82S096Ju&y-&;v-$98~-B6
Sepeembe~-&8~-&98&-B~
November 23, 1983 BS
STAFF REPORT
82S096
Rock Port Lane Company and Realty Feasibility & Marketing Corp.
Matoaca Magisterial District
West line of Courthouse Road
REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential Townhouse-For-Sale
(R-TH) with a Conditional Use Planned Development.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval for the following reasons:
me
The proposed land use and zoning is a reasonable transition between
commercial use to the north and single family residential use to the
south.
Through the imposition of conditions, the Commission and Board can
insure land use compatibility with existing single family residential
development east of and adjacent to this parcel.
CONDITIONS
The following conditions notwithstanding, the Master Plan prepared by
Charles C. Townes and Associates, revised June 8, 1983, shall be con-
sidered the plan of development.
2. A maximum of 98 units shall be permitted.
Be
Conditions stated herein notwithstanding, all bulk requirements of
the Residential Townhouse-For-Sale (R-TH) District shall be appli-
cable.
A fifty (50) foot buffer shall be maintained along the eastern and
southern property lines. Ail existing vegetation, except underbrush,
shall be maintained within this buffer. Existing vegetation shall be
supplemented with additional plantings, and/or berming to provide
effective year-round screening. As part of schematic plan approval,
e
t
a landscaping plan depicting this requirement shall be submitted.
Landscaping of these buffer areas shall be accomplished in conjunc-
tion with phasing of development.
Ail public roads shall have a minimum fifty (50) foot right of way.
Ail public roads shall have a pavement width not less than forty (40)
feet, face of curb to face of curb. These roads shall be constructed
to VDH&T specifications and taken into the State system prior to the
issuance of occupancy permits.
Proposed Heatherwood Lane shall be stubbed into adjacent property to
the west. At the terminus of the road, a temporary turnaround shall
be constructed to State specifications.
No grading, clearing or other construction shall be permitted until
such time that all approved construction easements and right of way
are obtained for the Courthouse Road/Heatherwood Lane intersection.
10.
No more than fifty (50) building permits shall be issued until a sec-
ond public road access is provided.
Should VDH&T and Planning Staff determine that Cobblestone Court will
not be extended as a public road, a permanent cul-de-sac shall be
constructed at the northern terminus, at the developer's expense, and
accepted into the State system.
11.
12.
When a second public road access is provided, the remaining fifty-
five (55) building permits may be issued. Prior to obtaining occu-
pancy for the last fifty-five (55) units, the second public road ac-
cess shall be taken into the State system.
If desired by the property owner, the driveway to Tax Map 49-12 (1)
Parcel 24 shall be relocated at the expense of the developer to pro-
vide access to Heatherwood Lane.
Recommend that proffered Condition #1 not be accepted in its present form for
the following reasons:
It is the County's policy that water service be p~ovided in front of
properties rather than the rear of properties. This policy has been
adopted due to the fact that it is difficult to obtain access to the
water meter if located in the rear.
If the water line is provided to the rear of these properties, future
extension of the line northward along Courthouse Road will be
difficult.
Acceptance of proffered Condition #1, deleting references to the location of
water lines would be acceptable. Recommend acceptance of proffered Conditions
2 through 6.
2 82S096/BSNV3/U
PROFFERED CONDITIONS
3.
4.
5.
A water and sewer line shall be extended to the back property line of
the houses along Courthouse Road. This is to be one (1) water and
one (1) sewer line, stubbed off in a location that would permit these
homeowners to connect to the system at their expense.
We will agree to a maximum of 6 units per acre.
We will agree to a maximum of 2 facades alike on any one building.
We will agree to a maximum of 10 units to each building.
We will agree to a minimum of 1,000 square feet for each unit (town-
house).
We will agree to exterior material of either cedar siding, hardboard
siding, brick, or a combination of the three.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Location:
Lies off west line of Courthouse Road,
measured from point approximately 1,900 feet
south of intersection with Hull Street Road.
Tax Map 49-11 (1) Part of Parcels 14 and 16
(Sheet 14).
Existing .Zoning:
A and R-12
Size:
16.3 acres
Existing Land Use:
Vacant
Adjacent Zoning & Land Use:
North - M-1 with Conditional Use Planned
Development and A, Single family res-
idential use or vacant.
South - A, Single family residential use or
vacant.
East - A, Single family residential use or
vacant.
West - A, Vacant.
