Loading...
11-27-1974 MinutesVIRGINIA: At an adjourned meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County, held at the Courthouse on November 27, 1974, at 9:00 a.m. Present: Mr. Irwin G. Horner, Chairman Mr. Leo Myers, Vice-Chairman Mr. J. Ruffin Apperson Mr. A. J. Krepela Mr. E. Merlin O'Neill Mr. M. W. Burnett, Co. Admin. The invocation is given by Mr. Myers. Also Present: Mr. Stanley Balderson, Co. Planner Mr. James Condrey, Dir., Central Acctg. Mr. Don Ridle, Nursing Home Admin. Mr. Morris Mason, County Attorney Mr. Robert Painter, County Engineer Mr. William Prosise, Asst. Co. Eng. Mr. Michael Ritz, Planning Director Mrs. Joan Smith, Secretary Mr. David Welchons, Asst. Co. Eng. It is generally agreed that approval of the minutes of November 13, 1974, be deferred. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the follow- ing Water Contracts be and they hereby are approved: 1. W74-81CD Wedgewood', Section "3" $27,463.70 Stamie E. Lyttle Company 2. W74-77D Buford Estates 19,463.00 Bookman Construction Company Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers and Mr. Apperson. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that Water Contract W74~58CD-1, Providence Road, be and it hereby is awarded to Fred W. Barnes Construction Company in the amount of $58,757~99 (Bid - $57,021.00, material furnished by the County at a cost of $1,736.99). Ayes: Mr~ Horner, Mr. Myers and Mr. Apperson. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the follow- ing Sewer ~ontracts be and they hereby are approved: 1. S74-69CD 2. S74-74D 3. S74-'73D Bury 3-M Construction Company $27,589.00 Timber Ridge Stamie E. Lyttle Co., Inc. 85,349.75 Old Fox Trail Bookman Construction Company 54,809.90 4. S74-72D Winterberry Ridge 87,517.20 Fred W. Barnes Construction Company Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. Mr. Welchons states that the Board authorized the Engineering Department to design and make the cost estimates for the Kingsdale Road Sewer Project S74-42C. He presents the desing and the cost is estimated at $215,000. He states that this will serve 42 houses which will result in the cost per house of $5,100, and this line will go down Kingsdale Road to Kingsland Creek. Mr. Myers states that he has received a letter from Mr. Mort Thalhimer, which he requests be filed with the papers of this Board, stating that the Highway is planning to take the drainage field at the Bellwood Theater and he would like a connection. Mr. Myers states that he feels the contracts should be mailed and signed prior to the line being constructed. It is generally agreed by the Board that contracts will be sent to all in the area to ascertain the percentage requesting sewer connections. Mr. Welchons states that for Sewer Project S74-43C in the Elkhardt RoaJ area, they have sent out 157 contracts and 118 have signed representing 75.8%. He states the cost is estimated to be $485,000 and will serve 405 acres. He adds there is considerable vacant land in the area and this line would be designed for 11.4 persons per care which he feels is a little iow. Mr. Myers states that he feels they could delay this project until EPA has approved the Proctor's Creek System and then it could be brought back before this Board. Mr. Welchons asks if the Board would like the Engineering Department to proceed to acquire the necessary easements. Mr. Myers states that he feels the County will need the easements eventually and feels this may be a good time. Mr. Burnett states that he does not look for too much money from EPA as they have not turned loose money in a long time. Mr. Burnett states that he has received a letter from the State Water Control Board regarding the construction of sewers and its effects on the Greater Siren, an amphibian considered to be an endangered species. Upon consideration of the matter, it is generally agreed that Mr. Burnett write requesting a picture and the habitat of this amphibian in this area. On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the following requests for sewer service are approved: 1 7-11 Store at Walnut and Route 10. 2. Bury Subdivision - 10 connections - F. G. Sloan and Sons. 3. 9336 Russell Road - Ronald Childress. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. Mr. Painter states the next item on the agenda is the drainage requirements for Reynold's duplexes. Mr. Myers notes that no one is present to discuss this and neither have they appeared prior. He adds also they may have understood this discussion would take place at the same time the variance requests are to be considered. It is generally agreed that this~matter will be held over and dis- cussed at the time the variances are before the Board for consideration. On motion of Mr. Krepela, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that Route 751 be named Troywood Road and Route 670 be named Scottwood Road in Midlothian Magisterial District, at the request of the U. S. Post Office. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Krepela, it is resolved that Route 620 be named Woods Edge Road in Bermuda Magisterial District. Ayes: Mr. Homer, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr~ Krepela. Mr. Prosise presents the Board with a flyer which is being attachea to all build- ing permits. He states that it basically says that the Engineering Department will act as technical assistants for builders who have complicated problems with lot grading and that the building inspectors will also be responsible for the inspection of lots. He states that commercial building will still be 16oked at in the normal manner because a site plan will still be required. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the roads in the following Subdivisions be and they hereby are requested to be taken into the State System: QUALLA FARMS, SECTION "B" and "C" Enderly Court Beginning at its intersection with Qualla Road 0.12 mile easterly to a cul-de-sac. 0.12 mile BRITTONWOOD, SECTION "2" Brittonwood Drive Beginning at its intersection with State Route 145 0.08 mile to its intersection with Brittonwood Court thence northerly 0.04 mile to a dead end. Brittonwood Court Beginning at its intersection with Brittonwood Drive easterly 0.07 miel to a cul-de-sac. 0.12 mile 0.07 mile OLDE COACH VILLAGE, SECTION "C-i" Warmins ter Drive Beginning at its intersection with State Route 677 southwesterly 0.07 mile to its intersection with Corianna Lane thence south- westerly 0.08 mile to its intersection with Duckbill Drive, thence southwesterly 0.09 mile to its intersection with Warminster Court~ thence southwesterly 0.04 mile to a cul-de-sac. Corianna Lane Beginning at its intersection with Warminster Drive northwesterly 0.09 mile to a cul-de-sac. Duckbill Drive Beginning at its intersection with Warminster Drive northwesterly 0.14 mile to a cul-de-sac. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. 0.28 mile 0.09 mile 0.14 mile Mr. Prosise states that with inflation as it is, he feels it would be wise for the County to purchase a machine and materials to make street signs. He states that the County had looked at this possibility before and the cost could not be justified. Now with the present economic situation, the County would save considerable money. He states that a working area would be needed and feels there is space available at the County Airport. On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the County Engineering Department be authorized to purchase necessary equipment as outlined for the purpose of making highway and other needed signs for the County. Ayes: Mr. Homer, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. Mr. Painter states they have been having a problem getting an easement from the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company. He states that they requested a 20 foot easement and the Railroad Company is willing to give a 10 foot easement for a one-time payment of $1,930. Mr. Painter states that the question is whether to accept the 10 foot or try for the 20 foot. Mr, Burnett states that he feels we should pay for it but write that we will conform to their ideas if they will also conform to ours. Mr. Bridges states that two more easements are needed by the County and that if we take less than what is needed here, we may have to do the same at other sites. It is generally agreed that this matter will be deferred until further investiga- tion id done by the Engineering Department. On motion of Mr. Homer, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that the deed for the site of the Bailey Bridge Pumping Station be prepared and the price of the land be raised to $7,025 and further that the following conditions be'and they hereby are approved: That 1.7 acres be fenced'and camouflaged on the improved area; That reasonable neatness and order be maintained; and 3. That the flowing stream be allowed to flow on the property or be dried up completely so as not to allow water back up on the property of others. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers and Mr. Krepela. Mr. Painter states that of the three plans investigated for the Johnson Creek Pumping Station, the long-term plan seems to be the best and would cost approxi- mately $300,000 more than the cheapest plan. However, this plan would carry sewage by gravity further east on Johnson Creek and would be pumped to the Proctor's Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, serving a greater area in this section of the County. Mr. Apperson states he has questions regarding the County allowing industrial wastes into the system. Mr. Myers states that they would have to pretreat this material before its entry into the system. Mr. Painter states that the County will eventually have to handle industrial wastes. It is generally agreed that this matter be deferred for two weeks until the Board members can investigate this further. Dr. J. Van Bowen, Jr. comes before the Board to answer any questions regarding the proposed resolution