The URL can be used to link to this page

10-13-71 PacketVXI~XMXA, &~ a regular meeting o£ the Cotm~, held a~ ~he Co--ute on Ootobor 13. 1971 a~ 9~00 A.M. AW OBD~ ~o vaeate a ten (20) foot easement for five feet of id~h tm along each e~Sa of the aide dividi~l ef LO*~ 36 and 37, SeatLon 1, B~uoe Fard~ Subdtv~a~m, p~at ~~ 'W~e ~CX~e ~ ~a~Xin ~. C~, h~~ aP~ ~i~e. ~e ~t~tA~ ~e ~d of au~teo~ ~ S~tv~t~, ft~ f~t of said mmet ~t~ on ~ 36, ~ f~ f~t ~ om ~t 37, a ~at of maid o~tvte~ ~ r~~ ~ ~ CX~kts O~fi~ of ~e C~tt C~t ~ Co~, V~~. ~ Pla~ ~k 8. Page 77; ~ ~~ ~t ~ vacat~ s~ ~ f~ e~u~t hav~ ~ given ~ vt~ ~~ XS.~431, C~e ~ V~ia, lg50, aa I. ~t ~m~t ~ S~t&on 15.1-431, C~e of V~~. ~hat ~ m (X0) f~t ~lm~t for u~lttt~, fi~ f~t of ~d 37, ~t~m X, ~e F~ ~Xvlat~, a plat of ~ ~ r~~ ~ ~e CX~k.m Offt~ of ~ C~tt ~t Of ~~- field ~~, V~ta, tn Plat ~k 8, ~age 77, ~ b~ ~ ~~ s~l ~ ~ ~ll fo~e ~ eff~t ~ a~~ WL~ ~tion 15.1-431, C~e of VX~X~a, 1950. u Cl~k's ~fX~ of ~e C~cuXt ~ o~ ~es~fXeXd Co~f VXrg~Xa A Copyt Teate - PETITION tO: The Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia Re: Vacation of a ten (10) foot easement for utilities, five feet of which is along either side of the side dividing line of Lots 36 and 37, Section 1, Bruce Farms Subdivision, a plat of which is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chester- field County, Virginia, in Plat Book 8, page 77. Your petitioners, Wade L. Cliborne and Jacklin P. Cliborne, husband and wife, respectfully represent: 1. That they are the owners of Lot No. thirty-six (36) and the adjoining portion of Lot No. thirty-seven (37), Section ~one, Bruce Farms Subdivision, Bermuda Magisterial District, Cheste~ field County, Virginia. 2. That there is a ten foot easement for utilities along the side dividing line of Lots 36 and 37, Section one, Bruce Farms, five feet of said easement being on Lot 36 and five feet on Lot 37. 3. That the Engineering and Utilities Department has checked Lots 36 and 37 of Bruce Farms, Section one for potential drainage problems requiring easements and in a letter of August 2, 1971, states that "the Engineering Department does not require or have any easements on these two lots." See Exhibit #1. WHEREFORE, your petitioners pray that the Board of Supervisors will consider the ordinance attached hereto for adoption in order that the aforesaid easement be abandoned and vacated in accordance with Section 15.1-482; Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Respectfully, Philip V. Daffron Daffron, Winston, Jewett & Powers P.O. Box 127 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Wade L. Cliborne and Jacklin P. Cliborne By: ~Co~e~l. ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVING. HORNER, CHAIRMAN CLOVER HiLL DISTRICT C. J. PURDY BERMUDA DISTRICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS F. F. DIETSCH MANCHESTER DISTRICT HERBERT O. BROWNING MATOACA DISTRICT ANDREW R. MARTIN M]DLOTH~AN DISTR~CT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA ROBERT'A. PAINTER, COUNTY ENGINEER M.W. BURNETT ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY August 2, 1971 Mr. Wade L. Cltborne 12918 S. Chester Road Chester, Virginia 23831 Dear Mr. Cliborne: Re: Bruce Farms, Sec. 1 Very truly yours, Assists_ut County Engineer WA /J bk cc: Mr. R. A. Painter I have checked Lots 36 and 37 of Bruce Farms, Section 1 for potential drainage problems requiring easements. ~e Engineering Depertment does not require or have any easements on these two lots. COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD AGENDA FOR THE ~ETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS II. III · XV. V~ VI. VII · VIII. Xm XI. Approval of witter ~71-~8D Space Road - Philip Morris ~ector ~k ~,2~.58 ~1-47~ Wil~ ~tates, S~tion "A" ~12,116.30 ~1-~ G~ee~ut Mille, $~fon '~", ~e I $13,318.61 ~ard of water contract C-&12A, Stigall Drive from ROUte 360 Co Clifton Farms, to Stamia E. Lyttle Company, Incorporated in ~e emount of $28,636.30. Authorize execution of Agreement with Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company covering inat~lati~ and maintenance of a 12-inch water line crossing at a point 1232 ~eet north o£ Mile Post SAC-10, Mopewell Subdivisbn, Rocky Nmmt Division. Approval for County pereormel to attend t_he A. W. W. A. masting lteviev of interim sever report by R. Stuart Royer & ~eociaCes and J. t~. Tiummne & imaociates. Approval of sever contract: S71-339 ~eadovdale, Section '¥" $1,976.00 ~ward si Sever Project 6511-21A, ~raemmere. Consideration of let~er, dated October 1, 1971, from John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated for extension of sever Co se~;e proposed 5X-acre ahopptn8 canter at Routes 60 and 147. Consideration of letter, dated 9eptember 21, 1971, from J. K. Timnonm &Associates conemrning severe p~n~ping station at Falling Creek on ROute 60. Constderationo£ requ~t for extension Of tinm ~o January 1, 1972 on Project 6511-68 from E~lish Construction Co~em7, Inc. (Letters dated Augttet 12, 1971, September 27, 1971 and ~ptember 29, 1971). Consideration of extension of thirty (30) days time ~or Project 6511-~$A, Statute E. Lyttle Company, Incorporated. (Letter dated October 6, t971). COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA Gomstdar~iou of Xetter, ditaHI 0e~ober S, X971, from XXXX. DtmuNXmn of ev~XlebXlXry' of smur ~o serve ~MBXX properL7. nv. Iovh~ of eounL7 sql. Robert: A~ I~lint:er O~t. ok~n. 12, 1071 PLANNINO DEPARTMENT'S MOBILE HOl~ REPORT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WEDNESDAY, 13 OCT. 1971 ~.1,T,75.... <Deferre~ ) This case was deferred to today's meeting to olamify the situation as pertains to the use of county water and sewer. On permit #18880 filed tn the Building Inspector's office there was the following notation - "8ewer and water inspected, connected to original house line. 8-28-69". On August ~, 1971~ the Board of Zoning Appeals denied the renewal request because the mobile home was being used for rental purposes. Wayne Wo Moore's moblle home w~ll be parked on property belonging Adjacent property owners state no objection to this request which is for two years. There are no similar permits in the immediate area. ?~-T-.~ B~uce H. Anderson No Health Department report is requested because the mobile home will be for storage purposes only. The mobile home will be parked on property belonging to the applicant. Adjacent property owners state no objection to this request which is for an unspecified period of time. There are 12 similar permits in the immediate area. Respectfully submitted, R. L. Kautz Planner Chesterfield County Planning Department DOUGLAS b. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G. L. 8AUGHAN, LURAY, VA. MORR~LL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORTR, NORFOLK, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHSURG, VA. RUFUS T. HAIRSTON, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. ENGINEER a K HUNSBERGER DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 September 22, 1971 J.V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS H. GORDON BLUNDON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING Additions and Abandonments Secondary System - Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors of Ghesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board on November 13, 1968, the following additions to and abandonments from the Secondary System of Chesterfield County are hereby approved~ effective September 22, 1971. ADDITIONS LENGTH Section 8 of new location of Route 647~ from connecting Station 6+10 to connection Station 24+75, Project 0892- 020-112,C-501. 0.35 Mi. Section 9 of new connection~ from new location of Route 647 to old lecation of Route 647, Project 0892-020-112, C-501. 0.03 [cd.. ABANDONMENTS Section 1 of old location of Route 647, from Station 6+10 west 0.07 mile to new connection, Project 0892-020- 112,C-501. ,0.07 Mi. Section 3 of old location of Route 647, from 0.14 mile west of Station 6+10 to 0.19 mile west of Station 6+10, Project 0892-020-112,C-501. 0.05 Mi. Copies: Mr. A. S. Mattox Mr. P. B. Co id iron Mr. C. A. Palmer Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr. Mr. L. H. Dawson, Jr. Mr. W. R. Davidson - Chesterfield Sincerely~ y Commissz ' , , A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT . ~ ( on~ I rom this Tkis day 'the C~unty koud En~'in,~or in accordance wit, h :~ ~ ' Sul',.iivisien~ }: ~r,::uJa ~,:a'~ ~ ~'i i l.:.:~ r{n,,~ Ches~r~ aid 3>unty, ~'ir,:inia~ which skews Lh:.~ in (kc el:in[on if' .}:: Ctunty ko~:~d Snline<:r it is ex} ediont bha% said ~:ot'~ L.l'x:lJ.r;erlJtbicn v,~ pr,~,n~", an:ion mot:Ion of'. ~',, ~.,~,,y,~'''' ''~, it i s Fi~'iolv (l~ t. hat 'Ircely ,,~,~ ~.. ~?.~ ~ar:: N.':sj'}:Ls .>u::fiJvision~ Bermuda bJstr'ic%~ Le~ r~tl: it }'ePobv~ is l'.cr. : l.' is r. '..~ t:d t.c .... ~,~ ir:Lo 1. i~,~ :,eccncar'y ~toa]Sv'~t~rn. , zrc:.;~y .....:i, t ' ...... ; ~:' ::;.;in,.,~,',r~ce,~ ,m.., ~'tS. i152 (.:,o' ' miles w,~s~ cZ' ~toute 144) and ex~ndins westwa:',:tiy.'~,... :;iles. This r'oai ::er'viis 12 houses. An! ;.~ it ('~.'t, ~';· F~soi,~..: 'k'.t t}ke iJoard of' Sd}}ef'vi.:3or.B of Chester'field Oounty~ Vita-ir;ia, ruaFa:;%c.25 t;c: '}(~ ViFjinia Departr~,}nt -'", Ni.-hways, ,-.. Fi:chh of way of not (~SS Lhs,r~ fi0 f~ ~ t5 f'Or tki '~ FOOd. Dedi:ition e%~.::',i~: r'i 'h:~ of' ',,ay r.mor'c~d in Deed Book ~.00,~ Pa6e~ 261~ Chesterfield t.t~-['t,. FO:% i; }' fi::] :[;~ W,2,J[,.%!'.",~y l'Forli *,,,,e"', irlt, eFSOCt, io~i Gl' ~ec~ +~f,ou' and :.~ ,'~ ~,tl;:ntic ;c':'~._,:. L~n,~ ~0,:., t.o .~ C:mr::onwealth Natural Gas ~:'::r:,l'.v,'2:',Ji.y on ,'J 5(-:'L. t'i:'ht, ,:iF way zo a proposed road in au%horized tn send ~}'} for,,~ioin~~' rc.:~iut,~or. ~,(~ 5}:~ ~.[ h;~,r~y berarLm,,nt u:2n %he receipt of the estim:iL ~ ~:;f t,?iS CoSt. ~ On :~oo~on of 1,,r.u~yne, seconde<~ sy ~',r. ;:ril, tcn, :in l::; resolved th::~t t~ I records its agreesen~, bo ~ay b~e full cost of wide:L~,~ kb. 6lQ, from ~ay Separtment c~n ~ ~u,~ in~uo~r~l ,unds fo N rrcv~n~ ~h~, rca On motion of P<r.Driskill, seconsec oy F.r.O:~yne, it is resolvc,~' that tkis 16car'd requests the highway Department to improve !uiiiam Street Oetwe~n Trent ks.ad and Trevillian ~{oad to m~-~et th~ n,inimum specifications of the hi:-hway De.~ar%ment. and charge same to the 3'~ [{o~-:d Fund of the Sounty. This day the County koad EnL~lneer in accordance with directions from this [:,oardi made report in writing upon his exa:nination of I'eter"sburg Street in the Subdivision of Chester, in Bermuda [viagi. st;erial bistrict, ,,i~ich shows that in the~ opinion of the County ~toad En<in~er it iJ expe ~ient ....... ~ % said road be ..... s'"hlish~ as a public road. Upon consideration wheF. of, and on motion of i.k'.Ooyne, it is resolved that Fetersbur'g Street in the subdivLsion of Chester, in tom,ada ~istrict, b~, and it~ horeby is nstablished as a ~,ui:lic road. ..... t the Vir/~inia Copartm<}nb o[' Nl.::hways, ~:;,:, and ~nd ce ~ t further resc]ved, it noreby is r'e, nesbr,(] bo t.,};o ir:t(; ~'o S,:<:oni ' ' beginnin,;, a' ~,h,.~ i. ntersccti on {,~' .... i~: ut, es ! 522 a~'{ .l',l~, an:: cxL(;:,{:in. ::u:'thwcatwa: .11 niles no itout::~ 616. i'his roa~: s,J:'ves 5 hous,:s. ~0 ; e it rur'bher rosoiv<~i t[::,b the Soar'd of Su~c. nvi'sors of Che:;t,.t'fiei4 Virsinia, guarantees to the Virginia ber~artment c.f Hi:'hways, a r'i~hc of way of n~ less than ~O feet for this road. Dedication of' sa!d. r~d~t of .,,W r~corded in Deed ;~ook gl, Pa;~e 0?5, Ches of Conner M,.~s ?~,,.,. kur;ck ~;3ber ,.a.,'ist :r].,,i ;,i,?, i ",,, ,,'. l,::: ::} ~;'.'s t,?':;t. ]~,. *; c,,,. o~inlon of' the COUNTY Of CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA September 23, 1971 ~r, ,:. .~. Davtdson i~esident En?ineer Virginia Dept. of Highways ?.C.Box 3036 Bon Air, Virginia 0ear ~r. Davidson: I have discussed with the board of Supervisors your le'tter dated September 20~ 1971 concerning the bill for $31~90.85 for the adjustment of utilities on the road to th~ ~m~rican Tobacco Company. ~e all agree it is quite strange to render a bill over eight years old~ however~ I am sure the County wishes to do the correct thing in this case and w~ ask that you send us a copy of a bill from the Virginia Electric and ~owe= Company in the amount of $1784,00 and the bill from the CaP Telephone Company in the amount of $1236.26, it was our recollection that no telephone lines were on this road at this time. ~e will again place thJ.s on the agenda for further discussion on the receipt cf the two bills mentioned. Sincerely yours~ M~B: W M,%~.Burnett Executive Secretary DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G.L. BAUGHAN. LURAY, VA. DOUGLAS G, JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOLK, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. RUFUS T. HAIRSTON, BRISTOL, VA. LE ROY EAKIN. JR.,McLEAN, VA. ROBERT S. WEAVER, JR., VICTORIA, VA. