distributions will be made based upon such items as a. b. Interviews with plant maL~agers and government of Ficials~ Forecasted increases in population~ end Amount o[ land zoned for commercial and manufacturing development~ etc. RETAIl_ SALES - developed by the Commission A separal'e Forecast is t'o be made roi' each polilical subdivision within the Sludy Arc:u 1o deter- mine a conlrol Iai'al forecast. The forecast will be basect upon Ihe resull:, of various mc~lhe- matlcal and graphical lechniqueswhich utilize historical input dale. Allowances for proposed relall trade centers of great magnllude are 1o be made and incorporated inlo the forecosls when Ibis is deemed atDproprlal'e. ~ Tho dislribullon of the control l'olal Forecast is to bo made utlllzlng a sali.,',t'actol¥ mctth(~matlcal technique for that portion oF the I'otal sales estlmal'od to be made in Iho central business dlslrict and exist[ng and proposed shopping centers. 1'he dlslrlbuti0n of sales to those other zones which are expected to l~ave retail sales is to be based upon the population and employment increases which have been forecast fei' those zones or some other acceptable method. '[he breakdown of the zonal forecasts into shopper and ~onvenience sales is to be made based upon a trend, established for either shopper or convenience sales wil'l~in the Study Area. STUDENTS BY' ZONE OF SCHOOL - developed by the County Forecasts are to be made based upon current and historical trends in enrollment at the various schools, location of future schools, expansion of existing schools and estimates of local school officials. However, until school planning is resumed, projections will be based on, and will be equal to, the current capacity of existing schools as well as the knowledge of any schools programmed for construction. Trafl:ic Data The Department is responsible fei' the work listed in this category unless otherwise specified. 1. SURVEILLANCE Through the utilization of traffic Volumes~ the vehicle miles of travel on Ihe l'horough- fare network wilt be calculated. bo Calibrated trip generation~ trip distribution~ and trip assignmbnt models will be utilized by the Department to.develop traffic estimates. The calculated vehicle miles of travel and synlhesized vehicle miles of travel will be comported as will be I'he actual volumes to the synthesized volumes for individual seg- ments. d. A review of ~he accident invento~ will be made to iden~[fy those locations which should be considered for modificalion or reconstruction. e. A rex, ic~ of all available site plans for i~[cmned or newly de',,eloped mujor ~en~rc~ors and inlensive developmenl will be made. When II~e surveilla~ce proceclure described above indicales I'he need for plan modl- ficotion~ lbo following steps will be employed as needed Io quantify Ibc change and to determine lhe all'ernale Io be used: 1. Small sample home interview sludies to determine lravel characleristics .2' Travel limo and delay studies . -12- Recallbralion of trip general'ion~ trip distribullont and trip assignment models Revised trip general'ion~ trip dislrlbution, and trip ossignment to reflbct changes in socioeconomic date end forecasts 5. Functionol planning for changes or revisions of the plan Through ground surveillance and the use of aerial photography, the functional draw- ings of proposed facililies will be reviewed lo determine if tile development of tl~e pro- posed facility is possible. If the review eeveals that o particular functional plan is invalid, o preliminary location study will be mode to develop on alternate to original proposal. TRAVEL FORECASTING PROC EDURES a. TRIP GENEPU~,TION The multiple linear regression technique will be used to'determine Ihe trip generating characteristics of the area. Regress]on equations have been developed in the base stud), for trip distribution. 1. Number productions and trip ctth'actions fei' each trip purpose necessary for trip The independent variables in these models included: of Dwelling Unit's .2. 4. 5. 6. Number Number Number of Residents (population) of' Cars Owned of Studehts (by zone of residence) Number of Students (by zone of school) Dollar Value of Retail Trade a. Shopping Goods b. Convenience Goods 7. l~ployment 8. Land Use The independent variables to be used in Ihe 1995 Richmond Updale will include: 1. Number of Housh~g Unils 2.~ Population .. 3. Number of Cars Owned 4. Number OF Students (by zone of school) 5. Dollar Voluo of Tolal Retail Sales 6. F. mployment Trip generation for trips crossing the external cordon I]ne of the study will includle an analysis of Ihe h]slor]cal trends for the ]ndlv[dual facilities~ an analys~s of tile general growlh in the corridor~ an analysis of d]verslon from other routes~ and inherent additional generation attributable to new or i'mproved facilities. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The interactance model will be utilized to distribute the trips passing tl~rough the' area ,' The l'r~ps {:or the base stud), were stratified by the following purposes: 1. White Collar Work 9. Miscellaneous 2. Blue Collar Work 10. Transit Work 3. Personal Business 11. Transit School '4. Recreation 12. Transit Shopping 5. School 13. Transit Olher 6. Social 14. Light Trucks 7. Convenience Shopl)ing 15. Heavy Trucks 8. G.A.F. Shopping 16. School Bus The 1. Home Based Worl~ 5. Home Based Shopping 2. Home Based Personal Business 6. Non-home Based '3. Home Based Social-Recreation 7. Inlernal-External 4~ 14ome Based School 8. Trucks trips for the 1995 Richmond Update will be stratified by t!