The URL can be used to link to this page

09-22-71 PacketCOUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA Sep~ d~O, 1971 ~'~ ~' Dial 733-6802 Post Office Box 455 S~ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803 Sept. 8th, 1971. lvir. Floyd ~. Bowman; Chairman, Sanitary District, ¥~ater Division, Ettrick, Va. Dear l~r. Bowman :- gay we quote a price of $625.00 for repairing the road to the Ettrick Pumping Station. The operation will include placing B-1 Stone and shaping up the road with a motor grader, so that the road will drain to the ditch lines. Very truly yours, Southern Construction Co. ~y ~ ~'~ ~,,~./ ..... DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G, L. BAUGHAN, LURAY, VA. MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOLK, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R, GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. RUFUS T. HAIRSTON, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G, JANIXlEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 September lO, 19?l JOHN E. HARWOOD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J. V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS H, GORDON BLUNDON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING Secondary System Addition - Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 2B832 Gentlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board om July 14, 1971, the following addition to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County is hereby approved, effective July 1, 1971. ADDITION MEADOMDALE TOWN H~JSE PARK SUBDIVISION: Hokle Court - From its intersection with Meadowdale Boulevard northwardly 0.04 mile to a cul-de-sac. Copies: Mr. A. S. ~ttox Mr. P. B. Celdiron Mr. C. A. PaSmer Mr. L. R. Tre~t, Jr. Mr. L. H. D~wson, Jr. Mr. W. R. Davidson - Chesterfield ~ssioner A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G. L. BAUGHAN, LURAY, VA. MORRILL M, CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORTH. NORFOLK, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR,, McLEAN, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. RUFUS T. RAIRSTON, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G, JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA; 23219 September 13~ 1971 W. $. G. BRITTON, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J. V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS H. GORDON ~LUNDON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING Secondary System Addition - Chesterfield Couuty Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 2B8B2 Gentlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board om July 14, 1971, the following addition to the Secomdary System of Chesterfield Co~uty is hereby approved, effective Jul~l, 1971. ADDITION ~NGTH MAYFAIR BUBDMSION: Mayfair Drive - From its imtersectiomwith Route 2407 (Florence Ave.) northwestw~rdly 0.08 mile to a cul-de-sac. Copies: Mr. A. ~. Nattox Mr. P. B. Coldiron Mr. C. A. Palmer Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr. Nfo L. H. Dawson~ Jr, Mr. ~I. R. Davidson - Chesterfield A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G. L, BAUGHAN, LURAY, VA. MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOLK, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. RUFUS T. HAIRSTON, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 September lO, 19?l SIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER W. S. G. BRITTON, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSE~ERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J. V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS H. GORDON BLUNDON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING Secondary System Addition - Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virgimia 238~2 G~utlems~: As requested in resolution by your Board on July 14, 1971, the followLug addition to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County is hereby approved, effective July 1, 1971. ADDITI ON T Brandywine Avenue - From its intersection with Galena Road Route 144B) northwardly 0.18 mile to ~ingsdale Road Route 1495 ). ' 0.18 Mi. ~'~..