06-14-1995 Packet.. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: June 14, 1995 Item Number: 6.A.
Subject:
Work Session regarding Rountrcy Report analyzing effect of building permit fee on the
competitiveness of the building industry
Count~, Administrator's Comments,..'
County Administrator:~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary oflnformation:
The attached report from Rountrey and Associates was prepared for the purpose of
analyzing the effect of the recent $125 increase in the building permit fee. Cecil Sears from
Rountrey will make a short presentation to the Board summarizing his study and its
conclusions.
~ /i County Attorney
Preparer: ~,~,,...~'c:~ Title:
Steven I~. ~Vlicas 0800:10446.1
00'l
Attachments: l E
ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE $125 BUILDING PERMIT
FEE..ON THE NEW HOMES MARKET IN CHESTERFIELD
Chesterfield County, Virginia
A Report Prepared For:
THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832-0040
As Of April 24, 1995
002
,_TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose Of The Study
Methodology
Summary Of Findings
THE RICHMOND AREA NEW HOMES MARKET
Home Prices And Sales Activity
Building And Land Price Comparisons
A COMPARISON OF PUBLIC COSTS TO HOME BUILDERS
ADDENDUM
Qualifications
Contingent And Limiting Conditions
PAGE
1
1
1
1
2
6
8
9
INTRODUCTION A.,,D EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ~
This section summarizes the purpose, findings and conclusions of the study. The study
is a comparative analysis of the fiscal impact of the uses permitted under the current
zoning of the land and the fiscal impact of the uses permitted under the rezoning request.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
Rountrey and Associates has been asked by the County of Chesterfield to review the new
homes market in the county and compare it to the markets in r-renrico and t~mover
counties. In addition, we have been asked to compare the public costs associated with
building in the three counties to reveal if any differences in these costs have had a
negative impact on builders' ability to operate profitably in Chesterfield. Specifically,
has the $125 building permit fee had a negative impact on the homebuilding market in
the county?
METHODOLOGY
Our approach to this assignment is to review the sales of new homes in the three counties
over time and to examine and compare the public costs associated with new construction
in each of the jurisdictions. We then compare the performance of the markets during
periods in which no fee was charged with those in which the $125 fee was charged.
Finally, we review the findings and identif7 market dynamics, such as employment
growth and interest rates that also impact the housing market.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Our research indicates that the $125 fee charged by Chesterfield County has not had a
negative impact on home building in the county. While there have been variations in the
housing market over time, we find that the most significant factor in explaining these
variations are changes in employment and job creation by income. As the market came
out of the recession of 1991-1992, the number of housing permits issued in Chesterfield
County grew. In fact, the number of single family permits issued in the county in 1993
(the only full year in which the permit fee has been in effect) was higher by 100 permits
(5.4%) than in 1992, the last full year in which no $125 fee was charged.
In addition, average new home prices in Chesterfield have rema/ned Iower than those in
I-Ienrico in every year from 1990 through 1994, primarily due to lower lot costs in
Chesterfield. Yet the average house size in both counties have remained very close. In
1994, for example, the average finished square feet of a new house in ~tenrico was 2,206
and 2,187 in Chesterfield. Thus builders are able to build similarly-sized homes in the
county at prices that are below those found in neighboring counties.
:mpioyment Growth
and Housing Starts
Richmond
MSA: 1981- 1994 (preliminary)
Permits (lO00s) New Jobs (lO00s)
11.6
--+-- 8F Permits
~ Job Growth
10.0
22.8
8.4
6.8
5.2
8.6
17.1
11.4
5.7
0.0
-5.7
2.0
1981
19831985198719891991199;3
-11.4
Rountrey and
..
Assocletes
004
Builders have aL.. indicated that the total burden oi ~,ablic costs have reduced their
competitiveness. Public costs of building a new house with water and sewer.are $4,008
ia Henrico County, $5,283 in Chesterfield County and $6,463 in Hanover County.
Therefore Chesterfield costs are below the costs in Hanover. Yet the higher public costs
in Hanover has not resulted in a downturn in the new homes market in that county. We
conclude that the $125 fee in Chesterfield hah not impacted builders' ability to provide
competitive housing ia the county.
THE RICHMOND AREA NEW HOMES MARKET
The new homes market ia the Richmond area has experienced a significant down mm
as a result of the recession ia 1991 and 1992. Thi.~ recession resulted ia the largest
number of jobs lost ia the area since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Housing starts
in 1991 were at their lowest level since 1982. The chart on the facing page shows the
trends ia both job growth ia the Richmond area and single family housing permits issued.
from 1981 through 1994. The graph clearly indicates how single family permits varies
directly with job growth. Periods of decline ia housing permits are the same years in
which job growth was either Iow or negative.
The graph shows that the peak year for single family permits ia the Richmond area was
1986 when local jurisdictions issued 11,048 permits. Etnployment growth during the
1980s peaked ia 1987 at 22,000 net new jobs. This spurred a new jump ia housing
permits the following year. Ia 1988 there wer~ 10,242 single family permits issued, up
from 9,485 in 1987. As employment growth declined in the early 1990s, housing
permits followed, reaching a Iow of 5,208 ia 1991. This ia the lowest level of permits
since 1982, when 4,094 permits were issued.
The chart also shows that the number of permits issued ia 1993 and 1994 do not track
the growth ia jobs as well as they did during the 1980s. The Richmond MSA has
created an average of over 12,000 net new jobs over the 1~ two years, yet the number
of single family permits issued has not rebounded to the leveh experienced during the
1980s. We believe that there are two major causes of the lack of permit growth. First,
the demographics of the Richmond area indicate that the median age of the population
is increasing. Fewer new households are being formed ia the 1990s per 1,000 people
than were being formed ia the 1980s. Secondly, the job growth occurring in the area is
concentrated ia the lower income employment hinge.
The table at the top of the following page shows our estimate of the number of jobs
created in the Richmond MSA for 1994 by industry group. The average wage is derived
from the Virginia Employment Commlnsion's ES-202 employment data. The table shows
that most of the job growth is occurring ia the lower paying jobs. About 58 % of all jobs
created last year paid annuai wages under $24,000. At the same time only 5 % of the
jobs paid average salaries over $34,000. During the 1990s, over 30% of the jobs created
2
OO5
paid over $34,000.
1994 Richmond Area Job Growth
by Expected p, nmml Income
Job Expected Pct. of
Industry Growth Ann Income New Jobs
Mining 2 $37,004 0.0%
Manufacturing (191) $36,568 -I. 1%
Federal Gev 127 $36,323 0.7%
Transportation 1,027 $34,969 5.8 %
Fin, Ins RE 2,702 $32,954 15.25
Wholesale Trade 1,025 $32,684 5.8 %
State Gev 1,173 $26,704 6.6 %
Local Gev 1,655 $25,505 9.3 %
Construction 573 $23,822 3.2 %
Services 4,568 $21,325 25.6 %
Agriculture 004) $20,756 - 1.7 %
Retail Trade 5,454 $14, 885 30.6 %
Total Jobs 17,808 $23,501 100.0 %
Jobs Share
lobs Over $34 K 964 5.4%
Jobs Under $24 K 10,291 57.8%
Source: VEC, Rountrey and Associates
Rountrey and Associates conducted a multiple regression analysis using four explanatory
variables (median age, national gross domestic product, average mortgage interest rate
and net jobs added). The dependent variable was single family housing permits issued
in the Richmond area between 1978 and 1994. The results confirm that a strong
relationship exists between the four 'X~ variables and single family permits. The
regression equation resulted in an R-squared value of 54.29%. The R-sqtmm is an
indication of how well the explanatory variable predict the outcome of the dependent
variable. In our case, 54% of the change in the number of permits issued could be
predicted with just the four variables used. We believe that including a variable for
change in purchasing power would improve the results even further.
Therefore we conclude that the most significant factors to influence the amount of
permits issued are employment growth and average mortgage interest rate. Notice on
the graph on the facing page that the decline in the number of permits issued in 1981-
3
006
0 0 o
0
I !
007
E
008
1982 was greater than the decline occurring in 1991-1992, even though the nulaber of
jobs lost in this latter period was greater. The key influencing factor was the'very high
mortgage rates of the early 1980s.
The graph on the preceding page, tiffed 'Job Growth and SF Permits," shows the same
data as presented on the opposite page only it matches the month by month change in
jobs with the change ia single family permits issued in Chesterfield, Henrico and
~anover counties. The graph indicates the strong decline from 1989 through 1991 and
then a gradual improvement from 1992 through 1994.
A companion graph on the facing page separates the trends in permits issued between
the three counties: Chesterfield, Hem'ico and Hanover. The graph indicates that permits
in Chesterfield began to decline in early 1988, while permits in Hearico and Hanover
peaked in early 1989 and then declined. Henrico and Famover bottomed out in the
Spring of 1991. Chesterfield County permits did not start improving until the Winter of
1992. Sign/fieanfly, however, the number of permits issued in Chesterfield County after
the $125 fee was introduced is higher than was the ease dttring the year prior to the fee.
Thus any argument that the $125 fee has resulted in a decl;,e in building activity is not
supported by the permit evidence. All periods of decline occurred in the years prior to
the $125 fee being charged. There is no correlation between the use of the fee and a
corresponding decline in the number of permits issued in the county.
The table below shows the number of permits issued in Chesterfield, Hearico and
Hanover from 1991 through 1994. The years are separated into January - Iune and July
- December. This is done because the $12.5 fee was used in all of 1993. It was
reinstated in 3uly of 1994 and h,~ been in effect ever since. We are including the prior
years' permit information for comparative purposes.
Single family Permits Issued: January-June, 1991 - 1994
Chesterfield, Hem'ico and ]:[anover counties
Period Chesteffld Henrlco gr. hover Corn m ents
Jan-Jun 91 1125 729 388 No fee
Jan-Jun 92 1012 853 455 No fee
Jan-Jun 93 1037 957 535 $125 Fee
Jan-Jun 94 1078 1039 627 No fee
Builders take more permits in the first half of the year than they do in the second half
because the weather is more conducive to construction and the typical peak buying
009
months are May through August. The.building permit fee was in use only f0$ t, he 1993
period shown. Yet the number of permits increased in 1993 over the prior year. The
increase in Chesterfield between the f'u'st six months of 1992 and the first six months of
1993 are small when compared to the growth occurring in Henrico and Hanover. Yet,
as the graph on the facing page reveals, the housing market in Chesterfield did not hit
bottom until late in 1992. The markets in the other counties were beginning to recover
during that year.
The same slower growth trend is noticed in the first half of 1994 in Chesterfield. The
increase in the number of permits issued is much smaller than for Henri¢o and Hanover.
Thus-the elimination of the fee in the fa-st haft of 1994 did not result in a spurt in the
demand for single family permits. Rather, a slow steady growth in permits issued
occurred in the first six months of 1994 as it did in the same period in 1993. The
placement of the fee in 1993 did not cause a drop in permits issued in 1993, nor did its
removal cause a jump in permits issued in 1994. The table below tracks the same
information for the second half of the years studied.
Single family Permits Issue: July-December, 1991 - 1994
Chesterfield, Henrico and Hanover counties
Period Chesterfid Henrico Hanover Corn ments
Jul-Dec 91 841 705 304 No fee
Jul-Dec 92 836 747 402 No fee
Jul-Dec 93 911 859 448 $125 Fee
/Iul-Dec 94 876 870 561 $125 Fee
The second half of each year is marked by generally lower levels of permitting activity.
The weather becomes more of a problem and starting a new house ia the late fall or
winter is usually avoided by area builders. Chesterfield County did not charge the $125
fee in the first two periods shown (1991 and 1992). The fee was being charged in the
second two periods (1993 and 1994). In each of the four years the number of permits
issued in Chesterfield County was greater than in either of the other counties. Secondly,
the total number of permits issued in periods with the permit fee was greater than during
periods without the fee (1,787 compared to 1,677). Thus we find that the fee has gain
had no impact on builder's abffity to'build residential units in Chesterfield County.
The data does show that in the last half of 1994, permits in Chesterfield declined while
permits in Henrico and Hanover increased. Could this be the result of the fee? We
believe that market demand, not the fee, was the major factor. Employment data from
5
010
Cl~terfield County New Hom~,Sales
by Price Range: 1990- 19~4
Price Range 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
Lip to 89,999 706 606 527 313 152
90,000 I19,999 443 397 432 486 467
120,000 149,999 319 307 363 376 387
150,000 179,999 263 203 211 244 258
180,000 209,999 102 98 75 87 102
210,000 239,999 69 61 55 54 58
240,000 274,999 66 51 54 43 49
275,000 & Up 118 80 74 81 84
Total Sales 2086 1803 1791 1684 1557
Average Price $134,230 $130,417 $131,584 $137,710 $147,204
Henrico County New Home Sales
by Price Range: 1990- 1994
Price Range 1990 1991 .1992 1993 1994
Lip to 89,999 437 379 337 316 233
90,000 119,999 331 345 373 308 297
120,000 149,999 242 216 284 342 340
150,000 179,999 177 139 187 218 245
180,000 209,999 73 62 105 121 137
210,000 239,999 62 60 42 70 108
240,000 274,999 69 38 61 59 78
275,000 & Up 99 70 87 120 134
Total Sales 1490 1309 1476 1554 1572
Average Price $141,911 $135,874 $141,549 $150,004 $159,982
Hanover County New Home Sales
.by Price Range: 1990- 1994
Price Range 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
Lip to 89,999 64 69 93 86 51
90,000 119,999 141 127 115 137 103
120,000 149,999 120 110 135 141 138
150,000 179,999 65 41 68 I00 133
180,000 209,999 40 22 18 37 91
210,000 239,999 16 8 12 16 42
240,000 274,999 14 4 2 8 16
275,000 & Lip 9 5 7 5 6
Total Sales 469 386 450 530 580
Average Price $136,263 $126,427 $128,964 $133,136 $150,894
Source: Rountrey and Associates, Inc.
011
the Virginia Emp,oyment Commission shows that betw~n the third quarter of 1993 and
the third quarter of 1994, Chesterfield County added 5,421 jobs. During the sense period
l~earico added 8,942 jobs and I-lanover added 1,067jobs. Thus Chesterfield was issuing
16.0 single family permits for every 100 net new jobs in the county. Meanwhile, the
counties to the north were generating 14.3 housing permits for every 100 net new jobs
in the two counties. Thus we conclud~ that Chesterfield builders were responding to the
relatively smaller job growth on the south side of the James River than was occurring in
the suburbs on the north side during the second half of 1994.
HOME PRICES AND SALES ACTIVITY
Our research reported in the prior section indicates that the $125 fee charged by
Chesterfield County has not had a negative impact on building permits issued in the
county. While there have been variations in the housing market over time, we find that
the most significant factors in explaining these variations are changes in employment,
mortgage interest rates and job creation by income. We now mm to home selling prices
and lot prices from the three counties. The basic question we are attempting to address
is whether or not the $125 fee has had a negative impact on new home prices in the
county relative to the prices being achieved ia the neighboring counties of ltem'ico and
ltanover.
The table on the facing page shows the number of new home sales by price range for
Chesterfield, Hem'ico and Hanover counties for the years 1990 - 1994. Chesterfield
County has had more new home sales than either of the other two counties in each year
except 1994. In addition, the average new home price in Chesterfield County has been
consistently lower than in Henrico County while remaining fairly comparable to prices
in Hanover.
Activity in all three counties declined from 1990 to 1991. Chesterfield new home sales
dropped 14 %, Henrico sales dropped 12 % and l:ranover sales declined 18 %. Sales at the
lower and upper ends of the price ranges suffered the greatest decline. For example,
sales of homes priced over $240,000 fell from 168 sales in Hearico in I990 to 108 sales
in 1991, a drop of 36%. Hanover sales in this price range declined from 23 sales in
1990 to only 9 sales in 1991. Chesterfield sales fell from 184 to 131.
Sales in the lower price ranges also declined in Chesterfield and Henrico, but improved
in Hanover during 1991. After 1991, new home sales improved in Henrico and
Hanover, but have continued to decline in Chesterfield from 1991 through 1994. Sales
of new homes in Chesterfield in 1994 were 25 % below their 1990 level. By comparison,
1994 sales in Hem-ice were 6% above their 1990 level and in Hanover sales were 24%
higher than in 1990. Since this trend in Chesterfield began years before the building
permit fee was introduced, we believe that the fee has not been an influencing factor.
6
012
Chesterfield County SF Building Permit Activity by the
10 Largest"'lilders in the Richmond Ar~'''~ 1992- 1994
SF Building Permits Taken Out
Rank Builder 1992 1993 1994 Total
1 Teal Building 0 0 18 18
2 Eagle Construction 2 6 22 30
3 Richmond Homes 9 35 22 66
4 Parker Lancaster 48 49 38 135
5 McGum Company 19 16 18 53
6 Tomac Corporation 25 55 67 147
7 Ryan Homes 0 0 0 0
8 Emerald Homes 61 40 55 156
9 Boone, Boone 0 0 0 0
10 Dumont Construction 13 20 21 54
Group Total 177 221 261 659
Henrico County SF Building Permit Activity by the
10 Largest Builders in the Richmond Area: 1992- 1994
SF Building Permits Taken Out
Rank Builder 1992 1993 1994 Total
I Teal Building 99 113 119 331
2 Eagle Construction 212 198 158 568
3 Richmond Homes 76 61 72 209
4 Parker Lancaster 9 31 36 76
$ McGurn Company 39 64 72 175
6 Tomac Corporation 20 16 18 54
7 Ryan Homes 148 165 196 509
8 Fanerald Homes 41 48 46 135
9 Boone, Boone 40 41 71 152
10 Dumont Construction 12 7 9 28
Group Total 696 744 797
Hanover County S1t Building Permit Activity by the
10 Largest Builders in the Richmond Area: 1992- 1994
SF Building Permits Taken Out
Rank Builder 1992 1993 1994 Tt~tni
I Teal Building 25 37 66 128
2 Eagle Construction 0 0 3 3
3 Richmond Homes 15 12 9 36
4 Parker Lancaster 16 34 16 66
5 McGum Company 11 9 25 45
6 Tomac Corporation 9 22 16 47
7 Ryan Homes 0 0 0 0
8 Emerald Homes 14 20 23 57
9 Boone, Boone 0 0 0 0
10 Dumont Construction 0 1 I 2
Group Total 90 135 159 384
Source: Rountrey and Associates, Inc.
01;3
Rather, the key lies in the nature of the building industry in Chesterfield as compared to
Henrico and Hanover. The builders in Chesterfield tend to be smaller builders than those
on the north side of the river. Of the top ten builders by volume of closed sales in 1994,
only three are headquartered in Chesterfield County. More significantly, these larger
builders are doing the vast majority of their building on the north side of the James
River. Some were active in Chesterfield in the mid-1980s but found it difficult to
compete with the small, local Chesterfield builders. The typical local Chesterfield
builder was operating with Iow overhead and many were father and son teams.
The table on the facing page reveals the permitting activity of the top ten builders in the
greater Richmond area. These builders took out a combined 1,149 permits in 1994. Of
this total, only 26I (23 %) were issued in Chesterfield County. The vast majority of the
permits to these builders were issued by Hertrico County (797, or 69 %). Over the last
three years, this group of builders took out 3,146 permits within the jurisdictions under
study, 71% of which were issued in ltearico County.
Among this group of builders in the top 10 list, Dumont Construction had the highest
1994 average new home price at $317,371. Emerald ltomes had the lowest average
price at $101,993. Among these top builders, Parker Lancaster, Tomac Corporation and
Dumont Construction have taken out more single family permits in Chesterfield than in
Henrico. The other seven builders have concentrated on the Hearico and ltanover
markets. The point of this infornlation iS that with the more stable builders working
outside of the county, momentum coming out of the recession was lacking among the
Chesterfield County burrers.
To further complicate the matter, many of these builders depended on one source of
construction financing, Investors Savings and Loan. When this financial institution was
closed, many builders in Chesterfield were left without a steady source of financing and
projects under construction that Lacked a commitment to fund their completion. Some
of these builders have simply gone out of business. These builders were' supplying many
of the low-end units in the county. As a result the volume of new homes priced under
$90,000 sold in Chesterfield has plummeted from over 700 in 1990 to around 150 in
1994. This price range home has also declined in the other counties but not to the extent
they have in Chesterfield. Thus we conclude the variations in the building market in
Chesterfield has been the major cause of the decline in new home sales. In any case, this
decline preceded the $125 fee and thus we conclude that the fee has not been the reason
for the decline in the new homes market.
The area's large builders do appear to be increasingly more active in Chesterfield. The
growth in permits issued to these builders between 1992 and i994 was almost 48 %,
compared to about 24% for permits issued to these builders in all three jurisdictions.
Thus these builders are increasing their construction activity in the county at a faster rate
than they are doing elsewhere in the region. The presence of the $125 permit fee during
1993 and 1994 did not deter these builders from increasing their activity in the county.
7
014
Chesterfield New Home & Lot Sales: 1990-1994
Number Avg New Average Home Price Lot-
Year Sold Home Price Lot Price less Lot Pr. Price Ratio
1990 2086 $134,230 $23,997 $110,233 17.9 %
1991 1803 130,468 23,325 107,143 17.9%
1992 1791 131,503 24,798 106,705 18.9%
1993 1684 137,710 26,177 111,533 19.0%
1994 1557 147,204 30,670 116,534 20.8 %
Hanover New Home & Lot Sales: 1990-1994
Number Avg New Average Home Price Lot-
Year Sold Home Price Lot Price less Lot Pr. Price Ratio
1990 469 $136,263 $25,914 $110,349 19.0%
1991 386 126,427 26,860 99,567 21.2%
1992 450 128,964 28,732 100,232 22.3 %
1993 530 133,136 29,501 103,635 22.2%
1994 580 150,428 32,770 117,658 21.8%
Henrico New Home & Lot Sales: 1990-1994
Number Avg New Average Home Price Lot-
Year Sold Home Price Lot Price less Lot Pr. Price Ratio
1990 1490 $141,911 $32,548 $109,363 22.9%
1991 1309 135,874 34,327 101,547 25.3 %
1992 1476 141,549 38,494 103,055 27.2%
1993 1554 150,004 37,939 112,065 25.3 %
1994 1572 159,982 41,191 118,791 25.7%
Total Market New Home & Lot Sales: 1990-1994
Number Avg New Average Home Price Lot-
Year Sold Home Price Lot Price less Lot Pr. Price Ratio
1990 4045 $137,295 $27,369 $109,926 19.9%
1991 3498 132,045 27,832 · 104,213 21.1%
1992 3717 135,185 30,713 104,472 22.7%
1993 3768 142,137 31,495 110,641 22.2%
,'1994 3709 153,124 .35,458 117,666 23.2%
Source: Rouatrey aud Associate. s, luc.
these builders are becoming more active in the county because they perceive a p~fitable
opportunity exists in Chesterfield.
BUILDING AND LAND PRICE COMPARISONS
Another component of this issue is whether the $125 fee has resulted in a loss of
competitiveness among new home sales in Chesterfield as compared to Eenrico and
Hanover. In order to explore this question, we must examine the components of housing
prices, chiefly the building and the land. The table on the facing page compares the
average new home sale price in the three counties from 1990 through I994. We also
show the average residential building lot price and the lot price ratio. The lot price ratio
is the percentage of the total home selling price that is represented in the price of the
subdivision lot.
The data in the table shows that while new home prices in Chesterfield County have been
lower than the averages in the other counties by $7,000 to $12,000, most of this
difference is in the price of the land. The column identified as "Home Price less Lot
Price" shows the building component of the total price of Chesterfield homes varies less
than 2 % from those figures in either Hearico or l:[anover. Thus most of the difference
in prices is in the cost of the lots in Henrico and Hanover being substantially higher than
in Chesterfield, not in the cost of the actual structure.
The table also lists the average new home price over the last five years within each
county. In Chesterfield County the average new home price has risen from $134,230 in
1990 to $147,204 in 1994, a rise of $12,974. The average lot price has risen from
$23,997 to $30,670 (a difference of $6,673). Therefore about 51% of the increase in
home prices in the county is due to the increase in lot prices.
the table shows the average prices for each of the counties and a stlmmal'y at the bottom
of the page. Using this summary, the average new home price in the Richmond suburbs
has risen from $137,295 to $153,124, or $15,829. The average lot price has increased
from $27,369 to $35,458, or $8,089. The change in the building component has been
$7,740 in the region and $6,301 in Chesterfield. Thus the builders in the county have
been able to provide housing to residents at competitive prices and the price increases in
the county have been smaller than for the region as a whole.
The graphs on the following page compares the average new home price in Chesterfield
with that of Henfico and Hanover. The charts separate out the land component from the
building component and lists the average lot price ratio for each county for each year.
The higher the lot price ratio, the more of the total price of the house is represented by
the cost of the land. The charts show that Chesterfield County has lower lot price ratios
8
016
Chesterff~ Average New Home Sal'~'Prices
showing Building & Land Components with Lot Price Ratio
$160.000
$15o.ooo 20.8~.
Sl 40.000 19.0~,
$130.000 ~
$120.000
$110.000
$100.000 --
$90.000-
$80.000-
$70.000
$60.000
$50.000 --
$40.000 --
$30.000 --
$20.000
$10.000 --
$0.000
lggo 1991 lg92 lg93 1994
Home Price
Hanover Average New Home Sale Prices
showing Building & Land Components with Lot Price Ratio
$160.000
$150.000
$1~o.ooo
$130.000
$120.000--
$110.000
$1oo.ooo
~ $9o.0oo
~ $80.000
,~, S70.000 --
$60.000
$50.000
$40.000 --
$30.000
$20.000
$10.000
$0.000
1990
1991 1992
~Home Price l~-'~--'~S~Lot PHce
lg93
1994
Source: Rouurrey and Associates, lac.