~e following purposes: Tile input'parameters for the redistribution will include the trip lenglh characteristics as determined by the 1995 up-dal'e~ the Ihoroughfare syslern chorocl'erlstics as deter-- mined by ~he annual invenlor),~ and the trip producl'Jons and atlracllons as develoi~ed through I'he ulilization OfUl~da~edl~la,ming I~aromelers. The lZ,'otar l'echnlque will be ufilized fordlstribu~ing thru tr~l'>S, fha growlh Factors for ll~ismodel will I,c, dul~,r- mi~ed from on analysis similar 1o Iha aforementioned trlp generolion lechniqu~. The Gravity Model will be utilized for dislributing all olher trips. el, MODAL SPLIT Thlsonolysiswill be performed after trip distribution. The lechnlque utilized will be developed and mointoined by Iho Commission. It will be ulilizod only off'er being reviewed and found acceptable by Ihe Deparlment~ the Commission and Ihe Trans- portal'ion Policy Committee. TRIP ASSIGNMENT The mlnh'num time path method ot' assignment will be used. Network dale as deter- mined by llte annual inventory and tri.p data as obtained from the aforementloned procedures will serve as input to Ihis process.' SYSTEMS EVALUATION Utilizing the output from the aforementioned assignment process~ an evaluation of lite recommended network will be made to determine if the syste~ is capable of accommo- dating the revised projections and if significant redistribution o..f development has oc- curred whicl] might affect the base study staging. The evaluation will be made from a mult]m°dal perspective. The Commission will maintain a transit netwgrk using the Urban Mass Transportation Administration's Transportation] Planning System. Tt~is network will assist in fha evaluation of both transit and i~ighway alternatives by the Department and the Commission before the Transportation Policy Committee. The recommended plan including both highway and transit components will then be ' modified wilh the approval of the local agencies I'o satisfy an), apparent deficiencies. ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW Concurrent with system evaluation~ an assessment ot: lhe soc]al~ economic and env]ron- mental impacts at lh'esystem levelwill be made. Thisanolysi_~, will I)econducled utilizing Special Area Analysis ancl o~her mocJels ~nd i~rocedures ~s may be ~,vc~ilc~bte and will be in accorda~ce with the Virginia Del)arlment' of I~ighways c~nct talion's Action Plan. III. OTH EP, 1, SERVICE All land use~ socJoeconomic~ and Iraffic dale (bolh current and J'orec(~s~) wiJJ be ma(Jo c~,va~l(~bie me. to I-hose agencies responslble for implementation of the plan as well as olher public' and prival'e .sectors which the Commisslon and the County consider appropriate. Assistance will be provided to those agencies responsible for implementing various proposals and for the evaluation of ali'er- hate development plans whlch may be proposed. TIMING The existing data is to be furnished no later than June 1 and each succeeding annual report of existing data i~ to be provided by a June 1 deadline. Existing data for a Census year will be due five (5) months after lhe block data is available. The County will furnish the Commission with Land Use MOps, map segments~ or overlays of uniform scale and no smaller than 1" = -.~3~' by June 1. In the succeeding years, therefore, the changes in land use are to be pro- vlded on maps, mop segments, or overlays by tl~e June 1 deadline. . o Every fifth year, when planning data is reforecasted and distributed, ti~e forecasted data will be submitted three (3) months fi'om the due date for the existing data. Forecasted dal'a based upon Census Year data will be due three (3) months after the due date for th~ existing data for the particular Year. Land Use and socioeconomic data forecasts to Ihe Year 2000 will be pro- vided to the Commission on or before October 1~ 1976. ARTICLE VI - REEVALUATION OF THE. TRANSPORTATION PLAN The reevaluation will consist of analyzing characteristics and changes in existing and future land use, industrial development~ retail sales, 'population, employmentr vehicle registration, traffic volumes and patterns, recreatlon~ and arterial plan implementation Io determine the influence upon the Transportation Plan. When changes occur that do not parallel proiections~ which bolh the Transportation Policy Commil'lee and ll~e Del)artment regard as slgnlricant~ the Department will reassign lroffic volumes and adjust ll,e Ia- cation and des~gn of the Transpor~'ollon Plan as may be indlcaled lobe essential. Suchadjustme.~r. will be cooperolively developed wilh lhe local governments~ the Tronsporlc~lion Policy Committee c~cI parlment. The reevoluatio~ of the Tronsl~orlation Plan will I~e bosed, ot~ such [c~clor~ (~:. lraffic counts at slrategic Iocatlons~ cordon and clossifical'ion carrots, screenline counts~ Iransporlollon dolo reporls from the Commission, other reports inclicoling'unusual actlvily or develol)ment Ihat has occurred or that~ybeemlnent~ and conferences wilh the local governments. In addition, small sample origin-desli- -- 16- . r~ctlon trip data will be obt'a[ned at varJous intervals as needed to det-ermlne basic changes in travel pal- te~ns and trip generation characteristics. Re-appraisal of the continuing transportation planning process Js to be carried out at three (3) levels. Level 1 w~ll consist of a routine review which will be mode annually to determine ~f the changes in urban development are in accordance with forecasted development. Should land use changes differ significantly from the forecast~ the revised land use is to be used to estimate trip ends in the area affected in order to obtain a better measure of the h~pact of l'hese changgs on the transportation system. Should