Loading...
75S144 Au~. st 27, 1975 (B.S.) CASE NUMBER: 75S144 APPLICANT: G. E. Miles and J. P. Spinner REQUEST: A Conditional Use to permit the construction of 7 duplex structures (14 dwelling units). PROPOSED USE: It is intended that the parcel be developed to accommodate 14 dwelling units. TAX MAP IDENTIFICATION: Bermuda Magisterial District, Refer to Quail Oaks, Section 1, Blk 6, Lots 17 and 18 (Sheet 23). GENERAL LOCATION: The parcel fronts the.north line of Brandywine Avenue south of the intersection of Pealock Road and Brandywine Avenue in Quail Oaks Subdivision. ACREAGE (SUBJECT PARCEL)~ 1.5 acres. EXISTING ZONING: Residential (R-7). EXISTING LAND USE (SUBJECT PARCEL): Vacant and partially wooded. ADJACENT AND AREA ZONING AND LAND USE: Ail adjacent property is zoned Residential (R-7). Adjacent property is either vacant or occupied by single family or duplex residences. UTILITIELS~ SOIL PROFILE: writing. Information not available at the time of this DRAINAGE AND EROSION~ REQUIRED OFF-SITE EASEMENTS: Although no specific report has been received by Planning Staff, preliminary discussions with the Engineering Department indicates that an erosion problem will result from the proposed development. It has been indicated that specific measures will be necessary in order to avoid these problems. In addition, off-site drainage easements will be necessary. The Engineering Department has also stated that they will provide the applicant with specific drainage and erosion control measures. PUBLIC FACILITIES: No particular impact relative to existing or future area public facilities is anticipated. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC: Development of the parcel for the use in- dicated will utilize a single access to Brandywine Avenue. GENERAL PLAN: Single family residential development for the area en- compassing the parcel. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: On May 16, 1972 and again on June 20, 1972 the applicants came before the Planning Commission requesting (case number 72-23U) that they be allowed to construct 71 apartment units on the subject parcel. The Commission after considerable discussion and debate, resolved that approval of the request be recommended to the Board of Supervisors subject to a number of conditions .being impcsed. However, in the face of heavey opposition, the applicaticn was with- drawn prior to a Board hearing of the request. At the Board meeting~~ ~it was stated that after discussions with the area property owners and residences of Quail Oaks Subdivision, the applicants agreed to withdraw the multi-family request subject to making reapplication for duplex use. Consequently, on March 7, 1973 the Board of Zoning Appeals resolved that Messers Miles and Spinner be permitted (Special Exception request number 73A034) to construct 7 duplex structures designed to address particular development problems and assure compatibility with existing and future area land use. On November 27, 1974, the Board of Supervisors, after a review by the Planning Commission, gave reconsideration to certain conditions imposed in the granting of the Special Exception (Case Number 73A034; March 7, 1973) by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The Supervisors resolved that exceptions to 6ondtiions 7 and 8 in the previously approved Special Exception be made as requested by the applicant and shown on the site plan submitted with the application. It was further resolved that all uni~ts would be constructed entirely of brick, and that drainage problems would be negotiated because of the applicant's delay in beginning construction that the original Special Exception expired. As noted in the past recommendations, Planning Staff is of the opinion that this Conditional Use should offer no detriment to the neighborhood provided maximum densities are kept at a reasonable level and certain conditions guaranteeing land use compatibility are imposed. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST C.P.C. 7 15 75: Approval of this Conditional Use request is recommended subject to the imposition of the following conditions: Each parking space shall be 10X20 feet in size. A minimum of two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided. All private drives, entrances and parking areas shall be paved. Driveways shall be at least 25 feet face of curb to face of curb utilizing curb and gutters. Ail structures~shall be separated by a minimum of 20 feet. Ail structures shall be a minimum of 20 feet from any property line with the exception of attached tool sheds which may project into the setback area. No more than 14 dwelling units shall be permitted to be constructed on the parcel in question. Fire hydrants shall be provided and located in accordance with a plan to be presented to and approved by, the Cou~ty Fire Administra- tion. The following fire prevention and safety measures shall be imposed: a. Ail roof coverings shall be of fire resistant materials Class C or better. Ail vertical walls separating dwelling units shall be constructed as fire walls. An approved smoke detection system shall be provided in each dwelling unit. Ail units shall be of brick construction. The above noted conditions notwithstanding the plan on file with the Planning Department prepared by Hankins and Anderson Consulting Engineers and dated 6/13/74, shall be considered the plan of development for the project. CASE HISTORY AND PAST COMMISSION AND BOARD ACTION FOR THIS REQUEST Applicant 8 19 75: Made formal request for a 120 day deferral (Dec.10, 1975) for~the hearing of the case. 75s144 Conditional Use Scale 1"=600' Sheet 2~ Z