017
Chesterfield Average New Home S~!¢ Prices
showing BuikPng & Land Components with ~.ot Price Ratio
$160.000
$150.000
$140.000
$1.30.000
$120.000
$110.000
$100.000
$90.000
S80.000
$50.000
$50.000
$40.000
$30.000
$20.000
SLO.OOO
$0.00o
17.9~
18.9~
19.
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
Home Price ~ Lot PHce
Henrico Average New Home Sale Prices
showing Building & Land Components with Lot Price Ratio
$160.000
$150.000
$140.000
$1~o.ooo
$12o.ooo
$11o.ooo
$1oo.ooo
890.000
$80.000
$70.000
$60.000
S5o.ooo
$40.000
$30.000
820.000
$1o.000
So.ooo
22..9; 27.23;
1990 1991 1992 1993 lg94
Home Price ~ lot PHca
Source: Rountrey and Asxociates, Inc.
018
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
~. ,-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ c~
than for either of the other counties. Thus buyers of homes in the county are~gening a
greater portion of their housing dollar' going to buy living space and less going to buy
land. We believe this represents a competitive advantage for housing in the county and
this advantage does not change during those years in which the $125 permit fee has been
in effect.
Finally, we find no evidence that the fee has caused builders in Chesterfield to provide
smaller sized homes in the market. The table below compares the average finished and
unfinished square feet listed on the building permits issued in the three jurisdictions over
the 1992 through 1994 period. The only year in which there was no building permit fee
was 1992. The fee was in effect for all of 1993 and half of I994. Yet the average house
size' has been rising during the years thax the fee has been in effect. Further, the average
finished square footage of new homes permitted in Chesterfield in 1994 was actually
greater than that for Hanover and only 20 square feet smaller than that for Hearico. In
summary, builders in the county have not had to reduce the size of homes they are
selling in order to remain competitive. They are building homes of about equal size in
all three jurisdictions.
Sizes of Single Family Houses Permitted in Chesterfield,
Hem'ico and Hanover counties: 1992 - 1994
Avg. 1992 Unit Size Avg. 1993 Unit Size Avg. 1994 Unit Size
County Fin SF Unf SF Fin SF Unf SF Fin SF Unf SF
Chestrf. 2,030 596 2, 110 662 2,186 696
Henrico 2,073 529 2,170 575 2,206 577
Hanover 2,033 499 2,190 301 2,087 572
ilding mzpector~ offices, ,;.r. comp/led by Rountrey and Associates
A COMPARISON OF PUBLIC COSTS TO HOME BUILDERS
Builders have routinely complained about rising costs. Lumber prices rose dramatically
over the June 1993 through June 1994 period. Labor wages have been escalating over
the last twelve to eighteen months. Roofing materials, window components, major
appliances and many other building items have had rising costs. The chart on the facing
page shows the trends in construction costs for wood frame construction in the Richmond
area as reported by the Marshall & Swift Valuation Service. Costs were held steady
9
020
through the recession of 1991, but began to rise in 1992. l~rices jumped significantly in
1993 and have remained high ever since. The total cost of constructing an agfage size
and quality home in the Richmond area has risen over 11% from 1990 to 1994, or just
under 3 % per year. As a point of comparison, the $125 fee represents one tenth of one
percent (0.1%) of the average price of the building component of homes built in
Chesterfield in 1994.
The relevant point is not that there have been cost increases, but that the housing market
in the Richmond area has adjusted and produced an increasing number of units during
the period. In addition to the general costs of labor and materials, public costs are also
a signifi~t expense for builders.
The table on the facing page compares the public costs faced by builders and developers
in Chesterfield, Hearico and Hanover counties. In order to make a comparison, we are
using the average house size in Chesterfield County for i994. The table confums that
public costs are significant. In Chesterfield County the cost of various fees could reach
$1,356 on homes with well and septic systems. If the property is on public water and
sewer, the cost would be about $5,283. Finally, if the builder had to pay the highest
cash proffer, the public costs would reach about $10,366 for our average sized house.
This maximum fee represents about 7% of the selling price of new homes selling in
Chesterfield County in 1994.
/towever, the public costs in Chesterfield County without cash proffers are not the
highest in the area. Chesterfield costs with water and sewer are actually over $1.100 less
than in Hanover County. Further, the relation of the $125 fee to the total pub/lc costs
is so small (less than 3 % of public costs with water and sewer) that its impact on the
total development process is negligible. The higher public costs in Hanover County,
including water and sewer, has not caused a downturn in the new homes market in that
county. Thus we conclude that the $125 public fee used in Chesterfield County has not
led to a weakening of the competitive position of builders in the county.
l0
O~g
!
!
I
!
I
ADDENDUM
'' QUALIFICATIONS .,
Cecil E. Sears
Senior Associate and Director of Economic Research, Rountrey and Associates, Inc.,
Real Estate Economists, Appraisers, and Consultants, Richmond, Virginia. Rountrey and
Associates is also the Virginia member office of the Valuation Network, Inc.
Experience
Senior Research Associate with Urban I. and Institute, 1982 to 1986, conducting
nationwide research programs in real e, smm finance, investment, and urban economics.
Served as Director of Administration of National Council of Real Estate Investment
Fiduciaries, 1984 to 1986.
Mortgage Consultant with Mortgage Systems, Inc., 1981 to 1982, re, searching and
writing various contracts, creating course materials for'trnlnlng of bank personnel in
real estate finance and underwriting commercial loan placements.
Assistant Director of Economics and F. ducafion for Mortgage Bankers Association of
America, 1977 to 1981, researching and writing on real estate fiuance, ~dmini.~ering
educational programs, and a professional designation program.
Staff appraiser with Industrial ~h Realty, Norfolk, Virglni~, 1971 to 1975,
conducting residential and commercial at~p~ and market studies.
Education
Centre College of Kentucky, B.A. Degree in History and Economics, 1971.
Virginia Commonwealth University, M.S. Degree in Paml Estate and Urban Land
Developmem, 197:5.
Appraisal In~tute, I-A and I-B.
Courses I and H of the School of Mortgage Banking, among others.
Memberships
Richmond Association of RealWrs, Virg/ni:~ Assochtion of Realtors, and National
Association of Realtors - Member.
Urban Land Institute.
American Real Estate and Urban F. conomic Association.
American Real F, sme Society.
Virginia Association of Business
Teaching and Publications
Instructor of Finance at Old Dominion University, 1975 to 1977, teaching
undergraduate courses in real estate appraisal, finance, development, and investment.
Assistant Professor, Adjunct Faculty at the University of Maryland, 1978 to 1982,
teaching courses in ~ estate principles and finance.
lapanese Re~ Es~te Investment in the l~rli~ed $~te~, ~/apan Society, 1987.
Mixed Use Development Fr~-dbook, Urban Land Institute (1987).
Dollars and Percents of Development Fin~.~g% Urban Land Institute, 1986.
Dollars and Cents of Shopp_ in~ Centers. Urban Land Institute (various issues)
Rental Housin~ with Paul O'l~va, Urban rand Institute, 1986.
Understandi~ Real F.~tate Apprise! (Course Manual), Mortgage Bankers Association,
1980. -
024
CONTINGENT AND LIMITING' CONDITIONS
GENERAL CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. This report is an authorized copy only if it is signed in blue .in1(.
2. The information on which this report is based has been obtained from
sources normally used by Rountrey and Associates and is considered reliable
but is in no sense gnar4ntc~.
3. No opinion of a legal or engineering nature is imendonally ~xpr~ssed or
implied, and no responsibility is assumed for mauers of this nature.
whether of record, or ome~s~ prowc~.~, are assumeo ~o be corral.
exhibits in this r~port are included only to assist the trader in vis,~,~llzing the
prol~rty.
5. Rountmy and Associates reserves the right to alter its opinion of value on
the basis of information withheld or not discovered in the normal course of
a diligent investigation.
6. l~ountruy a~d Associat~ is not required to give t~stimony or to app~lr in
court by reason of t_his r~port, with mfemne~ to the property in que~stion,
unless arrangements have been mad~ previously.
7. The fee charged for this mpon does not include payment for testimony or
for further consultation.
8. This report is to be used in whole, not in part; the contents, the identity of
the appraiser(s) and/or Rountruy and Associate, shall not 1~ used in
~onn~ion with any other report nor dissernin~zed to the public through
advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other medi~ without the prior
written permission of Rountmy and Associates.
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNT~
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page
AGENDA
June 14, 1995 Item Number: 6.B.
1 o fl
Subject:
Work session on the County's 1995-96 Community Development Block
Grant and HOME Consolidated Plan.
Count~ Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator: /% ~
BoardAction Requested:
Set public hearing for June 28, 1995 to consider the County's 1995-96
CDBG and HOME Consolidated Plan and authorize an increase in
appropriations in the amount of $625,000 for HOME grant funds.
Summary of Information:
The County's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program
Consolidated Plan for 1995-96 is required to be submitted to the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development by July 14, 1995. The
submission must follow a required public hearing by the Board of
Supervisors. HUD then has 45 days to review the program. A CDBG
review committee comprised of County staff and citizen
representatives has made its recommendation to the County
Administrator on the County's 1995-96 CDBG Program including HOME
funding. The attached material is the County Administrator,s
recommended CDBG and HOME Investment Program for 1995-96 including 34
projects to be funded with the County's 1995-96 allocation of
$1,454,000 in CDBG and $500,000 in HOME funds. The material includes
the CDBG review committee,s recommendations, the County
Administrator,s recommended changes, and the review committee,s
guiding philosophy statement.
Preparer: ~'"~~~ l~ Title:
~---~Lewis C. Wendell
CDBG Director
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
The Chesterfield County CDBG review committee consisting of representatives from county
departments and target area business and residential civic groups is pleased to submit a
recommended 1995-96 Community Development Block Grant program. The review
committee considered a total of 62 requests submitted by various groups and county
departments.
The review committee agreed it was important to articulate the philosophy underlying the
choices that were made. With over $11 million in requests and only $2 million in available
funds, those choices were difficult to make.
Primary elements of the philosophy are as follows:
The intent of the CDBG program is to help revitalize deteriorated neighborhoods with
the most demonstrated need. Priority was given to projects in those areas exhibiting
the greatest extent of physical deterioration.
Projects clearly within the scope or mandate of other county, state, or federal agencies
were given a lower priority.
A greater priority was given to projects providing a more direct stimulus to
neighborhoods to become physically, economically, and socially healthier places in
which to live and work.
Projects that demonstrated the greatest ability to provide permanent improvement to
neighborhoods on a long-term basis were given a higher priority.
Projects that increased the self-sufficiency of individuals and organizations were
given the higher priority.
Recommended Projects
1995-96 CI)BG and HOME Program
Sources
Uses
CDBG $1,454,000
HOME
Federal 379,000
State 121,000
County match * 125,000
TOTAL $2,079,000
Public Improvements
Housing
HOME Contingency
Public Services
Code Enforcement
Special Economic Development
Administration and Planning
TOTAL
$ 656,000
726,000
65,000
208,000
34,000
96,000
294,000
$2,079,000
*Required for HOME funds
Recommended Projects
1995-96 CDBG Program
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Requested
$200,000
Recommended
$200,000
This project would provide funding for the construction of the Ettrick Community Building. The
project bids came in $300,000 over budget. Funds were used from program income and other CDBG
budget line items to cover the costs. $140,000 would be used to pay for construction management,
telephones, and building furnishings. $50,000 would be returned to the Business Loan Program and
$10,000 returned to the Ettrick Historic Study accounts.
Requested
$200,000
Recommended
$100,000
A consultant has been working with the community to design streetscaping plans for Chesterfield
Avenue. The funds would pay for the first phase of a multi-phase program to provide special
streetlighting, landscaping, and other amenities.
Requested
$100,000
Recommended
$100,000
A study is currently underway to assess the need for and feasibility of a satellite government services
facility in the Jeff Davis Corridor area. This project would provide funding for design and
engineering of a facility if one is recommended. This project would also incorporate a community
center for use by area neighborhoods including Kingsdale.
Requested
$125,000
Recommended
$125,000
This project would pay for ADA facility improvements county-wide so that general fund dollars can
be freed up to be used as required county match for $500,000 in HUD HOME funds.
O29
-2-
Requested Rec0mmended
$20,000 $20,000
This funding would make improvements to the areas adjacent to Falling Creek that have been
included in the Parks and Recreation Greenway Plan for Falling Creek.
Reque~sted Recommended
$2,000 $2,000
Landscaped rest area along the walking trail consisting of two benches, graveled area, and
landscaping.
· ============================:: :'""::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::5:::::
$15,000
Recommended
$15,000
A sidewalk to connect the sidewalk at Allerton Street to the Bensley Fire Station at Wentworth Street.
Re~_ues~ed Recom mended
$30,000 $20,000
Landscaping the Route 1 intersection with Route 288.
$174,000
Recommended
$74,000
Funds to begin sidewalk and lighting improvements in the Meadowdale area.
030
-3-
HOUSING PROJECTS
:::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::5 5::::::::::: ::: :::. ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Requested
$225,000 (HOME)
Rehabilitate 15 single family homes in CDBG target areas.
Recommended
$225,000 (HOME)
$75,000 (HOME)
Rehabilitate 5 single family homes county-wide.
Recommended
$75,000 (HOME)
:':+:::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 5:::::
$39,000 (CDBG)
Recommended
$39,000 (CDBG)
Funding to retain the Residential Revitalization Coordinator. The Residential Revitalization
Coordinator provides staff support to carry out residential improvement projects including housing
and public infrastructure. The Residential Coordinator also provides substantial staff support to
neighborhood civic groups.
$60,000 (CDBG)
Recommended,
$30,000 (CDBG)
Funds to pay administrative costs for this non-profit housing organization.
$15,000 (CDBG)
,Recommended
$12,000 (CDBG)
Funds to offset costs to CARES for homeless individuals and families from Chesterfield County.
031
-4-
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ===================== ::: !:: i i::: i::: i i::: !:: :,' .:i[::;::.:.:.:;z:. · · · :. }i..,, !.,.. :,... :.: ....... ::,,.:::...::'.
Requested
$34,000 (HOME)
Recommended
$34,000 (HOME)
Funds to pay half the cost of mortgage down payment/closing costs for low to moderate income
families.
Requested
$100,000 (HOME)
Recommended
$100,000 (HOME)
Funds to construct 4 new homes for low to moderate income families in target areas.
Requested
$104,000 (HOME)
Funds to assist families with mortgage down payment.
Recommended
$104,000 (HOME)
Requested
$10,000 (CDBG)
Recommended
$1o,ooo (COBG)
Funds for Interfaith Housing to hire a person to coordinate client intake and market properties.
$22,000 (HOME)
Recommended
$22,000 (HOME)
Funds to provide support to the activities of HABITAT in Chesterfield.
$15,000 (CDBG)
Funds to support the operations of CARITAS - homeless assistance.
Recommended
$15,000 (CDBG)
-5-
Requested
$42,000 (CDBG)
Recommende0
$20,000 (CDBG)
Funds to support HOME activities related to the County CDBG Program.
Requested
$80,000 (CDBG)
RecommenOed
$4o, ooo (C )BG)
Funds to support the activities of a non-profit housing provider assisting low income families in
Chesterfield become self-sufficient.
PUBLIC SERVICE PRO~IECTS
.'"'.:,',:~. ========================================================== ..... ~ · ,.~,.
Requested Recommended
$56,000 $50,000
Funds to operate programs in the newly constructed Ettrick Community Building.
Requested
$40,000
Funds for the fourth year of VITAL, a Social Services dropout
children from families on AFDC, at Falling Creek Middle School.
Recommended
$40,000
prevention program for at-risk
Requested Reco m m end ed
$6,000 $6,000
Funds to purchase uniforms and equipment.
$40,000
Recommended
$40,000
Funds to provide scholarships and organizational funding for youth recreation and athletic programs.
033
-6-
~ Recommended
$36,000 $20,000
Funding for mentoring and educational support programs at Chalkley and Bellwood Elementary
Schools.
R_g.ql!_CaI~ .Recommende~
$22,000 $20,000
Funds to continue the work being done at Dupont Square Apartments to help residents of the Jeff
Davis Corridor that have limited English speaking skills.
Requested Reco m m end ed,
$2,000 $2,000
Scholarships to athletic programs for low and moderate income participants in CDBG target areas.
R_g..ql!_eat~ Recommended
$30,000 $30,000
Funds to continue the Bensley Seniors Recreation program.
ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNINC-
$224,000
Recommended
$224,000
Administration costs to run the County's CDBG program. Costs include salaries, benefits, computers,
rent, utilities, telephone, advertising, equipment, automobile, and other administrative costs.
The CDBG Office is requesting 1 additional full-time position (planner) and 1 part-time clerical
position to cope with a 35% increase in funding and significant increase in projects and programs
administered.
034
-7-
Requested
$50,000
Recommended
$50,000
Funds to reimburse the County for budgeting, accounting, payroll, legal, and other costs associated
with the CDBG program.
Requested Recommended
$41,000 $20,000
Improvements to the Falling Creek Ironworks historic site.
CODE ENFORCEMENT
Requested
$34,000
Recommended
$34,000
Funds to continue position devoted to code enforcement in Jeff Davis and Ettrick areas.
SPECIAL ECONOMIC DEVEIJOPMENT
:::;:::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Requested Recommended
$46,000 $46,000
Funds to continue position devoted to special economic development and working with business
groups in CDBG target areas.
Requested
$50,000
Recommended
$50,000
Funds to hire engineering consultant to study feasibility of building access road along 95 and Route
1 to provide access to industrial property in Enterprise Zone.
035
UNFUNDED REOUESTS (low priori _ty proj¢cB)
In order of priority:
Ampthill/GatesMill Park
Traffic Control Devices
Kingsdale Community Center
DARE
Ettrick Railroad Station Study
Gateway Homes
Chesterfield Alternatives
HOME Fair Housing
Rosy Grier Pavilion
Bensley Parent Coordinator
Ettrick Bus Service
Jeff Davis Bus Service
Cardiac Defibrillator - Ettrick
Schools Funding
Jeff Davis Sidewalks
Ettrick Sidewalks
Chalkley Storage
Camp Baker
Dundas & Strathmore
Jeff Davis Road Improvements
Dupuy Drainage
Ettrick Park Improvements
Matoaca Park Improvements
Winfree Avenue Drainage
Harrowgate & Treely Lanes
Rowanty Court
Grange Hall Elementary Improvements
Millside Access
TOTAL UNFUNDED
$ 20,000
28,000
100,000
6,000
15,000
32,000
87,000
30,000
25,000
22,000
170,000
565,000
12,000
450,000
425,000
50,000
8,000
50,000
750,000
390,000
395,000
50,000
35,000
200,000
250,000
50,000
15,000
4,800,000
$ 9,030,000
(CDBG)
(CDBG)
(CDBG)
(CDBG)
086
County Administrator's Recommended Changes
Take $25,000 out of ADA Improvements and fund Camp Baker's request for funds
for a kitchen facility at $25,000 ($50,000 requested).
Take $10,000 from Youth Programs and $10,000 from Indirect Costs to fund
$20,000 of School Administration program for at-risk four year olds.
Meeting Date:
June 14,
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
1995 Item Number:
1 1
Page __of ~
Subject:
DEFERRED
Loan Waiver and Appropriation of Funds to Health Center Commission
Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator: L. ~, F~_.
'dAction Requested:
Waive/forgive outstanding one million dollar loan made to Commission on June 8, 1994, and
appropriate and transfer one and one-half million dollars from the Capital Improvement
Reserve Fund to the Health Center Commission as an equity contribution for the construction
of a replacement Nursing Home.
S ummar7 of Information:
At its meeting on May 10, 1995, the Board of Supervisors conducted a public hearing as
required for an appropriation of this magnitude. After the Public Hearing was concluded,
the Board deferred action until June 14, 1995.
Members of the Commission will be present to answer any questions the Board members
may have regarding this appropriation.
Prepare Title:
Rob~frt L. Masden
Attachments: Yes No
Deputy County Administrator
O88
COMMON VEA LTH oF VIRGINIA
Donald R. Stern, M.D., M.P.H. Department of Health
Ac~ing State Health Commissioner
P O BOX 2448
RICHMOND, VA 23218
TDD 1-800-828-1120
June 8, 1995
RE:
COPN Request No. VA-03085
Chesterfield County Lucy Corr
Nursing Home
Chesterfield County, Virginia
Replacement of Lucy Corr Nursing
Home and Addition of 30 Nursing Kome
Beds
Mr. Jacob W. Mast
Chief Administrative Officer
Lucy Corr Nursing Home
6800 Lucy Corr Court
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832-0170
Dear Mr. Mast:
I am writing in follow-up to our various communications regarding the above-
referenced certificate. This certificate which was extended through January 6, 1995,
has now expired. At the time the initial extension was granted on May 12, 1994, you
i~dicated that the project would be completed as authorized no later than July 1996.
However, as of this date you have not demonstrated that Lucy Corr Nursing Home
("LCAr/~") meets the minimum required progress for twelve months following certificate
issuance, according to the Virginia Medical Care Facilities Certificate of Public Need
Rules and Regulations ("Regulations"). Section 7.4 of the Regulations states that
failure of any project to meet progress requirements stated in Section 7.3 of the
Regulations shall be cause for certificate revocation unless the Commissioner
determines that sufficient justification exists to permit variance.
I am, therefore, requesting that LCATH provid~ documentation to the Department
no later than June 23, 1995, which shows the~-~atus of project financing, the statu~
6~ architectural pl~nnin~ ~nd tn~ proposed timetable for completion inclu-~i-nq a~
~ustification for the delay. I~am.a~lsg requesting that LCNH delineate ~h~
es~imace~ cost of the project and describe the role that't~e local Colum~ff~
~spitals will have in the pr6posed financin~ and opera~o~ ,of LCNH's proposed
re___placemen~ facility.
Based on a review of this information, a determination will be made as to
whether there is sufficient justification to extend the above-referenced certificate
in accordance with the Regulations.
pc:
Sincerely,
endy V. Brg~n, Project Review Manager
Office of R~sources Development
Donald R. Stern , M.D., M.P.H., Acting State Health Commissioner
Paul E. Parker, Director, Office of Resources Development
Karen L. Cameron, Executive Director, Central Virginia Health Planning Agency
Office of Health Facilities Regulation
Meeting Date:
June 14, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Item Number:
Page 1
8.3..
of,
Subject:
Interjurisdictional Agreement
,County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Adopt the attached Interjurisdictional Agreement between Chesterfield County and the
Health Center Commission in lieu of the Agreement adopted by the Board on August 25,
1993, and authorize the County Administrator to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Board.
Summaryoflnformation:
The Board of Supervisors and the Health Center Commission each adopted an earlier
Interjurisdictional Agreement; however, due to uncertainties over funding requirements and
commitments, the Agreement was never formally executed.
On May 31, 1995, the Health Center Commission formally adopted the attached Agreement
and the Board of Supervisors are requested to formally adopt the Agreement today.
The Chairman of the Health Center Commission is present to sign the Agreement on behalf
of the Commission as soon as the Board of Supervisors approves the Agreement.
Preparer:
Attachments:
Rober~ L./Masd-e;
No
Title: Deputy
County Administrator
039
INTER JURISDICTIONAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AND THE
CHESTERFIELD HEALTH CENTER COMMISSION
WHEREAS since 1970, the County of Chesterfield, Virginia ("County") has owned
and operated a nursing home currently named the Lucy Corr Nursing Home (''Nursing
Home"); and
WHEREAS, on January 13, 1993, the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to Chapter 37,
Title 15.1, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, created a Chesterfield County Health Center
Commission ("Commission")for the purpose of operating the Nursing Home; and
WHEREAS, the County has donated 27.5967 acres to the Commission representing
the existing nursing home site and a site for future expansion; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.1-1514, et. seq., the County and the Commission
are empowered to enter into this interjurisdictional agreement providing for the continued
operation of the Nursing Home;
WITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the mutual undertakings of the parties, the County
and the Commission covenant and agree as follows:
1. The Commission will use its best efforts to operate the Nursing Home in a
professional and cost-effective manner providing high quality nursing home care for its
residents. The County and the Commission agree that the Commission and the County are
separate legal and management entities.
040
2. The Commission shall use the 27.5967-acre site donated to the Commission
by the County for the purpose of providing health care services to the citizens of Chesterfield
County and surrounding communities.
3. The County hereby conveys to the Commission and the Commission accepts
the following obligations under the Hill-Burton Act:
The obligation to provide uncompensated services pursuant to 42 C.F.R.
124, Subpart F;
b.
124, Subpart G;
C.
d.
The obligation to provide community services pursuant to 42 C.F.R.
The fight of Federal recovery under 42 C.F.R. 124, Subpart H; and
The obligations assumed by the Commission under a, b and c are subject
to funds being provided to the Commission by the County. Under the obligations as set forth
above, the Commission shall be liable only to the extent of funds provided to the
Commission by the County to fulfill said obligations.