lhe impact be s]gnificant~ the forecast of land use should be updated as a basis for developing new traffic estimates for project planning. Level 2 will cons]st of a major review conduoted at least every five (5) year, s; and at that th'ne, the tar- get year will be extended five (5) years in order that the planning process can produce twenty (20) year. design data at all times. An evaluation of ti~e ability oi: the entire travel forecasting process to simulate 'actual travel will be performed. Level 3 will be composed of all the elements included in Level 2 plus a reconsideration of the planning goals and objectives. Also included ,r, dll be the examining and updating of the technical procedures being used relative to the continually evolving transportation and land use planning technology~ a re-sludy of the financial resources available to finance ti~e needed improvement and an extm~sion of the priority pro- gram of projects. The perpetuation of the adopted Transportation Plan by the Department will involve lhe study of alternate lines~ modifications~ and various changes~ some of which will be significant while othe~ will be minor 'nature. The Transportation Policy Committeew]ll meetas needed toreview, comment, recommend, and assist the Deparl'ment on any revis]ons~ proposals, alternate lines~ and wort< performed on the IoccJlion and design 0f facililies in the Transporlal'~on Plan for the Study Area. Any planned worl< of Ibis nc,~ure following monlh will be an c~gencla item for the Transl~O,'latio~ Policy Commillt~e. The s(.~m(~ I~rocedurt~ shall be followed when such location and design recommenclations a~'e conleml~lc~led.by pali~giurlsdiction~ or the Commission. The Deparlment~ Transpo,'lolion PolicyCommitleeorparlic]l~aling jurlsdiction shall be prepared to discuss lhe alternalives considered and dis:uss lhe anlici?c~tccl social, economics'and environmenlal effects of Ihe alternatives~ point out the significant differences and lhe rea- · - 17- sons sui)portlng the proposed location or design. The discussion shall also include arl analysis of the ~'eJat'ive consistency of li~e alternal'ive, s with tire goals and obiecl'ives of any urban plan Ihat has been adopled by the communlty concerned. Such goals and objectives of any urban plan should be submil~ed to the Virgln~a Department of Highways and Transportatio,~ and l'he Transportation Policy Committee. .Any participating jur]sd[ction, the Deparl'ment or the CommJssion may submit proposed changes in Transportation Plan which are revislons~ addltlons~ deletions or major relocation considerations to the -Transport(~fion Policy Committee. These shall be subm]lted in the preliminary consideration stages. Re- commendations of the Transportation Pollcy Committee and the Commission will in turn be submitted to all partlcipating iurlsdictions fo,' their consideration and possible adoption. A m~nor revision, which the opinion of the Transportation Policy Committee does not affect the overall Transportation Plan, may be submitted only to the affected participating jurisdictions and to the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportafion~ if not initiat.ed by the Department. Requests for analys~s by the Department of nra- i'or plan revisions during a non-ulJdated period must be supported by the documentation of the need fo,; sucl~ analysis. If in tire opinion of the Departrnent~ the available data is not satisfactory for the eval- uation of a proposed rev~sions and/or the need for the proposed project is minor relative to other high- way needs in the area, tl~e analysis of the revision will be deferred until sucl~ time as a major reeva[- uation is undertaken. No revisions of the type described in tirisparagraph will becomea part ofl'l~e Transportation Plan unless approved by tire .Transportation Policy Committee, the Department and the jurisdiction in which tire facility is located. Tl~e procedure for adopting tile plan will be similar to l'hat established under tf~e VJrglnia. Area Development Act Section 15.1-t406. Before the cor~prehensive plan, or any part t'hereof~ shall be adopted, it sh'all be submitted to the Division of State Planning and Community Al.fairs and to the local planning commission (or, if there be none, to the governing body) of eacir governmental subdivision within the dis- trlct for a period of riot less tlran ]hirty days prJor to a'hearing to be held by the planning district commission lhereon, after notice as pro- vided in Section 15.1-431. Each such local planning commission sl~all make recommendations Io the planning dlslrict commission with respect Io the effect of lhe plan, or part Ihereol:~ wilirin ils governmental subdivision on or before lbo date of sald hearing. Upon approval of l. comprehensive i)lan~ or part there,_.~ by a :..-planning dislrlct commlssbn after sucl~ publlc hearlng~ it sl~all be submi'Jil'ed I'o t1~e governlng body of eacl~ governmenlal subdlvlsion (excJuding towns ct~ less than lhree tl~ousand five hundred populalion) .within II~e district for adoption and~ upon adopllon thereof by Ihe governlng bodies of a majority of such governmental subdlvlsion, the comprel~enslve plan~ or part thereot~, shall become el:fective will~ respect t'ct all action of a planning 'di~'lrlct commission. The pla'n sba'Il not become effective wlth respect to the action of Ihe governing body of any goverhmental subdlvlslon wil'hln the district until adopted by 'the governlng body ct:such governmental subdivislon. (1968, c.224.) ARTICLE Vil - FINANCING The services performed by tl~e Commisslon will be I:inanced by local, State and Federal Funds as may be available to lhe