regarding the channels a volunteer would have to follow in case a situation arose in which it was unclear as to who would handle the situation. He states the purpose is threefold: 1. To provide a channel in case issues arise, 2. To improve the morale of the companies at the administra- tive level, and 3. To strengthen the status of Chief. He states the Standards Board will be composed of the Chairman of the Chief's Association, an appointee of same and an appointee of the Fire Chief. He adds that the Fire Chief will sit in but will not be a voting member. On motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that the follow- ing resolution be and it hereby is approved: Be it resolved that the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approve the following items: When matters involving individual companies are brought before the Board of Supervisors, except by the County Chief of Department, the Board will defer action on the matter until the Chiefs Association has been given an opportunity to review the issue and report to the Board its position on the matter. II. Performance of companies; duties and qualifications of District Chiefs; Department standards of individual members; and training standards require continued review and evaluation. Since such matters generally should not be discussed bY a large group, a STANDARDS BOARD of District Chzefs zs establzshed. The Chairman of the Association shall be a member and shall appoint one other District Chief to the BOARD. The County Chief of Department shall meet with the STANDARDS BOARD and shall appoint one other District Chief to the BOARD. The duties of the STANDARDS BOARD will be to: A. Initiate evaluation of companies' traning accomplishments~ Ayes: Hear all complaints of the Chiefs concerning companies and District Chiefs as well as issues which the County Chief of Department cannot resolve With a District Chief, Co Hear all complaints concerning any member's activities or any company activities which might bring disgrace to the Department, D. i. Notify the Chief(s) involved in writing of issues considered, ii. Meet with the Chief involved and the administrative officer(s) of the respective company if necessary, iii. Present to the Chiefs Association, in extreme cases, a recommendation to be approved or amended and then sent to the County Chief of Department for action by the Board of Supervisors, if necessary. Mr. Hornet, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. Krepela. Mr. Don Ridle and Mr. James Condrey present the Board with additional information regarding the operation of the Nursing Home and reasons why the rate increase is necessary. Mr. Ridle presents a cost evaluation of other agencies operating a similar type of facility and rates are comparably the same but their theraphy costs, etc. are in addition to the daily rates whereas extra care is included in the daily rates of the Chesterfield County Nursing Home. He states that if the rates are not raised, the Nursing Home will operate on a deficit of approximately $117,000 at the end of fiscal year 19751 Mr. O'Neill inquires if the services can be cut back. Mr. Ridle states that they have to operate according to requirements of the government and if they do not they will not be able to obtain an operating license. Mr. Myers states that this rate increase goes against all that he stands for but he sees no alternative and he does not feel the taxpayers should subsidize this additional expense l It is generally agreed that this issue be deferred until all Board members are present to vote. Mr. John Scherer comes before the Board at the request of the Bi-Centennial Committee requesting space in the Courthouse complex to set up a Museum in celebration of the Bi-Centennial. He states the Old Clerk's Office or .the Old Jail would be considered good sites as they are in close proximity to fire and police protection. Mr. Burnett states that there are a number of conflicting interests that are not known and inquires when the next meeting of the Bi-Centenn- ial Committee would be held. Mr. Scherer.'states January 7, 1975. It is generally agreed by the Board that they will contact Mr. Scherer prior to that meeting. The Board adjourns for lunch. Reconvening: 74S095 In Bermuda Magisterial District, Lee Investment Corporation requests a conditional use to permit construction of 170 multi-family units on two parcels of l~d, containing 20 acres, bounded on the south by Bermuda Gardens Subdivision, SectiOn A, on the west by Morrisdale Subdivision, and being located at the north terminus of Rivermont Road. T.M. 135-8 (1) 6 & 18, Five Point Acres (Sheet 42). Mr. Balderson states that this request was deferred from last month's meeting. Mr. Zane Davis appears before the Board and introduces Mr. Ron Wilson, Architect for Lee Investment. Mr. Wilson states that the proposed development would consist of a cluster concept of courts, would provide a large area for recreation, would upgrade the community as