Loading...
14SN0542CASE MANAGER: Robert Clay -R@tF.LlJ `-~ ~r ~~.~ cj~, u~ k f~ ~ tLkGl^~1~ BS Time Remaining: 365 days STAFF' S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 14SN0542 W.S. Carnes, Inc. Dale Magisterial District North line of Iron Bridge Road r„ ,,,~. ~~ ~ni n r~r Febn~ary 26, 2014 BS REQUEST: Rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (C-3). PROPOSED LAND USE: Commercial uses are planned. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROFFERED CONDITIONS ON PAGE 2. AYES: MESSRS. WALLIN, PATTON, BROWN AND WALLER. ABSENT: MR. GULLEY. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval for the following reasons: A. While the Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Corporate Office use, given the development constraints relative to the individual parcel size and configuration, and proxinuty to property currently zoned for commercial use, it is unlikely that separate office developments would occur on these request properties. As such, assemblage with the centrally located commercial tract under one cohesive development schematic would be appropriate. B. The proposed zoning and land uses, as linuted by proffered conditions, are representative of and compatible with existing and anticipated area development. (NOTE: THE ONLY CONDITION THAT MAY BE IMPOSED IS A BUFFER CONDITION. THE PROPERTY OWNER(S) MAY PROFFER OTHER CONDITIONS. CONDITIONS Pro~Tiding a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public ser~Tice NOTED "STAFF/CPC" WERE AGREED UPON BY BOTH STAFF AND THE COMMISSION.) PROFFERED CONDITIONS The property owner and applicant in this case, pursuant to Section 15.2-2298 of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for themselves and their successors and assigns, proffer that the property under consideration will be developed according to the following proffers if, and only if, the request submitted herewith is granted with only those conditions agreed to by the owner and applicant. In the event this request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the owner and applicant, the proffers shall immediately be null and void and of no further force or effect. (STAFF/CPC) 1. Utilities. The public water and wastewater systems shall be used. (U) (STAFF/CPC) 2. Prohibited Uses. The following uses shall not be pernutted on the Property: a. Gasoline Sales b. Automobile self-service station c. Motor vehicle washes d. Automobile service station e. Motor vehicle repair £ Motor vehicle sales and rental. (P) GENERAL INFORMATION Location: The request property is located along the north line of Iron Bridge Road, west of Lori Road. Tax IDs 769-662-7458 and 770-662-1615, 3320 and 3511. Existing Zoriin A Size: 2 2 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant 2 14SN0 X42-2014FEB2Ei-B( )S-RPT Adj acent Zoning and Land Use: North and East - A and G5; Single-family residential, office or commercial South - C-2, C-3, R-7 and A; Commercial, single- and two-fanuly residential or vacant West - C-3 and G5; Commercial UTILITIES Public Water Svstem: There is a sixteen (16) inch water line located along the north side of Iron Bridge Road. The use of the public water system is recommended and has been proffered by the applicant (Proffered Condition 1). Some of the C-3 uses will require the installation of a baclcflow prevention device on the water service line which must be tested annually. Public Wastewater Svstem: There is a ten (10) inch wastewater line located within the adjacent Court Square Office Park, approximately 610 feet from Tax ID 769-662-7458 and approximately 350 feet from Tax ID 770-662-3320. The use of the public wastewater system is recommended and has been proffered by the applicant (Proffered Condition 1). Due to the depth of the wastewater line and the existing topography of the site, grading may be necessary to insure that sufficient cover is provided over on-site lines. This will need to be determined during preliminary site design. Some of the C-3 uses will require the installation of a monitoring manhole to observe, measure, and sample the waste that is being discharged exclusively from a given site. ENVIRONMENTAL Drainage and Erosion: The property is exceptionally flat and the most workable direction to take the drainage would be towards Route 10. This would put the project in the Lower Swift Creek Watershed, as storm drainage facilities in Route 10 have outfalls to drainage systems that eventually reach Swift Creek. On the downstream side of Route 10, there is a fairly large wet pond Best Management Practice (BMP), which was installed with the development of the Chesterfield Commons shopping center. This Storm Water Management/Best Management Practice (SWM/BMP) appears to be strategically located so that offsite easements conveying the water from this project through Route 10 could then convey the drainage to this BMP. The BMP would need to be studied for its existing capabilities to provide for stormwater management for the existing development it serves and a determination made to see if an enlargement of this facility could accommodate development of this project. A retrofit of this SWM/BMP makes the most sense, unless limited capacity of facilities in Route 10 mandate on-site detention which would be very difficult in view of the extreme flatness of the land. 3 14SN0~42-2014FEB2Ei-BC)S-RPT Standard development regulations will be sufficient to obtain a project stormwater management design which will not be a detriment to the surrounding community. PUBLIC FACILITIES Fire Service: The Airport Fire