4. The County Administrator will request in his budget annual appropriations to
transfer funds to the Commission under the Hill-Burton Act until such obligation is retired
on February 7, 1996. Appropriations for a fiscal year will be transferred to the Commission
sen-d-annually in July and January of that fiscal year.
5. Both the County and the Commission recognize that the Commission will
operate the Nursing Home as a financially and operationally independent entity except as
reflected by commitments contained in this Agreement.
2
6. Effective July 1, 1993, the County conveys to the Commission and the
Commission accepts in its current condition all rifle and interest in all personal property
located at the Nursing Home which is included in the Nursing Home's fixed asset list as
shown on Nursing Home records.
7. Effective July 1, 1993, the County transfers to the Commission all accounts
receivable or other financial assets identified on County documents as belonging to the
Nursing Home. Effective July 1, 1993, the Commission accepts all encumbrances and
financial obligations identified on County documents as of the date of this Agreement as
belonging to the Nursing Home. Effective July 1, 1993, the County assigns and the
Commission accepts any contractual commitments inuring to the benefit of the Nursing
Home including, but not limited to, contract, lease or procurement obligations.
8. Effective January 1, 1994, all employees identified by the County as working
at the Nursing Home shall, for all purposes, be employees of the Commission. Effective
July 1, 1993, the Commission assumes any County liability arising out of Nursing Home
employees' employment relating to leave, vacation, holidays, unemployment obligations,
grievances, disciplinary proceedings, Title VII obligations or any other financial or legal
obligations arising out of an employment relationship. With regard to expenses for ongoing
liabilities incurred by the County as a result of Worker's Compensation claims while such
individuals worked at the Nursing Home prior to July 1, 1993 and obligations to individuals
for Health Care benefits consistent with County Policy for employees of the Nursing Home
who retired from County service prior to July 1, 1993, the County at its option may request
3
the Health Center Commission to pay such expenses as they are incun'ed. The Health Center
Commission will request reimbursement for such expenditures from the County in their
annual budget request. The County Administrator will request in his annual budget proposal
to the Board of Supervisors reimbursement to the Commission for such expenses as a
separate item unrelated to other reimbursements, subsidy for Hill-Burton obligation or other
subsidy for indigent care. The County further agrees not to use reimbursement for such
expenses as offsets for other subsidy commitments or obligations until such time as the
Commission achieves an unobligated $1,000,000 cash reserve fund.
9. The County agrees to provide to the Commission support services in a manner
mutually determined by the County Administrator and the Health Center Commission on an
invoiced, cost basis.
10. If the Commission desires to receive any County support services beyond June
30, 1996, the Commission shall transmit such request to the County Administrator by
February 1st of each year.
11. The County will provide a capital equity payment to the Commission of $2.5
million as a one-time contribution as needed during construction of the new nursing home
facility. The construction will be in accordance with normal County construction procedures
and the Health Center Commission agrees to use the services of the County Construction
Coordinator on a cost reimbursement basis. Thereatter, the County will not make any further
contributions or debt service payments to the Commission for the existing or new nursing
home facilities.
4
O43
12. Subject to annual appropriations, the County will provide an amount not to
exceed $1.3 million over three consecutive fiscal years, beginning fiscal year 1997,
consistent with the final feasibility study findings for operating costs to operate the new
nursing home. At the end of this period no additional payments will be made by the County
for operating costs.
13. The rights and obligations provided for in this Agreement may only be assigned
or otherwise contractually transferred by the Commission upon the approval of the Board of
Supervisors.
14. The Commission and the County will provide upon request by either any
documents requested by the other in order to administer this Agreement. The Commission
shall report annually to the Board of Supervisors as provided in Section 15.1-1529 of the
Code of Virginia, as amended.
15. This Agreement is dated as of June 14, 1995.
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD,
VIRGINIA
By:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY HEALTH
CENTER COMMISSION
By:
044
Meeting Date:
June 14, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Item Number:
Page 1 of 1
8.B.1.
Subject:
Nominations
Virginia Urban Partnership
County Administrator's Comments:
BoardAction Requested:
Nominate four representatives to the Virginia Urban
Partnership.
Summary of Information:
Chesterfield County is a member of the Urban Partnership, an
organization established by the Virginia Chamber of Commerce
to improve the competitiveness of Virginia's urban areas and
the Commonwealth as a whole. The Partnership is preparing
policy and legislative recommendations for consideration by
the 1996 General Assembly. Through our membership, the
County will have four representatives on the Partnership's
Board, two of which are to be representatives from the
business community. The other two members are to be a
member of the Board of Supervisors and the County
Administrator. The following persons are submitted for
nomination to serve until the completion of the project
(April 30, 1996):
J. L. McHale, III
Lane B. Ramsey ·
Dean M. Flatt (Hill-Phoenix) ~
John Bowen (Chesterfield Business Council)
Preparer: ,,~ ~. ~ ~_--n~- 1 - Title:
Attachments:
Yes V-] No
Executive Assistant to
County
O45
11']eMet~oCt'~'nber
Jul'~a ?, 1995
Ckestertie]d county
C~%est ertie Id, VA Z3U32
De a'r' Lane
'l"}~nk you so much for youz' letter o~ ,It:ne 1, 199b.
Ckeste.rfield Busines~ Council ~s excited aDout th~ oppor~unJny to
particiDate wi%h Chesterfield County i~ the Virginia Cna~er
Com[[~ez'ce's Urban Partnership. We are. honored that you would
allow us to place once of our mc~eru ~ ~he Board of Directors
of t]~at, organization. To that end, I have conferred with RusSy
Miller, who is the ~ncominq chaiz'ma~% of the Bus4ness Council
we wo~]td like Zo recomme~d go you Mr. John Bowen. John, as you
~nnw, {m a Certified Pt~blic Accoun~a~%~ in Chesto~field and has
be~n a ~'~embmw ~ our Board fo~' the last year. He has been very
active in the BusJ n~m~ ~c~nni]. in the pas~ having wor~ed on the
Picnic Committee and subcom~4~'t~ sr. udying the issue of
cooperation with ~he o~her b,.%~m~ count:ils in the area,
John
'/20 Mooref4eld Park Drive
Eiutm.u:~d, VA 23236-3657
2~. East Franklin $1~e'l * P.O. B~,.t 12260 - I~iehmond, V~rgini~ 23241
046
,Io)m w~i] tonka a stron.q additicm to an "zl! -'tar team.
Thank you again for yo,~r- ~:cm.~ideratic, n in th£~ matter.
Ru~ty ~ill~z
John G. Bowen
Miohele R. Whmalar
047
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
June 14, 1995 Item Number:
Page i of 1
8.B.2.
,Subject:
NOMINATIONS/APPOINTMENTS
Boards and Committees with Terms Expiring Through
June 30, 1995
Count}, Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator: ~ ] ~"--"-
BoardAction Requested:
,Summary of Information:
Attached is a list of appointments with terms expiring
through June 30, 1995.
Under the existing Rules of Procedure, appointments to
boards and committees are nominated at one meeting and appointed.
at the subsequent meeting unless Rules are suspended by a
unanimous vote of the Board. Nominees are voted on in the order
in which they are nominated.
See attached.
Preparer:
Theresa M. Pitts
Attachments:
Title: Clerk to Board of Supervisors
Yes V--] No I# 04S
BOARD OF APPEALS FOR VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE
Mr. Robert W. Andrus ~f
~ Rebait J_ L~_ipert~v Jr.
Mr. G. Warren Vaughan 4~
Mr. Andrus and Mr. Vaughan have each expressed a desire to
continue serving. Mr. Leipertz has declined reappointment.
Members represent the County at large. Terms would be effective
July 1, 1995 and expire June 30, 1998. See attached.
CAPITAL AREAAGENCY ON AGING BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Ms. Yvette B. Ridley
Ms. Ridley is ineligible for reappointment.
effective July 1, 1995 and expire June
attachments.
Term would be
30, 1998. See
GREATER RICHMOND PARTNERSHIP BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Honorable Harry G. Daniel
Term would be effective July 1, 1995 and expire June 30, 1996.
See attached.
HEALT~ CENTER COMMISSION
Matoaca District
Mr. Frasier W. Brickhouse
Advisory
Ms. Linda Shaw
Mr. Brickhouse and Ms. Shaw have each expressed a desire to
continue serving, however, staff requests these individuals be
redesignated to represent the County at large. Staff also
requests that Mrs. Vivian Herbert, who currently is an at large
member, be redesignated to represent Matoaca District. (Mrs.
Herbert's term does not expire until June 30, 1998). Terms for
Mr. Brickhouse and Ms. Shaw would be effective July 1, 1995 and
expire June 30, 1999.
INDUSTRIAL DEVRT~)P~[EN~ AUTHORITY
Matoaca District
Mr. Henry L. Moore
Midlothian District
Mr. William F. Seymour, III
Mr. Moore and Mr. Seymour have each expressed a desire to
continue serving. Terms would be effective July 1, 1995 and
expire June 30, 1999.
049
JOHN TYLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE LOCAL BOARD
General William D. Curry, Jr.
General Curry is ineligible for reappointment. Term would be
effective July 1, 1995 and expire June 30, 1999.
See attached.
METROPOLITAN RICHMOND CONVENTION AND VISITOR'S BUREAU
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mr. Raymond P. Szabo
Mr. Richard L. Young
Mr. Szabo and Mr. Young have each expressed a desire to continue
serving. Terms would be effective July 1, 1995 and expire June
30, 1997.
YOB~I{ SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD
Bermuda District
~r. Manuel Hidalgo, Jr., adult representative
Mr. Michael R. Menefee, Jr., representing Thomas Dale High School
Mr. Hidalgo has expressed a desire to continue serving.
Mr. Menefee is ineligible.
In addition, Mr. Rickey Parr,
resigned from the Citizen Board,
exists.
an adult representative, has
therefore, a vacancy currently
Clover Hill District
Mrs. Cheryl Ghorashi, adult representative
Mr. Timothy Norman Showalter, representing Monacan High School
Miss Laura Pinnow, representing Clover Hill High School
Ms. Ghorashi is ineligible for reappointment.
Mr. Showalter has expressed a desire to continue serving.
Miss ~innow is ineligible for reappointment.
Dale District
Mr. Andy Foldenauer, representing Meadowbrook High School
Miss Adeola Oshunkentan, representing L. C. Bird High School
Mr. Foldenauer has declined reappointment.
Miss Oshunkentan is ineligible for reappointment.
050
¥OOT~ SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD (continued)
Matoaca District
Reverend Harold E. Braxton, adult representative
Miss Amy Aleski, representing Manchester High School
Miss Melanie Stewart, representing Matoaca High School
Reverend Braxton has expressed a desire to continue serving.
Miss Aleski and Miss Stewart are each ineligible
reappointment.
Midlothian District
Mrs. Marti Franks, adult representative
Mr. Jeff Ludden, representing James River High School
Miss Jennifer McQuade, representing Midlothian High School
Mrs. Franks has expressed a desire to continue serving.
Mr. Ludden has expressed a desire to continue serving.
Miss McQuade is ineligible for reappointment.
for
See attachments.
Terms for adults would be effective July 1, 1995 and expire June
30, 1998. Terms for students would be effective July 1, 1995 and
expire June 30, 1996.
051
Robert J. Martinko
President
HBA
RICHMOND
HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION of RICHMOND
400 NORTH RIDGE ROAD
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23229
(804) 282-0400
Warren H. Hayden
President-Elect
Sidney L Stern, II
Vice President-Builder
Danny W. Baker
Vice President-Associate
Lloyd M. Poe
Secretary
John S. Pearsall, Jr.
Treasurer
William C. Trimmer, Jr.
Immediate Past President
Susan R. Sprigg
Executive Vice President
Mr. Bill Dupler
Chief Building Official
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, VA 23832
Dear Bill:
June 2, 1995
The Home Builders Association of Richmond appreciates the opportunity t°
submit anew member to serve on the County's Board of Appeals. Mr. Leipertz's
term will expire at the end of the month and he will be unable to renew.
We are pleased to submit Mr. Timothy D. Grider, who works for Mike Dumont
Construction Company. He is responsible for the remodeling division of the
company, and participates with the new homes division as well, giving him a well
rounded construction background, and familiarity with all sections of the building
code. We believe his experience with these many facets of building and
construction will be beneficial to the Board of Appeals.
His home and business information are as follows:
Mike Dumont Construction Co.
11508 Allecingie Pkwy.
Richmond, VA 23235-4302
PH: 804-379-9141
FX: 804-379-5271
Residence:
2700 Walnut Creek Court
Midlothian, VA 23112
(Brandermill - Cloverhill)
HBAR believes that Mr. Grider is an excellent replacement for Mr. Leipertz to
serve on the Board of Appeals, and hopes that you will concur. If you have any
questions or concerns, please feel free to contact Mr. Grider directly, or you can
contact Bambi Bamette at HBAR at 282-0400.
Sincerely,
Robert J.
Home Builders Association of Richmond
05;8
Capital Area Agency on
Aging
May 3, 1995
The Honorable J. L. McHale, III
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
County of Chesterfield
5641Teterling Ct.
Chester, VA 23831
24 F.. Cary Street · Richmond, Virginia 23219-3796 '_.8~00
Dear Mr. McHale:
Yvette Ridley will have served as your appointed representative to the
Capital Area Agency on Aging (CAAA) Board of Directors for two three-year
terms ending June 30, 1995. Mrs. Ridley is not eligible for reappoint-
ment at this time in accordance with CAAA's bylaws. We are most
appreciative of the time and effort Mrs. Ridley has given to Capital Area
Agency on Aging for the last six years serving as Board chairman and in
other leadership positions.
We are requesting that the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors appoint a
county resident to serve on the CAAA Board for a three-year term from
July 1, 1995, to June 30, 1998. We ask that the person appointed have a
concern for our older citizens whether living in their own homes or in
long-term care facilities. We also would llke to have your county
representative keep the Board of Supervisors informed about the services
of Capital Area Agency on Aging and issues concerning the older adults in
Planning District 15.
We are grateful for your attention to this appointment. As always, we
are most appreciative of the continuing support of the Chesterfield
County Board of Supervisors.
Sincerely yours,
Mary C. Payne
Executive Director
Lane Ramsey
County Administrator
MCP/jbs 0445A
Helping Older Persons Remain As Independent As Possible
053
Capital Area Agency on Aging
24 E, Cary Strcel, Richmond, Virgini:~ 232l ¢3796.8(.i4-343-3000
June 7. lgg5
The Honorable J. L. M~Hale. III
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
B§41Teterltug Ct.
I~*t-it" I~rand fax transmittal memo 76-rl Fo~"~,~, i
Co, ~ - '"' ~;¢ , ~" I
l~ept. -J~ho.t~. .. ]."" . -
a~o&ntment to the Ca,p~tal Area Agency on Aging 3oar~. The Board
Chesterfield Bo~rd of Sup~r¥isor$ appoint Robert L. Masden to our
o~£ioe is for thre~ years beginning July let and ending June 30
1998, '
population in the county and concern for their future a~ their
our ~oard and will represent the county well.
Thank you for your consideration of Mr. ~a~den's appointment.
Sincerely yours,
~ary C. ~ayne
Executive
pc: George Wilbur, Chairman
Board of DireCtOrs
HOP/ihs 0445A
O54
..... l.lelphag Older Persons Remain A.s Independent As Possible ........ _
McGLnREWOODS
BAwr .F.&BOOTHE
One James Center
901 East Cary Street
Pdchmond, Virginia 23219-4030
Telephone/TI)D (804)775-1000 · Fax (804) 775-1061
May 10, 1995
The Honorable J. L. McHale, III
Chairman
Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
Re: Greater Richmond Partnership - Board of Directors
Dear Mr. Chairman:
I am writin9 to you as General Counsel to Greater Richmond
Partnership.
The By-Laws of Greater Richmond Partnership, copy attached,
provide that the initial Board of Directors shall serve through
June 30, 1995 or until their successors are duly appointed.
We respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors
reappoint Mr. Daniel or appoint one of its other members to serve
as a member of the Board of Directors of Greater Richmond
Partnership for a one-year term beginning July 1. The
Partnership's next Board meetin9 is scheduled for July 20.
I know that I speak on behalf of the Partnership in
expressing its appreciation for the support which the County of
Chesterfield has given to this wonderful public-private economic
development initiative.
If you have any questions, I am confident that Steve Micas
or I will be delighted to try to answer them.
With best regards, I am
WGB/bsm
Enclosure
Very truly
William G. Broaddus
cc:
The Honorable Harry G. Daniel
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
Steven L. Micas, Esquire
Mr. Gregory H. Wingfield
ALEXANDRIA · BALTIMORE · BRUSSELS - CHARLOTTESVILLE · JAC£SONVILLE · NORFOLK · RICHMOND · TYSON$ CORNER · WASHINGTON, DC · ZORICH
EXCERPT OF BY-LAWS OF
GREATER RICHMOND PARTNERSHIP, INC.
ARTICLE IV
DIRECTORS
4.1 The initial Board-of Directors to the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation
shall serve through June 30, 1995, or until theft- successors are duly appo/nted. Thereafter,
the goverrdng bodies of. the Counties of Chesterfield, Hanover, Hermico and the City of
Richmond shall each appo/nt one of their elected representatives to serve as a member of
Ihe Board of Directors, for a one-year term. Likew/se, effective July 1, 1995, the Me~ro
0800:7050.7 -1-
056
'Chamber shall appoint four representatives of its member organ/zations to serve on the
Board of Directors for a one-year term. Directors shall be eligible for reappointment. The
Directors shall ser~e without compensation; however, reasonable and appropriate expenses
incurred in the conduct of the Corporation's bus/ness may be reimbursed. The Metro
Chamber shall appoint one (1) additional representative to the Board of Directors for each
additional un/t of local government that becomes a Member of the Corporationl Directors
shall cease to ser~e at the end of their terms, unless earlier removed by their appo/nting
Member, and in the case of an elected official, if he or she ceases to be an elected official.
The approphate Member shall appoint a qualified replacement to fill the unexpired term
of any Director. At any time that there are less than four local government Members
elig/ble to participate in the affairs of the Corporation pursuant to Article XII of the Bylaws,
the number of Metro Chamber directors entitled to vote shall be reduced to the number of
local government directors eligible to vote.
4.2 The Board of Directors shall be the governing body of the Corporation and
shall have full power and authority to conduct the business of the Corporation.
4.3 At/ts initial meeting and at each subsequent armu'al meeting, the Board of
Directors shall elect a Chairman, Vice-Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, a
Secretary and such additional officers as it deems necessary or desirable.
0800:7050.7
-2-
057
March 22, 1995
Mr. Lane B. Ramsey
County Administrator
Chesterfield County
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia
23832
~n June 30, 1995, the s~e~ond term of General William D. Curry, Jr., to the John
~llege Board expires. Since this is his second term, he is not
eligible for reappointment. I would appreciate your assistance in working with
the Board of Supervisors to appoint a new representative to our Board to date
from July 1, 1995.
Please know that General Curry was an outstanding Board member. His broad
experiences enabled him to offer sound and constructive advice on a variety of
matters. His congeniality made him quite popular with his fellow Board
members and his record of attendance and participation was exemplary. In
addition, he was always cognizant of his responsibility to Chesterfield County.
He will be hard to replace. I will personally miss his collegiality, common
sense, and perspective.
Thank you for your assistance. If you need additional information about the
appointment, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Marshall W. Smith
President
MWS: gw
XC.'
Ms. Linda Hyslop, Chairman, JTCC Board
General William Curry
Office of the President
John Tyler Community College
Chester, Virginia 23831
804.796 4021
fax 804.796 4163
800.552 3490
TDD 804.796 4197
058
Chesterfield County
9f .
Youth Servzces Czt zen Board
P.O. BOX 4O '
CHESTERFIELD, VA 23832
(8O4) 796-7100
MEMORANDUM
TO:
The Honorable Jack McHale, Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Members of the Board of Supervisors
THROUGH: Robert L. Masden, Deputy County Administrator, Human Services
FROM: Barbara L. Bennett, Coordinator, Youth Services /~:Ld, c~x~ d.
DATE: June 7, 1995
SUBJECT: YOUTH SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD
MEMBERSHIP 1995/1996
Terms of appointment for 13 members of the Youth Services Citizen Board expire June 30,
1995. After canvassing the community, Youth Services has developed the following list of
interested candidates to fill the upcoming Board openings for your consideration:
1 ADULT - New 3 year term appointments
Clover Hill District
Pam Masters, 13910 McTyres Cove Lane, Midlothian, Virginia
23112
1 ADULT - New appointment to complete unexpired term of two years
Bermuda District - Not yet finalized.
7 YOUTH - New 1 year term appointments
*Matoaca District - Manchester High School
Erin Henretta, 3802 Paulhill Road, Richmond, Virginia 23236
*Dale District - Meadowbrook High School
Jennifer Keavy, 4918 Brickhaven Drive, Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
*Clover Hill District, Clover Hill High School
Reza Mobrem, 5221 Clipper Cove Road, Midlothian, Virginia 23112
*Dale District, L.C. Bird High School
Adrian Marie Pearce, 7418 Amsden Drive, Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
*Matoaca District, Matoaca High School
Shauna L. Robertson, 10405 River Road, Petersburg, Virginia 23803
O59
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service.
*Midlothian District, Midlothian High School
Ellen Shultz, 1202 Cottage Mill Circle, Midlothian, Virginia 23113,
*Bermuda District - Thomas Dale High School
Buck T. Walker, 3706 Dogwood Avenue, Chester, Virginia 23831
The following Youth Services Citizen Board Members terms are scheduled to expire June 30,
1995, and are seeking reappointment:
3 ADULTS - Reappointment for 3 year terms
Matoaca District
Reverend Harold Braxton, 21030 Penmar Drive, Matoaca, Virginia
23803 *
Midlothian District
Marti Franks, 2121 Leovey Lane, Midlothian, Virginia 23113.
Bermuda District
Manuel Hidalgo, Jr., 13006 Buckland Road, Chester, Virginia 23831
2 YOUTH - Reappointment for 1 year term
*Midlothian District - James River High School
Jeff Ludden, 2102 Planters Row Drive, Midlothian, Virginia 23113
*Clover Hill District - Monacan High School
Timothy Norman Showalter, 329 Saybrook Drive, Richmond, Virginia 23236*
I can be reached at 796-7100 to discuss your thoughts regarding the appointments and
reappointments to the Youth Services Citizen Board. Please let me know if you wish to
orient any other prospective appointees to the activities of this Board and the responsibilities
of Board Members.
*Please note that for all youth listed, the magisterial district depicts the location of high
school, and not residence.
*Application attached.
06O
YOUTIt SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
HOME ADDRESS: ~2
HOME TELEPHONE:
Mill Circle ~ic~lo~mra~,
COUNTY DISTRICT:
WORK ADDRESS:
M t'oLIof-ht'c~
WORK TELEPHONE:
YOUTH: CURRENT GRADE It SCHOOL
DATE 0F BIRTH ~/~ ] '"~
ac~-J vi+es i~
What special interests and qualifications would you like the Board of Supervisors to know about you in considering
your nomination for appointment?
~ h~ve o~ i,~t~I- ,'~ o3sur,',~3 s~f~ ~mcl
wh,'ch m,.~ Feery a~d '--~ den ~arf/ci~Fe.
~ou~-t-h z~o J-h~.t ~rheu cio no~ become p~bi~~ h~ve:~
~o you nave ~y specmi projec[s or goam wmcn yo~voum
wo~ld ~tso li~e ~ 3e~ ~ soluHo~s be Carrie~
Do you understand the need to atmnd mon~ly meetings, and are you able to devote time to ~e work o£~e Bo~d?
i r~vo Iv ed
SIGNED: ~'- ~
(Applic~t,)
DATE:
I endorse ~ \~. elk
Youth Services Board.
For Youth Applicants:
Please have your parents and your guidance counselor read and sign this application:
~u ~ 2._ 's application to be appointed to serve one year on the Chesterfield County
NAME:
NAME(S): C~. )
(l~en~[~))
DATE: (_o- ~ -q ~' DATE:
June 5, 1995
The Honorable Freddie Nicholas
Matoaca District Supervisor
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
RE: APPOINTMENT TO YOUTH SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD
Dear Dr. Nicholas:
I am writing to request reappointment to the Youth Services Citizen Board as a representative
of the Matoaca District. The term for which I am seeking reappointment will commence on
July 1, 1995.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
axton
Chairman
Youth Services Citizen Board
21030 Penmar Drive
Matoaca, Virginia 23803
June 5, 1995
The Honorable Edward Barber
Midlothian District Supervisor
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
RE: APPOINTMENT TO YOUTH SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD
Dear ~
I am writing to request reappointment to the Youth Services Citizen Board as a representative
of the Midlothian District. The term for which I am seeking reappointment will commence
on July 1, 1995.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Marti Franks
2121 Leovey Lane
Midlothian, Virginia 23113
June 5, 1995
The Honorable Jack McHale
Bermuda District Supervisor
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
RE: APPOINTMENT TO YOUTH SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD
Dear Mr. McHale:
I am writing to request reappointment to the Youth Services Citizen Board as a representative
of the Bermuda District. The term for which I am seeking reappointment will commence on
July 1, 1995.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Hidal~, Jr.
