Loading...
12-08-71 Packet 746 THIS DEED, Made and entered into this 30th day of November, 1971, by and between CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, INC., a New York corporation, party of the first part, and COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, party of the second part; WITNESSETH: That, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, cash in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the said party of the first part doth hereby grant and convey, with SPECIAL WARRANTY, unto the said party of the second part the following described property, to wit: Ail that certain tract or parcel of land containing 91.13 acres, more or less, lying and being in Dale Magisterial District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, about one (1) mile in a northeasterly direction from Chesterfield Courthouse, and being the remaining portion of a 160-acre tract of land (surveyed out 156.80 acres) conveyed to the party of the first part by deed from Roy E. Tucker and wife, dated November 30, 1953, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Deed Book 432, page 379, a 65.67-acre tract having been conveyed off the original tract by Continental Can Company, Inc., to the County School Board of Chesterfield County, Virginia, by deed dated November 18, 1968, recorded in th~f~resa~d Clerk's Office in Deed Book 945, page 429. This conveyance is made expressly subject to all existing conditions, reservations and easements of record affecting the said land and to such matters as may be disclosed by a physical survey of the property. This conveyance to the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, is made by the party of the first part pursuant to Chapter 795 of the Acts of Assembly of 1968 and in compliance with Section 15.1-286 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, and is approved by the Commonwealth Attorney as to form, and accepted on behalf of the Board of Supervisors by resolution of the Board, duly adopted, as certified by its Clerk, authorized to so act, as evidenced by their signatures to this deed. For a period of two (2) years from the date of this deed, there is excepted and reserved unto the party of the first part, its successors and assigns, all timber of any size and description on the land hereby conveyed together with full rights to enter upon said land and to do all things neces- sary for the purpose of cutting and removing the timber therefrom. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has caused these presents to be executed on its behalf by its Vice President, and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed, attested by its Assistant Secretary, pursuant to due authorization of its Board o{ Directors, all as of the ~ay~ month and year first above written. ~"x A~s~stant Secretary STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK, to wit: I, ~)ok~. [[~t~i~ ~/(.¢~.~e~ .... , a notary public in and for the county and state aforesaid, do hereby certify that ~ ~¢~'f~.~ - and 0 ~ ~%~c _, Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respec- tively, of CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, INC., whose names are signed to the fore- going writing, bearing date on the 30th day of November, 1971, have severally acknowledged the same before me in my county and state Given under my hand and NOTARIAL SEAL this ]~ day of My commission expires (SEAL) to rom. The foregoing instrument hereby approved and aeeepte~ :~'~'" ",t,, Commonwealth Attor ~n~y, Chesterfield County, Virginia I hereby certify that the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield conveyance by resolution duly adopted. /~/ ,..-- ..-~-'~,..., ..'5~ ~ / / " EXECUTIVE-. SECRETARYJ (~icle) Page 2. V IRG IN IA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY IN RE: Purchase by the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, of a parcel of land in Dale District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, containing 91.13 acres, owned by Continental Can Company for use in connection with the expansion of the Chesterfield Courthouse complex. REPORT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE AFORESAID COURT: Pursuant to the Order entered by this Court, I was directed to examine title to the above referenced property, said property owned by Continental Can Company in Dale District, being more particularly described in the deed to which this report is annexed, and therefore I wish to report that I have examined the records in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of this County and do report that title to the above property is now vested in Continental Can Company. In my opinion, title to the above property is free and clear of all valid objections, except as follows: 1. Taxes for 1972 and subsequent years. 2. EASEMENT: August J. Krause and Gracie L. Krause, his wife, to Virginia Electric and Power Company, dated August 24, 1949, recorded September 21, 1949, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County, Virginia, in Deed Book 342, page 369. Grants right, privilege and easement of right of way to construct, operate and maintain a pole line for transmission and distribution of electricity, etc. over, upon and across property oJ owners in Chesterfield County. 3. In the deed from Continental Can Company, a New York corporation, to the County School Board of Chesterfield County, Virginia, the grantor, Continental Can Company, Inc., reserves unt~ itself, its successors and assigns, an easement fifty (50) feet in width along the northern line of the hereindescribed property, as shown on the attached Plat, for the purpose of ingress and egress to the remaining lands of said grantor; which easement shall contil until such time as the remaining lands of the grantor shall have frontage on a public road, constructed, completed, and maintained with hard surface which is a part of the county highway system. ~e Dpon the availability, as herein set forth, of a public road frontage to the remainder of the grantor~s lands, the said SO-foot e~sement shall e~pire, At the option of the grantee, or its assigns, the said 50-foot easement may be dedicated to a public road right of way concurrent with construction of an improved and hard surface road thereon. 4. Rights of upper and lower riparian owners in and to the waters of Proctor's Creek and the natural flow thereof and title to that portion of the insured property that may be embraced within the portion of said creek where it constitutes the southern property line. I have examined the deed conveying this property to the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, embracing the land described therein and when the same has been recorded, the County of Chesterfield will acquire good title as to the property described therein, subject to the objections noted above. December ~%, 1971 Respectfully submitted, Page 1 of 2 CLEAN STREAMS PROVIDE HEALTH ~A~r.r_ALT H AND STA1 r: WATER CONTROL BUARD P. O. Box 11143, 4010 W. Broad St.. Richmond, Virginia 23230 - (703) 770-2241 A, H. Paessler, Executive Secretary CERTIFICATE NO. 2156 Issued on November 12, 1971 by the State Water Control Board Pursuant to Chapter 3.1 Title 62.1, Code of Virginia, of 1950, as Amended To: Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Matoaca Area Sewage Lagoon BOARD MEMBERS Noman M. Cote, Jr, Chairman Ray W. Edwards Hemp/S. Holland II Mrs. Wayne Jackson Andrew W. McThenia, Jr. W. H. S;ngleton Robert W. Soessard An "owner" as defined in the Law, to construct and operate a sewerage system and sewage treatment works (hereinafter referred as "facilities") and discharge the treated effluent intd Old To~n Creek, Section 6, James River Basin upon the follc~ving terms and conditions: 1. The facilities shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the State Department of Health by letter of April 15, 1969, and by the State Water Control Board by letter ballot No. 1825, dated April 25, 1969, and by ratification at its meeting of June 10, 1969, as contained in Minute /~8, from the proceedings of that meeting. The approval of plans and specifications does not relieve the owner of the responsibility of operating the plant in a reliable and consistent manner to meet the plant performance requirements in the certificate. If plant design deficiencies are identified in the future which could affect the plant performance or reliability, it shall be the responsibility of the owner to correct such deficiencies forthwith as may be dlrected by the State Water Control Board. 