Commission for this purpose. Tl~is funding will be supplemented by Ibc Secl'ion 112 funding provlded by the Federal Highway Adrnin~stratlon arid matched l~y the Dapartn~cnt. · TheSectlon 112 funds will beusedto finance the services performed by tbe County. Tbis financlngwill be on a re]mbursement basis pending the approval oi: submil'ted data, as outlined in tl~is agreement~ and commencing with the 1973 dora report..Payments shall be made on tl~e basis oi' stat'ements prepared by County. These stat'ements should be based on records malntalned by lhe Co.unty in accordance with generally accepl'ed cost accounl'Jng procedures. Tl~e 1973 data report and all,other annur~l data reporls, including fifth year reports, will be financed up to the maximum figures established by the annual Unified Work Program budgeting process. Due to the unique relationship between the County of Chesterfield and the Commission, the County agrees to make an annual payment to the Commission to cover its share of costs incurred by the Commission in providing transportation planning services. This payment shall be computed on the basis o£ the County's percentage o£ the urbanized area's population, based on the most recent Tayloe-Murphy figures. This percentage will be applied to the full cost (including overhead and payroll burden) o£ local match funds applied to federal grants, plus any straight local funds necessary, for the Commission to provide the transportation planning services as specified in the annual Unified Work Program. This payment shall be made on July 1 for the fiscal year beginning on that day. -19- Should it be jointly del'ei:mlned by the Tronsportatic~n ?olicy CbmmiH'ee and the Del:)orlment l'hof a com- ¢iet'e restudy of all facets o[ the Tronsporlatlon Plan would be necessary, approaching in scope Ihe iMIial '~t'udy, I'he {[llahc]llg O[ SUCh sludies will I)o ajDj)roved J)y J'ho local govornmclll's I)rlor 1'o ]nll-lal'lng ~,ludios. ARTICLE VIii - AMENDMENTS Amendments'l~o I'hl~ ~re.cnient m6'¥ be made by wr~ll'en agreement' l>elvceen II~e Courtly'and I'he Com- mlssion afl'er review and recommendal'~ons by I'he Tronsporl'alion Policy Commiffee. ARTICLE IX.- CIVIl_ RIGHTS ACT The. County~ its agei'd's~ emptoyees~ assigns! or successors~ and cmy peI:son or agency al: Whol'ever.not'ure, vi]ih when1 ~J' Jllay be conh'c~cl' or make an agreemenf~ shall co~ply w]lh fha I)I'DVJS]OIIS O[ TITLE VI of the Civil Rights Acl' of 1964 as sol' out in I'he Ai)peJadJx~ aH'ached herel'o ahd made a part o~ l'his coniracl' IN V?HITNESS \.'?H EREOF~ lbo County and l'he Commission have execut'ed this Agroemenf on I-t~e cloy year first wrltl'en al)ave. WITNESS COUNTY WIT N ESS AN ORDINANCE to amend and reordain Chapter IA, Section lA-3 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, providing for age limit of members and further providing exception as to junior rescue squad members. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: That Chapter IA, Section lA-3 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, be amended to read as follows: Section IA-3 Same---Age Limit Of Members; Exception As To Junior Rescue Squad Members. No such permit shall be issued to any person under the age of twenty-one years or to any firm, corporation or association which has a member or members under the age of twenty-one years, except, however, such volunteer rescue squads may establish junior rescue squads. The minimum age limit of such junior rescue squad members shall be fifteen years. Such junior members may participate in the activities of the squad as "stand-bys," and perform such other miscellaneous duties as adult members of such rescue squads may direct. Any junior'rescue squad member of a junior rescue squad who has attained the age of 18 years, holds an advanced first aid card, and when said junior member has been approved by the membership of his senior rescue squad, may be permitted by such squad to ride ambulances or other such emergency vehicles as the second member, when the other member is a senior squadman and driver of the vehicle. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage as provided by law. Adopted on September 25, 1974. RICHMOND NEWSPAPERS, INC. Publisher of ~ THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH SEP 1 I t974 Richmond, Va... .... ~ .............................. C This is to certify that the atta he~,~ ............ : .................................. was published in The Richmond<~Timez,Disparch, a newspaper published in the City of RichmonJ~ ~te of Vir~nia. SEP4 lg~4 ' ~ " 'SEPI~ 1914 .................................................. :~.. ........ :~ .......... ...' ............................... SEP 4 i~4 The first insertion being ~ven .......................................................... me this (~ .-.