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND, VA. 232~9 JOHN E. HARWOOD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER A. B. EURE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J. V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS W. S. G. BRITTON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING September 20, 1971 L. R. TREAT, JR. DISTRICT ENGINEER OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803 P. O. Box 3036 Bon Air, Virgiuia 23235 Mr. M. W. Burmett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Re: Billing for Right of Way Industrial Access Road to America Tobacco Company Dear Mr. Burnett: I refer to your letter of September 2, 1971 to which was attached a bill in the amount of $3,290.85 relative to the above subject. You were correct in that the right of way per se was donated by the various property owners. However, certain utilities had to be adjusted in order to construct the road. The amount of the cost for VEPCO's adjustment was .$1,784.00 and C & P's adjustment vas $1,236.26. Actual right of way costs were $270.59. The three amounts just stated gives the total of $3,290.85. It is my understanding that these necessary adjustments and recording fees for right of way, etc., were at the County's expense. Therefore, it would be appreciated if the County would place this bill in line for payment. I will be happy to discuss this should you so desire. Very truly yours, ~TRD/vcn attachment CC: Mr. C. A. Palmer Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr. - Attention: Resident Engineer Mr. J. S. Hodge A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT M~no Order No. Progress Bill blo. 1 & Final Date Shipped i~ugust 25, 1971 Shipped to Proj: 0619-O20-t18-C501 .. COMMO.W -^LTH Or DEPARTMENT OF HIGHW~ _$ Sold To Chesterfield County Bought o£__ Attn. Mr. Robert A. Painter Street and Number County Engineer Richmond, Va. 23832 City and State Address Description: Int. Rt. 618-0.945 bli.N. Int. Rt.618 DATE DEL. UNIT PRICES MUST BE SHOWN ON ALL ITEMS AMOUNT DUE ThrouRh 8- 30- 67 Participation in cost incurred in accordance with County Resolution executed March 28, 1963. Cost County' s Incurred Share Right of Way 3,290.85 100% Amount Due Credit: 02234020 501-11026 JCJ/lll cc: Mr. C. A. Palmer, Secondary Roads Engineer cc: Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr., District Engineer, Petersburg cc: Mr. W. R. Davidson, Resident Engineer, Chesterfield-Direct $3,290.85 COUNTY ROUTE CiTY OR COUNTY SECTION PROJECT SECTION JOB Lotte~ Numb~ LAN D OWNER ACTIVITY AMOUNT ADVANCE FUND CHECK NO. DATE f EQUIPMENT CHARGE ADM. & ENGR. TO RESIDENCY STOCK I certify that the above is correct Apprm~ed. R~. E~jneer Approved for Plymeflt Dist, ~gr. DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G. L. BAUGHAN, LURAY, VA. DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOLK, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. RUFUS T. HAIRSTON, BRISTOL, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. ROBERT S. WEAVER, JR., VICTORIA, VA. L. R. TREAT, JR. DISTRICT ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RICHMOND, VA. 23219 October 8, 1971 JOHN E. HARWOOD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER A. B. EURf[, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGiNEERiNG J. V. CLARKE. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS W. S. G. BRITTON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING OFFICE OF DISTRICT ENGINEER PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA 23803 P. O. Box 3036 Bon Air, Virginia 23235 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett: This is to acknowledge receipt of four (4) resolutions~passed by the Board of Supervisors on September 29, 1971 transmitted by your letter of October 4, 1971. We are forwarding the following resolutions to our District Engineer for consideration and review: 1. Provide some access to Chippenham Parkway from Walmsley Boulevard and Belmont Road. 2. Correct the turning lanes on Chippenham at Belmont Road and Walmsley Boulevard. We will keep in mind your resolution to improve the intersection of Newby's Bridge Road and Walmsley Boulevard and will set this work up whe~ funds become available. The Board's request to take the roads in Glen Conner Subdivision into the State System will be reviewed by me and I will advise the Board at a later date as to my decisions. ELC/vcn CC: Mr. L. R. Treat~ Jr,~ Very truly yours, E. 'Cavin n, Resident Engineer District Engineer - attachment A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT THE RICHMOND TIMES DISPATCH This ~s to certHy ~ha~ the a~mzueu ...... :...e .............. : .................... was published ~n The Rachmond T[mes*D[spatch~ a newspaper published ~n *he C~ty of R~chmond. S~ate of Vk~nia. The hrs; mser;mn being ~ven .................. t{~ EgP: .~ a Notary Publi~ 8ta~e of Vir~ma. City ot' Richmonr My commmsirm expires 4 / 6 / 7 3 ffOrm M-9A Revised 3-64 : COMMONWEALT~OF VIRGINIA FfNAL DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MAINTENANCE DIVISION TENTATIVE SECONDARY SYSTE/~ /AAINTENANCE,/~AINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION BUDGET July 1, 19 ~, to June 30, 19 ~ ' FUNDS PRIOR 1964 REGULAR ACTS 1964 FUNDS FUNDS TOTAL Less Deficit June 30, 19___ Plus Balance June 30, 19_ NET FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION 1.~[~,~ ~,V~*~ it~1~1~ BUDGET SUbgAARY ORDINARY MAINTENANCE INCIDENTAL STATE FUNDS ITEM MILEAGE MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENTS CONSTRUCTION PROJ. CONST. TOTAL ~,ura! ......... Incorporated Towns State Parks Ferry & Draw Bridge Operations SUB-TOTAL Payments ~ Towns ~., Genera~pense NUMBER AND TYPE OF AREAS or PATROLS ROAD MILEAGE BY CLASSES T Y P E MILEAGE DEC. 31, 19 I llard Surfaced ~J~ll~ H All-Weather JJ~jJ HI Lightly Surfaced IV Unsmfaced TOTAL /~AINTENANCE, Form M-ga Revised 3-64 DATE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVAL /~AINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION BUDGET SECONDARY SYSTEM DISTRICT COUNTY Form M-gB C~)MMONWEALT'~I OF 'VIRGINIA '~IIIl~ DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION ROUTE SECTION LENGTH ORDINARY MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE TOTAL MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT Estimated Estimated Co~t Rate Per Mile Estimated Cost Rate PR Mile Co~t Estimated Cost _ MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES DISTRICT SYSTEM COUNTY Form M-gB C6MMONWEALTI:~ OF 91RGINIA ~ DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION ROUTE SECTION LENGTH -- ORDINARY MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE TOTAL MAINTENANCE ........ REPLACEMENT ....... IF.~tlmated EMImated Goat Rate P~' Mile F~tlmated Coat Rnte P~ Mile Co~t F.~tifmLted Coat tt~ ~ O.~ m m ~ ~ ' ,, Total DISTRICT SYSTEM COUNTY MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES ~ ~OMMONWEAI~TH oF VIRGIN~.. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ~ MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES ROUTE SECTION LENGTH MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION ORDINARY MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE TOTAL MAINTENANCE E~tlmated Co~t Rate Per Mile REPLACEMENT Estimated Estimated Coot Rate Per Mile Co~t Estimated Cost Total DISTRICT MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES SYSTEM COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF ~/IRG, INIA · M DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES I MAINTENANCE CON~I'RUOTION ROUTE SECTION LENGTH ........... ORDINARY MAINTENANCE _ MAINTENANCE TOTAL MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT btlmated Eetlmated ~ott Rat~ Pwr Mile ihtlnuted OCli Rate P~' Mill Celt E~tlm~ld Coat ~'- ~ e. tO ......... ~ .... ~3~a t 4~M e.~ Ate .............. ~03; ~ 0.1% ' ~ --" ~ot~[ DISTRICT SYSTEM COUNTY MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES ~OMMONWEALTH OF' VIRG.INI. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION ROUTE SECTION LENGTH ORDINARY MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE TOTAL MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT Eatlmated Estimated Coat Rata Pe~ MHe Eatin'mted Cost Rata Per Mile Cost F.~tlmated Coat MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES DISTRICT SYSTEM COUNTY Form M-gc , C~MMONWEAL.Tlgl OF 91RGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DETAILS OF MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ACTUAL DATE ROUTE ACT. ESTIMATED APPROX. LOCATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH COST DATE TO STARTED sE~rlON START COMPLETED I)MI2 F. OM, a~, &53 .... To: a~:. Mt! ~ M.,. M.P. ,~ Smd, 10' lo. az ~11[~ FROM: ][~e aT~! ~-~j TO: ~1:. 1~:10 ~ M.P. M.P. A13 ~ 20t 3.~ ~.l~ 1~1 To: 413 ~ 20' ~.~ ~S M... M... 4~ TO:U.~ ~. I. ~. ~9 413 ~ 1~e 4.70 ~,P, ~m~ ,.FROM: ~1 ..... To: M.P. ~ ~-- M.P. FROM:_ ~ ~ ~o= ~13 ~ [S~ 3~0~ ~ 1971 M.P. FROM:~_ M,P, ~ M.P. ub M.P. 4~ TO: 613 Se~ 20' 0.39 61~ M.P. ~ =~. M.P. FROM :, _ A~A M.P. ~ ~ M.P. FROM:,-- ~ ~~ TO: ~13 le~ 20' 3.~O 3,0~ 1t71 ~ M,P, B~ &lA M,P, FSOM:u~ gl~ ._ J~ ~ M.P, ~_ i~ M,P ..... F"OM:~: ~ ~ ~.~. ~ ~ ~,P. _ ~~ TO= ~1} ~ 30~ 1~ ~ ~,P. Et~ ~ ~.P, ~OM=~= ~ ~ TO= ~1~ ~ 1~~ ~.~ ~~ M.P. ~ ~ M.P. M.P. M.P. DETAILS OF l~orm M-gC. MAINTu._~ Li~¥~' ii'! "i! CONSTRUCTION PROJKCT~ TOTAL $ DISTRICT SYSTEM COUNTY Form M-gC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA'd~ DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DETAILS OF MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ACTUAL DATE ROUTE ACT. ESTIMATED APPROX. LOOATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH COST DATE TO STARTED SEOTION START COMPLETED ~o: itc ~1 Jm ~rJ FROM: ~e ~ 4~ ~.,. ~.p. ~ ~ ~0~ [,OB 43~S ~.p. M.P. 4~3 ~ ~0e O,~ M.P. M.P. FROM: 4339 TO: ~4~ S~ ZO' 1.3X Z,O~ 1t71 FROM: ..... &~ ~o: 4~ ~ 20~ 0~ ~5 1971 A~& ~ M.P. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M.P. 43~1 ~13 ~ ZOO 0.60 Am~ ~ M,P. M.P. FROM: 43~ TO: 413 ~X 16* 3.20 ~.~O 1971 ~&~ M.P. ~_ ~ M.P. ,,. FROM: __ .. ~ M.P. ~ ~ M.P. FROM: ~ ~ FROM: ~ ~ ~ To: 413 ~ 30' O. XS 2~ 1971 FROM: ~.~ m.a J~ ~ ~o: ~X3 S~ 30' 0,~ 53~ X~71 p!~ ~.p. tt~ ~1 ~.". ,,, ~ TO: 413 ~ ~' 0.~3 ~ TO: ~ ~ 340 0,~ 7S3 1971 G~ M.P. ~_ ~ M.P. ,FROM: ~. ~A ~ To: 413 ~ Z0* 0,1~ 235 1~7Z M,P. M,P. DETAILS OF Form M-gC- CON STR U CTION PROJIFC'r'B TOTAL DISTRICT SYSTEM COUNTY Form M-gC C~)MMONWEAL.TH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS DETA[L,S OF _ ACTUAL DATE ES'TI MATED APPROX. ROUTE ACT. STARTED LOCATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH (~OST DATE TO START COMPLETED SEOTION , , ~ FROM: It~, IO~ April To: Deed ~ 4~1~1 M.P. M.P. 413 Seal 10! 0.32 120 'l~e$ FROM,: ILt, 638 - TO: ~[t. eD 4244 M.F.__ M.,. M.P. M.P. 0~ii FROM: lt. a,44 413 kal ZO" 0.14 220 4346 M... M... FROM: ira* 6~ M.P. M,P. ~348 TO: I,;o ~Ei4 413 Seal 20' 0023 360 1971 F.OM.' ..... aprtl 4349 To: ~ 413 Sod 20' 0. lll :}83 1971 M.P. M.P. TO: 413 ~ ]0' 0.35 S~ 1971 ~ To: 413 ~ 24' 0.40 6~ 1971 FROM: ~_j ~j ~ TO: 413 ~ 24' 0.20 315 1t71 FROM: W~ ~ TO: 413 ~ 18' 1.24 1.9S5 1971 M.P. M.P. TOTAL -~'~t7 DISTRICT M A I NT~--'--'--~- --~-~E M E NT ~'vl... *---de.,1 .a t~n% SYSTEM DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION PRO Jib'Il COUNTY Form M-gC A COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DETAILS OF MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ROUTE ACTUAL DATE ACt'. ESTIMATED APPROX. LOOATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENQTH 0CST DATE TO STARTED SEOTION START COMPLETED i,),31 ,F.o,~: ~ TO: ~ lind~' ~Jd~ M.P. M.P. ~r~ Li,~,~ FROM: It~ I -- TO: att" Ll,*l ~.,. M.P. ~ ~ [4~ 0~15 a~ 1~71 FROM: ~ TO: ~ ~ A&~ FROM: ;o= ~ ~ TO: ~ ~ FROM: ~_.m ~ ~o: 413 }1~ M.P. ~m ~ M.P. FROM: ~m ~ M.P. M~ ~ M.P. FRO~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M.P. ~ e~ M.P. FROM: ~ FROM: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FROM: ~_ ~ FROM: lC- IM FROM: jj~ ~ROM: t~ M.P. M.P. TOTAL ........................ DISTRICT MAINT ............... K'MENT DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS -- SYSTEM For,,, ~-~o COUNTY Fo~m M-gC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DETAILS OF MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ROUTE ACTUAL DATE ACT. ESTIMATED APPROX. LOOATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH GOST DATE TO STARTED SEb'~ION START COMPLETED TO: ~ ~ ~i~ FROM: '~J~' TO: ~ ~ TO: ~ ~ To: ~ ~ ~ ,?.OM: ~ ~ ,,,~ M.P. M.P. ~[3 ~ ~' 0.43 ~ .?o~: ~' ,~7 ..... ~o: FROM: ~__ ~ ~ J FROM: ~ 1~ M.P. ~ taa~ M.P. ~ TO: ~13 ~ 24' 0.03 ~ 1~ M.P. Be. ~ M.P. S&~ M.P. ~ ~ M.P. FROM: ~m~ ~ FROM: ~& &~ FROM: h~ ~md ~ M.P. M&. t~ M.P. ~ To: ~Z3 ,~1 ~' O,~ 710 FROM: Be. 2~ ~ M.P. ~, ~ M.P. 4~ To: &13 ~ ~' 0, t6 ~ M.P. M,P. DETAILS OF Form M-gG CONSTRUCTION PROJECT! TOTAL DISTRICT SYSTEM COUNTY Form M-gC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ~ DI=PARTM£NT OF HIGHWAYS DETAILS OF MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ROUTE ACTUAL DATE ACT. ESTIMATED APPROX. LOCATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH 0OST DATE TO STARTED SEOTION START COMPLETED ~ FROM: itt. ~ To: ~ ~ ~3 M.P. M.P. 4&3 ~ U' 0,17 370 ~ M.P, M.P. FROM: ~ ~ M.P. M.P. ~AA M.P. m& dm~ M.P. FROM: ~ ~A~ M.P. ~ m~ A~ M.P. FROM: ~.~ ~ FROM: ~ ~ FROM: ~ ~ 'Ro~: ~ ~ FROM: ~ ~ M.P. M,P. DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION PROJEC'rl TOTAL ~ chel~~ (J~) DISTRICT SYSTEM COUNTY Form M-gC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS DETAil..