2. Plant performance requirements (al The average daily flow shall not exceed 123,300 gallons per day for any one calendar month. 1. When the average flow influent to a sewage treatment works for any consecutive three-month period reaches 80~; (99,000 gallons per day) of the State Water Control Board approved design capacity, the owner shall submit to the Board within 90 days an ana)ysis of projected loadings and shall submit proposed plans for increasing the treatment works capacity, inc)uding proposed methods of financing, un)ess the owner can demonstrate, in writing to the satisfaction of the Board or its staff, that an increase in treatment capacity is not required at that time. When the average flow influent to a sewage treatment works for any consecutive three-month period reaches 95~J (llT,000 gallons per day) of the State Water Control Board approved design capacity, the jurisdictions using this plant shall terminate the issuance of permits which allow start of construction on projects in the affected area and shall submit a plant expansion program to the Board for its review and approval before granting any additional such permits. Page 2 of 2 Certificate No. 2156 issued on November 12, 1971 (b) The average BOD5 in the plant effluent shall not exceed gq milligrams per liter for any one calendar month. (c) The average suspended sol ids in the plant effluent shall not exceed 2/~ mllli§rams per llter for any one calendar month. The plant design data is contained in Attachment "A" for informational purposes and is not a part of this certificate. 3. The operation of the facilities of the c~vner herein certificated shall not contravene the Water Quality Standards, as amended and adopted by the Board, or any provlslon of the State Water Control Law. q. The facilities shall be operated so as not to endanger the public health and not create a nuisance. 5. Sufficient operation and maintenance shall be practiced on the facilitles herein certificated at all times to insure effluent quality in accordance with the terms of this certificate and to enable adequate inspection of the facilities to be made by authorized persons. The o~ner is respons|ble for securing personnel qualified to operate and maintain the plant to meet the terms pf this certificate. 6. Should any unusual or extraordinary discharge of wastes to State waters occur from the facilities herein certificated, the c~vner shall immediately advise the Board and its staff by telephone or telegram, to be confirmed by letter, giving all available details, including known adverse eff:ects on any water uses. 7. AIl solids or other wastes not expressly herein approved for discharge shall be so deposited that they do not reach State waters by natural or other means. 8. The owner shall obtain and record such information on the receiving stream and such other State waters affected by the discharge as requested by the Board or its staff. Such information shall be subject to inspection by the Boardls authorized representatives and shall be submitted with such frequency and in such detail as to be satisfactory to the Board or its staff. 9.' Plant reporting requirements: (a) The sampling, analysis, and reporting program to demonstrate compllance with the certificate shall conform to State Water Control Board requ| rement s. (b) The sampling and analysis program for operatlo~al control shall be performed at such frequency and in such detail as required by the Board or lts staff. Records on the operation of the facilities shall be malntained by the owner and shall be submitted in such detail and at such intervals as requested by the Board or its staff. IO. This certificate cannot be transferred or assigned. Any new c~ner or successor in interest to the above owner must make application for a new certificate prior to assuming c~vnership and commencing operations. 11. The Board may revoke or amend this certificate for good cause and after proper hearing with at least thirty days' notice to the owner of the time, place, and purpose thereof. If a proposed revocation or amendment of this certificate is mutually agreeable to the Board and the owner, the hearing and notice may be dispensed with. Executive Secretary I hereby acknowledge the receipt of an accept the conditions of the certificate. ~ _~~~,~r~.~ ~ Title ~ Date e ATTACHRENT ~lA~' The plant is designed for the following raw wastewater concentrations: (a) An average BODq of 2/~0 mii1Igrams per liter at the design flo~ for any one calendar month. (b) An average suspended solids of 2~0 milligrams per liter at the design flo~ for any one calendar month. Based on the influent loadings above, the plant is designed for the following reductions: (a) 90 percent BOD5 removal (b) 90 percent suspended solids removal CERTIFICATE NO, 1822 Issued on llowmb~.r 15, 1971 BOARD MEMBERS by the State ~'/ater Control Board Pursuant to Chapter 3.11 Title 62.1, Code of Virgin|a, of 1950, as Amended To: Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Cheste '"' ' Virg|nJa Noman M. Cole, Jr. Chairman Ray W. Edwards Henry S. Holland III Mrs. Wayne J~:ckson Andrew W. McThenia, Jr. W. H. Singleton Robert W. Spesssrd Ashton Creek Sewage Lagoon CLEAN STF~EAM$ HEALTH WEAl. TH An "owner'~ as defined in the Law, to construct and onerate a sewerage sT'stem and sewage treatment works (hereinafter referred as "facilities:') and discharg~ the treated effluent into Ashton Creek, Section 2b, James River Basin upon the following terms and conditions: l, The facilities shall be constructed in accordance wlth plans and specifications a?proved by the S - · ta~e Department of H~alth by letter of Septembe: 30~ ¢' ~ 196o, and by the State Water Control Board at ~s meting of October ~, I~66, as cuntained ~n tl~nute ~3, ~rom the proceedlngs of ~hat ~veetlng. The approva} of plans and specifications do~s not relieve the owner of the responsibility of operating the plant in a reliable and consistent manner to meet the plant requir~m ..... L, ~n thc certificcte. IF plant design def~clencics identified ~n the future which could affect the plant performance or reliability, ~t shall be the responsibility of the owner to correct such d~ficiencies forthwith as may be directed by the State Water Control Board. 2. Plant performance requirements (a) The average daily flow shall not exceed 1~00,000 gallons per day for any one calendar month. 1. ~4hen the average flow influent to a sewage treatment works for any consecutive three-month period r~aches 80% (320,000 gal ions per day) of the State Water Control Board approved d~sign capacity, the ~,vner shall submlt to the ~oard w~thir~ 90 days an analysis of projected ]oadlngs and shail submit proposed p]ar, s for increasing the treatment works c,apaclty, including proposed method~ of financing, unless the ~ner can demonstrate, in writing to the satisfaction of the Board or its staff, that an increese in treatment capacity is not required at that time. 2. When thc average flow influent to a sewage treatment works for any consecutive three-month period reaches 95% (380,000 gallons per day) of the State Water Contro~ Board approved design capacit, y, the jurisdictions using this p~ant shall terminate the issuance of permi ts v,,.Jch allow start of construction on projects Jn the affected area and shsI1 submi~ 8 plant expansion progra~ to the Board for its review and 8pprovsJ before grantino additional such pern'dts. Page 2 of 2 Certificate No. 1822 i~.~ued or~ November 15, 1.971 (b) The average BODr. in the plant effluent shall not exceed 48 milligrams per :~iter for any one calendar month. (c) The average suspended solids in the plant effluent shall not exceed 48 milligrams per ]iter for any one calendar month. The plant design data is contained in Attachment "A" for informational purposes and is not a port of this certificate. 3. The operation of the facilities of the c~.vner.herein certificated shall not contravene the Water Quality Standgrds, as amer~ded and adopted by the Board, or any provision of the State Water Control Law. 4. The facilities shall be operated so as not to endanger the public health and not create a nuisance. 5. Sufficient operation and maintenance shall be practiced on the facillties herein certificated at all times to insure effluent quality in accordance ~ith the terms of this certificate and to enable adequate inspection of the facilities to be made by authorized persons. The owner is responsible for securing personnel qualified to operate and maintain the plant to meet the terms of this certificate. 