~. E. Ha~d~ Deputy C ~"o~m~.ssioner Copies: Mr. A. S. Mattox Mr. P. B. Coldiron Mr. C.A. Palmer Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr. Mr. L. H. D~ws~n, Jr. Mr. W. R. D~vidson - Chesterfield A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G. L. BAUGHAN, LURAY, VA. MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOLK, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. RUFUS T. HAIRSTQN, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. :ALT H-- OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 September lO~ 1971 HARWOOD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J. V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS H. GORDON BLUNDOIXI, DIRECTOR O~: PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING Secondary System Additions - C~esterfield County Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 2B8B2 Gamtlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board on June 23, 1971, the foLl~ additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County are hereby approved, effective July l, 1971. ADDITI ONS T,~G~ c SUB, D V S ON SEC ON C: Salk Road - From Route 621 Southeast 0.08 mile to Celtic Road, thence Southeasterly 0.10 mile to Puritan Road, thence Northeasterly 0.11 mile to Route 655. 0.29 Puritan Road - From Salk Road Southeast 0.27 mile to cul-de-sac. 0.27 Mi. Physic Hill Road - From its intersection with Route 621 Eastwardly 0.08 mile to Celtic Road, thence 0.20 mile Eastwardly to cul-de-sac. 0.28 Mi. Celtic Road - From Salk Road Southwest 0.19 mile to Physic Hill Road. Copies: Mr. A. S. Mattox Mr. P. B. Coldiron Mr. C. A. Palmer Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr. Mr. L. H. Dawson, Jr. Mr. W. R. Davidmon- Chesterfield A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT Are you in favor of the neighborhood school concept? In order to preserve the neighborhood school concept do you favor an amendment to the U. S Constitution forbidding busing of students for the sole purpose of maintaining a racial balance? CHESTERFIELD COUNTY COUNCIL OF ~ugust _06, 1971 ~r. M. W. Burnett, Executive, Secretary Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett, The Chesterfield County Council of Parent Teacher Associations has asked that I write you and request that you inform the Chester- field County Board of Supervisors of our affirmation of continuing support as they and their attorneys represent the county during the current litigation. It is truly unfortunate that occurances such as the adverse publicity given our school administration l~st week can create such an uproar in our county, but a county divided would seem to be their obJec rive. ~hank you, Sincerely, Mrs. Lof Alley, President Chesterfield County Uouncil of Parent Teacher Associations 1_o330 Parker Lane Chester, Virginia 23831 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY 915 MUTUAL BUILDING * RICHAAON D, VIRGINIA 23219 TELEPHONE 649-8494 September 15, 1971 Honorable M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: We are pleased to enclose a copy of the Audit Report prepared by our certified public accountants, Arthur Young & Company. The report covers the year ended June 30, 1971 and sets forth the financial position of the Authority at that date. Your continued support of the Authority is appreciated. Sincerely, THE RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY Charles AL Tayior, ~airman RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~ND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1971 with REPORT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS CONTENTS Report of certified public accountants Financial statements Balance sheet Statement of changes in fund balances Statement of revenues and operating expenses Notes to financial statements Supplementary information Statement of cash receipts and disbursements Investments held by Trustee Schedule 1 2 ARTHUR YOUNg ~ CoMPaNY 801 EAST MAIN STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23:~19 The Board of Directors Richmond Metropolitan Authority We have examined the accompanying balance sheet of Richmond Metropolitan Authority at June 30, 1971 and the related statements of revenues and operating expenses and changes in fund balances for the year then ended. Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. In our opinion, the statements mentioned above present fairly the financial position of Richmond Metropolitan Authority at June 30, 1971 and its revenues and operating expenses and the changes in its fund balances for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis con- sistent with that of the preceding year. In making our examination we obtained no knowledge that the Authority failed to comply with any of the terms, covenants or con- ditions contained in the Trust Agreement. However, it should be understood that our examination was not directed primarily toward obtaining such knowledge. Our examination has been made primarily for the purpose of ex- pressing an opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information, although not considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position or results of operations, is presented for supplementary analysis purposes. It has been subjected to the tests and other auditing procedures applied in the examination of the financial statements mentioned above and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all respects material in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. July 23, 1971 RICHMOND ~ETROPOLITAN A~THORITY BALANCE SHEET june 20, 1971 contingenCY Revenue Fund Fund ~ _ $ 5,000 $ _ Reserve Fund $ 110,194 CaSh cash--held b~ trustee cash__constructiOn interest account depoS it Certificates of ' at cost - "= b" trustee, investmentS--hexu · ~ t approximately market at cos ! .~.structiOn investments ...... at cost, interest account, approximately market Accrued interest receivable Due from other funds prepaid expenses BouleV ar d br idgceour t --condemnat ions Deposits with Accumulated constructiOn costs (Note 3) 245,000 125,000 LIABILITIES AND FUND BAIANCE AccountS payable Accrued expenses, principally interest Due to City of Richmond (Note 4) Deferred income--tags Due to other funds Retained percentages on contracts Bonds payable, series 1971 (Note 5) Total liabilities Fund balance _ $ .$ 110,194 See accompanying noteS. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1971 Funds Construction Fund $ 114,469 1,073,807 6,169 100,000 17,344,961 Bridge Funds Revenue Reserve Construction Fund Fund Fund $ 32,836 $ Total 262,499 1,073,807 6,169 470,000 17,344,961 7,217,031 476,750 2,500 1,305,949 69,828 14,119 28,433~948 _ _ - $56,145,412 $ 46,955 $ _ $ _ 7,217,031 476,750 2,500 14,119 1,305,949 69,828 28,433,948 $56,677,561 $ 1,224,436 1,649,273 2,050,000 190,754 51,300,000 56,414,463 ( 269,051) $56,145,412 $ 8,286 $ 1,673 26,572 2,500 39,031 _ 7,924 _ $ 46,955 $ _ $ 1,232,722 1,650,946 2,050,000 26,572 2,500 190,754 51,300,000 56,453,494 224,067 $56,677,561 See accompanying notes. 0 I I 03;G3 O0 O0 I I00 ,,,J I I I mi. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OPERATING EXPENSES For the year ended .June 30, 1971 Revenues: Tolls Tags BRIDGE REVENUE FUND $ 53,003 6,024 8,195 7~544 27,300 8,224 1~516 $ 288,966 42~324 74,766 Operating expenses: Operations: Salaries and employee benefits Maintenance Equipment rental Other Administrative: Administrative fees--RMA Insurance Other Total operating expenses Excess of revenues over operating expenses* 37~ 040 $ 331,290 111,806 $ 219,484 *Before applying interest expense of $37 526 Fund. ' ' See Bridge Reserve See accompanying notes. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 1971 e Organization The Authority was created in 1966 by Act of the Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia. It is governed by a Board of Directors consisting of eleven members, six of whom are appointed by the Mayor of the City of Richmond, with the approval of the City Council, two each by the Boards of Supervisors of Henrico and Chesterfield Counties, and one ex-officio member appointed by the State Highway Commissioner. The organizational meeting of its first Board of Directors was held on July 15, 1966. The Authority will be responsible for construction of a toll expressway system to serve the Richmond metropolitan area. Expenditures made by the Authority for the expressway prior to placing it in service will be capitalized as cost of the project. In July 1969 the U. S. Department of Highways announced that the Beltline portion of the expressway would be included in the interstate system, and constructed by the Virginia Department of Highways (VDH). The VDH is purchasing from the Authority rights-of-way previously acquired by the Authority in this section and will reimburse it for some portion of the design costs. Accounting policies The accounts of the Authority are maintained on an accrual basis of accounting. Investments are stated at cost adjusted for amortization of discount and premium over the time re- maining to maturity. Cost of equipment is charged to con- struction costs at the