~ OF ACTUAl. DATE ESTIMATED APPROX, ROUTE ACT. STARTED LOCATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH GOST DATE TO START COMPL.ETED SECTION ,, -- LTLI. F~OM: ~t. ~1~ J&TY To: ~ ~ ~ FROM: at, 2X47 JULy 2~e~ "ROM: it, Z1.47 JuLy .... &LT ~ Z~Il~ O, Z3 ZO~J ~3 M.F. .... M... ,, M.p, M.P. ,.. ~Z6 _To: ~ ~ 44~8 TO: ~ b 413 ~ 20' 0,~ ~ 1971 M.p. M.P, -- TO: ~413 ~ a0* 0.16 IM ~ M.P. ~_ m~ M.P. M.P, ~' -- ~~ M.P. M'P' ;,oM: ~ ~ 44,32 ~o: 413 S~ 20' 002~ 440 ~q~fl M.P, ~. ~ ~ M.P. ~ M.P. ~ ~ ~ M.P. .~ FROM: ~ ~ FROM: ~m_ ..... _ ~ To: ~3 ~ 30' O,Z4 ~ FROM: ~ ~ M.P. io~ ~1~ M.P. fROM: ~ ~ M.P, M.P. TOTAL $ ~ebsm (~) e--~J-~ DISTRICT MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT ~ ..... ,,--,-. -,,~,.~ SYSTEM DETAILS OF ~ PROJE~I ~w.s~w ~-~ COUNTY Form M-gC- Form M-gc COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DETAILS OF MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ROUTE ACT "~TI MATF. D APPROX. ACTUAL DATE SEOTION LOCATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH COST DATE TO STARTED START ~ .... FROM: ~ ~ COMPLETED ~ FROM: ~ ~ TO: a,e4 ~ ...TO: a, me ale ~ ~ FROM: ~ ~'~ ~ FROM: FROM: ....... FROM: ~ ~ ~ FROM: ~ ...... ~ ~ TO: TOTAL ~ ~l~lt ~ DISTRICT DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION PROJ~'~TI -_'~'.-:~_-::'_-~l_~_t_at~ ~__--~ SYSTEM ~o~= ~-9~ COUNTY Form M-DC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DETAIL~ OF MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS ROUTE ACT. F.~'IMATED APPROX. ACTUAL DATE LO~,ATION KEY TYPE OF' WORK LENGTH COST DATE TO STARTED SEI~TION START ~ "FROM: ~ m COMPLETED ~ M.P. M.P. ~ fROM: ~ W% i M.P. M.P. ~ ,~m,,,.,..~ ~. ~il&~ ~11~ ~ ~ ~,~.. -- ~ FROM: ~ ~ .F.O.: m ~ i M.P. M.P. FROM: ~ ~ ~ M.P. M.P. M.P. M.P. ~ FROM: ~ ~ ~o= ~ ~ ~ ~.OM~ ~ ~ ~ ~.OM: ~ ~ ~ ,.oM: ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ .... FROM: ~ F.o~: ~ ~ -- FROM: ~ M'P M~ .... i I m TOTAL $.~ . ± ~21~ ......... DISTRICT ~[TA[LS OF CONSTRUCTION ~OJ~CT~ COUNTY Form M-DG Form M-gc COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT DETAIL~ OF PROJECTS ROUTE ACTUAL DATE ACT. F.$TIMATED APPROX. LOCATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH COST DATE TO STARTED SE~rlON START COMPLETED To; ~ a4~ ada ~1~ FROM: ~ ~ To.. ~ :Male F.OM.. ~ ~ ,,TO: ~ :adee M.P. M.P. ,.,FROM: M ~ TO: O*Oa & #, ~,, M .FROM: amee To: O.~ ~ ~ ma. acme _FROM: ~ ~ 4,art M.p. ~.,. ~ atWSal, ~ ~* 0.~ e~ ~11 _ M ~.OM: ~ ~ ~& FROM: ~ ~ .... FROM: .... FROM: ~ ~.OM: ~ ~ - ~ FROM: ~ ~ ~ F~OM: ~ ~ -'' FROM: ~ TOt TOTAL -~ ...........- DISTRICT DETAILS OF pRO.JE~--rl ~~~--!~ ~ SYSTEM ~o,= ~.~c- COUNTY l~otm M-gC COMMONW£A/TH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT DETAILS OF PROJECTS ROUTE ACTUAL DATE A~r. ES'TI MATED APPROX. LOCATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH COST DATE TO STARTED $1~TION START COMPLETED 1"144 F.OM: ~ 11848 F.OM: ~ tl4,l ~ M.P. M.~. _FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. .... FROM: FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P, FROM: M.p. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: .,, TO: M.P, M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M,P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P, FROM: ' ' TO: M.P. M.P. TOTAL ..... '---- DISTRICT MAINTI--- ........... MENT .............. ~ --- -- ',-, --~ SYSTEM DETAILS OF "C'ONSTRUCTiO~ PROJ[CTI ~~~ ~e COUNTY Form M-~ Form M-gc COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ~, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DETAILS OF """: ...... - ............................ PROJECTS ][t~l~UIf~ CONSTRUCTION ROUTE ACTUAL DATE ACT. E~rlMATED APPROX, LOCATION KEY TYPtE OF WORK LI~IGTH COST DATE TO STARTED SECTION START ,, COMPLETED ~e .,,FROM: ~,~, 7~1], i~l~ ~ ~ TO: M~. ~t !~3:l ttetaa~. Spot Uo~k S~3 TO: ~t. ~ 533 ~ bm at~ A J~ "M.P. M.P. S~ & S, ~0 O.~ 2.~ 1971 ~ M,P. .~. _ , ~ ~.P. M.P. .. ~P. FROM: ~. ~ s ~. ~. ~ 533 ~ ~ a~ 57 FROM: ~ M.P, ~_ ~d M.P. ~ TO: ~ TO: ~: ~~~~ ' ~.~ 1911 ~ M,P, .... ,.o.: .... $~ To: ~ V~ ~4e ~ " ~ 1971 M.P, M.P. TOTAL ~~ {~) ',.-.,.,,.-..a~' DISTRICT D£TAIL5 OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ~ilt~~ ~,~) SYSTEM Fo,-, ~-~o COUNTY Form M-gC ~COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ..'~,, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY5 1~ DETAIL~[~J~jii~]~ ............................... CONSTRUCTION -'"'~ PROJECTS ~~ TOTAL ~~ . ~. ,, ~~'"~;~-'=~:~~ ~ DISTRICT DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTI ~ SYSTEM ~o~= M-gc. COUNTY ROUTE J ACTUAL DATE ACT,I E~rIMATED APPROX. LOOATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH COST DATE TO STARTED SECTION 8TART .... M.P. ~... M.P. M.P. ~ FROM: M.P. M.P. ~ ,,FROM: '~ FROM: FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M,P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: -, , ..TO: M,P, M.P. FROM: TO: M.P, M,P. Form M-gc COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ~ DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY:. DETAILS OF ~~ PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION ROUTE ACT. ESTIMATED APPROX. ACTUAL DATE LOCATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH COST DATE TO STARTED SECTION START COMPLETED ~65~20 FROM: ]~tl~.fl[ ~fil[} 1-11-71 )M~01 -.P. . M.~. $~pl, Allo~tton 312~O }~47-020 ~OM:ROU~ ~0 -- -- -- ..T0: ~ute 6~0 Courtier ~ect July L0~CSO1 M.P. M.P. 8uppl, ~loeation 40~ 1972_ )~20 mOM:~p~~ .tO ~--~6~ ~,C~1 M.P. M.P. L1q~tm ~fZett 11,595,01 ~1~70_~ )~20 FROM:Appr~ to ~2~69 L26,C~01 M.P. ~.P. ~q~te ~1=tt 5~5A0.75 ~70 L27-~62~ *M.P. M.,. ~L~q~d~ta ~t~t 5.~,72 ~70 )722~20 _mOM: ~Ut~ ]6 ~3~68 To: ~U~ L2~501 ~..., ~... ~q~t. Mftett t~501 M.P.' M.P. !S~p1, ~o~C~n 40.~ 1971 LJ~B628 ~.,. M.P. Suppl. ;~lo~t~n 15,~ 1971 ~31~501 ~.p. ~.,. -- SuppX, Al~catton 3m1~,94 197~76 ~31-~&29 ~o: ~th~ Pro, eeC /~t~l PLpe S~t, }60~020 ~.o~:~u~e 665. ~o: ~na~ co~ty~lne ,3~501 M.~. ~.P. Ltqu/date Deftclt 1,344.21 197~76 16&~20 F~0M: B~tdg~ ~e~ --- ~1--70 · o: Yall~8 Cr~k ~36.B630 ~.,. ~.p. Liquidate ~fLc/t [9,159,~ ~-~70 )7ii~Z0 mo~:~ute ~7 '- To: ~ute 268 ~ntraet Project S~pL, ~locatt~ 1S,~ :197~ ~0eC501 M.,. ~.,. ~67~20 FROM:~UtO ~ ~ntFact Pro, eot ~y ~C~01 M.P. ~.P. ~uppl. ~IO~=~U 90~0 1973 )~Z~ZO F.oM:~proa~ to Bridge -- l~tLal ~lo~a~on I,~0 ~973 M.P. M.P. ~u~ne~ ~.~. ~tract, ~rtdge ,i~ To: Initi~ ~lo~flon 500 1973 ~.~. ~.~. ~r~ ac ~siaud S~ce Forces ,~ ~ M,P. M.P. at ~o~ C~eek State Forees ~opt. ,48,C501 ~o: -- ProJ,lnttt~ ~lo~, 500 1973 M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. TOTAL $. DISTRICT MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT SYSTEM DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Fo~m ~-9o COUNTY DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION COUNTY Form M-gC- COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINb DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DETAILS OF CON.~ N PROJECTS ROUTE ACT, E~rIMATED APPROX. ACTUAL DATE SECTION LOCATION KEY TYPE OF WORK LENGTH COST DATE TO STARTED START COMPLETED ~.~. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M,P. M.P. FROM: ..... TO: M.P, M.P. , .,FROM: TO: ,,. M.P. M,P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: _ M.P. M.P, FROM: -- ,,. TO: M,P. M.P. FROM: .... TO: M.P. M.P. FROM: TO: M.P. M.P, TOTAL MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT DISTRICT DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTI SYSTEM ~o~m z~.~c- COUNTY Form M-gD COMMONWEALTH OF VlRGIN~- DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS RECAPITULATION INCORPORATED TOWN ESTIMATES ORDINARY MAINTENANCE NAMES OF TOWNS ROUTE SECTION MILEAGE MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENTS CONSTRUCTION TOTAL TOTAL $ $ $ $ RECAPITULATION STATE PARKS AND STATE INSTITUTIONS ESTIMATES NAMES OF STATE PARKS ORDINARY MAINTENANCE AND STATE INSTITUTIONS ROUTE SECTION MILEAGE MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENTS CONSTRUCTION TOTAL RECAPITULATION MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF FERRIES AND DRAW BRIDGES ESTIMATED NAMES OF FERRIES AND DRAW BRIDGES ROUTE SECTION COST TOTAL $ INCORPORATED TOWN ESTIMATES STATE PARKS AND STATE INSTITUTIONS ESTIMATES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF FERRIES AND DRAW BRIDGES DISTRICT COUNTY SYSTEM Form M-9D ENGINEERING DEPT. WATER SEWER HEALTH DEPT. DATE REC ~D. DATE REC ' D (YES) PUBLIC (NO) THE LTfqDERSIGNED OWNER HEREBY APPLIES FOR A PEPd4IT TO BUILD ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING SPECiFICATiONS AND ALSO AGREES TO COMPLETE THIS WORK IN FULL CONFO?R~ITY WITH THE CHESTEKFiELD COUNTY BUILDING CODE AND ALL PiER "" --' .... ~:,~ -~.~ z~,.,~ REPAIR OF ALL D~GES TO SID~TALKS~ STREETS~ ALLEYS, S~ERS, GAS b~iNS~ WATER ~INS, AND ELECTRIC INSTALLATIONS WHICH ~AY RESET FROM THIS WORK. TO THE OFFICE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE 9-14-71 OWNER Curtis W. Vinson ADDRESS Rt. 1 Box 73 Chesterfie~NE 526-1947 BUILDER Jim Walter~ Home%ADDRESS P. O. Box 1010 Rich. PHONE 270-6011 DISTRICT Mat ZONE SUB- D IV. LOT BLK SEC . LOCATION (ST. OR RD.) Near Hickory Rd.& Rowlette CHAR. OF SOIL APPROVED ROAD FRONTAGE 105 ACCESSORY COMMERCIAL DESCRIBE WORK Residence NO. OF STORIES I~PE OF CONST.RESD. ~ALTERATIONS~ADDITI©N OTHER -- MATERIALS: ROOFPITCH DIMENSIONS: BATHS 1 DISHWASHER no FOUNDATION Block WALLS Frame ROOFING asphatl 4/12 TYPE OF HEATING Space heater ELECTRICITYYESxxxNO WIDTH OF FRONT 38 DEPTH24 HGT. . . BEDROOMS 3 existing DEEP 75 REAR AUTO.WASHER no GARBAGE DISPOSAL no WELL S~LLO~xxxx SET BACK: FRONT SEWERAGE DISPOSAL: PERCOLATION DATE PUBLIC SYSTEM OTHER OWNER YR. AGO Same LEFT 3.,5 RIGHT 35 LOT SIZE 105x400 for trailer SEPTIC TANKExisting PUSLIC SYSTEM DRY 'CLOSET FOR '.ST~iATED COST OF WORK TO BE DONE $ BY ./~q(~'P~,~BUILDING FEE $ je:cluding ~elec.= plbg., and htg~) SEPWIC FEE ~ existin~ '~J,; Cr' ' p ~ ^-ye c' u ..... ' ' ' " ' ' ¥ TtON. ONE SET O~ w,~cw ~u,.~ ~ ~= ~'~.., ...... ~._' "~ ........ ,~,>,,,lZ THIS AP~LICiA- . ~ 7~:~~* ~ff ~Fv'~ ~',~z//~'/, ,f/L:'f:/; h'l E OF OWNER ~, ...~ ~ .---- ,,,. ~ ' ~ OF APPLICANTh Cr~i JOHN S. BATTLE WILLIAM S. D-WOODS WILLIAM H. KING ALEXANDER W. NEAL, jR. W. GIBSON HARRIS JOHN S. BATTLE,JR. CARLE E. DAVIS WILLIAM C. BATTLE R~CHARD L. WILLIAMS ROBERT H. PATTERSON, JR. WILLIAM A. PERKINS, JR. ROBERT L.BURRUS, JR. WI LLARDI. WALKER FRED S. LANDESS EDWARD R. SLAUGHTER. JR. ROBERT E. STROUD THOMAS L. NEWTON~ JR. HENRY H. McVEY, ~ THOMAS S.WORD~ JR. GORDON H. ROSSER,JR. CHARLES C.WEBB JOHN M. OAKEY. JR. FREDERICK L.RUSSELL ALEXANDER H. SLAUGHTER R. GORDON SMITH WILLIAM R. WADDELL JOSEPH C, WOOL, JR. JOHN W. ~ATES,T~r GARY C. I~CGEE JAMES L. SANDERLIN LUCIUS H. BRACEY. JR. WILLIAM H. KING, JR, ROSEWELL RAG E, Trr LAW OFFICES Mc Guxa~, Woo~s & B~~ Ross BUILDING RICH~ION]), ~IRGINIA 28219 CABLE ADDRESS: McWoBAT TELEPHONE: (703) 643-8341 September 28, 1971 Mr. N. W. Burnett Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia C. VENABLE MINOR. COUNSEL MURRAY M. McGUIRE W. ALLAN PERKINS Re: Variance from Building Code Dear Mr. Burnett: On behalf of John Jefferson and Mattie Jefferson, owners of a tract of land, I make this request for a variance to the building code. The property is designated as a tract of land containing 4.74 acres, more or less, on a certain plat pre- pared by Kenneth L. Barton, Certified Land Surveyor, dated September 15, 1971, a copy of which is attached hereto. This property does not front on a public road and the owners, or their assigns, desire to build a single-family residence which may include a guest house and pool. Would you please take this matter up with the Board of Supervisors in order that a building permit could be issued. Thank you very much for your very kind assistance in this regard. CRS :jsc Enc. Very truly yours, Charles R. Swartz OLD Gij h,,l ROAD /. '~ 17 i 0 HAl' U~' q.7~ ACi{I,;S '~t~' I.AND, SITUATI;:D SOtrTq nF OLD GIJN ROAD~ IN MIDLOTIIIAN DISTRICT f)F CIIESTEiII~IEI.,I) COUNTY~ VIRGINIA. SCALE ,:- 1"= 100* SEPTEHI1EI[ 15, 1971. KENNETH L. BARTON CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR '~' II~ICHMON D. VIRGINIA L 5,5-,-r. NY,'7"' ; - ' J'% 4-! ~ A aeq~e,t te the bami ef Sapervioe~ - 0eteber t3, t971 The Ibn Air JunAer Wenan'l Club, in eeoopera+~en with ~e bn ~ Co~~ C~t~ ~d has ~e~ ~s fer ev~ ~bl~a ~m~ are n~ ~ve ~ ~de, ~ ef ~e p~ ~t. ~e ~~ me ~ en ~ ~e ~Iuc~t C~o at ~V b~auae ef Mre seve~ ~ ~blm, h~p Mre ~ e~. eve~ ~e ee~se~ e~ ~ ~ ~t~ ~ were a~p~at~, ~ ~ l~t ev~. ~l $~ u~t ~ck ~ce~~e ~ ~ as ef J~ lat~ ~7~. ~ ~ar we have a~ rea~ ~ ~h~ ~ ~ as ~ a~e avai~b~. ~a~, al ~esm~v~ er ~e bn ~ ~se~g Cm~ Ad~ Client A 20 times The presenting problem of Client A was that he was having difficulty in school and difficulty in his family relationships. During counseling his mother and his teacher reported a change in attitude in his approach to school. He was referred to a school psychologist for an educational evaluation.,Plans were made for the client to attend summer s 'school. Client '~ B 2 times This six-year-old client was seen in counseling because he was having difficulty controlling his bowels. It was decided that he have a physical examinatiOn to rule out any physical basis for this problem. Client C 