6. Should any unusual or extraordinary discharge of wastes to State waters occur from the facilitles herein certificated, the owner shall immediately advise the Board and its staff by telephone or telegram, to be confirmed by letter, giving all available details, including kn~,~n adverse effects on any water uses. 7. All solids or other wastes not expressly herein approved for discharge shal! be so deposited that they do not reach State waters by natural or other means. 8. The owner shall obtain and record such information on the receiving stream and such other State waters affected by the discharge as requested by the Board or its staff. Such information shall be subject to inspection by the Board's authorized representatives and shall be submitted with such frequency and in such d~tail as to be satisfactory to the Board or its staff. 9. Plant reporting requirements: (a) The sampling, analysis, and reporting program to demonstrate compliance with the certificate shall conform to State Water Control Board specification C-1. (b) The sampling and analysis program fOr. operational con'~r0l shall be performed at such frequency and in such detail-as required by the Board or its staff. Records on the operation of the facilities shall be maintained by the owner and shall be submitted in such detail and at such intervals as requested by the Board or its staff. 10. This certificate cannot be transferred or assigned. Any new ~vner or successor in interest to the above owner must make application for a new certificate prior to assuming c~,~nership and commencing operations. 11. The Board may revoke or amend this certificate for good cause and after proper hearing with at lc~st thirty days' notice to the owner of the time, place, and purpose thereof. If a proposed revocation or amendment of this certificate is mutually a~3reeable to the Board and the ~z~zner, the hearing and notice may be dispensed with. Executive Secretary I hereby acknowledge the receipt of and accept the conditions of the certificate. Date ATTACH HE NT "A" The plant is designed for the following raw wastewater concentrations: (a) An average BOD5 of 240 milligrams per liter at the design flow for any one calendar month. (b) An average suspended solids of 240 milligrams per liter at the design flow for any one calendar month. Based on the influent loadings above, the p]ant is designed for the following reductions: (a) 80 percent BOD5 removal (b) 80 percent susj~ended solids ren~val STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD SPECIFICATION C-1 SUMMARY PERFORMANCE REPORT The owner must submit to the State Water Control Board by the lOth of each month a summary of the plant's performance for the previous month, the previous three months, and the previous twelve months. A copy of the report- ing form is attached. This form is to be submitted in addition to the regular monthly report of operation~ which will be submitted in the same manner as in the past. Any owner whose plant exceeds State Water Control Board approved limits will be subject to appropriate action under the State Water Control Law. 0 0 · 0 <2> o RESOLUTION THIS DAY the Board considered the request of The Salisbury Corporation to abandon a small portion of a drainage easement traversing Lot 10, Block W, Section B-l, Salisbury, provided The Salisbury Corporation convey unto the County a perpetual drainage easement on a new location and the Board examined the papers prepared conveying said easement to The Salisbury Corporation and the conveyance by The Salisbury Corporation to the County of a perpetual drainage easement as aforesaid. NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of ~",/37~ ~ ~.~ ~ ' seconded by ~?¥ ~!~ ~ C ~ , BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman and Clerk of this Board are authorized to execute the deed conveying the said easement to The Salisbury Corporation and to deliver said deed to it upon the simultaneous delivery of the new easement. A ~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JRVIN G. HORNER, CH^~RMAN CLOVER HiLL DISTRICT C. J. PURDY BERMUDA DISTRICT J. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT BOARD Of SUPERVISORS F. F. DIETSCH MANCHESTER DiSTRiCT HERBERT O. BROWNING M ATOACA DiSTRiCT ANDREW B. MARTIN M[DLOTHIAN DISTRICT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, rOBERT'A. PAINTER, COUNTY ENGINEER M.W. BURNETT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY ENGINEERING AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT VIRGINIA December 2, 1971 Mr. Jerry Jewett Attorney-at-Law, County of Chesterfield, Chesterfield, Va. Re: Map Section: 7-6 Property: The Salisbury Corporation, A Virginia Corporation Dear Jerry: Attached, please find the original and one copy of Drainage Easement Agreement crossing the above property. This has been prepared at the request of Mr. J. K. Timmons, and he has requested that you proceed with the vacation of the original location of this easement. Sincerely, A. J. Bridges Right of Way Eng~.neer AJB/mb cc: J. K. Timmons & Associates Consulting Engineer, 1314 W. Main Street, Richmond, Va. 23220 Rev: 1-21-71 Map Section oo 7-6 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA DRAINAGE EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this __Jlecember_, 19 71. ~, by and between.. T~E BAT.I~Bb*RY CORPO'~ATION ~ A_Vi~! n~a ~nr.nm~a~.nn day of and his, her, their or its heirs, successors and assigns, hereinafter referred to as "owner", party of the first part, and the COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter referred to as "County", party of the second part, WITNESSETH~ That for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1~00) and other good'and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the owner does hereby grant and convey unto the - County~ a perpetual easement and right of-way for the purpose of insta%l~ ing, constructing, maintaining, operating, repairing altering, replacing and removing a public drainage ditch and/or, culvert is) and other appurtenant facilities under, ~h~ugh~.,upmn~ over and across the pro- perty of the owner located in Mtdl~tht&~ District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, together with all th~"rig~ts'anh"'privileges hereinafter enumer= ated pertaining to said property, being more particularly bounded and described as follows: A permanent easement and right of way ?ixteem ~16'~ feet in width (and a permanent easement ..and..r'igh~.~o.f Way feet in width). ~as ahown .shaded in B~2kCK on a ~l~t mad& bye. ~ K.. T~m~ &~ ~. ~ , C. ona~lt~g Engin'~'e'r~s, Richm6nd, Virginia, revlSe~ , a copy of'~W~~~ is attacSed her'ei0' ~nd to~ Wh'i~h 'r'e'ference is made for a more detail- ed description of the said easement ....... Furthe= reference is made to th~ plans and .specifications of ~ Project No .... ,, ~da~t. ed ' ..... revised ., on file iTM 6he 6ffi~'e"0f t~n~~ County E~g'ineer, Che's'te'rf'i'e'id, V'~ gihia. This easement is granted subject to the following conditions~ l~ This ~easem~t is give~n for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of a public drainage ditch for the drainage of .surface and stoz~n waters, together wi th the right and privilege to install pipe, pipes~ culverts and drains, catch basins or manholes, and with the further right of ingress and egress thereto and therefrom to ~_inspect~ repair~ clean out and maintain and including the right to 'emove trees, ~ush~s, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the %oca'tion~ construction and maintenance of said ditch or other public drainage faciii~ay.~ 2o 'Ihat the County shall' have the right to trim, cut and remove all trees~ limbs, undergrow*th~ shrubbery, landscape plantings of any kind, fences, buildings, structures or other obstructions or facilities on or in said easement which it de~ms in any way to interfere with the proper and efficient construction, operation and maintenance of the utilities in said easement~ provided, however, that unless hereinafter otherwise agreed, except for trees, limbs, undergrowth, shrubbery and landscape plantings of any kind, the County shall repair, restore or replace any and all facilities located on or in the said easement which may be disturb~d, damag~.~d or r~moved to as nearly as possible their original conditions, and shall r~move all trash and other debris from the easement and shall restore the surface thereof to as nearly as possi- z-~le its original condition° 3o That the owner reserves the right to make use of the easement herein granted which may not be inconsistent with the rights herein conveyed, or interfere with the use of' the said· easement by the County for the purposes aforesaid~ provided, however, that unless hereinafter otherwise~ agreed the owner shall not erect any building or other structure, except- ing a fence~ on the smid easement without obtaining the prior written approval of the County~ 4, Tha~ d~ring p.