a whole, and it would take approximately 2-3 years to complete. He states that the units will be two or three bedrooms and will range in price from $30,000 - $35,000. Mr. Horner inquires why they are requesting Townhouse Condominiums in lieu of Townhouses for Sale. Mr. Wilson states there is really no legal difference. Mr. Davis states that townhouses are not in a row and he feels this is the best use for the land. He states he has always done well by 'the County and will continue to do so. He states that those objecting are doing so because of the sewer problems and the water presSure problems in the area. He states that if the County cannot provide the necessary utilities in the area, he feels this request should not be approved. Mr. Hillard Hall, Jr. comes before the Board opposing this request because there would be only one outlet for traffic on Rivermont Road, there presently exists a bad situation with the schools, the sewer and the water pressure in the area, and also they feel this will be an open invitation to crime. He states a petition with 112 signatures was presented to the Planning Commission. He adds also that single-family dwellings would be welcomed in the area. Mr. Ronald Harris states that one reason he bought his home in this area was because all adjacent land was zoned for the same type of development. Mr. Douglas Stokes states that he was the developer of a local subdivision which homes cost $30,000 - $45,000 and the development of townhouses adjacent to this subdivision would be detrimental to the property owners in the area. Mr. Wallace Davenport, opposing this request also, states that the recreational facilities being planned for this development are for the development only and should not be a factor in this case as the County is also planning a recreational facility in the area. Mr. Horner inquires how many members are on the Board of Trustees for the Church. Mr. Cooley states five. Mr. Mason states that the evidence presented does not rightfully give the minister the authority he needs. Mr. Mason recommends that this case be deferred until the Church reaches an understanding and solution to this problem. Mr. Cooley inquires what more the Board needs. Mr. Mason states that the number present should be listed in the minutes, stating how many were present voting for and against this item and it should also be stated that this was a special meeting being duly advertised as such. Mr. Charles Cook comes before the Board and states that those people opposing this request.do not attend Church. Mrs. Irene Brown, Chairman of the Missionaries, reads a poem generally in favor of the zoning. Mr. Harold Thomas, an adjacent landowner comes before the Board with a petition signed by landowners within a 10 mile radius opposing this rezoning. Mr. George Ray comes before the Board and states that with 3-4 homes on an acre of land, this will be a bad situation for the owners as well as the community. Mr. Mike Cowan states that he feels the same way. Mr. 'Willis states that he has been a life-long resident of Chesterfield and this community and he does not oppose a project with 10 or 15 homes in this area but he cannot see 60 homes on 15 acres~ Ms. Dorothy Thomas comes before the Board and states that the people opposing never go to Church and they are trying to make a laughing stock of same. She states that one person had questions and is getting everyone else upset. · Mr. Arthur Merrit states he is a Trustee and that the Trustee Body has never given Rev. McElroy the authority to go ahead with this project. On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that action be deferred for 60 days on this request~ Mr. Mike Cowan states that it is not fair for the Board to make those persons opposed to this request to appear every 60 days as they have to take time off from work, etc. He states that those in opposition would like it to be decided on now. Mr. Horner states that even if the Church does get it together, it does not mean that zoning will be automatic. A vote being taken: Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill. 73S148 In Matoaca Magisterial District, Elizabeth Hines requests a conditional use to permit the operation of an air conditioning and heating business in an accessory building on a parcel of land located approximately one-half mile north of the intersection of Sandy Ford Road and Hickory Road and better known as 17111 Sandy Ford Road. T. M. 173-1 (1) 5 (Sheet 48). Mr. Balderson states that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this application~subject to the conditions noted. Mrs. Hines states that they are willing to abide by the conditions but would like the number of trucks changed from one (1) to two (2), as they have always had two. Mr. O'Neill feels that two trucks will not be a problem but inquires if she understands that no trash or junk will be allowed on the premises. She states that she understands. On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill. 