13006 Buckynd Road
Chester, Virginia 23831
O64
June 5, 1995
The Honorable Art Warren
Clover Hill District Supervisor
P.O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
RE: APPOINTMENT TO YOUTH SERVICES CITIZEN BOARD
Dear Mr. Warren:
I am writing to request reappointment to the Youth Services Citizen Board as a youth
representative of Monacan High School in the Clover Hill District. The term for which I am
seeking reappointment will commence on July 1, 1995.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Timothy Showalter
329 Saybrook Drive
Richmond, Virginia 23236
Meeting Date:
June
"CHESTERFIELD COUNT~~'
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
14, 1995 AGENDA
Item Number:
Page ._~..1 of.~l
8.C.l.a.
Subject:
Resolution Honoring Jean T. Smith, Director - Social Services Upon Her Retirement.
County' Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Adopt the attached resolution for presentation on June 27, 1995, at a retirement dinner
honoring Miss Smith.
S u mmary of Informafio n:
A resolution honoring Jean T. Smith, Director of Social Services for her 39 years of
dedicated service. Miss Smith will be retiring on July 1, 1995.
Preparer: Rob~&t L. Masden
Attachments: Yes No
Title:
Deputy County Administrator
066
RESOLUTION HONORING
JEAN T. SMITH
WHEREAS, Jean T. Smith has served the citizens of Chesterfield
County and the Commonwealth of Virginia for 39 years through her
dedicated service with the Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Department
of Social Services; and
WHEREAS, Jean T. Smith served the Department in capacities
from social worker to director; and espoused and demonstrated
throughout her work that she is a servant of the community; and
WHEREAS, Jean T. Smith spearheaded cooperative efforts with
County agencies to support new and innovative programs and has been
actively involved in furthering metropolitan and regional efforts;
and exhibited in countless ways a community vision for services;
and
WHEREAS, Jean T. Smith has a strong commitment to serving
children and families and was instrumental in developing the first
community-based Multi-discipline Child Abuse Team; and
WHEREAS, Jean T. Smith has set no higher work standard than
the one she has set for herself; and exhibited the best of
professional qualities; maintained a powerful sense of humor; and
was open and accessible to staff and customers;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield Board of
Supervisors hereby expresses its gratitude and deep appreciation to
Jean T. Smith for her outstanding service and leadership to the
citizens of Chesterfield County and staff of the Department of
Social Services, and further expresses best wishes as she retires
from service July 1, 1995.
,
'- CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
.; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of_2_
AGENDA
Meeting Date: June 14, 1995 ltemNumber: 8.C. 1.b.
Subject:
Implementation of the Comprehensive Community Corrections Act (CCCA) and
the Pretrial Services Act (PSA); establishment of the Chesterfield
County - Colonial Heights Community Criminal Justice Board; and
provision for joint exercise of p°wers.
CountyAdministrator'sComments:
BoardAction Requested:
Approve a Resolution
Summary of Information:
The Virginia General Assembly adopted two acts entitled the
Comprehensive Community Corrections Act (CCCA) and Pretrial Services Act
(PSA) . Both of these acts are effective July 1, 1995.
The Comprehensive Community Corrections Act is a revision to the
Community Diversion Incentive Act (CDI) which was passed in 1981. The
CDI Program has served Chesterfield and Colonial Heights since 1981.
Responsibility to implement this legislation is shifted from the
Department of Corrections (DOC) to the Department of Criminal Justice
Services (DCJS). The Community Corrections Resources Board will be
replaced by a Policy/Advisory Board called the Community Criminal
Justice Board (CCJB). This new Board will consist of criminal justice
professionals and have citizen representation. This new Board will also
oversee the Pretrial Services Act. A list of members is outlined in the
resolution.
The responsibility for development and implementation of programs and
services has been shifted from the state to localities. Localities are
only required to establish a Community Correction Program to the extent
funded by the Commonwealth. Localities will be allowed to develop an
array of intermediate sanctions for punishment of non-violent offenders
Preparer:
Glen R. Peterson
Attachments:
~-] Yes
Title: C.D.I Program Director
No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page _2_ of_~_
Summary of Information: (Continued~
and may include community service, public inebriate diversion, home
incarceration, electronic monitoring, offender supervision, substance
abuse assessment, testing and treatment, according to the localities
needs. The code also allows for additional programs, facilities and
services such as jail farms, pre-release facilities and work release
facilities.
The Pretrial Services A~t is new, although Chesterfield has had a
Pretrial Release Program since 1988 which was a pilot site through the
Commonwealth Attorney's Office. Pretrial Release enhances public safety
by providing information to judges to allow more informed bonding
decisions and provides supervision and drug/alcohol testing as a
Pretrial Release condition. In 1993 the Pretrial Program was expanded
to Colonial Heights, part of the Twelfth Judicial District.
The Code of Virginia requires that localities applying for jail
construction cost ~reimbursement by the State submit a community-based
correction plan and to establish community corrections programs and
pretrial services programs.
It is recommended the CCCA and PSA be implemented as a multi-
jurisdictional program to cover the Twelfth Judicial District and
Circuit Courts. Colonial Heights is reviewing a similar resolution June
13, 1995.
# 069
JOIN~'~RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR T~'~ IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
COM,. ,:HENSlVE COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ~CT (CCCA) AND THE PRETRIAL
SERVICES ACT (PSA); ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY AND CITY
OF COLONIAL HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE BOARD; AND PROVISION
FOR JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS.
WHEREAS, the Virginia General Assembly has adopted legislation entitled the
Comprehensive Community Corrections Act for Local Responsible Offenders (Sections
53.1-180 et. $~q. of the Code of Virginia) and the Pretrial Services Act (Sections
19.2-152.2 et. ~eq. of the Code of Virginia), both of which are effective July 1,
1995; and
WHEREAS, 53.1-82.1 of the Code of Virginia requires that Chesterfield County
submit a Community Based Corrections Plan to the Department of Corrections in order
to receive reimbursement for eligible costs of jail construction; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Community Corrections Act and the Pretrial
Services Act both mandate that any locality required to submit a Community Based
Corrections Plan is therefore further required to establish Community Corrections
Programs and Pretrial Services Programs; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County and City of Colonial Heights Community
Diversion Incentive Program has served the County of Chesterfield and the City of
Colonial Heights since 1981, and provided the judicial system with sentencing
alternatives for certain misdemeanants and persons convicted of non-violent felonies;
and
WHEREAS, Sections 53.1-183 and 19.2-152.5 of the Code of Virginia require
that each county and city participating in Community Corrections Programs and
Pretrial Services Programs establish a Community Criminal Justice Board; and, in the
case of multi-jurisdictional efforts, that each jurisdiction mutually agree upon the
appointments to said board: and
WHEREAS, the establishment of a multi-jurisdictional Chesterfield County and
City of Colonial Heights Community Criminal Justice Board will result in a reduction
in administrative costs to each locality, an increase in funding priorities and available
grant dollars, promote efficiency in offender supervision and provide for a
comprehensive regional offender database.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Chesterfield and the
City of Colonial Heights, implement the Comprehensive Community Corrections Act
for Local Responsible Offenders and the Pretrial Services Act, and that the existing
Chesterfield County Community Diversion Services be responsible for said
implementation and be renamed Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Community Corrections
Services; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chesterfield/Colonial
Heights Community Criminal Justice Board be established and that the following
individuals be hereby appointed to said Board pursuant to Section 53.1-183 of the
Code of Virginia:
The Chief Judge of the 12th Judicial Circuit Court, or another Circuit Court
Judge designated by the Chief Judge
The Chief Judge of the 12th Judicial General District Court, or another General
District Court Judge designated by the Chief Judge
The Chief Judge of the 12th Judicial Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court,
or another Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court Judge designated by the
Chief Judge
The Commonwealth Attorney for the County of Chesterfield
The Commonwealth Attorney for the City of Colonial Heights
The Sheriffs for the County of Chesterfield and City of Colonial Heights
07O
,,T, he Chief Magistrate for the County of Ch"~.rfield and City of Colonial Heights
.~e Chief of Police for the City of Coloni,.. Heights
'An Attorney who is experienced in the defense of criminal matters
A Deputy County Administrator designated by the Chesterfield County
Administrator
A city employee designated by the Colonial Heights City Manager
A representative of local education
A representative of the Community Services Boards
Two citizens to be appointed at the discretion of the Chesterfield County Board
of Supervisors
Two citizens to be appointed at the discretion of the Colonial Heights City
Council
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this action provide for a
joint exercise of powers which will serve as documentation of e regional program
service agreement between the County of Chesterfield and the City of Colonial
Heights; and that Chesterfield County shall act as the administrative and fiscal agent
for Chesterfield/Colonial Heights Community Corrections Services.
Adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield
County, Virginia, held
Chairman
Clerk
071
CIIESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUI'EI/VISORS
AGENDA
g-c.-me---t4T--t99-5 I tern N umber:
Page ~,1 .,of__!
8.C.2.
Subject:
School Board Year-End Appropriation Revisions
,,County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardActiou Requested:
The School Board requests the Board of Supervisors approve the attached
resolution to transfer $216,400 from Instruction to Administration &
Attendance/Health, transfer $100,000 from Operations & Maintenance to Pupil
Transportation; approve the early repayment of $280,964 to the CIP Reserve;
and, increase the Storeroom & Warehouse Internal Service Fund by $125 000
Summar~ oflnforma(ion: , ·
School Operatinq Fund
The Board of Supervisors apprOved the School Board third quarter budget
revisions on May 24, 1995. There are several additional changes needed in
the School Operating Fund budget for year-end adjustments.
Southern Health Surcharq~
An agreement between Prucare and Southern Health care providers results in
reimbursement to Chesterfield County Public Schools (CCPS) for a surcharge
billed to CCPS each month by Southern Health. The FY1995 surcharge is
estimated at $216,400 and needs to be appropriated at this time in the
Administration/Attendance and Health appropriation category. The funds for
this transfer are available in the Instruction appropriation category.
J['l'e()al'el':
,,L
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
Superintendent
O72
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page :
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Central Garaga
The total budget for central garage charges from the County was $2,518,300.
These funds are budgeted primarily in the categories of Transportation and
Operations & Maintenance. Pupil Transportation expenditures will exceed
budget by approximately $100,000, while the Operations & Maintenance
expenditures will be under budget by a like amount. This transfer request
to reduce Operations and Maintenance and increase Pupil Transportation is
intended to correct the allocations between appropriation categories.
Also, because of the utility savings realized by Operations & Maintenance,
the School Board is requesting that the loan received for trailer purchases
in the amount of $280,964 be repaid earlier than the original due date of
July 1, 1995. This request is being made so that the School CIP Reserve
funds can be used for the new Carver Middle School project. (Request for
this will be made June 28, 1995.)
Storeroom and Warehouse ODerations Internal Service Fund
The internal service fund for storeroom and warehouse operations will
require, at this budget review, an increase in appropriation of $125,000.
Sales have been greater throughout the year than expected.
VIRGINIA: At a regular meeting
of the Chesterfield County
School Board held Tuesday
evening, May 23, 1995, at
seven-thirty o'clock in the
County meeting room at the
Chesterfield County Courthouse
Complex
PRESENT:
Marshall W. Trammell, Jr., Chairman
Harry A. Johnson, Ed.D., Vice-Chairman
Elizabeth B. Davis
Dianne E. Pettitt
James R. Schroeder, D.D.S.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors approved the transfer of $280,964,
on July 27, 1994, from the School CIP Reserve to the School CIP
fund for the purchase of trailers during FY1995 with the
requirement that the funds be returned to the School CIP Reserve on
July 1, 1995, from the School Operating budget; and, WHEREAS
surplus funds are available in the current fiscal year in the
Operations & Maintenance appropriation category due to the electric
service rebate received; and, WHEREAS, the School Board has
accelerated the new Carver Middle School project per discussions
between the Board of Supervisors and the School Board; NOW
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, on motion of Mrs. Davis, seconded by Dr.
Schroeder, the School Board does hereby requests the Board of
Supervisors to (a) revise appropriations in the School Operating
Fund as indicated below:
Instruction appropriation
Administration/Attendance & Health
Pupil Transportation
Operations & Maintenance
Total School Operating Fund Revisions
$(216,400)
216,400
100,000
(380,964)
$(280,964)
and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of the above, the
School Board further requests the Board of Supervisors approve the
transfer of $280,964 from the School CIP Reserve to the School CIP
Fund for the new Carver Middle School project; and, (2) increase
appropriations in the Storeroom and Warehouse Operations Internal
Service Fund by $125,000, due to increased sales in this operation.
Pat Bartlam, School Board Clerk
T~ Fu~l'gh~~~ ~~t endent
a copy teste
074
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: June 14, 1995 ltemNumber:
Subject:
Brandermill Teen Center Program
Page 1 of =
8.C.3.a.
County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Approve the Transfer of $1,500 in Clover Hill Three Cent Road
Funds to the Parks and Recreation Department to help cover
departmental operating costs relating to the Teen Center Program
Summary of Information:
Parks and Recreation has agreed to assist the Brandermill
Community Association to create a "Teen Center" program for the
Clover Hill area teens. The purpose of this program is to
provide appropriate recreational and social activities for teens
during the summer months. The program will present activities
on Monday through Thursday from 1:00 - 5:00 p.m. and Friday and
Saturday nights from 6:30 - 10:30 p.m. Teen councils have been
formed to formalize the Monday through Thursday activities;
dances and socials will be held on Friday and Saturday nights.
These functions will be open to all Chesterfield County
teenagers.
Parks and Recreation will need additional funding to provide its
services for this program. These expenditures will consist of
salaries, school rental fees, and other operating costs. The
Brandermill Community Association is expected to provide the
majority of funding. However the County has been asked to cover
$1,500 in expenses. Mr. Warren has requested that $1,500 be
transferred from the Clover Hill Three Cent Road Account to
assist this summer teen program.
.//
Preparer:/~ ~/~~~¢~_ Title:
,~a me s./~. St~maier '
Attachments:
~--~ Yes
No
Director, Budget & Management
075
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page
2 of 2
Summary of Information: (Continued)
Funding is available in the Clover Hill Three Cent Road Account
for transfer. Use of $1,500 to transfer to the Parks and
Recreation Department to help offset the operating costs
associated with this new program will leave an available balance
of approximately $26,582.
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
June 14, 1995 AGENDA
Item Number:
Page .1 of__
8.C.3.b.
Subject:
Transfer of Funds from Jacobs Road Elementary Field Improvements Account to the Iron
Bridge Park Account.
.County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator: ~ C ~
.BoardAction Requested:
Harry G. Daniel, Dale District Supervisor, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve
the transfer of $4,175 from the Jacobs Road Elementary Field Improvements Account to the
Iron Bridge Project Account.
.Summaryoflnformation:
As a result of negotiations with a property owner adjacent to Iron Bridge Park, additional
fimds are needed for surveying, fire search and deed preparation to facilitate an acre for acre
trade of property. Staff is of the opinion that the property swap will benefit Chesterfield
County and will insure a spirit of cooperation between the County and its citizens.
_Budget and Management' Comments:
Dale streetlight funds, ;in the amount of $4,175, are
Jacobs Road Elementary Field Improvements project to
sUrveying, title search, and'other costs associated
swap for Iron Bridge Park.
[~es. J¥ ~.~tegmaie~,,-DirectOr
]~U~get & Management
available in the
transfer to cover
with the property
Preparer: ~O.b~ L, ~o~)(~en Title: Deputy
Robert L. Masden
Attachments:
[~Yes
No
County Administrator
"# 077
Meeting Date:
June 14, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Item Number:
Page ~ of- 2
8.C.4,
,Subject:
Appropriate Funds for Chesterfield Health Department's Cardiovascular Risk Reduction
Program.
,County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Appropriate $40,000 to the Chesterfield County Health Department from the Virginia
Department of Health for a Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Program.
.Summary of Information:
In FY 1995, three part-time positions (2 public health nurses and 1 office services assistant)
that were funded by this grant were eliminated under the State work force reduction. The
program provides education, screenings and follow-up for Chesterfield County employees
and residents for high blood pressure and elevated cholesterol level. In 1994, the staff
screened 2,105 individuals for high bl.ood pressure and 862 people for high cholesterol level.
In addition, the staff also administers a Smoking Cessation Program for County employees
and citizens.
- XRo~ert- ~; Masd~n '-~
Attachments: ~ Yes No
Title: Deputy County Administrator
078
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page
· of ~
Summary of Information: (Continued)
~udqet and Manaqement Comments:
The attached item will appropriate $40,000 of federal funds passed
through by the Virginia Department of Health for the continuation
of the Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Program. No county match is
required.
This action is being requested because three part-time positions (2
public health nurses and 1 office services assistant) were
eliminated under the state work force reduction program although
federal funding is still available for the program.
This action would allow the dollars for the part-time positions
eliminated by the state to be passed through to the county and the
county Would then pay for the services of these part-time
positions.
This Board action will appropriate $40,000 for use in the
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Program. As with other grant funded
positions, the Health Department understands that if funding for
these positions is eliminated at the federal level, then the Board
will re-examine the need for the continuation of this service
delivery.
/3 s Jc~- Stegma~r, Di~ecto~
~udget and Management
079
Meeting Date:
' CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
June 14:, 1995 Item Number:
Page 1 of 2
8.C.5.
Subject:
Appropriation of funds and approval of contract amendment number eight
(8) to the engineering agreement between the County of Chesterfield and
Delta Airport Consultants, Inc.
Count~ Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAcfion Requested:
1) Appropriation of funds and approval of contract amendment number
eight (8) associated with Federal AIP project 3-51-0007-09.
Summar~ of Information:
AIP project 3-51-0007-09, in excess of $1.2 million, funded fee simple
and easement property acquisition, obstruction towers and lighting, and
the airport perimeter fence and security gate projects. Due to
unforeseen increases in the scope of construction of the perimeter
fence, and contractor time extensions additional engineering services
were required. This item requests Board approval to appropriate funding
for contract amendment number eight (8) as follows:
Federal
State
Total Appropriation
Local Match
Total Projects
$ 14,265.00
$ 793.00
$ 15,058.00
$ 793.00
$ 15,851.00
The total appropriation needed is $15,851 consisting of FAA funds
($14,265) State funds ($793) and County funds $793).
Attachments:
Yes [-~ No
Title:
Director for Aviation Services
OSO
CHESTERFIELD COUNT x'
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 2 of 2
- AGENDA
Summary of In~rmation: (Continued)
Both the Federal Aviation Administration, and Virginia Department of
Aviation have reviewed contract amendment number eight (8) and approved
these amounts as indication on the attached correspondence.
Local match for this amendment is available in the Airport Capital
Projects Fund which currently has a balance of approximately $65,400.
# 081
KENNETH E W1EGAND
Director
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Department of Aviation
5702 Gulfstream Road
Sandston, Virginia 23150
V/TDD - (804) 236-.3624
FAX - (804) 236-3635
June 1, 1995
Mr. John R. Lillard, Manager
Chesterfield County Airport
7511 Airfield Drive
Richmond, Virginia 23237
Re: Chesterfield County Airport --Amendment No.
AIP 3-51-0007-09
Dear Mr. Lillard:
Our office has reviewed Amendment Number Eight dated March
23, 1995, to the base Engineering Agreement dated May 26, 1992,
transmitted with your letter dated May 17, 1995 and it appears to
be satisfactory.
Please continue to keep this DePartment informed of any
developments pertaining to this project. If you have any
questions, please contact our office.
VWC, Jr. Ivwcj r
Sincerely,
Airport Engiffeer
Plans, Programs & Services
US. Department
of Transp(xtation
r-tKleral Avi~lion
Administration
~ASHINGTONAIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE
101 West Broad Street, Suite 300
Falls Church, Virginia 22046
Telephone: 703/285-2306
May 19, 1995
Mr. John Lillard, Director
Aviation Services
Chesterfield County Airport
7511 Airfield Drive
Richmond, Virginia 23237
Reference: Chesterfield County ALrport
AIP 3-51-0007-09
Install Perimeter Fence
Dear Mr. Lillard:
We have reviewed the proposed ~mendment number 8 to the Engineering
Agreement betw~enChesterfield County andDeltaAirport Consultants,
dated March 23, 1995. The proposed m0dification for $15,851.00 is
considered satisfactory.
Inc. ,
This approval is subject to the limitations of the Grant Agreement, and
does not change the grant amount. Any additional changes in the scope or
services affecting the engineering costs should be coordinated with this
office.
Please su~mit a copy of the ~ecuted amendment for our files.
contact me if you have questions or rec~,~re assistance.
Sincerely,
cmas A. Priscilla, Jr. ~/'
Please
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ! of ~
Meeting Date: June 14, 1995
Item Number: 8. c. 6. a.
Subject: Set date for public hearing to consider an Ordinance to
establish the "Lyndale Drive Special Tax or Assessment Water
District"
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
~-_.
Set July 26, 1995 as date of public hearing to consider an Ordinance to
establish the "Lyndale Drive Special Tax or Assessment Water District"
Summary_ of Information:
In March of this year the Utilities Department was contacted by Mr. and
Mrs. Forest Byrd of 8816 Lyndale Drive who were interested in connecting
to the County's water system. Since that time, the Byrds and two
adjacent property owners have agreed to the establishment of an
assessment district to fund the cost of the necessary water line
extension. This assessment district would be located within the Lyndale
Subdivision, in the Clover Hill Magisterial District.
A map of the proposed assessment district and a list of the impacted
property owners is attached. The total cost of the project is estimated
to be $10,560.00, and each of the three property owners would pay an
assessment of $3,520.00. Payment of the assessment would be due upon
completion of the project, or the property owners may opt to pay the
assessment in semi-annual installments of principal and interest over
the ten-year period. The interest rate would be based upon the current
treasury bill rate at the time the assessment district is established.
Preparer: ~ · Title:
Assistant Director
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
084
Lyndale Drive Special Tax or Assessment Water District
Mr. and Mrs. Forest E. Byrd
Mr. and Mrs. John C. Picchi
Mrs. Kathleen H. Taylor
8816 Lyndale Drive
8825 Lyndale Drive
8832 Lyndale Drive
LYNDALE DRIVE
SPECIAL TAX OR ASSESSMENT
WATER DISTRICT
37~0
8701
37~0
36U
370~
8818
~003
8834
8827
8815
9009
3710
372O
~844
LYNI~LE: DR
PROPOSED
L~.GEND
ASb"ES~HENT DISTRICT
BOUNDARY
PROPOSED WAT~
EXISTINO WATER
0 250' 500'
COU~ OF
DEPAR'f]~I~ OF ~
WATER
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 2
Meetin~ Date: aune 14, 1995
Item Number: 3. c. 6. b.
Subiect:
Request to Set a Public Hearing Date to Amend the FY95 through
FY00 SecondaIy Road Six-Yeai Improvement Plan and Consider the
Proposed FY96 Secondary Road Improvement Budget
County Administrator's Comments:
County, Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
VDOT has ~equested the Board of Supervisors to set June 28, 1995, as a
public hearing date to consider an amendment to the FY95 through FY00
Secondary Road Six-Year Improvement Plan to include a Congestion
Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) project at Turner Road/Walmsley Boulevard
intersection and a Surface TIansportation Program (STP) project to improve
the Woods Edge Road/CSX Railroad Crossing. A hearing is also requested to
consider the adoption of VDOT's proposed FY96 Secondary Road Improvement
Budget.
Summary of information:
BACKGROUND:
Six Year Plan Amendments:
The County ~equested VDOT to provide funding for a new Congestion
Mitigation/Ai~ Quality (CMAQ) project at the Turne~ Road/Walmsley Boulevard
inteIsection. The project will provide improved turn lanes and
signalization at the intersection. The County also requested VDOT to
(Continued on next page)
Preparer: ~]~' ~//~
R~J. McCracken
Attachments:
Yes
Title: Director of Transportation
No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 2 of 2
Summary of Information: (Continued)
improve the CSX railroad crossing at Woods Edge Road using Surface
Transportation Program (STP) funds. The projects must be included in the
Secondary Road Six Year Improvement Plan in order to receive funding.
Addition of the two projects will not affect the construction of the other
projects already included in the plan.
FY96 Secondary Road Improvement Budget:
VDOT is in the process of preparing the FY96 improvement budget. The
budget is basically the implementation of the second year of the Six Year
Improvement Plan previously adopted by the Board. We expect to receive the
proposed budget from VDOT within a few days and will provide a summary to
the Board prior to the public hearing.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board set June 28, 1995, as
the public hearing date to consider an amendment to the Six Year
Improvement Plan and adoption of the FY96 Improvement Budget.
DISTRICT: Countywide
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
June 14, 1995 Item Number:
Page 1 of,,1
8.0.7.
Subject:
Request for Bingo/Raffle Permits
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Approval of Bingo/Raffle Permits
Summary of Information:
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the following applications for bingo/raffle perrcdt
and has determined that the applications meet all statutory requirements:
Organization :Ty~e
Ecoff Elementary PTA
Raffle
December 2
Ecoff Elem. School
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Raffle
June 17
1021 Koger Center Blvd.
Year
1995
1995
Steven L. Micas
Attachments:
Yes
No
Title: County Attorney
1205:389.48
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Application for a Permit to Conduct
Bingo Games or Raffles
In support of this application, the applicant offers the following information under oath:
Offi¢ia nameo£or a-'z ,tion: EO.._o,Cr''i
2,.
Address of~organizatio.n's headquarters (olease include street address, city and zip code):
Address where all records of receipts and disbursements are permanently filed:
4. Names and address of owner of the property described in 3 above: ~::l,,g~ ~ .
Address(es) where bingo games will be held or raffle drawings conducted (please include street address, city and
zip code: .~Dt:t. ryh ~.
