Loading...
05-25-1999 PacketMeeting Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS May 25, 1999 AGENDA Item Number: Page 2, Subject: County Administrators Comments County Administrator's Comments: CountyAdministrator: BoardAction Requested: Summary of Information: Presentation of gift from the Lord Mayor of Chesterfield, England to the citizens of Chesterfield County in honor of our 250th Anniversary. To be presented by Ms. Nancy Carter Crump, Director of the Chesterfield County Historical Society. Attachment~: ~-q Yes ~ ;l'itle' Co-chair 250th 001_ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Subject: County Administrator Comments Item Number: 2. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: Model County Government Approximately 6~outstanding students from Chesterfield County High Schools will be "shadowing" county officials on-Thursday, May 27. The purpose of Model County Govemment is to give students a first hand look at the operations of their local government. One student from each high school was selected to shadow the members of the Board of Supervisors. Those students will assist with the 250th celebration at 1:00. The remaining students will introduce themselves formally during the 3:30 board meeting. Skip Todd, Extension 4-H Agent, will handle the introductions of the students. Model County Government is coordinated by the Extension Service in cooperation with Youth Services and the schoolsDep~tment of Social Studies. _ v Richard A. Nu~nally ,~' Attachments: Yes ~ No SCHEDULE MODEL COUNTY GOVERNMENT PROGRAM May 25, 26, 27, 1999 Chesterfield County Schools Chesterfield County Extension Office (4-H) Chesterfield County Youth Services May 25 May 26 May 27 12:30- 3:30 p.m. 3:30 - 5:00 p.m. 6:30 - 7:15 p.m. 7:30 - 9:00 p.m. 8:30 a.m. - 12:00 noon 12:30 - 1:15 p.m. 1:15 - 1:45 p.m. 1:45 - 2:00 p.m. Student Shadowing Board Members only. Historic reenactment - Costumes. Meet at Extension Office first. Board of Supervisors meeting. All participants meet in lobby of Public Meeting room - Police Administration building. Reception - Public Meeting Room Lobby. Police Administration building. School Board meeting, Public Meeting Room Students "Shadow" Government or School Officials Luncheon for ALL Participants (King's Korner, Lower Level, County Airport) Question and answer session with a judge from Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. Chesterfield County Airport Restaurant Banquet Room Presentation of Certificates of Participation to students and teachers Chesterfield County Airport Restaurant Banquet Room 003 At this time we would like to proceed with recognition of former board members. I will call each of them individually to come forward at this time and ask them to remain up front until everyone has been called and recognized. here today can let us know if that is true. While our board meetings are not nearly as exciting these days, we know that boards are just as passionate about Chesterfield County now as past boards were in those days. It is because of this kind of passion and commitment that we are able to celebrate 250 years of success and progress. We would like to recognize our past board members and present a momento of the county's 250th anniversary as a token of appreciation for their service and leadership. This momento is a marble timepiece with the 250t~ logo inscribed on the top. Today is a special time in the history of our county and we hope that this clock brings back fond memories of today and encourage good thoughts as we begin a new era in the history of our County. (Ask Marilyn to come forward to announce former board members) As we prepared for this very special recognition of our former Board members, We did some research to try to fred some specific incidents relating to the more human side of serving as elected officials. We are probably fortunate that those experiences are not recorded in the official records of the county. We did however turn up one rumer, we could not verify this fact: We know that our boards have been known for their aggressive pursuit of issues impacting the county. We know that they were very passionate about their representation and that they vigorously defended their issues. We understand that at one meeting the discussion was so passionate and things became so heated that a fight actually took place among board members. As a result of that meeting the board members chairs had to be nailed to the floor so that they could not be used as weapons at future meetings. We cannot verify this story and maybe some of the past members As a token of appreciation for your service to the community, we have a gift that we would like to present to each of you for your leadership and devotion to the citizens of Chesterfield County. We hope that this token of our 250th anniversary will always be a reminder of the county's history and a proud symbol of its furore. (Clerk to deliver gift to board members--gifts are opened by board members). RECOGNIZING FORMER BOARD MEMBERS MAY 25, 1999 Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board, today is an important day in the history of our county. Chesterfield has a rich history. We are the award winning community that we are today because we have had some strong leaders to guide us. In honor of the County's 250t~ birthday, we are paying tribute to some special people who had a hand in making our county what it is today. We are fortunate to have with us this afiemoon former board members and families of deceased board members for the past three decades. But before we make the presentation to past Board Members, we would like to take a moment to recognize the current Board for your contributions. The accomplishments are numerous and under your leadership the county has continued to be elevated as one of the premiere communities in the nation. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of I Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 5 .A- Subject: Presentation of Resolution from the 1999 General Assembly Commending Chesterfield County on Its 250th Anniversary County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: None Summary of Information: The 1999 General Assembly passed the attached resolution (SJ 467) commending Chesterfield on its 250th anniversary. Members of the County's legislative delegation are here to present the resolution to the Board of Supervisors. Preparer: Title: Director, Intergovernmental Relations Attachments: Yes -]No # 004 ' Bill Trdcking - 1999 session ,--,, http://legl.st0,~va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?99 l+ful+SJ467ER summary I pd.f SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 467 Commending Chesterfield County on the occasion of its 250th anniversary. Agreed to by the Senate, January 28, 1999 Agreed to by the House of Delegates, February 5, 1999 WHEREAS, the General Assembly (then the House of Burgesses) meeting in Williamsburg in 1749, during the reign of George II, provided for the creation of the County of Chesterfield; and WHEREAS, Chesterfield County was named in honor of Philip Dormer Stanhope, fourth Earl of Chesterfield; and WHEREAS, in 1607, Sir Christopher Newport explored the James and Appomattox Rivers in Chesterfield five days before the founding of the Jamestown settlement; and WHEREAS, in 1611, the Citie of Henficus was established as the second permanent English settlement in the New World; and WHEREAS, in 1614, in Chesterfield County, Bermuda Hundred was the first incorporated town in America; and WHEREAS, in 1619, in Chesterfield County, Falling Creek was the site of the first iron furnace in the New World; and WHEREAS, in 1622, Mount Maladay, near Dutch Gap, was the site of the first American hospital; and WHEREAS, in 1709, Chesterfield County produced the first commercially mined coal in America; in 1807, the first paved road in Virginia was the Midlothian Turnpike; and in 1831, the Midlothian to Manchester Railroad was the first in Virginia; and WHEREAS, in 1921, three Chesterfield County women from Drewry's Bluff originated Father's Day; and WHEREAS, the County of Chesterfield has continued to grow and prosper, and the modem Chesterfield County, in its 250th year, is proud of its past and confident of its future as it approaches its third century; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED by the Senate, the House of Delegates concurring, That the General Assembly congratulate the County of Chesterfield on the occasion of its 250th anniversary; and, be it RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Clerk of the Senate prepare a copy of this resolution for presentation to the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors in honor of the 250th anniversary of this historic, vibrant, and beautiful county. Go to (General Assembly Home) 1 of 1 05/07/99 10:28:04 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 5.B. Subject: Recognizing Former Board of Supervisor Members for Their Service to Chesterfield County County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: As part of Chesterfield County's 250th Anniversary Celebration, former board members are being recognized for their service to the citizens of Chesterfield County. We are pleased that former board members and family of deceased board members are present to share in this important milestone in the history of Chesterfield County. Prepar~ Title: Assistant County Administrator Attachments: Yes No # (~06 Meeting Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA May 25, 1999 Item Number: Page ~___ of_~_~ Subject: Recognition of Lieutenant Roland D. Stokes, Jr. Upon His Retirement After 25 Years of Dedicated Service to Chesterfield County Count}~ Administrator's Comments,,! CountyAdministrator: BoardAction Requested: Adoption of attached resolution. Summary oflnformation:, Preparer: ~a~~~ ~]~ Steve A. Elswick Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Title: Chief of Department RECOGNIZING LIEUTENANT ROLAND D. STOKES, JR. UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Lieutenant Roland D. Stokes, Jr. began his public service with the County as a firefighter in the Fire Department on August 1~ 1973, and has faithfully served Chesterfield County for twenty-five years; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stokes was the first African-American hired by the Fire Department; and WHEREAS, by providing quality public service, Lieutenant Stokes has symbolized the type of employee Chesterfield County seeks~ and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stokes' desire to do a good job has been a primary factor that has permitted him to perform at a high level while always striving for excellence; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stokes displayed a caring attitude toward all of his customers, often going out of his way to help those in need, and demonstrated excellent teamwork skills by always being available to assist his co-workers, volunteers and the citizens of Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stokes was assigned to ensure that by County Ordinance, all motels/hotels and apartment units were brought into compliance; thereby providing a smoke detector in each unit to serve as early warnings for our citizens and customers; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stokes was trained and recognized as the Fire Department's Inspector for all blasting permits, a delegation by the Commonwealth of Virginia which allowed this locality to enforce accepted procedures; and WHEREAS, Lieutenant Stokes has been effective in working with all groups, including being an active member of the Department's Human Relations Committee since 1993. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes the contributions of Lieutenant Roland D. Stokes, Jr., and expresses the appreciation of all residents for his service to the County, along with their congratulations and best wishes for a long and happy retirement. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Lieutenant Stokes and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 5, D. Subject: Resolution Recognizing E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Inc. For Their Continued Financial Support of the Annual Winter Lecture Series Sponsored by Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve a resolution to recognize E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Inc. for their continued financial support of the annual Winter Lecture Series sponsored by the Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department. Summary_ of Information: E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Inc. has graciously donated up.to $15,000 for each of the past twelve years for the Winter Lecture Series allowing the Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department to provide a wholesome, family activity. This series of five free lectures offers a variety of topics from local, national and international speakers that entertain, educate and motivate the audience. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Inc. is an excellent example of how a business can participate in promoting interesting educational family oriented events for the citizens of Chesterfield County. Preparer: !~_~---'-- Title: Michael S. Golden Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: Yes [~ No OO9 RESOLUTION WltEREAS, Chesterfield County and Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation Department recognizes E. I. DuPont De Nemours &Cornpany, Inc. for their continued financial support towards the annual Winter Lecture Series; and, WHEREAS, their donations have made the Winter Lecture Series possible for the past twelve years; and, WHEREAS, E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Inc., which in Chesterfield County employs 2,400 people and reaches a worldwide market, has given back to the community through continued sponsorship of an annual county special event; and, WHEREAS, through the cooperative efforts of Mr. Bob Dunn, Environmental Affairs Manager, the spirit of community/private partnership continues to provide the county with the ability to afford a varied selection of high caliber speakers for area residents to enjoy each year; and, WHEREAS, Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation greatly appreciates this financial support and is looking forward to a continued strong rapport with E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Inc. THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors publicly recognize E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company, Inc. for their generous support of the Winter Lecture Series. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 5. E. Subject: Resolution Recognizing .Mr. William Ayres For His service to the Camp Baker Management Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Camp Baker Management Board has requested that the Board of Supervisors recognize and commend Mr. William Ayres for his service to Chesterfield County through his work on the Camp Baker Management Board. Summary of Information: The Camp Baker Management Board recommends that Mr. William Ayres be recognized by the Board of Supervisors for his efforts to the Camp Baker Management Board. During his tenure, many improvements have been made to the site, including the newly constructed kitchen/dining facility. Michael S. Goldenff Title: Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: Yes [-'-J No 011 RECOGNIZING MR. WILLIAM AYRES FOR HIS SERVICE ON THE CAMP BAKER MANAGEMENT BOARD WHEREAS, community service is among the greatest traditions of Chesterfield County residents; and WHEREAS, the membership of Mr. William Ayres on the Camp Baker Management Board from 1996 to 1999 has been held in high regard; and WHEREAS, Mr. Ayres has demonstrated involvement in many of Camp Baker's efforts including the ongoing capital renovation of its facilities; and WHEREAS, the contributions of Mr. Ayres have contributed to increased participation in the programs of Camp Baker; and WHEREAS, the ongoing support of Mr. Ayres has resulted in the upcoming conversion of the Camp Baker ranger house to an overnight respite facility. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors publicly recognizes and commends Mr. William Ayres for his devoted service to Chesterfield County and the Camp Baker Management Board. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be presented to Mr. Ayres and that this resolution be permanently recorded among the papers of this Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia. 012 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 5.F. Subject: Recognizing Baxter Michael Gilley, Troop 923, Sponsored by First United Methodist Church; Peter Graham Moody, Troop 819, Sponsored by Saint John's Episcopal Church; Christopher Barton Osterhout and Jason Douglas Reed, both of Troop 806, Sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church; Scott Michael Campbell and Nathan Thomas Tatum, both of Troop 897, Sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church Upon Attaining Rank of Eagle Scout County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: _~.__ Board Action Requested: Adoption of attached resolutions. Summary of Information: Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt resolutions recognizing Mr. Gilley, Troop 923; Mr. Moody, Troop 819; Mr. Osterhout and Mr. Reed, both of Troop 806; and Mr. Campbell and Mr. Tatum, both of Troop 897 upon attaining rank of Eagle Scout. Ail will be present at the meeting, accompanied by members of their family, to accept the resolutions. Bermuda District Peter Moody Parents: Arthur & Amanda Matoaca District Christopher Osterhout Parents: Dave & Liz Baxter Gilley Parents: Baxter & Susie Jason Reed Parents: Doug & Sherry Midlothian District Scott Campbell Parents: Jim & Linda Nathan Tatum Parents: Sherrod & Terry Preparer: ~~-¢.-~ Lisa H. Elko Title: Clerk to the Board Attachments: Yes No WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Scott Michael Campbell, Troop 897, sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his Country, Scott is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Scott Michael Campbell and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was citizenship training, personal development, individuals; and founded to promote and fitness of WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Nathan Thomas Tatum, Troop 897, sponsored by Mount Pisgah United Methodist Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his Country, Nathan is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Nathan Thomas Tatum and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Baxter Michael Gilley, Troop 923, sponsored by First United Methodist Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his Country, Michael is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Baxter Michael Gilley and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. 016 WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was citizenship training, personal development, individuals; and founded to promote and fitness of WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Peter Graham Moody, Troop 819, sponsored by Saint John's Episcopal Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his Country, Peter is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Peter Graham Moody and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Christopher Barton Osterhout, Troop 806, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his Country, Christopher is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Christopher Barton Osterhout and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr. William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of individuals; and WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community, being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living up to the Scout Oath and Law, Mr. Jason Douglas Reed, Troop 806, sponsored by Woodlake United Methodist Church, has accomplished those high standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those individuals entering the Scouting movement; and WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the great accomplishments of his Country, Jason is indeed a member of a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be very proud. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr. Jason Douglas Reed and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens. Meeting Date: 5/25/99 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page. 1 of 1 Item Number: e Subject: Work Session to Discuss Outdoor Advertising (Billboards) County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary_ of Information: Staff will discuss the current ordinance requiring the removal o£billboards in County by July 22, 1999 and the history behind the adoption of the billboard amortization ordinance. Preparer: , /--~-e~ Title: County Attorney Steven L. Micas 0518:44869.1 Attachments: EYes 1No 1# BILLBOARD ORDINANCE OPTIONS CURRENT LOCATION OF BILLBOARDS !~ !:;:0""~.:,.~.~:;:.'"'"":"';:============================ NON-FEDERAL AID HIGHWAYS .................................................................................................. i~- ......................... Il' Ill .............. II/Ill'Ii'Iii .............................................. ROUTE 10 EAST OF 1-95 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHVCAY JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY MIDLOTHIAN TURNPIKE FEDERAL AID HIGHWAYS ROUTE 60 WEST OF POWHITE CHIPPENHAM PARKWAY 1-95 Location of Billboards in County · Non-Federal Aid Highways - Route 10 (west of 1-95) 3 - Route 60 (east of Powhite) 12 - Jefferson Davis Highway 33 - River Road 2 - Genito Road 1 - Ruthers Road 1 - Turner Road 2 - Willis Road 1 Sub-total 55 6 Location of Billboards in County Federal Aid Highway - Route 10 (east of 1-95) 11 - Route 60 (west of Powhite) 10 - Route 360 (all) 28 - Interstate 95 (all) 18 - Chippenham Parkway 5 Sub-total 72 N AREAS WHERE BILLBOARDS ARE PROHIBITED Note: The area lying between Parker Lane and I-9~ has a prohibition on billboards for property zoned after April 12, 1989. Billboards would be permitted in this area for properties properly zoned prior to April 12, 1989. Richmond CHRONOLOGY Jan 28 Jun 16 Jul 22 Jul 21 Dec May 27 Jul 22 1987 1992 1992 1993 1994 1998 1999 ccPc Henrico Board Of NaUonal Suit is Henrico All prohibits new Supervisors advertising Dismissed County billboards County billboards in adopts company repeals on adopts certain areas of amortization ordinance files its non-federal the containing a 7 suit against · amortization aid highway~ ordinance County containing a year Chesterfield ordinance in 12 year amortization County Chesterfield amortization period for must be period for billboards removed billboards OPTIONS A. Enforce Existing Ordinance Requiring Removal B. Delay Effective Date of Ordinance C. Repeal Existing Ordinances CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page lo f3 Meetin~ Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 7.A. Subject: FY00 through FY05 Secondary Road Six-Year Improvement Plan, FY00 Secondary Road Improvement Budget, FY00 Chesterfield Road Fund, FY99 Supplemental Chesterfield Road Fund, FY00 through FY05 Chesterfield Road Fund and Surface Transportation Program Fund Project Development Schedules, and Appropriation/Transfer of Funds County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to approve the FY00 through FY05 Secondary Road Six-Year Improvement Plan, the FY00 Secondary Road Improvement Budget, the FY00 Chesterfield Road Fund, the FY99 Supplemental Chesterfield Road Fund, the FY00 through FY05 Chesterfield Road Fund and Surface Transportation Program Fund Project Development Schedules, and appropriate/transfer funds. Summary_ of Information: The Board conducted a public hearing on April 28, 1999, to consider the Secondary Road Six-Year Plan, Secondary Road Budget, Chesterfield Road Fund, and STP Project Development Schedules. The Board deferred action on the items and requested staffto modify the proposed Six-Year Plan. Methods for accomplishing the changes requested by the Board are listed on Attachment A. A summary of the original proposed plan is shown on Attachments B and C. (Continued next page) Preparer: ~/~fffq~.~'~ Title: ~.J.- McCracken Agen 396 Attachments: Yes [-~ No Director of Transportation O Ol CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: 1. Adopt the attached resolutions approving the amended FY00 through FY05 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan, the amended FY00 Secondary Road Improvement Budget, the amended FY00 Chesterfield Road Fund, and FY99 Supplemental Chesterfield Road Fund. 2. Approve the amended FY00 through FY05 Chesterfield Road Fund Project Development Schedule, and the FY00 through FY05 Surface Transportation Program Fund Project Development Schedule. 3. Transfer $50,000 from the General Road Improvement Account for the Salem Church Road FY99 Supplemental Chesterfield Road Fund. 4. Appropriate $366,000 from "Road Cash Proffers (Shed 2)" to the Old Buckingham Road Project to initiate preliminary engineering. 5. Authorize the County Administrator to enter into the customary VDOT/County/consultant/contractor, design, right-of-way acquisition, and/or construction agreements, acceptable to the County Attorney, for the projects. District: Countywide CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meetino Date: Mav 25. 1999 Number Bud,qet and Manaqement Comments' This item requests adoption of the FY2000-2005 six year road plan which identifies improvements anticipated to be made to the secondary road system in the County. A public hearing was held on April 28, 1999 and requested changes have been incorporated. The plan has been developed assuming an allocation of $11.3 million, which includes a $1.0 million Chesterfield Road Fund Program. Under this program the County provides $500,000 to be matched on a dollar-for-dollar basis by VDOT. The FY2000-2004 Adopted Capital Improvement Program includes $500,000 per year for this program. The road projects identified for the $500,000 County match in FY2000 are Nash Road ($378,765) and Salem Church Road ($121,235) . Also requested is a $50,000 transfer from the General Road Improvement Account to fund the FY99 Supplemental road match. The current available balance in the General Road Improvements Account is $750,281; transfer of $50,000 for the Salem Church Road supplemental match, coupled with other transfers planned from this account, specifically-- transfer of $33,104 for a public transportation study and $350,000 to award the Jury Drive construction bid, will leave an available balance of $317,177. The Board is also being requested to appropriate $366,000 in developer cash proffers for the preliminary engineering of Old Buckingham Road. Cash proffers collected and available to appropriate in this traffic shed (shed 2) are $402,959. Preparer: ~~~-~/~,~/~ Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Mana,qement 023 WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) have conducted a public hearing on the FY00 through FY05 Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board concurs with the proposed projects identified in the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approves the Six Year Secondary Road Improvement Plan as amended. May 25, 1999 Agen396 oa4 WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has submitted its proposed FY00 Secondary Road Improvement Budget to the County; and WHEREAS, the Budget represents the implementation of the first year of the Six Year Improvement Plan adopted by the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approves the FY00 Secondary Road Improvement Budget as amended. May 25, 1999 Agen396 WHEREAS, Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginia permits the Commonwealth Transportation Board to make an equivalent matching allocation to any County for designations by the governing body of up to 25% or $500,000, whichever is greater, of funds received by it during the current fiscal year pursuant to the "State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972" for use by the Commonwealth Transportation Board to construct, maintain, or improve primary and secondary highway systems within such County; and WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors has appropriated $500,000 for the Chesterfield Road Fund with the adoption of the FY00 Appropriation Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has notified the County that $500,000 is the maximum amount of Chesterfield County funds that will be matched by the State during FY00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors has appropriated $500,000 to be matched by the State for the FY00 Chesterfield Road Fund (Revenue Sharing Program); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the matched funds be allocated to the following projects: $757,530 Nash Road from Morrisett Road to Woodpecker Road Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way and Construction ($378,765 VDOT and $378,765 County) $242,470 Salem Church Road from Kingsland Road to Beulah Road Preliminary Engineering, Right-of-Way and Construction ($121,235 VDOT and $121,235 County) May25,1999 Agen396 026 WHEREAS, Section 33.1-75.1 of the Code of Virginia permits the Commonwealth Transportation Board to make an equivalent matching allocation to any County for designations by the governing body of up to 25% or $500,000, whichever is greater, of funds received by it during the current fiscal year pursuant to the "State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972" for use by the Commonwealth Transportation Board to construct, maintain, or improve primary and secondary highway systems within such County; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has notified the County that $50,000 is the maximum amount of Chesterfield County funds that will be matched by the State as a supplemental FY99 allocation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors has allocated $50,000 from the General Road Improvement Account for the FY99 Supplemental Allocation Program and requests VDOT to provide an equivalent match. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the FY99 supplemental matched funds be allocated for the following project: $100,000 Salem Church Road from Kingsland Road to Beulah Road ($50,000 VDOT, $50,000 County) May 25, 1999 Agen396 02.7 RECOMMENDED PLAN REVISIONS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' REQUEST PLAN AMENDMENT CLOVER HILL DISTRICT Pave Streets in Surreywood MATOACA DISTRICT Pave Rhodes Lane Sooner Add Genito Rd./Woolridge Rd. Turn Lanes Add Woodlake Village Pky/Village Square Pky Turn Lanes Re-designate Chesterfield Rd. Fund FY02 Clover Hill District Allocation ($200,000) previously designated for Genito Rd. (360-Fox Chase), to pave streets in Surreywood if VDOT does not pave streets sooner. Construction date for Genito will not be delayed. Delay Wild Turkey Run from FY00 to FY03, transfer $100,000 to Rhodes Lane. Delay Spring Run Rd. curves from FY01 to FY05, transfer $1,400,000 to Rhodes Lane. Transfer will allow Rhodes Lane to be paved in FY03 instead of beyond the plan. Re-designate Chesterfield Road Fund FY04 and FY05 Matoaca District Allocation ($1 Million) previously designated for Rhodes Lane to Spring Run curves. Transfer $500,000 from Nash Rd. (Beach Rd. to Morrisett Rd.) since the construction bid was lower than the estimate; turn lanes to be constructed in FY01. Transfer will not delay Nash Rd. Transfer $30,000 from Nash Rd. (Beach Rd. to Morrisett Rd.) to begin design; turn lanes constructed in FY07. Transfer will not delay Nash Rd. Add paving Second Branch Rd. south of Add Second Branch Rd. to the plan; construction expected by River Rd. FY09. Millside Public Rd. Access Study County meet with landowners to discuss donating land for public road. MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT Move up Improvements to Old Buckingham Rd. Appropriate $366,000 from road cash proffers (Shed 2) for preliminary engineering studies to determine scope of improvements. County apply for safety funds in FY01, if unsuccessful in obtaining safety funds delete Buford/Rockaway turn lanes. Re- designate Chesterfield Rd. fund FY03 and FY04 Midlothian District $1 Million allocation for Old Buckingham in lieu of Buford/Rockaway turn lanes. ATTACHMENT A NOR~ PROPOSED SECONDARY ROAD SiX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN FY O0 THROUGH FY 05 1,0 0.4 OLD BON AIR RD BUFORD RD/ROCKAWAY RD sP-o5 SU-O3 3.7 ~yond OLD BUCKINGHAM' RD ROBIOUS RD 1.8 o.5 SMOKETREE DR/ F-99 GORDON SCHOOL 8,0 BWon~ OLD HUNDRED'RD 13,2 F-00 GENITO RD 0,4 su-99 OLD HUNDRED RD 0.7 ~wno WOOLRIDGE F-Ol BAILEY BRIDGE RD s~-oo COAL~ORO'-RD F~ SPRING 0.3 s~4 RIVERWAY RD "" 0.3 SU-04 HENSLEY 1,8 $U-00 QUALLA RD RD o.~ WILDTURKEY RUN SP-O0 7.0 ~o-o4 NASH RD 1.5 Bey~d RHODES LA ~ PROJECT WITHIN 6 YEAR PLAN · · · PROJECT BEYOND 6 YEAR PLAN 1.1 FOREST HILL AVE/BUFORD RD sP-oo 5.6 & 9.0 COURTHOUSE RD uc REAMS RD 0.4 F-o4 WALMSLEY BLVD 0.9 Complete NEWBYS BRIDGE RD 3.7 5.1 F-02 F-03 KINGSLAND RD 1.0 Beyond DUNDAS RD ~.o BEULAH RD 2.7 Beyond 2.7 SALEM CHURCH RD sp-o2 HOPKINS RD 2.8 / ~ ! I 1.1 CENTRE ST sP-oO ' MAROBRITH RD F0-~ 0.1 LINDBERG DR 0,5 LAKEVIEW RD sp-04 .. ~K~IEW RD 0.3 . ~2 3.9 B~NDERS BRIDGE RD ~-oa LEGEND Co~t in Cstmillions of $ [ ] Multi Jurisdictional ruction Year W - Winter Sp - Spflng Su - Summer F - Fall UC- UNDER C0NSTRUCTION I ATTACHMENT B J PROPOSED SECONDARY ROAD SIX yEAR PROJECTS FY 00 THROUGH FY 05 BY MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT/ PROJECT FROM TO DESCRIPTION ANTICIPATED START CONSTRUCTION BERMUDA LINDSERG DR HARROWGATE RD DEAD END PAVE GRAVEL RD CENTRE ST RTE 10 0.1 MI. N. RTE t0 NEW2 LANE DUNDAS RD STRATHMORE RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES MAROBRITH RD HAPPY HILL RD DEAD END PAVE GRAVEL RD BRANDERS BRIDGE RD RTE t 0 HAPPY HILL RD WIDEN 2 LANE CLOVER HILL ** COURTHOUSE RD EDENBERRY DR LUCKS LA WIDEN 4&6 LANE ** COURTHOUSE RD GENITO RD RTE 390 WIDEN 4 LANE GENITO RD WARBRO RD INTERSECTION DRAINAGE PIPE OLD HUNDRED RD MILLRIDGE PKY E BOUNDARY RD SHOULDERS WALMSLEY BLVD HOLRIDGE ST INTERSECTION TURN LANES WALMSLEY BLVD NEWBY'S BRIDGE INTERSECTION TURN LANES SMOKETREE DR GORDON SCHOOL RD YARROW LA SIDEWALK~BIKE LA GORDON SCHOOL RD SPIREA RD SMOKETREE DR SIDL=WALK GENITO RD RTE 360 SOUTH RIDGE DR WIDEN 4 LANE GENITO RD SOUTH RIDGE DR FOX CHASE LA WIDEN 4 LANE NEWBYS BRIDGE RD WALMSLEY BLVD FALLING CREEK BR WIDEN 2 LANE ** REAMS RD ADKINS RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES DALE WALMSLEY BLVD TURNER RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES COURTHOUSE RD GENITO RD RTE 360 WIDEN 4 LANE COURTHOUSE RD RTE 288 GENITO RD WIDEN 4 LANE HOPKINS RD INCA DR LAUREL OAK RD WIDEN 2 LANE LORI ROAD RELOCATED RTE t{) JURY DR NEW 2 LANE SALEM CHURCH RD KINGSLAND RD BEULAH RD WIDEN 2 LANE SALEM CHURCH RD CENTRALIA RD INTERSECTION TURN LANE NEWBYS BRIDGE RD FALUNG CREEK HAGOOD LA WIDEN 2 LANE SALEM CHURCH RD HUNTINGCREEK DR INTERSECTION TURN LANES KINGSLAND RD REEDY CREEK DRAINAGE IMPR BEULAH RD SALEM CHURCH RD HOPKINS RD WIDEN 2 LANE MATOACA COURTHOUSE RD RTE 298 GENITO RD WIDEN 4 LANE GENITO RD COURTHOUSE RD RTE 360 WIDEN 4 LANE NASH RD BEACH RD MORRISETT RD NEW 2 LANE COALBORO RD 0.6MI. S. WlNTERPOCK RIVER RD PAVE GRAVEL RD WILD TURKEY RUN SADDLEBROOK RD DEAD END PAVE GRAVEL RD NEWBYS BRIDGE RD QUALLA RD 0.5 MI. E. QUALLA RD WIDEN 2 LANE SPRING RUN RD MCENNALLY RD BAILEY BRIDGE RD CURVES BAILEY BRIDGE RD CLAYPOINT RD MANCHESTER H.S. WIDEN 2 LANE LAKEVIEW RD WOODPECKER RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES LAKEVIEW RD BRANDERS BRIDGE RD INTERSECTION TURN LANE RIVERWAY RD BEACH RD INTERSECTION REALIGNMENT NASH RD MORRISETi' RD HIGHLAND GLEN DR WIDEN 2 LANE HENSLEY RD SPRING RUN RD INTERSECTION REALIGNMENT BAILEY BRIDGE RD MANCHESTER H.S. SPRING RUN RD WIDEN 2 LANE RHODES LANE 0.SMI S WOODPECKER 0.SMI W SANDYFORD PAVE GRAVEL RD QUALLA RD COURTHOUSE RD RTE 233 WIDEN 2 LANE QUALLA RD CLAYPOINT RD SPRING RUN RD WIDEN 2 LANE OLD HUNDRED RD OTTERDALE RD DRY BRIDGE RD WIDEN 2 LANE QUALLA RD SPRING RUN RD BEACH RD WIDEN 2 LANE WOOLRIDGE RD TIMBER BLUFF PKY RESERVOIR WIDEN 2 LANE MIDLOTHIAN COURTHOUSE RD RTE 60 EDENBERRY DR WIDEN 9 LANE ~ COURTHOUSE RD EDENBERRY DR LUCKS LA WIDEN 4&9 LANE ROBIOUS RD HUGUENOT RD SALISBURY RD WIDEN 4 LANE ROBIOUS RD RTE 60 WOODMONT DR WIDEN 4 LANE FOREST HILL AVE BUFORD RD INTERSECTION SIDEWALK FOREST HILL AVE BUFORD RD INTERSECTION STREET LIGHT * OLD BON AIR ROAD IRON MILL RD WATERS MILL RD WIDEN 2 LANE ** REAMS RD ADKINS RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES ROBIOUS RD JAMES RIVER RD COUNTY LINE WIDEN 2 LANE BUFORD RD ROCKAWAY RD INTERSECTION TURN LANES * OLD BUCKINGHAM RD RTE 60 ALVERSER DR WIDEN 2 LANE * NEW PROJECT "PROJECT IN MORE THAN ONE DISTRICT magdist2 3-24-99 SUMMER 1999 SPRING 2000 SUMMER 2000 FALL 2003 SPRING 2004 UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION SUMMER 1999 SUMMER t999 SUMMER 1999 FALL 1999 FALL t999 FALL ~999 FALL 2000 FALL 2002 FALL 2004 COMPLETE UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION SUMMER 1999 SPRING 2002 FALL 2002 FALL 2003 FALL 2005 SPRING 2008 SPRING 2008 UNDER CONSTRUCTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION SPRING 1999 SPRING 2000 SPRING 2OO0 SUMMER 20OO FALL 2001 FALL 2001 SPRING 2002 SPRING 2OO4 SPRING 2OO4 SPRING 2004 FALL 2004 SUMMER 2005 SPRING 2006 SPRING 2006 SUMMER 2006 SPRING 2OO8 FALL 2009 SPRING 2010 COMPLETE UNDER CONSTRUCTION SPRING 2000 SPRING 2000 SPRING 2OOO SPRING 2000 SUMMER 2003 FALL 2004 SPRING 2005 SPRING 2005 SUMMER 2007 IATFACHMENTC I 0,30 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 7. B. Subject: Board Action on Zoning and Utilities Ordinance Amendments Relating to the use of Public Water and Wastewater Facilities in The Route :288 Corridor Plan ~rea County_ Administrator's Comments: County_ Administrator; Board Action Requested; The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the attached Zoning Ordinance amendments. Summary_ of information: On April 14, 1999, the Board of Supervisors held a public heating on the attached Zoning and Utilities Ordinance amendments and there was no opposition. The Planning Commission recommended these amendments and additions to the County's Zoning and Utilities Ordinances to the Board of Supervisors on February 16, 1999. These amendments and additions will require the use of public water and wastewater facilities for development zoned alter the adoption of this ordinance. At the April 28 Board meeting, the Board of Supervisors deferred consideration of this amendment for sixty days to the June 23, 1999 meeting. Preparer: Thomas E. Jao~n Attachments: Yes ~No Title: Director of Planning D:DATA/AGENDA/BOS/1999/MAY2599.2/GOK 031 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: Summary_ of Information: (Continued) Exemptions to this change include: · Temporary manufactured or mobile homes; · Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after the effective date of the Ordinances; · Structures authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that are granted after the effective date if the use is incidental to a primary use previously allowed with a private well or septic system. · Governmental structures or institutional buildings; · Residences located on lots exempt from the subdivision ordinance. · Homes on lots over one acre and located in the lowest density land use category in the P10~n are exempt ~om the wastewater provisions of this ordinance, but are required to hook up to public water. Attachments: · Proposed Ordinance amendment AN ORDD,~ANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 17-91, 18-63 AND 18-64, RELATING TO WATER AND WASTEWATEK CONNECTIONS IN THE ROUTE 288 CORRIDOR PLAN AREA BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County.: (1) That Sections 17-91, 18-63 and 18-64 of the Code of the CounW of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, are amended and reenacted to read as follows: Sec. 17-91. Size of lots served by conventional septic systems. (a) In any subdivision utilizing conventional septic systems the average lot size shall be no less than 40,000 square feet, at least 90 percent of all lots in the subdivision shall be at least 40,000 square feet in size, and no lot shall be less than 30,000 square feet in size. In addition, all lots in the subdivision shall have a minimum lot width of 120 feet measured at the building line. This subsection shall apply to any property, for which residential zoning is obtained after February 23, 1989; however, this subsection shall apply to every residential lot which is recorded after Ianuary 1, 1991. (b) No subdivision ofland within the Southern and Western Plan Area for which residential zoning is obtained after -'--.,~ ~,~,v~-'~- -~'---~,,~ ~ ....~.~'~'-',,,,~ ......... ~,~-.~,.,,~,,,'- [$une 23, 1993] may utilize conventional septic systems unless ali lots in such subdivision are at least one acre in size and located in those areas designated in the counrfs comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category. (Areas colored tan on the Southern and Western Area Land Use Plan.) L~ No subdivision of land within the Route 288 Corridor Plan Area for which residential zoning is obtained after (efFective date} may utilize conventional se.~tic systems unless all lots in such subdivision are at least one acre in size and located in those areas designated in the county's comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest densiBr_ category_. (Areas colored tan on the Route 288 Corridor Plan area). (Code 1978, § 18.1-55) ooo Sec. 18-63. Mandatory water connections in certain areas. ooo (b) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Southern and Western 1014:23333.1 1 12/9/98 4:40 PM Area Plan described in the subdivision ordinance and which received zoning approval after June 23, 1993 shall connect to the water system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the water system is otherwise required by law: (1) Temporary. manufactured or mobile homes ~; (2) Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after June 23, 1993; (3) Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after June 23, 1993 if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a private well; (4) Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and (5) Residences-that are located on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. ~ All structures which are located on property_ that is included in the Route 288 Corridor Plan Area as shown in comprehensive plan_ and which received zoning approval after (adoption date here'~ shall connect to the water system. However. the following structures shall not be req~lired to connect unless connection to the water system is otherwise reouired by law: (1) Temoorarv manufactured or mobile homes: Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed after (ado.mion date heret: ~ Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or snecial excentions that were c, ranted after (adoption date heret if the use that is nermitted by the conditional use or soecial exceotion is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a orivate well: (4) Governmental structures and institutional buildings: and ~ Residences that are located on lots that are exempt from the rec~uirements of the ~ubdivision ordinance. (eli) For purposes of this section "structure" and "institutional building" shall have the same meaning as in the zoning ordinance. (d~l) The planning commission may grant exceptions to subsections (b) ~ during schematic plan, site plan or tentative subdivision review. The Planning Commission may also ~ant exceptions to subsections (bi and (c) to an applicant who files an application with the plarming department on a form prescribed by the director ofvlanning and who vavs a fee of $260.00 to the r~lanning department, if the applicant is not sub_iect to the schematic, site plan or subdivision review process, if ti'he planning commission shall finds that: (1) The use ora private well will not adversely affect the ability to extend public ~vater to other property; (2) The use of a private well will not encourage future development that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) The use ora private well is not reasonably likely to adversely ~ect the public health, safety or welfare. The planning commission may impose conditions to mitigate the impact of any exception that it grants. 1014:23333.1 2 12/9/98 4:40 PM 034 (Code 1978, § 20-43) Sec. 18-64. Mandatory. wastewater connection in certain areas. (a) All structures which are located on property that is included in the Southern and Western Area Plan described in the subdivision ordinance and which received zoning approval after June 23, 1993 shall connect to the wastewater system. However, the following structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the wastewater system is otherwise required by law: (1) Single-family dwellings on lots which axe at least one acre in size and which are located in areas that are designated in the comprehensive plan for single-family residential use in the lowest density category (areas colored tan on the Southern and Western Area Land Use Plan); (2) Temporary manufactured or Mlllobile homes; (3) Structures that were authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions which were renewed al~er June 23, 1993; (4) Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or special exceptions that were granted after June 23, 1993 if the use that is permitted by the conditional use or special exception is incidental to a principal use that was previously allowed with a septic system; (5) Governmental structures and institutional buildings; and (6) Residences that are Iocated on lots that are exempt from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. ~ ~I structures which are located on nrot~ertv that is included in the Route.2$8 Corridor Plan Area as shown in the comnrehensive ~lan. and which received zonimz annroval at~er (.adoption date here~ shall connect to the wastewater system. Flowever. the followin~ structures shall not be required to connect unless connection to the wastewater system is otherwise required by law: (1) Single-family dwellings on lots which are at least one acre in size and which are located i~ areas that are desi~ated in the comprehensive plan for sinCe-family r~idential use in the lowest densi .t3r categor3r_ (areas colored tan on the Route 288 Corridor Plan areal Ttnnt~orarv manufactured or mobile homes: Structures that were authorized bv conditional uses or spcsl exceptions which wt~ reneweO after (adoption date here~}: Structures that are authorized by conditional uses or speeia! exceptions that were _re, anted al~er (adomion date betel if the use that is pcrtnitt~! by the conditional use or snecial exception is incidental to a principal use that was .