~z~iods of actual construction, operation or maintenance actiVities ~ t'he said ~asement whenever it becomes necessary to use any land of the o~ner immediately adjoining and abutting said easement, the County shall have the right to make reasonable use thereof° .~.~· I't is agreed among the parties hereto that this grant covers all t~e ~g~,~.~_~ements '~etw~n the parties and no representation or~ statements, 'verbal. or written~ have been made, modifying, adding to, or changing the term~ ©f this ag~'~ment~ 6~ ~i~he owner co'w~z~ants that he, she or they has or have the right to convey the said easement~ that the Cour~ y shall have quiet and peaceful possession, use and enjo)nnent of the said easement; and that the owner will execute such .further assurances of the said easement as may be re~uisiteo IN WITNESS. ~WHEREOF.,~..the .owner has caused its name to be signed here- to by its 'President ., and its corporate seal to be hereto ann's'xed,' duly' a'tt'e'sted',' bY its Assistant Secretary , both of ~.~aid officers being duly authorized, in accordance iwith authority recorded n Deed Book 563 _~ Page 507 Clerk's Office Chesterfield County Circuit Court. ' ' TiE SA!,ISSURY CORPO~ATIOI~, By ~ [~W~~ Title /~/ P.reside.n. t ATTEST: Title: Assistant_~ecretary State of County/City of I, ,, to-wit: and for the of whose commission as such will expire on the ~,, a Notary Public in ,,,, State of Virginia day of 19 , do hereby certify that J.K. TIMMONS and J. J. JEWETT whose names as PRESIDENT and ASSISTANT SECRETAR~espectively of THE SALIFBURY C©RPO~L4TION., A Virginia are $i~ned to the foregoing and hereunto annexed agreeme~t~ bearing date of the 2nd day of December, 19 71 , have this day personally appeared before me, in my and State aforesaid, and acknowledged the same before me to be the act and deed of the said c.~orporat ion. Given under my hand this day of , 19 N0 t'a'ry Public ! I I f'-"X L._J 1.00' LOT 10 ,~ 16' EIISE~ENT TO .o fSE DEDIC/~TED BY -,, x THIS PL~T B?' L=i,:15.4B' N47"5B'OO"W 'DEDICRTION OF It~' ac,oss u~='., "ERSEffiENT P,C!~O~5 r.~ s~,,s~um, COnI=,OF~nTION DEED BOOK 500 P~GE ~ LOT 10, BLOCK 'W' OF I'"]". t,..o.s · ^ssoc,^~s '~LI~Ia, IIRY ~ECTlt3N '1 ;~,v,L ~.~,.,.~.~., ~..v~o.~ ~ Im~mmm- --- --,m,-,,m, ..... ; I 1314 W. MAIN ST. RICHMOND. VA. :. ~.. 1 ~. mlOLOTHIRN DISTRtCT I C"ESTERFt'ELD' C0" VIR6tNt:"/~ COLONEL E. P. GILL CHIEF OF POLICE E. T. SMITH CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES COUNTY OF CHESTERF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT November 22, 197l IELD Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Sir: I wish to recommend the following person to be appointed as a Police Officer for Chesterfield County: Ronald Eugene Puckett EPG/jc Respectful ly yours, Colonel E. P. Gill Chief fo Police COLONEL E. P, GILL E. T. SMITH CAPTAIN OF DETECTIVES COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT November 22, 1971 Mr. Melvin W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Sir: Ronald Eugene Puckett who I am recommending as a police officer has had three and half years as a police officer in Colonial Heights. He is 27 years old and has completed three years in the military service. Dur- ing his time with the military service, he was awarded the National Defense Service Metal, Good Conduct Metal, Viet Nam Service Metal and Viet Nam Compaign Metal. During the time he was a police officer he completed the Central Police School held at State Police Headquarters, two weeks training in general police work conducted by the Petersburg Police and the FBI, and also a class on Firearms conducted by the FBI in Hopewell. Mr. Puckett will fill a vacancy created by the retirement of Lt. R. E. Feeback on November 1, 1971. EPG/jc Respectful ly Submitted, Colonel E. P. Gill Chief of Police LXVESTOC~ AND POULTRY CLAXH INVESTIGATION REPORT DATE ~..~-,-e.,~,~ STO¢,~.~ , , .~d~e.~.,,~/~ % .... ........ " no. Description {kind, age, ~fch occu~ed on ~/-/~ 19~<in Chesterfield County. I estate value of $~ ~ each, total value $. / .... ~xo ............................ =la~d. ~ ~u~1~y (~. do~s) ~ ~av~ ~o~) b~. a.d ar~ d~s=r~b~d as follows: ..... ~ ~ ,,S~,= ~H~ Da~ge was done in the following ~nner: ~ ~ As a result of maiming, . of the total claimed above were destroyed by the owner, or by me at the owner's request. Following are witnesses: I have investigated this claim as thoroughly as possible. I (have, ~) viewed the remains of the animals claimed. I (have, viewed the area where said animals were attacked along with other physical evidence and I (have, ~-) questioned available witnesses. Respectfully, WHERE~S, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia having previously stated that the operations of the Chesterfield County Nursing Home shall be a self-supporting enterprise of the County and therefore now states that the $925,324.54 previously advanced by the General Fund of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia as of ~une 30, 1971 for the Nursing Home's construction and operation is to be included in the rate base of the Chesterfield County Nursing Home and is reimbursable to the General Fund of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia recognizes the necessity for providing for the replacement of the Chesterfield County Nursing Home's facilities on a perpetual funded basis. BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield establishes for the current budget year 1971-72 the Chesterfield County Nursing Rome Construction Fund, Fund 25, as follows= The purpose and function of this fund shall be to provide for the construction and replacement of the Chesterfield County Nursing Home facilities. The amount of $925,324.54 reimbursable to the General Fund of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia from the Chesterfield County Nursing Home is hereby assigned to this fund, effective ~uly 1, 1971, The Chesterfield County Nursing Home Fund shall pay the $925,324.54 to this fund over a thirty-eight (38) year term at the rate of 5% interest per annum with $26,866.89 payable December 31,1971, plus accrued interest of $23,133.11 and with the balance to be paid in thirty-eight (38) annual installments including interest each J~ne 30, beginning ~une 30, 1972, The cost of replacements and/or capital outlays made by this fund for the Chesterfield County Nursing Home shall be repaid to this fund on an annual basis by the Chesterfield County Nursing Home over a term based on the estimated service life of the replacements and/or capital outlays in annual installments with principal and interest at a rate of 5% interest per annum, with repayment to begin JUne 30 of the fiscal year in which the replacement and/or the capital outlays are placed into service. Service available in 46 states including Hawaii; and in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Canada. I~u~yers 'Iitle Insurance Home Office - Richmond .Virginia National Division, Branch and Agency offices and Approved Attorneys located throughout the operating territory as shown on the map. ~oration FOrt° © © A word of thanks to our insured ..... As we make your policy a part of our permanent records, we want to express our appreciation of this evidence of your faith in Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation. There is no recurring premium. This policy provides valuable title protection and we'suggest you keep it in a safe place where it will be readily available for future reference. ] wyers qitle Insurance rporation CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS--CONTINUED 7. Limitation of Liability No claim shaft arise or be maintainable under this policy (a) if the Company, after having received notice of an alleged defect, lien or encumbrance insured against hereunder, by litigation or otherwise, removes such defect, lien or en- cumbrance or establishes the title, as insured, within a reasonable time after receipt of such notice; (b) in the event of litigation until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as insured, as provided Jn paragraph 3 hereof; or (c) for liability voluntarily assumed by an insured in settling any claim or suit without prior written consent of the Company. 