7 times The presenting problem with Client C was difficulty within her family structure. She was living with her father and step-mother. Both the client and her parents were seen in counseling. After counseling, her step-mother ap- peared more confident'in her relationship with the child. Client D 8 times This client was having difficulty with Mis peer ~elationships. The child was not willing to discuss his problems with the counselor. It was suggested to his parents that he be referred for a psychological evaluation, but his mother did not think that this was necessary; therefore, counseling was terminated. Client E 13 times This client was having difficulty with her relationship to her parents. Both the client and her parents were seen in counseling-it seemed that communication improved. Some of the counseling sessions were devoted to educational and vocational planning. The client began to think more seriously about her future vocational plans. Client F 7 times The presenting problem with this client was the lack of communication with her family. The client and her parents were seen in counseling. Family communication appeared to improve, but since the clini~ was closing for the year, the client was referred to Dr. Bright of the Adolescent Clinic. Client G 7 times This client was not able to control ~is temper. His parents were requested to have him examined physically to rule out any physical basis for this problem. Since the results from the medical examination were negative, the emphasis in the counseling sessions was on helping him learn to control his temper. His parents reported that he was controlling his temper much better since he had been in counseling. Client H - A 14 year old male. Parents concerned with a D he made in Englisk. Seen only once. Client I - The counselee was seen twice. There was considers]~le inse- curity which was apparently from changing schools. Supportive counseling. Client J ~ An 11 year old girl who appeared overly dependent on mother. Difficult to~et ker to talk. There were small behavioral problems. After 5 sessions mother felt relationship with client much improved. Client K - This 14 year old male is the son of a multiple-sclerotic father. Client has many problems in adjusting to home situa- tion. Suspended from school after a fight. Had failed. 3rd and 7th grades. Stopped coming (he had to walk a~out two miles) befOre any real Pr0gress'.could be made. Client L ~ A 15 year old male. Poor relationship with both parents. Since he was experimenting witk drugs, several of the 9 sessions were spent with an ex-drug addict' (a student at VCU) while the r~gu-. lar counselor conferred with the father. Counseling was not successful and the client eventually ran away from home. Client M - A hyper-.active 9 year old, Seen only once. He appeared to have an organic basis to his over-activity and was referred to the Children's Clinic on Patterson Avenue. Client N ~ Very bright, talented, 16 year old girl was referred as a self- referral, saying she doesn't "get along with people" Had pro- blem with parents over her being overly attached to ~er 17 year old boy friend. No final solution came from the 4 counseling sessions. ' Client 0 - This 12 year old male had moved to Richmond from Alabama last year and wanted to return to be among his friends. Not doing well in school. Wants to wear his hair long and mod clothes but parents object. Strong religious beliefs. Seen3 times with some progress in solving~problems. Client P - A 13 year old boy with long history of asthma and resulting overprotection. Obsessed with idea of exercise to "build mYself up", talked readily with much emphasis on other boys "picking on me". Fears further rejection from friends. Afraid to actively compete with boys his age. Some time also spent with parents who competed witk each other in talking with counselor. All three . very verbose. Client wanted to continue counseling saying he feels better after sessions. Will probably return this fall if services are available. Client Q - A 17 year old male seen only once. History of running away from home. On l'grass" with parent's knowledge but not consent. Talked vaguely and unrealistically about starting a "new religion". Very "hippie" type. No apparent Progress. Rapport not'established. 'C~ient R - Very a~.~.~ractive 14 year old girl. Came to counseling after having run away and being picked up by Baltimore police and returned home. Parents had trouble in contrOlling her but she gave the appearance of being sorry about P~er behavior. Very polite and cooperative but counselor found out she some- times lied, ie, about drugs and behavior. Ran away for two months during sum~er. Called counselor upon her return and says she wants to start sessions again this fall. Client S - An 11 year old male, referred by school principal. Had been picked up for shop lifting. Seen~ed genuinely concerned. Paid back store keeper, l'grounded" by parents. Did not return for second appointment. MACK T. DANIELS CLERK LEE R. GORDON COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY CIRCUIT COURT CH ESTERFI ELD, VIRGINIA October 7, 1971 ERNEST P. GATES JUDGE DAVID MEADE WHITE JUDGE Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mel: I am enclosing a deed of dedication which I would appreciate your having the Board accept at the Wednesday Board meeting so that I may put it to record. I am also enclosing a letter to J. K. Timmons relative to the construction of this road. Please be advised that I have been informed by Mr. Timmons' office that he has the money in hand. Very truly yours, Oliver D. Rudy Commonwealth' s ~fttorney bhg Enc lo s ur e October 4, 1971 Mr. J. K. Timmons J. K. Timmons & Associates 1314 W. Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23220 Dear }-~r. Timmons: This letter is to confirm the understanding reached between the undersigned, Edward J. Willis, Jr., and the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, regarding tile dedication and improvement of Savoy Drive, shown as Parcel "B", 1.15 Ac, on plat of J. K. TImmons & Associates dated 6-4-71 (J. N. 8205), and the undertaking of your office in connection with said improvement. Your office has agreed to receive the sum of $14,500.00 as agent of the owner, t~is amo~u~t bei~g based on your estimate of the mot-to-be-exceeded cost ~o construct said road (without curb and gutter), to specifications acceptable to t~e Virgimia Department of Highways. Your offiae will acce~t bids, supervise and inspect work done, and pay contractors as the work ia completed, it bein~ understood that every effort will be made to minimize cost of completion. ~iindly sign the copy of tais letter acknowledging your undertaking and forward same to ~liver D. Rudy, Esquire. cc. Oliver D. Rudy, Esquire. Very truly yours, ~lobin ~. Willis 4600 }~est Broad Street Richmond, Virginia RxchmondAPZ~mouth Corp. 5300 Midlothian Turnpike Richmond, Virginia Ross Ford, Inc. Chester Virginia 23831 Strosnider C~ '~ Hopewell, Virginia Southside Dodge Co. Att: Mr. Bill Sheehen~ 323 E. Belt Blvd. Richmond, Virginia Dick Strauss Ford, In~.~ 155 Belt Boulevard Richmond, Virginia Universal Motor Company 1012 West Broad Street Richmond, Virginia _,, Cflevrol~ Motor Division Alan B Sigler, Distric~ Man P.O. Box ST Richmond, Virginia 23207 Te~ Curry ~o~ors, ~nc. 1800 East Washington Street Petersburg, Virginia Dominion Chevrolet Sales 6517 West Broad Street Richmond, Virginia Zmrick Chevrolet Sale~ 1807 Chamberlayne Ave~ RSchmond, Virginia F~rd ~otor Division P 0 Box 26984 ~m Richmond ~ ga 23261 Goyne Chevrolet, Inc Drawer H Chester, Va. 25851 Lawrence Chrysler-Plymouth Staples Mill Rd ~ Broad St Richmond, Virginia 25250 Martin Chevrolet Sales 214 Cowardin Avenue Richmond, Virginia Master Chevrolet Sales 55 East Bank Street Petersburg, Virginia P~tersburg Motor Company ~larket Street ~sburg, Virginia COLq.,Tf M~'n-th !y .... 'Equipment AMP~ITION Report- ... ~, Tear gas ~BLOOD TEST VIALS ..... FiASHLIGHT Grenade s Missiles _ Flare shells ~FLARES 'Polaroid 35hum film ~Ba tter ie s ~Bulbs film POLICE CARS-SPEEDOS~TER CARS IN SERVICE SPARES _ / Under Over Over 30,000 Over 35,000 Over 40,000 Over 45,000 Over 50,000 Over 55,000' Over 60,000 Over 65,000 Over 70,000 Over 75,000 R~ADiNGS 25,000 miles' 25,000 i",q I' :i i '-o0 c2 ;;a CZ 2C o .c.~ r'n C,,O ~, f','l 0 i 0 APPOMATTOX RIVER WATER AUTHORITY Petersburg, Vir gin~i& Report on For the Year Ended June 30, 1971 T~[E BOARD OF TKE APPOMATTOX RIVER WATER AUTHORITY Fred J. Swearingen, Chairman City of Colonial Heights, Virginia Robert Ritchie, Jr. Vice-Chairman County of Dinwiddie~ Virginia Melvin W. Burnett County of Chesterfield, Virginia Robert C. Klepper Secretary-Treasurer County of Prince George,. Virginia Lewis Z. Johnson, Jr. City of Petersburg, Virginia AUTHORITY STAFF Llcwellyn F. Rose Manager GENERAL COUNSEL Frank L. Wyche Prince George, Virginia CONSULTING ENGINEERS Wiley & Wilson Lynchburg, Virginia TRUSTEE United Virginia Bank/State Planters Richmond, Virginia TABLE OF CONTENTS June 30, 1971 THE REPORT OPINION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Construction Fund - Balance Sheet - Exhibit "A" Construction Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - ~xhibit "B" Operating Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "C" Debt Service Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "D" Water Revenue Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "E" Replacement Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - · Exhibit "F" Bond Redemption Fund - Statement of Fund Transactions - Exhibit "G" Investment in Water System Plant and Equipment - Exhibit "H" Bonded Debt - Exhibit "I" SC~2~ULES Construction Fund - Statement of Cash Receipts and Disbursements - Schedule 1 Special Construction Fund - Statement of Cash Receipts and Disbursements - Schedule 2 Operating Fund - Expenditures _ · Investments - SUPPT,EY~TARY I~fFORMATI ON Insurance in Force - COM~NTS PAGE 1 5 8 11 15 z7 18 19 Schedule ~ 20 Schedule 4 Schedule 5 2# 2.5 MITCHELL, WIGGINS & COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 206 PETERSBURG MUTUAL BUILDING PETERSBURG~ VIRGINIA 23803 733-5566 AREA CODE 703 August 3, 1971 Appomattox River Water Authority Petersburg Virginia Gentlemen: We have examined the financial statements of the Appomattox River Water Authority, as listed in the foregoing table of contents, for the year ended June 30, 1971. Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly included such auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The scope of our examination was sufficient to include all auditing re- quirements set forth in the Resolution dated as of November 4, 1964, pertaining to the issuance of water revenue bonds, and constituting a contract between the Appomattox River Water Authority and United Virginia Bank/State Planters, Richmond, Virginia, Trustee. By the authority of Section 508 of this Resolution, we are permitted to rely on reports of funds held by the Trustee~ furnished by the Trustee, without independent audit thereof. In our opinion, the statements listed in the foregoing table of contents present fairly the financial condition of the Funds of the Appomattox River Water Authority at June 36, 1971, and of the transactions and cash receipts and disbursements for the period then ended, in accordance with generally accepted principles of ac- counting. Further, it is our opinion that the Authority and the Trustee have faithfully perfomed their duties in accordance with the provisions of the subject Resolution. Yours very truly, MITCHELL, WIGGINS & COMPANY Certified Public Accountant CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1971 A S S E T S Cash- Trustee's principal account (Schedule 1) Investments (Schedule 4) TOTAL ASSETS EXHIBIT "A" $ 4 865 23 54 955 8O $59 821 03 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Due to Operating Fund (Exhibit "C") Fund balance - Unexpended funds (Exhibit "B") TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE $ 84 59 696 19 $59 .821 03 NOTE 1 At January 1, 1968, the water system construction was completed to the extent necessary to provide water supply service to the participating political subdivisions. Ail administrative and general expenses incurred by the Authority prior to that date were paid from the Construction Fund, and subsequent to January 1, 1968, such expenditures are regarded as Operating Fund expenditures. NOTE 2 There were no major contracts outstanding on which work was uncompleted at June 30, 1971. The "completion date" as contemplated in Section 507 of the Resolution (pertaining to the disposition of any' balance in the Construction Fund) ~had not been determined at June 30, 1971. CONSTRUCTION FUND STATEM!ENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1971 ~,XHZBIT "B" UNEXPENDED FUNDS - July 1, 1970 ADD: Earnings received on investments Earnings accrued on investments: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 ~ TOTAL AVAILABLE DEDUCT: Cash transferred to Special Construction Fund for expenditures UNE×PENDED FUNDS - June 30, 1971 CAPITALIZED CONSTRUCTION COSTS Disbursements of Special Construction Fund TOTAL CAPITALIZED CONSTRUCTION COSTS LESS: TRANSFER OF CAPITALIZED CONSTRUCTION COSTS TO FIXED ASSETS GROUP TOTAL FUND BALANCE - June 30, 1971 (Exhibit '~") ( 336 46) 104 97 $ 22 758 68 $ 79 264 96 189 91 $ 82 454 87 22 758 68 $ 59 696 19 $ 22 758 68 .