~reriouslv allowed with a s _e~tic _s3r~tem: (5) Gbvernmental structures and institutional buildings: and R~idencea that are located on lots that are exempt from the reauirements of the subdivision ordinance. For purposes of this section, "structure," "single-family dwelling" and "institutional 1014:23333.1 3 12/9/98 4:40 PM building" shall have the same meaning as in the zoning ordinance. (e~[) The Planning Commission may also grant exceptions to subsections (bi and (c) to an applicant who flies an application with the planning department on a form prescribed by the director of planning and who pays a fee of $260.00 to the planning department, if the applicant is not su~ect to the sch¢lXl~tic, site plan or subdivision review process, he*Xhe planning commission shall finds that: (1) The use of a septic system will not adversely affect the abitity to extend public sewer to other property; (2) The use cfa septic system will not encourage future development that is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan; and (3) The use cfa septic system is not reasonably likely to adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare. The planning commission may impose conditions to mitigate the impacts of any exception that it grants. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. I014:23333.! 4 12/9/98 4:40 PM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY  BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: ?.¢. Subiect: Board Action on The Route 288 Corridor Plan County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of The Route 288 Corridor Plan. Summary of information: On April 14, 1999, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on The Route 288 Corridor Plan. The Planning Commission, on a 3-1-1 vote, has recommended The Route 288 Corridor Plan to the Board of Supervisors. The Plan replaces a portion of The Up_ncr Swift Creek Plan, and reviewed part of The Midlothian Community. plan. With the construction of Route 288, change is coming to the northwestern part of Chesterfield County. The Route 288 Corridor Plan provides a guide for development in the area surrounding the extension of Route 288. At the Board's April 28, 1999 meeting, the Plan area north of Route 60 was deferred for 30 days, and the Plan area south of Route 60 was deferred for 60 days. Important issues addressed in The Route 288 Corridor Plan include: · Attracting high quality economic development proposals to the area. · Updating the County's Thoroughfare Plan to reflect the road network necessary to serve future development in this area. · Maintaining the health of the Swirl Creek Reservoir as a drinking water source for County residents. Preparer: Title: Director of Planning D:DATA/AGENDA/BOS/1999/MAY25 . I/GOK 037 CIIESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: Summary of Information: (Continued) Major recommendations of The Route 288 Corridor Plan include: Provide land uses that maximize economic development opportunities in the area for the future of the County and the region - Approximately 2800 acres have been designated for industrial, office and other employment uses. Adopt standards to increase the quality of development in the area. Promote ongoing efforts to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributary streams. Adopt an ordinance that will require new development to utilize public water and sewer. Create a historic designated area around Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church that will protect these structures for the future. Board Action: Should the Board wish to adopt The Route 288 Corridor Plan as recommended by staff and the Planning Commission, a motion for approval of the Plan as shown with the gray cover as Attachment 1 is appropriate. Should the Board wish to adopt the portion of The Route 288 Corridor Plan north of Midlothian Turnpike, a motion for approval of the Plan as shown with the buff cover as Attachment 2 is appropriate. Attachments: Appendix C: Attachment 1: Attachment 2: Proposed Appendix C: Alternative language to Note 2 of the Land Use Categories (page RT 22, Chart 3). Draft version of The Route 288 Corridor Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. Draf~ version of The Route 288 Corridor Plan as requested by the Board of Supervisors on April 14, 1999. 03S ~ote I1: A regional scale high fashion mall or lifestyle/entertainment center is appropriate at this quadrant ii'integrated with the Regional l~.mplOyment Oen~er uses, subject to the lbllowing ffuidel!nee: For a high fashion mall,/fthere are Wro or less anchor stores, at least one ' oft, he proposed anchors should be a high end, high fashion company, Examples of such companies include, But are not limited to, Nordstom, Bloomingdale's, Nehnan Marcus, Lord & Taylor, and Saks Fit~ Avenue. Ii' there are more than two anchors, an appropriate number should be high end, high fashion companies, so as ~o m-i,,min the intsgriU' of a high fashion mall. For a lifest~yle/entsrcainmenr center, *..he center may or may not include anchor stores, and should create a fonna~ different t~om a t~'pical re~,ional m-I! by including well designed plazas and conunon areas. Examples of such lifescyle/ente~i~tmen~ cenr~rs include, but are not lhni~ed to: The Avenues East Cobb, in Atlanta, GA; ~he Sur~r~it, in Birminiham, AL; Saddlecreek, il~ Memphis, TN; One Pacific, in Omaha, I~FE; Phillips Place, in Charlm.~ce, BI0; and The Shops at Sunset Place, in Miami, FL, Related' uses, such as movie ~ea~ers, theme destination entertainment retailers, other entertainmen~ uses, upsoale restaurants, neighborhood retail, neighborhood services, offices, ho~els, residsnti~ units, and natural amenities could also be included in this q~d,~, provided they are integrated with the high fashion mail or lifestyle/enUertainment center. Design standards should insure the architectural compatibility of such uses. The high fashion mall or lifestyle/entertainmene center should be in~eFrated with the Regional Employment Center, complementing it, rather than ove~rhelmin~ it. · Rour~ 288 should be completed across the James River before a re~ionaJ scale high fashion mall or lifestTle/enter~ainment center is opened. Neighborhood retail uses are zl_,o appropriate in ~i~_ quadrant of the Regional Employmen~ Center provided they are integrated with other designated uses and avoid t~'pical "st'rip commercial" characteristics. #17758§ v.l APPENDIX C Appendix proposed by William Shewmake, Midlothian district Planning Commissioner Draft Appendix C The pnmary purpose of the Regional Employment Center (the "REC") is to encourage the expansion of the local tax base with the development of office, research and development facilities, warehouses and other light industrial uses, as well as retail necessary to support those uses. The REC represents one of the County's last opportunities to establish and promote a large regional employment center. Planning the development of this area is important to the County and its citizens. Typical strip retail development, if allowed, could overwhelm the Route 60/Route 288 corridor and frustrate the goals of the REC. But, this does not mean the REC should be devoid of retail development. An employment area of the magnitude suggested by this Plan must allow and provide for retail services needed to support businesses and employees within the REC. Such a design can also create a symbiotic relationship that helps reduce traffic congestion on Route 60 and Route 711. In addition, a convenient, well designed, and attraclJve shopping complex and lifestyle center wilttin the northwest quadrant of Route 288 and Route 60 can stimulate economic growth by expanding and dlvemifying the local tax base. However, any retail development that simply duplicates the existing retail development by drawing essentially from the existing market area would not be beneficial to the overall tax base of th~County. Ample additional areas for future retail development have already been designated and allowing typical retail to continue to creep down Route 60 would only serve to cannibalize existing retail and frustrate other plans which already provide for additional retail. Instead, a lifestyle center would be desirable if it did not replace existing retail but was instead designed to attract shoppers from a different and wider (regional) matk~ The lifestyle center could serve as a focal point for the REC, contribute to the local ambiance, and create · 'sense of place." Consequently, a high fashion and regional scale lifestyle commercial development (in addition to any permitted supporting and ~ntegmtad neighborhood scale retail uses) would be appropriate within the northwest quadrant of Route 288 and Route 60 based on the following c,'iteda: 1. The majority of the proposed major tenants are classified as high end/high fashion companies. Exantplss inctude, but am not limited to, Nordstroms, Bloomingdales, Neiman Marcus, Lor~l and Taylor, and Sak~ l=llgt Avenue or another ancflor store of comparable quality. A focus should also be on tenants with a 'flagship" store strategy. 2. Flagship stores am larger and have a broader scope of mercttandise than a prototypical regional mall store. These mtallem may combine multiple divisions or merchandise collections within one store. The~ type of stores are also strategioaiN located to draw customers from a larger geographic base. Usually, though not exclusively, flagship stores have one large store to serve a large metropolitan region. 3. High end furnishing or home accessory tenant 4. Entertainment tenants such as movie theaters, other performance venues such as community stage theaters, or theme destination entertainment retailers. 5. Related uses, such as offices, hotels, upscale restatuan~ residential units, and other entertainment uses could also be included within such a lifestyle center provided they are integrated into the complex. If properly integrated or planned, such a complex could also contain some nalghbo~ood retail uses. 6. Route 288 adjacent to the Regional Employment Center should be open to treflk: before any regional retail center is opened. 7. This high-end retail development should complement the employment center and not overwhelm it. 8. Design standards should incorporate architectural compatibBty within the lifestyle em~ cent~'. 9. Any associated and supporting retail use should avoid typical 'strip commen:i~ chatacta~istt~ and provide architectural compatibility, interior circulation, pedestrian access features, and other design elentents to better integrate such uses into the REC. THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The newest gateway into Chesterfield County, the Route 288 Corridor, will provide unmatched economic development potential for northwestern Chesterfield. Currently, this area mainly contains agricultural uses and vacant land. Over the next several years, with effective planning and the support of local property owners and citizens, this area can become one of the region's premier office and light industrial employment centers. Important Issues addressed in the Route 288 Corridor planning effort include: · Recognizing the key strategic location of the Route 288 Corridor for future economic development in northwestern Chesterfield County. · Updating the County's Thoroughfare Plan to reflect the road network necessary to serve future development in this area. · Maintaining the health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir as a drinking water source for County residents. · Attracting high quality economic development proposals to the area. · Providing adequate public facilities to address the impact of new development. Key Findings include: · Vacant Land: The area is largely undeveloped and zoned for agriculture at this time, with only three subdivisions and a few other residences scattered throughout the study area. · Potential for Change: With the construction of Route 288, the area will see tremendous change over the next several years, from development of infrastructure to the development of new office parks and light industrial uses. · Swift Creek Reservoir: A model developed by a member of the County's Watershed Committee found that existing and projected land uses in the watershed would result in an in-lake phosphorous concentration of .0493 milligrams/liter (mg/I). A consultant-conducted study found that the land use modifications anticipated by this Plan would result in an in-lake phosphorous concentration of .0501 mg/I, a 1.5 percent increase over the concentration predicted by the original watershed committee model. VVhile both the original model and the consultant's study evaluated the impact of several land use scenarios on phosphorus concentrations in the Reservoir, the values reported in this discussion refer only to average lot sizes of one half acre. This residential density was used because it is considered to be the most likely to be implemented. · Public Facilities: There are limited public facilities and utilities in the area. As development occurs, public utilities will have to be constructed by the developers. · Historic Resources: There are four (4) historic resources in the study area; only one (1) of them, Hallsborough Tavern, is designated as a County historic landmark. All four (4) are in good condition. · Emerging Opportunities: This area, due to its proximity to an excellent transportation network, regional employment centers and a well educated work force, is poised to become another regional employment center. Major Recommendations of The Plan: · Provide land uses that maximize economic development opportunities in the area for the future of the County and the region. · Adopt standards to increase the quality of development required in this area. · Promote ongoing efforts to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributary streams. · Adopt an ordinance that will require new development to utilize public water and sewer. · Create a historic area around Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church that will protect these structures for the future. DRAFT 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Table Of Contents Introduction The Citizen Participation Process Existing Conditions and Important Issues Emerging Opportunities A Plan For Action Goals Recommendations The Land Use Plan Page RT 1 RT 2 RT 3 RT 13 RT 16 RT 17 RT 20 Map A B C D E F List of Maps Base Map Approved Area Developments Existing Generalized Land Use Historic Resources Character Type Map The Route 288 Corridor Land Use and Thoroughfare Plan8 Follows Page RT 1 RT 4 RT 5 RT 10 RT 12 RT 21 DRAFT 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan INTRODUCTION The Route 288 Corridor Plarl area (as shown on Map A), located in northwest Chesterfield County, is an area that is currently used primarily for agriculture, large lot residences or vacant land. VVith the construction of Route 288, many changes will occur in the area. Route 288 will bring regional access, connecting western Chesterfield with Powhatan, Goochland and Henrico and providing opportunities for the entire County. Route 288's importance to the region is vital. The limited access highway will connect to Powhite Parkway, extend through Chesterfield, with new intemhanges at Lucks Lane/Center Pointe Parkway, Woolddge Road Extended and Midlothian Turnpike. It will go through Powhatan County, cross the James River, connecting with the West Creek development in Goochland County and Interstate 64. Chesterfield County residents and businesses will then have direct access to Goochland and western Henrico County. This access will provide additional opportunities for economic development in the Route 288 Corddor area that were not present previously. Development that occurs as a result of Route 288 must be guided to ensure that full advantage is taken of this unique opportunity for Chesterfield. This area is an important part of Chesterfield County's economic future. This .Plan seeks to maximize the opportunities presented by the construction of Route 288, providing a guide for positive development of the area. How This Plan Works The Route 288 Corridor Plan, once adopted by the Board of Supervisors, will become part of The Plan for Chesterfield, the County's comprehensive plan. The Plan for Chesterfield is used by County citizens, staff, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as a guide for future decisions in the County, including, but not limited to, decisions regarding future land use, road networks and rezonings. Once The Route 288 Corridor PJan is adopted, it will replace parts of The Upper Swift Creek Plarl (1991) and The Midlothian Community_ Plar~ (1989). The adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plan will not, however, change any of the current ordinance requirements adopted to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek watershed. The Route 288 Corridor Plan makes no recommendations to change land uses in The Midlothian Communi.ty Plan, but there are proposed amendments to the County's Thorou_~hfare Plarl within The Midlothian Community. Plat} area that are recommended. A Plan for Action The following main components are found in The Route 288 Corridor Plan: · Existing Conditions and Important Issues: This information forms the factual basis for the goals, recommendations and implementation strategies found in the Plan. · Emerging Opportunities: This section highlights changes that wiJI be brought by Route 288 and the opportunities that are associated with its construction. Goals: These are general statements about what is desirable for the future - what the Plan attempts to accomplish. · Recommendations: These are statements on ways to reach the goals and what actions should be taken to achieve them. · The Land Use and Transportation Plan: The Plan will be used as a guide for future development decisions. DRAFT RTl 2/23/99 Revised Draft (Map A) B~e~=~~.~~M~Rt. 288 Corridor Plan / ~o~o~e Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department November, 1998 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS The Importance of Citizen Participation In order for any plan to stand the test of time, citizens must support it. Citizen support for a plan and its concepts is built through a process of citizen involvement where citizens' viewpoints, questions and concerns are considered and taken into account. This Plarl seeks to build upon the interests of citizens in the County, present and future. Public Involvement To respond to the high level of citizen and community interest in this Plan, numerous meetings were held with citizens, community groups, property owners and individuals. A mailing list was maintained of all property owners in the area, as well as anyone who requested information about the Plarl or attended any meetings about the Plan. At two (2) informational meetings held in Summer 1997, approximately 180 citizens attended to find out more about the planning process and the study area. Over the course of the next ten (10) months, approximately twenty (20) smaller meetings were held with interested citizens to keep them informed about the planning process. In June 1998, the concepts of the Plan were reviewed with citizens for their input at four (4) public meetings, with a total attendance of approximately 200 people. Citizens shared ideas with staff throughout the planning process and offered staff suggestions to make this Plan one that will be successful in the future. The Route 288 Corridor Plan's successful implementation will be a joint effort by the County and community. DRAFT RT2 ?_F23,/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IMPORTANT ISSUES Extensive analysis of existing conditions in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, including valuable information generated through the citizen participation process, forms the foundation for identifying key planning issues and factors. Information about the Route 288 Corridor was gathered from many sources, including field surveys and County records. An understanding of the characteristics and trends that influence development potential in the area provides a sound basis for planning and policy decisions that will shape the Route 288 Corridor's future. Key findings from the research include: · The majority of the land in the planning area is currently vacant or held in large agricultural or residential pamels; · Numerous proposed large scale development projects are zoned in or near the planning area that could have a significant effect on future growth and traffic patterns; · The area has important environmental features, including the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, streams and wetlands. Demographic and Economic Information Demographic and economic information was obtained from 1990 U. S. Census data. The data was updated where possible by using field surveys conducted by the Chesterfield County Planning Department to determine the number and type of houses in the area. Estimates of population were then based on the observed number of houses multiplied by the number of persons per household in 1990. · Population: The population of the planning area in 1997 was approximately 1,040 people, .4 pement of the 1997 Planning Department's County-wide estimate of 250,000. Income and Unemployment: 1990 Census data shows unemployment in the planning area was 2 percent, below the County-wide figure of 3.3 percent. The estimated 1990 median household income of the planning area was $66,535, above Chesterfield's $43,604. The poverty level was 2.7 percent compared to the County's 6 percent. Chart 1 Home Ownership Comparisons Study Area ~[BIB[~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ i Countywide ~ ~ ~ ~ ""="~" """""~'= maaamm ~ I a,..~. I 0% oo/, o'/0 so% o'/0 oo% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department/U.S. Census (1990) · Community: The community is very stable as the area is rural and has seen slow growth. Chart 1 shows that 96 percent of the planning area's residences are owner-occupied. Land Use The Route 288 Corddor planning area consists mostly of agricultural uses and vacant land. Land use data was gathered from an existing database of County real estate tax records and field surveys. There DRAFT RT3 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan are 526 parcels in the planning area. The combined area of those parcels is approximately 6,943 acres; 2.4 percent of Chesterfield County's 285,702 total acres. Large Tracts: There are thirty-three (33) parcels that each exceed fifty (50) acres, and combined account for about 5,022 acres or 72 percent of the planning area's acreage. Approximately 67 percent of these parcels are zoned for agriculture and approximately 72 percent are currently vacant or used for agriculture. These tracts are located throughout the area and present opportunities for future large scale development projects. Existing Zoning: The zoning of property determines the uses that are allowed on that land. For example, property that is zoned for residential land uses will have a zoning category that begins with R. The number following the R represents the required lot size for the category (R-7 requires a minimum 7,000 square foot lot, R-9 requires a minimum 9,000 square foot lot and so on). Agricultural (A) zoning allows large lot residential uses and farm uses. It may also be the zoning category for land that has not yet been zoned to another category for development. Table 1 shows a breakdown of zoning categories for the Route 288 planning area. As shown in the table, the majority of the land in the planning area is currently zoned A. The few office and commercially zoned areas are primarily Table 1 Zoning Analysis Percentages given are rounded. Zoning Acres Pct. A (Agricultural) 4,900 71% R-7 (Residential) 481 7% R-9 921 13% R-15 177 3% R-25 33 0% 0-2 (Office) 149 2% C-2 (Commercial) 3 0% C-3 75 1% I-1 (Light Industry) 204 3% Rt. 288 Study Area 6,943 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department located along Midlothian Turnpike with a concentration just before the Powhatan County line. Most of the industrial zoning is in the Sommerville development located on Midlothian Turnpike. Table 2 Approved Future/Adjacent Developments Because most of the existing zoning in this area was zoned through a Conditional Use Planned Development, specific uses allowed may not be reflected through the underlying zoning category. Name Zoning and Acreage per Category Comment Acropolis i69 ~O-2 iMixed -Use development allowing office and commercial i iuses' i~'fii:~'~iS~'~'~;~; ...... T~ ............. i'6,:;:~'7~,5'~;~'¥7~:;:~'~' 7~i.~*~.~-~.:ia-~i:i:i~7~:iV~.;~.~;;i~-~;~r-;~;i~;;~;~;F~.~;~ ......... i iC-3 (41), O-2 (400) commercial uses. ~[~'~i'~'F'~'~i"i,';~"!~'i~ ............. i~:~"(7~'~i;'Ti"~'~'i'~"~"~;'~i"~"_S"(S'~;~ ............ ~'i~l'_'O"~'~;~'~i'~i~;;~i"~'ii;i~i['~"F~'~';;i~[r~ij';'~'~;"~ ........ icommercial uses. This development also includes the ......... Midlothian campus of John Tyler Community College. G re~'~'l~:i'~ ..... ~'~:1'~' ......... i'lS,;{J'i'¥[j~,'~:~i' ~'-'~ ' ~'~§'~ .................................. I~:~'~J;0'~'~'~'~;~i~'l~'~;~'";'i(~i~ ~'~i~'~ ~¥~{~'~ ~'~a ......... commercial uses. f'fi~"~;"~{;~ ........... ~ ............. i'~::6"i'~'6~:'~'~ "i~:~'~"i'~'~:'~'i"'i~:"fi~"'i~'6:'~ ~'~i~'~'~a"0'~'~'~;;i~i'~'ii~i~'7~i~i'~¥~'~; ................ i iR-DF (21 3), O-2 (16.6), C'-3 (56 7) 'icommercia, outdoor recreational, and public/semi-public ................... : ............ ~ .................... ~ ........................................................................... _...'.u.~,.s.:.: ................................................................................................... Sommerv,lle j140 ~1-1 iMixed-Use development allowing residential, office, light ~industdal and commercial uses, limited commercial uses. ;ource: Chesterfield County 151anning Department Approved Area Developments: There are seven (7) major approved developments in, or immediately adjacent to, the planning area and near the proposed extension of Route 288 (see Map B). These seven (7) developments are Acropolis, CenterPointe, Charter Colony, Greenspdngs, The DRAFT RT4 z/23/99 Virginia Watkins Nurseries I.'''1 Ivymont Square Charter John Tyler Community College Note: The boundaries shown are approximate and for general reference only. Prepared by the ------- 't-- , Chesterfield County ~,1 -C~'ee~-,_- Planning Department //, November. 1998 No Scale -- ~ _ i Brandermill Revised Draft (Map B) APPROVED AREA DEVELOPMENTS Village NPIKE ~CA ........ ~.,' ,.:;; ;;;;; .', .', . ' ' :TI~ ~rbve;..;!:: ====================== ,,;,,,;,;-;,,; - , THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Grove, Sommerville and Waterford. All of these projects have seen limited development or have not begun to develop. Land Use Analysis This land use analysis reviewed the existing use of property in the Route 288 planning area in 1998 (see Map C). It does not analyze what the land is zoned or what the property is designated for in the future. Undeveloped and Agricultural Land: This category includes vacant land and agricultural uses as well as residential uses on parcels ten (10) acres or greater. It accounts for 200 parceis and 6,285 acres, approximately 90 percent of the total acreage in the planning area. These parcels var'), in size and are located throughout the planning area. Most of the land is zoned for agricultural or residential uses. Table 3 Existing Land Use Percentages given are rounded. Land Use Acres Percentage Undeveloped and 6,285 90% Agricultural Residential 445 6% Commercial 107 2% IndustriaROffice 81 1% Public~,Semi-Public 24 1% Total 6,943 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department P,esidential: This includes all parcels currently used for homes on less than ten (10) acres. Residential land uses comprise 445 acres (6.4 percent) of the planning area. Approximately one-third of the residences are scattered on agriculturally zoned parcels of less than ten (10) acres in size. The remaining are in residential neighborhoods. Currently there are three (3) neighborhoods in the area: Huguenot Ridge, located on Huguenot Springs Road; Buckingham Manor, on Otterdale Road; and Otterdale, also on Otterdale Road. Huguenot Ridge has thirty (30) approved lots, six (6) of which have been developed. Buckingham Manor has developed thirteen (13) of its eighteen (18) approved lots, while Otterdale Subdivision has developed 137 of its 140 approved lots. Commercial: Commercial uses account for approximately 1.5 percent of the planning area's land use (107 acres). These uses are located along Midlothian Turnpike. The primary commercial uses are Watkins Nursery and Windy Hill Sports Complex. Watkins Nursery grows and sells plants for landscaping purposes and plans to relocate before the construction of Route 288. Windy Hill Sports Complex is on the west-bound side of Midlothian Turnpike just past Huguenot Springs Road. The complex has batting cages, miniature golf, a driving range and has recently added a nine-hole golf course. Industrial: Industrial and office land uses account for 1.2 percent or eighty-one (81) acres of the planning area's uses. These uses include the Sommerville Industrial and Office Park and a Virginia Power substation on Dry Bridge Road, one-half mile south of Midlothian Turnpike. It has several high voltage transmission wires leading to it through several properties. · Public/Semi Public: See Public Facilities on page RT 7. Environmental Factors In guiding future land use decisions in the planning area, environmental features should be considered. Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed: The portion of the planning area south of Midlothian Turnpike is located in this 41,950 acre watershed and contains two (2) of the nine (9) major tributaries that drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir. Located west of Route 288 between Route 360 and Genito Road, the Swift Creek Reservoir covers 1,700 acres. One of Chesterfield County's three (3) principal water sources, it produces approximately eight (8) million gallons of drinking water per day for 30 percent of County citizens. The Reservoir also functions as a recreational and aesthetic resource for residents of DRAFT RT5 2/23/99 Residential Commercial Industrial Public/Semi-Public Vacant/Agricultural Draft (Map C) Rt. 288 Corridor Plan i ....... ,,~.,. .... Study Are~ Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department June, 1998 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan surrounding areas. At this time, the Reservoir's overall water quality is good. However, only a small portion of the Reservoir's watershed, approximately 12 percent, is developed. The remainder of the large watershed area has been recommended by County plans for significant future growth. Without adequate management, such growth could result in the generation of large amounts of nutrients and pollutants on the Reservoir. These could cause taste and odor problems in the treated water, excessive algae blooms and depleted oxygen levels, affecting fish and other aquatic organisms, the aesthetic value of the Reservoir and its viability as a drinking water supply. Further, nutrients and pollution in the Reservoir may have an economic impact as well. As water quality decreases, the cost of treatment can increase. To address alt of these concerns, in 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Watershed Management Plan for the area. The Watershed Management Plat] includes an in-lake phosphorous limit and establishes measures such as a reduced phosphorous standard for new residential development and the construction of regional Best Management Practice(BMP) basins to filter pollutants to meet this limit. Watershed Standards and The Route 288 Corridor Plan: Early in the planning process, citizens expressed concern about the continued health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir. Their concerns focused on higher intensity uses that may be allowed as a result of this Plan. In order to respond effectively to these concerns, the Environmental Engineering Department contracted with a consultant to update the land uses in the water quality model used by the County and the County's Watershed Management Committee to reflect the recommended land uses in The Route 288 Corridor Plan. The results of this modeling showed that the land use modifications anticipated by this Plar~ would result in an in-lake phosphorous concentration of .0501 milligrams/liter, a 1.5% increase over the concentration predicted by the original watershed committee model. While both the original model and the consultant's study evaluated the impact of several land use scenarios on phosphorus concentrations in the Reservoir, the values reported in this discussion refer only to average lot sizes of one half acre. This residential density was used because it is considered to be the most likely to be implemented. Tributary Streams: The Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed contains nine (9) tributary streams that lead to the Reservoir. Two (2) of these, Tomahawk Creek and Little Tomahawk Creek, drain to the Route 288 Corridor planning area. Tributary streams are important to the health of the reservoir because they can convey pollutants to the Reservoir. Further, the streams are also important environmental resources. The direct benefits of the streams include providing wildlife habitat and aesthetic value to an area. Stream water quality can be adversely affected as a result of sediment, metals and bacteria running off parking lots and other paved surfaces. In particular, the high levels of imperviousness (surfaces which do not absorb water) typically associated with commercial and high density residential growth can adversely affect streams by increasing the volume of water draining to them. This can result in a number of impacts, including stream bank erosion and sedimentation, resulting in negative impacts on aquatic organisms in the streams and affect aesthetics as well. Where appropriate, stream buffers can provide protection of wetland and floodplain areas which, in turn, serves to control both the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff. Topography and Soils: The topography of the planning area consists principally of flatlands and rolling hills typical of the Piedmont physiographic region. Soils in the planning area can be characterized as moderately to well drained. There are some areas, however, that are characterized by clayey or hydric soils, which do not drain well. Existing Regulations to Protect the Reservoir: The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, Upper Swift Creek, Floodplain and Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinances are the regulations that limit the amount of pollutants entering the Reservoir from both non-residential and residential growth. As a DRAFT RT6 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan means of further reducing the amount of pollutants, the recently adopted Watershed Management Plan for the watershed establishes a stringent phosphorus standard for new development and recommends the installation of a series of regional retention basins to filter a significant portion of the pollutants in stormwater runoff from developed land. Existing Regulations to Protect Streams: The two (2) measures to protect the streams are the County's Erosion and Sediment Control and Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinances. The first Ordinance limits the amount of sediment that is allowed to enter a stream during construction activities. The second Ordinance establishes Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) adjacent to perennial streams. The establishment of RPAs is intended to ensure an adequate buffer between environmentat resources (such as wetlands and streams) and development. RPAs reduce and filter the pollutants in stormwater runoff. The RPA boundaries in the watershed were established by delineating an area measured from the limits of the 100 year floodplain where available or from the edge of hydric soils. As it is currently written, the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinance allows these RPA areas to be reduced by permitting the area to be "redelineated" by measuring the area from field-delineated wetlands rather than the floodplain. In most cases, these redelineations result in a reduction in the RPA, thus affording less protection for the streams. Further, 100 year floodplain areas adjacent to non-perennial streams can be cleared. Public Facilities Facilities: There are no parks, schools, fire or rescue stations currently located in the planning area boundaries. However, the County's 1995 Public Facilities Plan recommends construction of an elementary school in the southeastern part of the planning area by the year 2015. A community park and a fire station are also planned within the planning area. John Tyler Community College: John Tyler Community College-Northern Branch will be located in the southwestern quadrant of the intersection of Charter Colony Parkway and Woolridge Road Extended. Public Water/Wastewater Systems Existing Water and Wastewater Systems: The use of public water and wastewater systems is currently recommended for all development within The Upper Swift Creek Plarl. Provisions of the County Code and conditions of zoning, tentative subdivision and/or site plan approval may require the use of public systems. Due to the variability of construction costs and other factors, specific water and wastewater line extensions needed for future development should be discussed far in advance with the Utilities Department. Information relating to water and wastewater infrastructure may be found in The Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan. The planning area is served by several large water mains, a twenty-four (24) inch line along Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) and a twenty-four (24) inch line along Coalfield Road. The area is also served by an existing water tank at Huguenot Springs Road. That portion of the planning area located south of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a sixty (60) inch wastewater trunk along Genito Road, the Upper Swift Creek wastewater pumping station and the Bailey's Bridge pumping station. An eighteen (18) to twenty-seven (27) inch wastewater trunk along Little Tomahawk Creek has been D RAFT RT7 2/23/'99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan extended to serve the John Tyler Community College-Northern Campus and adjacent properties. That portion of the planning area located north of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a twenty-one (21) to thirty (30) inch wastewater trunk along Michaux Creek and by the Michaux Creek wastewater pumping station. These two (2) facilities are supported by a thirty/thirty-six (30/'36) inch wastewater trunk located along the James River. That area of the Plan bordered by Midlothian Turnpike, Huguenot Springs Road and the Cheste~eld/Powhatan County line cannot be served by a direct gravity line extension from the Michaux Creek system. The topography of this area dictates that it naturally drains west toward Powhatan County and would require the construction of a small pumping station to access the public wastewater system. Existing facilities are sized to provide capacity consistent with those land uses reflected in the Plan. Should more intense land uses be pursued which would be considered heavy water users and wastewater generators, detailed analyses may be necessary to address impact on the existing public water and wastewater systems. Future Water and Wastewater Systems: The County's long-standing policy "Growth Pays For Growth," as reflected in the County's Upper Swift Creek Plan is applicable in the Route 288 Corddor planning area as well. Unless the construction of a new facility is undertaken by the County (including upgrading of pumping stations and construction of water tanks) to address system reliability or water quality concerns, the majority of future water and wastewater facilities depicted on the County's Water and Wastewater Facilitie~ Plan are anticipated to be constructed by private development interests. Current County policies may provide some rebating of construction costs to developers for off-site extensions and line over-sizing. Development within the planning area will require the extension of major water mains as well as smaller lines to serve specific sites. Major lines proposed include sixteen (16) inch and twenty-four (24) inch lines along Otterdale Road, north and south of Old Hundred Road, along Old Hundred Road, east and west of Otterdale Road, a twenty (20) inch line along Mt. Hermon Road and a twelve/twenty (12/20) inch line between Robious Road and Midlothian Turnpike. A water tank, to be located in the vicinity of DuVal Road, should provide additional system support for the planning area. The extension of major wastewater trunks, as well as sub-trunks, and collector lines will be required for development within the planning area. Major trunks proposed include an eighteen (18) inch to twenty- seven (27) inch trunk along Tomahawk Creek and an eighteen (18) inch to thirty-six (36) inch trunk along Swift Creek. These trunk extensions will begin at the existing sixty (60) inch trunk along Genito Road and will require smaller extensions along several upstream tributaries. Sub-trunk extensions from the Little Tomahawk and Michaux Creek trunks will be necessary to serve specific development sites. Upgrading or expansion of the Michaux Creek, Upper Swift Creek and Bailey's Bridge wastewater pumping stations will eventually be necessary as development occurs within the planning area and within The Up.Der Swift Creek Plan area. The proposed new and expanded facilities are sized to meet the capacity requirements anticipated by those land uses reflected in the Plan. However, should more intense uses be pursued which would require much higher water demands and generate much higher levels of wastewater flows, detailed analyses may be necessary to address system capacity issues. These analyses would need to address the ability of current water sources and treatment plant sites to meet these potential higher demands and flows. Transportation Existing Conditions: Much of the Route 288 Corridor is served by two-lane roads, such as Huguenot Springs Road, Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road and Coalfield Road. Charter Colony Parkway, a new two- lane facility, was recently completed from the vicinity of Midlothian High School south to Coalfield Road. Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) is the major East/VVest road in the Corridor and is a four-lane highway with a median. Traffic signals are located at its intersections DRAFT RT8 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan with Old Hundred Road and Otterdale Road. The following are average daily traffic volumes on some of the major roads in the corridor: Midlothian Turnpike, west of Winterfield Road Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School Coalfield Road between Queensmill and the YMCA Huguenot Springs Road Mount Harmon Road between Old Hundred and Hallsboro Roads Old Hundred Road between Dry Bridge and Otterdale Roads Otterdale Road between Midlothian Turnpike and Otterdale Road 23,465 (1997) 2,615 (1997) 15,370 (1997) 1,160 (1996) 340 (1996) 4,260 (1997) 2,150 (1997) Coalfield Road, which originates in the Village of Midlothian and is the primary north/south traffic carrying facility in the Corridor, is the only road that is currently operating at capacity. A Norfolk Southern rail-line runs east and west through the Corridor, south of and parallel to Midlothian Turnpike. According to the Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT's) Rail and Public Transportation section, this line carries two (2) trains per day. The design of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway through the Corridor to the northern County line has been completed. Ultimately, Route 288 in the Corridor area will be a four (4) lane, interstate-style limited access facility with interchanges located at Lucks Lane/Centre Pointe Parkway, Woolridge Road Extended and Midlothian Turnpike. Collector/Distributor (C/D) roads will be provided throughout most of the Corridor. These C/D roads will run parallel to the mainline lanes and will allow vehicles entering and exiting Route 288 to do so without interfering with mainline traffic. The initial phases of construction will result in a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. Right-of-way acquisition is currently underway. First phase construction of the section between the Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled to begin in the Fall of 1998. First phase construction of the section north of Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled for the Spring of 2000. In 1989, the Board of Supervisors adopted a County-wide Thoroughfare Plan. Changes to the 1989 Thoroughfare Plan will be necessary due to the Route 288 project and approved development in the area. Other Road Projects In The Route 288 Corridor Area: In addition to Route 288, the following are other road projects in or adjacent to the Route 288 Corridor: 1. Old Hundred Road - Between Dry Bddge Road and Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road has narrow travel lanes and inadequate shoulders. This project will reconstruct two (2) lanes to provide adequate travel lane and shoulder widths and will improve vertical and horizontal alignments where necessary. Although this project is in the current Six Year Construction Plan. construction funds have not been allocated. 