8. Reduction of Liability All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro tanto. No payment shall be made without producing this policy 'For endorsement of such payment unless the policy be lost or destroyed, Jn which case proof of sucl~ loss or de- struction shah be furnished to the satisfaction of the Cam pany. 9. Liability Noncumulative It is expressly understood that the amount of insurance under this policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay under any policy insuring either (a} a mortgage shown or referred to in Schedule B hereof which is a llen on the estate or interest covered by this policy, or (b) a' mortgage hereafter executed by an insured which is a charge or lien on the estate or interest describec~ or referred to in Schedule A, and the amount so paid shall be deemect a payment under this policy. The Company shall have the option to apply to the payment of any such mortgages any amount that otherwise would be payable hereunder to the insured owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this po[icy to said insured owner. 10. Apportionment ~f the land described in Schedule A consists of two or more parcels which are not used as a single site, and a loss is established affecting one or more of said parcels but not all, the loss shall be computed and settled on a pro rata basis as if the amount of insurance under this policy was divided pro rate as to the value on Date of Policy of each separate parcel to the whole, exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to Date of Policy, unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upoh as to each such parcel by the Company and the insured at the time of the issuance of this policy and shown by an express statement herein or by an endorsement attached hereto. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement Whenever the Company shall have settled a claim under ;~hls policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the insured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which such insured claimant would have had against any person or property in respect to such claim had this policy not been issued, and Jf requested by the Company, such insured claimant shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect such right of subrogation and shall permit the Company to use the name of such insured claimant in any transaction or litigation involving such rights or remedies. If the payment does not cover the loss of such insured claimant, the Company shall be subrogated to such rights and remedies in the proportion which said payment bears to the amount of sald loss. If loss should result from any act of such insured claimant, such act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, shall be required to pay only that part of any losses insured against here- under which shall exceed the amount, if any, lost to the Company by reason of the impairment of the right of subrogation. 12. Liability Limited to this Policy This instrument together with all endorsements and other instruments, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the insured and the Company. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and condi- tions and stipulations of this policy. No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be made except by writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant ,Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 13. Natices, Where Sent Al~ notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to its Home Office. 3800 Cutshaw Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 23230. ]9_.uJyers lille Insurance ( rporation A Stock Company Home Office ~ l~ichmond .Virginia Policy 85--Litho in U.S.A. American Land Title Association Owner's Policy--Form B--1970 Copyright 1969 AMOUNT $ 104,799.50 19_p ers ']]tle Insurance ( rporation A Stock Company Home Office ~, R~chmond .Vir~;inia POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A NAME OF INSURED CASE NO. 274921 DATE OF POLICY December 22, 1971 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA 1. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: Fee Simple 2. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: County of Chesterfield, Virginia 3. The la nd referred to in this Policy is described as ALL that certain tract or less, lying and being an County, Virginia, about one Chesterfield Courthouse, tract of land (surveyed out 156.8 Can Company, Inc. by deed 30, 1953, recorded in the Clerk' field County, Virginia, in Deed Be containing 91.13 acres, more Lal District, Chesterfield northeasterly direction from g portion of a 160-acre conveyed to the Continental and wife, dated November of the Circuit Court of Chester- 432, page 379, a 65.67-acre tract having been conveyed off the original tract by Continental Can Company, Inc., to the County School Board of Chesterfield County, Virginia, by deed dated November 18, 1968, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 945, page A29. BEING the same real estate conveyed to County of Chesterfield, Virginia, by Deed from Continental Can Company, Inc., dated November 30, 1971, recorded December 22, 1971, in Deed Book 1032, page 746, Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of ~esterfield County, Virginia. Issued at: RICHMOND, VIRGINIA ORIGINAL Page 1--Sched. A--Policy No. R 4 0 0 3 i American Land Title Association Owner's Pollcy--Form B 1970 Copyright 1969 SCHEDULE B This Policy does not insure against loss or damage by reaso, of the following: 2. Taxes s~secuent to t., s,~ f,.~r the year 1971. 3. Rights of parties in ~ s~;es:;ion. Encroachment~s, overla';~ , de line dispute s, roadwai~f , un: record whicl would be i:;cl~,sed of the premises. : quantity of ground, boundary ements, or any matters not of an accurate survey and inspection Possible unfiled mecha~.ics' and EASEMENT: To Virginia Elect 1949, recorded in Che:'; =~]'fi~:ld C page 369. Crants pol~ l:ne ea of owners. ~lmen's liens· Company, dated August 24, ~znma, in Deed Book 342, over, upon and across property In the deed from Cont_<~ ~Lta.5 Can Co, any, a iTew York corporation, to the County School Boa)~ (~f (hesterfield Cotu~ty, Virginia, the grantor, Continental Can Compa]~ ,In¢., reserves unto itself, its successors and assigns, an easem~ t fiJty (50) feet in width along the northern line of the .~ereindes~, ii. ed property, as shown on the attached plat, for the purpose of int-~s znd egress to the remaining lands of said grantor; which easeme~ ~ £ha3l continue until such time as the remaining lands of the grantor ~,~i a].l lave frontage on a public road, constructed, completed, and maintai~ad with hard surface which is a part of the county highway system. £po~~ the availability, as herein set forth, of a public road front. ~E t¢ the remainder of the grantor's lands, the said 50-foot easement ~ %~11 expire. At the option of the grantee, or its assigns, the said · )-foot easement may be-dedicated to a public road right o~ way conc~ c~en~ with construction of an improved and hard surface road ther~ )r~. Rights of up.)er and lc~ ~z rioarian owners in and to the waters of Proctor's Cr~ek and tk~ ~atural flow thereof and title to that por- tion of the insured pre ~ertp that may be embraced within the portion of said cree3~ where it ~cnstitutes the southern property line. CONT[NUED Policy 85--Litho in U.S.A. Page I of Sched. B--Policy No. R 4 0 0 3 t ORIGINAL American Land Title Association Owner's Policy--Form S--1970 Copyright 1969 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA June 17~ 1971 A.L.Wenrich ~ontinental Woodlands 340 Hopewell! Virginia 23860 Dear ~r. Wep~tch~ This will confirm our conversation 'of this date in which I gave you the County's offer of $ 10.0.00 per acre for the 95-acres, more or less, in the Vicinity of Chesterfield Courthouse. I believe you referS, ed to %his as the Tucker tract. This amount is more than the appraisal price submitted by our Appraisert Mr.