Utilities:
8 inch water line located in Rockwood Square
Shopping Center north of request site. Use
of public water intended. Property lies in
Falling Creek ~sewage drainage area. Trunk
sewer line located along Courthouse Road. A
detailed hydraulic analysis required to de-
termine whether existing sewers along
Horner's Run and in the area have sufficient
capacity to handle proposed development.
3 82SO96/BSNV3/U
Environmental Engineering:
Schools:
Fire Service:
Transportation & Traffic:
Property gently sloping to sloping and when
cleared, slight chance for erosion. Soils
fairly suited for proposed use. Final plans
should show subsurface drainage around
building sites with low elevation. At least
five (5) building sites have severe drainage
limitations. Property drains to Falling
Creek via Horner's Run. Rapid commercial-
ization and high density development along
Horner's Run has caused accelerated degrada-
tion of the stream; therefore, improvements
will be necessary along creek. Limits of
100 year backwater at Courthouse Road pipe
crossing may be significantly altered due to
high density development. It may be neces-
sary to obtain off-site easements to ade-
quately convey the run-off from this devel-
opment. No filling permitted in i00 year
flood plain backwater of Horner's Run to
achieve buildable locations.
Approximately 69 students will be generated
by this development. Lies in the Gordon
Elementary School Attendance Zone: existing
capacity - 800, existing enrollment - 778;
in the Swift Creek Middle School Attendance
Zone: capacity - 1,500, enrollment - 1,579;
in the Clover Hill High School District:
existing capacity - 1,200, enrollment -
1,275. Additional facilities are planned in
the future.
Midlothian Fire Station, Company #5. Ca-
pability adequate at present. County water
and fire hydrant placement must be provided
in compliance with national recognized stan-
dards. Horizontal stand-
pipes and fire lanes for rear accessibil-
ity may also be required.
It is estimated that approximately 735 aver-
age daily trips will be generated by this
development. Traffic will predominantly
access to Courthouse Road which had a 1982
Traffic Tabulation of 9,750 vehicles per
day.
Internal public roads should be constructed
to a typical design section, established by
the County, for development of this density
and magnitude. These public roads should be
4 ~,~ 82S096/BSNV3/U
stubbed to adjacent property for future
extension.
Following the Commission's May meeting, the
applicant submitted a redesign of the Court-
house Road/Heatherwood Lane intersection.
This change increases the Heatherwood Lane
right of way at the intersection by twenty-
five (25) feet to a total of seventy-five
(75) feet and moves it to the south. Acqui-
sition of construction, drainage, slope and
sight easements, and additional right of way
will be necessary. Due to the twenty (20)
foot shift of Heatherwood Road, a construc-
tion easement may be necessary along the
southern proposed right of way line. De-
tails for pavement widths on Courthouse Road
are not clear.
Staff recommends that the developer con-
struct additional pavement, twenty-six (26)
feet from centerline of Courthouse Road.
This may require acquisition of additional
right of way exceeding that indicated on the
plans, or additional pavement widening to
the east side of Courthouse Road. The
eighty (80) foot long storage lane for left-
hand turning movement into the development
must be increased to a minimum of 100 feet,
according to VDH&T requirements. The cross
section that accompanied the plans indicates
that curb and gutter will be installed with
storm sewer under portions of the proposed
pavement widening. Due to problems with
maintenance of this storm, sewer, the VDH&T
has indicated that storm sewer should be
located outside the curb and gutter. This
will require additional right of way or
easements.
The developer has proposed to relocate
driveway to Cahoon property from Courthouse
Road to Heatherwood Lane. Staff recommends
that driveway to Nevel property also be re-
located to Heatherwood Lane to eliminate
undesirable access to Courthouse Road adja-
cent to the proposed new intersection.
Sight distance is also a problem at the
proposed new intersection and easements will
be needed or the developer could redesign
the Courthouse Road intersection to accom-
plish some of the widening to the east
5 82S096/BSNV3/U
within the existing right of way. This
could reduce the necessity for some addi-
tional right of way and easement along the
west side of Courthouse Road. Widening to
the east of Courthouse Road would be costly
due to the depth and location of ditches.
Also, it will be necessary to construct curb
and gutter along the widened sections.
No more than fifty (50) building permits may
be issued as long as proposed Heatherwood
Lane is the only public road access. Staff
would support allowing construction of an
additional ten (10) units, provided a pri-
vate drive is extended from the stub of
Cobblestone Court north to Hull Street Road.
At such time that a second public road is
provided, the pri~ate drive should be closed
and the remaining number of units
constructed.
Staff will address and make more specific
recommendations on the Courthouse Road ac-
cess at the time of schematic plan (tenta-
tive subdivision) consideration.