-. ~ ~L) Nora State of Virgqnia, City of Richmond: My commission expires 2 / 2 $ / 7 7 TITLE CHES~.v~ COUNTY ASSOJIATIGN VOLUNv~.w~ RESOUE SQUADS u hesterfield, V~r gi~ia ~nchester Volunteer Rescue Squad Forest Vie~ Volunteer Rescue Squad Bensley-Bermuda Volunteer Rescue Squad Ett~ick-Fmtoaca Volunteer Rescue Squad August 13, ~. M. W. Bu~nett Executive Secretary Ohesterfield O onnty uhesterfield, Virginia 23832 Raf: Chapter IA Section lA-3 Chesterfield Count~ Oode Dear ~M. Burnett, We, the members of the ~hesterfield ~;ounty Association of Volunteer Rescue Squads, respectfully request a change in the wording in the last paragraph of the above county ordinance to be changed from: "An~ junior squad member of $ j,,n~or rescue squad who has attained the age of eighteen years and holds an advanced first aid card is permitted to ride ambulances or other emergency vehicles as the third person when the other ~o members are members of the senior squad." to: "Ar~ junior squad member of a junior rescue squad who has attained the age of eighteen years and holds an advanced first aid card is permitted to ride ambulances er other emergency vehicles as the second member when the other member is s senior squadman and the driver of vehicle, when said junior member is approved to be the second member by the membership of his senior rescue squad." When this ordinance was enacted, 7-23-6~, our squads had approximately 4000 calls per year f~r assistance. Today we answer between 8000 to 9000 calls per y~sr. A great man~ of these calls come during the day when we are ex- .tremely short of personel. Nr. ~,L W. Burnett A large percentage of our junior restorers are part-time college students or are shift workers. This leaves them free to serve ou~ organizations during the day. They could help (and ~ will) give ns manpower du~ing the day. We have som~ well qualified 18 year olds who have undergone the same exten- sive training, and have passed it succes~ly, as our senior members. All of our members, seniors and juniors, take the same training. Each eighteen year old junior would be evaluated by the senior squad before they could become the "second man". We feel that all the other parts cf this aforementioned ordinance are still c~recte If this change is granted it will certainly aid us in giving better and faster service and coverage to the citizens of uhesterfield. Thanking you in advance for your consideration in this matter, we remain, Respectfully, CHES~.~ C(YONTY ASSOCIATIC~ VGEUN~ RESCUE SQUADS O. E. Greene, President FGLEST ~ VGLUNWW~ RESOUE SQUAD B~SLEY-B~R~DA VGLUNt~1~ RESC~ SQUAD ETLo~ICK-M~T~ACA V~UNTE~R RESEUE SQUAD g TAKE NOTICE lhat the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County,Virginia~ will on SeptembeD 25, 1974 at 11:30 a.m., in The County Board Room at Chesterfield Courthouse, take under consideration the re-adoption of the following ordinance: AN ORDIN~%NCE to amend and reordain Chapter 14, Section lA-3 of the Code of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, providing for age limit of members and further providing exception as to junior rescue squad members. The complete text of the above described ordinance is on file in the office of the County Administrator of the Board of ~pervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. All persons favoring or opposing the adoption of this ordinance are invited to attend this meeting. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD BY M.WoBurnett~ Clerk August 28, 1974 Richmond Times-Dispatch 333 E. Grace Street Richmond, Virginia Gentlemen: Please have published in the Times-Dispatch only, the attached ordinance on rescue squad members age limitt on September 4 and September 11, 1974. Please bill the County of Chesterfield for this. Sincerely, MWB:w Enclosure M.W.Burnett Kounty Administrator TAKE NOTICE That the Chesterfield Cou~of Supervisors will hold a public hearing on Wednesday,~r 2~ 1974 at ll:30 A.M. to consider amendmen~ to the Zonin~ u~~c of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia to add to Section 15-3 the following: "(f) Any permitted or conditional use allowed in theB-3 or M-3 District~; to delete the last sentence of Section 28-2 (5) and to delete Section 4,3 (d) reserving the number. Copies of this amendment are on file in the Planning Department, Room 307, Office Building, Chesterfield Courthouse, Chesterfield, Virginia, for public examination between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. of each regular business day. Michael C. Ritz Director of Planning County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia I~1~" ~1~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' I~ IO '~ ~J o o ~ ~ · ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m I~1~~1J~ o ~l~J~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ =. /~ D ~ ~ Icl ~ ..~' ~ ~ ~ ~ I I~ ~ ~ J~ ~ ~ ~J~J~ ~ U ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ I ~1. Im ~ · / ~ ~ ~l~/~. :~ ~ ~~ ~~ u ~ I~ I o o J. ~ o MI~'I~ ~' ~ ' _ ~ ~ ~ M~ I~ I ~ ~ /~ ~ ~ I~/~ ~ ~ ~ J~ u ~ _ ~1' I o ~ i~1 ~ /o ItU ~ ~ ~ ~ ' / // ~ ~ ~ m ' '~T'] I // ~ = " I // ~ ~ltdl. o~b. tan. Vtrtl~a Yours very truZy, JO,/nb ~-._r~. Cant~ ~mr l)tmtrJ~t Hr. H. Stdred Mrs. Lots S. Chep~ll 2909 Bon O-ko Ben Air, Vtrstnta Deaf Hr. & Hro.~ i.~ i · September ~rojeR b. 07032-6B/13 ProPOrCrY~ S. ~ , fo S.tnee ~u do eoC vteh co dedtoate TmmtT five DoXX.erm ($_:ZS.00) tm hereby ~l~ Emmemenc. mn off,er of as outXtued tn Ohm ottd adi~t, for the m of your Land aetoryi fatXur, to repXy utt! be Xnce~preted aa rofuJdiX. any C~.qumott°m8 rmSmrdtms the above, p:Loaoe feet fre~ co eaXt ac Yours very tru].y, A. J. ]Srtdp. tJB/eb ~te. to: &. J. trppeLa. Supe~r- NtdLothtan Dt.crtet _J. ¢. FaXmonmr. CouncY Assessor so~trc A. ~,miaCer. County ans~ M. W. Burnett, County Administrator 0 m . CARSON L. SOPHIA S MILAM ELDA S. ALFORD DBA I00 P~ . .Ed -~,v, LOT 27 ~IC ' ' G 4B9 ~~~ ~ HARD E & MILDRED . ,%, ,,~ 9~67.~ ~-"',J,. ~,~ : B.702 PG.2~~O0 PLAT SHOWINO EASEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED CROSS~NG THE LAND NOW ~ELONGING M. ELDRED & LOIS S. CHAPPELL , MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT, CHESTERFIELD ~OUNTY,VIRGINIA. NOTE: BEAqlNG5 REFER TO VIRGINIA RECTANGULAR CRID 3YSTEM-:,DUTH ZONE- 19~7 N.A, DATUm. NOTE: PERMANENT EASEMENT ENCLOSED CONSTRUCTION c'ASEMENt F~CLO~FD DATE: JUNE 2Bt1974 OXFORD ko,~SEC T I 0 N 'C' BLOCK'S' -.~\ e. ~\,~- L EASEMENT ,54.37 EXIST. 8' EASEMENT LAWRENCE D. a MARY ALICE HOS.