time of purchase. No depreciation is recognized on the assets of the Authority. Accumulated construction cos ts Accumulated construction costs, net of interest earned, sales of property and other credits, at June 30, 1971 follow: RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 1971 (Continued) Amount Rights-or-'way, etc. Engineering Construction contracts General and administrative, etc. $16,413,304 5,228,014 1,902,578 4 ~890,052 $28 , 433,948 Pursuant to Section 8.13 of the trust agreement, the Authority sold, to the Virginia Department of Highways, rights- of-way which were not necessary for the project. (See Note 1) Proceeds from these sales amounting to $876,328 have been reflected in these statements as a reduction of cost of construction. Due to City of Richmond The Authority is obligated to repay the City of Richmond $2,050,000 without interest, from proceeds of future issuance of a second series of bonds. This represents $216,383 of preliminary expenditures made by the City for survey, engineer- ing studies, etc. and $1,833,617 advanced to the Authority by the City. Bonds payable Revenue bonds in a principal amount of $51,300,000 were issued under the terms of a trust agreement dated December 30, 1970. These bonds bear interest at the rate of 7% per annum and mature January 15, 2013. The trust agreement provides for the redemption of bonds, subject to certain requirements, prior to maturity. A portion of the proceeds from the bonds was used to pay temporary notes payable of $21,000,000 plus interest of the expressway construction fund and temporary notes payable of $1,200,000 plus interest of the bridge construction fund. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule 1 Balance, July 1, 1970 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS For the year ended June 30, 1971 payment Receipts: Toll revenues interest on investments Redemption of investments Balance returned by paying agent after of temporary notes Sale of series 1971 bonds Sales of land to Commonwealth of Virginia Transfers from bridge revenue fund Transfers from bridge reserve fund Other Expr~ ~~d Revenue Contingency Fun___Jd Fun~d m _ 100,000 m _ 100,00~00 - 100,000 Disbursements: Operating expenses Construction costs investments purchased Accrued interest purchased Transferred to paying agent for payment of temporary notes and interest Payment of note interest Payments made for bridge construction Transfers to bridge reserve fund Transfers to expressway reserve fund Other Balance June 30, 1971 Depositories: First and Merchants National Bank United Virginia Bank/State Planters Metropolitan National Bank Petty cash and change funds fund m 95,000 _ 95,00~ $ _ $ 5,000 5,000 5, oo__ _o Schedule 1 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS For the Year ended June 30, 1971 Funds Bridge Funds Reserve Construction Revenue Reserve Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund $ 144,506 $ 35,893 $ 67 106,000 4,194 110,194 110,194 $ 110,194 - 327,842 - 467,742 - 14,758 4,176,980 - 617 2,082,440 _ _ 50,321,595 _ _ 876,328 _ _ - - 33,516 74,668 _ _ 57,999,753 327,842 48,891 58,144,259 363,735 48,958 - 107,856 3,072,874 _ 28,606,315 _ 132,327 _ 23,931,201 _ 1,200,000 _ - 83,527 - 33,516 - 106,000 7,097 _ 56,949,814 330,899 $ 1,194,445 $ 32,836 44,764 4,194 48,958 $ - 110,194 $ 110,194 1,182,212 $ 8,300 12,183 _ - 22,526 50 2~010 $ 1,194,445 $ 32,836 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY INVESTMENTS HELD BY TRUSTEE June 30, 1971 Schedule 2 Description Face Interest ~mo~nt Maturity Rate Construction account: Federal Home Loan Bank Federal National Mortgage Association United States treasury Bills Certificates of deposit: Bank of Virginia Central National Bank Metropolitan National Bank United Virginia Bank/ Spotswood United Virginia Bank/ Fairfax United Virginia Bank/ State Planters 2,400,000 Bank of Virginia 1,000,000 Central National Bank 2,000 000 Southern Bank and ' Trust Company 500,000 Metropolitan National Bank 500,000 Bank of Virginia __~1,000,000 $17,310,000 Construction interest account: United States Treasury Bills $ 1,830,000 United States Treasury Bonds 308,500 Certificates of deposit: First National Exchange Bank--Roanoke i,000,000 Central National Bank 795 500 United Virginia Bank/ ' State Planters 795,500 Bank of Virginia 1,000,000 Bank of Virginia 1,000,000 Metropolitan National Bank 500,000 ~ 7,229,500 $ 2,280,000 1,230,000 600,000 1,000,000 2,300,000 1,O00,O00 500,000 1,000,000 7 -27 -71 12-11-71 8-12-71 1-15-72 1-15-72 1-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 1-15-73 7-8-71 12-15-72 1-10-72 1-10-72 7-10-72 7-10-72 1-10-73 1-10-73 7.50% 7.20% 5.05% 4.71% 5.05% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 5.30% 4.76% 4.75% 5.30% 5.30% 4. 