NOTE: THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY AT THE LOCATION DESCRIBED IN 5 ABOVE.
Dates or days of wee~k and time when bingo games or raffles will be held at the above address(es):
¥o-ri $ e..
Date when organiTation was founded: ]t~ ~t~
Has your organi?ation been in existence and met regularly in Chesterfield Coun/ty or an adjacent county, city or
town for five (5) years immediately prior to making this application? Yes V' . No
Is your organization currently and has your organization always been operated in the past as a non-profit
organization? Yes V'" No __ If not, explain
10.
11.
Tax exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code (if applicable):
State the specific type and purpose of your organization: ~A ~[/'
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Type of permit applied for: Bingo Games Raffles V/ Both
Application is for a new or renewal l~ permit. I~,renewing a permit,
on time and in compliance with all applicable le'~ }equirements. Yes ~7/ . No
were financial reports filed
List below gross receipts, if any, from all sources related to the operation of bingo games or instant bingo by
calendar quarter for the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of this application: ¢
1st qtr: $ 2nd qtr: $ 3rd qtr: $ 4th qtr: $
Officers of OrganiTation:
Name
Address Bus. Phone Home Phone
Name:Member'auth°rized't~~within~t~the organization to Address:be responsible[~[ l ~ for conduct
Home Telephone: lqJ~'~¢ Bus'ess Telephone:
Member author~ed ~t~ ~e organization to be responsible for ~g ~e ~ci~ report ff ~e organization
ceases to e~st: ~ ~-4~ ~ ~; ~
Do you, ~d each officer, ~ector ~d member of the org~tion ~y ~ders~
A. It A a ~olation of law to enter ~to a contract ~ ~y person, ~m, ~socm~o~ orgam~afi0~
~other qu~ed organization p~su~t to ~18.2-~.13 of the Code of
of ~y classffi~fio~atsoever, for the p~pose of organizing, m~a~g or ~nduc~g b~o gmes or
r~es? Yes ~. No
Bo
The organization must ~ -.intain and file with the County's Internal '~udit Department complete reco?ds
of receipts and disburs~,..ats pertaining to bingo games and raffles ...~equired by State and County Law,
and th,~such records are subject to audit by the County's Internal Audit Department?
Yes . No
Co
The organization must remit an audit fee of 2% of gross receipts with the Annual Financial Report not
later than December 1 unless gross receipts are less than $2,000? Yes ~ . No ~
Do
The organiTation must furnish a complete list of its membership to the County's Internal Audit Department
and wi~his application.
Yes . No
E°
The organi7ation shall be required to contribute an annual minimum of 5% of the gross receipts from all
bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community of educational purposes for which
the organization is specifically chartered or organized, and no less than 8% of gross receipts averaged for
three consecutive annual reporting periods. Yes L~. No
Fo
No person shall participate in the management, operation or conduct of any bingo game or raffle if,
within the/,pfeceding five years, he has been convicted of a felony or crime of moral turpitude.
Yes ,/ . No .
No person shall participate in the management, operation or conduct of any bingo game or raffle if that
person, within the past five years, has participated in the management, operation, or conduct of any bingo
game or raffle which was fotmd by a local jurisdiction to have been operated in violation of state law or
local ordinance. Yes ,~'. No
Any organi?ation found in violation of the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of the Code
of Virginia4 is subject to having such permit revoked by the local governing body?
Yes q,/' . No
Any person violating the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8 of Title 8.2 of the Code of Virginia, shall
be guilty of a Class 1 misdemean/or and any person violating the provisions of § 18.2-340.9 shall be guilty
of a Class 6 felony? Yes ~,/ . No
The organization must provide written notification to the County's Internal Audit Department of any
change !ir/elected officers or bingo chairperson during the calendar year covered by this permit.
Yes ,./ . No
19.
The organization must comply wi,)ff the provisions of the current Chesterfield County Bingo-Raffle
Administrative Manual. Yes ._/. No
Have you and each officer of your organi?ation read the attached permit and do youj~nfl each officer agree on
behalf of thc organi:,ation to comply with eacla of-the 'conditions therein? Yx:s~ ,.,// . No
20.
I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2-434 of the Code of Virginia, that all
of the above questions have been completely answered and that all the statements herein are true to the best of
my knowledge, information and belief?.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
Signature ofApplicant: ~'2~_~~ .(~.(~
Bus,ess Phone: ~qb ~q0~6 Home Phone:
STA~ OF ~RGI~_ a ~ d, ~ff
ClTY/COU OF TO-mT:
Subscribed ~d sworn to before me, ~ ~, ~~/~
Ci~/Co~W ~d State doresfid, tMs
~ ~ - ~t~'Pub~c
a Notary Ih~!b!ie ig and fo
199~'. . . -"'
BE IT RESOLVED THIS
RESOLUTION
day of /~/I~ , 1995 (date resolution passed), that
is hereby authorized to apply to the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
for a bingo/raffle permit on behalf of this organization for the 1995 calendar year.
Revised 10/1/93 Authorized signature (Officer or Director)
Ecoff PTA
5200 Ecot'f Ave,
Ct~ester VA 23831
" " 3
/0
//
, '""r.C2,~ )
,d '7 C-
3 '7'7
17
'4h.?b
'/o~
Ecoff PTA
5200 Eco~'l' Ave.
Chester VA 2383!
Ecoff PTA
5200 Ecr.;[f Ave.
'7~'?
'¥
Ecoff PTA
5,~
. ~.00 Ecoff Ave.
Cl~ester VA 23:331
OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY ATTORNEY
COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD
ADMINISTRATION BLDG. ROOm 503
P. O. BOX 40
CHES~PI~RFIEL~), VIl~GINIA 23832-0040
TELEPHONE (804) 748-1491
TELECOI°IEr (804) 796-i753
STEVEN L. MICAS
COUNTY ATTORNEY
JEFFREY L. MINCKS
DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY
STYLIAN p. PARTNEMOS
SR. ASST. COUNTY ATTORNEy
MICHAEL S. d. CMERNaU
LISA C. DEWEY
WENDELL C. ROBERTS
MIC~/AEL P. KOZAK
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEYS
April 18, 1995
Ms. Brenda White
14108 Granite Point Court
Chesterfield, Virginia 23838
Re: Ecoff Elementary PTA - Raffle Application
Dear Ms. White:
I am returning your application along with your check for a raffle permit. As of
to date I have not received your organization's membership list. If your organization
is still interested in holding a raffle, please resubmit your application with the required
organization's membership list.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Ver truly yours,
de 1 C. Roberts
Assistant County Attorney
1205:10008.1
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
Application for a Permit to Conduct
Bingo Games or Raffles
In support of this application, the applicant offers the following information under oath:
1. Official name of organization: //~,Oo[(x~/ mOoH/7-~I'A~ ~/?'d~/(~
2. Address of organization's headquarters (please include street address, city and zip code):
19t'cl(g/?-s x; /do l( w r t/4
3. Address where all records of receipts and disbursements are permanently fried: .5)4~/4~7 If
o
°
Names and address of owner of the property described in 3 above:
Address(es) where ~ingo games ~1 be held or ra~e ~a~gs conducted (plebe ~cludc street address, city and
zip code: /ddl ~o~ ~1~ ~ZV~, ~
NOTE: THIS PE~IT IS V?HD ONLY AT THE LOCATION DESC~BED IN 5 ~0~.
Dates or days of week and time when bingo games or raffles will be held at the above address(es):
Date when organization was founded: /]~;~at~7/
Has your organization been in existence and met regularly in Chesterfield County/or an adjacent county, city or
town for five (5) years immediately prior to making this application? Yes ~ .. No
Is your organization currej3tly and has your organization always been operated in the past as a non-profit
organization? Yes <J. No If not, explain
10.
11.
Tax exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code (if applicable):
State the specific type and purpose of your organization:
12.
13.
/
Type of permit applied for: Bingo Games __ Raffles / Both __
Application is for a new or renewal /permit. If renewing a ,permit, were fmancial reports fried
on time and in compliance with all applicable legal requirements? Yes / No
14.
List below gross receipts, if any, from all sources related to the operation of bingo games or instant bingo by
calendar quarter for the 12-month period immediately prior to the date of this application:
1st qtr: $ 2nd qtr: $ 3rd qtr: $ 4th qtr: $
15. Officers of Organization:
Name
President:
Vice President:
Secretary:
Treasurer:
16.
17.
Address Bus. Phone Home Phone
FZot ~d~J~w /Lo ~0y-5~ ~3 ~.~ 270/
Member authorize, d~within the organization to be responsible for conduct and operation of bingo games or raffles;
Name:/~¢'~qF ,~' t~,q/+///' Address:
Home Telephone: q$ 2- ~[qo/ Business Telephone: ?/~_ ~fi~ _.7
Member authorized within the organization to be responsible for filing the financial report if the organization
ceases to exist: /(or F
18. Do you, and each officer, director and member of the organization fully understand the following:
mo
It is a violation of law to enter into a contract with any person, firm, association, organization (other than
another qualified organization pursuant to §18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership or corporation
of any classification.,.>vhatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing or conducting bingo games or
raffles? Yes ~../. No
- over-
Bo
The organization mu, '~naintain and rifle with the County's Inter ' Audit Department complete re~orfls
of receipts and disbur~,ments pertaining to bingo games and rafflew4is required by State and Count½ Law,
and t~.ch records are subject to audit by the County's Internal Audit Department'~
Yes . No '
Do
The organization must remit an audit fee of 2% of gross receipts with the ~ Financial Report not
later than December 1 unless gross receipts are less than $2,000? Yes ,,-" . No .
The organization must furnish a complete list of its membership to the County's Internal Audit Department
and with t~application.
Yes ~. No .
Bo
F°
The organization shall be required to contribute an annual minimum of 5% of the gross receipts from all
bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community of educational purposes for which
the organization is specifically chartered or organized, a/nd no less than 8% of gross receipts averaged for
three consecutive annual reporting periods. Yes ,/ . No
No person shall participate in the management, operation or conduct of any bingo game or raffle if,
within ~,~l~eceding five years, he has been convicted of a felony or crime of moral turpitude.
Yes No
No person shall participate in the management, operation or conduct of any bingo game or raffle if that
person, within the past five years, has participated in the management, operation, or conduct of any bingo
game or raffle which was fou/rtd by a local jurisdiction to have been operated in violation of state law or
local ordinance. Yes ~//. No
H°
Any organization found in violation of the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8 of Title 18.2 of the Code
of Virginia/is subject to having such permit revoked by the local governing body?
Yes .//. No
Any person violating the provisions of Article 1.1 of Chapter 8 of Title 8.2 of the Code of Virginia, shall
be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and any person violating the provisions of § 18.2-340.9 shall be guilty
of a Class 6 felony? Yes //. No
Jo
The organization must provide written notification to the County's Internal Audit Department of any
change in/,e'lected officers or bingo chairperson during the calendar year covered by this permit.
Yes,-'" . No
K°
The organization must comply )~Sth the provisions of the current Chesterfield County Bingo-Raffle
Administrative Manual. Yes ~. No
19.
Have you and each officer of your organization read the attached permit and do you and each officer agree on
behalf of the organization to comply with each of the conditions therein? Yes ,~.-~.' No __
20.
I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in §18.2-434 of the Code of Virginia, that 'all
of the above questions have been completely answered and that all the statements herein are true to the best of
my knowledge, information and belief?
WITNESS the followingsignatures
S ignat ur eof Ap pll cant:
Title: '~-~C
Address:
Business Phone:
Home Phone:
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY/COUNTY OF ~
Subscribed and sworn to before me,
City/County and State aforesaid, this ] [
TO-WIT:
My Commission Expires:
day of
, a N_,g.otary Public in and for the
199 ,~ .
RESOLUTION -' .
BE IT RESOLVED THIS ?j day of /'~,~-'~/' , 199 ~ (date resolution passed), that
/J/cJt4~ ~ ~;', d~.tdrA.~ is hereby authorized to apply to the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
for a bingo/raffle permit on behalf of this organization for the 199 ~ calendar~r. ..~
Revised 10/1/93 Auth%ri~ed s~tu'3°e~
internal Revenue Service
District Director
P 0 BOX A-3290 OPN 22-2
CHICAGO, IL 60690
re: .JUL
ROCKY MOUNTAIN EL!( FOUNDATI~IN LTD
~;291 N E:ROAO.WAY PO E:OX
NiSSOULA, MT 59802
DeF ~ment of theTreasur¥
Employer Iden:tification Number":
81-0421425?
Contact Person:
MRS.'Y. RILEY
Cor~tact Tm;lephone Number:
(~121 oo/, '~.~
Our Letter Dated:
Sept. 182 1984
Addendem Applies:
Oear Applicant:
This mc, difies our letter c,f the above date in Nhich He stated that you
~,~c,~tld be treated as an .organizaticm Hhich is not a private fc, unda'bion until
the expiration of' your advance r~lin.q, period.
Yc,~r exempt status under section 501(a) of the I~ternal Revenue Code as an
organization described in section 501(c)(B). is still in effect. Based on the
informal;ion you submit'bed, He have determin~.d that you are not a private
f,:,undati'on within the. meaning of sect;i,z,n 509(a) of the code because you are an
organ ization of the type described in secti on .509(a) (2).
Gran~,;,:,rs a~d contributors may rely on this determination unless ~;he
Internal Revenue Service publ.is, hes notice to the contrary. Ho~ever: if you
I,:.se your section 509(a)(2) s'tatus, a grantor or contributor may not rely. on
this determination if he or she .was in part responsible fc, r~ or Has a~are of,
the act or failure to act, or the s~Jbstantial or m~terial change on the part of
the organization that resulted i~ your loss of such sta~;~s, or if he or she
acquired ~c, Hledoe that 'the Internal. Revenue Service had given notice that you
~oqld no longer, be classified as a section 50~(a)(2) organization.
if ~e have indica't~d i~ tho heading 'c,f ·this letter that an 5ddend~m
appties.~ the addendum enclosed is an integral part of thi.s letter.
Because this letter could help res,:,lve any questions about your private
'f,:,qndati,:,n s..tat~s, please keep it in your permanent records.
If you have any questions., please contact the person .~hc, se name and
telephone number arc. sh,:,;.~n abc,ye.
S
incereJ,?, your_k~
R. S. Nintr,:,de, dr~
O istric'b [Ii rector
Le';;ter 1050 (O0/CG)
RESOLUTION OF THE
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION
ADOPTED AT THE JANUARY 16, 1992
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING
CHAPTER CHARTERS AND BYLAWS
WHEREAS, a strong grassroots network of members and chapters will further the
Foundation's goals and objectives; and
WHEREAS, Article VII, Paragraph 4 of the RMEF bylaws provide that the Board of
Directors may authorize the formation of local chapters; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to clarify the relationship between the
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Inc. and local RMEF chapters.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that all local RMEF chapters be chartered
under the provisions of the attached chapter bylaws.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the RMEF Executive Director is authorized to
establish procedures for issuing and revoking charters for local RMEF chapters.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Executive Director is authorized to establish
and implement operating policies and procedures regulating RMEF chapter activities.
Motion made by.
and approved _
Dr, Hugh Hogle
unanimously
,seconded by
Keith Ward
OF THE
CHAPTER
CHAPTER LOCATION
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION, INC.
(city, state)
ARTICLE I
Relationship to Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation - This organization is a duly chartered
chapter of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Inc. ("RM~.F"), as provided by Article VII,
Paragraph 4 of the RMEF bylaws, and persuant to resolution passed by the Board of Directors
at the February 18, 1992 annual Board meeting. The Chapter is an organization composed of
RMEF members working on local fundraising activities consistent with the goals and objectives
of the RMEF. The RMEF is classified by the Internal Revenue Service as a non-profit,
charitable organization under sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.
ARTICLE
Name. The name of this Chapter is the"
Chapter, RMEF."
x,
ARTICLE l/I
Membership - Any person interested in furthering the purposes for which RMEF and the
Chapter are organized is eligible to become a member. All members of the Chapter must be
members in good standing of the RMEF.
Dues. There are no Chapter membership dues.
ARTICLE IV
Term of Chapter. The RME Chapter Charter shall remain in effect until December 31st
of the current year, unless revoked sooner by the RMEF Board of Directors. The Chapter
Charter must be renewed by the RMEF Executive Director on an annual basis.
ARTICLE V
Purposes. The purposes for which the Chapter is formed are exclusively for charitable,
educational and scientific purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code and its regulations as they now exist or may hereafter be amended. The Chapter
shall raise funds, on behalf of, and in cooperation with the RMEF. The Rocky Mountain Elk
Foundation, Inc., is an international, non-profit wildlife organization dedicated to the conservation
of the elk resource, and preservation and improvement of habitat for elk and other wildlife. All
funds raised by the Chapter shall be forwarded to the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Inc.'s
National Office to further the following objectives:
Perpetuate wild, flee-ranging elk populations, well balanced in age and sex, which
may be hunted and otherwise enjoyed.
Encourage sound management of elk, other wildlife and their habitat based on
objective scientifically based data.
Foster cooperation between federal, state, provincial, and private organizations in
wildlife and habitat management.
Disseminate information about current topics affecting hunting, wildlife
management and habitat conservation.
ARTICLE VI
Chapter Dissolution . Upon dissolution of the Chapter for any reason, all Chapter
property and funds shall be forwarded to the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Inc.
ARTICLE VII
Aca'vities. No part of the activities of the Chapter shall consist of attempts to influence
legislation by advocating the adoption or rejection of legislation through propaganda or otherwise,
or by contacting or urging members of the public to contact members of a legislative body for
the purpose of proposing, supporting or opposing legislation. No part of the activities of the
Chapter shall consist of direct or indirect participation or intervention in any political campaign
on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office, by making, publishing or
distributing written or oral statements or otherwise. Notwithstanding any other provision of these
bylaws, the Chapter shall not carry on any other activities that are not permitted to be cart/ed on
(i) by an organization exempt from income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
code and its regulations as they exist or may hereafter be amended, or (ii) by an organization,
contributions to which are deductible under Section 170(c)(2) of such code, or the corresponding
provisions of any future federal tax code.
The Chapter is organized solely to conduct local fundraising activities which further
RMEF programs to benefit elk and elk habitat. The Chapter is not authorized to represent the
RlV[EF/n any other capacity.
Operating Policies. The Chapter operates in accordance with the policies and procedures
specified in the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation "Big Game Banquet Handbook," as well as any
other policies governing Chapter operations that may be established by the RMF. F Board of
Directors.
ARTICLE VIII
Organization. The Chapter's governing body consists of a volunteer committee whose
primary function is to conduct local fundraising events. The members of the committee shall
annually designate a Chapter chairman, and the following sub-committee chairmen: - Publicity
- Arrangements
- Merchandise
- Business
- Ticket Sales
- Sponsor Memberships
The responsibilities of these volunteer positions are described in the RMEF "Big Game
Banquet Handbook."
All Chapter chairmen, sub-committee chairmen and committee volunteers serve at the
pleasure of the RMEF Board of Directors, and may be appointed or removed by the President,
as provided by Article VII, Paragraph 3 of the R_MEF bylaws.
RMEF COMMITTEE
BUDDY SMITH
JONAH BOWLES
ED GRAN
BRIAN/CHARLOTTE MOORE
GLENN MILLICAN
BOB HUGHES
BUDDY STOKES
FRANK HOLLIS
CARROLL FOSTER
ED HARPER
MIKE TAYLOR
BOBBY HARRISON
JAY ATKINSON
PAT PATTERSON
CHARLIE ALLEN
MIKE BISHOP
RAY WATSON
RICHARD PICKENPAUGH
NEIL VAUGHN
BOB KANE
:::2 - :
7: N{':' _
iL--'
?: 0: _: --
i _ l:
-{'_.,-::.
l:::/ii _
-~:.:':
::12 4:::
: :_' ,. ?.
.' :-::: :
:_.5--_;: :,
· 7::.
-vl:
-:. 1.: 71
7??..
-21 - _
.l 'r
::??':,; 7 ?
2222:: BLAiiKEF.'-_'
!4BBB.: .: ~i::EL:'
i !,':0:_:.::
: 7(*['L L ~Ci,'iL---:
~!7726
22173
31517
..... ....
!.27_":'7
:-_:777
11212':
· 1. :~.
:. _71-:-
_- :--_
'::
h:LL'f
2!'25
':': -- :.:4 COVE
E: :'--'.: O V E .-:: :?
~O::-.:}:E?
L~::::E F~::E--_ 7
':- ~ :{ 7'24
227
BOX
: LA;BBB<i: :YE
30:7:::7
CHANT:LL¥ VA 21922 7077780042
DALEV:LLE VA 24085
:ALE:! ¢~ 24157
......... v~ ......... 7:)361:~J2
F::;--' CHURCH V'::. 22:)44 7052:7?:(:
i272_-2 .:
!477777 .: C.'-':;.F,.O L L
227777 .:
1~2177 F :_-'HA?::"E:
l~_: 7L:
1177'9f F ?95/95
t 87'7:. i
L--NAa.: L£
S?ETT
2H:-::F'LE: E
77{37
2652
':.'737
2<'..'7
_-' lC::
-::?:
:0
i}187
Fsi ~
.-:5:2
;7-: _'.
::: :
-21::1
:::: 1:
!702
--: _:{:,
COLON!sOL ~E: ::::: 27554
TF:¢UTViLL£ %
22020 703%887~2
26!2!
24014 707774~773
-:TERL :!~.G :.;~ ::::: ::
_?NCH:?:: ,:~ 12522::
EZEE,:~E::E :/4 27.72.:
_-'J.-]i:
'_ :. ?~'_ --
:~?~it .-- : ~:./i ::
: t~R:--:
14-_-a 4:
"108222 F .]EUTSCPi:
.1 t 0(i27 --
: ~, t .":,.'il,': F
::."?824 F-
"-:, .--, P -i .--:
-,_-',
iT COL ~ L
'-: E!NT: L
R0 H.--:T E
'::e': :-L.¥-: .:-,
i,--.? :
'.;AVl:? 5
RiCHAF'D H,
7,.-":~RS ?i,
_-. 0EL :'
.-." ~EL
F~:::--.T?
iF; --.
--'i!
i.-' ? T :'E.-- F'-: ~.~ .' !i
~:0; E F.:R'¢ }%'-,'. T
;0; :~L?iE .:5:.
19~7 CHE~THUT
29! ~ULF
NN~7
9? ~LUES:iD6£
:.252,5 FL:HOOD :'iF..:
F'C..: ?n',: :'(,8
!37! V i.;:S Zi,::: ~
771'-:. COU:F,:THOU.: E
501 :- ~i!{ .--_.T ~._-
!4':i ~LlaS:7c D'.-i
:.:l ;
7 l..-"{}
F'E, H:(
E;Dt! ::'EVE!',:. MILL:_ '2
5: i :G.( '-.-.i5
2E!5 -:TEF'HE?-:.;-'d~'i ~V
~20 5:!i::--_
.:.3)5 ~ijlHEF'.i}i2
~C,':.: 57--_-:i;{ !'.C2
i(:'"((! LiTTL: ::
:- : :.]'{
'i'1~ :1:':_--.: l~:::-
17:_" ';Z.,E; l-:!::-
??l :':. {? i_-'£'i_-~
BEALETO~ V~ 127~2
A~4t~ANDALE VA 22003
;¥THFV:LLE VA 2&]~:.' 7032285848
F~;RF~X V~ 220JT 7035917779
::::::~'~::' ::-: :j~ 2345i
CL:FT6t'i :+:::: :;~ '..:i4'..77
............ ,¢: 2.:..274
:G:E._--ViLL-- VA 22:2.:i
:F:Y:'iT F.:Tf~L v: 12:.'-.:'::
% iT:O.'-_.. 50455.02:7?
7E7- r E.'z'-i
-:?:- r
-~_- r ZD~
SS22 c
i{'0527: EJLL
::is~ r :'
-_-:-7 r
..':i.. -rS :
--:j ,;:.;: _.
i:-"%-
::.
:LO':'":: ~,
_:":~EE. ¥
.-.' :Jr': T ~ }
-: - ZZ
E,
F.-i::S:] 7": ]
~. _-EL i :;
1770C ~; COUfTT:' ii~;
T{'i 7~NiPE~:
:4N: :DLEP. SOk CT
:cT i ~9X
2475:
1711
2':'27-7 7(,..-:.343121{
?:('i~ 7:::777:7727
CASTLE V~ 24:27 7033::70!0"
PJ :EKE YA 22915
:...-,.-:..=-m,,: VA 27.=:24
12%7
.... -~::'-
:. ::'.x ' '
.......... 'RT 2 :.m,' ':,.':
:'..,n~[¢6~ iF 40.i7 ~'u,'..:':.cF,::,.-',~
RUSTY 227..-- TRANT LAKE
}:ALL E.:.2". 7 KURTZ
;~NAL; :T 2 -:'~( ':2."2
!4~LTE;: 7, a--_17 C]U~:'L'-':h!: 3'.--..
l& 3E--' 77 PaS.;N
.--AP. 2 SCl-::
:-{CF.: 2 _::C"X-_-i
2~¢:LT:]:~ =-- :_20 .-.O:JETT
F:~N~LD R -320:BUFF~L2 AVE
!(~THY 50.55
K£NHETH F 5i{:,2 }:::~EP
D~RYL i F~:T i ~O,:::
TE;:?Y ~{T5 --' E L :'-': f:
TSDn ::7_,;2{,
':'?: ----':'i }~'il% F{ 761
:_F:i2 !: :---F iA"-:H~:i-_-:- :V:
..-'i~q{i; ;.T i ~:i.: 7::
"::'_ -'04i '7ARi-- 27,
~:Fl ,~ il! --k~_-::: _:- ':
ltl?!', ' :i 5-i
F:A:' :. :-:-:
{: i::-i:
:22.;27
D7:L'--'
~ .---'22
!