2. Woolridge Road Extended - A short section of Woolridge Road Extended has been completed connecting Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School, with Coalfield Road at the YMCA. A further extension of Woolridge Road will connect Coalfield Road at the YMCA with Midlothian Turnpike, east of the Village of Midlothian, at the existing intersection of Midlothian Turnpike with Walton Park Road and Old Buckingham Road. VVhen completed, this road will provide a southern Midlothian bypass and should divert a significant volume of traffic from the section of Midlothian Turnpike that passes through the Village of Midlothian. Construction is underway and should be completed by Fall 1999. 3. Charter Colony Parkway - To improve access to Midlothian High School and the future John Tyler Community College campus, westbound dual left-turn lanes and a traffic signal will be installed at the Midlothian Turnpike/Charter Colony Parkway intersection. Additional lanes will be constructed on Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian Turnpike and across the DRAFT RT9 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan frontage of Midlothian High School, to provide left-turn lanes at school entrances. Construction of this project is anticipated to begin in 1998. Historic Resources This area of Chesterfield County has many significant historical structures (see Map D). Most are still in use today and have been well preserved. Information on historic resources was taken from ,Jeffrey O'Delrs 1983 book, Chesterfield County: Eady Architecture and Historic Sites. The following list of histodc sites includes all of those inventoried in the book which are still existing in the planning area. All of these structures are located near Midlothian Turnpike and are part of what was a small hamlet which centered around Hallsborough Tavern. Bethel Baptist Church (100 Huguenot Springs Road): This structure was erected in 1894 behind Hallsborough Tavern and is the only nineteenth century brick church in Chesterfield County. The building is a Gothic Revival structure with a steep, gable roof sheathed in slate. Chapel Hill (194 Huguenot Springs Road): Built in 1903 by Dr. W. D. Sydnor, this house is a central passage plan I-house featuring a front-cross gable, interior end brick chimneys and octagonal-roofed turrets. Hallsborough Tavern (16300 Midlothian Turnpike): This structure was originally built by James Howard around 1810 toserve as a tavern and retail store. The next owner, Austin Spears, added a two story wing in 1832 to accommodate guests. This structure eventually served as the area's post office. This building has been altered several times since its original construction. Currently, it is being used for retail purposes. DRAFT RTl 0 2/23/99 Study Area Boundary N No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department November, 1998 Revised Draft (Map D) IRt, 288 Corridor Plan / Bethel Baptist Church Chapel Hill Hatlsboro Tavern Mt. Sinai Baptist Church & Cemetary THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Mount Sinai Baptist Church (200 Old Hundred Road): Erected in 1884, this was the first church built to serve the area's African-American community. Construction funds were raised from donations and festivals. The original structure under,vent major remodeling in 1948 and again in 1969. Land Character Types Based on field surveys, information provided by County Departments, maps of existing land use, the location of significant water bodies and Chesapeake Bay Resource Protection Areas, a character type inventory of the planning area was conducted as a means of classifying land areas (see Map E). Four (4) character types depict the visual environment of the planning area. Below are the character types, their definitions and significance to the area. · Forested Description: Managed forests and natural wooded areas which include a mix of pine and hardwood. Significance: Forest land is significant both environmentally and aesthetically. Environmentally, forests protect the soil, produce oxygen, provide opportunities for recreation and play a role in a variety of natural environmental systems. Forested land contributes to the rural and natural "feel" of an area and may buffer different land uses from one another. · Agriculture and Open Space Description: Cropland, open fields, pastures and recreational areas. Significance: Agricultural land uses are particularly significant to the visual quality and ambiance of an area because of the seasonal changes and variety. The textures and colors of the open fields are particularly attractive from rural roadways, especially in areas with rolling terrain. · Residential Description: Subdivisions are a grouping of suburban type housing linked by a planned road network and are marked with an identifiable entrance. Strip residential development consists of homes located along roadways, generally fronting arterials and collectors in a linear configuration. Significance: Although the planning area remains relatively undeveloped, consisting of only three (3) neighborhoods, growth is expected to occur in the next few years as the completion of Route 288 nears. · Office, Commercial and Industrial D_es_c,[J.0J/O~: Most of these uses in the planning area, which includes Watkins Nursery, are rural, family-owned businesses or are buffered and blend in with the character of the surrounding area. The exception to this is the Virginia Power substation which is significantly screened from view by forested areas. DRAFT RTl 1 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Significance: Currently, these uses account for a very small portion of the development in the planning area. However, upon the completion of Route 288 and other transportation improvements, these types of uses are expected to increase and become dominant in the area. DRAFT RTl2 2/23/99 Revised Draft (Map E) 288 Corridor Plan / Forested Ag dcultural/O pen Space Residential/Churches Office/Commercial/Industrial No Scale Prepared by the ChesterfieJd County Planning Depaxtment January 11, 1999 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES The completion of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway to Interstate 64 will greatly accelerate development activity in all of northwest Chesterfield County and throughout the region. Not only will this new highway open up access to a relatively undeveloped part of Chesterfield, it will provide a direct link across the James River to Goochland County's West Creek Business Park, home of the proposed Motorola semiconductor plant and western Henrico's business district. Effective planning in this area will assure that, as growth occurs, it is properly guided, taking advantage of a prime opportunity for needed economic development, while maintaining environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. Chesterfield and The Metropolitan Region's Economy Chesterfield County has historically been a "bedroom community" for the Richmond metropolitan area, providing a greater proportion of places to live than places to work. This has a large fiscal impact on the County, since the cost of providing services to residential development is greater than what it pays the County in taxes (see Chart 2). Business revenue to the County provides most of the additional funds necessary to provide residential services. Therefore, a balance between economic development and residential growth is important. $1,166 Chart 2 Share of Cost of County Services Per Chesterfield Household $642 · Taxes Paid by Household n Taxes Paid by Business · Other Sources $t,930 Source: Chesterfield County Budget Department In 1997, the Chesterfield Planning Department analyzed the County's Comprehensive Plan to determine the number of acres that should be recommended for office and industrial use to meet long-range economic goals for the Count'),. This analysis compared the County's existing share of the region's economic base and the amount of land recommended for office and industrial use in the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Using a moderate level growth forecast covering the period to 2044, the analysis identified a land use plan deficit of approximately 2,250 acres of land recommended for industry and 4,350 acres of land recommended for office use, totaling 6,600 additional acres necessary, but not yet designated for, office and industrial uses in the County's adopted Plans. Jobs and Location Chesterfield needs more businesses to balance residential growth and provide quality jobs for its citizens. Not all jobs are created equal; attracting "basic sector" jobs, like those associated with corporate offices and light industry, will be of greater benefit to the citizens of Chesterfield County. These jobs are higher paying, with better benefits, and generate spin-off employment in other economic sectors, such as retail and service. Quality jobs are especially important in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, as most of Chesterfield's workers live in the northwestern part of the County and most of Chesterfield's major employers are in the eastern part of Chesterfield. DRAFT RTl3 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Timing of Development Typically, the demand for residential construction in highway corridors precedes the market for corporate office and light industrial uses. This area is anticipated to have residential demand due to the development of employment centers at West Creek in Goochland, large employment centers in westem Henrico and a scarcity of land designated for residential development in Goochland and Henrico. With the construction of Route 288, Chesterfield County will only be a short commute over the new James River bridge. There may also be interest in retail development along Midlothian Turnpike, as businesses consider the potential of attracting commuters from Route 288. However, commercial development is already developed nearby at Chesterfield Towne Center, with additional space already planned and zoned at the Route 288/360 interchange area and east and west of Midlothian Village. Planning and Design Issues The future design and configuration of development in the Route 288 corridor is critical to Chesterfield County. Well-planned and constructed development, consolidated and coordinated to the maximum extent possible, will promote a stronger tax base, an aesthetically pleasing environment and the cost effective provision of County services. Most quality, large-scale suburban office and light industrial development in the Richmond region is found in "corporate parks," such as the Arboretum and the Boulders off Midlothian 'rumpike in Chesterfield County, Innsbrook in Richmond's west end and the new West Creek Corporate Park in eastern Goochland County. Common to these developments are basic features that characterize good design and planning including generous landscaping, well designed entrances, use of curbs and gutters along streets, a mix of building heights, effective lighting and parking. Many of these corporate centers have their own strict development standards but, at the same time, incorporate enough flexibility to accommodate market demand. In many cases, a combination of local zoning requirements, improvements proffered by the center's developer at the time of rezoning and deed covenants established by the developer combine to ensure good design and planning. Well-designed corporate centers play an important part in the success of attracting desirable economic development in a regionally and nationally competitive environment. Haphazard and incremental commercial development, especially industrial uses characterized by prefabricated metal buildings, inadequate landscaping and outside storage visible from public areas, can be detrimental to attracting new businesses to an area. DRAFT RTl4 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Another important factor to successful corporate park design is finding parcels of land large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Property owners interested in developing their land often find it is more profitable to group together a number of smaller adjacent parcels into one (1) significant holding. When the market is right, this approach can attract quality, large-scale corporate park development and discourage the piecemeal commercial "stripping" of development along major highways. Where practical and appropriate, the design of commercial uses can incorporate elements from nearby historic buildings, creating a common area theme that helps contribute to community continuity. Effective design also takes into consideration adjacent land character types. DRAFT RTl 5 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan A PLAN FOR ACTION L Goals The vision of the Route 288 Corridor Plan is to effectively guide future development in a way that promotes maximum benefit to Chesterfield County's current and future citizens, while recognizing the importance of property rights, healthy neighborhoods, environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. The goals listed below foster this vision and establish a framework for the Plan's more specific recommendations. A. Basic Principles 1. Recognize the prime importance of the Route 288 Corridor to Chesterfield County's economic future. 2. Take advantage of the benefits to Chesterfield County that Route 288 will have as a primary component of the region's transportation system. 3. Chart a future for the area that takes into account both the interests of the current community and the long-term welfare of all Chesterfield citizens. B. Orderly Growth 1. Guide each type of development to the most appropriate area by following the County's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Discourage development that may be detrimental to long-term economic and environmental goals. 3. Minimize the cost of public facilities by promoting orderly and efficient development. 4. Only approve development proposals supported by public utilities. C. Transportation 1. Provide a safe, efficient and cost-effective transportation system. 2. Control development densities within the Comdor so that smooth flow of traffic is provided on Route 288 and on major arterial and collector streets. 3. Provide for the construction of additional major arterial and collector streets as development occurs to mitigate the increase in traffic generated by development in the Corridor. 4. Properly locate and limit the number of access points to major arterial and collector streets. 5. Encourage pedestrian activity at appropriate locations in the Corridor. D. Economic Opportunities 1. Maximize the economic development potential of the Route 288 Corridor as a prime location for basic sector employment, such as corporate office and light industrial uses. 2. Take advantage of the potential for spin-off economic development from other major employment centers in the region, especially those opportunities for high-tech industry and corporate office centers. 3. Work to provide more basic sector jobs closer to the population centers in northem Chesterfield County. 4. Identify large parcels that are suitable for industrial development. 5. Protect sites identified for industrial use from encroaching residential and retail development. 6. Identify and market parcels appropriate for economic development. E. Resource Protection 1. Maintain the environmental quality of the area. DRAFT RTl6 2_/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan 2. Protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, as well as in the area's perennial and non-perennial streams. 3. Encourage development to accommodate and preserve existing landscape where possible. 4. Protect historic resources in the area by promoting historic designation of identified structures and encouraging development to preserve historic structures. F. Housing 1. Promote housing development that will meet the needs of future residents and businesses. 2. Where residential development is appropriate, strive for a mix of housing options that will complement the County's economic development initiatives. G. Community Character and Design 1. Enhance the aesthetic quality of the area through quality design. 2. Encourage public safety through the effective design of development. 3. Encourage development design that promotes community character. II. Recommendations The following recommendations are the specific actions required to carry out the Route 288 Corridor Plan. These recommendations, combined with the land use plan that follows, will help guide the future of the Route 288 Corridor area. However, these recommendations will require cooperation between businesses, industries, residents and government to make them successful. A. Land Use 1. Land Use Plan: Follow the land use recommendations of the Route 288 Corridor Plan to guide future decision making. Aggregation: Through the zoning process, encourage owners interested in selling smaller land parcels in the Route 288 Corridor to join with adjacent property owners to aggregate land holdings large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Incompatible Uses: Residential land uses should be discouraged in areas designated for non- residential areas in this Plel3 (areas designated for light industrial, office or commercial land uses) and vice versa, except where those uses are permitted by dght. B. Quality Design Large-Scale Development: Encourage large-scale development projects of quality design which follow an office park-planned development approach (i.e., Arboretum, Moorefleld, Boulders). These projects should also include an intemal road network and controlled access. Design Standards: Adopt amendments to the County's Design Standards Manual creating an overlay district for the Route 288 Corridor Plan area in all Regional Employment Center land use areas (see Map F) which would: a) Increase landscaping required in front and corner setbacks for new development. b) Require curb and gutter in all new developments. c) Allow building heights of up to 150 feet. d) Require new development adjacent to Route 288 to orient buildings so that the views of buildings from Route 288 will not be of loading docks, storage areas, etc. e) Require developers to design attractive wet ponds for Best Management Practices (BMPs) that can be incorporated into developments as amenities. DRAFT RTl7 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan f) Enhance requirements for quality architecture. g) Require developments in I-2 Districts to pave their parking lots. h) Limit outdoor storage uses in I-2 Districts. i) Encourage pedestrian access in and around projects and a plan for linking pedestrian access to adjacent properties. 3. Safety: All development proposals should be designed to accommodate public safety needs. Urban Design: The area closest to the Route 288~60 interchange may be appropriate for an urban or neo-traditional scaled and designed development. This concept may include reduced setbacks, formal landscaping, pedestrian access, superior architectural design and other features that are representative of this urban or neo-traditional design. A quality development of this type could be submitted and processed through the County's CUPD (Conditional Use Planned Development) process. C. Economic Growth Proactive Zoning: Because of the economic development opportunities available in this area, not present in other areas of the County, there may be situations where the County would like to encourage development. Additional study of proactive rezoning should be conducted following the adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plan. 2. Opportunity: The Department of Economic Development should continue to identify prime sites in the area and pursue proven developers to build quality office and business parks. Jobs: The Department of Economic Development should determine which types of economic activities (i.e., corporate and divisional headquarters, research and development, light manufacturing, distribution, back office operations, office/office showroom, etc.) will create the best job opportunities (payroll) for County citizens and generate significant tax revenues to Chesterfield County and pursue those uses for the Route 288 planning area. o Marketing: The Economic Development Department should develop and implement a marketing plan to capitalize on location advantages of the Route 288 Corridor, such as its proximity to workers, John Tyler Community College, major roads and Motorola's West Creek Campus. D. Public Facilities Utilities Study: A detailed utilities study should be undertaken to address possible demand/capacity issues, if uses are pursued that are more intense than those reflected by the Plan. 2. Water/Wastewater Ordinance: The County should adopt an Ordinance for this area requiring mandatory hook-up to County water and wastewater at the time of development. 3. Policing Office: As the surrounding communities grow and develop, an appropriate location for a policing office should be identified and permitted in a central, strategic location. 4. Fire/Rescue Facility: A fire/rescue station is planned within the area of Midlothian Turnpike and Route 288 to meet the existing and future demands for service and response time standards. E. Transportation Thorou_ahfare Plan: Amend the County's Thoroughfare Plan in the Route 288 Corridor, as shown on Map F, and use the amended Plan as the guide for transportation recommendations on development proposals. DRAFT RTl 8 2./23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Mitigating Road Improvements: Development proposals within the Corridor should provide mitigating road improvements, to include right-of-way dedication, construction of turn lanes, installation of traffic signalization and shoulder improvements. Access to Arterial and Collector Roads: Through the zoning, site plan review and subdivision review processes, control access to major arterial and collector roads through shared access, adequate access separation and traffic control devices to maintain orderly and efficient traffic flow. 4. Traffic Noise Abatement: Provide setbacks for future sound-sensitive land uses, such as residential development along Route 288, to reduce traffic noise impacts. 5. Pedestrian Access: Develop a network of sidewalks, in accordance with the County's Sidewalk Policy, to provide for pedestrian travel. o Route 288 Funding: The funds that have been allocated for the Route 288 project will provide a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. The County should aggressively pursue completion of Route 288. F. Environmental Resources Vegetation: Through the zoning process, encourage developers to disturb as little landscape and plant life as possible around the entrances and fringes of the project aroa and bodies of water to preserve the area's environmental character and the natural erosion and pollutant controls provided by the undisturbed vegetation. Upper Swift Creek Ordinance: Review and consider the following in conjunction with the Watershed Management Plan and Maintenance Program for the Swift Creek Reservoir: a) Restrict reductions in the pro-established Resource Protection Aroa (RPA) boundaries. b) Prohibit tree removal, clearing or filling in the 100 year floodplain adjacent to perennial and intermittent streams. c) Limit clearing and construction on slopes greater than 20 percent within, or contiguous to, Resource Protection Areas (RPAs). Regional BMPs: If development does take place on a site that is expected to be served by a regional BMP facility, staff will assist the developer in identifying a regional site and will attempt to facilitate discussions among the developer and other landowners for a regional facility. However, staff will not require a regional facility unless the developer and other landowners agree on a voluntary regional approach. If such an agreement is not reached, the developer will be required to provide a BMP facility for his own site. New Development Prior to the Regional BMP Master Plan: New development that takes place prior to the adoption of the Regional BMP Master Plan (Watershed Master Plan and Maintenance Program) currently being developed for the Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed must be encouraged to construct regional BMP facilities where there are technically feasible sites and the County should take reasonable steps and actions to protect and promote those sites. When the BMP Master Plan is adopted, new development must comply with the BMP Master Plan. The County should adopt the BMP Master Plan as soon as possible. o Future Water Quality Technologies: For rezoning requests in the Upper Swift Creek watershed portion of The Route 288 Corridor Plan area, developers should be encouraged, through the use of voluntary proffers, to conform to possible future water quality protection measures and/or technologies. DRAFT RTl 9 2./23199 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan G. Housing and Community 1. Housing Types: Evaluate whether revisions to the County's residential zoning ordinances would encourage a mix of housing options for new workers, complementing the County's economic development initiatives. H. Historic Resources 1. Preserve Structures: Bethel Baptist Church and Hallsborough Tavern, historic structures, should be preserved. Any adjacent development is encouraged to be architecturally compatible. Historic Area: Create an area around Bethel Baptist Church and Hallsborough Tavern, as shown on Map F. Any development in this area is encouraged to incorporate the design characteristics of these historic structures to preserve the historic character of the area. The goal of this area is to maintain the sense of place at this intersection created by Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church: a) On the north side of Midlothian Turnpike, development is encouraged to incorporate design features from the existing historic properties, including building scale, architectural design and texture. Further, development in this area is encouraged to incorporate pedestrian access and sidewalks. b) On the south side of Midlothian Turnpike, properties adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike are encouraged to be similar in scale and architecture to Hallsborough Tavern and Chapel Hill. Development in the remainder of this portion of the historic district may be larger in scale but not overwhelming to the smaller-scale development. Historic Designations: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should work with the property owners of Bethel Baptist Church and Chapel Hill to have these properties designated as County historic landmarks. Historic and Cultural Significance: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should recognize Mount Sinai Baptist Church and Cemetery for their historic and cultural significance to the County, including a plaque at the site explaining the story and significance of the church and initiate steps to designate it as a historic landmark. IlL The Land Use Plan The land use plan for the Route 288 Corridor is a guide for future change. The land use plan illustrates the recommended future development pattem for the Route 288 Corridor area (see Map F). This map will be a useful guide for the future land use and rezoning decisions. Land use categories, their definitions and key features of recommended uses are presented in Chart 3. Successfully implemented, this land use plan will: · Target key land in the northwestern part of Chesterfield County for office, light industrial and corporate park uses; in turn, strengthening the County's tax base and providing new employment opportunities. Promote a land use development pattern that takes best advantage of Route 288's links to the region's transportation system while, at the same time, providing effective transition between new uses and adjacent communities. In the portion of The Route 288 Corridor Plan area that drains to the Swift Creek Reservoir, maintain the current in-lake phosphorous limit and the reduced phosphorous standard for new residential development, as outlined in the County's 1997 VVatershed Management Plar~. DRAFT RT20 2/23/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan The land use plan offers guidance to County staff, elected officials and citizens as new development proposals are brought forward and evaluated. For example, if a landowner is interested in developing his vacant property, which is currently zoned for Agricultural (A) uses, the land use plan will be consulted by staff as they determine their recommendation for the rezoning. If the rezoning request does not comply with the land use designation on the land use plan, staff is not likely to recommend approval of the request. Generally, the land use plan does not recommend changes to the zoning of any land. However, as outlined in the land use recommendations, if the Board of Supervisors chooses to rezone property in this area, this land use plan will be used as a guide. DRAFT RT21 2123/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Chart 3 LAND USE CATEGORIES The categories shown on Map F are described below. Because land use plans are a general guide for recommended future growth, ail uses that coutd possibly be developed cannot be listed here. More detailed information on potential uses can be found in the corresponding categories (i.e., 0-2) of the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance. · Residential (One (1) dwelling or less per acre): Residences, and under certain circumstances, places of worship, schools, parks and other similar public facilities. · Residential (One (1) to two and a half (2 1/2) dwellings per acrs): Residences, and under certain circumstances, places of worship, public schools, parks and other similar public facilities. · Office/Residential Mixed Use: Professional and administrative offices (0-2), residential developments of varying densities, and light industry (I-1). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Office: Professional and administrative offices (0-2). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Convenience Commercial (not shown on Plan): Limited retail, service and office uses (C-1 and O-1) mainly serving nearby neighborhoods or rural locations, generally located at the intersection of through streets (the intersection of two (2) collectors or a collector and an arterial as designated in the Thoroughfare Plan), provided adequate spacing is provided. In developing areas, they should be planned in conjunction with new residential projects. · Neighborhood Mixed Use: Neighborhood-oriented commercial uses (C-2), including small shopping centers. · Light Industrial/Flex: Offices, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1 and some I-2 uses), including research and development uses as well as flex space. Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Regional Employment Center: Office, research and development uses, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1). Moderate industrial uses may be appropriate in some locations if appropriate access, buffering and land use transitions are provided. Under certain circumstances, supporting ......... s.m..al!-.s.c.al.e, .re.t.a!l .u.s.e.s.m..ay..b.e.i.n .co. r.p.o.r .at.e.d.i.n!o..a.la. r.g.e.r .d.e.v.el.o.p.m.e.n.t: ................... Midlothian Ama Community_ Land Use And Transportation Plan: The shaded arsa on Map F shows recommended land uses from this Plan, as adopted in 1989 and amended in 1992. It is shown hers for information purposes only and is not recommended for revision. · Residential Medium Density (1.01 to 2.5 units/acrs): Housing types will be predominantly single family detached units and may also include schools and playgrounds, places of worship and isolated neighborhood service uses. · Planned Transition Area: This arsa is appropriate for mixed-use development that contributes to an overall transition to a smaller-scale, pedestrian--oriented environment in Midlothian Village. Primary uses will include office, medium-density housing (7-14 units/acre), personal services and community facilities. · Suburban Commercial District: Suburban, auto-oriented design district to include retail shopping centers, office-service establishments and similar uses. Note 1: The existing single family residential uses should be maintained and protected until appropriate redevelopment occurs in compliance with the recommended regional employment center land use designation. Zoning standards and proffers shall be used to protect the residential character until the property owners develop this area for the planned land uses. See Appendix B for the properties covered by this note. Note 2: A regional scale high fashion mall or lifestyle center can be appropriate at this quadrant if: · integrated with the regional employment center uses, · the majority of the anchor stores serve a metropolitan-wide market. Neighborhood retail uses may be appropriate if integrated with the other designated uses. DRAFT RT22 2J23/99 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Appendix A PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: Kramer Model Update for 1-288 Corridor Changes Joan Salvati/C-'hesrerfield County Andrea Ryon/CI.I2M HILL Fernando Pasquel/CH2M HILL March 3, 1998 In 1994, Mary, i<ramer, a member of the Chesterfield County Watershed .Management Committee, developed a spreadsheet model (I<ramer model) to evaluate the imp,acts of development within the Upper Swift Creek watershed on water quail .ty in Swift Creek Reservoir. The purpose of Mrs. Kramer's modeling effort was to evaluate ff a phosphorus export goal of 0.22 lb/ac/yr from new residential land uses and 0.45 lb/acre/yr from new nonresidential land uses was sufficient to prevent in-lake phosphorus concenrranons from exceeding 0.05 mg/L, a ievei considered suzrabie to conrroiling eutrophicanon in the reservoir. For existing land uses, watershed pollutant loading factors from two different sources were used: Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed study (CDM, 1989) and CBLAD's factors listed in the Chesterfield County, Calculation Procedures Manual. The empirical Reck_how relationship for southeastern U.S. reservoirs was used to estimate the median summer in- lake total phosphorus concentration. Mrs. Kramer analyzed six different scenarios · existing land use · zoned land use · proposed land use (zoning plus additional proposed projects] · proposed land use with remainder of Counn' built out with 5 acre residennal lots · proposed land use with remainder of Counn- built out with 1 acre residential lots · proposed land use with remainder of Count' built out with 0.5 acre residential lots Since the Kramer model was developed, zoning changes within the 1-288 corridor have been proposed. Because these changes include shifts from residential uses to non-residential uses, total phosphorus loads calculated in the K. ramer model would be expected to increase with the new land uses. To evaluate these changes, the model was re-run with the proposed 1-288 corridor land use changes. A meeting was held with PIanning Department, Department of Environmental Engineering, Economic Development Department and CH2M HILL staff to identify, the differences between the land uses in the existing Kramer model and the proposed land uses in the 1-288 corridor. The modifications to the model required to reflect the new 1-288 corridor land uses are summarized in Table 1. woc/030398~ 131400 · c~4,~ ~F~ATE FCR 1-288 CCRRIDOR CHANGES TABLE 1 - CHANGES IN LAND USE BETWEEN KRAMER MODEL AND PROPOSED 1-288 CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT Subtract Add 300 acre Watkins commerc~ai DroDer~y 1408 acres moaerate m(3ustnal lana use 300 acre commercial deveioDmem a~ong ~Route 60 420 acres light inclustnai tancl use 1682 acres of 2.2 du/ac reslaential area 454 m~xecl use lancl use Equivalent Changes for Residential and Nonresidential Lancl Uses Subtract I Add 600 acres nonresidential ancl 1682 acres of res;aent;al J 2282 acres of nonresidential These modifications were made to the model in order to evaluate the impact on phosphorus loads. The change was applied to the following 4 cases: · proposed land use (zoning plus additional proposed projects) proposed land use with remainder of Court ,ty built out with 5 acre residential lots proposed land use with remainder of Coun .t'y built out with 1 acre residential lots · proposed land use with remainder of Count',' built out with 0.5 acre residential lots The total phosphorus loads and the resulting phosphorus concentration in the reservoir are shown in Table 2 for tt~e original Kramer model and for the modified model. In addition, the % differences between the original calculations and the modified calculations are shown. TABLE 2 · MODEL RESULTS FOR ORIGINAL AND MODIFIED MODEL Proposed Proposeci with Proposed witi~ Proposed with 5-acre build-out 1-acre build-out 0.5.acre build-out Loading factors based on 1989 Swift Creek Reservoir Waterst~ed Study Watershed Phosphorus load (Iblyr) Odginal model 10,525 16,801 16,221 16,221 Modified model 10,912 17,188 16,608 16,608 % change 3.7 2.3 2.4 2.4 Phosphorus concentration in reservoir (rog/L) Odginal model 0.039 Modified model 0.040 % change 2.3 0.056 0.051 0.049 0.056 0.052 0.050 1.4 1.5 1.5 Loading Factors based on CBLAD Watershed Phosphorus Load (Iblyr) Odginal model 8,992 Modified model 9,379 % change 4.3 14,254 14,254 14,254 14,641 14,641 14,641 2.7 2.7 2.7 Phosphorus concentration in reservoir (mgtL} Original model 0.039 Modified model 0.040 % change 2.6 0.055 0.050 0.049 0.055 0.051 0.050 1.6 1.7 3.1 gDC.,/O30398M~.DOC ,RA,V~ ~'~EL L;F~ATE F-2R 1-288 CCRRIOOR CHANGES For the proposed zonin~ condition, zomn~ mod~icanons in the i-288 corridor increase the annual phosphorus load to the reservoir approxuznatel}' 4 %. This change increases the calculated phosphorus concentration un the reservoir from 0.039 m§/L to 0.040 m§/L, an increase of 2.3 - 2.6 percent, which is approximatei}' 80% of the 0.05 mg/L goal. For the three build-out conditions, the calculated in-take phosphorus concentrations were near or above 0.05 rog/L for the original I<ramer model. The modifications increased these estimated concentrations between 1 to 3 %. '~x;/O30398~.nOC 3 Appendix B 0 0 AfTACHMENT 2 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The newest gateway into Chesterfield County, the Route 288 Corridor, will provide unmatched economic development potential for northwestern Chesterfield. Currently, this area mainly contains agricultural uses and vacant land. Over the next several years, with effective planning and the support of local property owners and citizens, this area can become one of the region's premier office and light industrial employment centers. Important Issues addressed in the Route 288 Corridor planning effort include: · Recognizing the key strategic location of the Route 288 Corridor for future economic development in northwestern Chesterfield County. · Updating the County's Thorouqhfare Plan to reflect the road network necessary to serve future development in this area. · Maintaining the health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir as a drinking water source for County residents. · Attracting high quality economic development proposals to. the area. · Providing adequate public facilities to address the impact of new development. Key Findings include: · Vacant Land: The area is largely undeveloped and zoned for agriculture at this time, with only three subdivisions and a few other residences scattered throughout the study area. · Potential for Change: With the construction of Route 288, the area will see tremendous change over the next several years, from development of infrastructure to the development of new office parks and light industrial uses. · Swift Creek Reservoir: Chesterfield County is committed to protectinq and preservinq the water quality of the Swift Creek Reservoir. Study is on-,qoin.q as to how the development of the Route 288 Corridor will impact the Reservoir, and the measures necessa~ to protect the Reservoir. · Public Facilities: There are limited public facilities and utilities in the area. As development occurs, public utilities will have to be constructed by the developers. · Historic Resources: There are four (4) historic resources in the study area; only one (1) of them, Hallsborough Tavern, is designated as a County historic landmark. All four (4) are in good condition. · Emerging Opportunities: This area, due to its proximity to an excellent transportation network, regional employment centers and a well educated work force, is poised to become another regional employment center. Major Recommendations of The Plan: · Provide land uses that maximize economic development opportunities in the area for the future of the County and the region. · Adopt standards to increase the quality of development required in this area. · Promote ongoing efforts to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir and its tributary streams. DRAFT 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Adopt an ordinance that will require new development to utilize public water and sewer. Create a historic area around Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church that will protect these structures for the future. DRAFT RT25 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Table Of Contents Introduction The Citizen Participation Process Existing Conditions and Important Issues Emerging Opportunities A Plan For Action Goals Recommendations The Land Use Plan Page RT 1 RT 2 RT 3 RT 13 RT 16 RT 17 RT 20 Map A B C D E F List of Maps Base Map Approved Area Developments Existing Generalized Land Use Historic Resources Character Type Map The Route 288 Corridor Land Use and Thorouqhfare Plans Follows Page RT 1 RT 4 RT 5 RT 10 RT 12 RT 21 DRAFT 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan INTRODUCTION The Route 288 Corridor Plan area (as shown on Map A), located in northwest Chesterfield County, is an area that is currently used primarily for agriculture, large lot residences or vacant land. With the construction of Route 288, many changes will occur in the area. Route 288 will bring regional access, connecting western Chesterfield with Powhatan, Goochland and Henrico and providing opportunities for the entire County. Route 288's importance to the region is vital. The limited access highway will connect to Powhite Parkway, extend through Chesterfield, with new interchanges at Lucks Lane/Center Pointe Parkway, Woolridge Road Extended and Midlothian Turnpike. It will go through Powhatan County, cross the James River, connecting with the West Creek development in Goochland County and Interstate 64. Chesterfield County residents and businesses will then have direct access to Goochland and western Henrico County. This access will provide additional opportunities for economic development in the Route 288 Corridor area that were not present previously. Development that occurs as a result of Route 288 must be guided to ensure that full advantage is taken of this unique opportunity for Chesterfield. This area is an important part of Chesterfield County's economic future. This Plan seeks to maximize the opportunities presented by the construction of Route 288, providing a guide for positive development of the area. How This Plan Works The Route 288 Corridor Plan, once adopted by the Board of Supervisors, will become part of The Plan for Chesterfield, the County's comprehensive plan. The Plan for Chesterfield is used by County citizens, staff, the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors as a guide for future decisions in the County, including, but not limited to, decisions regarding future land use, road networks and rezonings. Once The Route 288 Corridor Plan is adopted, it will replace parts of The Upper Swift Creek Plan (1991) and The Midlothian Community Plan (1989). The adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plan will not, however, change any of the current ordinance requirements adopted to protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek watershed. The Route 288 Corridor Plan makes no recommendations to change land uses in The Midlothian Community Plan, but there are proposed amendments to the County's Thorouqhfare Plan within The Midlothian Community Plan area that are recommended. A Plan for Action The following main components are found in The Route 288 Corridor Plan: · Existing Conditions and Important Issues: This information forms the factual basis for the goals, recommendations and implementation strategies found in the Plan. · Emerging Opportunities: This section highlights changes that will be brought by Route 288 and the opportunities that are associated with its construction. · Goals: These are general statements about what is desirable for the future - what the Plan attempts to accomplish. · Recommendations: These are statements on ways to reach the goals and what actions should be taken to achieve them. · The Land Use and Transportation Plan: The Plan will be used as a guide for future development decisions. DRAFT RTl 4/22/99 Revised Draft (Map A) Rt. 288 Corridor Plan RD. Study Area Boundary No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department November, 1998 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS The Importance of Citizen Participation In order for any plan to stand the test of time, citizens must support it. Citizen support for a plan and its concepts is built through a process of citizen involvement where citizens' viewpoints, questions and concerns are considered and taken into account. This Plan seeks to build upon the interests of citizens in the County, present and future. Public Involvement To respond to the high level of citizen and community interest in this Plan, numerous meetings were held with citizens, community groups, property owners and individuals. A mailing list was maintained of all property owners in the area, as well as anyone who requested information about the Plan or attended any meetings about the Plan. At two (2) informational meetings held in Summer 1997, approximately 180 citizens attended to find out more about the planning process and the study area. Over the course of the next ten (10) months, approximately twenty (20) smaller meetings were held with interested citizens to keep them informed about the planning process. In June 1998, the concepts of the Plan were reviewed with citizens for their input at four (4) public meetings, with a total attendance of approximately 200 people. Citizens shared ideas with staff throughout the planning process and offered staff suggestions to make this Plan one that will be successful in the future. The Route 288 Corridor Plan's successful implementation will be a joint effort by the County and community. DRAFT RT2 4/22J99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IMPORTANT ISSUES Extensive analysis of existing conditions in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, including valuable information generated through the citizen participation process, forms the foundation for identifying key planning issues and factors. Information about the Route 288 Corridor was gathered from many sources, including field surveys and County records. An understanding of the characteristics and trends that influence development potential in the area provides a sound basis for planning and policy decisions that will shape the Route 288 Corridor's future. Key findings from the research include: · The majority of the land in the planning area is currently vacant or held in large agricultural or residential parcels; · Numerous proposed large scale development projects are zoned in or near the planning area that could have a significant effect on future growth and traffic patterns; · The area has important environmental features, including the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, streams and wetlands. Demographic and Economic Information Demographic and economic information was obtained from 1990 U. S. Census data. The data was updated where possible by using field surveys conducted by the Chesterfield County Planning Department to determine the number and type of houses in the area. Estimates of population were then based on the observed number of houses multiplied by the number of persons per household in 1990. · Population: The population of the planning area in 1997 was approximately 1,040 people, .4 percent of the 1997 Planning Department's County-wide estimate of 250,000. Income and Unemployment: 1990 Census data shows unemployment in the planning area was 2 percent, below the County-wide figure of 3.3 percent. The estimated 1990 median household income of the planning area was $66,535, above Chesterfield's $43,604. The poverty leve[ was 2.7 percent compared to the County's 6 percent. Study Area Countywide 0% Chart 1 Home Ownership Comparisons 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% IQ Owner Source: Chesterfield County Planning DepartmentJU.S. Census (1990) · Community: The community is very stable as the area is rural and has seen slow growth. Chart 1 shows that 96 percent of the planning area's residences are owner-occupied. Land Use The Route 288 Corridor planning area consists mostly of agricultural uses and vacant land. Land use data was gathered from an existing database of County real estate tax records and field surveys. There DRAFT RT3 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan are 526 parcels in the planning area. The combined area of those parcels is approximately 6,943 acres; 2.4 percent of Chesterfield County's 285,702 total acres. Large Tracts: There are thirty-three (33) parcels that each exceed fifty (50) acres, and combined account for about 5,022 acres or 72 percent of the planning area's acreage. Approximately 67 percent of these parcels are zoned for agriculture and approximately 72 percent are currently vacant or used for agriculture. These tracts are located throughout the area and present opportunities for future large scale development projects. Existing Zoning: The zoning of property determines the uses that are allowed on that land. For example, property that is zoned for residential land uses will have a zoning category that begins with R. The number following the R represents the required lot size for the category (R-7 requires a minimum 7,000 square foot lot, R-9 requires a minimum 9,000 square foot lot and so on). Agricultural (A) zoning allows large lot residential uses and farm uses. It may also be the zoning category for land that has not yet been zoned to another category for development. Table 1 shows a breakdown of zoning categories for the Route 288 planning area. As shown in the table, the majority of the land in the planning area is currently zoned A. The few office and commercially zoned areas are primarily Table 1 Zoning Analysis Percentages given are rounded. Zoning Acres Pct. A (Agricultural) 4,900 71% R-7 (Residential) 481 7% R-9 921 13% R-15 177 3% R-25 33 0% 0-2 (Office) 149 2% C-2 (Commercial) 3 0% C-3 75 1% I-1 (Light Industry) 204 3% Rt. 288 Study Area 6,943 100% Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department located along Midlothian Turnpike with a concentration just before the Powhatan County line. Most of the industrial zoning is in the Sommerville development located on Midlothian Turnpike. Table 2 Approved Future/Adjacent Developments Because most of the existing zoning in this area was zoned through a Conditional Use Planned Development, specific uses allowed may not be reflected through the underlying zoning category. Name Zoning and Acreage per Category Comment Acropolis 69 CenterPointe 947 Charter Colony 822 Greensprings 1,313 The Grove 440 0-2 R-7 (330.7), R-15 (18.8), R-MFfTH (91), C-3 (41), O-2 (400) R-9 (770.5), R-15 (115.9) C-3 (3.6) R-9 (1044.7), 0-2 (268) R-9 (102.5), R-12 (132.8), R-TH (60.1), R-MF (21.3), O-2 (16.6), C-3 (56.7) Sommerville 140 I-1 Waterford 243 I-1 (190.5), R-MF (31), C-1 (21.5) Mixed -Use development allowing office and commercial uses. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office and commercial uses. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office, and commercial uses. This development also includes the Midlothian campus of John Tyler Community College. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office and commercial uses. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office, commercial, outdoor recreational, and public/semi-public uses. Mixed-Use development allowing residential, office, light industrial and commercial uses. Mixed-Use development allowing office, light industrial, and limited commercial uses. Source: Chesterfield County Planning Department Approved Area Developments: There are seven (7) major approved developments in, or immediately adjacent to, the planning area and near the proposed extension of Route 288 (see Map B). These seven (7) developments are Acropolis, CenterPointe, Charter Colony, Greensprings, The DRAFT RT4 4/22/99 Virginia Revised Draft (Map B) APPROVED AREA DEVELOPMENTS ~ Watkins I''''1 Nurseries Note: The boundaries shown are approximate and for general reference only. Ivymont Square Charter Colon Charter Colony College Charter Colony Mldlothtan Midlothian Village Queensmill Prepared by the - Chesterfield County Planning Department November, 1998 No ScaJe -- -- Brendermill THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Grove, Sommerville and Waterford. All of these projects have seen limited development or have not begun to develop. Land Use Analysis This land use analysis reviewed the existing use of property in the Route 288 planning area in 1998 (see Map C). It does not analyze what the land is zoned or what the property is designated for in the future. Undeveloped and Agricultural Land: This category includes vacant land and agricultural uses as well as residential uses on parcels ten (10) acres or greater. It accounts for 200 parcels and 6,285 acres, approximately 90 percent of the total acreage in the planning area. These parcels vary in size and are located throughout the planning area. Most of the land is zoned for agricultural or residential uses. Table 3 Existing Land Use Percentages given are rounded. Land Use Acres Percentage Undeveloped and 6,285 90% Agricultural Residential 445 6% Commercial 107 2% Industrial\Office 81 1% Public\Semi-Public 24 1% Total 6,943 100% Source: Chestedield County Planning Department Residential: This includes all parcels currently used for homes on less than ten (10) acres. Residential land uses comprise 445 acres (6.4 percent) of the planning area. Approximately one-third of the residences are scattered on agriculturally zoned parcels of less than ten (10) acres in size. The remaining are in residential neighborhoods. Currently there are three (3) neighborhoods in the area: Huguenot Ridge, located on Huguenot Springs Road; Buckingham Manor, on Otterdale Road; and Otterdale, also on Otterdale Road. Huguenot Ridge has thirty (30) approved lots, six (6) of which have been developed. Buckingham Manor has developed thirteen (13) of its eighteen (18) approved lots, while Otterdale Subdivision has developed 137 of its 140 approved lots. Commercial: Commercial uses account for approximately 1.5 percent of the planning area's land use (107 acres). These uses are located along Midlothian Turnpike. The primary commercial uses are Watkins Nursery and Windy Hill Sports Complex. Watkins Nursery grows and sells plants for landscaping purposes and plans to relocate before the construction of Route 288. Windy Hill Sports Complex is on the west-bound side of Midlothian Turnpike just past Huguenot Springs Road. The complex has batting cages, miniature golf, a driving range and has recently added a nine-hole golf course. Industrial: Industrial and office land uses account for 1.2 percent or eighty-one (81) acres of the planning area's uses. These uses include the Sommerville Industrial and Office Park and a Virginia Power substation on Dry Bridge Road, one-half mile south of Midlothian Turnpike. It has several high voltage transmission wires leading to it through several properties. · Public/Semi Public: See Public Facilities on page RT 7. Environmental Factors In guiding future land use decisions in the planning area, environmental features should be considered. Swift Creek Reservoir Watershed: The portion of the planning area south of Midlothian Turnpike is located in this 41,950 acre watershed and contains two (2) of the nine (9) major tributaries that drain to the Swift Creek Reservoir. Located west of Route 288 between Route 360 and Genito Road, the Swift Creek Reservoir covers 1,700 acres. One of Chesterfield County's three (3) principal water sources, it produces approximately eight (8) million gallons of drinking water per day for 30 percent of County citizens. The Reservoir also functions as a recreational and aesthetic resource for residents of DRAFT RT5 4/22/99 F'~ Residential ~ Commercial ~ Industrial ~ Public/Semi-Public ~ Vacant/Agricultural Draft (Map C) r Rt. 288 Corridor Plan / ~;.o.~,..,*.~.*~ Study A~a. Bour~da. ry No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department June, 1998 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan surrounding areas. At this time, the Reservoir's overall water quality is good. However, only a small portion of the Reservoir's watershed, approximately 12 percent, is developed. The remainder of the large watershed area has been recommended by County plans for significant future growth. Without adequate management, such growth could result in the generation of large amounts of nutrients and pollutants on the Reservoir. These could cause taste and odor problems in the treated water, excessive algae blooms and depleted oxygen levels, affecting fish and other aquatic organisms, the aesthetic value of the Reservoir and its viability as a drinking water supply. Further, nutrients and pollution in the Reservoir may have an economic impact as well. As water quality decreases, the cost of treatment can increase. To address all of these concerns, in 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Watershed Manaqement Plan for the area. The Watershed Manaqement Plan includes an in-lake phosphorous limit and establishes measures such as a reduced phosphorous standard for new residential development and the construction of regional Best Management Practice(BMP) basins to filter pollutants to meet this limit. Watershed Standards and The Route 288 Corridor Plan: Early in the planning process, citizens expressed concern about the continued health of the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir. Their concerns focused on higher intensity uses that may be allowed as a result of this Plan. ~'' ~-'~- * ....... ..... ,,.. ,.~ *h;~ ,.-...,~,.,;.,,. ,-~. ..... ,~ *"-.* *~.,- '-,,-,~ ...... .";*~,--.*~ ..... *i,-;..-,f.-,.~ by *~.i.- ~,-.,. would rccu!t The Environmental En,qineerin.q Department has contracted with a consultant to update the land uses in the Water Qualiht model used by the County and the Countys Watershed Manaqement Committee to reflect the recommended land uses in The Route 288 Corridor Plan. In coniunction with citizens, the results of this study will be reviewed and may be implemented into The Route 288 Corridor Plan. Topography and Soils: The topography of the planning area consists principally of flatlands and rolling hills typical of the Piedmont physiographic region. Soils in the planning area can be characterized as moderately to well drained. There are some areas, however, that are characterized by clayey or hydric soils, which do not drain well. DRAFT RT6 4,,2.2/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Existing Regulations to Protect the Reservoir: The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act, Upper Swift Creek, Floodplain and Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinances are the regulations that limit the amount of pollutants entering the Reservoir from both non-residential and residential growth. As ~ ................................. r- ........... ,,,~ ,"ece~ cdo ~d ~Al.-s~-....~-I~,-...,I..~.~,~.,~ ,R~?.~..~O,,,-~,O,,.;,i' ...................................- stringent ~..,w..,~,.~~A~'~h ...... ~..,,..,.+~a~"a ~.~, ....... ,,... dcvelcpment and Existing Regulations to Protect Streams: The two (2) measures to protect the streams are the County's Erosion and Sediment Control and Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinances. The first Ordinance limits the amount of sediment that is allowed to enter a stream during construction activities. The second Ordinance establishes Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) adjacent to perennial streams. The establishment of RPAs is intended to ensure an adequate buffer between environmental resources (such as wetlands and streams) and development. RPAs reduce and filter the pollutants in stormwater runoff. The RPA boundaries in the watershed were established by delineating an area measured from the limits of the 100 year floodplain where available or from the edge of hydric soils. As it is currently written, the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act Ordinance allows these RPA areas to be reduced by permitting the area to be "redelineated" by measuring the area from field-delineated wetlands rather than the floodplain. In most cases, these redelineations result in a reduction in the RPA, thus affording less protection for the streams. Further, 100 year floodplain areas adjacent to non-perennial streams can be cleared. Public Facilities Facilities: There are no parks, schools, fire or rescue stations currently located in the planning area boundaries. However, the County's 1995 Public Facilities Plan recommends construction of an elementary school in the southeastern part of the planning area by the year 2015. A community park and a fire station are also planned within the planning area. John Tyler Community College: John Tyler Community College-Northern Branch will be located in the southwestern quadrant of the intersection of Charter Colony Parkway and Woolridge Road Extended. Public WaterAiVastewater Systems Existing Water and Wastewater Systems: The use of public water and wastewater systems is currently recommended for ail development within The Upper Swift Creek Plan. Provisions of the County Code and conditions of zoning, tentative subdivision and/or site plan approval may require the use of public systems. Due to the variability of construction costs and other factors, specific water and wastewater line extensions needed for future development should be discussed far in advance with the Utilities Department. Information relating to water and wastewater infrastructure may be found in The Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan. The planning area is served by several large water mains, a twenty-four (24) inch line along Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) and a twenty-four (24) inch line along Coalfield Road. The area is DRAFT RT7 4/22J99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan also served by an existing water tank at Huguenot Springs Road. That portion of the planning area located south of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a sixty (60) inch wastewater trunk along Genito Road, the Upper Swift Creek wastewater pumping station and the Bailey's Bridge pumping station. An eighteen (18) to twenty-seven (27) inch wastewater trunk along Little Tomahawk Creek has been extended to serve the John Tyler Community College-Northern Campus and adjacent properties. That portion of the planning area located north of Midlothian Turnpike is served by a twenty-one (21) to thirty (30) inch wastewater trunk along Michaux Creek and by the Michaux Creek wastewater pumping station. These two (2) facilities are supported by a thirty/thirty-six (30/36) inch wastewater trunk located along the James River. That area of the Plan bordered by Midlothian Turnpike, Huguenot Springs Road and the Chesterfleld/Powhatan County line cannot be served by a direct gravity line extension from the Michaux Creek system. The topography of this area dictates that it naturally drains west toward Powhatan County and would require the construction of a sm:all pumping station to access the public wastewater system. Existing facilities are sized to provide capacity consistent with those land uses reflected in the Plan. Should more intense land uses be pursued which would be considered heavy water users and wastewater generators, detailed analyses may be necessary to address impact on the existing public water and wastewater systems. Future Water and Wastewater Systems: The County's long-standing policy "Growth Pays For Growth," as reflected in the County's Upper Swift Creek Plan is applicable in the Route 288 Corridor planning area as well. Unless the construction of a new facility is undertaken by the County (including upgrading of pumping stations and construction of water tanks) to address system reliability or water quality concerns, the majority of future water and wastewater facilities depicted on the County's Water and Wastewater Facilities Plan are anticipated to be constructed by private development interests. Current County policies may provide some rebating of construction costs to developers for off-site extensions and line over-sizing. Development within the planning area will require the extension of major water mains as well as smaller lines to serve specific sites. Mcjcr" .......... ,~ ;,,,.,,,~,, ~.;v,~,, t~m ;..~, .,,,.~ ~. .... ,,, ~ .... The extension of major wastewater trunks, as well as sub-trunks, and collector lines will be required for development within the planning area. Mcjcr .......... ] ........... ] ........ ~ .......................... ~ ......... ~ ..................... ~ ...... ~ The proposed new and expanded facJli~es are sized to meet the capacJ~ requirements anticipated by those land uses reflected Jn the Plan. However, should more intense uses be pumued which would require much higher water demands and generate much higher levels of wastewater flows, detailed analyses may be necessa~ to address system capacJ~ issues. These analyses would need to address the abili~ of current water sources and treatment plant sites to meet these potential higher demands and flows. DRAFT RT8 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Transportation Existing Conditions: Much of the Route 288 Corridor is served by two-lane roads, such as Huguenot Springs Road, Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road and Coalfield Road. Charter Colony Parkway, a new two- lane facility, was recently completed from the vicinity of Midlothian High School south to Coalfield Road. Midlothian Turnpike (Route 60) is the major East/West road in the Corridor and is a four-lane highway with a median. Traffic signats are located at its intersections with Old Hundred Road and Otterdale Road. The following are average daily traffic volumes on some of the major roads in the corridor: Midlothian Turnpike, west of Winterfield Road Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School Coalfield Road between Queensmill and the YMCA Huguenot Springs Road Mount Hermon Road between Old Hundred and Hallsboro Roads Old Hundred Road between Dry Bridge and Otterdale Roads Otterdale Road between Midlothian Turnpike and Otterdale Road 23,465 (1997) 2,615 (1997) 15,370 (1997) 1,160 (1996) 340 (1996) 4,260 (1997) 2,150 (1997) Coalfield Road, which originates in the Village of Midlothian and is the primary north/south traffic carrying facility in the Corridor, is the only road that is currently operating at capacity. A Norfolk Southern rail-line runs east and west through the Corridor, south of and parallel to Midlothian Turnpike. According to the Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT's) Rail and Public Transportation section, this line carries two (2) trains per day. The design of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway through the Corridor to the northern County line has been completed. Ultimately, Route 288 in the Corridor area will be a four (4) lane, interstate-style limited access facility with interchanges located at Lucks Lane/Centre Pointe Parkway, Woolridge Road Extended and Midlothian Turnpike. Collector/Distributor (C/D) roads will be provided throughout most of the Corridor. These CID roads will run parallel to the mainline lanes and will allow vehicles entering and exiting Route 288 to do so without interfering with mainline traffic. The initial phases of construction will result in a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. Right-of-way acquisition is currently underway. First phase construction of the section between the Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled to begin in the Fall of 1998. First phase construction of the section north of Midlothian Turnpike is scheduled for the Spring of 2000. In 1989, the Board of Supervisors adopted a County-wide Thorouqhfare Plan. Changes to the 1989 Thorouqhfare Plan will be necessary due to the Route 288 project and approved development in the area. Other Road Projects In The Route 288 Corridor Area: In addition to Route 288, the following are other road projects in or adjacent to the Route 288 Corridor: Old Hundred Road - Between Dry Bridge Road and Otterdale Road, Old Hundred Road has narrow travel lanes and inadequate shoulders. This project will reconstruct two (2) lanes to provide adequate travel lane and shoulder widths and will improve vertical and horizontal alignments where necessary. Although this project is in the current Six Year Construction Plan, construction funds have not been allocated. DRAFT RT9 4,/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan 2. Woolridqe Road Extended - A short section of Woolridge Road Extended has been completed connecting Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian High School, with Coalfield Road at the YMCA. A further extension of Woolridge Road will connect Coalfield Road at the YMCA with Midlothian Turnpike, east of the Village of Midlothian, at the existing intersection of Midlothian Turnpike with Walton Park Road and Old Buckingham Road. When completed, this road will provide a southern Midlothian bypass and should divert a significant volume of traffic from the section of Midlothian Turnpike that passes through the Village of Midlothian. Construction is underway and should be completed by Fall 1999. 3. Charter Colony Parkway - To improve access to Midlothian High School and the future John Tyler Community College campus, westbound dual left-turn lanes and a traffic signal will be installed at the Midlothian Turnpike/Charter Colony Parkway intersection. Additional lanes will be constructed on Charter Colony Parkway, south of Midlothian Turnpike and across the frontage of Midlothian High School, to provide left-turn lanes at school entrances. Construction of this project is anticipated to begin in 1998. Historic Resources This area of Chesterfield County has many significant historical structures (see Map D). Most are still in use today and have been well preserved. Information on historic resources was taken from Jeffrey O'Dell's 1983 book, Chesterfield County: Early Architecture and Historic Sites. The following list of historic sites includes all of those inventoried in the book which are still existing in the planning area. All of these structures are located near Midlothian Turnpike and are part of what was a small hamlet which centered around Hallsborough Tavern. Bethel Baptist Church (100 Huguenot Springs Road): This structure was erected in 1894 behind Hallsborough Tavern and is the only nineteenth century brick church in Chesterfield County. The building is a Gothic Revival structure with a steep, gable roof sheathed in slate. Chapel Hill (194 Huguenot Springs Road): Built in 1903 by Dr. W. D. Sydnor, this house is a central passage plan I-house featuring a front-cross gable, interior end brick chimneys and octagonal-roofed turrets. DRAFT RTl 0 4/22/99 Revised Draft (Map D) Rt. 288 Corridor Plan i Study Area Boundary N No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield County Planning Department November, 1998 Bethel Baptist Church Chapel Hill Hallsboro Tavern Mt. Sinai Baptist Church & Cemetary THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Hallsborough Tavern (16300 Midlothian Turnpike): This structure was originally built by James Howard around 1810 to serve as a tavern and retail store. The next owner, Austin Spears, added a two story wing in 1832 to accommodate guests. This structure eventually served as the area's post office. This building has been altered several times since its original construction. Currently, it is being used for retail purposes. Mount Sinai Baptist Church (200 Old Hundred Road): Erected in 1884, this was the first church built to serve the area's African-American community. Construction funds were raised from donations and festivals. The original structure underwent major remodeling in 1948 and again in 1969. Land Character Types Based on field surveys, information provided by County Departments, maps of existing land use, the location of significant water bodies and Chesapeake Bay Resource Protection Areas, a character type inventory of the planning area was conducted as a means of classifying land areas (see Map E). Four (4) character types depict the visual environment of the planning area. Below are the character types, their definitions and significance to the area. · Forested Description: Managed forests and natural wooded areas which include a mix of pine and hardwood. Si.qnificance: Forest land is significant both environmentally and aesthetically. Environmentally, forests protect the soil, produce oxygen, provide opportunities for recreation and play a role in a variety of natural environmental systems. Forested land contributes to the rural and natural "feel" of an area and may buffer different land uses from one another. · Agriculture and Open Space Description: Cropland, open fields, pastures and recreational areas. SiRnificance: Agricultural land uses are particularly significant to the visual quality and ambiance of an area because of the seasonal changes and variety. The textures and colors of the open fields are particularly attractive from rural roadways, especially in areas with rolling terrain. · Residential Description: Subdivisions are a grouping of suburban type housing linked by a planned road network and are marked with an identifiable entrance. Strip residential development consists of homes located along roadways, generally fronting arterials and collectors in a linear configuration. DRAFT RTl 1 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Significance: Although the planning area remains relatively undeveloped, consisting of only three (3) neighborhoods, growth is expected to occur in the next few years as the completion of Route 288 nears. Office, Commercial and Industrial Description: Most of these uses in the planning area, which includes Watkins Nursery, are rural, family-owned businesses or are buffered and blend in with the character of the surrounding area. The exception to this is the Virginia Power substation which is significantly screened from view by forested areas. Significance: Currently, these uses account for a very small portion of the development in the planning area. However, upon the completion of Route 288 and other transportation improvements, these types of uses are expected to increase and become dominant in the area. DRAFT RTl2 4/22/99 Revised Draft (Map E) 288 Corridor Plan Character Type Map Forested Agricultural/Open Space Office/Commercial/Industrial No Scale Prepared by the Chesterfield C~3unty Planning Depar[mem January 11, 1999 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES The completion of Route 288 from the Powhite Parkway to Interstate 64 will greatly accelerate development activity in all of northwest Chesterfield County and throughout the region. Not only will this new highway open up access to a relatively undeveloped part of Chesterfield, it will provide a direct link across the James River to Goochland County's West Creek Business Park, home of the proposed Motorola semiconductor plant and western Henrico's business district. Effective planning in this area will assure that, as growth occurs, it is properly guided, taking advantage of a prime opportunity for needed economic development, while maintaining environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. Chesterfield and The Metropolitan Region's Economy Chesterfield County has historically been a "bedroom community" for the Richmond metropolitan area, providing a greater proportion of places to live than places to work. This has a large fiscal impact on the County, since the cost of providing services to residential development is greater than what it pays the County in taxes (see Chart 2). Business revenue to the County provides most of the additional funds necessary to provide residential services. Therefore, a balance between economic development and $1,165 Chart 2 Share of Cost of County Services Per Chesterfield Household .$642 · Taxes Paid by Household rlTaxes Paid by Business · Other Sources $1,930 residential growth is important. Source: Chesterfield County Budget Department In 1997, the Chesterfield Planning Department analyzed the County's Comprehensive Plan to determine the number of acres that should be recommended for office and industrial use to meet long-range economic goals for the County. This analysis compared the County's existing share of the region's economic base and the amount of land recommended for office and industrial use in the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Using a moderate level growth forecast covering the period to 2044, the analysis identified a land use plan deficit of approximately 2,250 acres of land recommended for industry and 4,350 acres of land recommended for office use, totaling 6,600 additional acres necessary, but not yet designated for, office and industrial uses in the County's adopted Plans. Jobs and Location Chesterfield needs more businesses to balance residential growth and provide quality jobs for its citizens. Not all jobs are created equal; attracting "basic sector" jobs, like those associated with corporate offices and light industry, will be. of greater benefit to the citizens of Chesterfield County. These jobs are higher paying, with better benefits, and generate spin-off employment in other economic sectors, such as retail and service. Quality jobs are especially important in the Route 288 Corridor planning area, as most of Chesterfield's workers live in the northwestern part of the County and most of Chesterfield's major employers are in the eastern part of Chesterfield. DRAFT RTl 3 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor P/an Timing of Development Typically, the demand for residential construction in highway corridors precedes the market for corporate office and light industrial uses. This area is ~ anticipated to have residential demand due to the development of employment centers at West Creek ~ in Goochland, large employment centers in western Henrico and a scarcity of land designated for residential development in Goochland and Henrico. With the construction of Route 288, Chesterfield County will only be a short commute over the new James River bridge. There may also be interest in retail development along Midlothian Turnpike, as businesses consider the potential of attracting commuters from Route 288. However, commercial development is already developed nearby at Chesterfield Towne Center, with additional space already planned and zoned at the Route 288/$60 interchange area and east and west of rvlidlothian Village. Planning and Design Issues The future design and configuration of development in the Route 288 corridor is critical to Chesterfield County. Well-planned and constructed development, consolidated and coordinated to the maximum extent possible, will promote a stronger tax base, an aesthetically pleasing environment and the cost effective provision of County services. Most quality, large-scale suburban office and light industrial development in the Richmond region is found in "corporate parks," such as the Arboretum and the Boulders off Midlothian Turnpike in Chesterfield County, Innsbrook in Richmond's west end and the new West Creek Corporate Park in eastern Goochland County. Common to these developments are basic features that characterize good design and planning including generous landscaping, well designed entrances, use of curbs and gutters along streets, a mix of building heights, effective lighting and parking. Many of these corporate centers have their own strict development standards but, at the same time, incorporate enough flexibility to accommodate market demand. In many cases, a combination of local zoning requirements, improvements proffered by the center's developer at the time of rezoning and deed covenants established by the developer combine to ensure good design and planning. Well-designed corporate centers play an important part in the success of attracting desirable economic development in a regionally and nationally competitive environment. Haphazard and incremental commercial development, especially industrial uses characterized by prefabricated metal buildings, inadequate landscaping and outside storage visible from public areas, can be detrimental to attracting new businesses to an area. Another important factor to successful corporate park design is finding parcels of land large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Property owners interested in developing their land DRAFT RTl4 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan often find it is more profitable to group together a number of smaller adjacent parcels into one (1) significant holding. When the market is right, this approach can attract quality, large-scale corporate park development and discourage the piecemeal commercial "stripping" of development along major highways. Where practical and appropriate, the design of commercial uses can incorporate elements from nearby historic buiidings, creating a common area theme that helps contribute to community continuity. Effective design also takes into consideration adjacent land character types. DRAFT RTl 5 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan A PLAN FOR ACTION L Goals The vision of the Route 288 Corridor Plan is to effectively guide future development in a way that promotes maximum benefit to Chesterfield County's current and future citizens, while recognizing the importance of property rights, healthy neighborhoods, environmental preservation and the County's high quality of life. The goals listed below foster this vision and establish a framework for the Plan's more specific recommendations. A. Basic Principles 1. Recognize the prime importance of the Route 288 Corridor to Chesterfield County's economic future. 2. Take advantage of the benefits to Chesterfield County that Route 288 will have as a primary component of the region's transportation system. 3. Chart a future for the area that takes into account both the interests of the current community and the long-term welfare of all Chesterfield citizens. B. Orderly Growth 1. Guide each type of development to the most appropriate area by following the County's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Discourage development that may be detrimental to long-term economic and environmental goals. 3. Minimize the cost of public facilities by promoting orderly and efficient development. 4. Only approve development proposals supported by public utilities. C. Transportation 1. Provide a safe, efficient and cost-effective transportation system. 2. Control development densities within the Corridor so that smooth flow of traffic is provided on Route 288 and on major arterial and collector streets. 3. Provide for the construction of additional major arterial and collector streets as development occurs to mitigate the increase in traffic generated by development in the Corridor. 4. Properly locate and limit the number of access points to major arterial and collector streets. 5. Encourage pedestrian activity at appropriate locations in the Corridor. D. Economic Opportunities 1. Maximize the economic development potential of the Route 288 Corridor as a prime location for basic sector employment, such as corporate office and light industrial uses. 2. Take advantage of the potential for spin-off economic development from other major employment centers in the region, especially those opportunities for high-tech industry and corporate office centers. 3. Work to provide more basic sector jobs closer to the population centers in northern Chesterfield County. 4. Identify large parcels that are suitable for industrial development. 5. Protect sites identified for industrial use from encroaching residential and retail development. 6. Identify and market parcels appropriate for economic development. E. Resource Protection 1. Maintain the environmental quality of the area. DRAFT RTl6 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan 2. Protect water quality in the Upper Swift Creek Reservoir watershed, as well as in the area's perennial and non-perennial streams. 3. Encourage development to accommodate and preserve existing landscape where possible. 4. Protect historic resources in the area by promoting historic designation of identified structures and encouraging development to preserve historic structures. F. Housing 1. Promote housing development that wilt meet the needs of future residents and businesses. 2. Where residential development is appropriate, strive for a mix of housing options that will complement the County's economic development initiatives. G. Community Character and Design 1. Enhance the aesthetic quality of the area through quality design. 2. Encourage public safety through the effective design of development. 3. Encourage development design that promotes community character. II. Recommendations The following recommendations are the specific actions required to carry out the Route 288 Corridor Plan. These recommendations, combined with the land use plan that follows, will help guide the future of the Route 288 Corridor area. However, these recommendations will require cooperation between businesses, industries, residents and government to make them successful. A. Land Use 1. Land Use Plan: Follow the land use recommendations of the Route 288 Corridor Plan (Alternative B} to guide future decision making. Aggregation: Through the zoning process, encourage owners interested in selling smaller land parcels in the Route 288 Corridor to join with adjacent property owners to aggregate land holdings large enough to accommodate a large-scale plan of development. Incompatible Uses: Residential land uses should be discouraged in areas designated for non- residential areas in this Plan (areas designated for light industrial, office or commercial land uses) and vice versa, except where those uses are permitted by right. B. Quality Design Large-Scale Development: Encourage large-scale development projects of quality design which follow an office park-planned development approach (i.e., Arboretum, Moorefield, Boulders). These projects should also include an internal road network and controlled access. Design Standards: Adopt amendments to the County's Design Standards Manual creating an overlay district for the Route 288 Corridor Plan area in all Regional Employment Center land use areas (see Map F) which would: a) Increase landscaping required in front and corner setbacks for new development. b) Require curb and gutter in all new developments. c) Allow building heights of up to 150 feet. d) Require new development adjacent to Route 288 to orient buildings so that the views of buildings from Route 288 will not be of loading docks, storage areas, etc. e) Require developers to design attractive wet ponds for Best Management Practices (BMPs) that can be incorporated into developments as amenities. DRAFT RTl7 4~99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan f) Enhance requirements for quality architecture. g) Require developments in I-2 Districts to pave their parking lots. h) Limit outdoor storage uses in I-2 Districts. i) Encourage pedestrian access in and around projects and a plan for linking pedestrian access to adjacent properties. 3. Safety: All development proposals should be designed to accommodate public safety needs. Urban Design: The area closest to the Route 288/60 interchange may be appropriate for an urban or neo-traditional scaled and designed development. This concept may include reduced setbacks, formal landscaping, pedestrian access, superior architectural design and other features that are representative of this urban or neo-traditional design. A quality development of this type could be submitted and processed through the County's CUPD (Conditional Use Planned Development) process. C. Economic Growth Proactive Zoning: Because of the economic development opportunities available in this area, not present in other areas of the County, there may be situations where the County would like to encourage development. Additional study of proactive rezoning should be conducted following the adoption of The Route 288 Corridor Plan. 2. Opportunity: The Department of Economic Development should continue to identify prime sites in the area and pursue proven developers to build quality office and business parks. Jobs: The Department of Economic Development should determine which types of economic activities (i.e., corporate and divisional headquarters, research and development, light manufacturing, distribution, back office operations, office/office showroom, etc.) will create the best job opportunities (payroll) for County citizens and generate significant tax revenues to Chesterfield County and pursue those uses for the Route 288 planning area. Marketing: The Economic Development Department should develop and implement a marketing plan to capitalize on location advantages of the Route 288 Corridor, such as its proximity to workers, John Tyler Community College, major roads and Motorola's West Creek Campus. D. Public Facilities Utilities Study: A detailed utilities study should be undertaken to address possible demand/capacity issues, if uses are pursued that are more intense than those reflected by the Plan. 2. WaterNVastewater Ordinance: The County should adopt an Ordinance for this area requiring mandatory hook-up to County water and wastewater at the time of development. 3. Policing Office: As the surrounding communities grow and develop, an appropriate location for a policing office should be identified and permitted in a central, strategic location. 4. Fire/Rescue Facility: A fire/rescue station is planned within the area of Midlothian Turnpike and Route 288 to meet the existing and future demands for service and response time standards. E. Transportation 1. Thorouqhfare Plan: Amend the County's Thorou,qhfare Plan in the Route 288 Corridor, as shown on Map F, and use the amended Plan as the guide for transportation recommendations on development proposals. DRAFT RTl 8 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Mitigating Road Improvements: Development proposals within the Corridor should provide mitigating road improvements, to include right-of-way dedication, construction of turn lanes. installation of traffic signalization and shoulder improvements. Access to Arterial and Collector Roads: Through the zoning, site plan .review and subdivision review processes, control access to major arterial and collector roads through shared access, adequate access separation and traffic control devices to maintain orderly and efficient traffic flow. 4. Traffic Noise Abatement: Provide setbacks for future sound-sensitive land uses, such as residential development along Route 288, to reduce traffic noise impacts. 