General Plan:
Single family residential use.
DISCUSSION
The applicants are requesting rezoning to Residential Townhouse-For-Sale
(R-TH) with a Conditional Use Planned Development. A maximum of 98 Town-
house-for-Sale units is proposed. The area surrounding the request parcel
is typified by mixed land uses. Adjacent property to the east, fronting
along Courthouse Road, has been developed predominantly for single family
residential use, while property to the north has been zoned for either
industrial or commercial use and is being developed accordingly. Property
to the south and west is zoned Agricultural (A) and is vacant. It is an-
ticipated that at some future date, property to the west will be developed
for higher density residential use. Higher density 'residential use of
this parcel is appropriate because it provides a transition between the
commercial and industrial uses located along the Route 360 corridor and
the single family residential development to the south.
Although the proposed land use is appropriate, particular attention should
be paid to proper site design so as to insure quality development and min-
imize the impact on existing single family residences in the area. In
that respect, appropriate buffer conditions should be imposed along the
eastern and southern boundaries of the parcel. Also, care should be taken
to insure an appropriate intersection at Courthouse Road and Heatherwood
Lane. If conditions are imposed, as stated herein, and bulk requirements
of the R-TH zone are met, Staff is of the opinion that the proposed land
6 82SO96/BSNV3/U
use can be compatible with area development and provide a proper transi-
tion between the commercial uses and industrial uses along Route 360 and
the single family residential uses to the east and south of the request
parcel.
CASE HISTORY
Planning Commission Meeting (10/26/82):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case for
thirty (30) days.
Planning Commission Meeting (11/23/82):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case for
sixty (60) days.
Applicant (1/4/83):
The applicant has requested another deferral of thirty (30) days to allow
additional time to meet with area property owners.
Planning Commission Meeting (1/25/83):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case for
thirty (30) days. The Commission indicated their intent to dispose of the
case at their February meeting as a number of deferrals had already been
granted.
Planning Commission Meeting (2/22/83):
The Commission deferred this case for sixty (60) days to allow the appli-
cant time to prepare plans for the Courthouse Road widening and proposed
Heatherwood Lane.
Staff, VDH&T, Applicant, Applicant's Engineers (4/8/83):
Plans for Courthouse Road widening and proposed Heatherwood Lane were re-
viewed and discussed. Staff requested additional information, showing
cross sections along proposed Heatherwood Lane, so that it can be deter-
mined what the impact will be on adjacent property owners.
Planning Commission Meeting (4/26/83):
At the request of the applicant, the Commission deferred this case for
thirty (30) days.
7 82S096/BSNV3/U
Staff (5/9/83):
Revised plans, proposing a total of 115 units, were reviewed and the con-
ditions stated herein were amended accordingly. The revised plans conform
to R-TH bulk requirements.
Planning Commission Meeting (5/24/83):
The Commission deferred this case for thirty (30) days to allow the ap-
plicant to complete negotiations on the purchase of the property located
in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Proposed Heatherwood Lane
and Courthouse Road. The purpose of acquisition is to allow the proposed
Heatherwood Lane to be shifted southward to minimize the amount of ease-
ments and right of way required along Courthouse Road, north of the pro-
posed intersection.
Applicant and Staff (6/10/83):
Revised plans were received and Staff's comments are addressed in the
"Transportation Section" of this report.
Planning Commission Meeting (6/28/83):
On motion of Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. Thomas, the Commission resolved
to recommend approval of this request, subject to the conditions stated
herein. Further, the Commission resolved to recommend acceptance of the
proffered condition, deleting references to "water lines."
AYES: Unanimous.
Board of Supervisors Meeting (7/27/83):
The Board deferred this request for sixty (60) days to allow the applicant
and area property owners an opportunity to study this case further.
Board of Supervisors Meeting (9/28/83):
On motion of Mr. Robertson, seconded by Mr. Daniel, the Board, at the re-
quest of the applicant, deferred this case for sixty (60) days.
Applicant (11/14/83):
Proffered conditions 2 through 6 were received.
8 82S096/BSNV3/U
The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, November 23, 1983, beginning at 2:00
p.m. will take under consideration this request.
82SO96/BSNV3/U
8-2
LUMLAY RI
0
C
0
C
I
0
I
400
I
800
SOIL SUITABILITY
GOOD
FAIR, SEVERE EROSION HAZARD WHEN CLEARED
POOR, SEVERE DRAINAGE LIMITATION
,', 82S096-1
./