!.:2!i'::
t :- ':.-:.'-: 7
178712
::~li5
--E575
772.._"-.7
{;~:27
.'¢1{'77
: L :;.'-4: :..-'" { i-'"' J::
BLACiciS:UE5 VA 240,:::' 7<;.-S6S. 7¥0B".=
C~:LE:H:E t.,'A 2:717 7076467G6S
8TAFF~F. cD VA 2255~ 7077522717
::~?HZNE VA '.'"4471 70S.:,775273
uR.?,.':TNf:,:. ~.', V~ 2';454 "" ........
:~_---. S [ VAS. 2427~
· _-. ',:i: u ?,.-.,~, V: 27150
?{~:.'.'iAS SAS ':/A
CCLDHiAL HG: VA 258._':..4 80452~956<:
:,-'"'~ 1207~ 7:'.':.T.:.T:C:-.:.-'-7
:¢:h,'_'.?~:A ?:E:-'. :.::-! 2._-".'::i
C:]L3~i:~L HL:E :;: 2.5~.:.:
:ur iA:.,_-: ::: :,;: £-'. 42::
ALE} ::n--A: '-: ........... ~'"'-' .....
'/:! ;- Z .:: ' / :.;.J 7 '~ i £ ~.2: Z,
'-;LUE??": :,:: 227'
E:,;:HGrO: :¢: 24.:'.:0 80::82:00:0
V~ 12975
}i--:'.~PgR? :.:i~q :.-"a '::~F:-: ':'.048752_:,5_7
V::: 2'~::: S045~7297:
VA 12052
VA 220'-:5
:TAUHTON :Fi 24::'....'i
:.--: -iAi:: :;5
~::L-':.::L:-- '~:: ::;:: 7:::775;--:777
_:2: 7--'~ ,.'A i_-77:
.E-- :---- l; ,_: '-:4 :Si:T: 7:7777::'_-2:
LE:.:ET::,::_CE:/.:.
;:':::~,L':::: :: ,-._,' "<: ':7J::7:11
?t::lH:_: ..:: il:l: 7 C J: 7'_-- l.i-.-" _:
:~-:. :
...--:::.: : _-~].'---n.--_~.
:;.': :
'-':-:: ..'-£F- ::
: :-.'.2S--':
--.::' ' :
- :.::.--,::
.-3JR:EL:
,-_:_--- _- '..:.:A¢..._:.:,:..:::~:·...:
---::: : :',.'_,.:;'.-
' -' ":":"::
' :::--.-: :':::TS;C?'::
::,.?:: : ,'.-.:::::::',,... :..
- ;::,_: : .'--.'27~.:,'
: :' :~¥:: :-.::_:~27--
:--_': ~:: : ::EL_::
:2:7.2:: :'::: ~
: ::: :'_:- ._-
:".;'427C: <:£VE~'t::
£0:')552: :-.-.:--'qE:
:25757 .:
52712-- --
---_.':?94 ? :":;9:iCq :,':72
'--. (iC:-~: 7 _--
: (,-):?: :
- ~ ' : :_-."( 465 ---
:::-4: ':__: -:.::'SS
:2' ~:.:.
24222 ::::/:--Rh
:-: 7, C.'-'.'
-. -:,.,:. ;:::::::.~ .% .--23
:".'.2 _--:FZ~R;_ ~?
------. -- 1¢2.:~,,
'"'~ :'::;':' :~TE
404 ~O:'SLE':
:-' ::JX
,:: . :ri:z,:.-.': 57
:,:¢ 2:'7
:--.:: :5:-:.7
'::: '¢:'-': :--i~
i4=_': '.E '_'.~:k ?
::):.. L?SE:'7
_ _ _ ~.·fi,f o
..:.7 .: :'ES 252 .':'
· : ! ::-- :.
::.:.:::
:.T, : :'~X 27
.":'Si :."~VY8 --?:
:-: ~3X .--_'5':
_:: 1': ?:--:~:iF_D¥
:::21':.. EL:SC ::
5(-": ~L? SE:':--:'
27 --ES:%"".: --
: :_' ::: F.J-L::{
7 ::..- FLi:¢:
_:.22 .--'_:~:::: {:.
::.) F'::'i.:
:'; : :':X
;2 ::3×
.S. 20 ~77-- ;: ~."-':_ S
:: E:?';.~ -"::
::s',:::: :,',~ :sa 27015
FE:~'30: .~: 22,.'.:7 ::
:_:'.:.SE_:. T :.-"'i
:TAFF:R:' :>".:~,~.,: .....
%,, .:.'O ~:'l ,~
E?.OZE- VA 2?32
~_7.-': t..:lSTA:.-'"A 24¥?
:OO::--~:.-_:i:.. u,', s: i~.,-'
:-'": ?.:" T 8 i'. %: 24:72. 2(:674:7252
.'.'~:E:-aPE~.!:::E V~ 2:.320 S045477227
VR -"0£=.~ ~...~..
:40ODBR:D,_-.: ?: 22!?2
THE PLAINS V~ 2'--.'!7!
:-..,,':,, T,' VA 2385:
_:-SR::!';: :7::: : 0 i ~-.-_-.
~'.:.::-:,.~::--LD VA 22157
~A:::;:~ V: ]2C_':0
3~::::LL~' v~ 2'.-'02-.-':
~J~D:RiD:£ '-?A 22i:,.2 :-:..--.4-:27.:.'-".7
L:BE_-TTEF,...--:.--.._;: VA 23577
~::DLCT:::A:: :.,"~ 272 iZ
· x':57=_ F LTGE.:<
ZK07~: LES~E
:N7~i F
65681 F
t57~?: LEPLEY
2~475J:
:77%6 F
17~t7:
?}65! F
41'!2}:
:7:74:
X-t:: -
JLTY _:? ZF
~UT~E;:LA~: '.72~ '!i,H5 5i2!94
2!58~_ :?)482!1964
24121 705297a573
WINCHESTER ?A 2260~ 705~77!76!
ALEXANDRIA VA 22;10 70NZ255~2
;; l ;:~-;~oa. VA iisi
LEE--HF,:3 '?::: 2NiS 7077774~8
5L!JE R'~D~:= V~ 2z{64
· ~ :¥.",~:~',:':.', V3 7.7'r'.-,; 70..'--'.-2175775
:~l-7::--l;:Jl& ;~.l ;!&
CHqN/;LLf ¥% 22921 79T';7u_,27':7
STRASBUF-::.: :,-" A. 226.-_-'7
EFF. if!SF/EL':,:tis 2ii~J
7YE FL&2. E ;/4 21171
E >-F-Z L:: ,:': 23.-7
::~i>_.-:::%R'::i-:,5 iJLE~
.,/'
::.-.::':-:: :?::'."{,'-"
MOODY
%O:,~f
,"~._
57:-?:_ El{ ? :'-!: 21
- %:'ii :. :i
_.. -.
:,-i: 2131
lO:!,: ::l: 2LOV-ZLL:
: q?!':'?-9 ~ ::lJ
-s,::- : ' 5: .=--:
-izk :
%,¥ 57:.7
.~ ]!.j
~?':: H, or: l--'l.
:'::- 72": 2=
--i:=-.' :'~
: i~ 282_!
...... 7 _
'{EL?.: & F:7 (
· <a'--, l :.y~¢c ._':.
.'_= E~:& E: f iv!?
DOUS.,L&-: FY:
:FiZz: .. %2:
:-:~:l ~( -.=: :.'.::?r
;:--}!~!E::~ ._:
??? :' AfqE8
%:J=!' - -
: . 71 _:.-.--::'
:' ~ :,--;.: ' ::'7
10::: E. .::_
~:tk:~: -_- i:::
_:OK::::: % :- O :'-':
.%r ._- ::.+=__ 536
.... m.'.~.. ~-
:¢q
.:HESTEP. FiEL:: V& 2.:.652
:&N-!ESV:LLE V~ 2'..-"<:!65 7077470742
::'--v~v:::: V¢ 2..:..*-.-"47
::E¥S:.;':LLE V: :,7947 ~04772!975
C~E~AF'EA!::E VA 2._:..7.'.":
::':EYSV:LLE :¢~ 2.:.:..'.'47
F::F:F:): VA 220? 7{:727::8547
V& 22:8: 70.:,9::,8777.:.
T:*!:E..:::: :LE VA 2285.:-. 7058968?'
24127 70385465(:':
¢::'='"'::'"':'"= V: 25..':',20 80442,?0$74
COLOf41AL HE: :,."A 2..";.:..:4 804520!%7
COLON.:AL ~E: VA
~'::=:',:, :¢a ':?_::~. 7(i,.-:,725240E
FJ~SPUR :¢& 24727: 7057287640
LE):lf'iGTSf{ VA 2:450
R:CHMO!.G VA 2.7!28 8<342.:67255
F':0F:TSf':::UT~7: 2_--7727.
8 ::F:.L P-.;:~ :.:~ 27:::: 64
N .:- F.. .= L: L?:: :::
HOF'7: T~:E-i~F :.'"'~ '--.'47_-.-: V:":
~:aP:=P: :' '-:.j ~
~:?:J:: 5VER~TEEET JEFF L,
:%27F: .]i4EX '~F;TZ:4 ;:
Z2ET~4 F %RKE?.
?255: F'~UL ~.~9ERT L
L: .: : :_:~F:E
tO7 ¢ F'D?; ~T
RT 6~ ~¢X 7i ;.
J3J/ ;
i?OE LEE~ C~F:;,EF ~:
:5:5 ?];( 27?
~LE:,..'R%F::~ % 2%!0 7(5_,~227447
? ?;!q~ V~ 22 ! .--" !
BE~.?.YVZLLE Vq 22~L~
F~::;AX V~ 22 :.'~7 7032~7j775
F~:EDEEZCKSSU ,/A 22~05
EL?'Z CF:{E:: .~ ZiTi~ 7:577777t~7
~9U7~ :SF ;~]C :,4 Zij~j 7Z:J~T~Z~a~
:'{:.
· . 71 .:".::: .:
[472.57: ~A'.--.:LEE
228824:
· 52727 7
i778827 F
210L l
:--'0')[ i ~_ .--
F'.-.- 4 -''Tc =
FIT_-"-::
] !._:'}? ~:
7:3.'7'-- R '_?_ F: 7 :_'
-~2:" --: .i
':-- 28--
---- 7 -'..'--~: -
: :-. -:E----_ 122,
;l - ~[:::
:::- }:]:
:: ?:.,
-._-' 4 ::' .:-.
2_:i(: ~i
575( '::~::ER:5~ ::"..:,,.
-7'i L.:
'27: i~xiE
:': :-,5: .:.4~
:?7: ::::t/EB :..'23~"'
:7 : ?:)' ii':::
:.T 22
::): ~i:LP
· 7'::7 :~.-:.:::(::':_':': :--'
72( q:: LLi41TE,.-:.
_-'7772
::_ _:'1)' 4
.2(": ':.:: L_:~,:
82:-_-. ':'~REE -:.F:ZD'_:.,,
· 7.5:.--.' '2LTL<& ::.':,;,,
F:T: BO.'-': 57 f-.,--
,:577 OL~
:--..? ~ --:~: 7..-:-:
:g :?-( ,:,7('
:7{ !:a?:.:L?' &:-,;~!::J_--
~:.:: _:'~: :5:
:- 2.
F.T :: :O}'
ii!: :iF. ET E7~
2i7- :::::-3(
._.T : 2:::':' ':.,:.£
N,,~P:]5:T NEB:-: VA 2.:6(2
VA 24502
:.,:: 222:7.:. ~:)452825'T: ---
VA 23i7.:, 80452.'84122
VA 24015
V~q £ ." kJ 0,.~
FLINT HiLL V~ 22827
WHIT,, F'O~: ~,~
~:,,..-:~: u~: ,m 22186
BF,.iDE,,"4AT,,:' VA
:,':RE:tEL
24550
A ~
-..._-:(~: .._: _-
--{.}%.:' :
7._---.%. z
~ '-- S_'-.'.:-' ? --
2' &')UT:
49:.a) .--
'' LTz, Z
!{:)'.::'L:-7 F
: ~,! [:.Z" --
. .-%T'. &: --
: ~ 15)'.-::
· ':: ?(,: ~ :
22{:('.3'!.:
'£hi-- :'
%.',:'i~,z- 2
7 -- 7':F 2
-' 272.5 .T
_25>1%.::':':
.-]'F :;.E.:,:
~ETTL--
~ :..[ ,_', F.,. :--. F
_--HEP~E z'.D
--'2_ z 2 T' ---i.
,;.EVN4 .~ H.C ! 3{(
C*_-~J~:EV!LLE ,:~ £2020
~OPE~ELL ;~
.._ .-. ::: -- -_,~_--..: -_.~',!' -- .
- - -.-:_'::- :¥- _2:---
::..--- --::: : :-,:..::21 .... : :
--.: :
-.::- :--_.:::' ::::ET-'_'::.-::-:-:
: -"-- : :_.::: T~ --
_-.~:--: -.-:_- -...-. :,:~::::.
":~.: : ?E-r_.~:)4 :~T: :,:.,:.-: :: "---: "" ::7 .':-"]~?
.. _-., .'~<::':~ ~:--': :,:.. ....
:_ .-.72 : .....
' -- :'- :E:,'.:::'::-]-- '.::::::
- ---.~- : .:: :'::!'.:~:-: F :-:-:----:- -:~-
.- :.--: : ::--~:::: ._:, .......
· ---' : :-, :::. :E'--'E:: :.~ :: ::: ---
:2477a F 57A%78: JSSHd~ ::,ii DECATHLg¢.
--:--: :' -5-:~,:: ~.:i ~ ~. 2191 .-_'t'L_-~:,.:- :
-~::. : :~-.:::' :.:'::~:':' :::5: :.:Et'AXE :.iV-:
:.',: ay Va 24777 70J.-23~255i
~:, r.:x:..s~..: VA 23213333 8343447111
AMELIA CT HO VA 23.C.:02
:.EE.-:.:UR: ?~ 2207.:. 70777:7:):):
FAiEF.'::× STAT Va. 2203..?
:L:JEZ:EL: V: 24~05 707_72.:_!272
SAL'::ViLLE VA 24570 70.726'..--'457.:O
iZi%l F TURNER
iE?:- : TUTTLE
:~ X442 F
· _:37?:
2-:--: : :~:__:..
ST?HEX 8,
E
}!Z:2N~EL F,
~LFRE5 !
9RE?iT
EELLY
~!LL
C~RLE: L,
_-:5..- l
: [ /:~;;EF
iX:i:
HO?.{TE::: :,;~ l??,~ 70.!%_2iii
STEFHE?E 217 ,.':: 22_-'.55
',5
,'_-'fiAS:LOTTEE~: YR 22:.(;2
{LZ, FTe~4 FOF5 ~;~ 24422
c?~ lain 7)73474::
?a .: :irE(F'
V ~ '? ~. 5; 0 :'
.:{~PH ';,."E ;."~ 24472
nrur,-'-..~i Va 2.:.i27 6047%87..--
,% lz('{4
i:'~;i15!~¢-i;7;;: :?' 9-TqP:
....... ,.. ..
...... 394442~77z
::i'¢THET.;LL'-i V~ SSS.:
.-':E_:27042i ',2~ 2202.'~ 7(-:..7.7~ 8(:$:-'
N3:-[EN:LLE ~,-'"~ 22127 70.-7:-.'?':
CHE~TES. FiEL_-722~ 17~71
:::':ir:'.~:,, ..~ :-:.:'r>'m ;:,' iE!_-}
:~T;; Tq!--'-':-.~.U~: 6 £71E7
--.c. H F~/; -' 113¢7 7177~(:TN:-
%,E;'~?i: l:: ,:25 ii-_f! 71477i; l,li
- _- .._: :.[ .....
i: : ::/-L!ti_:T2! Zq'Z.- ': t
- : i*:-;--_T
"-- ::--: : '---;:El L,
c i4E.:J TE:RSOi: ._-' T E':-,: E
") F i,Z,Z ~-_-:
"-- ;~: LL ;~::- :'_"HF,-
"-: ~: LL N_ 83 ':'.'
: -- ;.?_-'CS'f AFc'
--O: ..-F.:~ ~E: ;i'iF ?}
15200 PE_".LLZP LEE
._- .-, ~:f',: '~f'.,~.
oRq JEFcE?i!."::~ ._-.'-
14(' :_iZiEFi LAKE L~
· EE:EE~L kELZk
:l; _:-RL-:-':F:~0~[. '_-T
!~;C: iF:'./_"-!,; CT
22?0 ~ZLE:-=.. ~R
F:T ! .-30:(
PO B~X .~"7
..:.:T 2 ~:0:( .-_'lO
1741'; OCCO~L:.:t:'{
::i- _-- 21(
LE × i.~4.{-.TO: VA 24450
:..~=x c VA 24521
24155
.k% 5,::1A2_ ¥.':: 2441.~ 70547477TM
F&L::FA){ VA 220.:*.,2 2053.t'.1~2E5
Yh'
L:E~N.:~. \:;:-: ':2(,7~ 7;i.._--.-777577,
ALE;(Af4::iA :?~ 22.1..~2 7057.':.5~3675
u~,._ '?A 2%57
FROt',.-'T ..;,:O':"AL ?A 2265(; 7t:.'J..&;S7708
',.'x .z-,.:...'.¢
SF'.~'!iN6FiEL~ VA 2'ii53
VA 22.~ii 74:545524EZ
CHE. HTZANS~:J VA 24{,7~
ELi( CREEK VA: 24.72,-'.
A L ['. i E,-t'~ VA 22001
VA 245% 8::}4525;5,"6
LURA¥ VA 2%..-,5
:..,aESETT '.,% 2"-.:(55 7"..::JSliil. ll
BASSETT VA 24(65
:.a;z!q iLLE :.%
~.':_&T FALL-- VA 2206-6
~lr. iCHEETE~: YA 22~(,3 705667824(
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
June 14, 1995 Item Number:
Page 1 of 1
8.C.8.
,Subject:
State Road Acceptance
Count~ Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAcfion Requested:
Summary of I nformafion:
MATOACA:
Martin Glen
Preparer:,
Attachments:
Y~$
---] No
Title: Director, EnviroD_mental Engineering
ODO
TO: ~
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE:
Board of Supervisors
Environmental Engineering
State Road Acceptance - Martin Glen
June 14, 1995
Martin Glen Road
Martin Glen Terrace
Martin Glen Place
Martin Glen
Vicinity Map
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page ! of !
Meefin Date: June 14, 1995
Item Number: 8. c. 9.
Subject:
Change Order Number 1 for County Project Number 93-0093E
Jahnke Road Water Line, Phase II
Administrator' s Comments
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested:
Staff requests that the Board approve Change Order number 1 for the
additional construction work by the Contractor, G.L. Howard, Inc., in
the amount of $48,000 and authorize the County Administrator to execute
the necessary contract documents.
Summary of Inf0rmation:
Change Order Number 1 includes additional work and materials required to
build a temporary construction access road across Powhite Creek and the
surrounding low lying area. This Change Order is a result of changed
field conditions due to the relocation of the original waterline
alignment. The original alignment provided a more convenient
construction access; however, due to the relocation, this access is no
longer available. Funds for this Change Order are available in the
current Capital~I~ve~/Budget.
Preparer: ~
Title:
Assistant Director
~---~ Yes
O92
Attachments: No
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: June 14:, 1_995
Item Number: 3. c. 10.a.
Subiect:
Award of construction contract for County Project #94-0120R,
Point of Rocks Road Water Line Extension.
County Administrator's Comments
County Adminintrator:
Board Action Requested:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors award the construction
contract to Richard L. Crowder Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of
$76,770.15 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary
construction contract documents.
Summary of Information:
The project consists of installation of approximately 2300 L.F. of 12"
water line and all associated appurtenances in Point of Rocks Road as shown
on the attached map. This project will provide system reliability and
added fire protection.
We have received four (4) bids ranging from $76,770.15 to $89,819.00. The
lowest bid was in the amount of $76,770.15 by Richard L. Crowder
Construction Company, Inc. Our engineering consultant J. K. Timmons &
Associates has recommended to award the contract.
Funds for this project are available in the current C.I.P.
Preparer: ~
Attachments:
Yes
No
Title:Assistant Director of Utilities
093
SCREAMERSVI~
ENON
APPOMATTOX RIVER
,'nON
POINT OF
VICINITY MAP
SCALE:
1"=2000'
CHES'TERI
WHIPPOORWIll
094
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meeting Date: ,.Tune '14, 1995
Item Number: 8 .a. lO. b.
Award of construction contract for County Project #94-0122R,
River Road Water Line Rehabilitation.
County Administrator's Comments
Admini~,~rator:
County
Board Action Requested:
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors award the construction
contract to Richard L. Crowder Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of
$320,886.12 and authorize the County Administrator to execute the necessary
construction contract documents.
Summary of Information:
The project consists of replacement of 2" and 4" water main with
approximately 1760 L.F. of 12", and 7,427 L.F. of 8" water line and
appurtenances in Robertson Place, Noweta Gardens, Old Town Creek and Perdue
Property Subdivisions. This project will add system reliability and added
fire protection to these areas.
We have received five (5) bids ranging from $320,886.12 to $477,846.00.
The lowest bid was in the amount of $320,886.12 by Richard L. Crowder
Construction Co., Inc. Our engineering consultant R. Stuart Royer &
Associates, Inc. has recommended to award the contract.
Funds for this project are available in the current C.I.P.
Preparer:
Attachments:
Yes
No
Title:Assistant Director of Utilities
O95
-/
ST~IT
VICINITY
MAP
096
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin Date: June 14, 1995
Item Number: 8.c. ll. a.
Subject:
Request Permission for a Fence to Encroach within an existing 16'
Drainage Easement
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
BoardAcfionRequested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant
Leo and Michele Groux permission to have a fence encroach within an existing
16' drainage easement; subject to the execution of a license agreement.
Summary of Information:
Leo and Michele Groux have requested permission to have a deck encroach
within an existing 20' drainage easement. This request has been reviewed by
staff and approval is recommended.
District: Dale
Jo}{n W. Harmon
Attachments:
Yes ~--~No
Title:,,,
Riqht of Way Manaqer
# [
VICINITY SKETCH __
REQUEST PERMISSION FOR A FENCE TO ENCROACH WITHIN AN EXISTING 16'
DRA.~NA~E EASEMENT - LEO & MICHELE GROUX
096
This iS to certify that an accurate field survey of the premises shown hereon has been performed under my supervision; that ail improvements and VlSiCle evidence of
h re are no encroachments Dy ~mprovements ether ~rom adjoining premises or from subiect premises other tharl shown hereon. This
easements are shown hereo~; and that t. · ..... ~ ..... ~.....,~, m~v h,~ ?~ ~'losed by such This dwellin(3 is In FEMA defined flooo zone ,~- .
L= 73'~'~''
A//O'R -f H FO D
Scale:/'--
Job No.: J~:~o?_~
· PLANNERS · ARCHITECTS · ENGINEERS · SURVEYORS ·
501 Branchway Road · Suite 100 · Richmond, Virginia 23236 · 794-0571 · Fax 794-2635
1514 East Parham Road · Richmond, Virginia 23228 · 262-6046 · Fax 264-3037
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page I of I
Meeting Date: June 14, 1995
Item Number: s.o. ll.b.
Subject:
Request Permission for a Deck to Encroach within an existing 20'
Drainage Easement
County_ Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors grant
Mr. Levi Thomas permission to have a deck encroach within an existing 20'
drainage easement; subject to the execution of a license agreement.
Summary of Information:
Mr. Levi Thomas has requested permission to have a deck encroach within an
existing 20' drainage easement. This request has been reviewed by staff and
approval is recommended.
District: Bermuda
Attachments:
Yes [____JNo
Title:
Riqht of Way Manaqer
#
Vt( ~H
REQ.UEST PERMISSION FOR A DECK TO ENCROACH WITHIN AN EXISTING 20'
DRAINAGE EkSEMENT - LEVI THOMAS
101
7
S 79" 12'50" W ~
w~:
IrON
GLEN OAKs
The Survey Is Subject To Any
E~oment Of Record And Other
Pe~!inent Facts Which A Title
Search Might Disclose.
~HIS~I,S TO CERTI~ THA~gN TW' OA¥
HANI_IN
ESTATES
16
RON
FO.
,, RON
~E~ENT
2
I
GLEN OAKS
SE]STION FOUR
Note:
~fhis Property I$ Not Within
A, HUD De'lined Flood Plain
Flood
FD.
No. 1222
LOT 2, RESUEOIVISICN CF LOT 23
ERIN GREEN AND ADJACENT PRDFE]RFf
10800 ERiN GREEN COURT
BER~JDA DISTRICT
r"~-~"l-F'p~'l~'t r3 C(hl II~ITY, VIRGINI h
10;~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin Date: June 14, 1995
Item Number: s.C.12.a.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along the East Line of Hopkins Road
(State Route 637) from H & B Associates, Inc.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept
the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.046 acres along Hopkins Road
(State Route 647) from H & B Associates, Inc., and to authorize the County
Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
Summary of Information:
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible
through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County
Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and
will decrease the right' of way costs for road improvements when constructed.