%~,.B.F. Johnson~ who knows the '~nd values and transfers in this area~ howevert in li~3ht of a recent sale in this area~ a sale whTch was predicated on multi-family zoningt the County Boar~ felt that a higher price would be offered. %{~e do hope that we are successful in purchasing this tract. This w~ll be a cash transaction. Should t~ere be any questions concerning any phase of this offer, please let me know. We do~appreclate your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours M~ W. Burnett Executive Secretary 1~I3NTI NENTAL Wr'll3D LANDS DIVISION OF CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, INC. P. O. BOX 340 - HOPEWELL. VA. August 27, 1971 Nr. Eugene R. Marable, Jr. Marable & Jones Post Office Box 107 Petersburg, ¥trgtnla 23803 Proposed Sale - County of C~esterfteld ~9288 Roy £. Tucker Tract - 91.13 Acres Chesterfield Count~, ¥trgtnta ~ear Mr. ~arable: ge have agreed to sell to the Coun~ of Chesterfield approxtmtely 91.13 acres of the ~ove property. Thts betng the raa~tnder of me 156.80 acre tract we purchased from Roy £. Tucker and wife by deed dated November 30, 1953, and recorded tn the Clerk's Office of the County of Chesterfield tn Deed Book 432, Page 379. A portion of this tract was conveyed to the County School Board of Chesterfield tn 1968 and Is recorded tn Deed Book 945, page 4Z9. Please prepare the spectat warranty deed conveying this property to the Cbunty of Chesterfield. Price ts to be $1,150.00 per acre. ge wtll reserve the rtght to cut and remove the timber from th~s property within t~o years from the date of the deed. Should you have aw questions concertng the preparation of t. he deed, please contact Hr. N. W. Surr~tt, Executive Sec~te~ of ~e County of Cheste~teld, Ches~rfteld, Virginia. Yours var~ truly, CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY, INC. A. L. Wenrtch Otstrlct Manager of Land & Tt;ber cc: Mr. M. W. aurnett P~EAL ESTATE SALES ~ APPRAISALS ~ CONSULTANT W. B. F. dohnson Realtor (SINCE 1932) 915 HULL STREET RiCHmOND. VirgiNia 23224 DiAl 232-1269 June 8, 1971 Mr. Melvin W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Dear Mel: While you were on vacation your assistant, John Longmire, ask me to appraise a tract of land in the rear of Salem Elementary School. The original tract containing 160 acres by Deed Book ~32, Page 379, deed also showed a VEPCO easement. On February 16, 1969, the County of Chesterfield purchased from Continental Can Company 65.67 acres by survey. The residue consisting of 94J3 acres. The actual acreage of this residue by survey is not available to me, although the Conti~ntal Can Company probably has the plat. When the County purchased the 65.67 acres, Continental Can Company reserved a 50 feet right of way on the Northern line, approximately 3,000 feet in length. This right of way is particularly level, so building a road should not be too difficult. The map that I was given, ~howing Parcel No. 96-1, Section 96, showed a 94.33 acre tract, approximately 300 feet North of Proctors Creek for about two-thirds the length of the South line and a portion of the land on the Southside of said creek, approximately 300 feet. On inspection of this property I followed the entirer exterior line, painted white, and it showed the line to Proctors Creek and several places adjoining the county sewer line, evidently the North line of the creek is a property line. All of the land is wooded with some small oak, patches of small pine, and scattered large pine. Most of the land is fairly high, sloping to Proctors Creek. There are a few marshy places, one on the North Mr. Melvin W. Burnett Page 2 June 8, 1971 line, some near the creek. There is an old road on the West line where there are corner iron pins. Sewer is available to this property and 12 inch water line approximately 1,200 feet away on the school property. Generally the property is in a good location with new homes being increasingly built near it. In estimating the value of this property, I did not consider the value of the pine trees. Considering the location, comparative sales in the general area, and inflation of land values, I consider a fair value of this property as of this date to be $1,050 per acre or $q9~000. Yours truly, WBFJ/cap · F. J~nson DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G. L. BAUGHAN, LURAY, VA. MORRILL M. CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOLK, VA, LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. RUFUS T. HAIRSTON, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. ON'".ON rEALTt-f DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 November 17, '1971 JOHN E. HARWOOD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J. V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS H. GORDON BLUNDON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING Addition and Abandonment Secondary System - Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board on October 27, 1971, the following addition to and abandonment from the Secondary System of Chesterfield County are hereby approved, effective November 17, 1971. ADDITION LENGTH From Route 687 to Route 650, Project 0687-020-153,C501. 0.62 Mi. ABANDONMENT Route 687, from Route 60 to 0.18 mi. southward and eastward, Project 0687-020-153,C501. 0.18 Mi. Copies: Mr. A. S. Mattox Mr. P. B. Coldiron Mr. C. A. Palmer Mr. L. R. Treat, Jr. Mr. L. H. Dawson, Jr. Mr. W. R. Davidson - Chesterfield Sincerely~ E.Harwood, Deputy~ommissioner A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT DOUGLAS B. FUGATE, COMMISSIONER G. L BAUGHAN, LURAY, VA. MORRILL M, CROWE, RICHMOND, VA. W. FRED DUCKWORTH, NORFOLK, VA. LE ROY EAKIN, JR., McLEAN, VA. EARL A. FITZPATRICK, ROANOKE, VA. THOMAS R. GLASS, LYNCHBURG, VA. RUFUS T. HAIRSTON, BRISTOL, VA. DOUGLAS G. JANNEY, FREDERICKSBURG, VA. '"IONWEALT FF 0j~,. . OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA. 23219 December 1, 1971 JOHN E. HARWOOD, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION A. K. HUNSBERGER, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING J, V. CLARKE, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS H. GORDON BLUNDON, DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING Secondary System Additions - Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Gentlemen: As requested in resolution by your Board on June 23, 1971, the following additions to the Secondary System of Chesterfield County are hereby approved, effective December 1, 1971. A.DD ITIONS LENGTH GAY FARMS SUBDIVISIONa SECTION 4 Merry Drive - From the southern end of maintenance of Route 1573 southwardly 0.03 mile to Jolly Lane. 0.03 Mi. Jolly Lane - From its intersection with Merry Drive westwardly 0.04 mile to a cul-de-sac and from the same intersection with Merry Drive eastwardly 0.09 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.13 Mi. Placid Avenue - From Blithe Road (Route 1562) southwardly 0.09 mile to a cul-de-sac. 0.09 Mi. Sincerely, Copies: Mr. A. S. Mattox Mr. P. B. Coldiron Mr. C. A. Palmer Mr. L. R. Treat~ Jr. Mr. L. H. Dawson, Jr. Mr. E. L. Covington, Jr. - Chesterfield A HIGHWAY IS AS SAFE AS THE USER MAKES IT Commis s loner z606 ~uvo~D ~OAD · v.O. nOX 3068 · ~()~ Am, Wnt;~A Z3235 R~l~;or$ TELEPIIONE: z72-~47~ November 30~ 1971 [J~r. W. W. Burnette, Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield~ Va. 23S32 Dear I4r. Burnette: Pursuant to a meeting today with the State ttigh- may Department and a representative of the Chesterfield County ~ngineering Deoartment~ we are requesting a reso- lution by the County accepting the roads in Section "C'i of Stonehenge Subdivision. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Si6~srely, kobert C. Cornell, Agen~ for Eonarco Corporation. RCC/kt COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD. VIRGINIA ~I]~'m~R~N~ AHD UT~XT~LS DI~'ARTMEHT XX. XXX · IV. Approval si water contrf~:t: ~71o60D Physic Hill, ~m~tion D $2,759.00 AMard of Se~er Concrect 6511-9B1, Ash~on Creek Sub*~. (See bid sheet from Fred W. Barnes Construction Company, Inc,) Certi£icacee for Ashr~n Creek nd ~aCoeca La, eons issued by ~Be SCats Water Control Board, Approval of Chenge Order Ho. i for l~oJoct 65~1-33B, Poeoohe~ Creek. Approval o~ sewer ~~$: $71-35D ~ocoI -Rouce 10 $71-36CD East Side of Kr~use Road vi. (b) proper~y in the sourest quadrant of Route 10 and Route 1 by Mr. Couch. VII. Roquemt of sewer service for Econo-Travel Hotor-Hotel, X-95 V and Willis Road, to Bellwood ~inor Lagoon. Ill. Conoideratiou o£ water and saver easement a~r~t for Project 1/70-36CD/12, Boule 60, scroll ~he proper~y of Rolsnd--R Nawcomb end ~ie T. ~eomb, his wt~e. Construction Company, Immrporeted. X. Consideration of street name change f~un Fatrfex Avenue Co Xl. Policy for sale of County naps. Robert A. Fainter County Enstneer December 8, 1971 STATUS OF ASHTON CREEK LAGOON December 8, 1971 Design Capacity - 4000 People Existing Connections Committed Equivalent People 1. Lake Tree Apts. - 40 Units (paid) 120 2. Greenleigh Trailer Park - 64 Trailers (Paid) 192 3. School - South Chester Rd. - 600 Pupils 120 4. Thomas - 120 Unit Motel, 96 Seat Rest., 3~ acres Committed 230 5. Alexander Motors - (Paid) 4 6. Benton - Hyde Park - 400 Units 1,200 Building Permits Issued 7. Holiday Inn Addition - 68 Units 8. Resturant (Carry Out) across from Tyler 68 2O ,~,ewers Extended~ Development not Complete e 10o 11. Hidden Valley - 158-+ Lots 632 Greenlei~h - 200 Trailers 600 Gay Farms - 13 Lots with sewer connections installed 52 TOTAL 4,439 ,Other Requests 13. 