~E \ D.B. 919 PC. IS1 [Ncr EASE. M~ R. STUART R OYER & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS RICHMOND , VIRGINIA. 50 o 50 I00 · "7032-6B .23 Sepreubor 20, 197~ re: Prelect Ho. 7032-6A/26 Yropor~y: . _ ~ I. Ilobbe. Jr.0 . ._ . f One ltundxed ~cy-fl~o JOXLfur.O ~,vs~.)..w; __ ~. udde for the O · use 0£ your land &o ou~thed S,n eM ~ a~ee, aanc. A, J, Bridles &JB/ub WALTER .R.& JOYCE H. SCHERGER LOT 9 , ~//~'L0'T JOHN B.' DOROTHY D,B. 82.0 10' DRAINAGE (,EXISTING) ~.,,,/,~/'~ ' LOT II 10 HOBBS JF E. HOBB$ PG.425 ROD EASE. 52 +04.00 M.H. 52+2:3.26 LOT 5 MOHAWK BLOCK"B" HENRY J. & LULA 52 + 95.00 U. HAURAND STAF FORD SHIRLEY D.B. 662 M. WH1TE A. WHITE PG. 78 '36 .H. 5:3 + 38,60 LOT 4. DNSTRUCTION EASEMENT ORVILLE J. RAMSF'Y CAROL L. RAMSEY D.B. 1043 PG. 104 -- 54+2.3.00 ~/// LOT 12 0 FRED "- '~' ~ 1 ~," ~,~,11~I,~$~.~ .... E- .-- 172.04' ~ H.& rxATH~RINE ~ J ~s,,~48 .~ 'S. DANIEL,JR. '~i"j~ ~ANNY L / ~t'f. ' GROVE o+ o. az - PLAT SHOWING EAS~ _MENTS ACQUIP~ ,~D CROSSING THE BELONGING TO JOHN B. JR. DOROTHY HOBBS GREEN I PERMANENT EASEMENT ENCLOSED IN NED CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ENCLOSED iN 30.00 AH'D. PERMANENT EASEMENT MIDLOTHIAN CHESTERFIELD VIRGINIA REFER T.r) ¥tR(~iNIA I",EC, TAIF~UI AR bY.SFEM-SOLFTi~, ZOi;Z-192/ N.A. DATUM. ASSOCIATES ~ "-~ ~ 2-'.Jr E: I I - 28-73 TO LAND & DISTRICT COUNTY~ Richmond ~ Vt. Sep~r 20, 197& RI: lhro.*ji~t No, 7032-61/17 Hap Sect:ion: 1,0-2 Property: Louis A. Skidmore & Skidmore: of T .V~n. ~y.-£1ve Dollars ($25.00) is hereby adds £or the use of P1me ~dvife by Fridays Septeeber 27, Lq71 if satlo£aecory~ failure Co reply will be interpreted as -e£usal. Any questions re~ardins the above, please at an~ CLue. Yours very Cruly, A. J. Brldaee ~t of~hty ~nsineer AJB/eb SOPHtAS. MtLAM J :LDAS. ALFORD ~9]L:4~1.~.[ ~ ~" .OT 2g .OT 2.8 LEWIS W. KRANTZ. )B.III5 I OXFORD (~o.(o.~SEC T I O N 'C' BLOCK'S' :so,v · '(/9/ EASEMENT ~ o 07'4 X o P~RMANENT IRAMINTA B. ' WILKINSON [)'81771 PG353 PLAT SHOWING EASEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED CROSSING THE LAND NOW BELONGING LOUIS A. & N~CY P. S~IDMORE MIDLOTHIAN DISffR]CT, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA. GRID SYSTEM - 50UTH ZONE - Ig27 N. A. DATUM . NOTE: PERMANENT ~ASEMENT ENCLOSED IN CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ENCLOSED IN GREEN J DATE: DUNE ~8 1974 ~I~D:JULY ~ 1974 'I- M ii. CLARr~ B . EXIST. 8' EASEMEkrr j ROB£R~, 'D.~.4.7.6~ MARY ALICE HOB~EJ W,~u" DG.g~.' LAWRENCE D. & D.B. gi9 PG. Igl STUART ROYER & A330ClATE 3 CONSULTING ENGINE E R3 RICHMON D , VIRGINIA 50 0 ' ? ~o0 7032-6B 17 September 20, xg?~ Yours very Patuter, Court ~~ County Adsin~trm~or LOT 12. 0+6 2_.00-- C FRED HAROLD DANIEL- / JR. / ~ KATHERINE STORY ': DANIEL ::, D.B. 94-0 PG. 424 EXIST, lO'DRAINAGE EASEMENT-~. LOT 3 / 54 + 89.6~ 0 * 30.00 AHD .,,_2 ---~..~._ ORVILLE J.& CAROL L. RAMSEY -- M.H. 1+67.05 FANNY L. GROVE D.B. 378 PG. 383 MOHAWK BLOCK "B" ... PERMANENT EASEMENT CONSTRUC"TtON EASEMENT V - -- '~°~3~'~°" ~ X 151.38' 'k +85.40 \ / 6 ~IOTE~E~/~'.iENT E~,.,:JiT E~4CLGSED IN RED ~"-~ ~/BE. ACQUIRED CROSS l~-~O" T' CONSTRUCTIOn4 EASEMENT ENCLCSZD i~ GREEN AND NOW BELO~GI '~ TO NOTE: ZE,:~"~C, 3 ~EFE;R TO V!i~:?~IF~!A ~':?CTA~'.CU1. ~R ~ t 1~ ' ~A~S: ,~-~s-73 MiDL.OTHIAN DISTRICT, CHESTERfiELD COUNTY, Hr. Eoanoth D. ALford Nra. ELda S. Alford 9202 F. Ibreh Areh Vf~LLqe Drtve, lAe~, Va. Pro]eec 10o..703;~-6B/0 Pz~pez~: ram~r,.b D. AXfOrd & - S A'- ~_ t _V('e- eat~afeecory~ a~Aure ~o rep17 utll be Lacezpreced refusal. Any qJmatloue rqardLus clLo above, pXoaae feel free co ~all a~ my A.J. lrLdAea An/ab ~opXee Cp: A. J. ~~a, SuporvLoor-~XochLan DLocrXec ~~_a. ]Pafater, OmmCy ~heer u LOT 7 O Mid. 2~ CARSON L.&. SOPHIA S. MILAM D.B.655 PG. 408 LOT 39 ~_ S~z,'4~'24' E !-:,ENNETH D. & (LDA S. ALFORD D.B.110O PG. 589 o tm .J C ';o cd .<O D t....q ,,ar- Z~''. -r~i om ODN STRLXT. T~ON OT 29 3T 28 UEW~S V'L t31115 PC722 ;LST. 16' 'ALLEY - PERM~N-"NT /I DO LOT i9 0 S. YESSECN ~.937 PG. 541 ~O ;. LO'[ 2.0 .-OT 27 Pg, R~..~-2,',,"T ; ~ ~, \ '(". ii ..... .'RD E' & MtLDg'ED-V4". EA.~,~:~"r~ (U F,~u.%?',~_~ &B 990 pG.A-o~ ,,,2'?,^ 8. PG.3,5,3 :. s~.~-_ ~ ~' ~ '~ ..LISA &N'~ .... ~ :-~' --'~ ~ ~o'~ PLAT SHOWING EASEMENTS TO BE ACQUIRED [,~Ooo,.so TNE LAND NOW BELONGING TO KENNETH D. & g~A S. ALFORD MIDLOTNLAN D~S~RICT, CHESTERFlgLD COUNTY,VIRGiNIA' NOTE: PERMANENT EASEMENT ENCLOSED tN R~D ~,I~Oo~D IN OXFORD SECTION 'C'BLOCK'S' \ . 0~ j :,at.. co & A- ~ ~t PG..o,`:.. T LO% A -''e' . g Lo"f B ~O B£R _., ' n B- "w~LSL)r~ EASEMENT R. STUART R O Y E R & A 5 ...S;O C IA T E 5 CONSULTING ENGtNE E R5 P. IC HMON D , VIRGINIA .. 5o o 50 So,9 EXIST. 8' EASgMEN~ LAWRENCE 'D. & MARY ALICE HOEg4~'E D.B. CjI9 PG_IgI 70 32-(;3 CLOVER HILL DISTRICT SEWER RESOLUTION Whereas, in order to provide sewer service to the Clover Hill H~gh School and Brandermill by January 1, 1976, the Bailey Bridge Pump Station, which requires at best approximately 15 months of design and construction time, must begin promptly. Whereas, since the money markets are requiring the highest rates in economic history, to issue the proposed Sewer Revenue Bond, which will finance the Bailey Bridge Pump Station, would be commiting the County to pay abnormally high rates for a twenty-five year period. Therefore, County of Chesterfield resolves: To commit to issue bonds upon terms to be mutually agreed upon, guaranteed by Brandermill, to fund a sewer system in Clover Hill Magisterial District, generally described as the Bailey Bridge Pump Station, the Lower Nuttree Trunk, and the Bright Hope System, including cost of construction, interest, financing, legal, engineering charges or costs, and other related costs, now estimated at $2,400,000. It is intended by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield that the adoption of this resolution shall constitute the taking of "official action" toward the issuance of the aforementioned bonds, within the meaning of the regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Service Code of 1954, as amended. 