Dist~ct: Dale
Preparer: jovan W~. H~ar~non~-f~r~
Attachments:
Yes
No
Title:
Riqht of Way Manaqer
103
'~'ICINITY SKETCH
ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF HOPKINS ROAD
(STA~ ROUTE 637) FROM H & B ASSOCIATES INC
104
n
Z
N3679791.7274
El1781726.2077
N 53o17'01" W
14,26
~N 82049,25,, W
45.00
BEULAH
METHODIST
UNITED
CHURCH
N3679793.2507
El1781740.6174
i~AOZIHGO ~ ~ Ol 1994
H & B ASSOCIATES, INC.
PARCEL NUMBER 66--8--(1)--15
DB 2684, PAGE 756
PLAT OF 0.0460 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND
TO BE DEDICATED TO
tHE cou.tY of CHESTE.flELD
~ZINGO ~ ASSOCIATES
CONSULT I NO ENG I N/ERS
RICH~ND, VIRGINIA
DATE: MAY g, 199B SCALE: 1" ~ 20'
DDS: 9419-C04
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of 1
Meetin~ Date: June 14, 1995
Item Number: 8.c. 12.b.
Subject:
Acceptance of a Parcel of Land along the West Line of West Hundred
Road (State Route 10) from Chesterfield Associates, Inc.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
Board Action Requested: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept
the conveyance of a parcel of land containing 0.108 acres along West Hundred
Road (State Route 10) from Chesterfield Associates, Inc., and to authorize
the County Administrator to execute the necessary deed.
Summary of Information:
It is the policy of the County to acquire right of way whenever possible
through development to meet the ultimate road width as shown on the County
Thoroughfare Plan. The dedication of this parcel conforms to that plan, and
will decrease the right of way costs for road improvements when constructed.
District: Bermuda
J~hn W. Harmon
Attachments:
Yes
NO
Title:
Right of Way Manaqer
#
· , ~. VT~TNTTY ~m~ ~
ACCEPTANCE OF A PARCEL OF LAND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF WEST HUNDRED
ROAD (STATE ROUTE 10) FROM CHESTERFEILD ASSOCIATES INC
N
:1.07
N%19'15 OJ
SWM/81WP E~SE~ENT '----'-'-------~-~ '
o.o~o~,~L_~ ,., ~r
O.B 2691 PC,. 272,~.
~'~ ~"-'-(')-~
i
~ u.u. z1~, P~993
-~ ,. ~ .... , ~~ .
57' ~ ""--'-S 2 05'02" W
RECIPROCAL
INGRESS AND E~RESS
EA S~M EN T
{D.B. 214~.PG. 957)
PREVIOUS JOB NO.
I.K TIMMONS & ASSOCIATES. P.C.
ENGINEEBS * ARCHITECTS * SURVEYOBS
711 N. COURTHOUSE RD. RICHMOND, VA
8803 STAPLES MILL RD. HENRICO CO., VA
44lI CROSSINGS BLVD. PRINCE GEORGE', VA.
DA TE: APR. I~ I995 SCAL~.: 1 ~40'
DRA~flV BY: A.~..S~
JOB NO.: 16179-62
CALC. CHK.:
Meeting Date:
June 14~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
1995 Item Number:
Page 1 of
ADDITION
Subject:
Initiate a Conditional Use Permit Application for a stock farm at 4865 Ecoff Road
Counter Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Initiate an application for a conditional use permit a stock farm at 4865 Ecoff Road
Summary of Information:
Julia Williams and her family have been keeping two dwarf goats at their home which lies on
approximately seven acres in a Residential District (R-7) for approximately one year. Mrs.
Williams has indicated that she thought her property was zoned Agricultural (A) which would
permit the keeping of farm animals. In addition to the goats, Mrs. Williams desire to keep a
maximum of three horses.
Mr. McHale has requested that the Board initiate an application for a conditional use to permit
Mrs. Williams to maintain a stock farm (two goats and three horses) at 4865 Ecoff Road.
If Mrs. Williams applied for this conditional use permit, the application fee would be $1,121.
Therefore, if the Board initiates this application, the Planning Department will forego this amount.
Mrs. Williams has already paid $560 which will be refunded to her if this item is approved.
[--~ Yes
Title:
Director of Planning
10568.1
Attachments: No
Meeting Date:j,,.~ ~ a. ~ oo~
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY-
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Item Number:
Page _L. of ~9,-
Subject:
Extend operation of Winterpock Dumpster Site For 60 days from July 1 - August 31,
1995. Operating hours to be 7 days/week from 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Count~ Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAcfion Requested:
Request Board to authorize County Administrator to extend operation of the Winterpock
Dumpster Site for 60 days terminating August 31, 1995, which will require extending the current
lease which terminates June 30, 1995 and appropriate $2,000 for cost of lease and $14,000 for
operations. Source of funds will be identified during FY 1996 through a budget change request.
Summary of Information:
On April 14, 1994, the Board adopted the FY 1995-1996 operating budget which included
closure of this site. ( see attached sheet).
Preparer:
Attachments:
No
Title:
Director, General Services
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page o~ of ~
Summar~ of Information: (Continued)
Staff recommendation to close Winterpock was based on the following costs
distribution:
and frequency
Vehicle/Day Cost/Ton
Winterpoek 35 $105.18
North & South 1,037 $ 43.90
Revenues: $14,000/yr
Operating Costs: $100,O00/yr Loss:
Additional factors considered were:
· Winterpock urbanization
· Commercial haulers now provide services in that area
· No other targeted segment of County has a similar site
· Needed money to expand curbside recycling program
Additional services extended to all County residents as a result of savings.
· Waste tire recycling program
· Safe garage program
· Bulky waste collection
$86,ooo/yr
Dear
Thank you for your recent phone call regarding the closure of the Winterpock dump site.
We understand your concerns which were taken into account while making this difficult
decision.
The recommendation to close the facility was based on a variety of factors that benefit
the majority of Chesterfield County citizens. First, the cost of the facility compared to its
revenues are too enormous for the county to bear (see attached handout). There is a loss of
$86,000/year at the Winterpock site. Funds which are saved will help defray the costs of other
county programs, such as:
Waste Tire Recycling
Expansion of Curbside Recycling
Bulky Waste Pick-Up (appliances, furniture, etc.)
"Safe Garage" Program for disposal of paints, thinners, lubricants, oils, etc.
It should be noted that there is no other site in Chesterfield County which services a
particular segment of the population. The entire county is serviced by the northern transfer site
on Warbro Rd. which is approximately 12 miles driving distance and the southern transfer site
on Route 10 which is approximately 15 miles driving distance.
At one time there were no alternative services provided to your area because of its rural
nature. There are now alternative services provided by commercial haulers (See attached list).
For your convenience the county also provides a once a month pick up service for $1.00/bag or
container; please call 748-1219 for information and assistance.
Thank you for your concern and understanding.
Sincerely,
Fran Pitaro
Refuse Company Phone Number Frequency Cost
B.F.~L $15.95 per month
~222-7070 Weekly
2490 Charles City Road $18.45 can included
Richmond, VA 23231
Waste - Management $18.25 per month
~748-3682 Weekly
1405 Gordon Avenue $18.95 can included
Ricl-amond, VA 23224
A & B Trash Serv/ce $15.95 per month
~320-6862 Monthly
8507 Dwayne Lane $18.45 can included
Richmond, VA 23235
Chesterfield Disposal, Inc. $14.75 per month
~796-9794 Weekly
14308 Vonda Court $17.00 can included
Chester, VA 23831
Ollie Snead
~/84'5732 Weekly $18.00 per month
P.O. Box 161
Manakin-Sabot, VA 23 103
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Page 1 of --2
Meeting Date: June 14, 1995
Item Number: 9.A.
Report On:
Developer Water and Sewer Contracts
Background:
The Board of Supervisors has authorized the COunty Administrator to
execute water and/or sewer contracts between the County and the
Developer where there are no County funds involved.
The report is submitted to the Board members as information.
Summary of Information:
The following water and sewer contracts were executed by the County
Administrator:
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
93-0045
First Pentecostal Church of Richmond -
Pickens Road
First Pentecostal Church of Richmond, Trustees
Preston Mitchell Contractors
Water Improvements -
Dale
$10,845.00
County Administrator:
Attachments:
Prepared By:
Yes
#
No
109
Agenda Item
June 14, 1995
Page 2
o
Contract Number:
Project Name:
Developer:
Contractor:
Contract Amount:
District:
94-0099
Bellgrade Retirement Community - Polo Parkway
Bellgrade Retirement Community, L.C.
W. E. Duke and Sons, Inc.
Water Improvements -
Midlothian
$26,619.00
-,
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page i of 1
REPORTS
June 14, 1995 Item Number: ~.B.
Report On:
Status of General Fund Balance, Reserve for Future
Capital Projects, District Road and Street Light Funds,
Lease Purchases; and School Board Agenda
County Administrator:
Attachments: Yes
~-~ No
111
BOARD
MEETING
DATE
07/01/94
07/27/94
11H2~4
11/22/94
01/25/95
04/26/95
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
GENERAL FUND BALANCE
May 31, 1995
DESCRIPTION
FY95 Beginning Fund Balance
Fund Economic Market Analysis and
Survey for Central Area Plan
Transfer Excess Fund Balance (Above
7.5% of FY95 Expenditures) to the
Reserve for Future Capital Projects
Appropriation of fund balance to
transfer excess FY94 actual state sales
tax to schools
Creation of 3 Firefighter/Advanced Life
Support positions for Bensley/Bermuda
volunteer Rescue Squad
Greater Richmond Community Corps.
AMOUNT
(38,000)
(3,100,000)
(27,083)
(92,900)
(30,000)
BALANCE
$24,971,033
24,933,033
21,833,033
21,805,950
21,713,050
21,683,050
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
RESERVE FOR FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS
TRADITIONALLY FUNDED BY DEBT
May 31, 1995
Board
Meeting
Date
11/22/89
12/13/89
06~0/90
06/13/90
06/27/90
06/27/90
Description
FY89 Excess revenue
FYU0 Budgeted addition
Designation from June 30, 1989
Fund Balance
Purchase of land-Cogbill Road
Purchase building at 6701 West
Krause Road
Budgeted addition of excess
revenue
Purchase medical building for
future library site
Funds to purchase land for park
on Lake Chesdin
Budgeted but not appropriated funds
to purchase land for school
and park sites
Amount
$2,119,900
$1,881,500
$1,500,000
($630,000)
($400,000)
$2,100,000
($735,000)
($600,000)
($2,000,000)
Balance
$2,119,900
$4,001,400
$5,501,400
$4,871,400
$4,471,400
$6,571,400
$5,836,400
$5,236,400
$3,236,400
FOR FISCAL YEAR '91 BEGINNING JULY 1. 1990
12/12/90 Fill dirt for cover repair at Fort
Darling Landfill
06/30/91 Budgeted addition from FYUl
revenues
($180,000)
$4,000,000
$3,056,400
$7,056,400
rfcip.wk4
ii3
03/13/91
Designated but not appropriated
funds to cover construction
contract for MH/MR/SA building
if bonds are not sold in
fall, 1991
($1,806,800)
$5,249,600
FOR FISCAL YEAR '92 BEGINNING JULY 1. 1991
07/01/91
Regional Jail Authority as
approved in the FY92 Adopted
Budget (which will be reimbursed)
08/28/91
Provide funding for improvements
at Northern Area Landfill
to allow reallocation of
General Fund dollars to recycling
programs
08/28/91
Additional funding for Bon Air
Library expansion
08/28/91
Add back MH/MR building funds
which were previously deducted
for construction
11/27/91
Appropriated funds for T.V.
arraignment equipment but holding
in reserve account until prices
and all costs are confirmed
03/27/92
Add back funds previously deducted
to purchase land for school
and park sites
03/27/92
Funds designated for interest
cost in FY94 due to accelerated
1988 School bond issue
04/08/92
12/14/94
Designated funds for Center-
Pointe Fire Station construction
in FY95
($1,000,000)
($315,000)
($275,500)
$1,806,800
($115,000)
$2,000,000
($1,400,000)
($2,314,800)
$4,249,600
$3,934,600
$3,659,100
$5,465,900
$5,350,900
$7,350,900
$5,950,900
$3,636,100
rfcip.wk4
114
FOR FISCAL YEAR '93 BEGINNING JULY 1. 1992
04/08/92
FY93 budget addition
04/O8/92
FY93 Capital Projects (revenue
sharing roads $500,000; indus-
trial access $300,000; drainage
$200,000)
04/08/92
Funds to convert Meadowdale
Boulevard building into Hopkins
Road Library
04/08/92
Funds to construct lights along
portions of Jefferson Davis Hwy
05/13/92
Funding for emergency access for
Millside subdivision contingent
upon necessary right-of-way
acquisition
07/22/92
Funding for design phase of Jail
Annex
07/22/92
Funds to purchase Castlewood
08/31/92
Budget Change Request to fund
wetland study of property on
Cogbill Road
09/09/92
Supplement to finish improvements
to intersection of River and
Walkes Quarter roads
09/09/92
Funds for Charter Colony Parkway
09/09/92
Sidewalk at Enon Library
11/12/92
11/24/92
Designated and appropriated, if
needed, funds to cover shortfall
in construction of Public Safety
Training Building
Increase from FY92 Results of
Operations
$2,600,000
($1,000,000)
($1,386,500)
($500,000)
($80,000)
($500,000)
($315,000)
(sin,000)
($13,400)
($140,000)
($20,000)
($326,000)
$661,550
$6,236,100
$5,236,100
$3,849,600
$3,349,600
$3,269,600
$2,769,600
$2,454,600
$2,440,600
$2,427,200
$2,287,200
$2,267,200
$1,941,200
$2,602,750
rfcip.wk4 :1.15
12/fi9/92
Unappropriated funding for TV
arraignment
$115,000
$2,717,750
12/09/92
12/09/92
12/09/92
06/30/93
06/30/93
Appropriated $1,941,200 balance
plus $661,550 addition from FY92
ending fund balance and use of funds
previously appropriated for TV
arraignment $115,000 for Jail Annex
Unappropriated funds from 11/12/92
appropriation for construction
of Public Safety Training
Building
Appropriated to cover shortfall
in construction of Jail Annex
Enon Library Sidewalk-
project complete
Funds which were not needed for the
Public Safety Training Building.
Interest on the bonds was
sufficient to cover this appro-
priation.
($2,717,750)
$139,980
($139,980)
$13,401
$186,020
$0
$139,980
$0
$13,401
$199,421
FOR FISCAL YEAR '94 BEGINNING JULY 1. 1993
05/12/93
Appropriated FY94 funds for Cedar
Springs Rural Road addition (FY94
Secondary Road Improvement)
07/01/93
FY94 Budgeted Addition
07/01/93
FY94 Capital Projects
07/28/93
Appropriated funds to cover entire
cost of Keithwood/Hylton Park
Drainage project.
08/25/93
Supplemental revenue sharing match
for FY93 to fund Ledo Road
($35,000)
$3,500,000
($2,793,000)
($8o0oo)
($200,000)
$164,421
$3,664,421
$871,421
$790,721
$590,721
ffcip.wk4
116
09/08/93
10/13/93
11/23/93
12/15/93
04/27/94
04/27/94
05/25/94
05/25/94
06/08/94
06/08/94
04/12/95
06/22/94
Supplemental appropriation for
Charter Colony Parkway
Transfer for Northern Area
Landfill
Transfer from fund balance as per Section 18 of the
FY94 Appropriations Resolution
Transfer for Phase I development
of the Warbro Road Athletic
Complex
Designation for John Tyler
committment pending decision
on Bond Referendum date.
Reduce designation for John
Tyler Community College by
$49,400 to $2,220,321
Designate funds in order to
begin advance work needed to con-
struct the Christmas Mother and
County Warehouse (These funds
will be returned after July 1)
Reduce designation for John
Tyler Community College by
$500,000 to $1,720,321
Transfer funds to begin repairs
on the Ettrick/Matoaca and
LaPrade branch libraries
Release funds designated for
John Tyler Community College
Health Center Commission for
new nursing home facility
Transfer to Midlothian Branch
Library to fully fund project
($91,O00)
($370,000)
$2,800,000
($660,000)
($2,269,721)
$49,400
($49,400)
$500,000
($500,000)
$1,720,321
($1,000,000)
($490,100)
$499,721
$129,721
$2,929,721
$2,269,721
$0
$49,400
$0
$500,000
$0
$1,720,321
$720,321
$230,221
rfcip.wk4
117
FOR FISCAL YEAR '95 BEGINNING JULY 1. 1994
0'7/01/94
07/01/94
07/01/94
07/27/94
09/20/94
09/28/94
11/22/94
02/22/95
03/22/95
04/12/95
04/12/95
04/12/95
04/12/95
04/12/95
FY95 Budgeted Addition
FY95 Capital Projects
Return funds advanced
to begin construction on
Christmas Mother
Warehouse.
Transfer to Clover Hill Sports
Complex
Return unused funds from
Meadowdale Library Project
Transfer for LaPrade, Ettrick-
Matoaca Branch Libraries
Renovation
Transfer from Fund Balance as
per Section 18 of the FY95
Appropriations Resolution
Transfer to purchase land and
and building within the county
complex
Transfer for preparation of
construction plans to rebuild
Woolridge Road
Third ballfield at Warbro Complex
Health Center Commission for
new nursing home facility
Allocations planned for FY96 Budget:
(Effective July 1, 1995)
Additional Transfer to Schools
For Use by County
Addition to Fund Balance
$4,850,000
($3,675,000)
$49,400
($200,000)
$11,936
($160,000)
$3,100,000
($152,000)
($300,000)
($150,000)
(1,500,000)
(1,205,600)
(475,700)
(230,000)
$5,080,221
$1,405,221
$1,454,621
$1,254,621
$1,266,557
$1,106,557
$4,206,557
$4,054,557
$3,754,557
$3,604,557
$2,104,557
$898,957
$423,257
$193,257
rfcip.wk4
11S
04/12/95
04/12/95
04/12/95
05/10/95
07/01/95
FY96 Budgeted Addition
FY96 Capital Projects
County uses for capital purchases
Return of unused funds from
Warehouse (project complete)
Supplemental revenue sharing
match for road projects up to
a maximum of $50,000
6,400,000
(5,494,700)
(400,000)
14,525
(50,000)
$6,593,257
$1,098,557
$698,557 *
$713,082
$663,082
These funds are not available for use until July 1, 1995.
rfcip.wk4
Prepared by
Accounting Department
May 31, 1995
Date
Began
12/88
03/89
10/92
10/92
1 O/92
09/93
12/93
SCHEDULE OF CAPITALIZED LEASE PURCHASES
Description
APPROVED AND EXECUTED
Airport State Police
Hangar Additions
County Warehouse
Total
Geographic Information
System ("GIS") -
Automated Mapping
System
School Copier
School Copier
School Copier
School Copier
Real Property Lease/
Purchase
TOTAL APPROVED
AND EXECUTED
Original Date
Amount Ends
128,800
331,200
460,000
3,095,000
22,797
23,322
18,750
36,605
17,510,000
$21,166,474
12/00
3/98
9/97
10/97
10/97
8/98
12/01
Outstanding
Balance
05/31/95
78,493
201,838
280,331
1,320,000
11,841
12,967
10,490
26,503
14,575,000
$16,237,132
PENDING APPROVAL AND/OREXECUTION
None
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA
June 13, 1995
School Administration Building
The Public Meeting Room
9901 Lori Road
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
5:00 p.m.
7:30 p.m.
Bo
SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS
Marshall W. Trammell, Jr.- Chairman, Bermuda
Harry A. Johnson, Ed.D.- Vice-Chairman, Matoaca
Elizabeth B. Davis, Dale
Diaune E. Pettitt, Clover Hill
James R. Schroeder, D.D.S., Midlothian
Thomas R. Fulghum, Superintendem
AGENDA
$:00 P.M.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
SUPERINTENDENT'S CONFERENCE ROOM
7:30 P.M.
REGULAR SCHOOL BOARD MEETING
Call to Order, Roll Call, Flag Salute - Mr. Trammell, presiding
Cub Scout Pack 883 - Den 2
Acceptance of Minutes
May 19, 1995 (Work Session)
May 23, 1995 (Regular Meeting)
Agenda Approval
Awards and Recognitions
#97 Divisionwide Recognition Part II
#98 Resolution Recognition - Pat Noble
#99 Resolution Recognition - Nettie Mosby
Superintendent's Report
#92 Gifted Education Advisory Committee Annual Report
H.
I.
J.
K.
Action Items
1. Consent Agenda
Human Resources
//94 Recommended Personnel Action for 1994-95
Instruction
#101 Approval of Special Education Advisory Committee Members (1995-96)
Operations and Finance
#96 FY1995 Year End Review of the Financial Status of the School Capital
Improvements Fund
#100 Approval of Renewal of Vehicle Maintenance Contract for 1995-1996
Non-Agenda Items
Discussion Agenda.
(No public testimony will be accepted on discussion agenda items.)
Announcements, Communications, School Board Comments
Executive Session (personnel, legal, land/property acquisition, discipline)
Adjournment
General Information
The Chesterfield County School Board will meet as follows for the 1994-1995 school year:
July 20, 1994; August 9, 1994; September 13 and 27, 1994; October 11 and 25, 1994; November 8,
1994; December 13, 1994; January 10 and 24, 1995; February 14 and 28, 1995; March 14 and 28,
1994; April 11 and 25, 1995; May 9 and 23, 1995; and June 13 and 27, 1995. The executive
sessions/work sessions will begin at 5:00 p.m. and will be held at the School Administration Building,
9900 Krause Road, Chesterfield, Virginia. The regular meetings will begin at 7:30 p.m. and will be
held at the Public Meeting Room, 9901, Lori Road, Chesterfield, Virginia. If the place or time is
changed, the public will be notified.
Following is the procedure by which the public may speak before the School Board at any of
the above meetings:
Persons wishing to be heard on action items must notify the Superintendent's office by
2:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting.
Persons who have requested to offer public testimony will be heard when each item is
considered.
Persons to be heard on non-agenda items will be heard during the specified section of
the meeting.
It is requested that an individual conduct his/her presentation in three minutes;
representatives of a group may speak for five minutes.
Public delegations. Public delegations or their representatives are required to submit
in writing their request for hearing and their proposals to the Superintendent at least
five days prior to the meeting at which they wish to be heard.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
REPORTS
Page
]_ ofl
Meeting Date: June 14 e 1995
Item Number: 9. c.
Report On:
Roads Accepted into the State Secondary System
County Administrator:'
Attachments:
Yes
~--] No
0 ~
E~
· 0
0
· 0
C
0
0
C
· 0
0 3
· 0
0 ~
·
0
C
0 4a
c:
0
0
0 o
t--
C
C
0 .~
C
0
r~ c
-e o
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1401 EAST BROAD STREET
RICHMOND, 23219-1939
June 5,1995
Ms. Terry Pitts
Clerk of the Board Of Supervisors, Chesterfield County
P. O. Box 40
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832
JAMES S. GIVENS
STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER
Ref.: Report of Changes to the Secondary System of State Highways
Additions Made Effective in May 1995
Dear Members of the Governing Body:
The enclosed report represents all changes to the secondary system of state
highways, within your jurisdiction, that were made effective during May 1995.
Additions of these new roads were made under the Department's accelerated
acceptance process. Any faults found in the additions documents that require your
assistance to correct will be brought to your attention as necessary.
New road additions are now an official part of the secondary system of state
highways and the resident engineer has been notified to begin maintenance of these
new roads. If you have any questions regarding this material, please call this office at
(804) 786-2746 or your local resident engineer.
Sincerely yours,
Givens
State Secondary Roads Engineer
CC:
District Administrator
Resident Engineer
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
June 14, 1995 Item Number:
Page 1 of 1
to.g.
Subject:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Summary of Information:
Executive Session, pursuant to § 2.1-344A.7, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for
consultation with legal counsel relating to Douglas v. County of Chesterfield and Biron v.
County of Chesterfield.
Steven L. Micas
Attachments:
Yes [~ No
Title:
County Attorney
0800:10398.2
#
MOTION:
SECOND:
DATE:
RE: CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
~ELD IN CONFORMANCE WITH LAW
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the
Board, and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS,' the Virginia Freedom of information Act effective
July 1, 1989, provides for certification that such Executive
Session was conducted in conformity with law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the. Board of County
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of each
member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully
exempted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of
Information Act were discussed in the Executive Session to
which this certification applies, and ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the Motion by which the
Executive Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this certifi-
cation.
Vote: (by roll call)
The Board being polled, the vote was as followS:
AYES:
HAYS:
ABSENT DURING VOTE:
ABSENT DURING MEETING:
**CERTIFIED**
CLERK TO THE BOARD
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
June 14, 1995 Item Number:
Page 1 of ~
ADDITION
10 .B.
Subject:
EXECUTIVE SESSION
County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator: ~
BoardAction Requested:
Summaryoflnformation:
Executive session, pursuant to § 2.1-344(A)(3), Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, for consultation
with legal counsel regarding acquisition and conveyance of real estate for a public purpose in the
Dale Magisterial District.