74S105 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, D. K. Gilliam requests a conditional use to permit the construction and operation of a medical and professional center on a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 10.5 acres, fronting approximately 500 feet on Linden Lane, extending southwardly to a depth of approximately 800 feet and being located at the intersection of Linden Lane and Pocoshock Boulevard. T. M. 40-1 (1) 2 (Sheet 15). Mr. Balderson states that the Planning Commission did recommend approval subject to nine conditions. Mr. Burnett states that he has received a letter from the YMCA and they are in favor of this construction. On motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr. Myers, it is resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes: Mr. Homer, Mr. Myers and Mr. Apperson. 74S133 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, C. Porter Vaughan, Inc. requests rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R-12) of a parcel of land containing 20.1 acres, fronting approximately 750 feet on the south line of West Road and being located approximately 200 feet southwest of its intersection with Turner Road. T. M. 40-15 (2) 2, 26, 27 and 28, Belmont Farms (Sheet 15). There being no opposition, it is on motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr l Myers, resolved that this request be and it hereby is approved. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers and Mr. Apperson~ 74S135 In Clover Hill Magisterial District, Ree Ellis Associates, Inc. requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Community Business (B-2) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 11~6 acres, fronting approximately 300 ft. on Midlothian Turnpike, also fronting approximately 2,400 feet on Research Road, and being located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of the afore- mentioned roads. T~ M. 17-9 (1) 16, 17 and 19 (Sheet 8). Mr. Eugene Glenn comes before the Board and states that he agrees to the recommendations of the Planning Commission. Mr. George Sowers states that his PUD calls for a 20 foot undisturbed buffer adjacent to Mr. Glenn's land and states that there should be a buffer on the Glenn land also. Upon consideration whereof, it is on motion of Mr. Horner, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that the aforementioned parcel of land be and it hereby is rezoned to B-2 with the stipulations recommended by the Planning Commission. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill. 74S136 Mr. Nathaniel West comes before the Board requesting rezoning from Community Business (B-2) to General Business (B-3) of a parcel of land, containing .5 acre, fronting approximately 100 ft. along the east line of Jefferson Davis Highway and being located 150 ft. south of the intersection of Merriewood Road and Jefferson Davis Highway. T. M. 67-3 (1) 34 (Sheet 23). Whereas there is no opposition and the Planning Commission having recommended approval, it is on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr~ Apperson~ resolved that the aforedescribed parcel of land be and it hereby is rezoned to General Business (B-3). Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill. 74S137 Mr. G. E. Miles comes before the Board requesting the reconsideration of a condition imposed in granting of a special exception allowing duplex construction on a parcel of land, containing 1.5 acres, fronting approximately 200 ft. along the east line of Brandywine Avenue and being located approximately 200 ft. south of the intersection of Perlock Road and Brandywine Avenue. T. M. 81-16 (4) 17 & 18, Quail Oaks, Sec. I (Sheet 23). Mr. Balderson explains the history of this case and the suggested recommendations of the Planning Commission. Mr. Miles states that he agrees with the recommenda- tions except that it is unfair for the County to ask him to correct a drainage problem which has existed for years. Mr. Prosise explains that the developer will have two 18 inch culverts across Brandywine Avenue and will need an ease- ment to carry this drainage westwardly. Mr. Thomas Bondurant, Attorney for Mrs. Gee, states that the project started out as brick and should remain as brick, the storage fence should be kept and that there should be a 20 foot set back line not violated by a storage area unless the storage additions are constructed with brick. Mrs. Gee finally agrees that if the house are constructed with brick that no fence would be required on the south side. Mrs. Priestly states that the drainage along Brandywine is bad. Upon consideration whereof and on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that this Board approve the granting of a special exception allow- ing seven duplex buildings on the aforedescribed parcel of land provided that all buildings be constructed of brick plus the provisions recommended by the Planning Commission with the further stipulation that the drainage problems will have to be negotiated. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill. 74S138 Mr. J. R. Garnett comes before the Board requesting a conditional use to permit operation of a stock farm on a parcel of land, containing 1.3 acres, and being located approximately 125 ft. on the west line of Perrymont Road and approximate- ly 250 ft. northwest of the intersection of Perrymont Road and Norcliff Road. T. M. 81-4 (1) 8 (Sheet 23). There appears no opposition to this request and the Planning Commission having recommended approval, it is on motion of Mr. Myers, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that a conditional use to permit the operation of a stock farm on the aforedescribed property be and it hereby is approved with the provisions recommended by the Planning Commission~ Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill. Mr. Prosise comes before the Board requesting authorization to employ a local consulting firm to do certain design work for road and storm water in the Village of Ettrick. After some discussion of the matter, it is on motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Apperson, resolved that Mr. Prosise be given the authorization to employ an outside consulting firm to design a road and storm sewer project leading westwardly from Chesterfield Avenue and north of Ettrick's Elementary School. Ayes: Mr. Hornet, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill. This day again the matter of rates for the Chesterfield County Nursing Home was presented to the Board and after a thorough discussion and due to the exigency of the situation, it is on motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. Myers, resolved that the following rates of the County Nursing Home be and they hereby are changed as follows: Present Rate Revised Rate Per Diem Rate - Private ECF Per Diem Rate - Semi Private ECF Per Diem Rate - Private ICF Per Diem Rate - Semi Private ICF $28.00 $31.63 25.00 26.63 26.50 30.07 21.50 25.07 Ayes: Mr. Hornet, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr, O'Neill. On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr. O'Neill, it is resolved that the following erroneous tax claims be and they hereby are recommended for payment: 1974 Personal Property Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 ~rroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 'Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 Erroneous Assessment for half of 1974 .Dixie S. Langford Jimmy C. Carnes Chase Const. Co. Agatha Cheatham Alberta B. Cole Fred L. Cook, Jr. Fred L. Cook, Jr. Elaine L. Burroughs William B. Billaford Charles E. Wilson Charles E. Wilson John R. Garnett Bessie Lafoon Wallace H. LaPrade J. C. Little +~_ulia McGill ~iddle Dist. Bapt. Assn. Frances S. Otey Frances S. &Charles Otey Mozelle G. Pettigrew Mozelle G. Pettigrew Moselle G. Pettigrew Mozelle G. Pettigrew Mozelle G. Pettigrew Mozelle G. Pettigrew Paul D. Rose Charles M. Sheffield A. J. Shoosmith Harry T. Shoosmith Fred Shoosmith ttarryT. & Frank Shoosmith William S. Ward Mary S. Shoosmith Mary S. Shoosmith Mary S. Shoosmith Mary S. Shoosmith Mary S. Shoosmith Mary S. Shoosmith James A. & Shirley E. Lake Horner and Savage ~ ~-~ohn E. Gaugh ~ixty West Corp. William H. Kramer W. Lester Duty John W. Jones, Jr. Austen C. Micklem John W. Wheeler, III Robert H. Wiley Robert H. &Ora Lee Wiley George C. Crump Exxon Corp. John R. Garnett James W. Kirkman James E. Cotton C. B. Corp. Edward D. Allen Richard M. Allen Ayes: Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill. Abstention: Mr. Horner. $ 5.22 6.82 189.72 2.79 4.03 1.55 1.55 4.03 17.36 4.96 4.34 10.23 5.27 28.21 59.83 5 89 21 08 18 91 26 66 14 57 12 40 20 15 4 O3 9 30 9 30 2 93 2 79 16 43 221 65 7 44 29 45 26 97 4 03 4 03 4 03 4 03 4 03 4 03 177 32 4 65 48 98 2,661 66 12 40 43 40 14 57 23 25 4 03 10 85 18 91 32 55 477 40 15 81 29 45 330 15 17 36 9.61 5.58 On motion of Mr. O'Neill, seconded by Mr. Apperson, it is resolved that Mr. David F. Hines be authorized to install a temporary well system on Lot 15, Mr. Myers states he feels this is a good project but that he does not feel the people are ready for a development of this type next to single-family developments. Mr. Davis asks the Board to accept his withdrawal. Mr. Mason states that Mr. Davis will not be able to request this same use for this same area for one year if his withdrawal is accepted. Mr. Myers states there is no difference other than keeping Mr. Davis' slate clean~ Mr. Horner states that this is not an attempt to go around or confuse the people. On motion of Mr. Myers seconded by Mr~ O'Neill it is resolved that this Board accept Mr. Davis' request for withdrawal. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson, Mr. Krepela and Mr. O'Neill. Mr. Hall thanks the Board on behalf of the residents of the area. 74S103 In Matoaca Magisterial District, Shiloh Baptist Church requests the rezoning from Agricultural (A) to Residential (R~7) of a parcel of land of irregular shape, containing 15.2 acres, lying approximately 150 feet off the south line of Hickory Road and being located approximately 600 feet west of the intersection of Matoaca Road and Hickory Road. T. M, 173-10 (1) 11 (Sheet 48). Mr. George Parkman comes before the Board and states that Farmers Home has agreed to contribute $100,000 towards the construction of County sewer to the development. Mr. Burnett states that he had understood it to be $80,000. Mr. Parkman states .that they will contribute $80,000 with the understanding that they receive approximately $18,000 in off-site rebates which will be added to the contribution. Mr. Robert Cooley, Counsel for the Church, presents the minutes of the Church meeting held on November 17th at which the Rev. McElroy was authorized to proceed with plans for the development. Mr. O'Neill inquires why it took from August, which was the original date of application, to November to have the Church finally give authorization. Mr. Cooley states that this has been approved for years. Mr. Mason states that this raises the question of the legality of the vote. Mr. Cooley then reads the minutes of November 17, 1974. Rev. McElroy states that the Church purchased the property in 1971, and that members have forgotten the nature of the project. He states the questions being raised now are by those who have not attended the meetings. Mr. Myers inquires what is meant by authority. Rev. McElroy states that he has been given the authority to get everything in order. Mr. Myers inquires what happened that made the Church discuss this at the November 17th meeting. Rev. McElroy states that it was just a reaffirmation of the action taken in 1971. Rev. McElroy states that the membership wanted a new church which was not feasible. He states the opportunity presented itself for the Church to purchase the property. He states the idea then arose to build homes for the community and use the revenue for the church. He states that the newspapers built this up and that the member- ship started questioning the matter. Mr. Mason inquires if the Church has gotten Circuit Court approval. Rev. McElroy states that it was just mentally then, but they would proceed later. Mr. O'Neill inquires why Circuit Court approval is needed. Mr. Mason states that any time a Church acquires, sells, exchanges or leases land, Circuit Court approval is needed. Mr. Cooley states that for the purchase of land the Church does not need approval, the selling of the land would but that this has not gone that far yet. Mr. Myers states that it appears all members of the Church are not in favor of this zoning and he inquires if all members were present at the meeting on November 17th. Rev. McElroy states that the majority rules and that you never get 100%. He states it is change, it is new and it is different; and the people feel uncomfortable and are scared. Mr. O'Neill inquires if they are not trying to get the zoning before the differences are resolved in the Church. He adds that once it is zoned, it is zoned until another rezoning application is requested. Mr. Myers adds that being a Baptist himself he knows that the Church could have another meeting and change the decision made on November 17th. He states he does not feel the congregation knows what they want. Mr. Homer states that in the minutes, it states that the people were not allowed to ask questions regarding this rezoning. Rev. McElroy states that there were questions he could not answer and he did not want to answer them wrong so they did not discuss the matter. Mr. Myers states that they should have adjourned until the time when the questions could be answered. Rev. McElroy states they did adjourn until now and that another meeting will be held afterwards. Mr. O'Neill states that he has had numerous calls from those opposed to this and none are in favor of it. He states that this seems like a Church which is divided. He states the economic feasibility of this also looks bad as the land will cost approximately $6,000, which leaves only $18,000 for a three bedroom house on approximately .25 acre. Mr. Parkman states the land will be $5,250 per lot and that the homes will cost according to the income of the individual purchasing same. He states the mortgage is for 33 years so FHA must have some confidence in the development. Mr. Norman Cooley states that he is opposed to this request because members were not informed in an official business meeting of the plans, plans have not been presented to the membership, they have not seen any application, they were not allowed to ask questions regarding this zoning, they do not feel this is the proper time to build due to inflation, etc. Block B, Grayson Estates Subdivision. Ayes: Mr. Horner, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill, On motion of Mr. Apperson, seconded by Mr, Myers, it is resolved that ~this Board adjourn at 6:45 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 4, 1974. Ayes: Mr. Homer, Mr. Myers, Mr. Apperson and Mr. O'Neill.