$ 22 758 68 $ 59 696 19 0 PF. RATING FUND STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30. 1971 FUND BALANCE - July 1. 1970 ADD: Cash transfers from Water Revenue Fund (Ex.bit Due from Water Revenue Fund: June 30. 1970 June 30. 1971 TOTAL AVAILABLE DEDUCT: Operating expenditures (Schedule 3) Expenditures reimbursed and deposited in Water Revenue Fund FUND BALANCE - June 30. 1971 FUND BALANCE AT JU~ 30. 1971. REPRESENTED BY Cash - Authority's Operating Fund account Cash - Petty fund Due from Construction Fund (Exhibit "A" Due from Water Revenue Fund (Exhibit "E~') TOTAL ASSETS Less: Accounts payable $243 122 86 10 266 63) 14 506 80 $247 213 93 136 95 FUND BALANCE 5 EXHIBIT "C" $ 65 782 39 247 363 03 $313 145 42 247 ,350 88 ,$ 65 794 54 $ 63 195 79 50 00 124 84 14 506 80 $ 77 877 43 12 082 89 .$ 65 794 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS STATEMENT OF FUND -TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1971 PRINCIPAL Reserve for interest and principal on water revenue bonds - June 30, 1970 Add: Transfers from Water Revenue Fund TOTAL A¥~ILABLE - Principal De duc t: Interest paid Principal amount of bonds paid October 1, 1970 Excess cash transfer to coupon account (Due to Water Revenue Fund) Due to Water Revenue Fund (Distribution of income in excess of requirements) Accrued interest payable: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS - Principal Reserve for interest and principal on water revenue bonds - Jttne 30, 1971 INCOME Revenue: Earnings received on investments Earnings accrued on investments: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 TOTAL AVAILABLE - Income 'Deduct: Transfers of earnings received on investments to Water Revenue Fund Due to Water Revenue Fund for accrued earnings on investments:. June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS - Income 6 EXHIBIT "D" PAGE 1 $344 610 O0 419 605 O0 $764 215 O0 $312 505 O0 110 000 O0 950 00 ~ 900 oo ( 7S S~5 oo) 77 407 50 $423 917 50 ,$,340 297 50 $ 21 628 43 ( 5 121 08) 1 869 62 $, 18 376 97 628 43 ( 5 ~1 08) 1 869 62 ~ 18 376 97 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS ( Continued ) EXHIBIT "D" PAGE 2 BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1971 REPRESENTED BY Cash - Trustee's principal account Investments (Schedule 4) Amortized discount on investments transferred to income TOTAL ASSETS Less: Liabilities: Accrued interest on bonds payable Due to Water Revenue Fund RESERV~ FOR INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL ON 'WATER REtFEhTdE BONDS PRI NC I PAL $4147 081 34 $ 393 28 (_ 1 869 62). $419 605 O0 $ 77 407 50 1 900 O0 $340 297 50 ~ INCOME 1 869 62 1 869 62 1 869 62 Note: The required reserve for interest and principal on water revenue bonds at June 30, 1971 consists of: Interest due October 1, 1971 and April 1, 1972 Principal due October 1, 197~ TOTAL $230 297 50 110 000 00 $340 297.5.0 WATER REVE1VUE FUND 8 STATERflENT OF FUND TP~NSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1971 EXHIBIT "E" REVENUE Water service charges collected Water service charges receivable: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 Land lease Total revenue $764 558 01 ( 181 931 !6) 198 515 ~7 6 o00 0o $787 142 72 NONREVENUE Earnings on investments of Debt Service Fund.transferred Earnings on investments of Replacement Fund transferred Earnings accrued on investments of Debt Service and Replacement Funds: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 Retransfers from Replacement Fund Reimbursement of Operating Fund expenditures ~ae from coupon account for excess deposit Due from Debt Service Fund for excess transfers TOTAL AVAILABLE 21 628 43 6 279 12 ( 5 432 28) 2 503 70 174 688 04 136 95 950 ^~ 1 900 00 $989 796 68 TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS Operating Fund Debt Service Fund Replacement Fund Redemption Fund Total transfers DUE TO OTHER FUNDS $243 122 86 419 605 O0 235 554 i1 74 036 27 $972 318 24 -Operating Fund: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 Replacement Fund: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 Bond Redemption Fund: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 ($ 10'266 63) 14 506 80 ( 91 478 12) 50 O58 oo ( s5 ms 69) 140.277 08 i7 478 44 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS $989 796 68 WATER REVENUE FUND 9 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT June 30, 1971 NOTE 1 The Water Revenue Fund is held by the Trustee for the deposit therein of all revenues collected by the Authority except those designated for construction of the water system improvements. Periodic withdrawals from the Water Revenue Fund are made by the Trustee for the following purposes: The first priority of withdrawals from the Water. Revenue Fund is to provide an unencumbered balance in the Operating Fund equal to the amount of the operating expenses for the current month and for the next suc- ceeding three months as provided in the Operating Fund budget. The second priority of withdrawals from the Water Revenue Fund is to provide an amount to the Debt Service Fund so that the amount in the Debt Service Fund equals the unpaid interest that will become due on the first days of April and October, next ensuing, plus the amount of unpaid principal of outstanding bonds that will become due on the first day of 0ctober~ next ensuing. The third priority of withdrawals from the Water Revenue Fund is to provide an accumulated balance in the Replacement Fund of $200,000.00. Ail remaining funds held in the Water Revenue Fund are paid into the Bond Redemption Fund. At June 30, 1971, the amount due to the Operating Fund, computed on the accrual basis of accounting, was $14,506.80; due to the Replacement Fund, $50,058.00, and the balance, $140,277.08 is due to the Bond Redemption Fund. These amounts totaling $204,841.88 may be reconciled with the following assets of the Water Revenue Fund at June 30, 1971: Cash - Trustees! account Water service charges receivable Earnings accrued on investments of other funds Due from coupon account Due from Debt Service Fund $ 972 31 198 515 87 2 5o3 7o 950 O0 I 9OO O0 TOTAL $204 841 88 WATER REVENUE FUND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT l0 NO~ 2 (Continued) Revenues and investment income for the year ended June 30, 1971 totaled $812,121.69, computed on the accrual basis of ac- counting, as follows: Water service charges for consumption during the year ended June 30, 1971 Land lease revenue Earnings on investments $781 142 72 6 000 00 24 978 97 TOTAL $812 121 69 of: The annual revenue required under the Resolution consists Operating Fund expenditures Level debt service (110% of $435,000.00) TOTAL $247 213 93 478 500 00 .$725 713 93 REPLACEMEN~ FUND STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1971 11 EXHIBIT "F" FUND BALANCE - June 30, 1970 ADD: Transfers from Water Revenue Fund Due from Water Revenue Fund: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 Earnings receiv-ed on investments Earnings accrued on investments: June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 TOTAL AVAILABLE I~DUCT: Expenditures for replacements <Note) Accounts payable, June 30, 1971 (Note) Retransfers of Water Revenue Fund (Pursuant to Section 609 of the Resolution for pa~vnents to the Operating Fund and Debt Service Fund) Transfer of income from invest- ments to Water Revenue Fund FUND BALANCE - June 30, 1971 FUND BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1971 CONSISTS 0F Cash - Truste9's replacement account Investments [Schedule 4) Due from Water Revenue Fund (Distribution of income) (Exhibit "F.") TOTAL ASSETS Less: Accounts payable FUND BALANCE $200 000 00 235 554 ll ( 91 478 12) 5O O58 00 6 279 12 ( 311 20) 634 08 $400 735 99 $ 16 663 17 3 105 66 174 688 04 6 279 12 200 735 99 $200 000 O0 324 05 723 61 5o 058 oo $203 105 66 3 105 66 .$200 000 O0 REPLACEMENT FUND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 1971 12 NOTE Section 609 of the Resolution provides for the expendi- ture of money's for reasonable and necessary expenses with respect to the water system for major repairs, replacements or maintenance items of a type not recurring annually or at shorter intervals, recon- struction of parts of the system, and the construction of additions to or extensions of the system. A sum~aary of such expenditures for the year ended June 30, 197~ is given below: ACCOUNTS PAID PAYABLE TOTAL Repair of windstorm damage to canopy' over pumps at dam Repairs to surface wash out-lets and filter bed hoses Repairs to flocculator basin equipment Miscellaneous Replacement of chlorine c~lm.~d~ storage racks Fence Filter plant modifications Telemetry equipment $ 25o oo $ $ 25o oo 526 85 526 85 15 859 48 15 859 48 26 84 26 84 342 43 342 43 481 oo 481 0o 343 99 343 99 1 938 2~ 1 938 2~ TOTALS $16 663 17 $ 3 105 66 $19 768 83 The last three items in the foregoing tabulation, totaling $2,763.23, are additions to the system which have been capitalized in the Fixed Assets group. BOND REDEMPTION FUND STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS For the year ended June 30, 1971 13 EXHIBIT "G" FUND BALANCE - July 1~ 1970 ADD: Transfers from Water Revenue Fund Due from Water Revenue Fund (Distribution of income) (Exhibit "E"): June 30, 1970 June 30, 1971 Earnings accrued on investment _ June 30, 1971 TOTAL AVAILABLE DEDUCT: Cost of bonds purchased and retired - $50,000.00 face amount of 3.80% water revenue bonds due October 1, 2004 FUND BALANCE - June 30, 1971 FUND BALANCE AT JUICE 30, 1971 CONSISTS OF Cash - Trustee's Bond Redemption Fund Investments (Schedule 4) Due from Water Revenue Fund (Distribution of Revenue) TOTAL ASSETS $74 036 27 277 08 273 82 $ 85 618 69 128 968 48 $214 587 17 32 612 50 .$181 974 67 $ 1 784 90 39 912 69 140 277 o8 .$181 974 67 NOTE 1 The balance of the Bond Redemption Fund, $181,974.67, at June 30, 1971, has been computed on the accrual basis of accounting. Actual deposits to the Fund will be made on the basis of available cash as prescribed by Section 606 of the Resolution, relating to transfers from the Water Revenue Fund at such time as money is avail- able for such transfers. Requirements for transfers from the Water Revenue Fund to the Operating Fund or Debt Service Fund that are made subsequent to the balance sheet date have priority over the actual cash transfers to the Bond Redemption Fund, and reduce the amount that would be transferred if the accrual basis of accounting was prescribed for the actual transfers by the trustee. In August, 1971, $108,569.70 will be deposited in the Bond Redemption Fund. BOND REDE~PTION FUND STATEMENT OF FUND TRANSACTIONS (Continued) NOTE Section 610 of the Resolution provides that whenever the moneys held in the Bond Redemption Fund exceed $10,000.00, the Trustee may purchase bonds for redemption at prices not exceeding the redemption prices noted in Schedu].e "H". Whenever moneys in the fund exceed $100,000.00, the Trustee shall call bonds for rederaption at the earliest available date. Ail term bonds must be redeemed before any serial bonds may be retired by operation of the Bond Redemption Fund. 15 WATER SYSTEM PLANT AND EQUIPMENT CAPITALIZED COST OF CONSTRUCTION For the period April !0, 1961 to June 30, 1971 EX~ffIBIT "H" PAGE 1 TOTAL TO YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1970 JUNE 30, 1971 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION Engineering - Plans and specifications Engineering - Land clearing Engineering - Supervision and resident project representative Engineering - Administration of subcontracts Engineering - Extra services Bid advertisements Land surveying and topographic mapping Land appraisal and acquisition Site and water tessing Contract - Filter plant Contract - Dam Contract - Pipelines Contract - Roads Contract - Reservoir clearing Contract - Maintenance building Contract - Fences Contract - Emergency power system Electrical substation relocation Reservoir buoys and safety cables Filter plant modifications Gauging stations Pumping and pipeline modifications and parts Observation point and landscaping Boat dock Spillway and clearwell drains TOTALS (Forward) 82 69 - 82 69 146 760 35 146 760 35 9 221 55 - 9 221 55 21 081 27 - .21 081 27 729 10 - 729 10 '81 659 42 81 659 42 508 3~9 14 31 249 46 1 766 791 51 2 536 752 01 515 o82 286 50 508 6 5 64 5i 2~9 - 46 - 1 766 791 51 - 2 536 752 O1 - 315 082 618 244 ~2 618 2~ 42 658 80 - 24 638 80 7~2 O1 481 O0 7 225 O1 76 637 94 76 637 94 314 oo - 3o 314 o0 1~0 56 - 3 140 56 ll3 35 5 343 99 13 457 34 OO1 20 - i OO1 20 158 37 13 295 75 20 454 12 _ o5 - 3~ ..05. 