14. 17. Evans Property- 15A Commercial 18A R-1 Couch-Martin - 600-900 Apts. 22 Acre Commercial American Oil Station Formerly American Oil property - 48 Unit Motel now 50 Unit addition Sunoco Station - Commercial Homestead Motel - 12 Motel Units) 2 Trailers ) Existing Longest - ~3acenr :o ~yae Park - 15 Acres 46O 1,800 - 2,700 440 12 120 21 540 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Goyne Chevrolet Pillow Mobile Home - 50 Trailers Laketree - Remainder of Subdivision - Old Chester Dump Area Petersburg Mutual Gay Farms Addition TOTAL 20 ~0 ? ? 8 ? 3,591 2 ENGINEERLNG DEPARTHE~ COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD STREET NAME RECOMMENDATION TO: BOARD OF sUPERViSORS It is recommended that the street shown on the attached plat named Fairfax Avenue be renamed Hyde Park Drive. Date Recommended By Engineer lng Department Approved By' o $ ~ACREAGE O CHESTER- P.B.I~Pg.3II;EB.~ Pg:50~*EB.5,Pg. 16;D.B.41 Pg.69~ SOUTH CHESTER EB 5 F~. I10 ~ IIIGB'I3$'Pg 14~;0.~.188 F~g:533 ' 8 9 ~o 8 9 6 1 ~o THE Publisher of RICHMOND TIMES-DESPATCH newspaper My cemmissi<m expires SPENCER TITLE This i~ I[o cemify that the arts was published in The l{ichamnd published in the City of Richmond 0 0 O0 0 Policy 85--Litho in U.S.A. American Land Title Association Owner's Policy--Form B--1970 Copyright 1969 I9 u ,ers tle A Stock Company ( rporalion SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM ~NS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND .AWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as te of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount A, and costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest d~scribed in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title; 3. Lack. of a right of access ~o and from the land 4. Unmarketability of such title. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Company has caused this Policy to be signed and sealed, to be va!id when SChedule A is Countersigned by a~ authorized officer ar agent of the. Company, all in accordance with its By:Laws. l u /)s tle Insurance Cor .p_?ratton Attest': / ~ ~// Secr. etary. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordi- nances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the ~and, or pro- hibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights .of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears Jn the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured Claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claim- ant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. &merican Land Title Association Owner;s Policy--Form G--1970 Copyright 1~69 Parley 85 Litho in U.S.A. · L u ers tle Insurance ( rporalion A' Stock Company Home Office ~ Richmond .Virginia CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "insured": the insured named in Schedule A,. and, subj. ect to any rights or defenses the Company may have had against the named insureci, those who succeed to the interest of ~ch I~sured by ope'ration of law as distinguished from purchase Jndudlng, but not limited to, heirs, distribut~es, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, next of kin, or corporate or fiduciary successors. (b) "insured claimant": c~n insured dairying 1ass or damage hereunder. (c) "knowledge": o.ctual' knowledge,-.not constructive knowledge or notice which may be imputed to afl in~ured by reason of any public records. Id) "land": the land described, specifically or by reference' in Schedule A, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property; pro- vided, however, the te.rm "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area specifically described or referred to Jn Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abuttTng streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways,.but nothing herein, sba. II modify or limit th.e extent to which a right of access 'to and from the land is insured by this policy. (e) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (f) "public records": those records which by law impart constructive notice of matters relating to said la'nd. 2. Continuation of In.sura.nce after Conveyance of Title The coverage of this policy shaft continue in farce as of'Date of Policy in f~or of an insured so long as such insured retains an estate or interest in the land, or holds an indebtedness secured by a purchase money.mortgage given by a purchaser from such insured, or so long as such insured shall have liability by reason of convenants of warranty made by such insured in any transfer or con- veyance of such .estate or interest; provided, however, this policy shal~ not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from such insured of either said estate or interest or the indebte;dness ~ecured by a purchase money mortgage given to such insured. 3. Defense and Prosecution of Actions--Notice of Claim to be given by an Insured Claimant (a) The Company, at its own cost and without undue delay, shall provide for the defen~,e of an insured in a~l litigation co~.nsist~ng of actions or proceedings commenced against sucJ~ insured to the extent that such litigation is founded upon an alleged defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy. (b) The insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case any action or proceeding is begun as set forth in (a) above, (ii) in case know~edge shall come to an insured hereunder of any claim of tit~e or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest as insured, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be fiable by virtue of this poficy. If such prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then as to such insured all liabi~ity of the Company shall cease and terminate in regard to the matter or matters for which such prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify shall in no case prejudice the rights of any such insured under this policy unless the Company shal~ be prejudiced by such failure and then only to the extent of such prejudice. (c) The Company shall have the right at its o~vn cost to institute and without undue delay prosecute any action or proceeding or to do a~_y other a~:t which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest 'as insured, and the Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of thi~ policy, whethe[ or n~t it shall be liable there~under, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provisio~ of this policy. (d) Whenever the Company shal~ have brought any action or interposed a defense as required or permitted by the provisions of this policy, the Company may pursue any such litigation ~to final determination by a court of competent jurlsd~ction an~d expressly reserves the right, in its sol~ discretion, to appeal from any adverse judgment or order. (e) In all cases ~vhere this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for'the defense of any action or proceeding, th~ insured hereunder shall secure to the Company the right- to so prosecute or provide defense in such action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company' to use, o,t its option, the name of such insured for such purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, such insured shall give the Company all reasonab~ alcLin any such actlon'or proceeding, in affecting settlement, securing evlde~ce~ obtaining witnesses, or prosecuting or defending such action or proceeding, and the Company shall reimburse such insured for any expense ~o incurred. 4. Notice of Loss--Limitation of Action in addition to the notices required under paragraph 3(b) of these Conditions and Stipulations, a stafemen? in writing of any loss or damage for which it is claimed the Company is liable under this policy shall be furnished to the Com- pany within 90 days after such loss or damage shall have been determined and no right of actio~ shall accrue to an insured claimant until 30 days after such stcl~ement shall have been furnished. Failure to furnish such statement of loss or damage sba II terminate any Jiabillty of the Company under this policy as ta such loss or damage. 5, Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims The Company shall have the option to pay. or otherwise settle for or in the name of c n insured claimant any claim insured &galnst or to terminate all liability and obligations of the Company hereunder by paying or tendering payment of the ~'mount of insurance ~nder this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred up to the time of such payment or tender of payment, by the insured claimant and authorized by the Company. 6. Determination and Payment of Loss (a) The liability of the Company under this policy shall in no case exceed the least of: (i) the actual loss of the insured claimant; or (ii) the amount of insure nce stated in Schedule A; or (ill) the actual value of the estate or interest of the insured claimant in the land described in Schedule A at the time the loss or damage insured against hereunder occurs undiminished by the defect, llen, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy. (b) The Company will pay, in addltion to any loss insured against by this policy, all costs imposed upon an insured Jn litigation carried on by the Company for such insured, and all costs, attorneys' fees and expenses, in lltigatlon carded on by such insured with the written authorization of the Company. (c) When liability has been definitely fixed in accordance with the conditions of this policy, the loss or damage shall be payable within 30 days thereafter. Continued on cover sheet ]]tle Insurance ( rporation A Stock Company Home Off'icc ~ Richmond .Virginia SCHEDULE ~ cont'd. Reservation of all timber of any size and description on the insured property for a period of 2 years with full rights to enter upon said property and do all things necessary for the purpose of cutting and removing the timber therefrom, as contained in the deed from Conti- nental Can Company, Inc. t of Chesterfield, Virginia, dated November 30, 1971 and re 's Office, Circuit Court, Chesterfield County, Virg ~nla, Book 1032, page 746. Page 2 of Sched.__~Bpol. No. R 40031 Litho in U.$,,A. ORIGINAL Form 9't-98 (For Policy 84 or 85) ENDORSEMENT [a_.myers tle Insurance rporation A Stock Company Home Office - Richmond .Virginia Attached to and made a part of Lawyers Title Insurance CorporatiOn Policy No. R 40031 (Case No. 274921) The Conditions and Stipulation are hereby amended to delete therefrom sub-paragraph (a) its entirety and %o substitute therefor the following: (a) The liability of ceed the least of: his policy shall in no case ex- (i) the actual loss o imant; or (ii) the amount of insurance statedin Schedule A. The total liability of the Company under said policy and under this and any prior endorsements thereto shall not exceed, in the aggregate, the amount of liability stated on the face of said policy, as the same may be spe- cifically amended in dollar amount by this or any prior endorsements, and the costs which the Company is ob- ligated under the Conditions and Stipulations thereof to pay. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending or changing the effective date of said policy, unless otherwise expressly stated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Endorsement to be signed and sealed as of the date of said policy, to be valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accord- ance with its By-Laws. lille Insurance Orporation Countersigned by: .~~ '~. ~ RICHMOND BRANCH OFFICE ~c~u. h~}trized Officer or Agent Secretary. l~myers Vl~l~l Nov~mbe~ 18, 1971 MACK T. DANIELS LEE R. GORDON COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY CIRCUIT COURT CHESTERFIELD, VIrgINIA November 11, 1971 ERNEST P, GATES JUDGE DAVID MEADE WHITE JUDGE Mr. M. W. Burnett Executive Secretary County of Chesterfield Chesterfield, Virginia Re: Vacation of drainage and utility easement on Lot 15, Avon Estates Subdivision Dear Mel: There will be found attached petition of Betty C. Stafford, copy of legal notice and proposed ordinances with plat showing easement to be vacated. Please file these papers and hold them in your office for inspection by any parties who may be interested pursuant to the notice. Also, please schedule this matter for public hearing at the Board's regular meeting on December 8, 1971, pursuant to the notice. Very truly yours, Morris E. Mason Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney bhg cc: Betty C. Stafford To: PETITION } The Board of Supervisors Chesterfield County, Virginia Re: Vacation of a 16 Foot Drainage and Utility Easement Across Lot 15 in Avon Estate Subdivision Your petitioner, Betty C. Stafford, respectfully represents: 1. Thai she is the record owner of that certain parcel of land shown on the subdivision plat of Avon Estates recorded in Plat Book 9, page 7, Chesterfield County, in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court, Virginia, and designated as Lot 15, across which there has been dedicated to the County of Chesterfield a 16-foot drainage and utility easement. This drainage and utility easement is more particularly described and shown on a plat made by LaPrade Bros., Civil Engineers and Surveyors, Richmond, Virginia, dated June 28, 1971, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. 2. That your petitioner desires to have the said drainage and utility easement vacated in order that the petitioner's Lot 15 may be made an integral unencumbered part of the land owned by petitioner which is situated on the western boundary line of Lot 15 as shown on the aforesaid plat designated as 0.08 acres. WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays that the Board of Supervisors will consider the Ordinance attached hereto for adoption in order that the aforesaid drainage and utility easement be abandoned and vacated in accord- ance with Section 15. 1-482, Morris E. Mason P. O. Box 25 Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Respectfully, B~[FTY C. STAFFORD Of Counsel TAKE NOTICE ~that once 8th ,day of December, 1971, at 9:00 A. M., or as soon thereafter aS may be heard, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Chesterfield, Virginia, at its regular meeting place in the Board l~oom of the County Comet House at Chesterfield, Virginia, will con- sider the following Ordinance for adoption: AN ORDII~ANCE to vacate a sixteen (16) foot drainage and utility easement in the subdivision of Avon Estates, I~ot 15, plat of which made by Philip H. Brooks, Certified Land Surveyor° l~ichmond, Virginia, dated November 2?, 1950, recorded in Plat Book 9, page 7, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of (~hesterfield Co,.tnty, Virginia, said easement being more particularly shown on a plat made by h~Prade Bros., Civil Engineers and Surveyors, dated June 28, 1971, andopy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The complete text of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Office of the Executive Secretary of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, Virginia, and may be examined by all interested parties between the hours of 9:00 A. M. and 5:00 P. M., Monday through Fridays. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IRVING. HORNER, C~AI~RMAN CLOVER H~LL DISTRICT C. J. PURDY BERMUDA DISTRICT 1. RUFFIN APPERSON DALE DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS F, F. DIETSCH MANCHESTER DISTRICT HERBERT O. BROWNING MATOACA DISTRICT ANDREW R. MARTIN MIDLOTNIAN DISTRICT COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD CHESTERFIELD, M. W. BURNETT EXECUTIVE SECRETARY VIRGINIA November 29, 19 71 Mr. M.W. Burnett, Executive Secretary Chesterfield Courthouse Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Dear Mr. Burnett, I am writing to see if there is anything I can do to bring the salaries up for the followin~ people in our department: David E. Barfield, Fire Marshal Fred W. Dolezal, Training Officer Edward B. Robertson, Fire Inspector $8976.00 $8544.00 $6720.00 These men put in untold hours for the Fire Department. I think their knowledge, ability, and dedication, along with their ability to work successfully in a combination system such as we have and ~ill for many years to come speaks for itself. Just for a comparison, a Richmond Fire Fighter of only 18 months makes $8606.00. Our County Training Officer's present salary is $8544.00. From this, I think you see something is needed to bring these salaries more in line. As you know, these employees cannot work a part-time job due to their County job and the amount of overtime they work. Thank you for your time and monsideration in this matter. Respectfully, Robert L. Eanes Chief of Department CHESTERFIELD FIRE DEPARTHENT RLE: j rb · 8, I$ 2'1 r~ ?t-4~ 71- ~ Rol~,d Wafer ~~w. easemenf on R-~.go, 't'r,.I land 7/-7--// 71T/~ ! J ,1, ,'g/&