625% 4.61% 4.75% 5.30% 5.30% 5.20% Cost Basis $ 2,285,937 1,263,441 595,583 1,000,000 2,300,000 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 2,400,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 500,000 500,000 __1,000~000 ~17,344,961 $ 1,828,267 297,764 1,000,000 795,500 795,500 1,000,000 1,000,000 ., 5q0~000 oYlYlONWEALTI+ OF VIRGINiA VIRGINIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY BOX 375S, Ur~IWERSI~Yr STA~IOlg C~.R~O~T~SV~, ¥-~. 22903 ~""°~"~-~' CHESTERFI ELD County Officers August 30, 1971 THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to submit to you a summary of fiscal matters, expended under Section 10-46 of the Code, between your County and the Virginia Division of Forestry for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1970 and ending June 30, 1971. The summary, according to our records, is as follows: Total land area of county ............... Privately-owned forest area in county... Maximum amount legally chargeable to county at rate of 1¢ per acre of forest land ........................... $ Charged to county for forest fire sup- pression, prevention & detection ...... $ 2~132.00 Amount of legally available county funds not used ........................ $ 0,00 Amount of State funds spent in county, including proportional part of district administrative cost .......... $ 27~237.09 During the fiscal year the forest fire record was as follows: Number of fires reported by forest wardens ........... Number of acres burned over .......................... Q~____acres 213~200 acres 322 ~ Should there be any questions concerning this report, please communicate with me. Please refer to my letter of April 15, 1968 in which you were advised of the forest land area based on the 1966 Federal-State Forest Survey. This is the forest acreage basis on which the current 1¢ per acre total is deter- mined. cc: [~rlr. G. ~'i. AugsburBer Mr. H. F. Hancock Very truly yours, LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY CIAIH INVESTIGATION REPORT DATE ~-&-71 I, Warden D. B. Watson . on this date investigated the claim of MR. C~l~_~ks ........... add, ss. Rt. 1 Bo~ l~ Chester*ie]d Va,, . ~ Domoni.qk~rs a~n'd ~ Game Roost.er . Hens l vt old 6lbs for .... 7no. Chickens~D'~criPti~'n'. (kine', age, W~ight) .... which occurred on .8r3-71 & ~-&-7~19 ..in Chesterfield County. I estimate value of $ 2.00. (HEN)each, total value $..~.~.OO · Authority ...... .......... '~ .00 (Rooster) Mr. JohnK Kvasnica of the So~thside Hatchery & F~¥m Supply in Petersburg ....................... I (~W~ did not) witness the actual (killing and/or maiming) of the animals claimed. The guilty (dog, d~s$ ~ave, h~m~~) been (caught, ~~) and are described as follows: Large ~emale German shepherd, B].a,~k..qDd ta,.n ~ ~ ~nlmF, ................................ Damage was done in the following manner: Chickgns' were shook to aeath. Some were partly chewed, ................................ As a result of maim~g' .... of the total claimed above were destroyed by the owner, or by me at the owner's request. Following are witnesses: ~. Cb~les Hnnks ..... Rt.,,~, BQ~ ~$ Cbe~terf~e,!d ....... I have investigated this claim as thoroughly as possible. .I (have, ~~ viewed the remains of the animals claimed. I (have, l~m~mm~) viewed the area where said animals were att-acked along with other physical evidence and I (have, ~ questioned available witnesses. Respectfuli~, D. B. Watson Sr. ' Room 1106, ~nth Street S.t:~N~ of.~ce Buildi~'~ Richmond, Virginia · ao~ Land Minimum Conditions for Aceo.?table. Co~trol Pro~ra.:u for Open Burni~ ~- "- Cica~rin~ Current State Air Pollution Cout'.rol Board Rule' 4 p~o!:ib~ts the open bu:n~ing of debris by land developers. A proposed amendment to ~his Rule would permit this type of homing, u,~Sar strict conditions~ for the re- mainder of 1971 only. Until this proposal has beeh formally acted on, the Board's staff will pc~nlt dew~lopers to bu:n a.f'~W~ submission of an acceptable control program, as prov.lded iu Rule 2. ~ais control progrm~ must state who is to ~o the borning~ wi',ere and when the burni~.