2. However, to delay the issuing of the Sewer Revenue Bond until the money market returns to normalacy (an anticipated six-month delay). 3. To proceed expediously with the final design and construction of Bailey Bridge Pump Station. To receive from Brandermill prior to beginning construction a $500,000 assignment of the Brandermill loan from The Equitable as security for the County, which the County will release as of the issuing of the Sewer Revenue Bond. To allocate the school board's $200,000 investment toward the sewer program to the Bailey Bridge Pump Station as additional security if Brandermill did not move forward. 6. To authorize Brandermill to proceed with the design and construction of Ithe Lower Nuttree Trunk. The 1,O00-unit Bright Hope Gravity/Pump Station System will not begin until it is determined by the County that the Gravity Trunk Sewer is not to be used by the County. 7. To refund to the County and Brandermill the construction and interest costs incurred by each on the project upon issuing and from the proceeds of the Sewer Revenue Bond. Interest rebates to Brandermill and the County will be at the C~unt7'~ cc~t of T~ney. GE;O, W, 1~400RE~ JR, TREAeaUR~I~ COUNTY OF' 13HESTERFIELD OFFICE OF THE TREASLIREI~ CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA September 19, 1974 Mr. M. W. Burnett, County Administrator County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett: Cash balances of the General County and School Operating Funds will not be sufficient to pay operating expenses for the month of September and second half of 1974 real estate taxes will not be due until December 5, 1974. I respectfully request that the treasurer be authorized to negotiate a short-term loam not to exceed $2,000,000 in accordance with Sec. 15.1-545 and 15.1-546 of the Code of Virginia. Very truly yours, Geo. W. Moore, Jr. Treasurer GWM/mcg COLONEL E. P. GILL CHIEF OF POLICE E. T. SM[TH CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES W. E. MARTIN CAPTAIN OF POLICE COU NTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE D EPARTM EN T September 23, 1974 Mr. M. W. Burnett County Administrator Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: I have this date submitted letters to the Honorable Ernest P. Gates and the Honorable D. W. Murphey, stating my intention to retire on March 1, 1975 from the Chesterfield County Police Department. At that time I will have completed more than thirty-seven (37) years of service. I sincerely appreciate the support that you have always given the Department and, especially the advice and guidance you have given me. In my conversation with you a few weeks ago you indicated that you had my name in your little black book in the event you ever needed a friend. I sincerely hope that it remains in the book and that you will use it frequently. If an occasion should arise whereby I may serve you personally or the county, as a whole, I hope you will feel free to call on me. During the discussions of the 1974/1975 budget I indicated to the Chair- man of the Police Committee that it was my intention to retire during this fiscal year and I told him that I would give ample notice. Most singerely, E. P. Gill Chief of Police September 17, 197~ Mr. William D. Poole Planning Department Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia PHONE 733-6519 IBORED WELLS - OtRILLED WELLS Route 4 Bo× 35{3 Petersburg, Virgima 23803 23832 Dear ~lr. Poole: We want to take this opportunity to say thank you for the chance to bid on your job at Rockwood Perk. I will break the bid up into several parts, so you can figure the cost of the concession stand and the cost of the rest rooms. PUBLIC TOILETS 2 - 1,250 gallon septic tanks @250.00 ea. 1 - pump tank 2" forced main from septic tank to master distribution box Heavy duty sewer pump float operated 115 volts Pipe fittings, ?" check valve, electrical wire from pump to outside of building where sewer comes out CONCESSION STAND 1,000 gallon septic tank ~" A.B.S. plastic main with cleanouts every 50' from concession stand to master distribution box DR~INFIELDS for concession stand g public toilets with distribution boxes 500 gallon master distribution box with baffles g removable tops ~ small distribution boxes @t5.00 ea. Sewer pipe from main distribution box to small boxes 4,032 sq. ft. of drainfield @.70 ft. $500.00 160.00 630.00' 450.00 90.00 160.00 1 , 100. O0 ' 180.00 60.00 120.00 , 2~822.40 $6,272.40 This bid does not include any seeding or finished grading. This bid is good for 60 days from date submitted. GENTRY ¥:IELL WORKS, INC. Harvey T. Baxter, III HTB/j j h 356 S. Cra:~r Rd, P. 0, Box 612 Pang, 'Va. 23803 AND ESTIMATE (8O4) 732-4341 ~-PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO uhe~berfield (.;ounty STREET Courthouse Complex l'!eF~rtment CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE Chesterfield ~ Vir~inia ARCHITECT I DATE OF PLANS I ~., We hereby propose to furnish materials and labor necessary for the completion of: Page No. 1 of 1 Pages P HO NE DATE JOB NAME ;~ockwood ~'ark JOB LOCATION Courf,!~c~use JOB PHONE De,tic tank, pump. and drainfield system Lq accordance with per~.~[t issued by Chesterfield County ~{ead.th D¢~tment .'~ated 1/3]/7~ signed by ~.