Station, Company Number 15, currently provides fire protection and emergency medical service (EMS). This request will have a minimal impact on Fire and EMS. County Department of Transportation: This request will not linut development to a specific land use; therefore, it is difficult to anticipate traffic generation. Based on shopping center trip rates, development of the property could generate approximately 2,500 average daily trips (ADT). The applicant has indicated the property will be developed in conjunction with the adjacent General Business (GS) zoned property. This traffic will be distributed to Route 10, which had 2012 traffic counts of 25,955 vehicles per day. In 2012, this section of Route 10 from Frith Lane to Greenyard Road was improved to the ultimate six (6) lane section. At time of site plan, access easements may be required to serve adjacent properties. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT): No comments received, to date. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property is appropriate for Corporate Office use. Typical uses would include corporate headquarters, lawyer, accountant and real estate offices; or medical laboratories. Under certain circumstances, within larger tracts developed for office uses, integrated supporting retail and service uses would be appropriate. The Plan also locates the request properties within the Historic Courthouse Design Area. Within this area nonresidential development should be visually compatible with, and appropriately reflect the historic significance of the courthouse area. Area Development Trends: The area is characterized by a mix of office, commercial and public/senu-public (Chesterfield County Government Center) uses and by vacant, agricultLirally-zoned property, along this portion of the Iron Bridge Road Corridor. Courthouse Commons West 4 14SN0~42-2014FEB2Ei-BC)S-RPT Shopping Center is located across Iron Bridge Road to the south. It is anticipated that office and commercial uses would continue along this corridor, as suggested by the Plan. Development Standards: The request property lies within an Emerging Growth Area. New constriction must conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance which address access, parking, landscaping, architectural treatment, setbacks, signs, buffers, utilities, and screening of dumpsters and loading areas. The properties are also located within the Courthouse Area Design District which recognizes specified areas of the County as unique. The purpose of the Courthouse Area Design District is to provide standards that will encourage and enhance Colonial and Federalist architectural featires that are compatible with the historic strictures within, and in proximity tq the Chesterfield County Courthouse Complex. Architectural Treatment: Located within the Courthouse Area Design District, buildings would be compatible with Federalist and Colonial architecture as exemplified by the historic Chesterfield Courthouse, by Castlewood, and by Magnolia Grange, with architectural feanires including articulation of doors and windows, architectural ornamentation, and use of materials such as brick and/or siding for walls and standing seam metal or simulated slate for roofs. No visible flat or shed roofs would be permitted. Wall offsets and varied rooflines would be used on larger buildings to create the appearance of several small buildings clustered together. Within this District, architectural treatment must be compatible with buildings located within the same project or within the same block or directly across any road, as determined by the Director of Planning. Compatibility may be achieved through the use of sinular building massing, materials, scale, colors or other architectural features. The Director of Planning has indicated that compatibility should be achieved with the adjacent office building located on Tax ID 770-662-1443. Uses: In an effort to mininuze the impact of C-3 uses on adjoining properties zoned or designated by the Plan for office use, Proffered Condition 2 excludes uses pernutted in the C-1, C-2 and C-3 Districts that are motor vehicle oriented, including gasoline sales, motor vehicle washes and motor vehicle repair, sales and rental. CONCLUSION As proffered, the proposed zoning and land uses would continue to maintain compatibility with existing and anticipated area development while permitting properties that individually are constrained due to size and configuration, to be aggregated for development with adjacent commercially-zoned property. 14SN0 X42-2014FEB2Ei-B( )S-RPT Given these considerations, approval of this request is recommended. CASE HISTORY Planning Commission Meeting (1/21/14): The Planning Comnssion meeting scheduled for January 21, 2014 was rescheduled to January 23, 2014 due to inclement weather. Planning Commission Meeting (1/23/14): The applicant's representative accepted the recommendation. There was no opposition present. On motion of Dr. Brown, seconded by Mr. Patton, the Commission recommended approval and acceptance of the proffered conditions on page 2. AYES: Messrs. Wallin, Patton, Brown and Waller. ABSENT: Mr. Gulley. The Board of Supervisors, on Wednesday, Febniary 26, 2014 beginning at 6:30 p.m., will talce under consideration this request. Ei 14SN0 X42-2014FEB 2Ei-B ( )S-RPT ~ U i ~ ~,~ g w J ~ _ _.f z ~ a ~ wwo ~ ~ U U ~ C7 ~ *,. ."`~, )O = o r ++' ~ ~ ~ ~' 0U ~ ~ ~ ~ U Q ~ ~'" . •~~~p `~~~y~b ~~ .~ M NU i i -__' i ~, ~ ,, ~, i w z~~ ~ o~ ^~ Q M V o 0 ~a o ~ IV N O Z ~ o ~ a °~ r Q GOVERNMENT CENTER PKWY ~ „~ ~ ~,