~g w~].l t~ka place, aud the approxi~:~a~e a:~o~nt a~id type of material to [,a bu~ed, In addition, ~ statement must be iuaiuded that th'a foll~ing con~it~o.ns wi. Il Tru~-~ks of fei. led timber w~ Lh a dia~,~eter g~'eal:er than four (iD inches shall be cut i~to saw log: pulp wo:'.J, or' fire place length and dispos¢,.d of by means other ~'h.'_::~ open burning. Stumps to be bur:~-ad must conta:i:~ nD more than 2 feet of :rea trunk. 'ii~e location of <b.o b:~r:~i:S sha3i be uot clDser than {t'~e fol)~ow- ins limiCs~ 3000 fc~ frou any dwc, lii~S ].ec~ted in a pvedominaz!t.~ ly res~de~Cial area oilier ti~<,, n d~:,al]ing or s{;:ucto:o ].cas. ted "' ~ ' ' ' ~ :~i]e fro:: a major hi~j:,~;.~y as imlici:t:ed o:: Skai'e }[':Sl:,.~'ay map; and 5~ At no '' sb.=-,U' " f:N:c ,.. CH £STERF[ELD COUNTY CHESTERFIELD C. H.. VA. 23832 E. L. WIN'GO, SHERIFF September 20, 1971 Mr. M. W, Burnett Executive Secretary Chesterfield, Va. Dear Mr. Burnett: Will you please ask the supervisors to consider appropriating the amount of money necessary to purchase the jail clothes lis~ed on the attached requisition. I do not have enough money in my clothing budget to purchase them. Thank you. E. L. Wi COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA REQUISI.TION FOR PURCHASE REQUISITION NO, D^TE September 14 .~a,,7~,, THE EXECUTIVE SECRE'FARY: Office of The Sheriff EXEC. ~EC'Y 19 .... Attn: Mr. E, L. Wingo, Sheriff CODE DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLES , PT,WASE ORDER FOR CHESTERFIELD COUNTY JAIL 'Item Brown Denim Shirts - Size - -i4 15 16 Qty. - 1 doz. 2 doz. 1 doz. Stock ~ 593 item' "-Brown Denim Trousers Size - 28 30 32 - Stock ~ 56~ 34 ' Qty. -. 1 doz. Item Size Qty. Item Size Qty. 1 doz. 2 doz. 2 doz. 2 dc Blue Denim Shirts - Stock ~ 594 14 15 16 17 1-doz. 1 doz. 1 doz. '1 doz. Blue Denim Trousers - Stock # 568 28 3o 32 34 1 doz. 1 doz. 1 doz. 1 doz. 1 dc i te~ - Whi~e Cotton Shirt~6 . Size - 1~ 17 Qty. - ~ doz. ½ doz. ½ doz. ½ doz. Item - White Cotton Trousers Size - 28 30 32 .... 34 3~. Qty. - ½ doz. ½ doz. ½ doz. ½ do .. ½ Order the above items from: Department of Welfare & Institutions State Penitentiary IndustriaJL Shop Section 501 North Spring Street Richmond, Virginia The above for jail use only Foil USE OF EXECUTIVE SECRETARY ONLY REMARKG per dozen per dozen per dozen $35,75 per dozen 67~.69 21.65 21,65 .~ 5.? 5 .~ 5.? 5 ~ 5..75 8 2 ~IONATUR~ ~_ , Y ~ ~ .~ ...,~ Y V~ CHESTERFIELD C. H., VA. 23832 E. L. WIN(~O, SHERIFF September 20, 1971 Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary Chesterfield, Va. Dear Mr. Burnett: The State Compensation Board has finally approved two of the four jail deputies, contengent on the approval of the Board Of Supervisors, at a starting salary of $5,450.00. Please ask the supervisors for their approval. Thank you. Very truly yours, DA, VII) ~t. AYRES+ JR. CHAIRMAN JOHN M. RASNICK, JR. ~V. H. FORST COMPENSATION BOARD P. O. BOX 1177 RICHMOND. VIRGINIA 23209 Septmber 17, 1971 Hr. g. L. ~in8o Sheriff Chester£~eld County Chesterfield C. a.s Va. 23832 D~r ~r. At e usot~nlof the CompeneationBoard held on yesterday, your letter of September 2 vas presented. Subject to concurrence by your Bo~rd of Supervisors, the Compenaatton Board approved two addtttoeal delmtiem for your of£ice et · salary of $5,4~0 each to bm effective al of date of emplo~umt. Very truly yours, ltavtd B. Ayres, Jr., Chairman (.tiled) ]btecucive Secretary Jl~Jr:gr cc: Board of Supervisors PLEd.Se MOT]I; The Co'--~mnsatiou Board met be advised by the Board of Supetv~oors of ica concurrence tn the above salary cheeses before the Statdb pa~t of math cheuse can he cerCt£ted for PaTmeeC. CHAIRMAN ~i. RASNI C1~., September 17, 1971 Mr. E. L. Wingo Sheriff Chesterfield County Chesterfield C. H., Va. 23832 Dear Mr. Wingo: At a meeting of the Compensation Board held on yesterday, your letter of September 2 was presented. Subject to concurrence by your Board of Supervisors, the Compenoa=ion Board approved ~wo additional dzputiao for your office a~ a salary of $5,450 each to be effective as of da=e of employmcnn. ~i<RJr: gr Board of Supervi$o',-s Very truly yours, ,'./: ....., /,>'" , ,. ~e~u~iv~ ~ecr~ary PLi~%SE ,NOTE; The Compe .... t~o,, Boa;"d must be a=v;~c~ ~', ,..~,~ .;~,::.3,n of Supervisors of its concurrence in the a&ove sSi&ay changes ~euc..'= ~::~ :.=c~',~ -:,ar= o? such chanse can be cer~ifled fo~- J J R~4A. -