Preparer: %~~", ~~-~,-d
Steven L. Micas
Attachments:
Yes [~ No
Title:
County Attorney
0800:10577.1
MOT ION
SECOND
DATE:
RE: CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
HELD IN CONFORMANCE WITH LAW
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has this day adjourned
into Executive Session in accordance with a formal vote of the
Board, and in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS,' the Virginia Freedom of Information Act effective
Ju].y 1, 1989, provides for certification that such Executive
Session was conducted in conformity with law.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the-Board of County
Supervisors does hereby certify that to the best of each
member's knowledge, i) only public business matters lawfully
exempted from open meeting requirements under the Freedom of
Information Act were discussed in the Executive Session to
which this certification 'applies, and ii) only such public
business matters as were identified in the Motion by which the
Executive Session was convened were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board. No member dissents from this certifi-
cation.
Vote: (by roll call)
The Board being polled, the vote was as follows:
AYES:
MAYS:
ABSENT DURING VOTE:
ABSENT DURING MEETING:
**CERTIFIED~*
CLERK TO THE BOARD
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
Meeting Date: June 14, 1995 Item Number: ~_4 .A.
Subject:
Resolution recognizing the Appomattox Trust for their contribution to Chesterfield County by
naming them the Chesterfield County Developer of the Year.
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator: .~~
Board Action Requested:
Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors confirm the selection committee's designation of the
Appomattox Trust as the Developer of 1995 and adopt the attached resolution.
Summary of Information:
Based upon the Board's approved Business Appreciation Award criteria, the Board gives four
awards a year, one each to Large, Medium and Small Business, and one to the Developer of the
year. The committee submits the Appomattox Trust for your approval as the recipient of
Chesterfield's 1995 Development Business Appreciation Award. The Appomattox Industrial
Center developed by the Trust has been an outstanding contributor to the County within their
respective category, particularly during the current fiscal year. The completion of Hill PHOE-
NIX, the relocation of Herald Pharmacal, and the recent acquisition by Carter-Wallace are the
recent projects which have located within Appomattox Industrial Center. Each of these projects
are significant in terms of expansion capabilities and job growth potential. The Trust was instru-
mental in our success to locate both Hill PHOENIX and Carter-Wallace.
AG5MY122/jal
Preparer: ~~.~rZ~/~ ~/ff/-~//fj L~_/]~/I..._~. Title: Director
(~ /Gary"'l~. Mc'L3Ien
# 131
Attachments: ll Yes [--] No
Resolution Recognizing the Appomattox Trust
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors established a
quarterly Business Appreciation and Recognition Award to recognize existing
businesses within the County that contribute to the County by providing tax
revenues and jobs for the citizens; and
WHEREAS, the County determined that under this program it should also
recognize annually the critical importance of planned developments in the
attraction of industry and business, and
WHEREAS, the Appomattox Industrial Center developed by the Appomattox
Trust has recently celebrated its 8th anniversary in Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the Appomattox Trust through its investment in and committment to
the Appomattox Industrial Center provided a developed site which assisted the
County in securing the location of Hill PHOENIX Inc., a $20 million investment
on a 50 acre site, which will provide 500 jobs; and
WHEREAS, the Appomattox Trust was instrumental in the original location of
Safetex which was recently purchased by Carter-Wallace and has sold an
additional 12 acres for the expansion of Safetex, thereby making additional
investment and employment possible at Safetex, and
WHEREAS, the development has also become the recent home to Herald
Pharmacal, Inc., a rapidly growing company manufacturing skin care products in
a 50,000 sq. ft. facility, and
WHEREAS, the development of Appomattox Industrial Center has led to the
direct investment of over $25 million in land buildings and equipment, and in
employment exceeding 750 in four industries, and
WHEREAS, the recent industrial expansons in Appomattox Industrial Center
have provided national exposure for Chesterfield County's business recruitment
effort; and
WHEREAS, the Appomattox Trust is community minded and has sought to foster
a high quality image, has adopted covenants that will assure quality industrial
development through architectural and land development standards.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of
Supervisors hereby expresses its gratitude on behalf of the County to the
Appomattox Trust for their contributions over the many years.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors expresses its
appreciation to the Appomattox Trust for their contributions by recognizing them
as the 1995 Developer recipient of the Chesterfield County Business
Appreciation and Recognition Award.
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
June 14, 1995, 7: 00 p.m. Item Number:
Page ~ of ~
14 .B.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing the Chesterfield Emergency Planning
Committee for its Invaluable Assistance to the County and
its Citizens
Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAcfion Requested:,
The Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors adopt a
resolution recognizing the Chesterfield Emergency Planning
Committee
Summary of Information:
The Chesterfield Emergency Planing Committee was established in
February, 1988; The Committee is made up of representatives from
Law Enforcement, Emergency Services, Firefighting, Rescue,
Hospitals, Print Media, Community Groups and Owners and Operators
of County industrial facilities. The Chesterfield Emergency
Planning Committee has been very supportive and instrumental in
emergency preparedness for the citizens of Chesterfield County.
Chief Robert L. Eanes, Emergency Services Coordinator, and Lynda
Furr, Assistant Emergency Services Coordinator, will be present
for the recognition.
Preparer: ~~~j,~-~
RObe~rt L. Eanes 5/1/95
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
Title:
Emergency Services Coordinator
RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE CHESTERFIELD EMERGENCY PLANNING
COMMITTEE FOR ITS INVALUABLE ASSISTANCE TO
THE COUNTY AND ITS CITIZENS
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Emergency Planning Committee was formed according to Federal
law, Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986, known as the "Community Right
To Know Act" and was established in February, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Emergency Planning Committee is made up of representatives
from Elected Officials, Law Enforcement, Emergency Services, Firefighting, Rescue, Hospitals,
Print Media, Community Groups, and Owners and Operators of County industrial facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Emergency Planning Committee is one of the most active
Committees in the State of Virginia, and has been very supportive and instrumental in
developing the annual Emergency Operations Plan and its training exercises; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Emergency Planning Committee has devoted many hours of
volunteer time to emergency planning and preparedness, for hazardous chemicals incidents, and
any other hazards that could be present during emergencies in the County; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Emergency Planning Committee has developed a community
outreach brochure on chemical emergency preparedness; has produced five, thirty second public
service videos on emergency preparedness; and has developed a generic emergency response
plan as a model for use by small to medium size industries; and
WHEREAS, the Chesterfield Emergency Planning Committee has contributed continued
support and collected funding to assist the County with emergency preparedness.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors
hereby recognizes the Chesterfield Emergency Planning Committee and expresses its
appreciation for its invaluable assistance to the County and its citizens.
135
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
June 14,~ Item Number:
Page ~of----~
14 .C.
Subject~:
Resolution Proclaiming June 19, 1995 as "Richmond Metropolitan Habitat for Humanity Day in the
County of Chesterfield."
Count~' Administrator's Comments_:
CountyAdministrator: ~
BoardAction Requested:
Adoption of the Resolution Proclaiming June 19, 1995 as "Richmond Metropolitan Habitat for
Humanity Day in The County of Chesterfield."
Summary of Information:
The Richmond Metropolitan Habitat for Humanity is an affiliate of Habitat for Humanity
International which is dedicated to providing simple, decent housing for low income families. The
Richmond affiliate has built 32 houses in the City of Richmond, 2 in Henrico County, and will be
expanding its program by building its first house in Chesterfield County at 2966 Brentwood Circle in
the Bensley community, Bermuda magisterial district.
A task force made up of County citizens and County staff has been working to locate a building site,
procure sponsorship for the effort, secure donations of materials and supplies, and identify
volunteers to assist in construction. A Community Development Block Grant made possible the
purchase of the land. The construction of the house will begin on June 19, 1995, and that day will
be proclaimed as "Richmond Metropolitan Habitat for Humanity Day in The County of
Chesterfield."
Members of the task force will be present at the June 14, 1995 meeting and Mr. Sidney HarrisOn,
resident of the Bermuda district and President of Industrial TurnAround Corporation, the sponsor of
the Chesterfield House, will receive the proclamation.
Preparer:
Frederick W. Willts~r.
Attachments: Yes
No
Title:
Director, Department of
Human Reso[llrC~ Management
# 136
Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia
Proclaiming June 19, 1995 as "Richmond Metropolitan Habitat for
Humanity Day in the County of Chesterfield."
WHEREAS:
Richmond Metropolitan Habitat for Humanity builds simple, decent
houses in partnership with low-income families and volunteers from
throughout the larger Richmond community, and
WHEREAS:
To date, Richmond Habitat has completed 34 houses in the
Richmond communities of Randolph, Church Hill, Newtowne West
and Newtown South and in Henrico County, and
WHEREAS:
Richmond Habitat is expanding its building ministry into the
County of Chesterfield with the construction of its first house
in the County as part of its Building on 95 in '95 project, and
WHEREAS:
A Task Force of County citizens has been working to locate land,
materials, and volunteers to initiate the building of its first house
and to lay the groundwork for future houses, and
WHEREAS:
Industrial TurnAround Corporation will sponsor this house by providing
the skilled construction supervision, materials, services and funds;
and Reynolds Metals Company and E.I. Du Pont will provide selected
materials, and
WHEREAS:
A Community Development Block Grant from Chesterfield County made
possible the purchase of the land upon which this house will be built,
and
WHEREAS: On June 19, 1995 the construction of this house will commence at
2966 Brentwood Circle in the Bensley community:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS commends Richmond Metropolitan Habitat for
Humanity for their commitment to improving housing conditions in the
metropolitan region and welcomes their expansion into Chesterfield County, and
hereby proclaims June 19, 1995 as:
"RICHMOND METROPOLITAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DAY
IN THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD."
RICHMOND METROPOLITAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP LIST
Duff Badgley
Sycamore Building Group
Cecil Chambers, Pastor
Branch's Baptist Church
Sheila Clasbey
Habitat for Humanity Site Selection Committee
James Daniels
Longest and Daniels, Realtors
Tim Grider, VP
Mike Dumont Construction Co., Inc.
Sidney Harrison, President
Industrial Turnaround Corp.
Ms. Ree Hart
Ampthill Civic Association
Frank McCormick, VP
Lawyers Title
M. D. "Pete" Stith, Deputy County Administrator/Community Development
Chesterfield County
Jay Stegmaier, Director
Dept. of Budget and Management
Chesterfield County
The Rev. Reginald D.Tuck, Pastor
Brandermill Church
F. W. "Rick" Willis, Jr., Director
Dept. of Human Resource Management
Chesterfield County
Tim Holtz, Executive Director
Richmond Metropolitan Habitat for Humanity5320 North Boulevard
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
June 14, 1995 Item Number:
Page 1 of ~-
14.D.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Robious Elementary School Fifth
Grade Students for Their Outstanding Representation of
Chesterfield County
CountyAdministrator:
County Administrator's Comments:
7~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary of Information:
Mr. Barber requests the Board adopt a resolution recognizing
Robious Elementary School fifth grade students for their
outstanding representation of Chesterfield County by
participating in the Junior American Citizen's Contest.
Teachers Rosa Noyes and JoAnn Arns and students of the their
class will be present to accept the resolution. See attached.
Preparer: ,~t, Og, a,~_~ ~ .~9~. L/?~x _
Theresa M. Pitts
Attachments:
Yes
~ No
Title: Clerk to Board of Supervisors
139
RECOGNIZING ROBIODS EL~)~ENTAR¥ SC~{OOn FIFTH GRADE STUDENTS
FOR T~EIR OUTSTANDING REPRESENTATION OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Robious Elementary School fifth grade
collaborative class of Mrs. Rosa Noyes and co-teacher, Mrs. JoAnn
Arns, entered a contest sponsored by the Society Daughters of the
American Revolution in the Group Special Projects Category; and
WHEREAS, this class project was entered in the Junior
American Citizen's Contest which follows the theme, "Waterways
Impact America"; and
WHEREAS, this class, composed of thirty
abilities ranging from gifted to those
disabilities, participated in the Contest; and
students with
with learning
WHEREAS, the entry by this fifth grade class received
recognition at the local level, qualifying it to compete in the
State competition; and
WHEREAS, the entry received first place in the State of
Virginia and was sent to the Eastern Divisional level which
included five states and Washington, D.C., where it was again
awarded first place and continued on to compete at the national
level; and
WHEREAS, at the national level, this entry was a winner and
ranks third in the nation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors extends its congratulations to Mrs. Rosa
Noyes, Mrs. JoAnn Ams, and their fifth grade class at Robious
Elementary School for their participation and recognition in the
Junior American Citizen's Contest and for their outstanding
representation of Chesterfield County.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors
acknowledges the contributions of the Robious Elementary School
students who participated in the Contest and to Mrs. Noyes and
Mrs. Arns for their dedication to teaching.
140
Meeting Date: June 14, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Item Number:
Page
14 .E.
,,Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Midlothian Middle School Lady
Mustangs Soccer Team for Their Outstanding
Accomplishments and Sportsmanship
County Administrator's Comments:
County Administrator:
BoardAction Re uested:
,Summaryoflnformation:
Mr. Barber has received a request for the Board to adopt a
resolution recognizing the Midlothian Middle School Lady Mustangs
Soccer Team for their outstanding accomplishments and
sportsmanship.
Mr. Eric Robinson, Team Coach, and Miss Elizabeth Vogelbach,
Miss Lynne Bowman, and Miss Meghan Estes, Team Captains, will be
present to accept the resolution. See attached.
Preparer: '~~9~ ,.~~
Theresa ~. Pi~ts
Attachments:
Title:
I #
Yes ~-~ No 141
RECOGNIZING THE MIDLOTHIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL
LADY MUSTANGS SOCCER TEAM FOR THEIR
OUTSTANDING ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND SPORTSMANSHIP
WHEREAS, participation in middle school sports has long been
an integral part of Chesterfield County's educational, physical,
and emotional development for students; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Eric Robinson, Coach of the Midlothian Middle
School Lady Mustangs Soccer Team, has been in the field of coaching
for the past twenty-two years; and
WHEREAS, under Mr. Robinson's guidance and direction, the 1995
Midlothian Lady Mustangs finished the regular season with a 10-0
record, won the County Tournament with a 13-0 record, and have
scored 183 goals in the last three seasons; and
WHEREAS, the Midlothian Lady Mustangs have a three year record
of 38-0-1; and
WHEREAS, the Captains of the Midlothian Lady Mustangs -- Miss
Elizabeth "Lizzie" Vogelbach; Miss Lynne "Domo" Bowman; and Miss
Meghan "Fries" Estes, and their teammates -- Miss Erin "Stork"
Crane; Miss Allison "Nadir" Dunning; Miss Mallory "Eddy" Harris;
Miss Katie "Kudu" Kelly; Miss Jenny "Chirp" Roberts; Miss Jennifer
"Juno" Snee; Miss Megan "Barker" Carney; Miss Megan "C.G."
Dickerson; Miss Dena "Dent" Floyd; Miss Christine "Trite"
Schnurmen; Miss Lauren "Ibex" Weidner; Miss Sommer "Gamy" Carlisle;
Miss Laura "Hardy" Garret; Miss Katie "Paddy" Katovsich; Miss Katie
"Achy" Keblusek; Miss Betty "Snare" Linkenauger; Miss Mary "Hammer"
Nichols; Miss Jenny "Rooty" Schockemoehl; Miss Amy "Lark" Smith;
Miss Heather "Jam" Voss; Miss Somer "Mint" Voss; Miss Lesley "Lox"
Miller; Miss Teresa "Yorkie" Justis; Miss Rebecca "Newel" Mathis;
and Miss Brittany "Savoy" Schaal have remained undefeated for the
past three seasons.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby commends the Midlothian Middle School
Lady Mustangs Soccer Team for their outstanding accomplishments and
splendid sportsmanship.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors, on
behalf of the citizens of Chesterfield County, hereby expresses
their best wishes for continued success to the Midlothian Lady
Mustangs.
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date:
Page 1 of~
June 14, 1995 Item Number: 14.G.
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Midlothian Youth Soccer League for Field
Improvements to Woodlake Athletic Complex
County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrat°r:
BoardAction Requested:
The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve a Resolution to
recognize the members of Midlothian Youth Soccer League for their
donation to improve the soccer fields at Woodlake Athletic
Complex by installing two (2) irrigation systems and purchasing
sprigs for turf rejuvenation.
Summary of Information:
Midlothian Youth Soccer League (MYSL) has graciously paid for the
installation of two (2) irrigation systems totaling $15,000 and
donated $1,850 towards the purchase of sprigs for these fields.
Their investment will go a long way in the effort to provide
young soccer players quality fields. The improved quality of
these fields will enhance the appearance of this facility,
provide a quality avenue for youth soccer players to develop, and
portrays Chesterfield County and the Parks and Recreation
Department as an agency striving to improve the quality of life
for its citizens and visitors.
Preparer: ,~~~~~ Title:
Michael S. Golden
Attachments:
Yes ~ No
Director
Parks and Recreation
# :1.4
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County and Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation
Department recognizes Midlothian Youth Soccer League for their donation of $16,850 for the
installation of two (2) irrigation systems and grass sprigs; and
WHEREAS, the addition of said improvements at Woodlake Athletic Complex will
further aide in the enhancement of tuff and facility; and
WHEREAS, the enhancements will aide in the further development of soccer skill for
the youth of Chesterfield County; and
WHEREAS, the enhancements will provide for a quality and safe field of play; and
WHEREAS, Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation greatly appreciates these and
past donations and looks forward to continuing a strong partnership with both co-sponsored and
non-co-sponsored organizations and association to further improve and enhance park and athletic
facilities of Chesterfield County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby express its
appreciation and gratitude to Midlothian Youth Soccer League for their generous contribution
toward field improvements at Woodlake Athletic Complex.
t.'.?. #,
Meeting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page
AGENDA
June 14, 1995 Item Number: 14.~.
of_L_
Subject:
Resolution Recognizing Pocoshock Valley Youth Soccer League for
Field Improvements to Providence Athletic Complex
County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator:
BoardAcfion Requested:
The Board of Supervisors is requested to approve a Resolution to
recognize the members of Pocoshock Valley Youth Soccer League for
their donation to improve the soccer fields at Providence
Athletic Complex by installing an irrigation system.
Summary o f Information:
Pocoshock Valley Youth Soccer League (PVYSL) has graciously paid
for the installation of an irrigation system totaling $4,700.
This is the fourth such irrigation system PVYSL has installed
Within the last 10 years. Their investments have gone a long way
and will continue to provide their young soccer players quality
fields. Their efforts and improvements to the facility have
enabled PVYSL to host the Columbus Day Soccer Tournament for nine
(9) consecutive years. Their continued investment and support to
improve this facility has enhanced its appearance, provided a
quality avenue for young soccer players to develop, and portrays
Chesterfield County and the Parks and Recreation Department as an
agency striving to improve the quality of life for its citizens
and visitors.
Preparer: ~~~._ Title:
Michael S. Golden
Attachments:
Director
Parks and Recreation
i # 149
Yes ~ No ,
W~EREAS, Chesterfield County and Chesterfield County Parks and
Recreation Department recognizes Pocoshock Valley Youth Soccer League
for their donation of $4,700 for the installation of an irrigation
system; and
W~EREAS, the addition of said improvements at Providence Athletic
Complex will further aide in the enhancement of turf and facility; and
WI{EREAS, the enhancements will aide in the further development of
soccer skill for the youth of Chesterfield County; and
W~EREAS, the enhancements will provide for a quality and safe field
of play; and
W}{EREAS, Chesterfield County Parks and Recreation greatly
appreciates these and past donations and looks forward to continuing a
strong partnership with both co-sponsored and non-co-sponsored
organizations and association to further improve and enhance park and
'TtL~.,~tic facilities of Chesterfield County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby
express its appreciation and gratitude to Pocoshock Valley Youth Soccer
League for their generous contribution toward field improvements at
Providence Athletic Complex.
.~ CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
Meeting Date: June x4 z995 Item Number:
Page 1 of 1
14.F.i.-3.
Sub'ect:~l ,
Resolutions Recognizing Boy Scouts Upon Attaining Rank
of Eagle Scouts
County Administrator's Comments:
CountyAdministrator: ,~
BoardAction Requested:
Summary of Information:
Staff has received requests for the Board to adopt
resolutions recognizing the following Boy Scouts upon attaining
rank of Eagle Scouts:
Dale District
· Mr. Jeffrey Robert Andersen, Troop 888, sponsored by Saint
Augustine's Catholic Church
Midlothian District
· Mr. David L. French, Troop 894, sponsored by Saint David's
Epiphany Church
Mr. David M. Honaker, Troop 897, sponsored by Mount Pisgah
United Methodist Church
They will be .present, accompanied by members of their
families, to receive the resolutions. See attached.
Preparer: ,j'~_~ ~'/7~. ~/0~
Theresa M. Pitts
Attachments:
Y~s
~ No
Title: Clerk to Board of Supervisors
# J.43
RECOGNIZING MR. JEFFREY ROBERT ANDERSEN UPON
HIS ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr.
William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a
wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a
troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living
up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Jeffrey Robert Andersen, Troop 888, sponsored by
Saint Augustine's Catholic Church, has accomplished those high
standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of
Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those
individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning
the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the
great accomplishments of his County, Jeffrey is indeed a member of
a new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be
very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr.
Jeffrey Robert Andersen and acknowledges the good fortune of the
County to have such an outstanding young man as one of its
citizens.
144
RECOGNIZING HR. DAVID L. FRENCH UPON
HIS ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr.
William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a
wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a
troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living
up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. David L. French, Troop 894, sponsored by Saint
David's Epiphany Church, has accomplished those high standards of
commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of Eagle Scout
which is received by less than two percent of those individuals
entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning
the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the
great accomplishments of his County, David is indeed a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be
very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr.
David L. French and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to
have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
145
RECOGNIZING MR. DAVID M. HONAKER UPON
HIS ATTAINING RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Mr.
William D. Boyce on February 8, 1910; and
WHEREAS, the Boy Scouts of America was founded to promote
citizenship training, personal development, and fitness of
individuals; and
WHEREAS, after earning at least twenty-one merit badges in a
wide variety of fields, serving in a leadership position in a
troop, carrying out a service project beneficial to his community,
being active in the troop, demonstrating Scout spirit, and living
up to the Scout Oath and Law; and
WHEREAS, Mr. David M. Honaker, Troop 897, sponsored by Mount
Pisgah United Methodist Church, has accomplished those high
standards of commitment and has reached the long-sought goal of
Eagle Scout which is received by less than two percent of those
individuals entering the Scouting movement; and
WHEREAS, growing through his experiences in Scouting, learning
the lessons of responsible citizenship, and priding himself on the
great accomplishments of his County, David is indeed a member of a
new generation of prepared young citizens of whom we can all be
very proud.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chesterfield County
Board of Supervisors hereby extends its congratulations to Mr.
David M. Honaker and acknowledges the good fortune of the County to
have such an outstanding young man as one of its citizens.
Me~ting Date:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA
J~ne 14, 1995 Item Number:
Page 1 of i
15.
ect:
HEARINGS OF CITIZENS ON UNSCHEDULED MATTERS OR CLAIMS
County Administrator's Comments..'
County Administrator:
BoardAction Requested:
Summary of Information:
Deborah K. Damerel, 416 Keithwood Court.
Staff has received a request from Mr. Russell C. Knapp to
address the Board regarding the appeal of violation of special
exception of a business in a residential area on behalf of Ms.
See attached.
Preparer: ~ ~/~. ~
Theresa M. Pitts
Attachments:
Y~s
~-~ No
Title: Clerk to Board of Supervisors
~.iDES-FIELD SE~VICEC:
TEL No.
3u.n 6,95 i6:SS No.O06 P.O
MR LAN~ RAMSEY
CHZSTERPIESD COUNTY
R~F~RRNCYi
BOARD 0~ SUPERVISORS
JUN~ 14, 1995 7,00
PUT MY NAME ON TH~ AGENDA OF THIS MEETING FOR THE PURPOSE
RESIDZNTAL AR~A ON BEHALP OF DZBORAH K. DAHEREL, 4~6 KEITHWOO£
~¥ NAM~ ANb ADDRSSS,
RUSSELL C. KNAPP
1801 W~LK~RTON ROAD
RICHI.IO~D~ VA 25236
(804) 276-6774
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
J.L. MCHALE, III, CHAIRMAN
BERMUDA DISTRICT
ARTHUR S. WARREN, VICE CHAIRMAN
CLOVER HILL DISTRICT ,
HARRY G. DANIEL
DALE DISTRICT
FREDDIE W. NICHOLAS, SR.
MATOACA DISTRICT
EDWARD B. BARBER
MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT
June 9, 1995
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
P.O. BOX 4O
CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 23832
(804) 748-1211
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
LANE B. RAMSEY
Mr. Russell C. Knapp
1801 Walkerton Road
Richmond, Virginia 23236
Dear Mr. Knapp:
Your request to address the Board of Supervisors under Hearings
of Citizens on Unscheduled Matters or Claims has been placed on
the agenda for June 14, 1995 at 7:00 p.m.
Under this category, the Board of Supervisors Rules of Procedure
require that the presentation of the claim not exceed thirty
minutes in total and each individual speaker will have five
minutes.
Persons appearing before the Board will not be allowed to:
(a) Campaign for public office;
(b) Promote private business ventures;
(c) Address matters within the administrative province of the
County Administration;
(d) Engage in personal attacks;
(e) Use profanity or vulgar language; or
(f) Speak to matters previously presented to the Board by the
speaker without the County Administrator,s recommendation.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Lane .~Ramsey
County Administrator
tp
Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service. ~:~