5. Pedestrian Access: Develop a network of sidewalks, in accordance with the County's Sidewalk Policy, to provide for pedestrian travel. Route 288 Funding: The funds that have been allocated for the Route 288 project will provide a four (4) lane facility between Powhite Parkway and Midlothian Turnpike and a two (2) lane facility north of Midlothian Turnpike. The County should aggressively pursue completion of Route 288. F, Environmental Resources Vegetation: Through the zoning process, encourage developers to disturb as little landscape and plant life as possible around the entrances and fringes of the project area and bodies of water to preserve the area's environmental character and the natural erosion and pollutant controls provided by the undisturbed vegetation. '3 2. Regional BMPs: If development does take place on a site that is expected to be served by a regional BMP facility, staff will assist the developer in identifying a regional site and will attempt to facilitate discussions among the developer and other landowners for a regional facility. However, staff will not require a regional facility unless the developer and other landowners agree on a voluntary regional approach. If such an agreement is not reached, the developer will be required to provide a BMP facility for his own site. D~FT RTl 9 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan G. Housing and Community 1. Housing Types: Evaluate whether revisions to the County's residential zoning ordinances would encourage a mix of housing options for new workers, complementing the County's economic development initiatives. H. Historic Resources Preserve Structures: Bethel Baptist Church and Hallsborough Tavern, historic structures, should be preserved. Any adjacent development is encouraged to be architecturally compatible. Historic Area: Create an area around Bethel Baptist Church and Hallsborough Tavern, as shown on Map F. Any development in this area is encouraged to incorporate the design characteristics of these historic structures to preserve the historic character of the area. The goal of this area is to maintain the sense of place at this intersection created by Hallsborough Tavern and Bethel Baptist Church: a) On the north side of Midlothian Turnpike, development is encouraged to incorporate design features from the existing historic properties, including building scale, architectural design and texture. Further, development in this area is encouraged to incorporate pedestrian access and sidewalks. b) On the south side of Midlothian Turnpike, properties adjacent to Midlothian Turnpike are encouraged to be similar in scale and architecture to Hallsborough Tavern and Chapel Hill. Development in the remainder of this portion of the historic district may be larger in scale but not overwhelming to the smaller-scale development. Historic Designations: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should work with the property owners of Bethel Baptist Church and Chapel Hill to have these properties designated as County historic landmarks. Historic and Cultural Significance: The Chesterfield County Preservation Committee should recognize Mount Sinai Baptist Church and Cemetery for their historic and cultural significance to the County, including a plaque at the site explaining the story and significance of the church and initiate steps to designate it as a historic landmark. IlL The Land Use Plan The land use plan for the Route 288 Corridor is a guide for future change. The land use plan illustrates the recommended future development pattern for the Route 288 Corridor area (see Map F). This map will be a useful guide for the future land use and rezoning decisions. Land use categories, their definitions and key features of recommended uses are presented in Chart 3. Successfully implemented, this land use plan will: · Target key land in the northwestern part of Chesterfield County for office, light industrial and corporate park uses; in turn, strengthening the County's tax base and providing new employment opportunities. Promote a land use development pattern that takes best advantage of Route 288's links to the region's transportation system while, at the same time, providing effective transition between new uses and adjacent communities. DRAFT RT20 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan The land use plan offers guidance to County staff, elected officials and citizens as new development proposals are brought forward and evaluated. For example, if a landowner is interested in developing his vacant property, which is currently zoned for Agricultural (A) uses, the land use plan will be consulted by staff as they determine their recommendation for the rezoning. If the rezoning request does not comply with the land use designation on the land use plan, staff is not likely to recommend approval of the request. Generally, the land use plan does not recommend changes to the zoning of any land. However, as outlined in the land use recommendations, if the Board of Supervisors chooses to rezone property in this area, this land use plan will be used as a guide. D RAFT RT21 4/22/99 THE PLAN FOR CHESTERFIELD The Route 288 Corridor Plan Chart 3 LAND USE CATEGORIES The categories shown on Map F are described below. Because land use plans are a general guide for recommended future growth, all uses that could possibly be developed cannot be listed here. More detailed information on potential uses can be found in the corresponding categories (i.e., 0-2) of the Chesterfield County Zoning Ordinance. · Residential (One (1) dwelling or less per acre): Residences, and under certain circumstances, places of worship, schools, parks and other similar public facilities. · Office/Residential Mixed Use: Professional and administrative offices (0-2), residential developments of varying densities, and light industry (I-1). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Office: Professional and administrative offices (0-2). Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Convenience Commercial (not shown on Plan): Limited retail, service and office uses (C-1 and O-1) mainly serving nearby neighborhoods or rural locations, generally located at the intersection of through streets (the intersection of two (2) collectors or a collector and an arterial as designated in the Thorouqhfare Plan/, provided adequate spacing is provided. In developing areas, they should be planned in conjunction with new residential projects. · Neighborhood Mixed Use: Neighborhood-oriented commercial uses (C-2), including small shopping centers. · Light Industrial/Flex: Offices, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1 and some I-2 uses), including research and development uses as well as flex space. Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. · Regional Employment Center: Office, research and development uses, warehouses and light industrial uses (I-1). Moderate industrial uses may be appropriate in some locations if appropriate access, buffering and Iand use transitions are provided. Under certain circumstances, supporting small-scale, retail uses may be incorporated into a larger development. Midlothian Area Community Land Use And Transportation Plan: The shaded area on Map F shows recommended land uses from this Plan, as adopted in 1989 and amended in 1992. It is shown here for information purposes only and is not recommended for revision. · Residential Medium Density (1.01 to 2.5 units/acre): Housing types will be predominantly single family detached units and may also include schools and playgrounds, places of worship and isolated neighborhood service uses. · Planned Transition Area: This area is appropriate for mixed-use development that contributes to an overall transition to a smaller-scale, pedestrian-oriented environment in Midlothian Village. Primary uses will include office, medium-density housing (7-14 units/acre), personal services and community facilities. · Suburban Commercial District: Suburban, auto-oriented design district to include retail shopping centers, office-service establishments and similar uses. Note 2: A regional scale high fashion mall or lifestyle center can be appropriate at this quadrant if: · integrated with the regional employment center uses, · the majority of the anchor stores serve a metropolitan-wide market. Neighborhood retail uses may be appropriate if integrated with the other designated uses. DRAFT RT22 4/22/99 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8 .A. Subject: Appointment and Confirmation of Two Citizens to the Richmond First Tee Board of Directors County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Appointment and confirmation of two citizens to the Richmond First Tee Board of Directors. Summary of Information: The lease between the County and Richmond First Tee to construct and operate a golf course for youth at Ironbridge Park provides that the Board of Supervisors must appoint a citizen member to First Tee's Board of Directors and confirm a second citizen from Chesterfield to be appointed by Richmond First Tee. The County Administrator is already a member of the Board of Directors. Members of the Board of Directors oversee the operations of First Tee and serve for three year terms. Staff.recommends that the Board confirm either Darcy Oman or Lester George as current members of the Richmond First Tee Board. Ms. Oman is President of the C~ndation, a non-profit philanthropic organization and lives in the Midlothian District and Lester George owns an architectural firm and lives in the Matoaca District. Ms. Oman and Mr. George will remain members of the First Tee Board if they are not confirmed. Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments are nominated at one meeting and appointed at the subsequent meeting unless the Rules of Procedure are suspended by a unanimous vote of the Board members present. Preparer: _ , Title: County Attorney Steven L. Micas 0814(18):44868.1 Attachments: · Yes iD No ] # I I 4 I COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD VIRGINIA MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Directors The Honorable Members of the Board of Supervisors Lane B. Ramsey, County Administrator May 18, 1999 Appointment and Confirmation of Two Citizens to the Richmond First Tee Board of The lease between the County and Richmond First Tee provides that the Board must appoint a citizen to the Board of Directors of First Tee and confirm a Chesterfield resident who has already been appointed by First Tee. I currently serve as a member of the 10 person Board of Directors. The appointments are for three year terms from the date of appointment. Staff recommends Donald A. Jones as the citizen appointee. Mr. Jones is the Senior Vice-President for the Greater Richmond YMCA. Mr. Jones lives at HeathbluffCourt in the Matoaca District and is willing to serve. Staff recommends that Darcy Owen or Lester George be confirmed as the Chesterfield citizen who already serves on the Board of Directors. Darcy Owen is the President of the Community Foundation, a non-profit philanthropic organization and lives in the Midlothian Magisterial District. Lester George is the owner of an architectural firm and is a resident in the Matoaca District. 0818(14):44851.1 O43 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: $. 13. Subject: Streetlight Installation Approvals County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: This item requests Board approval of Streetlight Installations in the Bermuda, Dale, and Matoaca Districts and the removal of one light in the Bermuda District. Summary. of Information: Streetlight requests from individual citizens or civic groups are received in the Department of Environmental Engineering. Staff requests cost quotations from Virginia Power for each request received. When the quotations are received, staff re-examines each request and presents them at the next available regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Staff provides the Board with an evaluation of each request based on the following criteria: Streetlights should be located at intersections; There should be a minimum average of 600 vehicles per day (VPD) passing the requested location if it is an intersection, or 400 VPD if the requested location is not an intersection; Petitions are required and should include 75% of residents within 200 feet of the requested location and if at an intersection, a majority of those residents immediately adjacent to the intersection. CONTINUED NEXT PAGE Preparer: Richard M. Mc~q'~h, P.E. Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Title: Director, Envir0nmenti~l Engineering O44 "'"?HESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Summary. of Information: (Continued) Cost quotations from Virginia Power are valid for a period of 60 days. The Board, upon presentation of the cost quotation may approve, defer, or deny the expenditure of funds for the streetlight installation. If the expenditure is approved, staff authorizes Virginia Power to install the streetlight. A denial will cancel the project and staff will so notify the requestor. A deferral will be brought before the Board again when specified. BERMUDA DISTRICT: Ransom Hills Place and Ransom Hills Road, Ransom Hills Cost to install light: $ 2374.36 Does not meet minimum criterion for petition Ransom Hills Road and Ransom Hills Turn, Ransom Hills Cost to install light: $ 617.62 Does not meet minimum criterion for petition Ransom Hills Road and Ransom Hills Terrace, Ransom Hills Cost to install light: $ 2865.84 Does not meet minimum criteria for vehicles per day or petition Walthall Creek Drive and Woodsedge Road, vicinity of 1913 Walthall Creek Drive Cost to remove light: $155.05 Bermuda District Streetlight Funds Requested Balance Forward Expenditure $11,631 $2,374 $618 $2,866 $155 Effective Remaining Balance $9,257 $8,639 $5,773 $5,618 CONTINUED NEXT PAGE ?HESTERFIELD COUNTY -BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Summary_ of Information: (Continued) DALE DISTRICT: Newbys Wood Trail, at the dead end, Newby's Wood Cost to install light: $1247.65 Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles per day Dale District Streetlight Funds Requested Balance Forward Expenditure $14,352 $1,248 Effective Remaining Balance $13,104 MATOACA DISTRICT: Frye Terrace, in the cul-de-sac, Forest View Cost to install light: $ 343.36 Does not meet minimum criteria for intersection or vehicles per day Twisted Oak Drive and Twisted Oak Terrace Cost to install light: $ 361.11 Does not meet minimum criterion for vehicles per day Matoaca District Streetlight Funds Requested Balance Forward Expenditure $20,615 $343 Effective Remaining Balance $20,272 $361 $19,911 046 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda Distdct Request Received: Estimate Received: NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: December 21, 1998 April 20, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: Cost to install light: $ 2374,36 Bonita Clement- Secretary Proctors Point Homeowners Association 3244 Ransom Hill Road Richmond, VA 23237 Estimate Requested: December 21, 1998 120 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: Ransom Hill Place and Ransom Hills Road REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Staff or Requestor Comments: NONE Qualified Qualified Not Qualified, only 36% of residents within 200 feet signed the petition. 04? STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: Estimate Received: NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: December 21, 1998 April 20, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: Cost to install light: $ 617.62 Bonita Clement- Secretary Proctors Point Homeowners Association 3244 Ransom Hill Road Richmond, VA 23237 Estimate Requested: December 21, 1998 120 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: Ransom Hill Road and Ransom Hills Turn REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Staff or Requestor Comments: Qualified Qualified Not Qualified, only 46% of residents within 200 feet signed the petition. Staff notes that Virginia Power has determined that 3249 Ransom Hills Road is the least costly location for this requested installation. Staff has received written notification of objection to this installation from the owner of the residence at that location, STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: Estimate Received: NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: December 21, 1998 April 20, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: Cost to install light: $ 23?4,36 Bonita Clement - Secretary Proctors Point Homeowners Association 3244 Ransom Hill Road Richmond, VA 23237 Estimate Requested: December 21, 1998 120 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: Ransom Hill Road and Ransom Hills Terrace REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Qualified Qualified Not Qualified, only 57% of residents within 200 feet signed the petition. Staff or Requestor Comments: NONE O49 Stre,. Light Request Map May 26, 1999 HOWLE~¥ ~,i~ m~ is a ~,yri~hted produ~ o~f tae Chesterj~eid Cou~y C~ Ol~ Street Light Legend :~ existing light i~ requested light This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chester~ield County Environmental Engineering Department. 0.~0 STREETLIGHT REQUEST Bermuda District Request Received: Estimate Received: NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: April 2, 1999 Estimate Requested: April 28, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: Cost to remove light: $150.05 John Reid 9213 Walthall Creek Drive Colonial Heights, VA 23834 April 2, 1999 26 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: Walthall Creek Drive and Woodsedge Road, vicinity of 9213 Walthall Creek Road REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Staff or Requestor Comments: Staff notes that this light was installed at the request of the Walthall Creek Homeowners Association as part of a request for two lights at this intersection, one on each comer. Their request was approved on February 24, 1999, and installed on March 24, 1999. The Association verbally represented to both Virginia Power and staff that the location was common area under the control of the Association. On Mamh 29th, the actual owner of the property, Mr. Reid, contacted staff, reported that the area of the installation was, in fact, his property; that he had not been contacted by the homeowners association regarding the installation; that he was opposed to the installation; and requested that the light be removed be removed from his property. Staff met with Mr. Reid on April 2"d and determined that the light was installed on his property without his permission. This light has already been removed by Virginia Power. The cost noted is the offsetting cost of the 8 to 1 credit from the original project. Removal of this light will leave one light 14,000 lumen streetlight on the opposite corner from Mr. Reid's residence. STREETLIGHT REQUEST Dale District Request Received: March 1, 1999 Estimate Requested: March 1, 1999 NAME Of REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: Estimate Received: April 23, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: 53 Cost to install light: $1,247',65 Victor P. Marquez 5210 Newbys Wood Trail Chesterfield, VA ~ REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: Newbys Wood Trail, dead end at north end of the road, Newby's Wood POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Staff or Requestor Comments: Not Qualified, location not an intersection Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD Qualified Requestor states: "We are implementing a neighborhood watch. People have been known to park here late at night and the poice have been called to ask them to leave. A light would help to deter thought of crime or rowdiness. A private pond is nearby that people like to come and fish at evening without permission. Trash is being left behind." 052 Street Light Request Map Ma 26, 1999 ~ ,IACOt~S RD map. t~ a ~oyritht~I product of Che~t~rfu~t County 015 01~ Street Light Legend existing light requested light This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the Chesterfield County Environmental Engineering Department. STREETLIGHT REQUEST Matoaca District Request Received: Estimate Received: NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: April 26, 1998 April 20, 1999 Estimate Requested: April 26, 1998 Days Estimate Outstanding: 357 Cost to install light: $ 343.36 Charles E. Nicholson 18522 Rollingside Drive Colonial Heights, VA 23834 r-~ REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: Frye Terrace, in the cul-de.sac, Forest'view POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Staff or Requestor Comments: Requestor states: Not Qualified, location not an intersection Not Qualified, less than 400 VPD Qualified "Forestview is a new subdivision that has grown and will continue to grow. We have homeowners from different age groups which include children. There have been reports of property damage to new homes under construction and home owners as well." STREETLIGHT REQUEST Matoaca District Request Received: Estimate Received: NAME OF REQUESTOR: ADDRESS: Apdl 26, 1998 Estimate Requested: April 20, 1999 Days Estimate Outstanding: Cost to install light: $ 361,11 Chades E. Nicholson 18522 Rollingside Drive Colonial Heights, VA 23834 REQUESTED LOCATION IS THE INTERSECTION OF: Twisted Oak Drive andTwisted Oak Terrace, Forestview REQUEST IS NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. REQUESTED LOCATION IS: April 26, 1998 357 POLICY CRITERIA: Intersection: Vehicles per Day: Petition: Staff or Requestor Comments: Requestor states: Qualified Not Qualified, less than 600 VPD Qualified "Forestview is a new subdivision that has grown and will continue to grow. We have homeowners from different age groups which include children. There have been reports of property damage to new homes under construction and home owners as well." Strew. Light Request Map May 26, 1999 tT~ n~. i~ a cq~r~h~p~ ~f ~ c~ c~ am o~ Street Light Legend i~__~ existing light !-~ requested light This map shows citizen requested streetlight installations in relation to existing streetlights. Existing streetlight information was obtained from the ChesterfleM County Environmental Engineering Department. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8. C. Subject: Rescission of Deferral of Consideration of Route 288 Corridor Plan Area South of Route 60 and Accompanying Ordinance Amendment so that the Plan and Mandatory Connection Ordinance can be Considered on May 25, 1999 County Administrator's Comments: Board Action Requested: Rescind deferral of decision on Route 288 Corridor Plan area south of Route 60 and accompanying Ordinance amendment and consider adoption of the Plan and a mandatory connection ordinance. Summary_ of Information: At the April 24, 1999 Board of Supervisors meeting, the Board held a public hearing to consider adoption of the Route 288 Corridor Plan and accompanying ordinances. After dosing the public hearing the Board adopted the ordinance setting development standards for areas within the Route 288 plan map and deferred consideration of the plan area south of Route 60 and the mandatory connection ordinance for 60 days. The Board also deferred consideration of the Plan area north of Route 60 for 30 days. Staff'recommends that the Board rescind its decision to defer consideration of these items, and instead consider adoption of the Plan and the mandatory connection ordinance at the May 25, 1999 meeting. Preparer: - ~ Thomas ~./ficobson Attachments: [] Yes · No Title: Director of Planning 2014:44830.1 I#  CHF~TERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~-K-~ Page lof AGENDA Meeting Date: May 2~;, 1999 Item Number: Sub_ie~: Budget Revision for Chesterfield Community Services Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Appropriate $106,000 in additional State revenue and increase MH/MR/SA Department expenditure appropriations by $106,000. Summary of Informati0n: 1. The Virginia Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services (DMHMRSAS) has appropriated $80,000 to fund training activities for Community Services Boards in Health Planning Region IV. This training will expand case consultation work for consumer crisis stabilization and MH/MR dual diagnosis training activities. The Chesterfield CSB has been selected by DMHMRSAS to act as Fiscal Agent for these regional training funds. 2. The State has appropriated $26,000 for use by the CSB to fund the contract cost of providing very specialized services required by an individual recently discharged from Central State Hospital. Preparer: X~ ~t~t ~-~~ ~ Title: Ass't. Exec. Director, Community Service~ Boar~ v .G/ary F. South~d Attachments: Yes [--] No I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meetino Date: May 25. 1999 Number Bud.qet and Mana.qement Comments: This item seeks Board authorization to appropriate a total of $106,000 in state revenue for the Chesterfield County CSB. There are actually two separate items for consideration; the sum of these two items totals $106,000. Appropriation of $80,000 from the State Department of MH/MR/SA Services. The Chesterfield County CSB has been selected to act as the State's agent in preparing and conducting specialized training workshops for Mental Health professionals in the Richmond Metropolitan area (specifically, Health Planning Region IV). These workshops will provide therapists and professionals with training on crisis stabilization and dual-diagnosis management. The cost of this training will total $80,000. Full funding for this training will be provided by the State Department of MH/MR/SA Services; the Chesterfield CSB will act as the State's fiscal agent in disbursing these funds. 2. Appropriation of $26,000 from Central State Hospital. Central State Hospital will provide the Chesterfield County CSB $26,000 during FY99 to provide care for a patient who was released from the hospital and now resides in Chesterfield County. It is anticipated that the Hospital will provide up to $87,000 in FY2000 for the care of this individual; the Department will seek to appropriate the FY2000 revenue on a separate Board Agenda item in the future. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Budget & Manaqement CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meetin~ Date: Ma~ 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.2. Subject: Transfer of $100,000 from the Wagner Building Parking Lot Project to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Courts Project and Change Order to the Construction Contract with Kenbridge Construction Company, for the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Courts Project, in the Amount of $128,000 for Finishing Out Courtroom 5 and Associated Judge's Chamber County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize transfer of $100,000 from the Wagner Building Parking Lot project to the Juvenile Courts project and approval of a Change Order to the construction contract with Kenbridge Construction Company, for the Juvenile & Domestic Relations Courts project, in the amount of $128,000 for finishing out Courtroom 5 and associated Judge's Chamber. Summary of Information: The Board approved award of the construction for the new Juvenile & Domestic Relations Courts project at its November 24, 1998 meeting. In the agenda item, staff advised that it would evaluate the opportunity to award the balance of Alternate Number 1 and bring this item fo~ard for the Board's consideration based on available funding and timing of the fifth judgeship. Preparer: Title:Director of Genera% Service~ Francis M. Pitaro Attachments: No ()GO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 ~Meetin~ Date: Ma~ 25, 1999 Item Number: Summary of Information (Continued): Kenbridge Construction Company agreed, at the time of contract negotiations, to hold their bid pricing on the remaining portion of the original bid alternate for six months. That agreement expires May 30, 1999 The Juvenile Court is preparing the request for a fifth judgeship and expects approval by the committee on District Courts in November 1999, and subsequent General Assembly consideration in the 2000 session. If all actions are favorable, the fifth judge could start work on July 1, 2000, prior to completion of the new Juvenile & Domestic Relations Courts project. The project's Steering Committee has reviewed this request and recommends approval. While funding constraints were discussed at length, the committee felt that given the anticipated timing of the fifth judgeship, approval of this change order would provide the least costly and most timely option for finishing out this space. Project funds are currently available; however, the Board should note that additional work items have been identified and estimated costs for those items would exceed the available funding. Budget and Management comments will elaborate on this matter. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: May 25.1~7 Number Bud.qet and Manaqement Comments: This item requests Board approval to award the alternative bid item 1 to Kenbridge Construction Company for the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court Project. This item will finish out Courtroom 5 and the associated judge's chamber. The total cost for the item is $128,000, of which staff is requesting a transfer of $100,000 from the Wagner Building Parking lot project. The balance ($28,000) will be funded from the Juvenile and Domestic Relations court project contingency. Staff recommends approval of this item due to the costs associated with the construction. The Contractor has agreed to hold the price as quoted in the original bid through June. By awarding this contract now, the County may save substantial money because the price will most likely increase at a later time. In addition, it is more prudent to have the work performed now while the other courtrooms are being completed. Contractors and consultants are presently on site adding to the anticipated savings. Project funds are currently available for the above request. However, the Board should note that staff is predicting a shortfall in funding for the total project. The contingency balance will be approximately 1.0% of total unexpended project funds available for the remainder of the project, with approximately 18 months left for construction. Typically staff designates approximately 10% of total project funds for contingency balances. In addition, technology issues have been identified over and above the original technology study completed during the programming phase of the project. Both the scope and costs of the technology needs for the Courts building have increased. These additional needs will have to be evaluated during the FY2001 budget cycle. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Bud,qet & Manaqement CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: $.D.3.a, Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to the North Right of Way Line of Lucy Corr Court from Health Center Commission for the County of Chesterfield County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.155 acres from Health Center Commission for the County of Chesterfield, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.155 acres along the north right of way line of Lucy Corr Court (State Route 4795). This dedication is for the construction of Jury Drive. Approval is recommended. District: Dale Preparer: G~~n~N ~, d~~ r,., Attactmxents: YesI INo Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer # 063 VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LUCY CORR COURT FROM 1TEALTH CENTER COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD Lloyd C DFERFIELD Pith Juver ~dws O(;4 II- CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.3.b. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land on the North Side of Nash Road From Chesterfield Land & Timber Corp. County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.397 acres on Nash Road from Chesterfield Land & Timber Corp., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary_ of Information: This dedication is required for the Nash Road Water Pump Station. The issue of an adjacent owner claiming to own this property has been resolved by the County Attorney and the adjacent owner's attorney. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: J~ohn~W ~. ~~--~ . Harmon Attachments: YesI INo Title: Right of Way Manaqer # VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NASH ROAD FROM CHESTERFIELD LAND & TIMBER CORP. Southern Lan(Il PIPE(F CHESTERFIELD LAND & TIMBER CORP. D.B. 2205, PG. 440 PIN//: 764-656-1,542 o ROD(S; ROD(S) EDWARD M. HUDGINS, TRUSTEE D.8. 2151, PO. 655 PIN//: 764-655-70.54 \ -9 OVERHEAD '\\~/ POWER ~k~0.397 ACR] ¢ CHESTERFIELD LANI \~&: TIMBER CORP. \ ~D.B. 220,~, PG, 440 \ ~ A PORTION OF PIN#: 764-656-134; #11931 NASH ROAD THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ~THOUT THE BENEFIT OF A lilLE BINDER. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. EUOENE d. DESCHAMPS D.B. 1601, PG. 309 PIN#: 764-656-98,10 EXISTING 16' WATER ESM'T. D.B. 2096 PG. 1691 EXISTING 20' WATER ESM'T. F-- ..... D,13. 1777 ~ PG. 1 t C/L- 30' PRESCRIPTI S 45'46'06"1 EASEMENT · 16.22 STEVEN d. &: RENE T. TAYLOR D.B. 5568, PG. 570 PIN//: 765-655-2503 C/L PAINTED WATERLINE ROD EXISTING 20' ESM'T. D.B. 1731 Pg. 1630 EXISTINO 20' WATER ESM'T. D.B. 1851 PO. 1551 86.44 --S 66'29'23"W NASH ROAD 3,655,372.43 11,765,255.71 STATE ROUTE 636 ROD VARIABLE WIDTH R/W ~3 \ N/F SHOOSMITH BROTHERS · D.B. 2203, PG. 440 PIN#: 768-654-1587 UNE OF ROAD ROUTE 655 ROD(F) PLAT SHOWING 0.397 ACRE OF LAND LYING ON THE NORTH LINE OF N SH OAD OU F, Cae) MATOACA DISTRICT * CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~.1 U,/,' THIS 13 TO GERT]F\' ,'D!AT FLOOD ZOHE C- DAflEL HO: $10035 0088 B I MADE AN ACCURATE FIELD TRAVERSE OF THE PROPERLY ~ SHOWN. TO ]}~E BEST OF My ~_~_~. i~EO r,[]~iKNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF' THE RGE k BRYAN' MINIMUM FIELD AND OFFICE PROCEDURES FOR BOUNDARY' SURVEYS ESTABIJSHED BY 3HE COMMONWEALTH OF ~RGINIA HAVE BEEN COMPUED WlTH, 0 40 80 Koontz. Bryant, ~.?. ENGINEERS & SURVEy 120 1100 W~LBORNE DRIVE RICHMOND, V1R(~NIA 23229 (804) 740-9200 FAX (804) 740-73,.38 DATE: FEB. 26, 1999 SCALE: 1" = 40' CHKD BY: ~-,zt,¢-~ DRAWN BY: MRS JOB NO: 99419 99419BDY,DWO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: $.D.3.c. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along the West Right of Way Line of Warbro Road and the North Right of Way Line of Hull Street Road from Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of parcels of land containing 0.305 acres along the West Right of Way Line of Warbro Road and 0.014 acres along the north right of way line of Hull Street Road from Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary_ of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of these parcels conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Clover Hill Preparer: John W. Harmon Attacb_ments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WARBRO ROAD AND THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF HULL STREET ROAD FROM WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST 070 N COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD JO' SEFER EASEMENT & 25' TEMP, CONSTRUCtiON EASEMENT D.B. JJ64, PC. 18 F I IRWN G, HORNER ! W8 108 PAGE 35! ! GROSSING. LLC. GPfN 73768J200J ! )B 3583, PG 144- / I I PROPERTY / N ,:7682620.66.73 LINE...~// E Il? / / I ! / / I I I .XREA= 0.112 ACRES' COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD SEWER EASEMENT D.B. 1808 PO. 408 ~EA: 0.305 AC} WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST DB 3563 PAGE 224 CURVE TABLE cuRVE DELTA I RADIUS I ARC I C~ORO I BEARING IrANGE^ CI 08'26'40" 158ZTJ 2J4.00 2JJ. 79 I 5 2J~4'54' E { IIZ21 C2 OJ'Jl'50" 4512.55 278.~ 2~8.02 N 20~7'29" W { IJg. 0Z cJ I ~'0~" 'lz47fi, 55 7~.~5 { 74.15 lN 2~'27' ~l J7, O8 c~ I oJ~'m' I~o.~lJ~ZOJ I~ I ~ m~r~' ~ I ~'~ c~ o~'~r I~a.~l ~a~.~ 12~.~, I s ~'o~' ~ t '~.~ c~ I oa~'~o" C7 ~'44'42" 14~zz~51 ~9.4z I ~9.47 IN 19~J'~' WI ca 08~4'37" I~aTO, a61274.62 1 274,37 { S 23~4'~" E { IJZfi~ AREA: 0.273 ACRES APPROX. LOCATION OF COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD DRAINAGE & FILL EAS D.B. 1544, PG. 97 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING D/STANCE LIS 6472'05" iV I 45, J? L2 N I0"58'II~E { 64,00 L4 S 19'II'J4" E { 154.49 L5 O 22'4J'24' W I 32.19 L7 S 2371'39" E [Jh45 uo ~ 24vo'~* ~ I U2 S ~7~4'~0" W J u4 N 62'~8'25' E J L~ N 2Z~'~4" W I Z~.~ I~ ~'2Z'J~" ~ J L20 J N 27'~'24' W ~ ZXaSO J Lm J s z~'4~'sr ~ ~.z~ L~ ~ ~2'~'~" E L23 J N 65~2"56" E t0.27 J L2~ J S 27'38'14" E739.32 J L25 J S 19'II"3~" E56.20 L26 S 1971'48" E 28.0~ J L27 N 62'47'29" E 8.56 IRVING. HORNER ]VB 108 PAGE 351 3800 WARBRO ROAD GPIN ?386820134 PROP. PLAT SHOWING 0.112 ACRES, 0.305 ACRES dc 0.273 ACRES OF TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CLOVER ItlLL DISTRICT ,.. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA,  COUNTY PROJECT NO. 98-0070 PRINCE GEORGE OFFICE 4411 CROSSINGS BE. VD. __INCE GEORGE, VIRGINIA  DA TE: 5-10-99 PREVIOUS JOB NO.. CALC. CHK.:. LAND I'IMMOIV$ ENGINEERS * ARCHITECTS * SURVEYORS SCALE: DRAWN BY,' CHECKED JOB' NO.: 18111--6~ PROPOSED~ ~SED~ WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST DB 3563, PAGE 224 SEE DETAIL £ I1738500.1550 AREA= 0.014 ACRES E 1173E159.$670 SEE DETAIL THE PLA T SHOWING 0.0/4 ACRES OF LAND TO BE DEDICATED TO COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CLOVER HILL DISTRICT ,.. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA, PRE~1OUS JOB NO.. COUNTY PROJ NO. 98-0070 'IMMON$ ' ENGINEERS * ARCHITECTS * SURVEYORS PRINCE GEORGE OFFICE 4411 CROSSINGS BLVD, __INC~ GEORGE, VIRGINIA TE: 5--10-99 SCALE: I"60' DRAWN BY: AWS CHECKED BY: WMN CALC. CHK.:. JOB NO.: 18111-62 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.3.d. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to the East Right of Way Line of Warbro Road from Irvin G. Hornet County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.273 acres Adjacent to the East Right of Way Line of Warbro Road from Irvin G. Horner, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed. District: Clover Hill Preparer: ~~ '-~. ~'~" Title: John W. Harmon Attachments: YesI ]No Right of Way Manaqer # 073 VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WARBRO ROAD FROM IRVING HORNER t I. ',,,. .,..: I ~ ,,' ':,, /~/ 4~'',,,", ' /~ ~,. ~ '~ ~ ~US~SSPK ~/. ' -~. ~,~ L~ 074 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD ,70' SEWER EASEMENT & 25' TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT / D.B. 3364, PC. 18 IRWN O. HORNER i · B 108 PAGE J51 CPIN 7J768~200`7 i )B 3563, PC, 144 / PROPERTY / N ,:7682620.66,:7,:7 LINC.-...~iI E / AREA= / O. 112 ACRES' COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD SEWER EASE'WENT f..-" D. 8. 1808 PG. 408 AREA= O. 30§ WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST DB 3563 PAC,E 224 cu,~VEI BELTA I RAOlus l .~RC I CHORO I BEARI~S C~ ] 08~6'40' 758~ 73 234.00123179 ] S 2J~4'54" E ~ C2 ~ O~PSO" 45~2.55 278.06 I 278.02 J N 20'57'29" W I 139,08 c~ /~'~'~' I~.~1 z~.~ I z~.~ I~ ~o'2r wi ,/ PROP. R,,'., AREA= 0.273 ACRES N E 11738542.4 APPROX. LOCA T/ON OF COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD DRAINAGE & FILL D.B. 1544, PG. 97 L2 L4 L5 ' L6 L? L9 LIO ] Lll ~. LI2 ! LI3 ! LI4 ! LIS ! LI6 ~ L~ LIS LI9 L20 L21 L22 L2J L24 L25 L26 L27 LINE TABLE BEARING 6_~72'05" N 10'58'II" lg'll'J, 4" 22'43'24" 47'$6'11" 2J"11'39" 19'II',18" 27'36'24" 2470'23' 27'36'24' 17'24'10" 62'26'55" 62'18'25" 72'3,8"14" 27'38"~4" 1971'34* 24'27'38' 19'11'48" E 27'36'24" 72'48'57' 62'26'55" 6552'56" 27U8'14" E 19'1FJ4" E 1971'4B' t 62'47'29" 7ISTANCE 45. J7 64.0O 154.49 J2.19 9.87 JI. 45 107,72 JIZBO 200, 36 200. 18.51 215,66 70. ?I ?J9. J2 210.~9 10Z88 IJ5,80 7~a~O l 64, 76 ] 200.18 10.27 739,32 56.20 28. 08 8,56 I IRVIN O. HORNER WB 108 PAC,E 351 3800 WARBRO ROAD C,PIN 7386820134 PROP. PLAT SHOWING 0.112 ACRES, 0.305 ACRES 0.273 ACRES OF TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CLOVER HILL DISTRICT ~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA,  COUNTY PROJECT NO, 98-0070 (~ PRINCE GEORGE OFFICE 4411 CROSSINGS BT. VD. ~ PRINCE GEORGE, V1RGINtA 25875--'1'455-.  'ATE: 5-10-99 SCALE: I"==200' DRAWN BY.- Al/YE CHECKED BY: H~N CALC. CHK..'. PREWOUS JOB NO.. -- ~111--6~ LAND ENGINEERS * ARCHITECTS * SURVEYORS CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D. 3.e. Subject: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Adjacent to the North Right of Way Line of Commonwealth Centre Parkway from Faison-Commonwealth Centre Limited Partnership County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.0824 acres from Faison-Commonwealth Centre Limited Partnership, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.0824 acres along the north right of way line of Commonwealth Centre Parkway (State Route 2055). This dedication is for the relocation of Commonwealth Centre Parkway. Approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Preparer: ~ -z~f. ~ ~-~ John N. Harmon Attachments: YesI INo Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ADJACENT TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COMMONWEALTH CENTRIg PARKWAY FROM FAISON-COMMONWEALTH CENTRE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOX~ ~IL ~ -RED CHESTNUT CT LITCH tONWEALTI OFC PK IWELVE OAKS RD GLEr,~ .0' .~'_<~,~¢ ~,~" C U R V E D A T A / N 3,677,823.07 '/0. CONCRFTF /~ /2/~ R=790.00' MONUM~ff~o -7~ A=O 1~ 2 ~' 28" FOUND ~ ID _ ~ O~ -- T=S. Se , ~ ~ IRS ~,~ '~ ~ 'V~. C =1 8.7 2' ~~/~~_~ PLAT SHOWING 0.0824 ACRE TO BE ~ ~TLT~¢~ ~ ~ DEDICATED TO CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ~ NO. 1661 ~ LOCATED ON THE L~D OF ~ ~/7/98 ~ FAISON-COMMONWEALTH CENTRE LIMITED P~TNERSHIP ~ ~ ~ ~ MATOCA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HGP, INC. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 50 0 15 3O 710-2 PRINCESS ANNE STREET FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA 22401 PH (540) 371-5171 (540) 373-4150 FAX LAND SURVEYING -- CONSULTING -- PLANNING -- SUBDIVISIONS BOUNDARIES - TOPOGRAPHY - BASE MAPPING - GEODETIC CONTROL DATE: 4/7/98 REF: DRAWN BY:D.K.R. CHECKED BY: j CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page. 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: $.D.3.f. Subject: Acceptance of Parcels of Land Along the West Right of Way Line of Warbro Road and Along and Extending Northwardly from the North Right of Way Line of Hull Street Road from Chesterfield Crossing, L.L.C. County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of parcels of land containing 0.112 acres along the west right of way line of Warbro Road and 2.639 acres along and extending northwardly from the north right of way line of Hull Street Road from Chesterfield Crossing, L.L.C., and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary_ of Information: The dedication of these parcels Chesterfield Crossing. is required for the development of District: Clover Hill Preparer: J~?n W. -''j'HarmOn ~~~ Attactunents: Yes Title: NO Right of Way Manager 079 VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF PARCELS OF LAND ALONG THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WARBRO ROAD AND ALONG AND EXTENDING NORTHWARDLY FROM THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF HULL STREET ROAD FROM CHESTERFIELD CROSSING, L.L.C. Land Fill ~RBRO PK rpt LAKE ,RED CHESTNUT CT IONWEALTI OFC PK C~LEN [~ Gilmore I ALBERTA CT E ' 2 BLOSSOMWOOB CIR -- Crenshaw:~::': 080 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD 30' SEWER EASEMENT & 25' TEMP. CONSTRUCDON EASEMENT D. 8, $J64, PO, 18 IRVING. HORNER i! lYE 108 PAGE J51 / CROSSING. L. LC. CP/N 7J7685200J / )B 3§63, PG 14.4 / / / PROPERTY / N 3682620.66.77 L/NE...,.// / / / AREA= ! 0.112 ACRES' / COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD SEWER EASEMENT ,..: O.a mO8 PC. 408 AREA= 0.305 ACRES WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST DB 3563 PAGE 224 f' CURVE TABLE CURVEI DELTA [RADIUSI ARC I CHORO I BEARING ITANGEN] CI I 08'26'40" I587.73] 2.74.00 23`7.79 ] S 23'24'54" E I IIZ2I C2 I OJ'J1'50" 14512.55] 27806 1278.02 IN 20'57'29" H; ] IJ9.08 c`7 I oou,ro6- 17,75.5~1 7,.,5 I 74.,5 IN 2`7v0'27- "'1 `77.o6 ~4 I 0j'~9'51" 1~690.581 `79z0`7 1 `796.95 I N 71','43' ,' 1198.60 .5 I 08'24'`77" I194B. 861286.061285. aI | s 23.24.06. E ] i4`7.29 L c8 o8~4'3z" 11870.86[274,~21274.37~S23.24,0~.E 113Z55 PROP. R/W E I1738542.,i APPROX, LOCATION OF COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD DRAINAGE & FILL D. 8. 1544. PC. 97 AREA= 0.273 ACRES J LINE TABLE LINE BEARING L~' S 6472'05" W " L2 N 10'58'11" E L4 S 19'H'~4" E L5 N 22'4`7'24" W L6 S 47'`76'11' W L7 S 23~1'39" E t8 S ~9'II'48' E ~ L$ N 27~6'2~' W J uo N 2~o~J' w ~ LI~ N 27'J6'24" W ~ LI2 S I7~4'I0" W I uJ IN~2~'55'E ~ LI~ ~ N 62"18~5' E I us Is ;... LI7 ~ N 19'I1'~4' W ti8 ~ N 24'27'~8" W LI9 ~ S I~'II'48" E t20 ~ N 27~6'24" W ~2~ ~ s ~2'~8'~z" ~ L22 ~ N 62'26'5fi* E t2$ ~ N 6552'56" E L24 ~ S 27~8'~4' E ~S 19~1'48' E t27 ~ N 62'47'29" E o~s r~-~-~ 45, J7 64. O0 154,49 `72, ~ 9 9.87 .71.45 107. 72 317.80 200, J6 200,12 ,B.S, 215.66 70.7I 739, J2 210.69 I07. B8 IJS. 80 718.50 64.76 ~ 2oo. lbI 10.27 ~ 7J9, J2~ 56.20 ~ 28.08__~ 8.5~ I IRV[NG. HORNER WB 108 PAGE 351 3800 WARBRO ROAD GPIN 7386820134 PLA T SHOW/NC 0./12 ACRES, 0.2,05 ACRES & 0.27,3 ACRES OF TO BE DEDICATED TO THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD c£°v~R ~:££ D;$TRICT- CH~$r£R?I£Z,D COUNTY, Vh~CINI,4,  COUNTY PROJECT NO. 98-0070 ENGINEERS · ARCHI?EC~S · SURVEYORS ' PRINCE GEORGE OFFICE 4411 CROSSINGS BT_VD, ~ PRINCE GEORGE, VIRGINIA 23875-~455--.  DA TE: 5--10--99 SCALE.. 1%200' PRAWN BY: AWE CHECKED BY: WMN CALC. CHK.: PRE~1OUS JO8 NO.. LAND JOB NO.: 18111-62 -- I£WN G. HORNER El' ALS WB 108 PAGE 351 GPIN 7376832003 /[ P.. ROPERTY LINE ~ DB ,.756.:7, PG 144 DB 356~. PO 150 AREA= 2.639 ACRES IRWN G, HORNER ET DB 3563, PO 217 CHESTERFIELD J/'' CROSSING, LL.C. ~ / DB 3563, PC 150 ! [ COUNI'y OF CHESI'ERFIELD 16' SEI/kER EASEIdENI' D,B. 1808 PC, 408 HOME DEPOT U.S,A., INC. CHESTERF[ELD CROSSING, L.L,C. DB J563, PG 221 DB J553, P~ 144 DB 3563, PG 150 APPROXlM~ rE LOCA UON OF Ar~F EASEMEN~ CHESTERFIELD CROSSING, L,L.C. DB 3563, PG /50 I CHESTERFIELD CROSSING, L,L.C. DB 3563, PC 150 C6 360 RD. LINE TABLE LILNiE BEAR/NO D/STANCE N 3979'48' W 135.$1 L2 S 82',:73'56' ~' 6,.7.02 L3. S 3979'48' E 44.85 L4 N '~'45'45' W l 9.85 THE CLOVER HILL PREVIOUS dOB NO. CURVE TABLE CUR VE DEL TA RADIUS ARC CH~D BEARING rANGEI~ C1 88'41'5J' 95.92 148.49 I;74.10 N 04'59'0B' E~ 93.76 C2 09'06'03~ 4069. J2 646.36 645.68 iN 16'46'56' W J2J. B6 C3 09'78'49' 4159.32 676.11 675.37 N 75'.,~'J1' W 3J8.80 C4 J2154'07' 600.00 344.55 J,~9.83 N 55'46'51'if, 177.17 C5 31"J~'10'" 500.00 276.24 27'2.74 N 5,,SD9'~,7'W 141.75 CA 0.;7',,74'2I' 2804.00 174.83 174.80 $ ,~5'59'07' H' 87.44 CF O~",SU'fO' 2804.00 433.66 43,:7.23 $ 44'~3'04'W 217.26 PLA T SHO WING 2.639 ACRES OF LAND TO BE D£DICA TED TO COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD DISTRICT CHESTERIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA. COUNTY PROJECT NO. 98-0070 _@, ENGINEERS * ARCHITECTS * SURVEYORS PR~IINCE GEORGE OFFICE 4411 CROSSINGS GEORGE. VIRGINI___~A ]-8685 DA TE: 4-7-99 SCALE: I~200' DRAWN BY; AWS CHECKED BY'F/MN CALC, CHK..'. JOB NO.: I8111-62 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number. 8.D 3 Subiect: Acceptance of a Parcel of Land Along East of Ruffin Mill Road (State Route 746) from Oliver D. Rudy, Trustee County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 3.52 acres along east of Ruffin Mill Road (State Route 746) from Oliver D. Rudy, Trustee, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed. Summary of Information: This dedication is required for the Ashton Creek Business Center. is recommended. District: Bermuda Approval J~hn W. Harmon Attachments: YesI Title: Right of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG EAST OF RUFFIN MILL ROAD FROM OLIVER D RUDY TRUSTEE g g CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.4. Su~ect: Street Name Changes and Additions County_ Administrator's Comments: County. Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the naming and renaming of several streets on the County Complex. Summary_ of Information: Several projects are in progress which impact streets within the county complex and will necessitate name changes or additions. Staff briefed the Circuit Court, the County Health Department, Social Services Board, Nursing Home Health Center Commission and other interested parties on the proposed changes. The affected parties have supported the name changes as recommended below. The following numbers correspond to the attached map. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Jury Drive and Lucy Corr Court to become Lucy Corr Boulevard Wagner Building address will be Lucy Corr Circle Lucy Corr Road from Courthouse Road to Krause Road to be named Government Center Parkway That portion of Lucy Corr Drive from Lori Road going east past the County Garage to become Lori Lane Lucy Corr Drive from Courthouse Road extended to the new Lucy Corr Boulevard to be Courts Complex Road Courts Complex Road to be named Jury Drive New road from route 10 to Lori Road to be named Frith Lane STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS; Recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve the renaming of the streets which are located in the Bermuda District. Preparer: Title: Director of General Services nci~ Pitaro Attachments: Yes ~No 0 0 0 E 0 c z 0 0 -CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page! of 1 Meeting Date: May25,1999 Item Number: 8. D. 5. Subject: State Road Acceptance County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information: DALE: Gregorys Charter, Section B Preparer: ~'~ P.E. Attachments: Yes ~-~ No Title: Director. Environmental Engineering TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Depm-m~t of Em4mmmntal Engineering SUBJECT: State Road Acceptance - GRECK)RYS CHARTER, SEC. B DISTRICT: DAI~E MEbTFING DATE: 25 May 1999 ROADS FOR CONSIDERATION: BRIARWlCK DR GREGORYS CHARTER DR Vicinity Map: GREC_Z)RYS CHARTER, SEC. B ~by Chesterfield Cotmty GIS Meeting Date:~av 25, ~_9~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: Page ~ ,of.~_ 8.D.6.a. Subject: Request to Set a Public Hearing Date to Consider the Chesterfield School-to-Work Initiative Grant County Administrator's Comments: CountyAdministrator: BoardAcfionRequested: The School Board requests the Board of Supervisors advertise and hold a public hearing on June 23, 1999, to appropriate Virginia School-to-Work Initiative funds ($556,831), donations of $42,368, and a transfer of $65,522 from the School Operating Fund to the Instruction Appropriation category in the S School ~nra~ts F.und. for the Chesterfield School-to-Work Initiative u~a~. o~ lmormauon. Chesterfield County Public Schools is eligible for $556,831 of Federal grants funding under the Virginia School-to-Work Initiative Local Partnership Grants. This grant application must first be approved by the School Board and then the Board of Supervisors must approve the grant and appropriate the-total funds of $664,721 in FY2000. The High Schools That Work focuses on improving student achievement in academic and vocational classes. The Career Development Advisory Committee is actively involved in Chesterfield County with representatives from the public and private sectors and all magisterial districts. The committee provides oversight and guidance to the Career Development Department of Chesterfield County Public Schools (CCPS). The mission of the committee is: Preparer: ' ' Willi-am C Attachments: Yes ~~ Title: ~oshey ~Jr Superintendent 057 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page z of 6 Summary of Information: (Continued) · Contribute to the continuous improvement of vocational education and the development of new initiatives; · Collaborate with the School Board, Superintendent, administrative staff, consumers, and parents to promote vocational education and enhance its image; and, · Support vocational education as preparation for school-to-work transitioning and continuous learning. This Chesterfield School-to-Work Initiative Grant proposal, developed jointly by the Offices of Career Development and Student Services, will assist the Committee with its mission by funding the following initiatives: · Support increased student achievement of the Virqinia Standards of Learninq - CCPS will enroll all secondary students served in the vocational/technical programs funded through this proposal in courses in the core academic subjects of English, math, science, and social studies. Technical writing, problem solving and critical thinking skills will be embedded in vocational/technical curricula. Students who are at risk for failure on the SOL tests will be offered remedial instruction. Promote student internships and other after-school work or mentorinq experiences that support academic achievement and career exploration - CCPS in collaboration with Capital One will operate PM Tech, an after school vocational/technical, job shadowing, and cooperative education program for at-risk students. Increase parental involvement in their children's schools and education - CCPS will involve parents of students enrolled in the vocational/technical programs funded through this grant in mapping a career path for their child using the Career Path Guide developed by the Career Development Department. Facilitate student access to postsecondar¥ education or traininq opportunities of the student's choice - CCPS will collaborate with John Tyler Community College to offer dual enrollment credit in the programs funded through this grant. Career paths in the PM Tech CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 4 Summary of Information: (Continued) program will be designed to lead to apprenticeships or community college coursework following completion of this program. The grant funding received will be used to hire two (2) full-time teachers ($76,284) with one for the Chesterfield Community High School and one for SOL remediation. In addition, a career advisor ($56,585) and a cooperative education coordinator ($36,936) will be hired to work with this program. The PM Tech staffing will consist of a part-time administrator as well as part-time instructors ($91,098) and will be funded from both grant funds and donations. Other uses of grant funds includes purchase of various equipment ($255,659) and operating costs such as training, printing, and supplie~ The Customer Call Center Coordinator is funded in the FY2000 School Operating Fund Budget and these funds will be transferred to the School Grants Fund. 0S9 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 4 of 4 Meeting Date: Mav 25. 1999 Number Bud.qet and Manaqement Comments: On May 11, 1999 the School Board took action requesting that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing for June 23, 1999 to consider the appropriation of $556,831 in federal grant funds. The School Board is also requesting appropriation of donations in the amount of $42,368 and a transfer of $65,522 from the School Operating Fund to the Instruction appropriation category in the School Grants Fund for the Chesterfield School-to-Work Initiative Grant. These appropriations and transfers will be effective July 1, 1999 for FY2000. This grant focuses on improving student achievement in academic and vocational classes and will be used to hire two full time teachers ($76,284 one position for the Chesterfield Community High School and one for SOL remediation). In addition, a career advisor ($56,585) and a cooperative education coordinator ($36,936) will be hired to work with this program. Evening technical staffing will consist of a part time administrator as well as part time instructors ($91,098) and will be funded from both grant funds and donations. Other uses of grant funds include purchase of various equipment ($255,659) and operating costs such as training, printing, and supplies. The customer call center coordinator is funded in the FY2000 School operating fund budget and these funds will be transferred to the School Grants fund. Rebecca T. Dickson O.9O VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting of the Chesterfield County School Board held Tuesday evening, May 11, 1999, at seven- thirty o'clock in the County meeting room at the Chesterfield County Courthouse Complex PRESENT: Thomas L. Wootton, Jr., Chairman Elizabeth B. Davis, Vice-Chairman Dianne E. Pettitt James R. Schroeder, D.D.S. Marshall W. Trammell, Jr. RESOLUTION On motion of Mrs. Davis, seconded by Mr. Trammell, the School Board requests the Board of Supervisors to advertise and hold a public hearing to approve an increase of $556,831 of Federal funding, an increase of $42,368 of donations, and an increase of $65,522 from the School Operating Fund to the School Grants Fund and appropriate $664,721 to the Instruction Appropriation Category in the School Grants Fund for the FY2000 Chesterfield School-to- Work Initiative Grant. William C~Bosher, Jr., Si )erintendent CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8. D. 6.b. Subject: Set a Public Hearing to Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of Parcels of Land for the Expansion of Meadowbrook High School and Authorization to Enter and Take Such Property Prior to Eminent Domain Proceedings County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors set a public hearing for June 23, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the exercise of eminent domain for the acquisition of parcels of land for the expansion of Meadowbrook High School and authorization to enter and take such properties prior to eminent domain proceedings. Summary_ of Information: The Right of Way Office has been negotiating with several property owners along Cogbill Road to acquire property for the expansion of Meadowbrook High School. There are a total of 15 parcels which needed to be acquired and staff has been successful in securing all but two parcels, 5015 and 5011 Cogbill Road. Staff has been unable to reach an agreement with these property owners. Authorization at a public hearing will allow the County to take immediate title to the properties and will obligate the County to purchase the properties sought. Staff will continue to negotiate with the owners in an effort to reach a settlement. Approval is recommended. Districts: Dale ~ohn W. Harmon Attachments: YesI INo Title: Riqht of Way Manager )f~eadowurook CC ? 'l'Me Me:*dowdaJe nsi *' = OALE USCG ~ Stl~.TES N 3O 6~4 49~7 sol6 ~2 .~619 4,942 41 5127 74 8636 51~5 ,31 2641 ~2 374? 5035 4665 o 5654 50;)9 INDEi~E§ ON '77~3-6~32 7g o5.Q7 5111 5504 50~1 4876 5100 4O 68084 5030 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D. 6.c. Subject: Set aPublic Hearing for June 23, 1999 to Consider Amendments to Sections 15-179, 15-189, 15-191 and 15-196 and Adding Section 15-219 of the County Code Relating to the Regulation of Taxicabs County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~~~;~ Board Action Requested: Set a public hearing for June 23, 1999 to consider amendments to Sections 15-179, 15-189, 15-191 and 15-196 and Adding Section 15-219 of the County Code relating to the regulation of taxicabs. Summary_ of Information: Over the course of the last year, the Richmond Regional Taxicab Advisory Board, chaired by Mr. Barber, has studied several issues related to the regulation of the taxicab industry in the Richmond metropolitan area. Chesterfield, Hanover, Henrico and Richmond all adopted a model ordinance several years ago. At their meeting on March 16, the Advisory Board approved a slate of changes to the model ordinance and is recommending that each jurisdiction adopt these changes. The changes are as follows: 2. 3. 4. permit station wagons to be used as taxicabs; reduce the minimum curb weight of vehicles to be used as taxicabs; increase the age limit for vehicles to be used as taxicabs from ten years to twelve years; include consideration of an applicant's criminal conviction record as a basis for refusing a taxicab drivers permit; increase the rate for the first 1/5 mile of a taxicab charge from $1.50 to $2.50; and add a dress code requirement for taxicab drivers. Mr. Barber requests the Board to set a public hearing for June 23 to consider these ordinance amendments. Steven L. Micas Attachments: · Yes [] No County Attorney 0614:44820.1 I# C )5 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 15-179, 15-189, 15-191 AND 15-196 AND ADDING SECTION 15-219 RELATING TO TAXICABS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Sections 15-179, 15-189, 15-191 and 15-196 of the Code of the Coun~ o_f Chester_field, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 15-179. Certificate of public convenience and necessity. OOO (g) A certificate holder shall not place into service a taxicab unless it is a four-door, hard-top vehicle, including station wagons, that meets or exceeds the following minimum specifications: (1) (2) (3) Wheel size: 14 inches. Wheel base: 106 inches. Curb weight: 2,900 ~q~ lbs.; except for any vehicle properly placed into service prior to October 1, 1994, that has been continuously operated by the same certificate holder and that otherwise meets all the requirements of this article. (h) No person shall operate any taxicab which either is more than twelve ten model years old or which has more than 300,000 miles. 000 Sec. 15-189. Refusal of permit. Subject to the provisions of section 15-183, the chief of police shall not issue a driver's permit if: o00 The applicant has ever been convicted of, pleaded guilty to or pleaded nolo contendere to any felony involving violence, or distribution of a controlled substance, or to any other felony, or combination of felonies, which indicates to the chief of police that the applicant is of unfit or unworthy character. The chief shall consider the period of time that has passed since the conviction, plea, etc. as well as any other mitigating circumstances presented by the applicant. The applicant knowingly makes, or causes to be made, either directly or indirectly, any false statement on his applications. (gh) The applicant otherwise lacks the following minimum physical or mental qualifications: Drivers shall have no mental, nervous, organic or functional disease likely to interfere with safe driving. Drivers shall have no loss or impairment of use of foot, leg, fingers, hand or arms or other structural defect or limitation likely to interfere with safe driving. 3. Drivers shall in all other respects satisfy the minimum physical and mental requirements for issuance of a driver's license by the state department of motor vehicles. The applicant is less than 18 years of age. (i}) The applicant does not possess a valid and current driver's license issued by the state department of motor vehicles. Sec. 15-191. Issuance of permit after refusal; reissuance after revocation. Except as provided in section 15-192 below, no person who is refused a taxicab driver's permit or whose permit is revoked under the provisions of section 15-190 shall be eligible for issuance of a new permit until such time as the grounds for refusal of a permit no longer apply. However, if a driver's permit is refused or revoked for (i) knowingly making, or causing to be made, either directly or indirectly, a false statement while applying for the permit, (ii) for charging a rate above or below the rates prescribed by section 15-196, or (iii) for reasons described in sections 15-190(d) or (e), such driver shall not be eligible for at least 12 months from the date of refusal or revocation or from the date the chief of police was informed of the grounds supporting such revocation, whichever is later. Sec. 15-196. (a) Same--Enumerated; special discount for elderly passengers and disabled passengers. Taxicab drivers shall charge passengers: For the first one-fifth mile...,~l.*' 50 $2.50 ooo (2) That Section 15-219 of the Code qf the Coun~ qf Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is added to read as follows: 0614:44818.1 2 Sec. 15-219. Dress Code. Taxicab drivers shall be fully and neatly dressed and exhibit good personal hygiene without offensive body odor. All clothing shall be clean, free of holes, rips or tears, present a professional appearance; clothing shall not exhibit any symbols, phrases or rendering that are obscene and shall comply with the following standards: Male drivers are required to wear long pants or professional length uniform shorts, buttoned shirts with fold-down collars and sleeves, and shoes. Pullover "polo" shirts, with fold-down collars, buttons and short sleeves, are permitted. Shoes shall be clean, closed-in and worn with socks. Hair, beards and/or moustaches must be neat, trimmed and present a groomed appearance. Female drivers are required to wear long pants, professional length shorts, skirts, dresses (professional length), shirts or blouses, and shoes. Pullover "polo" shirts, with fold-down collars, buttons and short sleeves, are permitted. Shoes shall be clean, closed-in and worn with socks or stockings. Hair must be neat, trimmed and present a groomed appearance. (3) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0614:44818.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.6.d. Subject: Set a Public Hearing for June 23, 1999 to Consider Adoption of Ordinance Permitting Citizens to Establish "No-Wake" Zones in Lake Chesdin and Setting a Public Hearing for July 28, 1999 to Consider Approval of a "No-Wake" Zone for a Portion of Lake Chesdin County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Set a public hearing for June 23, 1999 to consider adoption of an ordinance permitting the establishment of "No-Wake" zones in Lake Chesdin. Set a public hearing for July 28, 1999 to consider approval of an application to establish a "No-Wake" zone for a portion of Lake Chesdin. Summary_ of Information: State law provides that "No-Wake" zones can be established for bodies of water if a locality has adopted an ordinance allowing such zones to be created. The proposed ordinance would permit the approval of "No-Wake" zones and gives the State Department of Game and Inland Fisheries final approval authority. Any person requesting the establishment of such a zone will bear all costs associated with creation of the zone and the maintenance of the required buoys. The proposed ordinance not only allows the County to approve "No-Wake" zones on Lake Chesdin but also validates "No-Wake" zones approved for Lake Chesdin in the past. Before the state can approve a "No-Wake" zone, the affected locality must hold a public hearing and forward the application to Game and Inland Fisheries. A resident in the Eagles Cove Subdivision has requested permission to apply to the Department to establish a "No-Wake" zone on Lake Chesdin. (See attached letter and map). All of Lake Chesdin is within Chesterfield County. Staff recommends setting a public hearing to consider adoption of the enabling ordinance for June 23, and a public hearing to consider an application to establish a "No-Wake" zone for July 28. Steven L. Micas 2014:44401.1 Attachments: J Yes EtNo I# O,{~ I RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A ("NO-WAKE") MARKER ON LAKE CHESDIN, A CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC WATERWAY WHEREAS, Section 29.1-744 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, allows persons to request the establishment of "no-wake" zones on public waterways by submitting an application to the County for placement of"no-wake" markers; and WHEREAS, state law further requires that the County forward the application to the State Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for final approval; and WHEREAS, Martin B. McNulty, on behalf of several Eagle Cove Subdivision property owners, has submitted an application for a "no-wake" maker on the cove between Oak River Court and Ivan Road, all locations within Lake Chesdin, a public waterway located in Chesterfield County; and WHEREAS, Mr. McNulty's application explains that the "no-wake" markers are needed for safety and ecological reasons, as well as to prevent the destruction of personal property; and WHEREAS, the County adopted an ordinance allowing for the establishment of"no wake" zones on May 26, 1999; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed and held on June 23, 1999 to receive public comment on Mr. McNulty's application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County that the application for a regulatory marker ("no-wake") on Lake Chesdin as described fully in the attached application shall be forwarded with the approval of this Board to the Director of the State Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for final approval. 0414:44186.1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TI-[E CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 14-25RELATING TO LAKE CHESDIN BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 14-25 of the Code o_f the Coun~ of Chester_field, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 14-25. Lake Chesdin, restrictions on recreational or other use. OOO Any person desiring to place "no wake" buoys along waterways in the County shall first obtain approval from the Board of Supervisors and the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries (the "Department"). A completed "Application for Establishment of Regulatory_ Markers on Public Waters of Virginia," available from the Department, shall be submitted to the Board. After notice and a public hearing, the Board shall vote to approve or disapprove the application. If the Board approves the request, the application shall be forwarded to the Department for final approval. All markers approved by the Board and authorized by the Department shall be installed and maintained at no expense to the Board or Department and shall conform to the specifications, standards and conditions established by the Department. Any person who violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $50.00. This section shall not apply to any person performing any official duty pertaining to the operation or maintenance of Lake Chesdin or the George F. Brasfield Dam, the enforcement of this section, or any law-enforcement or emergency rescue duties. 2014:44418.1 Chesterfield County Admin/.strator P.O. Box 40 Chesterfield, VA. 23832 21 December 1998 Dear Mr. Lane B. Ramsey, I request your assistance in obtaining authority to phce a standard SLOW - NO WAKE Regulating Markcr at the entrance to our cove/n Lake Chesd/n between the Eagle Cove cul-de-sacs of Oak River Court and Ivan Road, as depicted on the atla~ed sketches. Justification for this request is to reduce the fast mftic of undisciplined boaters, including some sport fishermen, who do not decelerate until well inside the mouth of the cove and often leave the cove at nearly full throttle. This recklessness results in the following: a. E'~reme danger to swimmers in the cove. b. Excessive errosion due to the high wakes so close to the shore of the cove as well as an increase of silt in the water which othenvise would be much clearer. c. Potential damage to cove-moored boats which, though secured, are tossed about unnecessarily against thief pie.rs due to high wakes. d. An unnecessay increase in noise levels I would supply the marker and, as displayed in an attachment, I would anchor it no further into the lake than behind a line. between the point of my lot #79 and the point of lot #33 across the cove and approximately 125 feet t~om each point. If any further data is required please contact me at my home address below or at my home telephone #804-590-2101. Respectfully, Martin P McNulty 20238 Oak River Ct Petersburg, Va. 23803 COMMONWEALTH OF VIKGINIA ~'~P~TMENT OF GAME AND INLA~ FISHERIES Application for Establishment of Regulatory Markers on Public Waters of Virginia Date of Application 2~ t ~ t q tl/ Proposed Date of Installation A. APPLICANT 1. Name of Political Subdivision or Agency Telephone Number Name and address of individual to be responsible for installation and maintenance m/~/~-T'/'~ fi ~c-/,Jac'c'~ DayfimeTelephoneNumbe<~ B. NECESSITY OF REASON FOB. REQUESTED MARKERS 1. Attach a letter addressed to Boating Coordinator, Deparnnent of Game and inland Fisheries, Box I1104, Richmond, VA-23230, explaining conditions which make such markers necessary. 2. Political subdivision- attach a copy of the imblic notice and proposed regulation or ordinance, which has b~n issued prior to this application. C. LOCATION OF MARKERS -Body of Water 1. Attach a copy ora map, chart section, or drawing to a scale which will readily depict the proposed zoned area to ks surroundings showing the location of each marker to be placed in the water and its. relation to neativ7 channels and water patterns. Have inset or attachment showing type of marker to be used at each location. D. MARKERS - Type and Number of Markers 1. All markers must conform to spedfication as listed in Rules for Establishment of Uniform Kegulatory Markers. State below names of manufacturer ofcommemial markers that will be used, or, ii'obtained otherwise, indicate source. E. CEKT/FICATION The applicant hereby a~ees and c:rtifies that 'ail markers authorized by the Department will be installed and maintained at no expense to the Department; that all such markers will conform to the · specifications, standards and conditions as set forth in "Kules for Establishment of State Uniform Kegulatory Markers on Public Waters of Virginia" and may be inspected at any time, without prior notice, by authorized personnel. Should markers not be maintained in satisfactory condition, the Department may order them removed at no expense to the Department. The applicant agrees that the Depmm,ent of Game and Inland l~shefiez will not be held liable with respect to any and all claims that may result from the installation and maintenance of tach markers and the marking of any waters does not convey any exclusive privileges. (Title) INSTRUCTIONS: Mail this application with mpporting documents to: Boating Education Coordinator, Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Box l 1104, Richmond, VA'~230-1104 0 0 0 > o o n~ Or~ m~ Z ' o_<~ 0~ 0 X 2.04 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Item Number: 8.D.6.e. Page 1 ofl Subject: Set a Date for a Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Designating the Capital Area Training Consortium ("CATC") as the Temporary Service Provider for the Workforce Investment Act Coun .ty Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve setting a public heating on June 23, 1999 to consider an ordinance for the temporary designation of CATC as the service provider for the Workforce Investment Act by approving the attached resolution. Summary_ of Information: Ihe Federal Workforce Investment Act of 1998 ("WIA") which replaces The Job Partnership and Training Act ("JTPA") requires that each locality designate its service provider by July 1, 1999. the WIA includes provisions that encourage providing services on a regional basis. The Greater Richmond area has two service delivery entities: CATC and the City of Richmond's Private Industry Council. To study and facilitate forming one service delivery area, the Chamber of Commerce and local governments in Planning District 21 are analyzing the feasibility of consolidating Private Industry Council boards, administrative entities and/or programs. A facilitator/consultant has been employed by the Chamber's Workforce 1 to assist this study process. It is anticipated that this study process will be on-going through the summer. Staff will keep the Board informed regarding progress. I'o comply with the WIA, staff recommend that the Board designate CATC as the County's temporary service >rovider until some consensus can be reached at the regional level. Bradford S. Hammer Attachments: Title: Deputy Coun _ty Administrator Yes ~-~No [# ~ft~ ] AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY A MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT AREA AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has enacted and the President of the United States has signed into law the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (the "Act"); and, WHEREAS, the Act, Chapter 2, Section 116, Local Workforce Investment Areas, part (3) requires that the Govemor of the Commonwealth of Virginia approve any request made by a combination of units of local government with a population of 200,000 or more that was a service delivery area under the Job Training Partnership Act (the "JTPA") on the day before the date of enactment of the Act, if the Governor determines that the area: Performed successfully, in each of the last two years prior to the request for which data are available, in the delivery of services to participants under Part A of Title II and Title III of the JTPA; and, Has sustained the fiscal integrity of the funds used by the area to carry out activities under such part and title; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to continue the Capital Area Training Consortium (the "Consortium") created by agreement among the counties of Charles City, Chesterfield, Goochland, Hanover, Henrico, New Kent, and Powhatan (collectively the "parties") dated June 27, 1983, for the purpose of delivering workforce services under the Workforce Investment Act; and, WHEREAS, continuation of the Consortium among the parties will permit continuation of effective participation in the planning and delivery of workforce services in partnership with the Workforce Investment Board that shall be appointed by the Consortium; and, WHEREAS, continuation of the Consortium Area as the Workforce Development Area will permit continuation of the delivery and oversight ofworkforce services in a manner that will ensure continued accountability to local elected and appointed officials, as well as the Workforce Investment Board; and, WHEREAS, for these and other reasons, it is both necessary and appropriate that the parties provide jointly for the planning and delivery of workforce services through a multi-jurisdictional agreement. . .06 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA: That the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator are authorized to execute on behalf of the County the multi-jurisdictional agreement for the planning and delivery of workforce services, such agreement to be in a form approved by the County Attomey. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption. 0505:44892.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D. 7.a. Subject: Transfer $2,000 in Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to the Transportation Department to Acquire Right of Way for Construction of Sidewalks on Salem Church Road CounW Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Transfer $2,000 in Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to the Transportation Department to acquire right of way for construction of sidewalks on Salem Church Road. Summary_ of Information: Supervisor Daniel requests that the Board transfer $2,000 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to the Transportation Department to acquire right of way for construction of sidewalks on Salem Church Road. This is an appropriate use of public funds since the sidewalk will be part of the public transportation system. The balance in the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund account is $28,124; use of $2,000 for this request will leave an available balance of $26,124. Preparer: Rebecca Dickson Title: Director, Budget and Management 0421:44689.1 Attachments: W Yes THREE CENT ROAD FUND This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for,funding with Three Cent Road Funds· Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as Three Cent Road Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? .If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) What is the amount of funding you are seeking? .. Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. u Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 0407:23380.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 2 AGENDA Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.7. b. Subject: Transfer $985 from the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department for Printing and Publicity Costs Associated With the James River Days Brochure County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Transfer $985 from the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department for printing and publicity costs associated with the James River Days brochure. Summary_ of Information: The Parks and Recreation Department in conjunction with Henrico County, the City of Richmond and the James River Task Force sponsors the annual James River Days celebration. A brochure will be printed which will list the 60+ educational and recreational events to be held on the James River throughout the month of June. Mr. McHale requests that $985 of Bermuda District Three Cent Road funds be transferred to the Parks and Recreation Department to pay a portion of the printing costs. The remaining printing and other publicity costs will be shared by Henrico County and the City of Richmond. This is an appropriate use of public funds since this is an established County recreational program. Continued Preparer: L~Y~.{.,~ t T ' '~'~I' ~ ~'''~ Title: Rebecca Dickson 0421:44840.1 Attachments: 1 Yes [] No Director, Budget and Management I# iii I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summa~ of Information: The balance in the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund account is $5,337; use of $985 for this request as well as $700 for the James River Festival of Lights Program will leave an available balance of $3,652. THREE CENT ROAD FUND This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with Three Cent Road Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as Three Cent Road Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Aisc attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to~~~U~"t'~ '~' V)'-'-~.-~ ~ _--- .---~---~:~__.~-'- application.) What is the amount of funding you are seeking? Describe in detail the funding request and h~w~ t_he ~ney_if a[~j~ovec~, will be spent. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 0407:23380.1 Page 2 If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? What is the telephone number, fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? Yes No Yes No Yes No Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman or vice- Signat[~re x,.._../~ v Title (if signing on he_half ~'f an organization) Printed Name 0407:23380.1 2.1.4 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 ltem Number: 8.D.7.c. Subject: Transfer $700 from the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to Defray the Cost of Expanding the James River Parade of Lights Program County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Transfer $700 from the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to defray the cost of expanding the James River Parade of Lights program. Summary of Information: Supervisor McHale requests that the Board transfer $700 from the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to defray the cost of expanding the James River Parade of Lights Program. This program was expanded to include an additional site, longer hours, shuttle bus service and more entertainment. This is an appropriate use of County funds since it expands an established County program. The balance in the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund account is $5,337; use of $700 for this request as well as $985 for the James River Days brochure will leave an available balance of $3,652. Preparer: Rebecca Dickson Attachments: I Yes [] No Title: Director, Budget and Management 0421:44839.1 THREE CENT ROAD FUND APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with Three Cent Road Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as Three Cent Road Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding request? If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) 0 ' 0 What is the amount of funding you are seeking? Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remain~der of the funding? 0407:23380.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA 1 1 Page__of__ Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D. 7.d Subject: Transfer of $1,000 from the Bermuda Magisterial District Three Cent Road Fund and $1,000 from the Midlothian District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to Purchase Football Field Equipment for Carver Middle School County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Transfer $1,000 from the Bermuda Magisterial District Three Cent Road Fund and $1,000 from the Midlothian District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to purchase football field equipment for Carver Middle School. Summary_ of Information: Supervisors McHale and Barber request the Board to transfer $1,000 from the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund and $1,000 from the Midlothian District Three Cent Road Fund to the Parks and Recreation Department to purchase football field equipment for Carver Middle School. The funds will be used to purchase yard markers, goal post pads, measuring chains and other equipment for the football field. This request was originally made by the Chesterfield Metro Youth Football League. The County is legally precluded from donating funds to athletic organizations such as the Metro Youth Football League. However, the County can expend public funds to purchase equipment to improve and use County-owned property. All of the equipment will be owned by the County. The balance in the Bermuda District Three Cent Road Fund account is $5,337. Use of $1,000 for this request as well as $985 for the James River Days brochure and $700 for the James River Parade of Lights Program will leave an available balance of $2,652. The balance in the Midlothian District Three Cent Road Fund account is $30,439. Use ora total of $1,000 for this request will leave an available balance of $29,439. Preparer: ~~(~{" '~ ['~/~'-3 Title: Rebecca T. Dickson Attachments: ~ Yes [] No Director, Budget and Management 0407:44914.1 I# THREE CENT ROAD FUND APPLICATION This application must be completed and signed before the County can consider a request for funding with Three Cent Road Funds. Completing and signing this form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the County can legally consider your request. Virginia law places substantial restrictions on the authority of the County to give public funds, such as Three Cent Road Funds, to private persons or organizations and these restrictions may preclude the County's Board of Supervisors from even considering your request. m What is the name of the applicant (person or organization) making this funding . request? If an organization is the applicant, what is the nature and purpose of the organization? (Also attach organization's most recent .articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to application.) .. What is the amount of funding you are ~ seeking? Describe in detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other individuals or organizations will provide the remainder of the funding? 0407:23380.! Page 2 If applicant is an organization, answer the following: Is the organization a corporation? Is the organization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? Yes No Yes / No Yes No 7/7 What is the telephone number, fax number, e-mail address of the applicant? Signature of applicant. If you are signing on behalf of an organization you must be the president, vice-president, chairman or vice- Signature F - i~le (i signing o e a o an organiza~on) Printed Name 0407:23380.1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page ]_ of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.7.o. Subject: Transfer $2,810 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to the School Board to Purchase Various Equipment for the Meadowbrook J.R.O.T.C. Program County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Transfer $2,810 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to be donated to the School Board to purchase various equipment for the Meadowbrook High School J.R.O.T.C. program. Summary_ of Information: Supervisor Daniel has requested that the Board transfer $2,810 from the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund to purchase equipment to be used in the Meadowbrook High School J.R.O.T.C. program. J.R.O.T.C is a school program which receives cooperative support from the U.S. Army. It is not a military recruitment program but is designed to teach young people leadership skills, motivational skills and discipline. The equipment that will be purchased includes flag poles; trophies and plaques which will be owned by the School Board and displayed permanently on school property; crests, patches, cords and berets that will be part of the school-owned uniforms; and rifle pads for the ceremonial rifles which are owned by the School Board. All of this equipment will be purchased by the School Board directly from a vendor and is estimated to cost $2,810. The equipment will be and will remain School Board property. Preparer: The balance in the Dale District Three Cent Road Fund account is $28,124; use of $2,810 to purchase this equipment for the J.R.O.T.C. program will leave an available balance of $25,314. , ~4(_ I C~-,~yw-"X Title: Director, Budget and Management Rebecca Dickson 0421:44932.1 Attachments: ~lYes E3No I# I MA¥--25--99 ~.l ~--- P. 0~ This oppl;catJon must be completed end ~gned before ~e County can consider s request for.funding wl~ Three Cent Road Funds..completing ~nd signlng ~is form does not mean that you will receive funding or that the Coun~ ~n legally consider you~ request. Virginia law places substand;I res~lctions on ~e au~orl~ of ~e Coun~ to give public funds, such as ~ree Cent Road Funds, to private persons or organTze~ans and ~ese res=lctions may prectude the CounW's ~ard of Supe~tsors bom even considering your request. What is the name of the applicant (person Or organization) making this funding request? e .If an organization is the applicant, what the nature and purpose of the organiza, tion? {Also attach organization's most recent articles of incorporation and/or bylaws to aP~.l~Cati°n2) /) // What is the amount of funding you are seeking? Describe In detail the funding request and how the money, if approved, will be spent. ff Is any County Department involved in the project, event or program for which you are seeking funds? If this request for funding will not fully fund your activity or program, what other lndlvlduals' or organizations will Provide ... the remainder of the funding? _ . ! MAY-25-1999 ~.1:49 95~ P. 02 MAY -25--99 if eppficant Is an organization, answer the following: Is the'organizatl(~n a corporation? Is the orgenization non-profit? Is the organization tax-exempt? Yes No _- Yes ~ No_ ~_ Yes ~ No What is the address of the applicant making this funding request? What is the telephone number, fax nun~ber, e-mail address of the applicant? Signature of ~plicant. if you are signing on behalf of an organ;zation you must be the president, vice-pres;dent, chairman or vice- chairman of rganiz~tion. . ~ / ~"~e (If ~g~ing on beha]f"of ~n orgahlzatlon) Printed Name MRY-25-1999 li: 50 95Z TOT~_ P. ['t5 P. 03 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.8. Subject: Consideration of Amendment to Towing Services Contract to Set Maximum Rates Recommended by the Towing Advisory Board County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Approve towing services contract and rates recommended by the Towing Advisory Board. Summary_ of Information: The Board of Supervisors appointed a Towing Advisory Board in 1993 to advise the Board with regard to appropriate provisions for the form of towing service contract the Police Department has used since 1982. The contract is used with any towing company that wishes to be placed on the Police Department list. Companies are called on a rotating basis as the need arises. The contract used by the Police Department in the past has not established maximum permitted rates, and each towing company has charged the public different rates when called by the Police for service. The Advisory Board recently undertook an examination of the various rates towing contractors have been charging the public and discovered a wide discrepancy in rates and some at an unreasonable level. Accordingly, the Advisory Board determined that the form contract used by the Police should establish a maximum fee schedule to ensure the public is charged reasonable rates. The Advisory Board undertook a thorough examination of the going rates charged in the community and has determined that the proposed maximum rates are fair and reasonable. Staff recommends approval of the proposed fee schedule as part of the form contract. Preparer: Steven L. Micas Attachments: Il Yes [] No Title: County Attorney 0614:44822.~ - Addendum D- *Nighttime rates are effective between the hours of 10:00 pm and 6:00 am. These are the maximum allowable charges to citizens as determined by the Towing Advisory Board for 1999. No other fees are permitted without prior approval of the Towing Advisory Board, IE "loading fees". By signing this document you agree to accept these fees for any Chesterfield County Police originated call under the contract. Each vendor may charge less for their services. Speciality equipment; IE "air cushions", cranes, etc. are not included in this list. Each vendor should inform the vehicle owner, ff possible, of approximate cost for such speciality equipment prior to utilization. Service Day *Night* 1. Towing wrecked automobiles and light trucks/accidents. $ 75.00 $ 85.00 2. Towing disabled automobiles and light trucks. $ 55.00 $ 65.00 3. Towing wrecked privately owned vans, unloaded dump $ 85.00 $ 95.00 trucks, delivery vehicles and other medium weight trucks - accidents. 4. Towing disabled privately owned vans, unloaded dump $ 65.00 $ 75.00 trucks, delivery vehicles and other medium weight trucks. 