~. Yho~s W. Grab, m~, Jr. We will not do ~ny electrical work for connecting pump system or do ~y gradiag and se~d[n.q of l&nd. WE PROPOSE hereby to furnish material and labor -- complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: ~ :.~eve~ ~}',ousa~d 5ix Hundred ~ixty Five and No/lOO"~x-'~'~--~-',~.;~-~-~? Payment to be made as follows: dollars ($7.665,~ ), All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a sdbstantial workmanlike Authorized Signature Note: This p o~s..al may be withdrawn by us if not accepted ~ithin days. manner according to specifications submitted, per standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon wrdten orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature Signature , ~.~ September 23, m74~. Mr. William D. Poole Pl'~nnin'g DepdrLment County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 8500 COURTHOUSE ROAD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 2383;2 JOHNSONS' CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF SEPTIC SYSTEMS PHONE: 748-5695 TERMS BID to install septic system at Rockwood Park, Courthouse Road, Chesterfield County, Virginia according to specifi'cations on per dated January 31, 1974, issued by the Chesterfield County Health Department with the exception that this price includes cast iron pipe WHICH tS REQUIRED under the road instead of plastic pipe shown in specifications Price does not include: 1) A second pump and pumping station to go under existing g line if required in lieu of gravity flow system as prese specified by permit. 2) Removal and/or hauling away of any trees or stumps. 3) Final grading and seeding--price includes rough grading Chesterfield County will furnish ll5 volt electrical service to the pumping station(s). The above job will be guaranteed for workmanship and materials for one year. The pump(s) will be covered by a one-year warrant S ,tly )nly. $6,650 VV~, ~R SU,-'LY F-1 SEWAGE DISPOSA ~ YST~M L_~~ (1) Void after (12) twelve months. (2~ 'Automatically cancelled when site conditi0~.~e, i.nged.~om t~se shown on permit. (3) Automatica.lly cancelled should facts later become known that a potential~'~rd would be c, rf~ated/by continuing installation. Occupant Address Phone. .. . ,~ r ($ubdivisiort Sln.'e! ~ Road Name. ~ctio~ or__Lot No.) Other I ' ' Automatic Washing M~hine ~ Yes ~N~ FOR: ~ Dwelling ~ ~ . Con~mption~ gal. perday Additional was~ , WATER SUPPLY (Existing) Cla~ .... Approved ~ ~' Other ~~ ft, to be grouted ft, / - · (Unless supported Dy pos~idence Class III is to be considered as to be installed.) SOlE_STUDY Naturally drained, suitable by sigh, I~Ye$ I--tNojTechnicalCta~sification · (2)Est,mated.e=o,,.t,o.R... '-'0 O "-=. F-1 =~.o Ld -.' II .erco,at,onTest.eq.,red I--1 Yes "o ~ (Minute~ ~ inch) ~ (Minutes per i~h to near~t 10 minut~) Depth to Grey MOtt,. ~~_ inches (estimate over 4 ft.) OTHER Surfacedraina~requir~.~yes ~No OTHER DRAINAGE ~'~DETAILSOFCONSTRUCTION Wat~tightSepticT~kgf /~/~""~2~¢~-2.-{~~'~::~ Materi~r , LiquidCapacity~6'~ gallons Depth of ag~e~,, from ~,e of tile to ~,,om of ditch~ ~ inche,. . Allowable fall ~,o ¢' inches. Total aggre~te minimum depth / ~ inches or more. D~pth of drainfield to be'~ --~ inches from ~rface of o~iginal ground. Distance from wed to septic tank~0 feet; distance from well to drainfield~0 feet. F~iough Sketch of Premises (including adjacent properties if pertinent, Showing Location of Lot Line, Buildings, Water Supplies, Sewage Disposal Systems, Trees, end Other Possible ";ources of Contamination of Water Supplies, by Indicating Distances and Slope with regard to one another. stallatlon is ready for inspection, if any Sewage Disposal System, or part thereof, is covered before being inspected by the ~ealth Department, it shall be urn. covered at the direction of the Health Director or hi~ agent. CONDITIONS OISCOVERED DURING INSTALLATION ~*~ REQUIRE ~JUSTMENTS OF _ SYSTEM DESIGN. Chants from above sp~ification~ require Health Department epproval~efore be}rig made. / / _/. ~ ,¢~ _ _ ,//. /, //. eased on the above tnf~mation~ the undersigned r~om~ends that this ~rmit be issued. / / ' / /' LHS - 121 REV. 12/71 {R~lewtng A~thoriw) /~ ~~~------?f~// ~ /l~an,t;r~. nr~~or) ' ~-f-- Virginia State Dmp~rtmmt of H~lth' bUPLI~T~ /3 VIRGINIA: At anaadjourned meetir~ of the Board of Surpervisors of Chesterfield Countyj held in the Board Room at Chester£~eld Courthouse, on September 25, 1974, at 9:00 A. H. This day came ~eorge W. Moore, Jr,, Treasurer, advtsin§ the Board that in t~ current money market situation it is impossible to borrow money at the statutory six per cent interest rate, and requests Board to raise this interest rate limitation. On motion of .~r? ~~'S... BE IT RESOLVED, that George W, Moore, Jr., County Treasurer, b.~, and he hereby is, authorized to obtain and secure loans in the open market at such prime rate or rates of interes~ as prevails £n the Richmond marke2 among R£c ~.~._nd major banks. C. G. MANUEL, CHAIRMAN. LT. JOHN SIMMON$~ VICE CHAIRMAN CHIEF ROBERT L. EANES, ROSIE CLEMENTS, SECRETARY RICHARD HOLLANDER LEO MYERS, SUPERVISOR C. LYNN NEWCOMB MINOR STONE JUDGE JOHN H. THOMAS JAMES WADKINS DR. W. Po WAGNER COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD HIGHWAY SAFETY COMMISSION CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832 September 24, 1974 Mr. M. W. Burnett County Administrator Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett: The Chesterfield Highway Safety Commission hereby request the Board of Supervisors to make the followering appointment: Mr. A. L. White, as a new member to the Highway Safety Commission. Si~5p~rely, ~nalrman i , CGM/rwc