895 2! - 3 895 21 $7 676 526 17 $19 407 24 $7 695 933 41 WATER SYSTEM PLANT AND EQUIPMENT CAPITALIZED COST OF CONSTRUCTION (Continued) 16 EXXqIBI T "H" TOTALS (Forwarded) TOTAL TO YEAR EEDED JUNE 30, 1970 JUNE 30, 1971 PAGE 2 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION (Continued) Damages Miscellaneous costs Supplies and chemicals Electric power Fuel oil Forestry consultant Legal fees - Bond counsel Bond printing Legal fees - General counsel Accounting and auditing fees Salaries a~ pay~o].l taxes Travel and meetings Office rental Telephone service Trustees' commissions Office supplies and expenses Insurance Utility building $767652617 $1940724 $769593341 TOTAL - WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTI ON MOBII,F. PLANT EQUIPMENT SMAT,T, TOOL% TRANSPORTATI ON Eq,UI PMENT COMMUNI CATIONS EQUIPMENT OFFICE FURNI~ AND EQUIPMENT ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT ON BONDS TOTAL INVESTMENT IN WATER SYSTEM . PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - June 30, 1971 I 089 54 - i o89 54 715 14 - 74179~ 7415 7 14 - 1795 ~3l - ~3l I ~90 O0 - i ~90 O0 7 - 7 50 5120o - 865# ~ 5 12 O0 03 2 7OO O0 - 2 7O0 O0 I 472 04 - I 472 Og 5 375 31 - 5 375 31 2 811 23 - 2 811 23 .2~ 413 O0 - - 315685 ~ ~ 8500 $777134098 $2256409 $779390507 295782 9 465 81 2 886 81 14 310 76 4 889 73 13 797 59 946581 288681 1I 35294 488973 1379759 .. 136 000 O0 - 136 000 00 $7 975 2%5 77 17 BONDS DATE OF PAYABLE., ISSUE Water Oct. 1, Revenue Bonds 1964 ( ote) AUTHOJ $2 54o io ooo co ~5 o00 oo ~0 000 O0 ~0 000 O0 ~5 o00 o0 )5 oo0 O0 )0 000 O0 EXHI. BIT "I" RATE PAYABLE 3.50% April 1 and October 1, semiannually <Water Oct. 1, Revenue Bonds 1964 (Note) 5 96o TOTALS AMOIINT PROVIDED FOR THE RETIREMENT OF BONDS AMOUNT TO BE PROVIDED FOR TH~ RETI~T OF BONDS $8 5oo TOTALS NOTE: The bonds are redeemable prior t upon thirty days published notic date not earlier than October 1, Authority's option, or by operat Redemption Fund at any interest than October 1, 1971, at the fol April 1 and October 1, semiannually PERIOD October 1, 1971 to October 1, 19 October 2, 1974 to October 1, 19 October 2, ~ to October 1, 19 October 2, to October 1, 19 October 2, 1989 to October 1, 19 October 2, 1994 and thereafter p CONSTRUCTION FUND STATEMENT 0F CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS For the year ended June 30, 1971 18 SCHEDULE 1 CASH BAIANCE - July 1, 1970 RE CEI PTS Disposition of investments Interest on investments of Construction Fund Refund of deposit on land acquisition suit TRANSFER OF INCOME TO PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT TOTAL RECEIPTS, BALANCE AND TRANSFER DISBURSEMENTS ~mrchase of investments Transfers to Special Construction Fund for construction costs TRANSFER OF INCOME TO PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS AND TPJ~NSFER PRINCIPAL INCOME 8 9~o 9~ $ - 4Ol 514 o~ - - 3 4~1 4o i 310 O0 - 3 4~1 4o - $415 166 37 $ 3 421 40 $387 542 46 $ - 22 758 68 - - 3 4~ 4o $410 301 14 $ 3 4~1 40 CASH BALANCE - June 30~ 1971 (Exhibit "A") SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FUND STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS For the year ended June 30, 1971 SCHEDULE 2 CASH BALANCE - July 1, 1970 CASH RECEIPTS Transfers from Construction Fund TOTAL 22 758 68 $22 758 68 CASH DISBURSEMENTS Construction costs paid CASH BALANCE - June 30, 1971 22 758 68 2O OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES For the year ended June 30, 1971 SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 1 BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL OVER UNDER* BUDGET OPERATION General operating supervision: Salary - Chief plant superin- tendent - Chemist - Maintenance mechanic 9 272 00 $ 9 322 O0 $ 9 654 00 9 704 O0 5 097 00 5 543 02 Total - General Operating supervision $ 24 023 00 $24 569 02 $ 5o oo oo O2 5~ o~ Source of supply expenses: Operating supplies and expenses 5oo oo $ - $ 500 00- Total - Source of supply exp~nses 5oo oo 500 00' Raw water pumping expenses: Power purchased Pumping supplies and expenses Maintenance of equipment $ 12 ooo oo $12 8~6 oo $ 120 O0 1 346 22 1 740 00 2 326 37 816 00 i 226 ss 586 37 Total - Raw water pumping expenses Purification expenses: Salaries and wages Purification supplies - Chemicals Purification supplies and expenses Power purchased Heating purification plant Maintenance of purification system - Building Maintenance of purification system - Equipment Total - Purification expenses $ 13 860 O0 $16 488 59 $ 2 628 59 $ 43 231 O0 946'671 12 $ 3 440 12 84 ooo oo 3 ooo oo 6 ooo oo 2 5OO O0 3 6oo oo 15 490 O0 87 230 08 4 825 32 4 026 24 2 592 87 2 921 89 4 961 77 3 230 08 1 825 32 1 973 76* 92 87 678 ll* 10 528 23* $157 821 O0 $153 229 29"$ 4 591 71' 21 0 PERATING FUND EXPENDTTURES (Continued) SCHEDULE 3 PAGE 2 BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL OVER UNDER * BUDGET OPERATION (Continued) Transmission expenses: Maintenance of equipment Maintenance of structures Maintenance of mains Maintenance of meters 9 2 400 00 $ 227 77 $ 2 172 23* 2 400 00 326 54 2 073 46* 360 00 10 00 350 00' 1 200 00 1 357 39 157 39 Total - Transmission expenses $ 6 360 00 $ 1 921 70 $ ~ 438 30* Contingencies 9 9 055 66 $ - $ 9 055 66* TOTAL OPERATION 9211 619 66 9196 208 60 $ 15 411 06* ADMINISTRATION AND GENERAL Administration: Salaries of general executives Other general office salaries Expenses of general executives and employees Stationery, printing and supplies Telephone, telegraph and postage Dues and subscriptions Miscellaneous and general expenses Maintenance of office furniture and equipment Maintenance of miscellaneous property' ooo oo 9 z2 ooo oo 9 - 932 oo 4 982 oo 50 oo 200 O0 692 24 507 76* 600 O0 736 24 136 24 4o0 O0 2 039 33 360 67* 30o oo ~54 ll 145 29* 200 00 597 68 602 32* 600 00 343 00 257 00- 200 00 - 1 200 00- Total - Administration $ 24 432 00 $ 21 545 20 $ 2 886 80* Services by others: Consulting engineer General counsel Auditor Trustee Total - Services by others 9 000 O0 $ 2 682 91 $ 682 91 000 00 3 749 00 749 00 2'400 oo 2 25o oo 150 00- 800 00 1 331 24 468 76* ,$ 9 2oo oo $ ~o 0!~ ~5 ~ s15 z5 22 OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES (Continued) SCKEDULE ~ PAGE 3 BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL OVER UNDER* BUDGET ADMINY_STRATION AND GENERAL Continued ) Miscellaneous: Insurance Social Security' taxes Employees' insurance - Hospitalization Reserve for overtime Reserve for sick leave $ ? 2oo oo $ 8 34o oo $ 1 14o oo 4 282 56 4 264 65 17 91' 2 364 48 2 250 86 113 62* 5 074 20 3 850 14 1 224 06* 1 014 60 741 33 273 27* Total - Miscellaneous TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND GEneRAL GRAND TOTAL $ 19 935 84 $ 19 43~6 98 $ 488 86* $ 53 567 84 $ 51'005 33 $ 2 562 51' $265 187 50 $247 213 93 $ 17 973 57* 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSURANCE IN FORCE June 30. 1971 24 SCHEDULE 5 PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY - BLARFKET COVERAGE COVERAGE Fire, lightning, storms, explosions and · riot Inland floater: Ail external risks to water pipelines ($1~500.00 deductib2e/ Boat ($50.00 deductible Radio equipment ($25.00 deductible) Tractor and equipment ($10.00 deductible) Automobile physical damage ($100.00 deductible) Comprehensive automobile liability: Bodily injury Property damge $2 000 000 O0 Comprehensive general liability: Bodily injury Property damage I1 343 ooo oo 2 200 O0 ~ 748 co 4 07~ oo Actual Cash Value Crime - Burglary Boiler business interruption PUBLIC OFFICIAL'S BOND - Robert C. Klepper, Treasurer BLANKET POSITION BOND - Members of the Board and employees of the Authority - Each person woRKMEN,s COMPENSATION $5OO 000 00 - $500 000 O0 - 000 000 00 5oo o0o co 2 000 000 O0 5OO 000 00 $ 250 O0 Schedule $ 2 500 O0 $ 2 500 O0 Standard COMMENTS HISTORY ~ The Appomattox River Water Authority is a public body corporate and politic, organized under the provisions of the Virginia Water and Sewer Authorities Act, by the governing bodies of the counties of Chesterfield, Dinwiddie and Prince George, Virginia, and of the City of Petersburg, Virginia, and the City of Colonial Heights, Virginia. A certificate of incorporation was issued by the State Corporation Commission of the Commonwealth of Virginia on November 21, 1960. The purpose of the Authority is to provide a supply of filtered water for the members of the Authority. The Authority is authorized to issue bonds payable solely from revenues to construct a water system, including an impounding reservoir dam, filter plant, pumping station, transmission mains and connections thereto, and access roads and parking areas, and to acquire sufficient land to provide a cleared area for the reservoir. The Resolution ~mder which the Authority has sold water revenue bonds in the aggregate amount of $8,500,000.00 requires that the funds described below will be held by the United Virginia Bank/ State Planters, Richmond, Virginia, as Trustee. CONSTRUCTION FUND The Trustee is required to hold, with suitable investment of excess cash, the monies received for construction of water system improvements until requisitions prepared by the Authority, with the approval of the Consulting Engineer (and the Legal Counsel in the case of land acquisitions) request the transfer of funds to the Special Construction Account for payment of all_proper costs of construction. 26 The use of the Construction Fund will continue until completion of the water system improvements, and any remaining amount not needed for construction or bond interest is to be transferred to the Bond Redemption Fund after such completion. DEBT SERVICE FUND The Debt Service Fund is held by the Trustee for the payment of principal of the water revenue bonds and the interest thereon when due. Four years' interest, $1,261,500.00, was set aside from the proceeds from the sale of water revenue bonds for the payment of interest during construction. At June 30, 1971, the debt service requirements due within one yea~ consisting of interest on water revenue bonds totaling $307,705.00 and $110,000.00 pringipal on serial bonds due October 1, 197~, has been provided from revenue prior to t~ balance sheet date. WATER REVENUE FUND The Water Revenue Fund is held by the T~ustee for the receipt of all revenues from the operation or ownership of the water system. Monies received are transferred by the T~ustee to the Operating Fund, Debt Service Fund, Replacement Fund and Bond Redemption Fund pursuant to the requirements for each of these funds, and in the priority as listed. REPLACEMENT FUND The Replacement Fund is to receive a maximu~n balance of $200,000.00 from the Water Revenue Fund, to be used for the reasonable and necessary costs of major repairs, replacements or maintenance of the system. Unencumbered funds of the Replacement A ~ 27 Fund are available for the transfer to and purposes of the Operating Fund or the Debt Service Fund. '-~ BOND REDEMPTION FUND The Bond Redenption Fund wilt receive from the Water Revenue Fund all monies not needed for the monthly requirements of the Operating Fund, the Debt Service Fund and the Replacement Fund. When the money held in this Fund exceeds $10,000.00, the Trustee may purchase bonds at a price not to exceed the applicable redemption price; when the money held in this Fund exceeds $100,000.00, the Trustee shall call bonds for redemption at the earliest redemption date. OPERATING FUND The Operating Fund is held under the control a~nd direction of the Authority for the payment of all expenditures related to operation of the water system, in accordance with appropriations included in the approved budget for this Fund. The cash balance is replenished at periodic intervals by transfers from the Water Revenue Fund, so that the unencumbered balance is equal to the budgeted expenditures of the current month and the next three succeeding months. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY 915 MUTUAL BUILDING · RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 TELEPHONE 649-8494 September 30, 1971 Honorable M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mr. Burnett: The Annual Report of the Richmond Metropolitan Authority for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971, is respectively sub- mitted in accordance with 33-255:44:28(d) of Chapter 178 of the Act of the Assembly, 1966, creating the Authority, a political sub-division and public body corporate and politic of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Authority is deeply appreciative of the continued sup- port and cooperation from both you and the Board of Supervisors in our efforts to provide this important trafficway facility for the Richmond Metropolitan Community. Sincerely, RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1971 ACTIVITIES The Authority, in its four .previous reports, has reported on its accomplishments and the status of the various plans in process through the close of the fiscal year ended June 30, -1970. The purpose of this report is to review the activities of the year ended June 30, 1971. MANAGEMENT The Authority is governed by a Board of Directors con- sist. ing of six members appointed by the Council of the City of Richmond (1), two members appointed by the Board of Super- visors of Chesterfield County (2), two members appointed by the Board of Supervisors of Henrico County (3), and one member from the State Highway Commission appointed by the State High- way Commission (4). OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS CHARLES A. TAYLOR (1) Chairman and Director HENRY G. CHESLEY, JR. (1) Four years beginning July 1, 1968 Four years beginning July 1, 1968 vice Chairman and Director A. J. BRENT Secretary and General Counsel PHIL J. BAGLEY, JR. Director RICHARD F. BATES (3) Director EDWIN B. BROOKS, JR. Director J. B..WILLIAMS (1) (1) Four years beginning July 1, 1968 Four years beginning July 1, 1968 (2) Four years beginning July 1, 1968 Four years beginning July 1, 1970 DAVID N. HUDDLE (3) Director LE ROY EAKIN, JR. (4) Director FRANK Go LOUTHAN, JR. (1) Director C. PORTER VAUGHAN, JR. (2) Director JAMES C. WHEAT, JR. (1) Director Four years expiring May 25, 1974 Four years expiring June 30, 1974 Four years beginning July 1, 1970 To serve until replaced Four years beginning July 1, 1970 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF GEORGE W. CHEADLE General Manager ALLEN G. McCABE, .JR. Comptroller Consulting Engineers Traffic Engineers Bond Counsel Certified Public Accounts Trustee Financial Advisors Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff Wilbur Smith and Associates Wood, King, Dawson, Love & Sabatine Arthur Young & Company First & Merchants National Bank White, Weld & Coo THE PROJECT The Authority's Project now includes a proposed system of limited access parkways and expressways approximately 10 miles in length with an additional 3.3 miles of the system along the Beltline designated as Interstate 195 to be built by the virginia Department of Highways. The location of the proposed system was approved by the Authority's Board of Directors on December 14, 1966. The designation of a part of the Beltline Expressway and Downtown Expressway as Interstate 195 was approved by the Federal Highway Administration on July 18, 1969. The various segments of the system are identified as follows: Operating Facility.: Boulevard Bridge Under construction.,. RMA (Section I): Powhite Parkway and James River Bridge Beltline connection to 1-195 Under construction, Virginia Department of Highways: Beltline Expressway (I-195) Future construction: Downtown Expressway Possible future construction: Riverside Parkway and Parham Road Extension A new four-lane toll plaza, equipped with automatic toll equipment, was opened on February 4. The new plaza provides two lanes in each direction at all times and provides a longer merging distance for south bound traffic. In addition, the small service building, together with the new toll booths, provides vastly improved working conditions for the toll attendants. The new facility has improved the handling of traffic through the toll plaza and has provided controls over revenue which were not possible under the old system in existance at the time of the acquisition of the bridge. FINANCING On December 30, 1970, the Authority accepted an offer for the sale of $51,300,000 7% Expressway Revenue Bonds to be dated January 15, 1971 and to be due January 15, 2013, for the construction of Section I of the Project. $21,000,000 of the proceeds were used to pay the Temporary Notes due April 15, 1971 and $1,200,000 to pay the note covering the purchase of the Boulevard Bridge. A statement of the financial condition of the Authority on June 30, 1971, with Report of Certified Public Accountant, is attached. cONSTRUCTION Bids were received on March 3, 1971 and three contracts totaling $17,793,272.40 were awarded on April 1, 1971 for the construction of Section One facilities with completion scheduled for January, 1973. Contract C-2 - Powhite Parkway - from Chippenham Parkway to the James River Bridge Contractors - Barnhill Contracting Co., Inc. Marks-Runnion Co., Inc. Contract Bid $7,695,203.11 Length 1.929 miles Roadways - (Limited Access)-- Chippenham Parkway to Forest Hill Ave. - 4 lanes divided Forest Hill Ave. to James River Bridge - 6 lanes divided Pavement Bituminous Concrete Interchanges Chippenham Parkway Forest Hill Avenue Grade Separations Chippenham Parkway Southern Railway Forest Hill Avenue Contract C-3 - James River Bridge from Powhite Parkway to. Beltline Connection Contractors - Moore Brothers Company, Inc. Moore Brothers Company Contract Bid Length Roadways - Design Loading Bridge type $4,640,686.70 0. 373 miles 6 lanes divided HS 20-44 - in accordance with standards of American Association of State Highway Officials. Welded steel girder stringers and reinforced concrete piers on rock-bearing foundations. Contra.c.t ~C~-~4_- Beltline Connection to Interstate Route 195 Contractor - D. W. Winkelman Co., Inc. Contract Bid $5,457,383.59 Length 0.988 miles Roadways---(Limited Access)--- 6 lanes divided Pavement Portland Cement Concrete Interchanges ~ Douglasdale Road-Cary Street Road Grade Separations R.F.&P. Railroad-Douglasdale Road ACCUMULATED 'C0NSTRUCTION COST DECEMBER 1966 - JUNE 30, 1971 Rights of Way Construction Contracts Engineering General and administrative; financial, etc. $16,413,304. 1,902,578. 5,228,014. 4,890,052. ~28,433,948. "Costs" as defined both in the Act creating the Authority and in the Trust Agreement includes, among other items, the following major catagories: Cost of construction Right of way, rights, easements, etc. Demolition or removal of buildings Machinery and equipment Financing charges, interest prior to, during, and for a period after construction Cost of traffic estimates, engineering, legal services, plans, specifications, etc. Administrative expenses Initial working capital Debt services reserves BOULEVARD BRIDGE TRAFFIC AND REVENUE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 vehicles 1971 Average Daily Cash Vehicles Tolls July $23,799. August 24,018. September 23,426. October 23,283. November 21,524. December 22,535. January 20,935. February 563,622 (1) 22,545 21,757. March 725,819 23,414 25,089. April 764,124 25,471 26,395. May 776,828 25,059 27,445. June 744,707 24,823 26,378. 1970 Cash Tolls 20,209. (2) 18,686. 17,784. 20,838. 20,619. 22,474. 22,527. (1) Automatic Toll equipment placed in operation Feb. 4 (2) Acquired Bridge Nov. 24, 1969 VEHICLES BY CLASS QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1971 Class ~pril May June I Cash Fare - 5¢ 527,595 563,471 538,260 II Cash Fare - 10¢ 65 51 37 III Passes - $7.50 per year 191,516 174,010 171,636 IV Special Permits 6,361 6,139 5,946 V& VI Other 38,587 33,157 28,828 Total 1,629,326 153 537,162 18,446 100,572 764,124 776,828 744,707 2,285,659 ARTHUR YOUNG ~ COMPANY 80! EAST MAIN STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219 The Board of Directors Richmond Me tropolitan Au thor&ty We have examined the accompanying balance sheet of Richmond Metropolitan Authority at June 30, 1971 and the related statements of revenues and operating expenses and changes in fund balances for the year then ended. Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. In our opinion, the statements mentioned above present fairly the financial position of Richmond Metropolitan Authority at June 30, 1971 and its revenues and operating expenses and the changes in its fund balances for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis con- sistent with that of the preceding year. In making our examination we obtained no knowledge that the Authority failed to comply with any of the terms, covenants or con- ditions contained in the Trust Agreement. However, it should be understood that our examination was not directed primarily toward obtaining such knowledge. Our examination has been made primarily for the purpose of ex- pressing an opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole. The accompanying supplementary information, although not considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position or results of operations, is presented for supplementary analysis purposes. It has been subjected to the tests and other auditing procedures applied in the examination of the financial statements mentioned above and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all respects material in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. July 23, 1971 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1971 ASSETS Repair and Revenue Contingency Fund Fund Cash Cash--held by trustee Cash--construction interest account Certificates of deposit, at cost Investments--held by trustee, at cost, approximately market I nves tmen ts --cons truc t ion interest account, at cost, approximately market Accrued interest receivable Due from other funds Prepaid expenses Boulevard bridge Deposits with court--condemnations Accumulated construction costs (Note 3) $ m m m 125,000 $ 5,000 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Accounts payable Accrued expenses, principally interest Due to City of Richmond (Note 4) Deferred income--tags Due to other funds Retained percentages on contracts Bonds payable, series 1971 (Note 5) Total liabilities 245,000 Fund balance Expressway Reserve Fund 110,194 125,000 $ 250,000 $ 110,194 125,000 250,000 $ 125,000 $ 250,000 m m 110,194 $ 110,194 See accompanying notes. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY BALANCE SHEET June 30, 1971 Funds Construction Fund $ 114,469 1,073,807 6,169 I00,000 17,344,961 Revenue Bridge Funds Reserve Construction Fund 32,836' m Fund Fund m m Total 262,499 1,073,807' 6,169 470,000 17,344,961 7,217,031 476,750 2,500 m 1,305,949 69,828 m m 14,119 28,433 ~948 ~ $56,145,412 $ 46,955 7,217,031 476,750 2,500 14,119 1,305,949 69,828 28,433,948 $56,677,561 $ 1,224,436 1,649,273 2,050,000 m m 190,754 51,300~000 56,414,463 ( 269~051) $56,145,412 $ 8,286 1,673 26,572 2,500 m 39,031 - 7,924 - $ 46,955 $ - $ - $ m m m $ 1,232,722 1,650,946 2,050,000 26,572 2,500 190,754 51,300,000 56,453,494 224,067 $56,677,561 See accompanying notes. 0 0 I I ,~ I O0 O0 O0 O0 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OPERATING EXPENSES For the year ended June 30, 1971 BRIDGE REVENUE FUND Revenues: Tolls Tags Operating expenses: Operations: Salaries and employee benefits Maintenance Equipment rental Other Administrative: Administrative fees--RNA Insurance Other Total °perating expenses $ 53,003 6,024 8,195 7~544 27,300 8,224 1,516. Excess of revenues over operating expenses* $ 288,966 42~324 74,766 37~040 $ 331,290 111,806 $ 219,484 *Before applying interest expense of $37,526. Fund. See Bridge Reserve See accompanying notes. RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 1971 Organization The Authority was created in 1966 by Act of the Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia. It is governed by a Board of Directors consisting of eleven members, six of whom are appointed by the Mayor of the City of Richmond, with the approval of the City Council, two each by the Boards of Supervisors of Henrico and Chesterfield Counties, and one ex-officio member appointed by the State Highway Commissioner. The organizational meeting of its first Board of Directors was held on July 15, 1966. The Authority will be responsible for construction of a toll expressway system to serve the Richmond metropolitan area. Expenditures made by the Authority for the expressway prior to placing it in service will be capitalized as cost of the project. In July 1969 the U. S. Department of Highways announced that the Beltline portion of the expressway would be included in the interstate system, and constructed by the Virginia Department of Highways (VDH). The VDH is purchasing from the Authority rights-of-way previously acquired by the Authority in this section and will reimburse it for some portion of the design costs. Accounting policies The accounts of the Authority are maintained on an accrual basis of accounting. Investments are stated at cost adjusted for amortization of discount and premium over the time re- maining to maturity. Cost of equipment is charged to con- struction costs at the time of purchase. No depreciation is recognized on the assets of the Authority. Accumulated construction costs Accumulated construction costs, net of interest earned, sales of property and other credits, at June 30, 1971 follow: RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTtlORITY NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 1971 (Continued) Amount Rights-of-way, etc. Engineering Construction contracts General and administrative, etc. $16,413,304 5,228 , 014 1 , 902 , 578 4~ ,890,052 $28 , 433 , 948 Pursuant to Section 8.13 of the trust agreement, the Authority sold, to the Virginia Department of Highways, rights- of-way which were not necessary for the project. (See Note 1) Proceeds from these sales amounting to $876,328 have been reflected in these statements as a reduction of cost of construction. Due to City of Richmond The Authority is obligated to repay the City of Richmond $2,050,000 without interest, from proceeds of future issuance of a second series of bonds. This represents $216,383 of preliminary expenditures made by the City for survey, engineer- ing studies, etc. and $1,833,617 advanced to the Authority by the City. Bonds payable Revenue bonds in a principal amount of $51,300,000 were issued under the terms of a trust agreement dated December 30, 1970. These bonds bear interest at the rate of 7% per annum and mature January 15, 2013. The trust agreement provides for the redemption of bonds, subject to certain requirements, prior to maturity. A portion of the proceeds from the bonds was used to pay temporary notes payable of $21,000,000 plus interest of the expressway construction fund and temporary notes payable of $1,200,000 plus interest of the bridge construction fund. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule RIC,_,,OND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITL STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS For the Year ended June 30, 1971 Balance, July 1, 1970 Receipts: Toil revenues Interest on investments Redemption of investments Balance returned by paying agent after payment of temporary notes Sale of series 1971 bonds Sales of land to Commonwealth of Virginia Transfers from bridge revenue fund Transfers from bridge reserve fund Other Revenue Fund $ Disbursements: Operating expenses Construction costs Investments purchased Accrued interest purchased Transferred to paying agent for payment of temporary notes and interest Payment of note Interest Payments made for bridge construction fund Transfers to bridge reserve fund Transfers to expressway reserve fund Other Balance June 30, 1971 Depositories: First and Merchants National Bank United Virginia Bank/State Planters Metropolitan National Bank Petty cash and change funds Expressw~_Z Repair and Contingency Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 95,000 _ 95,000 $ _ $ 5,000 m m 5,000 $ 5,000 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS For the Year ended June 30, 1971 Schedule 1 Funds Bridge Funds Reserve Constr~ction Revenue Reserve Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund m m m 106,000 4,194 m $ 144,506 $ 35,893 $ 67 - 327,842 - ' 467,742 - 14,758 - 4,176,980 _ 617 - 2,082,440 - - 50,321,595 - - 876,328 - - _ - 33,516 74,668 - - 110,194 _57,999,753 327~842 110,194 58,144,259 363,735 m m - 107,856 3,072,874 - 28,606,315 - 132,327 - 23,931,201 - 1,200,000 - - 83,527 - 33,516 - 106,000 7,097 - ...56,949,814 330,899 $ 1,194,445 $ 32,836 48,891 48,9 58 m 44,764 4,194 48,9 58 $ - $ 110,194 $ 110,194 $ 110,194 $ 1,182,212 $ 8,300 12,183 - - 22,526 50. 2,010 $ 1,194,445 $ 32,836 RICHMOND METROPOLITAN AUTtIORITY INVESTMENTS HELD BY TRUSTEE June 30, 1971 Schedule 2 Description Face Interest Amount Maturity Rate Construction account: Federal Home Loan Bank $ 2,280,000 Federal National Mortgage Association 1,230,000 United States treasury Bills 600,000 Certificates of deposit: Bank of Virginia 1,000,000 Central National Bank 2,300,000 Metropolitan National Bank 1,000,000 United-Virginia Bank/ Spotswood 500,000 United Virginia Bank/ Fairfax 1,000,000 United Virginia Bank/ State Planters 2,400,000 Bank of Virginia 1,000,000 Central National Bank 2,000,000 Southern Bank and Trust Company 500,000 Metropolitan National Bank 500,000 Bank of Virginia 1,000,000 $17,310,000 Construction interest account: United States TreasuryBills $ 1,830,000 United States Treasury Bonds 308,500 Certificates of deposit: First National Exchange Bank--Roanoke 1,000,000 Central National Bank 795,500 United Virginia Bank/ State Planters 795,500 Bank of Virginia 1,000,000 Bank of Virginia 1,000,000 Metropolitan National Bank 500,000 $ 7,229,500 7-27-71 12-11-71 8-12-71 1-15-72 1-15-72 1-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 7-15-72 1-15-73 7-8 -71 12-15-72 1-10-72 1-10-72 7-10-72 7-10-72 1-10-73 1-10-73 7.50% 7.20% 5.o5% 4.71% 5.05% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 5.30% 4.76% 4.75% 5.30% 5.30% 4.625% 4.61% 4.75% 5.30% 5.30% 5.20% Cost Basis $ 2,285,937 1,263,441 595,~83 1,000,000 2,300,000 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 2,400,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 500,000 500,000 1,000~000 $17,344,961 $ 1,828,267 297,764 1,000,000 795,500 795,500 1,000,000 1,000,000 500~000 $ 7,217,031 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVING. HORNER, CHAIRMAN CLOVER HILL DISTRICT C. J. PURDY BERMUDA DISTRICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HERBERT O. BROWNING,VICE CHAIRMAN F. F. DIETSCH ANDREW R. MARTIN OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA M. W. BURNETT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY September 27, 1971 Mr. M. W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: Reviewing the County Code relative to real estate assess- ment, I wish to call your attention to Section 11-8, Paragraphs B & C. When the Code was drafted, Chesterfield County was collect- ing real estate taxes annually. We now collect taxes semi-annually, hence the above cited paragraphs no longer apply. Therefore, I suggest the first sentence of Paragraph B, be changed to read; "The real estate assessment office shall notify each affected taxpayer in writing on or before the fifteenth day of Feoruary of any year in which a new or changed assessment for such property is made or proposed by the Assessor." This will in- form the taxpayer of an assessment change three months in advance of the June 5th payment date. In the first sentence, Paragraph C, the taxpayer has thirty days to protest the assessment notice. I feel this period is not a sufficient time and should be extended. If complaints can be confined to a specified length of time, instead of stretching over the entire year, the process of review and correction can be expedited. Sufficient safeguard has been provided for unusual circumstances in the last sentence of Para- graph C. - 2 - Therefore, I suggest that the first sentence of Paragraph C be re-written as follows: "Any owner of real property or affected taxpayer, any person with a substantial legal or equitable interest in the property in- volved, or any authorized representative of the County Board of Supervisors may file protest against any assessment affecting such property within sixty days after the date of notice." It is my wish that these changes be considered and included in the County Code. Respectfully submitted: James C. /Falconer, Real Estate Assessor JCF/fc 4'22 THIS DEED OF DEDICATION, made this 16th day of September, 1971, by and between EDWARD J. WILLIS, JR. and ROBIN W. WILLIS, his wife, parties of the firs~ part; and the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, party of the second part; WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and the mutual benefits accruing or to accrue to the first and second parties, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, parties of the first part do hereby dedicate, grant and convey for public use, with GENERAL WARRANTY and English covenants of title, unto the party of the second part, the following described property, to-wit: ALL that certain parcel of land, lying and being in Midlothian District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 1.15 acre, being designated as Parcel "B" on a certain "Plat Showing Three Parcels of Land . . ." dated June 4, 1971, made by J. K. Timmons & Associates, Civil Engineers, Richmond, Virginia, attached hereto. BEGINNING at the intersection of the east line of Greenfield Drive with the south line of Savoy Road; thence running along the south line of Savoy Road S 75° 28' 32" E 135.66 feet to the true point of beginning; thence N 14° 31' 28" E 50.00 feet to a point on the north line of Savoy Road; thence S 75° 28' 32" E 152.00 feet to a point; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 613.30 feet, a distance of 658.30 feet to a point; thence S 13° 58' 32" E 106.65 feet to a point; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 245.53 feet, a distance of 96.09 feet to a point; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 645.95 feet, a distance of 72.38 feet to a point; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 25.00 feet, a distance of 35.62 feet; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 295.53 feet, a distance of 93.67 feet to a point; thence N 13° 58' 32" W 106.65 feet to a point; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 563.30 feet, a distance of 604.63 feet; thence N 75° 28' 32" W 152.00 feet to the point and place of beginning, all as shown on aforesaid plat by J. K. Timmons to which reference is hereby made. BEING a part of the same property devised to Edward J. Willis, Jr. from Edward J. Willis by his will dated June 11, 1941, and probated October 7, 1941, in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virginia, and duly recorded in Will Book 39, page 486. This conveyance is made subject to restrictions, easements and condition. of record insofar as they may be lawfully applicable to the property hereby conveyed. 423 This conveyance to the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, is made in compliance with Section 15.1-286 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and is approved by the Commonwealth's Attorney as to form, and accepted on behalf of~ the Board of Supervisors by resolution of the Board duly adopted, as certified by its Clerk, authorized to so act, as evidenced by their affixing their signa- tures to this deed of dedication. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: Edward J. Willis, Jr. Ro~in W. Willis (S~.AL) (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: C~,Commonwealth, s Attorney ACCEPTED: CHazrman, B6ard ~f Supervisors Cle' STATE OF VIRGINIA, CITY OF RICHMOND, to-wit: I, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the City and State aforesaid hereby certify that Edward J. Willis, Jr. and Robin W. Willis, his wife, whose names are signed to the foregoing deed of dedication dated September 16, 1971, have acknowledged the same before me in my jurisdiction aforesaid this ~ day of ~ 1971. My commission expires: !1~ [~ 7 ~ --2-- STATE OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, to-wit: I, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the County and State afore- Morris E. Mason, Asst. said, hereby certify that ~$~Y~x~x~ whose name is signed as/Commonwealth's Attorney to the foregoing deed of dedication dated September 16, 1971, has acknowledged the same before me in my jurisdiction aforesaid this ~ day of ~ ..... ~ar 1971 My commission expires: ~ //_~ .... /~/~'~/ . STATE OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, to-wit: I, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the County and State afore- said, hereby certify that Irvin G. Hornet, whose name is signed as Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to the foregoing deed of dedication dated September 16, 1971, has acknowledged the same before me in my jurisdiction aforesaid this ~-7 day of ~, 1971. My commission expires: STATE OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, to-wit: I, the undersigned Notary Public in and for the County and State afore- said, hereby certify that M. W. Burnett, whose name is signed as Clerk to the foregoing deed of dedication dated September 16, 1971, has acknowledged the same before me in my jurisdiction aforesaid this 2~ day of ~_~~, 1971. My commission expires :~~~M~~-/~' // // ,t. the C~erk's Off~ce of tt~e Circuit Court of Ch~te~ield County, the ~~ay ot...~~_., ~9.2~.., this Deed was pre. sent~ and the ceaificat~mitted to record at/,,~:a~'clocK_~_M, Education Chesterfield Association October 6~ 1971 Mr. Melvin W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 2585£ Dear Mr. Burnett: In a recent meeting of the Executive Committee and the Representative Council of the Chesterfield Education Association the following resolution was unanimously approved: "Recognizing the sacredness of contracts agreeably entered into by all parties and because of the gross inequities of the implementation of the President's wage-price freeze, the Chesterfield Education Association, an affiliate of the Virginia Education Association and the National Educa- tion Association, urges the Chesterfield County School Board to hold in escrow all monies frozen under the President's wage-price freeze and to make every effort to honor the centracts signed in the Spring, 1971 at the earliest possible date. It is further recommended that copies of this resolution also be sent to the Superintendent of Chesterfield County Schools, Chairman of the Ches- terfield County School Board, Chairman of the Chesterfield County Bo~dl of Supervisors, Chairman of Virginia State Board of Education, State Super- intendent of Schools in Virginia, Governor of Virginia, President of the United States, Vice-president of the United States, President and Executive Secretary of the Virginia Education Association, and President of the Nat- ional Education Association." Ches terfie ld Education Assoc. VE/mc RESOLVED that if the Executive Secretary of Chesterfield County is called to testify in the Curtis Holt suit and asked the attitude of the County to the deannexation of the territory awarded to Richmond effective January 1, 1970, that he be authorized to inform the Court that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield has been advised by its financial advisors that the County is capable of assuming any legal obligations that may fall upon it as a result of such action and that the Board would welcome the opportunity to reassume jurisdiction of the annexed ar em. ¥