5. Towing wrecked privately owned buses and heavy $185.00 $195.00 trucks; e.g. cement trucks, tractor-trailers, loaded dump trucks, etc. - accidents. (Basic rate per hour) 6. Towing disabled privately owned buses and heavy ' $125.00 $135.00 trucks; e.g. cement trucks, tractor-trailers, loaded dump trucks, etc. (Basic rate per hour) 7. Charge for disconnecting drive shaft/transmission $10.00 $10.00 8. Storage charge per day. (Prorate less than 24hfs) $ 20.00 $ 20.00 9. Charge for use of dollies. $ 35.00 $ 35.00 10. Charge for use of winch for vehicle offroad or $ 45.00 $ 45.00 overturned. 11. Charges per mile over five (3) miles from pickup site if $ 2.00 $ 2.00 to location other than your tow lot. Yn~r .qiEnntlire. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page lof 3 Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8. D. 9. Subject: Contract Award for the Jury Drive and Lori Road Relocated Project and Authorization to Purchase Lori Road Relocated Right-of-Way ,County Administrator's Comments- County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to award a contract for the Jury Drive and Lori Road Relocated Project and to authorize the purchase of right-of-way for the Lori Road Relocated Project. Summary of information: Jury Drive and Lori Road relocated will provide access to the Juvenile Court and Government Center Complex. Bids for the construction of the roads will be received on May 18, 1999. Staff will submit a bid analysis for the Board's consideration at the Board meeting. The project is estimated to cost approximately $2 million. Previously, $750,000 of County funds has been designated for the project. To provide the additional funding for the project, $350,000 should be transferred from the General Road Improvements Account and $550,000 should be transferred from the Industrial Road Access Account to the Jury Drive Project with the understanding the account will be repaid July 1, 1999, from the General Road Improvement Account. The Board should also appropriate $350,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements for the Project. In order to construct Lori Road Relocated approximately 0.854 acre of right-of-way must be acquired from Myers Family Partnership, L.P. The County's appraisal and offer for the right-of-way was $87,500. Myers made a counter offer of $96,500. To avoid condemnation and to avoid litigation costs, staff recommends the County accept Myers' counter offer. If the Board chooses to accept Myers' offer, the public hearing to consider the exercise of eminent domain for the acquisition of the right-of-way would no longer be necessary. 1~. McCrack~n&_~- Agen397 Attachments: Ye s Title: Director of Transportation CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Recommendation- Staff recommends the Board: 1) Authorize the award of the construction contract to Shoosmith Brothers, Inc. in the amount of $1,440,329.00; 2) Approve the purchase of approximately 0.854 acre of right-of-way for the Loft Road Relocated project and authorize the Administrator to execute the contract and deed; 3) Appropriate $350,000 in anticipated VDOT reimbursements for the project; 4) Transfer $350,000 from the General Road Improvement Account for the project; and 5) Transfer $550,000 from the Industrial Road Access Account with the understanding the account will be reimbursed from the General Road Improvement Account after July 1, 1999. District: Dale CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: May 2s, 1~)~) Number Bud,qet and Manaqement Comments: This request is for award of the construction contract in the amount of $1,440,329 for Jury Drive and Lori Road Relocated Project, anticipated VDOT revenue appropriations in the amount of $350,000, and transfer of $900,000 from the General Road Improvement and Industrial Access accounts. Staff is requesting transfer of $350,000 from the General Road Improvements Account and $550,000 from the Industrial Access Account. Sufficient funds are available in each of these accounts to accomplish these transfers. Transfer from the Industrial Access Account is an interim measure to enable award of the contract. After July 1St, this account would be replenished with funds available in the General Road Improvements Account. These actions coupled with the current budget allocation of $850,000 will be sufficient to construct the Jury Drive and Lori Road Relocated project. This project budget allows for costs associated with this road construction and provides a $180,000 contingency for unforeseen expenses. Preparer: ~ ['_ /'(-f ~ Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Bud,qet & Manaqement JURY DRIVE AND LORI ROAD RELOCATED May 18, 1999, BID RESULTS CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID Shoosmith $1,440,329 Godsey and Son $1,764,952 Shirley Contracting $1,783,800 Buckanan $1,785,504 ATTACHMENT A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION BUDGET Preliminary Engineering $120,000 Right-of-Way $115,000 Utility Relocation $80,000 Bid $1,440,329 Construction Contingency $180,371 Construction Administration $5,500 Construction Engineering $58,800 Total $2,000,000 APPROPRIATIONS/TRANSFERS 8/27/97 APPROPRIATION $750,000 COUNTY GENERAL FUNDS - JUVENILE COURT PROJECT 5/25/99 TRANSFER $350,000 GENERAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT ACCOUNT 5/25/99 TRANSFER $550,000 INDUSTRIAL ACCESS ACCOUNT- TO BE REPAID 7/1/99 5/25/99APPROPRIATION $350,000 ANTICIPATED VDOT REIMBURSEMENTS Total $2,000,000 ATTACHMENT B ~ LOCATION 1 '=650' MAP CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8. D. 10. Subject: Authorize the County Administrator to Execute a Construction Contract for Bensley Park Community Center Addition and Wentworth Street Extended County_ Administrator's Comments; County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to authorize the County Administrator to execute a construction contract with Brooks and Company, General Contractor, Inc., in the amount of $465,400 for work at Bensley Park to construct an addition to the existing community center, new parking lot and the Wentworth Street connector road. Summary of Information: This project will expand the existing community center multi-purpose space by 3,565 square feet and develop a 53 car parking lot immediately adjacent to the center. This will result in a facility similar in size to the Ettrick Community Center. The project will also improve access to the main park entrance by extending Wentworth Street from Swineford to Drewry's Bluff Road, bypassing an acute angle intersection. The project is funded through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). The contract has been structured contingent on this remaining appropriation and transfer in FY2000. Preparer: [}-"~ ~ ~-----J'..~ .. Title: Michael S. Golden Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: Yes ~-~ No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meetina Date: May 25. 1999 Number Bud.qet and Manaqement Comments: This request is to award the construction contract in the amount of $465,400 for the addition to the Bensley Park Community Center. This project will expand the multi-purpose room by 3,565 square feet, develop a 53 car parking lot, and improve the access to the main park entrance by extending Wentworth Street. The construction is being fully funded by Community Development Block Grant funds from FY98, FY99, and FY2000. Upon transfer of CDBG funds from two completed projects (from FY96 and FY99), the project budget will total $614,700 and provide a contingency amount of $87,072 for unforeseen expenses. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Bud,qet & Manaqement ~G e +G~o -i-Bo ~o ~om CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ~ of ! Meetin~Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.11.c. Subject: Approval of Utility Contract for Jessup Farms, Section D & Section B (Portion of) Contract Number 98-0352 County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this contract and authorize the County Administrator to execute any necessary documents. Summary_ of Information: This project includes the extension of 530 L.F.± of 12" additional water lines; 245 L.F.± of 6" offsite water improvements; and 450 L.F.± of 12" oversized water lines. This project also includes 230 L.F.± of 8" offsite wastewater lines and 248 L.F.± of 6" sewer laterals to those lots not owned by the developer. Staff has requested that the additional water lines be installed to improve service to the existing areas and to oversize the developer's onsite water improvements to provide service to the adjoining properties. In accordance with the ordinance, the developer is entitled to refunds for the cost of the addtional work, oversizing and offsite improvements. /J. E. Beck~ Jr. Title: Assistant Director Attachments: YesI CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ~ of ~ Summary of Information: (Continued) Developer: Contractor: Jessup Farms, L.C. & Brookstone Associates, L.C. Excalibur Construction Corporation Contract Amount: Estimated Total - $128,698.00 Total Estimated County Cost: Water (Oversizing) Water (Off-Site) Wastewater (Off-Site) Water (Additional Work) $4,939.00 $4,315.75 $5,704.00 $18,822.00 Estimated Developer Cost $94,917.25 Code: Refund thru connections: Additional Work & Off-Site - Additional Work & Off-Site - Oversizing - Water Water Wastewater 5B-572VO-E4D 5N-572VO-E4D 5B-572VO-E4C District: Dale -CONTRACT NUMBER 98-0352 RT '~01 5150 8 JESSUP FARMS SECTION D & SECTION B (PORTION OF) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.12. Subject: Approval of a Contract to Purchase a One Acre Parcel of Land for the County's Emergency Communications System from Thomas S. Winston, III, Trustee County Administrator's Comments: Connty Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a contract to purchase a one acre parcel of land along Bermuda Hundred Road for one of the towers for the County's Emergency Communications System and authorize the County Administrator to execute the contract and deed. Summary_ of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a contract to purchase a one acre parcel of land along Bermuda Hundred Road for one of the towers for the County's Emergency Communications System from Thomas S. Winston, III, Trustee for $50,000. Funds for the purchase and associated closing costs are available in the project budget. The purchase is contingent on zoning and substantial accord approval. Approval is recommended. District: Bermuda John W. Harmon Attacb_ments: Yes Title: Right of Way Manaqer CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page _1 of _1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.13. Subject: Award of the Contract for Autumn Oaks Water Line Extension - Project Number 98-0340E County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Staff requests the Board award contract number 98-0340E to Gerald K. Moody, Inc. T/A Southern Construction Company in the amount of $379,880.31 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: This project is associated with the ~Autumn Oaks/Chalkley Road Area Special Tax or Assessment Water District" which was created by the Board of Supervisors on September 23, 1998 at a public hearing. This project includes the installation of 1,087 L.F. of 16"; 3,351 L.F. of 12"; 240 L.F. of 8"; and 1,149 L.F. of 6" water lines to serve the residents in Autumn Oaks. The bids ranged from $379,880.31 to $608,426.00. Our consultant, Austin Brockenbrough and Associates, has reviewed the bids and recommends awarding the project to the lowest bidder, Gerald K. Moody, Inc. T/A Southern Construction Company in the amount of $379,880.31. Funds for the project were appropriated by the Board on September 23, 1998 from the water fund balance. Assistant Director Attachments: Yes [--~ No ~40 CONTRACT NUMBER 98-02 JE ~x ,~SCR f' 2 ~ ALE WEST HS AUTU~IN OAKS WATER LINE EXTENSION CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.14.a. Subject: Request to Install a Private Water Service Within a 15' Private Easement for a New Residence at 1200 Austin Road County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve a request to install a private water service for a new residence at 1200 Austin Road and authorize the County Administrator to execute the water connection agreement. Summary of Information: George Warren Shepard and Jamie Massey Shepard have submitted a request to install a private water service within a 15' private easement to serve their new residence at 1200 Austin Road. This request has been reviewed and staff recommends approval. District: Bermuda Preparer: g~hn W. Harmon Attachments: YesI INo Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST TO INSTALL A PRIVATE WATER SERVICE WITHIN A 15' PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR A NEW RESIDENCE AT 1200 AUSTIN ROAD GEORGE WARREN SHEPARD AND JAMIE MASSEY SHEPARD PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 49, RIVERTON SUBDIVISION, SECTION B JAMES & JULIE HARPER \ / 143 210.00' ~ -N87 -15'-Ol"W / \ I \ / George warrm / Jamle Massey _~-/~'-50' Radius ~ PARCEL 2 wa~e c. Walpole & ~ Sallie R. Wal~le w 1,331 ACRES PARCEL 3 GPIN 823~2091~ 12~ Austin Road 3.140 ACRES DB ~91,pg 956 GPIN 823~2~13~ 1201 Austin Road DB 2924,pg 81 Plat Showing Public & Private Utility Easement Across Parcel 1 Formerly Tax Parcel 151-4-(1)-16 & 151-4-(1)-28 North Side of Point of Rocks Rd. Bermuda District, Chesterfield County, Virginia , SECTION// 15' x 10' ~ide Public Waterlln~ Easement .... ~--2~'~F~ ~.67' 21 ]: -~ ~ E 11,.3,189,551 William David Sto~, & Sallie O, Robens Susan E. ~o~ 2,000 . 7 'A6 Es REMAINING ~oad 1210 Austin ~ ~ I GPIN 823~23~6~ 1211 Austin Road 2137,pg - '~ 0~ DB 2742,pg 165 DB 1397 Waterline Easement , ~ N 335.427 E 11,823,210.761 Walter M. Altman III Certified Land Surveyor Chesterfield County, Virginia Date: April 21, 1999 Scale: 1" = 100' 144 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.14.b. Subject: Request Permission to Construct a Wooden Walkway and Gazebo Within a Proposed SWM/BMP Easement County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant Watermill Properties, L.L.C. permission to construct a wooden walkway and gazebo within a proposed SWM/BMP easement; subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary_ of Information: Watermill Properties, L.L.C. has requested permission to construct a wooden walkway and gazebo within a proposed SWM/BMP easement. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Attact~aents: Yes ~No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT A WOODEN WALKWAY AND GAZEBO WITHIN A PROPOSED SWM/BMP EASEMENT WATER~gIILL PROPERTIES, L.L.C. NORTH HUNDRED PAR (PROPOS;ED) D MEAD( BRANDERMI ACROPOLIS OFC PK -- C~ I CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page. 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D%14.¢. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a Portion of a 20' SWM/BMP Access Easement Across the Property of Ukrop's Super Markets, Inc., a Virginia Corporation County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute a quitclaim deed to vacate a portion of 20' SWM/BMP access easement across the property of Ukrop's Super Markets, Inc. Summary_ of Information: Ukrop's Super Markets, Inc. has requested the quitclaim of a portion of a 20' access SWM/BMP easement across its property as shown on the attached plat. A new easement will be dedicated to replace this portion of easement. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval. District: Dale Prepare~ -'~J. Attachments: Yes ~--~No Title: Right of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A PORTION OF A 20' SWM/BMP ACCESS EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF UKROP'S SUPER MARKETS, INC., A VIRGINIA CORPORATION HO, ME W^T, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.16.d. Subject: Request to Quitclaim a 16' Water Easement and a Portion of a 16 Sewer Easement Situated West of Alverser Drive County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute quitclaim deeds to vacate a 16' water easement and a portion of a 16' sewer easement situated west of Alverser Drive as shown on the attached plat. Summary_ of Information: Huestis Limited Company and Carmike Cinemas, Inc., have requested the quitclaim of a 16' water easement and a portion of a 16' sewer easement west of Alverser Drive as shown on the attached plat. New easements will be dedicated to replace these easements. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval. District: Midlothian ~ohn W. Harmon Attachments: YesI INo Title: Riqht of Way Manager VICINITY SKETCH REQUEST TO QUITCLAIM A 16' WATER EASEMENT AND A PORTION OF A 16' SEWER EASEMENT SITUATED WEST OF ALVERSER DRIVE INPIKI .G~f:JOYNVrt NOLL0i"I~IISNO0 ,, ~LNVI]~SNO0 $1qiLSXS~NOIL¥t~O;fl~I OTH~.30 ,,, .Td. SU..N3LgS "lVJ. I'~IHICO~A~G , SLODJ. II.IDIdV 3clY3SONg'l , S:~OA.-~tI~ ,, .T~D~'"'II-IO~ -J < CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: Max/ 25, 1999 Item Number: 8. o. 14. e. Subject: Request Permission For a Sign to Encroach Within an Existing Water Easement County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant Old Stage, Inc. permission to have a sign encroach within an existing water easement; subject to the execution of a license agreement. Summary_ of Information: Holiday Signs, Inc. has requested permission to have a sign encroach within an existing water easement as shown on the attached plat. This request has been reviewed by staff and concerns regarding sight distance and the signs location within the water easement have been addressed. District: Bermuda Preparer: o~~hn W .'~H2r~~~ Attacb_ments: YesI INo Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer ~way wooo lion Chester CHESTEi STA HEMLOCK t PLAC ,;r L AREA TO BE LICENSED l'-l/Xl,-1C'f _E>. WAITIKU~5 D.~. ~,-1'7 PG 7'55 TAX ~v~/,,,p klO. II~-O~-OG-OO-OQ-OI~,D PL~T OF I~ I ~ 1172~ IG/?. P-.I~',TE~' LIt-.IE. ~-A~M~I'-.~T ALOI,,IG TI-IF_. KICIZTkl LII',IE~F- ~TATE r~TEo I~ DEEH, U~A, F IST~ lcT* dH ~ST~F ]E Lr~ d~,,., vX. AUSTIN BROCKENBROUGH & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS / LAND SURVEYORS CHESTER , VIRGINIA inn 4, 0'-7. C~--,' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.15. Subject: Vacation and Re-dedication of a Water Easement Across the Property of Tascon-Buckingham Wood, L.P., a Virginia Limited Partnership County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to execute a water easement agreement for the vacation and re-dedication of a water easement across the property of Tascon-Buckingham Wood, L.P. Summary_ of Information: On September 3, 1998 a water easement agreement, was recorded in deed book 3395, page 683, which conveyed a water easement according to a plat by Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated June 29, 1998 and revised August 10, 1998 and August 28, 1998; however, the easement should have been granted according to a plat by Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated June 29, 1998, and revised August 10, 1998, August 28, 1998 and January 15, 1999. The relocation of this easement has been reviewed by staff approval is recommended. District: Midlothian J~hn W. Harmon Attach_merits: YesI INo Title: Right of Way Manager VICINITY SKETCH VACATION AND RE-DEDICATION OF A WATER EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY OF TASCON-BUCKINGHAM WOOD, L.P., A VIRGINIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Pon ~NPIKE NCHWAY CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 2S, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.16. Subject: Change Order.#7 for County Project #88-0161R Improvements - Safe Drinking Water Act and Amendments County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board approve Change Order #7 for a decrease of $60,775.00 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents. Summary of Information: A contract was established with the engineer, Hazen and Sawyer, to address compliance with the 1986 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) for the Swift Creek Water Treatment Plant. This contract was initiated with a base scope and addendums (change orders) were added as regulatory developments occurred. Several projects related to the SDWA have been completed. The remaining professional engineering services from this firm are not required. This change order reflects adjustments of estimated fees and services utilized during these projects. This change order will closeout the purchase order with our consultant, Hazen and Sawyer. Preparer: ~ ~. ~d/~~ Title: RoyCE. Covin~on, P.E. Assistant Director of Utilities Attachments: Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.17.a. Subject: Conveyance of Easements to Triton PCS Property Company L.L.C., Bell Atlantic-Virginia, Inc. and Virginia Electric and Power Company County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute easement agreements to install communications equipment and underground power and telephone cable in Rockwood Park. Summary of Information: On November 12, 1998 the Board authorized Triton PCS to apply for necessary approvals to install communications equipment on a VEPCo transmission tower in Rockwood Park. All zoning approvals have been obtained. Bell Atlantic and VEPCo require easements to provide service to the facilities. Approval is recommended. District: Clover Hill John W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Right of Way Manaqer PLAI~IORM EXIST OVERHEAD POWER LINES 20' NDE EASEMENT EXIST VE]PCO TRANSMISSION TOWER MONOPOLE ELECTRIC/TELCO BACKBOARD / EXIST POWER POLE ~H-SB I I I / d / / / / / / / / / ! / / / / / / / / / ~/ // EXIST GRAVEL DRIVE //\ / 5' HOE UNDERGROUND ANTENNA CABLE EASEMENT UNDERGROUND ANTENNA CONDUITS lO'-0'xl 2'-O' CONC PAD W~TH BTS GRAVEL SURFACE (MAX 3'-0" FROM CONCRETE PAD) EXIST OVERHEAD PO ,WER LINES. ~ /-- EXIST FIBEROPTICE ./~'x LINE UNDERGROUNO ELECTRIC TO BACKBOARD 10' ~4DE UllUTY EASEMENT ( SITE DETAIL PLAN SCALE: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: $.D.17.B: Subject: Conveyance of an Easement to Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc. County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc. Summary_ of Information: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator to execute an easement agreement with Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc. This easement is needed for the installation of a gas line to serve the Bailey Bridge Road area and the new Spring Run Road Elementary School. This request has been reviewed by County staff and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca · Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer # tG1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8. D. 18. Subject: Approve the Submission of a Federal Drug Court Planning Grant to the Office of Justice Programs CounW Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Community Corrections Services Department to apply for a federal drug court planning grant in the amount of $29,616 through the Office of Justice Programs and appropriate, if received. Summary of Information: This project would provide funding for a multi-disciplinary team to conduct a comprehensive study of the need for a local adult drag court. Funds would be used to determine the need for a local drug court, evaluate various drug court models, assess the current treatment options available in our community, identify the resources that are needed to establish an effective drug court and develop an implementation plan for a drug court program if it is determined that one is needed. The in-kind match of $14,736 will be provided through services performed by the local Criminal Justice Planner. Preparer: Bradford S. Hammer Title: Deputy County Administrator Attachments: Yes No CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meetino Date: May 25. 1999 Number Bud.qet and Mana.qement Comments: This item requests Board approval for the Department of Community Corrections Services to apply for and appropriate, if received, a federal drug court planning grant. This grant will provide funding for a multi-disciplinary team to conduct a comprehensive study of the need for a local adult drug court. Total federal grant funding is $29,616 with a local match totaling $14,736. The local match will be an in- kind match provided through the services of the Criminal Justice Planner and the registration fees for the National Association of Drug Court Professionals annual conference. In addition, additional grant funding will be available from the Federal Government, office of Justice Programs, for the implementation of the drug court, if the multi-disciplinary team determines that the project is feasible and appropriate for Chesterfield County. The team will conduct research and benchmarking for approximately 18 months and may request approval from the Board of Supervisors to apply for the implementation grant. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Bud,qet & Manaqement CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of ~2 Meeting Date: May 2 ~§, :L 9 9 9 Item Number: 8.a. 19, Subject: Consideration of an Application for Continuation of Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities Grant County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Authorize the Police Department to apply for continuation of Office of the Governor Safe and Drug Free Schools grant, and to appropriate the necessary funds when approved. Summary of Information: The continuation grant will fund the salaries of three part-time Child Safety Officers for one year. The Child Safety Officers will be part of the Police Department's Success Through Education and Proactive Policing Program. The program will present safety and drug awareness instruction to students in grades Kindergarten through Five. Federal funding requested in the amount of $32,474 with an in- kind county match of $25,325. Preparer: ~ ~ Title: Co Carl R. Baker Attachments: Yes No Chief of Police CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: Mav 25. 1999 Number Bud.qet and Mana.qement Comments: This item requests Board approval for the Police Department to apply for and appropriate, if received, a continuation for the Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities grant. This grant provides for three part-time Child Safety officers in elementary schools. Grant funding is $32,474 with a local match of $25,325 for funds totaling $57,799. The local match is an in-kind match consisting of instructional videos, uniforms, van and instructional material. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 25, 199~ Item Number: 8.D.20. Subject: Consideration of an Application for Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support Grant County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Authorize the Police Department to apply for the Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support Grant, and to appropriate the necessary funds when approved. Summary of Information: The Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support Grant will fund the initial start of the Police Department's Critical Incident Stress Management Debriefing Team, training for the police department's Chaplain program and contract Chesterfield Mental Health to assess the needs of the police officers and their families dealing with job related stress. Federal funding is requested in the amount of $27,529 with an in-kind match of $30,714 for a total of $58,243. Preparer: ~~~_t_~ Title: Colonel Carl R. Baker Attachments: Yes No Chief of Police CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: GRANT SUMMARY: CORRECTIONS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT FAMILY SUPPORT GRANT The funds from this grant will be utilized in three ways; (1) to initiate the start of the Chesterfield County Police Department's Critical Incident Stress Management Debriefing Team (CISM), (2) training for the police department'sChaplain program in consistency with CISM and (3) contract Chesterfield Mental Health services to assess the needs of on-the-job stress issues that effect the officer and his family. Officers themselves are not the only ones who experience the debilitating effects of stress. Typically, the officer's family, significant others,and co-workers are affected as well. Recognizing that an officer's stress can affect family members and others, and that tlese persons also represent a potential source of support for an officer attempting to cope with stress, many law enforcement agencies have developed stress-reduction programs that include family and peer supporters. During the course of the grant period, the first step will be to develop the CISM Team which is vital in effecting the stress reduction of the police officers and will consist of a police department staff member, trained police officers, and our trained police Chaplains. The Chaplains will also, primarily, be responsible for re-structuring the way police officers handle, or possible not handle, the problems ofj ob-related stress. The Chaplains will help officers and their families realize that it is ok to seek help in dealing with job-related stress, and provideinformation about the resources available to them. The CISM Team will offer "peer" counseling for the officers as well as their families. Finally, during the period of this grant, the police department will collaborate with Chesterfield Mental Health to assess the needs of our officers and their families and make recommendations for effective stress reduction programs and training. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: May 25. 1999 Number Budget and Management Comments: This item requests Board approval for the Police Department to apply for and appropriate, if received, a Corrections and Law Enforcement Family Support grant. This grant will provide funding totaling $27,529 and requires a local match totaling $30,714. This local match is an in-kind match consisting of officer salaries, vehicle operations, and office supplies. The grant funding will provide chaplain training and contract mental health services for police officers and their families to help deal with job related stress. Preparer: /~,L~, ~T'. /~/~/('r,~'~Title: Director, Bud,qet & Mana,qement Rebecca T. Dickson CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.21. Subject: Lease of Property for the County Registrar and Construction Management County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: ~ Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve leases with Court Square, Inc. for 7000 square feet of office space in a proposed building at 9846 Lori Road for the County Registrar and Construction Management and authorize the County Administrator to execute the lease agreements. Summary_ of Information: These leases cover a period of 60 months at a total cost of $549,010.. Rent for the first year of the leases is available in the departments' operating budgets. Payments for future years is subject to annual appropriations by the Board. There is no increase in rent for three years. If the building is not complete within six months of approval by the Board, the lease may be terminated at the County's option. Utilities and custodial services are included. Approval is recommended. District: Dale · Harmon Attachments: ~Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer 17'1 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meetinc~ Date: May 25. 19~)~) Number Bud.qet and Manaqement Comments: Funds are budgeted within the respective departments for payment of the lease. The terms of the lease also include custodial services and utilities; accordingly, the budgeted funds are adequate to cover the lease payments. A full year of lease payments was budgeted in the Registrar's budget. The Registrar will be occupying 5000 square feet in the new building. With the building not being ready for at least six months into the fiscal year, the budgeted excess rent funds can be used to purchase furnishings. Construction Management's budget is also adequate to fund the terms of the lease. Prior year funded lease payments can be used to cover their furnishing and start-up costs. They will be occupying 2000 square feet in the new facility. Other expenses associated with the move and initial start-up include data/telecommunications equipment and wiring. Staff will be identifying/~unds to cover these expenses. Preparer= I/,~/~ ~'~- ~)/i~y~ Title: Director, Bud,qet & Mana,qement Rebecca T. Dickson CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 3 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.22. Subject: Contract Award and Transfer of Funds for the Ashton Creek Business Center Industrial Access Project County_ Administrator's Comments: County. Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board is requested to award a contract and transfer funds for the Ashton Creek Business Center Industrial Access Project. Summary of Information: In February 1998, the Board authorized staff to advertise a road construction contract for the Ashton Creek Business Center Industrial Access Project. The project was advertised April 18, 1999, and bids were received May 10, 1999. J.H. Martin submitted the low base bid of $315,890 and an add alternate bid of $84,980 for a total bid of $400,870. The bid is approximately forty percent (40%) below the County's estimate. The bid results are listed on Attachment A. The project budget is shown on Attachment B. Goodrich River Trust, developer of the Ashton Creek Business Center, has provided the County with $170,500 for matching funds and ineligible reimbursement items. VDOT's practice is to require the County to provide a capital investment surety to cover the VDOT funding for the project. Goodrich River Trust has provided the County with a $437,048 capital investment surety for the project. The County will in turn provide VDOT a surety. Goodrich River Trust has asked the County to assume responsibility for $20,000 of the project costs should sufficient capital investment not occur within VDOT's time requirement. The Department of Economic Development is of the opinion that additional capital investment will occur in the center to satisfy VDOT's requirements. If the investment does not occur, the County would forfeit the $20,000. (Continued next page) y J. McC~acken Title: Agen398 Attachments: Yes [~] No Director of Transportation I# CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 3 Summary. Continued - Ashton Creek Business Center Agenda Item A public hearing is also scheduled for the Board meeting to consider the authorization of eminent domain proceedings to acquire part of the right of way from Roslyn Farms for the access road. If the Board chooses not to authorize the condemnation proceedings, the award of the construction contract should be deferred. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board: l) Award a construction contract to J. H. Martin, subject to the Board's decision on the eminent domain proceedings; and 2) Transfer $437,048 from the Industrial Access Account for the capital investment surety with the understanding the account will be reimbursed upon satisfaction of VDOT's capital investment requirements. District Bermuda CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page3 of 3 Meetina Date: Mav 25. 1999 Number Budget and Mana,clement Comments: This request is for transfer of $437,048 from the Industrial Access Account to cover the capital investment surety (as required by VDOT) for the Ashton Creek Business Center Industrial Access Project. Upon completion of the project, these funds will be returned with the potential deduction of $20,000 if the capital investment requirement is not met. Sufficient funds are available in the Industrial Access Account to cover this transfer. Preparer: Rebecca T. Dickson Title: Director, Bud,qet & Mana,qement May 10, 1999, Bid Summary Ashton Creek Industrial Access Road Contractor Base Bid Add Alternate Total Bid J.H. Martin $315,890.00 $84,980.00 $400,870.00 B.P. Short $339,471.80 $105,605.00 $445,076.80 Buchanan & Rice $390,790.00 $106,476.00 $497,266.00 Bishop & Settle $427,750.00 $130,000.00 $557,750.00 Stanley Construction $435,078.00 $129,185.00 $564,263.00 Powers Paving $449,769.00 $115,985.00 $565,754.00 William B. Sloan $499,879.00 $72,899.00 $572,778.00 H.E. Sargent $569,000.00 $114,000.00 $683,000.00 Richard L. Crowder $589,000.00 $117,700.00 $706,700.00 May 25,1999 Agen398 ATTACHMENT A PROJECT BUDGET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION BID. CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY 20% PRE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION TOTAL ELIGIBLE INELIGIBLE COMBINED ITEMS ITEMS TOTAL $o $o $o $315,890 $84,980 $400,870 $63,178 $16,996 $80,174 $6,300 $0 $6,300 $51T680 $0 $511680 $437,048 $101,976 $539,024 FUNDING SOURCES VDOT UNMATCHED VDOT MATCH TOTALVDOTFUNDS DEVELOPER MATCH DEVELOPER INELIGIBLE ITEMS TOTAL DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION $300,000 $68T524 $368,524 $68,524 $101~976 $170,500 SURETY DEVELOPER SURETY COUNTY SURETY $437,048 $437,048 APPROPRIATION/TRANSFER FEB 11,1998 FEB 11,1998 FEB 11,1998 FEB 11,1998 MAY 25 1999 TOTAL $450,000 ANTICIPATED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS FOR SURETY $185,000 ANTICIPATED DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION FOR CONSTRUCTION $450,000 ANTICIPATED VDOT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION $5,000 TRANSFER FROM IND. ACCESS ACCT. FOR COUNTY SURETY , $437~048 TRANSFER FROM IND. ACCESS ACCT. FOR COUNTY SURETY $1,527,048 ACBCCHAR 5-18-99 ,P E.OPOSED Dg, tV~ . ' LOCATION MAP NO ASHTON CREEK BUSINESS CENTER CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1___ Meeting Date: Ma/_~ 1999 Subject: Designation of Conservation Easement Item Number: ,_~t__~~_, ~ 3 Coun _ty Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board designate a; conservation easement over a portion of Ironbridge Park, and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary Declaration. Summary_ of Information: Parks and Recreation is prepared to begin construction on 4 baseball and 2 softball fields that were approved in the 1996 Bond Referendum. The Board approved the contract to begin construction at its last meeting. Parks & Recreation has been negotiating with the Corps of Engineers on the terms of a permit approval for the project. The Corps last requirement is that the County establish a conservation easement to preserve the wetlands in Ironbridge Park. The easement will have little impact on the park because after the baseball and softball fields are completed, there will be little more development planned to complete the build out of Ironbridge Park. ,District: Dale J[Dhn W. Harmon Attachments: [Yes NO Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer CHESTERFIELD COUN~IY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 8.D.24. Subject: Resolution Recognizing of Ms. Frances Mann Upon Her Retirement County. Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of the Attached Resolution Summary. of Information: Preparer: (2~,~ ~ Title: Lisa Elko Clerk to the Board Attachments: Yes ~ No Itt RECOGNIZING MS. FRANCES S. MANN UPON HER RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Ms. Frances S. Mann became Deputy Clerk of the Circuit Court in June 1956; and WHEREAS, Ms. Mann served in that capacity until February 1961; and WHEREAS, in February 1961, Ms. Mann became a Legal Secretary in the Commonwealth Attorney's Office; and WHEREAS, she performed those duties until October 1967; and WHEREAS, after a break in service from November 1967 until February 1980, Ms. Mann returned to the Circuit Court; and WHEREAS, on March 1, 1980, Ms. Mann became a Legal Secretary for the Circuit Court Judges; and WHEREAS, Ms. Mann was promoted to Court Administrator in 1984; and WHEREAS, Ms. Mann will retire from public service on June 1, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors commends Ms. Frances S. Mann for her contributions to Chesterfield County's legal system and her outstanding commitment to public service, and wishes her a long, happy and well-earned retirement. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page ~ of ~ Meetin~Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 10.A. Report On: Developer Water and Sewer Contracts Background: The Board of Supervisors has authorized the County Administrator to execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and the Developer where there are no County funds involved. The report is submitted to the Board members as information. Summary of Information: The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County Administrator: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: County Administrator: Attachments: 94-0049 Meadow Creek, Section D at Meadow Oaks Meadow Creek Associates, Inc. A. T. Cart Contractor Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Dale Prepared By: ~ E. Beck~JJr. Yes No $29,000.00 $59,000.00 # 179 Agenda Item May 25, 1999 Page 2 Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 96-0079 Gills Gate William B. DuVal and Gene H. DuVal McClane Construction Company Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Dale 96-0286 Oxbridge Office Park Irvin G. Homer Potts, Minter & Associates Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Dale 97-0272 Court Yard Retirement Center Court Yard and Ironbridge Courtyard Retirement, LLC Herbert A. Phillingane & Sons Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Matoaca 97-0291 Carters Mill, Section 6 J.J.G. Development Coastal Utilities, Inc. Water Improvements - Matoaca $66,519.00 $152,744.00 $13,419.00 (Private) $17,125.00 $96,877.00 $16,744.16 Agenda Item May 25, 1999 Page 3 Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 98-0028 Chesdin Recreation Center Chesdin Company, LLC Stamie E. Lyttle Company Water Improvements - Matoaca $2,200.00 Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 98-0036 Oaklake - Owens The Landsmen Group, LLC Bookman Construction Company Water Improvements - Clover Hill $2,200,00 o Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 98-0055 Amstel Bluff - Section E Amstel Associates J. Steven Chafin, Inc. Water Improvements - Matoaca $39,047.80 Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 98-0056 Food Lion Expansion 6201 Belmont Road Wilton Partners Belmont, LLC Piedmont Construction Company, Inc. (Private) Clover Hill Agenda Item May 25, 1999 Page 4 10. 11. 12. 13. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 98-0115 Food Lion Expansion at Deer Run G. P. Associates, L.P. A. L. Meeks, Inc. Water Improvements - Matoaca 98-0222 National Assisted Living - Salisbury Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. Godsey and Son, Inc. Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian 98-0319 Willesden at Stonehenge Stonehenge/Wood Associates, L.C. R.M.C. Contractors, Inc. Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian 98-0343 Rehrig-James River Industrial Center Skylane Properties, Inc. Piedmont Construction Company, Inc. Water Improvements - Wastewater Improvements Bermuda $12,000.90 $18,990.00 (Private) $26,821.00 $40,456.00 $38,065.50 $2,402.50 Agenda Item May 25, 1999 Page 5 14. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 98-0349 Railey Hill West Sanitary Sewer Extension C. & G. Associates, LLC Bookman Construction Company Wastewater Improvements Midlothian $15,650.00 15. 16. Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: Contract Number: Project Name: Developer: Contractor: Contract Amount: District: 98-0368 Tarmac/Willis Road Tarmac Mid-Atlantic, Inc. fka Tarmac Virginia, Inc. C. D. French Excavating Contractor, Inc. Wastewater Improvements - Bermuda 98-0401 Bon Air Baptist Church Addition 2531 Buford Road Bon Air Baptist Church Trustees Commonwealth Constructors, Inc. Water Improvements Wastewater Improvements - Midlothian (Private) $5,877.50 (Private) CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 10.g,. Su~ect: Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future Capital District Road and Street Light Funds, and Lease Purchases County Administrator's Commen~: Projects, County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information' - El. Ram~e~ ~/' Attachments: Yes ~ No Title: County Administrator BOARD MEETING DATE 07/01/98 10/28/98 10/28/98 10/28/98 10/28/98 11/12/98 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY GENERAL FUND BALANCE May 20, 1999 DESCRIPTION FY99 Actual Beginning Fund Balance Designation of FY98 expenditure savings to address County Unified Pay Plan in future years Reappropriation of FY98 expenditure savings to the Fire Department for use in FY99 Designate net school FY98 expenditure savings for school uses Reappropriation of FY98 County expenditure savings for Unified Pay Plan in FY99 AMOUNT (1,885,893) (141,300) (2,092,918) (7oo,ooo) BALANCE $33,760,968 $31,875,075 $31,733,775 $29,640,857 $28,940,857 Board Meeting Date CHESTERFIELD COUNTY RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT May 20, 1999 Description Amount FOR FISCAL YEAR '99 BEGINNING JULY 1, 1998 4/8/98 FY99 Budgeted Addition 8,150,000 4/8/98 FY99 Capital Projects (5,918,800) 6/24/98 Transfer for Clover Hill Sports Complex, Phase II acceleration of soccer fields, baseball fields, and parking (460,000) 7/29/98 File tracking system in Clerk of Circuit Court's office (50,000) 8/20/98 Designation for potential reduction in grant funds for the Henricus Land purchase (230,000) 10/14/98 Transfer for construction of Phase II of Public Safety Training Center at Enon (To,o0o) 10/28/98 Transfer funds for County match of DCJS grant for Criminal History Record System Improvement to provide video arraignment capabilities. (contingent upon grant approval) (74,977) 11/12/98 Transfer funds to the Chesterfield Historical Society for museum improvements for the County's 250th anniversary (38,000) 11/24/98 Transfer funds to County Capital Projects to fund construction of soccer field lighting at Manchester Middle School (5o, ooo) 11/24/98 Transfer funds to cover costs of security system for Information Systems Technology. (115,oo0) Balance 8,411,790 2,492,990 2,032,990 1,982,990 1,752,990 1,682,990 1,608,013 1,570,013 1,520,013 1,405,013 Board Meeting Date 12/16/98 1/27/99 2/10/99 2/24/99 2/24/99 3/24/99 3/24/99 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY P~SERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PRO~e, CTS TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT May 20, 1999 Description Designation for FY2000 road projects local match: Walton Park Sidewalk Point of Rocks Road Bike Trail, Phase I Centre Street Streetlight Cogbill Road Sidewalk Salem Church Road Sidewalk Designation for potential expenses related to the Year 2000 project Transfer funds to bury overhead utility lines along Jury Drive Transfer for Circuit/General District Courthouse space needs assessment Transfer for requirements analysis for the financial and human resources/payroll system Transfer for design/engineering of baseball/ softball fields to be constructed at Goyne Park. Transfer for re-construction of boardwalk at Point of Rocks Park. Amount (52,800) (48,000) (8,ooo) (26,000) (15,2oo) (15o,ooo) (lOO,OOO) (75,000) (15o,ooo) (5o, ooo) (80,000) Balance 1,255,013 1,105,013 1,005,013 930,013 780,013 730,013 650,013 4/14/99 Transfer to the Public Safety Training Center Project in Enon for bid award for range floor (65,000) 585,013 Prepared by Aeco~tm~ Depar~em April 30, 1999 Date Began 12/88 Description SCHEDULE OF CAP/TALIZED LEASE PURCHASES APPROVED ANI}EXECUTED Airport State Police Hangar Additions County Warehouse Total '12/93 Rea/Prop~qy Lea~ Purohase 09/96 04/99 Sohool Technioal Center Printing Press Public Facility Lease Juvenile Courts Project Original Amount $128,800 331,200 460,000 17,510,000 8O,649 16,100,000 Date Ends 12/00 12/01 11/99 11/19 Outstanding Balance 04/30/99 $22,524 57,9t8 80,442 6,990,000 11,805 16,100,000 TOTAL APPROVED AND EXECUTED $34,150,649 $23,182,247 PENI)ING EXECUTION None *Second Refunding of Certifioates of Participation, Series 1985 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page I of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: iO.C. Subject: Roads Accepted into the State County Administrator's Comments: Secondary System County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information' Preparer: Lisa H. Elko Attachments: Ycs -~No Title: Clerk to the Board i90 c:::; o c::; o ~ c:; 0 0 0 ~°~°°~ 0 0 0 0 0 f'q 0 O~ ~' 0 o c:; ~ ~ c::; CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 2 Meetin~ Date: Mai 25, 1999 Item Number: 16.A. Subject: A Public Hearing to Consider the Restriction of Through Truck Traffic on Beulah Road County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: A public hearing is scheduled for May 25, 1999, to consider the restriction of through truck traffic on Beulah Road between Kingsland Road and Salem Church Road, and between Salem Church Road and Hopkins Road. Summary of Information: Staffhas received a request to restrict any through truck or truck and trailer or semi-trailer combination, except pickup or panel trucks, from using Beulah Road (Route 641) between Kingsland Road (Route 611) and Salem, Church Road (642), and between Salem Church Road (642) and Hopkins Road (637). The recommended alternate route is Kingsland Road (Route 611), Route 10, Chippenham Parkway (Route 150), and Hopkins Road (Route 637). The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has five (5) criteria it considers when a restriction is requested. Based on staff's preliminary review, this request will satisfy two (2) of VDOT's five (5) criteria for imposing a restriction, in that: 1) the engineering of the roadway indicates that it is not suitable for truck traffic, and 2) there is a reasonable alternate route. This request will not meet the remaining three (3) criteria in that: 1) the route is not classified as a local or collector road, 2) the volume of through trucks does not exceed VDOT's 200 per day minimum volume, and 3) there are not 12 dwellings per 1000 feet of roadway along Beulah Road. A request that satisfies at least three (3) of VDOT's five (5) criteria will generally qualify for a restriction. Preparer: ¢' Q~. ~J[ *' ~J~,~_~ Title: R.I McCracken ~ Agen395 Attachments: Yes ~ No Director of Transportation 193 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Summary. of Information: (Continued) Recommendation: If the Board wishes to pursue this request, the attached resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to restrict through truck traffic on Beulah Road should be adopted. District: Dale WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors received a request to restrict any through truck or truck and trailer or semi-trailer combination except pickup or panel trucks from using Beulah Road (Route 641 ) between Kingsland Road (Route 611) and Salem Church Road (Route 642), and between Salem Church Road (Route 642) and Hopkins Road (Route 637); and, WHEREAS, the recommended alternate route is Kingsland Road, Route 10, Chippenham Parkway, and Hopkins Road; and, WHEREAS, the Board has conducted a public hearing on the restriction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to restrict through truck traffic on Beulah Road. May 25, 1999 agcn395 RESTRICTION C THROUGH. TRUCK TRAFFIC O1,. c~EUI_AH ROAD ,, PROPOSED RESTRICT'FD ROUTE -- '- '- -' PROPOSFD AL~TE ROUTE P. O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media Genera Richmon(~, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFIELD CO.BO.SUPV ATTN LISA ELKO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P 0 BOX 40 CHESTERFIELD VA 23832 220806 05/18/99 Ad: Size 05/18/99 121 TAKE NOTICE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE BOARD O 1 X 31 142.91 Richmond Newspapers. Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TiMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS vvas published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc,, in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 05/18/99 The first insertion being given Sworn to and subscribed before me this Notary Public ~a~e ot v~glma City of RiChmOnd MY Commission expires 03/31/01 05/18/99 Su THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1 AGENDA Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 16.B. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Ordinance Providing for Assessment of Partially Completed Buildings County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Adoption of Ordinance Providing for Assessment of' Partially Completed Buildings. Summary_ of Information: State law permits the County to reassess buildings at the end of the year if they are under construction as of January 1 st of the real estate tax year, but are completed by November 1 of the tax year. The Board adopted a resolution in 1955 authorizing this approach of assessing buildings under construction. In such cases, the County has extended the deadline for payment of taxes based on such reassessments from December 5th to February 5th. The Assessor's Office has requested that the assessment process be codified in order to better inform the property owners in the County of the assessment process. The ordinance will have no impact on existing real estate or have any financial impact on the County. Staff recommends adopting the ordinance. Steven L. Micas Attachments: · Yes [] No County Attorney 0614:44817.1 I# AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY ADDING SECTION 9-14.1 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT OF NEW BUILDINGS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 9-14.1 of the Code o_f the Coun~ o_f Chester_field, 1997, as amended, is added to read as follows: Sec. 9-14.1. Assessment of new buildings substantially completed. In accordance with Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3 292, all new buildings substantially completed or fit for use and occupancy prior to November 1 of the year of completion shall be assessed by the assessor when such building is so completed or fit for use and occupancy. No partial assessment as provided herein shall become effective until information as to the date and amount of such assessment is recorded in the office of the treasurer and made available for public inspection. The taxes on any such new building for that year shall be the sum of(i) the tax upon the assessment of the completed building computed according to the ratio which the portion of the year such building is substantially completed or fit for use and occupancy bears to the entire year, and (ii) the taxes upon the assessment of such new building as it existed on January 1 of that assessment year, computed according to the ratio which the portion of the year such building was not substantially competed or fit for use and occupancy bears to the entire year. With respect to any assessment made under this section after September 1 of any year, the penalty for nonpayment by December 5 provided in Section 9-16 shall be extended to February 5 of the succeeding year. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 0600:44298.1 P. O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bil~, p~ease pay from invoice} CHESTERFI ELD CO. BO. SUPV ATTN LISA SLKO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 0 BOX 4 0 CHESTERFIELD VA 23832 220806 05/18/99 o5/18/99 TAKE NOTICE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE BOARD O 1 x 27 Richmond Newspapers, inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TiMES-DISPATCH This is to Cert fy that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was pub ished by RiChmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond; State of Virginia, on the following dates: 05/11/99 05/18/99 The first insertion being given .... 05/11/99 Sworn to and subscribed before me this b ~ ~(:~,,~' ~ ci ~:~L~h~mi ~nad Notary Public My Commission expires 03/3 ~/01 Supervisor THiS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE, THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page __ 1 ofl Meeting Date: May' 25, 3.999 Item Number: 16. ¢. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Exercise of Eminent Domain for the Acquisition of Right of Way and Easements for Ashton Creek Business Center and Authorization to Enter and Take Such Property Prior to Eminent Domain Proceedings County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the exercise of eminent domain for the acquisition of right of way and easements for Ashton Creek Business Center and authorization to enter and take such property prior to eminent domain proceedings. Summary_ of Information: On February 24, 1999, the Board of Supervisors authorized the Right of Way staff to assist Goodrich River Trust in the acquisition of right of way and easements for Ashton Creek Business Center. On April 15, 1999, an offer of $74,950.00 was made by the Right of Way Office to Roslyn Farm Corporation, a Virginia Corporation, for the purchase of 1.506 acres of right of way, a 16' sewer easement and two 10' temporary construction easements needed for road improvements to Ruffin Mill Road and extension of public sewer to Ashton Creek Business Center. The County has been unable to reach an agreement with Roslyn Farm Corporation for the necessary right of way and easements. It is necessary to enter upon and take such property for a public purpose prior to the determination of just compensation in eminent domain proceedings. Authorization at a public hearing will allow the County to take immediate title to the property and will obligate the County to purchase the property sought. Staff will continue to negotiate with Roslyn Farm Corporation in an effort to reach a settlement. Approval is recommended. Districts: Bermuda Preparer:~~ -z~J. ~ John W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manager ;~00 OLIVER D. RUBY, TRUSTEE DEED BOOK 2800, PG. 865 OPN# 812639179200000 #1211 RUFFIN MILL ROAD 15' ROSLYN FARM CORPORATION DEED BOOK 1252, PG. 358 GPN# 809656966900000 #17ft PUFFIN MILL ROAD 70' N 5637595.81 ~45' E 11810972.76 ~ R=2829.79' 2,548.08' TO THE ~- N89'29'3.~"E EAST LINE OF RUFFIN ,564.03 MILL RD. STATE TRE. 74-6 TOTAL PORT. WALTHALL 70' R/W GRAPHIC SCALE YUKON ASSOCIATES DEED BOOK 2163, PG. 1.54-4- :~ GPN# 811657697800000 //94-0 PORT WALTHALL DRIVE I0' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 8.81' C/L ESMT. TO P/L 249.03' ~1 R='~ 467.40" DRIVE I Inch = 200 tt PLAT SHB~ING A 16' SANITARY SEWER AND TWO 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS ACROSS THE PROPERTY DF RBSLYN FARM CORPORATION BERMUDA DISTRICT CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, SCALE , 1' = 200' APRIL t, 1999 REVISED, APRIL G, 1999 CHARLES C. TO~/NES 8, ASSOCIATES, P.C. CIVIL ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - LAND SURVEYORS 9850 LORI ROAD, SUITE 201 CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 748-9011 ATTN, I]RA~/N BY GltB/PAH FD L APPROVED BY P. O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT Account Num 220686 05/18/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Date Code Description AdSize Total Cost 05/18/99 121 TAKE NOTICE THAT ON MAY 25, 1999, AT 7:0 1 x 22 101.42 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH TAKE NOTICE That on May 25, 1999, al 7:001 D,m, o[ 8s seer f:hereafter as may be heard, the Board of SupervPI sots aC Chestedield County at its regular meetin~ place in the Board I Room of Chesterfield County, Vir-I gmia, will consider the exercise ofI eminent domain for the acquisi-I ben of right oi way and easements 1 for Ashton Creek Business Center, eminent domain proceedings, Right of Way Manager m Chester- field County, Virginia,and may be De(ween th~ hours el 8:30 a.rr Friday This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers. Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 05/18/99 The first insertion being given .... Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~.~ -:~%7_--:~ }~ ~ . ~.¢. Notary Public State'~ of V~rg~ma City of Richmond My Commission expires 03/31/0 t 05/18/99 Supervisor; THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: ]_6.D. Subject: Public Hearing to Consider the Conveyance of Lease of Real Property at Woodlake Athletic Complex for Operation of Food Concessions by Midlothian Youth Soccer League County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve the conveyance of .lease of real property for operation of food concessions at Woodlake Athletic Complex. Summary. of Information: In the past, the concession facilities have been operated by cosponsored athletic associations or leagues that use the adjoining ballfields. Midlothian Youth Soccer League has expressed an interest to lease the concession facility at Woodlake Athletic Complex. Midlothian Youth Soccer League is the primary user of this facility and would benefit from this lease agareement. The terms of the new lease will be June 1, 1999 - December 31, 2000. The public hearing and approval of the Board is necessary to execute the lease agreement. Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this request. Preparer: ~0(~~~~ Title: Micl~ael S. Go"o~en Director, Parks and Recreation Attachments: Yes ~ No ',203 LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this __ day of , 199__, by and between the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ("Lessor") and ("Lessee"). WHEREAS, the Lessor owns and operates a recreational park in Chesterfield County, Virginia, known as , located in District, in which there has been constructed a concession facility, and WHEREAS, Lessee desires to operate the concession facility to offer food, beverages and other products to the general public using such facility. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, Lessor hereby grants and the Lessee hereby accepts a nonexclusive lease to operate the concession facility located at upon the following terms and conditions: 1. The lease herein granted shall be effective for a period of three (3) years, commencing on January 1, __ and ending December 31, __ unless terminated sooner by Lessor due to any default by the Lessee which is not cured within thirty days after Lessee receives written notice of such default. 2. Lessee shall pay to Lessor a sum equal to twelve percent (12%) of the gross receipts from all concession sales, including credit sales, and said payment shall be made payable to the Treasurer of the County of Chesterfield and delivered to the Director of Parks and Recreation, County of Chesterfield, Virginia, ("Director"), on December 31 of the current year. In the event that Lessee makes such payments on or before December 31 of the current year, Lessee shall receive a 0607:21140.1 - 1- ; 04 the operation of the concession facility. h. To secure and keep in force adequate fire and hazard insurance upon the contents, and public liability insurance naming the County as co-insured in an amount not less than $500,000, and to provide the Director with a Certificate of Insurance which indicates that County is so named and so insured. i. To indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from any and all claims, suits, damages, costs and expenses arising out of or in any way relating to Lessee's conduct and operation of the concession facility, and from any damages, claims or suits based on personal injury or property damage caused by Lessee's negligence. j. To keep the area in and around the immediate vicinity of the concession building free of litter and debris. k. To file for the Director's approval, a schedule of items to be sold for human consumption and the prices to be charged, prior to the commencement of operation. Upon approval, neither the items to be sold nor the prices shall be altered, amended or modified without prior approval of the Director. I. To immediately report any theft of merchandise, personal property, cash, checks or credit slips to the police and the Director. m. To assist in the conservation of energy by shutting down all major equipment during the off season. 4. Lessor and Lessee mutually covenant and agree that: a. Lessee has inspected the concession facility and agrees to accept same in its condition as of the date of this contract. Lessee shall not make any alterations or additions to 0607:21140.1 -3- the leased premises without the prior written consent of Lessor. All alterations, changes and improvements built, constructed or placed on the leased premises by Lessee, with the exception of fixtures removable without damage to the premises and movable personal property shall, unless otherwise provided by written agreement between Lessor and Lessee, become the property of the Lessor and remain on the demised premises at the expiration or sooner termination of the Lease. Lessee agrees that the cost of any replacement keys and changing of locks afl:er Lessor's initial provision of same will be borne by Lessee. b. Lessor shall not be liable for damage to any property or injury to any person in, on or about the concession facility from any cause whatsoever. c. Lessor shall have access to concession facility at all times, and shall have first priority for use of said facility in the event of a scheduling conflict between Lessee and Lessor. Lessor shall give Lessee at least 30 days' notice of Lessor's intent to use said facility. d. Lessor shall provide, without additional cost to Lessee, electricity, water and sewer facilities, and regular trash collection. e. Lessee shall not assign this Lease nor sublease the Leased Premises without the prior written consent of Lessor, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Any attempted sublease or assignment without the consent of the Lessor shall be void and of no force or effect. f. All items of indebtedness or damage under these covenants shall be considered as items of rent and Lessor shall have the same liens and the same remedies for the collection thereof as are provided herein and by law for the collection of rent. g. Upon the breach of any covenant contained herein or the abandonment or vacation of the premises by the Lessee, or the failure to provide the required Certificate of 0607:2114.0.1 Insurance, books, records, financial reports or payments, the Lessor may, at its option, immediately terminate this Lease, and shall have the right to enter the premises at once and take possession thereof, including improvements erected thereon. Such termination or possession, however, shall not deprive the Lessor of any other action or remedy for possession, rent or damages. h. In the event the demised premises are condemned, in whole or in part, or otherwise acquired by a public authority, this Lease, at the optiOn of the Lessee, may thereupon be terminated and the Lessor shall not be liable for any inconvenience or damage to the Lessee cased thereby. The Lessor reserves the right to condemn as provided by law and such action by the Lessor shall constitute a means for termination of this Lease without penalty. 5. Lessor and Lessee agree that this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement, understanding and representation, express or implied, between the parties. This Agreement supersedes all prior written or oral agreements or proposals between the parties. 6. This Agreement shall be governed by the terms herein. Any dispute concerning this Agreement shall be resolved in the Circuit Court of the County of Chesterfield. This Agreement is deemed to have been made in Virginia and shall be construed under the laws of Virginia. 7. This contract is expressly contingent upon the approval of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, which approves this contract and authorizes its execution by the County Administrator. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: 0607:21140.1 -5- LESSOR: COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA By: Lane B. Ramsey County Administrator Approved as to form: Michael S. J. Chemau Assistant County Attorney LESSEE: By: Title: ATTEST: 0607:21140.1 ;..'09 An Affiliate of Media General P, O BOX 85333 Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, Cease pay from invoice) CHESTERFIELD CO. BO, SUPV ATTN LISA ELKO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P © BOX ~0 VA 23832 220806 05/18/99 05/I8/99 121 TAKE NOTICE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE BOARD O 1 x 22 202;84 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TiMES-DiSPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EvENTs of Richmondi State of Virginia, On the following dates: 05/11/99 05/18/99 The first insertion being given Sworn to and subscribed before me this :~ ~ ;~(:>-"~'/'i State ia Notary Public City of Richmond 03/ I My Commission expires ~ /01 05/11/99 SM THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 16.E. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate Portions of Lots 30, 31, 43 and 45 Within Chesdin Landing, Section 4 County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator:~ Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance to vacate portions of Lots 30, 31, 43 and 45 within Chesdin Landing Subdivision, Section 4, shown on the attached plat. Summary_ of Information: Chesdin Company, L.L.C. has submitted an application requesting the vacation of portions of Lots 30, 31, 43 and 45 within Chesdin Landing Subdivision, Section 4. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Matoaca Harmon Attachments: Yes Title: Riqht of Way Manager VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE TO VACATE PORTIONS OF LOTS 30, 31, 43 AND 45 WITHIN CHESDIN LANDING, SECTION 4 CCHESDIN COMPANY LLC NO. DELTA/BRNG 68'24'28"W 89'08'25"W 69'2TSO"E 0'59'07" 75'17'29"E 58'1T22"W 44',35'15"E 78'00'57"E 00'51'36"E 23'39'16"W RADIUS LEN/DIST TANGENT ,320.03 155.44 54.30 1150.10 19.4,3 28.65 19.07 1080.1 22.10 .380.76 261.78 26.65 13.28 44 \ EXISTING 15' ~ EASEMENT P.B. 100, PGS. 5-11 9.72 11.05 EXISTING 15' EASEMENT P.B. 100, PGS. 5-11 30 31 43 45 46 CHEDIN LANDING.. SECTION 4 P.B. 100, PGS. 5-11 29 CHEDIN LANDINg.-, SECTION 4 P.B. I00, PGS, 5-11 PLAT SHOWING A PORTION OF LOTS 50, 51, 4-5 AND 4-5 OF CHESDIN LANDING - SECTION 4- TO BE VACATED MATOACA DISTRICT * CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1 O0 2 O0 Koontz. Bryant, P.C. ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS 1100 WELBORNE DRIVE RICHMOND, VlRGINI^ 23229 (804) 740-9200 FAX (804) 740-7358 DATE: APRIL 5, 1999 SCALE: 1" = 100' CHKD BY: E,A,{~ DRAWN BY: SPE JOB NO: 99434 99434RPS.DWG P. Q Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT iAocoun~ ~ 220686 05/18/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Date: Code Description 05/18/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MAY 25, 1999, AT 7: 1 x 28 258,Z6 TAKE NOTICE: That on May 25, 1999, at 7:00 p,m. or as shoe thereafter as may be heard, ~le Board of Supervi* sots of Chesterfield CountY' at its regular meeting place in the Board Room of Cbesterfiefd County, vir- ginia, will consider the following ordihance 'for adoption: AN ORDINANCE to vacae portions of Lots 30, 3t, 43 and 45 within Chesdin Landing Subdivi- sion, Section 4; as shown on a pint by Koontz~Bwant, P,C. dated August 21; 1998, recorded August 27, 1998, in the Clerk's Office, Cir- cuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Deed Book 100, at Pages 5 through 11, The complete text of the prboesed ordinance and conveyance is on tile in the office of the Rioht of Wa;, Manager in Chesterfield County, Virginia, Md may be examined bv all interested parties between ttt~ hours 0t 8:30 a,m end 5:00 p,rn, Monday through Friday~ Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers, thC., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 05/11/99 05/18/99 The first insertion being given .... Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~. _,~:~ _,c-~('_~ State" of-Virtnia Notary Public City of Richmond My Commismon expires 03/31/0 i 05/11/99 Superwsorj THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 16.F. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a 16' Drainage Easement across Lot 49, Riverton Subdivision, Section B County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of a 16' drainage easement across Lot 49, Riverton Subdivision, Section B, shown on the attached plat. Summary_ of Information: James and Julie Harper have submitted an application requesting the vacation of a portion of a 16' drainage easement across Lot 49, Riverton Subdivision, Section B. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Midlothian Preparer:~ 7..J. (2~:~.-~0-~ John W. Harmon Attachments: YesI INo Title: Riqht of Way Manager VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 16' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 49, RIVERTON SUBDIVISION, SECTION B JAMES & JULIE HARPER ? /f 11ie Weaver 'WESF RIVE:It OAKS TH.rS ?F~OPERr¥ [$ LOCATEg [~ F,E.~,4, FLO00 ZONE WArraNTY [5 HERE~Y 6~YEN OR IMPLIEO 45 [0 THE EX]ETE~E OE NON-EXIStEnCE ~rORA~E T~NKE, CEH~AIE~ OR ~UBZAL 5~r6~ 5HRI~/S~ELL SOIL$ Nrc oPERrY REFERENCE:. NIT E~GLE CONS~R~rlON oF VIRGINIA. INC EASE~4EN~ . ' / 4P 30,25d ,5-0 sQ, ~8 / / AREA TO BE VACATED C O~.fPL ~ ?E ~OO ~ (F) E' VDOT / S~REE~LIGHr SLOPE / WALK F' O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media Genera Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT _%.COUnt Num [ 220686 ~_ Date 'i___~ 05/18/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Date Code Description Ad Size Total Cost 05/18/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MAY 25, 1999, AT 7: 1 x 29 267.38 TAKE NOTICE: That on May 25 1999, at 7:00 ,m, or as soon thereafter as may e heard, the Board of Sucaryl- sore of Chesterfield County :at its regular meeting place in the Board Roam of Chesteffie d County V r- ginia, will cons der the following ordinance for adoption; AN ORDINANCE to vacate a por- tion of a 16' drainage easemen within Riverton Subdivison, Sec- t on B, Lot 49; as Showd on ~ olat by Belzer . & Associates, Inc,, dated December 6, 1995, recorded December 20 1995 in the Clerk's Office, C rcuit Court Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Deed Book 89, at Pages 63, 64 cad The complete text of the proposed ordinance and corweyance is on fi~e ie the office of the Right 0f Way Manager in Chesterfield County, Virqini~ end mat, be examined by~all interested p~rties between the hours of 8:30 a,m. end 5:00 p,m, Monday through Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING DVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 05/11/g9 05/18/99 The first insertion being given .... 05/tl/99 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~-- ~O--E~ ~ State ~f 'Vi~a Notary Public City of Richmond My Commission expires 03/31/01 THIS I$ NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 16.G. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a 40' Right of Way Known as Gill Street Within the Town of Chester County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance to vacate a portion of a 40' right of way known as Gill Street within the Town of Chester, shown on the attached plat. Summary_ of Information: Lynwood E. Fields, Jr. and Laurie G. Fields have submitted an application requesting the vacation of a portion of a 40' right of way known as Gill Street within the Town of Chester. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda ~ohn W. Harmon Attachments: Yes ~-~No Title: Riqht of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 40' RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS GILL STREET WITHIN THE TOWN OF CHESTER LYNWOOD E. FIELDS, JR. AND LAURIE G. FIELDS :ion Chester Af~E CHESTEF STA ;.'_.17 x~ P. O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT Account Num] 220686; 05/z8/99 CHESTERFI ELD, VA. 23832 Date COde Description Ad Size Total Cost 05/18/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MAY 25, 1999, AT 7: 1 X 26 2 39,72 t 7 o01 NOTICE: That on Ma;, 25, 1999. a : p.m, or as sgon thereafter as ma}' be heard, the Board et Superw- so s of Chesterfield County at its reguiar meeting place in the Beard Boom of Chest,erfidd County, Vir- o nia wili consider the ¢ottowing ~rdinance or adopt, or~ AN ORDINANCE to vacate a por- tion of a 40! Right of Way known as Gild Street Withid Town of Ches- ter Subdivision, as shown on e plat dated April 27, 1878, in the Clerk's Office, Circui Court, Ches- terfield County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1, at Page 311, oT~e complete text of the proposed dinance and conveyance is on file in the office of the Right of Way Manager in Chestede d County, Virginia and may be examinied by al~ interested parties between the hours 0f 8:30 a,m. and 5:00 p m, Modday through Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond; State of Virginia, on the following dates: 05/11/99 05/18/99 The first insertion being given .... Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~-~ - '-Z C ~ Stat~ of V~inia Notary Public City of Richmond My Commission expires 03/31/01 05/11/99 ,\ SupervisOr' ~ THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THA~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 16.H. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Exchange of Parcels of Land at the Proposed Watermill Development County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the exchange of parcels of land at the proposed Watermill Development and authorize the Chairman of the Board and County Administrator to sign the necessary deed. Summary_ of Information: Staff requests the Board of Supervisors approve the conveyance of parcel 1, containing 0.334 acres, and parcel 3, containing 0.357 acres (0.691 acres) in exchange for parcel 2, containing 0.156 acres, and parcel 4, containing 0.535 acres (0.691 acres) at proposed Watermill as shown on the attached plat. This exchange will allow for the realignment of the access road that will serve the County's school/park site and improve development plans and road design. Staff recommends approval. District: Matoaca Preparer: ~~ -~.f, ~,~ John W. Harmon Attacb_ments: YesI INo Title: Right of Way Manaqer VICINITY SKETCtLI PUBLIC HEARING: EXCHANGE OF PARCELS OF LAND AT THE PROPOSED WATERMILL DEVELOPMENT iPARKWAY (PROPOS F, E G A'.rTA'--, 1 ./ P. O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Medi~ Genera~ Richmond. Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT 220686 05/18/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Late Code Description Ad Size Total Cost_~-~_ 05/18/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MAY 25, 1999, AT 7: 1 x 21 96.81 TAKE NOTIC~E: - That on May 25, 1999, at ?:O01 p.m, or ~S aoon thereafter as may l be heard, the Board ef Supe~v~-t sots of Chesterfield Coun y at ts l regular m~ting ¢~ce in the Board Room of Chesterfield C0U~ ginia, wil~ Consider the exchange~ of parcels Of land ~ the proposed W~termill Deve~opmect 1o~ted MATOACA Dis~r~ct Cl]esterfiedl County; Virginia A more particular d~cription the parcels to be exchanged and further information is on file office of the Righ~ of Way Man,a- er m Chestedie]d County; ~i and may be examined dy all mter-~ esmd Carries between [he hours~ of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 pm. Mon-j Richmond Newspapers. Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 05/18/99 The first insertion being given Sworn to and subscribed before me this, .- -¢ ,- -~..;~ -~ ~i St '~ ¢'-L ~J . . Notary Public City of RiChmOnd MY COmmiSsion expires 03/31/01 05/18/99 CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 16.I. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Leasing of County Property at the Bellwood Water Tank County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: BoardActionRequested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the leasing of County property at the Bellwood water tank to Triton PCS Company L.L.C. Summary_ of Information: On November 12, 1999 the Board of Supervisors authorized Triton PCS to apply for necessary approvals to install communications equipment on County Property at the Bellwood water tank. All approvals have been obtained. The lease term is for five years with three 5 year renewal terms. Approval is recommended. Districts: Bermuda John W. Harmon Attach. merits: I Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manager P. O~ Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649~6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, Please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT 220686 05/i8/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Date; 05/18/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MAY 25, 1999, AT 7: 1 x 18 rTAKE NOTICE: That on May 25, 1999; at 7:00 . or as soon thereafter sore Of Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by RiChmond NeWspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on tkle following dates: 05/18/99 8:30 a,m. 5:00 D.m,, Monday mrougn The first insertion being given .... 05/18/99 THIS IS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~~ o,~,~ _c~Q , \£'; ~ r, ' .... ~' \ N , , , ¢. otary Public ~~ia Notary Publ City of Richmond My Commission expires 03/31/01 NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 16.3. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider the Leasing of County Property at the Clover Hill Water Tank County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors approve the leasing of County property at the Clover Hill water tank to Triton PCS Company L.L.C. Summary_ of Information: On November 12, 1999 the Board of Supervisors authorized Triton PCS to apply for necessary approvals to install communications equipment on County Property at the Clover Hill water tank. All approvals have been obtained. The lease term is for five years with three 5 year renewal terms. Approval is recommended. Districts: Clover Hill John W. Harmon Attachments: I Yes No Title: Right of Way Manaqer P. O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill. please pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT 220686 05/18,/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Description Ad Size Total 7Cost-j 05/18/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MAY 25, 1999, AT 7: 1 × 19 87.59 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH Tha~ on May 25. 1999 at 7;00 ~soe, m, or as soon thereafter as may heard, the Board of Supervl~ rs of Chesterfield County at ts regular meeting place in th~ Board Room of Chesterf ed County, V qinia, wil~ ~nsider the leamfio of ~ou~ty property water ta~k 13810 Hull Street~ Road. ' The complete text of t~ p~op~ed lease is of~ lite n the o rice of the R~ght o~ W~y Mana~r n Ches[~r- field Coumy, Virgin ~, and may be examined by all}nteres ed part esi between ~he hours and 5:00 p.m,, Monday through HERE This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers, Inc., in the City of Richmond, State of Virginia, on the following dates: 05/18/99 The first insertion being given .... 05/18/99 Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~-~ ~?o--~ t \ f , --.> Public Stat~ of Virginia Cityof Richmond My Commission expires 03/31/0 ~ Supervisd.r,.~} CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 16.K. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance to Vacate Portions of Home Acres Subdivision County_ Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt an ordinance to vacate portions of Home Acres Subdivision, as shown on the attached map. Summary of Information: James F. Hayes and M. Diana Hayes have submitted an application requesting the vacation of Lots 1 and 4, Block 11; two 15' alleys; and, a 60' unimproved right of way known as Princeton Avenue within Home Acres Subdivision. This request has been reviewed by staff and approval is recommended. District: Bermuda ~ohn W. Harmon Attachments: Yes No Title: Riqht of Way Manager VICINITY SKETCH PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE TO VACATE PORTIONS OF HOME ACRES SUBDIVISION JAMES F. HAYES AND M. DIANA HAYES ND PK leasant Rapt ~n Co § PRESTWOUL[ FARMS ELD 0 NIANOR 'OORW;LL 1 7787 25OO 'I7'/'/'T~ AREAS TO BE VACATED ? PORTION OF HOMES ACRES TO BE VACATED 906 NE C=~d~ta 115275~2o5 3648550 SW C=~t~ ? 1827027. ~ 3548050 9:.Z~%oOX-.-,x HOtXEA£RES MAP OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY VIRGINA Apr 28 1999 I ~= lO0. OOfeet P. O. Box 85333 An Affiliate of Media General Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (Thisisnot abill; pleaSe pay from invoice) CHESTERFILD CO RIGHT WAY RIGHT OF WAY DEPT [~._ccount Num.] 22 0686 05/18/99 CHESTERFIELD, VA. 23832 Date Code Ad Size To~al Cost 05/18/99 121 TAKE NOTICE: THAT ON MAY 25r 1999r AT 7: 1 x 30 276;60 TAKE NOTICE That on Way 26, 19B9. al 7:00 be heard, /:he Board of Supervill sots of Ohos erfield County at l s~ regular meeting place in the Board R5om of Chestedleld County. Vir- ordinance for adoption: AN ORDINANCE to vacate a por- tion o~ Home Acres, two ~5' alleys and a 60' unimproved right of way Home Acres Subdivision, as shown on a pin~. bv CHAS. B, JOHNSON. dated NOVEMBER 7, 1927 and /evised NOVEMBER 27 Court, Chesterfield County Virg n- o n Deed Book 4, at Pages and 97. · e in the office ct me Rieht afl Way blanaqer in Chesterfield Co'my, Vir~lnla, and may be examined by all interested parties Richmond Newspapers, thc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMING EVENTS was published by Richmond Newspapers Inc., in the City of Richmond. State of Virginia, on the following dates: 05/11/99 05/18/99 The first insertion being given .... Sworn to and subscribed before me this '~ :; State ~: Vff'gmia Notary Public City of Richmond My Commiss,on expires 03/31/01 05/11/99 Superwsor THIS IS NOT A BILL PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. Meetin.q Date: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA May 25~ 1999 Item Number: 16 .L. Page 1 of 2 Subiect: Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Amendment relating to Business License Fees County Administrator's Comments: County Administrator: Board Action Requested. Hold a Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Amendment relating to Business License Fees Summary of Information: At the April 28 meeting, the Board was requested to set a public hearing to consider an option to limit BPOL revenue to the FY99 projected level. The option presented would reduce rates in certain license categories. During the meeting, a second option was presented allowing for a $40,000 exemption of gross receipts of a business with gross receipts of $100,000 or more, from the gross receipts tax. After reviewing the two options, the Board set this public hearing to accept comments on the options. The options are summarized below. Rate Reduction Option The rate reduction option would reduce January 2000 rates in four of the license categories. The January 2000 rates would be reduced by 10% in the Personal and Business Services and Commission Merchant categories (from $.36 to $.32) and in the Professional Services category (from $.58 to $.52). These changes are expected to result in Preparer: 4 ~ Ti tle: Rebecca T. Dickson Director, Budget & Management Attachments: Yes CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: Summary of Information (cont.): a reduction to the estimated BPOL revenue which, when coupled with expected growth in the various classification categories, is projected to yield about the same BPOL revenue in FY2000 as is expected in FY99. Reductions in these categories would impact approximately 2,000 businesses (or licenses) and would begin to move the County's rates closer to Henrico's. Under this option, rate reductions are not proposed in the contractor, retail and wholesale merchant categories. Currently, these rates are similar to Henrico's and are lower than the County's other rates. Exemption Option The exemption option would exempt $40,000 of gross receipts of a business with gross receipts of $100,000 or more, from the gross receipts tax, beginning January 2000. This exemption would apply to all businesses in all categories currently paying a BPOL tax. In the case of a business with multiple licenses, that business would receive a single exemption of $40,000 applied first to the category with the highest tax rate. As with the rate reduction option, this exemption would result in a reduction to the estimated BPOL revenue which, when coupled with expected growth in the various classification categories, is projected to yield about the same BPOL revenue in FY2000 as is expected in FY99. This option is estimated to impact a maximum of about 5500 businesses. Neither option would impact the payment made by businesses with gross receipts less that $100,000. Effective January 2000, these businesses would pay a maximum flat fee of $50, a reduction from the current maximum of $100. Both options are expected to result in approximately $571,000 less in BPOL revenue in FY2000 than was originally projected. The FY2000 budget was established to accommodate the adoption of one of these options. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTIONS 6-23, 6-27, 6-28, 6-29, 6-30 AND 6-32 RELATING TO BUSINESS LICENSE TAXATION BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1)That Sections 6-23, 6-27, 6-28, 6-29, 6-30, 6-32 of the Code o_f the CounO; o_f Chester_field, 199 7, as amended, are amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 6-23. Imposition of taxes generally. Z"3dlytgi I[VICU LI. IILIliGl [,1113 O.1LI~,IIG 311~1,11 L/U 111 6ULIILIUII L~J ~,lly IUU chapter. No tax shall be levied pursuant to this article on any business whose base year gross receipts,or gross purchases in the case of wholesale merchants, were less than $100,000.00. OOO Sec. 6-27. Financial services. Every person engaged in a financial service shall pay a license tax of $0.5§ $0.52 per $100.00 of base year gross receipts. Sec. 6-28. Real estate services. Every person engaged in a real estate service shall pay a license tax of $0.5§ $0.52 per $100.00 of base year gross receipts. Sec. 6-29. Professional services. Every person engaged in a professional service shall pay a license tax of $0.5 § $0.52 per $100.00 of base year gross receipts. Sec. 6-30. Pe?~;,-, ?~rsonal, and business services. Every person engaged in a repair, personal, or business service shall pay a license tax of $0.36 $0.32 per $100.00 of base year gross receipts. 000 Sec. 6-32. Commission merchants. Every person engaged in business as a commission merchant shall pay a license tax of $0.36 $0.32 per $100.00 of base year gross receipts. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective on January 1, 2000. 0421:44713.1 ;3,30 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED BY AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 6-23 RELATING TO BUSINESS LICENSE TAXATION BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: (1) That Section 6-23 of the Code o_f the Count~ of Chesterfield, 1997, as amended, is amended and re-enacted to read as follows: Sec. 6-23. Imposition of taxes generally. ~ No tax shall be levied pursuant to this article on any business whose base year gross receipts, or gross purchases in the case of wholesale merchants, were less than $100,000.00. I__f the base year gross receipts of all activities of the business are greater than or equal to $100,000.00, the amount of such gross receipts shall be reduced by $40,000.00 for the purpose of calculating the applicable tax and the business shall pay the tax on the reduced amount. If a business is engaged in more than one licensable activity, the $40,000.00 reduction shall be applied first to the gross receipts from the activity taxed at the highest tax rate. Any unused portion of the $40,000.00 reduction shall be next applied to the gross receipts of the remaining activities in descending tax rate order. The $40,000.00 reduction shall not apply to any estimates made under section 6-24 but shall apply to the correction of such estimates. (2) That this ordinance shall become effective on January 1, 2000. 0421:44709.1 An Affiliate of Media General P, O. Box 85333 Richmond, Virginia 23293-0001 (804) 649-6000 Advertising Affidavit (This is not a bill, please pay from CHESTERF I ELD CO. BO. SUPV ELKO B©A~D OF SUpERVIsORS o Box 40 CHESTERFI ELD VA invoice) 23832 220806 05/I8/99 i21 TAKE NOTICE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE BOARD O 1 x 35 322~ 70 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Publisher of THE RICHMOND TIMES-iDISPATCH This is to certify that the attached MEETINGS - COMINGEVENTS was published bY RiChm0nd NeWsPapers; linC., in the City virginiaI 5~the follOwing dates: 05/lZ/99 05/Z8/99 The first insertion being given .... Sworn to and subscribed before City of Rich My Commission expires ~lic 03/31/01 05/zz/99 Supervisor THIS IS NOT A BILL, PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE THANK YOU CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA Page 1 of 1 Meeting Date: May 25, 1999 Item Number: 15. Su~ect: Adjournment and Notice of Next Scheduled Meeting of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator's Commen~: County Administrator: Board Action Requested: Summary of Information' Motion of adjournment and notice of next scheduled meeting on June 23, 1999 at 4:00 p.m. Preparer: d~,.,r~c,~ ~ Title: Lisa H. EIko Attachments: -~ Yes No Clerk to the Board